alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT NOVEMBER 30, 1995 AND FEBRUARY 28,
1995 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE NINE AND
THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1995 AND 1994. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000001761
<NAME> TRANZONIC COMPANIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       4,984,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,624,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,825,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,414,881
<PP&E>                                      22,190,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,950,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,614,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       998,885<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,028,488<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,950,045
<SALES>                                    122,224,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           122,224,052
<CGS>                                       85,284,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              116,839,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             554,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,888,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,752,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,135,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>This figure includes $664,667 Class A Common and $334,218 Class B Common Shares
<F2>This figure includes $5,771,666 in additional paid-in capital and $52,256,822
in retained earnings.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
OCT-04-201 0 11:3 5 Fftf t RENTO N P.02/0 2 

# O r ^ -PM i oT » iriii T r\ C Transpor t Airplan e Directorat e U.S . Departmen t OhPARTMEN T U r16O I Lin d AvSnue , S.W . o f Ttansportotto n ' - ANSPORTATiO N Renton . Washingto n 98057-335 6 F«dora l Aviatio n : ••''•^• ] OPERATION S Admlnlsfrotlo n Septembe r 30,201 0 

## m m- u p 

## 2:U 5 Ms . Christin e Thompso n Lea d Projec t Adnunistrator , Developmen t Project s The Boeing Compan

y P . O . Bo x 3707 , M

C 67-L R Seattle , W A 98124-220 7 Dea r Ms . Thompson : W e hav e receive d you

r Septembe r 24,2010 , petitio n fo

r exemptio n fromth e requirement s o f Titl e 14 , Cod

e o f Federa l Regulation s (1 4 CFR

) 25.809(a) , fo

r alimite dnumbe

r of Boein g Model 787- 8 airplanes . You r request , which wa s submitte d to th e Departmen t of Transportation' s Federa

l Documen t Managemen

t Syste m(Docke t No . FA A 2010-0990) , i s bein g processe db y thi s office . W e hav e determine d tha

t you hav e shown goo dcaus e fo r no t delayin g actio n on you

r petitio n by th e publicatio n and commen t procedure s require db y 1 4 CF R11.87 . W

e wil l advis e you o

f ou r final decisio n o n you

r petitio n a s soo

n a s possible . In th e meantime , i f

you hav e an

y question s o

r concern s regardin g you

r petition s or

th e petitio n process , pleas e contac t Jef f Gardlin , a t 425-227-2136 , or

a t Jeff.Gardlin@faa.gov . Sincerely , JanTho r Technica l Writer-Editor Standardizatio n Branch Transpor t Standard s Staf

f Transpor t Airplan e Directorat

e Aircraf t Certificatio n Servic e

TOTP L P.0 2
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ari Muljana, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manas Petroleum
      Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (b) | information contained in the quarterly report on Form
      10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Manas Petroleum
Corporation.                                  

Date: November 23, 2009



/s/ Ari
MuljanaAri Muljana Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Manas Petroleum
Corporation and will be retained by Manas Petroleum Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.205 What are the language requirements for deepwater port personnel?

Only persons who read, write, and speak English may occupy the essential management positions outlined in the operations manual.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39182, July 1, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-00-022] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

June 2, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

1. Agenda for future meeting: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-853 (Final) (Structural Steel Beams from Japan)—briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on June 9, 2000.) 

5. Inv. Nos. AA1921-143 and 731-TA-341, 343-345, 391-397, and 399 (Review) (Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore, Sweden, and the United Kingdom)—briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on June 16, 2000.) 

6. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: May 23, 2000. 

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-13808 Filed 5-30-00; 10:17 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Traffic safety facts.Pedalcyclists**
 
1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004
 
SuDoc Number:TD 8.2:T 67/13/ | TD 8.27: | TD8.27/11:
Item Number:0982-D-19 | 0982-D-59
CGP systemNumber:000569318
 
November 21, 2019
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.501 Teche Bayou. ( a ) The draws of the following bridges shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given: ( 1 ) St. Mary Parish bridge, mile 3.9 at Calumet.
( 2 ) St. Mary Parish bridge, mile 11.8 at Centerville.
( 3 ) S3069 bridge, mile 16.3 at Franklin.
( 4 ) S322 bridge, mile 17.2 at Franklin.
( 5 ) S323 bridge, mile 22.3 at Oaklawn.
( 6 ) St. Mary Parish bridge, mile 27.0 at Baldwin.
( 7 ) S324 bridge, mile 32.5 at Charenton.
( 8 ) S670 bridge, mile 37.0 at Adeline.
( 9 ) St. Mary Parish bridge, mile 38.9 at Sorrel.
( 10 ) S671 bridge, mile 41.8 at Jeanerette.
( 11 ) S3182 bridge, mile 43.5 at Jeanerette.
( 12 ) LSU Agri bridge, mile 46.5 near Jeanerette (notice required for opening from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday except holidays).
( 13 ) S320 bridge, mile 48.7 at Olivier.
( 14 ) S3195 bridge, mile 50.4 at New Iberia.
( 15 ) S87 Spur bridge, mile 52.5 at New Iberia.
( 16 ) S86 bridge, mile 53.0 at New Iberia.
( 17 ) S3156 bridge, mile 53.3 at New Iberia.
( 18 ) S44 bridge, mile 56.7 at Morbihan.
( 19 ) Iberia Parish bridge, mile 58.0 at New Iberia.
( 20 ) Iberia Parish bridge, mile 60.7 at Vida.
( 21 ) S344 bridge, mile 62.5 at Loreauville.
( 22 ) S86 bridge, mile 69.0 at Daspit.
( 23 ) S92 bridge, mile 73.3 at St. Martinville.
( b ) The draws of the S96 bridge, mile 75.2 at St. Martinville, and the S350 bridge, mile 82.0 at Parks, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
( c ) The draws of the S31 bridge, mile 90.5, at Breaux Bridge, and the Union Pacific railroad bridge, mile 91.0 at Breaux Bridge, shall open on signal if at least 48 hours notice is given.
( d ) The draws of the bridges listed in paragraph (a) of this section shall open on less than four hours notice for an emergency during the advance notice period, and shall open on signal should a temporary surge in waterway traffic occur.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD 08-83-04, 49 FR 35936, Sept. 13, 1984; CGD 8-85-16, 50 FR 50164, Dec. 9, 1985; CGD8-86-09, 52 FR 3225, Feb. 3, 1987; CGD8-89-12, 54 FR 53056, Dec. 27, 1989; CGD08-93-015, 58 FR 43264, Aug. 16, 1993; USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35527, June 30, 1998; CGD08-03-032, 68 FR 55006, Sept. 22, 2003]
#### § 779.115 Watchmen and guards.

Watchmen or guards employed by retail businesses who protect the warehouses, workshops, or store premises where goods moving in interstate or foreign commerce are kept or where goods are produced for such commerce, are covered under the Act.
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t

Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003). 

NO. 07-03-0254-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JUNE 11, 2003

______________________________

EDWARD SANCHEZ HINAJAS AKA EDWARD SANCHEZ

HINOJOSA AKA EDWARD SANCHEZ HINOJOS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 46,044-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING

_______________________________

DISMISSAL 

_______________________________ 

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

Appellant, Edward Sanchez Hinajas, appeals his conviction for Aggravated Sexual

Assault of a Child. We dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. 
2

The judgment indicates that sentence was imposed on March 13, 2003. Appellant

then filed a document purporting to be a notice of appeal on May 22, 2003. No motion for

new trial was filed. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the

sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a

motion for new trial is filed. TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a). Thus, appellant's notice of appeal was

due to be filed on or about April 14, 2003, but was not filed until May 22, 2003.

Furthermore, he did not move for an extension of the deadline.

A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo

v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If the notice is not timely, then the

court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523.

Because appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction to

consider the appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.185 Pacheco Creek.

The draw of the Contra Costa County highway bridge, mile 1.0, and Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 1.1, both near Martinez, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.

[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD 12-85-02, 50 FR 20758, May 20, 1985]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-1780-000 and ER00-1780-001]


Texas Electric Marketing, L.L.C., Notice of Issuance of Order

May 25, 2000.
    Texas Electric Marketing, L.L.C. (Texas Electric) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Texas Electric will engage in 
wholesale electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Texas 
Electric also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In 
particular, Texas Electric requested that the Commission grant blanket 
approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Texas Electric.
    On May 18, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Texas Electric should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Texas Electric is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Texas Electric's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline of filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 19, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commissions's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Interenet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13639 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**-  Northern Plains  
-  Fort Collins, CO 
-  Soil Plant Nutrient Research (SPNR) 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced SearchPrograms and ProjectsNLEAP UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 					Research /							**Research Project:**USDA U.S. Agriculture and Forestry Greenhouse Gas Inventory
**Location: Soil Plant Nutrient Research (SPNR)**
**2005 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**								This report serves to document research conducted under Specific Cooperative Agreement #58-5402-4-0387 between ARS and Colorado State University. Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent project 5402-11000-007-00D Interactions Between Land Use Land Management, and Climate Change: Relations to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling, Trace Gases and Agroecosystems.
The 2006 U.S. Agriculture and Forestry Greenhouse Gas Inventory and subsequent inventories will incorporate new methodologies that apply the most recent advances in the DAYCENT computer simulation model. DAYCENT will be used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from major cropping systems and rangelands in the U.S. CSU has the computing resources and programming personal required to run DAYCENT that the Soil Plant Nutrient Research Unit lacks. SPNR has worked with CSU to improve the crop growth submodel in DAYCENT and to acquire climate, soils, and land use data needed to drive the model at the county and sub-county levels.  Programming staff and computer hardware housed at CSU have also assisted SPNR in developing a prototype SQL database which can be also be adapted for use in developing the ARS GRACEnet data base.
    Project TeamFollett, Ronald  - *Ron* William Parton - Sr. Research Scientist  
Project Annual Reports FY 2005 
Related National Programs Soil Resource Management(202) Global Change(204)  							Last Modified: 09/29/2006 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |FirstGov |White House

**
TS – 11KK6F, Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, TGA Trace

Reacted
§ 147.851 Jack St. Malo Semi-Sub Facility Safety Zone. ( a ) *Description.* The Jack St. Malo Semi-Sub facility is in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Walker Ridge block 718. The facility is located at 26°14′5.94′′ N, 91°15′39.99′′ W and the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel;
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a designated representative.
[USCG-2013-0874, 79 FR 52561, Sept. 4, 2014]
§ 778.501 The “split-day” plan. ( a ) Another device designed to evade the overtime requirements of the Act was a plan known as the “Poxon” or “split-day” plan. Under this plan the normal or regular workday is artificially divided into two portions one of which is arbitrarily labeled the “straight time” portion of the day and the other the “overtime” portion. Under such a plan, an employee who would ordinarily command an hourly rate of pay well in excess of the minimum for his work is assigned a low hourly rate (often the minimum) for the first hour (or the first 2 or 4 hours) of each day. This rate is designated as the regular rate: “time and one-half” based on such rate is paid for each additional hour worked during the workday. Thus, for example, an employee is arbitrarily assigned an hourly rate of $5 per hour under a contract which provides for the payment of so-called “overtime” for all hours in excess of 4 per day. Thus, for the normal or regular 8-hour day the employee would receive $20 for the first 4 hours and $30 for the remaining 4 hours; and a total of $50 for 8 hours. (This is exactly what he would receive at the straight time rate of $6.25 per hour.) On the sixth 8-hour day the employee likewise receives $50 and the employer claims to owe no additional overtime pay under the statute since he has already compensated the employee at “overtime” rates for 20 hours of the workweek.
( b ) Such a division of the normal 8-hour workday into 4 straight time hours and 4 overtime hours is purely fictitious. The employee is not paid at the rate of $5 an hour and the alleged overtime rate of $7.50 per hour is not paid for overtime work. It is not geared either to hours “in excess of the employee's normal working hours or regular working hours” (section 7(e)(5) or for work “outside of the hours established in good faith * * * as the basic, normal, or regular workday” (section 7(e) (7)) and it cannot therefore qualify as an overtime rate. The regular rate of pay of the employee in this situation is $6.25 per hour and he is owed additional overtime compensation, based on this rate, for all hours in excess of the applicable maximum hours standard. This rule was settled by the Supreme Court in the case of *Walling* v. *Helmerich & Payne,* 323 U.S. 37, and its validity has been reemphasized by the definition of the term “regular rate” in section 7(e) of the Act as amended.
[46 FR 7318, Jan. 23, 1981; 46 FR 33516, June 30, 1981]