alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Key ADR Statutes","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"F6nUIuH1xA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/04-statutes\/\">Key ADR Statutes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/04-statutes\/embed\/#?secret=F6nUIuH1xA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Key ADR Statutes” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"F6nUIuH1xA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 479

To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act)

to require that contract work covered by the Act which requires licensing

be performed by a person who is so licensed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1999

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the DavisBacon Act) to require that contract work covered by

the Act which requires licensing be performed by a person who is so licensed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LICENSING.

4 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of March

5 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act) is amended by

6 adding at the end the following: ‘‘A contract covered by

7 this subsection which is to be carried out in a State which

8 requires persons performing the work under the contract
2

•HR 479 IH

1 to be licensed shall be carried out by a person who is so

2 licensed.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PAYCARGO FINANCE LP,

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-22707-KMW

Plaintiff,

vs.

ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant,

and 

BAY MARITIMES INC.,

Nominal Defendant.

/

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND 

MOTION TO CANCEL STATUS CONFERENCE

COME NOW, Plaintiff PAYCARGO FINANCE LP., and Defendant ASPEN 

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (collectively the “Parties”), by and 

through counsel, hereby file this, their Notice of Settlement and state as follows: 

1. Pursuant to L.R. 16.4, PCF and Aspen hereby give notice that they have

amicably resolved PCF’s claims alleged, or which could have been alleged, in this 

action. 

Case 1:22-cv-22707-DSL Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2024 Page 1 of 3
2

2. The Parties are currently finalizing and executing the documentation 

required to effectuate the Settlement, and the Parties anticipate filing a Joint 

Stipulation for Dismissal within 10 days

3. In light of PCF’s and Aspen’s settlement of the disputes between them, 

PCF and Aspen request that the Court vacate and cancel the in-person status 

conference set for Wednesday, May 8, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

RESPECTFULLY submitted on this day, May 7, 2024.

XANDER LAW GROUP, P.A.

/s/

Marcus Tan

(Fla. Bar No.: 38616)

marcus@xanderlaw.com

Wayne R. Atkins

(Fla. Bar No.: 84000)

wayne@xanderlaw.com

One N.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 200

Miami, FL 33132

Telephone: (305) 767-2001

Fax: (855) 926-3370

service@xanderlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, PayCargo 

Finance LP

GURLEY FANT

/s/ Michael A. Fant 

David E. Gurley

(Fla. Bar No.: 0402214)

dgurley@gurleyfant.com

Michael A. Fant

(Fla. Bar No.: 0100713)

mfant@gurleyfant.com

PO Box 2312

Sarasota, FL 34230

Telephone: (941) 365-4501

Facsimile: (941) 365-2916

eservice@gurleyfant.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Aspen 

American Insurance Company

Case 1:22-cv-22707-DSL Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2024 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy hereof was served upon the 

following parties/counsel via the Court’s CM/ECF on May 7, 2024.

GURLEY FANT

David E. Gurley

(Fla. Bar No.: 0402214)

dgurley@gurleyfant.com

Michael A. Fant

(Fla. Bar No.: 0100713)

mfant@gurleyfant.com

PO Box 2312

Sarasota, FL 34230

Telephone: (941) 365-4501

Facsimile: (941) 365-2916

eservice@gurleyfant.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Aspen American Insurance Company

By: /s/Jose Teurbe-Tolon

Jose Teurbe-Tolon, Esq. 

Case 1:22-cv-22707-DSL Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2024 Page 3 of 3
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  ADR

															Home/ADR About ADR
		This author has not yet filled in any details.So far ADR has created 0 blog entries. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA-MIAMI DIVISION

DELIO BATISITA, 

CARLOS LOPEZ, 

MARIANA LOPEZ,

and RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE, INC., REINIER CORTES and 

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

DEFENDANT’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA

PRESIDING JUDGE

HONORABLE 

CECILIA M. 

ALTONAGA

PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY

FAIRLAW FIRM

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. 

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. 

135 San Lorenzo Ave 

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY

CUETO LAW GROUP P.L.

Santiago Cueto Esq., 

Daniel Tropp, Esq.

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd.,

Suite 470 Coral Gables, FL 33146

TRIAL DATE(S)

July 3, 2023

COURT REPORTER COURTROOM DEPUTY

PLF.

NO

LIVE or BY

DEPOSITION

ADDRESS WITNESSES

1 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Delio Batista (Needs Interpreter)

2 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Marina Lopez

3 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Carlos Lopez

4 Live c/o Plaintiff’s counsel Plaintiff, Rafaela Valiente

5 Live Christopher Vasquez

6 Live c/o Def. Counsel Defendant, Reinier Cortes

7 Live c/o Def. Counsel Defendant, Andrea Gonzalez Quintero

8 Live c/o Def. Counsel Alix Ledesma

9 Live c/o Def. Counsel Katrina Guerra

10 Live c/o Def. Counsel Ana Monge

11 Live 1221 S.W. 92nd Ave, Miami, FL Jennifer Manjarres

12 Live 8230 nw 10th street 310, Miami, FL. 33126 Carmen Gloria Porras Lopez*

13. Live 8755 W 33rd Ave, Miami, FL. Alberto Darsa*

14. Live 905 SW 149th Court, Miami, FL. Ana Monge* 

15. Live 7392 NW 35th Terrace, Miami Fl Joseph Fonte*

16. Live 1165 NW 49th Street, Miami, FL. Miguel Sicilia*

The Defendants reserves the right to supplement this Trial Witness List.

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 75-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 1 of 2
* Plaintiffs object to the Defendants’ disclosure and/or calling of each witness 

so designated because none were identified in their Rule 26 Disclosures or 

Interrogatories during the discovery period. Defendants only identified 

Reinier Cortes, Andrea Gonzalez, Alix Ledesma, Katrina Guerra, Ana Monge, 

and Jennifer Manjarres as witnesses.

 Daniel E. Tropp

Daniel E. Tropp, Esq. Florida Bar No.:

948128

CUETO LAW GROUP P.L.

Attorneys for Defendants 

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Ste 470Coral Gables,

FL 33146

Tel.: (305) 777 0377

Primary Email: dantropp@cuetolawgroup.com

Secondary email dantroppesq@gmail.com

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 75-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 3.45-45 Sector Northern Great Lakes Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone; Marine Safety Unit Duluth. Sector Northern Great Lakes' office is located in Sault Ste. Marie, MI. A subordinate unit, Marine Safety Unit (MSU) Duluth, is located in Duluth, MN. ( a ) Sector Northern Great Lakes' Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone comprise all navigable waters of the United States and contiguous land areas within an area starting from a point at latitude 44°43′00′′ N on the international boundary within Lake Huron; proceeding due west to longitude 85°40′00′′ W; thence northwest to the eastern shore of Lake Michigan at latitude 45°01′00′′ N; thence northwest to latitude 45°22′30′′ N, longitude 86°19′00′′ W; thence northeast to latitude 45°41′00′′ N, longitude 86°06′00′′ W; thence northwest to latitude 46°20′00′′ N, longitude 87°22′00′′ W; thence west to the Minnesota-North Dakota boundary at latitude 46°20′00′′ N, longitude 96°36′30′′ W; thence north along the Minnesota-North Dakota boundary to the intersection of the Minnesota-North Dakota boundary and the international boundary at latitude 49°00′02′′ N, longitude 97°13′46′′ W; thence east along the international boundary to the starting point; and in addition, all the area described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The boundaries of the MSU Duluth Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zones comprise all navigable waters of the United States and contiguous land areas within an area starting at a point latitude 46°20′00′′ N, longitude 88°30′00′′ W, proceeding west to the Minnesota-North Dakota boundary at latitude 46°20′00′′ N, longitude 96°36′30′′ W; thence north along the Minnesota-North Dakota boundary to the intersection of the Minnesota-North Dakota boundary and the international boundary at latitude 49°00′02′′ N, longitude 97°13′46′′ W; thence east along the international boundary to a point at latitude 47°59′23′′ N, longitude 87°35′10′′ W; thence south to a point near Manitou Island Light at latitude 47°25′09′′ N, longitude 87°35′10′′ W; thence southwest to a point near the shore of Lake Superior at latitude 46°51′51′′ N, longitude 87°45′00′′ W; thence southwest to the point of origin.
[USCG-2009-0929, 76 FR 13510, Mar. 14, 2011, as amended by USCG-2023-0970, 88 FR 88250, Dec. 21, 2023]
§ 19.07 Chronological record of seaman's previous employment. ( a ) Compliance is hereby waived with regard to the provisions of subsection (h) of R.S. 4551, as amended (46 U.S.C. 643), to the extent necessary to permit the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard to issue a chronological record of a seaman's previous employment on a single document, in lieu of making individual entry in a duplicate continuous discharge book or furnishing individual certificates of discharge.
( b ) It is hereby found that the waiving of the provisions of R.S. 4551(h), as amended (46 U.S.C. 643), is necessary in the interest of national defense. [CGFR 51-9, 16 FR 1829, Feb. 27, 1951, as amended by CGFR 59-4a, 24 FR 3055, Apr. 21, 1959]

Cross Reference:
See 49 CFR 7.93 for the fee for this record.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.29 – Confidentiality","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CZEd91W9TJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch29\/\">Ch.29 – Confidentiality<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch29\/embed\/#?secret=CZEd91W9TJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.29 – Confidentiality” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"CZEd91W9TJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Perfluorooctan

Site Related EAssessment Pr3M and DyneoDecatur, Alabama 

Raw Data Appendices: July 

Quarterly Status Report

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM RGLP10-01-01 INTERIM RGLP10-01-01 INTERIM RGLP10-01-01 INTERIM R

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 15GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 18GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 19GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 20

Raw Data

Appendices:

July 1, 2011 to

September 30, 2011

Quarterly Status

Report 

11P-0094-v3-1

3M CompanySt. Paul, Minnesota

3M Company

St. Paul, Minnesota

Decatur, Alabama 

3M and Dyneon LLC

Assessment Program

Site Related Environmental 

Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) 

®

®
-cr-06024-PAS Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2001 P
-cr-06024-PAS Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2001 P
Order filed, June 3, 2022.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-22-00270-CV

CHANDRA CORPORATION D/B/A DIAMOND MARQUISE, Appellant

V.

ATASHI JEWELS, INC. D/B/A 7 ELEMENTS, ATIT PATEL AND NEETA 

PATEL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 458th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case 18-DCV-250844

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 23, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina L. Jackson, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 31(e)1**

**MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Anthony J. Topazi, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 4, 2006

/s/Anthony J. Topazi

Anthony J. Topazi

President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alabama Power Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Charles D. McCrary

Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Art P. Beattie

Art P. Beattie

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer      |

 

 

Date:  May 4, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Epixtar Corp. ("Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004 ("Report"), the undersigned certifies that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date:    April 15, 2005

By: /s/ Ilene Kaminsky, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed
Confidential Material

Removed