alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 120 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women’s Health 

Week, and for other purposes. 

Whereas women of all backgrounds should be encouraged to 

greatly reduce their risk of common diseases through preventative measures, such as engaging in regular physical 

activity, eating a nutritious diet, and visiting a healthcare 

provider to receive regular check-ups and preventative 

screenings; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HCON 120 RFS 

Whereas significant disparities exist in the prevalence of disease among women of different backgrounds, including 

women with disabilities, African-American women, Asian/ 

Pacific Islander women, Latinas, and American Indian/ 

Alaskan Native women; 

Whereas healthy habits should begin at a young age; 

Whereas preventative care saves Federal dollars designated 

for health care; 

Whereas it is imperative to educate women and girls about 

key female health issues; 

Whereas it is recognized that offices of women’s health within 

the Department of Health and Human Services, the 

Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, 

and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality provide services that support women’s health research, education, and other services that benefit women of all ages, 

races, and ethnicities; 

Whereas the annual National Women’s Health Week begins 

on Mother’s Day and celebrates the efforts of national 

and community organizations working with partners and 

volunteers to improve awareness of key women’s health 

issues; and 

Whereas in 2009, the week of May 10 through May 16 is 

designated National Women’s Health Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HCON 120 RFS 

1 (1) recognizes the importance of preventing dis2 eases that commonly affect women; 

3 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

4 Women’s Health Week; 

5 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

6 use National Women’s Health Week as an oppor7 tunity to learn about the health issues women face; 

8 (4) calls on the women of the United States to 

9 observe National Women’s Check-Up Day by receiv10 ing preventative screenings from their health care 

11 providers; and 

12 (5) recognizes the importance of Federal, State, 

13 and private programs that provide research and col14 lect data on common diseases in women. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 19, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      622
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (147)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         219,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                (35,862)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        204,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,174
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,099
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,007
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,664
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    922
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       922
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.550 What are the requirements for the muster list? ( a ) A muster list must be posted on each pumping platform complex.
( b ) The muster list must: ( 1 ) List the name and title of each person, in order of succession, who is the person in charge of the pumping platform complex for purposes of supervision during an emergency;
( 2 ) List the special duties and duty stations for each person on the pumping platform complex, in the event of an emergency that requires the use of equipment covered by part 149 of this chapter; and
( 3 ) Identify the signals for calling persons to their emergency stations and for abandoning the pumping platform complex.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.434 Caddo Lake.

The draw of the Kansas City Southern railroad bridge, mile 26.4 near Mooringsport, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.

[CGD82-025, 49 FR 17452. Redesignated by CGD08-96-053, 64 FR 8722, Feb. 23, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 562 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 562

 Honoring Concerns of Police Survivors as the organization begins its 
  25th year of service to family members of law enforcement officers 
                      killed in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2008

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Brown, Mr. Menendez, Ms. 
    Mikulski, Mr. Craig, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. 
  Feinstein, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Lautenberg, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Nelson of 
 Florida, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Smith, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Tester, 
and Mr. Thune) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring Concerns of Police Survivors as the organization begins its 
  25th year of service to family members of law enforcement officers 
                      killed in the line of duty.

Whereas Concerns of Police Survivors has showed the highest amount of concern 
        and respect for tens of thousands of family members of officers killed 
        in the line of duty;
Whereas those families bear the most immediate and profound burden of the 
        absences of their loved ones;
Whereas Concerns of Police Survivors is starting its 25th year as a bedrock of 
        strength for the families of the Nation's lost heroes;
Whereas it is essential that the Nation recognize the contributions of Concerns 
        of Police Survivors to those families; and
Whereas National Police Week, observed each year in the week containing May 15, 
        is the most appropriate time to honor Concerns of Police Survivors: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes and thanks Concerns of Police Survivors for 
        assisting in the rebuilding of the lives of family members of 
        law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty across the 
        United States;
            (2) honors Concerns of Police Survivors and recognizes the 
        organization as it begins its 25th year of service to the 
        families of the fallen heroes of the Nation;
            (3) urges the people of the United States to join with the 
        Senate in thanking Concerns of Police Survivors; and
            (4) recognizes with great appreciation the sacrifices made 
        by police families and thanks them for providing essential 
        support to one another.
                                 <all>
```
1 

By ECF and Courtesy Copy October 20, 2022 

Judge Raymond J. Dearie 

United States District Court 

Eastern District of New York 

225 Cadman Plaza East 

Brooklyn, NY 11202 

Re: Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, Case No. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

– Filter A Documents Respecting Document Categorization and Executive 

Privilege 

Dear Judge Dearie: 

As noted in the Defendant’s October 20, 2022 submission (ECF 150) the parties 

met and conferred regarding Filter A documents on October 19, 2022. Up until receipt of 

the Defendant’s October 20, 2022 filing, we anticipated that there would be a joint 

submission and an exchange between the parties preceding that joint submission to confirm 

both parties’ positions. This is consistent with the process that was undertaken for the 

October 3, 2022 joint submission with the Filter Team. Instead, the government filed its 

own log and presented its legal positions on the documents for which there is dispute 

between the parties. 

Unfortunately, the log submitted by the government is not fully accurate as to the 

Plaintiff’s position on various documents. 

In light of these facts, the Plaintiff will file our position on the documents that remain 

in dispute by the close of business on October 24, 2022. 

 Sincerely, 

 

James M. Trusty 

Ifrah Law PLLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 650 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

Telephone: (202) 524-4176 

Email: jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com 

Christopher M. Kise 

Chris Kise & Associates, P.A. 

201 East Park Avenue, 5th Floor 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

Telephone: (850) 270-0566 

Email: chris@ckise.net 

Lindsey Halligan 

Florida Bar No. 109481 

511 SE 5th Avenue 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

Email: lindseyhalligan@outlook.com 

M. Evan Corcoran 

SILVERMAN|THOMPSON|SLUTKIN| 

WHITE, LLC 

400 East Pratt Street – Suite 900 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

Telephone: (410) 385-2225 

Email: ecorcoran@silvermanthompson.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff President Donald J. 

Trump 

CC: Jay I. Bratt, jay.bratt2@usdoj.gov 

 Julie A. Edelstein, julie.edelstein@usdoj.gov 

 Anthony W. Lacosta, anthony.lacosta@usdoj.gov 

Stephen Marzen, Stephen.Marzen@usdoj.gov 

Juan Antonio Gonzalez, Jr., juan.antonio.gonzalez@usdoj.gov 

Benjamin Hawk, Benjamin.Hawk@usdoj.gov 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2022 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

d0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

137866

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137866 COA: 286156 Wayne CC: 87-002000 MARC RICHARD JAKAJ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion to correct the presentence report was a successive motion for relief from judgment, which is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

D AVIS 

### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Belknap

No. 7616

#### Roger Beaudoin v. William V. Zaccardo *& a.*

March 31, 1977

*Normandin, Cheney & O’Neil,*of Laconia, and *David O. Huot (Mr. Huot*orally) for the plaintiff.

*Craig, Wenners, Craig & McDowell,*of Manchester, and *Vincent A. Wenners, Jr. (Mr. Joseph F. McDowell III*orally) for the defendants.

Per curiam.

This is an action for labor, services, and materials brought by Roger Beaudoin, the plaintiff, against Pauline Zaccardo and William Zaccardo, the defendants. The defendants filed a counterclaim for unfinished and unworkmanlike performance by plaintiff.

*274William Zaccardo contacted Beaudoin in May 1972, and asked him whether he would be interested in constructing a dwelling. At this time Zaccardo did not own property upon which to build the dwelling. Beaudoin indicated his interest and after several discussions, Beaudoin agreed to build a “shell” (with the weekend aid of William Zaccardo) based on a “ballpark figure” of $7,000. There was no written contract. There was a delay in beginning construction due to difficulty in acquiring the deed to land being purchased but the plaintiff was able to begin work in late August. The defendants made several payments totalling $8,000, but then refused to pay further unless certain work was done. The defendants discharged the plaintiff in November 1972. A trial was held before a Master *(Leonard C. Hardwiclc,*Esq.) resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $4,192.50, less the sum of $500 found by the master to be allowed for defective or unworkmanlike construction.

The issue presented is whether the evidence warranted the master’s findings. This court finds it does so.

Because there was evidence supporting the existence of an agreement, its disputed terms could be determined by the master as the trier of fact. *Folsom v. Plumer,*43 N.H. 469 (1862). There was evidence that the defendants wanted the dwelling to be built as cheaply as possible and that the defendant was to help on the weekends. There was also evidence that the delay in receiving the deed made it more difficult to secure cheap ready labor. There was also evidence that the plaintiff constructed an enclosed dwelling, that the charges for materials were reasonable and that the defendants were entitled to some deduction due to unworkmanlike performance.

“When, as here, there is a conflict in the evidence, the existence and terms of the contract are questions to be resolved by the trier of facts who may accept or reject in whole or in part any testimony of the parties.” *O’Donnell v. Cray,*109 N.H. 223, 225, 248 A.2d 83, 84 (1968); *Spectrum Enterprises, Inc. v. Helm Corp.,*114 N.H. 773, 329 A.2d 144 (1974).

 The question of damages was properly considered by the master in making a determination of reasonableness. Substantial, if not actual, performance occurred justifying recovery. *R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc.,*116 N.H. 760, 367 A.2d 583*275(1976); *Britton v. Turner,*6 N.H. 481 (1834); 5 A. Corbin, Contracts § 1109 (1964).

*Exceptions overruled.*

Grimes, J., did not sit.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,197

EX PARTE ANSON VERNON MOORE, II, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-17910 IN THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BROWN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while

intoxicated and sentenced to fifty (50) years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Moore v. State, No. 11-05-00393-CR, (Tex. App.– Eastland, 2008, pet.

dism’d) (not designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his

conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of hisright to petition for discretionary review
2

pro se.

The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending the relief

be granted. We agree. We find that Applicant has been deprived of his right to petition for

discretionary appeal pro se. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Applicant is

therefore entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the

judgment of the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 11-05-00393-CR that affirmed his

conviction in Case No. CR-17910 from the 35thJudicial District Court of Brown County. Applicant

shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Eleventh Court of Appeals within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: August 19, 2009

Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7274

DAWN DEMPSY SUTTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GARY L. WINKLER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-03-847-5-H)

Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dawn Dempsey Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dawn Dempsey Sutton, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Sutton v. Winkler, No. CA-03-847-5-H (E.D.N.C.

Apr. 22 & June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Washtenaw County Board Of Commissioners 

220 NORTH MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 8645 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48107-8645 

(734 )996-3055 

FAX (734)994-2592 

April 21 , 2015 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Thank you for your fine work on behalf of our nation and its citizens. As you know, U.S. 

Open Skies policy has been a great benefit to the health of the American airline industry and 

economy. These agreements have created and sustained millions of jobs and helped spur 

commercial and economic growth across our country. That is why it was disappointing to learn 

that three airlines in the Gulf states-Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline-are 

r~ceiving billions of dollars in subsidies from the governments of Qatar and the United Arab 

Emirates (UAE), a violation of the Open Skies policy. 

Though we have yet to see the full trickle-down effect this will have on the industry and 

the cities ·that are home to airports and businesses, the wiiting is on the wall. The massive 

subsidies the three Gulf carriers have re~ived from their governments have enabled them to 

expand:rapidiy, whereas U.S. carriers have experienced a decrease in market share because of 

their inability as a private entity to compete with carriers backed by their governments. This is 

highlY eoncernirig considering that every flight that is lost by a u.s~ carrier results in an average 

neHoss· of 821 U.S~ jobs. If the competitive imbalance in this situation continues, jobs will be 

lost and it will be detrimental to Washtenaw's local economy. 

I know that you are more than aware that America needs the strongest policies enforced 

for the country to remain competitive in a tenuous global economy. ·The Open Skies 

agreements have eliminated market distortions and provided a level playing field for carriers 

that 'operate within the United States for over 30 years. This must continue, which is why I ask 

that you to open ·consultations ·With Qatar and the ·UAE in regards to.this·_matter.· . . . . . 

Let's u_phold Open S~ies and do what's right; for Washt~naw County and the ~untry. 

,·. 

s 10-150501-007 
Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners 

220 North Main Street, P.O. Box 8645 

Ann Arbor, Ml 48107 

510-150501-007 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey AVE SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

iii IIi i ji 11 i l ij l i l ij l i iill 1 iii iii I "l'l iIi 'I i,, iijilt iii Iii d l iii 

)
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00057-CV

REXEL USA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

PERRY BUILDING & DESIGN, LLC 

D/B/A PERRY CONSTRUCTION, 

BRIAN MUNSON, LISA SHANNON 

AND CHRIS HORNER,

Appellees

From the 335th District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 30589

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal was referred to mediation by this Court on February 9, 2024. The 

appeal and all the appellate timetables were suspended until the receipt of the mediator’s 

report. No mediator’s report has been filed. 

However, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal was filed on March 21, 

2024. In the motion, the parties note that appellant no longer desires to pursue any 
Rexel USA, Inc. v. Perry Bldg. & Dsgn., LLC, et al. Page 2

portion of its appeal against the appellees and agree that all costs and attorney’s fees 

should be taxed against and borne by the party incurring same.

Accordingly, after consideration of the parties’ motion, the Court lifts the 

suspension of the appeal and grants the parties’ Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal filed 

on March 21, 2024. Further, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, all costs and attorney’s 

fees in this appeal are ordered taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(1), (d).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith 

Suspension lifted

Motion granted

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 28, 2024

[CV06]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2007 ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  January 23, 2007
    /s/ John H. RexfordJohn H. Rexford,Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.