alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 390 

Designating March 11, 2008, as National Funeral Director and Mortician 

Recognition Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. 

BROWN, and Mr. CHAMBLISS) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MARCH 11, 2008 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 11, 2008, as National Funeral Director 

and Mortician Recognition Day. 

Whereas the death of a family member, friend, or loved one 

is a devastating emotional event; 

Whereas the memorialization and celebration of the decedent’s life is the fabric of today’s funeral service; 

Whereas the family of the decedent has traditionally looked 

to funeral directors and morticians for consolation, 

strength, and guidance in the planning and implementation of a meaningful funeral ceremony; 

Whereas funeral directors and morticians have dedicated 

their professional lives to serving the families of their 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

SRES 390 ATS 

communities in their times of need for generations with 

caring, compassion, and integrity; 

Whereas these special men and women see their chosen profession as a higher calling, a sacred trust, in serving 

every family regardless of social standing, financial 

means, or time of day or day of the year, whenever a 

death occurs; and 

Whereas on this special day, March 11, 2008, it would be appropriate to pay tribute to these funeral directors and 

morticians who, day in and day out, assist our Nation’s 

families in their times of sadness and grief and help families mourn a death and celebrate a life: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) takes this opportunity to pay the Nation’s 

3 collective debt of gratitude for all the hours and all 

4 the times they have put someone ahead of them5 selves by serving the living while caring for the dead; 

6 (2) urges every American of every walk of life 

7 to embrace each of these special individuals with 

8 heartfelt thanks for their dedication to their profes9 sion; and 

10 (3) designates March 11, 2008, as ‘‘National 

11 Funeral Director and Mortician Recognition Day’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
SUGAR AND SWEETENER SITUATION AND OUTLOOK Yearbook SSS-225 (PDF)       
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This report is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831.  A summary in ASCII form was
released on May 18, 1999.

The Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook is published two times a year and 
supplemented by a yearbook.  To order, call 1-800-999-6779 in the United States 
or Canada.  Other areas please call (703) 605-6220.  Or write ERS-NASS, 5285 
Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA.  22161.

Please note that this publication is in .PDF format and 465 KB in size.
Acrobat Reader 3.0 or later is required to view and print this document.
The Adobe Acrobat .PDF format is used to preserve all the layout and
content used in the original publication. To download and get help using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, please go to:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

For More Information on ERS Publications and Data
*************************************************
Visit the ERS web site at:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov

Other reports are available from the Products and Services
area on the ERS web site from:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/periodic.htm

For sales information on ERS publications, go to:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/sales.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
END_OF_FILE
§ 100.721 Special Local Regulations; Clearwater Super Boat National Championship, Gulf of Mexico; Clearwater Beach, FL. ( a ) *Regulated Areas.* The following regulated areas are established as special local regulations. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983. ( 1 ) *Race Area.* All waters of the Gulf of Mexico contained within the following points: 27°58.67′ N, 82°50.32′ W, thence to position 27°58.60′ N, 82°49.98′ W, thence to position 28°00.88′ N, 82°50.35′ W, thence to position 28°00.80′ N, 82°49.90′ W, thence back to the original position, 28°58.67′ N, 82°50.32′ W.
( 2 ) *Spectator Area.* All waters of Gulf of Mexico seaward no less than 150 yards from the race area and as agreed upon by the Coast Guard and race officials.
( 3 ) *Enforcement Area.* All waters of the Gulf of Mexico encompassed within the following points: 28°58.67′ N, 82°50.62′ W, thence to position 28°00.95′ N, 82°49.75′ W, thence to position 27°58.53′ N, 82°50.53′ W, thence to position 27°58.38′ N, 82°49.88′ W, thence back to position 28°58.67′ N, 82°50.62′ W.
( b ) *Definition.* The term “designated representative” means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the Race Area unless an authorized race participant.
( 2 ) Designated representatives may control vessel traffic throughout the enforcement area as determined by the prevailing conditions.
( 3 ) All vessels are to be anchored and/or operate at a No Wake Speed in the spectator area. On-scene designated representatives will direct spectator vessels to the spectator area.
( 4 ) Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated areas by contacting the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824-7506, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization is granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.
( d ) *Enforcement Date.* This section will be enforced annually from approximately 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. EDT daily the last Saturday and Sunday of September.
[USCG-2014-0657, 80 FR 3882, Jan. 26, 2015]
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.696 What are the requirements for a helicopter landing deck safety net?

A helicopter landing deck safety net must comply with 46 CFR 108.235.
§ 553.50 Records to be kept of compensatory time. For each employee subject to the compensatory time and compensatory time off provisions of section 7(o) of the Act, a public agency which is a State, a political subdivision of a State or an interstate governmental agency shall maintain and preserve records containing the basic information and data required by § 516.2 of this title and, in addition: ( a ) The number of hours of compensatory time earned pursuant to section 7(o) each workweek, or other applicable work period, by each employee at the rate of one and one-half hour for each overtime hour worked;
( b ) The number of hours of such compensatory time used each workweek, or other applicable work period, by each employee;
( c ) The number of hours of compensatory time compensated in cash, the total amount paid and the date of such payment; and
( d ) Any collective bargaining agreement or written understanding or agreement with respect to earning and using compensatory time off. If such agreement or understanding is not in writing, a record of its existence must be kept.
§ 97.23 Period of availability of funds. ( a ) *General.* Where a funding period is specified, a grantee may charge to the award only costs resulting from obligations of the funding period unless carryover of unobligated balances is permitted, in which case the carryover balances may be charged for costs resulting from obligations of the subsequent funding period.
( b ) *Liquidation of obligations.* A grantee must liquidate all obligations incurred under the award not later than 90 days after the end of the funding period (or as specified in a program regulation) to coincide with the submission of the annual Financial Status Report (SF-269). The Federal agency may extend this deadline at the request of the grantee.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, February 2, 2011; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS:  Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 25, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2036 Filed 1-26-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit (21)


                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE MEAD CORPORATION*



                                                State of Jurisdiction
          Name                                      of Incorporation
          ----                                  ---------------------

          Escanaba Paper Company                     Michigan
          Forest Kraft Company                       Delaware
          MCB Woodlands and Services, Inc.           Alabama
          Mead Coated Board, Inc.                    Delaware
          Mead Emballage, S.A.                       France
          Mead Oxford Corporation                    Delaware
          Mead Panelboard, Inc.                      Ohio
          Mead Verpakking B.V.                       Amsterdam

          --------------

          *  The names of additional subsidiaries have been omitted because the
             unnamed subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single
             subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
             Subsidiaries which are consolidated into the above-listed
             subsidiaries are also omitted.
#### MURTHA FLOOD, Respondent, *v.*CALEB W. MITCHELL, Appellant.

*Evidence*— *what draft of contract inadmissible as evidence of agreement between pm'ties.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury.

The action was brought for work done in building or grading a race track. The answer denied the allegations of the complaint, and set up a contract by which plaintiff agreed to finish the track; alleged that he had neglected to do so, and claimed damages therefor. The court *held,*that the draft of a contract, unexecuted, drawn up in. accordance with what the person drawing it supposed to be the agreement between the parties, but which did not contain their language, was not admissible in evidence. That the cases of *Halsey*v. *Sinsebaugh*(15 N. Y., 485), and *Russell*v. *H. R. R. R. Co.*(17 id., 134), did not authorize such evidence.

The jury found in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed.

*A. Pond,*for the appellant.

*L. B. Pike,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0514

_________________

JIM L. TOWSLEY and BETTY SMITH 

TOWSLEY,

 Plaintiffs and Appellees,

 v.

DAVID P. STANZAK, MARGO L. STANZAK, 

CRAIG FITCH, CARYN MISKE, LAURENCE B, 

MILLER, JR., STEPHEN M. ZANDI, KARIN M. 

ZANDI, and all persons, known or unknown, 

claiming or who might claim any right, title,

interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the 

personal property described in the Complaint 

below which is adverse to the Plaintiff's ownership 

or a cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto, whether 

such a claim or possible claim may be present or 

contingent,

 Defendants and Appellants.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellees’ motion to substitute the appellee in this matter, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to substitute Appellee is GRANTED, and this 

cause shall be captioned as above.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2021

12/22/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0514
§ 125.17 Persons eligible for Coast Guard Port Security Cards. ( a ) Only the following persons may be issued Coast Guard Port Security Cards: ( 1 ) Persons regularly employed on vessels or on waterfront facilities.
( 2 ) Persons having regular public or private business connected with the operation, maintenance, or administration of vessels, their cargoes, or waterfront facilities.
( b ) A holder of a Merchant Mariner's Document shall not be issued a Port Security Card, unless his Merchant Mariner's Document is surrendered to the Coast Guard. In this connection, see § 125.09.
[CGFR 62-39, 27 FR 11259, Nov. 15, 1962, as amended by CGD 77-228, 43 FR 53427, Nov. 16, 1978]
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**
| **Parent**                        | ** ** | **Subsidiary**                  | ** ** | **Percent  of Ownership** | ** ** | **State of****Incorporation orOrganization** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|------------|---------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------|
| First OttawaBancshares, Inc. |       | The FirstNational Bankof Ottawa |       | 100%                      |       | National Bank, Illinois                      |
| The FirstNational Bankof Ottawa   |       | First OttawaFinancialCorp.      |       | 100%                      |       | Delaware                                     |

 

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Patrick J. Allin, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Patron Systems,
Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 25, 2003

/s/ Patrick J. Allin
--------------------------
Patrick J. Allin
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Order filed January 23, 2012 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-10-00759-CV

____________

CONNIE VASQUEZ HARRISON, Appellant

V.

CLIFFORD LAYNE HARRISON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-68864

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed January 7, 2011. Our review has determined that a relevant 

item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not 

contain correct docket sheet.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or 

before February 01, 2012, containing corrected docket sheet.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of 

the case file.

PER CURIAM
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

583 KA 10-01433 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEVIN NATER-VAZQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., J.), entered June 9, 2010. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ). Defendant contends that County Court erred in agreeing with the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that an upward departure from the presumptive risk level was warranted inasmuch as the court relied upon factors already taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. That contention is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not preserved for our review ( see People v Staples , 37 AD3d 1099, lv denied 8 NY3d 813). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit.

Entered: April 27, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 114.20 Departure from permit plans. ( a ) If the final inspection shows a minor departure from the authorized plans which does not materially affect navigation, the permittee will be required to furnish as-built plans showing the work as actually constructed but no further action will be taken by the Coast Guard.
( b ) It is not the practice of the Coast Guard to issue letters certifying that completed work conforms to that which was authorized. That question is a matter of fact to be determined in case of controversy by the usual rules of court procedure.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17769, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37314, June 21, 2012]
§ 96.53 Audit resolution generally. The DOL official(s) responsible for audit resolution shall promptly evaluate findings and recommendations reported by auditors and the corrective action plan developed by the recipient to determine proper actions in response to audit findings and recommendations. The process of audit resolution includes at a minimum an initial determination, an informal resolution period, and a final determination. ( a ) *Initial determination.* After the conclusion of any comment period for audits provided the recipient/contractor, the responsible DOL official(s) shall make an initial determination on the allowability of questioned costs or activities, administrative or systemic findings, and the corrective actions outlined by the recipient. Such determination shall be based on applicable statutes, regulations, administrative directives, or terms and conditions of the grant/contract award instrument.
( b ) *Informal resolution.* The recipient/contractor shall have a reasonable period of time (as determined by the DOL official(s) responsible for audit resolution) from the date of issuance of the initial determination to informally resolve those matters in which the recipient/contractor disagrees with the decisions of the responsible DOL official(s).
( c ) *Final determination.* After the conclusion of the informal resolution period, the responsible DOL official(s) shall issue a final determination that: ( 1 ) As appropriate, indicate that efforts to informally resolve matters contained in the initial determination have either been successful or unsuccessful;
( 2 ) Lists those matters upon which the parties continue to disagree;
( 3 ) Lists any modifications to the factual findings and conclusions set forth in the initial determination;
( 4 ) Lists any sanctions and required corrective actions; and
( 5 ) Sets forth any appeal rights.
( d ) *Time limit.* Insofar as possible, the requirements of this section should be met within 180 days of the date the final approved audit report is received by the DOL official(s) responsible for audit resolution.