1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Case No. 13-222V

Filed: March 17, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MARY E THOMPSON, * UNPUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Special Master Dorsey

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Reasonable Amount Requested to which

* Respondent does not Object.

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lisa A. Roquemore, Law Offices of Lisa A. Roquemore, Irvine, CA, for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On March 28, 2013, Mary E. Thompson (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner 

alleged that she developed headaches, chest pain, fatigue, dizziness and disorientation as a result 

of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“TDaP”) vaccination she received on April 11, 2012. 

 

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which 

to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or 

commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes 

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the 

public. Id.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 

42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to 

individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
2

See Petition at 2, 6. On February 27, 2015, the undersigned entered a decision awarding 

compensation to petitioner based on a joint stipulation filed by the parties. 

On March 16, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation concerning attorneys’ fees and costs. 

The parties stipulate to a total award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $60,000.00. In 

accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner personally 

incurred out-of-pocket costs in the amount of $2,350.00.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 

300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of any objection by 

respondent, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees 

and costs. 

Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, 

Lisa A. Roquemore, of the Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore, in the amount of 

$60,000.00; and

2) in the form of a check payable to petitioner only in the amount of $2,350.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Special Master

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of 

notice renouncing the right to seek review.