alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wizzard Software Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB-A1 for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, President, CEO and Treasurer and John Busshaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.   Date:3/17/08By:/s/ Christopher J. SpencerChristopher J. SpencerChief Executive Officer and President   Date:3/17/08By:/s/ John BusshausJohn BusshausChief Financial Officer
Edward Roberts and Michelle Roberts American Security Insurance Company

St. Lucie County

Luis Pimentel, Kanner & Pintaluga, P.A., 925 S. Federal Highway, 6th

Floor, Boca Raton, Florida 33432; 561.424.0032

Brian H. Koch and Adriana Pavon, Holland & Knight LLP; 515 E.

Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301;

954 468 7984•

•

•

•

•

•

• •

28 USC Section 1332 - There is complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiffs and Defendant.

3

98,000.00

•

August 26, 2022

Save As... Print Reset

Case 2:22-cv-14302-AMC Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 1 of 1
Hillsborough

No. 78-191

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Victor W. Dysart

October 30, 1978

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general, and *Anne E. Cagwin,*assistant attorney general *{Deborah J. Cooper*orally), for the State.

*Richard G. Smith,*of Jaffrey, filed no brief.

Memorandum

Defendant was found to be a habitual motor vehicle offender following a hearing before the Hillsborough County Superior Court. The trial court ordered defendant not to operate a motor vehicle for six months from the date of its order. This order was later amended to provide for a twelve-month revocation. The State seasonably excepted to the court’s order and the matter was transferred here by *Loughlin,*C.J.

RSA 262-B:5 IV provides that following a finding that a person is a habitual offender the court shall direct the person not to operate a motor vehicle. The period of revocation is governed by RSA 262-B:6 which requires a mandatory lapse of at least four years from the effective date of the order before a person may petition for restoration of his privilege to operate. RSA 262-B:8. Restoration of this privilege is an administrative function required by statute and not one involving judicial discretion, such as suspension of a fine or other sentence. *See State v. Greenwood,*115 N.H. 117, 119, 335 A.2d 644, 646 (1975).

*Exception sustained; order vacated, remanded.*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4895 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4895

 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase the maximum amount 
     of marketing loan gains and loan deficiency payments that an 
agricultural producer may receive during each of crop years 2000, 2001, 
                               and 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2000

Mrs. Emerson (for herself and Mr. Berry) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase the maximum amount 
     of marketing loan gains and loan deficiency payments that an 
agricultural producer may receive during each of crop years 2000, 2001, 
                               and 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED AMOUNT OF MARKETING LOAN GAINS AND 
              LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS.

    Section 1001(2) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. 1308(2)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``However, 
during each of crop years 2000, 2001, and 2002, the total amount of 
such payments may not exceed $150,000 per person.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Bowman’s Ex’rs. *vs*Wootton and wife.

Motion.

*Case*20.

Error to the Spencer County Court.

*Executors. County Courts.*

Case stated.

"When the testator directs that his executors be permitted to qualify without giving security, can the County Court, at the instance of a legatee or devisee, require the executors to give such security or surrender the estate ? — Quere.

If they cando so, it can only be done upon showing that the ex-ecutorswere less responsible than when the will, was proved.

*December*16.

Judge Breck

deliveteithe opinion of the Court.

Stilwell and Lackey, upon the probate of the will of Charles Bowman, deceased, in the Spencer County-Court, in February, 1845, were qualified as executors, and as the will directed that they should not be required to give security, none was required or given. In September following, it appears that they delivered over to the widow of the testator, and devisee for life, all the estate which had come to their hands.

In December, 1846, the Court, on motion of Wootton and wife, the latter being a devisee in remainder, and to whom, (the testator having been her guardian,) his estate was indebted, directed a summons to issue against the executors, requiring them to appear and show cause why they should not be ruled to give bond and security. They appeared, and being ruled to give security as executors, and having failed and refused to comply, an order was made removing them, and the Sheriff of the county was directed to take the estate of the testator into his possession and administer it according to law.

To reverse that order, the executors prosecute this writ of error.

It is contended the order ought to be. reversed upon two grounds:

1st. That the Court had no power to make the removal.

2d. That it was wholly unauthorized by the proof in the cause.

Upon the first ground, we find no express statutory provision authorizing this proceeding, and we are not satisfied the authority for i.t can be fairly inferred or implied.

*68
      *McHenry*for plaintiffs.

But if wrong upon this question, and the power upon a proper case made out be conceded, still we are of opinion the facts in this case did not justify the requisition for security. It does not appear that the executors were not entirely solvent and responsible, or that they were less so than at the date or probate of the will. Nor is it shown, in our opinion, that security was required for the protection of the creditor or devisee in. remainder; and certainly not for the protection of the Court.

The judgment or order, is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the motion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of RTI Biologics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and
for, the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2010



/s/ Thomas F. RoseName:

Thomas F. RoseTitle:

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
RTI Biologics, Inc. and will be retained by RTI Biologics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Genio Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Steven A. Horowitz,
CEO and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ Steven A. Horowitz
                                      ----------------------
                                      Steven A. Horowitz CEO, CFO,
                                      principal executive officer,
                                      principal financial and accounting officer
                                      January 16, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

## Public Com **ments Received for The Campus Safety and Security Survey**  **201 5**  **- 201**  **7 During the 6**  **0 -**  **day Comment Period and OPE**  **Responses Docket:**  ED - 2014 - ICCD - 0153 - 0053 

### Comment On: FR Doc # 2014 -28094 **Technical	Changes Document:**  ED -2014 - ICCD - 0153 - 0053 **Name:** Michelle Elizer **Date Posted:** 1 /27/15 On page 30 of the survey document, there is a display area where the institution must fill in the number of domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking incidents that are reported by the local police department. B elow the primary header, there is supplemental text instructions stating total occurrences reported to police. There is a minor change in wording from the primary header to the supplemental text. The phrase reported by the local police changing to reported to police immediately below the header is confusing. Based on the regulations, I believe the intent of this field is to include total occurrences reported by the local police. I recommend changing the supplemental text to state, Total occurrences reported by police [included attachments containing screenshots of page 30]. **RESPONSE:** Dear Ms. Elizer , Thank you for your comment submitted during the 60 - day public review process, responding to a request for comments on Campus Safety and Security Survey , which was published by the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) in the Federal Register. The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) provides an opportunity for an open and public comment period where comments on collections can be made. We agree that the discrepancy you pointed out was confusing, and we have made the changes you suggested to the Campus Safety and Security Survey. Sincerely, 

### Gail McLarnon Senior Director, Policy Development, Analysis, & Accreditation Service Office of Postsecondary

Education
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61582-CIV-SINGHAL

HEATHER LEE MINOR, individually

and on behalf of all other similarly

situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

INSURANCE LINE ONE LLC,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by 

Plaintiff (DE [12]). The Court having reviewed the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and the 

docket, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

as to Plaintiff’s individual claims and without prejudice as to any other member of the 

putative class’s right to bring claims, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and 

costs. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and any pending motions are DENIED

as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 18th day of 

October 2022.

Copies to counsel of record via CM/ECF

Case 0:22-cv-61582-AHS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN 

MCAMI

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

DIVISION 

 CASE NO. 1:22-cv-22858-KMM

LUIS ANTONIO QUINONES GARCIA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AH ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and 

!LIANES RUIZ,

Defendants. 

________________/ 

UNSWORN STATEMEN 

I, LUIS ANTONIO QUINONES GARCIA, a resident and citizen of Carolina, 

Puerto Rico and Plaintiff in this present case filed against AH ENTERTAINMENT, INC. 

(d/b/a Flow la Movie), a Florida Corporation, and !LIANES RUIZ, Florida resident do 

hereby certify that: 

1. My name and personal circumstances are as described above.

2. I have read and verify the Motion for Preliminary Injunction in its entirety

and wholly approve of its content.

3. I also verify that, to the best of my knowledge and recollection, the factual

allegations made in the complaint are true and correct.

28 U.S. Code§ 1746 - Unswom declarations under penalty of perjury: 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct, and that the present instrument was executed on September 7, 

2022. 

:tuis Antonio Quinones Garcia 

Case 1:22-cv-22858-KMM Document 4-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31(b)1**

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Charles D. McCrary, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 7, 2007

/s/Charles D. McCrary

Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 127.301 Persons in charge of shoreside transfer operations: Qualifications and certification. ( a ) No person may serve, and the operator of the waterfront facility handling LNG may not use the services of any person, as a person in charge of shoreside transfer operations, unless that person— ( 1 ) Has at least 48 hours of LNG transfer experience;
( 2 ) Knows the hazards of LNG;
( 3 ) Knows the rules of this subpart; and
( 4 ) Knows the procedures in the examined *Operations Manual* and the examined *Emergency Manual.*
( b ) Before a person in charge of shoreside transfer operations supervises a transfer, the operator must certify in writing that the criteria in paragraph (a) of this section are met. The operator must maintain a copy of each current certification available for inspection at the waterfront facility handling LNG.
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995; 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
OSBP Home

# Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP)

      - FAQs
      - Contact
      - Extranet
      - Site Map

      - Home
      - About
      -          - Leadership
        - Plans & Performance
        - Contact 
      - *for* Small Businesses
      -          - Doing Business with the DoD
        - Programs
        - Initiatives
        - Opportunities
        - Training
        - Conferences & Events
        - FAQs 
      - *for* Small Business Specialists
      -          - Regulations
        - e-SRS
        - Executive Orders
        - Regional Councils
        - Legislation
        - Policy Directives
        - Resources
        - Conferences & Events 
      - *for* Government
      -          - Strategic Plan [PDF]
        - Program Goals & Performance
        - MaxPrac Opportunity Analysis 
      - DoD Small Business Offices
      -          - Army Small Business Programs
        - Navy Small Business Programs
        - Air Force Small Business Programs
        - Other Defense Agencies Small Business Program Offices 

        - Home
        - »
        - Small Business and the DoD
        - »
        - Doing Business with the DoD
        - »
        - Small Business Specialists

        - Small Business
        - Doing Businesswith the DoD
        - Programs
        - Initiatives
        - Opportunities
        - Training
        - Conferences & Events
        - FAQs

## Small Business Specialists

The Military Services and some Defense Agencies have small business specialists at each of their procurement and contract management offices to assist small businesses, including veteran-owned, service-disabled veteran-owned, HUBZone, small disadvantaged, and women-owned small business concerns in marketing their products and services with the DoD. Among other services, these specialists provide information and guidance on:
        - Defense procurement procedures
        - How to be placed on the solicitation mailing lists
        - How to identify prime contract and subcontract opportunities

The Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Logistics Agency maintain the names of Small Business Specialists associated with their organizations. Links to these websites are below.
        - Army 
        - Navy 
        - Air Force 
        - Other Defense Agencies (ODAs)

**Disclaimer for External Links**—The appearance of external hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the United States Department of Defense of the linked web sites, or the information, products or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) sites, the United States Department of Defense does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations.
    - Home
    - About
    - *for* Small Business
    - *for* Small Business Specialists
    - *for* Government
    - Site Map
    - Extranet

© 2012 Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP). Security & Privacy Disclosure