50494 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Notices 

Management, 1201 Bird Center Drive, 

Palm Springs, California 92262, or via 

the Internet at the following Web site: 

http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/

palmsprings.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Shaffer, BLM Project Manager; 

telephone (760) 833–7100; through mail 

at the address above; or e-mail 

Allison_Shaffer@blm.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Desert 

Sunlight Holdings, LLC, a wholly 

owned subsidiary of First Solar, Inc., 

filed right-of-way (ROW) application 

CACA–48649 for the Desert Sunlight 

Solar Farm Project (DSSF). The DSSF is 

a solar photovoltaic (PV) facility, 

capable of producing 550 MW of 

electrical output. Southern California 

Edison (SCE) filed a ROW application to 

construct the 500-to-220 kiloVolt (kV) 

RedBluff substation (CACA–052682) 

where the project would interconnect 

with the SCE regional transmission 

system. The DSSF, along with the 

RedBluff Substation and other facilities, 

will be on 4,144 acres of BLM-managed 

lands approximately 6 miles north of 

Interstate-10 and the rural community of 

Desert Center in Riverside County, 

California. The project area is within 2 

miles of Joshua Tree National Park. In 

addition to the project site, the project 

includes a distribution line, a 220-kV 

electrical gen-tie transmission line, fiber 

optic lines, and an access road. The 

RedBluff substation includes an access 

road and two offsite microwave 

telecommunication facilities. The gentie line will feed power into SCE’s 

existing Devers-Palo Verde 1 500-kV 

transmission line. 

The project site is in the California 

Desert District within the planning 

boundary of the CDCA Plan, which is 

the applicable RMP for the project site 

and the surrounding areas. The CDCA 

Plan, while recognizing the potential 

compatibility of solar generation 

facilities on public lands, requires that 

all sites associated with power 

generation or transmission not already 

identified in the Plan be considered 

through the BLM’s land use plan 

amendment process. As a result, prior to 

approval of a ROW grant to the DSSF, 

the BLM must amend the CDCA Plan to 

allow the solar generating project on 

that site The approved Amendment to 

the CDCA Plan specifically revises the 

CDCA Plan to allow for the 

development of the DSSF and ancillary 

facilities on land managed by the BLM. 

The BLM preferred Alternative would 

result in construction of the solar farm, 

capable of generating approximately 550 

MW of electricity, the RedBluff 

Substation, and associated ancillary 

facilities. This 550-MW alternative and 

substation were evaluated in the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

The Notice of Availability of the Final 

EIS for the DSSF, RedBluff Substation, 

and the proposed CDCA Plan 

amendment was published in the 

Federal Register on April 15, 2011 (76 

FR 21402). 

Publication of the Notice of 

Availability for the Final EIS initiated a 

30-day protest period for the proposed 

amendment to the CDCA Plan. At the 

close of the 30-day period on May 16, 

2011, seven timely and complete 

written protests were received and 

resolved. Their resolution is 

summarized in the Director’s Protest 

Summary Report attached to the ROD. 

The proposed amendment to the CDCA 

Plan was not modified as a result of the 

protest resolution. Simultaneously with 

the protest period, the Governor of 

California conducted a 30-day 

consistency review of the proposed 

CDCA Plan amendment to identify any 

inconsistencies with State or local plan, 

policies or programs; no inconsistencies 

were identified. 

Because this decision is approved by 

the Secretary of the Interior, it is not 

subject to administrative appeal (43 

CFR, 4.410(a)(3)). 

Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6. 

Robert V. Abbey, 

Director, Bureau of Land Management. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20671 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–40–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–PWR–PWRO–0714–7930; 8381–1001– 

NZW] 

Water Resources Management Plan/ 

Environmental Impact Statement, 

Mojave National Preserve, San 

Bernardino County, CA 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Scoping 

Period for Water Resources Management 

Plan/Environmental Impact Statement 

for Mojave National Preserve. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969, the National Park Service is 

preparing a Water Resources 

Management Plan/Environmental 

Impact Statement (WRMP/EIS). This 

plan is intended to guide future 

management of ground and surface 

water sources within Mojave National 

Preserve. The original Notice of Intent to 

prepare an EIS (published in the 

Federal Register on May 11, 2011) 

announced a 60-day public comment 

period. In recognition of the complexity 

and scope of the forthcoming EIS, and 

with deference to interest from the 

public and interested organizations, the 

comment period has been extended. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

August 12, 2011. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It will not 

be necessary for individuals, 

orgnaizations, and agencies that have 

already commented to do so again. All 

comments must now be postmarked or 

transmitted not later than August 12, 

2011. Those respondents who prefer to 

comment electronically may do so via 

the project Web site, http://park

planning.nps.gov/mojave_water, or 

letters may be submitted via regular 

mail to: Stephanie Dubois, 

Superintendent, Mojave National 

Preserve, Attn: Mojave WRMP, 2701 

Barstow Road, Barstow, California 

92311. Up-to-date information may be 

obtained by contacting Mojave National 

Preserve at (760) 252–6100. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: July 8, 2011. 

Patricia L. Neubacher, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20620 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–6E–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–0711–8064; 2280– 

665] 

National Register of Historic Places; 

Notification of Pending Nominations 

and Related Actions 

Nominations for the following 

properties being considered for listing 

or related actions in the National 

Register were received by the National 

Park Service before July 23, 2011. 

Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 

60, written comments are being 

accepted concerning the significance of 

the nominated properties under the 

National Register criteria for evaluation. 

Comments may be forwarded by United 

States Postal Service, to the National 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2011 / Notices 50495 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and 

Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson dissent with 

respect to the determinations regarding stainless 

steel plate from Belgium, Korea, South Africa, and 

Taiwan. 

3Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissents with 

respect to the determination regarding stainless 

steel plate from Italy. 

Register of Historic Places, National 

Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, 

Washington, DC 20240; by all other 

carriers, National Register of Historic 

Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye 

St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 

20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written 

or faxed comments should be submitted 

by August 30, 2011. Before including 

your address, phone number, e-mail 

address, or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

J. Paul Loether, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

COLORADO 

Huerfano County 

Veta Pass, 3652, 3665, 3688 Cty. Rd. 443, La 

Veta, 11000607 

Pueblo County 

Pueblo Christopher Columbus Monument, 

Median in 100 Blk. of E. Abriendo Ave., 

Pueblo, 11000608 

CONNECTICUT 

Fairfield County 

Graham House, Address Restricted, 

Stamford, 11000609 

Hartford County 

Sigourney Square Historic District (Boundary 

Increase), 207 Garden St., Hartford, 

11000610 

New Haven County 

Academy of Our Lady of Mercy at Lauralton 

Hall, 200 High St., Milford, 11000611 

Armstrong, M. and Company Carriage 

Factory, 433 Chapel St., New Haven, 

11000612 

IDAHO 

Blaine County 

Fox-Worswick House, 119 E. Bullion St., 

Hailey, 11000613 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Berkshire County 

Wheeler Family Farmstead, 817 S. Main St., 

Great Barrington, 11000614 

Worcester County 

Hassanamisco Reservation, 80 Brighton Hill 

Rd., Grafton, 11000615 

MICHIGAN 

Wayne County 

Tushiyah United Hebrew School—Scott 

Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church, 

609 E. Kirby, Detroit, 11000616 

MISSOURI 

St. Louis Independent City 

St. Louis Place Historic District, Roughly 

bounded by 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 25th, Benton, 

Montgomery, & N. Market Sts., 

Rauschenbach & St. Louis Aves., St. Louis 

(Independent City), 11000617 

NEBRASKA 

Morrill County 

Mud Springs Station Archeological District 

(Boundary Increase), (Conflict & Warfare in 

the North & South Platte Valleys of 

Nebraska, 1864–1865 MPS) Address 

Restricted, Dalton, 11000618 

Rush Creek Battlefield, (Conflict & Warfare in 

the North & South Platte Valleys of 

Nebraska, 1864–1865 MPS) Address 

Restricted, Broadwater, 11000619 

NEW YORK 

New York County 

Fourth Church of Christ, Scientist, The, 551 

Ft. Washington Ave., Manhattan, 11000620 

NORTH CAROLINA 

Gates County 

Reid’s Grove School, 931 Main St., 

Gatesville, 11000621 

Orange County 

Eno Cotton Mill, 437 Dimmocks Mill Rd., 

Hillsborough, 11000622 

Rowan County 

Christ Episcopal Church, 3430 Old US 70, 

Cleveland, 11000623 

OREGON 

Douglas County 

Mill-Pine Neighborhood Historic District 

(Boundary Decrease), Roughly bounded by 

Short St., Mosher Ave., Stephens St. and 

Rice Ave., Roseburg, 11000624 

Multnomah County 

Powers, Ira F., Warehouse and Factory, 123 

NE. 3rd Ave., Portland, 11000625 

WASHINGTON 

King County 

Liggett Building, 1424 4th Ave., Seattle, 

11000626 

Pierce County 

Skansie, Andrew & Bertha, Net Shed and 

House, 3207 Harborview Dr., Gig Harbor, 

11000627 

[FR Doc. 2011–20619 Filed 8–12–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–379 and 731– 

TA–788, 790–793; Second Review] 

Stainless Steel Plate From Belgium, 

Italy, Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

order on stainless steel plate from South 

Africa and revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on stainless 

steel plate from Belgium, Korea, South 

Africa, and Taiwan would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.2 The Commission 

further determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel plate from Italy would not be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.3

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on June 1, 2010 (75 FR 30434) 

and determined on September 7, 2010 

that it would conduct full reviews (75 

FR 59744, September 28, 2010). Notice 

of the scheduling of the Commission’s 

reviews and of a public hearing to be 

held in connection therewith was given 

by posting copies of the notice in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on 

December 27, 2010 (75 FR 81309). The 

hearing was held in Washington, DC, on 

May 26, 2011, and all persons who 

requested the opportunity were 

permitted to appear in person or by 

counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these reviews to the 

Secretary of Commerce on August 9, 

2011. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4248 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES