alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 





 



 


July 11, 2012


 


Mr. John Morton


131 Stacey Lane


Grass Valley, CA  95981







Re:           Taber Mine Option Agreement - Letter of Intent (“LOI”) - Amendment No, 1


 


 


Dear Mr. Morton;







As per our discussions, this writing will be Amendment No. 1, (herein referred to as the “Amendment”) to our Taber Mine Option Agreement - Letter of Intent (“LOI”) dated November 1, 2011, as follows:








	
1.  

	
The term of the Option shall be extended for an additional 12 months, for a total of 21 months from the date of original agreement.













	
2.  

	
The consideration paid to the Optionor during the term of this extension to the Option shall not be credited towards any subsequent lease payments.












If you concur that this letter correctly sets forth our amended understandings, please indicate your acceptance and approval of the letter in the space provided below.







Very truly yours,







North Bay Resources Inc.












By      /s/ Perry Leopold___________


Perry Leopold, CEO


ACCEPTED AND APPROVED












By    /s/ John Morton                        


John Morton







Date:           7/12/12
§ 156.107 Alternatives. ( a ) The COTP may consider and approve alternative procedures, methods, or equipment standards to be used by a vessel or facility operator in lieu of any requirements in this part if: ( 1 ) Compliance with the requirement is economically or physically impractical;
( 2 ) The vessel or facility operator submits a written request for the alternative at least 30 days before operations under the alternative are proposed, unless the COTP authorizes a shorter time; and
( 3 ) The alternative provides an equivalent level of safety and protection from pollution by oil or hazardous material, which is documented in the request.
( b ) The COTP takes final approval or disapproval action on any alternative requested, in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the request.
[CGD 75-124, 45 FR 7177, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36255, Sept. 4, 1990]
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.844 Safety Zone; Tennessee River, Miles 446.0 to 454.5, Chattanooga, TN. ( a ) *Location.* All navigable waters of the Tennessee River beginning at mile marker 446.0 and ending at mile marker 454.5 at Chattanooga, TN.
( b ) *Effective date.* This section is effective on March 5, 2018.
( c ) *Periods of enforcement.* This section will be enforced whenever flow rates reach or exceed 100,000 cubic feet per second at Chickamauga lock and dam on the Tennessee River at mile marker 471.0. The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a designated representative will inform the public through broadcast notice to mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone.
( d ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.
( 2 ) Persons or vessels desiring entry into or passage through the zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or at 1-800-253-7465.
( 3 ) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the COTP and designated U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
[USCG-2015-1113, 83 FR 8750, Mar. 1, 2018]
Exhibit 4.2


  


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


 



We have issued our report dated October 25, 2019, with respect
to the financial statement of Alaia Market Linked Trust, Series 1-7 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-234171) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.



 


 


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 25, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Minority Programs Review Committee MARC 
Review Subcommittee A.
    Date: June 22-23, 2000.
    Time: 8 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Richard I. Martinez, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 1AS-19G, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, (301) 594-2849.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Development 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 10, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-12542 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A2195. IN RE: THE ESTATE OF WESTON D. BAXTER, DECEASED.

Taylor L. Baxter filed this direct appeal from the probate court’s order ruling

that the executor of Weston D. Baxter’s estate may compromise the claim of the

deceased’s ex-wife. “Direct appeals are generally authorized fromlower court orders

that are final, meaning that there are no issues remaining to be resolved in the lower

court.” Mays v. Rancine-Kinchen, 291 Ga. 283, 284 (729 SE2d 321) (2012). Here,

however, the probate court’s order also denied the executor’s request to approve a

final settlement of the estate and ruled that it would “entertain [a global settlement

agreement] at a future date.” Accordingly, the order is interlocutory, as it leaves

matters pending below. Baxter was required to follow the interlocutory appeal

procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) to obtain review at this juncture. See Mays, supra;

Brandy v. Elmo, 280 Ga. 221, 222 (626 SE2d 505) (2006). Baxter’s failure to do so

deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/05/2015

August 05, 2015
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1334 Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base Seattle, Pier 36, Elliot Bay, Seattle, WA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: All waters in Elliot Bay east of a line from 47°35′26.67′′ N 122°20′34.84′′ W to 47°35′23.69′′ N 122°20′34.77′′ W at Pier 36, Elliot Bay, Seattle, WA.
( b ) *Regulations:* Under 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, no vessel may enter, transit, moor, or anchor within this security zone located at Pier 36, Elliot Bay, WA, except for vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port Puget Sound or Designated Representative.
( c ) *Authorization:* To request authorization to operate within this security zone, contact United States Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at 206-217-6001.
[USCG-2010-0021, 75 FR 53196, Aug. 31, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 67032, Nov. 1, 2010; USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10029, Feb. 16, 2023]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4752

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out projects for removing

accumulated snags and other debris from navigable waters to mitigate

damages resulting from a major disaster.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 26, 2000

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out projects

for removing accumulated snags and other debris from

navigable waters to mitigate damages resulting from a

major disaster.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF DEBRIS RESULTING FROM

4 MAJOR DISASTERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army may

6 carry out projects for removing accumulated snags and

7 other debris, and for protecting, clearing, and straight8 ening channels, in navigable waters to mitigate damages
2

•HR 4752 IH

1 resulting from a major disaster if, in the opinion of the

2 Secretary, such work is advisable in the interest of flood

3 control or navigation.

4 (b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

5 of a project carried out under this section shall be 90 per6 cent.

7 (c) MAXIMUM PROJECT COST.—Not more than

8 $500,000 may be expended in a fiscal year under this sec9 tion for any project on a single tributary.

10 (d) MAJOR DISASTER DEFINED.—In this section, the

11 term ‘‘major disaster’’ means a major disaster declared

12 under title IV of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief

13 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170 et seq.)

14 and includes a major disaster declared before the date of

15 enactment of this section.

16 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

17 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

18 $15,000,000 for each fiscal year beginning after Sep19 tember 30, 2000.

Æ
Senior Nutrition Program

 50years

CELEBRATE • INNOVATE • EDUCATE

Join Us!

It’s the 50th anniversary of the National Senior 

Nutrition Program and we’re celebrating!
§ 127.015 Appeals. ( a ) Any person directly affected by an action taken under this part may request reconsideration by the Coast Guard officer responsible for that action.
( b ) Except as provided under paragraph (e) of this section, any person not satisfied with a ruling made under the procedure contained in paragraph (a) of this section may— ( 1 ) Appeal that ruling in writing to the District Commander of the district in which the action was taken; and
( 2 ) Supply supporting documentation and evidence that the appellant wishes to have considered.
( c ) The District Commander issues a ruling after reviewing the appeal submitted under paragraph (b) of this section. Except as provided under paragraph (e) of this section, any person not satisfied with this ruling may— ( 1 ) Appeal that ruling in writing to the Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast Guard, (CG-5P), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509; and
( 2 ) Supply supporting documentation and evidence that the appellant wishes to have considered.
( d ) The Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy issues a ruling after reviewing the appeal submitted under paragraph (c) of this section, which is final agency action.
( e ) If the delay in presenting a written appeal has an adverse impact on the operations of the appellant, the appeal under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section— ( 1 ) May be presented orally; and
( 2 ) Must be submitted in writing within five days after the oral presentation— ( i ) With the basis for the appeal and a summary of the material presented orally; and
( ii ) To the same Coast Guard official who heard the oral presentation.
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33665, June 28, 1996; CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33363, June 19, 1997; USCG-2002-12471, 67 FR 41332, June 18, 2002; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36283, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38434, July 7, 2014; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58279, Sept. 18, 2020; USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5690, Feb. 2, 2022]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Harvey R. Blau, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Aeroflex
Incorporated, certify that:

     The Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended March 31, 2003,
     fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in such report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of Aeroflex
     Incorporated.

This   certification  is  being  furnished   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002  and,  except  to  the  extent  required  by  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act,  shall not be  deemed  to be filed as part of the  periodic
report  described  herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Aeroflex  Incorporated
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                               /s/Harvey R. Blau
                                            -------------------------
                                            Name: Harvey R. Blau
                                            Date:   May 15, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aeroflex  Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
United States Steel Corporation

– Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012 **Item 10** Id entify the manufacturer, including contact information, for all low NO X burners, SCR, scrubber, overfire air, and induced flue gas technologies considered technicall y feasible for use at the facility . **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or**  **were consulted in the preparation of the response:** Darren Gietzen (Hatch Engineering), Chriss y Bartovich, Teresa Simetkosky, Stephani Campbell **Answer:** The following are vendors/consultants which we have worke d with on vario us technologies. Although o ther manufacturers exist for the equipment listed below, these are the manufacturers we have worked with. Low NOx P re - heat burners:

Manufacturer: Fives North American Contact Information: Jack Cochenour

– ( 412) 655 - 0101 ext 111 Low NOx Main Burner :

Manufacturer: Coen Contact Information: Bob Wakelee

– ( 650) 522 - 2165 Line 6 Dry

Scrubber: Engineering Firm: Hatch Contact Information: Dave My sko

– (412) 497 - 2128 Manufacturer: FL Smidth Contac t Information: Kevin Tran

– (610) 264 - 6215 We have not included information on SCR, overfire air or induced flue gas technologies as we do not believe they

are technicall y feasible. Information provided in I tem 8 shows that even a SCR vendor say s they

b elieve the equipment will not work in our sy stem.
§ 162.230 Columbia River, Wash. ( a ) *Grand Coulee Dam discharge channel; restricted area* — ( 1 ) *The area.* That portion of the Columbia River between Grand Coulee Dam (situated at river mile 596.6) and river mile 593.7.
( 2 ) *The regulations.* ( i ) No vessel shall enter or navigate within the area without permission from the enforcing agency.
( ii ) The regulation in this section shall be enforced by the Chief, Power Field Division, Columbia Basin Project, U.S. Department of the Interior, Coulee Dam, Washington.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         698,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,893,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   728,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,785,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,580,000
<PP&E>                                      14,078,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,114,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             181,657,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,468,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                       127,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 102,461,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               181,657,000
<SALES>                                     48,915,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,915,000
<CGS>                                       40,750,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,750,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,894,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             969,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,302,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,001,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,301,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,301,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# Time and Date: 

11:00 a.m., Monday, January 24, 2000. 

# Place: 

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551. 

# Status: 

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Proposals concerning renovation of a Federal Reserve Bank building. 

2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information: 

You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: January 14, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-1400 Filed 1-14-00; 4:18 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 100.724 Annual Augusta Invitational Rowing Regatta; Savannah River, Augusta, GA. ( a ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Regulated area.* The regulated area is formed by a line drawn directly across the Savannah River at U.S. Highway 1 (Fifth Street) Bridge at mile marker 199.45 and directly across the Savannah River at Eliot's Fish Camp at mile marker 197. The regulated area includes the width of the Savannah River between these two lines.
( 2 ) *Coast Guard Patrol Commander.* The Coast Guard patrol Commander is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Charleston, SC.
( b ) *Special local regulations.* ( 1 ) Entry into the regulated area is prohibited to all non-participants.
( 2 ) After the termination of the Invitational Rowing Regatta each day, and during intervals between scheduled events, at the discretion of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, all vessels may resume normal operations.
( c ) *Effective dates.* This section is effective at 7 a.m. and terminates at 5 p.m. local time annually, on Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday of the third weekend of March.
[CGD07-96-063, 62 FR 7937, Feb. 21, 1997, as amended by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36327, July 2, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.31 Discharges: Chemical additives.

No person may use a chemical additive to circumvent the discharge requirements in §§ 157.27, 157.29, 157.37, 157.39, and 157.43.
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.100 What does this subpart do?

This subpart provides requirements for pollution equipment on deepwater ports.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350:AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, William S. Urkiel, Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   August 16, 2004

|/s/ WILLIAM S. URKIELWilliam S. Urkiel                      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---