alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 565 

Designating May 15, 2008 as Military Kids Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2008 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. BAYH, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. 

BROWN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DODD, Mrs. 

DOLE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

KENNEDY, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SMITH, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. SESSIONS) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 15, 2008 as Military Kids Day. 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces of the United 

States are the greatest soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines in the world; 

Whereas as individuals and as a group, the members Armed 

Forces of the United States daily place their lives on the 

line for the United States, both here or abroad; 

Whereas the children of these patriots, even the youngest of 

them, recognize the incredible service their parents provide, and daily face the challenges of military life, with 

frequent moves, separation from their loved ones, and uncertainty about the future; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 565 ATS 

Whereas the voices of these children are seldom heard and 

their own particular sacrifices seldom acknowledged; 

Whereas the children of the members of the Armed Forces 

of the United States have an important creative outlet 

through the Annual Essay and Art Contest of the Armed 

Services YMCA; 

Whereas the compelling essays and artwork by military children will be published in My Hero: Military Kids Write 

about their Moms and Dads; and 

Whereas the strength of character, humor and honesty offered by these children are a hallmark for all of us to follow as we face the challenges of everyday life: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the significance of the sacrifices 

3 made every day by the thousands of families across 

4 the country and the world in support of the mem5 bers of the Armed Forces of the United States; 

6 (2) expresses gratitude for their fortitude, their 

7 strength, their compassion, and their expertise; 

8 (3) supports the efforts of the Armed Services 

9 YMCA and the many other organizations that work 

10 to assist the military families of the United States; 

11 and 

12 (4) designates May 15, 2008, as ‘‘Military Kids 

13 Day’’ in the United States and at military installa14 tions throughout the world. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Richard Coglon, President and Chief Executive Officer of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)            the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.

 
| Dated: August 12, 2005 |   |                                   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                   |
|                   |   |                                   |
|                   |   | /s/ Richard Coglon                     |   |
|                   |   | Richard Coglon                         |
|                   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer, |
|                   |   | Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.            |
|                   |   |                                   |
|                   |   |                                   |
|                   |   |                                   |   |
|                   |   |                                   |
|                   |   |                                   |
|                   |   |                                   |
|                        |        |                                        |  |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. and will be retained by Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (100)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,261
<PP&E>                                          28,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,265)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,576
<BONDS>                                         23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               52
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,388
<SALES>                                         46,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,598
<CGS>                                           41,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,370)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.56)
        

</TABLE>
**-  Midwest  
-  Morris, Minnesota 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**Improved Ghg Inventory Methods for California
**Location: Morris, Minnesota**
												Project Number: 3645-11000-003-01Project Type:																				Reimbursable

Start Date: Feb 01, 2007End Date: Jun 01, 2010

**Objective:**Develop and validate a new method designed to estimate methane emissions from landfills taking into account the oxidation of methane in cover soil and other parameters.
**Approach:**Determine data needs, consult available data bases and validate data. Create a field and laboratory validated methane oxidation sub-model. Develop an integrated landfill methane mass balance model for California. This model will include the following sub-models: Methane Generation, Methane Recovery, Methane Emission, Methane Oxidation, Methane Migration, Change in Storage and Methane Balance. Field scale validation will be done at a minimum of two sites in California. Statistically analyze the field monitoring data to determine emission trends and dependent variables.
    Project TeamJohnson, Jane  
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 
Related National Programs Global Change(204)  							Last Modified: 05/08/2009 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Afrim Hysenaj, * From the County Criminal

 Court No. 2 of Denton County,

 Trial Court No. CR-2011-08412-B.

Vs. No. 11-13-00219-CR * August 6, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Priority Area 1 Priority Area 2 Priority Area 3

SHIP AAA ADRC

Alabama $ 269,071 $ 149,246 $ 95,748

Alaska $ 32,541 $ 18,058 $ 8,481

Arizona $ 219,562 $ 121,722 $ 113,079

Arkansas $ 248,553 $ 137,894 $ 58,700

California $ 1,015,619 $ 562,690 $ 171,964

Colorado $ 133,530 $ 74,054 $ 78,725

Connecticut $ 96,673 $ 53,575 $ 62,297

Delaware $ 43,663 $ 24,224 $ 17,970

DC $ 15,423 $ 8,542 $ -

Florida $ 751,552 $ 416,509 $ 400,476

Georgia $ 418,048 $ 231,916 $ 151,355

Hawaii $ 70,652 $ 39,185 $ 24,352

Idaho $ 96,843 $ 53,756 $ 28,199

Illinois $ 421,849 $ 233,922 $ 204,770

Indiana $ 292,746 $ 162,383 $ 114,073

Iowa $ 181,467 $ 100,739 $ 56,745

Kansas $ 127,707 $ 70,886 $ 48,283

Kentucky $ 320,917 $ 178,100 $ 85,312

Louisiana $ 224,495 $ 124,486 $ 78,885

Maine $ 107,322 $ 59,585 $ 30,358

Maryland $ 142,345 $ 78,901 $ 92,648

Massachusetts $ 207,495 $ 114,976 $ 120,890

Michigan $ 380,777 $ 211,191 $ 175,178

Minnesota $ 224,347 $ 124,484 $ 90,829

Mississippi $ 229,129 $ 127,166 $ 55,367

Missouri $ 306,293 $ 169,934 $ 6,937

Montana $ 73,101 $ 40,584 $ 14,313

Nebraska $ 90,434 $ 50,201 $ 31,147

Nevada $ 86,334 $ 47,859 $ 45,303

New Hampshire $ 68,126 $ 37,817 $ 26,515

New Jersey $ 202,700 $ 112,269 $ 147,893

New Mexico $ 108,938 $ 60,440 $ 37,153

New York $ 727,589 $ 403,202 $ 331,109

North Carolina $ 529,050 $ 293,470 $ 111,180

North Dakota $ 35,557 $ - $ -

Ohio $ 450,907 $ 250,046 $ 213,365

Oklahoma $ 193,795 $ 107,538 $ 67,101

Oregon $ 167,703 $ 93,058 $ 75,286

Pennsylvania $ 516,620 $ 286,443 $ 250,326

Rhode Island $ 30,955 $ 17,145 $ 20,105

South Carolina $ 269,313 $ 149,368 $ 93,725

South Dakota $ 50,872 $ 28,245 $ 15,537

Tennessee $ 370,365 $ 205,458 $ 122,365

Texas $ 823,861 $ 456,771 $ 362,429

Utah $ 77,251 $ 42,859 $ 32,246

Vermont $ 50,997 $ 28,316 $ 13,077

Virginia $ 312,637 $ 173,426 $ 134,207

Washington $ 209,335 $ 116,121 $ 118,939

West Virginia $ 151,000 $ 83,805 $ 41,074

Wisconsin $ 246,108 $ 136,583 $ 104,421

Wyoming $ 34,302 $ - $ -

Puerto Rico $ 20,105 $ 11,097 $ -

Total $ 12,476,574 $ 6,880,245 $ 4,780,437

MIPPA State Awards by Priority Area

Fiscal Year 2019
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

KING, STEPHENS, and BAKER, 

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Lucas R. PASSA

Missile Technician Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202000041

Decided: 22 July 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judges: 

Kimberly J. Kelly (arraignment)

Chad Temple (trial)

Sentence adjudged 13 December 2019 by a general court-martial 

convened at Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton, Washington, consisting of 

a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:

reduction to E-1, confinement for 18 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Commander Scott Stoebner, JAGC, USN

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.
United States v. Passa, NMCCA No. 202000041

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 

U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
#### § 105.550 Alternative screening.

If the owner or operator of a U.S. cruise ship terminal chooses to screen using equipment or methods other than those described in § 105.545, the equipment and methods must be described in detail in an approved TSP.
Adult Protective Services Formula Grants (EJAP) for the States/Territories

FY 2023 Annual Allocation

8/10/2023

State/Territory

Adult Protective 

Services Formula 

Grants (EJAP)

Alabama $210,045

Alaska $106,818

Arizona $304,798

Arkansas $123,520

California $1,420,353

Colorado $211,512

Connecticut $155,095

Delaware $106,818

District of Columbia $20,200

Florida $1,042,877

Georgia $382,089

Hawaii $106,818

Idaho $106,818

Illinois $501,309

Indiana $266,175

Iowa $133,114

Kansas $115,970

Kentucky $183,102

Louisiana $181,942

Maine $106,818

Maryland $241,638

Massachusetts $289,425

Michigan $433,482

Minnesota $229,286

Mississippi $117,438

Missouri $257,472

Montana $106,818

Nebraska $106,818

Nevada $121,959

New Hampshire $106,818

New Jersey $375,591

New Mexico $106,818

New York $823,135

North Carolina $423,734

North Dakota $106,818

Ohio $498,545

Oklahoma $152,713

Oregon $181,745

Pennsylvania $580,104

Rhode Island $106,818

South Carolina $225,718

South Dakota $106,818

Tennessee $280,692

Texas $941,261

Utah $106,818

Vermont $106,818

Virginia $335,314

Washington $297,481

West Virginia $106,818

Wisconsin $253,127

Wyoming $106,818

American Samoa $14,242

Guam $14,242

Northern Mariana Islands $14,242

Puerto Rico $164,340

Virgin Islands $14,242

TOTAL $14,242,357
Last updated on Monday, May 05, 2014 http://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/

Air Markets Program Data

Contact Us

Home Query Maps & Reports Prepackaged Data Glossary Related Resources About

Air Markets Program Data

The Air Markets Program Data tool allows users to search EPA data to answer scientific, 

general, policy, and regulatory questions about industry emissions. More information about

EPA's emissions trading programs can be found on our Programs and Regulations page.

Get started: Visit the Aboutpage to view the Air Markets Program Data Video Tutorial.

Create a Query

This section allows users to create custom queries of 

emissions, allowance, compliance and/or facility

information.

The query tool allows users to create user-defined 

queries based on program, date, location, facility name, 

unit characteristics or classifications, owners and

operators, or representatives. The results can be

previewed or downloaded.

START

Get Maps & Reports 

This section allows users to access maps and predefined reports of emissions and allowance data with a 

simple, interactive interface.

Several reports and charts are available to show trends 

in emissions, view top emitters, look up your allowance 

account balance, view allowance allocations, and more.

START

Air Markets Program Data Highlights

March 14, 2014

AMPD will not be available this Sunday, March 16th from 12:00 noon until approximately 9:00 p.m. EST due to scheduled upgrades. 

More

Air Markets Program Data | US EPA Page 1 of 1

http://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/ 6/4/2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Institute of Standards and Technology

          - [Docket No. 110524296-1455-02]

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), United States Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

NIST is extending the deadline for submitting comments regarding the governance structure for the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) to 3 p.m. Eastern Time, August 30, 2011. NIST will accept only electronic submissions during the extended time period.

# DATES:

Comments must be received no later than 3 p.m. Eastern Time August 30, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Electronic comments may be sent to                         *NSTICnoi@nist.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ross J. Micheals via e-mail at                         *ross.micheals@nist.gov*                         or telephone (301) 975-3234.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On June 14, 2011, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced that it was soliciting comments on potential models for the formation and structure of the Identity Ecosystem governance body. The due date for submission of comments was July 22, 2011. Due to requests from the public and in order to provide all interested parties the opportunity to submit comments, NIST is extending the solicitation period until 3 p.m. Eastern Time, August 30, 2011. Proposals received between July 22, 2011 and the publication date of this notice of extension shall be deemed timely and will be given full consideration. Persons who submitted comments between July 22, 2011 and the date of publication of this notice need not resubmit their comments. During the extended solicitation period, NIST will accept only electronic submissions.

Some members of the public submitted several versions of their comments. In those cases, NIST will consider and post only the last version received.

Dated: August 9, 2011.

Willie E. May,

Associate Director for Laboratory Programs.

[FR Doc. 2011-20816 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
[Cite as State v. Cooley, 2024-Ohio-123.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

 - vs -

KEORIE D. COOLEY,

Appellant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. CA2023-07-073

D E C I S I O N

 1/16/2024

APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CR2022-12-1699

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and John C. Heinkel, Assistant 

Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Christopher P. Frederick, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Keorie D. Cooley, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript 

of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review 
Butler CA2023-07-073

- 2 -

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of 

both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response 

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error 

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel 

for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed 

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: Mr. Keorie D. Cooley, #A817438, 

Lebanon Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 56, Lebanon, OH 45036.
[Cite as State v. Cooley, 2024-Ohio-123.]
Editorial Note on Part 116
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 116 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35012, June 19, 2008 and USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 49410, Aug. 13, 2010.

§ 116.10 Preliminary review. ( a ) Upon receipt of a written complaint, the District Commander will review the complaint to determine if, in the District Commander's opinion, the complaint is justified and whether a Preliminary Investigation is warranted. ( 1 ) The District Commander's opinion as to whether or not the complaint warrants a Preliminary Investigation will be formed through informal discussions with the complainant, users of the affected waterway, the owner of the bridge, and other interested parties.
( 2 ) In forming an opinion, the District Commander may also review the district files, records of accidents, and details of any additional written complaints associated with the bridge in question.
( b ) In the absence of any written complaint, the District Commander may decide, based on a bridge's accident history or other criteria, to conduct a Preliminary Investigation.
( c ) The District Commander will inform the complainant and the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs of the determination of any Preliminary Review. If the District Commander decides that the bridge in question is not an unreasonable obstruction to navigation, the complainant will be provided with a brief summary of the information on which the District Commander based the decision and will be informed of the appeal process described in § 116.55. There will be no further investigation, unless additional information warrants a continuance or reopening of the case.
[CGD 91-063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, 1996; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.1105 Wisconsin River.

The draws of each drawbridge across the Wisconsin River shall open on signal if at least 48 hours notice is given.