alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the Form
10-Q for  September  30, 1996,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000044545
<NAME> GULF POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,067,823
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                            654
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             183,095
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            82,817
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,334,389
<COMMON>                                            38,060
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          218,519
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                190,093
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     446,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                         89,602
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               321,054 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  37,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           10,817 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       40,817 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                              0 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                         0 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     387,927 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    1,334,389 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          488,361 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                30,634 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         383,393 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         414,027 
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             74,334
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                     (54)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      74,280
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            22,408
<NET-INCOME>                                        51,872
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          4,312
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       47,560
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            37,100
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             127,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        



</TABLE>
#### § 337.5 General authorizations.

Under the provisions of sections 404(e) of the CWA and 104(c) of the ODA certain categories of activities may be authorized on a regional, statewide, or nationwide basis. General authorizations can be a useful mechanism for implementation of the procedural provisions of the CWA, CZMA, and ODA while avoiding unnecessary duplication and paperwork. Through the general authorization process, compliance with all environmental laws and regulations including coastal zone consistency, if applicable, and water quality certification can be accomplished in a single process for a category of activities. Since the emphasis of particular environmental issues for most Corps projects is more regional than nationwide, district engineers are encouraged to develop general authorizations for routine Civil Works activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill material to address the specific requirements of a particular geographic region. When evaluating general categories of activities, the district engineer should follow the same procedure as outlined for individual Federal activities including the water quality certification and/or coastal zone consistency requirements of part 336 of this chapter. General authorizations should include related activities of local interests. Additionally, district engineers should use existing general permits authorized on a statewide or regional basis and the nationwide permits at 33 CFR part 330 for Federal projects involving the disposal of dredged material. The development of new statewide or regional general authorizations for Federal activities should be in accordance with the requirements of §§ 336.1 and 336.2 of this chapter. General permits for related activities of local interests should be developed using the procedures of 33 CFR parts 320 through 330.
# Official Journal C 412A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 412A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 629 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 412A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 629 December 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 412 A/01 | Notice of vacancy — CONS/AD/152/19 | 1 |
| 2019/C 412 A/02 | Notice of vacancy — CONS/AD/155/19 | 20 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2019/C 412 A/01

Notice of vacancy — CONS/AD/152/19

1

2019/C 412 A/02

Notice of vacancy — CONS/AD/155/19

20

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Workplace Conflict Management","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qIkEAmmFVT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/about-adr\/workplace-conflict-management\/\">Workplace Conflict Management<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/about-adr\/workplace-conflict-management\/embed\/#?secret=qIkEAmmFVT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Workplace Conflict Management” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"qIkEAmmFVT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### § 230.15 Mitigation and monitoring.

See 40 CFR 1505.2(c) and 1505.3. District commanders shall, upon request from interested agencies or the public, provide reports on the progress and status of required mitigation and other provisions of their decisions on Corps projects. The term monitoring will be interpreted as that oversight activity necessary to ensure that the decision, including required mitigation measures, is implemented.
CH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0509

CITY OF KALISPELL,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHELLE SQUIER RAVE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including February 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

State’s response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 17 2023

01/17/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0509
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
"Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Thomas
Kidrin
 Thomas
Kidrin
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 Date:
August 16, 2010
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA,

MARIANA LOPEZ,

CARLOS LOPEZ, AND 

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., 

REINIER CORTES, AND 

ANDREA GONZALEZ 

QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE

THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court on Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery 

Deadline, and the Court, after having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise duly advised in 

the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED:

The Order Setting Trial Deadlines shall be amended to reflect that all discovery shall be 

completed by May 6, 2022.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this _____ day of February 2023.

________________________________ 

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Designated U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record by CM/ECF

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 47-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1442]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2377]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings; Correction

January 12, 2000.
    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents 
are available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions 
must be filed by February 7, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the 
Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.
    Subject: Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CC 
Docket No. 97-213)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1442 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
§ 334.900 Pacific Ocean, U.S. Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, Calif.; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* Beginning at the shoreline north of the boat basin, latitude 33°13′10′′, longitude 117°24′19′′; thence westward to latitude 33°12′48′′, longitude 117°24′56′′; thence southward to latitude 33°12′32′′, longitude 117°24′44′′; thence eastward to latitude 33°12′47′′, longitude 117°24′17′′ (a point on the breakwater); thence northeastward along breakwater to latitude 33°12′58′′, longitude 117°24′09′′; thence northward along shoreline to point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No vessels shall anchor within the restricted area at any time.
( 2 ) Dredging, dragging, seining, fishing operations, and other activities, which might foul underwater installations within the restricted area, are prohibited.
( 3 ) All vessels entering the restricted area shall proceed across the area by the most direct route and without unnecessary delay.
( 4 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding General, U.S. Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California, and such agencies as he may designate.
[24 FR 1214, Feb. 17, 1959. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 22-8336-BER 

 

IN RE: 

SEALED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER TO SEAL

 

 This cause came before this Court on the Government’s Motion to Seal. The Court being 

fully advised in the premises, it is hereby: 

 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Government’s Motion is hereby granted, and the 

Clerk of the Court shall seal the Criminal Complaint, Affidavit, and supporting documentation 

with the exception of a copy of the Warrant for Arrest to be provided to the U.S. Marshals Service 

and law enforcement agent whose name is noted on the Arrest Warrant until the defendant is 

arrested or until further order of the Court. 

 DONE AND ORDERED at West Palm Beach, Florida, this day of August, 2022. 

 

 BRUCE E. REINHART 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

TM Aug 5, 2022 West Palm Beach

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
ACL Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology (PAAT) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2023 Annual Allocation

2/24/2023

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy for 

Assistive 

Technology (PAAT)

Alabama $68,021

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $98,206

Arkansas $50,000

California $529,577

Colorado $78,443

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $293,971

Georgia $145,757

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $171,022

Indiana $91,858

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $60,862

Louisiana $62,409

Maine $50,000

Maryland $83,208

Massachusetts $94,270

Michigan $135,652

Minnesota $77,030

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $83,250

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $125,075

New Mexico $50,000

New York $267,717

North Carolina $142,405

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $158,990

Oklahoma $53,806

Oregon $57,309

Pennsylvania $174,971

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $70,057

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $94,142

Texas $398,527

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $116,641

Washington $104,446

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $79,575

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $30,000

Guam $30,000

Northern Mariana Islands $30,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $30,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $30,000

TOTAL $5,267,197
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FirstOttawa Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Joachim J. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Joachim J. Brown    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| Joachim J. Brown        |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| March 29, 2004          |

 

----
**1998In order to supply data users with current information between issues of Cotton and Wool Situation and Outlook report, ERS is now issuing monthlydata tables.  These will be issued on:February 12, April 13, June 15, September 14, October 13, December 14.To access these reports, click here.- Cotton and Wool Outlook Update 11.12.98 [ Text  ] Cotton and Wool Outlook Update 08.13.98 [ Text ]Cotton and Wool Outlook Update 07.13.98 [
Text ]Cotton and Wool Outlook Update 06.23.98 [
Spreadsheet 12kB
 ]
- Cotton and Wool Outlook Update 05.13.98 [ Text  ] Cotton and Wool Outlook Update 03.13.98 [Text ]

**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-245-001]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 31, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 25, 2000, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be 
effective May 1, 2000:

    Seventh Revised Sheet No. 176

    East Tennessee asserts that this filing is in compliance with the 
Commission's May 12, 2000 Letter Order in the above-referenced docket, 
which required East Tennessee to file revised tariff language to update 
certain EDI data sets incorporated by reference to GISB Version 1.3.
    East Tennessee states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14077 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SUTTER HOLDING COMPANY,
INC. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, William G. Knuff, III, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ WILLIAM G. KNUFF, III
--------------------------------------
William G. Knuff, III,
Chief Financial Officer of
Sutter Holding Company, Inc.

April 14, 2005
March 3, 2011

Docket Section U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Docket DOT-OST-2003-14694, Intra-Al aska Bush Service Mail Rates

To Whom It May Concern:

The Consolidated Carriers have no objection to granting an extension of time to respond to the Reply of the Consolidated Carriers filed February 28, 2011. The proposal of Penair is the most significant change in mail rate structur e since 2003. The proposal also raises the policy issue of providing economic incentive to downgrade large aircraft operations from Part 121. That incentive is cont rary to the intent of the Rural Service Improvement Act.

We must be careful to understand the imp act of reduced mail pay on carriers who do not have any ability to alter thei r operations. When the D.O.T. eliminated the Part 121 STOL rate because it became higher than the Part 135 Wheel rate, ERA c ould not operate its Bethel bush service more efficiently and subseq uently eliminated all bush service at that

hub.

Respectfully submitted

Hank Myers

MTC ● P.O. Box 7142 Bellevue, WA 98008-1142 ● (425) 830-4265 ● hank@mtcworld.com
Merrimack

No. 7822

#### Richard E. Clark *& a.*v. Lake Shore Farm, Inc. *& a.*

November 16, 1977

*Orr & Reno*and *John W. Barto,*of Concord *(Mr. Barto*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Victor H. Dakar,*of Manchester, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

A Master *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.) found that defendant agreed to pay plaintiff ten percent of the cost of materials in addition to a wage of $5 per hour for work on a building. A verdict was rendered on the master’s report for an agreed amount of $2,250 and defendant’s exceptions were transferred by *Perkins,*J. There was evidence to support the finding made by the master and, therefore, the finding must stand. *Ciborowski v. Robinson,*116 N.H. 723, 366 A.2d 493 (1976).

*Exceptions overruled.*

Lampron, J., did not participate in the decision of this case; Superior Court Justices Flynn and Cann sat by special assignment pursuant to RSA 490:3.