alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                       Alexander & Alexander Services Inc.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         753
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                   26
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,336
<PP&E>                                         390
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,027
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          43
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                     412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,922
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               967
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                88
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            48
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   48
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $0.62
        


</TABLE>
#### § 795.100 Introductory statement.

This part contains the Department of Labor's (the Department) general interpretations for determining whether workers are employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act). See 29 U.S.C. 201-19. These interpretations are intended to serve as a “practical guide to employers and employees” as to how the Department will seek to apply the Act. *Skidmore* v. *Swift & Co.,* 323 U.S. 134, 138 (1944). The Administrator of the Department's Wage and Hour Division will use these interpretations to guide the performance of their duties under the Act, unless and until the Administrator is otherwise directed by authoritative decisions of the courts or the Administrator concludes upon reexamination of an interpretation that it is incorrect. To the extent that prior administrative rulings, interpretations, practices, or enforcement policies relating to determining who is an employee or independent contractor under the Act are inconsistent or in conflict with the interpretations stated in this part, they are hereby rescinded. The interpretations stated in this part may be relied upon in accordance with section 10 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. 251-262, notwithstanding that after any act or omission in the course of such reliance, the interpretation is modified or rescinded or is determined by judicial authority to be invalid or of no legal effect. 29 U.S.C. 259.
#### WILLIAM REYNOLDS, Respondent, *v.*JOHN GILCHREST and another, Appellants.

The appeal papers in the case contain a notice of appeal from an order of the county judge of Westchester county, made in proceedings supplementary to execution founded on a judgment entered in this action, said order refusing to dismiss such proceedings, and sustaining an attachment against the defendant Gilchrest, for an alleged contempt in said proceedings.

The General Term found in the appeal papers no such order, and dismissed the appeal, without costs.

*Wm. F. Purdy,*for the appellant, Gilchrest.

*J. S. Millard,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J;, Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Douglas Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 /s/ Douglas
Roth
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
 February
6, 2009
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Coglon, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Richard Coglon

/s/ Richard Coglon
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

July 28, 2003



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Knight, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Robert Knight

/s/ Robert Knight
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

July 28, 2003
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"FAR Provisions Pertinent to ADR","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Tm5ml6nv1s\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/far\/\">FAR Provisions Pertinent to ADR<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/far\/embed\/#?secret=Tm5ml6nv1s\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“FAR Provisions Pertinent to ADR” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"Tm5ml6nv1s\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 102 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States has a moral responsibility to meet the needs of those persons, groups, and communities 

that are impoverished, disadvantaged, or otherwise in poverty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. BACA, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. HINCHEY, 

Mr. OLVER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SIRES, 

Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. RUSH, Ms. WOOLSEY, 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Mr. 

SCHIFF) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States 

has a moral responsibility to meet the needs of those 

persons, groups, and communities that are impoverished, 

disadvantaged, or otherwise in poverty. 

Whereas poverty can be seen as a deep, structural problem 

that implicates our value system and our educational and 

economic institutions; 

Whereas poverty may be defined as the lack of basic necessities of life such as food, shelter, clothing, health care, 

education, security, and opportunity; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 102 IH 

Whereas policy initiatives addressing poverty have not kept 

pace with the growing needs of millions of Americans; 

Whereas many experts believe that the lack of an equitable 

distribution of housing choices across the country leads 

to isolation and concentrated poverty; 

Whereas there were 37,300,000 people living in poverty in 

2007; 

Whereas experts estimate that between 7,000,000 to 

10,000,000 people in the United States will fall below the 

Federal poverty line as a result of the current recession; 

Whereas even during a period of economic growth between 

2001 and 2007, an additional 4,000,000 people in the 

United States fell into poverty; 

Whereas in 2007, 13,300,000 children under the age of 18 

lived in poverty; 

Whereas in 2007, 15,600,000 persons lived in extreme poverty, defined as people with incomes lower than one-half 

of the established Federal poverty guideline; 

Whereas 45,700,000 Americans were living without health insurance in 2007; and 

Whereas in 2009, a family of 4 was considered poor under 

the United States Census Bureau’s official measure if the 

family’s income was below $21,834: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 

3 United States should set a national goal of cutting poverty 

4 in half over the next 10 years. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
§ 154.1017 Response plan submission requirements. ( a ) The owner or operator of an MTR facility identified only in § 154.1015(b), or designated by the COTP as a substantial harm facility, shall prepare and submit to the cognizant COTP a response plan that meets the requirements of § 154.1030, § 154.1040, § 154.1045, or § 154.1047, as appropriate. This applies to: ( 1 ) A mobile MTR facility used or intended to be used to transfer oil to or from a vessel with a capacity of 250 barrels or more; and
( 2 ) A fixed MTR facility specifically designated as a substantial harm facility by the COTP under § 154.1016.
( b ) The owner or operator of an MTR facility identified in § 154.1015(c) or designated by the COTP as a significant and substantial harm facility shall prepare and submit for review and approval of the cognizant COTP a response plan that meets the requirements of § 154.1030, § 154.1035, § 154.1045, or § 154.1047, as appropriate. This applies to: ( 1 ) A fixed MTR facility capable of transferring oil, in bulk, to or from a vessel with a capacity of 250 barrels or more; and
( 2 ) An MTR facility specifically designated as a significant and substantial harm facility by the COTP under § 154.1016.
( c ) In addition to the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the response plan for a mobile MTR facility must meet the requirements of § 154.1041 subpart F.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Initiating the Agency-Level Protest","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lYMfLvpcAQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/09-ialp\/\">Initiating the Agency-Level Protest<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/09-ialp\/embed\/#?secret=lYMfLvpcAQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Initiating the Agency-Level Protest” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"lYMfLvpcAQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 6, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10398

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

MANUEL D. LUJAN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:03-CR-47-10 

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel D. Lujan appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for an extension of time to file a late appeal from his

conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Lujan’s

motion for leave to file an untimely notice of appeal was not

filed within the 40-day period prescribed by FED. R. APP. P.

4(b)(4). Therefore, the district court was without authority to

extend the appeal period, and Lujan had no right to relief by

showing excusable neglect or good cause. See United States v.
No. 04-10398

-2-

Awalt, 728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir. 1984); FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(4).

Accordingly, Lujan’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction; his motions for the appointment of counsel and a

copy of the transcript at government expense are DENIED.
Exhibit 10.12

            ADDENDUM 5 TO THE SIMON EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF 8-01-02


         The following are amendments to the David Simon Employment Agreement
with SCHIMATIC Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc. dba Smart Chip Technologies
("Company", "SCTN" or "Employer") effective 8-01-02 as amended by Addendums on
7-28-03, 5-05-2004, July 7, 2004, and November 12, 2004.

         This Addendum to the employment agreement is to be effective as of July
1, 2004.

         For the purpose of cleaning up the "financial and stock overhang" of
the Company, as dictated by the Board of Directors, the Company and Simon agreed
to certain amendments, some of which have since been determined by the Board to
be detrimental to the Company from a tax standpoint. Therefore, in the best
interest of the Company, the following has been agreed to by Simon and approved
by the Board:

         1.     Simon will return the Performance Bonus of 3,000,000 shares
                granted him as part of the settlement of July 7, 2004.

         2.     The bonus of the 12 million shares to David Simon will be
                reversed, and revert to the original Employment Agreement as
                modified by subsequent Addendums.

         3.     The elimination of the clauses for Simon allowing conversion
                of back payroll to stock will be reversed, and revert to the
                original Employment Agreement with Addendums. Item 1 in
                Addendums 4 to the Simon Employment Agreement will be
                reversed, and the salary levels agreed to will remain in
                effect until the Company's cash flow allows them to be paid at
                fair market value salaries, as approved by the Board.

         4.     The bonus to Simon to pay off his non-recourse note as
                referenced in Addendum 3 dated 7/7/2004, item 3.e, will be
                deferred until Simon requests that the bonus take effect.

         5.     All changes reversed will be treated for accounting purposes
                as if they had never occurred.

I HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, I UNDERSTAND ITS TERMS, AND AGREE TO
BE BOUND BY ALL OF ITS TERMS. I ALSO UNDERSTAND I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE THIS
AGREEMENT REVIEWED BY INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on December
18, 2004.


Employer:                                                Employee:
SCTN                                                     David Simon
330 E. Warm Springs Rd.                                  2859 E. Wasatch Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV  89119                                     Sandy, UT  84092


  By: /s/ Bernard McHale                                By:/s/ David Simon
      ------------------                                   ---------------
      Bernard McHale, Director                             David Simon
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this amendment to the annual report of TMSF Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Raymond Eshaghian
---------------------------------
Raymond Eshaghian
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
April 30, 2003


/s/  Masoud Najand
---------------------------------
Masoud Najand
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
April 30, 2003



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY THE SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
    PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED
      TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22787-SCOLA/GOODMAN

LIORA SAMANDAROVA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HOOKAH EXOTIX LLC, 

JEAN-CHRISTOPHE PITTMAN, 

AND ALEXANDRE ARKHIPOV,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment

(the “Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised. 

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55 and 58, the Court enters this separate judgment 

for Plaintiff. Accordingly, for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as 

follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment is hereby GRANTED;

2. Default Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, Liora Samandarova, and against 

Defendant, Alexandre Arkhipov, in the amount of $16,008.00, calculated as follows:

a. Unpaid/underpaid minimum wages in the amount of $3,944.00;

b. Unpaid overtime wages in the amount of $3,060.00;

c. Unpaid contractual compensation in the amount of $2,000.00; and

d. Liquidated damages in the amount of $7,004.00.

3. Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against Defendant, Alexandre Arkhipov.

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS Document 34-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
4. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover her reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in an amount to 

be determined by the Court.

5. The Court retains jurisdiction over this cause to enter such further Orders as are necessary 

and appropriate for the conclusion of this action.

DONE and ORDERED in Miami-Dade, Florida, on this _____ day of February, 2023. 

_________________________________

 ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS Document 34-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2