alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 95.27 Allowable costs.

For each kind of recipient, there is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. Allowability of costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles applicable to the entity incurring the costs. Thus, allowability of costs incurred by State, local or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-87 (codified at 2 CFR part 225), “Cost Principles for State and Local Governments.” The allowability of costs incurred by non-profit organizations is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-122 (codified at 2 CFR part 230), “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations.” The allowability of costs incurred by institutions of higher education is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-21 (codified at 2 CFR part 220), “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” The allowability of costs incurred by hospitals is determined in accordance with the provisions of Appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, “Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals.” The allowability of costs incurred by commercial organizations and those non-profit organizations listed in Attachment C to Circular A-122 is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 31.

[59 FR 38271, July 27, 1994, as amended at 72 FR 37104, July 9, 2007]
§ 125.33 Holders of Coast Guard Port Security Cards. ( a ) Whenever the Commandant is not satisfied that the character and habits of life of a holder of a Coast Guard Port Security Card are such as to warrant the belief that his presence on waterfront facilities and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein, would not be inimical to the security of the United States, he will request the holder to furnish, under oath in writing, such information as he deems pertinent and necessary for a determination on this issue.
( b ) If the holder fails or refuses to furnish such information within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Commandant's request, the Commandant may issue the written notice provided for in § 125.35(a).
( c ) The holder's failure or refusal to furnish such information shall preclude a determination that the holder's character and habits of life are such as to warrant the belief that his presence on waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein, would not be inimical to the security of the United States.
( d ) Upon receipt of such information as the Commandant may have required, the procedure prescribed in § 125.29(b) shall be followed.
( e ) If the Commandant is satisfied that the character and habits of life of the holder are such as to warrant the belief that his presence on waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein, would not be inimical to the security of the United States, he shall notify the holder accordingly.
( f ) If the Commandant is not satisfied that the character and habits of life of the holder are such as to warrant the belief that his presence on waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein, would not be inimical to the security of the United States, he shall notify the holder in writing as provided for in § 125.35.
[CGFR 59-63, 25 FR 1589, Feb. 24, 1960]
Form of Amendment No. 1 to Change of Control Severance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.64 
 NETAPP, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 

CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to that certain Change of Control Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective as of June 19, 2008, by and between NetApp,
Inc. (the “Company”) and
[            ]1 (“Executive”), is made and entered into as of May 17, 2011. All capitalized terms that are used in this Amendment but not defined in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings
ascribed thereto in the Agreement. 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Initial Term of the Agreement is set to expire on June 19, 2011; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the extension of the Initial Term to June 19, 2014. 

AGREEMENT 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein, as well as other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and accepted, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment to Section 1. Section 1 the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement will have an initial term commencing on the Effective Date and ending on
June 19, 2014 (the “Initial Term”). On June 19, 2014, this Agreement will renew automatically for an additional one (1) year term (the “Additional Term”) unless either party provides the other party with written
notice of non-renewal at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of automatic renewal. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, if a Change of Control occurs at any time during either the Initial Term or an Additional Term, the term of this
Agreement will extend automatically through date that is twelve (12) months following the effective date of the Change of Control. If Executive becomes entitled to severance benefits under Section 3 during the term of this Agreement, the
Agreement will not terminate until all of the obligations of the parties hereto with respect to this Agreement have been satisfied.” 
 2. Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly amended or modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which
together will constitute one and the same instrument. 
 [Signature page follows] 

 
  

	1 	 This Amendment No. 1 was entered into with Messrs. Gomo, Salmon and Mendoza. 









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment as of the date set forth
in the first paragraph hereof. 
  

					
	COMPANY	 	NETAPP, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	 
		 		 	
		 	Name:	 	 
		 		 	
		 	Title:	 	 


  

					
	EXECUTIVE	 	NETAPP, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	 
		 		 	
		 	Name:	 	 
		 		 	
		 	Title:
Motion to withdraw granted, motion to extend time to file brief granted, and 

Order filed January 26, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00827-CV

TEXAS REIT, LLC, DALIO HOLDINGS I, LLC, AND DALIO HOLDINGS 

II, LLC, Appellants

V.

WCW HOUSTON PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-35320

ORDER

Before the court is a motion to withdraw as counsel filed January 9, 2023. 

Appellants’ counsels Jadd Masso, Elizabeth Griffin and the Clark Hill PLC law firm 

seek to withdraw from their representation of appellants in this appeal. Having 

considered the motion, the court grants the motion.

Also before the court is a motion to extend time for appellants to file their
2

brief, which seeks an extension of time to March 6, 2023 based partly on appellants

seeking to proceed without recent counsel in this appeal. Having considered the 

motion, the court grants it and instructs appellants to file their brief no later than 

March 6, 2023.

However, because the motion to withdraw has been granted, appellants are 

not currently represented by any counsel in this appeal. Except for the performance 

of ministerial tasks, corporations and other non-natural persons may appear and be 

represented only by a licensed attorney. Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics 

Corp., U.S.A., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996); see also Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best. 

Indus. Uniform Sup. Co., 743 S.W.2d 302, 303 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 

1987, writ denied). 

If appellants do not retain counsel for the filing of their brief no later than 

March 6, 2023, the appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Bourliot.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.19 Signalling when two or more vessels are approaching a drawbridge.

When two or more vessels are approaching the same drawbridge at the same time, or nearly the same, time, whether from the same or opposite directions, each vessel shall signal independently for the opening of the draw and the drawtender shall reply in turn to the signal of each vessel. The drawtender need not reply to signals by vessels accumulated at the bridge for passage during a scheduled open period.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11
 
                             AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                MARCH 31
                                                          ---------------------
                                                             1998       1997
                                                          ---------- ----------
                                                          (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT
                                                             PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>
Net income............................................... $   62,023 $   54,573
                                                          ========== ==========
Average shares of common stock outstanding*..............    120,976    125,683
                                                          ========== ==========
Earnings per common share*............................... $     0.51 $     0.43
                                                          ========== ==========
Diluted average shares of common stock outstanding*......    122,198    126,626
                                                          ========== ==========
Diluted earnings per common share*....................... $     0.51 $     0.43
                                                          ========== ==========
</TABLE>
--------
*Restated for three-for-two common stock split in April 1998.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.525 Kennebec River. The draw of the Carlton Bridge, mile 14.0, between Bath and Woolwich shall operate as follows: ( a ) From May 15 through September 30 the draw shall open on signal; except that, from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if a two-hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( b ) From October 1 through May14 the draw shall open on signal; except that, from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m., the draw shall open on signal after a twenty-four hours notice is given from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Saturday and Sunday, after an eight-hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
[USCG-2016-0344, 81 FR 36167, June 6, 2016]
First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. 10-K





Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vincent G. Easi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Vincent G. Easi__________








Vincent G. Easi


Chief Financial Officer


March 30, 2011
##### 



Exhibit 12
 
  CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
    
    Cash dividends paid/Common shares outstanding at
date of declarationBOOK VALUE PER SHARE
    
    Total stockholders equity/Common shares outstanding
at year-endRETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Net income/Average assetsRETURN ON AVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
    
    Net income/Average stockholders equityTANGIBLE RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    (Net income)/(Average assets)TANGIBLE RETURN ON AVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
    
    (Net income)/(Average Equity)EARNINGS PER SHARE
    
    (Net income)/(Weighted-average common shares
outstanding)NET INTEREST MARGIN
    
    Net interest income/Average earning assetsNON-INTEREST EXPENSE TO AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Non-interest expense/Average assetsEFFICIENCY RATIO
    
    (Non-interest expenses less non-recurring, non-operational items)/(Net interest income plus
non-interest income)AVERAGE LOANS TO AVERAGE DEPOSITS
    
    Average gross loans/Average depositsDIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO
    
    Dividends declared/Net incomeAVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY TO AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Average stockholders equity/Average assetsPRIMARY CAPITAL TO PERIOD-END TOTAL ASSETS
    
    (Stockholders equity plus allowance for loan
losses)/(Period-end total assets plus allowance for loan losses)TIER I CAPITAL TO PERIOD
    
    (Stockholders equity less accumulated other
comprehensive income/(loss)(Tier 1
Capital)/Risk-adjusted assetsTOTAL CAPITAL RATIO
    
    Tier 1 Capital plus allowance for loan
losses/Risk-adjusted assetsTIER I LEVERAGE RATIO
    
    Tier 1 Capital/Quarterly average assetsNET CHARGE-OFFS TO AVERAGE LOANS
    
    (Gross charge-offs less recoveries)/Average net loansNON-PERFORMING LOANS AS A PERCENTAGE OF
PERIOD END
    
    (Nonaccrual loans plus loans past due 90 days or
greater plus renegotiated loans)/Gross loans net of
unearned interestNON-PERFORMING ASSETS AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL ASSETS
    
    (Nonaccrual loans plus loans past due 90 days or greater plus renegotiated loans plus other real
estate owned)/Total assetsALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES TO PERIOD-END TOTAL
LOANS
    
    Allowance for loan losses/Gross loans net of
unearned interest
§ 151.2080 Penalties. ( a ) A person who violates this subpart is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $35,000. Each day of a continuing violation constitutes a separate violation. A vessel operated in violation of the regulations is liable in rem for any civil penalty assessed under this subpart for that violation.
( b ) A person who knowingly violates the regulations of this subpart is guilty of a class C felony.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2553-000]


Kansas City Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

May 25, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Kansas City Power & Light Company 
(KCPL), tendered for filing Service Agreements dated May 1, 2000, 
between KCPL and Corel Energy. This Agreement provides for the rates 
and charges for Non-Firm and Short-term Firm Transmission Service.
    KCPL proposes an effective date of May 3, 2000 and requests a 
waiver of the Commission's notice requirement to allow the requested 
effective date.
    In its filing, KCPL states that the rates included in the above-
mentioned Service Agreement are KCPL's rates and charges in the 
compliance filing to FERC Order 888-A in Docket No. OA97-636-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14132 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-187Version 1.02001

### Preliminary Lithogeochemical Map Showing Near-Surface Rock Types in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, Virginia and Maryland

### *By* John D. Peper, Lucy B. McCartan, J. Wright Horton, Jr., *and* James E. Reddy

Prepared in cooperation with the Virginia Division of Mineral Resources and the Maryland Geological Survey

                The lithogeochemical map included in this report was compiled in Arc/Info. The complete report contains:

- color map                         text describing the geology                        database files                
                Consult the readme.txt file for a complete description of the report, including instructions for downloading and importing the files.
                View the database explanation as an unformatted, ASCII text file: readme.txt (11 Kb)
View the map in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format. of01187p1.pdf (2.3 Mb).  Go to Adobe Acrobat to download the free Acrobat Reader software if you you don't already have it.
View the text pamphlet of the report in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format: of01187.pdf (293 Kb). The PDF file is 26 pages on 8.5" x 11" paper and prints best on a 600 dpi laser printer.
UNIX Download the compressed data files in unprojected geographic coordinates with units in decimal degrees of01187_tar.gz (6.8 Mb)PC Download the compressed data files in unprojected geographic coordinates with units in decimal degrees of01187.zip (7.0 Mb)
The paper map was designed and tested on a Hewlett Packard DesignJet 1055 series printer. Select this option if you have access to a large format printer capable of plotting PostScript files.  These files have been successfully printed from Arc/Info, Adobe Illustrator, and from the MS-DOS prompt using the "print" command.UNIX Download the compressed file for printing the paper lithogeochemical map (Plate 1 of 1, 32" tall x 48" wide) in PostScript format. of01187p1_ps.gz (3.5 Mb compressed and 26.6 Mb uncompressed).PC Download the compressed file for printing the paper lithogeochemical map (Plate 1 of 1, 32" tall x 48" wide) in PostScript format. of01187p1.zip (3.5 Mb compressed and 26.6 Mb uncompressed).
View the metadata files for this report.
This compact disc can be obtained by writing:
USGS Information Services
The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge 1

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-4233

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Juan Beavers, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 23, 1996

 Filed: August 28, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Juan Beavers appeals the 151-month sentence imposed by the District

Court after he pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine base (crack) with

1

intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). We

affirm.

At sentencing, Beavers, an African-American, objected to his offenselevel calculation, which was derived from the penalty scheme set forth in

21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), providing the same penalties for given amounts of

crack and 100 times greater amounts of powder cocaine (the 100-to-1 ratio).

Beavers's objection was premised on Congress's rejection of a proposed

amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines (Amendment 5) which would have

eliminated the 100-to-1 ratio and equalized the penalties for crack and

powder cocaine. Beavers argued the 100-to-1 ratio had a disproportionate
-2-

adverse effect on African-Americans, Congress's rejection of Amendment 5

evidenced a discriminatory purpose on Congress's part in maintaining the

penalty scheme, and thus, continued application of the penalty scheme

violated his Fifth Amendment equal protection and due process rights. The

District Court overruled Beavers's objection, and he appeals. We rejected

the challenge Beavers raises here in United States v. Carter, No. 96-1329,

1996 WL 453275, at *2-*3 (8th Cir. Aug. 13, 1996) (per curiam).

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                             CELEBRATE EXPRESS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Celebrate Express, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darin L. White, Vice
President, Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

 /s/ Darin L. White
------------------------------
Darin L. White
Vice President, Finance
August 28, 2006