alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-15 Hearing Officer. ( a ) The Hearing Officer has no other responsibility, direct or supervisory, for the investigation of cases referred for the assessment of civil penalties. The hearing officer may take action on a case referred by any District Commander.
( b ) The Hearing Officer decides each case on the basis of the evidence before him, and must have no prior connection with the case. The Hearing Officer is solely responsible for the decision in each case referred to him.
( c ) The Hearing Officer is authorized to administer oaths and issue subpoenas necessary to the conduct of a hearing, to the extent provided by law.
[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by CGD 87-008a, 52 FR 17554, May 11, 1987; USCG-2002-12471, 67 FR 41331, June 18, 2002]
§ 174.11 Applicability of State numbering system. ( a ) Except as allowed in paragraph (c) of this section, a State numbering system must require the numbering of vessels to which § 173.11 of this chapter applies.
( b ) A State numbering system may require the numbering of any vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the State unless prohibited by the regulations in Part 173 of this chapter.
( c ) A State numbering system may exempt from its numbering requirements any vessel or class of vessels to which § 173.13 of this chapter applies.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Jesus Medina <jesus.medina@seaborneairlines.com>

Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 11:38 AM

To: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Cc: Susana Castro

Subject: Re: Petition for Exemption: Seaborne Airlines (FAA-2010-0970)

Mrs. Daniels,

Seaborne Airlines would like to withdraw the extension request for Exemption no. 10177F since we already have the

Exemption granted.  

Thanks again for your assistance,

Jesus  

On Jul 28, 2016, at 2:34 PM, "Nia.Daniels@faa.gov" <Nia.Daniels@faa.gov> wrote:

Mr. Medina,  

  

We have received your June 28, 2016 petition for exemption that would extend your exemption for 120

days. However, we have already granted Exemption No. 10177F on June 23, 2016.  

  

Can you please respond to this letter stating that you would like to withdraw this exemption request?

  

Thank you,  

  

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
§ 155.775 Maximum cargo level of oil. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, “oil” has the same meaning as provided in § 151.05 of this chapter.
( b ) A cargo tank on a tank vessel may not be filled with oil higher than— ( 1 ) 98.5 percent of the cargo tank volume; or
( 2 ) The level at which the overfill alarm required by § 155.480 is set.
[CGD 90-071a, 59 FR 53291, Oct. 21, 1994]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1168 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 83 ) ll-C-1 2 Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 4/29/200811:23:19AM Sheet 83 of 131P. 2 

# A-89-1 0 II-C-1 2 

## PE CI 8 198 9 Thoma s Kittlema n E.I . DuPon t d e Nemour s & Co . Engineerin g Departmen t Louvier s Buildin g Newark , D E 1971 4 

# sun n D '

i •- . r ~ -— - • • : 

## FE B 199 1 1 EPA AIRDO C

Dea r Tom : O n behal f o f you r colleague s o nth e RegulatoryNegotiatio n Committe e fo r Fugitiv e Emission s fromEquipmen t Leaks , I woul d lik e t o than k yo u fo r th e tim e and energyspen t i nmakin g arrangement s fo r ou r recen t plan t visits . W e al l kno who w complicate d arrangin g bot hth e logistica l and substantiv e detai l o f suc ha tri p ca n be ; you r concer n fo r makin g thi s tri p a worthwhil e experienc e and you r coordinatio n o f th e detail s o f th e visi t wa s outstanding . W e appreciate d th e willingnes s o f managemen t and staf f a t th e thre e plant s t o spend tim e talkin g wit hu s and showin g u s thei r eguipmen t and facilities . Th e Committe e member s appreciate d th e tim e th e DuPon t staf f spen t preparin g fo r and conductin g th e baggin g demonstratio nfo r ou r benefit . Al l o f th e member s o f th e committe e though t tha t th e visi t wa s ver y worthwhile . A s yo u know , th e visi t wa s reference d manytime s durin g committe e meetin g following th e visit ; I am sur e tha t i t wil l b e reference d agai na t futur e meetings . Sincerel yyours , Debora hS . Dalto n Executiv e Secretary RegulatoryNegotiatio n Committe e
cc : /VBobA j a x
#### SAMUEL B. WILLEY, Administrator, Plaintiff, *v.*IRA SHAVER and another, Defendants.

*Award*— *construction of.*

An appeal having been taken to the County Court from a judgment of a justice of the peace, the case was, by consent of the parties, submitted to an arbitrator, who awarded to the plaintiff’s intestate “ the sum of twenty-five dollars, and the costs, if any, recovered by her before Charles Gr. Day, justice.” *Reid,*that the plaintiff was entitled only to such costs as were owing to the deceased at the time of the award, and that as the costs had already been paid, they could not be recovered a second time upon the award.

Motion for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at the General Term, after a verdict directed by the court.

*Jerome*Rowe, for the plaintiff.

*King &*Montgomery, for the defendants.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Motion for new trial denied, and judgment ordered on verdict.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.30 Proposing an amendment to the operations manual. ( a ) The licensee may propose an amendment to the operations manual: ( 1 ) By submitting to the Sector Commander, or to the MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority, in writing, the amendment and reasons for the amendments not less than 30 days before the requested effective date of the amendment; or
( 2 ) If the amendment is needed immediately, by submitting the amendment, and reasons why the amendment is needed immediately, to the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority in writing.
( b ) The Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority must respond to a proposed amendment by notifying the licensee, in writing, before the requested date of the amendment whether the request is approved. If the request is disapproved, the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority must include the reasons for disapproval in the notice. If the request is for an immediate amendment, the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority must respond as soon as possible.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39181, July 1, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4876 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4876

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession or 
transfer of the easily concealable pistols known as ``pocket rockets''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2000

 Mr. Blagojevich introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession or 
transfer of the easily concealable pistols known as ``pocket rockets''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pocket Rocket Elimination Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF THE POSSESSION OR TRANSFER OF THE EASILY 
              CONCEALABLE PISTOLS KNOWN AS ``POCKET ROCKETS''.

    (a) In General.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(z)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or transfer 
a handgun that is--
            ``(A) capable of holding 2 or more rounds of ammunition; 
        and
            ``(B) less than 7\1/2\ inches long.
    ``(2)(A) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or 
transfer of a handgun by a person who has had title to the handgun 
continuously since before the date of the enactment of this subsection.
    ``(B) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer 
of a handgun by a law enforcement officer while acting as authorized in 
the line of duty.''.
    (b) Penalties.--Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(7) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(z) shall be fined 
under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         631,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               631,819
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 631,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     530,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   631,819
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                183,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            126,761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   126,761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 79 

Relative to the death of Representative Charles W. Norwood, Jr., of Georgia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. ISAKSON) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Representative Charles W. Norwood, 

Jr., of Georgia. 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of the Honorable Charles W. Norwood, Jr., late a Rep4 resentative from the State of Georgia. 

5 Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these reso6 lutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an 

7 enrolled copy thereof to the family of the deceased. 

8 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns or recesses 

9 today, it stand adjourned or recessed as a further mark 

10 of respect to the memory of the deceased Representative. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Government-Owned Inventions; Availability for Licensing

AGENCY:  National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, DHHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The invention listed below is owned by an agency of the U.S. 
Government and is available for licensing in the U.S. in accordance 
with 35 U.S.C. 207 to achieve expeditious commercialization of results 
of federally funded research and development.

ADDRESSES:  Licensing information and a copy of the U.S. patent 
application referenced below may be obtained by contacting J.E. Fahner-
Vihtelic at the Office of Technology Transfer, National Institutes of 
Health, 6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville, Maryland 20852-
3804; Telephone: 301/496-7735 ext. 270; Fax: 301/402-0220; E-mail; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe5e9bcb9f5cfe1e6e7a1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1bbb7e2e7ab91bfb8b9ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>. A signed Confidential Disclosure Agreement is required 
to receive a copy of any patent application.

Artificial Salivary Gland

Bruce J. Baum et al. (NIDCR)
Serial No. 60/121,335
Filed 24 Feb 1999

    The present application describes an artificial fluid secreting 
prosthetic device for non-invasive insertion and methods of using this 
device. Specifically, compositions and methods based on the discovery 
of an artificial fluid secreting prosthesis are disclosed in this 
application. Currently, there is no conventional effective treatment 
for salivary gland hypofunction. And although the transplantation of 
mammalian salivary glands has also been tried, this option has not 
proven desirable due to lack of sufficient donor supplies. To date, the 
inventors have performed experiments that have demonstrated: (1) 
Subjects having irradiated salivary gland cells can be induced to 
secrete fluid subsequent to transfer of a gene; (2) heterologous genes 
can be transferred to salivary gland cells; and (3) an artificial gland 
has been designed having a support, an attachment surface joined to the 
support, and a monolayer of allogenic cells, engineered to secrete ions 
and water unidirectionally, joined to the attachment surface.

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
Jack Spiegel, Ph.D.,
Director, Division of Technology Development and Transfer, Office of 
Technology Transfer.
[FR Doc. 00-1425 Filed 1-20-00;8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
. - - -

- -. . -

'

J-

:

U NITED STATES DISTRICT COU RT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFFLORIDA

CASENO.22-80144-CRrSmith/Ma> ard(s)(s)

UNITED STATES OFAM ERICA

M. .

JOFFSTENN W ROY PHILOSSAINT,

Defendant.

GOW RN M ENT'SW ITNESSLIST

specialAgentMicheleMcDaniel,FB1 2 --V -'-'TC'9'Z Z

W onallean - + -a.o a...# , ForensicAccountant Z

W alkiriaVancom lmmigrationServicesOfficer2,U.S.CitizenshipandlmmigrationSewices2-eu -ZAQ.- 3

Respectfullysubmitted, .

q

M ARICENZIE IA POINTE

UNITED STATESAU ORN EY

By: s/MarcOsborne

AssistantU nitedStatesAtorney

CourtID#M 500796

500S.AustralianAvenue,Suite400

W estPalm Beach,Florida33401

Te1:(561)209-1014

-marc.osborne@usdoj.gov

x

XxNx

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 201 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Martyn A. Powell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aberdeen Idaho Mining Company (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  July 30, 2003

/s/ Martyn A. Powell

Martyn A. Powell

President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       675
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1175)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (500)
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             18000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (18000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (18000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MIGHTON PRODUCTS LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

VISION INDUSTRIES GROUP, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2018-1034

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-

00792.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SCOTT DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, Tysons, VA, argued for appellant. 

 VINCENT MCGEARY, McGeary Cukor LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by 

MICHAEL CUKOR. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CLEVENGER, and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 August 7, 2018 /s/Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA,

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ AND

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC.,

REINIER CORTES, AND

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF NON-OBJECTION

Plaintiffs, Delio Batista, Carlos Lopez, Mariana Lopez, and Rafaela Valiente, notify the

Court and all parties that they do not object to the Report and Recommendation or the Amended 

Report and Recommendation [ECF Nos. 138, 139].

Dated this 7th day of November 2023.

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 140 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31(d)2**

**GULF POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Ronnie R. Labrato, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2006

/s/Ronnie R. Labrato

Ronnie R. Labrato

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer