alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**PROMISSORY
NOTE**
 
 
 **Principal
amount $ 50,000.00**       **March 11, 2005**
 
 
 FOR VALUE
RECEIVED, the undersigned, eRXSYS Incorporated, hereinafter referred to as
“Borrower”, located at 18021 Sky Park Circle, Suite G2, Irvine, CA 92614, hereby
jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Weil Consulting
Corporation, a California Company with its principal place of business at 234
South Hamilton Drive, Suite 209, Beverly Hills, CA 90211, hereinafter referred
to as “Lender”, the sum of FIFTY THOUSAND Dollars ($50,000.00), together with
interest thereon at the rate of 7.5% (Wall Street Journal Prime Rate of 5.5%
[March 11, 2005] plus 2%) per annum on the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be
paid in 60 days in the manner following:
 **60 DAY LOAN PROGRAM**
  Loan
      Amount= $50,000.00
    March
      11, 2005Payment
      in 60 Days= $50,625.00
    May
      11, 2005
   All
payments shall be first applied to interest and the balance to principal. This
note may be prepaid, at any time, in whole or in part, without
penalty.
 
 This note
shall at the option of any holder thereof be immediately due and payable upon
the occurrence of any of the following: 1) Failure to make any payment due
hereunder within 30 days of its due date. 2) Breach of any condition of any
security interest, loan agreement, pledge agreement or guarantee granted as
collateral security for this note.
 
 The
undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as endorsers, guarantors
or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until this note shall be fully paid and
waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices hereto and further agree
to remain bound, notwithstanding any extension, modification, waiver, or other
indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or exchange,
substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for this note. No
modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding unless in
writing; and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be an indulgence for
any other or future occasion. Any modification of change in terms, hereunder
granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon each of the
undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the undersigned, and
each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant to each of the others a
power of attorney to enter into any such modification on their behalf. The
rights of any holder hereof shall be cumulative and necessarily successive. This
note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and shall be construed, governed
and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
California.
 
 
 /s/
Weil Consulting Corp/Douglas
Weil/President                                                        /s/ Robert J.
DelVecchio                  
       CEO
 Lendor      Date   Borrower
- Robert J.
DelVecchio Title
 Weil
Consulting Corp. / Douglas Weil    on behalf of eRXSYS Inc.
 President
 
   1
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of BSI2000, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:August
                5, 2005
            **BSI2000,
                INC.**By:*/s/
                Jack Harper*Name:Jack
                HarperTitle:
                Principal Accounting Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to BSI2000, Inc. and will be retained by
      BSI2000, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32(a)**





**TXU
      ELECTRIC DELIVERY TRANSITION BOND COMPANY LLC**


**Certificate
      Pursuant to Section 906**


**of
      Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO**











The
      undersigned, T. L. Baker, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of TXU
      Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY
      CERTIFY that:




1.
            The
                Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
                2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2.
            Information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
      this
      20th  day
      of
      March, 2007.






/s/
                T. L. BakerName:
            T.
                L. BakerTitle:
            Chairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive



























































A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TXU Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC and will be retained by TXU
      Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7993

KEITH M. WALTON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00062-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges ∗

.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith M. Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

∗ The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).2 PER CURIAM: Keith M. Walton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Walton that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Walton failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Walton has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99(c)**

**QUARTERLY AFFIRMATION STATEMENT**

This Quarterly Statement is being provided pursuant to therequirement of Section 3.07(h)VIII of that certain Indenture dated as of August 21, 2003 between Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (the “Transition Bond Company”), as Issuer, and The Bank of New York, asIndenture Trustee, (as originally executed and, as from time to time supplemented or amended by one or more Series Supplements or indentures supplemental thereto entered into pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Indenture, as so supplementedor amended, or both, the “Indenture”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Appendix A of the Indenture. 

I, John M. Casey, hereby certify that I am the Treasurer of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (“Oncor”), the parent company of the TransitionBond Company, and the servicer of the transition bonds under that certain Series 2003-1 Transition Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2003 and that certain Series 2004-1 Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as ofJune 7, 2004 between the Transition Bond Company and Oncor. 

I hereby affirm that, in all material respects, for each materiallysignificant REP for which Oncor provided electric delivery transmission and distribution services for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2008, (a) each REP has been billed in compliance with the requirements outlined in the FinancingOrder; (b) each REP has made payments in compliance with the requirements outlined in the Financing Order; and (c) each REP satisfies the creditworthiness requirements of the Financing Order. 

DATED as of December 31, 2008
§ 26.01 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to implement the provisions of the Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Radiotelephone Act. This part: ( 1 ) Requires the use of the vessel bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone;
( 2 ) Provides the Coast Guard's interpretation of the meaning of important terms in the Act;
( 3 ) Prescribes the procedures for applying for an exemption from the Act and the regulations issued under the Act and a listing of exemptions.
( b ) Nothing in this part relieves any person from the obligation of complying with the rules of the road and the applicable pilot rules.
----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Albert L. Eilender                                                             |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)November 5, 2010 |   |
# Instructions

# Tracking Sheet

# Class Assessment

&18Class Assessment
§ 20.307 Complaints. ( a ) The complaint must set forth— ( 1 ) The type of case;
( 2 ) The statute or rule allegedly violated;
( 3 ) The pertinent facts alleged; and
( 4 ) ( i ) The amount of the class II civil penalty sought; or
( ii ) The order of suspension or revocation proposed.
( b ) The Coast Guard shall propose a place of hearing when filing the complaint.
( c ) The complaint must conform to the requirements of this subpart for filing and service.
§ 162.15 Manhasset Bay, N.Y.; seaplane restricted area. ( a ) *The restricted area.* An area in Manhasset Bay between the shore at Manorhaven on the north and the southerly limit line of the special anchorage area in Manhasset Bay, west area at Manorhaven (described in § 110.60 of this chapter), on the south; its axis being a line bearing 166°50′ true from latitude 40°50′17.337 N, longitude 73°43′03.877 W, which point is on the south side of Orchard Beach Boulevard at Manorhaven; and being 100 feet wide for a distance of 380 feet in a southerly direction from the south side of Orchard Beach Boulevard, and thence flaring to a width of 300 feet at the southerly limit line.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Vessels shall not anchor or moor within the restricted area.
( 2 ) All vessels traversing the area shall pass directly through without unnecessary delay, and shall give seaplanes the right-of-way at all times.
[CGD 75-082, 42 FR 51759, Sept. 29, 1977, as amended by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35016, June 19, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Care 
Financing Administration (HCFA).

ACTION: Notice To Delete Three Systems of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Health Care Financing Administration is deleting three 
systems of records from its inventory subject to the Privacy Act of 
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The deletions will be effective on June 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The public should address comments to: Director, Division of 
Data Liaison and Distribution, HCFA, Room N2-04-27, 7500 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850. The telephone number is 
(410) 786-3673. Comments received will be available for review at this 
location, by appointment, during regular business hours, Monday through 
Friday from 9 a.m.-3 p.m., eastern time zone.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ``Medicare Enrollment Records Statistics 
(MERS),'' System No. 09-70-0006, was established to study the 
characteristics of persons enrolled in the Medicare program and 
establish the basis for Medicare services utilization rates. The 
``Health Insurance Enrollment Statistics (HIES), General Enrollment 
Period,'' System No. 09-70-0007 was established to contact persons 
eligible for Part B benefits who had refused or withdrawn coverage of 
these benefits, for purposes of re-enrollment for Part B coverage and 
to evaluate results of such contacts. The ``Medicare Beneficiary 
Correspondence Files (MBC),'' System No. 09-70-0509 was established to 
maintain and track correspondence in a HCFA component that no longer 
exist. All of these systems are being deleted from HCFA's inventory 
because they are no longer used. Retention and destruction of the data 
contained in these systems has been in accordance with the retention 
and disposal schedules listed in the system notice.

Deletions

    No. 09-70-0006 ``Medicare Enrollment Records Statistics (MERS),'' 
HHS/HCFA/BDMS;
    No. 09-70-0007 ``Health Insurance Enrollment Statistics (HIES), 
General Enrollment Period,'' HHS/HCFA/BDMS.
    No. 09-70-0509 ``Medicare Beneficiary Correspondence Files (MBC),'' 
HHS/HCFA/BPO;

    Dated: May 26, 2000.
Nancy-Ann Min DeParle,
Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-14071 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-U
§ 230.26 General considerations in preparing Corps EISs. ( a ) *Interdisciplinary preparation.* See (40 CFR 1502.6).
( b ) *Incorporation by reference.* To the maximum extent practicable, the EIS should incorporate material by reference in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.21. Footnotes should be used only where their use greatly aids the reader's understanding of the point discussed. Citation in the EIS of material incorporated by reference should be made by indicating an author's last name and date of the reference in parentheses at the appropriate location in the EIS. The list of references will be placed at the end of the EIS. Only information sources actually cited in the text should appear in the reference list. The reference list should include the author's name, the date and title of the publication, personal communications and type of communication (e.g., letter, telephone, interview, etc.).
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 15
 
Exhibit 15--Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information
 
Board of Directors
AmSouth Bancorporation
 
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and in their related Prospectuses, of our report dated May 10, 1999
relating to the unaudited consolidated financial statements of AmSouth
Bancorporation and subsidiaries which are included in its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1999:
 
  Form S-3 No. 33-55683 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common
         Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-52243 pertaining to the assumption by AmSouth
         Bancorporation of FloridaBank Stock Option Plan and FloridaBank
         Stock Option Plan-1993;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-52113 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive
         Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-35218 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive
         Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-37905 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-2927 (as amended) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase
         Plan;
 
  Form S-3 No. 33-35280 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common
         Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-58777 pertaining to the Director Restricted Stock Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-02099 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift
         Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-05631 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation 1996 Long
         Term Incentive Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-27107 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Employee
         Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-41599 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Deferred
         Compensation Plan and the Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation
         Plan for Directors of AmSouth Bancorporation;
 
  Form S-3 No. 333-44263 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Shelf
         Registration Statement; and
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-76283 pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Outside
         Directors.
 
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a
part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of Sections 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
May 5, 1999
# ToC

# B-6 BC-Comp full by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# B-6 BC-Comp full by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints by Region for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# A Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# B Access to Information

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# C Admission, Transfer, Disch

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# D Choice, Privacy

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# E Financial, Property

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# F Care

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# G Rehab or Maint of Function

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# H Restraints

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# I Activities & Social Services

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# J Dietary

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# K Environment

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# L Policies, Procedures

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# M Staffing

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# N Certification Agency

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# O State Medicaid Agency

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P	

# P System, Others

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&12Table B-6: Complaints for Fiscal Year 2012	

Table B-6: p. &P
#### § 166.100 Purpose.

The purpose of these regulations is to establish and designate shipping safety fairways and fairway anchorages to provide unobstructed approaches for vessels using U.S. ports.

[CGD 81-80a, 48 FR 30110, June 30, 1983]
#### WILLIAM P. BAKEN, Survivor, etc., Appellant, *v.*EUNICE C. HARDER, Respondent.

*Married woman—charging separate estate.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

Upon a former appeal in this action from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the judgment was reversed, upon the ground that the plaintiff’s claim was for the benefit and advantage of defendant’s husband, and in no respect for the benefit of her separate estate, and that she had not charged her separate estate with the payment of the debt. Upon this appeal the General Term were of the opinion that the cases of *Maxon*v. *Scott*
      ***
      **and *Kelty*v. *Long,*
      † were not in conflict with the'former decision of the court in this case, and, as the facts upon which it was presented were substantially the same, affirmed the judgment.

*D. Magone, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*Vary & Stone,*for the respondent.

55 N. Y., 247.

8 S. C. (1 Hun), 714; S. C., 4 N. Y. S. C., 163.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

James, J., dissented.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.