alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision 

# DATES:

Submit written comments on or before July 3, 2000. 

*OMB Number:*                         1550—0011.                     

*Form Number:*                        Not applicable.                     

*Type of Review:*                         Regular.                     

*Title:*                         General Reporting and Recordkeeping by Savings Associations.                     

*Description:*                        This collection of information allows management of savings associations to exercise prudent controls and to provide OTS with a means of determining the integrity of savings association records and operations when examining for safety, soundness, and regulatory compliance.                     

*Respondents:*                         Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.                     

*Estimated Number of Responses:*                         1,104.                     

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Response:*                         3,369 hours.                     

*Frequency of Response:*                         Once per activity.                     

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                         3,718,911 hours.                     

*Clearance Officer:*                        Mary Rawlings-Milton, (202) 906-6028, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552.                     

*OMB Reviewer:*                        Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                     

John E. Werner, 

Director, Information and Management Services. 

[FR Doc. 00-13752 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
Argued and submitted June 29,

affirmed October 14, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*CAROL ANN TULL, *Appellant.*

(90C-21213; CA A69389)

839 P2d 249

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Dummitt,*115 Or App 487, 839 P2d 246 (1992).

Edmonds, J., dissenting.

*578EDMONDS, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissent in *State v. Dummitt,*115 Or App 487, 839 P2d 246 (1992).
# Map            Chile.
11th Court of Appeals Mandate

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF ECTOR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on March 28, 2017,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the interest of R.S. and J.S., children

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-16-00291-CV and

County Court at Law No. 2 Case No. CC2-3459-PC

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

 “This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed."

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the HON. JIM R. WRIGHT, Chief

Justice of our said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland,

on June 7, 2017.

SHERRY WILLIAMSON, CLERK

By: Myrna McGough, Deputy

FILE COPY
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.675 Back Bay of Biloxi. ( a ) The draw of the I-110 bridge, mile 3.0 at Biloxi, shall open on signal if at least six hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Popps Ferry Road bridge, mile 8.0, at Biloxi, shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not be opened for passage of vessels. The draw shall open at any time for a vessel in distress.
[CGD8-85-05, 50 FR 27583, July 5, 1985, as amended by CGD08-96-049, 64 FR 6221, Feb. 9, 1999; CGD08-06-015, 71 FR 26416, May 5, 2006]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35657-35658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of Advisory Committee to the Interagency Task Force To 
Improve Hydroelectric Licensing Processes

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this 
notice advises interested persons that the Advisory Committee to the 
Interagency Task Force To Improve Hydroelectric Licensing Processes 
will meet on June 8, 2000, at the National Marine Fisheries Service. 
The purpose of the meeting is to:
    <bullet> Update Committee members on the current activities of the 
Interagency Task Force (ITF); and to
    <bullet> Review and discuss the ITF Working Group's draft product 
on improving the conservation of the Endangered Species Act Section 7 
consultation with the Federal Energy and Regulatory Commission's 
licensing process.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 8, 2000; 9:00am-3pm.

ADDRESSES: National Marine Fisheries Service, Building SSMC3, 4th Floor 
Conference Room, 4527, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly St. Bernard, Secretary to the 
Director, Office of Habitat Conservation (OHC), (301) 713-2325.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary of the Interior and the 
Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, with the concurrence of 
ITF members, established the Advisory Committee to provide a forum for 
non-Federal entities to review and provide comments on the 
deliberations of the ITF. Interested parties are invited to

[[Page 35658]]

attend the meeting and will be given an opportunity to provide 
comments.
    Less than 15 days' notice of this meeting is being given because of 
recently resolved administrative matters. In light of the difficulty of 
making changes to travel plans and schedules and the expenses such 
changes would entail, it is necessary to hold this meeting on June 8, 
2000, as originally planned.
    You should inform Security on the building lobby level that you are 
attending a meeting hosted by the OHC, (301) 713-2325. After calling 
OHC, Security will issue you a visitor's pass and direct you to the 4th 
Floor Conference Room, 4527.

    Dated: May 31, 2000.
Alex Matthiessen,
Special Assistant to the Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-14092 Filed 6-1-00; 11:32 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-10-U
#### In the Matter of Ruth L. N. Charles, Respondent, v Thelma G. Lewis, Appellant.

Submitted June 24, 1996;

decided September 12, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant is not a party aggrieved *(see,*CPLR 5511). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 October 22, 2013

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Re: Tyler Pennywitt 

### Docket No.: FAA-2013-0716 Case No. 2012S0150128 Dear Sir or Madam: 

# RECEIVED OCT 2 92013 

## HEARING DOCKET

Please be advised that I am inreceipt ofthe Order Setting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission inthe above-referred case. However, I have not been retained to represent Mr. Pennywitt inthis matter. I have not filed a notice ofappearance inthis matter so please remove me as attorney ofrecord. Thank you for your assistance. Please contact me ifyou have any questions regarding this matter. Kind Regards.

MAS/jo
cc: Christopher R. Stevenson, Esquire Office ofthe Regional Counsel P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TI1e Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Sincerely,
Exhibit 10.17

 

NATURAL GROCERS BY VITAMIN COTTAGE, INC.

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

 

The following is a description of the arrangements pursuant to which independent directors (the “Directors”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (the “Company”) are compensated for services provided as a Director, including additional amounts payable for committee participation. Employee directors are not entitled to receive additional compensation for serving on the Board or any committee thereof.

 

Cash Compensation

 

Board Retainer

 

Each Director is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $30,000. If the Board appoints a lead independent Director, such Director is entitled to receive an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000.

 

Committee Retainers

 

The chair of our Audit Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 and the chair of our Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000. Each member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000.

 

All cash compensation is paid to the Directors on a quarterly basis, in equal installments.

 

Equity Compensation

 

Each Director is entitled to an annual grant of restricted stock units valued at $50,000 (based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on The New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant) under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan, upon election to the Board at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. These restricted stock units will vest on the date which is one year after the date of grant and will be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Director Equity Ownership Guidelines

 

Under the Company’s Director Equity Ownership Guidelines, Directors must own shares of the Company’s common stock with a value of at least three times such Director’s annual cash retainer within five years of such Director’s initial election or appointment. Restricted stock qualifies for this purpose only after complete vesting.
Rockingham

No. 7790

#### Harry Lee Daneker *& a.*v. The State of New Hampshire

May 6, 1977

*381
      *Anthony A. McManus,*of Dover and *Emmanuel P. Krasner,*of Rochester *(Mr. McManus*orally), for the defendants.

*David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *James L. Kruse,*assistant attorney general *(Mr. Souter*and *Mr. Kruse*orally), for the state.

Memorandum Opinion

Plaintiffs, all nonresidents, who have been charged with criminal trespass under RSA 635:2 and who have had bail set by the district court applied to the Superior Court for Rockingham County for release on their own recognizances under RSA 597:6-a, and RSA 597:6-b (Supp. 1975). The petition was denied on May 4, 1977, and the exceptions were transferred by *Perkins,*J., and were argued in this court on May 5, 1977. RSA 597:6-a states the conditions for release on personal recognizance. In a misdemeanor case, a person shall be entitled to release only upon satisfying the court of the following conditions:

> I. That he is of such condition, both physical and mental, that his release will jeopardize neither himself nor the public;

> II. That his employment, family ties, and residence within the state or other sufficient connection with the state make his failure to appear unlikely;

> III. That he has not, prior to his application, failed to appear in any court when required to do so;

> IV. That no other special circumstance exists creating a likelihood that he would fail to appear. RSA 597:6-a.

On the record before us, we cannot say as a matter of law that the trial court was compelled to find that all of the above conditions exist. The granting of the petition was not therefore required and the exceptions are overruled.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05823

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05823\05823_Checklist_102110_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05823\05823_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05823\05823_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05823\05823_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05823\05823_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05823\05823_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05823\05823_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05823\05823_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05823\05823_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05823\Certification Statement_05823.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05823\Supporting Documentation\05823_Coolwater Water Balance U12.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05823\Supporting Documentation\05823_Coolwater Water Balance U34.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05823\Supporting Documentation\05823_Coolwater_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
bu

Emergency Communication 4 ALL ...........................Pict

I can’t speak but I can hear 

and understand you. 

My vital information is on 

the back on this page. 

Please contact 

my family. 

My technology needs 

to be charged. 

Wind 

FREE SPACE (for your custom message) 

MY NAME IS 

WHO You, yours 

Bleed 

Broken 

Infect 

Need/Want Blanket Home Walker 

WHERE 

WHAT He, his, him 

Burn 

Choke 

Rescue 

Spell 

Clothes 

Cold Family 

Hospital Wheelchair 

Sick 

WHEN 

WHY We, ours 

Communicate 

Evacuate 

Talk 

Understand 

Damage 

Danger 

Fire 

Flood 

Pets Worried 

Shelter Worse/Worst 

She, her,

hers 

They, them,

their 

I, me, my Disability 

Emergency 

Allergy Help Bathroom 

Disaster 

HOW YES Hurt/Injure Wait Communication Heat/Hot Seizure NO Device 

Copyright © 2009 (https://disabilities.temple.edu/aacvocabulary/e4all.shtml) Developed by Diane N. Bryen & Rachel Ravitch through a grant from the National Institut
___________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PERSONAL INFORMATION 

1. NAME _____________________________________ DOB ________________________________________ Address _____________________________________ Cell Phone____________________________________ Home Phone __________________________________ Email ________________________________________ 2. EMERGENCY CONTACT Name________________________________________ Address _____________________________________ Cell Phone ___________________________________ Home Phone __________________________________ Relation ______________________________________ 3. 2ND EMERGENCY CONTACT Name________________________________________ Address ______________________________________ Cell Phone ___________________________________ Home Phone __________________________________ Relation ______________________________________ 4. DOCTOR Name________________________________________ Address ______________________________________ Phone _______________________________________ 5. HEALTH INSURANCE 

Private Medicare Medicaid Other _________ 

Policy Number _________________________________ Date Issued __________________________________ 

6. PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS Name & Dosage _____________________________Name & Dosage _____________________________Name & Dosage _____________________________Name & Dosage _____________________________Name & Dosage _____________________________7. OVER THE COUNTER DRUGS 1) ________________________________________2) ________________________________________8. PHARMACY NAME ________________________Contact Person ______________________________Phone _____________________________________9. ALLERGIES [complete list] __________________10. RELEVANT MEDICAL HISTORY [brief] ________11. SUPPORT AGENCY [if applicable] ____________

12. MEDICAL EQUIPMENT/TECHNOLOGY SUPPLI
#### Smith, *Appellant,*v. Stokes.

Practice. The trial court having directed a verdict for defendant, this court reverses the judgment, holding that there was evidence given on the part of the plaintiff which should have been submitted to the jury.

*Appeal from DeKalb Circuit*Court.—Hon. Jos. P. Grubb, Judge..

Reversed.

Wm. *Henry*for appellant.

*Ramey & Brown*for respondent.

Henry, J.

This suit originated in a justice’s court in DeKalb county, and was to recover damages for an alleged trespass committed by defendant in hauling from or near *179Ins premises two dead hogs and depositing them in plaintiff’s field. Defendant had a judgment in the justice’s court, and on appeal by plaintiff to the circuit court, defendant again obtained a judgment, from which plaintiff appeals to this court.

From the evidence it appears that the defendant directed his two minor sons to haul the hogs away and deposit them in his own field, but, in disregard of his order, his sons took them into plaintiff’s field and left them there, and the question to be determined was whether this was done with defendant’s previous knowledge and approval.

For plaintiff, D. M. Allen testified that he had a conversation with defendant after the trial of the cause before the justice of the peace ; that it occurred in witness’ field, and was as follows: Defendant asked witness why he was not at the trial ^witness replied that he did not know much about the case, only that he saw the hogs there, in plaintiff’s field; defendant then said that he did not deny that his hogs were there; that Jim took them there; that Jim said their corn was only checked one way, and that it would tear down the corn to take them through, and that he would take them up *there;*stated that he told Jim to take the hogs down to the lower edge of his field, but he took them into Smith’s field after he left and went to Cameron.

This evidence, if it did not directly establish the fact that defendant knew that Jim intended to leave the hogs in plaintiff’s field, certainly tended in that direction. If it is a question, on this testimony, whether his son told defendant before he took the hogs to plaintiff’s field of his purpose to do so, it was certainly one for the jury and not for the court to determine. The court instructed the jury that “ under the evidence they must find for defendant,” and therein we think committed error, and the judgment is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.
#### § 136.241 Compensation allowable.

The amount of compensation allowable is the net cost of the increased or additional service provided by the State or political subdivision.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Initial Review Group Genome Research Review Committee.
    Date: June 5, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 5 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Ken D. Nakamura, PHD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301 402-0838.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13718 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

         March 29, 2002


         Securities and Exchange Commission
         Washington, D.C. 20549

         Gentlemen/Ladies:


         We have received from our auditors, Arthur Andersen LLP, a letter
         stating that our audit was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control
         system for the U. S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
         reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
         with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity
         of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national
         office consultation. The availability of personnel at foreign
         affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

         Sincerely,




         Dennis W. Carroll
         Vice President and Controller
         KeySpan Energy Delivery
         201 Rivermoor Street
         West Roxbury, MA 02132