alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 118.60 Characteristics of lights.

All lights required or authorized under this part must be securely attached to the structure and of sufficient candlepower as to be visible against the background lighting at a distance of at least 2,000 yards 90 percent of the nights of the year. Lights must meet the requirements of this part. Lights shall be fixed lights excepting as provided in §§ 118.95. 118.110 and 118.150 of this part. Color specifications are not prescribed for bridge lights, however, the chromaticity standards for navigation lights in 33 CFR Part 84—Annex I are recommended.

[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16313, May 2, 1986, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35530, June 30, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 680 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 680

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 24 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation 
        into how financial institutions have designed, marketed, and implemented 
        transactions intended to enable foreign taxpayers to avoid taxes on U.S. 
        stock dividends;
Whereas, the Subcommittee has received requests from law enforcement and 
        regulatory agencies for access to records of the Subcommittee's 
        investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to law enforcement officials, regulatory agencies, and other 
entities or individuals duly authorized by federal, state, or foreign 
governments, records of the Subcommittee's investigation into how 
financial institutions have designed, marketed, and implemented 
transactions intended to enable foreign taxpayers to avoid taxes on 
U.S. stock dividends.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

p1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145655

KIM L. VICTOR,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 145655

COA: 308891

Roscommon CC: 00

- 000000

ROSCOMMON COUNTY JUDGE,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 28, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Original

No. 7221

#### Ronald Moses v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

November 28, 1975

*Ronald Moses,*pro se, by brief, for the plaintiff.

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *James L. Kruse,*attorney, by brief, for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

The only issue before us is whether the Trial Court *(Batch-elder,*J.) abused its discretion in denying on May 21, 1975, the plaintiff’s motions for bail filed on May 13, 1975, and May 21, 1975.

It appears that the plaintiff was convicted in the superior court of aggravated assault on October 23, 1974, and sentenced to the State prison. He took no appeal but filed a habeas corpus petition on December 23, 1974, which petition was pending when the motions for bail were denied.

It is established that the question of bail is discretionary with the court. *State v. Booton,*114 N.H. 152, 317 A.2d 18 (1974). The court’s action will not be disturbed except on evidence of a compelling nature. *See State v. Hutton,*107 N.H. 426, 428, 223 A.2d 416, 417 (1966).

The record before us discloses no evidence sufficient to warrant reversal of the trial court’s rulings.

*Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled.*
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 403 

Congratulating Boys Town on its 90th anniversary celebration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2007 

Mr. HAGEL (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Boys Town on its 90th anniversary 

celebration. 

Whereas on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, Boys Town 

celebrates the 90th anniversary of the date Father Flanagan founded Boys Town to serve hurting children and 

their families; 

Whereas Father Flanagan’s legacy, Boys Town, is a beacon 

of hope to thousands of young people across the Nation; 

Whereas in 2006 nearly 450,000 children and families found 

help through the Boys Town National Hotline, including 

34,000 calls from youth where hotline staff intervened to 

save a life or provide therapeutic counseling, and nearly 

1,000,000 more children were assisted through outreach 

and training programs; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 403 ATS 

Whereas Boys Town continues to find new ways to bring 

healing and hope to more children and families; 

Whereas new programs at Boys Town seek to increase the 

number of children assisted and bring resources and expertise to bear on the problems facing our Nation’s children; and 

Whereas Boys Town’s mission is to change the way America 

cares for children and families by providing and promoting a continuum of care that strengthens them in 

mind, body, and spirit: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses its heartfelt congratulations to the 

3 Boys Town family on the historic occasion of its 

4 90th anniversary; and 

5 (2) extends its thanks to the extraordinary 

6 Boys Town community for its important work with 

7 our Nation’s children and families. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### § 146.203 Requirements for U.S. and undocumented MODUs.

Each mobile offshore drilling unit documented under the laws of the United States and each mobile offshore drilling unit that is not documented under the laws of any nation must comply with the operating standards of 46 CFR part 109 when engaged in OCS activities.
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.400 Enforcement. ( a ) The rules and regulations in this subchapter are enforced by the COTP under the supervision and general direction of the District Commander, Area Commander, and the Commandant. All authority and power vested in the COTP by the rules and regulations in this subchapter is also vested in, and may be exercised by, the District Commander, Area Commander, and the Commandant.
( b ) The COTP, District Commander, Area Commander, or Commandant may assign the enforcement authority described in paragraph (a) of this section to any other officer or petty officer of the Coast Guard or other designees authorized by the Commandant.
( c ) The provisions in this subchapter do not limit the powers conferred upon Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officers by any other law or regulation, including but not limited to 33 CFR parts 6, 160, and 165.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7443

JOHN D. STRASSINI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

2 UNNAMED CAPTAINS; SEVERAL SERGEANTS;

D.A.R.T.; DETENTION OFFICERS, of Mecklenburg

County Sheriff’s Department, Jail Division;

CAPTAIN COLLINGS; CAPTAIN THOMAS, C. H.

HARRISON, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CA-00-238-3)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Strassini, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Douglas MacLatchie,

WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John D. Strassini appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Strassini v. Two

Unnamed Captains, No. CA-00-238-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C ■ In • J IN I. al IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AF 06-0263 IN THE MA1 IER OF AN APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMISSION ON COURTS OF LIMITED JURISDICTION 

### , DEC 2 0 2(122 Bovv •n C. urt 0 R D ER ". On December 31, 2022, the Honorable Heidi J. Ulbricht will resign her position as the District Court Judge member ofthe Commission on Courts ofLimited Jurisdiction. The Court thanks Judge Ulbricht for her service to the Commission, the Court, and the people ofMontana. The Honorable David Grubich has expressed interest in an appointment as a member ofthe Commission. Therefore, with the consent ofthe appointee, IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable David Grubich is appointed as the District CourtJudgemember ofthe Commission on CourtsofLimitedJurisdictionto aterm offour years, expiring on December 31, 2026. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the Honorable Heidi J. Ulbricht, the Honorable David Grubich, each member of the Commission on Courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Judicial Educator Shauna Ryan, and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this c-4..) day ofDecember, 2022. ChiefJustice 12/21/2022
Case Number: AF 06-0263Justices

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Epixtar Corp. ("Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004 ("Report"), the undersigned certifies that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date:    April 15, 2005

By:  /s/ Irving Greenman, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**ACL Organizational Chart – Text Version**

The U.S. Administration for Community Living (ACL) is led by the Administrator, who also serves as the Assistant Secretary for Aging. The Administrator is directly supported by the Principal Deputy Administrator, and the Chief of Staff.  The following report to the Office of the Administrator:

· Administration on Aging, which includes four offices:

· Office of Supportive and Caregiver Services

· Office of Nutrition and Health Promotion Programs

· Office of Elder Justice and Adult Protective Services

· Office of American Indian, Alaskan Native and Native Hawaiian Programs

· Administration on Disabilities, which includes three offices:

· Office of Intellectual and Developmental Disability Programs

· Office of Independent Living Programs

· Office of Disability Services Innovations

· Center for Innovation and Partnership, which includes three offices:

· Office of Interagency Innovation

· Office of Network Advancement

· Office of Healthcare Information and Counseling

· Center for Management and Budget, which includes four offices:

· Office of Budget and Finance

· Office of Grants Management

· Office of Administration and Personnel

· Office of Information Resources Management

· Center for Policy and Evaluation, which includes two offices:

· Office of Policy Analysis and Development

· Office of Performance and Evaluation

· Center for Regional Operations, which includes ten regional offices

· National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, which includes two offices:

· Office of Research Administration

· Office of Research Sciences

· Office of External Affairs

The Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging also serves as the Director of the Office of Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs, consistent with Section 201 of the Older Americans Act.

The Administration on Disabilities is headed by a Commissioner who also serves as:

· Commissioner of the Administration on Developmental Disabilities, as described by the Developmental Disabilities Act 

· Director of the Independent Living Administration, reporting directly to the ACL Administrator in carrying out those functions, consistent with Section 701A of the Rehabilitation Act.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.25-48 Oceanographic research. ( a ) Each person allowed by the Coast Guard to join a Coast Guard voyage for the purpose of oceanographic research is charged the cost of each meal that he consumes while on board the Coast Guard vessel.
( b ) The person, company, association, or government agency engaging a Coast Guard vessel for an oceanographic research study is charged the daily cost of operating the vessel.
(Title V, 65 Stat. 268, 290; sec. 6(b)(1), 80 Stat. 937; 31 U.S.C. 483a; 49 U.S.C. 1655(b)(1); 49 CFR 1.46(b))
[CGD 72-62R, 37 FR 20167, Sept. 27, 1972]
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.611 What head protection is required?

The deepwater port operator must ensure that where there is a reasonable probability of injury from falling objects or contact with electrical conductors, personnel working or visiting such an area wear head protectors designed to protect them against such injury and complying with 29 CFR 1910.135.
### Pumping tests in the Los Alamos Canyon well field near Los Alamos, New Mexico

By: C.V. TheisC.S. Conover

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619I

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 116
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 116 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35012, June 19, 2008 and USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 49410, Aug. 13, 2010.

§ 116.15 Preliminary investigation. ( a ) During the Preliminary Investigation, the District Commander will prepare a written report containing all pertinent information and submit the report, together with a recommendation for or against the necessity of a Detailed Investigation, to the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs.
( b ) The Preliminary Investigation Report will include a description of the nature and extent of the obstruction, the alterations to the bridge believed necessary to meet the reasonable needs of existing and future navigation, the type and volume of waterway traffic, and a calculation of the benefits to navigation which would result from the proposed bridge alterations.
( c ) The Chief, Office of Bridge Programs will review the Preliminary Investigation Report and make a Preliminary Decision whether or not to undertake a Detailed Investigation and a Public Meeting.
( d ) If after reviewing the Preliminary Investigation Report, the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs decides that further investigation is not warranted, the complainant will be notified of the decision. This notification will include a brief summary of information on which the decision was based and details of the appeal process described in § 116.55.
[CGD 91-063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, 1996; USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37314, June 21, 2012; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38433, July 7, 2014]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sibling Entertainment Group
Holdings, Inc.(“Registrant”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”),
I, Mitchell Maxwell, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            This
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period
      covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the
      period covered by this Report.





April 15,
2009




/s/
      Mitchell MaxwellMitchell
      MaxwellChief
      Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Attention: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Compressor White Paper

Please find the attached comments in response to the Oil and Natural Gas Sector Compressor White Paper, on 

behalf of the Gas Compressor Association (GCA). 

Thanks,

Erin

Erin Badough, PE

Environmental Manager, Air Quality Programs 

Exterran Energy Solutions L.P.

281­836­7514 (office)

Badough, Erin L. <Erin.Badough@Exterran.com>

Mon 6/16/2014 1:16 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

Cc:Alan Moore (alanm@nacmsw.com) <alanm@nacmsw.com>; 

 1 attachment

gca white ppr001.pdf; 

Attention: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Compressor Wh... - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/26/2014
§ 801.5 Effect on other laws or agreements. ( a ) Section 10 of EPPA provides that the Act, except for subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 7, does not preempt any provision of a State or local law, or any provision of a collective bargaining agreement, that prohibits lie detector tests or is more restrictive with respect to the use of lie detector tests.
( b ) ( 1 ) This provision applies to all aspects of the use of lie detector tests, including procedural safeguards, the use of test results, the rights and remedies provided examinees, and the rights, remedies, and responsibilities of examiners and employers.
( 2 ) For example, if the State prohibits the use of polygraphs in all private employment, polygraph examinations could not be conducted pursuant to the limited exemptions provided in section 7 (d), (e) or (f) of the Act; a collective bargaining agreement that provides greater protection to an examinee would apply in addition to the protection provided in the Act; or more stringent licensing or bonding requirements in a State law would apply in addition to the Federal bonding requirement.
( 3 ) On the other hand, industry exemptions and applicable restrictions thereon, provided in EPPA, would preempt less restrictive exemptions established by State law for the same industry, e.g., random testing of current employees in the drug industry not prohibited by State law but limited by this Act to tests administered in connection with ongoing investigations.
( c ) EPPA does not impede the ability of State and local governments to enforce existing statutes or to enact subsequent legislation restricting the use of lie detectors with respect to public employees.
( d ) Nothing in section 10 of the Act restricts or prohibits the Federal Government from administering polygraph tests to its own employees or to experts, consultants, or employees of contractors, as provided in subsections 7(b) and 7(c) of the Act, and § 801.11 of this part.