alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Zod

Zn

ana

Nor

OA

nad

NoA

R6W R5W R4W R3W R2W
|
zl
B/S
3|8
T a T
alc
5 9|2 5
N gis N
qi2
Sal 3/8
allem '
District I Vernonia
+—
+
T 4
4 N
OREGON N
COLUMBIA _GOUNTY_|___
RuWw RA10W ROW R8W |. _CLATSOP_COUNTY 7 NST nn ~~" WASHINGTON COUNTY a. ve
TILLAMOOK COUNTY | Scappoose
1
Oo
! T
L-_-_ 3
| N
g | COLUMBIA CO.
Manzanita fiultNoMan [ee]
TILLAMOOK COUNTY |
1
\__nehalem |
Co 1
1
1
i |,
| 2
N
1
@ L-—
ie |
Rockaway Beach LE “— |
© North Plain H
North Plains
Garibaldi 1 T
1
1 6 N
Tillamook

Bay

ro Forest L Hillsboro
| Grove Cornelius 7

4 Hagg
Lake
wilson T
’ Ss
2
Barney
Tillamook Reservoir @
Trask qualatin
U a = = ee re

| WASHINGTON COUNTY.

ona

R3W

Yamhill

Source: Bureau of Land Management corporate data
‘modified for Western Oregon Plan Revisions analysis.
Additional data were compiled from various sources. No
warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management
as to the aocuracy, reliability, or completeness of these
data for individual or aggregate use with other data.

‘ENT OF
AM 7
KEE
Ly

‘US. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

\—~ £7

Sand Lake

ncn.

McMinnville

YAMHILL COUNTY

OA

eR Yr HY
4 ant ; ; ; ; Miles ; ; ; ;
® wy 3 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Et 1 E [ I 1 E I I 1 ]
; Kilometers
+
3 8 abers Equal Area Projection,
Amity orth American Datum of
Sheridan B (53)
ay AABN
Willamina goull

i” (8 i _— 1 T
SALEM DISTRICT YAMHILL COUNTY 6

i EUGENE DISTRICT POLK COUNTY Ss

R11W R10W ROW R8WwW R7W R6W R5W R4W
Legend
6 MAP 3A
Salem District
21 Land Tenure Zone 3 Identifier Visual Resource Management Area
See Appendix F Wiss 3 Resource Management Plan
ass 2008
Land Tenure Zone 3 Location* .
Class 4 Tillamook Resource Area

*not all parcels displayed
Land Tenure Zone 3 Locations
and
Visual Resource Management Classes

M08-09-01
nad

No>A

OnA

Nor

nNoa54

10

Legend

Existing Wild and Scenic
River

Recreational

Scenic

Wild

Land Use Allocations

National Land Conservation
System

Administratively Withdrawn

Late-Successional Management
Area

ona

R3E

R4E

R5E R6E

R7E

Damascus

Reservoir

WATERSHED

MULTNOMAH COUNTY i

CLACKAMAS COUNTY

MANAGEMENT

+
Troutdalet | ‘
N

oer :

esau Bull Run BULL RUN §

ona

nor

asa

nas

No54

10

Suitable or Eligible Wild Riparian Management Area
and Scenic River ; .
Deferred Timber Management Oregon( City & a}
Co) Recreational Area a
. ; T ©
Cc.) Scenic Timber Management Area 3 a :
Ss
a >=
- 3
|
wy
_-
i i
T a
4 ~
s y 8
L bs
g
Kee,
R3W R2W o Ff
(219)
29 y»
ais —~_— of Molalla
COUNTY
TILLAMOOK
RESOURCE AREA
Gervais
219
oe “ie
mF,
“3 ~,
a rein Sats
> ;
Scotts Mills ~~. A
ae
" Hi 2 pa
Silverton ‘ a & @
Ne = ranen
L As
y FY
q >
9 7
Salem w
ae Salem
S District
> = J. —__ - —-
: T
YN re
Ss
fey,
Ture Aumsville s
go
9 Sublimity a | ae O R E G O N
Stayton
T N
: ae
<0) 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
lt ————— — — — — ]
ot les
Se, . > S 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
%, |
ad ? Kilometers
Jefferson -
~ cs 4) Albers Equal Area Projection
= North American Datum of 1983
Ss
Millersburg c Detrosi
2 as tothe accuracy, Tela, or completeness ofthese
data for individual or aggregate use. wih other data
‘A ENE,
A, Albany i
{60} =)
T
1
Ss
\ MAP 1C
64
Salem District
Resource Management Plan
9 Cascades Resource Area
Sodaville
Land Use Allocations
Gteen Peter Lake ® and
+
i Wild and Scenic Rivers
= &
Sq Foster Lake
D a
R3W R2W Riw R1E R2E R3E R4E

M08-09-01
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Burke W. Whitman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Burke W. Whitman   
|-----------------------
|Burke W. Whitman       
|Chief Financial Officer



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:22-CV-61553-DIMITROULEAS/HUNT

CRUZ VALDIVIESO FIGUERA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALL VIP CARE INC. AND

LIZ VELAZQUEZ MCKINNON

Defendants.

______________________________/

NOTICE OF STRIKING PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT – ECF NO. 85

(COUNTS III AND IV OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT)

Plaintiff, Cruz Valdivieso Figuera, notices the Court and all parties of the striking of her 

Proposal for Settlement to Defendant, All VIP Care Inc., as directed to Counts III and IV of the 

Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 22], as having been filed in error.

Dated this 14th day of September 2023.

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 502.16 Sanctions and remedies—General. Whenever the Secretary believes that the H-2A provisions of the INA or these regulations have been violated such action shall be taken and such proceedings instituted as deemed appropriate, including (but not limited to) the following: ( a ) Institute appropriate administrative proceedings, including: The recovery of unpaid wages, including wages owed to U.S. workers as a result of a layoff or displacement prohibited by these rules (either directly from the employer, a successor in interest, or in the case of an H-2ALC also by claim against any surety who issued a bond to the H-2ALC); the enforcement of covered provisions of the work contract as set forth in 29 CFR 501.10(a); the assessment of a civil money penalty; reinstatement; or the recommendation of debarment for up to 3 years.
( b ) Petition any appropriate District Court of the U.S. for temporary or permanent injunctive relief, including the withholding of unpaid wages and/or reinstatement, to restrain violation of the H-2A provisions of the INA, 20 CFR part 655, Subpart B, or these regulations by any person.
( c ) Petition any appropriate District Court of the U.S. for specific performance of covered contractual obligations.
#### § 125.11 Form of Coast Guard Port Security Card.

The Coast Guard Port Security Card issued by the Coast Guard under the provisions of this subchapter shall be a laminated card bearing photograph, signature, fingerprint, and personal description of the holder, and other pertinent data.
#### § 151.75 Grinders or comminuters.

Each grinder or comminuter used to discharge garbage in accordance with § 151.69(b)(1), § 151.71(b)(2), or § 151.73(b)(1), must be capable of processing garbage so that it passes through a screen with openings no greater than 25 millimeters (one inch).

[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18405, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by USCG-2012-1049, 78 FR 13493, Feb. 28, 2013]
#### Irvin, administrator, *v.*Callaway.

■Pish, C. J.

This case, upon its facts, is controlled by the decision this day rendered in the case of *Irvin*v. *Spratlin,*ante, and the judgment of the trial court is therefore *Reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Strafford

No. 7547

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Stephen J. Robinson

June 7, 1977

*David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Anne E. Cagwin,*of Concord, attorney, for the state of New Hampshire, filed no brief.

*Falardeau & Mahan,*of Tilton *{Mr. Richard W. Mahan*orally), for the defendant.

Bois, J.

Action on a petition to vacate an order that defendant is a habitual offender and a petition to set aside defendant’s conviction for operating a motor vehicle after being decreed to be a habitual offender.

On December 20, 1973, the Superior Court *{Mullavey,*J.) found Robinson to be a “habitual offender” under the motor vehicle laws. RSA 262-B:l *et seq.*(Supp. 1975). On July 4, 1974, the defendant was arrested and charged with operating a motor vehicle after having been found to be a habitual offender. RSA 262-B:7 (Supp. 1975). A conviction was obtained, and defendant was sentenced to a mandatory prison term.

In this collateral attack the defendant claims that the prior motor vehicle convictions on which the habitual offender finding was based are constitutionally defective. The state joined Mr. Robinson in his request for relief. Notwithstanding this concession, the court denied relief and defendant’s exceptions have been reserved and transferred *by.Mullavey,*J.

Under the statute, habituality is shown by “[tjhree or more convictions, singularly or in combination,” of certain enumerated *497offenses. RSA 262-B:2 (Supp. 1975). The state had relied on four convictions appearing on a “certified abstract” of defendant’s motor vehicle conviction record. Two of the convictions resulted from driving-while-under-the-influence charges to which he had pleaded not guilty; the other two convictions stemmed from pleas of guilty and “nolo” to charges of driving after license revocation and failing to report an accident respectively. All offenses except driving after license revocation were then punishable by imprisonment.

Defendant alleges that, in fact, he “was not represented by counsel in any of the aforesaid hearings, nor was he then aware of his rights to be, nor was he aware of his various constitutional rights at the time he entered his pleas . . . nor was he aware of the consequences of those pleas.. ..”

Defendant’s allegations squarely put in issue the validity of the convictions used in the habitual offender proceedings. *See State v. Maxwell,*115 N.H. 363, 341 A.2d 766 (1975); *State v. Clough,*115 N.H. 7, 332 A.2d 386 (1975). The state has conceded the merits of those allegations by joining in the request for the relief sought. *See State v. Maxwell,*115 N.H. at 365, 341 A.2d at 767; *State v. Clough,*115 N.H. at 11, 332 A.2d at 389. We must conclude that the habitual offender decree lacks sufficient supporting convictions.

The relief prayed for must be granted and the habitual offender decree and the subsequent conviction for its violation must be vacated.

*Exceptions sustained.*

All concurred.
Argued and submitted May 13,

affirmed December 23, 1992

#### David PLATT, D.C., *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, *Respondent.*

(CA A71844)

843 P2d 1024

Brian R. Barnes, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Horton & Koenig, Eugene.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Noren v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners,*117 Or App 337, 843 P2d 1021 (1992).
Event Planning Tips

• Plan: Start planning early and set clear

goals. Identify people who can help, including

volunteers and vendors. Communicate

regularly with your planning team and track

major decisions. Select your event date and

time early in the planning process.

• Partner: Join forces with others in your

community who can provide in-kind services,

volunteers, or materials. They may also have

connections to speakers or entertainers. Local

businesses may agree to exchange publicity

for gift cards, which work well for prizes.

Partners can also amplify your activities online.

• Promote: Develop a publicity plan to promote

your event. Use traditional strategies, like

newspaper ads and community board flyers,

as well as newer media—your website, blog,

and/or social media accounts. You might also

consider contacting a local reporter.

Conduct registration online via any of the free

options available. Email is an effective way

to get people to register, so if you have an

existing email distribution list, use it. Virtual

invitations can make your email stand out.

• Produce virtually: Choose a platform that

fits your budget. Free or low-cost options

may work for smaller events. Make sure the

platform is accessible for participants and

includes any special features you need (e.g.,

recording, whiteboard, breakout rooms).

Conduct a dry run well in advance to refine

logistics and troubleshoot technical issues.

Remember, attention spans are shorter 

online. Aim for an hour-long event and include 

breaks if it will be longer. Assign at least one 

moderator to answer questions, engage 

participants, and keep time. Interact as much 

as possible, engaging people with games, 

polls, and/or Q&A segments. 

• Produce in person: Use a space large

enough to allow for social distancing. Make

sure it is easy for everyone to access. Bring

ample supplies such as hand sanitizer,

disinfecting wipes, and disposable masks. If

you plan to take pictures of your event, bring

photo release forms. Print name tags and ask

coordinators and volunteers to wear matching

shirts or dress in the same color.

Follow all state and local health guidelines. 

Check your state health department for 

safety information. Read the latest CDC 

guidance on events and gatherings. 

• Publish: Post a summary of the event on your

website and highlight key aspects on social

media. Make sure to tag the accounts of any

partners who helped you. Include photos or

graphics to gain traction for your posts.

If possible, gather feedback on what

participants liked/disliked during this phase. If

you have any future activities planned, use this

opportunity to promote the next event.

OLDER

AMERICANS

MONTH

COMMUNITIES OF STRENGTH: MAY 2021

ACL.gov
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 
 CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN
REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN 
 SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Amendment #4 to 
 To the Distributor Agreement between 
 Avnet, Inc. and Aruba
Networks, Inc. 
 This is Amendment #4 (“Amendment #4”) effective February 17, 2012, to the Distributor Agreement (the
“Agreement”) effective June 15, 2007, between Avnet, Inc. (“Avnet”) and Aruba Networks, Inc. (“Aruba”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement. 
 RECITALS 
 A. Under Amendment 1 (“Amendment 1”), effective February 19, 2009, Aruba and Avnet amended the Agreement to add limited price protection (“Limited Price Protection”) for a [***]
period, in accordance with the terms contained therein. 
 B. Aruba and Avnet now desire to amend the Agreement to extend the
Limited Price Protection for an additional period. 
 C. In accordance with Section 14.11 of the Agreement, any term of the
Agreement may be amended only with the written consent of both parties. 
 The parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

	1.	The Limited Price Protection is hereby extended and shall expire on [***]. 


 

	2.	This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.


  

	3.	Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Aruba and Avnet have each caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative, as of the day and year first
above written. 
  

							
	AVNET, INC.	  	ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.
				
	By:	  	 /s/ Scott Look
	  	By:	  	 /s/ Joshua Cash

				
	Print Name:	  	 Scott Look
	  	Print Name:	  	 Joshua Cash

				
	Title:	  	 VP and General Manager, TIS
	  	Title:	  	 Commercial Counsel

				
	Date:	  	 2/23/12
	  	Date:	  	 2/28/2012

				
		  		  		  	 Aruba Networks, Inc.
 1344
Crossman Ave.
 Sunnyvale, CA 94089


  

	***	Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with
respect to the omitted portions.
#### Alice Saguid, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Renee L. Saguid, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Kingston Hospital et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 20, 1996;

decided May 2, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal by appellant Alice Saguid dismissed upon the ground that as to her the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal by appellant Stephen Saguid denied. Motion by appellants for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36130-36131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-408-012]


Trailblazer Pipeline Company; Notice of Filing of Refund Report

June 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 26, 2000, Trailblazer Pipeline Company 
(Trailblazer) filed a refund report in Docket No. RP97-408-000. 
Trailblazer states that the filing and refunds were made to comply with 
the Commission's Orders of April 3, 1999 and March 30, 2000. 
Trailblazer states that these amounts were paid by Trailblazer on April 
28, 2000.
    The refund report summarizes transportation refund amounts for the 
period January 1, 1998 through March 31, 2000 pursuant to Article II of

[[Page 36131]]

Trailblazer's Stipulation and Agreement as approved in the Commission's 
April 3, 1999 Order.
    Trailblazer states that the copies of its filing are being mailed 
to its customers, interested state commissions and all parties set out 
on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. RP97-408.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be on or 
before June 8, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14228 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(dollars in thousands)

 
| ** **                          | ** ** | **Three Months  Ended March 30,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2009**                                         | ** ** | **2008**                                   | ** ** | **2008** | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                           |       |                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                          |       | $                                                | 31,533     |                                       | $          | 23,316 |   | $ | 106,511 |   | $ | 85,303 |   | $ | 66,101 |   | $ | 63,912 |   | $ | 56,742 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |       | 10,776                                           |       | 9,518                                      |       | 40,154 |   | 37,755 |   | 47,020 |   | 46,633 |   | 41,836 |   |
| Adjusted  earnings                  |       | $                                                | 42,309     |                                       | $          | 32,834 |   | $ | 146,665 |   | $ | 123,058 |   | $ | 113,121 |   | $ | 110,545 |   | $ | 98,578 |   |
|                                |       |                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                      |       |                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |       | $                                                | 10,776     |                                       | $          | 9,518 |   | $ | 40,154 |   | $ | 37,755 |   | $ | 47,020 |   | $ | 46,633 |   | $ | 41,836 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges |       | 3.9x                                             |       | 3.4x                                       |       | 3.7x |   | 3.3x |   | 2.4x |   | 2.4x |   | 2.4x |   |

 

----