alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No._______________________

CLERK’S NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY

The Clerk’s Office has received the document(s) submitted in the above referenced case. The 

document(s) do not comply with the requirements of the Local Rules, CM/ECF Administrative 

Procedures, or the Federal Rules. The documents have been accepted for filing; however, please 

note the deficiencies noted below. 

☐ Document(s) were filed conventionally that should have been filed electronically (see 

CM/ECF Administrative Procedures). 

☐ Document(s) missing required signature(s) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a); Fed.R.Cr.P 49(d)). 

☐ Translation not provided for documents written in foreign language (See CM/ECF 

Administrative Procedures). 

☐ Civil Cover Sheet not filed pursuant to Local Rule 3.3.

☐ Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice was not filed with the required fee of $_______ 

($75.00 per attorney per case), pursuant to Special Rules Governing the Admission 

and Practice of Attorneys, Local Rule 4(b). Please submit the required fee.

☐ Case was not filed with required filing fee of $__________ (civil cases:$400.00; memo 

cases: $46.00; habeas cases: $5.00) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914 (a), and the CM/ECF 

Administrative Procedures. Summons(es) will not be issued until the filing fee is paid or 

an order granting the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is entered.

☐ Pursuant to Administrative Order 2014-86, parties applying for a writ of garnishment 

should no longer pay $100 into the Court registry and instead make that payment to the 

garnishee upon demand under amended section 77.28, Florida Statutes. The $100 

payment is being returned via U.S. Mail. 

Date: ___________________

ANGELA E. NOBLE

Court Administrator • Clerk of Court 

By: ___________________________ 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### § 154.1320 Response plan submission requirements.

An owner or operator of a facility that handles, stores, or transports other non-petroleum oils shall submit a response plan in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, and with all sections of subpart F of this part, except §§ 154.1045 and 154.1047, which apply to petroleum oils.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21490]



[[Page 52735]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

August 18, 2011.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the 
submissions\ may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before September 
22, 2011 to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tabacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0099.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Administrative Remedies--Closing Agreements.
    Abstract: This is a written agreement between TTB and regulated 
taxpayers used to finalize and resolve certain tax-related issues. Once 
an agreement is approved, it will not be reopened unless fraud or 
misrepresentation of material facts is proven.
    Respondents: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
    Clearance Officer: Gerald Isenberg, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 
Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005; 
(202) 453-2165.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-21490 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
To view the FULL MENU

Starters

Know the Rules

Get the 411 on what the Older Americans Act says about voluntary contributions. Also 

review your State Unit on Aging, Area Agency on Aging and local service provider 

policies for more detail.

Determine Cost Per Meal

Determine cost per meal and review existing funding structure.

Review Effectiveness

Review effectiveness of existing voluntary contributions practices and materials, 

including suggested contribution tables or amounts. Need a refresh? Check out the 

Intervention Pack for ideas and an explanation of how specific voluntary contributions 

practices can help drive consumer behavior.

Review Value Proposition

Does the Senior Nutrition Program (SNP) offer valuable, innovative and participantcentered services to help maximize contributions? Check out examples of how 

nutrition service programs are doing just that.

Main Dishes (Do’s)

Educate 

Educate consumers and 

stakeholders

Simplify 

Ask for contributions and make it 

easy

Diversify 

Diversify funding to include nonOAA meals

Analyze 

Analyze the total cost of services

Innovate

Create a compelling value 

proposition

Off the Menu (Don’ts)

- Means test for services

- Coerce consumers into 

 contributing

- Implement cost-sharing for 

 OAA meals

- Use contributions to expand a

 different service

- Describe nutrition services as a 

 “free meal”

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, 

Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government 

sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, 

necessarily represent official ACL policy.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Report of Vertical  Computer  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date  April 13, 2006                By:    /s/ Richard Wade
                                           ----------------
                                    Name:  Richard Wade
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided  by  Vertical  Computer
Systems,  Inc. will be retained by Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34444-34445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 051800A]


Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit 1235.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that NMFS has issued a permit to the 
City of Seattle (City) that authorizes incidental take of Endangered 
Species Act-listed anadromous fish, subject to certain conditions set 
forth therein.

ADDRESSES: The applications and related documents are available for

[[Page 34445]]

review in the following office, by appointment:
    Washington State Habitat Branch, 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 103, 
Lacey, WA 98503

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Landino (360-753-9530)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The permit and permit amendment were issued 
under the authority of section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) and the NMFS regulations 
governing ESA-listed fish and wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 222-227).
    The City's covered activities include watershed management and 
related operations as described in the Cedar River Watershed Habitat 
Conservation Plan (HCP) and associated Draft Environmental Assessment 
(EA), Final EA and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). The FONSI 
was signed on April 19, 2000.
    Notice was published on December 11, 1998, and January 5, 1999 (63 
FR 68469, and 64 FR 480) that an application had been filed by the City 
for an incidental take permit. Permit 1235 was issued to the City on 
April 21, 2000. Permit 1235 authorizes the City incidental take of 
threatened Puget Sound (PS) chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). As 
well, other anadromous fish that are not now ESA-listed are covered 
species and would be included on the permit at time of listing. Permit 
1235 expires on December 31, 2050.
    Issuance of the permit was based on a finding that the City had met 
the permit issuance criteria of 50 CFR 222.22(c). The permit will take 
effect for listed covered species on the effective date of a rule under 
Section 4(d) of the ESA prohibiting take of the species. For unlisted 
covered species, the permit will take effect upon the listing of a 
species as endangered, and for a species listed as threatened, on the 
effective date of a rule under Section 4(d) of the ESA prohibiting take 
of the species.

    Dated: May 24, 2000.
Wanda L. Cain,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-13430 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Exhibit


32.1








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
R. Lefevre, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Dated:
May 20,
2009                                                                           By:           /s/ George R.
Lefevre


George R. Lefevre
CEO
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of R.T.M. and I.M., Children

No. 06-14-00063-CV

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 79,495). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellants have adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of 

appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 4, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Office of Procurement and Property Management, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of public availability of FY 2010 Service Contract inventories.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), Department of Agriculture is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2010 Service Contract inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2010. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on                               ( print page 5779)                            November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​omb/​procurement/​memo/​service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.*                         Department of Agriculture has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the Office of Procurement and Property Management homepage at the following link:                         *http://www.dm.usda.gov/​procurement/​.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to Mrs. Dorothy Lilly in the Procurement Policy Division, of OPPM at 202-690-2064 or                         *Dorothy.Lay@dm.usda.gov.*

Dated: January 25, 2011.

Dorothy Lilly,

Division Chief for Procurement Policy, Departmental, Office of Procurement and Property Management. 

[FR Doc. 2011-2137 Filed 2-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-96-P
#### DANIEL B. BUSH and others, Appellants, *v.*HENRY R. TREADWELL, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Special Term, in favor of the defendant.

The plaintiffs are collateral heirs of Chauncey Bush, who died intestate, October 27, 1865, leaving no widow or child him surviving.

They bring this action, claiming to redeem certain lands described in the complaint, on the ground that a conveyance of the premises by quitclaim deed, executed by said Chauncey Bush to the defendant, on or about the 11th day of August, 1856, was in fact intended as a mortgage; and they allege that the conveyance was executed under an agreement by and between the intestate and the defendant, that the intestate should convey the lands to the defendant, and that the same should be held by the latter as security for the repayment by said Chauncey, of such moneys as he, the said Treadwell, should advance on account of said lands upon said mortgage, assessments and taxes, and that he, the said defendant, would, upon being repaid the same, reconvey the said premises to him; the said Chauncey Bush, or to his heirs or assigns.

The principal question of the case was one purely of fact, and the General Term was of opinion, that the learned justice before whom it was tried, having heard all the evidence on both sides, and decided that upon all the evidence in the case he was unable *647to find that the conveyance was made or intended by said Ghauneey Bush, or accepted by said defendant, as a trust as' alleged in the complaint, the judgment below should not be disturbed.

*James*Emott, for the appellants.

*B. K. Phelps,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 10-Q/A


              QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended      September 30, 1998
                      ------------------------------
Commission File Number 1-8037

                              AEROFLEX INCORPORATED

             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

          DELAWARE                                             11-1974412
(State or other jurisdiction                                (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)                          Identification No.)

    35 South Service Road
        Plainview, N.Y.                                          11803
(Address of principal executive offices)                       Zip Code)
                                 (516) 694-6700
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


*Indicate  by check  mark  whether  the  Registrant  (1) has filed all  reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934 during the  preceding  12 months,  and (2) has been  subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                         Yes   X                      No

  Indicate the number of shares  outstanding of each of the issuer's  classes of
common stock as of the latest practicable date.

   
November 6, 1998  17,558,526  shares (excluding 39,159 shares held in treasury)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     (Date)                      (Number of Shares)
    

<PAGE>





                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



                                                 AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
                                                      (REGISTRANT)


   
November 24, 1998                            By: s/Michael Gorin
                                                   Michael Gorin
                                             President, Chief Financial Officer
                                               and Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 15
 
Exhibit 15--Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information
 
Board of Directors
AmSouth Bancorporation
 
  We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and in their related Prospectuses, of our report dated November 12,
1996 relating to the unaudited consolidated financial statements of AmSouth
Bancorporation and subsidiaries which are included in its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996:
 
  Form S-3 No. 33-55683 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common
     Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-52243 pertaining to the assumption by AmSouth
     Bancorporation of FloridaBank Stock Option Plan and FloridaBank Stock
     Option Plan-1993;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-52113 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive
     Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-35218 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive
     Compensation Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-37905 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-9368 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation
     Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-2927 (as amended) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase
     Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 2-97464 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation
     Plan;
 
  Form S-3 No. 33-35280 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common
     Stock Purchase Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-19016 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation
     Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-18653 pertaining to the 1987 Substitute Stock Option Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 33-58777 pertaining to the Director Restricted Stock Plan;
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-02099 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift
     Plan;
 
  Form S-3 No. 333-06641 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation 7 1/2%
     Convertible Subordinated Debentures; and
 
  Form S-8 No. 333-05631 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation 1996 Long
     Term Incentive Compensation Plan.
 
  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a
part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of Sections 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
November 12, 1996
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Secured Financial Network, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Jeffrey L. Schultz, in my capacity as Principal Accounting Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April
              17, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Michael
              FasciMichael
              FasciTitle Principal
              Accounting Officer
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of  Innofone.com,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  2002,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Janne
Vilhunen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Janne Vilhunen
--------------------------
Janne Vilhunen
Chief Executive Officer
October 11, 2002