alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 118.30 Action by Coast Guard. ( a ) The District Commander receiving the application will review it and approve the lights and other signals proposed, or mark on the drawings, the lights and other signals required, and in the case of lights, cite the applicable section of this chapter which prescribes the lights required for the particular type bridge.
( b ) Upon approval, one set of drawings will be returned to the applicant with the notation “navigational lights and/or other signals approved as shown”, date, name and title of the District Commander.
#### In the Matter of Eilene Golf, as Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd Golf, Deceased, Respondent, v New York State Department of Social Services et al., Appellants.

Submitted May 13, 1996;

decided July 9, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC00-90-000]

Take notice that on May 22, 2000, P&L Coal Holdings Corporation (P&L), Edison Mission Energy (Mission), and Citizens Power LLC (collectively, Applicants) filed a supplement to their Application for Order Authorizing Sale of Equity Interests filed on May 12, 2000 in this docket. The supplement consists of the Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Mission, P&L and Gold Fields Mining Corporation, to meet the Exhibit H requirements of Part 33 of the filing requirements. Applicants request privileged treatment for the Purchase and Sale Agreement, pursuant to 18 CFR 388.112 of the Commission's Regulations.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14127  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.971 Neches River. ( a ) The draw of the Kansas City Southern automated bridge, mile 19.5, at Beaumont, is not constantly manned and is operated from a remote site in Shreveport, Louisiana. The bridge is normally maintained in the closed to navigation position, providing 13 feet of vertical clearance above mean high tide. This bridge will open on signal. ( 1 ) Mariners may request a bridge opening at anytime via one of the following methods: ( i ) Telephone at 1-800-892-6295;
( ii ) Marine radio on VHF-FM Channel 16; or
( iii ) Proper sound signal as prescribed in § 117.15.
( 2 ) When signaling by sound, if return sound signal is not sent from the remote bridge operator, in compliance with § 117.15, contact the remote operator via telephone or marine radio.
( 3 ) An audible warning siren will sound when the bridge is in motion. Video cameras will constantly monitor the waterway near and under the draw. Once a vessel has passed through the bridge, the draw will lower, provided the infrared “under bridge” presence detector and video cameras reveal nothing under the draw.
( b ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge, mile 53.9 at Evadale, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD 08-00-026, 65 FR 71059, Nov. 29, 2000; USCG-2011-0257, 76 FR 31837, June 2, 2011]
```

[House Document 107-48]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-48

               2001 TRADE POLICY AGENDA AND 2000 ANNUAL

 
                REPORT ON THE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   THE 2001 TRADE POLICY AGENDA AND 2000 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE TRADE 
           AGREEMENTS PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2213(a)

    March 6, 2001.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed
                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
89-011                     WASHINGTON : 2001

To the Congress of the United States:
    As required by section 163 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 2213), I transmit herewith the 2001 Trade 
Policy Agenda and 2000 Annual Report on the Trade Agreements 
Program.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, March 6, 2001.
    
    

```
§ 151.2040 Discharge of ballast water in extraordinary circumstances. ( a ) The Coast Guard will allow the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of a vessel that cannot practicably meet the requirements of § 151.2025(a) of this subpart, either because its voyage does not take it into waters 200 nautical miles or greater from any shore for a sufficient length of time and the vessel retains ballast water onboard or because the master of the vessel has identified safety or stability concerns, to discharge ballast water in areas other than the Great Lakes and the Hudson River north of the George Washington Bridge. ( 1 ) The Coast Guard will not allow such a discharge if the vessel is required to have a Coast Guard-approved ballast water management system (BWMS) per the implementation schedule found in § 151.2035(b) of this subpart.
( 2 ) If the Coast Guard allows the discharge of ballast water as described in paragraph (a) of this section, the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of the vessel must discharge only that amount of ballast water operationally necessary to ensure the safety of the vessel for cargo operations.
( 3 ) Ballast water records must be made available to the local Captain of the Port (COTP) upon request.
( 4 ) Vessels on a voyage to the Great Lakes or the Hudson River north of the George Washington Bridge must comply with the requirements of 33 CFR 151.1515.
( b ) If the installed BWMS required by this subpart stops operating properly during a voyage, or the vessel's BWM method is unexpectedly unavailable, the person directing the movement of the vessel must ensure that the problem is reported to the nearest COTP or District Commander as soon as practicable. The vessel may continue to the next port of call, subject to the directions of the COTP or District Commander, as provided by part 160 of this chapter. ( 1 ) The Coast Guard will normally allow a vessel that cannot practicably meet the requirements of § 151.2025(a)(1) of this subpart because its installed BWMS is inoperable, or the vessel's BWM method is unexpectedly unavailable, to employ one of the other ballast water management (BWM) methods listed in § 151.2025(a) of this subpart.
( 2 ) If the master of the vessel determines that the vessel cannot employ other BWM methods due to the voyage or safety concerns listed in paragraph (a) of this section, the Coast Guard will normally allow the vessel to discharge ballast water in areas other than the Great Lakes and the Hudson River north of the George Washington Bridge.
( 3 ) If the Coast Guard approves such an allowance, the vessel must discharge only that amount of ballast water operationally necessary to ensure the safety and stability of the vessel for cargo operations. Ballast water records must be made available to the local COTP upon request.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart relieves the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of a vessel of any responsibility, including ensuring the safety and stability of the vessel and the safety of the crew and passengers.
ACL Help American Vote Act for PA (PAVA) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2020 Final Allocation

8/6/2020

State/Territory

OIDD Help 

American Vote Act 

for P&A (PAVA)

Alabama $105,261

Alaska $105,261

Arizona $105,261

Arkansas $105,261

California $514,881

Colorado $105,261

Connecticut $105,261

Delaware $105,261

District of Columbia $105,261

Florida $277,235

Georgia $136,923

Hawaii $105,261

Idaho $105,261

Illinois $165,840

Indiana $105,261

Iowa $105,261

Kansas $105,261

Kentucky $105,261

Louisiana $105,261

Maine $105,261

Maryland $105,261

Massachusetts $105,261

Michigan $130,108

Minnesota $105,261

Mississippi $105,261

Missouri $105,261

Montana $105,261

Nebraska $105,261

Nevada $105,261

New Hampshire $105,261

New Jersey $115,955

New Mexico $105,261

New York $254,365

North Carolina $135,155

North Dakota $105,261

Ohio $152,152

Oklahoma $105,261

Oregon $105,261

Pennsylvania $166,699

Rhode Island $105,261

South Carolina $105,261

South Dakota $105,261

Tennessee $105,261

Texas $373,588

Utah $105,261

Vermont $105,261

Virginia $110,868

Washington $105,261

West Virginia $105,261

Wisconsin $105,261

Wyoming $105,261

American Samoa $52,630

Guam $52,630

Puerto Rico $105,261

Virgin Islands $52,630

TOTAL $6,902,099
§ 154.1016 Facility classification by COTP. ( a ) The COTP may upgrade the classification of: ( 1 ) An MTR facility not specified in § 154.1015 (b) or (c) to a facility that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment; or
( 2 ) An MTR facility specified in § 154.1015(b) to a facility that could reasonably be expected to cause significant and substantial harm to the environment.
( b ) The COTP may downgrade, the classification of: ( 1 ) An MTR facility specified in § 154.1015(c) to a facility that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment; or
( 2 ) An MTR facility specified in § 154.1015(b) to a facility that could not reasonably be expected to cause substantial, or significant and substantial harm to the environment.
( 3 ) The COTP will consider downgrading an MTR facility's classification only upon receiving a written request for a downgrade of classification from the facility's owner or operator.
( c ) When changing a facility classification the COTP may, as appropriate, consider all relevant factors including, but not limited to: Type and quantity of oils handled in bulk; facility spill history; age of facility; proximity to public and commercial water supply intakes; proximity to navigable waters based on the definition of navigable waters in 33 CFR 2.36; and proximity to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments.
[CGD 91-036, 61 FR 7917, Feb. 29, 1996, as amended by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35014, June 19, 2008]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(Subsection (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

** **
| July 31, 2006 |       /s/  Joseph Macnow         |
|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Name: Joseph Macnow                                            |
|          | Title: Executive Vice  President and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo116423 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
The Aging Network

Program Instructions

AOA-PI-01-04 March 8, 2001

TO: STATE AND AREA AGENCIES ON AGING ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER THE OLDER AMERICANS 

ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED

SUBJECT: Certification on Maintenance of Effort for Title III - Fiscal Year 2000

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES: 45 CFR 1321.49; and Section 309(c) of the Older Americans 

Act, as Amended

This program instruction requests the authorized official in each state agency on aging to submit a 

certification on maintenance of effort under Title III of the Older Americans Act for fiscal year 2000. As 

set forth in 45 CFR 1321.49, the state agency maintenance of effort level is to be determined 

annually:

"In order to avoid a penalty, each fiscal year the State Agency, to meet the required nonfederal share 

applicable to its allotments under this part, shall spend under the State plan for both services and 

administration at least the average amount of state funds it spent under the plan for the three 

previous fiscal years. If the State Agency spends less than this amount, the Assistant Secretary 

reduces the State's allotments for supportive and nutrition services under this part by a percentage 

equal to the percentage by which the State reduced its expenditures."

In reporting the amount of state expenditures for the maintenance of effort requirement, states may 

include expenditures incurred under the cost allocation plan for the state agency. The authorized 

official in each state agency is requested to certify to the Administration on Aging the amount of state 

resources expended in fiscal year 2000 to meet the maintenance of effort requirements under Title III 

of the Older Americans Act, and whether that amount was or was not equal to the required 

maintenance of effort level.

Attached is a certification form which has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). The certification form must be signed by the authorized state agency official and submitted to 

the Regional Administrators, Administration on Aging, no later than April 13, 2001.

DUE DATE : Due April 13, 2001, to Regional Administrators, Administration on Aging.

ATTACHMENT : Certification of Maintenance of Effort Form OMB-0980-0180

INQUIRIES : State agencies should address inquiries to Regional Administrators, Administration on 

Aging, HHS Regional Offices.
Norman L. Thompson

Acting Principal Assistant Secretary for Aging
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Ronald R. Remick, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2005 ofK-Tron International, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 3, 2005 RONALD R. REMICK     Ronald R. Remick  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
*The Iowa Guide for Menu Planning can be used as a guide to develop emergency, shelf stable, grocery, and restaurant meals for sack lunches/to-go meals, etc. The following 2 Week Shelf Stable menu, 10 Meal Grocery Kit, and 20 Meal Shelf Stable Emergency Response Kit are RD approved. Substitutions are allowed using the guide. Also to note, there are many menu ideas and resources in the state Food Processor database. Reach out to Alexandra Bauman, RD LDN with questions at**Alexandra.bauman@iowa.gov**.*

# Iowa Menu Approval Sheet

Iowa Guide for Menu Planning

Menu Dates: ______________________________________________________________ 

Locations menu will be used: _________________________________________________

Additional Instructions: A food item in one or more food group can only be classified once as meeting the requirement for a meal.  For example: cottage cheese can be counted as a Milk/Milk alternative *or* a Lean Protein source, not both. 

Nutrient-rich desserts that include fruit, whole grains, and low-fat milk can count toward meeting the appropriate food group required servings.

I certify to the best of my knowledge these menus provide one-third of the current Dietary Reference Intakes for individuals aged 60 years and older and conforms to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Dietitian Signature___Alexandra Bauman, RD LDN_____________________Date_March 17, 2020__________

Iowa License Number__087213_____________

Email address___alexandra.bauman@iowa.gov__________

## 2 Week Shelf Stable Menu 

2 Week Shelf Stable Menu Grocery List: 

· 

· 10 individual 6 ounce fruit or vegetable juice (or 60 ounce fruit or vegetable juice)

· 4- 4 ounce fruit or applesauce cups

· 2 small box raisins (1 ounce each)

· 12 ounces canned meat or tuna (3- 5 ounce cans)

· 3 Tablespoons peanut butter (2- 0.75 packets or just give 1 small jar) 

· 3 cereal bars

· 1 packet instant oatmeal

· 1- 15 ounce can beef stew, 1- 14.5 ounce can vegetables, 1- 8 ounce package dried red beans and rice, 1- 14.5 ounce can spaghetti and meatballs, 1- 10.75 ounce can chicken and noodle soup

· 36 crackers (~1 sleeve of saltines, ritz, 1 package grahams, etc.)

· 1 individual box dried cereal

· 2- 4 ounce pudding cups

· 3 packet mayonnaise and 1 packet relish

· 10 ounce powdered skim milk (or 100 ounce shelf-stable milk)

10 Meal Emergency Grocery Kit**:**

Choose one from each section:

## Shelf Stable Emergency Response Kit for 20 Meals
§ 140.205 Subpoenas. ( a ) In any investigation conducted pursuant to this subchapter, the investigating officer shall have the power to administer necessary oaths, subpoena witnesses, and require the production of books, papers, documents, and any other evidence.
( b ) Attendance of witnesses or the production of books, papers, documents, or any other evidence shall be compelled by a process similar to that used in the District Courts of the United States.
<PAGE>





                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

              DIVERSIFIED SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Entity Name                            Jurisdiction
-----------                            ------------
<S>                                     <C>
Registrant:

Diversified Security Solutions, Inc.      Delaware

Subsidiaries:

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.           New Jersey

Viscom Products, Inc.                     Delaware

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.           California

Henry Bros. Electronics, LLC               Arizona

National Safe of California, Inc.       California

Airorlite Communications, Inc.          New Jersey
</TABLE>
#### § 100.700 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13763]



[[Page 35332]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board Closed Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology 
Advisory Board has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: 19 June 2000 (900 a.m. to 1400 p.m.).

ADDRESSES: Thomas, Ramo, Wooldridge (TRW), 12900 Federal Systems Park 
Drive, Fairfax, VA 22033.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maj Donald R. Culp, Jr., USAF, 
Executive Secretary, DIA Science and Technology Advisory Board, 
Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(l), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code, and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: May 26, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-13763 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M