alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-152586, 333-148528, 333-138066, 333-128858, 333-120607, 333-110055,333-109302, 333-100456, 333-75608, 333-72568, 333-72574, 333-56480, 333-47126, 333-40910 and 333-34370 on Form S-8 of our reports dated July 24, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Palm,Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in IncomeTaxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*), and relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedMay 31, 2009. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Jose, California 

July 24, 2009
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.T01-0286 Safety Zone; Shrewsbury River, S-32 Bridge, Boroughs of Rumson and Sea Bright, NJ. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Shrewsbury River, within a 100-yard radius of the center point of the S-32 Bridge, County Route 520 (Rumson Road) in the boroughs of Rumson and Sea Bright, New Jersey.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, *Designated Representative* means a Coast Guard Officer, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port New York (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, no person or vessel may enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or the COTP's designated representative.
( 2 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative via VHF channel 16 or by phone at (718) 354-4353 (Sector New York Command Center). Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
( d ) *Enforcement period.* This section is effective from December 1, 2023, through December 31, 2024, but will only be enforced during periods when heavy lift operations at the new bridge are in progress.
[Doc No. USCG-2023-0286, 88 FR 80139, Nov. 17, 2023] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: By USCG-2023-0286, 88 FR 80139, Nov. 17, 2023, § 165.T01-0286 was added, effective Dec. 1, 2023, through Dec. 31, 2024.
**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the annual report of 5G Wireless Communications, Inc.
      (“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the
      capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated: April 16,
              2007
            /s/ Jerry Dix
              Jerry
                Dix,
              Chief
                Executive Officer







Dated: April 16,
              2007
            /s/ Andrew D. McCormac
              Andrew
                D. McCormac,
              Chief
                Financial Officer
§ 2.32 High seas. ( a ) For purposes of special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7, *high seas* means all waters seaward of the territorial sea baseline.
( b ) For the purposes of section 2 of the Act of February 19, 1895, as amended (33 U.S.C. 151) and the Inland Navigational Rules Act of 1980 (33 U.S.C. Chapter 34), *high seas* means the waters seaward of any lines established under these statutes, including the lines described in part 80 of this chapter and 46 CFR part 7.
( c ) For the purposes of 14 U.S.C. 522, 14 U.S.C. 545, 33 U.S.C. 409, and 33 U.S.C. 1471 *et seq.,* high seas includes the exclusive economic zones of the United States and other nations, as well as those waters that are seaward of territorial seas of the United States and other nations.
( d ) Under customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and without prejudice to high seas freedoms that may be exercised within exclusive economic zones pursuant to article 58 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and unless the context clearly requires otherwise (e.g., The International Convention Relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties, 1969, including annexes thereto), *high seas* means all waters that are not the exclusive economic zone (as defined in § 2.30), territorial sea (as defined in § 2.22), or internal waters of the United States or any other nation.
[USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42598, July 18, 2003, as amended by USCG-2007-27887, 72 FR 45902, Aug. 16, 2007; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58275, Sept. 18, 2020;]
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Southern District of Florida

NELSON FERNANDEZ

GUESS? RETAIL, INC.

9:22-CV-81334-AHS

Pelayo Duran, Esq.

09/08/2022

09/08/2022

GUESS? RETAIL, INC. KEVIN M. YOUNG, ESQ.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

1075 PEACHTREE STREET NE, SUITE 2500

ATLANTA GA 30309-3958

kyoung@seyfarth.com

(404) 885-1500

Case 9:22-cv-81334-AHS Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 723 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 723

To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during 
    the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 8 (legislative day, November 20), 2008

   Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during 
    the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND HOUSEWARES DURING 
              THE HOLIDAY SEASON FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 
              BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules 
or regulations of the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer, or employee of the Senate may 
        collect from another Senator, officer, or employee of the 
        Senate within Senate buildings nonmonetary donations of 
        clothing, toys, food, and housewares for charitable purposes 
        related to serving those in need or members of the Armed 
        Services and their families during the holiday season, if such 
        purposes do not otherwise violate any rule or regulation of the 
        Senate or of Federal law; and
            (2) a Senator, officer, or employee of the Senate may work 
        with a nonprofit organization with respect to the delivery of 
        donations described in paragraph (1).
    (b) Expiration.--The authority provided by this resolution shall 
expire at the end of the 110th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
1

Date: October 5, 2010

Subject: Minutes of the October 5, 2010 Conference Call with Representatives from 

Industry

EPA Contract No. EP-D-06-118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4-06

RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French

OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0239

I. Introduction

A conference call with representatives of the gold mining industry was held on October 5, 

2010. This memorandum summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting.

II. Attendees

Melissa Barbanell, Barrick Senior Counsel, Regulatory Policy

Mike Tomko, Parsons Behle & Latimer

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Richard Marinshaw, RTI International

Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III. Discussion

The major topics discussed during the meeting included title V permitting, hydrogen 

cyanide, fugitive mercury emissions, Facility M and the new source carbon processes MACT 

limit, ore pretreatment processes MACT limit, and monitoring of the roaster.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Dix, Chief
Executive Officer, and I, Don Boudewyn, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge:

(1)   Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to 5G Wireless Communications, Inc.
and will be retained by 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                        /s/ Jerry Dix
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jerry Dix
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/ Don Boudewyn
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Don Boudewyn
                                        Principal Financial Officer

May 18, 2004
#### Rootes v. Holliday and Welch.

Saturday, Dec. 17th, 1814.

i. Appeal Bond — Sufficiency.*—An appeal bond, executed by a surety only, without any principal obligor, is insufficient.

See Key. Code, 1st yol. ch. 66, sect. 58.

*

Appeal Bond. — See monographic *note*on “Appeals” appended to Hill v. Salem, etc., Turnpike Co., 1 Rob. 263.

Appeals — Dismissal—Costs—Wherever an appeal is dismissed as improvidently allowed, or a supersedeas quashed as Improvidently allowed, the court "has always refused to give costs to the party prevailing. Ayres v. Lewellin, 3 Leigh 617, citing principal case.

In this case, the appeal was dismissed, (on motion of the appellees,) on the ground that the appeal bond, being executed by the surety only, without any principal obligor, was insufficient to authorize the appeal, which, therefore, was improvidently allowed.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matthew J. Espe, Chief Executive Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IKON Office Solutions, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent financial quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: July 8, 2005                  
|                                    
|/s/ MATTHEW J. ESPE                 
|Matthew J. Espe                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of China Marine Food Group Limited, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Marine Food Group Limited and will be retained by China Marine Food Group
Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




Date:
      March 22, 2010
                /s/
      Pengfei LiuPengfei
      Liu, Chief Executive
Officer
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 13 - 01752 Directorate ID : 20 09 - SW - 44 - AD Helicopter Model: Pacific Scientific Aviation Services Seat Restraint Sy stem Rotary Buckle Assemblies Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators) : 1,435 restraint systems installed on aircraft in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to replace cracked buckle handles and allow the release of the restraint system strap in an emergency . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 250 to rep lace a buckle Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 work- hour x 

### $ 8 5 /work hour to replace a buckle ) $ 43 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 293 Total US Fleet Cost $ 420,455 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory a ction?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Robert Grant
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 687 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in People of the State of 

Michigan v. Sereal Leonard Gravlin 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in People 

of the State of Michigan v. Sereal Leonard Gravlin 

Whereas, in the case of People of the State of Michigan v. 

Sereal Leonard Gravlin (Case No. 08–007750), pending 

in the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court (Oakland County, 

Michigan), the prosecuting attorney has subpoenaed testimony from Ruth Gallop, an employee in the office of 

Senator Debbie Stabenow; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 

288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 687 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Ruth Gallop and any other employee 

2 of Senator Stabenow’s office from whom testimony may 

3 be required are authorized to testify in the case of People 

4 of the State of Michigan v. Sereal Leonard Gravlin, except 

5 concerning matters for which a privilege should be as6 serted. 

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

8 represent Ruth Gallop and any other employee of the Sen9 ator from whom evidence may be required in the action 

10 referenced in section 1 of this resolution. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
§ 138.160 Non-owning COFR Operator's responsibility for identification. ( a ) Each COFR Operator of a vessel with a COFR, other than an unmanned, non-self-propelled barge, who is not also an owner of the vessel must ensure that the original or a legible copy of the vessel's demise charter-party (or other written document on the owner's letterhead, signed by the vessel owner, which specifically identifies the COFR Operator named on the COFR) is maintained on board the vessel.
( b ) The demise charter-party or other document required by paragraph (a) of this section must be presented, upon request, for examination and copying, to the Director or other United States Government official.