alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4793

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to waive the obstetrician

requirement insofar as it prevents DSH designation in the case of certain

rural hospitals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. KINGSTON (for himself, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. LINDER, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr.

COBLE, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr.

HORN, Mr. HOLDEN, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. RILEY, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mr. FOLEY, Mr.

DICKEY, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr.

COMBEST, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. BAKER, Mr.

WAMP, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. GOODE, Mr. CANNON, Mr. HILLEARY,

Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. WISE, Mr. KIND, Mr. LATHAM, and

Ms. DANNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to waive

the obstetrician requirement insofar as it prevents DSH

designation in the case of certain rural hospitals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4793 IH

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF OBSTETRICIAN REQUIREMENT IN2 SOFAR AS IT PREVENTS DESIGNATION OF

3 CERTAIN RURAL HOSPITALS AS DISPROPOR4 TIONATE SHARE HOSPITALS.

5 Section 1923(d)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42

6 U.S.C. 1396r–4(d)(2)(A)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (i);

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of clause

9 (ii) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new

11 clause:

12 ‘‘(iii) which the State has designated as a

13 critical access hospital (under section

14 1820(c)(2)) or as an essential rural health care

15 provider (under applicable State law).’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulation Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2470-000]


Mid-Continent Area Power Pool; Notice of Filing

June 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 8, 2000, Mid-Continent Area Power Pool, 
tendered for filing notice of withdrawal of its proposed regional 
transmission tariff filed with the Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm call 202-208-222 
for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14120 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 151.1505 Severability.

If a court finds any portion of this subpart to have been promulgated without proper authority, the remainder of this subpart will remain in full effect.

[USCG-2001-10486, 77 FR 17304, Mar. 23, 2012]
#### JEANNETTE H. HAMMOND, by her Guardian, and others, Appellants, *v.*WILLIAM M. DEAN.

*Costs of attorney—order directing payment of—lurn enforced.*

The plaintiff, in an action for breach of promise of marriage, being desirous of changing her attorney, an order was entered directing such change to be made, and providing that $200 costs of the former attorney be made a prior lien on any judgment recovered, and that the same should be paid out of the first money received thereunder. Subsequently the suit was settled, and $2,900 paid to the attorney. Upon the application of the first attorney, an order was made directing the plaintiff and the second attorney, to pay over $200 to him. *Held*that the order was proper, and should be affirmed.

Appeal from an order directing the plaintiff and her attorneys to pay over certain moneys received in this action.

*Breen & Spellissy,*for the appellants,

---, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., and Gilbert, J.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abrams Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark J.
Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: September 14, 2004                 /s/ Mark J. Thomas
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Mark J. Thomas
                                         Chief Financial Officer
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0705 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM052AD

700 - 30 - 021 --- 8/28/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
§ 154.2204 Fire, explosion, and detonation protection. This section applies to tank barge cleaning facilities (TBCFs) collecting vapors of flammable, combustible, or non-high flash point liquid cargoes. ( a ) A vapor control system (VCS) with a single facility vapor connection that processes vapor with a vapor recovery unit must— ( 1 ) Have a detonation arrester located as close as practicable to the facility vapor connection. The total pipe length between the detonation arrester and the facility vapor connection must not exceed 18 meters (59.1 feet) and the vapor piping between the detonation arrester and the facility vapor connection must be protected from any potential internal or external ignition source; or
( 2 ) Have an inerting, enriching, or diluting system that meets the requirements of 33 CFR 154.2107.
( b ) A VCS with a single facility vapor connection that processes vapor with a vapor destruction unit must— ( 1 ) Have a detonation arrester located as close as practicable to the facility vapor connection. The total pipe length between the detonation arrester and the facility vapor connection must not exceed 18 meters (59.1 feet) and the vapor piping between the detonation arrester and the facility vapor connection must be protected from any potential internal or external ignition source; and
( 2 ) Have an inerting, enriching, or diluting system that meets the requirements of 33 CFR 154.2107.
( c ) A VCS with multiple facility vapor connections that processes vapor with a vapor recovery unit must have a detonation arrester located as close as practicable to each facility vapor connection. The total pipe length between the detonation arrester and each facility vapor connection must not exceed 18 meters (59.1 feet) and the vapor piping between the detonation arrester and the facility vapor connection must be protected from any potential internal or external ignition source.
( d ) A VCS with multiple facility vapor connections that processes vapor with a vapor destruction unit must— ( 1 ) Have a detonation arrester located as close as practicable to each facility vapor connection. The total pipe length between the detonation arrester and each facility vapor connection must not exceed 18 meters (59.1 feet) and the vapor piping between the detonation arrester and the facility vapor connection must be protected from any potential internal or external ignition source; and
( 2 ) Have an inerting, enriching, or diluting system that meets the requirements of 33 CFR 154.2107.
( e ) 33 CFR 154.2105(j) applies to a TBCF's VCS.
D

Hoodia 

This fact sheet provides basic information about the herb hoodia—common 

names, uses, potential side effects, and resources for more information. Hoodia 

is a flowering, cactus-like plant native to the Kalahari Desert in southern 

Africa. Its harvest is protected by conservation laws. 

Common Names—hoodia, Kalahari cactus, Xhoba 

Latin Name—Hoodia gordonii 

What It Is Used For 

•	 Kalahari Bushmen have traditionally eaten hoodia stems to reduce their 

hunger and thirst during long hunts. 

•	 Today, hoodia is marketed as an appetite suppressant for weight loss. 

How It Is Used 

•	 Dried extracts of hoodia stems and roots are used to make capsules, 

powders, and chewable tablets. Hoodia can also be used in liquid extracts 

and teas. 

•	 Hoodia products often contain other herbs or minerals, such as green tea or 

chromium picolinate. 

What the Science Says 

There is no reliable scientific evidence to support hoodia’s use. No studies of 

the herb in people have been published. 

Side Effects and Cautions 

•	 Hoodia’s safety is unknown. Its potential risks, side effects, and 

interactions with medicines and other supplements have not been studied. 

•	 The quality of hoodia products varies widely. News reports suggest that 

some products sold as hoodia do not contain any hoodia. 

•	 Tell your health care providers about any complementary and alternative 

practices you use. Give them a full picture of what you do to manage your 

health. This will help ensure coordinated and safe care. 
 

♦♦♦

Sources 

Hoodia. Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database Web site. Accessed at http://www.naturaldatabase.com on May 16, 2007. 

Hoodia (Hoodia gordonii). Natural Standard Database Web site. Accessed at http://www.naturalstandard.com on May 16, 2007. 

For More Information 

Visit the NCCAM Web site at nccam.nih.gov and view: 

• What’s in the Bottle? An Introduction to Dietary Supplements at nccam.nih.gov/health/bottle/ 

• Herbal Supplements: Consider Safety, Too at nccam.nih.gov/health/supplement-safety/ 

NCCAM Clearinghouse 

Toll-free in the U.S.: 1-888-644-6226 

TTY (for deaf and hard-of-hearing callers): 1-866-464-3615 

E-mail: info@nccam.nih.gov 

CAM on PubMed 

Web site: nccam.nih.gov/camonpubmed/ 

NIH Office of Dietary Supplements 

Web site: www.ods.od.nih.gov 

This publication is not copyrighted and is in the public domain. Duplication is encouraged. 


NCCAM has provided this material for your information. It is not intended to substitute 

for the medical expertise and advice of your primary health care provider. We encourage 

you to discuss any decisions about treatment or care with your health care provider. The 

mention of any product, service, or therapy is not an endorsement by NCCAM. 

National Institutes of Health 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

D387 

Created August 2007 

Updated June 2008 

*D387*
Merrimack

No. 7865

#### Timothy C. Sullivan, Administrator Estate of Daniel J. Cronin v. Amelia R. Chapman

December 30, 1977

Timothy C. Sullivan, by brief, pro se.

*Brackett L. Scheffy,*of Bradford, by brief for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

This equity action seeks to compel the defendant to turn over the proceeds of two joint bank accounts and other property to the estate of Daniel J. Cronin. The joint accounts were created by deceased during his lifetime and became the property of the defendant as survivor on his death. RSA 384:28; *In re Wszolek Estate,*112 N.H. 310, 295 A.2d 444 (1972); *see Boucher v. Johnson,*117 N.H. 343, 373 A.2d 349 (1977).

The Master *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.) found that the plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant induced the deceased to change *1061his bankbook by fraud or undue influence, that the deceased changed his bankbook knowingly, and that a joint account with rights of survivorship was what he intended. The master recommended judgment for the defendant. The report was approved by *Cann,*J., who transferred plaintiff’s exceptions.

The credibility of the witnesses was for the trial court and the evidence did not compel a different result. *New Bradford Co. Inc. v. Meunier,*117 N.H. 774, 378 A.2d 748 (1977).

*Exceptions overruled.*
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abrams Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Alan R. Abrams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: December 15, 2004
    
    /s/ Alan R. AbramsAlan R. Abrams
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex
Incorporated for the period ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex
Incorporated.





/s/
      John Adamovich, Jr.Name:  John
      Adamovich, Jr.Date:  February
      11, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32(b)
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama
Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we, the undersigned,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for the quarter
     ended September 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama
     Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Alabama Power Company.



                              /s/Charles D. McCrary
                               Charles D. McCrary
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                           /s/William B. Hutchins, III
                            William B. Hutchins, III
                            Executive Vice President,
                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  November 12, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Diversified Security Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 28, 2003                           /s/ James E. Henry
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  James E. Henry
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  March 28, 2003                           /s/ Louis Massad
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Louis Massad
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32(c)
                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia
Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)           such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for
              the quarter ended March 31, 2004, which this statement
              accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
              Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of Georgia Power Company.



                              /s/Michael D. Garrett
                               Michael D. Garrett
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                                /s/C. B. Harreld
                                  C. B. Harreld
                            Executive Vice President,
                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  May 6, 2004
Strafford

No. 7816

#### *In re*Estate of Phyllis J. Bliss

October 31, 1977

*Paul B. Urion,*executor of the estate of Phyllis J. Bliss, and *Gary R. Cassavechia,*both of Rochester *(Mr. Cassavechia*orally), amicus curiae.

*David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Andrew R. Grainger,*attorney *(Mr. Grainger*orally), for the state.

Per curiam.

This case presents a certification from the Strafford County Probate Court *(Galanes,*J.) of four questions of law propounded by the executor of the estate of Phyllis J. Bliss pursuant to RSA 547:30.

At the close of oral argument of this case it became clear that neither the legatees nor attorney general made any claim adverse to the views taken by the executor. It is conceded by all concerned that our resolution of the certified questions would not affect the distribution of the testator’s estate or assist the executor in his administration of the estate. Since our resolution of the certified questions is not necessary to aid the executor in the performance *915of his fiduciary duties or to resolve matters in contention, the advice of this court under RSA 547:30 is not required. *Drake v. True,*72 N.H. 322, 56 A. 749 (1903); *Bailey v. McIntire,*71 N.H. 329, 330, 52 A. 446 (1902); *Carr v. St. Paul’s Parish,*71 N.H. 231, 233, 51 A. 920, 921 (1902); *see State v. Doyle,*117 N.H. 789, 378 A.2d 1379 (1977).

*Remanded.*
#### DAVID W. SWEET, Respondent, *v.*JAMES L. TITUS and ANDREW R. TITUS, Appellants.

*Payment—when delivery of cheek is not—creditor not bound to receive either check or money.*

The delivery of a check is not a payment, unless there be an agreement to that effect, or unless the drawer, in consequence of some laches on the part of the holder, has sustained loss or injury in respect thereof, and then only *pi'o tanto. (The Syracuse, Binghamton and N. Y. R. R. Co.*v. *Collins,*3 Lansing, 29 and cases cited ; *Hill*v. *Beebe,*13 N. Y., 566; *Bradford*v. *Fox,*38 id., 289.)

The creditor is not bound to accept a check, even if it be for the entire amount of his claim. He is not bound to receive money. He may, although it be sent to him, refuse to accept it and leave the debtor to his plea of tender when sued for the claim. He may do this even though, having received the money, he keeps it subject to the order of the debtor. The latter must withdraw the money and plead a tender, and thus save himself from the costs of the controversy. (T*he Kingston Bank*v. *Gay,*19 Barb., 460.)

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee.

*J. H.*& *W. L. Van Derzee,*for the appellants.

*E. E. Harding,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Southern District of Florida

DONALD J. TRUMP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

9:22-cv-81294-AMC

08/31/2022 /s/Charles D. Tobin

Charles D. Tobin (FBN 816345)

1909 K St., NW, 12th Fl.

Washington, D.C. 20006

tobinc@ballardspahr.com

(202) 661-2218

(202) 661-2299

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Proposed Intervenors WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post, Cable News Network, Inc., NBCUniversal 

Media, LLC d/b/a NBC News, the E.W. Scripps Company, the Associated Press, Gray Media Group, Inc., d/b/a 

WCJB-TV, WJHG-TV, WWSB-TV, and Bloomberg LP.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 1 of 1
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1931

Lower Tribunal No. 22CF000565AOS

_____________________________

QUONTAVIUS LEON HEGGS,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County.

Keith A. Carsten, Judge.

July 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WHITE, MIZE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant 

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED