alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cox and wife, &c. *vs*Combs.

Case.

*Case*61.

Error to the Perry Circuit.

*January*22.

*Divorces. Marriage.*

Case stated.

A marriage by a party divorced, under the act of 1809, (1 *Stat. Law,*123,) within two years after the rendition of the decree of divorce, is invalid.

Judge Bkecx

delivered the opinion of the Couit.

In April, 1834, by a decree of the Perry Circuit Court, Sarah Johnson was divorced from her husband, Randal Johnson, and as to her the marriage contract set aside and dissolved. The abandonment by the husband constituted the offence or cause, for which the divorce was granted.

Some three or four months after the rendition of this decree, and while Randal Johnson was still living, the said Sarah married Jeremiah Combs. The validity of that marriage arises in this case, and is the only question necessary to notice.

The sixth section of the act of 1809, regulating divorces in this Commonwealth, (1 *Stat. Law,*123,) provides:

“That if there shall, on hearing, appear to be just cause for a divorce within the provisions of this act, according to the sound construction thereof, the Court shall pronounce a decree declaring the complainant divorced from his or her husband or wife; but such decree shall not operate so as to release the offending party, who shall, nevertheless, remain subject to all the pains qnd penalties which the law prescribes against a marriage whilst a former husband or wife is living; nor shall it authorize the injured party again to contract matrimony within two years from the time of pronouncing such final decree.”

If the last clause in this section was intended to have any effect, as we are bound to presume it was, it must ■have been to incapacitate the divorced party from contracting a second marriage within the specified period. The clause immediately preceding, provides that the offending party shall still be restricted as to a second marriage without limitation; and should one be con*232trac'ted, subject to the same punishment as if no divorce had been granted.

*Apperson and Fulkerson*for plaintiffs; *H. G. Harris*for defendant.

As to the divorced party, the restriction is limited to two years, and no penalty is imposed for a second marriage within that time.

Both clauses must have been intended, we apprehend, to qualify and limit the effect of the decree. As to the offending party in reference to a second marriage, the decree confers no rights and affords no protection whatever. But as to the divorced party, the decree is not to have the effect to authorize or render valid a second marriage till two years after its rendition.

Our conclusion, therefore, is that the marriage in this case was unauthorized and invalid, and could not be relied upon by the plaintiff, Sarah, as a marriage either *de jure*or *defacto.*

There was no error, therefore, in the instruction to the jury, and the judgment is affirmed.
Nutrition Services Incentive Program for the States/Territories 9/7/2011 

FY 2011 Final Cash Allocation 

State/Territory 

Nutrition Services 

Incentive Program 

Alabama $2,757,851 

Alaska $355,155 

Arizona $2,137,183 

Arkansas $2,631,552 

California $12,422,425 

Colorado $1,412,481 

Connecticut $1,504,816 

Delaware $390,542 

District of Columbia $601,892 

Florida $7,752,196 

Georgia $2,827,339 

Hawaii $474,893 

Idaho $652,845 

Illinois $7,020,289 

Indiana $1,900,591 

Iowa $1,887,333 

Kansas $1,996,745 

Kentucky $1,852,778 

Louisiana $3,201,511 

Maine $583,674 

Maryland $1,899,261 

Massachusetts $4,703,430 

Michigan $7,267,382 

Minnesota $1,974,728 

Mississippi $1,201,461 

Missouri $4,055,146 

Montana $865,316 

Nebraska $1,266,994 

Nevada $1,016,007 

New Hampshire $1,103,997 

New Jersey $3,813,364 

New Mexico $1,980,506 

New York $15,419,528 

North Carolina $3,361,424 

North Dakota $806,432 

Ohio $5,577,024 

Oklahoma $2,045,615 

Oregon $1,797,863 

Pennsylvania $7,162,223 

Rhode Island $537,442 

South Carolina $1,710,911 

South Dakota $953,291 

Tennessee $1,647,948 

Texas $12,539,020 

Utah $1,332,354 

Vermont $755,471 

Virginia $2,473,229 

Washington $2,074,062 

West Virginia $1,619,809 

Wisconsin $2,651,426 

Wyoming $788,892 

Guam $393,221 

Northern Mariana Islands $62,962 

Puerto Rico $3,118,597 

Virgin Islands $200,210 

TOTAL $154,540,637
§ 127.607 Fire main systems. ( a ) Each marine transfer area for LNG must have a fire main system that provides at least two water streams to each part of the LNG transfer piping and connections, one of which must be from a single length of hose or from a fire monitor.
( b ) The fire main must have at least one isolation valve at each branch connection and at least one isolation valve downstream of each branch connection to isolate damaged sections.
( c ) The fire main system must have the capacity to supply— ( 1 ) Simultaneously all fire hydrants, standpipes, and fire monitors in the system; and
( 2 ) At a Pitot tube pressure of 618 kilonewtons per square meter (75 p.s.i.), the two outlets having the greatest pressure drop between the source of water and the hose or monitor nozzle, when only those two outlets are open.
( d ) If the source of water for the fire main system is capable of supplying a pressure greater than the system's design working pressure, the system must have at least one pressure relief device.
( e ) Each fire hydrant or standpipe must have at least one length of hose of sufficient length to meet paragraph (a) of this section.
( f ) Each length of hose must— ( 1 ) Be 11 ⁄ 2 inches or more in diameter and 30.5 meters (100 feet) or less in length;
( 2 ) Be on a hose rack or reel;
( 3 ) Be connected to the hydrant or standpipe at all times; and
( 4 ) Have a Coast Guard approved combination solid stream and water spray fire hose nozzle.
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended at CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995]
October 2, 2015

Mr. Scott Shellenberger

Perkins Cinders, Inc,

1950 East Adams #C

Show Low, AZ 85901

Dear Mr. Shellenberger:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your May 10, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Perkins Cinders, Inc. filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−2879, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12653 and #12654]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

ACTION: Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Dakota (FEMA—1981—DR), dated 06/24/2011.

*Incident:*                         Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/14/2011 through 07/20/2011.                    

*Effective Date:*                         08/10/2011.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/22/2011.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/21/2012.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota, dated 06/24/2011 is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 09/22/2011.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2011-20924 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         July 12, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 AM to 3 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tommy L. Broadwater, PHD, Chief, Grants Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., Room 5As25U, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Muscuoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 25, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-13717 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
March 28, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JONATHAN IZQUIERDO GONZALES, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00423-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is 

REFORMED to reflect administrative fees assessed in the amount of $781.00

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.800 Mill Neck Creek.

The draw of the Bayville Bridge, mile 0.1, at Oyster Bay, New York, shall open on signal between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., from May 1 through October 31, and between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, from November 1 through April 30. At all other times the draw shall open on signal provided at least a two-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.

[USCG-2008-0010, 73 FR 29690, May 22, 2008]
§ 13.01-30 Description of Silver Lifesaving Medal. ( a ) The Silver Lifesaving Medal is 99 percent pure silver and consists of a pendant suspended by a swivel from the head of an eagle attached to a silk grogram ribbon 1 and 3 ⁄ 8ths inches in width, composed of a 3 ⁄ 16ths of an inch blue stripe, a 1 ⁄ 32d of an inch white stripe, a 15 ⁄ 16ths of an inch silver gray stripe, a 1 ⁄ 32d of an inch white stripe, and a 3 ⁄ 32ds of an inch blue stripe. The pendant is 1 and 7 ⁄ 16ths inches in diameter and 3 ⁄ 32ds of an inch in thickness. On the obverse side of the pendant there appears the figure of a woman hovering over a man struggling in heavy sea and extending to him one end of a long scarf; the whole is encircled by the words: “United States of America”, in the upper half, and “Act of Congress, August 4, 1949”, in the lower half. On the reverse there appears a laurel wreath encircled by the words: “In testimony of heroic deeds in saving life from the perils of the water.”
( b ) Engraving: Before presentation, the recipient's name shall be inscribed inside the laurel wreath, on the reverse of the medal.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-39,607-12

IN RE F REDDIE LEE WALLACE, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 05-03424 IN THE 272 DISTRICT COURT nd F ROM BRAZ OS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 272 District Court o f Brazos County , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the

n d application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Br azos County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Br az o s C o u n t y . Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was

serve d with the habea s applicatio n an d that the 180-day time fra me set out in T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5) has not e x pired shall also be submitt ed with the re sponse. This application for leave to file a writ of m andamus shall be held in abey ance until R espondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: May

1, 2019 Do not publish
. .f **OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

HonorableS. Ii.

Milwee CountyAttorney Floyd County Flo@ada, Texas OpinionNo. O-7487 Rer

Officer,vho has

rs Court **aa** such nted secretary

on8 of aourse have a ccmStatesand under lsions of Section hlah we quote

"Bomember of Goagrees,nor personholdingor exercisingany **offloe** of proflt 

### or trust,uyler the United States,or either of than, or uixker any f'oreign 

### pover, shall be eligllQe**as** a member of theme. 8. R. Milwe - Pago aHoe. 8. H. MilVee - Pegs 3

**“ Po8ltioan**  lmd4r olty or **8hU** Olvil uPvlao ml@ are a& 'OfrlM8 ie 8tw.e aueB4, like offieo or j and ar6 **tmt** ~publie oWiee8~. Sm.%th-IRed **atats.** 0. 2

3 , aa 13, 501 mith-lhrd strtr. Colmt. ut. 5 B24. , HeKialey v. City ot Chiuego, 10 1. E. 2d 649, 698, 291 Ill. App. 571." The Solsatin,Treiaiagrad Semi00 Aoto? 1940, aa aaeeded,does not aretate 

### am lmprase

aataia dd'lnik dutieo ~i~~8~0ttoth0poOitio~0r8~~~farOioarlborn2. Rether 8u8ha peritlon is aonditiotmd upo~rnddetormia84b-~ the selaative 8e~ioedi~to~~adloerrlb#rdHlbmn~~r 

### the **EdI8lnt8twtion** of the bat. Purther, it 18 our opiaioe thet thlm po8lticnr

rrilrr to efuv7 vim it a del~tlon of uq pmtuti of tam 84Wr4&n pawa.
Submitted on record and briefs December 14, 1992,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 6, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of George A. Parker, Claimant. LAWLESS ROOFING, INC. and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Petitioners, v.*George A. PARKER, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-05102; CA A75470)

842 P2d 821

Alexander D. Libmann, Portland, filed the brief for petitioners.

Richard D. Adams and Myrick, Seagraves, Myrick, Adams & Davis,’Portland, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, *rev den*315 Or 271 (1992).
#### RICHARD R. QUINT *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 19735)

Foti, Lavery and Schailer, Js.

Argued January 21

officially released February 15, 2000

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
§ 127.1409 Records. ( a ) Each operator of a waterfront facility handling LHG must keep on file: ( 1 ) A description of the components inspected or tested under § 127.1403 or 127.1407.
( 2 ) The date and results of each inspection or test under § 127.1403 or 127.1407.
( 3 ) A description of any repair made after the inspection or test.
( 4 ) The date and a description of each alteration or major repair to the LHG transfer system or its valves.
( b ) The operator must keep this information on file for at least 24 months after the inspection, test, alteration, or major repair.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5692, Feb. 2, 2022]
EXHIBIT 32
                          Certification pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



R. Ray Pate, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Rebecca B. Crunk,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NCRIC Group, Inc. (the
"Company"), each certify in his/her capacity as an officer of the Company that
he/she has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2004 and that to the best of his/her knowledge:

(1)    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
       material respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
       operations  of  the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply  with  Title  18, Chapter
63, Section  1350  of  the  United  States Code, as amended by Section 906  of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





August 10, 2004                          /s/            R. Ray Pate, Jr.
---------------------                   --------------------------------
Date                                    R. Ray Pate, Jr.
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


August 10, 2004                          /s/            Rebecca B. Crunk
---------------------                   ----------------------------------
Date                                      Rebecca B. Crunk
                                          Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer


                                     24