alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 051900C]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Summer Flounder 
Working Group will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 13, 2000, from 10 a.m. 
until 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Sheraton BWI Airport, 7032 
Elm Road, Baltimore, MD; telephone: 410-691-9827.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Room 
2115, 300 S. New Street, Dover, DE 19904.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: 302-674-2331, ext. 
19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to consider 
future management measures and possible actions for the summer flounder 
fishery.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Joanna Davis at the Council Office (see 
ADDRESSES) at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: May 22, 2000.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-13372 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Exhibit 4.3.1

Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Facility Lease Agreement

|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL1, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner
Lessor.
|2. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL2, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.
|3. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL3, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.
|4. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL4, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.
|5. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL5, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.
|6. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL6, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.
|7. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL7, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.
|8. |  | The Facility Lease dated as of December 7, 2001 by and among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, as Facility Lessee and Homer City OL8, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner Lessor.

---

QuickLinks
§ 4022.26 Benefit guarantee for participants who are majority owners. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies to the guarantee of all benefits described in subpart A of this part (subject to the limitations in § 4022.21) with respect to participants who are majority owners at the termination date or who were majority owners at any time within the five-year period preceding that date.
( b ) *Formula.* Benefits provided by a plan are guaranteed to the extent provided in the following formula: The amount of the participant's benefit that PBGC would otherwise guarantee under section 4022 of ERISA and this part if the participant were not a majority owner, multiplied by a fraction not to exceed one, the numerator of which is the number of full years from the later of the effective date or the adoption date of the plan to the termination date, and the denominator of which is 10.
( c ) *PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination.* In a PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination, “bankruptcy filing date” is substituted for “termination date” in paragraph (b) of this section.
[83 FR 49804, Oct. 3, 2018]
EXHIBIT 32

| |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sona Development Corp. (Registrant) for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Nora Coccaro, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Nora Coccaro

Nora Coccaro

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Big Blue River Basin above Crete, Nebraska

By: C. R. JohnsonCharles Franklin KeechR. Brennan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1474

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TRUTH SHYDEE WILSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 307 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Unpublished

Memorandum and Order of the Superior Court at No. 918 WDA 2019 entered on September 10,
2020, affirming the Judgment of Sentence of the Allegheny County

Court of Common Pleas at No. CP

02

- CR

- 0004689

- 2018 entered on May 22, 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 st day of February, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED , the order of the Superior Court is VACATED , and the case is REMANDED

to the Superior Court for consideration in light of Commonwealth v. Raboin , 258 A.3d 412

(Pa. 2021). The Superior Court is further directed to address whether the forensic

interview was admissible under the tender years exception to the hearsay rule.
Draft Proposal E-11 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Existing Buildings Code (IEBC).   

Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft code

change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/iebc_concepts

Insulation and Air Leakage Inspection (E-11) 

Objective: Provide for inspection of insulation fill and air barriers while components are still 

accessible for inspection. 

Suggested Code Change Proposal 

Add new Section [A] 109.3.5 as follows: 

[A] 109.3.5 Insulation and air leakage inspection. Insulation and air leakage 

inspections shall be made before any assemblies associated with the building thermal 

envelope are enclosed. Such inspections shall ensure that all holes, penetrations, cracks or 

other avenues for air leakage through the assembly are sealed and that all insulation is 

installed in accordance with the manufacturers installation instructions and completely 

fills the cavity in the assembly in which it is installed.

Reason: Forty percent of U.S. energy and seventy percent of U.S. electricity are consumed in 

existing buildings. This is clearly an opportunity for reduction by reinforcing that when thermal 

envelope assemblies are repaired, altered, or added to a building, the assembly is inspected no 

differently from new construction, to ensure that any paths for air leakage are sealed and the 

insulation installation (new or re-application of existing insulation) is done in an appropriate 

manner. This is a critical area in which an inspection can have lasting effects on energy 

efficiency, because once the assembly is closed up, the opportunity to address this is lost 

(unless the assembly is opened up later to address issues that are likely to arise due to not 

having the assembly sealed and the insulation properly installed). 

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact to the builder, contractor, or building owner. Building 

inspection staff may need to take additional time in inspection.
#### § 778.109 The regular rate is an hourly rate.

The “regular rate” under the Act is a rate per hour. The Act does not require employers to compensate employees on an hourly rate basis; their earnings may be determined on a piece-rate, salary, commission, or other basis, but in such case the overtime compensation due to employees must be computed on the basis of the hourly rate derived therefrom and, therefore, it is necessary to compute the regular hourly rate of such employees during each workweek, with certain statutory exceptions discussed in §§ 778.400 through 778.421. The regular hourly rate of pay of an employee is determined by dividing his total remuneration for employment (except statutory exclusions) in any workweek by the total number of hours actually worked by him in that workweek for which such compensation was paid. The following sections give some examples of the proper method of determining the regular rate of pay in particular instances: (The maximum hours standard used in these examples is 40 hours in a workweek).
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Robert Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Maverick Minerals Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 15, 2009

|/s/ Robert Kinloch                                  | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                    | 
|Robert Kinloch                                      | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13807]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701-TA-286 (Review) and 731-TA-365 (Review)]


Industrial Phosphoric Acid From Israel and Belgium

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
determines,\2\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the countervailing duty 
order on industrial phosphoric acid from Israel and the antidumping 
duty order on industrial phosphoric acid from Belgium would not be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Chairman Lynn M. Bragg not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on March 1, 1999 (64 FR 
10017) and determined on June 3, 1999, that it would conduct full 
reviews (64 FR 31610, June 11, 1999). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on July 16, 1999 (64 
FR 38474).\3\ The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on March 30, 
2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission subsequently revised its schedule, publishing 
notice in the Federal Register on January 7, 2000 (65 FR 1173).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on May 22, 2000. The views of the Commission 
are scontained in USITC Publication 3302 (May 2000), entitled 
Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel and Belgium: Investigations Nos. 
701-TA-286 (Review) and 731-TA-365 (Review).

    Issued: May 24, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13807 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 778.206 Premiums for work outside basic workday or workweek—examples.

The effect of section 7(e)(7) where “clock pattern” premiums are paid may be illustrated by reference to provisions typical of the applicable collective bargaining agreements traditionally in effect between employers and employees in the longshore and stevedoring industries. These agreements specify straight time rates applicable during the hours established in good faith under the agreement as the basic, normal, or regular workday and workweek. Under one such agreement, for example, such workday and workweek are established as the first 6 hours of work, exclusive of mealtime, each day, Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Under another typical agreement, such workday and workweek are established as the hours between 8 a.m. and 12 noon and between 1 p.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work outside such workday and workweek is paid for at premium rates not less than one and one-half times the bona fide straight-time rates applicable to like work when performed during the basic, normal, or regular workday or workweek. The extra compensation provided by such premium rates will be excluded in computing the regular rate at which the employees so paid are employed and may be credited toward overtime compensation due under the Act. For example, if an employee is paid $5 an hour under such an agreement for handling general cargo during the basic, normal, or regular workday and $7.50 per hour for like work outside of such workday, the extra $2.50 will be excluded from the regular rate and may be credited to overtime pay due under the Act. Similarly, if the straight time rate established in good faith by the contract should be higher because of handling dangerous or obnoxious cargo, recognition of skill differentials, or similar reasons, so as to be $7.50 an hour during the hours established as the basic or normal or regular workday or workweek, and a premium rate of $11.25 an hour is paid for the same work performed during other hours of the day or week, the extra $3.75 may be excluded from the regular rate of pay and may be credited toward overtime pay due under the Act. Similar principles are applicable where agreements following this general pattern exist in other industries.

[46 FR 7311, Jan. 23, 1981]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 408 

Congratulating the Valdosta State University football team on winning the 

2007 Division II National Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Valdosta State University football team 

on winning the 2007 Division II National Championship. 

Whereas, on December 15, 2007, the Valdosta State University Blazers football team defeated Northwest Missouri 

State University by a score of 25–20 in Florence, Alabama, to win the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division II National Championship; 

Whereas this victory gave Valdosta State University its 2nd 

football national championship title in 4 years; 

Whereas Coach David Dean became only the 2nd 1st-year 

head coach in NCAA history to lead a team to the Division II title; 

Whereas the Blazers finished the season with an impressive 

13–1 record, including victories over Catawba College, 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 408 ATS 

the University of North Alabama, and California University of Pennsylvania in the playoffs to advance to the 

championship game against Northwest Missouri State 

University; and 

Whereas 7 Valdosta State University players were named to 

the All-Gulf Conference team, including wide receiver 

Cedric Jones and safety Sherard Reynolds, who were also 

named to the All-American team: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates and honors the Valdosta State 

3 University Blazers football team on winning the 

4 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Divi5 sion II National Championship; 

6 (2) recognizes and commends the courage, hard 

7 work, and dedication displayed by the Valdosta State 

8 University football team and staff throughout the 

9 season in order to obtain this great honor; and 

10 (3) commends Valdosta State University, the 

11 city of Valdosta, and all of the fans of the Blazers 

12 football team throughout the State of Georgia for 

13 their endless support of this special team throughout 

14 the 2007 championship season. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
#### § 801.72 Responsibility of the Office of Administrative Law Judges.

Upon receipt of the Secretary's Notice of Intent to Modify or Vacate the Decision and Order of an Administrative Law Judge, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall, within fifteen (15) days, forward a copy of the complete hearing record to the Secretary.