alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12
 
  CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
    
    Cash dividends paid/Common shares outstanding at
date of declarationBOOK VALUE PER SHARE
    
    Total stockholders equity/Common shares outstanding
at year-endRETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Net income/Average assetsRETURN ON AVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
    
    Net income/Average stockholders equityTANGIBLE RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    (Net income)/(Average assets)TANGIBLE RETURN ON AVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
    
    (Net income)/(Average Equity)EARNINGS PER SHARE
    
    (Net
income)/(Weighted-average common shares outstanding)NET INTEREST MARGIN
    
    Net interest income/Average earning assetsNON-INTEREST EXPENSE TO AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Non-interest expense/Average assetsEFFICIENCY RATIO
    
    (Non-interest expenses less
non-recurring, non-operational items)/(Net interest income plus non-interest income)AVERAGE LOANS TO AVERAGE DEPOSITS
    
    Average gross loans/Average depositsDIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO
    
    Dividends declared/Net incomeAVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY TO AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Average stockholders equity/Average assetsPRIMARY CAPITAL TO PERIOD-END TOTAL ASSETS
    
    (Stockholders equity plus allowance for loan
losses)/(Period-end total assets plus allowance for
loan losses)TIER I CAPITAL TO PERIOD
    
    (Stockholders equity less accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss)(Tier 1 Capital)/Risk-
adjusted assetsTOTAL CAPITAL RATIO
    
    Tier 1 Capital plus allowance for loan losses/Risk-
adjusted assetsTIER I LEVERAGE RATIO
    
    Tier 1 Capital/Quarterly average assetsNET CHARGE-OFFS TO AVERAGE LOANS
    
    (Gross charge-offs less recoveries)/Average net loansNON-PERFORMING LOANS AS A PERCENTAGE OF
PERIOD END
    
    (Nonaccrual loans plus loans past
due 90 days or greater plus renegotiated loans)/Gross loans net of
unearned interestNON-PERFORMING ASSETS AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL ASSETS
    
    (Nonaccrual loans plus loans past
due 90 days or greater plus renegotiated loans plus other real estate owned)/Total assetsALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES TO PERIOD-END TOTAL
LOANS
    
    Allowance for loan losses/Gross loans net of
unearned interest
**Exhibit 32.2****CELEBRATE EXPRESS, INC.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Celebrate Express,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Darin L. White, Vice President,Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Darin L. White       Darin L. White     Vice President, FinanceAugust 22, 2005
```

[House Report 111-2]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress}                                                 {Report
  1st Session }          HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES               {111-2
                                                       
======================================================================
 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 384) TO REFORM THE 
  TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF PROGRAM OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY AND 
                ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY UNDER SUCH PROGRAM

                                _______
                                

  January 13, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 53]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 53, by voice vote, report the same to the 
House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 384, the 
TARP Reform and Accountability Act of 2009. The resolution 
provides for two hours of general debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Financial Services. The resolution waives all 
points of order against consideration of the bill except those 
arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. The resolution provides 
that the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion after 
general debate and that no further consideration of the bill 
shall occur except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the bill (except for those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI), 
includes a waiver of clause 10 of rule XXI regarding PAYGO.

                                  

```
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.901 Chester Creek.

The draw of the Front Street bridge, mile 0.1 at Chester, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
§ 156.111 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Vessel Activities (CG-CVC), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593, telephone 202-372-1251, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) International Chamber of Shipping, 12 Carthusian Street, London EC1M 6EB, England, telephone + 44 20 7417 8844, *http://www.marisec.org/ .* ( 1 ) Guide to Helicopter/Ship Operations, Fourth Edition, 2008, incorporation by reference approved for § 156.330(c).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) International Maritime Organization (IMO), 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, telephone + 44(0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org/ .* ( 1 ) Manual on Oil Pollution, Section I: Prevention, Second Edition, 2011, incorporation by reference approved for § 156.410(c) and (f).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF), 15th Floor, 96 Victoria Street, London SW1E 5JW, England, telephone + 44(0)20 7654 1200, *http://www.ocimf.com/ .* ( 1 ) Ship to Ship Transfer Guide, (Petroleum), Fourth Edition, 2005, incorporation by reference approved for § 156.330(b), § 156.410(c) and 156.410(f).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2010-0194, 80 FR 5935, Feb. 4, 2015]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ALFRED PANZER I, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16942 

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-01655-MEJ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted July 11, 2017***

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

John Alfred Panzer I appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing 

his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** Panzer consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-16942 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to 

comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 

1177 (9th Cir. 1996), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Panzer’s action

for failure to comply with Rule 8 because the second amended complaint does not 

contain “a short and plain statement of the claims showing that [Panzer] is entitled 

to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. 8(a)(2), (d)(1); McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1174 (affirming 

dismissal under Rule 8, and recognizing that “[p]rolix, confusing complaints . . .

impose unfair burdens on litigants and judges”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Panzer’s second

amended complaint without leave to amend because Panzer was provided with two 

opportunities to amend and further amendment would be futile. See Cervantes v. 

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth 

standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper 

when amendment would be futile); Chodos v. West Publ’g Co., Inc., 292 F.3d 992, 

1003 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[W]hen a district court has already granted a plaintiff leave 

to amend, its discretion in deciding subsequent motions to amend is particularly 

broad.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Panzer’s motion for transcripts, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128506 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128506 COA: 251457 Washtenaw CC: 02-001075-FC LLOYD OWEN GRESEHOVER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities 9/1/2011 

FY 2011 Final Allocation 

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII 

Alabama $262,233 $77,924 $340,157 

Alaska $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Arizona $348,130 $103,449 $451,579 

Arkansas $165,619 $49,214 $214,833 

California $1,693,475 $503,223 $2,196,698 

Colorado $227,267 $67,534 $294,801 

Connecticut $196,524 $59,907 $256,431 

Delaware $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

District of Columbia $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Florida $1,226,365 $364,420 $1,590,785 

Georgia $429,742 $127,700 $557,442 

Hawaii $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Idaho $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Illinois $643,452 $197,384 $840,836 

Indiana $334,905 $99,519 $434,424 

Iowa $174,013 $55,927 $229,940 

Kansas $147,001 $45,843 $192,844 

Kentucky $233,207 $69,299 $302,506 

Louisiana $226,146 $68,518 $294,664 

Maine $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Maryland $287,437 $85,413 $372,850 

Massachusetts $361,717 $109,606 $471,323 

Michigan $544,348 $161,756 $706,104 

Minnesota $270,333 $80,331 $350,664 

Mississippi $151,899 $45,198 $197,097 

Missouri $329,777 $97,995 $427,772 

Montana $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Nebraska $95,242 $29,770 $125,012 

Nevada $128,779 $38,267 $167,046 

New Hampshire $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

New Jersey $471,073 $143,950 $615,023 

New Mexico $104,556 $31,069 $135,625 

New York $1,057,995 $318,066 $1,376,061 

North Carolina $490,016 $145,611 $635,627 

North Dakota $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Ohio $644,354 $197,185 $841,539 

Oklahoma $198,924 $60,208 $259,132 

Oregon $213,891 $63,559 $277,450 

Pennsylvania $764,412 $242,944 $1,007,356 

Rhode Island $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

South Carolina $256,121 $76,108 $332,229 

South Dakota $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Tennessee $344,228 $102,289 $446,517 

Texas $1,048,816 $311,661 $1,360,477 

Utah $101,944 $30,293 $132,237 

Vermont $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

Virginia $397,235 $118,040 $515,275 

Washington $337,546 $100,303 $437,849 

West Virginia $115,956 $36,736 $152,692 

Wisconsin $305,652 $90,826 $396,478 

Wyoming $83,746 $25,163 $108,909 

American Samoa $10,468 $3,145 $13,613 

Guam $41,873 $12,582 $54,455 

Northern Mariana Islands $10,468 $3,145 $13,613 

Puerto Rico $225,524 $67,016 $292,540 

Virgin Islands $41,873 $12,582 $54,455 

TOTAL $16,749,234 $5,032,634 $21,781,868
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.200 What is the purpose of this subpart? This subpart prescribes the requirements for processing an application for a deepwater port license. It includes the procedures for: ( a ) Maintaining the docket;
( b ) Designating Adjacent Coastal States;
( c ) Holding informal and formal public hearings; and
( d ) Approving or denying an application.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013]
§ 147.1102 Platform GRACE safety zone. ( a ) *Description:* The area within a line 500 meters from each point on the structure's outer edge. The position of the center of the structure is 34°-10′-47′′ N, 119°-28′-05′′ W.
( b ) *Regulations:* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel,
( 2 ) a vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing, or
( 3 ) a vessel authorized by the Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[CCGD 11-79-02, 47 FR 39679, Sept. 9, 1982; 48 FR 33263, July 21, 1983]
Integrated Solutions for Accessible 

Train Car Elements

for VIA Rail Canada‘s Renaissance Coach Cars

Uwe Rutenberg

ICAT

RVAAC, January 9/10, 2014

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 1
Background

Accessibility Regulations for Intercity Rail Travel in 

Canada:

• Voluntary Code of Practice Guidelines, not ADA 

• Can be enforced by the Canadian Transportation 

Agency (on federal regulated transportation 

modes, air, intercity trains, some Intercity Buses) 

after complaints by disabled persons

• One coach car per train consist must be fully 

accessible 

• One wheelchair position in accessible car

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 2
Integrated Elements

To make all elements onboard a train car accessible:

• Boarding

• Entrance door

• Vestibule

• Path to wheelchair position

• Wheelchair position space with adjustable table

• Adjacent companion seat

• Space for service animals

• Access to washroom

• Accessible Washroom

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 3
Original Design Concept

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 4
Entrance door – 32” wide

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 5
Boarding

Bridge plate for leveled platforms, 

only two stations in Canada 

Station-based lift for non-leveled 

platforms, majority of stations

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 6
Car borne Lifts

• Cassette lift by Ricon

presently for sleeper 

cars only

• Currently investigating 

the use of car-borne 

lifts for all coach cars

• Car borne lifts require 

vertical travel of 48”

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 7
Vestibule

• Vestibule clear circle of 

1500 mm – 59 inches

• For full turn of 

wheelchair plus 

assistant

• For 3 and 4- wheel 

scooters up to 1220 mm 

– 48 inches long

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 8
Accessible Paths

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 9
Vestibule door

Vestibule door to cabin

Doors without threshold

Touch control to open

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 10
Path to wheelchair position

Top view

Vestibule door width: 32 inches;

Path width: 35.4 inches 

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 11
Wheelchair Position

Wheelchair footprint: 29.5” x 47.25”

Adjustable table for meals and work

Maneuvering circle: 59”

Space for service animal

Companion/transfer seats opposite 

with pivoting armrests

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 12
Transfer seats with pivoting aisle 

armrest

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 13
Washroom

1. Sliding power door 39” wide

2. Wheelchair positions for dependent and

independent transfers 35” x 59”

3. Pivoting support arms on sides of toilet for 

Elderly to facilitate getting on and off toilet

4. Paper dispenser and emergency call button 

within reach from toilet

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 14
Washroom Vanity

Knee space under sink

Grab bar around sink

Automatic faucet and soap dispenser

Pivoting mirror

Warm water temperature control

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 15
Touch activated power sliding door for 

washroom (inside)

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 16
Thank You

Discussions

Uwe Rutenberg, RVAAC 2014 17
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.115 Three Mile Creek. ( a ) The draw of the US43 bridge, mile 1.0 at Mobile, need not be opened from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. daily. At all other times, the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Norfolk Southern railroad bridge, mile 1.1 at Mobile, shall open on signal if at least five days notice is given.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Harvey R. Blau, Chairman of the Board  of Aeroflex Incorporated, certify
that:

         The Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended September
         30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Aeroflex Incorporated for the periods presented.

This certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Aeroflex Incorporated
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




                                 /s/ Harvey R. Blau
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Harvey R. Blau
                                 Chairman of the Board
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

                                 Date: November 14, 2002
#### State of Nebraska, ex rel. William M. Clark & Company, v. School District No. 24, Chase County, Nebraska, et al.

Filed November 8, 1893.

No. 5481.

Mand.km.us : Forum or Jurisdiction. This proceeding being simply one for the collection of a debt, of which the district court of Chase county has ample jurisdiction, a writ of *mandamus*is denied, and the action dismissed. *State, ex rel. Berpolsheimer, v. Lincoln Gas Co.,*38 Neb., 33, followed.

Original application for *mandamus.*

*Samuel J. Tuttle,*for relator.

Ryan, C.

This is an original application for a *mandamus*brought against school district No. 24 of Chase county, Nebraska, and its treasurer, H. H. Waggener. The petition alleges the "existence of an indebtedness on various accounts on the part of said school district, and that the several evidences 'of indebtedness have been duly assigned to the relator, and that the school district refuses to pay the same. The *238prayer is that a writ of *mandamus*issue commanding the treasurer to pay the said orders, aud that if it be shown by the answer and return of said treasurer and by proof that there are no funds in his hands for the payment of the same, said school district be compelled by *mandamus*to-levy and collect a sufficient amount of taxes to pay said orders.

This petition was filed June 30,1892; and it is probable that the present status of affairs in that school district would require in this petition an amendment for the purpose 'of submitting the case properly. There has been no brief served or filed, so far as the record shows, and no answer made. In view of these facts, and the further fact that this *mandamus*proceeding is brought simply for the collection of a debt due from the school district to private individuals, we are compelled to follow the rule laid down-in *State, ex rel. Herpolsheimer, v. Lincoln Gas Co.,*38 Neb., 33. The application is therefore dismissed without prejudice.

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Arthur S. Przybyl, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Akorn, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:A) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;B) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; andC) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):A) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andB) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting./s/ ARTHUR S. PRZYBYL
#### § 155.770 Draining into bilges.

No person may intentionally drain oil or hazardous material from any source into the bilge of a vessel.

[CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36255, Sept. 4, 1990]