alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  FinancialContent,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A  for the fiscal  year ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  the Chief  Executive  Officer and  Controller of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Wing Yu                                 /s/ Dave Neville
---------------------------                 -------------------------------
    Wing Yu                                     Dave Neville
    Chief Executive Officer,                    Chief Financial Officer
    March 23, 2006                               March 23, 2006

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT AUGUST 31, 1996 AND FEBRUARY
29, 1996 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE SIX MONTH
AND THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000001761
<NAME> Tranzonic Companies
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                      11,868,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,194,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,539,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,336,234
<PP&E>                                      18,544,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,626,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,400,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       998,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,348,431<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,626,460
<SALES>                                     70,161,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            70,161,762
<CGS>                                       46,422,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               64,835,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,471
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,472,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,925,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,547,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,547,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS FIGURE INCLUDES $5,780,774 IN ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL AND
$49,567,657 IN RETAINED EARNINGS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 110.127b Flaming Gorge Lake, Wyoming-Utah.

(a) *Buckboard Crossing, Wyo.* That portion of Flaming Gorge Lake inclosed by the shore and a line connecting the following points, excluding a 150-foot-wide fairway, extending southeasterly from the launching ramp, as established by the Superintendent, Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| “a” 41°14′50′′ N. | 109°35′22′′ W. |
| “b” 41°14′37′′ N. | 109°35′12′′ W. |

(b) *Squaw Hollow, Wyo.* That portion of Flaming Gorge Lake inclosed by the shore and a line connecting the following points, excluding a 100-foot-wide fairway, extending southeasterly from the launching ramp, as established by the Superintendent, Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| “a” 41°09′55′′ N. | 109°33′18′′ W. |
| “b” 41°09′48′′ N. | 109°33′20′′ W. |

(c) *Antelope Flat, Utah.* That portion of Flaming Gorge Lake inclosed by the shore and a line connecting the following points, excluding a 150-foot-wide fairway, extending southeasterly from the launching ramp to a point beyond the floating breakwater and then westerly, as established by the Superintendent, Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| “a” 40°57′46′′ N. | 109°33′30′′ W. |
| “b” 40°57′37′′ N. | 109°33′37′′ W. |

(d) *Lucerne Valley, Utah.* That portion of Flaming Gorge Lake inclosed by the shore and a line connecting the following points, excluding a 300-foot-wide fairway extending southeasterly from the launching ramp, as established by the Superintendent, Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| “a” 40°59′07′′ N. | 109°34′54′′ W. |
| “b” 40°58′54′′ N. | 109°35′00′′ W. |

Note:

Fixed moorings, piles, or stakes are prohibited. Single and fore-and-aft temporary moorings will be allowed. The anchoring of vessels and the placing of temporary moorings will be under the jurisdiction and at the discretion of the Superintendent, Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area.
§ 127.207 Warning alarms. ( a ) The marine transfer area for LNG must have a rotating or flashing amber light with a minimum effective flash intensity, in the horizontal plane, of 5000 candelas. At least 50% of the required effective flash intensity must be maintained in all directions from 1.0 degree above to 1.0 degree below the horizontal plane.
( b ) The marine transfer area for LNG must have a siren with a minimum 1 ⁄ 3-octave band sound pressure level at l meter of 125 decibels referenced to 0.0002 microbars. The siren must be located so that the sound signal produced is audible over 360 degrees in a horizontal plane.
( c ) Each light and siren must be located so that the warning alarm is not obstructed for a distance of 1.6 km (1 mile) in all directions.
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7107

CARLOS MAYBERRY, a/k/a Bel Sable Napolean,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. PHILIP MORGAN, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:11-cv-02215-WDQ)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos R. Mayberry, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Mayberry appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Mayberry v. Morgan, No. 1:11-cv-02215-WDQ (D. Md. June 

15, 2012). Mayberry’s motion for appointment of counsel is 

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 11, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D 16-2855 & 3D17-605

Lower Tribunal No. 15-7111

________________



### Reynaldo Acosta and Iliana B. Acosta

,

Appellants,

vs.



### Tower Hill Signature Insurance Company

,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Samantha RuizCohen

, Judge.

The Monfiston Firm P.A., and Daniel Monfiston

, for appellants.

Link & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Berard Rockenbach, (West Palm

Beach); Gaebe Mullen Antonelli DiMatteo, and Devang Desai, and Elaine D.

Walter

, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LINDSEY, JJ.

LINDSEY, J.We find no error with regard to the issues raised on appeal relating to the

final judgment entered in favor of Tower Hill Signature Insurance Company and,

therefore, affirm. Because the order granting Tower Hill Signature Insurance

Company’s entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs from Reynaldo Acosta and

Iliana B. Acosta did not establish an amount, it was a non-final, non-appealable

order that is not ripe for our review. As such, we are without jurisdiction to

address the portion of the appeal relating to attorney’s fees. See Diaz v. Citizens

Prop. Ins. Corp.

, 227 So. 3d 735, 736-37 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“[W]e are without

jurisdiction to address the portion of the appeal relating to attorney’s fees

. . . .

because no amount has been fixed by the trial court and the part of the final

judgment that finds entitlement thereto is not ripe for our review.” (first citing

Kling Corp. v. Hola Networks Corp.

, 127 So. 3d 833, 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013));

then citing Mills v. Martinez

, 909 So. 2d 340, 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); and then

citing Chaiken v. Suchman

, 694 So. 2d 115, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)). “Nor is

such an order one of the enumerated appealable non-final orders set forth in

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.” Id. at 737 (quoting Kling Corp.

, 127

So. 3d at 833); see Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3). Accordingly, the appeal with

respect to attorney’s fees is dismissed without prejudice.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Reclamation Consulting
and Applications, Inc. (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Gordon W. Davies, President of the Company,
and Michael C. Davies, Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of  the Company.

/s/ Gordon W. Davies
------------------------------------
Gordon W. Davies
President
Dated: October 01, 2004



/s/ Michael C. Davies
------------------------------------
Michael C. Davies
Secretary

Dated:  October 01, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00325-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.S. AND S.S., Children

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-08-56366-CV

Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal by M.S. is DISMISSED for 

want of prosecution. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant M.S.

SIGNED October 17, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Negotiation Assistance ADR

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Negotiation Assistance ADR Negotiation Assistance ADRADR2022-02-17T18:40:59-05:00
			
			Negotiation Assistance ADRNegotiation assistance may be appropriate in situations where both parties are willing to negotiate and there is some likelihood of reaching a negotiated settlement.  Negotiation assistance is the most interactive type of ADR at GAO, as parties will take an active role in discussing settlement possibilities.  In negotiation assistance ADR, the GAO attorney handling the case will act as a facilitator to assist the parties in arriving at a mutually agreeable settlement.  Any settlement reached will be voluntary and GAO will not “sign off” or otherwise review any settlement. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
See below for **excerpts** from Iowa Administrative Code Department on Aging [17] pertaining to Voluntary Contributions for Older Americans Act Services.

Full document located at https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/iac/agency/17.pdf

**17—5.8(231) Contributions.** Each area agency on aging shall be allowed to receive voluntary contributions in compliance with federal and state laws, rules, and regulations.

**17—6.14(231) Requirements for service providers.**

6.14(1) Contributions. The AAA shall consult with the relevant service providers and older individuals in the PSA to determine the best method for accepting voluntary contributions. As established by contract with the AAA, each service provider, including an AAA providing direct service, shall: 

a. Provide each older individual with a voluntary opportunity to contribute to the cost of the service by displaying a suggested contribution schedule that takes into consideration income ranges of eligible individuals in local communities; 

b. Clearly inform each recipient that there is no obligation to contribute and that the contribution is purely voluntary; 

c. Protect the privacy and confidentiality of each older individual with respect to the person’s contributions; 

d. Utilize appropriate procedures to safeguard and account for all contributions against loss, mishandling or theft by obtaining bonding for all employees and volunteers; 

e. Use all contributions to expand the service for which such contribution is given. Nutrition service providers shall use all contributions to increase the number of meals served. 

6.14(2) Failure to contribute. A provider that receives department funds may not deny any older individual a service because the person will not or cannot contribute to the cost. 

6.14(3) Obtain views of older individuals. Each provider shall utilize procedures determined by the AAA for obtaining the views of participants about the services they receive. A report of procedures utilized and findings shall be issued by the AAA within six months of the signing of the contract. 

6.14(4) Seek other sources of funding. Prior to requesting Title III funding, service providers shall demonstrate efforts to seek funds from other federal, state, and local sources. 

6.14(5) Compliance by service providers. The AAA shall incorporate in its contract with each service provider an assurance that funds are used in compliance with federal guidelines. 

7.12(5) Food assistance program. The AAA and nutrition services providers shall assist participants in taking advantage of benefits available to them under the food assistance program by providing current information to participants in both the congregate and home-delivered meals programs. Nutrition services providers shall be certified to accept food assistance as contributions for meals.
<PAGE>

                         [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP]

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

The Stockholder
To the Board of Directors of Litton Loan Servicing LP:

We have examined managements assertion about Litton Loan Servicing LPs
(the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination of the Companys
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
---------------------------------
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
February 28, 2000
**Exhibit 32.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of AmericaOnline Latin America, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), we, Charles Herington, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Osvaldo Baños, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act or 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ CHARLES M. HERINGTONCharles M. HeringtonChief Executive Officer
/s/ OSVALDO BAÑOSOsvaldo BañosChief Financial Officer
Date: March 30, 2004
**Exhibit 31(c)2**

**GEORGIA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Cliff S. Thrasher, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2007

/s/Cliff S. Thrasher

Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Innofone.com, Incorporated (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Alex
Lightman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Peter Maddocks, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

         (1)   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2)   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Registrant.






Date: October 14, 2005                By:  /s/ Alex Lightman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alex Lightman
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President





Date: October 14, 2005                By:  /s/ Peter Maddocks
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Peter Maddocks
                                           Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                      *****




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------