alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and Subsidiaries, for the
fiscal year ended October 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         183,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,219<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,921
<INVENTORY>                                    130,582<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               499,501
<PP&E>                                         275,631
<DEPRECIATION>                               (144,551)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,035
<OTHER-SE>                                     604,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,765
<SALES>                                        828,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               828,009
<CGS>                                          438,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  438,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               255,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   654
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                136,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             87,463
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,463
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
<FN>
<F1>Amount is net of allowance for bad debts and returns and allowances.
<F2>Amount is net of obsolescence reserves.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 7, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00539

- CV

IN RE TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES, LLC and Luquita Joy

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On August 31, 2015, relators Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC and Luquita Joy filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief. The court has considered relators’ petition, the response and reply of the parties, and has determined that relators are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is CONDITIONALLY

GRANTED. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(c).

The Honorable Stephani Walsh is ORDERED to vacate the August 21, 2015 Order on

Petitioner Fernando Ozuna’s V erified Petition to Take Deposition Before Suit. The writ will issue only if we are notified Judge Walsh has not done as directed within fifteen days from the date of

this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 7, 2015

.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of October, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015

- CI

- 09313, styled In re Fernando Ozuna , pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
#### § 516.11 Employees exempt from both minimum wage and overtime pay requirements under section 13(a) (2), (3), (4), (5), (8), (10), (12), or 13(d) of the Act.

With respect to each and every employee exempt from both the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements of the Act pursuant to the provisions of section 13(a) (2), (3), (4), (5), (8), (10), (12), or 13(d) of the Act, employers shall maintain and preserve records containing the information and data required by § 516.2(a) (1) through (4).
Exhibit No. 21


Madison Gas and Electric Company and Consolidated Subsidiaries

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

As of December 31, 1996, the Company owned 100 percent of the voting
securities of the following subsidiaries (all Wisconsin corporations):

- MAGAEL INC. - holds title to property acquired by the Company for future
utility plant expansion and nonutility property.

- Central Wisconsin Development Corporation - assists new and expanding
businesses throughout Central Wisconsin by participating in planning,
financing, property acquisition, joint ventures, and associated activities.

- Great Lakes Energy Corp. - markets fuels and energy services to commercial,
industrial, and governmental customers in the Upper Midwest. (See Item 7,
page II-7, and Item 8, page F-16, for further discussion.)

- Wisconsin Resources Corporation - Inactive.

- North Central Technologies, Inc. - Inactive.

- Mid America Technologies, Inc. - Inactive.

As of December 31, 1996, Great Lakes Energy Corp. owned 100 percent of the
voting securities of the following subsidiary (a Wisconsin corporation):

- American Energy Management, Inc. - a national energy marketing firm that
provides gas marketing, energy management, energy auditing, and conservation
services to customers in 12 states. (See Item 7, page II-7, and Item 8,
page F-16, for further discussion.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2265

TERRENCE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:23-cv-02110-TDC)

Submitted: March 12, 2024 Decided: March 14, 2024

Before GREGORY, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence D. Williams, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2265 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/14/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrence D. Williams, Sr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 

employment discrimination complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with the 

court’s order to pay the filing fee or file a renewed motion to proceed in form pauperis.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s order. Williams v. Montgomery Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 8:23-cv-02110-TDC 

(D. Md. Nov. 16, 2023). We also deny Williams’ motion to seal documents. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2265 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/14/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
1

Filed 4/30/13 P. v. Colbourn CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or

ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published f or purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ORIN COLBOURN,

Defendant and Appellant. C069946

(Super. Ct. No. 10F02636)

Defendant Orin Colbourn pled no contest to an April 2010 offense of reckless

driving while eluding a pursuing peace officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)) and

admitted a 2003 juvenile strike adjudication of assaulting a police officer (Pen. Code,

§§ 245, subd. (c), 667, subds. (b)

- (i), 1170.12). In exchange, seven related counts were

dismissed. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for the midterm of two years,

doubled for the prior strike, and was awarded 552 days of custody credit and 276 days of

co nduct credit.2

On appeal, defendant contends that, as a matter of federal constitutional law, his

prior juvenile adjudication cannot qualify as a strike. He submitted, but later withdrew,

his contention that he was entitled to additional custody and con duct credit. 1 We affirm

the judgment.

FACTS

The facts of defendant’s offenses are not at issue and need not be set forth in this

opinion.

DISCUSSION

Defendant contends the trial court erred, in violation of his Sixth Amendment right

to jury trial and hi s Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, when it concluded his

2003 juvenile adjudication qualified as a prior serious felony strike conviction for the

purpose of increasing his maximum punishment.

As defendant acknowledges, the California Supreme Cou rt rejected his contention

in People v. Nguyen (2009) 46 Cal.4th 1007 at pages 1010

- 1019. Defendant recognizes

Nguyen is binding upon this court. ( Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)

57 Cal.2d 450, 455; see People v. Pacheco (2011) 194 Cal.A pp.4th 343, 345

- 346.)

Accordingly, his contention has no merit.

1 Defendant also raised the credit issue by motion in the trial court. Defendant

subsequently advised this court his motion in the trial court was granted and an amended

abstract of judgment was filed with the correct credits: 554 days of custod y credit and

554 days of conduct credit. We granted his request to withdraw this argument.3 DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HOCH , J.

We concur:

NICHOLSON , Acting P. J.

MURRAY , J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 99N-4933] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “FDA Safety Alert/Public Health Advisory Readership Survey” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 22, 2000 (65 FR 15345), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-341. The approval expires on May 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

Dated: May 26, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 00-13743 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
**ATTACHMENT A**

**FY 2009 STATE PLAN GUIDANCE**

**INTRASTATE (IFF) FUNDING FORMULA REQUIREMENTS**

Each State IFF submittal must demonstrate that the requirements in Sections 305(a)(2)(C) have been met:

******OAA, Sec. 305(a)(2)

“*States shall,*

*(C) in consultation with area agencies, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Assistant Secretary, and using the best available data, develop and publish for review and comment a formula for distribution within the State of funds received under this title that takes into account‐‐*

*(i) the geographical distribution of older individuals in the State; and*

*(ii) the distribution among planning and service areas of older individuals with greatest economic need and older individuals with greatest social need, with particular attention to low‐income minority older individuals*.”

· For purposes of the IFF, “best available data” is the most recent census data (year 2000 or later), or more recent data of equivalent quality available in the State. 

· As required by Section 305(d) of the OAA, the IFF revision request includes: a descriptive Statement; a numerical Statement; and a list of the data used (by planning and service area). 

· The request also includes information on how the proposed formula will affect funding to each planning and service area. 

· States may use a base amount in their IFFs to ensure viable funding for each Area Agency but generally, a hold harmless provision is discouraged because it adversely affects those planning and service areas experiencing significant population growth.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

____________________________________ 

 

 

_____________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 16, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134393(93)(94) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134406 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. WILLIAM MILLER, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

 SC: 134393 

v COA: 259992 

Wayne CC: 03-325030-NF

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant,

Cross-Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

PT WORKS, INC.,

Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee. 

WILLIAM MILLER,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 134406 
 v COA: 259992 
 Wayne CC: 03-325030-NF

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant,

Cross-Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

PT WORKS, INC.,

Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Insurance Institute of Michigan 

for leave to file a brief amicus curiae and for leave to exceed the page limitation are 

considered and they are GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 16, 2008 

 Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.933 Pee Dee River.

The draws of the Seaboard System Railroad bridges, mile 72.6 near Poston and mile 107.2 near Pee Dee, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
**-  Midwest  
-  Morris, Minnesota 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**SOIL CARBON CYCLING, TRACE GAS EMISSION, TILLAGE AND CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT
**Location: Morris, Minnesota**
												Project Number: 3645-11000-003-00Project Type:																				Appropriated

Start Date: Apr 15, 2006End Date: Apr 14, 2011

**Objective:**1.	Determine how crop, biomass and soil management practices alter the rate at which carbon and nitrogen are stored in soil or released as greenhouse gas emissions to develop economically viable practices that enhance storage and minimize emissions particularly in the cool, wet, glacial-till soils in the north Central United States. 2.	Evaluate impacts of global environmental changes on traditional, biofuel and alternative crops.
**Approach:**Carbon cycling will be conducted as part of a national monitoring effort (GRACEnet).  Soil physical, chemical and biological factors, and crop inputs will be monitored over time. Established long-term field experiments will be continued to assess impact of tillage method on carbon storage, trace gas emission and economic yield. The active, transitional and passive pools will be assessed in the tillage treatments to determine the rate and direction of change in the various pools. On-farm research is comparing the impact of high manure application on gas exchange monitored by eddy covariance and monitoring the nutrient content of tile water samples. Economic analysis will be conducted to evaluate the economic returns for the different residue removal/tillage combinations.  Field experiments will be conducted to obtain plant parameters from a range of species and management systems.  The plant data will be integrated with the soil carbon data to statistically model dynamics of C inputs and subsequent changes in carbon pools. Plant information will be collected from growth chamber and/or greenhouse experiments utilizing controlled conditions to mimic desired environmental stresses.
    Project TeamJohnson, Jane Reicosky, Donald  - *Don*Weyers, Sharon Jaradat, Abdullah Gesch, Russell  - *Russ* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 Publications  Publications 
Related National Programs Global Change(204) Soil Resource Management(202) Crop Production(305) Related Projects  IMPROVED GHG INVENTORY METHODS FOR CALIFORNIA  ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT THROUGH CORNSTOVER UTILIZATION  							Last Modified: 11/07/2008 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
GMEP Engineers 

26439 Rancho Parkway S., Ste #120 

Lake Forest, CA 92630 

Ph: (949)267-9095, Fax: (877)375-0936 

www.gmepe.com 

October 14, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S W 

Washington, DC 20591 

To Whom It May Concern, 

I am writing to request an exemption for the use of drones to take pictures and video of 

construction sites which our company does engineering design for in California. We 

are an engineering consulting company that provides mechanical, electrical, and 

plumbing design services for various projects. We intend take photos throughout the 

construction progress to track and changes and to monitor design. We may also use 

these photos on our website or in our promotional materials such as brochures. To 

take these photos, we propose to use the DJI Phantom 3 Professional version. We 

hope that you approve out exemption request as it will be a great help to our company 

to be able to provide this service to supplement our design. 

Thank you, 

Gangyi (Gary) Zhou 

Ph.D, P.E., LEED AP BD+C 

Founder and Principal 

GMEP Engineers 

26439 Rancho Parkway S., Ste #120 

Lake Forest, CA 92630 

(P)949-267-9095 

(C)949-209-7164 

Email: gzhou@gmepe.com 

URL: www.gmepe.com
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40934

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES L. SWEED,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN ZELLER; MAJOR CAMPUZANO WILLISON; ANN RICHARDS,

Governor,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-94-CV-484

- - - - - - - - - -

April 17, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James L. Sweed appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He argued in the district court

that the defendants denied him equal protection because they

allowed Hispanic inmates to watch Hispanic rap music on

television but refused to allow black inmates to watch AfricanAmerican rap music. The magistrate judge dismissed Sweed’s

complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On

appeal, Sweed does not address the merits of the district
court's opinion. His appeal is frivolous and is dismissed

accordingly. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff

Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Sweed that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Sweed is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**Taking Steps to Prevent Falls**

When you’re young, an injury from a fall may sideline you for a few days or weeks, but a full recovery is usually quick. As you get older, the consequences of falls can become more serious, setting up a sequence of events that can have longstanding implications on independence and health.

It doesn’t have to be that way, however. Although falls typically become more common and can be more serious as you age, falls are not a natural part of getting older. In fact, most falls are preventable. Knowing the factors that put you at greater risk of falling and taking proper steps can help prevent falls. 

Risk factors for falls in older people include overall health (chronic diseases and physical conditions), environment (hazards and situations at home) and behaviors, such as rushing around or standing on a chair to reach something. 

These steps from the experts at the National Council on Aging can help prevent falls:

· **Stay active:** Exercise helps increase or maintain coordination and muscle tone that can keep you steady on your feet and your reactions sharp. Walking, gardening or taking an exercise class are just a few ways to keep your heart healthy and your muscles toned. 

· **Manage underlying chronic conditions:** The better your overall health, the lower your risk of falls. Chronic conditions like diabetes, depression, osteoarthritis, obesity and high blood pressure can increase your risk. Managing those conditions by seeing your health care provider regularly, taking medication as prescribed, eating a healthy diet and choosing appropriate exercise can help prevent falls. 

· **Review medications:** Side effects from and interactions with some medications can cause dizziness that can increase the risk of falling. Types of medicine associated with an increased risk include sedatives and diuretics as well as those used to treat high blood pressure and anxiety. Talk to your doctor about all prescriptions and over-the-counter medicines you are taking.

· **Get your eyes checked:** Vision changes as you age, so it is important to get your eyes checked once a year to make sure your prescription is up to date and screen for any eye-related diseases like cataracts and glaucoma, which are usually treatable when caught at an early stage.

· **Assess your home:** Look around your home for potential hazards. Consider enlisting the help of a family member or neighbor who may be more likely to notice things you don’t. Install grab bars in your bathrooms, get rid of slippery throw rugs (or add a rubber backing) and keep passageways inside and outside your home well-lit and free from clutter and debris.

For more tips and information, visit https://www.acl.gov/fallsprevention.