alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.405 Elements of the Area Maritime Security (AMS) Assessment. ( a ) The AMS Assessment must include the following elements: ( 1 ) Identification of the critical Marine Transportation System infrastructure and operations in the port;
( 2 ) Threat assessment that identifies and evaluates each potential threat on the basis of various factors, including capability and intention;
( 3 ) Consequence and vulnerability assessment for each target/scenario combination; and
( 4 ) A determination of the required security measures for the three MARSEC Levels.
( b ) In order to meet the elements listed in paragraph (a) of this section, an AMS Assessment should consider each of the following: ( 1 ) Physical security of infrastructure and operations at the port;
( 2 ) Structures considered critical for the continued operation of the port;
( 3 ) Existing security systems and equipment available to protect maritime personnel;
( 4 ) Procedural policies;
( 5 ) Radio and telecommunication systems, including computer systems and networks;
( 6 ) Relevant transportation infrastructure;
( 7 ) Utilities;
( 8 ) Security resources and capabilities; and
( 9 ) Other areas that may, if damaged, pose a risk to people, infrastructure, or operations within the port.
( c ) AMS Assessments are sensitive security information and must be protected in accordance with 49 CFR part 1520.
§ 110.50 Stonington Harbor, Conn. ( a ) *Area No. 1.* Beginning at the southeastern tip of Wamphassuc Point; thence to the northwesterly end of Stonington Inner Breakwater; thence along the breakwater to longitude 71°54′50.5′′; thence to latitude 41°20′25.3′′, longitude 71°54′50.5′′; thence to a point on the shoreline at latitude 41°20′32′′, longitude 71°54′54.8′′; thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area No. 2.* Beginning at a point on the shoreline at latitude 41°19′55.8′′, longitude 71°54′28.9′′; thence to latitude 41°19′55.8′′, longitude 71°54′37.1′′; thence to latitude 41°20′01.6′′, longitude 71°54′38.8′′; thence to a point on the shoreline at latitude 41°20′02′′, longitude 71°54′34.3′′; thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
( c ) *Area No. 3.* Beginning at a point on the shoreline at latitude 41°20′29.5′′, longitude 71°54′43′′; thence to latitude 41°20′25.6′′, longitude 71°54′48.5′′; thence to latitude 41°20′10.7′′, longitude 71°54′48.5′′; thence to the shoreline at latitude 41°20′10.7′′; thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
[CGFR 68-164, 34 FR 1380, Jan. 29, 1969, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTIVENESS WITHIN THE CHOPTANK RIVER WATERSHED
**Location: Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory**
												Project Number: 1265-12130-002-04Project Type:																				Reimbursable

Start Date: Jun 15, 2004End Date: Sep 30, 2008

**Objective:**Establish benchmark assessment of NRCS/FSA Conservation Programs for application of REMM and SWAT models to provide watershed-scale assessment of conservation practices in the Choptank River Watershed.  Establish contacts and carry out regular information sharing opportunities with poultry producer groups within the Choptank River Watershed.
**Approach:**This project combines the use of historical water quality databases that exist for the Choptank River Watershed with current monitoring within specific sub-watersheds with varying percentages of CRP and CREP installations.  This data will be used to build a functioning watershed model to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices such as CRP and CREP.  A set of 15 subwatersheds (a series of 2nd and 3rd order streams) will be monitored under base flow and storm conditions for nutrients and other water quality indicators.  Partnerships will be sought with producer groups in order to communicate with producers in the watershed to obtain information on current nutrient management practices.  GIS maps with high resolution datasets for land use, soil types, and other related water quality measurable endpoints will be used to construct the model.  Preliminary results of the assessment will be made available to the producers and other customer groups throughout the two-year period as datasets are developed and interpreted using venues that are appropriate and convenient for the customers.
    Project TeamMCCARTY, GREGORY SADEGHI, ALI HAPEMAN, CATHLEEN RICE, CLIFFORD MCCONNELL, LAURA  
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 
Related National Programs Global Change(204) Water Availability and Water Management(211)  							Last Modified: 01/10/2012 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
#### § 110.74 Marco Island, Marco River, Fla.

Beginning at a point approximately 300 feet east of the Captains Landing Docks at latitude 25°58′04′′ N., longitude 81°43′31′′ W.; thence 108°, 450 feet; thence 198°, 900 feet; thence 288°, 450 feet; thence 018°, 900 feet to the point of beginning.

Note:

The area is principally for use by yachts and other recreational craft. Fore and aft moorings will be allowed. Temporary floats or buoys for marking anchors in place will be allowed. Fixed mooring piles or stakes are prohibited. All moorings shall be so placed that no vessel, when anchored, shall at any time extend beyond the limits of the area.

[CGFR 70-53A, [35 FR 14506](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-14506), Sept. 16, 1970]
§ 118.85 Lights on vertical lift bridges. ( a ) *Lift span lights.* The vertical lift span of every vertical lift bridge shall be lighted so that the center of the navigable channel under the span will be marked by a range of two green lights when the vertical lift span is open for navigation, and by one red light on each side for all other positions of the lift span. The green lights shall each show through a horizontal arc of 360°; they shall be securely mounted just below the outermost edge of the bridge span structure so as to be visible from an approaching vessel. Each red light shall show through a horizontal arc of 180°, and shall be securely mounted just below the outermost edge of the lift span to show 90° on either side of the line parallel to the axis of the channel so that only one such light will be visible from an approaching vessel. Note:
Until such time that major repairs to or replacement of lift span navigation lights are made, it is permitted that these lights show through a horizontal arc of not more than 60°. When major repairs to or replacement of such existing lights are made they shall conform with this paragraph.
( b ) *Pier lights.* Every vertical lift bridge shall be lighted so that each end of every pier in or adjacent to navigable channels under the lift span, or each end of every protection pier when provided, will be marked by a red light. Each such light shall show through a horizontal arc of 180°, and shall be securely mounted as low as practicable on the end of the pier, or the protection pier, to show 90° on either side of a line parallel to the axis of the navigable channel so as to be visible from an approaching vessel.
( c ) *Axis lights.* Every lift bridge which has at least one pier provided with a protection pier shall be lighted so that the intersection of the lift span axis with the channel side of each pier adjacent to the navigable channel will be marked by a red light: *Provided,* That if every such pier, or protection pier, is straight along its channel face these lights shall not be required. Each such light shall show through a horizontal arc of 180°, and shall be securely mounted on the navigable channel face of the pier as low as practicable to show 90° on either side of a line normal to the axis of the navigable channel so as to be visible from an approaching vessel.
[40 FR 24898, June 11, 1975, as amended by CGD 75-046a, 42 FR 56954, Oct. 31, 1977]
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  October 22, 2009
    /s/ Lynn R. BlodgettLynn R. Blodgett, President andChief Executive Officer of
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
§ 13.01-20 Definitions. As used in the statutes cited and in the regulations in this subpart: ( a ) “Peril of the water” includes all perils on water caused by, or which are such by reason of, the sea or bodies of water such as lakes, bays, sounds and rivers; whenever, wherever and in whatever way human life is directly imperiled by the sea or a body of water is a peril of the water.
( b ) A “shipwreck” includes an incident threatening persons whose lives are endangered by perils of the water as well as those who are, strictly speaking, no longer in danger from the sea or a body of water, that peril already having passed, but who are in imminent danger and in great need of succor or rescue, as e.g., being adrift in an open boat or stranded on some barren coast where, without succor or rescue, they would die of starvation, thirst, or exposure.
( c ) “Waters within the United States or subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” embrace all waters within the United States, and any other waters over which the United States exercises jurisdiction.
Version 10.2018

Request for Change in Grantee Address

A Change in Grantee Address is requested when the organization’s physical address identified on the SF424 has changed. 

Documents Required

 A dated cover letter signed by the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) that 

includes:

o Grant Award Number(s) and Grantee Organization Name 

o New address

o Effective date of change of address

How to Submit Your Request:

All requests for Change in Grantee Address should be submitted by the grantee in Grants Management 

Module as a new amendment by accessing “Manage Amendments”, click “New”, select “ACL Change in 

Grantee Address”.

GrantSolutions has a training video showing grantees how to request and manage grant amendments –

which include no-cost extension requests. This video is at the bottom of this page.”
§ 125.47 Appeals. ( a ) The Commandant shall establish at Coast Guard Headquarters, Washington, DC, an Appeal Board to hear appeals provided for in this part. The Commandant shall designate for the Appeal Board a Chairman, who shall be so far as practicable, an officer of the Coast Guard. The Commandant shall designate, so far as practicable, a member from a panel of persons representing management nominated by the Secretary of Labor, and a member from a panel of persons representing labor nominated by the Secretary of Labor. The Commandant shall insure that persons designated as Appeal Board members have suitable security clearance. The Chairman of the Appeal Board shall make all arrangements incident to the business of the Appeal Board.
( b ) If an applicant or holder appeals to the Appeal Board within 20 days after receipt of notice of his right to appeal under this part, his appeal shall be handled under the same procedure as that specified in § 125.39, and the privilege of challenge may be exercised through the same procedure as that specified in § 125.41.
( c ) Appeal Board proceedings shall be conducted in the same manner as that specified in § 125.43.
& • ' ' - Smal l Airplan e Directorat e

U.S . Departmen t

^^ , . . . - .. . ofTroniortaHo n : - " i ' 3 " ' " : !'^ : ^*^'^"^ ^ ^h^?.'?2' ^ r ^ Ti.-..* « Kansa s City . M O 6410 6 AdminhlrdKo n 

### FEB l S 20t t Natha n Lachendr o Progra mManager , Kin g Ai r & Learje t

Product s Raisbec k Engineerin g 441 1 S . Rya n Wa

y Seattle , W A 9817 8 Dea r Mr . Lacbendro : Thi s lette r

i s t o informyo u tha t

w e hav e receive dan dbegu n processin g you r petitio n for exemption . I t

acknowledge s receip t

o f th e petitio n an ddescribe s ho w w e wil l proces s it . W e Hav e th e Petitio n W e hav e receive dyou r

January 17,201 2 petitio n o n behal f o f Raisebec k

Engineerin g (REI ) fo r an exemptio n from § 3.242(b ) o f th e Civi l Ai r

Regulation s (CA R3) . Thi s exemption , i f granted , woul dallo w RE I t o ad dHawke r Becchcraf

t aircraf t model s C90G T an dC90GT i t o Exemptio n Numbe r

5146A , allowin g th e maximumweigh t o f thes e model s t o increas e b y u p t o 100 0 pounds . W e hav e adde dyou r

petitio n t o th e pubH c docke t (No . FAA-2012-0054 ) an dw c ar e processin g it . W e wil l contac t yo u i f w e nee dadditional information . Ho w W e Wil l Proces s th e Petitio n A petitio n for

a n exemption , accordin g t o § 11.63(d) , mus t b e sen t t o th e FA A at

leas t 12 0 day s before th e propose deffectiv e date o f th e exemption . In addition , w e publis ha summary o f

th e petitio n i n th e Federa l Registe r for publi c commen t

unless , accordin g t o § 11.87 , w e determin e tha t goo dcaus e exist s for

no t publishin g it . Becaus e grantin g you r

petitio n woul dno t

se t aprecedent , w e hav e determine dtha t w e should no t delay actio n o n i t

b y publishin g it

fo r publi c comment . Therefore , w e hav e waive dth e requiremen t

for Federa l Registe r

publication . Eve n thoug hw e hav e waive dthi s requirement , yo u shouldno t

constru e thi s actio n t o b e approval o f you r request . W e v^il

l conside r full y th e fact s an dcircumstance s containe di n you r petitio n an dwil l proces s i t accordingly .

### W

e wil l advis e yo

u of the agency' s final decision on you r petition as soon a s possible . If yo u hav e any question s i n th e meantime , you ma y contact Rober t Stegema n a t (816 ) 329-4140 . Sincerely , Ear l Lawrenc e Manager , Smal

l Airplane Directorat

e Aircraf t Certification Servic e
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36030-36031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 3, 5, 47, and 49

[FAC 97-18; Item IX]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Technical Amendments

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Technical amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation in order to update references and make editorial changes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 6, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS 
Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR parts 3, 5, 47, and 49

    Government procurement.

    Dated: May 26, 2000.
Edward C. Loeb,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
    Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 3, 47, and 49 as 
set forth below:

    1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 3, 47, and 49 continues 
to read as follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
U.S.C. 2473(c).

PART 3--IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF 
INTEREST


3.303  [Amended]

    2. Amend section 3.303 in the first sentence of paragraph (a) by 
removing ``41 U.S.C. 253(B)(e) and 10 U.S.C. 2305(b)(5)'' and adding 
``41 U.S.C. 253b(i) and 10 U.S.C. 2305(b)(9)'' in its place.

PART 5--PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

    3. Revise the last sentence of section 5.204 to read as follows:

[[Page 36031]]

5.204  Presolicitation notices.

    * * * Synopsizing of a proposed contract action is required prior 
to issuance of any resulting solicitation (see 5.201 and 5.203).

PART 47--TRANSPORTATION


47.504  [Amended]

    4. In section 47.504, amend the first sentence of paragraph (e) by 
removing ``(see 12.504(a)(13))'' and adding ``(see 12.504(a)(11))'' in 
its place.

PART 49--TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

    5. Remove ``19...'' and add ``20__'' in the following places:
    a. Section 49.601-1 in paragraphs (a) and (b); and
    b. Section 49.601-2 in paragraph (a) of the Notice of Termination 
to Prime Contractors; in paragraph (i) in the Acknowledgment of Notice; 
and in paragraph (a) of the Alternate notice.

[FR Doc. 00-13825 Filed 6-1-00; 4:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
Submitted on record and briefs August 10,

reversed September 9, 1992

#### In the Matter of Rhonda Jo Brown, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*Rhonda Jo BROWN, *Appellant.*

(92-0030MC; CA A73730)

836 P2d 1377

Ronald K. Cue, Ashland, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Michael D. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, and John R. Payne, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Durham, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*172PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, the state concedes that the trial court erred in finding that appellant is a mentally ill person in need of commitment.

Appellant seems to concede that she has a mental disorder. The medical examiner diagnosed her as suffering from schizophrenia. However, appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the trial court’s finding that appellant is unable to meet her basic needs or is dangerous to others. We accept the concession.

Reversed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SEC. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the filing by Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”)of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2005 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Barry M.  Portnoy |                                   | /s/ David J.  Hegarty |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barry M. Portnoy      | David J. Hegarty                       |
| Managing Trustee      | President and  Chief Operating Officer |
|                  |                                   |
|                  |                                   |
| /s/ Gerard M.  Martin |                                   | /s/ John R.  Hoadley  |   |
| Gerard M. Martin      | John R. Hoadley                        |
| Managing Trustee      | Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 127.403 Inspections.

The operator must conduct a visual inspection for defects of each pressure-relief device not capable of being tested, at least once each calendar year, with intervals between inspections not exceeding 15 months, and make all repairs in accordance with § 127.405.

[CGD 78-038, 53 FR 3376, Feb. 7, 1988, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
EXHIBIT B

      3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation (change name
      to Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            XENOGEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                           (Pursuant to Section 242 of
                      the Delaware General Corporation Law)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The undersigned. Jehu Hand, being the President and Secretary of Xenogen
Technology, Inc. (the "Corporation") doe; hereby certify that:

1.    The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended pursuant to Section
      242(a)(1) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware to
      change the name of the Corporation by striking Article FIRST in its
      entirety and replacing therefor:

"FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Vertical Computer Systems, Inc."

2.    The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended pursuant to Section
      242(a) of the General Corporation Law of the Scare of Delaware to add
      thereto the following as Article TWELVETH:

      "TWELVETH: The Corporation expressly elects nor to be subject to Section
      203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law."

3.    The foregoing Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation were first
      authorized by the Board of Directors and subsequently duly adopted by the
      sole stockholder holding all of the Corporation's outstanding stock
      entitled to vote thereon in accordance with Section 228 of the General
      Corporation Law of the Scare of Delaware.

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Amendment this 6th day of April, 1992 and DO HEREBY CERTIFY under the penalties
of perjury that the facts stated in this Certificate of Amendment are true and
correct and are of our own knowledge.


                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jehu Hand
                                          President


                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jehu Hand
                                          Secretary
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

(1)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155
#### § 780.153 Delivery “to storage.”

The term “delivery to storage” includes taking agricultural or horticultural commodities, dairy products, livestock, bees or their honey, fur-bearing animals or their pelts, or poultry to the places where they are to be stored or held pending preparation for or delivery to market. The fact that the commodities have been subjected to some other practice “by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations” does not preclude the inclusion of “delivery to storage” within section 3(f). The same is true with respect to “delivery to market” and “delivery to carriers for transporation to market.”