alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.530 Safety Zone: Cape Fear and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, NC. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a moving safety zone during the specified conditions: The waters of the Cape Fear and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers for 500 yards ahead and astern, and 75 yards abeam of a vessel carrying hazardous materials when designated by the Captain of the Port, North Carolina.
( b ) *General Information.* ( 1 ) The Captain of the Port and the Command Duty Officer at Sector North Carolina can be contacted at telephone number (877) 229-0770 or (910) 772-2200. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander enforcing the safety zone can be contacted on VHF-FM channels 16 and 81.
( 2 ) The Captain of the Port may authorize and designate any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer to act on his behalf in enforcing this safety zone.
( 3 ) Sector North Carolina will notify the maritime community of periods during which this safety zone will be in effect by providing advance notice of scheduled arrivals and departures of loaded hazardous materials vessels via a marine Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
( c ) *Regulation.* The general regulations governing safety zones contained in § 165.23 apply.
[COTP Wilmington, NC 94-004, 59 FR 42759, Aug. 19, 1994, as amended by USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40059, June 29, 2000; USCG-2011-0368, 76 FR 26605, May 9, 2011]
#### § 167.1311 In the Strait of Juan de Fuca: Western lanes.

In the western lanes of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the following are established:

(a) A separation zone bounded by a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| *Latitude* | *Longitude* |
| --- | --- |
| 48°29.11′ N | 125°00.00′ W |
| 48°29.11′ N | 124°43.78′ W |
| 48°13.89′ N | 123°54.84′ W |
| 48°13.89′ N | 123°31.98′ W |
| 48°14.49′ N | 123°31.98′ W |
| 48°17.02′ N | 123°56.46′ W |
| 48°30.10′ N | 124°43.50′ W |
| 48°30.10′ N | 125°00.00′ W |

(b) A traffic lane for north-westbound traffic.

(1) The traffic lane is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| *Latitude* | *Longitude* |
| --- | --- |
| 48°16.45′ N | 123°30.42′ W |
| 48°15.97′ N | 123°33.54′ W |
| 48°18.00′ N | 123°56.07′ W |
| 48°32.00′ N | 124°46.57′ W |
| 48°32.09′ N | 124°49.90′ W |
| 48°32.09′ N | 125°00.00′ W |

(2) An exit from this lane between points 48°32.00′ N, 124°46.57′ W and 48°32.09′ N, 124°49.90′ W. Vessel traffic may exit this lane at this location or may remain in the lane between points 48°32.09′ N, 124°49.90′ W and 48°32.09′ N, 125°00.00′ W en route to precautionary area “JF,” as described in § 167.1315.

(c) A traffic lane for south-eastbound traffic between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| *Latitude* | *Longitude* |
| --- | --- |
| 48°28.13′ N | 124°57.90′ W |
| 48°28.13′ N | 124°44.07′ W |
| 48°12.90′ N | 123°55.24′ W |
| 48°12.94′ N | 123°32.89′ W |

[USCG-2002-12702, 75 FR 70827, Nov. 19, 2010]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

January 23, 2024

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810 

Appeal Number: 23-13046-CC 

Case Style: Delio Batista, et al v. Avant Assurance, Inc., et al

District Court Docket No: 1:22-cv-22671-CMA

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Order of Dismissal for failure to prosecute in the above 

referenced appeal is issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 41-4. 

Any pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order. 

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers 

General Information: 404-335-6100 Attorney Admissions: 404-335-6122 

Case Administration: 404-335-6135 Capital Cases: 404-335-6200 

CM/ECF Help Desk: 404-335-6125 Cases Set for Oral Argument: 404-335-6141 

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-2 Letter and Entry of Dismissal

 

USCA11 Case: 23-13046 Document: 23 Date Filed: 01/23/2024 Page: 1 of 2 

AP Jan 23, 2024 MIAMI

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 148 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2024 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 23-13046-CC

______________ 

DELIO BATISTA, 

CARLOS LOPEZ, 

MARIANA LOPEZ, 

RAFAELA VALIENTE, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees - Cross Appellants,

versus

AVANT ASSURANCE, INC., 

 Defendant - Appellant - Cross Appellee,

REINIER CORTES 

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO

 Defendants - Appellees.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), the cross appeal only is DISMISSED for want of 

prosecution because the appellant Delio Batista, Carlos Lopez, Mariana Lopez and Rafaela 

Valiente failed to file a Civil Appeal Statement form within the time fixed by the rules. 

Effective January 23, 2024. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 23-13046 Document: 23 Date Filed: 01/23/2024 Page: 2 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 148 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2024 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 165

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

#### § 165.166 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68104, Aug. 23, 2024.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Validian Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.  Date:  April 14, 2008  By:  /s/ Ronald Benn Ronald Benn Chief Financial Officer
(79 South. 197)

#### CEPHUS v. STATE.

(4 Div. 559.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 29, 1918.)

1. Embezzlement <&wkey;14 — By_Agent.

Fraudulent conversion of money paid to an agent for a particular purpose constitutes embezzlement under the statute.

[Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Embezzlement.]

2. Embezzlement <&wkey;23 — Defense—Promise to Repay Money.

It is no defense to a charge of embezzlement by an agent that after the offense was completed defendant promised to repay the money converted.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Barbour County; J. S. Williams, Judge.

Ada Cephus was convicted of embezzlement, and appeals.

Affirmed.

Guy W. Winn, of Clayton, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for -the State.

SAMFORD, J.

[1] There was evidence on the part of the state which, if believed, tended to show that the defendant was the agent of one Bruna McLeod for a particular purpose; that there was paid to the defendant by virtue of this agency the sum of $15; that the defendant did not use the money for the purpose contemplated, but fraudulently' converted it to her- own use. The foregoing constitutes embezzlement under our statutes. Pullam v. State, 78 Ala. 31, 56 Am. Rep. 21. It was shown that the transaction was in Barbour county. There being evidence to sustain the material ingredients of the offense as charged, the court did not err in refusing to give at the request of the defendant, the affirmative charge.

12] The fact that after the agency agreement, turning over the money under the agency, and the failure of the agent to use the money as directed, the agent promised to repay the $15 to the principal would not entitle the ' defendant to the affirmative charge. The crime had been completed, was against the state, and no individual would have the right to waive the prosecution.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
|Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation (the "Registrants") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies with respect to each registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated as of May 7, 2004
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By /s/ Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.                  | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                | 
|Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer | 



|By /s/ G. C. Ketcham                  | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|                                      | 
|G. C. Ketcham
Chief Financial Officer | 



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and will be retained by Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32(f)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southern Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Ronnie L. Bates

Ronnie L. Bates

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Michael W. Southern

Michael W. Southern

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

     |

 

 

Date:  August 3, 2006
#### ANNA K. GILMAN, Executrix, etc., Appellant, *v.*WINTHROP W. GILMAN and others, Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, directing payment of the sum of $4,000 to Charles H. Glover, $6,000 on account of a balance agreed to be due Winthrop *70W. Gilman, and the further sum of $20,000 on account of his distributive share in the estate of the testator.

The testator was a man of large wealth, and by his will directed. the final residue of his estate to be divided equally among his children—surviving children — and the heirs of his three deceased daughters. The appellant and the respondent Winthrop W. Gil-man are two of the testator’s children. Since the testator’s decease, a partial distribution of the residue of the estate has been made,, under the sanction of the surrogate, to several of the residuary legatees. Among them the appellant has been a participant to a greater extent than the amount directed to be paid by the executors to Winthrop W. Gilman on account of his residuary share.

The amount of the residue appeared to this court to have been entirely ample for the payment of the sums directed to be paid out of it, without, in any respect, endangering the payment of any other lawful claims which might be made against it. For that reason, and the further one that the amount directed to be paid "would give Winthrop W. Gilman no more than most of the other residuary legatees had received, the General Term considered that the order in that respect was entirely equitable.

The objection made by the appellant to the order directing the payment, chiefly depended upon a clause contained in the testator’s will, declaring that Winthrop W. Gilman should have no portion of his share of the estate until he fairly accounted for and settled the amount charged on the testator’s books against him for money advanced and interest upon it. This was met by the fact, that it appeared that- a majority of the executors had settled the account with him, with the approval of the surrogate, and had allowed a balance of $6,000, mentioned in the order, in his favor, which this court considered binding on the estate.*

*E. C.*Benedict, for the appellant.

*Charles E. Whitehead*and *Charles H.*Glover, for the respondents.

*

 Murray v. Blatchford, 1 Wend., 583, 616; Chouteau v. Suydam, 21 N. Y., 179, 184.

Opinion by

Daniels, J. .

*71Present—Davis, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.489 Plaquemine Brule Bayou.

The draw of the S91 bridge, mile 8.0 at Estherwood, shall open on signal from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. if at least four hours notice is given. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.

[USCG-2008-0850, 73 FR 51362, Sept. 3, 2008]
#### § 167.150 Off New York Traffic Separation Scheme: General.

The specific areas in the Off New York Traffic Separation Scheme and Precautionary Areas are described in §§ 167.151, 167.152, 167.153, 167.154, and 167.155 of this chapter.

[CGD 84-004, 52 FR 33589, Sept. 4, 1987]
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 10-b


                             AMENDMENT NUMBER SIX
                                      TO
                            AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
                     LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


     Pursuant to approval by the Board of Directors of AmSouth Bancorporation,
the AmSouth Bancorporation Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan is hereby
amended, effective July 20, 1995, by deleting subsections (4) and (5) of
Section 5.6(b) thereof, and inserting the word "and" immediately after
subsection (3), and substituting in lieu of the deleted subsections (4) and (5)
the following:

     "(4)    if the Grantee making the Election is an officer of the Company
within the meaning of Section 16(b), the exercise, lapsing of restrictions and
Elections with respect to Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted
Stock Awards shall be subject to such other limits and restrictions as shall be
imposed by the Committee from time to time to ensure or promote compliance with
Section 16(b) and other applicable laws and regulations."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AmSouth Bancorporation has adopted and approved this
Amendment Number Six to the AmSouth Bancorporation Long Term Incentive
Compensation Plan by act of its Board of Directors and has caused same to be
executed in its name and on its behalf this 5th day of September, 1995 to be
effective as of July 20, 1995.

                                       AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION


                                       By:  /s/ John W. Woods               
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Woods
                                           Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                           Executive Officer
ATTEST:

/s/ Carl L. Gorday      
----------------------------
Assistant Secretary
ACL/AoD/Developmental Disabilities Protection and Advocacy (PADD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2024 Estimated Allocation

3/21/2023

Awards for FY 2024 are based on the FY 2024 President's Budget Request.

Actual awards will be calculated using the latest data points and the 

FY 2024 Congressional Appropriations.

State/Territory

FY 2023 Current 

Level Amounts FY 2024 Estimates

Alabama 571,449 761,856

Alaska 414,977 550,158

Arizona 814,134 1,087,008

Arkansas 427,618 567,259

California 4,466,319 5,963,949

Colorado 612,601 818,266

Connecticut 421,742 560,125

Delaware 414,977 550,158

District of Columbia 414,977 550,158

Florida 2,338,485 3,122,165

Georgia 1,198,637 1,600,195

Hawaii 414,977 550,158

Idaho 414,977 550,158

Illinois 1,468,267 1,960,857

Indiana 702,261 937,763

Iowa 414,977 550,158

Kansas 414,977 550,158

Kentucky 538,283 718,536

Louisiana 565,661 754,985

Maine 414,977 550,158

Maryland 660,790 882,666

Massachusetts 733,673 980,017

Michigan 1,148,516 1,533,690

Minnesota 549,349 732,512

Mississippi 428,380 568,272

Missouri 653,934 873,108

Montana 414,977 550,158

Nebraska 414,977 550,158

Nevada 416,658 553,329

New Hampshire 414,977 550,158

New Jersey 972,486 1,299,006

New Mexico 414,977 550,158

New York 2,316,178 3,092,782

North Carolina 1,163,127 1,553,071

North Dakota 414,977 550,158

Ohio 1,332,932 1,779,904

Oklahoma 462,982 617,146

Oregon 464,736 620,335

Pennsylvania 1,477,222 1,972,793

Rhode Island 414,977 550,158

South Carolina 579,900 774,186

South Dakota 414,977 550,158

Tennessee 753,366 1,006,032

Texas 3,484,044 4,651,766

Utah 414,977 550,158

Vermont 414,977 550,158

Virginia 885,162 1,182,084

Washington 819,607 1,094,803

West Virginia 414,977 550,158

Wisconsin 618,787 826,397

Wyoming 414,977 550,158

American Samoa 222,010 294,331

Guam 222,010 294,331

Northern Mariana Islands 222,010 294,331

Puerto Rico 833,101 915,323

Virgin Islands 222,010 294,331

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. 222,010 294,331

TOTAL $43,875,000 $58,286,843
jQuery(document).on("ready fusion-element-render-fusion_alert",function(e,n){(void 0!==n?jQuery('div[data-cid="'+n+'"]').find(".fusion-alert .close"):jQuery(".fusion-alert .close")).on("click",function(e){e.preventDefault(),jQuery(this).parent().slideUp()})});
§ 137.40 Additional inquiries. ( a ) Persons specified in § 137.1(a) must conduct inquiries in addition to those conducted by the environmental professional under § 137.35 and may provide the information associated with these additional inquiries to the environmental professional responsible for conducting the activities listed in § 137.35— ( 1 ) As required by § 137.55 and if not otherwise obtained by the environmental professional, environmental cleanup liens against the facility and the real property on which it is located that are filed or recorded under Federal, State, tribal, or local law.
( 2 ) As required by § 137.70, specialized knowledge or experience of the person specified in § 137.1(a).
( 3 ) As required by § 137.75, the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located if the oil was not at the facility and the real property on which it is located.
( 4 ) As required by § 137.80 and if not otherwise obtained by the environmental professional, commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the facility and the real property on which it is located.
( b ) [Reserved]