alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7274
DAWN DEMPSY SUTTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GARY L. WINKLER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-847-5-H) Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dawn Dempsey Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dawn Dempsey Sutton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sutton v. Winkler , No. CA-03-847-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22 & June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4786 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                                        
 
                                             (Original Signature of 
                                Member)

                                    

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. ____

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

   Mr. Barr of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Kingston, Mr. 
 Collins, Mr. Linder, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Deal of Georgia, 
 Mr. Bishop, and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on ______________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 110 Postal Way in Carrollton, Georgia, as the ``Samuel P. Roberts 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SAMUEL P. ROBERTS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 110 Postal Way in Carrollton, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Samuel P. Roberts Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Samuel P. 
Roberts Post Office Building''.
```
DJI Phantom 2 Pre- Flight Checklist and Controls

Power on radio controller. Visually inspect that all screws and propellers are fastened properly on Phantom 2. Power on Phantom 2. Power on and sync Ground station. Check current wind, weather, and solar conditions using internet. Calibrate compass Wait for at least 8 satellite signals, take a walk around property while waiting to survey flight path. Ensure GPS position lock indicator symbol is on. Survey the area again, and make sure there are no unsupervised children or animals within 250 meters. Launch and let hover for 30 seconds, 10m over ground, to confirm proper compass calibration.
J

~~~ eo srq r

~

s UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

# Z ~ w WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
Q o = qC PROS'

G

~ `

J. R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. F3ox 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221
Dear Mr. Stroble: 

### JUL 2 6 2011 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

We received your letter dated July 22, 2011, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification memo the Carlsbad Field Ottice (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Hanford Site. We concur with the draft recertification memo to recertify Hanford's waste characterization progratn for the contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) waste. In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on Deceniber 21, 2010, EPA approved Hanford's CH TRU waste characterization program (See EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-138). The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH TRU waste are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft recertification memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and proeesses mentioned in the Hanford draft recertification menio are consistent with EPA's existing Hanford-CCP specific baseline and Tier 1 approvals. Thatlk you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for Hanford-CCP. lf you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9462. Sincerely,

Rajani Joglekar Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Internet Address (URL) • http:!/www.epa.gov RecycledlRecyclable • Printed wfth Vegetable OII Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### cc: (Electronic Distribution)

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP Court Fesmire, CBFO NTP Randy Unger, CBFO QA Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA Site Documents, CBFO Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA
<page>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<table>
<caption>
------------------  ---------------  ----------------------  ------------------
                                                                  STATE OF
                                                              INCORPORATION OR
      PARENT           SUBSIDIARY     PERCENT OF OWNERSHIP      ORGANIZATION
------------------  ---------------  ----------------------  ------------------

                 <c>              <c>                     <c>
                       The First
   First Ottawa      National Bank
 Bancshares, Inc.      of Ottawa              100%              National Bank
------------------  ---------------  ----------------------  ------------------
    The First         First Ottawa
  National Bank        Financial
    of Ottawa            Corp.                100%                Delaware
------------------  ---------------  ----------------------  ------------------
</table>
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Southern Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/David M. Ratcliffe

David M. Ratcliffe

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Thomas A. Fanning

Thomas A. Fanning

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

            |

 

 

Date:  August 3, 2006
§ 2.34 Waters subject to tidal influence; waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; mean high water. ( a ) *Waters subject to tidal influence and waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide* are waters below mean high water. These terms do not include waters above mean high water caused by flood flows, storms, high winds, seismic waves, or other non-lunar phenomena.
( b ) *Mean high water* is the average of the height of the diurnal high water at a particular location measured over a lunar cycle of 19 years.
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Advaxis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on
Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:



(1)
the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date:
    January 21, 2020 | By:    | /s/ Kenneth
    Berlin                 
|-------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------
|                           | Name:  | Kenneth
    Berlin                     
|                           | Title: | President
    & Chief Executive Officer
January

Celebrate Service!

Commemorate Dr. King's life and achievements by serving your 

community. Peace Corps Volunteers spend two years serving in 

countries around the world. Take this opportunity to take action 

through service learning.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day of Service

Check out:

o Our Correspondence Match program - communicate directly with a Volunteer who 

is serving abroad.

o World Wise Schools' service-learning module 

o "Working for the Common Good"-A community in the Dominican Republic shows 

its true community spirit after Hurricane Georges
§ 163.01 Application. ( a ) The regulations in this part apply to vessels navigating the harbors, rivers, and inland waters of the United States, except the Great Lakes and their connecting and tributary waters as far east as Montreal, the Red River of the North, the Mississippi River and its tributaries above Huey P. Long Bridge, and that part of the Atchafalaya River above its junction with the Plaquemine-Morgan City alternate waterway.
( b ) Seagoing barges and their towing vessels shall be subject to the requirements in this part under the provisions of section 14 of the Act of May 28, 1908, as amended (sec. 14, 35 Stat. 428, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 152). Under the provisions of section 15 of the Act of May 28, 1908, as amended (sec. 15, 35 Stat. 429; 33 U.S.C. 153), the penalty for use of an unlawful towline shall be an action against the master of the towing vessel seeking the suspension or revocation of his license or merchant mariner credential.
[CGFR 60-61, 25 FR 9045, Sept. 21, 1960, as amended by CGFR 66-59, 31 FR 13647, Oct. 22, 1966. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981; USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11213, Mar. 16, 2009]
§ 154.107 Alternatives. ( a ) The COTP may consider and approve alternative procedures, methods, or equipment standards to be used by a facility operator in lieu of any requirement in this part if: ( 1 ) Compliance with the requirement is economically or physically impractical;
( 2 ) The alternative provides an equivalent level of safety and protection from pollution by oil or hazardous material, which is documented in the request; and
( 3 ) The facility operator submits a written request for the alternative.
( b ) The COTP takes final approval or disapproval action on the request, submitted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, in writing within 30 days of receipt of the request.
[CGD 75-124, 45 FR 7169, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36252, Sept. 4, 1990; CGD 93-056, 61 FR 41458, Aug. 8, 1996]
#### American Standard Jewelry Company *v.*Goodman.

Beck, J.

1. Where suit was brought upon a written contract for goods sold, and the defendant filed a sworn plea denying the execution of the instrument sued on, it was permissible for him to further plead and set up what the true agreement was, the same, according to the contentions of the defendant, not having been reduced to writing; and that the plaintiff had failed to comply with his obligations under said oral agreement.

2. Such further plea, admitting that the defendant had entered into contractual relations with the plaintiff relatively to the goods alleged to have been sold under the terms of the written contract, the execution of which was denied, was not demurrable on the ground that it sought to vary the terms of a valid written instrument by parol testimony, and to introduce a contract different from the one sued on.

*544Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided February 14, 1907.

Action on contract. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court. January 9, 1906.

Hendricks, *Smith & Christian,*for plaintiff.

*Alexander & Gary,*for defendant.

•3. The other questions raised by the assignments of error in the bill of exceptions depend for their proper determination upon the evidence,, which this court will not consider, as the alleged brief of evidence is largely interspersed with colloquies between court and counsel, with statements of the stenographer, and with the questions of counsel and the answers of the witnesses thereto. Further, the brief of evidence contains ' a large mass of documentary evidence consisting of letters and other writings, much of which, at a glance, is seen to be totally irrelevant. The ‘mere fact that some portion of the evidence was properly reduced to narrative form dqes not take this brief of the evidence out of range of the rulings in the case of *Price*v. *High,*108 *Ga.*145, and in the cases there cited.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 2 NASS, USDA

All layers in the U.S. on May 1, 1999, totaled 320 million, up 3 percent from a year ago. The

320 million layers consisted of 261 million layers producing table or commercial type eggs,

56.8 million layers producing broiler-type hatching eggs, and 2.77 million layers producing

egg-type hatching eggs. Rate of lay per day on May 1, 1999, averaged 69.5 eggs per 100 layers,

down fractionally from the 69.6 a year ago.
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 3 NASS, USDA

All Layers: Average Number on Hand During the Month,

United States, 1996-99

Month 1996 1997 1998 1999

1,000 Layers 1,000 Layers 1,000 Layers 1,000 Layers

1

Jan


Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 7 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 8 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 10 NASS, USDA

Egg Production: By Type, State, and United States,

March 1998-99

State Total Production Table Eggs 1 Hatching Eggs 1

1998 1999 2 1998 1999 2 1998 1999 2

Million Eggs Million Eggs Million Eggs Million Eggs Million Eggs Million Eggs

AL

AR

CA

CO

CT

FL

GA

HI

IL

IN

IA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 11 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 12 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 13 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 15 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 16 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 17 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1999 19 NASS, USDA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000001923
<NAME> ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,498,686
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,657,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (160,980)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,103,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,080,463
<PP&E>                                      93,055,028
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,735,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,548,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,807,705
<BONDS>                                     63,684,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,014,039
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,384,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,548,757
<SALES>                                     57,749,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,905,447
<CGS>                                       51,003,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,003,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,620,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                38,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,248,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,993,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                   750,328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,243,619
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
# MD5 checksums generated by MD5summer (http://www.md5summer.org)
# Generated 4/9/2008 7:56:09 AM

f146ec45ab87823a399aa2d697cceb6e *jan.mannlib.cornell.edu/index.htm
305d3481f2053c5feaa59b1a4eb64a8d *maps.google.com/maps-file=api&v=2&key=ABQIAAAAfZgfBOKniqjhryaELgFmfBRy_t10iRBeJ5nNFN3CtnR0pOKASBQAk5xreH5bDBoC_P1nryV2rGaGVQ
33ab22eb5dd974f091917b1e93ebf2b3 *s.clicktale.net/WRa.js
9b0dce6f46019716e66bb038b375c61e *video.google.com/googleplayer.swf-docId=1149018079123470300&hl=en
989e3ce75171a96f4acc40335de205cf *www.ams.usda.gov/508a.gif
f5e9fb9fc82e3dc76dda19611c23fdb6 *www.ams.usda.gov/508statment.htm
d6404fc018978a1c5b5ea3596d3c34e3 *www.ams.usda.gov/amsindex.htm
899a88187b51da9db2a9318dea9fc2fc *www.ams.usda.gov/ams_usda-1.gif
899a88187b51da9db2a9318dea9fc2fc *www.ams.usda.gov/ams_usda.gif
c2c8017d7126cf4590ecec49f909e239 *www.ams.usda.gov/contact.htm
6b9d9764f552e0a4d7baec3e74aea5e2 *www.ams.usda.gov/csh.gif
c39885b8995cd8582fe1813b136179d8 *www.ams.usda.gov/imports.htm
64eea817f0a20f83b1e40e92fe040a96 *www.ams.usda.gov/LaunchFAQ.htm
60961d2e8123bd5c28dc86ca40780731 *www.ams.usda.gov/line_side.GIF
e0cadd05d581ad527e0bfbbe21975a96 *www.ams.usda.gov/marketnews.htm
bbc57d1209c02715852556f74090a4c9 *www.ams.usda.gov/menu_top_long.GIF
f4f4259001a8908a0e4dd10016e54f4b *www.ams.usda.gov/nondis.gif
e8f44a287b349d919d601ed252a1723d *www.ams.usda.gov/nondiscrimination.htm
0112baf192d2b512916e9e23e7c20109 *www.ams.usda.gov/privpol.htm
7b249c536b87b3e59b2bba416f466e15 *www.ams.usda.gov/pubaff.htm
840383a3f74370bd61ea4daef196c9f0 *www.ams.usda.gov/repromo.htm
af1533c319e0ec64c0ea1e2b2e3891b9 *www.ams.usda.gov/title_ams.gif
46859913dc53ef1b8231749b348336b5 *www.ams.usda.gov/tit_ams_index.gif
8d8077e2c8e08fa211683a2f995550c2 *www.ams.usda.gov/tit_importers.gif
6f18a7566176657d5933dc71df07aa30 *www.ams.usda.gov/tit_r&p.gif
0b150733d444771220201bc8112bc4ef *www.mannlib.cornell.edu/cafe.cfm.htm
b1bf8ff84e61afd2f68dbaaf055586f5 *www.mannlib.cornell.edu/loader.cfm.htm
52744394cec8cd859c05cf919f31f90d *www.nass.usda.gov/index.asp.htm
a25b6785d951301b855b3b27292c7708 *CherProd-06-21-2007.zip
# ToC

# Other Activities by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-10: Other Ombudsman Activities for FY 2013	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-10: p. &P	

# Other Activities by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-10: Other Ombudsman Activities by Region for FY 2013	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-10: p. &P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES RILEY DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1639

[February 21, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura S. Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CF002327-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 32(b) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abrams Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 17, 2005
    
    /s/ Mark J. ThomasMark J. ThomasChief Financial Officer