alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit


32.2








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
      Isco, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              December 7, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Jay IscoJay
                Isco, Chief Financial Officer




35
(logo) Huntington Mortgage Company

Report of Management

We, as members  of  management  of The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company  (HMC),  a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Huntington  National Bank, are  responsible  for
complying  with the minimum  servicing  standards  as set forth in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  (USAP).  We are  also  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining
effective  internal  control  over  compliance  with  these  standards.  We have
performed an evaluation of HMC's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
as set forth in the USAP as of  December  31,  1999 and for the year then ended.
Based on this  evaluation,  we assert  that during the year ended  December  31,
1999,  HMC  complied,  in all  material  respects,  with the  minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  HMC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $60,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $12,000,000.

Thomas J. Finnegan III
President and Chief Executive Officer

Irving A. Adler
Senior Vice President

March 8, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Report of Vertical  Computer  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:    April 13, 2006                      By:    /s/ David Braun
                                                    ---------------
                                             Name:  David Braun
                                             Title: Principal Accounting Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided  to  Vertical  Computer
Systems,  Inc.  and will be retained  by Vertical  Computer  Systems,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
------------

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Frederic Richardson certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Innofone.com Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
          of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: October 13, 2004



/s/ Frederic Richardson
---------------------------
Frederic Richardson,
President, CEO & CFO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-36]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, transmittal 00-36 with attached transmittal, policy justification, Sensitivity of Technology, and section 620C(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

Dated: May 24, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 34670)          ( print page 34671)          ( print page 34672)          ( print page 34673)          ( print page 34674)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-13523  Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
#### Cooper *v.*Cooper.

Argued November 19,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Freeman. Coweta superior court. September 29, 1905.

*W. G.*Wright, for plaintiff in error.

*W. L. Stallings*and *B. O.*Jones, contra.

Lumpkin, J.

Upon the hearing of the writ of habeas corpus by the wife against the husband, to obtain the custody of three of their minor children, under the evidence there was no abuse of discretion in awarding such custody to the applicant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000002589
<NAME> AERO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,094
<PP&E>                                          14,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           766
<OTHER-SE>                                         261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,174
<SALES>                                         19,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,531
<CGS>                                           15,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    298
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C 1350In connection with the Quarterly Report of Akorn, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which thisCertification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does herebycertify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR240.13a-14(b)), that to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 8, 2007    /s/ ARTHUR S. PRZYBYL     Arthur S. Przybyl  Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.502 What are the maintenance and repair requirements for lifesaving equipment? ( a ) Each deepwater port must have on board, or in the operator's principal office in the case of an unmanned port, the manufacturer's instructions for performing onboard maintenance and repair of the port's lifesaving equipment. The instructions must include the following for each item of equipment, as applicable: ( 1 ) Instructions for maintenance and repair;
( 2 ) A checklist for use when carrying out the monthly inspections required under § 150.513 of this part;
( 3 ) A schedule of periodic maintenance;
( 4 ) A diagram of lubrication points with the recommended lubricants;
( 5 ) A list of replaceable parts;
( 6 ) A list of spare parts sources; and
( 7 ) A log for records of inspections and maintenance.
( b ) In lieu of the manufacturer's instructions required under paragraph (a) of this section, the deepwater port may have its own onboard planned maintenance program for maintenance and repair that is equivalent to the procedures recommended by the equipment manufacturer.
( c ) The deepwater port must designate a person in charge of ensuring that maintenance and repair is carried out in accordance with the instructions required in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) If deficiencies in the maintenance or condition of lifesaving equipment are identified, the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority may review the instructions under paragraph (a) of this section and require appropriate changes to the instructions or operations to provide for adequate maintenance and readiness of the equipment.
( e ) When lifeboats, rescue boats, and liferafts are not fully operational because of ongoing maintenance or repairs, there must be a sufficient number of fully operational lifeboats and liferafts available for use to accommodate all persons on the deepwater port.
( f ) Except in an emergency, repairs or alterations affecting the performance of lifesaving equipment must not be made without notifying the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority in advance. The person in charge must report emergency repairs or alterations to lifesaving equipment to the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority, as soon as practicable.
( g ) The person in charge must ensure that spare parts and repair equipment are provided for each lifesaving appliance and component subject to excessive wear or consumption.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39182, July 1, 2013]
[Civ. No. 10462.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

June 25, 1937.]

#### AMANDA M. PETERSON, Appellant, v. CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

James F. Peck and Elizabeth M. Maxwell for Appellant.

McKee, Tasheira & Wahrhaftig for Respondents.

SPENCE, Acting P. J.

—Plaintiff brought an action similar to that brought in the companion case entitled *Peterson*v. *Corporation of America,*No. 10461, the opinion in which last mentioned case has been this day filed *(ante,*p. 527 [69 Pac. (2d) 904]). Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

The facts in the two cases are substantially the same for the purpose of this discussion except as hereinafter noted. The deed of trust here was executed by E. J. Burg and Beatrice Burg, his wife, as further security for the note in the sum of $296,920.81. It covered a single parcel of land, containing within its boundaries five contiguous lots, which said parcel was improved with a gasoline service station. Prior to the sale the trustors conveyed to plaintiff Amanda M. Peterson subject to the deed of trust. The notice of sale under this deed of trust consisted of but one sheet. A copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place upon said property upon a post similar to that described in the other case. Upon the sale, the property was sold to defendant Bank of America for the sum of $13,411.

The contentions of appellant here are all covered by the discussion in the opinion above mentioned and for the *746reasons stated in said opinion, we conclude that no ground for reversal has been shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Dooling, J., *pro tem.,*concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 23, 1937.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned are the President and Chief Financial Officer of Reclamation
Consulting and Applications, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate is made
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification
accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
June 30, 2007 (the "10-KSB Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date: October 15, 2007                      /s/ GORDON W. DAVIES
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gordon W. Davies
                                            President

Date: October 15, 2007                      /s/ PAUL HUGHES
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Paul Hughes
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and will be retained
by Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Crea e innova

Aporta

Visita acl.gov/oam para obtener mayor información.
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 150/5345-39C - Specification for L-853, Runway and Taxiway Retroreflective Markers (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5345-39C
- Title
- Specification for L-853, Runway and Taxiway Retroreflective Markers
- Date cancelled
- 2011-09-26
- Cancellation notes
- AC 150/5345-39D
- Date issued
- 2006-09-14
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Engineering Division 
- Description
-  	Contains the FAA standards for retroreflective markers for airport runways and taxiways. **See also Errata Sheet below.** 
- Content
-    -  150/5345-39C  (PDF) 
  -  Errata Sheet for 150/5345-39C (October 5, 2006)  (MS Word) 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 410 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 410

     Designating February 17, 2008, as ``Race Day in America'' and 
           highlighting the 50th running of the Daytona 500.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2007

  Mr. Nelson of Florida (for himself, Mr. Martinez, and Mr. Sanders) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating February 17, 2008, as ``Race Day in America'' and 
           highlighting the 50th running of the Daytona 500.

Whereas the Daytona 500 is the most prestigious stock car race in the United 
        States;
Whereas the Daytona 500 annually kicks off the National Association for Stock 
        Car Auto Racing (NASCAR) Sprint Cup Series, NASCAR's top racing series;
Whereas millions of racing fans have spent the 3rd Sunday of each February since 
        1959 watching, listening to, or attending the Daytona 500;
Whereas the purse for the Daytona 500 is typically the largest in motor sports;
Whereas winning the prestigious Harley J. Earl Trophy is stock car racing's 
        greatest prize and privilege;
Whereas nearly 1,000,000 men and women in the Armed Forces in nearly 180 
        countries worldwide listen to the race on the radio via the American 
        Forces Network;
Whereas Daytona International Speedway is the home of ``The Great American 
        Race''--the Daytona 500;
Whereas fans from all 50 States and many foreign nations converge on the ``World 
        Center of Racing'' each year to see the motor sports spectacle;
Whereas Daytona International Speedway becomes one of the largest cities in the 
        State of Florida by population on race day, with more than 200,000 fans 
        in attendance;
Whereas well-known politicians, celebrities, and athletes take part in the 
        festivities surrounding the Daytona 500; and
Whereas, on February 17th, 2008, the Daytona 500 celebrates its historic 50th 
        running: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 50th running of the Daytona 500, ``The 
        Great American Race'', on February 17, 2008; and
            (2) designates February 17, 2008, as ``Race Day in 
        America'' in honor of the Daytona 500.
                                 <all>
```
IMPORTANT MEDICAL INFORMATION

Name:

I prefer to be addressed as:

Phone:

Birthdate: Blood type:

Medical conditions:

Health care provider names and contact information:

Medicines and dosages:

Allergies:

Medical/assistive devices:

Learn more: acl.gov/programs/emergency-preparedness
Emergency contact information:

Date of last tetanus shot:

Recent surgeries

Dietary restrictions:

Do you have an advance directive? Yes No

If so, where is it located? 

Service animal information:

Other important things to know about me: