alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1106 San Diego Bay, California—safety zone. ( a ) The waters of San Diego Bay enclosed by the following boundaries are a safety zone: From a point located on the boundary of Coast Guard Air Station San Diego, California at latitude 32°43′37.2′′ N, longitude 117°10′45.0′′ W (point A), for a point of beginning; thence southeasterly to latitude 32°43′36.2′′ N, longitude 117°10′41.5′′ W (point B); thence southwesterly to latitude 32°43′20.2′′ N, longitude 117°10′49.5′′ W (point C); thence northwesterly to latitude 32°43′25.7′′ N, longitude 117°11′04.6′′ W (point D); thence northeasterly to latitude 32°43′35.7′′ N, longitude 117°10′59.5′′ W (point E); thence generally easterly along the air station boundary to the point of beginning (point A).
( b ) ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry into the area of this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, except as provided for below.
( 2 ) Vessels may transit the area of this safety zone without permission, but may not anchor, stop, remain within the zone, or approach within 100 yards (92 meters) of the land area of Coast Guard Air Station San Diego or structures attached thereto.
[CGD 85-034, 50 FR 14703, Apr. 15, 1985 and COTP San Diego Reg. 85-06, 50 FR 38003, Sept. 19, 1985. Redesignated by USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33642, June 25, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 641 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 641

Congratulating the Focus on the Family radio program for its induction 
                 into the National Radio Hall of Fame.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2008

  Mr. Brownback (for himself, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. 
   Martinez, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
                           and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the Focus on the Family radio program for its induction 
                 into the National Radio Hall of Fame.

Whereas the National Radio Hall of Fame & Museum was created to commemorate 
        significant figures in the world of radio, a medium that has been 
        integral to American society since the early 20th century;
Whereas a key element of the mission of the National Radio Hall of Fame & Museum 
        is to recognize and showcase contemporary talent from diverse radio 
        programming formats;
Whereas, each November since 1992, significant radio figures have been honored 
        for their excellence in the field of radio by being inducted into the 
        National Radio Hall of Fame;
Whereas James C. Dobson, Ph.D., is founder and chairman of Focus on the Family;
Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program first aired in 1977 and now is 
        heard through more than 3,000 radio outlets in North America and in 27 
        languages in over 160 other countries;
Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program has benefitted the lives of 
        families and individuals across the United States and around the world;
Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program has been named as a 2008 inductee 
        to the National Radio Hall of Fame; and
Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program is the first faith-based radio 
        program to receive this honor: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Focus on the Family 
radio program, its staff, and its founder and chairman, James Dobson, 
for their excellence in radio programming and the program's worthy 
induction into the National Radio Hall of Fame.
                                 <all>
```
§ 154.1028 Methods of ensuring the availability of response resources by contract or other approved means. ( a ) When required in this subpart, the availability of response resources must be ensured by the following methods: ( 1 ) A written contractual agreement with an oil spill removal organization. The agreement must identify and ensure the availability of specified personnel and equipment required under this subpart within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas;
( 2 ) Certification by the facility owner or operator that specified personnel and equipment required under this subpart are owned, operated, or under the direct control of the facility owner or operator, and are available within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas;
( 3 ) Active membership in a local or regional oil spill removal organization that has identified specified personnel and equipment required under this subpart that are available to respond to a discharge within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas;
( 4 ) A document which— ( i ) Identifies the personnel, equipment, and services capable of being provided by the oil spill removal organization within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas;
( ii ) Sets out the parties' acknowledgment that the oil spill removal organization intends to commit the resources in the event of a response;
( iii ) Permits the Coast Guard to verify the availability of the identified response resources through tests, inspections, and drills; and
( iv ) Is referenced in the response plan; or
( 5 ) The identification of an oil spill removal organization with specified equipment and personnel available within stipulated response times in specified geographic areas. The organization must provide written consent to being identified in the plan.
( b ) The contracts and documents required in paragraph (a) of this section must be retained at the facility and must be produced for review upon request by the COTP.
§ 156.215 Pre-arrival notices. ( a ) The master, owner or agent of each vessel to be lightered must give at least 24 hours advance notice to the Captain of the Port nearest the lightering location or zone, prior to arrival in the lightering location or zone. This advance notice must include: ( 1 ) The vessel's name, call sign or official number, and registry:
( 2 ) The cargo type (if oil) or shipping name (if hazardous material) and approximate amount on board;
( 3 ) The number of transfers expected and the amount of cargo expected to be transferred during each transfer;
( 4 ) The lightering location or zone to be used;
( 5 ) The estimated time of arrival in the lightering location or zone;
( 6 ) The estimated duration of transfer operations; and
( 7 ) The name and destination of service vessel(s).
( b ) In the event the estimated time of arrival in the lightering location or zone changes by more than six hours, the Master, owner or agent of each vessel to be lightered must advise the Captain of the Port of this change as soon as possible.
( c ) Where lightering is conducted as a result of collision, grounding, tank rupture or any similar emergency, immediate notice must be given to the Captain of the Port.
( d ) In addition to the other requirements in this section, the master, owner, or agent of a vessel that requires a Tank Vessel Examination (TVE) or other special Coast Guard inspection in order to lighter in a designated lightering zone must request the TVE or other inspection from the cognizant Captain of the Port at least 72 hours prior to commencement of lightering operations.
[CGD 78-180, 49 FR 11172, Mar. 26, 1984, as amended by CGD 90-052, 58 FR 48437, Sept. 15, 1993; CGD 93-081, 60 FR 45017, Aug. 29, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.823 Allegheny River, Monongahela River, and Ohio River, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Regulated Navigation Area. ( a ) *Location.* The following is a regulated navigation area (RNA): The waters of the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers between the Ninth Street Highway Bridge at mile marker (MM) 0.8 on the Allegheny River, Fort Pitt Highway Bridge at MM 0.22 on the Monongahela River, and West End-North Side Highway Bridge at MM 0.8 on the Ohio River.
( b ) *Applicability.* This section applies to any vessel operating within the RNA, including a naval or public vessel, except a vessel engaged in: ( 1 ) Law enforcement;
( 2 ) Servicing aids to navigation; or
( 3 ) Surveying, maintaining, or improving waters within the RNA.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) No vessel shall loiter, anchor, stop, moor, remain or drift at any time more than 100 feet from any river bank within the RNA without permission of the Captain of the Port (COTP), or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the COTP to act on his or her behalf.
( 2 ) No vessel shall loiter, anchor, stop, moor, remain or drift in any manner as to impede safe passage of another vessel to any launching ramp, marina, or fleeting area.
[USCG-2019-0118, 85 FR 2307, Jan. 15, 2020]
EXHIBIT 10(vi)

DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



Agreement made on December 19, 2002 between Shafiq Nazerali with offices located at General Guisan - Quai 36, CH-8002 Zurich, Switzerland, referred to as Creditor and Sona Development Corp. with offices located at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.



SECTION ONE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATION



The parties acknowledge that Debtor is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $85,000 for consulting services rendered in 2001 and 2002.



SECTION TWO
AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT METHOD OF PAYMENT



Debtor and Creditor desire and agree, to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms an provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment for same contained in the original loan obligation as described in Section One above.



SECTION THREE
CONSIDERATION



In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:



|a. | Method of Payment:Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in Section One, above, 566,667 shares of Debtor's common stock, valued at $0.15 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of services provided by Creditor to Debtor.   
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Creditor's board of directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 566,667 shares of Debtor's common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.



In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.



Sona Development Corp.





/s/ Nora CoccaroBy: Nora Coccaro, President

Shafiq Nazerali

/s/ Shafiq Nazerali

- 25 -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
   1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Santander BanCorp.
 Date: March 28, 2007
    By:
    /s/ José Ramón GonzálezPresident and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 28, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Carlos M. GarcíaSenior Executive Vice President andChief Operating Officer Date: March 28, 2007
    By:
    /s/ María CaleroExecutive Vice President andChief Accounting Officer
“Churches across the nation

are singing the praises 

of Body & Soul.”

“Body & Soul is a program designed 

for African American churches to

embrace and celebrate good health

through healthy eating. 

As stewards, we have a duty to

encourage the people we love to 

eat a healthy diet that can help

reduce the risk of high blood 

pressure, diabetes, heart disease,

stroke and many types of cancer. 

Many churches have successfully 

used Body & Soul to inspire members

to nourish their bodies as well as

their souls. And what better place 

to start than in the church, where 

so many changes begin.”

Vickie Winans, gospel artist and

national Body & Soul spokesperson

To request a copy of the Body & Soul program guide for your 

church, call 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237), TTY: 1-800-332-8615. 

Online orders may be placed at http://www.cancer.gov/publications.

To learn more about Body & Soul, visit

www.bodyandsoul.nih.gov
What is Body & Soul?

Body & Soul: A Celebration of Healthy Eating and Living

is a health program developed for African American 

churches. The program empowers church members to 

eat a healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables every day 

for better health. Churches that embrace Body & Soul 

help their members take care of their bodies as well 

as their spirits.

Why Body & Soul? 

African Americans are at high risk for many serious and 

often fatal diseases. These include high blood pressure, diabetes, heart 

disease and many types of cancer. A healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables 

promotes good health and can help lower the risk for these illnesses. Eating plenty 

of fruits and vegetables is a smart thing you can do to improve your health. 

How Does Body & Soul Work?

Church members customize and run Body & Soul to fit the needs of their church. All of the information

needed to create the program is provided in the program guide. You can draw upon the many talents

of your church members to nourish and sustain your congregation as they move toward a healthier

“body and soul.” 

What Are the Benefits of Body & Soul?

Body & Soul congregations embrace and celebrate good health through healthy eating. 

Your congregation will:

• Learn how health and spirituality are connected

• Feel empowered to take charge of their health

• Eat more fruits and vegetables every day

• Live healthier in other ways, such as eating less fat and getting more physical activity

• Gain access to vital health information at the church

To request a copy of the Body & Soul program guide for your church, call 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237),

TTY: 1-800-332-8615. Online orders may be placed at http://www.cancer.gov/publications.

A Celebration of Healthy Eating & Living

Body&Soul

To learn more about Body & Soul, visit www.bodyandsoul.nih.gov
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Todd David Rogers v. Gina Marie Rogers

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00224

- CV

Trial court case number: 12

- DCV

- 199022

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

On January 26 , 201 5 , appellant, Todd David Rogers, filed a premature notice of appeal in the trial court , deemed filed after t he final decree of divorc e was signed by the

trial court on September 14 , 2015

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 7 .1 (a)

. On December 15 , 2015, appellant filed hi s appellate brief, setting appellee’ s brief to be due within 30 days. See

id. 38.6(b). Because appellee failed to timely file her brief, the Clerk of this Court sent a

notice on January 29 , 2016 , informing appellee that the time for filing appellee’ s brief had expired and , unless appellee’ s brief or an extension was filed within 10 days of that notice, that this Court may set this a ppeal for submission without an appellee’ s brief. See

id. 10.5(b), 38.6(d). However, appellee failed to file a timely appellate brief or extension

. Accordingly, this Court requests that an appellee’ s brief be filed with an extension request, or a notice that no brief will be filed, from appellee’ s counsel, Marlene A.

Zinsmeister

, within 10 days of the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 10.5(b),

38.6 (b), (d). The Court notifies appellee that, if no appellee’ s brief or extension is timely filed within 10 days of the date of this order, this Court will set this appeal for submission on the appellant’ s brief only. See id. 38.9(a). Appellant’ s reply brief, if any, must be filed within 20 days after the appellee’ s brief is filed , if any

. See id. 38.6(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually

Date: March 10, 2016
awcex106.htm





Exhibit 10.6(a)(ii)










FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AND AGREEMENT










 


Reference the original Lease and Agreement between Amwood Associates (Lessor) and American Woodmark Corporation (Lessee) dated November 1, 1984 as amended January 1, 1985, March 30, 2001 and July 20, 2006.










 


It is the intent of both the Lessor and the Lessee to execute a fourth amendment to the original lease granting the Lessee an additional five year option for the period beginning April 1, 2011 and ending March 31, 2016 with the following terms and conditions.










 


RENT SCHEDULE










 


Per our discussion, we are in agreement to waive the appraisal required by the lease to determine the fair market lease value and agree to the rent scheduled as outlined below.









 



	

Period



	 	

Adjustment



	 	 	

S/Month



	 	 	

$/Year



	 
	

4/1/11 to 3/31/12



	 	N/C	 	 	$	38,328.76	 	 	$	459,945.12	 
	

4/1/12 to 3/31/13



	 	N/C	 	 	$	38,328.76	 	 	$	459,945.12	 
	

4/1/13 to 3/31/14



	 	

plus 2%



	 	 	$	39,095.34	 	 	$	469,144.08	 
	

4/1/14 to 3/31/15



	 	

plus 2%



	 	 	$	39,877.25	 	 	$	478,527.00	 
	

4/1/15 to 3/31/16



	 	

plus 2%



	 	 	$	40,674.80	 	 	$	488,097.60	 














The annual rent payable is due in equal monthly installments on the first day of each month during the lease year.










 


EARLY TERMINATION










 


It is further agreed that both the Lessor and the Lessee shall have the right to terminate this lease during the option period (4/1/11 to 3/31/16) by giving notice in writing to the other party 12 months prior to the effective date of termination with no specified reason or cause.










 


Except as set forth in this Amendment, all of the other terms and conditions of the original lease as executed on November 1, 1984 and amended January 1, 1985, March 30, 2001 and July 20, 2006 shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. Henceforth, all references to the lease shall be deemed to refer to the lease as amended by the first, second, third and fourth Amendments.










 


WITNESS the following signatures:


 





AMWOOD ASSOCIATES, a Virginia Partnership










	
AMWOOD ASSOCIATES, a


	

Virginia Partnership




	
By:

	
/s/ Richard A. Graber


	  	
General Partner


	
AMERICAN WOODMARK


	
CORPORATION, a Virginia Corporation


	
By:

	
/s/ Glenn Eanes


	
Title:

	
Vice President & Treasurer
### EAARL topography - Vicksburg National Military Park 2008: Bare earth

By: Amar NayegandhiJohn Brock**C. Wayne WrightMartha SeguraXan Yates

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds390

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
#### § 161.30 Vessel Traffic Service Louisville.

The VTS area consists of the navigable waters of the Ohio River between McAlpine Locks (Mile 606.8) and Twelve Mile Island (Mile 593), only when the McAlpine upper pool gauge is at 13.0 feet or above.

[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36324, July 15, 1994, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35531, June 30, 1998]
#### Edward A. Oliver, Administrator, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company.

Filed June 5, 1894.

No. 4011.

IReview: Assignments oe Ebeob. Inadequacy of the damages found by the jury cannot be considered in this court when not assigned as error in the petition in error upon which a review is sought.

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

*A.*Y. *Sullivan,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. M. Marquett, J. W. Deioeese,*and *Byron Clarh, oonlra.*

Ryan, C.

The nature of this action and the sole questions involved are in the brief of plaintiff in error stated as follows:

*846“This action was brought in the district court of Cass county, Nebraska, by plaintiff in error against defendant in error, to recover for damages for wrongfully and negligently causing the death of Richard K. Letford. A trial in the district court resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $300. Plaintiff, filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and a judgment entered on the verdict, to reverse which, the case is brought to this court.

“ But two questions will be presented for consideration, viz., the inadequacy of the damages recovered, and error of striking from the files certain affidavits made by members of the jury as to the cause that produced this very small verdict.”

The affidavits were properly stricken from the records, for they tended only to show that the verdict was agreed upon to avoid further detention in the jury room. If this manner of impeaching verdicts was permitted there could scarcely be conclusively tried to a jury a single case closely contested, supplemenled by industrious affidavit-seeking. We cannot, upon affidavits or any other form of evidence, consider whether or not the verdict was for too small an amount, because in the petition in error such an assignment does not appear. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.