alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas F. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Regeneration Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Regeneration Technologies, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.



|                      |  |                                            |  |                     |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | 
|/s/    THOMAS F. ROSE |  |                                            |  | Date: June 27, 2005
|Name:                 |  | Thomas F. Rose                             |  |                     |  | 
|Title:                |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                     |  | 



6
EXHIBIT
32.1
   STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
"Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Thomas
Kidrin
 Thomas
Kidrin
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 Date:
November 14, 2008
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Peck *vs*Whitney.

Error to the Barren County Court.

Motion.

*Case*26.

Writoferrormay be brought directly to this Court from orders of County Courts establish* lishing roads.

*Jurisdiction. Roads.*

*Oct*8.

Judge Breck

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This writ of error is prosecuted to reverse an order of the Barren County Court, establishing a road, on motion of the defendant, running over land of the plaintiff in error. That an appeal or writ of error will lie directly from the County Court, in a case like this, *upon a matter oflaio,*was settled by this Court, in *Casey, &c.*vs *Myers,*(6 *Dana,*330.)

The sufficiency of the original order appointing viewers, is the first question presented by the assignment of errors.

*118The report of viewers appointed to view a way for opening a new road, held defective, in not slating the conveniencies to the public, and inconveniencies to the owner of the soil, and in not extending the view as far as ordered.

The County Ct. has no discretion in withholding a writ of *ad quod*damnum, asked by the owner of the soil over which a road is proposed.

*Ellis*for plaintiff.

The order directs the viewers “to view the rout for a road from the nearest point on the Gallatin road, to said Whitney’s Mill to the mouth of the Alder Spring branch, thence up the creek to the Mill, and that they report to the Court the conveniencies and inconveniencies which will result to the public and to individuals.” We perceive no valid objection to this order, but think it is substantially in compliance with the requisitions of the statute.

2d. It is insisted that the report of the viewers is defective and insufficient.

The report does not specifically set out the advantages and conveniencies, which will result to the community, from the establishment of the road, nor the particular inconvenience and disadvantage it will be to Peck. This should have been done; but it is fatally defective in not extending the view further than the mouth of *the branch.*The order directed the way to be viewed to the mouth of the *Alder Spring branch, thence up the creek to the Mill.*

3d. It is contended, and we are of opinion the Court erred, in refusing to direct a writ of *ad quod damnum*on motion of Peck. The proposed road was to run over his land, and he was entitled to the writ, as matter of right. The record shows that he appeared in Court when the case came on for hearing, and demanded it., and the Court had no discretion in withholding it. The statute upon the subject is imperative, (2 *Stat. Laws,*1394.)

The order establishing the road is, therefore, reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to quash the report of the viewers, and for further proceedings,
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Southern Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/David M. Ratcliffe

David M. Ratcliffe

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/W. Paul Bowers

W. Paul Bowers

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

                             |

 

 

Date:  November 6, 2008
§ 187.13 What are the procedures for obtaining certification of compliance with guidelines for State vessel titling systems? ( a ) A State must submit a written request to the Commandant (CG-5422). The request must include a copy of the State's titling laws, regulations and administrative procedures, and certify that the State will comply with the VIS participation requirements in subpart C of this part.
( b ) The Commandant will review the request and determine if the State is complying with the Guidelines for State Vessel Titling Systems in subpart D of this part. If the State is complying with the guidelines, the Commandant will certify compliance and list the State in appendix B to this part.
( c ) Appendix B to this part will list States certified by the Commandant. When the Commandant determines that a State is not complying with the vessel titling guidelines, it will lose its certification and be deleted from appendix B to this part.
[USCG-1999-6420, 66 FR 15630, Mar. 20, 2001, as amended by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35024, June 19, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.703 Bass River. The draw of the U.S. 9 bridge, mile 2.6, at New Gretna, shall operate as follows: ( a ) The drawspan must open on signal if at least six hours notice is given, except that public vessels of the United States must be passed as soon as possible.
( b ) The owners of this bridge shall provide and keep in good legible condition clearance gauges for the draw span with figures not less than 12 inches high designed, installed and maintained in accordance with the provisions of § 118.160 of this chapter.
[CGD5-91-031, 57 FR 22175, May 27, 1992, as amended by USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70311, Dec. 4, 2006]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR957000-L14200000-BJ0000: HAG11-309]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management 
Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date 
of this publication.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 24 S., R.4 W., accepted July 18, 2011,
T. 23 S., R.4 W., accepted July 18, 2011,
T. 8 S., R. 19 E., accepted July 20, 2011,
T. 22 S., R. 3 W., accepted July 21, 2011,
T. 28 S., R. 10 W., accepted July 21, 2011,
T. 3 S., R 45 E., accepted July 22, 2011.

Washington

T. 18 N., R. 9 W., accepted July 20, 2011.


ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State Office, 333 SW. 
1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or 
party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that 
they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Hensley, (503) 808-6124, Branch 
of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, 
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before including your address, phone number, 
e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your 
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your 
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any 
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

Fred O'Ferrall,
Chief, Branch of Land, Mineral, and Energy Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-21172 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  ADR Outcomes at the CBCA

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/ADR Outcomes at the CBCA ADR Outcomes at the CBCAADR2022-02-17T18:50:50-05:00
			
			ADR Outcomes at the CBCADepending on the type ADR used, a variety of goals may be realized.  A dispute may be narrowed, resolved partially, or settled completely; a relationship may be repaired with the parties learning how to communicate more effectively; and/or an innovative solution that may not have been available through litigation may be utilized.  The parties might address and reach agreement on how they will move forward in the future so that future potential controversies are more effectively processed.  Such outcomes, often not available through more traditional litigation, are part of the beauty of using ADR in the procurement arena.
The parties should typically come to an ADR proceeding prepared to address the dispute with good faith discussions.  They should also have a draft settlement agreement prepared and ready to be jointly finalized and executed at the conclusion of the proceeding.  If no agreement is reached, the parties normally go back into the disputes process where they left off and the neutral judge typically withdraws and removes or recuses himself or herself from any further activity with the case, unless the parties request that the judge remain on the case.  The case goes back into the litigation process before the presiding judge, or another judge is assigned to decide the appeal if the presiding judge conducted the ADR proceeding.  This way, any concessions made for settlement purposes during the ADR remain private from the judge deciding the case. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Harvey R. Blau, Chief Executive Officer ofAeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporatedfor the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

 
|   |   | /s/ Harvey R. Blau     |
|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   |                   |
|   |   | Name: Harvey R. Blau   |
|   |   |                   |
|   |   | Date: February 7, 2007 |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporatedand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
§ 181.9 Affixing labels. ( a ) Each manufacturer of a boat or item of associated equipment to which a standard or regulation prescribed in Part 183 of this chapter applies shall affix a certification label that contains the information required by § 181.15 to that boat or equipment before it: ( 1 ) Leaves the place of manufacture for the purpose of sale; or
( 2 ) Is imported.
( b ) The manufacturer of a boat or item of associated equipment that is sold to a private label merchandiser may, at the option of the private label merchandiser, affix a certification label identifying the private label merchandiser as the manufacturer before the boat or item of associated equipment leaves the place of manufacture.
United States Steel Corporation – Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 10

Identify the manufacturer, including contact information, for all low NOX burners,

SCR, scrubber, overfire air, and induced flue gas technologies considered technically

feasible for use at the facility.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or 

were consulted in the preparation of the response:

Darren Gietzen (Hatch Engineering), Chrissy Bartovich, Teresa Simetkosky, Stephani Campbell

Answer:

The following are vendors/consultants which we have worked with on various technologies. 

Although other manufacturers exist for the equipment listed below, these are the manufacturers

we have worked with.

Low NOx Pre-heat burners:

Manufacturer: Fives North American

Contact Information: Jack Cochenour – (412) 655-0101 ext 111

Low NOx Main Burner:

Manufacturer: Coen

Contact Information: Bob Wakelee – (650) 522-2165

Line 6 Dry Scrubber:

Engineering Firm: Hatch

Contact Information: Dave Mysko – (412) 497-2128

Manufacturer: FL Smidth

Contact Information: Kevin Tran – (610) 264-6215

We have not included information on SCR, overfire air or induced flue gas technologies as we 

do not believe they are technically feasible. Information provided in Item 8 shows that even a 

SCR vendor says they believe the equipment will not work in our system.
Exhibit 12**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                                   **As Restated**   **2007**  **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003** Income before taxes $(32,041) $65,709  $110,594  $96,652  $39,773 Plus: Fixed Charges                    Interest expense  362,531   327,714   212,583   140,762   132,612                      Rent Expense  3,574   3,423   2,309   1,956   1,819                 Total fixed charges (includinginterest on deposits)  366,105   331,137   214,892   142,718   134,431 Less: Interest on deposits  (191,415)  (173,380)  (122,212)  (60,279)  (56,030)                Total fixed charges (excludinginterest on deposits)  174,690   157,757   92,680   82,439   78,401                      Income before income taxes andfixed charges(including interest on deposits) $334,064  $396,846  $325,486  $239,370  $174,204 Income before income taxes andfixed charges(excluding interest on deposits) $142,649  $223,466  $203,274  $179,091  $118,174 Dividend on P/S  —   —   —   —   7,063 Ratio of Earnings to fixedcharges                    Including interest on deposits  0.91      x  1.20      x  1.51      x  1.68      x  1.30      xExcluding interest on deposits  0.82      x  1.42      x  2.19      x  2.17      x  1.51      x                     Ratio of Earnings to fixedcharges andpreferred stock dividends                    Including interest on deposits  0.91      x  1.20      x  1.51      x  1.68      x  1.23      xExcluding interest on deposits  0.82      x  1.42      x  2.19      x  2.17      x  1.38      x
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37-451A and TA-W-37-451B] 

      ( print page 36471)    
                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 4, 2000, applicable to workers of Cross Creek Apparel, Inc., Walnut Cove, North Carolina. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 21, 2000 (65 FR 21473).                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the determination for workers of the subject firm. New information provided by the company shows that worker separations will occur at Cross Creek's Newport, North Carolina facility when it closes in July, 2000. The workers are engaged in employment related to the production of knit apparel. Accordingly, the Department is amending the determination to cover workers of Cross Creek Apparel, Inc., Newport, North Carolina.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Cross Creek Apparel, Inc. adversely affected by increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,451A is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Cross Creek Apparel, Inc., Walnut Cove, North Carolina (TA-W-37,451A) and Newport, North Carolina (TA-W-37,451B) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 21, 1999 through April 4, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington DC, this 1st day of June, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-14469  Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 15(a)

                                                    Arthur Andersen









November 7, 2000


Alabama Power Company
600 North 18th Street
Birmingham, Alabama  35291



Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that Alabama Power Company has incorporated by reference in
Registration Statement 333-67453 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2000 which includes our report on Alabama Power Company dated November 7,
2000 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein.
Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by
our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ODRA Mediation in Protests","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iSoXJsEo6s\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/08-odra\/\">ODRA Mediation in Protests<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/08-odra\/embed\/#?secret=iSoXJsEo6s\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ODRA Mediation in Protests” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"iSoXJsEo6s\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}