alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Pre-Dispute ADR","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Do5BIl5oC1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/16-pre-dispute\/\">Pre-Dispute ADR<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/16-pre-dispute\/embed\/#?secret=Do5BIl5oC1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Pre-Dispute ADR” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"Do5BIl5oC1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### § 238.10 Coordination with other Federal agencies.

In conducting flood damage reduction studies, reporting officers shall comply with the 1965 Agreement between the Soil Conservation Service and the Corps (contained in EP 1165-2-2) in determining the responsible Federal agency. Corps personnel should also keep abreast of the public works programs administered by other Federal agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Farmers Home Administration and the Department of Commerce, in order to coordinate flood control improvements with storm sewer system improvements and to avoid program overlap. Coordination of planning activities with A-95 clearinghouses will help to achieve this objective (see ER 1105-2-811).
COTTON AND WOOL OUTLOOK CWS-0499 (PDF)       
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This report is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831.  The report was released in
ASCII format on May 13, 1999.

Electronic release only; no printed copies are available.

Please note that this publication is in .PDF format and 40.8 KB in size.
Acrobat Reader 3.0 or later is required to view and print this document.
The Adobe Acrobat .PDF format is used to preserve all the layout and
content used in the original publication. To download and get help using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, please go to:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

For More Information on ERS Publications and Data
*************************************************
Visit the ERS web site at:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov

Other reports are available from the Products and Services
area on the ERS web site from:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/periodic.htm

For sales information on ERS publications, go to:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/sales.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
END_OF_FILE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

November 9, 2004


Aceto Corporation
Lake Success, New York

RE:     Registration Statements (No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929 and No. 333-110653)
        on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 9, 2004 related to our
review of interim financial information for the three months ended September 30,
2004.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


Melville, New York                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
Administration for Community Living

Policy Review of ACL Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs)

2018

The purpose of this review process is to promote a clear and consistent message through our FOAs in terms of how each funding announcement promotes the overarching ACL mission and vision.  While program staff will use their expertise to ensure that the FOA meets the intent of the appropriation from which it comes, CPE will examine whether the overall language reflects ACL’s policy priorities and emphasis on measuring progress toward FOA goals.

Based on mission, vision, and goals of ACL here are seven questions that the policy review team will use as guide in reviewing FOAs. These questions will be applied only when appropriate as we recognize statutory, regulatory, and funding restrictions within which ACL programs operate. 

**Five Pillars**

Does the FOA address one of the Assistant Secretary’s five pillars?

· Connecting people to services

· Protecting rights and preventing abuse

· Expanding employment opportunities

· Strengthening the networks

· Supporting families and caregivers

**Person-centeredness/Self-direction and Consumer Control**

Does the FOA promote choice and control for older adults and persons of any age (including children) with a disability?

**Community Living**

Does the FOA promote community integration and community living for older adults, persons of any age (including children) with a disability, and their families? 

**Quality**

Does the FOA promote evidence-based, high quality services and systems?

**Sustainability**

Does the FOA require grantees or contractors to use their learnings to develop a business case, and sustainability and dissemination plans for successful programs and services?****

**Performance**

Does the FOA provide enough detailed information to help applicants think critically about the measures they should include in their applications to effectively measure their progress towards meeting the goals outlined in the FOA?

Version January 2017
KJD/

z:3/ZOlt J ^^.^' - ^ U ^ZDDUHO D Hr- , ij u I <i;r r, HVX H I lui i rH« t a± / o i

( r v • \ r : rV i 1 r: \ 1 1 !/ /
OFFIC E O F TH E COMMISSIONE R SEA NPARNELL , GOVERNO R 411 1 Aviatio n Driv e P O Box 19S90 0 ANCHORAGE , ALASK A 99519-690 0 FAX : (907 ) 269-046 9 PHONB : (907 ) 269-073 0 Jun e 30 , 201 0 Mr . Denni s DeVan

y Chie f EAS an d Donnesti cAnalysi s U S Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Wasliington , D C 2059 0 U RE : DOT-OST-2002-1201 4 DOT-OST-2008-021 7 Dea rIVIr . DeVany , Thi s lette ri s t o expres s suppor t fo rth e continuatio n o f Essentia l Ai rServic e (EAS ) progra m i n Alask a an d th e critica l transportatio n connectio n i t bring s t o ou rmos t remot e communities . Bot h Excursio n Inle t an d Kake communitie s lac k o f an yroa d syste m connection . Thi s subsidize d ai rservic e i s th e onl yfor m o f schedule d transportatio n t o Excursio n Inlet . Kake doe s hav e schedule d marin e ferryservic e fou rday s pe rweek . Bot h communitie s o f Excursio n Inle t an d Kake depen d o n schedule d ai rfreight , passenge ran d mai l servic e fo rbasi cnecessities , routin e medica l an d healt h services , an d economi cweltare . Th e Stat e o f Alask a believe s loca l resident s ar e bes t positione d t o commen t o n particula rschedule s o rai rcarrier s an d therefor e w e leav e thos e specifi carea s fo r th e communityresponse . I respectfull yurg e USDO T t o suppor t an d continu e th e EA S servic e a t Excursio n Inle t an d Kake . Sincerely , uike n ^y ^ DeputyCommissione ro f Aviatio n "Providing/o r

th e saf e mtivement

o f peopl e and^ood aan dth e delivery o f stat e services
-
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.753 Regulated navigation area; Tampa Bay, Florida. ( a ) The following is a regulated navigation area (RNA): All the navigable waters of Tampa Bay, Hillsborough Bay and Old Tampa Bay, including all navigable waterways tributary thereto. Also included are the waters of Egmont Channel, Gulf of Mexico from Tampa Bay, Tampa Bay Entrance, approximate position (27°35.2′ N, 083°00.4′ W).
( b ) The master, pilot, or person in charge of any vessel of 50 meters or greater shall give a Navigational Advisory Broadcast in accordance with 47 CFR 80.331 on VHF-FM channel 13 at the following broadcast/reporting points: ( 1 ) Prior to getting underway from any berth or anchorage;
( 2 ) Prior to entering Egmont Channel from seaward;
( 3 ) Prior to passing Egmont Key in any direction;
( 4 ) Prior to transiting the Skyway Bridge in either direction;
( 5 ) Prior to transiting the intersection of Tampa Bay Cut F Channel, Tampa Bay Cut G Channel, and Gadsden Point Cut Channel;
( 6 ) Prior to anchoring or approaching a berth for docking;
( 7 ) Prior to tending hawser;
( 8 ) Prior to transiting Point Pinellas Channel Light 1 in either direction.
( c ) Each Navigational Advisory required by this section shall be made in the English language and will contain the following information: ( 1 ) The words “Hello all vessels, a Navigational Advisory follows”;
( 2 ) Name of vessel;
( 3 ) If engaged in towing, the nature of the tow;
( 4 ) Direction of Movement;
( 5 ) Present location; and,
( 6 ) The nature of any hazardous conditions as defined by 33 CFR 160.202.
( d ) Nothing in this section shall supersede the Navigational Rules (COLREGS and their associated Annexes and Inland Navigation Rules (33 CFR subchapter E)), as applicable, or relieve the Master or person in charge of the vessel of responsibility for the safe navigation of the vessel.
[CGD07-94-094, 60 FR 58519, Nov. 28, 1995, as amended by USCG-2005-21869, 80 FR 5336, Jan. 30, 2015; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44286, July 27, 2015; USCG-2022-0962, 89 FR 16695, Mar. 8, 2024]
**Exhibit 32(f)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southern Power Company. |

 

 

|   | /s/Ronnie L. Bates

Ronnie L. Bates

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Michael W. Southern

Michael W. Southern

Senior Vice President, Treasurer and

Chief Financial Officer

  |

 

 

August 6, 2009
§ 401.97 Closing procedures and ice navigation. ( a ) No wintering vessel shall return downbound through the Montreal-Lake Ontario Section of the Seaway in the same navigation season in which it entered the Seaway unless the transit is authorized by the Corporation and the Manager.
( b ) No vessel shall transit the Montreal-Lake Ontario Section of the Seaway during the closing period in a navigation season unless ( 1 ) It reports at the applicable calling in point referred to in paragraph (c) of this section on or before the clearance date in that navigation season; or
( 2 ) It reports at the applicable calling in point referred to in paragraph (c) of this section within a period of 96 hours after the clearance date in that navigation season, it complies with the provisions of the agreement between Canada and the United States, known as the St. Lawrence Seaway Tariff of Tolls and the transit is authorized by the Corporation and the Manager.
( c ) For the purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, the calling in point is, ( 1 ) In the case of an upbound vessel, Cape St. Michel; and
( 2 ) In the case of a downbound vessel, Cape Vincent.
( d ) No vessel shall transit the Montreal-Lake Ontario Section of the Seaway after the period of 96 hours referred to in paragraph (b)(2) of this section unless the transit is authorized by the Corporation and the Manager.
( e ) Every vessel that, during a closing period, enters the Montreal-Lake Ontario Section of the Seaway, upbound or downbound, or departs upbound from any port, dock, wharf or anchorage in that Section shall, ( 1 ) At the time of such entry or departure, report to the nearest Seaway station the furthermost destination of the vessel's voyage and any intermediate destinations within that Section; and
( 2 ) At the time of any change in those destinations, report such changes to the nearest Seaway station.
( f ) Where ice conditions restrict navigation, ( 1 ) No upbound vessel that has a power to length ratio of less than 24:1 (kW/meter) and a forward draft of less than 50 dm, and
( 2 ) No downbound vessel that has a power to length ratio of less than 15:1 (kW/meter) and a forward draft of less than 25 dm shall transit between the St. Lambert Lock and the Iroquois Lock of the Montreal-Lake Ontario Section of the Seaway and CIP 15 and CIP 16 of the Welland Canal.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[47 FR 51124, Nov. 12, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 20691, May 9, 1983; 48 FR 39934, Sept. 2, 1983; 65 FR 52915, Aug. 31, 2000; 74 FR 18995, Apr. 27, 2009]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Douglas Roth
----------------
Douglas Roth
Chief Financial Officer
February 9, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-14054-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DUSTIN SINGLETON,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard on Defendant Singleton’s Expedited Motion to Compel 

Discovery [ECF No. 87]. On February 3, 2023, Magistrate Judge Maynard held an Evidentiary 

Hearing on the Expedited Motion to Compel Discovery [ECF No. 68]. The Court has reviewed 

the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 87], the Government’s Notice of No Objections to the 

Report [ECF No. 88], Defendant’s Objections to the Report [ECF No. 90], and the full record. 

Following such review, including Defendant’s Objections [ECF No. 90] and Magistrate Judge’s 

credibility determinations as stated in the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 87] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. The Expedited Motion to Compel [ECF No. 68] is DENIED AS MOOT and/or 

otherwise DENIED for the sound reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation 

[ECF No. 87].

Case 2:22-cr-14054-AMC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-14054-CR-CANNON

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 27th day of February

2023.

_________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 2:22-cr-14054-AMC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 2 of 2
YEAR 1 

COMMUNICATIONS 

REPORT

The Nutrition and Aging Resource Center has a long-term goal to support the national aging network, former and future 

Innovations in Nutrition (INNU) grantees, and other Older Americans Act (OAA) stakeholder organizations in the development 

and expansion of nutrition programs in their states and communities. The objectives include 1) Providing high-quality and 

branded electronic and print resources for the national Senior Nutrition Program (SNP) network to develop impactful, costeffective and person-centered services that align with the purposes of the OAA Title IIIC; 2) Providing high-quality, tiered and 

responsive technical assistance to ACL and INNU grantees, and 3) Providing national leadership by acting as an advocate for 

the SNP to ensure the network’s continued strength and sustainability. This report details the communications outcomes of 

year one of the grant, October 1st, 2021-August 31, 2022.

Social media channels were launched in late October 2021 

and regular postings on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, 

and Pinterest started in November. Videos were added to 

the YouTube channel in December, and the Nutrition and 

Aging Resource Center started to branch out into TikTok

more in early 2022. 

The Nutrition and Aging Resource Center sends two 

newsletters per month on the second Tuesday and fourth 

Thursday of each month. The first newsletter shares top 

nutrition news for the network. The second newsletter 

coined, “The Final Forkful,” sends announcements and “in 

case you missed it” information. 

A “Network Spotlight” was introduced in the newsletters 

to highlight people and organizations doing fantastic 

things in the nutrition and aging network. A brief recorded 

interview is added to the newsletter and YouTube playlist.

During the ten months, the Nutrition and Aging Resource 

Center’s social media presence reached approximately 

103,133 duplicated individuals through video views, website 

visits, newsletters and social media reaches. 

The goal for year two is to reach at least 150,000 individuals 

on the same platforms. This is an achievable goal and will 

be met through the same communication channels that 

were implemented during year one.

Communications Reach by Month

Communications Reach by Platform

Facebook Demographics by Age - Men

Facebook Demographics by Age - Women

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human 

Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and 

conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
-cr-06024-PAS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2000 P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4892 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4892

      To repeal the Federal charter of the Boy Scouts of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2000

Ms. Woolsey (for herself, Mr. Stark, Ms. Lee, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Nadler, 
Ms. Velazquez, and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the Federal charter of the Boy Scouts of America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scouting for All Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) Federal charters are prestigious distinctions awarded 
        to organizations with a patriotic, charitable, or educational 
        purpose.
            (2) Although intended as an honorific title, a Federal 
        charter implies Government support for such organizations.
            (3) In 1916, the Federal Government granted a Federal 
        charter to the Boy Scouts of America.
            (4) Although the Boy Scouts of America promotes the social 
        and civic development of young boys through mentoring, it also 
        sets an example of intolerance through its discriminatory 
        policy regarding sexual orientation.
            (5) Federal support for the Boy Scouts of America 
        indirectly supports the organization's policy to exclude 
        homosexuals.
            (6) A policy of excluding homosexuals is contradictory to 
        the Federal Government's support for diversity and tolerance 
        and should not be condoned as patriotic, charitable, or 
        educational.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF FEDERAL CHARTER OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA.

    (a) Repeal.--Chapter 309 of title 36, United States Code, which 
grants a Federal charter to the Boy Scouts of America, is repealed.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis at the beginning of subtitle 
II of title 36, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to chapter 309.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 169.102 Who is the shore-based authority?

The U.S. Coast Guard is the shore-based authority for these mandatory ship reporting systems.