alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Crim. No. 1964.

First Appellate District, Division One.

June 14, 1937.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of GEORGE R. ANDERSEN on Behalf of ELAINE BLACK for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

*360George R. Andersen for Petitioner.

Matthew Brady, District Attorney, and Robert E. Burns, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

A petition for a writ of *habeas corpus.*Elaine Black, on whose behalf the petition was filed, and who will be hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, was charged in the Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco with the violation of an ordinance of the municipality. Upon her trial she was sworn as a witness on her own behalf. On cross-examination the district attorney inquired as to the place of her residence but she declined to answer. Being directed by the court to answer the question she persisted in her refusal and was committed for contempt.

Although a witness may not be impeached by evidence of particular wrongful acts (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 2051), and cannot be compelled to give an answer which will have a direct tendency to degrade her character (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 2065), here the question was relevant, contained nothing which would tend to violate her statutory privilege, and the inquiry was proper on cross-examination. *(Alford*v. *United States,*282 U. S. 687 [51 Sup. Ct. 218, 75 L. Ed. 624] ; *Sawyear*v. *United States,*27 Fed. (2d) 569; 70 Cor. Jur., Witnesses, sec. 1093, p. 873.)

Petitioner contends, however, that the order of commitment, in which were set forth the circumstances and the question asked, failed to allege that the inquiry was material to the matter before the court.

That the question was proper and material on cross-examination is obvious, and an express allegation to that effect would have added nothing to the court’s order.

The writ is accordingly discharged and the petitioner remanded.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-14308-CIV-CANNON/McCabe

REDUS EL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

POINTE WEST MASTER PROPERTY 

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 11]

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Magistrate Judge McCabe’s Report and 

Recommendation on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, for a More Definite 

Statement (the “Report”) [ECF No. 11]. On October 25, 2022, Defendant filed a Motion to 

Dismiss, or Alternatively, for a More Definite Statement (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 6]. On 

December 14, 2022, following referral, Magistrate Judge McCabe issued a Report recommending 

denial of the Motion [ECF No. 11 pp. 1, 5]. Objections to the Report were due on December 28, 

2022 [ECF No. 11 p. 5]. No party filed objections, and the time to do so has expired [ECF No. 11 

p. 5].

To challenge the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, a party must file 

specific written objections identifying the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation 

to which objection is made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Heath v. Jones, 863 F.2d 815, 822 

(11th Cir. 1989); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). A district court 

reviews de novo those portions of the report to which objection is made and may accept, reject, 

or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 

Case 2:22-cv-14308-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-14308-CIV-CANNON/McCabe

2

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To the extent a party fails to object to parts of the magistrate judge’s report, 

the Court may accept the recommendation so long as there is no clear error on the face of the 

record. Macort, 208 F. App’x at 784. Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo, even in the absence 

of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App’x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010); Cooper-Houston 

v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

Following de novo review, the Court finds the Report to be well reasoned and correct. For 

the reasons set forth in the Report [ECF No. 11 pp. 2–5], it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 11] is ACCEPTED.

2. The Motion [ECF No. 6] is DENIED.

3. On or before January 16, 2023, Defendant shall file an answer to the Complaint 

[ECF No. 1]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 30th day of December

2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 2:22-cv-14308-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-35756 of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. onForm S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-101957 of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 7, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December31, 2002. 

 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

 

Orlando, Florida 

February 7, 2003
#### § 179.17 Penalties.

Each manufacturer who fails to comply with a provision of 46 U.S.C. 4310 or the regulations in this part, is subject to the penalties as prescribed in 46 U.S.C. 4311.

[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996]
**Exhibit 32(d)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gulf Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Susan N. Story

Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Ronnie R. Labrato

Ronnie R. Labrato

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                       |

 

 

Date:  August 6, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4806 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4806

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 1710 Alabama Avenue in 
       Jasper, Alabama, as the ``Carl Elliott Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1710 Alabama Avenue in Jasper, 
Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ``Carl Elliott Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carl Elliott 
Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1712 Safety Zones; Annual Independence Day Firework Displays, Skagway, Haines, and Wrangell, AK. ( a ) *Regulated areas.* The following areas are permanent safety zones: ( 1 ) All navigable waters of Taiya Inlet within a 300-yard radius of the fireworks launching point located on the White Pass and Yukon Railway Dock at approximate position 59°26.70′ N, 135°19.58′ W in the vicinity of the mouth of the Small Boat Harbor, Skagway, Alaska;
( 2 ) All navigable waters of Portage Cove, Haines, AK within a 300-yard radius around the fireworks launch area, centered at approximate position 59°14′16.72′′ N, 135°25′35.79′′ W;
( 3 ) all navigable waters of Wrangell Harbor within a 300-yard radius of the fireworks launch platform centered at approximate position 56°28.223′ N and 132°23.285′ W.
( b ) *Effective date.* This rule is effective from 10 p.m. until 2:30 a.m., July 3 through July 5, of each year.
( c ) *Definitions.* The following definitions apply to this section: Designated Representative—a “designated representative” is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, to act on his or her behalf.
( d ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as the following regulations, apply.
( 2 ) No vessels, except for fireworks barge and accompanying vessels, will be allowed to transit the safety zones without the permission of the COTP or the designated representative.
( 3 ) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within any of the regulated areas shall contact the COTP or the designated representative via VHF channel 16 or 907-463-2990 (Sector Southeast Alaska command center) to obtain permission to do so.
[USCG-2013-0078, 78 FR 38202, June 26, 2013, as amended by USCG-2023-0811, 88 FR 69036, Oct. 5, 2023]
#### § 3.45-15 Sector Lake Michigan Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Lake Michigan's office is located in Milwaukee, WI. The boundaries of Sector Lake Michigan's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone include all navigable waters of the United States and contiguous land areas within the boundaries of an area starting from a point at latitude 44°43′00′′ N, longitude 84°30′00′′ W, proceeding due west to longitude 85°40′00′′ W; thence northwest to the eastern shore of Lake Michigan at latitude 45°01′00′′ N; thence northwest to latitude 45°22′30′′ N, longitude 86°19′00′′ W; thence northeast to latitude 45°41′00′′ N, longitude 86°06′00′′ W; thence northwest to latitude 46°20′00′′ N, longitude 87°22′00′′ W; thence west to latitude 46°20′00′′ N, longitude 90°00′00′′ W; thence south to latitude 41°00′00′′ N; thence east to the Ohio-Indiana border at latitude 41°00′00′′ N, longitude 84°48′12′′ W; thence north along the Ohio-Indiana border to the intersection of the Ohio-Indiana-Michigan border at latitude 41°41′59′′ N, longitude 84°48′22′′ W; thence east along the Ohio-Michigan border to latitude 41°42′13′′ N, longitude 84°30′00′′ W; thence north to the start point.

[USCG-2009-0929, 76 FR 13510, Mar. 14, 2011]
###### Editorial Note on Part 165

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

#### § 165.1121 [Reserved]
#### § 181.701 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all personal flotation devices that are sold or offered for sale for use on recreational boats.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACCEL INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 200
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            13,882
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  15,597
<CASH>                                             657
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              59
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,899
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 51,543
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              1,782
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  4,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,328
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,206)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,899
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,095
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                291
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (239)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,934
<BENEFITS>                                         912
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        221
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (813)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (172)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  59,421
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                799
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               16,576
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 146
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 2,792
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 51,543
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             58


</TABLE>
Unassociated Document


 


GENERAL RELEASE







Preliminary Statement







Dionics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Dionics”), has entered into a Share Exchange Agreement dated as of January 30, 2012, as amended (the “Share Exchange Agreement”), with Shangrao Bai Hua Zhou Industrial Co., Ltd. (“Shangrao”), and Xiao Ling Li (“Li”) pursuant to which it has agreed to transfer approximately 95% of the equity interests in Dionics to Li and others in exchange for all of the equity interests in Bai Hua Zhou Green Resources (China) Investment Group Limited, a company organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. Bernard L. Kravitz (“Kravitz”) is the President and a principal shareholder of Dionics.







As a condition to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement, Kravitz is required to deliver this general release in favor of Dionics.







***


BE IT KNOWN, that Bernard L. Kravitz (hereinafter referred to as "Releasor"), for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) Dollar, and other valuable consideration received from or on behalf of Dionics (hereinafter referred to as the “Releasee”), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release, acquit, satisfy, and forever discharge Releasee of and from all manner of actions, causes of action, suits, debts, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, claims and demands whatsoever, which said Releasor ever had, now has, or which any personal representative, successor, heir or assign of said Releasor, hereafter can, shall or may have, against said Releasee, its successors and assigns, arising under or in respect of any contract, action, failure to act, matter or claim occurring on or prior to the date hereof, including without limitation, (i) any obligation to purchase shares of Dionics upon the failure of Central Mega Limited to purchase such shares in accordance with the Put Option contained in the agreement entered into on October 30, 2009, (ii) any promissory note, employment agreement or deferred compensation agreement between Releasor and Dionics, and (iii) the agreement between Releasor and Dionics with respect to his right to serve as or otherwise designate any individual to the Board of Dionics.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has executed this Release as of June 29, 2012.









	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 /s/ Bernard L. Kravitz	 
	 	 	
Bernard L. Kravitz
### EAARL topography - George Washington Birthplace National Monument 2008

By: John Brock**Amar NayegandhiC. Wayne WrightSara StevensXan Yates

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds401

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.820 Security Zone; Ohio River Mile, 34.6 to 35.1, Shippingport, Pennsylvania. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: The waters of the Ohio River, extending 200 feet from the shoreline of the left descending bank beginning from mile marker 34.6 and ending at mile marker 35.1.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, MSU Pittsburgh.
( 2 ) Persons and vessels desiring to transit the area of the security zone may contact the Captain of the Port, MSU Pittsburgh at telephone number 412-644-5808 or on VHF channel 16 to seek permission to transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port, MSU Pittsburgh or his designated representative.
( c ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
[COTP Pittsburgh-02-005, 67 FR 40163, June 12, 2002, as amended by USCG-2018-0533, 85 FR 8173, Feb. 13, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-804]


Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Postponement 
of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: August 22, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael A. Romani at (202) 482-0198, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Postponement of Preliminary Determination

    On April 27, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated the antidumping duty investigation on nails from the United 
Arab Emirates. See Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: 
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 76 FR 23559 (April 27, 
2011). The notice of initiation stated that the Department would issue 
its preliminary determination for this investigation no later than 140 
days after the issuance of the initiation in accordance with section 
733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 
CFR 351.205(b)(1) unless postponed.
    On August 8, 2011, Mid Continent Nail Corporation (the petitioner) 
made a timely request pursuant to section 733(c)(1) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.205(b)(2) and (e) for postponement of the preliminary 
determination in this investigation. The petitioner requested a 50-day 
postponement of the preliminary determination in order to allow the 
Department additional time to resolve a number of complex issues in 
this investigation.
    The petitioner submitted a request for postponement of the 
preliminary determination more than 25 days before the scheduled date 
of the preliminary determination. See 19 CFR 351.205(e). Therefore, 
because the petitioner provided reasons for its request and the 
Department finds no compelling reasons to deny the request, the 
Department is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination 
in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.205(b)(2) and (e) by 50 days to October 27, 2011. The deadline for 
the final determination will continue to be 75 days after the date of 
the preliminary determination unless extended.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).

    Dated: August 15, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-21387 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 126.16 Conditions for designating a “facility of particular hazard.” ( a ) *Basic requirements.* The facility shall comply with all the conditions in § 126.15 except where specifically waived by § 126.11.
( b ) *Warning alarms.* Warning alarms shall be installed at the waterside of such a facility to warn approaching or transiting water traffic of immediate danger in the event of fire or cargo release. Warning alarms shall be of the siren type, or the emergency rotating flashing light type, and be of sufficient intensity to be heard, or seen, a distance of 1 mile during normal facility working conditions. The alarm signal shall not conflict with local municipal prescription.
[CGFR 67-93, 32 FR 20774, Dec. 23, 1967]
Order entered November 5, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00800-CV

SUSAN E. HARRIMAN, Appellant

V.

MILDRED V. EHRENBERG, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11994

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 1, 2018 motion for an extension of time to file 

a reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 8, 2018.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
§ 175.21 Condition; size and fit; approval marking. No person may use a recreational boat unless each PFD required by § 175.15 is— ( a ) In serviceable condition as provided in § 175.23;
( b ) Of an appropriate size and fit for the intended wearer, as marked on the approval label; and
( c ) Legibly marked with its approval number, as specified in 46 CFR part 160.
[CGD 81-023, 55 FR 32034, Aug. 6, 1990, as amended by CGD93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996; USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56499, Sept. 22, 2014]