alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exemption Request

Upper Limit Aviation, Inc.

Upper Limit Flight Services, Inc. dba Upper Limit Aviation, Inc.

619 N 2360 W

Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Office: 801-59-7722

Fax: 801-596-2779

Email: lois@ulaheli.com

To Whom It May Concern:

We are requesting an exemption from section 14 CFR 11.61- 11.101 to allow our part 

91.147 and our part 135 drug testing programs to be combined under the part 135 

operations, under the main company name of Upper Limit Aviation, Inc. Upper Limit 

Flight Services, Inc. does business as Upper Limit Aviation, Inc. 

This exemption upholds the standards of the public interest and common good by

supporting fair, well-managed, transparent and responsible policies. This exemption 

further supports the common legislative practice at the highest levels of public office in 

providing regulatory relief for the public by eliminating unduly burdensome regulations. 

The level of public safety remains the same or better. Combining both companies under 

the Part 135 operations meets the drug testing requirements of both FAA Part 91.147 and 

Part 135. 

In our situation, the 135 certificate is in a separate S corp that is 100 percent owned by 

the parent corporation which is also an S corp. In both state and federal tax laws, an 

exemption exists that allows an S corp to own 100 percent of another S corp. In this case, 

the subsidiary is ignored as a separate entity for income tax purposes and all its income 

and expenses are included as part of the parent company’s tax return without distinction. 

Therefore, we are seeking relief and requesting an exemption from section 14 CFR 

11.61-11.101. The exemption will allow the combined operations of both companies to 

mirror accepted federal and state tax laws. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you 

have any question. 

Lois J. Reid

Upper Limit Aviation, Inc.

801-596-7722

lois@ulaheli.com
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.10 What are the general requirements for operations manuals? ( a ) Each deepwater port must have an operations manual that addresses policies and procedures for normal and emergency operations conducted at the deepwater port. The operations manual must, at a minimum, include the requirements outlined in § 150.15 of this part.
( b ) The operations manual is reviewed and approved by the Commandant (CG-5P), who may consult with the local Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority, as meeting the requirements of the Act and this subchapter. The original manual is approved as part of the application process in part 148 of this chapter.
( c ) The Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority may approve subsequent changes to the operations manual, provided the Commandant (CG-5P) is notified and consulted regarding any significant modifications.
( d ) The manual must be readily available on the deepwater port for use by personnel.
( e ) The licensee must ensure that all personnel are trained and follow the procedures in the manual while at the deepwater port.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39180, July 1, 2013]
Order entered July 23 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00558
- CV
IN RE MICHAEL RAMBER ANSINGH, Relator On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 54515
- 2010



### O RDER In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally GRANTED . The Court ORDERS the trial judge, the Honorable Benjamin N. Smith, Judge of the 380th Judicial District Court, to VACATE the porti on of his March 22, 2013 Order of Enforcement by Contempt and Suspension of Commitment (Possession or Access) that awards real party in interest eighty additional days of possession. Should the trial judge fail to comply with this order, the writ will is sue. The Court ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this
order , a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order.
We ORDER that relator recover his costs of this original proceeding from real part y in
interest.
/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
Served: September 20, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### GRAND CANYON AIRLINES, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### NOTI CE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME On September 1, 2010 , Grand Canyon Airlines, Inc. d/b/a Grand Canyon Airlines d/b/a Scenic Airlines (“GCA”) , a U.S. certificated air carrier, 1 request ed that the Department regist e r the trade name “ Grand Canyon Scenic Airl ines ” for use in certain of its air transportation operations. Part 215 of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. T he rule further states that the Department may r egister such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. W e have identified no other similarly named air carriers authorized to use the name “ Grand Canyon Scenic Airli nes . ” Therefore no other notification is required. Since GCA has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the trade name “ Grand Canyon Scenic Airlines ” by GCA for immediate use in its operations. Dated at Washingto n, D.C. , .

TODD M. HOMAN Director Office of Aviation Analysis An electronic version of this document is available on the W orld W ide W eb at : http://www.regulations.gov

.

1 See Order 2008
- 12
- 10, issued December 19, 2008

.Attachment A SERVICE LIST FOR GR AND CANYON AIRLINES, INC.
MR ALAN R STEPHEN VICE PRESIDENT FOR CORPORATE AFFAIRS GRAND CANYON AIRLINES INC 1265 AIRPORT ROAD BOULDER CITY NV 89005 MR WILLIAM J WEBER CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER FAA AFS
- 900 45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131 DULLES VA 2 0166 MR JOHN WAUGH PRINCIPLE OPERATIONS INSPECTOR FEDERAL AVIATION ADM INISTRATION LAS VEGAS FSDO 19 7181 AMIGO STREET LAS VEGAS NV 89119 MR PETER LYNCH AGC
- 300 ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW WA SHINGTON DC 20591
MS ANNE SUISSA RTS
- 42 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION DOT/RITA/BTS E
- 34 1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE WASHINGTON DC 20590 MR BERNARD STANKUS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION DOT/RITA/BTS RTS
- 42 1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE WASHINGTON DC 20590 MR CLAY MORITZ OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION DOT/RITA/BTS RTS
- 42 1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE WASHINGTON DC 20590
**Exhibit 32(g)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southern Power Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

|   | /s/Ronnie L. Bates

Ronnie L. Bates

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Michael W. Southern

Michael W. Southern

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

     |

 

 

Date:  May 4, 2006
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.25-30 Exceptions. ( a ) The general policies and instructions of the Bureau of the Budget specify when certain services as specifically described in this subpart will be furnished without charge.
( b ) The fees and charges prescribed in this subpart are not applicable when requested by, or furnished to, the following persons, or under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) A person who donated the original document.
( 2 ) A person who has an official, voluntary or cooperative relationship to the Coast Guard in rendering services promoting safety of life and property.
( 3 ) Any agency, corporation or branch of the Federal Government.
( 4 ) A person found guilty by an administrative law judge receives one copy of the transcript of the hearing if he: ( i ) Files a notice of appeal, under 46 CFR 5.30-1; and
( ii ) Requests a copy of the transcript.
( 5 ) A person who has been required to furnish personal documents retained by the Coast Guard.
( 6 ) For other exceptions see 49 CFR 7.97.
(31 U.S.C. 483a; 49 U.S.C. 1655(b)(1); 49 CFR 1.46(b))
[CGFR 67-13, 32 FR 11211, Aug. 2, 1967, as amended by CGD 76-124, 42 FR 23507, May 9, 1977]
# AGENCY:

 Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 January 20, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Blanche Ziv, Rosa Jeong or Ryan Langan, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4207, (202) 482-3853, and (202) 482-1279, respectively. 

## The Applicable Statute 

Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), as amended, are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, all citations to the Department's regulations are to 19 CFR part 351 (1998). 

## Postponement of Final Determination and Extenison of Provisional Measures

                        On December 21, 1999, the Department issued its affirmative preliminary determination in this proceeding. The notice stated we would issue our final determination not later than 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination.                         *See, Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Bulk Aspirin from the People's Republic of China,*65 FR 116 (January 3, 2000).                     

                        On December 28, 1999, pursuant to section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act, Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Factory (“Shandong”), a named respondent in this investigation, requested the Department to postpone the final determination in this investigation. On January 4, 2000, Shandong also requested an extension of the provisional measures (                        *i.e.,*                         suspension of liquidation) to not more than six months, in accordance with the Department's regulations (19 CFR 351.210(e)(2)) and section 735(a)(2) of the Act.                     

                        Because our preliminary determination is affirmative, the respondent requesting the postponement represents a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise from the People's Republic of China, and no compelling reasons for denial exist, we are extending this final determination to not later than 135 days after the publication of the preliminary determination (                        *i.e.*, May 17, 2000). Suspension of liquidation will be extended accordingly.                     

This notice of postponement is published pursuant to section 735(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(g). 

Dated: January 13, 2000.

Robert S. LaRussa, 

Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 00-1373 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711 (512) 463-1312

Friday, May 27, 2022

Mr. Michael R. Abrams General Litigation Division Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711-2548 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Ms. Karen Jean Langsley Langsley Mills Law, LLC PO Box 27344 Denver, CO 80227 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Ms. Karlene Dunn Poll Slate & Associates 2310 Rutland St Houston, TX 77008-2556 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 19-1069 Court of Appeals Number: 10-18-00344-CV Trial Court Number: 17-001284-CV-85
Style: IN THE INTEREST OF J.W., A CHILD

Dear Counsel:
Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion(s) and judgment in the abovereferenced cause. You may obtain a copy of the opinion(s) and judgment through Case Search on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme.aspx . On the Case Search page simply enter the case number and push the Search button to find the docket page for your case. Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk
by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

### THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711 (512) 463-1312

cc: Mr. Eric T. Tai (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mr. Jarvis J. Parsons (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Ms. Nita Whitener (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mr. Eric Scott Houghton (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Ms. Lisa B. Hobbs (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) District Clerk Brazos County (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
#### § 181.5 Purpose and applicability.

This subpart prescribes requirements for the certification of boats and associated equipment to which 46 U.S.C. Chapter 43 applies and to which a safety standard prescribed in Part 183 of this chapter applies.

[CGD 85-002, 51 FR 37573, Oct. 23, 1986]
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: June 15, 2015

S15Y0878. IN THE MATTER OF PERRIN BOWIE LOVETT.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a Notice of Discipline

seeking the disbarment of Perrin Bowie Lovett (State Bar No. 141969). The

State Bar has filed a proof of service showing that it personally served Lovett

on March 24, 2015. As Lovett failed to file a Notice of Rejection, he is in

default, has waived his rights to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such

discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See Bar

Rule 4-208.1 (b).

The facts, as deemed admitted by virtue of Lovett’s default, show that a

client paid Lovett $1,000 to represent her in being appointed as administrator of

the estate of her sister, who died intestate. Lovett told the client that it would

take at least a year to accomplish her goal and that she should contact him at the

end of that time. When the client attempted to contact Lovett after a year,

however, she found that his office was closed and that his phone had been
disconnected. Following her efforts to locate Lovett, he called her and told her

that he was no longer practicing law, but that his previous landlord would

complete her case for no additional fee. The client contacted the landlord who

denied any agreement to handle her case. Lovett failed to refund any of the fee

the client paid or to return the client’s file to her, despite her requests to do so.

Lovett failed to submit a response to the Investigative Panel in this matter. It

appears that Lovett, who is currently suspended pursuant to Bar Rule 4-204.3

and for failure to pay Bar dues, has abandoned his practice. 

Based on these facts, the StateBar contends that Lovett violatedRules 1.2,

1.3, 1.4, 1.16, 8.4 (a) (4), and 9.3. of the Rules of Professional Conduct found

in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.2, 1.3,

or 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment, while the maximumsanction for a violation of Rules

1.4, 1.16, or 9.3 is a public reprimand.

In support of its request to disbar Lovett, the StateBar asserts that he acted

willfully and dishonestly in abandoning the legal matter entrusted to him and

that he acted willfully and dishonestly in telling his client that another attorney

would complete her case at no extra cost. The Bar noted that Lovett has no prior

disciplinary history.

2
Having reviewed the record, we agree that disbarment is the appropriate

sanction. Therefore, it hereby is ordered that the name of Perrin Bowie Lovett

be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to practice law in the State of

Georgia. Lovett is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred. All the Justices concur.

3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

Docket Number: 00-009. Applicant: Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model CM300. Manufacturer: Philips, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 65 FR 25708. Order Date: February 23, 1999. 

                    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as the                           ( print page 36117)                        instrument is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: The foreign instrument is a conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States at the time of order of the instrument.                 

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 00-14353 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.553 Security Zone; Salem and Hope Creek Generation Stations, Delaware River, Salem County, New Jersey. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: the waters of the Delaware River in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generation Stations bounded by a line drawn from a point located at 39°28′08.0′′ N, 075°32′31.7′′ W to 39°28′06.5′′ N, 075°32′47.4′′ W, thence to 39°27′28.4′′ N, 075°32′15.8′′ W, thence to 39°27′28.8′′ N, 075°31′56.6′′ W, thence to 39°27′39.9′′ N, 075°31′51.6′′ W, thence along the shoreline to the point of 39°28′08.0′′ N, 075°32′31.7′′ W. All coordinates reference Datum: NAD 1983.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations governing security zones in § 165.33 of this part.
( 2 ) No person or vessel may enter or navigate within this security zone unless authorized to do so by the Coast Guard or designated representative. Any person or vessel authorized to enter the security zones must operate in strict conformance with any directions given by the Coast Guard or designated representative and leave the security zone immediately if the Coast Guard or designated representative so orders.
( 3 ) The Coast Guard or designated representative enforcing this section can be contacted on VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13 and 16. The Captain of the Port can be contacted at (215) 271-4807.
( 4 ) The Captain of the Port will notify the public of any changes in the status of this security zone by Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22 (157.1 MHZ).
( c ) *Definitions.* For the purposes of this section, *Captain of the Port* means the Commanding Officer of the Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay, or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act as a designated representative on his behalf.
[CGD05-03-113, 69 FR 5279, Feb. 4, 2004]