alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[AZ 086-0207b; FRL-6710-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona State 
Implementation Plan Revision, Maricopa County Environmental Services 
Department

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Maricopa County 
Environmental Services Department (MCESD) portion of the Arizona State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns volatile organic 
compound (VOC) emissions from ferrous sand casting operations. We are 
proposing to approve a local rule to regulate this emission source 
under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 12, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief 
(AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
    You can inspect copies of the submitted rule and EPA's technical 
support documents (TSDs) at our Region IX office during normal business 
hours. You may also see copies of the submitted rule at the following 
locations:

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 3033 North Central Avenue, 
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, Air Quality 
Division, 1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 201, Phoenix, AZ 85004

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR-
4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, (415) 744-1135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local 
rule: MCESD Rule 347. In the Rules and Regulations section of this 
Federal Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final 
action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is 
not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will 
publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the 
comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not 
plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in 
commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse 
comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, 
please see the direct final action.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 00-14172 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification by William Nurthen pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Inforte Corp. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                |  |     |  | Inforte Corp.          
| | -------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |                |  |     |  |                        
| |                |  | By: |  | /s/ William Nurthen    
| | March 26, 2007 |  |     |  | William Nurthen,       
| |                |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

END OF FILING

---
Making the Connection

Sales 101

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
The Process

1-2-3- and be ready for detours

 Research

 Setting the Appointment

 First Appointment Steps

 The Close

 Timing

 Messaging Tools

 Expectations

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Research

Know Yourself and Them

 You:

 Strengths

 Goals

 Weaknesses

 Be Ready for Yes

 Opportunities:

 Insurance Companies

 Skilled Nursing

 Hospitals

 Physician Groups

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Subcontractor Position

Little Room for Negotiation

 Look For:

 Exclusivity

 Duration

 Requirements

 Billing

 Benefits:

 Quick Turnaround

 Model Contract

 Established Procedures

 Established Expectations

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Direct Contractor – Hospital

You Control Negotiations

 Determine:

 Service Offering

 Patients

 Duration

 Outcomes

 Billing – Fee for Service 

or Capitated

 Negatives:

 Long Negotiation Period

 Not a Priority

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Setting the Appointment

Stay Focused

1. Opening Statement

2. Reason For the Call

3. Credibility Statement

4. Schedule the Appointment

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
First Appointment

Follow the Steps

1. Purpose of the Meeting/Establish Credibility

2. Uncover Needs/Ask Questions

5 Things to Uncover

1. Need/Desire

2. What

3. Timing

4. Who 

5. Funding

3. Schedule Next Steps

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Things to Bring on Your 1st Appointment

Credibility

1. Case Statement

2. Organizational Brochure

3. Newspaper Articles

4. Reference Letters/Brochures

5. Annual Report

6. Data Sets/Infographics re: Impact

7. Articles

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Presentation Appointment

The Close

1. Recap the Needs and Close

2. Present the Plan and Close

3. Ask for a Commitment and Close 

4. Develop a Timeline and Close

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
Image is Important

Tools To Reinforce Your Image

 Facebook

 Twitter

 Newsletter

 Email

 Newspaper Articles

 Research Papers

 Press Releases

 Funders

 Board/Staff/Volunteers

Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services mowsos.org 925.937.8311
EXHIBIT 10.2

                          CERTIFICATION OF NICK DEMARE




                                      -105-

<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.2
                                 ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hilton Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending May 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Nick DeMare  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



 /s/ Nick DeMare
-----------------------
Nick DeMare
Chief Financial Officer

                                      -106-

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
------------


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------



We have issued our report dated September 14, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements  of  Financial  Content,  Inc.,  (the  "Company")  on Form
10-KSB/A  for the years  ended June 30,  2004 and 2003 which is included in this
Registration  Statement.  We  consent  to the  inclusion  of our  report in this
Registration Statement.


//s// Pohl, McNabola, Berg, & Company LLP
- --------------------------------------------
Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company LLP


San Francisco, California
March 23, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held.

# DATES:

Tuesday, September 20, 2011, at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence.

However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

Dated: August 18, 2011.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2011-21483 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3238-3239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1394]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Ocean Transportation Intermediary License No. 16211N]


Global Shipping, Inc.; Order of Revocation

    Section 19(b) of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended, provides 
that the Federal Maritime Commission (``Commission'') may revoke any 
Ocean Transportation Intermediary (``OTI'') license for failure of a 
licensee to maintain valid proof of financial responsibility on file 
with the Commission. The Commission's implementing regulations, 46 CFR 
515.16(a), provide for such revocation effective as of the termination 
date of the proof of financial responsibility, unless the licensee 
shall have submitted a valid replacement before such termination date.
    The surety bond issued in favor of Global Shipping, Inc., Parkway 
One, Suite 201, 2697 International Parkway, Virginia Beach, VA 23452, 
was cancelled effective December 9, 1999. On November 23, 1999, the 
licensee was advised that it is prohibited from providing 
transportation by water as an NVOCC in the foreign commerce of the 
United States unless the Commission received a valid replacement proof 
of financial responsibility with an effective date on or before 
December 9, 1999. The licensee has failed to provide such a 
replacement.
    Therefore, By virtue of the authority vested in me by the 
Commission as set forth in 46 CFR 501.27(g)(1998);
    Notice is hereby given, That the OTI license issued to Global 
Shipping, Inc.

[[Page 3239]]

is hereby revoked effective December 9, 1999.
    It is ordered, That the above OTI license be returned to the 
Commission for cancellation.
    It is further ordered, That a notice of this action be published in 
the Federal Register and a copy of this Order be served upon Global 
Shipping, Inc.

Austin L. Schmitt,
Director, Bureau of Tariffs, Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 00-1394 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6235

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SAAD SUBHI BASHA , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:16

- cr - 00059

- FDW

- 1 ; 3:18

- cv 00281

- FDW )

Submitted : April 18 , 2019 Decided: April 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Saad Subhi Basha, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Saad Subhi Basha seeks to appeal the d istrict court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not is sue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that th e district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prison er must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ba sha has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Umberto Ginocchietti, Also Known as Terenzio Giglieri, Appellant.

Submitted September 9, 1996;

decided September 19, 1996

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that it does not lie *(see,*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601).
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.207 How and where may I view docketed documents? ( a ) All material in a docket under § 148.205 of this part is available to the public for inspection and copying at Commandant (CG-5P) at the address under “Commandant (CG-5P)” in § 148.5 of this part, except for— ( 1 ) Contracts under 33 U.S.C. 1504(c)(2)(B) for the construction or operation of a deepwater port; and
( 2 ) Material designated under paragraph (b) of this section as a trade secret, or commercial or financial information that is claimed to be privileged or confidential.
( b ) A person submitting material that contains either a trade secret or commercial or financial information under paragraph (a)(2) of this section must designate those portions of the material that are privileged or confidential. Section 148.221 contains procedures for objecting to these claims.
( c ) Docketed material for each deepwater port project is also available to the public electronically at the Federal Docket website at *www.regulations.gov*. The projects are also listed by name and the assigned docket number at the CG-OES-2 website: *https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/Assistant-Commandant-for-Prevention-Policy-CG-5P/Commercial-Regulations-standards-CG-5PS/Office-of-Operating-and-Environmental-Standards/vfos12/*.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58279, Sept. 18, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001075445
<NAME>                        DIVERSIFIED PRODUCT INSPECTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         62,909
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  95,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               654,554
<PP&E>                                         150,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (52,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 654,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          747,641
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,116
<OTHER-SE>                                     (159,595)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   654,554
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               753,235
<CGS>                                          1,178,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,178,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,266)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (434,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (434,713)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1919

___________ Larry Coffman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Jay Nixon; Joan L. Moriarty, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 1, 2004 Filed: September 3, 2004

___________ Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Larry Coffman appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, which he filed in forma pauperis (IFP). Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, seeMoore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude the district court properly dismissed the complaint for the reasons explained by the court, see Waller v. Groose , 38 F.3d 1007, 1008 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (previous preservice dismissal as frivolous does not bar plaintiff from asserting identical claim in-2- subsequent fee-paid complaint, but such dismissal does have res judicata effect on frivolousness determination for future IFP complaint asserting same claims). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13899]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 19, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, 
Assistant Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. John L. Franklin, Sidney, Montana; to acquire voting shares of 
1st United Bancorporation, Inc., Sidney, Montana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of 1st Bank, Sidney, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 30, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13899 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.39 Authorized closure of drawbridge due to infrequent requests for openings. ( a ) When there have been no requests for drawbridge openings for at least two years, a bridge owner may request in writing that the District Commander authorize the drawbridge to remain closed to navigation and to be untended.
( b ) The District Commander may: ( 1 ) Authorize the closure of the drawbridge;
( 2 ) Set out any conditions in addition to the requirement in paragraph (d): and
( 3 ) Revoke an authorization and order the drawbridge returned to operation when necessary.
( c ) All drawbridges authorized to remain closed to navigation, under this section, must be maintained in operable condition.
( d ) Authorization under this section does not: ( 1 ) Authorize physical changes to the drawbridge structure, or
( 2 ) Authorize removal of the operating machinery.
( e ) Drawbridges authorized under this section to remain closed to navigation and to be untended are identified in subpart B of this part.
[USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70308, Dec. 4, 2006]