IN Tlv tJN ITED STATES D ISTRICT COU RT FO R TH E

SO UTH ERN D ISTRICT O FFLO RID A

W EST PALM BEACH D IW SIO N

DONALD J.TRUM P,

PlainW NO.

V .

UM TED STA TESOF AM ERICA,

Defendant

9:22-cv-81294-AM C

FILED BY D

.C.

Dated:August31,2022

sgg g12g22

Y TR'IALDE uo Cs

ALNEGREKLuAsE.DNlOs'BcLcE'n .D.oF/LA.-w.RB.

Ammeoée; MOVANT-INTERVENOR(PROSEI-IGIK.PATEL'SREPLYTO

DEFEMDANT'SRESPONSEATDU .48

1,T.E.,T.E IIAJK.PATEL,theundersigned movant-intervenorprose,in theabovenamed case,with apendingm otion atDkt.36,hereby subm ittltisreplyto DefendantUnited StatesofA m erica'sResponseatD kt.48.

W I-IEREM ,underthecurrentoperadonw theRepublichasbeendisregrdedbythe

conducwtoftheUnitedStatesDOJandF.B.I,Nixonv.Gen.5tv'p.Admin.,433U.S.425,M 7-

9(1977)9and,

W HFIZEAS,thePresidencyconsistsoftheincllmbentandform erPresident;and,

W HEREAS,theUnited StatesOrderofPrecedent,housedbytheOfficeoftheCltief

ofProtocolofUnitedStatesSecretaryofState,show susthatformer-presidentTrump is

precedentto the operations ofthe incumbent-Attom ey GeneraloftheUnited States,

https:/k- .state.gov/N -content/uploads/zozo/os/zozo-order-of-precedenceFINAL.pdfat2(revised5/14/20)and1d.at1(''-..tbiqdoclmentestablishesageneral

oxderforthecountry'shighest-levelposidons...-);and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 1 of 10
W HEREAG,the Consdtudon's1aw and policy iswelldocllmented in theUnited

StatesOrderofPrecedentbecauseinclzmbentandform erPresidentsareexpeGedtohave

aninformationadvantage,M cM ahonv.PresidentialAiramys,502F.3d1331,1351(11thCir.

2007)(quotingBakerv.Clrr,369U.S.186,217(U.S.1962)),Sweenq v.Tucker,375A.2d698,

473Pa.493,509(Pa.1977)tthePresidencyspecificalyhas''autonomousdeterminadonof

theissueraised-l;Comm.ontheludidary,U..S.HouseofRpresentativesv.Miers,558F.Supp.

2d53,103(D.D.C.2008)(Bates,J.)(explainingthattheExecutivebranch'sseparadon-ofpowersinterestin ''Iplresidendalautonomy);44U.S.C.jj2204(b)(1)(A)(i)& (b)(1)(B);

andProf.ComeliusAdrianComstockVermettlel'W drianVermeulev),VeilofIgnorance

Rules Constitutional Law, 111 Yale L.J. 399, 403-07, 411-14, 399-433 (2001),

https://doi.org/10.2307/797593;and,

W HEREAS, enkance into the form er President's castle by the incllm bent

govem mentissupposed tobe asignificantand distinguishablem ove and onethatis

readily available,assuch gestures,ourFram ersand Foundersverywellknew,aretoset

them selvesapartf'rom acoupdefqf.

TITEREFORE,any form er president can daim Privilege againstthe incllmbent

governm entand law enforcem ent,exceptforwhen theincllmbentPresidentisdirectly

involved with spee cally authorized law enforcem entenddes such msUnited States

SecretService agentsorUnited StatesM ilitary soldiers,confm .Endelq r.United States

D@'fofDefense,268F.Supp.3d166,176(D.D.C.2017)(internaldtadonsomitted).

W HEREAS,thevesdgesofthe Constitulion and thePresidendalRecordsAct,44

U.S.C.jj2201etseq',makestltismatterforthePresidencyalong;and,

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 2 of 10
W HE/EAS,neithertheintuzm bentnorform erlaresidentlowntherecords,44U.S.C.

52202;and,

W lxbamAs,onlytheUnitedStatesownsthePresidentialrecords,Id.;and,

THEREFORE,Governmentcanhavenointerestsuperiortothoseoftheincumbent

orform erHeadsofState,both corustitudonal(Iistind enddeswhich areheaded by the

incllmbentPresident.Butcf.Dkt.48at24dtingUnitedStatesv.Nixon,418U.S.683,708

(1974).

W HEREAG,thePolidcalQuesdonDoce eandthePTesidendalRecordsAG m akes

informadonmanagementanaffaiTspec#calyofthePresidencyratherth= thelarger

execudvebranch,seee.g.,Holcombv.Bray,187N.E.3d1268,1290tInd.2022)t'''lhepolidcal

quesdon docfrine prevents cottrts 9om getfing hw olved in the intem alm atters of

Ianother)branclu''l(internaldtadonsomitted),Jiménezv.Palacios,250A.3d814,828,830,

837(De1.Ch.2019)(intem alaffairsdocM ne),Ga.ptv erCo.v.AliedClwmicalCorp.,233

Ga.558,563(Ga.1975)(intem aldtadon omitled),Grimaudv.Com,581Pa.398,418(Pa.

2005),andWilliamPennSch.Dist.v.Pa.Dl'fofEduc,No.J-82-2016*39(Pa.Sep.28,2017)

(''self-monitoring'')(intem aldtadonsomitted);and,

W HEREAG,onlythePresidentandtheendrejudidaryaretheonlyinslnlmentsof

theUnitedStatesConstituliorksnotsubjedtoveilrulesizand,

W HEREAS,other Execudve personnelirtferior to the Presidencp c.f inclmbent

President,andtheCongressaresubjecttoinformadonveilrules,Prof.Com eliusAdrian

1.FormerPresidentscanpossesspropeo andrights,whichareownedbytheUnitedStates,onbehalfof

theUnitedStates.SealsoTuckerAc't,28U.S.C.j51346(a)& 1491(formerPTesidentTnzmphasadual

authoritymsformerpresidentoftheUnitedStatesfornecessarymatersoftheipsofactoofhceofthe

formerPresidentoftheUnitedStates),42U.S.C.jj1981-2,andFederalistNos.78&80.TheExcellent

dtleholderswhom'enaturalbom dtizensownfheUnitedStates.

2.ShouldIhavenotmyomnipresenttitlesandstylesfrom elededexcellentofsce(theonlykindinthe

cotmtryindomesdcaffairs,asfarasIknow),mypolidcalsdencedegreefrom atop-derlAniversity

allow sbetoovercom etheveilruleviatheUnited StatesCortstitutionalPrivilegebestowed uponm e

bythesamedauseofinterestfoTthePresident.U.S.const.art.lV,j2.Se Dkt.21.

3

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 3 of 10
ComstockVermeulel'W drianVermetlevl,VeiloflpmrlAlc:RulesinConsffzffïonl!Law,

111YaleL.J.399,403-07,411-14,399-433(2001),https:/pdoi.org/10.2307/797593;and,

W HFREAS,in otherwords,only the incumbentPresidentwillknow ifallother

officersand persozm eloftheexecudvebranch are ading with evidenceorupon legal

ignorance;and,

W HEREAS,ottrFotmders,uponsm dyallpriordvilizadon,knew thatonlyaform er

HeadofStateisthenextwellposidonedtoknow ;thisconceptm ayevenrem ain trueifa

VicePresidentoftheUnitedStates,espedallywho,duringtheFoundingEra,w erevery

likelytobe9om differentpolidcalparfies,isAcdngPresidentforashortperiod oflime.

THEREFORE,in order keep the Republic indivisible and standinp a former

President,here,PresidentTnlmp,canassertPrivilege.U.S.const.art.IV j2.

W HIumAS,underthecurrentm ethod adm inistered theUnited StatesDepartment

ofJusdce,form erPresidentTrum p isheld accountableto thesam estandard ofanotUnitedStatesdtizenindividual-hum an-personelectedtolocaloffice,whom aybedenied

Privilegeoftheelectedoffice(legisladve,execudve,magiskate,andjudidal)byeitherthe

charteringSisterStateortheUrtitedStates,U.S.const.art.1V,j2& amend.XlV,j1,c1.2;

and,

W HEREAS,thus,theAttom eyGeneralhascomm itledTreasonl,and;

W HEREAS,PresidentTnlmp hasbeen denied substandve Due Processand his

honor'sPrivilegesasashield,ratherth> asw ord,contra.Dkt.48at26andseeU.S.const.

art.1V,j2& amend.M V,j1,cl.29and,

W HEREAS,O urFram ers,whowereafraid ofcolonizadon,both by foreign values

and force,of'b1'qNew Union by O1d W orld powers,have certainly instilled a logical

distinctionbetweentheform erH eadsofStateoftheUnitedStatesandnot-dtizeztsofthe

UnitedStates,seeU.S.const.axtW ,jlreferringtotheTreatyofParis(1783$Id.referring

4

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 4 of 10
toGrievances20& 21,Ded.ofIndep.(1776),andLinv.UnitedStates,561F.3d502,509

(D.C.Cir.2009).3

THEREFORE,the Defendant-united Statescannotdeny Plnintiff-'lhe Honorable

Trlmp his''endtled''privilegesand immllnities asa citizen oftheUnited Statesa4

Federalist80.

W IIEREAS,ratherth= theinmzmbentAttom ey General,itisdearthatincllmbent

PresidentBiden should haveadedbecausetheAttom eyGeneralGarland,executinghis

owntm checkedwarrant,enteredthecastleofaform erHeadofStateoftheUnitedStates,

here,whoisformerPresidentTrump sccc.g.44U.S.C.j2209(c)(1);and,

W HITREAG,tmdertheConstitudonalrealitp PresidentTrump'scastle,even during

itsweakeststate,can w ithstand theendre Govem m entofthe United Stateswith its

impenetrableshieldsupportedbyHisHonor'sstatus,precedent,Privileges,Im m llnities,

substandveDueProcessrights,and/ortheFottrthAmendmentsearchandseiztre;and,

W HEREAS,am ongstthelaw enforcementautltorides,onlytheUnited StatesSecret

Service and theUrtited StatesM ilitam tm derthe directcom m and ofthe inclzm bent

United StatesPresident,can ''execute''a warrantin a prem iseswhich are otherwise

protectedbyan''impenetrable(force)shieldz''18U.S.C.jj3056(c)(1)(A)& (D)& Dkt.36

at2-3.

'lm - oltE,theDefendant-unitedStatesenkanceintoPlaintiff-Tnlmp'spremises

w ereinvalid.

W HFREAG,thePresidendalRecordsActm akethePresidenfalrecordstheproperty

oftheUnitedStates,44U.S.C.52022and42.U.S.C.jj1981-29and,

3.KingEdw ard= 1,fonnerHead ofStateoftheUnited Kingdom ofGreatBritainandhusbandofW alis

Simpson,theQueen'stmde,andHerMajestyQueenElizabeth11areonlyoneexample.

4.Congress,aswhole,hasthepowertoremovedtizemsltip.

5

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 5 of 10
W HEREAS,thus, the Presidendal records can be mutually possessed by the

incumbentandformerPresident,U.S.const.art.lV,52and42U.S.C.% 1981-2;and,

W HEREAS,Plaintiff-Tnlm p has notbeen accused of converting United States

propertyof44U.S.C.j2022whichPlaintiffwasinpossession.

THEREFORE,tlze Defendant-united States cmm otdeny Plaindff-The H onorable

Trum phisPrivilegesbecauseheisalawfulprocessorofUnitedStatesdocllm ents.

W I.Tb'JmAS,ifCongresshmsthepow ertoenactthePresidendalRecordsAct,then it

withoutForcellnlessitisspedficallyapprovedbyincum bentPresident,U.S.const.art.1,

j1andZivotofskyv.Clinton,132S.Ct.1421,1441(U.S.2012)9and,

W HEREAS,Defendant-unitedStatesofAm ericahassaidthatinmlmbentPresident

Bidenw asnotinvolvedintheraidatthecharteredM ar-a-Lago.

THElte oltE,thePresidendalRecordsActwaswithoutcorusdtudonalforceandhas

onlybeenusedtodisturbtheRepublic.

W HEREAG,itisalsofairtosaythatPrivilegecanbeassertedagainstahypothedcal

Congressionalspecialprosecutor,who acting upon ignorance,can changethepolitical

agendaoftheUnitedStates,apowervestedintheincumbentleadersbip ofPresidentof

theUnited States,seeDkt.48at24dtingTrumpv.Thompson,142S.Ct.680,680(2022/

and,

W HEREAS,the Consdtudonalprindples m ake it dear thatrao cadon by the

incumbentPresidentisnotpermitted,which isalsoforthebestinterestoftheRepublic

and largerStateoftheUnited States;and,

W HEREAS,thepoliticalbranchesareheldaccotmtablebythepolidcsand cottrders

ofW asbinglon,D.C.;and,

6

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 6 of 10
W T-IEREAS,thus,thepolidcalactorsofthepolidcalbranchesarenottobeshielded

by''neukal''executiveactorswhoansw eronlytoCongressionaloversightafteraperson

receivesstandingtosue,Dkt.48at26-299and,

W HEREAS,theAm erican normsofpeacefulkansition ofpowerhelpspolitkally

enforcethePresidendalRecordsAct,Dep'tofCommercev.Montana,503U.S.442,448

(1992:and,

W HFRNAG,the lawswhic.h been overlooked are the Privilegesand Imm llnities

Clauseasapplied to the form erPresidentoftheUnited States,the castle docfrine as

applied to former Presidentofthe United States,the PolidcalQuesdon Doctrine

(requiringthedirectlymssignedForces,underthecommonlaw,theCorusdtudon,orAds

ofCongress,totheincl4mbentand form erPresidentstohelp dedderatherth= ofthe

UnitedStatesDepnementofJustice),theauthorizingstatuteoftheUnitedStatesSecret

Service,andthePresidendalRecordsAct,IapanW/lflingAss'np.Am.CetaceanSocry,478

U.S.221,230(1986)CtheconfinesoftheExecudveBranch/'theOvalOfficeandthose

haveformerlysatthere);and,

W I.mRF,AS,the case-at-hand hasuniquely showed thatthe powersofjudicial

review willallow thisCourttodeterminewhetherornotan applicadon ofthePolidcal

Question Docfrine hasbeen properly followed,which isalso severably answ ered by

whetherthe applicable Privileges to the Plaino were followed orcmstle docfvine as

appliedtothePlaintiffwasfollowed,i.e.didtheproperconfinesoftheExecudveBranch

(i.e.thePresidency)folow protocol,see1d.,Zemprelliv.Daniels,496Pa.247,255(Pa.1981),

TransWorldAirlines,Inc.v.FrflrlkliaM intC/rp.,466U.S.243,254(1984),Nixonv.United

States,506U.S.224,240(1993$and Carmichaelv.Kelogg,572F.3d 1271,1287(11th Cir.

2009/and,

7

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 7 of 10
W HEREAS,theamendersoftheUnitedStatesConsdtudonhavealso showed that

theform erPresident,whom ustbeanatural-bom dtizen tm derthegoverningoriginal

intent,isnotaplttralized dtlebeneath theUnited StatesNadonalGovernm entorthe

SisterStatetobother,U.S.const.nmend.XIV,j2,d.1;and,

W HEREAG,Iusem yConsdtudonalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknowingfrom

my tmdergraduate and 1aw school,jttrisdoctorcandidacp educadoxtsand polidcal

ofhcesandfrom reading1aw outsideofformalschoolingforthewridnganddiscussiorus,

arguments,andmodonsofthesefilings,seeDkt.21at5& 20andsupra,p.9(signature

linel.

TY ltEyon thecourtshould appointaspedalm asterand allow intervendon,and

in furtheranceoftheintervention andFed.R.Civ.P.24,theCottrtorderdisdosetom ez

themovant-intervenor,aldocumentstoadequately andwithoutprejudicerepresent

intervendon andthecom m on quesdonsof1aw orfactandm yaforesaidinterestsin tltis

transadion,asdescribed in Dkt.21& 36,asthisCou/ hasinherentautlxority tohelp

maintaintherelatiortsofmylegitimateexcelency(excellendes,here)from andonlyfrom

electedofficeandensurethattheDevolved Sovereignty totheUnited Statesischecked.

SeealsoDkt.49.

FURTHER,1also m ove orproposeto thisCourt- my appoinM entto spedal

m asterwillallow tltisCom tand theDefendantto ensm ethatthe Execudve Branch,

tm derthellnitary executivetheorp isconductingreview ofthenecessarydoclzm entsthatIbeappointed asaspedalm aster.Contra.Elrodv.Sunzs, e 7U.S.347,353(1976).

SeealsoM cMahonv.PresidentialAirways,502F.3d1331,1356n.22(111 Cir.2007).

SeealsoD kt.36.

''(A)prose(modon),howeverinartfulypleaded,mustbeheldtolessstringentstandards

th= form alpleadingsdraftedbylawyers.''Ericlœonv.Pardus,551U .S.89,94(2007).

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 8 of 10
9

Res y subm itted,

/s/RajK.P te

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(prosej

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion Cotm ty

317-450-6651(cel1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

J.D.Candidate,NokeDameL.Sch.2015-2017

President/studentBodyPresident,StudentGov'tAss'nof

EmoryU.,lnc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

StudentBodyPresident,Browrksbm gCm ty.Sch.

Corp./president,BrowrtsbtrgHighSch.StudentGov't

2009-2010(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.from theNotreDam eL.Sch.StudentB.Ass'ntothe

lnd.St.B.A ss'n 2017

DeputyRegionalDirector,YoungDem ocatsofAm .-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Fotm der& ViceChair,lnd.l-Iigh Sch.Dem ocrats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.tlndep.l,OxfordC.Republicansof

Em ory U .,lnc.2011-2012

9

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 9 of 10
#

CERTW ICATE O F SERW CE

Icel.tifythat1servedacoqyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)ReplytoDkt.48on

08/31/2022tobelow indiwdualsviathee-mail:

JamesM .Trusty

IFRAH ,PLLC

1717PennqylvaniaAve,N W ,Stlite650

W ashington,DC 20006

202-852-5669

jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

Lindsey H alllgan

511SE 51 Avenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

720-435-2870

lindseyhalligan@outlookocom

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverm an,Thompson,Slutkin,& W hite,

LLC

400EastPratlSkeet,Suite900

Ballim ore,M D 21230

410-385-7775

CC0rCOrM @Si1Ve= O Z Om PSOn.C0m

JuanAntonioGonzalez

UN ITED STATESAU ORN EY

99N E41 Skeet,81 Floor

M iam i,F133132

Telephone:(305)961-9001

jur .antoGo.gor alez@>doj.gov

Jay1.Bratt,Chief

Counterintelligence& Expol'tControl

SecdonN at'lSeclzrityDiv.

950PennqylvaniaA venue,N W

W ashington,D .C.20530

(202)233-0986

jay.brattzA sdoj.gov

D ated:August31,2022

Respecfhllly su 't1d,

ps/RajPatel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(ProSej

6850East21stSkeet

lndianapolis,IN 46219

M arion County

317-450-6651(ce11)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

10

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 10 of 10