alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.241 Mispillion River.

The draw of the Route 1/Rehoboth Blvd. Bridge, at mile 11.0, at Milford shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.

[CGD05-06-089, 72 FR 5619, Feb. 7, 2007, as amended by USCG-2011-0257, 76 FR 31837, June 2, 2011]
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

The Board of Directors 

Mercury General Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.333-62228) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-01583 and 333-125460) on Form S-8 of Mercury General Corporation of our reports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and all related financialstatement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury General Corporation. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

February 26, 2007
§ 140.105 Correction of deficiencies and hazards. ( a ) Lifesaving and fire fighting equipment which is found defective during an inspection by a Coast Guard marine inspector or a Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) inspector and which, in the opinion of the inspector, cannot be satisfactorily repaired must be so mutilated in the presence of the inspector that it cannot be used for the purpose for which it was originally intended. Lifesaving and fire fighting equipment subsequently determined to be unrepairable must be similarly mutilated in the presence of the person making that determination.
( b ) Any deficiency or hazard discovered during an inspection by a Coast Guard marine inspector or a BSEE inspector is reported to the unit's owner or operator, who shall have the deficiency or hazard corrected or eliminated as soon as practicable and within the period of time specified by the inspector.
( c ) Deficiencies and hazards discovered during an inspection of a fixed OCS facility under § 140.103(a) must be corrected or eliminated, if practicable, before the form CG-5432 is completed. Deficiencies and hazards that are not corrected or eliminated by the time the form is completed must be indicated on the form as “outstanding” and the form submitted to the appropriate BSEE District office. Upon receipt of a form CG-5432 indicating outstanding deficiencies or hazards, BSEE informs, by letter, the owner or operator of the fixed OCS facility of the deficiencies or hazards and the time period specified to correct or eliminate the deficiencies or hazards.
( d ) For lifesaving and fire fighting equipment deficiencies on fixed OCS facilities that cannot be corrected before the submission of form CG-5432, the owner or operator must contact the appropriate BSEE District Supervisor to request a time period for repair of the item. The owner or operator must include a description of the deficiency and the time period approved by BSEE for correction of the deficiency in the comment section of form CG-5432.
( e ) Where a deficiency or hazard remains uncorrected or uneliminated after the expiration of the time specified for correction or elimination, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection or BSEE (for deficiencies or hazards discovered by BSEE during an inspection of a fixed OCS facility), initiates appropriate enforcement measures.
[CGD84-098a, 53 FR 18981, May 26, 1988, as amended by USCG-2001-9045, 67 FR 5916, Feb. 7, 2002; USCG-2013-0797, 79 FR 36405, June 27, 2014]
### Exhaust Nozzle from an

airline’s Airbus A321 

### Elastomeric seal

Due to operating temperatures reaching

above 500 ° F, the seal has lost its elasticity

and the silicon has degraded to the point

of becoming hard and brittle. 

# The Problem With Elastomeric Seals

### Exhaust Nozzle Elastomeric seal

Streaking is visible all along the seal due to fluid leaking

f rom it. The leakage is caused by the seal’s failure to

provide a proper seal due to its silicon breakdown after

e xposure to temperatures above 500 ° F. 

# The Problem With Elastomeric Seals

### Exhaust Nozzle Elastomeric seal

Streaking is visible all along the seal due to fluid leaking

f rom it. The leakage is caused by the seal’s failure to

provide a proper seal due to its silicon breakdown after

e xposure to temperatures above 500 ° F. 

# The Problem With Elastomeric Seals
§ 110.73b Indian River at Vero Beach, Fla. ( a ) *Area A.* Beginning at a point located on the eastern shore of Fritz Is. at latitude 27°39′32.5′′ N., longitude 80°22′20.6′′ W. following the shoreline northward to the northwest point at latitude 27°39′46′′ N., longitude 80°22′25.9′′ W., thence due east to a point on Orchid Is. at approximately latitude 27°39′46′′ N., longitude 80°22′16.2′′ W., thence southerly along the shoreline of Orchid Is. to latitude 27°39′32.5′′ N., longitude 80°22′13.4′′ W., thence due west to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area B.* Beginning at a point located at the entrance channel marker No. 2 at latitude 27°39′12′′ N., longitude 80°22′17.3′′ W., thence northeasterly to channel marker No. 4 at latitude 27°39′21′′ N., longitude 80°22′15.8′′ W., thence due east to Orchid Is. at approximately latitude 27°39′21′′ N., longitude 80°22′11.8′′ W., thence southerly along the western shoreline of Orchid Is. to latitude 27°39′12′′ N., longitude 80°22′15.6′′ W., thence due west to the point of beginning.
( c ) Vessels shall be so anchored so that no part of the vessel obstructs the turning basin or channels adjacent to the special anchorage areas.
[CGD7-84-40, 51 FR 395, Jan. 6, 1986]
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### FEB 11 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
LAVERN BERRYHILL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. EDWARD EVANS, Respondent - Appellee. No. 96-6264 (D.C. No. CIV-95-700-T) (Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge; PORFILIO, and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Essentially for the reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge contained in the record, the certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) ; Lennox v. Evans , 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir. 1996). ENTERED FOR THE COURT John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2561-000]

Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Louisville Gas and Electric Company (LG&E)/Kentucky Utilities (KU) (hereinafter Companies), tendered for filing executed unilateral transmission service agreement with Amerada Hess Corporation. The agreement allows Amerada Hess to take non-firm point-to-point transmission service from LG&E/KU.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 88 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14140  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee (SC)-186 meeting to be held June 19-23, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036. 

The agenda will include: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review of Meeting Agenda; (3) Review and Approval of the Previous Meeting Minutes; (4) Review SC-186 Activity Reports for the following Working Groups (WG): (a) WG-1, Operations & Implementation; (b) WG-2, Traffic Information Services—Broadcast (TIS-B) which is a new activity to develop Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for TIS-B, (c) WG-3, 1090 MHz Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS); (d) WG-4, Application Technical Requirements; (5) Free Flight Select Committee Surveillance Working Group Update; (6) Review EUROCARE WG-51 Reports for Subgroups 1 and 2; (7) Review/Approve MOPS for 1090 Mhz Automatic Dependant Surveillance—Broadcast (RTCA Paper No. 145-00/SC186-152); (8) Review/Approve MOPS for Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (RTCA Paper NO. 146-00/SC186-153); (9) Review Revision to Terms of Reference for SC-186; (10) Review Action Items/Work Program; (12) Date and Location of Next Meeting; (13) Closing. 

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 25, 2000.

Janice L. Peters,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-13836 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1929

In re: ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:09-cr-00340-TLW-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Gene Trappier, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1929 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Gene Trappier petitions for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district 

court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for compassionate release. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act. 

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Mandamus relief is available only when there are 

no other means by which the relief sought could be granted and when the petitioner 

“show[s] that his right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 517 (4th Cir. 2003) (cleaned up); see Cheney, 542 U.S. at 380-

81. Unreasonable delay in the district court may be cause for mandamus relief. In re 

United States ex rel. Drummond, 886 F.3d 448, 450 (5th Cir. 2018) (collecting cases); cf.

Will v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co., 437 U.S. 655, 661-62 (1978) (“There can be no doubt that,

where a district court persistently and without reason refuses to adjudicate a case properly 

before it, the court of appeals may issue the writ.”). 

We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay by the district court 

so as to render any delay unreasonable. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.*

 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

* While we deny mandamus relief, we encourage the district court to act as 

expeditiously as possible in this matter.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1929 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1929 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of Michelle S. and Others, Alleged to be Neglected Children. Donald S., Appellant; Seneca County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

Submitted July 1, 1996;

decided September 12, 1996

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it was not timely taken. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Older Americans Month 2022 Posters
 OAM 2022 Poster
The following materials may be reproduced freely, electronically and in print.
8.5" x 11" Flyer for Web/Digital
18" x 24" Poster for Print






OAM Spanish flier: Envejeciendo como quiero
Los siguientes carteles podrán reproducirse libremente de manera electrónica o impresa.
8.5" x 11" Carteles en español para uso en la red o de manera digital
18" x 24" Carteles en español para impresión

                    *Last modified on 12/22/2022*
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
----

| ●   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ●   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:  August 4, 2009 | /s/ Russell K. GirlingRussell K. GirlingChairman, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorTC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner ofTC PipeLines, LP (Principal Executive Officer) |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
YOUR WINDOW TO THE WORLD WWW.PEACECORPS.GOV/WWS

FREE! Peace Corps

resources for your classroom

Access online videos and standards-based lesson plans

Correspond with a Peace Corps Volunteer

Download stories, letters, and

folk tales for language arts,

social studies, and

geography classes

>

>

>
§ 151.37 Obtaining an Attachment for NLSs to the IOPP Certificate and obtaining an NLS Certificate. ( a ) The Coast Guard or a classification society authorized under 46 CFR part 8 issues an Attachment for NLSs to the IOPP Certificate to an oceangoing ship to allow the carriage of a Category C oil-like NLS or a Category D oil-like NLS if the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) Except for ships that are not configured and are not equipped to ballast or wash cargo tanks while proceeding en route, the ship must have a Coast Guard approved monitor under § 157.12 that is approved for the cargoes that are desired to be carried.
( 2 ) Except as required by paragraph (a)(3), ships of 150 meters or less in length carrying a Category C oil-like NLS must meet the damage stability requirements applying to a Type III hull as provided by Regulation 14 (c) of Annex II.
( 3 ) A U.S. self propelled ship of 150 meters or less in length on a coastwise voyage carrying a Category C oil-like NLS must meet the damage stability requirements applying to a Type III hull as provided by 46 CFR part 172, subpart F except §§ 172.130 and 172.133.
( b ) Except as allowed in paragraph (c) of this section, the Coast Guard or a classification society authorized under 46 CFR part 8 issues an NLS Certificate endorsed to allow the oceangoing ship engaged in a foreign voyage to carry a Category D NLS listed in § 151.47 if the ship has— ( 1 ) An approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual and Cargo Record Book, both meeting the requirements in 46 CFR 153.490; and
( 2 ) A residue discharge system meeting 46 CFR 153.470, unless the approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual limits discharge of Category D NLS residue to the alternative provided by 46 CFR 153.1128(b).
( c ) The Coast Guard or a classification society authorized under 46 CFR part 8 issues a NLS Certificate with the statement that the vessel is prohibited from discharging NLS residues to the sea if the vessel does not meet 46 CFR 153.470 and 153.490 but meets 46 CFR subpart 98.31.
[CGD 75-124a, 48 FR 45709, Oct. 6, 1983, as amended by CGD 95-010, 62 FR 67532, Dec. 24, 1997]
#### § 146.101 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart apply only to manned OCS facilities except mobile offshore drilling units.
ex10.15

 

 Exhibit 10.15
 

 LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 $200,000 Date: December 1, 2010
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Entest Biomedical Inc., ("Borrower") promises to pay to the order of Venture Bridge Advisors ("Lender") the principal sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000), or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit of the Borrower by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It is the intent of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create a line of credit agreement between Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may borrow up to $ 200,000 from Lender. This agreement shall also be the terms and conditions of any and all borrowed amounts outstanding as of this date.
 

 INTEREST & PRINCIPAL: The unpaid principal of this line of credit shall bear simple interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated based on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances or payments made hereunder. Principal balance and accrued interest shall become due and payable in whole or in part at the demand of the Lender.
 

 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BORROWER
 

 Borrower  (a) is a corporation duly formed, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Nevada  and (b) has all requisite power and authority, and has all governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals necessary to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
 

 None of the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Borrower, or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby (a) constitute or will constitute a violation of the organizational documents of Borrower, (b) constitutes or will constitute a breach or violation of, or a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute such a default) under, any indenture, mortgage, deed of Borrower, loan agreement, lease or other agreement or instrument to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrower or any of its properties may be bound
 

 BORROWER:
 

 By: /s/ David Koos
 

 Its:CEO