alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of BSI2000, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




BSI2000,
              INC.Date: May
              8,
              2006
            By:
            /s/Jack
              HarperName:Jack
                Harper
              Title:
                Principal Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to BSI2000, Inc. and will be retained by
      BSI2000, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001146

20-NOV-2015

08:42 AM
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  November 7, 2008
    /s/ Kevin KyserKevin Kyser,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1401 Apra Harbor, Guam—safety zones. ( a ) *Location.* ( 1 ) The following is designated Safety Zone A: The waters of Apra Outer Harbor encompassed within an arc of 1,000 yards radius centered at the center of Naval Wharf Kilo, located at 13 degrees 26′44.5′′ N and 144 degrees 37′50.7′′ E. (Based on World Geodetic System 1984 Datum).
( 2 ) The following is designated Safety Zone B: The waters of Apra Outer Harbor encompassed within an arc of 1,400 yards radius centered at the center of Naval Wharf Kilo, located at 13 degrees 26′44.5′′ N and 144 degrees 37′50.7′′ E. (Based on World Geodetic System 1984 Datum).
( b ) *Special regulations.* ( 1 ) Safety Zone A, described in paragraph (a) of this section, will only be enforced when Naval Wharf Kilo, or a vessel berthed at Naval Wharf Kilo, is displaying a red (BRAVO) flag by day or a red light by night, accompanied by a “SAFETY ZONE A” sign.
( 2 ) Safety Zone B, described in paragraph (a) of this section, will only be enforced when Naval Wharf Kilo, or a vessel berthed at Naval Wharf Kilo, is displaying a red (BRAVO) flag by day or a red light by night, accompanied by a “SAFETY ZONE B” sign.
( 3 ) Under general regulations in § 165.23, entry into the zones described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, U.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia/Sector Guam.
[USCG-2013-0935, 80 FR 1338, Jan. 9, 2015, as amended by USCG-2022-0429, 87 FR 48446, Aug. 9, 2022]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 15, 2023

Nos. 04-19-00714-CV, 04-19-00715-CV, 04-19-00716-CV

Todd A. DURDEN,

Appellant

v. 

TullyJames T. “Tully” SHAHAN, in his Official Capacity as County Judge; Mark Frerich, in his 

Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Joe Montalvo, in his Official Capacity as County 

Commissioner; Dennis Dodson, in his Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Tim Ward, in 

his Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Kinney County Commissioners Court; Kinney 

County; and Rick Alvarado, in his Official Capacity as District and County Clerk of Kinney,

Appellees

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 4845, 4863, 4866

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After the Supreme Court of Texas remanded these causes to this court, we set Appellant’s 

amended brief due on February 17, 2023. Before the due date, Appellant filed a motion to abate 

this appeal for court-ordered mediation, or in the alternative, a motion for a thirty-day extension 

of time to file the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). 

Appellees oppose Appellant’s motion.

Appellant’s motion to abate these appeals for court-ordered mediation is DENIED. 

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the amended brief is GRANTED. The brief is 

due on March 20, 2023. See id.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of February, 2023.

FILE COPY
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.757 Safety Zones; Ports of Ponce, Tallaboa, and Guayanilla, Puerto Rico and Limetree Bay, St. Croix, U.S.V.I. ( a ) *Location.* The following areas are established as a safety zones during the specified conditions: ( 1 ) *Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico.* A 100-yard radius surrounding all Liquefied Hazardous Gas (LHG) vessels with product aboard while transiting north of Latitude 17°57.0′ N in the waters of the Caribbean Sea on approach to or departing from the Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico (NAD 83). The safety zone remains in effect until the LHG vessel is docked.
( 2 ) *Port of Tallaboa, Puerto Rico.* A 100-yard radius surrounding all Liquefied Hazardous Gas (LHG) vessels with product aboard while transiting north of Latitude 17°56.0′ N in the waters of the Caribbean Sea on approach to or departing from the Port of Tallaboa, Puerto Rico (NAD 83). The safety zone remains in effect until the LHG vessel is docked.
( 3 ) *Port of Guayanilla, Puerto Rico.* A 100-yard radius surrounding all Liquefied Hazardous Gas (LHG) vessels around with product aboard while transiting north of Latitude 17°57.0′ N in the waters of the Caribbean Sea on approach to or departing from the Port of Guayanilla, Puerto Rico (NAD 83). The safety zone remains in effect until the LHG vessel is docked.
( 4 ) *Port of Limetree Bay, St. Croix, U.S.V.I.* A 100-yard radius surrounding all Liquefied Hazardous Gas (LHG) vessels with product aboard while transiting north of Latitude 17°39.0′ N in the waters of the Caribbean Sea on approach to or departing from the Port of Limetree Bay, U.S.V.I. (NAD 83). The safety zone remains in effect until the LHG vessel is docked.
( b ) *Regulations.* In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, anchoring, mooring or transiting in these zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port. Coast Guard Sector San Juan will notify the maritime community of periods during which these safety zones will be in effect by providing advance notice of scheduled arrivals and departures on LHG carriers via a broadcast notice to mariners on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
[COTP San Juan 02-038, 67 FR 60867, Sept. 27, 2002, as amended by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35017, June 19, 2008]
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  AMS-Based Contracting

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/AMS-Based Contracting AMS-Based ContractingADR2022-02-18T15:17:29-05:00
			
			AMS-Based ContractingIn 1996, the Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) began using the Acquisition Management System (AMS) rather than the FAR.  The AMS has its statutory roots in 49 USC 40110(d), which expressly exempts the FAA from the Competition in Contracting Act, the Small Business Act, the FAR, and related statutes. *Id*. at 40110(d)(2).  Particularly important to this guide is the statutory requirement that the AMS must provide for “the resolution of bid protests and contract disputes . . . using consensual alternative dispute resolution techniques to the maximum extent practicable.”  *Id.* at 40110(d)(1)(B).
Significant differences between the FAR and the AMS include:
The AMS is a policy that governs the internal administration of the FAA rather than a regulation.
The AMS relies heavily on the proper exercise of discretion by contracting personnel.
The AMS provides for essentially two methods of competitive procurement, i.e., “complex and noncommercial source selection,” and “commercial and simplified source selection.”  *See* AMS Policy 3.2.2.3 and 3.2.2.5, respectively.
Protests, disputes, and size challenges are under the jurisdiction of the Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition (ODRA) rather than the GAO, a board of contract appeals, or the Small Business Administration.There are also similarities between the AMS and the FAR.  For example, many clauses in AMS contracts are very similar to FAR clauses.  When the underlying AMS policies or clauses are similar to corresponding FAR requirements, the FAA ODRA will consider the decisions of other forums as persuasive, but not binding. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 829 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 24 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### G. Keith Noles **Date**

**Branch Manager Date**
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22787-SCOLA/GOODMAN

LIORA SAMANDAROVA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HOOKAH EXOTIX LLC, JEANCHRISTOPHE PITTMAN, AND 

ALEXANDRE ARKHIPOV,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE HER MOTION FOR DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, Liora Samandarova, through her undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 12, Local Rule 7.1, and other applicable Rules and laws, request the Court to grant an 

extension of time to file her Motion for Default Judgment based the following good cause:

1. The Court entered its Order on January 24, 2023, requiring that Plaintiff file her 

Motion for Default Judgment on or before February 7, 2023.

2. On that same day, the Honorable Beth Bloom scheduled the undersigned counsel 

for trial commencing on January 30, 2023. 

3. The undersigned law firm thereafter focused on preparing for the trial of an FMLA 

case in Monzon Cejas v. Downrite Engineering Corp., 1:21-CV-23556-BLOOM, for the remainder of 

the week and into the weekend.

4. The jury returned its verdict in the Monzon Cejas case on the afternoon of January 

31, 2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

5. Due to the press of business and commitments in other matters, the undersigned 

could not obtain and prepare the necessary documentation to file its Motion for Default Judgment 

by February 7, 2023.

6. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) “When an act may or must be done within a 

specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or notice 

if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires.”

7. This Court has the power to “control the disposition of the causes on its docket with 

economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel and for litigants.” Landis v. North American Co., 299 

U.S. 248, 254 (1936); also see Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706-707 (1997).

8. Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to grant her a two-week

extension of time through February 21, 2021, to file her Motion for Default Judgment.

WHEREFORE Plaintiff, Liora Samandarova, respectfully request the Court to grant her

the Extension of Time requested above. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on this 7th

day of February 2023 through filing in CM/ECF, and by email on Defendant, Alexandre 

Arkhipov, pro se, by email at bonamicoalex@gmail.com, 8028 N.W. 11th Ave., A, Miami, FL 

33150.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 2 of 2
Unassociated Document


 

RELEASE


 


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Fouad Dasuka, (“Dasuka”), for good and valuable consideration, including but not limited to the consummation of a share purchase agreement between Dasuka and Marlon Liam in respect to the sale of shares of Net Profits Ten Inc. (“NET PROFITS”), the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, agrees as follows:


 


1. Dasuka hereby remises, releases and forever discharges NET PROFITS and its assigns, employees and servants, and, where applicable, the executors, administrators, successors and assigns from any and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, claims, demands and obligations whatsoever, at law or in equity, which Dasuka may have had or now have or which her assigns, receivers, receiver-managers, trustees, affiliates, and, where applicable, the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of his hereafter can, shall or may have existing up to the present time by reason of any matter cause or thing whatsoever relating to or arising out of the relationship between the Dasuka and NET PROFITS relating to, arising out of or in connection with any and all dealings between the parties to the date hereof.


 


2. Notwithstanding the above provision and for greater clarification, this Release does not apply to any claims that may arise after the date of this Release.


 


3. It is understood and agreed that Dasuka shall not commence or continue any claims or proceedings against anyone in respect of anything hereby released which may result in a claim or proceedings against NET PROFITS.  If any such claim or proceeding results in any claim or proceeding against NET PROFITS, then the party bringing such claim or proceeding shall indemnify and save harmless the other party from all resulting liabilities, obligations and costs.


 


4. Dasuka hereby represents that he is the only party entitled to the consideration expressed in this Release, and has not assigned any right of action released hereby to any other firm, corporation or person.


 


5. Dasuka acknowledges that he has read this document and fully understands the terms of this Release, and acknowledges that this Release has been executed voluntarily after either receiving independent legal advice, or having been advised to obtain independent legal advice and having elected not to do so.


 


6. This Release is governed by the laws of Nevada, and the parties attorn to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Nevada with regard to any dispute arising out of this Release.


 


7. Execution and delivery of this document by fax shall constitute effective execution and delivery. Execution of this document by a corporation shall be effective notwithstanding that its corporate seal is not affixed hereto.







DATED for reference this 28th day of June, 2012.









/s/ Fouad Dasuka___________________


Fouad Dasuka
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 478 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘World Water Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. KERRY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘World Water Day’’. 

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly, via resolution, has designated March 22 of each year as World 

Water Day; 

Whereas a person needs 4 to 5 liters of water per day to survive; 

Whereas a person can live weeks without food, but only days 

without water; 

Whereas every 15 seconds a child dies from a water-borne 

disease; 

Whereas, for children under age 5, water-borne diseases are 

the leading cause of death; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 478 IS 

Whereas millions of women and children spend several hours 

a day collecting water from distant, often polluted 

sources; 

Whereas every dollar spent on water and sanitation saves on 

average $9 in costs averted and productivity gained; 

Whereas, at any given time, 1⁄2 of the world’s hospital beds 

are occupied by patients suffering from a water-borne 

disease; 

Whereas 88 percent of all diseases are caused by unsafe 

drinking water, inadequate sanitation, and poor hygiene; 

Whereas 1,100,000,000 (1 in 6) people lack access to an improved water supply; 

Whereas 2,600,000,000 people in the world lack access to improved sanitation; 

Whereas the global celebration of World Water Day is an initiative that grew out of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro; 

Whereas the participants in the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, including the 

United States, agreed to the Plan of Implementation 

which included an agreement to work to reduce by 1⁄2

from the baseline year 1990 ‘‘the proportion of people 

who are unable to reach or to afford safe drinking 

water’’, ‘‘and the proportion of people without access to 

basic sanitation’’ by 2015; and 

Whereas Congress passed and the President signed into law 

the Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005 

(Public Law 109–121), which was intended to ‘‘elevate 

the role of water and sanitation policy in the development 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 478 IS 

of U.S. foreign policy and improve the effectiveness of 

U.S. official programs’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘World 

3 Water Day’’; 

4 (2) urges an increased effort and the invest5 ment of greater resources by the Department of 

6 State, the United States Agency for International 

7 Development, and all relevant Federal departments 

8 and agencies toward providing sustainable and equi9 table access to safe drinking water and sanitation 

10 for the poor and the very poor; and 

11 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to observe the week with appropriate activities that 

13 promote awareness of the importance of access to 

14 clean water. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.

IntheM atleroftheSearchof

M ar-a-Lago

1100S.OceanBlvd.

Palm Beach,FL 33480

/

ORDER

I'HIS CAUSE isbeforetheCourtuponM ovantDonaldJ.Tnlmp'sM otion ForJudicial

OversightAnd AdditionalRelief.TheCourthaving reviewedtheM otion andany opposition

thereto,andbeingotherwisefully advised,itishereby:

ORDERED thattheM otionisGRANTED;anditisflzrther

ORDERED that:

(a)A SpecialMastershallbeappointed in thismattertoreview allmaterialsseized

pursuanttotheSearchW arantsignedonAugust5,2022,forexecutionatthepremises

listedabove;

(b)TheGovemmentisenjoinedfrom furtherreview ofthosematerialstmdlsuchtimems

aSpecialM msterisappointed;

(c)The Govemmentshallprovide M ovantn,1t.11a sum ciently detailed Receiptfor

Property,statingwithspecificityeachitem seizedptzrsuanttotheSearchW arant,and

wherethatitem waslocatedatthetimeofseizure;and

(d)'l'heGovemmentshallpromptlyrettu'nanyitem seizedthatwasnotwithinthescope

oftheSearchW arrant.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED inChambersat . - - - - - - - - ,Floridw this

day of .2022.

UnitedStatesDistrictJudge

Copiesfurnishedto:AllCounselofRecord

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 2 of 2