alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.67 Electrical component ratings.

Electrical components must have current and voltage ratings equal to or greater than the maximum load they may carry.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1051 Lake Washington Ship Canal. ( a ) When fog prevails by day or by night, the drawtender of each bridge listed in this section, after giving the acknowledging signal to open, shall toll a bell continuously during the approach and passage of vessels.
( b ) All non-self-propelled vessels, craft, or rafts navigating this waterway for which the opening of any draw is necessary shall be towed by a suitable self-propelled vessel while passing the draw.
( c ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge, mile 0.1, shall open on signal.
( d ) The draws of the Ballard Bridge, mile 1.1, Fremont Bridge, mile 2.6, and University Bridge, mile 4.3, shall open on signal, except that: ( 1 ) The draws need not be opened for a period of up to 10 minutes after receiving an opening request, if needed to pass accumulated vehicular traffic. However, the draws shall open without delay, when requested by vessels engaged in towing operations.
( 2 ) The draws need not open from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, except all Federal holidays but Columbus Day for any vessel of less than 1000 tons, unless the vessel has in tow a vessel of 1000 gross tons or over.
( 3 ) Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. the draws shall open if at least one hour notice is given by telephone, radiotelephone, or otherwise to the drawtender at the Fremont Avenue Bridge.
( e ) The draw of the Montlake Bridge, mile 5.2, shall open on signal, except that: ( 1 ) The draw need not open for a period of up to 10 minutes after receiving an opening request, if needed to pass accumulated vehicular traffic. However, the draw shall open without delay, when requested by vessels engaged in towing operations.
( 2 ) For any vessel or watercraft of less than 1,000 gross tons, unless the vessel has in tow a vessel of 1,000 gross tons or over, from Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays: ( i ) The draw need not open from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. from April 30 to September 1 and from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. from September 1 to April 30.
( ii ) The draw need open only on the hour and half hour from 12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD 82-025, 49 FR 26722, June 29, 1984; CGD13 84-13, 49 FR 35628, Sept. 11, 1984; CGD13 86-02, 51 FR 18788, May 22, 1986; CGD 13 88-03, 53 FR 10535, April 1, 1988; CGD13 89-06, 54 FR 52798, Dec. 22, 1989; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33664, June 28, 1996; CGD13-99-005, 66 FR 33026, June 20, 2001; CGD13-02-012, 68 FR 53051, Sept. 9, 2003]
#### Jackson Brothers & Watts Company *v.*Gillespie.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided January 17, 1907.

Action on contract. Before Judge Iiodges. City court of Macon. October 12, 1905.

*A. L. Dasher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Roland Ellis*and *Richard Curd,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. The declaration in attachment was not open to general demurrer, it being alleged in said declaration that the plaintiff and the defendant had entered into a contract, under the terms of which the former was to perform the duties of a traveling salesman for the defendant in the territory designated, during the year 1905, and that the defendant was to pay a stipulated amount as a salary for said year, provided the sales aggregated a named sum, and a proportionately less amount if the sales aggregated less, as well as a certain per cent, commission, ^hould the “net amount” of the sales exceed the sum named; and to pay another amount as expenses; and that the plaintiff had faithfully complied with all of his obligations under said contract, and had sold “bills of goods which were shipped by defendant, up to the sum of five thousand dollars,” but that the defendant had, without cause, on the 15th day of April, 1905, discharged the plaintiff, thereby committing a breach of said contract.

2. Assignments of error in the bill of exceptions will be treated as abandoned, where they are not insisted upon in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error.

3. Where the evidence is not set forth in the bill of exceptions, and no approved brief of evidence is either attached to the bill of exceptions as an exhibit or filed and made a part of the record, no decision will be made of questions raised by assignments of error which involve a consideration of the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MONY PREAP; EDUARDO VEGA 

PADILLA; JUAN LOZANO 

MAGDALENO,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting 

Secretary, Department of 

Homeland Security; WILLIAM P.

BARR, Attorney General; 

RICHARD VALEIKA, Field Office 

Director, San Francisco Field 

Office, United States Bureau of 

Immigration and Customs 

Enforcement; MELISSA W.

MAXIM, Field Office Director, 

San Diego Field Office, United 

States Bureau of Immigration 

and Customs Enforcement; 

CORINNA LUNA, Field Office 

Director, Los Angeles Field 

Office, United States Bureau of 

Immigration and Customs 

Enforcement,

Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 14-16326

14-16779

D.C. No.

4:13-cv-05754-YGR

ORDER
2 PREAP V. JOHNSON

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed May 1, 2019

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Jacqueline H. Nguyen,

and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Nielsen v. 

Preap, 139 S. Ct. 954 (2019), the opinion of this Court dated 

August 4, 2016, 831 F.3d 1193, is VACATED and judgment 

is entered REVERSING the district court’s order granting a 

preliminary injunction. We remand this case to the district 

court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme 

Court’s opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Accounting Office

# AGENCY:

General Accounting Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice of appointments. 

# SUMMARY:

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. This notice announces six appointments to fill the vacancies occurring this year.

# DATES:

Appointments are effective May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2003.

# ADDRESSES:

  

GAO:    441 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20548

MedPAC: 1730 K Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

  

GAO:    Molly Ryan, 202/512-3592

MedPAC: Murray N. Ross, Ph.D., 202/653-7220

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

To fill this year's vacancies I am announcing the following MedPAC appointments: 

Autry O.V. “Pete” DeBusk; Glenn M. Hackbarth; Alan R. Nelson; Robert D. Reischauer; David A. Smith; and Ray E. Stowers 

(Sec. 4022, Pub. L. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251, 350)

David M. Walker,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 00-14068 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
VIP.Docs-000089 All VIP 26 A 000026

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 65-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2023 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Michael Tokarz, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal Executive Officer of MVC Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:

 

1.                                     The Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

In the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal Executive Officer for MVC Capital, Inc.

 
| /s/   Michael Tokarz |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| Michael   Tokarz     |   |

 

Date:  1/17/17

 

Scott Schuenke, in the capacity of the officer who performs the functions of Principal Financial Officer, of MVC Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Registrant”), certifies that:

 

1.                                     The Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

In the capacity of the officer who performs the functions

of Principal Financial Officer for

MVC Capital, Inc.

 
| /s/   Scott Schuenke |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| Scott   Schuenke     |   |

 

Date:  1/17/17

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.10 Segregated ballast tanks and crude oil washing systems for certain new vessels. ( a ) This section applies to a new vessel that: ( 1 ) Is constructed under a building contract awarded after June 1, 1979;
( 2 ) In the absence of a building contract, has the keel laid or is at a similar stage of construction after January 1, 1980;
( 3 ) Is delivered after June 1, 1982; or
( 4 ) Has undergone a major conversion for which: ( i ) The contract is awarded after June 1, 1979;
( ii ) In the absence of a contract, conversion is begun after January 1, 1980; or
( iii ) Conversion is completed after June 1, 1982.
( b ) Each tank vessel under this section of 20,000 DWT or more that carries crude oil and of 30,000 DWT or more that carries products must have segregated ballast tanks that have a total capacity to allow the vessel to meet the draft and trim requirements in paragraph (c) of this section without recourse to the use of cargo tanks for water ballast.
( c ) In any ballast condition during any part of a voyage, including that of lightweight with only segregated ballast, each tank vessel under paragraph (b) of this section must have the capability of meeting each of the following: ( 1 ) The molded draft amidship (dm) in meters, without taking into account vessel deformation, must not be less than dm in the following mathematical relationship: dm = 2.0 + 0.02L
( 2 ) The drafts at the forward and after perpendiculars must correspond to those determined by the draft amidship under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, in association with a trim by the stern of no more than 0.015L.
( 3 ) The minimum draft at the after perpendicular is that which is necessary to obtain full immersion of the propeller.
( d ) Segregated ballast tanks required in paragraph (b) of this section, voids, and other spaces that do not carry cargo must be distributed: ( 1 ) For a vessel to which § 157.10d applies, in accordance with § 157.10d(c)(4); or,
( 2 ) For a vessel to which § 157.10d does not apply, in accordance with the procedure contained in appendix C to this part.
( e ) Each tank vessel under this section of 20,000 DWT or more that carries crude oil must have a crude oil washing system that meets the design, equipment, and installation requirements in subpart D of this part.
( f ) Each tank vessel under this section may be designed to carry ballast water in cargo tanks as allowed under § 157.35.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43707, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 90-051, 57 FR 36239, Aug. 12, 1992]
Sanford Center for Aging of the University of Nevada, Reno 

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for addressing behavioral health 

and/or chronic pain among older adults 

and adults with disabilities living in your 

community.

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based selfmanagement education (CDSME) and/or 

self-management support programs to 

empower them to better manage these 

chronic condition(s), while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

The Sanford Center for Aging (SCA) of the 

University of Nevada, Reno and its partners will: 

• Develop a results-based, comprehensive 

strategy for addressing chronic pain;

• Increase the number of people who 

participate in the Chronic Pain SelfManagement Program (CPSMP) and Fit & 

Strong! (F&S); and

• Build a sustainable reimbursement 

mechanism for program delivery to 

address chronic pain among older adults 

and adults with disabilities residing in 

Northern Nevada.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Pain Self-Management Program

• Fit & Strong!

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, SCA will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Prominence Health Plan (PHP)

Anticipated Results

The SCA and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Engage 210 CPSMP participants and 100 

F&S participants; 

• Achieve a 70% participant completion 

rate in CPSMP and 75% participant 

completion rate in F&S;

• Develop a reimbursement plan for PHP 

members who complete CPSMP and F&S;

and

• Embed a referral system in the electronic 

medical record for PHP providers to 

utilize.
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

Contact:

Peter Reed, PhD, MPH

Director, Sanford Center for Aging

psreed@unr.edu

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
Exhibit 

32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay Isco, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: April 24, 2007                                                                         By:/s/Jay Isco                                           

Jay Isco, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6596

PIERRE A. RENOIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 99-6698

PIERRE A. RENOIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 99-6722

PIERRE A. RENOIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,
2

versus

RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-99-211-7)

Submitted: July 13, 1999 Decided: August 30, 1999

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pierre A. Renoir, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Pierre A. Renoir seeks to appeal district court orders denying

his motion to join other plaintiffs in his action filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), denying his motion for appointment of

counsel, and staying the case pending the conclusion of the appeals

of the first two orders. We dismiss all three appeals for lack of

jurisdiction because the orders are interlocutory and not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders appealed here are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory

or collateral orders.

We therefore dismiss the appeals as interlocutory. We further

deny Renoir’s “Petition for Subpoena Duces Tecum” and motion to

consolidate Appeal No. 99-6863 with these appeals, and deny as moot

his motion to consolidate Appeals Nos. 99-6698 and 99-6722 with 99-

6596. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Argued and submitted May 20,

judgment of spousal support modified; otherwise affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal October 14, 1992

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Kathleen M. PORTER, *Respondent - Cross-Appellant, and*Timothy J. PORTER, *Appellant - Cross-Respondent.*

(DO89-1467; CA A67344)

839 P2d 275

James C. Farrell, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant - cross-respondent.

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for respondent - cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*584PER CURIAM

Husband appeals and wife cross-appeals from a judgment of dissolution. On the assignments of error regarding the disposition of property, we affirm without discussion. We write briefly to discuss the duration of the spousal support award and to modify the judgment to make the award indefinite.

The trial court awarded wife monthly spousal support of $3,000 for one year, $2,500 for three years, $2,000 for three years, $1,500 for three years and $1,000 for five years. It declined to make the last amount indefinite, because the parties will be near retirement when the temporary support award expires, and it said that then would be an appropriate time to terminate spousal support. In the light of the parties’ great disparity in income and because it is unlikely that wife will ever earn enough to be able to enjoy a standard of living not overly disproportionate to that enjoyed during the marriage, indefinite spousal support should be awarded. The likelihood of eventual retirement is no reason to limit the duration of support now. *See Franzke v. Franzke,*292 Or 110, 120-22, 637 P2d 595 (1981).

Judgment modified to make the final $1,000 a month spousal support award permanent; otherwise affirmed on appeal and a cross-appeal. Costs to wife.
VIP.Docs-000033

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 75-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2023 Page 1 of 3
VIP.Docs-000034

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 75-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2023 Page 2 of 3
VIP.Docs-000036

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 75-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2023 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of StereoVision Vision
Entertainment, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Theodore Botts, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/S/ Theodore Botts
Theodore Botts
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


September 27, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Hinkle *v.*Smith & Son.

Beck, J.

1. The oldest item in the account sued on was of a date less than five years anterior to the filing of the suit; and the creditor being under an inhibition to institute his action again&t the administrator until after the expiration of twelve months from the date of the administra- . tor’s appointment, the statute was tolled for that period, and no item of the account was barred by the statute of limitations.

'2. After both parties had concluded the introduction of testimony, and argument had been entered upon, it was not error for the court to disallow an amendment setting up the defense that the account sued on was barred by the statute of limitations, no evidence having been introduced that would have authorized a finding in favor of the defendant upon such plea.

.'3. Evidence having been introduced showing that the plaintiffs kept correct books of account, and it appearing that the entries offered as evidence were made by a member of the plaintiffs’ firm, it was not error for the court to allow the introduction of the books in evidence, even though it may not have been shown that the merchant kept no clerk. *McDaniel*v. *Truluok,*27 *Ga.*366.

4. The overruling of defendant’s objection to the introduction in evidence of the ledger kept by the plaintiffs’ firm, if error, was harmless, as the entries therein only tended to prove facts already established by other uncontradicted evidence.

*5.*Grounds of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of evidence, should state what objection was made to the evidence, and . that it was insisted upon at the time of the introduction of the evidence; otherwise an exception to the overruling of such grounds is without merit.

*438Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided February 14, 1907.

Complaint. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court. October *27,*1905.

*Malcolm D. J ones*and *L. J. Blaloclc,*for plaintiff in error.

*Allen Fort & Sons,*contra.

6. Tlie evidence demanded the verdict, and the court properly overruled the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*