alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50215-50216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20509]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: August 8, 2011.
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             FDIC Ref. No.                      Bank name                   City             State   Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10386.................................  Bank of Shorewood.......  Shorewood...............       IL     8/5/2011
10387.................................  Bank of Whitman.........  Colfax..................       WA     8/5/2011
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 50216]]

[FR Doc. 2011-20509 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**1996-  oil_crops_outlook_12.13.96oil_crops_outlook_11.13.96oil_crops_outlook_10.15.96oil_crops_outlook_09.12.96oil_crops_outlook_08.13.96oil_crops_outlook_07.15.96oil_crops_outlook_06.13.96oil_crops_outlook_05.13.96oil_crops_outlook_04.12.96oil_crops_outlook_03.13.96oil_crops_outlook_02.12.96oil_crops_outlook_01.17.96

**
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

36 CFR Part 1280

RIN 3095-AA06


Public Use of NARA Facilities; Correction

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NARA published in the Federal Register of June 1, 2000 a final 
rule revising its regulations for use of its facilities. Inadvertently, 
we omitted a qualification that NARA employees may use the NARA shuttle 
between the National Archives Building and the College Park facility 
for official purposes only. This document provides the correct text.

DATES: Effective on July 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Morton at (301) 713-7360, 
extension 253.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NARA published a final rule document in the 
Federal Register of June 1, 2000, (65 FR 34977) revising 36 CFR part 
1280, Public Use of NARA Facilities. Section 1280.14 provides the 
conditions under which NARA employees, other Government employees, and 
the public may use the NARA shuttle. NARA has had a long-standing 
policy that NARA employees may use the shuttle only for official 
purposes, but this limitation was omitted from the final rule. This 
correction provides that text.
    In the document FR 00-13810 published on June 1, 2000, (65 FR 
34977) make the following correction:


Sec. 1280.14  [Corrected]

    1. On page 34979, in the second column, in Sec. 1280.14, correct 
the fifth line of that section to read ``intended for NARA employees' 
use for official purposes. Other''.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
Nancy Y. Allard,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-14117 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
#### § 780.104 How modern specialization affects the scope of agriculture.

The effect of modern specialization on agriculture has been discussed by the U.S. Supreme Court as follows:

Whether a particular type of activity is agricultural depends, in large measure, upon the way in which that activity is organized in a particular society. The determination cannot be made in the abstract. In less advanced societies the agricultural function includes many types of activity which, in others, are not agricultural. The fashioning of tools, the provision of fertilizer, the processing of the product, to mention only a few examples, are functions which, in some societies, are performed on the farm by farmers as part of their normal agricultural routine. Economic progress, however, is characterized by a progressive division of labor and separation of function. Tools are made by a tool manufacturer, who specializes in that kind of work and supplies them to the farmer. The compost heap is replaced by factory produced fertilizers. Power is derived from electricity and gasoline rather than supplied by the farmer's mules. Wheat is ground at the mill. In this way functions which are necessary to the total economic process of supplying an agricultural produce become, in the process of economic development and specialization, separate and independent productive functions operated in conjunction with the agricultural function but no longer a part of it. Thus the question as to whether a particular type of activity is agricultural is not determined by the necessity of the activity to agriculture nor by the physical similarity of the activity to that done by farmers in other situations. The question is whether the activity in the particular case is carried on as part of the agricultural function or is separately organized as an independent productive activity. The farmhand who cares for the farmer's mules or prepares his fertilizer is engaged in agriculture. But the maintenance man in a powerplant and the packer in a fertilizer factory are not employed in agriculture, even if their activity is necessary to farmers and replaces work previously done by farmers. The production of power and the manufacture of fertilizer are independent productive functions, not agriculture (see *Farmers Reservoir Co.* v. *McComb,* 337 U.S. 755 cf. *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254).
#### Renee Meyer, Appellant, v Stephen Meyer, Respondent.

Submitted July 29, 1996;

decided October 22, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that (1) affirmed Supreme Court’s order of February 15, 1994, except insofar as it affirmed the granting of appellant’s motion to resettle the amended judgment, and (2) affirmed that portion of Supreme Court’s order of May 11, 1995, denying appellant’s motion to hold respondent in contempt, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order of May 11, 1995, as directed arbitration, dismissed upon the ground that as to that part of the order, appellant is not a party aggrieved; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
### G02 S. ain Street ,Joplin. l\IO G4801 417-G2:3-02G2 ,'·· Fax417-625-171/l 

# REGIONAL AIRPORT E-mail: :o;stoekam(a<joplimno.org November5, 2012 Dennis J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE, 81h Floor Washington, D.C. 20590 Reference DOT-OST-2006-23932 Dear Dennis, The City ofJoplin, Missouri is pleased to provide in this letter its comments on the pending Essential Air Service RFP regarding our local air service. The lasttwo years have been exceptional forJoplin air service. American Eagle replaced Great Lakes as our local airline in February of 2011. In 2010, the lastfull year of Great Lakes service, we generated about 7,800 O&D passengers. In the first full 12 months ofAmerican Eagle service (March 2011 to February 2012) we generated over 53,000 O&D passengers, an increase ofabout 600%! We are very pleased with American Eagle service and are working with that carrierto improve that service. We are gratified that Eagle is proposing forthis bid cycle a dramatic reduction in subsidy need from $2,778,756 per yearto only $342,559 per year. Based on those numbers Joplin is well on its way to attaining its goal ofsupporting subsidy free air service. We appreciate the efforts the Department has made to support us as the airservice landscape around us changed during the past decade. Wewholeheartedly endorse the proposal ofAmerican Airlines to provide American Eagle service at Joplin for the next two year EAS cycle. We acceptAmerican's proviso that 50-seat regional jet equipmenttypes may vary and that eitherAmerican Eagle or SkyWest (operating as American Eagle) may operate Joplin's AA coded flights. We do hope the carrierwill ensure we receive as many 50-seat flights as possible in orderto accommodate our growing traffic demand. We do note that the carrier's bid document specifies the 50-seat ERJ-145. As was the case forthe first two year EAS cycle with American, Joplin waives the right to hold-in American Eagle (after 120 day notice oftermination) should the carrierwish to exit the market. We are confidentthatwill not occur and lookforward to a continued long and successful relationship with American. Best regards,

Steve Stockam Airport Manager 

# -
**Falls Prevention Program Information Cover Sheet**
OMB Control No. 0985-0039

Exp. Date 01/31/2018

***Instructions to the Leaders/Coaches/Instructors*: Please use this as a cover sheet for the completed data collection forms to return to the Survey Coordinator at the end of the program.**

1.   Site Name: City:  State: 

2.   If this is a new program delivery/ implementation site, please also complete 2a and 2b:

a.   Street Address: ____________________________________________Zip code:___________

b.   Type of site (select the type that best describes your site):

3.  Name of parent/host/sponsoring organization licensed to offer program:  _ 	

4.  Leader/Coach/Instructor Names (Please provide your first and last names and provide the daytime phone number or email of the best person to contact about any questions on the forms.)

Name: _ Phone Email:_ Name:_Phone :_Email:__

5.   Program Start Date (mm/dd/yyyy):  End Date (mm/dd/yyyy):  

6.   Did you offer a “Session 0/Introductory Session” with this workshop? (a Session 0/Introductory Session is an optional pre-workshop session provided by some agencies?       Yes       No
□	□

7.   Name of Program offered (Mark only one.) [Note to Grantee: adapt this to fit local programming]

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0985-0039. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: Administration for Community Living, 330 C Street SW, Washington DC 20201,  Attention: PRA Reports Clearance Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001075445
<NAME>                        DIVERSIFIED PRODUCT INSPECTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         62,909
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  95,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               654,554
<PP&E>                                         150,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (52,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 654,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          747,641
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,116
<OTHER-SE>                                     (159,595)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   654,554
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               753,235
<CGS>                                          1,178,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,178,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,266)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (434,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (434,713)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
§ 118.100 Retroreflective panels on bridge piers. The District Commander may require or authorize the display of high intensity red or green retroreflective panels when the District Commander finds it necessary: ( a ) To better identify a hazardous pier.
( b ) To provide a backup for red pier lights, red channel margin lights, and green mid channel lights, which are subject to vandalism or otherwise difficult to properly maintain. If the District Commander determines that the nominal nighttime visibility required is less than one-half mile, the panels must be at least six inches square. If the visibility required is more than one-half mile, the panels must be at least 12 inches square.
( c ) To mark bridge piers or channel sides on bridges not required to have bridge lighting. Lateral significant red triangles and green square retroreflective panels shall be used. The panels shall be at least 36 square inches in area to provide a nominal nighttime visibility distance of at least one-half mile.
[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16313, May 2, 1986]
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and 

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any 

formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

District of Columbia

Court of Appeals

No. 17-BG-1083

IN RE LAURENCE F. JOHNSON

2017 DDN 239

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No. 934398

BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior 

Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED – December 21, 2017)

On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals 

indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of 

Maryland by consent with a right to seek reinstatement after ninety days; this 

court’s October 10, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent and directing 

him to show cause why functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be 

imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal 

discipline; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court’s 

show cause order but did timely file the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit, 

it is 

ORDERED that Laurence F. Johnson is hereby suspended from the practice 

of law in the District of Columbia for ninety days, nunc pro tunc to October 10, 

2017, with reinstatement subject to a fitness requirement. See In re Sibley, 990 

A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical 

discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); In re 

Cole, 809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed 

reciprocal matters the “imposition of identical discipline should be close to 

automatic”). This discipline is concurrent with the discipline imposed by this court 

in In re Johnson, 158 A.3d 913 (D.C. 2017).

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.331 What are the requirements for hybrid personal flotation devices? ( a ) The operator must ensure that the use and stowage of all commercial hybrid personal flotation devices (PFDs) used as work vests comply with the procedures required for them in 46 CFR 160.077-29, and all limitations, if any, marked on them.
( b ) All commercial hybrid PFDs on the deepwater port must be of the same or similar design and must have the same method of operation.
#### § 780.800 Scope and significance of interpretative bulletin.

Subpart A of this part 780 and this subpart I constitute the official interpretative bulletin of the Department of Labor with respect to the meaning and application of section 13(b)(15) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended. This section provides an exemption from the overtime pay provisions of the Act for two industries (a) for employees engaged in ginning of cotton for market in any place of employment located in a county where cotton is grown in commercial quantities and (b) for employees engaged in the processing of sugar beets, sugar-beet molasses, sugarcane or maple sap, into sugar (other than refined sugar) or syrup. The limited overtime exemptions provided for cotton ginning and for sugar processing under sections 7(c) and 7(d) (see part 526 of this chapter) are not discussed in this subpart.
```

[House Report 107-8]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                      107-8

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

   March 6, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 78]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 78, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides that the following bills and 
resolutions may be considered under suspension of the rules at 
any time on the legislative day of Wednesday, March 7, 2001:
    (1) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 31) expressing 
the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of organ, 
tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and supporting National 
Donor Day;
    (2) The bill (H.R. 624) to amend the Public Health Service 
Act to promote organ donation; and
    (3) The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 47) honoring 
the 21 members of the National Guard who were killed in the 
crash of a National Guard aircraft on March 3, 2001, in south-
central Georgia.

                                  

```
1 

Basic Tips on Web Design for an 

Older Adult Audience

If you’re a service provider, you should have a website that is accessible to the 

population you’re serving. Some older adults may have specific online accessibility 

needs that are easy to address – in fact, many of these suggestions enhance 

readability for all users. Here are some tips and best practices that don’t require an 

advanced web design background:

• Use larger font size and clear, easy-to-read fonts. Your website text should 

be at least 14-point. Some examples of fonts you might use include Arial, 

Calibri, Verdana, and Tahoma.

• Ensure that your website has clear color contrast between the text and the 

background of the page.

• Keep your website streamlined and focused. Using too many cluttered design 

elements will just make your site confusing.

• Break down your information into shorter paragraphs and bullet points.

• Caption your videos and/or provide transcripts.

• Provide image descriptions and captions; when you’re adding images, you 

should also add “alt text” so that visitors with low vision using screen readers 

can still get the image’s context.

• Use a different color and underlining for links to other pages within the text of 

the website to ensure they are obvious. Do not underline anything that is not a 

link.

• Make buttons and other linked items large enough to click on.

• Make sure your site is mobile-friendly. Many people will use tablets or phones 

to access your site.
2

Links for further reading:

• Level Access, “Ensuring Web Accessibility for Older Adults”

• National Institute on Aging, “Making Your Website Senior Friendly”

• U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), Section508.gov

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for 

Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. 

Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express 

freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily 

represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services 

Programs. For more information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.