alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64160-64161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25589]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0586, FRL-9918-57-Region-9]

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; 
California; Regional Haze Progress Report; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is extending the 
public comment period for a proposed rule titled ``Approval and 
Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California; Regional Haze 
Progress Report,'' which was published in the Federal Register on 
September 29, 2014. The new deadline of November 28, 2014, will provide 
an additional 30 days for a total of 60 days to comment on our 
proposal.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule published on September 29, 2014 
(79 FR 58302) must be received on or before November 28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-
R09-OAR-2014-0586, by one of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: webb.thomas@epa.gov.
     Fax: 415-947-3579 (Attention: Thomas Webb).
     Mail, Hand Delivery, or Courier: Thomas Webb, EPA Region 
9, Air Division (AIR-2), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 
94105. Hand and courier deliveries are only accepted Monday through 
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

[[Page 64161]]

Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Webb, U.S. EPA, Region 9, 
Planning Office, Air Division, AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, CA 94105. Thomas Webb may be reached at telephone number 
(415) 947-4139 and via electronic mail at webb.thomas@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is extending the public comment period 
for the proposed rule, ``Approval and Promulgation of State 
Implementation Plans; California; Regional Haze Progress Report,'' by 
30 days. With this extension, the public comment period will end on 
November 28, 2014, rather than October 29, 2014. The proposal is to 
approve the California Regional Haze Progress Report in which the State 
has determined that its existing Regional Haze State Implementation 
Plan is adequate to meet the visibility goals for 2018, and requires no 
substantive revision at this time.

    Dated: October 20, 2014.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2014-25589 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C. AND

THOMAS J. KARL,

Petitioners

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

DELAWARE COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 95 MM 2019

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6 th day of September , 2019

, the Petitioners’ Application for Leave

to File Original Process is GRANTED . The Petitioners’ Emergency King’s Bench Petition

for a Stay and Writ of Prohibition is DENIED

.
#### Gover v. Williams.

(Decided November 24, 1915.)

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Findings of Chancellor — Conclusiveness.—■ Where the evidence conflicts and the mind is left in doubt as to the truth, so that the Court of Appeals cannot determine with reasonable certainty that the chancellor erred, his findings will not b’e disturbed.

EMMET PURYEAR, J. S. OWSLEY and ROBERT HARDING for appellant.

P. M. M'ROBERTS for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Plaintiff, B. G. Gover, rented from the defendant, Mrs. Bettie Williams, her farm, consisting of about 235 acres, located in Lincoln county, for the years 1910,1911 and 1912. By an agreed judgment entered in the Lincoln Circuit Court, the rental contract was terminated and defendant given possession of her farm on December 31, 1911. Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to recover the sum of $977.67, subject to a credit of $165.93. His petition is in eight paragraphs and each paragraph contains a number of items. Defendant filed an answer and counter-claim containing twenty-one para*57graphs, denying the allegations of the petition, and asking judgment on divers claims, aggregating $2,197.53, subject to a credit of $601.35, leaving due her an alleged balance of $1,596.18. The case was referred to the Master Commissioner to hear proof and settle the accounts between the parties. The commissioner made a report, to which plaintiff filed numerous exceptions. On the hearing by the chancellor, the exceptions were overruled and the report confirmed. Judgment was then entered in conformity with the report in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

We have carefully considered the evidence. In every instance it is conflicting. With but few exceptions, plaintiff and defendant are the only witnesses, and he testifies one way while' the defendant testifies the other. The case is one, therefore, where the commissioner and chancellor believed one witness rather than another. In cases where the evidence is conflicting and upon consideration of the whole case the mind is left, in doubt, and this court cannot determine with reasonable certainty, that the chancellor has erred, it is our rule not to disturb his finding. Rawlings v. Fish, 151 Ky., 764, 152 S. W., 941; Wilson v. Ward, 151 Ky., 233, 151 S. W., 353; City of West Covington v. Dods, 152 Ky., 617, 153. S. W., 964. Clearly the case is one calling for the application of the above rule.

Judgment affirmed.
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA,

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ AND

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC.,

REINIER CORTES, AND

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiffs, Delio Batista, Carlos Lopez, Mariana Lopez, and Rafaela Valiente, appeal to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Final Judgment [ECF No. 106] 

and all other Orders entered in this case.

Dated this 13th day of September 2023.

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 122 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2023 Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. WI L F R E DO T OR R E S - VA L E NZ UE L A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50328 D . C . N o. 3: 11 -c r- 01 02 5-JL S -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a ni s L . S a m m a rt i no, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W ilf r e d o T o rr e s - V a le n z u e laap p e a ls th e s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is gu i l ty pl eat o b ei ng a deport ed al i en foun d i n the U ni t ed S t at es i n v i ol at i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1 32 6. T orre s- V al enzuel a c on t ends thathi s 30-m on th sent ence w as 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSs ubs t a nt i ve l yunr e a s onabl e . I n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s a nd the s e nt e nc i ng f

a c t or s s e tf

orth i n 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) , the s e nt e nc e a tthe l ow e nd of th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e w a s r e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 552 U . S . 38, 51, 12 8 S . C t . 58 6, 16 9 L . E d. 2d 44 5 (20 07 ). T o rr e s - V a le n z u e la ’s c o n te n tio n th a t N i j ha w an v. H

older , 557 U . S . 29, 129 S . C t . 2294, 174 L . E d. 2d 22 ( 2009) , ove rrul e d A lm enda rez–T orres v . U

ni ted States , 523 U . S . 224, 118 S . C t . 1219, 140 L . E d. 2d 350 ( 1998) , i s f or e c l os e d by U ni ted States v. V

aldo vi no s–Mendez , 64 1 F . 3d 10 31 , 10 35 –3 6 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). A FFI R M ED .
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 148.307 Who may consult with the Commandant (CG-5P) and MARAD on developing the proposed conditions of a license?

Federal agencies, the Adjacent Coastal States, and the owner of the deepwater port may consult with the Commandant (CG-5P) and MARAD on the conditions of the license being developed under 33 U.S.C. 1503(e).

[USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Alan R. Abrams, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 17, 2005 /s/ Alan R. Abrams   Alan R. Abrams Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Home","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UzYjxwH35H\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/\">Home<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/embed\/#?secret=UzYjxwH35H\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Home” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"UzYjxwH35H\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report
or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ WALTER C. JOHNSEN
         ------------------------------
                Walter C. Johnsen
                 President and
             Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 3, 2006




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3.85-15 Sector Anchorage: Western Alaska Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zones; Marine Safety Unit Valdez: Prince William Sound Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zones. Sector Anchorage's office is located in Anchorage, AK. A subordinate unit, Marine Safety Unit (MSU) Valdez, is located in Valdez, AK. ( a ) Sector Anchorage's Western Alaska Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zones start near the Canadian border on the EEZ at latitude 60°18′24′′ N, longitude 141°00′00′′ W, proceeding southwest to latitude 60°01′18′′ N, longitude 142°00′00′′ W; thence south to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 56°14′50′′ N, longitude 142°00′00′′ W; thence southwest along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 51°22′15′′ N, longitude 167°38′28′′ E; thence northeast along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 65°30′00′′ N, longitude 168°58′37′′ W; thence north along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 72°46′29′′ N, longitude 168°58′37′′ W; thence northeast along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 74°42′35′′ N, longitude 156°28′30′′ W; thence southeast along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 72°56′49′′ N, longitude 137°34′08′′ W; thence south along the outermost extent of the EEZ to the coast near the Canadian border at latitude 69°38′48.88′′ N, longitude 140°59′52.7′′ W; thence south along the United States-Canadian boundary to the point of origin; and in addition, all the area described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The boundaries of MSU Valdez's Prince William Sound Marine Inspection and Captain of the Port Zones start at Cape Puget at latitude 59°56′04′′ N, longitude 148°26′00′′ W, proceeding north to latitude 61°30′00′′ N, longitude 148°26′00′′ W; thence east to the United States-Canadian boundary at latitude 61°30′00′′ N, longitude 141°00′00′′ W; thence south along the United States-Canadian boundary to latitude 60°18′24′′ N, longitude 141°00′00′′ W; thence southwest to the sea at latitude 60°01′18′′ N, longitude 142°00′00′′ W; thence south to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 56°14′50′′ N, longitude 142°00′00′′ W; thence along the outermost boundary of the EEZ to latitude 54°49′26′′ N, longitude 148°26′00′′ W; thence north to the point of origin.
[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36326, July 2, 2007, as amended by USCG-2008-0073, 73 FR 15080, Mar. 21, 2008]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 17, 2018

N o. 04

- 17

- 00795

- CR

Jerrod Maurice YOUNG

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8369W

Honorable Steven C. Hilbig , Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED on January 17, 2018

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of January, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
One Solution Group LLC

Business Name Loan Type Date Amount Trans Type Lender Acct #

One Solution Group LLC PPP Loan 6/1/2020 $20,833 EFT Celtic Bank 0778

Funded Loans 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-24 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
## SERVE D AUGUS T 9 , 201 1 •VPARTMENTO F 

### TRANSPORTATIO N -•OCKE TOPERATION S ZO! l M; G

### i O A 'i : 3 2

u s DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F 

## SK YKING , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . CP10NM001 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S rAA-2()IO-l2] 6 

### ORDE R O F DISMISSA L O n Decembe r

10 , 2010 , th e Federa l AyiaLioi i Administratio n ("Complainant" ) file daComplaint . Responden t Sk y King , Inc . ("Respondent" ) ha do n Novembe r 30 , 201 0 file daReques t

fo r Hearing . O n Augus t

2,20 1 settlemen t

o f th e matter . , Responden t withdre w it s Reqnes t

fo r Hearing , citin g I4C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states ; "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y ma y withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e la w judge . I f a n agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t fo r ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpar t wit hprejudice. "

, WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawalo f Reques t fo r Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i

t i s ORDERE D a s follows :2 

### 1 . Respondent' s Withdrawal ofRcques l fo r Hearin g is hereb y granted ; and 2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwi( hprejudice . S O ORDERED .

RichardC . Goodwi n Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t N o CP10NM001 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2WIOOO '

ON ECOP Y Greg g P . Lukenbil , Agen t fo r Servic e ATTN : Stephe nA . Badger , X- T Fligh t Operation s an dDirecto r

o f Safet y an dSecurit y Sk y King , Inc . 360 0 Powe r

In nRoad , Suit e H Sacramento , C A 9582 6 TEL : 916-454-240 0 FAX : 916-737-896 0 Lis aJ . Toscano , Comp/ainan t ' s Conti.se/ Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 0 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEI2-32 0 Wasjiington , D C 2059 0 'TEL'^~202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t 202-366-753 6 Fa x

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i nperso no r b y expeditedcourier, use lli

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdininislralion , 80

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washingion , D C 20591 : Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk . AGC-430 .
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Litigation Risk ADR

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Litigation Risk ADR Litigation Risk ADRADR2022-02-17T18:40:16-05:00
			
			Litigation Risk ADRLitigation risk ADR may be appropriate in situations where the record has been sufficiently developed to allow the GAO attorney to assess the validity of each side’s arguments and provide feedback.  In litigation risk ADR, the GAO attorney will discuss the likely analysis of the case and will provide his or her assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s position.  It is expected that, with a better understanding of the GAO attorney’s views of each side’s arguments, the parties will be in a better position to reach a negotiated settlement, or to take other action (withdrawal of the protest or corrective action) that will resolve the protest without continuing to a final published decision. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508