alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Management's  Assertion on Compliance with the Minimum Servicing  Standards
     Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers



     Report of Management


     We, as members of  management  of Midland Loan  Services,  Inc.  (MLS),  an
     indirectly   wholly-owned   subsidiary  of  PNC  Bank  Corp.  (PNCBC),  are
     responsible for complying with the minimum servicing standards as set forth
     in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
     Program  for  Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP)  except  for  commercial  loan  and
     multifamily servicing,  minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI.1, which the
     Mortgage Bankers  Association of America has interpreted as inapplicable to
     such servicing.  We are also  responsible for  establishing and maintaining
     effective  internal control over compliance with these  standards.  We have
     performed  an  evaluation  of MLS'  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
     standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1999 and for the year
     then ended. Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended
     December 31, 1999, MLS complied, in all material respects, with the minimum
     servicing standards set forth in the USAP.


     As of and for this same period,  PNCBC had in effect a fidelity bond in the
     amount of $300,000,000  and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of
     $20,000,000.



     /s/ C.J. Sipple
     C.J. Sipple
     Executive Vice President


     /s/ Steven W. Smith
     Steven W. Smith
     Executive Vice President

January 20, 2000
# ToC

Table B-1: List of Groups and Sub-Groups for Complaint Categories

Table B-3: Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number)

Table B-4: Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Percentage)

Table B-5: Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Rank)

Region 1 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 2 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 3 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 4 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 5 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 6 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 7 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 8 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 9 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

Region 10 Complaint Categories for Nursing Facilities by State (Number, Percent, Rank)

# B-1 cat list

Table of Contents

# B-3 NF Numb sorted

Table of Contents

Complaint Categories/State (see Table B-1 for Codes)

# B-4 NF Pct sorted

Table of Contents

Complaint Categories/State (see Table B-1 for Codes)

# B-5 NF Rank sorted

Table of Contents

Complaint Categories/State (see Table B-1 for Codes)

# Region1 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

Table of Contents

See Table B-1 for Codes

# Region2 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region3 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region4 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region5 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region6 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region7 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region8 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region9 NF Numbers, Pcts, Ranks

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents

# Region10 NF Numbers, Pcts, Rank

See Table B-1 for Codes

Table of Contents
SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

**Subject**:Obligation Requirement for Title VII Funds

**Inquiry Source**:AoA Region II

**Stat. & Reg.**

**Basis**:45 CFR Part 92, Section 92.23

**Key Words**:Title VII, Funding, Obligation Deadline

**ADDRIS Code**:FA-7A-1

**Question**:What Federal requirement is there, if any, that Title VII Older Americans Act funds, which are normally allotted to a State Agency on Aging, be obligated by the State agency before the end of the Federal Fiscal Year in which the funds are awarded to the State agency?

**Response**:The Federal regulation that addresses this matter is 45 CFR Part 92 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.  Specifically, Section 92.23 - Period of availability of funds states:

(a) *General*.  Where a funding period is specified, a grantee may charge to the award only costs resulting from obligations of the funding period unless carryover of unobligated balances is permitted, in which case the carryover balances may be charged for costs resulting from obligations of the subsequent funding period.  (See attached)

**Discussion**:  The Title VII grant award identifies the funding period which begins October 1 of the current fiscal year and ends September 30 of that same fiscal year.  The State Agencies on Aging must obligate all Title VII funds during the funding period.  Therefore, the States are required to obligate all Title VII funds on or before the end of the specified funding period.  Ordinarily, the only funds that may be obligated during the subsequent funding period are those funds that are awarded through the reallotment process (Section 703(b) of the Act).  Therefore, for example, if a State did not obligate all of its FY 1994 Title VII allotment, with the exception of those funds received through reallotment, by September 30, 1994, the State would no longer have authority to obligate those funds and the funds would revert to the Federal government.

The only carry-over balances that are permitted at this time are balances from those funds that are awarded through the reallotment process.  As with Title III, the Title VII reallotment grant award document will specifically state that reallotment funds must be obligated by September 30 of the succeeding fiscal year.  In addition, these funds must be identified as such on the fourth quarter 269 report.

For your information, current Older Americans Act regulations in 45 CFR Part 1321, Section 1321.5 lists 45 CFR Part 92 and other regulations which are applicable to activities under Title VII.

  OSCP-FY-92-29, dated March 3, 1992, addresses this issue as it applies to Title III funds.

Fernando M. Torres-GilDate

Assistant Secretary for Aging

Attachment
AIDD Help American Vote Act (HAVA) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2014 Annual Allocation

3/18/2014

State/Territory

AIDD Help 

American Vote Act 

(HAVA)

Alabama $70,000

Alaska $70,000

Arizona $70,000

Arkansas $70,000

California $348,401

Colorado $70,000

Connecticut $70,000

Delaware $70,000

District of Columbia $70,000

Florida $176,919

Georgia $90,851

Hawaii $70,000

Idaho $70,000

Illinois $117,917

Indiana $70,000

Iowa $70,000

Kansas $70,000

Kentucky $70,000

Louisiana $70,000

Maine $70,000

Maryland $70,000

Massachusetts $70,000

Michigan $90,516

Minnesota $70,000

Mississippi $70,000

Missouri $70,000

Montana $70,000

Nebraska $70,000

Nevada $70,000

New Hampshire $70,000

New Jersey $81,186

New Mexico $70,000

New York $179,233

North Carolina $89,314

North Dakota $70,000

Ohio $105,727

Oklahoma $70,000

Oregon $70,000

Pennsylvania $116,894

Rhode Island $70,000

South Carolina $70,000

South Dakota $70,000

Tennessee $70,000

Texas $238,662

Utah $70,000

Vermont $70,000

Virginia $74,970

Washington $70,000

West Virginia $70,000

Wisconsin $70,000

Wyoming $70,000

American Samoa $35,000

Guam $35,000

Puerto Rico $70,000

Virgin Islands $35,000

TOTAL $4,615,590
```

[House Report 111-96]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     111-96

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 1728) TO AMEND THE TRUTH 
   IN LENDING ACT TO REFORM CONSUMER MORTGAGE PRACTICES AND PROVIDE 
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SUCH PRACTICES, TO PROVIDE CERTAIN MINIMUM STANDARDS 
          FOR CONSUMER MORTGAGE LOANS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

 May 5, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Ms. Pingree of Maine, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 400]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 400, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1728, the 
``Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act.'' The 
resolution provides for one hour of general debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Financial Services. The resolution waives 
all points of order against consideration of the bill except 
those arising under clause 9 and 10 of rule XXI. The resolution 
provides that the Committee of the Whole shall rise without 
motion after general debate and that no further consideration 
of the bill shall occur except pursuant to a subsequent order 
of the House.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the bill (except for clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI) includes a 
waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII, requiring a three-day 
layover of the committee report.

                                  

```
<PAGE>
		    Annual Statement of Compliance


June 15, 2004

Subject: C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates,
Series 1999-CB5

To Whom It May Concern:

The undersigned Officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the
Annual Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement for the above referenced security and certifies
that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during such
preceding fiscal year (or such shorter period in the case of the
first such report) and of performance under this Agreement has been
made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under this Agreement for 1999.



Litton Loan Servicing LP

/s/ Janice McClure
------------------
Janice McClure
Senior Vice President
June 15, 2004


/s/ Kathryn D. Nelson
----------------------
Kathryn D. Nelson
Assistant Secretary
June 15, 2004
<PAGE>

                      [LETTERHEAD OF ARTHUR ANDERSON LLP]

                     REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

The Stockholder
To New South Federal Savings Bank:

We have examined managements assertion about NEW SOUTH FEDERAL SAVING BANKSs
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP) and that New South Federal Savings Bank had in effect
a fidelity bond and an errors and omissions policy in the amounts of
$6,000,000 and $6,000,000, respectively, as of and for the year ended December
31, 1999, included in the accompanying managements compliance assertion.
Management is responsible for New South Federal Savings Banks compliance with
those minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and an
errors and omissions policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about New South Federal Savings Banks
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on New South Federal Savings Banks
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements assertion that New South Federal Savings Bank
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards and that New
South Federal Savings Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and an errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $6,000,000 and $6,000,000 respectively,
as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, is fairly stated, in all
material respects.


/s/ Arthur Anderson LLP
-----------------------
Arthur Anderson LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
March 3, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7561]

Consistent with the authority contained in section 604 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Pub. L. 107-228) (the “Act”), the Delegation of Authority in the April 30, 2009, Memorandum for the Secretary of State, and Department of State Delegation of Authority No. 245-1, and with reference to the determinations set out in the Report to the Congress transmitted pursuant to section 603 of that Act, regarding the extent of noncompliance by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) or Palestinian Authority with certain commitments, I hereby impose the sanction set out in section 604(a)(2), “Downgrade in Status of the PLO Office in the United States.” This sanction is imposed for a period of 180 days from the date that the report under section 603 of the Act is transmitted to the Congress or until such time as the next report under section 603 is required to be transmitted to the Congress, whichever is later.

Furthermore, I hereby determine that it is in the national security interest of the United States to waive that sanction, pursuant to section 604(c) of the Act. This waiver shall be effective for a period of 180 days from the date hereof or until such time as the next report under section 603 of the Act is required to be transmitted to Congress, whichever is later.

                    This determination shall be reported to Congress promptly and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: August 10, 2011.

William J. Burns,

Deputy Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-21270 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0612 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TOMMY ESTEL SANSON II,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kelley A. Barstad is granted an extension of time to and including June 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2024

05/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0612
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.01-20 Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. ( a ) Officers in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), have been designated and delegated to perform, within each OCMI's jurisdiction, the following functions: Inspection of vessels in order to determine that they comply with the applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating to safe construction, equipment, manning, and operation and that they are in a seaworthy condition for the services in which they are operated; shipyard and factory inspections; the investigation of marine casualties and accidents; the licensing, certificating, shipment and discharge of seamen; the investigating and initiating of action in cases of misconduct, negligence, or incompetence of merchant marine officers or seamen; and the enforcement of vessel inspection, navigation, and seamen's laws in general. Specific procedures for appealing the decisions of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, or of his subordinates are set forth in 46 CFR parts 1 to 4.
( b ) The Commanding Officer of the National Maritime Center has been designated and delegated the same authority as an OCMI for the purpose of carrying out the following marine safety functions pursuant to the provisions of 46 CFR Subchapter B: ( 1 ) Licensing, credentialing, certificating, shipment and discharge of seamen;
( 2 ) Referring to the processing Regional Examination Center (REC), the Suspension and Revocation National Center of Expertise, or cognizant OCMI potential violations of law, negligence, misconduct, unskillfulness, incompetence or misbehavior of persons holding merchant mariner's documents, licenses, certificates or credentials issued by the Coast Guard, and recommending suspension or revocation under 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77 when deemed appropriate; and
( 3 ) Granting, withholding, suspending, or withdrawing course approvals.
[CGFR 48-72, 13 FR 9330, Dec. 31, 1948, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35525, June 30, 1998; USCG-2006-25535, 72 FR 7929, Feb. 22, 2007; USCG-2009-0314, 74 FR 30937, June 29, 2009]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT EARL REEVES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1322

[August 10, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562021CF001065AXXXXX.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Appendix D

Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual V1.6

52 pages follow

(Source: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 2

- vision

- plus/download )Page intentionally left blank
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 617 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of Eric Nord, cofounder of the Nordson Corporation, innovative businessman and engineer, and generous Ohio philanthropist. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2008 

Mr. BROWN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of 

Eric Nord, co-founder of the Nordson Corporation, innovative businessman and engineer, and generous Ohio philanthropist. 

Whereas Eric Nord, an Amherst, Ohio, native was born on 

November 8, 1917; 

Whereas Eric Nord graduated from Amherst High School in 

1935 and received a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering from the Case Institute of Technology, now 

known as Case Western Reserve University; 

Whereas Eric Nord co-founded Ohio-based Nordson Corporation with his father and brother; 

Whereas Eric Nord served as President of Nordson Corporation from 1954 to 1974, Chairman and CEO from 1974 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 617 IS 

to 1983, Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1983 

to 1997, and Chairman Emeritus from 1997 to 2008; 

Whereas Eric Nord was awarded 25 United States patents; 

Whereas Eric Nord oversaw the early growth of Nordson 

Corporation from a local business with less than 

$1,000,000 in annual sales to a multinational corporation 

with annual sales of $121,000,000; 

Whereas Eric Nord’s creativity and vision merited numerous 

honors and awards, including an honorary doctorate of 

science from Oberlin College and the Case Alumni Association Gold Medal Award in recognition of outstanding 

technical innovation, successful business management, 

and dedicated public service; 

Whereas Eric Nord established the Nord Family Foundation, 

the Nordson Corporation Foundation, the Community 

Foundation of Greater Lorain County, and the Eric and 

Jane Nord Foundation; 

Whereas the charitable work of Eric Nord contributed more 

than $100,000,000 to worthy causes; 

Whereas Eric Nord was a strong advocate for civil rights, 

fighting to establish fair housing practices for minorities 

in Oberlin, Ohio, during the 1960s; 

Whereas Eric Nord was a beloved member of the community, 

philanthropist, husband, and father; 

Whereas Eric Nord was an advocate for education, the arts, 

and social services; and 

Whereas Ohio has lost an exemplary citizen and innovator 

with the passing of Eric Nord on June 19, 2008: Now, 

therefore, be it 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 617 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life and recog2 nizes the accomplishments of Eric Nord, a civic-minded 

3 business leader, compassionate humanitarian, and dedi4 cated family man. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 99(b)

TXU Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC

Statement of Collection Account Balances as of

December 31, 2005

The
balances in the sub-accounts on deposit with the trustee as of December 31, 2005 were:



|                                  |  |               |               |               |   |              
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | - | -------------
|                                  |  | Series 2003-1 |               | Series 2004-1
|General Sub-Account               |  | $             | 26,952,635.32 |               | $ | 15,599,565.72
|Capital Sub-Account               |  | $             | 2,525,570.88  |               | $ | 420,182.80   
|Overcollateralization Sub-Account |  | $             | 420,695.58    |               | $ | 0.00         
|Reserve Sub-Account               |  | $             | 343,330.33    |               | $ | 0.00         

REP Deposit Account *    $2,149,060.93

---

|* | REP deposits are held in one account with a sub-ledger outlining the respective amount of each REPs deposit attributable to each series of bonds.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------