alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50499-50500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20610]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that one meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate):
    Literature (application review): September 14-16, 2011 in Room 716. 
This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on September 14th and 15th, and 
from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on September 16th, will be closed.
    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of 
February 15, 2011, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact the Office of AccessAbility, National 
Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days 
prior to the meeting.

[[Page 50500]]

    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or 
call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: August 8, 2011.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2011-20610 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Exhibit 10.12



Main Street Trust, Inc.
Summary of Director Compensation


Current compensation for directors of Main Street is set forth below.  Directors
of Main Street who are also employees are not separately compensated for service
on the Boards or committees.

Non-employee  directors  of Main  Street are granted  options to purchase  5,000
shares of common  stock for serving on the Board of  Directors  of Main  Street.
These  options vest ratably  over a one year period.  In addition,  non-employee
directors receive the following cash compensation:

  Attendance fee for each bank board meeting attended                     $  500

  Annual attendance fee for service on the FirsTech Board                 $1,250
  Annual attendance fee for service on the Audit Committee                $1,000
  Annual attendance fee for service on Compensation and
    Nominating Committees combined                                        $  500
  Annual attendance fee for service on Senior Loan Committee              $5,000
  Annual attendance fee for service on the Trust Administration
    Committee                                                             $1,250



                                       1
[Crim. No. 835.

Department Two.

January 17, 1902.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM DAY, Appellant.

Criminal Law—Felony—Appeal—Absence op Argument—Error not Appearing—Affirmance.—Upon appeal /from a judgment of conviction of a felony and from an order denying a new trial, where the transcript consists merely of the judgment-roll and notice of appeal, without any statement or bill of exceptions, and shows that the appellant had the aid of competent counsel upon the trial, but no brief has been filed in his behalf upon the appeal, if no error is apparent upon the face of the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. F. B. Ogden, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A. L. Frick, and H. S. Aldrich, for Appellant.

Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The defendant was charged by the information with having committed the infamous crime against nature, was tried by a jury and found guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment at San Quentin for the term of ten years, and he now appeals from said judgment and an order denying a new trial.

The transcript consists of the judgment-roll and notice of appeal, without any statement or bill of exceptions. Upon the trial he had the aid of competent counsel, but no brief has *361been filed in his behalf. The information was not objected to, and appears to be sufficient, nor do we discover any errors in the instructions given to the jury or in the proceedings.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.-
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 24, 2004 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of San
Rafael Bancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

|/s/VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLPVavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

Rancho Cucamonga, California
March 29, 2004

---

QuickLinks
Grafton

No. 6512

#### Katherine Hodgdon v. William E. Gallagher

April 30, 1973

*Edes & Elliott*for the plaintiff filed no brief.

*New Hampshire Legal Assistance, George C. Bruno*and *C. Murray Sawyer,*by brief for the defendant.

*186Grimes, J.

The only issue involved in this case is whether an indigent defendant in a civil case is entitled to have the county pay the cost of a transcript of the trial which he claims is necessary for him to appeal the verdict against him. We hold that he is not so entitled.

After a trial by the court in an action for personal injuries arising out of an accident involving a pedestrian and an automobile operated by the defendant, an $8,000 verdict was rendered against the defendant. The defendant moved that the court order a transcript of the proceedings for use in his appeal be paid for by the county because he was without funds. The question of law raised by defendant’s exception to the denial of this motion was transferred by *Perkins,*J.

In his brief, the defendant represents that the transcript will cost about $200.00. He filed an affidavit stating that his only asset is a parcel of land assessed at $900 and that he was unemployed and without income.

This being a civil case in which the State is not involved as prosecutor, the rationale of *Griffin v. Illinois,*351 U.S. 12, 100 L. Ed. 891, 76 S. Ct. 585 (1956), and related cases does not apply. Nor does *Boddie v. Connecticut,*401 U.S. 371, 28 L. Ed. 2d 113, 91 S. Ct. 780 (1971), which excused an indigent from paying a filing fee in a divorce case, aid the defendant since one’s interest in a civil tort action does not rise to the same constitutional level as one’s inability to dissolve a marriage except through the courts. *United States v. Kras,*409 U.S. 434, 34 L. Ed. 2d 626, 93 S. Ct. 631 (1973); *Ortwein v. Schwab,*410 U.S. 656, 35 L. Ed. 2d 572, 93 S. Ct. 1172 (1973).

In view of our holding, we have not considered whether the county would be a necessary party if our ruling were otherwise.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection  Act  of  2002  (18  U.S.C.ss.1350,  as  adopted),  Matthew  Harriton
President,  Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Nesco Industries,  Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended April 30,
2004, and to which this  Certification  is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Periodic
Report") fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The  information  contained in the Periodic  Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  of the Company at the end of the
period  covered by the Periodic  Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.


                                     By: /s/ Matthew Harriton
                                     Matthew Harriton, President
                                    (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Dated: September 15, 2004
Nutrition Services Incentive Program (OANS) for the States/Territories

FY 2023 Final Cash Allocation

8/30/2023

State/Territory

Nutrition Services 

Incentive Program

Alabama $3,196,215

Alaska $475,853

Arizona $1,894,861

Arkansas $2,349,964

California $13,237,797

Colorado $1,427,297

Connecticut $1,380,724

Delaware $504,603

District of Columbia $855,168

Florida $6,274,833

Georgia $3,034,002

Hawaii $493,352

Idaho $799,789

Illinois $7,328,019

Indiana $1,232,073

Iowa $1,384,970

Kansas $2,023,006

Kentucky $1,484,454

Louisiana $3,738,204

Maine $620,450

Maryland $1,634,138

Massachusetts $5,532,454

Michigan $7,785,369

Minnesota $1,732,646

Mississippi $1,478,127

Missouri $3,818,163

Montana $879,344

Nebraska $1,023,511

Nevada $1,573,957

New Hampshire $1,198,743

New Jersey $3,446,488

New Mexico $2,251,743

New York $16,151,067

North Carolina $3,352,372

North Dakota $798,910

Ohio $5,671,974

Oklahoma $1,777,539

Oregon $1,736,300

Pennsylvania $6,591,457

Rhode Island $415,289

South Carolina $1,758,951

South Dakota $944,402

Tennessee $1,684,913

Texas $10,853,506

Utah $1,306,333

Vermont $773,110

Virginia $1,900,042

Washington $2,324,663

West Virginia $1,527,134

Wisconsin $2,706,158

Wyoming $881,776

American Samoa $84,218

Guam $387,691

Northern Mariana Islands $68,085

Puerto Rico $2,688,076

Virgin Islands $105,761

TOTAL $152,580,044
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Tron International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald R. Remick, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



Date:  November 10, 2003                               /s/Ronald R. Remick
                                                       -------------------
                                                       Ronald R. Remick
                                                       Senior Vice President and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAMON CAMPA SOVERANES

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 307

- C R

Appeal from the

195 th District Court

of Dallas C ounty, Texas

(TC# F

- 1452686

- N )

O R D E R

Pendi ng before the Court is State ’s request to supplement the reporter’s record and to

extend the time for filing its brief

. T he motion is GRANTED.

There fore , the Court ORDERS the Official Court R eporter for the 195 th District Court of

Dallas County, Texas to submit a supplemental r eporter ’ s record containing a copy of State ’ s

Exhibit 1. The supplemental reporter’s record is due with this Court on or before July 1, 2016.

In the event that State’s Exhibit 1 has been lost or destroyed, the court reporter is directed to

notify the Court immediately. Further, the State’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is

granted until June 17, 2016. The State also requests that the appeal be abated, but the Court has

determined that abatement is unnecessary at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 th day of May , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ

.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Epic Bancorp for the yearended December 31, 2004, I, Michael Moulton, Chief Financial Officer ofEpic Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:

(1)   such AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB of Epic Bancorp for the year ended December 31,2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in such AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB of Epic Bancorp for the year ended December 31,2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Epic Bancorp.
| Dated: March 30, 2005  | /s/** **Michael  Moulton |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                        | MICHAEL MOULTON               |
|                        |  Chief Financial Officer |
|                        | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
ACL Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2016 Annual Allocation

2/2/2016

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy for 

Assistive 

Technology (PAAT)

Alabama $53,530

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $74,306

Arkansas $50,000

California $428,326

Colorado $59,121

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $219,594

Georgia $111,460

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $142,183

Indiana $72,820

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $50,000

Louisiana $51,326

Maine $50,000

Maryland $65,971

Massachusetts $74,460

Michigan $109,391

Minnesota $60,239

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $66,933

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $98,665

New Mexico $50,000

New York $217,970

North Carolina $109,767

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $127,983

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,000

Pennsylvania $141,153

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $53,344

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $72,296

Texas $297,567

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $91,910

Washington $77,949

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $63,555

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $30,000

Guam $30,000

Northern Mariana Islands $30,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $30,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $30,000

TOTAL $4,441,819
Passport Potash Inc.: Exhibit 10.5 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO MINERAL PROPERTY OPTION AGREEMENT

DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 

THIS AGREEMENT is dated for reference as of the
1st day of October, 2010 

BETWEEN: 

SOUTHWEST EXPLORATION INC., an
Arizona 
corporation having an address at 19935 E Sonoqui
Blvd., Queen
Creek, Arizona, 85242 

(the “Optionor”) 

OF THE FIRST PART 

AND: 

PASSPORT POTASH INC., a company
duly 
incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Province 
of Quebec and
having an address at 608 – 1199 
West Pender Street, Vancouver, British
Columbia, V6E 2R1 

(the “Optionee”) 

OF THE SECOND PART 

WHEREAS: 

(A)                      The
parties hereto entered into a mineral property option agreement made as of the
30th day of September, 2008, as amended September 18, 2009 (the “Mineral
Property Agreement”) on the terms and conditions more particularly set forth
therein; and 

(B)                      The
parties have agreed to amend certain scheduled payments and share issuances.


NOW THEREFORE THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in
consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties
do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 

1.                        
Sections 4.1(b)(iii) and (iv) of the Mineral Property Agreement are deleted and
inserted as follows: 

		“4.1 	(b) 	(iii) 	
      on or before November 1, 2010 issue 5,000,000 shares of
      the Optionee to the Optionor; and 

	 	  	  	  	
       

				(iv) 	
      within six months from the date of the TSX Venture
      Exchange approval of the issuance of the 5,000,000 shares in Item
      4.1(b)(iii) pay the Optionor US$350,000 in cash;” 



2.                        
In all other respects the Mineral Property Agreement is hereby confirmed. 




- - 2 - - 

3.                       
This Amendment Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts or by
facsimile, each of which shall together, for all purposes, constitute one and
the same instrument, binding on the parties, and each of which shall together be
deemed to be an original, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not
signatory to the same counterpart or facsimile. 

4.                       
This Agreement is subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed
this agreement as of the day and year first above written. 

	THE COMMON SEAL of SOUTHWEST 	) 	  
	MINERAL EXPLORATION was hereto 	) 	  
	affixed in the presence of: 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	  	) 	c/s 
	Per: ___/s/ Floyd R. Bleak________________ 	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	Per: ________________________________	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	THE COMMON SEAL of PASSPORT 	) 	  
	POTASH INC. was hereto affixed in the 	) 	  
	presence of: 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	  	) 	c/s 
	Per: ___/s/ Laara Shaffer_________________ 	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	Per: ___/s/ Stephen B. Butrenchuk_________ 	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	)
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

it24£)ll-E-175 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:10 AM Sheet 215 of 264 
P.2 

08/10/98 MON 07:39 FAX 360 696 0055 GLV LaValley. 11002 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

A 945 2 j 

II--E.-/75 * 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

August 3,1998 

Ms. Sandy Bracldns 

GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (360)696-2588 

Fax Number; (360) 696-0055 

OCT" 2'2-1983 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Contact Summary: 

This contact report will supplement (not supersede) the information contained in the January 

20,1998 coniaet report on file for GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. 

Ms. S:andy Brackins was contacted on behalf of the U.S. EPA to update information provided 

in the 1993 EPA Reinforced Plastic Composites Screemng Survey submitted by GL&V LaValley 

Industries, Inc. for their facility located in Vancouver, Washington. In response to my questions Ms. 

Brackins indicated the following: 

The company does not add filler of any type to the vinyl ester resins used :in the fabrication 

of its corrosion resistant product line. The company does not add filler of any type to the polyester 

resin used in the fabrication of its non-corrosion resistant product line. Reinforcement is not 

considered filler in the context of the above sentence. 

The facility uses atomized spray lay-up to apply a black tooling gel coat which contains 

approximately 42.0% HAP by weight (42.0% styrene, 0.0% methyl methacrylate:). No additional 

HAP is added to the gel coat in the fabrication process with the exception of small .amounts of HAP 

that may (or may not) be present in initiators, promoters and/or catalysts added to the gel coat. 

All of the resin and gel coat used by the facility is mixed in the 55 gallon drums the resin and 

gel coat were: originally supplied in. This mixing is conducted for the purpose of adding in the 

various promoters supplied with the resins and gel coats. The mixing is accompluihed by inserting 

a mixing shaft through the bung hole located on the top of the SS gallon drum. The opening where 

the mixing sliaft penetrates the bung hole is not sealed. There is a small (1/4 to 3/8 inch) gap 

between the mixing shaft and the bung hole. The facility does not use active (forced) ventilation 

during any of its mixing operations (i.e. the facility does not apply a vacuum to the SS gallon drum 

during mixinjr). 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE •AfiAidj^fa 

08/07/98 FRI 14:03 [TX/RX NO 7118] ©002 
IfiOOl 

0«/10/»» MON 07:39 FAX 360 696 0055 

GLV LaValleyLAVALLEY 

i*j2£L 

Attn: 'fiphuit ^TrU^O 

From: 

Number of pages transmitted:. O Q Occluding this cover sheets) 

Message: 

Fax Transmittal 

Date: •Slipktf 

^&JQW& " 

J_________^_4 JLCL 

Best Regards, 

GL&V LaValley Industries, Inc. 7600 NE 47th Avenue, Vancouver, WA 98661 

phone (360) 696-2588. fax (360) 696-0055 iirl'axmitrl 

2^
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Industrial Experience of Women Workers at the Summer Schools, 1928 to 1930

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Palmer, Gladys L. (Gladys Louise). 						*The Industrial Experience of Women Workers at the Summer Schools, 1928 to 1930 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 89*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5397,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER