alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-950-1420-00-P]


Filing of Plats of Survey; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The plats of the following described lands were officially filed in 
the Wyoming State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 
effective 10:00 a.m., May 23, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Ninth Auxillary Meridian West, through Township 54 North, between 
Ranges 76 and 77 West, a portion of the South boundary, the East and 
North boundaries and a portion of the subdivisional lines, T. 54 N., R. 
76 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 511, was accepted 
May 18, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Ninth Auiliary Meridian West, through Township 55 North, between Ranges 
76 and 77 West, the East boundary and a portion of the subdivisional 
lines, T. 55 N., R. 76 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 
511, was accepted May 18, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Fourteenth Standard Parallel North, through Range 76 West, a portion of 
the South boundary, the East boundary and a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, T. 56 N., R. 76 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, 
Wyoming, Group No. 511, was accepted May 18, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Thirteenth Standard Parallel North, through Range 76 West, the East 
boundary and a portion of the subdivisional lines, T. 53 N., R. 76 W., 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 585, was accepted May 18, 
2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of the subdivisional 
lines, T. 42 N., R. 74 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 
601, was accepted May 18, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Tenth Standard Parallel North, through Range 74 West, the North 
boundary and the subdivisional lines, T. 41 N., R. 74 W., Sixth 
Principal Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 601, was accepted May 18, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of Mineral Survey No. 
246, T. 29 N., Rs. 99 and 100 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, 
Group No. 627, was accepted May 18, 2000.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of the South boundary 
and a portion of the East boundary, T. 43 N., R. 67 W., Sixth Principal 
Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 635, was accepted May 18, 2000.

    Dated: May 23, 2000.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Survey Group.
[FR Doc. 00-13866 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### § 110.128 Columbia River at Portland, Oreg.

The waters of the Columbia River between Sand Island and Government Island, bounded on the west by pile dike U.S. 5.75 and a line extending true north from the northerly end of the dike to the south shore of Sand Island and bounded on the east by a line bearing 339°15′ true, from a point on Government Island at latitude 45°35′10′′, longitude 122°32′41′′, to the southerly shore of Sand Island.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00128

- CV
United Specialty Insurance Company v. Wasp Construction, LLC
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 1928

- 17

- D(1)

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPE ALS, h aving considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , United Specialty Insurance Compan y, and Knightbrook Insurance Company , as surety on the supersedeas bond. We further order this decision certifie d below for observance. October 29 , 2020
Order entered March 10 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01235
- CV DAVID ALAN SHEPHERD, Appellant

V. LAWRENCE MITCHELL, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. DC
- 10
- 07702



### O RDER
W e GRANT appellant’s March 4, 2015 motion for extension of time and ORDER the brief tendered to the Court on March 4, 2015 filed as of the date of this order

. Appellee’s brief is due no later than April 9 , 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
477 P.2d 502

#### Wendell R. BRAINARD, Dorothy P. Brainard, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. EQUITY METALS, INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10619.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Dec. 4, 1970.

James F. Judd, Post Falls, William C. Harrison, Spokane, Wash., for appellant.

Robert P. Dwyer, Kellogg, Dennis E. Wheeler, Wallace, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Suit by plaintiffs-respondents for wages due for month of February, 1968, which were withheld by defendant-appellant, together with costs, interest and statutory penalties. As a defense it was alleged that plaintiffs had performed their duties in an unsatisfactory and negligent manner and defendant cross-claimed for damages. Following trial to the Court sitting without a jury, the Court found that plaintiffs had performed their duties in a satisfactory manner, that there had been no material breach by plaintiffs of the employment contract, and that defendant had failed to prove its cross-claim for damages. The record discloses that the findings of the trial court are supported by competent and substantial' evidence and thus they are binding and conclusive on appeal. Olsen v. *880Hawkins, 90 Idaho 28, 408 P.2d 462 (1965) ; Clayton v. Jones, 91 Idaho 87, 416 P.2d 34 (1966). It is noted that much of the "evidence” relied upon by appellant as supporting its assignments of error was testimony which was either ordered stricken by the trial court or so ambiguous as to give only the most tenuous and marginal support to appellant’s allegations. Appellant assigns error in the conclusion of law of the trial 'court to the effect that payment of wages in previous months by appellant to respondents had condoned any alleged unsatisfactory or negligent conduct by respondents as employees during those previous months. We find the authorities cited by appellant in support of that assignment of error not in point. Affirmed. Costs to respondents.
The forecasts in the Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports
Commodity Highlights

The forecast for fiscal 1999 exports of U.S. wheat and flour remains


The fiscal 1999 forecast for U.S. coarse grain exports is raised 2.3


concessional sales to Indonesia and Russia of 100,000 tons each and

expected continued strong rough rice shipments to Brazil.

Reflecting only minor adjustments in the forecast, fiscal 1999 U.S.

oilseed and product exports are lowered 500,000 tons and $160 million

to 35.1 million tons valued at $9.3 billion. Soybean shipments are

down slightly to 23.1 million tons, but somewhat higher unit values

than in August, resulting from smaller than anticipated domestic

production and stocks, leave value unchanged at $5.1 billion. This

forecast reflects an average export unit value of $222/ton for


This outlook assumes continued strong sales to Mexico, but reflects the

threat of a slowdown in the rapid growth of sales to Canada since the

U.S. dollar has appreciated against the Canadian dollar. Furthermore,

Japan’s economic recession and continued weakness in other Asian

economies will continue to hamper exports to Asia. But on the positive



pull down the value of U.S. agricultural exports to all regions in

fiscal 1999. But, the decline is expected to be spread more evenly

across the regions in 1999 than it was in 1998.

Trade with major markets, Canada and Mexico, while down, likely will

remain the strongest. With lower prices, export value to Canada will

Table 4--U.S. agricultural exports: Value by region, 1996-99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal Fiscal 1999

Region 1996 1997 1998 Forecast

----------------------------------------------------------------------- --Billion dollars--

Asia 26.018 23.873 19.668 18.0

 Japan 11.882 10.713 9.459 8.8



Exports to countries in Latin Uin erica also are expected to slow in

fiscal 1999, with Brazil and Venezuela projected at $500 million each

and the rest of Latin Uierica, other than Mexico, slipping to $4.2

billion. Of these countries, Brazil is likely to show the greatest

drop as fiscal and monetary policies tighten.

Exports to the Middle East, Africa, and Oceania are each projected




The major sources of imported vegetables are Canada, Mexico, and the 

European Union. Canada is expected to supply a greater share of fresh

tomatoes and potatoes in fiscal 1999. Imports of fresh vegetables from

Mexico should continue at a steady pace through fiscal 1999.

As growth in U.S. household income slows over the next year, spending

on foreign beverages should weaken. The import pace of wine and malt

beverages slowed in the past year, yet is still forecast to rise 9

percent in value next year. Projected imports are expected to reach

$3.8 billion, a $200-million reduction from the August forecast.

The forecast for grains and feeds is higher at $3 billion and 6.5
From: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Wendy Blake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/13/2010 03:22 PM

Subject: RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing
NESHAP Draft NPRM

Hi Heidi,

Attached below is the draft baseline mercury emissions inventory for 112(c)(6).

Thanks.

Chuck

(See attached file: draft 112c6 summary for mercury 4

‐ 12

‐ 2010.xls)Sl nera ti 

### 1 8000 1 01% 166 0 92 90% Draft ‐ Do Not Cite or Quote ‐ for Internal EPA Review ‐ 4/8/2010



### Mercury Emissions Baseline Inventory for the Section 112(c)(6) Program

Categories Subject to Existing MACT Standards Emissions (T/yr) Percent of
Total Cumulative tons/yr Cumulative
Percent Aerospace Industry (Major) 

### 0.1000 0.06% 0.1 0.06% Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (Major and Area) 

### 9.8000 5.49% 9.9 5.54% Hazardous Waste Incineration (Major and Area) 

### 3.2000 1.79% 13.1 7.33% Lightweight Aggregate Kilns (Major and Area) 

### 0.3100 0.17% 13.4 7.51%

Portland Cement Manufacturing: Hazardous Waste Kilns (Major) 

### 2.7500 1.54% 16.2 9.04%

Pulp and Paper – Kraft Recovery Furnaces (Major) 

### 1.9000 1.06% 18.1 10.11% Secondary Lead Smelting (Major and Area) 

### 0.0113 0.01% 18.1 10.11% Medical Waste Incinerators (Major and Area) 

### 50.0000 27.98% 68.1 38.10% Portland Cement: Non-Hazardous Waste Kilns (Major and Area) 

### 5.6400 3.16% 73.7 41.26% Municipal Waste Combustors (Major and Area) 

### 55.0000 30.78% 128.7 72.04% Electric Arc Furnaces (EAF) (Area) - Secondary Steel 

### 7.8000 4.37% 136.5 76.41% Categories Scheduled for MACT Standards in 2010

Gold Mines (Area) 

### 4.4000 2.46% 140.9 78.87%
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers (Major Sources) 

### 12.4800 6.99% 153.4 85.85% Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers (Area Sources that Burn Coal) 

### 7.6910 4.30% 161.1 90.16%


### Other Source Categories in Baseline Inventor y Blast Furnace & Steel Mills (Major) - Integ. Iron & Steel 

### 3.1000 1.74% 164.2 91.89% Sewage Sldge ncineration

u I nc i 

### 1 8000

. 1 01%

. 166 0

. 92 90%

. Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers (Area Sources that burn oil or biomass) 

### 0.6100 0.34% 166.6 93.24%

Remaining 28 source categories in the baseline inventory combined 

### 12.0750 6.76% 178.7 100.00%

Total 

### 178.7 100.00%
fym: Juan jfliLh £stmm

Mf: P$. /V/2'/y, Jfjufk ^wlAki^

fa <b /ethenMe eaAciJi^i this MddeJ /o/i7/zoit~ --JmUeJ^

/0fi/JS*.-4bfMc/fiw AC&xnleHq fopu*/my &'M Cirhftcai ahPA

GfN/t fl fy^e letter tinthlit AJ)j q&ce mxjtttk lOto— ^ch admifo/

jllk ihmchii is V01S, <^J 9totJ-fokfhct /* mJer /> finVfcJ-fflf

VKD! tdjy htfnt jhis &«riftdeJl? fk^c rededjf>ur Muljn *w

PAR Aeautsl#njMt M*n to /tot/nt /meddl Pebfol- - -ItShosflJ

/llguL wwtmtvt! Tttifimfffwwtk Ucc h£p°7

lift Skh flw& AdjA&u\JL{

/»* hpol $)tf\r\ /Vftmt l^rMt,

wlk&s 4f> tetanic is .

&M £s7e*o4 RECEIVED IN

/Mwfc W C0URT0FCWHIMALAPPEAL8

m;W\6i^ FEB 112015

\kb*UV*AS 7?3HS Absi,
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Mark
Garwood, Chief Executive Officer of Epic Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp for
  the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,                                 
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | the information contained in such Annual Report on
  Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of Epic Bancorp.

|                      |                                                                                      
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 25, 2008 | /s/ MARK GARWOOD                                                                     
|                      |                                                                                      
|                      | Mark Garwood, 
  Director and Chief Executive Officer
  (Principal Executive Officer)

---
Exhibit 99.2
    Statement Furnished by CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                       Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


                                       29
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

        STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Colin D. Anderson, is the Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of First Federal Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            C)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            D)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.



May 9, 2003                                            /s/ Colin D. Anderson
-------------                                          -------------------------
Dated                                                  Colin D. Anderson


                                       30
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.10c Segregated ballast tanks, crude oil washing systems, and dedicated clean ballast tanks for certain new and existing tankships of 20,000 to 40,000 DWT. ( a ) This section applies to each tankship of 20,000 DWT or more, but less then 40,000 DWT, except each one that— ( 1 ) Is constructed under a building contract awarded after June 1, 1979;
( 2 ) In the absence of a building contract, has the keel laid or is at a similar stage of construction after January 1, 1980;
( 3 ) Is delivered after June 1, 1982; or
( 4 ) Has undergone a major conversion, for which— ( i ) The contract is awarded after June 1, 1979; or
( ii ) Conversion is completed after June 1, 1982.
( b ) On January 1, 1986, or 15 years after the date it was delivered to the original owner or 15 years after the completion of a major conversion, whichever is later, a vessel under this section that carries crude oil must have— ( 1 ) Segregated ballast tanks that have a total capacity to allow the vessel to meet the draft and trim requirements in § 157.09(b); or
( 2 ) A crude oil washing system that meets the design, equipment, and installation requirements of §§ 157.122 through 157.138.
( c ) On January 1, 1986, or 15 years after the date it was delivered to the original owner or 15 years after the completion of a major conversion, whichever is later, a vessel under this section that carries product must have— ( 1 ) Segregated ballast tanks that have total capacity to allow the vessel to meet the draft and trim requirements in § 157.09(b); or
( 2 ) Dedicated clean ballast tanks that meet the design and equipment requirements under §§ 157.220, 157.222, and 157.224 and have total capacity to allow the vessel to meet the draft and trim requirements in § 157.09(b).
( d ) If the arrangement of tanks on a vessel under this section is such that, when using the tankage necessary to comply with the draft and trim requirements in § 157.09(b), the draft amidships exceeds the minimum required draft by more the 10 percent, or the arrangement results in the propeller being fully immersed by more than 10 percent of its diameter, alternative arrangements may be accepted provided— ( 1 ) At least 80 percent of the propeller diameter is immersed; and
( 2 ) The moulded draft amidships is at least 80 percent of that required under § 157.09(b)(1).
[CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11626, Mar. 22, 1985; 50 FR 12800, Apr. 1, 1985]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
      Lefevre, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              November 3,
              2006By:George
                Lefevre CEO
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.613 What are the requirements for a noise monitoring and hearing protection survey? ( a ) The deepwater port operator must measure noise and provide hearing protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95.
( b ) The initial noise survey for a deepwater port must be completed within one year of beginning operations.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1450

HAYWOOD ALLEN CANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LEWIS H. SWINDELL, IV, Individually and as a member of the law firm known as Everette and Hite, LLP; KIMBERLY A. SWANK, Authorized agent for Everette and Hite, LLP; HYMAN J. BRODY, Individually and in his official capacity as authorized agent for the entity known as Birdneck Point, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-204-7-F) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 21, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Haywood Allen Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Lewis H. Swindell, IV, Appellee Pro Se. Lewis Holmes Swindell, IV, EVERETT, WARREN, HARPER & SWINDELL, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Haywood A. Cannon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights action, denying his motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cannon v. Swindell , No. CA-03-204-7-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED