alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-245-001]

Take notice that on May 25, 2000, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company (East Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective May 1, 2000:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 176

East Tennessee asserts that this filing is in compliance with the Commission's May 12, 2000 Letter Order in the above-referenced docket, which required East Tennessee to file revised tariff language to update certain EDI data sets incorporated by reference to GISB Version 1.3.

East Tennessee states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all affected customers and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14077 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.598 Eel Pond Channel. The following requirements apply to the draw of Eel Pond (Water Street) drawbridge at mile 0.0 at Falmouth, Massachusetts. ( a ) The draw shall open at all times as soon as possible for a public vessels of the United States, State or local vessels used for public safety, and vessels in distress. The opening signal for these vessels shall be four or more short blast of a whistle, horn, or radio request.
( b ) The owners of this bridge shall provide and keep in good legible condition clearance gauges for each draw with figures not less than 12 inches high designed, installed and maintained according to the provisions of section 118.160 of this chapter.
( c ) The draw shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) On signal from October 15 through May 14, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. except as provided in paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) Need open on signal only on the hour and half hour as follows: ( i ) From May 15 through June 14 and from September 16 through October 14, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
( ii ) From June 15 through September 15, from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m.
( 3 ) The draw shall open on signal if at least 8 hours advance notice is given: ( i ) At all times on Christmas, New Years, Easter and all Sundays in January and February.
( ii ) At all other times not stipulated in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section.
[CGD1 90-024, 55 FR 20263, May 16, 1990]
### The ground-water flow system in the Snake River Plain, Idaho — An idealized analysis

By: Herbert E. SkibitzkeJose Alves Da Costa

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1536D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Leonard Borow, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of
Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex
Incorporated.





/s/
      Leonard BorowName:  Leonard
      BorowDate:  February
      11,  2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.418 What fire protection system must a helicopter fueling facility have?

In addition to the portable fire extinguishers required under Table 149.409 of this part, each helicopter fueling facility must have a fire protection system complying with 46 CFR 108.489.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39179, July 1, 2013]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Glenn A. Kleinert, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 21, 
2005







/s/ Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 110.55a Five Mile River, Norwalk and Darien, Conn.

The water area of the Five Mile River beginning at a point on the southeast shore of Butler Island at latitude 41°03′27.5′′ N., longitude 73°26′52′′ W.; thence following the shoreline northerly along the westerly side of Five Mile River to the highway bridge at Route 136 (White Bridge); thence easterly along the southerly side of the highway bridge to the easterly side of Five Mile River; thence following the shoreline southerly along the easterly side of Five Mile River to a point on the southwest shore at Rowayton at latitude 41°03′30′′ N., longitude 73°26′47′′ W., thence 242° to the point of beginning, except those areas within the designated project channel as shown by dotted lines on the Five Mile River on Chart No. 12368 (formerly C and GS Chart No. 221) issued by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

[CGD 76-44, 41 FR 40467, Sept. 20, 1976, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Airborne, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl D. Donaway, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Airborne, Inc. and will be retained by Airborne, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|/s/ CARL D. DONAWAY                                  
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Carl D. Donaway Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT (11.2)

              THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

             CALCULATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET EARNINGS PER COMMON
                        AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE (1)

             (All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                          Year Ended December 31
                                                       ----------------------------
                                                         1996      1995      1994
                                                       --------  --------  --------
<S>                                                    <C>       <C>       <C>
NET EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON AND COMMON
 EQUIVALENT SHARES                                     $195,344  $349,972  $701,386
                                                       ========  ========  ========
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING ON A
 FULLY DILUTED BASIS:
  Shares used in calculating primary earnings
   per share                                             53,169    55,293    62,555
 
  Additional dilutive effect of stock options after
   application of treasury stock method                     173         8       172
                                                       --------  --------  --------
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING ON A
 FULLY DILUTED BASIS                                     53,342    55,301    62,727
                                                       ========  ========  ========
FULLY DILUTED NET EARNINGS PER COMMON
 AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE                           $   3.66  $   6.33  $  11.18
                                                       ========  ========  ========
 
</TABLE>

(1) This calculation is submitted in accordance with 17 CFR 229.601(b)(11)
although not required by APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of
less than 3%.

                                      66
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobility Electronics, Inc. (the
"Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joan W.
Brubacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Joan W. Brubacher
---------------------------------------

Joan W. Brubacher
---------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Artemis International Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S.Stefanovich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.                                                      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                                                      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert S. Stefanovich |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Chief  Financial Officer   |
|   | March  30, 2004            |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, an other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

DALLAS TRAHAN

NO. 2023 KW 1165

JANUARY 18, 2024

In Re: Dallas Trahan, applying for supervisory writs, 32nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 

464, 472. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., CHUM AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. Relator failed to meet his burden of proof on

his factual innocence claim. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 2. 

Additionally, the claim is repetitive. See La. Code Crim. P. 

art. 930. 4 ( D) . Accordingly, the district court did not abuse

its discretion by dismissing the application for postconviction

relief in its entirety. 

JMG

WRC

WIL
#### § 784.18 Commerce activities of employees.

The Fair Labor Standards Act has applied since 1938 to all employees, not specifically exempted, who are engaged (a) in interstate or foreign commerce or (b) in the production of goods for such commerce, which is defined to include any closely related process or occupation directly essential to such production (29 U.S.C. 206(a), 207(a); and see §§ 784.12 to 784.15 for definitions governing the scope of this coverage). In general, employees of businesses concerned with fisheries and with operations on seafood and other aquatic products are engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, or in the production of goods for such commerce, as defined in the Act, and are subject to the Act's provisions except as otherwise provided in sections 13(a)(5) and 13(b)(4) or other express exemptions. A detailed discussion of the activities in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce which will bring an employee under the Act is contained in part 776 of this chapter, dealing with general coverage.
§ 138.230 Limits of liability. ( a ) *Vessels.* ( 1 ) The OPA 90 limits of liability for tank vessels, other than edible oil tank vessels and oil spill response vessels, are— ( i ) For a single-hull tank vessel greater than 3,000 gross tons, the greater of $4,000 per gross ton or $29,591,300;
( ii ) For a tank vessel greater than 3,000 gross tons, other than a single-hull tank vessel, the greater of $2,500 per gross ton or $21,521,000;
( iii ) For a single-hull tank vessel less than or equal to 3,000 gross tons, the greater of $4,000 per gross ton or $8,070,400; and
( iv ) For a tank vessel less than or equal to 3,000 gross tons, other than a single-hull tank vessel, the greater of $2,500 per gross ton or $5,380,300.
( 2 ) The OPA 90 limits of liability for any vessel other than a vessel listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, including for any edible oil tank vessel and any oil spill response vessel, are the greater of $1,300 per gross ton or $1,076,000.
( b ) *Deepwater ports.* ( 1 ) The OPA 90 limit of liability for any deepwater port, including for any component pipelines, other than a deepwater port listed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, is $725,710,800;
( 2 ) The OPA 90 limits of liability for deepwater ports with limits of liability established by regulation under OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(d)(2)), including for any component pipelines, are— ( i ) For the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port (LOOP), $110,332,600; and
( ii ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Onshore facilities.* The OPA 90 limit of liability for onshore facilities, including, but not limited to, motor vehicles, rolling stock and onshore pipelines, is $725,710,800.
( d ) *Offshore facilities.* The OPA 90 limit of liability for offshore facilities other than deepwater ports, including for any offshore pipelines, is set forth at 30 CFR 553.702.
[80 FR 72355, Nov. 19, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 39974, Aug. 13, 2019; 87 FR 78864, Dec. 23, 2022]
§ 144.20-5 Exposure suits. This section applies to each MODU except those operating south of 32 degrees North latitude in the Atlantic Ocean or south of 35 degrees North latitude in all other waters. ( a ) Each MODU must carry an exposure suit for each person on board. The exposure suit must be stowed in a readily accessible location in or near the berthing area of the person for whom the exposure suit is provided.
( b ) In addition to the exposure suits required by paragraph (a) of this section, each watch station and work station must have enough exposure suits to equal the number of persons normally on watch in, or assigned to, the station at one time. However, an exposure suit need not be provided at a watch or work station for a person whose cabin, stateroom, or berthing area (and the exposure suits stowed in that location) is readily accessible to the station.
( c ) Each exposure suit on a MODU must be of a type approved under 46 CFR 160.171.
( d ) Each exposure suit must have a personal flotation device light that is approved under 46 CFR 161.012. Each light must be securely attached to the front shoulder area of the exposure suit.
( e ) Each exposure suit on a MODU must be provided with a whistle of the ball type or multi-tone type, of corrosion resistant construction, and in good working order. The whistle must be attached to the exposure suit by a lanyard without hooks, snaps, clips, etc., that is long enough to permit the whistle to reach the mouth of the wearer. If the lanyard allows the whistle to hang below the waist of the wearer, the whistle must be stowed in a pocket on the exposure suit, or with the lanyard coiled and stopped off.
( f ) No stowage container for exposure suits may be capable of being locked.
[CGD 82-075b, 49 FR 4377, Feb. 6, 1984, as amended by CGD 84-090, 50 FR 3904, Jan. 29, 1985; USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40057, June 29, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.139 White River. ( a ) The draws of the St. Louis Southwestern railroad bridge, mile 98.9 at Clarendon, the Missouri Pacific railroad bridge, mile 196.3 at Augusta and the Missouri Pacific railroad bridge, mile 254.8 at Newport, shall open on signal if at least eight hours notice is given. The draws of any of these bridges need not be opened for a vessel that arrives later than two hours after the time specified in the notice, unless a second notice of at least eight hours is given.
( b ) The draws of the Arkansas highway bridge, mile 300.1 at Batesville, and the Missouri Pacific railroad bridge, mile 401.9 at Cotter, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD08-06-005, 72 FR 70879, Dec. 7, 2006; USCG-2018-0443, 83 FR 30038, June 27, 2018]