alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cloud v. Campbell.

Argued Thursday, March 3d, 1814.

i. Covenant — Verdict for More Damages than Claimed — Effect,*—In the action of covenant, a verdict for a larger sum than the damages laid In the declaration, or stated in the writ, must he set aside, and a new trial awarded. (1)

An action of covenant was instituted against John Cloud, in the superior court of law for the county of Frederick, by Iver Campbell, administrator of Elizabeth Campbell deceased, who was a devisee and legatee in the last will of John Campbell, upon a covenant executed by the defendant and the said John Campbell in his life time. The breach of covenant charged was the failing to pay certain rents, and the not keeping in repair the premises demised : The damages laid in the declaration and writ were five hundred dollars.

The defendant pleaded “covenants performed,” and “covenants not broken to which pleas the plaintiff replied generally. The jury found a verdict for 665 dollars 25 cents damages, with legal interest on 4'00 dollars, part thereof, from the 18th day of November 1788, until paid, and the like interest on 265 dollars 25 cents, the residue thereof, from the 11th day of August 1809, until paid ; for which, with costs, the superior court gave judgment; whereupon, a supersedeas was granted by this court, on a petition exhibited by the defendant.

Williams for the plaintiff in error.

George K. Taylor contra.

*Friday, March 11th, 1814,

*

See monographic *note*on “Covenant. The Action of” appended to Lee v. Cooke, 1 Wash. 306.

(1)

 Note. In Palmer *&*Eubank v. Mill, 3 H. & M. 503, it was decided that the writ might be referred to for the purpose of amendment. But in actions sounding in damages, the Jury cannot find more damages than are laid in the declaration and writ. The rule is otherwise in actions of debt upon bonds with collateral condition. See Payne v. Ellzey, 2 Wash. 143: Johnson v. Meriwether, 3 Call 523; Winslow and others v. the Commonwealth, 2 H. & M. 459.—Note in Original Edition.

the president pronounced the court’s opinion, “that the said judgment is erroneous in this,, that the verdict has been found, and judgment rendered thereon, for a larger sum than the damages laid in the declaration, or stated in the writ.”(2)

*88Judgment reversed, and a new trial awarded; “on which trial, the court, if required, is to instruct the jury that they are not to exceed in their verdict the amount of the damages laid in the declaration.”

(2)

 Note. A copy ot the writ was inserted in the transcript of the record. A i udgment by nihil dicit was first entered against the deiendant, and writ of enquiry awarded ; which was afterwards set aside, upon the defendant’s appearing and pleading. But oyer was not prayed of the writ. Yet it seems, that *88it would have been considered part of the record for the purpose of amendment, if the damages laid there in had been equal to, or had exceeded, the sum found by the jury. — Note in Original Edition.
#### Johnson *v.*The State.

Submitted December 17, 1906,

Decided January 15, 1907.

Petition for certiorari. Before Judge Mitchell. Tift superior court. October 3, 1906.

*G. G. Hall*and *B. D. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. E. Thomas, solicitor-general,*contra.

Beck, J.

An accusation against A, for the offense of assault and battery, charged that said defendant “did unlawfully and with force and arms assault and beat the person of one‘[B] with a pocket-knife.” The undisputed evidence showed that A tore B’s clothes and held him with his left hand, but did not strike him with a knife, nor attempt to sti’ike him with the knife, which was in his right hand. *Eeld,*that the evidence did not authorize a finding that the defendant was guilty of the offense of assault and *battery;*and the court erred in refusing to grant the writ of certiorari prayed for on this ground. *Fulford*v. *State,*50 *Ga.*591.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 520-521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Immigration and Naturalization Service
[INS No. 1971-99]


Announcement of District Advisory Council on Immigration Matters 
Eighth Meeting

AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service), has 
established a District Advisory Council on Immigration Matters (DACOIM) 
to provide the New York District Director of the Service with 
recommendations on ways to improve the response and reaction to 
customers in the local jurisdiction, and to develop new partnerships 
with local officials and community organizations to build and enhance a 
broader understanding of immigration policies and practices. The 
purpose of this notice is to announce the forthcoming meeting.

DATES AND TIMES: The eighth meeting of the DACOIM is scheduled for 
January 27, 2000, at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Jacob Javitts Federal 
Building, 26 Federal Plaza, Room 537, New York, New York 10278.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian A. Rodriguez, Designated 
Federal Officer, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 26 Federal 
Plaza, Room 14-100, New York, New York, 10278, telephone: (212) 264-
0736.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings will be held tri-annually on the 
fourth Thursday during the months of January, May, and September 2000.

Summary of Agenda

    The purpose of the meeting will be to conduct general business, 
review

[[Page 521]]

subcommittee reports and facilitate public participation. The DACOIM 
will be chaired by Charles Troy, Assistant District Director for 
Management, New York District, Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Public Participation

    The DACOIM meeting is open to the public, but advance notice of 
attendance is requested to ensure adequate seating. Persons planning to 
attend should notify the contact person at least two (2) days prior to 
the meeting. Members of the public may submit written statements for 
consideration by the DACOIM at any time before or after the meeting. 
Written statements should be sent to Christian A. Rodriguez, Designated 
Federal Officer, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 26 Federal 
Plaza, Room 14-100, New York, New York, 10278, telephone: (202) 264-
0736. Only written statements received by 5 p.m. on January 24, 2000, 
will be considered for presentation at the meeting. Minutes of the 
meeting will be available upon request.

    Dated: December 29, 1999.
Doris Meissner,
Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
[FR Doc. 00-139 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
§ 142.24 Use of equipment. ( a ) Each holder of a lease or permit issued under the Act shall ensure that all personnel who are required by this subpart to use or wear personal protective equipment do so when within the lease area or the area covered by the permit.
( b ) Persons responsible for actual operations shall ensure that all personnel engaged in the operation properly use or wear the personal protective equipment specified by this subpart.
§ 156.320 Maximum operating conditions. Unless otherwise specified, the maximum operating conditions in this section apply to tank vessels operating within the lightering zones designated in this subpart. ( a ) A tank vessel shall not attempt to moor alongside another vessel when either of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) The wind velocity is 56 km/hr (30 knots) or more; or
( 2 ) The wave height is 3 meters (10 feet) or more.
( b ) Cargo transfer operations shall cease and transfer hoses shall be drained when— ( 1 ) The wind velocity exceeds 82 km/hr (44 knots); or
( 2 ) Wave heights exceed 5 meters (16 feet).
#### Woods *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,

Decided December 11, 1906.

Indictment for burglary. Before Judge Wright. Chattooga superior court. September 29, 1906.

*G. D.*Rivers, for plaintiff in error.

Evans, J.

1. The defendant’s guilt of the crime of burglary was clearly established by the testimony of his accomplice, which was corroborated by aliunde evidence connecting the accused with the criminal act.

2. The judge did not abuse his discretion in denying a new trial because of the discovery, since the trial, of evidence solely of an impeaching character. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.813 Security Zones; Ports of Houston and Galveston, TX. ( a ) *Location.* Within the Ports of Houston and Galveston, Texas, moving security zones are established encompassing all waters within 500 yards of a cruise ship between Galveston Bay Approach Lighted Buoy “GB”, at approximate position 29°14′44′′ N., 094°32′41′′ W. [NAD 83] and up to, and including, Barbours Cut. These zones remain in effect during the inbound and outbound entire transit of the cruise ship and continues while the cruise ship is moored or anchored.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Entry of vessels or persons into these zones is prohibited unless authorized as follows. ( i ) Vessels may enter within 500 yards but not closer than 100 yards of a cruise ship provided they operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
( ii ) No person or vessel may enter within 100 yards of a cruise ship unless expressly authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston. Where the Houston Ship Channel narrows to 400 feet or less between Houston Ship Channel Entrance Lighted Bell Buoy “18”, light list nos. 23900/36055 at approximately 29°21′04′′ N., 094°47′00′′ W. [NAD 83] and Barbours Cut, the Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston may permit vessels that must transit the navigable channel between these points to enter within 100 yards of a cruise ship.
( iii ) Moored vessels or vessels anchored in a designated anchorage area are permitted to remain within 100 yards of a cruise ship while it is in transit.
( 2 ) Vessels requiring entry within 500 yards of a cruise ship that cannot slow to the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course must request express permission to proceed from the Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston, or his designated representative.
( 3 ) For the purpose of this section the term “cruise ship” is defined as a passenger vessel over 100 gross tons, carrying more than 12 passengers for hire, making a voyage lasting more than 24 hours, any part of which is on the high seas, and for which passengers are embarked or disembarked in the United States or its territories.
( 4 ) The Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston will inform the public of the moving security zones around cruise ships via Marine Safety Information Broadcasts.
( 5 ) To request permission as required by these regulations contact “Houston Traffic” via VHF Channels 11/12 or via phone at 281-464-4837.
( 6 ) All persons and vessels within the moving security zone shall comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston and designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
( c ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
[COTP Houston-Galveston-02-010, 67 FR 64048, Oct. 17, 2002, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38448, July 7, 2014; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44286, July 27, 2015]
Montana Department of Public Health 

& Human Services

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Goals

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for reducing falls and falls risk 

among older adults and adults with 

disabilities living in your community; and

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based falls 

prevention programs, while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

The Montana Department of Public Health & 

Human Services (DPHHS) and its partners 

will: 

• Expand Stepping On and implement 

SAIL into all 10 area agency on aging 

(AAA) regions.

• Evaluate project activities and 

disseminate results to local, state, 

and national audiences. 

• Develop and implement a unified 

outreach and marketing campaign.

• Engage with the Aging Services 

Bureau to identify and support 

affiliated AAA senior centers and 

partners as a primary source for 

implementing and sustaining the 

Stepping On and SAIL programs. 

Proposed Interventions

• Stepping On 

• Stay Independent and Active for Life 

(SAIL) 

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, Montana 

DPHHS will collaborate with the following 

key partners: 

• Montana Aging Services Bureau 

• Montana Area Agencies on Aging 

• Montana Area Agencies on Aging 

Association

• Montana Chronic Disease Prevention 

& Health Promotion Bureau

• Montana Disability and Health 

Program 

• Montana State University Extension 
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Anticipated Results 

The Montana DPHHS and its partners propose to 

achieve the following results: 

• Establish the 10 regional AAA as 

regionalized network hubs to implement 

and refer to community falls prevention 

programs.

• Embed Stepping on and SAIL classes into 

30 new sites statewide within all 10 

regional AAA, with a focus on current 

areas with no falls prevention programs.

• Engage 1,200 participants in Stepping On 

and SAIL, achieving an 80% retention 

rate.

• Upgrade the statewide program database 

to include additional falls prevention 

programs and have all sites utilize the 

database system.

• Increase older adults (60+) improvement 

in behavior and health status to prevent 

falls.

Contact:

Melissa Dale

Montana Department of Public Health & Human 

Services

melissa.dale@mt.gov

Heather Welch

Montana Department of Public Health & Human 

Services

hwelch@mt.gov

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATE

I, David M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 and all other reports containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year
covered by this annual report, of Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of
the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by
the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for
reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the transition property servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in
the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the transition property servicing agreement, that is included in these reports.

Date: November 5, 2008



/s/ David M. Davis(David M. Davis, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC)
# Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet

Kentucky Division for Air Quality



# -------------------------------------------

Appendix H.6

VISTAS SO2 Control Cost

Information for Century

Aluminum of Kentucky

# [This page intentionally left blank.]VISTAS SO2 Control Cost Information for Century Aluminum of Kentucky LLC*FIPSST FIPSCNTY State County Plant ID Point ID Point Description SIC SIC Description Source Measure Name21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 009 3 Ovens-Anode Baking Furnace 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum VISTAS 2018 Base Case21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 009 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum Primary Metals Industry Sulfuric Acid Plant21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 023 Roof Vents-Shielded Pot Rooms 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum VISTAS 2018 Base Case21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 024 Potlines 1-4 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum VISTAS 2018 Base Case21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 024 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum Primary Metals Industry Sulfuric Acid Plant21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 0P5 Potline 5 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum VISTAS 2018 Base Case21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 0P5 3334 Primary Production of Aluminum Primary Metals Industry Sulfuric Acid Plant*VISTAS used the USEPA's AirControlNet database, modified for the VISTASemission inventories, to determine the costs for incremental SO2 control measuresfor Non-EGUs.1VISTAS SO2 Control Cost Information for Century Aluminum of Kentucky LLC*FIPSST FIPSCNTY State County Plant ID Point ID21 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 00921 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 00921 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 02321 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 02421 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 02421 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 0P521 091 Kentucky Hancock Co 2109100004 0P5*VISTAS used the USEPA's AirControlNet database, modified for the VISTASemission inventories, to determine the costs for incremental SO2 control measuresfor Non-EGUs.2002 Base YearSO2 Emissions (TPY) SO2 Emissions (TPY) CE Tons Reduced CE Total Cost Cost Per Ton Marginal CPT459586000$0$0$04595860 410 70 $17,741,799 $43,281$43,281262335000$0$0$04,9856,366000$0$0$04,9856,3660 4,456 70 $63,302,217 $14,207$14,2071,3291,697000$0$0$01,3291,6970 1,188 70 $27,340,617 $23,020$23,0202018 Base CaseControl Strategy Application2
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.95 Safety. ( a ) Each device must— ( 1 ) Be free of design defects such as rough or sharp edges that may cause bodily injuries or that would allow toxic substances to escape to the interior of the vessel;
( 2 ) Be vented or provided with a means to prevent an explosion or over pressurization as a result of an accumulation of gases; and
( 3 ) Meet all other safety requirements of the regulations applicable to the type of vessel for which it is certified.
( b ) A chemical that is specified or provided by the manufacturer for use in the operation of a device and is defined as a hazardous material in 46 CFR Part 146 must be certified by the procedures in 46 CFR Part 147.
( c ) Current carrying components must be protected from accidental contact by personnel operating or routinely servicing the device. All current carrying components must as a minimum be of drip-proof construction or be enclosed within a drip-proof compartment.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	AUGUST 26, 2004

	______________________________

	NO. 07-04-0285-CV

	IN RE EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION, ET AL., RELATORS

	________________________________

	NO. 07-04-0286-CV

	IN RE CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION, ET AL., RELATORS

	__________________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	CONCURRING OPINION

	 The taxing units allege that the defendant companies engaged in a conspiracy and fraud to fix posted prices for oil.   However, because they did not seek relief under sections 15.05(c) and (h) and 15.21 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code Annotated, and without expressing any opinion whether these provisions may provide them a remedy, I concur in the decision of the majority opinion.

							Don H. Reavis

							      Justice	èå$Ü"åßÑt shall cause a hearing to be transcribed.  Should it be determined that appellant does want to continue the appeal and the court determines that present counsel should be replaced, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly- appointed counsel shall be provided to the Clerk of this Court.  Finally, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's record.  A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included in the appellate record.  Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Friday, August 18, 2006.

	It is so ordered.

		Per Curiam

Do not publish.
§ 161.13 VTS Special Area operating requirements. The following operating requirements apply within a VTS Special Area: ( a ) A VTS User shall, if towing astern, do so with as short a hawser as safety and good seamanship permits.
( b ) A VMRS User shall: ( 1 ) Not enter or get underway in the area without prior approval of the VTS;
( 2 ) Not enter a VTS Special Area if a hazardous vessel operating condition or circumstance exists;
( 3 ) Not meet, cross, or overtake any other VMRS User in the area without prior approval of the VTS; and
( 4 ) Before meeting, crossing, or overtaking any other VMRS User in the area, communicate on the designated vessel bridge-to-bridge radiotelephone frequency, intended navigation movements, and any other information necessary in order to make safe passing arrangements. This requirement does not relieve a vessel of any duty prescribed by the International Regulations for Prevention of Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) or the Inland Navigation Rules.