Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices 50757 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the response 

submitted by Nation Ford Chemical Co. to be 

individually adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: July 14, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On July 5, 2011, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (76 

FR 18248, April 1, 2011) of the subject 

five-year reviews was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report. A staff report containing 

information concerning the subject 

matter of the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on August 26, 

2011, and made available to persons on 

the Administrative Protective Order 

service list for these reviews. A public 

version will be issued thereafter, 

pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions. As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determinations 

the Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

August 31, 2011 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

reviews nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the reviews by 

August 31, 2011. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its reviews, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II (C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination. The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the reviews period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Issued: August 11, 2011. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20790 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of a Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Water Act 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

10, 2011 a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States and the State of West 

Virginia v. City of Elkins, Civil Action 

No. 2:11cv61, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of West Virginia. In 

this action the United States and the 

State seeks civil penalties and 

injunctive relief for violations of the 

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 

in connection with the City of Elkins’ 

operation of its municipal wastewater 

and sewer system. 

Under the proposed Consent Decree, 

Elkins is required to: (1) Implement 

injunctive measures through a long term 

control plan (‘‘LTCP’’) to eliminate dry 

weather overflows (‘‘DWOs’’) and 

reduce combined sewer overflows 

(‘‘CSOs’’) by March 2023 by completing 

sewer separation projects and upgrades 

at an approximate cost of $4.2 million; 

(2) pay the United States a civil penalty 

of $32,400; (3) pay the State a civil 

penalty of $32,400 and (3) establish and 

operate a yard waste pick-up and 

recycling program for Elkins’ residents 

as a Supplemental Environmental 

Project (‘‘SEP’’). 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States and West Virginia Department of 

Environmental Protection v. City of 

Elkins, D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–09043. The 

proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney, Northern District of 

West Virginia, Elkins Branch, Federal 

Building, 300 Third Street, Suite 300, 

Elkins, WV and at the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 3, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed Consent Decree may also 

be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site, to 

http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed consent decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
50758 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 158 / Tuesday, August 16, 2011 / Notices 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$17.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if 

by email or fax, forward a check in that 

amount to the Consent Decree Library at 

the stated address. 

Robert Brook, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20755 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Settlement 

Agreement Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act and 

Chapter 11 of the United States 

Bankruptcy Code 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

11, 2011, a proposed Settlement 

Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) in In re 

Barzel Industries Inc. et al., Case No. 

09–13204 (CSS), was lodged with the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

District of Delaware. The Agreement 

was entered into by the United States, 

on behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’) and Barzel Industries Inc. and 

certain of its affiliates (the ‘‘Debtors’’). 

The Agreement relates to the liability of 

American Steel and Aluminum 

Corporation, one of the Debtors, under 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. 

(‘‘CERCLA’’), at the Peterson/Puritan 

Superfund Site, Second Operable Unit, 

located in Lincoln and Cumberland, 

Rhode Island (the ‘‘Site’’). 

The Agreement provides that EPA 

will have an allowed Class IV General 

Unsecured Claim under the Debtors’ 

Plan of Liquidation in the amount of 

$260,828 (‘‘EPA Allowed Claim’’). The 

Agreement also provides that the United 

States may effect a setoff of the EPA 

Allowed Claim against a federal income 

tax refund requested by the Debtors 

with respect to the amount of such 

refund allocable to ASA. The Agreement 

also provides that if insurance proceeds 

are recovered by the Debtors on account 

of the EPA Allowed Claim, the Debtors 

shall pay the amount of such proceeds 

to EPA on a dollar-for-dollar basis. 

Under the Agreement, EPA has agreed 

not to bring a civil action or take 

administrative action against the 

Debtors pursuant to Sections 106 and 

107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607(a), and Section 7003 of the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, relating 

to the Site. 

For a period of 15 days from the date 

of this publication, the Department of 

Justice will receive comments relating to 

the Agreement. To be considered, 

comments must be received by the 

Department of Justice by the date that is 

15 days from the date of this 

publication. Comments should be 

addressed to the Section Chief of the 

Environmental Enforcement Section, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044, and should refer to In re Barzel 

Industries Inc. et al., Case No. 09–13204 

(CSS), D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–1233/7. A 

copy of the comments should be sent to 

Donald G. Frankel, Senior Counsel, 

Department of Justice, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, One Gateway 

Center, Suite 616, Newton, MA 02458 or 

e-mailed to donald.frankel@usdoj.gov. 

The Agreement may be examined at 

the Office of the United States Attorney, 

District of Delaware, 1201 Market Street, 

Suite 1100, Wilmington, Delaware 

(contact Ellen Slights at 302–573–6277). 

During the public comment period, the 

Agreement may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Agreement may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy of the Agreement from 

the Consent Decree Library, please 

enclose a check in the amount of $3.50 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost) 

payable to the U.S. Treasury (if the 

request is by fax or e-mail, forward a 

check to the Consent Decree library at 

the address stated above). Commenters 

may request an opportunity for a public 

meeting, in accordance with Section 

7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6973(d). 

Ronald G. Gluck, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20779 Filed 8–15–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0317] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested— 

Reinstatement, With Change, of a 

Previously Approved Collection for 

Which Approval Has Expired, Identity 

Theft Supplement (ITS) to the National 

Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of 

Justice Statistics will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. Comments are 

encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until October 17, 2011. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Lynn Langton, 

Statistician, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

Office of Justice Programs, Department 

of Justice, 810 7th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20531, or facsimile 

(202) 307–1463. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES