alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
 FORM OF CERTIFICATE FOR SHARES OF     % 
 REDEEMABLE
SERIES J PREFERRED STOCK 








			
	Number     	  	             Shares
		  	CUSIP 620107    201

 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 

MOTRICITY, INC. 
 a Corporation Formed Under the Laws of the State of Delaware 
  

					
	THIS CERTIFIES THAT	 		 	

 is the owner of
                             
 FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF     % REDEEMABLE SERIES J PREFERRED STOCK, LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE $         PER SHARE, $0.001 PAR VALUE
PER SHARE, OF 
 MOTRICITY, INC. 
 (the “Corporation”), transferable on the books of the Corporation by the registered holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the charter of the Corporation (the “Charter”) and the Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto. This
Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
 Dated:
                      
  

					
	  
	 		 	  

	            President	 		 	            Secretary

 Countersigned and Registered: 
 American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC 
 Transfer Agent and
Registrar 







  
 MOTRICITY, INC. 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription
on the face of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

									
	TEN COM	  	-as tenants in common	 		 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-	  	             Custodian
            
	TEN ENT	  	-as tenants by the entireties	 		 		  	(Cust)                    (Minor)
	JT TEN	  	-as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 		 		  	 under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act of             
             (State)

		  		 		 		  	
		  		 		 		  	

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For Value Received,              hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
  

 
  
 (Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address Including Zip Code, of Assignee) 
 Shares of the
    % Redeemable Series J Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Corporation represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                             attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated:
                     
  

			
	X	 	  

	X	 	  

		
		 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE face OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR
ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


  

					
	Signature(s) Guaranteed	 	
			
	By 	 	  
	 	
	            	 	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15
§ 183.335 Level flotation test without weights for persons capacity. When the conditions prescribed in § 183.320 (a) and (d) through (g) are met, the boat must float in fresh, calm water as follows: ( a ) The angle of heel does not exceed 10 degrees from the horizontal.
( b ) Any point on either the forward or aft reference area is above the surface of the water.
( c ) The reference depth at the reference area that is opposite the reference area that is above the surface of the water is 6 inches or less.
[CGD 75-168, 42 FR 20245, Apr. 18, 1977, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999]
Exhibit 32(g)




                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern
Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we, the undersigned,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual
knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the
     quarter ended September 30, 2005, which this statement accompanies, fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern
     Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Southern Power Company.



                               /s/Ronnie L. Bates
                                 Ronnie L. Bates
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                             /s/Michael W. Southern
                               Michael W. Southern
                            Senior Vice President and
                             Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 3, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2560-000]

      ( print page 35915)    
Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Louisville Gas and Electric Company (LG&E)/Kentucky Utilities (KU) (hereinafter Companies), tendered for filing unexecuted unilateral Service Sales Agreement between Companies and Trans/Alta Energy Marketing (US) Inc., under the Companies' Rate Schedule MBSS.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14139 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.141 American River.

The draw of the Jiboom Street bridge, mile 0.1 at Sacramento, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.

[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984; 49 FR 37381, Sept. 24, 1984]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-61029-RUIZ/STRAUSS 

LATOYA RATLIEFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

DISCOVERY ORDER 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for a discovery hearing on July 18, 2023, upon 

Plaintiff’s Ore Tenus Motion to Compel better responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Interrogatories 

(“the Motion”). The District Court has referred all discovery matters to me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636. [DE 27]. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, it is ORDERED and 

ADJUDGED that:

1. The Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as set forth herein.

2. As to interrogatory 1, the Motion is granted to the extent that interrogatory 1 is 

amended as follows:

Identify specific video footage (of which you are aware) by time stamp, 

including BWC footage or undercover footage, supporting any contention of 

violence at the corner of SE 2nd Street and SE 1st Ave on May 31, 2020, during 

the following time periods: (a) From 6:51pm ET to 6:52 pm ET; (b) From 6:52 

pm ET to 6:59 pm ET; (c) From 7:00 pm ET to 7:01:25 pm ET; (d) From 

7:01pm ET to 7:07:30 pm ET.

Case 0:22-cv-61029-RAR Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

3. As to interrogatory 2, the Motion is granted to the extent that interrogatory 2 is 

amended as follows:

Identify all documents, videos, and evidence of any kind (of which you are 

aware), which supports your contention of civilian violence toward officers at 

the corner of SE 2nd Street and SE 1st Ave on May 31, 2020, during the 

following time periods: (a) From 6:51pm ET to 6:52 pm ET; (b) From 6:52 pm 

ET to 6:59 pm ET; (c) From 7:00 pm ET to 7:01:25 pm ET; (d) From 7:01pm 

ET to 7:07:30 pm ET.

4. Defendants must respond to interrogatories 1 and 2 by July 31, 2023. 

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 19th day of July 2023. 

Case 0:22-cv-61029-RAR Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2023 Page 2 of 2
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Guidance

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance GuidanceADR2022-02-19T08:34:56-05:00
			
			GuidanceWelcome to the Second Edition of the Electronic Guide to Federal Procurement Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
In 1999, the Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution Working Group‘s Contracts and Procurement Section published the first edition of this guide. Brigadier General Frank J. Anderson, USAF, then the Chair of the section, observed that ADR “is quickly and quietly gaining momentum as the conflict management tool of choice for resolving contractual disagreements.”  The momentum continued to build through the years. Today, as the 34 chapters of this revision show, ADR is firmly embedded as a normal part of protest and dispute resolution processes for federal procurement matters.  It is part of the acquisition policies at nearly every agency, and is incorporated into the rules or regulations governing the practice before protest and dispute forums.  Many agencies also have standing programs to encourage and facilitate using ADR at the lowest possible level of conflict.
This guide is designed to help the public and Government employees quickly access procurement ADR information.  It includes:
**Part I** gives readers definitions, legal authorities, and an understanding of why ADR has become so prevalent in American business.
**Part II**focuses on proactive techniques to adopt during acquisition planning stages in order to manage conflict and, hopefully, turn conflicts into opportunities to creatively address problems and increase opportunities for mutual gain.
**Part III** explores the use of ADR in the context of bid protests and other matters relating to the award of contracts.
**Part IV** relates to solving problems during contract administration either at the claim stage or when before a board or court.
**Part V** explores narrow ADR concepts in greater detail.  Most of these concepts apply to both protests and disputes.Printable materials and forms are grouped in the supplemental Library, and some of the most informative websites are collected in Useful Links.
**LEARN MORE**
Contributors to this Guide Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Case 1:22-cv-22713-JEM   Document 12   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-22713-JEM   Document 12   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Gerald F. Sullivan certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





1.           The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sibling Entertainment Group Holdings, Inc., (the “Company ”) for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report ”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 14, 2012







By: /s/ Gerald F. SullivanName: Gerald F. SullivanTitle: Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive

Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 110.231 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska, Large Passenger Vessel Anchorage. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds. Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska, Large Passenger Vessel Anchorage.* The waters of Ketchikan Harbor, Ketchikan, Alaska, enclosed by the following boundary lines: A line from Thomas Basin Entrance Light “2” to East Channel Lighted Buoy “4A”, to Pennock Island Reef Lighted Buoy “PR”, to Wreck Buoy “WR6”, then following a line bearing 064 degrees true to shore. This anchorage is effective 24 hours per day from 1 May through 30 September, annually.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) When transiting through the anchorage, all vessels using propulsion machinery shall proceed across the anchorage by the most direct route and without unnecessary delay. Sudden course changes within the anchorage are prohibited.
( 2 ) No vessels, other than a large passenger vessel of over 1600 gross tons, (including ferries), may anchor within the anchorage without the express consent of the Captain of the Port, Southeast Alaska.
[CGD17-99-002, 64 FR 29558, June 2, 1999]
#### § 166.300 Areas along the coast of California.

(a) *Purpose.* Fairways as described in this section are established to control the erection of structures therein to provide safe vessel routes along the coast of California.

(b) *Designated Areas* —

(1) *Port Hueneme Safety Fairway.* An area one nautical mile in width centered on the alinement of Port Hueneme Entrance Channel and extending seaward from the 30-foot-depth curve for a distance of 1.5 nautical miles, thence turning southerly and widening to 1.5 nautical miles at the 3-mile limit, all between lines joining the following points:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 34°06′30′′ N | 119°15′00′′ W |
| 34°07′37′′ N | 119°14′25′′ W |
| 34°08′49′′ N | 119°13′21′′ W |

thence generally along the 30-foot-depth curve to the seaward end of the west entrance jetty; seaward end of the east entrance jetty, thence generally along the 30-foot-depth curve to:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 34°08′21′′ N | 119°12′15′′ W |
| 34°07′10′′ N | 119°13′20′′ W |
| 34°05′48′′ N | 119°13′23′′ W |

(2) [Reserved]

[CGD 82-101, 48 FR 49019, Oct. 24, 1983]
### EAARL coastal topography — Sandy Hook 2007

By: Amar NayegandhiJohn Brock**C. Wayne WrightSara StevensXan YatesJamie M. Bonisteel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds393

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 7, 2000.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: May 31, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13935 Filed 5-31-00; 10:03 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

p0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

145015

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145015

COA: 302563

Wayne CC: 10-002260-FC

TRAMMANUEL DURHAM,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4729

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan,

design, construct, and equip laboratory, administrative, and support space

to house base operations for the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

Submillimeter Array located on Mauna Kea at Hilo, Hawaii.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 2000

Mr. MATSUI (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastucture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committed concerned

A BILL

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, construct, and equip laboratory,

administrative, and support space to house base operations for the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

Submillimeter Array located on Mauna Kea at Hilo, Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4729 IH

1 SECTION 1. FACILITY AUTHORIZED.

2 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution

3 is authorized to plan, design, construct, and equip labora4 tory, administrative, and support space to house base op5 erations for the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

6 Submillimeter Array located on Mauna Kea at Hilo, Ha7 waii.

8 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro10 priated to the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti11 tution to carry out this Act $2,000,000 for fiscal year

12 2001 and $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2002.

13 (b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Any funds authorized

14 to be appropriated to carry out this Act shall remain avail15 able until expended.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130620-1 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JOSEFINA RODRIGUEZ, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130620 

 COA: 262443 

Van Buren CC: 01-048134-CK 

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

SAFECO INSURANCE, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

SAFECO INSURANCE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130621 

 COA: 262444 

Van Buren CC: 01-048128-CK 

JOSEFINA RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Third-Party-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
#### WYNDHAM THOMAS, Appellant, *v.*ALVIN HIGGINS, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered on a referee’s report, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.

The action was brought to recover for work, labor and materials, furnished under an oral contract to defendant, and the chief defense was that the work was not done in a workmanlike manner, and that the plaintiff had not performed his contract. The court at General Term, without any discussion of the reasons therefor, was of opinion that certain evidence as to the value of the work' and the direction of the defendant as to the same, offered by the plaintiff, had been improperly excluded by the referee, and reversed the judgment.

*A. P. Hinman,*for the appellant.

*S. F. & F. H.*Cowdrey, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Tappen, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted at Circuit, costs to abide event.