alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, David Parker, certify that;
 
 (1)  I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of eRXSYS, Inc.;
 
 (2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
 about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
 business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
 affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5)  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
 reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
 equivalent functions):
 
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
 reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: March 15, 2004
 
 
 /s/ David Parker
 By: David Parker
 Title: Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
   1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-22744-RNS

VICTOR ARIZA, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

FIVE BELOW, INC., a foreign for-profit 

corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, by and through his undersigned Counsel, hereby provides notice 

that the parties have reached a settlement and will be executing necessary paperwork resolving all

claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court provide 

the parties twenty (20) days from the date of filing this Notice to allow the parties to finalize the 

settlement agreement and file dismissal documents with prejudice.

DATED: October 21, 2022.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

 Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 1:22-cv-22744-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 187.107 What information must be made available to assist law enforcement officials and what information may be made available? ( a ) A participating State must make the following information available to VIS for use by law enforcement officials: ( 1 ) Vessel identifier(s), as required by § 187.9.
( 2 ) Notice of law enforcement status. Authorized terms are “lost”, “stolen”, “destroyed”, “abandoned”, or “recovered”.
( 3 ) Date of notice of law enforcement status.
( 4 ) Point of contact for the agency or official reporting the status.
( 5 ) National Crime Information Center code for the reporting agency or official.
( b ) A participating State may make the following information available to law enforcement officials: ( 1 ) Notice that the vessel is being sought for a law enforcement purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) Location of vessel when reported lost, stolen, destroyed, abandoned, or recovered.
( 3 ) Vessel insurance policy number.
( 4 ) Name of insurance company.
( 5 ) Address of insurance company.
( 6 ) Mailing address of insurance company, if different from the address in paragraph (b)(5) of this section.
( 7 ) Telephone number of insurance company.
( 8 ) Date the vessel was recovered.
( 9 ) Location of the vessel when recovered.
( 10 ) Names and telephone numbers of contacts not listed under paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
( 11 ) Request to be notified if vessel is sighted.
( 12 ) Purpose of sighting notification request.
( 13 ) Date and time vessel last sighted.
( 14 ) Location of vessel when last sighted.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 73 

Designating February 6, 2007, as ‘‘Ronald Reagan Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2007 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. STEVENS, 

Mrs. DOLE, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. VITTER, Mr. HATCH, Mr. MCCAIN, 

Mr. MCCONNELL, and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating February 6, 2007, as ‘‘Ronald Reagan Day’’. 

Whereas President Ronald Wilson Reagan, a man of humble 

background, worked throughout his life serving as an entertainer, a corporate spokesman, Governor of California, 

and President of the United States; 

Whereas Ronald Reagan served for 2 terms as the 40th 

President of the United States; 

Whereas Ronald Reagan was elected to his second term by 

almost three-fifths of the electorate, a percentage surpassed only by the election of President Lyndon Baines 

Johnson in 1964, and was victorious in 49 of the 50 

States in the general election, an electoral college record 

unsurpassed in the history of Presidential elections in the 

United States; and 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 73 ATS 

Whereas February 6, 2007, will be the 96th anniversary of 

Ronald Reagan’s birth, and June 5, 2007, will be the 

third anniversary of his passing: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates February 6, 2007, as ‘‘Ronald 

3 Reagan Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
The State of /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 31, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00470

- CR

David MEDRANO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4205

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial court’s certification states that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has

NO right of appeal.” We therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to file, within ten days of the date

of this order , an electronic clerk’s record containing the following documents:

1. All pre

- trial motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

2. all documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain, including the

court’s admonishments, the defendant’s waiver and consent to st ipulation

of testimony, and any other stipulations;

3. the judgment;

4. all post

- judgment motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

5. the notice(s) of appeal;

6. the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal;

7. the criminal docket sheet ; and

8

. the bill of costs.All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk,

and the court repo rter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 31st day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Ke ith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 25.801 Scope.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the administrative settlement of claims against the United States for damage to or loss of property resulting from containment or removal activities during Phase III or IV of the National Contingency Plan, under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended. 33 U.S.C. 1321.
Older Americans Month

Event Planning Tips

• Plan: Start planning early and set clear 

goals. Identify people who can help, including 

volunteers and vendors. Communicate 

regularly with your planning team and track 

major decisions. Select your event date and 

time early in the planning process. Create 

an agenda as one of the first steps and be 

sure that speakers, special guests, and key 

stakeholders have the time reserved.

• Partner: Join forces with others in your 

community who can provide in-kind services, 

volunteers, or materials. They may also have 

connections to speakers or entertainers. Local 

businesses, like restaurants, may agree to 

provide door/game prizes, such as gift cards. 

Partners also can help to draw attention 

to your activities online, reaching a wider 

audience.

• Promote: Develop a publicity plan to promote 

your event. Use traditional strategies, like 

newspaper ads and community board flyers, 

as well as newer media—your website, blog, 

and/or social media accounts. Communicate 

early and often. You might also consider 

contacting a local reporter.

Conduct registration online via any of the free 

options available. If you have an existing email 

distribution list, use it. Virtual invitations can 

make your email stand out.

• Produce virtually: Choose a platform that 

fits your budget. Free or low-cost options may 

work for smaller events of up to 100 people. 

Make sure the platform is accessible for 

participants and includes any special features 

you need (e.g., recording, whiteboard, 

breakout rooms). Conduct a dry run well in 

advance to refine logistics and troubleshoot 

technical issues. 

Remember, attention spans are shorter 

online. Aim for an hour-long event and include 

breaks if it will be longer. Assign at least one 

moderator to answer questions, engage 

participants, and keep time. Interact as much 

as possible, engaging people with games, 

polls, and/or Q&A segments. 

• Produce in person: Safety is always a 

priority. Follow all relevant local, state, and 

CDC guidance for in person events in your 

area. Think about logistics – is the location 

accessible? Is there ample parking? Do you 

need to rent any equipment, furniture, or 

supplies? 

Consider bringing standard event items such 

as refreshments; public address (PA) system 

and other audio/visual equipment; pens and 

notepads; handout materials; decorations; 

and photo release forms (sample release). 

• Publish: Post a summary of the event on 

your website and highlight key aspects on 

social media. Make sure to tag the accounts 

of any partners who helped you and use a few 

relevant hashtags. Include photos or graphics 

to gain traction for your posts. 

If possible, gather feedback on what 

participants liked/disliked during this phase. If 

you have any future activities planned, use this 

opportunity to promote the next event.

Visit acl.gov/oam for more Older Americans Month resources.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671

DELIO BATISTA,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC.,

et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S STATEMENT

OF CLAIM

Defendants, Avant Assurance Inc, Reinier Cortes, and Andrea Gonzalez Quintero, 

pursuant to the Court’s most recent Order, February 1, 2023 [D.E. No. 39], files this Response to 

Plaintiffs Statement of Claim based on the information known to Defendants as follows:

ANSWER

1.- Denied to the extent that the Plaintiffs assert that Plaintiffs were employees and received 

hourly wages.

2.- Without knowledge, therefore denied.

3.- Denied in its entirety (i.e. as to the claims made by Plaintiff Mariana Lopez, Plaintiff Carlos 

Lopez, Plaintiff Rafeal Valiente, and Plaintiff Delio Batista).

4.- Denied.

5.- Without knowledge, therefore denied

6.- Without knowledge, therefore denied.

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 1 of 3
7.- Without knowledge, therefore denied.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE I: HOURLY WAGES

7.- At all material times Plaintiffs were fully paid as independent contractors. 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE II: RECEIPT OF FORM 1099 NEC

8.- At all material times and pursuant to Plaintiffs request, Defendants issued IRS form(s) 1099 

NEC for their federal income tax reporting obligations.

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE III: LACK OF STANDING

9.- Plaintiffs lack standing because each Plaintiff has established their independent contractor 

status through their respective business entities and further requested that the Defendants prepare 

IRS form 1099 NEC for their business entities.

WHEREFORE, Defendants reserve the right to amend these affirmative defenses, and 

do not waive any of the Affirmative Defenses available under applicable law or any other matter 

constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense as discovery may reveal.

Santiago Cueto, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0162566

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Ste 470

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel.: (305) 777 0377

Primary Email: sc@cuetolawgroup.com

Attorney for Defendant

/S/ Santiago Cueto

SANTIAGO CUETO

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been filed via 

electronic communication this 6th day of February 2023, with the Clerk of Court and served upon 

all Counsel of Record.

/S/ Santiago Cueto

______________________

Santiago Cueto, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0162566

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Ste 470

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel.: (305) 777 0377

Primary Email: sc@cuetolawgroup.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 3 of 3
March 2, 2015 

RE: Relief Requested from 14 CFR 91.313 

PETITION for EXEMPTION 

Answers to FAR 11.81 

(a) With rotor Aviaiton, Inc. 

P.O. Box 653 

Lakeview OR 97630 

Kyle Witham 

Phone: 541-947-5265 

Fax: 541-947-3321 

withrotor.kyle@hotmail.com 

(b) Seeking Exemption from 14 CFR 91.313 (a)- (b) 

(c) The extent of relief that we are seeking is from the restriction of only being able to train 

and check our company pilots while performing special purpose operations. By lifting this 

restriction we can use our restricted category aircraft to perform the necessary training and 

check rides required to satisfy FAR 61.58. 

(d) By granting this exemption it will make it more cost effective for us as a small business 

which affects the public as a whole since small businesses are the back bone of our 

economy. The cost of having to train our pilots leasing a standard category aircraft to 

perform our in house training and check rides will cost approximately $30,000.00 per pilot 

annually. This cost includes travel expenses and per diem. This is not cost effective and 

will ultimately affect the number of pilots we are able to hire. In addition from a safety 

perspective, our pilots can be trained and kept current in all aspects of operations within the 

scope of the FARs and not just the special purpose operations in the very aircraft they will 

be out operating. 

(e) This exemption will serve to enhance the safety of our operations as our pilots would be 

training and taking check rides in the very aircraft they will be out operating and would not 

be limited on training to special purpose operations. 

(f) In summary, With rotor Aviation, Inc. has been operating accident and violation free for 

the past 18 years and is seeking relief of the crew member training restrictions of FAR 

91.313 (a)-(b) so as to enhance our ability to continue operating in the professional and 

safe manner we have demonstrated over the years. This exemption would allow us to train 

company pilots in our own company aircraft which they are accustomed to and familiar with. 

It would also relieve us from the undue burden of the cost associated with leasing standard 

category aircraft and thereby limiting our ability to hire pilots. 

23195 Thomas Creek Road • Lakeview. OR 97630 • (541) 947-5265 • Fax (541) 947 ·3321 

info@withrotor.com ~ wwvv.withrotor.com 
V\IITHROTOR 

,===11~,aNc.==~ 

(g) We believe there are several helicopter operators who will be seeking relief from this 

FAR for the very same reasons that we are. 

(h) With rotor Aviation, Inc. does not have any interest in exercising this exemption outside 

the United Sates. 

Sincerely, ( . 

y-;;:;/~~~ 

Kyle Witham 

23195 Thomas Creek Road • Lakeview, OR 97630 • (541) 947-5265 • Fax (541) 947-3321 

info@withrotor.com • www.withrotor.com
#### § 125.03 District Commander.

The term *District Commander* means the officer of the Coast Guard designated by the Commandant to command a Coast Guard District.
January
      24, 2006











Board
      of
      Directors


Innofone.Com,
      Incorporated


1431
      Ocean Avenue, Suite 1100


Santa
      Monica, CA 90401


U.S.A.





Dear
      Sirs:





This
      letter is to constitute our consent to include the audit report of Innofone.Com,
      Incorporated as of June 30, 2005 in the Registration Statement Filed on 10-KA
      contemporaneously herewith and subject to any required amendments
      thereto.








Yours
      very truly,





**DANZIGER
      & HOCHMAN**








/s/
      Gary
      Cilevitz








Gary
      Cilevitz





GC/ekm
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 71 

Expressing support for the Transitional Federal Government of the Somali 

Republic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2007 

Mr. INHOFE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the Transitional Federal Government 

of the Somali Republic. 

Whereas, after the collapse of the Somali government in 

1991, the main judicial system in Somalia devolved into 

a system of sharia-based Islamic courts, which have increased their power to include security and enforcement 

functions; 

Whereas, in 2000, the courts consolidated to form the Islamic 

Courts Union (ICU), which came into conflict with secular warlords in the capitol city of Mogadishu by asserting its ever increasing power; 

Whereas, the ICU is known to have links to Al-Qaeda and 

has provided a safe haven for members of Al-Qaeda; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 71 IS 

Whereas, by June 2006, ICU forces controlled Mogadishu 

and much of southern Somalia, creating a potential 

haven for Islamic terrorists; 

Whereas, in 2004, the Transitional Federal Government of 

the Somali Republic (TFG) was formed in Kenya; 

Whereas, in 2006, the TFG army joined forces with the army 

of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia to sweep 

the ICU from power and, after a string of swift military 

victories, enter Mogadishu; and 

Whereas, the current situation is still volatile, creating a 

short window of opportunity to positively affect Somalia’s 

stability and future status: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the Senate expresses its support for the 

3 Transitional Federal Government of the Somali Re4 public; 

5 (2) the Senate recognizes Ethiopia, particularly 

6 Prime Minister Meles, and Kenya for the noble ef7 forts aimed toward pursuing peace in Somalia and 

8 support for the United States in the War on Terror; 

9 (3) the United States should support and push 

10 efforts for serious multi-party talks aimed at estab11 lishing a national unity government in Somalia; 

12 (4) the United States should take several meas13 ures, at an appropriate time, to promote stability; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 71 IS 

1 (5) assistance from the United States will bet2 ter equip the TFG to face the challenges of restoring 

3 peace to this war-torn country; 

4 (6) the United States should promote foreign 

5 investment in Somalia and facilitate financial and 

6 technical assistance to the TFG; and 

7 (7) the United States should aid the TFG to— 

8 (A) locate and free Somali-owned financial 

9 assets throughout the world; 

10 (B) solicit support from other friendly 

11 countries; and 

12 (C) encourage nongovernmental organiza13 tions to commit more resources and projects to 

14 Somalia. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# 507-/5" 

# ELECTRONICRECORD $*0%mt&

C0A# 06-14-00066-CR OFFENSE: 22.021 

### WilliamJason Pugh v. The State of 

## STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Wood COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 402nd Judicial District Court DATE: 4/15/15 Publish: No TC CASE #: 22,041-2013



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

# CCA# 5b%»IS WilliamJason Pugh v. The State of STYLE: Texas 

### PEP SE FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: O^j/^/^Oir 1UL JUDGE: slAA^tjL^— Petition 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
§ 183.43 Persons capacity: Boats rated for manual propulsion and boats rated for outboard motors of 2 horsepower or less. ( a ) The persons capacity in pounds marked on a boat that is rated for manual propulsion or for motors of 2 horsepower or less must not exceed: ( 1 ) For boats rated for manual propulsion, 90 percent of the maximum weight capacity in pounds; and
( 2 ) For boats rated for motors of 2 horsepower or less, 90 percent of the maximum weight capacity in pounds, less 25 pounds.
( b ) The maximum persons capacity, in whole numbers of persons marked on a boat that is rated for manual propulsion must not exceed the value obtained by adding 32 pounds to the value determined in paragraph (a)(1), dividing the sum by 141, and rounding off the result to the nearest whole number. If the fraction is less than one-half, round down to the next lower integer and if the fraction is equal to or greater than one-half, round up to the next higher whole integer.
( c ) The maximum persons capacity in whole numbers of persons marked on a boat rated for motors of 2 horsepower or less must not exceed the value obtained by adding 32 pounds to the value determined in paragraph (a)(2), dividing the sum by 141, and rounding off the result to the nearest whole number. If the fraction is less than one-half, round down to the next lower whole integer and if the fraction is equal to or greater than one-half, round up to the next higher whole integer.
[CGD 78-034, 45 FR 2031, Jan. 10, 1980]