alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21218]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 15, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Community First Financial Group, Inc., Chapel Hill, North 
Carolina; to become a bank holding company by acquiring Harrington 
Bank, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, proposed successor by charter 
conversion to Harrington Bank, FSB, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 16, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-21218 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 566 

Designating June 2008 as ‘‘National Aphasia Awareness Month’’ and 

supporting efforts to increase awareness of aphasia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2008 

Mr. JOHNSON submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 2008 as ‘‘National Aphasia Awareness 

Month’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness 

of aphasia. 

Whereas aphasia is a communication impairment caused by 

brain damage, typically resulting from a stroke; 

Whereas, while aphasia is most often the result of stroke or 

brain injury, it can also occur with other neurological disorders, such as in the case of a brain tumor; 

Whereas many people with aphasia also have weakness or paralysis in their right leg and right arm, usually due to 

damage to the left hemisphere of the brain, which controls language and movement on the right side of the 

body; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 566 ATS 

Whereas the effects of aphasia may include a loss or reduction in ability to speak, comprehend, read, and write, 

while intelligence remains intact; 

Whereas stroke is the 3rd leading cause of death in the 

United States, ranking behind heart disease and cancer; 

Whereas stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability in the United States; 

Whereas there are about 5,000,000 stroke survivors in the 

United States; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are about 750,000 strokes 

per year in the United States, with approximately 1⁄3 of 

these resulting in aphasia; 

Whereas aphasia affects at least 1,000,000 people in the 

United States; 

Whereas more than 200,000 Americans acquire the disorder 

each year; 

Whereas the National Aphasia Association is unique and provides communication strategies, support, and education 

for people with aphasia and their caregivers throughout 

the United States; and 

Whereas as an advocacy organization for people with aphasia 

and their caregivers, the National Aphasia Association 

envisions a world that recognizes this ‘‘silent’’ disability 

and provides opportunity and fulfillment for those affected by aphasia: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of, and en3 courages all Americans to observe, National Aphasia 

4 Awareness Month in June 2008; 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 566 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes that strokes, a primary cause of 

2 aphasia, are the third largest cause of death and dis3 ability in the United States; 

4 (3) acknowledges that aphasia deserves more 

5 attention and study in order to find new solutions 

6 for serving individuals experiencing aphasia and 

7 their caregivers; and 

8 (4) must make the voices of those with aphasia 

9 heard because they are often unable to communicate 

10 their condition to others. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 23(a)



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-3415, 33-33153, 33-53155, 33-53897, 33-55317, 33-58787, 333-36909, 333-49195, 333-36846,
333-75848, 333-100234, 333-105161, and 333-105162 on Form S-8 and No. 333-33814 on Form S-3 of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation of our report dated January 14, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the Corporations adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marshall &
Ilsley Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin     
|March 8, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.310 When is radar surveillance required? A manned deepwater port's person in charge of vessel operations must maintain radar surveillance of the safety zone or area to be avoided when: ( a ) A tanker is proceeding to the safety zone after submitting the report required in § 150.325 in this part;
( b ) A tanker or support vessel is underway in the safety zone or area to be avoided;
( c ) A vessel other than a tanker or support vessel is about to enter or is underway in the safety zone or area to be avoided; or
( d ) As described in the deepwater port security plan.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39182, July 1, 2013]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the second quarter of
fiscal year 2008 ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:
February 8, 2008
    
    /s/ Lynn R. BlodgettLynn R. Blodgett,President and Chief Executive Officer ofAffiliated Computer Services, Inc.
§ 142.30 Head protection. ( a ) Personnel in areas where there is a hazard of falling objects or of contact with electrical conductors shall wear a head protector meeting the specifications of ANSI Z89.1, for the hazard involved.
( b ) Each head protector must be marked with the information specified by ANSI Z89.1 for that type of protector and for the hazard involved.
#### § 126.37 Separability.

If any provision of the rules, regulations, conditions, or designations contained in this part or the application of such provision to any person, waterfront facility, or circumstances shall be held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the rules, regulations, conditions, or designations contained in this part and applicability of such provision to other persons, waterfront facilities, or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

[CGFR 51-37, 16 FR 8680, Aug. 28, 1951]
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Main Street Trust,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Van A.
Dukeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/  Van A. Dukeman
--------------------------------
Van A. Dukeman
Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2006
Exhibit 21.01
 MercadoLibre, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Parent company:
 MercadoLibre, Inc.
   Subsidiaries:
 MercadoLibre S.A. (Argentina)
  MercadoLibre S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
  MercadoLivre.Com Atividades de Internet Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoLibre Chile Ltda. (Chile)
  MercadoLibre Colombia, S.A. (Colombia)
  MercadoLibre Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)
  Ibazar.com
Atividades de Internet Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoLibre ZonaAmerica S.A. (Uruguay)
  MercadoLibre Ecuador S.A. (Ecuador)
  MercadoLibre Perú S.A. (Peru)
   Hammer.com, LLC
   MercadoPago, LLC
   ListaPop, LLC
   Deremate.com de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)




---



##### 



Deremate.com de Uruguay S.A. (Uruguay)
  Deremate.com de Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)
  Deremate.com de Venezuela S.A. (Colombian Branch) (Colombia)
  eBazar.com.br Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoPago.com
Representacőes Ltda. (Brazil)
  MercadoPago Colombia S.A. (Colombia)
  MercadoPago S.A. (Chile)
  Servicios Administrativos y Comerciales, LLC (Delaware)
  PSGAC Prestadora de Servicios Gerenciales, Administrativos y Comerciales, S.A. de C.V (Mexico)
  Classifieds LLC (Delaware)
    Venecapital Group Inc. (Panama)
  Grupo Veneclasificados C.A. (Venezuela)
  Clasificados Internacionales S.A. (Panama)
  Colclasificados S.A. (Colombia)
  Clasificados Florida LLC (Florida)
  DeRemate.com de Argentina S.A.
   DeRemate.com Chile S.A.
  Interactivos y Digitales México S.A. de C.V.
  Compañía de Negocios Interactiva de Colombia E.U.
EXHIBIT 10(ix)

DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



Agreement made on December 19, 2002 between International Portfolio Management Ltd. with offices located at 1300-1075 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3C9 referred to as Creditor and Sona Development Corp. with offices located at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.



SECTION ONE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATION



The parties acknowledge that Debtor is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $19,963.20 due to administrative services rendered in 2001.



SECTION TWO
AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT METHOD OF PAYMENT



Debtor and Creditor desire and agree, to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms an provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment for same contained in the original loan obligation as described in Section One above.



SECTION THREE
CONSIDERATION



In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:



|a. | Method of Payment:Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in Section One, above, 39,926 shares of Debtor's common stock, valued at $0.50 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of services provided by Creditor to Debtor.   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Creditor's board of directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 39,926 shares of Debtor's common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.



In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.



Sona Development Corp.



/s/ Nora CoccaroBy: Nora Coccaro, President



International Portfolio Management, Ltd.

/s/ Ross WilmotBy: Ross Wilmot, Executive Vice- President

- 28 -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 10.7**

 

**MVC CAPITAL, INC.**

**AMENDMENT TO THE CUSTODY AGREEMENT**

 

**THIS AMENDMENT**dated as of March 31, 2015, to the Custody Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2002, as amended February 10, 2006, May 1, 2006, June 14, 2006, April 6, 2009 and March 30, 2012 (the “Agreement”), is entered into by and between **MVC Capital, Inc.,**a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and **U.S. Bank, N.A.,**a national banking association (the “Custodian”).

 

**RECITALS**

 

**WHEREAS,** the parties have entered into an Agreement; and

 

**WHEREAS,** the Corporation and the Custodian desire to amend the length of the Agreement; and

 

**WHEREAS,** Article XIV, Section 14.4 of the Agreement allows for an amendment by a written instrument executed by both parties.

 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** the parties agree as follows:

 

Section 10.1, effective period of the Agreement, is hereby superseded and replaced with the following Section 10.1:

 

**10.1 Effective Period.** This Agreement shall be effective as of March 31, 2015 and shall continue in full force and effect for three (3) years until terminated as hereinafter provided.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer on one or more counterparts as of the date and year first written above.

 
| **MVC   CAPITAL, INC.** | ** **           | **U.S.   BANK, N.A.** |
|------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|
|                         |                 |                  |   |   |
| By:                          | /s/ Scott   Schuenke |                  | By: | /s/ Michael R.   McVoy |
|                         |                 |                  |   |   |   |
| Printed Name:                | Scott Schuenke       |                  | Printed Name:   Michael R. McVoy |
|                         |                 |                  |
| Title:                       | CFO                  |                  | Title: Senior   Vice President |

 

----
# Chart

Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 

Developmental Disabilities Councils - FY 2012 Program Performance Report

Performance Measure 2 - Systems Change 

# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.669 St. Louis River (Duluth-Superior Harbor). ( a ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Grassy Point railroad Bridge, mile 5.44, shall open on signal except that, from December 15 through March 15 the draw shall open if at least 12-hour notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Canadian National Combined Railroad and Highway Bridge, mile 13.91, need not be opened for the passage of vessels. The owner shall return the draw to operable condition within a reasonable time when notified by the District Commander to do so.
[USCG-2017-0212, 82 FR 33803, July 21, 2017]
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                       |                                                    |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                July 13, 2007 | By:                                                        |  By:                /s/                John G. Simmonds |
|                               | Name:                John G. Simmonds                           |
|                               | Title:                CEO, Director and                Chairman |
United Way of Tarrant County

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year sustainability 

grant are to:

• Significantly increase the number of older 

adults and older adults with disabilities at 

risk for falls who participate in evidencebased community programs to reduce 

falls and falls risks; and

• Implement innovative funding 

arrangements to support the proposed 

programs, while embedding the 

programs into an integrated, sustainable 

program network. 

United Way of Tarrant County (UWTC) and its 

partners will: 

• Reach older adults in rural, underserved

areas of Central TX;

• Develop an electronic calendar class 

scheduling system to be hosted by Texas 

Healthy at Home, the network hub; and

• Form partnerships between YMCAs and 

AAAs in five counties.

Proposed Interventions

• A Matter of Balance (AMOB)

• EnhanceFitness (EF)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, UWTC will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Ardent Spirit

• Heart of Texas Council of Governments

• Texas A&M Center for Population Health

and Aging/Texas Active for Life® Coalition

• Texas Healthy at Home

• YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth

• YMCA of Central Texas

Anticipated Results 

UWTC and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Engage 480 participants in AMOB and 

650 participants in EF;

• Achieve a completer rate of 80% for both 

AMOB and EF; and

• Receive contracts for 50% of proposals 

made to healthcare payors.
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2019, effective May 1, 2019

Contact:

Donald Smith

Vice President, Community Development Division

and Director, Area Agency on Aging at United 

Way of Tarrant County

Don.Smith@unitedwaytarrant.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
#### Peter Zehr v. George C. Miller.

Filed June 5, 1894.

No. 4762.

Review: Failure to File Motion for Rehearing. The rule is well established that this court will not review the j udgment and proceedings of a district court on a petition in error unless a motion for a new trial was made in the district court presenting the alleged errors for its consideration and determination.

Error from the district court of Furnas county. Tried below before Cochran, J.

*Dudgeon & Dudgeon,*for plaintiff in error.

*D. T. Welty, contra.*

Harrison, J.

On the 16th day of March, 1891, the defendant in error filed a petition in the district court of Furnas county and commenced an action against the plaintiff in error, Peter Zehr, a justice of the peace of Burton’s Bend precinct, in said county, the object and purpose of which was to obtain -a writ of *mandamus*to issue to plaintiff in error, commanding him to act in the approval of an appeal bond in a case which had been determined before him adversely to the de*792fendant in error. Plaintiff in error answered, issues were-joined, and a trial to the judge of the district court resulted in a finding in favor of the relator and an order for the issuance of the writ. To reverse such finding and judgment the respondent Zehr prosecutes a petition in error to this court. There are several assignments of error in the petition, but an examination of the bill of exceptions and record discloses that the plaintiff in error did not file any motion for a new trial in the district court, and, in accordance with the well established rule of this court, that where a party fails to move for a new trial in the court below, he cannot raise a question on error to this court. The errors,'if any committed, are not properly before this court and cannot be reviewed. (See *Seeley v. Smith,*29 Neb., 549; *Manning v. Cunningham,*21 Neb., 288; *Becker v. Simonds,*33 Neb., 680; *Fitzgerald v. Brandt,*36 Neb., 683; *Gray v. Disbrow,*36 Neb., 857; *Smith v. Spaulding,*34 Neb., 128; *Withnell v. City of Omaha,*37 Neb., 621.) The judgment of the district court must be

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

              DIVERSIFIED SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Entity Name                                            Jurisdiction
-----------                                            ------------
<S>                                                    <C>
Registrant:

Diversified Security Solutions, Inc.                   Delaware

Subsidiaries:

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.                          New Jersey

Viscom Products, Inc.                                  Delaware

HBE Communications, Inc.                               New Jersey

Henry Bros. Electronics, Inc.                          California

Corporate Security Integration, LLC                    Arizona

National Safe of California, Inc.                      California

HBE Central Management                                 New Jersey
</TABLE>