alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM QUINONES and LONDON HEIGHTS 

BRITISH PUB, LLC n/k/a HEIGHTS 

SPORTS BAR & BISTRO, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

MICHAEL A. BOZEL; LYSA M. BOZEL; OLD 

SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PROPERTIES, LLC; and 

NIGHTINGALE's INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 2D22-2158 

April 5, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Caroline Tesche 

Arkin, Judge.

Janelle A. Weber of Manta Law, Tampa; and Michael D. LaBarbera of 

LaBarbera and Campbell, Tampa, for Appellants.

Kevin F. Sanderson of Kevin F. Sanderson, Chartered, Sarasota, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR 

JUDGE, Concur.
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.840 What records must be kept? ( a ) The licensee must keep copies at the deepwater port of the reports, records, test results, and operating data required by this part. In the case of unmanned deepwater ports, these copies must be kept at the operator's principal office rather than on the deepwater port.
( b ) The copies must be readily available to Coast Guard inspectors.
( c ) Except for personnel records under § 150.845 of this part, the copies must be kept for 3 years.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39183, July 1, 2013]
(77 South. 1004)

#### SELLORS v. STATE.

(6 Div. 363.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H. P. Heflin, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Matthew J. Espe, Chief Executive Officer of
IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 8, 2005                                  
|                                                    
|/s/ MATTHEW J. ESPE                                 
|Matthew J. Espe Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 3.3




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF


CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


OF


VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.





Vertical Computer Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law,





DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:





FIRST:  That pursuant to the recommendation of the Board of Directors of Vertical Computer Systems, Inc., the following resolution amending the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation has been adopted by the vote of stockholders of said corporation holding a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon. The resolution setting forth the amendment is as follows:





RESOLVED, that Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:





"The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is: 1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.0000l per share ("Common  Stock"'); 1,000,000 shares of Series "A" Preferred Stock having a par value of $.001 per share;  375,000 shares of Series "B" Preferred Stock having a par value of$.00 I per share; 375,000 shares of Series "C" Preferred Stock having a par value of $.00l per share and 300,000 shares of Series "I)" Preferred Stock having a par value of $.001 per share (collectively "Preferred Stock"). Upon the filing of this Certificate of Amendment, all issued and outstanding Common Stock as of this Amendment's filing date, shall be subject to a forward split of twenty for one."





The Board of Directors is authorized subject to limitations prescribed by law and the provisions of this Article Fourth, to provide by resolution or resolutions for the issuance of the shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series, and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable laws of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares included in any such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of any such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof





SECOND: That these resolutions have been adopted by written consent of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Vertical Computer Systems, Inc., has caused this certificate to be signed by its President, this 7th day of February, 2000.





VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.By:
/s/ Richard WadeRichard Wade, President
Colville National Forest

Sullivan Creek Dam Negotiation

October 2008-December 2009

Location: Newport, Washington

Background

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

has required the Pend Oreille PUD to surrender its

FERC license at the Sullivan Dam facilities because

power is no longer being generated there. The

Sullivan Dam facilities are located on National Forest

System lands at Sullivan Lake and along Sullivan

Creek, a tributary of the Pend Oreille River, near the

town of Metaline Falls, Washington. It is owned and

operated by the Pend Oreille PUD, which uses the

Sullivan Lake and Mill Pond dams to store water for

downstream power generation. Once the license is

abandoned, the USDA Forest Service becomes the

federal managing agency and any remaining facilities

are required by federal law to obtain a Special Use

Authorization that meets current environmental

standards.

A negotiation team was formed for the license

surrender process which brought together

representatives from community, local, state, federal,

and tribal stakeholder interests. The negotiation team

was facilitated by the U.S. Institute for

Environmental Conflict Resolution.

Highlights/Innovation

 The negotiation effort brought together members

of the USDA Forest Service, US Fish & Wildlife

Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, National Park

Service, WA Department of Ecology, WA

Department of Fish & Wildlife, American

Whitewater, The Lands Council, Selkirk

Conservation Alliance, Kalispel Tribe and several

members of the public. The team worked together

over a year and a half to jointly develop a

settlement agreement for the FERC license

surrender that considers all of the stakeholder

interests and provides benefits to the community

and to the river system.

photo credit: USDA Forest Service

Results and Accomplishments

 On Monday, March 29, 2010, two interrelated

settlement agreements that call for the continued

operation of Boundary Dam on the Pend Oreille

River, enhanced operation of Sullivan Dam on

the natural Sullivan Lake, and the removal of

Mill Pond Dam on Sullivan Creek were signed.

 In addition to addressing dam operations, these

agreements provide for the protection and

enhancement of fish and wildlife habitat, native

species protection, improved public recreation

facilities and programs, and commit to

maintaining the regional quality of life enjoyed

by residents and visitors alike.

U.S. Institute Project Lead

Cherie Shanteau-Wheeler, Esq.

Senior Mediator/Senior Program Manager

Defense, Energy, Transportation and Training Team

Phone: 520-901-8546 Fax: 520-901-8547

Email: shanteau@ecr.gov Website: www.ecr.gov

Gail Brooks

Program Associate

Defense, Energy, Transportation and Training Team

Phone: 520-901-8532; Fax: 520-901-8533

Email: brooks@ecr.gov Website: www.ecr.gov
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35993-35994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Peninsula Terminal Company; (Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2000-7269)

    The Peninsula Terminal Company seeks a permanent waiver of 
compliance from the requirements of the Safety Glazing Standards, 49 
CFR Part 223, which requires certified glazing in all locomotive 
windows, except those locomotives used in yard service, for one 
locomotive. The railroad indicates that the locomotive, number LPN 130, 
is an Electro Motive Division SW-15 switch engine equipped with 
laminated glazing in all windows. The locomotive is utilized in the 
Portland, Oregon, area

[[Page 35994]]

providing switching service between North Force Avenue on the east to 
Suttle Road on the west, a distance of 1 mile, and \1/4\ mile south to 
an interchange point with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union 
Pacific Railroads.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number 2000-
7269) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management 
Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20590. Communications received within 30 days of the date of this 
notice will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above 
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for 
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's web 
site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 25, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-14064 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
§ 181.15 Contents of labels. ( a ) Each label required by § 181.7 must contain: ( 1 ) The name and address of the manufacturer or private label merchandiser who certifies that the boat or item of associated equipment complies with the standards prescribed in Part 183 of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the words: ( i ) “This (insert ‘Boat’ or ‘Equipment’) Complies With U.S. Coast Guard Safety Standards In Effect On (insert date of certification as prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section)”; or
( ii ) If the item being certified is a boat, the label may show the words, “This Boat Complies With U.S. Coast Guard Safety Standards In Effect On The Date of Certification.”
( b ) Date of certification must be no earlier than the date on which construction or assembly began and no later than the date on which the boat or item of associated equipment leaves the place of manufacture or assembly or import for the purposes of sale.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the manufacturer may, in addition to the information required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, display on the certification label any or all of the following information: ( 1 ) Model name or designation.
( 2 ) Hull identification number (if a boat) or serial number (if an item of associated equipment).
( 3 ) Model year.
( e ) Display of the hull identification number on the certification label does not satisfy the display requirements of § 181.29.
( f ) Each boat which displays a maximum horsepower capacity determined in accordance with § 183.53(b) must, in addition to the information required by paragraphs (a), (b) and (d) of this section, display on the certification label, the following statement in letters no less than one-quarter of an inch in height:
THIS BOAT IS INTENDED FOR RACING AND OTHER HIGH PERFORMANCE ACTIVITIES. THE SKILL REQUIRED MAY EXCEED THE ABILITIES OF SOME OPERATORS. [CGD 72-60, 37 FR 15779, Aug. 4, 1972, as amended by CGD 83-012, 49 FR 39327, Oct. 5, 1984; CGD 85-002, 51 FR 37573, Oct. 23, 1986; USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999]
March 3, 2011 

Docket Section 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-2003-14694, Intra-Alaska Bush Service Mail Rates 

To Whom It May Concern: 

The Consolidated Carriers have no objection to granting an extension of time to respond 

to the Reply of the Consolidated Carriers filed February 28, 2011. The proposal of 

Penair is the most significant change in mail rate structure since 2003. The proposal also 

raises the policy issue of providing economic incentive to downgrade large aircraft 

operations from Part 121. That incentive is contrary to the intent of the Rural Service 

Improvement Act. 

We must be careful to understand the impact of reduced mail pay on carriers who do not 

have any ability to alter their operations. When the D.O.T. eliminated the Part 121 STOL 

rate because it became higher than the Part 135 Wheel rate, ERA could not operate its 

Bethel bush service more efficiently and subsequently eliminated all bush service at that 

hub. 

Respectfully submitted 

Hank Myers 

MTC ● P.O. Box 7142 Bellevue, WA 98008-1142 ● (425) 830-4265 ● hank@mtcworld.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1997
<CASH>                                          35,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (610)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,673
<PP&E>                                          16,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6144)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                        2527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,300
<SALES>                                         27,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,699
<CGS>                                           20,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (120)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    519
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1326-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Maine (FEMA-1326-DR), dated April 28, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 24, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective April 26, 2000. 

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537,                               ( print page 36139)                            Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)                     

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 00-14299 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2000 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2000 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.509 How must emergency equipment be tested and inspected?

All lifesaving, firefighting, and other emergency equipment at a deepwater port must be tested and inspected under this subpart.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:22-CV-61553-DIMITROULEAS/HUNT

CRUZ VALDIVIESO FIGUERA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALL VIP CARE INC. AND 

LIZ VELAZQUEZ MCKINNON,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Court’s careful consideration of Defendants’

Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 54]. The Court is otherwise fully advised in the 

premises.

Per the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the Motion for Summary 

Judgment and the opposition thereto “shall each be accompanied by a separate and 

contemporaneously filed and served Statement of Material Facts.” L.R. 56.1(a). “All Statements 

of Material Facts (whether filed by the movant or the opponent) shall be filed and served as 

separate documents and not as exhibits or attachments.” L.R. 56.1(b)(1) (emphasis added).

S.D. Fla. L.R. 56.1 (emphasis added). Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment 

[DE 54] must be stricken because Defendants again failed to comply with the Local Rules, 

despite the Court having struck Defendants’ previously filed motion for Defendants’ failure to do 

so. See [DE 53].

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion for 

Amended Summary Judgment [DE 54] is hereby STRICKEN. Defendants’ counsel are 

instructed to carefully study and follow the requirements of Local Rule 56.1 before 

making any future filings.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 14th day of July, 2023.

Copies to: 

Counsel of record 

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT EARL REEVES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 1322

[ August 10, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562021CF00 1 065AXXXXX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs , Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tall ahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley

, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Kevin KyserKevin Kyser,Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.