alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 447 

Honoring Friendship Force International and recognizing March 1, 2008 

as World Friendship Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Friendship Force International and recognizing 

March 1, 2008 as World Friendship Day. 

Whereas the nonprofit organization Friendship Force International was founded in Atlanta in 1977 to promote 

international understanding and good will; 

Whereas, since 1977, nearly 1,000,000 individuals all over 

the world have traveled as Friendship Force Citizen Ambassadors or opened their homes as hosts in order to promote international understanding; 

Whereas, today, Friendship Force International has more 

than 35,000 members in 40 States and 58 foreign countries who are building bridges across the cultural barriers 

that separate people; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 447 IS 

Whereas, in order to celebrate on an annual basis its mission 

to support the cause of peace through international understanding, Friendship Force International has set 

March 1 of each year as World Friendship Day; and 

Whereas Friendship Force International chapters around the 

world are urging people everywhere to celebrate World 

Friendship Day on March 1, 2008: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors Friendship Force International for 

3 promoting international understanding and good will 

4 in the world; and 

5 (2) recognizes the celebration of World Friend6 ship Day on March 1, 2008, and asks people every7 where to mark and celebrate the day appropriately. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAPOUCHE EDMOND

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2057

[ January 2, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 562007CF005160A

.

Papouche Edmond, Jasper, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant

Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,398
<INVENTORY>                                     70,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,663
<PP&E>                                         117,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          653,159
<BONDS>                                         64,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,908
<OTHER-SE>                                    (269,499)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   454,698
<SALES>                                        575,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               575,324
<CGS>                                          371,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  570,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,054
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (308,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (308,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (308,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Robert Schulz et al., Appellants, v Virginia Galgano et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 9, 1996;

decided September 19, 1996

Appeal, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motions for a preliminary injunction and to hold respondent Galgano in contempt, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that that portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action / proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
§ 4041.25 Standard termination notice. ( a ) *Notice requirement.* The plan administrator must file with the PBGC a standard termination notice, consisting of the PBGC Form 500, completed in accordance with the instructions thereto, on or before the 180th day after the proposed termination date.
( b ) *Change of proposed termination date.* The plan administrator may, in the standard termination notice, select a proposed termination date that is later than the date specified in the notice of intent to terminate, provided it is not later than 90 days after the earliest date on which a notice of intent to terminate was issued to any affected party.
( c ) *Request for IRS determination letter.* To qualify for the distribution deadline in § 4041.28(a)(1)(ii), the plan administrator must submit to the IRS a valid request for a determination of the plan's qualification status upon termination (“determination letter”) by the time the standard termination notice is filed.
Exhibit 12.1



AIRBORNE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Dollars in thousands)



|                                    |  | Three Months Ended June 30 |       
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ------
|                                    |  | 2003                       |       
|EARNINGS:                           |  |                            |       
|Earnings (loss) before taxes        |  | $                          | 1,172 
|Fixed charges                       |  |                            | 13,268
|Less: Capitalized interest expense  |  |                            | (428  
|                                    |  |                            |       
|Total earnings                      |  | $                          | 14,012
|                                    |  |                            |       
|CALCULATION OF FIXED CHARGES:       |  |                            |       
|Net interest expense                |  | $                          | 7,485 
|Add: Capitalized interest expanses  |  |                            | 428   
|Add: Interest income                |  |                            | 1,506 
|                                    |  |                            |       
|Gross interest expense              |  |                            | 9,419 
|                                    |  |                           
|Discounts on sales of receivables   |  |                            | 885   
|Amortization of debt expense        |  |                            | 540   
|Rental expense:                     |  |                            |       
|Total                               |  |                            | 24,232
|Factor                              |  |                            | 10    
|                                    |  |                            |       
|Net interest component            |  |                            | 2,423 
|                                    |  |                            |       
|TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                 |  | $                          | 13,268
|                                    |  |                            |       
|RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES: |  |                            | 1.06
#### § 785.47 Where records show insubstantial or insignificant periods of time.

In recording working time under the Act, insubstantial or insignificant periods of time beyond the scheduled working hours, which cannot as a practical administrative matter be precisely recorded for payroll purposes, may be disregarded. The courts have held that such trifles are de minimis. (*Anderson* v. *Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.,* 328 U.S. 680 (1946)) This rule applies only where there are uncertain and indefinite periods of time involved of a few seconds or minutes duration, and where the failure to count such time is due to considerations justified by industrial realities. An employer may not arbitrarily fail to count as hours worked any part, however small, of the employee's fixed or regular working time or practically ascertainable period of time he is regularly required to spend on duties assigned to him. See *Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co.* v. *Culkin,* 197 F. 2d 981, 987 (C.A. 8, 1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 866 (1952), rehearing denied, 344 U.S. 888 (1952), holding that working time amounting to $1 of additional compensation a week is “not a trivial matter to a workingman,” and was not de minimis; *Addison* v. *Huron Stevedoring Corp.,* 204 F. 2d 88, 95 (C.A. 2, 1953), cert. denied 346 U.S. 877, holding that “To disregard workweeks for which less than a dollar is due will produce capricious and unfair results.” *Hawkins* v. *E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.,* 12 W.H. Cases 448, 27 Labor Cases, para. 69,094 (E.D. Va., 1955), holding that 10 minutes a day is not de minimis.
ecobuildingexh10_3.htm








Exhibit 10.3


 


 


ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFICIARY OF


STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT







To:                  ECO Building Products, Inc.


OTCBB: ECOB


909 West Vista Way


Vista, CA. 92083







Date:               6TH Day of July 2012












RE:                  Standby Letter of Credit #3


No: .......................897-117-3


Dated: To 17:00 GMT 12/04/2016







Issued by:     Bank of China Beijing


No. 1 Fuxingmen Nei Dajie


Beijing 100818


China







SWIFT Code:.............




 


 


The undersigned beneficiary (the Assignor) assigns to ECO Building Products, Inc. OTCBB: ECOB, 909 West Vista Way, Vista, 92083, all money now due and payable, or money that may become due and payable, to the assignor under the above referenced standby letter of credit as per the conditions of Standby Letter of Credit #3.  The above-referenced standby letter of credit is delivered to the Assignee with the execution of this assignment.







The Assignor warrants that it has received, as of the date of this assignment, no payments outside or under the above-referenced standby letter of credit, except for the following: none.  The Assignor further warrants that the amount here assigned is either due and owing or may become due and payable to the Assignor.







The Assignor here (1) authorizes and directs Bank of China Beijing to deliver to the Assignee any and all payments to be made to the Assignor once the conditions of the above referenced standby letter of credit are activated; (2) authorizes the Assignee to receive those payments, in whatever form made; and (3) authorizes the Assignee to sign on behalf of the Assignor any endorsements, receipts, or acknowledgments that may be required for the Assignee’s receipt of such payments as per the conditions of the above referenced standby letter of credit.







This assignment is executed this date [                               ]DATE.


 


 




	
 

	InsurFinancial Holdings, PLC	 
	 	(Reg: 05846021)	 
	 	Level 17	 
	 	Dashwood House	 
	 	69 Old Broad Street	 
	 	London, WEC2M 1QS	 
	 	United Kingdom	 
	 	 	 
	 Authorized Signature:   	/s/ James Patterson	 
	 	James Patterson	 
	 	Title: Director	 












Acceptance of this Assignment on behalf of ECO Building Products, Inc.:


 


 




	
 Authorized Signature:   

	/s/ Steve Conboy	 
	 	Steve Conboy	 
	 	Title: President & CEO	 
	 	 	 
	 	SEE ATTACHED ACKNOWLEDGMENT	 
	 	Verification or Notarization of Signatures
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1110 Security Zone: Coronado Bay Bridge, San Diego, CA. ( a ) *Location.* All navigable waters of San Diego Bay, from the surface to the sea floor, within 25 yards of all piers, abutments, fenders and pilings of the Coronado Bay Bridge. These security zones will not restrict the main navigational channel nor will it restrict vessels from transiting through the channel.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under § 165.33, entry into, transit through, loitering, or anchoring within any of these security zones by all persons and vessels is prohibited, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative. Mariners seeking permission to transit through a security zone may request authorization to do so from Captain of the Port or his designated representative. The Coast Guard can be contacted on San Diego Bay via VHF-FM channel 16.
( 2 ) Vessels may enter a security zone if it is necessary for safe navigation and circumstances do not allow sufficient time to obtain permission from the Captain of the Port.
[COTP San Diego 04-015, 69 FR 43915, July 23, 2004]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Kentucky Industries: A Study of Hours, Wages, and Working Conditions

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Manning, Caroline, 1876-1966					,	Robinson, Mary V. (Mary Viola)					,	Gordon, Mildred J.					 and 	Hyde, Elizabeth A. (Elizabeth Adshead), 1876-. 						*Women in Kentucky Industries: A Study of Hours, Wages, and Working Conditions : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 29*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1923,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5352,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**Exhibit
      35**





**CERTIFICATION**











I, David
      M.
      Davis, certify
      that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all other reports containing
      distribution information filed for the period covered by this annual
      report;





2.  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, the information in these reports does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
      to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading;





3.  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to
      the
      trustee by the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement is
      included in these reports; and





4.  I
      am
      responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the
      transition property servicing agreement and based upon the review required
      under
      the transition property servicing agreement the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the transition property servicing agreement.











Date:  March
      20,
      2007














/s/
                David M. Davis(David
                M. Davis, Vice President
              and
                Principal Financial Officer
              of
                TXU Electric Delivery Company)
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2006 ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: November 9, 2005
    /s/ Warren D. EdwardsWarren D. Edwards,Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc.
132 STAT. 4190 PUBLIC LAW 115–280—NOV. 29, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3554: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Nov. 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–280 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the effective date for the sunset for collateral requirements for Small 

Business Administration disaster loans. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSET FOR COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS 

FOR SBA DISASTER LOANS. 

Section 2102(b) of the RISE After Disaster Act of 2015 (15 

U.S.C. 636 note) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1), by striking ‘‘3 years’’ and inserting ‘‘4 years’’. 

Approved November 29, 2018. 

Nov. 29, 2018 

[S. 3554] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-109006-11]
RIN 1545-BK13


Modifications of Certain Derivative Contracts; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference 
to temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-109006-11) 
relating to whether an exchange for purposes of Sec.  1.1001-1(a) 
occurs for the nonassigning counterparty when there is an assignment of 
certain derivative contracts. It was published in the Federal Register 
on Friday, July 22, 2011 (76 FR 43957).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations, 
Andrea M. Hoffenson, (202) 622-3920 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under 
section 1001 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference 
to temporary regulations (REG-109006-11) contains errors that may prove 
to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking 
by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-109006-11), which was 
the subject of FR Doc. 2011-18531, is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 43957, column 2, in the preamble, under the caption FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:, second line, the language ``Andrea 
Hoffenson, (202) 622-3920'' is corrected to read ``Andrea M. Hoffenson, 
(202) 622-3920;''.
    2. On page 43957, column 4, in the preamble, under the paragraph 
heading ``Drafting Information'', third line, the language ``Office of 
Associate Chief Council'' is corrected to read ``Office of Associate 
Chief Counsel''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2011-21182 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
ANNUAL SERVICING CERTIFICATION

In connection with the loans serviced by FT Mortgage Companies during the fiscal
year December 31, 1999,  we confirm the  following to be materially  correct and
accurate to the best of our knowledge, information and belief:

1) Real estate taxes, special assessments and any charges that may become a lien
   upon the  property  and which  come due in the last  calendar  year have been
   paid.  This also  includes  the  verification  with  taxing  authorities  for
   non-escrowed mortgages.

2) FHA insurance premiums or private mortgage insurance premiums, if applicable,
   have been paid and are in full force and effect.

3) Properties are adequately insured and your interest, as Mortgagee is properly
   provided  for in the mortgage  clause.  This  includes  both flood and hazard
   insurance.

4) For those  loans  being  escrowed  for the  payment  of taxes and  insurance,
   sufficient  amounts  are being  collected  monthly to provide  for payment of
   future items.

5) Property  inspections have been completed  according to the provisions of our
   servicing agreement, if applicable.

6) All other provisions of the servicing agreement have been adhered to.

7) To the extent there exist any  exceptions to the foregoing that are deemed to
   be  material  in  nature,  such  exception(s)  will be  recited in an Exhibit
   attached  hereto and accompanied by an explanation  thereof.  In the event no
   Exhibit is attached  hereto,  it is to be presumed  that no  exceptions  of a
   material nature to the foregoing exist.


By: Sheryl Court
(Signature)
Sheryl Court
(Printed name)
Vice President
(Title)
3/23/00
(Date)