alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 654 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 654

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of the Honorable 
 Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Member of the House of Representatives for the 
                  11th Congressional District of Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 2008

  Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. Hatch) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of the Honorable 
 Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Member of the House of Representatives for the 
                  11th Congressional District of Ohio.

Whereas Stephanie Tubbs Jones was born on September 10, 1949, in Cleveland, 
        Ohio, and attended Case Western Reserve University and the Franklin 
        Thomas Backus School of Law;
Whereas, in 1982, at the age of 33, Stephanie Tubbs Jones was elected to serve 
        on the Cleveland Municipal Court;
Whereas, in 1983, Stephanie Tubbs Jones became the first African-American woman 
        to serve on the Court of Common Pleas in the State of Ohio;
Whereas Stephanie Tubbs Jones served as the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor from 1991 
        through 1999, becoming the first woman and the first African-American to 
        hold the position;
Whereas, in 1998, Stephanie Tubbs Jones was elected to the first of 5 terms in 
        the House of Representatives, where she was a tireless advocate for the 
        citizens of Ohio's 11th Congressional District and championed increased 
        access to health care, improved voting rights, and quality education for 
        all;
Whereas Stephanie Tubbs Jones was the first African-American woman to represent 
        the State of Ohio in Congress; and
Whereas Ohio has lost a beloved daughter and the House of Representatives one of 
        its strongest voices with the passing of Stephanie Tubbs Jones on August 
        20, 2008: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) mourns the loss of the Honorable Stephanie Tubbs Jones 
        and expresses its condolences to her family and friends and to 
        the people of the 11th Congressional District of Ohio; and
            (2) honors the life of Stephanie Tubbs Jones, a highly 
        esteemed and accomplished Member of Congress, dedicated 
        community leader, and tireless advocate for those in need.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7544

ROSCOE GOINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-608-5-H) Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roscoe Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Ra leigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Roscoe Goins seeks to appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the State on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Goins has not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Metropolitan Community Health Services, Inc.

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year CapacityBuilding grant are to:

• Goal 1: Develop capacity in areas with no 

or limited evidence-based program 

infrastructure to introduce, deliver, and 

expand the reach (program participants 

and completers) of evidence-based 

chronic disease self-management 

education and self-management support 

programs within underserved geographic 

areas and/or populations to improve their 

confidence in managing their chronic 

condition(s). 

• Goal 2: Develop a business plan with 

strategies to support the proposed 

programs during and beyond the grant 

period.

The Metropolitan Community Health Services, 

Inc. (MCHS) and its partners will: 

• Increase access to CDSMP, CPSMP, and 

SBIRT programs;

• Implement sustainable funding 

arrangements; and

• Embed the programs into a prevention 

program network via a Network Hub 

Model.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program (CDSMP)

• Chronic Pain Self-Management Program

(CPSMP)

• Screening, Brief Intervention, and 

Referral to Treatment Program (SBIRT)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, MCHS will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Albemarle Area Agency on Aging

• Beaufort County Department of Social 

Services

• Beaufort County Health Department

• Beaufort County Manager

• Metropolitan African Methodist 

Episcopal Zion Church

• Mid-East Commission Area Agency on 

Aging

• North Carolina Center for Health & 

Wellness at the University of North 

Carolina Asheville

• North Carolina Division of Aging and 

Adult Services
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

Anticipated Results

MCHS and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Engage 800 older adults and older adults 

with disabilities in CDSMP, CPSMP, 

and/or SBIRT programs;

• Achieve a participant completion rate of 

70%;

• Reduce the number of emergency room 

visits, hospitalizations, and expenditures 

related to chronic disease or pain;

• Decrease substance use disorders related 

to chronic disease or pain; and

• Develop a business plan that supports the 

program(s) beyond the grant funding 

period.

Contact:

Mariana Rolinksy

Metropolitan Community Health Services, Inc.

mrolinsky@agapechc.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
§ 154.2112 Vapors with potential to polymerize or freeze—Special requirements. ( a ) A vapor control system (VCS) that controls vapors with the potential to polymerize at a normal ambient condition must— ( 1 ) Be designed to prevent condensation of monomer vapor. Methods such as heat tracing and insulation are permitted if they do not result in an increased risk of polymerization;
( 2 ) Be designed so that polymerization can be detected. Any points suspected of being sites for potential polymerization buildup must be equipped with inspection openings; and
( 3 ) Include devices to measure the pressure drop across detonation arresters due to polymerization. The devices should activate an alarm on high pressure drop to warm of polymerization. Any device used for this purpose, including differential pressure monitors, must not have the capability of transmitting a detonation across the detonation arrester.
( b ) A VCS that controls cargo vapors that potentially freeze at ambient temperature must have a design that prevents the freezing of vapors or condensate at ambient temperature or that detects and removes the liquid condensate and solids to prevent accumulation.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.911 Security Zones; Captain of the Port Eastern Great Lakes Zone. ( a ) *Location.* The following are security zones: ( 1 ) *Nine Mile Point and Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plants.* The navigable waters of Lake Ontario bounded by the following coordinates: commencing at 43°30.8′ N, 076°25.7′ W; then north to 43°31.2′ N, 076°25.7′ W; then east-northeast to 43°31.6′ N, 076°24.9′ W; then east to 43°31.8′ N, 076°23.2′ W; then south to 43°31.5′ N, 076°23.2′ W; and then following the shoreline back to the point of origin (NAD 83).
( 2 ) *Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.* The waters of Lake Ontario bounded by the following area, starting at 43°16.9′ N, 077°18.9′ W; then north to 43°17.3′ N, 077°18.9′ W; then east to 43°17.3′ N, 077°18.3′ W; then south to 43°16.7′ N, 077°18.3′ W; then following the shoreline back to starting point (NAD 83).
( 3 ) *Moses-Saunders Power Dam.* The waters of the St. Lawrence River bounded by the following area, starting at 45°00.73′ N, 074°47.85′ W; southeast following the international border to 45°00.25′ N, 074°47.56′ W; then southwest to 45°00.16′ N, 074°47.76′ W; then east to the shoreline at 45°00.16′ N, 074°47.93′ W; then northwest to 45°00.36′ N, 074°48.16′ W; then northeast back to the starting point (NAD 83).
( 4 ) *Long Sault Spillway Dam.* The waters of the St. Lawrence River bounded by the following area, starting at 44°59.5′ N, 074°52.0′ W; north to 45°00.0′ N, 074°52.0′ W; east to 45°00.0′ N, 074°51.6′ W, then south to 44°59.5′ N, 074°51.6′ W; then west back to the starting point (NAD 83).
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with § 165.33, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Eastern Great Lakes.
( 2 ) Persons or vessels desiring to transit the area of the Nine Mile Point and Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plants or Ginna Nuclear Power Plant security zones must contact the Captain of Port Eastern Great Lakes at telephone number (716) 843-9570, or on VHF/FM channel 16 to seek permission to transit the area. Persons desiring to transit the area of Moses-Saunders Power Dam or Long Sault Spillway Dam security zones must contact the Supervisor, Marine Safety Detachment Massena at telephone number (315) 769-5483, or on VHF/FM channel 16 to seek permission to transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
( c ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70051, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
[CGD09-02-005, 67 FR 53500, Aug. 16, 2002, as amended by USCG-2010-0821, 75 FR 61100, Oct. 4, 2010; 88 FR 87930, Dec. 20, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 635 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 635

       Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2008

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following be the minority membership on the 
following committee for the remainder of the 110th Congress, or until 
their successors are appointed:
    Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation: Mrs. Hutchison, 
Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Smith, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Sununu, 
Mr. DeMint, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Wicker.
                                 <all>
```
Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program (LTCOP) 

Challenges

Program Overview

The LTCOP identifies and resolves complaints made by, or on behalf of, residents of nursing facilities and board & care 

facilities*. In 2017, the Ombudsman program advocated on behalf of over 3 million residents in 16,376 nursing 

facilities and 58,031 board & care facilities. The program received 201,460 complaints and Ombudsmen resolved or 

partially resolved 73.5% of claims at a satisfactory level. 

Most Challenging Complaints

In nursing facilities, the most 

challenging complaints to resolve 

are: 

Staffing-related 

In board & care facilities, the most 

challenging complaints to resolve 

are: 

Admission, 

transfer, discharge,

and eviction 

Most Time Consuming 

Complaints

In nursing facilities, the most 

time consuming complaints to 

resolve are: 

Care-related

In board & care facilities, the 

most time consuming complaints 

to resolve are: 

Admission, 

transfer, discharge, 

and eviction 

Most Effective Complaints to 

Resolve

In both nursing facilities and 

board & care facilities, 

Ombudsmen are most effective 

at resolving complaints related 

to:

Autonomy, choice, 

preference, exercise of rights 

and privacy 

LTC Ombudsmen Reported that Fewer Specialized Services are Available for: 

Residents with mental illness Residents who live in rural areas 

Residents who 

speak a language 

other than English 

Resource Challenges 

State and Local Ombudsmen both reported the following as key 

resource limitations: 

Insufficient funding 

Difficulty recruiting and supporting volunteers 

Lack of resources prevent the program from achieving regular 

nursing facility and board & care facility visits, and performing 

complaint investigations. 

Example Complaints Received by 

Ombudsmen 

“I’ve been waiting for someone to answer 

my call light for the last hour.”

“No one knocks before they enter my 

room. They don’t understand this is my 

home too.”

“I found my dad with bed sores the last 

two times I visited.”

“I just got a discharge notice but don’t 

know how to appeal it.”

*Board & care facilities include assisted living and similar residential settings. The data in this factsheet come from the Handling

Resident Complaints Research Brief available at ACL.GOV. To access more data from the National Ombudsman Reporting Systems

(NORS) visit https://agid.acl.gov/CustomTables/NORS/Year/. For more information on NORS visit

https://acl.gov/programs/protecting-rights-and-preventing-abuse/long-term-care-ombudsman-program. [Version September 2020]
----

----

----

----

----

----

|                    | Very truly yours,   |
|-------------------------|---------------------|
|                    |                |
|                    | THE LGL GROUP, INC. |
|                    |                |
|                    |                |
|                    |                |
|                    | By:                 |   |
|                    |                | Name:  Gregory P. AndersonTitle:  Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                    |                |   |
|                    |                |   |
| AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED: |                |   |
|                    |                |   |
|                    |                |   |
|                    |                |   |
|                    |                |   |
| [_________________]     |                |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.100 What are the requirements for inspecting deepwater ports?

Under the direction of the Sector Commander, or to the MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority, marine inspectors may inspect deepwater ports to determine whether the requirements of this subchapter are met. A marine inspector may conduct an inspection, with or without advance notice, at any time the Sector Commander or MSU Commander deems necessary.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39182, July 1, 2013]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Westgate Acquisitions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **Geoff Williams**, Chief Executive Officer Principal Accounting            Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEOFFWILLIAMS** |
|-----|-------------------|

 

**Geoff Williams**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

March 25, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-119853 on Form S-8 of our report relating to the financial statements of
Celebrate Express, Inc. dated July 14, 2004 (October 15, 2004, as to the effects
of the reverse stock split described in Note 2), appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Celebrate Express, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2006.

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington
August 25, 2006
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Steven Roth, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofAlexander’s, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   May 6, 2004     /s/ Steven Roth    Steven Roth
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Tron International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald R.
Remick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





August 12, 2002                           /s/ Ronald R. Remick
                                          --------------------
                                          Ronald R. Remick
                                          Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                          Officer and Treasurer