alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36220-36221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0098]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Denise 
McLamb, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8030 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0098.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Application for Survivors' and Dependents' Educational 
Assistance (Under Provisions of Chapter 35, Title 38, U.S.C.), VA Form 
22-5490.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0098.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: VA Form 22-5490 serves as an application for Dependents' 
Educational Assistance (DEA). Spouses, surviving spouses, and children 
of veterans must submit evidence to establish eligibility and 
entitlement to DEA under Title 38, U.S.C., 3513. VA uses the 
information to determine if an individual claimant qualifies for DEA 
benefits.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on March 9, 2000 at page 12627.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 10,050 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 30 minutes.

[[Page 36221]]

    Frequency of Response: Once--Initial Application.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 20,100.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0098'' in any correspondence.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
    By direction of the Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 00-14264 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-CV-22756-CMA

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WHITE HOUSE BLACK MARKET, INC.

a Florida for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses all his claims in this action with prejudice, with each party 

to bear his/its own attorney’s fees and costs. 

Dated: December 27, 2022 

Respectfully submitted,

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com 

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:22-cv-22756-CMA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/27/2022 Page 1 of 1
* The Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0501n.06 No. 13-4266 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JOYCE ANN NIXON, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PATRICK R. DONAHOE, ) SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES POSTMASTER ) GENERAL, ) ) Defendant-Appellee. )

BEFORE: MOORE and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; STAFFORD, District Judge. *
PER CURIAM. Joyce Ann Nixon appeals from the district c ourt's entry of summary judgment in favor of Patrick R. Donahoe, the United States Postmaster General, on Nixon's claims of employment discrimination based on gender and retaliation. We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Gecewicz v. Henry Ford Macomb Hosp. Corp. , 683 F.3d 316, 321 (6th Cir. 2012). After carefully reviewing the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court's opinion adopting—and overruling Nixon's obj ections to—the report and recommendation, the arguments of the parties on appeal, and the reco rd in light of the parties' appellate briefing, weare satisfied that the district court properly gr anted summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster General. Finding no reason to enter a duplicative opinion here, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment.
Mt An 2-1 (1-99)


Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

January 1999 4 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

January 1999 5 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

January 1999 6 NASS, USDA


The next "Cattle on Feed" report will be released at 3 p.m. ET on February 19, 1999.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the

basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,

and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Century Controls International, Inc.
File No. 000-30313


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         In connection with the Annual Report of Century Controls International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 29, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leo Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date: June 14, 2004                               By:  /s/ Leo Christiansen
                                                      --------------------------
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Century Controls International, Inc. and will be retained by Century
Controls International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 203.43 Inspection of Federal flood control works. ( a ) *Required inspections.* A completed Federal flood control project, or completed functional portions thereof, is granted Active status in the RIP upon transfer of the operation and maintenance of the project (or functional portion thereof) to the non-Federal sponsor. Federal flood control works will be periodically inspected in accordance with 33 CFR 208.10 and Engineer Regulation (ER) 1130-2-530, Flood Control Operations and Maintenance Policies. These periodic inspections of Federal flood control works are also, for simplicity, known as CEI's. If a Federal project is found to be inadequately maintained on a CEI, then it will be placed in an Inactive status in the RIP. [Note: This is a separate and distinct action from project deauthorization, which is not within the scope of PL 84-99 activities.] A Federal project will remain in an Inactive status until such time as an adequate maintenance program is restored, and the project is determined by the Corps to be adequately maintained.
( b ) *Advice and reporting.* Information on the results of CEI inspections will be furnished in writing to non-Federal sponsors, and will be maintained in Corps district offices. Non-Federal sponsors will be informed that a CEI rating of Unacceptable will cause the flood control work to be placed in an Inactive status, and not eligible for Rehabilitation Assistance. Non-Federal sponsors will be informed that maintenance deficiencies found during CEI's may negatively impact on eligibility of future Rehabilitation Assistance, and the degree of local cost-sharing participation in any proposed work. Follow-up inspections can be made by the Corps to monitor progress in correcting deficiencies when warranted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of June 5, 2000.

A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, June 8, 2000 at 11 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10), permit consideration for the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled Thursday, June 8, 2000 will be:

Institution of injunctive actions; and

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: June 1, 2000.

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14108  Filed 6-1-00; 11:39 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00282

- CR Rodolfo C. VILLARREAL , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR8703 Honorable Melisa Skinner , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 25, 2011
DISMISSED Rodolfo Villarreal entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded nolo contendere to aggravated assault against a public servant . The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea

- bargain

case , and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Villarreal timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).04

- 11

- 00282

- CR

- 2

- This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id

. The court gave Villarreal notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. Ap p.

– San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Villarreal’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response, stating s he has reviewed the record and can f ind no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and counsel’s notice, we agree that Villarreal does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to dete rmine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Cheshire

No. 7105

#### Dorothy E. Vincent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security *& a.*

August 29, 1975

*486
      *New Hampshire Legal Assistance (Mr. Raymond J. Kelly), by*brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*Joseph Stewart, by*brief and orally, for the defendant New Hampshire Department of Employment Security.

Duncan, J.

This case raises the question whether a claimant for unemployment compensation who is unsuccessful before a lower tribunal may recover from the State the costs of 'appeal upon obtaining favorable review. RSA ch. 282 (1966). In 1971, plaintiff was denied unemployment compensation on the ground that she had voluntarily terminated her employment, and this decision was upheld by the superior court. In *Vincent v. State,*113 N.H. 383, 308 A.2d 526 (1973), this court set aside that verdict and remanded the matter for a determination of whether plaintiff had been available for work as required by RSA 282:3-C (1966). *Id.*at 387, 308 A.2d at 528. On remand, the superior court found for the plaintiff and awarded her full benefits of $814. Several months thereafter plaintiff filed a motion for costs in the amount of $250 for printing the reserved case and the cost of the transcript which she incurred on the first transfer to this court. After hearing on September 11, 1974, the Superior Court *(Loughlin,*J.) granted the motion and defendant filed this bill of exceptions. RSA 490:10 (1968).

RSA 282T3-B (Unemployment Compensation, Protection of Rights and Benefits) provided that “[n]o individual claiming benefits shall be charged fees of any kind in any proceeding under this chapter by the commissioner of the department of employment security, or his representatives or any court or any officer thereof.” Laws 1937, 178:1; *see*RSA 282T3-B (Supp. 1973). The nature and extent of the “fees” proscribed by this directive are not particularized.

While RSA 282T3-B (1966) requires the waiver of fees, it does not authorize the awarding of fees as costs against the adverse party. Although plaintiff argues that charging such expenses as costs to the State would be financially expedient, since they will merely be passed on to the federal government, this affords no ground for implication that they should be treated as costs of *487court. *Employment Security Comm’n v. Doughty,*13 Ariz. App. 494, 496, 478 P.2d 109, 111 (1970). The statute makes it clear that any agency of the department or any court or officer thereof normally charging “fees of any kind” must forego charges from which claimants are made exempt by the statutory provision. *Sweeney v. Board of Review,*43 N.J. 535, 544-45, 206 A.2d 345, 350 (1965).

*Exception sustained.*

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 478 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 478

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the National Labor 
Relations Board to assert jurisdiction in a labor dispute which occurs 
  on Johnston Atoll, an unincorporated territory of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
            to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the National Labor 
Relations Board to assert jurisdiction in a labor dispute which occurs 
  on Johnston Atoll, an unincorporated territory of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

    Paragraph (1) of section 14(c) of the National Labor Relations Act 
(29 U.S.C. 164(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking the period after ``1959''; and
            (2) by inserting the following: ``: Provided further, That 
        the Board shall not decline to assert jurisdiction over a labor 
        dispute which occurs on Johnston Atoll, an unicorporated 
        territory of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31(a)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Alan R. Abrams, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Servidyne, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: December 15, 2006 /s/ Alan R. Abrams   Alan R. Abrams   Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER98-2770-006 (Consolidated with Docket Nos. EC98-40-000 
and ER98-2786-000)]


American Electric Power Service Corporation Central and South 
West Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 24, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 22, 2000, American Electric Power Service 
Corporation, on behalf of the operating companies of the American 
Electric Power System, and Central and South West Services, Inc., on 
behalf of the operating companies of Central and South West 
Corporation, submitted a compliance filing containing substitute 
versions of the System Integration Agreement, the System Transmission 
Integration Agreement, and the Transmission Reassignment Tariff 
accepted for filing by the Commission in Docket No. ER98-2770-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14125 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M