alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OIL Crops Outlook (PDF Format)
OCS-0399, February 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This report is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831.  A summary in ASCII form was
released on February 12, 1999.

Printed copies are available from the ERS-NASS order desk.  Call, toll-free,
1-800-999-6779 and ask for  Stock #ERS-OCS-0399. ERS-NASS accepts MasterCard
 and Visa.

Please note that this publication is in .PDF format and 25.3 KB in size.
Acrobat Reader 3.0 or later is required to view and print this document.
The Adobe Acrobat .PDF format is used to preserve all the layout and
content used in the original publication. To download and get help using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, please go to:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

For More Information on ERS Publications and Data
*************************************************
Visit the ERS web site at:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov

Other reports are available from the Products and Services
area on the ERS web site from:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/periodic.htm

For sales information on ERS publications, go to:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/sales.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
END_OF_FILE
#### § 785.17 On-call time.

An employee who is required to remain on call on the employer's premises or so close thereto that he cannot use the time effectively for his own purposes is working while “on call”. An employee who is not required to remain on the employer's premises but is merely required to leave word at his home or with company officials where he may be reached is not working while on call. (*Armour & Co.* v. *Wantock,* 323 U.S. 126 (1944); *Handler* v. *Thrasher,* 191 F. 2d 120 (C.A. 10, 1951); *Walling* v. *Bank of Waynesboro, Georgia,* 61 F. Supp. 384 (S.D. Ga. 1945))
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21

                            AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of all subsidiaries of AmSouth Bancorporation and the 
jurisdiction in which they were organized. Each subsidiary does business under 
its own name.

           Name                              Jurisdiction Where Organized
           ----                              ----------------------------

AmSouth Bank of Alabama                         Alabama
  AmSouth Leasing Corporation                   Alabama
  AmSouth Investment Services, Inc.             Alabama
  AmSouth Riverchase, Inc.                      Alabama
  Fifth Avenue Realty Company                   (unincorporated joint venture)
  First Gulf Insurance Agency, Inc.             Alabama
  Five Points Capital Advisors, Inc.            Alabama
  National Properties and Mining Company, Inc.  Delaware

AmSouth of Louisiana, Inc.                      Louisiana

Alabanc Properties, Inc.                        Delaware

AmSouth Bank of Florida                         Florida
  AmSouth Insurance Agency, Inc.                Florida
  AmSouth Retirement Services, Inc.             Florida
  Fortune Mortgage Corporation                  Florida
  Service Mortgage and Insurance Agency, Inc.   Florida

AmSouth Bank of Georgia                         Georgia

Amsouth Bank of Tennessee                       Tennessee
  FMLS, Inc.                                    Tennessee

AmSouth Bank of Walker County                   Alabama

Trivest Enterprises, Inc.                       Florida

Fortune Equity Corporation                      Florida
  First Clearwater Corporation                  Florida
#### Rachel, a girl of color, by next friend *vs*Emerson.

Error to the Cumberland County Court.

Motion.

*Case*55.

The ease stated.

The obligation to teach colored ap-

*Apprentices. Free persons of color.*

*Oct. 25.*

Chief Justice Ewing

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a proceeding by which the County Court, by its order, bound Rachel, a free girl of color, to Emerson. It appears by the record, that A. G. Waggener, at the September term of the County Court of Cumberland, ap. peared in open Court, and relinquished all right, title, and control over Rachel, who was bound to him by the Court at the August term, 1837, and desiied that the Court might take said girl under its jurisdiction and control. Whereupon, by the order of the Court, without summons or notice to the next friend, or person with whom the child resided, as required by the statute, Rachel was bound to Emerson until she arrived at the age of eighteen, to learn the art of house keeping, and indentures were accordingly executed. Rachel has brought the case to this Court by writ of error, and her counsel assigns for error, that the statute has not been pursued in the summons required, nor does the indenture contain a covenant to teach the girl how to spell and read.

The covenant insisted on by the counsel, is dispensed with by the statute of 1843. But the statute expressly *281requires that the “next friend, or person with whom the poor child of color shall reside, shall be first summoned.” This we regard as a substantial pre-requisite to the action of the Court, as the means of securing the infant against an *ex fade*proceeding, and affording protection to its rights. It is true, if the next friend or person with whom the infant resides at the time, appears in Court and yields his or her consent, a summons is not necessary. But the order, to be valid, should show these facts.

prentices ^ to read, is dispensed with by the statute of 1843. Persons of color cannot be bound apprentices by County Court, without summoning the next friend or person with whom such person lives, to appear in Court to show cause against the binding out such person—

—Unless there be a voluntary appearance of such next friend, which the record should show.

*B, A. Monroe*for plaintiff.

It does not show, in this case, either that Waggener was the next friend, or that Rachel resided with him at the time. She had been bound to him in 1837,. but whether she was, at the time of the order, residing with him or not, does not appear. It might, perhaps, be inferred that she was, but the Court should not base its action upon inference or conjecture, in a matter so important to the rights of the infant. She, though colored, has a right to be heard by her next friend or person with whom she resides, and the order should show that the one or the other, in the character designated by the statute, was summoned or appeared in Court.

The order of the County Court is reversed, and the cause remanded, that the same may be set aside and the indentures annulled.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 


WASHINGTON, D. C. 


Application of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-2007­

0095 

under 49 USC 40109 for exemption 

(U.S.-Israel authority for codesharing with El AI) 

AMENDMENT TO 


APPLICATION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 


FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 


Communications with respect to s document should be sent to: 

VIRASB VAHIDI WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. 

Senior Vice President - Senior Vice President ­

Planning Government Af irs 


American rlines, Inc. Ame can Airlines, Inc. 


P.O. Box 619616, MD 5634 1101 17th Street, N.W. 

DFW rport, Texas 75161 Washington, D.C. 20036 

KENJI C. HASHIMOTO CARL B. NELSON, JR. 

Vice President - Strategic Associate General Counsel 

Alliances American Airl s, Inc. 

American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635 Washington, D.C. 20036 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 (202) 496 5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

ROBERT A. WIRICK 

Director, Regulatory 

American Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

(817) 963-0394 

robert.wirick@aa.com 

February 24, 2010 
BEFORE THE 


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 


WASHINGTON, D. C. 


Application of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 00T-OST-2007­

0095 

under 49 USC 40109 for exemption 

(U.S.-Israel authority for codesharing with El AI) 

AMENDMENT TO 


APPLICATION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 


FOR RENEWAL OF EXEMPTION 


American Airlines, Inc. hereby amends the renewal 

application it submitted in this docket on January 20, 2010, 

which requested exemption autho ty between the United States 

and Israel. By this amendment, American seeks exemption 

authority between the United States and Israel and beyond, 

consistent with initial Notice of Action Taken issued on 

March 28, 2008 (p. 2). 

Respectfully submitted, 

CARL B. NELSON, JR. 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

February 24, 2010 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certi 

document by email on the 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

scott.mcclain@delta.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com 

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com 

bkeiner@crowell.com 

mrosia@crowell.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com 

msinick@ssd.com 

cdonley@ssd.com 

anbird@fedex.com 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com 

mroller@rollerbauer.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

amin.slocum@usairways.com 

sophy.chen@hklaw.com 

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com 

February 24, 2010 

have this day served the foregoing 

persons: 

jhill@dlalaw.com 

bill@mietuslaw.com 

mgoldman@sgbdc.com 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

mcmillin@woa.com 

eskraft@jamhoff.com 

dpdean@jamhoff.com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com 

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

.moore@ustranscom.mil 

jim.ballough@faa.gov 

r@state.gov 

recohn@hhlaw.com 

zsrlaw.com 

lopmurphy.com 

lachter@starpower.net 

anita.mosner@h~law.com 

atlasair.com 

crowell. com 

russell.bailey@alpa.org
Opinion filed January 16, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-14-00011-CR

___________

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State of Texas filed an application for emergency stay and writ of 

mandamus relating to trial court cause nos. 13-4347, 13-4370, and 13-4373 in the 

106th District Court of Gaines County. The State has now filed in this court a 

motion for dismissal. In the motion, the State verified that all outstanding issues in 

this proceeding “have been resolved to the satisfaction of all parties, and no further 

assistance is required” from this court. The motion is signed by the district 

attorney.

The State’s motion for dismissal is granted, and this proceeding is dismissed.

January 16, 2014 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.111 Mobile River. ( a ) The draw of the CSX Transportation Railroad bridge, mile 13.1 near Hurricane, AL shall be remotely operated by the bridge tender at CSX's bridge remote control center in Mobile, AL and shall open promptly and fully when signaled to open. Vessels can contact the CSX bridge tender via VHF-FM channel 13 or by telephone at the number displayed on the signs posted at the bridge to request an opening of the draw.
( b ) CSX will return the tender to the bridge location within 3 hours following any of the below situations: ( 1 ) Any component of the remote operations system fails and prevents the remote operator from being able to visually identify vessels, communicate with vessels, detect vessels immediately underneath the bridge or visually identify trains approaching the bridge;
( 2 ) CSX fails to meet Federal Railway Administration (FRA) or any other government agency safety requirements;
( 3 ) Anytime at the direction of the District Commander.
[USCG-2019-0911, 87 FR 42645, July 18, 2022]
Senior Nutrition Program

Prioritizing Participants

Why prioritize?

More than ever, it is the RIGHT time to prioritize.

• Reach. Expand program reach to seniors with unmet needs.

• Innovate. Plan for unexpected changes in food or funding.

• Grow. Respond to the growing number of older Americans.

• Help. Serve people with greatest need for nutrition services.

• Target. Give multi-level outcome data to stakeholders/decisionmakers.

Prioritization System

• Consider creating a workgroup to lead implementation and training.

• If possible, use an existing prioritization model and tool. 

• Statewide or otherwise unified policies and tools are ideal.

• Ensure the prioritization system includes a monitoring plan.

• A user-friendly, fair, and reliable screening tool is essential to prioritizing.

Screening Tips

• Screening is different and simpler than assessment.

• Focus on eligibility and tailor screening criteria to serve the most at-risk seniors.

• Criteria are program-specific but may include factors such as:

• ADLs/IADLs

• Malnutrition

• Food security

• Chronic health conditions

• Transportation access

• Existing supports/services

• Mock screening exercises can help to identify potential problems.

Waitlist Considerations

• Assign a waitlist manager and select/develop a tracking tool.

• Decide on waitlist criteria for additions and removals.

• Develop a list of other resources for clients on the waitlist.

• Make a communication schedule for people who are waiting.

• Train staff on the waitlist processes.

• Consider how to use data beyond the waitlist’s primary purpose.

• Evaluate the waitlist process and make improvements.

Recommended Resources 

• Detailed How-To: Senior Nutrition Program’s Guide to Prioritizing Clients

• Sample Food Security Screener: UMD Prioritization Tool

• Referral Chart: Federal Nutrition Programs and Emergency Food

• Further Resources: seniornutrition.acl.gov

Next Steps

Develop a top-line 

prioritization plan 

description.

Pitch the value 

and approach to 

decisionmakers.

Get consensus and 

commit to prioritizing.

Inform and involve 

stakeholders, including 

partners.

Assign a Prioritization 

Manager and, if 

applicable, establish a 

workgroup.

Develop/customize a 

detailed prioritization 

plan and tools.

Verify the plan meets 

all relevant program 

requirements/

regulations.

Initiate implementation 

of the prioritization plan 

and conduct training.

The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services. ACL administers the National Senior Nutrition Program, which is funded by the Older Americans Act. ACL.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule
9 Months Ending September 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          1075055
<NAME>                        KENWICK INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              10,261
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,604,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        987,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              88,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,746,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            11,947
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,907,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,746,772
<SALES>                                          6,207,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,207,374
<CGS>                                            5,513,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    47,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 279,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    616,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                       301,379
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       315,498
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.03





</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 642 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee 

on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2008 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent 

Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs conducted an investigation into tax haven financial institutions, their formation and administration of 

offshore entities and accounts for use by U.S. clients, and 

the impact of those activities on tax compliance in the 

United States; 

Whereas the Subcommittee has received a number of requests 

from law enforcement and regulatory agencies for access 

to records of the Subcommittee’s investigation; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 642 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority 

2 Member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investiga3 tions of the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern4 mental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to provide 

5 to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and 

6 other entities or individuals duly authorized by Federal, 

7 State, or foreign governments, records of the Subcommit8 tee’s investigation into tax haven financial institutions, 

9 their formation and administration of offshore entities and 

10 accounts for use by U.S. clients, and the impact of those 

11 activities on tax compliance in the United States. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
**Protect, Detect, and Report**

*Three steps you can take to guard against Medicare fraud*

Every day, Medicare fraud affects people with Medicare and their families across the U.S. – regardless of background. It’s not just the Medicare program that suffers when fraud occurs. Patients may also discover that they can’t get the health care they need.

If someone gets your Medicare number, they can make charges that may exhaust your allotment of benefits. If they charge Medicare for medical visits that you never made or equipment you didn’t purchase, your number could be flagged for overuse, and doctors may refuse to see you. These are just two examples of how fraud can end up hurting you directly.

Scammers know the ins and outs of the Medicare system and their attempts can be well thought-out. It’s not always easy to know when and where fraud is occurring. By remembering some simple but effective tips, you can protect yourself against scams, including identity theft and prescription drug fraud. Remembering to protect, detect, and report fraud helps everyone, including you.

1. **Protect**

Protecting your personal information is your best line of defense against health care fraud. Treat Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security numbers like credit card numbers. Never give them to a stranger and don’t carry your cards unless you need them for appointments. Medicare doesn’t call or visit to sell you anything. Outside of a trusted health care setting, never give this information to anyone who asks for it.

2. **Detect**

No matter how careful you are, you may be targeted for fraud. Always review your Medicare statements closely. Things to look for include charges for something you didn’t purchase or receive, duplicate charges, and charges for services not ordered by your doctor. Compare these documents to your personal records and receipts. Recording medical visits and procedures in a journal or on a calendar can help you keep track of what happened at each appointment and make it easier to spot inaccuracies. 

3. **Report**

If you suspect you’ve been a target of fraud, report it. This can help you and others at risk for fraud. If you have questions about your Medicare statements, call your health care provider. 

If you’re uncomfortable calling or are not satisfied with the response, help is available through your local Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP). SMP volunteers work with Medicare beneficiaries and their families and caregivers to stop health care fraud, errors, and abuse. You can also report suspicious calls and ask general questions through this resource.  You can find your local SMP program by calling 1-877-808-2468 or at SMPresource.org.

Suspected fraud also can be reported to 1-800-Medicare or by calling 1-800-HHS-TIPS.

**Don’t hesitate, if you need help.**

Funded by the Administration for Community Living, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the SMP programs provide outreach, counseling, and education by highly trained volunteers in a variety of locations. For free, confidential support, contact your local SMP program.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.731 Mullica River. The draws of the bridges listed in this section shall open on signal, except as follows: ( a ) The draw of the Lower Bank bridge, mile 15.0, need not open during the following periods unless at least four hours notice is given: ( 1 ) From May 1 through November 30, from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m.
( 2 ) From December 1 through April 30, at all times.
( b ) The draw of the Green Bank bridge, mile 18.0, need not open unless at least four hours notice is given during the following periods: ( 1 ) April 1 through November 30, from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m.
( 2 ) December 1 through March 31, at all times.
( c ) The drawspan must open as soon as possible for public vessels of the United States during the periods when four hours notice is required.
[CGD5-87-065, 53 FR 406, Jan. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD05 94-093, 60 FR 51732, Oct. 3, 1995. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70311, Dec. 4, 2006]