alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52655-52656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 606-027--California]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Availability of the 
Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Kilarc-Cow Creek 
Hydroelectric Project

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 
as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application, filed March 12, 2009, 
requesting surrender of the Kilarc-Cow Creek Project (FERC No. 606) 
license. The project is located on Old Cow Creek, South Cow Creek, and 
tributaries in Shasta County, California. The Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued for public comment on June 22, 2010, 
followed by two public meetings. Commission staff has prepared the 
Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the project.
    The FEIS contains staff's evaluation of the licensee's proposal and 
the alternatives for surrendering the license of the Kilarc-Cow Creek 
Project. The FEIS documents the views of governmental agencies, non-
governmental organizations, affected Indian tribes, the public, the 
licensee, and Commission staff.
    A copy of the FEIS is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, Room 2A, located at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The FEIS also may be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, under the eLibrary link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1e7e4f3e2eecfcdc8cfc4f2d4d1d1ced3d5e1c7c4d3c28fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="581e1d0a1b17363431363d0b2d2828372a2c183e3d2a3b763f372e">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support.
    For further information, contact the environmental coordinator, 
CarLisa Linton-Peters at (202) 502-8416, or via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e7e5f6e8edf7e5aae8edeaf0ebeaa9f4e1f0e1f6f7c4e2e1f6e7aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0a3a1b2aca9b3a1eeaca9aeb4afaeedb0a5b4a5b2b380a6a5b2a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 52656]]


    Dated: August 16, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-21449 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Metropolitan Community Health Services, Inc.

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for addressing behavioral health 

and/or chronic pain among older adults 

and adults with disabilities living in your 

community.

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based selfmanagement education and/or selfmanagement support programs to 

empower them to better manage these 

chronic condition(s), while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

The Metropolitan Community Health Services, 

Inc. (MCHS) and its partners will: 

• Increase access to Chronic Disease SelfManagement Education programs;

• Implement sustainable funding 

arrangements; and

• Embed the programs into a prevention 

program network via a Network Hub 

Model.

Proposed Interventions

• Workplace Chronic Disease SelfManagement Program (wCDSMP)

• Diabetes Self-Management Program 

(DSMP)

• Screening, Brief Intervention, and 

Referral to Treatment Program (SBIRT)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, MCHS will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Albemarle Area Agency on Aging

• A.M.E. Zion Church

• Beaufort County Department of Social 

Services

• Beaufort County Health Department

• Beaufort County Manager

• Centralina Area Council on Aging

• Mid-East Commission Area Agency on 

Aging
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

• North Carolina Center for Health & 

Wellness at UNC Asheville

• North Carolina Department of Health and 

Human Services Division of Aging and 

Adult Services

Anticipated Results

The MCHS and its partners propose to achieve 

the following results: 

• Engage 800 older adults and older adults 

with disabilities in wCDSMP, DSMP, 

and/or SBIRT programs;

• Achieve a participant completion rate of 

70%;

• Reduce the number of emergency room 

visits, hospitalizations, and expenditures 

related to chronic disease or pain;

• Decrease substance use disorders related 

to chronic disease, chronic pain, or 

behavioral or mental health issues; and

• Develop a business plan that supports the 

program(s) beyond the grant funding 

period.

Contact:

Mariana Rolinksy

Metropolitan Community Health Services, Inc.

mrolinsky@agapechc.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
#### CALVIN L. HATHAWAY, Appellant, *v.*EDWIN W. HOWELL, Respondent.

*Execution—issued before entry of judgment.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered on the report of a referee.

This was an action to recover the possession of certain hotel furniture, of the value of $10,000.

The case was once before tried, and the defendant had judgment', which was affirmed at the General Term, but reversed by the Commission of Appeals.*

The defendant, as sheriff of Chemung county, justified taking and holding the property under and by virtue of an execution against one Slater, dated May 26,1866, reciting a judgment of that date as the basis for its issue. It was shown that papers were prepared for obtaining a judgment, by confession, on Saturday evening, May twenty-sixth, and left in the clerk’s office to be entered up after hours, but was not and could not be perfected until eight o’clock, Monday the twenty-eighth. This execution was issued and delivered to the sheriff on May twenty-sixth, with directions to levy, and a levy was made on that day. On the former appeal, the Commission held † that an execution did not vest any right or title to the execution debtor’s property in the sheriff until actual levy made; and that a levy must be made during the life of the execution ; that the execution was void; and that no title was acquired by the sheriff by his levy on the twenty-sixth. That the judgment against Slater did not become perfected until eight a. m., on the twenty-eighth, arid no levy was shown to have been made after that date within the life of the execution.

On the second trial, the défendant undertook to show that a new levy was made with this execution after eight o’clock on Monday, the twenty-eighth.

The question passed, on by the General Term was the sufficiency of the evitieñóe on' the sécond trial "to ‘establish a levy on May twenty-eighth. The court was of opinion that that fact was not *271shown by the evidence, and reversed the judgment, granting a new trial, costs to abide the event. ,

*Milo*Goodrich, for the appellant.

*S. B.*Tomlinson, for the respondent.

*

54 N. Y. 97.

†

54 N. Y., 102.

Opinion by

James, J.

Present—Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENERGEN
CORPORATION FOR THE NINE-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000277595
<NAME> ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      286,894
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    290,637
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         115,282
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        11,101
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 704,321
<COMMON>                                           262
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      145,506
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            124,031
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 269,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           279,622
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              34,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,855
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 119,045
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  704,321
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      370,823
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             7,555
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     313,026
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     320,581
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         57,797
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (13,527)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  52,920
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        16,205
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,715
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   36,715
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        11,217
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,654
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          59,371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.01
 MercadoLibre, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Parent company:
 MercadoLibre, Inc.
   Subsidiaries:
 MercadoLibre S.A. (Argentina)
  MercadoLibre S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
  MercadoLivre.Com Atividades de Internet Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoLibre Chile Ltda. (Chile)
  MercadoLibre Colombia, S.A. (Colombia)
  MercadoLibre Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)
  Ibazar.com Atividades de Internet Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoLibre ZonaAmerica S.A. (Uruguay)
  MercadoLibre Ecuador S.A. (Ecuador)
  MercadoLibre Perú S.A. (Peru)
   Hammer.com, LLC
   MercadoPago, LLC




---



##### 



ListaPop, LLC
   Deremate.com de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
  Deremate.com de Uruguay S.A. (Uruguay)
  Deremate.com de Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)
  Deremate.com de Venezuela S.A. (Colombian Branch) (Colombia)
  eBazar.com.br Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoPago.com Representações Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoPago Colombia S.A. (Colombia)
  MercadoPago S.A. (Chile)
  Servicios Administrativos y Comerciales, LLC (Delaware)
  PSGAC Prestadora de Servicios Gerenciales, Administrativos y Comerciales, S.A. de C.V (Mexico)
  Classifieds LLC (Delaware)
    Venecapital Group Inc. (Panama)
  Grupo Veneclasificados C.A. (Venezuela)
  Clasificados Internacionales S.A. (Panama)
  Colclasificados S.A. (Colombia)




---



##### 



Clasificados Florida LLC (Florida)
  DeRemate.com de Argentina S.A.
   DeRemate.com Chile S.A.
  Interactivos y Digitales México S.A. de C.V.
  Compañía de Negocios Interactiva de Colombia E.U.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENERGEN CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>            0000277595
<NAME>           ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                       PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           327,143
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>         542,302
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              171,940
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>             34,963
<OTHER-ASSETS>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,076,348
<COMMON>                                302
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           214,640
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 192,944
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      405,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                366,100
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  123,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         6,648
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      175,233
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>     1,076,348
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           336,465
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  7,544
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          260,707
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          268,251
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              75,758
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                 (17,912)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       68,987
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             18,685
<NET-INCOME>                         50,302
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>               0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        50,302
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              9,929
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            13,598
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               62,745
<EPS-BASIC>                            1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.66


</TABLE>
Visit go.cms.gov/c2c for more information

CMS Product No. 11817

Revised July 2018

Primary Care Provider Emergency Department

You’ll pay your primary care copay, if you have one. This may

cost you between $0 and $50. 

You’ll likely pay a copay, co-insurance, and have to meet your 

deductible before your health plan pays for your costs, especially if it’s not 

an emergency. Your copay may be between $50 and $150.

You go when you feel sick and when you feel well. You should only go when you’re injured or very sick. 

You call ahead to make an appointment. You show up when you need to and wait until they can get to you.

You may have a short wait to be called after you arrive

but you will generally be seen around your appointment time. 

You may wait for several hours before you’re seen if it’s not an 

emergency.

You’ll usually see the same provider each time. You’ll see the provider who is working that day.

Your provider will usually have access to your health record. The provider who sees you probably won’t have access to

your health records. 

Your provider works with you to monitor your chronic conditions

and helps you improve your overall health.

The provider may not know what chronic conditions

you have.

Your provider will check other areas of your health, not just the 

problem that brought you in that day. 

The provider will only check the urgent problem you came

in to treat but might not ask about other concerns.

If you need to see other providers or manage your care, your 

provider can help you make a plan, get your medicines, and 

schedule your recommended follow-up visits or find specialists.

When your visit is over you will be discharged with instructions to 

follow up with your primary care provider and/or specialist. There may 

not be any follow-up support. 

In some areas, you may be able to go to an Urgent Care Center. If Urgent Care is available in your area, call your health plan before you go to find 

out how much you will have to pay.

Differences Between Your Provider’s Office and the Emergency Department 

Paid for by the Department of Health & Human Services.
#### Harrison v. Lane.

November 17th, 1815.

i. Appeals — Costs—Two Copies of Record.† — If. on one appeal, two copies of the record he sent to the appellate court, and docketed on the motion of the appellant; he must pay the costs, occasioned thereby, to the appellee.

†

 See generally, monographic *note*on “Costs” appended to Jones v. Tatum, 19 Gratt. 720; monographic *note*on “Appeal and Error” appended to Hill v. Salem, etc., Turnpike Co., 1 Rob. 263.

In this case, it appearing to the court that the appeal ought not to have been put upon the docket, (the same case, on another record, having been previously docketed, and since decided by this court,) it was ordered that the said appeal be dismissed: and, as this case was docketed on the motion of the appellant, which induced the appellee to employ counsel, it was farther ordered that the appellant pay to the appellee his costs.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 7, 2011, Chemica, 316 
West 130th Street, Los Angeles, California 90061, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk 
manufacturer of Methamphetamine (1105), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The above listed controlled substance is an intermediate in the 
manufacture of Benzphetamine, a schedule III non-narcotic controlled 
substance. The methamphetamine will not be sold as a commercial 
product. The company plans to utilize a bulk active pharmaceutical 
ingredient (API), as an intermediate for the development of another 
controlled substance, and further distribution to its customers. The 
methamphetamine will not be sold.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substance, may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than October 17, 2011.

    Dated: August 10, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-21074 Filed 8-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7103 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD ALAN HUNT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (3:01-cr-00982-MJP)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Alan Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard Alan Hunt appeals the district court’s order

denying a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate, for lack of

jurisdiction, Hunt’s 2002 criminal conviction and sentence. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Hunt, No. 3:01-cr-00982-MJP (D.S.C.

July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2021

No. 04-20-00267-CV

Joe Jesse PONCE III,

Appellant

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-04768

Mary C. Brown, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 11, 2021, we granted Appellant’s unopposed sixth motion for a thirty-day 

extension of time to file the brief, and we ordered Appellant to file his brief by June 14, 2021. 

Before the due date, Appellant filed an unopposed seventh motion for an extension of time to file 

the brief until July 14, 2021. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on May 20, 2020. Appellant has had 

more than one year to secure appellate counsel and file his brief. Because of COVID-19 and 

Appellant’s unusual circumstances, this court has granted six previous extensions of time to file 

the brief. However, no further extensions of time to file Appellant’s brief will be granted.

We ORDER Appellant to file his brief not later than July 14, 2021. 

We warn Appellant that if he fails to file his brief as ordered, this court may dismiss this 

appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of June, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### Shubert *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,'

Decided December 11, 1906.

Indictment for assault. Before Judge Kimsey. Habershamf superior court. September 29, 1906.

I. *L. Oakes,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Charters, solicitor-general,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

A conviction of the offense of assault is unauthorized when the evidence discloses that the only act of the accused relied on to sustain the conviction is that the accused, who had committed no offense and against whom no warrant had been issued, raised a stick and drew it back in a striking position, with a threat to use the same, when officers with a warrant against a relative approached him and endeavored to compel him to go with them until they had made the arrest of such relative. Even if, under ordinary circumstances, such conduct would have amounted to an assault, the accused was justified in the act that he committed. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
JAMES WYROSDICK,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1259

Opinion filed April 1, 2015.

Petition Seeking Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

James Wyrosdick, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.