alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 714 

Honoring the firefighters and emergency workers who courageously fought 

fires in California in 2008. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2008 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the firefighters and emergency workers who 

courageously fought fires in California in 2008. 

Whereas, in 2008, there have been more than 10,000 

wildfires in California started by natural causes and 

human activity; 

Whereas more than 1,440,000 acres of Federal, State, and 

local land in California burned in 2008; 

Whereas, in June 2008, fires started by lightning strikes 

burned approximately 1,200,000 acres of Federal, State, 

and local land in California, making the June fires the 

largest single wildfire event in California’s recorded history; 

Whereas 41 counties across California were impacted by 

wildfires in 2008; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 714 ATS 

Whereas more than 1,400 homes were destroyed by fires in 

California in 2008; 

Whereas State and local firefighters have been called to duty 

for increasingly long fire seasons, working on the front 

lines of these fires for weeks; 

Whereas firefighters have risked their lives and endured great 

hardship to protect lives, property, and the environment 

in California; 

Whereas many firefighters were injured and 14 firefighters 

tragically lost their lives in California in 2008; 

Whereas 25,000 firefighters and emergency response personnel from California, 41 other States, and other nations worked side-by-side to fight the wildfires; 

Whereas members of the National Guard from California and 

other States provided essential support to the firefighting 

effort; and 

Whereas the people of California and the United States recognize the steadfast dedication of the firefighters 

throughout the ongoing fire suppression and subsequent 

repair and rebuilding efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the firefighters and emergency 

3 workers from California, 41 other States, and other 

4 nations for their courageous actions and sacrifices in 

5 fighting wildfires in California; 

6 (2) supports the continued work of firefighters 

7 to protect National Forest System land, other public 

8 lands, and private property from further damage; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 714 ATS 

1 (3) praises the people of California for their 

2 great courage in the face of the fires; and 

3 (4) extends heartfelt sympathy to the people 

4 who have lost loved ones, homes, and businesses in 

5 the wildfires. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00227-CV

Sattar Investments, Inc. and Adnan Sattar, Appellants

v.

Ingrid Radkey, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-16-011799, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellants Sattar Investments, Inc. and Adnan Sattar have filed an unopposed

motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant appellants’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: July 18, 2018
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 26, 2020

b0518 

# Order

Clerk May 26, 2020

160245

- 6

RAYMOND GUZALL, III, and

RAYMOND GUZALL, III, PC,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 160245

- 6

COA: 344507, 345190

Wayne CC: 18

- 000343

- CB

BARRY A. SEIFMAN and BARRY A.

SEIFMAN, PC,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Technical Q&A

# General

http://www.treasury.gov/ERAhttps://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USCFPB/subscriber/new?topic_id=USCFPB_127https://www.hudexchange.info/housing-and-homeless-assistance/https://consumerfinance.gov/covidrenthttps://consumerfinance.gov/renthelphttps://www.consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mortgage-and-housing-assistance/renter-protections/find-help-with-rent-and-utilities/?utm_source=vanity&utm_medium=outreach&utm_campaign=renthelphttps://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/emergency-rental-assistance-program/program-indexhttps://consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mortgage-and-housing-assistance/help-for-landlords/https://consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mortgage-and-housing-assistance/housing-insecurity-media-toolkithttps://www.consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mortgage-and-housing-assistance/help-for-homeowners/
#### § 780.811 Exemption dependent upon place of employment generally.

Under the first part of section 13(b)(15), if the employee's work meets the requirements for exemption, the location of the place of employment where he performs it will determine whether the exemption is applicable. This location is required to be in a county where cotton is grown in commercial quantities. The exemption will apply, however, to an employee who performs such work in “any” place of employment in such a county. The place of employment in which he engages in ginning need not be an establishment exclusively or even principally devoted to such operations; nor is it important whether the place of employment is on a farm or in a town or city in such a county, or whether or to what extent the cotton ginned there comes from the county in which the ginning is done or from nearby or distant sources. It is enough if the place of employment where the employee is engaged in ginning cotton for market is “located” in such a county.
**Sample Older Americans Month Article**

You can use this sample drop-in article as a model for raising awareness and encouraging participation in Older Americans Month 2014. Use it as a template to write your own article, or just insert it into your organization’s May newsletter.

**Older Americans Month 2014**

**Safe Today. Healthy Tomorrow.**

Older adults have made countless contributions and sacrifices to ensure a better life for future generations.  Since 1963, communities across the country have shown their gratitude by celebrating Older Americans Month each May. This celebration recognizes older Americans for their contributions and demonstrates our nation’s commitment to helping them stay healthy and active.

This year’s theme for Older Americans Month is “Safe Today. Healthy Tomorrow.” The theme focuses on injury prevention and safety to encourage older adults to protect themselves and remain active and independent for as long as possible.

Unintentional injuries to this population result in at least 6 million medically treated injuries and more than 30,000 deaths every year. With an emphasis on safety during Older Americans Month, we encourage older adults to learn about the variety of ways they can avoid the leading causes of injury, like falls.

While [ORGANIZATION NAME] provides services, support, and resources to older adults year-round, Older Americans Month offers an opportunity for us to provide specialized information and services around the important topic of injury prevention. This information will help older adults take control of their safety and live longer, healthier lives.

Throughout the month, [ORGANIZATION NAME] will be conducting activities and providing tips on how to avoid the leading causes of injury. To learn more about Older Americans Month and how you can participate, contact [INSERT ORGANIZATION CONTACT INFORMATION] and follow us on **[Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest if applicable]**. 

Contact your local Area Agency on Aging office by visiting www.eldercare.gov or calling 1 (800) 677-1116 to find ongoing opportunities to celebrate and support older Americans.
§ 154.2102 Facility requirements for vessel liquid overfill protection. This section does not apply to facilities collecting vapors emitted from vessel cargo tanks while inerting, padding, or purging the cargo tanks with an inert gas and not loading cargo into the cargo tank. ( a ) Each facility that receives cargo vapor from a tank barge that is fitted with overfill protection, in accordance with 46 CFR 39.2009(a)(1)(iii), must provide a 120-volt, 20-amp explosion-proof receptacle for the overfill protection system that meets— ( 1 ) ANSI NEMA WD-6 (incorporated by reference, see 33 CFR 154.106);
( 2 ) NFPA 70 (2011), Articles 406.9 and 501.145 (incorporated by reference, see 33 CFR 154.106); and
( 3 ) 46 CFR 111.105-9.
( b ) Each facility that receives cargo vapor from a tank barge that is fitted with an intrinsically safe cargo tank level sensor system complying with 46 CFR 39.2009(a)(2), as a means of overfill protection, must have an overfill control system on the dock capable of powering and receiving an alarm and shutdown signal from the cargo tank level sensor system that— ( 1 ) Closes the remotely operated cargo vapor shutoff valve required by 33 CFR 154.2101(a) and activates the emergency shutdown system required by 33 CFR 154.550 when— ( i ) A tank overfill signal is received from the barge; or
( ii ) Electrical continuity of the cargo tank level sensor system is interrupted;
( 2 ) Activates an audible and visible alarm that warns barge and facility personnel when a tank overfill signal, or an optional high-level signal corresponding to a liquid level lower than the tank overfill sensor setting, is received from the barge;
( 3 ) Has a mechanism to test the alarms and automatic shutdown systems electrically and mechanically before operating the vapor control system (VCS);
( 4 ) Has suitable means, such as approved intrinsic safety barriers able to accept passive devices, so that the overfill and optional alarm circuits on the barge side of the overfill control system, including cabling, normally closed switches, and pin and sleeve connectors, are intrinsically safe;
( 5 ) Is labeled at the dock with the maximum allowable inductance (in millihenrys) and capacitance (in microfarads) to be connected to the facility overfill protection system as specified by the equipment manufacturer; and
( 6 ) Has a female connecting plug for the tank barge level sensor system with a five-wire, 16-ampere connector body meeting IEC 60309-1 and IEC 60309-2 (both incorporated by reference, see 33 CFR 154.106), that is— ( i ) Configured with pins S2 (N) and R1 (L3) for the tank overfill sensor circuit, pin G connected to the cabling shield, and pins N (L2) and T3 (L1) reserved for an optional high-level alarm connection;
( ii ) Labeled “Connector for Barge Overfill Control System”; and
( iii ) Connected to the overfill control system by a shielded flexible cable.
#### § 779.263 Excise taxes not at the retail level.

There are also a wide variety of taxes levied at the manufacturer's or distributor's level and not at the retail level. It should be noted, however, that the circumstances surrounding the levying and collection of taxes must be carefully considered. The facts concerning the levying and collection of Federal excise taxes on alcoholic beverages and tobacco reflect that such taxes are upon the manufacture of these products and that they are neither levied nor collected at the retail level and thus are not excludable. However, in some cases the circumstances may reflect that despite the fact that such taxes may be levied upon the manufacturer or distributor, nevertheless they may be, in practical operation, taxes at the retail level and may be so regarded for the purpose of this provision.
#### Nathan Friedman, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Sabina Friedman, Deceased, Appellant, v Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P. C., et al., Defendants, and Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, Respondent.

Submitted August 5, 1996;

decided October 17, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellant’s motion for leave to file a second *1053amended complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[GA-T5-2000-01b; FRL-6711-1]


Clean Air Act Proposed Full Approval of Operating Permit Program; 
Georgia

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes full approval of the operating permit program of 
the State of Georgia. In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's operating permit program as a 
direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this 
as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. An 
explanation for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If 
no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further 
activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct 
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments will be addressed 
in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received by July 10, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Address comments to Kim Pierce, Regional Title V Program 
Manager, Operating Source Section, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, 
EPA, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Copies of the 
State's submittals and other supporting documentation relevant to this 
action are available for inspection during normal business hours at 
EPA, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Pierce, EPA, Region 4, at (404) 
562-9124.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule which is published in the final rules section of this 
Federal Register.

    Dated: May 15, 2000.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 00-14167 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

The Board of Directors

SummaIndustries:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 pertaining to the Company’s 1984 and 1991 Stock Option Plans, filed onApril 15, 1993, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed on January 31, 1997 (No.333-20835), the amendment to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15,1998 (No. 333-68921), the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998(No. 333-68981), the amendment to the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on  May 3, 2002 (No. 333-87692), the Summa ESOPand 401(k) Stock Option Plan, filed on September 8, 1997 (No. 333-35163), theCalnetics Stock Option Plan, filed on October 21, 1997(No. 333-38415), theFalcon Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998 (No.333-68983), the Plastron Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on May 20, 1999(No. 333-78873), the Plastic Specialties, Inc. Acquisition Stock Option Planfiled on May 3, 2002 (No. 333-87690), and the previously filed RegistrationStatement on Form S-4 pertaining to the LexaLite Stock Option Plan, filed onSeptember 9, 1996 (No. 333-11571), of Summa Industries and subsidiaries of ourreports dated October 7, 2002, except for note 17, which is as of July 9, 2003,with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Summa Industries andsubsidiaries as of August 31, 2002, and the related statements of income,stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and our report onSchedule II “Valuation and Qualifying Accounts,” which reports appear in thefiscal year 2002 annual report on Form 10-K/A.

 

Our report on the consolidatedfinancial statements refers to the Company’s restatement of its disclosurerelated to its reportable segments and to our audit of the adjustments thatwere applied to revise the disclosures for reportable segments for the 2001 and2000 consolidated financial statements, as more fully described in Note 17 tothe consolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any proceduresto the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements other than with respectto such adjustments.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP             |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| KPMG LLP                 |
|                     |
|                     |
| Los Angeles,  California |
| July 17, 2003            |

 

----
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–87 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES 

APRIL 27, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 365] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 365, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolution reported on the legislative day of April 28, 2009, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth the congressional 

budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2009, and 

setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2011 

through 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC70 with REPORTS
#### § 155.5012 Deviation from response plan.

The owner or operator of a nontank vessel required to have a vessel response plan (VRP) under this subpart may not deviate from the approved VRP unless the President or Federal On-Scene Coordinator determines that the deviation from the VRP would provide for a more expeditious or effective response to the spill or mitigation of its environmental effects.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

DONALD J. TRUMP, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

 / 

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Fred Wertheimer, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that: 

 The Motion is GRANTED. Fred Wertheimer, may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Amici Curiae. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic 

filings to Fred Wertheimer at fwertheimer@democracy21.org. 

 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 47-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this _____ day of 

_________________, 2022. 

 __________________________ 

 AILEEN M. CANNON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 47-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 683 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 683

    Designating the week of October 19 through October 25, 2008, as 
         ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 24 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Reed (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Bond, Mr. 
 Isakson, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Levin, Mr. Biden, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Kerry, 
 Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Pryor, and Mr. 
 Lautenberg) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating the week of October 19 through October 25, 2008, as 
         ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

Whereas lead poisoning is one of the leading environmental health hazards facing 
        children in the United States;
Whereas approximately 240,000 children in the United States under the age of 6 
        currently have harmful levels of lead in their blood;
Whereas lead poisoning may cause serious, long-term harm to children, including 
        reduced intelligence and attention span, behavior problems, learning 
        disabilities, and impaired growth;
Whereas children from low-income families are significantly more likely to be 
        poisoned by lead than are children from high-income families;
Whereas children may be poisoned by lead in water, soil, housing, or consumable 
        products;
Whereas children most often are poisoned in their homes through exposure to lead 
        particles when lead-based paint deteriorates or is disturbed during home 
        renovation and repainting; and
Whereas lead poisoning crosses all barriers of race, income, and geography: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of October 19 through October 25, 
        2008, as ``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''; 
        and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week with 
        appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```