alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Edward B. Cloues, II, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 ofK-Tron International, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 15, 2006 EDWARD B. CLOUES, II         Edward B. Cloues, II    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.330 When may a work vest or deck suit be substituted for a lifejacket? ( a ) A work vest or deck suit meeting the requirements of § 149.326 of this part may be used instead of a lifejacket when personnel are working near or over water.
( b ) Work vests or deck suits may not be substituted for any portion of the number of approved lifejackets required on the deepwater port or attending vessel for use during drills and emergencies.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39179, July 1, 2013]
**Post copy**

**Option 1:**

When you’re looking for tools to help you serve older adults in topics like dietary guidelines, wellness and more, start with us. Download our new Oral Health Guide for Older Adults here: *<link>*

**Option 2:**

Want to help keep your clients’ teeth and gums healthy? Our Oral Health for Older Adults guide has tip after tip that can help! See the guide here: *<link>*

**Option 3:**

It’s important for older adults to visit the dentist at least once a year, regardless if they have teeth or dentures. See our Oral Health for Older Adults guide for more tips: *<link>*

**Option 4:**

Brushing teeth thoroughly with fluoride toothpaste twice a day and flossing once a day 

can help older adults maintain better oral health. See our Oral Health for Older Adults guide for more tips: *<link>*

**Option 5:**

Oranges. Tomatoes. Low-fat milk and more. Foods rich in vitamin C and calcium help improve oral health in older adults. See our Oral Health for Older Adults guide for more tips: *<link>*

**Option 6:**

Did you know 2 in 3 adults ages 65 and older have gum disease? That’s why it’s so important to help them with better oral health habits. See our Oral Health for Older Adults guide for more information: *<link>*

**Option 7:**

Dental procedures shouldn’t be avoided due to the inability to pay. Find financial aid resources to help your clients in our Oral Health for Older Adults guide. *<link>*
### Update and revisions for Open-File Report 98-624, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP) leachate chemistry data for solid mine-waste composite samples from the Silverton and Leadville districts in Colorado

By: Philip L. Hageman**George A. DesboroughPaul J. LamothePeter M. Theodorakos

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr2000150

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        EPA method 1312 (synthetic precipitation leaching procedure); leachate chemistry data for solid mine waste composite samples from Silverton and Leadville, Colorado(1998)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.15 Complaints. ( a ) Enforcement proceedings under the Service Contract Act and under the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act for contracts subject to the Service Contract Act, may be instituted by the Associate Solicitor for Fair Labor Standards or a Regional Solicitor by issuing a complaint and causing the complaint to be served upon the respondent.
( b ) The complaint shall contain a clear and concise factual statement of the grounds for relief and the relief requested.
( c ) The Administrative Law Judge shall notify the parties of the time and place for a hearing.
§ 125.29 Insufficient information. ( a ) ( 1 ) If, in the judgment of the Commandant, an application does not contain sufficient information to enable him to satisfy himself that the character and habits of life of the applicant are such to warrant the belief that his presence on waterfront facilities, and port and harbor areas, including vessels and harbor craft herein, would not be inimical to the security of the United States, the Commandant may require the applicant to furnish, under oath in writing or orally, such further information as he deems pertinent to the standards set forth in § 125.19 and necessary to enable him to make such a determination.
( 2 ) If an applicant fails or refuses to furnish such additional information, the Commandant shall hold in abeyance further consideration of the application, and shall notify the applicant that further action will not be taken unless and until the applicant furnishes such information.
( b ) Upon receipt, the application and such further information as the Commandant may have required shall be referred, except in those instances where action on an application is held in abeyance pursuant to § 125.21(b) or to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, to a committee composed of a representative of the Legal Division, of the Merchant Vessel Personnel Division and of the Intelligence Division, Coast Guard Headquarters. The committee shall prepare an analysis of the available information and shall make recommendations for action by the Commandant.
[CGFR 59-63, 25 FR 1589, Feb. 24, 1960]
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Richard Moreno Ortega, Jr.

, * From the 104 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 16973B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 333

- CR * July 20, 2017

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed.
#### § 780.522 Nonprocessing employees.

Only those employees who actually engaged in the growing and harvesting of shade-grown tobacco and the specified exempt processing activities are exempt. Clerical, maintenance and custodial workers are not included.
#### § 136.7 Foreign claimants.

In addition to other applicable limitations on presenting claims to the Fund, claims by foreign claimants to recover removal costs or damages may be presented only when the requirements of section 1007 of the Act (33 U.S.C. 2707) are met.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter of
fiscal year 2006 ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 15, 2006
    /s/ Mark A. KingMark A. KingPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.
| | 
| | 

| | Exhibit
21.1   Companies Subsidiaires
| | -------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

| | 
| | 

| | 
| | 

| | SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE COMPANY *
| | -----------------------------

|Name of Subsidiary                      | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
of Organization
|--------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|4Kids Entertainment Licensing, Inc.     | New York                                     
|4Kids Productions, Inc.                 | New York                                     
|4Kids Ad Sales, Inc.                    | Delaware                                     
|The Summit Group, Inc.                  | New York                                     
|4Kids Entertainment Music, Inc.         | Delaware                                     
|4Kids Entertainment Technology, Inc.    | Delaware                                     
|4Kids Entertainment Home Video, Inc.    | Delaware                                     
|World Martial Arts Productions, Inc.    | New York                                     
|Websites 4Kids, Inc.                    | Delaware                                     
|Leisure Concepts International, Inc.    | New York                                     
|4Kids Entertainment International, Ltd. | United Kingdom                               

| | *
100% Owned Subsidiary
| | -----------------------
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10771 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. DARWYN DEMOND LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-351-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointe d t o represent D arwyn Demond Lewis has moved for leave t o withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v. Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 ( 5th Cir. 2 011). Lewis has filed a r e sponse. We have reviewed co u n s e l ’ s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lewis’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment t hat t he app e a l p r e s e nts no nonfrivolous issue for a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s m otion for leave U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D February 19, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-10771 Document: 00512146473 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013No. 12-10771

to withdr a w i s GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. S ee 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. Lewis’s motion to relieve counsel and appoint substitute counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 12-10771 Document: 00512146473 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013
§ 779.385 May qualify as exempt establishments. An amusement or recreational establishment operating on a seasonal basis may qualify as an exempt establishment under section 13(a)(3) of the Act, added by the 1966 amendments, even if it does not meet all the requirements of the 13(a)(2) exemption. Section 13(a)(3) exempts from the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements of the Act “any employee employed by an establishment which is an amusement or recreational establishment, if (a) it does not operate for more than seven months in any calendar year or (b) during the preceding calendar year, its average receipts for any 6 months of the year were not more than 331 ⁄ 3 percentum of its average receipts for the other 6 months of such year”. “Amusement or recreational establishments” as used in section 13(a)(3) are establishments frequented by the public for its amusement or recreation and which are open for 7 months or less a year or which meet the seasonal receipts test provided in clause (B) of the exemption. Typical examples of such are the concessionaires at amusement parks and beaches. (S. Rept. 145, 87th Cong., first session, p. 28; H. Rept. 75, 87th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 10.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobility Electronics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Charles
R. Mollo , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Charles R. Mollo
---------------------------------------


Charles R. Mollo
---------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SUNIL SINGH,

Appellant,

v.

SHERENE MIRANDER,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3762

[September 17, 2020]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

FMCE 18-008442.

Lori Wurtzel of Wurtzel Law PLLC, Winter Park, for appellant.

Linda M. Jaffee of Linda Jaffee PA, Davie, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Artemis International Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert S.Stefanovich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Robert S. Stefanovich |
|---------------------------|
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| April 11, 2003       |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ArtemisInternational Solutions Corporation and will be retained by ArtemisInternational Solutions Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 149

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 149.1 What does this part do?

This part provides requirements for the design and construction of deepwater ports. It also provides the requirements for equipment for deepwater ports.
**EXHIBIT 24**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

Eachperson whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Kit M. Cole or MichaelMoulton, and either of them as attorney-in-fact to sign in his or her behalf,individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file this AnnualReport  on Form 10-KSB of EpicBancorp and all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
|                        | **Signature** | ** **                          | ** ** | ** **          | **Title** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Date** | ** ** |
|------------------------|---------------|-------------------------------------|------------|---------------------|-----------|------------|------------|------------|----------|------------|
| /s/  KIT M. COLE       |          | Chief Executive Officer,            |       | March 30, 2005 |
| Kit M. Cole            |          | Chairman of the Board, and Director |       |                |
|                   |          | (Principal Executive Officer)       |       |                |
| /s/  CAROLYN HORAN     |          |                                |       |                |
| Carolyn Horan          |          | Director                            |       | March 30, 2005 |
| /s/  RICHARD E. SMITH  |          |                                |       |                |
| Richard E. Smith       |          | Director                            |       | March 30, 2005 |
| /s/  W. JEFFERY TAPPAN |          |                                |       |                |
| W. Jeffery Tappan      |          | Director                            |       | March 30, 2005 |
| /s/  ALLAN BORTEL      |          |                                |       |                |
| Allan Bortel           |          | Director                            |       | March 30, 2005 |
| /s/  ROBERT HELLER     |          |                                |       |                |
| Robert Heller          |          | Director                            |       | March 30, 2005 |
| /s/  MICHAEL MOULTON   |          | Chief Financial Officer             |       |                |
| Michael Moulton        |          | (Principal Financial Officer)       |       | March 30, 2005 |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**VANTAGEMED CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of VantageMed Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve Curd, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ STEVE CURD          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Steve Curd              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| April 2, 2007      |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
§ 110.222 Pacific Ocean at Santa Barbara Island, Calif. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds.* Shoreward of a line beginning at the Santa Barbara Island Light on the northeast end of the island and bearing 23° true a distance of 1.515 nautical miles seaward from the beach; thence 140°30′ true, 2.54 nautical miles; thence 212°30′ true, 2.30 nautical miles; thence 296°30′ true, 0.96 nautical mile; and thence 325° true to the beach.
( b ) *The regulations.* The anchorage shall be available for anchorage of all types of craft. Temporary floats or buoys for marking anchors in place will be permitted in this area.
#### Jose Mundo et al., Appellants, v SMS Hasenclever Maschinenfabrik, Respondent, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted July 8, 1996;

decided September 19, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 14, 1996 Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion for reargument or, alternatively, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and from so much of the Appellate Division’s February 27, 1996 order as affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that the May 14, 1996 order and the above-stated portion of the February 27, 1996 order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7223
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MAYSO LAWRENCE, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-89-391-JFM, CA-96-1336-HNM) Submitted: July 15, 1997 Decided: July 30, 1997 Before HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mayso Lawrence, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Vincent Geise, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lawrence , Nos. CR-89-391-JFM; CA-96-1336- HNM (D. Md. June 28, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED