alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10_1.htm






  





  











  








 



2ND ADDENDUM OF AMENDMENT


DATED AS OF 19TH JUNE 2012







to Loan Agreement Dated as of October 5, 2010








	
By and between:

	
HOMI Industries Ltd, an Israeli company, #512805193, of 1 Aba Even Street, Merkazim Bldg. A, Herzliya Pituach 46725, Israel; duly represented by its Directors Mr D. Cohen and Mr J. Ronnel (“HOMI”);







 



	
And:

	
TOMWOOD LIMITED, a BVI company with a registered office at Vanterpool Plaza, 2nd floor, Wickhams Cay I, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands, and whose correspondence address for the purposes of this Agreement shall be at 8, rue Eynard, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland, represented by Isaac Elbaz, email: ielbaz@bluewin.ch (“Lender”)







 


 



	
RECITALS:

	
(A)

	
Further to the loan agreement between the Parties, dated as of October 5, 2010 (the “Agreement”), as amended pursuant to the 1st Addendum of Amendment dated September 12, 2011, pursuant to which Lender loaned USD 2,000,000 (two million US Dollars) to HOMI (the “Loan”), Lender gave written notice to HOMI, dated June 5, 2012, of its offer, valid until June 21, 2012, to convert the entire Loan into shares of the common stock of Hotel Outsource Management International, Inc. (“HOMI Inc.”), subject to the price per share in such conversion being $0.0181 (the “Offer”).







 



	
  

	
(B)

	
HOMI approved the Offer, and, in respect of conversion of the Loan into shares of HOMI Inc.’s common stock, it referred the matter to HOMI Inc., which approved the Offer by means of resolution of its Board of Directors.







 


All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings attributed thereto in the Agreement.


 



	
1.  

	
Conversion







 


It is hereby agreed that new Section 5.2A is added to the Agreement, as follows:


 



	
“5.2A

	
For a full conversion of the entire Loan, occurring during June or July 2012, the conversion will be a price per share of $0.0181, such that, in the event of such conversion, the entire Loan will be converted into 110,497,238 shares of HOMI Inc.’s common stock.”







 



	
2.  

	
No Other Amendment







 


For avoidance of any doubt, any provision of the Agreement not amended herein shall continue in full force and effect, such that the Agreement remains in full force and effect, in accordance with its terms, as amended pursuant to the 1st Addendum of Amendment and this 2nd Addendum of Amendment.


 


In witness whereof the Parties have executed this 2nd addendum of Amendment:


 



	
_______________________________


HOMI Industries Ltd

	  	
________________________________


TOMWOOD LIMITED












We, Hotel Outsource Management International, Inc., confirm and agree to abide by the provisions of Section 1 of this Addendum of Amendment above.












__________________________________________


Hotel Outsource Management International, Inc.
##### 



Exhibit 10.1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT This Amendment No. 1 to Severance Agreement, dated as of the 2nd day of February,
2005 (this Amendment), is entered into by and between Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Company) and [Name], [Title] of the Company (Executive). Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Severance Agreement (defined below). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Company and Executive previously entered into that Severance Agreement on March 1,
2004 (the Severance Agreement) providing for certain protections in the event of a Change of
Control of the Company. WHEREAS, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Pub. Law No. 108-357, 118 Stat. 1418) was
signed into law on October 22, 2004 (the AJCA); Section 885 of the AJCA creates new Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code the (Code) which provides rules related to nonqualified deferred
compensation. WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of the Severance
Agreement to comply with the newly enacted Section 409A of the Code. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and intending to be legally bound hereby,
the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Amendment of Section 3(c). Section 3(c) is replaced in its entirety by the
following: (c) Payment of Accrued But Unpaid Amounts. Within two (2)
business days after a Change of Control or such other timeframe as
required under applicable law, rule or regulation, the Company shall
pay the Executive (i) any unpaid portion of compensation previously
earned by the Executive; and (ii) all compensation previously
deferred by the Executive but not yet paid. Section 2. No Effect on Consistent Terms. All terms of the Severance Agreement not
inconsistent with this Amendment shall remain in place and in full force and effect and shall be
unaffected by this Amendment. Section 3. Governing Law. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, CONSTRUED AND
INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND ENFORCEABLE UNDER, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTS MADE IN TEXAS WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE-OF-LAW PRINCIPLES OF TEXAS. 1




---



##### 



Section 4. Headings. The section headings contained in this Amendment are for
reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
Amendment. [The Rest of This Page Left Blank Intentionally.] 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first
above written. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.By:Name:
    
    Jeffrey A. RichTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVE[Name]
1

Brown, Kelly

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 6:04 PM

To: Sasser, Erika

Cc: Wesson, Karen; Scavo, Kimber; Hemby, James; Mathias, Scott; Brown, Kelly; Elman, Barry; 

Cooperstein, Sharon

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 --Ozone NAAQs NPRM and 

RIA

Attachments: SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO12866_13563_O3-NAAQS-RIN2060-AP38-NPRPreamble_20141006 11-21-14.docx; SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO12866_

13563_Compare Ch 7 Engineering Cost Analysis.docx; 

SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO12866_13563_Compare Ch 10 Employment.docx; 

SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO12866_13563_O3 NAAQS RIA chapter5

_RLSO.docx; SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO12866_13563

_OzoneNAAQsRIA_miscellaneousdocx.docx

Attached please find a summary of interagency comments on both the Ozone NAAQs NPRM and RIA. Thanks and please 

let me know if you have any questions. 

Nathan
# General Meal Requirements for New York State

· Each complete meal meets or exceeds one-third the recommended daily allowance for adults 60 years of age or older. 

· It includes a good source of vitamin C (30mg) and vitamin A (300 mcg) and at least 3oz of high biological value edible protein. 

· Meals provide 3 oz protein, 1⁄2 cup vegetable, 1⁄2 cup starchy vegetable or fruit, 1 serving bread, dessert, 8 oz dairy.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Mark Pauline, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>District Attorney Orange County (Andrew R. Kass and Frank R. Moy of counsel), for appellant.Orange County Legal Aid Society, for respondent. (no brief filed)</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Justice Court of the Village of Goshen, Orange County (Rory K. Brady, J.), dated July 15, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument is denied.</p><p>In this prosecution for multiple counts of criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 215.50 [3]) and non-support of a child in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 260.05 [2]), the People appeal from an order granting defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2016/2016_26256.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Moody</i> (53 Misc 3d 31</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2016]), the order is reversed and defendant's motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument is denied.</p><p>Iannacci, J.P., Tolbert and Brands, JJ, concur.</p><br>Decision Date: May 23, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
§ 801.66 Consent findings and order. ( a ) *General.* At any time after the commencement of a proceeding under this part, but prior to the reception of evidence in any such proceeding, a party may move to defer the receipt of any evidence for a reasonable time to permit negotiation of an agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of the whole or any part of the proceeding. The allowance of such deferment and the duration thereof shall be at the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge, after consideration of the nature of the proceeding, the requirements of the public interest, the representations of the parties, and the probability of an agreement being reached which will result in a just disposition of the issues involved.
( b ) *Content.* Any agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of a proceeding or any part thereof shall also provide: ( 1 ) That the order shall have the same force and effect as an order made after full hearing;
( 2 ) That the entire record on which any order may be based shall consist solely of the notice of administrative determination (or amended notice, if one is filed), and the agreement;
( 3 ) A waiver of any further procedural steps before the Administrative Law Judge; and
( 4 ) A waiver of any right to challenge or contest the validity of the findings and order entered into, in accordance with the agreement.
( c ) *Submission.* On or before the expiration of the time granted for negotiations, the parties or their authorized representatives or their counsel may: ( 1 ) Submit the proposed agreement for consideration by the Administrative Law Judge; or
( 2 ) Inform the Administrative Law Judge that agreement cannot be reached.
( d ) *Disposition.* In the event an agreement containing consent findings and an order is submitted within the time allowed therefor, the Administrative Law Judge, within thirty (30) days thereafter, shall, if satisfied with its form and substance, accept such agreement by issuing a decision based upon the agreed findings.
CENTERS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING MAKE 

COMMUNITY LIVING POSSIBLE

WHAT IS COMMUNITY LIVING? 

People with disabilities and older 

adults have the same 

opportunities as everyone else to:

Choose for themselves where to live

Earn a living

Lead the lives they want

Make decisions about their lives

WHY COMMUNITY LIVING? 

People prefer it

It usually costs less

It’s a legal right

Everyone benefits when 

everyone can contribute

HOW DO INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAMS HELP?

Connecting 

to local 

services

Assisting 

with job 

searches

Teaching 

local transit 

skills

Helping with 

assistive 

technology

Educating 

about legal 

rights

Supporting 

peer 

mentoring

Moving 

from 

institutions

Helping 

with selfadvocacy 

School-tocareer 

transition

Supporting 

healthy 

living

Housing 

options 

assistance

Assisting with 

home 

accessibility

For more info, go to ACL.Gov or call us at (202) 401-4634. twitter.com/aclgov facebook.com/aclgov
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date August 19, 2005            By: /s/ Merritt Jesson
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                Name:  Merritt Jesson
                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. and
will be retained by Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       19
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 14, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President), 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                 

1. Sharon Lord Caskey, Georgetown, Texas, Roger Griffin Lord, Belton, Texas, and John Arthur Kirkpatrick, Leander, Texas; to acquire voting shares of First Texas Bancorp, Inc., Georgetown, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First Texas Bank, Lampasas, Texas; First Texas Bank, Round Rock, Texas; First Texas Bank, Killeen, Texas; First Texas Bank, Georgetown, Texas; and First Texas Bank, Belton, Texas. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 25, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-13603 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ArtemisInternational Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Stefanovich, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Robert S. Stefanovich |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Stefanovich     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |
|   | March 30, 2005            |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.4




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.




/s/ John Adamovich, Jr.Name:  John Adamovich, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerDate:  May 10, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Older Americans Month 2018 Materials
 OAM Materials
Join us in promoting celebrating older Americans in your community.
Logos
Posters
Badges
Button and Banner
Social Media
Sample Article: DOCX
Sample Proclamation: DOCX

                    *Last modified on 02/19/2019* Older Americans Month 2018 logo
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
§ 106.105 Applicability. ( a ) The requirements in this part apply to owners and operators of any fixed or floating facility, including MODUs not subject to part 104 of this subchapter, operating on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) of the United States for the purposes of engaging in the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural gas, or mineral resources that are regulated by 33 CFR subchapter N, that meet the following operating conditions: ( 1 ) Hosts more than 150 persons for 12 hours or more in each 24-hour period continuously for 30 days or more;
( 2 ) Produces greater than 100,000 barrels of oil per day; or
( 3 ) Produces greater than 200 million cubic feet of natural gas per day.
( b ) The TWIC requirements found in this part do not apply to mariners employed aboard vessels moored at U.S. OCS facilities only when they are working immediately adjacent to their vessels in the conduct of vessel activities.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003, as amended by USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 55048, Sept. 28, 2007]
#### § 779.203 Distinction between “enterprise,” “establishment,” and “employer.”

The coverage, exemption and other provisions of the Act depend, in part, on the scope of the terms *employer, establishment,* or *enterprise.* As explained more fully in part 776 of this chapter, these terms are not synonymous. The term *employer* has been defined in the Act since its inception and has a well established meaning. As defined in section 3(d), it includes, with certain stated exceptions, any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee. (See § 779.19.) The term *establishment* means a *distinct physical place of business* rather than *an entire business or enterprise.* (See § 779.23.) The term *enterprise* was not used in the Act prior to the 1961 amendments, but the careful definition and the legislative history of the 1961 and 1966 amendments provide guidance as to its meaning and application. As defined in the Act, the term *enterprise* is roughly descriptive of a business rather than of an establishment or of an employer although on occasion the three may coincide. The enterprise may consist of a single establishment (see § 779.204(a)) which may be operated by one or more employers; or it may be composed of a number of establishments which may be operated by one or more employers (see § 779.204(b)). The enterprise is not necessarily coextensive with the entire business activities of an employer; a single employer may operate more than one enterprise (see § 779.204(c)). The Act treats as separate enterprises different businesses which are unrelated to each other even if they are operated by the same employer.