alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### No.

___________________

IN RE : § IN THE TEXAS COURT

K EVIN RICHARD JOLIET § Relator § § OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW KEVIN RICHARD JOLIET, by and through Wes Ball, his

attorney of record and files this Motion for Leave to File Application for Writ of

Prohibition and in support thereof would show the Court as follows:

I.

Contemporaneous with the filing of this motion is being filed movant

Joliet’s Application for Writ of Prohibition. This Court has jurisdiction for such

wr it application pursuant to Article 5, §5(c) of the Texas Constitution which

provides:

Subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law, the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Judges thereof shall have the power to issue the writ of habeas corpus, and, in criminal law matters, the writs of mandamus, procedendo, prohibition, and certiorari.

This case is a criminal law matter involving the proposed incarceration of a felony

probationer. The writ application complains of future proposed actions by a trial

court and thus a writ of prohibition is the appropriate legal process to seek relief. WR-84,279-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/2/2015 6:07:56 PM Accepted 12/3/2015 8:19:11 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2 The writ application is being filed as the Relator has no adequate remedy at

law, is clearly entitled to relief.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, movant Joliet re quest leave of

this Court to file his Application for Writ of Prohibition and for such other and

further relief to which he may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Wes Ball WES BALL 4025 Woodland P ark Blvd. Suite 100 Arlington, Texas 76013 Email: WBnotices@ballhase.com Telephone: (817)860

- 5000 Fax No.: (817)860

- 6645 State Bar No. 01643100

ATTORNEY FOR RELATOR



### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On the 2 nd 

### day of December, 2015, a true and correct copy of this

motion was transmitted to the Honorable Mollee Westfall, Judge of the

371 st 

### District Court of Tarrant County, Texas and Charles Reynolds,

Judicial Staff Counsel for Tarrant County, Texas.

/s/ Wes Ba ll

_______________________________ WES BALL
Termination Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AGREEMENT 
 This Agreement is dated as of July 13, 2012 (the
“Agreement”) by and among Hicks Acquisition Company II, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Buyer”), Paperweight Development Corp., a Wisconsin corporation (“PDC”), and Appleton Papers Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“Appleton”). 
 WHEREAS 

Buyer, HH-HACII, L.P., PDC and Appleton are parties to an Equity Purchase Agreement dated as of May 16, 2012, as amended (the
“Equity Purchase Agreement”); 
 Buyer and PDC are parties to a Cross Purchase Agreement dated as of
May 16, 2012 (the “Cross Purchase Agreement”); and 
 Buyer, PDC and Appleton wish to terminate the Equity
Purchase Agreement and the Cross Purchase Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Buyer and Appleton hereby terminate the Equity Purchase Agreement in accordance with Section 9.1(a)(i) thereof. However, as set
forth in Section 9.1(d) of the Equity Purchase Agreement, the respective obligations of the parties pursuant to (i) Section 6.1(d) thereof, except as otherwise provided in the Confidentiality Agreement (as defined in the Equity
Purchase Agreement), (ii) Section 6.6 thereof and (iii) ARTICLE IX thereof survive the termination of the Equity Purchase Agreement. 
 2. Buyer and PDC hereby terminate the Cross Purchase Agreement in accordance with Section 6.1(a)(i) thereof. However, as set forth in Section 6.1(d) of the Cross Purchase Agreement, the
respective obligations of the parties pursuant to ARTICLE VI thereof survive the termination of the Cross Purchase Agreement. 

3. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware. 

4. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

 5. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of
which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. 
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the
date first above written. 
  

			
	 HICKS ACQUISITION COMPANY II, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Christina Weaver Vest
	 Name:
	 	Christina Weaver Vest
	 Title:
	 	CEO
	
	 PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Mark R. Richards
	 Name:
	 	Mark R. Richards
	 Title:
	 	President/CEO
	
	 APPLETON PAPERS INC.

		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Mark R. Richards
	 Name: 
	 	Mark R. Richards
	 Title:
	 	President/CEO
#### Ward *&*Brother *v.*Kennesaw Fertilizer Company. Ward *&*Brother *v.*Union Fertilizer Company.

Submitted July 18,

-Decided December 13, 1906.

Certiorari. Before George D. Anderson,. judge pro hae vice. Cobb superior court. December *22,*1905.

ET. *B. Moss,*for plaintiffs in error.

Lumpkin, J.

1. The act of 1899 (Acts 1899, p. 78) which declared that the lien of mortgages given to secure the payment of debts for supplies,' money, and other articles of necessity, including live stock, to aid in making and gathering such crops, shall be superior to judgments of older date than such mortgages, does not authorize the holder of such a mortgage to interpose a claim to the levy of an execution issued under an older judgment and thereby prevent any sale at all.

2. If the instrument under which the claim was interposed in this case be treated as falling within the provisions of that act, its lien could not be asserted by claim. If it be treated, not as a mortgage, but as a bill of sale conveying title which could be asserted by claim, the title so conveyed was not free from levy under an older judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 In Connection with the Annual Report of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin D. Lemley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Kevin D. LemleyKevin D. LemleyMarch 19, 2005
    Chief Financial Officer 100
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Traffic safety facts. Schoolbuses**
 
1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000
 
SuDoc Number:TD 8.27/12:
Item Number:0982-D-60 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000551991
 
December 4, 2019
#### § 146.102 Definitions.

For the purpose of this subpart:

*Arrives on the OCS* means when a floating facility enters any OCS block area for the purpose of engaging in operations subject to the jurisdiction of the OCS Lands Act.

*OCS block area* means the names given by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, (BOEM) to define the OCS areas used to facilitate management or leasing on the OCS.

*U.S.,* as used in the term, “U.S. floating facility,” means a “floating facility,” that is registered, documented, or certificated under the laws of the United States or that is not registered, documented, or certificated under the laws of the United States or any other nation.

[USCG-2008-1088, 76 FR 2260, Jan. 13, 2011, as amended by USCG-2013-0797, 79 FR 36405, June 27, 2014]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 718 

Designating November 30, 2008, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2008 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, and Mr. ISAKSON) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

DECEMBER 9, 2008 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 30, 2008, as ‘‘Drive Safer Sunday’’. 

Whereas motor vehicle travel is the primary means of transportation in the United States; 

Whereas everyone driving on the roads and highways needs 

to do so more safely to reduce deaths and injuries resulting from motor vehicle accidents; 

Whereas, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, wearing a seat belt saved 15,434 lives in 

2004, 15,632 lives in 2005, and 15,383 lives in 2006; 

Whereas Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters has urged 

all people of the United States to understand the life-saving importance of wearing a seat belt and has encouraged 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

SRES 718 ATS 

motorists to drive safely, not just during the holiday season, but each time they get behind the wheel; and 

Whereas the Sunday after Thanksgiving is the busiest highway traffic day of the year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages— 

3 (A) high schools, colleges, universities, ad4 ministrators, teachers, primary schools, and 

5 secondary schools to launch campus-wide edu6 cational campaigns to urge students to drive 

7 safely; 

8 (B) national trucking firms to alert truck 

9 drivers to focus on driving safely on the Sunday 

10 after Thanksgiving, and to publicize the impor11 tance of the day using Citizen’s Band (‘‘CB’’) 

12 radios and truck stops across the United 

13 States; 

14 (C) clergy to remind members to travel 

15 safely en route to religious services and gath16 erings; 

17 (D) law enforcement personnel to remind 

18 drivers and passengers to drive safely on the 

19 Sunday after Thanksgiving; and 

20 (E) all people of the United States to use 

21 the Sunday after Thanksgiving as an opporVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:48 Dec 09, 2008 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR718.ATS SR718

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

SRES 718 ATS 

1 tunity to educate themselves about highway 

2 safety; and 

3 (2) designates November 30, 2008, as ‘‘Drive 

4 Safer Sunday’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### State of Vermont *v.*Jerome B. Parker.

*Larceny. Sufficiency of Indictment.*

In larceny of a feather bed, it is sufficient on motion in arrest, that the indictment describe the property as “ one feather bed.”

Indictment for larceny. The indictment described the property stolen as “ one feather bed.” Trial by jury and verdict of guilty, September term, 1873, Peck, J., presiding. The respondent moved in arrest of judgment for that the indictment did not describe the property alleged to have been stolen, with sufficient definiteness and particularity.

Motion overruled and indictment adjudged sufficient. Exceptions by the respondent.

*L. L.*Durant, for the respondent.

*W. P.*Dillingham, state’s attorney, for the state.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ross, J.

The only question raised by the motion in arrest is, whether the property stolen is described with sufficient definiteness in the indictment. We think the description is sufficiently definite. Persons of common apprehension of the meaning and use of language, understand that by “ a feather bed,” is meant a single article, composed of a quantity of feathers enclosed in a bed tick. It is as much a single article as very many things which are composed of different materials, but which have a definite use. To ordinary people, no more definite idea of the property stolen would have been conveyed, if the pleader had been to the trouble of stating the exact number, color, and kind of feathers, and the exact number, length, size, and material of the threads in the tick. We do not think the description is open to the charge of being a “lumping description ” of the property stolen; nor, that the respondent labored under any inconvenience in preparing his defence, from an inability to understand from the description the precise thing, the stealing of which he was charged with.

The judgment of this court is, that there was no error in the proceedings of the county court, and that the respondent takes nothing by his exceptions.
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.47 Information for master. A master or person in charge of a new vessel shall operate the vessel in accordance with the information required in 46 CFR 31.10-30(d) that includes the following: ( a ) Stability information.
( b ) Damage stability information determined in accordance with the criteria contained in appendix B of this part.
( c ) Loading and distribution of cargo information determined in compliance with the damage stability criteria required in appendix B of this part.
[CGD 74-32, 40 FR 48283, Oct. 14, 1976, as amended by CGD 75-240, 41 FR 54180, Dec. 13, 1976]
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 112 

Expressing support for designation of a ‘‘National Lao-Hmong Recognition 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2009 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin (for herself and Mr. MCHENRY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of a ‘‘National LaoHmong Recognition Day’’. 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong, which means ‘‘free people’’, are 

Laotian members of the Hmong tribe and are noted for 

their warrior tradition, loyalty, and bravery; 

Whereas beginning in 1960, the United States recruited 

thousands of the Lao-Hmong to fight against the Communist Pathet Lao and North Vietnamese Army regulars 

in Laos; 

Whereas the United States relied heavily on the Lao-Hmong 

Special Guerrilla Units to engage in direct combat with 

North Vietnamese troops from 1960 to 1975; 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong conducted tactical guerrilla actions, 

flew thousands of deadly combat missions in support of 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 112 IH 

the Armed Forces and the Central Intelligence Agency, 

and fought in conventional and guerrilla combat clashes 

with extreme casualties; 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong, although outnumbered, fought 

against enemy forces to disrupt the flow of troops and 

war supplies along the Ho Chi Minh Trail; 

Whereas the Lao-Hmong protected United States personnel, 

guarded United States Air Force radar installations, 

gathered critical intelligence about enemy operations, and 

undertook rescue missions to save the lives of downed 

United States pilots; 

Whereas more than 35,000 of the Lao-Hmong lost their lives, 

and many more were seriously injured and disabled; 

Whereas thousands of Lao-Hmong suffered grievous injuries 

and permanent disabilities, and thousands more were 

captured and sent to concentration camps; 

Whereas after the conclusion of the war, many Lao-Hmong 

soldiers were the victims of acts of retribution and atrocities by the Pathet Lao, causing many of the Lao-Hmong 

to flee to neighboring Thailand and become refugees; and 

Whereas beginning with the City Council of Golden, Colorado, in 1995, various State and local governments have 

issued proclamations declaring July 22 as ‘‘Lao-Hmong 

Recognition Day’’, and the establishment of a ‘‘National 

Lao-Hmong Recognition Day’’ would recognize the bravery, sacrifice, and loyalty to the United States exhibited 

by the Lao-Hmong in Southeast Asia: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 112 IH 

1 (1) expresses support for the designation of 

2 ‘‘National Lao-Hmong Recognition Day’’; and 

3 (2) requests that the President issue a procla4 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe ‘‘National Lao-Hmong Recognition Day’’ 

6 with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Joachim J. Brown, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.
| /s/ Joachim J. Brown    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| Joachim J. Brown        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| March 25, 2007          |   |

 

----
7/8/2014
USDA
2a Ces

Beltsville \ BARC

arch

Enter Keywords

Advanced Search

Browse By Subject

> Home
> About Us

Programs and Projects

© Subjects of
Investigation

® Airborne Remote
Sensing Basics

ARS Remote Sensing
Workshop

° OPES

° Crop Condition and
Yield Research

° Jornada Experiment
® Monsoon '90
° Soil Moisture Program

® Remote Sensing in ARS
Workshop 2000

> Products & Services
> People & Places

> News & Events:

> Partnering

> Careers

|

United State
Agricultural Research Service

Animal & Natural Resources

Department Of Agriculture

Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory

You are here: Research /

esearch

Research Project: Assessment of Natural Resource
Conservation Practice Effectiveness Within the Choptank
River Watershed

Location: Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory
2005 Annual Report

4d.Progress report.

This report serves to document research conducted under an
Interagency reimbursable Agreement between the ARS-Environmental
Quality Laboratory and USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service.
Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent
project 1265-13610-019-00D entitled, "EVALUATING WATER QUALITY
PROCESSES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RISK ASSESSMENT AND DECISION
SUPPORT TOOLS." In the last year, $150,000 was received to support
a new project to determine the effectiveness of conservation practices
in protecting water quality in the Choptank River Watershed, a
tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. This funding was used to support a
USDA research associate and for analytical and travel costs within the
Environmental Quality Laboratory, and $70,383 was transferred to
University of Maryland, Horn Point Environmental Laboratory via a new
SCA 1265-13610-019-05S "EVALUATION OF CONSERVATION PRACTICE
EFFECTIVENESS IN WATER QUALITY PROTECTION IN THE CHOPTANK
RIVER WATERSHED" as part of the overall budget submitted to NRCS.

Last Modified: 05/08/2009

ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House

ARS Home } About ARS ; Help | Contact Us; En Espafiol
i) Printable Version

ARS Project: Assessment of Natural Resource Conservation Practice Effectiveness Within the Choptank River Watershed (408915) Annual Report

= E-mail this page

Project Team
McCarty, Gregory
Sadeghi, Ali
Hapeman, Cathleen
o Rice, Clifford
o McConnell, Laura

Project Annual Reports
o FY 2008
o FY 2007
o FY 2006
o FY 2005

Related National Programs

Water Availability and
° Water Management (211)

Global Change (204)

https:/|web.archive.org web/20090509172256/http:/hmww.ars.usda.goviresearch/projects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=4089158fy=2005

4
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 650 

Recognizing the importance of National Neighbor Day, National Good 

Neighbor Day, and National Neighborhood Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2008 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. TESTER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 18 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of National Neighbor Day, National Good Neighbor Day, and National Neighborhood 

Day. 

Whereas gestures of welcoming and kindness between neighbors foster community peace, harmony, and understanding; 

Whereas being good neighbors to those around us encourages 

mutual respect and friendship; 

Whereas neighborhoods facilitate positive civic engagement 

and enhance the foundation of an effective and more caring society; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

SRES 650 ATS 

Whereas National Neighbor Day, celebrated annually on the 

Sunday before Memorial Day weekend in May, was first 

celebrated in 1993 in Westerly, Rhode Island, to promote 

equality, dignity, and respect and to encourage love of 

one’s neighbor; 

Whereas National Good Neighbor Day, celebrated annually 

on the fourth Sunday of September, was first celebrated 

in the 1970s in Lakeside, Montana, to place a greater 

emphasis on the importance of community and being a 

good neighbor; and 

Whereas National Neighborhood Day, celebrated annually on 

the third Sunday of September, was first celebrated in 

Providence, Rhode Island, to inspire, build, and sustain 

neighborhood relationships and foster civic engagement: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate calls upon the people of 

2 the United States and interested groups and organiza3 tions— 

4 (1) to celebrate the goals of National Neighbor 

5 Day, National Good Neighbor Day, and National 

6 Neighborhood Day in 2008; and 

7 (2) to undertake appropriate ceremonies, 

8 events, and activities associated with those goals. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS