alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.304 What type and how many survival craft and rescue boats must a manned deepwater port have? ( a ) Except as specified under § 149.305 of this part, each manned deepwater port must have at least the type and number of survival craft and the number of rescue boats indicated for the deepwater port in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section. ( 1 ) For a deepwater port with 30 or fewer persons on board: ( i ) One or more lifeboats with a total capacity of 100 percent of the personnel on board;
( ii ) One or more liferafts with a total capacity of 100 percent of the personnel on board; and
( iii ) One rescue boat, except that the rescue boat is not required for deepwater ports with eight or fewer persons on board.
( 2 ) For a deepwater port with 31 or more persons on board: ( i ) At least two lifeboats with a total capacity of 100 percent of the personnel on board;
( ii ) One or more liferafts with a total capacity so that, if the survival craft at any one location are rendered unusable, there will be craft remaining with a total capacity of 100 percent of the personnel on board; and
( iii ) One rescue boat.
( 3 ) Lifeboats may be substituted for liferafts.
( 4 ) Capacity refers to the total number of persons on the deepwater port at any one time, not including temporary personnel. Temporary personnel include: contract workers, official visitors, and any other persons who are not permanent employees. See § 149.305 of this part for additional survival craft requirements when temporary personnel are on board.
( 5 ) The required lifeboats may be used as rescue boats if the lifeboats also meet the requirements for rescue boats in § 149.314 of this part.
( b ) Deepwater ports consisting of novel structures or a combination of fixed and/or floating structures may require additional survival craft as deemed necessary by the Commandant (CG-5P). In these cases, the type and number of survival craft must be specified in the operations manual.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39179, July 1, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-289-000]

Take notice that on May 18, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the following tariff sheets with an effective date of June 1, 2000:

### Fifth Revised Volume No. 1

Twenty Fourth Revised Sheet No. 26B

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 180

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 181

First Revised Sheet No. 220A

### Original Volume No. 2

Forty First Revised Sheet No. 5

First Revised Sheet No. 2028 

Tennessee states this filing is to update Rate Schedules NET, NET 284 and T-180 to reflect the conversions of various shippers from Part 157 service to Part 284 service.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13363  Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.120 Waiver of required documents.

The Coast Guard waives the requirement for the letter under § 157.116(b), if a U.S. tank vessel engages in a voyage, or under § 157.118(b)(2)(ii), if a foreign tank vessel enters the navigable waters of the United States or transfers cargo at a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, for the purpose of being inspected under § 157.140.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert L. Poley, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this September 30, 2006 report on Form 10-Q of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e) for
the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



|                  |  |  |  |                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert L. Poley                 
|November 29, 2006 |  |  |  | Robert L. Poley                     
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.24 Submission of calculations, plans, and specifications. The owner, builder or designer of a new vessel to which this part applies shall submit the documentation specified in this section to the Coast Guard before that vessel enters the navigable waters of the United States. The owner, builder, or designer of a vessel that must comply with § 157.10d shall submit the documentation specified in this section to the Coast Guard before that vessel enters the navigable waters of the United States or the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. ( a ) Calculations to substantiate compliance with the tank arrangement and size requirements under § 157.19, or a letter from the government of the vessel's flag state that certifies compliance with: ( 1 ) Section 157.19; or
( 2 ) Regulations 24 of Annex I of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973.
( b ) Except for a new vessel that is a foreign vessel, calculations to substantiate compliance with subdivisions and damage stability requirements under § 157.21.
( c ) Plans and calculations to substantiate compliance with the applicable segregated ballast and double hull requirements in § 157.09, § 157.10, § 157.10a, § 157.10b, or § 157.10d, or certification from the government of the vessel's flag state that the vessel complies with the segregated ballast and double hull requirements in: ( 1 ) Sections 157.09, 157.10, 157.10a, 157.10b, or 157.10d, as applicable; or
( 2 ) For a vessel to which § 157.10d does not apply, Regulations 13 and 13E of the MARPOL 73/78.
( d ) Plans and specifications for the vessel that include: ( 1 ) Design characteristics;
( 2 ) A lines plan;
( 3 ) Curves of form (hydrostatic curves) or hydrostatic tables;
( 4 ) A general arrangement plan of each deck and level;
( 5 ) Inboard and outboard profile plans showing oiltight and watertight bulkheads;
( 6 ) A midship section plan;
( 7 ) A capacity plan showing the capacity and the vertical and longitudinal centers of gravity of each cargo space, tank, and similar space;
( 8 ) Tank sounding tables or tank capacity tables;
( 9 ) Draft mark locations;
( 10 ) Detailed plans of watertight doors; and
( 11 ) Detailed plans of vents.
[CGD 75-240, 41 FR 54180, Dec. 13, 1976, as amended by CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43708, June 30, 1980; CGD 79-152, 45 FR 82250, Dec. 15, 1980; CGD 90-051, 57 FR 36244, Aug. 12, 1992; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]
#### § 162.165 Buffalo and Rochester Harbors, New York.

In Buffalo and Rochester Harbors, no vessel may exceed 6 miles per hour, except in the outer harbors where no vessel may exceed 10 miles per hour.

Note:

The Corps of Engineers also has regulations dealing with these areas in [33 CFR Part 207](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/part-207).

[CGD 79-151, [46 FR 7960](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/46-FR-7960), Jan. 26, 1981]
§ 110.240 San Juan Harbor, P.R. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds* — ( 1 ) *Temporary Anchorage E (general).* Beginning at a point which bears 262° T, 878 yards from Isla Grande Aero Beacon; thence along a line 75°47′, 498 yards; thence along a line 134°49′, 440 yards; thence along a line 224°49′ to the northerly channel limit of Graving Dock Channel, and thence to the point of beginning.
( 2 ) *Restricted Anchorage F.* Beginning at a point which bears 212°30′, 1,337.5 yards from Isla Grande Light; thence along a line 269°00′, 550 yards; thence along a line 330°00′ to the westerly channel limit of Anegado Channel; and thence along the westerly channel limit of Anegado Channel to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Vessels awaiting customs or quarantine shall use Temporary Anchorage E. No vessel shall remain in this anchorage more than 24 hours without a permit from the U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.
( 2 ) Restricted Anchorage F shall serve both as an additional general anchorage area in cases where the temporary anchorage is full, and as an explosives anchorage for vessels loading or unloading explosives in quantities no greater than forty (40) tons, Commercial Class “A” Explosives, when so authorized by the United States Coast Guard Captain of the Port. No vessel shall enter or anchor therein without first obtaining a permit from the United States Coast Guard Captain of the Port.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by CGD 79-119, 45 FR 32673, May 19, 1980; CGD 7-83-29, 49 FR 48540, Dec. 13, 1984; 50 FR 5580, Feb. 11, 1985]
#### § 155.235 Emergency towing capability for oil tankers.

An emergency towing arrangement shall be fitted at both ends on board all oil tankers of not less than 20,000 deadweight tons (dwt), constructed on or after September 30, 1997. For oil tankers constructed before September 30, 1997, such an arrangement shall be fitted at the first scheduled dry-docking, but not later than January 1, 1999. The design and construction of the towing arrangement shall be in accordance with IMO resolution MSC.35(63) (incorporated by reference; see § 155.140).

[USCG-2001-8661, 74 FR 45026, Aug. 31, 2009]
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                   ------------



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------




We have issued our report dated August 15, 2003  accompanying  the  consolidated
financial  statements of  FinancialContent,  Inc., (f/k/a Cosmoz  Infrastructure
Solutions,  Inc.),  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30,
2002 and 2001 which is included in this Amended Annual Report. We consent to the
inclusion of our report in this Amended Annual Report.

//s// Pohl, McNabola, Berg, & Company LLP

Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company LLP


San Francisco, California
August 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

In Connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Winner, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |  |  |                                                                  
|--------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                |  | 
|                |  |  |  | /s/ Philip S. Winner                                             
|August 16, 2006 |  |  |  | Philip S. Winner President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Director
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.591 Charles River and its tributaries. ( a ) The following requirements apply to all bridges across the Charles River and it's tributaries: ( 1 ) Public vessels of the United States, state or local vessels used for public safety, and vessels in distress shall be passed through the draw of each bridge as soon as possible without delay at any time. The opening signal from these vessels is four or more short blasts of a whistle or horn, or a radio request.
( 2 ) The owners of these bridges shall provide and keep in good legible condition clearance gauges for each draw with figures not less than 12 inches high designed, installed and maintained according to the provisions of § 118.160 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Trains and locomotives shall be controlled so that any delay in opening the draw span shall not exceed ten minutes. However, if a train moving toward the bridge has crossed the home signal for the bridge before the signal requesting opening of the bridge is given, that train may continue across the bridge and must clear the bridge interlocks before stopping.
( 4 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) through (f) of this section, the draws shall open on signal.
( b ) The draw of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA/Amtrak Bridge, mile 0.8, at Boston, shall open on signal; except that from 6:15 a.m. to 9:10 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays, the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessels, except as stated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( c ) The draw of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (East Cambridge Viaduct) railroad Bridge, mile 1.0 at Boston, need not be opened for the passage of vessels. However, the operating machinery of the draw shall be maintained in an operable condition.
( d ) The draw of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (Craigie) Bridge, mile 1.0 at Boston, shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) Open on signal; except that from 6:15 a.m. to 9:10 a.m. and 3:15 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessels, except as stated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 2 ) From December 1 to March 31, the draw shall open on signal after a 24 hour advance notice is given.
( 3 ) From midnight to 8 a.m., April, May, October, and November, the draw shall open on signal after at least an eight-hour advance notice is given.
( e ) The draws of the bridges across Broad Canal, mile 0.0, need not open for the passage of vessels. However, the draws shall be returned to operable condition within one year after notification by the District Commander to do so.
[CGD1 91-141, 57 FR 30405, July 9, 1992, as amended by CGD01-02-026, 68 FR 59116, Oct. 14, 2003; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44281, July 27, 2015; USCG-2018-0443, 83 FR 30039, June 27, 2018]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 706 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in Peter Bergel v. Pacific 

Gas & Electric. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL), submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in Peter 

Bergel v. Pacific Gas & Electric. 

Whereas, in the case of Peter Bergel v. Pacific Gas & Electric, No. 0712–15723, pending in Multnomah County 

Circuit Court in Portland, Oregon, the defendant has requested testimony from Denise Racanelli, an employee in 

the office of Senator Gordon Smith; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 

288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:32 Nov 18, 2008 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR706.ATS SR706

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

SRES 706 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Denise Racanelli is authorized to tes2 tify in the case of Peter Bergel v. Pacific Gas & Electric, 

3 except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 

4 asserted. 

5 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

6 represent Denise Racanelli in connection with the testi7 mony authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Argued and submitted February 24,

affirmed October 14, 1992

#### Gary L. DALE, *Appellant, v.*STATE OF OREGON through its BUILDING CODES AGENCY, *Defendant,*Karen GREEN and Deschutes County, *Respondents.*

(90-CV-0252TM; CA A69189)

839 P2d 274

Patricia Campbell, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Karen Majcher Art, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent State of Oregon. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

*581-aRichard L. Isham, Legal Counsel, Bend, waived appearance for respondents Karen Green and Deschutes County.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*582PER CURIAM

Plaintiff brought an action against the State of Oregon Building Codes Agency (Agency), Deschutes County (County) and Karen Green, seeking a declaratory judgment that his general supervisor’s electrician’s license is valid and requesting an order restraining and enjoining County and Green from denying permits to persons employing plaintiff as an electrician because Agency had not issued him a license. He also brought a claim against Agency under 42 USC § 1983. The trial court dismissed the section 1983 claim, as well as the declaratory judgment action against Agency, and entered a judgment on the pleadings for County and Green.

Plaintiff sought review of the trial court’s action as to all defendants. However, after the briefs were filed, plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal as to Agency on the ground that plaintiffs “license had been restored to him.” Agency then was dismissed as a parly to the appeal. Plaintiffs claim against County and Green is dependent on its claim against Agency. Because plaintiff makes no separate arguments as to the judgment for County or Green, there is nothing left to review.

Affirmed.
* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation. 

** Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11031

 

A. J. SINGLETON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF FORT WORTH; ET AL,

Defendants,

THE CITY OF FORT WORTH,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:98-CV-238)

 

July 12 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE*,

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

We are not persuaded that there is a genuine issue of material

fact regarding Singleton’s claims made under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for

the reason that a reasonable jury could not find the requisite
2

causation between a city policy and the claimed injury. The

remaining claims are equally without merit. 

AFFIRMED.