alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
New York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation 

Assistant Commissioner 

Office of Air Resources, Climate Change & Energy, 14th Floor 

625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-1010 

Phone: (518) 402-8549 Q Fax: (518) 402-8541 Joe Martens

Website: Conunissioner

Ms. Judith A. Enck
 

Regional Administrator
 

U.S. EPA, Region 2
 

290 Broadway, 26th Floor
 

New York, NY 10007-1866
 

Request for Parallel Processing of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART}
 

Permit Modifications
 

Dear Regional Administrator Enck: 

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) has been 

actively working to finalize permit modifications for sources that are subject to the Best 

Available Retrofit Technology (BART) program. Once completed, these modified Title V 

pennits are to be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as revisions to 

the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Regional Haze. 

Attached is a table providing a status update for each of the BART facilities. As ofApril 

4,2012, ten (10) ofthe BART permits have been issued, while two (2) of the remaining seven 

(7) draft permits have been submitted to EPA for review. All draft permits have been published 

in the Department's Environmental Notice Bulletin. (The Department also has one BART 

source complying through a consent decree, and one BART facility shutting down and 

relinquishing its air permits. All relevant supporting materials will be provided to EPA.) 

Pursuant to recent discussions with EPA, the Department is hereby requesting parallel 

processing by EPA of any Title V permit modifications which have not yet been issued in final 

form for inclusion in the regional haze SIP. This will allow for the expedited processing ofthese 

draft permits as they go through the lengthy public comment period and 45-day EPA review 

period. 

The Department is providing, with this letter, copies ofthe Title V permit modifications 

that have been finalized thus far, which incorporate the necessary BART requirements for 

subject sources. The draft permits for the remaining BART sources are also being provided at 

this time so EPA can initiate the approval process. These documents are being provided 

electronically on an enclosed CD. 
We look forward to continuing to work with you to address New York's obligations 

under the Regional Haze program. Should you have any immediate questions or require 

additional information, please contact Mr. Scott Griffin at (518) 402-8396. 

Sincerely, 

I 

·d(~ j{' 

J. Jared Snyder 

Assistant Commissioner 

Office ofAir Resources, Climate Change 

and Energy 

Enclosure 

cc: R. Ruvo, EPA Region 2 

D. Shaw 

R. Sliwinski
### Reconnaissance of ground-water resources in the Eastern Coal Field Region, Kentucky

By: William E. PriceD. S. MullChabot Kilburn

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1607

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 784.146 “Subsequent operations.”

Canning, within the meaning of the exemption, includes operations performed after hermetic sealing of the cans or other containers, such as labeling of them and placing of them in cases or boxes, which are required to place the canned product in the form in which it will be sold or shipped by the canner. This is so whether or not such operations immediately follow the actual canning operations as a part of an uninterrupted process. Storing and shipping operations performed by the employees of the cannery in connection with its canned products, during weeks in which canning operations are going on, to make room for the canned products coming off the line or to make storage room, come within the exemption. The fact that such activities relate in part to products canned during the previous weeks or seasons would not affect the application of the exemption, provided canning operations such as hermetic sealing and sterilizing, or labeling, are currently being carried on.
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.316 What are the requirements for lifejackets? ( a ) Each lifejacket must be approved under approval series 160.002, 160.005, 160.055, 160.077, or 160.176.
( b ) Each lifejacket must have a light approved under approval series 161.012. Each light must be securely attached to the front shoulder area of the lifejacket.
( c ) Each lifejacket must have a whistle permanently attached by a cord.
( d ) Each lifejacket must be fitted with Type I retroreflective material, approved under approval series 164.018.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-10-269-CV

ELIZABETH A. FLACK-BATIE,	APPELLANTS

LISA A. BATIE, AND

ELIZABETH A. BATIE-CHUKES

	V.

JOHN H. BATIE & JHB CONSULTING,	APPELLEES

JOHN J. BATIE, ERIC C. BATIE & 

SOUND FACTORY SYSTEMS LLC,

AND U-HAUL CO. OF FORT WORTH

	------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellants Elizabeth A. Flack-Batie, Lisa A. Batie, and Elizabeth A. Batie- Chukes appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their case below for want of prosecution.  The trial court’s dismissal order was signed May 7, 2010.  Appellants’ motion to reinstate was filed June 10, 2010, more than thirty days after the trial court’s dismissal order.2  The notice of appeal was not filed until August 3, 2010.3

	On August 4, 2010, because it appeared that the postjudgment motion to reinstate filed June 10, 2010, three days after its June 7, 2010 due date, was untimely,4 and that therefore the notice of appeal was untimely,5 depriving this court of jurisdiction,6 we notified Appellants of our concern and requested that they advise us whether they had mailed the postjudgment motion to reinstate on or before its due date.  The photocopies of certified mail receipts Appellants provided show that their motion to reinstate was not mailed until June 8, 2010, one day late.

	Accordingly, because their motion to reinstate was late, it did not extend Appellants’ deadline for filing the notice of appeal.7  The notice of appeal remained due June 7, 2010,8 but it was not filed until August 3, 2010.  Because the notice of appeal was untimely,9 we deny all pending requests for relief, and we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.10

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  September 30, 2010
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: August 8, 2011. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10386
Bank of Shorewood
Shorewood
IL
8/5/201110387
Bank of Whitman
Colfax
WA
8/5/2011


[FR Doc. 2011-20509 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1




Section 906 Certification


_______________








The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of the MLM IndexTM Fund and each Series (the MLM Index Unleveraged Series, the MLM Index Leveraged Series, the MLM Commodity L/N Index Unleveraged Series and the MLM Commodity L/S Index Unleveraged Series)pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).





The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the MLM IndexTM Fund and each Series (the MLM Index Unleveraged Series, the MLM Index Leveraged Series, the MLM Commodity L/N Index Unleveraged Series and the MLM Commodity L/S Index Unleveraged Series).





August 15, 2011By: /s/ Timothy J. Rudderow, Sr.Timothy J. Rudderow, Sr.PresidentMount Lucas Management LP,the manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
p110548.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0548

Focus Ready Draft 9/26/2011

ENGINEER: Avcin \ BCS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Advanced Polymer Technology

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

 

 

 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
p110548.eng

(EPI).

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (09/16/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Analog: Health: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B2T1 PMN: P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt: P2B2T1

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

1) # of workers exposed: >1000? 

2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
p110548.eng

3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100

days/yr: 

 (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0548

MFG: Manufacture of PMN

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

Advanced Polymer Technology Harmony PA 16037

Days/yr: 100

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. Note SAT concern for dermal and

inhalation only. All releases are expected to

incineration or landfill.

Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 2.0E+2 kg/site-day over 1 day/yr from 1 site

or 2.0E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

2.0E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 3

Basis:

Inhalation:

negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal:

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
p110548.eng

Exposure to Liquid at 100.00% concentration

High End: 1.8E+3 mg/day over 100 days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 3

Basis:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0548

PROC/USE: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

Advanced Polymer Technology Harmony PA 16037

Days/yr: 100

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. Note SAT concern for dermal and

inhalation only. All releases are expected to

incineration or landfill.

Incineration or Landfill

High End: 4.0E+1 kg/site-day over 1 day/yr from 1 site

or 4.0E+1 kg/yr

Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 2.0E+2 kg/site-day over 1 day/yr from 1 site

or 2.0E+2 kg/yr

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
p110548.eng

RELEASE TOTAL

2.4E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 0

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:



MEMORANDUM of TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Brandon Smith

Organization: ERG for CEB

CALL TO: Frank Lucarelli

Organization: Advanced Polymer Technology

Date: 09/19/2011

Time: 10:30am

Phone: 

PMN: 11-0548

Page 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40814 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. HECTOR RAFAEL DELEON

- AJIATAZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:13

- CR

- 199

- 1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hector Rafael Deleon

- Ajiataz pleaded guilty to being found knowingly and unlawfully present in the United States following deport ation and received a below

- guidelines prison sentence of 36 mont hs. Deleon

- Ajiataz argues on appeal that he was improperly convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) ’s enhanced statutory maximum sentence, asserting that he does not have a prior conviction for an aggravated felony as the statute requires.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 3, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40814 Document: 00512651067 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2014No. 13

- 40814
Our review is for plain error. United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 368 (5th Cir. 2009). The statutes of conviction and adjudicative records that we may consider, see Shepard v. United States , 544 U.S. 13, 17

- 26 (2005) ; Taylor v. United States , 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990) , do not support a determination that Deleon

- Ajiataz had a prior aggravated felony conviction as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). Regardless of any plain error, however, Deleon

- Ajiataz is not entitled to remand for resentencing because, as he concedes, he cannot show that any error affected his sentence

. See Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d at 369. Nonetheless, because Deleon

- Ajiataz’s illegal reentry offense was a § 1326 ( b )(1) violation rather than a § 1326( b )(2) violation, we RE MAND for the sole purpose of reforming the judgment to reflect the proper statute of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. In all other respects, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-40814 Document: 00512651067 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2014
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08359

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 08359\08359_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08359\08359_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 08359\08359_Followup Response_MS.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

08359\08359_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08359\08359_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08359\08359_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08359\08359_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08359\08359_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08359\08359_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08359\08359_telecon1.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08359\08359_telecon2.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08359\08359_telecon3.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08359\08359_telecon4.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 08359\Supporting Documentation\Fwd Re Effluent Surveys.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08359\Supporting Documentation\Topaz Power Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08359\08359_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.415 When conducting site evaluation and pre-construction testing, what must be reported? ( a ) When conducting site evaluation or pre-construction testing, the following must be immediately reported by any means to the Commandant (CG-5P): ( 1 ) Any evidence of objects of cultural, historical, or archeological significance;
( 2 ) Any adverse effect on the environment;
( 3 ) Any interference with authorized uses of the Outer Continental Shelf;
( 4 ) Any threat to human health and welfare; and
( 5 ) Any adverse effect on an object of cultural, historical, or archeological significance.
( b ) Within 120 days after the site evaluation or pre-construction testing, a final written report must be submitted to the Commandant (CG-5P) that contains: ( 1 ) A narrative description of the activities performed;
( 2 ) A chart, map, or plat of the area where the activities occurred;
( 3 ) The dates when the activities were performed;
( 4 ) Information on the adverse effects of items reported under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 5 ) Data on the historical or archeological significance of the area where the activities were conducted, including a report by an underwater archeologist; and
( 6 ) Any additional information required by the Commandant (CG-5P) on a case-by-case basis.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
#### § 110.77b Madeline Island, Wisconsin.

The waters off of La Pointe Harbor, Madeline Island, Wisconsin, encompassed by the following: starting at 46°46′44.8′′ N, 090°47′14.0′′ W; then south southwesterly to 46°46′35.5′′ N, 090°47′17.0′′ W; then south southeasterly to 46°46′27′′ N, 090°47′12.8′′ W; then east southeasterly to 46°46′22.6′′ N, 090°46′58.8′′ W; then following the shoreline back to the starting point (NAD 83).

[CGD09-03-284, 69 FR 32445, June 10, 2004]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.600 Lagoon Pond. The draw of the Lagoon Pond Bridge, mile 0.0 in Tisbury, Massachusetts, shall operate as follows: ( a ) The draw shall open on signal from May 15 through September 15, from 8:15 a.m. to 8:45 a.m., from 10:15 a.m. to 11 a.m., from 3:15 p.m. to 4 p.m., from 5 p.m. to 5:45 p.m., and from 7:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. At all other times the draw will open for the passage of vessels if at least four (4) hours advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( b ) The draw shall open on signal from September 16 through May 14 if at least a twenty-four (24) hours advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( c ) The owners of this bridge shall provide and keep in good legible condition, clearance gauges for each draw with figures not less than twelve (12) inches high designed, installed and maintained according to the provisions of section 118.160 of this chapter.
[CGD01-95-001, 60 FR 51729, Oct. 3, 1995]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Alabama Industries: A Study of Hours, Wages and Working Conditions

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in Alabama Industries: A Study of Hours, Wages and Working Conditions : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 34*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1924,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5357,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
October 30, 2012

.



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RAYMOND FIELD , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00937

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the reco rd of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certifi ed below for observance.