alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 154.2200 Applicable transfer facility design and installation requirements. A tank barge cleaning facility's (TBCF's) vapor control system (VCS) must meet the following design and installation requirements of this subpart for a transfer facility's VCS: ( a ) 33 CFR 154.2100(b), (c), (f), (g), (i), (j), and (k): general design and installation requirements;
( b ) 33 CFR 154.2102: facility requirements for vessel liquid overfill protection, if a TBCF receives vapor from a tank barge that is required by 46 CFR 39.6001(f)(3) to be equipped with a liquid overfill protection arrangement and meet 46 CFR 39.2009;
( c ) 33 CFR 154.2106: detonation arrester installation;
( d ) 33 CFR 154.2107: inerting, enriching, and diluting systems;
( e ) 33 CFR 154.2108: vapor-moving devices;
( f ) 33 CFR 154.2109: vapor recovery and vapor destruction units;
( g ) 33 CFR 154.2111: VCS connected to a facility's main VCS;
( h ) 33 CFR 154.2112: special requirements for vapors with the potential to polymerize or freeze; and
( i ) 33 CFR 154.2113: special requirements for alkylene oxides.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 490 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 490

  To require the Secretary of Energy to purchase additional petroleum 
             products for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

    Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Bonilla, and Mr. Combest) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Energy to purchase additional petroleum 
             products for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PURCHASE OF OIL.

    The Secretary of Energy shall, before October 1, 1999, purchase for 
storage in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve an additional $300,000,000 
of petroleum products.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the nine months ended September 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       147
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         224,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        208,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,174
<OTHER-SE>                                         229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,415
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,775
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.313 Inspection for compliance and enforcement. ( a ) Cruise vessels operating within the applicable waters of Alaska are subject to inspection by the Coast Guard to ensure compliance with this subpart.
( b ) An inspection under this section shall include an examination of the Sewage and Graywater Discharge Record Book required under § 159.315 of this subpart, environmental compliance records, and a general examination of the vessel. A copy of any entry in the Sewage and Graywater Discharge Record Book may be made and the Master of the vessel may be required to certify that the copy is a true copy of the original entry.
( c ) A vessel not in compliance with this subpart may be subject to the penalties set out in § 159.321, denied entry into the applicable waters of Alaska, detained, or restricted in its operations by order of the COTP.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.06 – Partnering","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AQMIG1B4Ug\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch06\/\">Ch.06 – Partnering<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch06\/embed\/#?secret=AQMIG1B4Ug\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.06 – Partnering” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"AQMIG1B4Ug\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 31(d)2**

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Ronnie R. Labrato, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 4, 2006

/s/Ronnie R. Labrato

Ronnie R. Labrato

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7430

RONNIE MILLER, a/k/a Brian Coles,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BALTIMORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:07-cv-02329)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Miller appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Miller’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Baltimore County

Dept of Corr, No. 1:07-cv-02329 (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
22-mj-03424-McAliley

Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 1 of 7
FaceTime

August 22, 2022

22-mj-03424-McAliley

Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 6 of 7
22nd

Case 1:22-mj-03424-CMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 7 of 7
Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM   Document 78   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2024   Page 1 of 5

Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM   Document 78   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2024   Page 2 of 5

Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM   Document 78   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2024   Page 3 of 5

Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM   Document 78   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2024   Page 4 of 5

Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM   Document 78   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2024   Page 5 of 5
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 2 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed: Number on Feed, Placements, Marketings, and

Other Disappearance, 1,000+ Capacity Feedlots,

United States, March 1, 1997-99

Nume6999 2 Hp Hp HpPpcint7(t580(P)5-2r)7(cint7ı ̋ 1 rgı ̋/G

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 4 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 5 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 6 NASS, USDA
?

i

KNOW YOURRights! If you live in a nursing home or assisted living, you have:

The right to information, in a language you understand.

The right to participate in all 

aspects of your care.

The right to privacy and 

confidentiality.

The right to make 

independent 

choices 

based on your 

needs and 

preferences.

The right to 

participate in social, 

religious, and 

community 

activities.

THE RIGHT TO...

safe and appropriate transfer and discharge, including 

the right to appeal decisions.

complain without fear of repercussions.

be free from discrimination, abuse, neglect, 

and restraints.

The right to organize 

and participate in resident 

groups or councils.

The right to information 

about living in the 

community.

The right to adequate medical care 

and treatment.

The right to 

visits 

from friends, 

family, 

providers and 

other people of 

your choosing.

Long-Term Care Ombudsman programs act as advocates for residents of nursing homes; board & care, and assisted 

living facilities; and similar residential care facilities.

Contact your local program:
From: Kristin Leake To: Finamore, Robert (OST) Subject: AeroUnion: Application for MEX-DFW (2012-0134) Polling Results Date: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 3:52:11 PM

I just finished the polling for AeroUnion’s exemption application dated Aug 8 in Docket DOT-OST2012-0134. There were no objections.

Kristin K. Leake Law Offices of Pierre Murphy 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 776-3980 Facsimile: (202) 776-3975 Email: kkleake@lopmurphy.com
#### § 26.05 Use of radiotelephone.

Section 5 of the Act states that the radiotelephone required by this Act is for the exclusive use of the master or person in charge of the vessel, or the person designated by the master or person in charge to pilot or direct the movement of the vessel, who shall maintain a listening watch on the designated frequency. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as precluding the use of portable radiotelephone equipment to satisfy the requirements of this act.

[CGD 93-072, 59 FR 39963, Aug. 5, 1994]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7021
ROBERT CALVIN CRAIG, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MACK JARVIS; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-97-372-5-BR) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Craig v. Jarvis , No. CA-97-372-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 17, 1997). We deny the motions for i njunctive relief and to strike Fed. R. App. P. 45 notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

1

 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31289

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM STEPTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-389-G)

December 31, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Stepter pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess cocaine

hydrochloride with intent to distribute,1and was sentenced to 60 months
2

 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

3Childs v. Collins, 995 F.2d 67 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 613 (1993).

2

imprisonment, followed by a four-year term of supervised release, and a $10,000

fine. Stepter did not directly appeal but filed a motion to vacate, correct, or set

aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court, acting upon a

magistrate judge’s recommendation, denied the motion; Stepter timely appealed.

Stepter’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California2and has moved to withdraw. Stepter has been notified of his right to

respond and has filed a supplemental brief in support of his appeal. Accordingly,

we review the issues raised in brief and the record as a whole to determine whether

there are any nonfrivolous issue(s) on appeal.

The first issue raised is whether Stepter’s trial counsel rendered ineffective

assistance by failing to pursue a direct appeal. The district court found that Stepter

was advised by counsel of his right to appeal, but that Stepter never informed

anyone that he wished to file an appeal. This finding is well supported by the

record. There is no merit whatever in Stepter’s claim that trial counsel’s ineffective

assistance cost him his right to appeal.3

Stepter also contends that the sentencing court failed to advise him of his

right to appeal, did not allow him to speak at sentencing, and sentenced him to a
4United States v. Garcia-Flores, 906 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1990).

5UnitedStates v. Segler, 37 F.3d 1131 (5thCir. 1994); United States v.Weintraub, 871

F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1989).

6See Loc.R. 42.2.

3

$10,000 fine without determining whether he had the means to pay. The district

court’s factual finding that Stepter was advised of his right to appeal by trial

counsel defeats the first assertion,4and Stepter’s allocution and excessive fine

claims are not initially cognizable in a section 2255 proceeding.5

In addition to the issues raised in the brief we have made an independent

review of the record. We find and conclude that this appeal presents no

nonfrivolousissues. Accordingly, we relieve counsel from further responsibilities

herein and DISMISS Stepter’s appeal.6
§ 20.1201 Application. ( a ) This subpart applies whenever the Coast Guard suspends a mariner's credential without a hearing under 46 U.S.C. 7702(d).
( b ) The Coast Guard may, for 45 days or less, suspend and seize a merchant mariner credential, license, certificate, or document if, when acting under the authority of the license, certificate, or document,— ( 1 ) A mariner performs a safety-sensitive function on a vessel; and
( 2 ) There is probable cause to believe that he or she— ( i ) Has performed the safety-sensitive function in violation of law or Federal regulation regarding use of alcohol or a dangerous drug;
( ii ) Has been convicted of an offense that would prevent the issuance or renewal of the merchant mariner credential, license, certificate, or document; or,
( iii ) Three years or less before the start of an S&R proceeding, has been convicted of an offense described in subparagraph 205(a)(3)(A) or (B) of the National Driver Register Act of 1982 (23 U.S.C. 401, note).
[CGD 98-3472, 64 FR 28062, May 24, 1999, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11211, Mar. 16, 2009]
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of Palm, Inc.**

Palm Comércio de Aparelhos Eletrônicos Ltda. (Brazil) 

Palm Europe Limited(UK) 

Palm Italy S.r.l. (Italy) 

Palm France SAS (France) 

Palm Germany GmbH (Germany) 

Palm Global Operations Ltd. (Ireland) 

Palm Asia Pacific Limited (Hong Kong) 

Palm Ireland Investment (Ireland) 

Palm Latin America, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.) 

Palm South America, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.) 

Palm Computing Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) 

Palm Chile Limitada (Chile) 

Palm Colombia Limitada (Colombia) 

Palm Benelux B.V. (Netherlands) 

Palm Australasia Pty Ltd. (Australia) 

Palm Canada Inc. (Ontario, Canada) 

Palm Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) 

Palm Geneva SARL (Switzerland) 

Handspring International Ltd. (BVI) 

Handspring Facility Company LLC (Delaware, U.S.)

Handspring Corporation (Delaware, U.S.) 

Palm Trademark Holding Company, LLC (Delaware, U.S.)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 27, 2008



/s/ Thomas F. RoseName:

Thomas F. RoseTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will
be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.