Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 6, 2000 / Notices 35971

product, or undertake an objective

examination of all relevant evidence;

further, the Government of Japan alleges

that the captive production provision

itself, section 771(7)(c)(iv) of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended, is inconsistent

with these articles of the Antidumping

Agreement.

Other allegations include:

8. The United States’ allegedly biased

approach to the investigation, including

with respect to the critical

circumstances determination, the

application of ‘‘facts available,’’ and the

determination of injury, was

inconsistent with Article X:3 of GATT

1994;

9. The above laws, regulations, and

rulings are not in conformity with

obligations under the WTO agreements,

and so are inconsistent with Article

XVI:4 of the Marrakesh Agreement and

Article 18.4 of the Antidumping

Agreement.

Public Comment: Requirements for

Submissions

Interested persons are invited to

submit written comments concerning

the issues raised in this dispute.

Comments must be in English and

provided in fifteen copies to Sandy

McKinzy at the address provided above.

A person requesting that information

contained in a comment submitted by

that person be treated as confidential

business information must certify that

such information is business

confidential and would not customarily

be released to the public by the

submitting person. Confidential

business information must be clearly

marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’

in a contrasting color ink at the top of

each page of each copy.

Information or advice contained in a

comment submitted, other than business

confidential information, may be

determined by USTR to be confidential

in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of

the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.

2155(g)(2)). If the submitting person

believes that information or advice may

qualify as such, the submitting person—

(1) Must so designate the information

or advice;

(2) Must clearly mark the material as

‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ in a

contrasting color ink at the top of each

page of each copy; and

(3) Is encouraged to provide a nonconfidential summary of the

information or advice. Pursuant to

section 127(e) of the URAA (19 U.S.C.

3537(e)), USTR will maintain a file on

this dispute settlement proceeding,

accessible to the public, in the USTR

Reading Room: Room 101, Office of the

United States Trade Representative, 600

17th Street, NW., Washington, DC

20508. The public file will include a

listing of any comments received by

USTR from the public with respect to

the proceeding, the U.S. submissions to

the panel in the proceeding, the

submissions, or non-confidential

summaries of submissions, to the panel

received from other parties in the

dispute, as well as the report of the

dispute settlement panel, and, if

applicable, the report of the Appellate

Body. An appointment to review the

public file (Docket WTO/DS–184, ‘‘HotRolled Steel Products—Japan’’) may be

made by calling Brenda Webb, (202)

395–6186. The Reading Room is open to

the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon

and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through

Friday.

A. Jane Bradley,

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for

Monitoring and Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 00–14208 Filed 6–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Notice of Application for Approval of

Discontinuance or Modification of a

Railroad Signal System or Relief From

the Requirements of Title 49 Code of

Federal Regulations Part 236

Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49

U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroads

have petitioned the Federal Railroad

Administration (FRA) seeking approval

for the discontinuance or modification

of the signal system or relief from the

requirements of 49 CFR Part 236 as

detailed below.

[Docket No. FRA-2000–6924]

Applicant: CSX Transportation,

Incorporated, Mr. E.G. Peterson,

Assistant Chief Engineer, Design and

Construction, 4901 Belfort Road, Suite

130 (S/C J–350), Jacksonville, Florida

32256.

CSX Transportation Incorporated

seeks approval of the proposed

discontinuance and removal of the

manual block system (DCS Operating

Rules), on the single secondary track,

between Swamp, milepost 0.0 and

Wharf, milepost 12.0, near Fall River,

Massachusetts, Fall River Subdivision,

Albany Service Lane, and redesignation

of the secondary track to an industrial

track.

The reason given for the proposed

changes is that density of traffic no

longer warrants this type of train

operation.

Any interested party desiring to

protest the granting of an application

shall set forth specifically the grounds

upon which the protest is made, and

contain a concise statement of the

interest of the Protestant in the

proceeding. Additionally, one copy of

the protest shall be furnished to the

applicant at the address listed above.

All communications concerning this

proceeding should be identified by the

docket number and must be submitted

to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket

Management Facility, Room PI–401,

Washington, DC 20590–0001.

Communications received within 45

days of the date of this notice will be

considered by the FRA before final

action is taken. Comments received after

that date will be considered as far as

practicable. All written communications

concerning these proceedings are

available for examination during regular

business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at DOT

Central Docket Management Facility,

Room PI–401 (Plaza Level), 400 Seventh

Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590–

0001. All documents in the public

docket are also available for inspection

and copying on the internet at the

docket facility’s Web site at http://

dms.dot.gov.

FRA expects to be able to determine

these matters without an oral hearing.

However, if a specific request for an oral

hearing is accompanied by a showing

that the party is unable to adequately

present his or her position by written

statements, an application may be set

for public hearing.

Issued in Washington, DC on May 25,

2000.

Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety

Standards and Program Development.

[FR Doc. 00–14055 Filed 6–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Emergency Medical Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision.

SUMMARY: This notice is issued pursuant

to the Aviation Medical Assistance Act

of 1998, which requires the Federal

Aviation Administration to determine

whether or not to require automatic

external defibrillators at airports. To

carry out this mandate, the agency

reviewed data on the medical capability

at the airports most used by passengers

to respond to cardiac events. Based