alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER98-2770-006 (Consolidated with Docket Nos. EC98-40-000 and ER98-2786-000)]

Take notice that on May 22, 2000, American Electric Power Service Corporation, on behalf of the operating companies of the American Electric Power System, and Central and South West Services, Inc., on behalf of the operating companies of Central and South West Corporation, submitted a compliance filing containing substitute versions of the System Integration Agreement, the System Transmission Integration Agreement, and the Transmission Reassignment Tariff accepted for filing by the Commission in Docket No. ER98-2770-000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14125 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 825.313 Failure to provide certification. ( a ) *Foreseeable leave.* In the case of foreseeable leave, if an employee fails to provide certification in a timely manner as required by § 825.305, then an employer may deny FMLA coverage until the required certification is provided. For example, if an employee has 15 days to provide a certification and does not provide the certification for 45 days without sufficient reason for the delay, the employer can deny FMLA protections for the 30-day period following the expiration of the 15-day time period, if the employee takes leave during such period.
( b ) *Unforeseeable leave.* In the case of unforeseeable leave, an employer may deny FMLA coverage for the requested leave if the employee fails to provide a certification within 15 calendar days from receipt of the request for certification unless not practicable due to extenuating circumstances. For example, in the case of a medical emergency, it may not be practicable for an employee to provide the required certification within 15 calendar days. Absent such extenuating circumstances, if the employee fails to timely return the certification, the employer can deny FMLA protections for the leave following the expiration of the 15-day time period until a sufficient certification is provided. If the employee never produces the certification, the leave is not FMLA leave.
( c ) *Recertification.* An employee must provide recertification within the time requested by the employer (which must allow at least 15 calendar days after the request) or as soon as practicable under the particular facts and circumstances. If an employee fails to provide a recertification within a reasonable time under the particular facts and circumstances, then the employer may deny continuation of the FMLA leave protections until the employee produces a sufficient recertification. If the employee never produces the recertification, the leave is not FMLA leave. Recertification does not apply to leave taken for a qualifying exigency or to care for a covered servicemember.
( d ) *Fitness-for-duty certification.* When requested by the employer pursuant to a uniformly applied policy for similarly-situated employees, the employee must provide medical certification, at the time the employee seeks reinstatement at the end of FMLA leave taken for the employee's serious health condition, that the employee is fit for duty and able to return to work (*see* § 825.312(a)) if the employer has provided the required notice (*see* § 825.300(e)); the employer may delay restoration until the certification is provided. Unless the employee provides either a fitness-for-duty certification or a new medical certification for a serious health condition at the time FMLA leave is concluded, the employee may be terminated. *See also* § 825.213(a)(3).
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.930 What datum is used for the geographic coordinates in this subpart?

The geographic coordinates used in this subpart have been revised to enable plotting using the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) and no longer require the use of any further conversion factors for correction.

[USCG-2007-27887, 72 FR 45903, Aug. 16, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          34,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    448,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,516,352
<PP&E>                                         937,661
<DEPRECIATION>                               (493,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,070,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,571,684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,713,407
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,070,488
<SALES>                                      1,319,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,319,402
<CGS>                                        (737,147)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (737,147)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (8,552,741)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (167,407)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,137,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,137,893)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,137,893)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Kit M. Cole or Mark Garwood, and either of them as attorney-in-fact to sign in
his or her behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of San Rafael Bancorp and all amendments and/or supplements to this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

|Signature                             |  | Title                                                                                      |  | Date          
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|                                      |  |                                                                                            |  |               
|/s/KIT M. COLEKit M. Cole             |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |  | March 29, 2004
|/s/CAROLYN HORANCarolyn Horan         |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2004
|/s/RICHARD E. SMITHRichard E. Smith   |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2004
|/s/W. JEFFERY TAPPANW. Jeffery Tappan |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2004
|/s/MICHAEL MOULTONMichael Moulton     |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)                                      |  | March 29, 2004

---

QuickLinks
plff_ex41.htm


EXHIBIT 4.1







M&K CPAS, PLLC


Houston, TX







                                                    


July 5, 2012







Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.W.


Washington, DC 20549-7561







Dear Sirs/Madams:







We have read Item 4.01 of Orpheum Property, Inc. (the “Company”) Form 8-K/A dated July 5, 2012, and are in agreement with the statements relating only to M & K CPAS, PLLC contained therein. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the Company contained therein.







Very truly yours,


 


 


/s/ M & K CPAS, PLLC
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
August 31, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00344

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF R.A.E., ET AL, CHILDREN ,

From the 37th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA01868 Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an appeal of an order terminating parental rights as to three children. The clerk’s record, which was filed on August 30, 2 021, contains an order of termination that is styled as an “interlocutory” order. The order terminates appellant’s parental rights to his two children and terminates the mother’s rights to all three children. However, the order grants the “not ready”
annou ncement by the father of the third child and does not terminate his parental rights. Accordingly, the order is not a final judgment that disposes of all parties and all claims. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The clerk’s recor d does not contain a severance order that would make the otherwise interlocutory order against appellant final for the purposes of appeal. See In re T.T.F. , 331 S.W.3d 461, 477 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2010, no pet.) (“A severance splits a single suit into tw o or more independent actions, each action resulting in an appealable final judgment.”); see also In re T.J.H. , No. 13

- 06

- 00407

- CV, 2009 WL 2624114, at *3 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg Aug. 26, 2009, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (holding order terminating parental rights of one parent was interlocutory until trial court signed a second order terminating the other parent’s rights); D.R. v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs. , 281 S.W.3d 598, 601

– 02 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2008, no pet.) (applying Lehmann ’s d efinition of “final judgment” to the calculation of appellate deadlines in a parental termination appeal). “[A]n appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment.” Ne. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). Because no final or der has been entered in the underlying case, we ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by Sep tember 20, 2021 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided

— for example, by obtaining an order severing the termination of appellant’s parental rights from the other parties and claims at issue in this suit and filing that severance order in a supplemental clerk’s record

— the appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to establish this court’ s jurisdiction, appellant must ask the trial court clerk to prepare one and must notify the clerk of this court thatsuch a request was made. All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the

court.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of August, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
FAA Home
Regulations & Policies
Advisory Circulars (ACs)

# AC 150/5380-6B - Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5380-6B
- Title
- Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements
- Date cancelled
- 2014-10-10
- Cancellation notes
- 150/5380-6B
- Date issued
- 2007-09-28
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Engineering Division 
- Description
-  	Provides guidelines and procedures for maintaining rigid and flexible airport pavements.	Because of the size of this document, it is available as one large file (see Complete) or as several smaller files (see Parts 1-3). 
- Content
-    -  150/5380-6B (Complete)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5380-6B (Part 1)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5380-6B (Part 2)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5380-6B (Part 3)  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current ACs
      - Cancelled ACs
      - Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs

## Export All

      - Current ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled ACs  (CSV)

## Contact Information

      - Advisory Circulars Administrator
      - Other Points of Contact  (MS Excel)
§ 143.101 Means of escape. ( a ) “Primary means of escape” shall be fixed stairways or fixed ladders of metal construction.
( b ) “Secondary means of escape” shall be types approved for “primary means of escape” or portable, flexible ladders, knotted man ropes, and other devices satisfactory to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( c ) Manned OCS facilities shall be provided with at least two “primary means of escape” extending from the uppermost platform level that contains living quarters or that personnel occupy continuously, to each successively lower working level and to the water surface. Working levels without living quarters, shops, or offices in manned facility structural appendages, extensions, and installations that personnel occupy only occasionally shall be provided with one “primary means of escape” and, when necessary in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, one or more “secondary means of escape.”
( d ) Unmanned OCS facilities shall be provided with at least one “primary means of escape” extending from the uppermost platform working level to each successively lower working level and to the water surface. When personnel are on board, unmanned facilities shall also be provided with one or more “secondary means of escape,” but not more than one will be required for every 10 persons extending from the uppermost working level of the facility to each successively lower working level and to the water surface, excluding facility appendages and installations, unless “secondary means of escape” from such appendages and installations are necessary in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( e ) “Means of escape” shall be suitably accessible to personnel for rapid facility evacuation.
( f ) When two or more “means of escape” are installed, at least two shall be located as nearly diagonally opposite each other as practicable unless such requirement is unreasonable or impracticable in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
pennsylvania 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

SECRETARY 

February 20, 2013 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

RECEIVBD 

EPA, [',EGlON !II 

(I:TiCB orrmmow.L ADhtcrJ~J~mu:t·o t• 

RECEIVED 

FEB 2 5 2013 

Division Director (3APOO) 

On June 25, 2012, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) submitted for approval a 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision pertaining to amendments to the Allegheny County 

Health Department (ACHD) Rules and Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution Control, relating 

to its Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) regulations. The revision is identified as 

revision 66 for the ACHD's internal tracking. 

The DEP is hereby modifying its request for approval of the ACHD NSR regulations as a SIP 

revision by redacting the deletion of language at the end of subsection (f) of the regulation. The 

SIP revision incorporating Article XXI§ 2102.06(£) should read as follows by restoring the 

italicized text: 

f. Requirements for Modeling. Where air quality models are used to meet the 

provisions of this Section, modeling shall be based on the applicable models and other 

requirements specified in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W (Guideline on Air Quality 

Models). Where an air quality model is inappropriate, the model may be modified or 

another model may be substituted only on a case-by-case basis at the Department's 

discretion upon written approval by the Administrator of EPA. In addition, use of a 

modified or substituted model must be subject to notice and opportunity for public 

comment under procedures set forth in 40 CFR 51.102. 

We look forward to your expeditious action on this SIP revision. Should you have any questions 

or need additional information, please contact Dean E. Van Orden, Assistant Director of Air 

Quality, by e-mail at dvanorden@pa.gov or by telephone at 717.787.9702. You may also contact 

James E. Thompson, Manager, ACHD Air Quality Program, by e-mail atjthompson@achd.net 

or by telephone at 412.578.8103 . 

Secretary 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 1 P.O. Box 2063 1 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

717.787.2814 t5J_ Printed on Recycled Paper (.6¢) www.depweb.state.pa.us 
,Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

cc: Joyce Epps 

James Thompson, ACHD 

Diana Esher, EPA Region III 

- 2-
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report of Innofone.com,
Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Alex Lightman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

      (1)   The Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and


      (2)   The information contained in the Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report
            fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
            and result of operations of the Registrant.



Date: February 2, 2006                By:  /s/ Alex Lightman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alex Lightman
                                           Chief Executive Officer, President
                                           and Principal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                      *****


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit


32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George R. Lefevre,
      CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              August 20, 2007
            By:
            /s/ George R. LefevreGeorge
              R. Lefevre CEO
§ 143.120 Floating OCS facilities. ( a ) Before construction is started on a proposed floating OCS facility, the owner or operator of the facility must submit to the Coast Guard for approval all plans and information listed in subpart C of 46 CFR part 107 which relate to the facility. All plans and information must be submitted according to the procedures in that subpart.
( b ) The facility must comply with the requirements of subchapters F (Marine Engineering) and J (Electrical Engineering) of 46 CFR chapter I and 46 CFR part 108 (Design and Equipment). Where unusual design or equipment needs make compliance impracticable, alternative proposals that provide an equivalent level of safety may be accepted. These requirements do not apply to production systems on the facility.
( c ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, determines whether a floating OCS facility meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section and issues a certificate of inspection for each facility which meets these requirements. Inspection of the facility may be required as part of this determination.
( d ) Each floating OCS facility that is constructed after April 2, 2018 must comply with the requirements of 46 CFR subpart 111.108 prior to engaging in OCS activities.
[CGD 78-160, 47 FR 9382, Mar. 4, 1982, as amended by USCG-2012-0850, 80 FR 16990, Mar. 31, 2015]