alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Pennington County Recource Advisory Committee will meet in Rapid City, SD. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations for approval of remaining project proposals.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 13, 2011, at 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Mystic Ranger District Office at 8221 South Highway 16. Written comments should be sent to Robert J. Thompson, 8221 South Highway 16, Rapid City, SD 57702. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to                         *rjthompson@fs.fed.us,*                         or via facsimile to 605-343-7134.                    

All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments received at the Mystic Ranger District office. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead at 605-343-1567 to facilitate entry into the building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert J. Thompson, District Ranger, Mystic Ranger District, 605-343-1567.

Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Meetings are open to the public. The following business will be conducted: review and make recommendations for approval of remaining project proposals.

Dated: August 16, 2011.

Dan S. Dallas,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-21478 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Hillsborough

No. 7332

#### Patricia Bouchard & *a. v.*Mark Klepacki

April 30, 1976

*Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green*and *Lee W. Mercer*by brief for the plaintiff.

Per curiam.

The issue in this paternity action under RSA ch. 168-A (Supp. 1975) is whether the trial court erred when it denied plaintiff’s motion for substituted service by publication under RSA 510:4 II (Supp. 1975), known as the “Long Arm Statute”. No exception was taken, but all questions of law were transferred by *Flynn,*J.

Although no exception was taken to the ruling, it presented a single issue which was plainly raised and which was transferred by *258;he trial court. We therefore consider it. *Kacavisti v. Sprague Electric Co.,*102 N.H. 266, 155 A.2d 185 (1959); *Gosselin v. Lemay,*85 N.H. 13, 18, 153 A. 716, 719 (1931); RSA 491:17.

The allegations of the petition are sufficient to bring the matter within the terms of RSA 510:4 (Supp. 1975) and to satisfy the standards required by *International Shoe Co. v. Washington,*326 U.S. 310 (1945), and *Hanson v. Denckla,*357 U.S. 235 (1958). It is alleged that “On or about April 25, 1974 and on numerous other accasions between September of 1973 and May 16, 1974, Mark M. Klepacki had sexual relations with petitioner....” in Manchester, New Hampshire as a result of which a child was “born on or about January 25, 1975 ....” The petition further alleges that defendant was a resident of New Hampshire during the period between September 1973 and May 16, 1974, and his residence at the time of filing the petition was alleged to be South Hadley, Massachusetts.

The motion for substituted service alleges that the notice sent to the last known address stated in the petition was returned unclaimed and requests substitute notice by publication in a newspaper in general circulation in South Hadley, Massachusetts, in accordance with RSA 510:4 II.

The alleged acts giving rise to an obligation to support occurred in New Hampshire while defendant was present in the State. The cause of action grows out of those acts and the failure of defendant to perform his legal duty of support. This is sufficient to bring the case within the statute and to provide the necessary “minimum contacts” to meet federal due process requirements. *See Nickas v. Nickas,*113 N.H. 261, 306 A.2d 51 (1973); *Gentry v. Davis,*512 S.W.2d 4 (Tenn. 1974). It being alleged that defendant is a nonresident, it is immaterial that he was a resident at the time of the alleged acts. *Kinchla v. Baumner,*114 N.H. 818, 330 A.2d 112 (1974). There are methods available to the plaintiff for enforcement of any orders which may be made, including that provided in the “Uniform Act on Paternity” RSA 168-A:4 (Supp. 1975).

*Remanded.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 659

Designating September 27, 2008, as Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2008

 Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mrs. Clinton) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating September 27, 2008, as Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery 
                                  Day.

Whereas treatment and long-term recovery from substance use disorders can offer 
        a renewed outlook on life for those who are addicted and their family 
        members;
Whereas more than 23,000,000 people in the United States struggle with substance 
        use disorders;
Whereas people who receive treatment for substance use disorders can lead more 
        productive and fulfilling lives, personally and professionally;
Whereas studies have consistently found that treatment is essential for people 
        to be successful in their paths of recovery;
Whereas real stories of long-term recovery can inspire others to ask for help 
        and improve their own lives, the lives of their families, and the entire 
        community;
Whereas it is critical that we educate our community members that substance use 
        disorders are treatable chronic diseases, and that by reaching out to 
        those who suffer from these disorders we can improve the quality of life 
        for the entire community;
Whereas, to help achieve this goal, the Department of Health and Human Services, 
        the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the 
        National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependency, the Partnership for 
        a Drug-Free America, and A&E Television Networks, along with thousands 
        of people from across the country, will hold a Recovery Rally on the 
        Brooklyn Bridge and in City Hall Park in New York City on September 27, 
        2008; and
Whereas the Recovery Rally will be part of National Alcohol and Drug Addiction 
        Recovery Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 27, 2008, as Alcohol and Drug 
        Addiction Recovery Day; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        this day with appropriate programs, activities, and ceremonies.
                                 <all>
```
**GAO-09-113R**                      Published: Nov 19, 2008. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2008.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Section 830 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 directed GAO to compare procedures used for awarding noncompetitive defense contracts for new projects pursuant to (1) congressionally directed spending items or congressional earmarks and (2) the special interests of senior executive branch officials.

## Full Report

Full Report (11 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

National Defense

executive relationsContract termsContractsDefense budgetsDefense operationsDefense procurementDepartment of Defense contractorsInterested partiesSpending legislationEarmarksPolicies and procedures
##### 



(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick

James L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 28, 2006
Adult Protective Services under SSA Title XX Section 2042(b)

FY 2021 Allocation

4/1/2021

State Award Amount

Alabama $1,367,545

Alaska $704,100

Arizona $2,034,877

Arkansas $831,205

California $9,476,701

Colorado $1,390,039

Connecticut $1,022,558

Delaware $704,100

District of Columbia $140,809

Florida $6,896,415

Georgia $2,490,713

Hawaii $704,100

Idaho $704,100

Illinois $3,324,229

Indiana $1,765,688

Iowa $884,872

Kansas $768,741

Kentucky $1,216,527

Louisiana $1,211,268

Maine $704,100

Maryland $1,571,936

Massachusetts $1,893,433

Michigan $2,868,691

Minnesota $1,501,422

Mississippi $788,509

Missouri $1,712,169

Montana $704,100

Nebraska $704,100

Nevada $795,772

New Hampshire $704,100

New Jersey $2,401,390

New Mexico $704,100

New York $5,306,382

North Carolina $2,813,974

North Dakota $704,100

Ohio $3,319,395

Oklahoma $1,022,727

Oregon $1,212,402

Pennsylvania $3,839,908

Rhode Island $704,100

South Carolina $1,490,158

South Dakota $704,100

Tennessee $1,842,330

Texas $6,174,152

Utah $704,100

Vermont $704,100

Virginia $2,205,652

Washington $1,962,724

West Virginia $704,100

Wisconsin $1,655,767

Wyoming $704,100

American Samoa $93,880

Guam $93,880

Northern Mariana Islands $93,880

Puerto Rico $1,037,800

Virgin Islands $93,880

TOTAL $93,880,000
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on (Form S-8 No. 333-38880) pertaining to the 1987 Stock Option Plan, the 1992 Non-employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Non-employee Directors’ StockOption Plan and the Advisory Agreements and on (Form S-3 Nos. 333-125336 and 333-125334) of our reports dated February 24, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Tanox, Inc., Tanox, Inc. management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Tanox, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

Houston, Texas 

February 24, 2006
Exhibit 

32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period endingSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay Isco, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: February 13, 2007 | By:/s/			Jay Isco                                                     |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Jay Isco, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM S. POFF,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 14-35595

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00463-JLR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 22, 2015** 

Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner William S. Poff appeals pro se from the district court’s

order striking his “verified notification to recommence litigation of habeas claims.”

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Poff contends that, because he did not receive notice of the order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court abused its discretion and violated his

due process rights by striking his “notification to recommence” his section 2255

proceedings. He further contends that the lack of notice entitles him to equitable

tolling of the time to file a notice of appeal. 

Construing Poff’s “notification to recommence” as a motion to reopen the

time to file an appeal, see United States v. Withers, 638 F.3d 1055, 1061 (9th Cir.

2011), the district court lacked jurisdiction to reopen because the “notification to

recommence” was filed more than 180 days after the entry of judgment. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This time limit is jurisdictional and, therefore, not subject to

equitable tolling. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Nor does its

application violate Poff’s due process rights. See United States ex rel. Haight v.

Catholic Healthcare West, 602 F.3d 949, 954 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-35595
§ 127.105 Layout and spacing of marine transfer area for LNG. ( a ) LNG impounding spaces must be located so that the heat flux from a fire over the impounding spaces does not cause structural damage to an LNG vessel moored or berthed at the waterfront facility handling LNG.
( b ) Each LNG loading flange must be located at least 300 meters (984.3 feet) from the following which are primarily intended for the use of the general public or railways: ( 1 ) Each bridge crossing a navigable waterway.
( 2 ) Each entrance to any tunnel under a navigable waterway.
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.26-1 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart establish charges which shall be imposed by the Coast Guard when the Coast Guard sells supplies, equipment, apparatus, temporary shelter, and services under certain specified conditions as authorized by law.
( b ) These sales are intended to permit repayment of costs involved in those instances which are ordinarily outside the scope of those distress services with which the Coast Guard is primarily concerned (14 U.S.C. 88), or the equipment and apparatus are not readily procurable in the open market.
#### W. J. Brown v. Frank L. Dunn.

Filed October 17, 1893.

No. 4865.

Review: Briefs: Practice. Where no briefs are filed by either party in a ease brought here on error, this court will examine the pleadings and evidence, and if they support the judgment rendered, it will be affirmed. To obtain a review of specific errors they must be pointed out in the brief of the party complaining. *Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Reams,*37 Neb., 423, followed.

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J.

*Harwood, Ames &*Kelly, for plaintiff in error.

*Adams & Scott, contra.*

Ragan, C.

This is an action of forcible detainer brought by Frank L. Dunn against W. J. Brown. The district court of Lan*53caster county, *after*a trial to a jury and a finding by them that the defendant was guilty, rendered judgment of restitution against Brown and he brings the case here on error.

No briefs have been filed by either party. The judgment of the district court is supported by both the pleadings and the evidence. The case appears to have been brought here simply for delay. We will not examine errors alleged in a petition in error unless such errors are specifically pointed out and relied upon in the briefs filed in the case, under the rules of this court. *(Phœnix Ins. Co. v.*Reams, 37 Neb., 423.) The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

EXHIBIT  32.1:  CERTIFICATION  OF  PRINCIPAL  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER  AND  PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




     In connection with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Nesco
Industries,  Inc.  for the year ended April 30,  2005,  the  undersigned  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

               (1)  such  Annual  Report on Form 10-QSB for the year ended April
                    30, 2005 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)  the  information  contained  in such  Annual  Report on Form
                    10-QSB for the year ended April 30, 2005 fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of operations of Nesco Industries, Inc.




         March 31, 2006                     /s/ Matthew Harriton
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Name: Matthew Harriton
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                            (principal executive officer
                                            and principal financial officer)