alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-14305-JEM/ BECERRA

TAMIKO N. PEELE AND TAMIKO N. PEELE,

INDIVIDUALLY ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

THROUGH ITS UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM,

REGION 21 AND ITS OFFICIALS THE CHAPTER 13

TRUSTEE, ROBIN R. WEINER, P.A., ERIK P. KIMBALL,

ROBIN R. WEINER, NANCY J. ARGULA, CLIFFORD J.

WHITE, III, DOES 1-3 INCLUSIVE, AND THE STUDENT

LOAN PROGRAM (SLP) IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND

OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL

Defendants.

_______________________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the United States of America’s Second Motion to 

Remove or Redact the Address of Bankruptcy Judge Erik P. Kimball from the Public Record. ECF 

No. [43]. Being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 

the United States of America’s Second Motion to Remove or Redact the Address of Bankruptcy 

Judge Erik P. Kimball from the Public Record is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court for the 

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida shall remove or redact Judge 

Kimball’s address from the copy of the return of service showing service upon Judge Kimball filed

at ECF No. [25], page 34. The parties are directed to not include Judge Kimball’s home address 

in any future filings in this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida the 8th day of September, 2022.

________________________________________ 

JACQUELINE BECERRA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:22-cv-14305-AMC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-14306-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS

EDUARDO CISNEROS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFETY HOLDINGS, 

Defendant.

________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Motion to Withdraw Counsel, filed by 

Attorney Antonio G. Hernandez, on April 12, 2023. (DE 43). The Motion cites irreconcilable 

differences between counsel and Plaintiff. The Motion complies with Southern District of Florida 

Local Rule 11.1(d)(3), which requires notice to be served on the client and opposing counsel, and 

a statement of the current mailing address of the client. Having considered the motion and the 

record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Motion to Withdraw (DE 43) is GRANTED. 

2. Antonio G. Hernandez, P.A. shall have no further responsibility in this matter and shall be 

removed from the CM/ECF notification system and from the certificates of service for all 

pleadings, correspondence, and orders. 

3. Plaintiff Eduardo Cisneros shall have until April 24, 2023, to secure new counsel, or to 

advise the court of his intent to proceed pro se in this matter. Plaintiff is cautioned that 

failure to comply with this deadline may result in dismissal of this action for failure to 

prosecute and/or failure to comply with court orders.

4. Until new counsel is secured, Defendant is DIRECTED to serve all papers on the Plaintiff 

at his last known address: 14 S. Glenwood Ave., Avon Park, FL 33825. 

Case 2:22-cv-14306-DMM Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

5. Attorney Antonio G. Hernandez must SERVE a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff within 

TWO (2) DAYS from the date of entry of this Order and confirm the Plaintiff’s receipt 

thereof. Counsel is further DIRECTED to file a certificate of service with the court 

indicating the date on which service was accomplished and the manner in which Plaintiff’s 

receipt of this Order was confirmed.

6. At this time, I decline to modify and/or extend any litigation deadlines as a result of 

counsel’s withdrawal. Should the need arise later, I will revisit this issue upon the filing of 

an appropriate motion, which must set forth specific facts to support a finding of good 

cause, and which must show diligent efforts to comply with the current schedule. 

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this 14th day of April, 2023.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

Case 2:22-cv-14306-DMM Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.875 Coquille River.

The draws of the US 101 highway bridge, mile 3.5 at Bandon, Oregon, need not be opened for the passage of vessels; however, the draws shall be restored to operable condition within 6 months after notification by the District Commander to do so.

[USCG-2014-0213, 80 FR 20439, Apr. 16, 2015]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61584-DIMITROULEAS/HUNT

GAYE MCNISH,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF REMAND; ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 

Judge Patrick M. Hunt (the “Report”) [DE 20], entered herein on November 2, 2023. The Court 

notes that no objections to the Report [DE 20] have been filed, and the time for filing such 

objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings 

in the Report [DE 20] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. 

Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. 

Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). 

 Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of 

the Report [DE 20] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees 

with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 20] is hereby ADOPTED AND APPROVED;

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 16] is GRANTED;

3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 17] is DENIED;

Case 0:22-cv-61584-WPD Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2023 Page 1 of 2
4. This case is hereby REMANDED for further consideration commensurate with the 

Report [DE 20]; and

5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 17th day of November, 2023.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Hunt

Case 0:22-cv-61584-WPD Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2023 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.1005 Chincoteague Channel.

The draw of the SR 175 Bridge, mile 3.5, at Chincoteague shall open on demand; except from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on the last consecutive Wednesday and Thursday in July, the draw need not be opened.

[USCG-2014-0483, 81 FR 21268, Apr. 11, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.460 Additional operational requirements for tank barges. ( a ) *Emergency steering capability.* The owner or operator of each tank barge shall not permit the barge to be towed unless, by November 27, 1997, the primary towing vessel has— ( 1 ) A steering gear system with a main power unit, an alternative power unit, and two remote steering gear control systems, except that separate steering wheels or steering levers are not required. The steering gear control systems must be arranged so that if the system in operation fails, the other system can be brought into immediate operation from a position on the navigating bridge; or
( 2 ) Twin screw propulsion with separate control systems for each propeller.
( b ) *Fendering system.* An owner or operator of a tank barge shall not permit the barge to be towed unless the primary towing vessel and any fleeting or assist towing vessels have a fendering system that is of substantial size and composition to prevent metal to metal contact between the towing vessel and the barge during maneuvering operations.
[CGD 91-045, 61 FR 39790, July 30, 1996; 61 FR 41685, Aug. 9, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.227 How is a public hearing or meeting reported? ( a ) After completion of a public hearing or meeting, the presiding officer forwards a report on the hearing or meeting to the Commandant (CG-5P) for docketing.
( b ) The report must contain at least: ( 1 ) An overview of the factual issues addressed;
( 2 ) A transcript or recording of the hearing or meeting; and
( 3 ) A copy of all material submitted to the presiding officer.
( c ) During the hearing or meeting, the presiding officer announces the information that the report must contain.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
# ToC

# A-2 Cases closed amt by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-2: p. &P	

# A-2 Cases closed amt by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant by Region for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-2: p. &P	

# All Settings Numbers & Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# All Settings Numbers

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# All Settings Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# NF Numbers & Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# NF Numbers

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# NF Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# BC Numbers & Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# BC Numbers

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# BC Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# Other Setting Numbers, Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# Other Settings Numbers

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P	

# Other Settings Percents

&"Arial,Bold"&16Table A-2: Cases Closed: Numbers and Percents by Type of Complainant for FY 2011	

Table A-2: p. &P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"FOIA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5fIWYGzL2L\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/foia\/\">FOIA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/foia\/embed\/#?secret=5fIWYGzL2L\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FOIA” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"5fIWYGzL2L\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 99(b)1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama
Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Charles D. McCrary,
President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for the
          quarter ended March 31, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
          Alabama Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Alabama Power Company.


                                             /s/Charles D. McCrary
                                              Charles D. McCrary
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alabama Power Company and will be retained by Alabama Power Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 207.170d Taylor Creek, navigation lock (S-193) across the entrance to Taylor Creek at Lake Okeechobee, Okeechobee, Fla.; use, administration, and navigation. ( a ) The owner of or agency controlling the lock shall not be required to operate the navigation lock except from 5:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily. During the above hours the lock shall be opened upon demand for the passage of vessels.
( b ) The owner of the lock shall place signs, of such size and description as may be designated by the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Florida at each side of this lock indicating the nature of the regulations of this section.
[Regs., July 17, 1973, 1522-01 (Taylor Creek, Fla.) DAEN-CWO-N]
(Sec. 7, 40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1)
[38 FR 21404, Aug. 8, 1973]
#### § 230.1 Purpose.

This regulation provides guidance for implementation of the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the Civil Works Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It supplements Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, November 29, 1978, in accordance with 40 CFR 1507.3, and is intended to be used only in conjunction with the CEQ regulations. Whenever the guidance in this regulation is unclear or not specific the reader is referred to the CEQ regulations. Appendix A provides guidance on processing NEPA documents except for those concerning regulatory actions. Appendix C (formally ER 200-2-1) has been added to provide guidance on preparing and processing a notice of intent to prepare an EIS for publication in the Federal Register for all types of Corps actions. 33 CFR part 325, Appendix B provides procedural guidance for preparing and processing NEPA documents for regulatory actions.
Pitch Perfect Messaging and Communications Training Activity

Leslie May-Chibani

Minuteman Senior Services

1

How Nutrition Services can Boost Your Bottom Line

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

2

      Impacting the Triple Aim

Improve Member Experience 

Support Pilgrim’s Growth and Retention of Members

Improve Member Outcomes

Impact Outcome Measures, including Readmission Rates 

Improve Member Activation /Behavior Change 

Cost Effective Delivery 

Deliver Low Cost Interventions with Proven Outcomes 

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

3

Enhanced Nutrition Services

In-Home Registered Dietitian Consult  

Decrease Malnutrition Risk

Nutritious Meals

Address Food Insecurity 

Issues

Care Manager

Improve Medical Dietary 

Compliance

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

4

Nutrition’s Readmission Rates 

30-day hospital readmission rate, minuteman-area Seniors

Impact of Minutemen Dietary Consultation:

13% of all Medicare beneficiaries within Minutes service area. 

16% of Seniors at nutritional risk receiving Minutemen Meals-on-Wheels (superscript 5)

9% Seniors at Nutritional risk receiving Minutemen Meals-on-wheels and Dietary Consultation (superscript 5)

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

5

Member Profiles/Target Population

Pilgrim Health

200K Total Members

95% Medicare Advantage beneficiaries

60% Cardiac diagnoses

40% Diabetes diagnoses

Minuteman

1715 Vulnerable Seniors

10% Dual Eligible

60% Hypertension 

17% CHF

28 % Diabetes

28% SNF Eligible

52% Take 9 + Medications

67% At Risk for Food Insecurity upon Intake 

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

6

Cost Savings 

Small Investment Per Member Per Month 

90 Day Intervention including 2 Meals per Day

Impact Total Cost of Care over Lifetime 

Cost Savings : $17,000 per Hospital Readmission

Outcome Measures:

Hospital Readmissions/Emergency Department Use

Medical Dietary Compliance (Cardiac/Diabetes) 

Cardiovascular Deaths 

Social Determinants of Health 

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

7

26 Crosby Drive, Bedford, MA 01730888-222-6171

www.minutemansenior.org

elderinfo@minutemansenior.org

THANK YOU!

www.minutemansenior.org

www.minutemansenior.org

Final Slide

8

# image3.png

# image2.jpeg

# image4.jpeg

# image5.JPG

# image1.jpeg
1

Background and Purpose

A. Goal: 

To further enhance collaborative community malnutrition transitions of care for recently discharged home

delivered meal (HDM) recipients at risk for malnutrition through high-value nutrition care interventions

provided through registered dietitian nutritionists (RDN) home visitations.

B. Objectives: 

• Increase post-acute care generated malnutrition referrals to the Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) HDM

program.

• Integrate bi-directional closed-loop malnutrition-focused intra- and inter-organizational

communication pathways for aging services and healthcare entities.

• Demonstrate the added-value of an RDN in-home comprehensive malnutrition assessment.

• Characterize HDM recipients’ nutritional status and social determinants of health (SDoH) including

Medicaid recipients.

C. Overview of Project: 

The University of Utah in partnership with Utah AAA, Utah State Department of Health and Human Services 

as well as other key stakeholders received a 2019 Administration for Community Living Nutrition Innovations 

Grant to implement an added-value collaborative malnutrition-focused transitions of care process aimed 

at breaking the cycle of malnutrition and re-hospitalization. This project will enhance healthcare and

community partnerships to test an innovative evidence-based program in demonstrating the value of

aging services network in addressing malnutrition. 

D. Project Results: 

• The integration of bi-directional communication between the AAA and healthcare entities provided 

improved malnutrition educational and therapeutic coordination. 

• The incorporation of the social determinants of health into the Comprehensive Malnutrition Assessments 

(CMA) Provided a more in-depth insight to characterize the needs of HDM recipients. 

• The more in-depth CMA provided the RDN with data to develop more actionable nutrition therapy and 

follow-up which resulted in notable improvements in meeting estimated nutritional needs, physical 

nutritional status, fall risk, and timed get-up and go for the intervention group compared to controls.

This project was supported, in part by grant number 90INNU0014, from the Administration for Community

Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking

projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of

view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
#### Beverleys v. Holmes.

Argued Monday, December 6th, 1813.

1. Assumpsit — Declaration—Allegations of ConsideraTM tion.* — The plaintiff in assumpsit cannot recover without setting forth, in his declaration, a consideration to support the promise.

2. Contract — Agreement to Deliver Bonds — Consideration Necessary. — A written agreement, not nnder seal, to deliver bonds to a certain amonnt, must be considered nudum pactum, if no consideration for the contract be stated on Its face, or disclosed by testimony.

See 1 Bac. 112, (Wilson’s edition) and the cases there cited.

This was an action of assumpsit, upon a writing not under seal, in the following words : “Two months after date, we ^promise to deliver to Hugh Holmes, E)sq. or his order, Augusta bonds the amount of fourteen hundred and fifty dollars, payable in eighteen months from the 14th of October last. March 27th 1806.

“Carter & Peter Beverley. ”

The declaration contained two counts. In the first, the writing was specially declared upon, without setting forth any consideration for the promise. The second was for money had and received, in the usual form. The defendants pleaded that they did not assume, &c. The jury found for the plaintiff the sum of one thousand four hundred and fifty dollars, with interest from the 15th day of April 1807, until paid, subject to the opinion of the court on a question of law, whether the writing filed, (the execution of which, and also the existence of the partnership stated in the declaration, was admitted,) “the same being the only evidence before the jury,” was proper evidence in support of the declaration, so as to entitle the plaintiff to recover ?

The County Court was of opinion that the law on the verdict was for the plaintiff ; and, its judgment being affirmed by the Superior Court of law, the defendants obtained a writ of supersedeas from a judge of this court.

Williams, for the plaintiff in error.

Wirt, Contra.

Wednesday, December 8th, 1813,

*

See generally, monographic *note*on “Assumpsit” appended to Kennaird v. Jones, 9 Gratt. 183: mono-graphic *note*on "Consideration” appended to Jones v. Obenchain, 10 Gratt. 259.

The principal case is also cited in Farmer’s Bank v. Clarke, 4 Leigh 610.

JUDGE) ROANE)

pronounced the court’s opinion, that the first count in the declaration is defective in this, that no consideration is set out to support the assumpsit therein mentioned ;(1) and that no recovery ought to be had upon the second ; the case presented to the court by the jury being that of a nudum factum, on which no recovery can be sustained, and that the judgment of the said County Court is therefore erroneous.___

Both judgments reversed, and judgment entered that the *defendant in error (who was plaintiff in the County Court) take nothing, &c. (2)

(1)

 See Hall v. Smith, Young, and Hyde, 3 *Munf.*

(2)

 The court (on the 17th of December) set aside this judgment and re-considered the case: but afterwards, viz. on the 29th of March 1814, pronounced the same opinion. — Note in Original Edition.