alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JAMES WYROSDICK

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1259

Opinion filed April 1, 2015.

Petition Seeking Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

James Wyrosdick, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 144.01-1 Life floats.

Each manned platform shall be provided with at least two approved life floats. The life floats shall have sufficient capacity to accommodate all persons present at any one time.

[CGFR 56-4, 21 FR 903, Feb. 9, 1956]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41407

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RYAN CHRISTOPHER REAGAN

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-9-ALL

--------------------

June 26, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ryan Christopher Reagan appeals his guilty plea conviction

for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Reagan

argues that the district court improperly assigned a two-level

sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) for using a

threat of death during the course of the robbery and that the

district court’s imposition of a $1,500 fine was error.

Section 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides

that when a defendant uses a threat of death as part of a bank

robbery, a two-level enhancement applies. The threat of death
No. 00-41407 

-2-

may be an oral or written statement, an act, a gesture, or a

combination thereof. U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1, comment. (n.6). In

committing the robbery, Reagan passed a note to the bank teller

stating that, if she did not hand over all the money in the

drawer, “I do have a device that will hurt a great deal,” he had

his right hand in his pocket, and the Government introduced

testimony that the bank teller feared for her life. The district

court did not err in applying U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F). 

The district court’s imposition of a fine $6,000 less than

that recommended in the PSR is not clearly erroneous and is

specifically authorized by U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(e). See United

States v. O’Banion, 943 F.2d 1422, 1431-32 (5th Cir. 1991). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations 

Name of ADRC and Healthcare Partners: 

The Point (ADRC), Quality Partners (QIO), and Rhode Island Hospital 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Rhonda Schwartz 

 401-462-0561 

RSchwartz@dea.ri.gov

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Care Transitions InterventionSM

Project Summary: 

Rhode Island’s (RI’s) Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC), “THE POINT,” serves as 

the virtual front door to government and community services for older adults (aged 60+), adults 

with disabilities (aged 18+), and their families, friends, and caregivers. By providing clients with 

expert resources, referrals, and assistance, THE POINT connects vulnerable individuals with 

life-enhancing government and community-based programs, helping them achieve greater 

dignity and self-direction. The grantee, the RI Department of Elderly Affairs (RIDEA), and its 

contractor, Quality Partners of RI (Quality Partners), propose a two-year project to spread 

Quality Partners’ Care Transitions InterventionSM (CTI) program to the ADRC. Quality Partners 

provides CTI coaching to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries as part of its three-year 

demonstration project to reduce Medicare readmission rates, and RIDEA and Quality 

Partners are currently collaborating to train ADRC Options Counselors and benefits specialists in 

tenets of the CTI model. 

Goal/Objectives: 

This project’s goal will be to expand that existing partnership to include implementing coaching 

with THE POINT’s target populations and clients in order to reduce hospital utilization and keep 

clients in the community. The project’s objectives are to: (1) hire and deploy 1.25 full-time 

equivalents (FTE) CTI coaches, (2) generate awareness about coaching through THE POINT’s 

marketing, (3) train the Options Counselors and benefits specialists to include coaching referral 

in the client intake process, and (4) ultimately, maintain an 18 client caseload of high-risk RI 

elders and adults with disabilities. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

The products will include a Final Report that summarizes lessons learned, project outputs and 

outcomes (including readmission rates), and recommendations for sustainability and spread, both 

locally and nationally.
### SERVED: October 23, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTERS OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0292 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0293 FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0612
NOTICE AND REQUEST TO PARTIES The court is preparing to schedule these cases for hearings. We anticipate scheduling the weight and balance cases during one week, then schedule the other cases during a subsequent week. The weeks do not need to be consecutive. Please provide your dates ofavailability for January, February and March 2014 on or before October 30, 2014.
All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Attn: PatriciaMatthews· (Richard.Goodwin(Ci)dot.gov)Administrative matters should be directed to PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov). All othermatters should be addressed in writing/email to Judge Goodwin.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

2SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591
. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001



### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

### 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013- 0612, FAA-2012-0292, FAA2013-0293 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the nine months ended September 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (631)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         269,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                (50,611)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        262,269
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,174
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,155
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,681
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.98)
        

</TABLE>
Grafton

No. 7163

#### Joan L. Erdman v. Howard L. Erdman

June 30, 1975

*Ingram & Meyers ( Mr. Donald A. Ingram*orally) for the plaintiff.

*Gardner, Clauson & Boswell ( Mr. K. William Clauson*orally) for the defendant.

Griffith, J.

Plaintiff was granted a decree of divorce on September 19, 1973, and in the decree the personal property of the parties was decreed to the party in possession. Defendant filed a motion to set aside the personal property section of the decree alleging that the decree failed to take into account a prior agreement of the parties and that the court was not aware of what properties each party possessed at the time the order was made. The trial court first modified the original decree by ordering certain items returned to the defendant but on rehearing held that, based on the rule in *Douglas v. Douglas,*109 N.H. 41, 242 A.2d 78 (1968), the court was without jurisdiction to modify its original decree. Defendant’s exception to this ruling was reserved and transferred by the Trial Court, *Batchelder,*J.

*Douglas v. Douglas*held that a decree dividing property or decreeing property to a party in a divorce case was “binding and not subject to retroactive modification because of a change of circumstances.” 109 N.H. at 43, 242 A.2d at 80. The decree of divorce and the decree of property division “stand upon the same footing as other judgments”. *Adams v. Adams,*51 N.H. 388, 396 (1872). They are to be distinguished from what may be called “continuing” orders of the court relating to support, custody and occupation of premises. *381*Twardosky v. Twardosky,*113 N.H. 438, 309 A.2d 217 (1973). The court has been granted by statute continuing jurisdiction to modify orders of the latter type when subsequent changes in circumstances require such modification. RSA 458:14.

The distinction pointed out between the continuing order and a decree of property settlement in *Douglas v. Douglas*did not indicate a decree of property settlement took from the court any of its common law power to correct under the proper circumstances. *Adams v. Adams,*51 N.H. 388, 396 (1872); *Smith v. Consul General of Spain,*110 N.H. 62, 260 A.2d 95*Lester v. Lester,*109 N.H. 359, 252 A.2d 429 (1969). The trial court was in error when it ruled it had no jurisdiction to correct this decree of property settlement in the event it was based upon a misunderstanding of the facts.

*Defendant’s exception sustained; remanded.*

All concurred.
§ 127.001 Applicability. ( a ) Subparts A and B of this part apply to the marine transfer area for LNG of each new waterfront facility handling LNG and to new construction in the marine transfer area for LNG of each waterfront facility handling LNG.
( b ) Subpart A of this part and §§ 127.301 through 127.617 apply to the marine transfer area for LNG of each active existing waterfront facility handling LNG.
( c ) Sections 127.007(b), (c), and (d), and 127.019(b) of subpart A of this part apply to the marine transfer area for LNG of each inactive facility.
( d ) Subparts A and C of this part apply to the marine transfer area for LHG of each active waterfront facility handling LHG.
( e ) Sections 127.007 (b), (c), and (d); 127.019(b); and 127.1325(c) of subparts A and C of this part apply to the marine transfer area for LHG of each inactive facility.
( f ) Waterfront facilities handling LNG and LHG constructed, expanded, or modified under a contract awarded after March 4, 2022, are required to comply with the applicable standards referenced in § 127.003. All other facilities, unless expanded or modified in accordance with this part, are required to meet previously applicable standards but may request to apply a later edition of the standards in accordance with § 127.017.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39794, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2007-27022, 75 FR 29426, May 26, 2010; 87 FR 5689, Feb. 2, 2022]
§ 164.15 Navigation bridge visibility. ( a ) The arrangement of cargo, cargo gear, and trim of all vessels entering or departing from U.S. ports must be such that the field of vision from the navigation bridge conforms as closely as possible to the following requirements: ( 1 ) From the conning position, the view of the sea surface must not be obscured by more than the lesser of two ship lengths or 500 meters (1640 feet) from dead ahead to 10 degrees on either side of the vessel. Within this arc of visibility any blind sector caused by cargo, cargo gear, or other permanent obstruction must not exceed 5 degrees.
( 2 ) From the conning position, the horizontal field of vision must extend over an arc from at least 22.5 degrees abaft the beam on one side of the vessel, through dead ahead, to at least 22.5 degrees abaft the beam on the other side of the vessel. Blind sectors forward of the beam caused by cargo, cargo gear, or other permanent obstruction must not exceed 10 degrees each, nor total more than 20 degrees, including any blind sector within the arc of visibility described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) From each bridge wing, the field of vision must extend over an arc from at least 45 degrees on the opposite bow, through dead ahead, to at least dead astern.
( 4 ) From the main steering position, the field of vision must extend over an arc from dead ahead to at least 60 degrees on either side of the vessel.
( b ) A clear view must be provided through at least two front windows at all times regardless of weather conditions.
[CGD 85-099, 55 FR 32247, Aug. 8, 1990, as amended by USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39211, July 12, 2006]
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.410 Location and number of fire extinguishers required for vessels constructed prior to August 22, 2016. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76694 , Sept. 18, 2024.
Vessels contracted for prior to August 22, 2016 must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Previously installed extinguishers with extinguishing capacities smaller than what is required in table 149.409 of this subpart need not be replaced and may be continued in service so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) All new equipment and installations must meet the applicable requirements in this subpart for new vessels.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48244, July 22, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.920 How can I find notice of new or proposed safety zones?

In addition to documents published in the Federal Register under § 150.915 of this part, the District Commander may provide public notice of new or proposed safety zones by Broadcast Notices to Mariners, Notices to Mariners, Local Notices to Mariners, newspapers, broadcast stations, or other means.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39183, July 1, 2013]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 599 

Expressing the condolences of the Senate to those affected by the tragic 

events following the tornado that hit the Little Sioux Scout Ranch 

in Little Sioux, Iowa, on June 11, 2008. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24 (legislative day, JUNE 23), 2008 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HAGEL, and Mr. 

GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the condolences of the Senate to those affected 

by the tragic events following the tornado that hit the 

Little Sioux Scout Ranch in Little Sioux, Iowa, on June 

11, 2008. 

Whereas, on the evening of June 11, 2008, a tornado struck 

the Little Sioux Scout Ranch in Little Sioux, Iowa; 

Whereas 4 lives were tragically lost, and many other people 

were injured; 

Whereas Boy Scouts and Boy Scout leaders at the camp 

showed great heroism and courage in providing aid and 

assistance to their fellow Scouts; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 599 ATS 

Whereas the first responders, firefighters, and law enforcement, and medical personnel worked valiantly to help 

provide care and comfort to those who were injured; 

Whereas the Boy Scouts of America will continue to feel the 

loss and remember the courage of the Boy Scouts who 

were at the Little Sioux Scout Ranch the evening of June 

11, 2008; 

Whereas the Boy Scouts of America will continue to develop 

young men who show the character, strength, and bravery that was demonstrated by the Boy Scouts at the Little Sioux Scout Ranch on the evening of June 11, 2008; 

and 

Whereas the people of Nebraska and Iowa have embraced 

those affected and will continue to offer support to the 

families of those who were lost and injured: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses its heartfelt condolences to the 

3 families and friends of those who lost their lives in 

4 the terrible events of June 11, 2008, at the Little 

5 Sioux Scout Ranch in Little Sioux, Iowa: Sam 

6 Thomsen, Josh Fennen, and Ben Petrzilka of 

7 Omaha, Nebraska, and Aaron Eilerts of Eagle 

8 Grove, Iowa; 

9 (2) shares its thoughts and prayers for a full 

10 recovery for all those who were injured; 

11 (3) commends the Boy Scouts of America for 

12 the support the organization has provided to the 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 599 ATS 

1 families and friends of those who were lost and in2 jured; 

3 (4) extends its thanks to the first responders, 

4 firefighters, and law enforcement, and medical per5 sonnel who took quick action to provide aid and 

6 comfort to the victims; and 

7 (5) stands with the people of Nebraska and 

8 Iowa as they begin the healing process following this 

9 terrible event. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.951 Arroyo Colorado River.

The draw of the S106 highway bridge, mile 22.5 at Rio Hondo, shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
**Medicare Open Enrollment 101**

Know your options and get free help

As autumn progresses, it’s important to keep your health in mind. Medicare’s fall open enrollment period is the time for you to review your plan options and make any changes to your Medicare coverage. 

Maybe you have a new prescription that is not covered by your current drug plan or you have a new health condition. To ensure you get the most from Medicare in 2019, you should research your health and drug plan options during Medicare open enrollment.

Open enrollment closes Dec. 7. Changes made during this time will take effect on Jan. 1, 2019.

During open enrollment, you can adjust your Medicare health or drug coverage:

· Change from Original Medicare to a Medicare Advantage Plan or vice versa

· Switch between Medicare Advantage Plans

· Join a Medicare Prescription Drug Plan

· Switch your current drug plan

· Drop Medicare prescription drug coverage

Your Medicare plan options depend on where you live. To find available health or drug plans, you can look in your 2019 Medicare & You handbook or visit medicare.gov. If you’re unsure where to start, your local State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) can help.

SHIPs offer free one-on-one assistance year-round to Medicare-eligible beneficiaries, their families and caregivers. Trained counselors in your area can help you understand Medicare benefits and the enrollment process. Assistance is personalized, so SHIP counselors can help you find available options that best meet your unique needs.

The program – funded by the Administration for Community Living, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – provides services in every state as well as in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Don't wait until the last minute. Take care of your health now and find your SHIP at shiptacenter.org, or contact Medicare directly at 1-800-633-4227 or medicare.gov. TTY users should call 1-877-486-2048.
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of 12 

CASE NUMBER:P060542 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 12
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 3 of 12 

CASE NUMBER: P060542 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 12




POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 8 of 12 

CASE NUMBER:P060542 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 12
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 9 of 12 

CASE NUMBER: P060542 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 12

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 11 of 12 

CASE NUMBER:P060542 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 12
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 12 of 12 

CASE NUMBER: P060542 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 12