alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4905

To amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 to authorize

a homeowner to recover treble damages from the homeowner’s mortgage

escrow servicer for failure by the servicer to make timely payments

from the escrow account for homeowners insurance, taxes, or other

charges.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 2000

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of

1974 to authorize a homeowner to recover treble damages from the homeowner’s mortgage escrow servicer for

failure by the servicer to make timely payments from

the escrow account for homeowners insurance, taxes, or

other charges.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeowners’ Escrow

5 Payments Assurance Act’’.
2

•HR 4905 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREBLE DAMAGES FOR FAILURE TO MAKE PAY2 MENTS FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT.

3 Section 6(f) of the Real Estate Settlement Proce4 dures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2605(f)) is amended—

5 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph

6 (A) and inserting the following new subparagraph:

7 ‘‘(A)(i) except as provided in clause (ii),

8 any actual damages to the borrower as a result

9 of the failure; or

10 ‘‘(ii) in the case of an action for a failure

11 to comply with the requirements of subsection

12 (g), 3 times any such actual damages; and’’;

13 and

14 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph

15 (A) and inserting the following new subparagraph:

16 ‘‘(A)(i) except as provided in clause (ii),

17 any actual damages to each of the borrowers in

18 the class as a result of the failure; or

19 ‘‘(ii) in the case of an action for a failure

20 to comply with the requirements of subsection

21 (g), 3 times any such actual damages; and’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4814 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4814

To make illegal the sale, share, or transfer of information acquired on 
       the Internet with a pledge that it would not be released.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2000

  Mr. Bachus (for himself and Mr. Delahunt) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make illegal the sale, share, or transfer of information acquired on 
       the Internet with a pledge that it would not be released.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SALE OF PRIVATE INFORMATION.

    It shall be considered an unfair practice in or affecting commerce 
which violates section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 
45) for a person to sell on the Internet information such person 
acquired with a pledge that the information would be kept private and 
not released or for a person to share or transfer to another such 
information on the Internet.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

130194(59)(68) Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

THE GREATER BIBLE WAY TEMPLE OF 

JACKSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 130194 

v COA: 250863 

Jackson CC: 01-003614-AS 

CITY OF JACKSON, JACKSON PLANNING 

COMMISSION, and JACKSON CITY COUNCIL, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Michigan Municipal 

League for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is 

GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 25, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, Douglas
R. Muir, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended February 3, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas R. MuirDouglas R.
      MuirChief Financial
      Officer


Date: April 17, 2008

This
certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
therein by reference.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy Kreme Doughnuts,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the Form
10-Q for June 30,  1998,  and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000041091
<NAME> GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                              9,828,795
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                              310,204
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,235,645
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                               1,108,473
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        12,483,117
<COMMON>                                                 344,250
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                              1,930,239
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                    1,724,136
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                         3,998,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    689,250
<PREFERRED>                                              116,568
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                   2,897,241
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       151,850
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                145,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           224,035
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               86,065
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                             412
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                         4,174,071
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                         12,483,117
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                              2,210,457
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                     178,643
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             1,666,849
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                             1,845,492
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                  364,965
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                        25,218
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                           390,183
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 143,729
<NET-INCOME>                                             246,454
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                3,864
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                            242,590
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                 264,400
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                      0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                   516,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        




</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.H., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.H., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 169 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.D.D.H., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: A.H., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 170 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of August, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Unity Wireless Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ilan Kenig, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Ilan Kenig

/s/ Ilan Kenig

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



March 26, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4739 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4739

 To amend section 308 of the Clean Air Act to authorize the mandatory 
licensing of patents on reformulated gasoline and other fuels, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2000

 Mr. Kucinich (for himself, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Pallone, and Mr. Barrett 
of Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 308 of the Clean Air Act to authorize the mandatory 
licensing of patents on reformulated gasoline and other fuels, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lower Gasoline Prices through 
Technology Access Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. PATENTS ON FUELS.

    Section 308 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7608) is amended by 
striking ``or 202'' and inserting ``202, or 211''.
                                 <all>
```
Harassment and Bullying Quiz

1. If a coworker or supervisor gets frustrated and loudly says “You did this wrong!” then they are a bully. 

Raising your voice or yelling even once is considered bullying behavior.

❏ TRUE ❏X FALSE 

2. If a coworker has established a pattern of mean-spirited comments and talking behind your back, the 

best solution is:

a) Don’t make a fuss—it’s just words, and words can’t really hurt you.

b) Find a time to speak to your coworker and ask them to stop their

hurtful comments and gossip.

c) Ask a witness to be present if you are worried about receiving a

hostile response when you speak to your coworker.

d) Both (b) and (c) above.

3. As long as you do not participate in bullying behavior at work, you have no further responsibilities. It 

would just make things worse if you got involved.

❏ TRUE X❏ FALSE

4. If you are being bullied, it’s probably your fault. If you just stop doing those things that annoy the 

bully, he or she will be sure to leave you alone.

❏ TRUE X❏ FALSE

5. What are some of the sources of workplace bullying?

a) Bullies can be bored or feel underappreciated and use bullying for entertainment or to feel more 

powerful.

b) Bullies often pick on coworkers who they feel threatened by or have a personality conflict with.

c) Bullies can target coworkers or subordinates they feel are not “pulling their own weight” or 

contributing adequately to the team effort.

d) All of the above. Individuals who are protected against retaliation include those who object to 

unwelcome behavior, make a complaint, or participate in an investigation.

6. If someone accuses you of bullying, you might as well quit your job right then, because no one will 

listen to your side of the story or believe that you can ever work with that person again.

❏ TRUE X❏ FALSE 

7. In mild cases of bullying, a conversation between the parties can often clear the air and provide a basis 

for improved relationships going forward. What are some of the solutions that can used for solving more 

serious situations?

a) An organization’s discipline process, up to and including termination in severe cases.

b) EEOC complaint

c) Promoting the bully to get them out of their current department.

d) Both (a) and (b) above.

8. If a bunch of subordinates get together and agree to be disrespectful and not do what their boss says, 

this can be considered bullying. Even those with authority in an organization can be victims.

X❏ TRUE ❏ FALSE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENERGEN CORPORATION FOR THE SIX-MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000277595
<NAME> ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      280,688
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    260,346
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         146,648
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,689
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 702,371
<COMMON>                                           262
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      143,251
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            124,955
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 268,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           194,622
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             121,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,855
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 116,426
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  702,371
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      279,944
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             7,374
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     230,391
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     237,765
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         49,553
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (8,471)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  44,509
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,801
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,708
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   33,708
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         7,285
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,551
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           7,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40


</TABLE>
§ 97.6 Additions and exceptions. ( a ) For classes of grants and grantees subject to this part, Federal agencies may not impose additional administrative requirements except in codified regulations published in the Federal Register.
( b ) Exceptions for classes of grants or grantees may be authorized only by OMB.
( c ) Exceptions on a case-by-case basis and for subgrantees may be authorized by the affected Federal agencies.
The Tennessee Commission on Aging & Disability 

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year capacitybuilding grant are to:

• Develop capacity in areas with no or 

limited evidence-based program 

infrastructure to introduce and deliver 

evidence-based falls prevention 

programs within underserved geographic 

areas and/or populations; and

• Develop sustainability strategies to 

support the proposed programs during 

and beyond the grant period.

The Tennessee Commission on Aging & Disability

(TCAD) and its partners will: 

• Recruit, train, and maintain 60 SAIL 

leaders

• Leverage existing falls prevention 

programs

• Expand geographic reach of SAIL 

• Strengthen Tennessee’s aging network 

system

• Build capacity of SAIL leaders to receive 

payments through health insurance 

providers

• Establish innovative funding streams

• Leverage partnerships to secure low/no 

cost resources

• Embed monitoring within SUA processes. 

Proposed Interventions

• Stay Active and Independent for Life 

(SAIL)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, TCAD will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• 9 Area Agencies on Aging and Disability

• TN Falls Coalition

• TN Department of Healthy, Division of 

Family Health and Wellness/Injury and 

Violence Prevention

• Johnson City Medical Center

• Tivity Health

Anticipated Results 

The TCAD and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 
2 of 2

This project is supported by the Prevention and Public Health Fund 2018.

• Expand geographic reach of SAIL by 

implementing in 60 new sites within 29 

(60%) of 48 rural counties with no falls 

prevention program

• Establish 60 new SAIL sites

• Train 60 new certified SAIL leaders

• 3,330 SAIL participants, including 1,665

(55%) new rural participants

• Distribute 70 “SAIL in TN” toolkits

• Develop branded, state-specific 

marketing and outreach materials

• Create one centralized agency 

responsible for SAIL initiatives statewide

• Develop standardized fidelity monitoring 

tools

• Develop a branded SAIL toolkit, 

standardized monitoring program, public 

awareness campaign, and falls 

prevention website. 

Contact:

Sidney Schuttrow

Tennessee Commission on Aging & Disability

Sidney.Schuttrow@tn.gov

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4884 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 880
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4884

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2000

  Received, read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                           September 29, 2000

  Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of September 29 
    (legislative day, September 22), 2000 by Mr. Thompson, without 
                               amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ``William S. 
                   Broomfield Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 
West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, and known as the Royal Oak Post 
Office, shall be known and designated as the ``William S. Broomfield 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William S. Broomfield Post 
Office Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 880

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ``William S. 
                   Broomfield Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 2000

  Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of September 28 
                 (legislative day, September 22), 2000
```
Arthur Andersen

                                                                 EXHIBIT 15(b)












May 9, 2000


Georgia Power Company
241 Ralph McGill Boulevard, NE
Atlanta, Georgia  30308

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that  Georgia  Power  Company  has  incorporated  by  reference  in
Registration  Statement  333-75193 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2000  which  includes  our  report on Georgia  Power  Company  dated May 9, 2000
covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant
to Regulation C of the  Securities  Act of 1933 (the "Act"),  such report is not
considered  a part of the  Registration  Statement  prepared or certified by our
firm or a report  prepared  or  certified  by our firm  within  the  meaning  of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP