alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Glenn A. Kleinert, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer (s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 24,  2004







/s/ Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 110.210 San Diego Harbor, CA.

(a) *The anchorage grounds.*

(1) Special anchorage for U.S. Government vessels (NAD 83). The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| 32°42′13.2′′ N | 117°14′11.0′′ W |
| 32°41′12.0′′ N | 117°14′00.3′′ W |

and thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.

(2) *Special anchorage for U.S. Government vessels (NAD 83).* The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| 32°43′25.6′′ N | 117°12′46.1′′ W |
| 32°43′25.3′′ N | 117°12′52.0′′ W |
| 32°43′08.2′′ N | 117°12′58.0′′ W |
| 32°42′57.9′′ N | 117°12′54.0′′ W |

and thence easterly along the northern boundary of the channel to:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| 32°43′05.0′′ N | 117°11′30.5′′ W |
| 32°43′27.2′′ N | 117°11′14.0′′ W |

and thence along the shoreline of Harbor Island to the point of beginning.

(3) *“B” Street Merchant Vessel Anchorage (NAD 83).* The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| 32°43′00.8′′ N | 117°10′36.3′′ W |
| 32°43′00.8′′ N | 117°11′23.0′′ W |
| 32°43′05.0′′ N | 117°11′30.5′′ W |
| 32°43′27.2′′ N | 117°11′14.0′′ W |
| 32°43′20.2′′ N | 117°10′53.0′′ W |

and thence due east to the shoreline, and thence along the shoreline and pier to the point of beginning.

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) The anchorages described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section are reserved exclusively for the anchorage of vessels of the United States Government and of authorized harbor pilot boats. No other vessels shall anchor in this area except by special permission obtained in advance from the Commander, Naval Base, San Diego, CA. The administration of these anchorages is exercised by the Commander, Naval Base, San Diego, CA.

(2) The area described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section is reserved for the use of merchant vessels calling at the Port of San Diego while awaiting a berth. The administration of this anchorage is exercised by the Port Director, San Diego Unified Port District.

(3) Vessels anchoring in San Diego Harbor shall leave a free passage for other craft and shall not obstruct the approaches to the wharves in the harbor.

[CGD11-85-06, 51 FR 19753, June 2, 1986, as amended by CGD11-90-08, 56 FR 9852, Mar. 8, 1991]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Bonneville Power Administration 

# AGENCY:

Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy (DOE). 

# ACTION:

Notice of floodplain and wetlands involvement. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces BPA's proposal to fund construction of a supplementation hatchery facility for the Coeur d'Alene Tribe in floodplain and wetlands located in Kootenai and Benewah Counties, Idaho. In accordance with DOE regulations for compliance with floodplain and wetlands environmental review requirements, BPA will prepare a floodplain and wetlands assessment. The assessment will be included in the environmental assessment being prepared for the proposed project in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. A floodplain statement of findings will be included in any finding of no significant impact that may be issued following the completion of the environmental assessment. 

# DATES:

Comments are due to the address below no later than June 20, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Submit comments to Communications, Bonneville Power Administration—KC-7, P.O. Box 12999, Portland, Oregon 97212. Internet address: comment@bpa.gov. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Eric N. Powers—KECN-4, Bonneville Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon, 97208-3621, phone number 503-230-5823, fax number 503-230-5699. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The project would involve construction of a fish hatchery and two acclimation ponds. The hatchery would be located within the 100-year floodplain of Rock Creek (T47N, R4W, Section 31); the acclimation sites would affect wetlands associated with the tributaries of Benewah Creek (T45N, R3W, Section 17) and Alder Creek (T45N, R3W, Section 33). 

Maps and further information are available from BPA at the address above. 

Issued in Portland, Oregon, on May 25, 2000. 

Thomas C. McKinney, 

NEPA Compliance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-13968 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         179,176
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,309
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       154,938
<OTHER-SE>                                     (54,135)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,112
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,304,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,304,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,304,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,304,048)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.21)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51037 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE MENCHACA, also known as Joe Menchaca, also known as Joe L. Menchaca, also known as Jose Luis Menchaca, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-98-CR-96-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - July 6, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * José Menchaca appeals his jury conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a firearm with obliterated serial numbers. He contends that his statement made to the police should have been suppressed at trial because he was not advised of his Miranda 1 rights. No motion to suppress was filed in the district court and thus any argument with respect theretoNo. 98-51037 -2- is waived. See United States v. Chavez-Valencia , 116 F.3d 127, 130 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 325 (1997); F ED . R. C RIM . P. 12(b)(3). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2866-008]

      ( print page 35630)    
In accordance with the National Environmental Police Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 CFR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the Lockport Hydroelectric Project, and has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA). The project is located on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, in Will County, Illinois.

The DEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference Room, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. The DEA may also be reviewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (please call (202) 208-222 for assistance).

Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this notice and should be addressed to David P. Boergers, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. For further information, contact Hector M. Perez, Project Coordinator, at (202) 219-2843.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13919 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
"Document has been coded “B” may be requested 

 under the Freedom of Information Act 

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/foia/ but access is restricted to entities not 

engaged in the production sale or distribution of pesticides outside the United 

States." Completion of the Affirmation of Non-Multinational Status for is 

required - http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/foia/affirmation.htm
Exhibit 32(a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energen Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies with respect to the registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated as of August 1, 2011





By/s/ J. T. McManus, IIJ. T. McManus, IIChairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of EnergenCorporationBy/s/ Charles W. Porter, Jr.Charles W. Porter, Jr.Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer of EnergenCorporation





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Energen Corporation and will be retained by Energen Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### FREDERICKA SCHRUMM *v.*ERIC SCHRUMM

(AC 19688)

O’Connell, C. J., and Spear and Mihalakos, Js.

Submitted on briefs January 26

officially released February 15, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1:

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Mobility Electronics, Inc. (the
"Company"), certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

         1. The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


November 19, 2002                      /s/ Charles R. Mollo
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                          Charles R. Mollo
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99(b)

Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC

Statement of
Collection Account Balances as of

December 31, 2010

The balances in the sub-accounts on deposit with the trustee as of the above date were:



|                                  |  |               |  |               |               |  |               |   |               | 
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | ------------- | ------------- |  | ------------- | - | ------------- | 
|                                  |  |               |  | Series 2003-1 |               |  | Series 2004-1 |  
|                                  |  |               | 
|General Sub-Account               |  |               |  | $             | 26,318,061.14 |  |               | $ | 13,935,340.78 | 
|Capital Sub-Account               |  |               |  | $             | 2,500,372.00  |  |               | $ | 3,948,990.47  | 
|Overcollateralization Sub-Account |  |               |  | $             | 1,373,201.20  |  |               | $ | 2,139,013.09  | 
|Reserve Sub-Account               |  |               |  | $             | 1.48          |  |               | $ | 3,525,873.32  | 
|                                  |  |               | 
|REP Deposit Account *             |  | $5,362,954.78 |  |               |               |  |               |   |               | 



|* | REP deposits are held in one account with a sub-ledger outlining the respective amount of each REPs deposit attributable to each series of bonds.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 109.01 Purpose.

The purpose of the rules and regulations in this subchapter is to implement certain laws and set forth the requirements for anchorage areas.

[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17727, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by CGD 79-096, 44 FR 51585, Sept. 4, 1979; USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35526, June 30, 1998]
Rockingham

No. 6352

#### Franklin Wilson and Walter Bamford d.b.a. B & W Sand & Gravel Co. v. James LeGrice

September 28, 1973

*Sayer & Giordano,*for the plaintiffs, filed no brief.

*James LeGrice,*defendant, by brief, pro se.

Per curiam.

This is an action on the case to recover the balance claimed due for labor and materials furnished under an oral contract between the parties. A trial by the court resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs for $600. The defendant's exceptions were reserved and transferred by *Keller,*C.J.

*486The plaintiff Wilson testified that he agreed to install two separate septic tank systems with leach fields and fills for the service of the defendant’s apartments, at a price of $2400, and that he fulfilled this contract. It is undisputed that he has been paid $1800. The defendant claimed that the plaintiffs also agreed to make connections between the apartments and the tanks. This the plaintiffs denied.

The contradictions between the parties, who were the only witnesses, were severe, but as we have repeatedly held, such conflicts were for the trial court to resolve. *Clover &c. Co. v. Smith Co.,*96 N.H. 491, 79 A.2d 8 (1951); *Streeter v. New England Box Co.,*106 N.H. 146, 148, 207 A.2d 423, 424 (1965). An examination of the entire record discloses no errors and that the evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

All concurred.
§ 154.1025 Operating restrictions and interim operating authorization. ( a ) The owner or operator of an MTR facility who submitted a response plan prior to May 29, 1996, may elect to comply with any of the provisions of this final rule by revising the appropriate section of the previously submitted plan in accordance with § 154.1065. An owner or operator of an MTR facility who elects to comply with all sections of this final rule must resubmit the plan in accordance with § 154.1060 of this part.
( b ) No facility subject to this subpart may handle, store, or transport oil unless it is operating in full compliance with a submitted response plan. No facility categorized under § 154.1015(c) as a significant and substantial harm facility may handle, store, or transport oil unless the submitted response plan has been approved by the COTP. The owner or operator of each new facility to which this subpart applies must submit a response plan meeting the requirements listed in § 154.1017 not less than 60 days prior to handling, storing, or transporting oil. Where applicable, the response plan shall be submitted along with the letter of intent required under § 154.110.
( c ) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, a facility categorized under § 154.1015(c) as a significant and substantial harm facility may continue to handle, store, or transport oil for 2 years after the date of submission of a response plan, pending approval of that plan. To continue to handle, store, or transport oil without a plan approved by the COTP, the facility owner or operator shall certify in writing to the COTP that the owner or operator has ensured, by contract or other approved means as described in § 154.1028(a), the availability of the necessary private personnel and equipment to respond, to the maximum extend practicable to a worst case discharge or substantial threat of such a discharge from the facility. Provided that the COTP is satisfied with the certification of response resources provided by the owner or operator of the facility, the COTP will provide written authorization for the facility to handle, store, or transport oil while the submitted response plan is being reviewed. Pending approval of the submitted response plan, deficiencies noted by the COTP must be corrected in accordance with § 154.1070.
( d ) A facility may not continue to handle, store, or transport oil if— ( 1 ) The COTP determines that the response resources identified in the facility certification statement or reference response plan do not substantially meet the requirements of this subpart;
( 2 ) The contracts or agreements cited in the facility's certification statement or referenced response plans are no longer valid;
( 3 ) The facility is not operating in compliance with the submitted plan;
( 4 ) The response plan has not been resubmitted or approved within the last 5 years; or
( 5 ) The period of the authorization under paragraph (c) of this section has expired.