alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 654 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of the Honorable 

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Member of the House of Representatives for 

the 11th Congressional District of Ohio. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. VOINOVICH, and Mr. HATCH) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of 

the Honorable Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Member of the 

House of Representatives for the 11th Congressional District of Ohio. 

Whereas Stephanie Tubbs Jones was born on September 10, 

1949, in Cleveland, Ohio, and attended Case Western Reserve University and the Franklin Thomas Backus School 

of Law; 

Whereas, in 1982, at the age of 33, Stephanie Tubbs Jones 

was elected to serve on the Cleveland Municipal Court; 

Whereas, in 1983, Stephanie Tubbs Jones became the first 

African-American woman to serve on the Court of Common Pleas in the State of Ohio; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 654 ATS 

Whereas Stephanie Tubbs Jones served as the Cuyahoga 

County Prosecutor from 1991 through 1999, becoming 

the first woman and the first African-American to hold 

the position; 

Whereas, in 1998, Stephanie Tubbs Jones was elected to the 

first of 5 terms in the House of Representatives, where 

she was a tireless advocate for the citizens of Ohio’s 11th 

Congressional District and championed increased access 

to health care, improved voting rights, and quality education for all; 

Whereas Stephanie Tubbs Jones was the first African-American woman to represent the State of Ohio in Congress; 

and 

Whereas Ohio has lost a beloved daughter and the House of 

Representatives one of its strongest voices with the passing of Stephanie Tubbs Jones on August 20, 2008: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) mourns the loss of the Honorable Stephanie 

3 Tubbs Jones and expresses its condolences to her 

4 family and friends and to the people of the 11th 

5 Congressional District of Ohio; and 

6 (2) honors the life of Stephanie Tubbs Jones, a 

7 highly esteemed and accomplished Member of Con8 gress, dedicated community leader, and tireless ad9 vocate for those in need. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 

**Subject**:Inclusion of Title VII Funds in Calculation for State Plan Administrative Costs

**Inquiry Source**:AoA Regional Offices, Several States

**Stat. & Reg.**

**Basis**:OAA Section 308(b)

**Key Words**:State Administrative Costs, Calculation, Title VII Funds

**ADDRIS Code**:

**Questions**:Is the amount allocated under the new Title VII included in the calculation of funds available for State plan administration?

**Response**:States may include Title VII allocations in the calculation of funds available for State plan administration through fiscal year 1994; but beginning on October 1, 1994, States may not include any Title VII funding in their calculation of funds available for State plan administration.

**Discussion**:There is absent any reference in the Act to Title VII allotments in calculating funding for administration of State plans.  On the other hand, it is quite clear that the Act authorizes States to allocate five percent, or $500,000, whichever is greater, of their cumulative total Title III allotments for meeting administrative costs.

When abuse prevention funding was under Part G of Title III and there was an ombudsman allotment under Title III, States were authorized to include these funds in computing the amount allowable to the State for State agency administration.  (See AoA PI-91-02, issued December 13, 1990.)  AoA believes it is reasonable to permit Title VII funds to continue to be calculated in the base for State plan administration funding through FY 1994, in order to ensure continuity and a smooth transition for the affected programs from Title III into Title VII.

The programs under Title VII, unlike most of the programs under Title III, are established and operated as direct advocacy services by the State agency on aging and/or agencies with which the State agency contracts or provides grants to operate the programs.  Thus, at least some, if not all, of the Title VII funds are used to pay direct costs for such administrative costs as staff, offices expenses, travel, etc.  Therefore, a major funding principle to which States need to adhere with regard to Title VII is that all funding allotted for a particular Title VII chapter must be used to carry out the requirements and activities specified for that chapter in the Act.  Funds allotted for FY 1995 and in subsequent years for any chapter under Title VII should not be included in the calculation for State plan administration funding.

Fernando M. Torres-GilDate

Assistant Secretary for Aging
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 544 

Designating May 5 through 9, 2008, as National Substitute Teacher 

Recognition Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2008 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. SANDERS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 5 through 9, 2008, as National Substitute 

Teacher Recognition Week. 

Whereas, on average, as much as 1 full year of a child’s elementary and secondary education is taught by substitute 

teachers; 

Whereas, on any given day in the United States, more than 

270,000 classes are taught by substitute teachers; 

Whereas formal training of substitute teachers has been 

shown to improve the quality of education, lower school 

district liability, reduce the number of student and faculty complaints, and increase retention rates of substitute 

teachers; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 544 ATS 

Whereas a strong, effective system of education for all children and youth is essential to our Nation’s continued 

strength and prosperity; 

Whereas much of a child’s growth and progress can be attributed to the efforts of dedicated teachers and substitute 

teachers who are entrusted with the child’s educational 

development; 

Whereas substitute teachers play a vital role in maintaining 

continuity of instruction and a positive learning environment in the absence of a permanent classroom teacher; 

and 

Whereas substitute teachers should be recognized for their 

dedication and commitment: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 5 through 9, 2008, as the 

3 7th annual National Substitute Teacher Recognition 

4 Week; 

5 (2) recognizes the important and vital role sub6 stitute teachers play in a child’s education; and 

7 (3) encourages educational institutions to ob8 serve the week with appropriate events and activi9 ties. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
# A-6A Fac-Beds
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**
| Parent                                 | ** ** | **Subsidiary**                         | ** ** | **Percent of Ownership** | ** ** | **State of  Incorporation or  Organization** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------|
| First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc.          | ** ** | **The  First National Bank of Ottawa** | ** ** | **100%**                 | ** ** | **National  Bank, Illinois**                 |
| **The  First National Bank of Ottawa** | ** ** | **First  Ottawa Financial Corp.**      | ** ** | **100%**                 | ** ** | **Delaware**                                 |

 

 

----
STEAM ELECTRIC REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE0 3529

This media is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made

as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 Washington, DC. 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744 Fax: 202-566- 9744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov

Final version of the steam electric sampling analytical database including all EPA sampling data and monitoring data used for development of the effluent limits and pollutant loadings.
§ 154.2106 Detonation arresters installation. This section applies only to facilities collecting vapors of flammable, combustible, or non-high flash point liquid cargoes. ( a ) Detonation arresters must be installed in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the arrester manufacturer's acceptance letter provided by the Coast Guard.
( b ) On either side of a detonation arrester, line size expansions must be in a straight pipe run and must be no closer than 120 times the pipe's diameter from the detonation arrester unless the manufacturer has test data to show the expansion can be closer.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.917 Battery Creek.

The draw of the State highway bridge, mile 2.1 between Beaufort and Parris Island, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
#### § 110.72b St. Simons Island, Georgia.

The area beginning at a point southwest of Frederica River Bridge, St. Simons Island Causeway at latitude 31°09′58′′ N., longitude 81°24′55′′ W.; thence southwesterly to latitude 31°09′42′′ N., longitude 81°25′10′′ W.; thence westerly to the shoreline at latitude 31°09′45′′ N., longitude 81°25′20′′ W.; thence northeasterly along the shoreline to latitude 31°10′02′′ N., longitude 81°25′00′′ W.; thence southeasterly to the point of origin.

[CGD 76-47, 42 FR 40694, Aug. 11, 1977]
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTAUDITORS

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements  (No. 000-30495) on Form S-8of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. ofour report dated January 17, 2003 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2002 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002, which report is incorporated by reference inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. for the yearended December 31, 2003.

 
|                 | /s/ Crowe  Chizek and Company LLC |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                 |                              |
|                 | Crowe Chizek  and Company LLC     |
|                 |
| Oak  Brook, Illinois |
| March 29,  2004      |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.01 Applicability. ( a ) Unless otherwise indicated, this part applies to each vessel that carries oil in bulk as cargo and that is: ( 1 ) Documented under the laws of the United States (a U.S. vessel); or
( 2 ) Any other vessel that enters or operates in the navigable waters of the United States, or that operates, conducts ligtering under 46 U.S.C. 3715, or receives cargo from or transfers cargo to a deepwater port under 33 U.S.C. 1501 *et seq.*, in the United States Exclusive Economic Zone, as defined in 33 U.S.C. 2701(8).
( b ) This part does not apply to a vessel exempted under 46 U.S.C. 2109 or 46 U.S.C. 3702.
[CGD 90-051, 57 FR 36238, Aug. 12, 1992, as amended by CGD 91-045, 61 FR 39788, July 30, 1996]
?

i

KNOW YOURRights! If you live in a nursing home or assisted living, you have:

The right to information, in a language you understand.

The right to participate in all 

aspects of your care.

The right to privacy and 

confidentiality.

The right to make 

independent 

choices 

based on your 

needs and 

preferences.

The right to 

participate in social, 

religious, and 

community 

activities.

THE RIGHT TO...

safe and appropriate transfer and discharge, including 

the right to appeal decisions.

complain without fear of repercussions.

be free from discrimination, abuse, neglect, 

and restraints.

The right to organize 

and participate in resident 

groups or councils.

The right to information 

about living in the 

community.

The right to adequate medical care 

and treatment.

The right to 

visits 

from friends, 

family, 

providers and 

other people of 

your choosing.

Long-Term Care Ombudsman programs act as advocates for residents of 

nursing homes; board & care, and assisted living facilities; and similar residential 

care facilities. Find your local program: acl.gov/ombudsman or 800-677-1116
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the second quarter of
fiscal year 2005 ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 8, 2005
    /s/  Jeffrey A. RichJeffrey A. Rich,Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc.
Argued and submitted December 9,

reversed and remanded December 28, 1994

#### In the Matter of Charlene Tardanico, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*CHARLENE TARDANICO, *Appellant.*

(9402-95325; CA A83206)

888 P2d 15

Paul L. Breed argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

*230-aBefore Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*231PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, the trial court failed to advise appellant of her rights under ORS 426.100. As we held in *State v. May,*131 Or App 570, 888 P2d 14 (1994), advisement of those rights is mandatory, and a failure to advise or to determine that there has been a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to be advised requires reversal.

The state contends that the error was not preserved in the trial court. We conclude that the error is apparent on the face of the record, ORAP 5.45(2), and that it is an egregious one. We exercise our discretion to review the error. *Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.,*312 Or 376, 381, 823 P2d 956 (1991).

Reversed and remanded.
#### Collier *v.*Whatley, administrator.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Fish, C. J.

There being no complaint that the court erred during the progress of the trial, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the judgment refusing new trial is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*97Equitable petition. Before Judge Reagan. Pike superior court. October 3, 1905.

*F. F. Dupree,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. J. Lester*and *J. F. Bedding,*contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001075445
<NAME>                        Shoe Krazy, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         50,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               50,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,200
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       210
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00290

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF A.M. AND M.M.,

C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 360th District

Court

of Tarrant County (360

- 596726

- 16)

November 21, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

It is further ordered that Appellant B.M. shall pay all of the costs of this appea l,

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
#### Jackson *v.*Strickland *et al.*

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 13, 1906.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Gober. Cherokee superior court. October *3,*1905.

*P. P. DuPre,*for plaintiff. *E. W.*Ooleman, for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

1. A plaintiff in ejectment may recover in his prior possession alone. Civil Code, §5008. This is true, even though he may have relinquished such possession, if such relinquishment were made animo revertendi; and whether such relinquishment was so made is a question of fact for the jury. *Jones*v. *Nunn,*12 *Ga.*469; *King*v. *Sears,*91 *Ga.*577(7).

2. Ordinarily it is not necessary to anticipate the defense, and where the plaintiff relies on prior possession, he need not aver that the defendant is a trespasser, but evidence of prior possession alone is sufficient to put the defendant on proof that he has a better title than that of the plaintiff. *Moss*v. *Chappell,*and cases cited, 126 *Ga.*198.

3. The evidence for the plaintiff being sufficient to show prior possession, it was erroneous to dismiss the case at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 164.53 Deviations from rules and reporting: Non-operating equipment. ( a ) If during a voyage any equipment required by this part stops operating properly, the person directing the movement of the vessel may continue to the next port of call, subject to the directions of the District Commander or the Captain of the Port, as provided by part 160 of this chapter.
( b ) If the vessel's automatic identification system (AIS) radar, radio navigation receivers, gyrocompass, echo depth sounding device, or primary steering gear stops operating properly, the person directing the movement of the vessel must report or cause to be reported that it is not operating properly to the nearest Captain of the Port, District Commander, or, if participating in a Vessel Traffic Service, to the Vessel Traffic Center, as soon as possible.
(46 U.S.C. 70034; 49 CFR 1.46(n)(4))
[CGD 74-77, 42 FR 5956, Jan. 31, 1977] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 164.53, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.197 Sonoma Creek.

The draw of the Northwestern Pacific railroad bridge, mile 5.4 at Wingo, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
vsym_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 



 


AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT







It is hereby agreed that the Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2012 (the "Agreement") entered into by and between View Systems Inc., of 1550 Caton Centre Drive, Suite E, Baltimore, MD 21231 (the "Buyer") and Essential Security Group, of 4730 West Bancroft, Suite One, Toledo, Ohio, 43615 (the "Seller"), is amended as follows as of the 28th day of June, 2012:







Paragraph 7 of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety as follows:








	
  

	
7.

	
Closing and Closing Date. Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement. The investigation authorized under paragraph 6 of the Agreement (the “Investigation”)  shall not commence before the time when Seller has delivered to Buyer all documents called for by the Agreement and an audit of the financial statements of Seller shall have been completed by a PCAOB registered accounting firm of Buyer’s choice resulting in an opinion on the financial statements satisfactory to Buyer. Buyer shall then have had at least thirty (30) days to complete its Investigation with the time period of the Investigation commencing after Seller’s fulfillment of all conditions of the Agreement not waived by Buyer, including the provision of the aforementioned audit opinion.  Buyer shall have the absolute right to cancel the Agreement at any time up to the fortieth (40th) day after commencement of the Investigation time period. Thereafter, if Buyer has accepted the purchase of Seller, the closing shall take place on the forty-first (41st) day after commencement of the Investigation time period at such date as may be mutually acceptable to the parties hereto (the "Closing Date" or "Closing") at the office of Buyer in Baltimore, Maryland, or at such other place as may approved in writing by the parties hereto.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment by the signatures of their duly authorized corporate officers, as of the day and year first above written.


 



	/s/ Gunther Than	 
	Gunther Than	 
	CEO	 
	View Systems Inc.	 
	 	 
	/s/ John P. Rademaker	 
	John P. Rademaker	 
	Principal	 
	Essential Security Group	 
	 	 
	/s/ David Loyer	 
	David Loyer	 
	Principal	 
	Essential Security Group