alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 187.322 Replacement certificate of title. ( a ) If a written certificate of title is lost, stolen, mutilated, destroyed, or otherwise becomes unavailable or illegible, the secured party of record or, if no secured party is indicated in the files of the office, the owner of record may apply for and, by furnishing information satisfactory to the office, obtain a replacement certificate in the name of the owner of record.
( b ) An applicant for a replacement certificate of title must sign the application, and, except as otherwise permitted by the office, the application must comply with § 187.307. The application must include the existing certificate unless the certificate is lost, stolen, mutilated, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable.
( c ) A replacement certificate of title created by the office must comply with § 187.309 and indicate on the face of the certificate that it is a replacement certificate.
( d ) If a person receiving a replacement certificate of title subsequently obtains possession of the original written certificate, the person must promptly destroy the original certificate of title.
§ 203.31 Authority. Emergency operations under Public Law 84-99 apply to Flood Response and Post Flood Response activities. Flood Response activities include flood fighting, rescue operations, and protection of Corps-constructed hurricane/shore protection projects. Post Flood Response activities include certain limited activities intended to prevent imminent loss of life or significant public property, or to protect against significant threats to public health and welfare, and are intended to bridge the time frame between the occurrence of a disaster and the provision of disaster relief efforts under authority of The Stafford Act. ( a ) *Flood Response.* Flood Response measures are applicable to any flood control work where assistance is supplemental to tribal, State, and local efforts, except that Corps assistance is not appropriate to protect flood control works constructed, previously repaired, and/or maintained by other Federal agencies, where such agencies have emergency flood fighting authority. Further, Flood Response measures (except technical assistance) are not appropriate for flood control works protecting strictly agricultural lands. Corps assistance in support of other Federal agencies, or State and local interests, may include the following: technical advice and assistance; lending of flood fight supplies, e.g., sandbags, lumber, polyethylene sheeting, or stone; lending of Corps-owned equipment; hiring of equipment and operators for flood operations; emergency contracting; and similar measures.
( b ) *Post Flood Response.* The Corps may furnish Post Flood Response assistance for a period not to exceed 10 days (the statutory limitation) from the date of the Governor's request to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for an emergency or disaster declaration under authority of the Stafford Act. Requests for Post Flood Response assistance must be made by the Governor of the affected State, except that requests for assistance on lands held in trust by the United States, or on lands of the Alaska Natives, may be submitted directly by the affected federally recognized Indian Tribe or Alaska Native Corporation, or through the appropriate regional representative of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or through the Governor of the State in which the lands are located. Assistance from the Corps may include the following: provision of technical advice and assistance; cleaning of drainage channels, bridge openings, or structures blocked by debris deposited during a flood event, where the immediate threat of flooding of or damage to public facilities has not abated; removal of debris blockages of critical water supply intakes, sewer outfalls, etc.; clearance of the minimum amounts of debris necessary to reopen critical transportation routes or public services/facilities; other assistance required to prevent imminent loss of life or significant damage to public property, or to protect against significant threats to public health and welfare. Post Flood Response assistance is supplemental to the maximum efforts of non-Federal interests.
#### JOHN M. EASTERLY, Plaintiff, *v.*WILLIAM C. BARBER, Defendant.

Motion for new trial by both parties, on exceptions ordered to be heard at the General Term in the first instance. The case on a former appeal will be found reported in 3 New York Supreme Court Reports, 421. The only question arising upon the new trial, not already passed upon by the General Term on the former appeal, was as to the effect of a note’s being renewed to replace paper on which all the parties to the new note were liable upon an agreement made when the original paper was made, that the several parties were to be liable, as between themselves, as co-sureties. The judge refused to charge that the giving of the new note did away with the agreement made as to the obligations of the parties on the original note, .and the General Term sustained the ruling, holding that in the absence of any new arrangement, the inference would be that the renewed paper was indorsed upon the basis of the original arrangement.

*E. H. Avery,*for the plaintiff.

*Francis Kernan,*for the defendant.

Opinion by

Morgan, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Morgan, JJ.

Motion for new trial denied.
**1995-  cold_storage_01.20.95cold_storage_02.22.95cold_storage_03.22.95cold_storage_04.21.95cold_storage_05.22.95cold_storage_06.22.95cold_storage_07.21.95cold_storage_08.22.95cold_storage_09.22.95cold_storage_10.20.95cold_storage_11.22.95cold_storage_12.21.95

**
• 

SPAS 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 68
 

Reportable Quantity Adjustment Methyl Bromide Production Wastes
 

54 FR 41402-41408
 

October 6, 1989
 

(HSWA Ciuster II)
 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ER IN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

PART 261 -IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE WAC 173-303 

SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES 

HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES 

add K131 and K132 

to the subgroup 

"Pesticides" 261;32 9904 x 

APPENDIX III - CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST METHODS 

• 

add, in alphabetic 

order, to Table 1, . 

two compounds and 

methods for their 

analysis Appendix III 110(3)(f) x 

APPENDIX VII - BASIS FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE 

add, in numeric order, 

entries for K131 and 

K132· Appendix VII 082(4) X 

•
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.213 New Haven Harbor, Quinnipiac and Mill Rivers. The draws of the Tomlinson Bridge, mile 0.0, the Ferry Street Bridge, mile 0.7, and the Grand Avenue Bridge, mile 1.3, across the Quinnipiac River, and the Chapel Street Bridge, mile 0.4, across the Mill River, shall operate as follows: ( a ) The draw of the Tomlinson Bridge at mile 0.0, across the Quinnipiac River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., noon to 12:15 p.m., 12:45 p.m. to 1 p.m., and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic.
( b ) The draw of the Ferry Street Bridge at mile 0.7, across Quinnipiac River, shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draws need not open for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( c ) The draw of the Grand Avenue Bridge at mile 1.3, across the Quinnipiac River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( d ) The draw of the Chapel Street Bridge at mile 0.4, across the Mill River shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal after at least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
[USCG-2009-1021, 78 FR 13481, Feb. 28, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.455 Minimum under-keel clearance. ( a ) The owner or operator of a tankship, that is not fitted with a double bottom that covers the entire cargo tank length, shall provide the tankship master with written under-keel clearance guidance that includes— ( 1 ) Factors to consider when calculating the ship's deepest navigational draft;
( 2 ) Factors to consider when calculating the anticipated controlling depth;
( 3 ) Consideration of weather or environmental conditions; and
( 4 ) Conditions which mandate when the tankship owner or operator shall be contacted prior to port entry or getting underway; if no such conditions exist, the guidance must contain a statement to that effect.
( b ) Prior to entering the port or place of destination and prior to getting underway, the master of a tankship that is not fitted with the double bottom that covers the entire cargo tank length shall plan the ship's passage using guidance issued under paragraph (a) of this section and estimate the anticipated under-keel clearance. The tankship master and the pilot shall discuss the ship's planned transit including the anticipated under-keel clearance. An entry must be made in the tankship's official log or in other onboard documentation reflecting discussion of the ship's anticipated passage.
( c ) The owner or operator of a tank barge, that is not fitted with a double bottom that covers the entire cargo tank length, shall not permit the barge to be towed unless the primary towing vessel master or operator has been provided with written under-keel clearance guidance that includes— ( 1 ) Factors to consider when calculating the tank barge's deepest navigational draft;
( 2 ) Factors to consider when calculating the anticipated controlling depth;
( 3 ) Consideration of weather or environmental conditions; and
( 4 ) Conditions which mandate when the tank barge owner or operator shall be contacted prior to port entry or getting underway; if no such conditions exist, the guidance must contain a statement to that effect.
[CGD 91-045, 62 FR 49608, Sept. 23, 1997]
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  October 22, 2009
    /s/ Kevin KyserKevin Kyser,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

173)IV-E-46 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56 PM Sheet 173 of 242 
m<*° Sr^r 

use 

'"< PRO* 0 

/ 

P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGA N 48105 

PlST-Jrl. 

••/ I 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Followup to Onboard Hardware Briefings 

FROM: 

TO: 

John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Public Docket A-87-11 

On April 26th and April 28, 1988 I had separate 

conversations with representatives of Chrysler (Gary Dawson), 

Ford (Mike Schwartz) and GM (Jim Pasek) about when we might be 

able to get comments back from them about the improved onboard 

hardware we have developed. Chrysler indicated that it wasn't 

certain when a response would be given, and that it was 

planning to build and test a liquid seal system of its own. 

Ford plans to supply something to us in about a week. GM has 

not made a decision about whether to give early feedback or to 

await the results of its own testing. GM does, however, plan 

to send a response to a recent letter from Lee Thomas on this 

subject. 

I told all three companies that we were interested in 

their comments and input on ways to improve the performance of 

this system.
§ 183.550 Fuel tanks: Installation. ( a ) Each fuel tank must not be integral with any boat structure or mounted on an engine.
( b ) Each fuel tank must not move at the mounting surface more than onefourth inch in any direction.
( c ) Each fuel tank must not support a deck, bulkhead, or other structural component.
( d ) Water must drain from the top surface of each metallic fuel tank when the boat is in its static floating position.
( e ) Each fuel tank support, chock, or strap that is not integral with a metallic fuel tank must be insulated from the tank surface by a nonmoisture absorbing material.
( f ) Cellular plastic must not be the sole support for a metallic fuel tank.
( g ) If cellular plastic is the sole support of a non-metallic fuel tank, the cellular plastic must meet the requirements of § 183.516 (b) or (c).
( h ) Each fuel tank labeled under § 183.514(b)(8) for installation aft of the boat's half length must be installed with its center of gravity aft of the boat's half length.
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 81-092, 48 FR 55737, Dec. 15, 1983; USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2005 ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: November 9, 2004
    /s/ Jeffrey A. RichJeffrey A. Rich,Chief Executive Officer of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Bruce Benn, of Validian Corporation, certify that: (1)I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Validian Corporation;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  (4)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: May 18, 2007  By: /s/ Bruce Benn Bruce Benn Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81293-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

ISLAND IP ACQUISITIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPENCER ANTLE, ISLAND COMPANY LLC, 

and ISLAND COMPANY RUM, INC.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties’ Consent to Proceed Before a United 

States Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 66], filed on October 9, 2023, in which the parties consent to 

referral of this case to United States Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for all further proceedings, 

including trial and the entry of final judgment. The Court has carefully reviewed the Notice of 

Consent and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all 

further proceedings, including trial, shall be presided over by United States 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. 

2. The Clerk of Court shall MODIFY the case number, style, and docket to reflect this 

consent and referral.

Case 9:22-cv-81293-BER Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2023 Page 1 of 2
 CASE NO. 22-81293-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 10th day of October

2023. 

_________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81293-BER Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2023 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres

DELIO BATISTA, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

 ORDER STRIKING DISCOVERY NOTICES

THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte. On February 13, 2023, Defendants

filed Defendants’ Request for Production [ECF No. 49], Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories 

to Plaintiffs [ECF No. 50], and Defendants’ First Request for Admissions to Plaintiff [ECF No. 

51]. Under Local Rule 26.1(b), discovery responses and notices “shall not be filed until they are 

used in the proceeding or the court orders filing.” S.D. FLA. L.R. 26.1(b). The Notices have not 

been used in this proceeding, nor has the Court ordered their filing. Accordingly, 

Defendants’ Notices [ECF Nos. 49, 50, and 51] are STRICKEN.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 14th day of February, 2023.

 ________________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 148.600 What is the limit of financial liability?

The financial limit for liability for deepwater ports is set in accordance with 33 U.S.C. 2704.
EXHIBIT
31.1                                           Certifications
 
  I, Thomas
Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of Worlds.com Inc. certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
"Company");
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
Company's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 
 a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal period that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data;
and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.
 
 Date:
October 1, 2009
 
 /s/ Thomas
Kidrin
 Thomas
Kidrin