alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-11104

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAYMUNDO DIAZ CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-3-5-C

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raymundo Diaz Cruz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction

for distribution of less than 500 grams of cocaine. He argues

that the district court abused its authority by imposing his

sentence for the instant offense to run consecutively to his

prior undischarged term of imprisonment. The Government asserts

that Cruz’s challenge is barred by the waiver of his right to

appeal, as set forth in his written plea bargain agreement. In
No. 04-11104

-2-

reply, Cruz contends that his appeal is not barred because his

sentence was imposed in violation of law.

As Cruz has not challenged the validity of the waiver of his

right to appeal, that waiver provision shall be enforced. See

United States v. Sharpe, 193 F.3d 852, 871 (5th Cir. 1999). This

court reviews de novo whether a waiver of appeal provision bars

an appeal. United States v. Baymon, 312 F.3d 725, 727 (5th Cir.

2002). Although Cruz argues that this court may review his

challenge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1) because the sentence

was imposed in violation of law, Cruz explicitly waived his right

to appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 in his plea bargain agreement. 

Because Cruz’s challenge to his sentence is encompassed by the

waiver of his right to appeal, this appeal is DISMISSED. See

United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.511 West Pearl River.

The draw of the US 90 bridge, mile 7.9 near Pearlington, shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.

[USCG-2014-0197, 79 FR 33863, June 13, 2014]
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David J. Hegarty, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Senior Housing PropertiesTrust;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  | October 28, 2004 |   | /s/ David J. Hegarty                  |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |             |   | David J. Hegarty                      |
|   |             |   | President and Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0243

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

BRANDON LEE CRAFT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court 

Reporter Sheena Jendro Cobb is granted an extension of time to and 

including December 23, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

the transcripts requested on appeal.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 27 2020

10/27/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0243
Exhibit 32.1
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II

Edward B. Cloues, II
    
    
    
    RONALD R. REMICK

Ronald R. RemickChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and TreasurerDate: August 4, 2008
    
    
    
    Date: August 4, 2008
### Floods of March-April 1951 in Alabama and adjacent states

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1227A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 144.10-1 Lifesaving equipment.

(a) Except as allowed in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may be on an unmanned platform unless the following lifesaving equipment is readily accessible on the platform:

(1) A life preserver or a Type I—Personal flotation device, listed in Table 1, for each person.

| Devices marked | Equivalent to performance type marked |
| --- | --- |
| 160.002 Life preserver | Type I—Personal flotation device. |
| 160.003 Life preserver | Type I—Personal flotation device. |
| 160.004 Life preserver | Type I—Personal flotation device. |
| 160.005 Life preserver | Type I—Personal flotation device. |
| 160.055 Life preserver | Type I—Personal flotation device. |

Table 1—Life Preservers and Equivalent Performance Flotation Devices

(2) An approved ring life buoy (Type IV PFD) for every two persons, but no more than four devices are required. Each ring life buoy must be of a type constructed in accordance with 46 CFR subpart 160.050; except a ring life buoy that was approved under former 46 CFR subpart 160.009 may be used as long as it is in good and serviceable condition.

(3) Each ring life buoy under paragraph (a)(2) of this section must have an approved automatic electric water light that is attached as described in § 144.01-25(b).

(b) The ring life buoys required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may be kept on a manned vessel that remains alongside the platform if there is no available space to keep them on the platform.

[CGD 73-177R, 40 FR 8176, Feb. 26, 1975, as amended by CGD 80-155b, 47 FR 10533, Mar. 11, 1982]
§ 801.35 Disclosure of test information. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of any information obtained during a polygraph test by any person, other than the examinee, directly or indirectly, except as follows: ( a ) A polygraph examiner or an employer (other than an employer exempt under section 7 (a), (b), or (c) of the Act (described in §§ 801.10 and 801.11 of this part)) may disclose information acquired from a polygraph test only to: ( 1 ) The examinee or an individual specifically designated in writing by the examinee to receive such information;
( 2 ) The employer that requested the polygraph test pursuant to the provisions of this Act (including management personnel of the employer where the disclosure is relevant to the carrying out of their job responsibilities);
( 3 ) Any court, governmental agency, arbitrator, or mediator pursuant to an order from a court of competent jurisdiction requiring the production of such information;
( 4 ) The Secretary of Labor, or the Secretary's representative, when specifically designated in writing by the examinee to receive such information.
( b ) An employer may disclose information from the polygraph test at any time to an appropriate governmental agency without the need of a court order where, and only insofar as, the information disclosed is an admission of criminal conduct.
( c ) A polygraph examiner may disclose test charts, without identifying information (but not other examination materials and records), to another examiner(s) for examination and analysis, provided that such disclosure is for the sole purpose of consultation and review of the initial examiner's opinion concerning the indications of truthfulness or deception. Such action would not constitute disclosure under this part provided that the other examiner has no direct or indirect interest in the matter.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Joachim J. Brown,certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting, and;

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)             All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)            Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  | July 7, 2005 | /s/ Joachim J. Brown                   |
|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |              | Joachim J. Brown                       |
|   |              | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.312 What are the launching equipment requirements for inflatable liferafts? ( a ) Each inflatable liferaft not intended for davit launching must be capable of rapid deployment.
( b ) Each liferaft capable of being launched by a davit must have the following launching equipment at each launching station: ( 1 ) A launching device approved under approval series 160.163; and
( 2 ) A mechanical disengaging apparatus approved under approval series 160.170.
( c ) The launching equipment must be operable, both from within the liferaft and from the deepwater port.
( d ) Winch controls must be located so that the operator can observe the liferaft launching.
( e ) The launching equipment must be arranged so that a loaded liferaft does not have to be lifted before it is lowered.
( f ) Not more than two liferafts may be launched from the same set of launching equipment.
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Joan W. Brubacher, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mobility Electronics,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     /s/ Joan W. BrubacherJoan W. BrubacherChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2003
-26-
ACL Protection and Advocacy: Traumatic Brain Injury Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2018 Annual Allocation

5/17/2018

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy: 

Traumatic Brain 

Injury (PATBI)

Alabama $55,998

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $71,962

Arkansas $50,000

California $321,491

Colorado $61,226

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $177,592

Georgia $98,053

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $117,287

Indiana $69,662

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $52,706

Louisiana $54,595

Maine $50,000

Maryland $64,901

Massachusetts $71,041

Michigan $95,103

Minnesota $61,067

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $65,492

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $87,507

New Mexico $50,000

New York $170,897

North Carolina $96,790

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $108,121

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,054

Pennsylvania $117,153

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $56,753

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $69,802

Texas $233,569

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $83,395

Washington $74,718

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $63,065

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $20,000

Guam $20,000

Northern Mariana Islands $20,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $20,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $20,000

TOTAL $4,000,000
Administration for Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

http://transition.acf.hhs.gov/programs/aidd

Fact Sheet: University Centers for Excellence in 

Developmental Disabilities Education, Research & Service

The University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and 

Service (UCEDDs) are unique among Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 

(AIDD) program grantees in that they are affiliated with universities. This connection enables the 

68 UCEDDs located throughout the United States and its territories to serve as liaisons between 

academia and the community.

UCEDDs receive a discretionary grant that is awarded to 

interdisciplinary education, research, and public service 

units of universities, or public or nonprofit entities 

associated with universities. AIDD funding is used to 

support the organizational foundation of UCEDDs, which 

allows the grantees to pursue other sources of support 

to conduct various activities. UCEDDs leverage funding 

from a variety of sources, including federal, state, and local 

agencies; private foundations; donations; and fee-forservice earnings.

Addressing Issues, Finding Solutions, Advancing 

Research

UCEDDs are a nationwide network of independent but 

interlinked centers, representing an expansive national 

resource for addressing issues, finding solutions, and 

advancing research related to the needs of individuals with 

developmental disabilities and their families.

Four core functions frame the UCEDD program: 

•	 Interdisciplinary pre-service preparation and continuing education 

•	 Research, including basic or applied research, evaluation, and public policy analysis 

•	 Information dissemination

•	 Community services, including direct services, training, technical assistance, and model 

demonstrations

Representing a broad range of disabilities, UCEDDs support activities that address various 

issues, from prevention to early intervention to supported employment. Additional grants may be 

awarded to UCEDDs to conduct national training and other initiatives. Current training initiatives 

are funded to support post-secondary education opportunities for people with developmental 

disabilities and to enhance self-determination skills, and two grants focus on partnerships with 

minority serving institutions. 

In FY 2010, UCEDDs:

•	 Reached 1.17 million 

people through 

community training 

and technical 

assistance activities

•	 Trained 5,035 

professionals 

FY 2012 appropriations 

provided $38,792,000 to 

support UCEDDs.