alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Is It a Congregate or Home-Delivered Meal? 

Classifying a service as Congregate (Title IIIC-1) or Home-Delivered (Title IIIC-2) will impact reporting and data collection, as well as 

identifying funding sources for contract and grants. States, Area Agencies on Aging and local service providers may need to review and/or 

update policies and procedures to ensure accurate tracking of consumer participation in provider-arranged interaction described below. 

Refer to your state and local policies for any restrictions that may impact options listed below. 

Provider 

Any licensed food service provider - home-delivered meal provider, traditional congregate 

meal site, pop-up site, restaurant/cafe, grocery or convenience store, food truck. 

Delivery Carry-out, Grab & Go, Drive-thru Served Onsite

Consumed at home without Consumed at home while Consumed onsite with others. congregating. congregating. 

In-person or virtual interaction may 

include one-to-one with a program 

volunteer, or group interaction arranged 

by the nutrition provider, may include 

GoogleMeet, Zoom, FaceTime or similar 

application. 

On-site consumption may be indoors

or outdoors - includes parks, festivals,

events, picnics, tailgate. Leftovers

may be taken offsite.

Home-Delivered Congregate 

Title IIIC-2 Title IIIC-1
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Report on Form 10-QSB of Sona Development Corp.
      (“Registrant”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, James
      Cardwell, Chief Financial Officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            This
                Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the
                period
                covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for
                the
                period covered by this Report.





May
        15,
        2008


/s/
                James CardwellJames
                CardwellChief
                Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
      by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
      the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Attachment A

Supporting Documentation for 

110(l) and 193 Demonstration

Georgia Chapter 391-1-22, 

Georgia’s Clean Fueled Fleet 

Rules
**1995-  agricultural_exports_summary_12.04.95agricultural_exports_summary_08.31.95agricultural_exports_summary_05.31.95agricultural_exports_summary_02.22.95agricultural_exports_12.06.95agricultural_exports_10.26.95agricultural_exports_07.11.95agricultural_exports_02.28.95

**
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SUNIL SINGH

, Appellant,

v.

SHERENE MIRANDER

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3762

[ September 17, 2020 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Peter Holden , Judge; L.T. Case No.

FMCE 18

- 008442

.

Lori Wurtzel of Wurtzel Law PLLC, Winter Park, for appellant.

Linda M. Jaffee of Linda Jaffee PA, Davie, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NO. 12-09-00178-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ERIC WALKER, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Eric Walker, also known as Eric Daniels, was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and placed on community supervision probation (trial court cause number

80782-98). On June 9, 2009, the trial court signed an order revoking Appellant’s community

supervision probation. Appellant subsequently filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court

granted. Because Appellant’s motion for new trial was granted, the appeal is now moot.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion delivered June 30, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

August 28, 2015

John Bennett

Attorney at Law

P. O. Box 19144

Amarillo, TX 79114

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Warren L. Clark

Asst. Criminal District Attorney

Randall County Justice Center

2309 Russell Long Blvd., Suite 120

Canyon, TX 79015

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Numbers: 07-15-00181-CR, 07-15-00182-CR

Trial Court Case Numbers: 18,607-B, 18,608-B

Style: Michael Don Denton v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

Appellant’s brief is filed Thursday, August 27, 2015.

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Eastgate Acquisitions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anna Gluskin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/   ANNAGLUSKIN  Anna Gluskin Chief Executive Officer March 26, 2013    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in New Jersey Industries: A Study of Wages and Hours

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in New Jersey Industries: A Study of Wages and Hours : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 37*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1924,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5358,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Order entered July 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00558-CV

IN RE MICHAEL RAMBERANSINGH, Relator

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-54515-2010

ORDER

In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of mandamus 

is conditionally GRANTED. The Court ORDERS the trial judge, the Honorable Benjamin N. 

Smith, Judge of the 380th Judicial District Court, to VACATE the portion of his March 22, 2013 

Order of Enforcement by Contempt and Suspension of Commitment (Possession or Access) that 

awards real party in interest eighty additional days of possession. 

Should the trial judge fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. The Court 

ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this 

order, a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order.

We ORDER that relator recover his costs of this original proceeding from real party in 

interest.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 34 18

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mo rg an Keeg an & Co m

pa ny, Inc.
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Dav idFle m in g; Davi d F le m in g, as Pers on al Rep res en ta ti ve of t he Est at e o f

Carm el et taFle m in g, Dec eas ed
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Li tt le Ro ck

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 23, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Ju ne 3, 2 01 3 (C orrect edJu ne 5, 2 01 3)

[Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, MELLOY , andBENTON, Circu itJu dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Mo rg an Keeg an & Co m pa ny, In c. (Mo rg an Keeg an ) ap pe al s th e d i s t r ic t
co ur t’s de ni al of i ts m ot io n t o v acat e an arb it rat io n a ward . Aft er care fu l rev ie w o f

1 th e reco rd , s ee Med ic in e Sh op pe In t’l, In c. v. Turn er In v s., In c., 61 4 F.3 d 48 5, 48 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w), an d c o n s id eri ng th e pa rti es ’ subm is si on s on ap pe al , we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co ur t th at Mo rg an Keeg an was no t en ti tl ed to th e rel ie f so ug htforth e rea so ns ex pl ai ne d i n t he co ur t’s op in io n. We con cl ud e as well th at th e di st ric t co ur t ga v e a d e qu at e co ns id erat io n to al l of Mo rg an Keeg an ’s arg um en ts , in cl ud in g it s pu bl ic -p ol ic y arg u men t , whi ch was pr em is ed on Mo rg an Keeg an 's cl ai m th e pa rti es en te red in to a se tt le m en t ag reem en t. The arb it rat io n pa ne l he ard ev id en ce on th e qu es t i o n of whe th er th e pa rti es ha d se tt le d th ei r di sp ut e an d

co nc lu de d th ere was no va li d se tt le m en t ag reem en t. The factua l de te rm in at io n th ere
was no set tl em en t ag reem en t i s n otrev ie wab le un de r th e Fed eral Arbi tra ti on Act.

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Bri an S. Mi ll er, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s. -2

-
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald F. Sullivancertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sibling Entertainment
Group Holdings, Inc., (the Company ) for the period ended ended
December 31, 2011 (the Report ) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: July 5, 2012

By: /s/ Gerald F.
SullivanName: Gerald F. Sullivan Title: Chairman of the Board of
Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
§ 780.301 Other pertinent statutory provisions. ( a ) Man-day is defined by section 3(u) of the Act as follows: “Man-day” means any day during which an employee performs any agriculture labor for not less than 1 hour.
( b ) Under section 3(e) of the Act the term employee does not include certain individuals in determining mandays of labor. Section 3(e) provides that: “Employee” includes any individual employed by an employer, except that such term shall not, for the purposes of section 3(u) include: (1) Any individual employed by an employer engaged in agriculture if such individual is the parent, spouse, child, or other member of the employer's immediate family, or (2) Any individual who is employed by an employer engaged in agriculture if such individual (A) is employed as a hand harvest laborer and is paid on a piece rate basis in an operation which has been, and is customarily and generally recognized as having been, paid on a piece-rate basis in the region of employment, and (B) commutes daily from his permanent residence to the farm on which he is so employed, and (C) has been employed in agriculture less than 13 weeks during the preceding calendar year.
( c ) The legislative history of the 1966 amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act indicates that the Congress in enacting minimum wage protection (section 6(a)(5)) for agriculture workers for the first time sought to provide a minimum wage floor for the farmworkers on large farms or agri-business enterprises. The section 13(a)(6)(A) exemption was intended to exempt those farmworkers on the smaller or familysize farms. In keeping with this intention, a labor requirement of 500 man-days was incorporated into the exemption, and certain workers were specifically excluded from the man-day count, as provided in section 3(e) (1) and (2).
EXHIBIT 31

| |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
| |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nora Coccaro, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Sona Development Corp (Registrant) certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (Report) of Registrant;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2006

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Cocaro, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-930-1430-ET; NEV-042819]


Public Land Order No. 7450; Partial Revocation of Secretarial 
Order dated July 2, 1902; Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes a Secretarial order insofar as it affects 
1,262.05 acres of public lands withdrawn for the Bureau of 
Reclamation's Newlands Project. The lands are no longer needed for 
reclamation purposes, and the revocation is necessary to facilitate a 
pending land exchange. The lands are temporarily closed to surface 
entry and mining due to an overlapping segregation for an exchange 
proposal. The lands have been and will remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis J. Samuelson, BLM Nevada State 
Office, P.O. Box 12000, Reno, Nevada 89520-0006, 775-861-6532.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. The Secretarial Order dated July 2, 1902, which withdrew public 
lands for the Bureau of Reclamation's Newlands Project, is hereby 
revoked insofar as it affects the following described lands:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 20 N., R. 25 E.,
    Sec. 4, lot 5, lots 10 to 16, inclusive, lots 18 to 19, 
inclusive, lots 22 to 25, inclusive, and S\1/2\;
    Sec. 6, lots 8 to 23, inclusive.

    The areas described aggregate 1,262.05 acres in Washoe and Lyon 
Counties.
    2. At 9 a.m. on July 3, 2000, the lands will be opened to the 
operation of the public land laws generally, subject to valid existing 
rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, other segregations of 
record, and the requirements of applicable law. All valid applications 
received at or prior to 9 a.m. on July 3, 2000, shall be considered as 
simultaneously filed at that time. Those received thereafter shall be 
considered in the order of filing.

    Dated: May 22, 2000.
Sylvia V. Baca,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-13864 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
TERRY – ARMY 20080470

**UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS**

Before

GALLUP, TOZZI, and JOHNSON

Appellate Military Judges

**UNITED STATES, Appellee**

**v.**

**Sergeant JEREMY S. TERRY**

**United States Army, Appellant**

ARMY 20080470

Headquarters, Joint Readiness Training Center and Fort Polk

Victor L. Horton, Military Judge

Colonel James D. Key, Staff Judge Advocate

For Appellant:  Major Grace M. Gallagher, JA; Captain Candace N. White Halverson, JA (on brief).

For Appellee:  Pursuant to A.C.C.A Rule 15.2, no response filed.

15 January 2009

-----------------------------------------

SUMMARY DISPOSITION

-----------------------------------------

Per Curiam:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of negligent homicide, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 934 [hereinafter UCMJ].  The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, and reduction to E1.  The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence and attempted to waive the automatic forfeitures.  The promulgating order and action, however, incorrectly stated the effective date and amount of the automatic forfeitures.  

On 22 May 2008, appellant specifically requested deferral and waiver of automatic forfeitures and the adjudged reduction in rank.  On 29 May 2008, the convening authority granted appellant’s request to waive automatic forfeitures, effective 3 June 2008, but declined to grant appellant’s request for deferment of the reduction in rank.  The promulgating order and action incorrectly stated that “[t]he automatic forfeiture of *two-thirds* pay and allowances required by Article 58b, UCMJ is waived effective *28 May 2008* for a period of six months . . .” (emphasis added).  Because appellant was sentenced to six months confinement at a general court-martial, appellant automatically forfeited all his pay and allowances, not merely two-thirds of his pay and allowances as reflected in the promulgating order and action.  *See* Article 58b(a), UCMJ.   Furthermore, the automatic forfeitures went into effect fourteen days after the date on which the sentence was adjudged.  *See* Article 57(a), UCMJ.  In this case, appellant was sentence on 20 May 2008, therefore, the automatic forfeitures went into effect on 3 June 2008, not 28 May 2008.

Although the promulgating order and action are incorrect, appellant concedes he was not prejudiced because the six-month waiver of automatic forfeitures of pay and allowances was correctly applied.  

On consideration of the entire record, the findings of guilty and the sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.

Clerk of Court

PAGE  

2