alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Eastgate Acquisitions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoff Williams, Chief Executive Officer Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   Geoff Williams





Geoff Williams


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Accounting Officer


March 14, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eononblo 8. C. llleon 

County Auditoa 

arsy oounty 

Peapa, Teur 

lond and took 

note whloh rerilage or payar8 from date- - - 

fund or uneamod lnterert fraa May 3 to Awuat 

whioh had been paid in l dvanoo. The noney ham 

1, 

bsm plaoed in the Coumtr Avaflablo 3ohool &d. 

“I l uauno that, un6rr the tarma of the note 

above quotr(L, the NO? oan make payment et w 

tina aa& stop the aoorulag of lntenst Ron that 

date. Uill you a&ire IPI whrthar I'm rorreot 

in thlr assumption an3 whether there .ir any reguthe 
Boaorablo R. 0. Wl18on, page 2 

latlon whioh would prevent the return oi unearned 

lnterert uhloh ha8 boon doporfted la thr Oountr 

Available Sohool RumI." 

L oounty lr re8ted wlth the title to lada whloh 

hate bmm granted to It ror eluoationdl purporaae (Conat& 

tution, .etlole VII, seotion 6) It mtq reu or dispoao or 

thoa in wholo or in part, in the manner to b provided by 

the Oomdaslonera~ Oourt. (qonstltutlon, Article ?ll, Seotion 6r Art1018 2824, Vernon+8 Annotated Clrll Statutes) 

TZWA the raot8 stated in pIr letter, we a8sun8 

that tronty p ta rha a rl xplred e iron an4 rlnoe the bata or 

the oontrrot involve&. Aooordlry to the term or tho oontraot, 

the lnterert war payable annual.4 in l dva no e. Vhen the lntsreat wm p p lin d l &anoe, it ma aid in 8ompZdanor with 

the rontreot. On August 1 1940 tie mnkoc or the note 

above nantloned paid the l&e‘; for one year in cldrani~e. 

On May 3, 194l, the mekrr or aalA note paaid the entire prlae&pal or the note. We 40 not think that thl8 would ohaqe 

or alter the prorl8$onr or the oontraot whloh provided that, 

the iIltCF86t w6‘ to be pal& uUmil)g in adtanoo. Themfox%, 

it 1s our oplnlon that there is uo'authority l uthorltiry the 

rerun4 or return or any portion or ‘:le lntcm8t to the party 

paying the mme when paid in oompl.&~r with the oontrtot. 

Your8 rer$ truly 

Atim OEwtRAL Of T&s 

Ardell .kllllam8 

A“l‘tant
[673 NE2d 1240, 651 NYS2d 13]

#### In the Matter of Judith A. Carney.

Decided October 15, 1996

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Judith A. Carney is suspended with pay, effective immediately, *1040from her office of Justice of the Dansville Town Court, Steuben County, pending disposition of her request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bella - casa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 4.3(b)

                         LIFEPOINT ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

                                                 May 11, 1999

Reference is hereby made to the Purchase Agreement, dated May 4, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), between Healthtrust, Inc.-The Hospital Company ("Healthtrust") and
the Initial Purchasers named therein.  Unless otherwise defined herein, terms
defined in the Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given them in
the Agreement.

LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. ("LifePoint") hereby unconditionally and irrevocably
expressly assumes, confirms and agrees to perform and observe as the "Company"
each and every of the covenants, agreements, terms, conditions, obligations,
appointments, duties, promises and liabilities of Healthtrust under the
Agreement, and upon the Business being validly transferred to LifePoint, the
assumption by LifePoint of the indebtedness evidenced by the Securities and
Healthtrust and LifePoint executing and delivering this LifePoint Assumption
Agreement, Healthtrust shall fully, unconditionally and irrevocably be released
of all covenants, agreements, terms, conditions, obligations, appointment,
duties, promises and liabilities under the Agreement.

Each of the undersigned hereby agrees to promptly execute and deliver any and
all further documents and take such further action as the other undersigned
party or the Representative may reasonably require to effect the purpose of this
LifePoint Assumption Agreement.

This LifePoint Assumption Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

                                          HEALTHTRUST, INC.-THE HOSPITAL
                                          COMPANY


                                          By:  /s/  R. Milton Johnson
                                             --------------------------------
                                                Name:  R. Milton Johnson
                                                Title:  Vice President


                                          LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.


                                          By:  /s/  William F. Carpenter III
                                             --------------------------------
                                                Name:  William F. Carpenter III
                                                Title:  Vice President
el20120705-ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1





 


CONSULTING AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE







This CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (the "First Amendment") is made by and between, Dennis J. Selkoe, M.D. (“Consultant”), an individual with an address of Center for Neurologic Diseases, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, HIM 730, Boston, MA 02115, and Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation with an address of 180 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, California 94080 ("Elan"), and is effective as of 1 July 2012 (“Amendment Effective Date”).







RECITALS







A.           Elan and Consultant entered into a Consulting Agreement dated 01 July 2009 (the “Agreement”).


 


B.           The parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement.


 


AGREEMENT







1.            TERM.  The term of the Agreement shall be extended to expire on 01 July 2015.







2.            FEES AND EXPENSES.  As of the Amendment Effective Date, Section 3(a) of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:


 


(a)      In return for Services actually rendered, Elan will pay Consultant at a rate of $18,000.00 per quarter.


 


3.            Except as modified herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and is hereby incorporated by this reference.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings contained in the Agreement.















































 


 




 












[Signature page follows]


 









  





  











  





















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.


 




 




	ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.  	 	DENNIS J. SELKOE, M.D.
	 	 	 
	
By:        /s/ John B. Moriarty, Jr.

	 	
By:      /s/ Dennis J. Selkoe


	 	 	 
	
Name:   John B. Moriarty, Jr.

	 	
 


	 	 	 
	
Title:     SVP & General Counsel 

	 	
 









 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


2
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.571 Spa Creek. The S181 bridge, mile 0.4, at Annapolis, Maryland: ( a ) From May 1 to October 31, Monday through Friday, except Federal and State holidays: ( 1 ) The draw shall remain closed from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., except the draw shall open at 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. for any vessels waiting to pass.
( 2 ) The draw shall open on the hour and the half-hour, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
( 3 ) The draw shall open on the hour and half hour, from 7:30 p.m. to 7:30 a.m.
( b ) From November 1 to April 30, Monday through Friday, except Federal and State holidays: ( 1 ) The draw shall remain closed from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
( 2 ) The draw shall open on signal from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 a.m.
( c ) On Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays year-round, the draw shall open on the hour and half-hour for vessels waiting to pass. Except on July 4th of every year from 8:30 p.m. to 11 p.m., the draw need not open for vessels, and in the event of inclement weather, the alternate date is July 5th.
( d ) The drawspan must always open on signal for public vessels of the United States.
[CGD5-90-002, 55 FR 4604, Feb. 9, 1990, as amended by CGD05-94-08, 59 FR 44316, Aug. 29, 1994; CGD05-04-052, 69 FR 63066, Oct. 29, 2004; USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70311, Dec. 4, 2006; USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37314, June 21, 2012]
Hillsborough County Probate Court

No. 7490

#### *In re*Estate of Elizabeth B. Gault

August 31, 1976

*J. Colin Lizotte*for the administratrix, filed no brief.

*Frank B. Clancy,*guardian ad litem, filed no brief.

Memorandum Opinion

This is a petition for instructions filed following a proposed decree of distribution in the estate of Elizabeth B. Gault and certified to this court under the provisions of RSA 547:30 by the Probate Court *(Copadis,*J.)

The decedent Elizabeth B. Gault died intestate survived by two grandnieces and two grandnephews (descendants of the only known sibling of the decedent who left issue) and one first cousin. The report of the guardian ad litem indicates that a half-brother *526of the decedent, born in 1859, was last heard of in Fort Worth, Texas, prior to 1901. Advertisements seeking information concerning the brother or any heirs of the brother in New Hampshire and Fort Worth newspapers were unproductive, as was a search undertaken by a Boston genealogical service.

The questions transferred ask us to determine whether the one half of the estate which would have been payable to the brother had he survived should be paid to the State treasurer under the provision of RSA 561:10; or the entire estate distributed in equal shares to the grandnephews and grandnieces; or whether the cousin shares equally with the grandnephews and grandnieces?

The probate file in this case indicates that after allowance of the final account, there remains in excess of $100,000 for distribution to the heirs. Counsel have entered appearances in the probate court for the grandnephews and grandnieces and separate counsel appeared there for the first cousin.

From a cursory review of the questions transferred, it appears they may involve substantial questions of law. We are not disposed to determine the law in this case involving adversary interests in the absence of any briefs. *See McNamara v. MacCormac,*113 N.H. 540, 309 A.2d 916 (1973); *Chasan v. Chasan,*115 N.H. 613, 347 A.2d 178 (1975); *Connecticut Valley Constr. Co. v. State,*115 N.H. 247, 339 A.2d 11 (1975). *See also In re Peterson Estate,*104 N.H. 508, 190 A.2d 418 (1963).

The petition in this case will be dismissed November 1, 1976, unless briefs have been filed before that date.

*Dismissed nisi.*

Grimes, J., did not sit.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 99

                       [KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Letterhead]


                               Form 10-Q, Part II
                                     Item 6
                                   Exhibit 99


                       INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT
                       -----------------------------------



The Board of Directors
The Tranzonic Companies:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Tranzonic
Companies and subsidiaries as of August 31, 1997, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of earnings for the six- and three-month periods ended
August 31, 1997 and 1996, and cash flows for the six-month periods ended August
31, 1997 and 1996. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical review procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of The Tranzonic Companies and
subsidiaries as of February 28, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); and in our report dated March 31, 1997, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of February 28, 1997, is fairly presented, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


September 25, 1997
HEALTHYLIVINGTIPS

 Staying Healthy During the Winter

As we age our body’s ability to maintain a constant temperature 

is diminished, and certain diseases and conditions may make 

controlling the body’s temperature even more difficult.

As you spend time enjoying winter activities such as skating, skiing and 

building snowmen with your grandchildren, stay on the lookout for signs of 

hypothermia. These signs include:

•	Shivering

•	Loss of motor control

•	Cold skin

•	Discoloration of ears, fingers, nose or toes

•	Drowsiness

•	Confusion

•	Speech difficulties

Although winter can be dangerous, it’s important to remain active. Take steps 

now to prepare for the winter months and enjoy them safely. There are many 

ways to be safe this winter:

•	Avoid going out during storms or when the temperature is very low.

•	Keep your home warm, even when you are out. Coming home to a warm home

is an easy way to prevent frostbite and hypothermia.

•	If you think you or a loved one is suffering from hypothermia, call 911

immediately.

Useful Resources

Administration on Aging Health Related Resources

http://www.aoa.gov/AoARoot/Preparedness/Resources_Individuals/Health_

Resources.aspx

National Institute on Aging: Stay safe in cold weather!

http://www.nia.nih.gov/HealthInformation/Publications/staysafe/

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT AOA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

ADMINISTRATION ON AGING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201

PHONE: (202) 619-0724 | FAX: (202) 357-3555 | EMAIL: AOAINFO@AOA.GOV | WEB: WWW.AOA.GOV |

FACEBOOK: WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/AOA.GOV
§ 99.215 Relation to other audit requirements. ( a ) *Audit under this part in lieu of other audits.* An audit made in accordance with this part shall be in lieu of any financial audit required under individual Federal awards. To the extent this audit meets a Federal agency's needs, it shall rely upon and use such audits. The provisions of this part neither limit the authority of Federal agencies, including their Inspectors General, or GAO to conduct or arrange for additional audits (e.g., financial audits, performance audits, evaluations, inspections, or reviews) nor authorize any auditee to constrain Federal agencies from carrying out additional audits. Any additional audits shall be planned and performed in such a way as to build upon work performed by other auditors.
( b ) *Federal agency to pay for additional audits.* A Federal agency that conducts or contracts for additional audits shall, consistent with other applicable laws and regulations, arrange for funding the full cost of such additional audits.
( c ) *Request for a program to be audited as a major program.* A Federal agency may request an auditee to have a particular Federal program audited as a major program in lieu of the Federal agency conducting or arranging for the additional audits. To allow for planning, such requests should be made at least 180 days prior to the end of the fiscal year to be audited. The auditee, after consultation with its auditor, should promptly respond to such request by informing the Federal agency whether the program would otherwise be audited as a major program using the risk-based audit approach described in § 99.520 and, if not, the estimated incremental cost. The Federal agency shall then promptly confirm to the auditee whether it wants the program audited as a major program. If the program is to be audited as a major program based upon this Federal agency request, and the Federal agency agrees to pay the full incremental costs, then the auditee shall have the program audited as a major program. A pass-through entity may use the provisions of this paragraph for a subrecipient.
1 

# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1267V Filed: July 12, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

RYAN BRONSON,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Tonya Anne Oliver, Bichler, Oliver, Longo & Fox PLLC, Tampa, FL, for petitioner. Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Ju stice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On August 22, 2018, Ryan Bronson (“petit ioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Com pensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et

seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an in fluenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 15, 2015. Petition at ¶¶1-21. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 10, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to com pensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states “t hat petitioner has satisfied t he criteria set forth in the

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the Un ited States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and mo ve to redact medical or other information, the

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this def inition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contai ns a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the Unit ed States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.2 recently revised Vaccine Injury Table (‘Ta ble’) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (‘QAI’), which a fford petitioner a presumption of causation if: the diagnosis of GBS is sound; the onset of GBS occurs between thr ee and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination; and, there is no ident ified more likely alternative diagnosis.”

Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner suffered the residual effects of his
GBS for more than six mont hs and therefore, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s positio n and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
[670 NE2d 1340, 647 NYS2d 709]

#### In the Matter of William L. Beyette, Respondent, v City of Watertown et al., Appellants.

Decided July 9, 1996

*954APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Slye & Burrows,*Watertown *(Christina E. Stone*and *Robert J. Slye*of counsel), for appellants.

*Conboy, McKay, Bachman & Kendall,*Watertown *(David B. Geurtsen*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed *(see, Matter of Cook v City of Utica,*88 NY2d 833).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.