alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Ch.20 – Other Forums

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Ch.20 – Other Forums Ch.20 – Other ForumsADR2022-02-19T09:04:38-05:00
			
			Ch.20 – Other Forums**The Postal Board of Contract Appeals (PSBCA)**
The Contract Disputes Act of 1978 specifically establishes the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals.  41 USC 7105(d).  Although the  Rules of Practice Before the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals (39 C.F.R. pt. 955) do not specifically mention the use of ADR, other Postal Service authorities encourage it.  The Postal Service regulations state that the “Postal Service supports and encourages the use of alternative dispute resolution as an effective way to understand, address, and resolve conflicts with suppliers,” and encourages such efforts “be made before the issuance of a final decision on a claim . . . .”  Consistent with this regulation,  Clause B-9: Claims and Disputes (March 2006) provides that when a claim is submitted, “the parties by mutual consent may agree to use an [ADR] process to assist in resolving the claim.”
**The GAO Contract Appeals Board (GAO CAB)**
Rule 24 of the GAO CAB Rules encourages the use of ADR.  As the rule states, “ADR with Board participation is available at the initiative of the Board or upon the joint motion of both parties. Guidelines, procedures, and requirements for implementing ADR will be prescribed by agreement of the parties and the Board.  Ordinarily, ADR will be performed by a Board member, designated by the Chairman of the Board, that is not one of the three panel members deciding the dispute.”   GAO CAB Rules, Rule 24.
**The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Board of Contract Appeals**
The Contract Disputes Act of 1978 specifically establishes the TVA’s Board of Contract Appeals.  41 USC 7105(c).  The TVA Board of Contract Appeals is comprised of an indeterminate number of attorneys who serve as board members on a part-time basis.   18 CFR 1308.21(b).  Contract disputes involving the TVA are subject to the regulations found at 18 CFR pt. 18.  These rules do not discuss the use of ADR. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.T846 Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, Ohio River, and Upper Mississippi River, Bird's Point-New Madrid Floodway. ( a ) *Location.* The temporary safety zone will encompass all navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River from mile marker (MM) 953.8 to MM 887.0, the Upper Mississippi River from MM 0.0 to MM 3.0, and the Ohio River from MM 981.5 to MM 978.5.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this temporary safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a designated representative.
( 2 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or a designated representative by radio VHF-FM Channel 16 or via phone at 502-779-5422. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or a designated representative.
( c ) *Enforcement period.* The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public of the enforcement date and times for this safety zone, as well as any emergent safety concerns that may delay the enforcement of the zone through Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/or actual notice.
[USCG-2019-0123, 84 FR 29069, June 21, 2019]
#### § 242.1 Purpose.

This part gives general instructions on the implementation of section 321 of Public Law 101-640, 74 Stat. 500 (33 U.S.C. 709a) as it applies to the use of a Fee Schedule for recovering the cost of providing Flood Plain Management Services to Federal agencies and private persons.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Voting Membership

															Home/Coalition of Federal Ombuds/Voting Membership Voting MembershipTyler Smith2022-07-11T16:18:45-04:00						**Voting Membership**
As defined in the COFO Charter, “The primary governing body of The Coalition is the voting membership, which shall be composed of Ombuds working for federal agencies who practice according to the values cited above when performing ombuds duties. If an agency has more than one Ombudsman (i.e. a sub-agency or division by subject matter or agency program), each Ombudsman (such as an associate and an assistant Ombuds) may be members of the voting membership.”
**COFO Voting Members 2020**Coalition of Federal OmbudsCOFO Annual Conference
Information
Charter
COFO Executive Committee Charter
Leadership
Coalition History
Voting Membership
Standards & Foundational Documents
Prior Conferences & Meetings
Additional Guidance
Other Ombuds & ADR Organizations
ABA Ombuds Day 2024 Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Aug 24th, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11705 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 

of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0786 .

Dear Sir or Madam;

M3 Partners Media was issued an Exemption numbered 11705 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the 

purpose aerial data collection. M3 herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an 

additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the 

Exemption.

M3 wishes to operate a Freefly Cinestar 6, 8, DJI Phantom 1,2,3,DJI Inspire, FH 450 and Yuneec Q500 

under the same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. Submitted to the below, is the Flight 

Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS 

will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption granted to M3 Partners.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another type of 

unmanned aerial vehicle, M3 respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to 

be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption.

Best,

Michael Middleton

michael@m3partnersllc.com
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   I, Alex Demitriev, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of Merilus, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period December 30, 2008 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  November 23, 2009 By: /s/ Alex Demitriev Alex Demitriev Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Merilus, Inc. and will be retained by Merilus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 4853

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1568

South Green Road in South Euclid, Ohio, as the ‘‘Arnold C. D’Amico Station’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1568 South Green Road in South Euclid, Ohio, and known as

the South Euclid Station, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Arnold C. D’Amico Station’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Arnold

C. D’Amico Station’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### Sasol North America Inc.

2201 Old Spanish Tra il Westlake Louisiana 70669 Telephone: (+1) 337 494 5140 Facsimile: (+1) 337 494 5172 www.sasolswla.com **Product Information**
**AL FOTERRA** 

**® Surfactants** General Information ALFOTERRA® Surfactants are the sodium salts of alcohol propoxy sulfates supplied as a 27% active solution. ALFOTERRA® Surfactants are a viscous pale yellow liquid at +20°C. Currently, ALFOT ERRA® Surfactants are only available in bulk and are shipped in stainless steel tank trucks or in lined and insulated rail cars. Storage ALFOTERRA® Surfactants are supplied 73% water at pH 8

- 11. Contact with inappropriate materials may result in rust or corrosion. The ideal material for storage tanks and vessels is stainless steel (Steel No. 1.4541 or 1.4571) or plastic. ALFOTERRA® Surfactants are temperature sensitive. Heating the surfactants above 40°C must be avoided, even briefly, because hydrol ysis may occur. The ideal storage temperature is +10 to +30°C. If the surfactant is stored stationary for long periods of time (> 30 days), particularly at temperatures of below + 10°C, it is possible that the product will concentrate toward the bottom of the container. It is recommended that for long

- term storage the material be maintained at +20 to +30°C, blanketed with nitrogen or other inert gas and gently mixed or recirculated. Vigorous mixing which causes air entrapment should be avoided. Produc t Stability Hydrolysis of ALFOTERRA® Surfactants is catalyzed by heat and low pH conditions. It is recommended that the pH of stored product be checked periodically. If the pH has drifted below 8, adjust with dilute caustic solution. Fully deminerali zed water, free of carbon dioxide should be used for checking the pH. Microbial Contamination Like all products with a high water content, ALFOTERRA® Surfactant is susceptible to microbial contamination and decomposition by micro

- organisms. However, mai ntaining the pH at 8

- 11 should inhibit microbial growth. Refer to the Material Safety Data Sheet for further information handling and transport.

ALFOTERRA is a registered trademark of Sasol North America Inc. The preceding data is based on tests an d experience, which Sasol North America believes reliable, and is supplied for informational purposes only. Sasol North America expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for damage or injury which results from the use of the preceding data and nothin g c ontained therein shall constitute a guarantee, warranty, or representation (including freedom from patent liability) by Sasol North America with respect to the data, the pr oduct described, or its fitness for use for any specific purpose, even if that purpo se is known to Sasol North America. For detailed safety and handling information regarding these products, please refer to the respective Sasol North America Material Safety Data Sheet. 6/20/2010
# **Older Americans Month: Communities of Strength**

## May 2021

In tough times, communities find strength in people—and people find strength in their communities. In the past year, we’ve seen this time and again in [name of town/community] as friends, neighbors, and businesses have found new ways to support each other. 

In our community, older adults are a key source of this strength. Through their experiences, successes, and difficulties, they have built resilience that helps them to face new challenges. When communities tap into this, they become stronger too.

Each May, the Administration for Community Living leads the celebration of Older Americans Month (OAM). This year’s theme is *Communities of Strength*, recognizing the important role older adults play in fostering the connection and engagement that build strong, resilient communities.

Strength is built and shown not only by bold acts, but also small ones of day-to-day life—a conversation shared with a friend, working in the garden, trying a new recipe, or taking time for a cup of tea on a busy day. And when we share these activities with others—even virtually or by telling about the experience later—we help them build resilience too. 

This year, [organization name] will celebrate OAM by encouraging community members to share their experiences. Together, we can find strength—and create a stronger future. 

Here are some ways to share and connect:

· **Look for joy in the everyday:**Celebrate small moments and ordinary pleasures by taking time to recognize them. Start a gratitude journal and share it with others via social media, or call a friend or family member to share a happy moment or to say thank you. 

· **Reach out to neighbors:** Even if you can’t get together in person right now, you can still connect with your neighbors. Leave a small gift on their doorstep, offer to help with outdoor chores, or deliver a homecooked meal.

· **Build new skills:**Learning something new allows us to practice overcoming challenges. Take an art course online or try a socially distanced outdoor movement class to enjoy learning with others in your community. Have a skill to share? Find an opportunity to teach someone, even casually.

· **Share your story:**There’s a reason storytelling is a time-honored activity. Hearing how others experience the world helps us grow. Interviewing family, friends, and neighbors can open up new conversations and strengthen our connections. 

When people of different ages, backgrounds, abilities, and talents share experiences—through action, story, or service—we help build strong communities. And that’s something to celebrate! Please join [organization/community name] in strengthening our community – [insert call to action, such as joining a virtual event or engaging on social media activities].

[Optional: organization contact person, social media links, and/or website as suitable for call to action and any activities announced.]

For more resources**,**visit the official OAM website, follow ACL on Twitter and Facebook,

and join the conversation via #OlderAmericansMonth.
#### § 207.170c Kissimmee River, navigation locks between Lake Tohopekaliga and Lake Okeechobee, Fla.; use, administration, and navigation.

(a) The owner of or agency controlling the locks shall be required to open the navigation locks upon demand for passage of vessels during the following hours and periods:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Locks S-61, S-65, and S-65E |
| Monday through Friday | All year | 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. |
| Saturday and Sunday | Mar. 1 through Oct. 31 | 5:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. |
| Do | Nov. 1 through Feb. 28 | 5:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. |
| Lock S-65A |
| Seven days a week | All year | 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. |
| Locks S-65B, S-65C, and S-65D |
| Monday through Friday | All year | 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. |
| Saturday and Sunday | Mar. 1 through Oct. 31 | 5:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. |
| Do | Nov. 1 through Feb. 28 | 5:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. |

(b) The owner of or agency controlling the locks shall place signs, of such size and description as may be designated by the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Florida, at each side of the locks indicating the nature of the regulations of this section.

[29 FR 2384, Feb. 12, 1964, as amended at 31 FR 7566, May 26, 1966; 33 FR 7626, May 23, 1968]
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the "Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Thomas Kidrin
 Thomas Kidrin
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 Date: August 14, 2009
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.7 Requirements for vessel operators. ( a ) No person may operate any vessel equipped with installed toilet facilities unless it is equipped with: ( 1 ) An operable Type II or III device that has a label on it under § 159.16 or that is certified under § 159.12 or § 159.12a; or
( 2 ) An operable Type I device that has a label on it under § 159.16 or that is certified under § 159.12, if the vessel is 19.7 meters (65 feet) or less in length.
( b ) When operating a vessel on a body of water where the discharge of treated or untreated sewage is prohibited by the Environmental Protection Agency under 40 CFR 140.3 or 140.4, the operator must secure each Type I or Type II device in a manner which prevents discharge of treated or untreated sewage. Acceptable methods of securing the device include— ( 1 ) Closing the seacock and removing the handle;
( 2 ) Padlocking the seacock in the closed position;
( 3 ) Using a non-releasable wire-tie to hold the seacock in the closed position; or
( 4 ) Locking the door to the space enclosing the toilets with a padlock or door handle key lock.
( c ) When operating a vessel on a body of water where the discharge of untreated sewage is prohibited by the Environmental Protection Agency under 40 CFR 140.3, the operator must secure each Type III device in a manner which prevents discharge of sewage. Acceptable methods of securing the device include— ( 1 ) Closing each valve leading to an overboard discharge and removing the handle;
( 2 ) Padlocking each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position; or
( 3 ) Using a non-releasable wire-tie to hold each valve leading to an overboard discharge in the closed position.
[CGH 95-028, 62 FR 51194, Sept. 30, 1997]
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2007CV F001899D 2, s t y l ed Anas t aci o G
. G ar z a and Bar bar a T. G ar z a v . Al ej andr o E. V i l l ar r eal , Jr
. , A l f ons o J. G ar

z a, P edr o A. G onz al ez , O l ga V. G ui nee , Cr i s t obal Vi l l ar r eal , and H ui s ache Cat t l e Com pany, Lt d. , pe nd i ng i n t he 1 1 1 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , W eb b C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Ra ul V asquez presi d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-09-00554- CV IN RE Anastac io G. GARZA and B arba ra T. G arza Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini , J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons , J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: September 9, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED The c ourt has conside red r elators’ petition for writ of mandamus and emer g ency motion for i m m e d i at e t e mp o r ar

y r e l i e f
. T h e c o urt i s o f

th e o p i n i o nth atr e l i e f

s h o u l d b e d e n i e d
. A c c o r d i n g l y, relators’ petition for wr it of mandamus and emer g ency motion for immediate tempora ry relief are denied. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P
. 5 2
. 8 (a ). R el at o rs s h al l p ay al l co s t s i n cu rr edi nth i s p ro ce ed i n g. PER C URI AM
Rockingham

No. 7173

#### State of New York v. George F. Rooney

October 31, 1975

*Paul A. Rinden andJay M. Niederman (Mr. Niederman*orally) for the State of New York.

George F. Rooney, by brief and orally, pro se.

Per curiam.

The questions presented by the exceptions of both parties to rulings by the superior court including dismissal of the plaintiff’s suit to enforce a New York judgment and disallowance of the defendant’s counterclaim were reserved and transferred by the Presiding Justice, *Perkins,*J.

On November 30, 1972, a default judgment was entered against the defendant in an action in New York brought by the plaintiff to recover certain overpayments under a contract for services rendered by the defendant in New York. Subsequently, the plaintiff brought the present action to enforce the New York judgment. Again the defendant defaulted, and judgment was entered against him on June 15, 1973, by *Perkins,*J. Thereafter, the judgment was vacated *(Morris,*J.) and the defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim for monies owed. At a subsequent hearing before *Perkins,*J., the Court ruled that the New York judgment “is an *in rem*judgment and therefore the action on saidjudgment in New Hampshire does not lie and accordingly is dismissed”.

Examination of the record before us indicates that the New York judgment was a valid in personam judgment entitled to full faith and credit in our courts. *Sampson v. Conlon,*100 N.H. 358, 126 A.2d 250 (1956); *Moore v. Moore,*96 N.H. 130, 71 A.2d 409 (1950); *Emery v.*
      *604
      *Hovey,*84 N.H. 499, 153 A. 322 (1931). The contract was entered into in New York and entirely performed in New York. By the time the New York action was commenced, the defendant was a resident of Kensington, New Hampshire. It is not disputed that he was served personally in New Hampshire in that action, in compliance with the New York long-arm statute, by a representative of the Rockingham County sheriff’s office. See C.P.L.R. § 313. Nor has the defendant averred that the New York long-arm statute cannot constitutionally reach him in this case. C.P.L.R. § 302 (a); *Pennoyer v. Neff,*95 U.S. 714 (1877); *International Shoe Co. v. Washington,*326 U.S. 310 *(1945); Longines-Wittnauer Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke,*15 N.Y. 2d 443, 209 N.E.2d 68, 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 (1965); *see Roy v. Transairco Inc.,*112 N.H. 171, 291 A.2d 605 (1972); *Leeper v. Leeper,*114 N.H. 294, 319 A.2d 626 (1974); *Kinchla v. Baumner,*114 N.H. 818, 330 A.2d 112 (1974). The existence of the judgment was properly pleaded and on the present state of the record the plaintiff’s action was erroneously dismissed. The order of the trial court is vacated.

*Exceptions sustained; remanded.*

Grimes, J., did not sit.