alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-12-425-E 

June 12, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10558 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0607 

Mr. Peter Swift 

Chief Pilot 

Snohomish Flying Service, Inc. 

9900 Airport Way, Harvey Field (S43) 

Snohomish, WA 98296 

Dear Mr. Swift: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 30, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Snohomish Flying Service, Inc. (SFS) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow SFS to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SFS. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 
2 

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Snohomish Flying Service, Inc. an exemption from 

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow SFS to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations 

described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of SFS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the SFS part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

James R Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008
of K-Tron International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):




---



##### 



Date:      August 4, 2008
    EDWARD B. CLOUES, IIEdward B. Cloues, IIChairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51064-51065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21132]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice

    The National Science Board (NSB) Committee on Audit and Oversight 
and the NSB Committee on Strategy and Budget, pursuant to NSF 
regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of NSB business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Monday, August 29, 2011 at 4 p.m.-5 p.m., E.D.T.

SUBJECT MATTER: Review, discussion and recommendation of the NSF FY 
2013 budget.

STATUS: Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
National Science Board Office, National

[[Page 51065]]

Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/) for information or schedule updates, or 
contact: Kim Silverman or Blane Dahl, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Ann Ferrante,
Writer-Editor.
[FR Doc. 2011-21132 Filed 8-15-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit
      99(c)





QUARTERLY
      AFFIRMATION STATEMENT








This
      Quarterly Statement is being provided pursuant to the requirement of Section
      3.07(h)VIII of that certain Indenture dated as of August 21, 2003 between TXU
      Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (the “Transition Bond Company”),
      as Issuer, and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, (as originally
      executed and, as from time to time supplemented or amended by one or more Series
      Supplements or indentures supplemental thereto entered into pursuant to the
      applicable provisions of the Indenture, as so supplemented or amended, or both,
      the “Indenture”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
      herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Appendix A of the
      Indenture.





I,
      John
      M. Casey, hereby certify that I am the Assistant Treasurer of TXU Electric
      Delivery Company (“TXUED”), the parent company of the Transition Bond Company,
      and the servicer of the transition bonds under that certain Series 2003-1
      Transition Property Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2003 and that
      certain Series 2004-1 Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as of June
      7, 2004 between the Transition Bond Company and TXUED.





I
      hereby
      affirm that, in all material respects, for each materially significant REP
      for
      which TXUED provided electric delivery transmission and distribution services
      for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2006, (a) each REP has been
      billed in compliance with the requirements outlined in the Financing Order;
      (b)
      each REP has made payments in compliance with the requirements outlined in
      the
      Financing Order; and (c) each REP satisfies the creditworthiness requirements
      of
      the Financing Order.














/s/
                John M. CaseyJohn
                M. Casey
#### Barker *et al. v.*The State.

Submitted December 17, 1906.

Decided January 15, 1907.

Petition fox certiorari. Before Judge Mitchell. Tift superior court. October 3, 1906.

Lumpkin, J.

1. That a person accused of a crime does not make a statement is not a proper subject of comment by the prosecuting attorney; nor should he, in the presence of the jury, call on the prisoner’s counsel for an explanation of the failure to make a statement. Where this has-been done, on application duly made the court should grant a mistrial, or at least obviate any injurious effects by appropriate instructions, if this be practicable. *Minor*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*490; *Caesar*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*6.

2. Evidence that an accused person played cards, with nothing to show that money or other thing of value .was bet, will not warrant a verdict convicting him of gaming.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J.,*absent.

*277Barker and Bell excepted to the refusal of the judge of the .superior court to sanction their petition for certiorari. From the petition it appeared, that the petitioners were convicted in the city court of Tifton, under an accusation of gaming, and that the evidence introduced on the trial was to the effect that police officers discovered them at night in a closed house, playing a game of cards named “five up,” but that po money was seen. It appeared also that the prosecuting attorney, in his argument to the jury, said) that while he was not allowed to comment on the failure of the defendants to make a statement, he would call on Mr. Smith (their •attorney) to explain it in his closing argument to the jury; that the defendants’ attorneys objected to this statement of the prosecuting attorney and requested him to withdraw it, but he refused to do so, and they were asked by the court not to interrupt the argument again.. The petition alleges, among other assignments of error, that the verdict was without evidence to support it, and that the court erred in failing to declare a mistrial, or rebuke the prosecuting attorney, or instruct the jury in reference to his remark as .above set out.

*G. G. Ilall*and *B. D. Smith,*for plaintiffs in error.

*W. H. Thomas, solicitor-general,*contra.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)


CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No. 33-59007) pertaining to The Mead Corporation Employees Stock
Purchase Plan, (ii) the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No. 2-90746) pertaining to the 1984 Stock Option Plan, (iii) the Form
S-8 Registration Statements (Nos. 33-37961 and 33-47580) pertaining to the Mead
Salaried Savings Plan, (iv) the Form S-3 Registration Statements (Nos. 33-14759
and 33-34009) pertaining to Common Shares of Selling Shareholders, (v) the Form
S-3 Registration Statements (Nos. 33-43994, 33-51337 and 333-16135) pertaining
to $850,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Debt Securities, (vi) the Form S-8
Registration Statement (No. 33-40118) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan,
(vii) the Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 33-03047) pertaining to the 1996
Stock Option Plan, (viii) the Form S-3 Registration Statement (No. 333-16221)
pertaining to transferred stock options, and (ix) the Form S-8 Registration
Statement (No. 33-53421) pertaining to the Mead Savings Plan for Bargaining Unit
Employees, and Prospectus pertaining to Common Shares of Selling Shareholders,
included in such Registration Statement, of our report dated January 23, 1997,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Mead Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dayton, Ohio
March   , 1997

                                      69
Exhibit 99.1



In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of StorageNetworks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    PAUL C.
FLANAGANPaul C. Flanagan Chief Executive Officer




Dated:  May 9, 2003





By:

/s/    SCOTT J.
DUSSAULTScott J. Dussault Chief Financial Officer




Dated:  May 9, 2003



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to StorageNetworks, Inc. and will be retained by StorageNetworks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
  Section 906 Certification
 
 
 The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the MLM Index TM
Fund.
 
 
 August 12, 2009By: /s/ James A. MehlingVice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial OfficerMount Lucas Management Corporation,the manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1331

___________ Alvin Bernal Jackson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 14, 2007 Filed: November 20, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In light of this court’s recent decision in Simpson v. Norris , 490 F.3d 1029, 1034-1036 (8th Cir. 2007) (concluding the existence of an Arkansas statute that precluded the execution of the mentally re tarded was irrelevant to whether the applicant had defaulted an Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304, 321 (2002), claim by failing to bring the claim under the statute), reh’g en banc denied , No. 06-2823 (8th Cir. Aug. 20, 2007), we reverse and vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district c ourt for further proceedings. SeeSimpson , 490 F.3d at 1035-36.

______________________________
§ 162.136 Connecting waters from Lake Huron to Lake Erie; anchorage grounds. ( a ) In the Detroit River, vessels shall be anchored so as not to swing into the channel or across steering courses. Note:
There is an authorized anchorage in Canadian waters just above Fighting Island and an authorized anchorage in U.S. waters south of Belle Isle (33 CFR 110.206).
( b ) In the St. Clair River, vessels shall be anchored so as not to swing into the channel or across steering courses.
[CGD 78-151, 49 FR 18302, Apr. 30, 1984, as amended by CGD 85-060, 51 FR 17016, May 8, 1986]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; The Effect of Supervised 
Practice Driving on Driving Performance Among Newly Licensed Teen 
Drivers.
    Date: September 15, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of, Child Health and Human Development, NIH 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5b01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6680, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbb8a0aaa5afaab8aa8ba6aaa2a7e5a5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="21524a404f45405240614c40484d0f4f48490f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 17, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-21510 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FOR M A

UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FILED By- j/ D.c.

AIJC 232222

ANGEL.A fi,soBuE

cLERKuae,.nIs'ccT,

s.D.oFFuA.:7:I-ALID.

CASE NO.22-cv-81294-AM C

IntheM atteroftheSearchof

M ar-a-Lago

1100S.OceanBlvd.

Palm Beach,FL 33480

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING

Please take notice thatthe foregoing M otion to AppearPro Hac Pv c forM Evan

Corcoran,ConsenttoDesignation,andRequesttoElectronicallyReceiveNoticesofElectronic

Filing(theGM otion''lisbeingfiledconventionallybecauseatechnicalissuewithaccesstothe

Court'sCM /ECF system precludedelectronictllingtoday,atldtheCM /ECF HelpDesk advised

undersignedcounseltofleconvenéonally.

Dated:August23,2022 Respectfullysubmitted,

/s/LindseyHalligan

LindseyHalligmz

FloridaBarNo.109481

511SE 5111Avenue

FortLauderdale,FL 33301

Email:lindseyhaligan@outlookacom

/s/JamesM .Trustv

Jam eqM .Tnzsty

IfrahLaw PLLC

1717PennsylvaniaAve.N.W .Suite650

W mshington,DC 20006

Telephone:(202)524-4176

Email:jtnzsty@ifrahlaw.com

+rohacvicesledcontemporaneouslyj

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2022 Page 1 of 2
/s/M .EvanCorcoran

M .Evan Corcorarl

SILVEU M IY OMPSONISLUTG IM ITE,LLC

400EastPrattStreet- Stlite900

Baltimore,M D 21202

Telephone:(410)385-2225

Email:ecorcorr@silvermrthompson.com

+roàtzcvicenledcontemporaneously)

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2022 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1045 Hood Canal. The draw of the Washington State pontoon highway bridge near Port Gamble operates as follows: ( a ) The draw shall open on signal if at least one hour's notice is given. The draw shall be opened horizontally for 300 feet unless the maximum opening of 600 feet is requested.
( b ) The draw of the Hood Canal Bridge, mile 5.0, need not open for vessel traffic from 3 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. daily from 3 p.m. May 22 to 6:16 p.m. September 30, except for commercial tug and tow vessels and vessels of the U.S. Navy or vessels attending the missions of the U.S. Navy and other public vessels of the United States. At all other times the bridge will operate in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Telephone requests for bridge openings may be directed as collect calls to the Toll Office at the bridge site. The call may also be made by direct telephone communication through the Seattle Marine Operator, Station KOH, or through other marine wire or radio telephone service.
( d ) During unusual or emergency periods, the authorized representative of the owner of or agency controlling the bridge shall open the draw on a demand basis for specified periods of time, normally not exceeding 48 hours, when requested by the Department of the Navy. While on a demand basis, a drawtender shall be in attendance on the bridge with radio communication equipment in operation.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD13 84-13, 49 FR 35628, Sept. 11, 1984; CGD13-95-011, 62 FR 43097, Aug. 12, 1997; USCG-2012-0074, 77 FR 28769, May 16, 2012]
§ 140.40 Processing penalty cases. Apparent violations of the regulations in this subchapter are processed in accordance with subpart 1.07 of 33 CFR part 1 on civil and criminal penalty proceedings, except as follows: ( a ) The District Commander refers civil penalty cases to the Secretary of the Interior, or that person's delegate, who, under the Act, assesses, collects, and compromises civil penalties.
( b ) If a possible violation investigated by the Coast Guard carries both a civil and a criminal penalty, the District Commander determines whether to refer the case to the U.S. Attorney for criminal prosecution or to the Secretary of the Interior, or that person's delegate, for civil penalty proceedings.
( c ) When the U.S. Attorney declines to institute criminal proceedings, the District Commander decides whether to refer the case to the Secretary of the Interior, or that person's delegate, for civil penalty proceedings or to close the case.
EXHIBIT 10.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF DONALD W. BUSBY




                                      -103-

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 10.1
                                  ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hilton Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending May 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald W. Busby, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Donald W. Busby
-----------------------
Donald W. Busby,
Chief Executive Officer

                                      -104-

<PAGE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.61 Vents.

Vents must be designed and constructed to minimize clogging by either the contents of the tank or climatic conditions such as snow or ice.