alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of secured Financial Network, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Jeffrey L. Schultz, in my capacity as Principal Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April
              17, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Jeffrey
              L. SchultzJeffrey
              L. SchultzTitlePrincipal
              Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130620-1 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. JOSEFINA RODRIGUEZ, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 130620 COA: 262443 Van Buren CC: 01-048134-CK FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant-Appellant,

and

SAFECO INSURANCE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

SAFECO INSURANCE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130621 COA: 262444 Van Buren CC: 01-048128-CK JOSEFINA RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee,

and

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ Third-Party-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
# Uradni list C 418/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 418 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6211. december 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 418

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6211. december 2019

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Objave |
| | UPRAVNI POSTOPKI |
| | Evropski parlament |
| 2019/C 418/01 | Sklep | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

V   Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Evropski parlament

2019/C 418/01

Sklep

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

V Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Evropski parlament

| 11.12.2019 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 418/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2019

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 418/1

---

SKLEP

(2019/C 418/01)

GENERALNI SEKRETAR EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA –

| — | OB UPOŠTEVANJU Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 (1), kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 1023/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2013 o spremembi Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske unije in Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropske unije (2), zlasti člena 30 teh predpisov, |
| --- | --- |

—

OB UPOŠTEVANJU Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 (1), kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 1023/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2013 o spremembi Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske unije in Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropske unije (2), zlasti člena 30 teh predpisov,

| — | OB UPOŠTEVANJU sklepa predsedstva Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. januarja 2014 o prenosu pooblastil organa za imenovanja in organa, ki je pooblaščen za sklepanje pogodb o zaposlitvi, |
| --- | --- |

—

OB UPOŠTEVANJU sklepa predsedstva Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. januarja 2014 o prenosu pooblastil organa za imenovanja in organa, ki je pooblaščen za sklepanje pogodb o zaposlitvi,

| — | OB UPOŠTEVANJU dejstva, da 31. decembra 2019 poteče veljavnost naslednjim rezervnim seznamom Evropskega parlamenta:
  PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S, PE/191/S, AD/1/13, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/4/11 (P), AST/1/13, AST/1/16, AST/2/16 (P), |
| --- | --- |

—

OB UPOŠTEVANJU dejstva, da 31. decembra 2019 poteče veljavnost naslednjim rezervnim seznamom Evropskega parlamenta:

PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S, PE/191/S, AD/1/13, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/4/11 (P), AST/1/13, AST/1/16, AST/2/16 (P),

| — | OB UPOŠTEVANJU mnenja skupnega odbora, sprejetega na seji 16. oktobra 2019 – |
| --- | --- |

—

OB UPOŠTEVANJU mnenja skupnega odbora, sprejetega na seji 16. oktobra 2019 –

SKLENE:

Člen 1

Veljavnost rezervnih seznamov:

PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/186/S, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/1/13, AST/1/16, AST/2/16 (P)

se podaljša do 31. decembra 2020.

Člen 2

Veljavnost rezervnih seznamov:

AD/1/13, PE/185/S, PE/191/S, AST/4/11 (P)

se ne podaljša.

Luxembourg, 8. novembra 2019

Klaus WELLE

Generalni sekretar

---

(1)  UL L 56, 4.3.1968, str. 1.

1

(2)  UL L 287, 29.10.2013, str. 15.

2

---
Exhibit 10.10

             ADDENDUM 4 TO THE SIMON EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF 8-01-02


         The following are amendments to the David Simon Employment Agreement
with SCHIMATIC Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc. dba Smart Chip Technologies
("Company", "SCTN" or "Employer") effective 8-01-02 as amended by Addendums on
7-28-03, 5-05-2004 and July 7, 2004.

         This Addendum to the employment agreement is to be effective as of July
1, 2004.

         For the purpose of cleaning up the "financial and stock overhang" of
the Company, as dictated by the Board of Directors, the Company and Simon agree
to the following regarding Salary and Expenses:

         1.     Under his employment agreement David Simon earned a salary of
                $12,500 per month, payable 60% per month and 40% deferred
                until the Company was able to pay. Simon hereby gives up his
                right to the 40% deferred portion of that salary, reducing his
                monthly salary to $7,500, until the Company is financially
                liquid enough to permit a reasonable salary consistent with
                industry standards.

         2.     Simon and the Company hereby agree that expense reimbursement
                payments made to Simon through this date will be considered
                settlement in full of any and all business expenses paid by
                Simon through June 30, 2004. Expenses incurred by Simon from
                July 1, 2004 and thereafter will be reimbursed by the Company
                within 30 days from the date submitted, providing the Company
                is financially able to make the payment.


I HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, I UNDERSTAND ITS TERMS, AND AGREE TO
BE BOUND BY ALL OF ITS TERMS. I ALSO UNDERSTAND I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE THIS
AGREEMENT REVIEWED BY INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on October
6, 2004.


Employer:                                                Employee:
SCTN                                                     David Simon
330 E. Warm Springs Rd.                                  2859 E. Wasatch Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV  89119                                     Sandy, UT  84092


  By: /s/ Bernard McHale                                 By:/s/ David Simon
      ------------------                                    ---------------
      Bernard McHale, Director                              David Simon


  By: /s/ Joseph E. Diamond
      ---------------------
      Joseph E. Diamond, Vice President and Director
Hillsborough

No. 78-096

#### George R. Winkler v. Marjorie L. Quackenbush, Executrix

July 18, 1978

*540
      *Sullivan, Gregg & Horton,*of Nashua *(Sherman D. Horton, Jr.,*orally), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

The issue in this case is whether a decree of divorce in favor of George R. Winkler against Phyllis L. Winkler became effective before her death.

George and Phyllis Winkler were married in 1969. Both had sons by prior marriages. In April 1975, George filed a libel for divorce. Twelve days later Phyllis executed a will leaving everything to her son Nathan Howes and made no mention of George.

The divorce action was tried contested before a marital master, *Henry P. Sullivan,*Esq., who made a report which was approved by the Court *(King,*J.), decreeing a divorce for the cause of irreconcilable differences. Real estate and a boat were decreed to George. Phyllis was awarded $30,000 as a property settlement, plus weekly alimony. A substantial amount of personal property was reviewed by the master but its division was left to the parties because agreement seemed likely. The decree was dated November 12, 1975. Under Superior Court Rule No. 74, all exceptions are deemed waived “and final judgment shall be entered on the next judgment day unless a bill of exception or proposed reserved case is filed before such judgment day. . . .” The governing judgment day for this decree was December 2, 1975.

The clerk of court notified the parties of the decree by letter dated November 14, 1975, stating that it would become effective “on December 2, 1975.” No bill of exceptions or proposed reserved case or other motion was filed before that date.

On December 2, 1975, at about 10:00 p.m. Phyllis cut her wrists and died sometime thereafter. Marjorie Quackenbush was appointed executrix of her will on December 5 and on December 15 George filed a motion for a rehearing in the divorce case. Supplemental pleadings have been filed raising issues concerning personal property rights and the payment of the $30,000. The questions whether the divorce decree became effective, of the effect of the motion for a rehearing, and of the proper forum to determine ownership of the personal property were transferred without ruling by *Flynn, J.*

Superior Court Rule No. 74, governs the effective date of the decree. The clerk’s letter was merely a statement of the effect of that rule. Under the rule, decrees become effective on the judgment day unless a bill of exceptions or proposed reserved case is filed *“before*such judgment day” [emphasis added], *R. J. Berke & Co.,*
      *541
      *Inc. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc.,*118 N.H. 449, 388 A.2d 1260 (1978). The divorce decree became effective therefore at the very beginning of the day of December 2, 1975.

The motion for rehearing filed on December 15, 1975, has no effect on the decree.

The superior court has jurisdiction to decide disputes over the personal property. *In re Bunker Estate,*110 N.H. 285, 266 A.2d 114 (1970).

*Remanded.*

Brock, J., did not sit.
§ 127.1101 Piping systems. Each piping system within the marine transfer area for LHG used for the transfer of LHG must meet the following criteria: ( a ) Each system must be designed and constructed in accordance with ASME B31.3-2020 (incorporated by reference, see § 127.003).
( b ) Each pipeline on a pier or wharf must be located so that it is not exposed to physical damage from vehicular traffic or cargo-handling equipment. Each pipeline under navigable waters must be covered or protected to meet 49 CFR 195.248.
( c ) The transfer manifold of each liquid transfer line and of each vapor return line must have an isolation valve with a bleed connection, such that transfer hoses and loading arms can be blocked off, drained or pumped out, and depressurized before disconnecting. Bleeds or vents must discharge to a safe area such as a tank or flare.
( d ) In addition to the isolation valve at the transfer manifold, each liquid-transfer line and each vapor return line must have a readily accessible isolation valve located near the edge of the marine transfer area for LHG.
( e ) Each power-operated isolation valve must be timed to close so that it will not produce a hydraulic shock capable of causing failure of the line or equipment. Unless the layout of the piping allows the isolation valve at the transfer manifold to close within 30 seconds without creating excessive stresses on the system, the layout must be reconfigured to reduce the stresses to a safe level.
( f ) Each waterfront facility handling LHG that transfers to or from a vessel requiring vapor return during transfer must be equipped with a vapor return line designed to attach to the vessel's vapor connection.
( g ) Where two or more LHGs are loaded or unloaded at the same facility, each manifold must be identified or marked to indicate each LHG it handles.
( h ) Each pipeline used to transfer flammable liquids or vapors must be provided with precautions against static, lightning, and stray current in accordance with API RP 2003 (incorporated by reference, see § 127.003).
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,043,523
<SECURITIES>                               117,790,254
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,833,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (309,746)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           138,267,958
<PP&E>                                      17,454,680
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,526,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             163,642,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       77,905,667
<BONDS>                                     45,276,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,284,737
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,175,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               163,642,687
<SALES>                                      5,853,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,963,358
<CGS>                                        3,686,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,686,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,285,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,204,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                785,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                   165,310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            620,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   620,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19<F2>
<FN>
<F1>The company has restated earnings per share to comply with the provisions of
SFAS No. 128.  Basic earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 was
restated to $.39.
<F2>Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 was restated 
to $.34.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres

DELIO BATISTA , et al,,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC. et al,

Defendants.

DEFENDANT, AVANT ASSURANCE, INC.’S NOTICE

OF FILING TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

Defendant, Avant Assurance, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel, 

hereby files five (5) Trial Transcripts for the trial which commenced on July 10, 2023.

1. Trial Transcript for July 10, 2023;

2. Trial Transcript for July 11, 2023; 

3. Trial Transcript for July 12, 2023;

4. Trial Transcript for July 13, 2023;

5. Trial Transcript for July 14, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Samuel Alexander 

Samuel Alexander

Fla Bar No. 1007757

Alexander Appellate Law P.A.

120 S Woodland Blvd Suite 200

DeLand, Florida 32720

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 123 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

(689) 259-5010

samuel@alexanderappeals.com

Counsel for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 21, 2023, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send 

a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record.

/s/ Samuel Alexander 

Samuel Alexander

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 123 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3.45-10 Sector Eastern Great Lakes Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Eastern Great Lakes' office is located in Buffalo, New York. The boundaries of Sector Eastern Great Lakes' Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone include all navigable waters of the United States and contiguous land areas within the boundaries of an area starting from a point on the international boundary in Lake Erie at latitude 42°19′24′′ N, longitude 80°31′10′′ W, proceeding southwest along the international boundary to a point at latitude 41°40′36′′ N, longitude 82°25′00′′ W; thence south to latitude 41°00′00′′ N; thence east to longitude 78°54′58′′ W; thence north to latitude 42°00′00′′ N; thence east to the east bank of the Delaware River at latitude 42°00′00′′ N, longitude 75°21′28′′ W; thence east to longitude 74°39′00′′ W; thence north to the international boundary at a point at latitude 44°59′58′′ N, longitude 74°39′00′′ W; thence southeast along the international boundary to the starting point.

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0927, 88 FR 87930, Dec. 20, 2023]
***Climate survey for   the week ending 8am***   ***April   02, 2001******April 09, 2001******April   16, 2001******April   23, 2001******April   30, 2001******May   07 , 2001******May   14, 2001******May   21, 2001******May   28, 2001******June   04, 2001******June   11, 2001******June   18, 2001******June   25, 2001******July   02, 2001******July   09, 2001******July   16, 2001******July   23, 2001******July   30, 2001******August   06, 2001******August   13, 2001******August   20, 2001******August   27, 2001******September   4 , 2001******September   10, 2001 September 17, 2001******September   24, 2001******October   1, 2001******October   7, 2001******October   14, 2001******October   22, 2001******October   29, 2001******November   05, 2001***
§ 169.135 How must the reports be made? ( a ) A ship equipped with INMARSAT C must report in IMO standard format as provided in § 169.140 in table 169.140.
( b ) A ship not equipped with INMARSAT C must report to the Coast Guard using other means, listed below in order of precedence— ( 1 ) By email to *rightwhale.msr@noaa.gov ;*
( 2 ) HF voice communication; or
( 3 ) VHF voice communications.
( c ) HF reports made directly to the Coast Guard's Communications Command (COMMCOM) in Chesapeake, VA, or VHF reports made to Coast Guard shore units, should only be made by ships not equipped with INMARSAT C. Ships in this category must provide all the required information to the Coast Guard watchstander.
[USCG-1999-5525, 64 FR 29234, June 1, 1999, as amended by 66 FR 58070, Nov. 20, 2001; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58281, Sept. 18, 2020]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of America Online Latin America, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 31, 2003                  /s/ Charles M. Herington
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Charles M. Herington
                                       Chief Executive Officer and President



Dated: March 31, 2003                  /s/ Osvaldo Banos
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Osvaldo Banos
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2022

No. 04-22-00485-CR

EX PARTE Jose Eliseo Bonilla PAZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10458CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 2, 2022, the State filed an unopposed motion to consolidate, seeking 

consolidation of this case with seventeen others and for an extension of time to file its brief. We 

DENY the motion as to consolidation, but we GRANT the motion as to the extension of time and 

ORDER the State to file its brief by January 6, 2023. The State may file the same brief in 

multiple cases, if it so desires, by placing all appellate cause numbers in the style and by filing 

the brief separately in all cause numbers. Further requests for extensions of time will be 

disfavored

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
§ 183.536 Seals and gaskets in fuel filters and strainers. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Each gasket and each sealed joint in a fuel filter and strainer must not leak when subjected for 24 hours to a gasoline that has at least a 50 percent aromatic content at the test pressure marked on the fuel tank label.
[CGD 81-092, 48 FR 55737, Dec. 15, 1983]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAUL I. EBANKS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3464

[ January 31, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 12368 CF10A

.

Paul Ebanks, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.