alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on August 24, 2011 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002, to hear oral argument in an appeal by Eric J. Brown, Matthew J. Collins, Kevin J. Walsh, and Mark W. Wells (collectively, “Respondents”) and a cross-appeal by the Division of Enforcement from an initial decision of an administrative law judge.

                    Brown and Walsh were formerly associated with registered broker-dealer Prime Capital Services, Inc. (“Prime Capital”), and Collins and Wells are currently associated with Prime Capital.                          ( print page 52369)    

The law judge found that, in sales of variable annuities to elderly customers, Respondents violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, and Exchange Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Rule 17a-3. The law judge also found that Collins failed to reasonably supervise Brown within the meaning of Exchange Act Sections 15(b)(4)(E) and 15(b)(6). For these violations, the law judge issued cease-and-desist orders against Respondents, ordered Respondents to disgorge commissions earned from selling certain variable annuities, barred Respondents from associating with a broker, dealer, or investment adviser, and imposed a third-tier civil monetary penalty of $130,000 against each Respondent.

Issues likely to be considered at oral argument include whether Respondents violated the above provisions and, if so, the extent to which, under the circumstances, sanctions are warranted.

For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

 Dated: August 17, 2011.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-21463 Filed 8-18-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                        National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, To Review a Program Project Grant Application.                    

*Date:*                        January 25, 2000.                    

*Time:*                        8:00 AM to 4:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        Holiday Inn—Chevy Chase, Palladian East and Center Rooms, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                        Arthur Schaerdel, Scientific Review Administrator, The Bethesda Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9666.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-1418 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres

DELIO BATISTA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on a June 27, 2023 calendar call and hearing [ECF 

No. 84]. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine [ECF No. 77] is GRANTED in part and DENIED

in part, for the reasons stated in open court.

2. This matter is set for a jury trial to begin on Monday, July 10, 2023 at 8:30 A.M. 

3. Should the parties reach a settlement before trial, they must notify the Court before

Friday, July 7, 2023 at 1:00 P.M. Failure to do so will result in the cost of the 

jury being passed onto the parties.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 27th day of June, 2023.

 ________________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 151.1024 Display of number. ( a ) The owner or operator of each vessel under this subpart must ensure that the vessel number stated on the conditional permit issued under § 151.1015 is displayed so that it— ( 1 ) Is clearly legible;
( 2 ) Has a contrasting background;
( 3 ) Is readily visible from either side of the vessel; and
( 4 ) Is in block figures that are at least 18 inches in height.
( b ) No person may tamper with or falsify a number required under this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)

          In connection with the Annual Report of DIVERSIFIED SECURITY
SOLUTIONS, INC. (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the
"Report"), we, James E. Henry, Irvin F. Witcosky and Douglas West, the Chief
Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of the company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material; respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the company.


Date: March 24, 2005                      /s/ James E. Henry
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: James E. Henry
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                          /s/ Irvin F. Witcosky
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Irvin F. Witcosky
                                          Chief Operating Officer


                                          /s/ Douglas West
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Douglas West
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 16, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *American State Bancshares, Inc.,*                     Great Bend, Kansas; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Rose Hill Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Rose Hill Bank, both in Rose Hill, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 17, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-21339 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
| (1)   | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sedona Software Solutions, Inc. for                the                year ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects, the                financial condition and results of operations of Sedona Software                Solutions, Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:          | /s/                David Clark                                                                           |   |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Name:  |  David                Clark                                                                         |
|  Title: |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  November                30, 2005                                                                   |
Presbyterian Healthcare Services

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for addressing behavioral health 

and/or chronic pain among older adults 

and adults with disabilities living in your 

community.

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based selfmanagement education (CDSME) and/or 

self-management support programs to 

empower them to better manage these 

chronic condition(s), while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

The Presbyterian Healthcare Services and its 

partners will: 

• Extend use of call-center referral system, 

the Wellness Referral Center (WRC), to 

new counties and incorporate chronic 

pain as a diagnosed disability; 

• Support program capacity, service 

quality, and fidelity through site visits, 

marketing, and training;

• Through culturally and linguistically 

appropriate programming, deliver four 

chronic disease self-management 

education models (eight language 

variants) through virtual and phone 

implementation; and

• Increase and expand outreach and 

marketing to organizations serving those 

60+, especially in Sandoval and Valencia 

counties.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program 

• Diabetes Self-Management Program 

• Chronic Pain Self-Management Program

• Cancer – Thriving & Surviving

• Tomando Control de su Salud

• Programa de Manejo Personal de la 

Diabetes

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, Presbyterian 

Healthcare Services will collaborate with the 

following key partners:

• Adelante

• Area agencies on aging

• Bernalillo County Community Health 

Council
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

• Comagine

• First Choice

• New Mexico Chronic Disease Prevention 

Council

• State Unit on Aging

Anticipated Results 

The Presbyterian Healthcare Services and its 

partners propose to achieve the following results: 

• Older adults will have greater access to 

programs to self-manage chronic pain 

and disease;

• Communities will increase the number 

and integration of services addressing 

negative social determinants of health;

and

• Health care professionals will 

demonstrably increase referrals

connecting older adults with services.

Contact:

Valerie Quintana

Presbyterian Healthcare Services

vquintana2@phs.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
Cheshire

No. 7482

#### Wayne F. Willett v. Margaret T. Willett

December 30, 1976

*Arthur Olson, Jr.,*by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*830
      *Peter S. Espiefs,*by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Per curiam.

In this petition for custody, the issues raised by the defendant involve the jurisdiction of the superior court, whether an Arizona decree is entitled to full faith and credit, and whether the decree of the court awarding custody to the plaintiff is against the weight of the evidence.

The parties were married in Keene, New Hampshire, on December 2, 1967. Two children were born of the marriage who are now six and eight years old. The family moved to Arizona in April 1973, hoping to solve marital problems which were developing. In December, Wayne came to New Hampshire for a vacation.

Before he went back to Arizona, defendant informed him she wanted a divorce. After plaintiff returned to Arizona, the parties separated, the children going with the plaintiff. He thereafter sent them, along with a baby sitter, to Keene by air and he followed in his truck on about January 6, 1975. Margaret started divorce proceedings in Arizona and Wayne was served in New Hampshire by registered mail on January 21, 1975. He defaulted in that action and the Arizona court decreed custody of both children to the mother and a divorce on no-fault grounds on May 19, 1975.

In the meantime, Wayne filed the present petition for custody and the matter was referred to the probation department for investigation on March 28, 1975. Margaret, through counsel, filed a special appearance alleging no jurisdiction and that full faith and credit should be given to her Arizona decree. The trial court ruled that due to the expense of travel, she could contest both jurisdiction and the merits without waiving the special appearance. After hearing, the court awarded custody to the father. Defendant’s exceptions were transferred by *Loughlin,*J.

It appears to us that the court had jurisdiction to award custody under RSA 460:17 (Supp. 1975), : 18-21. At the time of the decree which is dated December 4, 1975, Wayne had been domiciled in this State for more than six months and the children were within the jurisdiction of the court. *Potter v. Rosas,*111 N.H. 169, 276 A.2d 922 (1971).

We also hold that full faith and credit was not required to be given to the Arizona decree awarding custody of the children to Margaret. The children were not in Arizona at the time of the decree, Wayne was not served with process there and did not appear, and the divorce was for the no-fault cause that the marriage *831was “irretrievably broken.” *May v. Anderson,*345 U.S. 528 (1953).

Defendant argues that the award of custody to plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence. A review of the evidence, which included a probation department report, reveals that the decree was within the broad discretion of the trial court in such matters. *Mangin v. Mangin,*115 N.H. 489, 343 A.2d 636 (1975).

*Exceptions overruled.*

Bois, J., did not sit.
#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Puryear.

Bumpkin, J.

1. Whether or not a train slackened speed a.t a given point where stock was injured, and, if so, to what extent, being in conflict, evidence that it was behind time was admissible to show that there was a reason or motive for not stopping, or for making rapid speed. *Killian*v. *Georgia R. Co.,*97 *Ga.*727.

*89Submitted July 18,

Decided December 12, 1906.-

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Whitfield superior •court. November 17, 1905.

*Shumate & Maddox,*for plaintiff in error.

*George G. Glenn*and *M. G. Tarver,*contra.

:2. There being some eoniliet in the evidence on material points, and enough evidence to authorize the verdict, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial, although the evidence of the agents on defendant’s engine which killed the plaintiff’s mules, if taken alone, may have made out a complete defense. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Jvistices concur.*
ACCEPTED07-15-00012-CRSEVENTH COURT OF APPEALSAMARILLO, TEXAS6/10/2015 3:14:31 PMVivian Long, Clerk
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00591-CR

Rick Renfro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BURNET COUNTY

NO. M24975, HONORABLE W. R. SAVAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Rick Renfro filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for failure to wear a seat belt.

The county court assessed a $50 fine and $216 in court costs. Proceeding pro se, Renfro failed to

pay or make arrangements to pay the $19 fee requested for preparation of the record, claiming that

he was indigent. After a hearing, the trial court determined that Renfro is not indigent. No record

of the trial on the merits has been filed, and there is no indication that Renfro has paid, made

arrangements to pay, or intends to pay for the record of the trial on the merits. Renfro stated in a

letter file-stamped by this Court on March 22, 2010, that he is “unable to pay for the records.”

By order dated April 9, 2010, this Court informed Renfro that he could file a brief on

or before May 14, 2010, challenging the determination that he is not indigent. The April 9 order

cautioned that, if Renfro failed to file a brief challenging the indigency determination, this appeal
would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No brief challenging the

indigency determination has been filed. No record on the merits determination has been filed.

This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 18, 2010

Do Not Publish

2
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00003-CV

IN RE JASON HEUER AND CLORISSA HEUER

Original Proceeding

From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-3858-3

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jason Heuer’s and Clorissa Heuer’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is denied. 

The Heuers’ “Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Mandamus” and “First Supplemental 

Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Mandamus” are dismissed as moot.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 21, 2022

[OT06]