alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

|                    |  |                                                                                                               |  | 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Warren D. Edwards                                                                                         |  | 
|                    |  |                                                                                                               |  | 
|                    |  | Warren D. Edwards,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc. |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Subject: RE: Public Hearing

From: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 7:38 PM 

To: ejefferson@kc.rr.com; Garrett.Pamela@epamail.epa.gov; Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: Reeves, David 

Subject: Re: Public Hearing 

Ms. Jefferson, 

Pam Garrett is the contact person to notify to request a public hearing; I have forwarded your request to 

her and to others. We will address your questions on Monday when I'm back in the office. 

Thanks, 

Susan Fairchild 

Environmental Scientist 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

direct line: 919.541.5167 

fax: 919.541-3207 

email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Overnight mail address: 

US EPA 

Mail Code D243-04 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709 

-----"Elnora" <ejefferson@kc.rr.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Elnora" <ejefferson@kc.rr.com> 

Date: 12/02/2011 02:22PM 

Subject: Public Hearing 

Ms. Fairchild, 

 I am writing to you today to ask for your guidance in the matter of requesting and 

holding a public hearing regarding the EPA’s new rule as it relates to CR+6 emissions from 

insulation manufacturing plants. I understand that you are my point of contact for making the 

request and that it must be submitted to you either in wiring or verbally by close of business on 

Monday, Dec. 5. Please confirm. I also understand that once requested, that the hearing must 

be held by Monday, December 12. Please confirm. Then, will you direct me to references 

regarding the public’s responsibilities in calling this meeting, possible outcomes and 

expectations. Please also include the EPA’s responsibilities once it has received the request for 

the public meeting anad in your response, please include a list of persons that the names and 

titles of the persons whom the EPA will ask to attend. 
2

Finally, feel free to make any suggestions that would yield the highest level of relevant and 

meaningful information so that the community of people who attend the public meeting will 

have a full and complete understanding of the issues, the solutions and the possible outcomes--

thank you-- 

Elnora Tellis Jefferson, president, Oak Grove Neighborhood Association, Inc. 

913-371-2858
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial Officer ofAeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form  10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the periodended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

 
|   |   | /s/ John Adamovich, Jr.   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                      |
|   |   | Name: John Adamovich, Jr. |
|   |   |                      |
|   |   | Date: February 7, 2007    |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
ADDRESSING ORAL HEALTH AND EFFECTIVENESS OF HOME DELIVERED MEALS IN NYC

SIX ITEM SCREENER1 

PHASE 1- SUBJECT RECRUITMENT

PARTICIPANT ID____________________________________

RECORDER________________________________________

DATE_________________

INSTRUCTIONS TO THE PARTICIPANT: 

“I would like to ask you some questions that ask you to use your memory. I am going to say three 

words. Please wait until I say all three words, then repeat them. Remember what they are because I am 

going to ask you name them again in a few minutes. 

Please repeat these words for me: APPLE-TABLE-PENNY” (Recorder may repeat three times, but 

repetition not scored)

1. Did respondent correctly repeat all three words? 

YES.....go to question 2 

 

NO...... Reason 

H=Hearing Loss

E = Not proficient in English

R = Refusal

Score Correct Correct Don’t Know

2. What year is this? 1 0 0

3. What month is this? 1 0 0

4. What is the day of the week? 1 0 0

 What were the three objects I asked you to remember?

5. Apple = 1 0 0

6. Table = 1 0 0

7. Penny = 1 0 0

Score of 3 or more – eligible for the study; Score of 1 or 2 – not eligible.

Eligible for study: Y N 

1 Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive 

impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Medical Care 2002; 40(9): 771-781.

IRB-AAAR6590 (Y02M00)

IRB Approval Date: 03/01/2019

For use until: 02/29/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 7 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 7

            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 o'clock 
meridian unless otherwise ordered.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8201** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOEL ANDREW BAYAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern D istrict of Virginia , at Newport News
. Rebecca Beach Smith , District Judge. ( 4:08

- cr - 00128

- RBS

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by u n published per curiam opinion
. Joel Andrew Bayan, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joel Andrew Bay an seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his “supplemental brief” as a successive 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2009 ) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewis e debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bayan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we constru e Bayan ’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain3 authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be su fficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C. A. § 22 55(h ) (West Supp. 2009)
. Bayan ’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to fi le a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Report prepared by: 

* c 

INASA-CB-179961) NONLZNEAR IhlPRARED N87-3 3498 

GENEtiATIOM IN AZKBLf EETAL VBEORS: STEADY 

SXATE SUSCEPTIBlLI?IE$ AND DPIAMTC BEHAVIOR, 

EFPECTXVE BELAXP.TICI GATES ANC PRELIMINSBY Unc la s 

fiAl4AN GAIN Pi3EDICIIONS FOR THE Cs SYSTEB 63/25 43640 

Technical Progress Report 

to the 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 

Greenbelt, MD 20771 

For the period: July 1, 1986 - December 31, 1986 

Nonlinear Infrared Generation in Alkali Metal Vapors: 

Steady State Susceptibilities and Dynamic Behavior 

NAG 5-526 

Effective Relaxation Rates and Preliminary 

Raman Gain Predictions for the Cs System 

from 

Nabil M. Lawandy 

Division of Engineering 

Brown University 

Providence, RI 029 12 

d&dL&q 

Nabil M. Lawandy - Associate Profesor of 

Engineering and Physics 

Principal Investigator 

/ 

Carl Cometta 

Executive Oficer 

Division of Engineering 

I 

18 December 1986 
Effective Rates for the Cs System Pumped by 

Doubled Alexandrite Radiation 

Laser Level: 18s 1/2> 

Resonance Level: 13> = 18P 1/2> 

1 - 1 1 -- +- 

T2 t8P7S -k t7S6P + t6P6S bP6S 

Laser Level: 19s 1/2> 

Resonance Level: 18P 1/2> 

1 1 

-1- 
27632 

27637 9P 

9s 

2691 1 

25792 

241 37 8s @9- 

7s 

18536 

6s 

f8p8s 

21947 

21966 7p 

ENERGY LEVELS OF ATOMIC CESIUM 

-2- 
27632 

27637 9P 

9s 

2691 1 

25792 

8s OS2 c 24137 

‘8~7s , 

8P 

7P 

ENERGY LEVELS OF ATOMIC CESIUM 

-3- 
27632 

27637 9P 

9s 

2691 9 

8s 

24137 

7s 

18536 

L 

25792 

25709 8P 

'21947 

' 21 766 

19 732 

4 1 I78 

7P 

6P 

ENERGY LEVELS OF ATOMIC CESIUM 

-4- 
0 

s3 

9s 

2691 1 * 

8s 

24137 

7s 

18536 

27632 

I*r 27637 9P 

25792 

25709 8P 

21947 

21766 7p 

11732 6o 

-I 

11178 

ENERGY LEVELS OF ATOMIC CESIUM 

-5- 
0 

s3 

9s 

2691 1 

8s 

241 37 

7s 

18536 

6s 

27632 

27637 

25792 

25709 

21 947 

21 766 

11 732 

11 178 

9P 

8P 

7P 

6P 

6p6s 

ENERGY LEVELS OF ATOMIC CESIUM 

-6- 
ENERGY LEVELS OF ATOMIC CESIUM 

-7- 
I* ' '. 

i 

Y 

43 

a 

S 

a 

E 

43 

L 

cr 

43 

n 

f2 

0 

7 

W 

E 

9 

H 

0 

Q 

x 

L 

.VI 

P I I I 1 I I I I I I 

1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 

Infrared wave number (cm-') 

I 

25000 Corresponding Doubled A1 exandri te 

wave number 

in a 200P diameter spot size. 

Cesium Raman Transition: 6s to 8s 

Resonance Level 8p 

26000 

I 
I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 

I I I I 

400 600 

I 1 I I I I I I 

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 

Infrared wave number (cm-' ) 

27000 Corresponding Doubled Alexandrite 28600 

wave number 

Pumped with a peak pulse height of 0.5MW 

in a 200P diameter spot size. 

Cesium Raman Transition: 6s to 9s 

Resonance Level 9p 

-9-
# United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit

No. 16-1771

ANDREW MARCH,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

JANET T. MILLS, individually and in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maine,

Defendant, Appellant,

CITY OF PORTLAND, MAINE; WILLIAM PREIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Lieutenant of the City of Portland; JASON NADEAU, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Portland; GRAHAM HULTS, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Portland; DONALD KRIER, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Major of the City of Portland,

Defendants.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion of this Court issued on August 8, 2017, is amended as follows:

On page 38, line 4: "Erzoznik" is replaced with "Erznoznik"
#### Nunnally *v.*The State.

Submitted December 17, 1906-,

Decided January 15, 1907.

Accusation of selling liquor. Before Judge Overstreet. City court of Sylvania. September 29, 1906.

Brief for plaintiff in error.

*H. A. Boykin, solicitor,*and *Alfred Herrington,*contra.

Evans, J.

No error of law is complained of, and the evidence was sufficient to uphold the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         472,044
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,004,457
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      9,864,219
<ALLOWANCE>                                    137,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,448,121
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,029,227
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             97,587
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,637
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,315,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,448,121
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                614,496
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              234,439
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                45,687
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               894,622
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             431,270
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             443,057
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          451,565
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  105,377
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                890,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (487,395)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (487,395)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (300,409)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.72
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                42,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,814
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              137,872
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           137,872
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA,

MARIANA LOPEZ,

CARLOS LOPEZ, AND 

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., 

REINIER CORTES, AND 

ANDREA GONZALEZ 

QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE NUNC PRO TUNC

THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court on Second Motion for Extension of 

Discovery Deadline Nunc Pro Tunc, and the Court, after having reviewed the Motion and being 

otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is 

GRANTED:

The Order Setting Trial Deadlines shall be amended to reflect that all discovery shall be 

completed by June 22, 2023.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this _____ day of February 2023.

________________________________ 

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Designated U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record by CM/ECF

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 60-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 161.1 Purpose and Intent. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to promulgate regulations implementing and enforcing certain sections of the 46 U.S.C. Chapter 700 “Ports and Waterways Safety setting up a national system of Vessel Traffic Services that will enhance navigation, vessel safety, and marine environmental protection, and promote safe vessel movement by reducing the potential for collisions, rammings, and groundings, and the loss of lives and property associated with these incidents within VTS areas established hereunder.
( b ) Vessel Traffic Services provide the mariner with information related to the safe navigation of a waterway. This information, coupled with the mariner's compliance with the provisions set forth in this part, enhances the safe routing of vessels through congested waterways or waterways of particular hazard. Under certain circumstances, a VTS may issue directions to control the movement of vessels in order to minimize the risk of collision between vessels, or damage to property or the environment.
( c ) The owner, operator, charterer, master, or person directing the movement of a vessel remains at all times responsible for the manner in which the vessel is operated and maneuvered, and is responsible for the safe navigation of the vessel under all circumstances. Compliance with these rules or with a direction of the VTS is at all times contingent upon the exigencies of safe navigation.
( d ) Nothing in this part is intended to relieve any vessel, owner, operator, charterer, master, or person directing the movement of a vessel from the consequences of any neglect to comply with this part or any other applicable law or regulation (e.g., the International Regulations for Prevention of Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) or the Inland Navigation Rules) or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case.
[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36324, July 15, 1994, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58280, Sept. 18, 2020]
1 

Plating Tips for Your 

Congregate Meals Program

The Importance of Plating for Congregate Meals

Plating adds value to the dining experience. An attractively-plated meal is more 

appetizing to diners and sends a message of quality that words can’t express. It tells 

people that you care about your craft and want them to enjoy their meals as much 

as you enjoyed preparing their meals. Good plating can lead to increased 

participation, support the creativity of the kitchen staff and chefs, and set a positive 

tone for dining; you can use images of your meals to create marketing materials for 

promotion on flyers, social media, and online. The ultimate goal of enhancing 

satisfaction is to increase the potential for repeat participants because they see its 

value.

Key Presentation Factors to Consider

• Color: Color is an easy way to achieve beautiful plating. Multiple colors are 

more appealing to the eye. You can add color using fresh herbs and small 

edible garnishes. 

• Arrangement: Don’t overcrowd a plate—this can be overwhelming. Try to 

create height with tactics such as laying chicken on top of veggies, rice, or 

pasta. If budget is not a problem, get rid of compartmentalized plates and 

opt for round plates. This immediately elevates the meal by getting away

from the “lunch program” look. 

• Texture: Texture can increase meal satisfaction and takes two forms. One is 

the way food feels in the mouth: soft, firm, or crunchy. Second is the exterior

appearance of a food. As with flavor and color, variety is key. Food presented 

together on a plate should be balanced in texture.
2

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for 

Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. 

Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express 

freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily 

represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services 

Programs. For more information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.
Exhibit
      10.1





ASSIGNMENT
      AND BILL OF SALE





For
      ten
      dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt
      of which is hereby acknowledged, Magnum d’Or Resources Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (“Magnum”), hereby sells, transfers and assigns to Sunrise Mining
      Corporation, a Nevada corporation that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magnum,
      all of its mining assets including but not limited to all of its mining leases,
      contract rights, mining joint ventures, real property, personal property,
      inventory, equipment, fixtures, accounts receivable, patents, tradenames,
      vehicles, furniture, choses in action, securities, and all other mining
      properties and any interest therein, known or unknown, contingent or otherwise,
      of any kind or nature.


FURTHER
      AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.


Dated:
                October 25, 2005
            Magnum
                d’Or Resources Inc./s/ Xuguang
              SunXuguang
                Sun, Chief Executive Officer and President