alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 158.210 Ports and terminals loading crude oil. The reception facility for a crude oil loading port or terminal must have the capacity for receiving— ( a ) Oil residue from on-board fuel and lubricating oil processing in the amount of 10 metric tons (11 short tons);
( b ) Bilge water containing oily mixtures in the amount of 10 metric tons (11 short tons) or 2 metric tons (2.2 short tons) multiplied by the daily vessel average, whichever quantity is greater; and
( c ) Ballast water containing oily mixtures in the amount of 30% of the deadweight tonnage of the largest of the oceangoing tankers loading crude oil at the port or terminal that do not have clean ballast tanks (CBT), segregated ballast tanks (SBT), or crude oil washing (COW) meeting part 157 of this subchapter, multiplied by one or the daily vessel average, whichever quantity is greater.
[CGD 78-035, 50 FR 36793, Sept. 9, 1985, as amended by CGD 85-010, 52 FR 7764, Mar. 12, 1987; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55574, Nov. 2, 2001]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.307 Miami River, North Fork.

The draw of the FDOT Railroad Bridge, mile 5.3 at Miami, shall open on signal if at least 48-hour notice is given to CSX System Operating Headquarters (800) 232-0144.

[CGD07-03-088, 69 FR 9549, Mar. 1, 2004]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7051

EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-142-3-17BC)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Reliford v. Moore, No. CA-98-142-3-17BC (D.S.C. June 5 &

July 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered June 6, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00619 - CV IN RE STAFF CARE, IN C., Relator O riginal Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11 - 03615



### O RDER Before the Court is relator’s May 31, 2016 petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests real parties in interest and respondent file their responses, if any, to the petition on or before June 21, 2016
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
§ 93.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $10,000 and $100,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
§ 160.210 Methods for submitting an NOA. ( a ) *National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC).* Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph or paragraph (b) of this section, vessels must submit NOA information required by § 160.206 to the NVMC using methods currently specified at *www.nvmc.uscg.gov ,* which includes submission through the NVMC electronic Notice of Arrival and Departure (eNOAD) World Wide Web site, and XML, which includes the Excel Workbook format. These data may also be submitted using other methods that may be added as future options on *www.nvmc.uscg.gov .* XML spreadsheets may be submitted via email to *enoad@nvmc.uscg.gov .* If a vessel operator must submit an NOA or an update, for a vessel in an area without internet access or when experiencing technical difficulties with an onboard computer, and he or she has no shore-side support available, the vessel operator may fax or phone the submission to the NVMC. Fax at 1-800-547-8724 or 304-264-2684. Workbook available at *www.nvmc.uscg.gov ;* or, telephone at 1-800-708-9823 or 304-264-2502.
( b ) *Saint Lawrence Seaway.* Those vessels transiting the Saint Lawrence Seaway inbound, bound for a port or place in the United States, may meet the submission requirements of paragraph (a) of this section by submitting the required information to the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation and the Saint Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation of Canada using methods specified at *www.nvmc.uscg.gov .*
[USCG-2005-21869, 80 FR 5333, Jan. 30, 2015]
AgeOptions

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year sustainability 

grant are to:

• Significantly increase the number of older 

adults and older adults with disabilities at 

risk for falls who participate in evidencebased community programs to reduce 

falls and falls risks; and

• Implement innovative funding 

arrangements to support the proposed 

programs, while embedding the 

programs into an integrated, sustainable 

program network. 

AgeOptions and its partners will: 

• Increase the existing capacity of current 

providers to offer A Matter of Balance 

(MOB) statewide and build a statewide 

delivery system for Tai Chi for Arthritis 

and Falls Prevention and Healthy Steps in 

Motion. 

• Strengthen the Illinois Pathways to 

Health hub infrastructure and delivery 

system.

• Achieve financial sustainability through 

four healthcare contracts.

Proposed Interventions

• A Matter of Balance

• Healthy Steps in Motion

• Tai Chi for Arthritis and Falls Prevention

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, AgeOptions will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Rush System for Health and Rush 

University Medical Center 

• White Crane Wellness Center

• Illinois’ Area Agencies on Aging

• Illinois Department on Aging, Care 

Coordination Units and Medicaid 

Managed Care Providers

• Humana

• BlueCross and BlueShield of Illinois

• Oak Street Health

Anticipated Results 

AgeOptions and its partners propose to achieve 

the following results: 

• Reach 4,933 program participants with 

3,700 completing one of the three 

programs.
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

• The Illinois Department on Aging, Care 

Coordination Units and Medicaid 

Managed Care Providers will refer 

appropriate Community Care Program 

(Medicaid waiver) participants who have 

experienced a reportable critical fall 

event to Illinois Pathways to Health.

• Increased awareness of falls prevention 

programming (as measured by number of 

brochures distributed, website hits, 

Facebook views).

• A sustainable statewide program with 

contracts from at least four organizations 

and at least 80% of delivery partners 

stating that they will continue to offer 

programming after the grant ends.

• Improved network ability to deliver under 

a healthcare contract (as evidenced by an 

increase of at least 4 delivery partners 

that are HIPAA compliant).

Contact:

Robert Mapes, Project Director, Director of 

Program and Community Support

AgeOptions

Robert.Mapes@ageoptions.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
#### Keller *v.*Bowen & Thomas.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided February 14, 1907.

Injunction, etc. Before Judge Parker. Glynn superior court. June 14, 1906.

Beck, J.

Under the pleadings and evidence, the court committed no error in granting the injunction and appointing the receiver as prayed. The m'aterial facts being substantially the same as those involved in *Bell*v. *Dawson Grocery Co.,*120 *Ga.*628, the rulings there made are controlling in the present case. ,

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*

*585Bowen & Thomas filed an equitable petition to restrain Keller from receiving from the trustee in bankruptcy property set apart to him as a homestead exemption in the court of bankruptcy, and prayed that a receiver be appointed to take charge'of it “for the benefit of petitioners and other creditors of the said defendant, in the same class with petitioners,” and for a judgment -in rem against the property. It appears, from the pleadings, that on February 6, 1906, Keller executed and delivered to the petitioners a promissory note for $408.90 principal, containing a waiver of the rights to homestead and exemptions under the laws of Georgia and the United States; that on May 3, 1906, he filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the district court of the United States, and that the trustee in bankruptcy set apart to him, as a homestead exemption, property of the value of $1,600, consisting of personal property valued at $50, and $1,550 in cash; that the plaintiffs had not proved their claim in the court of bankruptcy, and the defendant having been adjudicated a bankrupt, they could not bring a common-law action against him, and their only remedy was in a court of equity, in which they could secure a decree and judgment binding the homestead property, and have the property taken in charge by a receiver, so that it could not be disposed of by the defendant. The defendant filed a general demurrer, on the grounds, that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the cause, and that the petition set out no cause of action, and no ground for equitable relief. In his answer the defendant alleged, that there were other outstanding notes'against him, containing waiver of homestead rights, that “to allow the claim of petitioners to be paid out of said homestead fund to the exclusion of the others of said homestead notes of equal dignity . . would be . . inequitable,” and that he “is now prepared, as he has been at all times, and desires to carry out his said purpose and intention to have said fund applied pro rata to the payment of said homestead-waiver notes,” etc. On the hearing the court passed an order granting each of the prayers of the petition, and directing that the receiver “safely keep the said homestead property and estate subject to the further order of this court.” The defendant excepted.

*Bennet & Conyers,*for plaintiff in error. *D. W. Krauss,*contra.
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act:

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: Florida Department of Elder Affairs 

Name of ADRCs and Healthcare Partners: 

Senior Resource Alliance and Florida Hospital’s Orlando, Winter Park, East Orlando, Altamonte 

Springs, Celebration, and Kissimmee facilities. 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Sandi Smith 

 850-414-2139 

 Smithsl@elderaffairs.org

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Care Transitions InterventionSM

Project Summary: 

The Florida Department of Elder Affairs, the designated State Unit on Aging, proposes to 

employ grant funding to expand the existing Evidence-Based Care Transitions Intervention 

(CTI) model of E.A. Coleman, MD, MPH, and associates, in Planning and Service Area (PSA) 7 

(Metro Orlando and surrounding areas). The project will operate in Orange, Osceola and 

Seminole counties. Key project partners will be the Senior Resource Alliance, the designated 

PSA 7 Area Agency on Aging and ADRC, and Florida Hospital. The Alliance administers the 

current CTI program in three Florida Hospital community facilities. 

Goal/Objectives: 

The goal of the proposed project is to expand program services to three additional facilities, for a 

total of six project sites. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

The project outcome is to demonstrate the capacity of the CTI project to reduce the incidence of 

re-hospitalizations of project patients as compared with Florida Hospital discharges of patients 

who do not participate in the project. Project objectives are producing key grant deliverables, 

ensuring program quality, effectively using ADRC assets, increasing CTI effectiveness through 

home and community-based services and expanding the project to new sites. The project targets 

Medicare patients age 60 and older identified as most at risk of hospital readmission. The 

current CTI program and proposed project supplement CTI model services with the provision of 

home and community-based services to support elders in their homes during a 30-day recovery 

period without the need to meet financial eligibility requirements or service availability/waitinglist issues. The project’s planned output for the two-year grant period is 720 enrollments. 

Project products will include an evaluation plan, formal evaluation tools, improved project 

database and semi-annual/final reports.
Exhibit


32.1








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
      R. Lefevre, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              December 7, 2007
            By:
            /s/ George R. LefevreGeorge
              R. Lefevre, CEO




34
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1198 Safety zone; Military Ocean Terminal Concord Safety Zone, Suisun Bay, Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA. ( a ) *Location.* This safety zone is established in the navigable waters of Suisun Bay near Military Ocean Terminal Concord, CA (MOTCO) as depicted in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18656. Upon commencement of military onloads and offloads, the safety zone will encompass the navigable waters in the area between 500 yards of MOTCO Pier 2 in position 38°03′30′′ N, 122°01′14′′ W (NAD 83) as depicted in National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18656 (the perimeter of the existing security zone) and 3,000 yards of the pier.
( b ) *Enforcement period.* The zone described in paragraph (a) of this section will be enforced during all military onload and offload operations. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify the maritime community of periods during which this zone will be enforced via actual notice on-scene during military onloads and offloads.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) The safety zone is open to all persons and vessels for transitory use.
( 2 ) Persons and vessels operating within the safety zone may not anchor or otherwise loiter within the safety zone.
( 3 ) Vessel operators desiring to anchor or otherwise loiter within the safety zone must contact Sector San Francisco Vessel Traffic Service at (415) 556-2760 or VHF Channel 14 to obtain permission.
( 4 ) All persons and vessels transiting through or operating within the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP or a designated representative.
( 5 ) The public can contact Sector San Francisco Bay at (415) 399-3530 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule.
( d ) *Enforcement.* All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the COTP or the designated on-scene patrol personnel. Patrol personnel comprise commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard onboard Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by local law enforcement and the MOTCO police as necessary. Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel must proceed as directed.
[USCG-2012-1008, 78 FR 5720, Jan. 28, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.531 How many fire pumps must be kept ready for use at all times?

At least one of the fire pumps required by this subchapter must be kept ready for use at all times.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

BERNARD MENSAH, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,

 Defendant.

______________________________________/

CLASS ACTION

Case No. 1:22-cv-21681-JAL

 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Bernard Mensah, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), does 

hereby dismiss this action as follows:

1. All claims of the Plaintiff, Bernard Mensah, individually, are hereby dismissed 

without prejudice.

2. All claims of any unnamed member of the alleged class are hereby dismissed 

without prejudice. 

Date: August 03, 2022

Respectfully Submitted,

Shamis & Gentile, P.A.

/s/ Andrew J. Shamis

Andrew J. Shamis, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 101754

ashamis@shamisgentile.com

14 NE 1st Avenue, Suite 705

Miami, FL 33132

Telephone: 305-479-2299

Counsel for Plaintiff and the Class

Case 1:22-cv-21681-JAL Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2022 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 03, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on all counsel identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner.

Respectfully submitted,

SHAMIS & GENTILE, P.A.

14 NE 1st Ave., Suite 705

Miami, FL 33132

Telephone (305) 479-2299

Facsimile (786) 623-0915

 Email: efilings@sflinjuryattorneys.com

By: /s/ Andrew J. Shamis

Andrew J. Shamis, Esq.

Florida Bar # 101754

Counsel for Plaintiff and the Class

Case 1:22-cv-21681-JAL Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2022 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.160 Tanks: Ballasting and crude oil washing. ( a ) The owner, operator, and master of a tank vessel under § 157.10(e) shall ensure that: ( 1 ) Ballast water is carried in a cargo tank only as allowed under § 157.35;
( 2 ) For oil cargo residue control, at least 25 percent of the cargo tanks are crude oil washed before each ballast voyage and that each cargo tank is crude oil washed at least once every fourth time crude oil is discharged from the tank, but no tank need be crude oil washed more than once during each 120 day period;
( 3 ) Ballast water in a cargo tank that is crude oil washed but not water rinsed during or after the most recent discharge of crude oil from that tank is discharged in accordance with § 157.37(a); and
( 4 ) Cargo tanks are not crude oil washed during a ballast voyage.
( b ) The owner, operator, and master of a tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10a(a)(2) or § 157.10c(b)(2) shall ensure that— ( 1 ) Ballast water is carried only in a cargo tank that is crude oil washed during or after the most recent discharge of crude oil from that tank;
( 2 ) Before each ballast voyage a sufficient number of cargo tanks have been crude oil washed during or after the most recent discharge of crude oil from those tanks to allow ballast water to be carried in cargo tanks: ( i ) With a total capacity to meet the draft and trim requirements in § 157.10a(d); and
( ii ) For the vessel's trading pattern and expected weather conditions;
( 3 ) For oil cargo residue control, at least 25 percent of the cargo tanks not used for carrying ballast water under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section are crude oil washed before each ballast voyage, and that each cargo tank is crude oil washed at least once every fourth time crude oil is discharged from the tank, but no tank need be crude oil washed more than once during each 120 day period;
( 4 ) Cargo tanks are not crude oil washed during a ballast voyage; and
( 5 ) Ballast water in a cargo tank that is crude oil washed but not water rinsed during or after the most recent discharge of crude oil from that tank is discharged in accordance with § 157.37(a).
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43709, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11628, Mar. 22, 1985; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]