IN TH E UN ITED STATES D ISTRICT CO URT F

SOUTHERN DISTRICTOFFLORIDA FILEDBYp tili'lz- D.C.

W EST PALM BEA CH D IVISIO N

AtJ6312022

DONALDJ.TRUMP, ctjjutl.jk.ytjg:

S.D.OFFLA.-W.RR

Plaint? No.9:22-cv-81294-AMC

D ated:August31,2022

UN ITED STATESO FA M ERICA,

JURYTRIALDEM ANDED

Defendant

M OVANT-INTERVENOR (PRO SEI-M JK.PATEL'SREPLYTO

D EFEN D AN T'S RESPON SE AT D K T.48

1,T.E.,T.ERAJK.PATEL,theundersigned m ovant-intervenorpr0se,in theabovenamed case,with apendingm otion atDkt.36,herebysubm itthisreply toDefendantU nited StatesofA m erica'sResponseatD kt.48.

W HEREAS,tmderthecurrentoperations,theRepublichasbeen disregardedbythe

conductoftheUnitedStatesDOJandF.B.I,Nixonr.Gen.Serv.Ail?'nfn.,433U.S.425,447-

9(1977);and,

W HEREAS,thePresidencyconsistsoftheincum bentandform erPresident;and,

W HEREAS,theUnited StatesOrderofPrecedent,housedbytheOfficeoftheChief

ofProtocolofUnitedStatesSecretaryofState,showsusthatform er-presidentTrump is

precedentto the operationsofthe incumbent-Atorney Generalofthe United States,

https:/kwww .state.gov/wp-content/uploads/zozo/os/zozo-order-of-precedenceFINAL.pdfat2(revised5/14/20)andId.at1(''...thisdocumentestablishesageneral

orderforthecountry'shighest-levelpositions.'..'');andz'

1

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 1 of 10
W HEREAS,theConstitution'slaw and policy iswelldocum ented in theUnited

StatesOrderofPrecedentbecauseincumbentandformerPresidentsareexpectedtohave

aninformationadvantage,McMahonv.PresidentialAirways,502F.3d1331,1351(111 Cir.

2007)(quotingBakerv.Carr,369U.S.186,217(U.S.1962)),Sweeneyv.Tucker,375A.2d698,

473Pa.493,509(Pa.1977)(thePresidencyspecificallyhas''autonomousdeterminationof

theissueraised//);Comm.ontheludiciaty,LI.5.HouseofRepresentativesv.Miers,558F.Supp.

2d53,103(D.D.C.2008)(Bates,J.)(explainingthattheExecutivebranch'sseparation-ofpowersinterestin ''lplresidentialautonomy);44U.S.C.jj2204(b)(1)(A)(i)& (b)(1)(B);

andProf.CorneliusAdrianComstockVermeule(''AdrianVermeule/'),VeilofIgnorance

Rules in Constitutional Lazo, Yale 399, 403-07, 411-14, 399-433 (2001),

https://doi.org/10.2307/797593,.and,

W HEREAS, entrance into the former President's castle by the incumbent

governm entissupposed tobeà significantand distinguishablem ove and onethatis

readily available,assuch gesmres,ourFramersandFoundersverywellknew, are to set

them selvesapartfrom acoupdetat.

THEREFORE,any former presidentCan daim Privilege againstthe incumbent

governm entandlaw enforcement,exceptforwhen theincum bentPresidentisdirectly

involved with specifically authorized law enforcem ententities such asUnited States

SecretService agentsorUnited StatesM ilitary soldiers,contra. Endeley v.United States

Dm'fofDefense,268F.Supp.3d166,176(D.D.C.2017)(internalcitadonsomited).

W HEREAS,thevestigesoftheConstitution and the PresidentialRecordsAct, 44

U.S.C.jj2201etseq.,makesthismatterforthePresidencyalong;and,

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 2 of 10
W HEREAS,neithertheincumbentnorform erPresident'owntherecords,44U .S.C .

j2202;and,

W HEREAS,ohlytheUnitedStatesownsthePresidentialrecords,1J.;and,

THEREFORE,Governmentcan havenointerestsuperiortothoseoftheincumbent

orformerHeadsofState,b0th cohstitutionaldistinctentitieswhich areheaded bythe

incumbentPresident.itffcf.Dkt.48at24citingUnitedStatesv.Nixon,418U.S.683,708

(1974).

W HEREASZthePoliticalQuestionDoctrineandthePresidentialRecordsActmakes

informationmanagementan affairspecificaly ofthePresidencyratherthan thelarger

executivebranch,seee.g.,Holcombv.Bray,187N.E.3d1268,1290(Ind.2022)(''Thepolitical

question doctrine prevents courts from getting involved irtthe internalmatters of

(anotherlbranch./')(internalcitationsomitted),Jiménez'n.Palacios,250A.3d814,828,830,

837(De1.Ch.2019)(internalaffairsdoctrine),Ga.PowerC0.'p.AlliedChemicalCorp.,233

Ga.558,563(Ga.1975)(internalcitationomited),Grimaudv.Com,581Pa.398,418(Pa.

2005),andWiliamPennSch.Dist.r.Pa.Dep't0.JElzfc.,No.J-82-2016*39(Pa.Sep.28,2017)

(''self-monitoring'')(internalcitationsomitted);and,

W HEREAS,onlythePresidentandtheentirejudiciaryaretheonlyinstrumentsof

theUnitedStatesConstitutionsnotsubjecttoveilrulesizand,

WHEREAS,otherExecutivepersonnelinferiortothePresidency,cf.incumbent

President,andtheCongressaresubjecttoinformationveilrules,Prof.CorneliusAdrian

1.Form erPresidentscan possesspropertyand rights,which areow nedbytheUrtitedStates, on behalfof

theUnitedStates.SealsoTuckerAct,28U.S.C.5j1346(a)& 1491(formerPresidentTrumphasactual

authorityasformerpresidentoftheUnitedStatesfornecessarymatersoftheipsofactoofficeofthe

formerPresidentoftheUnitedStates),z.lzU.S.C.jj1981-2,andFederalistNos.78& 80.TheExcellent

titleholderswhoarenaturalborncitizensowntheUnitedStates.

2.Shouldlhavenotmyomnipresenttitlesandstylesfrom electedexcellentofficettheonlykindinthe

cotmtryindomesdcaffairs,asfarasIknow),mypoliticalsciencedegreefrom atop-tiertmiversity

allow sbeto overcom etheveilruleviatheUnited StatesConstitutionalPrivilegebestow ed uponm e

bythesameclauseofinterestforthePresident.U.S.const.art.lV,j2.SeeDkt.21.

3

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 3 of 10
ComstockVermeule(''AdrianVermeule/'),VkflofJgnprqnccRzllpsï'nConsfïftffïonllLaw,

111YaleL.J.399,403-07,411-14,399-433(2001),https://d01.0rg/10.2307/797593,.and,

W H/REAS,in otherwords,only the incum bentPresidèntwillknow ifa1lother

officersand persolm elofthe executivebranch areactingwith evidenceorupon legal

ignorance;and,

W HEREAS,ourFounders,uponstudya1lpriorcivilization,knew thatonlyaformer

HeadofStateisthenextwellpositionedtoknow;thisconceptm ayevenrem aintrueifa

VicePresidentoftheUnitedStates,especiallywho,duringtheFoundingEra,werevery

likelytobefrom differentpoliticalparties,isActingPresidentforashortperiod oftim e.

THEREFO'RE, in Order keep the Republic indivisible and standing,a form er

President,here,PresidentTrum p,can assertPrivilege.U .S.const.art. IV,j2.

W HEREAS,underthecurrentmethodadm inisteredtheUnited StatesDepartment

ofJustice,formerPresidentTrumpisheldaccountabletothesamestandard ofancfUnitedStatescitizenindividual-hum an-personelectedtolocaloffice,whom aybedenied

Privilegeoftheelectedoffice(legislative,executive,magistrate,andjudidal)byeitherthe

charteringSisterStateortheUnitedStates,U.S.const.art. IV,j2& amend.XIV,j1,c1.2;

and,

W HEREAS,thus,theAttorneyGeneralhascom mittedTreasonl,and;

W HEREAS,PresidentTrump hasbeen denied substantiveDue Processand his

honor'sPrivilegesasashield,ratherthanasword,confzu.Dkt. 48at26and seeU .S.const.

art.1V,j2& amend.XIV,j1,cl.29and,

W HEREAS,OurFram ers,whow ereafraid ofcolonization,bothby foreign values

and force,ofthisNew Union by Old W orld powers,havecertainly instilled a logical

distinctionbetweentheform erHeadsofStateoftheUnitedStatesandnot-citizensofthe

UnitedStates,sc:U.S.const.art.V1,j1referringtotheTreatyofParis(1783),Id.referring

4

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 4 of 10
toGrievances20& 21,Decl.ofIndep.(1776),andLinr.UnitedStates,561F.3d502,509

(D.C.Cir.2009).3

THEREFOREZtheDefendant-united States canriotdeny Plaintiff-rhe Honorable

Trum p his ''endtled''privileges and imm unides as a citizen ofthe United States.

4

Federalist80.

W HEREAS,ratherthan theincumbentAtorney General,itisclearthatincum bent

PresidentBidenshouldhaveactedbecausetheAttorneyGeneralGarland,executinghis

ownuncheckedw arrant,enteredthecastleofaform erHeadofStateoftheUnitedStates,

here,whoisformerPresidentTrump,scce.g.44U.S.C.j2209(c)(1);and,

W HEREAS,undertheConstitutionalreality,PresidentTrum p'scastle,even during

its weakeststato can withstand theentire Govem m entofthe United States with its

im penetrableshieldsupportedbyHisHonor'sstatus,precedent,Privileges,Im munities,

substantiveDueProcessrights,and/ortheFourthAmendmentsearchandseizure;and,

W HEREAS,am ongstthelaw enfoxcem entauthorities,onlytheUnited StatesSecret

Service and theUnited StatesM ilitary,underthe directcom m and oftheincum bent

United States President,can ''execute''a warrantin a prem iseswhich are otherwise

protectedbyan''impenetrablerforce)shieldz''18U.S.C.jj3056(c)(1)(A)& (D)& Dkt.36

at2-3.

THEREFORE,theDefendant-unitedStatesentranceintoPlaintiff-Trump'sprem ises

w ereinvalid.

W HEREAS,thePresidentialRecordsActm akethePresidentialrecordstheproperty

oftheUnitedStates,44U.S.C.j2022and42U.S.C.jj1981-29and,

3.KingEdwardVIII,formerHeadofStateoftheUnitedKingdom ofGreatBritainandhusbandofW allis

Simpson,theQueen'stmcle,andHerMajestyQueenElizabethHareonlyoneexample.

4.Congress,aswhole,hasthepowertoremovedtizenship.

5

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 5 of 10
W HEREAS,thus, the Presidentialrecords can be mutually possessed by the

inctmbentandformerPresident,U.S.const.art.IV,j2and42U.S.C.jj1981-2;and,

W HEREAS,Plaintiff-Trump has notbeen accused ofconverting United States

propertyof44U.S.C.j2022whichPlaintiffwasinpossession.

THEREFORE,the Defendant-united States cannotdeny Plaintiff-The H onorable

Trum phisPrivilegesbecauseheisalaw fulprocessorofUnitedStatesdocum ents.

W HEREAS,ifCongresshasthepowertoenactthePresidentialRecordsAct,then it

withoutForceunlessitisspecificallyapprovedbyincumbentPresident, U .S.const.art.1,

j1andZivotofskyv.Clinton,132S.Ct.1421,1441(U.S.2012/and,

W HEREAS,Defendant-united StatesofAm erkahassaidthatincumbentPresident

Bidenw asnotinvolvedin theraidatthecharteredM ar-a-Lago.

THEREFORE,thePresidentiallkecordsActw asw ithoutconstitutionalforceandhas

onlybeenused todisturb theRepublic.

W HEREAS,itisalsofairtosaythatPrivilegecanbeasserted againstahypothetical

Congressionalspecialprosecutor,whoactingupon ignorance,can changethepolitical

agendaoftheUnitedStates,apow ervestedin theincum bentleadership ofPresidentof

theUnited States,seeDkt.48at24 citingTAtfplpp.Thompson,142S. Ct.680,680(2022/

and,

ratification by the

incum bentPresidentisnotperm itted,which isalsoforthebestinterestoftheRepublic

andlargerStateoftheUnitedStates;and,

W HEREAS,the Constitutionalprindples m ake itclear that

W HEREAS,thepoliticalbranchesareheld accountablebythepoliticsand courtiers

ofW ashington,D.C.;and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 6 of 10
W HEREAS,thus,thepoliticalactorsofthepoliticalbranchesarenottobeshielded

by''neutral''executiveactorswhoansw eronlytoCongressionaloversightafteraperson

receivesstanding tosue,Dkt.48at26-29;and,

W HEREAS,theAm erican normsofpeacefultransition ofpow erhelpspolitically

enforcethePresidentialRecordsAct,Dep'tofCommercev.Montana,503U.S.442,448

(1992/and,

W HEREAS,the lawswhich been overlooked are the Privilegesand Imm tmities

Clause asapplied to the form erPresidentoftheUnited States, the castle doctrine as

applied to former Presidentofthe United States,the PoliticalQuestion Doctrine

(requiringthedirectlyassignedForces,underthecommonlaw,theConstihztion,orActs

ofCongress,to theincumbentand form erPresidentstohelp decideratherthan ofthe

UnitedStatesDepartmentofJustice),theauthorizingstatuteoftheUnitedStatesSecret

Service,andthePresidentialRecordsAct,JapanWhalingAss'nv.Am.CetaceanSoc'y,478

U.S.221,230(1986)(''theconfinesoftheExecutiveBranch,''theOvalOfficeand those

haveformerlysatthere);and,

WHEREAS,thecase-at-hand hasuniquely showed thatthepowersofjudicial

review willallow thisCourtto determinewhetherornotan application ofthePolitical

Question Doctrinehasbeen properly followed,which isalsoseverably answeredby

whetherthe applicable Privilegesto thePlaintiffwere followed orcastle doctrine as

appliedtothePlaintiffw asfollowed,i.e.didtheproperconfinesoftheExecutiveBranch

(i.e.thePresidency)follow protocol,seeId.,Zempreliv.Daniels,496Pa.247,255(Pa.1981),

TransW orldAirlines,Inc.v.Franklin M intCom .,466U .S.243,254(1984),Nixen'fJ.Lfnïécd

States,506U.S.224,240(1993),and Carmichaelp.Kelogg,572F.3d1271,1287(11th Cir.

2009/and,

7

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 7 of 10
W HBREAS,theamendersoftheUnitedStatesConstihztion havealsoshow ed that

theform erPresident,whom ustbçanattlral-bom citizen underthegoverning original

intent,isnotapluralized titlébeneath theUnited StatesN ationalGovernm entorthe

SisterStatetobother,U.S.const.amend.XIV,j2,c1.1;and,

W HEREAS,Iusem yConstitutionalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknowingfrom

myundergraduateand 1aw school,jurisdoctorcandidacy,educationsandpolitical

officesandfrom reading1aw outsideofform alschoolingforthewritinganddiscussions,

arguments,andmotionsofthesefilings,seeDkt.21at5& 20andsupra,p.9(signat-ure

linel.

THEREFORE,thecourtshouldappointaspecialm asterandallow intervention,and

in furtheranceoftheinterventionandFed.R.Civ.P.24,theCourtorderdisclosetome,

themovant-intervenor,a1ldocumentsto adequately and withoutprejudicerepresent

intervention andthecomm on questionsof1aw orfactandm yaforesaidinterestsinthis

transaction,asdescribed in Dkt.21& 36,asthisCourthasinherentauthority to help

maintaintherelationsofmylegitimateexcellency(excellencies,here)from andonlyfrom

electedofficeandensurethattheDevolved SovereigntytotheUnited Statesischecked.

SeealsoD kt.49.

FURTHER,1also m ove orpropose to thisCourt- m y appointm entto special

m asterwillallow thisCourtand theDefendantto ensure thatthe ExecutiveBranch,

undertheurtitaryexecutivetheory,isconductingreview ofthenecessarydocum entsthatIbeappointed asaspecialmaster.Contra.Elrodv.Burns,427U .S.347,353(1976).

SeealsoMcMahonv.PresidentialAirways,$02F.3d1331,1356n.22(11thCir.2007).

SeealsoDkt.36.

''IAJprosegmotionl,howeverinartfulypleaded,mustbeheldtolessstringentstandards

thanform alpleadingsdraftedbylawyers.''Ericksonr.Pardus,551U.S.89,94(2007).

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 8 of 10
Respectfully subm itted,

rz.'/c;..z,zJ<xz ..0

/s/RajK.Patel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(prose)

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion Cotm ty

317-450-6651(ce1l)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

J.D.Candidate,NotreDameL.Sch.2015-2017

President/sGdentBodyPresident,StudentGov'tAss'nof

EmoryU.,Inc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

StudentBodyPresident,BrownsburgCm ty.Sch.

Corp./president,BrownsburgHighSch.StudentGov't

2009-2010'(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.from theNotreDam eL.Sch.Sm dentB.Ass'ntothe

Ind.St.B.Ass'n 2017

DeputyRegionalDirector,Yotm gDem ocratsofAm .-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Founder& ViceChair,Ind.HighSch.Dem ocrats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.(Indep.),

Em oryU .,Inc.2011-2012

O xford C.Republicansof

9

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 9 of 10
CERTIfICATEoFsErtvlcE

IcertifythatIservedacopyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)Replytobkt.48on

08/31/2022tobelow individualsviathee-mail:

JamesM .Trusly

IFRAH ,PLLC

1717PennsylvaniaAve,NW ,Suite650

1W ashington,DC 20006

202-852-5669

jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

Lindsey H alligan

511SE5thAvenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

720-435-2870

lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverm an,Thompson,Slutkin,& W hite,

LLC

400EastPrattStreet,Suite900

Baltim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

ecorcoran@silvermanthompson.com

JuanAntonioGonzalez

UN ITED STATESA TTO RN EY

99NE41 Street,8thFloor

M iam i,F133132

Telephone:(305)961-9001

jtlan.antonio.gonzalez@usdoj.gov

Jay1.Bratt,Chief

Counterintelligence& ExportControl

SectionNat'lSecurityDiv.

950PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW

W ashington,D.C.20530

(202)233-0986

jay.brattz@usdoj.gov

D ated:August31,2022

Respectfullysubm itted,

éu'..v

lslRajPatel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(ProSe)

6850East21stStreet

lndianapolis,IN 46219

M arionCounty

317-450-6651(ce1l)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

10

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2022 Page 10 of 10