alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7660

RONNIE EWINGS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, USP Hazelton,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-00153-IMK-JSK)

Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linn Richard Walker, Assistant Federal Public Defender, 

Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Jarod James Douglas, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM: 

Ronnie Ewings, a District of Columbia Code offender, 

seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief on his 28 

U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Ewings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
4

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.408 What are the maintenance requirements for fire extinguishers? ( a ) Portable and semi-portable extinguishers must be inspected and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10 (incorporated by reference, see § 149.3).
( b ) Certification or licensing by a state or local jurisdiction as a fire extinguisher servicing agency will be accepted by the Coast Guard as meeting the personnel certification requirements of NFPA 10 for annual maintenance and recharging of extinguishers.
( c ) Monthly inspections required by NFPA 10 may be conducted by the owner, operator, person-in-charge, or a designated member of the crew.
( d ) Non-rechargeable or non-refillable extinguishers must be inspected and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10; however, the annual maintenance need not be conducted by a certified person and can be conducted by the owner, operator, person-in-charge, or a designated member of the crew.
( e ) The owner or managing operator must provide satisfactory evidence of the required servicing to the marine inspector. If any of the equipment or records has not been properly maintained, a qualified servicing facility must perform the required inspections, maintenance procedures, and hydrostatic pressure tests. A tag issued by a qualified servicing organization, and attached to each extinguisher, may be accepted as evidence that the necessary maintenance procedures have been conducted.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48244, July 22, 2016]
AIDD Developmental Disabilities Councils (DDC) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2015 Annual Allocation

2/19/2015

State/Territory

AIDD 

Developmental 

Disabilities 

Councils (DDC)

Alabama $1,267,110

Alaska $472,622

Arizona $1,377,490

Arkansas $752,586

California $6,459,004

Colorado $850,026

Connecticut $673,989

Delaware $472,622

District of Columbia $472,622

Florida $3,461,007

Georgia $2,019,042

Hawaii $472,622

Idaho $472,622

Illinois $2,590,984

Indiana $1,469,351

Iowa $764,194

Kansas $606,663

Kentucky $1,182,615

Louisiana $1,357,983

Maine $472,622

Maryland $995,159

Massachusetts $1,305,975

Michigan $2,437,488

Minnesota $1,012,073

Mississippi $902,449

Missouri $1,336,501

Montana $472,622

Nebraska $472,622

Nevada $472,622

New Hampshire $472,622

New Jersey $1,533,290

New Mexico $483,919

New York $4,062,646

North Carolina $1,976,156

North Dakota $472,622

Ohio $2,810,012

Oklahoma $885,680

Oregon $773,163

Pennsylvania $2,987,494

Rhode Island $472,622

South Carolina $1,082,855

South Dakota $472,622

Tennessee $1,442,550

Texas $4,742,116

Utah $630,623

Vermont $472,622

Virginia $1,482,561

Washington $1,170,066

West Virginia $732,246

Wisconsin $1,276,488

Wyoming $472,622

American Samoa $246,128

Guam $246,128

Northern Mariana Islands $246,128

Puerto Rico $2,474,604

Virgin Islands $246,128

TOTAL $71,442,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            98,613
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  98,631
<CASH>                                           8,514
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,486
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 90,706
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             12,083
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  2,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,486
<PREMIUMS>                                       3,605
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,418
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  52
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      91
<BENEFITS>                                       3,564
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    329
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       299
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Richard Coglon,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp., and Robert Knight,
Chief Financial Officer of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp., each hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    
          the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. for the
          quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

(2)    
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Oil and
          Gas Corp.

Dated: August 12, 2004

/s/ Richard CoglonRichard
CoglonPresident
and Chief Executive Officer, Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.

/s/ Robert KnightRobert
KnightChief Financial Officer,Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland Oil and
Gas Corp. and will be retained by Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.334 Who must ensure compliance with the requirements for unmanned deepwater ports?

The owner or operator of an unmanned deepwater port must ensure that applicable requirements are complied with on that deepwater port.
EXHIBIT 10.53







                                December 14, 2001



David Firestone
Brighton Opportunity Fund, LP
1801 Century Park East, Ste. 1235
Los Angeles, CA 90067



RE: BRIGHTON LOAN- TERM SHEET



Dear David,

The  following  letter  will  confirm the terms of the loan to be made by you to
Vertical  Computer  Systems,  Inc.  ("Vertical"),  and the stock  pledges by the
Mountain Reservoir Corporation ("MRC") and Luiz Valdetaro ("Valdetaro"). You and
we hereby confirm the following terms:

      1.   You shall loan Vertical  $425,000 in cash upon  execution of all loan
           documents.

      2.   Vertical  shall pay a commitment  fee of $125,000 to certain  parties
           approved by you and  Vertical.  This amount will be net-funded by you
           to the appropriate individuals.

      3.   Pursuant to the terms of the Promissory Note, dated December 11, 2001
           (the  "Note"),  Vertical  shall pay you $425,000 plus interest in the
           amount of 12% per annum,  due on January 31,  2001.  On December  31,
           2001 a payment of accrued interest will be due.

      4.   Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Pledge Agreement  executed by MRC,
           MRC will pledge 36,303,932 shares of Vertical Common stock subject to
           Rule 144 in the event of any default on the loan.

5.            Pursuant to the terms of the Stock  Pledge  Agreement  executed by
              Valdetaro,  Valdetaro  will pledge  15,000,000  shares of Vertical
              Common  stock that are not subject to Rule 144 in the event of any
              default on the loan.


<PAGE>




      6.   The Company under no  circumstances  will cancel the stock being held
           as  Collateral  unless  required  to  do  so by a  state  or  federal
           regulatory body.

      7.   In the event of a default on the Promissory  Note where (a) the stock
           is sold pursuant to the Stock Pledge  Agreements by MRC and Valdetaro
           and (b) the proceeds of these sales of stock are is  insufficient  to
           cover the  principle and any interest then owed pursuant to the Note,
           Vertical  acknowledges and agrees that it will be liable for any then
           outstanding amounts.

If the foregoing  meets with your  approval,  please sign in the space  provided
below.


                                   Sincerely,



                                   ---------------------------
                                   Richard Wade, President
                                   Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.


                                   ---------------------------
                                   Frank Mento, President
                                   Mountain Reservoir Corp. ("Pledgor")



                                   ---------------------------
                                   Luiz Valdetaro ("Pledgor")

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


---------------------------
David Firestone, General Partner
Brighton Opportunity Fund, LP
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   April      14, 2010 | By:    | /s/      David Braun                     |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |  David      Braun                   |
|                                       |   |  Chief      Financial Officer       |
|                                       |   |  (Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS (LOSS) OF
THE LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLORATION COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                                      10,300
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              143,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                 38,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           206,600
<PP&E>                                                   3,120,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,913,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,467,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      200,600
<BONDS>                                                    691,600
<COMMON>                                                     5,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 365,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,467,700
<SALES>                                                    822,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           830,500
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              718,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            45,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          38,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             28,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                                10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         18,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                18,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.56
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.140 What communications equipment must be on a deepwater port? ( a ) Each deepwater port must have the following communications equipment: ( 1 ) A system for continuous two-way voice communication among the deepwater port, the tankers, the support vessels, and other vessels operating at the deepwater port. The system must be usable and effective in all phases of a transfer and in all conditions of weather at the deepwater port;
( 2 ) A means to indicate the need to use the communication system required by this section, even if the means is the communication system itself; and
( 3 ) Equipment that, for each portable means of communication used to meet the requirements of this section, is: ( i ) Certified under 46 CFR 111.105-11 to be operated in Group D, Class 1, Division 1 Atmosphere; and,
( ii ) Permanently marked with the certification required in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. As an alternative to this marking requirement, a document certifying that the portable radio devices in use are in compliance with this section may be kept at the deepwater port.
( b ) The communication system of the tank ship mooring at an unmanned deepwater port will be deemed the primary means of communicating with support vessels, shore side, etc.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 443 

Designating February 2008 as ‘‘Go Direct Month.’’ 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2008 

Mrs. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating February 2008 as ‘‘Go Direct Month.’’ 

Whereas, in fiscal year 2007, nearly 60,000 checks issued by 

the Department of the Treasury, worth approximately 

$56,000,000, were endorsed by forgery; 

Whereas the Department of the Treasury receives approximately 1,400,000 inquiries each year regarding problems 

with paper checks; 

Whereas, each month, nearly 12,000,000 social security and 

other Federal benefit payments are made with checks; 

Whereas the United States would generate approximately 

$132,000,000 in annual savings if all Federal benefit 

checks were paid by direct deposit; 

Whereas the use of direct deposit is a more secure, reliable, 

and cost-effective method of payment than paper checks 

because the use of direct deposit— 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

SRES 443 ATS 

(1) helps protect against identity theft and fraud; 

(2) provides easier access to funds during emergencies and natural disasters; and 

(3) provides the people of the United States with 

more control over their money; 

Whereas the Department of the Treasury and the Federal 

Reserve Banks have launched Go Direct, a national campaign to motivate people who receive Federal benefit payments to use direct deposit to receive those payments; 

Whereas Go Direct works with more than 1,100 partners 

across the Nation, including financial institutions, advocacy groups, and community organizations; 

Whereas more than 130 financial institutions representing 

25,000 branches nationwide participated in the 2007 ‘‘Go 

Direct Champions’’ competition to encourage the use of 

direct deposit among people who receive Federal benefit 

payments; and 

Whereas more than 1,600,000 people in the United States 

have switched from paper checks to direct deposit to receive Federal benefit payments since Go Direct launched 

in the fall of 2004: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates February 2008 as ‘‘Go Direct 

3 Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of the Go Di5 rect campaign; 

6 (3) commends Federal, State, and local govern7 ments, nonprofit agencies, and the private sector for 

8 promoting February as Go Direct Month; and 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

SRES 443 ATS 

1 (4) encourages people in the United States who 

2 are eligible to receive social security or other Federal 

3 benefit payments to— 

4 (A) participate in events and awareness 

5 initiatives held during the month of February 

6 with respect to using direct deposit; 

7 (B) become informed about the conven8 ience and safety of direct deposit; and 

9 (C) consider signing up for direct deposit 

10 of social security or other Federal benefit pay11 ments. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Guaranteed Growth

0% FY 2020

Run Date: 3/18/2020

Description: COVID-19 C1, C2 Supp.

Part B, 

Supportive 

Services

Part C1, 

Congregate 

Meals

Part C2, 

Home 

Meals

Part D, 

Preventive 

Services

Part E, 

Caregivers Total Title III

Total Amount $80,000,000 $160,000,000 $240,000,000

HH Percentage (%)

Allotment Amount $80,000,000 $160,000,000 $240,000,000

Alabama $1,207,451 $2,414,902 $3,622,353

Alaska $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Arizona * $1,785,557 $3,571,113 $5,356,670

Arkansas $736,040 $1,472,081 $2,208,121

California $8,362,127 $16,724,254 $25,086,381

Colorado $1,214,084 $2,428,167 $3,642,251

Connecticut $904,020 $1,808,040 $2,712,060

Delaware $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Dist. of Columbia $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Florida $6,053,894 $12,107,788 $18,161,682

Georgia $2,175,808 $4,351,615 $6,527,423

Hawaii $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Idaho $405,404 $810,808 $1,216,212

Illinois $2,942,080 $5,884,160 $8,826,240

Indiana $1,557,609 $3,115,217 $4,672,826

Iowa $783,831 $1,567,661 $2,351,492

Kansas $678,946 $1,357,891 $2,036,837

Kentucky $1,075,482 $2,150,964 $3,226,446

Louisiana $1,067,339 $2,134,677 $3,202,016

Maine $401,507 $803,015 $1,204,522

Maryland $1,382,776 $2,765,552 $4,148,328

Massachusettes $1,671,903 $3,343,807 $5,015,710

Michigan $2,533,623 $5,067,245 $7,600,868

Minnesota $1,317,165 $2,634,330 $3,951,495

Mississippi $697,599 $1,395,199 $2,092,798

Missouri $1,511,044 $3,022,089 $4,533,133

Montana $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Nebraska $444,037 $888,074 $1,332,111

Nevada $694,216 $1,388,432 $2,082,648

New Hampshire $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

New Jersey $2,120,289 $4,240,578 $6,360,867

New Mexico * $518,613 $1,037,227 $1,555,840

New York $4,691,073 $9,382,146 $14,073,219

North Carolina $2,463,141 $4,926,281 $7,389,422

North Dakota $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Ohio $2,936,406 $5,872,812 $8,809,218

Oklahoma $904,560 $1,809,120 $2,713,680

Oregon $1,068,162 $2,136,324 $3,204,486

Pennslyvania $3,398,687 $6,797,375 $10,196,062

Rhode Island $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

South Carolina $1,300,437 $2,600,874 $3,901,311

South Dakota $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Tennessee $1,622,922 $3,245,843 $4,868,765

Texas $5,401,932 $10,803,864 $16,205,796

Utah * $520,081 $1,040,163 $1,560,244

Vermont $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

Virginia $1,939,103 $3,878,207 $5,817,310

Washington $1,722,124 $3,444,248 $5,166,372

West Virginia $517,124 $1,034,248 $1,551,372

Wisconsin $1,455,244 $2,910,489 $4,365,733

Wyoming $400,000 $800,000 $1,200,000

American Samoa $50,000 $100,000 $150,000

Guam $200,000 $400,000 $600,000

Nothern Marianas $50,000 $100,000 $150,000

Puerto Rico $916,560 $1,833,120 $2,749,680

Virgin Islands $200,000 $400,000 $600,000

TOTAL $0 $80,000,000 $160,000,000 $0 $0 $240,000,000

* Note: Funds distributions include transferring 1.83% from New Mexico and 0.4% from Utah to Arizona

States+DC+PR 0 79,500,000 159,000,000 0 0 238,500,000

4 Territories 0 500,000 1,000,000 0 0 1,500,000

AoA TITLE III Older Americans Act