alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 155.1055 Training. ( a ) A response plan submitted to meet the requirements of § 155.1035 or § 155.5035 must identify the training to be provided to persons having responsibilities under the plan, including members of the vessel crew, the qualified individual, and the spill management team. A response plan submitted to meet the requirements of § 155.1040 must identify the training to be provided to the spill management team, the qualified individual, and other personnel in § 155.1040 with specific responsibilities under the plan including tankermen and members of the towing vessel crew. The training program must differentiate between that training provided to vessel personnel and that training provided to shore-based personnel. Appendix C of this part provides additional guidance regarding training.
( b ) A vessel owner or operator shall ensure the maintenance of records sufficient to document this training and make them available for inspection upon request by the Coast Guard. Records must be maintained for 3 years following completion of training. The response plan must identify the location of training records, which must be— ( 1 ) On board the vessel;
( 2 ) With the qualified individual; or
( 3 ) At a U.S. location of the spill management team.
( c ) A vessel owner or operator may identify equivalent work experience which fulfills specific training requirements.
( d ) The vessel owner or operator shall ensure that any oil spill removal organization identified in a response plan to meet the requirements of this part maintains records sufficient to document training for the organization's personnel. These records must be available for inspection upon request by the Coast Guard. Records must be maintained for 3 years following completion of training.
( e ) Nothing in this section relieves the vessel owner or operator from the responsibility to ensure that all private shore-based response personnel are trained to meet the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards for emergency response operations in 29 CFR 1910.120.
( f ) A training plan may be prepared in accordance with Training Elements for Oil Spill Response to satisfy the requirements of this section.
[CGD 91-034, 61 FR 1081, Jan. 12, 1996, as amended by USCG-2008-1070, 78 FR 60123, Sept. 30, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF NUPRO  INNOVATIONS INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         4,387,983
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        2,246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,401,818
<PP&E>                                         2,126,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (102,649)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,522,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,089,304
<BONDS>                                        1,250,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          12,617
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,849,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,522,208
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 114,891
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    699,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                65,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (650,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (650,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (650,517)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.06)


</TABLE>
Argued and submitted April 30,

affirmed December 16, 1992,

reconsideration denied February 10,

petition for review denied February 23, 1993 (315 Or 443)

#### ERIC RISE, *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE, *Respondent.*

(CA A68052)

843 P2d 997

Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Yuanxing Chen, Salem, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*266PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole granting him a ten-month reduction of his sentence. He argues that the Board violated the *ex post facto*provisions of the Oregon and federal constitutions by calculating his reduction under a rule not yet in effect at the time of his offense. OAR 255-40-025(2). Petitioner also contends that the Board was biased against him due to his service as an Inmate Legal Assistant.

The Board expressly found that it would have awarded petitioner the same 10-month reduction had it applied the old rule instead of the new rule. After the Board made its decision, petitioner declared that he did not need information about the appeal process, because he had worked as an Inmate Legal Assistant. One Board member responded that Inmate Legal Assistants bring most of the frivolous lawsuits.

 Petitioner was not disadvantaged by application of the new rule, a showing necessary to trigger *ex post facto*analysis. *See Howard v. State Board of Parole,*105 Or App 288, 292, 804 P2d 509, *rev den*311 Or 432 (1991). He has also failed to prove his bias claim. The Board member’s comment evidences neither an unfavorable predisposition about the outcome of petitioner’s hearing nor a bias against petitioner personally.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61028-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

TAMMY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DOLGENCORP, LLC d/b/a

DOLLAR GENERAL,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Court’s Order to Show Cause, entered May 8, 

2023. [DE 27]. 

On July 7, 2022, this Court entered its Scheduling Order, which required the parties to 

submit appropriate dismissal papers within ten (10) calendar days of notifying the Court that the 

case has settled. See [DE 12]. On April 22, 2023, a Mediator’s Report was filed, stating that the 

parties have settled this matter and would file a stipulation of dismissal within 30 days. See [DE 

26]. However, as of the date of this Order, a stipulation, notice, or motion for dismissal has not 

been filed with the Court. On May 8, 2023, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause, requiring 

that “no later than May 15, 2023, the parties shall either file the appropriate dismissal papers or 

show cause why those papers have not been filed.” [DE 27]. No response was filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that no later than May 23, 2023, the 

parties shall either file the appropriate dismissal papers or show cause why those papers have not 

been filed. Failure to comply may result in sanctions.

Case 0:22-cv-61028-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 16th day of May, 2023.

Copies to: 

Counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-61028-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 2 of 2
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: Maryland Department of Aging 

Name of ADRC and Healthcare Partners: 

Maryland Access Point of Baltimore City (MAP) and Johns Hopkins Community Physicians 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Stephanie Hull 

 410-767-1107 

 sah@ooa.state.md.us

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Guided Care®

Project Summary: 

The Maryland Department of Aging (MDoA) will collaborate with the Baltimore City Aging and 

Disability Resource Center known as the Maryland Access Point of Baltimore City (MAP) and 

Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) to develop an expanded Guided Care Program at 

selected JHCP practices. The internationally recognized Guided Care model provides 

comprehensive health care by physician-nurse teams for people with several chronic health 

conditions, specifically focusing on the 25% of Medicare patients at highest risk for using health 

services heavily. Scientific studies have shown that Guided Care improves the quality of care 

and suggests that it reduces overall health care costs. 

Goal/Objectives: 

This project will build on Maryland's Person Centered Hospital Discharge Program and the 

Money Follows the Person Demonstration. Under this initiative, a MAP Guided Care® nurse 

will work with JHCP to develop a plan of cross referrals, training and collaboration between the 

Guided Care® Program and MAP. The nurse will provide Guided Care® support for up to 25 

patients referred by MAP staff. Referrals will be individuals who are being discharged from 

hospitals or nursing homes and who are at high risk of readmissions and emergency room events. 

MAP staff and JHCP will convene a series of planning and training sessions to establish an ongoing system for cross referrals and collaboration between JHCP and MAP. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

Client and caregiver satisfaction, hospital readmissions, emergency room use and program 

effectiveness data will be collected through structured qualitative interviews and surveys to 

evaluate the feasibility of expanding the Guided Care® Program into additional MAP 

jurisdictions.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  |  |       |  |               
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | --------------
|/s/    THOMAS F. ROSE                             |  | Date: |  | March 16, 2005
|Name: Thomas F. Rose                              |  |       |  |               
|Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |       |  |               



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.519 What are the requirements for emergency lighting and power systems? ( a ) The operator must test and inspect the emergency lighting and power systems at least once a week to determine if they are in proper operating condition. If they are not in proper operating condition, then the operator must repair or replace their defective parts.
( b ) The operator must test, under load, each emergency generator driven by an internal combustion engine that is used for an emergency lighting and power system at least once per month for a minimum of 2 hours.
( c ) The operator must test each storage battery for the emergency lighting and power systems at least once every 6 months to demonstrate the ability of the batteries to supply the emergency loads for an 8-hour period. The operator must follow the manufacturer's instructions in performing the battery test to ensure the batteries are not damaged during testing.
# Chart1

UCEDD FY 2012 Annual  Reports Data

Technical Assistance 

# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Environmental Health Sciences Review 
Committee.
    Date: July 20-21, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS-South Campus, Building 101, Conference Room B, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Linda K. Bass, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Nat'l Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD 
EC-24, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1307.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS 
Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS 
Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic Research Education; 93.894, 
Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental Health 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: May 30, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-14328 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BUDRY MICHEL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 13

- 1123

[ December 12, 2018 ]

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara Anne McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No. 93

- 19586

CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahasse e, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

In State v. Michel , 43 Fla. L. Weekly S298 (Fla. July 12, 2018), the Florida Supreme Court quashed this Court’s decision in Michel v. State

, 204 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), and concluded that no Eighth

Amendment violation was shown in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *
**Exhibit 31(b)2**

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Art P. Beattie, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 3, 2006

/s/Art P. Beattie

Art P. Beattie

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
0-cr-06236-WPD Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2000 P
0-cr-06236-WPD Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2000 P
Tips to Help Your Senior Nutrition 

Program Run Smoothly

Planning

Create a plan.

A guiding document for the Senior Nutrition Program.

Develop a crisis plan.

A crisis can happen at any time. It is not a matter of if, but when, a crisis will 

occur.

Communications

Develop a marketing and communications plan.

Let your community know who you are and what you do.

Use word of mouth.

Promotion includes communication - conversations with family, friends, 

neighbors, and community members.

Administration

Manage finances.

Schedule reviews of program costs for peace of mind and to be ready for 

reporting time.

Keep detailed records.

Monitor the details of the program - show value and results to stakeholders.

Building Connections

Know your customers.

Ask customers what is important to them.

Build partnerships.

Partnerships can expand reach within the community.

Evaluation

Solicit feedback.

Check in with consumers - consumers have great suggestions for improvement.

Measure what matters.

Track key metrics and consider options that will help the program grow.

Source: Tips to Ensure Your Senior Nutrition Program Runs Smoothly and Efficiently

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of 

Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to 

express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
**Docket No. 2013 -**  **1068**
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Southern Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/David M. Ratcliffe

David M. Ratcliffe

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Thomas A. Fanning

Thomas A. Fanning

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

                       |

 

 

Date:  November 6, 2007
# A-3A-B NF-Comp beds