alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

Plating Tips for Your HomeDelivered Meals Program

The Importance of Plating for Home-Delivered Meals

Plating adds value to the dining experience. An attractively-plated meal is more 

appetizing to diners and sends a message of quality that words can’t express. It tells 

people that you care about your craft and want them to enjoy their meals as much 

as you enjoyed preparing their meals. This is especially important for older adults 

that are unable to leave their homes. Communicating this quality to people that are 

not able to access traditional dine-in meal services can positively impact the health 

outcomes of older adults. Some additional benefits include increasing participant 

retention, supporting the creativity of the kitchen staff and chefs, and setting a 

positive tone for at-home dining.

Key Presentation Factors to Consider

• Color: Color is an easy way to achieve beautiful plating. Multiple colors are 

more appealing to the eye. You can add color using fresh herbs and small 

edible garnishes. 

• Arrangement: Don’t overcrowd a plate—this can be overwhelming. Try to 

create visual interest with tactics such as laying chicken on top of veggies, 

rice, or pasta. 

• Texture: Texture can increase meal satisfaction and takes two forms. One is 

the way food feels in the mouth: soft, firm, or crunchy. Second is the exterior
2

appearance of a food. As with flavor and color, variety is key. Food presented 

together on a plate should be balanced in texture.

Ideas for Enhancing Plating

Plating should be tailored to the populations you serve, the meal’s cuisine (such as 

Italian or Taiwanese), and your delivery system such as daily, hot meals versus 

weekly, frozen meals. Here are some ideas that can be used for either scenario:

• Add an instruction card with ideas on ways to enhance the flavor of the meal 

with available grocery items, such as adding dried or fresh berries to shelf 

stable oatmeal packets or drying fresh bread in the oven to make 

breadcrumbs for any meal that needs a crunch.

• Deliver small containers of fresh herbs to allow for personalization in the 

flavor and look of meals.

• Make sure you also add information about food safety: how to store meals, 

how to reheat meals, when they should be thrown out, etc.

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for 

Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. 

Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express 

freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily 

represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services 

Programs. For more information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.
Exhibit 23.1
------------
               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------



We have issued our report dated September 14, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Financial Content,  Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the years  ended June 30,  2005 and 2004 which is  included  in this  Annual
Report. We consent to the inclusion of our report in this Annual Report.


//s// Pohl, McNabola, Berg, & Company LLP
-----------------------------------------------
Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company LLP


San Francisco, California
September 28, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL ANTONIO GARAY

CASTILLO,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 73025

Agency No. A029

- 134

- 152

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2016 **

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Manuel Antonio Garay

- Castillo, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding

of removal, and protection under the Co nvention Against Torture (“CAT”). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)( 2). 

# FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 73025

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir.

2006), and w e deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Garay

- Castillo

failed to establish past persecution. See id. at 1185

- 87 . Substantial evidence also

supports the agency’s determination that Garay

- Castillo failed to establish an

objectively reasonable fea r of future persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d

1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) . Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Garay

Castillo’s asylum claim.

Because Garay

- Castillo failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he

necessarily cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.

See Zehatye , 453 F.3d at 1190.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Garay

- Castillo failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be

tortured b y or with the consent or acquiescence of the Nicaraguan government.

See Robleto

- Pastora v. Holder , 591 F.3d 1051, 1058 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
##### 



COMMON SHARES
ONE
THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE
IN CANTON, MA, JERSEY CITY, NJ AND NEW YORK, NY
This Certifies thatPalm, Inc.
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARECOMMON SHARES
CUSIP 696643 10 5
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
is the record holder ofFULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001
PER SHARE, OF Palm, Inc. transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly
authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not
valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar. In Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be executed and attested to by
the manual or facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers, under a facsimile of its
corporate seal affixed hereto. Dated:
REGISTERED:
Trust
COMPANY,
AUTHORIZED
TRANSFER N.A.AND SIGNATURE REGISTRAR AGENT




---



##### 



Palm, Inc.
    TEN COM
    
    
    
    as tenants in commonTEN ENT
    
    
    
    as tenants by the entiretiesJT TEN
    
    
    
    as joint tenants with right of
survivorship and not as tenants
in common
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT
    
    
    
    
    
    Custodian(Cust)
    
    
    
    (Minor)under Uniform Gifts to MinorsAct(State)
    For value received,
    
    
    
    hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto
  
 
   (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)Sharesof Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appointAttorneyto transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
 Dated
  X
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    XNOTICE:
    
    THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR,
WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
  ByTHE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT
TO SEC RULE 17Ad-15.
  EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY, N.A. IS THE SUCCESSOR RIGHTS AGENT TO THE ABOVE-REFERENCED AGREEMENT.
#### § 167.450 In the Santa Barbara Channel Traffic Separation Scheme: General.

The Traffic Separation Scheme in the Santa Barbara Channel is described in §§ 167.451 and 167.452. The geographic coordinates in §§ 167.451 and 167.452 are defined using North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6791** 

GLENN WM. GREEN

- EL , P etitioner

- Appellant ,
v. RODERICK SOWERS; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; J. PHILIP MORGAN , Respondent s - Appellees
.

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8 :08

- cv - 0 0700

- AW )

Submitted : November 30 , 20 1 0 Decided: December 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN , and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Glen n Wm. Green

- El , Appellant Pro Se. E dward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 PER CURIAM: Glenn Wm. Green

- El seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stan dard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When th e district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85
. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Green

- El has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSE D
Exhibit 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27,
2008 of K-Tron International, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):




---



##### 



Date: November 4, 2008
    
    RONALD R. REMICK

Ronald R. RemickSenior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer
§ 209.138a Authorization for exploratory drilling in the Gulf of Santa Catalina, Calif. ( a ) Department of the Army authorization is required pursuant to section 4(f) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953 (67 Stat. 462; 43 U.S.C. 1333(f)) in coastal waters and the water covering the Outer Continental Shelf. The determination whether or not to issue a Department of the Army authorization for structures on the Outer Continental Shelf related to exploration of minerals is based upon the proposed activities' effect on navigation and national security. All other matters concerning offshore drilling, including environmental considerations, are the responsibility of the Department of the Interior.
( b ) The following rules have been developed jointly by the Los Angeles district engineer and the 11th Coast Guard District, in consultation with the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Geological Survey for drilling in the Gulf of Santa Catalina: ( 1 ) All drilling with a single tract will be covered by a single application.
( 2 ) Where practicable, applications shall be submitted at least 120 days in advance of drilling for tracts where drilling is expected to be accomplished within the traffic separation scheme, the precautionary zone or within 2 nautical miles of a traffic lane.
( 3 ) Applications shall include the location of any known proposed drilling site and the estimated start and completion dates for each. Updated information on the plan shall be furnished as soon as available. One individual (and alternate) shall be designated by the applicant as responsible for maintaining close liaison with all involved agencies.
( 4 ) Where it is not feasible to perform exploratory work from outside the traffic lanes or 1 ⁄ 4 mile buffer zones, or precautionary zone, authorizations will include the following conditions: ( i ) Exploratory vessels within a traffic lane will, to the degree practicable, be sited near traffic lane boundaries.
( ii ) Exploratory vessels within one traffic lane, or in the precautionary zone, shall be separated by at least 8 nautical miles in the direction of the lane axis.
( iii ) Exploratory vessels located within the traffic lanes, or the precautionary zone, shall not have their pendant buoys within 3,000 yards from the pendant buoys of any other vessel.
( iv ) Exploratory rigs and vessels engaged in offshore development may have no cables, anchors, buoys, or other associated equipment within the traffic lanes, 1 ⁄ 4 mile buffer zones, or the precautionary zone, at a depth of less than 100 feet, unless such equipment is marked with class I private aids to navigation in accordance with current Federal regulations.
(67 Stat. 462 (43 U.S.C. 1333(f))
[43 FR 28475, June 30, 1978]
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
                             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                              (SEC Coverage)
                                                (Unaudited)

                                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                                                -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 1998         1997       1996        1995        1994
                                                 ----         ----       ----        ----        ----
                                                                    (In Thousands)
<S>                                                 <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Net Income                                     $ 50,386    $ 65,758     $37,926    $29,101     $34,726
----------

Add income taxes and fixed charges
----------------------------------
  Current federal income taxes                   10,978      34,244      25,867      9,437      (6,762)
  Deferred federal income taxes                  18,558         912      (6,052)     6,156      24,932
  Investment tax credits - net                   (1,086)     (1,103)     (1,118)    (1,132)     (1,228)
  Massachusetts franchise tax                     6,999       7,514       4,479      3,935       4,681
  Interest on long-term debt                     27,073      27,612      27,089     25,901      20,967
  Interest on short-term debt and other           7,368       7,214       6,473      6,784       6,366
                                               --------    --------     -------    -------     -------
Net earnings available for fixed charges       $120,276    $142,151     $94,664    $80,182     $83,682
                                               --------    --------     -------    -------     -------

Fixed charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                   $ 27,073    $ 27,612     $27,089    $25,901     $20,967
  Interest on short-term debt and other           7,368       7,214       6,473      6,784       6,366
                                               --------    --------     -------    -------     -------
     Total fixed charges                       $ 34,441    $ 34,826     $33,562    $32,685     $27,333
                                               ========    ========     =======    =======     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 3.49        4.08        2.82       2.45        3.06
----------------------------------

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.2025 Atlantic Area. ( a ) This section applies to any vessel or person in the navigable waters of the United States within the boundaries of the U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area, which includes the First, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth U.S. Coast Guard Districts. Note to § 165.2025 paragraph ( a
):
The boundaries of the U.S. Coast Guard Atlantic Area and the First, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth U.S. Coast Guard Districts are set out in 33 CFR part 3.
( b ) A naval vessel protection zone exists around U.S. naval vessels greater than 100 feet in length overall at all times in the navigable waters of the United States, whether the large U.S. naval vessel is underway, anchored, moored, or within a floating drydock, except when the large naval vessel is moored or anchored within a restricted area or within a naval defensive sea area.
( c ) The Navigation Rules shall apply at all times within a naval vessel protection zone.
( d ) When within a naval vessel protection zone, all vessels shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course, unless required to maintain speed by the Navigation Rules, and shall proceed as directed by the Coast Guard, the senior naval officer present in command, or the official patrol. When within a naval vessel protection zone, no vessel or person is allowed within 100 yards of a large U.S. naval vessel unless authorized by the Coast Guard, the senior naval officer present in command, or official patrol.
( e ) To request authorization to operate within 100 yards of a large U.S. naval vessel, contact the Coast Guard, the senior naval officer present in command, or the official patrol on VHF-FM channel 16.
( f ) When conditions permit, the Coast Guard, senior naval officer present in command, or the official patrol should: ( 1 ) Give advance notice on VHF-FM channel 16 of all large U.S. naval vessel movements; and
( 2 ) Permit vessels constrained by their navigational draft or restricted in their ability to maneuver to pass within 100 yards of a large U.S. naval vessel in order to ensure a safe passage in accordance with the Navigation Rules; and
( 3 ) Permit commercial vessels anchored in a designated anchorage area to remain at anchor when within 100 yards of passing large U.S. naval vessels; and
( 4 ) Permit vessels that must transit via a navigable channel or waterway to pass within 100 yards of a moored or anchored large U.S. naval vessel with minimal delay consistent with security.
Note to § 165.2025 paragraph ( f
):
The listed actions are discretionary and do not create any additional right to appeal or otherwise dispute a decision of the Coast Guard, the senior naval officer present in command, or the official patrol.
July 1 0 , 201 5

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building ground floor

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request for Extension of Exemption No. 9548 D Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2007

- 0040

Dear Sir/Madam,

Please accept this letter as Sun Country Airlines’ request to extend Exemption No. 9548 D , Regulatory

Docket No. FAA

- 2007

- 0040. The current exemption permits exemption from 14 CFR 47.49, 91.203(a)(b) and 121.153(a)(1) to the extent neces sary to allow temporary operations of its U.S registered aircraft in domestic operations following the incidental loss or mutilation of that aircraft’s airworthiness certification or registration certificate or both.

Sun Country Airlines is confident that granting an extension would not reduce the level of safety, nor have an adverse impact on the interest of the aircraft owners or government agencies. Sun Country Airlines asserts that granting this extension is in the public interest since it will allow Sun Country Airlines to continue to provide reliable and timely service to the traveling public by reducing the time that aircraft are

out of service.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Duane Franklund

Director Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Sun Country Airlines

651

- 389

- 9580 (Office)

651

- 389

- 9600 (Fax)

1300 Mendota Heights Road, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Corporate Headquarters 651.681.3900

- Reservations 800.359.6786

- Fax 651.681.3901