alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

                                              AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
                                                AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Six Months                Three Months
                                                        Ended December 31         Ended December 31,
                                                       1996         1995          1996         1995
                                                       ----         ----          ----         ----

<S>                                                 <C>          <C>            <C>          <C> 

COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME:
  Net income for primary earnings
    per common share                                $ 1,544,000  $ 1,605,000     $  893,000   $  998,000
  Add:  Debenture interest and amortization
    expense, net of income taxes                        246,000      304,000        123,000      152,000
                                                    -----------  -----------     ----------   ----------
  Adjusted net income for fully diluted
    earnings per common share                       $ 1,790,000  $ 1,909,000     $1,016,000   $1,150,000
                                                    ===========  ===========     ==========   ==========
COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
 SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Weighted average shares outstanding                12,387,000   11,845,000     12,442,000   11,882,000
  Add:  Effect of options and warrants outstanding      889,000      826,000        706,000      744,000
                                                    -----------  -----------     ----------   ----------
  Weighted average shares and common share
    equivalents used for computation of primary
    earnings per common share                        13,276,000   12,671,000     13,148,000   12,626,000
  Add:  Effect of additional options and warrants
    outstanding for fully diluted computation            70,000       11,000        139,000        -
  Add:  Shares assumed to be issued upon
    conversion of debentures                          1,774,000    1,777,000      1,774,000    1,776,000
                                                    -----------  -----------     ----------   ----------
  Weighted average shares and common share
    equivalents used for computation of fully
    diluted earnings per common share                15,120,000   14,459,000     15,061,000   14,402,000
                                                    ===========  ===========    ===========  ===========
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE AND COMMON
 SHARE EQUIVALENT:
  Primary                                               $ .12       $ .13          $ .07        $ .08
                                                        =====       =====          =====        =====
  Fully Diluted                                         $ .12       $ .13          $ .07        $ .08
                                                        =====       =====          =====        =====
</TABLE>
§ 151.55 Recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) The master or person in charge of a ship to which this section applies shall ensure that a written record is maintained on the ship of each of the following garbage discharge or disposal operations: ( 1 ) Discharge to a reception facility or to another ship;
( 2 ) Incineration on the ship;
( 3 ) Discharge into the sea; and/or
( 4 ) Accidental or other exceptional discharges.
( b ) When garbage is discharged to a reception facility or to another ship, the record under paragraph (a) of this section must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The date and time of the discharge;
( 2 ) If the operation was conducted at a port, the name of the port;
( 3 ) If the operation was not conducted at a port, the latitude and longitude of the location where the operation was conducted, and if the operation involved off-loading to another ship, the name and official number of the receiving ship;
( 4 ) The categories of garbage involved; and
( 5 ) The estimated amount of each category of garbage discharged, described by volume in cubic meters.
( c ) When garbage is incinerated on the ship, the record under paragraph (a) of this section must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The date and time of the starting and stopping of the incineration;
( 2 ) The latitude and longitude of the ship at the starting and stopping of the incineration;
( 3 ) The categories of the garbage involved; and
( 4 ) The estimated amount of each category of garbage involved, described by volume in cubic meters.
( d ) When garbage which is allowed into the sea is discharged overboard, the record under paragraph (a) of this section must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The date and time of the discharge;
( 2 ) The latitude and longitude of the ship;
( 3 ) The categories of the garbage involved; and
( 4 ) The estimated amount of each category of garbage involved, described by volume in cubic meters.
( e ) For the record under paragraph (a) of this section, the categories of garbage are ( 1 ) Plastics,
( 2 ) Food wastes,
( 3 ) Domestic wastes,
( 4 ) Cooking oil,
( 5 ) Incinerator ashes,
( 6 ) Operational wastes,
( 7 ) Cargo residues,
( 8 ) Animal carcasses, and
( 9 ) Fishing gear.
( f ) The record under paragraph (a) of this section must be prepared at the time of the operation, certified as correct by the master or person in charge of the ship, maintained on the ship for 2 years following the operation, and made available for inspection by the Coast Guard.
[USCG-2012-1049, 78 FR 13491, Feb. 28, 2013]
§ 133.5 Requests: General. ( a ) Upon a request submitted in accordance with this part by the Governor of a State or his or her designated State official, the OSC may obtain a Federal Project Number (FPN) and a ceiling not to exceed $250,000 per incident for removal costs. The removal costs must be for the immediate removal of a discharge, or the mitigation or prevention of a substantial threat of a discharge, of oil.
( b ) Before a request under this part is made, the State official will ensure that the procedures in the National Contingency Plan (40 CFR part 300) for notifying Federal authorities of the discharge or threat of discharge have been met.
( c ) The Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977 (31 U.S.C. 6301-6308), 2 CFR part 3000, 6 CFR part 9, and 49 CFR parts 18 and 90, apply to Fund monies obligated for payment under this part.
[CGD 92-014, 57 FR 53969, Nov. 13, 1992, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39175, July 1, 2013]
Unassociated Document








Exhibit 10.1


Agreement of Contract Termination







Party A: Wuhan Fengze Agricultural Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Fengze”)


Legal Address: 228 Yanjiang Ave., Jiang’an District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province


Legal Representative: Hanying Li







Party B: An Puluo Food, Inc. (“An Puluo”)


Legal Address: Hebaliang, Xiangfeng Town, Laifeng County, Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Hubei Province


Legal Representative: Wenping Luo







In accordance with the principle of friendly negotiation and mutual benefits, the original Strategic Cooperation Agreement between Tianli & An Puluo executed on March 29th, 2011 and the original Cooperation Supplementary Agreement between Tianli & An Puluo executed on August 1st, 2011 will hereby be terminated since June 15, 2012, all the terms and conditions of these two agreements are cancelled at the same time. From now on, Party A and Party B turn to be supplier and customer from the previous cooperation partner. Party A will sell hogs to Party B directly, and Party B will pay to Party A. Besides, both parties will not be bounded or limited by exclusive supply and exclusive sales.







There are two copies of this Agreement, one for each party, and will take effect upon execution.


 


Party A: Wuhan Fengze Agricultural Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.


Legal Representative:  Hanying Li (Signature)


Wuhan Fengze Agricultural Science& Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Seal)







Party B: An Puluo Food, Inc.


Legal representative: Wenping Luo (Signature)


An Puluo Food, Inc. (Seal)







Signed at: Laifeng County, Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Hubei Province
35426 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 107 / Friday, June 2, 2000 / Notices

Last name First Middle

ZAHM ...................................................................................... HANS

ZAHM ...................................................................................... MINA

ZAVADIL ................................................................................. CAROLYN MARIE

Approved: May 14, 2000.

Doug Rogers,

Chief, Special Projects Branch, International

District.

[FR Doc. 00–13775 Filed 6–1–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

May 26, 2000.

The Office of Thrift Supervision

(OTS) has submitted the following

public information collection

requirement(s) to OMB for review and

clearance under the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–

13. Interested persons may obtain copies

of the submission(s) by calling the OTS

Clearance Officer listed. Send comments

regarding this information collection to

the OMB reviewer listed and to the OTS

Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift

Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20552.

DATES: Submit written comments on or

before July 3, 2000.

OMB Number: 1550—0011.

Form Number: Not applicable.

Type of Review: Regular.

Title: General Reporting and

Recordkeeping by Savings Associations.

Description: This collection of

information allows management of

savings associations to exercise prudent

controls and to provide OTS with a

means of determining the integrity of

savings association records and

operations when examining for safety,

soundness, and regulatory compliance.

Respondents: Savings and Loan

Associations and Savings Banks.

Estimated Number of Responses:

1,104.

Estimated Burden Hours Per

Response: 3,369 hours.

Frequency of Response: Once per

activity.

Estimated Total Reporting Burden:

3,718,911 hours.

Clearance Officer: Mary RawlingsMilton, (202) 906–6028, Office of Thrift

Supervision, 1700 Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20552.

OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202)

395–7860, Office of Management and

Budget, Room 10202, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

John E. Werner,

Director, Information and Management

Services.

[FR Doc. 00–13752 Filed 6–1–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720–01–P
AGE OUT LOUD BECAUSE

OLDER

AMERICANS

MONTH

AGE OUT L OUD : MAY 2017 #OAM17
October 2, 2015

Mr. Scott Shellenberger

Perkins Cinders, Inc,

1950 East Adams #C

Show Low, AZ 85901

Dear Mr. Shellenberger :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your May 10, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of Perkins Cinders, Inc. filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2879 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements o f § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.693 What are the requirements for personnel landings on manned deepwater ports? ( a ) On manned deepwater ports, sufficient personnel landings must be provided to assure safe access and egress.
( b ) The personnel landings must be provided with satisfactory illumination. The minimum is 1 foot candle of artificial illumination as measured at the landing floor and guards and rails.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of China Marine Food Group Limited, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:



The Amendment
No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Amendment") of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to China Marine Food Group Limited and will be retained by China Marine Food Group Limited
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated: December 13, 2012 | /s/ Pengfei Liu                     
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|                         | Pengfei Liu, Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.5 Requirements for vessel manufacturers. No manufacturer may manufacture for sale, sell, offer for sale, or distribute for sale or resale any vessel equipped with installed toilet facilities unless it is equipped with: ( a ) An operable Type II or III device that has a label on it under § 159.16 or that is certified under § 159.12 or § 159.12a; or
( b ) An operable Type I device that has a label on it under § 159.16 or that is certified under § 159.12, if the vessel is 19.7 meters (65 feet) or less in length.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51194, Sept. 30, 1997]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-51037

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MENCHACA, also known

as Joe Menchaca, also 

known as Joe L. Menchaca, also 

known as Jose Luis Menchaca,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-98-CR-96-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

July 6, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

José Menchaca appeals his jury conviction for possession of

a firearm by a felon and possession of a firearm with obliterated

serial numbers. He contends that his statement made to the

police should have been suppressed at trial because he was not

advised of his Miranda1 rights. No motion to suppress was filed

in the district court and thus any argument with respect thereto 
No. 98-51037

-2-

is waived. See United States v. Chavez-Valencia, 116 F.3d 127,

130 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 325 (1997); FED. R. CRIM.

P. 12(b)(3). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99(a)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airborne, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Carl D. Donaway, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    CARL D. DONAWAYCarl D. DonawayChairman and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2002
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-55 Hearing procedures. ( a ) The Hearing Officer must conduct a fair and impartial proceeding in which the party is given a full opportunity to be heard. At the outset of the hearing, the Hearing Officer insures that the party is aware of the nature of the proceeding and of the alleged violation, and of the provisions of the law or regulation allegedly violated.
( b ) The material in the case file pertinent to the issues to be determined by the Hearing Officer is presented. The party has the right to examine, and to respond to or rebut, this material. The party may offer any facts, statements, explanations, documents, sworn or unsworn testimony, or other exculpatory items which bear on appropriate issues, or which may be relevant to the size of an appropriate penalty. The Hearing Officer may require the authentication of any written exhibit or statement.
( c ) At the close of the party's presentation of evidence, the Hearing Officer may allow the introduction of rebuttal evidence. The Hearing Officer may allow the party to respond to any such evidence submitted.
( d ) In receiving evidence, the Hearing Officer is not bound by strict rules of evidence. In evaluating the evidence presented, the Hearing Officer must give due consideration to the reliability and relevance of each item of evidence.
( e ) The Hearing Officer may take notice of matters which are subject to a high degree of indisputability and are commonly known in the community or are ascertainable from readily available sources of known accuracy. Prior to taking notice of a matter, the Hearing Officer gives the party an opportunity to show why notice should not be taken. In any case in which notice is taken, the Hearing Officer places a written statement of the matters as to which notice was taken in the record, with the basis for such notice, including a statement that the party consented to notice being taken or a summary of the party's objections.
( f ) After the evidence in the case has been presented, the party may present argument on the issues in the case. The party may also request an opportunity to submit a written statement for consideration by the Hearing Officer and for further review. The Hearing Officer shall allow a reasonable time for submission of the statement and shall specify the date by which it must be received. If the statement is not received within the time prescribed, or within the limits of any extension of time granted by the Hearing Officer, the Hearing Officer renders his decision in the case.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BR AN DO N RUI Z, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. D R. A K I N TO LA ; N A SEER, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 16516 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 3 1 8 - J A MGG H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . M e nde z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B efo re: T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner B rand on R ui z app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s s u m m aryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e lib e r a te i n d i f f e r e n c e t o h i s s e r i o u s me d i c a l n e e d s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED NO V 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16516 2 § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . T oguc hiv . Chung , 39 1 F . 3d 10 51 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f

f irm . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr ant e d s um m aryj udgm e ntbe c aus e R ui z di d not r a i s e age nui ne di s put e of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta s t o w he the rde f

e ndant s kne w of

and d is r e g ar d e dan e x c e s s iv e r is kto h is h e a lth . Se e id. at10 57 -58 (a pri son o ff i ci al a c t s w i th de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e onl yi f

he know s of

and di s r e gar ds an e xc e s s i ve ri skt o an i n m at e’ s h eal th o r safety, an da d i fferen ce o f o p i n i o n ab o u tth e b est c o u r s e o f m e d ic a l tr e a tm e n t d o e s n o t a m o u n t to d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e ) . R ui z’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter of
fiscal year 2008 ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  May 9, 2008
    /s/ Kevin KyserKevin Kyser,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.