alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1102 Security Zone; Naval Base Point Loma; San Diego Bay, CA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: The water adjacent to the Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, CA, enclosed by the following coordinates: 32°42′28.8′′ N, 117°14′13.2′′ W (Point A) 32°42′28.8′′ N, 117°14′12.6′′ W (Point B) 32°42′10.2′′ N, 117°14′03.0′′ W (Point C) 32°42′06.2′′ N, 117°14′01.5′′ W (Point D) 32°41′49.5′′ N, 117°14′07.0′′ W (Point E) 32°41′47.4′′ N, 117°14′11.4′′ W (Point F) 32°41′43.8′′ N, 117°14′12.6′′ W (Point G) 32°41′31.8′′ N, 117°14′13.8′′ W (Point H) 32°41′33.0′′ N, 117°14′01.2′′ W (Point I) 32°41′10.2′′ N, 117°13′57.0′′ W (Point J) 32°41′10.2′′ N, 117°13′58.2′′ W (Point K) Thence running generally north along the shoreline to Point A.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) The general regulations governing security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33 apply to the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) Entry into, or remaining in, the areas of either zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port San Diego; Commanding Officer, Naval Base Point Loma; or Commander, Naval Region Southwest.
( 3 ) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone may request permission from the Captain of the Port San Diego at telephone number (619) 278-7033 or on VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz) or from either the Commanding Officer, Naval Base Point Loma or the Commanding Officer Navy Region Southwest by calling the Navy Port Operation Dispatch at telephone number (619) 556-1433 or on VHF-FM channels 16 or 12. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port San Diego or his or her designated representative.
( c ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: Captain of the Port San Diego, means the Commanding Officer of the Coast Guard Sector San Diego; Commander, Navy Region Southwest, means Navy Region Commander responsible for the Southwest Region; Commanding Officer, Naval Base Point Loma, means the Installation Commander of the naval base located on Point Loma, San Diego, California; Designated Representative, means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port San Diego to assist in the enforcement of the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) *Enforcement.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section by the U.S. Navy and local law enforcement agencies.
[USCG-2013-0580, 78 FR 72027, Dec. 2, 2013]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Epixtar Corp.

We hereby consent to the use by Epixtar Corp. in the Annual Report on Form 10KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of our report dated March 11, 2003
except to Note 2, which is dated April 5, 2004, relating to the financial
statements of Epixtar Corp.

                                   /s/ Liebman, Goldberg & Drogin LLP
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Liebman, Goldberg & Drogin LLP
                                   Certified Public Accountants


Garden City, NY
April 13, 2004
OMB Control No. 0985-0039

Exp. Date 01/31/2018

**[Program Name] Attendance Log**

Start Date: _ _/_ _/_ _ _ _  End Date: _ _/_ _/ _ _ _ _

**Sessions Attended***

**Adapt this section to include the number of possible sessions. Use additional pages if needed*
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0985-0039. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: Administration for Community Living, 330 C Street SW, Washington DC 20201, Attention: PRA Reports Clearance Officer
**EXHIBIT 10(c)1**

 

 

**Georgia Power Company has requested confidential treatment for certain portions of this document pursuant to an application for confidential treatment sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Georgia Power Company has omitted such portions from this filing and filed them separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such omissions are designated as "[***]."**

 

 

 

**ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION**

**AGREEMENT**

 

**BETWEEN**

 

**GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, FOR ITSELF AND AS AGENT FOR OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION (AN ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION), MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AUTHORITY OF GEORGIA AND THE CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF WATER, LIGHT AND SINKING FUND COMMISSIONERS, AS OWNERS**

 

**AND**

 

**A CONSORTIUM CONSISTING OF WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY LLC AND STONE & WEBSTER, INC., AS CONTRACTOR**

 

**FOR**

**UNITS 3 & 4 AT THE VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT SITE**

**IN WAYNESBORO, GEORGIA**

 

**DATED AS OF APRIL 8, 2008**

 

 

 

----
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT ON AGING

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

1 of 2

Goals

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for addressing behavioral health 

and/or chronic pain among older adults 

and adults with disabilities living in your 

community.

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based selfmanagement education and/or selfmanagement support programs to 

empower them to better manage these 

chronic condition(s), while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

Strategies and Activities

The Pennsylvania Department on Aging (PDA)

and its partners will: 

• Engage 2,190 socially isolated older 

adults in the evidence-based depression 

intervention program, Healthy IDEAS, in 

Pennsylvania.

• Develop partnerships between area 

agencies on aging (AAA) and local mental 

health organizations. 

• Train 135 AAA staff and 52 mental health 

staff.

• Create a standardized suicide 

intervention protocol for all 52 AAA’s in 

the state.

• Pursue sustainability of the program 

through its integration into the AAAs’ 

existing aging services and establish a 

cost benefit to potential payors.

Proposed Interventions

• Healthy IDEAS (Identifying Depression 

Empowering Activities for Seniors)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, PDA will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Dering Consulting, Inc.

• Elder Services of the Merrimack Valley

• Pennsylvania Association of Area 

Agencies on Aging

• Pennsylvania Council on Aging

• Pennsylvania Department of Human 

Services, Office of Mental Health and 

Substance Abuse Services

• Pennsylvania’s 52 AAAs
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Anticipated Results

The PDA and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Engage 2,190 participants in Healthy 

IDEAS.

• Achieve an 85% participant completion 

rate in Healthy IDEAS. 

• Expand access to community-based 

mental health services.

• Decrease depression symptoms in 75% of 

participants.

• Refer 548 participants to community 

mental health services. 

Contact:

Katrina Kyle

Pennsylvania Department of Aging

katkyle@pa.gov

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
### FILED April 16, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

CHARLES BUFORD BURNS, ) ) BRADLEY CHANCERY Plaintiff/Appellee ) ) NO. 03A01-9806-C H-00190 v. ) ) HON. FRANK V. WIL LIAMS, III BARBARA SPANGLER BURN S, ) CHANCELLOR ) )



### J U D G M E N T This appeal came on to be heard upon the record of the Chancery Court of Bradley Cou

nty and briefs f

iled on behalf of the respective parties. Upon consideration there

of, this Court is of t

he opinion that there i s no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgm

ent. It is therefore O

RDERED and A

DJUDGED by

this court that the judgment of the

trial court is aff

irmed. Costs a

re assessed to the a

ppellant and its surety. T

he case is rem

anded to the Chancer

y Court of Brad

ley County f

or further action in a

ccordance with this opinion and for colle ction of costs pursua nt to ap plicab le law, f or whic h execu tion may i ssue if necess ary.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.152 Person in charge of COW operations. The owner, operator, and master of a tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) shall ensure that the person designated as the person in charge of COW operations— ( a ) Knows the contents in the *Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual* approved by the Coast Guard under § 157.112 or by the government of the vessel's flag state;
( b ) On at least two occasions, has participated in crude oil washing of cargo tanks, one of those occasions occurring on: ( 1 ) The tank vessel on which the person assumes duties as the person in charge of COW operations; or
( 2 ) A tank vessel that is similar in tank design and which has COW equipment similar to that used on the tank vessel on which the person assumes duties as the person in charge of COW operations; and
( c ) Has one year or more of tank vessel duty that includes oil cargo discharge operations and: ( 1 ) Crude oil washing of cargo tanks; or
( 2 ) Has completed a training program in crude oil washing operations that is approved by the Coast Guard or the government of the vessel's flag state.
Note:
Standards of a Coast Guard approved training program are to be developed.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43709, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11628, Mar. 22, 1985]
Exhibit 10.2

                      Amwest Imaging Inc. /Emarket Team LLC
                             Joint Venture Overview

The eMarketTeam  alliance was put in motion to allow Amwest to increase customer
service to MRW (MyRestaurantWeb)  clients,  increase our sales as well as reduce
operating costs.  eMarketTeam agreed to conditionally provide us with supporting
operations  in sales,  support,  technical,  and designers to assist MRW clients
with their growing needs.  MRW no longer has to handle  billing,  technical,  or
design support calls which gives us considerable cost savings.  In addition they
are  providing  valuable  insight to marketing  methods and  information  we can
replicate within MRW to better generate sales and reach potential clients.

Based on potential agreements we are negotiating with eMarketTeam we predict the
market could yield us 10,000 customers using the MRW platform.  With our current
pricing structure at $99/month it's possible to build $12m in recurring revenues
over a 12 month period.

One of the  pending  deals with  eMarketTeam  is being  allowed the use of their
exclusive B2B Internet Lead technology which they informed us could generate our
sales team up to 500 leads per day to be followed and closed. Securing this deal
would make our estimates very achievable.  The limitations to our figures are if
eMarketTeam  cancels the alliance or other  technology makes the platform or CMS
obsolete during this time.
# A-10 Other Acts
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Somattie Surujnarine, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Farmington Casualty Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Korsunskiy Legal Group, P.C. (Henry R. Guindi, Esq.), for appellant.Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Gina Spiteri, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Reginald A. Boddie, J.), entered September 8, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's sole contention, the proof submitted by defendant was sufficient to demonstrate that plaintiff had failed to appear for the EUOs (<i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720 [2006]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 16, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, James H. Morgan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ James H. MorganJames
      H. MorganChief
      Executive Officer


Date: June 30, 2010




This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and will be retained by Krispy
Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




---
EXHIBIT 

31.1 

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, George Lefevre, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report; and 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

 

 

Dated:		December 2, 2005                            By:  /s/		George Lefevre                               

                                                                             George Lefevre CEO
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

I, David M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and all other reports containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered
by this annual report, of Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC;

2. To the best of my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
period covered by this annual report;

3. To the best of my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by
the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement is included in these reports; and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities
performed by the servicer under the transition property servicing agreement and based upon the review required under the transition property servicing agreement the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the transition property servicing
agreement.

Date: March 31, 2008



/s/ David M. Davis(David M. Davis, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC)
#### Mays *v.*Harkness.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 17, 1906.

Motion to vacate judgment. Before Judge Reagan.’ Butts superior court. August 25, 1905.

*Ray & Ray*and *H. M. Fletcher,*for plaintiff.

X/umpkin, J.

A rule nisi having been granted to foreclose a mortgage, and at the first term no answer having been filed, the ease was taken out of its order and a rule absolute granted. At a later day during the term, the defendant moved to reinstate the ease and to be allowed to file a defense, showing that she had a meritorious defense which she tendered for filing, that the case had been placed on the calendar for trial, and the defense would have been filed in due time before it was reached had it not been for the fact that it was taken up in advance of the regular order. *Held,*that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court in reinstating the case and permitting the defense to be filed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Holder *v.*The State.

.Evans, J.

1. In an indictment under the Penal Code, § 729, which provides a punishment for willful and malicious mischief in injuring or destroying public or private property, it is unnecessary to allege either that the owner of the property injured suffered loss or damage, or that the property was of any stated value. *Harris*v. *State,*73 *Ga.*41.

*52Submitted November 19,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Certiorari. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. September *24,*1906.

*B. F. & G. Y. Harrell,*for plaintiff in error,

*F. A. Hooper, solicitor-general,*contra.

2. In a prosecution for malicious mischief the ownership of the property injured or destroyed must he proved as charged; though if the injured property he attached to realty, ownership will he inferred from proof of possession or occupancy of the alleged owner. *Grant*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*200-201. But proof of title to property attached to realty, where no possession is shown, can not be made by the oral statement of the prosecuting witness that he was the owner of the property injured. *Bleckley*v. *White,*98 *Ga.*594. A parol statement by a witness that a fence permanently attached to realty was “the property” of a named person should have been excluded on objection.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# ToC

B-10 Complaints for Non-Institutional Settings by State

B-10 Complaints for Non-Institutional Settings by Region

# B-10 Other Comp by State

Table of Contents

# B-10 Other Comp by Region

Table of Contents