alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Sanitary Drinking Facilities: With Special Reference to Drinking Fountains

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Correll, Marie, 1902-. 						*Sanitary Drinking Facilities: With Special Reference to Drinking Fountains : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 87*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5395,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Eastgate Acquisitions            Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December            31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the            "Report"), I,**Geoff Williams**, Chief            Executive Officer Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18            U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of            the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEOFFWILLIAMS** |
|-----|-------------------|

 

**Geoff Williams**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

April 7, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or            other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that            appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been            provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing            certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section            906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter            63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB            or as a separate disclosure document.
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.400 What does this subpart do?

This subpart prescribes rules that apply to the transfer of oil or natural gas at a deepwater port.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 7 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 

2 o’clock meridian unless otherwise ordered. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 147.1112 Platform HIDALGO safety zone. ( a ) *Description:* The area within a line 500 meters from each point on the structure's outer edge. The position of the center of the structure is 34-29-42 N, 120-42-08 W.
( b ) *Regulations:* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel,
( 2 ) a vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing or
( 3 ) a vessel authorized by the Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[CGD 11-84-01, 49 FR 33016, Aug. 20, 1984]
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000402 22-MAY-2019 08:23 AM
EXHIBIT 21

|LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES*                    
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|                                         
|Subsidiary                               
|Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation        
|Krispy Kreme
      Mobile Store Company  
|Golden Gate Doughnuts, LLC               
|North Texas
      Doughnuts, L.P.        
|HD Capital Corporation                   
|HDN
      Development Corporation        
|Panhandle Doughnuts, LLC                 
|Krispy Kreme
      International Ltd.    
|Hot Doughnuts Now International Ltd.     
|Krispy Kreme
      Canada, Inc.          
|KK Canada Holdings, Inc.                 
|Krispy Kreme
      Brand Fund Corporation
|Krispy Kreme Management I, LLC           
|Krispy Kreme
      Management II, LLC    
|Krispy Kreme Management III, LLC         
|Krispy K
      Canada Company            
|Northeast Doughnuts, LLC                 
|Java Joes Public Market Roastery, Inc.   
|Southern Doughnuts, LLC                  
|Southwest Doughnuts, LLC                 

|* |  | This list excludes non-material subsidiaries that are in the process of being dissolved.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-51250

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GILBERT MAURICIO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-1495-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilbert Mauricio

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mauricio has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 6, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-51250 Document: 00514062388 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2017
No. 16-51250

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-51250 Document: 00514062388 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2017
Exhibit 10.6
 ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
2008 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
 Section 1. Establishment; Purpose
 Establishment
 Purpose
 Section 2. Administration
 Composition of the Committee
 Power and Authority of the Committee
 Qualified Performance-Based Compensation




---



##### 



(A)
    
    designate all Participants for such fiscal
year; and(B)
    
    establish the objective performance factors for
each Participant for that fiscal year on the basis of one or more of
the business criteria set forth herein.
   Section 3. Eligibility and Participation
 Eligibility
 2




---



##### 



Participation
 Employment
 Section 4. Payment of Annual Cash Bonus Awards
 General
 Payment of Annual Cash Bonus Awards
 Discretionary Reduction
 Section 5. Termination of Employment
 Termination of Employment.
 Death
 3




---



##### 



Section 6. Nontransferability
  Section 7. Taxes
  Section 8. Amendment and Termination
 Term of Plan
 Amendments to and Termination of Plan provided however
 Correction of Defects, Omissions and Inconsistencies
 Section 9. Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 Severability
 4




---



##### 



No Trust or Fund Created
 Nature of Payments
 5
[666 NE2d 552, 643 NYS2d 959]

#### In the Matter of United Environmental Techniques, Inc., Respondent, v State of New York Department of Health, Appellant.

Argued March 19, 1996;

decided April 25, 1996

*825APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General,*New York City *(Barbara K. Hathaway*and *Victoria Graffeo*of counsel), for appellant.

*Andrew M. Friedman,*Richmond Hill, and *Marvin Friedman*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

United Environmental Techniques, Inc. sued to compel the State Department of Health to grant it a hearing with respect to the Department’s revocation of the provisional approval for United to operate an asbestos training facility (10 NYCRR 73.8 [a]). Supreme Court granted the petition and the Appellate Division affirmed. This Court granted leave to appeal, and we now reverse. Because United Environmental Techniques, Inc. is a foreign corporation which has failed to file an amended certificate to do business in New York, as required by Business Corporation Law § 1309, it lacked capacity to sue in New York (Business Corporation Law § 1312 [a]) and the courts below should not have ruled on the merits of this matter.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.420 What actions must be taken when cargo transfer equipment is defective? When any piece of equipment involved in oil or natural gas transfer equipment is defective: ( a ) The piece of equipment must be replaced or repaired before making any further cargo transfers; and
( b ) The repaired or replaced piece must meet or exceed its original specifications. Repairs must be conducted in accordance with the port's maintenance program outlined in the operations manual, and that program must provide for the repair of natural gas transfer hoses in accordance with § 127.405 of this chapter.
[Crim. No. 1969.

First Appellate District, Division One.

July 10, 1937.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of SWAMI CLAUDETTE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

*689Raine Ewell for Petitioner.

Raymond D. Williamson for Respondent.

TYLER, P. J.

—Petitioner was arrested on April 17, 1937, in San Francisco on a warrant issued upon a complaint charging petty theft. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days and to pay a fine of $250.  At the time of the rendition of the judgment and sentence imposing the fine no alternative of a further imprisonment for nonpayment of the fine was made and no imprisonment of petitioner was ordered by the court for nonpayment of said fine. The time of the imprisonment expired on May 14, 1937, at which time the court made and signed an additional order that petitioner be imprisoned for another thirty days or until the fine was paid, not exceeding $8.33 a day, said sum amounting to the $250 fine originally imposed. The court was without jurisdiction to make such *nunc pro tunc*order or any further or additional imprisonment of petitioner, it having exhausted its jurisdiction under the original judgment.

The writ is granted and the petitioner discharged.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.
Exhibit 32.1

                         Statement Furnished Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned are the President and Chief Financial Officer of
Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate
is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for
the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "10-KSB Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.


Date: October 13, 2005                          /s/ GORDON W. DAVIES
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Gordon W. Davies
                                                President


Date: October 13, 2005                          /s/ MICHAEL C. DAVIES
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael C. Davies
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and will be retained
by Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       37
#### § 156.105 Definitions.

Except as specifically stated in a section, the definitions in § 154.105 of this chapter apply to this subpart.

[CGD 90-071a, 59 FR 53291, Oct. 21, 1994]
|                                             |   | Series                2003-1 |          | Series                2004-1 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|---------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |   |                         |          |                         |   |
| General                Sub-Account               |   | $                            | 26,299,397.25 |                         | $      | 14,549,157.47 |   |
| Capital                Sub-Account               |   | $                            | 2,540,765.87  |                         | $      | 3,964,871.93 |   |
| Overcollateralization                Sub-Account |   | $                            | 635,016.06    |                         | $      | 825,643.65 |   |
| Reserve                Sub-Account               |   | $                            | 798,491.12    |                         | $      | 3,534,053.93 |   |
|                                             |   |                         |          |                         |   |   |   |

| * | REP                deposits are held in one account with a sub-ledger outlining the                respective amount of each REP’s deposit attributable to each series of                bonds. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2021 Final Allocation

9/3/2021

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII

Alabama $283,611 $76,215 $359,826

Alaska $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Arizona $424,776 $87,111 $511,887

Arkansas $172,381 $48,157 $220,538

California $1,965,342 $471,073 $2,436,415

Colorado $288,276 $59,101 $347,377

Connecticut $212,065 $59,907 $271,972

Delaware $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

District of Columbia $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Florida $1,430,225 $344,252 $1,774,477

Georgia $516,541 $105,899 $622,440

Hawaii $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Idaho $96,739 $23,758 $120,497

Illinois $689,401 $197,384 $886,785

Indiana $366,180 $98,224 $464,404

Iowa $183,511 $55,927 $239,438

Kansas $159,427 $45,843 $205,270

Kentucky $252,292 $66,595 $318,887

Louisiana $251,201 $68,518 $319,719

Maine $94,661 $23,758 $118,419

Maryland $325,999 $78,087 $404,086

Massachusetts $392,673 $109,606 $502,279

Michigan $594,928 $160,862 $755,790

Minnesota $311,375 $76,347 $387,722

Mississippi $163,526 $45,198 $208,724

Missouri $355,081 $97,643 $452,724

Montana $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Nebraska $104,409 $29,770 $134,179

Nevada $165,033 $33,834 $198,867

New Hampshire $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

New Jersey $498,016 $143,950 $641,966

New Mexico $121,953 $26,393 $148,346

New York $1,100,473 $318,066 $1,418,539

North Carolina $583,581 $126,782 $710,363

North Dakota $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Ohio $688,399 $197,185 $885,584

Oklahoma $212,100 $60,208 $272,308

Oregon $251,436 $56,795 $308,231

Pennsylvania $796,346 $242,944 $1,039,290

Rhode Island $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

South Carolina $309,039 $63,357 $372,396

South Dakota $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Tennessee $382,075 $91,810 $473,885

Texas $1,280,437 $274,281 $1,554,718

Utah $123,850 $25,391 $149,241

Vermont $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

Virginia $457,423 $102,820 $560,243

Washington $407,043 $86,291 $493,334

West Virginia $120,282 $36,736 $157,018

Wisconsin $343,384 $90,309 $433,693

Wyoming $94,225 $23,758 $117,983

American Samoa $11,778 $2,970 $14,748

Guam $47,112 $11,879 $58,991

Northern Mariana Islands $11,778 $2,970 $14,748

Puerto Rico $215,226 $54,217 $269,443

Virgin Islands $47,112 $11,879 $58,991

TOTAL $18,844,971 $4,751,640 $23,596,611
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
The Board of Directors and StockholdersMorton Industrial Group, Inc.:
We consent to incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-68927 and 333-69575) onForm S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our reportdated March 19, 2004, except as to note 20 which is as ofMarch 29, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheetsof Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2002 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit),and cash flows and the consolidated financial statement schedulefor each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2003, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K ofMorton Industrial Group, Inc. Our report refers to a change inaccounting for goodwill amortization and impairment in 2002.
/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLPIndianapolis, IndianaMarch 29, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.122 Piping, valves, and fittings. ( a ) Except as allowed in paragraph (o) of this section, the piping, valves, and fittings of each COW system must: ( 1 ) Meet 46 CFR Part 56; and
( 2 ) Be of steel or an equivalent material accepted by the Commandant.
( b ) The piping of each COW system must be permanently installed.
( c ) The piping of each COW system must be separate from other piping systems on the vessel, except that the vessel's cargo piping may be a part of the COW piping if the cargo piping meets this section.
( d ) The piping of each COW system must have overpressure relief valves or other means accepted by the Commandant to prevent overpressure in the piping of the COW system, unless the maximum allowable working pressure of that system is greater than the shut-off head of each pump that meets § 157.126(b).
( e ) Each overpressure relief valve must discharge into the suction side of a pump that meets § 157.126(b).
( f ) The piping and equipment of a COW system may not be in machinery spaces.
( g ) Each hydrant valve for water washing in the piping of a COW system must: ( 1 ) Have adequate strength to meet 46 CFR Part 56 for the working pressure for which the system is designed; and
( 2 ) Be capable of being blanked off.
( h ) Each sensing instrument must have an isolating valve at its connection to the piping of the COW system, unless the opening to that connection is 0.055 inches (1.4 millimeters) or smaller.
( i ) If the washing system for cargo tanks has a steam heater used when water washing, it must be located outside the engine room and must be capable of being isolated from the piping of the COW system by: ( 1 ) At least two shut-off valves in the inlet piping and at least two shut-off valves in the outlet piping; or
( 2 ) Blank flanges identifiable as being closed (e.g., spectacle flanges).
( j ) If the COW system has a common piping system for oil washing and water washing, that piping system must be designed to drain the crude oil into a slop tank or a cargo tank.
( k ) The piping of a COW system must be securely attached to the tank vessel's structure with pipe anchors.
( l ) When COW machines are used as pipe anchors, there must be other means available for anchoring the piping if these machines are removed.
( m ) There must be a means to allow movement of the COW system piping as a result of thermal expansion and flexing of the tank vessel.
( n ) The supply piping attached to each deck mounted COW machine and each COW machine that is audio inspected under § 157.155(a)(4)(ii) must have a shut-off valve.
( o ) On combination carriers, piping of the COW system installed between each COW machine located in a cargo tank hatch cover and an adjacent location just outside the hatch coaming, may be flexible hose with flanged connections that is acceptable by the Commandant.