alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21391]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended 
by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments 
on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, 
for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to 
be used, are being manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be postmarked on or before September 12, 2011. Address 
written comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be 
examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of 
Commerce in Room 3720.
    Docket Number: 11-026. Applicant: Purdue University, 745 
Agriculture Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Instrument: SPSx 
Moisture Sorption Analyzer. Manufacturer: Projekt Messtechnik, Germany. 
Intended Use: The SPSx will be used to monitor the water-solid 
interaction behavior of food ingredients (both amorphous and 
crystalline) and blends of powdered food ingredients. The instrument 
monitors water-solid interactions by taking gravimetric measurement of 
samples continuously using a microbalance to monitor sample weight 
after exposure to the programmed relative humidity and temperature 
conditions. The SPSx is the leading instrument in monitoring multiple 
samples exposed to the same experimental conditions by use of a 
sampling wheel and enclosed top weighing balance, allowing for the 
measurement of up to 23 samples in a single experimental protocol. A 
unique feature of this instrument is that it monitors multiple samples 
at one time, ensuring that conditions do not vary from one experiment 
to the next. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no 
instruments of the same general category being manufactured in the 
United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: March 
23, 2011.

    Dated: August 16, 2011.
Gregory Campbell,
Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-21391 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02827**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02827\02827_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02827\02827_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02827\02827_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02827\02827_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02827\02827_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02827\02827_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02827\Certification Statement Plant ID 02827.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02827\Supporting Documentation\02827_Part A_02827_WB-sheets.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02827\Supporting Documentation\Part A_02827_WM-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.465 Lafourche Bayou. ( a ) The draws of the following bridges shall open on signal; except that, from August 1 through May 31, the draw need not open for the passage of vessels Monday through Friday except Federal holidays from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., unless otherwise indicated: ( 1 ) SR 308 (Golden Meadow) Bridge, mile 23.9, at Golden Meadow
( 2 ) Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8, at Galliano
( 3 ) SR 308 (South Lafourche (Tarpon)) Bridge, mile 30.6, at Galliano, need not open for the passage of vessels from August 1 through May 31, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays from 6:45 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
( 4 ) Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9, at Cutoff
( 5 ) Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3, at Cutoff
( 6 ) LA 657 (Larose) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 38.7, at Larose.
( b ) The draw of the Valentine bridge, mile 44.7 at Valentine, shall open on signal; except that, from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least four hours advance notification is given. During the advance notification period, the draw shall open on less than four hours notice for an emergency and shall open on demand should a temporary surge in water traffic occur.
( c ) The draws of the S3220 bridge, mile 49.2 near Lockport, and the S655 bridge, mile 50.8 at Lockport, shall open on signal; except that, from 6 p.m. to 10 a.m. the draws shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given. During the advance notice period, the draws shall open on less than four hours notice for an emergency and shall open on demand should a temporary surge in waterway traffic occur.
( d ) The draw of the State Route LA 654 bridge, mile 53.2 at Clotilda, shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given. During the advance notice period, the draw shall open on less than four hours notice for an emergency and shall open on demand should a temporary surge in waterway traffic occur.
( e ) The draws of the S3199 bridge, mile 58.2, and the Lafourche Parish bridge, mile 58.7, both at Raceland, shall open on signal if at least six hours notice is given.
( f ) The draw of the S649 bridge, mile 66.6, shall open on signal if at least forty-eight hours notice is given.
( g ) The draws of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge, mile 69.0 at Lafourche, and all bridges upstream of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 117.465, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

          - 50 CFR Part 32 
          - RIN 1018-AF52 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

This document contains corrections to the final regulations which were published Friday, May 12, 2000 (65 FR 30772). The document related to the 1999-2000 refuge-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations. 

# DATES:

This correction is effective May 12, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leslie Marler, (703) 358-2397. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections add certain national wildlife refuges to the list of areas open for hunting and/or sport fishing, along with pertinent refuge-specific regulations for such activities; and amend certain regulations on other refuges that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 1999-2000 season. 

## Need for Correction 

                    As published, an amendatory instruction contains an error which may                           ( print page 36643)                        prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.                 

## Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication on May 12, 2000 of the final regulation, which was the subject of FR Doc. 00-11410, is corrected as follows: 

§ 32.67 

1. On page 30793, in the first column, amendatory instruction 44.e. is corrected to read as follows: 

e. Revising paragraphs A.6. and B.4. of Umatilla National Wildlife Refuge to read as follows: 

Dated: June 1, 2000. 

Leslie A. Marler, 

Division of Refuges, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-14202 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-U
Argued and submitted November 30,

conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing December 23, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RICHARD WILLIAM BOUSKA, *Appellant.*

(90CR-1746; CA A72198)

842 P2d 815

Stephen J. Williams, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*356PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of theft in the first degree. He appeals, challenging only the special conditions of his probation. ORS 138.060; ORS 138.053(l)(c). He was ordered to enroll in an alcohol treatment program, abstain from using intoxicants and voluntarily submit to breath or blood tests when requested by his probation officer.

The state concedes that there was no connection between the consumption of alcohol and commission of the crime. We accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, Brooklyn District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Brooklyn District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Brooklyn, New York.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday June 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Cain at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-3555.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an operational meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday June 28, 2000, 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Internal Revenue 
Service Brooklyn Building located at 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 
11201.
    For more information or to confirm attendance, notification of 
intent to attend the meeting must be made with Eileen Cain. Mrs. Cain 
can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555.
    The public is invited to make oral comments from 8:30 p.m. to 9:00 
p.m. on Wednesday June 28, 2000. Individual comments will be limited to 
5 minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3555, or write Eileen 
Cain, CAP Office, P.O. Box R, Brooklyn, NY, 11201.
    The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues. Note: 
Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could prevent 
effective advance notice.

    Dated: May 25, 2000.
M. Cathy Vanhorn,
Director, CAP, Communications and Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-14008 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.35 Temporary change to a drawbridge operating schedule. ( a ) For any temporary change to the operating schedule of a drawbridge, lasting less than or equal to 180 days, the District Commander may issue a deviation approval letter to the bridge owner and publish a “Notice of temporary deviation from regulations” in the Federal Register.
( b ) If the time period for a temporary change to the operating schedule of a drawbridge will be greater then 180 days, the District Commander will follow appropriate rulemaking procedures and publish a temporary rule in the Federal Register prior to the start of the action.
( c ) *Request for change.* ( 1 ) To temporarily change the drawbridge-operating requirements the bridge owner must submit a written request to the District Commander for approval of the change.
( 2 ) The request must describe the reason for the deviation and the dates and times scheduled for the start and end of the change.
( 3 ) Requests should be submitted as early as possible, preferably 90 days before the start of the action. District Commanders have discretion to accept requests submitted less than 90 days before a needed change if those requests can be processed before the date of the needed change.
( d ) *Determination.* The District Commander's determination to allow the schedule change is normally forwarded to the bridge owner within ten working days after receipt of the request. If the request is denied, the reasons for the denial will be set out in the District Commander's decision letter.
( e ) The drawbridge must return to its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated time period.
( f ) If the authorized deviation period for an event is broken into separate time periods on the same day or on consecutive days, the drawbridge must provide openings for navigation between authorized schedule changes.
( g ) The District Commander will also announce the change to the operating schedule in the Local Notice to Mariners and other appropriate local media.
[USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70308, Dec. 4, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38433, July 7, 2014]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WE INSURE GROUP, INC., A 

FLORIDA CORPORATION, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-81 

LT Case No. 2019-CA-2370

CHRISTOPHER SALAMEH, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed April 25, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Gilbert L. Feltel, Jr., Judge. 

Michael J. Korn, of Korn & Zehmer, 

P.A., Jacksonville, and H. Leon

Holbrook, III, and Adam B.

Edgecombe, of Lippes Mathias, LLP,

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Alison A. Blake and P. Campbell 

Ford, of Ford Miller & Wainer, P.A.,

Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
#### § 405.5 Special reports.

In addition to the report on Form LM-10, the Office of Labor-Management Standards may require from employers subject to the Act the submission of special reports on pertinent information, including but not necessarily confined to reports with respect to specifically identified personnel on the matters referred to in the second paragraph under the instructions for Question 8A of Form LM-10.

[42 FR 59070, Nov. 15, 1977, as amended at 81 FR 16020, Mar. 24, 2016; 83 FR 33842, July 18, 2018]
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,certify that:
1.      I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Affiliated ComputerServices, Inc.;
2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b)      [Intentionally omitted]
(c)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004 /s/ Warren D. Edwards Warren D. Edwards,Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial OfficerAffiliated Computer Services, Inc.
#### Robertson *v.*Commonwealth.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*June 19, 1894.)*

[19 S. E. Rep. 877.]

Bill of Exceptions — Time of Presenting.*

If there is no exception nor bill of exceptions at the time of a ruling, nor during the term, a motion for a bill of exceptions at a ' subsequent term comes too late.

Error to circuit court, Franklin county; S. Gr. Whittle, Judge.

*S. W.*Anderson, for plaintiff in error.

*R. Taylor Scott, Atty.*Gen., for the Commonwealth.

*

See monographic note on “Bills of Exception” appended to Stoneman *v.*Com., 25 Gratt. 887 (Va. Rep. Anno.).

Lacy, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the circuit court of Franklin county, rendered on the 13th of January, 1891, denying a petition for mandamus, prayed for, to compel the county court judge of said county to sign a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was not tendered to the ruling of the county court, sought to be excepted to, at the term at which the ruling was made, but at a subsequent term, — two terms afterwards. The ruling objected to after-wards was not excepted to at the time, nor at the time when *840"it- was made, as stated, and was in substance a motion to allow the defendant, after assignment, and after plea to the merits, two terms afterwards, to withdraw his plea of not guilty, in order to offer a plea in abatement to the form of the grand jury. There is no doubt that if a bill of exceptions be tendered as to the ruling of the court at the trial, and if it fully state the facts (if the truth of the case be fairly stated therein), the judge must sign it, and it must be made a part of the record of the case (Code Ya. § 4055), if the point be reserved at the time ; but if there is no exception at the time, nor bill of exceptions, nor exceptions taken during the term, the exception comes too late at any subsequent term. The bill of exceptions was not tendered here until after the verdict, and the exception not sooner taken. This was too late to seek to reopen the case for a dilatory plea, designed not to affect the trial, which was practically ended, but to raise a question not raised by the record of the trial, for the admitted purpose of raising the question in an appellate court. The petition was demurred to, and the demurrer sustained, and the case brought to this court by writ of error. The circuit court did not err in its judgment. For reasons already stated, the exception and the bill of exceptions came too late. Judgment affirmed.
AIDD Help American Vote Act (PAVA) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2017 Annual Allocation

State/Territory

AIDD Help 

American Vote Act 

(PAVA)

Alabama $70,000

Alaska $70,000

Arizona $70,000

Arkansas $70,000

California $343,009

Colorado $70,000

Connecticut $70,000

Delaware $70,000

District of Columbia $70,000

Florida $177,628

Georgia $89,508

Hawaii $70,000

Idaho $70,000

Illinois $112,686

Indiana $70,000

Iowa $70,000

Kansas $70,000

Kentucky $70,000

Louisiana $70,000

Maine $70,000

Maryland $70,000

Massachusetts $70,000

Michigan $86,947

Minnesota $70,000

Mississippi $70,000

Missouri $70,000

Montana $70,000

Nebraska $70,000

Nevada $70,000

New Hampshire $70,000

New Jersey $78,495

New Mexico $70,000

New York $173,461

North Carolina $88,001

North Dakota $70,000

Ohio $101,763

Oklahoma $70,000

Oregon $70,000

Pennsylvania $112,183

Rhode Island $70,000

South Carolina $70,000

South Dakota $70,000

Tennessee $70,000

Texas $240,699

Utah $70,000

Vermont $70,000

Virginia $73,456

Washington $70,000

West Virginia $70,000

Wisconsin $70,000

Wyoming $70,000

American Samoa $35,000

Guam $35,000

Puerto Rico $70,000

Virgin Islands $35,000

TOTAL $4,582,836

6/7/2017
§ 158.130 Delegations. Each COTP is delegated the authority to— ( a ) Conduct inspections at ports and terminals required to have reception facilities under this part;
( b ) Issue Certificates of Adequacy;
( c ) Grant waivers under § 158.150;
( d ) Designate ports; and
( e ) Deny entry of ships to any port or terminal, except when a ship is entering under force majeure, that does not have— ( 1 ) A Certificate of Adequacy if required under § 158.135; or
( 2 ) Reception facilities for garbage required under subpart D of this part.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18408, Apr. 28, 1989]
###### Editorial Note on Part 157

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 157.130 Crude oil washing with more than one grade of crude oil.

If a tank vessel having a COW system under § 157.10(e), § 157.10a(a)(2), or § 157.10c(b)(2) carries more than one grade of crude oil, the COW system must be capable of washing the cargo tanks with the grades of crude oil that the vessel carries.

[CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11627, Mar. 22, 1985]