alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           3,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                       995
<INVENTORY>                                     12,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,995
<PP&E>                                          41,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,342
<BONDS>                                         15,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,434
<SALES>                                         43,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,107
<CGS>                                           23,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                       785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,302
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 116
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 116 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35012, June 19, 2008 and USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 49410, Aug. 13, 2010.

§ 116.55 Appeals. ( a ) Except for the decision to issue an Order to Alter, if a complainant disagrees with a recommendation regarding obstruction or eligibility made by a District Commander, or the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs, the complainant may appeal that decision to the Deputy Commandant for Operations.
( b ) The appeal must be submitted in writing to the Commandant (CG-DCO-D), Attn: Deputy for Operations Policy and Capabilities, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7318, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7318, within 60 days after the District Commander's or the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs decision. The Deputy Commandant for Operations will make a decision on the appeal within 90 days after receipt of the appeal. The Deputy Commandant of Operations' decision of this appeal shall constitute final agency action.
( c ) Any Order of Apportionment made or issued under section 6 of the Truman-Hobbs Act, 33 U.S.C. 516, may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals for any judicial circuit in which the bridge in question is wholly or partly located, if a petition for review is filed within 90 days after the date of issuance of the order. The review is described in section 10 of the Truman-Hobbs Act, 33 U.S.C. 520. The review proceedings do not operate as a stay of any order issued under the Truman-Hobbs Act, other than an order of apportionment, nor relieve any bridge owner of any liability or penalty under other provisions of that act.
[CGD 91-063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, 1996; CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33363, June 19, 1997; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35013, June 19, 2008; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36283, June 25, 2010; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38433, July 7, 2014]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 669 

Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding Hispanic scientists 

in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. MARTINEZ (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Florida, and Mr. SALAZAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the efforts and contributions of outstanding 

Hispanic scientists in the United States. 

Whereas the purpose of the National Hispanic Scientist of 

the Year Award is to recognize outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States who promote a greater public 

understanding of science and motivate Hispanic youth to 

develop an interest in science; 

Whereas the 8th annual National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Gala will be held at the Museum of Science and Industry in Tampa, Florida, on Saturday, October 11, 

2008; 

Whereas proceeds from the National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Gala support scholarships for Hispanic boys and 

girls to participate in the Youth Enriched by Science 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 669 IS 

Program of the Museum of Science and Industry, known 

as the ‘‘YES! Team’’; 

Whereas a need to acknowledge the work and effort of outstanding Hispanic scientists in the United States has led 

to the selection of Dr. Lydia Villa-Komaroff as the honoree of the 8th annual National Hispanic Scientist of the 

Year Award; 

Whereas Dr. Villa-Komaroff is an internationally recognized 

molecular biologist who is deeply committed to the recruitment and retention of minorities in science; 

Whereas Dr. Villa-Komaroff currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Cytonome, Inc., a company building the 

first optical cell sorter capable of supporting rapid, sterile 

sorting of human cells for therapeutic use; and 

Whereas Dr. Villa-Komaroff was a key member of the research team that first demonstrated that bacterial cells 

produce insulin and her varied and active professional life 

includes research positions at the Massachusetts Institute 

of Technology, Harvard University, and the University of 

Massachusetts Medical Center: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes efforts to educate, support, and 

3 provide hope for the Hispanic community, including 

4 efforts— 

5 (A) to honor outstanding Hispanic sci6 entists in the United States at the annual Na7 tional Hispanic Scientist of the Year Gala; and 

8 (B) to motivate Hispanic youth to study 

9 science through ‘‘Meet the Hispanic Scientist 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 669 IS 

1 Day’’, an opportunity for Hispanic youth to 

2 meet the honoree of the National Hispanic Sci3 entist of the Year Award; and 

4 (2) congratulates the 2008 National Hispanic 

5 Scientist of the Year designated by the Museum of 

6 Science and Industry, for ongoing dedication to im7 proving the quality of, and access to, science and en8 gineering research and education. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Cherokee County Health Services Council

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

1 of 2

Goals

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for addressing behavioral health 

and/or chronic pain among older adults 

and adults with disabilities living in your 

community.

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based selfmanagement education and/or selfmanagement support programs to 

empower them to better manage these 

chronic condition(s), while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

Strategies and Activities

The Cherokee County Health Services Council 

(CCHSC) and its partners will:

• Engage 259 older adults and adults living 

with disabilities living in Tahlequah, 

Cherokee County;

• Develop partnerships with interested 

community-based organizations;

• Develop a long-term strategy for 

addressing chronic pain; and,

• Train leaders and master trainers to build 

program capacity.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program (CDSMP)

• Diabetes Self-Management Program

(DSMP)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, CCHSC will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Cherokee Elder Care

• Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma

• Cherokee County Health Coalition

• Davis Retirement Apartments

• Go Ye Village

• Northeastern Health Systems

• Northeastern Oklahoma Community 

Health Centers, FQHC

• Tahlequah Senior Citizens Center

• United Keetoowah Band

• Wisdom Keepers
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Anticipated Results

CCHSC and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results:

• Engage 259 Caring for Tahlequah in 

CDSME programs;

• Develop a CDSME sustainability plan; 

and, 

• Achieve a 74% program completion rate. 

Contact:

Contact for more information contact:

D.J Battiest-Tomasi, MBS Caring for Tahlequah -

Director

dj.battiest.tomasi.cchsc@gmail.com

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
may 

2020

Make Your

MARK!

visit acl .gov/oam for more information.
may 

2020

Make Your

MARK!

visit acl .gov/oam for more information.
may 

2020

Make Your

MARK!

visit acl .gov/oam for more information.
may 

2020

Make Your

MARK!

visit acl .gov/oam for more information.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.115 Safety and Security Zones; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, Massachusetts. ( a ) *Location.* All waters of Cape Cod Bay and land adjacent to those waters enclosed by a line beginning at position 41°56′59.3′′ N, 070°34′58.5′′ W; thence to 1°57′12.2′′ N, 070°34′41.9′′ W; thence to 41°56′42.3′′ N, 070°34′00.1′′ W; thence to 41°56′29.5′′ N, 070°34′14.5′′ W.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in §§ 165.23 and 165.33 of this part, entry into or movement within these zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Boston.
( 2 ) All vessel operators shall comply with the instructions of the COTP or the designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel. On-scene Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels.
( 3 ) No person may enter the waters or land area within the boundaries of the safety and security zones unless previously authorized by the Captain of the Port, Boston or his authorized patrol representative.
[CGD01-02-002, 67 FR 37693, May 30, 2002, as amended by USCG-2009-0311, 74 FR 50925, Oct. 2, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4831 Received in Senate (RDS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4831

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 11 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2339 North California Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Roberto 
                        Clemente Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2339 
North California Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Logan 
Square Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Roberto 
Clemente Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roberto Clemente Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 31, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 31, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0158. WCE HOLDINGS B, LLC v. JOHNNY WHITEHEAD et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18A69643 18A68844
exh10-87.htm




Exhibit 10.87







LOAN AGREEMENT


 


(Addendum No. 4)


 







WHEREAS:


 


 



	
·     

	
This addendum serves to update the Loan Agreement (attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K/A-2 Coronus Solar Inc. filed with the SEC on December 10, 2010) between Jefferson Thachuk (the “Lender”) and Coronus Solar Inc. (the “Borrower”), and subsequently updated by Addendum No. 1, dated June 20, 2011 (attached as Exhibit 10.35 to the Form 10-K Coronus Solar Inc. filed with the SEC on June 27, 2011), by Addendum No. 2, dated October 26, 2011 (attached as Exhibit 10.44 to the Form 10-Q Coronus Solar Inc. filed with the SEC on November 14, 2011), and by Addendum No. 3, dated February 8, 2012 (attached as Exhibit 10.46 to the Form 10-Q Coronus Solar Inc. filed with the SEC on February 15, 2012).







 


 



	
·     

	
This addendum is current as of April 18, 2012.







 


 



	
·     

	
A detailed chronology of the Loans, subsequent to December 29, 2011  is attached to this addendum as Exhibit A.







 


 



	
·     

	
As at March 31, 2012, the principal amount of the Loans totaled CAD $218,500, plus USD $6,600.







 


 



	
·     

	
As at April 18, 2012, the principal amount of the Loans totaled CAD $218,500, plus USD $6,600.







 


 


RESOLVED:


 


This addendum fairly and accurately characterizes the subsequent loan activity between the Lender and the Borrower.


 







 







 






  





1











  













 


DATED:  this 18th day of April, 2012.


 







 







 



	
Jefferson Thachuk

	  	
David Holmes


	
Jefferson Thachuk

	  	
David Holmes


	
Lender

	  	
Coronus Solar Inc., Director


	  	  	  
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Kenneth Bogas

	  	  
	
Kenneth Bogas

	  	  
	
Coronus Solar Inc., Director

	  	  










 







 







 







 







 







 







 






  





2











  













 



	
EXHIBIT A


	  
	
Loans from Shareholder - Jeff Thachuk


	
As at April 18, 2012


	  	  	
CAD

	  	
USD


	
Date

	
Source

	
Principal

	  	
Principal


	  	  	  	  	  
	
29-Dec-11

	
Opening Balance

	
225,850

	  	
6,600


	
11-Jan-12

	
Deposit

	
1,000

	  	
-


	
30-Jan-12

	
Deposit

	
1,000

	  	  
	
23-Feb-12

	
Repayment

	
(12,800)

	  	  
	
2-Mar-12

	
Deposit

	
7,500

	  	  
	
30-Mar-12

	
Repayment

	
(4,000)

	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
 Total

	  	
CAD         218,500

	  	
USD             6,600












 







 







 







 







 







 







 







 







 







 






  





3
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4787

To designate the Federal building located at 600 East First Street in Rome,

Georgia, as the ‘‘Lawrence Patton McDonald Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. BARR of Georgia (for himself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. LINDER, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP, and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 600 East First

Street in Rome, Georgia, as the ‘‘Lawrence Patton

McDonald Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 600 East First Street

5 in Rome, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the

6 ‘‘Lawrence Patton McDonald Federal Building’’.
2

•HR 4787 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Lawrence Patton McDonald Federal

6 Building’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7544

ROSCOE GOINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-03-608-5-H)

Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roscoe Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roscoe Goins seeks to appeal from the grant of summary

judgment in favor of the State on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that jurists of reason would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Goins has

not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
oRICINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE PETITION OF

MARK J. HARTWIG

PR 20-0004 FILED

APR 14 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Olen< of

e

Supren-i 

tene

e Court

OR8tR

of n/Inn 

Mark J. Hartwig has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State

Bar of Montana after having been on inactive status since May 2017.

IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of

Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in the state of Montana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order,

Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena,

MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education to

be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this \ LA day of April, 2020.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

04/14/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-cv-81327-MIDDLEBROOKS 

JAMES BRANDON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

PARAMOUNT RECOVERY SYSTEMS, L.P., 

et al., 

Defendants. 

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff and Defendant Healthcare Revenue 

Recovery Group, LLC's Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, filed January 11 , 2023 . (DE 49). 

The Court congratulates the Parties on their amicable resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant 

to Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties' Stipulation is 

self-executing and no order of the Court is required to dismiss this action. Plaintiffs claims against 

Paramount Recovery Systems, L.P. remain pending. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 

(1) Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC's are 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

(2) The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE Defendant Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, 

LLC as a defendant in this case. 

(3) Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. 

(4) Pursuant this Court's Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Retain Jurisdiction (DE 48), this 

Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement. Jurisdiction will be 

reserved for a period of 60 days. 

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this/.; day 

D ALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies to: Counsel of Record 

Case 9:22-cv-81327-DMM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.140 Tank vessel inspections. ( a ) Before issuing a letter under § 157.142, the Coast Guard makes an initial inspection of each U.S. tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) and each foreign tank vessel whose owner or operator submitted the plans under § 157.102 to determine whether or not, when entering a port, the cargo tanks that carry crude oil meet the following: ( 1 ) After each tank is crude oil washed but not water rinsed, except the bottom of the tank may be flushed with water and stripped, each tank is essentially free of oil residues to a degree acceptable to the Coast Guard inspector.
( 2 ) After the tanks that are to be used as ballast tanks when leaving the port are crude oil washed and stripped but not water rinsed or bottom flushed, they are filled with water and the total volume of crude oil floating on top of the water in these tanks is 0.085 percent or less of the total volume of these tanks.
( b ) Except on a tank vessel under § 157.10(e), if the initial inspection under paragraph (a) of this section has been passed and the vessel arrives at the first cargo loading port after completing a ballast voyage, the Coast Guard monitors the discharge of effluent from those tanks that have been crude oil washed, water rinsed, stripped, and filled with ballast water to determine whether or not the oil content of the effluent is 15 ppm or less.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43709, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11628, Mar. 22, 1985; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]