o lsTRlcT CO URT FO R THE

sowuvE.STlPtAxLoMlssTEmAcu'roFlvalsololtxmA/-s/urosy

o*nw.

DONALD J SEP 122g22

. 'lRIJM P,

tjjltA,...vjt,ç No.9:22-a-8129 iD.o:éJk.

D

- c Plaint# s as.

V -

Dated:September12,2022

U N ITED STA TESOF AM ERICA,

JURYTIUALDEMANDED

Defendant

IN 'I'H t U N ITED STATES

M OVANT-INTERVENOR (PRO SEI-RM K.PATEL'SAM EN DED REPLY TO

D EFEN D AN T'S RESPON SE AT D K T,48O R RESPON SE TO

D/FCNDANT'SM OTION XTDKT.69

1,T.E.,T.EIIAJK.PATEL,theundersigned m ovant-intervenorpros% in theabovenamedcase,with apendingm otionatDkt.36,herebysubm itthisam ended replytoDefendant-unitedStatesofAm erica'sResponseatDkt.48,wltichiswrittentobeanaddidon

toDkt.60(duplicatefilingatDkt.61),orasmyresponsetoDefendant'sM odonatDkt.

69.L.R.7.1(c)(2)(10pages,gontandback).

W HEREAR,''AttomeyGeneralBrewsterexplainedmoTeth> acenturyago,'gilhere

arehvokindsofoffidalterzns'...onekind of'term 'refeTstoaperiodofpersonalservice.

In thatcmsez'theterm isappurtenantto theperson'...Anotherkind of'term 'refersto

aflxedslotoftimetowhichindividualappointeesareassir ed.---lhere,'thepersonisappurtenanttotheterm '...In otherwords,a'term ofoG ce'caneitherrlznw1t11theperson

orM tIZthecalendar/'UnitedStatesv.Wilson,290F.3dM 7,353(D.C.Cir.2002)(quoting

Comm'rsoftheDisf.ofColumbia,170p.At/yGen.@6,476-79(1882))9and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 1 of 17
W HEREAR,theSuprem eCou/ hasemphasizedthatprivilegeclaimq,''m ustbeconsideredinlightofottrbistoriccommie enttotheruleoflaw''and''ltlheneedtodevelop

allrelevantfac'tsintheadversarysystem z''Nixon,418U.S.at708-09& Dkt.69at% and,

WI- EAS,''Iiln theperformanceofassigned consdhtionalduties,(Executive

branchloftheGovernmentmustinidally interprettheConsdtudon,and...-fhePresidenrscotmsel,mswehavenoted,readstheCorusdtution msprovidinganabsoluteprivilegeofconfidendalityfora11Presidendalcomm lanicatiotw ''Nixon,418U.S.at703% 28

U.S.C.j516,& seegeneralyDavidA.Skauss,''PresidendalInterpretadonoftheConsdtudon/'15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-135(1993)1;and,

W I-IEREAG,in otherw ords,''execudvebranch m ustinterprettheConsdtudonbeforeitcandeddewhattodow''seegenerallyStrauss,15CardozoL.Rev.at113-1359and,

W I.IEItEAs,theSupremeCourthas''rejectledltheargumentthatonlyaninclmbent

Presidentmayassert''separadon-of-powersclaimq,Nixonv.Adm'rofGcn.Servs.,43317.5.

425,439(1977);and,

W HEREAG,thereisan internalseparadon ofpowersoninterpredngtheConsdtudonwithintheExecudveBranch;and,

W HEREAR,privilegeand im mtmidesmaybeusedtosustain separadon ofpowers

insidebranchesofgovernm entandacossgovernmentstm dertheUnited StatesConsdtudon;and,

W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDepar% entofStateisresponsibleforinterpretingand

elaboraM gonthePrivilegesandImmlmidesClause,U.S.const.ax't.lV,@2;

1.DavidA.Skauss,''PresiderdalIntezw etationoftheConsdttzdoa''15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-

135 (1993), htps://chcagoc bound.uA cago.edu/cp'/dewcontent.cp'?referer=&h% sreo =l&ardcleceoo6&contextcjotu'nalartidesipresidendal.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 2 of 17
%

W HEREAG,theUnitedStatesDeparfm entofStateshowsitselaboradononthePrivilegesand Im mllnidesClausein theUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedencebytheOfficeof

the ChiefofProtocol,h% s:/pwww.state.gov/o -content/uploads/zor /oz/uNtedStates-order-of-precedence-Feb- e -zozz.pdf(revisedFeb.11,2022)& U.S.corust.art.

W ,b2;and,

W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDeparhnentofJusdce,theAttomeyGeneral,orU.S.

Atlom eyJuanGonzales,didnotfolow theUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedencedulyestablishedbytheOfficeoftheChiefofProtocol,1#.;and,

W HEREAG,theincnmbentPresidentoftheUnitedStateshassupportedtheUnited

StatesOrderofPrecedencehousedbytheUnitedStatesDepnrfmentofStateOfficeofthe

ChiefofProtocol,w hichshow sthatform erPresidentTrllmp outrnnkqincllmbentAttorneyGeneralM erric.kGarland,Id.& 3U.S.C.55301etseq.;and,

W HEREAS,thus,theUnited StatesDepare entofStateand theUnited StatesDeparM entofJusdceareadversariesinotlrsystem ofruleoflaw,inordertoGeateaseparadonofpowersandchecksandbalance,butcf.DoetrineofComitpU.S.const.art.lV,j

2,& 28U.S.C.j5169and,

W HEREAS,theincllmbentPresidentoftheUnitedStateshasnotcleared,norm ay

ratifyunconstimtionalactstomakethem constitutional/breachofprotocol;and,

W HEREAS,theexecudveDeparM entsand itsHeadshavebeen ceated and appointedbythePresident,w1).11adviceandconsent9om theSenate,Freytagv.Comm'r,501

2.Underthecommonlaw,theincumbentKingmaychangeprotocolat-willagainstaformer

HeadofStateoraprecedingMonarch;thosevestedpowersareembeddedintheUnitedStatesCorkstitudon andrem ain constantUIZEIlaw fully am ended.Besides,asthecom plaintand Attom eyGeneral'sM errickGarland'spublic,apolitical,andlegalcommentsshow,currently,onlyaunitofanExecudvebranch

hasacted,Le.theDepartmentofJustice-F.B.l.rrathert1= theExecudvebranc.haswhole.Dkt.1at10.To

nosurprise,evenagainstaformerpresident,m ordertolegallycondidonthepeacefultrarlsitionof

power,theExecudvepowerismuchweakerth= ofacommonlaw King's.UnitedStatesv.Providence

Jolfr-!Co.,485U.S.693,701(1988)(moreth= one''UnitedStates''is''startling''l.

4

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 3 of 17
U.S.868,886,917(1991)(discussingHeadsandprindpalofscersoftheexecudvedepartments);and,

W HU EAS,theExecudveBranch's''interpretadonofitsIown)powers...isduegreat

respec'tfrom theothersz''Nixon,418U.S.at703-49and,

W HFREAS,,'(a11)powersof1aw enforcement...areassignedunderourConsdtudon

totheExecudveandtheJudidarp''Quinnv.UnitedStates,349U.S.155,161(1955).

THEREFORE,onlyalznitoftheExecutiveBranch,thecurrentAttom eyGeneral,has

broughtchargesagainstformerPresidentTrumpinviolationoftheinter-workingsofthe

execudvebranchprotocol,orderedbytheincumbentPresidentBiden,ashousedbyPresidentBiden'ssubordinates,whoarealsoeithertheAtlom ey General'ssuperiorsorcoequalsonthesubject-matter,intheUrtitedStatesDeparM entofState.

FURTHERMORE,thePresident,thecourts,ortheExecudveBranchcnnnotm utedistincdonsofoffice,person,state,andgovernm ent,astheyareanelaboradonoftheUnited

StatesConstitudon Privilegesand lm mtm idesClause,which laysoutthes% ctureand

lanesofenforcem ent.

WHEREAR,inorderforafederaldiskictcourtof1aw tohavepersonaljurisdicdon,

underFed.R.Civ.12(b)(2),kaditionalnodorusof''naturaljusdce,''''fairplap''and''substandaljustice''mustatalltimenotbeviolated,M cDonaldv.M abee,243U.S.90,92(1917),

JointAnti-FascistComm.v.M cGrath,341U.S.123,123(1951),Breithauptr.Abram,352U.S.

432,435(1957)(shocktheconscience,iraditionalnodonsoffairplayanddecencp indida

ofnotapeacefultrnnsidon ofpowercausedbyDefendant-Dolisavioladonoftheconsdence),Gonzalesv.UnitedStates,348U.S.407,412(1955)Cunderlyingconceptsofproceduralregularityandbasicfairplay''),Int'1ShoeCo.p.Washington,326U.S.310,324&

326(1945),UnitedStatesv.Lovasco,431U.S.783,796(1977)(dueprocessembodies''fundamentalconcepdonsofjusdce''and''thecommllnity'ssenseoffairplayanddecencf')

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 4 of 17
(seeFederalist77,UnitedStatesasacommllnity),Cnty.ofSacramentov.Lczis,523U.S.

833,847(1998)(consdence-shoddngbehavioris''so'brutal'and'offensive'thatit(doesl

notcomportw1t11kadidonalideasoffairplayanddecency.'')(abuseofexecutivepower)

(decenciesof''civilized conductz''epitomized inU.S.const.al't.lV,j2)(bowing and

curtsyamongstandtostateactorsortheefec'tinou.rcommllnity),& Sessionsv.Dimaya,

138S.Ct.1204,1212(2018)(requiredbyboth''ordinarynodonsoffairplayandthesettled

rulesoflaw.'');nnd,

W HEREAS,tradidonalnotionsofnaturaljusdcestatesaformerT.H.(T.E.)President

oftheUnitedStates(T.E.PresidentoftheUnitedStatesforalldocumentsforeignaffairs),

from theNaturalState,ismorefitth> thecurrentcolzrt(judgeandDefendant)andthe

N aturalOrderdem andsthattheincumbentAttom ey Generalyieldtopressingcharges

againstPlaintiff,otlrform erH ead ofState,seeU nited StatesO rderofPrecedence-united

StatesDep'tofState-ofSceoftheChiefofProtocol,U.S.const.art.IW j2,& Dkt.60at2,

5,5n.3,& 7;and,

WT- TIAS,kaditionalnodorusofbmsicfairplayandsubstandaljusdcehavebeen

violated,seee.g.Obergefelv.Hodges,576U.S.644,742(2015)(harshtreatmentisnotfair

play)(gaysandlesbianshavebeendeniedtheNaturalOrder,pursuanttotheirachievem entsin dvilsodetp asthew ealtbiestcom mllnitp pnrticularly,gaym en,intheUnited

States;thesam eillnesshasentered stateand governm entalinsdtudons,prevene gthe

NaturalOrder,includingingoverningtheDefendant'sdecisions)(Plaintiffhasbeendenied rightflllplacein theafterm ath ofhishonor'sincumbency asPresidentofUnited

Statesp& Pet.forW ritofCext*58-9,Patelv.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202-)9and,

3.https:/ye c-prod-requests.s3-us-west-z.a azonaws.com /W age-Gap-AppO o .pdf.

6

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 5 of 17
W T- EAS,even w1t11explidtirtform ed consentthePlaintiffcannotavailhim self

beforethiscoM becausehisavailmentcannotovercom ethevioladontraditionalnodons

offairplap naturaljusdce,andsubstandaljusdceasappliedtothecotzrtandanypossible

rulingbytlziscotlrt,U.S.const.art.lV,j2& seealsoUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedenceUnitedStatesDep'tofState-officeoftheChiefofProtocol;and,

W T- EAR,thkscourtcannotattachpersonaljurisdidiontothePlaino asitwotld

violatethetraditionalnotionsoffairplay,nahtraljusdce,and substantialjustice,and,

thus,itsopinionw otlldonlybeadvisory;and,

W HEREAG,inaddidon,thecorollarytoPlaintiff'sformerPresidendalprivilege,im -

mllnitp isthecouTt'slimitedjudidalreview,Federalist78,U.S.const.art.1V,j2,az't.IEI

(originalintent),& nmend.V.M arburyv.Madison,5U.S.137(1803).

THEREFORE,tltisCotrtshotlddismisssuasw afclmderFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2),as

theCotlrtdoesnothavepersonaljurisdidionforPlaintiff,orFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6),for

failttretostateaclnim uponwhichreliefcanbeg'ranted,msthereksnoenforcementmechanism torequirethePlaintiff,theformerHeadofStateandform erPresident,whoisalso

Privileged,pertheNaturalState,andislmm une,pertheNaturalStatetoo;thedesdendescan onlybecuredbynew cltargesbroughtdirectlyby theincllmbentPresident,by

hisown counselop rathert14= theinmlmbentAttom eyGeneral.

FURTHERMORE,thenodonsofnaturaljustke,fairplay,andsubstandaljusdcebuttresscastledoctrine,asgenerally applied,andPlaindff'scastlecantmiquelp alongw 1t11

thepastPresidents,can withstand allforcesexceptthose directly and consdtudonally

com m andedbytheinclzm bentPresident,e.g.UnitedStatesSecretServiceorUnitedStates

Arm ed and SpaceForce.SeeD kt.60at2,5,5n.3,& 7.

UNDERFED.R.Clv.P.Z4,Ihaveacomm on quesfonof1aw orfactorinterestinthe

transacdonbecauseafavorablerulingtotheDefendantcan violatem yExcellendes,the

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 6 of 17
style/titles,and my careerand statesmanshipby extension oftlaisnling am ongst1icertsed Govem m entalactors,local,state,federal,and intem adonal,whom ightsympatlaizew1t14thisCourtunconsdtutionally.

W HEREAS,theSuprem eCourthasheld thataform erPresidentmay notsuccesshllly assertexecudveprivilegeagainstreview by ''theveryExecudveBranch in whose

nam etheprivilegeisinvoked/'Nixon,433U.S.at447-48& Dkt69at8;4and,

W HEREAS,execudvePrivilegeand execudvelm m tm ity are collieries,butdistinct

concepts,U.S.const.art.IV j2& nmend.XIV,j1,c1.29and,

W HEREAS,asserdngonenecessarilyimputestheasseo onoftheother,1#.9and,

W HEREAG,form erUnited StatesPresidentTnlmp m ay assertexecudveIm munity

from Urtited StatesGovernm entalforcewhichisnottm derthecom m and oftheincllm -

bentUnited StatesPresident,Id.;and,

W HFRKAS,inthehappeningsrelatedtoNixon,433U.S.at425,incum bentPresident

GeraldFordwasinHmatelyinvolvedinprosecudngformerPresidentNhon,Id.&cf.Dkt.

1at10;nnd,

W HU EAS,here,asllnlikeinthehappeningsrelated toNixon,433U.S.at425,the

incum bentPresidentisnotinHm ately involved againqtthe prosecudon ofPresident

Biden,PHH & m.r.ConsumerFinancialProtecnonBureau,839F.3dls12-13(D.C.Cir.2016)

(M adiqonianpresidendalcontrol),seeM organv.UnitedStates,304U.S.1,22(1938)(holdingthatitks''notthefunctionofthecourttoprobethementalprocessesoftheIExecw

t1vel''),andDkt.1at10;and,

4.AnF.B.I.cannotdaim execudvePrivilegeagainsttheincllmbentAtlorneyGeneral,butaformerPresidentcandnim execudvePrivilege(i.e.PresidendalPrivile<e)againstthejncllmbentAttorney

General.RespedivelyrtheindependentconceptofexecudveTmmumtyapplies,whichfavorstheformer

Presidentagainqtthem cttm bentAttom eyGenel'al.

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 7 of 17
W HEREAS,here,thetopicsofdoclAmentsarerelated to foreign policp lznlikein

Nixon,433U.S.at425,where,thedocumentswererelated todom esdcpolicy;and,

W HFIZEAG,morespedfkalyandmaterialy,aformerPresident/l-leadofStateoutrnnkstheincllmbentAttom eyGeneralinforeignrelationsanddiplom adcm atter,wltich

areexclusivelyreservedforthePresident'srecognidon,seeg-emlyProvidenceJournal,

485U.S.at701(moreth> one''UnitedStates''is''startlingvl;and,

W HEREAS,theincllmbentPresident,theUnited StatesOrderofPrecedenceduly

establishedbytheOfficeoftheChiefofProtocol,and thePresidentialRecordsActshow

thattheform erpresidentscarry on offidaldudes,wltich com ew1t14omnipresentprivilegesand imm lznides,which are absolute exceptatagainqtan incumbentPresident,

Nixon,418U.S.at703-4& Scheuerv.RhtWes,416U.S.232,239,241,244,&248,(1974)9and,

W HEREM ,theConsdtutionalpowerofexecudvePrivilegeand/orexecudve1mm llnityofaform erPresident,thus,m aybelawfllllyasserted againsttheincllmbentDeparM entofJusdce,U.S.corust.art.1V,52& nmend.XIV,j1,d.2,M urrayv.Bush,No.

06-C-0781*1(E.D.W is.Aug.31,2006)(''whethertheacdonisfrivolousormalicious,or

seeksrelieffromanimmunepcrjp,orfailstostateaclnim onwhic.hreliefmaybegranted.''l

(italicsadded)(intel'naldtadonsomitled);cf.28U.S.C.51915(e)(2)(B)(ii);Williamsv.

Holmes,No.1:17-cv-00799-KOB*1(N.D.Ala.Sep.5,2017:Malcolm v.CifyofMiami,No.

22-a-20499-K1NG/D *2,4,& 6(S.D.Fla.Mar.7,2022);&Listerv.Dl'fofTreasJfng,408F.3d1309(101 Cir.2005/and,

W TTEREAS,thePlaintiffcanlawfullypossessthedisputedUnitedStatesrecords,44

U.S.C.j22029and,

W HEREAR,theFed.R.Civ.P.8(c)(1)alow fortheaffirmadvedefensesofilegality

(Defendant'splay in obtainingPresidèntialRecords),licertse(U.S.const.art.lV,j2),

laches(Defendantshouldhaveactedquickeriftrulysuspidousofnadonalsecurity),or

9

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 8 of 17
tmdeanhands(DefendantshouldhaveinvolvedtheinclmbentPresidentoftheUrtited

States);and,

W Ha EAS,thisCourtisin Com ityw ithboth Plaintiffand Defendant,andhasthe

privilegeofservingeachpartyinhis/her/theirindividualcapadtp DocfrineofComitp

U.S.coztst.art.1V,52.

THEREFOREZthePlaino isimmtm e9om prosecudon9om theDefendant,andthe

Courtshouldrefazrnallrecordstoplaintiff,PresidentTrnmp,and orderchargesagainst

TheHonorableGarlandforconversion,''keason''/''waF'/''attack#''andrebellionorinsurrection.U.S.const.art.HI,j3918U.S.C.923819& ProvidenceJournal,485U.S.at701.

FURTHERMORE,tm dertheConsdtudonalSdion,which stats,atam inimlzm ,w1t11

thecorporatechaAersmendonedin theDeclaradon oflndependence(1776),thelocal,

excellentcorporationsand otherlocalauthorideshavedevolved powerto the Federal

Sovereiga m uc.h m oreth> theSisterStateshavetotheFederalSovereign;thus,theinterestin theàanqaction isachec.k on theDevolved Sovereigntp Faithfully orderedby

me,theintervenor,andasataxpayer.U.S.const.art.1% jjI-2& art.W ,519Federalist

78;&42U.S.C.j52000bbetseq.SeealsoW hiteHouseOfficeoflntergovernmentalAffairs,

https://www.whitehouse.gov/iga/.

W HFREAG,barring subordinateExecutiveBranch from reviewing and using the

classified recordsforcrim inalinvesdgatespurposesisam eaningfulway ofprotecfing

''theconfidendalityofPresidentialcom municadonsz''Nixon,418U.S.at705& contra.Dkt.

69at10;and,

W HEREAS,theTeasonsPresidentsorthecou- allow independentpersonnelacross

theIntelligenceCom mtm ity toreview thevery sam erecordsforotherdosely related

purposesbutnottherem ainderoftheExecudveBranch donothavetoberevealed in

ordertoprotectthecordidendalityofPresidendalRecords,Nixon,418U.S.at705;and,

10

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 9 of 17
W HEREAS,tedm ocratsarethepersormelacrosstheIntelligenceCommtm itywho

usuallyreceivetheserecordsandwhosenarrow objedivesarepredselycodified,lnlike

in thenot-independentExecudveBranc.h werepardsans,partym embers,form erm embersofCongress,andbureaucratswhoareaccountabletovaryinginterests,such asforeign Heads ofState and inter-governm entalorgnnizadons and thosehierarchies,are

likely toreceiveandbeexposedtheserecords;and,

W HEREAS,an afh'rmanceofthedefaultprotecdonistruleofPresidendalRecords

wilalow theRepublictoremainOneandintact,Nixon,418U.S.at705,Providencelournal,

485U .S.at701,N ixon,433U .S.at447-9,& H einv.H eedom H om Religion Found.,lnc.,551

U.S.587(2007)(Rather,theywere''createdentirelywithintheexecudvebranch...byPresidendalexecudveorder.''(quotingFreedom Hom ReligionFound.,Inc.v.Chao,433F.3d

989,997(7thCir.2006)/and,

W HEREAG,theDeparkmentofJusdceisnotanindependentagencyoftheExecudve

Branch;ands

W HEREAS,here,the''trial''isofaform erPresident,whichw asnotinidatedbythe

incllm bentPresident;and,

W HEREAS,theenforcem entofNixon,418U.S.at705isdifferentduetotheadvancem entoftechnology;and,

'rlvlte oltE,preventingtheUnitedStatesDepartmentofJusdcefrom gainingaccesstothem aterialPresidendalRecordsislawful,aswellastheappoinM entofthespecialm aster,butthePresidendalRecordsareproperlyrettunedtoPresidentTrump atthe

eadiestconvenience;ifnot,atleastacopy ofallrecords,asthePlaintiffm nintninshis

preslampdon ofcorrectnessIm IiIprovenotherwise.

FURTHERM ORE,ihiskansactioncouldextenttolocalgovem m ents,asetofDevolversofSovereigntp andinserfereM t.IAlocaljurisdidions'recordkeepingpradicesandthe

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 10 of 17
privilegesandimmlnitiesoftheiTagents,includingwhenthosejurisdidionsweredem arcatedin anotherstate.

W HVREAS,Dkt.69at10-11eqttivocatesabouttheExecudveBranclwgenerallyw 1t11

themorespecificterminologiesofexecudvePrivilegesand/orImmllnidesappliedtothe

ExecudveBranch-incum bent-presidentandExecudveBranch-former-president;and,

W HEREAS,Defendantisunpersuasivelyarguing,thatin addidontoitskespmssto

a form er President's castle,its Governm entalllnit's needs are ofm ore nationalim -

portanceth= thestatusquoestablishedby theExecutiveBrandwincumbent-president,

whichdoesnptdiscriminateagninsttheExecudveBrD G -fo= er-president-ple e f,and

m adepubliclyavailablethroughtheUnitedStatesDeparfm entofState-oG ceoftheChief

ofProtocol(whethertheExecudveBrD G -Gnlmbent-Auomey-Generi isastateac'toror

agovernmentalactoris irrelevantdue to the orderofprecedence and the Executive

Branch-incllmbent-president'sestablisbm entofthe nadonalsecurity agenda;nonetheless,thesedistinctioruscannotbemuted),Egan,484U.S.at5279seealso,e.g.,Murphy,769

Fed.Appx.at792(''Theauthoritytoprotectnadonalsemlrityinformadon fallsonthe

PresidentIdirectlyl.-l,& Dkt.69at13;and,

W HEREAS,thePresidentisan agent,in theterm softhePresidendalRecordsAd

and Federalist78;and,

W HEREAS,thecourtsmustProtectthePresidentfrom aggressionfrom llninown

som cesw itltinExectltlveBrancluwhich conclrrentlypolitically azusw ertovaryinginterests,Dkt.69at18quoting Egan,484U .S.at5299and,

W HEREAS,thecourtsm ustbesensidvetotheinter-workingsandinter-politicsof

theexecudvebrandx

12

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 11 of 17
W HbHmAszhypothedcaly,Executive BrD G -G= bent-A/omey-Generz-Doland-a lcouldhavebeendeniedaccesstoPresidentialRecordsofExecudveBranch-form er-president-Trum pbyExecutiveBrr G -Gnlmbent-president-Biden;and,

W HEREAS,therefore,thecurrenthappee gsin thecase-at-handareappeasem ent

tovitalpartsoftheGovem m entandpossiblepolidcalpardesand facdonsthePresident

mustappe%e,PHH Ccrp,839F.3dat1& 12-13(AstheSupremeCourthmsexplained,

ottrConsdtution''wasadoptedtoenablethepeopletogovem them selves,tltroughtheir

electedleadersw''andtheConsdtudon''requiresthataPresidentchosenbytheentireN adon overseetheexem tion ofthelaws.'')(quotingFre.eE/zferpfseFundv.Pub.Co.Acct.

OversightBd.,561U.S.477,499(2010))9UnitedStatesv.Arthrex,Inc,No.19-1434*23,594

U.S. (2021)(Roberts,C.J.,TheConsdtutionallzierarcltyreqllires''theexerciseofexecudvepower(toremain)accountabletothepeopler);& Dkt.69at18quotingEgan,484

U.S.at527(unauthorizedpersons);and,

W HEREAS,thereisruleoflaw ,theCourtsm ustprotecttheExecudveBranclwincumbent-presidentandtheExecudveBranclwform er-presidentforaggressions;and,

W HEREAS,thecurrentactsareaggressionsagninsttheUnitedStates,foundinsome

Westem Hemisphere's-andSisterCommonLawjurisdicdons'-governmentalfashionfor

coupsdetat.

THEREFORE,theCourtshouldenterjudgementinfavoTofPlaintiff,whoisimmune

from prosecudonbytheDefendant-M r.Gonzalez.

W I-IERNAG,inaddidontoDkts.zl,36,and60,thePolitkalQuesdonDoctrine,tm der

Blker,f7.Carr,369U.S.186,217(1962)(atextuallydemonskableconsdttdonalcommitmentoftheissuetoacoordinatepolidcaldeparM ent);and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 12 of 17
W HFREAS,pursuanttothePolidcalQuesdonDockinetheissueLsreservedforthe

Presidencydirectly,fortheinterestofmaintainingPresidendalAutonomy(i.e.inanearlierdraftoftheDeclaradon oflndependenceof1776,ThomasJeffersonaddressedthe

Grievancesagninstthe Parliam ent,wlzic.h he thoughtcaused the dertialofthe Olive

BranchTreatpbut,TheKingwmsstilgivingpowertoParliament),compareOriginalDrafl

(''weutterlydissolveallpolidcalcoxmedionwlzich mayheretoforehavesubskstedbetween usand thepeopleorparliamentofGreatBritain:and finally w edo assertand

dedarethesecoloniestobefreeandindependentstates,andthatasfreeandindependent

states,theyhavef1111powertolevyw ar,condudepeace,contractalliances,establishcom -

merce,andtodoallotheradsandthingswitichindependentstatesmayofrightdo.'')

withFinalDraftpand,

W HEREM ,RobertYates,who refused to sign the United States Corustitudon

thoughtthatthejudidarywouldbeable''tomottld''theroleofthepresidencp6and,

W HRREAS,''A ttmanexperienceteachesthatthosewhoexpec'tpublicdissemination oftheirrem arksm ay welltempercandorwith aconcem forappearancesand for

theirownintereststothedetrimentofthedecisionmakingprocess...lalPresidentand

thosewhoassisthim mustbe&eetoexplorealtem advesintheprocessofshapingpolides

5.https://teachl'ngamericnnhl'stou .org/document/rough-drah-of-dze-declarauon-of-Mdependence/.

6.https:/k- .heritage.org/com ts/report/agaH t-l'udicial-supremaG -ie-fou ders-r d-thelimits-the-courts('IverybodyofmeninvestedG t.IZoffice/'Yatesobserved,''ax'etenadousofpower.''

Moreover,thksloveofpowerwould''influence''judges''toextendtheirpower,andincreasetheirrights,''

w1t11theresultthatthecotzrtswilltendto''givesuchameaninytotheCortsututioninallcaseswhereit

canpossiblybedone,aswillenlargethesphereoftheirauthontyr...Theendresultofallthiswouldbea

Suprem eCourtV tIZpowertorulethecountryinthem ostim portantm attersaccoTdingtoitsow nwilltonotonlyexceed itsauthorit.ybuttousurpothers'authority.''Thispowen'rYatessaid,''willenable''the

justicesoffheSupremeCourt''tomouldtheçwrcmrpcrllintoalmostanyshapeflle.yp/efhqe.''...Yatesfllrfhercontended thattheSuprem eCourtw ould notonlybesuprem eove.rallothercourts,butthatitw ould,in fad,

bethesupremepowerinthegovernmenttobeceatedbytheConsdtudon.Thissxprcv c'.y,Yatescontended,wouldfollowfrom fheCourt'spozpcrofsetlingforallojherpoliticaladorsfheautlmritativerlcflzJhzgof

19eConstitution.TheSupremeCouxtheobsexvedJ''hasthepowerinthelastresort(todeterminea11quesdortsthatmayariseinthecom seoflegaldiscussloa onthem eanlngandconstructlonoftheConstitudon.'').

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 13 of 17
*

andm akingdedsionsand to do soin away thatm any wottld betmwilling toexpress

exceptprivatelp''Nixon,418U.S.at705& 708;and,

W HEREAS,'zlilndesigningthestructureofourGovernmentanddividingandallocatingthesovereignpoweramongthreeco-equalbranches,theFramersoftheConsdtution soughttoprovideacomprehensivesystem ,buttheseparatepoocrswerenotintended

tooperatewithabsoluteindependence,''Nixon,433U.S.at442-3(quotingYoungstownSheet

& TubeCo.r.Sawyer,343U.S.579(1952)/and,

W HEREAS,theAtlom ey Generalm ightbeappropriateifCongress'interestswere

violatedw1t14thePresidendalRecordsAct,butch1:.,2U.S.C.jj192&271-288n,& Andersonv.Dunn,19U.S.204(1821)(onlywhenCongress'interestsareWolated,theSegreant-at-Armsdoestheenforcement;seegeneralyTitle2oftheUnitedStatesCode).

TSEREFORE,theCoul'tshouldenterjudgement,underFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2)or

(b)(6),infavorofPlaintif,whoisimmune9om prosecudonbytheDefendant-o .Gonzalez,and advisethatprosecudonismostproperfrom theincqlmbentPresidenthim qelf

orhishonor'scolznselor,Le.CounselortothePresident(M r.SteveRicchetd,J.D.),butnot

theAtlomeyGeneral(TheHon.MerrickGarland,J.D.).C$WhiteHouseGeneralCounselor(M r.StuartF.Delerp J.D.).IhreLindsey,158F.3dat1280-2(W hiteHouseGeneral

CounseltmderthecommandoftheinclmbentPresidentv.DOJ).Federalist78.AIIdoctlm entsshotlldberetum edtoPlaintiff.

INTHEALTERNATIVE,thecourtmaydismisstmderFed.R.Civ.P.12*)47).

IN TlIEALTERNAH VE,since theD efendant'sactsaretm consdtudonaland cannot

beraM edtobecom econstitudonal,asDefendantom ittedtheincllmbentPresident-l-lead

ofStateand-l-leadofGovernm entagainsttheinmlmbentPresident'sownOrderforProtocol,thecottrtm ay dismissand rulein favorofPlaindfffortheDefendant'stmclean

hands.

15

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 14 of 17
*

IN THEALTERNATIVE,tltecottrtm ayissueanOrdertoShow CausetotheDefendantfor1aw enforcementjurisdidion.

ATALLCOSTS,thisCom tshouldavoidceatingaslipperyslopesothattheincum -

bentPresidentwilbesubjecttoarrestbytheinclmbentAtlomeyGeneral,who,but,

servesatthehonor'spleasm e,orcreatean unconsdtutionalautonom yofexecudvedepnrfm ents,whichwillnotbeaccotm tabletothePeople,-or,som eNm es,totheirvarying

interests-theepitom eofexecudvetyranny.

''(A1prose(motionl,howeverinartfullypleaded,mustbeheldtolesssfmingent

standardsth> form alpleadingsdraftedbylawyers.''Ericlœonv.Pardus,551U.S.89,94

(2007).

IusemyConsdtudonalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknow ingfrom m ytm dergraduateandlaw school,jttrisdodorcandidacp educations,andpoliticalofficesand

from reading1aw outsideofform alschoolingforthewritinganddiscussions,argum ents,

andmotionsofthesefilings,seeDkt.21at5&20andsupra,p.16-7(signaturelinel.

Im ovetoreinstatem y M odon forJFP atDkt.l2.

RespecG llly subm itted,

/s/R jK.Patel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(/rose)

6850East21ststreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion Cotm ty

317-450-6651(ce1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

J.D.Candidate,NokeDameL.SCIU2015-2017

16

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 15 of 17
@.

President/smdentBodyPresident,StudentGov'tAss'nof

EmoryU.,Inc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

StudentBodyPresident,BrownsbttrgCm ty.Sch.

Corp./president,BrownsbtrgHighSch.StudentGov't

2009-2010(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.from theNotreDam eL.Sch.StudentB.Ass'ntothe

Ind.St.B.Ass'n 2017

DeputyRegionalDirector,YoungDemocratsofAm .-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Fotm der& ViceChaip lnd.l-ligh Sch.Democats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.tlndep.l,OxfordC.Republicansof

Em ory U .,Inc.2011-2012

17

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 16 of 17
CERTITIG TE O F SERW CE

1certifythatIservedacoqyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)ReplytoDkt.69on

09/12/2022tobelow indiwdualsviathee-mail:

JamesM .Trusty

1FRAH ,PLLC

1717PennsylvaniaA ve,N W ,Suite650

W aslunpon,DC20006

202-852-5669

jtrustyG frahlaw.com

Lindsey H alllgan

511SE51 Avenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

720-435-2870

lindseyhalligan@outlookcom

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverm an,Thompson,Slutkin,& W hite,

LLC

400EastPrattSkeet,Suite900

Ballim ore,M D 21230

410-385-7775

eCOCCOrM @Si1Ve= M Z OmPS0n.COm

JuanAnlonioGonzalez

U NITED STATESA U ORN EY

99NE41 Street,81 Floor

M iam i,F133132

Telephone:(305)961-9001

juaruantonio.goznzalezthlsdojogov

Jay1.Brat,Chief

Cotmterinteligence&Ejpol'tConkol

Sedion N at'lSecurity Dm

950PennsylvaniaA venue,N W

W asbington,D .C.20530

(202)233-0986

jayobrattze sdoj.gov

PresidentJoeBiden

c/oM arinaM .Kozmycz,AssodateGen.

Counsel

TheE.O.P.attheW hiteH ouse

1600PennsylvaniaAvenueN W

W ashington,D.C.20500

Phone:202-457-1414

IREDACTEDI

Dated:Septem ber12,2022

Res ecfhllly s 'tted,

s/Ra- atel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.PatellProSe)

6850East21stSkeet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion Cotm ty

317-450-6651(cell)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

18

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2022 Page 17 of 17