alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Enclosure 1 to the guarantee dated Oct. 10, 2007 in the amount of EUR 9 Mio by IPG Laser GmbH, Burbach 
 The following branches and subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank AG have entered into a business relationship with subsidiaries of IPG Laser GmbH. 
 In this context subsidiaries of IPG Laser GmbH may draw funds up to a total amount of EUR 9,000,000.00 within the EUR 20,000,000.00 umbrella credit facility dated June 18th, 2012 based on the
borrower’s guarantee in the amount of EUR 9,000,000.00 as listed below. 
 Summary of credit agreements for IPG Laser GmbH - group in
Germany and abroad: 
  

																			
	 Debitor
	  	 DB branch /
subsidiary
	  	local curreny	  	amount (in k
currency)	  	cash/discount	 	  	guarantee	 	  	total	 
	 	  	 	  	if not	  	exchange value in k Euro	 
							
	 IPG Laser GmbH, Burbach
	  	Siegen	  		  		  	 	10,000	  	  	 	3,000	  	  	 	13,000	  
							
	 Credit lines under guarantee of IPG Laser GmbH
	  		  		  		  				  				  			
							
	 IPG Photonics (Italy) S.r.l., Via Kennedy 21, 20023 Cerro Maggiore (Milano), Italy
	  	Deutsche Bank Spa, Milano, Italy	  		  		  	 	4,000	  	  				  	 	4,000	  
							
	 IRE-Polus NTO, 141190, Fryazino, pl. Vvedenskogo, Russia
	  	Deutsche Bank Ltd., Moscow, Russia	  		  		  	 	1,000	  	  	 	2,000	  	  	 	3,000	  
		  		  		  		  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 
							
	 Total Credit lines based on the borrower’s guarantee
	  		  		  		  	 	15,000	  	  	 	5,000	  	  	 	20,000	  
		  		  		  		  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 	  	  
	  
	 

  

			
	Burbach, 18 June 2012	 	
		
	Burbach, 18 June 2012	 	Seigen, 18 June 2012
	place, date	 	place, date
		
	IPG Laser GmbH	 	Deutsche Bank AG
		
		 	Filiale Deutschlandgeschäft
		
	/s/ Eugene Scherbakov	 	/s/ Joachim Gartz            /s/ Hans-Werner Bieler
	legally binding signature(s)	 	

 Being guarantor we agree with above mentioned changes of the facilites within the Credit Facility Agreement dated
June 18th, 2012 between IPG Laser GmbH and the Bank regarding the Umbrella Facility in the amount of EUR 20 million. Further we agree with all future changes within the Umbrella Facility and waive seperate information thereof, provided that the
allocation to subsidiaries of IPG Laser GmbH does not acceed an aggregate amount of Euro 9 million (cash/discount and for guarantees). 

Oxford, Massachusetts, 26 June 2012 
 place,
date 
  

	
	IPG Photonics Corporation
	
	/s/ Timoth P.V. Mammen
	legally binding signature(s)
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 62 

Recognizing the goals of Catholic Schools Week and honoring the valuable 

contributions of Catholic schools in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2007 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Ms. LANDRIEU) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the goals of Catholic Schools Week and honoring 

the valuable contributions of Catholic schools in the 

United States. 

Whereas Catholic schools in the United States have received 

international acclaim for academic excellence while providing students with lessons that extend far beyond the 

classroom; 

Whereas Catholic schools present a broad curriculum that 

emphasizes the lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values in the young people of 

the United States; 

Whereas Catholic schools in the United States today educate 

2,363,220 students and maintain a student-to-teacher 

ratio of 15 to 1; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 62 ATS 

Whereas the faculty members of Catholic schools teach a 

highly diverse body of students; 

Whereas the graduation rate for all Catholic school students 

is 95 percent; 

Whereas 83 percent of Catholic high school graduates go on 

to college; 

Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated 

to their faith, values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually stimulating environment rich in 

spiritual character and moral development; and 

Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic 

education, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops 

stated, ‘‘Education is one of the most important ways by 

which the Church fulfills its commitment to the dignity 

of the person and building of community. Community is 

central to education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently desired goal. The educational efforts 

of the Church, therefore, must be directed to forming 

persons-in-community; for the education of the individual 

Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, 

but also the destinies of the many communities in which 

he lives.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the goals of Catholic Schools 

3 Week, an event cosponsored by the National Catho4 lic Educational Association and the United States 

5 Conference of Catholic Bishops that recognizes the 

6 vital contributions of thousands of Catholic elemen7 tary and secondary schools in the United States; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 62 ATS 

1 (2) commends Catholic schools, students, par2 ents, and teachers across the United States for their 

3 ongoing contributions to education, and for the vital 

4 role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, 

5 stronger future for the United States. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
^X^^SST'^idm James Turner 

s?^i^t II 09/30/2005 04:20 PM 

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 

To: rebamburg@aol.com 

cc: 

Subject: Easement Form 

Bob, I have reviewed your edits to the easement/restrictive covenants form and found them satisfactory 

and helpful. I have a couple of questions about the form, however, and would like to talk with you briefly 

on the phone the first of next week. Thanks and take care. 

James L. Turner 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Regional Counsel (6RC-S) 

U.S. EPA Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Ste. 1200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

E-Mail: Turner.James@epa.gov 

Ph: (214)665-3159 

Fax:(214)665-6460 

9050348 

002298
NO. 07-02-0181 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D MAY 20, 2002

______________________________ JONATHON ANTWAN DONALDSON Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY; NO. 902,509; HON. MICHAEL McSPALDE N, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. Appellant, Jon ath on A ntw on D ona ldso n, a ppe als from a judgm ent under which he
was convicted of possess ion with intent to deliver cocaine weighing m ore than 1 gram and lesstha n 4. The cler k’ s re cor d ha s be en f

iled in this

cause but the reporter’ s record has not. Furtherm ore, appellant, has filed a pro se “Petition to Dism iss” requesting the appeal be withdrawn. However, the notice is not signed byapp ellan t asreq uire d by Tex as R ule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).2

Accordingl y, we now

abate this appeal and reman d the cause to the 209th Distri ct Court of Harris County (trial court) for further proc eedings. Upon rem and, th e trial court sha ll imm ediatel y cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determ ine the following: 1. whet her appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and, 2. whet her appellant is indigent. The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too sha ll it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conc lusions of law and all orders it may

issue as a result of its hearing on this m atter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transc ribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforem entioned hearing. Additionally, the district cour t shall then file the supplemental record with the clerk of th is court on or before June 19, 20 02. Should further tim e be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then an e xtension m ust be requested before Ju ne 19 , 2 00 2. Fu rt he rmo re, shoul d appellant submit to this court a docum ent
com plying with Texas Rule of Appellate Proced ure 42.2(a) and evincing his decision to withdraw his notice of appeal before the trial court convenes a hearing pursuant to this order, then the appeal will be reinstated, and the court w ill act on the matter in due course. It is so ordered. Pe r C ur i am Do not publish.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1156 Safety Zone; Offshore Marine Terminal, El Segundo, CA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: All waters of Santa Monica Bay, from surface to bottom, enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 33°54′59′′ N, longitude 118°26′50′′ W; then to latitude 33°54′59′′ N, longitude 118°27′34′′ W; then to latitude 33°54′00′′ N, longitude 118°27′34′′ W; then to latitude 33°54′00′′ N, longitude 118°26′50′′ W; then to the point of beginning (NAD 1983).
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited except for: ( i ) Commercial vessels authorized to use the offshore marine terminal for loading or unloading;
( ii ) Commercial tugs, lighters, barges, launches, or other vessels authorized to engage in servicing the offshore marine terminal or vessels therein;
( iii ) Public vessels of the United States.
( 2 ) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number 1-800-221-8724 or on VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
( 3 ) Nothing in this section shall be construed as relieving the owner or person in charge of any vessel from complying with the Navigation Rules (COLREGS and their associated Annexes and Inland Navigation Rules (33 CFR subchapter E)) and safe navigation practice.
[COTP Los Angeles-Long Beach 03-002, 70 FR 30640, May 27, 2005; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44287, July 27, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC 1350
                 (Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

         I, Levi Mochkin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Avenue Group,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the annual report on Form 10KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004
of the Company (the "Report"):

1. the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: MAY 20, 2005

                                BY: /s/ Levi Mochkin
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Levi Mochkin
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.405 What are the procedures for notifying the Commandant (CG-5P) of proposed site evaluation and pre-construction testing? ( a ) Any person who wants to conduct site evaluation and pre-construction testing at a potential site for a deepwater port must submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-5P) at least 30 days before the beginning of the evaluation or testing. The Commandant (CG-5P) advises and coordinates with appropriate Federal agencies and the States concerning activities covered by this subpart.
( b ) The written notice must include the following: ( 1 ) The names of all parties participating in the site evaluation and pre-construction testing;
( 2 ) The type of activities and the way they will be conducted;
( 3 ) Charts showing where the activities will be conducted and the locations of all offshore structures, including pipelines and cables, in or near the proposed area;
( 4 ) The specific purpose for the activities;
( 5 ) The dates when the activities will begin and end;
( 6 ) The available data on the environmental consequences of the activities;
( 7 ) A preliminary report, based on existing data, of the historical and archeological significance of the area where the proposed activities are to take place. The report must include contacts made with any appropriate State liaison officers for historic preservation; and
( 8 ) Additional information, if necessary, in individual cases.
( c ) For the following activities, the notice only needs the information required in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(5) of this section, as well as a general indication of the proposed location and purpose of the activities, including: ( 1 ) Gravity and magneto-metric measurements;
( 2 ) Bottom and sub-bottom acoustic profiling, within specified limits, without the use of explosives;
( 3 ) Sediment sampling of a limited nature using either core or grab samplers, and the specified diameter and depth to which the sampling would penetrate if geological profiles indicate no discontinuities that may have archeological significance;
( 4 ) Water and biotic sampling if the sampling does not adversely affect shellfish beds, marine mammals, or an endangered species, or if the sampling is permitted by another Federal agency;
( 5 ) Meteorological measurements, including the setting of instruments;
( 6 ) Hydrographic and oceanographic measurements, including the setting of instruments; and
( 7 ) Small diameter core sampling to determine foundation conditions.
( d ) A separate written notice is required for each site.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.495 Superior Oil Canal.

The draw of the S82 bridge, mile 6.3, in Cameron Parish shall open on signal if at least 8 hours notice is given. Public vessels of the United States and vessels in distress shall be passed as soon as possible.

[CGD08-94-029, 60 FR 4561, Jan. 24, 1995]
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.12a Definitions.

As used in §§ 157.12a through 157.12g—

*Control section* means a unit in a monitoring system composed of the items specified in § 157.12d(a)(4)(viii).

*Control unit* means a device that receives automatic signals of oil content of the effluent ppm, flow rate of discharge m3/hour, ship's speed in knots, ship's position-latitude and longitude, date and time (GMT, Greenwich Mean Time), and status of the overboard discharge control. The control unit makes automatic recordings of data as specified in § 157.12d(h)(2).

*Oil discharge monitoring and control system* or *monitoring system* means a system that monitors the discharge into the sea of oily ballast or other oil-contaminated water from the cargo tank areas and comprises the items specified in § 157.12d(a)(4).

*Overboard discharge control* means a device that automatically initiates the sequence to stop the overboard discharge of the effluent in alarm conditions and prevents the discharge throughout the period the alarm condition prevails. The device may be arranged to close the overboard valves or to stop the relevant pumps, as appropriate.

*PPM* means parts of oil per million parts of water by volume.

*Starting interlock* means a facility that prevents the initiation of the opening of the discharge valve or the operation of other equivalent arrangements before the monitoring system is fully operational when use of the monitoring system is required by the Convention.

[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3379, Jan. 16, 2009]
Exhibit

32.1

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Aberdeen Idaho Mining Company (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Thomas Prewitt, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge andbelief:

-  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Dated:      August 18, 2004   
By:      /s/ Thomas Prewitt                     
      
Thomas      Prewitt, President
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Danny Clayton Lee, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00064

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 47209

- B ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Danny Clayton Lee, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 127.1503 Portable fire extinguishers.

Each operator of a waterfront facility handling LHG must provide portable fire extinguishers of appropriate, number, size, and kind in the marine transfer area for LHG in accordance with NFPA 10 (incorporated by reference, see § 127.003).

[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5692, Feb. 2, 2022]
§ 147.815 ExxonMobil Hoover Floating OCS Facility safety zone. ( a ) *Description.* The ExxonMobil Hoover Floating OCS Facility, Alaminos Canyon Block 25A (AC25A), is located at position 26°56′33′′ N, 94°41′19.55′′ W. The area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel;
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District
[CGD08-01-025, 68 FR 4102, Jan. 28, 2003]
#### § 520.508 What records, in addition to those required by Part 516 of this chapter and section 520.203 of this part, must I keep when student-learners are employed?

Any worker employed as a student-learner shall be identified as such on the payroll records, with each student-learner's occupation and rate of pay being shown. Notations should be made in the employer's records when additional hours are worked by reason of school not being in session.
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Magnum d’Or Resources Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph J. Glusic, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
      :   January 12, 2010
                By:
                /s/ 
      Joseph J. GlusicJoseph
      J. Glusic, Chief Executive Officer and
President




A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                               Form 10-Q, Part II
                                     Item 6
                                   Exhibit 99


                       INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT



The Board of Directors
The Tranzonic Companies:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Tranzonic
Companies and subsidiaries as of August 31, 1996, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of earnings for the six- and three-month periods ended
August 31, 1996 and 1995, and cash flows for the six-month periods ended August
31, 1996 and 1995. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical review procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of The Tranzonic Companies and
subsidiaries as of February 29, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); and in our report dated March 29, 1996, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of February 29, 1996, is fairly presented, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
September 25, 1996
#### § 783.12 “Commerce”.

“Commerce” as used in the Act includes interstate and foreign commerce. It is defined in section 3(b) of the Act to mean “trade, commerce, transportation, transmission, or communication among the several States or between any State and any place outside thereof.” (For the definition of “State”, see § 783.15.) The application of this definition and the kinds of activities which it includes are discussed at length in part 776 of this chapter dealing with the general coverage of the Act.