alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 177.04 Order of unsafe condition. ( a ) The Commandant has redelegated to Coast Guard District Commanders, with the reservation that this authority shall not be further redelegated, the authority, under 46 U.S.C. 4308, to issue orders applicable to a specific boat within the District Commander's jurisdiction designating that boat unsafe for a specific voyage on a specific body of water when it is determined, under the provisions of § 177.07(f), that an unsafe condition exists.
( b ) Each order issued by a Coast Guard District Commander under the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section will contain: ( 1 ) Notice that the person upon whom the order is served has the right under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(e)), to petition for reconsideration and repeal of the order;
( 2 ) Full title and address of the Coast Guard District Commander to whom the petition is to be submitted; and
( 3 ) Notice that the petition should contain: ( i ) The text or substance of the order which the petitioner seeks to have reconsidered and repealed;
( ii ) A statement of the action sought by the petitioner;
( iii ) Whatever arguments or data that are available to the petitioner to support the action sought; and
( iv ) An advisement that if the petitioner desires reconsideration and repeal of the rule before a specific date, the petition should so state and give reasons why action by that date is necessary.
( c ) If a Coast Guard District Commander determines that a petition submitted under the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section contains adequate justification, the District Commander will initiate prompt action to repeal the order. If the District Commander determines that repeal of the order is not justified, the District Commander will issue prompt written notice of denial to the petitioner.
[CGD 95-057, 60 FR 34150, June 30, 1995, as amended by USCG-2013-0216, 78 FR 40966, July 9, 2013]
§ 25.403 Claims payable. A claim arising at any place caused by military personnel or civilian employees of the Coast Guard acting within the scope of their employment, or otherwise incident to noncombat activities of the Coast Guard, whether or not negligence or intentional tort is shown, is payable under this subpart for: ( a ) Damage to or loss of real property, including damage or loss incident to the use and occupancy of real property by the Coast Guard;
( b ) Damage to or loss of personal property, including property bailed to the Coast Guard;
( c ) Damage to or loss of registered or insured mail while the mail is in the possession of the Coast Guard even though damaged or lost by criminal act; or
( d ) Death or personal injury.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: SouthDakota timber industry, an assessment of timber product output and use**
 
1993 | 1999 | 2004 | 2009| 2014
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80/24:
Item Number:0083-B-33 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000644911
 
August 10, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT TARA GOLD RESOURCES CORP. Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350   In connection with the Annual Report of Tara Gold Resources Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Francis R. Biscan, Jr., the Principal Executive Officer and David Bizzaro, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.   December 8, 2010  By: /s/Francis R. Biscan, Jr. Francis R. Biscan, Jr., Principal Executive Officer   By: /s/David Bizzaro David Bizzaro, Principal Financial Officer
#### Weldon *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,-

Decided December 11, 1906.

Accusation of. simple larceny. Before Judge Littlejohn. Crisp superior court. September 26, 1906.

*Walter F. Hall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Frank A. Hooper, solicitor-general,*contra.

Evans, J.

The evidence, though wholly circumstantial, was ample to support the conviction in the county court; and it was not erroneous for the judge of the superior court to overrule the petition for certiorari, complaining that the evidence was insufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the larceny charged in the accusation.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  List of Contractor Interests and Resources

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/List of Contractor Interests and Resources List of Contractor Interests and ResourcesADR2022-02-17T19:21:17-05:00
			
			List of Contractor Interests and ResourcesEvery contractor or offeror has many interests and resources that are common in all contracts.
Interests:
Ensure timely performance of a contract because [____fill in the blank ____];
Generate gross sales and profit;
Comply with legal requirements;
Create a defensible file to withstand public and government scrutiny;
Create opportunities for future work;
Avoid negative performance reviews;
Maintain positive customer relations;
Protect intellectual property, trade secrets, and commercial/financial information;
Retain good suppliers, subcontractors, and employees.Resources:
Funds;
Contractual authority (e.g., right to file claims and protests, VECP clauses, etc.);
Statutory and Regulatory authority (e.g., bankruptcy protection, etc.);
Subcontractors and suppliers;
Contractor’s insurance;
Professional services (accountants, consultants, attorneys, etc.);
Skilled employees (tradesmen, engineers, attorneys, contracting specialists, etc.);
Goodwill / reputationEach contract or project also may present unique interests and resources to add to these standard items. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
#### § 20.801 General.

Any party may present his or her case or defense by oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence; submit rebuttal evidence; and conduct any cross-examination that may be necessary for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         886,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,107,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,896,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,026,000
<PP&E>                                       3,155,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,253,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       54,067,000
<BONDS>                                      9,985,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,496,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,028,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,677,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,253,000
<SALES>                                    196,439,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           196,439,000
<CGS>                                      153,181,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              153,181,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            39,371,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,299,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,588,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,132,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,456,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,456,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
        

</TABLE>
§ 151.41 Operating requirements for oceangoing ships with IOPP Certificates: Category C and D Oil-like NLSs. The master or person in charge of an oceangoing ship certificated under § 151.37(a) shall ensure that— ( a ) The carriage and discharge of the oil-like NLS meets §§ 157.29, 157.31, 157.35, 157.37, 157.41, 157.45, 157.47, and 157.49 of this chapter; and
( b ) The oil-like NLS is not discharged unless— ( 1 ) The monitor required by § 151.37(a)(1) is set to detect the oil-like NLS; and
( 2 ) A statement that the monitor has been set to detect the oil-like NLS is entered in the Oil Record Book Part II(Cargo/Ballast Operations), required by § 151.25.
IJM TED STATESDISTRICT CO URT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.22-80801-CV-M IDDLEBROOK SN a% ev =

LANDFM L 2,lNC.,aFloridacorporation,

Plnintiff,

DATASCORE-M ,LLC,aTexaslimited

liabilitycompany;BRENT BIGGS,

individually;andDATASCOREENTERPRJSES,

C0RP.,aDelawarecorporation,

Defendants.

/

ORDER ADOPTG G REPORT AxD RECOM M ENDATION

THIS CAUSE com es before the Courton a Report

MagiskateJudgeWiliam Matthewman(thetRepoxf'lonFebruary8,2023.(DE78).'l'heReport

recommendsthat(1)Plnintim sComplnintbedismissedwithoutprejudice,(2)Plnl'ntifrspleadings

besGcken,and(3)DefendantDatascoreEntepdsesCorp.(tr atmscore'')electtoeitherdismiss

itsCotmterclnimsormoveforadefaultjudgment,orseekotherappropdaterelief.Duetothe

and Recomm endation issued by

impending trialofthism atteron February 27,2023,Judge M atthewman,pursllnntto S.D .Fla.

MagistrateJudgeRule4(b),shortenedtheobjectionsdeadlinetoFebruary15,2023.Noobjections

havebeenmadetodate.M teracarefulreview ofJudgeM atthewman'sReportandtherecordms

awholeintliscase,Iap eewiththeReport'srecom mendations.

Accordingly,itishereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1)MagiskateJudgeMathewman'sReportandRecommendation(DE78)isADOPTED.

(2)PlaintiY sComple t(DE1-3)isDISMISSEDW ITHOUTPREJUDICE.

(3)PlaintiY sAnswertoDefendantDatmscore'sCotmterclaim (DE28)isSTRICKEN.

Case 9:22-cv-80801-DMM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2023 Page 1 of 2
(4)DefendantDaœ core isDIRECTED to eitherdismissitscounterclaimsagainst

Plintiff/rmoveforclerk'sentryofdefaultonorbyFebruaa 24,2023.IfDefendant

Dat%coreelectstomoveforclerk'sentryofdefault,theCourtwillenteranOrderwith

instructionsastoamotionfordefaultjudpnent.Failuretotimelyseekreliefmayresult

indismissalwithoutprejudice.

(5)Giventheforegoing,thecalendarcalscheduledforFebruac 22,2023,at1:14p.m.

isCANCELLED.Inaddition,thetrialoftàism attersetforFebruac 27,2023,at

9:00a.m .isVACATED.

(6)DefendantDaœ core'sMotionforPartialSummaryJudgment(DE68)andMotionto

StnikePlaintiY sJuryDemand(DE76)areDEM EDASMOO .

SIGNEDinChambersinWestPalmBeach, Floridw this/K or 23

DonaldM .M lddlebrooks

UnitedSàtesDistrictJudge

cc;CounselofRecord

2

Case 9:22-cv-80801-DMM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Luminary Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  March 27, 2007
United States Patent and Trademark							Office Patents Trademarks Fees and payment Help - FAQs
- Contact us
MyUSPTO Sign in -   MyUSPTO console

 Office of Enrollment and Discipline				

 OEDIS 

 OEDIS             - Home (current)
            - Practitioner Finder
            - Applicant Portal
            - Practitioner Portal
            - About OED
            - OEDIS Help
#### Boyd *v.*Kinzy.

Beck, J.

1. When the lessee of lands sublets to another, the latter giving his promissory note for the amount of rent agreed.upon, the relation of landlord and tenant exists, and the subtenant, in proceedings to enforce the payment of the rent by distress warrant, will not be permitted to dispute the title of his landlord by setting up that the subtenancy was created without the consent of the owner.

2. Upon review (at request of counsel for plaintiff in error) of the case of *Morgan*v. *Morgan,*65 *Ga.*493, it is agreed that the principle of law enunciated in the third headnote is sound, and should be adhered to, it being supported by a long line of authorities. *Spence*v. *Wilson,*102 *359*Ga.*762; *Hudson,*v. *Stewart,*110 *Ga.*37; *Fletcher*v. Fletcher, 123 *Ga.*470, and cit.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided January 17, 1907.

Appeal. Before Judge Kimsey. Hall superior court. January 30, 1906.

*J. G. Collins,*for plaintiff in error.

3. The issue made upon the defendant’s contention that his note for rent was “obtained by fraud and misrepresentation” upon the part of the plaintiff was duly submitted to the jury by the court’s charge; and the evidence authorized a finding against the defendant upon that issue.

4. The evidence supported the finding of the jury as to the amount of rent due.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
Argued and submitted June 27,

affirmed September 30,

reconsideration denied November 25, 1992,

petition for review denied January 26, 1993 (315 Or 312)

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Mary A. Price, Claimant. Mary A. PRICE, *Petitioner, v.*NORPAC FOODS, INC., *Respondent.*

(91-01526; CA A72855)

837 P2d 564

Edward J. Harri, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Donald M. Hooton and Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen & Correll, Eugene.

Robert Trethewy, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Garrett, Hemann, Robertson, Paulus, Jennings & Comstock, P.C., Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Martinez v. Dallas Nursing Home,*114 Or App 453, 836 P2d 147 (1992).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 792

_____________________________

K EITH A. H ALPERN , Appellant,

v.

N IKOLETA G. K OIKOS ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Leon County

. Charles A. Francis , Judge

.
October 31, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. Appellant challenges the injunction against domestic violence entered January 26, 2017, after the final hearing held that same date. Appellant argues that the injunction was not supported by competent substantial evidence. However, after our order allowing Appellant to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or stipulated s tatement of the evidence, he did not do

so. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200 (b)(4), (f)(2) . A ccordingly, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Murphy v. Blubaugh

, --- So. 3d

--- , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 2018 WL 3636747 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 1, 2018); Jackson v. Echols , 937 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 200 6) ; Ricketts v. Ricketts , 790 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Ain v. Ain , 778 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)

.2 A FFIRMED

.

W ETHERELL , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Keith A. Halpern, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance
, for Appellee.
Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 1 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 2 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 3 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 5 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 6 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 7 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 8 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 9 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20446-WPD Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 10 of 10
City of Memphis Code Section 16

- 98 Reporting Requirements

(a) Except as provided below, each permitted stationary air pollution source must submit to the Department an annual report that establishes the amount of actual emissions of each regulated polluta nt, including carbon monoxide, for that source. This report will be for the emissions of that source that occurred during the calendar year starting in 1991 and continuing for succeeding years thereafter. The Department may request, and the air pollution source shall provide, additional information on the emissions data submitted when the Department determines, the data previously provided is inadequate to establish the actual type or amount of emissions from the source subject to

fees.

(b) Not including air toxics as they are defined in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the amendments thereto, if the source emits fewer than twenty five (25) tons of actual emissions of pollutant during a year, it may at its option, use as the actual emissions figur e, its permitted pollutant levels where available and known. If the source is a "major source" under the air toxics provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 it too must calculate its actual emission of regulated pollutants. Failure to provide, on a timely basis, any additional information requested shall be considered failure to pay the fees.

(Ord. No. 4105, effective July 1, 1992, amended by Ord No. 4320, adopted 5

- 2

- 95, effective 6

- 7

- 95.)

1698, p. 1
Year in Review

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ACL DATA COUNCIL 

2020

PURPOSE

Support ACL’s mission by improving the coordination of ACL’s data governance, including 

the development of improved processes and standards for defining, collecting, reviewing, 

certifying, analyzing, and presenting data ACL collects through its evaluation, grant 

reporting, and administrative performance measures.

23 Council Members, representing:

APPROACH

MEMBERS











ACL Regional Administrators

Administration on Aging

Administration on Disabilities

Center for Innovation and Partnership

Center for Policy and Evaluation

National Institute on Disability, Independent

Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Office of Information Resources Management

 Office of Performance and Evaluation





Data Quality

3 quarterly Data

Council meetings

3 Data Quality Working 

Group meetings

4 Data Governance 

Standards Working 

Group meetings

Held 10 

Meetings Data Council framework

Data quality needs assessment

Sample text focused on data 

quality for funding opportunity 

announcements (FOAs)

Data Quality 101 infographic

Annotated bibliography for existing 

Federal data standards, frameworks,

and models 

Data governance primer

Developed 6 Products







Outputs

Key Outcomes Identified 

by Council Members

Identified ACL data needs and gaps 

Gained better understanding of 

ACL programs

Began sharing effective data 

practices across ACL programs

Strengthened interagency 

relationships and collaboration with 

Department of Homeland Security 

and Social Security Administration









Prioritize identified 

risks and challenges, 

balancing the resources 

needed to address 

them and potential 

benefits 

Propose products, 

such as white papers or 

guidelines for metadata 

to accompany completed 

datasets; develop 

language for footnotes 

to accompany data 

releases, etc.

Identify approaches 

to address risks and 

challenges; e.g., have 

contractor develop 

intial drafts of 

products

Identify risks and 

challenges for 

ACL's data

1. 2. 3. 4.

2 Working Groups

11 members

Data Governance 

Standards

10 members

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Website https://acl.gov/programs/research-and-development/data-collection-projects
Order filed September 11, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00355

- CV

____________ FATIMA ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A HWY 6 SHA MROCK AND SAEED SHAIKH , Appellant s
V. TARA ENERGY, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Co urt at Law #4

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10

- CCV

- 042684



### O R D E R
Appellant s ’ brief was due August 20, 2014

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed.
Unless appellant s file a brief with this court on or before October 10 , 2014
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM