alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10-a

                              AMENDMENT NUMBER 1
                                     TO THE
                             AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
                          SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
                   Amended and Restated as of January 1, 1995
                                  (the "Plan")

         AmSouth Bancorporation hereby amends the Plan, effective as indicated
below, as follows:

1.       Effective January 1, 2001, by adding the following paragraph before
         Article I:

         Effective January 1, 2001, the First American Corporation Supplemental
Executive Retirement Program (the "FAC Program") was merged into the Plan, with
the Plan serving as the surviving plan.

2.       Effective January 1, 2001, by adding a new section 3.04 as follows:

         Section 3.04. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, all
         -------------
benefits accrued to Participants in the FAC Program through December 31, 2000,
shall be calculated using the FAC Program terms and conditions as in effect
December 31, 2000 and such benefits shall be subject to such terms and
conditions, including but not limited to the terms and conditions governing the
distribution of such benefits. Effective December 31, 2000 benefit accruals
under the terms of the FAC Program shall cease. The FAC Program benefits shall
not be less than the accrued benefits under the terms of the FAC Program
immediately preceding the merger of the FAC Program into the Plan. A copy of the
FAC Program as of December 31, 2000 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Effective
January 1, 2001, all benefits will be calculated under the terms and conditions
of the Plan from January 1, 2001 forward.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AmSouth Bancorporation has caused this Amendment Number 1 to
be executed by its duly authorized officers effective as of January 1, 2001.

                                       AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION

ATTEST:

                                       By: /s/ C. Dowd Ritter
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           C. Dowd Ritter
/s/ Carl L. Gorday                         President and Chief Executive Officer
---------------------------------
Assistant Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-36,960 et al.]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at CNG Transmission Corp., Clarksburg, West Virginia, Hope Gas, Inc., Clarksburg, West Virginia, East Ohio Gas, Cleveland, Ohio, Virginia Natural Gas, Norfolk, Virginia, CNG Producing Co., New Orleans, Louisiana, Peoples Natural Gas Co., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, CNG Cooperate, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-36,960; CNG Transmission Corp., Clarksburg, West Virginia

TA-W-36,960A; Hope Gas, Inc., Clarksburg, West Virginia

TA-W-36,960B; East Ohio Gas, Cleveland, Ohio

TA-W-36,960C; Virginia Natural Gas, Norfolk, Virginia

TA-W-36,960D; CNG Producing Co., New Orleans, Louisiana

TA-W-36,960E; Peoples Natural Gas Co., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

TA-W-36,960F; CNG Corporate, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (May 18, 2000)

Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of May, 2000.

Grant D. Beale, 

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-13475  Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.154 Assistant personnel. The owner, operator, and master of a tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10a(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) shall ensure that each member of the crew that has a designated responsibility during COW operations— ( a ) Has six months or more of tank vessel duty that includes oil cargo discharge operations;
( b ) Has been instructed in the COW operation of the tank vessel; and
( c ) Is familiar with the contents of the *Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual* approved by the Coast Guard under § 157.112 or by the government of the vessel's flag state.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43709, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11628, Mar. 22, 1985]
# 11 th 

# Conference on Air Quality Modeling

EPA RTP, NC Campus – August 12 - 13, 2015 

# Public Hearing Public Presentations

# 11 th 

# Conference on Air Quality Modeling • Thursday Public Presentation Session Logistics

– The Conference is a Public Hearing for a proposed rulemaking. • All presentations are officially part of the record and will be submitted to the proposed rulemaking Docket (ID No. EPA- HQ- OAR -2015 - 0310). • Everyone speaking today must identify themselves and their affiliation. • All dialog is being transcribed and will also be submitted to the Docket. • There will not be any Q&A during or following any presentation. • Anyone not requesting a reserved spot to present will have an opportunity later today to provide oral comments. • Comments can be submitted to the Docket through October 27, 2015.



## – Thursday morning’s s chedule is brisk! • There are 1 0 requested public presentations this afternoon. • All presentation spots are 15 minutes in length. • Speakers, please be respectful of the set time schedule. 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 08/13/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0378 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEITH CHARLES BAYLOR,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 4 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2021

04/29/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0378
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 114

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
       should be issued to honor our Nation's disabled veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2009

Mr. Buchanan (for himself, Mr. Cao, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Lee of New York, 
   Mr. McKeon, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Rooney, Ms. Kilpatrick of 
   Michigan, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Castle, Mr. Dent, Mr. 
Altmire, Mrs. Bachmann, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Latta, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Brown 
    of South Carolina, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. 
 Reichert, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Mack, Mr. Wamp, 
 Mr. Schrader, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Hall 
of New York, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Upton, and Mr. Abercrombie) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
       should be issued to honor our Nation's disabled veterans.

Whereas more than 3,000,000 of the Nation's veterans are currently classified as 
        disabled;
Whereas disabled veterans risked their lives and sacrificed their health in 
        dedicated service to our country;
Whereas disabled veterans are returning home each day from honorably defending 
        our country; and
Whereas it is only fitting that our disabled veterans be honored for their 
        selfless service and sacrifices: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service to honor our Nation's disabled 
        veterans; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
Fort Berthold Federal Implementation PlanAQIA Calories per Second Calculations with Data from Synthetic Minor Permit ApplicationsJuly 2012**Company / Operator** **Heater-Treater Gas - utility flare (btu/scf)** **Tank Gas - enclosed combustor (btu/scf)** **calories per btu** **Heater Treater gas** **Mean (scf/day)** **Tank Gas Mean** **(scf/day) seconds** **per day Heater** **Treater Gas - utility Flare** **(cal per second)** **Tank Gas - combustor** **(cal per second)** Enerplus 1,473.0 1,418.0 252.2 189,880.0 20,444.0 86,400.0 816,304.1 84,608.1XTO1,401.02,000.0252.2189,880.020,444.086,400.0776,403.3119,334.5WPX1,606.02,402.0252.2189,880.020,444.086,400.0890,009.8143,320.7EOG1,444.02,352.0252.2189,880.020,444.086,400.0800,233.0140,337.3Marathon1,612.02,231.0252.2189,880.020,444.086,400.0893,334.9133,117.6Petrohunt1,085.02,045.0252.2189,880.020,444.086,400.0601,283.1122,019.5**Mean Value 1,436.8** **2,074.7 252.2** **189,880.0 20,444.0** **86,400.0 796,261.4** **123,789.6**Cal / second = (btu/scf) * (cal / btu) * (scf / day) / (86400 sec / day)Btu / scf values gathered from one application for 6 operatorsFlare Gas Volumes Mean taken from AQIA spreadsheet analysis of 64 operator syn minor applications
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6397** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MOISE W. TOHOTCHEU , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00305

- CMH

- 3; 1:09

- cv - 01180

- CMH )

Submitted : November 19, 2010 Decided: December 14, 2010

Before GREGORY and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Moise W. Tohotcheu, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Lieselotte Krebs

Pilotti, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding preced ent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Moise W. Tohotcheu seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedura l ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Tohotcheu has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

an d legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CRUZ VALDIVIESO FIGUERA, CASE NO: 0:22-CV-61553-WPD

Plaintiff, 

v.

ALL VIP CARE, INC., & LIZ

VELAZQUEZ McKINNON,

Defendants. 

__________________________________________/

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW FILING NUMBER DE-56

The Defendants, ALL VIP CARE, INC. (“VIP”) and LIZ VELAZQUEZ McKINNON, 

(“McKinnon”) (collectively, “Defendants”), file this Motion to Withdraw Filing Number DE-56, 

and in support thereof states:

1. This filing [DE-56] was made on July 14, 2023, intending to represent the filing as 

the Defendants’ Statement of Material Facts with the Exhibits in support thereof as an attachment.

2. The filing [DE-56] by the undersigned counsel (for the Defendants), erroneously

titled the filing as the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment.

3. The Motion for Summary Judgment was then filed as [DE-57.]

4. The Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Material Facts along with the Exhibits 

was then filed as [DE-58.]

5. As such, filing [DE-56], which was erroneously labelled is moot as the corrected 

filings were made in [DE-57 and DE-58.]

6. As ordered by the Court [DE-55] the undersigned reviewed Local Rule 56.1, prior 

to the above filings.

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE the Defendants respectfully request that [DE-56] be withdrawn and be 

deemed moot, as the correct filings were made under [DE-57 and DE-58.]

Respectfully submitted:

/s/ RANDY M. GOLDBERG, ESQUIRE

Florida Healthcare Law Firm

151 NW 1st Avenue

Delray Beach, FL 33444

754-224-0867

FBN: 045187

randy@floridahealthcarelawfirm.com

randymgoldberg@gmail.com

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of this pleading which was filed with the Clerk of the Court 

was provided to Brian Pollock, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff, at 135 San Lorenzo Ave., Ste. 770, 

Coral Gables, FL 33146, brian@fairlawgroup.com via the Court’s ECM/ECF Portal on July 14, 

2023

/s/ RANDY M. GOLDBERG, ESQUIRE

Florida Healthcare Law Firm

151 NW 1st Avenue

Delray Beach, FL 33444

754-224-0867

FBN: 045187

randy@floridahealthcarelawfirm.com

randymgoldberg@gmail.com

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 698 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 698

     Designating October 17, 2008, as ``National Mammography Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

  Mr. Reid (for Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Casey, Mrs. 
 Dole, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Johnson, 
Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Bayh)) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating October 17, 2008, as ``National Mammography Day''.

Whereas, according to the American Cancer Society, in 2008, 182,460 women will 
        be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and 40,480 women will die from 
        that disease;
Whereas it is estimated that about 2,000,000 women were diagnosed with breast 
        cancer in the 1990s, and that in nearly 500,000 of those cases the 
        cancer resulted in death;
Whereas approximately 3,000,000 women in the United States are living with 
        breast cancer, about 2,300,000 have been diagnosed with the disease, and 
        an estimated 1,000,000 do not yet know they have the disease;
Whereas African-American women suffer a 36 percent greater mortality rate from 
        breast cancer than White women and more than a 100 percent greater 
        mortality rate from breast cancer than women from Hispanic, Asian, and 
        American Indian populations;
Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a woman at age 70 
        having twice as much of a chance of developing the disease as a woman at 
        age 50;
Whereas at least 90 percent of the women who get breast cancer have no family 
        history of the disease;
Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a certified facility, can 
        provide safe screening and early detection of breast cancer in many 
        women;
Whereas mammography is an excellent method for early detection of localized 
        breast cancer, which has a 5-year survival rate of 98 percent;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society continue 
        to recommend periodic mammograms; and
Whereas the National Breast Cancer Coalition recommends that each woman and her 
        health care provider make an individual decision about mammography: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 17, 2008, as ``National Mammography 
        Day''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
ABEL ACOSTA,CLERK

SUPREME CRT.BLDING.

201 W."l4TH ST.RM.106

P.O.BOX 12308

AUSTIN,TX 78711-2308

^S C/18--0I

MARCH 16,2015

RE:FOR COPY'OF MY LAST 1107 SUBMITTED

ON 10-1-12.(COVER ONLY).

WRIT NO.:WR-78,478-01

DEAR MR.ACOSTA,

I,JUAN MUNOZ,TDCJ NO.1467005,AM HOUSED HERE IN THE DOLPH BRISCOE UNIT IN

DILLEY,TX.I AM REQUESTING OF YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS IMPORTANT MATTER.ALL I AM

REQUESTING IS FOR A COPY OF THE COVER OF MY 1107 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,REASON

BEING IS THAT I NEED TO SEE WHAT BOX WAS MARKED OF WHETHER CHALLENGING THE CONVI

CTION OR SENTENCING.

I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND TAKING THE

TIME IN YOUR ALREADY BUSY DAY TO ASSIST ME IN THIS VERY IMPORTANT MATTER.MAY GOD

BLESS YOU ABUNDANTLY...

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

PROSE/SOJAN MUNO;

^ej—Ne-ri467oo5 DOLPH BRISCOE UNIT

1459 W.HWY.85

DILLEY,TX 78017

FRIO COUNTY

mw

IV$

M)aABW».cl*k
-cr-06236-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06236-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06236-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
-cr-06236-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2000 P
EXHIBIT 8.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




1.   ALB Holdings Ltd.

The Company holds a 100% interest in ALB Holdings Ltd., a British Columbia
Corporation.

2.   Mina Real Mexico S.A. de C.V.

The Company directly owns a 51% interest in Mina Real Mexico S.A. de C.V., which
was incorporated in Mexico in January 2006. Through its 100% interest in ALB
Holdings Ltd., the Company indirectly holds the remaining 49% interest in Mina
Real Mexico S.A. de C.V.

3.   Minera Nayarit S.A. de C.V.

The Company holds a 60% interest in Minera Nayarit S.A. de C.V., which was
incorporated April 29, 2004 in Mexico. Minera Nayarit S.A. de C.V. is dormant.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.445 Franklin Canal.

The draw of the Chatsworth Bridge, mile 4.8 at Franklin, shall open on signal from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. if at least one hour notice is given. From October 1 through January 31 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw shall be opened on signal if at least three hours notice is given. From February 1 through September 30 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.

[USCG-2009-0670; 74 FR 66238, Dec. 15, 2009]
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    GEORGE JOSEPH                  
|                    |  |  |  | George Joseph, Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certifications are being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.435 Vital systems surveys. ( a ) A tank vessel owner or operator shall ensure that surveys of the following systems are conducted: ( 1 ) *Cargo systems.* The survey must include the examination and testing of the items listed in chapters 6, 7, and 10 of the International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals, if applicable, prior to cargo transfer operations.
( 2 ) *Mooring systems.* The survey must include a visual examination of the emergency towline, the anchor releasing mechanism, and mooring lines prior to entering the port or place of destination, if weather permits, or prior to getting underway.
( b ) Surveys must be conducted by company management personnel, company designated individuals, or vessel officers knowledgeable about the equipment operating parameters and having the authority, capability, and responsibility to initiate corrective action when the equipment is not functioning properly.
( c ) The results of the survey required in paragraph (a) of this section, including the material condition of each system, must be recorded in the tank vessel's deck log or other onboard documentation.
[CGD 91-045, 61 FR 39789, July 30, 1996; 61 FR 41685, Aug. 9, 1996]