alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




                                      -1-


<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 8.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




1.       ALB Holdings Ltd.

         The Company  holds a 100%  interest  in ALB  Holdings  Ltd.,  which was
         incorporated  under the laws of British  Columbia,  Canada, on December
         10, 2003.

2.       Mina Real Mexico S.A. de C.V.

         The Company  directly  owns a 51%  interest in Mina Real Mexico S.A. de
         C.V., which was incorporated in Mexico on December 2, 2006. Through its
         100% interest in ALB Holdings  Ltd., the Company  indirectly  holds the
         remaining 49% interest in Mina Real Mexico S.A. de C.V.

3.       Minera Nayarit S.A. de C.V.

         The Company holds a 60% interest in Minera Nayarit S.A. de C.V.,  which
         was incorporated April 29, 2004 in Mexico.  Minera Nayarit S.A. de C.V.
         is dormant.

4.       Compania Minera Santa Fe de C.V.

         The Company holds a 70% ownership  interest in Compania Minera Santa Fe
         de C.V., which was incorporated June 1, 2007 in Mexico.




                                      -2-

<PAGE>
# B-2 NF-Comp full
ABEL ACOSTA,CLERK



## SUPREMECRT.BLDING. 201 W."l4TH ST.RM.106 P.O.BOX 12308 AUSTIN,TX 78711-2308 

# ^SC/18--0I
MARCH 16,2015

RE:FOR COPY'OF MY LAST 1107 SUBMITTED 

### ON 10-1-12.(COVERONLY). WRIT NO.:WR-78,478-01 DEAR MR.ACOSTA, I,JUAN MUNOZ,TDCJ NO.1467005,AM HOUSED HERE IN THE DOLPH BRISCOE UNIT IN 

### DILLEY,TX.I AM REQUESTING OF YOUR ASSISTANCE IN THIS IMPORTANT MATTER.ALL I AM 

### REQUESTING IS FORACOPYOF THE COVEROF MY 1107 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,REASON BEING IS THAT I NEED TO SEE WHAT BOX WAS MARKED OF WHETHER CHALLENGING THE CONVI CTION OR SENTENCING. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND TAKING THE TIME IN YOUR ALREADY BUSY DAY TO ASSIST ME IN THIS VERY IMPORTANT MATTER.MAY GOD BLESS YOU ABUNDANTLY...
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,


### PROSE/SOJANMUNO; 

## ^ej—Ne-ri467oo5 DOLPH BRISCOE UNIT 1459 W.HWY.85 DILLEY,TX 78017 FRIO COUNTY



# mwIV$ 

# M)aABW».cl*k
§ 452.71 Inspection of membership lists. ( a ) Each bona fide candidate for office has a right, once within 30 days prior to any election in which he is a candidate, to inspect a list containing the names and last known addresses of all members of the labor organization who are subject to a collective bargaining agreement requiring membership therein as a condition of employment. The right of inspection does not include the right to copy the list but does include the right to compare it with a personal list of members. It is the intent of the Act that such membership lists be made available for inspection at the candidates' option any time within the 30-day period. The list is not required to be maintained continuously and may be compiled immediately before each election. The form in which the list is to be maintained is not specified by the Act. Thus, a card index system may satisfy the requirements of the Act. The list may be organized alphabetically or geographically, or by local in a national or international labor organization.
( b ) It is the duty of the labor organization and its officers to refrain from discrimination in favor of or against any candidate with respect to the use of lists of members. Thus, if a union permits any candidate to use such lists in any way other than the right of inspection granted by the Act, it must inform all candidates of the availability of the list for that purpose and accord the same privilege to all candidates who request it. Such privileges may include permitting inspection of the list where members are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement requiring membership as a condition of employment, inspecting the list more than once, or copying the list.
[38 FR 18324, July 9, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985]
§ 127.313 Bulk storage. ( a ) The operator must ensure that only the following flammable materials are stored in the marine transfer area for LNG: ( 1 ) LNG.
( 2 ) LPG.
( 3 ) Vessel fuel.
( 4 ) Oily waste from vessels.
( 5 ) Solvents, lubricants, paints, and other fuels in the amount used for one day's operations and maintenance.
( b ) Flammable liquids must be stored in accordance with NFPA 30 (incorporated by reference, see § 127.003).
[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995; USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# Date and  Time:

June 13, 2000; 9:00 a.m.

# Place:

RFE/RL, Inc., Room 546, Vinohradska 1, 110 00 Prague 1, Prague, Czech Republic.

# Closed Meeting:

The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)). In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).

# Contact Person for more Information:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or John Lindburg at (202) 401-3736.

Dated: June 1, 2000.

John A. Lindburg,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 00-14151  Filed 6-1-00; 2:05 pm]

BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Sun Trust Mortgage, Inc.
Post Office Box 26149
Richmond, VA. 23260-6149
1-800-634-7928

(LOGO) SUNTRUST

February 10,2000

Arthur Andersen LLP
133 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta,GA 30303

Dear Sirs:

As of and for the  year  ended  December  31,1999,Sun  Trust  Mortgage,Inc.  has
complied in all  materials  respects  with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers   Association  of  America's   Uniform  Single
Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period,  Sun
Trust  Mortgage,Inc.  had in effect a fidelty  bond and  errors  and  ommissions
policy in the amounts of $100,000,000 and $28,500,0000 respectively.

Sincerely,
Ralph B. Carrigan

Executive Vice President
§ 779.262 Excise taxes at the retail level. ( a ) Federal excise taxes are imposed at the retail level on highway vehicle fuels other than gasoline under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 4041. Such excise taxes are levied at the retail level on any liquid fuel sold for use, or used in a diesel-powered highway vehicle. A similar tax is imposed on the sale of such special motor fuels as benzene and liquefied petroleum gas when used as a motor fuel. To the extent that these taxes are separately stated to the customer, they may be excluded from gross volume of sales. The extent to which State taxes are levied at the retail level, and thus excludable when separately stated, depends, of course, upon the law of the State concerned. However, as a general rule, State, county, and municipal sales taxes are levied at the retail level, and to the extent that they are separately stated, may be excluded. All State excise taxes on gasoline are, for purposes of section 3(s), taxes levied at the retail level, which, if separately stated, may be excluded.
( b ) The circumstances surrounding the levying and collection of the Federal excise taxes on gasoline, tires, and inner tubes reflect that, although they are listed under the title of “Manufacturers Excise Taxes,” they are, in practical operation, taxes “at the retail level.” Federal excise taxes on gasoline, tires, and inner tubes, when “separately stated,” may therefore be excluded in computing the annual gross volume of an enterprise for the purpose of determining coverage under section 3(s)(1) of the Act and section 13(a)(2) for purposes of applying the $250,000 test for determining the retail and service establishment exemption of an establishment in a covered enterprise.
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.172 Limitations on grades of crude oil carried.

If a tank vessel having a COW system meeting § 157.10a(a)(2) or § 157.10c(b)(2) does not have segregated ballast tanks or dedicated clean ballast tanks that meet § 157.10c(c)(2), the owner, operator, and master shall ensure that the vessel carries only the grades of crude oil that can be used for crude oil washing.

[CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11628, Mar. 22, 1985]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Communication Disorders Review Committee.
    Date: March 1-2, 2000.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007-
3701.
    Contact Person: Melissa Stick, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NIDCD/
NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 13, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1412 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                             CELEBRATE EXPRESS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Celebrate Express, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Green, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

 /s/ Kevin A. Green
------------------------------
Kevin A. Green
Chief Executive Officer
August 28, 2006
# Individual Clients Served
#### Commonwealth for Catlett *vs*Hughes, &c.

Covenant.

*Case*95.

Error to the Union Circuit.

*Pleadings. Relator. Demurrers.*

Upon gen eral demurrer, if there be a good count or a good breach the demurrer should be overruled.

The person who sues as relator, must have the legal right, a right merely equitable is not sufficient: *Hawkins*vs *Commonwealth,*(3 *Marsh.*389.)

*June*14.

Judge Bkeck

deliveied the opinion of the Couit.

The rule is well settled that when there is one good count in a declaration, or one good breach assigned, a demurrer to the whole declaration will not reach a faulty count or bad breach, but should be overruled. In this case the plaintiff assigns as a breach, the failure of the Constable to pay over to the relator money collected upon an execution, in which the relator was not the plaintiff, but which he alledges had been assigned to him by the plaintiff, and which he had placed in the hands of the Constable for collection.

The rule is, that the plaintiff only, in the execution, in such case, could sue as relator. That the relator must have the legal title and that one having a mere equitable right is not entitled to the action, or to sue in that character: *Hawkins*vs *The Commonwealth,*(3 *Marshall,*389.)

The declaration does not show that the various notes alledged to have been placed in the hands of the Constable by the relator, for collection, were payable to him, or that he was the legal proprietor thereof, by assignment. The alledged failure, therefore, to pay over to the relator the money collected upon such notes, is not a good breach.

*401*Pirtle*4* *Speed*for plaintiff

The declaration however contains some good breaches. It is alledged the Constable failed to pay over money collected upon -executions, placed in his han'ds by the relator, and-in which he was the plaintiff.

The demurrer being to the whole declaration, should therefore, have been overruled, unless the fact that the ■last 'breach assigned, being inconsistent with and repugnant to the previous ones, rendered the whole declaration bad. .After alledging the collection of the several executions, notes, &e„ and the failure to -pay over, a *failure*to collect, and pay over is assigned as a further breach.

It would doubtless have been more in conformity with .the strict rules of pleading and the general practice, to ¡have relied upon this matter in a seperate count.

, But as each breach is in itself good* and as neither ■showed that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, the repugnancy -cannot be rendered available upon a general demurrer.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed .and the cause remanded, with directions to overrule the defendant’s demurrer to the declaration, and for further proceedings, and the parties should be permitted to amend their pleadings.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.605 What are the procedures for reporting a possible workplace safety or health violation at a deepwater port? Any person may notify the Sector Commander, or the MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority verbally or in writing of: ( a ) A possible violation of a regulation in this part; or
( b ) A hazardous or unsafe working condition on any deepwater port.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39183, July 1, 2013]
exh_101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


CBLI Long-term Executive Compensation Incentive Plan


 


The proposed CBLI strategic plan identifies 3 major milestones (goals) that will result in an increase in shareholder value.  Those events are:


 


Goal #1 – Approval of a BLA for 502 for treatment as a single agent to reduce the risk of death following total body irradiation during or after radiation disaster (CBLB502 defense application)


Goal #2 – CBLI 502 Defense- Cumulative Firm Orders (all countries exceed $100M)


Goal #3 – Cumulative proceeds from upfront and milestone payments from licensing deals for any of CBLI compounds exceed $12M (the licensing deals done for the compounds from our subs should be adjusted by the % of CBLI ownership when the licensing agreement is executed)


 


Under the proposed long term plan, compensation would be paid to each member of the Executive Team (CEO, President, CFO, and CSO) upon achievement of each strategic objective.  It is proposed that each payment amount would be equal to a percentage of the Executive’s base salary at the moment of the award for Goal #1 or a percentage of the cumulative firm order/licensing proceeds for Goals #2 and 3.


 


Upon achievement of Goal #1 in the United States, each Executive Team member will be paid a bonus equal to 100% of their base salary based on the achievement date.


 


Upon the first occurrence of the achievement of Goal #1 in any of the following countries or jurisdictions, each Executive Team member will be paid a bonus equal to 33% of their base salary on the achievement date: Japan, EU, China, Canada, Brazil, Russian Federation, India, Mexico, South Korea and Australia. In addition to the above described bonuses, upon the achievement of Goal #1 in the United States or in another country listed above, an amount equal to 100% of the total of the Executive Team bonus’ will be placed into a bonus pool to be distributed to non-executive employees of CBLI at the sole discretion of the Executive Team.


 


The following percentages of cumulative firm order/licensing proceeds will be paid to each Executive Team member upon achievement of each strategic goal/milestone as follows:


 


Upon achievement of Goal #2 or Goal #3, 4% from all received cumulative orders/licensing payments will be allocated to an executive bonus pool, which will be distributed among the members of the executive team. An additional 1% of all received cumulative orders/licensing payments will be allocated to an employee’s bonus pool, which will be distributed among company’s senior employees on a pro rata basis based on salary.


 


Based on the company’s cash position when a goal is achieved, the Compensation Committee of the BoD shall determine whether the incentive payouts will be in cash or stock, or a combination of both.


 




  





  











  






The plan will become effective immediately upon BoD approval and will expire on December 31, 2016.  If any named milestones do not occur by that date, no amount is payable for the goal.
#### Elya Peker, Appellant, v Arthur A. Kaplan et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 20, 1996;

decided May 2, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed appellant’s appeal to that Court from an order of Supreme Court denying plaintiff’s discovery requests, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.310 Exempted vessels: operations. The owner, operator, and master of each vessel that has been granted an exemption under this subpart must ensure that: ( a ) The vessel trades only between ports or places within the United States, its territories or possessions;
( b ) The vessel loads cargo only at ports or places listed in the exemption;
( c ) Except as allowed under § 157.41 (a) and (b) of this part, any ballast water, except segregated ballast discharged in accordance with § 157.43(b) of this part, and any tank washing or oil cargo residues are: ( 1 ) Retained on board; or
( 2 ) Transferred to a shore-based reception facility that is listed in the application for exemption, or in the case of an emergency or a shipyard entry, an alternative acceptable to the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection;
( d ) The vessel loads only those cargoes listed in the exemption; and
( e ) The letter under § 157.306 that grants the exemption is on board the vessel; or
( f ) The certificate of inspection bearing the following endorsement is on board the vessel:
Exempted under 33 CFR 157.306 from the requirements of (*33 CFR 157.10a or 157.10c , whichever is appropriate, will be inserted*). This vessel may not discharge cargo in any foreign port, nor may it load cargo in a port other than the following: (*a list of ports contained in the application that is accepted by the Coast Guard for the exempted vessel will be inserted here*). [CGD 79-126, 46 FR 3513, Jan. 15, 1981, as amended by CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11630, Mar. 22, 1985; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification by Stephen Mack pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

          Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Inforte Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|           | Inforte Corp. |
|----------------|---------------|
|           |          |   |
|           |          |   |
|           | By:           | */s/   Stephen Mack* |
|           |          |  |
| March 28, 2006 |          | Stephen Mack, |
|           |          | Chief Executive Officer |