T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E O N B U L L O C K S , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C I T Y O F L AS VE GA S DE T E NT I ON C E N T E R and K A R E N C O Y N E , C hi ef D i r e c t or , C i tyof

L a s V e ga s D e t e nt i on C ent er , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16609 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 5 4 2 - R L HG WF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R oge rL . H unt , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , W . F L E T C H E R , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e on B ul l oc ks , J r . , af

orm e rde t a i ne e a tthe C i tyof L a s V e ga s D e t e nt i on Ce n t e r , ap p e a l s p r o s e f r o m th e d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s s u mma ryj u d g me n ti n h i s 4 2 U . S. C. 

# FI LED OC T 13 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16609 2 § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g th a t h e s u f f e r e dh e a lth p r o b le m s f

r o m p o o rv e n tila tio n in h is uni t . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo the d e c is io n to g r a n t s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) , a n d m a ya f

f irm o n a n yg r o u n ds u p p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . John son v. R i versi de H

ea l th ca re S

ys. , 5 3 4 F .3 d1 1 1 6 , 1 1 2 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e a f f irm . S um m ary j ud gm enton B ul l ocks’ s del i bera t e i nd i ff er ence cl ai m w as prop er b e c au s e h e f

a ile d to r a is e atr iab le d is p u te a s to w h e th e rd e f e n d a n ts c o n s c io u s ly di sr egar ded an excess i ve ri sk t o h i s hea l th w here the evi dence s ho w ed thatthey re spon ded t o h i s c om pl ai nt s, pres cr i bed h i m m edi ci ne, and g rant ed hi s r equestfor a tr a n s f e rto an e w u n it. Se e T

oguc hi , 391 F . 3d a t1057 ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d f

or E i gh th A m endm entdel i bera t e i nd i ff er ence cl ai m ); Ca rn e ll , 74 F . 3d a t979 ( not i ng th a t p r e tr ia l d e ta in e e ’s F o u rte e n th A m e n d m e n t d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e c la im is a n a ly z e d u n d e rth e s a m e s ta n d a r d a s s u c h ac la im u n d e rth e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng B ul l oc ks ’ s m ot i ons t o com pel di sc ov ery bec ause he fa i l ed t o serve any proper or t i m el y di sc ov ery r e q u e s ts . See D r ape rv . C oom bs , 792 F . 2d 915, 924 ( 9th C i r . 1986) . T o the e xt e nt thatB ul l ocks soug hta c on t i nu ance of the sum m ary j ud gm entm ot i on t o con du ct d i sco v ery an d am en d h i s o p p o si t i o n , th e req u estw as p ro p erl y d en i ed b ecau se B ul l ocks fa i l ed t o sho w thathe “ di l i gent l y pursued” pri or di sc ov ery opp ortun i t i es10- 16609 3 or thatal l ow i ng addi t i on al di sc ov ery w ou l d “ prec l ud e[ ] sum m ary j ud gm ent . ” Q ual l s v . B lue Cr os s of

Cal. , I nc . , 22 F . 3d 83 9, 84 4 (9th C i r. 19 94 ). A FFI R M ED .