35770 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

(g) The State must provide an

assurance that, and information

describing the manner in which, the

program will expand and emphasize

consumer choice and control;

(h) The State must provide an

assurance that the State will supplement

and not supplant other Federal, State,

and local public funds expended to

provide any currently operating AFP in

the State;

(i) The State must provide an

assurance that the State will place all

funds that support the AFP, including

funds repaid during the life of the

program, in a permanent separate

account, apart from any other fund;

(j) The State must provide an

assurance that the State’s communitybased organization will invest funds in

low-risk securities in which a regulated

insurance company may invest under

the law of the State if the organization

administering funds invests funds

within this account;

(k) The State must provide an

assurance that the State’s communitybased organization will administer the

funds with the same judgement and care

that a person of prudence, discretion,

and intelligence would exercise in the

management of the financial affairs of

such person;

(l) The State must provide an

assurance that funds comprised of the

principal and interest from the State

account for this activity will be

available to support the AFP;

(m) The State must provide an

assurance that any interest or

investment income that accrues on or

derives from such funds after such

funds have been placed under the

control of the organization

administering the AFP, but before such

funds are distributed for purposes of

supporting the program, will be the

property of the organization

administering the program; and

(n) The State must provide an

assurance that the State will limit the

indirect costs of the total amount

available for the AFP to 10 percent,

including both the Federal and State

funds.

In addition to the statutory

requirements, each project must:

(a) Provide in accessible formats

materials that can be used by potential

loan applicants and lending institutions

to obtain, share and disseminate

information on loan availability,

eligibility requirements and procedures

and general loan related updates; and

(b) Coordinate and share information,

resources and with the State ATAct

projects.

(c) Conduct and submit to NIDRR and

the AFTAP an annual evaluation of its

activities using the data collection

instrument to be developed the AFTAP

described in Priority 2.

Priority 2: Alternative Financing

Technical Assistance Program

The Assistant Secretary establishes

AFTAP in order to assist States in

meeting the objectives of the AFP.

Consistent with the statutory

requirements, the AFTAP project must:

(a) Provide assistance to States

preparing applications for the AFP;

(b) Assist States to develop and

implement the AFP; and

(c) Provide any other information and

TA the Assistant Secretary determines

to be appropriate to assist States to

achieve the objectives of AFP.

In addition to the statutory

requirements, the AFPTA project must:

(a) Develop and implement a selfassessment instrument to determine the

effectiveness of the AFPTA;

(b) Provide in accessible formats

materials that contains useful and

replicable information on loan projects

and can be used by States under the

AFP and States planning to apply under

the AFP to improve the efficiency and

effectiveness of their loan projects

working closely with the National

Internet Project located at the Georgia

Institute on Technology;

(c) Develop a uniform data collection

instrument for use by the AFP that

includes, at a minimum, data on

features of loan programs and unique

characteristics and outcomes in order to

comply with annual reporting

requirements; and

(d) Share information and collaborate

with the TA programs funded under

Section 104 of the AT Act.

Electronic Access to This Document

You may review this document, as

well as all other Department of

Education documents published in the

Federal Register, in text or Adobe

Portable Document Format (PDF) on the

Internet at either of the following sites:

http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm

http://www.ed.gov/news.html

To use the PDF you must have the

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is

available free at either of the previous

sites. If you have questions about using

the PDF, call the U.S. Government

Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–

888–293–6498; or in the Washington,

D.C., area at (202) 512–1530.

Note: The official version of this document

is the document published in the Federal

Register. Free Internet access to the official

edition of the Federal Register and the Code

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO

access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/

index.html.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Number 84.224C, Assistive Technology Act

Alternative Loan Financing, Title III)

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3051–3058

Dated: May 31, 2000.

Judith E. Heumann,

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and

Rehabilitative Services.

[FR Doc. 00–13945 Filed 6–2–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA No.: 84.224C]

Office of Special Education and

Rehabilitative Services National

Institute on Disability and

Rehabilitation Research; Notice

Inviting Applications for New Awards

in Fiscal Years 2000–2001 for the

Alternative Financing Program (AFP),

and the Alternative Financing

Technical Assistance Program

(AFTAP), Both Authorized Under Title

III of the Assistive Technology Act

(ATAct)

Note to Applicants: This notice is a

complete application package. Together with

the statute authorizing the program and the

Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), this

notice contains information, application

forms, and instructions needed to apply for

a grant under these competitions.

These programs support the National

Education Goal that calls for all

Americans to possess the knowledge

and skills necessary to compete in a

global economy and exercise the rights

and responsibilities of citizenship.

The estimated funding levels in this

notice do not bind the Department of

Education to make awards in any of

these categories, or to any specific

number of awards or funding levels,

unless otherwise specified in statute.

Applicable Regulations: The

Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR),

34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 85,

and 86 and the Notice of Final Priority

published elsewhere in this issue of the

Federal Register.

Absolute Priorities: These

competitions focus on projects designed

to meet the absolute priorities in the

notice of final priority for these

programs, published elsewhere in this

issue of the Federal Register. Under 34

CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only

applications that meet one of the

absolute priorities.

Pre-Application Meeting: Interested

parties are invited to participate in a

pre-application meeting to discuss the

funding priorities for the AFP and the

AFTAP and to receive technical

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35771

assistance through individual

consultation and information about the

funding priorities. The pre-application

meeting will be held on June 16, 2000

either in person or by conference call at

the Department of Education, Office of

Special Education and Rehabilitative

Services, Switzer Building, Room 3065,

330 C St. SW, Washington, DC between

10 a.m. and 12 a.m. NIDRR staff will

also be available at this location from

1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. on that same day to

provide technical assistance through

individual consultation and information

about the funding priorities. For further

information or to make arrangements to

attend contact Carol Cohen, Switzer

Building, room 3420, 400 Maryland

Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20202.

Telephone (202) 205–5666. If you use a

Telecommunication Device for the Deaf

(TDD), you may call (202) 205–4475.

Assistance to Individuals With

Disabilities at the Public Meetings

The meeting site is accessible to

individuals with disabilities, and a sign

language interpreter will be available. If

you need an auxiliary aid or service

other than a sign language interpreter in

order to participate in the meeting (e.g.

other interpreting service such as oral,

cued speech, or tactile interpreter;

assistive listening device; or materials in

alternate format), notify the contact

person listed in this Notice at least two

weeks before the scheduled meeting

date. Although we will attempt to meet

a request we receive after this date, we

may not be able to make available the

requested auxiliary aid or service

because of insufficient time to arrange

it.

APPLICATION NOTICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000, ALTERNATIVE FINANCING PROGRAM AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCING

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, CFDA NO. 84.224C

Funding priority Deadline for transmittal of applications

Estimated

number of

awards

Award amount

(per year) 1 2

Project period

(months)

84.224C–1, Alternative Financing

Program.

July 28, 2000 .................................... 7 Outlying areas, maximum: $105,000;

State Minimum: $500,000; Average: $540,000; Range: $500,000

to $3,800,000 1.

12

84.224C–2, Alternative Financing

Technical Assistance Program.

July 28, 2000 .................................... 1 Year 1—200,000; Year 2—300,000 24

1 Note: The total amount available in FY 2000 for the AFP is $3,800,000. The Secretary is required to award a minimum of $500,000 to States

and to distribute any remaining funds among those States based on population and density. After award of $500,000 to seven States, the Secretary would have an additional $250,000 (approximately) to distribute among the seven States. If only four applications are approved for funding, the Secretary would distribute all available funds ($3.8 million) to those four applicants. Therefore, applicants are encouraged to apply for

(with full matching requirements) a grant award of up to $3.8 million, which is the amount available if only one State applies and receives an

award. The Secretary requires that the amount above the minimum of $500,000 shall be separable and clearly identified in the application, budget, and matching materials. 2The Secretary will reject without consideration or evaluation any application that proposes a project funding level that exceeds the stated

maximum award amount for fiscal year 2000 (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)).

Program Title: Alternative Financing

Program.

CFDA Number: 84.224C–1.

Purpose of Program: The purpose of

the AFP is to award grants to States to

pay for the Federal share of the cost of

the establishment and administration of,

or the expansion and administration of,

an AFP featuring one or more

alternative financing mechanisms to

allow individuals with disabilities and

their family members, guardians,

advocates, and authorized

representatives to purchase AT devices

and AT services.

Eligible Applicants: Parties eligible to

apply for the AFP are States and

outlying areas that receive or have

received grants under the AT State

Grant Program (section 101 of the

ATAct).

Matching Requirement: The Federal

share of the cost of the Alternative

Financing Program must not be more

than 50 percent. Therefore, because the

minimum Federal share is $500,000 for

States, States are required to match at

least $500,000. The match must be

provided with cash, from State, local, or

private sources. The State must match

at the exact level requested, $500,000 or

greater. The Federal share for an

outlying area would be $105,000;

requiring a $105,000 match.

Program Title: Alternative Financing

Technical Assistance Program.

CFDA Number: 84.224C–2.

Purpose of Program: The purpose of

the AFTAP is to award a grant to a

public or private agency or organization

to provide information and TA to States

participating in AFP.

Eligible Applicants: Parties eligible to

apply for grants under the AFTAP are

public or private agencies and

organizations, including institutions of

higher education with sufficient

documented experience, expertise and

capacity to assist States in the

development and implementation of the

AFPs carried out the ATAct. A State

receiving a grant under the ATP would

not be eligible for a grant under the

AFTAP.

Matching: No match is required.

Selection Criteria: The Secretary uses

the following selection criteria to

evaluate applications for priorities

under both the Alternative Financing

Program and the Alternative Financing

Technology Assistance Program. (See 34

CFR 75.210). The maximum score for all

the criteria is 100 points.

(a) Significance (10 points total). (1)

The Secretary considers the significance

of the proposed project; and

(2) In determining the significance of

the proposed project, the Secretary

considers the extent to which the results

of the proposed project are to be

disseminated in ways that will enable

others to use the information or

strategies.

(b) Quality of the project design (25

points total). (1) The Secretary considers

the quality of the design of the proposed

project; and (2) In determining the

quality of the design of the proposed

project, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the goals,

objectives, and outcomes to be achieved

by the proposed project are clearly

specified and measurable (8 points).

(ii) The extent to which the design of

the proposed project is appropriate to,

and will successfully address, the needs

of the target population or other

identified needs (8 points).

(iii) The extent to which the proposed

project represents an exceptional

approach to the priority or priorities

35772 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

established for the competition (6

points).

(iv) The extent to which the proposed

project will be coordinated with similar

or related efforts, and with other

appropriate community, State, and

Federal resources (3 points).

(c) Quality of project services (15

points total). (1) The Secretary considers

the quality of the services to be

provided by the proposed project;

(2) In determining the quality of the

services to be provided by the proposed

project, the Secretary considers the

quality and sufficiency of strategies for

ensuring equal access and treatment for

eligible proposed project participants

who are members of groups that have

traditionally been underrepresented

based on race, color, national origin,

gender, age, or disability (5 points); and

(3) In addition, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the services to

be provided by the proposed project are

appropriate to the needs of the intended

recipients or beneficiaries of those

services (5 points).

(ii) The extent to which the technical

assistance services to be provided by the

proposed project involve the use of

efficient strategies, including the use of

technology, as appropriate, and the

leveraging of non-project resources (5

points).

(d) Quality of project personnel (15

points total). (1) The Secretary considers

the quality of the personnel who will

carry out the proposed project;

(2) In determining the quality of

proposed project personnel, the

Secretary considers the extent to which

the applicant encourages applications

for employment from persons who are

members of groups that have

traditionally been underrepresented

based on race, color, national origin,

gender, age, or disability (5 points); and

(3) In addition, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The qualifications, including

relevant training and experience, of the

project director or principal investigator

(5 points).

(ii) The qualifications, including

relevant training and experience, of key

project personnel (5 points).

(e) Adequacy of resources (15 points

total). (1) The Secretary considers the

adequacy of resources for the proposed

project.

(2) In determining the adequacy of

resources for the proposed project, the

Secretary considers the following

factors:

(i) The adequacy of support, including

facilities, equipment, supplies, and

other resources, from the applicant

organization or the lead applicant

organization (8 points).

(ii) The extent to which the costs are

reasonable in relation to the objectives,

design, and potential significance of the

proposed project (7 points).

(f) Quality of the management plan

(10 points total). (1) The Secretary

considers the quality of the management

plan for the proposed project.

(2) In determining the quality of the

management plan for the proposed

project, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The adequacy of the management

plan to achieve the objectives of the

proposed project on time and within

budget, including clearly defined

responsibilities, timeliness, and

milestones for accomplishing project

tasks (5 points).

(ii) The extent to which the time

commitments of the project director and

principal investigator and other key

project personnel are appropriate and

adequate to meet the objectives of the

proposed project (5 points).

(g) Quality of the project evaluation

(10 points total). (1) The Secretary

considers the quality of the evaluation

to be conducted by the proposed

project.

(2) In determining the quality of the

evaluation, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the methods

of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and

appropriate to the goals, objectives, and

outcomes of the proposed project (5

points).

(ii) The extent to which the methods

of evaluation include the use of

objective performance measures that are

clearly related to the intended outcomes

of the project and will produce

quantitative and qualitative data to the

extent possible (5 points).

Instructions for Application

Narrative: The Assistant Secretary

strongly recommends the following:

(a) A one-page abstract;

(b) An application narrative (i.e., Part

III that addresses the selection criteria

that will be used by reviewers in

evaluating individual proposals) of no

more than 75 pages double-spaced (no

more than 3 lines per vertical inch) 8.5

x 11’’ pages (on one side only) with one

inch margins (top, bottom, and sides).

The application narrative page limit

recommendation does not apply to: Part

I—the electronically scannable form;

Part II—the budget section (including

the narrative budget justification); and

Part IV—the assurances and

certifications; and

(c) A font no smaller than a 12-point

font and an average character density no

greater than 14 characters per inch.

Instructions for Transmittal of

Applications:

(a) If an applicant wants to apply for

a grant, the applicant must—

(1) Mail the original and two copies

of the application on or before the

deadline date to: U.S. Department of

Education, Application Control Center,

Attention: (CFDA 84.224C–1 or C–2 and

the title), Washington, DC 20202–4725,

or

(2) Hand deliver the original and two

copies of the application by 4:30 p.m.

(Washington, DC time) on or before the

deadline date to: U.S. Department of

Education, Application Control Center,

Attention: (CFDA 84.224C–1 or C–2 and

the title), Room #3633, Regional Office

Building #3, 7th and D Streets, SW,

Washington, DC.

(b) An applicant must show one of the

following as proof of mailing:

(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service

postmark.

(2) A legible mail receipt with the

date of mailing stamped by the U.S.

Postal Service.

(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or

receipt from a commercial carrier.

(4) Any other proof of mailing

acceptable to the Secretary.

(c) If an application is mailed through

the U.S. Postal Service, the Secretary

does not accept either of the following

as proof of mailing:

(1) A private metered postmark.

(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by

the U.S. Postal Service.

Notes:

(1) The U.S. Postal Service does not

uniformly provide a dated postmark.

Before relying on this method, an

applicant should check with its local

post office.

(2) An applicant wishing to know that

the Department has received its

application must include with the

application a stamped self-addressed

postcard containing the CFDA number

and title of this program.

(3) The applicant must indicate on the

envelope and—if not provided by the

Department—in Item 10 of the

Application for Federal Assistance

(Standard Form 424) the CFDA

number—and letter, if any—of the

competition under which the

application is being submitted.

Application Forms and Instructions

The appendix to this application is

divided into four parts. These parts are

organized in the same manner that the

submitted application should be

organized. These parts are as follows:

Part I: Application for Federal

Assistance (Standard Form 424 (Rev.

11/12/99)) and instructions.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35773

Part II: Budget Form—NonConstruction Programs (Standard Form

524A) and instructions.

Part III: Application Narrative.

Additional Materials

Estimated Public Reporting Burden.

Assurances—Non-Construction

Programs (Standard Form 424B).

Certification Regarding Lobbying,

Debarment, Suspension, and Other

Responsibility Matters, and Drug-Free

Work-Place Requirements (ED Form 80–

0013).

Certification Regarding Debarment,

Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary

Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered

Transactions (ED Form 80–0014) and

instructions.

Note: ED Form GCS–014 is intended for the

use of primary participants and should not be

transmitted to the Department.

Certification of Eligibility for Federal

Assistance in Certain Programs (ED

Form 80–0016).

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

(Standard Form LLL (if applicable) and

instructions; and Disclosure Lobbying

Activities Continuation Sheet (Standard

Form LLL–A).

An applicant may submit information

on a Photostat copy of the application

and budget forms, the assurances, and

the certifications. However, the

application form, the assurances, and

the certifications must each have an

original signature. No grant may be

awarded unless a completed application

form has been received.

For Applications Contact: The Grants

and Contracts Service Team (GCST),

Department of Education, 400 Maryland

Avenue SW., room 3317 Switzer

Building, Washington, DC 20202, or call

(202) 205–8207. Individuals who use a

Telecommunications Device for the Deaf

(TDD) may call the TDD number at (202)

205–9860. The preferred method for

requesting information is to FAX your

request to (202) 205–8717.

Individuals with disabilities may

obtain a copy of the application package

in an alternate format by contacting the

GCST. However, the Department is not

able to reproduce in an alternate format

the standard forms included in the

application package.

For Further Information Contact:

Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW,

room 3414, Switzer Building,

Washington, DC 20202–2645.

Telephone: (202) 205–5880. Individuals

who use a Telecommunications device

for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD

number at (202) 205–4475. Internet:

Donna_Nangle@ed.gov

Individuals with disabilities may

obtain this document in an alternate

format (e.g., Braille, large print,

audiotape, or computer diskette) on

request to the contact person listed in

the preceding paragraph.

Electronic Access to This Document

You may review this document, as

well as all other Department of

Education documents published in the

Federal Register, in text or Adobe

Portable Document Format (PDF) on the

Internet at either of the following sites:

http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm

http://www.ed.gov/news.html

To use the PDF you must have the

Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with

Search, which is available free at either

of the previous sites. If you have

questions about using the PDF, call the

U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO),

toll free, at 1–888–293–6498; or in the

Washington, DC, area at (202) 512–1530.

Note: The official version of this document

is the document published in the Federal

Register. Free Internet access to the official

edition of the Federal Register and the Code

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO

access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/

index.html

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Number 84.224C, Assistive Technology Act

Alternative Loan Financing Program)

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3051–3058.

Dated: May 25, 2000.

Judith E. Heumann,

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and

Rehabilitative Services.

Appendix—Application Forms and

Instructions

Applicants are advised to reproduce and

complete the application forms in this

Section. Applicants are required to submit an

original and two copies of each application

as provided in this Section. However,

applicants are encouraged to submit an

original and seven copies of each application

in order to facilitate the peer review process

and minimize copying errors.

Frequent Questions

1. Can I Get an Extension of the Due Date?

No. On rare occasions the Department of

Education may extend a closing date for all

applicants. If that occurs, a notice of the

revised due date is published in the Federal

Register. However, there are no extensions or

exceptions to the due date made for

individual applicants.

2. What Should Be Included in the

Application?

The application should include a project

narrative, vitae of key personnel, and a

budget, as well as the Assurances forms

included in this package. Vitae of staff or

consultants should include the individual’s

title and role in the proposed project, and

other information that is specifically

pertinent to this proposed project. The

budgets for both the first year and all

subsequent project years should be included.

If collaboration with another organization

is involved in the proposed activity, the

application should include assurances of

participation by the other parties, including

written agreements or assurances of

cooperation. It is not useful to include

general letters of support or endorsement in

the application.

If the applicant proposes to use unique

tests or other measurement instruments that

are not widely known in the field, it would

be helpful to include the instrument in the

application.

Many applications contain voluminous

appendices that are not helpful and in many

cases cannot even be mailed to the reviewers.

It is generally not helpful to include such

things as brochures, general capability

statements of collaborating organizations,

maps, copies of publications, or descriptions

of other projects completed by the applicant.

3. What Format Should Be Used for the

Application?

NIDRR generally advises applicants that

they may organize the application to follow

the selection criteria that will be used. The

specific review criteria vary according to the

specific program, and are contained in this

Consolidated Application Package.

4. May I Submit Applications to More Than

One NIDRR Program Competition or More

Than One Application to a Program?

Yes. You may submit applications to any

program for which they are responsive to the

program requirements.

5. What Is the Allowable Indirect Cost Rate?

The limits on indirect costs vary according

to the program and the type of application.

In this case it is limited to 10%.

6. Can Profitmaking Businesses Apply for

Grants?

Only States may apply for the AFP and

there are specific eligibility requirements for

the TA project however, profitmaking entities

are eligible to apply for the AFTAP.

7. Can Individuals Apply for Grants?

No. Parties eligible to apply for the AFP are

States and outlying areas that receive or have

received grants under the AT State Grant

Program (section 101 of the ATAct).

8. How Soon After Submitting my

Application Can I Find Out if It Will Be

Funded?

The time from closing date to grant award

date varies from program to program.

Generally speaking, NIDRR endeavors to

have awards made within five to six months

of the closing date. Unsuccessful applicants

generally will be notified within that time

frame as well. For the purpose of estimating

a project start date, the applicant should

estimate approximately six months from the

closing date, but no later than the following

September 30 of the current fiscal year.

9. Can I Contact NIDRR To Find Out if My

Application Is Being Funded?

No. When NIDRR is able to release

information on the status of grant

applications, it will notify applicants by

letter. The results of the peer review cannot

35774 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

be released except through this formal

notification.

10. If My Application Is Successful, Can I

Assume I Will Get the Requested Budget

Amount in Subsequent Years?

No. Funding in subsequent years is subject

to availability of funds and project

performance.

11. Will All Approved Applications Be

Funded?

No. It often happens that the peer review

panels approve for funding more applications

than NIDRR can fund within available

resources. Applicants who are approved but

not funded are encouraged to consider

submitting similar applications in future

competitions if such competitions are held.

This would depend on subsequent

appropriations.

Public reporting burden for these

collections of information is estimated to

average 30 hours per response, including the

time for reviewing instructions, searching

existing data sources, gathering and

maintaining the data needed, and completing

and reviewing the collection of information.

Send comments regarding this burden

estimate or any other aspect of these

collections of information, including

suggestions for reducing this burden, to: the

U.S. Department of Education, Information

Management and Compliance Division,

Washington, DC 20202–4651; and to the

Office of Management and Budget,

Paperwork Reduction Project 1820–0027,

Washington, DC 20503.

Alternative Financing Program and the

Alternative Financing Technical Assistance

Program (CFDA No. 84.224C).

BILLING CODE 4000–01–U

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35775

35776 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35777

35778 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35779

35780 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35781

35782 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35783

35784 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35785

35786 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35787

35788 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices 35789

35790 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 108 / Monday, June 5, 2000 / Notices

[FR Doc. 00–13946 Filed 6–2–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–C