50252 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Notices 

1Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert did not 

participate. 

2A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

3The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by the Committee For Fairly Traded 

Japanese Cement; the International Brotherhood of 

Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, 

Forgers and Helpers; the United Steel, Paper & 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied 

Industrial and Service Workers International Union; 

the International Union of Operating Engineers; and 

Local Lodge 93, International Association of 

Machinists and Aerospace Workers to be 

individually adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

Comments: Before submitting an ICR 

to OMB, PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) 

requires each agency to ‘‘* * * provide 

60-day notice in the Federal Register 

* * * and otherwise consult with 

members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information * * *.’’ 

Agencies must specifically solicit 

comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the agency to perform its 

duties, including whether the 

information is useful; (b) evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (c) enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

minimize the burden on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

To comply with the public 

consultation process, we published a 

notice in the Federal Register on March 

25, 2011 (76 FR 16816), announcing that 

we would submit this ICR to OMB for 

approval. The notice provided the 

required 60-day comment period. We 

received no comments in response to 

the notice. 

If you wish to comment in response 

to this notice, you may send your 

comments to the offices listed under the 

ADDRESSES section of this notice. The 

OMB has up to 60 days to approve or 

disapprove the information collection 

but may respond after 30 days. 

Therefore, to ensure maximum 

consideration, OMB should receive 

public comments by September 12, 

2011. 

Public Comment Policy: We post all 

comments, including names and 

addresses of respondents, at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Before including 

your address, phone number, e-mail 

address, or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, be 

advised that your entire comment— 

including your personal identifying 

information—may be made publicly 

available at any time. While you can ask 

us in your comment to withhold your 

personal identifying information from 

public view, we cannot guarantee that 

we will be able to do so. 

ONRR Information Collection 

Clearance Officer: Hyla Hurst (303) 231– 

3495. 

Dated: August 2, 2011. 

Gregory J. Gould, 

Director for Office of Natural Resources 

Revenue. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20510 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–461 (Third 

Review)] 

Gray Portland Cement and Cement 

Clinker From Japan; Scheduling of an 

Expedited Five-Year Review 

Concerning the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Gray Portland Cement and 

Cement Clinker From Japan 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of an expedited 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

§ 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on gray portland cement and 

cement clinker from Japan would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

this review and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: August 5, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On August 5, 2011, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (76 

FR 24519, May 2, 2011) of the subject 

five-year review was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate.1 The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting a full review.2 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct an expedited review 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the review will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on 

September 12, 2011, and made available 

to persons on the Administrative 

Protective Order service list for this 

review. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the review and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,3 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before October 

3, 2011 and may not contain new factual 

information. Any person that is neither 

a party to the five-year review nor an 

interested party may submit a brief 

written statement (which shall not 

contain any new factual information) 

pertinent to the review by October 3, 

2011. However, should the Department 

of Commerce extend the time limit for 

its completion of the final results of its 

review, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Notices 50253 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II(C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the review must be 

served on all other parties to the review 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the review period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

§ 1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 9, 2011. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20544 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–797] 

Certain Portable Electronic Devices 

and Related Software; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation; Institution 

of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1337 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on July 

8, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, on behalf of Apple Inc., f/k/a 

Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, 

California. A supplement was filed on 

August 3, 2011. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain portable electronic devices and 

related software by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,844,915 (‘‘the ‘915 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381 (‘‘the ‘381 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,084,859 (‘‘the 

‘859 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,920,129 

(‘‘the ‘129 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

6,956,564 (‘‘the ‘564 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplement, except for any confidential 

information contained therein, are 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. 

Hearing impaired individuals are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2011). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

August 5, 2011, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain portable 

electronic devices and related software 

that infringe one or more of claims 1– 

5, 7–12, 14–19, and 21 of the ‘915 

patent; claims 1–20 of the ‘381 patent; 

claims 14–20, 25, and 28 of the ‘859 

patent; claims 1–3, 5–12, 14–19, 21, 22, 

and 24–28 of the ‘129 patent; and claims 

28 and 36 of the ‘564 patent, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Apple Inc., f/k/a Apple Computer, Inc., 

1 Infinite Loop, 

Cupertino, CA 95014. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

HTC Corp., 

23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan 330, 

Taiwan. 

HTC America, Inc., 

13920 SE. Eastgate Way, Suite 400, 

Bellevue, WA 98005. 

Exedea, Inc., 

5950 Corporate Drive, 

Houston, TX 77036. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Acting Chief Administrative Law 

Judge Charles E. Bullock, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES