[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51940-51943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21259]



[[Page 51940]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-893]


Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 14, 2011, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') published in the Federal Register the Preliminary 
Results of the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People's Republic of 
China (``PRC'').\1\ We gave interested parties an opportunity to 
comment on the Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the 
comments and information received, we continue to find that Hilltop \2\ 
has not sold subject merchandise at less than normal value (``NV'') 
during the period of review (``POR''), February 1, 2009, through 
January 31, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's 
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Partial 
Rescission of Fifth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 
8338 (February 14, 2011) (``Preliminary Results'').
    \2\ Hilltop International (``Hilltop'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: August 19, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Palmer and Kabir Archuletta, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
9068 and (202) 482-2593, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On April 9, 2010, the Department initiated an administrative review 
of 92 producers/exporters of subject merchandise from the PRC.\3\ 
Subsequently, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department 
rescinded the administrative review with respect to Allied Pacific 
Aquatic Products Zhanjiang Co., Ltd. and Allied Pacific Food (Dalian) 
Co., Ltd. based on upon Petitioner's timely withdrawal of its review 
request.\4\ As noted above, on February 14, 2011, the Department 
published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.\5\ In 
those Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily rescinded the 
review with respect to several companies that submitted no shipment 
certifications and for which we have not found any information to 
contradict these claims. These companies are Yangjiang City Yelin 
Hoitat Quick Frozen Seafood Co., Ltd., Fuqing Yihua Aquatic Food Co., 
Ltd., Fuqing Minhua Trade Co., Ltd., and Shantou Yelin Frozen Seafood 
Co., Ltd. (d.b.a. Shantou Yelin Quick-Freeze Marine Products Co., 
Ltd.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Initiation of Administrative Reviews and 
Requests for Revocation in Part of the Antidumping Duty Orders on 
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and 
the People's Republic of China, 75 FR 18154 (April 9, 2010) for a 
list of these companies.
    \4\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's 
Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 75 FR 42070 (July 20, 2010).
    \5\ See Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 3, 2011, we extended the deadline for parties to submit 
the case briefs and rebuttal briefs to March 21, 2011, and March 28, 
2011, respectively.\6\ On March 7, 2011, the Petitioner,\7\ Domestic 
Processors,\8\ and Hilltop submitted additional surrogate value 
information. On March 17, 2011, Domestic Processors submitted rebuttal 
surrogate value information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Letter from the Department to Interested Parties, dated 
March 3, 2011.
    \7\ Petitioner is the Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee 
(hereinafter referred to as ``Petitioner'').
    \8\ These domestic parties are the American Shrimp Processors 
Association and Louisiana Shrimp Association (hereinafter referred 
to as ``Domestic Processors'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 21, 2010, Domestic Processors and Hilltop filed case 
briefs. On March 21, 2010, we received new factual information 
contained within Petitioner's case brief. On March 24, 2011, we 
rejected Petitioner's new factual information as being untimely filed, 
removed the new factual information from the record of this review and 
provided Petitioner until March 28, 2011 to re-file its case brief. 
Additionally, we extended the deadline for rebuttal briefs until March 
30, 2011.\9\ On March 28, 2011, Petitioner resubmitted its case brief. 
On March 30, 2010, Petitioner, Domestic Processors, and Hilltop filed 
rebuttal briefs. On May 24, 2011, the Department extended the deadline 
for the completion of the final results of this review until August 13, 
2011.\10\ On June 21 and July 11, 2011, the Department place on the 
record, information pertaining to the Department's recently revised 
labor rate methodology.\11\ Between July 7 and July 14, 2011, 
interested parties submitted comments regarding the Department's 
recently revised surrogate labor methodology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Letter from the Department to Petitioner dated March 24, 
2011.
    \10\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's 
Republic of China: Extension of Final Results of the Fifth 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 30100 (May 24, 2011).
    \11\ See Memorandum to the File, through Catherine Bertrand, 
Program Manager, Office 9, AD/CVD Operations, from Bob Palmer, Case 
Analyst, Office 9, AD/CVD Operations, re: ``Fifth Administrative 
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Frozen Warmwater 
Shrimp from the People's Republic of China: Industry-Specific 
Surrogate Labor Rate and Surrogate Financial Ratio Adjustments,'' 
dated June 21, 2011 (``Labor Memo''); see also, Memorandum to the 
File, through Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, Office 9, AD/CVD 
Operations, from Bob Palmer, Case Analyst, Office 9, AD/CVD 
Operations, re: ``Fifth Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's 
Republic of China: Revision to Surrogate Wage Rate Methodology and 
Financial Ratio Adjustments,'' dated July 11, 2011 (``Revised Labor 
Memo'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the ``Fifth Administrative Review of 
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of China: Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,'' which is dated 
concurrently with this notice (``I&D Memo''). A list of the issues that 
parties raised and to which we respond in the I&D Memo is attached to 
this notice as an Appendix. The I&D Memo is a public document and is on 
file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Main Commerce Building, 
Room 7046, and is accessible on the Department's website at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and electronic version of the 
memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record as well as comments received from 
parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made two revisions to 
Hilltop's margin calculation for the final results. First, we have 
revised the surrogate value source for shrimp larvae. For the 
Preliminary Results, we used Sharat Industries Limited (``Sharat'') 
2008-2009 financial statements to value shrimp larvae.\12\ For the 
final results, the Department has determined to use Sharat's 2009-2010 
financial statements as a surrogate value source for shrimp larvae. For 
further information see I&D Memo at Comment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See ``Memorandum to the File through Catherine Bertrand, 
Program Manager, Office 9, from Kabir Archuletta, Case Analyst, 
Office 9, re; Fifth Administrative Review of Certain Frozen 
Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of China: Surrogate 
Factor Valuations for the Preliminary Results,'' dated February 7, 
2011 (``Prelim SV Memo'') at 3-4 and Exhibit 3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 51941]]

    Additionally, we have revised the surrogate labor calculation 
methodology. For further information see I&D Memo at Comment 5; see 
also, ``Memorandum to the File through Catherine Bertrand, Program 
Manager, Office 9 from Kabir Archuletta, Case Analyst, Office 9; Fifth 
Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 
People's Republic of China: Surrogate Factor Valuations for the Final 
Results,'' (``Final SV Memo'') dated concurrently with this notice. 
Because of the change in the surrogate labor calculation methodology 
noted above, the antidumping duty margin calculation for Hilltop has 
changed since the Preliminary Results. For further details on Hilltop's 
changes, see the company specific analysis memorandum.

Labor Cost Methodology

    Pursuant to the Department's recent decision regarding it final 
labor methodology,\13\ we have calculated a revised hourly labor rate 
to use in valuing Hilltop's reported labor. The revised surrogate value 
for labor is calculated by using India's, the primary surrogate 
country, labor cost data from ``Chapter 6A: Labor Cost in 
Manufacturing'' from the International Labor Organization (``ILO'') 
Yearbook of Labor Statistics. Additionally, because the Department is 
now using Chapter 6A to calculate labor costs, the Department made 
certain adjustments in the surrogate financial ratio calculations 
regarding labor. See I&D Memo at Comment 5; see also, Labor Memo and 
Revised Labor Memo, for the details of the calculation and supporting 
data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Antidumping Methodologies in Proceedings Involving Non-
Market Economies: Valuing the Factor of Production: Labor, 76 FR 
36092 (June 21, 2011) (``Labor Methodologies'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order includes certain frozen warmwater shrimp 
and prawns, whether wild-caught (ocean harvested) or farm-raised 
(produced by aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shell-on or peeled, 
tail-on or tail-off,\14\ deveined or not deveined, cooked or raw, or 
otherwise processed in frozen form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ ``Tails'' in this context means the tail fan, which 
includes the telson and the uropods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The frozen warmwater shrimp and prawn products included in the 
scope of this Order, regardless of definitions in the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (``HTS''), are products which are 
processed from warmwater shrimp and prawns through freezing and which 
are sold in any count size.
    The products described above may be processed from any species of 
warmwater shrimp and prawns. Warmwater shrimp and prawns are generally 
classified in, but are not limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some 
examples of the farmed and wild-caught warmwater species include, but 
are not limited to, white-leg shrimp (Penaeus vannemei), banana prawn 
(Penaeus merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus chinensis), giant river 
prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon), 
redspotted shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern brown shrimp 
(Penaeus subtilis), southern pink shrimp (Penaeus notialis), southern 
rough shrimp (Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern white shrimp 
(Penaeus schmitti), blue shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western white 
shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), and Indian white prawn (Penaeus 
indicus).
    Frozen shrimp and prawns that are packed with marinade, spices or 
sauce are included in the scope of this order. In addition, food 
preparations, which are not ``prepared meals,'' that contain more than 
20 percent by weight of shrimp or prawn are also included in the scope 
of this order.
    Excluded from the scope are: (1) Breaded shrimp and prawns (HTS 
subheading 1605.20.1020); (2) shrimp and prawns generally classified in 
the Pandalidae family and commonly referred to as coldwater shrimp, in 
any state of processing; (3) fresh shrimp and prawns whether shell-on 
or peeled (HTS subheadings 0306.23.0020 and 0306.23.0040); (4) shrimp 
and prawns in prepared meals (HTS subheading 1605.20.0510); (5) dried 
shrimp and prawns; (6) Lee Kum Kee's shrimp sauce; (7) canned warmwater 
shrimp and prawns (HTS subheading 1605.20.1040); (8) certain dusted 
shrimp; and (9) certain battered shrimp. Dusted shrimp is a shrimp-
based product: (1) That is produced from fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) 
and peeled shrimp; (2) to which a ``dusting'' layer of rice or wheat 
flour of at least 95 percent purity has been applied; (3) with the 
entire surface of the shrimp flesh thoroughly and evenly coated with 
the flour; (4) with the non-shrimp content of the end product 
constituting between four and 10 percent of the product's total weight 
after being dusted, but prior to being frozen; and (5) that is 
subjected to individually quick frozen (``IQF'') freezing immediately 
after application of the dusting layer. Battered shrimp is a shrimp-
based product that, when dusted in accordance with the definition of 
dusting above, is coated with a wet viscous layer containing egg and/or 
milk, and par-fried.
    The products covered by this Order are currently classified under 
the following HTS subheadings: 0306.13.0003, 0306.13.0006, 
0306.13.0009, 0306.13.0012, 0306.13.0015, 0306.13.0018, 0306.13.0021, 
0306.13.0024, 0306.13.0027, 0306.13.0040, 1605.20.1010 and 
1605.20.1030. These HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
for customs purposes only and are not dispositive, but rather the 
written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ On April 26, 2011, the Department amended the antidumping 
duty order to include dusted shrimp, pursuant to the U.S. Court of 
International Trade (``CIT'') decision in Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action 
Committee v. United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010) and the 
U.S. International Trade Commission (``ITC'') determination, which 
found the domestic like product to include dusted shrimp. Because 
the amendment of the antidumping duty order occurred after this POR, 
dusted shrimp continue to be excluded in this review. See Certain 
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, India, the People's Republic of 
China, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended 
Antidumping Duty Orders in Accordance with Final Court Decision, 76 
FR 23227 (April 26, 2011); see also, Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action 
Committee v. United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010) (``Ad 
Hoc'') and Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, China, India, 
Thailand, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1063, 1064, 1066-
1068 (Review), USITC Publication 4221, March 2011 (``ITC Review 
Final'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Partial Rescission

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily rescinded 
this review with respect to the following companies: Shantou Yelin 
Frozen Seafood Co., Ltd. (d.b.a. Shantou Yelin Quick-Freeze Marine 
Products Co., Ltd.); Yangjiang City Yelin Hoitat Quick Frozen Seafood 
Co., Ltd., Fuqing Yihua Aquatic Food Co., Ltd., and Fuqing Minhua 
Trading Co., Ltd. The Department determined that they had no shipments 
of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.
    Subsequent to the Preliminary Results, no information was submitted 
on the record indicating that the above companies made sales to the 
United States of subject merchandise during the POR and no party 
provided written arguments regarding this issue. Thus, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our practice, we are 
rescinding this review with respect to the above-named companies.

Affiliation/Single Entity

    In the Preliminary Results, we found Hilltop, Yelin Enterprise Co., 
Ltd., Ocean Beauty Corporation, and Ever Hope International Co., Ltd. 
to be a single entity for purposes of this

[[Page 51942]]

administrative review.\16\ Because we have not received any information 
on the record that contradicts our preliminary finding, we continue to 
find Hilltop, Yelin Enterprise Co., Ltd. Ocean Beauty Corporation, and 
Ever Hope International Co., Ltd. to be a single entity for these final 
results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Preliminary Results at 8339 and 8340; see 19 CFR 
351.401(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    In our Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that 
Hilltop and Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine Resources Co., Ltd. 
(``Regal'') met the criteria for the application of a separate 
rate.\17\ We have not received any information since the issuance of 
the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for the reconsideration 
of these determinations. Therefore, the Department continues to find 
that Hilltop and Regal meet the criteria for a separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Preliminary Results at 8341.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Non-Selected Companies

    In the Preliminary Results, we stated that the Department employed 
a limited examination methodology, as it did not have the resources to 
examine all companies for which a review request was made, and selected 
Hilltop as a mandatory respondent in this review.\18\ Additionally, 
Regal submitted timely information as requested by the Department and 
remained subject to review as a cooperative separate rate respondent. 
In the Preliminary Results, the Department assigned Regal its rate 
calculated in the previous administrative review.\19\ As we stated in 
the Preliminary Results, the rate for the individually examined 
respondent, Hilltop, continues to be de minimis and accordingly, the 
Department will determine a reasonable method for assigning a rate to 
Regal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Preliminary Results at 8338.
    \19\ See Preliminary Results at 8342; see also, Administrative 
Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 75 FR 49460, 49463 (August 13, 2010) (``PRC 
Shrimp AR4'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to individual companies not 
selected for examination when the Department limited its examination in 
an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. 
Generally we have looked to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for respondents 
we did not examine in an administrative review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of 
the Act articulates a preference that we are not to calculate an all-
others rate using any zero or de minimis margins or any margins based 
entirely on facts available. Accordingly, the Department's usual 
practice has been to average the rates for the selected companies, 
excluding zero, de minimis and rates based entirely on facts available. 
See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, 
and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Review in Part, 73 FR 52823, 
52824 (September 11, 2008) and accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum at Comment 16. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act also provides 
that, where all margins are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 
facts available, we may use ``any reasonable method'' for assigning the 
rate to non-selected respondents, including ``averaging the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins determined for the exporters and 
producers individually investigated.''
    In previous cases, the Department has determined that a 
``reasonable method'' to use when, as here, the rates of the mandatory 
respondents are zero and de minimis, is to apply to those companies not 
selected for individual review (but eligible for a separate rate in NME 
cases) the average of the most recently determined rates that are not 
zero, de minimis or based entirely on facts available (which may be 
from a prior administrative review or a new shipper review).\20\ 
However, if any such nonselected company had its own calculated rate 
that is contemporaneous with or more recent than such prior determined 
rates, the Department has applied such individual rate to the 
nonselected company in the review in question, including when that rate 
is zero or de minimis.\21\ In this case, there is only one nonselected 
company under review that is eligible for a separate rate, and this 
company received its own calculated rate that is contemporaneous with 
or more recent than the most recent rates determined for other 
companies that are not zero, de minimis or based entirely on facts 
available. Accordingly, the Department has concluded that in this case 
a reasonable method for determining the rate for the non-selected 
company, Regal, is to apply its most recent individually calculated 
rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See id.; cf. Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd. v. United States, 
2011 WL 1423126 (CIT April 14, 2011).
    \21\ Certain Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam: Notice of Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review and 
Fourth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission 
of the Fourth Administrative Review, 73 FR 52015 (September 8, 2008) 
(changed in final results as final calculated rate for mandatory 
respondent was above de minimis, which remained unchanged in the 
amended final results). Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Final Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 47191, 
47195 (September 15, 2009) and accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRC-Wide Entity

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that those 
companies, which did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate, 
are properly considered part of the PRC-wide entity.\22\ Since the 
Preliminary Results, no interested parties submitted comments regarding 
these findings. Therefore, we continue to treat such entities as part 
of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Preliminary Results at 8340.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    The weighted-average dumping margins for the POR are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                  Manufacturer/Exporter                   average margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilltop International...................................            0.04
Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine Resources Co., Ltd....            0.00
PRC-Wide Entity \23\....................................          112.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the

[[Page 51943]]

Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall 
assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject 
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For 
assessment purpose, we calculated importer (or customer)-specific 
assessment rates for merchandise subject to this review. Where 
appropriate, we calculated an ad valorem rate for each importer (or 
customer) by dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales to 
that party by the total entered values associated with those 
transactions. For duty-assessment rates calculated on this basis, we 
will direct CBP to assess the resulting ad valorem rate against the 
entered customs values for the subject merchandise. Where appropriate, 
we calculated a per-unit rate for each importer (or customer) by 
dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales to that party by 
the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. For duty-
assessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess 
the resulting per-unit rate against the entered quantity of the subject 
merchandise. Where an importer (or customer)-specific assessment rate 
is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), the Department will 
instruct CBP to assess that importer (or customer's) entries of subject 
merchandise without regard to antidumping duties, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.106(c)(2). The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these 
final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ The PRC-wide entity includes the 80 companies currently 
under review that have not established their entitlement to a 
separate rate. Those companies are: Asian Seafoods (Zhanjiang) Co., 
Ltd.; Beautiful Lighting Co., Ltd.; Beihai Qinguo Frozen Foods Co., 
Ltd.; Capital Prospect; Century Distribution Systems (Shenz); Dafu 
Foods Industry; Daishan Baofa Aquatic Product Co.; Elaite Group Co., 
Ltd.; Everflow Ind. Supply; Flags Wins Trading Co., Ltd.; Fuchang 
Aquatic Products; Fujian Haiding Global Foods; Fujian Provincial 
Meihua Aquat.; Fuqing Maowang Seafood Development; Fuqing Xuhu 
Aquatic Food Trdg.; Gallant Ocean (Nanhai), Ltd.; Geelong Sales; 
Guangdong Jiahuang Foods; Guangdong Jinhang Foods Co., Ltd.; 
Guangdong Wanya Foods Fty. Co., Ltd.; Hai Li Aquatic Co., Ltd.; 
Hainan Hailisheng Food Co., Ltd.; Hainan Seaberry Seafoods; Hainan 
Siyuan Foods Co., Ltd.; Hainan Zhongyu Seafood Co., Ltd.; Huasheng 
Aquatic Pro. Factory; Huian County Import & Export and Trading Co.; 
Innovative Aluminum; Intecs Service; Jet Power International Ltd.; 
JetStar Co.; Leizhou Yunyuan Aquatic Products Co., Ltd.; Liang Hsin 
Lighting Shenzhen; Maoming Changxing Foods; Maoming Jiahui Foods 
Co., Ltd.; New Peak Service; North Seafood Group Co.; Panasonic Mfg. 
Xiamen Co.; Phoenix Intl.; Rizhao Smart Foods; Ruian Huasheng 
Aquatic Products Fac.; Savvy Seafood Inc.; Sea Trade International 
Inc.; Second Aquatic Food; Shandong Huashijia Foods; Shanghai Apa 
International Trading; Shanghai Smiling Food Co., Ltd.; Shantou Jin 
Cheng Food Co.; Shantou Longfen Foodstuff Co.; Shantou Longsheng 
Aquatic Product Foodstuff Co., Ltd.; Shantou Red Garden Foodstuff 
Co., Ltd. and/or Shantou Red Garden Food Processing Co., Ltd.; 
Shantou Wanya Foods Fty. Co., Ltd. (Branch Factory); Shantou 
Xinwanya Aquatic Product Ltd.; Shantou Yue Xiang Commercial Trading 
Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Pingyue Trading Co., Ltd.; SLK Hardware; 
Sysgration; Thai Royal Frozen Food Zhanjiang Co., Ltd.; Tianjin 
Dongjiang Food Co., Ltd.; Tongwei Hainan Aquatic Products Co., Ltd.; 
Top One Intl.; Wenling Xingdi Aquatic Product; Yangcheng Seahorse 
Foods; Yangjiang Wanshida Seafood Co., Ltd.; Zhangjiang Bo Bo Go 
Ocean; Zhanjiang Evergreen Aquatic Products; Zhanjiang Fuchang 
Aquatic Product Freezing Plant; Zhanjiang Go-harvest Aquatic 
Products Co., Ltd.; Zhanjiang Haizhou Aquatic Product; Zhanjiang 
Huibaoye Trading Co., Ltd.; Zhanjiang Jebshin Seafood; Zhanjiang 
Jinguo Marine Foods Company Limited; Zhanjiang Longwei Aquatic 
Product; Zhejiang Daishan Baofa Aquatic Products Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang 
Industrial Group Co., Ltd.; Zhj Jinguo Marine Foods; Zhoushan Corp. 
for Intl. Economic and Technical Cooperation; Zhoushan Haohai 
Aquatic Products; Zhoushan Putuo Huafa Sea Products Co., Ltd.; and 
Zhoushan Qiangren Imp. & Exp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash-deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final 
results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, 
i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no cash deposit will be required for that 
company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC 
exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the 
most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise 
which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 112.81 percent; and (4) for 
all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received 
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to 
the PRC exporters that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: August 12, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I--Issues & Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Respondent Selection Methodology
Comment 2: Surrogate Country
Comment 3: Shrimp Larvae
Comment 4: Shrimp Feed
Comment 5: Labor Surrogate Value
Comment 6: North Korean Import Data
Comment 7: Surrogate Financial Ratio Adjustments
Comment 8: Identify Taiwanese Resellers on Custom's Instructions
[FR Doc. 2011-21259 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P