CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST (Electronic Format)

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ***

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain information and documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for
approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist you in determining that all necessary materials are included in rules packages sent to the ARB for submittal to the EPA, please fill out the following form and include it with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB's Guidelines on the Implementation of the 40 CFR 51,
Appendix V , for a more detailed explanation than is provided here. Adopted rules and rule amendments should be checked against U.S. EPA's Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies (Little Blue Book, August 21, 2001) to ensure that they contain no elements which will result in disapproval by EPA.

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Rule No: 701

Rule Title: Air Pollution Emergen cy Contingency Actions

Date Adopted or Amended: 05/20/14

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Note: All documents should be in electronic format. Items that have signatures, initials, or stamps may be scanned.

Not

Attached Attached N/A

COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy of the entire
rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.

UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE : If an amended rule,

provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and strikeout

format all language which has been added, deleted, or c hanged since the rule

was last adopted or amended. **(See Staff Report Appendix A)**

COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule which

includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that other
rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submitt ed to EPA as part of a previous SIP submittal.

PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping

certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy of the actual published

not ice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough of the newspaper page must be included to show the date of publication. The notice must specifically identify by title and number
each rule adopted or amende d. **(See Staff Report Appendix B)**

RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified resolution

or minute order. This document must include certification that the hearing

was held in accordance with the information in th e public notice. It must also list the rules that were adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code

Sections 40725

- 40728 (Administrative Procedures Act).

PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of wri tten public

comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the District staff or presented to the District Board at the public hearing. A summary of the public comments and
responses is ade quate. If there were no comments made during the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left. **(See Staff Report Appendix C)** 

5/1/2002CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST (Electronic Format)

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ***

RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule

Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

NON

- EPA TEST METHODS: Attach al l test methods that are referenced in

your rule that do not appear in 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, 63, or have not been

previously submitted to EPA. EPA methods used in other media such as SW846 for solid waste are not automatically approved for air pollution
appli cations. Submittal of test methods that are not EPA

- approved should include the information and follow the procedure described in Region 9’s “Test

Method Review & Evaluation Process.”

MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate. In general, modeling support

is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone
levels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxat ion that affects large sources ( > 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PM10, CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in

emissio n patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP accounts for the relaxation and provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. If
current EPA modeling guidelines we re not used, then new modeling may be
required.

ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM

EPA POLICIES : The District staff report or other information included with the submittal should discuss all potential relaxations or deviations from RACT,

RACM, BACT, BACM, enfor ceability, attainment, RFP, or other relevant EPA requirements. This includes, for example, demonstrating that exemptions or emission limits less stringent than the presumptive RACT (e.g., a CTG) meet
EPA’s 5 percent policy, and demonstrating that all sou rce categories exempted from a RACM/BACM rule are de minimus according to EPA’s RACM/BACM policy. **(See Staff Report)**

ADDITIONAL MATERIALS : Provide District staff reports and any other

supporting information concerning development of the rule or rule changes. This information should explain the basis for all limits and thresholds

contained in the rule.

5/1/2002