alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0001075245
<NAME>                         RIGID AIRSHIP USA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                     1
<CASH>                              0
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              29
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                    20,000
<COMMON>                       28,968
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        0
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    0
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        0
<EPS-BASIC>                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13321]



[[Page 34147]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-836]


Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time 
Limit for Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for preliminary results of 
antidumping duty administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is extending 
the time limit for the preliminary results of a new shipper review of 
glycine from the People's Republic of China (``China''). This review 
covers one Chinese producer, Nantong Dongchang Chemical Industry Corp. 
(``Nantong''), for the period March 1, 1999 through August 31, 1999.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 26, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Dybczak at (202) 482-5811; 
Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Office 9, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 
20230.

The Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') by 
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (``URAA'').

Postponement of Preliminary Results

    The Department has determined that it is not practicable to issue 
its preliminary results of the administrative review within the current 
time limit of June 28, 2000. See Decision Memorandum from Edward C. 
Yang, Office Director to Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary, Enforcement Group III, May 16, 2000. The Department is 
extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results 
until August 28, 2000 in accordance with Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 
the Act.
    The deadline for the final results of this review will continue to 
be 90 days after the signature date of the preliminary results.

    Dated: May 16, 2000.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 00-13321 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.484 Pass Manchac. The draw of the Canadian National/Illinois Central Railroad automated bridge, mile 6.7, at Manchac, operates as follows: ( a ) The draw is not constantly manned and the bridge will normally be maintained in the open position, providing 56 feet vertical clearance above mean high tide to the raised tip of the bascule span for one-half the channel, and unlimited vertical clearance for the other half.
( b ) Railroad track circuits will detect an approaching train and initiate bridge closing warning broadcasts over marine radio and over the Public Address (PA) system six (6) minutes in advance of the train's arrival. Navigation channel warning lights will be lit, and photoelectric (infrared) boat detectors will monitor the waterway beneath the bridge for the presence of vessels. The waterway approaches to the bridge will be monitored by closed circuit TV (CCTV) cameras.
( c ) Activation of the warning broadcasts also activates a marine radio monitor in the Mays Yard (New Orleans switch yard). The yardmaster will continuously monitor marine radio broadcasts on the normal and emergency marine radio channels throughout the warning period and at all times the bridge is closed. The yardmaster will communicate with waterway users via the marine radio, if necessary.
( d ) At the end of warning period, if no vessels have been detected by the boat detectors, and no interruptions have been performed by the yardmaster based on his monitoring of the marine radio and the CCTV, the bridge lowering sequence will automatically proceed.
( e ) Upon passage of the train, the bridge will automatically open. Railroad track circuits will initiate the automatic bridge opening and closing sequences. (Estimated duration that the bridge will remain closed for passage of rail traffic is 10 to 12 minutes.) The bridge will also be manually operable from two locked trackside control locations (key releases) on the approach spans, one on each side of the movable span.
( f ) The yardmaster will be provided with a remote EMERGENCY STOP button which, if pressed, will stop the bridge operation, interrupt the lowering sequence, and immediately return the bridge to the open position. The yardmaster will utilize this control feature in the event a vessel operator issues an urgent radio call to keep the waterway open for immediate passage of the vessel.
[CGD08-93-023, 59 FR 14755, Mar. 30, 1994; 59 FR 23158, May 5, 1994, as amended by USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40056, June 29, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                           2,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,214
<INVENTORY>                                     11,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,296
<PP&E>                                          42,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,431
<BONDS>                                         10,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,019
<SALES>                                         19,840
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,840
<CGS>                                           10,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUAN CARLOS CASTILLO-LOPEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 12-10192

 12-10193

D.C. Nos. 2:12-cr-00072-FJM

 2:07-cr-01409-FJM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2013** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Juan Carlos Castillo-Lopez appeals his

guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and

consecutive 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

FILED

JUN 13 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10192 & 12-10193

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Castillo-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Castillo-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed. 

Castillo-Lopez has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence,

and his right to appeal the revocation of supervised release and the sentence

imposed upon revocation. Our independent review of the record pursuant to

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the

validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.

2009). 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-95 Civil and criminal penalties. ( a ) If a violation of law or regulation carries both a civil and a criminal penalty, the Area, MLC, and District Commanders are authorized to determine whether to institute civil penalty proceedings or to refer the case to the U.S. attorney for prosecution in accordance with § 1.07-90.
( b ) When the U.S. Attorney declines to institute criminal proceedings, the Area, MLC, or District Commander decides whether to initiate civil penalty proceedings or to close the case.
[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33639, June 25, 2001]
#### Gillis *v.*Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company.

Beck, J.

It appeared, from the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto, that the defendant in a suit for damages, brought in the county court of Worth county (the plaintiff in certiorari), filed a plea at the first term of the court; that subsequently the case was duly transfen’ed to the city court of Sylvester, under the provisions of the act. creating that .court, and that the plea was stricken in the city court, upon motion *679of plaintiff’s counsel, on the ground that it was not signed hy defendant’s counsel, though the latter, at the time the motion to strike was made, moved to be allowed to sign the plea in his name as defendant’s attorney at law. It further appeared that the ease had not been marked in default. *Held,*that the petition for certiorari was properly sustained by the superior court. *Currie*v. *Deaver,*1 *Ga. App.*11, and eases there cited.

Submitted July 18, 1906.-

-Decided February 16, 1907.

Certiorari. Before Judge Spence. Worth superior court. November 29, 1905.;-

*G. E. May,*for plaintiff. *Perry & Tipton,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.*
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., Thursday, June 29, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-14035 Filed 5-31-00; 3:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MICHELLE LONG, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 27 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
,NG • G 

th	

^	

^, ^...,(n9

^ 

THE STATEd^ ^ ^^y ^ OF WYOMIN*


N 

MATTHEW H. MEAD 

GOVERNOR

STATE CAPITOL


CHEYENNE, WY 82002 

Office of the Governor 

February 26, 2015 

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Off ce of the Administrator (1101 A) 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Dear Secretary McCarthy, 

I request the Environmental Protection Agency schedule a public meeting in Casper, Wyoming 

on proposed rulemaking for 40 CFR Part 192 Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium 

and Thorium Mill Tailings. I also request the EPA extend the comment period for an additional 

90 days. 

Wyoming is home to the largest supplier of domestic uranium. All of Wyoming's production is 

derived from the in-situ recovery process — the subject of the rule. Proposed action by the EPA 

is of great importance to Wyoming as is EPA's scheduling of a Washington D.C. public meeting. 

However, the EPA office should facilitate a hearing where commercial-scale production takes 

place. A Casper, Wyoming forum is much more realistic for producers, members of the 

workforce and affected public who have relevant information and wish to comment. Testimony 

from those with expertise in the process, those who live near the mining and scientific expertise 

are equally critical to the evaluation of the rule. 

My office has coordinated a review of EPA's advanced notice of proposed rulemaking with our 

relevant State agencies. I would be happy to work with you to set up a public meeting in Casper. 

Please advise me or my Policy Advisor Cameron Nazminia at (307) 777-6472 or 

cameron.nazminia@wyo.gov if you have any questions or if we can assist you. 

Sincerely; 

Matthew H. N1ead 

Governor 

MHM:md 

PHONE: (307) 777-7434	 FAX: (307) 632-3909
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Stereo Vision Entertainment, Inc on
     Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002,  as  filed  with the
     Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
     Herky Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
     to  18  U.S.C.  ss  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Herky Williams
Herky Williams
Chief Financial Officer
October 8, 2002



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual  Report of Stereo Vision  Entertainment,
Inc.  on Form  10-KSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lance
Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/     Lance Robbins
Lance Robbins,
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


October 13, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.240 How does a State or a person intervene in a formal hearing? ( a ) Any person or Adjacent Coastal State may intervene in a formal hearing.
( b ) A person must file a petition of intervention within 10 days of notice that the formal hearing is issued. The petition must: ( 1 ) Be addressed to the *Administrative Law Judge* (ALJ) Docketing Center;
( 2 ) Identify the issues and the petitioner's interest in those issues; and
( 3 ) Designate the name and address of a person who can be served if the petition is granted.
( c ) An adjacent coastal State need only file a notice of intervention with the ALJ Docketing Center.
( d ) The ALJ has the authority to limit the scope and period of intervention during the proceeding.
( e ) If the ALJ denies a petition of intervention, the petitioner may file a notice of appeal with the ALJ Docketing Center within 7 days of the denial. ( 1 ) A brief may be submitted with the notice of appeal.
( 2 ) Parties who wish to file a brief in support of or against the notice of appeal may do so within 7 days of filing the notice.
( f ) The Commandant (CG-5P) will rule on the appeal. The ALJ does not have to delay the proceedings for intervention appeals.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
cutting(!~~(! -~ ' c :~ u 30

helicopters r: ,..., ,. ~=~.:z 1 1916176o-8404 

Flight 

Commercial 

Training, Aircraft 

Operations 

Rentals & --------------------~~~----------------­

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor, RoomW12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

To Whom It May Concern: 

l" • j • } ! .... , .. t~ 

--·· -· \.,;-I_l)-\!~vt\-··-~ www.cehusa.com 

fax 916 641..0969 

In accordance with 14 CFR 11.61-11.10 I, Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC requests an exemption to 

Part120.117, Part 120.225 and Part 91.147 that will allow our Part 91.147 and Part 135 (certificate number 

2GAA968K) drug and alcohol testing programs to be combined under one our Part 135 operation testing 

program. Maintaining separate testing programs for each operation duplicates testing efforts and our 

program costs. Since we only have seven personnel (pilots and mechanics) performing duties in both 

programs, the time spent managing two separate programs and pilot time away from work duties for 

testing, seems unnecessarily redundant. We do not believe that one program to cover both operations 

would adversely affect safety since the single testing program will still test all pilots and mechanics 

involved in both operations. The only difference will be one filing and testing system which will 

eliminate redundant processes, confusion and paperwork. All can be managed by one company official 

instead of two. By lowering our testing costs and man hours spent both managing and testing, we can pass 

along cost savings to our customers without adversely affecting public safety. In addition, eliminating 

redundant paperwork will place less of a burden of record keeping for the FAA. 

Please let me know if you need any further documentation or information to support our request. 

Sincerely, 

Marc McMahan 

General Manager 

Cutting Edge Helicopters, LLC 

3028 Peacekeeper Way 

McClellan, CA 95652