alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 151.30 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, §§ 151.30 through 151.49 apply to each ship that— ( 1 ) Is operated under the authority of the United States and engages in international voyages;
( 2 ) Is operated under the authority of the United States and is certificated for ocean service;
( 3 ) Is operated under the authority of the United States and is certificated for coastwise service beyond three nautical miles from land;
( 4 ) Is operated under the authority of the United States and operates at any time seaward of the outermost boundary of the territorial sea of the United States as defined in § 2.22 of this chapter; or
( 5 ) Is operated under the authority of a country other than the United States while in the navigable waters of the United States, or while at a port or terminal under the jurisdiction of the United States.
( b ) Sections 151.30 through 151.49 do not apply to— ( 1 ) A tank barge whose certificate is endorsed by the Coast Guard for a limited short protected coastwise route if the barge is constructed and certificated primarily for service on an inland route;
( 2 ) A warship, naval auxiliary, or other ship owned or operated by a country when engaged in noncommercial service;
( 3 ) A Canadian or U.S. ship being operated exclusively on the Great Lakes of North America or their connecting and tributary waters;
( 4 ) A Canadian or U.S. ship being operated exclusively on the internal waters of the United States and Canada; or
( 5 ) Any other ship specifically excluded by MARPOL 73/78.
Note to § 151.30 ( b
)(4):
The term “internal waters” is defined in § 2.24 of this chapter.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18405, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by CGD 88-002A, 55 FR 18582, May 2, 1990; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35014, June 19, 2008]
§ 106.300 General. ( a ) The Facility Security Assessment (FSA) is a written document that is based on the collection of background information, the completion of an on-scene survey and an analysis of that information.
( b ) A single FSA may be performed and applied to more than one OCS facility to the extent they share physical characteristics, location, and operations.
( c ) Third parties may be used in any aspect of the FSA if they have the appropriate skills and if the Company Security Officer (CSO) reviews and accepts their work.
( d ) Those involved in a FSA must be able to draw upon expert assistance in the following areas, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Knowledge of current and anticipated security threats and patterns;
( 2 ) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
( 3 ) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of persons who are likely to threaten security;
( 4 ) Recognition of techniques used to circumvent security measures;
( 5 ) Methods used to cause a security incident;
( 6 ) Effects of dangerous substances and devices on structures and essential services;
( 7 ) OCS facility security requirements;
( 8 ) OCS facility and vessel interface business practices;
( 9 ) Contingency planning, emergency preparedness and response;
( 10 ) Physical security requirements;
( 11 ) Radio and telecommunications systems, including computer systems and networks;
( 12 ) Marine or civil engineering; and
( 13 ) OCS facility and vessel operations.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press

.



## District of Columbia
Court of Appeals

No. 1 7

- BG

- 1083

IN RE LAURENCE F. JOHNSON

201 7 D DN 239

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No

. 934398

BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese

, Associate Judge s
, and Steadman , Senior

Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED

– December 2 1 , 2017)

On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland by consent with a right to seek reinstatement after ninety days ; t his

court’s October 10 , 2017

, order temporarily suspending respondent and directing

h im to show cause why functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be imposed ; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline ; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court’s

show cause order but did timely file the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit

, it is

ORDERED that Laurence F. Johnson is hereby suspended from the practice

of law in the District of Columbia for ninety days, nunc pro tunc to October 10

, 2017, with reinstatement subject to a fitness requirement

. See In re Sibley , 990

A.2d 483

, 487

- 88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); In re

Cole , 809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal matters the “imposition of ident ical discipline should be close to automatic”)

. This discipline is concurrent with the discipline imposed by this court

in In re Johnson , 158 A.3d 913 (D.C. 2017).

PER CURIAM
#### Motteler v. Popham, et al.

(Decided December 9, 1915.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Fourth Division).

Appeal and Error. — Where there is no bill of evidence, and the pleadings support the judgment, it will be affirmed.

WILLIAM A. HECK and W. P. HILSMAN for appellant.

C. B. SEYMOUR for appellees.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

On this appeal, taken from a judgment in a common law action, there is no bill of evidence, and, as the pleadings support the judgment, it is affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TYRELL DESHAWN SANDERS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3231

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Thomas S. Reese, Senior Judge, 

and Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harvey R. Blau, Chief Executive Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period
ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

| |  | /s/HARVEY R. BLAUName: Harvey R. Blau
Date: February 9, 2005
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

I,
Michael Gorin, Chief Financial Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended December 31,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

| |  | /s/MICHAEL GORINName: Michael Gorin
Date: February 9, 2005
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

42

---



QuickLinks
State

Elder Abuse 

Prevention Ombudsman Total

Alabama $81,382 $224,842 $306,224

Alaska $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Arizona $96,445 $266,455 $362,900

Arkansas $51,986 $143,626 $195,612

California $511,990 $1,414,519 $1,926,509

Colorado $61,940 $171,128 $233,068

Connecticut $63,557 $175,594 $239,151

Delaware $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

District of Columbia $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Florida $378,726 $1,046,339 $1,425,065

Georgia $116,517 $321,911 $438,428

Hawaii $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Idaho $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Illinois $206,389 $570,209 $776,598

Indiana $104,308 $288,180 $392,488

Iowa $57,725 $159,481 $217,206

Kansas $47,572 $131,431 $179,003

Kentucky $71,877 $198,582 $270,459

Louisiana $72,679 $200,796 $273,475

Maine $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Maryland $86,575 $239,189 $325,764

Massachusetts $115,901 $320,211 $436,112

Michigan $169,608 $468,590 $638,198

Minnesota $82,476 $227,865 $310,341

Mississippi $48,080 $132,836 $180,916

Missouri $103,753 $286,649 $390,402

Montana $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Nebraska $31,001 $85,650 $116,651

Nevada $34,803 $96,155 $130,958

New Hampshire $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

New Jersey $153,158 $423,143 $576,301

New Mexico $30,349 $83,848 $114,197

New York $338,561 $935,372 $1,273,933

North Carolina $139,128 $384,381 $523,509

North Dakota $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Ohio $206,090 $569,383 $775,473

Oklahoma $63,574 $175,643 $239,217

Oregon $61,214 $169,121 $230,335

Pennsylvania $253,320 $699,871 $953,191

Rhode Island $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

South Carolina $70,996 $196,147 $267,143

South Dakota $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Tennessee $101,037 $279,143 $380,180

Texas $303,286 $837,915 $1,141,201

Utah $27,598 $76,247 $103,845

Vermont $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

Virginia $115,283 $318,504 $433,787

Washington $94,394 $260,789 $355,183

West Virginia $37,931 $104,795 $142,726

Wisconsin $95,841 $264,790 $360,631

Wyoming $25,578 $70,668 $96,246

American Samoa $3,197 $8,833 $12,030

Guam $12,789 $35,334 $48,123

Northern Mariana Islands $3,197 $8,833 $12,030

Puerto Rico $64,123 $177,159 $241,282

Virgin Islands $12,789 $35,334 $48,123

Total $5,115,659 $14,133,507 $19,249,166

Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2004 Final Allocation
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
August 1, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

_______________



### m 02-51363 Summary Calendar

_______________



### W ILLIAM 

### H. R OYSTER 

### ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS



### T HOMAS 

### E. W HITE 

### , S ECRETARY OF THE A RMY ,



### Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas


### m W-02-CV-201

_________________________

Before J OLLY , H IGGINBOTHAM , and S MITH , Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM : * William Royster appeals the dismissal of his title VII suit against the Secretary of the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has

(continued...) (...continued)determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.2

Ar my. The district court dismissed because White did not notify an equal employment opp ortunity counselor within forty-five days of the alleged discrimination.

The district court explained its reasons in a concise order dated October 11, 2002, and entered October 15, 2002. We agree with that court’s analysis. In addition to the fact that Royster changed his story from time to time,
to make it appear that he had sat isfied the deadline, indisputable facts show he was notified of his termination well in excess of fortyfive days before he took appropriate action to pursue the matter administratively.

Royster makes an equitable tolling argument. He did not raise that issue in the district court, so we will not consider it.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 99 (Monday, May 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 32096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12806]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1329-DR]

New Mexico; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-1329-DR), dated May 13, 
2000, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of New Mexico is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 13, 2000. Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    Chaves, DeBaca, Dona Ana, Eddy, Guadalupe, Lincoln, Otero, 
Sierra, and Socorro Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 00-12806 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```
§ 136.305 Notice of designation. ( a ) When information of an incident is received, the source or sources of the discharge or threat are designated, where possible and appropriate. If the designated source is a vessel or facility, the responsible party and the guarantor, if known, are notified by telephone, telefax, or other rapid means of that designation. The designation will be confirmed by a written Notice of Designation.
( b ) A Notice of Designation normally contains, to the extent known— ( 1 ) The name of the vessel or facility designated as the source;
( 2 ) The location, date, and time of the incident;
( 3 ) The type and quantity of oil involved;
( 4 ) The date of the designation;
( 5 ) The procedures for accepting or denying the designation; and
( 6 ) The name, address, telephone number, and, if available, telefax number of the responsible Federal official to whom further communication regarding the incident, advertisement of the incident, or denial of designation should be directed.
[USCG-91-035, 57 FR 36316, Aug. 12, 1992, as amended by USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37315, June 21, 2012]
December

Celebrate Religious Tolerance!

Promote a message of religious harmony during December. 

While your students are focusing on presents and holidays, teach 

them religious tolerance through World Wise Schools' primary 

sources and standards-based lessons on religious diversity.

World Religions

Check out:

o Destination: Kyrgyzstan and Nepal -Video and lesson plan emphasize religious 

diversity

o Learn about life in predominately Muslim countries

o Lesson plans on reducing religious prejudices
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Application of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-2007­ 0095 under 49 USC 40109 for exemption (U.S.-Israel authority for codesharing with El AI)

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FORRENEWAL OF EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to s document shouldbe sent to: VIRASB VAHIDI WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. SeniorVice President

- SeniorVice President

­ Planning Government Af irs American rlines, Inc. Ame canAirlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5634 1101 17th Street, N.W. DFW rport, Texas 75161 Washington, D.C. 20036 KENJI C. HASHIMOTO CARL B. NELSON, JR. Vice President

- Strategic Associate General Counsel Alliances AmericanAirl s, Inc. American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635 Washington, D.C. 20036 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 (202) 496 5647 carl.nelson@aa.com ROBERT A. WIRICK Director, Regulatory AmericanAirlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 (817) 963-0394 robert.wirick@aa.com
February 24, 2010BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Application of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 00T-OST-2007­ 0095 under 49 USC 40109 for exemption (U.S.-Israel authority for codesharing with El AI)

AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FORRENEWAL OF EXEMPTION

AmericanAirlines, Inc. hereby amends the renewal application it submitted in this docket on January 20, 2010, which requested exemption autho tybetween the United States and Israel. By this amendment, American seeks exemption authoritybetween the United States and Israel andbeyond, consistent with initial Notice ofAction Taken issued on March 28, 2008 (p. 2).Respectfully submitted,

CARL B. NELSON, JR. Associate General Counsel AmericanAirlines, Inc. February 24, 2010CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certi document byemail onthe
sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com scott.mcclain@delta.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com bkeiner@crowell.com mrosia@crowell.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com jeffrey.manley@united.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com robert.land@jetblue.com msinick@ssd.com cdonley@ssd.com anbird@fedex.com dvaughan@kelleydrye.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com lhalloway@crowell.com efaberman@wileyrein.com mroller@rollerbauer.com howard.kass@usairways.com amin.slocum@usairways.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com

February 24, 2010 have this day served the foregoing persons: jhill@dlalaw.com bill@mietuslaw.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com mcmillin@woa.com eskraft@jamhoff.com dpdean@jamhoff.com dkirstein@yklaw.com jyoung@yklaw.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov .moore@ustranscom.mil jim.ballough@faa.gov r@state.gov recohn@hhlaw.com zsrlaw.com lopmurphy.com lachter@starpower.net**anita.mosner@h~law.com** atlasair.com crowell.com russell.bailey@alpa.org
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Intelligent Transportation Society of America; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), US DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS 
AMERICA) will hold a meeting of its Coordinating Council meeting on 
Sunday, July 16, 2000. The following designations are made for each 
item: (A) is an ``action'' item; (I) is an ``information item;'' and 
(D) is a ``discussion'' item. The agenda includes the following: (1) 
Call to Order and Introductions (I); (2) Statements of Introductions 
(I); (3) Antitrust Statement (I); (4) Approval of Previous Minutes (A); 
(5) Federal Report (I/D); (6) President's Report (I); (7) Federal 
Communications Commission Advice on Dedicated Short Range Communication 
at 5.9GHz (A); (8) New Regional Institutions--What is the ITS America 
Role? (I/D); (9) Workshop Orientation (I/D); (10) Committee Reports 
(I); (11) Future Coordinating Council Meeting Dates (I/D); (12) 
Adjournment.

DATES: The Coordinating Council of ITS AMERICA will meet on Sunday, 
July 16, 2000, from 2 p.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern Standard time).

ADDRESSES: Radisson Hotel--Berkley Marina, 200 Marina Boulevard, 
Berkley, CA 94710 Phone: (510) 548-7920; Fax: (510) 548-7944.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Materials associated with this meeting 
may be examined at the offices of ITS AMERICA, 400 Virginia Avenue, 
SW., Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20024. Persons needing further 
information or to request to speak at this meeting should contact Larry 
Schulman at ITS AMERICA by telephone at (202) 484-4847, or by Fax at 
(202) 484-3483.
    The DOT contact is Kristy Frizzell, FHWA, HOIT, Washington, D.C. 
20590, (202) 366-9536. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., 
Monday through Friday, except for legal holidays.
(23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48)

    Issued on: Wednesday, May 24, 2000.
Jeffrey Paniati,
Deputy Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 00-13698 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
**1995-  oil_crops_outlook_01.13.95oil_crops_outlook_02.13.95oil_crops_outlook_03.13.95oil_crops_outlook_04.12.95oil_crops_outlook_05.12.95oil_crops_outlook_06.13.95oil_crops_outlook_07.13.95oil_crops_outlook_08.14.95oil_crops_outlook_09.13.95oil_crops_outlook_10.12.95oil_crops_outlook_11.13.95oil_crops_outlook_12.13.95

**
STATE OF

LGBTQ+

AGING

SAGE works to achieve a high quality of life for LGBTQ+ older people.

To help do so, we are starting A NEW NATIONAL SURVEY every

other year to better understand the current experiences, needs, and

resiliencies of LGBTQ+ older people in the U.S.

WHO WHAT WHEN

If you are 50 years 30-minute The survey is

or older AND identify survey online or OPEN NOW through

as LGBTQ+, we want over the phone mid-February 2024

to hear from you!

Visit the link to start the survey!

https://www.sageusa.org/

SOLA2023

DESIGN BY DPI.NYC
§ 155.1015 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, this subpart applies to each vessel that is constructed or adapted to carry, or that carries, oil in bulk as cargo or oil cargo residue, and that— ( 1 ) Is a vessel of the United States;
( 2 ) Operates on the navigable waters of the United States; or
( 3 ) Transfers oil in a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
( b ) This subpart also applies to vessels which engage in oil lightering operations in the marine environment beyond the baseline from which the territorial sea is measured, when the cargo lightered is destined for a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to the following types of vessels: ( 1 ) Public vessels and vessels deemed public vessels under 14 U.S.C. 3908.
( 2 ) Vessels that, although constructed or adapted to carry oil in bulk as cargo or oil cargo residue, are not storing or carrying oil in bulk as cargo or oil cargo residue.
( 3 ) Dedicated response vessels when conducting response operations.
( 4 ) Vessels of opportunity when conducting response operations in a response area.
( 5 ) Offshore supply vessels as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101.
( 6 ) Fishing or fishing tender vessels as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101 of not more than 750 gross tons when engaged only in the fishing industry.
( 7 ) Foreign-flag vessels engaged in innocent passage through the territorial sea or transit passage through a strait used for international navigation, unless bound for or departing from a port or place of the United States.
( 8 ) Vessels carrying oil as a secondary cargo and measuring 400 gross tons or greater.
( d ) Vessels covered by this subpart that are not operating within the navigable waters or the exclusive economic zone of the United States must meet all requirements of this subpart except for— ( 1 ) Identifying and ensuring, through contract or other approved means, the availability of response resources including the shore-based spill management team;
( 2 ) Providing the geographic-specific appendices required in § 155.1035, 155.1040, or 155.1045, as appropriate; and
( 3 ) Identifying and designating a qualified individual and alternate qualified individual required in § 155.1026.
Note to § 155.1015 :
Response plan requirements for nontank vessels are found in subpart J of this part.
[CGD 91-034, 61 FR 1081, Jan. 12, 1996, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55572, Nov. 2, 2001; USCG-2008-1070, 78 FR 60122, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58280, Sept. 18, 2020]