alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of Patron  Systems,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with  respect to the report of the Company on
Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB/A Report") that:

1.       the 10-QSB/A  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information  contained in the 10-QSB/A Report fairly  presents,  in
         all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations of the Company.


Date: May 21, 2007                     /S/ BRADEN WAVERLEY
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Braden Waverley
                                       Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ODRA Mediation in Protests","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xSwqPqZut5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/11-odra-mp\/\">ODRA Mediation in Protests<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/11-odra-mp\/embed\/#?secret=xSwqPqZut5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ODRA Mediation in Protests” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"xSwqPqZut5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
7/28/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1885

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­1885

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:47 AM

To: viningd@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Vining:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015−1885).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed‐wing, rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed

UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information

can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/11/15. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80144-CR-SMITH/MAYNARD(s)(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby moves to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant 

Joff Stenn Wroy Philossaint. In support of this request, counsel would state the following:

1. Undersigned counsel was privately retained to represent the defendant in the above 

captioned cause, wherein he was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, two 

counts of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and obtaining naturalization by 

fraud.

2. Counsel represented the defendant through a change of plea to three of the four 

counts against him and went to trial on the fourth count of obtaining naturalization by 

fraud.

3. Defendant was convicted by a jury as to count four, and sentencing is pending.

4. Since the jury’s verdict, there have arisen irreconcilable differences between the 

undersigned counsel and the defendant, which have resulted in counsel’s inability to 

provide continued effective counsel to Mr. Philossaint.

5. Counsel therefore must move to withdraw from further representation in this matter.

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

6. Counsel has discussed this mater with Mr. Philossaint, who advised that he is unable 

to retain private counsel. As such, it is requested that the Court appoint counsel to 

represent him in this matter.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been electronically filed and served on 

counsel for all parties via CM/ECF this 22nd day of February 2023. Counsel has also provided a 

copy of this motion to the defendant via U.S. Mail on this same date.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF IAN GOLDSTEIN P.A.

Counsel for Defendant Philossaint

330 Clematis Street, Suite 209

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Tel: (561) 600-0950

Email: ian@iangoldsteinlaw.com

/s/ Ian J. Goldstein

IAN J. GOLDSTEIN, ESQUIRE

Florida Bar No. 0085219

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11


                              AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                         ---------------------
                                                           1997          1996
                                                         -------       -------
                                                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                                      <C>           <C>    
COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME:
  Net income for primary earnings per
    common share                                         $ 1,152       $   651
  Add:  Debenture interest and amortization
    expense, net of income taxes                             104           122
                                                         -------       -------
  Adjusted net income for fully diluted
    earnings per common share                            $ 1,256       $   773
                                                         =======       =======

COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
 SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Weighted average shares outstanding                     12,747        12,331
  Add:  Effect of options and warrants outstanding         1,627         1,152
                                                         -------       -------
  Weighted average shares and common share
    equivalents used for computation of primary
    earnings per common share                             14,374        13,483
  Add:  Effect of additional options and warrants
    outstanding for fully diluted computation                443            --
  Add:  Shares assumed to be issued upon
    conversion of debentures                               1,552         1,775
                                                         -------       -------
  Weighted average shares and common share
    equivalents used for computation of fully
    diluted earnings per common share                     16,369        15,258
                                                         =======       =======


NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE AND COMMON
 SHARE EQUIVALENT:
  Primary                                                $   .08       $   .05
                                                         =======       =======
  Fully diluted                                          $   .08       $   .05
                                                         =======       =======
</TABLE>
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Ch.02 – ADR in Business

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Ch.02 – ADR in Business Ch.02 – ADR in BusinessADR2022-02-19T09:15:08-05:00
			
			Ch.02 – ADR in BusinessMany private sector commercial firms favor using ADR in order to:
Maintain or improve business relationships with clients, suppliers, employees, etc.
Achieve outcomes considered fair or that make business sense
Reduce the overall cost associated with the dispute processThese goals and outcomes have been the subject of academic studies and surveys. The American Arbitration Association, for example, studied corporate attitudes regarding the use of arbitration and mediation, and published its findings in a report entitled Dispute-Wise Business Management: Improving Economic and Non-Economic Outcomes in Managing Business Conflicts (2006).  A Harris Poll sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce yielded similar attitudes regarding arbitration that were published in a report called Arbitration: Simpler, Cheaper, and Faster than Litigation (2005).
Parties to a federal contract or business transaction also are concerned about outcomes, time, and resources relating to protests or contract disputes.  Rather than merely focusing on the bottom line of a balance sheet, the federal contracting community may find that compliance with agency policy or regulations requires serious consideration of using ADR.  Further, the mission of the agency or office might be achieved best through a negotiated solution that goes beyond what a court or agency board can order in the adjudication process.  Business-sense means mission-sense more often than not. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
#### Mrs. J. L. VANCE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS, Appellee.

No. 13479.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1958.

J. Victor Barr, Jr., Jack Norman, Sr., and John C. Askew, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.

Joseph G. Cummings of Howard, Davis, Boult & Hunt, Nashville, Tenn., for appellee.

Before MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After consideration of the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and the record in the case, we have reached the conclusion that United States District Judge Miller was correct in dismissing this action upon the basis of his findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion.

Upon that basis, the judgment of the United States District Court is ordered to be affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4957 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4957

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 extend the legislative authority for the Black Patriots Foundation to 
                     establish a commemorative work.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 506 of the 
Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 
note; 110 Stat. 4155) is amended by striking ``2000'' and inserting 
``2005''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.436 Chef Menteur Pass.

The draw of the U.S. Highway 90 bridge, mile 2.8, at Lake Catherine, shall open on signal; except that, from 5:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., Monday through Friday except Federal holidays, the draw need open only on the hour and on the half-hour for the passage of vessels. The draw shall open at any time for a vessel in distress.

[CGD08-01-005, 66 FR 11110, Feb. 22, 2001]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned, Alexander Anderson, the Chief Financial Officer of
American Stellar Energy Inc. (Formerly Merchantpark Communications Inc.). (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 21st
day of October, 2004.


                                   By:  /s/ Alexander Anderson
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Alexander Anderson
                                        Chief Financial Officer
FORM A

IJM TED STATESDISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.22-cv-81294-AM C

' ' * =f> X

FILcU.D BY=' 'r -Lj.(),.'j

- - t

t:

k(.

AtJ62322u's'',u' k.

ANGELAE.NOBLj i:

CLERKU.S.DISX Ct' :.

S.D.OFFLA.-FXL!t,tso,

- - .

lntheM atteroftheSearchof

M ar-a-Lago

1100S.OceanBlvd.

Palm Beach,FL 33480

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING

PleasetakenoticethattheforegoingM otiontoAppeaçproHacF/c,forJamesM .Trusty,

i ConsenttoDesignation,andRequesttoElectronicallyReceiveNoticesofElectronicFiling(the

RMotion''lisbeing filed conventionally becalzseatechnicalissuewith accesstotheCourt's

CM/ECF system precluded electronic filing today, and the CM /ECF Help Desk advised

tmdersignedcotmseltofileconventionally.

Dated:August23,2022 Respectfullysubmitted,

/s/LindseyHalligan

LindseyHalligan

FloridaBarNo.109481

51lSE 51 Avenue

FortLauderdale,FL 33301

Emnil:lindseyhaligan@outlook.com

/s/JamesM .Trtzstv

Jam esM .Trusty

IfrahLaw PLLC

1717PennsylvaniaAve.N.W .Suite650

W ashington,DC 20006

Telephone:(202)524-4176

Email:jtrusty@ifrahlam com

+roàccvicesledcontemporaneously)

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2022 Page 1 of 2
/s/M .EvanCorcoran

M .EvanCorcoran

SILVERMANITHOMPSONISLUTIUNIWHITE,LLC

400EastPrattStreet-Suite900

Baltimore,M D 21202

Telephone:(410)385-2225

Email:ecorcorr@silve= rthompson.com

+rohacvicenledcontemporaneously)

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 110.54 Long Island Sound, on west side of entrance to Pataguanset River, Conn.

An area east of Giants Neck (formerly known as Grant Neck) described as follows: Beginning at a point bearing 114°, 75 feet, from the outer end of the breakwater at the south end of Giants Neck; thence 90°, 1,050 feet; thence 22°17′30′′, 2,140 feet; thence 283°- 27′15.5′′, 240 feet; thence 220°36′39′′, 1,252.6 feet; thence 295°23′16.5′′, 326.5 feet; thence 269°02′42.6′′, 240 feet; thence 261°46′50.9′′, 181.9 feet; thence 226°28′07.7′′, 275.9 feet; thence 147°43′27.7′′, 449.4 feet; thence 238°01′35.8′′, 379.6 feet; and thence approximately 156°31′05.8′′, 462.11 feet, to the point of beginning.
§ 207.600 Rochester (Charlotte) Harbor, N.Y.; use, administration, and navigation. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) No vessel shall moor or anchor to any structure of the United States without the consent of the District Engineer, U.S. Army, in charge of the locality, or his authorized agent.
( d ) No vessel shall moor or anchor in or along any improved channel or basin in such manner as to interfere with improvement or maintenance operations therein. Whenever in the opinion of the District Engineer any vessel is so moored or anchored, the owner thereof shall cause said vessel to be moved upon notification from and within the time specified by said District Engineer.
[Regs., May 5, 1938, as amended at 25 FR 8908, Sept. 16, 1960; 42 FR 57962, Nov. 7, 1977]
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.93 Independent supporting.

The device must have provisions for supporting that are independent from connecting pipes.
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 100-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2023 Page 9 of 9
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4811 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4811

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  Making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and 
related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

    Section 101. (a) The provisions of H.R. 5526 of the 106th Congress, 
as introduced on October 24, 2000, are hereby enacted into law.
    (b) In publishing this Act in slip form and in the United States 
Statutes at Large pursuant to section 112 of title 1, United States 
Code, the Archivist of the United States shall include after the date 
of approval at the end an appendix setting forth the text of the bill 
referred to in subsection (a) of this section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 23.05 Where and when displayed. ( a ) The Coast Guard Ensign is a mark of authority and is required to be displayed whenever a Coast Guard vessel takes active measures in connection with boarding, examining, seizing, stopping or heaving to of a vessel for the purposes of enforcing the laws of the United States. The distinctive markings of Coast Guard aircraft serve the same purpose.
( b ) The Coast Guard Commission pennant indicates a Coast Guard cutter under the command of a commissioned officer or commissioned warrant officer.
( c ) When applicable, these distinctive marks shall be displayed, the Coast Guard Ensign at the masthead of the foremast, and the commission pennant at the after masthead. On ships having but one mast the Coast Guard Ensign and commission pennant shall be at the masthead on the same halyard. In mastless ships they shall be displayed from the most conspicuous hoist.
[CGFR 67-26, 32 FR 6576, Apr. 28, 1967]
Exhibit 32


                                       29
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 32

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      Barry E. Backhaus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and
Colin D. Anderson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First
Federal Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his capacity as an
officer of the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") and that to
the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


February 13, 2004              /s/ Barry E. Backhaus
Date                           -----------------------------------------------
                               Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


February 13, 2004              /s/ Colin D. Anderson
Date                           -----------------------------------------------
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


                                       30