43878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. 

Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes, certificated 

in any category, all serial numbers. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27: Flight Controls. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

Two reports have been received where, 

during inspection of the vertical stabilizer of 

F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes, one of the bolts 

that connect the horizontal stabilizer control 

unit actuator with the dog-links was found 

broken (one on the nut side & one on the 

head side). In both occasions, the bolt shaft 

was still present in the connection and 

therefore the horizontal stabilizer function 

was not affected. If a single dog-link 

connection fails, the complete stabilizer load 

is taken up by the remaining dog-link 

connection. * * * 

To address and correct this unsafe 

condition EASA [European Aviation Safety 

Agency] issued AD 2007–0287 

[corresponding FAA AD 2008–22–14] that 

required a one-time inspection of the affected 

bolts, * * * and replacement of failed bolts 

with serviceable parts. EASA AD 2007–0287 

also required the installation of a tie wrap 

through the lower bolts of the horizontal 

stabilizer control unit, to keep the bolt in 

place in the event of a bolt head failure. 

Recent examination revealed that the bolts 

failed due to stress corrosion, attributed to 

excessive bolt torque. Investigation of the 

recently failed bolts showed that the 

modification as required by AD 2007–0287 is 

not adequate. 

* * * * * 

Loss of horizontal stabilizer function could 

result in partial loss of control of the 

airplane. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008– 

22–14 

Actions and Compliance 

(g) Unless already done, within 6 months 

after December 26, 2008 (the effective date of 

AD 2008–22–14), do the following actions. 

(1) Perform a one-time inspection (integrity 

check) for failure of the lower bolts of the 

stabilizer control unit dog-links, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin 

SBF100–27–091, dated August 31, 2007. If a 

failed bolt is found, before further flight, 

replace the bolt with a serviceable bolt in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the service bulletin. 

(2) Install a tie-wrap through the lower 

bolts of the stabilizer control unit, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin 

SBF100–27–091, dated August 31, 2007. 

New Requirements of This AD: Actions 

(h) Within 30 months after the effective 

date of this AD, do the actions specified in 

paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 

concurrently. Accomplishing the actions of 

both paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 

terminates the actions required by paragraph 

(g) of this AD. 

(1) Remove the tie-wrap, P/N MS3367–2– 

9, from the lower bolts of the horizontal 

stabilizer control unit, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 

27, 2009. 

(2) Remove the lower bolts, P/N 23233–1, 

of the horizontal stabilizer control unit and 

install bolts, P/N 23233–3, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100–27–29, 

dated November 14, 2008. 

(i) After accomplishing the requirements of 

paragraph (h) of this AD, do not install a bolt 

having P/N 23233–1 or a tie-wrap having 

P/N MS3367–2–9. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

difference. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(j) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to Attn: Tom Rodriguez, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(k) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2009–0216, dated October 7, 2009; 

Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–27–091, 

dated August 31, 2007; Fokker Service 

Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 27, 

2009; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100– 

27–29, dated November 14, 2008; for related 

information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21, 

2010. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18399 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0864; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–202–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT 

AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; 

Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET 

FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G 

Airplanes; Model MYSTERE–FALCON 

200 Airplanes; Model MYSTERE– 

FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 

20–F5 Airplanes; Model FALCON 2000 

and FALCON 2000EX Airplanes; and 

Model MYSTERE–FALCON 50 and 

MYSTERE–FALCON 900 Airplanes, and 

FALCON 900EX Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM); 

reopening of comment period. 

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier 

NPRM for the products listed above. 

This action revises the earlier NPRM by 

expanding the scope. This proposed AD 

results from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

During maintenance on one aircraft, it was 

discovered that the overpressure capsules 

were broken on both pressurization valves. 

Failure of the pressurization control 

regulating valve (overpressure capsule) will 

affect the aircraft’s overpressure protection 

* * *. 

* * * * * 

The unsafe condition is 

overpressurization, which can result in 

injury to the occupants and possible 

structural failure leading to loss of 

control of the airplane. The proposed 

AD would require actions that are 

intended to address the unsafe 

condition described in the MCAI. 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules 43879 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by August 23, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Dassault 

Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South 

Hackensack, New Jersey 07606; 

telephone 201–440–6700; Internet 

http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced 

service information at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. 

For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 

1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2009–0864; Directorate Identifier 

2008–NM–202–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We proposed to amend 14 CFR part 

39 with an earlier NPRM for some of the 

specified products, which was 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 21, 2009 (74 FR 48021). That 

earlier NPRM proposed to require 

actions intended to address the unsafe 

condition for the products listed above. 

Since that NPRM was issued, we have 

determined that Model FAN JET 

FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G 

airplanes are also subject to the 

identified unsafe condition. We have 

revised the applicability in this 

supplemental NPRM to include these 

airplanes. 

Comments 

We have considered the following 

comments received on the earlier 

NPRM. 

Request To Extend Compliance Time 

for Certain Airplanes 

Dassault Aviation (Dassault) requests 

that we extend the compliance times in 

Table 1 of the earlier NPRM for Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 900, FALCON 

900EX, Model FALCON 2000, and 

FALCON 2000EX airplanes from 1,630 

flight hours to 1,640 flight hours. 

Dassault explains that 1,640 flight hours 

is the correct amount of time for the 

1,600-flight-hour B-check interval and 

+40-flight-hour tolerance indicated in 

the ‘‘General’’ section of each airplane’s 

Chapter 5 Maintenance Schedule. 

Dassault notes that this extended 

compliance time has been approved by 

the European Aviation Safety Agency. 

We agree, for the reasons provided by 

the commenter. We have revised Table 

1 of this supplemental NPRM 

accordingly. 

Request To Include Current 

Maintenance Procedure 

Dassault requests that we identify the 

current maintenance procedures in the 

AD. Dassault explains that later versions 

of the maintenance procedures have 

been created since the earlier NPRM 

was issued. Dassault also suggests that 

we add the phrase for Table 2 of this 

AD, ‘‘as may be amended from time to 

time by Dassault Aviation.’’ 

We partially agree. For the reasons 

provided by the commenter, we agree to 

identify the current maintenance 

procedures and have revised the 

Maintenance Procedure column of Table 

2 of this supplemental NPRM 

accordingly. We do not agree to add the 

phrase, ‘‘as may be amended from time 

to time by Dassault Aviation,’’ as it 

contradicts FAA policy. We cannot refer 

to procedures or documents in our AD 

that do not yet exist. Operators may 

request approval to use a later revision 

of the specified maintenance procedure 

as an alternative method of compliance 

with the proposed requirements under 

the provisions of paragraph (h)(1) of this 

supplemental NPRM. 

Explanation of Change Made to This 

Supplemental NPRM 

We have revised this supplemental 

NPRM to identify the legal name of the 

manufacturer as published in the most 

recent type certificate data sheet for the 

affected airplane models. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Certain changes described above 

expand the scope of the earlier NPRM. 

As a result, we have determined that it 

is necessary to reopen the comment 

period to provide additional 

opportunity for the public to comment 

on this proposed AD. 

Differences Between This AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have proposed 

different actions in this AD from those 

in the MCAI in order to follow FAA 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
43880 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

policies. Any such differences are 

highlighted in a Note within the 

proposed AD. 

Explanation of Change to Costs of 

Compliance 

Since issuance of the earlier NPRM, 

we have increased the labor rate used in 

the Costs of Compliance from $80 per 

work-hour to $85 per work-hour. The 

Costs of Compliance information, 

below, reflects this increase in the 

specified hourly labor rate. 

Costs of Compliance 

Based on the service information, we 

estimate that this proposed AD would 

affect about 1,082 products of U.S. 

registry. We also estimate that it would 

take about 1 work-hour per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on 

these figures, we estimate the cost of the 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$91,970, or $85 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this proposed AD and placed it in the 

AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2009– 

0864; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM– 

202–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by August 

23, 2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to the airplanes 

identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of 

this AD, certificated in any category. 

(1) DASSAULT AVIATION Model Falcon 

10 airplanes, Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN 

JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G 

airplanes, and Model MYSTERE-FALCON 

20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20–F5 airplanes; 

all serial numbers, equipped with Liebherr or 

ABG–Semca pressurization outflow valves. 

(2) DASSAULT AVIATION Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes, Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 50 and MYSTEREFALCON 900, and FALCON 900EX airplanes, 

and Model FALCON 2000 and FALCON 

2000EX airplanes; all serial numbers. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 21: Air Conditioning. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

‘‘During maintenance on one aircraft, it was 

discovered that the overpressure capsules 

were broken on both pressurization valves. 

Failure of the pressurization control 

regulating valve (overpressure capsule) will 

affect the aircraft’s overpressure protection 

***’’. 

* * * * * 

The unsafe condition is overpressurization, 

which can result in injury to the occupants 

and possible structural failure leading to loss 

of control of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspection and Replacement 

(g) Unless already done, do the following 

actions 

(1) Within 6 months after the effective date 

of this AD, or before reaching the applicable 

time in the ‘‘Inspection Threshold’’ column 

specified in Table 1 of this AD, whichever 

occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed the applicable time in the ‘‘Inspection 

Interval’’ column specified in Table 1 of this 

AD: Inspect for overpressure tightness on 

both regulating valves using a method 

approved by either the Manager, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European 

Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its 

delegated agent). 

TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES

Affected airplanes Inspection threshold (whichever occurs later) Inspection interval 

Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET FALCON 

SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes, and 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 

20–E5, and 20–F5 airplanes equipped with 

Liebherr or ABG–Semca valves part number 

(P/N) 209xx0xxx0x; 

Prior to the accumulation of 

1,250 total flight hours on the 

regulating valve since new.

Within 1,250 flight hours after 

the valve was cleaned in accordance with this AD.

1,250 flight hours. 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes; 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules 43881 

TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES—Continued 

Model Falcon 10 airplanes, equipped with 

Liebherr or ABG–Semca valves P/N 

209xx0xxx0x.

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes ............. Prior to the accumulation of 

1,630 total flight hours on the 

regulating valve since new.

Within 1,630 flight hours after 

the valve was cleaned in accordance with this AD.

1,630 flight hours. 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900, FALCON 

900EX (including ‘‘F900EX–EASy’’ and 

‘‘F900DX’’), Model FALCON 2000, and FALCON 2000EX (including ‘‘F2000EX–EASy’’ and 

‘‘F2000DX’’) airplanes.

Prior to the accumulation of 

1,640 total flight hours on the 

regulating valve since new.

Within 1,640 flight hours after 

the valve was cleaned in accordance with this AD.

1,640 flight hours. 

Note 1: Guidance on inspecting for 

overpressure tightness on both regulating 

valves can be found in the applicable 

airplane maintenance manual identified in 

Table 2 of this AD. 

TABLE 2—MAINTENANCE MANUAL GUIDANCE

For affected airplanes— See Dassault maintenance 

procedure— In maintenance manual— 

Model Falcon 10 airplanes, equipped with Liebherr or 

ABG–Semca valves P/N 209xx0xxx0x.

21–32–01, dated July 2009 ................. Dassault Falcon 10 Maintenance Manual. 

Model FALCON 900EX (including ‘‘F900EX–EASy’’ and 

‘‘F900DX’’) airplanes.

21–314, dated September 2008 .......... Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy Maintenance Manual. 

Model FALCON 2000 and FALCON 2000EX (including 

‘‘F2000EX–EASy’’) airplanes.

21–314, dated November 2008 ........... Dassault Falcon 2000 Maintenance Manual. 

Model FALCON F2000DX airplanes ..................................... 21–314, dated November 2008 ........... Dassault Falcon 2000DX Maintenance 

Manual. 

Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, 

D, E, F, and G airplanes,.

MYSTERE-FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, ....................................

20–E5, and 20–F5 airplanes; equipped with Liebherr or 

ABG–Semca valves part number (P/N) 209xx0xxx0x.

21–31–10, dated October 2008 ........... Dassault Fan Jet Falcon Maintenance 

Manual. 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes ............................. 21–160, dated January 2009 ............... Dassault Falcon 50/50EX Maintenance 

Manual. 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes ........................... 051.0, dated December 2008 .............. Dassault Falcon 200 Maintenance Manual. 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 airplanes ........................... 21–308, dated October 2008 ............... Dassault Falcon 900 Maintenance Manual. 

(2) If any leak is found during any 

inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of 

this AD, before further flight, replace the 

affected valve with a serviceable unit, using 

a method approved by either the Manager, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA (or 

its delegated agent). 

Note 2: Guidance on replacing regulating 

valves can be found in the applicable 

airplane maintenance manual identified in 

Table 2 of this AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI as 

follows: Although paragraph (3) of the 

compliance section of the MCAI allows flight 

in accordance with the master minimum 

equipment list (MMEL) provisions after leaks 

are found, paragraph (g)(2) of this AD 

requires replacing affected valves before 

further flight. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(h) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to Attn: Tom Rodriguez, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(i) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness 

Directive 2008–0072, dated April 18, 2008, 

for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 16, 

2010. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–18292 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1