alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the acompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tamalpais Bancorp for the
year ended December 31, 2008, I, Mark Garwood, Chief Executive Officer of
Tamalpais Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | such Annual
  Report on Form 10-K of Tamalpais Bancorp for the year ended December 31,
  2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,                                      
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | the
  information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tamalpais Bancorp
  for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tamalpais
  Bancorp.

|                        |                                       
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------
|Dated: March
  27, 2009 | /s/ MARK
  GARWOOD                    
|                        |                                       
|                        | Mark
  Garwood,                       
|                        | Director and
  Chief Executive Officer
|                        | (Principal
  Executive Officer)       

---
Submitted on appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed July 21 and on respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed September 18; appellant’s petition for reconsideration denied,

respondent’s petition for reconsideration allowed, opinion (114 Or App 17, 834 P2d 458) modified and adhered to as modified December 30, 1992,

appellant’s petition for review denied February 23 (315 Or 443),

respondent’s petition for review allowed February 23, 1993 (315 Or 442)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*CHARLES WILLARD BELLEK, *Appellant.*

(90051007; CA A68579)

844 P2d 937

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Eric R. Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for appellant’s petition.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondent’s petition.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*538PER CURIAM

Both parties petition for review of our opinion. 114 Or App 17,834 P2d 458 (1992). Treating the petitions as ones for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), we deny defendant’s and grant the state’s. Defendant had been sentenced to life imprisonment, pursuant to ORS 163.115(3)(a), and to 121 months under the guidelines. We held that it was error to impose life imprisonment and remanded for resentencing.

In *State v. Morgan,*116 Or App 338, 345, 842 P2d 406 (1992), we said:

> “In *State v. Bellek, supra,*we held that ORS 137.637 requires the court to impose at least 121 months in prison under the guidelines. On further analysis, we are unable to reconcile the provisions of ORS 163.115(3) with the guidelines rules and the statutes. ORS 137.637 does not control ORS 163.115(3)(b) if it does not control ORS 163.115(3)(c). We conclude that ORS 163.115(3) has been superseded in its entirety by the guidelines. *See State v. Shumway,*291 Or 153, 630 P2d 796 (1981).”

We modify our opinion, consistently with *State v. Morgan, supra,*and adhere to it as modified. However, that modification does not require resentencing on the 121-month term, which is within the presumptive guidelines sentence.

Appellant’s petition for reconsideration denied; respondent’s petition for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
**Exhibit 10.3.2**

** **

**Promissory Note**

 

Dated:  September 1,1999

 

Opus360Corporation (the “Company”) has loaned to Ari Horowitz (the “Employee”) the sumof Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000). The Employee promises to pay to the Company the sum of Twenty ThousandDollars ($20,000), on demand, with interest at the rate of seven percent (7%)per annum, compounded annually, accruing on the unpaid balance from the datehereof to the date of payment.

 

In any action to collect anypayment due under this Promissory Note, the Company shall be entitled torecover all of its expenses incurred in connection with such action, including,without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs.

 

Witness my hand and seal as ofthis 1st day of September 1999.

 

 
| The Employee: |         |   |   |
|---------------|--------------|--------|--------|
|          | Ari Horowitz |   |   |

 

----
§ 158.100 Purpose. This part establishes the following: ( a ) Criteria for determining the adequacy of reception facilities.
( b ) Procedures for certifying that reception facilities are adequate for receiving— ( 1 ) Oily mixtures from oceangoing tankers and any other oceangoing ships of 400 gross tons or more;
( 2 ) NLS residue from oceangoing ships; or
( 3 ) Garbage from ships.
( c ) Standards for ports and terminals to reduce NLS residue.
[CGD 85-010, 52 FR 7761, Mar. 12, 1987, as amended by CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18407, Apr. 28, 1989; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]
**Exhibit 10.7**

|                                             |   |                              |   |                 |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
| **Name**                                         |   | **Position**                      |   | **2006   Bonus (1)** |
|                                                  |   |                                   |   |                      |
| Kit M. Cole                                      |   | Chief   Executive Officer         |   | 49,984               |
|                                             |   |                              |   |                 |
| Mark Garwood                                     |   | President/                        |   | 85,687               |
|                                             |   | Chief   Executive Officer         |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Tamalpais   Bank                  |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Interim   Chief Executive Officer |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Epic Wealth   Management          |   |                 |
|                                             |   |                              |   |                 |
| Michael   Moulton                                |   | Chief   Financial Officer         |   | 37,722               |
|                                             |   | Executive   Vice President,       |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Chief   Financial Officer         |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Tamalpais   Bank                  |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Chief   Financial Officer         |   |                 |
|                                             |   | Epic Wealth   Management          |   |                 |
|                                             |   |                              |   |                 |
|                                                  |
| (1) Paid in   2006 but based on 2005 performance |
NUMBER 13-18-00243-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

YVETTE HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

FIRST BANK D/B/A FIRST BANK 

MORTGAGE, ITS SUCCESSORS 

AND ASSIGNS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court

of Willacy County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez

Appellant, Yvette Hernandez, appealed a judgment entered by the County Court

of Willacy County, Texas. On May 29, 2018 and June 13, 2018, the Clerk of this Court 

notified appellant, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we 

would dismiss this appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid within ten days from 
2

receipt of the letter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not responded to the 

notices from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to pay 

the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b), (c). 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

Justice 

Delivered and filed the

26th day of July, 2018.
null

2010-05-18

122.23681

eng - Argued: 2010-05-18. Docket number: 3-09-0470
PUBLIC LAW 115–281—DEC. 1, 2018 132 STAT. 4191 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 7187: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Nov. 29, considered and passed House and Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–281 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 7, 2018. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Further Extension Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

(a) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking 

‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

(b) PROGRAM EXPIRATION.—Section 1319 of the National Flood 

Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 

‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

Approved December 1, 2018. 

National Flood 

Insurance 

Program Further 

Extension Act 

of 2018. 

42 USC 4001 

note. 

Dec. 1, 2018 

[H.R. 7187]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-065] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, ORIGINS Subcommittee. 

# DATES:

Tuesday, June 13, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Wednesday, June 14, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, SW, Program Review Center (PRC) 9H40 Washington, DC, 20546.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Anne L. Kinney, Code S, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0362. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics: 

—Next Generation Space Telescope 

—Discussion on Wide Field Camera 3 

—Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Archive Nexus 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: May 30, 2000.

Matthew M. Crouch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-14040 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### Hahn v. Roller.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*March 12, 1874.)*

Bonds — Perfect on Face — Delivery in Escrow — Estoppel.*

A bond which is a complete and perfect instrument on its face at the time of its delivery to the obligee, was executed by a person as surety, upon the condition that it should not be delivered until executed by another person, and it was placed in the hands of the principal obligor, and without being so executed it was delivered by the obligor to his obligee, who was not informed of the condition : *held,*the bond is the valid bond of the surety, and he cannot set up the condition against the obligee.

Appeal from circuit court of Rockingham county.

*George G.*Grattan, counsel for appellant.

*John E.*Roller, counsel for appellee.,

*

See foot-note to Nash *v.*Fugate, 24 Gratt. 202; monographic note on “Bonds” appended to Ward *v.*Churn, 18 Gratt. 801.

Staples, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error instituted an. action of debt in the circuit court of Rockingham county against Peter S. Roller, upon a writing obligatory executed by him and Josiah S. Roller.

*45The defendant filed two pleas in writing setting forth substantially that he signed and sealed that writing which is the subject of controversy, and delivered the same to his obligor, Josiah S. Eoller, the principal, as an escrow, upon the condition that if Peter Eoller should execute the same as security, then the same should be delivered as the deed of the defendant, and not otherwise, and the same was never executed by the said Peter Eoller.

Upon these pleas issue was joined, and the parties agreed the facts in lieu of a special verdict. And upon these facts the court gave judgment for the defendant.

The case is before us upon a writ of error to that judgment.

It is proper to observe that the instrument is complete on its face, and the facts agreed show that the obligee at the time of the delivery to him had no notice of the agreement stated in defendant’s pleas.

The case presents identically the same questions decided . by this court in the case of Hash v. Fugate, recently decided by this court. It was there held that a surety, who executes and delivers to his principal, a bond complete and perfect on its face, is estopped to claim that it is a mere escrow, as against the obligee who receives the instrument *iona fide,*for a valuable consideration in ignorance of the agreement which renders it a mere escrow.

It is therefore only necessary to refer to the opinion delivered in that case as embracing all that is necessary to be said ' in this ; and as conclusive of the decree to be made here.

This now renders it unnecessary to express any opinion in regard to the competency of Peter S. Eoller as a witness. For if it be conceded that he is competent, the facts stated by him constitute no defence against the claim *46of the plaintiff. If on the other hand he is considered incompetent, there is an entire absence of his testimony to show the alleged agreement upon which the defence is founded.

The judgment of the circuit court must therefore be reversed, and judgment given here for the plaintiff.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 689 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 689

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Rules and 
                                Manual.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

Mrs. Feinstein submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Rules and 
                                Manual.

    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Committee on Rules and Administration shall prepare 
        a revised edition of the Senate Rules and Manual for the use of 
        the 110th Congress;
            (2) the manual shall be printed as a Senate document; and
            (3) in addition to the usual number of documents, 1,500 
        additional copies of the manual shall be bound, of which--
                    (A) 500 paperbound copies shall be for the use of 
                the Senate; and
                    (B) 1,000 copies shall be bound (550 paperbound; 
                250 nontabbed black skiver; 200 tabbed black skiver) 
                and delivered as may be directed by the Committee on 
                Rules and Administration.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,772
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,751
<OTHER-SE>                                     (63,642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,772
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,512)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.005)




</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.611 Neponset River. The Granite Avenue Bridge, mile 2.5, between Boston and Milton, Massachusetts, shall operate as follows: ( a ) The draw of the Granite Avenue Bridge shall open on signal from May 1 through October 31; 6 a.m. to 12 midnight. At all other times the draw shall open on signal if at least one hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( b ) The owners of this bridge shall provide and keep in good legible condition, clearance gauges for each draw with figures not less than twelve (12) inches high designed, installed and maintained according to the provisions of § 118.160 of this chapter.
[CGD01-94-087, 60 FR 54432, Oct. 24, 1995]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Family Status of Breadwinning Women: A Study of Material in the Census Schedules of a Selected Locality

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*The Family Status of Breadwinning Women: A Study of Material in the Census Schedules of a Selected Locality : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 23*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1922,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5347,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2136]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on February 2, 2011 
at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    The Commission will consider whether to propose rules and a form to 
implement Section 763 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act relating to the registration and regulation of security-
based swap execution facilities.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 26, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2136 Filed 1-27-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P