alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 516 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 516

 Solemnly commemorating the 25th anniversary of the tragic April 1983 
 bombing of the United States Embassy in Beirut and remembering those 
            who lost their lives and those who were injured.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 2008

  Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Feingold, and Mr. 
  Casey) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Solemnly commemorating the 25th anniversary of the tragic April 1983 
 bombing of the United States Embassy in Beirut and remembering those 
            who lost their lives and those who were injured.

Whereas, on April 18, 1983, terrorists detonated a bomb at the United States 
        Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon, killing 63 people, including 42 American and 
        Lebanese Embassy staff;
Whereas the bombing injured many other people, including 35 Embassy staff;
Whereas President Ronald Reagan denounced the ``vicious terrorist bombing'' as a 
        ``cowardly act''; and
Whereas the April 18, 1983 attack was at the time the deadliest attack against a 
        United States diplomatic mission in history, but was followed by other 
        terrorist attacks against Americans in Beirut including the bombing of 
        the United States Marines barracks in Beirut on October 23, 1983, which 
        killed 241 members of the United States Armed Forces, the bombing of the 
        United States Embassy annex in Beirut on September 20, 1984, which 
        killed 12 people, including 9 Embassy staff, and the bombing of a United 
        States Embassy vehicle on January 15, 2008, which injured 2 Lebanese 
        employees of the Embassy and killed 3 Lebanese passers by: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, on the 25th anniversary of the April 18, 
1983, bombing of the United States Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon--
            (1) remembers the victims of the bombing;
            (2) joins family and friends in mourning the American and 
        Lebanese victims who lost their lives in this tragic bombing;
            (3) condemns all terrorist acts that deliberately target 
        the innocent; and
            (4) reiterates its strong support for the people of Lebanon 
        and their Government as they seek to build a better future free 
        from the threat of terrorist violence.
                                 <all>
```
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00473

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141

- 329967

- 21

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### J ERALD 

### H. M ILLER 

### , J R



### . , Appellant

V



### . T ARRANT 

### C OUNTY 

### A PPRAISAL 

### D ISTRICT 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief in this accelerated appeal was originally due April 3, 2023.

The court granted three extensions to this deadline, but appellant’ s brief was never filed. On September 25, 2023, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could

di smiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten day s, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b) , 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Instead of filing a brief and motion as directed, appellant submitted another request for extension of time. Appellant’s request is DENIED. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to expla in the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prose cution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : October 5, 2023
§ 105.140 Alternative Security Program. ( a ) A facility owner or operator may use an Alternative Security Program approved under § 101.120 of this subchapter if: ( 1 ) The Alternative Security Program is appropriate to that facility;
( 2 ) The Alternative Security Program is implemented in its entirety.
( b ) A facility owner or operator using an Alternative Security Program approved under § 101.120 of this subchapter must complete and submit to the cognizant COTP a Facility Vulnerability and Security Measures Summary (Form CG-6025). The form is available at *https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/forms/*.
[USCG-2003-14732, 68 FR 39322, July 1, 2003, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58278, Sept. 18, 2020]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 3, 2013

d0327

Order 

April 3, 2013

145923

JESUBEN ENGELHARDT and LORI

ENGELHARDT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 145923

COA: 292143

Macomb CC: 2007-004652-NM

ST. JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM – DETROIT- MACOMB CAMPUS, d/b/a ST. JOHN

MACOMB HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and

RAJESH C. BHAGAT, M.D. and

RAJESH C. BHAGAT, M.D., P.C.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
f8k061312ex10ii_keyuan.htm


Exhibit 10.2







KEYUAN PETROCHEMICALS, INC.


Qingshi Industrial Park


Ningbo Economic & Technological Development Zone


Ningbo, Zhejiang Province


P.R. China 315803







                  June 13, 2012







Attn: Mr. Michael Rosenberg







Re:           Amendment to Independent Director Agreement







Dear Mr. Rosenberg:







This letter shall act as an amendment to that certain Independent Director Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2011, between Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc. (“Keyuan” or the “Company”) and Mr. Michael Rosenberg (the “Independent Director”), regarding the Company’s engagement of the Independent Director as a non-employee director of the Company (the “Agreement”).







The Company and the Independent Director hereby confirm and agree that the Fees (as the term defined in Schedule A of the Agreement) payable on the last day of each calendar month to the Independent Director shall be $ 2,000, effective July 1, 2012. In the event that the Company goes private, Mr. Rosenberg is entitled to receive additional fee of $2,000, payable upon the closing of the transaction of going private. In the event that the Company is uplisted to a higher exchange in the U.S. capital market, the Company and the Independent Director shall renegotiate to increase the Fees. Other than as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This amendment to the Agreement shall be effective as of the date first above written.







Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a signed copy to the Company.  Thank you.


 



	 	

Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 
	 	

KEYUAN PETROCHEMICALS, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Chunfeng Tao  	 
	 	Name:	Chunfeng Tao	 
	 	Title :	Chairman, President & CEO	 



 


Accepted as of the date


first above written:


 




	
By: 

	/s/ Michael Rosenberg 	 
	Name: 	Michael Rosenberg	 











1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 33-32841, No. 33-13130 and No.
333-22555) pertaining to the MLX Corp. Stock Option Plan and the
MLX Corp. Stock Option and Incentive Award Plan and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated February 28, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of MLX Corp.
included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.




                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP



March 20, 1997
Atlanta, Georgia
Exhibit 32.2

VANTAGEMED CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VantageMed Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip D. Ranger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/ Philip D. RangerPhilip D. Ranger
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2004 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
##### 



Certifications Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The annual report on form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. for the year ended
October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ADC
Telecommunications, Inc.
 /s/ Robert E. SwitzRobert E. SwitzDecember 18, 2007/s/ James G. MathewsJames G. MathewsDecember 18, 2007
## Services & publications

-  Open data & mobility
-  Federal Register Notices
-  Official Gazette   -  Patents
  -  Trademarks
-  Support centers
-  XML resources
-  Classification

# Official Gazette

 

The **Official Gazette** (OG) is the official journal of the USPTO, published weekly on Tuesday, that includes bibliographic information and a representative drawing for each patent granted or trademark published on that issue date. There is a separate Official Gazette for Patents and Official Gazette for Trademarks, and the most recent 52 issues for each are available online.

The Notices section of the Official Gazette contains important information and changes in rules concerning both patents and trademarks. You may view these Notices below. They are also available in the electronic version of the OG for Patents.

## Official Gazette Notices Search: 1995 - Present

Search:  

##  

## Recent Official Gazette Notices by Year

                      - Browse 2024
                      - Browse 2023
                      - Browse 2022
                      - Browse 2021
                      - Browse 2020
                      - Browse 2019
                      - Browse 2018
                      - Browse 2017
                      - Browse 2016
                      - Browse 2015
                      - Browse 2014
                      - Browse 2013
                      - Browse 2012
                      - Browse 2011
                      - Browse 2010
                      - Browse 2009
                      - Browse 2008
                      - Browse 2007
                      - Browse 2006
                      - Browse 2005
                      - Browse 2004
                      - Browse 2003
                      - Browse 2002
                      - Browse 2001
                      - Browse 2000
                      - Browse 1999
                      - Browse 1998
                      - Browse 1997
                      - Browse 1996
                      - Browse 1995

## Consolidated Listing of Official Gazette Notices 1964-1998

The Consolidated Listing is a compilation of the more important notices and rule changes which were published in the Official Gazette **from July 1, 1964, through December 31, 1998** . Note: Some of the information in this listing is no longer in effect and is merely provided for historical purposes.
                      - Browse 1964 - 1998
B EIRNE , M AYNARD & P ARSONS , L
. L
. P
. 1300 POST OAK BOULEVARD

SUITE 2500 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77056-3000

(713) 623-0887 FAX (713) 960-1527 

### January 12, 2015 Christopher A. Prine Clerk, First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Houston, Texas 77002-2066 Re: 01-15-00006-CV; Paula Hill et. al. v. Baylor College of Medicine et. al.



### Parties’ Joint Notice of Impending Settlement Dear Mr. Prine: The appellants and appellees in the above-captioned appeal jointly inform the Court that they are in the process of settling this case. The parties expect to finalize their settlement very shortly. Once the settlement agreement is signed, the appellants will file a motion with the Court this week to dismiss the appeal. Due to their impending settlement, the parties also jointly request that the Court abate consideration of appellants’ pending Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal and also correspondingly abate appellees’ deadline to file a response thereto. That pending motion will become moot upon dismissal of the appeal. Thank you for your usual courtesy and cooperation.

Respectfully submitted,

TWOMEY | M AY

, PLLC By: /s/ George F. May George F. May State Bar No. 24037050 George@twomeymay.com 2 Riverway, 15 th Floor Houston, Texas 77056 B EIRNE , MAYNARD & P ARSONS , L.L.P. By: /s/ N. Terry Adams, Jr. Thomas P. Sartwelle State Bar No. 17656000 tsartwelle@bmpllp.com N. Terry Adams, Jr. State Bar No. 00874010 N. T ERRY A DAMS , J R

. P ARTNER Direct Dial (713) 960

- 7319 Email: tadams@bmpllp.com ACCEPTED 01-15-00006-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/12/2015 2:23:46 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKChristopher A. Prine, Clerk

First Court of Appeals January 12, 2015 Page 2

939690v.1 003765/050175 Telephone:(713) 659-0000 Facsimile: (713) 201-8485 A TTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS / PLAINTIFFS P

AULA HILL ET. AL . V INSON & ELKINS LLP By: /s/ Patrick W. Mizell Patrick W. Mizell State Bar No. 14233980 pmizell@velaw.com Stacey N. Vu State Bar No. 24047047 svu@velaw.com 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77002-3014 Telephone:(713) 758-2932 Facsimile: (713) 615-5912 A TTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE / D EFENDANT T EXAS C HILDREN ’ S H OSPITAL tadams@bmpllp.com Forrest J. Wynn State Bar No. 24037750 fwynn@bmpllp.com 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77056-3000 Telephone: (713) 623-0887 Facsimile: (713) 960-1527
A TTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES / D EFENDANTS B AYLOR C OLLEGE OF MEDICINE , S ALWA S HENAQ , M.D., INDEPENDENT E XECUTOR OF T HE E STATE OF S ALEH S HENAQ , M.D., AND F ELIX R. S HARDONOFSKY , M.D.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00363-CV

IN THE MATTER OF B.R. §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (323-113215-20)

June 1, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the sex-offender registration 

order of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.405 How must a cargo transfer system be tested and inspected? ( a ) No person may transfer oil or natural gas through a cargo transfer system (CTS) at a deepwater port unless it has been inspected and tested according to this section.
( b ) The single point mooring (SPM)-CTS must be maintained as required by the design standards used to comply with § 149.650 of this chapter.
( c ) If the manufacturer's maximum pressure rating for any cargo transfer hose in a SPM-CTS has been exceeded, unless it was exceeded for testing required by this section, the hose must be: ( 1 ) Removed;
( 2 ) Hydrostatically tested to 1.5 times its maximum working pressure for oil, or 1.1 times its maximum working pressure for natural gas; and
( 3 ) Visually examined externally and internally for evidence of: ( i ) Leakage;
( ii ) Loose covers;
( iii ) Kinks;
( iv ) Bulges;
( v ) Soft spots; and
( vi ) Gouges, cuts, or slashes that penetrate the hose reinforcement.
( d ) Each submarine hose used in cargo transfer operations in an SPM-CTS must have been removed from its coupling, surfaced, and examined as described in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section, within the preceding 2 years for oil, or 15 months for natural gas; and
( e ) Before resuming cargo transfer operations, each submarine hose in an SPM-CTS must be visually examined in place as described in paragraph (c)(3) of this section after cargo transfer operations are shut down due to sea conditions at the deepwater port.
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE) 

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-QSB") that, to the best of their knowledge: 

 

(1) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| Dated: November  10, 2005 |   |  

/s/ Yanlin HanYanlin Han

Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |
| Dated: November 10, 2005  |   | /s/ Garry Wong

Garry WongChief Financial Officer         |

 

 

 

 

 

 
|  |
|--|
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2007**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|           |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|
| April 30, 2007 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|           |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|           |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|                |        |        |  |  |
Submitted on petitioner’s petition for reconsideration March 30,

reconsideration allowed; opinion (111 Or App 659, 825 P2d 298) withdrawn; affirmed August 26, 1992

#### DION HAYES, *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE, *Respondent.*

(CA A67392)

836 P2d 767

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for petition.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

RICHARDSON, P. J.

*38RICHARDSON, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of our decision dismissing his petition for judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole. 111 Or App 659, 825 P2d 298 (1992). We allow reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, withdraw the opinion and address the merits of the original petition. *See Owens v. Board of Parole,*113 Or App 507, 834 P2d 547 (1992). We review for substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings and for errors of law. ORS 183.482(7), (8)(c).

Petitioner was sentenced to three consecutive five-year terms of imprisonment on the basis of three convictions for rape in the first degree. At his prison term hearing, the Board of Parole established a history risk score of 8, a crime severity rating of 6 and a matrix of 63 to 65 months. Petitioner does not challenge those findings. The Board added one and a portion of one standard deviation for aggravation factor C, for a total prison term of 72 months. Petitioner challenges the use of aggravation factor C.

OAR 255-35-013, Exhibit E-l, defines aggravation factor C:

> “Knew or had reason to know the victims were particularly vulnerable i.e., aged, handicapped, very young. (Pursuant to ORS 144.787, in cases of physical or sexual assault, a victim’s particular vulnerability or injury shall constitute an aggravating factor.)”

The Board recited in its order that the victim was nine years old. Petitioner claims that the Board inappropriately applied the factor, because it relied solely on the victim’s age, contrary to *Jarvis v. State Board of Parole,*96 Or App 322, 773 P2d 3, *rev den*308 Or 197 (1989). Petitioner is wrong. The record demonstrates that the Board relied, not only on the child’s age, but also on her “particular vulnerability.” The Board noted that “the victim was particularly vulnerable in that the defendant was her uncle and also living at her grandmother’s house,” where the rapes took place. The Board’s finding of aggravation factor C is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.
-60-

EXHIBIT (23)






                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of TRINOVA Corporation of our report dated January 22, 1997, included in
Exhibit 13 to Form 10-K.

      Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of TRINOVA
Corporation listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

      We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-1709 on Form S-3 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement No. 33-9127 on Form S-3 both dated March 14, 1996, and
in the related Prospectus dated March 20, 1996; Registration Statement No.
33-19555 on Form S-3 dated January 15, 1988, and in the related Prospectus;
Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-14682 on Form
S-8 dated April 28, 1989; Registration Statement No. 33-28638 on Form S-8
dated May 10, 1989; Registration Statement No. 33-54059 on Form S-8 dated
June 10, 1994; and Registration Statement No. 33-55399 on Form S-8 dated
September 8, 1994, of our report dated January 22, 1997, with respect to the
financial statements of TRINOVA Corporation incorporated herein by reference,
and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the
financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
TRINOVA Corporation.

                                                  



                                          /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Toledo, Ohio
March 10, 1997