alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 154.1029 Worst case discharge. ( a ) The response plan must use the appropriate criteria in this section to develop the worst case discharge.
( b ) For the MTR segment of a facility, not less than— ( 1 ) Where applicable, the loss of the entire capacity of all in-line and break out tank(s) needed for the continuous operation of the pipelines used for the purposes of handling or transporting oil, in bulk, to or from a vessel regardless of the presence of secondary containment; plus
( 2 ) The discharge from all piping carrying oil between the marine transfer manifold and the non-transportation-related portion of the facility. The discharge from each pipe is calculated as follows: The maximum time to discover the release from the pipe in hours, plus the maximum time to shut down flow from the pipe in hours (based on historic discharge data or the best estimate in the absence of historic discharge data for the facility) multiplied by the maximum flow rate expressed in barrels per hour (based on the maximum relief valve setting or maximum system pressure when relief valves are not provided) plus the total line drainage volume expressed in barrels for the pipe between the marine manifold and the non-transportation-related portion of the facility; and
( c ) For a mobile facility it means the loss of the entire contents of the container in which the oil is stored or transported.
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 18-1267V 

 Filed: July 12, 2019 

UNPUBLISHED 

RYAN BRONSON, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) 

   

Tonya Anne Oliver, Bichler, Oliver, Longo & Fox PLLC, Tampa, FL, for petitioner. 

Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On August 22, 2018, Ryan Bronson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he developed Guillain-Barré syndrome 

(“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 15, 2015. 

Petition at ¶¶1-21. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters. 

On July 10, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, respondent states “that petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

                                                            

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 
2

recently revised Vaccine Injury Table (‘Table’) and the Qualifications and Aids to 

Interpretation (‘QAI’), which afford petitioner a presumption of causation if: the diagnosis 

of GBS is sound; the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a 

seasonal flu vaccination; and, there is no identified more likely alternative diagnosis.” 

Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner suffered the residual effects of his 

GBS for more than six months and therefore, petitioner has satisfied all legal 

prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. 

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
#### § 155.700 Designation of person in charge.

Each operator or agent of a vessel with a capacity of 250 or more barrels of fuel oil, cargo oil, hazardous material, or liquefied gas as regulated in Table 4 of 46 CFR part 154, or each person who arranges for and hires a person to be in charge of a transfer of fuel oil, of a transfer of liquid cargo in bulk, or of cargo-tank cleaning, shall designate, either by name or by position in the crew, the person in charge (PIC) of each transfer to or from the vessel and of each tank-cleaning.

[CGD 79-116, 62 FR 25126, May 8, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         218,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      521
<ALLOWANCES>                                        58
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,077
<PP&E>                                          21,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,447
<BONDS>                                          1,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           541
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,670
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   940
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,289)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.86)


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.655 What are the requirements for helicopter fueling facilities?

Helicopter fueling facilities must comply with 46 CFR 108.489 or an equivalent standard.
#### § 118.140 Painting bridge piers.

The District Commander may require painting the sides of bridge channel piers below the superstructure facing traffic white or yellow when they are significantly darkened by weathering or other causes so as to be poorly visible against a dark background.

[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16314, May 2, 1986]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Report on Form 10-QSB of Sona Development Corp.
      (“Registrant”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I,
      Mitchell Maxwell, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            This
                Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the
                period
                covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for
                the
                period covered by this Report.





May
      15,
      2008





/s/
                Mitchell MaxwellMitchell
                MaxwellChief
                Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
      by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
      the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1097 Sheboygan River. The draw of the Eighth Street bridge, mile 0.69 at Sheboygan, shall open as follows: ( a ) From May 1 through October 31— ( 1 ) Between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., the bridge shall open on signal, except that: ( i ) From 6:10 a.m. to 7:10 p.m., Monday through Saturday, the draw need open only at 10 minutes after the hour, on the half-hour, and 10 minutes before the hour; and
( ii ) From Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not open between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., between 12 p.m. and 1 p.m., and between 4:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.
( 2 ) Between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least 2 hours advance notice is provided.
( b ) From November 1 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours advance notice is provided.
( c ) At all times, the draw shall open as soon as possible for public vessels of the United States, state or local government vessels used for public safety, vessels in distress, vessels seeking shelter from rough weather, or any other emergency.
[CGD09-98-003, 63 FR 49288, Sept. 15, 1998]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15e)
for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosre controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect
the Companys internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Kevin D. Lemley
EXHIBIT 13.1




                         CERTIFICATION OF ALFREDO PARRA
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





                                      -1-


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 13.1




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Rochester Resources Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Alfredo Parra, Chief
Executive Officer,  President and Director of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.



/s/ Alfredo Parra
----------------------------------
Alfredo Parra,
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Director



                                      -2-

<PAGE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 72 

Acknowledging the severity of the wetland loss occurring in Louisiana and 

supporting the observance of World Wetlands Day in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2007 

Ms. LANDRIEU submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

RESOLUTION 

Acknowledging the severity of the wetland loss occurring 

in Louisiana and supporting the observance of World 

Wetlands Day in the United States. 

Whereas Louisiana’s coastal wetlands are among the Nation’s 

most diverse and productive ecosystems, home to ospreys, 

egrets, alligators, shellfish, turtles, sea grasses, and bald 

cypress trees; 

Whereas Louisiana’s wetlands are eroding at a rate of 25 

square miles per year and, as a result of Hurricane 

Katrina on August 29, 2005, and Hurricane Rita on 

September 24, 2005, 217 square miles of wetlands were 

turned into open water, significantly advancing Louisiana’s wetlands loss; 

Whereas the State has lost 2,100 square miles of coastal wetlands since the 1930s and is expected to lose another 500 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 72 IS 

square miles over the next 50 years if nothing is done to 

mitigate wetland loss; 

Whereas 2,000,000 residents, more than 50 percent of the 

State’s population, live within Louisiana’s coastal zone; 

Whereas Louisiana’s working wetlands provide protection for 

coastal communities and for oil and gas pipelines that 

serve as the major energy artery in the United States, 

delivering more than 25 percent of the Nation’s energy; 

Whereas wetland ecosystems throughout the United States 

are threatened by erosion, invasive species, runoff, and 

habitat loss; and 

Whereas World Wetlands Day is celebrated around the world 

on February 2 of each year by government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and groups of citizens in the 

global community: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) acknowledges the severity of the wetland 

3 loss occurring in Louisiana; 

4 (2) recognizes and supports the observance of 

5 World Wetlands Day in the United States; and 

6 (3) supports efforts to raise awareness about 

7 the critical need to sustain and preserve wetlands in 

8 Louisiana, the United States, and throughout the 

9 world. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.43 Discharges of clean and segregated ballast: Seagoing tank vessels of 150 gross tons or more. ( a ) Clean ballast may not be discharged overboard unless the discharge is verified as clean ballast through use of an approved oil discharge monitoring and control system or, if discharged before the required oil discharge monitoring and control system installation date, by visual examination of the ballast contents immediately before discharge. This paragraph applies to discharges of clean ballast: ( 1 ) From dedicated clean ballast tanks; and
( 2 ) Into the navigable waters of the United States from any other tank.
( b ) Segregated ballast may not be discharged overboard unless a visual examination, or a test of the ballast contents with an oil/water interface detector, immediately before the discharge shows that there is no oily mixture in the ballast. Use of an oil discharge monitoring and control system is not required. This paragraph applies to discharges of segregated ballast: ( 1 ) Into the navigable waters of the United States; and
( 2 ) Below the waterline at sea from an existing vessel that does not have an above the waterline discharge point for segregated ballast.
( c ) All discharges of clean ballast and segregated ballast must be through an above waterline discharge point described in § 157.11(b)(2), except that: ( 1 ) A vessel may discharge clean ballast and segregated ballast below the waterline when in port or at an offshore terminal.
( 2 ) A vessel may discharge clean ballast and segregated ballast at sea by gravity below the waterline.
( 3 ) An existing vessel that does not have above waterline discharge points for dedicated clean ballast tanks may discharge clean ballast from those tanks below the waterline at sea.
( 4 ) An existing vessel that does not have above waterline discharge points for segregated ballast tanks may discharge segregated ballast below the waterline at sea.
( d ) This section applies only to seagoing tank vessels of 150 gross tons or more.
[CGD 76-088b, 48 FR 45721, Oct. 6, 1983; 48 FR 46985, Oct. 17, 1983; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001; USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3382, Jan. 16, 2009]
Exhibit 31(b)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Mark J. Thomas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: September 14, 2005 /s/ Mark J. Thomas   Mark J. Thomas   Chief Financial Officer