alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14139]



[[Page 35915]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2560-000]


Louisville Gas and Electric Company/Kentucky Utilities Company; 
Notice of Filing

May 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Louisville Gas and Electric 
Company (LG&E)/Kentucky Utilities (KU) (hereinafter Companies), 
tendered for filing unexecuted unilateral Service Sales Agreement 
between Companies and Trans/Alta Energy Marketing (US) Inc., under the 
Companies' Rate Schedule MBSS.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14139 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

Power Tools for High Impact Leadership

This program is designed to provide you with cutting edge ideas and concepts to help 

you coach your team and clients to attain their next level of excellence. The speakers 

will introduce a toolkit to maximize your leadership impact and help your clients 

transform their conflicts. At this workshop, you will learn to leverage your leadership 

strengths to achieve the outcomes you seek, test out innovative approaches for 

coaching and conflict transformation, and walk away with practical tools, including an 

Epic Impact Plan, for immediate implementation in your practice.

Speakers: Melaina Spitzer

Founder, Inner Peacebuilding

Saleema Vellani

Founder, Innovazing, LLC

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy’s 

Alternative Dispute Resolution Office.

Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EDT (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GE-086

(DOE Forrestal Main Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

If you plan to attend in person and you need any special accommodations, or if you plan to attend this 

training online and you need any special accommodations, please contact cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov

no later than December 8, 2017. 

To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD-12 government ID badge, 

must register by email to cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov and provide 1) name, 2) citizenship, and 3) 

agency/employer by December 22, 2017. You do not need to register to call-in or participate online. 

To attend via WebEx, Go to http://doe.webex.com and enter the Meeting Number 904 967 049, then 

click “Join.” Enter your first and last name, your email address, and Adr1234 as the event password. 

Follow instructions for the audio (select the “I will call in” option for better reception).

To listen only via teleconference, please call 1-650-479-3208 and use access code: 904 967 049. Please

disregard the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit questions to the speaker during 

the program, please use online chat or email elisabeth.bissell@fema.dhs.gov. Materials for this 

presentation will be posted at http://www.adr.gov/events.html several days before the program.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22707-CV-WILLIAMS

PAYCARGO FINANCE LP,

Plaintiff,

v.

ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/ 

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Eduardo I. Sanchez’s

Report and Recommendation (DE 75) (“Report”) on Plaintiff PayCargo Finance LP 

(“PCF”) and Defendant Aspen American Insurance Company’s (“Aspen”) cross motions 

for summary judgment (DE 45; DE 47) (“Motions”). In the Report, Judge Sanchez

recommends that PCF’s motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in 

part and that Aspen’s motion for summary judgment be denied. (DE 75 at 2.) No 

objections were filed to the Report, and the time to object has passed.

Upon a careful review of the Report, the Motions, the record, and applicable law,

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Judge Sanchez’s Report (DE 75) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff PayCargo Finance LP’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 45) is 

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, summary

judgment is granted in Plaintiff’s favor on the issue of liability on its claim 

for breach of contract and is otherwise denied. 

Case 1:22-cv-22707-KMW Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2024 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. Defendant Aspen American Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment (DE 47) is DENIED.

4. Trial in this matter is RESET for July 15, 2024 at 400 North Miami Avenue, 

Courtroom 11-3, Miami, Florida. Calendar call will be held at 11:00 a.m. on 

July 9, 2024.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 12th day

of March, 2024.

Case 1:22-cv-22707-KMW Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2024 Page 2 of 2
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/bamagai/Desktop/p130078.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:50:37 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0078

Focus Ready Draft 12/3/2012

ENGINEER: Hall \ DDH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE:

OTHER USES:

.

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: personal protective equipment for the body

should be selected based on the task being performed and

the risks involved and should be approved by a specialist

before handling this product/ safety eyewear complying

with an approved standard should be used when a risk

assessment indicates this is necessary to avoid exposure

to liquid splashes, mists or dusts/ emissions from

ventilation or work process equipment should be checked

to ensure they comply with the requirements of

environmental protection legislation. In some cases, fume

scrubbers, filters or engineering modifications to the

process equipment will be necessary to reduce emissions

to acceptable levels

Respirator: in case of inadequate ventilation wear

respiratory protection. Respirator selection must be

based on known or anticipated exposure levels, the

hazards of the product and the safe working limits of the

selected respirator.

Health Effects: DANGER!| CAUSES EYE AND SKIN BURNS. MAY

BE HARMFUL IF ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN OR IF SWALLOWED.| |

do not breathe vapor or mist/ do not ingest/ do not get

in eyes or on skin or clothing/ use only with adequate

ventilation

TLV/PEL:

none established for the PMN
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/bamagai/Desktop/p130078.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:50:37 AM]

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Rapid

PBT rating: P1B1T2

Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing

(Testing desired)

Eco: 1 No releases to Water, XB Testing (No Testing

desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/bamagai/Desktop/p130078.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:50:37 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0078
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/bamagai/Desktop/p130078.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:50:37 AM]
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/bamagai/Desktop/p130078.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:50:37 AM]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.05-20 Petitions for rulemaking. ( a ) Any member of the public may petition the Coast Guard to undertake a rulemaking action. There is no prescribed form for a petition for rulemaking, but the document should provide some supporting information as to why the petitioner believes the proposed rulemaking is necessary and the document should clearly indicate that it is a petition for rulemaking. Petitions should be addressed to the Office of Regulations and Administrative Law (CG-LRA), U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7213, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7213.
( b ) The petitioner will be notified of the Coast Guard's decision whether to initiate a rulemaking or not. If the Coast Guard decides not to pursue a rulemaking, the petitioner will be notified of the reasons why. If the Coast Guard decides to initiate rulemaking, it will follow the procedure outlined in this subpart. The Coast Guard may publish a notice acknowledging receipt of a petition for rulemaking in the Federal Register.
( c ) Any petition for rulemaking and any reply to the petition will be kept in a public docket open for inspection.
[CGD 95-057, 60 FR 34148, June 30, 1995, as amended by USCG-2003-15404, 68 FR 37740, June 25, 2003; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35001, June 19, 2008; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38427, July 7, 2014; USCG-2018-0533, 85 FR 8172, Feb. 13, 2020]
### Test ID: 4-23-13 M-5 Run #1 **Value**

300.00 0.0000 200.00 

## Coke Plant

4A W eight of Acetone Blank (g) Volume of Acetone Used in Blank (ml)



## 4/23/2013

**Particulate A nalysis Data** 

Volume of Acetone Used 2A (ml)Test ID: 4-23-13 M-5 Run #1



### Value 1.1144 0.84 20.9 0 28.836 28.7969803 0.003600933 544.5 547.2 29.8 60 1.69 1.067 29.8 240 1.35 150.466 11.9 29.76 0.181 0.00017868354



### Value 155.5742631 63.94680 -14.4 -0.67781 26.3 1.240045 0.003601 0.058369 98.8723 

# Coke Plant **4/23/2013**

**Method 5 Parameter**
 p = Stack gas v elocity pressure (av g. sqrt  p - in. water) Cp = Pitot tube calibration coefficient

Md = Stack gas dry molecular weight, (lb/lb-mole) Ms = Stack gas (wet) molecular weight (lb/lb-mole) Bws = Stack gas moisture content % O 2 in Gas Stream %CO 2 in Gas Stream

 H@ = Orifice meter calibration factor, (in. water) Y = Dry gas meter calibration factor Pbar = Barometric pressure, (in. Hg) Total sampling time required for test (min) Tm = Absolute average dry gas meter temp (R). Ts = Stack gas absolute av erage temperature (R) Pm = Pressure at orifice meter (in. Hg) Ta = Sampling site ambient temperature, (°F)

I = % Isokinetic variation 

### Air Test Calculations  Hav g= average orifice meter differential Vm = Total sample volume from dry gas meter (dcf) Vlc Volume collected Ps = Absolute stack gas pressure (in Hg)

Vwc (std) = conv erted water v olume Total silica gel catch (ml) Vwsg (std) = conv erted silica gel water v olume Bws = fraction of gas that is moisture Vwc(std) Nozzle diameter (in) Area of Nozzle (ft^2)

Vm (std) = Volume of sample measured by DGM (dscf) Vs = Average stack gas v elocity Total impinger catch (ml)

## Value 11.7 0.01170 155.57426 63.946799 547.2 29.8 9.62 0.0036009 2120665.7 21.99 Green Anode Processed Tons/Hr

**Value** 0.3513 8.4309 0.0160 

## Combined Method 5 Parameter and Analy **tical** 

# Coke Plant Emission Calculations

**4/23/2013**

**Air Test Final Results** Total mg of Particulate Total g of Particulate Vm(std) Volume of Air Sampled by DGM (dscf) Vs Average stack gas velocity Ts Stack Gas R o 

### Pbar Barometric Pressure During Test (in Hg)

Emission Rate of Particulate lb Particulate/hr Emission Rate of particulate lb particulate/d Pounds of Particulate per Ton green anode processed Area of the Coke Scrubber (ft2) Bws Moisture in Stack Emissions Qstd Flow of Roof Vent Emissions (dscf/hr)
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Leonard Borow, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aeroflex Holding Corp., hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Holding Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Holding Corp.




/s/ Leonard BorowName:  Leonard BorowPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May 10, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aeroflex Holding Corp. and will be retained by Aeroflex Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Reclamation Consulting and
Applications, Inc. (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Gordon W. Davies, President of the Company, and Michael C.
Davies, Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

/s/ Gordon W. Davies
------------------------------------
Dated:  October 14, 2003                Gordon W. Davies
President

/s/ Michael C. Davies
------------------------------------
Dated:  October 14, 2003                Michael C. Davies
Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 99 (b)

                         TXU Transition Bond Company LLC
                 Statement of Collection Account Balances as of
                                December 31, 2004


The balances in the sub-accounts on deposit with the trustee as of
December 31, 2004 were:

                                        Series 2003-1          Series 2004-1
                                        -------------          -------------

General Sub-Account                    $26,718,305.44          $14,836,148.43
Capital Sub-Account                    $ 1,363,532.74          $ 1,419,315.98
Overcollateralization Account          $         0.00          $         0.00



REP Deposit Account*        $1,591,884.16


*  REP deposits are held in one account with a sub-ledger outlining the
respective amount of each REP's deposit attributable to each series of bonds.
Twenty-First Amendment to Employment Agreement






        
TWENTY- FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Twenty-First Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of March 1, 2012, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and John Hildebrandt ("Executive").


Recitals


		
	A)
	On June 1, 2001 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twenty prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:




Agreement




		
	1.
	Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides: 




3.1    Term. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on June 1, 2001 and shall continue until March 31, 2012 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.


is hereby amended, effective March 1, 2012, to provide as follows:


3.1    Term.  The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on June 1, 2001 and shall continue until March 31, 2013 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.


		
	2.
	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.




Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.


EXECUTIVE                            EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


John Hildebrandt                    By: ____________________


______________________                Name: Jose Luis Laparte    


Its: CEO & President
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Raymond Eshaghian, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of TMSF Holdings, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of TMSF Holdings,Inc. 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

     b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statementsfor external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
     c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

     a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation ; and 

     b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

/s/ Raymond Eshaghian   Raymond Eshaghian Chief Executive Officer March 31, 2005
#### PHILENA B. FISHER, as Administratrix, etc., of JOHN FISHER, Deceased, PHILENA B. FISHER and CAROLINE C. FRARY, Respondents, *v.*STANLEY A. BANTA, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment at Special Term. The action was brought to obtain a judicial construction of the wills of Albert Banta and of Charles Edward Banta.

The court was of opinion that all the material questions in the case had been disposed of on former appeals. (See 1 N. Y. S. C. [ T. *&*C.], 97; and 1 Hun, 610.)

*Morse & Wells,*for the appellant.

*W. W. Rowley,*for the respondent Fisher.

*De L. Crittenden,*for the respondent Frary.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to be paid by the appellant.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1335 Security Zone; Vessels Carrying Hazardous Cargo, Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: All waters within 500 yards, in all directions, of any vessel carrying hazardous cargo, as determined by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Columbia River, while such a vessel is located in the Sector Columbia River COTP Zone as defined in 33 CFR 3.65-15 and the COTP Columbia River determines that a security zone is necessary and enforcement of the security zone is practicable.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 165, Subpart D, no person or vessel may enter or remain in a security zone created by this section without the permission of the COTP Columbia River or his/her designated representative. Designated representatives are Coast Guard personnel authorized by the COTP Columbia River to grant persons or vessels permission to enter or remain in a security zone created by this section. Subpart D of 33 CFR part 165 contains additional provisions applicable to a security zone created by this section.
( 2 ) To request permission to enter a security zone created by this section, contact Coast Guard Sector Columbia River at telephone number 503-861-6212 or via VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz) or VHF channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
( c ) *Notification.* When a security zone is created by this section, one or more Coast Guard vessels will be present to enforce the security zone and the COTP Columbia River will issue a local broadcast notice to mariners.
[USCG-2009-1134, 76 FR 28317, May 17, 2011]
jQuery(window).on("load",function(){cssua.ua.ios&&7===parseInt(cssua.ua.ios,10)&&jQuery(".button-icon-divider-left, .button-icon-divider-right").each(function(){var i=jQuery(this).parent().outerHeight();jQuery(this).css("height",i)})});
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.53 General requirements. A device must: ( a ) Under the test conditions described in §§ 159.123 and 159.125, produce an effluent having a fecal coliform bacteria count not greater than 1,000 per 100 milliliters and no visible floating solids (Type I),
( b ) Under the test conditions described in §§ 159.126 and 159.126a, produce an effluent having a fecal coliform bacteria count not greater than 200 per 100 milliliters and suspended solids not greater than 150 milligrams per liter (Type II), or
( c ) Be designed to prevent the overboard discharge of treated or untreated sewage or any waste derived from sewage (Type III).
[CGD 73-83, 40 FR 4624, Jan. 30, 1975, as amended by CGD 75-213, 41 FR 15325, Apr. 12, 1976]
# Chart

Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Protection and Advocacy Agency - FY 2013 Program Performance Report

Clients' Living Conditions

# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# Sheet3