alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99(f)

                 Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC
                         Series 2003-1 Transition Bonds
                           Outstanding Bond Balances
                     As of February 16, 2004 Payment Date
                                   (in $'s)


                                                             Principal
                                                              Balance
                                Scheduled                     After
         Payment                 Principal                    Actual
          Dates                   Balance                    Payments
          -----                   -------                    --------

         08/21/03              500,000,000                  500,000,000
         02/16/04              492,306,305                  492,306,305
         08/16/04              477,456,761
         02/15/05              456,942,229
         08/15/05              441,696,293
         02/15/06              420,759,491
         08/15/06              405,119,707
         02/15/07              383,786,579
         08/15/07              367,605,693
         02/15/08              345,452,767
         08/15/08              328,581,952
         02/15/09              305,694,545
         08/15/09              288,018,970
         02/15/10              264,321,740
         08/15/10              245,757,142
         02/15/11              221,067,258
         08/15/11              201,434,510
         02/15/12              175,654,700
         08/15/12              154,894,114
         02/15/13              127,974,759
         08/15/13              105,984,296
         02/15/14               77,762,165
         08/15/14               54,407,684
         02/15/15               24,794,740
         08/15/15                        0
HENRY BROS. ELECTRONICS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the following documents of our report dated
October 17, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Henry
Bros. Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of SAB
No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements), incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Registration Statement No.
333-131671 on Form S-3/A dated March 23, 2006 
Registration Statement No. 333-121056 on Form S-8 dated December 7, 2004 
Registration Statement No. 333-118438 on Form S-3 dated August 20, 2004 
Registration Statement No. 333-114664 on Form S-8 dated April 21, 2004 
Registration Statement No. 333-76802 on Form S-8 dated January 16, 2002

/S/ DEMETRIUS & COMPANY,
L.L.C.

Wayne, New Jersey 
March 29, 2008

50

---
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1189 Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: all navigable waters of the San Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba Buena Island from a point along the southeastern shore of Yerba Buena Island at 37°48′27′′ N, 122°21′44′′ W; east to 37°48′27′′ N, 122°21′35′′ W; north to 37°48′49′′ N, 122°21′35′′ W, a point on the northeastern side of Yerba Buena Island. These coordinates are based on North American Datum (NAD) 83.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general security zone regulations in subpart D of this part, entry into the area of the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco.
( 2 ) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may be permitted by the COTP.
( 3 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP by VHF Marine Radio channel 16 or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The Captain of the Port will enforce the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section and may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of this security zone by any Federal, State, county, municipal, or private agency.
[USCG-2022-0483, 87 FR 58998, Sept. 29, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Relco Locomotives, Inc.; (Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2000-
7256)

    Relco Locomotives, Inc., submitted a request on behalf of Aimcor, 
Inc., seeking a permanent waiver of compliance from certain provisions 
of the Safety Glazing Standards, 49 CFR 223.9, which requires certified 
glazing, for two locomotives utilized in switching service in Port 
Arthur, Texas. The locomotives are identified as RE 1267 and RE 1270. 
Relco indicates that both locomotives are used for switching within 
Aimcor's facility located at the north end of Houston Avenue in Port 
Arthur. The locomotives also operate over a Union Pacific Railroad (UP) 
industrial track within the port facility. The industrial track is used 
by Aimcor, Rail Serve, and UP for movements between different areas of 
the port.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number 2000-
7256) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management 
Facility, Room PL-401 (Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20590. Communications received within 30 days of the date of this 
notice will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above 
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for 
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's web 
site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 25, 2000.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 00-14063 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Over130 

MILLION 

RIDES

to doctors’ offices, 

grocery stores, and 

other essential places

More than 1.5 

MILLION

individual consultations 

to LTC residents and 

their families

Nearly 90% of riders 

say the service helps them 

to continue to live in 

their own homes

98% of riders would 

recommend the 

service to a friend

Over 95% of older adults 

say they would 

recommend the nutrition 

program to friend

More than three-quarters 

report the program 

improves their health

Nearly 100% of older 

adults say the services 

help them to continue to 

live in their own homes

97% of those receiving 

homemaker services 

report needing help with 

heavy housework

96% of older adults say 

case management has 

helped them continue to 

live in their own homes

95% rate the services as 

good to excellent

Almost three-quarters 

of caregivers report 

feeling less stressed due 

to the service

Over 80% report that the 

services made it easier to 

care for their loved one

More than 213,000 

participants in the Senior 

Community Service 

Employment Program

Over 80% of workers 

report that they are 

satisfied with the program

Long-Term Care 

Ombudsmen addressed 

more than 1.1 million 

complaints made by or for 

residents of LTC facilities

75% of complaints 

were resolved or 

partially resolved to the 

satisfaction of the resident

Data presented represent accomplishments between 2008 and 2012.

For more information about OAA programs, please visit http://acl.gov/.

Over 60 

MILLION 

HOURS 

of homemaker 

services

Nearly 20 

MILLION 

HOURS 

of case 

management

More than 

1 BILLION 

MEALS 

served

THE AGING NETWORK SERVES AN AVERAGE 

OF 11 MILLION PEOPLE PER YEAR

IMPACT

OLDER AMERICANS ACT

Over a 5-year period it provided:

Almost 248 

MILLION 

HOURS 

of community service 

Over 

30 

MILLION 

HOURS 

of respite care
IntroductionSuccess StoriesHistory

IntroductionPillar OnePillar TwoPillar ThreePillar Four

IntroductionMaterialsImage LibraryDirectory

| IMAGE LIBRARY						View an image library of professional-quality Body & Soul images to be used to promote Body & Soul events at your church on flyers, bulletin boards, church bulletins, or on your church’s web site. |  |  |  |  |  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |
| Use these photos for all of your communicaiton needs, free of charge. A large collection of people and food photography are available. All images are 300dpi JPEG files saved in RGB color format.                                    |
Attachment 4 ‐ STP manufacturing and processing under submitter's control
### Hydrographs Showing Ground-Water Level Changes for Selected Wells in the Lower Skagit River Basin, Washington

By: E.T. FasserR. J. Julich

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds441

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.101 Kittery, Maine—regulated navigation area. ( a ) The following is a regulated navigation area—Waters within the boundaries of a line beginning at 43°04′50′′ N, 70°44′52′′ W; then to 43°04′52′′ N, 70°44′53′′ W; then to 43°04′59′′ N, 70°44′46′′ W; then to 43°05′05′′ N, 70°44′32′′ W; then to 43°05′03′′ N, 70°44′30′′ W; then to the beginning point.
( b ) *Regulations.* No vessel may operate in this area at a speed in excess of five miles per hour.
#### Scott *v.*Brown.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Complaint. Before Judge Gober. Cherokee superior court. December 21, 1905.

*J. P.*Brooke, for plaintiff in error.

6r. *I. Teasley*and *P. P.*DuPre, contra.

Evans, J.

1. In a suit upon a promissory note, alleged to be due and unpaid, where the defendant admitted its execution and that the plaintiff was the holder thereof, it is not cause for a new trial that the court charged the jury that “if he does not overcome the allegations in the petition, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover the face of the note,” together with interest and attorney’s fees, instead of instructing the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover unless the defendant proved his plea of payment.

2. A charge that “By preponderance of evidence is meant that superior weight of evidence upon the issues involved, which, while it may not be sufficient to convince the mind beyond a reasonable doubt, is yet sufficient to incline a fair and impartial mind to one side of the issue rather than to the other,” is a substantial definition of the term “preponderance of evidence,” as defined in the Civil Code, §5145.

3. The charge of the court on the subject of the application of payments made by the defendant was not open to the criticism that it was indefinite and uncertain and not authorized by the evidence; and the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was warranted.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1470

___________________________

Emanuel L. Swinton

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Hansens Truck Salvage Inc.; U-Pick-It

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: October 20, 2016

Filed: November 7, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Emanuel Swinton appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary 1

judgment in his pro se Title VII employment-discrimination action against his former

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States DistrictJudge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.
employer. We review de novo, see Spears v. Missouri Dep’t of Corr. & Human Res.,

210 F.3d 850, 853 (8th Cir. 2000), and we agree with the district court that Swinton’s

claims ofrace-based discriminatory discharge and retaliation are time-barred because

he filed his lawsuit over seven months late. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1); Baldwin

Cty. Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 (1984) (per curiam) (Title VII

plaintiff must file suit within 90 days of receiving right-to-sue letter from the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission). Contrary to Swinton’s assertion, the 90-day

filing window applies equally to claims of race-based retaliation.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.33 Water ballast in fuel oil tanks.

A new vessel may not carry ballast water in a fuel oil tank.

[CGD 74-32, 40 FR 48283, Oct. 14, 1975, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
WILLIAM QUINONES and LONDON HEIGHTS BRITISH PUB, LLC n/k/a HEIGHTS SPORTS BAR & BISTRO, LLC,

Appellants,
v. MICHAEL A. BOZEL; LYSA M. BOZEL; OLD SEMINOLE HEIGHTS PROPERTIES, LLC; and NIGHTINGALE's INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Appellees.
No. 2D22-2158
April 5, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Caroline Tesche Arkin, Judge. Janelle A. Weber of Manta Law, Tampa; and Michael D. LaBarbera of LaBarbera and Campbell, Tampa, for Appellants. Kevin F. Sanderson of Kevin F. Sanderson, Chartered, Sarasota, for Appellees. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
#### Graves *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,-

Decided December 11, 1906.

Indictment for unlawful sale of liquor. Before Judge Little-john. Crisp superior court. September 26, 1906.

*J. T. Hill,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. A. Hooper, solicitor-general,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

1. On the trial of one charged with taking orders for the sale of intoxicating liquors in a prohibition county, the evidence for the State was to the effect that, within the statute of limitation, many persons frequently went to the accused, at his place of business in such county, and paid him the price of the quantity and variety of intoxicating liquor they desired; whereupon he ordered such liquor over a long-distance telephone from his place of business of divers liquor dealers in other counties, and subsequently delivered the liquor to the purchasers, at his place of business, upon the payment by them of the express charges on the same, the purchasers not knowing from whom the liquor was ordered, nor paying anything for the telephone message. *Held,*that the evidence authorized a verdict of guilty of the offense charged. See *Walker*v. *Slate,*122 *Ga.*747, 124 *Ga.*97; *Smith*v. *State,*ante, 44.

2. Points in the record, made by plaintiff in error, but not referred to in the brief of his counsel, will be considered as having been abandoned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.35 Ballast added to cargo tanks. The master of a tank vessel with segregated ballast tanks or dedicated clean ballast tanks under § 157.09, § 157.10, § 157.10a(a)(1), § 157.10a(b), § 157.10a(c), § 157.10b(a), § 157.10c(b)(1), or § 157.10c(c) shall ensure that ballast water is carried in a cargo tank only if— ( a ) The vessel encounters abnormally severe weather conditions;
( b ) More ballast water than can be carried in segregated ballast tanks or dedicated clean ballast tanks is necessary for the safety of the vessel;
( c ) The ballast water is processed and discharged in compliance with § 157.37; and
( d ) On a new vessel under § 157.10 that carries crude oil, the ballast water is only carried in a cargo tank that is crude oil washed in accordance with Subpart D of this part during or after the most recent discharge of crude oil from that tank.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43708, June 30, 1980, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11626, Mar. 22, 1985]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING OF REDACTED AFFIDAVIT

As described in the government’s Motion to Seal, DE 115, attached hereto is a 

redacted version of the United States’ Affidavit Regarding Detailed Inventory, which is filed 

pursuant to Special Master’s Case Management Plan (DE 112). 

Dated: September 26, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Julie A. Edelstein

Julie A. Edelstein

Deputy Chief

Counterintelligence and Export Control Section

National Security Division

United States Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20530

Special Bar # A5502949

Tel.: 202-233-0986

Email: julie.a.edelstein@usdoj.gov

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 26, 2022, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the 

foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of 

Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.

/s/ Julie A. Edelstein

Julie A. Edelstein

Deputy Chief

Counterintelligence and Export Control Section

National Security Division

United States Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20530

Special Bar # A5502949

Tel.: 202-233-0986

Email: julie.a.edelstein@usdoj.gov

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2022 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.653 St. Mary's Falls Canal.

The draw of the International Railway bridge, mile 1.0 at Sault Ste. Marie, shall be maintained in the fully open position during the navigation season, except for the crossings of trains or for maintenance. Bridge operators shall not give precedence to railway traffic and shall not close the bridge against an upbound vessel after lock gates are open and the vessel is proceeding toward the bridge, nor against a downbound vessel, 1,200 feet or less west of the bridge, unless the vessel is moored at either canal pier awaiting its turn to take position at lock approaches.
§ 154.2180 Alternative testing program—Generally. ( a ) As an alternative to complying with the vapor control system (VCS) analyzer and pressure sensor safety testing requirements provided by 33 CFR 154.2150(c) and 33 CFR 154.2250(c), the facility person in charge may administer a reliability assurance test program in accordance with this section and 33 CFR 154.2181.
( b ) As used in this section— ( 1 ) Calibration drift or CD means the difference in the analyzer output readings from the established reference value after a stated period of operation during which no unscheduled maintenance, repair, or adjustment took place;
( 2 ) Calibration error or CE means the difference between the gas concentration exhibited by the gas analyzer and the known concentration of the cylinder gas;
( 3 ) Response time or RT means the time interval between the start of a step change in the system input (e.g., change of calibration gas) and the time when the data recording system displays 95 percent of the final stable value; and
( 4 ) Sampling system bias or SSB means the difference between the gas concentrations indicated by the measurement system when a known cylinder gas is introduced at or near the sampling probe and when the same gas is introduced directly to the analyzer.
( c ) All analyzers used in a VCS must be tested for safety system functions, CE, CD, RT, and SSB, in accordance with 33 CFR 154.2181.
( d ) All pressure sensors/switches used in a VCS must be tested for safety system functions, CE and CD, in accordance with 33 CFR 154.2181.
( e ) The facility person in charge must ensure the following: ( 1 ) Calibration of instrumentation using standard procedures provided by the manufacturer or service provider;
( 2 ) Monitoring of all interlocks, alarms, and recording devices for proper operation while instrumentation is being calibrated;
( 3 ) Use of a certified gas standard that is within plus or minus two (2) percent of its certified concentration to calibrate the analyzers; and
( 4 ) Use of a certified secondary standard that is standardized against a primary standard to calibrate the pressure sensors/switches.
( f ) Upon failing any test under 33 CFR 154.2181, the facility person in charge must ensure that all monthly and quarterly tests, including CE, CD, RT, and SSB, are conducted; and until all quarterly tests are completed, the person in charge must ensure that the vapor control alarms and automatic shutdown system are tested no more than 24 hours prior to any transfer or tank barge cleaning operation.
( g ) Analyzers required by 33 CFR 154.2105(a) and (j) and 154.2107(d) and (e) must be checked for calibration using a zero gas and a span gas.
( h ) The facility operator must maintain and make available upon the request of the Commandant and the certifying entity that certifies the VCS the following reliability assurance test program documents for two years: ( 1 ) All test procedures;
( 2 ) The dates of all tests, type of tests made, and who conducted the tests;
( 3 ) Results of the tests, including the “as found” and “as left” conditions; and
( 4 ) A record of the date and time of repairs made.