alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.915 How are safety zones, no anchoring areas, and areas to be avoided established and modified? ( a ) Safety zones are developed and designated during the application process for a deepwater port license, and may be established or modified through rulemaking. Rulemakings will afford prior public notice and comment, except when there is good cause not to do so, for example due to an imminent threat to the safety of life and property.
( b ) Before a safety zone, no anchoring area (NAA), or area to be avoided (ATBA) is established, all factors detrimental to safety are considered, including but not limited to: ( 1 ) The scope and degree of the risk or hazard involved;
( 2 ) Vessel traffic characteristics and trends, including traffic volume, the sizes and types of vessels involved, potential interference with the flow of commercial traffic, the presence of any unusual cargoes, and other similar factors;
( 3 ) Port and waterway configurations and variations in local conditions of geography, climate and other similar factors;
( 4 ) The need for granting exemptions for the installation and use of equipment or devices for use with vessel traffic services for certain classes of small vessels, such as self-propelled fishing vessels and recreational vessels;
( 5 ) The proximity of fishing grounds, oil and gas drilling and production operations, or other potential or actual conflicting activity;
( 6 ) Environmental factors;
( 7 ) Economic impact and effects;
( 8 ) Existing vessel traffic services; and
( 9 ) Local practices and customs, including voluntary arrangements and agreements within the maritime community.
( c ) The Executive Branch, acting through the Secretary of State and Commandant (CG-5P) proposes NAAs and ATBAs for deepwater ports to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) for approval. The ATBAs will be implemented after IMO approval is granted and announced in an IMO Circular, and after publication of a notice in the Federal Register.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39183, July 1, 2013]
#### Long Island Power Authority et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Shoreham-Wading River Central District et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Submitted July 29, 1996;

decided September 17, 1996

Motion for amendment of remittitur or, in the alternative, for reargument denied. *[See,*88 NY2d 503.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1999-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas (FEMA-1999-DR), dated July 1, 2011, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 15, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 1, 2011.

Fisher County for Public Assistance.

Kent and Moore Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], including direct Federal assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2011-21429 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/14

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 14 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
#### ALFRED A. KENDALL and another, Appellants, *v.*ROWLAND K. BRILL, Respondent.

Appeal, from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered on the report of a referee.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover of the defendant the sum of $146.47, for horse keeping, etc.

The defendant denied any indebtedness to the plaintiffs, and set up a counter-claim to the amount of $875, for the value of a horse and dog-cart alleged to have been sold by plaintiffs for defendant, which counter-claim was denied by the reply of the plaintiffs.

All the issues in the action were referred to E. H. Pomeroy, Esq., who, after duly hearing testimony, etc., on both sides, rendered his report, allowing the plaintiffs the full amount claimed by them, and also the full counter-claim of defendant, and ordering judgment for defendant, in the sum of $779.15.

The court, after a quite extended review of the evidence in the case, sustained the findings of the referee, without discussing any legal question.

*Samuel G.*Courtney, for the appellant.

*O. D. M. Baker,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
Debt.

*Case*29.

#### Woods, &c. *vs*Commonwealth, for Pennington’s Heirs.

Error to the Garrard Circuit.

*Debt on guardian’s bonds. Damages.*

Case stated.

In an action of debt on a guardian’s bond there can be no recovery beyond the penalty of the bond sued upon.

*December*23.

Judge Beeck

delivered the opinion of the Couit.

This was an action of debt in the name of the Commonwealth, for the use of Pennington’s heirs, upon a guardian’s bond, against the guardian and his surety, alledging as a breach of the condition the failure of the guardian to account for and pay over money which he had collected, belonging to his wards. The penalty of the bond is $600, and the damages laid in the declaration the same amount. The jury found for the plaintiff the debt in the declaration mentioned, to be discharged by the payment of '$812 03 in damages, and judgment having been rendered accordingly, the defendants have appealed to this Court.

■ Whether the penalty of the bond limited the extent of the plaintiff’s right to recover, is the only question which we deem necessary particularly to notice.

In an action of debt upon a penal bond, the plaintiff sues for the penalty, which he claims a right to recover by the failure of the defendant to perform the condition. The measure of his damages for the failure, he makes *113the penalty of the bond, and cannot, in our opinion, recover beyond it. If in this case then, the plaintiff is entitled, as the *maximum*to $600, it is absurd to say that *that*sum can only be discharged by the payment >of $812. We are aware of no authority and recognize no principle upon which the judgment can be sustained. The Court below, therefore, erred in not instructing the jury that they were not authorized to find exceeding $600 in damages. The judgment is also erroneous.

*Dunlap and Kincaid*for plain tiffs; *Turner and McKee*for defendants.

In regard to other objections made to the proceedings, it need only be remarked that they are not deemed available.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial without the payment of costs, unless the plaintiff shall release so much of the judgment as exceeds $600, with interest upon that amount from its rendition.
AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                    TO

                     PROCESSING AND MARKETING AGREEMENT


    THIS AMENDATORY AGREEMENT, made as of August 3, 1990 by and between
FREEPORT SULPHUR COMPANY, a division of Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners,
Limited Partnership ("Freeport") and FELMONT OIL CORPORATION ("Felmont").

                            W I T N E S S E T H:

    WHEREAS, under date of June 19, 1990, Freeport and Felmont entered into
that certain Processing and Marketing Agreement ("Agreement") covering
storage, filtration, blending, purification, vatting, melting, loading into
transportation equipment, marketing and associated transportation services to
be provided by Freeport with respect to sulphur produced for the account of
Felmont from the Main Pass Mine (as that term is defined in the Agreement),
and

    WHEREAS, Freeport and Felmont now desire to amend the Agreement in the
manner hereinafter set forth.

    NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between Freeport and Felmont
that the Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of August 3, 1990, in the
following respects:

         1.   Section 6.4 of the Agreement, such section being entitled
    "MARKETING FEE", shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

              "6.4 MARKETING FEE. For each ton of Felmont
              Tonnage determined to have been sold during a
              month, Felmont shall pay Freeport a Marketing Fee
              equal to 2.625% of the Average Sales Realization
              for such month.'"

         2.   Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and
    conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

<PAGE>


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Freeport and Felmont have caused this Amendment No. 1
to be executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year
first above written.

WITNESSES:                                    FELMONT OIL CORPORATION

/s/ Richard A. Holway                         By:  /s/ David Fagin
- --------------------------                    ------------------------

                                                   Title:    President
                                                        ----------------


                                              FREEPORT SULPHUR COMPANY,
                                              a division of FREEPORT-MCMORAN
                                              RESOURCE PARTNERS, LIMITED
                                              PARTNERSHIP

/s/ Paul S. Murphy                            By:  /s/ Robert Foster
- --------------------------                    ------------------------

                                                   Title:    President
                                                         ---------------


                                      2
§ 155.5015 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, this subpart applies to each self-propelled vessel that— ( 1 ) Carries oil of any kind as fuel for main propulsion;
( 2 ) Is not a tank vessel or is not certificated as a tank vessel;
( 3 ) Operates upon the navigable waters of the United States, as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(17a); and
( 4 ) Is 400 gross tons or more as measured under the convention measurement system in 46 U.S.C. 14302 or the regulatory measurement system of 46 U.S.C. 14502 for vessels not measured under 46 U.S.C. 14302.
( b ) This subpart also applies to vessels carrying oil as secondary cargo and that meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) For Integrated Tug Barge (ITB) units that are not certificated as tank vessels, the tonnage used to determine applicability of these regulations is the aggregate tonnage of the ITB combination, and the oil capacity used to determine the worst case discharge volume is the aggregate oil capacity of the ITB combination.
( d ) This subpart does not apply to the following types of vessels— ( 1 ) Public vessels;
( 2 ) Foreign-flag vessels engaged in innocent passage through the territorial sea or transit passage through a strait used for international navigation, unless bound for or departing from a port or place of the United States;
( 3 ) Vessels that carry oil as a primary cargo and are required to submit a vessel response plan (VRP) in accordance with 33 CFR part 155, subpart D;
( 4 ) Vessels constructed or operated in such a manner that no oil in any form can be carried onboard as fuel for propulsion or cargo;
( 5 ) Permanently moored craft; and
( 6 ) Inactive vessels.
Note to § 155.5015: VRP requirements for tank vessels are found in subpart D of this part.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Edward B. Cloues, II, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2005 ofK-Tron International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: October 31, 2005 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II  Edward B. Cloues, II  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### MILLIRON v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist, Athens Co

Decided October 6, 1930

Woolley & Rowland, Athens, and Edwin D. Ricketts, Logan, for Milliron.

R. D. Williams, Prosecuting Attorney, Athens, for State.

*691BLOSSER, J.

The trial court committed no error in refusing to require the state to elect upon which transaction it relied for a conviction because they were all parts of a single transaction.

As to the second alleged ground of error, that the court erred in defining possession and what constituted possession, there was no error in the general charge of the court in that respect. However, when the jury asked for further instructions the court told the jury that if the defendant threw the whiskey away to hide it or keep the officers from finding it then it was in his unlawful possession. This instruction was not correct and was an invasion of the province of the jury. The court should have said that if the defendant threw the whiskey away to hide it or keep the officers from finding it the jury from such evidence might infer that the defendant had the liquor in his unlawful possession. Such facts are evidence only of unlawful possession. But in view of the fact that the defendant admitted that he had temporary possession of the whiskey for the purpose of taking a drink of it and throwing the remainder away he in substance admitted his guilt and had no defense, and therefore the action of the court was not prejudicial.

Finding no prejudicial error in the record the judgment is affirmed.

Middleton, PJ, and Mauck, J, concur.
§ 127.1403 Inspections. ( a ) Each operator of a waterfront facility handling LHG must conduct a visual inspection for defects of each pressure relief device not capable of being tested.
( b ) The operator must conduct the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this section at least once each calendar year, with intervals between inspections not exceeding 15 months.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 537 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 537

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2008

 Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Specter, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. 
  Kohl) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of the peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in protecting the schools and 
        schoolchildren of the United States;
Whereas 181 peace officers across the United States were killed in the line of 
        duty during 2007, tragically the highest yearly total since 2001;
Whereas Congress should strongly support initiatives to reduce violent crime and 
        to increase the factors that contribute to the safety of law enforcement 
        officers, including--

    (1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests;

    (2) improved training; and

    (3) advanced emergency medical care;

Whereas, every 2 days on average, 1 out of every 16 peace officers is assaulted, 
        1 out of every 56 peace officers is injured, and 1 out of every 5,500 
        peace officers is killed in the line of duty somewhere in the United 
        States; and
Whereas, on May 15, 2008, more than 20,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, District of Columbia, to join with the families of their 
        recently fallen comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went 
        before them: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes May 15, 2008, as ``Peace Officers Memorial 
        Day'', in honor of the Federal, State, and local law 
        enforcement officers that have been killed or disabled in the 
        line of duty; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to observe 
        that day with appropriate ceremonies, appreciation, and 
        respect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 691 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 691

   Designating Thursday, November 20, 2008, as ``Feed America Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
 Brown, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Casey) submitted the following resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating Thursday, November 20, 2008, as ``Feed America Day''.

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless giving and an 
        appreciation for family and friends;
Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon which the Nation was 
        founded;
Whereas, according to the Department of Agriculture, roughly 35,000,000 people 
        in the United States, including 12,000,000 children, continue to live in 
        households that do not have an adequate supply of food; and
Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of thanksgiving, both 
        affirming and restoring fundamental principles in our society: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates Thursday, November 20, 2008, as ``Feed 
        America Day''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to sacrifice 
        2 meals on Feed America Day and to donate the money that they 
        would have spent on food to a religious or charitable 
        organization of their choice for the purpose of feeding the 
        hungry.
                                 <all>
```