alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Determination of Insufficient Assets To Satisfy Claims Against 
Financial Institution in Receivership

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FDIC has determined that insufficient assets exist in the 
receivership of Eurobank, San Juan, Puerto Rico, to make any 
distribution on general unsecured claims, and therefore such claims 
will recover nothing and have no value.

DATES: The FDIC made its determination on August 2, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions regarding this 
notice, you may contact an FDIC Claims Agent at (904) 256-3925. Written 
correspondence may also be mailed to FDIC as Receiver of Eurobank, 
Attention: Claims Agent, 7777 Baymeadows Way West, Jacksonville, 
Florida 32256.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 30, 2010, Eurobank, San Juan, 
Puerto Rico, (FIN <greek-i>10229) was closed by the Office of the 
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto 
Rico (``OCFI''), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
(``FDIC'') was appointed as its receiver (``Receiver''). In complying 
with its statutory duty to resolve the institution in the method that 
is least costly to the deposit insurance fund, see 12 U.S.C. 
1823(c)(4), the FDIC facilitated a transaction with Oriental Bank and 
Trust, San Juan, Puerto Rico, to acquire the deposits and most of the 
assets of the failed institution.
    Section 11(d)(11)(A) of the FDI Act, 12 U.S.C. 1821(d)(11)(A), sets 
forth the order of priority for distribution of amounts realized from 
the liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository 
institution to pay claims. Under the statutory order of priority, 
administrative expenses and deposit liabilities must be paid in full 
before any distribution may be made to general unsecured creditors or 
any lower priority claims.
    As of May 31, 2011, the value of assets available for distribution 
by the Receiver, together with anticipated recoveries on claims against 
directors, officers, and other professionals was $742,676,348. As of 
the same date, administrative expenses and depositor liabilities 
equaled $1,466,183,675, exceeding available assets and potential 
recoveries by $723,507,327. Accordingly, the FDIC has determined that 
insufficient assets exist to make any distribution on general unsecured 
creditor claims (and any lower priority claims) and therefore all such 
claims, asserted or unasserted, will recover nothing and have no value.

    Dated: August 11, 2011.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20766 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CA-330-1030-JE-014B]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given related to the restriction of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administered lands in accordance with regulations contained in 43 CFR 8364.1(a). This action affects approximately 7,400 acres of public land comprising the Headwaters Forest Reserve, located in Humboldt County, CA. Public access into the Reserve from the south along Felt Springs Road is allowed only during BLM  guided hikes. The public must contact the BLM Arcata Field Office to make reservations. Employees, agents and permittees of the BLM may be exempt from this restriction as determined by the authorized officer.

# DATES:

This restriction order will be effective upon the date of publication and will terminate upon the completion and approval of a long range management plan for the area.

# ADDRESSES:

Maps and supporting documentation are available for review at the following location: Bureau of Land Management, Arcata Field Office, 1695 Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lynda J. Roush, BLM, Arcata Field Manager (707)   825-2300.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Limiting public access into the Reserve from the south end is consistent with Environmental Assessment No. 99-15, “Headwaters Forest Reserve: Public Access (South)” and its Decision Record entitled “Public Access to the Southern Part of the Headwaters Forest Reserve.” The decision provides for interim public access with BLM personnel accompanying visitors as they hike along Salmon Creek Trail. Guided hikes are needed to protect the fragile natural resources within the old-growth redwood groves of the Reserve. Limited public access from the south will be allowed from May 15th through November 15th with wet weather restrictions. There will be four guided hikes per week/one hike per day. Each hike is limited to 20-30 visitors. Two days per week are reserved for schools/educational programs.

Lynda J. Roush,

Arcata Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 00-13803 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 9

- 4 1 2 7 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A

,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

R E Y D A V I D H E R E V I A

, a l s o k n o w n a s R a y D a v i d B a r r i o s H e r e b i a ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 1 : 0 9

- C R

- 8 4 5

- 1

B e f o r e W I E N E R

, B A R K S D A L E

, a n d B E N A V I D E S

, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

R e y D a v i d H e r e v i a c h a l l e n g e s h i s w i t h i n

- g u i d e l i n e s s e n t e n c e o f 5 7 m o n t h s ’

i m p r i s o n m e n t
, i m p o s e d f o l l o w i n g h i s g u i l t y

- p l e a c o n v i c t i o n f o r i l l e g a l l y

r e e n t e r i n g t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a f t e r h a v i n g b e e n r e m o v e d f o l l o w i n g a c o n v i c t i o n

f o r a n a g g r a v a t e d f e l o n y , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 3 2 6

. H e r e v i a c l a i m s h i s

s e n t e n c e w a s u n r e a s o n a b l e b o t h b e c a u s e o f t h e a g e o f t h e o f f e n s e u s e d t o

e n h a n c e h i s s e n t e n c e a n d b e c a u s e o f h i s a s s i m i l a t i o n i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

. A s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 6, 2 010

Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5
, the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-41273 Document: 00511196705 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2010N o

. 0 9

- 4 1 2 7 3

a p a r t o f h i s w r i t t e n p l e a a g r e e m e n t
, h o w e v e r , H e r e v i a w a i v e d h i s r i g h t t o

a p p e a l h i s s e n t e n c e o r t h e m a n n e r i n w h i c h i t w a s d e t e r m i n e d o n a n y g r o u n d

. O n a p p e a l

, H e r e v i a d o e s n o t c h a l l e n g e t h e v a l i d i t y o f t h e a p p e a l w a i v e r , b u t i n s t e a d c o n t e n d s t h a t t h e G o v e r n m e n t h a s n o t a d e q u a t e l y s o u g h t t o e n f o r c e

i t

. W e d i s a g r e e

. T h e G o v e r n m e n t h a s a s s e r t e d i n i t s b r i e f t h a t i t s e e k s

e n f o r c e m e n t o f t h e w a i v e r , a n d t h a t i t b a r s t h i s a p p e a l

. S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. S t o r y , 4 3 9 F

. 3 d 2 2 6
, 2 3 1 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 6 )

. A l t h o u g h a v a l i d a p p e a l w a i v e r d o e s

n o t i m p l i c a t e o u r j u r i s d i c t i o n , s e e i d

. a t 2 3 0
, H e r e v i a ’ s a p p e a l o f h i s s e n t e n c e i s

c l e a r l y b a r r e d b y t h e w a i v e r

. D I S M I S S E D

.

2 Case: 09-41273 Document: 00511196705 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2010
**Exhibit
        32.2**
  
 Section
        906 Certification
 
 The
        following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form
        10-Q of
        the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The
        undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
        (15
        U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        the MLM Index TM Fund.
 
 
 November
        5, 2007
 
 /s/
                  James A. MehlingVice
                  President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
                  OfficerMount
                  Lucas Management Corporation,the
                  manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 410 

Designating February 17, 2008, as ‘‘Race Day in America’’ and highlighting 

the 50th running of the Daytona 500. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19 (legislative day, DECEMBER 18), 2007 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. MARTINEZ, and Mr. SANDERS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating February 17, 2008, as ‘‘Race Day in America’’ 

and highlighting the 50th running of the Daytona 500. 

Whereas the Daytona 500 is the most prestigious stock car 

race in the United States; 

Whereas the Daytona 500 annually kicks off the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR) Sprint 

Cup Series, NASCAR’s top racing series; 

Whereas millions of racing fans have spent the 3rd Sunday 

of each February since 1959 watching, listening to, or attending the Daytona 500; 

Whereas the purse for the Daytona 500 is typically the largest in motor sports; 

Whereas winning the prestigious Harley J. Earl Trophy is 

stock car racing’s greatest prize and privilege; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 410 ATS 

Whereas nearly 1,000,000 men and women in the Armed 

Forces in nearly 180 countries worldwide listen to the 

race on the radio via the American Forces Network; 

Whereas Daytona International Speedway is the home of 

‘‘The Great American Race’’—the Daytona 500; 

Whereas fans from all 50 States and many foreign nations 

converge on the ‘‘World Center of Racing’’ each year to 

see the motor sports spectacle; 

Whereas Daytona International Speedway becomes one of the 

largest cities in the State of Florida by population on 

race day, with more than 200,000 fans in attendance; 

Whereas well-known politicians, celebrities, and athletes take 

part in the festivities surrounding the Daytona 500; and 

Whereas, on February 17th, 2008, the Daytona 500 celebrates its historic 50th running: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the 50th running of the Daytona 

3 500, ‘‘The Great American Race’’, on February 17, 

4 2008; and 

5 (2) designates February 17, 2008, as ‘‘Race 

6 Day in America’’ in honor of the Daytona 500. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of StereoVision Vision
Entertainment, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John Honour, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/S/     John Honour
John Honour
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executivel Officer)


September 27, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 125.51 Replacement of lost Coast Guard Port Security Card. ( a ) Any person whose Coast Guard Port Security Card has been stolen, lost, or destroyed shall report that fact to a Coast Guard Port Security Unit or Captain of the Port as soon thereafter as possible.
( b ) A person who has lost a Coast Guard Port Security Card may apply for a replacement card by submitting “An Application for Replacement of Lost Port Security Card” (Form CG 2685A) to a Coast Guard Port Security Unit. A replacement will be issued only after a full explanation of the loss of the Coast Guard Port Security Card is made in writing to the Coast Guard and after a full check is made and authorization is granted by the Commandant.
( c ) Any person to whom a Coast Guard Port Security Card has been issued as a replacement for a lost card, shall immediately surrender the original card to the nearest Coast Guard Port Security Unit or Captain of the Port if the original card should be recovered.
#### § 788.4 Significance of official interpretations.

The interpretations contained in this part indicate, with respect to section 13(a)(13) of the Act which refers to small forestry or lumbering operations, the construction of the law which the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator believes to be correct and which will guide them in the performance of their duties under the Act unless and until they are otherwise directed by authoratative decisions of the courts or conclude, upon reexamination of an interpretation, that it is incorrect.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-75 Action on appeals. ( a ) Upon receipt, the Hearing Officer provides a copy of the appeal and any supporting brief to the District Commander who referred the case. Any comments which the District Commander desires to submit must be received by the Hearing Officer within 30 days. The Hearing Officer includes the District Commander's comments, or not later than 30 days after receipt of the appeal if no comments are submitted by the District Commander, the Hearing Officer forwards all materials in the case to the Commandant.
( b ) The Commandant issues a written decision in each case and furnishes copies to the party, the District Commander, and the Hearing Officer, The Commandant may affirm, reverse, or modify the decision, or remand the case for new or additional proceedings. In the absence of a remand, the decision of the Commandant on appeal shall be final. In addition to the actions which may be taken by the Commandant on appeal, the Commandant may also remit, mitigate or suspend the assessment in whole or in part. Upon the taking of remission, mitigation, or suspension action, the Commandant will inform the party of the action and any conditions placed on the action.
[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by CGD 87-008a, 52 FR 17555, May 11, 1987]
No. 01

– 15

– 00010

– CV IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS AT HOUSTON

________________________ Mark THOMPSON, SR., Appellant,

v. Karen SMITH, Appellee.

________________________ On Appeal from the 246th District Court of Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

– 03434

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE FIRST COURT OF
APPEALS:
NOW COMES Appellee, Karen Smith (“Smith”) , and files this Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief pursuant to Rules 10.5(b) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Smith respectfully requests that this Court grant her additional time to file her brief, and would show in suppo rt of her request the following: ACCEPTED 01-15-00010-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/8/2015 2:20:12 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKARGUMENT AND AUTHORITY

1. There is no specific deadline to file this motion to extend. See Tex.
R. App. P . 38.6 (d).

2. The Court has the authority under Tex. R. App. P

. 38.6(d) to
extend the time to file a brief.

3. Smith’s brie f is currently due on J une 8, 2015.
4. Smith requests an additional 30 days to file her brie f, extending the time until July 8, 2015.
5. One extens ion has been granted to extend the time to file App e llee ’ s b rief.
6. Smith needs additional time to file her brief because counsel for Smith
had several matters to prepare for and try betwe en the time Appellant brief was filed and Smith’s current deadline. Time was also lost to the flooding in the Houston area over Memorial Day. This, in conjunction with the routine matters that counsel for Smith attends to on a daily basis , has prevented counsel for Smith from being able to fully prepare Appellee’s brief by the June 8, 2015 deadline

. 7. This extension is not sought for delay but so that justice may be done. Smith seeks this extension so that she may prepare a thorough and well

- developed
brief to aid this Cour t in its analy sis of the issue.PRAYER For these reasons, Smith prays that this Court grant her request for an
extension of t ime to file her brief until July 8, 2015. Respectfully Submitted, BUTEL & PICKETT, PLLC

________________________ G. Troy Pickett Texas Bar No. 24072757 William A. Scheel Texas Bar No. 24075025 2222 Bissonnet, Ste. 203 Houston, Texas 77005 Tel.: 713

– 589

– 7140 Fax: 713

– 589

– 7141 email: gtpservice@butelpickett.com ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEECERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true copy of the foregoing was served in accordance with rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party or that party's lead counsel via e

- service on June 8 , 2015 : Party: Mark Thompson, Sr. Lead attorney: Nida C. Wood Address of service: 1330 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 1800 Houston, Texas 770 56

___________________ __ G. Troy Pickett Attorney for Appell ee
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement



 Exhibit 4.13 
 BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE ENERGY L.P. 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND
RESTATED 
 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated
Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of November 20, 2011 (the “Agreement”) of Brookfield Renewable Energy L.P. (the “Partnership”) is made as of the
4th day of May 2012, by the undersigned. Capitalized terms
used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 17.1 of the Agreement, subject to compliance with the requirements of the Limited Partnership Act and the Exempted Partnerships Act, the General Partner (pursuant to its power of attorney from the Limited Partners), without the approval
of any Limited Partner, may amend any provision of the Agreement to reflect certain changes, as provided for in Section 17.1.13, including a change that, as determined by the General Partner in its sole discretion, does not adversely affect the
Limited Partners as a whole (including any particular class of Partnership Interests as compared to other classes of Partnership Interests) in any material respect; 

AND WHEREAS, the board of directors of the General Partner, on
behalf of the Partnership, resolved on May 4th , 2012
to permit the deletion of requirements in the Agreement relating to the publication and audit of financial statements of the Partnership; 
 AND WHEREAS, the General Partner desires to amend the Agreement as set out herein; 

NOW THEREFORE, 

 

	1.	Amendment 


Section 11.4 of the Agreement and all subsections therein are hereby amended by being deleted in their entirety.

  

	2.	This amendment shall be effective upon the date first written above. 

  

	3.	Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
General Partner has executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE
 ENERGY L.P., by its general partner
 BREP Holding L.P., by its general

partner BRP Bermuda GP Limited

		
	By:	 	    “Gregory E. A. Morrison”
		 	Name: Gregory E. A. Morrison
		 	Title:   President