alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****

# **Oral Health and Older Adults**

*Did you know that among adults 65 years and older...?*

· Nearly all (96%) have had a cavity. 

· 1 in 5 have untreated tooth decay.[endnoteRef:2]   [2:  Dye BA, Thornton-Evans G, Xianfen L, Iafolla TJ. Dental Caries and Tooth Loss in Adults in the United States, 2011-2012. NCHS Data Brief, no 197. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015.] 

· About 2 in 3 (68%) have gum disease.[endnoteRef:3] [3:  Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the US Population: 2014 to 2060. Current Population Reports, P25-1143. Washington DC: US Census Bureau; 2014.] 

· 1 in 5 have lost all their teeth.[endnoteRef:4] [4:  Dye BA, Thornton-Evans G, Xianfen L, Iafolla TJ. Dental Caries and Tooth Loss in Adults in the United States, 2011-2012. NCHS Data Brief, no 197. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015.] 

Oral health is an essential but often overlooked health issue for older adults. While adults 65 and older can face unique oral health challenges, aging does not have to mean poor oral health and tooth loss. 

Nevertheless, the aging process as well as chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, arthritis, cancer) can result in dental problems. Prescription medications can cause a decrease in saliva (i.e., dry mouth) which irritates the soft tissues in the mouth, causing soreness and leading to infections. Without good saliva flow to clean your mouth, tooth decay and mouth infections can become much more common. Dentures can also affect the ability to eat nutritious food. People without teeth or with dentures often prefer soft, easily chewed foods instead of foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables that are usually more nutritious. Studies show that the risk of malnutrition is greater in adults 60 and older and those who have tooth loss.

The good news is that you can keep your teeth for a lifetime. Below are some simple steps you can take at home to ensure the best possible oral health as you age:

· Brush your teeth thoroughly twice a day with fluoride toothpaste, and floss once a day to remove dental plaque. If you are unable to brush after a meal or snack, rinse your mouth with water to get rid of food particles.

· Drink fluoridated water, if available.

· Don’t smoke or use other tobacco products. 

· Eat a balanced diet with fruits and vegetables and limit sugary snacks and drinks.

· Limit alcohol.

· If you have diabetes, work to maintain control of the disease. This will decrease your risk for other complications, including gum disease. Treating gum disease may also help lower your blood sugar level.

· If your medication causes dry mouth, ask your doctor for a different medication that may not cause this condition. If dry mouth cannot be avoided, drink plenty of water, chew sugarless gum, and avoid tobacco products and alcohol.

· If you have limited movement, consider using an electric toothbrush to make it easier for you to brush your teeth. 

· Visit your dentist at least once a year, even if you have no teeth or have dentures.

*Updated December 2021*1

# image1.jpeg
Order entered November 5 , 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00800

- CV

SUSAN E. HARRIMAN, Appellant

V.

MILDRED V. EHRENBERG , ET AL., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 11994



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 1, 2018 motion for an extension of time to file

a reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 8 , 2018

.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Main Street Trust,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Van A.
Dukeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/  Van A. Dukeman
-----------------------
Van A. Dukeman
Chief Executive Officer
March  12, 2004


                                       1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D22-0935

_____________________________

WILLIAM FORREST MORGAN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 28, 2022

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of habeas corpus as 

unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) 

(holding that, generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro 

se while represented by counsel). 

KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

William Forrest Morgan, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Part IV – Disputes & Appeals

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Part IV – Disputes & Appeals Part IV – Disputes & AppealsADR2022-02-16T15:32:06-05:00
			
			Part IV – Disputes & AppealsLike parties to private sector contracts, sometimes the Government and its contractors have differing opinions regarding the duties, rights, and obligations of each party under their contract. While most disagreements are resolved by negotiation before either party resorts to legal processes, a handful of controversies ripen into claims or appeals before an administrative tribunal or a court. As the chapters in Part IV explain, ADR is available from the beginning of a controversy all the way through the appellate courts. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
#### § 187.313 Effect of certificate of title.

A certificate of title is *prima facie* evidence of the accuracy of the information in the record that constitutes the certificate.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0479

FROM: Dallas Burkholder, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, US EPA

DATE: January 23, 2014

SUBJECT: Meeting with representatives from KiOR

EPA Attendees: Christopher Grundler

Karl Simon Paul Argyropoulos Ben Hengst

Paul Machiele

Dallas Burkholder

KiOR Attendees: John Kasbaum

Marty Fuller Troy Hiller

Jonathan Gledhill

Meeting Summary: EPA briefly explained our recent decision to grant petitions for reconsiderat ion of the 2013

cellulosic biofuel standard.

KiOR expressed concerns about the volumes of advanced and cellulosic biofuel in EPA’s proposed rule establishing the 20 14 RFS standards. They are concerned that the volume of advanced biofuels proposed would l ead to low RIN prices for advanced biofuels. KiOR believe cellulosic biofuel RINs are currently being priced at the value of advanced biofuel RINs plus the cellulosic waiver credit price, therefore low advanced RIN prices would reduce the sales price

for KiOR’s fuels and other cellulosic biofuels. They also expressed concern that by lowering the advanced and total biofuel standards EPA was increasing uncertainty about the RFS program as a whole in the investment markets making it more challenging for comp anies to raise capital.

KiOR expressed some concerns about the methodology that EPA used to set the cellulosic biofuel standard in our proposal and said they would provide more details on their concerns and

alternatives in their written comments. KiOR also requested that if EPA approved landfill biogas to generated cellulosic RINs that they either take that into account in the 2014 standards or not make the pathway approval effective until January 1, 2015 and account for that volume in the

2015 RVO

.

KiOR also provided a brief update on the status of their facility. They decided to shut down their facility during the first quarter of 2014 to make some facility modifications. It was more economical for them to shut down than to attempt these upgrades while the plant was running.

The low cellulosic RIN valu e was a factor in this decision , as the low RIN value further challenged the economics of running the facility. KiOR currently plan to complete the upgrades by the end of the first quarter. KiOR di d not provide a production estimate for 2014.
### Table 5-20 . Estimated Reduction in Incidence of Premature Adult Mortality due to the

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards in 2016 Occurring Above and Below the Lowest Measured Levels in the Underlying Epidemiology Studies a

a These estimates are rounded to two significant digits. It is important to emphasize that the scientific evidence does not support the existence of a level below which health effects from exposure to PM 2.5 do not occur. See Appendix 5E for more informati on. **Study and Lowest Measured Level (LML)**  **Total Reduced Mortality Incidence**  **Allocation of Reduced Mortality Incidence Below LML**  **At or Above LML** Pope et al. (2002), 7.5 μg/m 3 LML 4,200 1,100 3,100 Laden et al. (2006), 10 μg/m 3 LML 11,000 9,600 1,200
Case 9:22-cv-80803-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-80803-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 2 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-80803-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 3 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-80803-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 4 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-80803-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 5 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-80803-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit
23.4





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The
Board of Directors


TC
PipeLines GP, Inc., General Partner of TC PipeLines, LP:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-121537 and No. 333-141488) on Form S-3 of TC PipeLines, LP of our report
dated February 27, 2008 with respect to the balance sheets of Northern Border
Pipeline Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of
income, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in partners’ equity for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report
appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of TC PipeLines,
LP.








/s/
KPMG LLP





Omaha,
Nebraska


April
29, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36141-36142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14346]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Room 940. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573 within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.

    Agreement No.: 11305-007.
    Title: United Alliance Agreement.

    Parties:
    Cho Yang Shipping Company, Ltd.
    DSR-Senator Lines GmbH
    Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
    United Arab Shipping Company

    Synopsis: The proposed amendment would permit a party belonging to 
another agreement in the trade to obtain space from carriers operating 
under that agreement for its own use or sale to a member of this 
Agreement. It also lists other agreements, currently in effect, from 
which such space would be obtained and makes other conforming, 
administrative changes to the Agreement.


[[Page 36142]]


    Agreement No.: 011441-004.
    Title: NYK/NOS Joint Service Agreement.

    Parties:
    Wallenius Wilhelmsen Lines AS
    Nippon Yusen Kaisha

    Synopsis: The amendment deletes the Mediterranean, Black, Red and 
Arabian Seas from the geographic scope of the agreement, reduces the 
number of vessels operated, and restates/updates the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 011675-001.
    Title: DSEN/EMC-Slot Charter Agreement.

    Parties:
    DSR-Senator Lines GmbH
    Evergreen Marine Corp. (Taiwan) Ltd.
    Synopsis: The proposed modification reduces Evergreen's westbound 
slot allocation and establishes a 45-day notice period to terminate the 
agreement on or after September 30, 2000.

    Dated: June 2, 2000.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14346 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40208

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ABRAHAM HERNANDEZ-ALDAY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-409-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abraham Hernandez-Alday pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully 

present in the United States following removal; he received a below-guidelines 

range sentence of 30 months of imprisonment. 

The parties agree that, because Hernandez-Alday was sentenced to 

deferred adjudication for a prior burglary conviction, he was not convicted of 

an aggravated felony and, thus, the judgment improperly reflects that he was 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40208 Document: 00512894630 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2015
No. 14-40208

convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. 

Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 368 (5th Cir. 2009). Because HernandezAlday’s offense was a § 1326(b)(1) violation rather than a § 1326(b)(2) violation, 

we REMAND for the limited purpose of reforming the judgment to reflect the 

proper statute of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. In all other respects, the 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-40208 Document: 00512894630 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2015
Exhibit 31(b)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Mark J. Thomas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Servidyne, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: March 19, 2007 /s/ Mark J. Thomas     Mark J. Thomas    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 167.171 Off Delaware Bay: Eastern approach.

(a) A separation zone is established bounded by a line connecting the following geographic positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 38°46.30′ N | 74°34.45′ W |
| 38°46.33′ N | 74°55.75′ W |
| 38°47.45′ N | 74°55.40′ W |
| 38°47.35′ N | 74°34.50′ W |

(b) A traffic lane for westbound traffic is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographic positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 38°48.32′ N | 74°55.30′ W |
| 38°49.80′ N | 74°34.60′ W |

(c) A traffic lane for eastbound traffic is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographic positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 38°45.45′ N | 74°56.20′ W |
| 38°44.45′ N | 74°34.35′ W |

[CGD 97-004, 65 FR 12945, Mar. 10, 2000]
#### § 143.302 Hazardous location requirements on foreign vessels engaged in OCS activities.

Each vessel that is documented under the laws of a foreign nation and is constructed after April 2, 2018 must comply with the requirements of 46 CFR subpart 111.108 prior to engaging in OCS activities.

[USCG-2012-0850, 80 FR 16990, Mar. 31, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                             115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                       680
<INVENTORY>                                     14,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,939
<PP&E>                                          38,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,769
<BONDS>                                         22,348
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,038
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,932)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,004
<SALES>                                         70,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,707
<CGS>                                           54,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    536
<INCOME-TAX>                                       222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: February 4, 2014 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0776 

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS 

The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in related matters 1

• Therein 

the parties proffer that this matter has been settled and a Notice of Dismissal is forthcoming. 

WHEREFORE, the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings having been read and considered 

_ it be and is hereby ORDERED, as follows: 

1. Proceedings in the above captioned matter are STAYED until June 2, 2014; and 

2. The matter may be set for hearing on or after June 2, 2014 unless otherwise 

resolved prior June 2, 2014. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 See "Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings" SkyWest Airlines FAA 2012-0874, 0872, 0873,0869, 0868,0904,2013-

0617,0619. 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0776 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-· Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director, Government and Legal Affairs 

Sky West Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

MICHAEL L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

EMAIL: law@avialex.com 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3