alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment #1 to the Collaboration and Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.8.1 
 Amendment # 1 to the Collaboration and Option Agreement 

This is an Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Collaboration and Option Agreement dated May 14th 2009 (the “Agreement) by and between Celgene Corporation, a
Delaware corporation having a place of business at 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, New Jersey 07901 (“Celgene”), and GlobeImmune, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a place of business at 1450 Infinite Drive, Louisville, Colorado 80027
(“GlobeImmune”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Agreement sets forth certain rights and obligations of the Parties relating to a certain collaboration, research and development activities for certain drug candidates and future drug
programs; 
 WHEREAS, GlobeImmune and Celgene desire to amend the Agreement, pursuant to Section 13.5, Waivers and
Modifications, to allow for additional time to negotiate and enter into the Supply Agreement, as further described below. 

AGREEMENT 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein the Parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree to
amend the Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	All terms defined in the Agreement shall have a meaning in this Amendment as in the Agreement, unless otherwise expressly defined in this Amendment.


  

	 	2.	Section 4.8, Manufacture and Supply, is amended to delete the following language in the second sentence: 


“one hundred and eighty (180) days” 
 and replace such language with the following: 
 “two hundred and seventy
(270) days” 
 Except as otherwise amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as presently
written, and the rights, duties, liabilities and obligations of the Parties thereto, as presently constituted, will continue in full effect. 
 This Amendment, together with the Agreement, constitute the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained therein, and together, supersede and replace any and all prior
and contemporaneous understandings, arrangements and agreements, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives, effective this 6th day of November 2009. 
  

									
	CELGENE CORPORATION	 		 	GLOBEIMMUNE, INC.
					
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Robert J. Hugin
	 		 	Signature:	 	 /s/ Jeff Rong

					
	Print Name:	 	 Robert J. Hugin
	 		 	Print Name:	 	 Jeff Rong

					
	Title:	 	 President and COO
	 		 	Title:	 	 CBO



									
					
	Approved for Legal Content:
#### § 788.5 Reliance on official interpretations.

Under section 10 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 259), official interpretation issued under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 may, under certain circumstances, be controlling in determining the rights and liabilities of employers and employees. The interpretations of the law contained in this part are official interpretations on which reliance may be placed as provided in section l0 of the Portal-to-Portal Act so long as they remain effective and are not modified, rescinded, or determined by judicial authority to be incorrect. However, the failure to discuss a particular problem in this part or in the interpretations supplementing it should not be taken to indicate the adoption of any position by the Secretary of Labor or the Administrator with respect to such problem or to constitute an administrative interpretation or practice or enforcement policy.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Eastgate Acquisitions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anna Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ANNAGLUSKIN Anna Gluskin Chief Executive Officer September 25, 2013    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
Connect, Create, 

and Contribute 

this MAY for Older 

Americans Month. 

Let’s celebrate 

healthy aging 

and the diversity of 

our community.

acl.gov/oam
## Casie Walker

Burnet County District Clerk

1701 East Polk Street, Suite 90

Burnet, Texas 78611

- 2757

Phone (512) 756

- 5450

November 20, 2015

Third Court of Appeals

via email

Re: Court of Appeals Number:

Trail Court Number: 41725

Style: The State of Texas

v.

KEVIN TOD D HARDIN

Per TRAP 51.2(a)(1), this letter is to inform you we received the mandate in the above

referenced case on November 05, 2015

.

Sincerely,

Casie Walker

District Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [Intentionally omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: February 8, 2005                                                               /s/ Warren D. Edwards   Warren D. Edwards,   Executive Vice President
§ 553.1 Definitions. ( a ) Act or FLSA means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 1060, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 201-219).
( b ) *1985 Amendments* means the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1985 (Pub. L. 99-150).
( c ) *Public agency* means a State, a political subdivision of a State or an interstate governmental agency.
( d ) *State* means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or any other Territory or possession of the United States (29 U.S.C. 203(c) and 213(f)).
#### ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO. *v.*DAVIS.

.No error of law was complained of. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Dade superior court. December 15, 1905.

The plaintiff, by his next friend, brought suit against the railway company, alleging that he was an infant, ten years of age, and was a passenger upon the train of defendant, and that when he arrived at his destination an employee of the defendant, who was standing at the steps of the car from which he was alighting, caught him roughly and caused him to strike his knee against some ■portion of the car or steps, and, as a result, his knee was bruised, .strained, and dislocated, from which .he has suffered great pain, and continues to suffer. The defendant, in its answer, denied all the material allegations of the petition. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $1200. The defendant filed a motion for a new trial upon the general grounds, and also upon the ground that the verdict was excessive. The motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

*J. P. Jacoway,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. J. & J. McCamy*and *B. T. Brock,*contra.

Cobb, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The evidence ■of the plaintiff amply authorized a finding that he was roughly handled by the employee of the railroad company who assisted him *90from the train, and that, as a result of this treatment, his knee was injured by being struck against some part of the car. The evidence for the defendant was in direct conflict with this evidence, the employee, who it is claimed inflicted the injury, denying that he assisted the plaintiff or touched him in any way when he was alighting from the car. All this evidence presented questions for the jury, and their finding in the matter, having met with the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed by this court.

There was some evidence that the knee was dislocated, but there was a conflict on this point. It was shown, by the testimony of the plaintiff and his mother and father, that he had never entirely recovered from the injury to his knee, and that he still suffered pain. The trial took place a year or more after the injury is alleged to have occurred. It can not be said that the evidence authorized a finding that the injury was permanent, but there was some evidence that pain or inconvenience resulting from the injury might continue for some time. While the verdict is full, we are not authorized to say, as a matter of law,- that it was so excessive as to justify the conclusion that the jury were animated by prejudice or bias. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.331 Snake Creek.

The draw of the Snake Creek Bridge, at Islamorada, Florida, will open on signal, except that from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., the draw need open only on the hour.

[USCG-2015-0046, 81 FR 28728, May 10, 2016]
AIDD Protection and Advocacy (PADD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2017 Annual Allocation

State/Territory

AIDD Protection 

and Advocacy 

(PADD)

Alabama $581,326

Alaska $384,693

Arizona $693,630

Arkansas $393,051

California $3,368,311

Colorado $463,243

Connecticut $387,054

Delaware $384,693

District of Columbia $384,693

Florida $1,954,664

Georgia $1,054,137

Hawaii $384,693

Idaho $384,693

Illinois $1,226,808

Indiana $713,146

Iowa $384,693

Kansas $384,693

Kentucky $535,195

Louisiana $537,239

Maine $384,693

Maryland $487,463

Massachusetts $602,938

Michigan $1,121,176

Minnesota $502,368

Mississippi $409,051

Missouri $643,191

Montana $384,693

Nebraska $384,693

Nevada $384,693

New Hampshire $384,693

New Jersey $758,684

New Mexico $384,693

New York $1,801,964

North Carolina $1,062,747

North Dakota $384,693

Ohio $1,236,193

Oklahoma $395,264

Oregon $409,773

Pennsylvania $1,292,853

Rhode Island $384,693

South Carolina $550,926

South Dakota $384,693

Tennessee $705,805

Texas $2,463,437

Utah $384,693

Vermont $384,693

Virginia $728,405

Washington $640,525

West Virginia $384,693

Wisconsin $596,587

Wyoming $384,693

American Samoa $205,808

Guam $205,808

Northern Mariana Islands $205,808

Puerto Rico $805,132

Virgin Islands $205,808

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $205,808

TOTAL $37,845,186

6/7/2017
Martin, Michael (OST) _ 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:30 AM 

_Scott Wardwell (swardwell@presqueisleme.us); kreigc@co.clinton.ny.us 

Brad Madeira (manager@bhbairport.com); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Michael E. Zurlo 

(zurlom@co.clinton.ny.us); Jim A. Bennett Qbennett@ presqueisleme.us); 'Rizzi, Patrick R. 

(patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com)' (patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com) 

Essential Air Service at Presque Isle and Plattsburgh 

PenAir Proposal for PQI and PBG - March 2014.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Presque Isle, Maine, and Plattsburgh, New York, 

and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant 

Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued Order 2014-1-21 (January 31, 2014), requesting proposals 

from airlines interested in providing EAS for a new term. In response to our request, PenAir, the incumbent, was the 

only airline to submit a proposal. 

I have attached PenAir's proposal for your review and I expect it to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this 

afternoon. I request that you review the proposal and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no 

later than Wednesday, April 2. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, 

please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on this e-mail. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
§ 110.55b Connecticut River, Old Saybrook, Connecticut. ( a ) *Special anchorage area A.* All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 41°19′54.75′′ N., longitude 072°21′08.40′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′21.50′′ N., longitude 072°20′49.65′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′17.80′′ N., longitude 072°20′49.25′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′17.05′′ N., longitude 72°20′59′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′25.40′′ N., longitude 72°21′00.95′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′29.50′′ N., longitude 72°21′17.60′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′35.40′′ N., longitude 72°21′22.90′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°19′52.35′′ N., longitude 72°21′26.10′′ W.; thence to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Special anchorage area B.* All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 41°17′26′′ N., longitude 072°21′04′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′24.60′′ N., longitude 072°21′16′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′20′′ N., longitude 072°21′09′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′16′′ N., longitude 072°21′05′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′16′′ N., longitude 072°21′03′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′21.5′′ N., longitude 072°21′04.5′′ W.; thence to the point of beginning.
( c ) *Special anchorage area C.* All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 41°17′27′′ N., longitude 072°21′35′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′24′′ N., longitude 072°22′01′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′16′′ N., longitude 072°22′00′′ W.; thence to latitude 41°17′19′′ N., longitude 072°21′33′′ W.; thence to the point of beginning.
[USCG-2012-0806, 81 FR 12823, Mar. 11, 2016, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16188, Mar. 16, 2023]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2562-000]

Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Tampa Electric Company (Tampa Electric) tendered for filing service agreements with Cargill-Alliant, LLC (Cargill-Alliant) for firm and non-firm point-to-point transmission service under Tampa Electric's open access transmission tariff.

Tampa Electric proposes an effective date of May 19, 2000, for the tendered service agreements, and therefore requests waiver of the Commission's notice requirement.

Copies of the filing have been served on Cargill-Alliant and the Florida Public Service Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14141  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.641 What are the structural fire protection requirements for accommodation spaces and modules? ( a ) Accommodation spaces and modules must be designed, located, and constructed so as to minimize the effects of flame, excess heat, or blast effects caused by fires and explosions; and to provide safe refuge from fires and explosions for personnel for the minimum time needed to evacuate the space.
( b ) The requirement in paragraph (a) of this section may be met by complying with 46 CFR 108.131 through 108.147, provided that: ( 1 ) The exterior boundaries of superstructures and deckhouses enclosing these spaces and modules, including any overhanging deck that supports these spaces and modules, are constructed to the A-60 standard defined in 46 CFR 108.131(b)(2) for any portion that faces and is within 100 feet of the hydrocarbon source; and
( 2 ) The ventilation system has both a means of shutting down the system and an alarm at a manned location that sounds when any hazardous or toxic substance enters the system.
( c ) As an alternative to paragraph (b) of this section, the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section may be met by complying with a national consensus standard, as that term is defined in 29 CFR 1910.2, for the structural fire protection of accommodation spaces and modules, and that complies with the standards set by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, as that term is defined by 29 CFR 1910.7, for such protection, provided that: ( 1 ) All such spaces and modules on deepwater manned ports are provided with automatic fire detection and alarm systems. The alarm system must signal a normally manned area both visually and audibly, and be divided into zones to limit the area covered by a particular alarm signal;
( 2 ) Sleeping quarters are fitted with smoke detectors that have local alarms that may or may not be connected with the central alarm panel; and
( 3 ) Independent fire walls are constructed and installed so as to be of size and orientation sufficient to protect the exterior surfaces of the spaces or modules from extreme radiant heat flux levels, and provide the A-60 standard defined in 46 CFR 108.131(b)(2).
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39180, July 1, 2013]
**Exhibit 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with thefiling by Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934.  And

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Barry M. Portnoy |   | /s/ David J. Hegarty                  |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Barry M. Portnoy     |   | David J. Hegarty                      |
| Managing Trustee     |   | President and Chief Operating Officer |
|                 |   |                                  |
|                 |   |                                  |
| /s/ Gerard M. Martin |   | /s/ John R. Hoadley                   |
| Gerard M. Martin     |   | John R. Hoadley                       |
| Managing Trustee     |   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.947 Obion River.

The draws of all bridges on the Obion River need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
§ 151.3000 Definition of marine debris for the purposes of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act. ( a ) *Marine debris.* For the purposes of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act (33 U.S.C. 1951-1958 (2006)) only, marine debris is defined as any persistent solid material that is manufactured or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment or the Great Lakes.
( b ) NOAA and the Coast Guard have jointly promulgated the definition of marine debris in this part. NOAA's regulation may be found in 15 CFR part 909.
[74 FR 45560, Sept. 3, 2009]