alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

Transforming Conflict through Hip Hop

Hip hop is a music genre developed in the US by inner-city African Americans in the 

1970s. Today hip hop music promotes constructive self-expression and healing among 

youth worldwide. It can stimulate dialogue and promote cross-cultural collaboration 

while serving as a tool for promoting peace and understanding. In this compelling and 

lively presentation, Professor Mark Katz and Rapper Konshens the MC discuss hiphop's history of successful conflict resolution and transformation, including its role in 

their work with the State Department's Next Level international cultural exchange 

program. 

Speakers: Mark Katz, Ph.D

Director, Institute for the Arts and Humanities

Co-Director, Next Level

Professor of Music, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Konshens the MC

Rapper, Educator, Youth Advocate

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy’s 

Alternative Dispute Resolution Office.

Date: Thursday, October 18, 2018

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EDT (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GE-086

(DOE Forrestal Main Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

If you plan to attend in person and you need any special accommodations, or if you plan to attend this 

training online and you need any special accommodations, please contact cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov

no later than September 19, 2018. 

To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD-12 government ID badge, 

must register by email to cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov and provide 1) name, 2) citizenship, and 3) 

agency/employer by October 4, 2018. You do not need to register to call-in or participate online. 

To attend via WebEx, click here for a direct link. You may also go to http://doe.webex.com, enter the 

Meeting Number 902 583 512, and click “Join.” The event password is Adr1234. Follow instructions 

for the audio (select the “I will call in” option for better reception).

To listen only via teleconference, please call 1-415-527-5035 and use access code: 902 583 512. Please

disregard the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit questions to the speaker during 

the program, please use WebEx chat or email elisabeth.bissell@fema.dhs.gov. Materials for this 

presentation will be posted at http://www.adr.gov/events.html several days before the program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000001923
<NAME> ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,519,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,556,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,540
<INVENTORY>                                  1,887,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,498,999
<PP&E>                                      80,383,709
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,247,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,309,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,472,082
<BONDS>                                     41,372,966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,010,039
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,264,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,309,089
<SALES>                                     92,034,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,403,928
<CGS>                                       80,453,853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,453,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,963,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,001)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,551,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                437,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                   166,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   271,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1336 Regulated Navigation Area; Pacific Sound Resources and LockheedShipyard Superfund Sites, Elliott Bay, Seattle, WA. ( a ) *Regulated areas.* The following areas are regulated navigation areas: ( 1 ) All waters inside an area beginning at a point on the shore at 47°35′ 02.7′′ N 122°22′23.00′′ W; thence north to 47°35′26.00′′ N 122°22′23.00′′ W; thence east to 47°35′26.00′′ N 122°21′52.50′′ W; thence south to 47°35′10.80′′ N 122°21′52.50′′ W; thence southwest to a point on the shoreline at 47°35′05.9′′ N 122°21′58.00′′ W. [Datum: NAD 1983].
( 2 ) All waters inside an area beginning at 47°34′ 52.16′′ N 122°21′27.11′′ W; thence to 47°34′ 53.46′′ N 122°21′30.42′′ W; thence to 47°34′ 37.92′′ N 122°21′30.51′′ W; thence to 47°34′ 37.92′′ N 122°21′27.65′′ W. [Datum: NAD 1983].
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) All vessels and persons are prohibited from activities that would disturb the seabed, such as anchoring, dragging, trawling, spudding, or other activities that involve disrupting the integrity of the sediment caps installed in the designated regulated navigation area, pursuant to the remediation efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and others in the Pacific Sound Resources and Lockheed Shipyard EPA superfund sites. Vessels may otherwise transit or navigate within this area without reservation.
( 2 ) The prohibition described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply to vessels or persons engaged in activities associated with remediation efforts in the superfund sites, provided that the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound (COTP), is given advance notice of those activities by the EPA.
( 3 ) Nothing in this section is intended to conflict with treaty fishing rights of the Muckleshoot and Suquamish tribes, and they are not restricted from any type of fishing in the described area.
( c ) *Waivers.* Upon written request stating the need and proposed conditions of the waiver, and any proposed precautionary measures, the COTP may authorize a waiver from this section if the COTP determines that the activity for which the waiver is sought can take place without undue risk to the remediation efforts described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The COTP will consult with EPA in making this determination when necessary and practicable.
[USCG-2010-1145, 77 FR 21435, Apr. 10, 2012]
Exhibit 3.04
                                  ------------

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          AVID SPORTSWEAR & GOLF CORP.

      The  undersigned,  being the President and Secretary of Avid  Sportswear &
Golf Corp. (the "CORPORATION"), hereby declare that the original Articles of the
corporation  were  filed with the  Secretary  of State of the State of Nevada on
September 19, 1997. Pursuant to the provisions of NRS 78.385-390,  the following
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of  Incorporation  of the Corporation were
adopted by majority vote of the  Shareholders  present at a special meeting held
on December 28, 2000, which was duly called and at which a quorum was present:

      FOURTH.   The  amount  of  the  total  authorized  capital  stock  of  the
corporation  shall be One  Hundred  and Sixty  Thousand  Dollars  ($160,000.00),
consisting  of One  Hundred  and Fifty  Million  (150,000,000)  shares of Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share, and 10,000,000  shares of Preferred Stock, par
value $.001 per share.

      THE  UNDERSIGNED,  being the President and Secretary of Avid  Sportswear &
Golf Corp. hereby declare and certify that that the facts herein stated are true
and, accordingly, have hereunto set their hands this 29th day of December, 2000.


/s/ Earl T. Ingarfield                     /s/ Jerry L. Busiere
-----------------------------              -------------------------------------
Earl T. Ingarfield, President              Jerry L. Busiere, Secretary

STATE OF                )
                        ) SS.
COUNTY OF               )

      The  foregoing  instrument  was  acknowledged  before  me this 29th day of
December,  2000, by Earl T.  Ingarfield  and Jerry L. Busiere,  as President and
Secretary of Avid  Sportswear & Golf Corp., a Nevada  corporation,  on behalf of
the corporation,  who are personally known to me or have produced  _____________
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.

                                           NOTARY PUBLIC:

                                           /s/ Jan Blanck
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           (Signature of Notary Public)

                                           /s/ Jan Blanck
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           (Printed Name of Notary Public)

                                           STATE OF

                                           (SEAL)
Exhibit 12**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                                  **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**  **2002**   (Dollars in thousands) Income before taxes $65,709  $110,594  $96,652  $39,773  $33,190 Plus: Fixed Charges                    Interest expense  327,714   212,583   140,762   132,612   179,748 Rent Expense  3,423   2,309   1,956   1,819   1,845                 Total fixedcharges (including interest on deposits)  331,137   214,892   142,718   134,431   181,593 Less: Interest on deposits  (173,380)  (122,212)  (60,279)  (56,030)  (84,408)                Total fixedcharges (excluding interest on deposits)  157,757   92,680   82,439   78,401   97,185                      Income before income taxes and fixed charges(including interest on deposits) $396,846  $325,486  $239,370  $174,204  $214,783 Income before income taxes and fixed charges(excluding interest on deposits) $223,466  $203,274  $179,091  $118,174  $130,375                      Dividend onpreferred stock  —   —   —   7,063   5,070 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    Including interest on deposits  1.20      x   1.51      x   1.68      x   1.30      x   1.18      x Excluding interest on deposits  1.42      x   2.19      x   2.17      x   1.51      x   1.34      x                      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges andpreferred stock dividends                    Including interest on deposits  1.20      x   1.51      x   1.68      x   1.23      x   1.15      x Excluding interest on deposits  1.42      x   2.19      x   2.17      x   1.38      x   1.27      x
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 150/5200-18C - Airport Safety Self-Inspection (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5200-18C
- Title
- Airport Safety Self-Inspection
- Date cancelled
- 2022-09-27
- Cancelled by
- 150/5200-18D
- Cancellation notes
- superseded
- Date issued
- 2004-04-23
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-300, Office of Airport Safety and Operations - Airport Safety & Operations Division 
- Description
-  Provides information to airport operators about airport self-inspection programs and identifies what should be included in such programs. 
- Content
-    -  AC 150/5200-18C  (PDF) 
  -  Errata Sheet for AC 150/5200-18C  (MS Word) 
- Cancels
-  CancelsNumberTitleDate150/5200-29AAnnouncement Of Availability Of Airport Self-Inspection DVD
Announces the availability of the Airport Safety Self-Inspection DVD, which replaces the previously issued videotape. It also corrects a previously released announcement, dated January 31, 2007, that was incorrectly numbered AC 150/5200-18C.
2007-06-05 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
§ 127.1105 Layout and spacing of marine transfer area for LHG. Each new waterfront facility handling LHG, and all new construction in the marine transfer area for LHG of each facility, must comply with the following: ( a ) Each building, shed, and other structure within each marine transfer area for LHG must be located, constructed, or ventilated to prevent the accumulation of flammable or toxic gases within the structure.
( b ) Each impounding space for flammable LHGs located within the area must be designed and located so that the heat flux from a fire over the impounding space does not cause, to a vessel, damage that could prevent the vessel's movement.
( c ) Each manifold, loading arm, or independent mating flange must be located at least 60 meters (197 feet) from each of the following structures, if that structure is intended primarily for the use of the general public or of railways: ( 1 ) A bridge crossing a navigable waterway.
( 2 ) The entrance to, or the superstructure of, a tunnel under a navigable waterway.
( d ) Each manifold, loading arm, or independent mating flange must be located at least 30 meters (98.5 feet) from each public roadway or railway.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.100 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this subchapter is: ( 1 ) To implement portions of the maritime security regime required by the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, as codified in 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701;
( 2 ) To align, where appropriate, the requirements of domestic maritime security regulations with the international maritime security standards in the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS Chapter XI-2) and the International Code for the Security of Ships and of Port Facilities, parts A and B, adopted on 12 December 2002; and
( 3 ) To ensure security arrangements are as compatible as possible for vessels trading internationally.
( b ) For those maritime elements of the national transportation system where international standards do not directly apply, the requirements in this subchapter emphasize cooperation and coordination with local port community stakeholders, and are based on existing domestic standards, as well as established industry security practices.
( c ) The assessments and plans required by this subchapter are intended for use in implementing security measures at various MARSEC Levels. The specific security measures and their implementation are planning criteria based on a set of assumptions made during the development of the security assessment and plan. These assumptions may not exist during an actual transportation security incident.
[USCG-2003-14792, 68 FR 39278, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60470, Oct. 22, 2003]
Argued and submitted June 29,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing September 30,

reconsideration denied December 16, 1992,

petition for review allowed January 26, 1993 (315 Or 311)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*TREVOR SHANE MILLER, *Appellant.*

(10-90-09150; CA A68351)

838 P2d 79

Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

*307WARREN, P. J.

*308WARREN, P. J.

Defendant challenges the sentences imposed after he pled guilty to ten charges arising from three separate incidents. He was sentenced at a single hearing. He concedes that, in the sentences relating to the first incident, the primary offense would be either his conviction for sodomy or for rape, both within grid block 9-H, with a presumptive sentence of 37 to 38 months. *See OAR*253-03-001(17). The maximum presumptive consecutive term would be 76 months. OAR 253-12-020(2)(b). He argues that the court erred when it imposed a consecutive sentence on his burglary conviction according to the criminal history scale, instead of under OAR 253-12-020.

The state concedes that, ‘ ‘[sjtrictly applying the rule, defendant would be correct.” Under OAR 253-12-020(2)(a), after imposition of the sentence for the primary offense, consecutive sentences are calculated in column I. However, the state argues that the sentencing court erred in rating the burglary as having a crime seriousness category 8. It contends that defendant pled guilty to an indictment containing the aggravation language that he “caused or threatened to cause physical injury to [the victim], ’ ’ which places the conviction in crime seriousness category 9. It contends that the court’s error resulted in a 17-month reduction of incarceration time in defendant’s favor and that, therefore, he cannot complain.1 Under ORS 138.222(7), the state may appeal a sentence, but it did not. We will not consider its argument.

Defendant is also correct that the court erred in sentencing him on the offenses arising from the first incident and then using those convictions to increase his criminal history category from H to A. Convictions for which sentences are imposed at the same time are not counted in the criminal history, regardless of the rules governing prior criminal history. *State v. Bucholz,*113 Or App 705, 834 P2d 456 (1992); *State v. Seals,*113 Or App 700, 833 P2d 1344 (1992).

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

1

 The state relies on *State v. Tremillion,*111 Or App 375, 826 P2d 95, *rev den*313 Or 300 (1992), where the sentence from which the defendant appealed was to be served concurrently with another sentence and could not affect the actual period of incarceration. Here, however, defendant’s assigned error does affect the length of incarceration.
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: Indiana Family and Social Services Administration 

Name of ADRCs and Healthcare Partners: 

ADRC of CICOA, Indiana University Geriatrics Program, Wishard Memorial Hospital and the 

Indianapolis VA Medical Center 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Susan Waschevski 

 Susan.Waschevski@fssa.IN.gov

 317-232-7148 

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of 

Elders (GRACE) 

Project Summary: 

This grant will build upon the GRACE model, which currently exists at Wishard and the 

Indianapolis VA, and integrate the ADRC care mangers component that will not only 

complement the GRACE services but also build a stronger relationship between veterans and the 

ADRCs. 

Goal/Objectives: 

The goals of this project are: 1) to integrate of CICOA care managers into the hospital discharge 

planning process at the Indianapolis VA and to provide timely, on-site access to comprehensive 

Options Counseling, care management and when appropriate, Preadmission Screening; 2) to 

more effectively coordinate hospital/ADRC planning process to support a more complete 

consumer/family discharge planning process; 3) to support, at the consumer’s/family’s option, 

access to high quality community-based long-term care supports with increased discharge to 

community-based settings and reduced reliance on nursing home care; and 4) when a consumer 

elects to reside in the community, to ensure linkage with physicians and other health care 

supports with a goal of preventing hospital readmission or nursing home admission. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

Key system outcomes are: 1) supporting information to aid in replication of the model across the 

state; 2) a reduction in nursing home admissions and long-stay placements, defined as greater 

than 90 days, and hospital readmissions, measured on a per person, admission, and days basis; 

and 3) an enhanced ADRC program that achieves more timely and effective person centered 

discharge planning and care transitions through collaboration with hospital and physician 

partners.
Engage

at everyAge

oam.acl.gov
#### AMERICAN SULPHITE PULP CO. v. HINCKLEY FIBRE CO.

(District Court, N. D. New York.

September 4, 1916.)

Patents <@=>328—Infringement—Pulp Digester.

The Russell reissue patent, No. 11,282 (original No. 445,235), for a pulp digester, *held*infringed.

In Equity. Suit by the American Sulphite Pulp Company against the Hinckley Fibre Company. On motion for rehearing and to vacate decree entered.

Motion granted, and decree for complainant.

For prior opinion, see 217 Fed. 57.

Benner & Brown, of Boston, Mass., for the motion.

Henry Schreiter, of New York City, opposed.

RAY, District Judge.

The reissued letters patent in suit, to George F. Russell, No. 11,282, dated November 15, 1892, long since expired, and there can be no injunction.

In deciding this case (217 Fed. 57), attention was centered on the Panzl patent, and the question whether defendant was using that patented composition, or the Russell composition, and lost sight of the fact that defendant had used the Russell patented composition in certain cases and for certain lengths of time, and hence was an infringer.

The motion is granted, and the decree dismissing the bill vacated, but only one-half costs and disbursements are allowed, as both parties succeed in part.

In the decree for complainant, signed and filed herewith, I have found it necessary to state the facts as to infringing acts, and it is not necessary to repeat them here.