SERVED FEBRUARY 24, 2011 ' i KARTMENT OF 

;^VSPOR17\TiON 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION >:. i OPtRATlONS 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 20!i FE5 ?L! P 2- 28 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRISHAN AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-1218 

PROCEDURAL ORDER 

In order to expedite the hearing in this matter, the parties shall comply with the 

Procedural Schedule set forth hereinbelow'. The Rules of Practice for this proceeding 

are set forth in 14 C.F.R. Part 13, Subpart G, of the Federal Aviation Regulations^. 

Those rules provide, inter alia, that the Respondent must file a written Answer or motion 

within thirty (30) days after service of the Complaint (14 C.F.R. § 13.209(a)). that a 

general denial is deemed a failure to file an Answer (§ 13.209(e)), that failure to file an 

Answer without good cause is deemed an admission of each allegation in the Complaint 

(§13.209(f)), and that, absent agreement of the parties, a party seeking an extension of 

time must file a written motion not less than seven (7) days before the document is due, 

absent good cause shown (§ 13.213(a) and (b)). 

More specifically, 14CFR§ 13.209(e) states: 

A person filing an answer shall admit, deny, or state that the person is without 

sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny, each numbered paragraph 

of the complaint. Any statement or allegation contained in the complaint that is 

not specifically denied in the answer may be deemed an admission of the truth of 

that allegation. A general denial of the complaint is deemed a failure to file an 

answer. 

' Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://www. regulations, gov. 

^ The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc400/civil_perialty/; see 

also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gOv/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab_02. tpl. In 

addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

information, see the Web site. 

1 
Under FAA Order 2150.3B and the Rifes governing these proceedings, the 

Agency attorney and the Respondent are encdttrajged to consider the possibility of 

settlement and compromise of this matter.^ (D&EB^ffmise may be effected with or 

without a finding of violation (14 C.F.R. §13.16 (n) (D). 

NOTE: This presiding Judge does not require "Discovery" to be served on the 

Judge. Other Judges have different policies, but as long as this case is assigned to the 

undersigned presiding Judge the parttes tEay/feittJtfeiibt required, serve discovery on the 

undersigned. 

The judge will not discuss the case with any party, or its representative on an ex 

parte basis. If a party has a non-substantive ntott^ to discuss, they should contact the 

judge's attorney-advisor, Mr. Ira Leibowitz at (202) 366-2139 (Ira.Leibowitz@dot.gov). 

Administrative matters may be addressed to tiie|vidge's. Legal Assistant, Pat Matthews 

[202-366-5121] (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov). 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and ai» jfeerctjy ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. Venue shall be Los Angeles, CA. area; 

2. On or before May 1,2011, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but 

not limited to, depositions, docuMrail^fiiroduction, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If th#^aft[es cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the ulida^fned for resolution in a timely 

maimer; 

3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the pttfties shall be prepared to present tiiis case 

at a hearing on or after May 1,2011'', subject to the availability of courtroom 

facilities. 

4. The parties will have the opportunity to Ms Post-Hearing briefs and ai^unents 

pursuant to a schedule to be detonaiald^^ the hiring. For guidance, tJie 

following schedule is typically used.'rComplajnffiiit shall file its brief fi^pen( 15) 

days after receipt of the transcript; J^esp^eilt sMl its brief fifteen {|5) days 

thereafter; and any rebuttal brief by the Complainant shall be filed seven (7) 

days thereafter. 

5. Settled cases will not be removed from the hearing docket imtil the proper 

written pleading(s), consistent with tife applicable rules,^ is received by the 

presiding judge.^ 

' See Linda Joyce Goodman. FAA Docket No. CP89^[)06l, Order dated May 30,1989. 

* 14 C.F.R. § 13.221 states: "The administrative Umll^i^ sfaidl j^ve each party at least 60 dg^rs notice of 

the date, time and location of the hearing." -

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: At any time b«fore or du^|lgft;^arii}gi an agency attorney may Wi^draw a 

complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent of the adminisitnttive law 

2 
The parties are advised that submissions sent to the street address of the U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, may be delayed due to 

screening conducted by the U.S. Postal Service and/or other security agencies 

and may take up to four (4) weeks to be delivered. Additionally, submissions 

may be "irradiated", which affects the quality of submissions. The parties are 

encouraged, but not required, to file submissions by private delivery service, 

facsimile, or email. The certificate of service shall reflect the manner of service. 

Lichard C. Goodwin^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice. 

^ See: In the Matter of Lewis Drake & Associates. FAA Docket No. CP03SO0045, DMS. No. FAA-2003-

16379, "Order Terminating Proceeding", served February 26, 2005; citing Kerry James Eldridge. FAA 

Docket CP89GL0458, "Order Canceling Hearing and Terminating Proceeding", served January 16, 1991, 

at 1; In The Matter of Robert Harris FAA Docket No. CP03EA0001. DMS No. FAA-2002-14236., Orders 

dated October 18, 2004 and October 27, 2004. USAIR. Inc.. FAA Docket CP90NE0359. Trans World 

Airlines. Inc.. FAA Dockets CP90GL0085. CP90CE0110. CP90CE0114. CP90CE0134. Order of 

Administrative Law Judge Burton S. Kolko, served April 8, 1992, p. 2. See "Order Dismissing 

Complainant's Appeal". In The Matter of Robert Harris. FAA Docket No. CP03EA0001. DMS No. FAA2005-14, August 15,2005. 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL^ ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000^ 

ONE COPY 

Louis S. Franecke, Respondent's Counsel 

Franecke Law Group 

1115 Irwin Street, Suite 100 

San Rafael, C A 94901 

TEL: 415-457-7040 

FAX: 415-457-7041 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.