alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 779.236 In general.

Sections 779.201 through 779.235 discuss the various criteria for determining what business unit or units constitute an “enterprise” within the meaning of the Act. Sections 779.237 through 779.245 discuss the criteria for determining what constitutes a “covered enterprise” under the Act with respect to the conditions for coverage of those enterprises in which retail sale of goods or services are made. As explained in §§ 779.2 through 779.4, previously covered employment in retail and service enterprises will be subject to different monetary standards than newly covered employment in such enterprises until February 1, 1971. For this reason the enterprise coverage provisions of both the prior and the amended Act are discussed in the following sections of this subpart.
§ 209.220 Flood control regulations. ( a ) *Local protection works.* On projects authorized subject to specified conditions of local cooperation, no construction is undertaken by the Department of the Army until satisfactory assurances of the required local cooperation have been accepted by the Secretary of the Army and until any lands, easements, and rights-of-way required to be furnished by local interests have been made available for at least a complete unit of the project. The District Engineers notify local interests concerned of the requirements of local cooperation and request assurances by registered mail prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications. Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army for the maintenance and operation of local flood protection works are contained in § 208.10 of this chapter. When assurances satisfactory to the District Engineer are received, they are forwarded through the Division Engineer to the Chief of Engineers for consideration of the Secretary of the Army. The District Engineers advise local interests of the action taken by the Department. Completed projects or completed useful units thereof are normally turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation as soon as the construction and testing of equipment is completed and the project is in proper condition for the assumption of maintenance and operation by local interests. The transfer is accomplished by formal notice from the District Engineer to the local interests that the completed facilities are being turned over to them for maintenance and operation as of a specific date. During construction, District Engineers keep the local interests concerned advised as to the probable date of transfer.
( b ) *Use of storage allocated for flood control or navigation at reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds.* Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with section 7 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 890; 33 U.S.C. 709) are for the purpose of coordinating the operation of the flood control features of reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds and other flood control improvements to obtain the maximum protection from floods which can reasonably be obtained with the proper operation of all flood control improvements. Proposed regulations are determined by the District Engineer in cooperation with the persons responsible for the maintenance and operation of the reservoir involved after a detailed study of the flood problems and the characteristics of the reservoir project. The proposed regulations are forwarded by the District Engineer through the Division Engineer to the Chief of Engineers for consideration of the Secretary of the Army. When approved by the Secretary of the Army, these regulations are published in part 208 of this chapter.
§ 161.23 Reporting exemptions. ( a ) Unless otherwise directed, the following vessels are exempted from providing Position and Final Reports due to the nature of their operation: ( 1 ) Vessels on a published schedule and route;
( 2 ) Vessels operating within an area of a radius of three nautical miles or less; or
( 3 ) Vessels escorting another vessel or assisting another vessel in maneuvering procedures.
( b ) A vessel described in paragraph (a) of this section must: ( 1 ) Provide a Sailing Plan at least 5 minutes but not more than 15 minutes before navigating within the VMRS area; and
( 2 ) If it departs from its promulgated schedule by more than 15 minutes or changes its limited operating area, make the established VMRS reports, or report as directed.
[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36324, July 15, 1994, as amended by CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33364, June 19, 1997; USCG-2003-14757, 68 FR 39367, July 1, 2003]
Exhibit 

32.1 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Lefevre, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: February 13, 2007 | By:/s/			George LeFevre                        			

      George Lefevre CEO |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter of
fiscal year 2008 ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  May 9, 2008
    /s/ Lynn R. BlodgettLynn R. Blodgett, President andChief Executive Officer of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-162108, 333-38236, 333-38250, 333-47326,
333-87092 and 333-97787), Form S-3 (No. 333-152944) and Form S-3 filed as
post-effective amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No.
333-103434) of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2010
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Krispy Kreme
Doughnuts, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K.




/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPRaleigh, North Carolina


April 15, 2010




---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Luminary Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31,
2007 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  March 28, 2008
#### Rose Kirkwood v. Exchange National Bank of Hastings.

Filed May 2, 1894.

No. 5591.

Error frdm the district court of Adams county. Tried below before G-aslin, J.

*L. W. Billingsley*and *B. J. Gh’eene,*for plaintiff in error.

*Tibbets, Morey & Ferris, eonlra.*

Per Curiam.

The record in this case presenting precisely the same questions as'those in *Kirkwood v. First Nat. Bank of Hastings,*40 Neb., 484, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case.

Judgment accordingly.
Order entered November 13 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00234
- CR JOHN HENRY WILSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F12
- 55608
- S



### O RDER On September 19, 2013, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a cost bill and accompanying documents. When the supplemental record was not filed by October, 1 4, 2013, this Court again ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a cost bill and accompanying documents. To date, the Dallas County District Clerk still has not filed the supplemental clerk’s record conta ining the cost bill and accompanying documents. Accordingly, this Court ORDERS Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, to file by NOVEMBER 21, 2013 a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001,the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entit led to

receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee. If the Court does not receive the supplemental clerk’s record by the date specified, the Court will utilize the available remedies to obtain the supplemental clerk’s record, including ordering that Gary Fitzsimmons show cause why he should not be held in contempt for not complying with th is Court’s order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA M YERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC 1350
                (Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

         I, Levi Mochkin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Avenue Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the annual report on Form 10KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003
of the Company (the "Report"):

                  1. the report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date: March 29, 2004

                                       BY: /s/ Levi Mochkin
                                           Levi Mochkin
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 138.210 Applicability.

This subpart applies to you if you are a responsible party for a vessel, a deepwater port, or an onshore facility (including, but not limited to, motor vehicles, rolling stock and onshore pipelines), unless your liability is unlimited under OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(c)).
Florida Department of Elder Affairs

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this three-year CapacityBuilding grant are to do the following:

• Goal 1: Develop capacity in areas with no 

or limited evidence-based program 

infrastructure to introduce, deliver, and 

expand the reach (program participants 

and completers) of evidence-based 

chronic disease self-management 

education (CDSME) and self-management 

support programs within underserved 

geographic areas and/or populations to 

improve their confidence in managing 

their chronic condition(s). 

• Goal 2: Develop a business plan with 

strategies to support the proposed 

programs during and beyond the grant 

period.

The Florida Department of Elder Affairs (FDOEA)

and its partners will do the following: 

• Implement at least one CDSME workshop 

in targeted counties;

• Increase participant recruitment efforts

for CDSME;

• Improve participant health outcomes by 

ensuring program fidelity; and

• Convene strategic partners and other 

stakeholders on a regular basis through a

steering committee focused on program

sustainability.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, FDOEA will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Area Agency on Aging for Southwest 

Florida

• County health departments

• Florida’s Agency for Health Care

Administration

• Florida Department of Health

• Florida Health Networks

• Other organizations in Florida’s aging 

network

Anticipated Results

The FDOEA and its partners propose to achieve 

the following results: 

• Provide CDSME to 240 underserved older 

adults and adults with disabilities;
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

• Achieve a 70% participant completion 

rate; 

• Increase coverage of CDSME to six 

counties in the target project area;

• Expand program access to 

underserved target populations; 

• Improve participants’ confidence, healthy 

behaviors, and self-efficacy as measured 

by pre-and-post outcome surveys; and

• Produce a strategic business plan focused 

on the sustainability of the program 

beyond the grant period. 

Contact:

Mary Hodges 

Florida Department of Elder Affairs

Email: hodgesma@elderaffairs.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
****

# **Proclamation TEMPLATE**

Support from a public official can raise community awareness about Older Americans Month. Use this template to create a public recognition of the older adults in your community. Fill in placeholder information and edit the content to be as relevant as possible to your community.

# Older Americans Month 2020

## A Proclamation

Whereas**,** [community/area] includes a growing number of older Americans who make countless contributions to our community every day; and 

Whereas**,**[community/area] is stronger when people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds are included and encouraged to make their mark; and

Whereas**,** [community/area] recognizes the importance of the physical, mental, social, and emotional well-being of its citizens; and

Whereas**,**[community/area] can support our community members by: 

· promoting independence, inclusion, and participation;

· engaging older adults through education, recreation, and service; and

· connecting people with opportunities to share their time, experience, and talents.

Now, therefore**,**[I/we] of [city/town, state or community/area] do hereby proclaim May 2020 to be Older Americans Month. [I/we] urge every resident to recognize older adults and the people who support them as essential members of our community.

Dated this [day] day of [month], 2020

[Name of person/entity approving proclamation]

[Seal, if applicable]

# image1.emf
#### § 174.5 Requirements for approval.

The Commandant approves a State numbering system if he or she finds, after examination of the information submitted by a State, that the State numbering system and vessel casualty reporting system meet the requirements of this part, 46 U.S.C. 6102, and 46 U.S.C. Chapter 123.

[CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33365, June 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35533, June 30, 1998; USCG-2003-15404, 68 FR 37742, June 25, 2003]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4794 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4794

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 24 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the Secretary of the Interior to complete a resource study 
    of the 600 mile route through Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, 
 Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and 
 Virginia, used by George Washington and General Rochambeau during the 
                      American Revolutionary War.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary 
Route National Heritage Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF THE WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date on which 
funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 
and the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives, a 
resource study of the 600 mile route through Connecticut, Delaware, 
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode 
Island, and Virginia, used by George Washington and General Jean 
Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur, comte de Rochambeau during the American 
Revolutionary War.
    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study required by subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall consult with State and local historic 
associations and societies, State historic preservation agencies, and 
other appropriate organizations.
    (c) Contents.--The study shall--
            (1) identify the full range of resources and historic 
        themes associated with the route referred to in subsection (a), 
        including its relationship to the American Revolutionary War;
            (2) identify alternatives for National Park Service 
        involvement with preservation and interpretation of the route 
        referred to in subsection (a); and
            (3) include cost estimates for any necessary acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives identified pursuant to 
        paragraph (2).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Martha C. Morrison,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
``

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
 of Sona Development Corp. (Registrant) for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Nora Coccaro, chief executive
 officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
 to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents,
 in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by
 this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant
 to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
 Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
 before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
 in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required
 by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to
 the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Chart

Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 

Developmental Disabilities Councils - FY 2012 Program Performance Report

Performance Measure 2 - Systems Change 

# Chart2

# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Harvey Posner, Also Known as Harvey Possner, Respondent.

Decided September 12, 1996

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]).