alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Letters of Authorization To Take Marine Mammals

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, DOI.

ACTION:  Notice of issuance of two Letters of Authorization to take 
marine mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service implementing regulations [50 CFR 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby 
given that two Letters of Authorization to take polar bears and Pacific 
walrus incidental to oil and gas industry exploration activities have 
been issued to the following companies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Company                  Activity           Date issued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Geophysical Company...  Exploration......  May 22, 2000.
ARCO Alaska, Inc..............  Exploration......  May 26, 2000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor 
Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (800) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Letters of Authorization were issued in 
accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and 
Regulations ``Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified 
Activities (65 FR 16828; March 30, 2000).''

    Dated: May 31, 2000.
Gary Edwards,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 00-14454 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Argued and submitted May 29,

affirmed September 16, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*THOMAS A. SEAMAN, *Appellant.*

(90C-21493; CA A69899)

836 P2d 1379

David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

JOSEPH, C. J.

*182JOSEPH, C. J.

Defendant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), and, in a stipulated facts trial, was found guilty of supplying contraband. ORS 162.185. Both charges were based on the same incident. The sentencing court merged the convictions and sentenced defendant on the contraband count, a class C felony, instead of on the possession count, a class B felony.

Defendant does not challenge the merger of the convictions but argues that, for purposes of sentencing, the class C felony should have been “merged” into the class B felony, the “more serious” crime. Under the sentencing guidelines, he would serve more time in prison for the class C felony than he would for the class B felony. Defendant’s presumptive sentence for supplying contraband, which is ranked as category 5 on the crime seriousness scale, is 11-12 months incarceration, whereas the presumptive sentence for possession, ranked as category 1, is probation. *See Oregon Sentencing Guidelines Implementation Manual,*Appendices 3 and 4 (1989).

The state points out that, in *State v. Woolard,*259 Or 232, 484 P2d 314, 485 P2d 1194 (1971), the Supreme Court held that, when only a single sentence is authorized for conduct that violates more than one criminal statute, the trial court is bound to convict and sentence the defendant for the more serious crime. The court made clear that the more serious crime is the one carxying the greater maximum sentence. The state contends, however, that the sentencing guidelines have changed how “seriousness” of a crime is determined and that it is no longer only a question of statutory classification but also involves the ranking of the crime on the crime seriousness scale. We agree. *See State v. Moeller,*105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, *rev dismissed*312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). The trial court did not err.

Defendant contends that imposing a greater sentence for a class C felony than for a class B felony violates the constitutional requirement of proportionality. Or Const, Art I, § 16. Defendant made no such constitutional challenge *183below, and we will not address the argument for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.
#### § 144.30-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each MODU engaged in OCS activities that is documented under the laws of a foreign nation.

[CGD 82-075b, 49 FR 4377, Feb. 6, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                                          Exhibit  99(h)

                               QUARTERLY STATEMENT


         This Quarterly Statement is being provided pursuant to the requirement
of Section 3.07(h)VIII of that certain Indenture dated as of August 21, 2003
between Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (the "Transition
Bond Company"), as Issuer, and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, (as
originally executed and, as from time to time supplemented or amended by one or
more Series Supplements or indentures supplemental thereto entered into pursuant
to the applicable provisions of the Indenture, as so supplemented or amended, or
both, the "Indenture"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Appendix A of the
Indenture.

         I, John M. Casey, hereby certify that I am the Assistant Treasurer of
Oncor Electric Delivery Company ("Oncor"), the parent company of the Transition
Bond Company, and the servicer of the transition bonds under that certain Series
2003-1 Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of August 21, 2003
between the Transition Bond Company and Oncor.

         I hereby affirm that, in all material respects, for each materially
significant REP for which Oncor provided electric delivery transmission and
distribution services for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2003, (a)
each REP has been billed in compliance with the requirements outlined in the
Financing Order; (b) each REP has made payments in compliance with the
requirements outlined in the Financing Order; and (c) each REP satisfies the
creditworthiness requirements of the Financing Order.




                                               /s/ John M. Casey
                                            ------------------------------
                                                   John M. Casey
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Southern District of Florida

SALLY LEVY and LARRY LEVY

MONSANTO COMPANY

MONSANTO COMPANY

c/o Corporation Service Company, Registered Agent

1201 Hays Street

Tallahassee, FL 32301-2525

Eric Roslansky

The Ruth Law Team

P.O. Box 16847

St. Petersburg, FL 33733-6847

9:22-cv-81326-AMC

Aug 29, 2022 s/ M. Brown

Case 9:22-cv-81326-AMC Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### PETER S. MOORE, Respondent, *v.*DAVID H. BIXBY, Appellant.

*Statute of frauds—ddimery of personal pi’operty.*

Mere words are not sufficient to constitute a delivery of personal property. *(Good v.*Curtiss, 31 How. Pr., 4; *Shindler*v. *Houston, 1 N.*Y., 261-265; *Caulkins v. Hellman,*47 id., 449.)*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee, in an action on an account.

*E. H.*Prindle, *for the*appellant.

*George A. Haven,*for the respondent.

*

 See *Ham*v. *Van Orden, ante,*page 709.— [Rep.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event, and referee discharged.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6397

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MOISE W. TOHOTCHEU,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00305-CMH-3; 1:09-cv-01180-CMH)

Submitted: November 19, 2010 Decided: December 14, 2010

Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Moise W. Tohotcheu, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Lieselotte KrebsPilotti, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Moise W. Tohotcheu seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Tohotcheu has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
§ 20.609 Motions to quash or modify. ( a ) A person to whom a subpoena is directed may, by motion with notice to the party requesting the subpoena, ask the ALJ to quash or modify the subpoena.
( b ) Except when made at a hearing, the motion must be filed: ( 1 ) 10 days or less after service of a subpoena compelling the appearance and testimony of a witness or the production of evidence or
( 2 ) At or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance, whichever is earlier.
( c ) If the subpoena is served at a hearing, the person to whom it is directed may, in person at the hearing or in writing within a reasonable time fixed by the ALJ, ask the ALJ to quash or modify it.
( d ) The ALJ may quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable or requires evidence not relevant to any matter in issue.
Exhibit


32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
      Isco, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              August 20, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Jay IscoJay
              Isco, Chief Financial
              Officer
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.T05-0563 Safety Zone; M/V DALI, Moored in the Elizabeth River, Norfolk, VA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: All waters of the Elizabeth River within 100 yards of the M/V Dali while it is moored in the Port of Virginia.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, *designated representative* means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Virginia (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
( 2 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by VHF-FM Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
( d ) *Enforcement officials.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
( e ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced while the M/V Dali is moored at the Port of Virginia between June 21, 2024 and September 20, 2024.
[Doc. No. USCG-2024-0563, 89 FR 53028, June 25, 2024]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 CASE NO. 22-14052-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

NICHOLAS JAMES SORGENFREY,

 Defendant.

 _____ /

NOTICE OF FILING

CORRECTED INDICTMENT AND PENALTY SHEET

The United States of America, by the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, 

respectfully submits the attached corrected Indictment and penalty sheet in light of the 

Court’s order granting the government’s unopposed motion to amend Indictment and penalty 

sheet to correct scrivener’s errors (ECF No. 17). 

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: /s/ Christopher H. Hudock

Christopher H. Hudock

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 92454

101 South U.S. 1, Suite 3100

Fort Pierce, Florida 34950

Tel: (772) 293-0951

Email: Christopher.hudock@usdoj.gov

Case 2:22-cr-14052-AMC Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 14, 2022, a copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing 

system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. All other parties will be served 

by either regular U.S. mail or inter-office delivery.

/s/Christopher H. Hudock____ ___

Christopher H. Hudock 

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:22-cr-14052-AMC Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2022 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 453 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 453

  Recognizing February 20, 2008, as the 100th anniversary of Abraham 
                     Baldwin Agricultural College.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2008

  Mr. Chambliss (for himself and Mr. Isakson) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing February 20, 2008, as the 100th anniversary of Abraham 
                     Baldwin Agricultural College.

Whereas the Second District Agricultural and Mechanical School opened its doors 
        for classes on February 20, 1908, with 3 instructors and 27 students;
Whereas the school became a senior college for men, the first in south Georgia, 
        in 1929;
Whereas the school changed its name in 1933 to Abraham Baldwin Agricultural 
        College in honor of a Georgia signer of the Constitution of the United 
        States and the first president of the University of Georgia;
Whereas the college recorded its all-time highest enrollment during the 2007 
        fall semester with 3,665 students from 154 Georgia counties, 12 other 
        States, and 9 countries;
Whereas the college has expanded its curriculum to include 57 programs of study;
Whereas the college bears strong witness to its roots, with the Division of 
        Agriculture and Forest Resources remaining the largest division of study 
        on the 421 acre campus with over 800 students;
Whereas Washington Monthly Magazine named the college as one of the 10 best 
        community colleges in America in 2007;
Whereas Turfnet Magazine selected the college's 2-year turfgrass program as the 
        7th best program of its kind in the United States and Canada in 2007;
Whereas the college celebrates among its alumni the Honorable George T. Smith, 
        the only man in the history of Georgia to serve in elected positions in 
        all 3 branches of State government, having served as Lieutenant 
        Governor, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and as a justice on 
        the Supreme Court of Georgia; and
Whereas February 20, 2008, marks the 100th anniversary of Abraham Baldwin 
        Agricultural College: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of Abraham Baldwin 
        Agricultural College for its great contributions to the 
        community and to higher education in Georgia; and
            (2) recognizes the achievements of the administration, 
        faculty, students, and staff of Abraham Baldwin Agricultural 
        College.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32(c)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Power Company. |

 

 

|   | /s/Michael D. Garrett

Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Ronnie R. Labrato

Ronnie R. Labrato

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

Date:  May 7, 2009
Argued and submitted October 5,

affirmed December 21, 1994

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Richard A. Holzner, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and EC Company, *Petitioners, v.*Richard A. HOLZNER, *Respondent.*

(92-15267; CA A83104)

887 P2d 392

James W. Moller, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Rulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

James S. Coon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Royce, Swanson, Thomas & Coon.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *SAIF v. Allen,*320 Or 192, 881 P2d 773 (1994); *SAIF v. Blackwell,*131 Or App 519, 886 P2d 1028 (1994).
EVENT 

PLANNING 

TIPS

 STEPS TO SUCCESS

1 Plan: Thoughtful preparation is the cornerstone of a 

successful event. Start planning early and set clear goals. 

Identify people who can help with planning, including 

volunteers and vendors. Meet regularly with your planning 

team and keep track of major decisions and action items.

2 Partner: Join forces with others in your community. 

Partners can often provide in-kind services, volunteers, 

and materials. They may also have connections to 

speakers and media contacts who are interested in 

participating. Partners are also the best way to expand 

your reach online.

3 Promote: Develop a publicity plan to promote your 

event. Identify a spokesperson, create a press release, and 

contact local media outlets. Use traditional strategies, like 

posting flyers, as well as new media and your website.

4 Produce: Use a space large enough to accommodate 

your group. Make sure it is easy for everyone to access. 

Bring ample supplies and resources (see sample checklist 

below). For large events, ask coordinators and volunteers 

to wear matching shirts or dress in the same color.

5 Publish: Share any media or news coverage of your 

event with everyone who helped you. Post a summary of 

the event coverage on your website and highlight key 

aspects on your social media. Remember to include 

photos. They gain traction for your posts and those who 

attended will appreciate them. 

Event Checklist

Early in your planning 

process, start a checklist to 

help you prepare. Think 

carefully about the goods, 

people, and materials you 

might need. Allow plenty of 

time to order supplies. 

Here is a sample checklist 

to get you started:

• Refreshments (consider 

asking a local business to 

donate snacks)

• Public address (PA) 

system/microphone

• Other equipment, such 

as a laptop and projector 

for presentations

• Adequate seating

• Pens and notepads

• Registration material, 

such as name badges

• Featured presenters and 

speakers

• Handouts, brochures, 

and similar material

• Decorations and 

giveaways

• Transportation or related 

information for 

participants

• Inclement weather plan 

(if you intend to hold 

your event outdoors)