alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated September 9, 2003  accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements of Financial Content,  Inc., (f/k/a Cosmoz  Infrastructure
Solutions,  Inc.,,  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30,
2003 and 2002 which is included in this  Registration  Statement.  We consent to
the inclusion of our report in this Registration Statement.


/s/ Pohl, McNabola, Berg, & Company LLP
----------------------------------------
Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company LLP


San Francisco, California
October 8, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Annual Report of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas J. Leech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Douglas J. Leech
--------------------

Douglas J. Leech
Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2004


                                       42
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00453-CV

GUILLERMO R. PECHERO, M.D.

v.

AGUSTIN GARCIA AND RONALD JACKSON

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-10-2331-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be set aside and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court SET ASIDE

and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of 

the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 16, 2105
507-/5"

ELECTRONIC RECORD $*0%mt&

C0A# 06-14-00066-CR OFFENSE: 22.021

William Jason Pugh v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Wood

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 402nd Judicial District Court

DATE: 4/15/15 Publish: No TC CASE #: 22,041-2013

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CCA# 5b%»IS William Jason Pugh v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

PEP SE

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: O^j/^/^Oir

JUDGE: 1ULslAA^tjL^—

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk August 10, 2011

0810 

# Order

August 10, 2011

143028

ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 143028

COA: 291989

Oakland CC: 2004

- 057182

- CC

OAKLAND COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION,

Defendant

- Third

- Party/

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v

THOMPSON

- McCULLY COMPANY, a/k/a

THOMPSON

- McCULLY COMPANY, L.L.C.,

Third

- Party Defendant/

Third

- Party Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v

OAKLAND EXCAVATING COMPANY,

OWEN TREE SERVICE, and ACKLEY

CONSTRUCTION,

Third

- Party Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
# ToC

# Staff vol by State

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-8: p. &P	

# Staff vol by Region

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-8: p. &P
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.T08-0713 Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi river, Natchez, MS. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Lower Mississippi River from Mile Marker (MM) 368 through MM 370.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Lower Mississippi River (COTP) or the COTP's designated representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Sector Lower Mississippi River.
( 2 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative via VHF-FM channel 16 or by telephone at 901-521-4822. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
( c ) *Enforcement period.* This rule is effective without actual notice on December 18, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from December 9, 2020 until December 17, 2020.
( d ) *Information broadcasts.* The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public of the enforcement times and date for this safety zone through Broadcast Notices to Mariners, Local Notices to Mariners, and/or Safety Marine Information Broadcasts, as appropriate.
[USCG-2020-0713, 85 FR 82358, Dec. 18, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that a 
closed meeting of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be 
held.

DATES: Tuesday, September 20, 2011, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia 
22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information concerning the 
meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of 
Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
4000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the provisions of section 10(d) of 
Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the 
meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the 
matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of 
the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered 
were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee 
that the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

    Dated: August 18, 2011.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-21483 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.T05-0915 Safety Zones; Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel, Chesapeake Bay Entrance, VA. ( a ) *Location.* The following areas are safety zones: ( 1 ) Any waters located within 500 feet in all directions from the edge of South Thimble Island. South Thimble Island is located approximately 3.3 miles north of the shores of Virginia Beach on Highway 13, also known as the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel (CBBT).
( 2 ) Any waters located within 500 feet in all directions from the edge of North Thimble Island. North Thimble Island is located approximately 4.5 miles north of Virginia Beach on Highway 13.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, *designated representative* means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Virginia (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zones. The term also includes an employee or contractor of Chesapeake Tunnel Joint Venture (CTJV) for the sole purpose of designating and establishing safe transit corridors, to permit passage into or through the safety zones listed in paragraph (a) of this section, or to notify vessels and individuals that they have entered a safety zone and are required to depart immediately.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, no vessel or person may enter or remain in any safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP, or designated representative. If a vessel or person is notified by the COTP, or designated representative, that they have entered one of these safety zones without permission, they are required to immediately depart in a safe manner following the directions given.
( 2 ) Mariners requesting to transit any of these safety zones must first contact the CTJV designated representatives, CTJV Marine General Superintendant by phone at 361-244-8852, CTJV Safety Director at 702-415-8600, or CTJV Construction Manager at 757-782-7741. CTJV will be monitoring VHF-FM channels 13 and 16 while work is ongoing. If permission is granted, mariners must proceed at their own risk and strictly observe any and all instructions provided by the COTP, or designated representative, to the mariner regarding the conditions of entry to and exit from any location within the fixed safety zones.
( d ) *Enforcement.* The Sector Virginia COTP may enforce the regulations in this section and may be assisted by any Federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency.
( e ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced until January 31, 2027, unless cancelled sooner by the COTP.
[USCG-2021-0915, 87 FR 52469, Aug. 26, 2022] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: By USCG-2021-0915, 87 FR 52469, Aug. 26, 2022, § 165.T05-0915 was added, effective Sept. 26, 2022, to Jan. 31, 2027.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-38236, 333-38250, 333-47326, 333-87092 and 333-97787) and Form S-8
filed as post-effective amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4
(No. 333-103434) of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. of our report dated April 17, 2008
relating to the financial statements, financial statement
schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 3,
2008.

|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP
|------------------------------------
|Greensboro, North Carolina          

April 17, 2008

---
Order entered April 29 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01454

- CV
RYAN CHANDLER, Appellant

V.
WOODFOREST BANK, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 02368

- C



### O RDER
The reporter’s record is overdue. By letter dated March 26, 2019, Janet Wright, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 3, informed the Court that appellant had not

re quested preparation of the reporter’s record. By letter dated April 3, 2019, the Court instructed appellant to file, within ten days, written verification that he had requested preparation of the reporter’s record and written verification that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee or written documentation that he had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply might result in the Court ordering the appeal be submitted wi thout the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). As of today’s date, appellant has not responded. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See id

. Appellant shall file his brief on the merits on or before Ma y 2 9 , 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Program Instructions

TO: STATE AND AREA AGENCIES ON AGING ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER THE OLDER AMERICANS 

ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED

SUBJECT: Certification on Maintenance of Effort for Title III - Fiscal Year 2001

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES: 45 CFR 1321.49; and Section 309(c) of the Older Americans Act, 

as Amended

This program instruction requests the authorized official in each state agency on aging to submit a 

certification on maintenance of effort under Title III of the Older Americans Act for fiscal year 2001. As 

set forth in 45 CFR 1321.49, the state agency maintenance of effort level is to be determined 

annually: 

"In order to avoid a penalty, each fiscal year the State Agency, to meet the required nonfederal share 

applicable to its allotments under this part, shall spend under the State plan for both services and 

administration at least the average amount of state funds it spent under the plan for the three 

previous fiscal years. If the State Agency spends less than this amount, the Assistant Secretary 

reduces the State's allotments for supportive and nutrition services under this part by a percentage 

equal to the percentage by which the State reduced its expenditures." 

In reporting the amount of state expenditures for the maintenance of effort requirement, states may 

include expenditures incurred under the cost allocation plan for the state agency. 

The authorized official in each state agency is requested to certify to the Administration on Aging the 

amount of state resources expended in fiscal year 2001 to meet the maintenance of effort 

requirements under Title III of the Older Americans Act, and whether that amount was or was not 

equal to the required maintenance of effort level. 

Attached is a certification form which has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). The certification form must be signed by the authorized state agency official and submitted to 

the Regional Administrators, Administration on Aging, no later than February 28, 2003. 

DUE DATE : Due February 28, 2003 to Regional Administrators, Administration on Aging. 

ATTACHMENT : Certification of Maintenance of Effort Form OMB-0980-0009 

INQUIRIES : State agencies should address inquiries to Regional Administrators, Administration on 

Aging, HHS Regional Offices. 
Josefina G. Carbonell

Assistant Secretary for Aging
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-30002

KIMBERLY ANN GREENWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

VERSUS

RAYTHEON AEROSPACE, INC., ET Al.

Defendants

RAYTHEON AEROSPACE, INC. and WAYNE LEESE,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-2138)

December 22, 1997

Before DAVIS, JONES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM *

Appellants Raytheon Aerospace, Inc. (“Raytheon”) and Wayne

Leese (“Leese”) appeal a jury verdict in favor of Kimberly Ann

Greenwell on her claims of sex-based discrimination under Title VII

and Louisiana anti-discrimination laws.2

Having considered the oral and written arguments of counsel

a nd the record in this case, we see no reversible error in the

rulings or judgment of the district court, except as to the award

of punitive damages. With respect to the latter issue, however, we

conclude that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence

from which a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that Raytheon

engaged in discriminatory practices “with malice or with reckless

indifference to the federally protected rights of [the plaintiffappellee].” 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(1); s ee Patterson v. P.H.P.

Healthcare Corp.
, 90 F.3d 927, 943-44 (5th Cir. 1996); Fa rpellaCrosby v. Horizon Health Care
, 97 F.3d 803, 809-10 (5th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED in

part, to vacate the award of punitive damages, and AFFIRMED in all

other respects.
**DOOR COUNTY**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES**

**Aging & Disability Resource Center**

****916 North 14th Avenue

Sturgeon Bay, WI  54235

**Jake Erickson, Director**

Telephone: (920) 746-2372

Fax: (920) 743-8553

adrc@co.door.wi.us

«Date»

«First_Name» «Last_Name»

«Address1»

«Address2»

«City»

**This is not a bill or an invoice.**

**If you have already contributed to the cost of your monthly meals, please disregard this reminder.**

Thank you for participating in our home delivered nutrition program! Our meals have proven to be a valuable and necessary community resource in order to help people remain in their own homes. Donations toward the cost of the home delivered meals you have received are very much appreciated and important to continue the program. 

**Please contribute what your budget allows.**

**You will not be denied a meal if you are unable to contribute.**

We are required to provide you the opportunity to contribute to the cost of this service. The actual cost to our agency to provide this meal is «Real_Unit_Cost_text» per meal. Contributions to help offset the cost of meals are essential to maintaining nutrition services for our community’s older adults. Contributions from participants, their families, and others directly fund the meals we provide and are combined with federal, state, and local funds to provide this service. 

The suggested contribution is «Unit_Cost_text» per meal. Our records show that you received «Total_Units» in «Month», which amounts to a total suggested contribution of «Cost_text». Please contribute what your budget allows. You will not be denied a meal if you are unable to contribute. We are committed to protecting the privacy of your contributions.

Contributions are accepted in:

· Check or Money Order:  Please make any checks payable to: ADRC of Door County 

· Cash:  For security reasons, please be cautious about sending cash via mail.

**You may mail contributions to 916 N. 14th Avenue, Sturgeon Bay, WI, 54235**

If you have any questions or comments, contact Wendy Schubert at wschubert@co.door.wi.us or 920-746-2523.

Thank you for your support!

**______________________________________________________________________________________**

 Please return the bottom portion of this letter with your contribution. 

**Door County Nutrition Program Meal Summary for «Month»**

***On the back side of this sheet, please write comments you would like to share with us about your meals (or attach a separate note if you wish)***

# image1.wmf

# oleObject1.bin
Order entered December 17, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00620 - CV CECILIA BERTAUD, Appellant

V. WOLNER IND USTRIES , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. CC - 15 - 02007 - E



### O RDER On November 25, 2015, appellant filed both a pro se brief and a motion for an extension of time to retain a lawyer. In a letter dated December 14, 2015, the Court informed appellant her brief was deficient and instructed her to file , within ten days, an amended brief correcting the deficiencies. We GRANT appellant’s motion for an extension of time to retain a lawyer. Appellant shall notify this Court, by JANUARY 18, 2016 , with the name, State Bar number, address, phone number , and email address of new counsel. Appellant’s amended brief is now due JANUARY 28, 2016

. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: June 5, 2000.
    Time: 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To Review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Bruce Maurer, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5222, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1168.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 30, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-14331 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 158.320 Reception facilities: Capacity, and exceptions. ( a ) Except as allowed in paragraph (b) of this section, each day the port or terminal is in operation, the port or terminal must have a reception facility that is capable of receiving— ( 1 ) 75 cubic meters (19,810 gallons) of NLS residue for each regulated NLS cargo that is a solidifying Category A NLS; or
( 2 ) 50 cubic meters (13,210 gallons) of NLS residue for each regulated NLS cargo that is not a solidifying Category A.
( b ) The port or terminal need only meet § 158.330 if it is used by ships that only transfer Category B or C NLS cargoes that are not high viscosity or solidifying Category B or C NLSs.
( c ) For each category of NLS cargo carried on a ship, each day a ship repair yard is in operation and being used by a ship that must discharge NLS residue in order to proceed with repair work, the ship repair yard must have a reception facility that is capable of receiving— ( 1 ) 50 cubic meters (13,210 gallons) of NLS residue that contains a— ( i ) Category A NLS that is not a solidifying NLS;
( ii ) Category B NLS; or
( iii ) Category C NLS; or
( iv ) Category D NLS; or
( 2 ) 75 cubic meters (19,810 gallons) of NLS residue that contains a Category A NLS that is a solidifying NLS cargo.