alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7430 RONNIE MILLER, a/k/a Brian Coles, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-02329) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronnie Miller appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Miller’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Baltimore County Dept of Corr , No. 1:07-cv-02329 (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Secured  Financial  Network,  Inc.,
formerly 12 to 20 Plus, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Brian  Schultz,  in my  capacity as  Principal
Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 12, 2005                              /s/ Brian Schultz
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Brian Schultz
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 31(e)1**

**MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Anthony J. Topazi, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 7, 2007

/s/Anthony J. Topazi

Anthony J. Topazi

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### RENSSELAER R. MOORE, Respondent, *v.*JOHN McCARTHY, Appellant.

*Lease—extension*of— *surrender.*

This action was brought to recover rent, alleged to be due upon a sealed lease, ' whereby the defendant leased of the plaintiff certain premises for the term of three years from January 1,1869, with the privilege of three years more, after the termination of the first term. The defendant entered and occupied the premises for fifteen months; he then, having paid the rent to that date, left the premises, one Kinny being in possession with plaintiff’s knowledge. Kinny continued to occupy, paying rent to the plaintiff, till May 8,1872, when he left, delivering the key to the plaintiff, who accepted it and subsequently rented a portion of the premises. *Held*(1), that the holding over of Kinny did not constitute an election on the part of the defendant to extend the term; (2), that accepting the key and re-renting the premises was a surrender and termination of the lease, at least from the time of the re-renting, if not from the time of accepting the key.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon" the report of a referee.

*Churchill & Nutting,*for the appellant.

*Waters & Sands,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

James, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
EXHIBIT
        31.1                                           
Certifications
 
  I,
        Thomas
        Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of Worlds.com Inc. certify that:
 
 1.
        I have
        reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
        "Company");
 
 2.
        Based
        on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
        fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in
        light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
        with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
        Based
        on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
        included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
        condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and
        for,
        the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
        The
        Company's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing
        and
        maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
        Rules
        13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 a) Designed
        such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
        and
        procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
        information relating to the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
        is
        made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period
        in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated
        the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, and
        presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
        disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
        this
        report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed
        in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
        reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal period that
        has
        materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
        internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
        The
        Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
        recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
        Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
        functions):
 
 a)
        all
        significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
        of
        internal controls which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
        Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data;
        and
 
 b)
        any
        fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
        who
        have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.
 
 Date:
        May
        10, 2008
 
 /s/
        Thomas Kidrin
 Thomas
        Kidrin
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2


                         AERO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aero Systems
Engineering, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, I,
Charles H. Loux, President and CEO, of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

3.   This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

4.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: October 31, 2002           /s/ Charles Loux
                                  --------------------------------
                                  Charles H. Loux, President and CEO
                                  Aero Systems Engineering, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-22671-CV-ALTONAGA

DELIO BATISTA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a telephonic hearing has been scheduled on July 7, 2023,

at 2:00 p.m. All counsel, including both Mr. Tropp and Mr. Cueto, are required to appear. The 

parties shall appear by phone and are instructed to call 1-888-684-8852 on the date and time set 

forth above. The access code is 3156459 and the password is 5510. For clarity, please do not 

use a cell phone or a speaker phone. 

Date: July 7, 2023

 ANGELA E. NOBLE, CLERK

 By: /s/ Warren Condon_____ 

 Courtroom Deputy for the

 Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga

 (305) 523-5515

 

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
"Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Christopher
Ryan
 Christopher
Ryan
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 Date: November
11, 2009
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Kerry Anne O'Shea, Rumson, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1745 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to September 14, 2019, and upon reading the November 1, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan], 173 AD3d 1602, 1603 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1051 [2018]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark and Pritzker, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<MULTIPLIER>                                                               1

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                               221,141
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        535,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          23,000
<INVENTORY>                                                        1,126,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   2,647,655
<PP&E>                                                             3,058,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     1,481,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     5,766,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              4,537,868
<BONDS>                                                              706,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           343,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       5,766,892
<SALES>                                                              987,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   1,144,134
<CGS>                                                                947,831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        947,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    94,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (1,240,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (422,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (818,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (818,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          (6.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (6.75)



</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02031

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02031\02031_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02031\02031_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02031\02031_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02031\02031_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02031\02031_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02031\Certification Statement Plant ID 02031.pdf Plant certification statement

02031\Supplemental Documents\02031_Astoria Energy Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02031\Supplemental Documents\02031_Astoria Energy Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02031\Supplemental Documents\02031_Part E.pdf PDF copy of Plant submitted survey file

x 02031\Supplemental Documents\02031_Part H.pdf PDF copy of Plant submitted survey file

x 02031\Supplemental Documents\02031_Section A.pdf PDF copy of Plant submitted survey file

02031\Supplemental Documents\Astoria Energy EA\02031_AE Phase I ESA 2007 Part I.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\Astoria Energy EA\02031_AE Phase I ESA 2007 Part II.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\Astoria Energy EA\02031_AE Phase I ESA 2007 Part III.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02031\Supplemental Documents\Astoria Energy EA\02031_AE Phase I ESA 2007 Part V.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\Astoria Energy EA\02031_AE Phase I ESA Part I No Pix.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\Astoria Energy EA\02031_AE Phase I ESA Part IV.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\SPDES DMR\02031_Dec 2009.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\SPDES DMR\02031_Feb 2010 with Signature.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\SPDES DMR\02031_July 2010 DMR.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\SPDES DMR\02031_March 2010 with Signature.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02031\Supplemental Documents\SPDES DMR\02031_SPDES Jan 2010 with Signature.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.12a Certification of certain Type III devices. ( a ) The purpose of this section is to provide regulations for certification of certain Type III devices.
( b ) Any Type III device is considered certified under this section if: ( 1 ) It is used solely for the storage of sewage and flushwater at ambient air pressure and temperature; and
( 2 ) It is in compliance with § 159.53(c).
( c ) Any device certified under this section need not comply with the other regulations in this part except as required in paragraphs (b)(2) and (d) of this section and may not be labeled under § 159.16.
( d ) Each device certified under this section which is installed aboard an inspected vessel must comply with § 159.97.
[CGD 76-145, 42 FR 11, Jan. 3, 1977]
Exhibit 31(a)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Alan R. Abrams, certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Servidyne, Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;   b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materialaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and   b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: March 17, 2008 /s/ Alan R. Abrams   Alan R. Abrams   Chief Executive Officer