alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 151.1515 Ballast water management alternatives under extraordinary conditions. ( a ) As long as ballast water exchange (BWE) remains an option under the schedule in § 151.1512(b) of this subpart, the master of any vessel subject to this subpart who uses BWE to meet the requirements of this subpart and, due to weather, equipment failure, or other extraordinary conditions, is unable to effect a BWE before entering the Exclusive Economic Zone, and intends to discharge ballast water into the waters of the United States, must request permission from the Captain of the Port (COTP) to exchange the vessel's ballast water within an area agreed to by the COTP at the time of the request and then discharge the vessel's ballast water within that designated area.
( b ) Once BWE is no longer an option under the schedule in § 151.1512(b) of this subpart, if the ballast water management system required by this subpart stops operating properly during a voyage or the vessel's BWM method is unexpectedly unavailable, the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of the vessel must ensure that the problem is reported to the COTP as soon as practicable. The vessel may continue to the next port of call, subject to the directions of the COTP or the Ninth District Commander, as provided by 33 CFR part 160.
[USCG-2001-10486, 77 FR 17306, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 33970, June 8, 2012]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PAYCARGO FINANCE LP,

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-22707-KMW

Plaintiff,

vs.

ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant,

and 

BAY MARITIMES INC.,

Nominal Defendant.

/

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A 

CONTINUANCE

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon PayCargo Finance LP’s Unopposed 

Motion for a Continuance (the “Motion”), and the Court having reviewed the Motion and being 

otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. The trial currently scheduled for November 20, 2023 is hereby CONTINUED.

3. The Court will hold a status conference on February ____, 2024.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida this ____day of __________, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to all counsel of record via CM/ECF

Case 1:22-cv-22707-KMW Document 72-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2023 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (244)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,485
<PP&E>                                          64,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,759)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,556
<BONDS>                                          8,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           422
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,933
<SALES>                                      1,290,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,290,470
<CGS>                                        1,282,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,286,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73


</TABLE>
#### § 20.1209 Appeals of ALJs' decisions.

Any party may appeal the ALJ's decision as provided in subpart J.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.26 – Authority to Settle","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BSmUq9pPn7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch26\/\">Ch.26 – Authority to Settle<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch26\/embed\/#?secret=BSmUq9pPn7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.26 – Authority to Settle” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"BSmUq9pPn7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 334.782 SUPSHIP Gulf Coast, Pascagoula, Mississippi, Detachment Mobile, Alabama at AUSTAL, USA, Mobile, Alabama; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area would encompass all navigable waters of the United States, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, contiguous to the area identified as AUSTAL, USA and the mean high water level within a rectangular shaped area on the east side of the Mobile River beginning at latitude 30°41′36.46′′, longitude—88°2′2.70′′; thence westerly to latitude 30°41′35.85′′, longitude—88°2′′; 5.12′′; thence southerly to latitude 30°41′26.67′′, longitude—88°2′3.62′′; thence easterly to latitude 30°41′26.98′′, longitude—88°2′1.81′′ ; thence northerly along the easterly shoreline to the point of origin.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) All persons, swimmers, vessels and other craft, except those vessels under the supervision or contract to local military or Naval authority, vessels of the U.S. Coast Guard and local or State law enforcement vessels are prohibited from entering the restricted area without permission from the Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair, USN, Gulf Coast, Pascagoula, Mississippi or his/her authorized representative.
( 2 ) The restricted area is in effect twenty four hours per day and seven days a week.
( 3 ) Should warranted access into the restricted navigation area be needed, all entities are to contact the Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair, USN, Gulf Coast, Pascagoula, Mississippi, or his/her authorized representative on Marine Communication Channel 16.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulation in this section shall be enforced by the Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair, USN, Gulf Coast, Pascagoula, Mississippi, and/or such agencies or persons as he/she may designate.
[74 FR 48152, Sept. 22, 2009, as amended at 77 FR 42653, July 20, 2012]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GREGORY ALLEN MILTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:00-cv-00031-SGW-GC; 5:95-cr-70074-SGW-1) Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Allen Milton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gregory A. Milton seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substa ntial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Milton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 209.300 Flood control regulations. ( a ) Regulations for the operation and maintenance of local flood protection works approved by the Secretary of the Army under the authority contained in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, are codified as § 208.10 of this chapter. These regulations cover conditions normally and regularly required. Whenever the regulations are not sufficiently broad to cover the specific maintenance and operation requirements of a particular project, District Engineers will submit through the Division Engineers recommended additional regulations needed for that particular project. Such supplemental regulations will require approval of the Secretary of the Army and will be made applicable only to the individual project concerned. Local interests will be advised of the approved regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood protection works at the time assurances of local cooperation are requested. District Engineers will keep informed as to the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operation and maintenance through regular, periodic inspection of the projects concerned and through careful analysis of the semiannual reports which the operating and maintaining agencies are required to submit in accordance with the regulations. The District Engineer's views as to any measures required to conform to the approved regulations will be furnished to the agencies responsible. In any case where the District Engineer has been unable to arrange satisfactory compliance or where there is question or disagreement as to the measures required for compliance, a report of the circumstances, together with the recommendations of the District and Division Engineers, will be submitted to the Chief of Engineers for consideration.
( b ) Regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control or navigation at reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds provided on the basis of such purposes, are contained in § 208.16 *et seq.* of this chapter.
Exhibit 32(g)
                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern
Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)           such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for
              the quarter ended March 31, 2004, which this statement
              accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
              Southern Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
              fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
              and results of operations of Southern Power Company.



                              /s/William P. Bowers
                                William P. Bowers
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                              /s/Cliff S. Thrasher
                                Cliff S. Thrasher
                     Senior Vice President, Comptroller and
                             Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 6, 2004
#### § 187.303 Applicability.

Subject to a savings clause provided under state law, this subpart applies to any transaction, certificate of title, or record relating to a vessel, even if the transaction, certificate of title, or record was entered into or created before the effective date of the State law.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Pre-Dispute ADR

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Pre-Dispute ADR Pre-Dispute ADRADR2022-02-17T18:00:55-05:00
			
			Pre-Dispute ADRThe parties to a civilian agency contract may ask the CBCA for ADR assistance any time there is an issue in dispute, from pre-claim, through the early appeal process, to post-hearing.  It is important to note that the later that ADR is requested, the more costs are incurred and the more entrenched the parties’ positions become.  ADR procedures can also be used for the entire dispute or just parts of it, as the parties agree.
Upon request, the Board will make a judge neutral available for an ADR proceeding, even if a contracting officer’s decision has not been issued.  To initiate an ADR proceeding for all matters other than docketed CDA appeals, the parties should jointly request ADR in writing and direct such a request to the Board Chairman.  48 CFR 6101.54(a)(1). Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508