alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Affiliated ComputerServices, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) [Intentionally omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 14, 2003. /s/ Warren D. Edwards    Warren D. Edwards,
§ 154.1026 Qualified individual and alternate qualified individual. ( a ) The response plan must identify a qualified individual and at least one alternate who meet the requirements of this section. The qualified individual or alternate must be available on a 24-hour basis and be able to arrive at the facility in a reasonable time.
( b ) The qualified individual and alternate must: ( 1 ) Be located in the United States;
( 2 ) Speak fluent English;
( 3 ) Be familiar with the implementation of the facility response plan; and
( 4 ) Be trained in the responsibilities of the qualified individual under the response plan.
( c ) The owner or operator shall provide each qualified individual and alternate qualified individual identified in the plan with a document designating them as a qualified individual and specifying their full authority to: ( 1 ) Activate and engage in contracting with oil spill removal organization(s);
( 2 ) Act as a liaison with the predesignated Federal On-Scene Coordinator (OSC); and
( 3 ) Obligate funds required to carry out response activities.
( d ) The owner or operator of a facility may designate an organization to fulfill the role of the qualified individual and the alternate qualified individual. The organization must then identify a qualified individual and at least one alternate qualified individual who meet the requirements of this section. The facility owner or operator is required to list in the response plan the organization, the person identified as the qualified individual, and the person or person(s) identified as the alternate qualified individual(s).
( e ) The qualified individual is not responsible for— ( 1 ) The adequacy of response plans prepared by the owner or operator; or
( 2 ) Contracting or obligating funds for response resources beyond the authority contained in their designation from the owner or operator of the facility.
( f ) The liability of a qualified individual is considered to be in accordance with the provisions of 33 USC 1321(c)(4).
§ 106.225 Drill and exercise requirements. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Drills and exercises must test the proficiency of facility personnel in assigned security duties at all MARSEC Levels and the effective implementation of the Facility Security Plan (FSP). They must enable the Facility Security Officer (FSO) to identify any related security deficiencies that need to be addressed.
( 2 ) A drill or exercise required by this section may be satisfied with the implementation of security measures required by the FSP as the result of an increase in the MARSEC Level, provided the FSO reports attainment to the cognizant District Commander.
( b ) *Drills.* ( 1 ) From the date of the FSP approval, the FSO must ensure that at least one security drill is conducted every 3 months. Security drills may be held in conjunction with non-security drills, where appropriate.
( 2 ) Drills must test individual elements of the FSP, including response to security threats and incidents. Drills should take into account the types of operations of the OCS facility, OCS facility personnel changes, the types of vessels calling at the OCS facility, and other relevant circumstances. Examples of drills include unauthorized entry to a restricted area, response to alarms, and notification of appropriate authorities.
( 3 ) If a vessel is conducting operations with the OCS facility on the date the OCS facility has planned to conduct any drills, the OCS facility may include, but cannot require, the vessel or vessel personnel to participate in the OCS facility's scheduled drill.
( c ) *Exercises.* ( 1 ) From the date of the FSP approval, exercises must be conducted at least once each calendar year, with no more than 18 months between exercises.
( 2 ) Exercises may be: ( i ) Full scale or live;
( ii ) Tabletop simulation;
( iii ) Combined with other appropriate exercises held; or
( iv ) A combination of the elements in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.
( 3 ) Exercises may be facility-specific or part of a cooperative exercise program.
( 4 ) Each exercise must test communication and notification procedures, and elements of coordination, resource availability, and response.
( 5 ) Exercises are a full test of the Facility Security Plan and must include substantial and active participation of relevant company and OCS facility personnel, and may include governmental authorities and vessels depending on the scope and the nature of the exercise.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60558, Oct. 22, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13595]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1122; MM Docket No. 98-198; RM-9304, RM-9492, RM-9548, RM-9547]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Cross Plains, Allen, Benbrook, 
Brownwood, Burkburnett, Campbell, Clifton, Coleman, Commerce, Detroit, 
Graham, Granbury, Haskell, Kerens, Mason, Jacksboro, McKinney, 
Muenster, San Saba, Snyder, Terrell, Vernon, Waco, and Wichita Falls, 
TX; Alva, Anadarko, Antlers, Ardmore, Atoka, Comanche, Dickson, Duncan, 
Durant, Eldorado, Hugo, and Lone Grove, OK

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule, petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a request by Jayson D. Fritz and Janice M. 
Fritz, this document dismisses a Petition for Partial Reconsideration 
directed to the Report and Order in this proceeding. See 63 FR 63016, 
November 10, 1998. With this action, this docketed proceeding is 
terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Order in MM Docket 
No. 98-198 adopted May 18, 2000, and released May 19, 2000. The full 
text of this decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center at Portals ll, CY-
A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
International Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3805, 1231 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-13595 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER99-565-000]

Take notice that on December 9, 1998, Arizona Public Service Company (APS), tendered for filing a request for withdrawal of its revised tariff sheets filed with the Commission in the above-referenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 5, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13634  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-95-000]

Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Dynegy Inc. (Dynegy), Illinova Corporation (Illinova), Dynegy Holdings Inc. (DHI), and Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc. (DMGI) (together, Applicants) tendered for filing an application under section 203 of the Federal Power Act requesting that the Commission approve a series of transactions (Proposed Transfer) designed to transfer the equity ownership of DMGI from Illinova to a to-be-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of DHI. The Proposed Transfer is intended to effectuate a corporate reorganization.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14131 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

** **

**Audit Opinion of Predecessor Independent Public Accountants**

 

 

(Confidential Treatment Requested)

Report of the Independent Public Accountants

To the Board of Directors of

Santander Securities Corporation and Subsidiary:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition of Santander Securities Corporation (a Puerto Rico corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Grupo Santander Central Hispano, S.A.) and Subsidiary (theCompany), as of December 31, 2001 and the related consolidated statement of income and deficit, changes in subordinated borrowings and cash flows for the year then ended that are to be filed pursuant to Rule 17a-5 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Theseconsolidated financial statements and the schedules referred to below are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedules based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements arefree of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made bymanagement, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Santander Securities Corporation and Subsidiary at December 31, 2001, and the results of theirconsolidated operations and cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in United States.

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The information contained in Schedules I and II are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part ofthe consolidated financial statements, but is supplementary information required by Rule 17a-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements and,in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

 

Arthur Andersen LLP (1)

San Juan, Puerto Rico,

January 25, 2002.

Revenue Stamp No. 1760076

has been affixed to the

original copy of this report.

(1) This report is a copy of the previously issued report covering 2001, 2000 and 1999. The predecessor auditors have not reissued this report.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.523 Back River.

The draw of the Barter's Island Bridge, mile 2.0, between Hodgdon and Barters Island at Boothbay, shall open on signal from June 1 through October 31; except that, from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m., the draw shall be opened on signal if notice was given to the drawtender from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. From November 1 through May 31 the draw shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given to the drawtender or to the Maine Department of Transportation at Augusta.

[USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30879, June 28, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36397-36398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA241-0238b; FRL-6709-2]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Santa 
Barbara County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Santa Barbara 
County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) portion of the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns 
volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from metal parts coating 
operations. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these 
emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the 
Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 10, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
    You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revision and EPA's 
technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal 
business hours. You may also see a copy of the submitted SIP revision 
at the following locations:
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812; and, Santa 
Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, 26 Castilian Drive, 
Suite B-23, Goleta, CA 93117.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerald S. Wamsley, Rulemaking Office 
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 744-
1226.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal concerns SBCAPCD Rule 330, 
Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products. In the Rules and 
Regulations section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving this 
local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we 
believe this SIP revisions is not controversial. However, if we receive 
adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct 
final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this 
proposed rule. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so 
anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not 
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further 
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: May 23, 2000.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 00-14174 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.,

Appellants,

v.

HERBERT LANDI, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF 

MARION LANDI,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2507

[June 11, 2020]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE 08-025814 (13).

William L. Durham II and Val Leppert of King & Spaulding LLP, Atlanta, 

for appellant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.

Laura K. Whitmore of Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Tampa, Geoffrey 

Michael and David K. Menichetti of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, 

Washington, DC, for appellant Philip Morris USA Inc.

Scott Schlesinger, Steven Hammer, Jonathan Gdanski and Brittany 

Chambers of Schlesinger Law Offices, Fort Lauderdale, Shea T. Moxon and 

Celene H. Humphries of Brannock Humphries & Berman, Tampa, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Levine, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 13, 2011, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 20, 2011, 76 FR 22146, Stepan Company, Natural 
Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of 
controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and determined that the registration 
of Stepan Company to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled 
substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Stepan Company to ensure that the company's registration 
is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed.

     Dated: August 10, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
 Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-21081 Filed 8-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P