35990 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 6, 2000 / Notices

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

25.562, 25.785(b), 25.785(h)(2),

25.785(j), 25.183(e), and 25.853(d).

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit an executive interior to be

installed for ‘‘private, not-for-hire’’ use

on a Boeing Model 777–200 airplane.

Docket No.: 30052.

Petitioner: Airbus Industrie.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

21.183(f), 25.2(b), 25.807(f)(4), and

121.310(m).

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit a distance between exit door

pairs 2 and 3 in excess of 60 feet for the

A340–600 airplane.

[FR Doc. 00–14157 Filed 6–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–2000–21]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I),

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections.

The purpose of this notice is to improve

the public’s awareness of, and

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s

regulatory activities. Neither publication

of this notice nor the inclusion or

omission of information in the summary

is intended to affect the legal status of

any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received

must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received

on or before June 27, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any

application in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC–

200), Petition Docket No. lll, 800

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591.

Comments may also be sent

electronically to the following internet

address: 9–NPRM–cmts@faa.gov.

The petition, any comments received,

and a copy of any final disposition are

filed in the assigned regulatory docket

and are available for examination in the

Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G,

FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A),

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone

(202) 267–3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cherie Jack (202) 267–7271, Forest

Rawls (202) 267–8033, or Vanessa

Wilkins (202) 267–8029 Office of

Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

This notice is published pursuant to

paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 11).

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2000.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

Docket No.: 29974.

Petitioner: Mr. Joseph E. Fisher.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.574 and 135.91.

Description of Relief Sought: To

permit the operator of an aircraft on

which Mr. Fisher is traveling to allow

Mr. Fisher to furnish, carry, and operate

onboard its aircraft certain oxygen

storage, generating, and dispensing

equipment for Mr. Fisher’s medical use

while being carried as a passenger.

Docket No.: 30023.

Petitioner: Lufthansa Technik.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

25.562, 25.785(b), 25.785(h)(2),

25.785(j), 25.813(e), and 25.853(d).

Description of Relief Sought: To allow

an executive interior to be installed for

‘‘private, not-for-hire’’ use on a Boeing

Model 777–200 airplane.

Dispositions of Petitions

Docket No.: 29459.

Petitioner: Laurel Oaks Career

Development Campus.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

65.17(a), 65.19(b), and 65.75(a) and (b).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Laurel Oaks CDC

to (1) administer the FAA oral and

practical mechanic tests to students at

times and places identified in Laurel

Oaks CDC’s FAA-approved AMT

Policies, Procedures, and Curriculum

handbook; (2) Conduct oral and

practical mechanic tests as an integral

part of the education process rather than

upon students’ successful completion of

the mechanic written tests; (3) Approve

students for retesting within 30 days

after failure without requiring a signed

statement certifying that additional

instruction has been given in the failed

area; and (4) Administer the FAA AMG

written knowledge test to students

immediately following successful

completion of the general curriculum,

before meeting the experience

requirements of § 65.77. Partial Grant,

03/10/2000, Exemption No. 7154.

Docket No.: 29505.

Petitioner: Rough & Ready Guide

Service, Inc. dba Nordic Flying Service.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

43.3(a) and (g), and paragraph (c) of

appendix A to part 43.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit pilots employed

by NFS to perform the preventative

maintenance functions listed in

paragraph (c) of appendix A to part 43

on an aircraft operated under 14 CFR

part 135 without those pilots holding a

mechanic certificate. Denial, 02/25/

2000, Exemption No. 7129.

Docket No.: 29943.

Petitioner: Duncan Aviation, Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

145.45(f).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Duncan Aviation

to place copies of its Inspection

Procedures Manual (IPM) in strategic

locations in its repair stations rather

than giving a copy of its IPM to each of

its supervisory and inspection

personnel. Grant, 03/21/2000,

Exemption No. 7159.

Docket No.: 27122.

Petitioner: Air Tractor, Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.31(a)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Air Tractor and

pilots of Air Tractor AT–802 and AT–

802A airplanes to operate those

airplanes without holding a type rating,

although the maximum gross weight of

the airplanes exceeds 12,500 pounds.

Grant, 03/21/2000, Exemption No.

5651F.

Docket No.: 23290.

Petitioner: Air Transport Association

of America.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.311(f) and 121.391(d).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit ATA member

airlines and other similarly situated

certificate holders operating under part

121 to continue to locate required flight

attendants at the mid-cabin flight

attendant station during takeoff and

landing on Boeing 767 airplanes. Grant,

03/29/2000, Exemption No. 4298H.

Docket No.: 29732.

Petitioner: IHC Health Services, Inc.

dba IHC Life Flight.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

133.45(e)(1).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit IHC to conduct

Class D rotorcraft-load combination

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 6, 2000 / Notices 35991

rescue operations with an A109K–2

helicopter certificated in the normal

category under 4 CFR part 27, subject to

certain conditions and limitations.

Grant, 02/07/2000, Exemption No. 7118.

Docket No.: 29949.

Petitioner: Air Transport

International, L.L.C.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.310(d)(4).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit ATI to operate its

DC–8 airplanes in passenger-carrying

operations without a cockpit control

device for each emergency light, subject

to certain conditions and limitations.

Grant, 03/29/2000, Exemption No. 7156.

Docket No.: 28945.

Petitioner: Air Transport

International, L.L.C.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.433(c)(1)(iii), 121.441(a)(1),

121.441(b)(1), and appendix F to part

121.

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit ATI to continue

to combine recurrent flight and ground

training and proficiency checks for

ATI’s flight crewmembers into a single

annual training and proficiency

evaluation program. Grant, 02/11/2000,

Exemption No. 6728A.

Docket No.: 29916.

Petitioner: Rhodes Aviation, Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit RAI to operate

certain aircraft under part 135 without

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder

installed in the aircraft. Grant, 03/17/

2000, Exemption No. 7151.

Docket No.: 29901.

Petitioner: Segrave Aviation, Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Segrave Aviation

to operate certain aircraft under part 135

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 03/17/2000, Exemption No. 7150.

Docket No.: 29847.

Petitioner: Midwest Aviation Services,

Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit MASI to operate

certain aircraft under part 135 without

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder

installed in the aircraft. Grant, 03/17/

2000, Exemption No. 7149.

Docket No.: 29917.

Petitioner: Helicopters, Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit HCI to operate

certain aircraft under part 135 without

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder

installed in the aircraft. Grant, 03/14/

2000, Exemption No. 7148.

Docket No.: 28159.

Petitioner: Grand Canyon Airlines,

Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.345(c)(2) and 135.143(c)(2).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit GCA to continue

to operate certain aircraft under part 121

or part 135 without a TSO–C112 (Mode

S) transponder installed in the aircraft.

Grant, 03/30/2000, Exemption No.

6101B.

Docket No.: 25336.

Petitioner: United Airlines, Inc.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.697(a)(3), (b), (c), and (d), and

121.709(b)(3).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit United to

continue to use computerized signatures

to satisfy the airworthiness release

signature requirements of part 121 in

lieu of physical signatures. Grant, 03/

31/2000, Exemption No. 5121F.

Docket No.: 19634.

Petitioner: Boeing Commercial

Airplanes Group.

Section of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.310(d)(4).

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit operators of

McDonnell Douglas DC–8 aircraft to

continue to operate those aircraft in

passenger-carrying operations without a

cockpit control device for each

emergency light. Denial, 04/03/2000,

Exemption No. 3055K.

[FR Doc. 00–14158 Filed 6–5–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M0

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Use the Revenue From a Passenger

Facility Charge (PFC) at Kalamazoo/

Battle Creek International Airport,

Kalamazoo, Michigan

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Rule on

Application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to use the revenue from a

PFC at Kalamazoo/Battle Creek

International Airport under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L.

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before July 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Federal Aviation

Administration, Detroit Airports District

Office, Willow Run Airport, East, 8820

Beck Road Belleville, Michigan 48111.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. Kenneth

Potts, Airport Director of the

Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International

Airport at the following address:

Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International

Airport, 5235 Portage Road, Kalamazoo,

Michigan 49002.

Air carriers and foreign air carriers

may submit copies of written comments

previously provided to the Kalamazoo/

Battle Creek International Airport under

section 158.23 of Part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Gary J. Migut, Program Manager, Federal

Aviation Administration, Detroit

Airports District Office, Willow Run

Airport, East, 8820 Beck Road,

Belleville, Michigan 48111 (734–487–

7278). The application may be reviewed

in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to use the

revenue from a PFC at Kalamazoo/Battle

Creek International Airport under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

On May 11, 2000, the FAA

determined that the application to use

the revenue from a PFC submitted by

Kalamazoo/Battle Creek International

Airport was substantially complete

within the requirements of section

158.25 of Part 158. The FAA will

approve or disapprove the application,

in whole or in part, no later than July

29, 2000.

The following is a brief overview of

the application.

PFC Application No.: 00–02–U–OO–

AZO.

Level of the PFC: $3.00.

Actual charge effective date: April 1,

1997.

Estimated charge expiration date:

December 1, 2001.

Total approved net PFC revenue:

$3,276,183.00.

Brief description of proposed projects:

Rehabilitate Taxiway B (South), Glycol