alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  February 9, 2009
    /s/ Lynn R. BlodgettLynn R. Blodgett, President andChief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc.
§ 110.147 New London Harbor, Conn. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds* — ( 1 ) *Anchorage A.* In the Thames River east of Shaw Cove, bounded by lines connecting points which are the following bearings and distances from Monument, Groton (latitude 41°21′18′′ N., longitude 72°04′48′′ W.): 243°, 1,400 yards; 246°, 925 yards; 217°, 1,380 yards; and 235°, 1,450 yards.
( 2 ) *Anchorage B.* In the Thames River southward of New London, bounded by lines connecting points which are the following bearings and distances from New London Harbor Light (latitude 41°18′59′′ N., longitude 72°05′25′′ W.): 002°, 2,460 yards; 009°, 2,480 yards; 026°, 1,175 yards; and 008°, 1,075 yards.
( 3 ) *Anchorage C.* In the Thames River southward of New London Harbor, bounded by lines connecting a point bearing 100°, 450 yards from New London Harbor Light, a point bearing 270°, 575 yards from New London Ledge Light (latitude 41°18′21′′ N., longitude 72°04′41′′ W.), and a point bearing 270°, 1,450 yards from New London Ledge Light.
( 4 ) *Anchorage D.* In Long Island Sound approximately two miles west-southwest of New London Ledge Light, bounded by lines connecting points which are the following bearings and distances from New London Ledge Light: 246°, 2.6 miles; 247°, 2.1 miles; 233°, 2.1 miles; and 235°, 2.6 miles.
( 5 ) *Anchorage E.* The waters at the mouth of New London Harbor one mile southeast of New London Ledge Light beginning at latitude 41°17′26′′ N., longitude 72°04′21′′ W.; thence northeasterly to latitude 41°17′38′′ N., longitude 72°03′54′′ W.; thence southeasterly to latitude 41°16′50′′ N., longitude 72°03′16′′ W.; and thence southwesterly to latitude 41°16′38′′ N. longitude 72°03′43′′ W.; and thence northwesterly to the point of beginning.
( 6 ) *Anchorage F.* The waters off the mouth of New London Harbor two miles southeast of New London Ledge Light beginning at latitude 41°16′00′′ N., longitude 72°03′13′′ W.; thence westerly to latitude 41°16′00′′ N., longitude 72°03′38′′ W.; thence northerly to latitude 41°16′35′′ N., longitude 72°03′38′′ W.; thence easterly to latitude 41°16′35′′ N., longitude 72°03′13′′ W.; and thence southerly to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Anchorage A is for barges and small vessels drawing less than 12 feet.
( 2 ) Anchorage F is reserved for the use of naval vessels and, except in cases of emergency, no other vessel may anchor in Anchorage F without permission from the Captain of the Port, New London, CT.
( 3 ) Except in emergencies, vessels shall not anchor in New London Harbor or the approaches thereto outside the anchorages defined in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port.
[CGD3-80-4A, 46 FR 48193, Oct. 1, 1981, as amended by CGD3 85-56, 51 FR 32318, Sept. 11, 1986]
NO. 07-05-0405-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 19, 2006

______________________________

ROGER DOUGLAS PHELPS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY;

NO. F-2004-1887-E; HONORABLE LEE GABRIEL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his

attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal. Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
PUBLIC LAW 106–548—DEC. 19, 2000 114 STAT. 2741

Public Law 106–548

106th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the town of Dolores, Colorado,

the current site of the Joe Rowell Park.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF JOE ROWELL PARK.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall convey

to the town of Dolores, Colorado, for no consideration, all right,

title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of

real property described in subsection (b), for open space, park,

and recreational purposes.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The property referred to in subsection

(a) is a parcel of approximately 25 acres of land comprising

the site of the Joe Rowell Park (including all improvements

on the land and equipment and other items of personal property

as agreed to by the Secretary) depicted on the map entitled

‘‘Joe Rowell Park’’, dated July 12, 2000.

(2) SURVEY.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a)

shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.

(B) COST.—As a condition of any conveyance under

this section, the town of Dolores shall pay the cost of

the survey.

(c) POSSIBILITY OF REVERTER.—Title to any real property

acquired by the town of Dolores, Colorado, under this section shall

revert to the United States if the town—

(1) attempts to convey or otherwise transfer ownership

of any portion of the property to any other person;

(2) attempts to encumber the title of the property; or

(3) permits the use of any portion of the property for

any purpose incompatible with the purpose described in subsection (a) for which the property is conveyed.

Dec. 19, 2000

[S. 1972]

114 STAT. 2742 PUBLIC LAW 106–548—DEC. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1972:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–375 (Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Nov. 13, Dec. 4, considered and passed House.

Æ

(d) MAP.—The map referenced in subsection (b)(1) shall be

on file for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest

Service at the Department of Agriculture in Washington, DC.

Approved December 19, 2000.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 00N-0002]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Application for Exemption From Federal Preemption of State 
and Local Medical Device Requirements

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Application for Exemption From 
Federal Preemption of State and Local Medical Device Requirements'' has 
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of April 13, 2000 
(65 FR 19915), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0129. 
The approval expires on May 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: May 26, 2000.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 00-13742 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### § 158.176 Effect of suspension of a Certificate of Adequacy.

After the COTP notifies the person in charge and places a suspension order in effect, the COTP denies entry of ships to the port or terminal while the Certificate of Adequacy is suspended.
First Name Last Name Agent Exchange ID Policy Number Commission

ELMER LOPEZ Mariana 4957516 12227062201 $ 15.00

YESSI ROMERO Mariana 5196901 12227068401 $ 15.00

EMERSON LOPEZ Mariana 5932620 12227068402 $ 15.00

CESAR SILVA FERNANDEZ Mariana 13639920 12227185601 $ 15.00

CARMEN CRUZ Mariana 12981867 12227871901 $ 15.00

BESSY SEVILLA Mariana 12840255 12227878301 $ 15.00

YEISON SEVILLA Mariana 13714465 12227878302 $ 15.00

DAVID RIVERA Mariana 12969819 12227891201 $ 15.00

ARACELI ESCOBAR Mariana 13036074 12227927601 $ 15.00

WALESKA MARTINEZ Mariana 13825432 12228254801 $ 15.00

COSME RAMIREZ Mariana 12688894 12228254802 $ 15.00

ANGELICA VILLA REAL Mariana 5138443 12244205801 $ 15.00

JULIO TORRES Mariana 13029315 12248494701 $ 15.00

GREITCHEN VELEZ PEREZ Mariana 14495117 12265714401 $ 15.00

HENRY MEDINA Mariana 13932041 12265726001 $ 15.00

MIGUEL MEDINA Mariana 13932041 12265726002 $ 15.00

KAHOMA ESCALANTE Mariana 13932041 12265726003 $ 15.00

FERNANDO ZERMENO Mariana 2298000 12297889701 $ 15.00

JUAN BLAYAS Mariana 14757726 12297920201 $ 15.00

$ 285.00

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 117-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31(c)1**

**GEORGIA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Michael D. Garrett, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 3, 2006

/s/Michael D. Garrett

Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


Mercury
General Corporation:





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (No. 333-62228) on Form S-3 and (Nos.
333-01583 and 333-125460) on Form S-8 of Mercury General Corporation of our
reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Mercury General Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, comprehensive
(loss) income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2008, and all related financial statement schedules, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K/A
of Mercury General Corporation.





Our report on the consolidated
financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption of the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, as of January 1, 2008.




/s/ KPMG
LLP





Los
Angeles, California


March 13,
2009
#### Cochran *et al. v.*Waits, Johnson & Company.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Bartlett. Polk superior court. March 13, 1906.

*Mundy & Mundy,*for plaintiffs.

*John K. Davis*and *H. TL. Carpenter,*for defendants.

Fish, C. J.

1. A landlord’s special lien for rent upon the crop grown, upon the rented premises takes effect upon the maturity of the crop, and his special lien upon such crop for supplies furnished to make the-same arises, by mere operation of law, when such supplies are furnished. ■ In neither case is a levy necessary in order to fix the lien upon the crop. Civil Code, §§2795, 2796, 2800, par. 1.

2. Such special liens being superior to older common-law judgments obtained against the tenant (Civil Code, §§2795, 2800, par. 6), if agricultural products upon .which such liens exist are levied upon under such, judgments, and the landlord thereupon duly forecloses these liens and. places the lien executions in the hands of the levying officer, to be levied upon such property, and such products are sold by the levying officer under the common-law executions, without the 'fi. fas. issued upon the-foreclosure proceedings of the landlord having been levied upon them,, the money arising from such sale in the hands of the levying officer is. subject to such special liens, and, in a rule against such officer to distribute the same, they will take precedence over the judgments upon which the executions under which the property was sold were based.

3. Therefore if, in such a case, a rule to distribute the money in the hands-of the levying officer is pending at the instance of the owner of the: common-law fi. fas., the landlord is not entitled to an injunction to-prevent such money from being applied toward the satisfaction of such executions, even though the tenant be insolvent and the landlord ivithoutreeourse for the collection of his claims other than upon such funds.

4. The fact, in the present case, that the common-law executions against the-tenant had been also levied upon personal property other than the crops, raised upon the rented premises, to which property the landlord had. filed a claim, afforded no reason for equity to interpose for the purpose-of consolidating the claim case thus made with the controversy between the same parties over the funds realized from the sale of such-, crops under these fi. fas.

5. There was no error in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the .Justices concur.*
§ 175.23 Serviceable condition. A PFD is considered to be in serviceable condition for purposes of § 175.21(a) only if the following conditions are met: ( a ) No PFD may exhibit deterioration that could diminish the performance of the PFD, including— ( 1 ) Metal or plastic hardware used to secure the PFD on the wearer that is broken, deformed, or weakened by corrosion;
( 2 ) Webbings or straps used to secure the PFD on the wearer that are ripped, torn, or which have become separated from an attachment point on the PFD; or
( 3 ) Any other rotted or deteriorated structural component that fails when tugged.
( b ) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, no inherently buoyant PFD, including the inherently buoyant components of a hybrid inflatable PFD, may exhibit— ( 1 ) Rips, tears, or open seams in fabric or coatings, that are large enough to allow the loss of buoyant material;
( 2 ) Buoyant material that has become hardened, non-resilient, permanently compressed, waterlogged, oil-soaked, or which shows evidence of fungus or mildew; or
( 3 ) Loss of buoyant material or buoyant material that is not securely held in position.
( c ) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, an inflatable PFD, including the inflatable components of a hybrid inflatable PFD, must be equipped with— ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, a properly armed inflation mechanism, complete with a full inflation medium cartridge and all status indicators showing that the inflation mechanism is properly armed;
( 2 ) Inflatable chambers that are all capable of holding air;
( 3 ) Oral inflation tubes that are not blocked, detached, or broken;
( 4 ) A manual inflation lanyard or lever that is not inaccessible, broken, or missing; and
( 5 ) Inflator status indicators that are not broken or otherwise non-functional.
( d ) The inflation system of an inflatable PFD need not be armed when the PFD is worn inflated and otherwise meets the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section.
[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.165 Regulated Navigation Area; Hudson River South of the Troy Locks, NY. ( a ) *Regulated navigation area.* All navigable waters of the Hudson River south of the Troy Locks.
( b ) *Definitions.* The following definitions apply to this section: ( 1 ) *Designated representative* means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or a Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) New York.
( 2 ) *Horsepower (HP)* means the total maximum continuous shaft horsepower of all the vessel's main propulsion machinery.
( c ) *Applicability.* This section applies to tugs with less than 3,000 horsepower when engaged in towing operations.
( d ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, vessels less than 3,000 horsepower while engaged in towing operations are not authorized to transit that portion of the Hudson River south of the Troy Locks when ice thickness on average is eight inches or greater.
( 2 ) All Coast Guard assets enforcing this Regulated Navigation Area can be contacted on VHF marine band radio, channel 13 or 16. The COTP can be contacted at (718) 354-4356, and the public may contact the COTP to suggest changes or improvements in the terms of this Regulated Navigation Area.
( 3 ) All persons desiring to transit through a portion of the regulated area that has operating restrictions in effect must contact the COTP at telephone number (718) 354-4356 or on VHF channel 13 or 16 to seek permission prior to transiting the affected regulated area.
( 4 ) The COTP will notify the public of any changes in the status of this Regulated Navigation Area by Marine Safety Information Broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio, channel 22A (157.1 MHZ).
[USCG-2010-0794, 76 FR 8656, Feb. 15, 2011]
# ToC

A-10 Other Ombudsman Activities by State

A-10 Other Ombudsman Activities by Region

# Other Activities by State

Table of Contents

# Other Activities by Region

Table of Contents
Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Stereo Vision Entertainment on Form
     10-KSB for the period  ending June 30, 2002,  as filed with the  Securities
     and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John Honour,
     Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
     18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ John Honour
John Honour
Chief Executive Officer
October 8, 2002



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------




We have issued our report dated September 26, 2002 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of FinancialContent, Inc., (f/k/a Cosmoz Infrastructure
Solutions, Inc.), (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,
2002 and 2001 which is included in this Registration Statement. We consent to
the inclusion of our report in this Registration Statement.


//s// Pohl, McNabola, Berg, & Company LLP

Pohl, McNabola, Berg & Company LLP


San Francisco, California
October 13, 2002
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.106 Security Zone: Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant, Seabrook, New Hampshire. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: All land and waters within 250 yards of the waterside property boundary of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant identified as follows: beginning at position 42°53′58′′ N, 070°51′06′′ W then running along the property boundaries of Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant to position 42°53′46′′ N, 070°51′06′′ W. All coordinates reference 1983 North American Datum (NAD 83).
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.33 of this part, entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Portland, Maine (COTP).
( 2 ) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Portland, Maine or designated on-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel. On-scene Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, state and federal law enforcement vessels.
( 3 ) No person may swim upon or below the surface of the water within the boundaries of this security zone.
[CGD01-02-092, 67 FR 64815, Oct. 22, 2002]