alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>

                                                        Exhibit 11(b)

		
                                 ACCESS CORPORATION 
                      CALCULATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE 
                             AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT 
		
                                                         Nine  Months Ended 
                                                              January 31, 
                                                         1996        1995
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>
		
NET EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES AND		
  COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT:		
         Net Earnings                                    $ 158,926     $ 144,701
		
        Preferred Dividend                                  79,464          -   
		
       Net Earnings Applicable to Common Shares and 		
       Common Share Equivalent                           $  79,462     $ 144,701 
		
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY NET EARNINGS PER		
  COMMON SHARE AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT:		
       Average Number of Common Shares and Common		
       Share Equivalent Outstanding                      4,865,559     4,865,559 
		
PRIMARY NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE AND		
  COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT:		
     Net Earnings per Common Share and Common Share		
     Equivalent after Discontinued Operations            $    0.02     $    0.03 
                                                         =========     =========
<FN>
a)  Common Share Equivalent have not been included as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive or dilution		
  is less than 3%		
		
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 727 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 727

    Honoring the victims of the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 on the 
                 twentieth anniversary of the tragedy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2008

    Mrs. Clinton (for herself, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. 
Menendez) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Honoring the victims of the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 on the 
                 twentieth anniversary of the tragedy.

Whereas, on December 21, 1988, 259 passengers and crew members on board Pan 
        American Airways flight 103, and 11 people on the ground in Lockerbie, 
        Scotland, were killed by a terrorist's bomb;
Whereas 189 people of the United States and nationals from 20 other countries 
        were victims of this heinous attack;
Whereas the families and friends of the victims of this tragedy have suffered 
        immeasurable losses;
Whereas people around the world actively have worked to diminish the possibility 
        of future terrorist attacks;
Whereas in 2003, Libya accepted responsibility for Libyan officials' involvement 
        in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103, denounced terrorism, and vowed to 
        abandon its weapons program;
Whereas, on October 31, 2008, almost 20 years after the terrorist attack, Libya 
        completed delivery of long-awaited compensation to the families of the 
        victims of the bombing of Pan Am flight 103; and
Whereas nothing can replace the loved ones lost in the attack, and the United 
        States must never forget the victims of this crime: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates December 21, 2008, as ``Twentieth 
        Anniversary of Remembrance for the Victims of the Bombing of 
        Pan Am Flight 103 Day''; and
            (2) conveys the most sincere condolences to the families, 
        friends, and communities of the victims of the attack on Flight 
        103.
                                 <all>
```
Age my way!

acl.gov/oam
Program Instructions

AOA-PI-99-01 June 17, 1999

TO : STATES ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1965, AS 

AMENDED

SUBJECT : Certification on Maintenance of Effort for Fiscal Year 1998

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES: 45 CFR 1321.49; and Section 309(c) of the Older Americans 

Act, as Amended

This program instruction requests the authorized official in each state agency on aging to submit a 

certification on maintenance of effort under Title III of the Older Americans Act for fiscal year 1998. As 

set forth in 45 CFR 1321.49, the state agency maintenance of effort level is to be determined 

annually.

In order to avoid a penalty, each fiscal year the State Agency, to meet the required nonfederal share 

applicable to its allotments under this part, shall spend under the State plan for both services and 

administration at least the average amount of state funds it spent under the plan for the three 

previous fiscal years. If the State Agency spends less than this amount, the Assistant Secretary 

reduces the State's allotments for supportive and nutrition services under this part by a percentage 

equal to the percentage by which the State reduced its expenditures.

In reporting the amount of state expenditures for the maintenance of effort requirement, states may 

include expenditures incurred under the cost allocation plan for the state agency. The authorized 

official in each state agency is requested to certify to the Administration on Aging the amount of state 

resources expended in fiscal year 1998 to meet the maintenance of effort requirements under Title III 

of the Older Americans Act, and whether that amount was or was not equal to the required 

maintenance of effort level.

Attached is a certification form which has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). The certification form must be signed by the authorized state agency official and submitted to 

the Regional Administrators, Administration on Aging, no later than July 30, 1999.

Jeanette C. Takamura

Assistant Secretary for Aging

DUE DATE: Due July 30, 1999, to Regional Administrators, Administration on Aging.

ATTACHMENT: Certification of Maintenance of Effort Form OMB-0980-0180

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS regional offices.
§ 175.115 Exceptions. The following persons need not comply with § 175.110; however, each must carry on board visual distress signals suitable for night use, selected from the list in § 175.130 or § 175.135, in the number required, between sunset and sunrise: ( a ) A person competing in any organized marine parade, regatta, race, or similar event;
( b ) A person using a manually propelled boat; or
( c ) A person using a sailboat of completely open construction, not equipped with propulsion machinery, under 26′ in length.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2964-006, Michigan]


City of Sturgis; Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental 
Assessment

January 14, 2000.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for relicensing of 
the Sturgis Hydroelectric Project, located on the St. Joseph River in 
St. Joseph County, Michigan, and has prepared a draft Environmental 
Assessment (DEA) for the project. In the DEA, the Commission's staff 
has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the existing 
project and has concluded that approval of the project, with 
appropriate environmental protection measures, would not constitute a 
major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426. The DEA also may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to David P. Boergers, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Room 1-A, 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Sturgis Hydroelectric Project No. 
2964-006'' to all comments. For further information, please contact 
Patrick Murphy at 202-219-2659.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1431 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial Officer ofAeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form  10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the periodended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

 
|        |   |   | /s/ John  Adamovich, Jr.  |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |                      |   |   |   |
|   |   |   | Name: John Adamovich, Jr. |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |                      |   |   |   |
|   |   |   | Date: November 8, 2006    |   |   |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporatedand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
China Biologic Products Inc.: Exhibit 4.4 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Letter of Undertaking


To: Essence International Investment Limited


June 6, 2012

Dear Sirs: 

We refer to the warrant numbered “015/A” (the “Warrant”)
issued to Essence International Investment Limited (the “Holder”) by
China Biologic Products, Inc. (the “Company”). In connection with the
Holder’s exercise of the Warrant to acquire 750,000 shares of common stock of
the Company (the “Warrant Shares”), the Company hereby undertakes to,
upon issuance of a share certificate representing the Warrant Shares by the
Company to the Holder, use its reasonable best efforts to register or qualify or
cooperate with the Holder in connection with the registration or qualification
(or exemption from the registration or qualification) of the Warrant Shares for
the resale by the Holder under the securities or Blue Sky laws of such
jurisdictions within the United States as the Holder reasonably requests in
writing (including via e-mail) and to do any and all other acts or things
reasonably necessary to enable the disposition in such jurisdictions of the
Warrant Shares; provided, that the Company shall not be required to qualify
generally to do business in any jurisdiction where it is not then so qualified,
subject the Company to any material tax in any such jurisdiction where it is not
then so subject or file a general consent to service of process in any such
jurisdiction. 

Very truly yours, 

China Biologic Products, Inc.


	
    By:    
	/s/ Ming Yang 
	  	Name: 	Ming Yang 
	  	Title: 	Interim Chief Financial Officer 
	  	  	& Compliance Officer
§ 25.603 Claims payable. A claim for death, personal injury, or damage to or loss of real or personal property under this subpart is payable when caused by a military member or a civilian employee of the Coast Guard: ( a ) Incident to the use of a vehicle of the United States at any place; or
( b ) Incident to the use of any other property of the United States on a government installation.
<PAGE>
                  EXHIBIT (24)




                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                        -----------------

     Each of the undersigned directors of New England Power Company (the
"Company"), individually as a director of the Company, hereby constitutes and
appoints John G. Cochrane, Robert K. Wulff, and Geraldine M. Zipser,
individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on behalf of the undersigned the
Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to execute any
appropriate amendment or amendments thereto as may be required by law.

Dated this 16th day of March, 1999.

s/Peter G. Flynn                        s/Cheryl A. LaFleur
_________________________               _________________________
Peter G. Flynn                     Cheryl A. LaFleur


s/Alfred D. Houston                s/Richard P. Sergel
_________________________               _________________________
Alfred D. Houston                       Richard P. Sergel
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA method for the reduction of aerodynamic drag of road vehiclesA method is proposed for the reduction of the aerodynamic drag of bluff bodies, particularly for application to road transport vehicles. This technique consists of installation of panels on the forward surface of the vehicle facing the airstream. With the help of road tests, it was demonstrated that the attachment of proposed panels can reduce aerodynamic drag of road vehicles and result in significant fuel cost savings and conservation of energy resources.Document ID19900018340Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPamadi, Bandu N.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Taylor, Larry W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Leary, Terrance O.*(George Washington Univ. Hampton, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102589NAS 1.15:102589Accession Number90N27656Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-46-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018340.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Pohlman *v.*Fain.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided February 16, 1907.

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Harrell. Decatur superior court. January 6, 1906.

*Donalson & Donalson,*and *Powell & Pottle,*for plaintiff.

*B. B. Bower,*and *Albert E. Bussell,*for defendant.

Cobb, P. J.

This case is controlled by the ruling this day made in *Donalson*v. *Fain,*ante.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Osvaldo Baños, certify that:
1)  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of America Online Latin America, Inc.; 2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4)  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5)  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      Date: March 29, 2005
Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 33-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 4
Nosotros Carlos Mario Bedoya y Luz Dary naranjo, por medio de esta carta 

queremos dar testimonio de que conocemos a Jorge Murillo desde el 2019, lo

conocimos a El y a su Pareja atravez de la iglesia que nos congregamos en el 

condado de Palm Beach (Iglesia christ fellowship, en Royal palm beah).

Nuestro primer encuentro fue en un curso de matrimonio el cual lideramos por 

varios meses, durante su asistencia fue muy disciplinado, participativo y muy 

constructivo en sus comentarios para otras parejas del curso, además tuvimos la 

oportunidad de escuchar su testimonio en un servicio de la iglesia para toda la 

congregacion, relato su vida y como Dios le estaba transformando, este 

testimonio impacto a muchos de los jovenes y fue de gran edificación para todos. 

No solo era un miembro de la iglesia también prestaba servicio en la ubicación del 

parqueo de los vehículos en la iglesia cada domingo.

El tiempo que llevamos de conocernos lo consideramos una persona muy 

humana, muy dado para los demás con una gran vocacion de servicio y 

disposición de ayudar a todo el que necesite, es una persona muy prudente en lo 

que habla, es una persona que inspirar confianza y por esta razón compartimos 

en encuentros en su casa como en la nuestra.

Esperamos que nuestro testimonio pueda servir para que puedan apreciar un 

poco mas quien es Jorge Murillo un hombre que donde va impacta por el gran 

corazón que tiene, esperamos que pronto el pueda volver y continuar ayudando a 

muchas persona como lo venia haciendo.

Gracias por la atención prestada

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 33-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 2 of 4
Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 33-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 3 of 4
Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 33-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 4 of 4
#### Arnold William LEIFER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13464.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1958.

Certiorari Denied Jan. 26, 1959.

See 79 S.Ct. 351.

Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., Victor F. Schmidt, Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.

Sumner Canary, U. S. Atty., James C. Sennett, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before SIMONS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and THORNTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, having waived trial by jury, was convicted for refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States, after being ordered so to do by his local Board, and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

Appellant contends that the denial of his classification as a full conscientious objector, obliging him to do non-combatant military service, was arbitrary, capricious and that he was illegally denied the use of the Federal Bureau of Investigation reports in furtherance of his contention that he had been denied procedural due process of law.

The record reveals substantial evidence that appellant objected to noncombatant military service, for the sole reason that it would interfere with his missionary activities. This, in our judgment, is not sufficient ground for the allowance of a claim to conscientious objection to non-combatant military service. We are in accord with the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Tomlinson v. United States, 216 F.2d 12. In a prosecution for refusing to submit to induction, the defendant is not entitled to the full report made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but only to a fair résumé thereof. Blalock v. United States, 4 Cir., 247 F.2d 615; United States v. Nugent, 346 U.S. 1, 73 S.Ct. 991, 97 L.Ed. 1417.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.622 What are the warning sign requirements?

The construction and use of warning signs must be in compliance with 29 CFR 1910.144 and 1910.145.
Letter from the General Partner to Flintlock Capital Asset Management, LLC



 EXHIBIT 10.5(b) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Flintlock Capital Asset Management LLC 

515 Madison Avenue – 34th Floor 
 New
York, New York 10022 
 Attention: David J. Walker 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Walker: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 FL Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Commodity Advisors Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Spectrum Currency 


 Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290.

 Very truly yours, 
  

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	FLINTLOCK CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC


			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Steve Matthews


			
	Print Name:	 	Steve Matthews
	BC/sr