alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.861 Blind Slough.

The draws of the Portland and Western railroad bridge, mile 1.1 at Knappa, shall open on signal if at least one hour notice is given. However, the draw shall open promptly on signal from four hours before to four hours after each day's authorized commercial fishing period established by the Columbia River Compact (Washington State Department of Fisheries and the Fish Commission of Oregon) for the Columbia River Fishery below Bonneville Dam.

[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40056, June 29, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.540 What are the requirements for obstruction lights on a single point mooring? ( a ) The lights for a single point mooring must meet the requirements for obstruction lights in part 67 of this chapter, except that the lights must be located at least 10 feet (3 meters) above mean high water.
( b ) A submerged turret loading (STL) deepwater port is not required to meet the requirements for obstruction lights, provided it maintains at least a five-foot (1.5 meters) clearance beneath the net under keel clearance at the mean low water condition for all vessels transiting the area.
( c ) An STL deepwater port that utilizes a marker buoy must be lighted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 22 Overview : 1. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.9 

### Major Updates : 1. Fixed issue of some aircraft unable to determine their altitudes. 2. Fixed issue of the DJI Pilot app unable to obtain and display battery error history. 3. Fixed issue of the compass calibration progress not being displayed properly. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.9, otherwise future firmwa re will not be able to install.  Users may skip updating the remote controller if they have already updated the firmware to v1.1.8, as the latest firmware update does not affect the remote controller.

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 8 Overview : 2. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.8 

### Major Updates : 4. Fixed the issue of failure to update the firmware if the remote controller is turned off. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.8, otherwise future firmware will not be able to install.  Re - link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware update .

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 6 Overview : 3. All - in - One F irmware version updated to : v1. 1.6 4. DJI Pilot app iOS version updated to: v1.1.1 5. DJI Pilot app Android version updated to: v1.1.0 

### Major Updates : Updated to be compatible with the iOS version of the DJI Pilot app. 

### Notice : Re - link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware upgrade.
Original

No. 7536

#### Terry A. Bishop *& a.*v. Martineau Plumbing and Heating Co., Inc.

June 20, 1977

*Raymond Bishop,*of Milford, by power of attorney, by brief, for the plaintiffs.

*Cristiano, Kromphold & Green,*of Keene *(Mr. Cristiano*by brief), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

Case to recover damages caused the plaintiffs by defective material furnished and improper workmanship by the defendant. Trial by the court, resulting in a verdict for the defendant.

During the trial the plaintiffs excepted to rulings of the court admitting and excluding evidence. After the verdict, the plaintiffs excepted to the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Transferred by *King,*J.

The evidence was contradictory, but it is firmly established that such conflicts are for the trial court to resolve. *Clover &c. Co. v. Smith Co.,*96 N.H. 491, 79 A.2d 8 (1951); *Wilson v. LeGrice,*113 N.H. 485, 309 A.2d 646 (1973). An examination of the entire record, including the transcript, discloses no errors and that the evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment on the verdict.*
Update of NIOSH Carcinogen Classification and Target Risk 

Level Policy for Chemical Hazards in the Workplace

2013

Meeting: Surface Transportation Board Hearing Room 

Patriots Plaza One, 395 E Street SW., 1st Floor, Room 120, 

Washington, DC 20201

Monday, December 16, 2013, 9:00 am – 4:00 pm*

*Please note that the public meeting will end after this agenda has been 

completed, even if that time is before 4:00 pm.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:05 am Introductions and Description of Meeting 

Procedures

Lauralynn McKernan, Sc.D.

Deputy Director, Education and 

Information Division, NIOSH

9:05 – 9:15 am Welcome and Overview John Howard, M.D.

Director, NIOSH

9:15 – 9:45 am Presentation on the Background and Key 

Points of the Draft NIOSH Carcinogen 

Classification Policy 

Paul Schulte, Ph.D.

Director, Education and Information 

Division, NIOSH

9:45 – 10:00 am Questions/Answers of Clarification for the 

Previous Presentation

Audience/NIOSH Panelists

10:00 am Public Opportunities to Provide Comment

(The persons listed below who have registered in advance to speak will have up to 20 

minutes each. The meeting Chair may announce a brief break at approximately 10:30 

am. Once the pre-registered speakers have finished, opportunities to comment will be 

extended to the general public. Depending on the proceedings this may not occur 

until after the lunch break.)

 Darius Sivin (International Union, UAW)

 Anna Mazzucco (National Research Center for Women and Families)

 James Melius (NYS Laborers Health and Safety Trust Fund)

 Lee Anderson (BlueGreen Alliance)

 Howard Marks (National Asphalt Pavement Association)

12:00 – 1:00 pm Break for Lunch 

1:00 pm Additional Public Opportunities to Provide Comment 

(following the 

last public 

comment)

Additional Questions/Answers of 

Clarification

Paul Schulte, Ph.D. and

NIOSH Panelists

Prior to 4:00 pm Concluding Remarks, Summary of Next 

Steps, and Adjournment

Lauralynn McKernan, Sc.D.

NOTE: For remote participation via teleconference, those who have registered with the NIOSH Docket 

Office (niocindocket@cdc.gov) should use the following dial-in number and passcode. Teleconference 

participants will be muted to avoid distractions during presentations, and then unmuted periodically to 

allow opportunities for questions or comment. This teleconference number may not guarantee access for 

international callers. 

Dial-in number: 877-664-7856

Passcode: 9670230
§ 13.01-25 Description of Gold Lifesaving Medal. ( a ) The Gold Lifesaving Medal is 99.9 percent pure gold and consists of a pendant suspended by a swivel from the head of an eagle attached to a silk grogram ribbon 1 and 3 ⁄ 8ths inches in width, composed of a 3 ⁄ 16ths of an inch red stripe, a 1 ⁄ 32d of an inch white stripe, a 15 ⁄ 16ths of an inch gold stripe, a 1 ⁄ 32d of an inch white stripe, and a 3 ⁄ 16ths of an inch red stripe. The pendant is 1 and 7 ⁄ 16ths inches in diameter and 3 ⁄ 32ds of an inch in thickness. There appear, on the obverse side of the pendant, three men in a boat in a heavy sea; one is rescuing a person clinging to a spar at the end of which is a block and line; another is standing, prepared to heave a line; a third is rowing; in the distance, to the left, is the wreck of a vessel; the whole is encircled by the words: “United States of America”, in the upper half, and “Act of Congress, August 4, 1949”, in the lower half. On the reverse side of the pendant there appears, in the center a monument surmounted by an American eagle; the figure of a woman stands, to the left, holding in her left hand an oak wreath, and with her right hand, preparing to inscribe the name of the recipient on the monument; to the right are grouped a mast, a yard with a sail, an anchor, a sextant, and a laurel branch; the whole is encircled by the words: “In testimony of heroic deeds in saving life from the perils of the water.”
( b ) Engraving: Before presentation, the recipient's name shall be inscribed on the “monument”, on the reverse of the medal.
Hillsborough

No. 7719

No. 7720

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Roland Charpentier The State of New Hampshire v. Gregory L. Morse

August 1, 1977

*David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Richard B. Michaud,*attorney *(Mr. Michaud*orally), for the state.

*Holland & Aivalilcles (Mr. William E. Aivalikles*orally), for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

The issue before this court is whether defendants’ motion for late appeal was properly denied by the Superior Court *(Goode,*J.). On May 3, 1976, Roland Charpentier was convicted by the Nashua District Court for leaving the scene of an accident. On April 27, 1976, Gregory L. Morse was convicted for possession of marijuana. Appearance cards were filed for defendant Charpentier in the Hillsborough County Superior Court on May 3, 1976, and for defendant Morse on April 28, 1976. The superior court entered both appearances on May 6, 1976. The district court complaints were never transferred to the superior court for appeal. On August 16, 1976, defense counsel filed motions for late appeal with the superior court. The motions were denied and all questions of law were reserved and transferred.

*648Under RSA 599:1, the time for an appeal to be entered may be extended by the superior court if good cause is shown. RSA 491: App. R.54 (Supp. 1975) states that motions grounded upon facts must be “. . . verified upon affidavit, or . . . apparent from the record or from the papers on file in the case . . . .” Defendants presented no affidavits establishing the filing of timely appeals, authenticating their claims of clerical error in the district court clerk’s office, or the payment of appeal fees. Therefore, defendants’ motion for late entry was correctly denied because they failed to meet their statutory burden of showing good cause under RSA 599:1.

*Defendants’ exceptions overruled.*

Grimes, J., did not sit.
#### § 780.722 Exempt workweeks.

An employee performing work for an establishment commonly recognized as a country elevator is exempt under section 13(b)(14) in any workweek when he is, for the entire workweek, employed “by” such establishment, if no more than five employees are “employed in the establishment in such operations”, and if the “area of production” requirement is met.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration StatementsNo. 333-115606, 333-132197 and 333-13543 on Form S-8 for Epic Bancorp,of our report dated March 29, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of Epic Bancorp and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period endedDecember 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006annual report on Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp.

| /s/ VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| Rancho Cucamonga, California            |
| March 29, 2007                     |
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.440 Des Allemands Bayou. ( a ) The draw of the S631 bridge, mile 13.9 at Des Allemands, shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad bridge, mile 14.0, shall open on signal Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. At all other times the draw shall open on signal if at least 4 hours notice is given.
[CGD08-93-028, 59 FR 14757, Mar. 30, 1994. Redesignated by USCG-2014-1039, 80 FR 11550, Mar. 4, 2015]
#### First State Bank of Irvington v. Richardson, et al.

(Decided January 18, 1916.)

Appeal from Meade Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Incomplete Record — Affirmance.—Where portions of either the pleadings or the evidence hearing on the questions involved are omitted from the record on appeal, the judgment will -he* affirmed.

JOHN P. HASWELL, JR., for appellant.

LEWIS & ASHCRAFT for appellees.

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

*772■ On January 15th, 1910, Alice A. Richardson and her husband, G-us W. Richardson, executed and delivered to the First State Bank two notes, one for $500.00 and the other for $100.00, payable four months after date and bearing interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum. To secure the notes they executed and delivered to the bank a mortgage on a small tract of land owned by Alice A. Richardson. The mortgage shows that the indebtedness secured thereby was the indebtedness of Gus W. Richardson. The bank brought suit to recover on the notes and enforce its. mortgage lien. Failing to answer, personal judgment was rendered against both Mrs. and Mr. Richardson and the land was directed to be sold. The proceeds were not sufficient to discharge the debt. Thereupon the bank caused an execution to issue for the balance.

This action was brought by Mrs. Richardson, pursuant to section 518 of the Civil Code, to vacate the judgment. On final hearing she was awarded the relief prayed for and defendant appeals.

The appeal is here on an incomplete record. Where portions of either the pleadings or evidence bearing upon the question involved are omitted from the record on appeal, the judgment will be affirmed. Terrell v. Rowland, 86 Ky., 67; Courier-Journal Job Printing Co., &c v. Cordozo, et al., 21 Ky. Law Rep., 1259, 54 S. W., 966; Sanson, et al. v. Connolly, et al., 141 Ky., 120.

Judgment affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Robert Binenfeld, Appellant, v New York State Department of Health et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 29, 1996;

decided October 17, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see,*CPLR 5513, 5514).
### NUMBER 13

- 09

- 00 3 73

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

NORMA DE LA TORRE

, Appellant,

v.

NOE FLORES SALINAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras a nd Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

This cause is now before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

This case was abated on July 15, 2010, due to ongoing litigation related to a settlement

agreement.2 The Court, having considered the documents on file and the motion to dismiss the

appeal, hereby REINSTATES the case and GRANTS the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.1(a).

The appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the

appellant."). All pending motions, specifically including Appellant’s Motion to Determine

the Finality of the Judgment, are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Therefore, having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’s request, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GREG T. PERKES

Justice

Delivered and filed the

15th day of October, 2020

.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Cable Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph M. Melanson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 19, 2002                By: /s/ Joseph M. Melanson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              Joseph M. Melanson
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.2

 



 

 

May 22nd, 2012

Agreement

Dear Keith and Tim,

 

As discussed with Keith and Wiley this morning, I am detailing below my proposal for assisting Twin Cities Power (“TCP”) and Twin Cities Retail Energy (“TCRE”) in the raising of capital and in providing advisory services. I want to keep matters simple and I am doing this though my energy consulting practice, since I have carved that out of Meridian, although Katmando is an affiliate of Meridian through common ownership.

 

1.             On a best efforts basis, Katmando will raise $10-$30mn in debt and/or equity, or in combination, or such other amount as the parties may determine is required, either in name of TCP or TCRE, or in combination.

2.             Katmando will receive a 150 day exclusive for Canada, to complete the raise.

3.             Katmando will prepare such materials as may be required, such as short-form executive summary (“Greensheet”), PowerPoint etc.

4.             Katmando will work with TCP, TCRE, and its advisors and investment bankers in the USA, to ensure applicable securities laws compliance and will seek prior approval for the distribution/disclosure of any materials to third parties.

5.             Katmando will receive a Consulting Fee in the amount of $25,000 Canadian plus applicable taxes.  $12,500 shall be paid upon the signing this Agreement and $12,500 shall be payable within 30 days of the execution of the Agreement.

6.             Katmando will received flat commissions of 4% on any funds raised, paid upon each successful Closing.

7.             Katmando will be responsible for its own expenses, except  for travel and accommodations incurred in connection with said capital raise, which shall be at TCP/TCRE cost, and for which prior approval shall be obtained.

8.             If after 150 days, but prior to the expiration of 1 calendar year from this date, any capital is raised from one or more of Katmando’s sources, then Katmando shall be entitled to the full commissions included in 5., above.

9.             The Agreement may be terminated by either party on fourteen (14) days written email notice to the non-terminating party.

 

If this Agreement is acceptable, please sign and return a copy, and thereafter an Invoice and wire transfer instructions will follow. I look forward to getting to work!

 

With kind regards,



Keith A. Turner

 

For TCP/TCRE  /s/ Timothy Krieger
Feeding Your Loved One: Tips for Caregivers

Approximately 85% of people with dementia and chronic illness are cared for exclusively in their own 

homes, and one major worry for caregivers can be ensuring that their loved one is eating healthfully. 

Good nutrition is important for managing chronic conditions like diabetes and heart disease, preserving

stamina and independence, and maintaining a strong immune system that can fend off illnesses. 

However, special dietary needs, reduced ability to eat independently or recognize hunger, reduced 

appetite, difficult behaviors, and other issues all can make providing a healthy diet challenging, and 

malnutrition is a real risk. 

Looking for strategies to improve nutrition and reduce stressful mealtimes? The What’s on Your Plate?

guide from the National Institute on Aging Resources can help with choosing foods and planning meals, 

and the following ideas may help meals go more smoothly:

FEEDING TIPS FOR CAREGIVERS

 Offer one food at a time. Too much food on a plate can be confusing and overwhelming.

 Eat with your loved one. Model eating behavior and have pleasant conversations during meals.

Talk about the smell and enjoyment of each food.

 If chewing or swallowing are a problem, prepare soft, chopped or bite-size like cottage cheese, 

scrambled eggs, applesauce, etc. Watch for choking hazards like small hard objects (grapes, raw 

carrot pieces). Make sure dentures are in place and fit well.

 Keep table settings simple to avoid distractions. Don’t worry about messy eating.

 Serve finger foods like sandwiches (in quarters), carrot or cheese sticks, fruit slices.

 Optimize appetite for meals by offering opportunities for physical activity and avoid constipation 

with plenty of fluids and fiber.

 Offer small, frequent meals rather than three large meals.

To find more ideas for feeding people with dementia or to prevent malnutrition in your older loved one, 

consult your healthcare provider, contact a dietitian, or visit the nutrition resources created by the 

Alzheimer’s Association, the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Need additional assistance? Through grants to states and community organizations, the Administration 

for Community Living funds several programs that provide support to family caregivers. Find out what’s 

available in your community by contacting the ElderCare Locator online or at 800-677-1116, or by 

visiting the caregiver resources pages on ACL.gov.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.627 Must material safety data sheets be available to all personnel? ( a ) The person in charge must ensure that a material safety data sheet (MSDS) for each hazardous material on the fixed or floating deepwater port is made available to all personnel on the port.
( b ) Each MSDS must contain at least information on the use, proper storage, potential hazards, and appropriate protective and response measures to be taken when exposed to or handling the material.
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.404 Can I use fire fighting equipment that is not Coast Guard approved? ( a ) A deepwater port may use fire fighting equipment that is not Coast Guard approved as excess equipment, pursuant to § 149.403 of this subpart, if the equipment does not endanger the port or the persons aboard it in any way. This equipment must be listed and labeled by a nationally recognized testing laboratory (NRTL), as set forth in 29 CFR 1910.7, and it must be maintained in good working condition.
( b ) Use of non-Coast Guard-approved fire detection systems may be acceptable as excess equipment provided that— ( 1 ) Components are listed by an NRTL as defined in 46 CFR 161.002-2, and are designed, installed, tested, and maintained in accordance with an appropriate industry standard and the manufacturer's specific guidance;
( 2 ) Installation conforms to the requirements of 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter J (Electrical Engineering), with specific regard to the hazardous location installation regulations in 46 CFR 111.105;
( 3 ) Coast Guard plan review is completed for wiring plans; and
( 4 ) The system and units remain functional as intended. To ensure this, marine inspectors may test and inspect the system.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48243, July 22, 2016]