alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 137.25 Qualifications of the environmental professional. ( a ) An environmental professional is an individual who possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of the presence or likely presence of oil at a facility and the real property on which the facility is located sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors in § 137.30(a) and (b). ( 1 ) Such a person must— ( i ) Hold a current Professional Engineer's or Professional Geologist's license or registration from a State, tribe, or U.S. territory (or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) and have the equivalent of 3 years of full-time relevant experience;
( ii ) Be licensed or certified by the Federal government, a State, tribe, or U.S. territory (or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) to perform environmental inquiries under § 137.35 and have the equivalent of 3 years of full-time relevant experience;
( iii ) Have a Baccalaureate or higher degree from an accredited institution of higher education in a discipline of engineering or science and the equivalent of 5 years of full-time relevant experience; or
( iv ) Have the equivalent of 10 years of full-time relevant experience.
( 2 ) An environmental professional should remain current in his or her field through participation in continuing education or other activities.
( 3 ) The requirements for an environmental professional in this section do not preempt State professional licensing or registration requirements, such as those for a professional geologist, engineer, or site-remediation professional. Before commencing work, a person should determine the applicability of State professional licensing or registration laws to the activities to be undertaken as part of an inquiry under § 137.35(b).
( 4 ) A person who does not qualify as an environmental professional under this section may assist in the conduct of all appropriate inquiries according to this part if the person is under the supervision or responsible charge of an environmental professional meeting the requirements of this section when conducting the inquiries.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MARCH 26, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12764

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00221-CR-ORL-31-KRS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT D. POWERS,

Plaintiff-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(March 26, 2009)

Before BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, District Judge.

*

PER CURIAM:

Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of *

Michigan, sitting by designation.
Defendant Robert D. Powers was indicted for failing to register as required

by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C.

§ 16913, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Powers moved to dismiss the

indictment, and, after hearing argument, the district court declared 18 U.S.C.

§ 2250 facially unconstitutional, dismissed the indictment, and ordered Powers

released. United States v. Powers, 544 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 1336 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

On appeal, the Government argues the district court erred in holding 18 U.S.C.

§ 2250(a) facially unconstitutional as an invalid exercise of Congress’s Commerce

Clause power.

In United States v. Ambert, __ F.3d __, No. 08-13139, 2009 WL 564677

(11th Cir. March 6, 2009), this Court held both the registration provisions set forth

at 42 U.S.C. § 16913 and the failure to register offense set forth at 18 U.S.C.

§ 2250(a) do not violate the Commerce Clause. Id. at *8-9. We concluded

§ 2250 falls within Congress’s power to regulate “both the use of channels of

interstate commerce and the instrumentalities of interstate commerce.” Id. at *8.

We also concluded “the requirement that sex offenders register under § 16913 is

necessary to track those offenders who move from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.” Id.

at *10.

2
Ambert controls here. The district court erred in dismissing the indictment

against Powers on the ground that SORNA exceeded Congress’s authority under

the Commerce Clause. Accordingly, we vacate the order of the district court and

remand for reinstatement of the indictment.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

3
DELTA FUNDING CORPORATION (LOGO)
1000 Woodbury Road
Woodbury, NY  11797-9003
800-225-5335  Website: http://www.deltafunding.com


February 25, 2000

MANAGEMENT ASSERTION

As of an for the year ended  December 31, 1999,  Delta Funding  Corporation  has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for  Mortgage  Bankers.  As of and for this same period,  Delta  Funding
Corporation  had in effect  an  errors  and  omissions  policy in the  amount of
$10,000,000, and maintained a fidelity bond in the amount of $5,000,000.


Hugh Miller
President and Chief Executive Officer

Richard Blass
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Frank Pellegrin
Executive Vice President, Loan Servicing


California: Licensed by the Department of Corporations under the California
Residential Mortgage Lending Act. Georgia: Residential Mortgage Licensee.
Illinois: Residential Mortgage Licensee #4063. One Oak Hill Center, Suite 300,
Westmont. IL 60599. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Mortgage Lender ML0635 New
Hampshire: Mortgage Banker. MB 2676; Second Mortgage Home Loan Lender,
3039-97MHL New Jersey: Licensed Mortgage Banker, New Jersey Department of
Banking and Insurance. New York: Licensed Mortgage Banker-NYS Banking
Department. Rhode Island: Licensed lender.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0415. ANTHONY HUNT v. THE STATE.

Anthony Hunt was convicted of malice murder, felony murder and aggravated

assault, and the Supreme Court affirmed his convictions on appeal. See Hunt v. State,

278 Ga. 479 (604 SE2d 144) (2004). Huntsubsequently filed an extraordinarymotion

for new trial, which the trial court denied. Hunt then filed this application for

discretionary appeal in our Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Under our Constitution, the SupremeCourt has appellate jurisdiction over "[a]ll

casesin which a sentence of death wasimposed or could be imposed." See Ga. Const.

of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be imposed for

the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See OCGA §

17-10-30 (b); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012) (Hunstein, C.

J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (1) (322 SE2d 711) (1984)

(directing this Court to transfer "all casesin which either a sentence of death or of life

imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of murder"). Accordingly, Hunt’s

application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

June 29, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/29/2016
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2005 ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Dated: November 9, 2004
    /s/ Warren D. EdwardsWarren D. Edwards,Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART 5 FDS FOR 1996 FORM 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          37,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,973
<PP&E>                                               4
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,431
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    879
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (317)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended October 3, 2009 of K-Tron International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   EDWARD B. CLOUES, IIEdward B. Cloues, IIChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Main Street Trust,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
B. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  David B. White
-----------------------
David B. White
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2005


                                       1
#### § 114.05 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this subchapter:

*Approved* means approved by the Commandant unless otherwise stated.

*Bridge* means a structure erected across navigable waters of the United States, and includes causeways, approaches, fenders, and other appurtenances thereto.

*Coast Guard District Commander or District Commander* means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant to command all Coast Guard activities within his or her district. (See part 3 of this chapter for descriptions of Coast Guard Districts.)

*Commandant* means Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20593.

*Deputy Commandant for Operations* means the officer of the Coast Guard designated by the Commandant as the staff officer in charge of “Operations” (DCO), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters.

*District Office or Coast Guard District Office* means the Office of the Commander of a Coast Guard District.

*Headquarters or Coast Guard Headquarters* means the Office of the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20593-7000.

*Permit* means the license permitting construction of bridges and approaches thereto in or over navigable waters of the United States, issued under the rules and regulations in this subchapter.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Homeland Security or any person to whom he or she has delegated his or her authority in the matter concerned.

*United States Coast Guard or Coast Guard* means the organization or agency established by the Act of January 28, 1915, as amended (14 U.S.C. 101).

[USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37313, June 21, 2012, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58278, Sept. 18, 2020]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN,

Petitioner

v.

HON. DONNA JO MCDANIEL OF THE 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 17 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief 

is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the 

caption.
<PAGE>

                         [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP]

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

Partners of Litton Loan Servicing LP:

We have examined managements assertion about Litton Loan Servicing LPs
(the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination of the Companys
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
---------------------------
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
January 10, 2003
Motion Granted and Order filed September 9, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00699

- CV

____________ IN RE MARK ATHANS, O MAR MARTINEZ AND PRESTIGE SURGICAL A SSISTANTS, LLC , Relators

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 05129



### ORDER
On August 27, 2014, relator s Mark Athans, Omar Martinez
, and Prestige Surgical Assistants, LLC, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.
Relator s ask this court to compel the Honorable Larry Weiman
, presiding judge of
the 80th District Court of Harris County, to vacate an order dated May 29, 20142 granting a motion for new trial filed by real party in interest American Surgical Assistants, Inc.

Relators also filed a motion for a temporary stay of the underlying proceedings. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On August 28, 2014, relators asked this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. The same day, t h e real party in interest filed a response to relators’ motion to stay in which it states that it does not oppose relators’ motion and agrees the trial court proceedings should be stayed.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that rel ator s’ request for mandamus relief requires further consideration
, and that judicial economy will best be served by a grant of temporary relief. We therefore GRANT
relator s ’ motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER all proceedings in trial court caus e number 2013

- 05129 , styled American Surgical Assistants, Inc. d/b/a American Surgical Professionals v. Mark Athans, et al.
, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators ’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.
#### § 147.5 Delegation of authority.

The authority to establish safety zones and to issue and enforce safety zone regulations in accordance with the provisions of this part is delegated to District Commanders.
they suffered monetary damages for their remaining claims to be viable.

Accordingly, we vacate the district court's summary judgment.'

In light of our conclusion that summary judgment was improperly granted, we vacate the district court's June 5, 2012, order awarding attorney fees, costs, and damages to Rosemere, as Rosemere at this point is not the prevailing party. For the same reasons, we vacate the district court's August 13, 2012, order awarding supplemental attorney fees that the Lytles are challenging in Docket No. 61308.

Consistent with the foregoing, we ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order. 2

Saitta 

# m79244 , J. Gibbons

1 We have considered Rosemere's alternative arguments as to why the Lytles' claims fail on their merits. Based on the current record, we are unable to determine that all aspects of the Lytles' claims would fail as a matter of law.

2 To the extent that our resolution of these appeals may appear inconsistent with our resolution of the appeal in Docket No. 63942, we note that our resolution of these appeals was premised in part on the Lytles' stipulation as to the amended CC&Rs' validity.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A Ca

Tipcc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge Sterling Law, LLC Leach Johnson Song & Gruchow Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### e 3 r.:Suga
# FiscalYear2012_Budget
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

### DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF

### AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 9TH FLOOR 

### L & C 

### ANNEX

401 CHURCH STREET NASHVILLE, 

### TN 37243-1531 CertifiedMail #70110110000040086836 Return Receipt Requested

Mrs. Gwendolyn Keys Fleming Regional Administrator US.EPA, Region 

### IV Atlanta Federal Center, 12"~loor 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 Subject: OEcial Submittal Request for State Implementation Plan revisions to des 1200-03-09-.01 Construction Permits and 1200-03-09-.02 Operating Permits. These rules are being amended to include the Federal requirements for Greenhouse Gas PermittingRegulations into the State ImplementationPlan. Dear Mrs. Fleming: This is 

### an official submittal request for incorporationinto State Implementation Plan revisions to rules 1200-03-09-.O1 Construction Permits and 1200-03-09-.02Operating Permits. These rules are being amended to include the Federal requirements for Greenhouse Gas Permitting Regulations into the StateImplementation Plan. As required one copy is included with supporting documentation consisting of a certification of the rules as State effective with the Board order adopting the rule change, a Regulatory Flexibility Addendum, a Impact on Local 

### Governments, Additional Information Required by Joint Government Operations Committee, evidence of a public hearing with notices and comments, and a State effective copy of Chapter 1200-03-09with the rules included as State effective. Also included is a compact disk containing the documents in Microsoft Word and a hard copy of the rules showing the language change indicated by the strikethrough and redline marks. The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally approved StateImplementationPlan. If you need furfherinformation or documentationplease contact Malcolm Butler at (615) 532-0600. Sincerely,

A 

### BarryR: Stephens, P.E. Technical Secretary TennesseeAir Pollution Control Board Enclosures CC: 

### Mr. R. ScottDavis. Branch Chief