alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Vincent G. Easi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/  Vincent G. Easi     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
|                     |
| Vincent  G. Easi         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| March  28, 2006          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-30620) pertaining to the Inforte Corp. Amended and
Restated 1997 Compensation Plan and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-30624) pertaining to the Inforte Corp. Amended and
Restated Employees Stock Purchase Plan, of our report dated January 21, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Inforte
Corp. as of December 31, 2002 and for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2002 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

|                    | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP | 
|------------------- | --------------------- | 
|                    |                      
|Chicago,
  Illinois |                      
|March 24,
  2004    |                      

68

---

---
§ 140.30 Judicial review. ( a ) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent any interested party from seeking judicial review as authorized by law.
( b ) Judicial review of the regulations in this subchapter, or any final ruling or order of the Commandant or that person's delegate pursuant to the Act or the regulations in this subchapter, is governed by the judicial review provisions of section 23 of the Act (43 U.S.C. 1349).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-6956 LEROY BOONE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-149-N, CA-96-372-2) Submitted: February 10, 1998 Decided: February 25, 1998 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELLeroy Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Albert David Alberi, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Leroy Boone appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.§ 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). The district court found that before Boone could file a su ccessive § 2255 motion, he must obtain authorization from this court to do so. Because we find that authorization is not required, we vacate and remand. Boone filed a su ccessive § 2255 motion on April 8, 1996, raising six claims. He then filed an addendum on April 25, 1996, contendingthat his conviction for using and carrying a firearm should be overturned in light of Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137 (1995). Boone filed his § 2255 motion before April 24, 1996 (the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 ("AEDPA")). Moreover, the envelope in which Boone mailed the addendum bears a postmark of April 23, 1996. Under Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the addendum is deemed filed when Boone handed it to prison officials for mailing-- before the AEDPA's effective date. See Burns v. Morton , ___ F.3d ___, ___, 1998 WL 15128, at *4 (3d Cir. 1998). B ecause authorization from this court is not required, see Breard v. Pruett , ___ F.3d___, ___, 1998 WL 19920, at *2 (4th Cir. 1998) (holding that preAEDPA law applies if habeas corpus proceeding filed before AEDPA's effective date) (citing Howard v. Moore , 131 F.3d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 1997) (en banc)), we v acate the district court's order and remand for further proceedings.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
<PAGE>

                         [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP]

                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

To the Partners of Litton Loan Servicing LP:

We have examined managements assertion about Litton Loan Servicing LPs
(the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2001, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assertion about the Companys compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination of the Companys
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
---------------------------
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
January 18, 2002
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 Section
        906 Certification
 
 The
        following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form
        10-Q of
        the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18
        U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The
        undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
        (15
        U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        the MLM Index Fund.
 
 
 May
        1,
        2007
 
 /s/
        James A. Mehling
 Vice
        President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Mount
        Lucas Management Corporation,
 the
        manager of the MLM Index Fund
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ James D. Shelton

James D. Shelton 

Chief Executive Officer 

August 12, 2003 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

July 30, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC Exemption Request Under 

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC an operator of 

Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography

and videography, seeks exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Inspire within the National Airspace 

System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, aerial photography and videography of exterior 

building inspections, Real Estate Properties (for homeowners, realtors, home builders, 

home contractors and / or home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspection of 

home exteriors), aerial surveying and mapping, precision agriculture, and filming of 

special events over certain areas of the United States, conducted within and under the 

conditions outlined herein, or as may be established by the FAA, as required by Section 

333 requirements. 

Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC has requested that the FAA not request public comment on 

its petition because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is 

identical to numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC will be utilizing the same DJI Inspire proven 

technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in numerous previously 

approved exemptions. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany Cleveland 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

Aerial Media, LLC’s Section 333 Petition is included. Combined, their comprehensive 

Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to their chosen 

products and the technology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a 

Summary Grant of Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC’s Section 333 Petition and expedite the 

process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
#### § 103.510 Area Maritime Security (AMS) Plan review and approval.

Each AMS Plan will be submitted to the cognizant District Commander for review and then forwarded to the Area Commander for approval.
#### § 780.111 “Dairying” as a farming operation.

“Dairying” includes the work of caring for and milking cows or goats. It also includes putting the milk in containers, cooling it, and storing it where done on the farm. The handling of milk and cream at receiving stations is not included. Such operations as separating cream from milk, bottling milk and cream, or making butter and cheese may be considered as “dairying” under some circumstances, or they may be considered practices under the “secondary” meaning of the definition when performed by a farmer or on a farm, if they are not performed on milk produced by other farmers or produced on other farms. (See the discussions in §§ 780.128 *et seq.*)
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.107 What additional information may be required? ( a ) The Commandant (CG-5P), in coordination with MARAD, may require the applicant or the applicant's affiliates to file, as a supplement to the application, any analysis, explanation, or other information the Commandant (CG-5P) deems necessary.
( b ) The Commandant (CG-5P) may require the applicant or the applicant's affiliates to make available for Coast Guard examination, under oath or for interview, persons having, or believed to have, necessary information.
( c ) The Commandant (CG-5P) may set a deadline for receiving the information. ( 1 ) If the applicant states that the required information is not yet available but will be at a later date, the Commandant (CG-5P) may specify a later deadline.
( 2 ) If a requirement is not met by a deadline fixed under this paragraph, the Commandant (CG-5P), in coordination with MARAD, may determine whether compliance with the requirement is important to processing the application within the time prescribed by the Act.
( 3 ) If the requirement is important to processing the application within the time limit set by the Act, the Commandant (CG-5P) may recommend to the Maritime Administrator that he or she either not approve the application or suspend it indefinitely. The deadline for the Administrator's review under the Act is extended for a period of time equal to the time of the suspension.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013]
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 171/1 lu

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | C 171 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 47o anno1 luglio 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

C 171

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

47o anno1 luglio 2004

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Comunicazioni |
| | Commissione |
| 2004/C 171/1 | Tassi di cambio dell'euro | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

I   Comunicazioni

Commissione

2004/C 171/1

Tassi di cambio dell'euro

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

I Comunicazioni

Commissione

| 1.7.2004 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2004

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

C 171/1

---

Tassi di cambio dell'euro (1)

30 giugno 2004

(2004/C 171/01)

1 euro=

| | Moneta | Tasso di cambio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dollari USA | 1,2155 |
| JPY | yen giapponesi | 132,40 |
| DKK | corone danesi | 7,4326 |
| GBP | sterline inglesi | 0,67075 |
| SEK | corone svedesi | 9,1451 |
| CHF | franchi svizzeri | 1,5242 |
| ISK | corone islandesi | 88,33 |
| NOK | corone norvegesi | 8,4365 |
| BGN | lev bulgari | 1,9559 |
| CYP | sterline cipriote | 0,58150 |
| CZK | corone ceche | 31,755 |
| EEK | corone estoni | 15,6466 |
| HUF | fiorini ungheresi | 251,60 |
| LTL | litas lituani | 3,4529 |
| LVL | lats lettoni | 0,6570 |
| MTL | lire maltesi | 0,4263 |
| PLN | zloty polacchi | 4,5236 |
| ROL | leu rumeni | 40 626 |
| SIT | tolar sloveni | 239,9900 |
| SKK | corone slovacche | 39,875 |
| TRL | lire turche | 1 805 300 |
| AUD | dollari australiani | 1,7554 |
| CAD | dollari canadesi | 1,6343 |
| HKD | dollari di Hong Kong | 9,4803 |
| NZD | dollari neozelandesi | 1,9210 |
| SGD | dollari di Singapore | 2,0901 |
| KRW | won sudcoreani | 1 404,45 |
| ZAR | rand sudafricani | 7,6177 |

Moneta

Tasso di cambio

USD

dollari USA

1,2155

JPY

yen giapponesi

132,40

DKK

corone danesi

7,4326

GBP

sterline inglesi

0,67075

SEK

corone svedesi

9,1451

CHF

franchi svizzeri

1,5242

ISK

corone islandesi

88,33

NOK

corone norvegesi

8,4365

BGN

lev bulgari

1,9559

CYP

sterline cipriote

0,58150

CZK

corone ceche

31,755

EEK

corone estoni

15,6466

HUF

fiorini ungheresi

251,60

LTL

litas lituani

3,4529

LVL

lats lettoni

0,6570

MTL

lire maltesi

0,4263

PLN

zloty polacchi

4,5236

ROL

leu rumeni

40 626

SIT

tolar sloveni

239,9900

SKK

corone slovacche

39,875

TRL

lire turche

1 805 300

AUD

dollari australiani

1,7554

CAD

dollari canadesi

1,6343

HKD

dollari di Hong Kong

9,4803

NZD

dollari neozelandesi

1,9210

SGD

dollari di Singapore

2,0901

KRW

won sudcoreani

1 404,45

ZAR

rand sudafricani

7,6177

---

(1)

Fonte: tassi di cambio di riferimento pubblicati dalla Banca centrale europea.

---
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.478 Lower Grand River. ( a ) The draw of the LA 75 bridge, mile 38.4 (Alternate Route) at Bayou Sorrel, shall open on signal; except that from about August 15 to about June 5 (the school year), the draw need not be opened from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday except holidays. The draw shall open on signal at any time for an emergency aboard a vessel.
( b ) The draw of the LA 77 bridge, mile 47.0 (Alternate Route) at Grosse Tete, shall open on signal; except that, from about August 15 to about June 5 (the school year), the draw need not be opened from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. and from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday except Federal holidays. The draw shall open on signal at any time for an emergency aboard a vessel.
( c ) The draw of the S997 bridge, mile 41.5 (Landside Route) at Pigeon, shall open on signal; except that, from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given. During the advanced notice period, the draw shall open on less than four hours notice for an emergency and shall open on demand should a temporary surge in waterway traffic occur.
[CGD8-92-16, 57 FR 57962, Dec. 8, 1992, as amended by CGD08-93-024, 59 FR 14756, Mar. 30, 1994; CGD08-96-003, 61 FR 49064, Sept. 18, 1996; USCG-2009-0686, 75 FR 16009, Mar. 31, 2010]
14910-13-PI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

### """."''''~' 

# '~'lb'SO Federal Aviation AdministratioD 14CFR Part 39 

# 1\9CO IDocket No. FAA-20t6-uu*; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-145-AD] RIN 212o-AA64 "It

Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB, 

### SaabAclrosystems Model 

### 5MB 2000 Airplanes 

### It' -z," I(~

~"""'. "'M " AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. AcnON: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM).



## AN'" -." ""'-, <'''. (.~ infonnation (MeAl) originated by anaviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsati 

### condition as: /4 -;2. 7-/d SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness dircclive (AD) forthe product "lL'<G"-.....,, flt\1CI- 

## 11'+ listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

Corrosion damage in these areas, ifnofdetected and corrected, can result ina starting point for futw'e crack propagation, which would impair the integrity ofthe horizontal stabilizer upper spar cap structure . Corrosion has been found on the rear spar upper cap ofthe horizontal stabilizer of SAAB 

### 2odo aeroplanes. The affected areas are adjacent to the inboard elevator hingewhere the elee~eal wiring harnesses are located and wired through the lightening holes! The upper spar cap is aprimary structural element and isimportant LO the structural integrity ofthe honzontal stabilizer. 1



# • • 

# • • • • • The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address lhe unsafe condili , ,,,,' "

# .. described inthe MeAl.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-295-000]

      ( print page 35064)    
Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing, for inclusion in Tennessee's FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, Fifth Revised Sheet No. 356, with an effective date of June 21, 2000.

Tennessee states that the purpose of this filing is to modify its Tariff to extend the time period for payment after receipt of invoice by shippers who are entities of foreign governments and whose compliance with required governmental accounting practices do not conform to the invoice and payment provisions of Tennessee's Tariff. Tennessee further states that, if the proposed modifications are accepted, it will avoid the necessity of making individual filings of transportation service agreements entered into with these shippers because these transportation services agreements may contain “material deviations” from the pro forma transportation service agreements. Tennessee requests an effective date of June 21, 2000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13631  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 136.237 Authorized claimants.

A claim for net costs of providing increased or additional public services during or after removal activities, including protection from fire, safety, or health hazards, caused by a discharge of oil may be presented only by a State or a political subdivision of a State incurring the costs.