alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 334.605 Meloy Channel, U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach, Florida; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States as defined at 33 CFR part 329, within the area bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing from the shoreline at latitude 25°46′20.07′′ N, longitude 080°08′50.94′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′22.69′′ N, longitude 080°08′44.01′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′22.02′′ N, longitude 080°08′42.14′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′12.23′′ N, longitude 080°08'35.33′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′09.13′′ N, longitude 080°08′40.74′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46'11.63′′ N, longitude 080°08'43.36′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′17.22′′ N, longitude 080°08′47.17′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′17.15′′ N, longitude 080°08′47.62′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′17.63′′ N, longitude 080°08′49.33′′ W; thence to latitude 25°46′18.91′′ N, longitude 080°08′50.24′′ W; thence proceed directly to a point on the shoreline at latitude 25°46′18.76′′ N, longitude 080°08′50.71′′ W thence following the mean high water line to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The restricted area described in paragraph (a) of this section is only open to U.S. Government vessels. U.S. Government vessels include, but are not limited to, U.S. Coast Guard and Coast Guard Auxiliary vessels, Department of Defense vessels, state and local law enforcement and emergency services vessels, and vessels under contract with the U.S. Government. Warning signs notifying individuals of the restricted area boundary and prohibiting all unauthorized entry into the area will be posted along the property boundary and, as appropriate, on the piers of the MacArthur Causeway Bridge adjacent to the restricted area.
( 2 ) All persons, vessels, and other craft are prohibited from entering, transiting, drifting, dredging, or anchoring within the restricted area described in paragraph (a) of this section without prior approval from the Base Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach or his/her designated representative.
( 3 ) Fishing, trawling, net-fishing, and other aquatic activities are prohibited in the restricted area without prior approval from the Base Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach or his/her designated representative.
( 4 ) The restrictions described in paragraph (b) of this section are in effect 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Base Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Base Miami Beach and/or such persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
[77 FR 42652, July 20, 2012]
**1996-  chickens_and_eggs_12.20.96chickens_and_eggs_11.22.96chickens_and_eggs_10.22.96chickens_and_eggs_09.23.96chickens_and_eggs_08.22.96chickens_and_eggs_07.23.96chickens_and_eggs_06.24.96chickens_and_eggs_05.24.96chickens_and_eggs_04.23.96chickens_and_eggs_03.22.96chickens_and_eggs_02.23.96chickens_and_eggs_01.31.96

**
§ 385.36 Elimination or transfer of existing legal sources of water. ( a ) Pursuant to the provisions of section 601(h)(5)(A) of WRDA 2000, Project Implementation Reports shall include analyses to determine if existing legal sources of water are to be eliminated or transferred as a result of project implementation. If implementation of the project shall cause an elimination or transfer of existing legal sources of water, then the Project Implementation Report shall include an implementation plan that ensures that such elimination or transfer shall not occur until a new source of water of comparable quantity and quality is available to replace the water to be lost as a result of implementation of the Plan. The Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall determine if implementation of the project will cause an elimination or transfer of existing legal sources of water by comparing the availability of water with the recommended project with the pre-CERP baseline developed in accordance with § 385.35(a), by using the water quality and other analyses developed in § 385.35(a)(1)(iii), and by using other appropriate information.
( b ) The Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District shall develop a guidance memorandum in accordance with § 385.5 for approval by the Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor, that describes the process for determining if existing legal sources of water are to be eliminated or transferred and for determining how and when a new source of water of comparable quantity and quality as that available on the date of enactment of WRDA 2000 is available to replace the water to be lost as a result of implementation of the Plan. The guidance memorandum shall also describe the process for comparing the recommended project with the pre-CERP baseline to determine if existing legal sources of water are to be transferred or eliminated as a result of project implementation. The guidance memorandum shall include a definition for existing legal sources of water for the purposes of determining if existing legal sources of water are to be eliminated or transferred. Existing legal sources of water shall include those for: ( 1 ) An agricultural or urban water supply;
( 2 ) Allocation or entitlement to the Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida under section 7 of the Seminole Indian Land Claims Settlement Act of 1987 (25 U.S.C. 1772e);
( 3 ) The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida;
( 4 ) Water supply for Everglades National Park; and
( 5 ) Water supply for fish and wildlife.
( c ) Until guidance is issued, issues involving existing legal sources of water should be resolved on a case-by-case basis considering all factors that can be identified as relevant to decisions under the savings clause.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes regulations governing the design and construction of marine sanitation devices and procedures for certifying that marine sanitation devices meet the regulations and the standards of the Environmental Protection Agency promulgated under section 312 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1322), to eliminate the discharge of untreated sewage from vessels into the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. Subpart A of this part contains regulations governing the manufacture and operation of vessels equipped with marine sanitation devices.
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA, 

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ and

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., 

REINIER CORTES, AND 

ANDREA GONZALEZ 

QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWING MOTION IN LIMINE No. 8

Plaintiffs, Delio Batista, Carlos Lopez, Mariana Lopez, and Rafaela Valiente, file this 

Notice of Withdrawing Motion in Limine Number 8, which was included in their omnibus motion 

in limine at ECF No. 77. 

Dated this 26th day of June 2023.

s/Toussaint Cummings, Esq.

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. (119877)

toussaint@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/26/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 160.103 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to any— ( 1 ) Vessel on the navigable waters of the United States, except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section;
( 2 ) Bridge or other structure on or in the navigable waters of the United States; and
( 3 ) Land structure or shore area immediately adjacent to the navigable waters of the United States.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to any vessel on the Saint Lawrence Seaway.
( c ) Except pursuant to international treaty, convention, or agreement, to which the United States is a party, this subpart does not apply to any foreign vessel that is not destined for, or departing from, a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and that is in: ( 1 ) Innocent passage through the territorial sea of the United States;
( 2 ) Transit through the navigable waters of the United States which form a part of an international strait.
#### § 167.103 In the approaches to Narragansett Bay, RI, and Buzzards Bay, MA: Buzzards Bay approach.

(a) A separation zone 1 mile wide is established and is centered upon the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 41°10.20′ N | 71°19.10′ W. |
| 41°21.80′ N | 71°07.10′ W. |

(b) A traffic lane 1 mile wide is established on each side of the separation zone.

Note to § 167.103:

A restricted area, 2 miles wide, extending from the southern limit of the Narragansett Bay approach traffic separation zone to latitude 41°24.70' N, has been established. The restricted area will only be closed to ship traffic by the Naval Underwater System Center during periods of daylight and optimum weather conditions for torpedo range usage. The closing of the restricted area will be indicated by the activation of a white strobe light mounted on Brenton Reef Light and controlled by a naval ship supporting the torpedo range activities. There would be no ship restrictions expected during inclement weather or when the torpedo range is not in use.

[USCG-2010-0718, 75 FR 77534, Dec. 13, 2010]
II

Calendar No. 782

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4888

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2000

Received

JULY 27, 2000

Read the first time

SEPTEMBER 5, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To protect innocent children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4888 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Innocent Child Protec3 tion Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF INNOCENT CHILDREN.

5 It shall be unlawful for any authority, military or

6 civil, of the United States, a State, or any district, posses7 sion, commonwealth or other territory under the authority

8 of the United States to carry out a sentence of death on

9 a woman while she carries a child in utero. In this section,

10 the term ‘‘child in utero’’ means a member of the species

11 homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried

12 in the womb.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 782

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4888

AN ACT

To protect innocent children.

SEPTEMBER 5, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
#### JAMES B. RYER, Respondent, *v.*THOMAS WIBERLEY, Appellant.

*Agreement for*commissions— *construction of.*

This action was brought to recover commissions claimed to be due under a written agreement by which the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff ten per cent on all sales made to customers that he solicited, or that might be made through his influence. *Held,*that by a fair interpretation of the agreement, whenever the solicitation was of, or the influence was exercised upon, a person who had already dealt with the defendant, the commission should be confined to the transaction accomplished, thus requiring separate sales by the plaintiff *633to entitle him. to a continuing benefit under the agreement, unless from the length of time during which the customer had ceased to deal with the defendant, it would be a fair inference that he had discontinued his patronage; while, if the customer were made such by the intervention of the plaintiff’s solicitation or influence, the commissions should be payable on all sales to him as long as the agreement continued unbroken.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

*F. G. Salmon*and *James R.*Angel, for the appellant.

*Peabody &*Baker, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment modified, and as' modified affirmed, without costs to either party.
VIP.Docs-000155 ALL VIP 26 A 000092

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 1 of 4
VIP.Docs-000156 ALL VIP 26 A 000093

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 2 of 4
VIP.Docs-000157 ALL VIP 26 A 000094

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 3 of 4
VIP.Docs-000158 ALL VIP 26 A 000095

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 4 of 4
#### § 25.133 Redelegation of authority.

The authority delegated in § 25.131 and in 49 CFR 1.46(j) to the Chief Counsel may, unless otherwise limited, be redelegated in whole or in part to settlement authorities established by the Chief Counsel. Information concerning current settlement authorities is available from the offices indicated in § 25.103.
March 28, 2000



Ms. Sharon Surguy, C.C.T.S.
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562


          PNC  Mortgage  Acceptance  Corp.,   Commercial  Mortgage  Pass-Through
          Certificates, Series 1999-CM1


          Pooling and Servicing Agreement


          OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


          Pursuant to the  requirements  of that certain  Pooling and  Servicing
          Agreement  governing the  referenced  Trust (the "PSA"),  it is hereby
          certified  that (i) the  undersigned  has  completed  a review  of the
          servicer's  performance  of its  obligations  under  the  PSA  for the
          preceding  calendar  year;  (ii)  to the  best  of  the  undersigned's
          knowledge on the basis of that review the servicer has  fulfilled  all
          of its  obligations  under  the  PSA  throughout  such  period  in all
          material respects;  (iii) to the best of the undersigned's  knowledge,
          the subservicer,  of the servicer under the PSA, if any, has fulfilled
          its  obligations  under its  sub-servicing  agreement  in all material
          respects;  and, (iv) no notice has been received from any governmental
          agency or body which would  indicate a challenge or question as to the
          status of the Trust's qualification as a REMIC under the U.S. Code.



/s/ Charles J. Sipple
Charles J. Sipple                       Date
Executive Vice President
#### § 25.105 Definitions.

*Accrual date.* The day on which the alleged wrongful act or omission results in injury or damage for which a claim is made or when the claimant discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the alleged wrongful act or omission.

*Claim.* A written notification of an incident accompanied by demand for the payment of a sum certain of money, other than for ordinary obligations incurred for services, supplies, or equipment.

*Settle.* To consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, compromise (when specifically authorized by law), and dispose of a claim by disapproval or approval, in whole or in part.

*Settlement authority.* A person authorized to settle a claim.

[CGD 80-033, 46 FR 27109, May 18, 1981; 46 FR 29933, June 4, 1981]
March 5 , 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

R e: American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption

( Dallas/Fort Worth

, Texas

– Aguascalientes , Mexico)

(Docket DOT

- OST

- 201 5

- 004 7 )

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding American

Airlines’ Application for an Exemption ( DFW

- AGU ) . We received no objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited allocation of the Exemption

requested in the Application.

Sincerely,

Howard Kass

Vice President

– Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick,

Managing Dir ector, Regulatory and International

Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

11 01 17 th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 ( 202 ) 326

- 5 15 3 Fax: ( 202 ) 898

- 4810CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on March 5 , 2015 , I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing

Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

englets@state.gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.s.duncan@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

gmurphy@crowell.com (Couns el for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com (Alaska)

dheffernan@cozen.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.c om (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

slachter@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@ hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

______________ ________

Abigail Donovan
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6205** 

KELVIN GOULD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. CITY OF NE; JEFFREY COLE ROUNTREE, Attorney; TYRONE C. JOHNSON, Attorney; ARTISHA K. TODD, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorn ey , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Jerome B. Friedman , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cv - 00571

- JBF

- JEB )

Submitted : July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ke l vin Gould seeks to appeal the district co urt’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. In his petition, Gould claimed that he had been in custody for three years awaiting trial on several charges and his continued
det ention pending resolution of those charges entitled him to habeas relief. Gould was convicted of the state charges while this appeal was pending. Th erefore , we dismiss the appeal as moot. We also deny all of Gould’s pending motions including: the motion for transcripts at government expense; the motion to withdraw/relieve/substitute counsel; the motion for appeal of final judgment; and the motion for “ Faretta ” hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
GENIO GROUP, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

                     Code of Ethics for Financial Executives

      Each of the Financial Executives of Genio Group, Inc. (the "Company")
shall adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities
governing their professional and ethical conduct. For purposes of this Code of
Ethics, Financial Executive is defined as the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and any other senior officer with financial oversight
responsibilities:

      1. Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
of interest in personal and professional relationships.

      2. Provide information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant,
timely and understandable.

      3. Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and
local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.

      4. Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and
diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing independent
judgement to be subordinated.

      5. Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
the Financial Executive's work except when authorized or otherwise legally
obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of the
Financial Executive's work will not be used for personal advantage.

      6. Share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the needs
of the Company.

      7. Proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
peers in the Financial Executive's work environment.

      8. Achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources
employed or entrusted to the Financial Executive.

<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

I certify that:

1.    I have read and understand the Company's Code of Ethics for Financial
      Executives.

2.    I will comply with the Code of Ethics for Financial Executives for as long
      as I am a Financial Executive.


Signature:________________________

Date:____________________________

Print Name:_______________________


                                       2
§ 25.131 Delegation of authority. ( a ) The Chief Counsel is delegated the following authority: ( 1 ) To carry out the functions of the Secretary and to exercise the Commandant's authority as commanding officer for all Coast Guard personnel in regard to claims brought under Article 139, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 939);
( 2 ) To carry out the functions of an officer designated by the Secretary under the so-called “Foreign Claims Act”, as amended (10 U.S.C. 2734);
( 3 ) To request that the Department of Defense pay any meritorious claims arising under International Agreements in accordance with Title 10 U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b;
( 4 ) To carry out the functions of the Secretary under the Act of October 9, 1962, as amended (10 U.S.C. 2737);
( 5 ) To carry out the functions of the Secretary under the Act of August 16, 1937, as amended (14 U.S.C. 546);
( 6 ) To carry out the functions of the Secretary under the Act of June 15, 1936, as amended (14 U.S.C. 937);
( 7 ) To carry out the functions of the Secretary under the Act of August 4, 1949, as amended (14 U.S.C. 938);
( 8 ) To carry out the functions of the Secretary under the Act of February 19, 1941, as amended (14 U.S.C. 3911);
( 9 ) To carry out the functions of the head of a Federal agency's designee under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended (28 U.S.C. 2672);
( 10 ) To carry out the functions of the head of an agency under the Military Personnel and Civilian Employees' Claims Act, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3721);
( 11 ) To carry out the functions of the head of an agency under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3711);
( 12 ) To carry out the functions of the head of the department under the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 2651-2653);
( 13 ) To review and approve for payment any voucher for payment of a claim for $25 or less the authority for payment of which is questioned by a certifying or disbursing officer;
( 14 ) To establish procedures consistent with the applicable statutes and regulations for the administration of all claims. Note:
Under the Military Claims Act (10 U.S.C. 2733), the Secretary has authorized the Chief Counsel to settle and pay claims, see 49 CFR 1.46(j).
( b ) The Director of Finance and Procurement is delegated the authority to carry out the functions of the head of an agency under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3711).
[CGD 80-033, 46 FR 27109, May 18, 1981, as amended by CGD 82-112, 48 FR 4773, Feb. 3, 1983; USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33639, June 25, 2001; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58276, Sept. 18, 2020]
#### § 187.1 Which States are affected by this part?

States electing to participate in the Vessel Identification System (VIS) are affected by this part.