alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ToC

# Numbers & %s Fac-Beds by State

&"Arial,Bold"&14Table A-6: LTC Facilities and Beds Numbers and Percents for FY 2012	

Table A-6: p. &P	

# Numbers Facil, Beds by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-6: LTC Facilities and Beds Numbers and Percents for FY 2012	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-6: p. &P	

# Percents Facil, Beds by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-6: LTC Facilities and Beds Numbers and Percents for FY 2012	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-6: p. &P	

# Numbers & %s Fac-Beds by Region

&"Arial,Bold"&14Table A-6: LTC Facilities and Beds Numbers and Percents by Region for FY 2012	

Table A-6: p. &P	

# Numbers Facil, Beds by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-6: LTC Facilities and Beds Numbers and Percents by Region for FY 2012	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-6: p. &P	

# Percents Facil, Beds by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-6: LTC Facilities and Beds Numbers and Percents by Region for FY 2012	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-6: p. &P
National City
Mortgage

National City Mortgage Co.
3232 Newmark Drive *  Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Telephone (937) 910-1200

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1820
Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820


Management's Assertion on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards
Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Management

We,  as  members  of  management  of  National  City  Mortgage  Co.  (NCM),  are
responsible for complying with the minimum  servicing  standards as set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP).  We are also  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards.  We
have  performed an evaluation  of NCM's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1999 and for the year then
ended.  Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended December
31, 1999, NCM complied,  in all material  respects,  with the minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same  period,  NCM had in effect a  fidelity  bond and errors
policy in the amount of $60 million and an omissions policy in the amount of $40
million.

T. Jackson Case, Jr., Executive Vice President

February 3, 2000
PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.

2015.5.22 

Overview: 

1. All-in-One Firmware version updated to:v1.1.9

Major Updates: 

1. Fixed issue of some aircraft unable to determine their altitudes. 

2. Fixed issue of the DJI Pilot app unable to obtain and display battery error history. 

3. Fixed issue of the compass calibration progress not being displayed properly.

Notice: 

 Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.9, otherwise future firmware will not be able 

to install. 

 Users may skip updating the remote controller if they have already updated the firmware to v1.1.8, as 

the latest firmware update does not affect the remote controller. 

 
PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.

2015.5.8 

Overview: 

2. All-in-One Firmware version updated to:v1.1.8

Major Updates: 

4. Fixed the issue of failure to update the firmware if the remote controller is turned off.

Notice: 

 Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.8, otherwise future firmware will not be able 

to install. 

 Re-link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware update. 

 

 
PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.

2015.5.6 

Overview: 

3. All-in-One Firmware version updated to:v1.1.6

4. DJI Pilot app iOS version updated to: v1.1.1

5. DJI Pilot app Android version updated to: v1.1.0

Major Updates: 

Updated to be compatible with the iOS version of the DJI Pilot app.

Notice: 

Re-link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware upgrade.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.224 Thames River. The draw of the Amtrak Bridge, mile 3.0, at New London, shall operate as follows: ( a ) The draw shall open on signal to 75 feet above mean high water for all vessel traffic unless a full bridge opening to 135.3 feet above mean high water is requested.
( b ) The 75 foot opening will be signified by a range light display with one solid green light and one flashing green light and the full 135.3 foot opening will be signified with two solid green range lights.
( c ) The draw shall open on signal for public vessels of the United States and commercial vessels; except that, when a train scheduled to cross the bridge without stopping has passed the Midway, Groton, or New London stations and is in motion toward the bridge, the lift span shall not be opened until the train has crossed the bridge.
( d ) The draw shall open on signal as soon as practicable for all other vessel traffic but no later than 20 minutes after the signal to open is given.
[USCG-2013-0983, 80 FR 4, Jan. 2, 2015]
ACL Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology (PAAT) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2020 Final Allocation

8/6/2020

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy for 

Assistive 

Technology (PAAT)

Alabama $58,365

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $85,636

Arkansas $50,000

California $472,346

Colorado $68,010

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $254,332

Georgia $125,611

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $152,139

Indiana $79,907

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $53,356

Louisiana $55,644

Maine $50,000

Maryland $72,155

Massachusetts $82,417

Michigan $119,360

Minnesota $67,002

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $73,155

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $106,375

New Mexico $50,000

New York $233,350

North Carolina $123,989

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $139,582

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,041

Pennsylvania $152,927

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $60,709

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $80,840

Texas $342,724

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $101,708

Washington $89,981

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $69,419

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $30,000

Guam $30,000

Northern Mariana Islands $30,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $30,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $30,000

TOTAL $4,771,080
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.168 Crew member: Main deck watch.

During COW operations, the master shall ensure that at least one member of the crew with a designated responsibility for monitoring COW operations is on the main deck at all times.
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX) 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

October 16, 2014

Hon. James Gibson

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

401 W. Belknap

Fort Worth, TX 76196

- 0201

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Don Davidson

Attorney at Law

Forest Ridge Business Park, Ste 803

803 Forest Ridge Drive

Bedford, TX 76022

- 7258

* DELIVERE D VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Charles M. Mallin

Chief, Appellate Section

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap Street

Fort Worth, TX 76196

- 0201

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 12

- 00671

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 1264079D

Style: ROGER ALAN SCOTT v. THE STAT E OF TEXAS

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date

.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

cc: State Prosecuting Attorney (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

432 nd District Court (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Thomas A. Wilder , Tarrant County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Jeff Walker , Presiding Judge, Eighth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57980-57981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23884]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the membership of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Senior Executive Service (SES) 
Performance Review Board (PRB).

DATES: Effective Date: September 19, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments concerning this notice to: Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, 
Washington, DC 20004-2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Biscieglia by telephone at 
(202) 694-7041 or by e-mail at debbieb@dnfsb.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) through (5) requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more

[[Page 57981]]

performance review boards. The PRB shall review and evaluate the 
initial summary rating of the senior executive's performance, the 
executive's response, and the higher level official's comments on the 
initial summary rating. In addition, the PRB will review and recommend 
executive performance bonuses and pay increases.
    The DNFSB is a small, independent Federal agency; therefore, the 
members of the DNFSB SES Performance Review Board listed in this notice 
are drawn from the SES ranks of other agencies. The following persons 
comprise a standing roster to serve as members of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board SES Performance Review Board:

Christopher E. Aiello, Director of Human Resources, Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation
David M. Capozzi, Director of Technical and Information Services, 
United States Access Board
Edward C. Hobson, Associate Director for Safety and Security, Peace 
Corps
Steven G. McManus, Deputy Chief Operating Officer, Armed Forces 
Retirement Home
Barry S. Socks, Chief Operating Officer, National Capital Planning 
Commission
Christopher W. Warner, General Counsel, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard 
Investigation Board

    Dated: September 12, 2011.
Brian Grosner,
Chairman, Executive Resources Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-23884 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Matthew J. Espe, Chief Executive Officer of
IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: July 8, 2005



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ MATTHEW J. ESPE                 
|Matthew J. Espe                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,907
<PP&E>                                          13,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           510
<OTHER-SE>                                         517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,991
<SALES>                                          3,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,643
<CGS>                                            2,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (19)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14081]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 11685-001]

The Stockport Mill County Inn; Notice Rescinding Prior Notice 
(May 23, 2000); Notice of Application Ready for Environmental Analysis 
and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and 
Prescriptions

May 31, 2000.
    On May 23, 2000, a notice of application ready for environmental 
analysis and soliciting comments, recommendations, terms and 
conditions, and prescriptions was issued for the Stockport Mill Country 
Inn Water Power Project No. 11685. On April 11, 2000, a notice of 
application ready for environmental analysis and soliciting comments, 
recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions was also 
issued for the Stockport Mill Country Inn Water Power Project. Since 
two identical notices were issued for the same project and applicant, 
the notice issued on May 23, 2000 (65 FR 34462, published May 30, 
2000), is rescinded.
    The deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and 
conditions, and prescriptions is June 12, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14081 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6827 

DANIEL LEE BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-716-3)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 22, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Lee Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider a previous

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone,

369 F.3d 363 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding the certificate of

appealability standard applies to denials of motions under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 60(b)). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record

and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

          CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                               15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
                 78o(d) (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT)
                                  CERTIFICATION

           I, Levi Mochkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Avenue Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Avenue Group,
Inc. as of, and for the periods presented in this report.

4. Avenue Group, Inc.'s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for Avenue Group, Inc. and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to Avenue Group, Inc., including
   its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within the entity,
   particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of Avenue Group, Inc.'s disclosure controls
   and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any changes in Avenue Group Inc.'s internal
   control over financial reporting that occurred during Avenue Group Inc.'s
   fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
   to materially affect, Avenue Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial
   reporting: and

5. Avenue Group, Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Avenue Group, Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Avenue Group, Inc.'s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect Avenue Group, Inc.'s ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in Avenue Group, Inc.'s internal
   control over financial reporting.

           Mary 20, 2005



           /s/ Levi Mochkin
           -------------------------------------
           Levi Mochkin
           Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 780.119 Employment in the specified operations generally.

Employees are employed in the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals or poultry only if their operations relate to animals of the type named and constitute the “raising” of such animals. If these two requirements are met, it makes no difference for what purpose the animals are raised or where the operations are performed. For example, the fact that cattle are raised to obtain serum or virus or that chicks are hatched in a commercial hatchery does not affect the status of the operations under section 3(f).
§ 127.1307 Emergency Manual. ( a ) Each Emergency Manual must contain— ( 1 ) For each LHG handled— ( i ) A physical description of the LHG;
( ii ) A description of the hazards of the LHG;
( iii ) First-aid procedures for persons exposed to the LHG or its vapors;
( iv ) The procedures for response to a release of the LHG; and,
( v ) If the LHG is flammable, the procedures for fighting a fire involving the LHG or its vapors;
( 2 ) A description of the emergency shutdown required by § 127.1205;
( 3 ) The procedures for emergency shutdown;
( 4 ) A description of the number, kind, place, and use of the fire equipment required by § 127.1501(a) and of the portable fire extinguishers required by § 127.1503;
( 5 ) The telephone numbers of local Coast Guard units, hospitals, fire departments, police departments, and other emergency-response organizations;
( 6 ) If the facility has personnel shelters, the place of and provisions in each shelter;
( 7 ) If the facility has first-aid stations, the location of each station;
( 8 ) Emergency procedures for mooring and unmooring a vessel; and,
( 9 ) If an off-site organization is to furnish emergency response, a copy of the written agreement required by § 127.1505(a)(2).
( b ) The employee-emergency plan and fire-prevention plan required by OSHA in 29 CFR 1910.38 may be used to comply with this section to the extent that they address the requirements specified in paragraphs (a) (1) through (9) of this section.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39799, Aug. 3, 1995; 60 FR 49509, Sept. 26, 1995]