alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 183.41 Persons capacity: Outboard boats. ( a ) The persons capacity in pounds marked on a boat that is designed to use one or more outboard motors for propulsion must not exceed the lesser of: ( 1 ) The maximum weight capacity determined under § 183.35 for the boat minus the motor and control weight, battery weight (dry), and full portable fuel tank weight required by § 183.75; or
( 2 ) For boats with a maximum persons capacity less than 550 pounds, the maximum persons capacity determined in the following manner: ( i ) Float the boat with all its permanent appurtenances.
( ii ) Add, in normal operating positions, the dry motor and control weight, battery weight, and full portable fuel tank weight, if any, required by § 183.75 for the maximum horsepower capacity marked on the boat. Permanently installed fuel tanks shall be full of fuel.
( iii ) Gradually add weights along one outboard extremity of each passenger carrying area, at the height of the seat nearest the center of that area, but no higher than the height of the gunwale, and distributed equally forward and aft of that center in a plane parallel to the floorboards until the boat assumes the maximum list or trim, or both without water coming aboard.
( iv ) Compute the persons capacity in pounds using the following formula: Persons capacity = A/0.6 where A is the total of the weights added in paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section.
( b ) The maximum persons capacity in whole numbers of persons marked on a boat designed or intended to use one or more outboard motors for propulsion must not exceed the value obtained by adding 32 pounds to the lesser of the values determined in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2)(iv), dividing the sum by 141, and rounding off the result to the nearest whole number. If the fraction is less than one-half, round down to the next lower whole integer and if the fraction is equal to or greater than one-half, round up to the next higher whole integer.
[CGD 78-034, 45 FR 2030, Jan. 10, 1980, as amended by CGD 83-012, 49 FR 39328, Oct. 5, 1984; 50 FR 18636, May 2, 1985; USCG-2016-1012, 82 FR 16521, Apr. 5, 2017]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-21659-GAYLES/TORRES

JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant. 

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of 

Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“Motion”) [ECF No. 25]. The action was 

referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a 

ruling on all pretrial, non-dispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on any

dispositive matters. [ECF Nos. 2, 6]. On November 16, 2023, Judge Torres issued his Report and 

Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion be granted.

[ECF No. 27].

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Case 1:22-cv-21659-DPG Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court agrees with Judge Torres’s analysis 

and conclusion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’s Report and Recommendation, 

[ECF No. 27], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order 

by reference;

(2) Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED;

(3) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Defendant Commissioner’s decision denying 

Plaintiff’s eligibility for Social Security Disability Income Benefits is hereby 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to Defendant Commissioner to offer 

Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing, further evaluate the medical opinion 

evidence pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(b)(2), 416.920(b)(2), take any further 

action needed to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision.; and

(4) This shall remain CLOSED for administrative purposes.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 20th day of November, 2023.

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-21659-DPG Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2023 Page 2 of 2
Insert your content (text, images) here.

# image1.png
#### § 230.22 Limitations on actions during the NEPA process.

See 40 CFR 1506.1.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 5, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30114

Summary Calendar

 

NICO BENN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-388

--------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nico Benn appeals the district court’s denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition which challenged his post-removal-order

detention by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). 

The district court did not err in denying the petition. Gisbert

v. United States Attorney General, 988 F.2d 1437, 1440 (5th Cir.

1993), amended by 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). Benn’s postremoval-order detention was authorized under 8 U.S.C. 
No. 03-30114

-2-

§ 1231(a)(1)(C). Benn’s incomplete and conflicting statements to

the INS hampered the INS’s ability to effectuate removal and

served to extend the removal period of 8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(1)(A).

Balogun v. INS, 9 F.3d 347, 350-51 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1   STRATEGIC PARTNERS, INC.   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Strategic Partners, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  January 12, 2011/s/ Frank J. Weinstock
Frank J. Weinstock
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board
      of
      Directors


5G
      Wireless Communications, Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by
      reference of our independent registered public accounting firm’s report dated
      April 6, 2007 on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, and the related
      statements of operati ons,
      stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
      2005, included in 5G Wireless Communications, Inc.’s Form 10-KSB, into the
      Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos.
      333-130752).





/s/
      Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP


Squar,
      Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP


Newport
      Beach, California


April
      6,
      2007
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Michael Tokarz, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal Executive Officer of MVC Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:

 

1.                                     The Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

In the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal Executive Officer for MVC Capital, Inc.

 

 
| /s/   Michael Tokarz |    |
|----------------------|---------|
| Michael   Tokarz     |    |
|                 |    |
| Date:                | 5/16/16 |   |
|                      |         |  |

 

Scott Schuenke, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal Financial Officer, of MVC Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:

 

1.                                     The Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

In the capacity of the officer who performs the functions

of Principal Financial Officer for

MVC Capital, Inc.

 

 
| /s/   Scott Schuenke |    |
|----------------------|---------|
| Scott   Schuenke     |    |
|                 |    |
| Date:                | 5/16/16 |   |
|                      |         |  |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 165

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

#### § 165.1701 Port Valdez, Valdez, Alaska—safety zone.

The waters within the following boundaries are a safety zone—The area within 200 yards of any waterfront facility at the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Valdez Terminal complex or vessels moored or anchored at the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Valdez Terminal complex and the area within 200 yards of any tank vessel maneuvering to approach, moor, unmoor, or depart the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Valdez Terminal complex.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 13

Common Stock Prices

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Quarter                         1997                     1996
                         High          Low        High          Low
<S>                      <C>           <C>        <C>           <C>
First                    $12 3/4       11 1/4     $12 1/8       10 3/8
Second                    12 5/8       10 5/8      12 1/2       10 1/2
Third                     14 1/8       12 1/8      12 1/2       11
Fourth                    12 1/2       10 5/8      13           11 1/8

Dividends Per Common Share
<CAPTION>

Quarter                         1997                     1996
<S>                             <C>                      <C>
First                           $.10                     $.10
Second                           .10                      .10
Third                            .10                      .10
Fourth                           .10                      .10

</TABLE>


Principal Products

Lawter International, Inc. is the world's leading provider of specialty polymers
used to enhance the performance of printing inks and coatings.  Our products
form the backbone of printing inks, and they make it possible to apply inks and
coatings to paper, plastic, metal and other surfaces more quickly and accurately
and with faster drying.  They also make it possible for presses to run at higher
speeds using inks that require less pigment, produce less waste, and offer
better performance characteristics such as gloss, brightness, and rub or
scratch-resistance.

Our products include printing ink vehicles, slip additives and resins, as well
as additives for coatings, adhesives and rubber compounding.  Printing ink
vehicles are fluid and gelled compositions which provide to lithographic and
letterpress printing inks the ability to carry color onto a variety of printing
surfaces.  They influence quality, gloss, drying speed, adhesion, rub-resistance
and press speed.  Slip additives are used in printing inks to provide additional
surface slip and rub resistance to the ink film.  Synthetic and hydrocarbon
resins are used in the production of adhesives, liquid printing inks and
printing ink vehicles, rubber compounds, paints and various coatings to improve
durability, chemical resistance, appearance, adhesion and speed of drying.

We develop, produce and market products for ink manufacturers and other
customers using proprietary technologies and modern manufacturing facilities in
North America, Europe and the Pacific Rim.  Lawter was founded in 1940.
§ 20.704 Scheduling and notice of hearings. ( a ) With due regard for the convenience of the parties, and of their representatives or witnesses, the ALJ shall, as early as possible, fix the date, time, and place for the hearing and notify all parties and interested persons.
( b ) The ALJ may grant a request for a change in the date, time, or place of a hearing.
( c ) At any time after commencement of a proceeding, any party may move to expedite the proceeding. A party moving to expedite shall— ( 1 ) Explain in the motion the circumstances justifying the motion to expedite; and
( 2 ) Incorporate in the motion affidavits supporting any representations of fact.
( d ) After timely receipt of the motion and any responses, the ALJ may expedite pleadings, pre-hearing conferences, and the hearing, as appropriate.
Strafford

No. 7872

#### David A. Wilson and Marcia A. Wilson v. Melvin E. Came

December 16, 1977

*Burns, Bryant, Hinchey, Cox & Shea,*of Dover, by brief, for the plaintiffs.

*Fisher, Parsons, Moran & Temple,*of Dover, by brief, for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

Trial for assessment of damages, in accordance with a remand from this court, before *Mullavey,*J., resulting in a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $2,500. *See Wilson v. Came,*116 N.H. 628, 366 A.2d 474 (1976). Defendant appeals.

A review of the record reveals ample evidence to support the findings made and the verdict entered by the court and they must therefore stand. *New Bradford Co., Inc. v. Meunier,*117 N.H. 774, 378 A.2d 748 (1977).

*Exceptions overruled.*
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1154 Security Zones; Cruise Ships, San Pedro Bay, California. ( a ) *Definition.* “Cruise ship” as used in this section means a passenger vessel, except for a ferry, over 100 feet in length, authorized to carry more than 12 passengers for hire; making voyages lasting more than 24 hours, any part of which is on the high seas; and for which passengers are embarked or disembarked in the Port of Los Angeles or Port of Long Beach.
( b ) *Location.* The following areas are security zones: All navigable waters, extending from the surface to the sea floor, within a 100-yard radius around any cruise ship that is located within the San Pedro Bay area landward of the sea buoys bounding the port of Los Angeles or Port of Long Beach or designated anchorages within 3 nautical miles seaward of the Federal Breakwaters.
( c ) *Regulations.* Under regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, a person or vessel may not entry into or remain in the security zones created by this section unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Los Angeles—Long Beach (COTP) or a COTP designated representative. ( 1 ) Persons desiring to transit these security zones may contact the COTP at telephone number (310) 521-3801 or on VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) to seek permission to transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
( 2 ) When a cruise ship approaches within 100 yards of a vessel that is moored, or anchored, the stationary vessel must stay moored or anchored while it remains within the cruise ship's security zone unless it is either ordered by, or given permission from, the COTP Los Angeles-Long Beach to do otherwise.
( d ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70051, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
( e ) *Enforcement.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the security zone by the Los Angeles Port Police and the Long Beach Police Department.
[COTP Los Angeles-Long Beach 02-004, 67 FR 72563, Dec. 6, 2002, as amended by USCG-2011-0101, 77 FR 1027, Jan. 9, 2012]
§ 20.802 Admissibility of evidence. ( a ) The ALJ may admit any relevant oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence, unless privileged. Relevant evidence is evidence tending to make the existence of any material fact more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
( b ) The ALJ may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of prejudice, by confusion of the issues, or by reasonable concern for undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

LIORA SAMANDAROVA

PLAINTIFF(S) 

v.

HOOKAH EXOTIX LLC, et al.,

DEFENDANT(S). 

CASE NUMBER

 1:22−cv−22787−RNS

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Clerk's Default

 It appearing that the defendant(s) herein, is/are in default for failure to appear, answer, or otherwise plead

to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law.

Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

Alexandre Arkhipov

as of course, on the date January 24, 2023.

Angela E. Noble

CLERK OF COURT

By /s/ Mary−Yves Etienne

Deputy Clerk

cc: Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr

 LIORA SAMANDAROVA

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

CV−37 (10/01)

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, To Review a Program Project Grant Application.
    Date: January 25, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Chevy Chase, Palladian East and Center 
Rooms, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Arthur Schaerdel, Scientific Review 
Administrator, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/
Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1418 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
### COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

45 CFR Ch. VII

Semiannual Agenda of Regulations

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.

SUMMARY: The purpose for publishing this agenda is to gi ve notice of any regulatory activity by the Commission in order to allow the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process. The Commission will have no regulations under development during the 12-month period following publication of the agenda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on any items in the agenda, contact Kimberly A. Tolhurst, Acting General Counsel, U. S. Commission on Civil Rights, Suite 620, 624 Ninth Street NW., Washington, DC 20425, (2 02) 376-8351, TDD (202) 376-8116.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Executiv e Order 12866 “Regulatory Planning and Review” and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S. C. section 605); executiv e agencies are required to publish a semiannual regulatory agenda in the Federal Register

.

The regulations being considered by the Commiss ion are not “significant” rules within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and no regulatory impact anal ysis is required. The Commission has determined

### that the regulations under consideration will not im pose compliance costs or reporting burdens on the public, nor will the regulations have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, no r egulatory analysis is required.

NAME: Kimberly A. Tolhurst, Acting General Counsel.The 1 Regulatory Agendas

Commission on Civil Rights - Completed Action

Title Regulation Identifier Number Commission on Civil Rights--Update and Revision 3035-AA02

Commission on Civil Rights ( CCR ) RIN: 3035- AA02

View Related Documents

Title: Commission on Civil Rights--Update and Revision Abstract: The regulation updates and revises most of the Commission's current regulations, specifically 45 CFR 701, 702, 703, 705, and 706. 45 CFR 701 identifies the organization and functions of the Commission. 45 CFR 702 specifies the rules on hearings, reports, and meetings of the Commission. 45 CFR 703 identifies the operation and functions of State Advisory Committees. 45 CFR 705 identifies the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974. 45 CFR 706 identifies the ethical and other conduct and responsibilities of employees.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No CFR Citation: 45 CFR 701 to 703; 45 CFR 705 to 706 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 1975 to 1975(f); 5 USC 552(a); 5 USC 552(b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable: Action Date FR Cite Withdrawn 11/04/2011

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No Federalism: No RIN Information URL: www.regulations.gov Agency Contact: Kimberly Tolhurst Senior Attorney-Advisor Commission on Civil Rights 624 Ninth Street NW. Suite 620 Washington , DC 20425 Phone: 202 376 -8351 E- Mail: ktolhurst@usccr.gov