alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 151.59 Placards. ( a ) The master or person in charge of a ship, including a drilling rig or platform, to which this section applies shall ensure that one or more placards meeting the requirements of this section are displayed in prominent locations and in sufficient numbers so that they can be read by the crew and passengers. These locations must be readily accessible to the intended reader and may include embarkation points, food service facilities, garbage handling spaces, living spaces, and common areas on deck. If the Captain of the Port (COTP) determines that the number or location of the placards is insufficient to adequately inform crew and passengers, the COTP may require additional placards and may specify their locations.
( b ) Each placard must be at least 20 cm (8 in) wide by 121 ⁄ 2 cm (5 in) high, made of a durable material, and legible.
( c ) At a minimum, each placard must notify the reader of the operating requirements contained in §§ 151.67 through 151.73 as they apply to that ship. The following requirements should also be prominently stated: ( 1 ) The discharge of all garbage is prohibited into the navigable waters of the United States and into all other waters except as specifically allowed;
( 2 ) The discharge of all forms of plastic into all waters is prohibited;
( 3 ) A person who violates the above requirements is liable for civil and/or criminal penalties; and
( 4 ) Regional, state, and local restrictions on garbage discharges also may apply.
( d ) For ships while operating on the Great Lakes or their connecting or tributary waters, the placard must— ( 1 ) Notify the reader of the information in paragraph (c) of this section; or
( 2 ) Notify the reader of the following: ( i ) Except as allowed by § 151.66, the discharge of all garbage into the Great Lakes or their connecting or tributary waters is prohibited; and
( ii ) A person who violates the above requirements is liable for a civil penalty for each violation, and the criminal penalties of a class D felony.
[USCG-2012-1049, 78 FR 13492, Feb. 28, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1182 Safety/Security Zone: San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay, CA. ( a ) *Regulated area.* The following area is established as a moving safety/security zone: ( 1 ) All waters 200 yards ahead and astern and 100 yards to each side of every vessel transporting nuclear materials on behalf of the United States Department of Energy while such vessels transit from a line drawn between San Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Bell Buoy 7 and San Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 8 (LLNR 4190 & 4195, positions 37°46.9′ N, 122°35.4′ W & 37°46.5′ N, 122°35.2′ W, respectively) until safely moored at the Weapons Support Facility Seal Beach Detachment Concord on Suisun Bay (position 38°03.3′ N, 122°02.5′ W). All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD 1983.
( 2 ) All waters within 100 yards of such vessels described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section while such vessels are conducting cargo operations at the Weapons Support Facility Seal Beach Detachment Concord.
( b ) *Notification.* Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District, will cause notice of the activation of this safety/security zone to be made by all appropriate means to effect the widest publicity among the affected segments of the public, including publication in the Federal Register as practicable, in accordance with the provisions of 33 CFR 165.7(a); such means of announcement may include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the public when nuclear materials cargo handling has been completed.
( c ) *Effective Period.* The safety/security zone will be effective commencing at the time any vessel described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section enters the zone described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and will remain in effect until all spent nuclear materials cargo handling operations have been completed at Weapons Support Facility Seal Beach Detachment Concord.
( d ) *Regulations.* The general regulations governing safety and security zones contained in both 33 CFR 165.23 in 33 CFR 165.33 apply. Entry into, transit through, or anchoring within this moving safety/security zone is prohibited unless authorized by Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District, or his designated representative.
[CGD11-98-005, 63 FR 38754, July 20, 1998. Redesignated by USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33642, June 25, 2001; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44287, July 27, 2015]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                    K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended                   Nine Months Ended
                                                     ------------------                   -----------------
                                                 Sept. 27,         Sept. 28,         Sept. 27,         Sept. 28,
                                                   1997              1996              1997              1996
                                                   ----              ----              ----              ----
<S>                                             <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
AVERAGE COMMON AND
 COMMON-EQUIVALENT
 SHARES:

 Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding per Period                  3,170,000         3,127,000         3,150,000         3,117,000

Stock Options                                       57,000            11,000            57,000            11,000
                                                ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------

ADJUSTED AVERAGE COMMON
AND COMMON-EQUIVALENT
SHARES COMPUTATION                               3,227,000         3,138,000         3,207,000         3,128,000
                                                ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

EARNINGS FOR COMMON
AND COMMON-EQUIVALENT
SHARES COMPUTATION:

Net income applicable to Common
 Stock                                          $1,461,000        $1,161,000        $3,763,000        $2,841,000
                                                ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

EARNINGS PER SHARE                              $      .45        $      .37        $     1.17        $      .91
                                                ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========
</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.755 Safety Zone; Guayanilla, Puerto Rico. ( a ) The following area is established as a safety zone during the specified conditions: ( 1 ) A 100 yard radius surrounding a vessel carrying Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) while transiting north of Latitude 17°56.0′ N in the waters of the Caribbean Sea, on approach to or departure from the Eco-Electrica waterfront facility in Guayanilla Bay, Puerto Rico. The safety zone remains in effect until the LNG vessel is docked at the Eco-Electrica waterfront facility or south of Latitude 17°56.0′ N.
( 2 ) The waters within 150 feet of a LNG vessel when the vessel is alongside the Eco-Electrica waterfront facility in Guayanilla Bay, at position 17°58.55′ N, 066°45.3′ W. This safety zone remains in effect while the LNG vessel is docked with product aboard or is transferring LNG.
( b ) In accordance with the general regulations in 165.23 of this part, anchoring, mooring or transiting in these zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port.
( c ) Coast Guard Sector San Juan will notify the maritime community of periods during which the safety zones will be in effect by providing advance notice of scheduled arrivals and departures of LNG vessels via a marine broadcast Notice to Mariners.
[COTP San Juan 00-095, 66 FR 16870, Mar. 28, 2001, as amended by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35017, June 19, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.12 Regulations for certification of existing devices. ( a ) The purpose of this section is to provide regulations for certification of existing devices until manufacturers can design and manufacture devices that comply with this part and recognized facilities are prepared to perform the testing required by this part.
( b ) Any Type III device that was installed on an existing vessel before January 30, 1975, is considered certified.
( c ) Any person may apply to the Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430 for certification of a marine sanitation device manufactured before January 30, 1976. The Coast Guard will issue a letter certifying the device if the applicant shows that the device meets § 159.53 by: ( 1 ) Evidence that the device meets State standards at least equal to the standards in § 159.53, or
( 2 ) Test conducted under this part by a recognized laboratory, or
( 3 ) Evidence that the device is substantially equivalent to a device certified under this section, or
( 4 ) A Coast Guard field test if considered necessary by the Coast Guard.
( d ) The Coast Guard will maintain and make available a list that identifies each device certified under this section.
( e ) Devices certified under this section in compliance with § 159.53 need not meet the other regulations in this part and may not be labeled under § 159.16.
[CGD 73-83, 40 FR 4624, Jan. 30, 1975, as amended by CGD 75-213, 41 FR 15325, Apr. 12, 1976; CGD 82-063a, 48 FR 4776, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25122, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33668, June 28, 1996; USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33641, June 25, 2001; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36286, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38439, July 7, 2014; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35083, July 28, 2017]
#### § 785.23 Employees residing on employer's premises or working at home.

An employee who resides on his employer's premises on a permanent basis or for extended periods of time is not considered as working all the time he is on the premises. Ordinarily, he may engage in normal private pursuits and thus have enough time for eating, sleeping, entertaining, and other periods of complete freedom from all duties when he may leave the premises for purposes of his own. It is, of course, difficult to determine the exact hours worked under these circumstances and any reasonable agreement of the parties which takes into consideration all of the pertinent facts will be accepted. This rule would apply, for example, to the pumper of a stripper well who resides on the premises of his employer and also to a telephone operator who has the switchboard in her own home. (*Skelly Oil Co.* v. *Jackson,* 194 Okla. 183, 148 P. 2d 182 (Okla. Sup. Ct. 1944; *Thompson* v. *Loring Oil Co.,* 50 F. Supp. 213 (W.D. La. 1943).)
#### OHIO TRACTION CO. et v. McGIE

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.

No. 3584.

Decided Feb. 24, 1930

James G. Stewart, Cincinnati, for Traction Co.

Froome Morris, Cincinnati, for McGie.

CUSHING, P.J.

The chief complaint of counsel for plaintiffs in error, concerning this charge, is, that it does not contain the language “such as a reasonably prudent person would do under the same or similar circumstances.” This phrase is merely explanatory of the term “ordinary care.”

Our conclusion is that the giving of this special'charge did not constitute prejudicial error.

The other assignment of error is, that, the verdict is excessive, and is based on the theory that the amount of the verdict was in excess of the amount that it would require to compensate the plaintiff for the loss of his earning capacity.

The court submitted to the jury the following measures of damage, damages to his machinery, expenses-in removing the machinery, expenses for hospital and medical treatment, wages lost, effect on future earning capacity, and pain and suffering. The damages to his machinery, removal of the wreckage, and medical expenses above referred to amounted to something over five thousand dollars, and the argument of counsel is that the remainder of the verdict was given as the basis for loss of earning capacity in the future. Whatever that loss may be, all that need be said in this case is, that neither in the brief nor in oral argument did counsel allow anything for pain and suffering.

There were no interrogatories submitted to the jury, by which it could be determined how much was allowed for loss of earning capacity, or how much was allowed for pain and suffering, and in the absence of special interrogatories, there is no way for this court to determine on what the jury based its verdict.

The judgment of the court of common pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, will be, and it is, affirmed.

ROSS & HAMILTON, J.J., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.416 What are the requirements for a dry chemical fire suppression system?

Each natural gas deepwater port must be equipped with a dry chemical system that meets the requirements of § 127.609 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT “1”

Case 0:22-cv-61548-RKA Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN ADMIRALTY

CASE NO.: 0:22-cv-61548-RKA

BROWARD SHIPYARD, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

M/Y SMILING DOG, a 1991 model 105-foot

Chediek motor yacht registered in the

Cayman Islands as Official Number 748072,

its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and 

appurtenances, including a 17-foot Boston Whaler

tender, in rem, and SMILING DOG LTD., 

a Cayman Islands company, in personam,

Defendants.

____________________________________________/

ORDER DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE

OF THE WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM

Pursuant to Supplemental Admiralty Rule (C)(3)(a)(i) and Local Admiralty 

Rule C, the Clerk is directed to issue a warrant of arrest in rem in the above-styled 

action against the in rem Defendant, M/Y Smiling Dog, a 1991 105-foot Chediek 

Motor Yacht registered in the Cayman Islands as Official Number 748072, its

engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, including a 17-foot Boston 

Whaler tender.

DONE AND ORDERED at Miami, Florida, this _____ day of August, 2022.

_____________________________________

ROY K. ALTMAN

United States District Court Judge

Case 0:22-cv-61548-RKA Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 2 of 3
2

Copy furnished to: 

Farris J. Martin III, Esq.

James W. Stroup, Esq.

Stroup & Martin, P.A.

119 S.E. 12th Street

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316

fmartin@strouplaw.com

jstroup@strouplaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Broward Shipyard, Inc.

Case 0:22-cv-61548-RKA Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 3 of 3
What’s the Difference?

Between a Registered Dietitian 

and a Nutritionist

Task Registered Dietitian Nutritionist

Board-certified food and nutrition 

expert.

Yes Maybe. Some states do not regulate 

the term nutritionist and therefore, 

anyone could call themselves a 

nutritionist - It is recommended 

to check your states regulations 

of the title.

Educated in the science of food, 

nutrition, and the impact on 

human health.

Yes In some states, an individual must 

obtain certain qualifications 

before calling oneself a 

nutritionist.

From training, able to provide 

evidence-based Medical Nutrition 

Therapy and nutrition counseling 

to meet individual needs.

Yes No

Qualified to practice in hospitals, 

outpatient clinics, research 

institutions, communities, and 

more.

Yes No

Must meet criteria from governing 

bodies (Academy of Nutrition and 

Dietetics, and the Commission on 

Dietetic Registration).

Yes. To earn the credentials 

Registered Dietitian (RD)/

Registered Dietitian 

Nutritionist (RDN), the 

individual must obtain 

qualifications. 

Maybe. Some states do not regulate 

the stand-alone term nutritionist 

and therefore, anyone could call 

themselves a nutritionist - It is 

recommended to check your 

states regulations of the title.

Holds an undergraduate science 

degree, having completed courses 

in biology, microbiology, organic 

and inorganic chemistry (in 

2024, a masters degree will be 

required) in which the individual 

will complete courses in biology, 

microbiology, organic and 

inorganic chemistry.

Yes Not necessarily.

Can manage nutrition across a 

span of health conditions.

Yes No

The titles Registered Dietitian (RD) and Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) mean the same thing.

Resources: 

Check your states regulations of the title

Every Registered Dietitian Is a Nutritionist, but Not Every Nutritionist is a Registered Dietitian

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Commission on Dietetic Registration

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and 

Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their 

findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
1:22-mj-02928 Damian

Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 1 of 25
1:22-mj-02928 Damian

Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 2 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 3 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 4 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 5 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 6 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 7 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 8 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 9 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 10 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 11 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 12 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 13 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 14 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 15 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 16 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 17 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 18 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 19 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 20 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 21 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 22 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 23 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 24 of 25
Case 1:22-mj-02928-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 25 of 25
,NG • G
th ^ ^, ^...,(n9^

THE ST ATEd^ ^ ^^y ^

OF WYOMIN*

N MATTHEW H. MEAD GOVERNOR STATE CAPITOL CHEYENNE, WY 82002 

# Office of the Governor

February 26, 2015 The Honorable Gina McCarthy United States Environmental Protection Agency Off ce of the Administrator (1101 A) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Secretary McCarthy, I request the Environmental Protection Agency schedule a public meeting in Casper, Wyoming on proposed rulemaking for 40 CFR Part 192 Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings. I also request the EPA extend the comment period for an additional 90 days. Wyoming is home to the largest supplier of domestic uranium. All of Wyoming's production is derived from the in-situ recovery process — the subject of the rule. Proposed action by the EPA is of great importance to Wyoming as is EPA's scheduling of a Washington D.C. public meeting. However, the EPA office should facilitate a hearing where commercial-scale production takes place. A Casper, Wyoming forum is much more realistic for producers, members of the workforce and affected public who have relevant information and wish to comment. Testimony from those with expertise in the process, those who live near the mining and scientific expertise are equally critical to the evaluation of the rule. My office has coordinated a review of EPA's advanced notice of proposed rulemaking with our relevant State agencies. I would be happy to work with you to set up a public meeting in Casper. Please advise me or my Policy Advisor Cameron Nazminia at (307) 777-6472 or cameron.nazminia@wyo.gov if you have any questions or if we can assist you.
Sincerely;

Matthew H. N1ead Governor MHM:md

PHONE: (307) 777-7434 FAX: (307) 632-3909
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0886 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-067-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 39 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent damage to the main rotor blades and 

subsequent loss of helicopter control.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $9,000 to replace the top table-cutter assembly

Labor per Helicopter

(1 x $85/work-hour for the 

removal)

(3 x $85/work-hour for the 

re-work)

(1 x $85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$85

$255

$85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 for the removal

$255 for the re-work 

$9,085 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
I AGE OUT LOUD BY

OLDER

AMERICANS

MONTH

AGE OUT L OUD : MAY 2017 #OAM17