alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,962,512
<SECURITIES>                               130,590,166
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,826,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (309,746)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           148,769,734
<PP&E>                                      17,444,404
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,391,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             171,330,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       85,361,302
<BONDS>                                     45,995,099
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,281,631
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,692,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               171,330,607
<SALES>                                      5,024,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,402,497
<CGS>                                        3,461,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,461,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,333,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,241,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,367,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                   363,584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,003,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,003,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<FN>
Note: The Company has restated earnings per share to comply with the provisions
of SFAS No. 128. Basic earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31, 1997
was restated to $.31. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31,
1997 was restated to $.27.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Agency Information

# Section 1. General Funding Info

# Section 2. Compliance Indicator

# Section 3.Individuals Recieving

# Individual Services
[671 NE2d 1269, 648 NYS2d 872]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lorenzo Blakeney, Appellant.

Decided September 19, 1996

*1012APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson,*New York City *(Douglas W. Henkin*of counsel), *E. Joshua Rosenkrantz*and *Paul Skip Laisure*for appellant.

*Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney*of New York County, New York City *(David L. Jaffe*and *Mark Dwyer*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On November 4, 1992, defendant Lorenzo Blakeney was arrested with codefendant Shakira Fleming for allegedly selling crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. Twelve days later, on November 16, 1992, defendant was again arrested with Fleming for allegedly committing the nearly identical offense at almost the identical location.

After a jury trial, Supreme Court found defendant guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment from a minimum of five and one-half years to a maximum of eleven years. The Appellate Division, with one Justice dissenting, affirmed. We now affirm.

Defendant’s claim that he had never seen or known Fleming before his arrest on November 4, 1992, when the arresting officer directed that she be brought to stand next to defendant, opened the door to evidence tending to disprove his account. Thus, it rendered the People’s questions regarding the subsequent arrest with Fleming on November 16, 1992 relevant for "contradiction and response” with respect to the November 4, 1992 existence of their relationship and not simply to impeach his general credibility *(see, People v Betts,*70 NY2d 289, 295). The courts below did not err in holding that the defense counsel’s conduct during summation was not incompetent *(see, People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 799-800). Defendant’s claims that Supreme Court displayed prosecutorial bias and impermissibly shifted the burden of proof away from the People in the jury charge are unpreserved for this Court’s review.

The defendant’s remaining claims have been considered and are without merit.

*1013Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
§ 20.101 Scope. Except as otherwise noted, the rules of practice, procedure, and evidence in this part apply to the following subjects of administrative proceedings before the United States Coast Guard: ( a ) Class II civil penalties assessed under subsection 311(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(6)).
( b ) Class II civil penalties assessed under section 109 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9609(b)).
( c ) Suspensions and revocations conducted under 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77.
§ 207.310 Mississippi River at Keokuk, Iowa; operation of power dam by Mississippi River Power Co. ( a ) All previous regulations of the Secretary of War relating to the use of the Mississippi River for the generation of power by the Mississippi River Power Co., including the memorandum of March 24, 1908, approved by the Secretary of War, March 26, 1908, are rescinded, and the following regulations will govern the operation of the dam until further orders:
( b ) Excepting as specially provided in this section the normal flow of the river shall be discharged below the dam at all times of day and night.
( c ) The Mississippi River Power Co. shall not during the period of navigation raise the level of its pond behind the Keokuk Dam when the natural flow of the Mississippi River is falling or when such natural flow is less than approximately 64,000 cubic feet per second, which corresponds to a normal stage of 6 feet above low water at Keokuk, Iowa, except upon the written permission of the U.S. District Engineer in charge of this locality, such permit to state the period which such ponding may cover and the maximum variation in stage below the dam which may be caused by each ponding.
( d ) The granting of permits by the District Engineer shall be governed by the provision of the law authorizing the construction of the dam and its accessories, as follows: Sec. 2. That the withdrawal of water from the Mississippi River and the discharge of water into the said river, for the purpose of operating the said power stations and appurtenant works, shall be under the direction and control of the Secretary of War, and shall at no time be such as to impede or interfere with the safe and convenient navigation of the said river by means of steamboats or other vessels or by rafts or barges. * * * (33 Stat. 713)
( e ) The power company when proposing to raise or lower the pond, either under general authority or special permission, shall give due notice to the District Engineer or his authorized agent of its intention.
( f ) The power company shall hold all records relating to operations affecting the river discharge open to the inspection of the District Engineer or his authorized agent.
( g ) It shall be the duty of the district engineer or his authorized agent to observe closely and carefully the operations of the power company and to maintain in addition to such as may be maintained by the power company, such river and pool gages as may be advisable, and make from time to time such examinations as may be necessary for determining the effect of the operation of the power dam and accessories on the river channels.
( h ) The Department of the Army approves the method of regulating the flow below the Keokuk Dam by estimating the flow 24 hours in advance and maintenance of the stage corresponding to such flow as indicated by the river gage at U.S. Lock (the method employed during 1917). The general rules stated in paragraph (g) of this section are not intended to apply to unavoidable small compensating variations in pond level behind the dam inherent in such method of regulation.
[Regs., Jan. 12, 1918]
EXHIBIT
      32.2


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Christopher
      Ryan


Christopher
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### EUGENE KELLY, Respondent, *v.*THE MARIPOSA LAND AND MINING COMPANY and others, Appellants.

*Corporation*— *when enjoined from, transferring its property.*

Tlie plaintiff owned, and held as security, a large quantity of the stock of the Mariposa Land and Mining Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this State, to which a large tract of land had been conveyed, constituting the bulk of its property. A new company was afterward organized in California, to which it was proposed to convey all the property of the former corporation. The plaintiff, claiming that such transfer was made with the intent to render his stock worthless, and to deprive him of all control of the company, brought this action to restrain the defendant from carrying such transfer into effect, and to secure the appointment of a receiver. ■ *Held,*that a temporary injunction was properly granted and a receiver appointed.

Appeal from an order continuing an injunction and appointing a receiver.

*C. Bainbridge Smith,*for the appellants.

*Aug. F. Smith,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Brady, J., concurred.

Order modified, and as modified affirmed, with costs to abide the event of the action.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-22900-KMM

JESUS GABRIEL GELLA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY 

GROUP, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE OF MEDIATOR SELECTION

Pursuant to the Court’s Order referring this case to mediation [DE 13], the undersigned 

counsel have selected Gregory P. Holder to mediate this matter.

Dated this 10th day of October 2022.

/s/ Darren R. Newhart

Darren R. Newhart, Esquire

Florida Bar No.: 0115546

darren@newhartlegal.com

Newhart Legal, P.A.

14611 Southern Blvd. Suite 1351

Loxahatchee, FL 33470

Telephone: (561) 331-1806

Facsimile: (561) 473-2946

Counsel for Plaintiff 

/s/ Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III

Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III, Esquire

Florida Bar No. 110108

Skohlmyer@shepardfirm.com 

Shepard, Smith, Kohlmyer & Hand, P.A.

2300 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 100

Maitland, Florida 32751

Telephone (407) 622-1772

Facsimile (407) 622-1884

Attorneys for Defendant, Healthcare 

Revenue Recovery Group, LLC 

/s/ Matthew D. Bavaro

Matthew D. Bavaro, Esquire

Florida Bar No.: 175821

matthew@fight13.com

Loan Lawyers, LLC

3201 Griffin Road #100

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312

Telephone: (954) 523-4357

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 1:22-cv-22900-KMM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically filed on 

October 10, 2022, with the Clerk of the Court by using the electronic filing system. I further certify 

that the foregoing has been sent via electronic transmission to the following: Darren Newhart, 

Esquire at darren@newhartlegal.com, and Matthew D. Bavaro, Esquire at matthew@flight13.com 

(Attorneys for Plaintiff).

/s/ Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III 

Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III, Esq., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 110108

skohlmyer@shepardfirm.com

service@shepardfirm.com

Shepard, Smith, Kohlmyer & Hand, P.A.

2300 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 100

Maitland, Florida 32751

Telephone (407) 622-1772

Facsimile (407) 622-1884 

Attorneys for Defendant, Healthcare 

Revenue Recovery Group

Case 1:22-cv-22900-KMM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2022 Page 2 of 2
# AGENCY:

 Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

 Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review. 

# SUMMARY:

                         Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                     

# DATES:

 Submit comments on or before March 21, 2000. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline. 

*Copies:*                         Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.                     

# ADDRESSES:

                         Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20416; and OMB Reviewer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,                         Start Printed Page 3519                        Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     Entrepreneurial Development Management Information System (EDMIS).                 

*Form No:*                     641, 641A.                

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                

*Description of Respondents:*                     SBA Resource Partners.                

*Annual Responses:*                     120,000.                

*Annual Burden:*                     60,000.                

Jacqueline White,

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 00-1439 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0861
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Refuge Improvement Act of 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has published the Tewaukon National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment. This Plan describes how the FWS intends to manage the Tewaukon NWR and Wetland Management District for the next 10-15 years.

# DATES:

Submit written comments by July 6, 2000. All comments need to be addressed to Allison Banks, Refuge Planner, Land Acquisition and Refuge Planning, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486 DFC, Denver, Colorado 80225.

# ADDRESSES:

                        A copy of the Plan may be obtained by writing to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 9754 143                        1/2                         Avenue SE, Cayuga, ND 58013-9764; or download from http://www.r6.fws.gov/​larp/​.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Allison Banks, U.S. fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486 DFC, Denver, CO 80225, 303/236-8145 extension 626; fax 303/236-4792.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Tewaukon NWR Complex is located in southeast North Dakota. Implementation of the Plan will focus on adaptive resource management of glaciated prairie wetlands, tall and mixed grass prairie grasslands, riparian woodlands, and opportunities for compatible wildlife-dependent recreation. Habitat monitoring and evaluation will be emphasized as the Plan is implemented. Opportunities for compatible wildlife-dependent recreation will continue to be provided.

Dated: May 31, 2000.

Ralph O. Morgenweck,

Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.

[FR Doc. 00-14100  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
**Exhibit 31(d)1**

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Susan N. Story, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 4, 2006

/s/Susan N. Story

Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Alan R. Abrams, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: December 15, 2004 /s/ Alan R. Abrams   Alan R. AbramsChief Executive Officer