17088 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 59 / Thursday, March 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves establishing a safety zone 

for a fireworks display launch site and 

fallout area and is expected to have no 

impact on the water or environment. 

This zone is designed to protect 

mariners and spectators from the 

hazards associated with aerial fireworks 

displays. This rule is categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph 34 (g) of Figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. At § 165.506, in the Table to 

§ 165.506, make the following 

amendments: 

■ a. Under ‘‘(d) Coast Guard Sector 

North Carolina—COTP Zone,’’ suspend 

entry 2, from 5:30 p.m. on July 4, 2014 

to 1 a.m. on July 5, 2015. 

■ b. Under, ‘‘(d) Coast Guard Sector 

North Carolina—COTP Zone,’’ add entry 

15, which will be enforced from 5:30 

p.m. on July 4, 2014 to 1 a.m. on July 

5, 2014, to read as follows: 

§ 165.506–T05–0148 Safety Zones; Fifth 

Coast Guard District Fireworks Displays, 

Cape Fear River, Wilmington, NC. 

* * * * * 

No. Date Location Regulated area 

(d) Coast Guard Sector North Carolina—COTP Zone 

*******

15 ................ July 4–5, 2014 ... Cape Fear River, Wilmington, NC, 

Safety Zone.

All waters of the Cape Fear River within a 300 yard radius of the fireworks launch barge in approximate position latitude 34°14′17′′ N longitude 077°57′11′′. 

Dated: March 16, 2014. 

S.R. Murtagh, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06837 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 51 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0775; FRL–9906–72– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AR92 

Air Quality: Revision to the Regulatory 

Definition of Volatile Organic 

Compounds—Exclusion of 2-amino-2- 

methyl-1-propanol (AMP) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to revise the 

regulatory definition of volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs) under the Clean Air 

Act (CAA). This proposed revision 

would add 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol (also known as AMP; CAS 

number 124–68–5) to the list of 

compounds excluded from the 

regulatory definition of VOCs on the 

basis that this compound makes a 

negligible contribution to tropospheric 

ozone formation. In the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register, we are making this same 

amendment as a direct final rule 

without a prior proposed rule. If we 

receive no adverse comment, we will 

not take further action on this proposed 

rule. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 27, 2014. 

Public Hearing: If anyone contacts the 

EPA requesting a public hearing 

concerning the proposed regulation by 

April 11, 2014, we will hold a public 

hearing on April 28, 2014. If a public 

hearing is held, it will be held at 10 a.m. 

at Building C on the EPA campus in 

Research Triangle Park, NC, or at an 

alternate site nearby. Please refer to 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for 

additional information on the comment 

period and the public hearing. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2013–0775, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Follow the on-line instructions for 

submitting comments: 

www.regulations.gov. 

• Email: a-and-r-Docket@

epamail.epa.gov, Attention Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0775. 

• Fax: 202–566–9744, Attention 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013– 

0775. 

• Mail: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2013–0775, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mail Code: 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

1301 Constitution Avenue NW., William 

Jefferson Clinton West Building, Room: 

3334, Mail Code: 28221T, Washington, 

DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0775. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013– 

0775. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov, 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov, 

your email address will be 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 59 / Thursday, March 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules 17089 

1 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) is also 

known as Isobutanolamine and CAS No. 124–68– 

5. 

automatically captured and included as 

part of the comment that is placed in the 

public docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption and be free of any 

defects or viruses. For additional 

information about the EPA’s public 

docket, visit the EPA Docket Center 

homepage at http://www.epa.gov/

epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013– 

0775, EPA/DC, William Jefferson 

Clinton West Building, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. The Public Reading 

Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 

566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Souad Benromdhane, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, Health 

and Environmental Impacts Division, 

Mail Code C539–07, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711; telephone: (919) 541– 

4359; fax number: (919) 541–5315; 

email address: benromdhane.souad@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. General Information 

A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? 

B. Where can I get a copy of this document 

and other related information? 

C. What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for the EPA? 

D. How can I find information about a 

possible public hearing? 

II. Proposed Rule 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

To Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

I. General Information 

A. Why is the EPA using a direct final 

rule? 

We are publishing a direct final rule 

in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section 

of this Federal Register because we 

view this action as a noncontroversial 

action and anticipate no adverse 

comment. 

B. Where can I get a copy of this 

document and other related 

information? 

In addition to being available in the 

docket, an electronic copy of this 

proposal will also be available on the 

World Wide Web. Following signature 

by the EPA Administrator, a copy of this 

action will be posted on the EPA’s Web 

site www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/new/html. 

C. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for the EPA? 

Submitting CBI: Do not submit this 

information to the EPA through 

www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to the EPA, mark the outside 

of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

D. How can I find information about a 

possible public hearing? 

Public Hearing: If anyone contacts the 

EPA requesting to present oral 

testimony at a public hearing 

concerning the proposed regulation by 

April 11, 2014, we will hold a public 

hearing on April 28, 2014. If a public 

hearing is held, it will be held at 10 a.m. 

at Building C on the EPA campus in 

Research Triangle Park, NC, or at an 

alternate site nearby. Persons interested 

in presenting oral testimony must 

contact Sherry Russell, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, Health 

and Environmental Impacts Division, 

Mail Code C504–02, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711; telephone: (919) 541– 

0306; fax number: (919) 541–2464; 

email address: russell.sherry@epa.gov, 

no later than April 11, 2014. Persons 

interested in attending the public 

hearing if one is held must also call Ms. 

Russell to verify the time, date and 

location of the hearing. If no one 

contacts Ms. Russell by April 11, 2014 

with a request to present oral testimony 

at the hearing, we will cancel the 

hearing. To find out if a hearing has 

been requested, please check the EPA’s 

Web site www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/new/

html for further information, or contact 

Ms. Sherry Russell at russell.sherry@

epa.gov. 

II. Proposed Rule 

This proposed action would revise the 

EPA’s regulatory definition of VOCs for 

purposes of preparing SIPs to attain the 

NAAQS for ozone under title I of the 

CAA, by adding AMP to the list of 

compounds excluded from the 

regulatory definition of VOCs on the 

basis that this compound makes a 

negligible contribution to tropospheric 

ozone formation.1 We have explained 

our reasons for this action in the 

preamble to the direct final rule. The 

regulatory text for the proposal is 

identical to that for the direct final rule 

published in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register. For further supplementary 

information, the detailed rationale for 

the proposal and the regulatory 

revisions, see the direct final rule 

published under ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ of this Federal Register. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will withdraw the direct 

final rule, and take further action on this 

proposed rule. We would address all 

public comments in any subsequent 

final rule based on this proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
17090 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 59 / Thursday, March 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

information, please see the information 

in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993), and is therefore not 

subject to review under Executive 

Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is 

defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). It does not 

contain any recordkeeping or reporting 

requirement. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the proposed rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small entities include small businesses, 

small organizations and small 

governmental jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impacts 

of this notice on small entities, small 

entity is defined as: (1) A small business 

that is a small industrial entity as 

defined in the U.S. Small Business 

Administration (SBA) size standards. 

(See 13 CFR 121.); (2) A governmental 

jurisdiction that is a government of a 

city, county, town, school district or 

special district with a population of less 

than 50,000; and (3) A small 

organization that is any not-for-profit 

enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of today’s proposed rule on 

small entities, I certify that this action 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. In determining whether a rule 

has a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

impact of concern is any significant 

adverse economic impact on small 

entities, since the primary purpose of 

the regulatory flexibility analyses is to 

identify and address regulatory 

alternatives ‘‘which minimize any 

significant economic impact of the rule 

on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 

Thus, an agency may certify that a rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities if the rule relieves regulatory 

burden, or otherwise has a positive 

economic effect on all of the small 

entities subject to the rule. This 

proposed rule would remove AMP from 

the regulatory definition of VOCs and 

thereby relieve users of the compound 

from requirements to control emissions 

of the compound. We have therefore 

concluded that today’s proposed rule 

would relieve regulatory burden for all 

affected small entities. We continue to 

be interested in the potential impacts of 

the proposed rule on small entities and 

welcome comments on issues related to 

such impacts. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This action contains no federal 

mandates under the provisions of Title 

II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 

Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531– 

1538 for state, local or tribal 

governments or the private sector. The 

action imposes no enforceable duty on 

any state, local or tribal governments or 

the private sector. Therefore, this action 

is not subject to the requirements of 

sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. 

This action is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. This 

proposed rule would remove AMP from 

the regulatory definition of VOCs and 

thereby relieve users of the compound 

from requirements to control emissions 

of the compound. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This proposed 

rule would remove AMP from the 

regulatory definition of VOCs and 

thereby relieve users of the compound 

from requirements to control emissions 

of the compound. Thus, Executive 

Order 13132 does not apply to this rule. 

In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, 

and consistent with the EPA policy to 

promote communications between the 

EPA and state and local governments, 

the EPA specifically solicits comment 

on this proposed rule from state and 

local officials. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). It would not have substantial 

direct effects on tribal governments, on 

the relationship between the federal 

government and Indian tribes or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the federal 

government and Indian tribes, as 

specified in Executive Order 13175. 

This proposed rule would remove AMP 

from the regulatory definition of VOCs 

and thereby relieve users of the 

compound from requirements to control 

emissions of the compound. Thus, 

Executive Order 13175 does not apply 

to this rule. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

This action is not subject to EO 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because 

it is not economically significant as 

defined in EO 12866. While this 

proposed rule is not subject to the 

Executive Order, the EPA has reason to 

believe that at higher concentrations 

ozone has a disproportionate effect on 

active children who play outdoors (62 

FR 38856; 38859, July 18, 1997). The 

EPA has not identified any specific 

studies on whether or to what extent 

AMP may affect children’s health. The 

public is invited to submit comments or 

identify peer-reviewed studies and data, 

of which the EPA may not be aware, 

that assess results of early life exposure 

to the chemical compound herein. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution or Use 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ as defined in Executive 

Order 13211, (66 FR 28355, May 22, 

2001) because it is not likely to have a 

significant adverse effect on the supply, 

distribution or use of energy. This 

proposed rule would remove AMP from 

the regulatory definition of VOCs and 

thereby relieve users of the compound 

from requirements to control its 

emissions. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113, section 12(d), (15 U.S.C. 272 

note) directs the EPA to use voluntary 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 59 / Thursday, March 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules 17091 

consensus standards in its regulatory 

activities unless to do so would be 

inconsistent with applicable law or 

otherwise impractical. Voluntary 

consensus standards are technical 

standards (e.g., materials specifications, 

test methods, sampling procedures and 

business practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. The NTTAA directs 

the EPA to provide Congress, through 

OMB, explanations when the agency 

decides not to use available and 

applicable voluntary consensus 

standards. This rulemaking does not 

involve technical standards. Therefore, 

the EPA has not considered the use of 

any voluntary consensus standards. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 

7629, Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

The EPA has determined that this 

proposed rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it would not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 51 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Ozone, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: March 21, 2014. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06789 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0248; FRL–9908–47– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Pennsylvania; Carbon Monoxide 

Second Limited Maintenance Plan for 

the Pittsburgh Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) proposes to approve a 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which 

consists of a second limited 

maintenance plan for the carbon 

monoxide (CO) Pittsburgh Area (‘‘the 

Pittsburgh Area’’ or ‘‘the Area’’) in 

Allegheny County, formerly designated 

as a CO nonattainment area. In the Final 

Rules section of this Federal Register, 

EPA is approving the Commonwealth’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this action, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

DATES: Comments must be received in 

writing by April 28, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2012–0248 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: Fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0248, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Program Planning, 

Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012– 

0248. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental 

Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 

Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market 

Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 

and at the Allegheny County Health 

Department, Bureau of Environmental 

Quality, Division of Air Quality, 301 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES