alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

JOSE GARCIA, individually, and on ) 

behalf of all others similarly situated, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:22-cv-22767 

) 

 v. ) 

) 

TURNER ACCEPTANCE, CORP. and ) 

JOHN DOES 1-10, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDING PENDING ARBITRATION

Plaintiff, Jose Garcia (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Turner Acceptance, Corp. (“Turner 

Acceptance”), agree that Plaintiff’s claims are subject to an arbitration agreement. Therefore, 

the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order staying all proceedings in this case 

pending arbitration pursuant to that arbitration agreement. 

Dated: September 29, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

JOSE GARCIA

By: /s/ Alexander J. Taylor

Alexander J. Taylor, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 1013947 

SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.

2500 South Highland Avenue 

Suite 200 

Lombard, Illinois 60148 

(630) 575-8180 

ataylor@sulaimanlaw.com

TURNER ACCEPTANCE, CORP.

By: /s/ Buffey E. Klein 

Buffey E. Klein 

Florida Bar No. 0034639 

HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP

1900 N. Pearl Street, Suite 1800 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 999-6100 

Facsimile: (214) 999-6170 

buffey.klein@huschblackwell.com

Case 1:22-cv-22767-BB Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned certifies that on this 29th day of September, 2022, a copy of the 

foregoing document was filed using the CM/ECF system, which sent notifications of such filing 

to all counsel of record. 

 

/s/ Buffey E. Klein 

Case 1:22-cv-22767-BB Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 181.35 Removal of numbers.

No person may remove or alter a number required by this subpart unless authorized by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard.
United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA-MIAMI DIVISION

DELIO BATISITA,

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ,

and RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE, INC., REINIER CORTES and 

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA

 PRESIDING JUDGE

HONORABLE 

CECILIA M. 

ALTONAGA

PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY 

FAIRLAW FIRM

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Toussaint Cummings, Esq.

135 San Lorenzo Ave

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY

CUETO LAW GROUP P.L.

Santiago Cueto Esq., 

Daniel Tropp, Esq. 

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 

Suite 470 Coral Gables, FL 33146 

 TRIAL DATE(S)

July 3, 2023 COURT REPORTER COURTROOM DEPUTY

PLF. 

NO

LIVE or BY 

DEPOSITION

ADDRESS WITNESSES

1 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Delio Batista (Needs Interpreter)

2 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Marina Lopez 

3 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Carlos Lopez 

4 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Rafaela Valiente 

5 Live Christopher Vasquez

6 Live c/o Def. Counsel Defendant, Reinier Cortes 

7 Live c/o Def. Counsel Defendant, Andrea Gonzalez Quintero 

8 Live c/o Def. Counsel Alix Ledesma

9 Live c/o Def. Counsel Katrina Guerra

10 Live c/o Def. Counsel Ana Monge 

11 Live 1221 S.W. 92nd Ave, Miami, FL Jennifer Manjarres 

The Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement this Trial Witness List.

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 75-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 1 of 2
Dated June 12, 2023.

/s/Toussaint Cummings, Esq.

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. (119877)

toussaint@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Ave.

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 75-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4824 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4824

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
        separate subheadings for hair clippers used for animals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2000

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on Ways of Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide 
        separate subheadings for hair clippers used for animals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAIR CLIPPERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 8510 of chapter 85 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking subheading 8510.20.00 and inserting the 
        following, with the article description for subheading 8510.20 
        having the same degree of indentation as the article 
        description for subheading 8510.10.00, and with the article 
        descriptions for subheadings 8510.20.10 and 8510.20.90 having 
        the same degree of indentation as the article description for 
        subheading 8510.90.55:

      

``      8510.20          Hair clippers:
        8510.20.10         Hair clippers for    4%                Free (A,CA,E,         45%
                            animals for use                       IL,J,MX)
                            on the farm.....
        8510.20.90         Other............    4%                Free (A,CA,E,         45%
                                                                  IL,J,MX)                                   '';

         and
            (2) by striking subheading 8510.90.30 and inserting the 
        following subheadings and superior text thereto, with such 
        superior text having the same degree of indentation as the 
        article description for subheading 8510.90.55:

      

``                          Parts of hair
                             clippers:
         8510.90.30         For animals for      4%                 Free (A,CA,E,          45%
                             use on the farm.                       IL,J,MX)
         8510.90.40         Other............    4%                 Free (A,CA,E,          45%
                                                                    IL,J,MX)                                  ''

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, Be ales and Senior Judge Fitzpatrick

WILDA SELLERS CLEAR MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0930-06-3 PER CURIAM AUGUST 22, 2006 PINEY FOREST HEALTHCARE CENTER AND HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Stephen G. Bass; Carter Craig, on brief), for appellant. (Richard D. Lucas; Lucas Law Firm, PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Wilda Sellers Clear appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that (1) she failed to prove a compen sable cervical condition causally related to her September 30, 2004 work injury; and (2) she was not en titled to medical bene fits for treatment of that condition or wage loss benefits commencing February 5, 2005. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Clear v. Piney Forest

Healthcare Center , VWC File No. 221-16-80 (Mar. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1095

In Re: MONICA B. YOUNG,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-151-H4)

Submitted: April 10, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monica B. Young, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Monica B. Young has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

asking this court to direct the district court to issue summonses

in cases previously dismissed by the district court and whose

dismissals were affirmed on appeal. Mandamus is a drastic remedy

to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United

States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is

only available when there are no other means by which the relief

sought could be granted, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.

1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re

Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The

party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing

that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires

and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable.

Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980).

Young has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we

grant Young’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we

deny her petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 238.8 Other participation.

In addition to providing flood damage reduction works in urban areas, the Corps may provide related services to State and local governments on a reimbursable basis. Under Title III of the Inter-governmental Cooperation Act of 1968, specialized or technical services for which the Corps has specific expertise may be furnished only when such services cannot be procured reasonably and expeditiously from private firms (see ER 1140-2-303).
writ_ex105.htm


EXHIBIT 10.5


 


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 


 



 


3
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



|(1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123116) pertaining to the options to purchase common stock granted under the Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan of Rendition
Networks, Inc. and assumed of Opsware Inc.,
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-104904) pertaining to the 2000 Incentive Stock Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Opsware Inc. and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8/S-3 No. 333-56762) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Plan, 2000 Stock Plan, 2000 Incentive Stock Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Loudcloud,
Inc.;
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



of our reports dated April 14, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Opsware Inc., Opsware Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Opsware
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California

April 14, 2005
**Exhibit 4.6****CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER****MERGING****PALM, INC.****INTO****PALMONE, INC.**     Pursuant to Section 253 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, palmOne, Inc.(the “Company”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware,**DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:****FIRST:**That the Company was incorporated as Palm, Inc. on December 17, 1999 pursuant to theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.**SECOND**: That the Company changed its name to palmOne, Inc. effective as of October 29, 2003pursuant to the merger of PLMO Merger Corporation with and into Palm, Inc.**THIRD:**That the Company owns all of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of Palm, Inc., acorporation incorporated on July 7, 2005 pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State ofDelaware.**FOURTH:**That the Company, by the following resolutions of its Board of Directors, duly adopted byunanimous written consent effective as of July 11, 2005, determined to merge Palm, Inc. with andinto the Company:**WHEREAS,**the Company owns all of the outstanding capital stock of Palm, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (“**Palm**”).**WHEREAS**, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “**Board**”) has determined it to beadvisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to merge Palm withand into the Company pursuant to Section 253 of the Delaware General Corporation Law tochange the Company’s name to “Palm, Inc.”**NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,**that the Board hereby authorizes the Company to merge withPalm, with the Company being the surviving corporation, and to assume all of Palm’sliabilities and obligations (the “**Merger**”).
 

 
**RESOLVED FURTHER,**that the Merger shall be effective on July 14, 2005 in connection with thefiling of a Certificate of Ownership and Merger with the Secretary of State of the State ofDelaware.**RESOLVED FURTHER,**that upon the effectiveness of the Merger, the name of the Company shallbe changed to “Palm, Inc.” and Article I of the Amended and Restated Certificate ofIncorporation of the Company shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:“**ARTICLE I**The name of the Corporation is Palm, Inc. (the “Corporation”).”**RESOLVED FURTHER,**that the Board of Directors hereby authorizes and directs the appropriateofficers of the Company (the “**Authorized Persons**”), and each of them, to execute and fileall documents, including a Certificate of Ownership and Merger, and to take all otheractions which they deem necessary or desirable to carry out the intent or accomplish thepurposes of the foregoing resolutions.
- 2 -

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, palmOne, Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by Mary E. Doyle,its Senior Vice President, this 11th day of July 2005.      PALMONE, INC.
-cr-06239-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2000 P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abrams Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan R. Abrams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: March 17, 2003                     /s/ Alan R. Abrams
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Alan R. Abrams
                                         Chief Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****NOAA progress report[electronic resource] : status of MPA Executive Order 13158 and National MarineProtected Areas Center**
 
2002-03 | 2004| 2005 | 2006
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.60/2:
Item Number:0250-E-45 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000638955
 
December 10, 2019
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian K. Hutchison, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       |  |       |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- |  | --------------
|/s/    BRIAN K. HUTCHISON                              |  | Date: |  | March 16, 2005
|Name: Brian K. Hutchison                               |  |       |  |               
|Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |       |  |               



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 142.81 Purpose and applicability.

This subpart prescribes requirements relating to general working conditions on OCS facilities.
§ 334.1230 Port Orchard; naval restricted area. ( a ) *Port Orchard; naval restricted area* — ( 1 ) *The area.* Shoreward of a line beginning at a point on the west shoreline of Port Orchard bearing 90° from stack (at latitude 47°42′01′′, longitude 122°36′54′′); thence 90°, approximately 190 yards, to a point 350 yards from stack; thence 165°, 6,000 yards, to a point bearing 179°, 1,280 yards, from Battle Point Light; thence westerly to the shoreline at latitude 47°39′08′′ (approximate location of the Brownsville Pier).
( 2 ) *The regulations.* ( i ) No vessel shall, at any time, anchor or tow a drag of any kind in this area.
( ii ) The regulations in this paragraph shall be enforced by the Commander, Naval base, Seattle, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[26 FR 11203, Nov. 28, 1961. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 334.1230, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Ch.18 – Ct. of Fed. Claims

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Ch.18 – Ct. of Fed. Claims Ch.18 – Ct. of Fed. ClaimsADR2022-02-17T18:11:22-05:00
			
			Ch.18 – Ct. of Fed. ClaimsWhen a matter is filed at the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC), counsel for the parties are required to confer and submit a Preliminary Status Report.  Part of this early meeting, as well as their report, must include a discussion regarding the use of ADR.  COFC Rules, Appendix A at 3(f) and 4(i).  Shortly thereafter, the presiding judge will convene a pretrial conference to address scheduling and the the use of “special procedures to assist in resolving the dispute,” i.e., ADR.  COFC Rule 16(c)(2)(I).
The COFC is currently (May 2015) reviewing its ADR procedures.  This chapter of the Electronic Guide to Procurement ADR 2d will be revised when new guidance from the court is issued.
**LEARN MORE**
U.S. Court of Federal Claims ADR Program Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508