alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Joan W. Brubacher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mobility Electronics,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ JOAN W. BRUBACHER
-----------------------
Joan W. Brubacher
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003
§ 105.250 Security systems and equipment maintenance. ( a ) Security systems and equipment must be in good working order and inspected, tested, calibrated, and maintained according to manufacturers' recommendations.
( b ) Security systems must be regularly tested in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations; noted deficiencies corrected promptly; and the results recorded as required in § 105.225 of this subpart.
( c ) The FSP must include procedures for identifying and responding to security system and equipment failures or malfunctions.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. RP11-2253-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Technical Conference

    On July 28, 2011, the Commission accepted and suspended the tariff 
records that Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC (Columbia) filed to update 
its Transportation Cost Rate Adjustment (TCRA) surcharge outside the 
usual annual filing schedule, subject to refund and to the outcome of a 
technical conference.\1\ Pursuant to the Commission's order, the issues 
to be addressed at this conference include, but are not limited to: (1) 
The reduction in receipts in northern Ohio; (2) Columbia's proposed 
solution as well as other options that it may have considered, and; (3) 
Columbia's contracting for additional Millennium Pipeline capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, 136 FERC ] 61,062 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that a technical conference to discuss the issues 
raised by Columbia's filings will be held on Thursday, September 8, 
2011 at 10 a.m. (E.S.T.), in a room to be designated at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission conferences are accessible 
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility 
accommodations please send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b1b3b3b5a3a3b9b2b9bcb9a4a990b6b5a2b3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd9c9e9e988e8e949f9491948984bd9b988f9ed39a928b">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX 
to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.
    All interested persons, parties, and staff are permitted to attend. 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Vince Mareino at (202) 502-6167.

    Dated: August 12, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-21156 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

August 2, 2010

 

Alexander’s, Inc.

210 Route 4 East

Paramus, New Jersey 07652

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and issued our report dated August 2, 2010.  As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements of Alexander’s, Inc.:

 

Registration Statement No. 333-151721 on Form S-8

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-155727 on Form S-3

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey

 

 

----
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) 

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD) 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL 

AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

Small Electric Motors 

November 24, 2009
 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliance and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 17
 

 

This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy
 

by staff members of
 

Navigant Consulting, Inc., 

and 

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 17
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 594 

Designating September 2008 as ‘‘Tay-Sachs Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2008 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. BAYH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

JULY 7, 2008 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2008 as ‘‘Tay-Sachs Awareness 

Month’’. 

Whereas Tay-Sachs disease is a rare, genetic disorder that 

causes destruction of nerve cells in the brain and spinal 

cord due to the poor functioning of an enzyme called 

beta-hexosaminidase A; 

Whereas there is no proven treatment or cure for Tay-Sachs 

disease and the disease is always fatal in children; 

Whereas the disorder was named after Warren Tay, an ophthalmologist from the United Kingdom, and Bernard 

Sachs, a neurologist from the United States, both of 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

SRES 594 ATS 

whom contributed to the discovery of the disease in 1881 

and 1887, respectively; 

Whereas Tay-Sachs disease often affects families with no 

prior history of the disease; 

Whereas approximately 1 in 27 Ashkenazi Jews, 1 in 30 

Louisianan Cajuns, 1 in 30 French Canadians, 1 in 50 

Irish Americans, and 1 in every 250 people are carriers 

of Tay-Sachs disease, which means approximately 

1,200,000 Americans are carriers; 

Whereas these unaffected carriers of the disease possess the 

recessive gene that can trigger the disease in future generations; 

Whereas, if both parents of a child are carriers of Tay-Sachs 

disease, there is a 1 in 4 chance that the child will develop Tay-Sachs disease; 

Whereas a simple and inexpensive blood test can determine 

if an individual is a carrier of Tay-Sachs disease, and all 

people in the United States, especially those citizens who 

are members of high-risk populations, should be screened; 

and 

Whereas raising awareness of Tay-Sachs disease is the best 

way to fight this horrific disease: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2008 as ‘‘Tay-Sachs Awareness Month’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.677 Big Sunflower River.

The draw of the Columbus and Greenville railroad bridge, mile 96.1 at Baird, shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
### 1 No. 04

- 15

- 00035

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

__________________________________ Ark Dimension 4, Inc. and Robert Pospisil,

Appellants

v.

Michelle Griffith, Personal Representative of the Estate of Del O. Amy, Deceased, Appellee

___________________________________ Appealed from 216 th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12575A Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

___________________________________

MOTION TO EXTEND ABA TE MENT OF APPEAL PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT

___________________________________ Appellants, Ark Dimension 4, Inc. and Robert Pospisil, file this Motion to Extend Abatement

of Appeal Pending Finalization of Settlement, and respectfully show as follows:

1. The parties have recently entered into a tentative agreement to fully and finally settle

the lawsuit giving rise to this Appeal. The settlement will be finalized upon the closing of a real estate

transaction which, as of the filing of this Motion, has not occurred. Appellees are not parties to the

transaction in question but have been informed that closing should occur within the next thirty days.

Th e Court has previously abated the appeal pending finalization of the settlement.

2. The parties expect that the settlement of this case will be finalized in approximately 30

to 60 days, at which time they will file a joint motion to dismiss this Appeal.

3. For the foregoing reasons, the parties request the Court to extend the ab atement in

this Appeal pending finalization of the settlement. ACCEPTED 04-15-00035-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/23/2015 4:17:05 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

### 2

WHEREFORE, Appellants and Appellee request this Court to extend the abatement of all

deadline s in this Appeal pending finalization of the settlement and for such other relief to which they

may be entitled.

Respectfully sub m itted

,
BAYNE, SNELL & KRAUS E 1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 725 San Antonio, Texas 7 8209 Telephone: (210) 824

- 3278 Telecopier: (210) 82 4

- 3937 Email: dsnell@bsklaw.com

By: /S/ David C. “Clay” Snell State Bar No. 24011309 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLA NTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has bee n served upon Genevieve Klein Gold , The Nevins Law Firm, 206 W. Main Street, Fredericksburg, Texas 78624, on this the 23rd day of July , 2015.

/S/ David C. "Clay" Snell
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7308

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HIRAM GRANADOS ALVAREZ, a/k/a Pariente,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00047-HEH-1)

Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hiram Granados Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hiram Granados Alvarez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step 

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the 

record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Alvarez’s 

motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (stating 

standard). Accordingly, we deny Alvarez’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm 

the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3755

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Hubert Ruff, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 2009 Filed: April 10, 2009

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Hubert Ruff appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. He argues that the court abused its discretion by imposing a term of imprisonment that was unreasonable and exce ssive, and that the court made an error of judgment in balancing the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. First, the 18-month prison term imposed by the court was below the-2- relevant statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (for Class A felony, maximum term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release is 5 years). Second, the district court appropriately considered factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including the applicable adviso ry Guidelines range. See Gall v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007) (review standard); United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (court reviews district c ourt’s revocation sentencing decision using same standards applied to initial senten cing decisions); United States v. Nelson , 453 F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellate court reviews revocation sentence to determine whether it is unreasonable in relation to, inter alia, advisory Guidelines range and other § 3553(a) factors); see also United States v. Todd , 521 F.3d 891, 897 (8th Cir. 2008) (in imposing sentence, district court need not mechanically recite § 3553(a) factors, especially when applying advisory Guidelines range). Third, Ruff’s sentence within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Perkins , 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008), and we see no strong reasons that required a non-guidelines sentence.
Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.                    

*Date:*                         June 1, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         12 PM to 1 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To discuss topics raised at the DCLG April 17-18, 2000 meeting.                    

*Place:*                         NIH, Federal Building, 7550 Wisconsin Ave., Room 6C10, Bethesda, MD 20892-2580 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Elaine Lee, Acting Executive Secretary, Office of Liaison Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Federal Building, Room 6C10, Bethesda, MD 20892-2580, (301) 594-3194.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 23, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-13722  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40814

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR RAFAEL DELEON-AJIATAZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:13-CR-199-1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hector Rafael Deleon-Ajiataz pleaded guilty to being found knowingly 

and unlawfully present in the United States following deportation and received 

a below-guidelines prison sentence of 36 months. Deleon-Ajiataz argues on 

appeal that he was improperly convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2)’s enhanced statutory maximum sentence, asserting that he does 

not have a prior conviction for an aggravated felony as the statute requires. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 3, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40814 Document: 00512651067 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2014
No. 13-40814

Our review is for plain error. United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 

357, 368 (5th Cir. 2009).

The statutes of conviction and adjudicative records that we may 

consider, see Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 17-26 (2005); Taylor v. 

United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990), do not support a determination that 

Deleon-Ajiataz had a prior aggravated felony conviction as defined in 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1101(a)(43). Regardless of any plain error, however, Deleon-Ajiataz is not 

entitled to remand for resentencing because, as he concedes, he cannot show 

that any error affected his sentence. See Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d at 

369. Nonetheless, because Deleon-Ajiataz’s illegal reentry offense was a 

§ 1326(b)(1) violation rather than a § 1326(b)(2) violation, we REMAND for the 

sole purpose of reforming the judgment to reflect the proper statute of 

conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. In all other respects, the judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40814 Document: 00512651067 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2014
TS

– 11KK 6F , Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, TGA Trace

Reacted
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00613

- CV
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Jose Tovar Baez
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2017

- CCL

- 00694

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havin g considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment reinstating the ALJ’s suspension order. Costs of the appeal are ad judged against appell ee, Jose Tovar Baez.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 29, 2018