J

- S56027

- 17

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.
RYAN THOMAS Appellant No. 75 EDA 2017

Appeal from the PCRA Order Dated December 12 , 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County Criminal Division at No: CP

- 23

- CR

- 0002727

- 2011

BEFORE: BOWES, STABILE, and PLATT, * JJ. MEMORANDUM BY STABILE, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 28, 2017 Appellant Ryan Thomas appeals from the December 12, 2016 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, which denied his request for collateral relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act (the “PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A

. §§ 9541

- 46. Upon review, we vacate and remand

. Appellant’s sole issue on appeal is that the PCRA court erred in dismissing his timely first PCRA petition challenging his mandatory minimum sentence of 60 to 120 months’ imprisonment under Alleyne v. Un ited
States , 133 S. Ct. 2151, 2161

- 63 (2013) (holding that any fact other than a prior conviction that triggers a mandatory minimum sentence must be found

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.J

- S5602 7

- 17

- 2

-

by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt). 1 Alleyne was decided on June 17, 2013, nearly four months befo re Appellant was sentenced on October 9,
2013. 2 An Alleyne challenge implicate s the legality of a sentence , which “ may be entertained as long as the reviewing court has jurisdiction. An il legal
sentence must be vacated. Issues relating to the legality o f a sentence are questions of law. Our standard of review over such questions is de novo and our scope of review is plenary. ” Commonwealth v. Ali , 112 A.3d 1210, 1225 (Pa. Super. 2015) (internal citations, quotations, and corrections omitted). A n Alleyne claim is a non

- waivable challenge to the legality of a sentence that may be raised for the first time in a timely

- filed PCRA petition , so long as the judgment of sentence was not final when Alleyne was decided.
Commonwealth v. Ruiz , 131 A.3d 54 , 5 9

- 60 (Pa. Super. 2015)

. The PCRA court and the Commonwealth now agree with Appellant’s
contention a nd urge us to vacate Appellant’s judgment of sentence and

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______
1 Appellant entered into a negotiated plea to , inter alia , possession with intent to deliver, which carried a mandatory minimum sentence under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508.
2 On November 7, 2013, the trial court denied Appellant’s post

- sentence motion. Appellant did not file a direct appeal. His judgment of sentence became final on December 9, 2013. On October 20, 2014, Appellant filed the instant PCRA petition, asserting t he Alleyne violation. The PCRA court appointed counsel who eventually filed a no

- merit letter pursuant to Commonwealth v. Turner , 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988) and Commonwealth v. Finley , 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) ( en banc ) and petitioned to withdraw from the case. The PCRA court granted counsel’s petition on November 30 , 2015. Thereafter, following the PCRA court’s issuance of a Pa.R.Crim.P. 907 notice of its intent to dismiss the petition without a hearing , the PCRA court denied Appellant PCRA relief on December 12 , 201 6

.J

- S5602 7

- 17

- 3

-

remand this matter for resentencing consistent with Alleyne

. Because Alleyne was decided before Appellant was sentenced , we agree with the parties’ and the PCRA court’s conclusion that the PCRA court’s order denying Appellant PCRA relief must be reversed

. See Commonwealth v. Mosley , 114 A

. 3d 1072 , 1091 (Pa. Super. 2015) (invalidating 18 Pa.C.S. A. § 7508) , appeal denied , 166 A.3d 1215 (Pa. 2017)

. Accordingly, we vacate Appellant’s judgment of sentence and remand for resentencing. Order reversed. Judgment of sentence vacated. Case remanded for resentencing. Jurisdiction relinquished. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 11/28/2017