alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99
PRESS RELEASE - THIRD QUARTER RESULTS

CONTACT:
  Richard Becht
  (716) 655-3800

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


          ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION REPORTS THIRD QUARTER RESULTS

     EAST AURORA, N.Y., April 20, 1999 -- Acme Electric Corporation (NYSE:
ACE) announced today that, for the third quarter ended April 3, 1999, net
sales were $19,100,000 with net income of $762,000, or $.15 per share,
compared with sales of $22,352,000 and net income of $585,000, or $.12 per
share, for the comparable period last year.
     Sales for the thirty-nine-week period ending April 3, 1999, were
$60,281,000, resulting in net income of $1,686,000, or $.33 per share,
compared with sales of $67,283,000 with net income of $1,253,000, or $.25
per share for the comparable period of the previous year.
     Robert J. McKenna, Chairman and CEO, stated that, "The loss of Cisco,
a major customer in our electronics business, continues to depress sales.
We are taking all of the necessary actions to minimize the earnings impact
of this change.  New programs under development should begin to produce
improved sales near the end of the calendar year."
     Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the design
and manufacture of power conversion equipment for electronic and electrical
systems for industrial, commercial, residential, and military and aerospace
applications.  Corporate headquarters are in East Aurora, N.Y., with
operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C., and Tempe, Ariz.
                                  # # # #

<PAGE>

ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Comparative Analysis
(in thousands, except per share data)


                                13 Weeks Ended      39 Weeks Ended
                                --------------      --------------
                              04/03/99  03/28/98  04/03/99  03/28/98
                              --------  --------  --------  --------

Net Sales                      $19,100   $22,352   $60,281   $67,283

Net Income                        $762      $585    $1,686    $1,253

Net Income Per Common Share
  (Basic and Diluted)             $.15      $.12      $.33      $.25

Weighted Average Number of Shares
  Outstanding Used to Compute
  Income Per Common Share:
    Basic                        5,061     5,048     5,057     5,045
    Diluted                      5,097     5,060     5,084     5,059


Company news is available by FAX: dial 1-800-758-5804, and input
extension 006675; or visit our web site at acmeelec.com
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1




                                  May 17, 2004



Aceto Corporation
Lake Success, New York

Re:    Registration Statement for Aceto Corporation on
       Form S-8 dated November 20, 2003


With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our reports dated February 9, 2004 and May 6, 2004 related
to our review of interim financial information for the periods ended December
31, 2003 and March 31, 2004, respectively.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such reports
are not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or reports prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACMAT Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry W. Nozko,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

         /s/ Henry W. Nozko, Jr.

         Henry W. Nozko, Jr.
         Chief Executive Officer
         November 14, 2003
§ 20.309 Motions. ( a ) A person may apply for an order or ruling not specifically provided for in this subpart, but shall apply for it by motion. Each written motion must comply with the requirements of this subpart for form, filing, and service. Each motion must state clearly and concisely— ( 1 ) Its purpose, and the relief sought;
( 2 ) Any statutory or regulatory authority; and
( 3 ) The facts constituting the grounds for the relief sought.
( b ) A proposed order may accompany a motion.
( c ) Each motion must be in writing; except that one made at a hearing will be sufficient if stated orally upon the record, unless the ALJ directs that it be reduced to writing.
( d ) Except as otherwise required by this part, a party shall file any response to a written motion 10 days or less after service of the motion. When a party makes a motion at a hearing, an oral response to the motion made at the hearing is timely.
( e ) Unless the ALJ orders otherwise, the filing of a motion does not stay a proceeding.
( f ) The ALJ will rule on the record either orally or in writing. She or he may summarily deny any dilatory, repetitive, or frivolous motion.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Terms of Use","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gVitvqJGYe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/terms-of-use\/\">Terms of Use<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/terms-of-use\/embed\/#?secret=gVitvqJGYe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Terms of Use” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"gVitvqJGYe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-80800-MIDDLEBROOKS

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

WESLOFT LLC, a Florida limited

liability company,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant WESLOFT LLC as to all of his claims 

in this action with prejudice, with the parties to bear his/their own costs and attorney’s fees. 

Dated: July 22, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 North Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351-7919 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com 

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 014659

Case 9:22-cv-80800-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 245.30 Identification of responsible parties. ( a ) *Investigation.* When marking or removal are determined to be appropriate remedial action and no emergency situation exists, the District Engineer will investigate to determine the owner or, if the owner cannot be determined, the lessee or operator. If cargo is involved, ownership will be separately determined.
( b ) *Notification.* If the owner or other responsible party can be determined, the District Engineer and/or the Coast Guard will send a notice, via certified mail, advising them of their legal obligation to mark (referencing Coast Guard requirements) and to remove the obstruction, and of the legal consequences for failure to do so, with a request for prompt reply of intent.
( c ) *Public notice.* If the owner or responsible party cannot be determined from investigation, the District Engineer will publish a legal advertisement in a newspaper nearest the location of the obstruction and in a newspaper of at least 25,000 circulation, addressed “To Whom It May Concern,” requiring removal by the owner, lessee or operator. The advertisement will be published at least once a week for 30 days.
webform-submission-form form--inline clearfix {background-color: rgba(151, 196, 235, 0.15);}
#### § 169.115 Where is the southeastern reporting system located?

Geographical boundaries of the southeastern area include coastal waters within about 25 nautical miles (45 kilometer) along a 90-nautical mile (170-kilometer) stretch of the Atlantic seaboard in Florida and Georgia. The area coordinates (NAD 83) extends from the shoreline east to longitude 80°51.6′ W with the southern and northern boundaries at latitude 30°00′ N and 31°27′ N, respectively.
§ 207.610 St. Lawrence River, Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y.; use, administration, and navigation of the harbor and U.S. breakwater. ( a ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Vessels shall observe the following rule in mooring to the breakwater: The first self-propelled vessel stopping at the harbor for shelter will proceed to the upstream end of the breakwater and moor along either side of it. All similar vessels entering later will place themselves in a compact position close to those preceding them. Passenger vessels will, in general, have preference as to location of moorage. Sailing craft will so locate themselves that they will not lie in the way of other vessels entering the harbor. All vessels of every description will place themselves so as not to interfere with any work of reconstruction or repair that may be in progress at the time.
( e ) The use of chains in making fast to the breakwater is prohibited. Lines must be attached to the snubbing posts only, and outboard anchors taken in.
( f ) Vessels with other craft in tow will, if practicable, at once, moor them compactly along the breakwater, either taking in the towlines or placing the slack in them upon the breakwater in such a manner as not to interfere with other vessels. If necessary to moor alongside of other vessels moored to the breakwater, the towlines shall be taken in or disposed of in such a manner as not to interfere with the departure of vessels moored between them and the breakwater.
( g ) Vessels of every description mooring to the breakwater, must place suitable fenders between themselves and the breakwater to protect the timber walings on the breakwater from damage.
( h ) The unloading of freight of any class upon the breakwater is expressly prohibited, except in accordance with special permission from the said District Engineer or his representative.
( i ) Each and every vessel made fast to the breakwater, or anchored in the harbor without a line made fast to the shore or shore dock, must have at least one experienced person upon it during the entire time said vessel is thus moored in the harbor.
[Regs., May 6, 1938, as amended at 25 FR 8908, Sept. 16, 1960; 42 FR 57962, Nov. 7, 1977]
#### § 167.3 Geographic coordinates.

Geographic coordinates are defined using North American 1927 Datum (NAD 27) unless indicated otherwise.

[CGD 90-039, 59 FR 21937, Apr. 28, 1994]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Coalition History","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8AS224OwPa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/coalition-history\/\">Coalition History<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/coalition-history\/embed\/#?secret=8AS224OwPa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Coalition History” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"8AS224OwPa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
NO. 07-06-0388-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 13, 2006

______________________________

JOSEPH STEWART, III, APPELLANT

V.

ANTHONY HOLMES, ET AL., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 87TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANDERSON COUNTY;

NO. 87-10358; HONORABLE DEBORAH OAKES EVANS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Joseph Stewart, III, an inmate proceeding pro se, perfected this appeal

from the trial court’s order dismissing his suit for denial of postage which he alleged was

in violation of his constitutional rights. The clerk’s record was filed on October 9, 2006.

Stewart’s brief was due to be filed on November 8, 2006, but has yet to be filed. Also, no
2

motion for extension of time has been filed. By letter from the Clerk of this Court dated

November 14, 2006, Stewart was notified of the defect and directed to file by November

28, 2006, either his brief or a response reasonably explaining the failure to do so. Stewart

was further directed to show that Appellees, Anthony Holmes, et al., have not been

significantly injured by the delay. The Court noted that failure to comply might result in

dismissal pursuant to Rule 38.8(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Stewart did

not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply

with a notice from the Clerk of this Court requiring a response or other action in a specified

time. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b) and (c).

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
**                                        Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-52-037]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Refund 
Report

June 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 26, 2000, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, 
Inc. (Williams), tendered for filing its report of activities regarding 
collection of Kansas ad valorem taxes.
    Williams states that this filing is being made in compliance with 
Commission order issued September 10, 1997 in Docket Nos. RP97-397-000, 
et al. The September 10 order requires first sellers to make refunds 
for the period October 3, 1983 through June 28, 1988. The Commission 
also directed that pipelines file a report annually concerning their 
activities to collect and flow through refunds of the taxes at issue.
    Williams states that a copy of its filing was served on all parties 
included on the official service list maintained by the Secretary in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
on or before June 8, 2000. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-
208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14230 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Jeffrey M. Harper FAA Office ofRegional Counsel 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 T (425) 227-2161 F (425) 227-1007 Todd C. Emerson SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. George, Utah 84790 T (435) 634-3530 F (435) 634-3505

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

# RECEIVE]) APR- 42017 

# HEARING**DOCK~lr**

FAA DOCKET NOs:**2012N~060030;2014VVP910006;2012N~060029;2012N~060123;2013N~060083;and** 2015VVP910079**FD~S** NOs: FAA-2014-0322; FAA-2014-0686; FAA-2014-0809; FAA-2014-0810; FAA-2014- 0811; FAA-2016-4267 The Honorable Douglas**~-** Rawald
COMPLAINANT & RESPONDENT'S JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CASES Pursuant to a settlement agreement reached bythe parties, Complainant and Respondent file thisjoint notice to withdraw the pending six cases before this forum. I. On**~arch** 31, 2016, the partiesjointly moved to stay the proceedings in these
cases. 2. By severaljoint motions ofthe parties, the above-referenced cases have been stayed while the parties negotiated a settlement. 3. On**~arch** 30, 2017, the parties signed a settlement agreement resolving the above-referenced cases.Accordingly, by and through undersigned counsel, Complainant and Respondent hereby withdraw the pending cases before this forum.

FOR THE FAA:

.";l 

### JEFFREY MHARPER /i 2017.04.03



## '-:t::-'----:-:-:c:----fQill!l:26:39 -07'00' Jeffrey M. Harper Attorney for Complainant

Dated: April 3, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

Todd C. Emerson Attorney for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing COMPLAINANT & RESPONDENT'S JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CASES has been served via E-mail and Federal Express to the following:
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591



# Datedthis~dayof Upr:[ ,2017.