alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
                             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                              (SEC Coverage)
                                                (Unaudited)

                                                                Years Ended December 31,
                                                                -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 1997         1996       1995        1994        1993
                                                 ----         ----       ----        ----        ----
                                                                    (In Thousands)
<S>                                                 <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Net Income                                     $ 65,758     $37,926     $29,101    $34,726     $23,779
----------

Add income taxes and fixed charges
----------------------------------
  Current federal income taxes                   34,244      25,867       9,437     (6,762)      5,606
  Deferred federal income taxes                     912      (6,052)      6,156     24,932       3,430
  Investment tax credits - net                   (1,103)     (1,118)     (1,132)    (1,228)     (1,228)
  Massachusetts franchise tax                     7,514       4,479       3,935      4,681       3,348
  Interest on long-term debt                     27,612      27,089      25,901     20,967      23,403
  Interest on short-term debt and other           7,214       6,473       6,784      6,366       3,638
                                               --------     -------     -------    -------     -------
Net earnings available for fixed charges       $142,151     $94,664     $80,182    $83,682     $61,976
                                               --------     -------     -------    -------     -------

Fixed charges:
  Interest on long-term debt                   $ 27,612     $27,089     $25,901    $20,967     $23,403
  Interest on short-term debt and other           7,214       6,473       6,784      6,366       3,638
                                               --------     -------     -------    -------     -------
     Total fixed charges                       $ 34,826     $33,562     $32,685    $27,333     $27,041
                                               ========     =======     =======    =======     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 4.08        2.82        2.45       3.06        2.29
----------------------------------

</TABLE>
Your Program Name

Attendance Log

Instructions to Program Leaders/Coaches/Instructors: Please clearly print the Program Information and the Participant IDs below. Write

participants’ IDs as they appear on their Participant Information Form.

Mark each session that the participant attends with an X

Implementation Site Name: __________________________________

Program Start Date (mm/dd/yyyy) __ __/__ __/__ __ __ __

Program Start Date (mm/dd/yyyy) __ __/__ __/__ __ __ __

PARTICIPANT S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8. 

9. 

10

*Adapt this section to include the number of possible sessions. Use additional pages if needed.

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number (OMB 0985-0039). Public reporting burden for this 

collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this 

collection is required to retain or maintain benefits under the statutory authority of the Older Americans Act and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. OMB Control No. 0985-0039. Exp. Date 04/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 28, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Lobby Level Hearing Room.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Public Hearing on Regulatory Framework/
Intermediaries and Clearing.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-14034 Filed 5-31-00; 3:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
OLDER

AMERICANS

MONTH

BLAZE A TRAIL : MAY 2016

BLAZE A

TRAIL

may 2016

www.acl.gov/olderamericansmonth
#### Tolbert *v.*The State.

Argued February 18,

Decided March 1, 1907.

Indictment for mnrder. Before Judge Bawlings. Jenkins superior court. December 12, 1906.

*H. B. Strange,*for plaintiff in error.

*John G. Hart, attorney-general,*and *Alfred Herrington, solicitor-general,*contra.-

Evans, J.

1. “It is not tile duty of the court to carve up the ease into different propositions, and instruct the jury specifically on each as to reasonable doubt, but to submit the case as a whole upon all the evidence, and instruct upon the subject of doubt in appropriate terms upon the whole case.” *Carr*v. *State,*84 *Ga.*250.

2. A new trial will not be'granted in a criminal case, where the evidence strongly supports the verdict, and where the judge fully and fairly charged the jury concerning the law of reasonable doubt, solely because of the refusal to give a request instructing them, in effect, that if they have a reasonable doubt as to the existence of some particular and specially enumerated fact, or what should be the proper inference therefrom, it would be their duty to give the accused the benefit of such doubt. McDuffie v. *State,*90 *Ga.*786; *Delk*v. *State,*92 *Ga.*453; *Williams*v. *State,*123 *Ga.*138; *Cress*v. *State,*126 *Ga.*564.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*

Chief Justice Fish was prevented by sickness from participating in the decisions where he is reported to have been absent, in this and the next preceding volume.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER99-1971-007]

Take notice that on May 19, 2000, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a Notice of Implementation, dated May 17, 2000, which specifies that, effective June 1, 2000, the ISO will implement electronic dispatch of resources through its Automated Dispatching System and will require that Scheduling Coordinators participating in the ISO's Real-Time Energy market be capable of receiving electronic dispatch instructions beginning on that date.

The ISO states that this filing has been served on all parties listed on the official service list in the above-referenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 9, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14124 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

     Inconnection with the annual report of TMSF Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to his knowledge: 

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Raymond EshaghianRaymond EshaghianChief Executive OfficerMay 2, 2007 

/s/ Daniel M. Rood Daniel M. RoodChief Financial OfficerMay 2, 2007 

     Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to thecompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
§ 156.115 Person in charge: Limitations. ( a ) No person may serve as the person in charge of transfer operations on more than one vessel at a time during transfers between vessels or between two or more vessels and a facility unless authorized by the COTP.
( b ) No person may serve as the person in charge of both a vessel and a facility during transfer operations unless authorized by the COTP.
[CGD 75-124, 45 FR 7177, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36255, Sept. 4, 1990]
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1319 Seafair Air Show Performance, Seattle, WA. ( a ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced annually during the last week in July and the first two weeks of August from 8 a.m. until 4 p.m., each day during the event. The event will be one week or less in duration. The specific dates during this time frame will be published in the Federal Register.
( b ) *Location.* The following is a safety zone: All waters of Lake Washington encompassed by the following points: 47°36′17.28′′ N, 122°14′49.44′′ W; thence west to point 47°36′17.28′′ N, 122°16′58.56′′ W; thence south along the shoreline to Andrews Bay at point 47°33′04.62′′ N, 122°15′32.46′′ W; thence northeast along the shoreline of Bailey Peninsula to its northeast point at 47°33′44.98′′ N, 122°15′03.48′′ W; thence easterly to point 47°33′43.98′′ N, 122°13′51.36′′ W on Mercer Island; thence northerly along the shore of Mercer Island to point 47°35′45.12′′ N, 122°14′49.44′′ W; thence north back to the point of origin.
( c ) *Regulations.* In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the zone except for support vessels and support personnel, vessels registered with the event organizer, or other vessels authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representatives. Vessels and persons granted authorization to enter the safety zone shall obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain of the Port or his designated representatives.
[CGD13-04-002, 69 FR 35250, June 24, 2004, as amended by USCG-2012-0903, 78 FR 12600, Feb. 25, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.12g Plan approval requirements. Adequate documentation must be prepared well in advance of the intended installation of a monitoring system and must be submitted to the Marine Safety Center for approval. The following documentation must be submitted: ( a ) *A description of the monitoring system.* The description must include a diagram of the pumping and piping arrangements identifying the operational outlets for dirty ballast and oil-contaminated water from the cargo-tank area and compatible with the operational requirements set out in the oil tanker's cargo and ballast handling manuals. Special considerations will be given to installations in oil tankers, which have unusual pumping and piping arrangements.
( b ) Equipment manuals, supplied by manufacturers, which must contain details of the major components of the monitoring system.
( c ) An operations and technical manual for the complete monitoring system which is proposed to be installed in the oil tanker. This manual must cover the arrangements and operation of the system as a whole and must specifically describe parts of the system, which are not covered by the manufacturer's equipment manuals.
( d ) The operations section of the manual must include normal operational procedures and procedures for the discharge of oily water in the event of malfunction of the equipment.
( e ) The technical section of the manual must include adequate information (description and diagram of the pumping and piping arrangements of the monitoring system and electrical/electronic wiring diagrams) to enable fault finding and must include instructions for keeping a maintenance record.
( f ) A technical installation specification defining, among other things, the location and mounting of components, arrangements for maintaining the integrity of the boundary between safe and hazardous spaces, and the arrangement of the sample piping, including calculation of the sample response time referred to in § 157.12d(b)(6). The installation must comply with manufacturer's specific installation criteria.
( g ) A copy of the certificate of type approval for the oil content meter.
( h ) Technical documentation relevant to other main components of the monitoring system. This documentation must include the vibration report for the control section of the monitoring section.
( i ) A recommended test and checkout procedure specific to the monitoring system installed. This procedure must specify all the checks to be carried out in a functional test by the installation contractor and must provide guidance for the surveyor when carrying out the onboard survey of the monitoring system and confirming the installation reflects the manufacturer's specific installation criteria.
[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3379, Jan. 16, 2009]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14268]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT010-1220-DA]


Motorized Vehicle Use Within the Following Areas of Critical 
Environmental Concern: Bridger Fossil Area; East Pryor Mountain; 
Meeteetse Spires; Petroglyph Canyon and Weatherman Draw, within Carbon 
and Musselshell Counties, Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The decision to approve the designation of seven ACEC's within 
Carbon and Yellowstone Counties, Montana with associated restrictions 
on motorized vehicle use is final. Motorized use in the Bridger Fossil 
Area, East Pryor Mountain, Meeteese Spires, Petroglyph Canyon and Stark 
Site ACEC's is restricted to designated roads. Motorized vehicle use in 
the Weatherman Draw ACEC is limited to authorized use only. The final 
decision was signed on March 10, 1999 and the restrictions became 
effective on April 10, 1999. These areas are posted with signs listing 
the specific restrictions for each area.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Brooks, Field Manager, BLM, 
Billings Field Office, PO BOX 36800, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, 
Montana, 59107 or 406-896-5013.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority for this action is outlined in 
sections 302, 303 and 310 of the Federal Land Policy and Mangement Act 
of October 21, 1976, (43 U.S.C. 1716) and Title 43 Code of Federal 
Regulations Subject 8364 (43 CFR 8364.1). Any person who fails to 
comply with this closure is subject to arrest and a fine up to $1000 or 
imprisonment not to exceed 12 months, or both. These restrictions apply 
to all persons except persons authorized by the Bureau of Land 
Management.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
Sandra S. Brooks,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-14268 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-U
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Alexanders, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. November 3, 2004
    
    /s/ Joseph MacnowName: Joseph MacnowTitle: Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO: 22-CV-81294-AMC

DONALD J. TRUMP,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

MOTION TO FILE PRIVILEGE REVIEW TEAM

LETTER DATED OCTOBER 5, 2022, UNDER SEAL

The United States of America, through the undersigned attorneys assigned to its Privilege 

Review Team, respectfully move this Court to file under seal a Privilege Review Team letter that 

was transmitted to the Special Master and Plaintiff’s counsel on October 5, 2022.

[1] The Privilege 

Review Team letter should be sealed because it refers, in part, to documents that have been 

designated potentially privileged. See DE:91 at ¶ 9 (directing Special Master to file under seal any 

potentially privileged . . . material that is submitted to be filed under seal).

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully request permission to file this letter under 

[1] The United States consulted with Plaintiff’s counsel. On October 7, 2022, and Plaintiff’s 

counsel agreed the letter should be filed under seal.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
seal for preservation in the record.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: /s/Anthony W. Lacosta 

Anthony W. Lacosta

Managing Assistant United States Attorney - WPB

Court. No. A5500698

500 S. Australian Avenue (4th Floor)

West Palm Beach, Florida 33132 

Ph: (561) 209-1015

email: anthony.lacosta@usdoj.gov

/s/Benjamin J. Hawk_____________

Benjamin J. Hawk

Deputy Chief for Export Control and Sanctions

National Security Division

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20530

New Jersey Bar No. 030232007

Ph: (202) 307-5176

Email: Benjamin.Hawk@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTFIY that on October 11, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

/s/Anthony W. Lacosta 

Anthony W. Lacosta

Managing Assistant United States Attorney - WPB

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 155.470 Prohibited spaces. ( a ) In a ship of 400 gross tons and above, for which the building contract is placed after January 1, 1982 or, in the absence of a building contract, the keel of which is laid or which is at a similar stage of construction after July 1, 1982, oil or hazardous material must not be carried in a forepeak tank or a tank forward of the collision bulkhead.
( b ) A self-propelled ship of 300 gross tons and above, to which paragraph (a) of this section does not apply, may not carry bulk oil or hazardous material in any space forward of a collision bulkhead except: ( 1 ) For a ship constructed after June 30, 1974, fuel oil for use on the ship may be carried in tanks forward of a collision bulkhead, if such tanks are at least 24 inches inboard of the hull structure; or
( 2 ) For a ship constructed before July 1, 1974, fuel oil for use on the ship may be carried in tanks forward of a collision bulkhead, if such tanks were designated, installed, or constructed for fuel oil carriage before July 1, 1974.
[CGD 75-124a, 48 FR 45715, Oct. 6, 1983, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36254, Sept. 4, 1990]
~~ NORTH DAKOTA

DEPARTMENT of HEALTH

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION

Gold Seal Center, 918 E. Divide Ave.

Bismarck, ND 58501-1947

701.328.5200 (fax)

www.ndhealth.gov

January 11,2010

John Graves, P.E.

Environmental Manager

Minnkota Power Cooperative

1822 Mill Road

P.O. Box 13200

Grand Forks, ND 58208-3200

Re: SCR Cost Estimate

Dear Mr. Graves:

FILE

The Department and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have reviewed the "NOx Best

Available Control Technology Analysis Study - Supplemental Report" for Units 1 and 2 at the

M.R. Young Station as well as the supplementary information dated December 11, 2009. Based

on the information submitted to date, there are several preliminary questions regarding the

information presented. Although you addres~ed several of the concerns in our meeting of

December 21, 2009, we ask that you provide a written response to all of the following items so

that the final cost SCR numbers can be fully analyzed:

1) How were the SCR reactors sized and the catalyst volume determined and what target

NOx control efficiency was used to size the catalyst? How was the cost of the catalyst

determined?

2) Anhydrous ammonia appears to be a less expensive reagent than urea for the SCR system

due to local availability. A justification must be supplied for selecting urea over

anhydrous ammonia.

3) Support must be provided for the catalyst cleaning/replacement outage periods. This

should include an explanation of the method used to estimate the outage time and

clarification whether the outage time includes the regular outage period.

4) The indirect capital costs associated with the project appear to be high. A detailed

explanation ofthe estimation method must be supplied.

5) Support must be provided for the cost of natural gas and electricity.

Environmental Health

Section Chief's Office

701.328.5150

Division of

Air Qualily

701.328.5188

Division of

Municipal Facilities

701.328.5211

Printed on recycled paper.

Division of

Waste Management

701.328.5166

Division of

Water Quality

701.328.5210
Mr. Graves 3 January 11, 2010

We ask that you supply the requested information by February 11, 2010.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.

Respectfully,

.

~~O~ Terry L. O'Clair, P.E.

Director

Division ofAir Quality

TLO/TB:csc

xc: Hans Buenning, EPA

Maggie Olson, Asst. Attorney General