alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 137.70 Specialized knowledge or experience on the part of persons specified in § 137.1(a). ( a ) For the purpose of identifying conditions indicative of the presence or likely presence of oil at the facility and the real property on which the facility is located, persons specified in § 137.1(a) must take into account their own specialized knowledge of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located, the area surrounding the facility and the real property on which the facility is located, and the conditions of adjoining properties and their experience relevant to the inquiry.
( b ) The results of all appropriate inquiries under § 137.33 must take into account the relevant and applicable specialized knowledge and experience of the persons specified in § 137.1(a) responsible for undertaking the inquiry.
7/8/2014 ARS Project: SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS AND WATER RESOURCES IN THE UPPER WASHITA RIVER WATER...

USDA United State
ee | Agricultural Research Service

Department Of Agriculture

Southern Plains —_Grazinglands Rsch. Lab, El Reno, OK Great Plains Agroclimate and Natural Resources Research Unit

arch

Enter Keywords

Advanced Search

Browse By Subject

> Home
> About Us

Programs and Projects
> Products & Services

> People & Places
> News & Events
> Partnering

> Careers

Sd

ARS Home } About ARS ; Help | Contact Us; En Espafiol
1&2) Printable Version = E-mail this page

You are here: Research /

esearch

Research Project: SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF

AGRICULTURAL LANDS AND WATER RESOURCES IN THE Project Team
UPPER WASHITA RIVER WATERSHED © Steiner, Jean

Larry Wright - Re&d
Location: Great Plains Agroclimate and Natural “ Coordinator, NRCS

Resources Research Unit

Project Annual Reports
2006 Annual Report » FY 2007

o FY 2006
4d.Progress report. FY 2005
This report serves to document research conducted under a specific "
cooperative agreement between ARS and the Great Plains Resource
Conservation and Development. Additional details of research can be js
found in the report for the parent CRIS 6218-11130-003-00D, Related National Programs
Integration of Climate Variability and Forecasts into Risk-Based _ Water Availability and
Management Tools for Agricultural Production and Resources © Water Management (211)

Conservation, Global Change (204)

Land surveys have shown that voluntary adoption of conservation
practices is limited among land managers. This project develops more
responsive management approaches for agricultural lands and water
resources that account for climate variability and risks. Also
investigated are the quantitative impacts and value of conservation
practices and programs at a watershed scale and dialog about water
quality and water resources among diverse stakeholders. The work is
being conducted as a case study within the Upper Washita River basin
in Southwest Oklahoma. The Great Plains Resource Conservation and
Development Association has supported a network of producers to
encourage farmer adoption of no-tillage and other conservation
practices and has communicated progress in numerous newsletters.
They co-organized a no-tillage workshop for wheat-grazing systems
that was attended by 152 people and another that focused on no-till
cotton that attracted 277 participants. They have reviewed and
provided feedback on plans for soil quality research and will help
identify collaborator for on-farm research.

Last Modifie

: 10/11/2008

ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House

https:/web.archive.or g/wweb/20081014051040/http:/Amww.ars.usda.goviresearchiprojects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=407939&showpars=tr ue8fy=2006

4
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)


     CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Form S-8
     Registration Statement (No. 33-59007) pertaining to The Mead Corporation
     Employees Stock Purchase Plan, (ii) the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to
     Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 2-90746) pertaining to the 1984 Stock
     Option Plan, (iii) the Form S-8 Registration Statements (Nos. 33-37961 and
     33-47580) pertaining to the Mead Salaried Savings Plan, (iv) the Form S-3
     Registration Statements (Nos. 33-14759 and 33-34009) pertaining to Common
     Shares of Selling Shareholders, (v) the Form S-3 Registration Statements
     (Nos. 33-43994 and 33-51337) pertaining to $300,000,000 aggregate principal
     amount of Debt Securities, (vi) the Form S-8 Registration Statement (No.
     33-40118) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan, and (vii) the Form S-8
     Registration Statement (No. 33-53421) pertaining to the Mead Savings Plan
     for Bargaining Unit Employees, and Prospectus pertaining to Common Shares
     of Selling Shareholders, included in such Registration Statement, of our
     report dated January 25, 1996, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
     of The Mead Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995.

     DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


     /S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
     -------------------------
     Dayton, Ohio
     March 12, 1996

                                      75
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II

Edward B. Cloues, II
    
    
    
    RONALD R. REMICK

Ronald R. RemickChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

   and TreasurerDate: November 7, 2007
    
    
    
    Date: November 7, 2007
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Vertical Computer System, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the United
      States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:April
                21, 2008
            
            By:*/s/**David
                Braun*Name:David
                BraunTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      by
      Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Computer
      Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.325 St. Johns River. ( a ) The drawspan for the Main Street (1/SR 90) drawbridge, mile 24.7, at Jacksonville, must open on signal except that, from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday except Federal holidays, the drawspan need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
( b ) The draw of the Florida East Coast automated railroad bridge, mile 24.9, shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) The bridge shall be constantly tended and have a mechanical override capability for the automated operation. A radiotelephone shall be maintained at the bridge for the safety of navigation.
( 2 ) The draw is normally in the fully open position, displaying flashing green lights to indicate that vessels may pass.
( 3 ) When a train approaches, large signs on both the upstream and downstream sides of the bridge flash “Bridge Coming Down,” the lights go to flashing red, and siren signals sound. After an eight minute delay, the draw lowers and locks if there are no vessels under the draw. The draw remains down for a period of eight minutes or while the approach track circuit is occupied.
( 4 ) After the train has cleared, the draw opens and the lights return to flashing green.
( c ) The draw for the Buffalo Bluff CSX automated Railroad Bridge, St. Johns River, mile 94.5 at Satsuma, Putnam County, FL shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) The bridge is not tendered locally, but will be operated and monitored by a remote tender.
( 2 ) The bridge shall have local and mechanical override capabilities over the remote operation.
( 3 ) Marine radio communication shall be maintained with mariners near the bridge for the safety of navigation. Visual monitoring of the waterway shall be maintained with the use of cameras and the detection of vessels under the span shall be accomplished with detection sensors.
( 4 ) The span is normally in the fully open position and will display green lights to indicate that the span is fully open.
( 5 ) When a train approaches, the remote tender shall monitor for vessels approaching the bridge. The remote tender shall warn approaching vessels via marine radio, channel 9 VHF of a bridge lowering. The remote tender may also be contacted via telephone at (386) 649-8538.
( 6 ) Provided the sensors do not detect a vessel under the span, the tender shall initiate the span lowering sequence, which includes the sounding of a horn and the displaying of red lights. The span will remain in the down position for a minimum of eight minutes or for the entire time the approach track circuit is occupied.
( 7 ) After the train has cleared the bridge track circuit, the span shall open and the green lights will be displayed.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD7-90-76, 55 FR 47753, Nov. 15, 1990; CGD07-96-069, 62 FR 15843, Apr. 3, 1997; CGD07-05-009, 70 FR 18991, Apr. 12, 2005; USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70310, Dec. 4, 2006; USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37314, June 21, 2012; USCG-2017-0857, 84 FR 29065, June 21, 2019]
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II
    
    
    
    ROBERT E. WISNIEWSKIEdward B. Cloues, II
    
    
    
    Robert E. WisniewskiChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate: November 10, 2009
    
    
    
    Date: November 10, 2009
#### Burch *v.*Commonwealth.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Dec. 22, 1894.)*

[20 S. E. Rep. 778.]

Criminal Prosecution — Degree of Proof.

A conviction of felonjr should be set aside when the "evidence makes a case only of suspicion or probability of guilt.

Error to Louisa county court.

Edward Burch was convicted of a felony, and brings error.

[Reversed.

*Pettit & Leake, B. A. Henson,*and *W. E. Bibb,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. Taylor Scott, Atty. Gen.,*for the Commonwealth.

Fauntleroy, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the county court of Louisa county, rendered at the July term, 1893, of the said court, by which the plaintiff in error, Edward Burch, was tried and convicted of a felony, and was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for the term of three years. The only bill of exceptions is to the refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdict, and grant the prisoner a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. The evidence is certified, and not the facts, and *862
      *therefore the*review of *the*evidence by this court is restricted to the evidence of the commonwealth. A careful consideration of the evidence which was adduced on the trial by and for the commonwealth (excluding the evidence which was offered by the prisoner) shows that it is not sufficient to warrant the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court. At most, it makes a case of suspicion or probability of guilt against the prisoner, but it falls far short of that satisfactory measure of proof of guilt which the law requires, to exclude the reasonable presumption of the innocence of the accused, which can only be overcome by clear and sufficient testimony. In this record there is no direct proof to establish the guilt of the prisoner. It is not only altogether circumstantial, but it is vague and violently conjectural, withal. This disposes of the case, and renders it unnecessary to discuss other points presented and pressed in argument.

We are of opinion that the evidence adduced by the commonwealth upon the trial is wholly insufficient to warrant the verdict, and that the county court of Louisa county erred in refusing to set aside the verdict, and to grant the prisoner a new trial. The verdict of the jury is set aside, the judgment rendered thereon is reversed and annulled, and the case will be remanded to the county court of Louisa county for a new trial. Reversed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                               
                                
  
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-32841 and No. 
33-13130) pertaining to the MLX Corp. Stock Option Plan and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 7, 1996,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MLX
Corp. included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1995.
  
  
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
  
  March 27,  1996
  Atlanta, Georgia
FAA Home
Regulations & Policies
Advisory Circulars (ACs)

# AC 150/5370-10C - Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5370-10C
- Title
- Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
- Date cancelled
- 2008-09-30
- Cancelled by
- 150/5370-10D
- Date issued
- 2007-09-29
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Engineering Division 
- Description
-  Provides standards for the construction of airports. Items covered include general provisions, earthwork, flexible base courses, rigid base courses, flexible surface courses, rigid pavement, fencing, drainage, turfing, and lighting installation. **See Errata Sheet below.**Because of the size of this document, it is available as a single file (see Complete) or as three smaller files (see Parts 1-3). **See Construction Standards for Airports to access individual files for each item or part.** 
- Content
-  This document's content is unavailable. 

## View All

      - Current ACs
      - Cancelled ACs
      - Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs

## Export All

      - Current ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled ACs  (CSV)

## Contact Information

      - Advisory Circulars Administrator
      - Other Points of Contact  (MS Excel)
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.145 What are the requirements for curbs, gutters, drains, and reservoirs?

Each pumping platform complex must have enough curbs, gutters, drains, and reservoirs to collect, in the reservoirs, all oil and contaminants not authorized for discharge into the ocean according to the deepwater port's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.555 College Creek.

The draws of the Naval Academy highway bridge, mile 0.3 at Annapolis, and the Maryland highway bridge, mile 0.4 at Annapolis, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
ACL/AoD Developmental Disabilities Councils (SCDD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2023 Final Allocation

8/29/2023

State/Territory

Developmental 

Disabilities 

Councils (SCDD)

Alabama $1,287,864

Alaska $527,570

Arizona $1,501,328

Arkansas $777,807

California $8,064,166

Colorado $1,181,856

Connecticut $741,399

Delaware $527,570

District of Columbia $527,570

Florida $4,451,007

Georgia $2,251,840

Hawaii $527,570

Idaho $527,570

Illinois $2,715,037

Indiana $1,488,546

Iowa $774,176

Kansas $614,590

Kentucky $1,195,270

Louisiana $1,380,778

Maine $527,570

Maryland $1,265,982

Massachusetts $1,434,478

Michigan $2,531,242

Minnesota $1,155,984

Mississippi $923,684

Missouri $1,361,246

Montana $527,570

Nebraska $527,570

Nevada $660,780

New Hampshire $527,570

New Jersey $1,870,166

New Mexico $546,291

New York $4,177,121

North Carolina $2,168,620

North Dakota $527,570

Ohio $2,846,720

Oklahoma $915,094

Oregon $863,154

Pennsylvania $3,026,520

Rhode Island $527,570

South Carolina $1,145,926

South Dakota $527,570

Tennessee $1,470,950

Texas $6,178,446

Utah $671,978

Vermont $527,570

Virginia $1,751,030

Washington $1,577,033

West Virginia $739,342

Wisconsin $1,305,492

Wyoming $527,570

American Samoa $274,744

Guam $274,744

Northern Mariana Islands $274,744

Puerto Rico $2,506,930

Virgin Islands $274,744

TOTAL $80,004,829
Opinion issued August 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00389-CV

———————————

DAVID PIPER, Appellant

V.

TEXASONE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2010-32201

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, David Piper, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order 

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of 
2

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). 

Further, Piper has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5; 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
Program Name

Program Information Cover Sheet

Instructions to Program Facilitator(s): Please provide the requested details

about this program. Please print clearly. Use this as a cover sheet for the

completed data collection forms to return to the Survey Coordinator.

1. Site Name: 

Address: 

City: State: Zip: 

2. Program Facilitator Names (please provide full first and last names and provide the 

daytime phone number and/or email of the best person to contact about any questions 

on the forms)

First Name

First Name

Last Name

Last Name

Ph: (___) _____ - ____________

Email:

Would you like to receive program information from the

National CDSME Resource Center? Yes No

Ph: (___) _____ - ____________

Email:

Would you like to receive program information from 

National CDSME Resource Center? Yes No
3. Program Start Date (mm/dd/yyyy): / / 

 End Date (mm/dd/yyyy): / / __

4. Did you offer a “Session 0” with this program? (Session 0 is an optional pre-program

session. Not all programs offer a Session 0.)

o Yes

o No

o Don’t know

5. What type of program is this? Mark only one. [Note to grantee: adapt this section to fit 

 local programming]

o Active Living Every Day

o Arthritis Foundation Aquatic Program

o Arthritis Foundation Exercise Program

o BRI Care Consultation

o Cancer: Thriving and Surviving

o Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP)

o Chronic Pain Self-Management Program (CPSMP)

o Diabetes Self-Management Program (DSMP)

o Eat Smart, Move More, Weigh Less

o EnhanceFitness

o EnhanceWellness

o Fit and Strong!

o Geri-Fit

o Health Coaches for Hypertension Control

o Healthy IDEAS

o Healthy Moves for Aging Well

o HomeMeds

o Living Well in the Community

o On the Move

o PEARLS

o Positive Self-Management Program for HIV

o Programa de Manejo Personal de la Diabetes (Spanish DSMP)

o Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)

o Tomando Control de su Salud (Spanish CDSMP)

o Walk With Ease

o Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP)

o Workplace Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (wCDSMP)

6. Please check which language you used when offering this program:
o English

o Spanish

o Other: ________________________________________

7. What funding source(s) were used in direct support of this program? Check all that 

apply.

o ACL CDSME Grant

o Older Americans Act (Title III-D, Title III-E, etc.)

o Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

o Other Federal Funding

o Medicaid/Medicaid Waiver

o Medicare/Medicare Advantage

o Other Health Care Payer

o Foundation Funding

o Corporate Sponsor

o Don’t Know

o Other: ________________________________________
#### § 783.15 “State”.

As used in the Act, “State” means “any State of the United States or the District of Columbia or any Territory or possession of the United States” (Act, section 3(c)). The application of this definition in determining questions of coverage under the Acts' definition of “commerce” and “produced” (see §§ 783.12, 783.13) is discussed in part 776 of this chapter, dealing with general coverage.