alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000002589
<NAME> STEVE R HEDBERG
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              50
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,139
<PP&E>                                          13,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           766
<OTHER-SE>                                         261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,557
<SALES>                                          7,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,054
<CGS>                                            5,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     70
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        70
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
ADMINISTRATION FOR 

COMMUNITY LIVING

IMPROVING THE LIVES OF OLDER ADULTS AND PEOPLE WITH 

DISABILITIES THROUGH SERVICES, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATION

WHAT IS COMMUNITY LIVING? 

OLDER ADULTS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES HAVE THE 

SAME OPPORTUNITIES AS EVERYONE ELSE TO:

CHOOSE WHERE TO LIVE

EARN A LIVING

PARTICIPATE IN SOCIETY

MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR LIVES

WHY IS COMMUNITY LIVING IMPORTANT? 

PEOPLE 

PREFER IT

IT COSTS 

LESS

IT’S A LEGAL 

RIGHT

EVERYONE BENEFITS 

WHEN EVERYONE 

CAN CONTRIBUTE

HOW DOES ACL SUPPORT COMMUNITY LIVING?

FUNDS SERVICES

THAT HELP PEOPLE LIVE 

INDEPENDENTLY

INVESTS IN RESEARCH, 

INNOVATION, TRAINING, 

AND EDUCATION

ADVOCATES FOR 

PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 

AND OLDER ADULTS 

WHO ARE ACL’S PARTNERS?

NATIONWIDE AGING 

AND DISABILITY 

NETWORKS

STATES, TRIBES, 

AND 

COMMUNITIES

COLLEGES 

AND 

UNIVERSITIES

NONPROFIT, 

FAITH-BASED, 

AND INDUSTRY 

PARTNERS

OTHER FEDERAL 

AGENCIES
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1130

DORIS R. MURRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

CHARLES WILSON; JAMES WALL, SR.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-95-121-WMN)

Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doris R. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Peter David Guattery, WHITEFORD,

TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Doris R. Murray appeals the district court's order granting

summary judgment to her former employer, the University of Maryland

Medical System, in Murray's pro se action alleging that she was

unlawfully retaliated against for having availed herself of the

dispute resolution process accorded her by Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Murray v. University

of Maryland Med. Sys., No. CA-95-121-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 17, 1997).

We deny Murray's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 150/5320-5C - Surface Drainage Design (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5320-5C
- Title
- Surface Drainage Design
- Date cancelled
- 2013-08-15
- Cancellation notes
- AC 150/5320-5D
- Date issued
- 2006-09-29
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Engineering Division 
- Description
-  	Provides guidance for engineers, airport managers, and the public in the design and maintenance of airport surface drainage systems. Combines existing surface drainage topics covered in different agency manuals into one Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) document that will serve as the design and analysis standard for surface drainage for FAA and the Department of Defense. ***Consolidated file contains Change 1.***	The AC is 12.7 MB (see Complete file). Because of its size, the AC has been broken into several parts to make it easier to download (see Parts 1-13). 
- Content
-    -  150/5320-5C (Complete)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 1: Coversheet, Forward, Table of Contents)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 2: Chapters 1-2)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 3: Chapter 3)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 4: Chapter 4 (A))  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 5: Chapter 4 (B))  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 6: Chapter 4 (C))  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 7: Chapters 5-6)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 8: Chapters 7-8)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 9: Chapters 9-10)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 10: Chapters 11-12)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 11: Glossary, Appendix A)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 12: Appendix B)  (PDF) 
  -  150/5320-5C (Part 13: Appendices C-G, Index)  (PDF) 
- Changes
-  ChangesChangeTitleDate1Change 1 - Surface Drainage Design												Provides guidance about the design and construction of subsurface drainage facilities for paved runways, taxiways, and aprons where the water can be drained from the pavement structure by gravity flow. 													-  150/5320-5C Change 1  (PDF) 
-  150/5320-5C Change 1  (MS Word) 
2008-09-30 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated February 10, 2000, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on February 17, 2000, (65 FR 8207), Noramco of Delaware, Inc., Division of McNeilab, Inc., which has changed its name to Noramco of Delaware, Inc., Division of Ortho-McNeil, Inc., 500 Old Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleCodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
II( print page 34499)Hydrocodone (9193)
IIMorphone (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
II
 The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances for distribution to its customers as bulk product. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Noramco of Delaware, Inc. to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Noramco of Delaware, Inc. on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registsration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's records, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted. Dated: May 19, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-13435  Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### § 779.323 Particular industry.

In order to determine whether a sale or service is recognized as a retail sale or service in the “particular industry” it is necessary to identify the “particular” industry to which the sale or service belongs. Some situations are clear and present no difficulty. The sale of clothes, for example, belongs to the clothing industry and the sale of ice belongs to the ice industry. In other situations, a sale or service is not so easily earmarked and a wide area of overlapping exists. Household appliances are sold by public utilities as well as by department stores and by stores specializing in the sale of such goods; and tires are sold by manufacturers' outlets, by independent tire dealers and by other types of outlets. In these cases, a fair determination as to whether a sale or service is recognized as retail in the “particular” industry may be made by giving to the term “industry” its broad statutory definition as a “group of industries” and thus including all industries wherein a significant quantity of the particular product or service is sold. For example, in determining whether a sale of lumber is a retail sale, it is the recognition the sale of lumber occupies in the lumber industry generally which decides its character rather than the recognition such sales occupies in any branch of that industry.
ACL Protection and Advocacy: Traumatic Brain Injury Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2020 Final Allocation

8/6/2020

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy: 

Traumatic Brain 

Injury (PATBI)

Alabama $55,729

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $73,111

Arkansas $50,000

California $319,615

Colorado $61,876

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $180,644

Georgia $98,593

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $115,503

Indiana $69,460

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $52,536

Louisiana $53,994

Maine $50,000

Maryland $64,518

Massachusetts $71,060

Michigan $94,608

Minnesota $61,234

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $65,156

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $86,331

New Mexico $50,000

New York $167,270

North Carolina $97,559

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $107,499

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,422

Pennsylvania $116,005

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $57,222

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $70,054

Texas $236,989

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $83,357

Washington $75,881

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $62,774

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $20,000

Guam $20,000

Northern Mariana Islands $20,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $20,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $20,000

TOTAL $3,999,000
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-12-00073-CR

BILLY JOE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0518110

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Billy Joe Smith was on deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child. The State filed a motion for adjudication and revocation, 

alleging that Smith failed to pay fees, fines, and costs assessed as part of his supervision and that 

he violated the terms and conditions of his supervision by being in the direct presence of or 

having personal contact with children. The trial court found the allegations true, adjudicated him 

guilty, and sentenced him to life in prison. 

Based on the reasoning and analysis in our opinion in cause number 06-12-00065-CR, 

issued on even date herewith, we overrule Smith’s points of error.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment and sentence. 

Bailey C. Moseley 

Justice

Date Submitted: January 10, 2013

Date Decided: January 23, 2013

Do Not Publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Tuesday, June 27, 2000.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Lobby Level Hearing Room.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Public Hearing on Regulatory Framework/Trading Facilities.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-14033  Filed 5-31-00; 3:47 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 160

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<PAGE>
                                        EXHIBIT (24)


                      POWER OF ATTORNEY
                      -----------------

       Each of the undersigned directors of Massachusetts Electric Company
  (the "Company"), individually as a director of the Company, hereby
  constitutes and appoints John G. Cochrane, Robert King Wulff, and
  Geraldine M. Zipser, individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on
  behalf of the undersigned the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for
  the year ended December 31, 1997, to be filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission, and to execute any appropriate amendment or
  amendments thereto as may be required by law.
  Dated this 18th day of March, 1998.

  s/Cheryl A. LaFleur                s/Christopher E. Root
  _________________________          _________________________
  Cheryl A. LaFleur                  Christopher E. Root


  s/Robert L. McCabe                 s/Richard P. Sergel
  _________________________          _________________________
  Robert L. McCabe                   Richard P. Sergel


  s/Lydia M. Pastuszek               s/Dennis E. Snay
  _________________________          _________________________
  Lydia M. Pastuszek                 Dennis E. Snay


  s/Lawrence J. Reilly
  _________________________
  Lawrence J. Reilly
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas
Corp. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Winner, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|             |  |  |  |  |  |                  |  |                                                
|------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|             |  |  |  | 
|             |  |  |  |  |  |                  |  | /s/ Philip S. Winner                           
|May 15, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | Philip S. Winner
|             |  |  |  |  |  |                  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
FAA Home
Regulations & Policies
Advisory Circulars (ACs)

# AC 150/5345-53C - Airport Lighting Equipment Certification Program (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5345-53C
- Title
- Airport Lighting Equipment Certification Program
- Date cancelled
- 2012-09-26
- Cancellation notes
- AC 150/5345-53D
- Date issued
- 2005-09-30
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Engineering Division 
- Description
-  	Describes the Airport Lighting Equipment Certification Program (ALECP). **See also the Addendum and an explanation of FAA's interim Non-Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Parts Certification Program.** 
- Content
-    -  150/5345-53C  (PDF) 
  -  Addendum (September 2012) to AC 150/5345-53C  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current ACs
      - Cancelled ACs
      - Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs

## Export All

      - Current ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled ACs  (CSV)

## Contact Information

      - Advisory Circulars Administrator
      - Other Points of Contact  (MS Excel)
#### KNUTSON MORTGAGE CORPORATION *v.*MIHALY J. SALATA ET AL.

(AC 19732)

Lavery, Schailer and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs January 26

officially released February 15, 2000

*910Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 116
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 116 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35012, June 19, 2008 and USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 49410, Aug. 13, 2010.

§ 116.45 Submission of bids, approval of award, guaranty of cost, and partial payments for bridges eligible for funding under the Truman-Hobbs Act. ( a ) Once the plans and specifications for a bridge eligible for funding under the Truman-Hobbs Act have been approved, the bridge owner must take bids for the alteration of the bridge consistent with the approved plans and specifications. Those bids must then be submitted to the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs for approval.
( b ) After the bridge owner submits the guaranty of cost required by 33 U.S.C. 515, the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs authorizes the owner to award the contract.
( c ) Partial payments of the government's costs are authorized as the work progresses to the extent that funds have been appropriated.
[CGD 91-063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33664, June 28, 1996; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38433, July 7, 2014]
§ 125.15 Access to waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein. ( a ) The Commandant will, from time to time, direct Captains of the Port of certain ports to prevent access of persons who do not possess one or more of the identification credentials listed in § 125.09 to those waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein, where the following shipping activities are conducted: ( 1 ) Those vital to the Military Defense Assistance Program.
( 2 ) Those pertaining to the support of U.S. military operations.
( 3 ) Those pertaining to loading and unloading explosives and other dangerous cargo.
( 4 ) Those essential to the interests of national security and defense, to prevent loss, damage or injury, or to insure the observance of rights and obligations of the United States.
( b ) No person who does not possess one of the identification credentials aforesaid shall enter or remain in such facilities, or port or harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein.
( c ) The Captain of the Port shall give local public notice of the restriction of access to waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft therein, as far in advance as practicable, and shall cause such facilities and areas to be suitably marked as to such restriction.
[CGFR 56-15, 21 FR 2940, May 3, 1956, as amended by CGFR 58-43, 23 FR 8542, Nov. 1, 1958]