alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                14,088
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        326,579
<ALLOWANCES>                           9,990
<INVENTORY>                           38,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     412,373
<PP&E>                             1,990,131
<DEPRECIATION>                     1,014,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,425,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                303,969
<BONDS>                              250,289
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              50,784
<OTHER-SE>                           681,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,425,065
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,283,412
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,111,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     9,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      161,627
<INCOME-TAX>                          62,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   99,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          99,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           1.98<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.94<F2>
<FN>
<F1>EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC 
<F2>EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED 
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### § 183.202 Flotation and certification requirements.

Each boat to which this subpart applies must be manufactured, constructed, or assembled to pass the stability and flotation tests prescribed in §§ 183.225(a), 183.230(a), and 183.235(a).
§ 161.15 Purpose and intent. ( a ) A Vessel Movement Reporting System (VMRS) is a system used to monitor and track vessel movements within a VTS or VMRS area. This is accomplished by requiring that vessels provide information under established procedures as set forth in this part, or as directed by the Center.
( b ) To avoid imposing an undue reporting burden or unduly congesting radiotelephone frequencies, reports shall be limited to information which is essential to achieve the objectives of the VMRS. These reports are consolidated into three reports (sailing plan, position, and final).
[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36324, July 15, 1994, as amended by USCG-2003-14757, 68 FR 39366, July 1, 2003; USCG-2011-0257, 76 FR 31838, June 2, 2011]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40043 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
OSCAR RODRIGUEZ

- ALBIR, also known as Oscar Rodriguez

- Elvir , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11

- CR

- 222

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Oscar Rodriguez

- Albir appeals the district court’s reimposition of a $100 special assessment after the court revoked his supervised release. A review of the revocation hearing transcript re veals that the district court made no findings as to whether Rod riguez

- Albir satisfied the special assessment imposed at his original sentencing and did not orally reimpo se the special assessment. Thus, as the Government concedes, there is a conflict between the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 14, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40043 Document: 00513154984 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2015No. 15

- 40043

2 oral pronouncement and the written judgment, and the ora l pronouncement controls

. See United States v. Martinez , 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, w e VACATE IN PART and REMAND for the district court to
delete the reimposition of the $100 special assessment from the written judgment

. See 28 U.S. C. § 2106. Case: 15-40043 Document: 00513154984 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (00-067)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Flight Advisory Committee. 

# DATES:

Wednesday, June 28, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 11:30 a.m.; on Thursday, June 29, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m.; and on Friday, June 30, 2000 from 8 a.m. until 2 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, SW, Room MIC 7, Washington, DC 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Stacey Edgington, Code ML, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-4519. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

—Shuttle upgrades review. 

—Overview, status and metrics for Office of Space Flight programs. 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: June 2, 2000.

Matthew Crouch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-14374 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-U
1 Subject: RE: Public Hearing

From: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 7:38 PM To: ejefferson@kc.rr.com ; Garrett.Pamela@epamail.epa.gov ; Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov Cc: Reeves, David Subject: Re: Public Hearing

Ms. Jefferson, Pam Garrett is the contact person to notify to reques t a public hearing; I have forwarded your request to her and to others. We will address your questions on Monday when I'm back in the office.

Thanks,

Susan Fairchild Environmental Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency direct line: 919.541.5167 fax: 919.541-3207 email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Overnight mail address: US EPA Mail Code D243-04 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709

-----"Elnora" < ejefferson@kc.rr.com > wrote: -----

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Elnora" < ejefferson@kc.rr.com > Date: 12/02/2011 02:22PM Subject: Public Hearing



## Ms. Fairchild,

I am writing to you today to ask for your guidance in th e matter of requesting and holding a public hearing regarding the EPA’s new rule as it relates to CR+6 emissions from insulation manufacturing plants. I understand that you are my point of contact for making the request and that it must be submitted to you eith er in wiring or verbally by close of business on Monday, Dec. 5. Please confirm. I also unders tand that once requested, that the hearing must be held by Monday, December 12. Please confirm. Then, will you direct me to references regarding the public’s responsibilities in ca lling this meeting, possible outcomes and expectations. Please also include the EPA’s responsibilities once it has received the request for the public meeting anad in your response, please include a list of persons that the names and titles of the persons whom the EP A will ask to attend.2 

## Finally, feel free to make any suggestions that would yield the highest level of relevant and meaningful information so that the community of people who attend the public meeting will have a full and complete understa nding of the issues, the solutions and the possible outcomes-- thank you--

Elnora Tellis Jefferson, president, Oak Grove Neighborhood Association, Inc.

913-371-2858
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 529 

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Greater 

Philadelphia Association of Realtors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2008 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the founding of 

the Greater Philadelphia Association of Realtors. 

Whereas the Greater Philadelphia Association of Realtors, 

which was 1 of the 3 original chapters of the National 

Association of Realtors, was founded January 10, 1908, 

in the City of Philadelphia; 

Whereas the Greater Philadelphia Association of Realtors has 

worked to improve the neighborhoods, business communities, and real estate markets in the City of Philadelphia 

and its suburbs; and 

Whereas the members of the Greater Philadelphia Association 

of Realtors continue to do excellent work in strengthening the economy of the United States and making the 

American dream of homeownership a reality: Now, therefore, be it 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 529 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate commemorates the 100th 

2 Anniversary of the founding of the Greater Philadelphia 

3 Association of Realtors. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement (No. 000-30495) on Form S-8 of First OttawaBancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 2004 relating to theconsolidated financial statements of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended, which reportis incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First OttawaBancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

** **
| **BKD,****LLP**        |
|------------------------|
|                   |
| /s/  BKD, LLP          |   |
|                   |
| Indianapolis,  Indiana |
| March 29,  2004        |

 

----
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                         AERO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aero Systems
Engineering, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003, I,
Charles H. Loux, President and CEO, of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

3.   This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and

4.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: April 29, 2003                              /s/ Charles H. Loux
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Charles H. Loux, President and CEO
                                             Aero Systems Engineering, Inc.
**OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS AUSTIN** 

. ‘ I”::. Honorabla W. il. &%conneU, President North Texas StateTeaohereCol.h&e

The Wf or 0 **lneer8** under the 8uomtary 2 War, 16 authuriead taln and operete

publiopark &nil **itira in**  **reeanotr amae**  **undslr**

Departaent, and to pexa%t t8nfmo8,

and operation

vi Seoretary

of siaer is authorieod **to grant**  **leaaa1 ’** **ef** land&i, ino1udl.q

**8tructureu or**  tacilltles

thereon,

in rensrvair

areas for @aohand llwi68s may be gxtmted without AoA8tary

eond68r8tiOA, t0 **SUOh fl@WMi~O**  **tOr t&8**  **UM Of**  **alWar** suitable

I*r piablio

park0sod roomatfoxmlpurpowo, when ths &,soretery

OS Zar desma auoh aotionto be In the publiolntcnat.~

T&a M.lo*fng oon8titutlwml and 8ktutory **previri4lu** 81.e **e~jdi~8ble** t0 YOUIT c;wUdOA:,.i .-

EWorablo **W.** J. XofWnndl, pa&a 3

ni iirt~8 or h&018 7 **0r** th0 wm8 Oorutitutiw, mupra,thr 8ohool8y8tuais a matterof mat8 MM .wd 8tpr- ,: rialon and the *arlow rtate teeohoro* solle$w hard boon .st.b&hed tE @eHWa the eduaett6~& fUotiOU Ot the &OF crnwntl fraiwly,

the tmrdnw OS teaoheru. We oo~olutk6that North Taw8 state mmh8m Ool&ge l8 ol*arly a stetugwerrmsntul

aguaoy,

and your qwctlon LB tbsmlore Wi8UOr& lc the aftirnutive.
### NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR)

TECHNICAL SUPPOR T DOCUMENT (TSD)

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL

AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

Small Electric Motors

November 24, 2009

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliance and Commercia l Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.,

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

DONALD J. TRUMP, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

 / 

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Harris Fischman, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that: 

 The Motion is GRANTED. Harris Fischman, may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Amici Curiae. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic 

filings to Harris Fischman at HFischman@paulweiss.com. 

 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 44-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this _____ day of 

_________________, 2022. 

 __________________________ 

 AILEEN M. CANNON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 44-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60725 Summary Calendar

KHAWAJA MOHAMMAD NAWAZ; NIGHAT NAWAZ; ASIF NAWAZ; NAVEEN NAWAZ, Petitioners,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A79 498 247 BIA No. A79 498 248 BIA No. A79 498 250 BIA No. A79 498 251

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Khawaja Nawaz, a native of India and a citizen of Pakistan, and Nighat, Asif, and Naveen Nawaz, natives and citizens of Pakistan, petition for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of their motion for reconsideration. The petitioners argue that the IJ erred in determining that they were removable for overstaying their visas. They contendNo. 05-60725 -2- that overstay is not a deportable offense under the Immigration and Nationality Act and that their asylum application, which they had filed before the expiration of their visas, extended their authorized period of stay. They further contend that the IJ’s failure to address their concerns about this issue at their evidentiary hearing and the IJ’s determination that they were removable violated their due process rights. This court has repeatedly held aliens to be deportable for overstaying their visas. See, e.g. , Majd v. Gonzales , 446 F.3d 590, 592 (5th Cir. 2006); Eyoum v. INS , 125 F.3d 889, 890-91 (5th Cir. 1997). Furthermore, the petitioners have not cited any statutes or case law in support of their argument that their filing of an asylum application alone extended their authorized period of stay. The record does not support the petitioners’ due process argument, and the IJ did not violate the petitioners’ due process rights in correctly concluding that the petitioners were removable. Accordingly, the petitioners’ petition for review of the BIA’s order is DENIED. All of the petitioners’ outstanding motions and petitions are also DENIED.
Version 10.2018

Request for Change in Grantee Name

A Change in Grantee Name is requested when the organization’s legal name identified on 8a. of the SF424 has changed. 

Documents Required

 A dated cover letter signed by the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) that 

includes:

o Grant Award Number(s) and current Grantee Legal Name 

o New legal name

o Effective date of change of Organization Name

o IRS Determination Letter 

How to Submit Your Request:

All requests for Change in Grantee Name should be submitted by the grantee in Grants Management 

Module as a new amendment by accessing “Manage Amendments”, click “New”, select “ACL Change in 

Grantee Name”.

GrantSolutions has a training video showing grantees how to request and manage grant amendments –

which include no-cost extension requests. This video is at the bottom of this page.”
§ 158.163 Reception facility operations. ( a ) Each person in charge and each person who is in charge of a reception facility shall ensure that the reception facility does not operate in a manner that violates any requirement under this part.
( b ) A copy of the Certificate of Adequacy issued for the port or terminal must be— ( 1 ) At each port and terminal under this part; and
( 2 ) Available for inspection by the COTP and the master, operator, person who is in charge of a ship, or agent for a ship.
( c ) Ports and terminals required to have an Operations Manual under this chapter or 46 CFR Chapter 1 must have a copy of the Certificate of Adequacy issued for the port or terminal, including any waivers, attached to that Operations Manual.
[CGD 85-010, 52 FR 7761, Mar. 12, 1987, as amended by CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18409, Apr. 28, 1989]
Exhibit 35

CERTIFICATION

I, H. Dan Farell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all other reports containing distribution information filed for the period covered by this annual
report;

2. To the best of my knowledge, the information in these reports does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;

3. To the best of my knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement is included in these reports; and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement and based upon the review
required under the transition property servicing agreement the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the transition property servicing agreement.

Date: March 9, 2006



By

/s/    H. DAN FARELL(H. Dan Farell, as Senior Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer ofTXU Electric Delivery Company, the Servicer)
**Exhibit23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (No. 000-30495) on Form S-8 of First Ottawa Bancshares,Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2007, on our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2006and 2005 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006,which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Ottawa Bancshares,Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

**BKD,****LLP**

/s/ BKD, LLP

Indianapolis, IndianaMarch 30, 2007

 

----