alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10492

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DONTRAYE POTTER, also known as Tre,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-368-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dontraye Potter has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Potter has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed 

to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Potter’s claims of ineffective assistance 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10492 Document: 00513383468 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-10492

2

of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Potter’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Potter’s motion to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel is 

DENIED.

 Case: 15-10492 Document: 00513383468 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of BSI2000, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
      United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:September
                1, 2005
            **BSI2000,
                INC.**By:*/s/
                Jack Harper*Name:Jack
                HarperTitle:
                Principal Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to BSI2000, Inc. and will be retained by
      BSI2000, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Honor 

the 

Dream

www.peacecorps.gov/wws

"My students learned to look 

beyond themselves, to see 

that they are part of a 

global community they 

can contribute to."

Teacher, Ohio

on participating in the 

Correspondence Match program
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.232 What are the rules for a formal hearing? ( a ) The Commandant (CG-5P) determines the rules for each formal hearing. Unless otherwise specified in this part, the Commandant (CG-5P) applies the rules of practice, procedure, and evidence in part 20 of this chapter.
( b ) The Commandant (CG-5P) sends a written copy of the procedure to the applicant, each person intervening in the proceedings, and each person who requests a copy.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
Order entered January 9 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 22 - 00868 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 00869 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 00870 - CR No. 05 - 22 - 00871 - CR KENNETH SHERMAN , Appellant V. T HE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F21 - 75358 - M , F20 - 75893 - M, F20 - 75847 - M, F20 - 54139 - M O RDER The reporter’s record for these appeals is overdue. The record was origina lly due October 11, 2022 . On November 14, 2022, the court reporter requested an extension of time to file the reporter’s record to December 12, 2022, which this Court granted. The reporter’s record remains unfiled.We ORDER court reporter Belinda Barak a to file the reporter’s record for these appeals on or before FEBRUARY 8, 2023 . Ms. Baraka is cautioned that if the reporter’s record is not filed by February 8, 2023, the Court may abate the cases and order the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record has not been filed. /s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR936000-14300000-ET0000; HAG-11-0193; OROR-1202]


Public Land Order No. 7776; Extension of Public Land Order No. 
6875; Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order extends the duration of the withdrawal created by 
Public Land Order No. 6875 for an additional 20-year period. The 
extension is necessary to continue protection of the rare botanical 
specimens and the unique natural environment located within the 
Babyfoot and Big Craggies Botanical Areas, which would otherwise expire 
on August 27, 2011.

DATES:  Effective Date: August 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles R. Roy, Bureau of Land 
Management, Oregon/Washington State Office, 503-808-6189, or Dianne 
Torpin, United States Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, 503-
808-2422. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf 
(TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-
877-8339 to contact either of the above individuals during normal 
business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to 
leave a message or question with either of the above individuals. You 
will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose for which the withdrawal was 
first made for requires this extension to continue the protection of 
rare botanical specimens and the unique natural environment located 
within the Babyfoot and Big Craggies Botanical Areas. The withdrawal 
extended by this order will expire on August 27, 2031, unless as a 
result of a review conducted prior to the expiration date pursuant to 
Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714(f), the Secretary determines that the withdrawal shall 
be further extended.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714, it is ordered as follows:
    Public Land Order No. 6875 (56 FR 42539 (1991)), which withdrew 
approximately 1,050 acres of National Forest System lands from location 
and entry under the United States mining laws (30 U.S.C. chapter 2), 
but not from leasing under the mineral leasing laws, to protect the 
Babyfoot and Big Craggies Botanical Areas, is hereby extended for an 
additional 20-year period until August 27, 2031.

    Authority: 43 CFR 2310.4.

    Dated: August 11, 2011.
Rhea S. Suh,
Assistant Secretary--Policy, Management and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2011-21299 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
§ 779.231 Franchise arrangements which do not create a larger enterprise. ( a ) While it is clear that in every franchise a businessman surrenders some rights, it equally is clear that every franchise does not create a larger enterprise. In the ordinary case a franchise may involve no more than an agreement to sell the particular product of the one granting the franchise. It may also prohibit the sale of a competing product. Such arrangements, standing alone, do not deprive the individual businessman of his “control” so as to bring him into a larger enterprise with the one granting the franchise.
( b ) The portion of the Senate Report quoted in the § 779.229 cites a “bona fide independent automobile dealer” as an example of such a franchise arrangement. (It is recognized that salesmen, mechanics, and partsmen primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles, trucks, trailers, farm implements, or aircraft, employed by nonmanufacturing establishments primarily engaged in the business of selling such vehicles to ultimate purchasers are specifically exempt from the overtime pay provisions under section 13(b)(10) of the Act. Section 779.372 discusses the exemption provided by section 13(b)(10) and its application whether or not the establishment meets the Act's definition of a retail or service establishment. The automobile dealer is used here only as an example of the type of franchise arrangement which, within the intent of the Congress, does not result in creating a larger enterprise.) The methods of operation of the independent automobile dealer are widely known. While he operates under a franchise to sell a particular make of automobile and also may be required to stock certain parts and to maintain specified service facilities, it is clear that he retains the control of the management of his business in those respects which characterize an independent businessman. He determines the prices for which he sells his merchandise. Even if prices are suggested by the manufacturer, it is well known that the dealer exercises wide discretion in this respect, free of control by the manufacturer or distributor. Also the automobile dealer retains control with respect to the management of his business, the determination of his employment practices, the operation of his various departments, and his business policies. The type of business in which he is engaged leaves him wide latitude for the exercise of his judgment and for decisions with respect to important aspects of his business upon which its success or failure depends. On the basis of these considerations, it is evident why the independent automobile dealer was cited as an example of the type of franchise which does not create a larger enterprise encompassing the dealer, the manufacturer or the distributor. Similar facts will lead to the same conclusion in other such arrangements.
<PAGE>

                         [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP]

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

The Stockholder
To the Board of Directors of Litton Loan Servicing LP:

We have examined managements assertion about Litton Loan Servicing LPs
(the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2000, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination of the Companys
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
---------------------------
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
January 12, 2001
§ 151.21 Ships of countries not party to MARPOL 73/78. ( a ) Each oil tanker of 150 gross tons and above and each other ship of 400 gross tons and above, operated under the authority of a country not a party to MARPOL 73/78, must have on board valid documentation showing that the ship has been surveyed in accordance with and complies with the requirements of MARPOL 73/78. Evidence of compliance may be issued by either the government of a country that is party to MARPOL 73/78 or a recognized classification society.
( b ) Evidence of compliance must contain all of the information in, and have substantially the same format as, the IOPP Certificate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1625-0019) [CGD 75-124a, 48 FR 45709, Oct. 6, 1983, as amended by CGD 93-030, 59 FR 51338, Oct. 7, 1994; USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39209, July 12, 2006]
#### § 1902.51 Certification of the records of a hearing.

Upon completion of an informal hearing, the transcript thereof, together with written submissions, exhibits filed during the hearing, and any post-hearing presentations shall be certified by the officer presiding at the hearing to the Assistant Secretary.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00310-CV

In the Interest of A.E.L. §

§

§

§

From the 393rd District Court

of Denton County (2013-60709-

393)

January 16, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: Illinois Department on Aging 

Name of ADRC and Healthcare Partners: 

Suburban Cook County ADRC and Adventist La Grange Memorial Hospital, MacNeal Hospital, 

and Rush University Medical Center 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Janice Cichowlas 

 312.814.8153 

 Janice.Cichowlas@illinois.gov

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Bridge Program 

Project Summary: 

The Illinois Department on Aging (IDOA), in partnership with the suburban Cook County 

ADRC, Illinois Department of Health and Family Services (IDHFS), and the Illinois Department 

of Human Services Division of Rehabilitation Services (IDRS), will oversee local 

implementation of the Bridge Program (Bridge). Bridge was based on a randomized control trial 

care transition program: Enhanced Discharge Planning Program (EDPP) at Rush University 

Medical Center (RUMC), and a rigorously evaluated program - the Aging Resource Center 

(ARC), a program of Aging Care Connections (ACC). AgeOptions, the Area Agency on 

Aging/ADRC for suburban Cook County and the Progress Center for Independent Living (PCIL) 

are the coordinating entities for this Suburban Cook County region. AgeOptions and PCIL will 

train Bridge Care Coordinators regarding community services for seniors and those with 

disabilities in order to improve hospital care transitions. 

Goal/Objectives: 

The primary goals of this grant are 1) to expand existing ADRC transitional care services to 600 

disabled individuals under age 60 and vulnerable adults age 60+ at imminent risk of nursing 

home placement who are discharged from Adventist La Grange Memorial Hospital (ALMH), 

RUMC, and MacNeal Hospital, 2) to implement EDPP protocols to coordinate the connection to 

PCIL, 3) to facilitate a smooth transition back to the community and 4) to replicate the Bridge at 

MacNeal Hospital through another ADRC partner, Solutions for Care (SFC). 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

ADRC program enhancements will reduce re-hospitalizations, promote quality care, enhance 

communication between health care providers and consumers, improve consumer safety, reduce 

caregiver stress and start time for community services, divert consumers from unwanted nursing 

home admission, and reduce emergency department visits.
****

# Sample article

This drop-in article can help you raise awareness of and encourage participation in Older Americans Month. Use it as a fill-in-the-blank template or as inspiration for an original piece.

# Older Americans Month 2018: Engage at Every Age

Across the country, older Americans – a rapidly growing population – are taking part in activities that promote wellness and social connection. They are sharing their wisdom and experience with future generations, and they are giving back to make enrich their communities. They’re working and volunteering, mentoring and learning, leading and engaging. 

For 55 years, Older Americans Month (OAM) has been observed to recognize older Americans and their contributions to our communities. Led by the Administration for Community Living’s Administration on Aging, every May offers opportunity to hear from, support, and celebrate our nation’s elders. This year’s OAM theme, “Engage at Every Age,” emphasizes the importance of being active and involved, no matter where or when you are in life. You are never too old (or too young) to participate in activities that can enrich your physical, mental, and emotion well-being.

It is becoming more apparent that remaining socially engaged can improve the quality of life for older adults. [Organization name] will use OAM 2018 to focus on how older adults in our area are engaging with friends and family, and through various community activities. Throughout the month, [organization name] will conduct activities and share information designed to highlight [local programs, resources, stories, etc.]. We encourage you to get involved by [dependent on goals/activities (e.g., events calendar)].

And, join ACL and AoA in celebrating by participating the Selfie Challenge! They want to see how you’re engaging. Simply take a selfie (or have someone take your photo) and tweet it with the hashtag #OAM18.

[optional signoff or final call to action]

***

Visit the Official OAM Website

Follow ACL on Twitter and Facebook

Follow AoA on Twitter and Facebook

Connect with us: [name(s), phone number/email, and social media sites as applicable] 

Contact your Area Agency on Aging: Visit http://www.eldercare.gov/ or call 1-800- 677-1116

# image1.png
#### Taylor *et al. v.*Fauver *et al.*

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Nov. 18, 1897.)*

[28 S. E. Rep. 317.]

Wills — Construction—Case at Bar.

A clause in a will provided: “Third. The balance I will and bequeath to my sisters or their heirs equal to all” : *held,*where one sister died and left heirs, that they were only entitled to the share which their mother would have taken, had she been alive.

Appeal from circuit court, Augusta county.

Bill by David H. Eauver and others against William M. Taylor and others. Erom a decree in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*J. L. S. Kirby*and *Mead F. White,*for appellants.

*J., J. L. (& B. Bumgardener,*for appellees.

Buchanan, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question involved in this appeal is the construction of the third clause of the will of J. W. Eauver, deceased, which is in the following words: ‘ ‘Third. The balance I will and bequeath to my sisters or their heirs equal to all.” The testator had several sisters who survived him, and one sister who died before his will was written, leaving a number of children, who are the appellants.

*556The contention of the appellants is that each of them is entitled to the same interest in the property disposed of by the residuary clause of the will as is each of the sisters of the testator, and that the court erred in holding that they only took such interest as their mother would have taken, had she been living.

The will is awkwardly drawn, and there is nothing in the other portions of it to throw any light upon the clause under consideration. It is clear, however, from the language used, that the testator intended that each of his sisters who were living at the time of his death should take an equal share of the property disposed of by that clause of the will, and that the children or heirs of each of his sisters who were dead at that time should take a share of equal value, or such a share as their mother would have taken if she had been living at the time the will took effect. This was the construction placed upon that clause by the circuit court,' and is manifestly right.

The decree complained of must be affirmed.

Eiely, J., absent.
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.530 What may the fire main system be used for?

The fire main system may be used only for firefighting and deck washing, unless it is capable of being isolated and can provide the applicable minimum pressures required in § 149.416 of this chapter.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 4 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a President 

pro tempore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election 

of a President pro tempore. 

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be 

2 notified of the election of the Honorable Robert C. Byrd 

3 as President of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS