alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Submitted on record and briefs September 1,

conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing September 30, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*BRUCE ANTHONY RUND, *Appellant.*

(C900929CR; CA A70428)

837 P2d 563

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Ingrid A. MacFarlane, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and De Muniz, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*383PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a 5-year period of post-prison supervision. OAR 253-05-002(2) (c) prescribes a 3-year period in this case.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 12 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 12

   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
             Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
             Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Terrance W. Gainer as Sergeant at Arms 
and Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
§ 778.304 Amounts deducted from cash wages—general. ( a ) The word “deduction” is often loosely used to cover reductions in pay resulting from several causes: ( 1 ) Deductions to cover the cost to the employer of furnishing “board, lodging or other facilities,” within the meaning of section 3(m) of the Act.
( 2 ) Deductions for other items such as tools and uniforms which are not regarded as “facilities.”
( 3 ) Deductions authorized by the employee (such as union dues) or required by law (such as taxes and garnishments).
( 4 ) Reductions in a fixed salary paid for a fixed workweek in weeks in which the employee fails to work the full schedule.
( 5 ) Deductions for disciplinary reasons.
( b ) In general, where such deductions are made, the employee's “regular rate” is the same as it would have been if the occasion for the deduction had not arisen. Also, as explained in part 531 of this chapter, the requirements of the Act place certain limitations on the making of some of the above deductions.
[33 FR 986, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended at 46 FR 7314, Jan. 23, 1981]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE - SFAS NO 128 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LUKENS INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-30-1996
<CASH>                           10,424
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   135,381
<ALLOWANCES>                      6,990
<INVENTORY>                     180,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                329,201
<PP&E>                          928,437
<DEPRECIATION>                  390,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  969,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           185,471
<BONDS>                         268,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                      29,607
<COMMON>                            158
<OTHER-SE>                      262,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    969,369
<SALES>                         264,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                264,172
<CGS>                           252,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   252,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  1,666
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                3,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (6,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (2,591)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (4,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (4,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.33)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.1091 Menomonee River.

The draw of the Ogden-First Street bridge, mile 0.4 at Marinette, shall open on signal from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. from May 1 through October 31. From 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. from May 1 through October 31, the draw shall open on signal if at least two hours notice is given. From November 1 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
Exhibit 4.16

 

Translation

 

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT (25) TO POLYSILICON SUPPLY CONTRACT

 

Party B’s Contract No.: TCZ-A1130-0803-CGC-120-2015-W4

 

Buyer: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (“Party A”)

Address: No.2 Tianhe Road, Trina PV Industrial Park, Xinbei District, Changzhou, Jiangsu

 

Seller: GCL-Poly (Suzhou) New Energy Co., Ltd. (“Party B”)

Address: Room 1901, Building 24, Times Square, Huachi Street, Suzhou Industrial Park, Jiangsu

 

The buyer and the seller entered into the Supplementary Agreement (24) to Polysilicon Supply Contract in relation to the supply of silicon wafers on February 12, 2015 (the buyer’s contract number is TCZ-A1130-0803-CGC-120-2015-W0, the seller’s contract number is SSC000119) (the “Original Contract”). After consultation on the basis of equality and freewill, both parties reach the following supplementary agreement to the Original Contract on March 16, 2015.

 

1.                                      Both parties agree to amend Clause 1.2.1 of the Original Contract as follows:

 

1)                                     the monthly purchase quantities set out in the Annual Purchase Schedule can be adjusted, provided that the amount increased or decreased through such adjustment shall not exceed 15% of the original amount. If a monthly purchase quantity set out in the Annual Purchase Schedule has been adjusted to 85% of the original amount, then such quantity will be referred as “Minimum Monthly Purchase Quantity”. Any difference between the actual monthly purchase quantity and the Minimum Monthly Purchase Quantity shall be deemed as the quantity of goods that the Buyer rejects to take the delivery.

 

2)                                     the annual purchase quantity for 2015 can be adjusted, provided that the amount increased or decreased through such adjustment shall not exceed 15% of the original amount. If the Buyer achieves an early completion of the annual purchase quantity as set out in Clause 1.1.1 in 2015, then the minimum monthly purchase quantity provided in this clause shall not be binding upon the Buyer for the remaining months of 2015.

 

2.                                      Any issues not covered in this Agreement shall be subject to the Original Contract. Should there be any conflicts between the Original Contract and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail.

 

3.                                      This Agreement shall take effect after being sealed by the buyer and the seller.

 

4.                                      This Agreement shall be made in seven copies, with the buyer holding two copies and the seller holding five copies. Each copy shall have the same legal effect.

 

(No Text Below)

 











 

Buyer: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Party A’s Seal)

Legal Representative or Authorized Representative (Signature):

[Company Seal is Affixed]

Date:

 

Seller: GCL-Poly (Suzhou) New Energy Co., Ltd. (Party B’s Seal)

Legal Representative or Authorized Representative (Signature): /s/

[Company Seal is Affixed]

Date:
DOWNEY SAVINGS

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officers Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A)  I have reviewed the activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
     preceding  fiscal year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
     Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
     to the best of these officers knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
     its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations  under  these  Agreements
     throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or  failure of the
     Servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations, a
     description  of each  default or failure and the nature and status  thereof
     has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA.;

(B)  I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
     Servicer in good standing:

(C)  I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
     Policy  and any other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
     Agreement,   Trust  Agreement,   Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  and/or
     Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect,

(D)  All premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (If
     applicable) and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable)  with
     respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and that all such
     insurance policies are in full force and effect.

(E)  All real estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
     accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance on
     any Mortgage Property, have been paid,or if any such costs or expenses have
     not been paid with respect to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for the
     non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G)  All annual reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
     required per section 6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
     respectively, have bee prepared and filed.


Certified By:
Officer Doug Pollock

Vice President
Title

12/14/00
Date


DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A.
Corporate Headquarters: 3501 Jamboree Road - P.O. Box 6000
Newport Beach, California 92658 - 949/854-3100
[Cite as State v. Cooley , 2024

- Ohio

- 123.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO

,

Appellee,

- vs

-

KEORIE D. COOLEY,

Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2023

- 07

- 073

D E C I S I O N

1/16/2024

APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CR2022

- 12

- 1699

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and John C. Heinkel , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Christopher P. Frederick , for appellant.

Per Curiam

.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Keorie D. Cooley , the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the tran script

of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967)

, which (1) indicates that a careful reviewButler CA2023

- 07

- 073

- 2

- of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently t o determine

whether the proceed ings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to with draw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of

both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel

for appella nt requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON , P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL

, JJ., concur.

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: Mr. Keorie D. Cooley, #A817438, Lebanon Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 56

, Lebanon, OH 45036

.[Cite as State v. Cooley , 2024

- Ohio

- 123.]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Artemis International Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Ternier,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                                             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                                             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Patrick Ternier     |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Patrick  Ternier         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | July  12, 2004           |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

To:	Federal	Aviation	Administration

Re:	Petition	for	Section	333	Exemption

From:

Joseph	Craft

SkyVista Productions

122 Cottonwood St NE

Lonsdale, MN 55046

12/14/15

UAS:

Manufacturer:

Yuneec Electric Aviation

5555 Ontario Mills Parkway

Ontario, CA 91764

Model:

Yuneec Q5004K

Serial number: YU15360292B04C01

Battery: 5400mAh 3S 11.1C LiPo

Maximum altitude: 400ft above ground level

Maximum Descent Speed: 2m/s

Maximum Flight Speed 17mph
 2

Product weights with battery and payload: 60oz

The drone features a No Fly Zone monitoring system using built-in GPS that ensures the drone 

does not operate in no fly zones in compliance with FAA regulations

Radio Frequency 2.4GHz

Video Transmission Range: FCC Compliance up to 600m (1968.5ft)

Camera: CG03

Video Resolution: UHD: 4K at 30FPS, 2.7k at 30FPS, 2.5k at 30FPS – FULL HD: 1080p at 

24/25/30/48/50/60/120FPS

Photo Resolution: 12 Megapixels

Usage:

The primary usage of the UAS Yuneec G50004k multi-rotor drone will be for residential and 

commercial real estate photography. The secondary usage of this unit will be for other 

agricultural videography including land analysis. The tertiary use of this unit will be for 

miscellaneous recreational, non-commercial use.

Flight Conditions:

The speed of the drone is to not exceed 17mph as set by manufacturers specifications. The 

maximum altitude is 400ft above ground level. The drone is to not ever be flown out of the 

operators line-of-site, nor will it ever be flown above clouds and out of the line-of-site for the 

operator.

Area:

The area in which this UAS will be used is in the Southern Metro/Twin Cities area, primarily in 

Lonsdale, MN. The UAS will never be used in restricted airspace in accordance to the most upto-date FAA regulations. Altitude will remain in accordance to FAA regulations, and should 
 3

never exceed 200ft in altitude. The UAS system, Yuneec G50004k comes equipped with a 

“Geo-Fence” feature, which prevents the drone from ever going further than 300 feet away from 

the operator.

The primary characteristics of the usage area are going to be farmland/rural. The only potential 

hazards for the area are farm buildings and/or trees if in the area.

Safety Procedures:

The drone will go through a strenuous pre-flight inspection including checks to ensure all motors 

spin freely, the landing mechanism/feet are in operating condition, and that the remote control is 

fully operational and maintains proper communication to the aircraft. The props will be 

tightened and properly secured before each flight.

Pre-flight Safety Assessment: 

Pre-flight procedures would mandate the drone be placed no less than 1,000ft from any

structures, and 30ft from the operator. Pre-flight safety assessment would ensure there are no 

people, or other hazards in the immediate area
 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-67-000]

Take notice that on May 10, 2000, Strategic Power Management, Inc. (SPM) filed a supplement to its Complaint filed on April 20, 2000 pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Regulations, 18 CFR 385.206 and Section 206 of the Federal Power Act.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protect this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211                           ( print page 35919)                        and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the supplement to the compliant shall also be due on or before June 12, 2000.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14119 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.3 What Federal agencies are responsible for implementing the Deepwater Port Act? ( a ) Under delegations from the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Transportation, the Coast Guard and MARAD coordinate with each other in processing applications for the issuance, transfer, or amendment of a license for the construction and operation of a deepwater port.
( b ) MARAD is responsible for issuing the Record of Decision to announce whether a license application is approved, approved with conditions, or denied, and for issuing, revoking, and reinstating deepwater port licenses. MARAD also has authority over the approval of fees charged by Adjacent Coastal States, and certain matters relating to international policy, civil actions, and suspension or termination of licenses.
( c ) The Secretary of Transportation has delegated authority over pipeline matters to the Pipeline Hazardous Materials and Safety Administration.
( d ) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in the Department of Interior, and other Federal agencies are designated as cooperating agencies and support the Coast Guard and MARAD in the review and evaluation of deepwater port license applications. You can view the interagency memorandum of understanding (MOU) outlining the relative roles and responsibilities of these and other Federal agencies at: *http://www.uscg.mil/hq/G-P/mso/docs/*
*dwp_white_house_task_force_* *energy_streamlining.pdf.* [USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2011-0257, 76 FR 31837, June 2, 2011; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39175, July 1, 2013]
#### § 127.1107 Electrical systems.

Electrical equipment and wiring must be of the kind specified by, and must be installed in accordance with, NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference, see § 127.003).

[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]