alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: Colorado Department of Human Services 

Name of ADRCs and Healthcare Partners: 

Mesa ARCH (Adult Resource for Care and Help), Mesa County Health Department, Colorado 

Foundation for Medical Care (QIO), and St. Mary’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Todd Coffey 

 303-866-2750 

 todd.coffey@state.co.us

Evidence Based Care Transition Model: Care Transitions InterventionSM

Project Summary: 

The Colorado Department of Human Services (CDHS) and the Colorado Department of Health 

Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) are requesting funding from the Administration on Aging 

(AoA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to fund a two-year grant for 

the continuation of transitional care improvement in Mesa County’s Aging and Disability 

Resource Center (ADRC) known in Colorado as Adult Resources for Care and Help (ARCH). 

Mesa County was a participant community in Colorado’s Quality Improvement Organizations 

(QIO), the Colorado Foundation for Medical Care (CFMC) Transitions of Care pilot project. 

Goal/Objectives: 

The primary goal of a transitions coaching program is to increase effective self-management 

capacity of people following a hospitalization and to reduce unplanned re-hospitalizations. The 

objectives are to: 1) standardize and formalize the coaching processes first introduced in 2007; 2) 

measure decrease for hospital readmission rates at 14-days, 30-days, 60-days, 90-days; 3) 

formalize the Care Transitions Taskforce structure as a subcommittee to the Quality Health 

Network’s Quality Oversight Committee; and 4) over the two-year project aim to serve and 

coach 800 patients. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

Primary outcomes are to increase effective self-management capacity of people following a 

hospitalization and to reduce unplanned re-hospitalizations.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Part IV – Disputes & Appeals","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Bm63avkEPv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/part4\/\">Part IV – Disputes & Appeals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/part4\/embed\/#?secret=Bm63avkEPv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Part IV – Disputes & Appeals” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"Bm63avkEPv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 168.01 Purpose. ( a ) This part prescribes regulations in accordance with section 4116(c) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) (Pub. L. 101-380), as amended by section 711 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-281). The regulations will reduce the risk of oil spills from laden, single hull and double hull tankers over 5,000 GT by requiring that these tankers be escorted by at least two suitable escort vessels in applicable waters, as defined in § 168.40. The escort vessels will be immediately available to influence the tankers' speed and course in the event of a steering or propulsion equipment failure, thereby reducing the possibility of groundings or collisions.
( b ) The regulations in this part establish minimum escort vessel requirements. Nothing in these regulations should be construed as relieving the master of a tanker from the duty to operate the vessel in a safe and prudent manner, taking into account the navigational constraints of the waterways to be traversed, other vessel traffic, and anticipated weather, tide, and sea conditions, which may require reduced speeds, greater assistance from escort vessels, or other operational precautions.
[CGD 91-202, 59 FR 42968, Aug. 19, 1994, as amended by USCG-2012-0975, 78 FR 50339, Aug. 19, 2013]
CONTACT:
  Richard Becht
  (716) 655-3800



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


          ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION REPORTS FIRST QUARTER RESULTS


     EAST AURORA, N.Y., October 26, 1998 -- Acme Electric Corporation
(NYSE:ACE) announced today that for the first quarter ended October 3,
1998, consolidated net sales were $22,378,000 with net income of $522,000,
compared with net sales of $22,179,000 and net income of $170,000, for the
comparable period in the prior year.

     Robert J. McKenna, Chairman and CEO, stated that, "Operationally, we
continue to make good progress.  Our main focus is on the development of
new business, as we attempt to fill the pending void being created by the
loss of Cisco's' business in January.  We are particularly encouraged by
new programs with two new customers that should begin producing positive
results in late spring."

     Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the design
and manufacture of power conversion equipment for electronic and electrical
systems for industrial, commercial, residential, and military and aerospace
applications.  Corporate headquarters are in East Aurora, N.Y., with
operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C., and Tempe, Ariz.

                                  # # # #
ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Comparative Analysis
(in thousands, except per share data)



                                    For the 13 Weeks Ended

                                    10/03/98      09/27/97
                                    --------      --------

Net Sales                            $22,378       $22,179

Net Income                               522           170

Net Income Per Common Share
  (Basic and Diluted)                   $.10          $.03

Weighted Average Number of Shares
  Outstanding Used to Compute
  Income Per Common Share:
    Basic                              5,054         5,042
    Diluted                            5,068         5,052


Company news is available by FAX: dial 1-800-758-5804, and input extension
006675; or visit our web site at acmeelec.com
Exhibit 31(a)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Alan R. Abrams, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: September 14, 2005 /s/ Alan R. Abrams   Alan R. Abrams   Chief Executive Officer
§ 207.270 Tallahatchie River, Miss., between Batesville and the mouth; logging. ( a ) The floating of “sack”, rafts, or of loose timbers, logs, or cribs is prohibited.
( b ) Rafts shall be made up of logs parallel with each other, secured, and held closely together by cross sticks, chains, or cables placed across each crib and at the joints between cribs. No raft shall be over 60 feet wide or 800 feet long.
( c ) In rafting nonbuoyant timber each crib must contain self-buoyant logs in such proportion of “floaters” to “sinkers” as will safely float the whole; and in assembling such cribs, extra strong connections must be used to prevent the breaking up of a crib or the detachment of individual logs.
( d ) No raft shall be moved at river stages less than that corresponding to a reading of 34 ⁄ 10 feet on the U.S. Weather Bureau gage at Greenwood, Miss.
( e ) A raft in transit must be accompanied by sufficient men, or by power boats of sufficient capacity to properly manage the movement of the raft and to keep it from being an obstruction to other craft navigating the river, or from forming jams at bridges.
( f ) Rafts in transit must be so floated, and when not in transit be so tied to the bank, as not to interfere with the passage of boats.
( g ) When rafts are left with no one in attendance they must be securely tied at each end and at as many intermediate points as will prevent them from bagging into the stream. When left at night a white light shall be exposed at each end of the raft.
( h ) This section shall apply to the portion of the Tallahatchie River, Miss., between Batesville, Panola County, Miss., and the mouth.
[Regs. Feb. 18, 1918, as amended at 25 FR 8908, Sept. 16, 1960]
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Neutral Selection

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Neutral Selection Neutral SelectionADR2022-02-17T18:46:40-05:00
			
			Neutral Selection**Personal Styles**
The CBCA prides itself on its wide range of accomplished judge neutrals.  All the judges at the CBCA are skilled and experienced ADR providers.  Each has his or her own style, so if a particular type or style of ADR process is desired, the interested parties may discuss this with the judge before the proceeding.  Judge neutrals can provide services during CBCA ADR proceedings that range from the least invasive facilitation, through evaluative mediation, to binding or non-binding arbitration, as well as any other ADR process in between.
**Appointment**
The Board Chairman appoints CBCA judge neutrals several different ways. If desired, the parties may request the appointment of a particular judge(s). If the parties request that a particular CBCA judge be assigned, the request usually will be honored, depending on the requested judge’s availability.  Alternatively, the parties may wish to consider submitting to the Chairman a list of mutually agreed upon judge neutrals.  If particular time constraints are mentioned, the Chairman may query the judges’ availability prior to making the assignment.  If no particular judge is requested and there are no apparent time constraints, the Chairman will usually assign a judge neutral on a rotational basis.  In a docketed appeal, the parties may also request that the presiding judge serve as the judge neutral for the ADR proceeding.  If the parties elect a non-binding ADR procedure and the implementation of the procedure does not result in a settlement, where the procedure has involved ex parte contact, the judge neutral may retain the case for adjudication as the presiding judge, but only if the parties and the presiding judge all agree to such retention.  If the procedure has not involved ex parte contact, the judge neutral, after considering the parties’ views, may retain the case as the presiding judge at his or her discretion.
****
**Cost**
The Board provides judge neutrals to agencies within its jurisdiction free of charge.  For agencies whose issues in controversy do not fall within the CBCA’s jurisdiction, the Board may provide ADR services on a reimbursable basis. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10166

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

John Steven Vo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-321-1

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

John Steven Vo appeals the sentence, which is within the suggested 

sentencing range, imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. 

Vo argues that his 24-month sentence is greater than necessary to achieve the 

sentencing goals set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because he was less culpable 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10166 Document: 00516558049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2022
No. 22-10166

2

than his codefendant in the possession-of-stolen-mail offense that 

contributed to Vo’s revocation. 

The record reflects that the district court’s justification for imposing 

the revocation sentence was reasoned, fact-specific, and consistent with the 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors. See United States v. Warren, 720 F.3d 321, 332-

33 (5th Cir. 2013). The district court undertook an individualized assessment 

of the facts and concluded that a sentence of 24 months in prison was proper 

to satisfy the aims of § 3553(a). There is no indication that the district court 

did not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, gave 

significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or otherwise 

committed reversible error in balancing the sentencing factors. See Warren, 

720 F.3d at 332. Thus, the district court’s decision to impose a 24-month

sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See id. at 332-33.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-10166 Document: 00516558049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. 

_________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Dana J. McElroy of Thomas & LoCicero PL hereby gives notice of her appearance as 

counsel on behalf of proposed intervenors The New York Times Company, CBS Broadcasting 

Inc., and Times Publishing Company. The certificate of service for all pleadings, orders, and other 

papers in this action should include Dana J. McElroy at Thomas & LoCicero PL, 915 Middle 

River Drive, Suite 309, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304 (dmcelroy@tlolawfirm.com; 

bbrennan@tlolawfirm.com).

Dated: August 31, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS & LOCICERO PL

/s/ Dana J. McElroy

 Dana J. McElroy (FBN 845906)

 915 Middle River Drive, Suite 309

 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304

 Telephone: (954) 703-3418

 Facsimile: (954) 400-5415

 dmcelroy@tlolawfirm.com

bbrennan@tlolawfirm.com

Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors The New

York Times Company, CBS Broadcasting Inc., and 

Times Publishing Company

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 31st day of August, 2022, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all parties and counsel of record via transmission of Notices 

of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel 

or parties who are not authorized to receive electronic Notices of Electronic Filing. 

/s/ Dana J. McElroy

Dana J. McElroy

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION MONTANA SUPREME COURT P.O. Box 203003 He le na, MT 5 9620 - 3003 406 -444 - 3858 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA TANNER DAVID ALFORD, Cause No . DA 24 - 0250 **ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR**  **EXTENSION** Appellant/Defendant,

- vs STATE OF MONTANA,

Appellee/Plaintiff. UPON motion from

the Appellant, with good cause appearing therefor, and with no objection from the Appellee, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant’s motion for an extension of time within which to file his opening brief in the above - captioned cause of action is GRANTED. Appellant shall have until July 1, 2024, to file his opening brief. ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BY THE COURT

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0250
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2007, I,
Michael Moulton, Chief Financial Officer of Epic Bancorp, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp
  for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the
  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and,                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | the information contained in such Annual Report on
  Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2007,
  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
  results of operations of Epic Bancorp.

|                      |                                                                           
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 25, 2008 | /s/ MICHAEL MOULTON                                                       
|                      |                                                                           
|                      | Michael Moulton
  Chief Financial Officer 
  (Principal Financial Officer)

---
§ 183.201 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to monohull outboard boats that are: ( 1 ) Less than 20 feet in length; and
( 2 ) Rated for outboard engines of more than 2 horsepower.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to sailboats, canoes, kayaks, inflatable boats, submersibles, surface effect vessels, amphibious vessels, and raceboats.
[CGD 75-168, 42 FR 20243, Apr. 18, 1977, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999]