alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACL Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology (PAAT) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2019 Annual Allocation

12/28/2018

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy for 

Assistive 

Technology (PAAT)

Alabama $58,083

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $83,599

Arkansas $50,000

California $471,082

Colorado $66,810

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $250,031

Georgia $124,267

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $152,537

Indiana $79,436

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $53,072

Louisiana $55,814

Maine $50,000

Maryland $72,112

Massachusetts $81,735

Michigan $118,702

Minnesota $66,446

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $72,843

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $107,303

New Mexico $50,000

New York $236,507

North Carolina $122,409

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $138,913

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,000

Pennsylvania $152,579

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $59,866

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $80,021

Texas $337,251

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $100,921

Washington $88,240

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $69,054

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $30,000

Guam $30,000

Northern Mariana Islands $30,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $30,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $30,000

TOTAL $4,749,633
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.503 Tensas River.

The draws of the S15 bridge, mile 27.3 at Clayton, and the S128 bridge, mile 61.0 at New Light, shall open on signal if at least 48 hours notice is given.

[CGD08-04-034, 69 FR 60556, Oct. 12, 2004]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6936

GLENN WAYNE SPENCER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID CHESTER, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-01-157)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Wayne Spencer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 For the purpose of this appeal we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been given to prison officials for mailing. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Wayne Spencer seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motions for reconsideration. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because Spencer’s notice of appeal

was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,

361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

February 19, 2002. Spencer’s notice of appeal was filed on May 20,

2002.* Because Spencer failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                   K-TRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended                       Nine Months Ended    
                                       ----------------------------             ---------------------------
                                       Sept. 28,         Sept. 30,              Sept. 28,         Sept. 30,
                                         1996               1995                  1996              1995   
                                       ---------         ----------             ---------         ---------
<S>                                    <C>               <C>                    <C>              <C>
AVERAGE COMMON AND
 COMMON-EQUIVALENT
 SHARES:

 Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding per Period         3,127,000        3,104,000              3,117,000          3,093,000

Stock Options                              11,000               --                 11,000                 --
                                       ----------        ---------              ---------        -----------

ADJUSTED AVERAGE COMMON
  AND COMMON-EQUIVALENT
  SHARES COMPUTATION                    3,138,000        3,104,000              3,128,000          3,093,000
                                        =========        =========              =========        ===========

EARNINGS FOR COMMON AND
  COMMON-EQUIVALENT
  SHARES COMPUTATION:

     Net income (loss) applicable
     to Common Stock                   $1,161,000         $375,000             $2,841,000        $(9,855,000)
                                       ==========         ========             ==========        =========== 

EARNINGS (loss) PER SHARE:

  Earnings (loss) per Share            $      .37         $    .12             $      .91        $     (3.19)
                                       ==========         ========             ==========        ===========
</TABLE>
#### Tussey, et al. v. Hale, et al.

(Decided October 26, 1915.)

Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.

Ejectment. — In an ejectment suit by one claiming under a patent' granting 1,500 acres and containing an exclusion of 1,000 acres, *410lie must show, in order to recover, that the occupants are in possession of land within the exterior lines and without the exclusion.

C. B. WHEELER for appellants.

SMITH & COMBS and JAMES GOBLE for appellees.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

In March, 1843, a patent was issued to one Jonathan Tussey, granting to -him a certain boundary of land in Floyd County, said to contain 1,500 acres. The boundary was set forth in detail, but recited “there being 1,000 acres of a prior claim in this survey.”

The appellants are the children and heirs-at-law of Jonathan Craig Tussey. They testify that he went by the name of Craig Tussey, but signed his name Jonathan Tussey. They sued in ejectment to recover the land in question, claiming that their father was the patentee, and that he died intestate as the owner of same, and that it descended to them, and that they are now the owners of 'it. After hearing the evidence in their behalf the- court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the defendants and the plaintiffs appeal. The ruling of the court is justified by the record.

It is clear that the patent was issued to Jonathan - Tussey, the grandfather, instead of Jonathan Craig Tussey, the father of appellants. There is nothing in the pleadings or proof to show transfer or descent of the land to Craig Tussey.

While the outside boundary of this survey called for 1,500 acres, yet it recognizes the existence of a prior claim within the boundary amounting to 1,000 acres. Appellants in order to dispossess the appellees must have shown that the appellees were occupying the land within the exterior lines of the Tussey patent and without the exclusion. The proof failed to bring appellants’ case within either of these requirements, and particularly is this true with reference to the exclusions.

We see no merit in appellants’ contention that the words quoted from the patent do not amount to an exclusion. Madison v. Owens, Litt. Sel. Cas., 281; Kirk v. Williams, 82 Ky., 161; Guthrie v. Lewis, 1 Mon., 142; Lemoyne v. Anderson, 123 Ky., 548, 96 S. W., 843.

The judgment is affirmed..
§ 140.7 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subchapter with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG-4), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036, 212-642-4900, *https://www.ansi.org*. ( 1 ) ANSI A10.14-1975, Requirements for Safety Belts, Harnesses, Lanyards, Lifelines, and Drop Lines for Construction and Industrial Use, IBR approved for § 142.42(b).
( 2 ) ANSI/UL 1123-1987, Standard for Marine Buoyant Devices, IBR approved for § 143.405(a).
( 3 ) ANSI Z41-1983, American National Standard for Personal Protection-Protective Footwear, IBR approved for § 142.33(a) and (b).
( 4 ) ANSI Z87.1-1979, Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection, IBR approved for § 142.27(a) and (c).
( 5 ) ANSI Z88.2-1980, Practices for Respiratory Protection, IBR approved for § 142.39(a) through (c).
( 6 ) ANSI Z89.1-1981, Safety Requirements for Industrial Head Protection, IBR approved for § 142.30(a) and (b).
( c ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) IMO Assembly Resolution A.414 (XI), Code for Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, IBR approved for §§ 143.207(c) and 146.205(c).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169, 617-770-3000, *http://www.nfpa.org*. ( 1 ) NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2010 Edition, effective December 5, 2009, IBR approved for § 145.01(b).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48242, July 22, 2016]
**Community Living for All: Celebrating the**

**20th Anniversary of the Olmstead Decision**

**June 25, 2019 • 1:00 pm**

Barbara Jordan Conference Center

Kaiser Family Foundation

**Welcoming Remarks**

*Julie Hocker, Commissioner, Administration on Disabilities, Administration for Community Living (ACL),*

*U.S. Department of Health & Human Services*

**Furthering Disability Civil Rights and Community Integration**

*Roger Severino, Director, Office for Civil Rights, HHS*

**HHS Commitment to Community Living**

*Eric Hargan, Deputy Secretary, HHS*

**Keynote Address: Benefits of Community Living**

*Amy Hewitt, Director, Institute for Community Integration, University of Minnesota—*

*(A Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RRTC) and University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (UCEDD))*

**Implementing Person-Centeredness in Community Living****

*Melissa Harris, Acting Deputy Director, Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group, Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, HHS*

**Panel Discussion**

**Impact of Olmstead: The Past, Present, and New Frontiers**

*Speakers:*

*Kimberly Tissot, CEO/Executive Director of Able SC*

*Kayla McKeon, Manager of Grassroots Advocacy, National Down Syndrome Society*

*Elizabeth Weintraub, Senior Advocacy Specialist, Association of University Centers on Disabilities*

*Damon Briggs, Advocate, Maryland*

**Achieving the Promise: Olmstead Enforcement**

*Eric Dreiband, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice*

**Building an Inclusive Future**

*Lance Robertson, Administrator, Administration for Community Living, HHS*

# image1.tiff

# image2.gif

# image3.jpg
Exhibit 99.1

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Annual Report") of EME
Homer City Generation L.P. (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, based
on his or her knowledge, that:



| |  | /s/GEORGIA NELSONGeorgia Nelson Chief Executive Officer
Mission Energy Westside Inc.,
as General Partner of
EME Homer City Generation L.P.
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith Chief Financial Officer
Mission Energy Westside Inc.,
as General Partner of
EME Homer City Generation L.P.

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EME Homer City Generation L.P. and will be retained by EME Homer City Generation L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or is staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT HUGHES, ESTATE OF BETTY ) 

HUGHES, )

)

Appellant, )

v. ) Case No. 2D15-1329 

)

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., )

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 16, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Gilbert Smith, Jr., Judge.

Robert Hughes, pro se.

Kimberly S. Mello of Greenburg Traurig, 

P.A., of Tampa, and , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, C.J., and BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
§ 107.230 Enforcement. ( a ) *Unauthorized departure or entry, or both.* ( 1 ) Vessels and persons to whom this subpart applies, as described in § 107.210(a)(1), that do not comply with § 107.215(a), or any order issued pursuant to this subpart may be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 for each day of violation.
( 2 ) Vessels and persons to whom § 107.230(a)(1) applies shall be held to a standard of strict liability for any entry into Cuban territorial waters without a permit or for failure to maintain the permit for the vessel on board the vessel as required under this subpart, except that strict liability will not be imposed if the failure to obtain or carry a permit results primarily from an act of war, force majeure, or the negligence of the United States.
( b ) *Knowing failure to comply.* Any person to whom this subpart applies as described in §§ 107.210(a)(2) or (a)(3) who knowingly fails to comply with this subpart or order given under this subpart, or knowingly obstructs or interferes with the exercise of any power conferred by this subpart may be subject to: ( 1 ) Imprisonment for not more than 10 years;
( 2 ) A monetary penalty of not more than $10,000;
( 3 ) Seizure and forfeiture of the vessel; and
( 4 ) A civil penalty of not more than $25,000 for each day of violation.
( c ) *False Statements.* Violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001 may result in imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine, or both.
( d ) *Other enforcement.* The civil penalties provided for in this subpart are separate from and in addition to any enforcement action that any other agency may seek for violations of the statutes and regulations administered by such agencies.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|        |   |   |
|-------------|--------|--------|
| May 4, 2009 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|        |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|        |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|             |        |        |  |  |
#### § 780.509 Agriculture.

The definition of “agriculture,” as contained in section 3(f) of the Act, is discussed in subpart B of this part 780. The principles there discussed should be referred to as guides to the meaning of the terms “agricultural employee” and “growing and harvesting” as used in section 13(a)(14).
89–006

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–1

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 554, RAIL

PASSENGER DISASTER FAMILY ASSISTANCE ACT OF 2001

FEBRUARY 13, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 36]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 36, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 554, the

Rail Passenger Disaster Family Assistance Act of 2001, under an

open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

The rule provides that the bill shall be open for amendment by

section. The rule further allows the chairman of the Committee of

the Whole to accord priority in recognition to those members who

have preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record.

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 482 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 482

 Designating July 26, 2008, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2008

Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Allard, Mr. Craig, Mr. Crapo, 
 Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Inhofe, Mrs. 
Murray, Mr. Reid, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Johnson, 
  Mr. Coburn, Mr. Tester, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Conrad) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                              May 20, 2008

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating July 26, 2008, as ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ``cowboys'', helped establish 
        the American West;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, sound family 
        values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, geographic 
        boundaries, and political affiliations;
Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and its creatures, who 
        lives off of the land and works to protect and enhance the environment;
Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations;
Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the economy through the 
        work of approximately 727,000 ranchers in all 50 of the United States 
        that contribute to the economic well-being of nearly every county in the 
        Nation;
Whereas annual attendance at professional and working ranch rodeo events exceeds 
        27,000,000 fans and rodeo is the 7th most-watched sport in the Nation;
Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that 
        promote and encompass the livelihood of a cowboy span every generation 
        and transcend race and gender;
Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and music and 
        occupies a central place in the public imagination;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and cowgirls to their 
        communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates July 26, 2008, as ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
November 29, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BRUCE ALAN MCMILLIAN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00833

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be certified below for
observan ce.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.233 Broad Creek.

The draws of the Norfolk Southern bridge, mile 8.0, the Poplar Street Bridge, mile 8.2 and the U.S. 13A Bridge, mile 8.25, all in Laurel, need not open for the passage of vessels.

[USCG-2015-1011, 81 FR 33591, May 27, 2016]
§ 147.1104 Platform ELLEN & ELLY safety zone. ( a ) *Description:* The areas within a line 500 meters from each point on the outer edge of each structure. The structures are approximately 120 meters apart. The position of the center of each structure is: Platform Ellen, 33°-34′-57′′ N, 118°-07′-42′′ W; and Platform Elly, 33°-35′-00′′ N, 118°-07′-40′′ W.
( b ) *Regulations:* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel serving either structure,
( 2 ) a vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing, or
( 3 ) a vessel authorized by the Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[CCGD 11-79-02, 47 FR 39679, Sept. 9, 1982; 48 FR 33263, July 21, 1983]