alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4961

To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to clarify the intent of Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2000

Mr. WATT of North Carolina (for himself, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. WYNN, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr.

TOWNS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. FATTAH, Ms. LEE, Mr. SCOTT, Ms. BROWN

of Florida, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. CLAY,

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. DIXON, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr.

CONYERS, Ms. WATERS, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. THOMPSON of

Mississippi, Mr. BISHOP, Ms. CARSON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. FORD, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. KILPATRICK, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN,

Mr. HILLIARD, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. OWENS, Mr. RUSH, and Mr. JEFFERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to clarify the

intent of Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Rights Clari5 fication Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 4961 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the Department of Justice has consistently

4 enforced section 5 of the Voting Rights Act by inter5 posing objections to changes in qualifications, pre6 requisites, standards, practices, or procedures relat7 ing to voting where those changes were motivated by

8 any purpose or intent to discriminate on the basis

9 of race or color, not just the limited purpose or in10 tent to retrogress;

11 (2) certain aspects of recent decisions and opin12 ions of the Supreme Court have unduly narrowed

13 the standard of review applied to changes affecting

14 voting under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of

15 1965; and

16 (3) legislative action is necessary to restore the

17 prior consistent and longstanding executive branch

18 interpretation of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

19 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF PURPOSE TO DENY OR

20 ABRIDGE.

21 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is amend22 ed by inserting ‘‘As used in this subsection, ‘purpose . . .

23 of denying or abridging’ is not limited to the purpose or

24 intent to retrogress but can be any purpose or intent to
3

•HR 4961 IH

1 discriminate.’’ after ‘‘procedure:’’ and before ‘‘Provided,’’

2 in the first sentence.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

[OJP (OJJDP)--1280]


Meeting of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and 
Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Announcement of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice 
and Delinquency Prevention meeting.

DATES: A meeting of the advisory committee, chartered as the 
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 
will take place in the District of Columbia, beginning at 1 p.m. on 
Monday, June 26, 2000, and ending at 3 p.m., ET.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the U.S. Department of 
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Main Conference Room, 3rd Floor, 
810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Altman, Program Manager, Juvenile 
Justice Resource Center at (301) 519-5721. [This is not a toll-free 
number.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coordinating Council, established 
pursuant to section 3(2)A of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), will meet to carry out its advisory functions under 
Section 206 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 
1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5601 et seq.). This meeting will be open to 
the public. Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting should 
notify the Juvenile Justice Resource Center at the number listed above 
by 5 p.m., ET, on Friday, June 16, 2000. For security purposes, picture 
identification will be required.

    Dated: June 2, 2000.
John J. Wilson,
Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-14360 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
Date 11/4/09 Page of



### INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Summary Page

Chemical ID: P100009
§ 151.23 Inspection for compliance and enforcement. ( a ) While at a port or terminal under the jurisdiction of the United States, a ship is subject to inspection by the Coast Guard— ( 1 ) To determine that a valid IOPP Certificate is on board and that the condition of the ship and its equipment corresponds substantially with the particulars of the IOPP Certificate;
( 2 ) To determine that evidence of compliance with MARPOL 73/78, as required by § 151.21 is on board and that the condition of the ship and its equipment corresponds substantially with the particulars of this evidence of compliance;
( 3 ) To determine whether a ship has been operating in accordance with and has not discharged any oil or oily mixtures in violation of the provisions of MARPOL 73/78 or this subchapter;
( 4 ) To determine whether a ship has discharged oil or oily mixtures anywhere in violation of MARPOL 73/78, upon request from a party to MARPOL 73/78 for an investigation when the requesting party has furnished sufficient evidence to support a reasonable belief that a discharge has occurred.
( b ) A ship that does not comply with the requirements of parts 151, 155 and 157 of this chapter, or where the condition of the ship or its equipment does not substantially agree with the particulars of the IOPP Certificate or other required documentation, may be detained by order of the COTP or OCMI, at the port or terminal where the violation is discovered until, in the opinion of the detaining authority, the ship can proceed to sea without presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment. The detention order may authorize the ship to proceed to the nearest appropriate available shipyard rather than remaining at the place where the violation was discovered.
( c ) An inspection under this section may include an examination of the Oil Record Book, the oil content meter continuous records, and a general examination of the ship. A copy of any entry in the Oil Record Book may be made and the Master of the ship may be required to certify that the copy is a true copy of such entry.
[CGD 75-124a, 48 FR 45709, Oct. 6, 1983, as amended by CGD 88-002A, 55 FR 18582, May 2, 1990]
§ 203.13 Available assistance. Corps assistance provided under authority of Public Law 84-99 is intended to be supplemental to State and local efforts. The principal assistance programs and activities of the Corps are described in this section. ( a ) *Disaster preparedness.* Technical assistance for many types of disasters is available to State and local interests. Primary Corps efforts are focused on technical assistance for, and inspections of, flood control works, and related flood fight preparedness and training activities. Technical assistance for specialized studies, project development, and related activities, and requirements for long term assistance, are normally beyond the scope of disaster preparedness assistance, and are appropriately addressed by other Corps authorities and programs. Subpart B addresses disaster preparedness responsibilities and activities.
( b ) *Emergency operations.* Emergency operations, consisting of Flood Response (flood fight and rescue operations) and Post Flood Response assistance, may be provided to supplement State and local emergency operations efforts. Subpart C of this part addresses emergency operations assistance.
( c ) *Rehabilitation.* The Corps may rehabilitate flood control works damaged or destroyed by floods and coastal storms. The Corps Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (RIP) incorporates both disaster preparedness activities and Rehabilitation Assistance. The RIP consists of a process to inspect flood control works; a status determination, *i.e.,* an inspection-based determination of qualification for future potential Rehabilitation Assistance; and the provision of Rehabilitation Assistance to those projects with Active status that are damaged in a flood or coastal storm event. Subpart D addresses Rehabilitation Assistance and the RIP.
( d ) *Emergency water supplies due to contaminated water source.* The Corps may provide emergency supplies of clean water to any locality confronted with a source of contaminated water causing, or likely to cause, a substantial threat to the public health and welfare of the inhabitants of the locality. Subpart E addresses emergency water supply assistance.
( e ) *Drought assistance.* Corps assistance may be provided to drought-distressed areas (as declared by the Secretary of the Army or his delegated nominee) to construct wells and to transport water for human consumption. Subpart E addresses drought assistance.
( f ) *Advance Measures.* Advance Measures assistance may be provided to protect against imminent threats of predicted, but unusual, floods. Advance Measures projects must be justified from an engineering and economic standpoint, and must be capable of completion in a timely manner. Advance Measures assistance may be provided only to protect against loss of life and/or significant damages to improved property due to flooding. Subpart F of this part addresses Advance Measures assistance.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14471]



[[Page 36472]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-3921]


Mid-American Electro-Cords, Riblet Products Corporation, 
Middlebury, Indiana; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with Section 
250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended (19 USC 2331), an investigation was initiated on May 18, 2000, 
in response to a petition filed on May 15, 2000 on behalf of workers at 
Mid-American Electro-Cords, Riblet Products Corporation, Middlebury, 
Indiana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of June, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-14471 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001075445
<NAME>                        DIVERSIFIED PRODUCT INSPECTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         23,624
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  79,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,133
<PP&E>                                         145,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (48,070)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 521,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          460,809
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,112
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,292)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   521,506
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,597
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               783,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,441)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (310,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (310,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
§ 334.1200 Strait of Juan de Fuca, eastern end; off the westerly shore of Whidbey Island; naval restricted areas. ( a ) *Area No. 1.* Bounded by a line commencing at latitude 48°20′57′′ N., longitude 122°40′39′′ W.; thence to latitude 48°20′40′′ N., longitude 122°42′59′′ W.; thence to latitude 48°21′19′′ N., longitude 122°43′02′′ W.; thence to latitude 48°21′13′′ N., longitude 122°40′26′′ W.; and thence along the shore line to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area No. 2.* Bounded by a line commencing at latitude 48°21′53′′ N., longitude 122°40′00′′ W.; thence to latitude 48°23′12′′ N., longitude 122°41′17′′ W.; thence to latitude 48°23′29′′ N., longitude 122°40′22′′ W.; thence to latitude 48°22′21′′ N., longitude 122°39′50′′ W.; and thence along the shore line to the point of beginning.
( c ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Persons and vessels shall not enter these areas except at their own risk.
( 2 ) All persons and vessels entering these areas shall be obliged to comply with orders received from naval sources pertaining to their movements while in the areas.
( 3 ) The regulations in this paragraph shall be enforced by the Commander, Naval Base, Seattle, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[26 FR 11203, Nov. 28, 1961. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 334.1200, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
§ 334.210 Chesapeake Bay, in vicinity of Tangier Island; naval guided missiles test operations area. ( a ) *The danger zone* — ( 1 ) *Prohibited area.* A circle 1,000 yards in radius with its center at latitude 37°47′54′′, longitude 76°03′48′′.
( 2 ) *Restricted area.* A circle three nautical miles in radius with its center at latitude 37°47′54′′, longitude 76°03′48′′, excluding the prohibited area.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Persons, vessels or other craft shall not enter or remain in the prohibited area at any time unless authorized to do so by the enforcing agency.
( 2 ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b)(6) of this section, persons, vessels or other craft shall not enter or remain in the restricted area when firing is or will soon be in progress unless authorized to do so by the enforcing agency.
( 3 ) Advance notice will be given of the date on which the first firing is to be conducted and such notice will be published in “Notice to Mariners.” Thereafter, the danger zone will be in use intermittently throughout the year and no further notice is contemplated that firing is continuing.
( 4 ) Warning that firing is or will soon be in progress will be indicated by a red flag displayed from one of six dolphin platforms on the perimeter of the prohibited area, and by patrol vessels within the danger zone or by aircraft employing the method of warning known as “buzzing” which consists of low flight by the airplane and repeated opening and closing of the throttle. Surface or air search of the entire area will be made prior to the commencement of firing on each scheduled day. During periods of firing a patrol vessel will remain in the approaches to the restricted area and maintain continuous contact with the firing planes to warn when the area is not clear.
( 5 ) Upon observing the warning flag or upon receiving a warning by any of the patrol vessels or aircraft, persons, vessels or other craft shall immediately vacate the restricted area and remain outside the area until the conclusion of firing for the day.
( 6 ) This section shall not deny traverse of portions of the restricted area by commercial craft proceeding in established steamer lanes, but when firing is or will soon be in progress all such craft shall proceed on their normal course through the area with all practicable speed.
( 7 ) All projectiles, bombs and rockets will be fired to land within the prohibited area, and on or in the immediate vicinity of a target in the restricted area located adjacent to the west side of Tangier Island. The Department of the Navy will not be responsible for damages by such projectiles, bombs, or rockets to nets, traps, buoys, pots, fishpounds, stakes, or other equipment which may be located within the restricted area.
( 8 ) The regulations of this section shall be enforced by the Commander, Naval Air Bases, Fifth Naval District, Norfolk, Virginia, and such agencies as he may designate.
[13 FR 6918, Nov. 24, 1948, as amended at 22 FR 3706, May 25, 1957; 24 FR 3760, May 6, 1959. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17552, Apr. 10, 1997]
§ 334.580 Atlantic Ocean near Port Everglades, Fla. ( a ) *The area.* Beginning at a point located at latitude 26°05′30′′ N.—longitude 80°03′30′′ W.; proceed west to latitude 26°05′30′′ N.—longitude 80°06′30′′ W.; Thence, southerly to latitude 26°03′00′′ N.—longitude 80°06′42′′ W.; Thence, east to latitude 26°03′00′′ N.—longitude 80°05′44′′ W.; Thence, south to latitude 26°01′36′′ N.—longitude 80°05′44′′ W.; Thence, east to latitude 26°01′36′′ N.—longitude 80°03′30′′ W.; Thence, north to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Anchoring, trawling, dredging, or attaching any object to the submerged sea bottom shall be prohibited in the above described area.
( 2 ) The regulations of this section shall be enforced by the Facility Director, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Detachment Dania, Florida, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[51 FR 1370, Jan. 13, 1986, as amended at 70 FR 67371, Nov. 7, 2005]
§ 26.04 Use of the designated frequency. ( a ) No person may use the frequency designated by the Federal Communications Commission under section 8 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 1207(a), to transmit any information other than information necessary for the safe navigation of vessels or necessary tests.
( b ) Each person who is required to maintain a listening watch under section 5 of the Act shall, when necessary, transmit and confirm, on the designated frequency, the intentions of his vessel and any other information necessary for the safe navigation of vessels.
( c ) Nothing in these regulations may be construed as prohibiting the use of the designated frequency to communicate with shore stations to obtain or furnish information necessary for the safe navigation of vessels.
( d ) On the navigable waters of the United States, channel 13 (156.65 MHz) is the designated frequency required to be monitored in accordance with § 26.05(a) except that in the area prescribed in § 26.03(e), channel 67 (156.375 MHz) is the designated frequency.
( e ) On those navigable waters of the United States within a VTS area, the designated VTS frequency is an additional designated frequency required to be monitored in accordance with § 26.05.
(85 Stat. 164; 33 U.S.C. 1201-1208; 49 CFR 1.46(n)(2))
[CGD 71-114R, 37 FR 12720, June 28, 1982, as amended by CGD 83-036, 48 FR 30107, June 30, 1983; CGD 91-046, 57 FR 14486, Apr. 21, 1992; 57 FR 21741, May 22, 1992; CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36323, July 15, 1994; CGD 95-033, 60 FR 28329, May 31, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unity Wireless Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Ilan Kenig, Chief Executive Officer, and Dallas Pretty, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15() of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ilan Kenig

By: Ilan Kenig, President, Chief Executive Officer
March 23, 2005





/s/ Dallas Pretty

By: Dallas Pretty, Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 373 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 373

  Encouraging all employers to target veterans for recruitment and to 
          provide preference in hiring to qualified veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 2007

   Mr. Smith (for himself, Mr. Akaka, and Mr. Coleman) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Encouraging all employers to target veterans for recruitment and to 
          provide preference in hiring to qualified veterans.

Whereas the people of the United States have sincere appreciation and respect 
        for the individuals who serve in the Armed Forces;
Whereas in order to recognize their sacrifices, including time out from their 
        civilian careers while serving in the Armed Forces, Congress enacted the 
        Veterans' Preference Act of 1944 to restore veterans to a more favorable 
        competitive position for Federal Government employment;
Whereas, although veterans acquire skills and qualities during their military 
        service that make them ideal candidates for employment, some veterans 
        need assistance in readjusting to civilian life, including some young 
        veterans who experience high unemployment rates;
Whereas it is acknowledged that the dignity, pride, and satisfaction of a 
        civilian job are essential to the smooth and full reintegration into 
        civilian life of those who have answered our Nation's call to arms; and
Whereas all citizens and all employers benefit from the service of members of 
        the Armed Forces and thus bear some responsibility to assist in the 
        reintegration of former servicemembers into civilian life: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) urges all employers, private sector as well as State, 
        county, and local government, to target veterans for 
        recruitment and to afford qualified veterans hiring preference 
        similar to the benefits provided by chapter 33 of title 5, 
        United States Code, to preference eligibles, as defined in 
        section 2108 of such title.
                                 <all>
```