alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sibling Entertainment Group
Holdings, Inc.(“Registrant”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”),
I, James Cardwell, Chief Financial Officer and chief financial officer, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            This
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period
      covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the
      period covered by this Report.





April 15,
2009




/s/
      James CardwellJames
      CardwellChief
      Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Try THIS

Instead of

THAT!

Use your time, energy, and money 

wisely when marketing your program. 

Proper marketing can reach eligible 

participants who do not yet know about 

your meal program. Think differently 

about how you are telling others about 

all your organization has to offer older 

adults.

Instead of posting an ad in the newspaper,

Reach out to the newspaper and ask 

them to write a feature on what you 

provide for your community. Gather 

testimonials from participants, partners, 

and staff to give them support for a story 

they may be happy to tell on your behalf.

Instead of buying radio ads, 

Create publicity by contacting your local 

mayor or local representatives and inviting 

them to the meal site or to deliver a 

home-delivered meal, and notify the press. 

Your local paper or news station may pick 

up on a story about your meal program, 

especially with local politicians involved.

Instead of putting up a flier, 

Talk with other professionals in your community 

who also work with older adults and tell them 

about all you offer. Consider informing the 

local librarian, hospital social worker or office 

manager, or a barber, so they could refer 

eligible individuals to the Area Agency on Aging 

or meal program.

Instead of sending out information packets to 

doctor’s offices,

Conduct an informational webinar or 

“lunch and learn” for health care and other 

membership groups in your state and local 

community. Groups include Health Care 

Associations, local Economic Development 

Authorities, your Academy of Nutrition and 

Dietetics state affiliate or other dietitian groups.

Instead of waiting for people to come to you,

Focus some time and energy updating your 

organization’s website and/or engaging on 

social media platforms. Those interested 

in your services will likely learn more if your 

organization’s online presence is accurate, 

up-to-date, and interesting.

October 2023

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of 

Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to 

express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Affiliated ComputerServices, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) [Intentionally omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 14, 2003. /s/ Jeffrey A. Rich    Jeffrey A. Rich
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 545 

Honoring the recipients of the El Dorado Promise scholarship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2008 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mrs. LINCOLN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the recipients of the El Dorado Promise 

scholarship. 

Whereas the 2000 United States Census determined that El 

Dorado, Arkansas, had a significantly lower percentage 

of residents with degrees from institutions of higher education and a significantly higher percentage of families 

who fell below the poverty line than the national average; 

Whereas it is increasingly important for students to obtain a 

college education in order to keep up with the demands 

of the modern workforce and global economy; 

Whereas the El Dorado Promise scholarship is a tuition 

scholarship, created and funded by Murphy Oil Corporation, which enables all eligible high school graduates of 

the El Dorado Public School District in El Dorado, ArVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:42 May 02, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR545.ATS SR545

erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 545 ATS 

kansas, to attend any accredited 2- or 4-year, public or 

private, college or university; 

Whereas school enrollment in the El Dorado Public School 

District has significantly increased since the El Dorado 

Promise scholarship program was established, despite a 

15-year trend of decreasing enrollment; 

Whereas the El Dorado Promise scholarship program increased the number of El Dorado High School students 

who chose to attend college after graduation by 20 percent; and 

Whereas, on April 30, 2008, El Dorado High School students 

who receive El Dorado Promise and other academic 

scholarships sign academic letters of intent for the colleges they will be attending upon graduation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the recipients of the El Do3 rado Promise scholarship for choosing to further 

4 their education; 

5 (2) recognizes April 30, 2008, as the second 

6 Academic Signing Day for graduating El Dorado 

7 High School students receiving El Dorado Promise 

8 and other academic scholarships; 

9 (3) acknowledges that the El Dorado Promise 

10 scholarship program is important for the revitaliza11 tion of southern Arkansas; and 

12 (4) recognizes Murphy Oil Corporation for its 

13 efforts to ensure that children from southern ArkanVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:42 May 02, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR545.ATS SR545

erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 545 ATS 

1 sas, who might otherwise struggle in financing a col2 lege education, are able to attend college. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the second quarter of
fiscal year 2007 ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  February 14, 2007
    /s/ John H. RexfordJohn H. Rexford,Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-4417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JULIO ALBERTO JIMENEZ-GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cr-00124-LO-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2020 Decided: February 6, 2020

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geremy C. Kamens, Federal Public Defender, Patrick L. Bryant, OFFICE OF THE 

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Daniel 

Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Julio Alberto Jimenez-Garcia appeals the 18-month sentence imposed by the district 

court following his guilty plea to illegally reentering the United States after deportation or 

removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) (2018). Appellate counsel has filed a brief 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding that there are no 

meritorious grounds for appeal. Counsel questions, however, whether the district court 

imposed a reasonable sentence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. 

“We review a sentence for reasonableness ‘under a deferential abuse-of-discretion 

standard.’” United States v. McCoy, 804 F.3d 349, 351 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Gall v. 

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007)). The district court specifically addressed each of 

Jimenez-Garcia’s nonfrivolous sentencing arguments, as well as the seriousness of his 

criminal history and the need for deterrence. Furthermore, the court did not plainly err in 

imposing a term of supervised release, based on its conclusions that the circumstances of 

the offense merited special deterrence and protection. Although the court’s discussion was 

brief, “the context of its explanation made [its conclusions] patently obvious.” United 

States v. Montes-Pineda, 445 F.3d 375, 381 (4th Cir. 2006); see United States v. Blue, 

877 F.3d 513, 520-21 (4th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we conclude that Jimenez-Garcia’s 

sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have 

found no meritorious grounds for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. 

This court requires that counsel inform Jimenez-Garcia, in writing, of the right to petition 

the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Jimenez-Garcia requests that 
3

a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel 

may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must 

state that a copy thereof was served on Jimenez-Garcia.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2008 ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  November 9, 2007
    /s/ Kevin R, KyserKevin R. Kyser,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  **FAA -**  **2015 -**  **0669** ☐ These comments are in **Directorate ID: 2013**  **- SW**  **- 038**  **- AD**  response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** ☒ FRAN ☐ SNPRM 

### ☒ N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued?

If yes, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. 

### Latest Revision
. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam**  **e issue should be discussed together.** Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend
. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : 

### Choose one . If other, explain : Commenter(s): 

### Click here to enter text. What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Click here to enter text. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Click here to enter text. Do we agree? 

### Yes/No If **YES,** we agree because 

### Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Li st an y changes to the AD If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with 

### In sert text because 

### In sert justification We disagree with 

### Insert text because 

### In sert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List an y changes to the AD If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### In sert our rationale
**ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following : 

### Choose one .

If other, explain : 

### Click here to enter text. Commenter(s): 

### Click here to enter text. What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Click here to enter text. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Click here to enter text. Do we agree? 

### Yes/No

### Page 2 of 3

If **YES,** we agree because 

### Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Li st an y changes to the AD If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with 

### In sert text because 

### In sert justification We disagree with 

### Insert text because 

### In sert justification Make the following changes to the AD: 

### List an y changes to the AD If **NO** , we don’t agree because 

### In sert our rationale
**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Azonic Corporation (the "Registrant") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ John Simmonds
------------------------------
John G. Simmonds
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the Registrant)

Dated: June 29, 2005


/s/ Gary Hokkanen
------------------------------
Gary Hokkanen
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer of the Registrant)

Dated: June 29, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6672
In Re: WAYMARE BILLUPS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Waymare Billups, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Waymare Billups has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking review of his sentences. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Further, mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The relief sought by Billups is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Billups’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350In connection with the Quarterly Report of Akorn, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which thisCertification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does herebycertify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.1350) and Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR240.13a-14(b), that to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 9, 2006       /s/ JEFFREY A. WHITNELL     Jeffrey A. Whitnell    Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.12e Certificate of approval. ( a ) A copy of the certificate of approval for the oil content meters must be carried aboard an oil tanker fitted with such equipment at all times.
( b ) A certificate of type approval must be issued for the specific application for which the oil content meter is approved, that is, for crude oil, “black” products, “white” products, or other products or applications as listed on the certificate.
[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3379, Jan. 16, 2009]