alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 22-8336-BER 

 

IN RE: 

SEALED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 

_________________________________/ 

MOTION TO SEAL 

 The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States 

Attorney, hereby requests this Honorable Court to seal the attached Criminal Complaint, Affidavit, 

and supporting documentation with the exception of a copy of the Warrant for Arrest to be 

provided to the U.S. Marshals Service and law enforcement agent whose name is noted on the 

Arrest Warrant, relative to the above captioned matter until such time as the defendant is arrested 

or until further order of the Court. The defendant is a target of an on-going investigation and early 

release of the complaint and related documents would compromise the investigation and could 

lead those involved in the crime to elude law enforcement. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: s/A. Marie Villafaña 

A. Marie Villafaña 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 0018255 

500 South Australian Avenue 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

Tel: (561) 820-8711 

Fax: (561) 820-8777 

ann.marie.villafana@usdoj.gov 

 

TM Aug 5, 2022 West Palm Beach

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4802

To clarify Congressional intent regarding the relationship between State and

Federal law governing controlled substances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. SOUDER (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. NORWOOD, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr.

FOLEY, Mr. BAKER, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. MCCOLLUM, and Mr. MICA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

A BILL

To clarify Congressional intent regarding the relationship

between State and Federal law governing controlled substances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That it is hereby expressly declared that it is the intent

4 of the Congress to supersede any and all laws of the States

5 and units of local government insofar as they may now

6 or hereafter effectively permit or purport to authorize the

7 use, growing, manufacture, distribution, or importation by
2

•HR 4802 IH

1 an individual or group of marijuana or any controlled sub2 stance which differs from the provisions of the Controlled

3 Substances Act and the Controlled Substances Import and

4 Export Act or regulations issued pursuant thereto. Any

5 law, regulation, or ordinance purporting to establish such

6 different requirement, prohibition, or standard shall be

7 null and void.

Æ
RE: Additional Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: Bill Maxwell 

 03/09/2011 03:16 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland 

 

I believe the commenter is referring to the following sections: 

IV. Summary of this Proposed NESHAP 

 G. What emission limitations and work practice standards must I meet? 

 H. What are the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) requirements? 

 I. What are the testing requirements? 

Please let me know if you have additional questions. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:05 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Re: Additional Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 

Cortney -- 

Thanks. I've distributed the comments to the appropriate staff. 

One question on the comment: 

Is the summary of NESHAP requirements that appear on pages 316-321 

complete? To the extent that this is not a complete summary, we 

recommend that EPA provide a more complete summary of all NESHAP 

requirements at the top of section IV. 

I don't find anything on pages 316 - 321 of the February 18th draft 

preamble that applies to the question (these pages discuss the emission 

limitations). Could you clarify? 

Thanks. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

------------ 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov
To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill 

Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/09/2011 01:44 PM 

Subject: Additional Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 

Hi Bob, 

Attached you will find additional interagency comments on RIN 2060-AP52. 

Additionally, the comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of 

the TSDs, are forthcoming. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thanks! 

Cortney 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov 

[attachment "Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT 

under EO 12866 Interagency Review_ 03 09 2011.doc" deleted by Bill 

Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Guang Zhou Sheng Wei Dian Zi Shang Wu You 

Xian Gong Si, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated 

Associations Identified on Schedule “A”, 

 Defendants. / 

CASE No.: 22-cv-61622 

Judge: Roy K. Altman 

Magistrate Judge: Patrick M. Hunt 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 Plaintiff, Guang Zhou Sheng Wei Dian Zi Shang Wu You Xian Gong Si, by and through 

undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby voluntarily dismisses 

Defendant No. 1 Dingren, Defendant No. 7 QingCheng, Defendant No. 10 Qianmian, Defendant 

No. 13 Xingmian, Defendant No. 15 Ningzhi, without prejudice. 

Dated October 27, 2022. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Andrew J. Palmer 

Andrew J. Palmer 

Jared W. Gasman Attorney, P.A. 

5353 N. Federal Highway, Suite 402 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 

Phone: 954-771-7050 

ajpalmer@gasmanlaw.com 

dkang@gasmanlaw.com 

Case 0:22-cv-61622-RKA Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2022 Page 1 of 1
Hillsborough

No. 7970

#### Deirdre R. Angwin Constance Van Houten Marge Doris Burns Mary Donovan The Manchester Education Association v. City of Manchester

May 9, 1978

*McLane, Graf, Greene, Raulerson & Middleton P.A.*of Manchester *(Jack B. Middleton*and *Robert E. Jauron*by brief and *Mr. Middleton*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*Elmer T. Bourque,*of Manchester, city solicitor, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

per curiam

Petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs request the court to declare unconstitutional and unenforceable chapter 18, sections 18-30, 18-31 and 18-32 of the ordinances of the city of Manchester because these sections require teachers and others employed in the Manchester school system to reside within the boundaries of the city. The Court *(Batchelder,*J.) reserved and transferred all questions of law without ruling. We rule that the requested relief should be granted.

The ordinance herein involved was adopted on April 17, 1977. The parties agree that for all intents and purposes (save for a grand*337father clause) the ordinance is essentially identical to the one we invalidated in *Donnelly v. Manchester,*111 N.H. 50, 274 A.2d 789 (1971), wherein the city also attempted to impose continuing-residence requirements on its municipal employees. The defendant city apparently reenacted such a residence requirement for municipal employees in response to *McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Commission,*424 U.S. 645 (1976). In *McCarthy,*the United States Supreme Court upheld the federal constitutional validity of such a continuing-residence requirement imposed by the city on municipal firemen. The defendant would have us reexamine our decision in *Donnelly*and overrule it on the basis of *McCarthy.*We refuse to do so.

*Donnelly v. Manchester*was based on both our State and Federal Constitutions. We are not circumscribed by standards set forth in *McCarthy*if we grant individuals more rights than are called for by federal constitutional minima. *State v. Hogg,*118 N.H. 262, 385 A.2d 844 (1978); see *State v. Leclair,*118 N.H. 214, 385 A.2d 831 (1978). This we clearly have done. The city urges that we adopt the so-called rational basis test, which requires only that the statute or ordinance in question be rationally related to a legitimate governmental objective. We are not persuaded by defendant’s several arguments, nor are we convinced that the recited “public purposes” amount to “a public interest which is important enough to justify the restriction on the private right.” *Donnelly v. Manchester,*111 N.H. at 52, 274 A.2d at 791.

We affirm *Donnelly*and hold that the ordinance is offensive to our State Constitution and therefore unconstitutional.

*Remanded.*
Exhibit D

Statement of Claim

Plaintiff Toni Gad

Unpaid Overtime Wages Weeks1

Average

Weekly 

Hours

Worked1

Payroll

Hourly

Rate1

Average

Weekly

Hourly

Pay1

Average

Weekly

Non-Hourly

Pay1

FLSA

Equivalent

Hourly Rate1

FLSA

Applicable

Overtime

Hourly Rate1

Total

Unpaid

Overtime

Wages1

Total

Liquidated

Damages1

12/26/21 - 7/20/22 29.57 44.8 $ 20.00 $ 795.03 $ 923.13 $ 40.61 $ 60.91 $5,867.59 $ 5,867.59

12/8/21 - 12/25/21 2.57 48.75 $ 20.00 $ 875.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 41.54 $ 62.31 $ 724.45 $ 724.45

10/15/21 - 12/7/21 7.71 53.75 $ 20.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 42.33 $ 63.49 $2,630.48 $ 2,630.48

$9,222.52 $ 9,222.52

Total Unpaid Overtime Wages1 = $ 9,222.52

Total Liquidated Damages1 = $ 9,222.52

Total1 = $ 18,445.04

Period1

1 Numbers are averages, estimates, and/or approximates. Numbers may change as information is uncovered through the discovery

process.

Case 0:22-cv-61574-AHS Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2022 Page 1 of 1
Make Your

MARK!
U' 

UNITED TACONITE FLOW SHEET No. 4: Rev 1 

EXCO CONCENTRATOR (L" 1nes 3 4 & 5) FINE ORE SURGE 

' ' 

• TAILS icOBBER MAGNETIC SEPARATOR:· LINE #3 ROD MILLI 

CONC. 2000 HP 

SPIRAL 

CLASSIFIER I BALL MILL 

O'FLOW' 5000 HP f 

COARSE TAILS :ROUGHER MAGNETIC SEPARATOR! TAILS 

CONC f 

U'FLOW' TAILINGS I CYCLONES - HYDROSEPARATOR O'FLOW' f f H2 0 

FLOW' O'FLOW' DE'w' ATERING 

O'FLOW' I CONCENTRATE I TAILS MAGNETIC 

IHYDROSEPARATORI SEPARATOR 

CONC • TO REGRIND 

O'SIZE CYCLONES 

I FINE SCREENS <SEE SHEET 3) 

U'SIZE f ALTERNATIVE 

TAILS 

I FINISHER MAGNETIC SEPARATOR I O'SIZE 

300 FT - ALTERNATE.- DERRICK SCREENS~ THICKENER CONC 

IFINAL CONCENTRATE 

U'SIZE 

U'FLOW' I SUMP 

• 

LINE #4 CONCENTRAT 

LINE #5 CONCENTRAT 

O'FLOW' 

THICKENER! ETCO CONCENTRATE TAILINGS 1

PELLET PLANT SEE SHEET 3 

POND O'FLOW' TO ' PROCESS 'dATER U'FLOW' TO FILTERS 

E 

E
#### § 3.85-10 Sector: Southeast Alaska Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zones.

Sector Southeast Alaska's office is located in Juneau, AK. The boundaries of Sector Southeast Alaska Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zones start at latitude 60°01′18′′ N, longitude 142°00′00′′ W, proceeding northeast to the EEZ near the Canadian border at latitude 60°18′24′′ N, longitude 141°00′00′′ W; thence south and east along the EEZ on the United States-Canadian shore side boundary to the intersection of the Canadian coast and the Coast Guard District Seventeen southern border at latitude 54°40′00′′ N, longitude 131°15′06′′ W; thence west along the southern border of Coast Guard District Seventeen to the intersection with the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 54°38′11′′ N, longitude 140°01′26′′ W; thence north along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 56°14′50′′ N, longitude 142°00′00′′ W; thence north to the point of origin.

[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36326, July 2, 2007, as amended by USCG-2023-0811, 88 FR 69036, Oct. 5, 2023]
EXHIBIT 

31.1 

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, George Lefevre, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2006.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report; and 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

 

 

| Dated: February 13, 2007 | By:/s/			George LeFevre                        			

      George Lefevre CEO |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
2019 Annual Conference Agenda

Time Session

7:45am – 9:30am Registration Opens

8:00am – 8:45am Optional Morning Networking Activity

8:45am – 9:00am Welcome & Opening Remarks 

9:00am – 10:00am

Keynote Address: Ombuds as Consumers of Applied Science

• Dr. Thomas A. Van Dillen, Command 

Psychologist and Director of the Command Readiness 

Health Research Directorate, United States Army 

HQ Intelligence and Security Command

10:00am – 10:15am Morning Break

10:15am – 11:45am Speed Mentoring/Networking

11:45am – 1:00pm Lunch

1:00pm – 2:00pm

Plenary 1: Everyone Communicates, Few Connect

• Raymond Campbell, Director, Diversity and Equal 

Opportunity, Defense Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

2:05pm – 2:35pm

Plenary 2: Self-ish, Self-less, and Self-Care...Where is the 

Balance?

• Heather Milner, Assistant Ombudsman, Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau Ombudsman’s Office

2:35pm – 2:55pm Afternoon Break

2:55pm – 4:25pm

Plenary 3: 50 Shades of Conflict

• Mollie Berg, Associate Ombuds, National 

Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

• Dr. Bina Patel, Ombudsman, National Ground 

Intelligence Center

• Deanna Yuille, Associate Ombudsman, Food and 

Drug Administration Office of Conflict Prevention 

and Resolution

4:30pm – 5:00pm COFO Executive Committee Q&A Session

5:00pm Closing
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.10 Where can the operator obtain a list of Coast Guard-approved equipment?

Where equipment in this subchapter must be of an approved type, the equipment must be specifically approved by the Commandant (CG-5P) and the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center. A list of approved equipment, including all of the approval series, is available at: *http://cgmix.uscg.mil/Equipment/Default.aspx.*

[USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
Exhibit 32(b)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Airborne, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lanny H. Michael, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Airborne, Inc. and will be retained by Airborne, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|/s/ LANNY H. MICHAEL                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Lanny H. Michael Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80144-CR-Smith/Maynard(s)(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT,

Defendant.

VERDICT

We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:

COUNT 4

As to Count 4, procuring naturalization contrary to law, we find the Defendant, JOFF 

STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT:

G GUILTY G NOT GUILTY

SO SAY WE ALL:

___________________________________ ______________________

Foreperson (please sign) Date

West Palm Beach, Florida

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 169-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
      32.2


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Christopher
      Ryan


Christopher
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Offer Letter, between Gigamon LLC and Kenneth A. Goldman



 Exhibit 10.9 

 

					
	



	  		  	 Gigamon
 598 Gibraltar Dr., Milpitas, CA 95035
 T.
408.263.2022 F. 408.263.2023
 www.gigamon.com

	  	  
	  	  
	  	  

 February 7, 2011 
 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL 
 Dear Ken: 

On behalf of the entire Board of Gigamon LLC (the “Company”), I am delighted to invite you to join us as a Director of the Company, subject to
approval of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). The responsibilities of Board Members and our general governance policies are described in our “Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Gigamon LLC”. This letter describes
a summary of the financial terms of this offer, but you will also be eligible for protection under the Company’s director and officer liability insurance policies. 
 Your cash compensation as a Director will include a paid Board meeting fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended in person or via telephone. For each Board meeting attended in person, all travel and
out of pocket expenses will be paid or reimbursed by Company. 
 Upon the effective date of your election to the Board, you will be granted an
option to purchase up to 210,000 units of the Company’s Performance Units at a $0.05 Base Value (as defined in the Plan) under the terms and conditions set forth in the grant agreement and the Company’s 2009 Performance Unit Plan (the
“Plan”). During the period of your services, the units granted will vest in equal monthly installments over 36 months. In the event of a merger or acquisition resulting in the Company not surviving, the vesting of units will be completely
accelerated. 
 In accepting this offer, you are representing to us that (i) you do not know of any conflict that would restrict you from
becoming a Director of the Company and (ii) you will not provide the Company with any documents, records or other confidential information belonging to any other parties. Nothing in this offer should be construed to interfere with or otherwise
restrict in any way the rights of the Company and its unitholders to remove any individual from the Board at any time in accordance with the provisions of applicable law. 
 To confirm your acceptance of this course of action, please sign and date one copy of this letter and return it to me in the envelope provided. 
 We look forward to your contributions as a Director. Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Ted Ho
  
 Ted Ho

	Chief Executive Officer
	
	Accepted:
	
	 /s/ Ken Goldman

	Ken Goldman
#### § 173.23 Inspection of certificate.

Each person operating a vessel to which this part applies shall present the certificate or lease or rental agreement required by § 173.21 to any Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer for inspection at his or her request.

[CGD 72-54R, 37 FR 21399, Oct. 7, 1972, as amended by USCG-2003-15404, 68 FR 37742, June 25, 2003; USCG-2003-14963, 77 FR 18700, Mar. 28, 2012]