alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11103 Conference Calendar

DON BENNY ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus L.E. FLEMING, Warden Federal Medical Center-Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CV-1144-A

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Don Benny Anderson, Federal prisoner # 060260-026, has appealed the district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging a conviction, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for conspiracy, interstate transportation to commit arson, and damaging a building with an explosive device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1952, and 844(i). Anderson contends that the trial court was without jurisdiction United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-11103 -2- because the Government failed to establish that his offense resulted in a “commercial injury” and so affected interstate commerce. Because the Government did not make such a showing, he contends, the Government lacked “standing” to prosecute him. Anderson contends that he should be permitted to pursue this claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding under the Savings Clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because this claim is based upon a novel legal theory. Anderson does not contend that the claim he wishes to assert is based upon a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense. Nor has he shown that his claim was foreclosed previously by circuit precedent. Accordingly, he has not carried his burden of showing that his claim may be asserted under the Savings Clause. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). The appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Chicago Grantee Reaches Older Veterans with Virtual WRAP®

As one of ACL’s Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) grantees, the University of 

Illinois at Chicago (UIC) provides older adults and adults with disabilities with education and tools 

to help them better manage conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, arthritis, chronic pain, and 

depression.

Its three-grant project that began in 2018 focuses on peer support using the Wellness Recovery 

Action Plan (WRAP®), a wellness and recovery approach that helps people to: 1) decrease/prevent 

troubling feelings and behaviors; 2) increase empowerment; 3) improve quality of life; and 4) 

achieve life goals. 

As just one example of working toward its goals, the grantee partnered with National Women 

Veterans United to offer WRAP® in the greater Chicagoland community. A Zoom class in July was 

attended by 10 older women veterans who found connecting with peers and creating personal 

plans to be enjoyable and effective.

In Their Words

“I learned to pay more attention to my health and well-being.” 

“Balance and support. I don’t have to be alone or do it alone.”

“How important it is to look at my lifestyle issues and make some changes.”

“It was at a much-needed time (pandemic) in life where comradery enhanced the WRAP experience.”

“Education for me is finding out what it takes for me to stay calm and balanced.”

“The time spent sharing and listening to what others do to be well.”

“I liked the fact that I felt that I was not alone with my situations.”

Participants also identified challenges they were able to address using their WRAP®, including 

managing anxiety, difficulty sleeping, COVID-19 social restrictions, and unhealthy eating.

Responding to this feedback, to help older adults with increased isolation and stress due to the 

pandemic, UIC added a Zoom “refresher” session as a touchpoint about a month after classes.

Participants shared during a refresher that the WRAP® is helping them to get out and discover 

things to do, like connecting with others and walking at the park.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2059

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JOHN WAYNE MYERS,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 25, 2002 is

corrected as follows:

On page 5, lines 7 and 8, delete ", argued them staunchly,"

On page 5, line 12, substitute "suggestion" for

"government's ardent request"
§ 2.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to define terms the Coast Guard uses in regulations, policies, and procedures, to determine whether it has jurisdiction on certain waters in cases where specific jurisdictional definitions are not otherwise provided.
( b ) Figure 2.1 is a visual aid to assist you in understanding this part.
§ 209.335 Publication. ( a ) Section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act requires publication of general notice of proposed rule making in the Federal Register (unless all persons subject thereto are named and either personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law), except to the extent that there is involved: ( 1 ) Any military, naval, or foreign affairs function of the United States or
( 2 ) any matter relating to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. Except where notice of hearing is required by statute, this requirement does not apply to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice, or in any situation in which the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.
( b ) General notice of proposed rule making published in accordance with the above will include: ( 1 ) A statement of the time, place, and nature of public rule making proceedings;
( 2 ) reference to the authority under which the rule is proposed; and
( 3 ) either the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Edward B. Cloues, II, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2006 ofK-Tron International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 7, 2006 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II     Edward B. Cloues, II   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.30 – Information Exchange","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xO6Qz2fsMk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch30\/\">Ch.30 – Information Exchange<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch30\/embed\/#?secret=xO6Qz2fsMk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.30 – Information Exchange” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"xO6Qz2fsMk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Federal ADR Resources

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Federal ADR Resources Federal ADR ResourcesADR2022-02-18T10:35:53-05:00
			
			Federal ADR ResourcesElectronic Guide to Federal Procurement ADR
SECTION VI CONTENTS
ADR Definitions
Sample ADR Training AgendasADR Definitions
Helpful definitions for each of the various ADR techniques may be found in **ADR Definitions**.
Sample ADR Training Agendas
For sample agendas for ADR training sessions, *see***Agendas.** Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
#### § 146.105 General alarm system.

Each manned facility must have a general alarm system. When operated, this system shall be audible in all parts of the structure on which provided.
§ 183.430 Conductors in circuits of less than 50 volts. ( a ) Each conductor in a circuit that has a nominal voltage of less than 50 volts must: ( 1 ) Meet the requirements of § 183.435; or
( 2 ) Meet: ( i ) The insulating material temperature rating requirements of SAE Standard J378; and
( ii ) SAE Standard J1127, or SAE Standard 1128.
( b ) This section does not apply to communication systems; electronic navigation equipment; resistance conductors that control circuit amperage; and pigtails of less than seven inches of exposed length.
[CGD 73-217, 42 FR 5944, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 87-009, 53 FR 36971, Sept. 23, 1988]
123 STAT. 1616 PUBLIC LAW 111–20—MAY 15, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 735: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Apr. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 29, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–20 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To ensure States receive adoption incentive payments for fiscal year 2008 in accordance with the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act 

of 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Incentives for the 

Adoption of Children with Special Needs Act of 2009’’. 

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION ON PAYMENTS FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2008. 

Effective as if included in the enactment of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–8), title II of division F of 

such Act is amended under the heading ‘‘CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

SERVICES PROGRAMS’’ under the heading ‘‘ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES’’, by striking ‘‘That without regard to the fiscal 

year limitations set forth in section 473A of the Social Security 

Act, from the amounts appropriated herein, the Secretary shall 

pay adoption incentives for fiscal year 2008 in the same manner 

as such incentives were awarded in fiscal year 2008 for the previous 

fiscal year: Provided further,’’. 

Approved May 15, 2009. 

Ante, p. 774. 

Effective date. 

Protecting 

Incentives for the 

Adoption of 

Children with 

Special Needs 

Act of 2009. 

May 15, 2009 

[S. 735] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLIC LAW
**Exhibit32.0**

**CERTIFICATESPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, RobertE. Conway, Chief Executive Officer of Array BioPharma Inc. (the “Company”) andR. Michael Carruthers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each herebycertify that, to the best of his knowledge and except as corrected orsupplemented in a subsequent periodic report filed pursuant to Section 13 or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),as of the date hereof:

(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedJune 30, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned haveexecuted this Certificate as of the 12th day of September, 2007.
|        |   |   /s/  Robert E. Conway      |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                   |
|   |   | Robert E. Conway                       |
|   |   | Chief Executive  Officer               |
|   |   |                                   |
|   |   |                                   |
|   |   |   /s/  R. Michael Carruthers |   |
|   |   |                                   |
|   |   | R. Michael  Carruthers                 |
|   |   | Chief Financial  Officer               |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Benjamin A. Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (i) the Annual Reportof Opsware Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31,2007 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) information contained in the Report fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Opsware Inc.

Date: April 13,2007
|        | By:    | /s/ Benjamin A. Horowitz |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Benjamin A. Horowitz     |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

This Certification which accompanies the Report is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Opsware Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the dateof the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing.

----
§ 160.201 General. This subpart contains requirements and procedures for submitting a notice of arrival (NOA), and a notice of hazardous condition. The sections in this subpart describe: ( a ) Applicability and exemptions from requirements in this subpart;
( b ) Required information in an NOA;
( c ) Required updates to an NOA;
( d ) Methods and times for submission of an NOA, and updates to an NOA;
( e ) How to obtain a waiver; and
( f ) Requirements for submission of the notice of hazardous condition.
Note to § 160.201 .
For notice-of-arrival requirements for the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf, see 33 CFR part 146.
[80 FR 5330, Jan. 30, 2015]
§ 20.310 Default by respondent. ( a ) The ALJ may find a respondent in default upon failure to file a timely answer to the complaint or, after motion, upon failure to appear at a conference or hearing without good cause shown.
( b ) Each motion for default must conform to the rules of form, service, and filing of this subpart. Each motion must include a proposed decision and proof of service under section 20.304(d). The respondent alleged to be in default shall file a reply to the motion 20 days or less after service of the motion.
( c ) Default by respondent constitutes, for purposes of the pending action only, an admission of all facts alleged in the complaint and a waiver of her or his right to a hearing on those facts.
( d ) Upon finding a respondent in default, the ALJ shall issue a decision against her or him.
( e ) For good cause shown, the ALJ may set aside a finding of default.
#### § 154.1135 Response plan development and evaluation criteria.

The following response times must be used in determining the on scene arrival time in Prince William Sound for the response resources required by § 154.1045:

| | Tier 1 (hrs.) | Tier 2 (hrs.) | tier 3 (hrs.) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Prince William Sound Area | 12 | 24 | 36 |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 484 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 484

 To direct the United States Sentencing Commission to provide penalty 
 enhancements for drug offenses committed in the presence of children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

Mr. Nethercutt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the United States Sentencing Commission to provide penalty 
 enhancements for drug offenses committed in the presence of children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Children Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. GUIDELINES.

    The United States Sentencing Commission shall amend or promulgate 
sentencing guidelines no later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act to provide that an offense under part D of the 
Controlled Substances Act which is committed in the presence of a child 
receives a penalty enhancement. The Sentencing Guidelines, as so 
amended or promulgated, shall reflect a minimum 2 offense levels 
greater than the offense level for the underlying offense or one year, 
whichever is greater, and in the case of a second such offense, not 
less than 4 offense levels greater or 2 years than the offense level, 
whichever is higher, for the underlying offense.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For the purposes of this Act, an offense is in the presence of a 
child if--
            (1) it takes place in the line of sight of an individual 
        who has not attained the age of 18 years; or
            (2) an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years 
        habitually resides in the place where the violation occurs.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 94 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 94

 Honoring the employees of the Department of Homeland Security on the 
                   4th anniversary of the Department.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2007

Mr. Voinovich (for himself, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Stevens, Mr. 
Warner, and Ms. Collins) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the employees of the Department of Homeland Security on the 
                   4th anniversary of the Department.

Whereas the United States must remain vigilant against all threats to the 
        homeland, including acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and other 
        emergencies;
Whereas the Department of Homeland Security marks its 4th anniversary on March 
        1, 2007;
Whereas the more than 208,000 employees of the Department work tirelessly to 
        carry out the complex mission of securing the Nation from terrorism and 
        natural hazards through protection, prevention, response, and recovery 
        as well as serving the public effectively by facilitating lawful trade, 
        travel, and immigration;
Whereas the Department's employees sacrifice time with their families to work 
        long hours to fulfill the Department's vital mission; and
Whereas the Nation is indebted to the Department's employees for their labors: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors the employees of the Department of 
Homeland Security for their substantial contributions to protecting the 
Nation on the 4th anniversary of the Department.
                                 <all>
```