alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

Background and Purpose

A. Goal: 

The goal of the project is to modernize Iowa’s congregate meal program infrastructure, delivery 

mechanisms, and outreach to increase the number of consumers and meals served.

B. Objectives: 

1) Establishing a restaurant partnership infrastructure in the Elderbridge AAA service region

2) Developing flexible approaches to congregate meal service delivery mechanisms to target and 

outreach to two generations of older adults

3) Modernizing a streamlined intake process through technology use

4) Identifying seniors who may be food insecure, socially isolated, and rural and providing nutrition 

education.

C. Overview of Project: 

The Iowa Department on Aging in partnership with Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) received a 2020 

Administration for Community Living Nutrition Innovations Grant to modernize Iowa’s Congregate Meal 

Program infrastructure. The Iowa Café project will transform traditional congregate meal sites to 

attractive restaurant partnership sites for older adults to gather and enjoy nutritious meals. This will be a 

mutually beneficial project for Iowa’s food insecure older adults and local communities to generate 

economic stimulus.

D. Project Results: 

• County 1 had 20 participants before the grant and 80 participants after the grant 

• NEI3A (AAA): Served 48,000 meals during the timespan of the grant 

• 95% of participants showed a decrease in social isolation 

Figure A. Demonstrates the increase of restaurant 

partnerships per year with The Iowa Department 

on Aging for the grant. 

Figure B. Demonstrates the number of meals 

each restaurant served over the course of the 

grant period.

18%

29% 53%

Increase in 

Restaurant 

Partnerships per Year

1st year 2nd year 3rd year

10050

12598

25638

9038

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Bob's Café BBQ Bills The Corner

Resturant

Shrimp Shack

# of Meals per Restaurant
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST**

**Computation of Ratio of Earnings toFixed Charges**

**(dollars in thousands)**

 
|                               |   | **Three  Months Ended  March 31,** |   | **Year Ended  December 31,** |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | **2004**                           |   | **2003**                     |   | **2003** |   | **2002** |   | **2001** |   | **2000** |   | **1999** |   |
| Earnings:                          |   |                               |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                         |   | $                                  | 13,269 |                         | $      | 12,059 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   | $ | 58,437 |   | $ | 14,834 |   |
| Fixed charges                      |   | 10,370                             |   | 7,849                        |   | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   | 15,366 |   | 18,768 |   |
| Adjusted earnings                  |   | $                                  | 23,639 |                         | $      | 19,908 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   | $ | 73,803 |   | $ | 33,602 |   |
|                               |   |                               |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                     |   |                               |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                   |   | $                                  | 10,370 |                         | $      | 7,849 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   | $ | 15,366 |   | $ | 18,768 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |   | 2.3                                | x      | 2.5                          | x      | 2.2 | x | 2.7 | x | 3.3 | x | 4.8 | x | 1.8 | x |
|                                    |        |                                    |        |                              |        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
SERVED: MARCH 4, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF KMC ACQUISITION CORPORATION d/b/a KIRKHILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY FAADOCKET NO. CP08S00004 (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2008-0235
ORDER OF CIDEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

REASSIGNING AND DISMISSING PROCEEDING The above-captioned proceeding is reassigned from Administrative Law Judge Isaac D. Benkinto the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe undersigned, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons
onthe attached Service List. By "Withdrawal ofComplaint," served February 10,2015, Complainant states that it :. t-;·- .-.. '

"withdraws the Complaint inthe above-referenced matter." 1 Accordingly, pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed withprejudice.

1The Withdrawal ofComplaint's caption shows "DocketNo. CP05S00050," which identifies a case in which the appeal was dismissed onAprillO, 2007. ABG Caulking Contractors, Inc., FDMS FAA-2005-22888, Doc. No. 26, http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2005-22888-0026. The Withdrawal ofComplaint's case title, original case number, and certificate ofservice, however, are consistent withthe above-captioned case.

### Complainant shall send the Judge and the Docket a copy of any compromise order or

SO ORDERED.



### Attachment

- Service List



### -2-FAA DocketNo. CP08S00004 (Civil Penalty Action) AMENDED SERVICE LIST

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0002

ONE COPY (Via First-Class Mail, Following CC via Fax, IfShown) KMC Acquisition Corporation, d/b/a Kirkhill Mfg., Respondent Attn: President 12023 WoodruffAvenue Downey, CA 90241 Arthur A. Ebbs & NeilL. Wilcove, Respondent's Counsel FreemanMathis & Gary 100 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30339 TEL: 770-818-0000 FPC(: 770-937-9960 Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 SouthernRegion Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 20636 TEL: 404-305-5200 FPC(: 404-305-5223 Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative LawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings (M-20) 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FPC(: 202-366-7536

2 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -3-
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Advaxis, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:



(1)   the Report of the Company filed today fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



|Date: February 13, 2013 | /s/ Thomas Moore
|----------------------- | ----------------
|                        | Name:           
|                        | Title:
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 For the year ended
    
    For the three months endedDecember 31, 2008
    
    December 31, 2007
    
    December 31, 2008
    
    December 31, 2007Income before Taxes & Cumulative Effect of Change
In Accounting Principle
    
    $
    4,007
    
    
    $
    (32,041
    )
    
    $
    (10,720
    )
    
    $
    (1,919
    )Plus: Fixed ChargesInterest expenseDeposits
    
    
    152,452
    
    
    
    192,660
    
    
    
    35,049
    
    
    
    47,905Other
    
    
    91,997
    
    
    
    169,871
    
    
    
    16,976
    
    
    
    42,796Total
    
    
    244,449
    
    
    
    362,531
    
    
    
    52,025
    
    
    
    90,701Rent Expense
    
    
    4,523
    
    
    
    3,574
    
    
    
    1,156

    
    
    
    892Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    248,972
    
    
    
    366,105
    
    
    
    53,181
    
    
    
    91,593Earnings
    
    $
    252,979
    
    
    $
    334,064
    
    
    $
    42,461
    
    
    $
    89,674Ratio of Earnings to fixed chargesIncluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.02
    x
    
    
    0.91
    x
    
    
    0.80
    x
    
    
    0.98
    xExcluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.04
    x
    
    
    0.82
    x
    
    
    0.41
    x
    
    
    0.96
    xFixed charges
    
    
    248,972
    
    
    
    366,105
    
    
    
    53,181
    
    
    
    91,593Earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividendIncluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.02x
    
    
    
    0.91x
    
    
    
    0.80x
    
    
    
    0.98xExcluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.04x
    
    
    
    0.82x
    
    
    
    0.41x
    
    
    
    0.96x
§ 151.69 Operating requirements: Discharge of garbage outside special areas. ( a ) Except for ships operating in the Great Lakes which must comply with section 151.66, when a ship is operating outside of a special area specified in § 151.53, no person may discharge garbage into the sea, except as allowed in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
( b ) The following allowed discharges of garbage shall only be conducted while the ship is en route and as far as practicable from the nearest land, but never less than— ( 1 ) 12 nautical miles for food wastes, except that, such food wastes may be discharged outside of 3 nautical miles from nearest land after they have been processed with a grinder or comminuter specified in § 151.75;
( 2 ) 12 nautical miles for cargo residues that cannot be recovered using commonly available methods for unloading. The discharged cargo residues must not be harmful to the marine environment; and
( 3 ) 100 nautical miles and the maximum water depth possible for animal carcasses. Discharge shall be conducted in accordance with the applicable International Maritime Organization guidelines.
( c ) Cleaning agents or additives contained in cargo hold, deck, and external surfaces wash water may be discharged only if these substances are not harmful to the marine environment.
( d ) Mixtures of garbage having different discharge requirements must be: ( 1 ) Retained on board for later disposal ashore; or
( 2 ) Discharged in accordance with the more stringent requirement prescribed by paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
[USCG-2012-1049, 78 FR 13492, Feb. 28, 2013]
[Civ. No. 11465.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

May 26, 1937.]

#### In the Matter of the Estate of JOSIE W. ZEIGER, Deceased. BERTILLE ZEIGER, Appellant, v. MYRON W. SILVERTON, Petitioner; ROBERT LELAND SHEWARD et al., Respondents.

*155William Kay Crawford for Appellant.

Hunsaker, Moote. & Longcroft and Lloyd E. Keiser for Respondents.

GRAIL, P. J.

—This case was transferred by the Supreme Court to this court for decision along with several other probate cases. In the trial court Commissioner J. W. Mullin, Jr., who is one of the assistant judges in the Probate Court of Los Angeles County, presided as judge *pro tempore.*The appeal is from a decree construing the will of the testator.

The part of the will to be construed when boiled down reads as follows: “I hereby give in fee to my nephews, Louis Zeiger, Robert Sheward and Norman Sheward, the residue of my estate, provided that if said Louis Zeiger should die leaving no children surviving him then, in that event, his said bequest shall go in equal proportions to [others].” Louis Zeiger died after the death of the testator but before the distribution of the estate, leaving no children surviving him. The decree from which the appeal is taken distributed his portion to those persons named as devisees in case he died childless.

The sole question necessary for determination is: Should the Louis Zeiger portion have been distributed to the widow of Louis Zeiger? If so, the judgment should be reversed; if not, it should be affirmed.

Appellant contends that the first part of the sentence which we have quoted from the will shows a clear and distinct intention to give to Louis Zeiger an estate in fee simple, and that this' devise cannot be cut down unless there later appears in the will an intention expressed in equally clear and distinct words to cut it down, citing Civil Code, section 1322, and *Smith*v. *Wood,*217 Cal. 541, 544 [20 Pac. (2d) 48].

The defect in the appellant’s point is that in order to get the so-called clear and distinct intention to give an estate in fee simple it is necessary for him to strike down his sentence in the middle and use only the first portion of it, ignoring *156that part of it which qualifies the portion upon' which he relies. Such violence does not lend itself to a fair and reasonable construction of the will. The very sentence upon which the appellant relies for an unqualified estate in fee contains language making the devise provisional, i. e., “provided that if said Louis Zeiger should die leaving no children surviving him then, in that event, his said bequest shall go” to others. The language of the sentence is clear and distinct enough, especially that part of it which says that the devise to Louis Zeiger is provisional. There is in the will no unqualified devise in fee to Louis Zeiger—no unqualified devise to him in fee at all. The decision is controlled by *Estate of Briggs,*186 Cal. 351 [199 Pac. 322], and *Estate of Carothers,*161 Cal. 588 [119 Pac. 926].

Judgment affirmed.

McComb, J., concurred.
**Exhibit 31(d)2**

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Ronnie R. Labrato, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 7, 2007

/s/Ronnie R. Labrato

Ronnie R. Labrato

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres

DELIO BATISTA, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Allow Electric 

Equipment in the Courtroom for Use During Each Day of Trial [ECF No. 86]. Being fully 

advised, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. The following persons 

are permitted to bring the designated electronic equipment into the Courtroom for each day of 

the trial, which commences on July 10, 2023: 

Owner Electronic Equipment

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Laptop w/ charging cord

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Laptop w/ charging cord

Delio Batista Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Carlos Lopez Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Mariana Lopez Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Rafaela Valiente Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 30th day of June, 2023.

 _______________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                      |  |       |  |              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | -------------
|/s/    THOMAS F. ROSE                                                 |  | Date: |  | March 16,2006
|Name: Thomas F. Rose                                                  |  |       |  |              
|Title: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and          Secretary |  |       |  |              



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Thomas Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas
      Kidrin


Thomas
      Kidrin


Chief
      Executive Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31(b)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Mark J. Thomas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofServidyne, Inc.; and  2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment no. 1 does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by the report.        Date: March 14, 2007 /s/ Mark J. Thomas   Mark J. Thomas   Chief Financial Officer
Submitted on record and briefs December 2,

reversed and remanded December 30, 1992

#### EDWARD E. ALLEN, *Appellant, v.*Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Respondent.*

(92C-10105; CA A76075)

842 P2d 815

George E. Price, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Durham, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*520PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief. *Boone v. Wright,*314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992). We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 153.107 [Reserved]