alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ToC

A4-AB Board and Care and Similar Facility Complaints with Complaints/Bed by State

BC Complaints Numbers and Percents by Group

BC Complaints Numbers by Group

BC Complaints Percents by Group

A4-CD Board and Care and Similar Facility Complaints by Group and Subgroup by State

BC Residents Rights' Complaint Numbers and Percents by Subgroup

BC Residents Rights' Complaint Numbers by Subgroup

BC Residents Rights' Complaint Percents by Subgroup

BC Resident Care Complaint Numbers and Percents by Subgroup

BC Resident Care Complaint Numbers by Subgroup

BC Resident Care Complaint Percents by Subgroup

BC Quality of Care Complaint Numbers and Percents by Subgroup

BC Quality of Care Complaint Numbers by Subgroup

BC Quality of Care Complaint Percents by Subgroup

BC Administration Complaint Numbers and Percents by Subgroup

BC Administration Complaint Numbers by Subgroup

BC Administration Complaint Percents by Subgroup

BC Not Against Facility Complaint Numbers and Percents by Subgroup

BC Not Against Facility Complaint Numbers by Subgroup

BC Not Against Facility Complaint Percents by Subgroup

A4-AB Board and Care and Similar Facility Complaints with Complaints/Bed by Region

A4-CD Board and Care and Similar Facility Complaints by Group and Subgroup by Region

# A-4A-B BC-Comp beds by State

Table of Contents

# A-4A-B BC-Comp beds by Region

Table of Contents

# BC Complaint Group Numbers+%s

Table of Contents

# BC Complaint Group Numbers

Table of Contents

# BC Complaint Group Percents

Table of Contents

# A-4C-D BC-Comp grp by State

# A-4C-D BC-Comp grp by Region

# BC Residents Rights Numbers +%s

Table of Contents

# BC Residents Rights Numbers

Table of Contents

# BC Residents Rights Percents

Table of Contents

# BC Resident Care Numbers +%s

Table of Contents

# BC Resident Care Numbers

Table of Contents

# BC Resident Care Percents

Table of Contents

# BC Quality of Life Numbers +%s

Table of Contents

# BC Quality of Life Numbers

Table of Contents

# BC Quality of Life Percents

Table of Contents

# BC Administration Numbers +%s

Table of Contents

# BC Administration Numbers

Table of Contents

# BC Administration Percents

Table of Contents

# BC Not Against Facil Numbers+%s

Table of Contents

# BC Not Against Facil Numbers

Table of Contents

# BC Not Against Facil Percents

Table of Contents
EXHIBIT 

31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, George Lefevre, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MotivNation, Inc.(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report;and 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theCompany as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report. 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by the quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions)

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company'sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls overfinancial reporting. 

 

Dated: June 23, 2005                                                                                                                                By:  */s/George Lefevre           *
                                                                                                                                                                          George Lefevre CEO
Exhibit 32(a)

                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The
Southern Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we, the undersigned,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual
knowledge and belief, that:

(1)      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the
         quarter ended March 31, 2005, which this statement accompanies, fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The
         Southern Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of The Southern Company.

                                            /s/David M. Ratcliffe
                                              David M. Ratcliffe
                                            Chairman, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                             /s/Thomas A. Fanning
                                               Thomas A. Fanning
                                           Executive Vice President,
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  May 4, 2005
#### § 174.125 Coast Guard address.

The report required by § 174.123 of this subpart must be sent to the Commandant (CG-BSX-2), Attn: Boating Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501.

[USCG-2003-14963, 77 FR 18703, Mar. 28, 2012, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38448, July 7, 2014]
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 11:06 AM

To: 'clint@dfwflyby.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: CE Harris Family, LLC (FAA-2015-0803)

May 21, 2015 

Dear Mr. Harris: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0803). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 4, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
2
Original

No. 7358

#### State of New Hampshire v. James J. Seeley

January 31, 1976

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *Peter W. Bleed,*attorney *(Mr. Heed*orally), for the State.

*Leppo & Paris*of Massachusetts and *Barrett & McNeill (Mr. Michael A. Paris*orally) for the defendant.

Per curiam.

This is an original petition asking us to set bail for the defendant pending an appeal of his conviction and sentence for burglary. RSA 597:l-a (Supp. 1975) provides that bail pending appeal shall be set by the trial court except in certain cases including a “substantial risk” that the defendant will “otherwise interfere with the administration of justice.” It is further provided in RSA 597:1-a (Supp. 1975) that “[i]n any case where release is denied pending appeal, the presiding justice shall provide for the record the reasons for such denial.”

The Trial Court *(Perkins,*J.) denied the defendant release on bail and found “there is a substantial risk that the defendant if released on bail will interfere once again with the administration of justice, as was attempted in the instant case, namely, to again break and enter and carry away evidence held at the Rockingham Justice Administration Building

We have nothing before us in this case except the defendant’s petition and the answer of the State. While it is well established that *58the question of bail is a discretionary matter *(State v. Booton,*114 N.H. 152, 317 A.2d 18 (1974); *Moses v. Helgemoe,*115 N.H. 672, 348 A.2d 354 (1975)), it is evident that the purpose of RSA 597:1-a (Supp. 1975) is to encourage the release on bail of defendants pending appeal. The trial court in denying bail in this case was cognizant of RSA 597:l-a (Supp. 1975) and made the specific finding required by the statute. In the absence of any transcript of the trial, probation department report or transcript of the sentence hearing, it must be presumed his findings were supported by evidence and not an abuse of discretion. *Howard Laces, Inc. v. Colby Footwear, Inc.,*112 N.H. 380, 296 A.2d 909 (1972); *Bergeron v. Hunt,*110 N.H. 278, 266 A.2d 121 (1970); *cf. State v. Slade,*115 N.H. 224, 337 A.2d 536 (1975).

*Petition dismissed.*
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex
Incorporated for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex
Incorporated.





/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.Name:  John
      Adamovich, Jr.Date:  November
      5, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through PersonCentered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Aging 

Name of ADRC and Healthcare Partners: 

Delaware County ADRC, Crozer Keystone Health System’s Taylor and Springfield hospitals. 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Jack Vogelsong 

 717-772-0371 

 jvogelsong@state.pa.us

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Transitional Care Model 

Project Summary: 

The Pennsylvania Department of Aging/Office of Long Term Living proposes to work with the 

Delaware County Office of Services for the Aging (COSA), to replicate the Transitional Care Model 

(TCM) providing comprehensive discharge planning and assessment along with intensive in-home 

follow-up by advanced practice nurses (APNs) with the Crozer Keystone Health System (CKHS). 

CKHS comprises five hospitals, a comprehensive physician network of primary-care and specialty 

practices. Building upon the current transitional care program with CKHS’ Taylor Hospital, COSA 

assessors will be housed at the hospital to identify and engage older adults most at risk for rehospitalizations. The program will expand to CKHS’ Springfield hospital in its second year.

Goal/Objectives: 

The overriding goal for the project will be to prevent re-hospitalizations for a minimum of 235 seniors

that are identified as high risk. An APN will monitor patients upon discharge ensuring their needs are 

met in the transition from acute care to community based settings. Specific objectives are to: Provide 

early identification and assessment of patients at risk of readmission to the hospital and to avoid long 

term nursing home placement for at-risk seniors; Provide home visits and daily telephone support by 

an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) for a minimum of two months post-hospitalization; Engage in a 

multidisciplinary approach that ensures continuity of care working with patients, caregivers, families, 

physicians, in close collaboration with COSA, to ensure that all available supportive services are 

utilized. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

The expected outcomes of the project are: To improve care-coordination; Decrease in rehospitalizations of at-risk patients 65. Significant savings to Medicare and insurers due to decreased 

hospitalizations; significant long-term savings to Medicaid as a result of nursing home diversions; A 

more timely on-site hospital assessment and development of a transition care plan; In-home visit by an 

advanced practice nurse within 24-48 hours of hospital discharge. Continued follow-up and service 

coordination by AAA Care Manager in AAA long term care system. A final report and evaluation will 

be provided by the Public Health Management Corporation (PHMC) along with results of consumer
satisfaction surveys. The end result will be a comprehensive TCM program ready for replication across the 

state.
Motion Granted and Order filed September 9, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00699-CV

____________

IN RE MARK ATHANS, OMAR MARTINEZ AND PRESTIGE SURGICAL 

ASSISTANTS, LLC, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-05129

ORDER

On August 27, 2014, relators Mark Athans, Omar Martinez, and Prestige 

Surgical Assistants, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. 

Relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Larry Weiman, presiding judge of 

the 80th District Court of Harris County, to vacate an order dated May 29, 2014 
2

granting a motion for new trial filed by real party in interest American Surgical 

Assistants, Inc.

Relators also filed a motion for a temporary stay of the underlying 

proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On August 28, 2014, relators 

asked this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the 

petition for writ of mandamus. The same day, the real party in interest filed a 

response to relators’ motion to stay in which it states that it does not oppose 

relators’ motion and agrees the trial court proceedings should be stayed. 

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’

request for mandamus relief requires further consideration, and that judicial 

economy will best be served by a grant of temporary relief. We therefore GRANT 

relators’ motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 2013-05129, styled 

American Surgical Assistants, Inc. d/b/a American Surgical Professionals v. Mark 

Athans, et al., STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators’ petition for 

writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.
§ 151.07 Delegations. Each Coast Guard official designated as a Captain of the Port (COTP) or Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) or Commanding Officer, Sector Office, is delegated the authority to— ( a ) Issue International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificates;
( b ) Detain or deny entry to ships not in substantial compliance with MARPOL 73/78 or not having an IOPP Certificate or evidence of compliance with MARPOL 73/78 on board;
( c ) Receive and investigate reports under § 151.15; and
( d ) Issue subpoenas to require the attendance of any witness and the production of documents and other evidence, in the course of investigations of potential violations of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1901-1911), this subpart, or MARPOL 73/78.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18404, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by CGD 88-002A, 55 FR 18582, May 2, 1990; USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, July 2, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAMPART
CAPITAL  CORPORATION
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     328,443
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            3,798,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                              4,270,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                   8,170,758
<DEPRECIATION>                            (203,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          16,516,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                  6,008,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    30,500
<OTHER-SE>                               9,772,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            16,516,601
<SALES>                                  1,529,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,529,282
<CGS>                                      710,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              710,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,422,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          78,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (682,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                23,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (659,664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.22)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification by Nick Heyes pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

          Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. [section] 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Inforte Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                     | INFORTE CORP. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
|                                                                                                                                     |          |   |
|                                                                                                                                     | By:           | */s/ NICK HEYES* |
|                                                                                                                                     |          |  |
|                     March   20, 2005 |          | Nick   Heyes, |
|                                                                                                                                     |          | Chief   Financial Officer |

**END OF FILING**
# A-3C-D NF-Comp grp
Generated: Aug 19, 2022 3:40PM Page 1/1

U.S. District Court

Florida Southern - West Palm Beach

Receipt Date: Aug 19, 2022 3:40PM

Richard Strother

Rcpt. No: 7994 Trans. Date: Aug 19, 2022 3:40PM Cashier ID: #PC

CD Purpose Case/Party/Defendant Qty Price Amt

200 Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner 1 402.00 402.00

CD Tender Amt

CC Credit Card $402.00

Total Due: $402.00

Total Tendered: $402.00

Total Cash Received: $0.00

Cash Change Amount: $0.00

Comments: 22cv81292

Checks and drafts are accepted subject to collection and full credit will only be given when the check or draft has been accepted by the

financial institution on which it was drawn.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.81 Baffles.

Baffles in sewage retention tanks, if any, must have openings to allow liquid and vapor to flow freely across the top and bottom of the tank.
###### Editorial Note on Part 165

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

#### § 165.10 Regulated navigation areas.

A regulated navigation area is a water area within a defined boundary for which regulations for vessels navigating within the area have been established under this part.