alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 151.27 Plan submission and approval. ( a ) No manned ship subject to this part may operate unless it carries on board a shipboard oil pollution emergency plan approved by the Coast Guard. An unmanned ship subject to this regulation must carry the notification list required in § 151.26(b)(3) on board in the documentation container; remaining sections of the plan must be maintained on file at the home office. For new ships, plans must be submitted at least 90 days before the ship intends to begin operations.
( b ) An owner or operator of a ship to which this part applies shall prepare and submit one English language copy of the shipboard oil pollution emergency plan electronically at *https://vrp.uscg.mil/homeport-vrp/vrp-express/* by signing in using the registered email address and password or by email to *vrp@uscg.mil*. For new user registrations, please follow the process provided in the United States Coast Guard Homeport website at *https://homeport.uscg.mil/Pages/NewUserRegistration.aspx.or* by mail to Commandant (CG-MER), Attn: Vessel Response Plans, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593-7501.
( c ) An owner or operator with multiple ships to which this part applies may submit one plan for each type of ship with a separate ship-specific appendix for each vessel covered by the plan.
( d ) Combined shipboard oil pollution emergency plans and response plans meeting the requirements of subparts D and E of part 155 of this chapter must be prepared according to § 155.1030(j) of this chapter.
( e ) If the Coast Guard determines that the plan meets the requirements of this section, the Coast Guard will issue an approval letter. The approval period for a plan expires 5 years after the approval date.
( f ) If the Coast Guard determines that the plan does not meet the requirements, the Coast Guard will notify the owner or operator of the plan's deficiency. The owner or operator must then resubmit a copy of the revised plan or the corrected portions of the plan, within the time period specified in the written notice provided by the Coast Guard.
( g ) Plans, including revisions, should be submitted electronically by using the Vessel Response Plan Electronic Submission Tool available at *https://vrp.uscg.mil/homeport-vrp/vrp-express/* for registered users or by mail to Commandant (CG-MER), Attn: Vessel Response Plans, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7516, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593-7516 or by email to *vrp@uscg.mil*.
[CGD 93-030, 59 FR 51342, Oct. 7, 1994, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33665, June 28, 1996; USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35530, June 30, 1998; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35014, June 19, 2008; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010; USCG-2008-1070, 78 FR 60122, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38435, July 7, 2014; 89 FR 22947, Apr. 3, 2024]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I, Michael Gorin,Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

TheForm 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended September 30, 2003fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated forthe periods presented.

 

 
|   |  /s/ Michael Gorin  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                     |
|   | Name:  Michael Gorin     |
|   |                     |
|   | Date:  November 14, 2003 |

 

 

Thiscertification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shallnot be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic report described herein norshall it be deemed filed by Aeroflex Incorporated for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporatedand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 523 

Expressing the strong support of the Senate for the declaration of the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization at the Bucharest Summit that Ukraine 

and Georgia will become members of the alliance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2008 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. LUGAR, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. OBAMA, and Mr. 

MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the strong support of the Senate for the declaration of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization at the 

Bucharest Summit that Ukraine and Georgia will become 

members of the alliance. 

Whereas, prior to the Bucharest Summit in April 2008, the 

Government of Georgia and the Government of Ukraine 

each expressed the desire to join the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization (NATO), have committed their 

countries to programs of reforms consistent with membership in the Euro-Atlantic community, and have 

worked consistently for membership in NATO; and 

Whereas, in April 2008 at the Bucharest Summit, the assembled leaders of NATO issued the following statement: 

‘‘NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 523 IS 

aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today 

that these countries will become members of NATO. 

Both nations have made valuable contributions to Alliance operations. We welcome the democratic reforms in 

Ukraine and Georgia and look forward to free and fair 

parliamentary elections in Georgia in May. MAP is the 

next step for Ukraine and Georgia on their direct way to 

membership. Today we make clear that we support these 

countries’ applications for MAP. Therefore we will now 

begin a period of intensive engagement with both at a 

high political level to address the questions still outstanding pertaining to their MAP applications. We have 

asked Foreign Ministers to make a first assessment of 

progress at their December 2008 meeting. Foreign Ministers have the authority to decide on the MAP applications of Ukraine and Georgia.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the declaration of the Bucharest 

3 Summit, which stated that Ukraine and Georgia will 

4 become members of NATO; 

5 (2) reiterates its support for the commitment to 

6 further enlargement of NATO to include democratic 

7 governments that are able and willing to meet the 

8 responsibilities of membership; and 

9 (3) urges the foreign ministers of NATO mem10 ber states at their meeting in December 2008 to 

11 consider favorably the applications of the governmstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 523 IS 

1 ments of Ukraine and Georgia for Membership Ac2 tion Plans. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# A-7 Entities
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.321 How many ring life buoys must be on each deepwater port?

There must be at least four approved ring life buoys on each manned deepwater port.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on February 2, 2011 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.

The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

The Commission will consider whether to propose rules and a form to implement Section 763 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to the registration and regulation of security-based swap execution facilities.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 26, 2011.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-2136 Filed 1-27-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.516 What are the periodic requirements for weight testing?

The operator must weight test, using the procedure outlined in 46 CFR 199.45(a)(1), each lifeboat, davit-launched liferaft, and rescue boat every time a fall is replaced or turned end-for-end.
#### Frederick *v.*The State.

Argued November 19,

Decided December 11, 1906.

Atkinson, J.

An indictment for the offense of larceny from the house,

wherein it is alleged that the thing stolen consisted of “nine 'dollars in money of the value of nine dollars,” is not subject to a special demurrer upon the ground that the property alleged to have been stolen was not sufficiently described. *Cannon*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*785.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*36Indictment for larceny from the house. Before Judge Hammond. Columbia superior court. September 25, 1906.

*G. L. Callaway,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. 8. Reynolds, solicitor-general,*by *John M. Graham,*contra.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Accounting Office

The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will meet Monday, June 19, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and Tuesday, June 20, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., in room 7C13 of the General Accounting Office building, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC.

The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will hold a meeting to discuss issues that may impact government auditing standards. Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Council discussions and reviews are open to the public.

For further information contact: Marcia Buchanan, Assistant Director, Government Auditing Standards, AIMD, 202-512-9321.

Marcia B. Buchanan,

Assistant Director.

[FR Doc. 00-13897  Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
<PAGE>

                         [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP]

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

Partners of Litton Loan Servicing LP:

We have examined managements assertion about Litton Loan Servicing LPs
(the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination of the Companys
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
---------------------------
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
February 20, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Pennington County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pennington County Recource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Rapid City, SD. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) 
and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose 
of the meeting is to review and make recommendations for approval of 
remaining project proposals.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 13, 2011, at 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mystic Ranger District 
Office at 8221 South Highway 16. Written comments should be sent to 
Robert J. Thompson, 8221 South Highway 16, Rapid City, SD 57702. 
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d4f57495552504d4e52537d5b4e135b585913484e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cab8a0bea2a5a7bab9a5a48aacb9e4acafaee4bfb9">[email protected]</span></a>, or via 
facsimile to 605-343-7134.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at the Mystic Ranger 
District office. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead at 605-343-1567 
to facilitate entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Thompson, District Ranger, 
Mystic Ranger District, 605-343-1567.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings are open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: review and make recommendations 
for approval of remaining project proposals.

    Dated: August 16, 2011.
Dan S. Dallas,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-21478 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAPOUCHE EDMOND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2057 

[January 2, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562007CF005160A.

Papouche Edmond, Jasper, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant 

Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,650
<INVENTORY>                                     15,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               438,954
<PP&E>                                         300,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,338,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,606
<BONDS>                                        421,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           493
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,338,164
<SALES>                                        447,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               447,686
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  402,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,141)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,964
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,026
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47


</TABLE>
Hillsborough

No. 7379

#### State of New Hampshire v. Donald Collins

March 31, 1977

*199
      *David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Richard B. Michaud,*by brief, for the state.

Donald Collins, by brief, pro se.

Memorandum Opinion

Indictment under RSA 637:7 for disposing of stolen property. Trial by jury, in which the defendant was represented by counsel, resulting in a verdict of guilty.

After the verdict, the defendant’s motion to set it aside as “against the weight of the credible evidence and contrary to the law” and for a new trial, was denied. The defendant excepted. Transferred by *Perkins,*J.

The only question before us on the record is whether the court’s denial of the motion should be sustained. An examination of the entire record, including the transcript, discloses that the evidence was ample to support the court’s action. The jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the state proved every element of the crime as articulated by RSA 637:7. The fact that the evidence was circumstantial does not impair the verdict. *State v. Keyser,*117 N.H. 45, 369 A.2d 224 (1977); *State v. Palumbo,*113 N.H. 329, 306 A.2d 793 (1973).

The order is

*Exception overruled.*
|   | (1)    | such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tamalpais Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,                                     |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tamalpais Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tamalpais Bancorp. |

| Dated: April 15, 2010 | /s/ MARK GARWOOD                     |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                  | Mark Garwood                         |
|                  | Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer)        |

----
§ 162.120 Harbors on Lake Michigan. ( a ) No vessel greater than 40 feet in length may exceed 8 miles per hour in the harbors of Michigan City, Indiana; St. Joseph, South Haven, Saugatuck, Holland (Lake Macatawa), Grand Haven, Muskegon, White Lake, Pentwater, Ludington, Manistee, Portage Lake (Manistee County), Frankfort, Charlevoix, and Petoskey, Michigan.
( b ) No vessel greater than 40 feet in length may exceed 4 miles per hour in the harbors of Menominee, Michigan and Wisconsin; Algoma, Kewaunee, Two Rivers, Manitowac, Sheboygan, Port Washington, Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha and Green Bay, Wisconsin; and Waukegan, Illinois.
[CGD 79-151, 46 FR 7960, Jan. 26, 1981, as amended by USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37315, June 21, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.700 What kind of portable lights may be used on a deepwater port?

Each portable light and its supply cord on a deepwater port must be designed for the environment where it is used.
#### § 143.407 Manning.

Standby vessels must be crewed in accordance with their certificate of inspection for 24 hour operation. The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require the crew to be augmented, as necessary, to provide for maneuvering the standby vessel, for lookouts, for rigging and operating retrieval equipment, and for caring for survivors.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.222 When must public hearings or meetings be held? ( a ) Before a license is issued, at least one public license hearing under 33 U.S.C. 1504(g) must be held in each Adjacent Coastal State. Other Federal statutes and regulations may impose additional requirements for public hearings or meetings, and if not otherwise prohibited, a hearing under this paragraph may be consolidated with any such additional hearing or meeting.
( b ) The Commandant (CG-5P) or the MARAD Administrator will publish a notice of public hearings or meetings in the Federal Register, and will mail or deliver a copy of the notice to the applicant, to each Adjacent Coastal State, and to all who request a copy.
( c ) Anyone may attend a public hearing or meeting and provide relevant oral or written information. The presiding officer may limit the time for providing oral information.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58279, Sept. 18, 2020]