alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Bruce Benn, of Validian Corporation, certify that: (1)I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, on Form 10_KSB/A, of Validian Corporation;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  (4)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: May 29, 2007  By: /s/ Bruce Benn Bruce Benn Chief Executive Officer
§ 20.903 Records of proceedings. ( a ) The transcript of testimony at the hearing, all exhibits received into evidence, any items marked as exhibits and not received into evidence, all motions, all applications, all requests, and all rulings constitute the official record of a proceeding. This record also includes any motions or other matters regarding the disqualification of the ALJ.
( b ) Any person may examine the record of a proceeding at the U. S. Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge Docketing Center; Room 412; 40 S. Gay Street; Baltimore, MD 21201-4022. Any person may obtain a copy of part or all of the record after payment of reasonable costs for duplicating it in accordance with 49 CFR part 7.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Ch.23 – Selecting a Process

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Ch.23 – Selecting a Process Ch.23 – Selecting a ProcessADR2022-02-19T08:44:36-05:00
			
			Ch.23 – Selecting a ProcessChapter 01 of this Guide, DR Processes introduced the well-established forms of ADR.  Chapter 23 now explores those basic forms by comparing them to one another in order to aid in the selection of the appropriate process.  The fundamental measure of these processes is the degree of control the parties are willing to give the neutral.  Understanding how these processes compare helps a party select a method that is appropriate.

**LEARN MORE**
Comparing the ADR Processes
Considerations for Selecting an ADR Process

Subpages (2): Comparing ADR Processes | Process-Selection Considerations Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
EXHIBIT 31.1

Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer



I, Yanlin Han, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  |                        
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Yanlin Han         
|                      |  | Yanlin Han             
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the Form
10-Q for  September  30, 1996,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000086940
<NAME> SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                          SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                 445,452
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                 1,786
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     55,260
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                   40,530
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            543,028
<COMMON>                                                   54,223
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                   8,688
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                       110,930
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                            173,841
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0 
<PREFERRED>                                                35,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                      125,346 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                          1,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  30,000 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                   0 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                       0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                 6,480 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                              602 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                            170,259 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                             543,028 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                 185,840 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                       15,313 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                137,637 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                152,950 
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                    32,890
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                           (267)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                             32,623
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    9,466
<NET-INCOME>                                               23,157
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                 1,743
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                              21,414
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                   14,400
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                       0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                     40,367
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        


</TABLE>
[Cite as Anderson v. Greater Clevelan d Regional Transit Auth. , 2018-Ohio-4596.]

{¶1} On January 18, January 23, and March 29 of 2018, requester Jason Anderson and representatives acting on his behalf made 94 public records requests to respondent Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA). (Complaint at 2-15; Response, Exh. B.) The RTA provided thousands of pages of responsive records, noted that several requests were overly broad, and indicated that it had no records responsive to some requests. (Response at 2, 5-6; Jackson Aff. at ¶ 5-17; Exhs. C-E, G, I.) {¶2} On April 4, 2018, Anderson filed a complaint under R.C. 2743.75 alleging public records access violations by the RTA. The complaint failed to attach the responses of the RTA or to state with clarity how access to public records had been denied. The court directed Anderson to submit an amended complaint separately listing each request for which he was seeking relief and the request letter(s) in which it was made. (April 9, 2018, Order.) On April 27, 2018, Anderson filed an amended complaint in which he alleged that the RTA had failed to make records available within a reasonable period of time with respect to fourteen of the original 94 requests. R.C. 149.43(B)(1). (Am. Complaint at 2-3.) On July 24, 2018, the RTA filed its response (Response) asserting that under the fact s and circumstances of this case it had provided records within a reasonable period of time. On August 13, 2018, Anderson filed a reply. JASON A. ANDERSON

Requester

v.

GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Respondent Case No. 2018-00593PQ

Judge Patrick M. McGrath

JUDGMENT ENTRYCase No. 2018-00593PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶3} On August 21, 2018, Special Master Jeffery Clark issued a report finding that under the facts and circumstances of the case the 23 business days taken by the RTA to provide records responsive to the requests was a reasonable period of time. The Special Master recommended the court issue an order denying Anderson’s claim. {¶4} R.C. 2743.75(F)(2) states, in part: “Either party may object to the report and recommendation within seven business days after receiving the report and recommendation by filing a written objection with the clerk * * *.” No objections were filed by either party. The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Special Master’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the Special Master’s report and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and

conclusions of law contained therein. {¶5} Court costs are assessed against the requester. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

PATRICK M. MCGRATH Judge

Filed October 19, 2018 Sent to S.C. Reporter 11/14/18
Michigan State University (MSU) Extension 

îìîïChronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee 

Goals 

The overall purposes of this 4-year grant are to: 

Goal 1: Develop capacity to increase the number of older adults and adults with disabilities who 

participate in evidence-based Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) and selfmanagement support programs to empower them to better manage their chronic conditions. 

Goal 2: Identify and implement one or more robust strategies that will promote the sustainability 

of evidence-based self-management education and self-management support programs. 

Strategies and Activities 

The grantee and its partners will: 

ξ Implement programs in Michigan counties with the highest rates of arthritis in the state.

ξ Increase engagement of underserved adults with disabilities and Spanish speaking/Latinx older adults.

ξ Offer evidence-based programs that include both in-person and remote delivery options.

ξ Train new leaders, including bilingual staff, to deliver community-based educational programs.

Proposed Interventions 

ξ Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) (in-person and remote) 

ξ Chronic Pain Self-Management Program (CPSMP) (in-person and remote) 

ξ Walk with Ease (WWE) (in-person and remote) 

ξ Tomando Control de su Salud (in-person and remote)

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2023, effective May 1, 2023 

1 of 2 
Partnerships 

To achieve the goals of the grant, grantee will collaborate with the following key partners: 

ξ The Disability Network of Northern Michigan 

ξ Arthritis Foundation of Michigan 

ξ Living Healthy in Michigan Partner Network 

ξ Seven area agencies on aging in the lower peninsula of Michigan 

ξ Corewell Health System (Spectrum Health and Beaumont Health) 

ξ Michigan Center for Rural Health 

ξ Meijer Specialty Pharmacies 

Anticipated Results 

The grantee and its partners propose to achieve the following results: 

ξ Reach 1,230 participants across all proposed evidence-based programs.

ξ Increase the number of CDSME and support program referrals by 240 (60 per year). 

ξ Develop a "Fund Development and Sustainability Planning" subcommittee for long-term program support.

ξ Establish and support ongoing infrastructure to offer multiple programs in Spanish.

ξ Strengthen statewide partnerships with diverse stakeholders for efficient and robuse program delivery.

Contact: 

Cheryl Eschbach Ph.D., Director, Health and Nutrition Institute 

Michican State University Extension 

cheryl@msu.edu 

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

Washington, DC 20201 

http://www.acl.gov 

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2023, effective May 1, 2023 

2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service gives notice of the following meeting: 

# DATE AND TIME:

Monday, June 12, 2000, 8:30-11:30 a.m. 

# PLACE:

The Westin Seattle, Rooms Vashon 1 & 2, 1900 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. 

# STATUS:

Open. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

I. Chair's Opening Remarks 

II. Swearing-In of New Board Members 

III. Approval of March Board Meeting Minutes 

IV. Status Report by the Chief Executive Officer 

V. Committee Reports 

A. Executive Committee 

B. Management, Budget, and Governance Committee 

C. Planning and Evaluation Committee 

D. Communications Committee Report on Corporate Initiatives Report on AmeriCorps Alumni Activities 

VI. Presentations by Officials and Projects from the State of Washington 

VII. Discussion of Results of 2000 Grant Processes 

A. Learn and Serve America 

B. AmeriCorps 

VIII. AmeriCorps*VISTA Plans 

IX. Future Board Meeting Dates 

X. Public Comment 

XI. Adjournment 

# ACCOMMODATIONS:

Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation should notify the Corporation's contact person. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Rhonda Taylor, Deputy Director of Special Projects and Initiatives, Office of Public Liaison, Corporation for National Service, 8th Floor, Room 8619, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20525. Phone (202) 606-5000 ext. 282. Fax (202) 565-2794. TDD: (202) 565-2799. 

Dated: June 2, 2000. 

Thomasenia P. Duncan, 

General Counsel, Corporation for National and Community Service. 

[FR Doc. 00-14368 Filed 6-2-00; 4:19 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130992 (70)(75) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130992 

 COA: 264165 

Wayne CC: 04-408824-CK

WAYNE STEEL ERECTORS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 5, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. The motion to stay the effect of the Court’s order is DENIED as 

moot. 

t0314 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 21, 2007 

 Clerk
Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 1 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 2 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 3 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 4 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 5 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 6 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 7 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 8 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 9 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 11 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 12 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 13 of 14
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20391-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 14 of 14
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-22745-RKA

LAURENCE MOSKOWITZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS 

INC AND NISSAN-INFINITI LT LLC,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF

DEFENDANT NISSAN-INFINITI LT LLC

Plaintiff Laurence Moskowitz and Defendant Nissan-Infiniti LT LLC, by and through 

respective undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, file this Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of the above styled 

action with respect to Defendant Nissan-Infiniti LT LLC only. 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Case 1:22-cv-22745-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2022 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Thomas J. Patti 

THOMAS PATTI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 118377

E-mail: tom@pzlg.legal

VICTOR ZABALETA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 118517

E-mail: victor@pzlg.legal

PATTI ZABALETA LAW GROUP

3325 Northwest 55th Street

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309

Phone: 561-542-8550

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

 /s/ Alyssa N. Weiss 

Joseph A. Apatov, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 93546

Alyssa Weiss, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 1032088

MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD

One East Broward Blvd., Ste. 1400

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 356-2516

japatov@mcglinchey.com

aweiss@mcglinchey.com

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

NISSAN-INFINITI LT LLC

Case 1:22-cv-22745-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2022 Page 2 of 2