alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10(vii)

DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



Agreement made on December 19, 2002 between Valor Invest, Ltd. with offices located at 29 Quai des Bergues, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland, referred to as Creditor and Sona Development Corp. with offices located at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.



SECTION ONE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATION



The parties acknowledge that Debtor is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $8,639.18 as the result of loans extended by Creditor in 2001.



SECTION TWO
AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT METHOD OF PAYMENT



Debtor and Creditor desire and agree, to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms an provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment for same contained in the original loan obligation as described in Section One above.



SECTION THREE
CONSIDERATION



In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:



|a. | Method of Payment:Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in Section One, above, 86,392 shares of Debtor's common stock, valued at $0.10 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of loans provided by Creditor to Debtor.      
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Creditor's board of directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 86,392 shares of Debtor's common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.



In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.



Sona Development Corp.

/s/ Nora CoccaroBy: Nora Coccaro, President



Valor Invest, Ltd.

/s/ Cesare BetteBy: Cesare Bette, President

- 26 -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              59
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   179
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,523
<BONDS>                                          1,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           719
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,386)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,031
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (295)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (334)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
§ 136.221 Proof. In addition to the requirements of subparts A and B of this part, a claimant must provide— ( a ) The identification of each specific natural resource for which compensation for loss of subsistence use is claimed;
( b ) A description of the actual subsistence use made of each specific natural resource by the claimant;
( c ) A description of how and to what extent the claimant's subsistence use was affected by the injury to or loss of each specific natural resource;
( d ) A description of each effort made by the claimant to mitigate the claimant's loss of subsistence use; and
( e ) A description of each alternative source or means of subsistence available to the claimant during the period of time for which loss of subsistence is claimed, and any compensation available to the claimant for loss of subsistence.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Scientific and Technical Review Board on Biomedical and Behavioral Research Facilities.                    

*Date:*                         June 16, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 pm to 4:30 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         D.G. Patel, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-435-0824.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 23, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

*Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.*

[FR Doc. 00-13730  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 16, 2005



/s/ DAVID M. BUCKLEYDavid M. BuckleyChief Executive Officer
From: Robert Berman [mailto:bermaneconomics@gmail.com] 

Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 1:23 PM 

To: Christopher Bolduc 

Cc: Richard Parker; rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com; 

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; 

adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org; gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; 

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org; 

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com; Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; 

Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com; artrosenfeld@gmail.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org; 

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com; 

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org; 

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org; 

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com; 

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org; kwinder@mleainc.com; 

Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov; brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin 

Johnson; Zhimei Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; 

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com; maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; 

DYoung@energy-solution.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneider-electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com; 

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com; 

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim 

Subject: A Note on Pole Change Out Cost: 

Hi Chris, 

A quick note on the nature of pole change-out costs, and to what extent efficiency increases are 

cost-causitive. 

Poles do not last forever. They have a limited life. Indeed, many utilities are replacing / 

reinforcing older wood poles as part of a general infrastructure improvement program. 

Commonwealth Edison is currently replacing 15,000 poles for just this purpose, according to 

Terry Donnelly, the Exec. VP for Operations. 

While an increase in efficiency may hasten the change-out, under some conditions, it is not costcausative of a pole change -- only of moving that change forward in time. For example, if a pole 

required replacement this year anyway, and there was a more efficient transformer to be 

installed, one would not suggest the transformer was responsible for the change. More generally, 

if a pole change were required 10 years earlier than otherwise due to a heavier transformer, the 

cost would be the time value of money over the 10 year period, not the full cost of the pole. This 

time value of money should subject to sharing for the likelihood of a joint pole cost sharing 

arrangement, and included at its expected value (as you are currently doing). 

Hope this helps. 

Regards,

Robert A. Berman, Principal

Berman Economics

www.BermanEconomics.com
1915 Grand Court

Vienna, VA 22182

703‐281‐0490

703‐655‐8398 (cell)

BermanEconomics@gmail.com
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   GENCOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


All of the operating subsidiaries of Gencor Industries, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation, listed below are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       State in Which     Country in Which       
                                                        Incorporated        Incorporated                      
                                                        ------------        ------------                      
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>                                 
General Combustion Corporation                            Florida                                             
Thermotech Systems Corporation                            Florida                                             
General Combustion Limited                                                     England                        
Bituma-Stor, Inc.                                           Iowa                                              
Bituma Corporation                                       Washington                                           
The Davis Line, Inc.                                      Indiana                                             
Equipment Services Group, Inc.                            Florida                                             
Consolidated Process Machinery, Inc.                     California                                           
CPM/Europe Limited                                                             Ireland                        
CPM/Europe S.A.                                                                France                         
CPM/Europe B.V.                                                              Netherlands                      
CPM/Pacific (Private) Limited                                                 Singapore                       
Silver Weibull AB                                                              Sweden                         
California Pellet Mill Europe Limited                                      United Kingdom                     
CPM Brazil, Inc.                                          Florida                                             
CPM do Brasil Ltda.                                                            Brazil                         
Gumaco Industria E Comercio Ltda.                                              Brazil                         
Gumaco Projectos E. Montagens Ltda.                                            Brazil                         
CPM Industria E Comercio Ltda.                                                 Brazil                         
Gencor ACP, Ltd.                                                               England                         
</TABLE>

                                       22
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Gencor Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ E.J.
Elliott      
|----------------------
|E.J. Elliott          
|Chairman and President
|December 23, 2003     





|/s/ Scott W. Runkel    
|-----------------------
|Scott W.
Runkel        
|Chief Financial
Officer
|December 23,
2003      



27
1

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT- RTP DIVISION

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

May 12, 2014

MEMORANDUM

To: Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Lead Docket (EPA-HQ-ORD-2011-0051)

Subject: Errors on pages 3-37 and 6-307 of the 2013 ISA for Lead

From: Ellen F. Kirrane, Ph.D. /S/

EPA, NCEA-RTP

The sentence starting at the bottom of p. 3-36 and continuing on p. 3-37 of the 2013 ISA for Lead (Pb) was 

corrected to read, “Chamberlain et al. (1975) estimated that continuous inhalation of Pb in engine exhaust from 

fuel containing tetraethyllead at a concentration of 1 μg/m3 for a period of months could produce a 1 μg/dL 

increment in blood Pb”. On the bottom of p. 6-307 (the Chen et al. 2006b row), the last sentence in column 5, was 

corrected to read, “Time to metamorphosis was delayed in 100 μg Pb/L treatment.”

An errata has been included in the 2013 ISA for Lead.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 17, 2018

No. 04-17-00795-CR

Jerrod Maurice YOUNG,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8369W

Honorable Steven C. Hilbig, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED. 

It is so ORDERED on January 17, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of January, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.224 Dedicated Clean Ballast Tanks Operations Manual. Each *Dedicated Clean Ballast Tanks Operations Manual* must include the following information: ( a ) The text of the Annex of Resolution 14 of the MARPOL 73/78.
( b ) A description of the dedicated clean ballast tanks system.
( c ) A procedure for dedicated clean ballast tanks operations.
Note:
Appendix D is an example of such a procedure.
[CGD 77-058b, 45 FR 43714, June 30, 1980, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]
[674 NE2d 333, 651 NYS2d 403]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Perez, Appellant.

Decided October 22, 1996

*1060APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Adrienne Hale,*New York City, and *Daniel L. Greenberg*for appellant.

*Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney*of New York County, New York City *(Michael T. Altman*of counsel), for respondent.

*1061OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. There is support in the record for the undisturbed finding that, under the circumstances of this case, the actions of the arresting officer were lawful.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Public Hearing

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR THREE TYPES OF CONSUMER PRODUCTS

Docket Number CE-RM-87-102

January 12, 1989

Washington, D.C.

OPENING REMARKS TIME

Michael McCabe

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS

Chief, Test & Evaluation Program

Conservation & Renewable Energy

REPRESENTING

9:30- 9:40

1. Marlo R. Martin Quantum Optics, Inc. 9:40-10:00

2. Michael Totten Office of Rep. Claudine Schneider 10:05-10:25

3. Richard Hill University of Maine 10:30-10:50

4. Tom Lloyd Dow Chemical U.S.A. 10:55-11:15

5. John Hoffman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 11:20-11:40

6. David Goldstein Natural Resource Defense Council 11:45-12:05

****** L U N C H ****** 12:05- 1:00

7. Robert Holding Association of Home Appliance

Manufacturers

1:10- 1:30

8. Terry Clausen Solar Energy Research Institute 1:35- 1:55

9. Monty Winkler California Energy Commission 2:00- 2:20

10. Ray Bohman Association of Home Appliance

Manufacturers

2:25- 2:45-

11. Margaret Gardner Northwest Power Planning Council 2:50- 3:10

CE-RM-87-102 COMMENT 06A

ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY 

Public Hearing 

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR THREE TYPES OF CONSUMER PRODUCTS 

OPENI NG REMARKS 

Michael McCabe 

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS 

1. Ma r loR. Ma rt i n 

2. Michael Totten 

3. Richard Hill 

4. Tom Ll oyd 

5. John Hoffman 

6. David Goldstein 

7. Robert Holding 

8. Terry Cl ausen 

9. Monti Wi nkl er 

Docket Number CE-RM-87-102 

January 12, 1989 

Washington, D.C. 

Chief, Test & Evaluation Program 

Conservation & Renewable Energy 

REPRESENTI NG 

Quantum Optics, Inc. 

Office of Rep. Claudine Schneider 

University of Maine 

Dow Chemical U.S.A. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Natural Resource Defense Council 

****** L U N C H ****** 

Association of Home Appliance 

Manufacturers 

Solar Energy Research Institute 

California Energy Commission 

10. Ray Bohman Association of Home Appl iance 

UVJr Manufacturers 

11. Margaret Gardner Northwest Power Planning Council 

TIME 

9:30- 9:40 

9:40-10:00 

10:05-10:25 

10:30-10:50 

10:55-11:15 

11 : 20-11 : 40 

11:45-12:D5 

12:05- 1:00 

1:10- 1:30 

1:35- 1:55 

2:00- 2:20 

2:25- 2:45" 

2:50- 3:10 
January 12, 1989

Public Hearing

Page 2

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS

12. R. M . Schreck

EPRESENTING

General Electric Company

IME

3:15- :35

13. Howard Geller American Council for An 3:40- 4:00

14. Allen Wilkins

Energy-Efficient Economy

Sub-Zero Freezer Company, Inc. 4:05- 4:25

15. Andrew Takacs Whirlpool Corporation 4:30- 4:50

-andLeo Soorus

CE-RM-87-102 COMMENT 06A

January 12, 1989 

Public Hearing Page 2 

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS 

12. R. M. Schreck 

13. Howa rd Ge 11 e r 

14. Allen Wilkins 

15. Andrew Takacs 

-andLeo Soorus 

REPRESENTI NG TIME 

General Electric Company 3:15- 3:35 

Ameri can Co unci 1 for An 3:40- 4:00 

Energy-Efficient Economy 

Sub-Zero Freezer Company, Inc. 4:05- 4:25 

Whirlpool Corporation 4:30- 4:50
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.423 Atchafalaya River.

The draw of the Kansas City Southern Railway bridge, mile 133.1 (mile 5.0 on N.O.S. Chart) above the mouth of the waterway, at Simmesport, shall open on signal if at least three hours advance notice is given.

[CGD8-88-05, 53 FR 27681, July 22, 1988]