alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!


				



"# $#%%& 

'&



				




	

	
		(




)%) ! $&

 



*+,+-*.-/0123/43-,356+.7+/3.6638+6+9/53-49+:;4<2+-/

4-/=+93;5/5332,35;1+*;54->+.9=*.?3,/54.6 

)%) ! $&	' $	&&@A B) B
)# #)ACA$)& !	 !A)C D")D(@# $)AC !

C@ &)"A)&E)B$%@""FA)G@)&$$H)C@A$$C) $)A A!)A""CI# J$H)K$CLA# J)")B$AC #B

)G@#EK) $# $H)C@A$ACCK%CA@&)!@A# J)BH!FC%$A#"IH#BH#&&BH)!@")!$CL)J# C 

2MNOPQRSTUQVWRXWXYRPZ[\YWP]^]RL)%CA)$H)
C CAL"))B#"#	"$C J$$H)_#"`#)

)AJ@&C aA#$)!$$)&C@A$HC@&)bccCA$H#K#	') @)HKL)A&c#K#

dde

)%) ! $&A)G@)&$E)AK#&&#C $C@$#"#D)$H)%C""CI# J)")B$AC #B!)'#B)&%CA !!@A# J

$H)$A#"C%$H#&B@&)

3fNgh +UgiZhMNji+kTjl^gNZ

 #)"ACEE&G )""@"AHC )IBHAJ# JBCA!

E$CEIBHAJ# JBCA!mCA$L")

A# $)A

 $#JC@)$C&G )""@"AHC )IBHAJ# JBCA!

E$CEIBHAJ# JBCA!


)# #)ACA$)& )""@"AHC )IBHAJ# JBCA!

	 !A)C D")D(@# $)ACA"C&

CE)D

)""@"AHC )IBHAJ# JBCA!

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
	
	

						
	


			
					

		
	

 !"#"$



%&'()*)%+(&,*-&'.)%&



/			


	
	
	
	
		
	0
1	




	
2


1
34!"#"$

		
	!

%5&(,6+78',599:6:

;	
	
	


<###2		=	>0!

?	<@#
A
	!
$$3<B

C	D E$#F@@@G#$@@

>DHIJ
	C!


>
K4<L3"L

C	DE		FE@LBF$#BG3"4$


D
	M






>D

N+O)&6&:(',99P&-Q:


>
=K4<L3"L





Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.821 Ohio River at Cincinnati, OH; regulated navigation area. ( a ) *Location.* The following is a regulated navigation area (RNA)—The waters of the Ohio River between mile 466.0 and mile 473.0.
( b ) *Activation.* The restrictions in paragraphs (c) ( 1 ) through ( 4 ) are in effect from one-half hour before sunset to one-half hour after sunrise when the Cincinnati, Ohio, Ohio River Gauge is at or above the 45 foot level. The Captain of the Port, Ohio Valley will publish a notice in the Local Notice to Mariners and will make announcements by Coast Guard Marine Information Broadcasts whenever the river level measured at the gauge activates or terminates the navigation restrictions in this section.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Transit through the RNA by all downbound vessels towing cargoes regulated by Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations Subchapters D and O with a tow length exceeding 600 feet excluding the tow boat is prohibited.
( 2 ) No vessel shall loiter, anchor, stop, remain or drift without power at any time within the navigation channel of the RNA.
( 3 ) All commercial vessels shall continually monitor VHF-FM channel 13 on their radiotelephone while in or approaching the RNA.
( 4 ) Between Ohio River miles 464.0 and 466.0, downbound vessels shall make a broadcast in the blind, on VHF-FM channel 13 announcing their estimated time of entering the RNA.
[CGD02-95-003, 61 FR 2417, Jan. 26, 1996. Redesignated by CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33365, June 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35533, June 30, 1998; USCG-2018-0533, 85 FR 8173, Feb. 13, 2020]
Order entered December 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00620-CV

CECILIA BERTAUD, Appellant

V.

WOLNER INDUSTRIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02007-E

ORDER

On November 25, 2015, appellant filed both a pro se brief and a motion for an extension 

of time to retain a lawyer. In a letter dated December 14, 2015, the Court informed appellant her 

brief was deficient and instructed her to file, within ten days, an amended brief correcting the 

deficiencies.

We GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to retain a lawyer. Appellant 

shall notify this Court, by JANUARY 18, 2016, with the name, State Bar number, address, 

phone number, and email address of new counsel. Appellant’s amended brief is now due 

JANUARY 28, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
§ 155.4032 Other resource provider considerations. ( a ) *Use of resource providers not listed in the VRP.* If another resource provider, not listed in the approved plan for the specific service required, is to be contracted for a specific response, justification for the selection of that resource provider needs to be provided to, and approved by, the FOSC. Only under exceptional circumstances will the FOSC authorize deviation from the resource provider listed in the approved vessel response plan in instances where that would best affect a more successful response.
( b ) *Worker health and safety.* Your resource providers must have the capability to implement the necessary engineering, administrative, and personal protective equipment controls to safeguard their workers when providing salvage and marine firefighting services, as found in 33 CFR 155.1055(e) and 29 CFR 1910.120(q).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant.

/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO UNSEAL NOTICE OF

STATUS OF PRIVILEGE REVIEW TEAM’S FILTER PROCESS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Unseal Notice of 

Status of Privilege Review Team’s Filter Process (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 71], filed on September 

8, 2022.1 The Court has reviewed the Motion, which seeks to unseal only the Notice of Status of 

Privilege Review Team’s Filter Process [ECF No. 40]—not the attachments to that Notice 

[ECF Nos. 40-1, 40-2]. The Motion is hereby GRANTED. For purposes of protecting claims of 

attorney-client privilege, however, and in accordance with Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 71 

p. 1 n.2], Exhibits A and B to the Notice [ECF Nos. 40-1, 40-2] shall remain sealed pending further 

Court order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 71] is GRANTED. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to UNSEAL only the Notice of Status of Privilege 

Review Team’s Filter Process [ECF No. 40]. Exhibits A and B [ECF Nos. 40-1, 40-2] 

shall remain sealed until further Court order.

1 Plaintiff has not responded to the Motion, and the deadline to so expired on September 22, 2022.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/03/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 3rd day of October 

2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/03/2022 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.710 What environmental conditions must be satisfied? ( a ) MARAD may issue a license to construct a deepwater port under the Act, with or without conditions, if certain specified conditions are met. The relevant environmental considerations include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Construction and operation of the deepwater port that will be in the national interest and consistent with national security and other national policy goals and objectives, including energy sufficiency, environmental quality, protection from the threat of terrorist attack and other subversive activity against persons and property on the deepwater port and the vessels and crews calling at the deepwater port; and
( 2 ) Under the environmental review criteria in § 148.707 of this subpart, the applicant has demonstrated that the deepwater port will be constructed, operated, and decommissioned using the best available technology to prevent or minimize adverse impacts on the marine environment (33 U.S.C. 1503(c)(3), 1504(f) and 1505(a)(1)).
( b ) Under 33 U.S.C. 1504(f), these criteria in § 148.707 of this part must be considered in the preparation of a single detailed environmental impact statement or environmental assessment for all timely applications covering a single application area. Additionally, 33 U.S.C. 1504(i)(3) specifies that if more than one application is submitted for an “application area,” as defined in 33 U.S.C. 1504(d)(2), the criteria must be used, among other factors, in determining whether any one proposed deepwater port for oil clearly best serves the national interest.
( c ) In accordance with 40 CFR 1502.9, the Commandant (CG-5P) will prepare a supplement to a final environmental impact statement if there is significant new information or circumstances relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the deepwater port and related activities affecting its location site, construction, operation or decommissioning.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
1

Filed 8/22/14 P. v. Soliz CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

HENRY FRANCISCO SOLIZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

C075448

(Super. Ct. No. 12F01442)

This is an appeal pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).

On February 26, 2012, defendant Henry Francisco Soliz argued with the victim 

Dennis Wanstreet about comments the victim had made to defendant’s girlfriend. 

Defendant pulled out a knife and slashed the victim’s face, cutting him through-andthrough, from his ear to his chin, which required over 60 stitches. Defendant told the 

victim that he (defendant) was a “gangster” and threatened to cut the victim’s throat. The 

victim then moved away from defendant, fearing he would be cut again.
2

Defendant entered a no contest plea to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, 

§ 245, subd. (a)(1))1 and making criminal threats (§ 422) and admitted personally 

inflicting great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)) in exchange for dismissal of the 

remaining charge (aggravated mayhem) and enhancement (prior prison term) and a 

stipulated state prison sentence of seven years eight months. The trial court sentenced 

defendant accordingly (upper term of four years for the assault offense, a consecutive 

three-year term for the great bodily injury enhancement, and a consecutive one-third the 

midterm or eight months for criminal threats) and awarded a total of 618 days of 

presentence custody credit.2

Defendant appeals. He did not request a certificate of probable cause. (§ 1237.5.)

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and 

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 

436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 

30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we 

received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the 

entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable 

to defendant.

 

1

 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 The trial court originally awarded a total of 614 days of presentence custody credit but, 

upon defense appellate counsel’s request, modified the number of actual days and the 

total credit to 618 days and issued an amended abstract of judgment accordingly.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

 BLEASE , J.

We concur:

 RAYE , P. J.

 MAURO , J.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Ilan Kenig,certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Unity Wireless Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 26, 2004

/s/ Ilan Kenig

Ilan Kenig
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32(b)


                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama
Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we, the undersigned,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual
knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for the
          quarter ended September 30, 2004, which this statement accompanies,
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
          Alabama Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Alabama Power Company.



                              /s/Charles D. McCrary
                               Charles D. McCrary
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                          /s/William B. Hutchins, III
                            William B. Hutchins, III
                            Executive Vice President,
                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  November 5, 2004
# ToC

A-Abuse, Gross Neglect, Exploitation

B-Access to Information by Resident or Resident's Representative

C-Admission, Transfer, Discharge, Eviction

D-Autonomy, Choice, Preference, Exercise of Rights, Privacy

E-Financial, Property (Except Financial Exploitation)

B-2 Nursing Facilities Complaint Table by State (full table)

F-Care

G-Rehabilitation or Maintenance of Function

H-Restraints - Chemical and Physical

I-Activities and Social Services

J-Dietary

K-Environment

L-Policies, Procedures, Attitudes, Resources

M-Staffing

N-Certification/Licensing Agency

O-State Medicaid Agency

P-System/Others

B-2 Nursing Facilities Complaint Table  by Region (full table)

# B-2 NF-Comp full by State

Table of Contents

# B-2 NF-Comp full by Region

Table of Contents

# A Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation

Table of Contents

# B Access to Information

Table of Contents

# C Admission, Transfer, Disch

Table of Contents

# D Choice, Privacy

Table of Contents

# E Financial, Property

Table of Contents

# F Care

Table of Contents

# G Rehab or Maint of Function

Table of Contents

# H Restraints

Table of Contents

# I Activities & Social Services

Table of Contents

# J Dietary

Table of Contents

# K Environment

Table of Contents

# L Policies, Procedures

Table of Contents

# M Staffing

Table of Contents

# N Certification Agency

Table of Contents

# O State Medicaid Agency

Table of Contents

# P System, Others

Table of Contents
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer** 
**Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**
In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kamal Abdallah, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

August 19, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

/S/    KAMAL ABDALLAH

 

 

 

 

 

 

**Kamal Abdallah**      
**President, Chief Executive Officer and Director**
#### § 780.707 Establishments “commonly recognized” as country elevators.

In determining whether a particular establishment is one that is “commonly recognized” as a country elevator—and this must be true of the particular establishment if the exemption is to apply—it should be kept in mind that the intent of section 13(b)(14) is to “exempt country elevators that market farm products, mostly grain, for farmers” (107 Cong. Rec. (daily ed.) p. 5883). It is also appropriate to consider the characteristics and functions which the courts and government agencies have recognized as those of “country elevators” and the distinctions which have been recognized between country elevators and other types of establishments. For example, in proceedings to determine industries of a seasonal nature under part 526 of the regulations in this chapter, “country” grain elevators, public terminal and subterminal grain elevators, wheat flour mill elevators, non-elevator-type bulk grain storing establishments, and “flat warehouses” in which grain is stored in sacks, have been recognized as distinct types of establishments engaged in grain storage. (See 24 FR 2584; 3581.) As the legislative history of the exemption cited above makes clear, country elevators handle “mostly grain.” The courts have recognized that the terms “country elevator” and “country grain elevator” are interchangeable (the term “country house” has also been recognized as synonymous), and that there are significant differences between country elevators and other types of establishments engaged in grain storage (see *Tobin* v. *Flour Mils,* 185 F. 2d 596; *Mitchell* v. *Sampson Const. Co.* (D. Kan.) 14 WH Cases 269).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Member Conflict Review, 
Program Announcement (PA) 07-318, initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-3 p.m., November 9, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH), CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, 
Telephone: (304) 285-6143.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Member Conflict Review, PA 07-318.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Bernadine Kuchinski, PhD, 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, NIOSH, 
CDC, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-7, 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, Telephone: (513) 533-8511.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: August 12, 2011.
Elizabeth Millington,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-21420 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAUL SARABIA, JR,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00064-CR

Appeal from the

207th Judicial District Court

of Comal County, Texas

(TC# CR2018-305)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

trial court’s judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below and grant counsel’s 

motion to withdraw. We further order that Appellee recover from Appellant and his sureties, if 

any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all costs, for which let execution issue. This 

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022.

SANDEE B. MARION, Chief Justice (Ret.)

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Alley, and Marion, C.J.(Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)