## 23699 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

agency’’ have the same meanings as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).

(g) Fiscal year. (1) The fiscal year for a NGEP that does not have a fiscal year shall be the calendar year.

(2) Any NGEP, insured depository institution, or affiliate that has a fiscal year may elect to have the calendar year be its fiscal year for purposes of this part.

(h) Insured depository institution. ‘‘Insured depository institution’’ has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).

(i) NGEP. ‘‘NGEP’’ means a nongovernmental entity or person.

(j) Nongovernmental entity or

person —(1) General. A ‘‘nongovernmental entity or person’’ is any partnership, association, trust, joint venture, joint stock company, corporation, limited liability corporation, company, firm, society, other organization, or individual.

(2) Exclusions. A nongovernmental entity or person does not include—

(i) The United States government, a state government, a unit of local government (including a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general-purpose subdivision of a state) or an Indian tribe or tribal organization established under Federal, state or Indian tribal law (including the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands), or a department, agency, or instrumentality of any such entity;

(ii) A federally-chartered public corporation that receives Federal funds appropriated specifically for that corporation;

(iii) An insured depository institution or affiliate of an insured depository institution; or

(iv) An officer, director, employee, or representative (acting in his or her capacity as an officer, director, employee, or representative) of an entity listed in paragraphs (j)(2)(i) through (iii)
of this section.

(k) Party. The term ‘‘party’’. The authority citation for part 405 continues to read as follows: with respect to a covered agreement means each NGEP and each insured depository institution
or affiliate that entered into the
agreement.

(l) Relevant supervisory agency. The ‘‘relevant supervisory agency’’ for a covered agreement means the appropriate Federal banking agency
for—

(1) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) that is a party to the covered agreement;

(2) Each insured depository institution (or subsidiary thereof) or CRA affiliate that makes payments or loans or provides services that are subject to the covered agreement; and

(3) Any company (other than an insured depository institution or subsidiary thereof) that is a party to the covered agreement.

(m) State savings association. ‘‘State savings association’’ has the same meaning as in section 3(b)(3) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(b)(3)).

(n) Term of agreement. An agreement
that does not have a fixed termination
date is considered to terminate on the last date on which any party to the agreement makes any payment or provides any loan or other resources under the agreement, unless the relevant supervisory agency for the agreement otherwise notifies each party in writing.

Dated at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2015.

By order of the Board of Directors.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015–09894 Filed 4–28–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6741–01–P**



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2014–1083; Directorate Identifier 2014–CE–036–AD; Amendment**  **39–18140; AD 2015–08–04]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**



### Airworthiness Directives; Various **Aircraft Equipped With Wing Lift Struts**

**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99–01–05 R1, which applied to certain aircraft equipped with wing lift struts. AD 99– 01–05 R1 required repetitively inspecting the wing lift struts for corrosion; repetitively inspecting the wing lift strut forks for cracks; replacing any corroded wing lift strut; replacing any cracked wing lift strut fork; and repetitively replacing the wing lift strut forks at a specified time for certain airplanes. This new AD retains all requirements of AD 99–01–05R1 and adds additional airplane models to the Applicability section. This AD was prompted by a report that additional Piper Aircraft, Inc. model airplanes should be added to the Applicability section. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

**DATES** 

### : This AD is effective June 3, 2015.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of February 8, 1999 (63 FR 72132, December 31, 1998).

**ADDRESSES** 

### : For service information identified in this AD, contact Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Services, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; telephone: (772) 567–4361; Internet: www.piper.com. Copies of the instructions to the F. Atlee Dodge supplemental type certificate (STC) and information about the Jensen Aircraft STCs may be obtained from F. Atlee Dodge, Aircraft Services, LLC., 6672 Wes Way, Anchorage, Alaska 99518–
0409, Internet: www.fadodge.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. It is also available
on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–

1083.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 1083; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,

DC 20590.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : For Piper Aircraft, Inc. airplanes, contact: Gregory ‘‘Keith’’ Noles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474–5551; fax: (404) 474–5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov.

For FS 2000 Corp, FS 2001 Corp, FS 2002 Corporation, and FS 2003 Corporation airplanes, contact: Jeff Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057; phone: (425) 917–6405; fax: (245) 917–6590;
email: jeff.morfitt@faa.gov.


## 23700 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

For LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA) airplanes, contact: S.M. Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4145; fax: (816) 329–4090; email: sarjapur.nagarajan@ faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### :

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 99–01–05 R1, Amendment 39–17688 (78 FR 73997, December 10, 2013; corrected 78 FR 79599, December 31, 2013), (‘‘AD 99– 01–05 R1’’). AD 99–01–05 R1 applied to certain aircraft equipped with wing lift struts. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2014 (79 FR 78729). The NPRM was prompted by a report that Piper Aircraft, Inc. (Piper) Models J–3, J3C–65 (Army L–4A), J3P, J4B, and J4F airplanes should be added to the Applicability
section. We were also informed of a serial number overlap between Piper
Model PA–18s listed in AD 99–01–05 R1 and Piper Model PA–19 (Army L– 18C). Certain serial numbers listed for
Model PA–18s should also be listed under Model PA–19 (Army L–18C). The NPRM proposed to retain all requirements of AD 99–01–05 R1 and add airplanes to the Applicability section. We are issuing this AD to
correct the unsafe condition on these products.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 78729, December 31, 2014) and the FAA’s response to each comment.

Request To Remove the ‘‘NO STEP’’ Placard Requirement for Models PA– 25, PA–24–235, and PA–25–260 Airplanes

Joe Barr stated that LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA) Models PA–25, PA–24–235, and PA–25–260 airplanes should be exempt from the requirement in paragraph (m) of the proposed AD to install a ‘‘NO STEP’’ placard on each wing lift strut.

Joe Barr stated that the LAVIASA PA– 25 series airplanes are the only low wing monoplane aircraft of all the affected airplane models listed in the proposed AD. The LAVIASA PA–25 series airplanes have a wing support strut that is located on top of, rather than below, the wing. The upper end of the wing lift strut attaches to the top of the fuselage and the bottom end of the strut attaches to the top of the wing at the midpoint region. There is no safe wing walk surface area on the top of the wing that extends more than a few inches from the wing root to walk or stand at this mid-wing station. No one could possibly step on or stand on the strut at or near this wing location without significant damage to the adjacent fabric covered wing structure itself. Therefore, it is illogical and irrelevant to have a ‘‘NO STEP’’ placard of any kind at the mentioned location on the wing lift struts of the LAVIASA PA–25 series airplanes. This requirement was clearly meant for high wing aircraft only.

We agree with the commenter. The intent of the placard is to prevent damage from stepping on the lower end
of the strut. This would not occur on LAVIASA Models PA–25, PA–24–235, and PA–25–260 airplanes due to the configuration discussed above.

We have changed paragraph (m) in
this AD to exclude LAVIASA Models PA–25, PA–24–235, and PA–25–260 airplanes from this requirement.

Request To Allow a Different Rework Method of an Unsealed Wing Lift Strut for Model J–3 Airplanes

Mike Teets stated that he wants the option of using a different method for reworking a non-sealed wing lift strut to a sealed condition for Piper Aircraft Inc. Model J–3 airplanes.

Mike Teets stated that he has been inspecting the wing life struts on his Piper Aircraft, Inc. Model J–3 airplane for years and has developed a method for ‘‘reoperating’’ an unsealed wing life strut to a sealed condition, which would remove the need for the repetitive inspections and thereby reduce costs associated with the requirements of the proposed AD.

We do not agree with the commenter. The commenter’s request pertains to only one model airplane affected by this AD and addresses only a portion of the requirements of the proposed AD. The commenter’s proposal would be more appropriately addressed by requesting an alternative method of compliance following the procedures specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. We have not changed this AD based
on this comment.

Conclusion

We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and any minor editorial changes. We
have determined that these minor changes:

• Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 78729, December 31, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and

• Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 78729, December 31, 2014).

We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1

CFR Part 51

We reviewed Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989; F. Atlee Dodge Aircraft Services,
Inc. Installation Instructions No. 3233– I for Modified Piper Wing Lift Struts Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA4635NM, dated February 1, 1991; and Jensen Aircraft Installation
Instructions for Modified Lift Strut Fittings, which incorporates pages 1 and 5, Original Issue, dated July 15, 1983; pages 2, 4, and 6, Revision No. 1, dated March 30, 1984; and pages a and 3, Revision No. 2, dated April 20, 1984.
The service information describes procedures for wing lift strut assembly inspection and replacement. This information is reasonably available at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
1083, or you may see **ADDRESSES** 

### for other ways to access this service
information.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this AD affects 22,200 airplanes of U.S. registry.

We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD. However, the only difference in the costs presented below
and the costs associated with AD 99– 01–05 R1 is addition of 200 airplanes to the applicability:


## 23701 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

E STIMATED 

### C OSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators

Inspection of the wing lift struts

and wing lift strut forks. 8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 per inspection cycle. Not applicable ......... $680 per inspection cycle. $15,096,000 per inspection cycle. Installation placard .................... 1 work-hour × $85 = $85 ......................... $30 .......................... $115 ........................ $2,553,000.



### We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that will be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these replacements:



### O N 

### -C ONDITION 

### C OSTS

Action Labor cost per wing lift strut Parts cost per wing lift strut Cost per product per wing lift strut

Replacement of the wing lift strut and/or wing lift strut forks 4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 .................. $440 $780



### Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking

action.

Regulatory Findings

We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

**PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS**
**DIRECTIVES**

■ 

### 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

**§ 39.13 [Amended]**

■ 

### 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99–01–05 R1, Amendment 39–17688 (78 FR 73997, December 10, 2013; corrected 78 FR 79599, December 31, 2013), and adding the following new AD:

2015–08–04 Various Aircraft: Amendment 39–18140; Docket No. FAA–2014–1083;
Directorate Identifier 2014–CE–036–AD.

(a) Effective Date

This AD is effective June 3, 2015. (b) Affected ADs

This AD supersedes AD 99–01–05 R1, Amendment 39–17688 (78 FR 73997, December 10, 2013; corrected 78 FR 79599, December 31, 2013) ‘‘AD 99–01–05 R1’’. AD 99–26–19 R1, Amendment 39–17681 (78 FR 76040, December 16, 2013), also relates to the subject of this AD.

(c) Applicability

This AD applies to the following airplanes

identified in Table 1 and Table 2 to paragraph (c) of this AD, that are equipped with wing lift struts, including airplanes commonly known as a ‘‘Clipped Wing Cub,’’ which modify the airplane primarily by removing approximately 40 inches of the inboard portion of each wing; and are certificated in any category.

(1) Based on optional engine installations some airplanes may have been re-identified or registered with another model that is not listed in the type certificate data sheet (TCDS). For instance, Piper Model J3C–65 airplanes are type certificated on Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) A–691 but may also have been re-identified or registered as a Model J3C–115, J3F–50, J3C–75, J3C–75D, J3C–75S, J3L–75, J3C–85, J3C–85S, J3C–90, J3F–90, J3F–90S, J3C–100, or J3–L4J airplane.

(2) The airplane model number on the affected airplane or its registry may or may not contain the dash (-), e.g. J3 and J–3. This AD applies to both variations.

Note 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD: There is a serial number overlap between the Piper PA–18 series airplanes and the Piper Model PA–19 (Army L–18C) airplanes listed in AD 99–01–05 R1. Serial numbers 18–1 through 18–7632 listed for the PA–18 series airplanes

are also now listed under Model PA–19 (Army L–18C) and Model PA–19S.



### T ABLE 

### 1 TO 

### P ARAGRAPH 

### ( C 

### ) OF 

### T HIS 

### AD—A IRPLANES 

### P REVIOUSLY 

### A FFECTED BY 

### AD 99–01–05 R1

Type certificate holder Aircraft model Serial Nos.

FS 2000 Corp ........................... L–14 .................................................................................... ...... All.


## 23702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

T ABLE 

### 1 TO 

### P ARAGRAPH 

### ( C 

### ) OF 

### T HIS 

### AD—A IRPLANES 

### P REVIOUSLY 

### A FFECTED BY 

### AD 99–01–05 R1—Continued

Type certificate holder Aircraft model Serial Nos.

FS 2001 Corp ........................... J5A (Army L–4F), J5A–80, J5B (Army L–4G), J5C, AE–1,

and HE–1. All.

FS 2002 Corporation ................ PA–14 ........................................................................................ 14–1 through 14–523. FS 2003 Corporation ................ PA–12 and PA–12S .................................................................. 12–1 through 12–4036.
LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A.

(LAVIASA). PA–25, PA–25–235, and PA–25–260 ...................................... 25–1 through 25–8156024.

Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... TG–8 (Army TG–8, Navy XLNP–1) .......................................... All. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... E–2 and F–2 ........................................................................... .. All. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... J3C–40, J3C–50, J3C–50S, J3C–65 (Army L–4, L–4B, L–4H, L–4J, Navy NE–1 and NE–2), J3C–65S, J3F–50, J3F–50S, J3F–60, J3F–60S, J3F–65 (Army L–4D), J3F–65S, J3L, J3L–S, J3L–65 (Army L–4C), and J3L–65S. All.

Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... J4, J4A, J4A–S, and J4E (Army L–4E) .................................... 4–401 through 4 –1649. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–11 and PA–11S .................................................................. 11–1 through 11–1678. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–15 ........................................................................................ 15–1 through 15–388. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–16 and PA–16S .................................................................. 16–1 through 16–736. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–17 ........................................................................................ 17–1 through 17–215. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–18, PA–18S, PA–18 ‘‘105’’ (Special), PA–18S ‘‘105’’ (Special), PA–18A, PA–18 ‘‘125’’ (Army L–21A), PA–18S ‘‘125’’, PA–18AS ‘‘125’’, PA–18 ‘‘135’’ (Army L–21B), PA– 18A ‘‘135’’, PA–18S ‘‘135’’, PA–18AS ‘‘135’’, PA–18 ‘‘150’’, PA–18A ‘‘150’’, PA–18S ‘‘150’’, PA–18AS ‘‘150’’, PA–18A (Restricted), PA–18A ‘‘135’’ (Restricted), and PA–18A ‘‘150’’ (Restricted). 18–1 through 18–8309025, 18900 through 1809032, and 1809034 through 1809040.

Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–19 (Army L–18C), and PA–19S ......................................... 18–1 through 18 –7632 and 19–1, 19–2, and

19–3. Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–20, PA–20S, PA–20 ‘‘115’’, PA–20S ‘‘115’’, PA–20 ‘‘135’’,
and PA–20S ‘‘135’’. 20–1 through 20–1121.

Piper Aircraft, Inc ...................... PA–22, PA–22–108, PA–22–135, PA–22S–135, PA–22–150, PA–22S–150, PA–22–160, and PA–22S–160. 22–1 through 22–9848.



### T ABLE 

### 2 TO 

### P ARAGRAPH 

### ( C 

### ) OF 

### T HIS 

### AD—A IRPLANES 

### N EW TO 

### T HIS 

### AD

Type certificate holder Aircraft model Serial Nos.

Piper Aircraft, Inc ............................ J–3 ................................................. 1100 through 1200 and 1999 and up that were manufactured before October 15, 1939. Piper Aircraft, Inc ............................ J3C–65 (Army L–4A) ..................... All. Piper Aircraft, Inc ............................ J3P ................................................. 2325, 2327, 2339, 2340, 2342, 2344, 2345, 2347, 2349, 2351, 2355 and up that were manufactured before January 10, 1942. Piper Aircraft, Inc ............................ J4B ................................................. 4–400 and up that were manufactured before December 11, 1942. Piper Aircraft, Inc ............................ J4F ................................................. 4–828 and up.

(d) Subject

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/ Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

(1) The subject of this AD was originally prompted by reports of corrosion damage found on the wing lift struts. AD 99–01–05 R1 is being superseded to include certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models J–3, J3C–65 (Army L4A), J3P, J4B, and J4F airplanes that were inadvertently omitted from the applicability, paragraph (c), of AD 99–01–05 (64 FR 72524, December 28, 1999) ‘‘99–01–05’’ and subsequently AD 99–01–05 R1.

Note 2 to paragraph (e) of this AD: There is a serial number overlap between the Piper PA–18 series airplanes and the Piper Model PA–19 (Army L–18C) airplanes listed in AD 99–01–05 R1. Serial numbers 18–1 through 18–7632 listed for the PA–18 series airplanes

are also now listed under Model PA–19 (Army L–18C) and Model PA–19S. (2) AD 99–01–05 R1 was issued to clarify the FAA’s intention that if a sealed wing lift strut assembly is installed as a replacement part, the repetitive inspection requirement is terminated only if the seal is never improperly broken. If the seal is improperly broken, then that wing lift strut becomes subject to continued repetitive inspections. We did not intend to promote drilling holes into or otherwise unsealing a sealed strut. This AD retains all the actions required in

AD 99–01–05 R1. There are no new requirements in this AD except for the addition of certain model airplanes to the applicability, paragraph (c) of this AD.

(3) We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion and cracking on the front and rear wing lift struts and forks, which could cause the wing lift strut to fail. This failure could result in the wing separating from the airplane.

(f) Compliance

Unless already done (compliance with AD 99–01–05 R1 and AD 93–10–06, Amendment 39–8586 (58 FR 29965, May 25, 1993) ‘‘AD 93–010–06’’), do the following actions within the compliance times specified in paragraphs (g) through (m) of this AD, including all subparagraphs. Properly unsealing and resealing a sealed wing lift strut is still considered a terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD as long as all appropriate regulations and issues are considered, such as static strength,fatigue, material effects, immediate and longterm (internal and external) corrosion protection, resealing methods, etc. Current FAA regulations in 14 CFR 43.13(b) specify that maintenance performed will result in the part’s condition to be at least equal to its original or properly altered condition. Any

maintenance actions that unseal a sealed wing lift strut should be coordinated with the Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) through the local airworthiness authority ( e.g., Flight Standards District Office). There are provisions in paragraph (n) of this AD for approving such actions as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC).


## 23703 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

(g) Remove Wing Lift Struts

(1) For all airplanes previously affected by

AD 99–01–05 R1: Within 1 calendar month after February 8, 1999 (the effective date retained from AD 99–01–05), or within 24 calendar months after the last inspection
done in accordance with AD 93–10–06 (which was superseded by AD 99–01–05), whichever occurs later, remove the wing lift struts following Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin (Piper MSB) No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Before further flight after the removal, do the actions in one of the following paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(2) For all airplanes new to this AD (not previously affected by AD 99–01–05 R1):
Within 1 calendar month after the effective
date of this AD or within 24 calendar months after the last inspection done in accordance with AD 93–10–06 (which was superseded by AD 99–01–05), whichever occurs later, remove the wing lift struts following Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin (Piper MSB) No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Before further flight after the removal, do the actions in one of the following paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(h) Inspect Wing Lift Struts

For all airplanes listed in this AD: Before further flight after the removal required in paragraph (g) of this AD, inspect each wing lift strut following paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, or do the wing lift strut replacement following one of the options in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD.

(1) Inspect each wing lift strut for corrosion and perceptible dents following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable.

(i) If no corrosion is visible and no perceptible dents are found on any wing lift strut during the inspection required in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, before further flight, apply corrosion inhibitor to each wing lift strut following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Repetitively thereafter inspect each wing lift
strut at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months following the procedures in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(ii) If corrosion or perceptible dents are found on any wing lift strut during the inspection required in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD or during any repetitive inspection required in paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this AD, before further flight, replace the affected wing lift strut with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD. Do the replacement following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.

(2) Inspect each wing lift strut for corrosion following the procedures in the Appendix to this AD. This inspection must be done by a Level 2 or Level 3 inspector certified using the guidelines established by the American Society for Non-destructive Testing or the ‘‘Military Standard for Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification’’ (MIL–STD–410E).

(i) If no corrosion is found on any wing lift strut during the inspection required in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD and all requirements in the Appendix to this AD are

met, before further flight, apply corrosion inhibitor to each wing lift strut following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Repetitively thereafter inspect each wing lift strut at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months following the procedures in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(ii) If corrosion is found on any wing lift strut during the inspection required in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD or during any repetitive inspection required in paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this AD, or if any requirement in the Appendix of this AD is not met, before further flight after any inspection in which corrosion is found or the Appendix requirements are not met, replace the affected wing lift strut with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD. Do the replacement following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.

(i) Wing Lift Strut Replacement Options

Before further flight after the removal required in paragraph (g) of this AD, replace the wing lift struts following one of the options in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, or inspect each wing lift strut following paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.

(1) Install original equipment manufacturer(OEM) part number wing lift struts (or FAAapproved equivalent part numbers) that have been inspected following the procedures in either paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, and are found to be airworthy. Do the installations following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Repetitively thereafter inspect the newly installed wing lift struts at
intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months following the procedures in either paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(2) Install new sealed wing lift strut assemblies (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) (these sealed wing lift strut assemblies also include the wing lift strut forks) following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, and Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Installing one of these new sealed wing lift strut assemblies terminates the repetitive inspection requirements in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, and the wing lift strut fork removal, inspection, and replacement requirement in paragraphs (j) and (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, for that wing lift strut assembly.

(3) Install F. Atlee Dodge wing lift strut assemblies following F. Atlee Dodge Aircraft Services, Inc. Installation Instructions No. 3233–I for Modified Piper Wing Lift Struts Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA4635NM, dated February 1, 1991. Repetitively thereafter inspect the newly installed wing lift struts at intervals not to exceed 60 calendar months following the procedures in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(j) Remove Wing Lift Strut Forks

(1) For all airplanes previously affected by AD 99–01–05 R1, except for Model PA–25, PA–25–235, and PA–25–260 airplanes:
Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after February 8, 1999 (the effective date retained from AD 99–01–05) or within 500 hours TIS after the last inspection done in accordance with AD 93–10–06 (which was superseded by AD 99–01–05), whichever occurs later, remove the wing lift strut forks (unless already replaced in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this AD). Do the removal following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Before further flight after the removal, do the actions in one of the following paragraphs (k) or (l) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(2) For all airplanes new to this AD (not previously affected by AD 99–01–05 R1):
Within the next 100 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD or within 500 hours TIS after the last inspection done in accordance with AD 93–10–06 (which was superseded by AD 99–01–05), whichever occurs later, remove the wing lift strut forks (unless already replaced in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this AD). Do the removal following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Before further flight after the removal, do the actions in one of the following paragraphs (k) or (l) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(k) Inspect and Replace Wing Lift Strut
Forks

For all airplanes affected by this AD: Before further flight after the removal required in paragraph (j) of this AD, inspect the wing lift strut forks following paragraph (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, or do the wing lift strut fork replacement following one of the options in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), or (l)(4) of this AD, including all subparagraphs. Inspect the wing lift strut forks for cracks using magnetic particle procedures, such as those contained in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13–1B, Chapter 5, which can be found on the

Internet http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/
99c827db9baac81b86256b4500596c4e/ $FILE/Chapter%2005.pdf. Repetitively thereafter inspect at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS until the replacement time requirement specified in paragraph (k)(2) or (k)(3) of this AD is reached provided no
cracks are found.

(1) If cracks are found during any inspection required in paragraph (k) of this AD or during any repetitive inspection required in paragraph (k)(2) or (k)(3) of this

AD , before further flight, replace the affected wing lift strut fork with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), or (l)(4) of this AD,


## 23704 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

including all subparagraphs. Do the replacement following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.

(2) If no cracks are found during the initial inspection required in paragraph (k) of this AD and the airplane is currently equipped with floats or has been equipped with floats at any time during the previous 2,000 hours TIS since the wing lift strut forks were
installed , at or before accumulating 1,000 hours TIS on the wing lift strut forks, replace the wing lift strut forks with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), or (l)(4) of this AD, including all subparagraphs. Do the replacement following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable. Repetitively thereafter inspect the newly installed wing lift strut forks at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS following the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(3) If no cracks are found during the initial inspection required in paragraph (k) of this AD and the airplane has never been equipped with floats during the previous 2,000 hours TIS since the wing lift strut forks
were installed , at or before accumulating 2,000 hours TIS on the wing lift strut forks, replace the wing lift strut forks with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), or (l)(4) of this AD, including all subparagraphs. Do the replacement following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable. Repetitively thereafter inspect the newly installed wing lift strut forks at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS following the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(l) Wing Lift Strut Fork Replacement Options

Before further flight after the removal required in paragraph (j) of this AD, replace the wing lift strut forks following one of the options in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), or (l)(4) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, or inspect the wing lift strut forks following paragraph (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(1) Install new OEM part number wing lift strut forks of the same part numbers of the existing part (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) that were manufactured with rolled threads. Wing lift strut forks manufactured with machine (cut) threads are not to be used. Do the installations following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. Repetitively thereafter inspect and replace the newly installed wing
lift strut forks at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS following the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(2) Install new sealed wing lift strut assemblies (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) (these sealed wing lift strut assemblies also include the wing lift strut forks) following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, and Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. This installation may have already been done through the option specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Installing one of these new sealed wing lift strut assemblies terminates the repetitive inspection requirements in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, and the wing lift strut fork removal, inspection, and replacement requirements in paragraphs (j) and (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, for that wing lift strut assembly.

(3) For the airplanes specified below

, install Jensen Aircraft wing lift strut fork assemblies specified below in the applicable STC following Jensen Aircraft Installation Instructions for Modified Lift Strut Fitting. Installing one of these wing lift strut fork assemblies terminates the repetitive inspection requirement of this AD only for that wing lift strut fork. Repetitively inspect each wing lift strut as specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(i) For Models PA–12 and PA–12S airplanes: STC SA1583NM, which can be
found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/ Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_Library/rgstc.nsf/
0/2E708575849845B285256CC1008213CA ?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa1583nm;

(ii) For Model PA–14 airplanes: STC SA1584NM, which can be found on the

Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/39872B8 14471737685256CC1008213D0?Open Document&Highlight=sa1584nm;

(iii) For Models PA–16 and PA–16S airplanes: STC SA1590NM, which can be
found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/ Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_Library/rgstc.nsf/
0/B28C4162E30D941F85256CC1008213F6? OpenDocument&Highlight=sa1590nm;

(iv) For Models PA–18, PA–18S, PA–18 ‘‘105’’ (Special), PA–18S ‘‘105’’ (Special), PA–18A, PA–18 ‘‘125’’ (Army L–21A), PA–
18S ‘‘125’’, PA–18AS ‘‘125’’, PA–18 ‘‘135’’ (Army L–21B), PA–18A ‘‘135’’, PA–18S
‘‘135’’, PA–18AS ‘‘135’’, PA–18 ‘‘150’’, PA– 18A ‘‘150’’, PA–18S ‘‘150’’, PA–18AS ‘‘150’’, PA–18A (Restricted), PA–18A ‘‘135’’ (Restricted), and PA–18A ‘‘150’’ (Restricted) airplanes: STC SA1585NM, which can be
found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/ Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_Library/rgstc.nsf/
0/A2BE010FB1CA61A285256CC1008213D6 ?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa1585nm;

(v) For Models PA–20, PA–20S, PA–20 ‘‘115’’, PA–20S ‘‘115’’, PA–20 ‘‘135’’, and PA–20S ‘‘135’’ airplanes: STC SA1586NM,
which can be found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_ Library/rgstc.nsf/0/873CC69D42C87CF5852 56CC1008213DC?OpenDocument& Highlight=sa1586nm; and

(vi) For Model PA–22 airplanes: STC SA1587NM, which can be found on the

Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory

_ and

_ Guidance

_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/B051D04 CCC0BED7E85256CC1008213E0?Open Document&Highlight=sa1587nm.

(4) Install F. Atlee Dodge wing lift strut assemblies following F. Atlee Dodge
Installation Instructions No. 3233–I for Modified Piper Wing Lift Struts (STC SA4635NM), dated February 1, 1991. This installation may have already been done in accordance paragraph (i)(3) of this AD. Installing these wing lift strut assemblies terminates the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD for the wing lift strut fork only. Repetitively inspect the wing lift struts as specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(m) Install Placard

(1) For all airplanes previously affected by AD 99–01–05 R1, except for Models PA–25, PA–25–235, and PA–25–260 airplanes: Within 1 calendar month after February 8, 1999 (the effective date retained from AD 99– 01–05), or within 24 calendar months after the last inspection required by AD 93–10–06 (which was superseded by AD 99–01–05), whichever occurs later, and before further flight after any replacement of a wing lift strut assembly required by this AD, do one of the following actions in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or (m)(1)(ii) of this AD. The ‘‘NO STEP’’ markings required by paragraph (m)(1)(i) or (m)(1)(ii) of this AD must remain in place for the life of the airplane.

(i) Install ‘‘NO STEP’’ decal, Piper (P/N) 80944–02, on each wing lift strut approximately 6 inches from the bottom of the wing lift strut in a way that the letters can be read when entering and exiting the airplane; or

(ii) Paint the words ‘‘NO STEP’’ approximately 6 inches from the bottom of the wing lift strut in a way that the letters can be read when entering and exiting the airplane. Use a minimum of 1-inch letters using a color that contrasts with the color of the airplane.

(2) For all airplanes new to this AD (not previously affected by AD 99–01–05 R1):
Within 1 calendar month after the effective
date of this AD or within 24 calendar months after the last inspection required by AD 93– 10–06 (which was superseded by AD 99–01– 05), whichever occurs later, and before further flight after any replacement of a wing lift strut assembly required by this AD, do one of the following actions in paragraph (m)(2)(i) or (m)(2)(ii) of this AD. The ‘‘NO STEP’’ markings required by paragraph (m)(2)(i) or (m)(2)(ii) of this AD must remain in place for the life of the airplane.

(i) Install ‘‘NO STEP’’ decal, Piper (P/N) 80944–02, on each wing lift strut approximately 6 inches from the bottom of the wing lift strut in a way that the letters can be read when entering and exiting the airplane; or

(ii) Paint the words ‘‘NO STEP’’ approximately 6 inches from the bottom of the wing lift strut in a way that the letters can be read when entering and exiting the airplane. Use a minimum of 1-inch letters using a color that contrasts with the color of the airplane.

(n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD related to Piper Aircraft, Inc. airplanes; the Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD related to FS 2000 Corp, FS 2001 Corp, FS 2002 Corporation, and FS 2003 Corporation airplanes; and the Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD related to LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA) airplanes, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In


## 23705 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the appropriate person identified in paragraph (o) of this AD.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office.

(3) AMOCs approved for AD 93–10–06, AD 99–01–05, and AD 99–01–05 R1, are approved as AMOCs for this AD.

(o) Related Information

(1) For more information about this AD related to Piper Aircraft, Inc. airplanes, contact: Gregory ‘‘Keith’’ Noles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474–5551; fax: (404) 474–5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov

.

(2) For more information about this AD related to FS 2000 Corp, FS 2001 Corp, FS 2002 Corporation, and FS 2003 Corporation airplanes, contact: Jeff Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057; phone: (425) 917–6405; fax: (245) 917–6590;
email: jeff.morfitt@faa.gov

.

(3) For more information about this AD
related to LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA) airplanes, contact: S.M. Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4145; fax: (816) 329–4090; email: sarjapur.nagarajan@faa.gov

. (p) Material Incorporated by Reference

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.

(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on February 8, 1999 (63 FR 72132, December 31, 1998).

(i) Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 528D, dated October 19,

1990.

(ii) Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 910A, dated October 10,

1989.

(iii) F. Atlee Dodge Aircraft Services, Inc.
Installation Instructions No. 3233–I for Modified Piper Wing Lift Struts Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA4635NM, dated February 1, 1991.

(iv) Jensen Aircraft Installation Instructions for Modified Lift Strut Fittings, which incorporates pages 1 and 5, Original Issue, dated July 15, 1983; pages 2, 4, and 6, Revision No. 1, dated March 30, 1984; and pages a and 3, Revision No. 2, dated April

20, 1984.

(4) For Piper Aircraft, Inc. service information identified in this AD, contact Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Services, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960; telephone: (772) 567–4361; Internet: www.piper.com . Copies of the instructions to the F. Atlee Dodge STC and information about the Jensen Aircraft STCs may be obtained from F. Atlee Dodge, Aircraft Services, LLC., 6672 Wes Way, Anchorage, Alaska 99518–0409, Internet: www.fadodge.com

.

(5) You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. It is also available
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.

FAA–2014–1083.

(6) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: http://www.archives. gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html

. Appendix to AD 2015–08–04

Procedures and Requirements for Ultrasonic Inspection of Piper Wing Lift Struts

Equipment Requirements

1. A portable ultrasonic thickness gauge or flaw detector with echo-to-echo digital thickness readout capable of reading to 0.001-inch and an A-trace waveform display will be needed to do this inspection.

2. An ultrasonic probe with the following specifications will be needed to accomplish this inspection: 10 MHz (or higher), 0.283- inch (or smaller) diameter dual element or delay line transducer designed for thickness gauging. The transducer and ultrasonic system shall be capable of accurately measuring the thickness of AISI 4340 steel down to 0.020-inch. An accuracy of +/ ¥ 0.002-inch throughout a 0.020-inch to 0.050- inch thickness range while calibrating shall be the criteria for acceptance.

3. Either a precision machined step wedge made of 4340 steel (or similar steel with equivalent sound velocity) or at least three shim samples of same material will be needed to accomplish this inspection. One thickness of the step wedge or shim shall be less than or equal to 0.020-inch, one shall be greater than or equal to 0.050-inch, and at least one other step or shim shall be between
these two values.

4. Glycerin, light oil, or similar non-water based ultrasonic couplants are recommended in the setup and inspection procedures. Water-based couplants, containing appropriate corrosion inhibitors, may be utilized, provided they are removed from
both the reference standards and the test item after the inspection procedure is completed and adequate corrosion prevention steps are then taken to protect these items.

• NOTE: Couplant is defined as ‘‘a
substance used between the face of the transducer and test surface to improve transmission of ultrasonic energy across the
transducer/strut interface.’’

• NOTE: If surface roughness due to paint loss or corrosion is present, the surface should be sanded or polished smooth before testing to assure a consistent and smooth surface for making contact with the transducer. Care shall be taken to remove a
minimal amount of structural material. Paint repairs may be necessary after the inspection to prevent further corrosion damage from occurring. Removal of surface irregularities will enhance the accuracy of the inspection technique.

1. Set up the ultrasonic equipment for thickness measurements as specified in the
instrument’s user’s manual. Because of the variety of equipment available to perform ultrasonic thickness measurements, some modification to this general setup procedure may be necessary. However, the tolerance requirement of step 13 and the record keeping requirement of step 14, must be
satisfied.

2. If battery power will be employed, check to see that the battery has been properly charged. The testing will take approximately two hours. Screen brightness and contrast
should be set to match environmental
conditions.

3. Verify that the instrument is set for the type of transducer being used, i.e. single or dual element, and that the frequency setting is compatible with the transducer.

4. If a removable delay line is used, remove it and place a drop of couplant between the transducer face and the delay line to assure good transmission of ultrasonic energy. Reassemble the delay line transducer and

continue.

5. Program a velocity of 0.231-inch/
microsecond into the ultrasonic unit unless
an alternative instrument calibration procedure is used to set the sound velocity.

6. Obtain a step wedge or steel shims per item 3 of the EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS. Place the probe on the thickest sample using couplant. Rotate the transducer slightly back and forth to ‘‘ring’’ the transducer to the sample. Adjust the delay and range settings to arrive at an A-trace signal display with the
first backwall echo from the steel near the left
side of the screen and the second backwall echo near the right of the screen. Note that when a single element transducer is used, the initial pulse and the delay line/steel interface will be off of the screen to the left. Adjust the gain to place the amplitude of the first backwall signal at approximately 80% screen height on the A-trace.

7. ‘‘Ring’’ the transducer on the thinnest step or shim using couplant. Select positive half-wave rectified, negative half-wave rectified, or filtered signal display to obtain the cleanest signal. Adjust the pulse voltage, pulse width, and damping to obtain the best signal resolution. These settings can vary
from one transducer to another and are also user dependent.

8. Enable the thickness gate, and adjust the gate so that it starts at the first backwall echo
and ends at the second backwall echo. (Measuring between the first and second backwall echoes will produce a measurement of the steel thickness that is not affected by the paint layer on the strut). If instability of the gate trigger occurs, adjust the gain, gate level, and/or damping to stabilize the thickness reading.

9. Check the digital display reading and if it does not agree with the known thickness of the thinnest thickness, follow your
instrument’s calibration recommendations to


## 23706 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

produce the correct thickness reading. When a single element transducer is used this will usually involve adjusting the fine delay setting.

10. Place the transducer on the thickest step of shim using couplant. Adjust the thickness gate width so that the gate is triggered by the second backwall reflection of the thick section. If the digital display does not agree with the thickest thickness, follow your instruments calibration recommendations to produce the correct thickness reading. A slight adjustment in the velocity may be necessary to get both the thinnest and the thickest reading correct. Document the changed velocity value.

11. Place couplant on an area of the lift strut which is thought to be free of corrosion and ‘‘ring’’ the transducer to surface. Minor adjustments to the signal and gate settings may be required to account for coupling improvements resulting from the paint layer. The thickness gate level should be set just high enough so as not to be triggered by irrelevant signal noise. An area on the upper surface of the lift strut above the inspection area would be a good location to complete this step and should produce a thickness reading between 0.034-inch and 0.041-inch.

12. Repeat steps 8, 9, 10, and 11 until both
thick and thin shim measurements are within
tolerance and the lift strut measurement is reasonable and steady.

13. Verify that the thickness value shown in the digital display is within +/ ¥ 0.002- inch of the correct value for each of the three or more steps of the setup wedge or shims. Make no further adjustments to the instrument settings.

14. Record the ultrasonic versus actual thickness of all wedge steps or steel shims available as a record of setup.

1. Clean the lower 18 inches of the wing lift struts using a cleaner that will remove all dirt and grease. Dirt and grease will adversely affect the accuracy of the inspection technique. Light sanding or polishing may also be required to reduce surface roughness as noted in the EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS section.

2. Using a flexible ruler, draw a 1/4-inch grid on the surface of the first 11 inches from the lower end of the strut as shown in Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable. This can be done using a soft (#2) pencil and should be done on both faces of the strut. As an alternative to drawing a complete grid, make two rows of marks spaced every 1/4-inch across the width of the
strut. One row of marks should be about 11 inches from the lower end of the strut, and
the second row should be several inches away where the strut starts to narrow. Lay the flexible ruler between respective tick marks of the two rows and use tape or a rubber band to keep the ruler in place. See Figure 1.

3. Apply a generous amount of couplant inside each of the square areas or along the edge of the ruler. Re-application of couplant may be necessary.

4. Place the transducer inside the first square area of the drawn grid or at the first 1/4-inch mark on the ruler and ‘‘ring’’ the transducer to the strut. When using a dual element transducer, be very careful to record
the thickness value with the axis of the transducer elements perpendicular to any curvature in the strut. If this is not done, loss of signal or inaccurate readings can result.

5. Take readings inside each square on the grid or at 1/4-inch increments along the ruler and record the results. When taking a thickness reading, rotate the transducer slightly back and forth and experiment with the angle of contact to produce the lowest thickness reading possible. Pay close attention to the A-scan display to assure that the thickness gate is triggering off of
maximized backwall echoes. • NOTE: A reading shall not exceed .041 inch. If a reading exceeds .041-inch, repeat steps 13 and 14 of the INSTRUMENT SETUP section before proceeding further.

6. If the A-trace is unsteady or the thickness reading is clearly wrong, adjust the signal gain and/or gate setting to obtain reasonable and steady readings. If any instrument setting is adjusted, repeat steps 13

and 14 of the INSTRUMENT SETUP section before proceeding further.

7. In areas where obstructions are present, take a data point as close to the correct area as possible.

• NOTE: The strut wall contains a fabrication bead at approximately 40% of the strut chord. The bead may interfere with accurate measurements in that specific

location.

8. A measurement of 0.024-inch or less shall require replacement of the strut prior to further flight.

9. If at any time during testing an area is

encountered where a valid thickness

measurement cannot be obtained due to a loss of signal strength or quality, the area shall be considered suspect. These areas may have a remaining wall thickness of less than 0.020-inch, which is below the range of this setup, or they may have small areas of localized corrosion or pitting present. The latter case will result in a reduction in signal strength due to the sound being scattered from the rough surface and may result in a signal that includes echoes from the pits as well as the backwall. The suspect area(s)

shall be tested with a Maule ‘‘Fabric Tester’’ as specified in Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989.

10. Record the lift strut inspection in the aircraft log book.


## 23707 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April

8, 2015.
Earl Lawrence, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2015–08732 Filed 4–28–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**



### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2014–0745; Airspace Docket No. 14–ACE–3]** 



### Establishment of Class E Airspace; **Alma, NE**

**AGENCY** 

### : Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION** 

### : Final rule.

**SUMMARY** 

### : This action establishes Class E airspace at Alma, NE. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Alma Municipal Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport. This
action also corrects the state from KS to NE under the airport designation.

**DATES** 

### : Effective date, 0901 UTC, June 25, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**ADDRESSES** 

### : FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and subsequent amendments can
be viewed on line at http://www.faa. gov/airtraffic/publications/. The Order is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to http://www.archives.gov/ federal

_ register/code

_ of

_federalregulations/ibr

_ locations.html. FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15. For further information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and ATC Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 29591; telephone: 202–

267–8783.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** 

### : Rebecca Shelby, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321–

7740.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** 

### :
History

On October 28, 2014, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Alma Municipal Airport, Alma, NE (79 FR 64152) Docket No. FAA–2014– 0745. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Subsequent to publications, an error was found under the airport designation listing the airport in KS, instead of NE. This action
corrects the error.

Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9Y dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the
Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by
Reference

This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Y, airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as
listed in the **ADDRESSES** 

### section of this
final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

The Rule

This action amends Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Alma Municipal Airport, Alma, NE. Controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at the airport. This action enhances the safety and management of IFR operations for SIAPs at the airport. This action also correctly lists the airport state as NE instead of KS under the airport designation.

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it establishes controlled airspace at Alma Municipal Airport, Alma, NE.

Environmental Review

The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical under the National Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E,— ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures’’ paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exit that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND**
**REPORTING POINTS**

■ 

### 1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g);, 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 

### 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,