alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4794

To require the Secretary of the Interior to complete a resource study of

the 600 mile route through Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia,

used by George Washington and General Rochambeau during the American Revolutionary War.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. LARSON (for himself, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr.

SKELTON, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. WEINER, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. BORSKI, Mr.

WEYGAND, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. SMITH of

New Jersey, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. SHAYS,

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. MORAN of Virginia,

Mrs. KELLY, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. WYNN, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr.

CARDIN, Mr. DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. HOYER, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. SWEENEY, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN,

Mr. HOLT, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior to complete a resource study of the 600 mile route through Connecticut,

Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New

York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia, used

by George Washington and General Rochambeau during

the American Revolutionary War.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4794 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington-Rocham3 beau Revolutionary Route National Heritage Act of

4 2000’’.

5 SEC. 2. STUDY OF THE WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVO6 LUTIONARY ROUTE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the

8 date on which funds are made available to carry out this

9 section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on

10 Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the

11 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives,

12 a resource study of the 600 mile route through Con13 necticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jer14 sey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia,

15 used by George Washington and General Jean Baptiste

16 Donatien de Vimeur, comte de Rochambeau during the

17 American Revolutionary War.

18 (b) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study re19 quired by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with

20 State and local historic associations and societies, State

21 historic preservation agencies, and other appropriate orga22 nizations.

23 (c) CONTENTS.—The study shall—

24 (1) identify the full range of resources and his25 toric themes associated with the route referred to in
3

•HR 4794 IH

1 subsection (a), including its relationship to the

2 American Revolutionary War;

3 (2) identify alternatives for National Park Serv4 ice involvement with preservation and interpretation

5 of the route referred to in subsection (a); and

6 (3) include cost estimates for any necessary ac7 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and

8 maintenance associated with the alternatives identi9 fied pursuant to paragraph (2).

Æ
#### ROZIER *et al. v.*MANDLE.

When in a hill of exceptions “Samuel Mandle” individually was named as the defendant in error, and service of the bill of exceptions was acknowledged by “Samuel Mandle, per [B.] attorney,” and the record shows that the case in the court below, the same being the trial of an issue arising upon the interposition of a claim by Rozier to the levy of a mortgage fi. fa. in favor of Samuel Mandle, as administrator of Julius Mandle, proceeded in the name of “Samuel Mandle, administrator of Julius Mandle,” the variance is a substantial one; and, on motion of the defendant in error, the writ of error is dismissed.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided January 15, 1907.

Practice in the Supreme Court.

*T. M. Hunt,*for plaintiff in error. *W. H. Burwell,*contra.

' Beck, J.

This case is dismissed upon motion of defendant in error, for the reason set forth in the headnote. The ground upon *296which the ruling is based is not a mere technicality. The rulings of the court below, which'we are'asked to review, were made in the case of Samuel Mandle, administrator of Julius Mandle *v.*Susan Flagg, defendant in fi. fa., and H. F. & E. A. Rozier, claimants, which was a case arising from an issue made by the interposition of a claim by Rozier to the levy of a mortgage fi. fa. in favor of Samuel Mandle, administrator of Julius Mandle; but when the bill of exceptions was sued out, Samuel Mandle individually was named therein. No offer to amend the bill of exceptions so as to make it conform to the record was made; and even if it had been, it would not have availed the plaintiff in error as against a proper motion to dismiss, because there would then have been no service of the bill of exceptions as amended, inasmuch as the only service which is shown here was an acknowledgment of service by the attorney of Samuel Mandle individually; and this would have been no service at all upon the party named as defendant in error in the bill of exceptions, in case it was amended in the particular referred to. *Green*v. *Barron,*119 *Ga.*901.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
#### § 166.110 Modification of areas.

Fairways and fairway anchorages are subject to modification in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 70003.

[CGD 81-80a, 48 FR 30110, June 30, 1983, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58281, Sept. 18, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3442-3443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1426]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]


Regulations Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public 
Notice

January 14, 2000.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(h), of 
the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission 
decisional employees, who make or receive an exempt or a prohibited 
off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested on-
the-record proceeding, to deliver a copy of the communication, if 
written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication, to 
the Secretary.
    Prohibited communications will be included in a public, non-
decisional file associated with, but not part of, the decisional record 
of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited 
communication and any responses thereto should become part of the 
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not 
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a 
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or 
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may 
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and 
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant 
such requests only when it determines that fairness so requires.
    Exempt off-the-record communications will be included in the 
decisional record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with 
a cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR 
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of exempt and prohibited off-the-record 
communications received in the Office of the Secretary within the 
preceding 14 days. The documents may be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/

[[Page 3443]]

online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
    Exempt
    1. Project No. 696--12/3/99--Kit T. Mullen.
    2. Project No. 420-009--12/22/99--Steven Pennoyer.
    3. Project No. 2336-041--11/22/99--Jon Cofrancesco.
    4. Project No. 10865--12/15/99--Jeffery R. Soth.
    5. RM99-2-000, ER99-3144-000 and EC99-80-000--12/9/99--The 
Honorable Dennis J. Kucinich.
    6. CP00-6-000--12/15/99--Jo Lewis.
    7. CP99-44-000--12/22/99--Wayne Daltry.
    8. CP00-6-000--12/17/99--C.B. Shirey.
    9. Project Nos. 1975, 2061, 2777 and 2778--12/1/99--John Blair.
    10. CP00-14-000, CP00-15-000 and CP00-16-000--1/3/00--Kim Jessen.
    11. Project No. 2609-013--12/16/99--Tom Dean.
    12. Project No. 2609-013--1/6/00--Tom Dean.
    13. CP00-14-000--1/9/00--Mary Mosley.
    14. Project No. 420-009--12/30/99--Pamela Bergmann.
    15. Project No. 10865-001--12/22/99--Timothy Ballew, Sr.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1426 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350In connection with the Quarterly Report of Akorn, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which thisCertification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does herebycertify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR240.13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: May 9, 2007     /s/ JEFFREY A. WHITNELL   Jeffrey A. Whitnell  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35400-35401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13849]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Public Meeting; Federal Committee on Registered Apprenticeship

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, DOL.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. Law 92-463; 5 U.S.C. APP. 1), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Federal Committee on Registered Apprenticeship (FCRA).

Time and Date: The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, June 
15, 2000 and continue until approximately 5:00 p.m. The meeting will 
reconvene at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, June 16, 2000, and continue until 
approximately 12:00 noon.

Place: The Jefferson Room East of the Hilton Washington and Towers, 
1919 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Swoope, Administrator, 
Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, 
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 
N-4649, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. 
Telephone: (202) 219-5921 (this is not a toll-free number)

Matters to be Considered: The agenda will focus on the following 
topics:

(1) Reports on the FCRA Work Groups
    Marketing
    Quality
    Diversity
    Resources/Data
    Legislative

(2) Child Care Grants
(3) Discuss FCRA Recommendations
(4) Demonstration of apprenticeship Websites: Partnerships
(5) Progress Report on ATELS/BAT activities

[[Page 35401]]

(6) Next Meeting Dates and Location
(7) Public Comment

STATUS: Members of the public are invited to attend the proceedings. 
Individuals with disabilities should contact Marion Winters at (202) 
219-5921 no later than June 9, 2000, if special accommodations are 
needed.
    Any member of the public who wishes to file written data or 
comments pertaining to the agenda may do so by sending it to Mr. 
Anthony Swoope, Administrator, Office of Apprenticeship Training, 
Employer and Labor Services, Employment and Training Administration, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-4649, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20210. Such submissions should be sent by June 9, 
2000, to be included in the record for the meeting.
    Any member of the public who wishes to speak at the meeting should 
indicate the nature of the intended presentation and the amount of time 
needed by furnishing a written statement to the Designated Federal 
official by June 9. The Chairperson will announce at the beginning of 
the meeting the extent to which time will permit the granting of such 
requests.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., on May 26, 2000.
Raymond L. Bramucci,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training.
[FR Doc. 00-13849 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
```
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Thomas Banks, Chief Financial Officer of Lenco Mobile Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that:




1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Lenco Mobile Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b) [Reserved.]




c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: May 28, 2010




/s/    THOMAS BANKSThomas Banks, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Additional Guidance

															Home/Coalition of Federal Ombuds/Additional Guidance Additional GuidanceTyler Smith2022-07-11T16:20:53-04:00						**Additional Guidance**
**Federal Acquisition Regulations Ombuds (FAR)**
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Section 16.505, “Ordering,” requires that the head of the agency shall designate a task-order and delivery-order ombuds. The ombuds must review complaints from contractors, and ensure they are afforded a fair opportunity to be considered, consistent with the procedures in the contract. The ombuds must be a senior agency official who is independent of the contracting officer and may be the agency’s competition advocate.
NASA’s provides an example of how to implement their FAR Ombuds program in Subpart 1815.70—“Ombudsman” of their procurement procedures. They require that all synopses announcing competitive acquisitions and each contract and task order contain substantially the same clause found in Subpart 1852.215-84.
**Records**
All federal programs, even a federal Ombuds program, create records needed to document activities for which they are responsible and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the program. The National Archives and Records Administration’s (NARA), General Records Schedule 1, Civilian Personnel Records, Section 27, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) files contain general guidance on ARD record retention.
Ombuds should consult with their agency records officer and legal counsel when developing their record retention policy, and ensure any records retention procedures do not conflict with Ombuds confidentiality requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
**U.S. Government Accountability Office (U.S. GAO) Reports**
Alternative Dispute Resolution: Employers’ Experiences With ADR in the Workplace, GGD-97-157 – August 1997
Human Capital: The Role of the Ombudsmen in Dispute Resolution, GAO-01-466 – April 2001Coalition of Federal OmbudsCOFO Annual Conference
Information
Charter
COFO Executive Committee Charter
Leadership
Coalition History
Voting Membership
Standards & Foundational Documents
Prior Conferences & Meetings
Additional Guidance
Other Ombuds & ADR Organizations
ABA Ombuds Day 2024 Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62273

)

Under Contract No. W912DY-10-D-0034 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Lucas T. Hanback, Esq.

Richard M. Harris, Esq.

 Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, P.C.

 Washington DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Karen L. King Vanek, Esq.

Karl W. Kuhn, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntsville

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 4, 2020

DAVID D’ALESSANDRIS

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62273, Appeal of Siemens 

Government Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 5, 2020

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
E N V E J E C E R  S I N  L Í M I T E S :  M AY O  D E  2023
**Exhibit 32(d)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gulf Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Susan N. Story

Susan N. Story

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/P. C. Raymond

Philip C. Raymond

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                           |

 

 

Date:  November 6, 2008
Educating Consumers:

New Content on Diesel Vehicles, 

Diesel Exhaust Fluid, and Selective 

Catalytic Reduction Technologies 

on the AFDC

Debbie Brodt-Giles

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

DEER Conference 

August 5, 2008

NREL/PR-540-43803

Presented at the 14th Diesel Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research (DEER) 2008 Conference

held August 4-7, 2008 in Dearborn, Michigan.
What is the AFDC? 

Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center (AFDC)

Technology-focused Web site

Comprehensive alternative fuels and advanced vehicle 

information

Tools for the general public, fleets, educators, and consumers

 Alternative Fueling Station Locator

 Vehicle Search (alternative fuel and advanced)

 Cost/Emissions Calculators

 Laws and Incentives

 Publications Database

 Truck Stop Electrification Site Locator
AFDC: www.eere.energy.gov/afdc
Why Diesel Information? 

Light-duty diesels are ready to enter the marketplace

Fuel-efficiency improvements to light-duty diesels lead to 

reduced dependence on foreign oil

Some light- and heavy-duty vehicles will require diesel 

exhaust fluid (DEF), and consumers need to be trained 

on how to use it

Adding DEF information to the AFDC is a cooperative 

effort between:

 U.S. Department of Energy

 National Renewable Energy Laboratory

 Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
Diesel Information on the AFDC 

Content is located in the Diesel Vehicles section and 

includes links to relevant information

All vehicle classes are covered 

(light-, medium-, and heavy-duty)

Topics covered on the site include:

 Light-duty vehicle availability

Emissions

Selective catalytic reduction 

 DEF

 NOx traps
Diesel Vehicles Section
Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle Availability
Diesel Selective Catalytic Reduction
Diesel Exhaust Fluid 
Diesel Exhaust Fluid Locator (Still in development)
Plans for the DEF Locator

Application will run using Google Maps

Basic search will provide a quick search for most users’ 

needs

Advanced search will meet additional needs

 Will search by location type, access type, DEF 

dispenser type, vehicles serviced, and payment 

methods

Route-mapping capability will also be available
Example Map Output
Scheduled Release of DEF Locator

Some original equipment manufacturers (OEM) anticipate 

the public release of light-duty diesel vehicles utilizing DEF 

in fall 2008

General-educational portions of the Diesel Vehicles 

section went live in late July 2008

Diesel Exhaust Fluid Locator is due to go live early fall 

2008 in conjunction with the release of OEM light-duty 

diesel vehicles