alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-30.htm


Exhibit 10.30


 

























	
Triple R America Co. Ltd.

	
March 16th. 2011









2700 Dufferin St.


Unit 86


Toronto ON M6B 4J3












Re: Eco-Tek Group Inc distribution exclusivity












This letter is to confirm that Triple R America Co. Ltd gives Eco-Tek Group Inc the exclusive distributor rights for the transport and automotive industry in North America for Eco-Tek branded Bypass Oil Cleaner housings and the filter elements for the housings supplied by Triple R America and the right of first refusal of distribution of related Eco-Tek future products that may be supplied by Triple R America Co. Ltd.  












Signed:


David Murray


President

















Triple R America Co. Ltd.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

At December 31, 2001, the Company had five directly wholly owned subsidiaries:

     Morton Metalcraft Co., an Illinois corporation
     Morton Metalcraft Co., of North Carolina, a North Carolina corporation
     B & W Metal Fabricators, Inc., a North Carolina corporation
     Mid-Central Plastics, Inc., an Iowa corporation
     Morton Metalcraft Co. of South Carolina, a South Carolina corporation

At December 31, 2001, the Company owned 49% of Morton Holdings, LLC. Morton
Holdings, LLC owns 100% of Morton Custom Plastics, LLC. Morton Custom Plastics,
LLC holds the assets acquired in 1999 from Worthington Custom Plastics, Inc.
Quilvest Custom Plastics, Inc., an affiliate of shareholders of Morton
Industrial Group, Inc. owns 51% of Morton Holdings, LLC. Morton Industrial
Group, Inc., acts as the manager of Morton Holdings, LLC and is allocated 100%
of each item of Morton Holdings, LLC's income, gains, losses, deductions and
credits. Quilvest Custom Plastics, Inc. has granted Morton Industrial Group,
Inc., an irrevocable option to purchase its interest in Morton Holdings, LLC at
any time for the sum of One Thousand Dollars.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Albert Morris v. Wells Fargo Bank

Appellate case number: 01-19-00610-CV

Trial court case number: 15-DCV-221475

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

This appeal was dismissed on September 26, 2019 for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal filed by appellant, Albert Morris, was untimely. On October 11, 2019, Morris 

filed a motion for an extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. The Court granted the motion 

and extended the deadline to November 25, 2019. Morris filed his motion for rehearing on 

November 25, 2019 and the Court subsequently denied the motion on January 9, 2020.

On January 24, 2020, Morris filed a motion requesting a 45-day extension of time to file a 

motion for en banc reconsideration. The Court granted the motion and extended the deadline to 

March 13, 2020. On March 6, 2020, Morris filed another extension motion requesting an additional 

45-day extension. The Court granted the motion and extended the deadline to May 12, 2020. On 

May 8, 2020, Morris filed yet another extension motion, this time requesting an additional 120-

day extension. The Court denied the additional extension on June 10, 2020. Morris subsequently 

filed a motion for rehearing regarding the denial of his motion for an additional extension of time 

to file a motion for en banc reconsideration. The Court denied the motion for rehearing on October 

13, 2020. 

On October 28, 2020, Morris filed a motion for en banc reconsideration regarding the 

denial of his motion for an additional extension of time to file a motion for en banc reconsideration. 

The En Banc Court has voted to deny the motion for en banc reconsideration filed by Morris. 

Accordingly, it is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied. 

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Sarah B. Landau___________ 

 Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: ___December 3, 2020_____
Order entered December 20, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00883-CV

DAVID GARVIN, JR., Appellant

V.

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-06754

ORDER

On November 23, 2022, we ordered Terri Etekochay, the Official Court 

Reporter for the 101st Judicial District Court, to file, no later than December 8, 

2022, either the reporter’s record of the proceedings held “on or about” July 6, 

2022 and August 10, 2022 or written verification no record exists. To date, Ms. 

Etekochay has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Etekochay to file the 

record or requested verification no later than January 4, 2023.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable Staci Williams, Presiding Judge of the 101st Judicial District Court; Ms. 

Etekochay; and, the parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
GOPHER RESOURCES AMBIENT MONITORING

Lead Concentration in μg/m3

Sample Recovery Date GRS-1 GRS-2

7/6/2009 0.278 0.02

7/12/2009 0.054 0.061

7/18/2009 0.1 0.006

7/24/2009 0.248 0.038

7/30/2009 0.686 0.014

8/5/2009 0.219 0.014

8/11/2009 0.15 0.012

8/17/2009 0.358 0.042

8/23/2009 0.011 0.075

8/29/2009 0.012 0.022

9/2/2009 0.021 0.191 Special three day collection, not i

9/4/2009 0.026 0.221

9/7/2009 0.019 0.538 Special three day collection, not i

9/10/2009 0.021 0.147

9/13/2009 0.041 0.143 Special three day collection, not i

9/16/2009 0.021 0.081

9/19/2009 0.015 0.104 Special three day collection, not i

Average 0.168 0.058

10/4/2009 0.128 0.013

10/10/2009 0.244 0.015

10/16/2009 0.054 0.02

10/22/2009 0.021 0.011

10/28/2009 0.013 0.009

11/3/2009 0.086 0.06

11/9/2009 0.301 0.247

11/15/2009 0.116 0.048

11/21/2009 0.02 0.145

11/27/2009 0.02 0.133

Average 0.1 0.07

1/2/2010 0.023 0.009

1/8/2010 0.099 0.013

1/14/2010 0.03 0.044

1/20/2010 0.028 0.033

1/26/2010 0.123 0.012

Average 0.06 0.023

Transcribed from reports submitted by Gopher Resources. Done by a private lab, MPCA 

does not know QA/QC procedures. Non Regulatory - for information only.
Special three day collection, not included in average

Special three day collection, not included in average

Special three day collection, not included in average

Special three day collection, not included in average
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.721 Safety Zone: St. Johns River, Jacksonville, FL. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is established as a safety zone during the specified conditions: The waters within a 500 yard radius of the fireworks barge or barges during the storage, preparation, and launching of fireworks in the St. Johns River between the Hart and Acosta Bridges.
( b ) *Effective dates.* This section becomes effective upon activation by the Captain of the Port by the broadcasting of a local Notice to Mariners on appropriate VHF-FM radio frequencies. It terminates at the conclusion of the fireworks display unless terminated earlier by the Captain of the Port.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in 165.23 of this part, anchoring, mooring or transiting in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or District Commander.
( 2 ) This regulation does not apply to authorized law enforcement agencies operating within the Safety Zone.
[COTP Jacksonville Reg. 94-027, 59 FR 55584, Nov. 8, 1994]
# A-5A-B Comp Ver-Disp
ex71.htm






  





  











  













 



Exhibit 10.71




 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$400,000                                                                           Date:  April 23, 2012


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($400,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















___/s/ Melvin Gagerman_________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: April 23, 2012
R12W R11W R10W ROW R8wW
'
t |
27 ' T
s | 27
A Ss
5
R15W |
T Fork oe |
28 |
S | t
28
Ss
- OREGON
+
29 oz
Ss 3 2 T
ote 29
x Ss
213
gfe
QEn
Buz
ia} fe ‘
W- E
DS SSS ee
|
1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
R16W | — 1 I I [ E I E T ]
RO + Miles
-—COOS COUNTY ___ Fork | 30 1,0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CURRY COUNTY Pts) ee
815 S Kilometers
fe}
as
Slo
lg
31S Albers Equal Area Projection
=|5 North American Datum of 1983
| ROSEBURG
1 DISTRICT
A\ \ Powers ote
1 T
| 31
i Ss
1 LZ g8fos 1 Cy,
| ve moles (| le,
c 1 BdzS
| OPfox '
_- isk (ake | modifed for Wester Oregon Plan Revisons analysis:
| men creases staan
Ce Rive, | eta for individual or aggregate use wih eter Seta
1
-~. ENT OF 5p US. DEPARTHENT OFTHE INTERIOR
| / J NO . & Wy <2 _
—~, . e:) \ —~ 4
| -J \-TFg 32 $ iy y
| = Kl °
Garrison ' ) Sis “anes 3 ee
Lake Port | / 3219
' J me i
| aa |
_. , . 4
| (
| (
1 Sue T
| 33
' Ss
|
LL [ GLENDALE
iT Sie RESOURCE
SYS AREA
8 ae
R16W ; GRANT Re
/ PASS
’ RESOURC!
rT AREA|
+ T
34
y Ss
2
!
R11W R 10’? W R10W ROW R8W
x
2
N
T v T
35 35
Ss Ss
Rogue
Legend
T T
36 36
Ss Ss
182 Land Tenure Zone 3 Identifier Visual Resource Management Area
See Appendix F
wi Gold Beach | Class 3
Land Tenure Zone 3 Location
Class 4
T T
37 37
Ss Ss
u
a
c
+
a7
Ss
+
38
Ss
+
38
Ss
wget
é
MAP 3B
+ oe
os 184g Coos Bay District
S J
Resource Management Plan
+
39 2008
Ss
Myrtlewood Resource Area
Land Tenure Zone 3 Locations
Co
: and
40
S .
é I Visual Resource Management Classes
s s
C

R14W R13W R12W M08-09-04
**Exhibit10.2**

**SeniorHousing Properties Trust**

**400Centre StreetNewton, MA 02458**

March 13, 2006

Five Star Quality CareTrust 400Centre Street

Newton, MA 02458

Attention: Bruce J.Mackey

Re:                               SecondAmended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as of November 19, 2004 (as amended,the “Lease”)

Dear Bruce:

The purpose ofthis letter is to confirm that, pursuant to Section 4.1.1(b) of the Lease,Valley View was sold on December 31, 2005. The net proceeds of the salereceived were $2,676,448.00. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2006, MinimumRent payable under the Lease shall be reduced by $267,644.80 per annum.
|                         |                    | Very truly yours,   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
|                         |                    |                |
|                         |                    | /s/ John R. Hoadley |   |
|                         |                    | John R. Hoadley     |
| Acknowledged and Agreed:     |                    |                |
|                         |                    |                |
| Five Star Quality Care Trust |
| By:                          | /s/ Bruce J. Mackey Jr. |                |
|                         | Bruce J. Mackey, Jr.    |
|                         | Treasurer               |
|                              |                         |                     |  |  |  |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21337]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 204 and 252

RIN 0750-AG47
[DFARS Case 2011-D039]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Safeguarding 
Unclassified DoD Information

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add a new subpart and associated 
contract clauses to address requirements for safeguarding unclassified 
DoD information. The comment period is being extended 93 days to 
provide additional time for interested parties to review the proposed 
DFARS changes.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to 
one of the addresses shown below on or before November 30, 2011, to be 
considered in the formation of the final rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2011-D039, using 
any of the following methods:
    [cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: 
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments.
    [cir] E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e58183849796a58a9681cb888c89"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7b3b1b6a5a497b8a4b3f9babebb">[email protected]</span></a>. Include DFARS Case 2011-D039 in the 
subject line of the message.
    [cir] Fax: 703-602-0350.
    [cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr. 
Julian Thrash, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
    Comments received generally will be posted without change to 
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    To confirm receipt of your comment, please check 
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days 
after submission to verify posting (except allow 93 days for posting of 
comments submitted by mail).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Julian Thrash, telephone 703-602-
0310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on June 29, 
2011 (76 FR 38089), with a request for comments by August 29, 2011. DoD 
is extending the comment period for 93 days to provide additional time 
for interested parties to review the proposed DFARS changes.

Mary Overstreet,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2011-21337 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 158.180 Certificate of Adequacy: Procedures after revocation or the part no longer applies. ( a ) If a Certificate of Adequacy is revoked, the person in charge shall return it to the COTP within five days after the revocation becomes effective.
( b ) When this part no longer applies to the port or terminal, the person in charge shall return the Certificate of Adequacy to the COTP within 30 days after this part no longer applies.
( c ) After the Certificate of Adequacy has been returned to the COTP under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, an application for a new Certificate of Adequacy may be submitted under § 158.140.
Senior Nutrition Program

Prioritizing Participants

Why prioritize?

More than ever, it is the RIGHT time to prioritize.

• Reach. Expand program reach to seniors with unmet needs.

• Innovate. Plan for unexpected changes in food or funding.

• Grow. Respond to the growing number of older Americans.

• Help. Serve people with greatest need for nutrition services.

• Target. Give multi-level outcome data to stakeholders/decisionmakers.

Prioritization System

• Consider creating a workgroup to lead implementation and training.

• If possible, use an existing prioritization model and tool.

• Statewide or otherwise unified policies and tools are ideal.

• Ensure the prioritization system includes a monitoring plan.

• A user-friendly, fair, and reliable screening tool is essential to prioritizing.

Screening Tips

• Screening is different and simpler than assessment.

• Focus on eligibility and tailor screening criteria to serve the most at-risk seniors.

• Criteria are program-specific but may include factors such as:

• ADLs/IADLs

• Malnutrition

• Food security

• Chronic health conditions

• Transportation access

• Existing supports/services

• Mock screening exercises can help to identify potential problems.

Waitlist Considerations

• Assign a waitlist manager and select/develop a tracking tool.

• Decide on waitlist criteria for additions and removals.

• Develop a list of other resources for clients on the waitlist.

• Make a communication schedule for people who are waiting.

• Train staff on the waitlist processes.

• Consider how to use data beyond the waitlist’s primary purpose.

• Evaluate the waitlist process and make improvements.

Recommended Resources 

• Detailed How-To: Senior Nutrition Program’s Guide to Prioritizing Clients

• Sample Food Security Screener: UMD Prioritization Tool

• Referral Chart: Federal Nutrition Programs and Emergency Food

• Further Resources: seniornutrition.acl.gov

Next Steps

Develop a top-line 

prioritization plan 

description.

Pitch the value 

and approach to 

decisionmakers.

Get consensus and 

commit to prioritizing.

Inform and involve 

stakeholders, including 

partners.

Assign a Prioritization 

Manager and, if 

applicable, establish a 

workgroup.

Develop/customize a 

detailed prioritization 

plan and tools.

Verify the plan meets 

all relevant program 

requirements/

regulations.

Conduct training to 

ensure parties involved 

in implementation 

understand the plan.

Initiate implementation 

of the prioritization 

plan.

The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services. ACL administers the National Senior Nutrition Program, which is funded by the Older Americans Act. ACL.gov
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Southern District of Florida DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 22-81294-CIV-CANNON Proposed Intervenor The Palm Beach Post 08/31/2022 /s/ Martin Reeder L. Martin Reeder, Jr., Florida Bar No. 308684

Atherton Galardi Mullen & Reeder PLLC

1641 Worthington Road, Suite 100

West Palm Beach, FL 33409

martin@athertonlg.com (561) 293-2530 (561) 293-2593

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 1 of 1
tsla-ex107_430.htm



Certain identified information has been omitted from this document because it is not material and would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed, and has been marked with “[***]” to indicate where omissions have been made.




Exhibit 10.7

Lease Amendment

This Lease Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of July 1, 2019 by and between Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) and Panasonic Corporation of North America, for and on behalf of its division Panasonic Energy of North America (“PENA”) with respect to the Amended and Restated Factory Lease dated January 1, 2017 (the “Factory Lease”).  Terms used herein with initial capitalization have the meanings specified where used or in the Gigafactory Contract.  For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


	
1.
	
PENA shall continue to pay for its usage of electricity, RO Water, and Waste Water at the rates set forth in the first table of Appendix C: Utility Rates to the Factory Lease (the “Appendix C-1 Table”).





	
2.
	
Without limiting Section 1 above, for the period of [***] through [***], PENA shall pay a fixed sum of [***] as follows for (i) the difference in rates for electricity, RO Water, and Waste Water from the Appendix C-1 Table and the second table of Appendix C: Utility Rates to the Factory Lease (the “Appendix C-2 Table”), and (ii) PENA’s reasonable usage of the other utilities in the Appendix C-2 Table, with reference to standard production usages and the then-current approved build plan: 





	
 
	
a.
	
[***] no later than [***] for the period ending [***]; 





	
 
	
b.
	
[***] no later than [***] for the quarter ending [***]; and 





	
 
	
c.
	
[***] no later than [***] for the quarter ending [***].





	
3.
	
 As of [***], the terms of the Factory Lease (Appendix C) shall control with respect to payment of utilities.





	
4.
	
This Amendment, together with the Factory Lease and all documents referenced or incorporated therein, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both oral and written, between the Parties with respect to its subject matter.  No subsequent terms, conditions, understandings, or agreements purporting to modify the terms of this Amendment will be binding unless in writing and signed by both Parties. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered will be deemed an original, and all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment by persons duly authorized below:


			
	
Tesla, Inc. 
	
 
	
Panasonic Corporation of North America, for and on behalf of its division Panasonic Energy of North America

	
By: /s/ Jerome Guillen

Printed: Jerome Guillen

Title:President, Automotive

Date:9/20/2019
	
 
	
By: /s/ Michael Riccio

Printed: Michael G. Riccio

Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: 9/17/2019




 

 

 

Lease AmendmentPage 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2570-000]


Blandin Paper Company; Notice of Cancellation

June 2, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Blandin Paper Company (Blandin) 
filed a Notice of Cancellation of Blandin Rate Schedule No. 1.
    Any person desiring to protest such filing should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or 
before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to 
determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14402 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M