alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

Delivery Logistics: Questions to 

Consider

Who will deliver the meals?

• Paid staff, volunteers, or both!

• Note: scheduling software can help ensure adequate staffing.

How do I train and direct my staff?

• Determine the how/where/when and try to plan for multiple sessions. 

• Offer a ride along experience for new drivers.

• Create training videos for your program as a time management strategy. 

• Provide driver instructions on paper or via apps.

o Use apps that can help streamline communication, providing driving 

directions and special instructions for participant deliveries as well as 

reporting changes in condition. 

o If these systems are used, it may also be helpful to have instructions 

printed for the delivery drivers to reference while they are on a route.

• Provide time and temperature requirements for meals and deliveries.

• Be sure drivers have the appropriate contact information in the case of a 

question or emergency.

How do I keep my food deliveries safe?

• Drivers should be trained in basic food safety principles, such as through a 

program called Food Safety on the Go

• Try to create the shortest routes possible. 
2

o Many programs report using route optimization software, like 

ServTracker, ZippyMeals, BringFood, Route4Me and even Google Maps. 

• Temperature checks are needed before and at the end of the route.

• It is also important to have drivers record their pick-up and delivery times in 

the case of any audits.

How can I make sure my meals are safe and high-quality 

during and after transit?

• Ask yourself if the meal will “travel” well – will breaded items become soggy, 

for example?

• Develop systems for clear and accurate labeling of special meals, like choice 

menus or therapeutic diets, to ensure they are provided to the right individual.

• Use a thermal box or bag for transport to keep the foods at the appropriate 

temperature and log your temperatures. 

• Package foods appropriately! For example, soup may need to be in a special 

spill proof bowl. Hot foods will need to be kept separate from cold foods. 

• Imagine you are the participant. How would you prefer the meal to look and 

taste?

• Ensure meals spend a limited amount of time in transit before they are 

consumed.

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for 

Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. 

Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express 

freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily 

represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services 

Programs. For more information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

WILLIAM D. DOWNES, JR., § 

 § No. 358, 2014 

Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court 

 § of the State of Delaware in and 

 v. § for Sussex County 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § Cr. ID No. 9408020702 

Plaintiff Below, § 

Appellee. § 

Submitted: September 9, 2014 

Decided: September 10, 2014 

 O R D E R 

This 10th day of September 2014, it appears to the Court that, on 

August 27, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause 

why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to diligently 

prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix and for his 

failure to pay the required filing fee. The appellant has failed to respond to 

the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period. Consequently, 

dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Randy J. Holland 

 Justice
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 641 

Congratulating the Focus on the Family radio program for its induction 

into the National Radio Hall of Fame. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2008 

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. HATCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

MARTINEZ, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Focus on the Family radio program for 

its induction into the National Radio Hall of Fame. 

Whereas the National Radio Hall of Fame & Museum was 

created to commemorate significant figures in the world 

of radio, a medium that has been integral to American 

society since the early 20th century; 

Whereas a key element of the mission of the National Radio 

Hall of Fame & Museum is to recognize and showcase 

contemporary talent from diverse radio programming formats; 

Whereas, each November since 1992, significant radio figures 

have been honored for their excellence in the field of 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 641 IS 

radio by being inducted into the National Radio Hall of 

Fame; 

Whereas James C. Dobson, Ph.D., is founder and chairman 

of Focus on the Family; 

Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program first aired 

in 1977 and now is heard through more than 3,000 radio 

outlets in North America and in 27 languages in over 

160 other countries; 

Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program has benefitted the lives of families and individuals across the 

United States and around the world; 

Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program has been 

named as a 2008 inductee to the National Radio Hall of 

Fame; and 

Whereas the Focus on the Family radio program is the first 

faith-based radio program to receive this honor: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Focus on 

2 the Family radio program, its staff, and its founder and 

3 chairman, James Dobson, for their excellence in radio pro4 gramming and the program’s worthy induction into the 

5 National Radio Hall of Fame. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-64892A; File No. SR-FINRA-2011-034]

FR Doc. No. 2011-18221, beginning on page 43360 for Wednesday, July 20, 2011, contained an error. Release No. 34-64892 (“Release”) approved a proposed rule change on an accelerated basis filed by FINRA (File No. SR-FINRA-2011-034). Section V of the Release was inadvertently omitted. Accordingly, the conclusion of the Release is added to read as noted below. On page 43363, column 1, following line 6, insert:

## “V. Conclusion

*It is therefore ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[1]                                          that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2011-034), be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.”                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[2] 

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2011-21190 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
NUMBER 13-19-00206-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

HOLT TEXAS, LTD., Appellant,

v.

EUSTACIO RUBIO D/B/A DELATA 

AGGREGATE & LANDSCAPING 

MATERIALS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Holt Texas, Ltd., perfected an interlocutory appeal from an order

rendered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in trial court cause

number C-1839-18-C, denying appellant’s motion to compel arbitration. See TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.016. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to 
2

stay trial court proceedings pending resolution of the interlocutory appeal. 

Appellant requests a stay of the trial court proceedings during the pendency of the

appeal. 

Having reviewed appellant’s unopposed motion, we hereby GRANT the motion. 

We order all proceedings in trial court cause number C-1839-18-C STAYED until 

further order of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM 

Delivered and filed the

11th day of June, 2019.
#### Ayres *v.*Wells’ Adm’r.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*April 11,*1889.)

[9 S. E. Rep. 326.]

Appeal — Review—Sufficiency of Evidence.

Where upon the question of whether the assignment of a bond secured by a deed of trust to the trustee was intended by the payee to pass the ownership of the bond the evidence is conflicting, the decree of the circuit court will be affirmed.

Appeal from circuit court, Pittsylvania county ; S. Gr.. Whittle, Judge.

Bill by Alfred Anderson, administrator *O. t. a.*of Nancy Wells, deceased, against David Ayres and John T. Blankenship, to remove said Ayres from his position as trustee in a deed of trust executed by said Blankenship to secure a debt due said testatrix. Decree for complainant, and defendant Ayres appeals.

*W. W.*Henry, for appellant.

*Peatross &*Harris, for appellee.

Lacy, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Pittsylvania county, rendered on the 9th day of February, 1888. The case is as follows : The suit was instituted by the bill of the appellee seeking to enforce the payment of the bond of *693one Blankenship, of $700; secured by trust-deed, alleged to be due to the estate of his testatrix, Nancy Wells, and seeking to have the trustee, the appellant, David Ayres, removed as such. The trustee, David Ayres, answered, claiming to be the legal owner of the bond in question by an assignment by the testatrix shortly before her death. Depositions were taken in the cause, and by decree in the cause the appellant, David Ayres, was removed as trustee, the assignment ordered to be annulled, and the bond delivered to the appellee, Wells’ administrator. From this decree the appellant, David Áyres, applied for and obtained an appeal to this court.

The question raised by this record is one of fact mainly, and, the evidence appearing to be. contradictory, we have concluded — not without great reluctance — to solve the matter by deferring to the decree of the court below, and affirming the said decree. W e are therefore of opinion that there is no error in the said decree of the circuit court, and the same will be affirmed.
§ 136.109 Removal costs and multiple items of damages. ( a ) A claimant must specify all of the claimant's known removal costs or damages arising out of a single incident when submitting a claim.
( b ) Removal costs and each separate category of damages (as described in subpart C of this part) must be separately listed with a sum certain attributed to each type and category listed.
( c ) At the sole discretion of the Director, NPFC, removal costs and each separate category of damages may be treated separately for settlement purposes.
OMB Control Number 0985-0054

Expiration Date: 02/29/2020

****

**AGENCY COMPONENT DATA**

February 28, 2017

THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 13 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.     

	A-4

*The Agency Component data will be entered directly onto an online form on the NAMRS website. Once entered, the state can update information annually. The reporting period is the federal fiscal year (October–September).*

**Table 1–General Information**

****

**Table 2–Agency Profile**

	A-1

# image1.png
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification by Nick Heyes pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

          Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Inforte Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|              | Inforte Corp. |
|-------------------|---------------|
|              |          |   |
|              |          |   |
|              | By:           | */s/ Nick   Heyes* |
|              |          |  |
| March 28, 2006    |          | Nick Heyes, |
|              |          | Chief Financial Officer |
|              |
| **END OF FILING** |
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5778-5779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Public Availability of the Department of Agriculture FY 2010 
Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Office of Procurement and Property Management, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2010 Service Contract 
inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), Department 
of Agriculture is publishing this notice to advise the public of the 
availability of the FY 2010 Service Contract inventory. This inventory 
provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were 
made in FY 2010. The information is organized by function to show how 
contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The 
inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on

[[Page 5779]]

November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. Department of 
Agriculture has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on 
the Office of Procurement and Property Management homepage at the 
following link: http://www.dm.usda.gov/procurement/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Mrs. Dorothy Lilly in the 
Procurement Policy Division, of OPPM at 202-690-2064 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#64200b160b100c1d4a28051d2400094a111700054a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ecae1fce1fae6f7a0c2eff7ceeae3a0fbfdeaefa0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 25, 2011.
Dorothy Lilly,
Division Chief for Procurement Policy, Departmental, Office of 
Procurement and Property Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-2137 Filed 2-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-96-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 624 

Designating August 2008 as ‘‘National Truancy Prevention Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2008 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. MIKULSKI, 

Mr. KERRY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 31, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

AUGUST 1, 2008 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating August 2008 as ‘‘National Truancy Prevention 

Month’’. 

Whereas public schools in the United States are facing a 

dropout crisis, with approximately 1,200,000 students 

not graduating from high school on time and only 70 percent of students earning high school diplomas; 

Whereas truancy has been shown to be the first and best indicator that a child will drop out of school, use marijuana 

for the first time, and commit juvenile crimes by the age 

of 15; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

SRES 624 ATS 

Whereas the incidence of truancy in a recent national survey 

found that 11 percent of eighth grade students, 16 percent of tenth grade students, and 35 percent of twelfth 

grade students reported skipping 1 or more days of 

school during the previous 30 days; 

Whereas chronic truants often miss more days of school than 

they attend; 

Whereas absentee rates relate directly to graduation rates 

and are highest in public schools in urban areas; 

Whereas truant eighth graders are more likely to say they do 

not believe they will graduate from high school or attend 

college than their peers who attend regularly; 

Whereas truancy has been found to be a risk factor for substance abuse, teen pregnancy, and school dropout; 

Whereas the average annual income for a high school dropout 

in 2005 was $17,299, compared to $26,933 for a high 

school graduate; 

Whereas it has been demonstrated that when truancy is addressed, there is a reduction in the rates of daytime 

crime, juvenile crime, drug use, and delinquency; 

Whereas effective truancy reduction programs can take many 

forms and can be implemented in many different settings, 

including in schools, courts, and through community programs; 

Whereas truancy prevention programs focused on middle 

grade students are key to preventing future dropouts; 

and 

Whereas truancy reduction programs are highly cost effective, 

reduce juvenile and adult crime, and save taxpayer 

money: Now, therefore, be it 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

SRES 624 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates August 2008 as ‘‘National Tru3 ancy Prevention Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the significant harm of chronic 

5 truancy to the youth of the United States; 

6 (3) acknowledges the work being done by tru7 ancy prevention programs throughout the United 

8 States to help at-risk youth; and 

9 (4) encourages law enforcement, school officials, 

10 the judiciary, community leaders, and the business 

11 community to work together to address truancy. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
**Form Approved**

OMB No.: XXXX-XXXX

Expiration Date: XX/XX/2017

**Form Approved**

OMB No.: XXXX-XXXX

Expiration Date: XX/XX/2017

Evaluation of the ACL Title VI Programs

Title VI Tribal Elder Focus Group Moderator Guide

*Public Burden Statement: An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for this project is xxxx-xxxx. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per respondent, per year, including the time to review instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to [title], [address, city, state, zip].*
Exhibit
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
    I, Amy W. Leong, Principal
Financial Officer of TC PipeLines GP, Inc., the general partner of TC PipeLines,
LP (the Partnership), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge,in connection with the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:
  ●
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  ●
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.








Dated:  November
      6, 2009
              /s/
      Amy W. Leong
                Amy
      W. Leong
                Controller
                TC
      PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner of
                TC
      PipeLines, LP (Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER
                                     MERGING
                        SCIENTIFIC FUEL TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
                              A NEVADA CORPORATION,
                                      INTO
                         VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A DELAWARE CORPORATION
      (PURSUANT TO SECTION 78.457 OF THE NEVADA REVISED STATUTES & SECTION
                   253 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATE LAW)

VERTICAL COMPUTER  SYSTEMS,  INC., a Delaware  corporation (the  "Corporation"),
does hereby certify:

      FIRST:  That the  Corporation  is  incorporated  in the State of  Delaware
pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

      SECOND:  That the Corporation  owns all of the outstanding  shares of each
class of the  capital  stock  of  Scientific  Fuel  Technology,  Inc.,  a Nevada
corporation.

      THIRD: That the Corporation,  by the following resolutions of its Board of
Directors, duly adopted on the 26th day of April, 2000, determined to merge into
itself  Scientific  Fuel  Technology,  Inc., on the conditions set forth in such
resolutions:

      RESOLVED:  That  Vertical  Computer  Systems,  Inc.  merge into itself its
wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Scientific Fuel  Technology,  Inc., and assume all of
said subsidiary's liabilities and obligations;

      FURTHER RESOLVED:  That the President and the Secretary of the Corporation
be and they hereby are directed to make,  execute and  acknowledge a certificate
of  ownership  and  merger  setting  forth a copy  of the  resolution  to  merge
Scientific  Fuel  Technology,  Inc.  into this  Corporation  and to  assume  the
subsidiary's  liabilities and obligations on the date of adoption thereof and to
file the same in the offices of the Secretary of States of Delaware and Nevada.

      IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Vertical  Computer  Systems,  Inc.  has  caused its
corporate seal to be affixed and this  certificate to be signed by Richard Wade,
its authorized officer, this 27th day of April, 2000.


                                       VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.


                                       By: /s/Richard Wade
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Richard Wade, President