alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 562 

Honoring Concerns of Police Survivors as the organization begins its 25th 

year of service to family members of law enforcement officers killed 

in the line of duty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2008 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. 

MIKULSKI, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. DODD, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. NELSON

of Florida, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. SMITH, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. 

TESTER, and Mr. THUNE) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Concerns of Police Survivors as the organization 

begins its 25th year of service to family members of 

law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. 

Whereas Concerns of Police Survivors has showed the highest 

amount of concern and respect for tens of thousands of 

family members of officers killed in the line of duty; 

Whereas those families bear the most immediate and profound burden of the absences of their loved ones; 

Whereas Concerns of Police Survivors is starting its 25th 

year as a bedrock of strength for the families of the Nation’s lost heroes; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 562 ATS 

Whereas it is essential that the Nation recognize the contributions of Concerns of Police Survivors to those families; and 

Whereas National Police Week, observed each year in the 

week containing May 15, is the most appropriate time to 

honor Concerns of Police Survivors: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes and thanks Concerns of Police 

3 Survivors for assisting in the rebuilding of the lives 

4 of family members of law enforcement officers killed 

5 in the line of duty across the United States; 

6 (2) honors Concerns of Police Survivors and 

7 recognizes the organization as it begins its 25th year 

8 of service to the families of the fallen heroes of the 

9 Nation; 

10 (3) urges the people of the United States to 

11 join with the Senate in thanking Concerns of Police 

12 Survivors; and 

13 (4) recognizes with great appreciation the sac14 rifices made by police families and thanks them for 

15 providing essential support to one another. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35060-35061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2248-000]


Energy Trading Company, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 25, 2000.
    Energy Trading Company, Inc. (Energy Trading) submitted for filing 
a rate schedule under which Energy Trading will engage in wholesale 
electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Energy Trading 
also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Energy Trading requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Energy Trading.
    On May 18, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Energy Trading should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Energy Trading is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Energy Trading's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 19, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington 
DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 


[[Page 35061]]

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13638 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2016 Final Allocation

8/18/2016

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII

Alabama $242,979 $76,215 $319,194

Alaska $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Arizona $341,592 $86,912 $428,504

Arkansas $150,054 $48,157 $198,211

California $1,652,022 $471,073 $2,123,095

Colorado $232,138 $59,061 $291,199

Connecticut $181,295 $59,907 $241,202

Delaware $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

District of Columbia $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Florida $1,174,335 $344,252 $1,518,587

Georgia $419,583 $106,751 $526,334

Hawaii $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Idaho $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Illinois $591,835 $197,384 $789,219

Indiana $311,457 $98,224 $409,681

Iowa $159,800 $55,927 $215,727

Kansas $136,554 $45,843 $182,397

Kentucky $216,495 $66,595 $283,090

Louisiana $211,605 $68,518 $280,123

Maine $79,979 $23,759 $103,738

Maryland $273,601 $78,087 $351,688

Massachusetts $332,779 $109,606 $442,385

Michigan $506,430 $160,862 $667,292

Minnesota $259,171 $76,347 $335,518

Mississippi $140,908 $45,198 $186,106

Missouri $303,802 $97,643 $401,445

Montana $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Nebraska $89,107 $29,770 $118,877

Nevada $132,389 $33,682 $166,071

New Hampshire $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

New Jersey $428,510 $143,950 $572,460

New Mexico $102,848 $26,393 $129,241

New York $946,796 $318,066 $1,264,862

North Carolina $479,251 $126,782 $606,033

North Dakota $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Ohio $591,501 $197,185 $788,686

Oklahoma $183,378 $60,208 $243,586

Oregon $210,638 $56,795 $267,433

Pennsylvania $691,335 $242,944 $934,279

Rhode Island $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

South Carolina $249,369 $63,445 $312,814

South Dakota $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Tennessee $323,243 $91,810 $415,053

Texas $1,039,705 $274,281 $1,313,986

Utah $98,530 $25,068 $123,598

Vermont $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

Virginia $379,896 $102,820 $482,716

Washington $332,901 $86,291 $419,192

West Virginia $107,667 $36,736 $144,403

Wisconsin $289,528 $90,309 $379,837

Wyoming $79,188 $23,759 $102,947

American Samoa $9,899 $2,970 $12,869

Guam $39,594 $11,880 $51,474

Northern Mariana Islands $9,899 $2,970 $12,869

Puerto Rico $193,417 $54,217 $247,634

Virgin Islands $39,594 $11,880 $51,474

TOTAL $15,837,665 $4,751,881 $20,589,546
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.283 Dunns Creek.

The draw of the US17 bridge, mile 0.9 near Satsuma, shall open on signal if at least three hours notice is given.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank C. Schlitt, Respondent, *v.*William A. Adams, as Warden of Tombs Prison, Defendant, and The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

Submitted September 30, 1937;

decided October 19, 1937.

*595
      *William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney (Erwin N. Schapira*of counsel), for appellant.

*Norbert Ruttenberg*and *Nathan Siegel, Jr.,*for respondent.

Order of Appellate Division and that of the Special Term reversed, the writ dismissed and relator remanded to custody on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to give the magistrate jurisdiction. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, Finch and Rifpey, JJ.
#### Brooking *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,

Decided December 12, 1906.-

Accusation of larceny from the house. Before. Judge Little. City court of Sparta. October 20, 1906.

*T. L. Beese*and *Seaborn Beese,*for plaintiff in error.

*B.*TF. *Moore, solicitor,*contra.

Beck, J.

No error of law being complained of in any ground of the motion, except one which is treated as abandoned because not referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, and the evidence being sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury, this court will not disturb the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In Connection with the Annual Report of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin D. Lemley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Kevin D. Lemley
-------------------

Kevin D. Lemley
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2004


                                       43
. 1 

0 ,--2 7gJ 

April 23, 1954 0 -.- / I ,.3 y 

&4 -/% 7 4 

Hon. Wllllam Caven oninion NO. s-125 

County Attorney 

Harrison County 

Marshall, Texas 

Re: 

Dear Mr. Caven: 

Payment of travel expenses for out-of-state 

investigation of alleged 

perjury committed in 

Harrison County. 

You 

ment of trave pb ve requested an opinion concerning payexpenses 0r out-of-State lnvestlgatlon 

of alleged perjury committed in Harrison County. 

In Attorne General's Opinions Nos. O-2113 

(19401, o-2756 (194OJ. o-1134 (1939) and O-W’9 (1939) 

It was held that neither a county at<orney nor a district attorney could be paid traveling expenses by the 

county for expenses Incurred while investigating crlmlnal cases. However, in Attorney General's Opinions 

Nos. o-3670 (1941), o-5336 (1943), and v-607 (1948) 

it was held that a county could pay all reasonable and 

necessary travel expenses for any travel on official 

buslnesti. 

The earlier opinions stated that Article 3899, 

subdivision (b), Vernon's Civil Statutes, did not include travel expenses while the opinions of this office 

since 1941 state that traveling ex enses are included. 

Since subdivision (b) of Article 3 8 99 specifically provldes that county officials may "have charged to his 

county all reasonable expenses necessary in the proper 

and legal conduct of his office," we agree with the 

reasoning contained in opinions Nos. o-3670, o-5336 

and V-6q. In the letter opinion ~of this office to 

Paul New, County Attorney of Yoakum County, under date 

of April 20, 1951, this office stated that the county 

attorney could be paid the reasonable and necessary 

travel expenses in attending the Attorney General's 

Conference on Organized Crime. Therefore, Attorney 

General's Opinions Nos. O-1279, o-1134, O-2113 and 

o-2756 are expressly overruled. 
Hon. Wllllam Caven, page 2 (S-125) 

Ordlnarlly, traveling expenses Incurred by 

a cduntyyoffli?lal beyond the boundary of Texas cannot 

be paid for the reason that such official has no duty 

or authority to.go beyond the bounda 

3 

of the State. 

See: Att'y. Geti. Ops. Nos. v-525 (19 8) and v-520 (1948). 

However, at times It may be necessary for a county ettorney to go beyond the boundary of the State In order 

to Investigate en alleged crime committed within his 

jurisdiction. In that event, subdivision (b) of Article 

3899 would authorize the payment of his reasonable and 

necessary expenses. Whether the particular claim mentioned in your request was reasonable and necessary 

In the proper and legal conduct of the duties of your 

office Is a fact question which cannot be passed on 

by this office. 

SUMMARY 

Subdlvlslon (b) of Article 3899, 

Vernon's Civil Statutes, authorizes e 

county to pay all reasonable and necessary travel expenses of a county attorney compensated on a salary basis lncurred In the proper and legal conduct 

of his office. 

APPROVED: 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

County Af'falrs Mvlsion 

William W. Guild 

Reviewer 

Robert S. Trottl 

First Assistant 

John Ben Shepperd 

Attorney General 

JR:lm 

Yours very truly, 

JOHNBEN SHEPPH?u 

Attorney General of Texas 

Assistant
12/30/201 0 13:1 1 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^DM S 0003/00 6 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -^i--.,*.^—•• % #r*r ^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 'Jf'ClHlVtLI 

WASHINGTON, D.C. X-.fc-V«rfc« I W k.h ^ 

DEC 2 2 20B 

IN THE MATTER OF i EARING DOCKET 

FLIGHTSTAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) '::^ - - ^ 

DMSNO, FAA-2010-1077 '"', :::^^ § 

FAA CASE NO. not currently determinable 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin __ oQ ^ 

0 siSr" 

C3 

C O 

AGENCY MEMORANDUM ON VENUE 

Now Comes the Agency in accordance with the Administrative Law Judge's Procedural 

Order Dated November 30, 2010, and states the following: 

The Respondent has requested that the venue for this case be Jacksonville. Florida. 

The Agency has no objection to that location. The Agency has advised Respondent that 

it would file this as a joint response to the Judge's Order, but has been unable to 

confirm with Respondent that this is acceptable. 

Additionally, the parties are actively involved in settlement negotiations on this case, 

which would obviate the need to obtain hearing facilities. The Agency believes such 

negotiations should be resolved within the next 30 days, and recognizes its obligation to 

give timely notice to the Administrative Law Judge if those negotiations bear fruit. 

For the Agency 

M^^&. jSlenn L. Brown 

Senior Attorney 
12/30/2010 13:12 FAX 2024835142 FAA * DMS @1004/00e 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing pleading has been mailed this date by Certified Mail, Return 

Receipt Requested, to: 

Original and One Copy: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W, 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk 

AGC-430, Wilber Wright Building 

Suite 2W1000 

One COPY: 

Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue. S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E-12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Gregory S. Winton, Esq. 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

Facsimile 301 294 2525 

Dated this 16th day of December, 2010. 

FAA Great Lakes
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.710 What are the requirements for supplying power to aids to navigation?

The power of all navigation aids must be maintained, at all times, at or above the level recommended by the equipment's manufacturer.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 14 70

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Em an ue l L. Swin to n ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Han se ns Truc k S al va ge Inc .; U-Pi ck -It ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 20 , 20 16 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 7, 2 01 6 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d M URPHY, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Em an ue l Swin to n ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary 1 jud gm en t in hi s pr o se Tit le VII em pl oym en t-d is cri m in at io n act io n ag ai ns t hi s fo rm er
The Hon or ab le Howar d F. Sach s, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ctof M is so ur i.em

pl oyer. W e rev ie w de no vo , se e Sp ears v. Mi ss ou ri Dep ’t of Co rr. & Hum an Res ., 21 0 F.3 d 85 0, 85 3 (8 th Ci r. 20 00 ), an d we ag ree wit h th e di stric t co urt th at Swin to n’s cl ai m s of race -b as ed di sc riminat ory dis ch arg e an d ret al ia ti on are ti m e-b arre d be cau se he fil ed hi s la wsu it ov er se ve n m on th s la te
. See 42 U.S.C. § 20 00 e-5 (f)(1 ); Bal dwi n Cty . W el co m e Ctr. v. Bro wn, 46 6 U.S. 14 7, 14 9 (1 98 4) (p er cu ria m) (Tit le VII pl ai nt iff m

us t fil e su it wit hi n 90 da y s of rece iv in g rig ht -to -s ue le tt er from th e Equ al Em pl oym en t Opp ortu ni ty Co m m is si on ). Co nt rary to Swin to n’s as se rti on , th e 90 -d ay fil in g wi nd ow ap pl ie s eq ua ll y to cla im s o f rac e-b as edret al ia ti on . Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, August 22, 2011.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel Matter.

FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: August 15, 2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-21184 Filed 8-16-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 785.28 Involuntary attendance.

Attendance is not voluntary, of course, if it is required by the employer. It is not voluntary in fact if the employee is given to understand or led to believe that his present working conditions or the continuance of his employment would be adversely affected by nonattendance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 99N-5222] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

      ( print page 35100)    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Notice of a Claim for GRAS Exemption Based on a GRAS Determination” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 31, 2000 (65 FR 17284), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0342. The approval expires on May 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: May 26, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 00-13744 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F