alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order issued January Jf,J, 2013 

.. : '! .-. • • .J -. 

In The 

C!rnurt nf l\pp£tds 

llrtftq1Bistrict nf ID£xa.s at ilallas 

No. 05-10-01375-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF C.H.C. AND .S.M.C., CHILDREN, 

· ORDER . . - : ' · : :· .... -·· . -· ~-- .... · -· -: . . . -· .. \. - .. -·-

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing and motion for 

rehearing en bane is GRANTED, and the time for appellant to file her motion for rehearing and 

motion for rehearing en bane is extended to February 19, 2013. 

~)Ji. .· 

JUSTICE 

IAN~
****

# Sample Proclamation

Support from a mayor or governor can raise community awareness about Older Americans Month. Use the proclamation template below to request public recognition by your local government officials.

# Older Americans Month 2017

## A Proclamation

Whereas**,** [community, area, or organization] includes older Americans who richly contribute to our community; and 

Whereas**,**we acknowledge that what it means “to age” has changed—for the better. 

Whereas**,** [community, area, or organization] is committed to supporting older adults as they take charge of their health, explore new opportunities and activities, and focus on independence; and

Whereas**,**[community, area, or organization] can provide opportunities to enrich the lives of individuals of *all ages* by: 

· involving older adults in the redefinition of aging in our community;

· promoting home- and community-based services that support independent living; 

· encouraging older adults to speak up for themselves and others; and

· providing opportunities for older adults to share their experiences.

Now therefore**,**[I/we] of [city/town, state] do hereby proclaim May 2017 to be Older Americans Month. [I/we] urge every resident to take time during this month to acknowledge older adults and the people who serve them as influential and vital parts of our community.

Dated this [day] day of [month], 2017

[Name of person/entity approving proclamation]

[Seal, if applicable]

# image1.jpeg
HENRY
BROS. ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of HENRY BROS. ELECTRONICS, INC. (the
“COMPANY”) on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Security and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the “Report”), we, James
E. Henry, Brian Reach and John P. Hopkins, the Chief Executive Officer, the
Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Section
1350) that to our knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material;
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      company.





/s/ James E. HenryName:  James
      E. HenryChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Brian ReachName:  Brian
      ReachChief
      Operating Officer/s/ John P. HopkinsName:  John
      P. HopkinsChief
      Financial
Officer
* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11031

A. J. SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF FORT WORTH; ET AL, Defendants,

THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(4:98-CV-238)

July 12 2001

Before HIGGINB OTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE *

, District Judge.

PER CURIAM: **

We are not persuaded that there is a genuine issue of material

fact regarding Singleton’s claims made under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for

the reason that a reasonable jury could not find the requisite2

causation between a city policy and the claimed injury. The

remaining claims are equally without merit.

AFFIRMED.
§ 2706.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The General Counsel shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to General Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 520N, Washington, DC 20004-1710
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), or section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 792), is not readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 2706.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[51 FR 22893, 22896, June 23, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 22893, June 23, 1986; 67 FR 60863, Sept. 27, 2002; 77 FR 48431, Aug. 14, 2012]
#### In the Matter of Yovall Augoshe, Appellant, v Melissa A. Lesko, Respondent.

Submitted May 28, 1996;

decided July 9, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to appeal from the nonfinal order of the Appellate Division entered in a proceeding commenced in Justice Court *(see,*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
third quarter of fiscal year 2004 ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: May 17, 2004
    
    /s/ Jeffrey A. RichJeffrey A. Rich,Chief Executive Officer of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.117 Chemical resistance test. ( a ) In each case where the recognized facility doubts the ability of a material to withstand exposure to the substances listed in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section a sample of the material must be tested.
( b ) A sample referred to in paragraph (a) of this section must be partially submerged in each of the following substances for 100 hours at an ambient temperature of 22 °C. ( 1 ) Sewage.
( 2 ) Any disinfectant that is required in the operation of the device.
( 3 ) Any chemical compound in solid, liquid or gaseous form, used, emitted or produced in the operation of the device.
( 4 ) Fresh or salt (3.5 percent Sodium Chloride) flush water.
( 5 ) Toilet bowl cleaners.
( 6 ) Engine Oil (SAE/30).
( 7 ) Ethylene Glycol.
( 8 ) Detergents (household and bilge cleaning type).
( c ) A sample of the material must be doused 20 times, with a 1 hour drying period between dousings, in each of the following substances: ( 1 ) Gasoline.
( 2 ) Diesel fuel.
( 3 ) Mineral spirits.
( 4 ) Turpentine.
( 5 ) Methyl alcohol.
Exhibit
32.3




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of Aeroflex Holding Corp., hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex
Holding Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Holding
Corp.





/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.Name:  John
      Adamovich, Jr.Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  February
      9, 2011





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aeroflex Holding Corp. and will be retained by Aeroflex Holding Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00453

- CV
GUILLERMO R. PECHERO, M.D.

v. AGUSTIN GARCIA AND RONALD JACKSON

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 10

- 2331

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEA LS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court SET ASIDE and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings consistent w ith its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ant

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 16, 2105
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report of Marsh
Supermarkets, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending March
29, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Don E. Marsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Don E. Marsh
-----------------------------
Don E. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00357

- CV

IN RE: A PURPORTED LIEN OR CLAIM AGAINST HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY,

INC.

,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 18394 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s brief was due September 12, 2014. On September 12, 2014, appellee filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file its brief and a request to include two exhibits from appellate cause number 04

- 14

- 00012

- CV in this appellate cause number. As to the extension, appellee ask ed for an additio nal twenty

- one days to file the record from the date a supplement

clerk’s record is filed. Appellee contends the record is incomplete and it has requested additional

documents to be included in the clerk’s record an d that such filing is imminent. We gran ted appel lee’s motion for extension of time and ordered a ppellee to file its appellate brief twenty

- one days after the date the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. We also ordered the district clerk to file the requested supplemental record.

As to th e missing exhibits, we denied appellee’s the request to incorporate the exhibits

from cause number 04

- 14

- 00012

- CV into the current cause number. Rather, we ordered the court reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record including complete versions of defendant’s exhibits 8 and 9 from the sanctions hearing. We noted that c ontrary to the reporter’s index of exhibits, exhibits 8 and 9 were offered into evidence without opposition and are cited to by the trial court in the judgment and order of sanctions. We ordered t he court reporter to file the complete exhibits described above in this court

.

On September 11, 2014, the supplemental clerk’s record was filed. On September 26, 2014, a supplemental reporter’s record was filed containing a supplement to e xhibit 9. This court queried the court reporter to determine if the record was now complete with regard to

exhibits 8 and 9. On October 8, 2014, the court reporter filed a letter in this court advising that exhibit 9 is now complete and that exhibit 8 “i s complete as presented to me on the day they were marked.” Accordingly, it now appears the appellate record is complete with regard to appellee’s requests.We therefore ORDER appellee to file its appellee’s br ief in this court on or before October 30, 2014

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, all counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671

DELIO BATISTA,

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ, and

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC.,

REINIER CORTES, and

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF FILING DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. Transcript from Deposition Relied Upon By Defendants

1. Deposition Transcript of Defendant Reinier Cortes taken on April 11, 2023. 

II. Declarations Relied upon by Defendants. 

2. Declaration of AVANT ASSURANCE INC. President REINIER CORTES 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been filed via electronic

communication this 19TH DAY OF May, 2023 with the Clerk of Court and served upon all Counsel

of Record.

 Daniel E. Tropp

Daniel E. Tropp, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 948128

CUETO LAW GROUP P.L.

Attorneys for Defendants 

4000 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Ste 470

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel.: (305) 777 0377

Primary Email: dantropp@cuetolawgroup.com

Secondary email dantroppesq@gmail.com

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 70-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 70-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 165

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

#### §§ 165.766-165.768 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Artemis International Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S.Stefanovich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.                                                      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                                                      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert S. Stefanovich |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  S. Stefanovich     |   |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer   |
|   | July  12, 2004             |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
AID IM 15-1

Formula Grants for Fiscal Year 2016

Legal and Related References:

Public Law 106-402, Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 

U.S.C. 15001 et seq).

& 

45 CFR Part 1385.8

Content:

The Final Rule of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 45 CFR 

Part 1385.8 (which applies to Sections 122 and 142 of the Act) has been modified (80 FR 44799). 

The formula for determining the allotments for the State Developmental Disabilities Councils and 

Protection & Advocacy Systems has been removed from regulation. For Fiscal Year 2016, AIDD 

will continue using the current formula for allotments. AIDD posted estimated allotments on April 

1, 2015 for Fiscal Year 2016 at http://acl.gov/About_ACL/Allocations/DD-Act.aspx. [link to be 

corrected when new page is built] Estimated allotments for Fiscal Year 2016 are based on Fiscal 

Year 2015 appropriation final amounts and do not reflect the current Congressional budget 

discussions.

In the fall of 2015, AIDD will release guidance seeking public comments for a new formula to be 

used in Fiscal Year 2017 and beyond. AIDD will respond to comments and release a final formula 

to meet statutory requirements and post estimated allotments by April 1, 2016 

at http://acl.gov/About_ACL/Allocations/DD-Act.aspx. [link to be corrected when new page is 

built]

AIDD grantees are required to follow all statutory and regulatory requirements (42 U.S.C 15001 et 

seq. & 45 CFR Parts 1385 through 1388).

The Fiscal Year 2016 allotments will be calculated using the below formula:
The Commissioner will allocate funds appropriated under the Act for the State Developmental 

Disabilities Councils and the Protection and Advocacy Systems on the following basis: 

(a) Two-thirds of the amount appropriated is allotted to each State according to the ratio the

population of each State bears relative to the population of the United States. This ratio is weighted 

by the relative per capita income for each State. The data used to compute allotments are supplied 

by the U.S. Department of Commerce, for the three most recent consecutive years for which 

satisfactory data are available. 

(b) One-third of the amount appropriated is allotted to each State on the basis of the relative need for

services of persons with developmental disabilities. The relative need is determined by the number 

of persons receiving benefits under the Childhood Disabilities Beneficiary Program (Section 

202(d)(1)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act), (42 U.S.C. 402(d)(1)(B)(ii)) as a percentage to working 

population (ages 18–64) of each State.
Exhibit


32.2








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George R. Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/x/ George Lefevre




Dated: August 19, 2009                                                                           By:


George Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer