alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Grafton

No. 7563

#### State of New Hampshire v. Delwood Smith

January 31, 1977

*David H. Souter,*attorney general and *Richard B. Michaud,*attorney, by brief for the state.

Delwood Smith, by brief, pro se.

Per curiam.

Defendant was convicted in a jury-waived trial for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense, contrary to RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1975). Defendant’s exceptions were transferred by *Johnson,*J.

Defendant contends that the arresting officer committed perjury during the trial and points to various places in the transcript where the officer stated *“1*don’t recall,” and where he made statements which were contrary to defendant’s version of the facts. The various examples given by defendant involve facts unrelated to the merits of the case. Although some of the statements could be found to be erroneous, it was for the trial court to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses, to resolve conflicts, and to decide whether, with relation to the essential and relevant facts, the state had -met its burden of proof. *State v. Underwood,*110 *78N.H. 413, 415, 270 A.2d 599, 601 (1970). We cannot say that the evidence did not support the verdict.

Defendant further argues that he should be acquitted because he was not given the *Miranda*warnings, *Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U.S. 436 (1966), until after he had been taken to the police station. He argues that he was deprived of his liberty when he was placed under arrest at the scene and was entitled to be given the warnings at that time. However, the *Miranda*warning requirement is a precondition to questioning only. Failure to comply results not in acquittal, but in exclusion of any statements obtained. Because no statements were obtained in response to questions between the time of arrest and the giving of the warnings, any failure to give the warnings earlier is irrelevant.

*Exceptions overruled.*
§ 167.200 In the approaches to Chesapeake Bay Traffic Separation Scheme: General. ( a ) The traffic separation scheme in the approaches to Chesapeake Bay consists of three parts: a Precautionary Area, an Eastern Approach, and a Southern Approach. The Southern Approach consists of inbound and outbound lanes for vessels drawing 12.8 meters (42 feet) of fresh water or less, separated by a deep-water (DW) route for inbound and outbound vessels with drafts exceeding 12.8 meters (42 feet) in fresh water and for naval aircraft carriers. Each part is defined geographically, using North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83), in §§ 167.201, 167.202, 167.203.
( b ) All vessels approaching the Traffic Separation Scheme in the Approaches to Chesapeake Bay should use the appropriate inbound or outbound traffic lane.
[CGD 90-039, 59 FR 21937, Apr. 28, 1994, as amended by USCG-2010-0718, 75 FR 77534, Dec. 13, 2010]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Validian Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB , as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-KSB/A, for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-KSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-KSB.



[ex32b002.gif]



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.























1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-52543, Form S-8 No. 33-52545, Form S-8 No. 33-54229, Form S-8
No. 33-56857, Form S-8 No. 33-56861, Form S-8 No. 33-61399, Form S-8 No.
33-20431 and Form S-8 No. 333-25865) pertaining to the Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan, Management Incentive Program, LTV Steel Group Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, Non-Employee Directors' Equity Compensation Plan, The Hourly
Employee Stock Payment Alternative Plan, Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for
Certain Key Executives of Continental Emsco Company, Salaried Employee Stock
Option Plan and The LTV Corporation Amended and Restated Management Incentive
Program, respectively, of The LTV Corporation (Debtor-in-Possession) of our
report dated March 22, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of The LTV Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.





Cleveland, Ohio                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 27, 2001
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 720 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2008 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. SPECTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

DECEMBER 9, 2008 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas approximately 37,680 people will be diagnosed with 

pancreatic cancer this year in the United States; 

Whereas pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of 

cancer death in the United States; 

Whereas Randolph (‘‘Randy’’) Frederick Pausch, who was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2006, delivered his 

‘‘Last Lecture’’ on September 18, 2007, which gave a 

voice to victims of pancreatic cancer, and inspired people 

to live life to the fullest; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

SRES 720 ATS 

Whereas the lecture by and advocacy of Randy Pausch have 

brought, and will continue to bring, renewed advocacy 

and commitment to the field of pancreatic cancer research and treatment; 

Whereas the lecture by and advocacy of Randy Pausch have 

touched countless people throughout the United States 

and the world and encouraged them to change their lives 

for the better; 

Whereas 75 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within 

the first year of their diagnosis and only 5 percent survive more than 5 years, making pancreatic cancer the 

deadliest of any cancer; 

Whereas there has been no significant improvement in survival rates in the last 30 years and pancreatic cancer research is still in the earliest scientific stages; 

Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal 

treatment options for pancreatic cancer; 

Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer present themselves, it is generally too late for an optimistic prognosis, 

and the average survival rate of those diagnosed with metastasis of the disease is only 3 to 6 months; 

Whereas the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is 40 to 50 

percent higher in African-Americans than in other ethnic 

groups; and 

Whereas it would be appropriate to observe November as 

Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month to educate communities across the Nation about pancreatic cancer and the 

need for research funding, early detection methods, effective treatments, and treatment programs: Now, therefore, 

be it 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

SRES 720 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the goals and 

2 ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ALFRED PANZER I,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND

URBAN DEVELOPMENT; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16942

D.C. No. 3:15

- cv

- 01655

- MEJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Maria

- Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted July 11, 2017 ***

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

John Alfred Panzer I appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims

. We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** Panzer consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16942

U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to

comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8

, McHenry v. Renne , 84 F.3d 1172,

1177 (9th Cir. 1996) , and w e affirm

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Panzer’s action

for failure to comply with Rule 8 because the second amended complaint does not

contain “a short and plain statement of the claims showing that [ Panzer ] is entitled

to relief. ” Fed. R. Civ. 8(a)( 2 ), ( d )(1); McHenry , 84 F.3d at 1174 ( affirming

dismissal under Rule 8, and recognizing that “ [p ]rolix, confusing complaints . . .

impose unfair burdens on litigants and judges”).

The district court did not abus e its discretion in dismissing Panzer’ s second

amended complaint without leave to amend because Panzer was provided with two

opportunities to amend and further amendment would be futile. See Cervantes v.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth

standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper

when amendment would be futile); Chodos v. West Publ ’ g Co., Inc. , 292 F.3d 992,

1003 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[W]hen a district court has already granted a plaintiff leave

to amend, its discretion in deciding subsequent motions to amend is particularly

broad.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Panzer’s motion for transcripts , set forth in his opening brief, is denie d.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0612

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TOMMY ESTEL SANSON II,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kelley A. Barstad 

is granted an extension of time to and including June 3, 2024, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2024

05/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0612
ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT

This Addendum to the Management and Consulting  Agreement  ("Agreement") is made
and entered into on August 29, 2001, but shall have an effective date of January
10, 2001,  ("Effective  Date") by and between Cosmoz  Infrastructure  Solutions,
Inc., a Delaware corporation  ("Company") and  SharpManagement,  LLC, a Delaware
LLC ("SharpManagement"). Any previously executed Addendums to the Management and
Consulting Agreement between the parties are hereby null and void.

Whereas, under the original Agreement,  the Company retained  SharpManagement to
provide services to the Company;

Whereas,  the one-year term under the original  Agreement expired on January 10,
2000, and SharpManagement has continued to provide services in good faith;

Whereas, the Company desires  SharpManagement to continue to provide services to
the Company;

Now,   therefore,   in  consideration   duly  noted  herein,   the  Company  and
SharpManagement (collectively the "Parties") agree as follows:

All terms and conditions of the Agreement  (attached hereto) entered into on May
17,  2000,  shall be adopted  and shall be given  continuity  to this  Addendum,
excluding  the terms and  conditions  under  paragraphs  2 and 4, which shall be
modified as follows:

    2.   Compensation.

              (a) Not applicable;

              (b) The Parties agree to extend the term of the Agreement  entered
                  into on May 17, 2000, for an additional  year term,  effective
                  January 10, 2001.  The Company  shall pay to  SharpManagement,
                  during the term of this extension to the Agreement  $15,000.00
                  per month  through  March 31, 2001 and $5,000.00 per month for
                  the  remainder  of the  one-year  extension  period  from  the
                  Effective Date; and

              (c) Not applicable.

    4.   Term.  This Addendum shall begin with the Effective Date of January 10,
         2001 and shall continue for one year from such date. The term shall not
         automatically renew.

Company:                                 SharpManagement:
Cosmoz Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.    533 Airport Blvd., Suite 400
199 California Drive, Suite 207          Burlingame, CA 94010
Millbrae, CA 94030


By: /s/ Wing Yu                          By: /s/ Wilfred Shaw
---------------                          --------------------
Wing Yu, COO                             Wilfred Shaw, Managing Member
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 15
 
Exhibit 15--Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information
 
Board of Directors
AmSouth Bancorporation
 
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and in their related Prospectuses, of our report dated August 14,
1998 relating to the unaudited consolidated financial statements of AmSouth
Bancorporation and subsidiaries which are included in its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1998:
 
  Form S-3 No. 33-55683 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common
  Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-52243 pertaining to the assumption by AmSouth
         Bancorporation of FloridaBank Stock Option Plan and FloridaBank
         Stock Option Plan-1993;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-52113 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive
  Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-35218 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive
  Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-37905 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-9368 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation
  Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-2927 (as amended) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase
  Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 2-97464 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation
  Plan;
 
  Form S-3 No. 33-35280 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common
  Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-19016 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation
  Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-58777 pertaining to the Director Restricted Stock Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-02099 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift
  Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-05631 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation 1996 Long
         Term Incentive Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-27107 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Employee
  Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-41599 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Deferred
         Compensation Plan and the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation
         Plan for Directors of AmSouth Bancorporation; and
 
  Form S-3 No. 333-44263 (as amended) pertaining to the AmSouth
  Bancorporation Shelf Registration Statement.
 
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a
part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of Sections 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
August 14, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1146; MM Docket No. 99-246; RM-9593; RM-9770]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Winslow and Mayer, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a proposal filed on behalf of Desert West Air 
Ranchers Corporation, the Commission reallots Channel 236C from Winslow 
to Mayer, Arizona (RM-9770), as that community's first local aural 
transmission service, in lieu of previously proposed Camp Verde, 
Arizona (RM-9593), and modifies the license for Station KFMR(FM) to 
specify Mayer as its community of license. See 64 FR 37926, July 14, 
1999. Coordinates used for Channel 236C at Mayer, Arizona, are 34-25-00 
NL and 112-00-30 WL. With this action, this docketed proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective July 10, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-246, adopted May 17, 2000, and 
released May 26, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is 
amended by adding Mayer, Channel 236C.

    3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is 
amended by removing Winslow, Channel 236C.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-14379 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
annual report of Santander BanCorp on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

     Jose Ramon Gonzalez, the Chief Executive Officer, Carlos Garcia, the Chief
Operating Officer and Maria Calero, the Chief Accounting Officer of Santander
BanCorp, each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
          (d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Santander BanCorp.


Date: April 27, 2006                    By: /s/ Jose Ramon Gonzalez
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer


Date: April 27, 2006                    By: /s/ Carlos M. Garcia
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Senior Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Operating Officer


Date: April 27, 2006                    By: /s/ Maria Calero
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Accounting Officer
!function(n){"use strict";n.fn.emulateTransitionEnd=function(t){var i=!1,r=this;n(this).one("bsTransitionEnd",function(){i=!0});return setTimeout(function(){i||n(r).trigger(n.support.transition.end)},t),this},n(function(){n.support.transition=function(){var n=document.createElement("bootstrap"),t={WebkitTransition:"webkitTransitionEnd",MozTransition:"transitionend",OTransition:"oTransitionEnd otransitionend",transition:"transitionend"};for(var i in t)if(void 0!==n.style[i])return{end:t[i]};return!1}(),n.support.transition&&(n.event.special.bsTransitionEnd={bindType:n.support.transition.end,delegateType:n.support.transition.end,handle:function(t){if(n(t.target).is(this))return t.handleObj.handler.apply(this,arguments)}})})}(jQuery);
May 15,2015 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

U.S Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

8949 S 83rd Court 

Hickory Hills, IL 60457 

My company has been providing limousine services for 20 years in the Chicago area, and I get a 

lot of my business from travelers arriving at O'Hare International. If foreign airlines are kept 

from flying into our airports, competition will be eliminated. Travelers will see prices go up 

while quality goes down. This would not be good for companies like mine that serve an 

international clientele, which is why you should maintain Open Skies. 

Big airlines like United, American, and Delta want the government to limit where foreign 

carriers can fly, because they are losing business to them. This is not the answer, because there 

should always be a free market. If a few companies gain a monopoly, they will have too much 

control over setting prices, and prices will increase. This is already evident--airfares are over 

one-third less on flights under Open Skies because of the competition. 

I'm Middle Eastern, and I mostly fly Middle Eastern airlines, primarily Royal Jordanian. Most 

travelers out of O'Hare who fly to the Middle East prefer Emirates or Qatar. This is because their 

airfares are up to $400 cheaper, and they also provide better service. It would be bad for 

travelers and bad for business if everyone has to fly one of three airlines, because there would be 

limited choices. Please, leave Open Skies as is and let there be competition among airlines on 

airfares and services. 

Sincerely, 

FreddeAyed 

President 

s 10-150520-026 
FreddeAyed 

President 

Freddy's Limousine & Cars Inc. 

8949 S 83rd Court 

Hickory Hills, IL 60457 

510-150520-026 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

United Stales Department of Transportation 

A'n'N: Docket Center 

Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Ill Jll j il111/' i 11,11' I !Ill' ill• p,llll'l'll j 'I IIi j 11,1111) l) 11, Jl
§ 25.703 Claims payable. A claim for damage to or loss of real or personal property caused by a military member of the Coast Guard is payable under this subpart when the damage or loss results from: ( a ) Willful or intentional acts;
( b ) Wrongful taking; or
( c ) Riotous, violent, and reckless conduct or acts of depredation by an individual or group that evidences willfulness.