alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ES00-36-001]

Take notice that on May 18, 2000, Electric Energy, Inc. (EEInc.) filed an amendment to its application seeking authorization to issue from time to time during the period from June 1, 2000 through May 31, 2002 (a) up to $120 million of new long-term debt with a maturity of up to 15 years, and (b) new short-term debt with the aggregate amount outstanding at any time not to exceed $70 million. EEInc. requests that such authorization be granted instead for a period from June 15, 2000, through June 14, 2002. In addition, EEInc. modified its application to reflect the possibility that the final terms of issuance may be somewhat different from those described in the application. EEInc. requests that a revised page 5 be substituted for that previously submitted with the original application to this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of                           ( print page 35913)                        Practices and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 7, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                 

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14123  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
aJ lJ.NIVERSITY 

~ ::WYOMING 

Michael Martin 

Transportation Industry Analyst 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

June 25, 2012 

The University of Wyoming strongly supports the Laramie Regional Airpmi Board of Directors' 

decision to identify a new preferred carrier for Laramie. As the letter from the airport board states, UW 

joins other civic leaders in supporting a change in carriers to Sky West and welcoming the stability that 

a United Airlines affiliate carrier could bring to the community. 

The University of Wyoming is the largest employer in Laramie with many professors, 

administrators, and other professionals traveling to attend national and international meetings; serve on 

boards, committees, and review panels; and conduct research. The vast majority of these trips require a 

connection through Denver International Airport to reach a final national or international destination. 

Over the past several years, and in reaction to the quality of present air service out of Laramie Regional 

Airport, employees are electing to drive the two and a half hours to DIA rather than risk missing critical 

connections. As a result, I believe UW employees are substantial contributors to the "leakage" problem 

highlighted in the airport board's letter. 

This does not begin to address the travel needs of the hundreds of visitors to UW-members of 

governing boards, donors, alumni, parents, consultants, regulatory officers, speakers, and performerswho make the decision (or have UW employees decide for them) not to fly into Laramie in order to 

avoid issues related to unreliable air service. Time and again, it has proven to be more efficient and 

economical to spend the time driving to Laramie, even in bad weather, than to have special guests wait 

in airports or spend an extra night in Denver until the next flight to Laramie is available . . ,

UW joins in the airport board's conclusion that a new carrier serving Laramie is perhaps the 

only solution to rectify the decreasing number of hoardings currently experienced at Laramie Regional 

Airport. A change in carriers would not only support the Laramie community in general, but could have 

a very positive impact on the travel required by the University of Wyoming. 

cc: Laramie Regional Airport Board 

Sincerely, 

Thomas Buchanan 

President 

Office of the President 

Dept. 3434 • 1000 E. University Avenue • Laramie, WY 82071 

(307) 766-4121 • fax: (307) 766-4126
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.105 What are the requirements for the overflow and relief valves? ( a ) Each oil and natural gas transfer system (OTS/NGTS) must include a relief valve that, when activated, prevents pressure on any component of the OTS/NGTS from exceeding its maximum rated pressure.
( b ) The transfer system overflow or relief valve must not allow a discharge into the sea.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.215 What if a port has plans for a deep draft channel and harbor? ( a ) If a State port will be directly connected by pipeline to a proposed deepwater port, and has existing plans for a deep draft channel and harbor, a representative of the port may request a determination under 33 U.S.C. 1503(d).
( b ) The request must be sent, in writing, to the Commandant (CG-5P) within 30 days after the date that the notice of application for the deepwater port is published in the Federal Register.
( c ) The request must contain: ( 1 ) A signature of the highest official of the port submitting the request;
( 2 ) A copy of the existing plans for the construction of a deep draft channel and harbor;
( 3 ) Certification that the port has an active study by the Secretary of the Army for the construction of a deep draft channel and harbor, or that the port has an application pending for a permit under 33 U.S.C. 403 for the construction;
( 4 ) Any available documentation on: ( i ) Initial costs, by phases if development is staged, for the proposed onshore project, including dredging, ship terminal, and attendant facilities;
( ii ) Estimated annual operating expenses, by phases if development is staged, including labor, for 30 years for all elements of the project;
( iii ) Estimated completion time for all elements of the project;
( iv ) Estimated vessel traffic volume, and the volume and variety of the tonnage;
( v ) Potential traffic congestion conditions in the port, and the port's ability to control vessel traffic as a result of the proposed dredging project;
( vi ) Estimated economic benefits of the project, including: ( A ) Economic contribution to the local and regional area;
( B ) Induced industrial development;
( C ) Increased employment; and
( D ) Increases in tax revenues;
( vii ) Environmental and social impacts of the project on the local and regional community; and
( viii ) An estimate of the economic impact that the deepwater port license will have on the proposed project.
( d ) A statement whether the port seeks a determination that the port best serves the national interest.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51963-51964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-122-000]


Cobra Pipeline Ltd.; Notice of Baseline Filings

    Take notice that on August 12, 2011, Cobra Pipeline Ltd. submitted 
a revised baseline filing of their Statement of Operating Conditions 
for services provided under Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act 
of 1978 (NGPA).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party

[[Page 51964]]

must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or 
before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest on or before the intervention or 
protest date need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons 
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

    Dated: August 12, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-21157 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FILEDIN COURTOFAPPEALS 12thCourtofAppealsDistrict

CATHYS. LUSK,CLE

FILE COPY
RE: Case No. 15-0189 DATE: 3/3/2015 COA #: 12-14-00299-CV TC#: 3-41298 STYLE: MICHAEL KENNEDY v. THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AUSTIN, TEXAS, ET AL. A petition for review was filed today in the above

### styled case. Respondent may file either a response, or a waiver of response. If you file a waiver, the Court will not grant the petition without first requesting a response.

(Tex. R. App. P. 53.3) There is no fee for a response or a waiver. MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 2009
    
    2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005Income before Taxes & Cumulative
Effect of Change In Accounting Principle
    
    $
    52,610
    
    
    $
    4,007
    
    
    $
    (32,041
    )
    
    $
    65,709
    
    
    $
    110,594Plus: Fixed
Charges Interest expenseDeposits
    
    
    79,473
    
    
    
    152,452
    
    
    
    191,415
    
    
    
    173,380
    
    
    
    122,212Other
    
    
    50,958
    
    
    
    91,997
    
    
    
    171,116
    
    
    
    154,334
    
    
    
    90,371Total
    
    
    130,431
    
    
    
    244,449
    
    
    
    362,531
    
    
    
    327,714
    
    
    
    212,583Rent Expense
    
    
    5,186
    
    
    
    4,523
    
    
    
    3,574
    
    
    
    3,423
    
    
    
    2,309Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    135,617
    
    
    
    248,972
    
    
    
    366,105
    
    
    
    331,137
    
    
    
    214,892Earnings
    
    $
    188,227
    
    
    $
    252,979
    
    
    $
    334,064
    
    
    $
    396,846
    
    
    $
    325,486Ratio of Earnings to fixed chargesIncluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.39
    x
    
    
    1.02
    x
    
    
    0.91
    x
    
    
    1.20
    x
    
    
    1.51
    xExcluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.94
    x
    
    
    1.04
    x
    
    
    0.82
    x
    
    
    1.42
    x
    
    
    2.19
    xFixed charges
    
    
    135,617
    
    
    
    248,972
    
    
    
    366,105
    
    
    
    331,137
    
    
    
    214,892Earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividendIncluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.39
    x
    
    
    1.02
    x
    
    
    0.91
    x
    
    
    1.20
    x
    
    
    1.51
    xExcluding interest on deposits
    
    
    1.94
      x
    
    
    1.04
    x
    
    
    0.82
    x
    
    
    1.42
    x
    
    
    2.19
    x
### 11 th 

### Court of Appeals Mandate

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

T O T HE C OUNTY C OURT AT L AW N O

. 2 O F E CTOR C OUNTY

, G REETINGS :

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, on March 28, 2017,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

In the interest of R.S. and J.S., children

11th Court of Appeals No. 11-16-00291-CV and

County Court at Law No. 2 Case No. CC2-3459-PC

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ 

### This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. "

WHEREFORE WE COMMAND YOU To observe the order of our said Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

W ITNESS

, the H ON

. J IM R. W RIGHT

, Chief

Justice of our said Court, with the seal

thereof annexed at the City of Eastland,

on June 7, 2017.

S HERRY W ILLIAMSON

, C LERK

By: Myrna McGough, Deputy
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4612



# 
L EWIS G ENE B ENNETT , J R .,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-61) Submitted: December 4, 2001 Decided: December 26, 2001 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Lewis Gene Bennett, Jr. appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to one count of passing and uttering counterfeitcurrency and one count of possession of counterfeit currency in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472 (West 2000). He was sentenced to one year and one day in prison and three years of supervised release on each count, to run concurrently, and $440 in restitution. Bennett argues the district court erred when it applied U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B5.1(b)(2) (2000) to enhance his sentence. Section 2B5.1(b)(2) provides for an offense level enhancement for a defendant who manufactured or produced counterfeit currency or possessed devices or materials used to counterfeit currency. Thisguideline, however, "does not apply to persons who merely photocopy notes or otherwise produce items that are so obviously counterfeit that they are unlikely to be accepted even if subjected to only minimal scrutiny." USSG § 2B5.1(b)(2), comment. (n.4); see United States v. Miller , 77 F.3d 71, 76 (4th Cir. 1996). We review the district court’s legal determinations de novo and findings of fact for clear error. United States v. Williams , 253 F.3d 789, 791-92 (4th Cir. 2001). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm Bennett’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ENNETT
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.869 Columbia River. ( a ) The draws of the Interstate 5 Bridges, mile 106.5, between Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, shall open on signal except that the draws need not be opened for the passage of vessels from 6:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 2:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday except federal holidays.
( b ) The draw of the Port of Hood River bridge, mile 169.8 at Hood River, shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
( c ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge, mile 201.2, between Celilo, Oregon, and Wishram, Washington, is automated and is normally maintained in the fully open-to-navigation position. ( 1 ) *Lights.* All lights required for automated operation shall be visible to marine traffic for a distance of at least 2 miles and shall be displayed at all times, day and night. ( i ) When the draw is fully open, a steady green light shall be displayed at the center of the drawspan on both upstream and downstream sides.
( ii ) When the draw is not fully open, a steady red light shall be displayed at the center of the drawspan on both upstream and downstream sides.
( iii ) When the draw is about to close, flashing yellow lights in the form of a down-pointing arrow shall be displayed at the center of the drawspan on both upstream and downstream sides.
( 2 ) *Operation.* When a train approaches the bridge, the yellow lights shall start flashing. After an 8-minute delay, the green lights shall change to red, the drawspan shall lower and lock, and the yellow lights shall be extinguished. Red lights shall continue to be displayed until the train has crossed and the drawspan is again in the fully open position. At that time, the red lights shall change to green.
( 3 ) Vessels equipped with radiotelephones may contact Burlington Northern Santa Fe to obtain information on the status of the bridge. Bridge status information also may be obtained by calling the commercial telephone number posted at the drawspan of the bridge.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CCGD13 85-02, 50 FR 31591, Aug. 5, 1985; CGD13-93-031, 60 FR 32268, June 21, 1995; CGD13-99-011, 65 FR 1544, Jan. 11, 2000]
§ 790.16 “In reliance on.” ( a ) In addition to acting (or omitting to act) in good faith and in conformity with an administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, interpretation, enforcement policy or practice, the employer must also prove that he actually relied upon it.[101]
( b ) Assume, for example, that an employer failed to pay his employees in accordance with the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. After an employee suit has been brought against him, another employer calls his attention to a letter that had been written by the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, in which the opinion was expressed that employees of the type employed by the defendant were exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The defendant had no previous knowledge of this letter. In the pending employee suit, the court may decide that the opinion of the Administrator was erroneous and that the plaintiffs should have been paid in accordance with the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Since the employer had no knowledge of the administrator's interpretation at the time of his violations, his failure to comply with the overtime provisions could not have been “in reliance on” that interpretation; consequently, he has no defense under section 9 or section 10 of the Portal Act.
Footnotes -
790.16
[101] In a colloquy between Senators Thye and Cooper (93 Cong. Rec. 4451), Senator Cooper pointed out that the purpose of section 9 was to provide a defense for an employer who pleads and proves, among other things, that his failure to bring himself under the Act “grew out of reliance upon” the ruling of an agency. See also statement of Representative Keating, 93 Cong. Rec. 1512; colloquy between Representatives Keating and Devitt, 93 Cong. Rec. 1515; cf. colloquy between Senators Donnell and Ball, 93 Cong. Rec. 4372.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual  Report of Stereo Vision  Entertainment,
Inc.  on Form  10-KSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John
Honour,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     John Honour
------------------------------
John Honour
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)



October 30, 2006

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.320 What advisories are given to tankers? A manned deepwater port's person in charge of vessel operations must advise the master of each tanker underway in the safety zone or area to be avoided of the following: ( a ) At intervals not exceeding 10 minutes, the vessel's position by range and bearing from the pumping platform complex; and
( b ) The position and the estimated course and speed, if moving, of all other vessels that may interfere with the movement of the tanker within the safety zone or area to be avoided.