alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From:      Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US  

To:         "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>   

Cc:         Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA,  

Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,  

Wendy Blake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA    

Date:       04/13/2010 03:22 PM   

Subject:    RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM  

Hi Heidi,

Attached below is the draft baseline mercury emissions inventory for 112(c)(6).

Thanks.

Chuck

(See attached file: draft 112c6 summary for mercury 4‐12‐2010.xls)
Sl nerati 1 8000 1 01% 166 0 92 90%

                                    Draft ‐ Do Not Cite or Quote ‐ for Internal EPA Review ‐ 4/8/2010

Mercury Emissions Baseline Inventory for the Section 112(c)(6) Program 

Categories Subject to Existing MACT Standards 

Emissions 

(T/yr)

Percent of 

Total

Cumulative 

tons/yr

Cumulative 

Percent

Aerospace Industry (Major) 0.1000 0.06% 0.1 0.06%

Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (Major and Area) 9.8000 5.49% 9.9 5.54%

Hazardous Waste Incineration (Major and Area) 3.2000 1.79% 13.1 7.33%

Lightweight Aggregate Kilns (Major and Area) 0.3100 0.17% 13.4 7.51%

Portland Cement Manufacturing: Hazardous Waste Kilns (Major) 2.7500 1.54% 16.2 9.04%

Pulp and Paper – Kraft Recovery Furnaces (Major) 1.9000 1.06% 18.1 10.11%

Secondary Lead Smelting (Major and Area) 0.0113 0.01% 18.1 10.11%

Medical Waste Incinerators (Major and Area) 50.0000 27.98% 68.1 38.10%

Portland Cement: Non-Hazardous Waste Kilns (Major and Area) 5.6400 3.16% 73.7 41.26%

Municipal Waste Combustors (Major and Area) 55.0000 30.78% 128.7 72.04%

Electric Arc Furnaces (EAF) (Area) - Secondary Steel 7.8000 4.37% 136.5 76.41%

Categories Scheduled for MACT Standards in 2010

Gold Mines (Area) 4.4000 2.46% 140.9 78.87%

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers (Major Sources) 12.4800 6.99% 153.4 85.85%

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers (Area Sources that Burn 

Coal) 7.6910 4.30% 161.1 90.16%

Other Source Categories in Baseline Inventory

Blast Furnace & Steel Mills (Major) - Integ. Iron & Steel 3.1000 1.74% 164.2 91.89%

Sewage u Sldge Incineration nci 1.8000 1.01% 166.0 92.90%

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers (Area Sources that burn oil 

or biomass) 0.6100 0.34% 166.6 93.24%

Remaining 28 source categories in the baseline inventory combined 12.0750 6.76% 178.7 100.00%

Total 178.7 100.00%
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Phase II SBIR: “Develop CD-ROM Based Instrument Wizard”.                    

*Date:*                         June 28, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eric Zatman, Contract Review Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1438.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 31, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-14336  Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA, 

CARLOS LOPEZ,

MARIANA LOPEZ and

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., 

REINIER CORTES, AND 

ANDREA GONZALEZ QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ALLOW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE 

COURTROOM FOR USE DURING EACH DAY OF TRIAL

Plaintiffs, Delio Batista, Carlos Lopez, Mariana Lopez, and Rafaela Valiente, request the 

Court to enter an Order allowing them to bring electronic equipment in the Courtroom for use 

during each day of trial, which is scheduled to begin on Monday, July 10, 2023, at 8:30 a.m.,

before the Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga, at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States 

Courthouse 400 North Miami Avenue, Chambers 10-2, Miami, FL 33128. 

Plaintiffs request permission to utilize the following electronic devices for and during the 

trial of this cause: 

Owner Electronic Equipment

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Laptop w/ charging cord

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Laptop w/ charging cord

Delio Batista Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Carlos Lopez Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Mariana Lopez Cellular Phone w/charging cord

Rafaela Valiente Cellular Phone w/charging cord

WHEREFORE Plaintiffs, Delio Batista, Carlos Lopez, Mariana Lopez, and Rafaela 

Valiente, request the Court to enter an Order granting the relief requested herein. 

Respectfully submitted this 30th day of June 2023.

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. (174742)

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/30/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airborne, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl D. Donaway, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
enacted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Airborne, Inc. and will be retained by Airborne, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/    CARL D. DONAWAYCarl D. Donaway Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                 BEVERLY REISMAN
                               323 BETTY ANN DRIVE
                               WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO
                                     M2R 1B4

October 7, 2003

Red Brook Developments Limited
250 Lesmill Road
Don Mills, Ontario
M3B 2T5

Attention:  Mr. Elly Reisman

RE:  VISUAL BIBLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Dear Sirs:

      As previously agreed, enclosed please find my cheque in the amount of
twenty thousand United States dollars ($20,000.00USD), the ("cheque") for the
purchase of twenty thousand (20,000) A Units, (the "Purchased A Unites") of
Visual Bible International, Inc. ("VBI") that would have otherwise been issued
to Red Brook Developments Limited ("Red Brook") as part of Red Brook's
conversion of its Bridge Loans (as defined in the CP Agreement) pursuant to
Paragraph 4 of the Amended and Restated Red Brook Conditions Precedent
Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2003, among Red Brook, VBI and Maurice Colson
(the "CP Agreement"). The Bridge Loans are being converted as of today's date.

                                                          Yours truly,

                                                      /s/ Beverly Reisman
                                                      -------------------------
                                                          Beverly Reisman

Red Brook hereby acknowledges receipt of the cheque as payment for the Purchased
A Units as of this 7th day of October 2003.

/s/ Elly Reisman
-------------------------------
Red Brook Developments Limited
Gateway Tourist, Inc. P O BOX 642027, Los Ange||s CA 9006^-9998 

Tel: 213.413.3200 Fax; 213.413.2277 E-Mail: infoflWalewavlax.com 

Hours M-F 7 am-5:30 pm/Sat 8 am-1:30 pm/Closed Sun & Holidays 

ARC #05-668224 

February 24, 2010 

y > 

The Honorable Ray LaHood --'-^.•> 

Secretary , , Es! 

United States Department of Transportation j o 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE '=* 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and 

Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by 

U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and 

Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the 

world's largest financial and commerce centers. Recent events, including the successful 

preser\/ation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance membership, have underscored American's 

strong commitment to the trans-Pacifrc market. American is likewise committed to New York 

and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and 

education - providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s Both the New York and 

Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from these proposed new 

flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to make 

the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly 

from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

Satoshi Watanabe, 

General Manager / Owner
**EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C 1350In connection with the Quarterly Report of Akorn, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which thisCertification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does herebycertify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR240.13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 9, 2006       /s/ ARTHUR S. PRZYBYL     Arthur S. Przybyl    Chief Executive Officer
§ 158.135 Which ports and terminals must have Certificates of Adequacy? To continue to receive ships, a port or terminal must hold one or more Certificates of Adequacy to show compliance with— ( a ) Subpart B of this part if it receives oceangoing tankers, or any other oceangoing ship of 400 gross tons or more, carrying oily mixtures.
( b ) Subpart C of this part if it receives oceangoing ships carrying NLSs.
( c ) Subpart D of this part if it receives— ( 1 ) The ships under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) Fishing vessels which offload more than 500,000 pounds of commercial fishery products from all ships during a calendar year.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18408, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55574, Nov. 2, 2001]
§ 158.110 Applicability. ( a ) Subparts B, C, and E apply to each port and each terminal located in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States that is— ( 1 ) Used by oceangoing tankers, or any other oceangoing ships of 400 gross tons or more, carrying oily mixtures, or by oceangoing ships to transfer NLSs, except those ports and terminals that are used only by— ( i ) Tank barges that are not configured and are not equipped to ballast or wash cargo tanks while proceeding enroute;
( ii ) Ships carrying NLS operating under waivers under 46 CFR 153.491(b); or
( 2 ) A ship repair yard that services oceangoing ships carrying oil or NLS residue.
( b ) Subpart D applies to each port and terminal located in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18407, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55574, Nov. 2, 2001]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 51250 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

GILBERT MAURICIO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 1495

- 1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilbert Mauricio

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mauricio h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 6, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-51250 Document: 00514062388 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2017No. 16

- 51250

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-51250 Document: 00514062388 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2017
Exhibit 31(b)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Mark J. Thomas, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:March 15, 2006/s/ Mark J. Thomas   Mark J. Thomas   Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.322 Where must ring life buoys be located and how must they be stowed? ( a ) The operator must locate one ring life buoy on each side of the deepwater port and one near each external stairway leading to the water. One buoy per side may be used to satisfy both these requirements.
( b ) Each ring life buoy must be stowed on or in a rack that is readily accessible in an emergency. The ring life buoy must not be permanently secured in any way to the rack or the deepwater port.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39179, July 1, 2013]
§ 154.2010 Qualifications for acceptance as a certifying entity. To qualify for acceptance as a vapor control system (VCS) certifying entity, the entity must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commandant that it possesses the following minimum qualifications: ( a ) The ability to review and evaluate design drawings and failure analyses for compliance to this subpart;
( b ) The knowledge of the applicable regulations of this subpart, including the standards incorporated by reference;
( c ) The ability to monitor and evaluate test procedures and results for compliance with the operational requirements of this subpart;
( d ) The ability to perform inspections and observe tests of bulk liquid cargo-handling systems;
( e ) The applicant must not be controlled by an owner or operator of a vessel or facility engaged in controlling vapor emissions;
( f ) The applicant must not be dependent upon Coast Guard acceptance under this section to remain in business; and
( g ) The person in charge of VCS certification must be a licensed professional engineer in a U.S. State or territory. A person in charge of VCS certification who is not a licensed professional engineer on August 15, 2013 must obtain that license from a U.S. State or territory by August 15, 2014.
[USCG-1999-5150, 78 FR 42618, July 16, 2013, as amended by 80 FR 7540, Feb. 11, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         7,997,424
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  883,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    804,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,612,337
<PP&E>                                         2,779,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,381,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,272,971
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,065
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,751,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,381,114
<SALES>                                        1,458,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,458,912
<CGS>                                          266,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,820,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (403,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (403,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (403,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)



</TABLE>
(77 South. 1002)

#### BEAMAN v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY.

(3 Div. 313.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

H. B. Fuller, of Montgomery, for appellant. Warren E. Andrews, of Montgomery, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

Affirmed for want of assign.ment of error,