alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
R7W

R6W R5W R4W
1
; T MAP 3
2 - Cottage g
Map oi” by Grove Roseburg District
Area S R
Ray esource Management Plan
Pa Roseburg =" Pave Ae 4. ; 8
District \ a 2008
ZA | South River and Swiftwater Resource Areas
OREGON 1 1 Land Tenure Zone 3 Locations
R8W s . and
Visual Resource Management Classes
@—
1
| Legend
1
Drain .
| 149 Land Tenure Zone 3 Visual Resource
T T
% 68 2 Identifier Management Area
' See Appendix F ma Class 3
Elkton |
| Land Tenure Zone 3 Class 4
Yonealla — ar .
| Location
Up,
Lo,
+
3 138 | S Raw R2W R1W R1E
Ss |
[_-____LANE COUNTY TT |
4 DOUGLAS COUNTY H
|
EUGENE DISTRICT t
ROSEBURG DISTRICT
. ,
i |
| t
T q 24
24 1 | °
° |
155 |
152 1
[ee 4
156
A\a
Oakland
Platt 1 +
Reservoir
T 25
25 O Sutherlin Ss
\
Cooper Creek
Reservoir
a5?
A158 es
T Omang T
26 q %
Ss
ia)
ial |)
Ele 149
a e Roseburg R1W R1E
Zz
T al> T
27 ro) LL 27
s ote Ss mmodiied for Western Oregon Flan Fevatone analysis,
ROW SWIFTWATER RESOURCE AREA
T SOUTH RIVER RESOURCE AREA
1c
ae
318
lo
T 8|8 4 T
08 1 ‘Winston 28
Ss Ss
153
154 150
@)
y
ST qT aa
1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Tt Got I I { I [ I I i I ]
T 29 Miles
8 8 1° 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ELF 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 ]
; Myrtle Kilometers
§ Creek Albers Equal Area Projection
s North American Datum of 1983
¢ ot T2928
151
WY =-
wy R1W R1E
; 60 Riddle\ >> , 0
30 s
Ss
Cc ill
creek anyonville
Ce
i
4
cha)
2 | ro :
at —-4 S
S | S
\ r _
ROSEBURG DISTRICT TT ee ee
ROW MEDFORD DISTRICT x L
of
H
T | a
$ [ S
cow ___polictas County iy =
JAGKSON COUNTY
va [ -—' 227)
R8W R7W R6W R5W R4w R3W R2W R1W R1E M08-09-03
CHAPTER SUMMARY

Uniform Resource Support Request Tool

*Please return the completed request form to*ConsultNCLER@acl.hhs.gov.

This tool is designed to help Model Approaches states request training and resource support to enhance their legal/elder rights advocacy on the most critical legal issues affecting older persons with the greatest social and economic needs.

Uniform Resource Support Request Tool

# Basic Information

Name: 

Organization: 

Title:   

State:                                                                     E-mail: 

Are you a Legal Assistance Developer (LAD)?            Yes                 No

If you are not a LAD, are you in coordination with your state’s LAD?            Yes                 No  

# Needs and Goals of Training/Resource Support

Briefly describe your training/resource needs, explain the impact the training/resource support will have on older adults and/or legal services in your state, and how you will measure and report on anticipated impact:

# Anticipated Subject Matter

NCLER Trainers have expertise in the core priority issues detailed in the Older Americans Act and in issues critically important to protecting the needs of the most economically and socially vulnerable older adults.  Please indicate both the substantive and legal service delivery areas the training should cover:

Substantive Area of Law:

Economic Security

Health Care and Long-Term Services and Supports

Elder Abuse

Advanced Care Planning

Supported Decision-Making

Guardianship (i.e. representing an older adult)

Consumer Protection

Housing

Other

Uniform Resource Support Request Tool   2

Within the above categories, what sub-issues should be covered in the training?

Legal Services Development Area of Focus:

Assessing Legal Needs of Older Persons

Assessing the Capacity of the Legal Delivery System to Meet Critical Needs

Priority Setting, Targeting, and Outreach

Data Collection/Reporting on Legal Services

Development of Statewide Standards for Delivery of Legal Assistance

Low Cost Components: Helplines and Pro-Bono

Supported Decision-Making Partnerships in Elder Justice

# Logistical Information for On-Site Requests

*This part is for preliminary planning purposes.*

1. When and where would you like this training to occur?

NCLER will provide:

*1-2 national expert trainers;**Trainer travel expenses; and**Training materials.*

Your agency(ies) will need to provide and commit to the following: Space for the training, recruit and register participants, audio-visual equipment (as necessary), CLE or continuing education credit as needed by participants.

Please return the completed form to ConsultNCLER@acl.hhs.gov. Thank you!

Uniform Resource Support Request Tool   3

# image1.png
# B-3 NF Numb sorted
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q FOR
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                        74
<INVENTORY>                                      6,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,846
<PP&E>                                           3,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,987
<BONDS>                                          3,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           719
<OTHER-SE>                                         724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    135
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                135
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In Connection with the Annual Report of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas J. Leech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Douglas J. Leech
--------------------------

Douglas J. Leech
Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2003
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David J. DeLuca., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Troy
Financial Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operations of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.


Date:  August 21, 2003

By:  /s/ David J. DeLuca
     ----------------------
      David J. DeLuca
      Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Argued and submitted February 14,

remanded for recalculation of child support; otherwise affirmed October 21, 1992

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Richard G. HIRSCHT, *Appellant, and*Judith L. HIRSCHT, *Respondent.*

(90-DO-0222-ST; CA A70326)

840 P2d 98

Judith F. Stiegler, Bend, argued the cause and submitted the brief for appellant.

Terrence B. O’Sullivan, Bend, argued the cause and submitted the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

DURHAM, J.

*726DURHAM, J.

Father appeals from a dissolution judgment that awarded him custody of the parties’ minor child. Only one of his assignments of error requires discussion.

Father argues that the trial court erred when it calculated the child support obligation imposed on mother. OAR 137-50-390 provides:

> “The amount of any pre-existing or concurrently entered court ordered spousal support shall be deducted from the gross income of the parent obligated to pay such spousal support and shall be included in determining the adjusted gross income of the parent entitled to receive such spousal support.”

The trial court neither deducted father’s spousal support from his income nor included the spousal support in mother’s income. He claims that her child support obligation must be recalculated in accordance with the rule.

Mother claims that the amount of child support was stipulated and that father never argued in the trial court that his stipulation was contingent on an adjustment of the parties’ incomes for the award of spousal support.

Father is correct. The parties did not stipulate to the child support obligation. Father’s child support computation worksheet, stating the presumed child support payable by mother as $212.76, was admitted as an exhibit without objection. Mother’s counsel stated that he agreed “that the $212.76 amount calculated as child support is the correct amount, *absence*[sic] *spousal*support.” (Emphasis supplied.) Father’s calculation did not adjust the figure for spousal support, because that was not determined until the court entered judgment. He adequately preserved his claim that the child support obligation should be adjusted for any award of spousal support.1

*727Remanded for recalculation of child support; otherwise affirmed. Costs to father.

1

 Husband argued in the trial court:

> “The parties do not dispute the determination of the amount of child support contained in Exhibit #1. Respondent should be ordered to pay the sum of $212.00 per month to Petitioner as a contribution to the support of the minor child in Petitioner’s custody. *It would be appropriate to offset this award by any amount ordered that Petitioner pay to Respondent as and for spousal support,"*(Emphasis supplied.)
#### § 118.25 Application procedure.

Approval of lights and other signals required shall be obtained, prior to construction, from the District Commander of the area in which the structure will be situated. Application shall be by letter accompanied by duplicate sets of drawings showing (a) plan and elevation of the structure showing lights and signals proposed, and (b) small scale vicinity chart showing proposed bridge and all other bridges within 1,000 feet above or below the proposed bridge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,493,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,353,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   407,000
<INVENTORY>                                 35,718,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,352,000
<PP&E>                                      85,965,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,141,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,954,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,324,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,865,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 103,667,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,954,000
<SALES>                                     83,603,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,603,000
<CGS>                                       54,905,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,548,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,249,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,571,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,300,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,271,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,271,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22


</TABLE>
§ 156.130 Connection. ( a ) Each person who makes a connection for transfer operations shall: ( 1 ) Use suitable material in joints and couplings to ensure a leak-free seal;
( 2 ) Use a bolt in at least every other hole, and in no case less than four bolts, in each temporary bolted connection that uses a flange that meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard flange requirements under § 154.500(d)(2) of this chapter;
( 3 ) Use a bolt in each hole in each temporary bolted connection that uses a flange other than one that meets ANSI standards;
( 4 ) Use a bolt in each hole of each permanently connected flange;
( 5 ) Use bolts of the correct size in each bolted connection; and
( 6 ) Tighten each bolt and nut uniformly to distribute the load and sufficiently to ensure a leak free seal.
( b ) A person who makes a connection for transfer operations must not use any bolt that shows signs of strain or is elongated or deteriorated.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may use a connection for transfer operations unless it is: ( 1 ) A bolted or full threaded connection; or
( 2 ) A quick-connect coupling acceptable to the Commandant.
( d ) No person may transfer oil or hazardous material to a vessel that has a fill pipe for which containment cannot practically be provided unless an automatic back pressure shutoff nozzle is used.
[CGD 75-124, 45 FR 7177, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36256, Sept. 4, 1990]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, September 13, 2011, 9 a.m. to September 13, 2011, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 10, 2011, 76 FR 49493.                

This notice is amended to add the National Cancer Advisory Board Ad hoc Subcommittee on Global Cancer Research meeting. The meeting will convene on September 12, 2011 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. in the Diplomat/Ambassador room at the Bethesda Regency Hyatt, One Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.

Dated: August 12, 2011.

Anna P. Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-21137 Filed 8-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
ACL Developmental Disabilities Protection and Advocacy (PADD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2017 Estimated Allocation

4/14/2016

State/Territory Protection and Advocacy (P&A)

Alabama $576,550

Alaska $384,693

Arizona $682,029

Arkansas $392,066

California $3,381,181

Colorado $460,889

Connecticut $384,693

Delaware $384,693

District of Columbia $384,693

Florida $1,908,313

Georgia $1,032,201

Hawaii $384,693

Idaho $384,693

Illinois $1,227,726

Indiana $706,263

Iowa $384,693

Kansas $384,693

Kentucky $530,427

Louisiana $537,001

Maine $384,693

Maryland $483,558

Massachusetts $604,186

Michigan $1,126,902

Minnesota $497,404

Mississippi $409,186

Missouri $643,318

Montana $384,693

Nebraska $384,693

Nevada $384,693

New Hampshire $384,693

New Jersey $755,331

New Mexico $384,693

New York $1,791,166

North Carolina $1,056,954

North Dakota $384,693

Ohio $1,233,073

Oklahoma $394,436

Oregon $406,375

Pennsylvania $1,277,644

Rhode Island $384,693

South Carolina $546,890

South Dakota $384,693

Tennessee $709,132

Texas $2,408,334

Utah $384,693

Vermont $384,693

Virginia $723,631

Washington $624,897

West Virginia $384,693

Wisconsin $591,746

Wyoming $384,693

American Samoa $205,808

Guam $205,808

Northern Mariana Islands $205,808

Puerto Rico $745,578

Virgin Islands $205,808

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $205,808

TOTAL $37,571,980

FY 2017: 75 percent old formula and 25 percent new formula. Disclaimer: Once Congress enacts an 

appropriation for FY 2017 and after ACL has updated the data used in the formula for determining 

award amounts, the allotments will be adjusted accordingly. The final State allotments will be provided 

to the grantee after a final appropriations bill is passed by Congress.