alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Crim. No. 1970.

First Appellate District, Division One.

July 8, 1937.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES T. CARPENTER for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on Behalf of MRS. PEARL KENNEDY CARPENTER.

George D. Collins, Jr., for Petitioner.

Edward M. Leonard and Raymond D. Williamson for Respondent.

THE COURT.

—A petition for a writ of *habeas corpus*was filed on behalf of Pearl K. Carpenter (who will be hereinafter referred to as the petitioner.) She was committed for contempt by the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco for failing to obey an order directing her to receive into her home and care for her minor children.

The admitted facts are that petitioner was formerly the wife of John Kennedy, and the children are the issue of that marriage. She obtained a divorce from Kennedy and subsequently married Carpenter. She had the custody of the children until her second marriage, whereupon they were taken by Kennedy, who later delivered them to the officers *659of the juvenile court of the above city and county, in whose custody they now remain as wards of the court. Petitioner lives in a house provided by her present husband, where he refuses to permit the children to reside, and it is not contended that she has the means of caring for them elsewhere.

Carpenter is not bound to support the children (Civ. Code, see. 209), and petitioner, not having the ability to do so without his assistance, cannot be imprisoned for her failure to obey an order that she furnish such support. *(In re McCandless,*17 Cal. App. 222 [119 Pac. 199].)

The petitioner is discharged.

A petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 26, 1937.
§ 181.29 Hull identification number display. Two identical hull identification numbers are required to be displayed on each boat hull. ( a ) The primary hull identification number must be affixed— ( 1 ) On boats with transoms, to the starboard outboard side of the transom within two inches of the top of the transom, gunwale, or hull/deck joint, whichever is lowest.
( 2 ) On boats without transoms or on boats on which it would be impractical to use the transom, to the starboard outboard side of the hull, aft, within one foot of the stern and within two inches of the top of the hull side, gunwale or hull/deck joint, whichever is lowest.
( 3 ) On catamarans and pontoon boats which have readily replaceable hulls, to the aft crossbeam within one foot of the starboard hull attachment.
( 4 ) If the hull identification number would not be visible, because of rails, fittings, or other accessories, the number must be affixed as near as possible to the location specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( b ) The duplicate hull identification number must be affixed in an unexposed location on the interior of the boat or beneath a fitting or item of hardware.
( c ) Each hull identification number must be carved, burned, stamped, embossed, molded, bonded, or otherwise permanently affixed to the boat so that alteration, removal, or replacement would be obvious. If the number is on a separate plate, the plate must be fastened in such a manner that its removal would normally cause some scarring of or damage to the surrounding hull area. A hull identification number must not be attached to parts of the boat that are removable.
( d ) The characters of each hull identification number must be no less than one-fourth of an inch high.
[CGD 79-013, 48 FR 40718, Sept. 19, 1983; 48 FR 53558, Nov. 28, 1983]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 98 

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 

on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the 

Joint Committee on Printing and the Joint Committee 

of Congress on the Library. 

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

2 they are hereby, elected members of the following joint 

3 committees of Congress: 

4 JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING: Mrs. Feinstein, 

5 Mr. Inouye, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Bennett, and Mr. 

6 Chambliss. 

7 JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY: 

8 Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Bennett, 

9 and Mr. Stevens. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.12c Construction, maintenance, security, calibration, and training. ( a ) The oil discharge monitoring and control system must be designed to ensure that user access is restricted to essential controls. Access beyond these controls must be available for emergency maintenance and temporary repair but must require the breaking of security seals or activation of another device, which indicates an entry to the equipment.
( b ) The seals must be of a design that only the manufacturer or the manufacturer's agent can replace the seals or reset the system following inspection and permanent repairs to the equipment.
( c ) The accuracy of the monitoring system must be verified during International Oil Pollution Prevention certificate renewal surveys. The calibration certificate certifying date of last calibration check must be retained on board for inspection purposes.
( d ) The monitoring system may have several scales as appropriate for its intended use. The recording device fitted to a meter which has more than one scale must indicate the scale which is in use.
( e ) Simple means must be provided aboard ship to check on instrument drift, repeatability of the instrument reading, and the ability to re-zero the instrument.
( f ) Ship staff training must include familiarization in the operation and the maintenance of the equipment.
( g ) The routine maintenance of the monitoring system and troubleshooting procedures must be clearly defined in the Operating and Maintenance Manual. All routine maintenance and repairs must be recorded.
[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3379, Jan. 16, 2009]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 67 

Designating March 2007 as ‘‘Go Direct Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2007 

Mrs. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2007 as ‘‘Go Direct Month’’. 

Whereas the Department of the Treasury issued 57,000 

checks worth approximately $54,000,000 that were endorsed illegally in 2006; 

Whereas the Department of the Treasury receives approximately 1,500,000 inquiries each year regarding problems 

with paper checks; 

Whereas the use of direct deposit has resulted in more than 

$6,000,000,000 in savings for the Federal Government 

since 1986; 

Whereas more than 12,000,000 social security and other 

Federal benefit recipients have yet to sign up for direct 

deposit; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 67 ATS 

Whereas the United States would generate approximately 

$120,000,000 in annual savings if all Federal beneficiaries used direct deposit; 

Whereas the use of direct deposit is a more secure, reliable, 

and cost effective method of payment than paper checks 

because the use of direct deposit— 

(1) helps protect against identity theft and fraud; 

(2) provides easier access to funds during emergencies and natural disasters; and 

(3) provides citizens of the United States with more 

control over their money; 

Whereas the Department of the Treasury and the Federal 

Reserve Banks have launched ‘‘Go Direct’’, a national 

campaign organized to encourage the people of the 

United States to use direct deposit for the receipt of social security and other Federal benefits; and 

Whereas, by working with financial institutions, advocacy 

groups, and community organizations, the sponsors of 

‘‘Go Direct’’ are educating the people of the United 

States about the advantages of using direct deposit and 

assisting people during the enrollment process: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Go Di3 rect’’; 

4 (2) designates March 2007 as ‘‘Go Direct 

5 Month’’; 

6 (3) commends Federal, State, and local govern7 ments, and the private sector, for promoting March 

8 as ‘‘Go Direct Month’’; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 67 ATS 

1 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to— 

3 (A) participate in events and awareness 

4 initiatives held during the month of March; 

5 (B) become informed about the conven6 ience and safety of direct deposit; and 

7 (C) consider signing up for direct deposit 

8 of social security or other Federal benefits. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### § 175.120 Stowage.

No person may use a boat unless the visual distress signals required by § 175.110 are readily accessible.

[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34715, June 29, 1999]
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350:AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Matthew J. Espe, Chief Executive Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   August 16, 2004

|/s/ MATTHEW J. ESPEMatthew J. Espe                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.614 When is protective clothing required?

The deepwater port operator must ensure that personnel exposed to flying particles, radiant energy, heavy dust, or hazardous materials wear clothing and gloves that protect against the hazard involved.
§ 158.115 Penalties for violation. ( a ) A person who violates MARPOL 73/78, the Act, or the regulations of this part is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $25,000 for each violation, as provided by 33 U.S.C. 1908(b)(1). Each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate violation.
( b ) A person who makes a false, fictitious statement or fraudulent representation in any matter in which a statement or representation is required to be made to the Coast Guard under MARPOL 73/78, the Act, or the regulations of this part, is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each statement or representation, as provided by 33 U.S.C. 1908(b)(2).
( c ) A person who knowingly violates MARPOL 73/78, the Act, or the regulations of this part is liable for a fine for each violation, of not more than $50,000 dollars, or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, as provided by 33 U.S.C. 1908(a).
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18407, Apr. 28, 1989]
§ 146.135 Markings for emergency equipment. ( a ) Markings shall be provided as considered necessary for the guidance of persons on manned facilities.
( b ) The general alarm bell switches shall be identified by red letters at least one inch high with a contrasting background: “General Alarm.”
( c ) All general alarm bells shall be identified by a sign at each bell in red letters at least one inch high with a sharp contrasting background: “General Alarm—When Bell Rings Go to Your Station.
( d ) All life floats, lifeboats, life rafts, and survival capsules, together with paddles or oars, shall be conspicuously marked with a name or number of, or other inscription identifying, the facility on which placed. The number of persons allowed on each life float, lifeboat, or life raft shall be conspicuously marked thereon in letters and numbers 11 ⁄ 2 inches high. These numbers shall be placed on both sides of the life float, lifeboat, or life raft. Inflatable life rafts shall be marked in accordance with Subpart 160.051 of 46 CFR Part 160 and no additional markings are required.
( e ) All life preservers and ring life buoys shall be marked with the name or number of, or other inscription identifying, the facility on which placed except those which accompany mobile crews to unmanned platforms may be marked with the operator's name and field designation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        18,360
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 35,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              71,539
<PP&E>                                        17,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                4,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,202,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         414,149
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      1,495
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,719,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,203,589
<SALES>                                       189,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              189,243
<CGS>                                         117,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 117,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              690,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               619,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  619,512
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.05)




</TABLE>
P. 1



# OAR Box 1103 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 92 ) IV-C-4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-4 1

Printed 4/11/20081:50:51 PM Sheet 92 of 174 IP. 2



### T B . 

### 3 /99 5 Mr . Charle s Simmon s Kilpatric k & Cod

y 70 0 13t hStreet , NW , Suit e 80 0 Washington , D C 2000 5 Dea r Mr . Simmons : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r lette r o f January26 , 1995 , requesting a nextensio no f sixt yday s i nth e commen t perio d o nth e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA ) propose d recommendation s o n Federa l Radiatio nProtectio n Guidanc e fo r Exposur e o f the Genera l Public . W e hav e carefull yconsidere d you r reques t fo r a nextensio no f th e forma l perio d o f commen t o nthes e propose d recommenda-tions , and hav e decide d no t t o gran t you r reques t a t thi s time . W e wil l re-evaluat e thi s decisio n following th e publi c hearing t o b e hel d February22-23 , 1995 , i nWashington , DC . Pleas e b e assured , however , tha t w e wil l mak e everyeffor t t o conside r comment s receive d afte r th e expiratio n o f th e forma l commen t period , and tha t th e proces s o f developing fina l recommendation s wil l extend wel l pas t th e extensio n yo u hav e requested . Sincerely , 

# IS ' Alla nCB . Richardso n Deput yDirecto r fo r Federa l Guidanc e Criteri a & Standard s Divisio n Offic e o f Radiatio n Program s Enclosur e
Advisory Council to Support Grandparents Raising Grandchildren

November 16, 2021 Meeting Summary

On November 16, 2021, the Advisory Council to Support Grandparents Raising Grandchildren 

(SGRG) convened for the fourth time to announce the release of its initial report to Congress. 

The following is a summary of key elements of the meeting.

Call to Order and Welcome Remarks

The meeting was called to order by Alison Barkoff, Principal Deputy Administrator at the 

Administration for Community Living (ACL). Principal Deputy Administrator Barkoff thanked the 

council members for their hard work and commitment over the past two years in completing 

their report to Congress during a pandemic, and at a time when the issue of supporting 

caregivers is front and center across America. 

Presentation of the Councils Initial Report to Congress

The SGRG Council co-chairs gave an overview of the initial report to Congress. Their 

presentation focused on the background of the SGRG Act; the SGRG Council’s guiding 

principles, which informed their development of their report to Congress; the content of the 

report, including the voices of many kin and grandparent caregivers; the analysis and discussion

included in the report; and the twenty-two recommendations for systemic change detailed 

across five priority areas. 

Members then participated in a Q&A session, led by the council co-chairs, during which they 

shared their personal thoughts about the report. Some of the members, many of whom are kin 

or grandparent caregivers themselves, reflected on what it has meant for them to serve on the 

SGRG Council. 

Overview of National Technical Assistance Center on Kinship Families and Grandfamilies

Two speakers from Generations United: Donna Butts, Executive Director, and Ana Beltran, 

Director of the National Technical Assistance Center (NTAC) on Kinship Families and 

Grandfamilies gave an overview of this new 5-year grant project recently funded by ACL

through authority in the American Rescue Plan Act. Many subject matter experts, including Gail 

Engel and Sarah Smalls both of whom serve on the SGRG Council, will also advise the work of 

the NTAC, based on their areas of expertise.

National Family Caregiving Strategy Development

Information about the development of the National Family Caregiving Strategy, relevant to work 

to be done by federal agencies that serve caregivers and children as well as the work that this 

council will focus on in collaboration with the RAISE Family Caregiving Advisory Council. 

Members from both councils will focus on actions that states, tribal entities, community 

organizations, and private sector employers can take to support family caregivers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      20,065,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,460,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    479,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,154,000
<PP&E>                                         994,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,419,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,678,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        7,341,000
<PREFERRED>                                  7,341,000
<COMMON>                                     1,028,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,374,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,419,000
<SALES>                                    101,641,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,641,000
<CGS>                                       81,795,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               81,795,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,170,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (699,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,375,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   841,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,534,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,534,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73


</TABLE>
Order entered March 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01235-CV

DAVID ALAN SHEPHERD, Appellant

V.

LAWRENCE MITCHELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-07702

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s March 4, 2015 motion for extension of time and ORDER the 

brief tendered to the Court on March 4, 2015 filed as of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief is 

due no later than April 9, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE