alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The YMCA of the Suncoast

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year sustainability

grant are to:

• Significantly increase the number of older 

adults and adults with disabilities at risk 

for falls who participate in evidencebased community programs to reduce 

falls and falls risks; and

• Implement innovative funding 

arrangements to support the proposed 

programs, while embedding the 

programs into an integrated, sustainable 

program network. 

The YMCA of the Suncoast (Suncoast Y) and its 

partners will: 

• Develop and implement a unified public 

communications campaign

• Establish and install a formalized provider 

referral process

• Expand the number of community-based 

falls prevention program sessions by 

adding new community locations and 

training more instructors

• Establish a centralized, coordinated 

process for receiving referrals from 

• Tampa Bay Falls Prevention Project

healthcare providers and payment

• Establish a sliding scale fee for service 

rate for self-pay individuals and a rate to 

propose to future sponsors

• Execute a formal MOU with BCHS to 

cover the cost of participation by low to 

moderate income individuals

• Disseminate the project’s results to local, 

state and national audiences. 

Proposed Interventions

• EnhanceFitness

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, Suncoast Y will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• BayCare Health System

• YMCA of Greater St. Petersburg

• Tampa Metropolitan Area YMCA

Anticipated Results 

Suncoast Y and its partners propose to achieve 

the following results: 
2 of 2

This project is supported by the Prevention and Public Health Fund 2018.

• Increase the number of older adults and 

older adults with disabilities at risk for 

falls who participate in evidence-based 

community programs to reduce falls and 

• falls risks by serving 4,050 older adult 

participants over the 3-year funding 

period.

• Develop and implement a unified public 

communications campaign to reach a 

minimum of 150,000 individuals.

• Establish and install a formalized provider 

referral process resulting in 3,000 

provider referrals over the project period.

• Train 30 EnhanceFitness instructors and 1 

trainer of trainers.

• Identify and secure 20 community-based 

implementation sites.

• Implement innovative funding 

arrangements, including contracts and 

collaborations with sustainability 

partners by establishing formal written 

agreements.

Contact:

Shannon Sprowls

The YMCA of the Suncoast

ssprowls@suncoastymca.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.242 How does a person who is not a party to a formal hearing present evidence at the hearing? ( a ) A person who is not a party to a formal hearing may present evidence at the hearing if he or she sends a petition to present evidence to the ALJ Docketing Center before the beginning of the formal hearing. The petition must describe the evidence that the person will present and show its relevance to the issues listed in the notice of formal hearing.
( b ) If a petition is granted, the ruling will specify which evidence is approved to be presented at the hearing.
§ 155.100 Applicability. ( a ) Subject to the exceptions provided for in paragraph (b) and (c) of this section, this part applies to each ship that: ( 1 ) Is operated under the authority of the United States, wherever located; or
( 2 ) Is operated under the authority of a country other than the United States while in the navigable waters of the United States, or while at a port or terminal under the jurisdiction of the United States.
( b ) This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) A warship, naval auxiliary, or other ship owned or operated by a country when engaged in non-commercial service; or
( 2 ) Any other ship specifically excluded by MARPOL 73/78.
( c ) Section 155.480 applies to each tank vessel with a cargo capacity of 1,000 or more cubic meters (approximately 6,290 barrels), loading oil or oil reside as cargo that is operated under the authority of the United States, wherever located, or operated under the authority of a country other than the United States while in the navigable waters of the United States, or while at a port or terminal under the jurisdiction of the United States.
[CGD 75-124a, 48 FR 45714, Oct. 6, 1983, as amended by CGD 90-071a, 62 FR 48773, Sept. 17, 1997]
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.610 Operational measures.

An owner or operator of a tank vessel that carries other non-petroleum oil in bulk as cargo or cargo residue shall comply with the requirements in all sections of subpart G of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.751 Security Zone: LNG mooring slip, Savannah River, Savannah, Georgia. ( a ) *Security zone.* The following area is a security zone: All the waters from surface to bottom of the northeastern most mooring dolphin located at approximately 32[deg]05.01′ North, 080[deg]59.38′ West, to the southeastern most mooring dolphin located at approximately 32[deg]04.79′ North, 080[deg]59.35′ West, and continues west along the North and South shoreline of the mooring slip to the shoreline of the right descending bank of the Savannah River. All marine traffic is prohibited from entering this zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP).
( b ) *Applicability.* This section applies to all vessels including naval and other public vessels, except vessels that are engaged in the following operations: ( 1 ) Law enforcement, security, or search and rescue;
( 2 ) Servicing aids to navigation;
( 3 ) Surveying, maintenance, or improvement of waters in the security zone; or
( 4 ) Actively engaged in escort, maneuvering, or support duties for an LNG tankship.
( c ) *Regulations.* In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.33 of this part, entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Savannah or vessels engaged in activities defined in paragraph (b).
( d ) *Reporting of violations.* Violations of this section should be reported to the Captain of the Port, Savannah, at (912) 652-4353.
[COTP SAVANNAH 06-160, 72 FR 27246, May 15, 2007]
’

’

A diversified workplace is good for the bottom 

line. Research shows that American businesses 

that hire and support workers with disabilities 

see improved performance and productivity --

28% higher revenue and 30% higher profit margins 

than peer business that do not. Inclusive employers 

also report higher overall employee morale and higher 

retention rates of workers with disabilities. 

However, businesses that want to diversify their 

workforces and do not always know how to implement

effective talent pipelines that include people with 

disabilities, and people with disabilities have 

historically been left out of the workforce. 

In November 2019, ACL launched the Inclusive Talent 

Pipeline for American Businesses prize competition to 

help businesses expand their recruiting and retention 

programs to better include workers with disabilities 

(particularly people with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities), The goal is both to ensure 

Americans with disabilities can participate and 

succeed in the future economy, and to enhance and 

strengthen American businesses. 

From more than 50 competitive proposals, ACL 

selected five first-phase winners. In phase two, three 

finalists were selected to compete for the $100,000 

grand prize.

Our future depends on neurodiversity. 

opportunity to tackle systemic inequality by economically 

ACL s Inclusive Pipeline Challenge has given Mentra the 

“

empowering underserved communities. We re erasing the 

stigma around Disability Hiring with our recruiting platform 

that matches neurodiverse talent with inclusive employers. 

The ACL challenge has enabled Mentra to build a scalable 

solution to [neuro]diversify the workforce. 

— Mentra ” 

CHALLENGE PHASES 

PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 

Proposal of Innovative Models: Small Scale Testing of Models: Promise of Model Sustainability: 

Five (5) teams awarded a total of Three (3) teams awarded a total of One (1) team will be awarded 

$100,000 $180,000 $100,000 

https://acl.gov/programs/acl-seeks-business-partners-increase-hiring-workers-disabilities

PHASE 2 Winners: 

FALA Technologies • KPMG & Melwood • Mentra
§ 145.01 Portable and semi-portable fire extinguishers. ( a ) On all manned platforms and on all unmanned platforms where crews are continuously working on a 24-hour basis, Coast Guard-approved portable fire extinguishers and/or Coast Guard-approved semi-portable fire extinguishers must be installed and maintained. On all unmanned platforms where crews are not continuously working on a 24-hour basis, Coast Guard-approved portable fire extinguishers and/or Coast Guard-approved semi-portable fire extinguishers are required to be installed and maintained only when crews are working on them.
( b ) Portable and semi-portable fire extinguishers must be inspected and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10 (incorporated by reference, see § 140.7 of this chapter) as amended here: ( 1 ) Certification or licensing by a state or local jurisdiction as a fire extinguisher servicing agency will be accepted by the Coast Guard as meeting the personnel certification requirements of NFPA 10 for annual maintenance and recharging of extinguishers.
( 2 ) Monthly inspections required by NFPA 10 may be conducted by the owner, operator, person-in-charge, or a designated member of the crew.
( 3 ) Non-rechargeable or non-refillable fire extinguishers must be inspected and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10. However, the annual maintenance need not be conducted by a certified person and can be conducted by the owner, operator, person-in-charge, or a designated member of the crew.
( 4 ) The owner or managing operator must provide satisfactory evidence of the required servicing to the marine inspector. If any of the equipment or records has not been properly maintained, a qualified servicing facility must perform the required inspections, maintenance procedures, and hydrostatic pressure tests. A tag issued by a qualified servicing organization, and attached to each extinguisher, may be accepted as evidence that the necessary maintenance procedures have been conducted.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48242, July 22, 2016]
#### § 2590.703 Guaranteed renewability in multiemployer plans and multiple employer welfare arrangements. [Reserved]
#### Stearns Coal Company v. King.

(Decided January 13, 1916.)

Appeal from McCreary Circuit Court.

Master and Servant — Fellow Servants — Recovery for Ordinary-Negligence.- — Motormen on separate cars are not fellow servants,, and there may be a recovery by one if he is injured by the ordinary negligence of another.

J. N. SHARP for appellant.

R. L. POPE, L. G. CAMPBELL and W, F. HINKLE for appellee'.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming..

The appellee, King, while operating a motor car in the mine of the appellant company, was injured when *720another motor car collided with the one he was operating. In a suit to recover damages for the injuries so sustained, there was a verdict and judgment for fifteen hundred dollars, followed by this appeal.

It appears from the evidence that the appellee, when working at his regular employment, was a coal miner, but on the day of the injury he was directed by the assistant mine foreman to take the place of a regular motorman, who was absent. Another motor car was in charge of one Howard Phillips, and Howard Phillips was directed by the assistant foreman to take his motor outside and wait there until the other motors came out. But in place of doing this, and while appellee was coming out with his motor, Phillips started with the motor he was operating back into the mine and collided with the motor being operated by the appellee. Why Phillips ran his motor in the mine at a time when he knew, or should have known, that appellee was coming out on the same track, is not disclosed by the evidence, as Phillips did not testify.

On this appeal one ground urged for reversal is that the court instructed the jury that there could be a recovery if the injury was caused by the ordinary negligence of Phillips, when the appellant company could not be held liable in this action for damages unless the injury was caused by the gross negligence of Phillips. But the rule has been announced by this court many times that in cases like this there may be a recovery for ordinary negligence: L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Brown, 127 Ky., 732.

These motormen were not fellow servants: Milton v. Frankfort *&*Versailles Traction Co., 139 Ky., 53; Louisville Railway Co. v. Hibbitt, 139 Ky., 43.

The only other ground relied on for- reversal is that appellee was guilty of such contributory negligence in operating his motor without lights as to defeat a recovery. In answer to this it is sufficient to say that the •evidence shows very conclusively that the motor King was operating was not equipped with lights, or if it was, the lighting machinery was so defective as that it could not be used.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,156
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  355,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,040
<INVENTORY>                                     36,693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               443,941
<PP&E>                                       1,759,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 878,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,348,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          321,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,115
<OTHER-SE>                                     614,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,348,751
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,156,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,985,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.64
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Morton Industrial Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-68927 and 333-69575) on Form S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 16, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows and the consolidated financial statement schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Morton
Industrial Group, Inc.

KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 29, 2001
**Exhibit 10(a)1**

**COMPENSATION AND RETENTION AGREEMENT**

**THIS COMPENSATION AND RETENTION AGREEMENT** (the “Agreement”), made and entered into by and between **SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC.** (the “Company”) and **C. ALAN MARTIN** (“Employee”), shall be effective as of February 1, 2008 (the “Effective Date”).

WITNESSETH:

**WHEREAS,** Employee has been named the President of the Company effective February 1, 2008; 

**WHEREAS,** the Company wishes to encourage Employee to continue employment with the Company for a three year term and to provide Employee with compensation and retention awards for service he will provide to the Company; and

**WHEREAS,** this Agreement should be treated as an Award made by the Compensation and Management Succession Committee of the Southern Company Board (the “Compensation Committee”) under the Southern Company 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”).

**NOW, THEREFORE,** in consideration of the premises, and the agreement of the parties set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

|   | 1. | Retention Payment Amounts. |
|--------|----|----------------------------|

 (a)       Employee shall become vested in the following amounts provided Employee is actively employed and serving as President of the Company on the designated Employment Vesting Date set forth below:

 

----
§ 138.220 Definitions. ( a ) As used in this subpart, the following terms have the meanings set forth in OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2701): *deepwater port, facility, gross ton, liability, oil, offshore facility, onshore facility, responsible party, tank vessel,* and *vessel*.
( b ) As used in this subpart—
*Annual CPI-U* means the annual “Consumer Price Index—All Urban Consumers, Not Seasonally Adjusted, U.S. City Average, All items, 1982-84=100”, published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
*Current period* means the year in which the Annual CPI-U was most recently published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
*Director, NPFC* means the person in charge of the U.S. Coast Guard, National Pollution Funds Center (NPFC), or that person's authorized representative.
*Edible oil tank vessel* means a tank vessel referred to in OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(c)(4)(A)).
*Oil spill response vessel* means a tank vessel referred to in OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(c)(4)(B)).
*Previous period* means the year in which the previous limit of liability was established, or last adjusted by statute or regulation, whichever is later.
*Single-hull* means the hull of a tank vessel that is constructed or adapted to carry, or that carries, oil in bulk as cargo or cargo residue, that is not a double hull as defined in 33 CFR part 157. Single-hull includes the hull of any such tank vessel that is fitted with double sides only or a double bottom only.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00334-CR

Kermit Antwoine Woods

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1429207D)

October 27, 2016

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Initiating the Agency-Level Protest

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Initiating the Agency-Level Protest Initiating the Agency-Level ProtestADR2022-02-17T18:34:11-05:00
			
			Initiating the Agency-Level ProtestProtests to the contracting agency should be submitted to the person designated in the solicitation, which is usually the contracting officer.  The solicitation should have information regarding how such protests are filed, and the FAR provides a standard “Service of Protest” clause at FAR 52.233-2, which states:
As prescribed in [FAR] 33.106, Contracting Officers complete and insert the following provision:
**SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEPT 2006)**
(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency,and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from _______ [Contracting Officer designate the official or location where a protest may be served on the Contracting Officer.]
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 In Connection with the Annual Report of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas J. Leech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Douglas J. LeechDouglas J. LeechMarch 19, 2005
    Chief Executive Officer 99
§ 174.101 Applicability of State casualty reporting system. ( a ) A State casualty reporting system must require the reporting of vessel casualties and accidents involving vessels to which § 173.51 of this chapter applies.
( b ) The State casualty reporting system may also require vessel casualty or accident reports for property damage in amounts less than that required under § 173.55 of this chapter.
(46 U.S.C. 1486; 49 CFR 1.46(n)(1))
[CGD 72-54R, 37 FR 21402, Oct. 7, 1972, as amended by CGD 76-155, 44 FR 5309, Mar. 25, 1979; CGD 82-015, 54 FR 5610, Feb. 6, 1989]