alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: MARCH 4, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

KMC ACQUISITION CORPORATION d/b/a 

KIRKHILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08S00004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2008-0235 

ORDER OF CIDEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

REASSIGNING AND DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

The above-captioned proceeding is reassigned from Administrative Law Judge Isaac D. 

Benkin to the undersigned. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this 

proceeding shall be served on the undersigned, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons 

on the attached Service List. 

By "Withdrawal of Complaint," served February 10,2015, Complainant states that it 

:. t-;·- .-.. ' 

"withdraws the Complaint in the above-referenced matter."1 Accordingly, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

§ 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

1 The Withdrawal of Complaint's caption shows "Docket No. CP05S00050," which identifies a case in which 

the appeal was dismissed on AprillO, 2007. ABG Caulking Contractors, Inc., FDMS FAA-2005-22888, Doc. No. 

26, http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2005-22888-0026. The Withdrawal of Complaint's case 

title, original case number, and certificate of service, however, are consistent with the above-captioned case. 
Complainant shall send the Judge and the Docket a copy of any compromise order or 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

-2-
FAA Docket No. CP08S00004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

AMENDED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0002 

ONE COPY (Via First-Class Mail, Following CC via Fax, If Shown) 

KMC Acquisition Corporation, d/b/a Kirkhill Mfg., Respondent 

Attn: President 

12023 Woodruff Avenue 

Downey, CA 90241 

Arthur A. Ebbs & NeilL. Wilcove, Respondent's Counsel 

Freeman Mathis & Gary 

100 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1600 

Atlanta, GA 30339 

TEL: 770-818-0000 

FPC(: 770-937-9960 

Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 20636 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FPC(: 404-305-5223 

Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings (M-20) 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FPC(: 202-366-7536 

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-3-
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.631 Detroit River (Trenton Channel). ( a ) The draw of the Grosse Ile Toll Bridge (Bridge Road), mile 8.8, at Grosse Ile, shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) From March 16 through December 14— ( i ) Between the hours of 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., seven days a week and holidays, the draw need open only from three minutes before to three minutes after the hour and half-hour for pleasure craft; for commercial vessels, during this period of time, the draw shall open on signal as soon as possible.
( ii ) Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., the draw shall open on signal for pleasure craft and commercial vessels.
( 2 ) From December 15 through March 15, no bridge tenders are required to be on duty at the bridge and the bridge shall open on signal if at least a twelve-hour advance notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Wayne County highway bridge (Grosse Ile Parkway), mile 5.6, at Grosse Ile, shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) From March 16 through December 14— ( i ) Between the hours of 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., seven days a week and holidays, the draw need open only from three minutes before to three minutes after the quarter and three-quarter hour for pleasure craft, with no opening required at 7:45 a.m., 8:45 a.m., 4:15 p.m. and 5:15 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays; for commercial vessels, during these periods of time, the draw shall open on signal as soon as possible.
( ii ) Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., the draw shall open on signal for pleasure craft and commercial vessels.
( 2 ) From December 15 through March 15, no bridgetenders are required to be on duty at the bridge and the bridge shall open on signal if at least a twelve-hour advance notice is given.
( c ) At all times, the bridges listed in this section shall open as soon as possible for public vessels of the United States, State or local government vessels used for public safety and vessels in distress.
[CGD09 87-07, 52 FR 39520, Oct. 22, 1987, as amended by USCG-2005-21531, 70 FR 36349, June 23, 2005; USCG-2016-0988, 82 FR 15137, Mar. 27, 2017]
§ 154.2104 Pigging system. ( a ) If a pigging system is used to clear cargo in the cargo lines to the tank vessel while the vessel is connected to the facility vapor control system (VCS), the pigging system must be designed with the following safety features: ( 1 ) A bypass loop installed in the main liquid cargo line that contains the pig-receiving device, through which all the liquid flow is channeled during pigging operations. The pig must act as a seal to separate the vessel from the compressed inert gas that is used to propel it as the pig travels from the pig launcher to the pig-receiving device;
( 2 ) A mechanism for restricting liquid and gas flow so that the vessel, personnel, and environment are not endangered. The compressed inert gas flow capacity that this mechanism secures must not be more than 95 percent of the combined capacity of all vessel and facility VCS relief valves located upstream of the facility's remotely operated cargo vapor shutoff valve required by 33 CFR 154.2101(a);
( 3 ) A fast-action automatic shutoff valve such as a solenoid valve, which closes on a high-pressure signal from the pressure sensor required by 33 CFR 154.2103(f), located in the liquid bypass loop downstream of the pig-receiving device;
( 4 ) An interlock with the main cargo line manual block valve so that line-clearing operations cannot begin unless the main cargo line manual block valve is closed; and
( 5 ) An automatic means to detect arrival of the pig at the pig-receiving device.
( b ) If a cargo line clearance system without using pigging is used to clear cargo in the cargo lines to the tank vessel while the vessel is connected to the facility VCS, the cargo line clearance system must be approved by the Commandant.
§ 143.210 Letter of compliance. ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, determines whether a mobile offshore drilling unit which does not hold a valid Coast Guard Certificate of Inspection meets the requirements of § 143.205 or § 143.207 relating to design and equipment standards and issues a letter of compliance for each unit which meets the requirements. Inspection of the unit may be required as part of this determination.
( b ) A letter of compliance issued under paragraph (a) of this section is valid for one year or until the MODU departs the OCS for foreign operations, whichever comes first.
( c ) The owner or operator of a foreign mobile offshore drilling unit requiring a letter of compliance examination must pay the fee prescribed in 46 CFR 2.10-130.
[CGD 84-098a, 53 FR 18981, May 26, 1988, as amended by CGD 91-030, 60 FR 13563, Mar. 13, 1995]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II
    
    RONALD R. REMICKEdward B. Cloues, II
    
    Ronald R. RemickChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
   and TreasurerDate: October 31, 2005
    
    Date: October 31, 2005
#### § 452.80 Bona fide candidates.

A person need not be formally nominated in order to be a bona fide candidate entitled to exercise the rights mentioned in §§ 452.67 and 452.71.[41] Thus, any qualified member seeking to be nominated and elected at a convention would be able to take advantage of the distribution rights even before the convention meets and thus attempt to influence members to select delegates favorable to his candidacy or to persuade the delegates to support his candidacy. A union may reasonably require that a person be nominated in order to be elected, but may not prevent a member who actively seeks office and is otherwise qualified from taking advantage of the campaign safeguards in the Act in an effort to gain the support necessary to be nominated.

###### Footnotes -
  452.80

[41] *Yablonski* v. *United Mine Workers,* 71 LRRM 2606, 60 L.C. 10,204 (D.D.C. 1969).
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 
 
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 16, 2011, Lin Zhi International Inc., 670 Almanor Avenue, Sunnyvale, California 94085, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I3,4-Methylenedioxymeth-amphetamine (7405)
ICocaine (9041)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms) (9273)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances as bulk reagents for use in drug abuse testing. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than October 17, 2011. Dated: August 8, 2011. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2011-21070 Filed 8-17-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 10.27

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

2000 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 by
Tanox, Inc. (the Company),

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Tanox, Inc. 2000 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated May 16, 2001, Amendment No. 2 thereto dated
February 13, 2004, and Amendment No. 3 thereto dated January 27, 2006 (the Plan); and

WHEREAS, the Company
retained the right in Section 12 of the Plan for the Board of Directors of the Company to amend the Plan from time to time; and

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2006, the Board of Directors approved further amending the Plan as set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company agrees that, effective April 17, 2006 (the Amendment 4 Effective Date), the Plan is amended as follows, subject in all respects to the approval hereof by the stockholders of the Company at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2006:



| | 1. | Section 1(h) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows in its entirety:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(h) Consultant means any person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or an Affiliate to render consulting or advisory services and who is compensated for these services. The term
Consultant shall not include Directors who are merely paid a directors fee by the Company for their services as Directors.



| | 2. | Section 1(q) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows in its entirety:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(q) Non-Employee Directormeans a Director who is not an Employee or Consultant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment this 28th day of April, 2006.



TANOX, INC.By:

Gregory GuidrozName:

Gregory GuidrozTitle:

Vice PresidentFinance
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy A. Davenport, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Timothy A. Davenport              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Timothy A. Davenport                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 12, 2003                     |

 

 

Signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Vastera, Inc. and will be retained by Vastera, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA No. 00-1110; MM Docket No. 00-28; RM-9796] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document dismisses a proposal filed by Christine Radio Broadcasting Company requesting the allotment of Channel 245A at Christine, Texas, as the community's first local service.                         *See*65 FR 11537, March 3, 2000. As stated in the                         *Notice,*                         a showing of continuing interest is required before a channel will be allotted. Since there has been no interest expressed for the allotment of a channel at Christine, the                         *Report and Order*                         dismisses the proposal.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 00-28, adopted May 10, 2000, and released May 19, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-13597 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 143.301 Load line requirements. ( a ) Vessels, including foreign vessels, which would be subject to the requirements of subchapter E of 46 CFR chapter I concerning load lines when arriving at or proceeding to sea from any port or place within the United States must comply with those requirements when engaged in activities on the OCS.
( b ) Load line certificates and load line exemption certificates issued or accepted under subchapter E of 46 CFR chapter I are accepted as evidence of compliance with paragraph (a) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          17,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      228
<ALLOWANCES>                                       147
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         203,668
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        192,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,174
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,747)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,851
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,749
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,039)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,039)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,602
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
        

  








</TABLE>
Board of Taxation

No. 6945

#### Ivan Roberts v. Town of Hampton

June 30, 1975

*R. Laurence Cullen,*by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *Charles G. Cleaveland,*assistant attorney general *( Mr. Cleaveland*orally), for the State.

Per curiam.

The question to be decided in this case is whether the State board of taxation has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the assessment of sewer rents by the town of Hampton, New Hampshire. RSA 76:16-a I (Supp. 1973) (Abatement of Taxes by Board of Taxation); *see*RSA 252:6 (Contracts; Sewerage or Waste Treatment Facilities), :10 (Supp. 1973) (Sewer Rentals).

Plaintiff resides on Exeter Road in the town of Hampton in the vicinity of the Hampton-Exeter town line. In 1968 the residents of Hampton who lived near the town line petitioned the town requesting a sewer line to be extended to their homes. The town passed an article appropriating $ 18,000 for installation of the requested sewer line. Later investigation by the Hampton selectmen disclosed that the cost of extending existing Hampton sewer lines would be prohibitive with the result that the selectmen made an agreement with the town of Exeter whereby Exeter would furnish the needed sewer line. RSA 252:6.

By a letter dated August 21, 1971, the Hampton town manager advised the residents in the area of the town line who were benefited by the new sewer line from Exeter that “[t]he annual charge made by the Town of Exeter to the Town of Hampton for sewer services, according to the agreement, must ultimately be the responsibility of the users.” *See*RSA 252:10 (Supp. 1973). On July 18, 1973, plaintiff’s request that the Hampton tax assessors abate the sewer rent was denied due to the lack of authority to do so on the part of *347the assessors. *See*RSA 252:14 (Abatement of Assessments), :15 (Petition to Court). Plaintiff appealed to this court from the decision of the State board of taxation dated April 29, 1974, dismissing the abatement request for want of jurisdiction. RSA 71-B:22 (Supp. 1973) (Appeal from Board of Taxation); RSA 76:16-a V (Supp. 1973).

The jurisdiction of the State board of taxation is specifically limited by statute to “matters involving questions of taxation properly brought before it.” RSA 7l-B:5 I (Supp. 1973) (Board of Taxation: Authority); *see*RSA 71-BT1 (Supp. 1973) (Board of Taxation: Jurisdiction). Since this court has determined that sewer rents are not taxes, the board of taxation correctly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to decide plaintiff’s claim. *Opinion of the Justices,*93 N.H. 478, 482, 39 A.2d 765, 767 (1944); *see Niemiec v. King,*109 N.H. 586, 588, 258 A.2d 356, 358 (1969); *Bigwood v. Merrimack Village District,*108 N.H. 83, 88, 229 A.2d 341, 345 (1967).

*Appeal dismissed.*
----

----

I Teave

Komisjon

----

ÜHTNE PÕLLUKULTUURIDE SORDILEHT

22. tervikväljaande 14. lisa

(2004/C 279 A/01)

SISUKORD

Selgitavad märkused

Põllukultuuride liikide loetelu

SELGITAVAD MÄRKUSED

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

2.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

9.BROMUS CATHARTICUS VAHL

10.BROMUS SITCHENSIS TRIN.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

16A.× FESTULOLIUM

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

30.LOTUS CORNICULATUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

37.ONOBRYCHIS VICIIFOLIA SCOP.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

49.VICIA VILLOSA ROTH.

50.BRASSICA NAPUS L. VAR. NAPOBRASSICA (L.) RCHB.

52.PHACELIA TANACETIFOLIA BENTH.

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

55.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. SILVESTRIS (LAM.) BRIGGS

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----

(1)ELT C 91 A, 16.4.2003. Kataloogi on viimati muudetud 13. lisaga (ELT C 232 A, 17.9.2004, lk 1).

(2)EÜT L 193, 20.7.2002, lk 1.

----