Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2011 / Notices 52349 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Dockets Services, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–1802. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2011). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

August 12, 2011, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain light-emitting 

diodes and products containing same 

that infringe one or more of claims 1, 3, 

5–10, and 13–16 of the ‘848 patent; 

claims 1–9 of the ‘372 patent; claims 1 

and 5–9 of the ‘741 patent; claims 1, 2, 

4, 6–8, 10, and 11 of the ‘081 patent; 

claims 1, 4, 5, and 7–14 of the ‘443 

patent; claims 1–4, 6, and 9–13 of the 

‘312 patent; claims 1–5 of the ‘315 

patent; and claims 1–12 of the ‘881 

patent, and whether an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Samsung LED Co., Ltd., 314, Maetan 3- 

Dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon City, 

Gyeonggi-Do 443–743, Korea. 

Samsung LED America, Inc., 6 

Concourse Parkway NE., Atlanta, GA 

30328. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

OSRAM GmbH, Hellabrunner Strasse 1, 

81543 Munich, Germany. 

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, 

Leibnizstr 4, 93055 Regensburg, 

Germany. 

OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., 

1150 Kifer Road Suite 100, 

Sunnyvale, CA 94086. 

OSRAM Sylvania Inc., 100 Endicott 

Street, Danvers, MA 01923. 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not participate as a 

party in this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 16, 2011. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21308 Filed 8–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Hearings of the Judicial Conference 

Advisory Committees on Rules of 

Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, and 

Criminal Procedure and the Federal 

Rules of Evidence 

AGENCY: Advisory Committees on Rules 

of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, and 

Criminal Procedure, and the Federal 

Rules of Evidence, Judicial Conference 

of the United States. 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed 

Amendments and Open Hearings. 

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committees on 

Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, 

and Criminal Procedure, and Rules of 

Evidence have proposed amendments to 

the following rules: 

Appellate Rules: 13, 14, 24, 28, and 

28.1, and Form 4; 

Bankruptcy Rules: 1007, 3007, 5009, 

9006, 9013, and 9014, and Official 

Forms 6C, 7, 22A, and 22C. 

Civil Rules: 37 and 45. 

Criminal Rules: 11, 12, and 34. 

Evidence Rule: 803. 

The text of the proposed amendments 

and the accompanying committee notes 

can be found on the United States 

Federal courts’ rulemaking Web site at 

http://www.uscourts.gov/ 

RulesAndPolicies/FederalRulemaking/ 

Overview.aspx. 

The Judicial Conference Committee 

on Rules of Practice and Procedure 

submits these proposed amendments for 

public comment. All written comments 

and suggestions with respect to the 

proposed amendments must be received 

by the Secretary no later than February 

15, 2012. They can be sent to any of the 

following: by mail to Peter G. McCabe, 

Secretary, Committee on Rules of 

Practice and Procedure of the Judicial 

Conference of the United States, 

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary 

Building, Washington, DC 20544; by 

electronic mail to 

<Rules_Comments@ao.uscourts.gov>; or 

by facsimile to Peter G. McCabe at (202) 

502–1766. In accordance with 

established procedures, all comments 

submitted are available for public 

inspection. 

Public hearings are scheduled to be 

held on the amendments to: 

• Appellate Rules in Columbus, Ohio, 

on January 31, 2012, and in Washington, 

DC, on February 3, 2012; 

• Bankruptcy Rules in Washington, 

DC, on January 13, 2012, and in 

Chicago, Illinois, on February 10, 2012; 

• Civil Rules in Washington, DC, on 

November 7, 2011, in Phoenix, Arizona, 

on January 4, 2012, and in Chicago, 

Illinois, on January 27, 2012; 

• Criminal Rules in Phoenix, Arizona, 

on January 6, 2012, and in Washington, 

DC, on February 6, 2012; and 

• Evidence Rules in Phoenix, 

Arizona, on January 7, 2012, and in 

Washington, DC, on January 17, 2012. 

Those wishing to testify should 

contact the Committee Secretary at the 

above address in writing at least 30 days 

before the hearing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter G. McCabe, Secretary, Committee 

on Rules of Practice and Procedure of 

the Judicial Conference of the United 

States, Thurgood Marshall Federal 

Judiciary Building, Washington, DC 

20544, Telephone (202) 502–1820. 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
52350 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 162 / Monday, August 22, 2011 / Notices 

Dated: August 16, 2011. 

Peter G. McCabe, 

Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice 

and Procedure. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21332 Filed 8–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210–55–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

15, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States and State of Montana v. 

Soco West, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:11– 

cv–00088, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the District of 

Montana. 

In this settlement, Soco West, Inc. 

(‘‘Soco’’) has agreed to perform the 

remedial action at Operable Unit 2 of 

the Lockwood Solvent Groundwater 

Plume Superfund Site (the ‘‘Site’’) in 

Billings, Yellowstone County, Montana, 

as well as certain Site-wide remedial 

obligations. The Consent Decree also 

requires Soco to pay $750,000 for past 

costs of removal and remedial action 

incurred by the United States in 

connection with the release or 

threatened release of hazardous 

substances at the Site, and the United 

States and Montana’s future costs 

related to overseeing Soco’s remedial 

action as well. The settlement resolves 

the United States and Montana’s claims 

against Soco under Section 107(a) of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), and 

the United States’ claims under Section 

106 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606, and 

Section 7003 of the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 

U.S.C. 6973. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States and the State of Montana v. Soco 

West, Inc., D.J. Ref. 90–11–2–08777. 

Commenters may request an 

opportunity for a public hearing in the 

affected area, in accordance with 

Section 7003(d) of RCRA. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree, may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, to http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. If 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library by mail, please enclose 

a check in the amount of $168.25 (25 

cents per page reproduction cost) 

payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if 

requesting by e-mail or fax, forward a 

check in that amount to the Consent 

Decree Library at the address given 

above. 

Robert Brook, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21364 Filed 8–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1564] 

Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence 

Recording System (VDMERS) 

Standard, Certification Program 

Requirements, and Selection and 

Application Guide 

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, 

Justice. 

ACTION: Notice and Request for 

Comments. 

SUMMARY: In an effort to obtain 

comments from interested parties, the 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of 

Justice Programs, National Institute of 

Justice (NIJ) will make available to the 

general public three draft documents 

related to Vehicular Digital Multimedia 

Evidence Recording Systems 

(VDMERSs) used by law enforcement 

agencies: 

1. Draft VDMERS Standard for Law 

Enforcement. 

2. Draft Law Enforcement VDMERS 

Certification Program Requirements. 

3. Draft Law Enforcement VDMERS 

Selection and Application Guide. 

The opportunity to provide comments 

on these documents is open to industry 

technical representatives, law 

enforcement agencies and organizations, 

research, development and scientific 

communities, and all other stakeholders 

and interested parties. Those 

individuals wishing to obtain and 

provide comments on the draft 

documents under consideration are 

directed to the following Web site: 

http://www.justnet.org. 

DATES: The comment period will be 

open until September 21, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Casandra Robinson, by telephone at 

202–305–2596 [Note: this is not a tollfree telephone number], or by e-mail at 

casandra.robinson@usdoj.gov. 

Thomas E. Feucht, 

Executive Senior Science Advisor, National 

Institute of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21347 Filed 8–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0181] 

Coke Oven Emissions Standard; 

Extension of the Office of Management 

and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of 

Information Collection (Paperwork) 

Requirements 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Request for public comments. 

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public 

comments concerning its proposal to 

extend the Office of Management and 

Budget’s (OMB) approval of the 

information collection requirements 

specified in the Standard on Coke Oven 

Emissions (29 CFR 1910.1029). 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

(postmarked, sent, or received) by 

October 21, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: 

Electronically: You may submit 

comments and attachments 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the 

instructions online for submitting 

comments. 

Facsimile: If your comments, 

including attachments, are not longer 

than 10 pages, you may fax them to the 

OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, hand delivery, express mail, 

messenger, or courier service: When 

using this method, you must submit a 

copy of your comments and attachments 

to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. 

OSHA–2011–0181, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration, Room N–2625, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express 


jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES