alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7 Management Agreement Ammended








 Exhibit 10.7

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

SECOND AMENDMENT




THIS AGREEMENT made as of this 25th day of April, 2012




BETWEEN:

ROCAP MARKETING INC., a company duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada, having its registered office at 6490 W Desert Inn Road, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89146 (hereinafter called the “Company”)




AND:

TEZI ADVISORY INC. of 1183 West 7th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (the “Consultant”)




WHEREAS, by agreement dated as of September 1, 2010 (the “Management Agreement”), the Company agreed to engage the Consultant to provide consulting services to the Company for a three year term commencing September 1, 2010 (the “Effective Date”); 




WHEREAS, by amendment to the Management Agreement effective as of the Effective Date (the “First Amended Agreement”), the Company and the Consultant waived the remuneration payable pursuant to sections 3.01 and 3.02 of the Management Agreement from September 1, 2010 until September 30, 2011; and,




WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant now wish to memorialize the events that in actuality took place which resulted in an acceleration of issuance of stock compensation due under the Management Agreement and a reversal of the First Amended Agreement.




NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties hereto have agreed as follows:




1.

The First Amended Agreement is hereby reversed as of the Effective Date.




2.

The Management Agreement is hereby restored to its original terms and conditions, as if the First Amended Agreement had not been entered into.




3.

The remainder of the stock compensation due the Consultant under section 3.02 of the Management Agreement shall be accelerated and due in full as of the Effective Date.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written.




	
	ROCAP MARKETING INC.


	


/s/ Peter Henricsson


	Peter Henricsson, Chief Executive Officer


	


TEZI ADVISORY INC.


	


/s/ Gordon C. McDougall


	Gordon C. McDougall, President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER00-936-001 and ER00-937-001]

      ( print page 35918)    
                    On May 22, 2000, the Commission issued an Order on Rehearing in                     *Southern Energy Delta, L.L.C. and Southern Energy Potrero, L.L.C.,*                     91 FERC ¶ 61,117 (2000). In that order, the Commission granted rehearing, in part, and set the remainder of the dispute for an alternative dispute resolution proceeding. The Commission directed the Director of the Commission's Dispute Resolution Service to convene the parties for the purpose of an alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Accordingly, a convening session will be held to address what processes can be taken to reach a consensual agreement, including whether to use an alternative dispute resolution process and/or an appropriate third party neutral.                

The convening session will be held on June 8, 2000, at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission located at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. The conference will begin at 10:00 a.m. in Hearing Room 7. Moreover, at the request of the parties, the remainder of June 8 as well as June 9 will be available to allow the parties to proceed with settlement discussion if such action is appropriate.

                    All interested parties are invited to attend the convening session. If a party has any questions with respect to the convening session, please contact Richard Miles, the Director of the Dispute Resolution Service or Amy Blauman. His telephone number is 1-877 FERC  ADR (337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is                     *richard.miles@ferc.fed.us.*                     Amy's phone number is 202-208-2143 and her E-mail address is                     *amy.blauman@ferc.fed.us.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14121  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Azonic Corporation (the "Registrant") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

/s/ John Simmonds
-----------------------
John G. Simmonds
Director and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the Registrant)

Dated: August 19, 2005

/s/ Gary Hokkanen
-----------------------
Gary Hokkanen
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer of the Registrant)

Dated: August 19, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Tanox, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I , Nancy T. Chang, Chief
Executive Officer of Tanox, Inc. (Tanox) and Gregory P. Guidroz, Vice President
of Finance of Tanox, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
             13(a) and

         2.  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         3.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
             all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of Tanox.

       Date:  March 15, 2004            By:        /s/ Nancy T. Chang
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                       Nancy T. Chang
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

       Date:  March 15, 2004            By:       /s/ Gregory P. Guidroz
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                      Gregory P. Guidroz
                                                 Vice President of Finance

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement required by section 906, has been provided to
         Tanox, Inc. and will be retained by Tanox, Inc. and furnished to the
         Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.708 Safety/Security Zone; Charleston Harbor and Cooper River, Charleston, SC. ( a ) *Regulated area.* The following boundaries are established as a safety and security zone during specified conditions: ( 1 ) All waters 200 yards ahead and astern and 100 yards to each side of a vessel transporting nuclear materials while the vessel transits from Charleston Harbor Entrance approximate position (32°37.1′ N., 079°35.5′ W.) to the Charleston Naval Weapons Station (position 32-55.4N, 079-56.0W) on the Cooper River. All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD 1983.
( 2 ) All waters within 100 yards of the vessel described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section while the vessel is conducting cargo operations at the Charleston Naval Weapons Station.
( b ) Captain of the Port Charleston will announce the activation of the safety/security zones described in paragraph (a) of this section by Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The general regulations governing safety and security zones contained in §§ 165.23 and 165.33 apply.
[COTP Charleston 96-034, 61 FR 68156, Dec. 27, 1996, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44286, July 27, 2015]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FREDERICK LYNN SELLERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-58-CWH; CA-04-22627-CWH) Submitted: February 8, 2006 Decided: April 3, 2006 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Lynn Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Frederick Lynn Sellers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sellers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Sellers’ motion for a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 127.113 Warning signs. ( a ) The marine transfer area for LNG must have warning signs that— ( 1 ) Meet paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) Can be seen from the shore and the water; and
( 3 ) Have the following text: Warning Dangerous Cargo No Visitors No Smoking No Open Lights
( b ) Each letter in the words on the sign must be— ( 1 ) Block style;
( 2 ) Black on a white background; and
( 3 ) 7.6 centimeters (3 inches) high.
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.338 What are the requirements for immersion suits? ( a ) Each unmanned deepwater port located north of 32 degrees North latitude must comply with the immersion suit requirements applicable to mobile offshore drilling units under 46 CFR 108.580, and immersion suits must be approved under approval series 160.171. Except as under paragraph (b) of this section, the immersion suits need be on the deepwater port only when persons are on board.
( b ) If an attending vessel is moored to the unmanned deepwater port, the suits may be stowed on the vessel, instead of on the deepwater port.
§ 187.321 Application for transfer of ownership or termination of security interest without certificate of title. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in §§ 187.319 and 187.320, if the office receives, unaccompanied by a signed certificate of title, an application for a new certificate that includes an indication of a transfer of ownership or a termination statement, the office may create a new certificate under this section only if— ( 1 ) All other requirements under §§ 187.307 and 187.308 are met;
( 2 ) The applicant provides an affidavit stating facts showing that the applicant is entitled to a transfer of ownership or termination statement;
( 3 ) The applicant provides the office with satisfactory evidence that notification of the application has been sent to the owner of record and all persons indicated in the files of the office as having an interest, including a security interest, in the vessel, at least 45 days have passed since the notification was sent, and the office has not received an objection from any of those persons; and
( 4 ) The applicant submits any other information required by the office as evidence of the applicant's ownership or right to terminate the security interest, and the office has no credible information indicating theft, fraud, or an undisclosed or unsatisfied security interest, lien, or other claim to an interest in the vessel.
( b ) The office may indicate in a certificate of title created under paragraph (a) of this section that the certificate was created without submission of a signed certificate or termination statement. Unless credible information indicating theft, fraud, or an undisclosed or unsatisfied security interest, lien, or other claim to an interest in the vessel is delivered to the office not later than 1 year after creation of the certificate, on request in a form and manner required by the office, the office must remove the indication from the certificate.
DATE: April 29, 2020 

TO: ACL Grantees 

FROM: Rasheed D. Williams 

Deputy Administrator for Management and Budget 

SUBJECT: COVID-19 SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify standard reporting requirements for ACL’s discretionary and 

mandatory grant programs that awarded supplemental funding in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 

(COVID-19). All activities supported by COVID-19 funding must focus on COVID-19 prevention, preparedness, and 

response, in accordance with your program’s requirements, project scope and the following appropriations: 

• Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, 2020 [P.L. 116-136]; and 

• Families First Coronavirus Response Act, 2020 [P.L. 116-127]. 

Over the past few weeks, HHS has been negotiating with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) around the 

reporting requirements identified in the COVID-19 related Acts. As a result, there are no enhanced data collection 

frequencies or new systems required to report the use of funds provided for responding to COVID-19. OMB will 

permit ACL to use existing data and reporting tools to collect information. Specific instructions and technical 

assistance for reporting on COVID-19 activities and expenditures will be provided by your respective program and 

fiscal staff. 

Please remember, it is important during this period of responding to the COVID-19 challenges that you continue to 

adhere to both programmatic and fiscal reporting requirements to help ensure proper oversight of your federal 

award.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amended quarterly Report of Big Sky Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB Amendment No. 2 for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Gaston, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 31, 2005

By: /s/ Bruce Gaston

Name:  Bruce Gaston

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 696 

Designating September 2008 as ‘‘National Youth Court Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2008 as ‘‘National Youth Court 

Month’’. 

Whereas a strong country begins with strong communities in 

which all citizens play an active role and invest in the 

success and future of the youth of the United States; 

Whereas the seventh National Youth Court Month celebrates 

the outstanding achievement of youth courts throughout 

the country; 

Whereas 1,255 youth court programs in 49 States and the 

District of Columbia provide restorative justice for juvenile offenders, resulting in effective crime prevention, 

early intervention, and education for all youth participants, as well as enhanced public safety throughout the 

United States; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 696 ATS 

Whereas, by holding juvenile offenders accountable, reconciling victims, communities, juvenile offenders, and their 

families, and reducing caseloads for the juvenile justice 

system, youth courts address offenses that might otherwise go unaddressed until the offending behavior escalates and redirect the efforts of juvenile offenders toward 

becoming contributing members of their communities; 

Whereas Federal, State, and local governments, corporations, 

foundations, service organizations, educational institutions, juvenile justice agencies, and individual adults support youth courts because youth court programs actively 

promote and contribute to building successful, productive 

lives and futures for the youth of the United States; 

Whereas a fundamental correlation exists between youth service and lifelong adult commitment to, and involvement in, 

one’s community; 

Whereas volunteer service and related service learning opportunities enable young people to build character and develop and enhance life-skills, such as responsibility, decision-making, time management, teamwork, public speaking, and leadership, which prospective employers will 

value; and 

Whereas participating in youth court programs encourages 

youth court members to become valuable members of 

their communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2008 as ‘‘National Youth Court Month’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31(b)2**

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Art P. Beattie, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 4, 2006

/s/Art P. Beattie

Art P. Beattie

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.125 What are the application fees? ( a ) The applicant must submit a nonrefundable application fee of $350,000 with each application for a license. If additional information is necessary to make an application complete, no additional application fee is required.
( b ) The costs incurred by the Federal Government in processing an application will be charged to the application fee until it is exhausted. If the fee is exhausted and the Federal Government incurs further processing costs, the applicant will be charged for the additional costs. The Commandant (CG-5P) will periodically advise the applicant of the status of expenses incurred during the application process.
( c ) Additional costs attributable to processing a deepwater port license application and post-license activities, for example the engineering plan review or development of the final operations manual, are due when they are assessed, and must be paid by the applicant prior to commencing operation of the deepwater port.
( d ) Application fees and additional costs assessed under this section must be made payable to the United States Treasury, and submitted to the Commandant (CG-5P).
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013]