rILED By ' o c !

Ix THEuxrrEo STATESolsTRlcT coult'rFoR TH E ' '

sou Tlu ltx o lsTRlcT o r FLO RID A

w Es'rPA LM BEA CH o rw slo x t<-..

'0.. C !2.2222

DONALD J.XXI.* ,

Plaint# No.9:22-cv-81294-AMC

D ated:Od ober3,2022

U N ITED STA TESOF AM ERICA,

JURYTIUALDEG NDED

Defendant

C

A

L

N

E

G

R

E

K

L

U

A

.S

E. NOBLE 1.

S . DIST.CT. : .D.OFFLAT-W,RB. ?.

jg ok-h2çjKtk.ow#--yq

..m m y

M OVANT-INTERVEN OR (PRO SEI-RAIK.PATEL'S

TH IRD A M EN D ED D K T.87

1,T.E.,T.ERAJK.PATEL,thetmdersigned m ovK tdntervenorprosc,in theabovenamedcase,* 114apendingm odon atDkt.36,hereby submittltisthird am ended reply

toDefendant-united StatesofAm erica'sResponseaiDkt.48,which isw ritlen tobean

addihontoDkt.60(duplicatefilingatDkt.61),orasmyresporksetoDefendant'sM otion

atDkt.69.L.R.7.1(c)(2)(10pages,frontandback).Amendments.SecondAmendments.

ThirdAmendments.

W lvltM s,''AttorneyGeneralBrewsterexplainedmoret14% acent'uryago,'ltlhere

aretwokindsofoffidalterm s'...onekindof'term'refersioaperiodofpersonalservice.

In thatcase,'theterm isappurtenantto theperson'...Anotherldnd of'term 'refersio

afixedslotoftimetowlnic.hindividualappointeesareassigned...-fhere,'tlaepersonisappurtenanttothete1'm '...ln otherw ords,a'term ofoffice'caneitlaernm w1t1atheperson

orwiththecalendar,''UnitedStatesv.W ilson,290F.3d347,353(D.C.

1

Cir.2002 uoting

GVI-LENK? >

*% 6+

Q* . ' +

%

s . rn

tx

r. c' -- > -

.tp ' % s>z '

% >+

* ,

a.f.: -,

arzjv.t' 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 1 of 22
CommbsoftheDïsf.ofColumbia,17Op.Att'yGen.476,476-79(1882)/Hol/fngswo/hv.

Perry,570U.S.693,723,133S.Ct2652,2672(2013);and,

W l-œlM s,thePresidendalRecordsAd,44U.S.C.jj2201-2209,makestheformer

PresidentapartoftheExecudveBranclu and m orespedfically thePresidencp W ilson,

290F.3d at353& Federalist78;and,

W lc llM s,execudvepdvilege''safeguardsthepublicinierestincandid,confidentialdeliberadonswithintheExecudveBranda;itis'hm damentaltotheoperationofGovernment/''Trumpp.MazarsU.S.,LLP,140S.Ct.2019,2032(U.S.2020/and,

W lvltM s,21Presidentialdata''lislpresumpdvelyprivileged/'Nixonr.Sirica,487

F.2d700,716(D.C.Cir.1973)9and,

W HERF-AS,f'informadonsubjed toexecudvePdvilegedeserves'thegreatestprotedionconsistentw1t.14thefairaclministradonofjusdce/''M clrs,140S.Ct.at2024(quotingUnitedStatesv.Nixon,418U.S.683,715(1974):and,

W HEREAS,''EtlhehighrespectthatisowedtotheofficeoftheChiefExecudve...is

amatterthatshould inform thecondud oftheendreproceeding/'Clintonv.Jones,520

U.S.681,705,117S.Ct.1636,1650-51(1997),andthatthereisatradidonoffederalcourts'

affording ''the ui-mostdeference to Presidenhalresponsibiliies Clinton,117 S.Ct.at

16527'InreLindsq,158F.3d1263,1280(D.C.

. Cir.1998)(tquodngNixon,418U.S.at710-

11)(internalquotadonmarksomittedl);and,

W HEItEA& ''Etlheauthoritytoprotectnadonalsecurity informadon fallson the

Presidentz''Dcp'foftheNcz.l/p.Egan,484U.S.518,527(1988),seealso,e.g.,Mllrp/lyv.Sec'y,

U.S.Dcp'fofdrpzp,769Fed.Appx.779,792(111 Cir.2019),& Dki.69at13;and,

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 2 of 22
W HEREAS,forpurposesofPresidendalRecordsAd,theincumbentPresidentwho

t'rarksitionstoform erPresidentpisan ''agent''ofthepepple,Egan,484U .S.at529,Federalist78,& Dki.69at18;and,

W lc llM s,theSupremeCoprthasem phasizedthatpdvilegedaim s,''mustbeconsideredinlightofourltistoriccommi% enttotheruleoflaw''and''ltqheneedtodevelop

allrelevantfadsintheadversarysystem ,''Nixon,418U.S.at708-09& Dkt.69at9)and,

W HEREAS,''liln theperformance ofassigned consdtudonalduties,(Execudve

brancltloftheGovernmentmustinitialyinterprettheConsdtudonzand...'1'hePresident'scouzksel,aswehavenoted,readstheConsdtudonasprovidingan absoluteprivilegeofconfidentiality fora11Presidendalcom mllnicadors/'Nixon,418U.S.at703-4,28

U.S.C,j516,Uargasv.Unfted States,114Fed.CI.226,236 (2014)(''Thegovernment's

relianceon28U.S.C.j516ismisplaced.l'l;& seegeneralyDavidA.Strauss,''Presidenial

tnterpretalionoftheConsdtudon/'15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-135(1993)19and,

W HEREAS,in otherwords,''executivebranchm ustinterprettheConsdtution beforeitcandeddewhattodo/'seegenerallyStrauss,15CardozoL.Rev.at113-1359and,

WI.IEIkEAS,theSupremeCourthas''rejectledltheargumentthatonlyanincumbent

Presidentmayassert''separation-of-powersdaims,Nixonv.Adm'rofGen.Setws.,433U.5.

425,439(1977/and,

W l-muM s,thereisanihternakhorizontalandvertical,separaiionofpowersoninterpretingtheCortsdtudonwitltintheExecudveBranch;and,

1.DavidA.Strauss,''PresidentiallnterpretationoftheConstiiudon/'15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-

135 (1993), https://chicagounbound.uchicaaro.edu/coai/viewcontent.coai?referer=&htpsredk=l&u icle-x3Oo6dzcontextujournalarticlespresideniial.

3

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 3 of 22
W HEREAS,privilegeand im mllnidesm aybeusedtosustain separationofpow ers

irksidebranchesofgovernm entand acrossgovernm entsundertheUnitedStatesConsdtudon;and,

W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDeparM entofStateisresponsibleforinterpretingand

elaboratingonthePrivilegesandlmmttniuesClause,U.S.const.art.lV,j29

W HEItEAS,theurtitedStatesDepatm entofStateshow sitselaborationonthe PrivilegesandIm mllnidesG ausein theUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedenceby theOfficeof

theChiefofProtocol,https://www.state.gov/w -content/tlploads/2022/02/UnitedStates-order-of-precedencoFebm aU -zozz.pdf(revisedFeb.11,2022)& U.S.corksi.art.

lV,529and,

W IVItEAS,theUnitedStatesDepartmentofJusdce,theAttorneyGeneral,oxU.S.

AttomeyJuanGonzales,didnotfollow theUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedencedulyestablishedbytheOfficeoftheChiefofProtocol,Id.;and,

W HEREAS,theincum bentPresidentoftheUnitedStateshassupportedtheUnited

StatesOrderofPrecedencehousedbytheUnitedStatesDepar% entofStateOfficeofthe

CltiefofProtocol,which showsthatformerPresidentTrump outrankqincllmbentAttorneyGeneralMerrickGarland,Id.& 3U.S.C.% 301efseq.,and Holingsworth,133S.Ct.

at2673-74(proponents''arenotelected''and ''decideforthemselves,withnoreview,

whatargumentsto makeand how tomakethem''indefenseoftheenacted initiativez...

thosesamechargescould be Ieveled withequalifnotgreaterforceatthespecialprosecutorsjustdiscussed''l;and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 4 of 22
W HEREAS,tlms,theUnited StaiesDepar% entofStateandtheUnitedStatesDepadmentofJusdceareadversariesinoursystem ofrtleoflaw,inordertocreateaseparationofpowersandchecksandbalance,butchDoctrineofComity,U.S.const.art.lV,9

2,& 28U.S.C.j516;and,

W HEItEAS,theincum bentPresidentoftheUnited Stateshasnotdeared,norm ay

ratifytmconsdtutionalactstomakethem constitudonal/breadaofprotocol;and,

W HEREAS,theexecudveDeparM entsanditsHeadshavebeencreated,byanAct

ofCongress,and appointedbythePxesident,with adviceandconsentfrom theSenate,

Freytag'fJ.Comm't.,501U.S.868,886,917(1991)(discussingHeadsandprindpaloficers

oftlaeexecudvedepar% ents);and,

Wl-œltEAs,theExecudveBranch's''inierpretadonofits(own)powers...isduegreat

respectfrom theothers,''Nixon,418U .S.at703-49and,

W HEREAS,formerPresidentsretain''actualauthoriW''tobindtheGovernmentof

1he United Statesto contractualobligationsnecessary to carryoutthe dutiesoftheir

unique iegaloffices,including inCongress'United StatesCoul ofFederalClaims,The

TuckerAct,28U.S.C.jj1346(a)&1491,Scbism v.OnftedStates,316 F.3d 1259,1304-

2.Underthecommonlaw,theincumbentKingmaychangeprotocolat-willagainstaformerHead

ofStateoraprecedingMonarch;thosevestedpowersareembeddedintheUrtitedStatesConstitutbnand

remainconstantuntillawfullyamended.Besides,asthecomplaintandAttom eyGeneral'sM eaickGa1=

land'spublic,apolitical,andlegalcommentsshow,currentlp onlyaunitofanExecutivebranchhasacted,

Le.theDepartmentofJustice-F.B.l.,ratherthantheExecutivebranchaswhole.Dkt.1at10.Tonosurprise,

evenaqainstaformerpresident,inordertolegallyconditionthepeacefultransitionofpower,theExecutive

powerlsmuchweakerth% ofacommon1aw K'lng's.UnitedStatesv-vprovidenceIournalCo.,485 % 693r

701(1988)(morethanone''unitedstates''is''startlingv).Vainei-jmty.pealtböpt/onsv.ùni statesi'

i.ibb.èt--i-b.-tà.,-i-.-b>-k-A(---Ik.s-)v.#.-i.s.-e-pl-irs.).(.(nye-rn..-a.f..è.t.a-ti.-ons.-or.p-tu-e..d..)--(.-.f-e..d..-e..r-,.l..c.-0.. n-law-.''-...s. . .iqu. ,

,'

ki-nmo-t..em-xr.e- s-.ts-'l-'i.. .

5

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 5 of 22
06(Fed.Cir.2002),seesupra,p.15n.5,andbutcfHo/lfngswo/h,133S.Ct.at2667,.

and,

W HEREAS,''(all1powersof1aw enforcement...areassignedtmderourCortsiituiion

totlaeExecudveandtheJudidarp''Quinnr.UnitedStates,349U.S.155,161(1955).

THBREFORE,onlyaunitofiheExecutiveBrancluthecurrentAttorneyGeneral,has

broughtchargesagainstform erPresidentTrllm pinvioladonoftheinter-workingsofthe

execudvebranchprotocol,orderedbytheincumbentPresidentBiden,ashousedbyPresidentBiden'ssubordinates,who arealsoeithertheAtlom ey General'ssuperiorsorcoequalsonthesubjed-matter,intheUnitedStatesDepar% entofState.

FURTHERMORE,thePresident,theCourts,ortheExectldveBranchcannotm utedistlnctionsofoffice,person,state,andgovernm ent,astheyareanelaboradonoftheUnited

StatesCorksdmtion PrivilegesandTm m lm itiesClause,which laysoutthestructureand

lanesofeN orcement.Pofndererv.Greenhow,114U.S.270,290(1884)(''thedistinction

betweenthe governmentofaStateand the State itselfisimportant,and gshalllbe observed.'')(underlîneadded).

W HEREAS,inorderforafederaldistrictcourtoflaw tohavepersonaljurisdidion,

underFed.R.Civ.12(b)(2),tradidonalnotiorksof''nat-uraljusdce/'''fairplap''and''substandaljusdce''mustata1dmenotbeviolated,McDonaldv.Mabee,243U.5.90,92(1917),

JointAnti-FascistComm.v.M cGrath,341U.S.123,123(1951),Breithauptv.Abram,352U.S,

432,435(1957)(shocktheconscience,traditionalnodonsoffairplayanddecencp indida

ofnotapeacefultrarksidonofpowercausedbyDefendant-Dolisavioladonoftheconsdence),Gonzalesv.UnitedStates,348U.S.407,412(1955)(''tmderlyingconceptsofproceduralregulal-ityandbasicfairp1ay'),Int'1ShoeCo.v.W ashington,326U.S.310,324&

6

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 6 of 22
326(1945),UnitedStates'p.Lovasco,431U.S.783,796(1977)(dueprocessembodies''flmdamentalconceptionsofjustice''and''thecommunitfsserkseoffairplayanddecency'')

LseeFederalist77,UnitedSiatesasacommtmity),Cnty.ofSacramentov.Lewis,523U.S.

833,847(1998)(consdence-shockingbehavioris''so'brutal'and'offensive'thatit(does)

notcomportwithtradidonalideasoffairplayanddecency./')(abuseofexecudvepower)

(decendesof''dvilized conduci,''epiiomizedinU.S.const.art.IV,92)(bowingand

curtsyamongstandtostateactorsortheeffectinourcommunitylz& Sessionsv.Df/nfl.yfl,

138S.Ct.1204,1212(2018)(reqtliredbyboth''ordinarynotiortsoffairplayandthesettled

rulesof1aw.'');and,

WHEREAS,traditionalnodonsofnaturaljusticestatesaformerT.H.(T.E.)Presideni

oftheUnitedStates(T.E.PresidentoftheUnitedStatesforaldocumentsforeignaffairs),

from theNaturalState,ismorefitthanthecurrentcourt(judgeandDefendant)andthe

NaturalOrderdem andsthattheincum bentAttorneyGeneralyieldtopressingcharges

againstPlaintiff,ourform erHeadofState,sccUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedenc&united

StatesDep'tofState-officeoftheChiefofProtocol,U.S.corkst.art.lV,j2,& Dkt.60at2,

5,5n.3,& 7;and,

W HEREAS,traditionalnotiortsofbasicfairplayandsubstandaljusdcehavebeen

violated,seee.g.Obergefellv.Hodges,576U.S.644,742(2015)(harshtrea% entisnotfair

play)(gaysandlesbia havebeendeniedtheNamralOrder,pursuanttotheirachievem entsindvilsodetp asthewealthiestcom m unity,pardcularlp gaym en,intheUnited

Siates;thesam eillnesshasentered stateand governm entalinsdttttions,prevendngthe

7

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 7 of 22
Nam ralOrder,includingingovenningiheDefendant'sdedsions)(Plaindffhasbeendetzied rightfulplacein the afterm ath ofhishonor'sinnlmbency asPresidentofUnited

Statesp& Pet.forW ritofCed.*58-9,Patelv.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202- );and,

W l-mllM s,even witltexplidtinformed corksentthePlaindffcannotavailltim self

beforetltiscourtbecauseltisavailm entcannotovercomethevioladontradidonalnotiorks

offairplapnaturaljusdce,andsubstandaljusdceasappliedtothecou/andanypossible

rulingbythiscourt,U.S.corkst.art.lV,j2& seealsoUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedenceUnitedStatesDep'tofState-officeoftheCltiefofProtocol;and,

Wl-mlM s,tltiscourtcannotattachpersonaljudsdictiontothePlaindffasitwould

violatethet'radidonalnodonsoffairplay,naturaljusdce,and substandaljusdce,and,

thus,itsopinionwottldonlybeadvisory;and,

W HEREAS,inaddidon,thecorollarytoPlaindff'sformerPresidendalprivilege, im -

mtmitp isthecourt'slimitedjudidalreview,Federalist78,U.S.const.art.W ,j2,art.III

(originalintent),& amend.V.Marbury'p.M adison,5U.S.137(1803).

THEREFORE,thisCotzrtshould dismisssuaspontetm derFed. R.Civ.P.12(b)(2),as

theCoul doesnothavepersonaljurisdidionforPlaindff,orFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6),for

failuretostateadaim uponwhichreliefcanbegranted,asthereisnoenforcem entm echanism torequirethePlaindff,theform erHeadofStateandform erPresident, whoisalso

Pdvileged,pertheNaturalState,andisImm tm e,pertheNaturalStatetoo;thedefidendescan onlybecured by new chargesbroughtdirectlyby iheincum bentPresident,by

ltisown cotmselor,ratherth= theincumbentAttorneyGeneral.

FURTHERMORE,thenodonsofnaturaljusdce,fairplay,andsubstandaljustkebuttresscastledoctrine,asgenerallyapplied,andPlaintiff'scastlecanuniquelp alongwith

3.h% sr//hrc-prod-requests.o-u-westsz.amazoniws.com/Wage-Gap-Appendix.pdf.

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 8 of 22
thepastPresidents,can withstand allforcesexceptthose directly and consdtutionally

m mm andedbytheincllmbentPresident,e.g.UnitedStatesSecretServiceorunitedStates

ArmedandSpaceForce.SeeDkt.60at2,5,5n.3,& 7.Thisisalso becausedueprocess

cannotoverride a PrivilegeorImmunity,and substantive due processisconsiderateof

Privilegesand Imm unities,perthe Federalistand Anti-Federalistcontractofthe Biilof

Rights,and the interestofthe Foundersand Amendersto preserve the culture ofour

Nation.U.S.const.art lV,j2& amend.XIV,j2,cl.1,'Lovasco,431U.S.at796,.Federalist80(''ltmaybeesteemedthebasisoftheUnion,that''thecitizensofeachStateshal

beentitled to aIItFe privilegesand imm unitiesofcitizensofthe severalStates.''And if

itbeajustprinciplethateverygovernmentOUGHTTO POSSESSTHEMEANSOFEXECUTING lTSOW N PROVISIONSBY ITSOW N AUTHORITK'');Pet.forW ritofCert *

58-9,Patelv.UnftedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202- );& compareU.S.const.art.lV,jj

1-29wfthU.S.const.art.VI,j1referringtoArticlesofConfederation(1781),art.IV,paras.

1& 3(''Thebettertosecureandperpetuatemutualfriendshipand intercourseamong

thepeopleofthedifferentStatesinthisUnion(i.e.,DoctrineofComityinU.S.const.art.

lV,j2),thefreeinhabitantsofeachoftheseStates,paupers,vagabonds,andfugitives

fromjusticeexcepted,shalbeentitledtoaIprivilegesandimmunitiesoffreecitizensin

the severalStatesi...provided alsothatno im position,dutiesorrestrictionshallbe Iaid

byanyState,onthe propertyoftheUnited States,oreitherofthem.''//''FuIIfaithand

creditshalbegivenineachoftheseStatestotherecords,acts,andjudicialproceedings

9

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 9 of 22
ofthecouosandmagistratesofeveryotherState.'')(lz'magistrates''replacedwith''citizen'')(seeDkt.21at13)(seea/so Pate/v.Unfted States,No.1:21-cv-020O4-m S (Fed.

CI.202- ),Dld.1at9-10n.6/.

UNDERFED.R.CIV.P.24,Ihaveacomm onquestionof1aw orfactorinterestinthe

t'ransactionbecauseafavorablerulingtotheDefendanicanviolatem yExcellendes,the

style/dtles,and my careerand statesmartsbip byextertsion ofihisruling amongstlicensed Governm entalactors,local,statezfederal,andinternationalzwho mightsym pathizew1:11tltisCourl'sunconstitutionality.

W HEREA& theSupremeCoud hasheld thataform erPresidenimaynoisuccessfully assertexecudveprivilegeagainstreview by ''thevery ExecutiveBranch in whose

nam etheprivilegeisinvoked/'Nixon,433U.S.at447-48& Dkt69at8;4and,

W HEREAS,executivePdvilegeandexecutiveImm llnityarecorolaries,butdisdnd

concepts,U.S.const.art.lV,j2& amend.M V,j1,d.2;and,

W HEREAS,asserdngonenecessadlyim putestheasserdon oftheother,Id.;and,

W HEREAS,formerUnitedStatesPresidentTrllm p m ayassertexecudvelm muniiy

from United StatesGovernm ehtalforcewltichisnottmderthecomm and oftheincum -

bentU nited StaiesPresident,Id.;and,

W ldElEAs,inthehappeningsrelatedtoNixon,433U.5.at425,incum bentPresideni

GeraldFordwasirdmatelyitwolvedinprosecutingformerPresidentNixon,Id.&cf.Dkt.

1at10;and,

4.AnF.B.I.cannotclaim executivePrivilegeagainsttheincumbentAttorneyGeneral,butaformer

Presidentcanclaim executivePrivilege(i.e.PresidentialPrivilege)againsttheincumbentAtorneyGeneral..

Respectively,theindependentconceptofexecutivelmmunityapp-lbes,whichfavorstheformerPresident

agnlnsttheGlncumbentAttorneyGeneral.

10

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 10 of 22
W HEREAS,here,asunlikein thehappeningsrelatedtoNixon,433U.S.at425,the

lncum bentPresidentisnotindmately involved againstthe prosecudon ofPresident

Biden,PHH C/rp.v.Cbns7zptcrFinancialProtectionBureau,839F.3d1,12-13(D.C.Cir.2016)

(M adisonianpresidentialcontrol),seeMorganv.UnitedStates,304U.S.1,2-2(1938)(holdingthatitis''nottheftmcdonofthecourttoprobethementalprocessesoftheExecudve)''),andDkt.1at10;and,

W HEREAS,here,thetopicsofdocumentsare related to foreign policp tmlikein

Nixon,433U .5.at425,where,tltedocttmentswererelatedtodomesdcpolicy;and,

W I-IEItEAS,morespecificalyandmaterialp aformerPresident/HeadofStateoutrankstheincumbentAttorney Generalinforeignreladonsanddiplom aticm atter,wltich

areexdusivelyreserved forthePresident'srecognition,seegerlcri/yProvidenceJournal,

485U.S.at701(moret14% one'X nitedStates''is''startlingv);and,

W HEREAS,theincllmbentPresident,theUnited StatesOrderofPrecedencedtlly

establishedbytheOfficeoftheCltiefofProtocol,andthePresidendalRecordsActshow

thattheformerpresidentscarry on offidalduties,wltic.h com ew ith om nipresentpdvilegesand imm tmiues,which are absolute exceptatagaizustan incum bentPresident,

Nixon,418U.S.at703-4& Scheuerv.Rhodes,416U.S.232,23% 241,244,& 248,(1974/and,

W HEREAS,theCortsdtutionalpowerofexecudvePrivilegeand/orexecudveImmllnityofaform erPresident,thus,m ay belawfully assertedagainsttheincumbentDepalmentofJustice,U.S.cozust.art.IV,j2& nmend.M V,j1,d.2,Murrayv.Bush,No.

06-C-0781*1(E.D.W is.Aug.31,2006)(''whethertheadionisfrivolousormalidous,or

seelera/ïd/#tpzanimmuneplrfy,orfailstostateadaim onwhichreliefmaybegranted./')

(italicsadded)(internaldtadonsomitted);cf.28U.S.C.51915(e)(2)(B)(ii);Williamsv.

Holmes,No.1:17-c'v-00799-KOB*1(N.D.Ala.Sep.5,2017/Malcqlmv.Cif.yofM iami,No.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 11 of 22
22-ch,-20499-1C(NG/DAMIAN *2,4,&6(S.D.Fla.Mar.7,2022))&Listerr.Dep'tofTrcasuty,408F.3d1309(101 Cir.2005);and,

W I-IEREAS,thePlaintiffcanlawfttllypossessthedisputedUnitedStatesrecords,44

U.S.C.52202;and,

W ivIkEAS,theFed.R.Civ.P.8(c)(1)alow fortheaffirmadvedeferksesofillegality

(Defendant'splayinobtainingPresidendalRecords),license(U.S.corkst.art.IV,j2),

laches(Defendantshouldhaveactedqttickeriftrtlysuspidousofnadonalsectlrity),or

undeanhands(DefendantshouldhaveinvolvedtheincumbentPxesidentoftheUnited

states);and,

W lv- s,tltisCourtisin Com ityw1t14bothPlaindffand Defendant,andhasthe

privilegeofsetvingeachpartyinhis/her/theirindividualcapadtp DodrineofComitp

U.S.const.art.W 'j2.

THEREFORE,ihePlaindffisim m tmefrom prosecutionfrom theDefendant,andihe

Courtshotlld retum allrecordstoplaindff,PresidentTnlm p,andorderchargesagainst

TheHonorableGarlandforconversion,''treason''/''war''p''attackz''andrebellionorinsurreciion.U.S.const.al't.HI,j3918U.S.C.923819& P'rovidenceJournal,485U.S.at701.

FURTHERMORB,undertheConstitudonalficdon,whichstads,ataminim um,with

thecorporatecharjersmendoned in theDedaradon oftndependence(1776),thelocal,

excellentcorporadonsand otherlocalauthoritieshavedevolved powerto the Federal

Sovereiga muchm oreth= theSisterStateshavetotheFederalSovereign;thus,thein-

#

terestin thet'ransaction isacheck on theDevolved Sovereigntp Faithfully ordered by

me,theintervenor,andasataxpayer.U.S.const.art.lV,% 1-2& art.W ,j1;Federalist

78;& 42U.S.C.jj2000bbetseq.SeealsoWltiteHouseOfficeoflntergovermnentalAffairs,

https://ww w .whitehottse.govfiga/.

12

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 12 of 22
W HEREAS,barring suborclinateExecudveBranch from reviewing and using tlae

dassified recordsforcrim inalinvesdgatespurposesisam eaningfulway ofprotecdng

''theconfidendalityofPresidentialcomm unicadons/'Nixon,418U.S.at705& contra.Dkt.

69at10;and,

W HEREAS,thereasonsPresidentsorthecourtsallow independentpersonnelacross

theInteEigenceCommM T torevievvthevery sanlerecordsforotherdoselyrelated

purposesbutnottherem ninderoftheExecutiveBranch donothaveto berevealed in

ordertoprotecttheconfidendality ofPresidentialRecords,Nixon,418U.S.at705;and,

WI-IEItEAS,tedmocratsarethepersonnelacrosstheIntetligenceCommunitywho

usualyreceivetheserecordsandwhosenarrow objectivesarepredselycodified,unlike

in thenot-independentExecudveBranch werepardsans,paxtym em bers,formermem -

bersofCongress,andbureaucratswhoareaccotmtabletovaryinginterests,suchasforeign Heads ofState and inter-governm entalorganizatiortsand those hierarchies,are

likelytoreceiveandbeexposedtheserecords;and,

W HEREAS,an affirm anceofthedefaultprotedionistruleofPresidentialRecords

wilallow theRepublictoremainOneandintact,Nixon,418U.S.at705,Providencelournal,

485U .S.at701,Nixon,433U .S.at447-9,& H ein v.Freedom f'r- ReligionFound.,Inc.,551

U.S.587(2007)(Rather,theywere''createdendrelywitltintheexecudvebranch...byPresidendalexecudveorder.''(quodngFreedom FmpzReligionFound.,Inc.v.Chao,433F.3d

989,997(7thCir.2006)/and,

W HEREAS,theDepartmentofJusticeisnotanindependentagencyofiheExecutive

Branch;and,

W HEREAS,here,the''trial''isofaform erPresident,wlnich wasnotirtidatedbythe

incum bentPresident;and,

13

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 13 of 22
W HEREAS,theenforcem entofNixon,418U.S.at705isdifferentduetotheadvancem entoftedm ology;and,

THEREFORE,PreventingtheUnitedStatesDeparM entofJusdcefrom galningaCcesstothem aterialPresidendalRecordsislawftll,aswellastheappoin% entofthespedalm aster,butthePresidenualRecordsareproperlyreturnedtoPresidentTrump atthe

earliestconvenience;ifnot,atleasta copy ofallrecords,asihePlaintiffm aintainshis

presum pdonofcorrecG essundlprovenotherwise.

FURTHEIIMORE,iltistransacdoncotldextenitolocalgovernm enis,asetofDevolversofSovereigntp andinterferewithlocaljurisdicdons'recordkeepingpracticesandthe

pdvilegesandimmunidesoftheiragents,indudingwhenthosejudsdicdonsweredemarcatedinanotherstate.

W HEREAS,Dkt.69at10-11equivocatesabouttheExecudveBranch-generallywith

themorespedficterminolosesofexecudvePrivilegesand/orlmmtmidesappliedtothe

ExecudveBranch-incumbent-presidentandExecudveBranclwform er-president;and,

W HEREAS Defendantistm persuasivelyarguinp thatinaddidon toif.strespassto

a form erPresident's castle,its Governm entaltm it's needs are of m ore nadonalim -

portanceth% thestatusquoestablished by theExecudveBranclwincumbent-president,

wlaic.hdoesnotdiscriminateagainsttheExecudveBrr G -former-president-plindff,and

madepublidyavailablethroughtheunitedStatesDeparM entofState-officeoftheChief

ofProtocol(whethertheExecudveBrr G -ino mbent-A/omey-Generzisastateactoror

a governmentalactorisirrelevantdue to the orderofprecedence and the Executive

Branclwincum bent-president'sestablishm entofthenadonalsecurity agenda;nonethelessrthesedisdncdonscannotbemuted),Egan,484U.S.at527;seealso,e.g.,M urphy,769

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 14 of 22
Fed.Appx.at792(''Theauthoritytoproted nadonalsecurityinformaiionfalsonthe

Presidentldired1yl./'l,& Dkt.69at13,Pofnderer,114U.S.at29059and,

W G REAS,thePresidentisan agent,in thetermsofihePresidendalRecordsAd

and Federalist78;and,

W l-œllM s,tlaecourtsmustproted thePresidentfrom aggression from llnknown

sourceswitltinExecudveBrancluwlaidlconcurrentlypoliticallynnqwertovaryinginterests,Dkt.69at18quotingEgan,484U .S.at529)and,

W lc lFas,thecom tsm ustbesensitivetotheiniex-workingsand inter-politicsof

theexecutivebranch;

kVHEREAs,hypothedcany,Execudve Brr G -ina bent-Adorney-Generf-Doland-a lcouldhavebeen denied accesstoPresidendalRecordsofExecudveBranch-former-president-Trllm pbyExecudveBrr & -in= bent-president-Biden;and,

W lvltEAs,therefore,thecurrenthappeningsinthecase-at-hand areappeasem ent

tovitalpartsoftheGovernm entandpossiblepoliticalpardesandfadionsthePresident

mustappease,PHH C0rp.,839F.3dat1& 12-13(AstheSupremeCourthasexplained,

ourCortstitudon''wasadoptedtoenablethepeopletogovernthemselves,through their

i lqm#exzer,iqtij.b.atJ9o(Incommoonspeechanécommonappqehensfonthvyareusua. IIy

regardedasidentical;andasordinarilythear-tqofthegovernmentaretheaceqoftheState,becausewithin'

.

W '*

, iheIimitsofitsdelegationofpower,thegovernmentofthejlteisgeneralyconfoundedwiththeSote''

tiself . j

' , and oftenthe formerismeantwhenthe Iatterismentioned.The State itselfisan ldealDersonw.

ï'ino ngible fI (7

, itwisible,immutable.Thèjovernmentisanagent,and,withinthesphereoftheàgency,i

perfec'trepresentative;butoutsideofthat,itisaIawlessusurpation.TheConstitutionoftheStateisthq'

'ilimitoftheauthorityofitsgovernment,andb0thgovernmentandStatearesubjecttothesup' remacyol;

theConstitutionoftheUnitedStates,and ofth.law:madeinpursuancethereof--.Thisdistinuionises-

'

sentialtotheideaofconstitutionalqovernment.Todenvitorblotitoutobliteratesk

theIineofdemarcation' ' ' ''*' ''

'

. $atseparatësconstitutionalgovernmentfrom pbsolptism, freeself-govqrnmentbasedont sovere' T

pfthepeople'from thatdespotism,whetheroftheopeorthemany,w-h.-ic..h. --

e

.-

n-ab.Ie- .s- t-h.e./g.,.o.f .e. jt-at.

iodeclareaqddecreethatheistheState;tosay''édétatè'estmoi.''''j

15

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 15 of 22
electedleaders,''andtheConsdtudon''requiresthataPresidentchosenbytheentireNadonoverseetl'teexecudon ofthelaws.'')(quotingFrceEnterpriseFund'f?.P1Ià.Co.Accf.

OversightBd.,561U.S.477,499(2010))9Holfngsworth,133S.Ct.at2667(''Theyarefree

topursueapurelyideologicalcommitmenttothelaw'sconstitutionalitywithouttheneed

to takecognizanceofresourceconstraints,changesin publicopinionEincludîng pols

factoringtheopinionsofsocialoutcasts,U.S.const.art.lV,j2& amend.XIV,j1,cI.2),

orpotentialramiflcationsforotherstateprioritiesl,l''(appropriationthroughgenomicsl;

UnitedStatesv.Artbrex,Inc.,No.19-1434*23,594U.S. (2021)(Roberts,C.J.,TheConstit-udonalhierarchyreqttires''theexerdseofexecudvepower(toremain)accountableto

thepeople.v);& Dkt.69at18quodngEgan,484U.S.at527(tmauthorizedpersons);and,

W l-mltEAs,thereisruleoflaw,theCourtsmustproted theExecutiveBranda-incumbent-presidentandtheExect iveBrandwform er-presidentfrom aggressions;and,

W I-IEREAS,thecurrentactsareaggressionsagainsttheUnitedStates,fotmdinsom e

WesternHemisphere's-andSisterCommonLawjurisdictions'-governmentalfasltionfor

coupsdetat.

THEREFORE,tlteCourtshouldenterjudgementinfavorofPlaindffzwhoisimmtme

from prosecutionbytheDefendant-o .Gonzalez.

W HEREAS,inaddidontoDkts.21,36,and60,thepoliticalQuesdonDoctdne,tmder

Bakerv.Carr,369U.S.186,217(1962)(atextuallydemoxtstrablecorustit-udonalcommitmentoftheissuetoacoordinatepolidcaldepaztment);and,

W HEREAS,pursuanttothePolidcalQuestionDoctrinetheissueisreservedforthe

Presidencydirectlp fortheinterestofmaintainingPresidentialAutonomy(i.e.inanearlierdrafloftheDedaration oflndependenceof1776,ThomasJeffersonaddressedthe

16

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 16 of 22
Grievances againstthe Parliament,wltich he thoughtcaused the denialofthe Olive

BranchTreatp but,TheKingwassdlgivingpowertoParliament),compareOriginalDraft

(''weutterlydissolveatlpolidcalcozmçcdonwltichmayheretoforehavesubsistedbetween usand thepeopleorparliamentofGreatBritain:and finally w edo assertand

dedarethesecoloniestobefreeandindependentstates,andthatasfreeandindependent

states,theyhaveh111powertolevywar,condudepeace,conkactalliances,establishcommerce,andtodoa1otheradsandtltingswltichindependentstatesmayofrightdo.'')

withFinalDraft/andz

W l-mllEAs,RobertYates,who refused to sign the United States Consdm tion

thoughtthatthejudidarywouldbeable''tomould''theroleofthepresidencp ;and,

W l-mu As,''lhlttmanexpeiienceteachesthatthosewhoexped publicdisseminadon oftlteirrem arksm ay welltem percandorw1t11aconcern forappearancesand for

theirownintereststothedetrimentofthededsionmakingprocess...la)Presidentand

thosewhoassisthim m ustbefreetoexplorealternadvesintheprocessofshapingpolides

and m akingdedsiorksand todo soin away thatm any w ouldbeunwillingto express

exceptprivatelp''Nixon,418U.S.at705& 708;and,

6. https://teachinga ericanhistov .orar/document/rouarh-dral-of-the-declaration-of-l dependence/.

7. https://www.heritage.o'rg/courts/report/aarainst-J'udicial-supremaa.

- the-founders-and-thelimits-the-courts(''Everybodyofmeninvestedwithofice/'Yatesobserved,''aretenaciousofpowen''

Moreover,thisloveofpowerwould''influence''judges''toextendtheirpower,andincreasetheirrightsw''

withtheresultthatihecoul-tswilltendto''givesuchameaningtotheConstimtionina11caseswhereitcan

possiblybedone,aswillenlargethesphereoftheirauthoritpv...rl'heend resultofa11thiswould bea

SupremeCoul'twithpowertorulethecountryinthemostimportantmattersaccordingtoitsownwilltonotonlyexceed itsauthoritybuttousurp others'authority.''Thispower,''Yatessaid,''willenable''fllc

justicesoffhcSupremeCourt''tomouldthegooernmentf?zfoalmostanys/lflcfhagplease.''...YabesfurthercontendedthattheSupremeCourtwouldnotonlybesupremeoverallothercouzls,butthatitwould,infact,

bethesupremepowerinthegovemmenttobecreatedby theConstitution.Thissupremacy,Yatescontended,wouldfollowfromfJ;:Court'spowerofsetlingfor/711otherpolifïcfllactorsthefwf/lorifflfïr:meaningo/'f/zc

Constitution.TheSupremeCouztheobserved,''hasthepower,inthelastresort,todeterminea11questions

thatmayariseinthecourseoflegaldiscussion,onthemeaningandconstnzctionoftheConstitut'1on.'').

L. 17

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 17 of 22
WHEItEA&''liqndesigningthestructureofourGovennmentanddividinganda110-

catingthesovereignpoweramongthreeco-equalbranches,theFram ersoftheCorksdtudon soughttoprovideacomprehensivesystem,buttheseparatepowerszperenotintended

toT erflfcwithabsoluteindependence,''Nixon,433U.S.at442-3(quodngYoungstownSheet

& TubeC0.v.sflzpyer,343U.S.579(1952):and,

Wl-mltMs,theAttorneyGeneralmiltbeappropriateifCongress'interestswere

violatedw1t14thePresidentialRecordsAd,butcf.Id.,2U.S.C.jj192& 271-28814,&AnfA st??zv.Dunn,19U.S.204(1821)(onlywhenCongress'inierestsareviolated,theSegreant-at-Armsdoestheenforcement;seegenerallyTitle2ofiheUnitedStatesCode);and,

W HEREAS,''Rlheessenceofdemocracyisthatthe righttomakelaw restsinthe

peopleandflowstothegovernment,nottheotherwayaroundl,l''Hol/fngswodh,133S.

Ct.at2675-,and,

W HEREAS,the incumbentPresidentofthe UnitedStatesisthe ''nextfriend''ofthe

''therealpartyininterest,''theuniqueSovereign,ofaIthe naturalpersons,eachasovereign,oftheUnited States,Ho//fngsworth,133S.Ct.at2665& 2674.

THEREFORE,theCourtshouldenterjudgement,underFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2)or

(b)(6),infavorofPlaindff,whoisimmtmefrom prosecudonbytheDefendant-M r.Gonzalez,and advisethatprosecutionism ostproperfrom theincumbentPresidentlaimself

orhishonor'scotmselor,i.e.CotmselortothePresident(M r.SteveRicchetti,J.D.),butnot

tlaeAttorney Generalt'I'heHon.MerrickGarland,J.D.). Bu3c./zW hiteHouseGeneral

Cotmselor(M r.SmartF.Delerp J.D.).InreLindsq,158F.3d at1280-2tW ltiteHouse

GeneralCounselunderthecommandoftheinctmbentPresidentv.DOJ).Ho//fngswo/h,

18

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 18 of 22
133S.Ct.at2665& 2673(referringtoProvfdenceJourna/Co.,485U.S.at700).Federalist78.MaineCmty.Hea/thOptfons,140S.Ct.at1334(Alito,J.,dîssenting)(Headof

W ashington,D.C.shoulddirectitsnat'lStateandGovernment,anordinaryfederaicommonIaw matter).Al1documentsshouldbereturnedtoPlaindff.

INTHEAI-TERNATIVE,thecourtmaydismissunderFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(7).

IN THEALTERNATIVE,sincetheDefendant'sactsarelm consdtudonaland catm ot

beratifiedtobecom econsdtudonal,asDefendantom ittedtheincumbentpresident-l-lead

ofStateand-l-leadofGovernm entagainsttheincumbentPresident'sownOrderforProtocol,ihecoul'tm ay disntissand rulein favorofPlaintifffortheDefendant'sundean

hands.

INTc ALTERNATIVE,theCottrtm ayissueanOrdertoShow CausetotheDefendantfor1aw enforcementjurisdicdon.

ATALtCOsT& thisCourtshouldavoidcreadngaslipperyslopesothattheinctlm -

bentPresidentwillbesubjecttoarrestbytheincumbentAtlorneyGenerakwho,but,

servesatthehonor'spleasure,orcreateanunconstitudonalautonom y ofexecudvedepartm ents,wltichwillnotbeaccotm tabletothePeople,-or,sometimes,totheirvarying

interests-theepitomeofexecudvetyranny.

''(A1prose(modonl,howeverinartfuly pleaded,mustbeheldtolessstringent

standardsth= for.m alpleadingsdraftedbylawyers.''Ericùonv.Pardus,551U.S.89,94

(2007).

Iusem yConsdtudonalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknowingfrom mytm dergraduateand1aw school,jurisdoctorcandidacp educations,andpolidcalofficesand

from readinglaw outsideofform alschoolingforthew ritinganddiscussiolw argtlm ents,

19

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 19 of 22
andmodonsofthesef'ilings,seeDkt.21at5& 20andsupra,p.20(signatureline).Ho/-

/fngswo/h,133S.Ct.at2667& 2670-71(''uniqueIegalstatus'').

ImoveforIeavetofilethisthird amended Dld.87.

Im ovetoreinstatem yM odontoCondnueW ithoutPre-payingFilingFeesatDkt.

22,toavoid defaultand interestchargesonothermonetarycommitments.

Re tfullysub tted,

/s/RajK.Pate

T.E.,T.E.Raj Patel(prose4 sujîjvy6850East21st ta-eet +& ya

Indianapolis * 40

, IN 46219 y . c . o

MarionCounty 7 j .%C

3'a1'7-z4o5l0o-6@6o5.m1(aciel.1co)m rbcr y/*-yf-é g 1JP t. o atz

www.rajpatel.live %b o -,7 r''r.rI.v,tJ.D.Candidate,NotreDameL.Sch.2015-2017

President/studentBodyPresident,StudentGov'iAss'nof

EmoryU.,Inc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

StudentBodyPresident,BrownsburgCmty.Sch.

Corp./president,BrowrtsburgI-lighSch.St-udentGov't

2009-2010(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.from theNotreDam eL.Sch.StudentB.Ass'ntothe

Ind.St.B.A ss'n 2017 .

DeputyRegionalDirector,YoungDem ocratsofAm .-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Fotm der& ViceChair,Ind.HighSch.Dem ocrats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.ttndep.l,OxfordC.Republicansof

Em ory U .,Inc.2011-2012

Clerk'sO'ccretainsc/pfcswithctmpiffcrhighlightingfphelpflc/zf!fyamendments.

20

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 20 of 22
CERTIFICA TE OF SERV ICE

IcerlifythatlservedacopyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)TltirdAmendedDkt.

87on10/3/2022tobelow individualsviathee-mail:

JamesM .Trusty

I RAI-I,PLLC

1717PermsylvaniaAve,NW ,Stlite650

W ashington,DC 20006

202-852-5669

Email:jtrusty@ifralalaw.com

Lindsey H alligan

511SE51 Avenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

7204 35-2870

Em ail:lG dseyhalligan@otltlook.com

G ristopherM ichaelK ise

ChrisKise& Assodates,P.A.

201EastParkAve.Ste,51 Floor

Tallahassee,b''la32301

(850)270-0566

chris@ckise.net

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverman,Thom pson,Slutkin,& W laite,

LLC

400EastPrattStreet,Suite900

Balfim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

eCOrCOrM @Si1Verm anZ Om PSOn.COm

JuanAntonioGonzalez

U NITED STATES AW ORNEY

99NE41 Street,81 Floor

M iam i,Fl33132

Telephone:(305)961-9001

Email:jur .r toNo.gom alez@ttsdoj.gov

Jay1.Bratt,Chief

Cotmterintelligence& Expo/ Control

Secdon N at'lSecul'ityD iv.

950PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW

W ashington,D .C.20530

(202)233-0986

jay.brattz@usdoj.gov

PresidentJoeBiden

c/oMarinaM .Kozmycz,AssodateGen.

Counsel

TheE.O.P.attheW hiteHouse

1600PezmsylvaniaAvenueNW

W ashinpon,D.C.20500

Phone:202-457-1414

(REDACTEDJ

Dated:O ctober3,2022

sp cf'hlllysub '

,/' ., t

/s/RaJPatel

, T.E.,T.E.RajK atel(P Se)

6850Easi21st t'reet

Indianapolis,I 46219

M arionCotmty

317-450-6651(ce11)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

E- 21

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 21 of 22
'rc oo ZNNJWLF l(J:M t vFxSzaC ' >p.'*l:

- pm n F4G*ç11:@$: ..

1) PRESSFIRMLYTOSM L: FLATRA-it

POSTAGEF

IO R IT Y

d A IL

P R E S S'

kT RXTE

J/LU'PE

k-rE.AkvbqIaHT

qdulefrqpPaçkw ePickup,

scantheQRcode.

Dx Dx

% M

Z ' % .

'1Q* 'Y

JSPS.COM/PICKUP

1Ps10q01- 009006 gryqjjjyxqglj: --j

j

I

y.

7.y'

w.;s

)

w.,jIj.,.=

----

'

- -

' '

. .- - -

'

. . .----

'

.

- -... .

'

, . ..

.

' '

.

,

,

'

.

'

.

'

. ,

.

.

.

1 '

7l;7.7lr!)III!l..

!

j g1Nmj4as!gli)XAYENrVAELDOPE 0625F0ROî2M41!)s2129

-1!---1lh;1-l!12!-6,!;-1r@-$:;,191î-'=,,

.,.

-'1

-

--'

--

-,-

--

PRIO RITY M A IL EXPR ESS I-DAY

RajPatel 0007

6850 E 21ST ST (317)450-6651

INDIANAPOLIS IN 46219 ..'

WAIVEROFSIGNATURE . '' '.

* .

...'- r*. .

,:... ,

-

.. ( .:..,'.t .

SHIP Clerk ofSD FIa t J' .

TO: PG R Fed ê . ' . Blgd.andUscöurihouàe

701 Clem atis St

Rm .702

W estPalm Beach FL 33401

:

: . 1

' Usps TRACKING #

i .,

' .. . ,

'

l .' .

' .t

9470 11110807 8825 0115 27

l -

l

quest.

j

'

téPO/FPO/DPOand

? .

!rcompletedetails..

lations only. .

s.Fordetail:regarding dlair

IS.OOm b ' '

;I.ARv IONLABELMAv4EFkoùl

1,

*

s.

!

1!ury,.u:c=.=Q..x

I

!. . .blscnr'-..z:8)-.-''

ITERNATIUON/.CU

t' . .

-

- '

.

'

tLA B EL H E R E

) '

:

'

t

!

i

i

ètcluded.for.

jtinations..

1

J! e

(.

$100of

1..J

dO ' *

in ran:

:.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2022 Page 22 of 22