alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4804

To require that fines paid to the United States as a result of motor fuel

price investigations shall be rebated to consumers in the form of reductions in Federal motor fuel excise taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To require that fines paid to the United States as a result

of motor fuel price investigations shall be rebated to

consumers in the form of reductions in Federal motor

fuel excise taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gas Price Equity Act

5 of 2000’’.
2

•HR 4804 IH

1 SEC. 2. REBATE TO CONSUMERS OF FINES PAID TO UNITED

2 STATES AS A RESULT OF MOTOR FUEL PRICE

3 INVESTIGATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—If, as a result of any investigation

5 by the United States into motor fuel prices, any person

6 or entity pays a fine or other penalty to the United States,

7 the amount so paid shall be rebated to consumers as pro8 vided in subsection (b).

9 (b) EXCISE TAX REDUCTIONS.—

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—The rates of tax under the

11 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on any motor fuel

12 shall be reduced by the amount (and for the period)

13 determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be

14 necessary to carry out this section with respect to

15 such fuel.

16 (2) AMOUNT OF REDUCTION.—The amount of

17 fuel tax rate reduction shall, with respect to any

18 fuel, be the amount which will result in a reduction

19 in revenues to the United States equal to the

20 amount of fines and other amounts referred to in

21 subsection (a) with respect to such fuel.

22 (3) REGIONAL DIFFERENTIATION.—The Sec23 retary of the Treasury shall, to the extent possible,

24 provide for fuel tax rate reductions in any region

25 which are proportional to the extent of the conduct
3

•HR 4804 IH

1 (to which the fine or other amount relates) which oc2 curred in such region.

3 (4) REDUCTIONS TO BE REFLECTED IN RETAIL

4 PRICE.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall take all

5 reasonable steps to attempt to ensure that the re6 ductions under this Act are reflected in the retail

7 price of the fuel.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.156 COW operations: Meeting manual requirements. Except as allowed in § 157.158, the master of a foreign tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10a(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) that has the *Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual* approved under § 157.112 and is operating in the navigable waters of the United States or transferring cargo at a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and the master of a U.S. tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10a(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) shall ensure that during each COW operation— ( a ) The procedures listed in the *Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual* are followed; and
( b ) The characteristics recorded in the *Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual* under § 157.150(b) are met.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43709, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11628, Mar. 22, 1985]
#### § 136.225 Authorized claimants.

A claim for net loss of revenue due to the injury, destruction, or loss of real property, personal property, or natural resources may be presented only by an appropriate claimant sustaining the loss. As used in this section and § 136.277, “revenue” means taxes, royalties, rents, fees, and net profit shares.
#### Jumper *v.*Dobson, administratrix.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided February 14, 1907.

Complaint. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior eourt. January 18, 1906.

*Hendricks, Smith & Christian,*for plaintiff..

*Buie <& Knight,*for defendant.

•Atkinson, J.

There was no material error in the rulings on the admission of evidence. The extracts from the charge of the court upon which error was assigned stated correct propositions of law, and were not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The use of the word “plaintiff,” where “defendant” was intended, was such a palpable slip of the tongue that it could not have misled the jury. See, in this connection, ■ *Turner*v. *Elliott,*ante, 338. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no' sufficient reason appears for reversing the judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
# ToC

Funding Totals by State

Funding Percent of Total by State

A-9 Funding Totals and Percents by State (original table)

Funding Totals by Region

Funding Percent of Total by Region

A-9 Funding Totals and Percents by Region (original table)

# A-9 Money amt-% by State

Table of Contents

# Funding Totals by State

Table of Contents

# Funding Percents by State

Table of Contents

# A-9 Money amt-% by Region

Table of Contents

# Funding Totals by Region

Table of Contents

# Funding Percents by Region

Table of Contents
#### Kent v. Armistead.

Argued March 16th, 1813.

i. Detinue — Slaves—Declaration — Necessary Allegations, † — A declaration in detinue, for a slave, is insufficient to support the action, if it omit to state that the slave in question belonged to, or was the property of, the plaintiff: and such defect is not cured by verdict.

In this case the declaration was in the following words : “The district composed of Richmond, Westmoreland, Lancaster and Northumberland counties, to wit: Lewis G. Armistead complains of Thomas Kent, in custody, &c., of a plea, that he render to *him*one negro slave named Spencer, of the value of 500 dollars, which from him he unjustly detains ; for that whereas the plaintiff, on the day of 1806, at the parish of , and county of Northumberland aforesaid, which is within the jurisdiction of this court, delivered to the defendant the said negro, of the value aforesaid, to be by him safely kept, and by him to be redelivered to the plaintiff, when thereto afterwards requested ; yet the defendant, although often requested, the said negro slave to the plaintiff hath not yet re-delivered, but the same to him to deliver hitherto hath and still doth refuse ; to his damage 500 dollars ; therefore he brings suit, &c.”

The plea was non detinet. Several exceptions were taken at the trial, which need not here be mentioned, as no opinion was expressed upon them by this court. A verdict was found and judgment entered for the plaintiff; to which a writ of supersedeas was awarded.

*Stanard for the plaintiff in error.

Williams for the defendant.

†

See generally, monographic *note*on “Detinue and Replevin” appended to Hunt v. Martin, 8 Gratt. 678.

Saturday, March 20th, 1813. The president pronounced the court’s opinion, “that, (without deciding either of the points stated in the bills of exceptions,) the declaration is insufficient to support the action; it not being stated therein that the slave in question belonged to, or was the property of the plaintiff, now defendant.” (4)

Judgment reversed, and entered in favour of the plaintiff in error.

(4)

 Note. See 1 Chitty on pleading, 365; 3 Tuck. Bl. 152 Saund. 379, note 13.
|EXHIBIT 99(a)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation (the "Registrants") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies with respect to each registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated as of May 13, 2003
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By /s/ Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.                  | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                | 
|Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer | 



|By /s/ G. C. Ketcham                  | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|                                      | 
|G. C. Ketcham
Chief Financial Officer | 



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and will be retained by the Registrants and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**TERSAUN COLE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 174 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 26th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 1343** 

JAMES JONES, JR. ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
G.E. GAS TURBINES LLC, Greenville ,
Defendant

- Appellee ,
and

G.E. ENERGY ,
Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:11

- cv
- 02693

- HMH )

Submitted : June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

James Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

James Jones, Jr. , appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of G.E. Gas Turbines LLC on

Jones’ discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to

2000e

- 17 ( 2006 & Supp. IV 201 0 ), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006).

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm

. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process

.

AF FIRMED
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 9 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of the Secretary 

of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election 

of the Secretary of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be 

2 notified of the election of the Honorable Nancy Erickson 

3 as Secretary of the Senate. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Enacted: Services for Native 

Americans Program

1992 

Separate authority for elder rights activities 

bringing together LTC Ombudsman; prevention 

of abuse, neglect, and exploitation; and state 

legal assistance development programs

1973 

Enacted: Area Agencies on Aging, Multipurpose Senior Centers, and Community 

Service Employment Program

1978

Enacted: Home-delivered 

Nutrition Program

New Requirement: Long-term Care 

(LTC) Ombudsman Services

1993 

Commissioner on 

Aging elevated to 

Assistant Secretary 

for Aging

1972 

Enacted: Congregate 

Nutrition Program

1961

1st White House Conference on Aging 

held in Washington, DC

Led to key legislation, including the OAA

1960: 16.6 Million Older Adults Living in the U.S.

1970: 20.1 Million Older Adults Living in the U.S.

1980: 25.5 Million Older Adults Living in the U.S.

1990: 31.2 Million Older Adults Living in the U.S.

2000: 35 Million Older Adults Living in the U.S.

2015: 47.8 Million Older Adults Living in the U.S.*

1965

OLDER AMERICANS ACT 

(OAA) ENACTED 

Administration on Aging 

and state agencies on aging created

Learn more at http://acl.gov/

LTC Ombudsman Program received 

separate authorization of funds

2000 

Enacted: National Family 

Caregiver Support Program

THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT: 

AGING WELL SINCE 1965

1987 

Enacted: Disease Prevention, 

Health Promotion, and Elder Abuse 

Prevention Activities

*2014 Census Projections for Americans 65+

2006 

Enacted:

• Home and Community-Based 

LTC Development Activities

• Evidence-based Disease Prevention 

and Health Promotion Services

Authority to implement Aging and Disability 

Resource Centers in all states
#### THE PEOPLE ex rel. DENNIS HOGAN, and DENNIS HOGAN, Plaintiffs, *v.*CORNELIUS FLYNN, Defendant.

1872, *chap.*438 — *clerics and assistant clerics of District Courts—how appointed*— *tenure of office of.*

Exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at the General Term. A verdict in this case was directed for plaintiff, and the entry of judgment thereon suspended.

The act of 1872 (chap. 438), by section 1, provides - that there shall he a clerk and an assistant clerk in each of the District Courts of the city of New York, who shall be appointed by the justices of .said courts, and that they shall hold office and perform the same duties and possess the same powers as now prescribed by law.

It also provides that they shall receive the same salary, and that it shall be paid by the comptroller.

The General Term *held,*that, under the statute, the clerk and assistant were to be appointed by each justice of each of the courts, and that the legislature did not intend to confer upon a number of justices combined, the right to interfere with or control in any way the selection of the officers of the court in which each presided—officers strictly local and whose duties were limited to the court for which they were appointed (1 Edm., 71; 3 R. S. [5th ed.], 1106; Sedg. on Stat., 219, and cases cited); and that such office was held during the pleasure of the authority making the appointment. *648(1 R. S. [Edm. cd.], 107.) As to the tenure of the office of clerk, the decision of- the General Term in *The People ex rel. Dolan*v. *Lane*was overruled. (This case on appeal is reported in 55 N. Y., 219.)*.*

*Roscoe H.*Channing, for the plaintiffs.

*Wheeler H.*Peckham, for the defendant.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., dissented.

Daniels, J., concurred.

Motion for new trial granted, costs to abide event.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7561]


Determination on Imposition and Waiver of Sanctions Under 
Sections 603 and 604 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Year 2003 (Pub. L. 107-228)

    Consistent with the authority contained in section 604 of the 
Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Pub. L. 107-228) 
(the ``Act''), the Delegation of Authority in the April 30, 2009, 
Memorandum for the Secretary of State, and Department of State 
Delegation of Authority No. 245-1, and with reference to the 
determinations set out in the Report to the Congress transmitted 
pursuant to section 603 of that Act, regarding the extent of 
noncompliance by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) or 
Palestinian Authority with certain commitments, I hereby impose the 
sanction set out in section 604(a)(2), ``Downgrade in Status of the PLO 
Office in the United States.'' This sanction is imposed for a period of 
180 days from the date that the report under section 603 of the Act is 
transmitted to the Congress or until such time as the next report under 
section 603 is required to be transmitted to the Congress, whichever is 
later.
    Furthermore, I hereby determine that it is in the national security 
interest of the United States to waive that sanction, pursuant to 
section 604(c) of the Act. This waiver shall be effective for a period 
of 180 days from the date hereof or until such time as the next report 
under section 603 of the Act is required to be transmitted to Congress, 
whichever is later.
    This determination shall be reported to Congress promptly and 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 10, 2011.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-21270 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4837 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4837

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow distributions to be 
  made from certain pension plans before the participant is separated 
                            from employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2000

 Mr. Pomeroy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow distributions to be 
  made from certain pension plans before the participant is separated 
                            from employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Phased Retirement Liberalization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN PENSION DISTRIBUTIONS ALLOWED BEFORE SEVERANCE FROM 
              EMPLOYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus 
plans) is amended by inserting after paragraph (34) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(35) Distribution prior to severance from employment.--A 
        trust forming part of a defined benefit plan (or a defined 
        contribution plan which is subject to the funding standards of 
        section 412) shall not constitute a qualified trust under this 
        section if the plan provides a distribution to a participant 
        who has not severed from employment and the distribution is 
        made before the earliest of the following with respect to the 
        participant:
                    ``(A) Normal retirement age (as defined in section 
                411(a)(8)).
                    ``(B) Attainment of age 59\1/2\.
                    ``(C) The date the participant completes 30 years 
                of service.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to years beginning after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
§ 168.40 Applicable waters and number of escort vessels. The requirements of this part apply to the following waters: ( a ) *Prince William Sound:* Each tanker to which this part applies must be escorted by at least two escort vessels in those navigable waters of the United States within Prince William Sound, Alaska, and the adjoining tributaries, bays, harbors, and ports, including the navigable waters of the United States within a line drawn from Cape Hinchinbrook Light, to Seal Rocks Light, to a point on Montague Island at 60°14.6′ North, 146°59′ West, and the waters of Montague Strait east of a line between Cape Puget and Cape Cleare.
( b ) *Puget Sound and certain associated waters:* Each tanker to which this part applies must be escorted by at least two escort vessels in those navigable waters of the United States and Washington State east of a line connecting New Dungeness Light with Discovery Island Light and all points in the Puget Sound area north and south of these lights. This area includes all the navigable waters of the United States within Haro Strait, Rosario Strait, the Strait of Georgia, Puget Sound, and Hood Canal, as well as those portions of the Strait of Juan de Fuca east of the New Dungeness-Discovery Island line.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4718 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4718

 To extend for 3 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2000

   Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself and Mr. Gekas) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend for 3 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277, as 
amended by Public Law 106-5 and Public Law 106-70, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``July 1, 2000'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2000''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``September 30, 1999'' and 
                inserting ``June 30, 2000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``October 1, 1999'' and inserting 
                ``July 1, 2000''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on July 1, 2000.
                                 <all>
```