alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________
No. 96-40494 Summary Calendar

__________________

KENNETH H. JUST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC.; RAMIRO ALANIZ; FRED HARRIS; J.R. MAYO; CHARLES FRED HILLJE; DARELL LASSIG; ROBERT LEO; JAMES MANN; MARGIE POLLOCK; OTTO WAGNER; GEORGE BENNACK, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Associate General Manager For Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc.; DAVID HOLLSCHER, In their Official Capacity as Board of Directors for Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

______________________________________________

September 19, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Kenneth H. Ju st appeals only from the summary

judgment of the distri ct court which dismissed his civil rights

claims brought under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although Valley2

Telephone Cooperative, Inc. is subject to some state regu lation,

the private act complained of (termination without notice) was not

shown to be caused or aided by governmental involvement nor was any

fact issue as to governmental involvement raised by any summary
judgment proof. Because no nexus was shown between the state and

the complained of action, the district court correctly concluded

that there was no action under co lor of state law that would

support an action unde r 42 U.S.C. § 1983. S ee Jackson v.
Metropolitan Edison Company , 419 U.S. 345, 95 S .Ct. 449 (1974);

Just v. Telephone Cooperative Inc. et al. , No. B-94-296 (S.D.Tex.

April 9, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Lenco Mobile Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.









Dated: April 15, 2010
/s/    MICHAEL LEVINSOHNMichael Levinsohn, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: April 15, 2010
/s/    THOMAS BANKSThomas Banks, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 94.400 What are my responsibilities as a(n) Department of Labor awarding official? As a(n) Department of Labor awarding official, you must obtain each recipient's agreement, as a condition of the award, to comply with the requirements in— ( a ) Subpart B of this part, if the recipient is not an individual; or
( b ) Subpart C of this part, if the recipient is an individual.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6235

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAAD SUBHI BASHA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cr-00059-FDW-1; 3:18-cv00281-FDW)

Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Saad Subhi Basha, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Saad Subhi Basha seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Basha has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages of Women in 13 States

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth. 						*Wages of Women in 13 States : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 85*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5393,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
Alexanders, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. May 6, 2004
    
    /s/ Joseph MacnowName:
    
    Joseph MacnowTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Company *v.*Anderson.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided February 14, 1907.

Lumpkin, J.

Evidence that a named person, “manager for the plaintiff” (a corporation), owed the defendant a specified amount, for which such defendant set up a counter-claim by plea, of set-off, did not prove an in-' debtedness by the corporation or authorize a verdict to be directed ■ against it therefor.

*Judgment reversed.*

*■All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*

*572Complaint. Before Judge O’Steen. Douglas superior court. November *23,*1905.

*Lankford & Dickerson,*for plaintiff.
Preventing Pests at Home

Is your family bugged by pests like ants, spiders, 

cockroaches, termites, or mice? You’re not alone. 

You can effectively control or kill pests when you 

take action to starve them out, dry them out, and 

keep them out. Like humans, pests need three 

critical elements to survive: food, water, and shelter. 

By following three simple and effective steps, you 

can protect your family’s health and safety while 

controlling annoying pests.

Starve Them Out!

Pests will eat just about anything, but they might leave 

you alone if they don’t have easy access to food:

• Seal up boxes and bags of food. Roaches love cardboard 

boxes and can climb into these items with ease.

• Store open food in plastic bags or containers, 

such as cereal, flour, or sugar.

• Immediately clean up spills and leftover crumbs. 

Pests love free food left out in the open.

• Don’t walk around the house while eating. Meals and 

snacks should be eaten at a table.

• Clean dirty dishes right away. Pests want whatever is left of 

your meals.

• Keep a tight lid on trash, and empty it often. It may be trash 

to you, but pests see it as dinner. Place trash cans far away 

from a back door entrance.

• Don’t leave pet food out overnight. Food can stir up 

pests’ appetites.

Dry Them Out!

Although roaches can live up to one month without 

food, without water roaches can die in a week’s time:

• Always drain dish water from a sink. Because roaches can 

swim, a sink full of water might become the site of a roach 

pool party.

• Wipe water and other spilled liquids off the counter as soon 

as you first see it. Puddles are roach magnets.

• Fix or report leaky faucets, radiators, dishwashers, and 

washing machines to a building manager.

• Empty excess water in flower pots and plant stands. A drop 

of water can be all a roach needs to feel satisfied.

Keep Them Out!

By keeping roaches and rodents out of your home, 

you can prevent them from ever becoming a 

problem. Rodents spend most of their lives hiding. 

They love cracks, and can squeeze just about 

anywhere. Think smart, and they can’t move in on you:

• Seal cracks and openings along baseboards, behind sinks, 

and around pipes and windows.

• Repair holes in door and window screens to prevent insects 

and other pests from entering a home.

• Check boxes and bags for roaches before bringing them 

into a home.

• Clean up clutter, including stacks of newspapers, paper 

bags, and cardboard boxes. These make good hiding 

places for pests.

• Set traps to control rats and mice. If you use baits, make 

sure they are in a tamper-resistant bait station made of 

durable plastic or metal, and place in an area where 

children and pets cannot touch them.

For more information on pesticides or pesticide 

poisoning prevention, refer to EPA’s Pesticides 

Program Web site at www.epa.gov/pesticides, 

or call the National Pesticide Information Center 

at 1-800-858-7378.

EPA 735-F-07-002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
balance sheet and statement of operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,594
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,149
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,835
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    131,647
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        584,110
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 762,741
<DEPOSITS>                                     618,288
<SHORT-TERM>                                    58,922
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,401
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 762,741
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,366
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,462
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                11,433
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,971
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,420
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,706
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,265
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   23,525
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,964
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,774
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,774
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.63
<LOANS-NON>                                         96
<LOANS-PAST>                                       128
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,633
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      407
<RECOVERIES>                                       115
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,081
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,081
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,368



</TABLE>
§ 136.217 Compensation allowable. ( a ) The amount of compensation allowable for damaged property is the lesser of— ( 1 ) Actual or estimated net cost of repairs necessary to restore the property to substantially the same condition which existed immediately before the damage;
( 2 ) The difference between value of the property before and after the damage; or
( 3 ) The replacement value.
( b ) Compensation for economic loss resulting from the destruction of real or personal property may be allowed in an amount equal to the reasonable costs actually incurred for use of substitute commercial property or, if substitute commercial property was not reasonably available, in an amount equal to the net economic loss which resulted from not having use of the property. When substitute commercial property was reasonably available, but not used, allowable compensation for loss of use is limited to the cost of the substitute commercial property, or the property lost, whichever is less. Compensation for loss of use of noncommercial property is not allowable.
( c ) Compensation for a claim for loss of profits or impairment of earning capacity under § 136.213(b) is limited to that allowable under § 136.235.
Subsistence Use
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 17, 2016

NO. 03-16-00015-CV

Fifteen-Thousand One-Hundred Ninety-Six Dollars and

Forty-One Cents in United States Currency, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 7, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands the 

case to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellee shall pay all costs related to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of X.S., a Juvenile

No. 06-22-00073-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 5105-

J). Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, 

Chief Justice Morriss and Justice van Cleef

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the juvenile court’s order of transfer.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 14, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Me eting attendees:

[CAMD

-- EPA's Clean Air Markets Division, GE

-- General Electric]

Sam Napolitano [CAMD, Division Director] Michael Cohen [CAMD, Environmental Scientist] Jerry Polacek [GE] Chet Thompson [Crowell & Moring] Matt Hill [Edison International, Manager, Federal Affairs] Jack Campbell [GE Commercial Finance, Director, Environmental Programs] Jerry Eyster [GE Energy Financial Services, Senior Vice President, Investment Strategy] Claudia O'Brien [Latham & W atk ins for Edison Internatio nal] Robert Meyers [Crowell & Moring] Linda Stuntz [Stuntz, Davis & Staffier] Jam es Shapiro [GE] Ky le Mulhall [Gephardt Government Affairs for GE] Erica Bowman [Edison Mission Marketing & Trading]
On April 12, 2011 representatives of General Electric (GE) and Edison International met with representatives of EPA's Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) between 3:00 and 4:30 EST at EPA's 1310 L Street offices. At this meeting GE and Edison International and their representatives went over their comments on the N ODA to the Proposed Transport Rule submitted February 7, 2011. No new comments were submitted.
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.110 Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual for foreign tank vessels: Submission.

If the owner or operator of a foreign tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10a(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) desires a Coast Guard approved *Crude Oil Washing Operations and Equipment Manual* under § 157.112, the owner or operator must submit two copies of a manual that meets § 157.138 to the Commandant (CG-CVC), Attn: Office of Commercial Vessel Compliance, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501.

(Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1625-0036)

[CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11627, 11630, Mar. 22, 1985, as amended by CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25122, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33668, June 28, 1996; USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39210, July 12, 2006; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38438, July 7, 2014]
LincOSTWaS 310 05 36 31 p m SI 0-100825-005 

RON WYOEN 

ORBOOM 

s n oniSEN souRomc e tuuw o 

WMMNOfOKKUIlO 

aoiiiM<esM 

008 IM-lflB(mt 

mnitei) SBtsm Senate 

WASHINGTON. DC 20510-3703 

COMIUnTTSBS: 

ouMMmsoNneBUUEr 

OOWCntECW PttMV MP MWUW. MgQWCffl 

aaeuwmao H nnucuwo s AND FBResre 

•WCHL coMMrrnK ON M« a 

tiuscr ooKwrm ON timuaut a 

cofMmeoNnNAMx 

August 24,2010 

The Hoflorable Ray LaHood 

SeorotRiy ofTrangpoitatioii 

U^ . Departmont of Transpoitation 

1200 New Jersey Ave» SB 

Waehington, DC 20590 

Dear Seeietaiy LaHood, 

I am writing to you today in support of tiie Eugene Aiiport*s ^iplicalion for a Small 

Community Air Servioe Devdopmeot program grant to estabM an tdr senrioe link to San Jose, 

Califbroia. Cunent data suggest San Jose as being die most undenuedt nonstop air servioe 

marieet to pursue. I am told tiie San Jose destination maiket is tiie twelfth top destination of 

passengon using the Bugme Aiiport (BUG). However, BUG is only able to retain 159i of local 

panengBTB wift more than 809^ driving to Poitiand. 

'w-ZJ 

. -j 

-—1 

C 

— ] 

U 

i"V 

on 

o i 

. -, 1 : ^ J 

, v'",-U': ^ 

'-^r,>'' ^ 

•':.:.'.za 

: ^^j) _^'' —1 

r^ri-^n T 

^ • ; "•-(>.'-- ^ 

-^=-1— < 

<j"j 

Funding the BUG proposal may provide an ojqKiitunity to reoapture market share to San 

Jose wUle filling an identified transportation need in ibe community. New nonstop routes have 

also been ahown to stimulate passenger traffic on the new route in addition to building bustneas 

rdationahlps between tin two communities. 

Please give tiie Bugene Aitport's ivplicatiion fbr the Small Community Air Service 

Devdopmont program grant your &ir and fbUconrideration. Ifyou have furtiier questions 

please call Juhie Chada in my Bugene ofGoe at 54I-431>Q229. 

Shwerely, 

RonWyden 

United States Senator 

^ ^ 

MRStS 

roaniMhaRinM eUGMLOIIVMOl 

8 U ANNEX BUUXNO lumsr 

t u n 101 tAOMrae.oit«iiio 

MNwr*iMi 

USCDUnHDUB 

MvKgt misr 

BOOM li t 

MBDIBII&,M«nai 

KTTPi/'/WYDOI.SerMIE.OOV 

niNTIO ON KBOMUO NVM 

iMsMBMBuvion munifCB uiMVHuwiHanawE un w 

sun in MBiQittn n 

UNDkORtnOl
Chicago Housing Authority

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year sustainability

grant are to:

• Significantly increase the number of older 

adults and older adults with disabilities at 

risk for falls who participate in evidencebased community programs to reduce 

falls and falls risks; and

• Implement innovative funding 

arrangements to support the proposed 

programs, while embedding the 

programs into an integrated, sustainable 

program network. 

The Chicago Housing Authority and its partners 

will: 

• Engage 300 individuals to enroll in the Fit

& Strong! program across 30 buildings;

• Ensure 210 individuals successfully 

complete the program;

• Recruit graduate-level students to 

facilitate and implement Fit & Strong! at 

senior designated housing; and

• Train 30 resident Lay Leaders to continue 

offering the program over time.

Proposed Interventions

• Fit & Strong!

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, The Chicago 

Housing Authority will collaborate with the 

following key partners:

• University of Illinois at Chicago’s Center 

for Research on Health and Aging (CRHA) 

in the Institute for Health Research and 

Policy at the College of Applied Sciences

• UIC’s College of Applied Sciences, 

Department of Occupational Therapy 

Anticipated Results 

The Chicago Housing Authority and its partners 

propose to achieve the following results: 

• Improve confidence in seniors in 

subsidized housing surviving with low 

income, limited social support, and 

limited mobility;

• Reduce the number of falls through

increasing falls prevention awareness and 

education in seniors in subsidized 

housing; and
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

• Provide occupational therapist students 

exposure to an often-underserved 

population of seniors.

Contact:

Anne Lehocky

Chicago Housing Authority

alehocky@thecha.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov