# Western Regional Air Partnership

2009-10 Work Plan

August 7, 2009

1

## EXECUTIVE S U M M ARY

The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) is w o rking on behalf of its members to facilitate and assist with

the com p letio n of the regional haze i m pl em entation plans across the West during 2009- 10. The Technical

Sy stem s’ Operations and Related Pr ojects groupin g delivers regionally co m p arable, co m p lete, consistent, and

transparent data and analysis results for regional h aze planning and im ple menta tion. The Haze SIP Co m p letion

Support proje c t groupi ng d e livers specific results to assist states and EPA with com p letion of t h e foundati on al

regional haze im plementati on plans and continues tracki ng of em i s sions reductions and website support.

Deliverables

This 2009-10 workplan addresses the fo llowi ng projects, so m e con tinuing from the WRAP 2008-09 W o rkp l an :

Technical Syste ms’ Operations and Related Projects

• Em issions Data Management S y stem (E DMS) Operat ions

• Phase III O & G Inventory Reporting b y Basin

• Operations of Technical Support S y stem (TSS) & Visi bilit y Inf o rm ation Exchange Web Sy ste m (VIEWS)

• Fire E m issio n s Tracking Sy stem (FETS ) Operations

Haze SIP Co m p l e tion Support

• Tech Sy stem Support to I W G

• Modeling Re sults and TSS Supp ort

• Four Factor Analy s is

• PRP 2018 b I nventor y

• Modeling S u pport for § 30 8 and § 309 S I Ps

• §309 Milestone Reports

• Web Site Maintenance

These deliver ables and progress on these projects are described in Section III of this workplan.



### 2

### I. INTRODUCTION

The effort on the continui n g regional technical projects lis ted in this 200 9-10 wor k plan were reviewed by t h e

WRAP’s Oversight Comm i ttees, Foru m s , and Workgr oups in earl y 2009, as part of a larger work planni ng

process for 2010 and 2011. This workplan also contains d escriptions of the status of the proje c ts continuing

from the 2008-09 WRAP workplan . The projects in this 200 9-10 workplan are continui ng te chnical suppo rt

efforts or com p l e te key work to assist the states a nd EPA with the foundati onal regional haze im plementati on

plans. The 2009-10 workplan is in tended to identif y the activities to be conducted under grant m onies to be

awarded as n o ted in Appe ndix A.

This workpla n summarizes ongoing activities and expend itures of the WRAP, including curre nt projects and

those planned for the remai nder of 2009 and all of 20 10. The total a m ount of EPA’s FFY09 f unding for t h e WRAP’s regional haze work is currently $152,484. This docum ent will be submitted to EPA in support of

WGA’s grant application. There are FF Y09 supplementa ry funds t o be provided by WRAP region m e m b er

states in Fall 2009, through an EPA grant. This wor kpl an will ne ed to be am en ded when the total of those

supplementary funds is known and EPA provi des a “please apply ” l e tter for those funds.

The $152,484 in this FFY09 grant awar d, when com b i n ed with existing FFY 08 resources, will provide WRAP a

strictly lim ited abilit y t o pr ovide regional techni cal support for the r e view , approval, and ongoing

i m ple m entati on of haze plans on behalf of WRAP m e m b ers.

For this work plan, WGA staff developed the bu dget f o r the WRAP organization to pro v ide fu nding for staff,

travel support

, and pro j ect management throug h Decem b er 2010. With no E P A fundi ng curr ently available to

NTEC for the WRAP project, there will be no support for th e Tribal Caucus and tribal participation by NTEC.

As an interi m measure, the WGA ai r quality program and project manag ers will expand outreach to tribes

throug h Committee, Forum and proj ect E-Mails and conference c a lls.

In developi ng this work pla n , the WRAP Committees, Fo rum s , and Workgroups r ecognized that the grant funds

covered by this work plan will be the funds WGA re ceives to assist in the transition from co mpleting the

developm ent of the indi vidual regional haze plans, th rough their review and approval by EPA , and for t h e

parallel i m ple mentation of regional haze plan comm it ments . The individual regional haze i m ple m entation plans

rely u p o n the WRAP’s regional technical work, and t h e data and decision suppor t sy stem s underpinning the

long-term effort to track pr ogress and analy s is additional measures to reduce regional haze.



### 3Table 1 – WRAP 2009-10Budget and FinancialStatus Report (Expenditures are through May2009)Project TitleContract AmountExpendituresFFY09Grantfor2010ExpensesTechnical SystemsEDMSHosting/ Operation(ARS)408,518276,8040PhaseIIIO&GInventoryReportingbyBasin(ENVIRON)45,65033,3750TSSOperationsplus Fire Tracking(CIRA)*373,451312,010VIEWS2009operations - $30k/RPO (CIRA)**150,000125,000FETS Hosting /Operation(AirSciences)***75,000N/A0HazeSIPCompletionTechSystemSupporttoIWG/ DocumentPRP 18b scenario-(ARS)60,00037,3410Modeling Results and TSS Support (ENVIRON)34,9990FourFactorAnalysis(ECR)54,86950,8390PRP 2018bInventory (ERG)65,00063,0230Modeling for §308and §309SIPs- PRP18b/18cmvmodelruns (UCR)232,630144,6200§309Milestone Reports(PerrinQuarles)54,82535,2110Web Site Maintenance(BradBissey)61,30039,2520Subtotal forProjects Underway1,616,242992,475125,000Available BudgetAdministrativeTravel Reimbursements38,8350Conference Calls and Meetings24,0260Direct Salaries and Benefits216,22019,172Overhead&Other Expenses119,7898,312Subtotal forAdministrative398,87027,484Total Remainingfor ProjectsandAdministrativeAvailable Budget1,022,637152,484* - FETS operations are currently included and fundingis in place as aCIRA subcontract tothe TSSproject through September 2009 (see 3rd footnote).TSS operations are funded through December2009.** -FFY08 grant fundingacross all 5 RPOs covers2009 VIEWS operations,no FFY09 inter-RPO funding is available.With theTSSbuilt on top of VIEWS,WRAPresources of $125,000 will be used tojointlysupport the CIRA staff that operate andmaintainthe interwoven VIEWS-TSS technical data systems.*** - FETSoperations contract for October 2009 through December2010 will be issued separate fromthe TSS.4

### II. Background

1. Charter and Bylaws

The WRAP Charter and By laws set forth the organizati ons goals, principles, and o p erating procedures and are

posted on t h e WRAP website at http://www.wrapair.o r g/about/i ndex.htm l

.

2. WRAP Organiz ation

The WRAP is co m posed of several Co mmittees, Fo rums, and Workgroups. All these groups include

participation from the WRAP m e m b ership (states, tribes, and federal agencies) a nd interested stakeholders

(industr y

, environm ental groups, local governments, ac adem ia, etc.). Committee and forum mem b ers are

expected to represent and co mm unicat e with their ag encies and constituents. Fo rum and committee members

are responsible for establishing m echani s m s that will ensure this communication occurs. These m e chanisms

may inv o lve working t h ro ugh trade gr o ups, state and tr ibal organi zations such as the Western States Air

Resource Co uncil (WEST AR Council), the National Tribal Enviro nmental Council (NTEC), and intra- and

inter-agency f o rum s

.

3. Project Management

Co mm ittees and forum s direct m u ch of the work of th e WRAP. The oversight committees monitor f o rum and

work grou p activities to ensure that work prod ucts are developed i n a timely m a nner and that stakeholder

participation rem a ins representative, balanced, and fair. Contractors hired with E P A grant fun d s are relied upon

to expand the resources of the WRAP. Co mm ittees and forum s direct the work of WRAP staff and contractors.

Staff support services to the WRAP co me fro m the National Tribal Environm ental Council (NTEC) and the

Western Governors’ Association (WGA).

WGA and NTEC staff provide overall p r oject m a nag e m e nt for the WRAP, including preparing and m a naging

grant applications, funds, requests for proposals (RFPs), contracts, travel rei m burse ments, m e etings, conference

calls, public and m e dia inquiries, press releases, web sit es, requests to participate in the WRAP, and report

publications. WGA and NTEC staff routinel y attends the meetings of the various committees and forum s

. WGA and N TEC jointly or separately perfor m tasks r e la ted to WRAP and serve as prim ary contact points b y

responding to media and public inq u iries.

Staff positions include the WRAP Co-D irectors (WG A and NTEC) who oversee other staff, share general

management responsibiliti es, work with st akeholders to ensure the WRAP ' s pr ocesses are fair and equitable

, and

serve as the p r im ary poi nts of contact fo r EPA, the media, and the general publi c . State and tribal caucus

coordinators are hired with WRAP fund s throug h WE STA R and NTEC, respecti v ely. WGA also e m ploy s a n air

qualit y pr ogr am manager and air qualit y project m a n a ger to support the oversight committees, forum s , an d work

groups.

Under a separ ate EPA grant, NTEC has historically as sist ed with tribal participation in t h e WRAP by arranging

and facilitating Tribal Caucus mee tings; providi ng coordination am ong tr ibal repr esentatives of various

co mm ittees and forum s ; perform ing legal, polic y and t echnical anal y ses on various WRAP issues; and securing

contractor assistance for additional p o lic y and technic a l analy s is. T h is includes p r ovidin g staff support t o th e

Tribal Caucus within the WRAP. With no EPA fundi ng currently available to NTEC for the WRAP project,

there will be no support for the Tribal Caucus and tribal participation by NTEC. As an interim measure, t h e

WGA air qualit y program and project managers will e xpand outreach to tribes through C o mmittee, Forum and

project E-Mails and conference call s

.

4. Contract Management



### 5WRAP staff at WGA will continue to w o rk with the f o ru m s to manage WRAP contract s. WGA, as the reci pient

of EPA grant s , is responsible for executing and adm i nist ering cont racts and ensuring t h at work prod ucts are

co m p leted. These responsi b ilities are met with input from foru ms and work groups. For u m s and work groups

may create balanced subgroups for pu rposes of contract management.

It is the responsibilit y of the forums and work groups and their respective oversight committees to develop t h e

scope of work for each contract. All contracts are to be developed in accordance with the work plans approved

by the WRAP and subm itted to EPA. Once the sco pe of wo rk ha s been properly devel oped, it is transm itted to

WGA who are responsible for developin g an RFP or s o le source justification. All RFPs are sent to k nown

contractors, posted on the WRAP We b site, and publ ished in the F e dera l Business Opportunit i es publication as

appropriate. Bidders are pr ovided 30 da y s t o respond

.



### III. 2009-10 PROJECT SUMMARIES

Technical System s Projec ts

The projects described assi st with regional haze pla nning and im plementation by pr oviding tec hnical data and

analy tical results in suppor t of im plementation pl an com p letion, review, approv al, and tracking.

Em issions Data Management S y stem (E DMS) Operat ions

The ongoing maintenance and operation of the Em issi ons Database Managem e nt Sy stem (ED M S) will continue

throug h 2 010 . The EDMS is currently acquiring upda te d data from state and tribal agencies, and several

functions hav e been im proved in respon se to previous ly identified deficiencies. The EDMS is a data suppor t

sy stem integral to com p leti on, review, approval, and ongoi ng im plem entation of regional haze plans. The

EDMS is use d to track em i ssions reduction obligations identified in the plans (including BART), asses s the

effectiveness of control str a tegies, house updates to ex isting in vent ories, address new inventor y needs for

pollutants of regional concern, and track trends.

The operation and m a inten a nce budget i n cludes the annual cost for a contracted database ad ministrator to

operate the EDMS, provide data analy s is products, us er assi stance, qualit y assure new data, update database

versions, resolve data overlaps between state and tribal data, and pre p are standard re ports. In a ddition, a hos t

site is e m ployed to provide the necess ary hardware, including servers, and to ens u re data secur ity and archiving.

With EPA developing a new im proved National Em issions Invent or y form at to be im plemented for 20 08 d a ta,

the EF will also consider what functions to retain in the EDMS.

Phase III O & G Inventory Reporting b y Basin

In Fall 2007, the Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States (IPAM S) initiated the concept of

funding a Pha se III regional oil and gas emission inventor y project for the Intermountain West, in conjunction

with the WRAP, to build on, im prove, and address inve ntory issues in the WRAP Phase I a nd Phase II projects.

The result from Phase III w ill include all criteria pollutant em issions for all point and area sources associat ed

with the expl oration, pr od uction, and g a thering oper a tions of oil a nd gas in t h e major basins throug hout th e sixstate (CO, MT, NM, ND, UT, and WY) stud y regio n for y ear 2006 as well as future projection y ears. IPAMS

and WRAP will coordinate the data collection and ana l y s is, review and discussion, and i nvent or y data file

preparation for each m a jor basin. WRAP has contract ed with the I P AMS technical support contractor to

provide revie w and discussion of the draft and final documents on each O & G B asin as they are prepared.

Operations of the Technical Supp ort S y s t em (TSS) an d Visibility I n form ation Exchange Web Sy stem (VIE WS)

The TSS is the decision support s y stem for regional haze planning and im plementation across the WRAP

region. It is f u ll y integrate d with the VI EWS data s upport s y stem and partiall y i n tegrated with the EDMS and

FETS data support s y stem s, and presents m onitoring, em issions, source apportionment, and air qualit y m odeling



### 6data and results from W R AP regional analy s is project s like the RMC. The VIEWS/TSS sy st em s are maintained

and operated by staff from the Cooperative Institute for R esearch in the Atm o sphere (CIRA) at Colorado Stat e

University

. CIRA has co nsiderable expertise in we b- based delivery of com p le x technical data using on-line

relational databases. The VIEWS/TSS sy stems are l e veraged wit h extram ur al projects funded by NASA and

EPA OAQPS

. The TSS portion of t h ese sy stems is also directl y supported by limited scope external contract or

efforts to assi st haze i m ple mentation planners at the st ates and EPA with analy s is and interpretation of the

regional em i s sions and m o deling results, due to the larg e num ber of Class I ar ea s and diverse mix of sources and

transport affecting these areas.

The national VIEWS data sy stem for all Class I areas was developed and historic ally f unded by the 5 Regional

Planning Org a nizations (RPOs). Fro m the EPA FFY08 gr ant c y cle, WRAP and the other four RPOs ea ch

contributed $ 30,0 00 for VI EWS operations in 2 009

. WR AP staff manages that work on behalf of the other

RPOs. With no FFY09 EP A grant funds available from th e other four RPOs for VIEWS operations in 2 0 1 0

, WRAP is covering m i ni m u m “bare bones” joint operations of VIEWS/TSS, $125,000 of t h e resources iden tified

in Appendi x A.

Fire E m issio n s Tracking Sy stem (FETS ) Operations

The FETS for the WRAP region has been on-li ne since Se ptem ber 2007 and dat a provi ders continue t o be

added. The FETS is designed to be the data support s y stem for track ing fire em i s sions for regional haze

reasonable progress requirem e nts, and will be the primary s ource of future fire invent ories. Through Septem ber

2009, the FE TS project will be managed as a subcontract under the CIRA TSS contract. At that time, a new

separate contract will be issued for FETS , for direct pr oj ect control by WGA staff, a nd to reduce the already low

overhead cost of a subcontr act through C I RA. The ne w contract will cover FETS ope rations f r om October 2009

throug h Decem b er 2010.

Ha z e SIP Co mpletion Projects

The projects described assi st with regional haze pla nning and im plementation by providing ana l y ses and results

for direct app lication in su pport of im plem entation pl an com p letio n, review, approval, and tracking.

Tech Sy stem Support to I W G

This project to support the WRAP Im plementation Wo rkGroup (I WG) responsible for haze im pl ementation plan

preparation, review, and im pl e mentati on is one of two lim ited sco pe external contractor efforts to assist haze

i m ple m entati on planners at the states an d EPA with trai ning o n the analy s is tools and interpret a tion of the

regional analy s is results, due to the large num ber of Class I ar eas and diverse mix of sources and transport

affecting thes e area s. The primary purpose of this pr oject is to ass ist haze planners with documentation and

training on regional em is si ons and m odeling analy s is scenar ios. This project also provides lim i t ed resources for

training o state, EPA, and FLM users. This project was request e d by IWG and is critical to assist st ates a nd

EPA with the review, approval, and ong oing im ple m e n tation of the haze plans.

Modeling Re sults and TSS Supp ort

This project to support the WRAP Im plementation Wo rkGroup (I WG) responsible for haze im pl ementation plan

preparation, r e view, and im pl ementation is the second of two lim ited scope external contractor efforts to assist

haze i m ple m e n tation planners at the stat es and EPA with interpretation of regional e m issions , source

apportionm ent, and air qual ity m odeling results, includi ng docum entation of impacts on specific Class I areas.

This project was request e d by IWG and is critical to assist st ates a nd EPA with the review, a pproval, and

ongoi ng im plem entation of the haze plans.

Four Factor Analy s is



### 7Section 308( d)(1) of the Regional Haze Rule requires St ates to set reasonable progress goals toward m eetin g a

national goal of natural visibility co nditions in Class I areas by the y ear 2064. The first reason a ble progress

goals will be established for the planni ng period 2008 t o 2018. The Regional Haze Rule identifies four factors

which should be considered in evaluating potential e m issi on control m e asures to m e et visibility goals. As l i sted

in §308(d)(1)(i) these four factors are as follows:

1. Cost of com p liance

2. Ti m e nece ss a r y for com p liance

3. Energ y and n on-air qualit y environm ental im pacts of co m p liance

4. Re maining us eful life of any existing source subject to such requirements

The purpose of this project is to provide to those WRAP States wh o requested it, help in evaluating these four

factors for additional contr o l m e asures (beyond BAR T ). Stat es participating in t h is project in clude AK, AZ, CO,

ID, ND, NM, SD, WA & WY (NV obs erving). Thes e States first r e quested eval uation of a series of Gener a l

Source Categ o ries, while five (CO, ND, NM, SD & WY ) also identified specific Stationary Sources locat ed

within their r espective states for which they wanted a detailed control evaluation conducted. T h e list of General

Source Categ o ries consisted of the fo llo wing:

i. Reciprocatin g Internal Co m bustion Engines and Tur b ines

ii. Oil & Gas Exploration & P r oduction Field Operations

iii. Natural Ga s Processing Plants

iv. Coal or Oil Fired Industrial Boilers (six category bi ns b y size, then b y age)

v. Wood Fired I ndustrial Boil ers

vi. Gas Fired Industrial Boilers

vii. Cement Manufacturing Pl ants

viii. Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing Plants

ix. Pulp & Paper Plant Lim e Kilns

x. Petroleu m Re finery Process Heat ers

PRP 2018 b I nventor y

The objective of this pr oject was to m a ke a second a nd final revision to the 2 018 e m issions inventor y

projections for point and area sources in the WRAP re gion to provide the m o st c u rrent asses s ment of the

reasonable progress toward visibility goa ls by the WRAP. The focus of this project was to address specifi c

changes that have occurred since co m p letion of the P R P18a invent or y in 200 7. The resulting product is the

second version of the WR AP region 2018 Prelim inary Reasonable Progress em i ssions invent or y

, known a s

PRP18b.

The PRP18b inventor y revisions include d the followi ng elements:

• Included all u pdated BART inform ation available:

1. Incorporated all available f o rmal BART deter m inations;

2. Made and incorporated estimate s of expected BART control levels where BART determ inations had not

been finalized (BART estimates m a de for bot h SO2 and NOx);

3. Addressed all “BART- eligible” or “Subject to BA RT” sources, both for EGUs and for the Non-EGU

universe;

• Revised projections of “fut ure” fossil-fuel plants needed to m e et federal electrical generation dem a nd

forecasts in 2018 (used updated EIA projections of 2018 energy requirements – for the first ti me

incorporated Renewable E n ergy Portfolios where avai lable - deter m ined that existing WRAP region electric

generating capacity , when added to exist i ng State/Lo cal agency EG U perm its, was sufficient to m e et 2018

dem a nd without additi on o f any new fut u re EGU units);

• Incorporated all new rulemaking, perm it lim its, and consent decrees instituted since 2007; and



### 8• Corrected other outstanding issues that were identifie d by the federal, state, or local agencie s within the

WRAP domain as needing to be revised/updated:

1. Modification of various in v e ntor y da ta to be consistent with the Plan 02d em issions inventor y ( n am e

changes, updated stack par a m e t e rs, new or re m oved sources, etc.)

2. Revision of a lim it ed num b e r of area source cat egorie s (i.e., fuel co m bustion em issions in Sout h Dakota

and Californi a, gasoline di stribution emissions in Idaho, residential wood com bustion em issions in

Washington, construction dust in [ C lark Count y ] Nev a da).

3. Revision of facility information (e.g., fa cility IDs, facility nam e s, unit IDs, process IDs, SCC s

, SICs,

etc.) based upon agenc y input.

4. Revision of st ack parameters based upon agency i nput

. 5. Addition of WRAP Phase II oil and gas project e m iss i ons to PRP 18a Area Source E m is sion Summari es

in order to pr ovide relevant com p arisons to the em ission totals in P R P 18b whic h also contain e d O&G

em ission totals.

Modeling S u pport for § 308 an d § 309 S I Ps

The operation and m odeling anal y s is work of the Regi ona l Modeling Center (RMC) are the act ivities covered in

this project. The RMC is co m p leting ni ne y ears of re gional m odeling develo pment and anal ysis work for

WRAP m embers. The remaining work under this pr oj ect is the regional em issi ons processing, air qualit y

m odeling, and docum entation for t hose efforts for the l ast of the 20 18 em issions projection in v e ntories (PRP18b

and PRP18c m v ) for the foundational haze i m plement a tion plans.

§309 Milestone Reports

The four §309 states (AZ, NM, UT, WY) have been tracking and verify ing em i ssions for sources in the SO 2 Milestone Program since their SIPs were originall y s ubm itted in Decem b er 2003. Reports ha ve been com p leted

for 200 3, 2 0 0 4 , 20 05, 200 6

, and 20 07 as well as a SO 2 Milestone Tracking Process Audit report. This project

budget co vers preparation o f the SO 2 Milestone Reports for calendar y ears 2008 a nd 2 009.

The 200 7 rep o rt com p ares the 200 5-20 0 7 sulfur di oxi de em issions with the 200 7 m i lestone for the four § 3 0 9

states particip ating in the Western E m i ssions Backst op Tr ading Pr ogram . This i s a transitional report com p aring

em issions against the 20 07 milestone as calculated under the origin al 2003 State Im plementation Plans (SIP s),

as well as against the revised 20 07 m ilestone as calcu lated under th e current plans (Utah & W yom ing have

subm itted rev i sed SIPs, while Arizona and New Mexico ar e in the process of com p l e ting their revisions). Only

stationary sources emitting greater than 100 tons per year are included in the pr ogram

. Results indicate that the

2005- 200 7 av erage emissio n s were about 33% below t h e revised 20 07 m ilestone for the four § 309 states.

Web Site Maintenance

The WRAP’s website is one of its pr im ary comm unications tools. The budgeted funds will be used by WR AP

staff to continue the contract with the WRAP’s web master through 2010.



### 9

### Appendix A

UNITED S T ATES E N VIRONME N TAL P R OTECTION AGENCY

U N I T E D S T A T E S

E

N

V

I

R

O

N

M

E N T A L 

### REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 9410 5

July 1, 2009 P R O T E C T I O

N A

G E N C Y



### Region 9 Tracking #: 09-468

P a m I n ma n n

Executive D i rector

Western Governor’s Association

1600 Broadway, Suite 1700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Dear Ms. In m a nn:

The U.S. En vironm ental Protection A g ency ha s reserved $152, 484 of Federal Clean Air Act

(CAA) grant funds for the W e stern G overnor’s Asso ciation (WGA). This f unding is targeted for

continu i ng WGA’s work in develop i ng Regional H aze State Im plem entation Plans un der SFR Section

51.308 and 51.309, which are the requirem e nts to im pl e m ent visibility protect ion for Federal Class 1

areas under 169A of the Clean Air Act.

These funds will be awarded by the R e gion 9 Ai r Division as an am endm e n t to your ex isting

grant, XA-96999301-1. Please apply for $152,484 of fe deral funds following the standard application

procedures used for CAA Section 1 03 grant as sistance. The applic ation kit ( i nclud i n g instru ction s ) f o r

available through the internet at http://www.epa.gov/region09/funding/applying.htm l . If you require a

hard copy of the application kit, please contac t the Grant Assistant at (415) 972-3702. The CFDA

nu m b er for this grant is 66.034. Please check that the R9 Tracking # (located in the upper-right hand

corner of this guidance letter) is reflected on the upper-right hand co rner of the application (SF-424).

The application and budget attachm e nts should c ontain sufficient detail to identify the purpose

of the expenditures in the budget. T h e original a nd one copy of your final application and work plan

should be su bm itted to th e address b e low by July 15, 2009:

Grants Managem e nt Office, MTS-7

Managem e nt & Technical Services Division

U. S. Environ m ental Protection Agency, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901

You m a y obtain a copy of the C ode of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Parts 1-4 9 , and the

Office of Managem e nt and Budget (OMB) Circulars, which are applicable to your grant of cooperative

agreem ent, at your local U.S. Governm e nt Bookst o re , or from the U.S. Governm e nt Printing Office at

(202) 512-1800, or through the internet at http://www.epa.go v/region9/funding

.

10

### Questions regarding adm i nistrative m a tters should be referred to your EPA Grants

Managem e nt Specialist, Renee Chan, at (415) 972-3675. Please call Roy Ford, Project Officer at (415)

972-3997 with program m a tic questions.

S i n c e r e l y

,

Stephanie V a lentine

M a n a g e r

Grants And Program Integration Office

A i r D i v i s i o n

Cc: Patr ick Cumm ins, WGA

To m M oore, WGA

11