alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7588

HERMAN E. HARSTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

P. L. HUFFMAN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-1294-R)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 30, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman E. Harston, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court's dismissal of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Appellant's motion for

a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. Harston v. Huffman, No. CA95-1294-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for

production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
§ 147.841 Atlantis Semi-Submersible safety zone. ( a ) *Description.* Atlantis Semi-Submersible, Green Canyon 787 (GC 787), located at position 27°11′44′′ N, 90°01′37′′ W. The area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the structure's outer edge is a safety zone. These coordinates are based upon [NAD 83].
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel;
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[CGD08-05-015, 70 FR 43772, July 29, 2005]
----

**EXHIBIT 31.1**

Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer 

I, Yanlin Han, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

|                          |                         |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
| Date:  May 14, 2008 | /s/ Yanlin Han          |
|                     | Yanlin Han              |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 68 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 68

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL BY THE JOINT CONGRESSIONAL 
              COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES.

    The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on January 20, 2009, by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted 
for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-
elect of the United States.

            Passed the Senate February 8 (legislative day, February 6), 
      2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 68

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol by the Joint 
            Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies.
```
#### § 118.5 Penalty for failure to maintain.

Any person required to maintain lights and other signals upon any bridge or abutment over or in the navigable waters of the United States who fails or refuses to maintain such lights and other signals, or to obey any of the lawful rules and regulations relating to the same is subject to a penalty as provided in 14 U.S.C. 544.

[CGD 75-046, 40 FR 24898, June 11, 1975, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58279, Sept. 18, 2020]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 263 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in State of Iowa v. Chester 

Guinn, Brian David Terrell, Dixie Jenness Webb, Kathleen McQuillen, 

and Elton Lloyd Davis. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in State 

of Iowa v. Chester Guinn, Brian David Terrell, Dixie 

Jenness Webb, Kathleen McQuillen, and Elton Lloyd 

Davis. 

Whereas, in the cases of State of Iowa v. Chester Guinn 

(SMAC288541), Brian David Terrell (SMAC288544), 

Dixie Jenness Webb (SMAC288545), Kathleen McQuillen 

(SMAC288543), and Elton Lloyd Davis (SMAC288539), 

pending in Iowa District Court for Polk County in Des 

Moines, Iowa, testimony has been requested from Robert 

Renaud and Janice Goode, employees in the office of 

Senator Chuck Grassley; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 


bajohnson on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

SRES 263 ATS 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Robert Renaud and Janice Goode, are 

2 authorized to testify in the cases of State of Iowa v. Ches3 ter Guinn, Brian David Terrell, Dixie Jenness Webb, 

4 Kathleen McQuillen, and Elton Lloyd Davis, except con5 cerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Robert Renaud and Janice Goode in the actions 

8 referenced in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC61 with BILLS
|                                           |  |
|-------------------------------------------|--|
| **Division of Bird Habitat Conservation** |
|                                           |

Proposal Application OverviewNew Proposal ScoresGrants Administration StandardsProjects By dateProjects By LocationNorth American Wetlands Conservation CouncilNAWCA LegislationBiennial Reports

**Deadlines**

U.S. Standard Grants Deadline: March 6, and July 31, 2009.

**Purpose and Scope**

 The U.S. Standard Grants Program is a competitive, matching grants program  that supports public-private partnerships carrying out projects in the United  States that further the goals of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act  (Act). These projects must involve long-term protection,  restoration, and/or enhancement of wetlands and associated uplands habitatsfor the benefit of all wetlands-associated migratory birds.

**History**

 The U.S. Standard Grants Program began supporting projects in the United  States in 1990, shortly after the North American Wetlands Conservation Act  of 1989 was passed. This program has been receiving 50 percent of the total  available funding for Act-supported projects each fiscal year. In recent years,this amount has been approximately $40 million annually.

**Process**

 Applicants submit project proposals to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's  Division of Bird Habitat Conservation (Division) for either of the program's  two funding cycles per year. After a preliminary review by Division staff,  Joint Venture Coordinators, and North  American Wetlands Conservation Council  (Council) staff, eligible proposals are presented to the Council. The Council  further reviews, ranks, and recommends projects to the Migratory  Bird Conservation Commission for final funding approval. The Division is responsible for administeringthe grants for the approved projects.

**Current Funding**

Total funding for the U.S. Standard Grants Program in FY 2009 is $48.8 million.

**Accomplishments**

From September 1990 through March 2009, more than 3,850 partners have  been involved in 732 Act-supported projects in the United States. Partners  have added more than $1.47 billion in  matching funds and $892.3 million in nonmatching funds to the more than $568.5  million in grants they have received to conserve approximately 6.59 million  acres of wetlands and associatedhabitats across the country.

**Contacts**

 Contact the Joint Venture    Coordinator in your project area for assistance  with developing a project proposal, for information about how proposals are  ranked, and/or for guidance on Endangered Species Act, National EnvironmentalPolicy Act, and National Historic Preservation Act compliance requirements. For      general program information, contact the U.S. Standard Grants Program   Proposal Coordinators:David Buie (david_buie@fws.gov),  (301) 497-5870, or Bonnie Gaukler (bonnie_j -gaukler@fws.gov), (703) 358-2017.

```
/birdhabitat/Grants/NAWCA/Standard/US/index.shtm was last updated 03/12/09 07:59:22
```

```
Home - FWS - Duck Stamp - Contact Us - Privacy
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT DUSAN BABIC, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-1325 December 8, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pat Siracusa, Judge. Jacob Grollman of Grollman Law P.A., Bradenton, for Appellant. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
§ 147.811 Ram-Powell Tension Leg Platform safety zone. ( a ) *Description.* The Ram-Powell Tension Leg Platform (Ram-Powell TLP) is located at position 29°03′52.2′′ N, 88°05′30′′ W with two supply boat mooring buoys at positions 29°03′52.2′′ N, 88°05′12.6′′ W (Northeast) and 29°03′28.2′′ N, 88°05′10.2′′ W (Southeast). The area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the structure's outer edge and the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) of each of the supply boat mooring buoys is a safety zone.
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except: ( 1 ) An attending vessel;
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[CGD 08-99-023, 65 FR 16825, Mar. 30, 2000]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# Time and Date:

 10 a.m., Wednesday, May 31, 2000. 

# Place:

 Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information:

 You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: May 24, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-13425 Filed 3-24-00; 12:58 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONE HENRY POINDEXTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:97-cr-00079-JCC-1; 3:11-cv-00175-REP)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antone Henry Poindexter, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley 

Miller, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antone Henry Poindexter appeals the district court’s 

order addressing Poindexter’s December 1, 2010, letter. In its 

order, the district court declined to resentence Poindexter but 

it did order the Probation Office to amend Poindexter’s 

presentence report to account for the fact that a prior New 

Jersey conviction had been vacated. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Poindexter’s 

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Poindexter, Nos. 

3:97-cr-00079-JCC-1; 3:11-cv-00175-REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2011). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                                                                            
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: :  August 14, 2008 |  | ___/s/ Yanlin Han      __________________Yanlin Han
Chief Executive Officer
|Dated: :  August 14, 2008 |  | ___/s/  Garry Wong               _______
Garry Wong
Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****National WaterProgram guidance.**** 
SuDocNumber:EP2.43:
ItemNumber:0473-A-29(online), 0473-A-30 (online)
CGPsystem Number:000636886
 
Current
 
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016-2017
2017
 **
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.412 How many fire axes are needed?

Each manned deepwater port must have at least two fire axes as required by 46 CFR 108.499.
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.535 What are the requirements for rotating beacons on platforms? In addition to obstruction lights, the tallest platform of a deepwater port must have a lit rotating beacon that distinguishes the deepwater port from other surrounding offshore structures. The beacon must: ( a ) Have an effective intensity of at least 15,000 candela;
( b ) Flash at least once every 20 seconds;
( c ) Provide a white light signal;
( d ) Operate in wind speeds of up to 100 knots at a rotation rate that is within 6 percent of the operating speed displayed on the beacon;
( e ) Have one or more leveling indicators permanently attached to the light, each with an accuracy of ±0.25 ° or better; and
( f ) Be located: ( 1 ) At least 60 feet (about 18.3 meters) above mean high water;
( 2 ) Where the structure of the platform, or equipment mounted on the platform, does not obstruct the light in any direction; and
( 3 ) So that it is visible all around the horizon.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3418

___________________________

Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

David Fleming; David Fleming, as Personal Representative of the Estate of

Carmeletta Fleming, Deceased

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: May 23, 2013

Filed: June 3, 2013 (Corrected June 5, 2013)

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (Morgan Keegan) appeals the district

court’s denial of its motion to vacate an arbitration award. After careful review of

1

the record, see Medicine Shoppe Int’l, Inc. v. Turner Invs., Inc., 614 F.3d 485, 488

(8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), and considering the parties’ submissions on

appeal, we agree with the district court that Morgan Keegan was not entitled to the

relief sought for the reasons explained in the court’s opinion. We conclude as well

that the district court gave adequate consideration to all of Morgan Keegan’s

arguments, including its public-policy argument, which was premised on Morgan

Keegan's claim the parties entered into a settlement agreement. The arbitration panel

heard evidence on the question of whether the parties had settled their dispute and

concluded there was no valid settlement agreement. The factual determination there

was no settlement agreement is not reviewable under the Federal Arbitration Act.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.671 Upper Mississippi River. ( a ) The draws of all bridges between Lock and Dam No. 14, mile 493.3, and Lock and Dam No. 2, mile 815.2, shall open on signal; except that, from on or about December 15 through the last day of February, the draws shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
( b ) The draws of all bridges between Lock and Dam No. 2, mile 815.2 and Lock and Dam No. 1, mile 847.6, shall open on signal; except that, from on or about December 15 through the last day of February, the draws shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
[USCG-2016-0561, 82 FR 55322, Nov. 21, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.1103 Upper Mississippi River.

See § 117.671, Upper Mississippi River, listed under Minnesota.

[CGD 92-015, 57 FR 37880, Aug. 21, 1992]