52008 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Notices 

Citation 30 CFR 281 Reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements Hour burden 

Average Number 

of annual 

reponses 

Annual 

burden 

hours 

TOTAL BURDEN 11 Responses 1,248 Hours 

$50 Non-Hour Cost Burden 

Estimated Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Non-Hour Cost Burden: 

We have identified one non-hour cost 

burden. In § 281.41, respondents would 

pay a $50 application fee for any 

instrument to be filed (see burden table). 

We have identified no other non-hour 

cost burdens for this collection of 

information. 

Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA 

(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. Until OMB approves a 

collection of information, you are not 

obligated to respond. 

Comments: Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) 

requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide 

notice * * * and otherwise consult 

with members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information * * *’’ 

Agencies must specifically solicit 

comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the agency to perform its 

duties, including whether the 

information is useful; (b) evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (c) enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

minimize the burden on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

To comply with the public 

consultation process, on April 15, 2011, 

we published a Federal Register notice 

(76 FR 21393) announcing that we 

would submit this ICR to OMB for 

approval. The notice provided the 

required 60-day comment period. In 

addition, § 282.0 provides the OMB 

control number for the information 

collection requirements imposed by the 

30 CFR 282 regulations. The PRA (5 

U.S.C. 1320) informs the public that 

they may comment at any time on the 

collections of information and BOEMRE 

provides the address to which they 

should send comments. We have 

received one comment in response to 

this effort and it was not germane to the 

paperwork burden. 

If you wish to comment in response 

to this notice, you may send your 

comments to the offices listed under the 

ADDRESSES section of this notice. The 

OMB has up to 60 days to approve or 

disapprove the information collection 

but may respond after 30 days. 

Therefore, to ensure maximum 

consideration, OMB should receive 

public comments by September 19, 

2011. 

Public Availability of Comments: 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

BOEMRE Information Collection 

Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz (703) 

787–1025. 

Dated: July 26, 2011. 

David Moore, 

Acting Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory 

Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21166 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R1–R–2011–N093; 1265–0000–10137– 

S3] 

Kea ̄lia Pond National Wildlife Refuge 

(NWR) and Kakahai’a NWR, Maui 

County, HI; Draft Comprehensive 

Conservation Plan and Environmental 

Assessment 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 

availability of our draft comprehensive 

conservation plans and environmental 

assessments (Draft CCPs/EAs) for the 

Kea ̄lia Pond and Kakahai’a National 

Wildlife Refuges (Refuges), for public 

review and comment. The Draft CCPs/ 

EAs describe our proposals for 

managing the Refuges for the next 15 

years. 

DATES: To ensure consideration, we 

must receive your written comments by 

September 19, 2011. We will also 

announce opportunities for public input 

in local news media throughout the CCP 

process. 

ADDRESSES: Additional information 

about the Refuges is available on our 

Web sites http://www.fws.gov/ 

kealiapond/and http://www.fws.gov/ 

kakahaia/. You may submit comments 

or request CD–ROM copies of the Draft 

CCPs/EAs by any of the following 

methods. A limited number of printed 

copies of the Draft CCPs/EAs are also 

available. 

E-mail: 

FW1PlanningComments@fws.gov. 

Include ‘‘Kea ̄lia Pond/Kakahai’a NWRs’’ 

in the subject line of the message. 

Fax: Attn: Glynnis Nakai, Project 

Leader, (808) 875–2945. 

U.S. Mail: Glynnis Nakai, Project 

Leader, Maui National Wildlife Refuge 

Complex, P.O. Box 1042, Kı ̄hei, Hawai’i 

96753. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Glynnis Nakai, Project Leader, (808) 

875–1582 (phone). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Introduction 

With this notice, we continue the CCP 

process for the Refuges. We started this 

process through a notice in the Federal 

Register (74 FR 53755; October 20, 

2009). 

The Kea ̄lia Pond and Kakahai’a 

Refuges are part of the Maui National 

Wildlife Refuge Complex. Kea ̄lia Pond 

Refuge is located along the southern 

shore of the island of Maui. It was 

established in 1992 for the purpose of 

providing habitat for endangered 

Hawaiian waterbirds, specifically, the 

endangered Hawaiian stilt (ae’o), and 

endangered Hawaiian coot (’alae 

ke’oke’o). Kea ̄lia Pond is one of the 

largest natural wetlands remaining in 

the Hawaiian Islands. The 704-acre 

Kea ̄lia Pond Refuge is administered 

under a perpetual conservation 

easement provided by Alexander and 

Baldwin, Inc. The Refuge encompasses 

open water, fresh to brackish water 

marsh, mudflat, grassland, upland 

shrub, and coastal beach strand habitats. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Notices 52009 

The Refuge also contains one of the 

largest concentrations of wetland birds 

in Hawai’i, and is an important 

breeding, feeding, and resting area for 

the ae’o and ’alae ke’oke’o. In addition, 

Kea ̄lia Pond Refuge provides a strategic 

landfall for migratory birds coming from 

Alaska, Siberia, and Asia, including 

Northern pintail (koloa ma ̄pu), Northern 

shoveler (koloa moha ̄), lesser scaup, 

Pacific golden-plover (ko ̄lea), and ruddy 

turnstone (‘akekeke). A total of 110 bird 

species have been documented on 

Kea ̄lia Pond Refuge. A majority of the 

Refuge is closed to general public 

access; however, trails, overlooks, and 

educational programs provide the 

public with opportunities to view some 

of Hawai’i’s endangered and migratory 

wildlife. 

The Kakahai’a Refuge is located on 

the southeastern coast of the island of 

Moloka’i. It was established to protect 

and provide habitat for endangered 

species. Habitats found on this Refuge 

include open water, freshwater marsh, 

mudflat, grassland, and shrubland. An 

inland Hawaiian fishpond is also 

located on the Refuge. Some of the more 

common migrants are koloa ma ̄pu and 

ko ̄lea. Kakahai’a Refuge is closed to the 

general public; however, volunteers 

occasionally conduct wetland education 

programs. 

Background 

The CCP Process 

The National Wildlife Refuge System 

Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 

668dd–668ee) (Refuge Administration 

Act), as amended by the National 

Wildlife Refuge System Improvement 

Act of 1997, requires us to develop a 

CCP for each national wildlife refuge. 

The purpose for developing a CCP is to 

provide refuge managers with a 15-year 

plan for achieving refuge purposes and 

contributing toward the mission of the 

National Wildlife Refuge System, 

consistent with sound principles of fish 

and wildlife management, conservation, 

legal mandates, and our policies. In 

addition to outlining broad management 

direction on conserving wildlife and 

their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities 

that are compatible with a refuge’s 

purposes, including opportunities for 

hunting, fishing, wildlife observation 

and photography, and environmental 

education and interpretation. We will 

review and update the CCP at least 

every 15 years in accordance with the 

Refuge Administration Act. 

Public Outreach and CCP Issues 

We started the public scoping phase 

of the CCP planning process in 2009 by 

publishing a Notice of Intent (NOI) in 

the Federal Register (74 FR 53755; 

October 20, 2009), announcing our 

intention to complete a CCP/EA for the 

Kea ̄lia Pond and Kakahai’a Refuges, and 

requesting public comments. 

Concurrently, we released Planning 

Update 1, to provide information to the 

public and various stakeholders 

regarding our planning process, the 

Refuges’ purposes, and our preliminary 

issues, goals, and objectives. We also 

invited the public to two open house 

meetings and requested public 

comments in the NOI and Planning 

Update 1. In November 2009, we held 

two public open house meetings in 

Kı ̄hei and Kaunakakai, HI. 

In Planning Update 2, released in 

February 2010, we summarized the 

comments we received, listed the 

preliminary management issues we used 

to draft alternatives, and presented our 

refined goals and objectives. In March 

2011, we released Planning Update 3. 

We described our preliminary 

alternatives and identified our preferred 

alternatives in the update, and 

requested comments. We identified the 

following key issues during our 

planning and public involvement 

process, and addressed them in the 

Draft CCPs/EAs. 

• Reduce threats to native habitats, 

endangered species, migratory birds, 

and other native wildlife at Kea ̄lia Pond 

Refuge, from invasive California bulrush 

and pickleweed plants; and nonnative 

rats, Indian mongooses, and cats. 

Identify more efficient techniques to 

control the most aggressive invasive 

species. 

• Reduce midge swarms, wind-blown 

dust, and foul-smelling tilapia die-offs 

that originate on Kea ̄lia Pond Refuge, 

and encroach on neighboring property. 

• Expand opportunities for wildlifedependent public uses on Kea ̄lia Pond 

Refuge, and manage public uses to 

prevent wildlife and habitat 

disturbances. 

• Develop restoration plans and stepdown habitat management plans, and 

identify alternative water sources for 

endangered waterbird habitat on both 

Refuges. 

• Increase funding for and 

maintenance of equipment and facilities 

that are exposed to and degraded by the 

Refuges’ coastal marine environmental 

conditions. 

• Increase law enforcement to protect 

both Refuges’ resources. 

• Conduct baseline surveys of 

invertebrates and their associated 

vegetation, to facilitate adaptive 

management at both Refuges. 

• Increase staff presence on the 

Kakahai’a Refuge, to improve habitat 

management, volunteer efforts, and 

visitor services. 

Draft CCP Alternatives We Are 

Considering 

During the public scoping process 

with which we started work on these 

Draft CCPs/EAs, we, other governmental 

partners, and the public raised several 

issues. To address these issues we 

developed and evaluated three 

alternatives for managing each Refuge. 

In each Draft CCP/EA, we present our 

evaluation of the environmental effects 

of each alternative, and identify 

Alternative C as our preferred 

alternative. Alternative C was selected 

in both documents, because it best 

achieves the Refuges’ purposes, visions, 

and goals; contributes to the National 

Wildlife Refuge System mission; 

addresses issues and relevant mandates; 

and is consistent with principles of 

sound fish and wildlife management. 

Summaries of our alternatives follow. 

Kea ̄lia Pond Refuge Draft CCP/EA 

Alternatives 

Alternative A: No Change 

Under Alternative A, we would 

continue current management. 

Management of threatened and 

endangered species would focus on 

waterbird protection and successful 

nesting, in support of Hawaiian 

Waterbird Recovery Plan 

implementation. Public use programs 

would remain virtually unchanged. We 

would rely on natural, annual flooding, 

to manage habitat, and supplemental 

flooding, to provide habitat for 

waterbirds. The open-water, 200-acre 

Kea ̄lia Pond is subject to the natural 

hydrological cycle, represented by high 

water in winter, receding water April to 

September, and complete drying 

October to November. The seasonal 

mudflats at Ma ̄’alaea would not be 

actively managed. 

The Refuge’s proposed Molokini Islet 

Unit (a proposed overlay refuge) would 

continue to be managed as a seabird 

colony. We would visit the unit one or 

two times per year, to monitor the 

seabird population, and continue a 

collaborative, long-term bird-banding 

project with the Hawai’i Department of 

Land and Natural Resources (HDLNR). 

There are three nuisance issues at 

Kea ̄lia Pond that impact downwind 

neighbors, they include: Nonnative 

insects (midges), dust, and fish die-off 

odor. In extended high-water years, an 

invasive midge species reproduces 

multiple times, and the resulting 

swarms encroach on adjacent property. 

The Refuge would continue to control 

midges by treating the main pond with 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
52010 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Notices 

an insect growth inhibitor during peak 

abundance. 

An overabundance of tilapia, a 

nonnative fish, occurs during extended 

flood conditions in the main pond. 

When the water recedes, the tilapia dieoff emanates a foul odor, and the 

decaying fish must be raked out of the 

mud to remove the biomass. The Refuge 

would continue to trap and remove 

tilapia from the pond under Alternative 

A. 

When water in the main pond recedes 

due to evaporation, trade winds 

disperse dust from the pond to the 

south-southeast side of the Refuge, and 

onto neighboring properties. Under 

Alternative A, we would continue to 

control windblown sediment by 

pumping and sheetflowing water into 

the main pond, targeting the pond’s 

upper north edge. 

Alternative B: Restoration Focus 

Under Alternative B, we would 

identify and implement more efficient 

techniques for controlling the most 

aggressive invasive species, prepare a 

restoration plan and step-down habitat 

management plan with an inventory and 

monitoring protocol, and identify 

alternative water sources for endangered 

waterbirds. Developing a water source 

for Ma ̄’alaea Flats would be a priority, 

enabling managing water levels for 

foraging, resting, and breeding ae’o, and 

providing enhanced wildlife viewing 

opportunities from the Kea ̄lia Coastal 

Boardwalk. We would conduct 

additional studies to evaluate the 

impacts visitors have on endangered 

waterbirds. Monitoring on the proposed 

Molokini Islet Unit would increase to 

two or three visits per year, for 

monitoring breeding and banding 

chicks. Methods to control nuisances 

(midges, dust, and tilapia) would be 

similar to Alternative A, until the 

Refuge is able to manipulate water 

levels in the open-water pond. 

Alternative C: Wetland Capacity Focus 

(Preferred Alternative) 

Under Alternative C, we would 

increase our ability to control water in 

the main pond and adjacent vegetated 

mudflats, remove the most aggressive 

invasive plants, and control pickleweed 

on the flats. Refuge enhancements 

would include constructing a water 

control structure, developing new wells 

to deliver water to target areas, and 

recontouring the topography, to 

maintain water on the flats. Increasing 

our capability to dewater and flood the 

main pond, would enhance our midge 

and tilapia control efforts. 

Public uses would be similar to 

Alternatives A and B; however, new 

vegetated barriers and/or blinds would 

be provided for better wildlife viewing 

opportunities. Additional visitor 

services staff would recruit and train 

volunteers to assist with Refuge 

programs, and increase environmental 

educational opportunities. 

Monitoring on the proposed Molokini 

Islet Unit would include three to six 

visits annually, during seabird nesting 

season (March to November). Very little 

information is known about ’ou 

(Bulwer’s petrels) nesting on Molokini 

Islet; therefore, we would begin a 

monitoring program to determine the 

population’s parameters. In addition, we 

would initiate a native plant restoration 

plan, particularly for ’ihi (Portulaca 

molokiniensis), a Federal and State 

species of concern. Volunteers would 

assist with propagating plants in the 

Refuge’s greenhouse, and outplanting 

would be conducted by Federal and 

State biologists under a cooperative 

agreement with HDLNR. 

Kakahai’a Refuge Draft CCP/EA 

Alternatives 

Alternative A: Continue Current 

Management (No Change) 

Under Alternative A, no changes in 

current management would occur. 

Wetland management would continue 

to be limited, due to staff and funding 

limitations. An overgrowth of pest 

plants, including trees and shrubs on 

levees, would continue to hinder efforts 

to manage the habitat on a small scale. 

Sedimentation would continue to 

degrade wetland habitat, resulting in 

even fewer waterbirds using the habitat; 

therefore we would not restart predator 

control activities. Management at 

Kakahai’a Refuge would be limited to 

treating pest plant species along the 

fence line with herbicide, maintaining 

access to gages and piezometers, 

monitoring water levels, and replacing 

the perimeter fence, as funding permits. 

The Refuge would remain closed to 

visitors. 

Alternative B: Restoration and 

Biodiversity Focus 

Under Alternative B, we would 

restore 10.5 acres of wetland habitat at 

Kakahai’a Refuge. We would create a 

water source for 5.5 acres of the Refuge’s 

New Pond, by constructing a well, 

installing a water pump and distribution 

line, and repairing the electric panel. 

This alternative would create foraging 

and resting habitat for ae’o and ’alae 

ke’oke’o, and potential nesting habitat 

for ae’o. Removing 5 acres of invasive 

vegetation would recreate open water 

habitat in Old Pond. If feasible, the Old 

Pond’s topography would be 

recontoured in areas where California 

bulrush has been removed, to create 

foraging and nesting habitat for ’alae 

ke’oke’o. Water level management in 

both ponds would also enhance 

invertebrate abundance. We would 

resume waterbird monitoring and 

predator control. The perimeter fence 

would be repaired or replaced to 

minimize the occurrence of invasive 

mammals such as axis deer, pigs, and 

dogs. 

Under Alternative B, we would 

compile available data on the ecology of 

the wetlands, and evaluate wetland 

geomorphology and hydrology, to 

restore wetland habitat for the ae’o and 

’alae ke’oke’o. The Refuge would remain 

closed to the public, except for issuing 

Special Use Permits for environmental 

education and interpretation activities. 

We would develop an earthen platform 

outside the fence along the entrance 

road to the Refuge, for wildlife viewing 

opportunities. Refuge staff visits would 

coincide with volunteer work group 

activities. 

Alternative C: Wetland Capacity Focus 

(Preferred Alternative) 

Under Alternative C, we would 

restore the 15-acre Old Pond, and 5.5 

acres of the New Pond. Old Pond 

restoration activities would include 

removing California bulrush and other 

aggressive nonnative species, dredging 

accumulated sediment, recontouring the 

pond’s bathymetry, removing and 

reconfiguring radial levees, 

reconstructing perimeter levees, 

replacing the water control structure, 

and replacing the pump between the 

two ponds. Restoring Old Pond would 

provide open water and emergent 

habitat for breeding, foraging, and 

nesting ’alae ke’oke’o. Natural 

groundwater springs would also supply 

water to Old Pond, which would reduce 

the need for supplemental water. A 

well, pump, water distribution line, and 

water control outlet would be 

constructed for New Pond, and levees 

would be rebuilt, which would enable 

us to flood and dewater the ponds to 

provide semi-permanent and seasonal 

habitat for ae’o, ’alae ke’oke’o, and 

migratory waterbirds. All monitoring 

activities would resume as part of the 

wetland restoration. A predator-proof 

fence would be installed, to protect 

wetland habitat and species. 

We would work with the Hawai’i 

Department of Transportation, to modify 

the culvert passing under Kamehameha 

V Highway, to allow water from the 

upper watershed and periodic 

dewatering of the wetlands to flow to 

the ocean naturally, without blockage 

from sand. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2011 / Notices 52011 

Maintaining the wetlands at Kakahai’a 

Refuge would require regular onsite 

Refuge staff presence. The opportunities 

for visitors to engage in compatible 

wildlife-dependent recreation would 

expand, depending on staffing. At a 

minimum, a kiosk would be constructed 

on an earthen mound along the Refuge 

entrance road. Volunteer groups would 

assist Refuge staff with restoration and 

maintenance activities. 

Public Availability of Documents 

We encourage you to stay involved in 

the CCP planning process by reviewing 

and commenting on the proposals we 

have developed in the Draft CCPs/EAs. 

Copies of the documents are available 

by request from the Maui National 

Wildlife Refuge Complex, Milepost 6, 

Mokulele Highway, Kı ̄hei, HI. The Draft 

CCPs/EAs are also available for 

downloading on our Web site http:// 

www.fws.gov/pacific/planning. 

Public Meetings 

We will hold the following public 

meetings. In Moloka’i, the meeting is 

September 7, 2011, 6:30 to 8 p.m. at the 

Mitchell Pauole Center, 90 Ainoa Street, 

Kaunakakai, Hawai’i. In Maui, the 

meeting is September 8, 2011, from 6:30 

to 8 p.m. at the Kı ̄hei Community 

Center, 303 E. Lipoa Street, Kı ̄hei, 

Hawai’i. For more information on the 

meetings, contact the person under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Next Steps 

After the comment period ends, we 

will analyze the comments we receive 

and address them in the Final CCPs and 

decision documents. 

Public Availability of Comments 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: June 21, 2011. 

Robyn Thorson, 

Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21326 Filed 8–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Indian Affairs 

Proclaiming Certain Lands, Forest 

Service Lands, as an Addition to the 

Bay Mills Indian Reservation for the 

Bay Mills Indian Community of 

Michigan 

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Reservation 

Proclamation. 

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public 

that the Assistant Secretary—Indian 

Affairs proclaimed approximately 842 

acres, more or less, to be added to the 

Bay Mills Indian Reservation for the Bay 

Mills Indian Community of Michigan. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben 

Burshia, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

Division of Real Estate Services, Mail 

Stop 4639–MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202) 

208–7737. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

Notice is published in the exercise of 

authority delegated by the Secretary of 

the Interior to the Assistant Secretary— 

Indian Affairs by part 209 of the 

Departmental Manual. 

A proclamation was issued according 

with Section 7 of the Act of June 18, 

1934 (48 Stat. 986; 25 U.S.C. 467), for 

the land described below. The land was 

proclaimed to be an addition to the Bay 

Mills Indian Reservation and part of the 

Bay Mills Indian Community of 

Michigan for the exclusive use of 

Indians on that Reservation who are 

entitled to reside at the Reservation by 

enrollment or tribal membership. 

Bay Mills Indian Community 

Reservation 

Michigan Meridian Township of Bay 

Mills, Chippewa County, Michigan 

South One Half (1⁄2) of Southeast One 

Quarter (SE 1⁄4), Section 13, Township 

47 North, Range 3 West (80 acres); 

That part of the NW 1⁄4 of SE 1⁄4, 

Section 13, Township 47 North, Range 

3 West, and Government Lot 2 described 

as, Beginning at the Southeast corner of 

said Government Lot 2; thence 

Northerly along the east line of said 

Government Lot 2 to the shore of Lake 

Superior; thence Westerly and parallel 

to the south line of said Government Lot 

2 to the centerline of the Point Iroquois 

Road (FR 3150); thence southeasterly 

and along said centerline to the south 

line of Government Lot 2; thence 

Easterly and along said south line to the 

Southeast corner of Government Lot 2 

and the Place of Beginning (26.0 acres); 

That part of the NW 1⁄4 of the SE 1⁄4, 

Section 13, Township 47 North, Range 

3 West, lying westerly of the centerline 

of the Point Iroquois Road (FR 3150) 

(37.0 acres); Northeast One Quarter (NE 

1⁄4) of Southwest One Quarter (SW 1⁄4), 

Section 13, Township 47 North, Range 

3 West (40 acres); Southeast One 

Quarter (SE 1⁄4) of Southwest One 

Quarter (SW 1⁄4), Section 13, Township 

47 North, Range 3 West (40 acres); 

The Southerly 500 feet of the 

Southeast One Quarter (SE 1⁄4) of the 

Northwest One Quarter (NW 1⁄4), 

Section 13, Township 47 North, Range 

3 West (15 acres); Part of the SW 1⁄4 of 

NE 1⁄4, Section 13, Township 47 North, 

Range 3 West, described as: Beginning 

at a point on the west line of said SW 

1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 which lies 500 feet north of 

the Southwest corner; thence South and 

along said west line a distance of 500 

feet to said Southwest corner of the SW 

1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4; thence east and along the 

South line of said SW 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 to the 

Southeast corner of said SW 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4; 

thence North and along the East line of 

said SW 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 a distance of 700 

feet; thence southwesterly to the west 

line of said SW 1⁄4 of NE 1⁄4 and the 

Place of Beginning, EXCEPT that 

portion lying easterly of the centerline 

of the Point Iroquois Road (FR 3150) 

(14.0 acres); 

Government Lot 1, Section 23, 

Township 47 North, Range 3 West, 

EXCEPT 10 acres described as follows: 

Beginning at the Northwest corner of 

said Government Lot 1; thence East a 

distance of 417.42 feet; thence South 

and parallel with the west line a 

distance of 1,043.55 feet; thence West 

and parallel with the north line a 

distance of 417.42 feet to the west line; 

thence North along the west line to the 

Northwest corner and the Place of 

Beginning (30.0 acres); 

Northwest One Quarter (NW 1⁄4) of the 

Southwest One Quarter (SW 1⁄4), Section 

24, Township 47 North, Range 3 West 

(40 acres); 

Southwest One Quarter (SW 1⁄4) of 

Section 25, Township 47 North, Range 

3 West (160 acres); 

West One Half (W 1⁄2) of the Southeast 

One Quarter (SE 1⁄4), Section 25, 

Township 47 North, Range 3 West (80 

acres); 

Southeast One Quarter (SE 1⁄4) of 

Southeast One Quarter (SE 1⁄4), Section 

25, Township 47 North, Range 3 West 

(40 acres); 

Northwest One Quarter (NW 1⁄4) of 

Section 36, Township 47 North, Range 

3 West (160 acres); and 

West One Half (W 1⁄2) of Northeast 

One Quarter (NE 1⁄4), Section 36, 

Township 47 North, Range 3 West (80 

acres). 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES