alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Ferrer, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial position and result of operations of the Company.

 

In renderingthis certification, I note that information in the Report relates to periodsprior to Maria Henry’s affiliation with the Company, as disclosed in theCompany’s Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2002.  Ms. Henry joined the Company on October 14, 2002 as its ChiefFinancial Officer.

 
| /s/ Mark J.  Ferrer                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| Mark J.  Ferrer                        |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14,  2002                     |

 

----
Argued and submitted December 7,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing December 30, 1992,

appellant’s petition for reconsideration denied April 21,

petition for review denied June 22, 1993 (317 Or 163)

respondent’s motion for reconsideration allowed by opinion April 21, 1993

See 119 Or App 494 (1993)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DWAYNE JOHNSON, *Appellant.*

(91-832-C-1; CA A71401)

842 P2d 819

Gary D. Babcock, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*532PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for two counts of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and criminal trespass in the first degree, ORS 164.255. We affirm the convictions without discussion and write only to address the sentence.

The court “merged” the convictions and sentenced defendant to 30 years under the dangerous offender statute, ORS 161.725, with a 15-year minimum term. The court imposed an alternative 20-year sentence under the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes that the court erred in imposing an indeterminate sentence under the dangerous offender statute. *State v. Serhienko,*111 Or App 604, 826 P2d 114 (1992). We accept that concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2007

Mr. McConnell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. McCain, Mr. Alexander, 
   Mr. Allard, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
    Brown, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burr, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 
  Chambliss, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Coleman, Ms. 
 Collins, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Ensign, 
 Mr. Feingold, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
   Kerry, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. 
     Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lott, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Martinez, Mrs. 
McCaskill, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
Obama, Mr. Reid, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Smith, Ms. 
    Snowe, Mr. Specter, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Sununu, Mr. 
  Voinovich, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
renewal of the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the 
Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 788.3 Purpose of this part.

The purpose of this part is to make available in one place the views of the Department of Labor with respect to the application and meaning of the provisions of section 13(a)(13) of the Act which will provide “a practical guide to employers and employees as to how the office representing the public interest in enforcement of the law will seek to apply it” (*Skidmore* v. *Swift & Co.,* 324 U.S. 134).
ACL Developmental Disabilities Protection and Advocacy (PADD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2019 Estimated Allocation

6/8/2018

FY 2019: 100 percent new formula

Disclaimer: ACL is aware the President's proposed FY 2019 budget 

is below the final Congressional appropriations for FY 2018. 

Awards for FY 2019 will be made based on the approved FY 2019 

Congressional Appropriations.

State/Territory

FY 2018 Actual 

Grant Amounts FY 2019 Estimates

Alabama 578,212 474,141

Alaska 404,556 404,556

Arizona 746,747 703,088

Arkansas 410,767 404,556

California 3,730,779 3,829,418

Colorado 492,364 475,954

Connecticut 409,502 407,922

Delaware 404,556 404,556

District of Columbia 404,556 404,556

Florida 2,066,218 1,917,499

Georgia 1,110,944 1,022,490

Hawaii 404,556 404,556

Idaho 404,556 404,556

Illinois 1,292,508 1,216,942

Indiana 699,654 580,318

Iowa 404,556 404,556

Kansas 404,556 404,556

Kentucky 536,407 445,875

Louisiana 558,966 497,089

Maine 404,556 404,556

Maryland 534,545 534,825

Massachusetts 647,433 621,524

Michigan 1,093,387 879,757

Minnesota 529,282 492,066

Mississippi 429,754 414,654

Missouri 656,217 559,191

Montana 404,556 404,556

Nebraska 404,556 404,556

Nevada 404,556 404,556

New Hampshire 404,556 404,556

New Jersey 808,962 794,113

New Mexico 404,556 404,556

New York 1,923,114 1,853,689

North Carolina 1,091,960 949,882

North Dakota 404,556 404,556

Ohio 1,290,170 1,150,775

Oklahoma 417,604 407,192

Oregon 425,209 404,556

Pennsylvania 1,337,666 1,212,115

Rhode Island 404,556 404,556

South Carolina 554,239 463,150

South Dakota 404,556 404,556

Tennessee 719,167 615,889

Texas 2,703,555 2,639,231

Utah 404,556 404,556

Vermont 404,556 404,556

Virginia 788,673 754,387

Washington 694,618 676,412

West Virginia 404,556 404,556

Wisconsin 598,542 506,007

Wyoming 404,556 404,556

American Samoa 216,435 216,435

Guam 216,435 216,435

Northern Mariana Islands 216,435 216,435

Puerto Rico 825,982 798,440

Virgin Islands 216,435 216,435

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. 216,435 216,435

TOTAL $39,876,442 $37,876,442
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1491. MARILYN E. GOODRICH v. ELLEN S. GOODRICH.

Marilyn E. Goodrich filed suit against Ellen S. Goodrich in Cobb County State

Court. On December 6, 2018, the trial court entered an order transferring venue to

Baldwin County. The order provided that, if transfer costs were not paid within two

weeks, the case would stand dismissed. On January 15, 2019, Marilyn Goodrich filed

a notice of appeal purporting to challenge a December 26, 2019 dismissal. We lack

jurisdiction. 

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the order on

appeal. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an

absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Couch v. United

Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Here, Marilyn

Goodrich filed her notice of appeal 40 days after entry of the order she seeks to

appeal. 

Furthermore, it is well-settled that a court order transferring a case from one

trial court to another is not a final judgment, as the case remains pending below,

albeit in a different court.

1

 See In the Interest of W. L., 335 Ga. App. 561, 563 (782

SE2d 464) (2016); Griffith v. Georgia Bd. of Dentistry, 175 Ga. App. 533 (333 SE2d

647) (1985). Therefore, to appeal the transfer order, Marilyn Goodrich was required

1

In construing orders, substance controls. See Forest City Gun Club v.

Chatham County, 280 Ga. App. 219, 220 (633 SE2d 623) (2006). Although Marilyn

Goodrich suggests the court’s order constitutes a dismissal order, it is properly

construed as a transfer order. 

March 12, 2019
to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), which

include obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court and filing an

appropriate application to this Court. Griffith, supra; see also Mauer v. Parker

Fibernet, LLC, 306 Ga. App. 160, 161 (701 SE2d 599) (2010). Because Marilyn

Goodrich failed to do so, her appeal is premature.2

For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2 Marilyn Goodrich has had a prior direct appeal in a separate action dismissed

on this exact basis. See Goodrich v. Goodrich, Case No. A18A1145, dismissed

February 28, 2018.

03/12/2019
xr_ex105.htm


EXHIBIT 10.5




 





 


 


Compensation  Agreement between XR Energy Inc. and East Cost Power and Gas (EC P&G)


 


Variable price products will pay out to XR Energy $0.04 (Four cents) net, per therm on the twentieth of the following month for the previous months meter reading.


 


Price each month, for XR Energy clients, will be determined by EC P&G and forwarded to XR Energy by E-mail. the Data used to determine  price will be EC P&G wholesale cost including: 1) The cost of Gas 2) Transportation to the appropriate City Gate 3) Utility pass through costs 4) Transportation management fee's plus $0.17 net. ($0.I 3 to EC P&G and $0.04 to
XR Energy) per therm.


 


If market conditions allow for an increase in the price above the $0.17 markup to our clients, the new mark-up will be agreed upon by EC P&G and XR Energy, prior to billing of.XR Energy clients.


 


EC P&G agrees not to solicit XR Energy clients without prior notification and agreement.


 


XR Energy clients are free to switch to any ESCO it wishes without penalty or prejudice, unless committed to a long term fixed contract.




 


 







 


 


 


373 Smithtown Bypass.   Ste.l98  Hauppauge, NY 11788


Phone: (631) 913-8090  Fax: (631) 930-3960


www.xrenegy.com
FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CHS/ COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 OF THE 

CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. 401(K) PLAN 
 July 1, 2011 
 WHEREAS, CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) has previously established and currently maintains the CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to eliminate the current prohibition against accepting any Roth Elective Deferrals as part of any rollovers from other tax-qualified plans; and

 WHEREAS, the Company has the right to amend the Plans; and 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has approved of the changes set forth in this Amendment. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be and the same is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Effective July 1, 2011, Section 4 12(a) of the Plan will read as follows: 


Acceptance of rollovers into the Plan. This section applies to a rollover from an eligible retirement plan into this Plan made on
or after January 1, 2002. With the consent of the Administrator (such consent must be exercised in a nondiscriminatory manner and applied uniformly to all Participants), the Plan may accept a rollover (including, for Acquired Employees only,
loans) by Participants, excluding Participants who are no longer employed as an Employee and including Eligible Employees, provided the rollover will not jeopardize the tax-exempt status of the Plan or create adverse tax consequences for the
Employer. The Rollover Account of a Participant shall be 100% Vested at all times and shall not be subject to Forfeiture for any reason. 
  

	 	2.	Except as otherwise provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment of the Plan has been executed on the 11th day of July, 2011. 

 

			
	CHS/COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Rachel A. Seifert
	Its:	 	 RACHEL A. SEIFERT
 EXECUTIVE
VICE PRESIDENT




  
 -1-
# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5257 September Term, 2022 1: 22-c v -005 75-UNA Filed O n: April 26 , 20 23 Karl Ray Masek,

App ellant
v . Rob I sont a, A ttorn ey Gene ral, etal.,

App ellees
ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Pillard an d Childs, Circuit Jud ges, an d S ent elle, S enio r Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l w as co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Ju ly 29 , 20 22 orde r be af f irmed . T he district cou rt did notab use its discretio n b y dism issing the ca se without prejud ice after a ppe llant tw ice failed to co mp ly w ith co urt o rders th at h e f ile a co mp liant am end ed com plaint . S ee Ripalda v. Am. Ope ration s Corp., 97 7 F.2 d 1 464 , 14 66 (D.C. Cir. 199 2). A lthou gh app ellantha s att ache d to his b rief a p ropo sed am end ed com plaint , he did notf ile this co mp laint in district co urt a nd has notexplained w hy he could no t ha v e tim ely done so.

# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5257 September Term, 2022
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmSouth Bancorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, C. Dowd Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Alton E. Yother, Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/    C. DOWD RITTER   |  |  |  | /s/    ALTON E. YOTHER                                           
|C. Dowd Ritter          |  |  |  | Alton E. Yother                                                  
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller



May
9, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AmSouth
Bancorporation and will be retained by AmSouth Bancorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

ENDORSEMENT NO. 3

Attached to and made a part of the

PROPERTY PER RISK EXCESS OF LOSS
REINSURANCE AGREEMENT NO. 5320-01A/01B

between

NATIONAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION
Stamford, Connecticut
(hereinafter referred to as the "REINSURER")

and

MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY
Los Angeles, California
(hereinafter referred to as the "COMPANY")
<PAGE>
 
                                       2



IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that effective at 12:01 a.m., April 1, 1995, Exclusion
10.b., appearing, in ADDENDUM A - EXCLUSIONS, is deleted and replaced by the
following:

     b. The peril of earthquake, when written as such;

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Endorsement No. 3
to be executed in  Los Angeles, California, in duplicate this            day
of             , 1995.

                           MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY


                           ________________________


ATTEST:
       _______________________________________

And in Stamford, Connecticut, this          day of                  , 1995.


                              NATIONAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION


                              ________________________________
                                   Second Vice President
 

ATTEST:
       _______________________________________
1998

-  Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports, November 1998, AES-20   [Summary | Text | PDF Info | PDF 75.8kB] Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports, August 1998, AES-19 
 [Summary |
 Text]
-  Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports, May 1998, AES-18   [Summary |   Text]   Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports, February 1998, AES-17  [Summary | Text]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of High Speed Access Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
E. Willett, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 14, 2002                      By /s/ George E. Willett
      ---------------                         ----------------------------------
                                           George E. Willett
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 785.46 Applicable regulations governing keeping of records.

Section 11(c) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to promulgate regulations requiring the keeping of records of hours worked, wages paid and other conditions of employment. These regulations are published in part 516 of this chapter. Copies of the regulations may be obtained on request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.59 Special requirements due to hazards.

For the duration of occurrences hazardous to safety or navigation, such as floods, freshets, and damage to the bridge or fender system, the District Commander may require the owner of an operational drawbridge listed in this subpart to have the bridge attended full time and open on signal.
```

[House Report 111-25]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     111-25

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 38) 
MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2009, AND 
                           FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

    March 6, 2009.--Referred to the House and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 219]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 219, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 38, 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 
2009, and for other purposes, under a closed rule. The 
resolution provides one hour of general debate in the House 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations.
    The resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the joint resolution (except for clause 10 of 
rule XXI). The resolution waives all points of order against 
provisions in the joint resolution. The resolution also 
provides that the joint resolution shall be considered as read. 
The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the joint resolution contains no earmarks, the 
waiver of all points of order (except for clause 10 of rule 
XXI) against consideration of the joint resolution includes a 
waiver of clause 9 of rule XXI. Although the rule waives all 
points of order against provisions in the joint resolution, the 
Committee is not aware of any points of order. The waiver is 
prophylactic.

                                  

```