alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.517 Safety Zone; Back River, Hampton, VA; Air Show. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: all navigable waters from the shoreline of the Back River contained within the following points: 37°5′34.32′′ N, 076°20′47.13′′ W; 37°5′38.05′′ N, 076°20′36.49′′ W; 37°5′30.53′′ N, 076°20′31.86′′ W.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, *designated representative* means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Virginia (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not be present in, or enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section when it is subject to enforcement unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
( 2 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by VHF-FM Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
( d ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced annually on the third or fourth Friday through Sunday in April or the first or second Friday through Sunday in May from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day during the event.
[USCG-2023-20774, 88 FR 20774, Apr. 7, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 98 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 98

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2007

Mrs. Feinstein submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected members of the following joint committees of Congress:
    Joint Committee on Printing: Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Inouye, Mrs. 
Murray, Mr. Bennett, and Mr. Chambliss.
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. 
Dodd, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Bennett, and Mr. Stevens.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 153.109 CERCLA delegations.

The delegations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) are published in § 1.01-70 of this chapter.

[CGD 83-009, 49 FR 575, Jan. 5, 1984]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MICHELLE LONG,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 27 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
# • SPA 15 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 134: Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015 Listing) (cont'd) RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 134 Correction of Beryllium Powder (PO15) Listing 59 FR31551-31552 June 20, 1994 (RCRA Cluster IV, Non-HSWA provisions) Note: On April 22, 1988, EPApublished atechnical correction tothe lists of hazardous wastes in 40 CFR261.33(e) and (f) (Revision Checklist 46, 53 FR 13382). In that notice, however, the word "dust" was inadvertently omitted from the P015 listing for "beryllium dust" in the 261.33(e) list of hazardous wastes. In addition, it became apparent thatthe term "beryllim dust" is not used by the industryto describe this commerical chemical product; the actual term used by the industry is "beryllium powder". This technical correction adds "powder" to the P015 hazardous waste listing for "beryllium" and makes conforming changes to the list of hazardous constituents in Part 261 Appendix VIII and to Table 2 in § 268.42(a).

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRACITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION WAC 173-303- STATE ANALOG IS: EQUIV­ lESS MORE BROADER ALENT STRIN- STRIN- IN SCOPE GENT GENT 

# • PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUSWASTE SUBPART D--L1STS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES, CONTAINER RESIDUES, AND SPILL RESIDUES THREREOF correct the PO15 261.33(e) 9903 X listing as shown below

Hazardous Chemical waste abstracts

No. No. Substance

P015 7440-41-7 Berryllium powder 

# •

DCl134.15• Revised: 07/16/94 Printed: 7/29/98 June 20, 1994- Page 1 of 2

### SPA

# 150 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 134: Correction of Beryllium Powder (P015 Listing) (cont'd)

APPENDIX VIII TO PART 261
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS correctthe PO15 Appendix VIII 9905 X listing as shown below

Common name Chemicalabstractsname Chemicalabstracts No. HazardouswasteNo.
Beryllium powder Same 7440-41-7 POlS 

# o PART 268 - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS SUBPART D - TREATMENT STANDARDS TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED AS SPECIFIEDTECHNOLOGIES change the PO15 268.42(a)/Table 2 140(2)(a) X entry's waste description from "beryllium dust" to "beryllium powder"

DC1134.15· Revised: 07/16/94 Printed: 7/29/98 June 20, 1994- Page 2 of 2
1 

Background and Purpose

A. Goal: 

The goal of the grant is to improve the health and wellbeing of homebound seniors who are receiving 

home-delivered meals (from a Senior Nutrition Program (SNP)) by providing personal health nursing and 

to simultaneously reduce and/or contain their per member/per month (pm/pm) Medicare costs.

B. Objectives: 

1) Strengthen the coordination of care and services for vulnerable seniors who are aging in place.

2) Address medical and quality of life issues to prevent crises and improve health.

3) Assess impact on costs, to petition policymakers to redirect resources to assist more seniors.

C. Overview of Project: 

Education, Health, and Research International (EHRI) led an Administration for Community Living Nutrition 

Innovations Grant award to create an effective system of finding and serving the target area’s most 

vulnerable seniors aging in place. The project relied upon the Title III Senior Nutrition Program (SNP) 

organization’s strong, established relationships with homebound individuals to identify seniors most likely 

to benefit from personalized, no-cost, nursing services. WeCare Personal Health Nurses establish one on 

one client relationships that are marked by routine communication, practical problem-solving, liaison to 

medical services and benefits, and linkage to available community resources.

D. Project Results: 

• Served 229 diverse seniors and conducted over 10,464 phone calls to address social determinants of 

health, coordinate medical care, arrange needed services, link to resources and benefits, and more.

• Reduced or maintained ADL/IADL scores.

• Rendered Medicare cost savings.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification by Stephen Mack pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Inforte Corp. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                |  |     |  | Inforte Corp.          
| | -------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |                |  |     |  |                        
| |                |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen Mack       
| | March 26, 2007 |  |     |  | Stephen Mack,          
| |                |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

---
#### § 155.4055 Temporary waivers from meeting one or more of the specified response times.

(a) You may submit a request for a temporary waiver of a specific response time requirement, if you are unable to identify a resource provider who can meet the response time.

(b) Your request must be specific as to the COTP zone, operating environment, salvage or marine firefighting service, and response time.

(c) Emergency lightering requirements set forth in [§ 155.4030(b)](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-155.4030#p-155.4030(b)) will not be subject to the waiver provisions of this subpart.

(d) You must submit your request to the Assistant Commandant for Response Policy (CG-5R), via the local COTP for final approval. The local COTP will evaluate and comment on the waiver before forwarding the waiver request, via the District, to the Assistant Commandant (CG-5R) for final approval.

(e) Your request must include the reason why you are unable to meet the time requirements. It must also include how you intend to correct the shortfall, the time it will take to do so, and what arrangements have been made to provide the required response resources and their estimated response times.

(f) Assistant Commandant for Response Policy (CG-5R), will only approve waiver requests up to a specified time period, depending on the service addressed in the waiver request, the operating environment, and other relevant factors. These time periods are listed in Table [155.4055(g)](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-155.4055#p-155.4055(g)).

(g) Table [155.4055(g)](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-155.4055#p-155.4055(g)) lists the service waiver time periods.

Table [155.4055](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-155.4055)(g)—Service Waiver Time Periods

| Service | Maximum waiver time period (years) |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Remote salvage assessment & consultation | 0 |
| (2) Remote firefighting assessment & consultation | 0 |
| (3) On-site salvage & firefighting assessment | 1 |
| (4) Hull and bottom survey | 2 |
| (5) Salvage stabilization services | 3 |
| (6) Fire suppression services | 4 |
| (7) Specialized salvage operations | 5 |

(h) You must submit your waiver request 30 days prior to any plan submission deadlines identified in this or any other subpart of part 155 in order for your vessel to continue oil transport or transfer operations.

[USCG-1998-3417, [73 FR 80649](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-80649), Dec. 31, 2008, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, [79 FR 38437](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-38437), July 7, 2014; USCG-2016-0498, [82 FR 35082](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/82-FR-35082), July 28, 2017]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 471

To amend title 49, United States Code, to grant the State of New York

authority to allow tandem trailers to use Interstate Route 787 between

the New York State Thruway and Church Street in Albany, New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1999

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to grant the State

of New York authority to allow tandem trailers to use

Interstate Route 787 between the New York State

Thruway and Church Street in Albany, New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 31112(c) of title 49, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘AND IOWA’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘IOWA, AND NEW YORK’’;

7 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

8 (3);
2

•HR 471 IH

1 (3) by striking the period at the end of para2 graph (4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (4) by inserting at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(4) New York may allow the operation of tan5 dem trailers not in actual operation on June 1,

6 1991, on Interstate Route 787 between exit 23 on

7 the New York State Thruway and the Church Street

8 and I–787 interchange in Albany, New York.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EC00-27-001 and EC00-28-001]


UtiliCorp United Inc., et al.; Notice of Filing

May 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 19, 2000, UtiliCorp United Inc., et al. 
filed their response to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) letter order dated April 17, 2000 in the above-referenced 
dockets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 8, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14129 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Mt An 2-1 (4-99)Cattle

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

April 1999 3 NASS, USDAOnApeFebMar 1 
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

April 1999 4 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed: Number on Feed, 1,000+ Capacity Feedlots,

by Month, State, and United States 1998-99 1

State Apr 1, 1998 Mar 1, 1999

Apr 1, 1999

Number as % of

1998

as % of

Mar

1,000 Head 1,000 Head 1,000 Head Percent Percent

AZ

CA

CO

ID

IA

KS

NE

NM

OK

SD

TX

WA

Oth Sts

US

212

370

1,000

285

325

2,100

2,060

91

370

167

2,540

178

420

10,118

203

385

1,130

275

 *360

2,020

2,160

107

365

184

2,610

181

430

 *10,410

214

385

1,120

280

360

2,070

2,180

94

345

182

2,560

179

415

10,384

101

104

112

98

111

99

106

103

93

109

101

101

99

103

105

100

99

102

100

102

101

88

95

99

98

99

97

100

* Revised.

1 Cattle and calves on feed are animals for slaughter market being fed a ration of grain or other concentrates and are

expected to produce a carcass that will grade select or better.


Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

April 1999 7 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed: Number on Feed by Class, 1,000+ Capacity Feedlots,
The next "Cattle on Feed" report will be released at 3 p.m. ET on May 21, 1999.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs

on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual

orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons

with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille,

large prinll wdiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice

and TDD).
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.308 What are the requirements for liferafts? ( a ) Each liferaft must be an inflatable liferaft approved under approval series 160.151, or a rigid liferaft approved under approval series 160.118.
( b ) Except as under § 149.305(b) of this subpart, each inflatable or rigid liferaft, boarded from a deck that is more than 4.5 meters (14.75 feet) above the water, must be davit-launched or served by a marine evacuation system complying with § 149.309 to this subpart.
#### Pulliam’s Executrix v. Johnson and Anderson.

March 8th, 1813.

i. Joint Executors — Bond by One — Suit on.* — If one of two executors take a bond to himself as executor of the testator (without mentioning' the other,) his executor may sue upon it, notwithstanding the other executor survived him, and acted as such, and gave no assent to the institution of the suit.

*

See monographic *note*on Executors and Administrators” appended to Rosser v. Depriest, 5 Gratt. 6.

Sally Pulliam, executrix of Jennings Pulliam, who was executor of John Anderson, brought an action against the appellees, in the County Court of Louisa, on a bond executed by them to the said Jennings Pulliam, executor of John Adderson, for a sum of money, “to be paid to the said executor, his heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns.” The defendants pleaded, “that the plaintiff ought not to have and maintain her said action, &c., because they say, that a certain John B. Anderson was co-executor, with the said Jennings Pulliam the testator of the plaintiff, on the estate of John Anderson deceased, at the time of the execution of the bond in the declaration mentioned ; that he the said John B. Anderson hath survived the said Jennings, and is still living and acting as the executor on the estate of the said John Anderson deceased ; and that the said John B. Anderson hath never given his consent to the commencement and prosecution of the said action; all which the defendants are ready to verify.” To this plea the plaintiff filed a general demurrer. *The County Court was of opinion that the law was for the defendants; and its judgment being affirmed by the Superior Court of law, the plaintiff appealed to this court.

Thursday, March 18th, 1813, both judgments were reversed, upon the authority of the decision in the case of Bowden executor of Moore v. Taggart; (ante p.-;) the court being of opinion that the law upon the demurrer was in favour of the appellant: and, there being another plea, (viz. “payment,”) the cause was remanded for farther proceedings. (3)

(3)

 Note. See Syme v. Griffin, 4 H. & M. 277.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1095
In Re: MONICA B. YOUNG, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-151-H4) Submitted: April 10, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monica B. Young, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Monica B. Young has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to direct the district court to issue summonses in cases previously dismissed by the district court and whose dismissals were affirmed on appeal. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Young has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Young’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we deny her petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Volberg *v.*Gate City Terminal Company *et al.*

Argued January 8,

Decided March 1, 1907.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton su■perior court. November 26, 1906.

*Kontz & Austin,*for plaintiff.

*Rosser & Brandon*and *Brown*cf- *Randolph,*for defendants.

•Cobb, P. J.

This case, as to all material questions involved, is, in principle, controlled by the decision this day rendered in *Bridwell*v. *Gate City Terminal Company,*ante

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1411 Security zone; waters surrounding U.S. Forces vessel SBX-1, HI. ( a ) *Location.* The following area, in U.S. navigable waters within the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone (see 33 CFR 3.70-10), from the surface of the water to the ocean floor, is a security zone: All waters extending 500 yards in all directions from U.S. Forces vessel SBX-1. The security zone moves with the SBX-1 while it is in transit and becomes fixed when the SBX-1 is anchored, position-keeping, or moored.
( b ) *Regulations.* The general regulations governing security zones contained in 33 CFR 165.33 apply. Entry into, transit through, or anchoring within this zone while it is activated, and thus subject to enforcement, is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a designated representative thereof.
( c ) *Suspension of enforcement.* The Coast Guard will suspend enforcement of the security zone described in this section whenever the SBX-1 is within the Honolulu Defensive Sea Area (see 6 FR 6675).
( d ) *Informational notice.* The Captain of the Port of Honolulu will cause notice of the enforcement of the security zone described in this section to be made by broadcast notice to mariners. The SBX-1 is easy to recognize because it contains a large white object shaped like an egg supported by a platform that is larger than a football field. The platform in turn is supported by six pillars similar to those on large oil-drilling platforms.
( e ) *Authority to enforce.* Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, and any other Captain of the Port representative permitted by law, may enforce the security zone described in this section.
( f ) *Waiver.* The Captain of the Port may waive any of the requirements of this rule for any person, vessel, or class of vessel upon finding that application of the security zone is unnecessary or impractical for the purpose of maritime security.
( g ) *Penalties.* Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject to the penalties set forth in 46 U.S.C. 70036 and 46 U.S.C. 70052.
[USCG-2007-0195, 73 FR 13131, Mar. 12, 2008, as amended by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019]