Paul Sweigert
6205 Providence Dr ive Carpentersville, IL 60110

847

- 844

- 8491 Paulsweigert@comcast.net

7/6/2015

Hon. Michael Huerta
Administrator
Federal Aviation Administration U. S. Department of Transp ortation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Summary Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from certain parts of the FARs.

Dear Administrator Huerta:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Paul H Sweigert (or the “Petitioner”), hereby applies for a summary exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow him to operate small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“UAS”) for aerial video and data collection, under the conditions and limitations set forth in this Petition.

The requested exemption would permit the operation of small, unmanned and relatively inex pensive UAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is (1) limited, (2) predetermined, and (3) would provide safety enhancements to the already safe news gathering operations presently using manned helicopters and airplanes. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the FAA Administrator’s responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant:

Paul H Sweigert
6205 Providence Dr. Carpentersville, IL 60110

847

- 844

- 8491 paulsweigert@comcast.net

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 CFR Part 21 14 C.F.R. § 45.23(b)
14 CFR § 61. 3 14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a) 14 CFR § 91.9 (b) (2)
14 C.F.R. § 91.103 14 C.F.R. § 91.10914 C.F. R. § 91.119 14 C.F.R. § 91.121 14 CFR § 91.151 (a) 14 CFR § 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR § 91.205(b)
14 CFR § 91.215 14 CFR § 91.405 (a) 14 CFR § 407 (a) (1) 14 CFR § 409 (a) (2) 14 CFR § 417 (a) & (b) 3

The Appendix describes the FARs from which an exemption is requested and summarizes the justification for each requested exemption.

The Petition is submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal under Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of t he Reform Act. In making this determination, the Administrator must determine which types of UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national security in light of the following:

• The UAS’s size, weight, speed, a nd operational capability; • Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and • Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.

Reform Act § 333 (a).

If the Administrator determines that such vehicles “ma y operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. § 333(c) (emphasis added). The Secretary has delegated his aviation authority to the Administrator of the FAA. The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to grant exemptions from its regulatory requirements for civil aircraft, a term defined under §40101 of the Act, which includes UASs. The Administrator may grant an

e xemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections

44702

- 44716 of the Federal Aviation Act if Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f) See also 49 USC § 4 4711(a); 49 USC § 44704; 14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1).

Summary of Request:

As a long time radio control pilot, I am requesting an exemption, and permission to use my UAS, DJI Flame Wheel 450 (further in this report are the detailed specifications of the UAS), for the purpose of taking aerial photos and videos for the home inspection / insurance business, professional videography and for the home sales business in the suburbs of the greater Chicago area. This is a technology that is perfect for realtors, home inspectors and property owners who wish to get a better perspective of the home and or neighborhood th ey are interested in

. Roof inspections for example can be done much safer than ever before. Homeowner s would now have the ability

to see video of their p roperty from a perspective never seen before. These videos would be extremely affordable compared to years before.

Why the exemption would not adversely affect safety:

This can be done very safely in a controlled environment, on private property, with li mited airtime required, extremely low noise, in uncongested areas. I fly with very short time limits (6 minutes max,) in a very small area usually under 100 feet and always fly under the AMA guidelines.Prior to flight,

 Verify weather conditions are favo rable for safe operation , clear visibility , low or no wind.

 Map out flying area, create flight plan

 Select a takeoff area free of obstacles mindfully of the possibility of using the “Return to Home” function, place UAS in a safe position on the ground for takeoff

 Verify propellers are properly secured and not damaged.

 ensure all batteries are fully charged, UAS battery, Transmitter

, FPV receiver battery

 verify there are 6 or more satellites acquired

 verbally warn of takeoff

 hover at 10

– 15 feet and veri fy all controls are operating properly While in flight,

 Fly well under 400 feet.

 Always fly “line of sight”

 Never fly over people

 I am always aware of my location and have a backup plan available in case of emergency

 Use a spotter

 Monitor my battery use

W

hile landing,

 Make sure landing spot is clear

 Verbally warn of upcoming landing

 Disconnect battery after landing

 Record battery usage and remaining voltage

Description of UAS:

DJI F450

DJI Flame Wheel 450 (F450)

 Frame Weight 282g

 Diagonal Wheelbase 450mm

 Takeoff Weight 1600g

 NAZA

– M Lite flight control system, which includes Gyro, Compass, GPS.*

 Spectrum DX6i 2.4GHz transmitter

 Orange Rx R620 DSM2 Compatible Full Range 6Ch 2.4Ghz Receiver w/Failsafe

 Action Camera 1080i mounted on a two axis gimbal.

 FPV transmitter (5.8GHz), receiver and monitor mounted on DX6i transmitter, all of which comply with FCC requirements.

* Naza M Lite safety features include the following.

 “Failsafe” function, where if signal is lost, or interference occurs with th e controller, or it flies out of range, the UAS will automatically return to its “home” position.

 “GPS hold

- auto hover” if radio control sticks are released.

 “Return to Home” function, if at any time you lose orientation or you are unable to finish t he flight, the RTH system can be triggered and the UAS will fly and safely land in its original takeoff spot.

Pilot in Command (PIC) Background and experience:

I have 6 years’ experience in flying radio control airplanes, helicopters and quad copters and have about 20 hours of flight time using the DJI Flame Wheel F

- 450. I have always been an extremely responsible UAS pilot and am ingreat health. I fly UAVs every weekend and regularly train on a simulator during bad weather

. Although motion sickness pre vents me from piloting a real aircraft, I am able to experience the excitement of flight through flying model RC aircraft. Videography has been a long time hobby of mine and I have always had a fascination with
aerial video. I enjoy taking aerial videos, editing them down, packaging them in a media format such as a DVD. I have done such videos for family members , friends and neighbors, all have been very happy with the end product

. In the future I would like to apply for employment as a UAV pilot and I bel ieve that getting this exemption would
be an asset. I hold a valid driver’s lic ense from the State of Illinois and have a clean driving record.

Why the public would be served by granting this exemption:

I believe this new technology can help businesse s perform inherently dangerous tasks in a much safer way. The home inspection industry for one is anxious to have this technology to enhance their ability to safely inspect properties; no longer would a person be required to physically walk on a roof to i nspect it. In addition “Drones” are very popular now, especially with the younger generation; aerial wedding video for example has seen quite an increase in demand. I would like to play a part in these new trends. Also I believe it could potentially increa se home sales, benefiting realtors, buyers and sellers alike. There are so many uses, to many to list.

The Petition to use a UAS for aerial data collection and its proposed limitations are similar in all material respects to those approved by the FAA in G rants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Dock et No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642) and 11310 to Colin Hinkle (see
Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0608). In th ose grants the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the Petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, 11213, and 11310 also apply to the situation presented by this Petition. Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully Submitted,

Paul SweigertAPPENDIX



### FAR section Subject Justification 14 CFR § 45.23(b) Requirement to display registration
number on vehicle In sufficient space on vehicle

14 CFR Part 21 Aircraft certification requirements and procedures Designed for manned aircraft; not
suitable for off

- the

- shelf UAS 14 CFR § 61.3 Requirement for pilot certificate Part 61 requirements designed for
manned aircraft, not UAS; petition describes training for UAS operator

14 CFR § 91.7 (a) Airworthiness requirement Designed for manned aircraft; not
suitable for off

- the

- shelf UAS 14 CFR § 91.9 (b) (2) Requirement for manual to be available in the cockpit No one aboard to read manual

14 CFR § 91.103(b) Requirement for crew members to be
onboard Unmanned vehicle

14 CFR § 91.109 Requirement for dual controls during flight instruction No one aboard to operate controls

14 CFR § 91.119 Minimum altitu des for safe flight Safety requires operation below these
altitudes 14 CFR § 91.121 Altimeter settings No one aboard to read altimeter 14 CFR § 91.151(a) Fuel requirements Vehicle does not use fuel 14 CFR § 91.203 (a) & (b) Requirement for regi stration and
airworthiness certificates to be
onboard No one aboard to read certificates

14 CFR § 91.205(b) Cockpit instruments No one aboard to read 14 CFR § 91.215 Transponder requirement Vehicle has insufficient useful load; will be operated be low ATC radar

coverage 14 CFR § 91.405 (a) Inspection requirements Designed for manned aircraft; not
suitable for off

- the

- shelf UAS 14 CFR § 91.407(a) (1) Inspection approval requirements Designed for manned aircraft; not
suitable for off

- the

- shelf UAS 14 CFR § 91.409 (a) (2) Airworthiness inspection Designed for manned aircraft; not
suitable for off

- the

- shelf UAS 14 CFR § 91.417 (a) & (b) Maintenance records requirements Designed for manned aircraft; not suitable for off

the

- shelf UAS