alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-46953 and Form S-8 No. 333-91192) pertaining to the Lynch
Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and the Lynch Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan, respectively, of our report dated March 7, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of Lynch Corporation included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                               ------------------------------
                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Providence, Rhode Island
March 21, 2003
1 

Food Thermometers

The Basics

● Color and texture can’t tell you if food is safely cooked.

● Cooking foods to a proper internal temperature is the best way to eliminate 

harmful bacteria. 

o FoodSafety.gov has a safe minimum internal temperature list for 

various foods, including meats, eggs, seafood and leftovers.

● Maintain hot foods above 140°F.

● Limit time that perishable foods are kept in the “danger zone” of 40°F-140°F.

● Calibrate your thermometer regularly and clean and sanitize after each use.

● Keep a temperature log and calibration log. 

Using a Food Thermometer

● Ensure the thermometer has been calibrated recently.

● Begin checking the temperature toward the end of cooking.

● After inserting the thermometer into food, wait the recommended amount of 

time for your type of thermometer before reading the temperature. 

● Insert into the thickest part of the food. 

● Stir liquid thoroughly before measuring temperature. 

● Measure the temperature before removing meat from the heat source. 

● Oven-safe thermometers: Can remain in place as the food cooks. Read after 

one to two minutes. Best for roasts, casseroles and soups.

● Instant-read thermometers: Use to check food towards the end of cooking; 

these aren’t meant to be left in the food while it cooks. Measures instantly, 

typically in 10 to 20 seconds. Can also use for roasts, casseroles and soup; 

insert sideways in thin dishes. 

● Allow meat to rest for at least three minutes before carving or consuming.
2 

● Clean and sanitize the food thermometer after each use. 

● Digital thermometers should be calibrated based on manufacturer 

specification, which will be different depending on the thermometer. Look for a 

reset button.

Calibrating a Food Thermometer: The Freezing Point 

Method

● Fill a glass with crushed ice and water. Let the water sit for a couple minutes so 

the temperature settles at 32°F. 

● Immerse your thermometer in the water and wait for the temperature reading 

to stabilize. 

● Don’t let the thermometer touch the cup. 

● If the reading is more than 2°F off, adjust it. 

● Thermometers that can’t be calibrated should be replaced.

Additional Tips for Calibration

● Thermometers should be calibrated before use, if dropped, when going from 

one temperature range to another, and after a long storage time.

● Bimetal thermometers (typically oven-safe) should be calibrated before each 

shift. Look for a calibration nut beneath the display dial. You may need a 

wrench or pliers to turn the nut.

For More Information

● Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, “A Short Guide to Food Thermometers” 

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for 

Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. 

Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express 

freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily 

represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services 

Programs. For more information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.
#### § 118.130 Fog signals.

On waterways where visibility is frequently reduced due to fog or other causes, the District Commander may require or authorize the installation of one or more fog signals to warn the navigator of the presence of the bridge. The fog signals must conform to the installation, range, and sound frequencies provisions in Subpart 67.10 of Part 67 of this chapter. If more than one fog signal is installed on a bridge or in the vicinity, their characteristics must be different to distinguish each signal. The fog signals must be directional to the fullest extent possible to minimize adverse impact on local residents.

[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16313, May 2, 1986]
§ 155.220 Discharge removal equipment for vessels carrying oil as secondary cargo. ( a ) Vessels carrying oil as secondary cargo must carry appropriate equipment and supplies for the containment and removal of on-deck oil cargo spills of at least one-half barrel.
( b ) The equipment and supplies must include— ( 1 ) Sorbents;
( 2 ) Non-sparking hand scoops, shovels, and buckets;
( 3 ) Containers suitable for holding recovered waste;
( 4 ) Emulsifiers for deck cleaning; and
( 5 ) Protective clothing
( c ) The equipment and supplies must be ready for immediate use during cargo transfer operations.
[CGD 90-068, 58 FR 67996, Dec. 22, 1993, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35531, June 30, 1998]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12 MONTHS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          2,704 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 144,300 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,164 
<INVENTORY>                                   110,779 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              266,773       
<PP&E>                                        155,977      
<DEPRECIATION>                                 58,985    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                428,332      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         117,591    
<BONDS>                                        57,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                        1,760 
<OTHER-SE>                                    181,440       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  428,332         
<SALES>                                       543,317          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              543,317          
<CGS>                                         274,155          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 274,155          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              226,236       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  398      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              8,434       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                34,094       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,903      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            21,191      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   21,191 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.29 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.27 
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.600 What does this subpart do?

This subpart provides general requirements for equipment and design on deepwater ports.
AIDD Protection & Advocacy Program 

FY 2016 

5/17/2016 

$ 500,000 

Run Date: 

Description: One-Time Reallotment 

of PR Funding: 

Input Parameters 

Total Amount for Allocation 37,941,393 

National Per Capita Average 46,049 

Percent of PCI-based Allocations 0.666667 

Territory Threshold 20,000 

Territory Minimum 205,808 

State Threshold 20,000,000 

State Minimum 384,693 

Tribe Threshold 

Tribe Minimum 

PCI Amount 25,294,275 

ADCP Amount 12,647,118 

100% Amount 

Territory Minimum 205,808 

State Minimum 384,693 

Reduction Factor: 1 

ADDPA Realloted Amounts Final FY16 

Total Amount 37,941,393 Amount 

HH Percentage (%) 100.00% 

Allotment Amount 37,941,393 

Alabama $612,842 $8,256 $621,098 

Alaska $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Arizona $679,160 $9,149 $688,309 

Arkansas $396,365 $5,340 $401,705 

California $3,239,697 $43,646 $3,283,343 

Colorado $455,700 $6,139 $461,839 

Connecticut $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Delaware $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Dist. of Columbia $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Florida $1,911,812 $25,755 $1,937,567 

Georgia $1,051,072 $14,159 $1,065,231 

Hawaii $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Idaho $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Illinois $1,234,045 $16,624 $1,250,669 

Indiana $743,896 $10,021 $753,917 

Iowa $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Kansas $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Kentucky $565,714 $7,621 $573,335 

Louisiana $553,812 $7,461 $561,273 

Maine $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Maryland $468,162 $6,307 $474,469 

Massachusetts $601,031 $8,097 $609,128 

Michigan $1,200,501 $16,172 $1,216,673 

Minnesota $507,870 $6,842 $514,712 

Mississippi $417,111 $5,619 $422,730 

Missouri $677,427 $9,126 $686,553 

Montana $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Nebraska $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Nevada $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

New Hampshire $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

New Jersey $732,670 $9,870 $742,540 

New Mexico $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

New York $1,779,591 $23,973 $1,803,564 

North Carolina $1,088,462 $14,663 $1,103,125 

North Dakota $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Ohio $1,287,080 $17,339 $1,304,419 

Oklahoma $400,908 $5,401 $406,309 

Oregon $414,158 $5,579 $419,737 

Pennsylvania $1,317,038 $17,742 $1,334,780 

Rhode Island $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

South Carolina $573,200 $7,722 $580,922 

South Dakota $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Tennessee $735,507 $9,908 $745,415 

Texas $2,394,955 $32,263 $2,427,218 

Utah $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Vermont $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Virginia $725,629 $9,775 $735,404 

Washington $620,334 $8,357 $628,691 

West Virginia $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

Wisconsin $622,558 $8,387 $630,945 

Wyoming $384,693 $5,182 $389,875 

American Samoa $205,808 $2,773 $208,581 

Guam $205,808 $2,773 $208,581 

Northern Marianas $205,808 $2,773 $208,581 

Puerto Rico $825,493 ($500,000) $325,493 

Virgin Islands $205,808 $2,773 $208,581 

Tribe-Native American $205,808 $2,773 $208,581 

TOTAL $37,941,393 $37,941,393
Order 2013-9-5

Issued: September 5, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 5th day of September, 2013

ORDER ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

By Order 2013-6-13, issued on June 12, 2013, the Department terminated the eligibility of 

Lewistown and Miles City, Montana, under the Essential Air Service program. On July 2, 2013, 

each community filed a petition for reconsideration of that Order. On August 22 and 28, 2013,

respectively, Lewistown and Miles City filed a motion to withdraw its petition for 

reconsideration.

By this Order, the Department grants the motions submitted by the cities of Lewistown and 

Miles City, Montana.

This Order is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.25a(b). 

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We grant the motions to withdraw the petitions for reconsideration of Order 2013-6-13, 

submitted by of the cities of Lewistown and Miles City, Montana;

2. This docket will remain open until further order of the Department; and

Essential Air Service at

LEWISTOWN, MONTANA

MILES CITY, MONTANA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq.

Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605
2

3. We will serve copies of this Order on the parties listed in Appendix A.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at 

http://www.regulations.gov
Appendix A

SERVICE LIST

MR KEVIN MYHRE

CITY MANAGER

305 WEST WATSON

LEWISTOWN MT 59457

MR MICKEY BOWMAN

SILVER AIRWAYS

1100 LEE WAGENER BLVD

SUITE 201

FT LAUDERDALE FL 33315

MBOWMAN@GOSILVER.COM

MR CHRIS A GRENZ

MAYOR

CITY OF MILES CITY

PO BOX 910

MILES CITY MT 59301-0910

MONTANA DOT

2701 PROSPECT AVENUE

HELENA MT 59601
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

 

 

August 2, 2009

 

 

Alexander’s, Inc.

Paramus, New Jersey

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated August 2, 2009, (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of FASB Statement No. 160, *Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements);*because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our reports referred to above, which were included in your Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements of Alexander’s, Inc.:

 

Registration Statement No. 333-151721 on Form S-8

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-155727 on Form S-3

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
Aging and Disability Resource Centers Implementing the Affordable Care Act: 

Making it Easier for Individuals to Navigate Their Health and Long-Term Care through 

Person-Centered Systems of Information, Counseling and Access 

Evidence Based Care Transition Program 

State Agency: WA State Department of Social and Health Services 

Name of ADRC and Healthcare Partners: 

Northwest Regional Council (ADRC), Yakima County ADRC, Qualis Health (QIO), St. Joseph 

Hospital, Skagit Valley Hospital, Yakima Memorial Hospital, and Yakima Regional Hospital 

Project Period: September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2012 

Contact: Susan Shepherd 

 360-725-2418 

 Susan.Shepherd@dshs.wa.gov

Evidence Based Care Transitions Model: Care Transitions InterventionSM 

Project Summary: 

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services-Aging and Disability Services 

Administration (DSHS-ADSA), supports this two year Aging and Disability Resource Center 

(ADRC) Evidence-Based Care Transition project in collaboration with one regional Quality 

Improvement Organization (QIO), the Care Transitions InterventionSM, two Area Agencies on 

Aging (AAAs), Insignia, and four hospitals. 

Goal/Objectives: 

The goal of the project is to establish an ADRC Care Transitions InterventionSM Model in 

Washington State for eventual Statewide Expansion. The approach is to build on the current 

CMS-funded Care Transitions InterventionSM (CTI) Model in Whatcom County to formalize the 

ADRC role, increase ADRC capacity to facilitate care transitions; and to develop a template for 

building additional care transition partnerships in Washington State. The objectives are to: (1) 

Formalize the ADRC role in the current Whatcom County CTI model; (2) Expand use of the 

ADRC CTI model within the same service area; (3) Provide training and implement lessons 

learned to an additional ADRC; (4) Apply continuous quality improvement and evaluation; and 

(5) disseminate project information. 

Anticipated Outcomes/Results: 

The expected outcomes of this ADRC Care Transition project are: (1) Increased ADRC capacity 

and reach with hospitals in the identified counties; (2) Improved re-hospitalization rates for 

participating hospitals; (3) Improved health, chronic conditions self management, by CTI 

participants; and (4) Evidence of improved efficiencies and/or cost savings by end of project. 

The products from this project will be: state care transitions data collection requirements; an 

ADRC CTI evaluation plan; an ADRC CTI implementation toolkit; semi-annual reports; and a 

final report.
Exhibit 99.1


                         Section 906 Certification
                         -------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-Q of the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

        The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the MLM Index Fund.


May 15, 2003


/s/ Timothy J. Rudderow
-------------------------------------------
President
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6479

ROBERT PRICE

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

ALLEN NORMAN, Sheriff of Cleveland County, in his individual capacity and official capacity; COUNTY OF CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA, Municipality, in its official capacity; SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., Municipality contracted medical provider, in its individual capacity and official capacity; ATRIUM HEALTH CARE, Private medical care provider, in its individ ual capacity and official capacity; SHEA, Head Nurse Southern Health Partners, in their individual capacity and official capacity; ASHLEY J. WILLIAMS, Nurse Practitioner, Atrium Health Care, in her individual capacity and official capacity

,

Defendant s

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

, at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 1:23

- cv

- 00012

- MR )

Submitted : July 25 , 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS

, Circuit Judges , and FLOYD , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Robert Price , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6479 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Robert Price appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure

to state a claim and failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Price v.

Norman , No. 1:23

- cv

- 00012

- MR (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2023). We dispens e with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6479 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
January 30, 2017

Mr. James M. White

Director of Operations

Compass Airlines, LLC

7500 Airline Drive, Suite 130

Minneapolis, MN 55450

Dear Mr. White:

This is in response to your September 29, 2016, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA2010-1165) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Compass Airlines, 

LLC (Compass) for an extension of Exemption No. 10196. That exemption from §121.652(a) 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Compass to substitute crosswind 

component and braking action restriction, along with a requirement to utilize automatic 

landing and approach coupler (ALAC) equipment, at the destination and alternate airports in 

place of the existing restrictions to decision height (DH) and visibility minimums of Category 

I precision approaches for pilots in command (PIC) who have not yet accumulated 100 hours 

(50, if reducible) in their current aircraft type.

The FAA notes that the Regional Airline Association (RAA) petitioned for similar relief on 

behalf of its members on October 27, 2016 (Docket FAA-2016-9404). The FAA granted 

RAA’s petition on January 13, 2017 (Exemption No. 17203). As an RAA member, Compass

has been added to the list of certificate holders authorized to exercise the relief provided by 

Exemption No. 17203. 

For the reasons above, we consider your request closed and thereby will not take any further 

action.

Sincerely,

/s/

[Enclosure]
§ 154.2111 Vapor control system connected to a facility's main vapor control system. ( a ) When a marine vapor control system (VCS), or a marine vapor collection system, is connected to a facility's main VCS serving other facility processing areas that are not related to tank vessel operations, the marine vapor line, before the point where the marine VCS connects to the facility's main VCS, must be fitted with— ( 1 ) A detonation arrester, unless both the marine VCS and the facility's main VCS only control vapors of cargoes that are non-flammable, non-combustible, or that have high flashpoints;
( 2 ) Two fail-safe, quick closing valves, one on each side of any detonation arrester required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section, which automatically close when— ( i ) A flame is detected on the detonation arrester;
( ii ) The facility's marine VCS is not in operation; or
( iii ) Vapor back flow to the marine vapor line is detected; and
( 3 ) A means to prevent backflow of vapors to the marine vapor line.
( b ) Vapors from facility processing areas unrelated to tank vessel operations must not enter the vapor line of a marine VCS before the devices required by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Except as specified by paragraph (d) of this section, a facility that wants to connect a facility vapor line, which collects vapor from other facility processing areas that are not related to tank vessel operations, to a marine VCS before the devices required by 33 CFR 154.2109(b)(1) and (2) and (c)(2), must receive approval in writing from the Commandant.
( d ) A facility may connect a facility vapor line, which collects vapor from other facility processing areas that are not related to tank vessel operations, to a marine vapor line downstream of the devices required by 33 CFR 154.2109(b)(1) and (2) and (c)(2) to share the marine vapor destruction unit.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted October 15, 1996;

decided October 22, 1996

Appeals dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this criminal action *(see,*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90).
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.488 Plaquemine Bayou. ( a ) The draw of the S3066 (Spur) bridge, mile 6.5 at Indian Village, shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
( b ) The draws of the Union Pacific railroad bridge, mile 10.5 at Plaquemine, and the S1 bridge, mile 10.5 at Plaquemine, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD 08-84-01; 49 FR 28405, July 12, 1984. Redesignated by USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70311, Dec. 4, 2006]