alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 155.4010 Purpose of this subpart. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to establish vessel response plan *salvage* and *marine firefighting* requirements for vessels, that are carrying group I-IV oils, and that are required by §§ 155.1015 and 155.5015 to have a vessel response plan.
( b ) *Salvage* and *marine firefighting* actions can save lives and property, and prevent the escalation of potential oil spills to worst case discharge scenarios.
( c ) A planholder must ensure by *contract or other approved means* that response resources are available to respond. However, the response criteria specified in the regulations (e.g., quantities of response resources and their arrival times) are planning criteria, not performance standards, and are based on assumptions that may not exist during an actual incident, as stated in 33 CFR 155.1010. Compliance with the regulations is based upon whether a covered response plan ensures that adequate response resources are available, not on whether the actual performance of those response resources after an incident meets specified arrival times or other planning criteria. Failure to meet specified criteria during an actual spill response does not necessarily mean that the planning requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) (33 U.S.C. 1251-1376) and regulations were not met. The Coast Guard will exercise its enforcement discretion in light of all facts and circumstances.
[USCG-1998-3417, 73 FR 80649, Dec. 31, 2008, as amended by USCG-2008-1070, 78 FR 60123, Sept. 30, 2013]
#### § 155.1135 Response plan development and evaluation criteria.

For tankers subject to this subpart, the following response times must be used in determining the on-scene arrival time in Prince William Sound, for the response resources required by § 155.1050:

| | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Prince William Sound | 12 hrs | 24 hrs | 36 hrs |
Date

(mm/dd) Time

(HH:MM) Operator

Code Flow In (gal) Tur In

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal) count 0 0 hrs
DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0 0 Flow weighted average turbidity



### 0 Discharge during month of July Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond C System 1 PLC Data -July 2007Flow Out

(gpm) Tur Out

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal) Tur Rec

(NTU) pH Rec

0 NTU min 0.0 NTU max 0.0 Flow weighted average turbidity 0.0 pH min 0.00 pH max 0.00 Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond C System 1 PLC Data -July 2007

Av erage pressureDate

(mm/dd) Time

(HH:MM) Operator

Code Flow In (gal) Tur In

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal) count 0 0 hrs
DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0 0 Flow weighted average turbidity



### 0 Discharge during month of July Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond C System 2 PLC Data - July2007Flow Out

(gpm) Tur Out

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal) Tur Rec

(NTU) pH Rec

0 NTU min 0.0 NTU max 0.0 Flow weighted average turbidity 0.0 pH min 0.00 pH max 0.00 Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond C System 2 PLC Data - July2007

Av erage pressureDate

(mm/dd) Time

(HH:MM) Operator

Code Flow In (gal) Tur In

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal) Flow Out

(gpm) Tur Out

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal) Tur Rec

(NTU) pH Rec count 0 0 hrs
DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0 0 0 NTU min 0.0 NTU max 0.0 Flow weighted average turbidity 0.0 pH min 0.00 pH max 0.00
0 Discharge during month of July Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G System 1 PLC Data - July 2007

Average pressureDate

(mm/dd) Time

(HH:MM) Operator

Code Flow In (gal) Tur In

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal) count 0 4 0 hrs
DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0 0 Flow weighted average turbidity



### 0 Discharge during month of July Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G System 2 PLC Data -July 2007Flow Out

(gpm) Tur Out

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal) Tur Rec

(NTU) pH Rec

0 NTU min 0.0 NTU max 0.0 Flow weighted average turbidity 0.0 pH min 0.00 pH max 0.00 Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G System 2 PLC Data -July 2007

Av erage pressureDate

(mm/dd) Time

(HH:MM) Operator

Code Flow In (gal) Tur In

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal) count 0 0 hrs
DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0 0 Flow weighted average turbidity



### 0 Discharge during month of July Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G System 3 PLC Data - July 2007Flow Out

(gpm) Tur Out

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal) Tur Rec

(NTU) pH Rec Press In (PSI) 0
0 NTU min 0.0 NTU max 0.0 Flow weighted average turbidity 0.0 pH min 0.00 pH max 0.00 Av erage pressure Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G System 3 PLC Data - July 2007Press

Out (PSI)  P

(PSI) 0 0
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

          - 49 CFR Parts 350, 390, 394, 395, and 398 
          - RIN 2126-AA23

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                            This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule published in the                             **Federal Register**                             of May 2, 2000, regarding Hours of Service of Drivers and Driver Rest and Sleep for Safe Operations. This correction removes a statement included by error that the proposed rule would                             *not*                             have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As we stated in the proposed rule, the FMCSA does not know with certainty the full economic impact of the proposal and therefore withdraws its negative certification.                        

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. David Miller, (202) 366-1790.

## Correction

In proposed rule FR Doc. 00-10703, beginning on 25540 in the issue of May 2, 2000, make the following correction in the Supplementary Information section. On page 25596 in column three, remove the second full paragraph that reads:

“Therefore, the FMCSA, in compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), has considered the economic impacts of these requirements on small entities and certifies that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.”

Authority:49 U.S.C. 504, 14122, 31133, 31136, and 31502; sec. 113, Pub. L. 103-311, 108 Stat. 1673, 1676; and 49 CFR 1.73.

Issued on: May 26, 2000.

Julie Anna Cirillo, 

Acting Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 00-13790  Filed 5-30-00; 9:12 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 461 

Designating March 1, 2008, as ‘‘World Friendship Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2008 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 1, 2008, as ‘‘World Friendship Day’’. 

Whereas it should be the goal of all Americans to promote 

international understanding and good will; 

Whereas personal friendships among individual citizens can 

foster greater understanding among nations and cultures; 

Whereas people all over the world have travelled or opened 

their homes as hosts in order to promote international 

understanding; 

Whereas nonprofit organizations such as Friendship Force 

International, which was founded in Atlanta, Georgia, in 

1977, have helped to promote such international exchanges; 

Whereas, today, there are more than 35,000 members of 

Friendship Force International in 40 States and 58 forVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:05 Feb 27, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR461.IS SR461

smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 461 IS 

eign countries who are building bridges across the cultural barriers that separate people; and 

Whereas, in order to celebrate on an annual basis the cause 

of peace through international understanding, March 1, 

2008, should be recognized as World Friendship Day: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors those who promote international un3 derstanding and good will in the world; and 

4 (2) designates March 1, 2008, as ‘‘World 

5 Friendship Day’’, and asks people everywhere to 

6 mark and celebrate the day appropriately. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________________

No. 11-12305

_____________________________

D. C. Docket No. 2:08-cv-00276-VEH

MARJAN VAKILI, and

FAITH PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CHARLES F. STEPHENSON,

BROOKESTONE PLACE, LLC,

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________________________

(July 25, 2012)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, and RESTANI ,*

Judge.

 Honorable Jane A. Restani, United State Court of International Trade Judge, sitting by 

*

designation.

Case: 11-12305 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
PER CURIAM:

This state-law diversity case arises out of the defendants’ attempts to collect

debts owed by Kevin Vakili. Plaintiffs Marjan Vakili (Mr. Vakili’s wife) and

Faith Properties sued several defendants: Appellees Charles F. Stephenson,

Providence Place, LLC, and Brookestone Place, LLC (“Defendants”); and two

non-Appellee defendants. Plaintiffs claimed, among other things, that the

Stephenson Parties violated Alabama law by wrongfully foreclosing on some of

the Vakilis’ properties. Defendants cross- and counterclaimed, alleging that

Plaintiffs and Mr. Vakili (who had been joined as a third-party defendant, along

with Sina Jashfar, Mrs. Vakili’s son) fraudulently transferred property to avoid

Mr. Vakili’s creditors. 

After discovery, the district court granted Defendants’ motion for summary

judgment and dismissed with prejudice all claims brought by Plaintiffs against

Defendants. The district court entered final judgment in favor of Defendants and

charged attorney’s fees and costs to Plaintiffs, plus Mr. Vakili and Mr. Jashfar. 

From a study of the case, including the oral arguments made to us, we conclude

that no reversible error has been presented.

2

Case: 11-12305 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
Plaintiffs and Mr. Vakili ask the Court to reverse three of the district 1

court’s decisions in this case: (1) the grant of summary judgment for Defendants

because the “unclean hands” doctrine barred Plaintiffs from seeking equitable

relief; (2) an order compelling production of certain communications between the

Vakilis and their lawyer; and (3) the award under the Alabama Litigation

Accountability Act of attorney’s fees and costs to Defendants.

We affirm all of the appealed-from decisions of the district court: the district

court did not abuse its discretion by applying the “unclean hands” doctrine, the

district court did not abuse its discretion by compelling production of the attorneyclient communications, and the district court made no error in charging attorney’s

fees and costs to Plaintiffs and to Mr. Vakili for claims and defenses asserted

without substantial justification.

AFFIRMED.

 The Notice of Appeal and other documents filed with the Court establish that Mr. Jashfar

1

did not appeal the district court’s decisions.

3

Case: 11-12305 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
Company);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e)
for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions abut the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information and have identified for the registrants auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Douglas J. Leech
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 450 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 450

     Designating July 26, 2008, as ``National Day of the Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2008

Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Allard, Mr. Craig, Mr. Crapo, 
 Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Inhofe, Mrs. 
   Murray, Mr. Reid, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Martinez, and Mr. 
Johnson) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating July 26, 2008, as ``National Day of the Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ``cowboys'', helped establish 
        the American West;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, sound family 
        values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, geographic 
        boundaries, and political affiliations;
Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and its creatures, who 
        lives off of the land and works to protect and enhance the environment;
Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations;
Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the economy through the 
        work of approximately 727,000 ranchers in all 50 of the United States 
        that contribute to the economic well-being of nearly every county in the 
        Nation;
Whereas annual attendance at professional and working ranch rodeo events exceeds 
        27,000,000 fans and rodeo is the 7th most-watched sport in the Nation;
Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that 
        promote and encompass the livelihood of a cowboy span every generation 
        and transcend race and gender;
Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and music and 
        occupies a central place in the public imagination;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and cowgirls to their 
        communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 26, 2008, as ``National Day of the 
        Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.1**

**SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST**

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(dollars in thousands)
| ** **                              | ** ** | **Six Months Ended June 30,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                              | ** ** | **2006**                                          | ** ** | **2005**                                   | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                               |       |                                              |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                              |       | $                                                 | 28,353     |                                       | $          | 28,889 |   | $ | 58,705 |   | $ | 56,742 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   |
| Fixed charges                           |       | 22,917                                            |       | 22,675                                     |       | 46,633 |   | 41,836 |   | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   |
| Adjusted earnings                       |       | $                                                 | 51,270     |                                       | $          | 51,564 |   | $ | 105,338 |   | $ | 98,578 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   |
|                                    |       |                                              |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                          |       |                                              |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                        |       | $                                                 | 22,917     |                                       | $          | 22,675 |   | $ | 46,633 |   | $ | 41,836 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |       | 2.2x                                              |       | 2.3x                                       |       | 2.3x |   | 2.4x |   | 2.2x |   | 2.7x |   | 3.3x |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

I, Joachim J. Brown,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

 

# 1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofFirst Ottawa Bancshares, Inc.;

#  

# 2.               Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;

#  

# 3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in the Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

#  

# 4.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:

##  

## a.               designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

##  

## b.              evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

##  

## c.               presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

# 5.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

##  

## a.               all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

##  

## b.              any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

# 6.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to date of their evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.

 
| Date:  March 29, 2004 |
|----------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Joachim J. Brown |
|                       | Joachim J. Brown |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----