alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1(c)

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF


                          GLOBAL ASSET HOLDINGS, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 (present name)


                                  #P94000045741
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Document Number of Corporation (If known)

Pursuant to the provisions of section 607.1006, Florida Statutes, this Florida
profit corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to its articles
of incorporation;


FIRST: Amendment adopted: ARTICLE 1, name of corporation, has been amended to
reflect the change of the corporate name.

The name of the corporation shall now be: EPIXTAR CORP.

SECOND: The date of adoption for this Amendment is: November 21,2002.

THIRD: Adoption of Amendments

          *The Amendment was approved by the shareholders and the number of
           votes cast for the amendment by the shareholders was sufficient for
           approval.


                     Signed this 21st day of November, 2002.

Signature /s/ William Rhodes, Jr.
         ---------------------------------------------
          William Rhodes, Jr., President and Director

<PAGE>

                               [STATE OF FLORIDA]

                             [DEPARTMENT OF STATE]

I certify from the records of this office that EPIXTAR CORP., is a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on June 15, 1994.

The document number of this corporation is P94000045741.

I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office
through December 31, 2002, that its most recent annual report/uniform business
report was filed on February 12, 2002, and its status is active.

I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution.



                                                     Given under my hand and the
                                              Great Seal of the State of Florida
                                           at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the
                                                    Third day of December, 2002


[GREAT SEAL OF                                         /s/ Jim Smith
 THE STATE OF FLORIDA]                                     Jim Smith
                                                      Secretary of State
§ 110.194a Mobile Bay, Ala., and Mississippi Sound, Miss. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds.* ( 1 ) The waters of lower Mobile Bay, near Cedar Point, within an area bounded on the north by latitude 30°21′00′′, on the east by longitude 88°05′00′′, on the south by latitude 30°20′00′′, and on the west by longitude 88°06′00′′.
( 2 ) The waters of Mississippi Sound, south of Biloxi, within an area bounded on the north by latitude 30°20′00′′, on the east by longitude 88°54′00′′, on the south by latitude 30°19′00′′, and on the west by longitude 88°55′00′′.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The anchorages are exclusively for the use of unmanned barges, canal boats, scows, and other nondescript vessels. Such craft shall be so anchored that they will not at any time extend outside the limits of the anchorages.
( 2 ) In emergencies or whenever maritime or commercial interests of the United States so require, the Captain of the Port is authorized to shift the position of any craft in the anchorages.
( 3 ) Whenever in the opinion of the Captain of the Port, such action may be necessary, any or all craft in these anchorages may be required to be moored with two or more anchors.
( 4 ) No vessel shall be navigated within the anchorages at a speed exceeding six knots.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of RTI Biologics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian K. Hutchison, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and
for, the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2010



/s/ Brian K. HutchisonName:

Brian K. HutchisonTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to RTI Biologics, Inc. and will be retained by RTI Biologics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.8



AMENDMENT TO 
THE SPROUT SOCIAL, INC. 
2016 STOCK PLAN
Sprout Social, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), by (i) duly adopted resolution of its Board of Directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Sprout Social, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) and (ii) duly adopted consent of the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan, hereby amends the Plan pursuant to this Amendment to the Sprout Social, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan (this “Amendment”) as follows, effective December 11, 2018:
1.The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Subject to adjustments as provided in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 5,467,862 and shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any combination thereof.”
2.    The first sentence of Section 5.3(a) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Subject to Section 4.1 and adjustment as provided in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed 5,467,862 shares (the “ISO Share Limit”).”
This Amendment, in conjunction with the Plan, constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all oral and written agreements and understandings made and entered into prior to the date hereof.  In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail and control.  If any term or provision of this Amendment or the application thereof to any persons or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Amendment or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Amendment shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(signature page follows)








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the date first written above on behalf of the Company.
	
		
	SPROUT SOCIAL, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/Justyn Howard

	 
	Justyn Howard

	 
	President

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 






[Signature Page to Stock Plan Amendment]
EXHIBIT 32.0
  CERTIFICATES
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    1)
    The Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010, filed on
    the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.      By:
    /s/  ROBERT
    E. CONWAY        By:
    /s/  R.
    MICHAEL CARRUTHERS
#### Campbell *v.*The State.

Submitted December 17, 1906.

Decided January 16, 1907.

Beck, J.

There was no evidence in this ease to authorize the jury to find that the defendant was guilty of any criminal intent when he committed the alleged acts of trespass. While ordinarily this intent would be presumed from the act itself, where nothing more appeared, yet when it affirmatively appears that the defendant was a coterminous landiowner, who crossed over an obscure land line and cut down a few -trees on the other side, a part of the trees cut at the same time being' on his own land, and the prosecutor himself admits that he did not know where the true line was, and, according to the statement of the defendant, which was not denied by the prosecutor, the latter also crossed over the disputed line and posted certain notices on trees growing on the defendant’s side, the presumption of criminal intent is rebutted, and there can be no conviction. *Shrouder*v. *State,*121 *Ga.*615.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G: J., absent.*

*308Indictment for trespass. Before Judge Gober. Milton superior court. November *7,*1906.

*Griffin & Attaway,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. F. Simpson, solicitor-general,*contra.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 07/1/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Clean Power Plan Discussion with the State of Wyoming held on 06/20/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA Headquarters and Region 8 staff discussed various questions regarding the proposed Clean Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants on 06/20/2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was 

proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA HQ: Brian Fisher, Kevin Culligan, Joe Bryson and Jan Cortelyou.

EPA Region 8: Carl Daly and Laura Farris

Wyoming PUC: Al Minier and Marci Norby

Wyoming DEQ: Steve Dietrich and Melissa Miels

ATTACHMENTS

Discussion Questions
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4809 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4809

                For the relief of Thomas J. Sansone, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2000

  Mrs. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Thomas J. Sansone, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR VACCINE-RELATED
              INJURY.

    (a) Cause of Injury.--In consideration of the petition filed under 
subtitle 2 of title XXI of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-10 et seq.) (relating to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 
Program) by the legal representatives of Thomas J. Sansone, Jr., 
including the claims contained in that petition that the injury 
described in that petition was caused by a vaccine covered in the 
Vaccine Injury Table specified in section 2114 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-14) and given on June 1, 1994, such injury is deemed to have been 
caused by such vaccine for the purposes of subtitle 2 of title XXI of 
such Act.
    (b) Payment.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall pay 
compensation to Thomas J. Sansone, Jr. for the injury referred to in 
subsection (a) in accordance with section 2115 of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa-15).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1


FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


The Trans World Entertainment Corporation
Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective July 12, 2012:


Paragraph A of Article 7 of the Plan is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:


“A. Normal Retirement Benefit


 


Except as set forth in the following
sentence of this Article 7.A., the annual Normal Retirement Benefit for each Participant shall be equal to 50% of the average of
the participant’s base compensation for the five years prior to retirement (“base benefit”) plus the average
of the three largest bonus payments for the last five years prior to retirement (“bonus benefit”), to the extent vested.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the annual Normal Retirement Benefit for Robert J. Higgins shall be $950,000. Each Participant’s
annual Normal Retirement Benefit shall be payable in equal monthly installments for a period of 20 years, beginning, subject to
Article 19 below, on the later of (i) the first business day of the month following the Participant’s attainment of Normal
Retirement Age (65), or (ii) the first business day of the month following the Participant’s termination of employment with
the Company. To receive the bonus benefit a Participant must be employed until Normal Retirement Age.”
#### § 183.110 Definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart:

*Bilge* means the area in the boat, below a height of 4 inches measured from the lowest point in the boat where liquid can collect when the boat is in its static floating position, except engine rooms.

*Connected* means allowing a flow of water in excess of one-quarter ounce per hour from the engine room bilge into any other compartment with a 12 inch head of water on the engine room side of the bulkhead.

*Engine room bilge* means the area in the engine room or a connected compartment below a height of 12 inches measured from the lowest point where liquid can collect in these compartments when the boat is in its static floating position.

*Engine room* means the compartment where a permanently installed gasoline or diesel engine is installed, including connected compartments.

*Open to atmosphere* means a compartment that has at least 15 square inches of open area directly exposed to the atmosphere for each cubic foot of net compartment volume.

*Sealed compartment* means an enclosure that can resist an exterior water level of 12 inches without seepage of more than one-quarter fluid ounce per hour.

[CGD 77-145, 43 FR 56858, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 82-010, 48 FR 8273, Feb. 28, 1983; CGD 85-098, 52 FR 19728, May 27, 1987; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33670, June 28, 1996; USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67176, Dec. 1, 1999]
Skip to content. |  Skip to navigation

            Advanced Search...        

##### Personal tools

You	are here:Home			→					Reference					→									Research Papers					→									Survival Research Project Paper (PDF)

Home Contact RSS Privacy Policy FOIA No Fear Act FAQs Electronic Learning Portal USA.gov DHS				FLETC: 1131 Chapel Crossing Road, Glynco, GA 31524				Phone (912) 267-2100
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ODRA Early Neutral Evaluation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iUlxiRuRL5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/11-odra-ene\/\">ODRA Early Neutral Evaluation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/11-odra-ene\/embed\/#?secret=iUlxiRuRL5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ODRA Early Neutral Evaluation” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"iUlxiRuRL5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
City of Memphis Code Section 16-98 Reporting Requirements

(a) Except as provided below, each permitted stationary air pollution source must submit to the Department an annual 

report that establishes the amount of actual emissions of each regulated pollutant, including carbon monoxide, for 

that source. This report will be for the emissions of that source that occurred during the calendar year starting in 

1991 and continuing for succeeding years thereafter. The Department may request, and the air pollution source 

shall provide, additional information on the emissions data submitted when the Department determines, the data 

previously provided is inadequate to establish the actual type or amount of emissions from the source subject to 

fees.

(b) Not including air toxics as they are defined in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the amendments 

thereto, if the source emits fewer than twenty five (25) tons of actual emissions of pollutant during a year, it may at 

its option, use as the actual emissions figure, its permitted pollutant levels where available and known. If the 

source is a "major source" under the air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 it too must 

calculate its actual emission of regulated pollutants. Failure to provide, on a timely basis, any additional 

information requested shall be considered failure to pay the fees.

(Ord. No. 4105, effective July 1, 1992, amended by Ord No. 4320, adopted 5-2-95, effective 6-7-95.)

1698, p. 1
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

November 1, 2009

 

Alexander’s, Inc.

Paramus, New Jersey

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated November 1, 2009, (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the new accounting guidance on the accounting for noncontrolling interest);**because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our reports referred to above, which were included in your Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements of Alexander’s, Inc.:

 

Registration Statement No. 333-151721 on Form S-8

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-155727 on Form S-3

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
§ 175.25 Enforcement of State requirements for children to wear personal flotation devices. ( a ) This section applies to operators of recreational vessels on waters subject to the jurisdiction of any State that has established by statute a requirement for children of a certain age to wear an appropriate PFD approved by the Coast Guard, while aboard a recreational vessel.
( b ) If the applicable State statute establishes any requirement for children of a certain age to wear an appropriate PFD approved by the Coast Guard, then that requirement applies on the waters subject to the State's jurisdiction instead of the requirement provided in § 175.15(c) of this part.
[USCG-2000-8589, 69 FR 45591, July 30, 2004]
-cr-06239-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.336 What are the requirements for lifejackets? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each unmanned deepwater port must have at least one lifejacket complying with § 149.316 of this part for each person on the deepwater port. The lifejackets need to be available for use on the deepwater port only when persons are onboard.
( b ) During helicopter visits, personnel who have aircraft type of lifejackets may use them as an alternative to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39179, July 1, 2013]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-CIV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA, 

CARLOS LOPEZ, 

MARIANA LOPEZ, and 

RAFAELA VALIENTE, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE, INC., 

REINIER CORTES, and 

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO, 

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

MEDIATOR’S REPORT

The parties held a mediation conference on February 22, 2023, and the results of that 

conference are indicated below: 

Attendance: All parties and their counsel appeared via Zoom.

Outcome: No agreement was reached; IMPASSE

Dated this 22nd day of February, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

Neil Flaxman, Esq.

Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit & Appellate Mediator

L.R. 16.2 Certified Dist. Ct. Mediator (S.D. Fla.)

L.R. 4.02 Certified Dist. Ct. Mediator (M.D. Fla.)

Brickell City Tower, Suite 3100

80 Southwest 8th Street

Miami, Florida 33130

Tel: 305-810-2786- Fax: 305-810-2824

E-mail: neil@flaxmanmediations.com

By: s/ Neil Flaxman

Neil Flaxman, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 025299

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2023 Page 1 of 1