alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23
 AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT
 MercadoLivre.com Atividades de Internet Ltda., LESSEE KW Radar Construtora e Incorporadora
Ltda., LESSOR
    Clause One
  E) TERM
 Five (05) years or sixty (60) months.
Beginning: November 01, 2004  End: October 31, 2009
After such period has elapsed, this agreement shall be automatically renewed for five (05)
years, from November 01, 2009 up to October 31, 2014; the agreement may be terminated by the
Parties with no charges whatsoever under clause 15 of the agreement.
 Clause Two
 3  LESSEE is prohibited from assigning, transferring or subleasing the premises, in whole or
in part, for value or under free lease, without LESSORs written prior consent. Regardless of
that provided in the preceding sentence, LESSOR shall not refuse to give its consent in the
event of sublease to companies that are provenly part of the LESSEEs economic group and LESSOR
hereby authorizes subleasing to the companies Ibazar.com Atividades de Internet Ltda,
Ebazar.com.br Ltda and MercadoPago.com Representações Ltda. In such events LESSEE shall be fully
liable for the payment of sublease rent.




---



##### 



Clause Three
 15  This Agreement may be terminated by each party at any time, without any charge, upon a
sixty (60) days prior notice.
 Clause Four
 16  Upon termination of the lease by one of the parties, as provided for in clause 15 of this
instrument, LESSEE shall return the premises fully vacant of persons and things, in as good
condition as it has received them, regardless of any judicial or extra-judicial notice or
notification, under penalty of being subject to the fine specified in paragraph one of this
clause, and LESSOR may take the measures it deems necessary for the premises to be vacated.
 FINAL PROVISIONS
    MercadoLivre Atividades de Internet Ltda
 KW Radar Construtora e Incorporadora Ltda
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.759 Security Zones; Ports of Jacksonville, Fernandina, and Canaveral, Florida. ( a ) *Regulated area.* Moving security zones are established 100 yards around all tank vessels, cruise ships, and military pre-positioned ships during transits entering or departing the ports of Jacksonville, Fernandina, and Canaveral, Florida. These moving security zones are activated when the subject vessels pass the St. Johns River Sea Buoy, at approximate position 30 deg. 23′ 35′′ N, 81 deg, 19′ 08′′ West, when entering the port of Jacksonville, or pass Port Canaveral Channel Entrance Buoys # 3 or # 4, at respective approximate positions 28 deg. 22.7 N, 80 deg 31.8 W, and 28 deg. 23.7 N, 80 deg. 29.2 W, when entering Port Canaveral. Fixed security zones are established 100 yards around all tank vessels, cruise ships, and military pre-positioned ships docked in the Ports of Jacksonville, Fernandina, and Canaveral, Florida.
( b ) *Regulations.* In accordance with the general regulations § 165.33 of this part, entry into these zones is prohibited except as authorized by the Captain of the Port, or a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer designated by him. The Captain of the Port will notify the public of any changes in the status of this zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
( c ) *Definition.* As used in this section: cruise ship means a passenger vessel, except for a ferry, greater than 100 feet in length that is authorized to carry more than 12 passengers for hire.
( d ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70051, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
[COTP Jacksonville 02-066, 68 FR 3186, Jan. 23, 2003]
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Contact

															Home/Contact ContactADR2022-02-04T10:31:34-05:00
			
			Contact Us**By Mail:**
Office of Conflict Management and Prevention
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service
250 E. St. SW 7th Floor
Washington, DC 20427
**By Email:**
ADR@fmcs.gov Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.823 Gallants Channel. The draw of the US 70 bridge, mile 0.1, at Beaufort, will open as follows: ( a ) From 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., the draw need only open on the hour and on the half hour; except that Monday through Friday the bridge need not open between the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.
( b ) From 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., the bridge will open on signal.
[USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37315, June 21, 2012]
**Exhibit 31(d)1**

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Susan N. Story, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2006

/s/Susan N. Story

Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer
Strafford

No. 7063

#### State of New Hampshire v. Russell F. Bailey

March 31, 1975

*150
      *Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, *Edward N. Damon,*attorney, and *John L. Ahlgren,*attorney *(Mr. Ahlgren*orally), for the State.

*Alfred Catalfo, Jr.,*by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Per curiam.

Defendant was convicted of a sexual assault on a minor, a misdemeanor in violation of RSA 632:5. The Trial Court *(Dunfey,*J.) sentenced defendant to not more than five years nor less than two years under RSA 651:6 permitting an extended term of imprisonment under certain circumstances. Defendant objected that the prosecutor made an oral recommendation of extended term of sentence rather than a written motion; that the two prior convictions relied upon as a basis for the extended term of sentence were not properly proven; and that the State had not shown by the record that the guilty pleas in the prior convictions were made after the defendant had intelligently and voluntarily waived certain pertinent constitutional rights as required by *Boykin v. Alabama,*395 U.S. 238 (1969). Defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motion to vacate the sentence based upon these objections were reserved and transferred by the trial court.

The imposition of an extended term of imprisonment upon the finding by the court that defendant had “twice previously been imprisoned, in this state or in any other jurisdiction, on sentences in excess of one year” (RSA 651:6 (c)) is not dependent upon a request from the prosecution. The objection that the State’s request for the court to impose an extended sentence was made orally rather than by written motion is therefore without merit.

In the brief of the defendant and in oral argument the claim was advanced that defendant’s prior admission that he had twice previously been imprisoned on sentences in excess of one year was incorrect. It now appears that in fact the defendant had previously been imprisoned on sentences in excess of one year in both Vermont and New Hampshire.

The defendant relies upon *Boykin v. Alabama,*395 U.S. 238 (1969), in claiming that the State was required to show from the record in the two previous convictions that the defendant intelligently and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights before pleading guilty. The reliance upon *Boykin*is unwarranted since the previous *151convictions of the defendant were both *pre-Boykin.*According to the *pre-Boykin*law, which we apply here,' the defendant bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his plea was made involuntarily and unknowingly. *St. Pierre v. Vitek,*114 N.H. 766, 769, 330 A.2d 117, 119 (1974).

*Exceptions overruled.*
#### § 167.154 Off New York: South-eastern approach.

(a) A separation zone is established bounded by a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 40°03.10′ N | 73°17.93′ W |
| 40°06.50′ N | 73°22.73′ W |
| 40°22.45′ N | 73°43.55′ W |
| 40°23.20′ N | 73°42.70′ W |
| 40°08.72′ N | 73°20.10′ W |
| 40°05.32′ N | 73°15.28′ W |

(b) A traffic lane for north-westbound traffic is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 40°08.98′ N | 73°10.87′ W |
| 40°12.42′ N | 73°15.67′ W |
| 40°24.02′ N | 73°41.97′ W |

(c) A traffic lane for south-eastbound traffic is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 40°21.82′ N | 73°44.55′ W |
| 40°02.80′ N | 73°27.15′ W |
| 39°59.43′ N | 73°22.35′ W |

[CGD 84-004, 52 FR 33589, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended by CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33365, June 19, 1997]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

TERSAUN COLE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 174 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Ronald Benn, of Validian Corporation, certify that: (1)I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, on Form 10-KSB/A, of Validian Corporation;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  (4)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: May 29, 2007  By: /s/ Ronald Benn Ronald Benn Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000001923
<NAME> ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,848,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,839,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,693
<INVENTORY>                                  1,578,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,365,987
<PP&E>                                      64,625,516
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,435,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,750,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,472,643
<BONDS>                                     40,320,190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,014,039
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,017,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,750,360
<SALES>                                     45,129,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,259,319
<CGS>                                       41,231,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               41,231,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,817,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (52,891)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,091,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                    71,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,795
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO: 22-81332-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS 

RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

TPG BOCA RA TON, LLC, 

Defendant. 

I ------------------

ORDER CLOSING CASE 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with 

Prejudice, filed November 16, 2022. (DE 22). The Court congratulates the Parties on their 

amicable resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 

677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties' Stipulation is self-executing and no Order of the Court 

is required to dismiss this action. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE TIDS CASE. 

3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

4. Each of the parties shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, except as otherwise 

agreed by the parties. 

SIGNED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida, of November, 2022. 

D ALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 9:22-cv-81332-DMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/21/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 183.562 Metallic fuel lines. ( a ) Each metallic fuel line that is mounted to the boat structure must be connected to the engine by a flexible fuel line.
( b ) Each metallic fuel line must be attached to the boat's structure within four inches of its connection to a flexible fuel line.
§ 169.1 What is the purpose of this part? This subpart prescribes the requirements for mandatory ship reporting systems. Ship reporting systems are used to provide, gather, or exchange information through radio reports. The information is used to provide data for many purposes including, but not limited to: navigation safety, maritime security and domain awareness, environmental protection, vessel traffic services, search and rescue, weather forecasting and prevention of marine pollution. Note to § 169.1 :
For ship reporting system requirements not established by the Coast Guard, see 50 CFR Part 404.
[USCG-1999-5525, 64 FR 29234, June 1, 1999, as amended by USCG-2005-22612, 73 FR 23318, Apr. 29, 2008; USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27442, June 10, 2009]
#### § 20.306 Computation of time.

(a) We compute time periods as follows:

(1) We do not include the first day of the period.

(2) If the last day of the period is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, we extend the period to the next business day.

(3) If the period is 7 days or less, we do not include Saturdays, Sundays, or Federal holidays.

(b) If you were served a document (by domestic mail) that requires or permits a response, you may add 3 days to any period for response.

(c) If you need additional time to file a response, follow the rules in these tables.

(1) You may request an extension—

| If the response period— | By— |
| --- | --- |
| Has not expired | Telephone, letter, or motion. |
| Has expired | Only by motion describing why the failure to file was excusable. |

Table 20.306(c)(1)—How to Request an Extension

(2) You file your request as follows:

| If— | Then you file your request with the— |
| --- | --- |
| An ALJ has not been assigned | Hearing Docket Clerk. |
| An ALJ has been assigned | ALJ. |
| Your case is on appeal | Hearing Docket Clerk. |

Table 20.306(c)(2)—Where to File an Extension Request
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daryl G. Brewster, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Daryl G. Brewster  
| | -----------------------
| | Daryl G. Brewster      
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 12, 2007

This certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---