alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32(d)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gulf Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Susan N. Story

Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Philip C. Raymond

Philip C. Raymond

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                       |

 

 

Date:  May 7, 2008
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2000 Page 1 of 3
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2000 Page 2 of 3
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2000 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT
32.2






STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
"Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
that:




* the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Christopher
Ryan


Christopher
Ryan


Chief
Financial Officer








Date:
August 8, 2008







This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed a part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ PAUL G. DRISCOLL
         ------------------------------
                Paul G. Driscoll
               Vice President and
             Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  August 7, 2007




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-272-001]


Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 31, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 25, 2000, Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC 
(GBGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be effective May 
1, 2000:

    Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 293
    Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 294

    On May 5, 2000, GBGP filed tariff sheets in Docket No. RP00-272-000 
(May 5th filing) to revise its Form of Interactive Internet Website 
Agreement because of a change of vendors for its interactive Internet 
website computer applications. GBGP used language similar to the 
language filed by Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, LLC (MCGP) and 
Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C (Nautilus) in Docket Nos. RP00-271-000 
and RP00-270-000, respectively. A shipper objected to certain revised 
language in both of those proceedings. MCGP and Nautilus are filing 
contemporaneously herewith, to replace the objectionable language with 
language currently in effect. Although no party objected to GBBP's 
proposed language, GBGP is willing to restore the currently effective 
tariff language in order to remain consistent with the Nautilus and 
MCGP tariffs and alleviate any similar concerns. In addition, GBGP is 
correcting an incorrect reference to Interactive Internet Website that 
was included in the original filing. GBGP requests waiver of the 30-day 
notice requirement in section 154.207 so that the tariff sheets 
contained herein can become effective on the same date as the tariff 
sheets filed in the original May 5th filing.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14080 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|  | National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS) Jointly Produced byOffice of Research and Applications(ORA)**and**National Climatic Data Center(NCDC) Time Series of Global Monthly Vegetation Coverfrom NOAA/AVHRR (1985 - 1997)[This website represents a subsample of the actual CD-ROM available fromNCDC - only the data for 1985 are contained herein]**Version 1.1 February 2001 Now Available****Revision Information**Technical InformationPrefaceDigital Data Information3rd Generation C-level NDVIImageryReprint of "The Enhanced NOAAGlobalLand Dataset from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer"PaperReferencesAcknowledgmentDisclaimer**** |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Steven A. Horowitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Genio Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: January 16, 2007                 By: /s/ Steven A. Horowitz
                                           ----------------------
                                           Steven A. Horowitz
                                           CFO and principal financial officer
Harassment and Bullying Quiz

1. If a coworker or supervisor gets frustrated and loudly says “You did this wrong!” then they are a bully. 

Raising your voice or yelling even once is considered bullying behavior.

❏ TRUE ❏ FALSE 

2. If a coworker has established a pattern of mean-spirited comments and talking behind your back, the 

best solution is:

a) Don’t make a fuss—it’s just words, and words can’t really hurt you.

b) Find a time to speak to your coworker and ask them to stop their

hurtful comments and gossip.

c) Ask a witness to be present if you are worried about receiving a

hostile response when you speak to your coworker.

d) Both (b) and (c) above.

3. As long as you do not participate in bullying behavior at work, you have no further responsibilities. It 

would just make things worse if you got involved.

❏ TRUE ❏ FALSE 

4. If you are being bullied, it’s probably your fault. If you just stop doing those things that annoy the 

bully, he or she will be sure to leave you alone.

❏ TRUE ❏ FALSE 

5. What are some of the sources of workplace bullying?

a) Bullies can be bored or feel underappreciated and use bullying for entertainment or to feel more 

powerful.

b) Bullies often pick on coworkers who they feel threatened by or have a personality conflict with.

c) Bullies can target coworkers or subordinates they feel are not “pulling their own weight” or 

contributing adequately to the team effort.

d) All of the above. Individuals who are protected against retaliation include those who object to 

unwelcome behavior, make a complaint, or participate in an investigation.

6. If someone accuses you of bullying, you might as well quit your job right then, because no one will 

listen to your side of the story or believe that you can ever work with that person again.

❏ TRUE ❏ FALSE 

7. In mild cases of bullying, a conversation between the parties can often clear the air and provide a basis 

for improved relationships going forward. What are some of the solutions that can used for solving more 

serious situations?

a) An organization’s discipline process, up to and including termination in severe cases.

b) EEOC complaint

c) Promoting the bully to get them out of their current department.

d) Both (a) and (b) above.

8. If a bunch of subordinates get together and agree to be disrespectful and not do what their boss says, 

this can be considered bullying. Even those with authority in an organization can be victims.

❏ TRUE ❏ FALSE
§ 155.5021 Operating restrictions. Nontank vessels subject to this subpart may not— ( a ) Operate upon the navigable waters of the United States unless in compliance with a vessel response plan (VRP) approved under § 155.5065.
( b ) Continue to operate on the navigable waters of the United States if— ( 1 ) The Coast Guard determines that the response resources identified in the vessel's certification statement do not meet the requirements of this subpart;
( 2 ) The contracts or agreements required in §§ 155.5050 and 155.5052 and the vessel's certification statement are no longer valid;
( 3 ) The vessel is not operating in compliance with the submitted VRP; or
( 4 ) The period of the VRP authorization has expired.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80128-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GEORGE MURILLO, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/ 

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED PSI OBJECTION

Defendant, George Murillo, by and through undersigned counsel, files the 

following objection to the Presentence Investigation Report (PSI):

At paragraph 16, the four level “specific offense characteristic” for “trafficking” 

of firearms does not apply in this case. The parties agree that as a matter of law Mr. 

Murillo’s offense conduct of selling or attempting to sell two of his personal firearms 

to one individual does not qualify as “trafficking” of firearms. This agreement is 

consistent with the plea agreement, at DE 23 and summarized in paragraph 4 of the 

PSI, which notes that the parties agreed that no specific offenses characteristics 

apply. 

While the defense would note that the guideline commentary is not binding 

pursuant to the Eleventh Circuit’s recent en banc decision in United States v. Dupree, 

No. 19-13776 (Jan. 18, 2023), the commentary itself indicates that the trafficking 

enhancement requires the individual taking possession of the firearm to have a prior 

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

conviction for a crime of violence, a controlled substance offense, or a misdemeanor 

crime of domestic violence. See USSG 2K2.1 N.13(B). There is no evidence in this case 

that the individual Mr. Murillo attempted to sell his personal firearms met these 

criteria. As such, even if the commentary were controlling or even persuasive, the 

enhancement does not apply in this case. 

AUSA Laura Gatz was contacted and agrees with the defendant that the 

trafficking enhancement does not apply in this case and that the four level 

enhancement should be removed from the guideline calculation. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 

 MICHAEL CARUSO

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

 s/ Kristy Militello 

Kristy Militello

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for the Defendant

Florida Bar No. 0056366

 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400

 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

(561) 833-6288 Telephone 

Kristy_Militello@fd.org

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 30, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices 

of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for 

those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of 

Electronic Filing.

 s/ Kristy Militello 

Kristy Militello

 

 

 

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### Zimmerman Manufacturing Company v. Addison Tower.

Filed May 2, 1894.

No. 5269.

Failure to File Briefs: Review. This cause having been submitted to the court upon the transcript and bill of exceptions, without any brief or oral argument from either party, the judgment is affirmed without an examination of the record. *Stabler v. Gund,*35 Neb., 648, followed.

Error from the district court of Furnas county. Tried below before Cochran, J.

*G. W. Norris,*for plaintiff in error.

*McClure & Anderson, contra.*

Norvad, C. J.

This was a suit upon a promissory note for $25. The defense set up in the answer was a breach of warranty in the sale of a windmill and pump, for which property said note was given as part of the purchase price. The cause was tried to the court below on the pleadings and evidence, which resulted in a judgment for the defendant.

The errors assigned in the petition in error are that the finding and judgment are contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The case was submitted to this court upon the transcript and bill of exceptions without any brief or oral argument for either party. In *Stabler v. Gund,*35 Neb., 648, it was said: “This court is burdened with business, and counsel bringing cases here for review should file briefs of the points and authorities relied upon for a reversal of the judgment. A case that does not possess sufficient merit to demand the filing of briefs is of too little *307importance to occupy the time of the court in its consideration, and in the future such cases, ordinarily, will be affirmed without an investigation of the questions presented.” We adhere to that decision. It will control this case. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres

DELIO BATISTA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte. On September 21, 2023, Defendant, 

Avant Assurance, Inc. filed a Renewed Rule 59 Motion for Remittitur, or Alternatively, New 

Trial [ECF No. 124]. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [ECF No. 124] is REFERRED to 

United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres to take all necessary and proper action as 

required by law. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 6th day of October, 2023.

 ________________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### GEORGE W. LESLIE, Receiver, etc., Appellant, *v.*EPHRAIM DINGMAN, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Oswego, in favor of the defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the judge’s minutes.

A question of fact alone was presented by this appeal, which, the General Term *held,*had been properly submitted to the jury.

*C. W. Avery,*for the appellant.

*F. David,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Morgan, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Morgan, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-20227-CR-MARTINEZ/BECERRA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALDO DAVID CARRERA, 

Defendant. 

I ------- --- --- --- --

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CHANGE OF PLEA 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District 

Court to conduct a Change of Plea Hearing before a Magistrate Judge. 

THE MATTER was heard in front of Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra on October 

19, 2022 [DE: 26] at the request of the Defendant, the Defendant's Attorney, and the Assistant 

United States Attorney assigned to this case. A Report and Recommendation was filed on 

October 19, 2022, recommending that the Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted [DE: 28]. The 

Defendant and the Government were afforded the opportunity to file objections to the Report and 

Recommendation, however none were filed. The Court has conducted a de nova review of the 

entire file and after careful consideration, the Court affirms and adopts the Report and 

Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby: 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [DE: 28] of 

United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra, is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

The Defendant is adjudged guilty of Counts I of the Indictment. Count I Charges 

Defendant with bank robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2113(a). 

The Defendant acknowledged that he understood the statutory penalties that apply in his case. 

Sentencing has been set in this matter on Wednesday, December 28, 2022, at 

Case 1:22-cr-20227-JEM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 2
11:00a.m., before the Honorable District Judge Jose E. Martinez, at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, 

United States Courthouse, 400 N. Miami Avenue, Courtroom 10-1, Miami, Florida 33128. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this Lday of November, 2022. 

cc: 

Hon. Magistrate Jacqueline Becerra 

All Counsel of Record 

U.S. Probation Office 

Case 1:22-cr-20227-JEM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 2