[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3392-3393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1444]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Chapter 301

[FTR Amendment 87]
RIN 3090-AH18


Federal Travel Regulation; Maximum Per Diem Rates and Other 
Travel Allowances

AGENCY:  Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

ACTION:  Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This document corrects entries listed in the prescribed 
maximum per diem rates for locations within the continental United 
States (CONUS), and footnote 4, contained in a final rule appearing in 
Part III of the Federal Register of Thursday, December 2, 1999 (64 FR 
67670). The rule, among other things, increased/decreased the maximum 
lodging amounts in certain existing per diem localities, added new per 
diem localities, and removed a number of previously designated per diem 
localities.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  January 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Joddy P. Garner, Office of 
Governmentwide Policy (MTT), Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202- 501-
4857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  In rule document 99-31215 beginning on page 
67670 in the issue of Thursday, December 2, 1999, make the following 
corrections:

Appendix A to Chapter 301 [Corrected]

    1. On page 67678, under the State of Louisiana, in the 31st line 
from the bottom under the entry New Orleans/Plaquemine/St. Bernard, 
column two is corrected to remove the word ``New''.

    2. On page 67679, under the State of Maryland, in the 15th line 
from the top under the entry Lexington Park/Leonardtown/Lusby, column 
two is corrected to remove the apostrophe and to add ``and Calvert''.

    3. On page 67679, under the State of Michigan, in the 11th line 
from the bottom under the entry Auburn, column two is corrected to read 
``Bay (except Auburn Hills, see Oakland and City limits of Auburn 
Hills)''.

    4. On page 67680, under the State of Michigan, in the 24th line 
from the bottom under the entry Pontiac/Troy/Auburn Hills, column two 
is corrected to read ``Oakland and City limits of Auburn Hills (see Bay 
County)''.

    5. On page 67683, under the State of Ohio, in the fifth line from 
the bottom under the entry Cincinnati, column two is corrected to read 
``Hamilton and Warren''.

    6. On page 67684, under the State of Pennsylvania, in the ninth 
line from the bottom under the entry King Prussia/Ft. Washington/Bala 
Cynwyd, column one is corrected to read ``King of Prussia/Ft. 
Washington/Bala Cynwyd'', and column two is corrected to add the county 
``Montgomery''.

    7. On page 67688, footnote 4 is corrected to include missing text 
and is set out in its entirety for the ease of the reader. The 
corrected text should read as follows:

Appendix A to Chapter 301--Prescribed Maximum Per Diem Rates for 
CONUS

* * * * *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                  Maximum lodging
              Per diem locality: Key city <SUP>1</SUP>                    County and/or other defined       amount (room rate   +    M&IE rate    =    Maximum per
                                                                      location <SUP>2</SUP> <SUP>3</SUP>                only--no taxes)                           diem rate <SUP>4</SUP>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           ...................................                (a)               (b)                  (c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
                        LOUISIANA
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
New Orleans/Plaquemine/St. Bernard......................  Orleans, Iberville and St. Bernard..                 88                42                  130
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
                        MARYLAND
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
Lexington Park/Leonardtown/Lusby........................  St. Marys and Calvert...............                 66                34                  100
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
                        MICHIGAN
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
Auburn..................................................  Bay (except Auburn Hills, see                        59                38                   97
                                                           Oakland and City limits of Auburn
                                                           Hills).

[[Page 3393]]

 
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
Pontiac/Troy/Auburn Hills...............................  Oakland and City limits of Auburn                    93                38                  131
                                                           Hills (see Bay County).
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
                          OHIO
Cincinnati..............................................  Hamilton and Warren.................                 69                46                  115
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
                      PENNSYLVANIA
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
King of Prussia/Ft. Washington/Bala Cynwyd..............  Montgomery..........................                 84                42                  126
                   *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
\4\ Federal agencies may submit a request to GSA for review of the costs covered by per diem in a particular city or area where the standard CONUS rate
  applies when travel to that location is repetitive or on a continuing basis and travelers' experiences indicate that the prescribed rate is
  inadequate. Other per diem localities listed in this appendix will be reviewed on an annual basis by GSA to determine whether rates are adequate.
  Requests for per diem rate adjustments shall be submitted by the agency headquarters office to the General Services Administration, Office of
  Governmentwide Policy, Attn: Travel and Transportation Management Policy Division (MTT), Washington, DC 20405. Agencies should designate an individual
  responsible for reviewing, coordinating, and submitting to GSA any requests from bureaus or subagencies. Requests for rate adjustments shall include a
  city designation, a description of the surrounding location involved (county or other defined area), and a recommended rate supported by a statement
  explaining the circumstances that cause the existing rate to be inadequate. The request also must contain an estimate of the annual number of trips to
  the location, the average duration of such trips, and the primary purpose of travel to the location. Agencies should submit their requests to GSA no
  later than May 1 in order for a city to be included in the annual review


    Dated: January 14, 2000.
William T. Rivers,
Acting Director, Travel and Transportation Management Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 00-1444 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-44-P