alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 **U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

# Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities **Federal Advisory Committee**

**September 8 -**  **10 , 2008**  **InterC ontinental Kansas City**  **at T he Plaza** 

**401 Ward Parkway Kansas City, MO 64112**  **Telephone: 816 -**  **756 -**  **1500** 

### AGENDA **Monday, Septemb er 8**  **, 2008 8:**  **30 am**  **REGISTRATION (Hotel)**  **9 :**  **0 0**  **Call to Order and**  **Meeting Commencement** 

 **Jim Moseley**, Chair, FRRCC **9 :**  **20 Opening Remark** **s**

 **Mark Joyce**, Associate Director, O ffice of C ooperative E nvironmental M anagement **9 :**  **25 Introductory Remarks** 

 **John Askew** , Reg ional Administrator, EPA Region Seven **9 :**  **30 Welcoming**  **Remarks and Discussion** 

 **Stephen L. Johnson** , Administrator, EPA  **Edward T. Scha fer** , Secretary, USDA **10: 4**  **5 MORNING BREAK**  **1 1**  **: 0**  **0 Presentation**  **s**

 **Joe Jobe**, Chief Executive Officer, National Biodiesel Board (2 0 min. presentation, 25 min. Q&A)2  **Geoff Cooper**, Director of Research, Renewable Fuels Association (20 min. presentation, 25 min. Q&A) **12 :**  **3 0 pm**  **BREAK FOR LUNCH 2:0**  **0 EPA Updates**  **: Sally Shaver** , Acting Counselor to the Administrator for

Agricultural Policy, EPA **2:30 Administrative Matters:**  **Christopher Ashcraft**, Assistant DFO, FRRCC **2:40 Workgroup Next Steps:**  **Jim Moseley**, Chair, FRRCC

 Workgroup Goals  Workgroup Assignments  Workgroup Relationships w/ EPA Program Offices  Workgroup Meeting Schedule (Monthly Ph one Conferences) **3:0 0**  **Public Comment Session**  **3:3 0**  **AFTERNOON BREAK 3:4**  **5 Workgroup Breakout Sessions**  (EPA programmatic contacts meet with

respective workgroups) **5:45 ADJOURN**  **6:30 Field Trip and Discussion with the Agricultural Business Council of**  **Ka nsas City**  **Tuesday, September 9 , 2008**  **C ommittee members will engage in**  **fact -**  **gathering activitie s on Tuesday,**  **September 9**  **. Wednesday, September 10, 2008**  **7:3 0 am**  **REGISTRATION (Hotel)**3

**8:0 0**  **Workgroup Breakout Sessions** (EPA programmatic contacts meet wit h

respective workgroups) **10:0 0**  **MORNING BREAK 10:15**  **Call to Order**, **Plenary Workgroup**  **Presentation S ession**  **: moderated by** 

**Jim Moseley**, Chair, FRRCC  Climate Change Workgroup  Livestock Workgroup  Emerging Issues Workgroup **12:0 0**  **pm FRRCC Next Steps:**  **moderate d by**  **Jim Moseley**, Chair, FRRCC

 Next Committee Meeting (when, where, topics for discussion)  Workgroup Assignments  Workgroup Meeting Schedule  Other Business, as Needed **1 2**  **:30 Public Comment Session**  **1:0 0**  **ADJOURN**
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Negroes in the United States: Their Employment and Economic Status

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Negroes in the United States: Their Employment and Economic Status : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1119*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4449,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

956 CAF 11-01932 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF NINA E. HAWTHORNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JASON L. HALL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
COURTNEY S. RADICK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OSWEGO, FOR DECEMBER R.H.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Bobette J. Morin, R.), entered August 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Hall v Hawthorne ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 5, 2012]).

Entered: October 5, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Argued and submitted June 8,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing September 30, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JORGE ARCADIO CORONADO, *Appellant.*

(91C-20837; CA A71619)

838 P2d 641

Helen L. Cooper, Salem, filed the brief and argued the cause for appellant.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and James H. Juliussen, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*387PER CURIAM

Defendant pled guilty to three counts of delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. His criminal history and the crime seriousness placed him in grid block 4-G, which carries a presumptive probation sentence. The sentencing court imposed a dispositional and upward departure of 12 months on count I, 4 months on count II and 4 months on count III, all to run consecutively. Defendant appeals, contending that the court failed to find substantial and compelling reasons to support the departure. We remand for resentencing.

In *Statev. Wilson,*111 Or App 147, 151, 826 P2d 1010 (1992), we held:

> “[W]e review the explanation of why the circumstances are so exceptional that imposition of the presumptive sentence would not accomplish the purposes of the guidelines. If the explanation does not demonstrate that, we must remand for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5).”

We review only the sentencing court’s factual basis and reasons for the departure, not the decision *whether*to depart. Here, the sentencing court simply acknowledged that it had listened to the arguments from both sides and then adopted the state’s recommendation. We are not able to review the court’s reasons for departure on this record. OAR 253-08-001.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 81ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF KARNES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 1, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or

reverse your judgment between

Robert Leal and Ramiro Leal, Appellant

V.

Cuanto Antes Mejor, LLC, Appellee

No. 04-14-00694-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 13-02-00041-CVK

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

Order and Final Judgment Regarding Summary Judgment is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee recover its costs of appeal from appellants.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on October 1, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00694-CV

Robert Leal and Ramiro Leal

v.

Cuanto Antes Mejor, LLC

(NO. 13-02-00041-CVK IN 81ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF KARNES COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

CERTIFIED COPY

MOTION FEE

CERTIFIED COPY

CLERK'S RECORD

INDIGENT

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

FILING

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

$6.00

$30.00

$19.00

$312.00

$25.00

$20.00

$100.00

$50.00

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

MICHAEL FULTON

CYNTHIA SHEPPARD

MICHAEL M FULTON

N/A

CYNTHIA SHEPPERD

CYNTHIA SHEPPARD

CYNTHIA SHEPPERD

CYNTHIA SHEPPARD

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this October 1, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
§ 142.7 Reports of unsafe working conditions. ( a ) Any person may report a possible violation of any regulation in this subchapter or any other hazardous or unsafe working condition on any unit engaged in OCS activities to an Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) After reviewing the report and conducting any necessary investigation, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, notifies the owner or operator of any deficiency or hazard and initiates enforcement measures as the circumstances warrant.
( c ) The identity of any person making a report under paragraph (a) of this section is not made available, without the permission of the reporting person, to anyone other than those officers and employees of the Department of Transportation who have a need for the record in the performance of their official duties.
§ 183.320 Preconditioning for tests. A boat must meet the following conditions for at least 18 hours before the tests required by §§ 183.325, 183.330, and 183.335: ( a ) Manufacturer supplied permanent appurtenances such as windshields, and convertible tops must be installed on the boat.
( b ) The boat must be loaded with a quantity of weight that, when submerged, is equal to the sum of the following: ( 1 ) Two-fifteenths of the persons capacity marked on the boat.
( 2 ) Twenty-five percent of the result of the following calculation, but not less than zero: the maximum weight capacity marked on the boat; less the weight shown in Column 9 of Table 183.75 for the maximum horsepower marked on the boat; less the persons capacity marked on the boat.
( c ) The weights required by paragraph (b) of this section are placed in the boat so that the center of gravity of each amount of weight required by paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section is within the shaded area illustrated in Figure 11. The location and dimensions of the shaded area are as follows: ( 1 ) The shaded area is centered at the mid-length of the passenger carrying area and at the mid-breadth of the boat;
( 2 ) The length of the shaded area, measured along the centerline of the boat, is equal to 40 percent of the length of the passenger carrying area of the boat; and
( 3 ) The breadth of the shaded area, measured at the mid-length of the passenger carrying area, is equal to 40 percent of the breadth of the passenger carrying area of the boat.
( d ) Weight must be placed in the normal operating position of the motor and controls in lieu of this equipment. The quantity of weight used for this purpose depends upon the maximum rated horsepower of the boat being tested and is specified in Column 4 of Table 183.75 for the swamped weight of the motor and controls.
( e ) Permanent fuel tanks must be filled with fuel and each external opening into the fuel tank must be sealed.
( f ) The boat must be keel down in the water.
( g ) The boat must be swamped, allowing water to flow between the inside and the outside of the boat, either over the sides, through a hull opening, or both. Entrapped air in the flooded portion of the boat must be eliminated.
[CGD 75-168, 42 FR 20245, Apr. 18, 1977, as amended by USCG-2016-1012, 82 FR 16522, Apr. 5, 2017]
#### Lovelady *v.*Roberts & McClure.

Submitted July 18,

Decided November 16, 1906.

Complaint. Before Judge Gober. Cherokee superior -court. ■October 17, 1905.

*Griffin & Attaway,*for plaintiff.

Lumpkin, J.

No error of law being complained of, and the jury having found in favor of the defendants, and there being sufficient evidence to authorize the finding, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.^ *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Joan W. Brubacher, certify that:
1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mobility Electronics,Inc.;
2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
        a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
        b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
        c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
        a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
        b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ Joan W. Brubacher  Joan W. Brubacher  Chief Financial Officer  May 10, 2004  
- 25 -
#### CHRISTIAN G. VOLTZ, Respondent, *v.*ABEL T. BLACKMAR, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered at Dutchess county Circuit, on the decision of the court without a jury.

The action was brought for the conversion of a certificate of deposit for $4,000. The plaintiff had been clerk with power of attorney to draw checks for the defendant. The relation being about to terminate, plaintiff drew a check on defendant’s bank account for $4,000, and thereon obtained the certificate in question) $4,000 being the amount due him, according to plaintiff’s calculation, from defendant. The defendant had plaintiff arrested, and the certificate was taken from him by the police and delivered to defendant; the defendant having previously received from plaintiff the defendant’s note for $3,000 canceled, the $3,000 being included in the $4,000 certificate, which note defendant retained.

The judge trying the cause found that the plaintiff, honestly believing the defendant indebted to him in the sum. of $4,000, by mistake and not otherwise, drew the check and applied the same to such indebtedness, and notified defendant at once thereof, and defendant authorized him to draw a check for the $3,000 note, but for no more until a settlement was had. The defendant was really indebted to plaintiff $156 less than the $4,000. The court at General Term was of opinion that a cause of action for conversion was made out, and that defendant having given a cause of action to plaintiff by a forcible seizure and conversion of the property, no lien for the $156 interest in the certificate, accrued to defendant from his tortious possession ; and that as to damages, the amount due upon the certificate at the time of conversion was the measure.*

*Lewis & Gurney,*for the appellant.

*Nichols & Allen,*for the respondent.

*

 Ingalls v. Lord, 1 Cow., 240; 1 Smith's Leading Cases, 605.

Opinion by

Tappen, J.

*140Present — Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 125 (Monday, June 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 36791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15309]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific 
Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, July 15, 2014, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. ET.

ADDRESSES: The meeting is open to the public. To access the call:
    1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740-1260 (U.S. & Canada).
    2. International participants dial: http://www.readytalk.com/intl.
    3. Enter access code 8083012, followed by ``''.
    To ensure we have sufficient access lines for the public, we 
request that members of the public notify Christine Chalk, the 
Designated Federal Officer, that you intend to call into the meeting 
via email at: christine.chalk@science.doe.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melea Baker, Office of Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research; SC-21/Germantown Building; U.S. 
Department of Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone (301) 903-7486, (Email: 
Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide 
advice and guidance on a continuing basis to the Department of Energy 
on scientific priorities within the field of advanced scientific 
computing research.
    Tentative Agenda Topic:
     To discuss and vote on Work Force Subcommittee Report.
    Public Participation: The teleconference meeting is open to the 
public. If you would like to file a written statement with the 
Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. If you 
would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the 
agenda, you should contact Melea Baker via FAX at 301-903-4846 or via 
email (Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov). You must make your request for an 
oral statement at least 5 business days prior to the meeting. 
Reasonable provision will be made to include the scheduled oral 
statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct 
the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public 
comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 30 days at the by contacting Ms. Melea Baker 
at the address or email listed above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 24, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-15309 Filed 6-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Log In **|** Subscribe **|**

Latest JARN Magzine Samsung Targets US$ 10 Billion in 

# Trane Exhibits First Air-cooled Chiller with Climat efriendly Refrigerant DR-55

2015/09/21 Trane **, a brand of Ingersoll Rand, presented the first-ev er air-cooled demonstration**  **chiller with next generation, low-global warming po tential (GWP) refrigerant DR-55 at**  **the IIR International Conference of Refrigeration. This demonstration chiller is a Trane AquaTrine usi** **ng DR-55, which is designed for top grade apartments, luxury villas, office buildings,**  **small restaurants, retail stores and hotels. It uses a high-efficiency hermetic scroll c**  **ompressor and evaporator technology to provide a stable, reliable, and highly efficient op**  **eration. DR-55, marketed by Chemours as Opteon XL55, is a ne** **xt generation low-GWP refrigerant with strong safety, design, and sustain**  **ability performance compared to other refrigerant choices. An olefin-based blend, DR-55 i**  **s currently being evaluated by the HVAC industry for use in unitary and residential eq**  **uipment.** To view the complete content, please log in. Username/ID
Password *Forgot Password?

Log in Home Magazine Markets Products Editorial Interviews Company Events Statistics **Page 1**  **of 3**  **JARN (Japan Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News)**

**12/ 9/** **2015 https://www.ejarn.com/news.aspx?ID=36282**
Debbie /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00107

- CV

Michael F. WILLIAMS

, Appellant

v.

Debbie D. WILLIAMS

, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 15949 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant filed his brief on March 19, 2014, believing there was no reporter’s record. On March 31, 2014, a reporter’s record was filed. On April 3, 2014, appellant filed a motion asking

leave to file an amended brief.

The motion is GRANTED and appellant is ORDERED to file an amended brief no later than May 5, 2014 . Appellee’s brief, which is currently due on April 18, 2014, is now due th i rty days from the date appellant file s his brief.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Mar ion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottl e
Clerk of Court