alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Faulk, Scott (OSn

--

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Greetings:

Faulk, Scott (OST)

Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:47 PM

'Russ Machen'; 'cosborn@alamosacounty.org'

Schlemmer, Kevin (OSn

EASProposal

ALS-CEZ bid as of 03-14-14.pdf

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service ("EAS") situation at Alamosa and Cortez, Colorado and

give you an opportunity to submit any comments if you wish. As you may know, the Department of

Transportation issued Order 2014-2-3, on February 4, 2014, to solicit proposals from all interested air carriers to

provide EAS at Alamosa and Cortez for a new contract, beginning August I, 2014. Those proposals were due

no later than March 14, 2014.

At this stage, we would normally ask for your preferences for various air camers and service

options. However, in response to the Department's request for proposals, Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., the

incumbent, was the only air carrier to submit a proposal. Nonetheless, we want to give you an opportunity to

submit any final comments for the record that you may have. A copy of that proposal is attached to this letter

and may also be accessed online via the Federal Docket Management System at:

http;//www.regulations.gov/#! searchResults;rpp=25 ;po=O;s=DOT -OS T-1997 -2960;fp=true;ns=true

I want to give you an opportunity to submit any formal comments for the record before submitting a

recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We request that you submit

any comments you may have as soon as possible, but in any case no later than April 18, 2014. We will

carefully consider your comments before submitting a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a

decision. If you have any questions or if you find that you need additional time to draft your comments, please

let me know.

Please send your comments to the Department at the following email address; EAS@dot.gov or by fax to 202-

366-7838. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me 202-366-9967.

Sincerely,

Scott Faulk

Transportation Industry Analyst

U.S, Department of Transportation

Office of Aviation Analysis

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

202-366-972 I

1
Fw: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule RobertJ Wayland to: Bill Maxwell 03/15/2011 09:19 PM

Mar8_2011_Handout1.pdf Mar8_2011_Handout2.pdf

Mar8_2011_Handout3.pdf Mar8_2011_Handout4.pdf

Sent from Blackberry Wireless Device
********************************************* Dr. Robert J. Wayland
U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, MC D243-01 RTP, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Fax: (919) 541-5450 Cell: (919) 306-2290

From: "Higgins, Cortney" [Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 03/15/2011 08:57 PM AST To: Robertj Wayland Cc: Charlotte Bertrand; Karen Thundiyil; Thomas Gillis; Mary Johnson Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule

Hi Bob, Consistent with our EO, the handouts from this meeting are attached.

Regards, Cortney

When: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: 10103 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Paul Billings, American Lung Association has requested this meeting.
§ 133.25 Notification of Governor's designee. ( a ) If the Governor of a State anticipates the need to access the Fund under this part, he or she must advise the NPFC in writing of the specific individual who is designated to make requests under this part.
( b ) This designation must include the individual's name, address, telephone number, and title or capacity in which employed.
( c ) The information required by paragraph (b) of this section must be forwarded to the Director National Pollution Funds Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7605, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7605.
[CGD 92-014, 57 FR 53969, Nov. 13, 1992, as amended by USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27440, June 10, 2009; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35081, July 28, 2017]
Order filed September 11, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00355-CV

____________

FATIMA ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A HWY 6 SHAMROCK AND SAEED 

SHAIKH, Appellants

V.

TARA ENERGY, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-CCV-042684

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due August 20, 2014. No brief or motion for extension 

of time has been filed. 

Unless appellants file a brief with this court on or before October 10, 2014, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1404 Apra Harbor, Guam—security zone. ( a ) The following is designated as Security Zone C—The waters of Apra Outer Harbor, Guam surrounding Naval Mooring Buoy No. 702 (Located at 13°27′30.1′′ N and 144°38′12.9′′ E. Based on World Geodetic System 1984 Datum) and the Maritime Prepositioning ships moored thereto. The security zone will extend 100 yards in all directions around the vessel and its mooring. Additionally, a 50 yard security zone will remain in effect in all directions around buoy No. 702 when no vessel is moored thereto.
( b ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.33 of this part, entry into Security Zone C is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, U.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia/Sector Guam.
[COTP Guam Reg. 89-001, 55 FR 18725, May 4, 1990, as amended by USCG-2022-0429, 87 FR 48446, Aug. 9, 2022]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22671-CV-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA, et al

 Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al,

______________Defendants. ________________

NOTICE SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to an Order of Referral for Settlement Conference entered by Chief 

United States District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga (D.E. #34), a settlement 

conference in this matter is scheduled before Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Edwin G. Torres on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.1

The settlement conference shall be attended by all parties and their counsel 

of record. Each side shall have a party representative present with full authority to 

negotiate and finalize any settlement agreement reached.

DONE in Miami, Florida this 31st day of January, 2023.

ANGELA E. NOBLE

CLERK OF COURT

Maedon Clark, Deputy Clerk

1 The settlement conference will be conducted via ZOOM. The parties will receive the 

ZOOM information by email.

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

DONALD J. TRUMP, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

 / 

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

David K. Kessler, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that: 

 The Motion is GRANTED. David K. Kessler may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Amici Curiae. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic 

filings to David K. Kessler at DKessler@paulweiss.com. 

 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 45-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this _____ day of 

_________________, 2022. 

 __________________________ 

 AILEEN M. CANNON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 45-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
Unassociated Document


 

RELEASE


 


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Gilad David, (“David”), for good and valuable consideration, including but not limited to the consummation of a share purchase agreement between David and Marlon Liam in respect to the sale of shares of Net Profits Ten Inc. (“NET PROFITS”), the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, agrees as follows:


 


1. David hereby remises, releases and forever discharges NET PROFITS and its assigns, employees and servants, and, where applicable, the executors, administrators, successors and assigns from any and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, claims, demands and obligations whatsoever, at law or in equity, which David may have had or now have or which her assigns, receivers, receiver-managers, trustees, affiliates, and, where applicable, the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of his hereafter can, shall or may have existing up to the present time by reason of any matter cause or thing whatsoever relating to or arising out of the relationship between the David and NET PROFITS relating to, arising out of or in connection with any and all dealings between the parties to the date hereof.


 


2. Notwithstanding the above provision and for greater clarification, this Release does not apply to any claims that may arise after the date of this Release.


 


3. It is understood and agreed that David shall not commence or continue any claims or proceedings against anyone in respect of anything hereby released which may result in a claim or proceedings against NET PROFITS.  If any such claim or proceeding results in any claim or proceeding against NET PROFITS, then the party bringing such claim or proceeding shall indemnify and save harmless the other party from all resulting liabilities, obligations and costs.


 


4. David hereby represents that he is the only party entitled to the consideration expressed in this Release, and has not assigned any right of action released hereby to any other firm, corporation or person.


 


5. David acknowledges that he has read this document and fully understands the terms of this Release, and acknowledges that this Release has been executed voluntarily after either receiving independent legal advice, or having been advised to obtain independent legal advice and having elected not to do so.


 


6. This Release is governed by the laws of Nevada, and the parties attorn to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Nevada with regard to any dispute arising out of this Release.


 


7. Execution and delivery of this document by fax shall constitute effective execution and delivery. Execution of this document by a corporation shall be effective notwithstanding that its corporate seal is not affixed hereto.







DATED for reference this 28th day of June, 2012.









/s/ Gilad David___________________


Gilad David
Request for Carryover Request

A Carryover is forwarding an unobligated balance of funds from a previous budget period to cover 

allowable costs in the current budget period.  A Carryover must be requested in support of activities

aligned with a grantee’s existing project goals and objectives to cover costs not already incurred by the

recipient. 

A grantee’s request for Carryover approval should be initiated once the actual unobligated balance is 

known (generally during the period allowed for preparation and submission of the Federal Financial

Report (SF‐425)). Grantees must ensure financial reconciliation of financial reports submitted to ACL

and Payment Management System that are accurate and therefore requests should be made for the

exact dollar amount, including cents.

Documents Required 

 A dated cover letter signed by the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) that 

includes:
 

o	 Grant Award Number and Grantee Organization Name 

o	 Written explanation of why the carryover is needed, including the reason for having 

unobligated funds from the prior budget year, the carryover amount, and summary of 

activities that will be completed using the carryover funds.  

 The most recent Federal Financial Report (SF‐425) reflecting the unobligated balance of federal 

funds (line 10h).

 A budget narrative/justification providing a breakdown of how the unobligated federal funds 

will be allocated within each budget category. 

How to Submit Your Request:

All requests for Carryover should be submitted by the grantee in Grants Management Module as a new 

amendment by accessing “Manage Amendments”, click “New”, select “ACL Carryover Request (Type 8)” 

and “Create Amendment”.  

GrantSolutions has a training video showing grantees how to request and manage grant amendments – 

which include no‐cost extension requests.  This video is at the bottom of this page.” 

Version 10.2018
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Charles R. Mollo, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mobility Electronics,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     /s/ Charles R. MolloCharles R. MolloPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 12, 2003
-25-
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 148.722 Should the construction plan incorporate best available technology and recommended industry practices?

Each applicant must submit a proposed construction plan. It must incorporate best available technology and recommended industry practices as directed in § 148.730 of this part.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000001923
<NAME> ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,344,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,641,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (154,377)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,169,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,337,576
<PP&E>                                      83,785,764
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,343,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,646,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,096,457
<BONDS>                                     57,321,687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,014,039
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,601,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,646,638
<SALES>                                    108,332,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           108,655,178
<CGS>                                      101,057,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              101,057,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,924,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,618,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (970,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (344,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (626,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
§ 164.78 Navigation under way: Towing vessels. ( a ) The owner, master, or operator of each vessel towing shall ensure that each person directing and controlling the movement of the vessel— ( 1 ) Understands the arrangement of the tow and the effects of maneuvering on the vessel towing and on the vessel, barge, or object being towed;
( 2 ) Can fix the position of the vessel using installed navigational equipment, aids to navigation, geographic reference-points, and hydrographic contours;
( 3 ) Does not fix the position of the vessel using buoys alone (Buoys are aids to navigation placed in approximate positions either to alert mariners to hazards to navigation or to indicate the orientation of a channel. They may not maintain exact charted positions, because strong or varying currents, heavy seas, ice, and collisions with vessels can move or sink them or set them adrift. Although they may corroborate a position fixed by other means, they cannot fix a position; however, if no other aids are available, buoys alone may establish an estimated position.);
( 4 ) Evaluates the danger of each closing visual or radar contact;
( 5 ) Knows and applies the variation and deviation, where a magnetic compass is fitted and where charts or maps have enough detail to enable this type of correction;
( 6 ) Knows the speed and direction of the current, and the set, drift, and tidal state for the area to be transited;
( 7 ) Proceeds at a safe speed taking into account the weather, visibility, density of traffic, draft of tow, possibility of wake damage, speed and direction of the current, and local speed-limits; and
( 8 ) Monitors the voyage plan required by § 164.80.
( b ) The owner, master, or operator of each vessel towing shall ensure that the tests and inspections required by § 164.80 are conducted and that the results are entered in the log or other record carried on board.
[CGD 94-020, 61 FR 35075, July 3, 1996, as amended by USCG-2000-6931, 68 FR 22610, Apr. 29, 2003; 69 FR 34068, June 18, 2004]
§ 155.480 Overfill devices. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, “oil” has the same definition as provided in § 151.05 of this chapter.
( b ) Each tank vessel with a cargo capacity of 1,000 or more cubic meters (approximately 6,290 barrels), loading oil or oil residue as cargo, must have one overfill device that is permanently installed on each cargo tank and meets the requirements of this section. ( 1 ) On a tankship, each cargo tank must be equipped with an overfill device (including an independent audible alarm or visible indicator for that tank) that meets the requirements for tank overfill alarms under 46 CFR 39.20-7(b)(2) and (3), and (d)(1) through (d)(4).
( 2 ) On a tank barge, each cargo tank must be equipped with an overfill device that— ( i ) Meets the requirements of 46 CFR 39.2007(b)(2) through (b)(4), (d)(1) through (d)(4), and 46 CFR 39.2009(a)(1) ;
( ii ) Is an installed automatic shutdown system that meets the requirements of 46 CFR 39.2009(a)(2); or
( iii ) Is an installed high-level indicating device that meets the requirements of 46 CFR 39.2003(b)(1), (2), and (3).
( c ) Each cargo tank of a U.S. flag tank vessel must have installed on it an overfill device meeting the requirements of this section at the next scheduled cargo tank internal examination performed on the vessel under 46 CFR 31.10-21.
( d ) Each cargo tank of a foreign flag tank vessel must have installed on it an overfill device— ( 1 ) At the first survey that includes dry docking, as required by the vessel's flag administration, to meet the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974, as amended, or the International Load Line Convention of 1966; or
( 2 ) At the first cargo tank internal examination performed on the tank vessel under 46 CFR 31.10-21.
( e ) This section does not apply to a tank vessel that does not meet the double hull requirements of § 157.10d of this chapter and, under 46 U.S.C. 3703a(c), may not operate in the navigable waters or Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States after January 1, 2000.
( f ) This section does not apply to tank vessels that carry asphalt, animal fat, or vegetable oil as their only cargo.
[CGD 90-071a, 59 FR 53290, Oct. 21, 1994, as amended by CGD 90-071a, 62 FR 48773, Sept. 17, 1997; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44282, July 27, 2015; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35082, July 28, 2017]