alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. 1

0 ,--2 7gJ April 23, 1954 0 -.- /I,.3 y &4 -/% 74
Hon. Wllllam Caven 

### oninion NO. s-125 CountyAttorney Harrison County Marshall, Texas Re:

Dear Mr. Caven: Payment of travel expenses for out-of-state investigation of alleged perjury committed in Harrison County. 

## You
ment of trave

## pbve requested an opinion concerningpayexpenses 

### 0r out-of-State lnvestlgatlon of alleged perjury committed in Harrison County.

In Attorne General's OpinionsNos. O-2113 (19401, o-2756 (194OJ. o-1134 (1939) and O-W ’9 (1939) It was held that neither a countyat<orney nor a district attorney couldbe paid traveling expenses by the county for expenses Incurred while investigating crlmlnal cases. However, inAttorney General's Opinions Nos. o-3670 (1941), o-5336 (1943),and v-607 (1948) it was held that a county couldpay all reasonable and necessary travel expenses for any travel on official buslnesti.

The earlier opinions stated that Article 3899, subdivision (b),Vernon's Civil Statutes, did not include travel expenseswhile the opinions of this office since 1941 state that traveling ex enses are included. Since subdivision (b) ofArticle 3899 specificallyprovldes that county officialsmay "have charged to his county all reasonable expenses necessary in the proper and legal conduct of his office,"we agree with the reasoning contained in opinions Nos. o-3670, o-5336 and V-6q. In the letter opinion~ofthis office to Paul New, County Attorney ofYoakum County, under date of April 20, 1951, this office stated that the county attorney could be paid the reasonable and necessary travel expenses in attending the Attorney General's Conference on Organized Crime. Therefore,Attorney General's Opinions Nos. O-1279, o-1134, O-2113 and o-2756 are expressly overruled.Hon. Wllllam Caven,page 2 (S-125)

Ordlnarlly, traveling expenses Incurredby
a cduntyyoffli?lal beyond the boundary of Texas cannot be paid for the reason that such officialhas no duty
or authority to.gobeyond thebounda3 of the State. See: Att'y. Geti.Ops. Nos. v-525 (19 8) and

### v-520 (1948). However, at times It may be necessary for a county ettorney to go beyond the boundary of the State In order to Investigate en alleged crime committedwithin his jurisdiction. In that event, subdivision (b) ofArticle 3899 would authorize the payment ofhis reasonable and necessary expenses. Whether the particular claimmentioned in your request was reasonableand necessary In the proper and legal conduct of the duties of your office Is a fact question which cannotbe passed on by this office.

SUMMARY

Subdlvlslon (b) of Article 3899, Vernon's Civil Statutes, authorizes e county to pay all reasonable and necessary travel expenses of a county attorney compensated on a salarybasis lncurred In the proper and legal conduct of his office.

APPROVED:

J. C. Davis, Jr. County Af'falrs

Mvlsion

William W. Guild Reviewer

Robert S. Trottl First Assistant

John Ben Shepperd Attorney General

JR:lm Yours very truly,

JOHNBEN SHEPPH?u Attorney General of Texas

Assistant
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

9TH FLOOR L & C ANNEX 

401 CHURCH STREET 

NASHVILLE, TN 37243-153 1 

Certified Mail 

#70110110000040086836 

Return Receipt Requested 

Mrs. Gwendolyn Keys Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

US. EPA, Region IV 

Atlanta Federal Center, 12"~loor 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Subject: OEcial Submittal Request for State Implementation Plan revisions to des 1200-03-09-.01 Construction 

Permits and 1200-03-09-.02 Operating Permits. These rules are being amended to include the Federal 

requirements for Greenhouse Gas Permitting Regulations into the State Implementation Plan. 

Dear Mrs. Fleming: 

This is an official submittal request for incorporation into State Implementation Plan revisions to rules 1200-03-09-.O1 

Construction Permits and 1200-03-09-.02 Operating Permits. These rules are being amended to include the Federal 

requirements for Greenhouse Gas Permitting Regulations into the State Implementation Plan. 

As required one copy is included with supporting documentation consisting of a certification of the rules as State 

effective with the Board order adopting the rule change, a Regulatory Flexibility Addendum, a Impact on Local 

Governments, Additional Information Required by Joint Government Operations Committee, evidence of a public 

hearing with notices and comments, and a State effective copy of Chapter 1200-03-09 with the rules included as State 

effective. Also included is a compact disk containing the documents in Microsoft Word and a hard copy of the rules 

showing the language change indicated by the strikethrough and redline marks. 

The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally approved 

State Implementation Plan. 

If you need furfher information or documentation please contact Malcolm Butler at (615) 532-0600. 

Sincerely, 

A 

Barry R: Stephens, P.E. 

Technical Secretary 

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board 

Enclosures 

CC: Mr. R. Scott Davis. Branch Chief
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 3, 2012 

d0731 

Order 

 

August 3, 2012 

145519 & (12) 

FLORA GARCIA, Personal Representative of 

the ESTATE OF ZAVIEAR HOLLIS, Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 145519 

 COA: 310708 

Oakland CC: 2010-114896-NH 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL-OAKLAND 

and TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION, d/b/a 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND HOSPITAL, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.153 Corte Madera Creek.

The draw of the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District bridge, mile 0.5 near Greenbrae, shall be maintained in the fully open position, except for the crossing of trains or for maintenance.

[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35527, June 30, 1998]
Version 10.2018

Request for No-Cost Extension

A No-Cost Extension is the non-competitive increase of time, up to 12 months, of the final budget period 

without additional federal funds or change in scope to complete existing project activities, or permit the 

orderly closeout of the grant. The extension may not be approved solely because funds remain 

unobligated at the end of the period of performance and is not to be used to complete new activities

not previously approved for the award by the ACL program and grant staff.

No-Cost Extensions should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the scheduled end of the project 

period. Requests received after the scheduled project period end date will not be processed. 

Documents Required

1. A dated cover letter signed by the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) that 

includes:

• Grant Award Number and Grantee Organization Name 

• Specific proposed end date (i.e. June 30, 2018)

• Written justification that includes:

o Amount of remaining unobligated funds, if applicable 

o Explanation on why the work has not been completed and a detailed work plan 

on how all unfinished activities will be completed by the proposed extended end 

date.

How to submit your request

All requests for No-Cost Extension should be submitted by the grantee in Grants Management Module 

as a new amendment by accessing “Manage Amendments”, click “New”, select “ACL No Cost Extension 

(Type 4)” and “Create Amendment”. 

GrantSolutions has a training video showing grantees how to request and manage grant amendments –

which include no-cost extension requests. This video is at the bottom of this page.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.381 Clearwater River.

The draws of the Camas Prairie railroad bridge, mile 0.6 at Lewiston, shall open on signal if at least three hours notice is given to the Camas Prairie Railroad in Lewiston.

[CGD 82--025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40056, June 29, 2000]
#### Richmond & D. R. Co. *v.*Scott.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Dec. 21, 1894.)*

[20 S. E. Rep. 826.]

Review on Appeal — Motion for New Trial — Waiver of.

In an action on the case against a railroad company, the defendant demurred to the evidence, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court, whereupon judgment was entered upon said verdict. The defendant made no motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial: *held,*that the omission to make said motion puts it out of the power of this court to review the proceedings.

Error to circuit court, Albemarle county.

Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff below, *W.*C. Scott, the defendant, the Richmond & Danville Eailroad Company, appealed.

Affirmed.

*Kirkpatrick &*Blackford, for plaintiff in error.

*L. C. Bailey*and *J. K. M. Korton,*for defendant in error.

Fauntleroy, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the circuit court of Albemarle county, rendered on the 14th day of May, 1892, in an action of trespass on the case for damages, in said court pending, in which *W.*C. Scott, Jr., is plaintiff, *872and the Richmond *&*Danville Railroad Company is defendant. After the evidence was all heard, the defendant demurred thereto ; and the jury assessed the plaintiff’s damages at §2,500, subject to the judgment of the court upon the demurrer, and entered judgment for the plaintiff according to the verdict, and for costs. The case is here upon a writ of error, which was awarded by one of the judges of this court.

The record shows that there was not a motion addressed to the court for a new trial; and under the ruling of this court in the case of Newberry v. Williams, 89 Va. 298, 15 S. E. 865, and the cases therein cited, the omission of a motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial puts it out of the power of this court to review the proceedings had in the case in the trial court. The writ of error must therefore be dismissed, as having been improvidently awarded, and the judgment of the circuit court of Albemarle affirmed.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 589 

Designating the week beginning June 9, 2008, as ‘‘National Health 

Information Technology Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2008 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning June 9, 2008, as ‘‘National 

Health Information Technology Week’’. 

Whereas the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society has worked collaboratively with more than 

60 stakeholder organizations for more than 47 years to 

transform healthcare with improved uses of information 

technology and management systems; 

Whereas the Center for Information Technology Leadership 

estimates that the implementation of national standards 

for interoperability and the exchange of health information would save the United States resources relating to 

healthcare each year; 

Whereas healthcare information technology has been shown 

to improve the quality and safety of the delivery of 

healthcare in the United States; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 589 ATS 

Whereas healthcare information technology and management 

systems have been recognized as essential tools for improving the quality and cost efficiency of the healthcare 

system; 

Whereas the President and the Secretary of Health and 

Human Services have made a commitment to leverage 

the benefits of the healthcare information technology and 

management systems by establishing the Office of the 

National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 

and the American Health Information Community; 

Whereas Congress has placed an emphasis on improving the 

quality and safety of the delivery of healthcare in the 

United States; and 

Whereas, since 2006, organizations across the United States 

have come together to support National Health Information Technology Week to improve public awareness relating to the potential benefits of the improved quality and 

cost efficiency that the healthcare system could achieve 

by implementing healthcare information technology: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning June 9, 

3 2008, as ‘‘National Health Information Technology 

4 Week’’; 

5 (2) recognizes the value of healthcare informa6 tion technology and management systems in trans7 forming healthcare for the people of the United 

8 States; and 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 589 ATS 

1 (3) calls upon all stakeholders to promote the 

2 use of healthcare information technology and man3 agement systems to transform the United States 

4 healthcare system. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
§ 136.231 Authorized claimants. ( a ) A claim for loss of profits or impairment of earning capacity due to the injury to, destruction of, or loss of real or personal property or natural resources may be presented by a claimant sustaining the loss or impairment. The claimant need not be the owner of the damaged property or resources to recover for lost profits or income.
( b ) A claim for loss of profits or impairment of earning capacity that also involves a claim for injury to, or economic losses resulting from destruction of, real or personal property must be claimed under § 136.213.
( c ) A claim for loss of profits or impairment of earning capacity that also involves a claim for loss of subsistence use of natural resources must be claimed under § 136.219.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        251,367
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            2,370,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 2,257,644
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                        31,023
<ALLOWANCE>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,834,667
<DEPOSITS>                                    791,978
<SHORT-TERM>                                  376,420
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               322
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        5,461
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,660,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              5,834,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    22
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               2,121
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               50,036
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               52,179
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                326
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,485
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          33,694
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               487,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (454,001)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (454,001)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (297,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      0
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0




</TABLE>
ex49.htm


Exhibit 4.9


 


Stephen Burns


c/o AMP Holding Inc.


100 Commerce Boulevard


Loveland, Ohio 45140







June 5, 2012







AMP Holding Inc.


100 Commerce Boulevard


Loveland, Ohio 45140







Attention: James Taylor, CEO








	
  

	
Re:

	
Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated September 30, 2011 in the amount of $62,000 between AMP Holding Inc. (“Maker”) and Stephen Burns (“Holder”)












Dear Mr. Taylor:







Reference is hereby made to the Note.  As set forth in the Note, the principal and interest on the outstanding balance was to be paid by Maker to Holder on October 31, 2011.  The parties, by executing below, hereby agree that the first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended and restated as follows:







“AMP Holding Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Maker"), for value received, hereby promises to pay to Stephen Burns or registered assigns (the "Holder"), the principal sum of SIXTY-TWO THOUSAND AND 00/XX ($62,000) Dollars in such coin or currency of the United States of America as at the time of payment shall be legal tender for the payment of public and private debts.  Maker further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance hereof at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum, principal and interest on the outstanding balance to be paid by September 30, 2012.  Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 360 day year and actual days elapsed.  In no event shall the interest charged hereunder exceed the maximum permitted under the laws of the State of Ohio.”


 


We kindly request that you execute this letter below indicating that you agree with the above amendment.


 




	 	
Sincerely,

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
 

	/s/ Stephen Burns	 
	 	 	
Stephen Burns

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 















AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:







AMP Holding Inc.







By:/s/ Richard J. Calme


Name: Richard J. Calme


Title: Interim CFO
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.15 What is the process for submitting alterations and modifications affecting the design and construction of a deepwater port? ( a ) Alterations and modifications affecting the design and construction of a deepwater port must be submitted to the Commandant (CG-5P) for review and approval if: ( 1 ) A license has not yet been issued; or,
( 2 ) A license has been issued but the port has not commenced operations; or,
( 3 ) The alteration and modification are deemed a major conversion; or,
( 4 ) The alteration or modification substantially changes the manner in which the port operates or is not in accordance with a condition of the license.
( b ) All other alterations and modifications to the deepwater port must be submitted to the Officer in Charge of Marine Inspection (OCMI) for review and approval.
( c ) Approval for alterations and modifications proposed after a license has been issued will be contingent upon whether the proposed changes will affect the way the port operates, or any conditions imposed in the license.
( d ) The licensee is not authorized to proceed with alterations prior to approval from the Commandant (CG-5P) for the conditions outlined in paragraph (a) and approval by the cognizant OCMI as required in paragraph (b) of this section.
( e ) The Commandant (CG-5P), during the review and approval process of a proposed alteration or modification, may consult with the Marine Safety Center and cooperating Federal agencies possessing relevant technical expertise.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58279, Sept. 18, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.469 Liberty Bayou.

The draw of the S433 Bridge, mile 2.0, at Slidell, shall open on signal, except that between 7 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least two hours notice is given.

[USCG-2007-0078, 73 FR 12886, Mar. 11, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT AUGUST 31, 1997 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1997
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE SIX- AND THREE-MONTH
PERIODS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000001761
<NAME> TRANZONIC COMPANIES 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,980,238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,595,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 20,657,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,892,942
<PP&E>                                      18,901,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              77,337,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,135,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          998,885
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,502,687<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                77,337,718
<SALES>                                     76,324,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,324,575
<CGS>                                       50,386,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,178,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             215,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,188,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,178,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,010,350
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,500,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,510,350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS FIGURE INCLUDES $5,902,555 IN ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL AND $57,600,132
IN RETAINED EARNINGS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>