IN THEUNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT F LH X Y / p D.C.

SOU TH ERN D ISTRICT OF FLO RID A

W EST PALM BEA CH D IVISIO N

SEF 16 2222

DONALDJ.'ntlJMI,, îto7.oI,LJ,jE:'l-îw1.Rtj

Plaint# No.9:22-cv-81294-AMC

V.

Dated:Septem ber16,2022

UN ITED STATES OF AM ERICA,

JURY'ITUALDEMANDED

Defendant

M OVANT-INTERVENOR (PRO SEI-RAJK.PATEL'S

AM EN D ED D KT.87

1,T.E.,T.EIG JK.PATEL,theundersigned m ovant-intervenorprose,in theabovenam ed case,with apendingm otionatDkt.36,herebysubm ittlaisam endedreplytoDefendant-urtitedStatesofAmerica'sResponseatDkt.48zwhichisw ritlentobeanaddidon

toDkt.60(duplicatefilingatDkt.61),orasmyresponsetoDefendm t'sM otionatDkt.

69.L.R.7.1(c)(2)(10pages,gontandback).Amendments.

W HEREAS,''Atlom eyGeneralBrewsterexplainedmoreth> acenturyago,'ltlhere

aretwokindsofofsdaltermsf..-onekindof'term 'referstoaperiodofpersonalservice.

In thatcmse,'theterm isappurtenantto theperson/...Anotherkind of'term 'refersto

aftxedsiotoftimetowhichindividualappointeesareassigned...-rherez'thepersonLsapPurtenanttotheterm/...lnotherw ords,a'term ofoffice'ean eitherrunw1t1:theperson

orwiththecalenanr/'unitedStatesr.Wilson,290F.3d347,353(D.C.Cir.2002)(quoting

Comm'rsoftheDgf.ofcolumbia,170p.Att'yGen.476,476-79(1882):and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 1 of 19
W HEREAS,thePresidendalRecordsAct,44U.S.C.jj2.201-2209,makestheformer

PresidentapartoftheExecudveBranch,and m orespedhcally thePresidency,W ilson,

290F.3d at353& Federnlist78;and,

W lv lkEAs,execudveprivilege''safeguardsthepublicinterestincandid,confident4aldeliberadonsw itlnintlw ExecutiveBranch;itis'fundamentaltotheoperadonofGovernment,'''Trumpv.M azars1.f.5.,LLP,140S.Ct.2019,2032(U.S.2020);artd,

W HEREM ,allPresidentialdata''lis)presumptivelyprivileged,''Nixonv.Sirica,487

F.2d700,716(D.C.Cir.1973/and,

W HERM S,''irtformation subjecttoexecudveprivilegedeserves'thegreatestprotecdonconsistentwiththefairadministradonofjustice,'''M azars,140S.Ct.at2024(quotingUnitedStatesv.Nixon,418U.S.683,715(1974));and,

W HEREAS,''rtlheltighrespectthatisowedtotheofficeoftheChiefExecudve...is

amatterthatshouldinform theconductoftheentireproceedinp''Clintonv.Jones,520'

U.S.681,705,117S.Ct.1636,1650-51(1997),andthatthereisatraditionoffederalcottrts'

affording ''the utm ostdeference to Presidendalresponsibilides Clinton,117 S.Ct.at

1652,/'InreLindsey,158F.3d1263,1280(D.C.Cir.1998)(quotingNixon,418U.S.at710-

11)(internalquotadonm arksomittedl);and,

W HEREAS,''ltlheauthority toprotectnationalsecttrityinformation fallson the

President/'Dep'toftheNavyv.Egan,484U.S.518,527(1988),seealso,e.g.,Mzfm/zyv.Sec'y,

IJ.S.Dep'tofArmy,769Fed.Appx.779,792(111 Cir.2019),&Dkt.69at13;and,

W HEREAS,forpurposesofPresidentialRecordsAct,theincum bentPresidentwho

transidonsto form erPresident,isan ''agent''ofthepeople,Egan,484U .S.at529,Federalist78,& D kt.69at18;and,

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 2 of 19
W HEREAS,theSupremeCottrthasemphasizedthatprivilegeclaim s,''m ustbeconsideredinlightofourltistoriccommi% enttotheruleoflaw''and''ltlheneedtodevelop

a11relevantfactsin theadversarysystem ,''Nixon,418U.S.at708-09& Dkt.69at% and,

W HEREAS,''liln theperformanceofassigned consdtudonaldudes,(Executive

branchloftheGovernmentmustirtitialy intezw ettheConsdtudon,and...-fhePresident'scounsel,asw ehavenoted,readstheCorusdtudon asprovidingan absoluteprivilegeofconh'dentiality forallPresidendalcom m unicatiorusz''Nixon,418 U .S.at703-4,28

U.S.C.j516,& seegeneralyDavidA.Strauss,''PresidentialInterpretadonoftheConsdtutioa''15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-135(1993)1;and,

W HEREAS,in otherwords,''executivebranc.h mustinterprettheCortstitudon beforeitcan decidewhattodoz''seegenerallyStrauss,15CardozoL.Rev.at113-1359and,

W I-IEItEAS,theSupremeCourthas''rejectled)theargumentthatonlyanincumbent

Presidentmayassert''separadon-of-powersclaims,Nixonv.Adm'rofGen.Servs.,433U.S.

425,439(1977);andz

W HEREAS,thereisan intem alseparation ofpowersoninterpretingtheConsdtw

tionwithintheExecutiveBranch;and,

W l-œlkEM zprivilegeand im m tm idesm aybeused to sustain separation ofpow ers

insidebranchesofgovernm entandacrossgovernm entsundertheUnited StatesCorkstitudon;and,

W IIEItEAS,theUnitedStatesDepartm entofStateisresponsibleforinterpretingand

elaboratingontlaePrivilegesandlmmlnitiesClause,U.S.const.art.lV,j2,'

1.DavidA.Strauss,''PresidendallnterpretationoftheConstitudoa''15CardozoL.Rev.113,113-

135 (1993), https;//chicago= bou-nd.uY cago.edu/c'view- content.cp'?referer-

=-&h% sreo =l-&arh.-

clea/oo6&contextzjournalardclesipresidential.

3

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 3 of 19
W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDepartmentofStateshowsitselaboradononthePrivilegesandlm m tm itiesClausein theUnited StatesOrderofPrecedenceby theOfficeof

the ChiefofProtocol,https://- w.state.gov/N -content/uploads/zor /oz/uotedStates-order-of-precedence-Februaa -zozz.pdf(revksedFeb.11,2022)& U.S.const.art.

W ,92;and,

W HEREAS,theUnitedStatesDepar% entofJustice,theAttom eyGeneral,orU.S.

Attom eyJuanGonzaleszdidnotfollow theUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedencedulyestablishedbytheOfficeoftheCitiefofProtocol,Id.;and,

W HEREAS,theincllmbentPresidentoftheUnitedStateshassupportedtheUnited

StatesOrderofPrecedencehousedbytheUrtitedStatesDepartm entofStateOfficeofthe

CltiefofProtocol,which showsthatform erPresidentTnlm poutranksincumbentAttorneyGeneralMerrickGarland,Id.& 3U.S.C.jj301etseq.;and,

W HEREAS,thus,theUrtited StatesDeparM entofStateand theUrtited StatesDepartmentofJusdceareadversariesinoursystem ofruleoflaw,inordertocreateaseparadonofpowersandchecksandbalance,butcf.DoctrineofComitp U.S.corust.art.1V,j

2,& 28U.S.C.j5169and,

W HEREM ,theincumbentPresidentoftheUnited Stateshasnotcleared,norm ay

ratifytmconsdtutionalactstomakethem consdtutional/breac.hofprotocol;and,

W HEREAS,theexecudveDeparfm entsanditsHeadshavebeen ceated,byanAct

ofCongress,and appointedbythePresident,M tIAadviceand consentfa'om theSenate,

2.Underthecom monlawztlaeincum bentKingm aychangeprotocolat-w ilagainstaform er

H eadofStateoraprecedingM onarch;thosevested powersareembeddedintheUnited StatesCortsdttltionand rem ain constant1m 151lawfulyam ended.Besides,asthecom plaintandA ttorneyGeneral'sM errickGarland'spublic,apolidcal,andlegalcommentsshow,currently,ozlyaunitofanExectzdvebranch

hasacled,i.e.theDepartmentofJustke-F.B.l.,ratlaerth= theExecutw'ebranchaswhole.Dkt.1at10.To

nostzrprise,evenagainqtaformerpresident,inordertolegallycondidonthepeacefultransidon of

power,theExectzdvepowerismuchweakerthartofacommonlaw King's.UnitedStatesv.Providence

JournalCo.,485U.S.693,701(1988)(moreth= one''UrtitedStates''is''statllingvl.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 4 of 19
Frq tagv.Comm'r,501U.S.868,886,917(1991)(discussingHeadsandprindpalofficers

oftheexecutivedepartments);and,

W HEREAS,theExecudveBranch's''interpretadonofitsEownlpowerso..isduegreat

respectfrom theothers,''Nixon,418U.S.at703-4;and,

W HEREAS,''(a1lJpowersof1aw ertforcement...areassignedtmderou.rConsdtudon

totheExecudveandtheJudiciarp''Quinnv.UnitedStates,349U.S.155,161(1955).

'IYIEREFOM ,onlyaunitoftheExecudveBranch,thecurrentAtlorneyGeneral,has

broughtchargesagainstform erPresidentTrum pinvioladonoftheinter-w orldngsofthe

execudvebranchprotocol,orderedbytheincumbentPresidentBiden,ashousedbyPresidentBiden'ssubordinates,who arealso eithertheAtlorney General'ssuperiorsorcoequalsonthesubject-matter,intheUrtitedStatesDeparM entofState.

FURTHERMORE,thePresident,thecom ts,ortheExecudveBranchcannotm utedistinctionsofoffice,person,statezandgovernm ent,astheyareanelaboradonoftheUnited

StatesCortstitudon Privilegesand lm mllnidesClause,whic.h laysoutthestructureand

lanesofenforcem ent.

W HEREAS,inorderforafederaldistrictcotrtof1aw tohavepersonaljurisdicdon,

tmderFed.R.Civ.12(b)(2),tradidonalnotiorusof''naturaljusdcez''''fairplap''and''substandaljustice''mustataltimenotbeviolated,McDonaldv.M abee,243U.5.90,92(1917),

JointAnti-FascistComm.v.M cGrath,341U.S.123,123(1951),Breithauptv.Abram,352U.S.

432,435(1957)(shocktheconsdence,tradidonalnodonsoffairplayanddecencp indicia

ofnotapeacefultranqition ofpowercausedby Defendant-Dolisaviolation oftheconscience),Gonzalesv.UnitedStates,348U.S.407,412(1955)(''lznderlyingconceptsofprocedttralregulnrityandbasicfairplay''),Int'1ShoeCo.v.Washington,326U.S.310,324&

326(1945),UnitedStatesv.Lovasco,431U.S.783,796(1977)(dueprocessembodies''fundamentalconcepdonsofjusdce''and''thecommllnity'ssenseoffairplayanddecencf')

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 5 of 19
(sccFederalist77,UnitedStatesasacommunity),Cnty.ofSacramentov.Lewis,523U.S.

833,847(1998)(conscience-shockingbehavioris''so'brutal'and'offensive'thatit(does)

notcomportw1t14tradidonalideasoffairplayanddecency.'')(abuseofexem tivepower)

(decenciesof''dvilized conductz''epitomizedinU.S.const.art.lV,j2)(bowing and

curtsyamongstandtostateactorsortheeffectinottrcommllnity),& Sessionsv.Dimaya,

138S.Ct.1204,1212(2018)(requiredbyboth''ordinarynotionsoffairplayandthesettled

rulesoflaw.'');and,

WHEREAS,traditionalnotlonsofnaturaljusticestatesaformerT.H.(T.E.)President

oftheUnitedStates(T.E.PresidentoftheUrtitedStatesforaldocumentsforeignaffairs),

from theNaturalState,ismorefitth= thecurrentcout't(judgeandDefendant)andthe

NaturalOrderdem andsthattheincum bentAttorneyGeneralyieldtopressingcharges

againstPlaintiff,ourform erH ead ofState,seeUnited StatesO rderofPrecedence-urtited

StatesDep'tofState-ofsceoftheCltiefofProtocol,U.S.const.art.lvzj2,& Dkt.60at2,

5,5n.3,& 7;and,

WHEREAS,traditionalnotiortsofbasicfairplay andsubstantialjusdcehavebeen

violated,seee.g.Obergefelv.Hodges,576U.S.644,742(2015)(laarshtreatmentisnotfair

play)(gaysandlesbianshavebeendertiedtheNaturalOrder,pursuanttotheirachievem entsindvilsocietp asthewealthiestcomm unitp particularly,gaymen,intheUnited

States;thesam eillnesshasentered stateand govermnentalinsdtudorus,preventingthe

NaturalOrder,includingingoverningtheDefendant'sdedsions)tplaindffhasbeendenied rightfulplacein theafterm ath ofltishonor'sincumbency asPresidentofUnited

Statesp& Pet.forW ritofCel't.*58-9,Patelv.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202-/and,

3.https:/ke c-prod-requests.s3-us-west-z.o r onaws.com/W age-Gap-Appenix.pdf.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 6 of 19
W HEREAS,even w ith explicitinformed consentthePlaintiffcannotavailhim self

beforetlziscourtbecauseltisavailm entcannotovercom etheviolationt'radidonalnotions

offairplay,naturaljustice,andsubstantialjusticeasappliedtothecourtandanypossible

rulingbytltiscourt,U.S.const.art.lV,j2& seealsoUnitedStatesOrderofPrecedenceUnitedStatesDep'tofState-officeoftheClaiefofProtocol;and,

W HEREAS,tltiscourtcannotattachpersonaljurisdicdontothePlaintiffasitwould

violatethetradidonalnodortsoffai.rplay,naturaljustice,andsubstantialjusticezand,

thus,itsopinionwouldonlybeadvisory;and,

W HEREAS,inaddidon,thecorollarytoPlaino 'sform erPresidendalprivilege,im -

munitp isthecourt'slimitedjudicialreview,Federalist78,U.S.const.art.lV,j2,art.I11

(originalintent),& amend.V.M arburyv.M adison,SU.S.137(1803).

THEREFORE,thisCourtshoulddismisssuasponteunderFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2),as

theCottrtdoesnothavepersonaljurisdictionforPlaintiff,orFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6),for

failuretostateaclaim uponwltichreliefcanbegranted,asthereisnoenforcem entmechnnism torequirethePlaintiff,theform erHeadofStateandform erPresident,whoisalso

Privileged,pertheNaturalState,andisIm mlm e,pertheNaturalStatetoo;thedeficienciescanortlybecuredby new chargesbroughtdirectly by theincumbentPresident,by

lnisowncounselor,ratltert14> theinctmbentAtlom eyGeneral.

FURTITERMORE,thenodonsofnaturaljusdce,fairplay,andsubstandaljusticebuttresscastledoctrine,asgenerally applied,andPlaintiff'scastlecantmiquely,alongw1t14

the pastPresidentszcan w ithstand allforces exceptthose directly an.d cortstitudonally

comm andedbytheincllmbentPresident,c.g.UnitedStatesSecretServiceorUnitedStates

Arm edandSpaceForce.SeeDkt.60at2,5,5n.3,& 7.Thisisalsobecausedue process

cannotoverride aPrivilege orImmunity,and substantivedue processisconsiderate of

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 7 of 19
Privilegesand Immunities,perthe Federalistand Anti-Federalistcontractofthe Billof

Rights,and the interestofthe Foundersand Amendersto preserve the culture ofour

Nation.U.S.const.art.IV,j2& amend.XIV,j2,cI.1,'Lovasco,431U.S.at796,'Federalist80(''ItmaybeesteemedthebasisoftheUnion,that'thecitizensofeachStateshal

beentitledto aItheprivilegesand immunitiesofcitizensoftheseveralStates.''And if

itbeajustprinciplethateverygovernmentOUGHTTO POSSESSTHEMEANSOFEXECUTING ITSOW N PROVISIONSBY ITSOW N AUTHORlW .'');Pet.forW ritofCert.*

58-9,Patelv.Unftedstateà,No.22-5280(U.S.202.2,.& compareU.S.const.art.IV,jj

1-2,'wfthU.S.const.art.VI,j1referringtoArliclesofConfederation(1781),ar't.IV,paras.

1& 3(''Thebettertosecureand perpetuatemutualfriendshipandintercourseamong

thepeopleofthedifferentStatesinthisUnion(i.e.,DoctrineofComityinU.S.const.art.

IV,j2),thefreeinhabitantsofeachoftheseStates,paupers,vagabonds,andfugitives

iom justiceexcepted,shalbeentitledtoaIprivilegesandimmunitiesoffreecitizensin

the severalStatesi...provided also thatno imposition,dutiesorrestrictionshallbe Iaid

byanyState,onthe propertyofthe United States,oreitherofthem.''//''FuIlfaith and

creditshalbegivenineachoftheseStatestotherecords,acts,andjudicialproceedings

ofthe courtsand magistratesofeveryotherState.'')(lvmagistrates''replaced with ''citizen'')(seeDkt.21at13)(seea/soPate/v.Unfted States,No.1:21-cv-02004-LAS(Fed.

Cl.202- ),Dkt.1at9-10n.6/.

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 8 of 19
UNDERFED.R.CIV P.M ,lhaveacom monquesdonoflaw orfactorinterestinthe

transacdon becauseafavorablerulingtotheDefendantcanviolatem yExcellencies,the

stylepdtles,and my careerand statesmaluhip by extension ofthisrlling amongstlicensed Governm entalactors,local,state,federal,and internadonal,whomightsym pathizeG tIAthisCourtunconsdtudonally.

W HEREAS,theSuprem eCourthasheld thataform erPresidentm ay notsuccessfttlly assertexecutiveprivilegeagainstreview by ''theveryExecutiveBranch inwhose

nam etheprivilegeishw oked,''Nixon,433U.S.at447-48& Dkt69at8;4and,

W HEREAS,execudvePrivilegeandexecutivelm mtm ityarecorollaries,butdistinct

concepts,U.S.const.art.lV,j2& amend.XIV,j1,c1.2,'and,

W HEREAS,asserdngonenecessarilyimputestheasserdonoftheother,J#.;and,

W l-vltM s,form erUnited StatesPresidentTnlm p m ay assertexecudveTm m unity

from Urtited StatesGovernm entalforcewltich isnottm derthecomm and oftheincum -

bentU nited StatesPresident,Id.;and,

W HEREAS,inthehappeningsrelatedtoNixon,433U.S.at425,incllmbentPresident

GeraldFordwasinfimatelyinvolvedinprosecutingformerPresidentNixon,Id.&cf.Dkt.

1at10;and,

W HEREAS,here,asllnlikein thehappeningsrelated toNixon,433U.S.at425,the

incumbentPresidentisnotinfim ately itw olved againstthe prosecudon ofPresident

Biden,PHH Com.r.ConsumerFinancialProtectionBureau,839F.3d1,12-13(D.C.Cir.2016)

4.AnF.B.I.cannotclaim execudvePrivilegeagainsttheincum bentAttorney General,butaformerPresidentcanclaim executivePrivilege(i.e.PresidentialPrivilege)agairlsttheincuinbentAtlorney

General.RespedivelyrtheindependentconceptofexecutiveIm munity applies,which favorstheform er

Presidentagainstthem cum bentAttom eyGeneral.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 9 of 19
(M adisonianpresidentialcontrol),seeM organv.UnitedStates,304U.S.1,2-2(1938)(holdingthatitis''notthefunctionofthecolzrttoprobethementalprocessesoftlte(Executive1''),andDkt.1at10;and,

W HEREAS,here,thetopicsofdocllmentsarerelated to foreign policp llnlikein

Nixon,433U.S.at425,where,thedoctlm entswererelatedtodomesticpolicy;and,

W HEREM ,morespedficallyandmaterialy,aformerPresident/l-leadofStateoutrankstheincumbentAttom eyGeneralinforeignreladonsand diplom adcm atler,wltich

areexclusively reservedforthePresident'srecognidon,seegeneralyProvidenceJozfrrlcl,

485U.S.at701(morethanone''UnitedStates''is''startlingv);and,

W HEREAS,theinclzmbentPresident,theUrtited StatesOrderofPrecedenceduly

establishedbytheOfficeoftheCltiefofProtocolzandthePresidendalRecordsActshow

thattheformerpresidentscarryon offidaldudes,wltic.h comew1:14om nipresentprivilegesand im mtmities,wlzidaare absolute exceptatagainstan incumbentPresident,

Nixon,418U.S.at703-4& Scheuerv.Rhodes,416U.S.232,239,241,244,& 248,(1974/and,

W I-IEREAS,theCortsdtutionalpowerofexecudvePrivilegeand/orexecudve1mmllnityofaform erPresident,thus,m aybelawhllly assertedagainsttheincllm bentDepartmentofJusdce,U.S.const.art.lV,j2& amend.XIV,j1,c1.2,M urrayv.Bush,No.

06-C-0781*1(E.D.W is.Aug.31,2006)(''whethertheactionisfrivolousormalidous,or

seeksrelieffromanimmuneplrfy,orfailstostateaclaim onwltic.hreliefmaybegranted./'l

(italicsadded)(intemaldtationsomitted);cf.28U.S.C.j1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);Wiliamsp.

Holmes,No.1:17-cv-00799-KOB*1(N.D.Ala.Sep.5,2017:Malcolmv.CifyofMiami,No.

22-w-20499-1*NG/D *2,4,&6(S.D.Fla.Mar.7,2022);&Listerv.Dm'fofTreasung,408F.3d1309(101 Cir.2005:and,

W I-IEREAS,thePlaintiffcanlaw fullypossessthedisputedUnitedStatesrecords,44

U.S.C.j2202;and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 10 of 19
W HEREAS,theFed.R.Civ.P.8(c)(1)allow fortheaffirmativedefensesofillegality

(Defendant'splay in obtainingPresidendalRecords),license(U.S.const.art.lV,j2),

laches(Defendantshouldhaveactedquickeriftrulysuspidousofnadonalsecurity),or

tmcleanhands(DefendantshouldhaveinvolvedtheincumbentPresidentoftheUnited

States);and,

W - ltEAsztltisCotrtisinCom itywithboth Plaindffand Defendant,andhasthe

privilegeofservingeachpartyinltis/her/theirindividualcapacitp DoctrineofComitp

U.S.const.art.lV,j2.

THEREFORE,thePlaintiffisim mtmefrom prosecudon9om theDefendant,andthe

Courtshouldrettm allrecordstoplaindff,PresidentTnlm p,and orderchargesagainst

TheHonorableGarlandforconversion,''treason''//'wr''/''attackz''andrebellionorinsttrrection.U.S.const.art.1H,j3918U.S.C.j23819&ProvidenceJournal,485U.S.at701.

FURTHERMORE,tm dertheConsdtudonalSction,wlxich starts,atam inimllm,with

thecorporatechaz-tersmendoned intheDedarationofIndependence(1776),thelocal,

excellentcorporationsand otherlocalauthoritieshavedevolved powerto theFederal

Sovereigzum uch morethantheSisterStateshavetotheFederalSovereign;thus,theinterestin thetrnnsacfon isacheck on theDevolved Sovereignty,Faithfully ordered by

me,theintervenor,andasatn payer.U.S.corust.al't.lV,jj1-2& art.W ,j1;Federalist

78;&42U.S.C.jj2000bbetseq.SeealsoW ltiteHouseOfficeofIntergovemmentalAffairs,

htt-ps:/kwww .whitehouse.gov/iga/.

W > ftM s,barring subordinateExecutive Branch from review ing and using the

classified recordsforcrim inalinvesdgatespurposesisam eaningfulw ay ofprotecting

''theconfidendaliiyofPresidentialcom mllnicadonsz''Nixon,418U.S.at705& contra.Dkt.

69at10;and,

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 11 of 19
W HEREAS,thereasonsPresidentsorthecotzrtsallow independentpersonnelacross

theIntelligence Comm unity to review thevery sam e recordsforotherdosely related

purposesbutnottherem ainderoftheExecudveBranch donothavetoberevealed in

ordertoprotecttheconfidendalityofPresidentialRecords,Nixon,418U.S.at705;and,

W HEREAS,tecbnocratsarethepersonnelacosstheIntelligenceCom mtmitywho

usuallyreceivetheserecordsandwhosenarrow objectivesarepredselycodified,llnlike

in thenot-independentExecutiveBranch werepardsans,partym embers,form erm em -

bersofCongress,andbureaucratswhoareaccountabletovaryinginterests,such asforeign Heads ofState and inter-governmentalorganizadorts and thoselaierarclzies,are

likelytoreceiveandbeexposedtheserecords;and,

W HEREAs,an affirm anceofthedefaultprotectiortistruleofPresidendalRecords

willalow theRepublictoremainOneandintact,Nixon,418U.S.at705,Providencelournal,

485U .S.at701,N ixon,433U .S.atM 7-9,& Hein v.Freedom From Religion Found.,Inc,551

U.S.587(2007)(Rather,theywere''createdentirelywithintheexecufvebranch...byPresidendalexecudveorder.''(quolingFreedom From ReligionFound.,Inc.v.Chao,433F.3d

989,997(7thCiT.2006)/and,

W HEREAS,theDeparM entofJusticeisnotanindependentagencyoftheExecudve

Branch;and,

W HEREAS,here,the''trial''isofaform erPresident,wltichw asnotinitiatedbythe

incum bentPresident;and,

W HEREAS,theenforcem entofN ixon,418U .S.at705isdifferentduetotlaeadvancementoftedm ology;and,

THEREFORE,PreventingtheUnitedStatesDeparlm entofJusdce9om gainingaCcesstotlaem aterialPresidendalRecordsislaw ful,asw ellastheappointmentofthespecialm aster,butthePresidendalRecordsareproperlyreturnedtoPresidentTnlm patthe

12

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 12 of 19
earliestconvenience;ifnot,atleasta copy ofa1lrecordszasthePlaintiffm aintainshis

Prestlm ptionofcorrecm essUT:dIprovenothenvise.

FG TITERMORE,thistransactioncotldextenttolocalgovernm ents,asetofDevolversofSovereigntp andinterferew1f.11localjurisdictions'recordkeepingpracdcesandthe

privilegesandimmtmidesoftheiragents,includingwhenthosejttrisdicdonsweredem arcatedin anotherstate.

W HEREAS,Dkt.69at10-11equivocatesabouttheExecutiveBranclwgenerallywith

themorespecificterminologiesofexecudvePrivilegesand/orImmlnitiesappliedtothe

ExecudveBranch-incumbent-presidentandExecudveBranclwform er-president;and,

W HEREM Defendantisunpersuasively argtling,thatin addidontoitstrespassto

a form er President's castle,its Governm entalunit's needs are of m ore nadonal im -

portancethan thestatusquoestablishedbytzeExec'utiveBranch-incllmbent-president,

whichdoesnotdiscrim inateagainsttheExecudveBrO ch-fo= er-president-ple e f,and

m adepubliclyavailablethroughtheUrtitedStatesDepnrfm entofState-officeoftheCltief

ofProtocol(whethertheExecudveBrr G -Go mbent-Attom ey-Generz isastateactoror

a governmentalactoris irrelevantdue to the orderofprecedence and the Executive

Branch-incumbent-president'sestablishm entofthenationalsecurity agenda;nonetheless,thesedistincdonscannotbemuted),Egan,484U.S.at5279seealso,e.g.,M umhy,769

Fed.Appx.at792(''TheauthoritytoprotectnadonalseclArityinformadonfallsonthe

PresidentIdirectlyl.v),& Dkt.69at13;and,

W M ltM s,thePresidentisartagent,in theterm softhePresidentialRecordsAG

andFederalist78;and,

W HEREAS,thecottrtsmustprotectthePresidentfrom aggression from tmknown

sourceswithinExecutiveBranch,wltichconcurrentlypoliticallyanswertovaryinginterests,Dkt.69at18quoting Egan,484U .S.at529;and,

13

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 13 of 19
W HEREAS,thecoudsmustbesensidvetotheinter-workingsandinter-politicsof

theexecutivebranch;

W HEREAS,hypothedcally,Execudve Brr G -G c= bent-Attom ey-Generz-DolD CI-FBIcouldhavebeen denied accesstoPresidendalRecordsofExecutiveBranch-form er-president--frump byExecutlveBranG -G= bent-president-Biden;and,

W HEREM ,therefore,thecurrenthappeningsin thecase-at-hand areappeasem ent

tovitalpartsoftlaeGovernmentandpossiblepolidcalpardesandfactlonsthePresident

mustappease,PHH Cprp,839F.3dat1& 12-13(AstheSupremeCottrthmsexplained,

otrConstitudon ''w asadoptedtoenablethepeopletogovem them selves,O oughtheir

electedleadersz''and theConstitudon''requiTesthataPresidentchosenbytheentireNationoverseetheexecution ofthe1aws.'')(quotingFreeEntemriseFundv.Pub.Co.Acct.

OversightBd.,561U.S.477,499(2010))9UnitedStatesv.Arthrex,Inc,No.19-1434*23,594

U.S. (2021)(Roberts,C.J.,TheConsdtudonalltierarchyreqllires''theexerciseofexecudvepower(toremainlaccotmtabletothepeople.v);& Dkt.69at18quotingEgan,484

U.S.at527(tmauthorizedpersons);and,

W HEItEAS,thereisruleoflaw,theCourtsm ustprotecttheExecudveBranch-inctlmbent-presidentandtheExecudveBranch-form er-presidentfrom aggressions;and,

W HEREAS,thecurrentactsareaggressiortsagainsttheUnitedStateszfoundinsom e

W estem l-lemisphere's-andSisterCommonlaw jttrisdidions'-governmentalfasltionfor

coupsdetat.

THEREFORE,theCourtshouldenterjudgementinfavorofPlaintiff,whoisimmune

from prosecudonbytheDefendant-o .Gonzalez.

14

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 14 of 19
W HEREAS,inadditiontoDkts.zl,36,and60,thePoliticalQuesdonDockine,under

Bakerv.Carr,369U.S.186,217(1962)(atextuallydemonskableconsdtudonalcommitmentoftheissuetoacoordinatepolidcaldeparM ent);and,

W HEREAS,pursuanttothePolidcalQuesdonDockinetheissueisreservedforthe

Presidencydirectly,fortheinterestofm aintainingPresidendalAutonomy(i.e.inanearlierdraftoftheDeclaradon ofIndependenceof1776,ThomasJefferson addressed the

Grievancesagainstthe Parliam ent,wltic.h he thoughtcaused the denialofthe Olive

BranchTreatpbut,TheKingwasstilgivingpowertoParliament),compareOriginalDraft

(''weutterlydissolveallpolidcalconnecdonwltichm ayheretoforehavesubsistedbetween usand thepeopleorparliamentofGreatBritain:and finally w edo assertand

declarethesecoloniestobefreeandindependentstates,andthatasfreeandindependent

states,theyhavefullpowertolevywac concludepeace,contractalliances,establishcom -

merce,andtodoal1otherac'tsandthingswhichindependentstatesmayofrightdo.'')

withFinalDraftpand,

W HEREAS,RobertYates,who refused to sign the United States Constitudon

thoughtthatthejudidarywouldbeable''tomould''theroleofthepresidencp6and,

5.https:/kteachl'ngamericanhlestog.org/do= ent/rough-draz-of-dae-declarauon-of-Gdependence/.

6.https://- .hedtage.org/courts/report/agaH t-l'udicial-supremacy-dxe-founders-r d-tlxelimits-the-courtsC'Everybodyofmeninvestedw1t14offkes''Yatesobserved,''aretenadousofpowen''

Moreover,thisloveofpowerwould''influence''judges''toextendtheirpower,andirtceasetheirrights/'

w 1t1:theresukthatthecourtswilltendto''givesuch am eaningtotheConstitutionin allcaseswhereit

canpossiblybedone,asw illenlargetlaesphereofdAeirauthon'tp ''...7'heendresultofa1ltlzisw otzldbea

SupremeCourt* t1:powertorulethecountryinthemostimportantmatlersaccordingtoitsownwilltonotonlyexceeditsauthoz'itybuttousurp others'authority.''Ihispowen''Yatessaid,''wilenable''the

justicesoftheSupremeCourt''topmlflfthegovernmentinfoalmostfuzpshapefhc.yplease.''...Watesfarthercontended thattheSuprem eCourtw ouldnotonlybesuprem eoverallothe.rcourts,buttbatitw ouldsin fact,

bethesuprem epow erinthegovem m enttobecreatedby theConstitution.Thisssfprcrflcy,Yatescontended,wouldfollowh'om theCourt'sptlu?crofsetlingforallpfhcrpoliticaladors@htrauthoritativezrlctmflzygof

theConstitution.TheSuprem eCotzrt,heobsew edf''hasthepower,in thelastresortttodeterminea11quesdonsthatm ay ariseirtthecotzrseoflegaldiscusslon,onthem eaningandconstructlonoftheConstitw

don.'').

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 15 of 19
WHEREAS,''Ehhlmanexperienceteachesthatthosewhoexpectpublicdissemination oftheirremarksm ay w elltem percandorwith aconcem forappearancesand for

theirownintereststotltedetrimentofthededsionmakingprocess...la)Presidentand

thosewhoassisthim m ustbefreetoexplorealternativesintheprocessofshapingpolicies

and m akingdedsionsand to do soin aw ay thatm any would betmwillingtoexpress

exceptprivatelp ''Nixon,418U .S.at705 & 708;and,

W HEREAs,''lilndesigningthestructureofottrGovernmentanddividingandatlocatingthesovereignpoweramongthreeco-equalbranches,theFramersoftheConstitudon soughttoprovideacomprehensivesystem ,buttheseparatepozpcrswerenotintended

tooperatewithabsoluteindependence,''Nixon,433U.S.at442-3(quotingYoungstozvnSheet

& TubeCo.v.Sawyer,343U.S.579(1952)/and,

W I-IEREM ,theAttom ey Generalm ightbeappropriateifCongress'interestswere

violatedw1t1:thePresidentialRecordsAct,butchId.,2U.S.C.jj192& 271-2881%&Andersonv.Dzfnn,19U.S.204(1821)(onlywhenCongress'interestsareviolated,theSegreant-at-Armsdoestheenforcement;seegeneralyTitle2oftheUnitedStatesCode).

THEREFORE,theCourtshouldenterjudgement,tmderFed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(2)or

(b)(6),infavorofPlaintifzwhoisimmtmefrom prosecudonbytheDefendant-o .Gonzalez,and advisethatprosecutionism ostproperfrom theincumbentPresidenthimself

orhishonor'scotmselor,ioe.CotmselortothePresident(MT.SteveRicchetti,J.D.),butnot

theAttorneyGeneral(TheHon.MerrickGarland,J.D.).Cf.WhiteHouseGeneralCounselor(M r.StuartF.Delerp J.D.).InreLindsq,158F.3dat1280-2(W lziteHouseGeneral

CotmseltmderthecommandoftheinclmbentPresidentv.DOJ).Federalist78.A1ldocllm entsshouldbereturnedtoPlaintiff.

INTl-IEALTERNA'I'IVE,thecourtmaydismissunderFed.R.Civ.P.12*)47).

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 16 of 19
IN Tl'IEALTERNATIVE,sincetheDefendant'satltsareunconsdtudonaland cannot

beratifiedtobecom econsdtudonal,asDefendantom ittedtheincum bentpresident-l-lead

ofStateand-l-leadofGovernm entagainsttheincumbentPresident'sownOrderforProtocol,thecouz'tm ay dismissand rule in favorofPlaindfffortheDefendant'sunclean

hands.

IN1aIEALTERNATIVE,thecotrtm ayissuean OrdertoShow CausetotheDefendantforlaw enforcementjurisdiction.

ATALLCOSTS,thisCourtshould avoidcreatingaslipperyslopesothattheincumbentPresidentwillbesubjecttoarrestbytheinctmbentAtlorneyGeneral,who,but,

servesatthehonor'spleasttre,orcreateanunconsdtutionalautonomy ofexecudvedeparM ents,whichwillnotbeaccountabletothePeople,-or,som etimes,totheirvarying

interests-theepitomeofexecutivetyranny.

''(A1prose(modon),howeverinartfulypleaded,mustbeheldtolessstringent

standardsth> form alpleadingsdraftedbylaw yers.''Ericksonv.Pardus,551U.S.89,94

(2007).

lusemyConsdtutionalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknow ingfrom m yundergraduateand 1aw schoolzjttrisdodorcandidacp educadons,and politicalofficesand

from readinglaw outsideofform alschoolingforthewritinganddiscussiorts,argtlm ents,

andmodorusofthesefilings,seeDkt.21at5& 20andsupra,p.18(signaturelinel.

lm oveto reirustatem y M otion forIFP atDkt.22.

Respectfullly subm itted,

17

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 17 of 19
/s/RajK.Patel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(prosej

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion County

317-450-6651(cel1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

J.D.Candidate,NokeDameL.Sch.2015-2017

President/smdentBodyPresident,StudentGov'tAss'nof

EmoryU.,Inc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

Sm dentBodyPresident,BrownsburgCm ty.S(:h.

Corp./president,Brownsbm gl-lighSch.StudentGov't

2009-2010(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.9om theNotreDameL.Sch.StudentB.Ass'ntothe

Ind.St.B.Ass'n 2017

DeputyRegionalDirector,Yotm gDem ocratsofAm o-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Founder& ViceChair,Ind.l-tighSch.Dem ocrats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.tlndep.l,OxfordC.Republicansof

Em ory U .,lnc.2011-2012

18

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 18 of 19
Y

rl..

*

CERTIH CATE O F SERV ICE

1certifythatIservedacopyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)ReplytoDkt.69on

09/16/2022tobelow individualsviathee-mail:

JamesM .Trusty

IFRAH,PLLC JuanAntonioGonzalez

1717PennsylvardaA vezN W ,Suite650 UM TED STA TESATTORN EY

W ashington,DC 20006 99NE 41 Skeet,81 Floor '

202-852-5669 M iam i,Fl33132

Email:jtrustyGfraltlaw.com Telephone:(305)961-9001

Em o :y'uan.antoO o.go= alez@usdol'.gov

Lindsey H alligan

511SE51 Avenue Jay1.Brattsflhief

FortLauderdale,Florida33301 Cotm terintem gence& ExportControl

720-435-2870 Secdon N at'lSecut'ityD iv.

Em ail:lindseyhalligan@outlookcom 950PennsylvaniaAvenue,N W

W ashington,D .C.20530

ChristopherM ichaelKise (202)233-0986

CltrisKise&Assodates,P.A. jay.brattz@usdoj.gov

201EastParkAve.Ste,51 Floor

Talahassee,FL32301 rresidentJoeBiden

(850)270-0566 c/oM arinaM .Kozmycz,AssodateGen.

chris@cldse.net Cotmsel

TheE.O.P.attheW ltiteHouse

M .Evan Corcoran 1600PennsylvaniaA venueN W

Silverm an,Thom pson,Slutkin,& W hite, w ashington, D .C.20500

LLC Phone:202-457-1414

400EastPrattStreet,Stite900 (REDACTED)

Ballim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

ecorcoran@silverm r l ompson.com

D ated:Septem ber16,2022

Respecdllllysubm itted

/s/RajPatel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(ProSe4

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion County

317-450-6651(cel1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

19

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 19 of 19