IN Tlv UNITED STATESD ISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICTOFR ORIDA

W EST PALM BEACH D IVISION

DONALD J.R'RUM P,

Plainhy No.9:22-&-81294-AMC

V.

Dated:October3,2022

UN ITED STATESOF AM ERICA,

JURY TRIALDEM ANDED

Defendant

FILED BY Z D.C.

0ST 232222

ANGELAE.NOBLE

CLERKU S DISI CI

s.o.oFF'LA.-w.p.B.

M OVANT-W TERW NOR (PRO SEI-lG IK.PATEL'S

TH IRD AM EN DED D KT.87

1,T.E.,T.ERAJK.PATEL,theundersignedmovm t-intervenorprosc,in theabovenamedcase,withapendingmodonatDkt.36,herebysubmitthis%tp.nmendedreply

toDefendant-united StatesofAmerica'sResportseatDkt.48,wltichiswrittentobean

addidontoDkt.60(duplicatefilingatDkt.61),orasmyresporusetoDefendant'sModon

atDkt.69.L.R.7.1(c)(2)(10pages,f'rontandback).Amenlments. eeen:Amen<ments

hir:Amen<menié

WHEREAS,''AtlomeyGeneralBrewsterexplainedmoreth> acenturyago,'ltlhere

aretwokindsofofscialterm s'...onekind of'term 'referstoaperiodofpersonalservice.

ln thatcase,'the term isappm tenantto theperson'...Anotherkind of'term 'refersto

ajxedslotoffipzdtowhichintlividualappointeesareassigned...rfhere,'thepersonisappurtenanttotheterm '...lnotherw ords,a'term ofoffice'can eitherrun w1t1:theperson

orwitlathecalendap''UnitedStatesp.Wilson,290F.3d347,353(D.C.Cir.2002)(quoting

1

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 1 of 23
Iber@;57: U.S.(* 3.',ï?,1?p2,133S.@t.2.74* ,3472(6:139and,

W HEREAS,thePresidendalRecordsAct,44U.S.C.jj2201-D 09,m akestheformer

PresidentapartoftheExecudveBTD CIA,and m orespee cally thePresidencp W ilson,

290F.3d at353& Federalist78;and,

W HEREAG,execudveprivilege''safeguardsthepublicinterestin candid,confidem

daldeliberadonswitltintheExecudveBranch;itis'hzndamentaltotheoperadonofGovernmentw'''Trumpv.M azarsU.5.,LLP,140S.Ct.2019,2032(U.S.2020:and,

WHEREM ,allPresidendaldata''Iislpreslmpdvelyprivileged,''Nàonv.Sirica,487

F-2d700,716(D.C.Cir.1973)9and,

WHEREAR,''informationsubjecttoexectdveprivilegedeserves'thegreatestprotecdonconsistentwiththefairadminiskadonofjusdce/''Mazars,140S.Ct.at2024(quotingUnitedStatesp.Nixon,418U.S.683,715(1974));and,

W HEREAG,''ltlhelaighrespectthatisowedtotheofhceofthe'ChiefExecudve...is

am atterthatshouldinform theconductoftheendreproceedinp''Clintonp. Jones,520

U.S.681,705,117S.Ct.1636,1650-51(1997),andthatthereisatradidonoffederalcottrts'

affording ''the uM ostdeference to Presidendalresponsibilides Clinton,117 S. Ct.at

1652,''InreLindsq,158F.3d1263,1280(D.C.Cir.1998)y'tquotingNixon,418U.S.at710-

11)(internalquotadonmarksomittedl);and,

W l-lbTREAs,''Itlheauthoritytoprotectnadonalseclxrityinformadonfallsonthe

Presidentz''Dep'toftheNlz.l/p.Egan,484U.S.518,527(1988),seealso,e.g.,Mumhyv.Sec'y,

U.5.Dep'tofArmy,769Fed.Appx.779,792(111 Cir.2019),&Dkt.69at13;and,

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 2 of 23
W HFXEAG,forpurposesofPresidendalRecordsA ctstheincllmbentPresidentwho

transitiorkstoformerPresidenl'isan''agent''ofthepeople,Egan,484U.S.at529,Federalist78,& Dkt.69at18;and,

W HARIIAS,theSuprem eCourthasem phasizedthatprivilegeclnim s,''m ustbeconsideredinlightofourltistoriccommie enttotheruleoflaw''and''Itlheneedtodevelop

allrelevantfactsin theadversarysystem ,''N ixon,418U.S.at708-09& Dkt.69at9;and,

WHEREAG,''liln theperformanceofassigned cozusdtudonaldudes,(Execudve

brancltloftheGovernmentmustinidalyinterprettheCozusdtudon,and...-fhePresident'scounsel,aswehavenoted,readstheConsdtudon asproviding anabsoluteprivilege ofconfidentiality forallPresidentialcom mllnicadonsw''Nixon,418U.S.at703-4,28

'

U . (.'. g y. S.C.j516,Vargasxk..Unite: Aates,114 Fe:.@l.2+6,244(ê@14$(Thegevernment

relianeeen38U.S..'.Jxr'.j514ismisr4I.as.e.:G.'')'kr&seegenerallyDavu h.Strauss,''Presidendal

InterpretadonoftlteConstitution/'15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-135(1993)19and,

W HEREAS,in otherw ords,''execudvebranch m ustinterprettheConsdtution beforeitcan deddew hattodoz''seegenerallySkauss,15CardozoL. Rev.at113-135;and,

W HEREAS,theSupremeCotrthas''rejectledltheargumentthatonlyaninclmbent

Presidentmayassert'separadon-of-powersdnims,Nàonv.Adm'rofGen..sE'rps.,433U.S.

425,439(1977/and,

W I-IEREAS,thereisan intem al,herizenlalan< vertila,iseparadon ofpow erson interpretingtheCorlsdtufonw itlùntheExecutiveBranch;and,

1.DavidA.Strauss,''PzesidendalInterpretadonoftheCorusdtutioa ''15CardozoL. Rev.113,113-

135 (1993), https:/kchicagounbound.uclu'cago.edu/cp'kviewcontent.cp'?referer=c % sredl=l&arhclez/oo6&context=journalaruclesipresidential.

3

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 3 of 23
W HRREAR,privilegeandim m tm idesm aybetlsedtosustain separadon ofpow ers

insidebranchesofgovernm entand acossgovernm entsundertheUnited StatesConstitudon;and,

W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDeparpmentofStateisresponsibleforinterpretingand

elaboratingonthePrivilegesandImmlnidesClause,U.S.const.art.lV,j2;

W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDeparM entofStateshow sitselaboradononthe PrivilegesandImmtmidesG auseintheUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedencebytheOfficeof

the ChiefofProtocol,h% s:/kwww.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/zozz/oz/uotedStates-order-of-precedence-Febme -zor .pdf(revisedFeb.11,2022)& U.S.const.art.

1V,5k and,

W HEREAS,theUnited StatesDepartm entofJusdce,theAttorneyGeneral,orU.S.

Atlom eyJuanGonzales,didnotfollow theUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedencedulyestablishedbytheOfficeoftheCltiefofProtocol,Id.;and,

W HEREAG,theinclmbentPresidentoftheUnited Stateshassupported theUnited

StatesOrderofPrecedencehousedbytheUnitedStatesDeparM entofStateOo ceofthe

ClziefofProtocol,whichshow sthétformerPresidentTrlzmpoutrankqincumbentAtlorneyGeneralM erric.kGarland,Id.& 3U.S.C.jj301etsef/.,an: Hellln@sweAh,13% 6.lt

t3473-74Yreyençmis''areneteleeted''an:''tïeeideforlhemselves,wilhnereview

ha1arguments1(.)wake an: hew 1e m akelhem ''in defensesf1heenaeled îniialive,...

.hese same Ghargespo ul: be Ievele:wilh e.ualifnetgreaterfereeat1he s.eeialyres

.

eeutersjust(jjseussezotj,#g)ana,

4

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 4 of 23
W I.Tb7REAS,thus,theUnited StatesDeparM entofState and theUnited StatesDeparfm entofJusdceareadversariesinou.rsystem ofruleoflaw,inordertocreateaseparadonofpowersandchecksandbalance,butcf.DoclrineofComitp U.S.corust.art.lV,j

2,& 28U.S.C.j516;and,

W T-IbTRUAS,theincllmbentPresidentoftheUnitedStateshasnotcleared,norm ay

rata'fytmconstitudonaladstomakethem coxzsdtudonal/breachofprotocol;and,

W l4EI4EAS,theexecudveDeparfm entsanditsH eadshavebeen created,byanAct

pfCongress,and appointed by thePresident,w1t1:adviceand consentfrom theSenate,

Frqtagv.Comm'r,501U.S.868,886,917(1991)(discussingHeadsandprincipalofficers

oftheexecudvedeparM ents);and,

W I-TRREAS,theExecudveBranch's''interpretadonofitsIown)powers...isduegreat

respect9om theothersz''Nixon,418U.S.at703-* and,

't'JAfeiH:47&' ' -zACr,wcx:kVs k -.# . 'i; ' ':'.> #i - :' 'a '

kïctkg..E....R.

.EAS?f..tqs.,lm.qr.Pres. ld.ent.s..

r,ke..,xt.a-,!,'n$,,a- .e1,u.,a.

'Ia.pgyh(.)r.!ky te b.lnd.the Gevermxqoi,eqt.lp-of.

',k1p.u';n'l't*ed. Sta'tes16'èpntraetuaI(#)br. lJt>zgalionsn.ecwssav ioearyeut>hed-rtles>f,lhe. e-il1

t;<Q-'9.;#. '7' .''e vq-.e.,+.k -' . ''' 'jJ--â?'* ' -'' ' 1' ' '''- - 1t

,n.).l.cque leg.. a1(.)f-,f'Ieq,$,Ir4.e,lrud.1Inq.- In C..(e).,.r.?',q.-.ress .UInt1t.ed.StatesCeurtefFed.eral@. la1ms,T.h.,.0.

kje,ker.A.

. e, !s:kpt,38'Ut.S#C.tl'j.ltj. 1j'4V(;)&14:91.,S<chPlsm v.t4rn.IetMedStaites,31t:F..31 1.21S.=%.,. 1.3:64:

2.Unde.rthecommonlaw,theincumbentKingm aychangeprotocolat-wilagainstaformerHead

ofStateoraprecedingM onarch;thosevestedpowersareembeddedintheUnitedStatesCortstitudonand

remnin constanttmtillaw flllyamended.Besides,asthecom plaintand Atlom eyGeneral'sM errickGarland'spublic,apolitical,andlegalcomm entsshow,fnlrrentlp onlyaunitofanFaxectzdvebranchhasacted,

i.e.theDepartmentofJusdc&RB.1.,ratlzerthantheExecutivebranchaswhole.Dkt.1at10.Tonosurprise,

evenagainstaformerpresident,inordertolegallycondidonthepeacefultrnnsidonofpower,theExecudve

powerismuchweakerthanofacommonlaw King's.UnitedStatesv.ProvidcnceJournalCo.,485U.S.693,

701(1988)(morethanone''UnitedStates''Ls''startlinr l.M8lh'qb'Y/hiv'.hW lïbXmdtiv nsv-.tp li.O ''S-i7#i@:

fLy4-t=jf.fz'':tv.'p.1'!.-j.t)..j,.JJ.J-')d-(AIiti,.J.,,d-iss.ellja:)(').ej..,rq@t,,.i,t..q.!ï,. -vs-ç/e.-il'k'..q.ylt4..fagy.e-srgle. emmemIaw''hasu. yi.pq. @,

'irjtAiqlstsl'

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 5 of 23
*6(Fe*.@ir.2ê(e ),è.ê,,..p. supra,..15n.6,an* kute/1Hellin@swerth,133S.*t.at2667

WHEREAS,''(a111powersoflaw enforcement...areassignedtmderottrCorusdtution

totheExecudveandtheJudidarp''Quinnv.UnitedStates,349U.S.155,161(1955).

THEREFORE,onlyaunitoftheExecudveBranch,thecurrentAttorneyGeneral,has

broughtchargesagainstform erPresidentTrump inviolation oftheintenworkingsofthe

executivebranchprotocol,orderedbytheincllm bentPresidentBiden,ashousedbyPresidentBiden'ssubordinates,w ho arealso eithertheAtlorney General'ssuperiorsorcoequalsonthesubject-matter,intheUnitedStatesDepartmentofState.

FURTIV RMORE,thePresident,thecourts,ortheExecutiveBranch cannotm utedisdncdonsofoffice,person,state,and governm ent,astheyarean elaboradonoftheUnited

StatesConsdtudonPrivilegesandImmtmitiesG ause,wltichlaysoutthestructureand

lnnesOfenforcement.P'efndexiterv.Greenhew,114U.S.2*7:,29@(1:84$(Wlhe<islinelie

between1hegevernpentefaSlale and1he Stateitselfisim .ertant,an:kskalqkeeb

zz ' '

=

''' :, erved. )(underlïnekàd-1'p:d,j

,qdedl'

WHEREAS,inorderforafederaldistrictcourtof1aw tohavepersonaljurisdicdon,

tmderFed.R.Civ.12(b)(2),kaditionalnodonsof''naturaljustice,''''fe plap''and''substandaljusdce''mustataltimenotbeviolated,Mcfbncldv.Mabee,243U.5.90,92(1917),

JointAnti-FascistComm.p.M cGtmh,M 1U.S.123,123(1951$Breithauptr.Abram,352U.S.

432,435(1957)(shocktheconscience,traclidonalnodonsoffairplayanddecencpindicia

ofnotapeacefulkansidonofpowercausedbyDefendant-Dolisavioladonoftheconsdence),Gonzalesv.UnitedStates,348U.S.407,412(1955)(''tmderlyingconceptsofprocedm alregularityandbasicfairplay''),Jnf'lShoeCo.v.Washington,326U.S.310,324&

6

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 6 of 23
326(1945),UnitedStatesv.Lovasco,431U.S.783,796(1977)(dueprocessembodies''ftmdamentalconcepdonsofjusdce''and''thecommlnity'ssenseoffairplayanddecencf')

(secFedernlist77,UnitedStatesasacommlAnity),Cnty.ofSacramentov.Lewis,523U.S.

833,847(1998)(conscience-shockingbehaviorLs''so'brutal'and'offensive'thatit(doesl

notcomportwithtradidonalideasoffairplayanddecencp'')(abuseofexecudvepower)

(decenciesof''dvilizedconduct,''epitomizedinU.S.const.art.lV,j2)(bowingand

curtsyamongstandtostateactorsortheeffectinotzrcommtmity),& Sessionsv.Dimaya,

138S.Ct.1204,1212(2018)(Tequiredbyboth''ordinarynotionsoffairplayandthesettled

rulesoflaw.'');ands

WHEREAS,kadidonalnotiorusofnaturaljusticestatesaformerT.H.(T.E.)President

oftheUnitedStates(T.E.PresidentoftheUnitedStatesfora1ldocumentsforeignafairs),

from theNaturalState,ismorefitth= thecurrentcourt(judgeandDefendant)andthe

NaturalOrderdemandsthattheincllmbentAttorneyGeneralyieldtopressingcharges

againstPlaindff,ourform erH eadofState,seeUnited StatesOrderofPrecedence-united

StatesDep'tofState-officeoftheCltiefofProtocol,U.S.corst.art.1V,j2,&Dkt.60at2,

5,5n.3,& 7;and,

WHEREAG,tradidonalnodonsofbasicfairplayandsubstantialjusdcehavebeen

violated,seee.g.Obergefellr.Hodges,576U.S.644,742(2015)(harshtreatmentisnotfair

play)(gaysandlesbianshavebeendeniedtheNaturalOrder,pursuanttotheiradaievem entsin dvilsodetp asthew ealthiestcom m tmitp particularly,gaym en,in theUnited

States;thesam eillnesshasentered stateand governm entalinsdtutions, preventing the

7

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 7 of 23
NaturalOrder,indudingingoverningtheDefendant'sdedsiorus)(Plaintiffhasbeendeniedrighthilplacein theaftermath ofhishonor'sincumbencyasPresidentofUnited

Statesp&Pet.forWdtofCert.*58-9,Patelv.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202-);and,

W HEREAS,even with explicitinform ed cortsentthePlaintiffcannotavailhim self

beforethiscourtbecauselaisavailm entcannotovercom etheviolation kaditionalnodons

offairplap naturaljusdce,andsubstandaljusdceasappliedtothecotrtandanypossible

nalingbythiscourt,U.S.const.art.1V,j2& sccalsoUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedenceUnited StatesD ep'tofState-ofsceoftheChiefofProtocol;and,

WHRREAG,thiscourtcannotatlac.hpersonaljurisdicdontothePlaintiffasitwould

violatethetraditionalnodonsoffairplap naturaljustice,andsubstantialjustice,and,

tlm s,itsopinion would onlybeadvisory;and,

W I-IEREAS,in addidon,thecorollarytoPlaintiff'sform erPresidendalprivilege,im -

mtmity,isthecotrt'slimitedjudidalreview,Federalist78,U.S.const.art.1V,j2,al't.III

(originalintent),&amend.V.Marburyp.Madison,5U.S.137(1803).

TI-IEREFORE,tltisCourtshoulddismisssuasponfcunderFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2),as

theCourtdoesnothavepersonaljllriqdicdonforPlaintif,orFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6),for

failuretostateadaim uponwltich reliefcanbeg'ranted,asthereisnoenforcem entm echanism torequirethePlaintiff,theform erH ead ofStateandform erPresident,whoisalso

Privileged,pertlzeN aturalState,and isIm m une,pertheN aturalStatetoo;thedefidenciescan only be cured bynew chargesbroughtdirectly by tlteincum bentPresident,by

hisow n colm selor,ratherthan theinnlm bentAttom ey General.

FURTHERMORE,thenodonsofnaturaljusdce,fairplay,andsubstandaljusdcebutkesscastledoctdne,asgenerally applied,and Plaintiff'scastlecan llniquely,alongw ith

3.https://-ec-prod-requests.s3-us-west-z.amazonaws.com /W age-Gap-Appendh.pdf.

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 8 of 23
thepastPresidents,can withstand allforcesexceptthosedirec'tly and consdtutionally

com m andedbytheincllm bentPresidentse.g.UnitedStatesSecretServiceorunitedStates

Arm edandSpaceForce.SeeDkt.60at2,5,5n.3,& 7.Thisisalso because due process

cannotoverride a Privilege orIm munity,and substantive due processisconsiderate of

Privilegesan2 Immunities,pqrtileFederalistandAnti-Federalistcontrau oftheBilof

Riglits,andtheinterestofthe#oupàers'andAroenàerstopresewethecultureofour

Nation.U.S.constart.IV,j2&amend.XIV,j2:cI.1,-Lovasco,431U.S.at798,.Feder9list80.(''Itmaybeesteemedtl'kegasiso-fthe.Union,tkat'/thecitizensof. eachVat. eshal

beentitledtoailtheprivilegesanJimmunitiësofcitizensoft4eseveralStates.''AnJif

itbeajpstprinciplethateverygovemmentOUGHYTO COSSESSTHEkEAQSUFEXùcùi-lkp l-rjqWN pRovlsioùjBy'l'rsoWNkù'tHoRlTy.'');pet.f'orWritofèert.*

58-9,Patelv.LlniteàStates,No..22-5280(UIS.202.3.(& compareU.S.const.art.IV,jj

'1-2jzwithU.S.const.art.VI,j1referrinqtoArticles-ofConfederation(1781),art.lV,paras.

1&b(';Theùettertosecureandperpetuatemutualfriendshipandintercourseamong

1hepeopleofthediferentStatesinthisUnion(i.e.,DoctrineofComityinU.S.const.art.

IV,j21,theieeinhabitantsoleachoftheseStates,paupersfvaga.

bo.pds,and. ju-sitives

hom justiceexcepted,shalbeentitledtoaIlprivilegesandimmunitiesoffreec2lt';lzensin

!heseveralStatesir..providedalsothatnoimposition,dutiesorrestrictionshaljbelaid

byanyState,onthepropertyo'ftheUnitedStates,oreitkerofthem.-''//''FuIlfaithand

VedftshalbegivenineachoftheseVatestotherecords,acts,andjpdicialproceedïngs

9

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 9 of 23
ofthecour'tsandmagistratesofeveryotherState.'')(l''magistrates''replacedwith''citizen'')(seeDkt.21at13)(seealpo Patelv.United States,No.1:21-cv-O2O04-LAS(Fed.

CI.202- ),Dkt.1at9-10n.6/.

UxoERn D.R.Cw .P.24,lhaveacomm onquestionof1aw orfad orinterestinthe

transacdonbecauseafavorablerulingtotheDefendantcan violatem y Excellencies,the

style/dtles,and my careerand statesm anship by extension oftltisruling amongstlicensed Governm entalactors,local,state,federal,and internadonal,who m ightsym pa-

. . . 7 '''. l'lnlze'w1 l'hlsCot?r,.''t,skHunegn.st.lt.ut..le'.ntaCl'o.I'u,,.

W HEREAS,theSuprem eCout'thasheld thataform erPresidentm aynotsuccessfully assertexecutiveprivilegeagainstreview by ''thevery ExecutiveBranch inw hose

nnm etheprivilegeisinvoked,''Nixon,433U .S.at447-48& Dkt69at8;4and,

W HEREAS,exem tivePrivilegeand execudveIm m tm ityaTecorollaries,butdistinct

concepts,U.S.const.art.IV,j2& nmend.XlV,j1,c1.29and,

W HEREAS,assertingonenecessnrilyim putestheasserdon oftheother,Id.;and,

W HEREAS,form erUnited StatesPresidentTrum p m ay mssertexecudvelm m unity

from United StatesGovernm entalforcewhich isnottm derthecom m and oftlaeincum -

bentUnitedStatesPresident,M .;and,

W HEREAS,inthehappeningsrelated toNixon,433U.S.at425,incumbentPresident

GeraldFordwasintimatelyinvolvedinprosecutingformerPresidentNixoa Id.&cf.Dkt.

1at10;andz

4.AnF.B.I.cannotdnim executivePrivilegeagairtsttheincqzm b. entAttorneyGeneral,butaformer

Presid. vntcandaim execut.ivvPriv.ilege(iv prvsidentialPriv.ilvge)againsttheincxlmbentAttomeyGeneral.

Respecdvely,theindependentconceptofexecutivelm munityappliesswhichfavorstheformerPresident

againsttheirtfnlmbentAttom eyGeneral.

10

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 10 of 23
'

W H œEAs,here,asilnlikein thehappeningsrelated toNixon,433U .S.at425,the

incllm bentPresidentisnotintim ately involved againstthe prosecudon of President

Biden,PHH & rg.p.ConsumerFinancialProtedionBureau,839F.3d1,12-13(D.C.Cir.2016)

(Madisonianpresidendalconkol),seeM organp.UnitedStates,304U.S.1,22(1938)(holdingthatitis''notthefunctionofthecourttoprobethementalprocessesofthelExec'w

t4ve)''),andDkt.1at10;and,

W HEREAS,here,the topicsofdocllm entsare related to foreign policp llnlike in

Nixon,433U.S.at425,where,thedocum entsw ererelated todom esticpolicy;and,

W HFREASmorespecificallyandm ateriallp aformerPresident/l-leadofStateoutrankstheincumbentAttom eyGeneralinforeignreladonsand diplom adcm atter,wltich

are exclusively reserved forthe President'srecognidon,seexg&zcvwllyProvidenceJournal,

485U.S.at701(moreth= one''UnitedStates''is''staelingvl;and,

W HEREAS,the incum bentPresident,theUnited StatesOrderofPrecedence duly

establishedbytheOfficeoftheChiefofProtocol,andthePresidentialRecordsA ctshow

thattheform erpresiden/ carryon offidaldudes,whichcom ew1t11omnipresentprivileges and im m llnides,wbich are absolute exceptatagainstan incllm bentPresident,

Nixon,418U.S.at703-4&Scheuerr.Rhodes,416U.S.232,239,241,244,&248,(1974)9and,

W HEREAS,tlveConstitutionalpowerofexecudvePrivilegeand/orexecutiveImm unityofaform erPresident,thus,m ay belawflllly asserted agairksttheincllmbentDeparM entofJusdce,U.S.cortst.art.lV,j2& amend.XIV,j1,c1.2,M urrayv.Bush,No.

06-C-0781*1(E.D.W is.Aug.31,2006)(''whethertheactionisgivolousorm alicious,or

seeksreliefhnm animmuneparfy,orfailstostateaclaim onwltic.hreliefmaybegranted.''l

(italicsadded)(internaldtadorusomitted);c.f28U.S.C.j1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);Wiliamsp.

Holmes,No.1:17-cv-00799-KOB *1(N.D.Ala.Sep.5,2017);M alcolm v.Cf.yofM iami,No.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 11 of 23
22-cv-20499-K1NG/DAMIAN *2,4,& 6(S.D.Fla.Mar.7,2022);&Listerv.De'jofTreaszfny,408F.3d1309(101 Cir.2005/and,

W HEREAS,thePlaintiffcan law fully possessthedksputedUnited Statesrecords,44

U.S.C.j2202;and,

W HRREAS,theFed.R.Civ.P.8(c)(1)alow fortheafirmadvedeferksesofillegality

(Defendant'splayin obtainingPresidendalRecords),licerkse(U.S.cozkst.art.lV,j2),

laches(Defendantshouldhaveactedqttickeriftrtlysuspidousofnadonalsecurity),or

uncleanhands(DefendantshouldhaveinvolvedtheinctmbentPresidentoftheUnited

States);and,

W HEREAS,thisCourtisin Com ityw ith both Plaintiffand Defendant,and hasthe

privilegeofservingeachpartyinhis/her/theirindividualcapadtp DockineofComity,

U.S.const.art.1V,j2.

TIW REFORE,thePlaintiffisim m unefrom prosecudonfrom theDefendant,andthe

Courtshould return a11recordstoplaindff,PresidentTnlm p,and orderchargesagainqt

I'heHonorableGarlandforconversion,''treasonv/''war /'/atac.k''andrebellion orinsm rection.U.S.const.art.111,j3)18U.S.C.j2381)& ProvidenceJourAlfl,485U.S.at701.

FURTIV RMORE,lm dertheCortsdtudonalScdon,wltich starts,atam inim um ,w ith

thecorporatechartersmentionedintheDeclaradonofIndependence(1776),thelocal,

excellentcorporationsand otherlocalauthoritieshavedevolvedpowerto theFederal

Sovereign,muchm oreth* theSisterStateshavetotheFederalSovereign;thus,theinterestin thetrnnsaction isa check on theDevolved Sovereigntp Faithfully ordered by

me,theintervenor,andasataxpayer.U.S.const.al't.lV,jjI-2& art.W ,j1;Federalist

78;& 42U.S.C.jj2000bbetseq.SeealsoW ltiteHouseOfficeoflntergovem mentalM fairs,

htps:/pww w.wlaitehouse.gov/iga/.

12

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 12 of 23
W HEREAS,barring subordinate ExecudveBranch from review ing and using the

dassified recordsforcrim inalinvesdgatespurposesisam eaningfulw ay ofprotecting

''theconfiden:alityofPresidentialcom m unicadoxts,''Nixon,418U.S.at705& contra.Dkt.

69at10;and,

W HEREAS,thereasonsPresidentsorthecourtsallow independentpersonnelacross

theIntelligence Com m llnity to review thevery sam e recordsforotherdosely related

purposesbutnottherem ainderoftheExecudveBranch do nothave to berevealed in

ordertoprotecttheconfidentialityofPresidendalRecords,Nixon,418U.S.at705;and,

W HITREAS,technocrafs arethepersonnelacossthelntelligenceCom m unityw ho

usuallyreceivetheserecordsandwhosenarrow objedivesarepreciselycodified,lnlike

in thenot-independentExecutiveBranch w ereparisans,party m em bers,form erm em -

bersofCongress,andbureaucratswhoareaccountabletovarying interests,such asforeign H eads ofState and inter-governm entalorganizations and those hierarchies,are

likely toreceiveandbeexposed theserecords;and,

W HEREAS,an affirm anceofthe defaultprotectionistruleofPresidentialRecords

willallow theRepublictoremninOneandintact,Nixon,418U.S.at705,Providencelournal,

485U.S.at701,Nixon,433U.S.at447-9,&Heinv.FreedomHom RelifonFound.,Inc.,551

U.S.587(2007)(Rather,theywere''createdentirelywithintheexecudvebranch...byPresidendalexecudveorden''(quotingFreedom From ReligionFound.,Inc.v.CJI/Y,433F.3d

989,997(7thCir.2006));and,

W HEREAS,theDepartmentofJusticeisnotanindependentagencyoftheExecutive

Branch;and,

W HEREAS,here,the''kial''isofaformerPresident,whic.hwasnotinidatedbythe

incllm bentPresident;and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 13 of 23
W HU EAS,theenforcem entofN ixon,418U.S.at7051 dW erentduetotheadvancem entoftechnology;and,

THEREFORE,PreventingtheUnitedStatesDeparlm entOfJusdcefrom gainingaccesstothem aterialPresidendalRecordsislaw ful,asw ellastheappoinM entofthespedalm aster,butthePresidentialRecordsareproperlyretum edtoPresidentTnlmpatthe

earliestconvenience;ifnot,atlemsta copy ofallrecords,asthe Plnindffm aintainshis

presllm pdon ofcorrecm esstm dlproven otherwise..

FURTHERMORE,thiskansacdoncottldextenttolocalgovernm ents,asetofDevolversofSovereigntp andinterferew1t1:localjurisdicdons'recordkeepingprae cesandthe

privilegesandimmlnidesoftheiragents,indudingwhenthosejtrisdictionsweredem arcated inanotherstate.

W HEREAS,Dkt.69at10-11equivocatesabouttheExecutiveB. ranch-generally with

themorespecificterminologiesofexecudvePrivilegesand/orImmllnidesappliedtothe

ExecutiveBrandwincum bent-presidentand ExecudveBranch-form er-president;and,

W HFREAS,D efendantisunpersuasively arguing,thatin addidon toitskespassto

a form er President's castle,its Governm entalllnit's needs are ofm ore nadonalim -

portanceth= thestatusquoestablished by theExecudveBranch-incllm bent-president,

w lzic.h doesnotdiscrim inateagairusttheExecudveBranch-form er-president-plaintiff,and

m adepublidyavailablethroughtheUnitedStatesDepartm entofState-officeoftheChief

ofProtocol(whethertheExecutiveBr= G -Gnlmbent-Attomey-Generz isastateactoror

a governmentalactor is irrelevantdue to the order ofprecedence and the Execudve

Branch-infalmbent-president'sestablishm entofthe nadonalsetnlrity agenda;nonetheless,thesedistinctionscannotbemuted),Egan,484U.S.at527;seealso,e.g.,M umhy,769

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 14 of 23
Fed.Appx.at792(''Theauthoritytoprotectnadonalseclrityinformadonfalsonthe

Presidentldirectlyl.vl,MDkt.69at134,./ofndexter,114U.S.at29O;and,

W HEREAS,thePresidentisan agent,in theterm softhePresidendalRecordsAct

and Federnliqt78;and,

W HAREAS,thecourtsm ustprotectthePresidentfrom aggression from unknow n

sourceswithin ExecutiveBranch,wltichconcurrentlypoliticallyansw ertovaryinginterests,Dkt.69at18quodngEgan,484U.S.at529;and,

W HRREAS,thecourtsm ustbesensitivetotheinter-w orkingsand inter-polidcsof

theexecudvebranch;

W IdEItEAS,hypothedcallp Execudve BrD G -G= bent-A/om ey-Generz-Doland-FBlcouldhavebeen denied accesstoPresidentialRecordsofExecudveBranch-form er-president-Trum pbyExecudveBrr G -G nlmbent-president-Biden;and,

W HLTREAS,therefore,thecllrrenthappeningsin thecase-at-hand areappeasem ent

tovitalpm'tsoftheGovernm entand possiblepolidcalpartiesand facdonsthePresident

mustappease,PHH Cotp.,839F.3dat1& 12-13(AstheSupremeCotrthasexplained,

ourConstitudon''wasadoptedtoenablethepeopletogovem themselves,throughtheir

Pofndexter,114U.S.at290(''lncommonspeechandcommonapprehensiontheyareusually

i

rehgardedasidentical;andasordinarilytheactsofthegovernmentare.theactsoftheState, becausewithirl

t. eIimitsofitsdelegationofpower,thegovernmentoftheStateisgeneralyconfoundedwiththeState

'tItself;andoftentheformerismeantwhentheIatlerismentioned.TheStateitselfisanidealoerson,# ïntangible ' 1

' , invisible,immutable.The governmentisan agent,and, withinthesphereoftheagency,q

iper'fectrepresentative;butoutsideofthat,itisaIawlessusurpation.TheConstitutionoftheStateisthj

iimitoftheauthorîtyofitsgovemment,andb0thgovernmentandStatearesubjec'ttothesupremacyof

theConstitutionoftheUnited States,and ofthe Iawsmadeinpursuancethereofa..Thisdistinction ises

sentialtotheideaofconstitutionalgovernment.TodenyitorblotitoutobliteratestheIineofdemarcatio

i

jthatseparatesconstitutionalgovernmentfrom absolutism,freeself-governmentbasedonthesovereign

'jofthepeoplefromthatdespotism,whetheroftheoneorthemany, whichenablestheagento.ftheStatl

ltpdçclareand. r/rzqçq-thathe.isth-e.s.tate;tos4y''Llétatc'estmof.'''')

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 15 of 23
elededleaders/'andtheConstitution''reqttiresthataPresidentchosenbytheentireNationoverseetheexecudonofthelaws.'')(quodngFrccEnterpriseFundv.Pub.Co.Acct.

OversightBd.,561U.S.477,499(2010):HelingsweAh,133S.@t.at2667(''Theyarefre

.e .ursuea.urelyiyYeolegiealeemm itmentle1heIaw'seenslitutienaltitywitheutthenee.

.e iake œegnizanee ofreseurœe eenslrainls,ehangesin publiceyinien (Iinëlu*ing .e1

aetering1he(i)r.liniensefseëialeuteasts,U.S.eenst.art.IV,j2& amen<.XIV,j1,eI.241

'k

er.etentialramifieat,J,ensferetherstateprieritiesl,l''(a..re.ri'atienthreu.ghgenemiesj)k

UnitedStatesv.Arthrex,Inc,No.19-1434*23,594U.S. (2021)(Robe/s,C.J.,TheConsdt-udonalhierarchyrequires''theexerdseofexecutivepower(toremainlaccotmtableto

thepeople.v);& Dkt.69at18quotingEgan,484U.S.at527(unauthorizedpersons);and,

W HEREAS,thereisruleoflaw,theCourtsmustprotecttl'teExecudveBranch-incllm bent-presidentand theExecudveBranch-form er-presidentfrom aggressions;and,

W HEREAS,thecurrentactsareagm essionsagainsttheUnitedStates,foundinsom e

W estem Hemisphere's-andSisterCommonLawjurisdicdons'-governmentalfaslnionfor

coupsdetat.

THEREFORE,theCourtshottldenterjudgementinfavorofPlaintif,whoisimmtme

from prosecudon bytheDefendant-e .Gonzalez.

W HFREAG,inaddidontoDkts.21,36,and60,thePolidcalQuesdonDof% ine,tmder

Bakerp.Carr,369U.S.186,217(1962)(atextually demonstrablecozksdtudonalcommitmentoftheissuetoacoordinatepoliticaldepartment);ard,

W HEREAR,pursuanttothePolidcalQuesdonDocfrinetheissueLsreservedforthe

PresidencydirecLly,fortheinterestofmaintniningPresidentialAutonomy(i.e.inanearlierdrafloftheDeclaradon ofIndependenceof1776,Thom asJefferson addressed the

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 16 of 23
Grievances againstthe Parliam ent,wltic.h he thoughtcaused the denialofthe Olive

Branch-freaty;but,'l'heKingwassti1givingpowertoParliament),compal'eOriginalDraft

(''weutterlydissolveallpolidcalconnecdonwlzichmayheretoforehavesubsistedbetveen usand thepeople orparliam entofGreatBritain:and finally w edo assertand

declarethesecoloniestobefreeandindependentstates,andthatasfreeandindependent

states,theyhavef=llpovvxertolevyw ar,concludepeace,conkactalliances,establishcom -

merce,andtodoa1otheractsandfbingswltic.hindependentstatesmayofrightdo.'')

withFinalDI.J.t;6and,

W HEREAS,Robert Yates,who refused to sign the United States Cozkstitution

thoughtthatthejudiciarywottldbeable''tomould''theroleofthepresidencp;and,

W HEREAS,''A umanexperienceteachesthatthosewhoexpectpublicdisseminadon oftheirrem arksm ay w elltem percandorwith a concern forappearancesand for

theirownintereststothedetrimentofthededsionmakingprocess...lalPresidentand

thosewhoassisthim m ustbefreetoexplorealternativesintheprocessofshapingpolides

and m aldng dedsionsand to do so in aw ay thatm any w ould beunwilling to express

exceptprivatelp ''Nixon,418U .S.at705& 7089and,

6. httpsi//teacle gamerico istov.org/doa ment/rough-& o -of-le-declrahon-of-Gdependence/.

7. https://w- .heritage.org/cou- /report/aginst-l'udidal-supremacy-tlze-fotmders-r d-ielimits-the-cotzrtsl'Ivety body ofmeninvestedw1f.14office/'Yatesobserved,''aretenadousofpower.''

Moreover,thisloveofpowerwould''influence''judges''toextendtheirpowertandincreasetheirrights,''

withtheresultthatthecourtsV IItendto''givesucham eaningtotheConsdtuhoninallcaseswhereitcan

possibly bedone,aswillenlargethe sphereoftheirauthoritpv...-fheend resultofal tltiswolzld bea

Suprem eCottrtwith powertortlethecountryinthemostimportantmattersaccordingtoitsownwilltonotonly exceeditsauthoritybuttousurp others'authority.''Thisy/t= E'ry''Yatessaid,''wilenable''19,

justicesoftheSupremeCourt''tomould1* governmentintoalmostanyslfl/?ctheyplease.''...Wa%esfurthercontendedthattheSupremeCourtwouldnotonlybesuprem eoverallothercourts,butthatitwould,infact

bethe suprem epowerin thegovernmenttobeceated by theConsdtudon.Thiss/zp-c-flag,Yatescontended,wouldfollowh'omtheCourt'sJltlzt?crofsetlingforaIlotherpoliticalfzcforsfhcauthoritativemeaningofthe

Constitution.'I'heSuprem eCouztheobserved,''hasthepower,inthelastresort todeterminea11questions

thatmayariseinthecourseoflegaldiscussion'onthemeaningandconstntdionoftheCorusdtudonrl.

17

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 17 of 23
WHEREAS,''lilndesigningthestructureofottrGovernmentanddividingandalocatingthesovereignpow ernm ongthreeco-equalbranches,theFram ersoftheCorkstitw

don soughttoprovideacom prehensivesystem ,butthescpflrcfepowerszpcrcnotintended

tooperatewithabsoluteindependences''Nfxo/z,433U.S.at442-3(quotingYoungstownSheet

& TubeCo.r.Sawyer,343U.S.579(1952)/and,

W I-IEREAG,theAttom ey Generalm ightbeappropriateifCongress'interestsw ere

violatedwiththePresidentialRecordsAct,butcf Id.,2U.S.C.jj192& 271-288n,& Andersonv.Dunn,19U.S.204(1821)(onlywhenCongress'interestsareviolated,theSegreant-at-M msdoestheenforcement;seegenerallyTitle2oftheUnitedStatesCodel;aqdx

. ''h-h..:=..a7x.I j . ;ati2 jk .t v; . zî -W. '-' ' ' 2 . '- - l''.';-:

'-'lEz-..,s'.-làif'-otc,IcE.;,:,.t.;hà.ïk--6.r5,:.'#,.,....''I.)'-l.

.:'-ë'1l-)(E!t-'k(--E,),.-tz.,!ir,ï!sri4#qE2..,.r-)(ù-Ez!n'(.E,,,f7,-(.:4:..,,'Jtf:-..(a:,--2.1-'('E.!t.-',-I-j.'').Jb-1..M.'/(8-.,!-4-r5pet5;(-L!r---.l,'s-.ëu'!s,.(,,:,-q2.!,.j4*

f/.-9$k3-j..'.:,G!c.'k.l.?ishF-r--.l.Ic:',i-d4ï1..,i-!-z!,:-:-1,;:.t.2'.la-ç;!.-.(E.-,r-l-kly'6(..yI.sl.i--rl,'tEtL,(i)kI-ï-jl..,ë,.!a!q,1c4?;:.;(!:Es2.h'v.,..l:.'.ëk!.s1hlt/.-.hk..d'-l.rlz'-juvtè.E.h,.-t.l.i,3-.lu:',t.!-;.u..-1-lqrs--1.!.k-r,-'-.1.:,'-i.--Bt1$.t'(-.E-!!1

-'-'i'$i1k-'-iit$#'.''i) ..(::1I;-j?I'; -12;..-..'.-1:j-qjt'.'',.(3.)hk/-(E.q,y-j;-,jr-l,r$-l,-k,4yE,;r:1jitrr-jql%krtlkrx)-.

-.lr-tri., !lP''-0-,efOïvtP*

r,1Q-:..Ayuë

3(-',R-.,'.!c

*

,..:+

laxOF.,W. .,S...,s

'

,O.

'

. -.--.

es,..-.9.-. ,..xmza-zof.,.-t.s<,-..-j,?y.(E.-,..(.:.-:.o).kp-'yt24,.j-J.,

q'.l3,(..;-E-!..jr..-k...h.-k,ss/rsë!,l.ïyj,/.-ë!,l.r.-.jkl.i.jlt-i-jy-rsl(:.:-jI.(j.1'cpj(a,'.z,.),L.j.3'kjïhp(,ë.i5k.)#.j.'Is/)b.u.t-,./-..?,.V.-..:.!-;4tl,s/rzk.h+r(j..r)?;..j's-4ytï/.gârà.t,-.frma-1si%j(:;Ejr!.i,(E-.jae;I).?k-ë..E...;x-h

.;..c.;.s ' .s xy

i'ju....(r:1.?jy;j/mFz'iEl'-:..(.:,.'i.,'t25::e.t.fc6.-....,<.;,76.a.?..v.t;..

.1x..E.-.j-b;uF.ï.ïi<.1*.7:'IJé.E1.,.t!..'!,-.*;.):.>'

..J..:l.,1

.

1:.-f#i:''é';lLx-ma ek.J.. ..k>'' .qjizsr?:ir ;.'&'ib<%'q.faîypk- 'r..gh&pjhrqjtj>.* ...$rk::1:1- . #':J,kvx Lvf.jéqs.zjhï/4t'.ixprjazxov .

''

-

-

.IErtill-

-.

''-

.

aR.'-

'

,M.

-.

-,,

.

.,--:t.7E.,.-;:.r, t7.

-

..h.

t. 'El,l1-'-,c'-

-

.,

u-,,

I

-'m.u,.:b.-'CElyl,-

lr'-tky,!h-1.-.

'

1.2-1::k..2.-P-t..I->te-..s.'-I'd,

-

..-:

e.-,-ni-..-.1..-.4-':.:-

-:,:-,,.1f,,'.,,t'i-%1--

h.'.y..e.-,!.p.2k,.l.L..-..--;-p....-Ir'-'11-..1;t--.E5,,..-sd-

-

-,F-:-

S-

-

-i.

it-a.-tu...-d(Ei2,...-..-

s. .w

l.st-l;'-t'r.El,.,1-'..1jk,d-:i!!,hx-gip-'1t-:..f;I-r'ç'.I.e.-nq,.,-d-..

-.-,L.-,,,-4:-:k.

.:.2.'-f'-

.-..t.-

'

.h-,-d.:E,,...,,

Jj- .l-v<',..+. . --'.A.'.kt.. ..'.. zyvi ' tGq. ''er!,o u 7 . '. ' .. . 's ...kwsv,.t ..k-.1:.

.1-,1S

e.'1.$-p,rrr'';'.tE.!.?-h-a.

.l.

-..I:-:':',këE;5!,lk'.d.e-r...

.

-

1.:1-1.1..-9;:--.

.

1-lq..71

'-1:.

IE,,I''.e-s-.:.t. .,;.-.t..x

'l'-t-s

ex1--1.---,lr-1--,k---,1,,:4,:-:21$1-,1-.-:E,,'.t.-.E.-;7;.e.sv.e.

v.r.,.e;.1.-.64-21.tm..-,.,-4.::..2.'1î.

...CE5t.-..1.i(E-':,h.9. dE-l,.

lr-,-

'

,-.

'E51-'I:.

'1-..1..'1-.kE5t,-

-1-..--

v.

e-,.1.-.t.s,.-,,,:,i-2'--lk-'t.-

.tE5;-,--.

d:El,-iE5t.-,ç,:'.:-.

.2-I-'-,,t...a-.

#-s.-.?

'.4:'-:2,

,

-

,.

,,bk''-

--

-

. -, .l. . . ' .. a- 7 ' .. . ' 'C ' - 2* -. . ' '''' m0, .:.

Ie'.v..'t-'re.gq.

t..-l#.

-9*--*-rà1:-.71,.$.

%-:sO.

-

..A?f.

IrL::e1.-.k:

-j,a'$;oe. u-j,,4,.+n.z;-71-).1-.:

!

-*-d-- -s-'7t,-,a...t.e.s:/--H,Jà.-'J':,J..k,'I,,f.,'n-b.

-J-o-s...-wt-,..-er-ç.s/-4-l.-h.,...,f)r,1..-j..3.-ïtk-3L,-%,.s,-.S.s.-:4:,-.#rtC,;*-s.y1'iqtzqkya-,,g1;,kp.-2.,sI.;,6..s*-,6--b,-5.... &:s,r..2--7J!-,6.-*:.,-7.,..j/.b4-...

.

.?.-..1

THBREFORE,theCom tshotldenterjudgement,underFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2)or

(b)(6),infavorofPlaintiff,whoisimmunefrom prosecudonbytheDefendant-W .Gonzalez,and advisethatprosecution ism ostproperfrom theincumbentPresidenthim self

orhishonor'scouznselor,Le.CounselortoIlaePresident(M .r.SteveRicchet:,J.D.),butnot

theAttorneyGeneral(TheHon.MerrickGarlartd,J.D.). 1ï-?.:g#.-.'.iz'Llt..S'E'/67. WltiteHouseGenefal

Cotmselor(Mn SmartF.Delerp J.D.).InreLindsey,158F.3dat1280-2(WltiteHouse

GeneralCounseltmderthecommandoftheincumbentPresidentv.DOJ).Hblihù.O tï/thy

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 18 of 23
133!.@t.ai274/:4-15-)$.373(ffrqinqt.(9PM inenqeJeurnalCe.,48% *.S.at7t4#)yFederalist78.Maine@m/#<.'/J1ea/îh@Dp.iens,14r(9S.@t.at1334(A'lkite,J.,:issenèing)(/lsMead ef

,14ashimzten,*.C.sl-i.t)sïtiful,td yireetitsnatlStatean: Gevernm ent,an erylnaryfMederaleem- . . . .. . -

: w ;.tyenIaw r'ùltlitepl.AIIdocum entsshouldberetum edtoPlaintiff.

IN'1TIEALTERNATIW ,thecourtmaydismissunderFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(7).

IN 'rflEALTERNATIVE,since theDefendant'sactsaretm cortsdtutionaland cannot

beratifiedtobecom ecorusdtudonal,asDefendantom ittedtheinfulm bentPresident-H ead

ofStateand-l-lead ofGovernm entagainsttheinclzmbentPresident'sow nOrderforProtocol,thecourtm ay dism issand rulein favorofPlaintifffortheDefendant'sunclean

hands.

IN THEALTERNATIVE,thecourtm ayissuean Ofderto Show CausetotheDefendantfor1aw enforcementjurksdiction.

ATAI.LcosTs,fhisCotu'tshould avoid creatingaslipperyslopesothattheintalm -

bentPresidentwilbesubjed toarrestbytheincxzmbentAttorneyGeneral,who,but,

servesatthehonor'spleasure,orcreatean unconsdtudonalautonomy ofexecudvedeParhnents,wltit:hwillnotbeaccountabletothePeople,-or,sometimes,totheirvarying

intexests-theepitom eofexecudvetyranny.

''(AJprose(modon),howeverinaefullypleaded,mustbeheldtolessstringent

standardsth= form alpleadingsdraftedby lawyers.''Erickson v.Pardus,551U .S.89,94

(2007).

Iusem yConsdtudonalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknow ingfrom m yundermaduateand1aw school,jurisdodorcandidacp educadorts,andpolidcalofficesand

from readinglaw outsideofform alschoolingforthew ritinganddiscussions,atp lm ents,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 19 of 23
andmosonsofthesef'llings,seeokt.21at5&20andsupra,prA'(signaturelinel./.4-.@/

linsswenb,13:s.cik-at2667& 247:-71('zuni.uelegalstaAusz')

Im eveferIeayp tefilelhisllqidr: am en<e: Ibl:t.87

lm ovetoreinstatem yM odon (9(e nlinueW i;,(')utPre-pa ','. Filie. Fee atDkt.

#te avei: yefaultplpelinterestehargesenelherm enetaryœemm ilments

Re ecthlllysubm itted,

/s/Raj .Patel

T.E.,T. RajK.Patel(prosc)

6850East21stStreet

lndianapolis,IN 46219

M arionCotm ty

317-450-6651(ce1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

J.D.Candidate,NokeDnmeL.Sch.2015-2017

President/smdentBodyPresident,StudentGov'tAss'nof

EmoryU.,Inc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

StudentBodyPresident,BrownsbtuyCmty.Sch.

Corp./president,Browm burg1-11g,1:SduStudentGov't

2009-2010(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.from theN okeD am eL.Sch.StudentB.Ass'n tothe

lnd.St.B.Ass'n 2017

DeputyRegionalDirector,Yotm gDem ocratsofAm .-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Fotm der& ViceChair,Ind.High Sch.Dem ocrats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.tlndep.l,OxfordC.Republicansof

Em oryU .,Inc.2011-2012

C*lerk's04J'i'cerc.fwinfàJ:.t.:''s:iesaulfJz'êom'.zf'ilrhv'.i.',JfkI.f...bf.t-.*z'n,'.f;:'ITul,,JW.e-ntbi, amendmen'tsu

20

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 20 of 23
CERTV ICATEOF SERYICE

1certifythatIservedacopyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)I'hirdAmendedDkt.

87on10/3/2022tobelow individualsviathee-m ail:

JamesM .Trusty

IFRAH,PLLC

1717PennsylvaniaAve,N W ,Suite650

W ashington,DC20006

202-852-5669

Email:jta'ustytêifrm aw.com

LindseyH alligan

511SE 51 Avenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

720-435-2870

Em ail:lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

ChristopherM ichaelKise

ChrisKise& Assodates,P.A.

201EastParkAve.Ste,51 Floor

Tallahassee,FL 32301

(850)270-0566

chris@ckise.net

M .Evan C orcoran

Silverm an,'rhom pson,Slutkin,& W laite,

LLC

400EastPrattSkeet,Suite900

Ballim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

ecorcorm @silverm r thom pson.com

JuanAntonioGonzalez

UN ITED STATESAW OIG EY

99NE 41 Street,81 Floor

M inm i,Fl33132

Telephone:(305)961-9001

Emo :ju> .r toOo.gor alezA sdoj.gov

Jay1.Bratt,Chief

Counterintelligence& ExportControl

SedionN at'lSecllrityDiv.

950PennqylvaniaAvenue,N W

W ashington,D .C.20530

(202)233-0986

jay.brattz@usdoj.gov

PresidentJoeBiden

c/oM arinaM .Kozmycz,AssodateGen.

Cotm sel

TheE.O.P.attheW hiteHouse

1600PennsylvaniaAvenueNW

W ashington,D.C.20500

Phone:202-457-1414

IREDACTEDI

Dated:October3,2022

Res edfuzysubnù/ed,

s/ jPatel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(ProSe4

6850East21stSkeet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion County

317-450-6651(ce1)

rajpzolo@pnail.com

www.rajpatel.live

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 21 of 23
@

IN THEUM TED STATESDISTRICTCOURTFORTHE

SOW H ERN DISD ICT O7'PLOIID A

DONM D J.TRUM P,

Plaintiv

UN ITED STATES OF AM ERICA ,

D efendant

N o.9:22-cv-81294-AM C

ORDKR

rlyismatterCOAO S NOW beforethcCourton àlr.RajK.Patel'sRcsponses,

alongwithMz.Patel'sNoticeunder18U.S.C.j2382,andthefollowingisORDERED:

E1Mr.Patel'sM otionforlnten-entionisE''x ED.

(1TheInterventionisoneofrightunderFed.R.Civ.P.24(a).

(1ThelnterventionispcrmissiveundcrFed.R.Civ.P.24(b).

E1M r.Patel'sM otion for LeavetoProceed W ithoutPre-payingFilingsFeesis

GRANTED.

E1ThecomplaintisDIRMTSSED under

(1Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2).

()Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6).

E1Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(7).

E1Unclean HandsDoctrine.

E1PoliticalQuestionDoctrine.

E1Thedismissalofthecomplaintis

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 22 of 23
(1W ITHOUTPREJUDICE.

(Jm TH PREJUDICE.

E1AllseizeddocumentsandotherpropertyisORDERED to

E1RemainwiththecoM ,or

(1BereturnedtothePlaintif,M r.DonaldJ.Trump.

(1After the previous happenings, then now, M r. Patel's intervention is

DISKESSED VJ TH OW PREJIJDICE.

DONE AN 13 ORDERED in chambers at FortPierce,Florida,this day of

2022

H ON .ATT,EEN M .CAN NON

U nitedStatesD istrictJudge

Distribution toallattorncysandproselitigantsofrecord.

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 23 of 23