alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14138]



[[Page 35912]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2559-000]


Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of Filing

May 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Duke Energy Corporation (Duke), 
tendered for filing a Service Agreement with Public Service Company of 
Colorado for Non-Transmission Service under Duke's Open Access 
Transmission Tariff.
    Duke requests that the proposed Service Agreement be permitted to 
become effective on May 12, 2000.
    Duke states that this filing is in accordance with Part 35 of the 
Commission's Regulations and a copy has been served on the North 
Carolina Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14138 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
From: Mariana Lopez mariana62@gmail.com

Subject: Fwd: 1099 Mariana Lopez

Date: March 6, 2023 at 6:57 PM

To: Bridget Obando bridget@fairlawattorney.com

Enviado desde mi iPhone

Inicio del mensaje reenviado:

De: Jennifer Manjarres <jmanjarres@avantassurance.com>

Fecha: 6 de marzo de 2023, 5:48:42 p.m. EST

Para: Mariana Lopez <mariana62@gmail.com>

Asunto: Re: 1099 Mariana Lopez

Buenas tardes Mariana, 

Por medio de este correo electrónico, le informo que sus formularios de impuesto 1099 fueron enviados por correo (US

Postal) y nuestra oficina de abogados también los enviará a la oficina de su abogado esta semana. 

Gracias, 

Jennifer A. Manjarres

Executive Office Manager

O: (305) 686-5561, Ext, 102

C: (786) 775-1133

E: jmanjarres@avantassurance.com

W: https://obamacareinsurancecenter.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the

intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and

destroy all copies of the original message. Neither Avant Assurance Inc, nor any of its agents or employees

are responsible for the content, including viruses placed by third parties or other harmful components. This

email does not contain legal, tax, or medical advice.  If any confidential information is contained herein,

including personal health information, you agree to maintain the confidentiality of any such information. All

rights, privileges, and immunities apply.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:44 PM Mariana Lopez <mariana62@gmail.com> wrote:

Buenas tardes.

Te estoy escribiendo porque no he recibido mi 1099 del 2022 y la estoy necesitando para mis taxes, 

En espera de tu respuesta.

Mariana Lopez 

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 54-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 153.303 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart apply to any owner or operator of a vessel or onshore or offshore facility from which a discharge of oil into coastal waters occurs who acts to remove or arranges for the removal of such discharges.
function fusionCalcColumnEqualHeights(){var n=".fusion-fullwidth:not(.fusion-equal-height-columns)",u=".fusion-fullwidth.fusion-equal-height-columns";jQuery(".fusion-fullwidth.fusion-equal-height-columns .fusion-builder-row-inner").each(function(){jQuery(this).find(".fusion-layout-column > .fusion-column-wrapper").not(function(n,u){return jQuery(u).parent(".fusion-column-wrapper").length||jQuery(u).parents(".fusion-events-shortcode").length?1:0}).equalHeights()}),jQuery(".fusion-fullwidth.fusion-equal-height-columns").each(function(){jQuery(this).find(".fusion-layout-column:not(.fusion-builder-row-inner .fusion-layout-column) > .fusion-column-wrapper").not(function(n,u){return jQuery(u).parentsUntil(".fusion-content-tb",".fusion-column-wrapper").length?1:0}).equalHeights()}),jQuery(n+" .fusion-recent-posts "+u+", "+n+" .fusion-posts-container "+u+", "+n+" .fusion-portfolio "+u).each(function(){jQuery(this).find(".fusion-layout-column .fusion-column-wrapper").not(function(n,u){return jQuery(u).parent(".fusion-column-wrapper").length?1:0}).equalHeights()})}jQuery(window).on("load",function(){setTimeout(function(){fusionCalcColumnEqualHeights()},100),jQuery(window).on("fusion-resize-horizontal fusion-live-editor-updated",function(){setTimeout(function(){fusionCalcColumnEqualHeights()},500)})}),jQuery(window).on("fusion-dynamic-content-render",function(n,u){var o=jQuery(u).find(".fusion-fullwidth.fusion-equal-height-columns");0<o.length&&o.each(function(){jQuery(this).find(".fusion-layout-column .fusion-column-wrapper").equalHeights()})});
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1926](/current/title-29/part-1926?toc=1)

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At [44 FR 8577](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-8577), Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at [44 FR 20940](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-20940), Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of [29 CFR part 1926](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1926) together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in [29 CFR part 1910](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/part-1910), which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at [84 FR 21597](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-21597), May 14, 2019.

#### § 1926.1086 Mixed-gas diving.

Note:

The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at [§ 1910.426 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-19/title-29/section-1910.426).

[[61 FR 31432](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-31432), June 20, 1996]
#### § 167.10 Operating rules.

The operator of a vessel in a TSS shall comply with Rule 10 of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, as amended.
#### Bullard *v.*The State.

Argued December 18, 1906.

Decided January 15, 1907.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Gober. Cobb superior court. October 22, 1906.

*F. H. Clay*and *J. J. Northcutt,*for plaintiff in error.

*John C. Hart, attorney-general,*and *B. F. Simpson, solicitor-general,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where a father was on trial for the murder of his daughter, and no attack had been made on the character of the daughter for chastity, there was no error in excluding evidence that a physician made an examination of the body of the deceased and found ¡her to be a virgin.

2. Where evidence had been introduced as to the physical and mental condition of the accused a.t the time of the homicide, there was no error in refusing to allow a physician to be asked his opinion as to how long the accused would probably live.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7302

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KORD JOHNSON, a/k/a John P. Jones, a/k/a Kent

J. Coppage, a/k/a Morris Maslia,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-96-113, CA-97-908)

Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: February 18, 1999

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kord Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kord Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-96-

113, CA-97-908 (E.D. Va. July 30, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-297-000]

                    Take notice that on May 23, 2000, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT) filed a refund report allocating to MRT's former firm sales customers an Account No. 858 refund amount MRT received from CMS Trunkline Gas Co. and Trunkline LNG Co., related the sale of these companies to an unaffiliated entity, CMS, and further related to the settlement in Docket Nos. RP87-15-036, RP92-122,                     *et al.*

MRT states that pursuant to 16.2 of the General Terms and Conditions of MRT's Tariff and based on established Account No. 191 and 858 allocations to its former jurisdictional sales customers, MRT is allocating to each customer its pro-rata share of the $174,657 refund.

MRT states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to each of MRT's customers and to the state commissions of Arkansas, Illinois and Missouri.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 1, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13777  Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1418 Safety Zone; Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, GU. ( a ) *Location.* The following area, within the U.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia/Sector Guam Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-15), all navigable waters within a 100-yard radius of race participants in Cocos Lagoon, Merizo, Guam. Race participants, chase boats, and organizers of the event will be exempt from the safety zone.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, “designated on-scene representative” means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a Federal, State, and local officer either designated by or assisting the COTP U.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia/Sector Guam in the enforcement of the safety zone.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in section § 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated on-scene representative.
( 2 ) This safety zone is closed to all persons and vessel traffic, except as may be permitted by the COTP or a designated on-scene representative.
( 3 ) Persons and Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety zone must contact the COTP or a designated on-scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The COTP or a designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at telephone number (671) 355-4821. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP or a designated on-scene representative.
( d ) *Enforcement period.* This safety zone will be enforced on the Sunday before Memorial Day from 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. annually, unless the event is delayed or cancelled due to weather. The Coast Guard will provide advance notice of enforcement and a broadcast notice to mariners to inform the public of the specific date of the event.
[USCG-2020-0460, 86 FR 31622, June 15, 2021, as amended by USCG-2022-0429, 87 FR 48446, Aug. 9, 2022]
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, James H. Morgan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James H.
      MorganJames H. MorganChief Executive Officer


Date: April 15, 2010




This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy
Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




---
§ 160.111 Special orders applying to vessel operations. Each District Commander or Captain of the Port may order a vessel to operate or anchor in the manner directed when: ( a ) The District Commander or Captain of the Port has reasonable cause to believe that the vessel is not in compliance with any regulation, law or treaty;
( b ) The District Commander or Captain of the Port determines that the vessel does not satisfy the conditions for vessel operation and cargo transfers specified in § 160.113; or
( c ) The District Commander or Captain of the Port has determined that such order is justified in the interest of safety by reason of weather, visibility, sea conditions, temporary port congestion, other temporary hazardous circumstances, or the condition of the vessel.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50902

MICHAEL PINEDO , Plaintiff

− Appellant ,

v ersus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Connally Unit , Defendant

− Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 5:18

- CV

- 577

Before SMITH, COSTA, and HO , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Michael Pinedo , Texas prisoner #2055727, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis ( “ IFP ” ) on appeal of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous, for failure to state a claim, because the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity and immun ity under the Eleventh Amendment,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 27 , 2019 Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 18

- 50902

2 and in the alternative, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. By moving to proceed IFP, Pinedo is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197,
20 2 (5th Cir. 1997) . Our inquiry into Pined o ’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous) .” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quota

tion marks and citation omitted).

Pinedo fails to address any of the district court’s conclusions and, other

wise, makes only conclusional statements in support of his argument that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. Pro se brief s are afforded
liberal construction. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Nevertheless, when an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if he had not appealed. Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty . Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Because Pinedo has failed to challenge any factual or legal aspect of the district court’s disposition of the claims raised in his complaint or the certif i ca
tion that his appeal is not taken in good faith, he has abandoned the critical issue of his appeal. See id

. Thus, the appeal lacks arguable merit. See How

ard , 707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, the IFP motion is DENIED. Additionally, because this appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Baugh , 117 F.3d
at 202 n.24. The district cour t’s dismissal of Pinedo ’ s complaint and our dis

mis sal of this appeal count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba
v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387

- 88 (5th Cir. 1996). Pinedo is CA UTIONED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is detained or incar cerated in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury

.
Crisis Negotiation

1

Det. Jeff Thompson, Ph.D.

Hostage Negotiator | Researcher
ME

•NYPD Detective

•Hostage Negotiator

•Trainer

•Researcher

•Mediator

•Masters Negotiation

•PhD Conflict Resolution
NYPD Hostage Negotiation Team

• “Talk to me”

• Active Listening

• Empathy

• Respect

• Calm 

• Patience

• Adaptability

• Guide

• Prepared

• Confidence

• Self-awareness

• Voice tone

• Influence

• Calm

• Rapport
Crisis situations are known for

•Stress

•Anxiety

•Tense

•Unpredictable

•Lack of Information

•Emotionally driven
HISTORY OF NYPD HNT

• Created in 1973

• Result of 4 prior incidents in 2 years

• Attica Prison Riots (September 1971)

•Dog Day Afternoon (August 1972)

•Hostage Situation at Munich Olympics (September 

1972)

•John and Al’s Sporting Goods Robbery (January 

1973)
History of NYPD HNT

•4 incidents

•58 people killed in total

•12 were law enforcement
The NYPD HNT was first ever 

organized HNT in the world.
Team Breakdown

• 1 Lieutenant

• Just over 100 Negotiators

• Lieutenants

• Sergeants

• Detectives

• Respond when activated
Situation Types

•Hostage(s)

•Barricaded Perpetrator

•Barricaded EDT

•Suicidal EDT
Team Set-Up

•Primary Negotiator

•Coach 

•Scribe

•Intel Gatherer

•Supervisor
No content – placeholder slide for discussion
Crisis Situations

UNIQUE
What is a crisis?

•A condition of instability or 

danger

•A dramatic emotional 

upheaval
emotions

rational thought

Actions are guided by:
Our Role

“We all need to be good listeners and learn to 

demonstrate our empathy and understanding of the 

problems, needs, and issues of others. 

Only then can we hope to influence their behavior in a 

positive way.”

Gary Noesner, Chief Negotiator, FBI (ret.)
Crisis and Conflict Communication

What is the GOAL?
Crisis and Conflict Communication

Influence a behavioral change to get 

VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE.
Crisis and Conflict Communication

Emotional CONTAGION
What are skills?

•Active Listening

•Time

•De-escalate

•Empathy and Rapport

•Influence

•Control
LENS Model
This is Important!

80/20

Rule
Active Listening

Affective Effective
Non-verbal Communication

Situational Awareness

•Eye Contact

•Voice

•Gestures

•Posture
Active Listening Skills

•Open-ended questions

•Emotional Labels

•Paraphrase

•Reflect/Mirror

•Silence
Open-ended questions

•What happened next?

•Tell me more.

•Then what happened?
Emotional Label

• Angry

• Upset

• Sad

• Frustrated

• Pissed off

• Hopeless

• Enraged

*don’t ask
Paraphrase

Give the gist of what was said, 

include the emotional label.
Reflect/Mirror

• “...nothing has worked.”

• “...that’s all.”

• “...I am so upset.”
Active Listening Skills

SILENCE
Crisis and Conflict Communication

What is the GOAL?
Crisis and Conflict Communication

Influence behavioral change to get 

VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE.
Be Genuine
What are skills?

• Active listening

• Time

• De-escalates

• Empathy and Rapport

• Influence

• Control
There is no finish line.
35
Thank You

Questions?

Mediator.jeff@gmail.com

• Crisisnegotiator.blogspot.com

• @NonverbalPhD

• MediatorJeff@gmail.com