alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Zambia

As of December 2017, FEWS NET has ended its presence in Zambia and is no longer preparing regular food security reports. Analysts outside Zambia will continue to monitor the food security situation and will draft special reports as needed to provide early warning or in-depth analysis of severe food insecurity.

Minimal acute food insecurity outcomes expected to continue

                              - Acute food insecurity remains Minimal (IPC Phase 1) following the above-average harvest this year, resulting in increased food availability for farming households and improved food access for households that dependent on market purchases. Poorer households will be accessing additional food or cash when hired for labor by better-off households during the peak period (Oct-Dec) for agricultural labor demand for the 2017/18 production season. Minimal (IPC Phase 1) area outcomes are likely to continue throughout the entire outlook period. 
                              - Since the arrival of harvest supplies on the market in June 2017, market activity has been lower than normal. Prices are at an all-time low due to the large harvest, large carryover stocks from the previous season, and limited regional markets for large traders. Maize prices are expected to remain below average and will peak at much low er levels than typical during the February and March 2018 period. 
                              - Even in the absence of the export ban, formal maize export volumes this season are much lower than in previous years. In contrast, informal exports to the Democratic Republic of the Congo are normal and demand for maize meal is higher than demand for grain due to the reduced meal prices. High demand from Tanzanian traders in the northern parts of the country has increased the flow of maize to deficit areas in the East Africa region. 

The Seasonal Calendar shows the annual and cyclical patterns of key food and income sources in a country throughout the typical year.

USGS-provided data and imagery supports FEWS NET's monitoring efforts of weather and climate throughout the world.
§ 147.871 Safety Zone, Constitution Spar, Outer Continental Shelf Facility, Green Canyon 680, Gulf of Mexico. ( a ) *Description.* The Constitution Spar is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Green Canyon Block 680. The facility is located at 27°17′31.92′′ N, 90°58′4.8′′ W, (NAD 83) and the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section except for the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel, as defined in 147.20
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative.
( c ) *Requests for Permission.* Persons or vessels requiring authorization to enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section must request permission from the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Commander or designated representative.
[88 FR 22914, Apr. 14, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.15 Slop tanks in tank vessels. ( a ) *Number.* A tank vessel must have the following number of slop tanks that comply with the requirements of this section: ( 1 ) A new vessel of less than 70,000 tons DWT and an existing vessel must have at least one slop tank.
( 2 ) A new vessel of 70,000 tons DWT or more must have at least two slop tanks.
( b ) *Capacity.* Slop tanks must have the total capacity to retain oily mixtures from cargo tank washings, oil residue, and ballast water containing an oily mixture of 3 percent or more of the oil carrying capacity. Two percent capacity is allowed if there are— ( 1 ) Segregated ballast tanks that meet the requirements in § 157.09, § 157.10, § 157.10a, or § 157.10b; or
( 2 ) No eductors arrangements that use water in addition to the washing water.
( c ) *Design.* A slop tank required in this section: ( 1 ) Must minimize turbulence, entrainment of oil, and the creation of an emulsion by the use of separate inlet and outlet connections; and
( 2 ) May carry bulk oil when not being used as a slop tank.
[CGD 74-32, 40 FR 48283, Oct. 14, 1975] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 157.15, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Main Street Trust,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Van A.
Dukeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Van A. Dukeman
-----------------------
Van A. Dukeman
Chief Executive Officer

March 21, 2003


                                       1
1

To:	Federal	Aviation	Administration Re:	Petition	for	Section	333	Exemption From: Joseph	Craft Sky Vista Productions 122 Cottonwood St NE Lonsdale, MN 55046 12/14 /15

**UAS: Manufacturer:**  Yuneec Electric Aviation 5555 Ontario Mills Parkway Ontario, CA 91764 **Model:** Yuneec Q5004K **Serial number** : YU15360292B04C01 **Battery** : 5400mAh 3S 11.1C L iPo **Maximum altitude** : 400ft above ground level **Maximum Descent Speed** : 2m/s **Maximum Flight Speed** 17mph2

**Product weights with battery and payload** : 60oz The drone features a No Fl y Zone monitoring s ys tem using built
- in GPS that ensures the drone does not operate in no fl y zones in compliance with FAA regulations **Radio Frequency** 2.4GHz **Video Transmission Range:** FCC Compliance up to 600m (1968.5ft) **Camera:** CG03 **Video Resolution:** UHD: 4K at 30FPS, 2.7k at 30FPS, 2.5k at 30FPS

– FULL HD: 1080p at 24/25/30/48/50/60/120FPS **Photo Resolution:** 12 Megapixels **Usage:** The primary

usage of the UAS Yuneec G50004k multi
- rotor drone will be for **residential and commercial real estate photography**  . The secondary usage of this unit will be for other **agricultural videography including land analysis** . The tertiary use of this unit will be for **miscellaneous recreational, non -**  **commercial use**
. **Flight Conditions:** The speed of the drone is to not exceed 17 mph as set by manufacturers specifications. The maximum altitude is 400ft above ground level. The drone is to not ever be flown out of the operators line
- of

- site, nor will it ever be flown above clouds and out of the line
- of
- site for the operator. **Area:** The area in which this UAS will be used is in the Southern Metro/Twin Cities area, primaril y in Lonsdale, MN. The UAS will never be used in restricted airspace in accordance to the most up
to - date FAA regulations. Altitude will remain in accordance to FAA regulations, and should3

never exceed 200ft in altitude. The UAS s ys tem, Yuneec G50004k comes equipped with a “Geo
- Fence” feature, which prevents the drone from ever going further than 300 feet away from the operator. The primary

characteristics of the u sage area are going to be farmland/rural. The only potential hazards for the area are farm buildings and/or trees if in the area. **Safety Procedures:** The drone will go through a strenuous pre
- flight inspection including checks to ensure all motors spin fre el y, the landing mechanism/feet are in operating condition, and that the remote control is fully operational and maintains proper communication to the aircraft. The props will be tightened and properly

secured before each flight. **Pre -**  **flight Safety Assessm ent:**  Pre
- flight procedures would mandate the drone be placed no less than 1,000ft from any structures, and 30ft from the operator. Pre
- flight safety assessment would ensure there are no people, or other hazards in the immediate area4
#### Commonwealth *vs*Branamon.

Presentment.

*Case*83.

Error to the Rockcastle Circuit.

*Tippling houses. Taverns. Retailing Spirits,*

The right to keep a tavern is a personal privilege ferabie^a1 tavern byffservMit or bar keeper, bat it must be under his control and

*June*6.

Judge Simpson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a presentment against the defendant for keeping a tippling house. On the trial the law and the facts having been by consent, submitted to the Judge, it was proved that one George Houke had obtained a license to keep a- tavern, that the defendant, Branamon, agreed with Houke to pay for the license, and for so doing he' was to have the right to sell spiritous liquors. Under this arrangement, therdefendant occupied a room in the tavern house of Houke, and for some time sold spiritons liqnors there by retail. He afterwards removed his liquors into an adjoining room, which he rented from a third person ; which room was no part of the premises in the possession of Houke or under his control, and continued to sell there by retail. The Court below dismissed the presentment.

The facts-proved constituted the defendant the keeper 0f a tippling house, unless the agreement between 110 , Houke and him, conferred upon him the legal right to sell spiritous liquors by retail. This right is given to the keeper of a tavern as incident to his business, is inseparable from it, and not transferable to a third per-J ........ , son. lie may exercise it by his barkeeper or servant, *375bat it must be under his control and superintendence, and form a part of the business of the house kept by Jjim. *

*Cates, Attorney General,*for Commonwealth; *Letcher*4* *Tilford*for defendant.

Meeeokd.

form a part of the business of the tavern which iieep.llCenSed

* , .... , , It does not appear m this instance, .that the occupation of the defendant in selling liquors by retail, had any connection whatever with the business of Houke as a tavern keeper; it seems to have been a separate and distinct concern, managed exclusively by the defendant, in his own name, and for his own benefit, and not for the accommodation of Houke’s guests, or in any manner under the control or direction of Houke. The license, therefore, to Houke to. keep a tavern, cannot operate asan authority .to the defendant, or shield him from the penalty to which he has subjected himself as the keeper of a tippling house..

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for a new trial and further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
#### § 801.51 Written notice of determination required.

Whenever the Administrator determines to assess a civil money penalty for a violation of the Act or this part, the person against whom such penalty is assessed shall be notified in writing of such determination. Such notice shall be served in person or by certified mail.
Amendment NO.1



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 (AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JUNE
1, 2012) 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Tyler Technologies, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and
Restated Effective June 1, 2012) (the “Plan”) is hereby adopted by Tyler Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of June 1, 2012. 
 WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Plan, subject to stockholder approval, on February 23, 2012, and the Company’s stockholders approved the Plan on May 10, 2012;

 WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 22 thereof; 

WHEREAS, the definition of “Compensation” in the Plan was modified from the original 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to
eliminate commissions, which would apply to participants under the Plan beginning with the next offering period that commences July 1, 2012, and the Board of Directors has determined that the modified definition is unnecessarily restrictive
based on the variety of regular pay plans among the Company’s employees and, therefore, does not treat the participants in the Plan fairly and equally; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the definition of “Compensation” with retroactive effect to the effective date of the Plan on June 1, 2012, which would apply to participants under
the Plan beginning with the next offering period that commences July 1, 2012; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Section 2.1(e) of the
Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 (e) “Compensation” means, with
respect to any Offering Period, regular base wages or salary, commissions, draws against commissions, travel pay and overtime paid during such Offering Period before deduction for any contributions to any plan maintained by a Participating Company
and described in Section 401(k) or Section 125 of the Code. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of
the foregoing Amendment No. 1, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed by a duly authorized officer on June 20, 2012, to be effective for all purposes as of June 1, 2012. 

 

			
	TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ H. LYNN MOORE, JR.
		 	 H. Lynn Moore, Jr.

Executive Vice President and General Counsel
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 81 6 . TOMMY LEE BULLARD v . EDW ARD PHI LBI N.

In 2 0 1 1

, a ju ry fo u n d T o m m y Lee Bu ll ard g u i l t y o f m a l i c e m urd er an d o t h er

o ffen s es , an d t h e Su p rem e Co u rt affi rm ed h i s ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct i o n o n ap p eal

. See

Bu l l a r d v. S t a t e , 29 9 Ga. 6 9 5 (7 9 1 SE2 d 8 0 8 ) (2 0 1 6 ). In 2 0 1 8

, B u l l ard fi l ed an

ap p li cat io n fo r a wri t o f h ab eas co rp u s , s eek i n g t o ch al len g e h is 2 0 11 co nv i ct i o n s an d

s en t en ces

. Th e t ri al co u rt den i ed Bu l l ard ’ s ap p li cat i o n , an d h e fi led t h i s di rect ap p eal

. W e l ack ju ri sd ict i o n

. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d ict i on o v er “ [a] l l h ab eas co rp u s cas es ”

an d “ [a] l l cas es i n wh i ch a s en t en ce of d eat h was i m p o s ed o r co u l d be im

p o s ed .” Ga.

Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4 ), (8 ). A p en al ty o f d eat h m ay b e i m p o s ed

fo r t he cri m e o f m al i ce m u rd er. See OCGA § 1 6 -5 -1 (a), (e) (1 ). Co ns eq u en t l y , t h i s

ap p eal is h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co urt fo r d is po s i ti o n

. See Nea l

v. S t a t e , 2 9 0 Ga. 5 6 3

, 57 2 (7 2 2 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 12 ) (Hu n st ei n , C. J

., co n cu rri n g ); s ee

al s o S t a te v. Th o r n t o n , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4

, 5 2 4 (1 ) (3 22 SE2 d 7 1 1 ) (1 9 8 4 ) (d i rect i n g t h i s

Co u rt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n wh i ch ei t h er a s en t en ce o f d eat h o r o f l ife i m p ri s o n m en t

h as b een i m

p o s ed u p o n co n v i ct i o n o f m u rd er”), o v erru l ed i n p art o n o t h er g ro u nd s

as reco g n i zed i n El l i o t t v. S t a t e , 3 0 5 Ga. 1 7 9

, 2 05 (III) (C) (i ) (8 2 4 SE2 d 2 6 5) (2 0 1 9 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 30, 2019

04/30/2019
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II
    
    RONALD R. REMICKEdward B. Cloues, II
    
    Ronald R. RemickChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate: May 12, 2009
    
    Date: May 12, 2009
§ 147.827 Marlin Tension Leg Platform safety zone. ( a ) *Description.* The Marlin Tension Leg Platform (Marlin TLP), Viasca Knoll, Block 915 (VK 915), is located at position 29°6′27.46′′ N, 87°56′37.14′′ W. The area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel;
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[CGD08-02-045, 68 FR 55445, Sept. 26, 2003]
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Michael Levinsohn, Chief Executive Officer of Lenco Mobile Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that:




1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Lenco Mobile Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b) [Reserved.]




c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: May 28, 2010




/s/    MICHAEL LEVINSOHNMichael Levinsohn, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 158.133 Which ports and terminals must provide reception facilities? ( a ) A port or terminal which receives oceangoing tankers, or any other oceangoing ship of 400 gross tons or more, carrying oily mixtures, must have a reception facility which meets subpart B of this part.
( b ) A port or terminal which receives oceangoing ships carrying NLSs must have a reception facility which meets subpart C of this part.
( c ) All ports and terminals under the jurisdiction of the United States, including commercial fishing facilities, mineral and oil shorebases, and recreational boating facilities, must have a reception facility which meets subpart D of this part.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18408, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55574, Nov. 2, 2001]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Main Street Trust,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
B. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/  David B. White
-----------------------------------
David B. White
Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2006
<PAGE>
		    Annual Statement of Compliance


February 20, 2004

Subject: 1999-CB5, C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates

To Whom It May Concern:

The undersigned Officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the
Annual Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement for the above referenced security and certifies
that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during such
preceding fiscal year (or such shorter period in the case of the
first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been
made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under this Agreement for 2003.



Litton Loan Servicing LP

/s/ Janice McClure
------------------
Janice McClure
Senior Vice President
February 20, 2004

/s/ Ann Kelley
--------------
Ann Kelley
Secretary
February 20, 2004