UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-KANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

Commission File Number 333-92047-03

---

EME Homer City Generation L.P.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Pennsylvania(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)             |  | 33-0826938(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|1750 Power Plant Road
Homer City, Pennsylvania(Address of principal executive offices) |  | 15748(Zip Code)                               
|Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(724) 479-9011                     
|Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:                           
|None                                                                                   |  | Not Applicable                                
|(Title of Class)                                                                       |  | (Name of each exchange on which registered)   

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

| |  | None             |  | 
| |  | ---------------- |  | 
| |  | (Title of Class) |  | 

---

Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES
o NO ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES
o NO ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K ý.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of "accelerated filer," "large accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

|Large accelerated filer o |  | Accelerated filer o |  | Non-accelerated filer ý |  | Smaller reporting company o
|------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO
ý

Aggregate market value of the registrant's common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2007: $0. Number of shares
outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of February 27, 2008: Not applicable.

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I.(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this
Form 10-K under the reduced disclosure format.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCENone



---



TABLE OF CONTENTS

|            |  |                                                                                                              |  | Page
|----------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|            |  | Glossary                                                                                                     |  | ii  
|PART I     
|Item 1.     |  | Business                                                                                                     |  | 1   
|Item 1A.    |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                 |  | 11  
|Item 1B.    |  | Unresolved Staff Comments                                                                                    |  | 18  
|Item 2.     |  | Properties                                                                                                   |  | 18  
|Item 3.     |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                            |  | 19  
|Item 4.     |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                          |  | 19  
|PART II    
|Item 5.     |  | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |  | 20  
|Item 6.     |  | Selected Financial Data                                                                                      |  | 21  
|Item 7.     |  | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                        |  | 22  
|Item 7A.    |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                                   |  | 57  
|Item 8.     |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                                                  |  | 58  
|Item 9.     |  | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure                         |  | 58  
|Item 9A.    |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                      |  | 58  
|Item 9A(T). |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                      |  | 59  
|Item 9B.    |  | Other Information                                                                                            |  | 59  
|PART III   
|Item 10.    |  | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance                                                       |  | 97  
|Item 11.    |  | Executive Compensation                                                                                       |  | 97  
|Item 12.    |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters               |  | 97  
|Item 13.    |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence                                    |  | 97  
|Item 14.    |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                                                       |  | 97  
|PART IV    
|Item 15.    |  | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules                                                                   |  | 99  
|            |  | Signatures                                                                                                   |  | 104 

i

---





GLOSSARY

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.

|ARO            |  | asset retirement obligations                                                                           
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Btu            |  | British thermal units                                                                                  
|CAA            |  | Clean Air Act                                                                                          
|CAIR           |  | Clean Air Interstate Rule                                                                              
|CAMR           |  | Clean Air Mercury Rule                                                                                 
|EIA            |  | Energy Information Administration                                                                      
|EME            |  | Edison Mission Energy                                                                                  
|EME Homer City |  | EME Homer City Generation L.P.                                                                         
|EMMT           |  | Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc.                                                               
|EPAct 2005     |  | Energy Policy Act of 2005                                                                              
|ERP            |  | enterprise resource planning                                                                           
|EWG(s)         |  | exempt wholesale generator(s)                                                                          
|FASB           |  | Financial Accounting Standards Board                                                                   
|FERC           |  | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission                                                                   
|FIN No. 39-1   |  | Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. 39-1, "Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39"
|FIN No. 48     |  | Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48,
"Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes"     
|Fitch          |  | Fitch Ratings                                                                                          
|FPA            |  | Federal Power Act                                                                                      
|GHG            |  | greenhouse gas                                                                                         
|GWh            |  | gigawatt-hours                                                                                         
|ISO(s)         |  | independent system operator(s)                                                                         
|kV             |  | kilovolt                                                                                               
|MD&A           |  | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations                  
|MISO           |  | Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator                                                       
|MMBtu          |  | million British thermal units                                                                          
|Moody's        |  | Moody's Investors Service, Inc.                                                                        
|MW             |  | megawatts                                                                                              
|MWh            |  | megawatt-hours                                                                                         
|NAPP           |  | Northern Appalachian                                                                                   
|NERC           |  | North American Electric Reliability Corporation                                                        
|NOx            |  | nitrogen oxide                                                                                         
|NSR            |  | New Source Review                                                                                      
|NYISO          |  | New York Independent System Operator                                                                   
|NYSEG          |  | New York State Electric & Gas Corporation                                                              
|               |  |                                                                                                        

ii

---



|PADEP        |  | Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection                                                                                                            
|------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Penelec      |  | Pennsylvania Electric Company                                                                                                                                  
|PJM          |  | PJM Interconnection, LLC                                                                                                                                       
|PUHCA 1935   |  | Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (as amended)                                                                                                        
|PUHCA 2005   |  | Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005                                                                                                                     
|RPM          |  | reliability pricing model                                                                                                                                      
|RTO(s)       |  | regional transmission organization(s)                                                                                                                          
|S&P          |  | Standard & Poor's Ratings Services                                                                                                                             
|SCR          |  | selective catalytic reduction                                                                                                                                  
|SECA(s)      |  | Seams Elimination Cost Adjustment(s)                                                                                                                           
|SFAS         |  | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards issued by the FASB                                                                                                 
|SFAS No. 133 |  | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities"                                            
|SFAS No. 155 |  | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155,
"Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments"                                                     
|SFAS No. 157 |  | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
"Fair Value Measurements"                                                                                 
|SFAS No. 158 |  | Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post-Retirement Plans"                       
|SFAS No. 159 |  | Statement of financial Accounting Standards No. 159, "Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115"
|SIP(s)       |  | state implementation plan(s)                                                                                                                                   
|SO2          |  | sulfur dioxide                                                                                                                                                 
|US EPA       |  | United States Environmental Protection Agency                                                                                                                  

iii

---





PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

The Company

EME Homer City is a Pennsylvania limited partnership with Chestnut Ridge Energy Company as a limited partner with a 99.9 percent interest and Mission
Energy Westside Inc. as a general partner with a 0.1 percent interest. Both Chestnut Ridge Energy and Mission Energy Westside are wholly owned subsidiaries of Edison Mission
Holdings Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of EME. EME is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Edison International. EME Homer City was formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and operating
three coal-fired electric generating units and related facilities located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with an aggregate capacity of 1,884 MW, which EME Homer City collectively refers to
as the "Homer City facilities," for the purpose of producing electric energy. EME Homer City acquired the Homer City facilities on March 18, 1999.

EME
Homer City derives revenue from the sale of energy, capacity and ancillary services into PJM and from bilateral contracts with power marketers and load-serving entities within PJM
and NYISO. EME Homer City has a contract with EMMT, a marketing affiliate, to sell energy, capacity and ancillary services from the Homer City facilities, which enables EMMT to engage in forward sales
and hedging transactions to manage electricity price exposure.

On
December 7, 2001, EME Homer City completed a sale-leaseback of its facilities to third-party lessors for an aggregate purchase price of $1.591 billion, made
up of $782 million in cash and the assumption of the obligations under Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s 8.137% Senior Secured Bonds due 2019 and 8.734% Senior Secured Bonds due 2026, which
EME Homer City refers to collectively as the senior secured bonds (the fair value of which was $809.3 million), which were guaranteed by EME Homer City. EME Homer City's transaction has been
accounted for as a lease financing for accounting purposes. For more information on the sale-leaseback transaction, see "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
DataNotes to Financial StatementsNote 8. Commitments and Contingencies."

EME
and Edison International each are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and have financial statements that are filed in accordance with rules enacted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. For more information regarding each of these companies, see their respective annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.

EME
Homer City's principal executive offices are located at 1750 Power Plant Road, Homer City, Pennsylvania, 15748-8009, and its telephone number is
(724) 479-9011.

EME
Homer City's Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to
those reports, are electronically filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are available on the Securities and Exchange Commission's
internet web site at http://www.sec.gov.

Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These statements reflect EME Homer City's current expectations and projections about future events based on EME Homer City's knowledge of present facts and circumstances and assumptions about
future events and include any statement that does not directly relate to a historical or current fact. Other information distributed by EME Homer City that is

1

---



incorporated
in this annual report, or that refers to or incorporates this annual report, may also contain forward-looking statements. In this annual report and elsewhere, the words "expects,"
"believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "plans," "probable," "may," "will," "could," "would," "should" and variations of such words and similar expressions, or discussions of
strategy or plans, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause results to differ, or that otherwise could impact EME Homer City, include but are not limited to:

Certain
of the risk factors listed above are discussed in more detail in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of OperationsMarket Risk Exposures." Additional information about the risk factors listed above and other risks and uncertainties is contained throughout this annual report.
Readers are urged to read this entire annual report, including the information incorporated by reference, and carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect EME Homer City's
business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of

2

---



the
date they are made, and EME Homer City is not obligated to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements. Readers should review future reports filed by EME Homer City with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Description of the Industry

Industry Overview

Historically, utilities and government-owned power agencies were the only producers of bulk electric power intended for sale to third parties in the United
States. However, the United States electric industry, including companies engaged in providing generation, transmission, distribution and ancillary services, has undergone significant deregulation
over the last three decades, which has led to increased competition. Most recently, through EPAct 2005, Congress recognized that a significant market for electric power produced by independent power
producers, such as EME Homer City, has developed in the United States and indicating that competitive wholesale electricity markets have become accepted as a fundamental aspect of the electricity
industry.

As
part of the developments discussed above, the FERC has encouraged the formation of ISOs and RTOs. In those areas where ISOs and RTOs have been formed, market participants have
expanded access to transmission service. ISOs and RTOs may also operate real-time and day-ahead energy and ancillary service markets, which are governed by
FERC-approved tariffs and market rules. The development of such organized markets into which independent power producers are able to sell has reduced their dependence on bilateral
contracts with electric utilities. See further discussion of regulations under "Regulatory MattersU.S. Federal Energy Regulation."

In
various regional markets, electricity market administrators have acknowledged that the markets for generating capacity do not provide sufficient revenues to enable existing merchant
generators to recover all of their costs or to encourage new generating capacity to be constructed. Capacity auctions have been implemented in some markets, including PJM, to address this issue. This
approach is currently expected to provide significant additional capacity revenues for independent power producers.

Power Markets

PJM

The Homer City facilities are located in the control area managed by PJM. PJM originally covered Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland, and now extends from
North Carolina to Illinois. PJM operates a wholesale spot energy market and determines the market-clearing price for each hour based on bids submitted by participating generators which indicate the
minimum prices a bidder is willing to accept to be dispatched at various incremental generation levels. PJM conducts both day-ahead and real-time energy markets. PJM's energy
markets are based on locational marginal pricing, which establishes hourly prices at specific locations throughout PJM. Locational marginal pricing is determined by considering a number of factors,
including generator bids, load requirements, transmission congestion and transmission losses. PJM requires all load-serving entities to maintain prescribed levels of capacity, including a reserve
margin, to ensure system reliability. PJM also determines the amount of capacity available from each specific generator and operates capacity markets. PJM's capacity markets have a single
market-clearing price. Load-serving entities and generators, such as EME Homer City, may participate in PJM's capacity markets or transact capacity sales on a bilateral basis.

3

---



NYISO

The NYISO was established in 1999 to operate a competitive, non-discriminatory wholesale power market in response to the FERC's Open Access Rules and
includes bid-based electricity and transmission usage markets. The market-clearing price for NYISO's day-ahead and real-time energy markets is set by supplier
generation bids and customer demand bids.

Subject
to PJM and NYISO transmission availability and reliability considerations, EME Homer City can transmit up to 1,884 MW from its generating units into NYISO and can deliver up to
1,884 MW into PJM. EME Homer City does not incur any access or wheeling charges for any energy delivered into PJM.

For
a discussion of the market risks related to EME Homer City's sale of electricity, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsMarket Risk Exposures."

Competition

EME Homer City is subject to intense competition from energy marketers, utilities, industrial companies, financial institutions, and other independent power
producers. Some of EME Homer City's competitors have a lower cost of capital than most independent power producers and, in the case of utilities, are often able to recover fixed costs through rate
base mechanisms, allowing them to build, buy and upgrade generation without relying exclusively on market clearing prices to recover their investments. These companies may also have competitive
advantages as a result of their scale and the location of their generation facilities.

For
a number of years, natural gas had been the fuel of choice for new power generation facilities for economic, operational and environmental reasons. While natural
gas-fired facilities continue to be an important part of the nation's generation portfolio, some regulated utilities are constructing units powered by renewable resources, often with
subsidies or under legislative mandate. New environmental regulations, particularly those that limit emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by electric generators, could put
coal-fired plants at a disadvantage compared with plants utilizing other fuels.

Overview of Facilities Under Lease

The Homer City facilities are located on a 2,413-acre site approximately 45 miles northeast of Pittsburgh within Indiana County, Pennsylvania. EME
Homer City owns a fee interest in the land and leases the facilities on which the generating units are located pursuant to a sale-leaseback transaction completed in December 2001. The
Homer City facilities consist of the generating units, a coal cleaning facility, water supply provided by a 1,800-acre reservoir site known as Two Lick Dam, which is not part of the
2,413-acre site, and associated support facilities. The Homer City generating units benefit from direct transmission access to both PJM and NYISO through seven high voltage lines which
interconnect through a switchyard located on the site.

The
Homer City units are coal-fired boilers and steam turbine-generator units (referred to as Units 1, 2 and 3 in this annual report). Units 1 and 2, which are essentially
identical to one another, were placed into commercial operation in 1969. Unit 1 has an installed capacity of 620 MW, and Unit 2 has an installed capacity of 614 MW. The Unit 1 and 2 boilers have been
retrofitted with low NOX burners to meet Phase I NOX 1990 CAA standards. In addition, both boilers have supplemental over-fired air

4

---



systems
to further reduce NOX emissions to satisfy Pennsylvania Title I (ozone) requirements. SCR units have been installed on Units 1 and 2 for further reduction of NOX
emissions.

Unit
3 commenced commercial operation in 1977 and has an installed capacity of 650 MW. The boiler for Unit 3 was originally constructed with low NOX burners which satisfied
Phase I NOX 1990 CAA standards, and a supplemental over-fired air system was installed in 1995 to further reduce NOX emissions. In addition, a wet scrubber
flue gas desulfurization system and a SCR system were installed on Unit 3 in 2001.

These
improvements were made to enable the Homer City generating units to comply with Phase II of Title IV of the 1990 CAA regarding SO2 emissions, the Pennsylvania
NOX allowance regulations and Pennsylvania's response to the Environmental Protection Agency's SIP Call regarding NOX emissions.

Significant Customers

During the past three fiscal years, EME Homer City derived a significant source of its operating revenues from electric power sold into the PJM market by EMMT.
Sales into PJM accounted for approximately 70%, 58% and 85% of EME Homer City's operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, EMMT also made sales to American Electric Power that accounted for approximately 11% of EME Homer City's operating revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2006, EMMT
made sales to Coral Power, LLC that accounted for approximately 21% of EME Homer City's operating revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2005, EMMT made sales to Cincinnati
Gas & Electric Company and to Constellation Power Source, Inc. that accounted for approximately 22% and 11%, respectively, of EME Homer City's operating revenues.

Fuel Supply

Units 1 and 2 typically consume approximately 3.3 million to 3.5 million tons of mid-range sulfur coal per year. Approximately 90% or
more of this coal is obtained under contracts with the remainder purchased in the spot market as needed. Two types of coal are purchased, ready to burn coal and raw coal. Ready to burn coal is of a
quality that can be burned directly in Units 1 and 2, whereas the raw coal purchased for consumption by Units 1 and 2 must be cleaned in the Homer City coal cleaning facility, which has the capacity
to clean up to 5 million tons of coal per year. The Homer City coal cleaning facility utilizes heavy media cyclones, froth flotation and spiral separators to reduce the ash and sulfur content
of the raw coal to meet both combustion and environmental requirements. The Homer City coal cleaning facility is operated by Homer City Coal Processing Corporation under a coal cleaning agreement that
expires December 31, 2010.

Unit
3 consumes approximately 2 million tons of coal per year. EME Homer City purchases the majority of its Unit 3 coal under contracts with the balance purchased in the spot
market. A wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization system for Unit 3 enables this unit to burn less expensive, higher sulfur coal, while still meeting environmental standards for emission control.

In
general, the coal purchased for all three units originates from mines that are within approximately 100 miles of the Homer City facilities. It is delivered to the station by truck and
by rail.

See
"Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesContractual Obligations,
Commitments and Contingencies," for additional discussion of contractual commitments related to EME Homer City's fuel supply and coal transportation contracts.

5

---



Emission Allowances

Certain state and federal environmental laws require power plant operators to hold or obtain emission allowances equal, on an annual basis, to their plants'
emissions of SO2 and, on a seasonal basis, to their plants' emissions of NOX. Emission allowances were acquired as part of the acquisition of the Homer City facilities.
Additional emission allowances are purchased by EME Homer City when operations make this necessary and are sold by EME Homer City when it has more than needed for planned levels of operation.

See
"Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters
and Regulations" for a discussion of environmental regulations related to emissions. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsMarket Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskEmission Allowances Price Risk" for a discussion of price risks related to the purchase or sale of emission
allowances.

Transmission and Interconnection

Existing transmission lines leaving the Homer City generating units are interconnected with both PJM and NYISO. EME Homer City is able to transmit full plant
output into PJM through an 85-mile 345 kV line and 34-mile, 19-mile and 15-mile 230 kV lines owned by Penelec, an affiliate of FirstEnergy Corp. Subject
to PJM transmission availability and reliability considerations, EME Homer City has the ability to transmit full plant output into NYISO through 345 kV lines owned by NYSEG. In addition, a
13-mile 230 kV line from the Homer City generating units provides an indirect interconnection to the East Central Area reliability market.

The
points of interconnection with the Homer City units include:



The
ownership of the transmission and distribution assets for the Homer City facilities, including the site switchyard, substation and support equipment, remained with Penelec and NYSEG
following EME Homer City's acquisition of the facilities. These companies entered into an interconnection agreement with EME Homer City's general partner, Mission Energy Westside, which provides EME
Homer City with all services necessary to interconnect its generating units with their transmission systems, other than services provided under existing tariffs. Unless terminated earlier in
accordance with its terms, the interconnection agreement will terminate on a date mutually agreed to by Mission Energy Westside, NYSEG and Penelec. This date will not exceed the retirement date of the
Homer City units. NYSEG and Penelec have agreed to extend such interconnection services (but not the expiration of the agreement) to modifications, additions, upgrades or repowering of the Homer City
units. Mission Energy Westside is required to compensate NYSEG and Penelec for all reasonable costs associated with any modifications, additions or replacements made to NYSEG or Penelec's
interconnection facilities or transmission systems in connection with any modification, addition, upgrade or repowering of the Homer City units.

6

---



Water Supply and Other Support Facilities

The Homer City generating units receive their water supply from Two Lick Creek. The water supply to Two Lick Creek is regulated by releases from Two Lick Dam,
which is located approximately eight miles upstream from the Homer City facilities and is owned, operated and maintained by EME Homer City in accordance with a dam safety permit and a drought
management plan and related consent order and agreement with the PADEP. These facilities were not sold to third parties as part of the 2001 sale-leaseback transaction. Each of the Homer
City generating units has a natural draft-cooling tower. A portion of the waste heat in the water leaving the units' condensers is diverted from these towers to a 14-acre polyethylene
roofed greenhouse complex located adjacent to the Homer City units. After the water passes through this greenhouse complex, it is returned to the basin of the cooling towers for reuse.

Other
support facilities located on the site include an ash disposal area, a coal refuse disposal area, coal receiving and storage facilities and water treatment and pumping facilities.

Insurance

EME Homer City maintains insurance policies that are comparable to those carried by other electric generating facilities of similar size. The insurance program
includes all-risk real and
personal property insurance, including coverage for losses from boiler and machinery breakdowns, and the perils of earthquake and flood, subject to certain sublimits. The property insurance program
currently covers losses up to $1.25 billion. Under the terms of the participation agreements entered into as part of EME Homer City's sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City is
required to maintain specified minimum insurance coverages if and to the extent that such insurance is available on a commercially reasonable basis. Although the insurance covering the Homer City
facilities is comparable to insurance coverages normally carried by companies engaged in similar businesses, and owning similar properties, the insurance coverages that are in place do not meet the
minimum insurance coverages required under the participation agreements. Due to the current market environment, the minimum insurance coverage is not commercially available at reasonable prices. EME
Homer City has obtained a waiver under the participation agreements which permits it to maintain its current insurance coverage through June 1, 2008.

EME
Homer City also carries general liability insurance covering liabilities to third parties for bodily injury or property damage resulting from operations, automobile liability
insurance and excess liability insurance. Limits and deductibles in respect of these insurance policies are consistent with the requirements of the participation agreements.

Seasonality

Due to higher electric demand resulting from warmer weather during the summer months and cold weather during the winter months, electric revenues from the Homer
City facilities vary substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, maintenance outages generally are scheduled during periods of lower projected electric demand (spring and fall) further reducing
generation and increasing major maintenance costs which are recorded as an expense when incurred. Accordingly, earnings from the Homer City facilities are seasonal and have significant variability
from quarter to quarter. Seasonal fluctuations may also be affected by changes in market prices. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsMarket Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskEnergy Price Risk" for further discussion regarding market prices.

7

---



Regulatory Matters

General

EME Homer City's operations are subject to extensive regulation by government agencies. Federal laws and regulations govern, among other things, transactions by
and with purchasers of power, including utility companies, the operations of a power plant and the ownership of a power plant. Under limited circumstances where exclusive federal jurisdiction is not
applicable or specific exemptions or waivers from state or federal laws or regulations are otherwise unavailable, federal and/or state utility regulatory commissions may have broad jurisdiction over
non-utility owned electric power plants. Energy-producing projects are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern the geographical location, zoning land use
and operation of a project. Federal, state and local environmental requirements generally require that a wide variety of permits and other approvals be obtained before the commencement of construction
or operation of an energy-producing facility and that the facility then operate in compliance with these permits and approvals. In addition, EME Homer City is subject to the market rules, procedures,
and protocols of the markets in which it participates.

EME
Homer City is subject to a varied and complex body of laws and regulations that are in a state of flux. Intricate and changing environmental and other regulatory requirements could
necessitate substantial expenditures and could create a significant risk of expensive delays or significant loss of value in a power plant if EME Homer City were to become unable to function as
planned due to changing requirements or local opposition.

U.S. Federal Energy Regulation

The FERC has ratemaking jurisdiction and other authority with respect to interstate wholesale sales and transmission of electric energy (other than transmission
that is "bundled" with retail sales) under the FPA and with respect to certain interstate sales, transportation and storage of natural gas under the Natural Gas Act of 1938. The passage of the Energy
Policy Act in 1992 further encouraged independent power production by providing additional exemptions from PUHCA 1935 for EWGs such as EME Homer City.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005

A comprehensive energy bill was enacted in August 2005. Known as "EPAct 2005," this comprehensive legislation included provisions for the repeal of PUHCA
1935, amendments to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), merger review reform, the introduction of new regulations regarding transmission operation improvements, FERC authority
to impose civil penalties for violation of its regulations, transmission rate reform and incentives for various generation technologies. The FERC finalized rules to implement the congressionally
mandated repeal of PUHCA 1935, effective February 8, 2006, and the enactment of PUHCA 2005. PUHCA 2005 is primarily a "books and records access"
statute and does not give the FERC any new substantive authority under the FPA or Natural Gas Act. The FERC has also issued final rules to implement the electric company merger and acquisition
provisions of EPAct 2005.

On
July 20, 2006, the FERC certified the NERC as its Electric Reliability Organization to establish and enforce reliability standards for the bulk power system. On
March 16, 2007, the FERC issued a final rule approving 83 reliability standards proposed by the NERC. The final rule became effective, and compliance with these standards became mandatory, on
June 18, 2007. EME believes it has taken all steps to be compliant with current NERC reliability standards that apply to generators.

8

---



Federal Power Act

The FPA grants the FERC exclusive jurisdiction over the rates, terms and conditions of wholesale sales of electricity and transmission services in interstate
commerce (other than transmission that is "bundled" with retail sales), including ongoing, as well as initial, rate jurisdiction. This jurisdiction allows the FERC to revoke or modify previously
approved rates after notice and opportunity for hearing. These rates may be based on a cost-of-service approach or, in geographic and product markets determined by the FERC to
be workably competitive, may be market based.

EWGs
certified in accordance with the FERC's rules under PUHCA 2005 and other non-qualifying facility independent power projects are subject to the FPA and to the FERC's
ratemaking jurisdiction thereunder, but the FERC typically grants EWGs the authority to charge market-based rates to purchasers which are not affiliated electric utility companies as long as the
absence of market power is shown. On March 12, 1999, the general counsel of the FERC issued a letter determining that, based on the facts stated in EME Homer City's application for EWG status,
EME Homer City is an EWG.

EME
Homer City is authorized by the FERC to make wholesale market sales of power at market-based rates and is subject to the FERC ratemaking regulation under the FPA. The FERC's order,
as is customary with market-based rate schedules, reserves the right to revoke EME Homer City's market-based rate authority on a prospective basis if it is subsequently determined that EME Homer City
or any of its affiliates possess excessive market power. If the FERC were to revoke EME Homer City's market-based rate authority, it would be necessary for EME Homer City to file, and obtain the
FERC's acceptance of, EME Homer City's rate schedule as a cost-of-service rate schedule. In addition, the loss of market-based rate authority would subject EME Homer City to
the accounting, record keeping and reporting requirements that are imposed on utilities with
cost-based rate schedules. If EME Homer City were to lose its EWG status, defaults under the covenants in EME Homer City's agreements could be triggered.

The
FPA grants the FERC jurisdiction over the sale or transfer of jurisdictional assets, including wholesale power sales contracts and generation facilities, and in some cases,
jurisdiction over the issuance of securities or the assumption of specified liabilities and some interlocking directorates. In granting authority to make sales at market-based rates, the FERC
typically also grants blanket approval for certain obligations, such as those related to the issuance of securities. However, dispositions of EME Homer City's jurisdictional assets or certain types of
financing arrangements may require FERC approval.

State Energy Regulation

Overview

State public utility commissions have broad jurisdiction over non-qualifying facility independent power projects, including EWGs, which are considered
public utilities in many states. This jurisdiction can include the issuance of certificates of public convenience and necessity and/or other certifications to construct, own and operate a facility,
engage in retail energy sales, as well as the regulation of organizational, accounting, financial and other corporate matters on an ongoing basis. Some states that have restructured their electric
industries require generators to register to provide electric service to customers. Many states are currently undergoing significant changes in their electric statutory and regulatory frameworks that
result from restructuring the electric industries that may affect generators in those states. Although the FERC generally has exclusive jurisdiction over the rates charged by a
non-qualifying facility independent power project to its wholesale customers, a state's public utility

9

---



commission
has the ability, in practice, to influence the establishment of these rates by asserting jurisdiction over a purchasing utility's ability to pass the resulting cost of purchased power
through to its retail customers. In addition, states may assert jurisdiction over the siting and construction of independent power projects and, among other things, the issuance of securities, related
party transactions and the sale or other transfer of assets by these facilities. The actual scope of jurisdiction over independent power projects by state public utility commissions varies from state
to state. Although state public utility commissions do not have any jurisdiction to modify the terms of wholesale power sales, EME Homer City cannot provide assurance that its power sales contracts
will not be subject to adverse consequences as a result of regulatory actions by a state commission, even though it sells power exclusively at wholesale.

Pennsylvania

Under the Pennsylvania Public Utility Law, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission regulates all public utilities operating in Pennsylvania. A "public utility"
under this law includes any entity that owns or operates equipment or facilities for the production, generation, transmission or distribution of gas, electricity or steam for the production of light,
heat or power to the public for consumption. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Law does not specifically address the utility status of entities selling electricity at wholesale within Pennsylvania.
Because EME Homer City sells electricity exclusively in the wholesale market and does not hold itself out to the public generally as a supplier of utility service, EME Homer City is not likely to be
regulated as a public utility under the Pennsylvania Public Utility Law. If, however, EME Homer City were deemed to be a Pennsylvania public utility, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission could
retroactively apply several provisions of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Law to EME Homer City. One of those provisions requires every public utility to obtain a certificate of public convenience and
necessity from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission prior to rendering service as a public utility. If the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission were to require EME Homer City to obtain a
certificate of public convenience and necessity, EME Homer City might be required to
discontinue operation of its units pending application for, and receipt of, this certificate. Another provision requires every public utility to obtain Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission approval
before it issues or guarantees securities. If EME Homer City were found to be a public utility, its failure to have obtained this approval could call into question the validity of its obligations
under the documents entered into in connection with the sale-leaseback. In addition, EME Homer City would then be subject to other laws and regulations applicable to Pennsylvania public
utilities, except for rate regulation. EME Homer City's rates would remain subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC.

New York

Under the New York Public Service Law, the New York Public Service Commission regulates all public utility companies or utility companies operating in New York. A
public utility company or utility company under the New York Public Service Law includes, among other things, any entity engaged in the production, transmission or distribution of electricity to the
public for light, heat or power purposes. EME Homer City, as an EWG, does not provide electricity directly to the public, but instead sells only to power marketers and energy service companies.
Although the New York Public Service Law is silent with respect to the utility status of electric corporations selling electricity wholesale within New York, EME Homer City will not likely be subject
to regulation as a New York public utility. If, however, EME Homer City were deemed to be a public utility under the New York Public Service Law, the New York Public Service Commission could
retroactively apply specified provisions of the statute to EME Homer City. In addition, EME Homer City would then be subject to other laws and regulations applicable to New York public utility
companies, except for rate regulation. EME Homer City's rates would remain subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC.

10

---



Transmission of Wholesale Power

EME Homer City utilizes power lines owned by others for the transmission of electricity. The prices and other terms and conditions of transmission contracts are
regulated by the FERC when the entity providing the transmission service is a jurisdictional public utility under the FPA, Order No. 2000, and subsequent orders.

The
Energy Policy Act of 1992 laid the groundwork for a competitive wholesale market for electricity by, among other things, expanding the FERC's authority to order electric utilities to
transmit third-party electricity over their transmission lines, thus allowing qualifying facilities under PURPA, power marketers and those qualifying as EWGs under PUHCA 1935, such as EME Homer City,
to more effectively
compete in the wholesale market. See "Regulatory MattersU.S. Federal Energy Regulation" for further detail on legislative developments.

PJM Matters

On June 1, 2007, PJM implemented the RPM for capacity. The purpose of the RPM is to provide a long-term pricing signal for capacity resources.
The RPM provides a mechanism for PJM to satisfy the region's need for generation capacity, the cost of which is allocated to load-serving entities through a locational reliability charge.
Also on June 1, 2007, PJM implemented marginal losses for transmission for its competitive wholesale electric market. For further discussion regarding the RPM and recent auctions, see
"Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMarket Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskCapacity Price
Risk."

Environmental Matters and Regulations

See the discussion on environmental matters and regulations in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters and Regulations."

Employees

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City employed 260 employees, approximately 189 of whom are covered by a collective bargaining agreement governing wages,
benefits and working conditions. This collective bargaining agreement will expire on December 31, 2012.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

EME Homer City's ability to make payments of lease rent under the facility leases is subject to market risks related to wholesale energy prices.

EME Homer City's ability to make payments of lease rent on the facility leases is dependent on revenues generated by the Homer City facilities, which depend on
the facilities' performance level and on market conditions for the sale of capacity and energy.

The
Homer City facilities derive revenues from the sale of energy and capacity into PJM and from bilateral contracts with power marketers and load-serving entities within PJM, NYISO and
the surrounding markets. Participants in PJM and NYISO are not guaranteed any specified rate of return on their capital investments through recovery of mandated rates payable by purchasers of
electricity. Therefore, with the exception of nominal revenue, EME Homer City's revenues and results of operations

11

---



are
dependent upon prevailing market prices for energy, capacity and ancillary services. The factors that influence the market prices for these products in PJM and NYISO include:

In
addition, unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, the wholesale
power markets are subject to significant and unpredictable price fluctuations over relatively short periods of time.

There
is no assurance that EME Homer City will be successful in selling power into its markets or that the prices received for its power will generate positive cash flow. If EME Homer
City's operations do not meet these objectives, it may not be able to generate enough cash to service its own debt and lease obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on EME Homer City.
See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMarket Risk Exposures."

EME Homer City's financial results can be affected by changes in fuel prices, fuel transportation cost increases, and interruptions in fuel supply.

EME Homer City's business is subject to changes in fuel costs, which may negatively affect its financial results and financial position by increasing the cost of
producing power. The fuel markets can be volatile, and actual fuel prices can differ from EME Homer City's expectations.

Although
EME Homer City attempts to purchase fuel based on its known fuel requirements, it is still subject to the risks of supply interruptions, transportation cost increases, and fuel
price volatility. In addition, fuel deliveries may not exactly match energy sales, due in part to the need to purchase fuel inventories in advance for reliability and dispatch requirements. The price
at which EME Homer City can sell its energy may not rise or fall at the same rate as a corresponding rise or fall in fuel costs. See

12

---



"Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMarket Risk ExposuresCommodity Price Risk."

EME Homer City may not be able to hedge market risks effectively.

EME Homer City is exposed to market risks through its operation of the Homer City facilities. These market risks include, among others, volatility arising from
the timing differences associated with buying fuel, converting fuel into energy and delivering energy to a buyer. Through EMMT, EME Homer City uses forward contracts and derivative financial
instruments, such as futures contracts and options, to manage market risks and exposure to fluctuating electricity and fuel prices. However, EME Homer City cannot provide assurance that these
strategies will successfully mitigate market risks, or that they will not result in net losses.

EME
Homer City may not cover the entire exposure of its assets or positions to market price volatility, and the level of coverage will vary over time. Fluctuating commodity prices may
negatively affect EME Homer City's financial results to the extent that assets and positions have not been hedged.

The
effectiveness of EME Homer City's hedging activities may depend on the amount of working capital available to post as collateral in support of these transactions, either in support
of performance guarantees or as a cash margin. The amount of credit support that must be provided typically is based on the difference between the price of the commodity in a given contract and the
market price of the commodity. Significant movements in market prices can result in a requirement to provide cash collateral
and letters of credit in very large amounts. Without adequate liquidity to meet margin and collateral requirements, EME Homer City could be exposed to the following:

As
a result of these and other factors, EME Homer City cannot predict with precision the effect that risk management decisions may have on its business, operating results or financial
position.

EME Homer City is exposed to credit and performance risk from third parties under supply and transportation contracts.

The Homer City facilities rely on contracts for the supply and transportation of fuel and other services required for their operation. EME Homer City's operations
are exposed to the risk that counterparties will not perform their obligations. If a counterparty failed to perform under a contract, EME Homer City would need to obtain alternate suppliers or
alternate means of transportation for its requirements of fuel or other services, which could result in higher costs or disruptions in its operations. Furthermore, EME Homer City is exposed to credit
risk because damages related to a breach of contract may not be recoverable. Accordingly, the failure of a supplier to fulfill its contractual obligations could have a material adverse effect on EME
Homer City's financial results.

EME Homer City is subject to extensive energy industry regulation.

EME Homer City's operations are subject to extensive regulation by governmental agencies. Federal laws and regulations govern, among other things, transactions by
and with purchasers of power, including

13

---



utility
companies, the development and construction of generation facilities, the ownership and operations of generation facilities, and access to transmission. Under limited circumstances where
exclusive federal jurisdiction is not applicable or specific exemptions or waivers from state or federal laws or regulations are otherwise unavailable, federal and/or state utility regulatory
commissions may have broad jurisdiction over non-utility owned electric power plants such as the Homer City facilities. Generation facilities are also subject to federal, state and local
laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the geographical location, zoning, land use and operation of a project.

In
addition to its exposure to government regulation affecting all electric power suppliers and generating companies on a national level, EME Homer City is especially susceptible to
regulatory actions and litigation outcomes that are specific to the geographic power market in which the Homer City facilities are located. For example, the FERC may impose various forms of market
mitigation measures, including price caps and operating restrictions, where it determines that potential market power might exist and that the public interest requires mitigation. In addition, ISOs
and RTOs may impose bidding and scheduling rules, both to curb the potential exercise of market power and to facilitate market functions. Such actions may materially affect EME Homer City's results of
operations.

There
is no assurance that the introduction of new laws or other future regulatory developments will not have a material adverse effect on EME Homer City's business, results of
operations or financial condition, nor is there any assurance that EME Homer City will be able to obtain and comply with all necessary licenses, permits and approvals for its facilities. If EME Homer
City cannot comply with all applicable regulations, its business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

EME Homer City is subject to extensive environmental regulation and permitting requirements that may involve significant and increasing costs.

EME Homer City's operations are subject to extensive environmental regulations with respect to, among other things, air quality, water quality, waste disposal,
and noise. EME Homer City is required to obtain, and comply with conditions established by, licenses, permits and other approvals in order to construct, operate or modify its facilities. Failure to
comply with these requirements could subject EME Homer City to civil or criminal liability, the imposition of liens or fines, or actions by regulatory agencies
seeking to curtail EME Homer City's operations. EME Homer City may also be exposed to risks arising from past, current or future contamination at its facilities or with respect to off-site
waste disposal sites that have been used in its operations.

EME
Homer City devotes significant resources to environmental monitoring, pollution control equipment and emission allowances to comply with environmental regulatory requirements. EME
Homer City believes that it is currently in substantial compliance with environmental regulatory requirements. However, the current trend is toward more stringent standards, stricter regulation, and
more expansive application of environmental regulations. Environmental advocacy groups and regulatory agencies in the United States have been focusing considerable attention on carbon dioxide
emissions from coal-fired power plants and their potential role in climate change. The adoption of laws and regulations to implement carbon dioxide controls could adversely affect the
Homer City facilities. Also, coal plant emissions of NOX and SO2, mercury and particulates are subject to increased controls and mitigation expenses under current regulations
and may be subject to new, possibly stricter, regulation in the future. The continued operation of the Homer City facilities will likely require substantial capital expenditures for environmental
controls.

14

---



In
addition, future environmental laws and regulations, and future enforcement proceedings that may be taken by environmental authorities could affect the costs and the manner in which
EME Homer City conducts its business. There is no assurance that EME Homer City would be able to recover these increased costs from its customers or that its business, financial condition and results
of operations would not be materially adversely affected. Changing environmental regulations could require EME Homer City to purchase additional emission allowances or install additional pollution
control technology, and could make some units uneconomical to maintain or operate. If EME Homer City cannot comply with all applicable regulations, it could be required to retire or suspend operations
at its facilities, or restrict or modify the operations of its facilities, and its business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. See "Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters and Regulations."

Typically,
environmental laws require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits and approvals prior to construction, operation or modification of a project or
generating facility. Meeting all the necessary requirements can delay or sometimes prevent the completion of a proposed project as well as require extensive modifications to existing projects, which
may involve significant capital expenditures. EME Homer City cannot provide assurance that it will be able to obtain and comply with all necessary licenses, permits and approvals for the Homer City
facilities.

Competition could adversely affect EME Homer City's business.

The independent power industry is characterized by numerous capable competitors, some of whom may have more extensive operating experience in the acquisition and
development of power projects, larger staffs, and greater financial resources than EME Homer City. Several participants in the wholesale markets, including many regulated utilities, have a lower cost
of capital than most merchant generators and often are able to recover fixed costs through rate base mechanisms, allowing them to build, buy and upgrade generation assets without relying exclusively
on market clearing prices to recover their investments. This could affect EME Homer City's ability to compete effectively in the markets in which those entities operate.

Further,
in recent years some power markets, including PJM and NYISO, have been characterized by strong and increasing competition as a result of regulatory changes and other factors
which can contribute to a reduction in market prices for power from time to time. These regulatory and other changes may increase competitive pressures in these markets.

Newer
plants owned by EME Homer City's competitors are often more efficient than the Homer City facilities. This may put the Homer City facilities at a competitive disadvantage to the
extent that its competitors are able to produce more power from each increment of fuel than the Homer City facilities are capable of producing. Over time, the Homer City facilities may become obsolete
in their markets, or be unable to compete, because of the construction of newer, more efficient power plants.

EME Homer City may not be able to raise capital on favorable terms, to refinance existing indebtedness or to fund operations and capital expenditures,
which could adversely affect its results of operations.

The factors that influence EME Homer City's ability to arrange for financing and its costs of capital include:

15

---



Recent
disruptions in the credit markets have impacted the availability of credit, cost of borrowing, and terms and conditions of new borrowings. EME Homer City cannot provide assurance
that its projected sources of capital will be available when needed or that its actual cash requirements will not be greater than expected.

Restrictions in the participation agreements and facility leases limit or prohibit EME Homer City from entering into some transactions that it otherwise
might enter into.

Under the participation agreements entered into as part of the sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City's ability to enter into specified
transactions and to engage in specified business activities, including financing and investment activities, is subject to significant restrictions. These restrictions could affect, and in some cases
significantly limit or prohibit, its ability to, among other things, merge, consolidate or sell its assets, create liens on its properties or assets, enter into non-permitted trading
activities, enter into transactions with its affiliates, incur indebtedness, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist guarantees or contingent obligations, make restricted payments to its partners,
make capital expenditures, own subsidiaries, liquidate or dissolve, engage in non-permitted business activities, sublease its leasehold interests in the facilities or make improvements to
the facilities. Accordingly, EME Homer City's liquidity is substantially based on its ability to generate cash flow from operations. If EME Homer City is unable to generate cash flow from operations
necessary to meet its obligations, EME Homer City will have limited ability to obtain additional capital on attractive terms and conditions, unless its partners provide funding, which they are under
no legal obligation to do.

In
connection with the sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City entered into a designated account representative agreement with the owner lessors which provides that, for
as long as the facility leases are in effect, EME Homer City will be irrevocably able to appoint the designated account representatives on file with the US EPA or the PADEP, as the case may be,
entitled to buy, sell
and otherwise dispose of emission allowances without any payments or consideration to the owner lessors. The agreement provides that upon termination of a facility lease, the applicable owner lessor
will have the right to appoint itself or any other person as EME Homer City's successor designated account representative for purposes of any future emission allowances not then owned by EME Homer
City. If a facility lease were to terminate before its expiration, this event would also terminate the account representative agreement, and EME Homer City would be required to write-off
any unamortized emission allowances that it would no longer control.

Restrictions in the financing documents binding on EME Homer City and its affiliates limit the ability of EME Homer City to enter into specified
transactions that it otherwise might enter into.

EME has entered into debt agreements that contain restrictive covenants that are applicable to their subsidiaries, including EME Homer City. EME Homer City's
sale-leaseback documents also contain financial and investment covenants. These restrictions may significantly impede the ability of EME Homer City to take advantage of business
opportunities as they arise, to grow its business or compete effectively, to make capital expenditures when required, or to develop and implement any refinancing plans in respect of its indebtedness.

16

---



In
addition, in connection with the entry by EME Homer City or its affiliates into new financings or amendments to existing financing arrangements, EME Homer City's financial and
operational flexibility may be further reduced as a result of more restrictive covenants, requirements for security and other terms that are often imposed on sub-investment grade entities.

The Homer City facilities may be affected by general operating risks and hazards customary in the power generation industry. EME Homer City may not have
adequate insurance to cover all these hazards.

The operation of power generation facilities involves many operating risks, including:

These
and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment, contamination of or damage to the
environment, and suspension of operations. The occurrence of one or more of the events listed above could decrease or eliminate revenues generated by the Homer City facilities or significantly
increase the costs of operating them, and could also result in EME Homer City's being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for substantial damages, potentially including environmental
cleanup costs, personal injury, property damage, fines and penalties. Equipment and plant warranties, guarantees and insurance may not be sufficient or effective under all circumstances to cover lost
revenues or increased expenses. A decrease or elimination in revenues generated by the facilities or an increase in the costs of operating them could decrease or eliminate funds available to make
lease rent payments and could have a material adverse effect on EME Homer City.

EME
Homer City is required to have insurance for the facilities, including all-risk property damage insurance, commercial general public liability insurance, boiler and
machinery coverage and business interruption insurance. EME Homer City cannot provide assurance that the insurance coverage for the facilities will be available in the future on commercially
reasonable terms. EME Homer City also cannot provide assurance that the insurance proceeds received for any loss of the facilities or any damage to the facilities will be sufficient to permit EME
Homer City to make any payments of rent under the facility leases.

Due
to the current market environment, the minimum insurance coverage specified under the EME Homer City sale-leaseback documents is not commercially available at reasonable
prices. EME Homer City has obtained a waiver under the participation agreements that permits it to maintain its current

17

---



insurance
coverage through June 1, 2008. Failure to maintain insurance pursuant to the sale-leaseback documents, absent a waiver, could result in an event of default under the
documents, which could have a material adverse effect on EME Homer City. For more information on the insurance maintained by EME Homer City, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesContractual Obligations, Commitments and ContingenciesContingencies."

The accounting for EME Homer City's hedging activities may increase the volatility of its quarterly and annual financial results.

EMMT, on behalf of EME Homer City, engages in hedging activities in order to mitigate EME Homer City's exposure to market risk with respect to electricity sales
from its generation facilities, fuel utilized by those facilities and emissions allowances. EMMT generally attempts to balance its fixed-price physical and financial purchases and sales commitments in
terms of contract volumes and the timing of performance and delivery obligations through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts. These derivative contracts are recorded on EME Homer
City's balance sheet at fair value pursuant to SFAS No. 133. Some of these derivative contracts do not qualify under SFAS No. 133 for hedge accounting, and changes in their fair value
are therefore recognized currently in earnings as unrealized gains or losses. As a result, EME Homer City's financial results, including gross margin, operating income and balance sheet ratios, will
at times be volatile and subject to fluctuations in value primarily due to changes in electricity and fuel prices. For a more detailed discussion of the accounting treatment of EME Homer City's
hedging activities, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMarket Risk ExposuresAccounting for Energy
Contracts."

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Inapplicable.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

EME Homer City owns a fee interest in the 2,413-acre site on which its generating units and the other facilities are located, as well as another
approximately 1,800 acres associated with the Two Lick Dam area. The site is approximately 45 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in Indiana County. As a result of the
sale-leaseback transaction on December 7, 2001, EME Homer City leased the property on which the generating units are located to the owner lessors through site leases and each owner
lessor in turn subleased its undivided ground interest in the property back to EME Homer City through site subleases. The term of the site leases is 45 years from the date of the
sale-leaseback, with specified renewal options. The term of the site subleases is 33.67 years, the term of the sale-leaseback financing, and is renewable upon renewal of
the EME Homer City facility leases. As long as the facility leases and the site subleases are in effect, the rents payable under the site leases and under the site subleases will be automatically
offset against each other so that no amounts will be payable by EME Homer City or the owner lessors with respect to these agreements. EME Homer City acquired a 116-acre parcel of land in
2007 to support future rail coal deliveries and provide future coal transportation opportunities from competing rail services. EME Homer City also leases portions of its sites to other third parties.
Some of those leases are described below.

EME
Homer City leases the surface of an approximately 14-acre parcel to Alpha Coal Sales Company, LLC upon which the coal blending facility is located. Alpha Coal,
using Unit Mix as an operator, blends various coals mined by Alpha and others for sale to EME Homer City. EME Homer

18

---



City
also leases an office building located on the site to Unit Mix, which Unit Mix uses for administrative activities associated with the coal blending facility. Each of the leases expires no later
than June 30, 2009.

EME
Homer City entered into a Lease Agreement with Linn Operating LLC for access to the deep natural gas within the site, which provides Linn the right to operate and produce gas
from existing wells located on the site, and to drill new wells on the site, spacing permitting, provided that gas is found in
paying quantities. EME Homer City receives 18% of the market value of the gas at the wellhead as royalties. The lease expires on February 1, 2012.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No material legal proceedings are presently pending against EME Homer City.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Inapplicable.

19

---





PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

All the partners' equity of EME Homer City is, as of the date hereof, owned by Mission Energy Westside Inc. and Chestnut Ridge Energy Company. There is no
market for EME Homer City's partnership interests.

Dividends
will be paid when declared by EME Homer City's general partner. No cash dividends were paid by EME Homer City during 2007, 2006 or 2005.

20

---



ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data was derived from EME Homer City's audited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by the more
detailed information and financial statements, including notes to these financial statements, included in this annual report.

|                                                         |  | Years Ended December 31, |         
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------
|
|
|INCOME STATEMENT DATA                                    |  |                          |         
|Operating revenues                                       |  | $                        | 763,747 
|Operating expenses                                       |  |                          | 490,811 
|                                                         |  |                          |         
|Operating income                                         |  |                          | 272,936 
|Interest and other income                                |  |                          | 8,978   
|Interest expense                                         |  |                          | (139,342
|                                                         |  |                          |         
|Income (loss) before income taxes                        |  |                          | 142,572 
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                     |  |                          | 54,441  
|                                                         |  |                          |         
|Income (loss) before accounting change                   |  |                          | 88,131  
|Cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of tax(1) |  |                          |        
|                                                         |  |                          |         
|Net income (loss)                                        |  | $                        | 88,131  
|                                                         |  |                          |         

---

|                             |  | As of December 31,
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------
|
|
|BALANCE SHEET DATA           |  |                   
|Assets                       |  | $                 
|Current liabilities          |  |                   
|Long-term debt to affiliates |  |                   
|Lease financing              |  |                   
|Other long-term obligations  |  |                   
|Partners' equity (deficit)   |  |                   

|                                                |  | Years Ended December 31, |         
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------
|
|
|CASH FLOW DATA                                  |  |                          |         
|Cash provided by operating activities           |  | $                        | 152,269 
|Cash used in financing activities               |  |                          | (122,225
|Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |  |                          | (1,511  

21

---





ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This MD&A contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements reflect EME Homer City's current expectations and projections about future events based on EME Homer City's knowledge of present facts and circumstances and assumptions about future events
and include any statement that does not directly relate to a historical or current fact. Other information distributed by EME Homer City that is incorporated in this MD&A, or that refers to or
incorporates this MD&A, may also contain forward-looking statements. In this MD&A and elsewhere, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "plans,"
"probable," "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," and variations of such words and similar expressions, or discussions of strategy or plans, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Such statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. See "Item 1. BusinessForward-Looking
Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" for a discussion of some of the risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause results to differ, or otherwise could impact EME Homer
City. Additional information about the risks and uncertainties is contained throughout this MD&A. Readers are urged to read this entire annual report, including the information incorporated by
reference, and carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect EME Homer City's business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and EME Homer
City is not obligated to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements. Readers should review future reports filed by EME Homer City with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

This
MD&A presents a discussion of EME Homer City's financial results and analysis of its financial condition. It is presented in four sections:

PageManagement's Overview; Critical Accounting Policies

22Results of Operations

27Liquidity and Capital Resources

34Market Risk Exposures

48


MANAGEMENT'S OVERVIEW; CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management's Overview

Introduction

EME Homer City is a Pennsylvania limited partnership formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and operating three coal-fired electric generating
units and related facilities located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with an aggregate capacity of 1,884 MW. EME Homer City does not have any plans to purchase or develop new power plants at this time.
In December 2001, EME Homer City completed a sale-leaseback transaction of the Homer City facilities to third-party lessors. The sale-leaseback transaction is accounted for as
a lease financing for financial reporting purposes.

The
Homer City facilities are located in the control area managed by PJM. The energy and capacity from the Homer City facilities are sold under terms, including price and quantity,
arranged by EMMT, on behalf of EME Homer City, to customers through a combination of bilateral agreements, forward energy sales and spot market sales. See "Market Risk Exposures" for further
discussion of forward market prices.

22

---



Significant Industry Developments

Environmental Regulations Affecting Coal Plants

Federal environmental regulations currently require power plants to reduce emissions during 2009 and require states to adopt implementation plans that are equal
to or more stringent than the federal requirements. Compliance with these regulations and SIPs could require substantial additional capital expenditures or closure of coal-fired power
plants. During 2007, EME Homer City commenced activities to install activated carbon injection technology to reduce mercury emissions at its facilities. EME Homer City will be subject to the federal
CAIR rule during 2009 and expects to be able to comply with the NOX requirement using its existing SCR system. The Pennsylvania CAIR, including both NOx and SO2
limits, is expected to become effective in 2010, at which time EME Homer City expects to purchase SO2 allowances. See "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters and
RegulationsAir Quality RegulationClean Air Interstate Rule" for further discussion.

The
U.S. Congressional leadership has made climate change legislation a priority, and enactment of climate change legislation within the next several years may occur. While debate
continues at the national level over domestic climate policy and the appropriate scope and terms of any federal legislation, many states are developing state-specific measures or participating in
regional legislative initiatives to reduce GHG emissions. State regulations may vary and may be more stringent and costly than federal legislative proposals currently being debated in Congress. Key
uncertainties are whether a cap-and-trade program will be implemented similar to the US EPA acid rain program, and, if implemented, whether emission allowances would be
provided to impacted parties without cost for a period of time. Furthermore, the rate of decrease in GHG emissions and the cost to purchase allowances would be significant factors in determining
whether environmental controls would be economic to install. The potential impact to power generators, like EME Homer City, will depend upon how these factors and many other considerations are
resolved.

Regulatory Developments on New Capacity

In NERC's 2007 Long-Term Reliability Assessment (2007-2016), the forecasted peak demand of electricity in certain regions of the United
States will exceed projected committed resources in such regions, resulting in declining reserve margins for capacity. Additional resources that are not currently committed will be needed to maintain
system reliability. In PJM, long-term resource planning has been incorporated into its market structure through a new forward capacity market, referred to as RPM. During 2007 and January
2008, PJM completed capacity auctions under the PJM RPM for periods through May 31, 2011. EMMT participated in each auction, which sold forward significant capacity at prices from $40.80 per
MW-day to $191.32 per MW-day. The increase in capacity prices determined through the PJM RPM reflects the auction design to encourage increased capacity resources to meet
projected demand. As a result of these auctions, EME Homer City expects capacity revenues to increase significantly through May 31, 2011 as compared to the amounts realized by EME Homer City
previously. For further discussion regarding the PJM and recent auctions, see "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskCapacity Price Risk."

Overview of EME Homer City's Operating Performance

EME Homer City's net income (loss) was $88.1 million, $39.2 million and ($11.1) million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2007 increase in
earnings was primarily attributable to an increase in energy revenues from higher generation and average realized energy prices. EME Homer City also had higher capacity revenues and lower
SO2 emission allowance costs. Earnings for 2007 were adversely

23

---



affected
due to the timing of unrealized gains and losses related to hedge contracts, as described further in "Results of OperationsOperating Revenues." Also offsetting the increases in
earnings were higher maintenance costs in 2007 related to a planned outage at Unit 2 and lower other income in 2007 for the estimated insurance recovery related to the Unit 3 outage of
$2.5 million recorded during 2007, as compared to $10.8 million recorded during 2006. The Unit 3 outage reduced the amount of generation during 2006.

The
average realized energy price received by EME Homer City increased to $54.40/MWh in 2007 as compared to $48.02/MWh in 2006 and $45.05/MWh in 2005. The average realized energy prices
compare to average real-time market prices at the Homer City busbar of $51.03/MWh in 2007, $45.15/MWh in 2006 and $54.80/MWh in 2005. The average realized energy price was higher than the
average real-time market price due to hedge contracts entered into in prior periods. Average market prices increased in 2007 compared to 2006 due to an increase in demand at PJM. Average
market prices declined in 2006 compared to 2005 due to lower natural gas prices.

The
cost of SO2 emission allowances (pre-tax) decreased to $30.6 million in 2007 as compared to $34.5 million in 2006 and $81.3 million in
2005. EME Homer City purchased more allowances in 2007 compared to 2006, due to increased generation. The price of emission allowances, particularly SO2 allowances issued through the Acid
Rain Program of the US EPA, decreased in 2007 from 2006 and decreased in 2006 from 2005 year-end prices. The average price of purchased SO2 allowances was $512 per ton
in 2007, $664 per ton in 2006 and $1,219 per ton in 2005. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskEmission Allowances Price Risk" for additional information.

Critical Accounting Policies

Introduction

The accounting policies described below are viewed by management as "critical" because their correct application requires the use of material judgments and
estimates, and they have a material impact on EME Homer City's results of operations and financial position.

Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

EME Homer City uses derivative financial instruments for hedging activities for non-trading purposes. Derivative financial instruments are mainly
utilized to manage exposure from changes in electricity and fuel prices. EME Homer City follows SFAS No. 133, which requires derivative financial instruments to be recorded at their fair value
unless an exception applies. SFAS No. 133 also requires that changes in a derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. For
derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in fair value are either offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm
commitments through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately
recognized in earnings. For further discussion, see "Market Risk ExposuresAccounting for Energy Contracts."

Management's
judgment is required to determine if a transaction meets the definition of a derivative and, if it does, whether the normal sales and purchases exception applies or whether
individual transactions qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Determining the fair value of derivatives under SFAS No. 133 is a critical accounting policy because the fair value of a
derivative is susceptible to significant change resulting from a number of factors, including: volatility of energy prices, credits risks, market

24

---



liquidity
and discount rates. See "Market Risk Exposures" for a description of risk management activities and sensitivities to change in market prices.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

EME Homer City follows SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" (SFAS No. 144). EME Homer City
evaluates long-lived assets whenever indicators of impairment exist. This accounting standard requires that if the undiscounted expected future cash flow from a company's assets or group
of assets (without interest charges) is less than its carrying value, asset impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of impairment is determined by the difference between
the carrying amount and fair value of the asset.

The
assessment of impairment is a critical accounting policy because significant management judgment is required to determine: (1) if an indicator of impairment has occurred,
(2) the forecast of undiscounted expected future cash flow over the asset's estimated useful life to determine if an impairment exists, and (3) if an impairment exists, the fair value of
the asset or asset group. Factors that EME Homer City considers important, which could trigger an impairment, include operating losses, projected future operating losses, the financial condition of
counterparties or significant negative industry or economic trends. The expected future undiscounted cash flow from the Homer City facilities is a critical accounting policy because:
(1) estimating future prices of energy and capacity in wholesale energy markets is susceptible to significant change, and (2) the period of the forecast is over an extended period of
time due to the estimated remaining useful life of 27.67 years for the Homer City facilities, and (3) the impact of an impairment on EME Homer City's financial position and results of
operations would be material. At December 31, 2007, the expected undiscounted future cash flow from long-lived assets exceeded the carrying value of those assets.

Income Taxes

SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" requires the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for deferred income taxes. EME
Homer City uses the asset and liability method
of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary differences. FIN No. 48 (adopted on January 1, 2007) requires an
enterprise to recognize, in its financial statements, the best estimate of the impact of a tax position by determining if the weight of the available evidence indicates it is more likely than not,
based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit. Management continues to monitor and assess new income tax developments. See "Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary DataNotes to Financial StatementsNote 6. Income Taxes" for additional details.

As
part of the process of preparing its financial statements, EME Homer City is required to estimate its income taxes in each jurisdiction in which it operates. This process involves
estimating actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation, for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within EME Homer City's balance sheet. In addition, estimated taxes for uncertain tax positions are accrued and included
in accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities in the balance sheet. Income tax expense includes the current tax liability from operations and the change in deferred income taxes
during the year. Accounting for tax obligations requires judgments, including estimating reserves for potential adverse outcomes regarding tax positions that have been taken. Management uses judgment
in determination of whether the evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit.

25

---



At
December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had net federal and state deferred tax assets of $102.1 million. In assessing the realization of EME Homer City's deferred tax assets,
management considered whether it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of EME Homer City's deferred income tax assets depends upon its ability to
generate taxable income in the future or utilize losses through a reduction in the loan with Edison Mission Finance Co. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the recoverability of its
deferred tax assets to ensure there is adequate support for the realization of the deferred tax assets. In the event management were to determine that EME Homer City would not be able to realize all
or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged as a reduction to income in the period such determination was made.

For
additional information regarding EME Homer City's accounting policies, see "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataNotes to Financial
StatementsNote 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."

26

---





RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary

The table below summarizes total revenues as well as key performance measures related to coal-fired generation, which represents the majority of
EME Homer City's operations.

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005Operating Revenues(in millions)

$
764

$
642

$
592StatisticsGeneration (in GWh)


13,649


12,286


13,637Equivalent availability(1)


89.4%


81.9%


85.2%Capacity factor(2)


82.5%


74.3%


82.4%Load factor(3)


92.4%


90.7%


96.7%Forced outage rate(4)


4.1%


13.5%


4.8%Average realized energy price/MWh(5)

$
54.40

$
48.02

$
45.05Capacity revenue only (in millions)

$
30

$
16

$
18Average fuel costs/MWh

$
22.45

$
23.05

$
21.08


---

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in millions)Operating revenues

$
764

$
642

$
592Less:Unrealized losses (gains)


10


(35
)

41Other revenues


(31
)

(17
)

(18
)Realized revenues

$
743

$
590

$
615Generation (in GWh)


13,649


12,286


13,637Average realized energy price/MWh

$
54.40

$
48.02

$
45.05


Operating Revenues

Operating revenues increased $122.0 million in 2007 compared to 2006, and $50.2 million in 2006 compared to 2005. The 2007 increase was primarily
attributable to higher generation and higher average realized energy prices, as compared to 2006. EME Homer City also had higher capacity revenues as a result of participating in the
PJM RPM auctions. These increases were adversely affected by the timing

27

---



of
unrealized gains and losses from hedging activities. The 2006 increase was primarily attributable to the timing of unrealized gains and losses from hedging activities. Hedging activities are
described in more detail below. Also contributing to an increase in revenues in 2006 were higher average realized energy prices offset by lower generation due to higher forced outages, including the
Unit 3 outage in January 2006.

The
average realized energy price received by EME Homer City in 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $54.40/MWh, $48.02/MWh and $45.05/MWh, respectively, compared to the average
real-time market price at the Homer City busbar for the same periods of $51.03/MWh, $45.15/MWh and $54.80/MWh, respectively. EME Homer City's average realized energy price varies
from the average real-time market price due to: (1) hedge contracts having been entered into in prior periods, (2) differences between market prices during periods of actual
generation (generally weighted to on-peak periods) and the 24-hour average real-time market prices, and (3) changes in the differential in market prices at
the PJM West Hub versus the Homer City busbar. The increase in the differential is referred to as a widening of the basis between these PJM locations. EME Homer City hedges its energy price
risk at PJM West Hub and retains the risk that the basis between PJM West Hub and Homer City widens. During the past three years, the basis between these two locations has continued to widen resulting
in ineffective losses on hedge contracts. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskBasis Risk."

Included
in operating revenues were unrealized gains (losses) from hedging activities of $(9.8) million, $34.3 million and $(41.6) million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Unrealized gains (losses) were primarily attributable to the ineffective portion of forward and futures contracts which are derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133. The
ineffective portion of hedge contracts was primarily attributable to changes in the difference between energy prices at PJM West Hub and the energy prices at the Homer City busbar (the delivery point
where power generated by the Homer City facilities is delivered into the transmission system). At December 31, 2007, unrealized losses of $20.9 million were recognized primarily from the
ineffective portion of cash flow hedges related to subsequent periods. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price Risk" and "Market Risk ExposuresAccounting for Energy
Contracts" for more information.

On
January 29, 2006, the main power transformer on Unit 3 of the Homer City facilities failed, resulting in a suspension of operations at this unit. EME Homer City secured
a replacement transformer and Unit 3 returned to service on May 5, 2006. The main transformer failure resulted in claims under EME Homer City's property and business interruption
insurance policies, which have been settled and paid.

Seasonal Disclosure

Due to higher electric demand resulting from warmer weather during the summer months and cold weather during the winter months, electric revenues from the Homer
City facilities vary substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, maintenance outages generally are scheduled during periods of lower projected electric demand (spring and fall) further reducing
generation and increasing major maintenance costs which are recorded as an expense when incurred. Accordingly, earnings from the Homer City facilities are seasonal and have significant variability
from quarter to quarter. Seasonal fluctuations may also be affected by changes in market prices. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskEnergy Price Risk" for further
discussion regarding market prices.

28

---



Operating Expenses

Operating expenses increased $39.1 million in 2007 compared to 2006, and decreased $11.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005. Operating expenses
consisted of expenses for fuel, gain on sale of emission allowances, plant operations, depreciation and amortization, loss on disposal of assets, and administrative and general expenses. The change in
the components of operating expenses is discussed below.

Fuel
expenses increased $23.2 million in 2007 compared to 2006, and decreased $4.3 million in 2006 compared to 2005. The 2007 increase was due to higher coal consumption as
a result of higher generation, partially offset by lower coal prices and lower cost of SO2 emission allowances. During 2007 EME Homer City purchased more SO2 emission
allowances at lower market prices. The 2006 decrease was due to lower generation and lower cost of SO2 emission allowances, partially offset by higher coal costs driven primarily by
scheduled price increases, the expiration in 2005 of certain lower-priced contracts and premiums charged for lower sulfur coal. EME Homer City's cost of SO2 emission allowances was
$30.6 million, $34.5 million and $81.3 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskEmission Allowances
Price Risk" for more information regarding the price of SO2 allowances.

Loss
(gain) from the sale of emission allowances was $0.7 million, $(2.2) million and $(4.9) million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EME Homer City sold excess
NOX emission allowances to affiliates and third parties in all three years.

Plant
operations increased $12.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006, and decreased $5.7 million in 2006 compared to 2005. Plant operations include labor and overhead,
contract services, parts and supplies and other administrative costs. The 2007 increase was primarily attributable to higher maintenance costs related to a planned outage at Unit 2 during the
second quarter. Planned maintenance expenses vary year to year based on the scheduled cycle times of equipment.

Depreciation
and amortization were $61.4 million, $59.4 million and $63.4 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As a result of the
sale-leaseback in December 2001, depreciation and amortization consists primarily of EME Homer City's leasehold interest, which is being depreciated over the minimum term of the
leases of 33.67 years.

Administrative
and general expenses were $3.8 million, $5.2 million and $5.5 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest and other income was $9.0 million, $20.3 million and $3.6 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest and other
income typically relates to interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. In 2007, EME Homer City recorded other income of $2.5 million related to the Unit 3 outage insurance
claim. In 2006, EME Homer City recorded other income of $10.8 million for the estimated insurance recovery related to the Unit 3 outage. EME Homer City had increases in
interest earned on temporary cash investments in both 2007 and 2006.

Interest
expense was $139.3 million, $145.5 million and $146.9 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest expense primarily relates to the lease
financing of the Homer City facilities that originated in December 2001. Interest expense also includes interest of $37.6 million, $39.9 million and $37.1 million during 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, on EME Homer City's subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance.

29

---



Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

EME Homer City had effective income tax provision (benefit) rates of 38.2%, 39.5% and (26.6)% in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EME Homer City's
effective income tax provision (benefit) rate varies from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes and estimated benefits from a federal deduction related to qualified domestic
production activities under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Related Party Transactions

EMMT Agreements

EME Homer City has entered into a master purchase, sale and services agreement with EMMT, pursuant to which EMMT arranges for purchases and sales of the
following products, including related services: (i) electric energy and capacity; (ii) fuel oil; and (iii) emission allowances.

EME Homer
City compensates EMMT in accordance with the following table with respect to these transactions and reimburses EMMT for brokers fees, taxes, and other reasonably
incurred direct out-of-pocket expenses. Payment for these services is due within 30 days of billing.

Service

CompensationEnergy and/or capacity

$.02/MWh ($.02/MW-day for capacity)Fuel oil

$.05/bblEmission allowances

$.25/SO2 allowance; and $25/NOX allowance


The net fees earned by EMMT were $0.5 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Beginning in the second quarter of 2003, EMMT began prepaying in full for the following month's expected power generation. As a result of the accelerated payments,
EME Homer City had payables due to EMMT of $72.8 million and $91.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

EME Homer
City entered into several transactions through EMMT for the purchase or sale of SO2 and NOX allowances. All transactions were completed at market
price on the date of the transaction. Net consideration paid by EME Homer City was $74.4 million, $27.4 million and $80.0 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Fuel Services Agreements

EME Homer City entered into an agreement with Edison Mission Energy Services, Inc. to provide fuel and transportation services related to coal and
fuel oil. Under the terms of this agreement, EME Homer City paid a service fee of $.06 for each ton of coal delivered and $.05 for each barrel of fuel oil delivered, plus the actual cost of the
commodities. The agreement terminated during 2006. The amount billable under this agreement for the service fee for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $0.3 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.

Affiliate Financing

EME Homer City obtained financing from Edison Mission Finance in connection with its acquisition of the Homer City facilities, in the form of a
subordinated revolving loan. The subordinated revolving loan matures in 2014, with no scheduled repayment prior to its maturity. This loan is subordinated to

30

---



EME Homer
City's lease rent obligations, with interest and principal payments subject to limitations based on EME Homer City's ability to make distributions under the
sale-leaseback agreements. On December 8, 2003, EME Homer City amended and restated the subordinated revolving loan agreement and issued a note evidencing its repayment
obligations under the loan agreement. The amended and restated subordinated revolving loan agreement had no effect on the financial terms of the agreement.

Tax-Allocation Agreements

EME Homer City is included in the consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Edison International and is party to a tax-allocation
agreement with its indirect parent, Edison Mission Holdings Co. As long as Edison International continues to own, directly or indirectly, at least 80% of the voting power of the stock of EME
and its existing subsidiaries and at least 80% of the value of such stock, EME Homer City will be included in the consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Edison International. In
accordance with the agreement and the tax-allocation procedures in effect since EME Homer City's formation, its current tax liability or benefit is generally determined on a
separate return basis, except for calculating consolidated state income taxes, for which EME Homer City uses the state tax apportionment factors of the Edison International group. Also, while
EME Homer City is generally subject to separate return limitations for net losses, under the tax-allocation agreement EME Homer City is permitted to transfer to Edison
Mission Holdings, or its subsidiaries, net operating loss benefits which would not yet be realized in a separate return in exchange for a reduction in its intercompany account balances (including the
subordinated revolving loan). EME Homer City also files a separate state income tax return in Pennsylvania.

Amounts
included in due to affiliates on the balance sheet associated with this tax-allocation agreement totaled $91.4 million and $25.6 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

On
March 31, 2006, EME Homer City entered into an amendment of its tax-allocation agreement with Edison Mission Holdings to provide for the option, at
EME Homer City's discretion, to settle federal and state income tax liabilities under the tax-allocation agreement through
an increase in indebtedness under the subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance. Pursuant to this amendment, EME Homer City elected this option to settle
$60.2 million of intercompany tax liabilities through a loan under the subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance.

Services Agreements with EME and Edison International

Certain administrative services such as payroll, employee benefit programs, insurance, and information technology are shared among all affiliates of Edison
International and the costs of these corporate support services are allocated to all affiliates. The cost of services provided by Edison International and EME, including those related to
EME Homer City, are allocated based on one of the following formulas: percentage of the time worked, equity in investment and advances, number of employees, or multi-factor (operating revenues,
operating expenses, total assets and total employees). EME Homer City participates in a common payroll and benefit program with all Edison International employees. In addition, EME Homer
City is billed for any direct labor and out-of-pocket expenses for services directly requested for the benefit of the partnership. EME Homer City believes the allocation
methodologies are reasonable. EME Homer City made reimbursements for the cost of these programs, payroll funding and other services totaling $33.9 million, $32.1 million and
$31.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EME Homer City had a net payable of $0.3 million and $0.1 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to Edison International related to these programs.

31

---



EME Homer
City participates in the insurance program of Edison International, including property, general liability, workers compensation and various other specialty policies.
EME Homer City's insurance premiums are generally based on its share of risk related to each policy. In connection with the property insurance program, a portion of the risk is reinsured by a
captive insurance subsidiary of Edison International.

Management and Administration Agreement with Midwest Generation EME, LLC

EME Homer City and Midwest Generation EME entered into a management and administration agreement pursuant to which Midwest Generation EME charges
EME Homer City for management and administrative services. Actual costs billable under this agreement for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $2.3 million,
$2.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively. EME Homer City had a payable of $0.1 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to
Midwest Generation EME related to this agreement.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Principles Adopted

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard Interpretation No. 48

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN No. 48 requires an enterprise to
recognize, in its financial statements, the best estimate of the impact of a tax position by determining if the weight of the available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on
the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit. EME Homer City adopted FIN No. 48 effective January 1, 2007. Adoption of FIN No. 48 did not result in a
cumulative-effect adjustment to partners' equity.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, which amends SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for at fair value at acquisition, at issuance, or
when a previously recognized financial instrument is subject to a remeasurement event, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, in cases in which a derivative would otherwise have
to be bifurcated. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to remeasurement after January 1, 2007. The fair value election provided for in
paragraph 4(c) of this Statement may also be applied upon adoption of this Statement for hybrid financial instruments that had been bifurcated under paragraph 12 of SFAS No. 133
prior to the adoption of this Statement. The adoption of this standard had no effect on EME Homer City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted

FASB Staff Position FIN No. 39-1

In April 2007, the FASB issued FIN No. 39-1. FIN No. 39-1 amends paragraph 3 of FIN No. 39 to replace the
terms conditional contracts and exchange contracts with the term derivative instruments as defined in SFAS No. 133. FIN No. 39-1 also states that under master netting
arrangements if collateral is based on fair value, then it must be netted with the fair value of derivative assets/liabilities if an entity qualified and elected the option to net those amounts.
EME Homer City will adopt FIN No. 39-1 in the

32

---



first
quarter of 2008. EME Homer City does not currently have margining agreements and accordingly, adoption of FIN No. 39-1 will not have an impact on its financial
statements.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, which provides an option to report eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with changes in
fair value recognized in earnings. EME Homer City will adopt this pronouncement in the first quarter of 2008. Since EME Homer City elected not to report any current financial assets and
liabilities at fair value, the adoption will not result in any cumulative-effect adjustment to partners' equity.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, which clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
the disclosures on fair value measurements. EME Homer City will adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of 2008. The adoption is not expected to result in any retrospective adjustment to
its financial statements. The accounting requirements for employers' pension and other postretirement benefit plans is effective at the end of 2008, which is the next measurement date for these
benefit plans. The effective date will be January 1,
2009 for AROs and other nonfinancial liabilities which are not measured or disclosed on a recurring basis (at least annually).

33

---





LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Introduction

The following discussion of liquidity and capital resources is organized in the following sections:

PageCash Flow

34Capital Expenditures and Lease Covenants

35Distributions to EME

36Credit Ratings

36Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

38Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

41Environmental Matters and Regulations

41


Cash Flow

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had cash and cash equivalents of $142.4 million compared to $113.8 million at December 31, 2006.
Net working capital at December 31, 2007 was $(54.4) million compared to $36.2 million at December 31, 2006. The net working capital decrease of $90.6 million is primarily
attributable to the refund of deposits under the lease swap agreement that terminated in 2007, a net increase in derivative liabilities, a decrease in fuel inventory, and an increase in other payable
to affiliates. Partially offsetting the decrease was an increase in cash and cash equivalents, an increase in current deferred tax assets, an increase in SO2 emission allowances, and a
decrease in interest payable to affiliate.

Net
cash provided by operating activities was $152.3 million, $88.7 million and $76.8 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2007 increase was primarily
attributable to higher net income in 2007, an increase of SO2 emission allowances and the timing of cash receipts and disbursement related to working capital items. The 2006 increase in
operating cash flow was primarily due to a temporary increase in interest payable to Edison Mission Finance and the timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to working capital items. EME
Homer City made a $35 million interest payment to Edison Mission Finance in January 2007.

Net
cash used in financing activities was $122.2 million, $34.6 million and $79.2 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2007 increase was primarily
attributable to total repayments of $117.8 million in 2007, versus total borrowings of $13.5 million in 2006, under the subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance.
In addition, EME Homer City received a payment of $45.4 million from the termination of the lease swap agreement in 2007, compared to advances of $61.1 million received under the lease
swap agreement in 2006. The 2006 decrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to no repayments made under the subordinated revolving loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance while
borrowings increased in 2006, as compared to net repayments on that affiliate debt in 2005. The 2006 borrowings include an $8.8 million advance made by EME in March, through Edison Mission
Finance, to assist EME Homer City with the cash shortfall relating to the Unit 3 outage. In October 2006, EME Homer City returned the $8.8 million to Edison Mission Finance as an interest
payment.

Net
cash used in investing activities was $1.5 million, $0.5 million and $11.6 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2007 increase was primarily due to a
release of funds from EME Homer City's restricted cash accounts in 2007 as compared to the 2006 proceeds received from the sale of

34

---



emission
allowances and from a settlement in connection with the 2002 outage of Unit 3. The 2006 decrease in cash used in investing activities was due to lower capital expenditures and proceeds
received in 2006 related to a settlement with Alstom Power in connection with the 2002 outage of Unit 3. Capital expenditures were $12.3 million, $10.8 million and $16.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2007 capital expenditures were primarily related to mercury emission monitoring and non-environmental
improvements. The 2006 capital expenditures were primarily related to non-environmental improvements. The 2005 capital expenditures were for SCR system performance improvements and
non-environmental improvements.

The
use of EME Homer City's cash generated from operations is restricted by the sale-leaseback agreements. EME Homer City believes that it will have adequate liquidity to
meet its obligations as they become due in the next 12 months.

Capital Expenditures and Lease Covenants

At December 31, 2007, the three-year estimated capital expenditures by EME Homer City were as follows:

2008

2009

2010(in millions)Plant capital expenditures

$
35.0

$
33.7

$
26.1Environmental expenditures


17.7


9.1


8.5Total

$
52.7

$
42.8

$
34.6


Plant capital expenditures relate to non-environmental projects such as upgrades to boiler and turbine controls, railroad
interconnection, replacement of major boiler components and ash site disposal development. Environmental expenditures relate to projects such as mercury emission monitoring and control and a selenium
removal system. EME Homer City plans to fund these expenditures with cash on hand or cash generated from operations. See further discussion regarding possible additional capital expenditures,
including environmental control equipment, under "Environmental Matters and RegulationsAir Quality Regulation."

Under
the participation agreements entered into as part of the sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City's ability to enter into specified transactions and to engage in
specified business activities, including financing and investment activities, is subject to significant restrictions. These restrictions could affect, and in some cases significantly limit or
prohibit, its ability to, among other things, merge, consolidate or sell its assets, create liens on its properties or assets, enter into non-permitted trading activities, enter into
transactions with its affiliates, incur indebtedness, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist guarantees or contingent obligations, make restricted payments to its partners, make capital
expenditures, own subsidiaries, liquidate or dissolve, engage in non-permitted business activities, sublease its leasehold interests in the facilities or make improvements to the
facilities. Accordingly, EME Homer City's liquidity is substantially based on its ability to generate cash flow from operations. If EME Homer City is unable to generate cash flow from operations
necessary to meet its obligations, EME Homer City will have limited ability to obtain additional capital on attractive terms and conditions, unless its partners provide additional funding, which they
are under no legal obligation to do.

The
rent payments that EME Homer City owes under the sale-leaseback agreements are comprised of two components, a senior rent portion and an equity rent portion. The senior
rent is used exclusively for debt service to the holders of the senior secured bonds issued in connection with the sale-leaseback

35

---



transaction,
while the equity rent is paid to the owner-lessors. In order to pay the equity portion of the rent, EME Homer City is required to meet historical and projected senior rent service
coverage ratios of 1.7 to 1 subject to reduction to 1.3 to 1 under circumstances specified in the participation agreements. During the 12 months ended December 31, 2007, the senior rent
service coverage ratio was 4.16 to 1. The senior rent service coverage ratio is determined by dividing net cash flow as defined in the participation agreements by the senior rent due in that period.
In addition, if EME Homer City does not meet specified debt service coverage ratios while the lease debt is outstanding, it will not pay the equity portion of the rent to the owner-lessors.
Accordingly, the sale-leaseback documentation does not permit the lessor to terminate the lease in the event of non-payment of the equity portion of the rent while the lease
debt is outstanding.

EME
Homer City's use of cash in its bank accounts is limited to specific operating and capital expenditures as set forth in the security deposit agreement executed as part of the
sale-leaseback transaction. The amount in certain reserve accounts will be available for payments due on the equity portion of lease rent during specified periods, and in accordance with
the sale-leaseback documents, unless there is a default in the payment of the senior portion of lease rent, in which case the amount will be available to pay such senior portion of the
lease rent. The release of funds from these restricted cash accounts is permitted, provided EME Homer City maintains specified reserve balances in accordance with the sale-leaseback
documents, no event of default shall have occurred or be continuing and no two failed rent payments shall have occurred. EME Homer City had $30 million included in restricted cash at
December 31, 2007 related to these reserve accounts.

Distributions to EME

The following table summarizes the payments by EME Homer City under its subordinated revolving loan that constitute permitted distributions pursuant to the terms
of the sale-leaseback transaction:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006(1)

2005(in millions)Payment of interest

$
69.4

$


$
47.7Payment of principal


117.8





38.3Total payments

$
187.2

$


$
86.0


---

Credit Ratings

EME Homer City is not currently rated. EME Homer City has entered into a contract with EMMT for the sale of energy and capacity from its facilities, which enables
this marketing affiliate to engage in forward sales and hedging. Credit ratings for EME and EMMT, at December 31, 2007, were as follows:

Moody's Rating

S&P Rating

Fitch RatingEME

B1

BB-

BB-EMMT

Not Rated

BB-

Not Rated


EME Homer City cannot provide assurance that the credit ratings above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of
these ratings will not be lowered. EME Homer City notes

36

---



that
these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and may be revised at any time by a rating agency.

EME
Homer City's sale-leaseback documents restrict EME Homer City's ability to enter into trading activities, as defined in the documents, with EMMT to sell forward the
output of its facilities if EMMT does not have an investment grade credit rating from S&P or Moody's or, in the absence of those ratings, if it is not rated as investment grade pursuant to EME's
internal credit scoring procedures. These documents include a requirement that the counterparty to such transactions, and EME Homer City, if acting as seller to an unaffiliated third party, be
investment grade. EME Homer City, which is not rated, currently sells all the output from its facilities through EMMT, which has a below investment grade credit rating. Therefore, in order for EME
Homer City to continue to sell forward the output of its facilities, either: (1) EME Homer City must obtain consent from the sale-leaseback owner participant to permit it to sell
directly into the market or through EMMT; or (2) EMMT must provide assurances of performance consistent with the requirements of the sale-leaseback documents. EME Homer City has
obtained a consent from the sale-leaseback owner participant that will allow it to enter into such sales, under specified conditions, through December 31, 2008. EME Homer City
continues to be in compliance with the terms of the consent. EME Homer City is permitted to sell the output of its facilities into the spot market at any time. See "Market Risk
ExposuresCommodity Price Risk."

37

---



Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes EME Homer City's significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007.

Payments Due by Period (in millions)Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 3
years

3 to 5
years

More than 5 yearsLong-term debt to affiliate(1)

$
599.0

$


$


$


$
599.0Lease financing(2)


2,432.5


152.2


305.8


320.2


1,654.3Operating lease obligations(3)


1.4


0.6


0.7


0.1


Purchase obligations:Capital improvements


10.8


10.8








Fuel supply contracts


451.6


245.8


205.8





Coal transportation


10.6


10.6








Coal cleaning agreement


16.7


5.4


11.3





Other contractual obligations


26.0


5.2


13.7


7.1


Employee benefit plan contribution(4)


3.1


3.1








Total Contractual Obligations

$
3,551.7

$
433.7

$
537.3

$
327.4

$
2,253.3


---

Lease Financing

On December 7, 2001, EME Homer City completed a sale-leaseback of its facilities to third-party lessors for an aggregate purchase price of
$1.591 billion, comprised of $782 million in cash and assumption of debt (the fair value of which was $809.3 million). Under the terms of the 33.67-year leases, EME
Homer City is obligated to make semi-annual lease payments on each April 1 and October 1. The gain recognized on the sale of the facilities has been deferred and is being
amortized over the term of the leases.

Purchase Obligations

Capital Improvements

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had firm commitments in 2008 for capital expenditures related to non-environmental improvements such as
upgrades to boiler and turbine controls, replacement of major boiler components, and environmental improvements such as mercury emission monitoring and control.

38

---



Fuel Supply Contracts

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had fuel purchase commitments with various third-party suppliers for the purchase of bituminous steam coal and fuel
oil. The contracts require EME Homer City to purchase a minimum quantity over the term of the contracts, with an option at EME Homer City's discretion to purchase additional amounts as stated in the
agreements.

Coal Transportation Agreements

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had contractual commitments for the transport of coal by rail to its facilities, with one year remaining on the
contract. The minimum commitments are based on the contract provisions, which consist of fixed prices, subject to adjustment clauses. Although trucking remains the predominant mode of transportation
for coal shipments to the Homer City facilities, rail transportation is expected to increase in 2008 as EME Homer City diversifies its alternative modes of transporting coal to the plant site.

Coal Cleaning Agreement

Effective January 1, 2006, EME Homer City entered into a coal cleaning agreement with Homer City Coal Processing Corporation to operate and maintain a coal
cleaning plant owned by EME Homer City. The agreement expires on December 31, 2010.

Other Contractual Obligations

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had contractual commitments for the purchase of limestone, which is used for the wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization
system on Unit 3, and ammonia.

Commercial Commitments

Interconnection Agreement

EME Homer City's general partner, Mission Energy Westside, is a party to an interconnection agreement with NYSEG and Penelec to provide interconnection services
necessary to interconnect the Homer City facilities with NYSEG's and Penelec's transmission systems. Unless terminated earlier in accordance with specified terms, the interconnection agreement will
terminate on a date mutually agreed to by Mission Energy Westside, NYSEG and Penelec. This date will not exceed the retirement date of the Homer City units. NYSEG and Penelec have agreed to extend the
interconnection services (but not the expiration of the agreement) to modifications, additions or upgrades to, or repowering of the Homer City units. Mission Energy Westside is required to compensate
NYSEG and Penelec for all reasonable costs associated with any modifications, additions or replacements made to NYSEG's or Penelec's interconnection facilities or transmission systems in connection
with any modification, addition or upgrade to, or repowering of the Homer City units.

Guarantees and Indemnities

Tax Indemnity Agreements

In connection with the sale-leaseback transaction related to the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City and its indirect parent, EME, entered into tax
indemnity agreements. Under these tax indemnity agreements, EME Homer City and EME agreed to indemnify the equity investors in the sale-leaseback transaction for specified adverse tax
consequences that could result in certain situations set forth in the

39

---



tax
indemnity agreements, including specified defaults under the respective leases. The potential indemnity obligation under these tax indemnity agreements could be significant. Due to the nature of
the obligations under these tax indemnity agreements, EME Homer City cannot determine a maximum potential liability. The indemnities would be triggered by a valid claim from the lessors. EME Homer
City has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.

Indemnity Provided as Part of the Acquisition of the Homer City Facilities

In connection with the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City agreed to indemnify the sellers with respect to specific environmental liabilities
before and after the date of sale. Payments would be triggered under this indemnity by a claim from the sellers. EME guaranteed the obligations of EME Homer City. Due to the nature of the obligation
under this indemnity provision, it is not subject to a maximum potential liability and does not have an expiration date. EME Homer City has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.

Contingencies

Ash Disposal Site

EME Homer City's ash disposal site is a permitted Class I Residual Waste Landfill, the most stringently regulated of the three categories of residual waste
landfills authorized by the regulations of the PADEP. EME Homer City's permit allows it to dispose of coal combustion by-products, including
fly ash, bottom ash and pyrites, and miscellaneous plant wastes at the landfill. The wastes are deposited in compacted layers within lifts, or sections. Each lift where coal ash is disposed must be
capped and covered when it reaches final grade. EME Homer City must also monitor groundwater quality at and adjacent to the ash disposal site through a network of monitoring wells and report the
results to the PADEP on a periodic basis. In the event that a disposal facility's groundwater monitoring identifies degradation in any of its wells, the PADEP's regulations require the facility to
first confirm the existence and nature of the degradation by conducting a groundwater assessment. If the assessment confirms groundwater degradation in excess of the applicable regulatory standards,
the facility is then required to prepare and implement an abatement plan that could include measures such as installing a liner in a previously unlined area. To date, no degradation has been found in
the groundwater monitoring system at EME Homer City that would require the development of an assessment or abatement plan. EME Homer City also provides financial assurance in the form of a surety bond
to guarantee its closure and post-closure obligations at the landfill. The estimated closure date is 2018. Based on the remaining capacity of the landfill and the estimated material
requiring future disposal, EME Homer City has begun permitting additional areas for expansion of the landfill. Management does not believe that the costs of maintaining and closing the ash disposal
site will have a material impact on EME Homer City's financial statements.

Insurance

EME Homer City maintains insurance policies that are comparable to those carried by other electric generating facilities of a similar size. The insurance program
includes all-risk real and personal property insurance, including coverage for losses from boiler and machinery breakdowns, and the perils of earthquake and flood, subject to certain
sublimits. The property insurance program currently covers losses up to $1.25 billion. Under the terms of the participation agreements entered into as part of EME Homer City's
sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City is required to maintain specified minimum insurance coverages if and to the extent that such insurance is available on a commercially reasonable
basis. Although the insurance covering the Homer City facilities is comparable to insurance coverages

40

---



normally
carried by companies engaged in similar businesses, and owning similar properties, the insurance coverages that are in place do not meet the minimum insurance coverages required under the
participation agreements. Due to the current market environment, the minimum insurance coverage is not commercially available at reasonable prices. EME Homer City has obtained a waiver under the
participation agreements which permits it to maintain its current insurance coverage through June 1, 2008.

EME
Homer City also carries general liability insurance covering liabilities to third parties for bodily injury or property damage resulting from operations, automobile liability
insurance and excess liability insurance. Limits and deductibles in respect of these insurance policies are consistent with the requirements of the participation agreements.

FERC Notice Regarding Investigatory Proceeding against EMMT

In October 2006, EMMT was advised by the enforcement staff at the FERC that it is prepared to recommend that the FERC initiate a formal investigatory proceeding
and seek monetary sanctions against EMMT for alleged violation of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the FERC's rules regarding market behavior, all with respect to certain bidding practices previously
employed by EMMT. EMMT is engaged in discussions with the staff to explore the possibility of resolution of this matter. Discussions to date have been constructive and may lead to a settlement
agreement acceptable to both parties. Should these discussions not result in a settlement and a formal proceeding commenced, EMMT will be entitled to contest any alleged violations before the FERC and
an appropriate court. EMMT has advised EME Homer City that EMMT believes that it has complied with all applicable laws and regulations in the bidding practices that it employed, and intends to contest
vigorously any allegation of violation.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

EME Homer City has no material off-balance sheet transactions.

Environmental Matters and Regulations

Introduction

The construction and operation of power plants are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities. EME Homer City believes that it is
in substantial compliance with existing environmental regulatory requirements. However, possible future developments, such as the promulgation of more stringent environmental laws and regulations,
future proceedings that may be initiated by environmental and other regulatory authorities, cases in which new theories of liability are recognized, and settlements agreed to by other companies that
establish precedent or expectations for the power industry, could affect the costs and the manner in which EME Homer City conducts its business and could require substantial additional capital or
operational expenditures or the ceasing of operations at certain of its facilities. There is no assurance that EME Homer City's financial position and results of operations would not be materially
adversely affected. EME Homer City is unable to predict the precise extent to which additional laws and regulations may affect its future operations and capital expenditure requirements.

Typically,
environmental laws and regulations require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits and approvals prior to construction, operation or modification of a
project or generating facility. Meeting all the necessary requirements can delay or sometimes prevent the completion of a proposed project, as well as require extensive modifications to existing
projects, which may involve significant capital or operational expenditures. If EME Homer City fails to comply with applicable

41

---



environmental
laws, it may be subject to injunctive relief or penalties and fines imposed by federal and state regulatory authorities.

Air Quality Regulation

The federal CAA, state clean air acts, and federal and state regulations implementing such statutes have substantial impacts on power generation facilities,
particularly coal-fired plants. Federal environmental regulations require reductions in emissions beginning in 2009 and require states to adopt implementation plans that are equal to or
more stringent than the federal requirements. Compliance with these regulations and SIPs will affect the costs and the manner in which EME Homer City conducts its business, and will likely require EME
Homer City to make substantial additional capital expenditures. There is no assurance that EME Homer City would be able to recover these increased costs from its customers or that EME Homer City's
financial position and results of operations would not be materially adversely affected as a result.

Clean Air Interstate Rule

The CAIR, issued by the US EPA on March 10, 2005, applies to 28 eastern states and the District of Columbia and is intended to address ozone and fine
particulate matter attainment issues by reducing regional NOX and SO2 emissions. The CAIR reduces the current CAA Title IV Phase II SO2 emissions allowance
cap for 2010 and 2015 by 50% and 65%, respectively. The CAIR also requires reductions in regional NOX emissions in 2009 and 2015 by 53% and 61%, respectively, from 2003 levels. The CAIR
has been challenged in court by state, environmental and industry groups, which may result in changes to the substance of the rule and to the timetables for implementation.

EME
Homer City expects that compliance with the CAIR and the regulations and revised SIPs developed as a consequence of the CAIR will result in increased capital expenditures and
operating expenses. EME Homer City's approach to meeting these obligations will consist of a blending of capital expenditure and emission allowance purchases that will be based on an ongoing
assessment of the dynamics of its market conditions.

On
December 18, 2007, the Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board approved the Pennsylvania CAIR. This rule has been submitted to the US EPA for approval as part of the
Pennsylvania SIP. The Pennsylvania CAIR is substantively similar to the CAIR. EME Homer City will be subject to the federal CAIR rule during 2009 and expects to be able to comply with the
NOX requirement using its existing SCR system. The Pennsylvania CAIR, including both NOX and SO2 limits, is expected to become effective in 2010. EME Homer City
expects to comply with Pennsylvania CAIR through the continued operation of its scrubber on Unit 3 to reduce SO2 emissions and the purchase of SO2 allowances.

Mercury Regulation

By means of a rule published in May 2005, the US EPA established the CAMR, which created the framework for a national, market-based cap-and-trade program
to reduce mercury emissions from existing coal-fired power plants to a national cap of 38 tons by 2010 and to 15 tons by 2018, primarily through reductions in mercury achieved by
lowering SO2 and NOX emissions under the CAIR. States were allowed, but not required, to join the trading program by adopting the CAMR model trading rules. States retained the
right to promulgate alternative regulations equivalent to or more stringent than the CAMR cap-and-trade program, as long as the regulations were approved by the US EPA.

At
the time that it published the CAMR, the US EPA also published a second rule, formally rescinding its previous finding that mercury emissions from electrical generating facilities had
to be

42

---



regulated
as a hazardous air pollutant pursuant to Section 112 of the CAA, which would have imposed technology-based standards on emission sources. Both the CAMR and US EPA's decision to remove
oil and coal-fired plants from the list of sources to be regulated under Section 112 of the CAA were challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit by various environmental
groups and state attorneys general.

On
February 8, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated both rules and remanded the matter to the US EPA. As a result, until the US EPA takes further action in
response to the remand, coal-fired electric generating facilities continue to be sources subject to regulation under Section 112 of the CAA and will be obligated to comply, on a
case-by-case basis, with technology-based standards to control emissions of hazardous air pollutants (not necessarily limited to mercury) in accordance with the requirements of
Section 112. As described below, the Homer City facilities are already subject to significant unit-specific mercury emission reduction requirements under Pennsylvania law. EME Homer
City is assessing the potential impact of this decision on the Pennsylvania regulations, including whether these regulations will turn out to be more or less stringent than
case-by-case maximum achievable control technology (also known as MACT) standards or MACT standards that may eventually be promulgated by the US EPA.

On
February 17, 2007, the PADEP published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin regulations that would require coal-fired power plants to reduce mercury emissions by 80% by
2010 and 90% by 2015. The rule does not allow the use of emissions trading to achieve compliance. The rule became final upon publication. The Pennsylvania CAMR SIP, which embodies PADEP's mercury
regulation, was pending approval by the US EPA prior to the February 8, 2008 Court of Appeals decision vacating the federal CAMR.

At
this time, EME Homer City expects its facilities to achieve compliance by the 2010 deadline with mercury removal achieved by an existing flue gas desulfurization system on one
generating unit and by sorbent injection and coal washing on the other two units. In order to meet reductions in emissions by the 2015 deadline, it is likely that additional environmental control
equipment will need to be installed. If additional environmental equipment is required in the form of flue gas desulfurization equipment, EME Homer City would need to make commitments during 2011 or
2012. EME Homer City continues to study available environmental control technologies and estimated costs to reduce SO2 and mercury and to monitor developments related to mercury and other
environmental regulations.

Ambient Air Quality Standards

The US EPA designated non-attainment areas for its 8-hour ozone standard on April 30, 2004, and for its fine particulate matter
standard on January 5, 2005. Indiana County, the location of the Homer City facilities, is in a non-attainment area for both standards.

On
September 22, 2006 the US EPA issued a final rule that implements the revisions to its fine particulate standard originally proposed on January 17, 2006. Under the new
rule, the annual standard remains the same as originally proposed but the 24-hour fine particulate standard is significantly more stringent. The rule may require states to impose further
emission reductions beyond those necessary to meet the existing standards. EME Homer City anticipates that any such further emissions reduction obligations would not be imposed under this standard
until 2015 at the earliest, and intends to consider such rules as part of its overall plan for environmental compliance.

On
July 11, 2007 the US EPA issued a proposed rule to make revisions to the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards for ozone. With regard to the primary
standard for

43

---



ozone,
the US EPA proposes to reduce the level of the 8-hour standard to a level within the range of 0.070 to 0.075 parts per million (ppm). The US EPA solicited comment on alternative
levels down to 0.060 ppm and up to and including retaining the current 8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm (effectively 0.084 ppm using current data rounding conventions). The rule may require
states to impose further emission reductions beyond those necessary to meet the existing standards. EME Homer City anticipates that any such further emission reduction obligations would not be imposed
under this standard until 2015 at the earliest, and intends to consider such rules as part of its overall plan for environmental compliance.

In
June 2007, the PADEP requested a redesignation of Clearfield and Indiana counties to attainment with respect to the 8-hour ozone standard. The PADEP also submitted a
maintenance plan indicating that the existing (and upcoming) regulations controlling emissions of volatile organic compounds and NOx will result in continued compliance with the
8-hour ozone standard. Accordingly, EME Homer City believes that the Homer City facilities will likely not need to install additional pollution control as a result of the
8-hour ozone standard.

With
respect to fine particulates, Pennsylvania has not proposed new regulations to achieve compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulates. The SIP with
respect to this standard is due to the US EPA by April 5, 2008. Although the final form of the SIP is not yet known, at this time, EME Homer City does not anticipate that it will be required to
install additional pollution controls at the Homer City facilities to meet the expected SIP requirements for fine particulates.

Regional Haze

In July 1999, the US EPA published the "Regional Haze Rule" to reduce haze and protect visibility in designated federal areas. The goal of the 1999 rule is to
restore visibility in mandatory federal Class I areas, such as national parks and wilderness areas, to natural background conditions by 2064. Sources such as power plants that are reasonably
anticipated to contribute to visibility impairment in Class I areas may be required to install best available retrofit technology (BART) or implement other control strategies to meet regional
haze control requirements. The US EPA issued a final rulemaking on regional haze on June 15, 2005. States were required to revise their SIPs by December 2007 to demonstrate reasonable further
progress towards meeting regional haze goals. Emission reductions achieved through other ongoing control programs may be sufficient to demonstrate reasonable progress toward the long-term
goal, particularly for the first 10 to 15 year phase of the program. It is possible that sources subject to the CAIR will be able to satisfy their obligations under the regional haze
regulations through compliance with the CAIR. However, until the SIPs are revised, EME Homer City
cannot predict whether it will be required to install BART or implement other control strategies, and cannot identify the financial impacts of any additional control requirements.

In
Pennsylvania, the PADEP considers the CAIR to meet the BART requirements, and the Homer City facilities are only required to consider reductions in emissions of suspended particulate
matter (PM10), which at this time are being evaluated by the state.

New Source Review Requirements

Since 1999, the US EPA has pursued a coordinated compliance and enforcement strategy to address CAA NSR compliance issues at the nation's coal-fired
power plants. The NSR regulations impose certain requirements on facilities, such as electric generating stations, if modifications are made to air emissions sources at a facility. The US EPA's
strategy has included both the filing of suits against a number of power plant owners, and the issuance of administrative notices of violation to a number of power plant

44

---



owners
alleging NSR violations. EME Homer City has not been named as a defendant in these lawsuits and has not received any administrative Notices of Violation alleging NSR violations at its
facilities.

Prior
to EME Homer City's purchase of the Homer City facilities, the US EPA requested information under Section 114 of the CAA from the prior owners of the plant concerning
physical changes at the plant. This request was part of the US EPA's industry-wide investigation of compliance by coal-fired plants with the CAA NSR requirements. Other than
this request for information, no NSR enforcement-related proceedings have been initiated by the US EPA with respect to any of EME Homer City's facilities.

Water Quality Regulation

Regulations under the federal Clean Water Act require permits for the discharge of pollutants into United States waters and permits for the discharge of storm
water flows from certain facilities. The Clean Water Act also regulates the thermal component (heat) of effluent discharges and the location, design, and construction of cooling water intake
structures at generating facilities.

Clean Water ActCooling Water Intake Structures

On July 9, 2004, the US EPA published the final Phase II rule implementing Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act establishing standards for
cooling water intake structures at existing large power plants. The purpose of the regulation was to reduce substantially the number of aquatic organisms that are pinned against cooling water intake
structures or drawn into cooling water systems. Pursuant to the regulation, a demonstration study was required when applying for a new or renewed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit. If one could demonstrate that the costs of meeting the presumptive standards set forth in the regulation were significantly greater than the costs that the US EPA
assumed in its rule making or are significantly disproportionate to the expected environmental benefits, a site-specific analysis could be performed to establish alternative standards.
Depending on the findings of the demonstration studies, cooling towers and/or other mechanical means of reducing impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms could have been required.

On
January 27, 2007, the Second Circuit rejected the US EPA rule and remanded it to the US EPA. Among the key provisions remanded by the court were the use of cost benefit and
restoration to achieve compliance with the rule. On July 9, 2007, the US EPA suspended the requirements for cooling water intake structures, pending further rulemaking. The US EPA is expected
to begin another rulemaking process by the end of 2008. Although the rule to be generated in the new rulemaking process could have a material impact on EME Homer City's operations, its compliance
criteria have not yet been finalized, and EME Homer City cannot reasonably determine the financial impact at this time.

The
discharge from the treatment plant receiving the wastewater stream from EME Homer City's Unit 3 flue gas desulfurization system has exceeded the stringent water-quality based limits
for selenium in the station's NPDES permit. As a result, EME Homer City was notified in April 2002 by the PADEP that it was included in the Quarterly Noncompliance Report submitted to the US EPA. With
the PADEP's approval, EME Homer City has undertaken a pilot program utilizing biological treatment. EME Homer City and the PADEP have entered into a consent order and agreement related to selenium
discharge, which was entered by the Pennsylvania state court on July 17, 2007. Under the consent order and agreement, EME Homer City paid a civil penalty of $200,000 and agreed to install
modifications to its wastewater system to achieve consistent compliance with discharge limits. EME Homer City has operated the wastewater treatment system for twelve months without a selenium
exceedance. At this time, EME

45

---



Homer
City expects to remain in compliance and consequently does not expect to install additional treatment systems.

Hazardous Substances and Hazardous Waste Laws

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of any facility, including an electric
generating facility, may be required to investigate and remediate releases or threatened releases of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products located at that facility, and may be held
liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, natural resource damages, and investigation and remediation costs incurred by these parties in connection with
these releases or threatened releases. Many of these laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, commonly referred to as CERCLA, as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of or caused the presence of the hazardous substances, and courts have interpreted
liability under these laws to be strict and joint and several.

Climate Change

Federal Legislative Initiatives

To date, the United States has pursued a voluntary GHG emissions reduction program to meet its obligations as a signatory to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. As a result of increased attention to climate change in the U.S., however, numerous bills have been introduced in the current session of the U.S. Congress that would
reduce GHG emissions in the U.S. Enactment of climate change legislation within the next several years may occur. However, there is still significant uncertainty about the cost of complying with any
future GHG emission requirements. These costs will depend upon many factors, including the required levels of GHG emission reductions, the timing of those reductions, whether emission credits will be
allocated with or without cost to existing generators, and whether flexible compliance mechanisms, such as a GHG offset program similar to those sanctioned under the CAA for conventional pollutants,
will be part of the policy.

In
most of the federal proposals to date, emission allowances would be allocated and distributed without cost in the early years of the emission reduction program, followed by decreasing
free allocations and increasing auctions of allowances. While debate continues at the national level over domestic climate policy and the appropriate scope and terms of any federal legislation, many
states are developing state-specific measures or participating in regional legislative initiatives to reduce GHG emissions. At this point, EME Homer City is unable to determine whether any of these
proposals will be enacted into law or to estimate their potential effect on EME Homer City.

Regional Legislative Initiatives

On December 20, 2005, seven northeastern states entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to create a regional initiative to establish a
cap-and-trade GHG program for electric generators, referred to as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). In August 2006, the participating states issued a model rule to
be used as a basis for individual state legislative and regulatory action to implement the program. Pennsylvania is not a signatory to the RGGI, although it participated as an observer of the process.

Implementing
regulations for regional initiatives may be more stringent and costly than federal legislative proposals currently being debated in Congress. It cannot yet be determined
whether or to what extent any federal legislative system would preempt regional or state initiatives, although such

46

---



preemption
would greatly simplify compliance and eliminate regulatory duplication. If state and/or regional initiatives are allowed to stand together with federal legislation, generators could be
required to purchase allowances to satisfy their state and federal compliance obligations.

Litigation Developments

The speed with which federal regulations and legislation will be adopted will depend in part on decisions rendered in climate change litigation pending before
several federal and state courts and the US EPA's response to those decisions. For example, on April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency,
et. al., ruling that the US EPA has the authority to regulate GHG emissions of new motor
vehicles under the CAA and that it has a duty to (i) determine whether GHG emissions of new motor vehicles contribute to climate change or (ii) offer a reasoned explanation for its
failure to make such a determination when presented with a request for a rulemaking on the issue by the state claimants. The Court ruled that the US EPA's failure to make the necessary determination
or offer a reasonable explanation for its refusal to do so was impermissible. While this case hinged on a provision of the CAA related to emissions of motor vehicles, a parallel provision of the CAA
applies to stationary sources such as electric generators, and there is litigation pending in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,Coke Oven Task Force v. Environmental
Protection Agency, in which the holding inMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,may be applied to
stationary sources such as power plants.

In
2004, several states and environmental organizations brought a complaint in federal court in New York, alleging that several electric utility corporations are jointly and severally
liable under a theory of public nuisance for damages caused by the alleged contribution to global warming resulting from carbon
dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants owned and operated by these companies or their subsidiaries. EME Homer City was not named as a defendant in the complaint. The case was
dismissed and is currently on appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In another case brought in April 2006, private citizens filed a complaint in the federal court in
Mississippi against numerous defendants, including several electric utilities, arguing that emissions from the defendants' facilities contributed to climate change and seeking monetary damages related
to the 2005 hurricane season. In August 2007, the court dismissed the case entirely. The plaintiffs have appealed this dismissal in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

On
October 18, 2007, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment rejected a permit to construct two proposed coal-fired electrical generators based on the impact
to health and the environment arising from the proposed units' emissions of carbon dioxide. This was the first reported rejection of a proposed coal plant permit based on a clean air statute. This
decision has been appealed. In addition, there are a number of pending cases in which environmental groups are arguing that air permits for the construction of major coal-fired generating
facilities cannot be issued unless the permits include best available control technology to control carbon dioxide emissions. The US EPA has taken the position that such controls are not required
until it finalizes regulations relating to carbon dioxide emissions.

The
ultimate outcome of the climate change debate could have a significant economic effect on EME Homer City. Any legal obligation that would require EME Homer City to reduce
substantially its emissions of carbon dioxide or that would impose additional costs or charges for the emission of carbon dioxide could have a materially adverse effect on EME Homer City. EME Homer
City will continue to monitor the federal, regional and state developments relating to regulation of GHG emissions to determine their impact on its operations. Requirements to reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions could significantly increase the cost of generating electricity from fossil fuels, especially coal, as well as the cost of purchased power.

47

---





MARKET RISK EXPOSURES

Introduction

EME Homer City's primary market risk exposures arise from fluctuations in electricity, capacity and fuel prices, emission allowances and transmission rights. EME
Homer City manages these risks in part by using derivative financial instruments in accordance with established policies and procedures.

This
section discusses these market risk exposures under the following headings:

PageCommodity Price Risk

48Accounting for Energy Contracts

54Derivative Financial Instruments

55Credit Risk

56Interest Rate Risk

57


Commodity Price Risk

Overview

EME Homer City's revenues and results of operations will depend upon prevailing market prices for capacity, energy, ancillary services, emission allowances or
credits, coal, natural gas and fuel oil, and associated transportation costs in PJM and in NYISO. Among the factors that influence future market prices for energy, capacity and ancillary services in
PJM and NYISO are:

48

---



Introduction

EME Homer City sells all its energy and capacity into wholesale power markets through EMMT. EMMT enters into forward contracts for EME Homer City's electric
output in order to provide more predictable earnings and cash flow. When appropriate, EMMT manages the spread between electric prices and fuel prices through the use of forward contracts, swaps,
futures, or options contracts. There is no assurance that contracts to hedge changes in market prices will be effective.

EME
Homer City's operations expose it to commodity price risk, which represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the market value of a particular commodity. Commodity
price risks are actively monitored by a risk management committee to ensure compliance with EME Homer City's risk management policies through EMMT. Policies are in place which define risk management
processes, and procedures exist which allow for monitoring of all commitments and positions with regular reviews by a
risk management committee. Despite this, there can be no assurance that all risks have been accurately identified, measured and/or mitigated.

In
addition to prevailing market prices, EME Homer City's ability to derive profits from the sale of electricity will be affected by the cost of production, including costs incurred to
comply with environmental regulations. The costs of production of the units vary and, accordingly, depending on market conditions, the amount of generation that will be sold from the units is expected
to vary.

EMMT
uses "earnings at risk" to identify, measure, monitor and control EME Homer City's overall market risk exposure with respect to hedge positions at the Homer City facilities. The use
of this measure allows management to aggregate overall commodity risk, compare risk on a consistent basis and identify the risk factors. Earnings at risk measures the potential change in value of an
asset or position, in each case over a given time interval, under normal market conditions, at a given confidence level. Given the inherent limitations of this measure and reliance on a single risk
measurement tool, EMMT supplements this approach with the use of stress testing and worst-case scenario analysis for key risk factors, as well as stop-loss limits and
counterparty credit exposure limits.

Hedging Strategy

To reduce its exposure to market risk, EME Homer City hedges a portion of its merchant portfolio risk through EMMT. To the extent that EME Homer City does not
hedge its merchant portfolio, the unhedged portion will be subject to the risks and benefits of spot market price movements. Hedge transactions are primarily implemented through:

The
extent to which EME Homer City hedges its market price risk depends on several factors. First, EME Homer City evaluates over-the-counter market prices to
determine whether the types of hedge transactions set forth above at forward market prices are sufficiently attractive compared to assuming the risk associated with fluctuating spot market sales.
Second, EME Homer City's ability to enter into hedging transactions depends upon EMMT's credit capacity and upon the forward sales markets having sufficient liquidity to enable EME Homer City to
identify appropriate counterparties for hedging transactions.

49

---



Energy Price Risk

All the energy and capacity from the Homer City facilities is sold under terms, including price and quantity, arranged by EMMT with customers through a
combination of bilateral agreements (resulting from negotiations or from auctions), forward energy sales and spot market sales. Electric power generated at the Homer City facilities is generally sold
into the PJM market. PJM has a short-term market, which establishes an hourly clearing price. The Homer City facilities are situated in the PJM control area and are physically connected to
high-voltage transmission lines serving both the PJM and NYISO markets.

The
following table depicts the average historical market prices for energy per megawatt-hour at the Homer City busbar and in PJM West Hub (EME Homer City's primary trading
hub) during the past three years:

|               |  | Historical Energy Prices(1)
24-Hour PJM
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|
|
|January        |  | $                                      
|February       |  |                                        
|March          |  |                                        
|April          |  |                                        
|May            |  |                                        
|June           |  |                                        
|July           |  |                                        
|August         |  |                                        
|September      |  |                                        
|October        |  |                                        
|November       |  |                                        
|December       |  |                                        
|               |  |                                        
|Yearly Average |  | $                                      
|               |  |                                        

---

Forward market prices at the PJM West Hub fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including natural gas prices, transmission congestion,
changes in market rules, electricity demand (which in turn is affected by weather, economic growth and other factors), plant outages in the region, and the amount of existing and planned power plant
capacity. The actual spot prices for electricity delivered by the Homer City facilities into these markets may vary materially from the forward market prices set forth in the table below.

50

---



The
following table sets forth the forward month-end market prices for energy per megawatt-hour for the calendar year 2008 and calendar year 2009 "strips," which
are defined as energy purchases for the entire calendar year, as quoted for sales into the PJM West Hub during 2007:

24-Hour PJM West Hub
Forward Energy Prices(1)2008

2009January 31, 2007

$
58.09

$
56.40February 28, 2007


59.33


57.96March 31, 2007


63.37


61.44April 30, 2007


65.73


64.37May 31, 2007


66.57


65.97June 30, 2007


62.36


64.07July 31, 2007


62.89


64.89August 31, 2007


58.96


62.45September 30, 2007


61.71


64.53October 31, 2007


65.97


67.92November 30, 2007


62.14


65.89December 31, 2007


62.49


67.13


---

The following table summarizes EME Homer City's hedge position at December 31, 2007:

2008

2009

2010MWh


7,232,000


2,867,200


1,022,400Average price/MWh(1)

$
60.85

$
73.84

$
77.80


---

The average price/MWh for EME Homer City's hedge position is based on PJM West Hub. Energy prices at the Homer City busbar have been lower than
energy prices at the PJM West Hub. See "Basis Risk" below for a discussion of the difference.

Capacity Price Risk

On June 1, 2007, PJM implemented the RPM for capacity. The purpose of the RPM is to provide a long-term pricing signal for capacity resources.
The RPM provides a mechanism for PJM to satisfy the region's need for generation capacity, the cost of which is allocated to load-serving entities through a locational reliability charge.

51

---



The
following table summarizes the status of capacity sales for EME Homer City at December 31, 2007:

January 1, 2008 to May 31, 2008

June 1, 2008 to May 31, 2009

June 1, 2009 to May 31, 2010Fixed Price Capacity SalesMW


786


820


1,670Price per MW-day

$
40.80

$
111.92

$
191.32Variable Capacity SalesMW


891


891


Price per MW-day

$
66.71
(1)
$
69.50
(2)




---

In January 2008, the RPM auction took place for the time period from June 1, 2010 through May 31, 2011 which resulted in a fixed
price for EME Homer City's capacity sold into the auction of $174.29/MW-day. EMMT sold net 1,813 MW of capacity from the Homer City facilities.

Revenues
from the sale of capacity from EME Homer City beyond the periods set forth above will depend upon the amount of capacity available and future market prices either in PJM or
nearby markets if EME Homer City has an opportunity to capture a higher value associated with those markets. Under PJM's RPM system, the market price for capacity is generally determined by aggregate
market-based supply conditions and an administratively set aggregate demand curve. Among the factors influencing the supply of capacity in any particular market are plant forced outage rates, plant
closings, plant delistings (due to plants being removed as capacity resources and/or to export capacity to other markets), capacity imports from other markets, and the cost of new entry.

Prior
to the RPM auctions for the relevant delivery periods, EME Homer City sold a portion of its capacity to an unrelated third party for the delivery periods from June 1, 2007
through May 31, 2008 and June 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009. EME Homer City is not receiving the RPM auction clearing price for this previously sold capacity. The price EME Homer
City is receiving for these capacity sales is a function of NYISO capacity clearing prices resulting from separate NYISO capacity auctions.

Basis Risk

Sales made from the Homer City facilities in the real-time or day-ahead market receive the actual spot prices or day-ahead
prices, as the case may be, at the Homer City busbar. In order to mitigate price risk from changes in spot prices at the Homer City busbar, EME Homer City may enter into cash settled futures contracts
as well as forward contracts with counterparties for energy to be delivered in future periods. Currently, a liquid market for entering into these contracts at the Homer City busbar does not exist. A
liquid market does exist at the PJM West Hub. EME Homer City's hedging activities use this settlement point to enter into hedging contracts. EME Homer City's revenues with respect to such forward
contracts include:

52

---



Under
PJM's market design, locational marginal pricing, which establishes market prices at specific locations throughout PJM by considering factors including generator bids, load
requirements, transmission congestion and losses, can cause the price of a specific delivery point to be higher or lower relative to other locations depending on how the point is affected by
transmission constraints. Effective June 1, 2007, PJM implemented marginal losses which adjusts the algorithm that calculates locational marginal prices to include a component for marginal
transmission losses in addition to the component included for congestion. To the extent that, on the settlement date of a hedge contract, spot prices at the relevant busbar are lower than spot prices
at the settlement point, the proceeds actually realized from the related hedge contract are effectively reduced by the difference. This is referred to as "basis risk." During 2007, transmission
congestion in PJM has resulted in prices at the Homer City busbar being lower than those at the PJM West Hub by an average of 15%, compared to 12% during 2006 and 10% during 2005. The monthly average
difference during 2007 ranged from 10% to 24%.

By
entering into cash settled futures contracts and forward contracts using the PJM West Hub as the settlement point, EME Homer City is exposed to basis risk as described above. In order
to mitigate basis risk, EME Homer City may purchase financial transmission rights and basis swaps in PJM for EME Homer City. A financial transmission right is a financial instrument that entitles the
holder to receive the difference of actual spot prices for two delivery points in exchange for a fixed amount. Accordingly, EME Homer City's hedging activities include using financial transmission
rights alone or in combination with forward contracts and basis swap contracts to manage basis risk.

Coal Price Risk

The Homer City facilities purchase coal primarily obtained from mines located near the facilities in Pennsylvania. Coal purchases are made under a variety of
supply agreements extending through 2010. The following table summarizes the amount of coal under contract at December 31, 2007 for the next three years.

2008

2009

2010Amount of coal under contract in millions of tons(1)

5.7

4.4

0.3


---

EME Homer City is subject to price risk for purchases of coal that are not under contract. Prices of NAPP coal, which are related to the price of
coal purchased for the Homer City facilities, increased steadily during 2007 and decreased slightly in 2006 from 2005. The price of NAPP coal (with 13,000 Btu per pound heat content and
<3.0 pounds of SO2 per MMBtu sulfur content) ranged from $44.00 per ton to $55.25 per ton during 2007 and increased to a price of $70.00 per ton at February 15, 2008, as
reported by the EIA. The 2007 increase in the NAPP coal price was in line with normal market price volatility. In 2006, the price of NAPP coal fluctuated between $37.50 per ton and $45.00 per ton,
with a price of $43.00 per ton at December 15, 2006, as reported by the EIA. In 2005, the price of NAPP coal fluctuated between $44.00 per ton and $57.00 per ton, with a price of $45.00 per ton
at December 30, 2005, as reported by the EIA. The 2006 decrease in the NAPP coal price was largely due to the combined effects of mild weather, easing natural gas prices and improving eastern
stockpiles.

53

---



Emission Allowances Price Risk

The federal Acid Rain Program requires electric generating stations to hold SO2 allowances, and Pennsylvania regulations implemented the federal
NOX SIP Call requirement. As part of the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City obtained the rights to the emission allowances that have been or are allocated to these
facilities. EME Homer City purchases (or sells) emission allowances based on the amounts required for actual generation in excess of (or less than) the amounts allocated under these programs.

The
average price of purchased SO2 allowances was $512 per ton during 2007, $664 per ton during 2006 and $1,219 per ton during 2005. The decrease in the price of
SO2 allowances during 2007 from 2006 year-end prices has been attributed to less demand in the market for SO2 allowances. The 2006 decrease in the price of
SO2 allowances has been attributed to a decline in natural gas prices and fuel switching from oil to gas. The price of SO2 allowances, determined by obtaining broker quotes and
information from other public sources, was $535 per ton as of December 31, 2007. EME Homer City does not anticipate any requirements to purchase SO2 emission allowances in 2008. See
"Liquidity and
Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters and Regulations" for a discussion of environmental regulations related to emissions.

Accounting for Energy Contracts

EME Homer City uses a number of energy contracts to manage exposure from changes in the price of electricity, including forward sales and purchases of physical
power and forward price swaps which settle only on a financial basis (including futures contracts). EME Homer City follows SFAS No. 133, and under this Standard these energy contracts are
generally defined as derivative financial instruments. Importantly, SFAS No. 133 requires changes in the fair value of each derivative financial instrument to be recognized in earnings at the
end of each accounting period unless the instrument qualifies for hedge accounting under the terms of SFAS No. 133. For derivatives that do qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, changes in
their fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item settles and is recognized in earnings. However, the ineffective portion of a derivative that qualifies for cash flow
hedge accounting is recognized currently in earnings. For further discussion of derivative financial instruments, see "Management's Overview; Critical Accounting PoliciesCritical
Accounting PoliciesDerivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities."

SFAS
No. 133 affects the timing of income recognition, but has no effect on cash flow. To the extent that income varies under SFAS No. 133 from accrual accounting
(i.e., revenue recognition based on settlement of transactions), EME Homer City records unrealized gains or losses. Unrealized SFAS No. 133 gains or losses result from:

  the
change in fair value (sometimes called mark-to-market) of economic hedges that relate to subsequent periods, and

  offsetting
amounts to the realized gains and losses in the period non-qualifying hedges are settled.

54

---



  the
current period ineffectiveness on the hedge program for subsequent periods. This occurs because the ineffective gains or losses are recorded in the
current period, whereby the energy revenues related to generation being hedged will be recorded in the subsequent period along with the effective portion of the related hedge transaction, and

  offsetting
amounts to the realized ineffective gains and losses in the period cash flow hedges are settled.

EME
Homer City classifies unrealized gains and losses from energy contracts as part of operating revenues. The results of derivative activities are recorded as part of cash flow from
operating activities in the statement of cash flow. The following table summarizes unrealized gains (losses) for the three-year period ended December 31, 2007:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in millions)Non-qualifying hedges

$
(1.0
)
$
1.6

$
(1.3
)Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges


(8.8
)

32.7


(40.3
)Total unrealized gains (losses)

$
(9.8
)
$
34.3

$
(41.6
)


At December 31, 2007, unrealized losses of $20.9 million were recognized primarily from the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges
related to subsequent periods ($12.1 million for 2008, $6.9 million for 2009, and $1.9 million for 2010).

Derivative Financial Instruments

The following table summarizes the fair values for outstanding financial instruments used for hedging activities. The change in fair value of electricity
contracts at December 31, 2007 as compared to December 31, 2006 is attributable to an increase in the average market prices for power as compared to contracted prices at
December 31, 2007, which is the valuation date.

December 31, 2007

December 31, 2006(in thousands)Commodity price:Electricity contracts

$
(45,676
)
$
89,099


In assessing the fair value of EME Homer City's derivative financial instruments, EMMT uses a variety of methods and assumptions based on the
market conditions and associated risks existing at each balance sheet date. The fair value of commodity price contracts takes into account quoted market prices, time value of money, volatility of the
underlying commodities and other factors. A 10% change in the market price at December 31, 2007 would increase or decrease the fair value of outstanding derivative commodity price contracts by
approximately $74 million. The following table summarizes the maturities

55

---



and
the related fair value, based on actively traded prices, of EME Homer City's commodity derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2007 (in thousands):

Total Fair Value

Maturity < 1 year

Maturity
1 to 3
years

Maturity
4 to 5
years

Maturity > 5 yearsPrices actively quoted

$
(45,676
)
$
(15,089
)
$
(30,587
)
$


$



Credit Risk

In conducting EME Homer City's hedging activities, EMMT contracts with a number of utilities, energy companies, financial institutions, and other companies,
collectively referred to as counterparties. In the event a counterparty were to default on its trade obligation, EME Homer City would be exposed to the risk of possible loss associated with
re-contracting the product at a price different from
the original contracted price if the non-performing counterparty were unable to pay the resulting liquidated damages owed to EME Homer City. Further, EME Homer City would be exposed to the
risk of non-payment of accounts receivable accrued for products delivered prior to the time a counterparty defaulted.

To
manage credit risk, EMMT looks at the risk of a potential default by counterparties. Credit risk is measured by the loss that would be incurred if counterparties failed to perform
pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. EMMT measures, monitors and mitigates credit risk to the extent possible. To mitigate credit risk from counterparties, master netting agreements
are used whenever possible and counterparties may be required to pledge collateral when deemed necessary. EMMT also takes other appropriate steps to limit or lower credit exposure. Processes have also
been established to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties. EMMT manages the credit risk on the portfolio based on credit ratings using published ratings of counterparties and
other publicly disclosed information, such as financial statements, regulatory filings, and press releases, to guide it in the process of setting credit levels, risk limits and contractual
arrangements, including master netting agreements. A risk management committee regularly reviews the credit quality of EMMT's counterparties. Despite this, there can be no assurance that these efforts
will be wholly successful in mitigating credit risk or that collateral pledged will be adequate.

In
addition, coal for the Homer City facilities is purchased from suppliers under contracts which may be for multiple years. A number of the coal suppliers to the Homer City facilities
do not currently have an investment grade credit rating and, accordingly, EME Homer City may have limited recourse to collect damages in the event of default by a supplier. EME Homer City seeks to
mitigate this risk through diversification of its coal suppliers and through guarantees and other collateral arrangements when available. Despite this, there can be no assurance that these efforts
will be successful in mitigating credit risk from coal suppliers.

EME
Homer City derives a significant source of its operating revenues from electric power sold into the PJM market by EMMT. Sales into PJM accounted for approximately 70% of EME Homer
City's operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007. Moody's rates PJM's senior unsecured debt Aa3. PJM, an ISO with over 300 member companies, maintains its own credit risk policies
and does not extend unsecured credit to non-investment grade companies. Any losses due to a PJM member default are shared by all other members based upon a predetermined formula. For the
year ended December 31, 2007, a second customer accounted for 11% of EME Homer City's operating revenues.

56

---



Interest Rate Risk

EME Homer City has mitigated the risk of interest rate fluctuations by obtaining fixed rate financing on its subordinated revolving loan with Edison Mission
Finance. EME Homer City does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Information responding to Item 7A is filed with this report under "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations."

57

---





ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

|Financial Statements: |                                                                                                | 
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                                        | 
|                      | Statements of Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005               | 
|                      | Balance Sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006                                                   | 
|                      | Statements of Partners' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005            | 
|                      | Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 | 
|                      | Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005                  | 
|                      | Notes to Financial Statements                                                                  | 

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

EME Homer City's management, with the participation of the partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of EME Homer City's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of the end of the period, EME Homer City's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

EME Homer City's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of the partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, EME Homer City's management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of EME Homer City's internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth inInternal
ControlIntegrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its evaluation under the COSO
framework, EME Homer City's management concluded that EME Homer City's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were changes as described below in EME Homer City's internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, EME Homer City's internal
control over financial reporting.

58

---



During
2007, EME Homer City implemented a series of SAP ERP modules, including the general ledger, chart of accounts, consolidation, reporting, and accounts payable. In addition,
procurement and materials management and fuel management systems were implemented at the Homer City facilities. The introduction of these ERP modules and the related workflow capabilities resulted in
changes to EME Homer City's financial reporting controls and procedures, with such changes identified during the implementation of the ERP modules. EME Homer City has modified the design and
documentation of internal control processes and procedures relating to the new system to supplement and complement existing internal controls over financial reporting. The system changes were
undertaken to integrate systems and consolidate information, and were not undertaken in response to any actual or perceived deficiencies in EME Homer City's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9A(T).    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

This annual report does not include an attestation report of EME Homer City's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by EME Homer City's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that permit EME Homer City to provide only management's report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

59

---





EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To
the General Partner of EME Homer City Generation L.P.:

In
our opinion, the financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EME Homer City Generation L.P. at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Partnership changed the manner in which it accounts for uncertain tax positions as of January 1, 2007. As discussed
in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Partnership changed the manner in which it accounts for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans as of December 31, 2006.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 27, 2008

60

---





EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)  (In thousands)

|                                            |                                            | Years Ended December 31, |        
|------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | -------
|
|Operating Revenues from Marketing Affiliate |                                            | $                        | 763,747
|Operating Expenses                          |                                            |                          |        
|                                            | Fuel                                       |                          |        
|                                            | Loss (gain) on sale of emission allowances |                          |        
|                                            | Plant operations                           |                          |        
|                                            | Depreciation and amortization              |                          |        
|                                            | Loss on asset impairment and other charges |                          |        
|                                            | Loss (gain) on disposal of assets          |                          |        
|                                            | Administrative and general                 |                          |        
|                                            |                                            |                          |        
|                                            |                                            | Total operating expenses |        
|                                            |                                            |                          |        
|Operating income                            |                                            |                          | 272,936
|                                            |                                            |                          |        
|Other Income (Expense)                      |                                            |                          |        
|                                            | Interest and other income                  |                          |        
|                                            | Interest expense                           |                          |        
|                                            |                                            |                          |        
|                                            |                                            | Total other expense      |        
|                                            |                                            |                          |        
|Income (loss) before income taxes           |                                            |                          | 142,572
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes        |                                            |                          | 54,441 
|                                            |                                            |                          |        
|Net Income (Loss)                           |                                            | $                        | 88,131 
|                                            |                                            |                          |        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

61

---



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  BALANCE SHEETS  (In thousands)

|                                        |                                                | December 31,                     
|--------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------
|
|Assets                                  |                                                |                                  
|Current Assets                          |                                                |                                  
|                                        | Cash and cash equivalents                      |                                  
|                                        | Due from affiliates                            |                                  
|                                        | Fuel inventory                                 |                                  
|                                        | Spare parts inventory                          |                                  
|                                        | Deposits under lease swap agreement            |                                  
|                                        | Derivative assets                              |                                  
|                                        | Deferred taxes                                 |                                  
|                                        | Intangible assets                              |                                  
|                                        | Other current assets                           |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                | Total current assets             
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Property, Plant and Equipment           |                                                |                                  
|                                        | Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                | Net property, plant and equipment
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Deferred taxes                          |                                                |                                  
|Restricted cash                         |                                                |                                  
|Trust deposits                          |                                                |                                  
|Long-term derivative assets             |                                                |                                  
|Long-term intangible assets             |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Total Assets                            |                                                | $                                
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Liabilities and Partners' Equity        |                                                |                                  
|Current Liabilities                     |                                                |                                  
|                                        | Accounts payable                               |                                  
|                                        | Accrued liabilities                            |                                  
|                                        | Due to affiliates                              |                                  
|                                        | Interest payable                               |                                  
|                                        | Interest payable to affiliates                 |                                  
|                                        | Derivative liabilities                         |                                  
|                                        | Deferred taxes                                 |                                  
|                                        | Current portion of lease financing             |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                | Total current liabilities        
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Long-term debt to affiliate             |                                                |                                  
|Lease financing, net of current portion |                                                |                                  
|Benefit plans and other                 |                                                |                                  
|Long-term derivative liabilities        |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Total Liabilities                       |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Commitments and Contingencies(Note 8)   |                                                |                                  
|Partners' Equity                        |                                                |                                  
|                                        |                                                |                                  
|Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity  |                                                | $                                
|                                        |                                                |                                  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

62

---



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY  (In thousands)

|                             |                                                                                 | Chestnut Ridge Energy Company                                                               |         | Mission Energy Westside Inc. |          | Total
Partners' Equity |    
|---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------------------------- | -------- | ---------------------- | ---
|Balance at December 31, 2004 |                                                                                 | $                                                                                           | 57,139  |                              | $        | 879                    |    
|                             | Net loss                                                                        |                                                                                             |         | (11,095                      | )        |                        | (11
|                             | Unrealized losses on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|                             |                                                                                 | Other unrealized holding losses arising during period, net of income tax benefit of $37,307 |         |                              | (50,456  | )                      |    
|                             |                                                                                 | Reclassification adjustments included in net loss, net of income tax expense of $45,071     |         |                              | (61,632  | )                      |    
|                             |                                                                                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|Balance at December 31, 2005 |                                                                                 |                                                                                             | (66,044 | )                            |          | 755                    |    
|                             |                                                                                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|                             | Net income                                                                      |                                                                                             |         | 39,193                       |          |                        | 39 
|                             | Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of income tax benefit of $1,096 |                                                                                             |         | (1,500                       | )        |                        | (2 
|                             | Unrealized gains on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:                  |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|                             |                                                                                 | Other unrealized holding gains arising during period, net of income tax expense of $117,537 |         |                              | 160,834  |                        |    
|                             |                                                                                 | Reclassification adjustments included in net income, net of income tax benefit of $2,893    |         |                              | 3,960    |                        |    
|                             |                                                                                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|Balance at December 31, 2006 |                                                                                 |                                                                                             | 136,443 |                              |          | 957                    |    
|                             |                                                                                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|                             | Net income                                                                      |                                                                                             |         | 88,043                       |          |                        | 88 
|                             | SFAS No. 158 adjustment, net of tax expense of $1,297                           |                                                                                             |         | 1,775                        |          |                        | 2  
|                             | Unrealized losses on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges:                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|                             |                                                                                 | Other unrealized holding losses arising during period, net of income tax benefit of $84,744 |         |                              | (116,391 | )                      |    
|                             |                                                                                 | Reclassification adjustments included in net income, net of income tax benefit of $32,113   |         |                              | 44,105   |                        |    
|                             |                                                                                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    
|Balance at December 31, 2007 |                                                                                 | $                                                                                           | 153,975 |                              | $        | 975                    |    
|                             |                                                                                 |                                                                                             |         |                              |          |                        |    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

63

---



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)  (In thousands)

|                                               |                                                                         | Years Ended December 31,                                                                                                                                                      |        
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------
|
|Net Income (Loss)                              |                                                                         | $                                                                                                                                                                             | 88,131 
|Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                               |        
|                                               | Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions:                |                                                                                                                                                                               |        
|                                               |                                                                         | Prior service adjustment, net of tax                                                                                                                                          |        
|                                               |                                                                         | Amortization of prior service, net of tax                                                                                                                                     |        
|                                               |                                                                         | Net gain adjustment, net of tax                                                                                                                                               |        
|                                               |                                                                         | Amortization of net loss, net of tax benefit                                                                                                                                  |        
|                                               | Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges: |                                                                                                                                                                               |        
|                                               |                                                                         | Other unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $(84,744), $117,537 and $(37,307) for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively |        
|                                               |                                                                         | Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss), net of income tax expense (benefit) of $(32,113), $(2,893) and $45,071 for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively      |        
|                                               |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                               |        
|Other comprehensive income (loss)              |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                               | (70,581
|                                               |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                               |        
|Comprehensive Income (Loss)                    |                                                                         | $                                                                                                                                                                             | 17,550 
|                                               |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                               |        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

64

---



EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  (In thousands)

|                                                     |                                           | Years Ended December 31,                                                                 |                                           
|---------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|
|Cash Flows From Operating Activities                 |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     | Net income (loss)                         |                                                                                          | $                                         
|                                                     |                                           | Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          | Depreciation and amortization             
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          | Deferred taxes                            
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          | Loss on asset impairment and other charges
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          | Loss (gain) on asset disposal             
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          | Loss (gain) on sale of emission allowances
|                                                     |                                           | Increase in due to affiliates                                                            |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Decrease (increase) in inventory                                                         |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Decrease (increase) in other current assets                                              |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Decrease (increase) in intangible assets                                                 |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities                    |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Increase (decrease) in interest payable                                                  |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Increase (decrease) in other liabilities                                                 |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Decrease (increase) in derivative assets and liabilities                                 |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     | Net cash provided by operating activities |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|Cash Flows From Financing Activities                 |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Refund of deposit under lease swap agreement                                             |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Advances under lease swap agreement                                                      |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Payments under lease swap agreement                                                      |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Borrowings on long-term obligations from affiliates                                      |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Repayments to affiliates                                                                 |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Repayments of lease financing                                                            |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     | Net cash used in financing activities     |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|Cash Flows From Investing Activities                 |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Capital expenditures                                                                     |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Proceeds from sale of emission allowances                                                |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Proceeds from sale of assets                                                             |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Trust deposits                                                                           |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Proceeds from settlement claim                                                           |                                           
|                                                     |                                           | Restricted cash                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     | Net cash used in investing activities     |                                                                                          |                                           
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |                                           |                                                                                          | 28,533                                    
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     |                                           |                                                                                          | 113,839                                   
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period           |                                           | $                                                                                        | 142,372                                   
|                                                     |                                           |                                                                                          |                                           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

65

---





EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.  NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

EME Homer City is a Pennsylvania limited partnership between Chestnut Ridge Energy Company, as a limited partner with a 99.9 percent interest, and
Mission Energy Westside Inc., as a general partner with a 0.1 percent interest. Both Chestnut Ridge Energy and Mission Energy Westside are wholly owned subsidiaries of Edison Mission
Holdings Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of EME. EME is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Edison International. The partnership was formed on October 31, 1998 for the purpose of
acquiring, owning and operating three coal-fired electric generating units, and related facilities, which are referred to as the "Homer City facilities," located near Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania for the purpose of producing electric energy.

EME Homer
City derives revenue from the sale of energy, capacity and ancillary services into PJM and from bilateral contracts with power marketers and load-serving entities within
PJM. EME Homer City has entered into a contract with a marketing affiliate, EMMT, for the sale of energy, capacity and ancillary services from the Homer City facilities, which enables this
marketing affiliate to engage in forward sales and hedging transactions to manage electricity price exposure.

On
December 7, 2001, EME Homer City completed a sale-leaseback of the Homer City facilities to third-party lessors for an aggregate purchase price of
$1.591 billion, made up of $782 million in cash and assumption of debt (the fair value of which was $809.3 million). This transaction has been accounted for as a lease financing
for accounting purposes.

Basis of Presentation

Certain prior year reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year financial statement presentation.

The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires EME Homer City to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include time deposits and other investments totaling $37.4 million and $36.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, with original maturities of three months or less.

Derivative Instruments

SFAS No. 133 as amended and interpreted by other related accounting literature, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments
(including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts). SFAS No. 133 requires companies to record derivatives on their balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at
their fair value unless exempted from derivative treatment as a normal sale and purchase. EME Homer City's physical coal contracts did not qualify as derivatives under SFAS No. 133. All changes
in the fair value of derivatives are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met, which requires that a company must formally document, designate,

66

---



and
assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. The results of derivative activities are recorded as part of cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying
statements of cash flows.

SFAS
No. 133 sets forth the accounting requirements for cash flow hedges. SFAS No. 133 provides that the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument
designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument be reported as a component of other comprehensive income and be reclassified
into earnings in the same period during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, must be recognized currently in
earnings.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

EME Homer City evaluates the impairment of its long-lived assets based on a review of estimated future cash flows expected to be generated
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the amount of the expected future cash
flows, undiscounted and without interest charges, then an impairment loss for EME Homer City's long-lived assets is recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 144.

Income Taxes

EME Homer City has made an election to be taxed as a corporation for federal and California state tax purposes. EME Homer City is included in the
consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Edison International and is party to a tax-allocation agreement with its indirect parent, Edison Mission Holdings Co. As long as
Edison International continues to own, directly or indirectly, at least 80% of the voting power of the stock of EME and its existing subsidiaries and at least 80% of the value of such stock,
EME Homer City will be included in the consolidated federal and state income tax returns of Edison International. In accordance with the agreement and the tax-allocation procedures
in effect since EME Homer City's formation, its current tax liability or benefit is generally determined on a separate return basis, except for calculating consolidated state income taxes, for
which EME Homer City uses the state tax apportionment factors of the Edison International group. Also, while EME Homer City is generally subject to separate return limitations for net
losses, under the tax-allocation agreement EME Homer City is permitted to transfer to Edison Mission Holdings, or its subsidiaries, net operating loss benefits which would not yet
be realized in a separate return in exchange for a reduction in its intercompany account balances (including the subordinated revolving loan). EME Homer City also files a separate state
income tax return in Pennsylvania. Amounts included in due to affiliates on the balance sheet associated with this tax-allocation agreement totaled $91.4 million and
$25.6 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

EME Homer
City accounts for deferred income taxes using the asset-and-liability method, wherein deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates. At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City
had net federal and state deferred tax assets of $102.1 million. In assessing the realization of EME Homer City's deferred tax assets, management considered whether it is more likely than not
the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of EME Homer City's deferred income tax assets depends upon its ability to generate taxable income in the future or utilize losses
through a reduction in the loan with Edison Mission Finance. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the recoverability of its deferred tax assets to ensure there is adequate support for the
realization of the deferred tax assets. In the event management were to determine that EME Homer City would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an
adjustment to

67

---



the
deferred tax assets would be charged as a reduction to income in the period such determination was made. Because EME Homer City is expected to realize deferred tax assets through future taxable
income or by reduction of intercompany loans, no valuation allowance has been recorded.

Interest
expense and penalties associated with income taxes are reflected in the caption "Provision (benefit) for income taxes" on the statements of income (loss). For further
discussion, see Note 6Income Taxes.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of emission allowances purchased by EME Homer City. These emission allowances are stated at weighted average cost. Emission
allowances do not have a pre-determined contractual term or expiration date.

Inventory

Inventory consists of spare parts, coal, fuel oil and limestone and is stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Principles Adopted

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard Interpretation No. 48

In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN No. 48 requires an enterprise to recognize, in its financial
statements, the best estimate of the impact of a tax position by determining if the weight of the available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that
the position will be sustained on audit. EME Homer City adopted FIN No. 48 effective January 1, 2007. Adoption of FIN No. 48 did not result in a cumulative-effect
adjustment to partners' equity.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155

In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, which amends SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for at fair value at acquisition, at issuance, or when a previously
recognized financial instrument is subject to a remeasurement event, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, in cases in which a derivative would otherwise have to be bifurcated.
SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to remeasurement after January 1, 2007. The fair value election provided for in paragraph 4(c)
of this Statement may also be applied upon adoption of this Statement for hybrid financial instruments that had been bifurcated under paragraph 12 of SFAS No. 133 prior to the adoption
of this Statement. The adoption of this standard had no effect on EME Homer City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007.

68

---



Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted

FASB Staff Position FIN No. 39-1

In
April 2007, the FASB issued FIN No. 39-1. FIN No. 39-1 amends paragraph 3 of FIN No. 39 to replace the terms conditional contracts
and exchange contracts with the term derivative instruments as defined in SFAS No. 133. FIN No. 39-1 also states that under master netting arrangements if collateral is based
on fair value, then it must be netted with the fair value of derivative assets/liabilities if an entity qualified and elected the option to net those amounts. EME Homer City will adopt FIN
No. 39-1 in the first quarter of 2008. EME Homer City does not currently have margining agreements and accordingly, adoption of FIN No. 39-1 will not have
an impact on its financial statements.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159

In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, which provides an option to report eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized
in earnings. EME Homer City will adopt this pronouncement in the first quarter of 2008. Since EME Homer City elected not to report any current financial assets and liabilities at fair
value, the adoption will not result in any cumulative-effect adjustment to partners' equity.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157

In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, which clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosures on fair
value measurements. EME Homer City will adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of 2008. The adoption is not expected to result in any retrospective adjustment to its financial
statements. The accounting requirements for employers' pension and other postretirement benefit plans is effective at the end of 2008, which is the next measurement date for these benefit plans. The
effective date will be January 1, 2009 for AROs and other nonfinancial liabilities which are not measured or disclosed on a recurring basis (at least annually).

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed on a straight-line basis over the following estimated
useful lives:

|                                          |  |                                                  
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Plant and equipment under lease financing |  | 33.67 years                                      
|Leasehold improvements                    |  | Shorter of life of lease or
estimated useful life
|Emission allowances                       |  | 33.67 years                                      
|Equipment, furniture and fixtures         |  | 3 to 7 years                                     
|Capitalized leased equipment              |  | 5 years                                          

As part of the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City acquired emission allowances under the US EPA's Acid Rain Program.
Although the emission allowances granted under this program are freely transferable, EME Homer City intends to use substantially all the emission allowances in the normal course of its business
to generate electricity. Accordingly, EME Homer City has classified emission allowances expected to be used to generate power as part of property, plant and equipment.

69

---



Repairs and Maintenance

Certain major pieces of equipment require repairs and maintenance on a periodic basis. These costs, including major maintenance costs, are expensed as incurred.

Restricted Cash

Certain cash balances are restricted to pay amounts required for lease payments and provide collateral. Included in restricted cash were $30.0 million and
$40.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to lease payments, and $7.1 million at each of December 31, 2007 and 2006 for collateral related to an
environmental bond. See Note 8Commitments and ContingenciesLease CommitmentsFacilities Sale Leaseback, for additional information regarding the lease
payments.

Revenue Recognition

EME Homer City records revenue and related costs as electricity is generated or services are provided unless EME Homer City is subject to SFAS
No. 133 and does not qualify for the normal sales and purchases exception. EME Homer City enters into power and fuel hedging and optimization transactions under a contract with EMMT.
These transactions are executed primarily through the use of physical forward commodity purchases and sales and financial commodity swaps and options. With respect to its physical forward contracts,
EME Homer City takes title to the commodities, and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. Therefore, EME Homer City records settlement of non-trading physical forward
contracts on a gross basis. Consistent with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 03-11, "Reporting Realized Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments that are Subject to FASB Statement
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and Not Held for Trading Purposes," EME Homer City nets the cost of purchased power against related third-party
sales in markets that use locational marginal pricing, currently PJM. Financial swap and option transactions are settled net and, accordingly, EME Homer City does not take title to the
underlying commodity. Therefore, gains and losses from settlement of financial swaps and options are recorded net in operating revenues in the accompanying income statements. Managed risks typically
include commodity price risk associated with fuel purchases and power sales.

Note 2. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges

Unrecognized Losses
and Prior Service Costs, Net(2)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(in thousands)Balance at December 31, 2005

$
(107,052
)
$


$
(107,052
)Change for 2006


164,959





164,959SFAS No. 158 adjustments(1)





(1,502
)

(1,502
)Balance at December 31, 2006


57,907


(1,502
)

56,405Change for 2007


(72,358
)

1,777


(70,581
)Balance at December 31, 2007

$
(14,451
)
$
275

$
(14,176
)


---

70

---



Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, at December 31, 2007, include unrealized losses on commodity hedges related to futures
and forward energy sales contracts that qualify for hedge accounting. These losses arise because current forecasts of future electricity prices are greater than EME Homer City's contract
prices. As EME Homer City's hedged positions are realized, approximately $1.8 million, after tax, of the net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges at December 31, 2007 are
expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. Management expects that reclassification of net unrealized losses will decrease energy revenue recognized at market prices.
Actual amounts ultimately reclassified into earnings over the next 12 months could vary materially from this estimated amount as a result of changes in market conditions. The maximum period
over which a cash flow hedge is designated is through December 31, 2010.

Under
SFAS No. 133, the portion of a cash flow hedge that does not offset the change in value of the transaction being hedged, which is commonly referred to as the ineffective
portion, is immediately recognized in earnings. EME Homer City recorded net losses of $27.9 million, $4.0 million and $62.6 million during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing the amount of cash flow hedges' ineffectiveness, reflected in operating revenues in the income statements.

Note 3. Property, Plant and Equipment

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

2007

2006(in thousands)Land

$
7,340

$
7,284Power plant facilities


2,637


2,637Plant and equipment under lease financing


1,591,036


1,591,036Leasehold improvements


105,081


91,345Emission allowances


433,777


433,777Construction in progress


4,772


6,533Equipment, furniture and fixtures


9,530


9,285Capitalized leased equipment


916


9162,155,089


2,142,813Less accumulated depreciation and amortization


411,438


348,853Property, plant and equipment, net

$
1,743,651

$
1,793,960


As a result of the sale-leaseback transaction on December 7, 2001, a majority of the generating facilities and equipment were
classified as power plant and equipment under lease financing. EME Homer City recorded amortization expense related to the leased facilities of $47.3 million for all three years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Accumulated amortization related to the leased facilities was $286.6 million and $239.4 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Effective January 1, 2003, EME Homer City adopted SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 requires
entities to record the fair value of a liability for an ARO in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying
amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is increased to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of

71

---



the
related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement.

In
March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations," an interpretation of SFAS No. 143. This interpretation clarifies that an
entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional ARO if the fair value can be reasonably estimated even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of
settlement. This interpretation became effective as of December 31, 2005 for EME Homer City. The adoption of this interpretation had no impact on EME Homer City's financial
statements.

EME Homer
City recorded a liability representing expected future costs associated with site reclamation, facilities dismantlement and removal of environmental hazards as follows:

2007

2006

2005(in thousands)Beginning balance

$
5,654

$
5,140

$
4,672Accretion expense


565


514


468Ending balance

$
6,219

$
5,654

$
5,140


Note 4. Long-Term Debt

EME Homer City entered into a subordinated revolving loan agreement during 1999 with Edison Mission Finance Co. This loan agreement bears interest
at a fixed rate of 8.0% on outstanding amounts and terminates on March 18, 2014. On December 8, 2003, EME Homer City amended and restated the loan agreement with Edison Mission
Finance and issued a note evidencing its repayment obligations under the loan agreement. The amended and restated loan agreement had no effect on the financial terms of the agreement. EME Homer
City owed approximately $395 million and $512 million under the loan agreement at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. EME Homer City is restricted under the
participation agreements entered into as a part of the sale-leaseback transaction from making any payments under this facility unless specified conditions are met.

EME Homer
City incurred interest costs related to its affiliate debt of $37.6 million, $39.9 million and $37.1 million for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Note 5. Risk Management and Derivative Financial Instruments

Commodity Price Risk Management

EME Homer City's risk management policy allows for the use of derivative financial instruments through EMMT to limit financial exposure from fluctuations
in electricity, capacity, fuel prices, emission allowances and transmission rights for non-trading purposes. Use of these instruments exposes EME Homer City to commodity price
risks, which represent the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the market value of a particular commodity. Commodity price risks are actively monitored by a risk management committee to
ensure compliance with EME Homer City's risk management policies through EMMT. Policies are in place which define risk management processes, and procedures exist which allow for monitoring of
all commitments and positions with regular reviews by a risk management committee. EMMT uses "earnings at risk" to identify, measure, monitor and control its overall market risk exposure with respect
to hedge positions at the Homer City facilities. The use of this measure allows management to aggregate overall commodity risk, compare risk on a consistent basis and identify risk factors. Earnings
at risk measures the potential change in value of an asset or position, in each case

72

---



over
a given time interval, under normal market conditions, at a given confidence level. Given the inherent limitations of this measure and reliance on a single risk measurement tool, EMMT supplements
this approach with the use of stress testing and worst-case scenario analysis for key risk factors, as well as stop-loss limits and counterparty credit exposure limits.

The
following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values for outstanding financial instruments used for hedging activities. The change in fair value of electricity contracts
in 2007 as compared to 2006 is attributable to an increase in average market prices for power as compared to contracted prices at December 31, 2007, which is the valuation date, causing the
fair value of the contracts to become liabilities instead of assets.

December 31, 2007

December 31, 2006Carrying Amount

Fair Value

Carrying Amount

Fair Value(in thousands)Commodity price:Electricity

$
(45,676
)
$
(45,676
)
$
89,099

$
89,099


In assessing the fair value of EME Homer City's electricity contracts, EME Homer City uses a variety of methods and assumptions that are
based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. The fair value of the electricity contracts takes into account quoted market prices, time value of money, volatility of the
underlying commodities and other factors.

EME
Homer City classifies unrealized gains and losses from energy contracts as part of operating revenues. The following table summarizes unrealized gains (losses) for the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in millions)Non-qualifying hedges

$
(1.0
)
$
1.6

$
(1.3
)Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges


(8.8
)

32.7


(40.3
)Total unrealized gains (losses)

$
(9.8
)
$
34.3

$
(41.6
)


Credit Risk

In conducting EME Homer City's hedging activities, EMMT contracts with a number of utilities, energy companies, financial institutions, and other
companies, collectively referred to as counterparties. In the event a counterparty were to default on its trade obligation, EME Homer City would be exposed to the risk of possible loss
associated with re-contracting the product at a price different from the original contracted price if the non-performing counterparty were unable to pay the resulting
liquidated damages owed to EME Homer City. Further, EME Homer City would be exposed to the risk of non-payment of accounts receivable accrued for products delivered prior to the
time a counterparty defaulted.

To
manage credit risk, EMMT looks at the risk of a potential default by counterparties. Credit risk is measured by the loss that would be incurred if counterparties failed to perform
pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. EMMT measures, monitors and mitigates credit risk to the extent possible. To mitigate credit risk from counterparties, master netting agreements
are used whenever possible and counterparties may be required to pledge collateral when deemed necessary. EMMT also takes other

73

---



appropriate
steps to limit or lower credit exposure. Processes have also been established to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties. EMMT manages the credit risk on the portfolio
based on credit ratings using published ratings of counterparties and other publicly disclosed information, such as financial statements, regulatory filings, and press releases, to guide it in the
process of setting credit levels, risk limits and contractual arrangements, including master netting agreements. A risk management committee regularly reviews the credit quality of EMMT's
counterparties.

In
addition, coal for the Homer City facilities is purchased from suppliers under contracts which may be for multiple years. A number of the coal suppliers to the Homer City facilities
do not currently have an investment grade credit rating and, accordingly, EME Homer City may have limited recourse to collect damages in the event of default by a supplier. EME Homer
City seeks to mitigate this risk through diversification of its coal suppliers and through guarantees and other collateral arrangements when available.

EME Homer
City derives a significant source of its operating revenues from electric power sold into the PJM market by EMMT. Sales into PJM accounted for approximately 70%, 58% and
85% of EME Homer City's operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Moody's rates PJM's senior unsecured debt Aa3. PJM, an ISO with over 300
member companies, maintains its own credit risk policies and does not extend unsecured credit to non-investment grade companies. Any losses due to a PJM member default are shared by all
other members based upon a predetermined formula.

For
the year ended December 31, 2007, EMMT also made sales to American Electric Power Service Corporation that accounted for approximately 11% of EME Homer City's operating
revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2006, EMMT made sales to Coral Power, LLC that accounted for approximately 21% of EME Homer City's operating revenues. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, EMMT made sales to Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Constellation Power Source, Inc. that accounted for approximately 22% and 11% of EME Homer
City's operating revenues, respectively.

Note 6. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) includes the current tax liability (benefit) from operations and the change in deferred income taxes during the year. The components
of the net accumulated deferred income tax asset were:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006(in thousands)Deferred tax assetsLease financing

$
108,646

$
96,099Derivative assets


18,866


Accrued expenses


3,292


4,079State taxes


5,426


2,991Net operating losses





283Other


1,131


1,020Total


137,361


104,472Deferred tax liabilitiesProperty, plant and equipmentbasis differences

$
35,231

$
35,557Derivative liabilities





36,196Total


35,231


71,753Deferred tax asset, net

$
102,130

$
32,719Classification of accumulated deferred income taxes:Included in current assets

$
5,748

$
Included in non-current assets

$
96,382

$
65,781Included in current liabilities

$


$
33,062


EME Homer City had no Pennsylvania net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2007.

74

---



The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the following:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in thousands)CurrentFederal

$
56,174

$
21,698

$
20,643State


19,502


5,586


7,532Total current


75,676


27,284


28,175DeferredFederal


(18,260
)

(2,107
)

(26,371
)State


(2,975
)

404


(5,819
)Total deferred


(21,235
)

(1,703
)

(32,190
)Provision (benefit) for income taxes

$
54,441

$
25,581

$
(4,015
)


Variations from the 35% federal statutory rate are as follows:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in thousands)Provision (benefit) for federal income taxes at statutory rate

$
49,900

$
22,684

$
(5,292
)Increase (decrease) in taxes from:State tax, net of federal benefit


10,714


3,795


1,276Qualified production deduction


(2,755
)

(507
)

Changes in uncertain tax positions


(3,160
)




Other


(258
)

(391
)

1Total provision (benefit) for income taxes

$
54,441

$
25,581

$
(4,015
)Effective tax (benefit) rate


38.2
%

39.5
%

(26.6
)%


Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The following table provides a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:

(in thousands)Balance, January 1, 2007

$
3,945Tax positions taken during a prior yearIncreases


Decreases


2,470Decreases for settlements during the period


1,475Balance, December 31, 2007

$



The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 and the date of adoption that, if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate was none and $3.9 million, respectively.

The
total amount of accrued interest and penalties was $0.4 million and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and the date of adoption, respectively. The total amount
of interest income and

75

---



penalties
recognized in income tax expense was $1.1 million for 2007. EME Homer City remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, the California Franchise Tax Board, and
other state authorities from 1994 to present.

On
March 31, 2006, EME Homer City entered into an amendment of its tax-allocation agreement with Edison Mission Holdings to provide for the option, at EME Homer City's
discretion, to settle federal and state income tax liabilities under the tax-allocation agreement through an increase in indebtedness under the subordinated revolving loan agreement with
Edison Mission Finance. Pursuant to this amendment, EME Homer City elected this option to settle $60.2 million of intercompany tax liabilities through a loan under the subordinated revolving
loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance.

Note 7. Compensation and Benefit Plans

Employees of EME Homer City are eligible for various benefit plans of Edison International.

Employee Savings Plan

A 401(k) plan is maintained to supplement eligible employees' retirement income. EME Homer City matches 100% of non-union employee contributions up to
6% of such employees' base annual compensation. EME Homer City also matches 70% of contributions made by union employees, up to 4% of base annual compensation. Employer contributions vest 20% per
year. Contribution expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $650,000, $593,000 and $566,000, respectively.

Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

SFAS No. 158 requires companies to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement plans as
assets or liabilities in their balance sheet; the assets or liabilities are offset through other comprehensive income. EME Homer City adopted SFAS No. 158
prospectively on December 31, 2006. SFAS No. 158 also requires companies to align the measurement dates for their plans to their fiscal year-ends; EME Homer City already has
a fiscal year-end measurement date for all of its postretirement plans. Upon adoption, EME Homer City recorded additional postretirement benefit liabilities of $2.6 million
(included in benefit plans and other) and a reduction to accumulated other comprehensive income (a component of partners' equity) of $1.5 million, net of tax.

Pension Plans

EME Homer City maintains a pension plan specifically for the benefit of its union employees. A portion of EME Homer City's non-union employees
participate in the Edison International pension plan. Eligibility depends on a number of factors, including the employee's hire date. Both plans are noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans and
cover employees who fulfill minimum service requirements. The Edison International plan has a cash balance feature.

The
expected contributions (all by employer) for the plans are approximately $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The amount is subject to change depending on
the funded status at year-end and the tax deductible funding limitations.

The
fair value of plan assets is determined primarily by quoted market prices.

76

---



Information
on plan assets and benefits obligations is shown below:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006(in thousands)Change in projected benefit obligationProjected benefit obligation at beginning of year

$
24,479

$
23,484Service cost


1,533


1,618Interest cost


1,393


1,247Change in plan provision


(4
)

Actuarial gain


(1,496
)

(1,736
)Benefits paid


(429
)

(134
)Projected benefit obligation at end of year

$
25,476

$
24,479Change in plan assetsFair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$
16,205

$
13,363Actual return on plan assets


1,424


2,207Employer contributions


2,114


769Benefits paid


(429
)

(134
)Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$
19,314

$
16,205Funded status at end of year

$
(6,162
)
$
(8,274
)Amounts recognized in balance sheets:Long-term liabilities

$
6,162

$
8,274Amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss):Prior service credit

$
(4
)
$
Net gain


(2,448
)

(248
)Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year

$
20,975

$
17,439Pension plan with an accumulated benefit obligation
in excess of plan assets:Projected benefit obligation

$
25,476

$
3,400Accumulated benefit obligation


20,975


3,299Fair value of plan assets


19,314


1,491Weighted-average assumptions used to determine
obligations at end of year:Discount rate


6.25
%

5.75
%Rate of compensation increase


4.5% to 5.0
%

5.0
%


77

---



Expense components and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

Expense components:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in thousands)Service cost

$
1,533

$
1,618

$
1,799Interest cost


1,394


1,247


1,143Expected return on plan assets


(1,255
)

(1,095
)

(888
)Net amortization


(64
)

4


121Total expense

$
1,608

$
1,774

$
2,175


Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss:

Year Ended
December 31,
2007(in thousands)Net gain

$
(2,065
)Prior service credit


(4
)Amortization of net gain


64Total in other comprehensive loss

$
(2,005
)Total in expense and other comprehensive loss

$
(397
)


The estimated amortization amounts reclassified from other comprehensive loss for 2008 are $(76,000) for net gain and $(1,000) for prior service
credit.

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005Weighted-average assumptions:Discount rate

5.75
%
5.5
%
5.5
%Rate of compensation increase

4.5% to 5.0
%
5.0
%
5.0
%Expected long-term return on plan assets

7.5
%
7.5
%
7.5
%


The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid:

Years Ending December 31,

(in thousands)2008

$
1,1532009


1,3782010


1,5652011


1,7192012


1,8462013-2017


10,258


78

---



Asset allocations are:

December 31,Target for
20082007

2006United States equity

45%

47%

47%Non-United States equity

25%

25%

26%Private equity

4%

2%

2%Fixed income

26%

26%

25%


Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

A portion of EME Homer City's non-union employees retiring at or after age 55 with at least ten years of service are eligible for postretirement
health care, dental, life insurance and other benefits paid in part by EME Homer City. Eligibility depends on a number of factors, including the employee's hire date. Employees in union-represented
positions who were eligible to retire prior to May 14, 2002 are covered under the postretirement benefit plans of GPU, Inc., their employer prior to EME Homer City's acquisition
of the facilities in 1999. In May 2003, EME Homer City reached agreement with the union on a new collective bargaining agreement covering wages, benefits and working conditions. This agreement will
expire on December 31, 2012. Accordingly, EME Homer City will amortize the impact over the estimated remaining service of covered employees.

The
expected contributions (all by the employer) for the postretirement benefits other than pensions trust are $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This
amount is subject to change depending on the funded status at year-end and the tax deductible funding limitations.

79

---



Information
on plan assets and benefit obligations is shown below:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006(in thousands)Change in benefit obligationBenefit obligation at beginning of year

$
23,148

$
20,870Service cost


882


849Interest cost


1,407


1,221Actuarial (gain) loss


(585
)

378Plan participant contributions


52


22Benefits paid


(287
)

(192
)Benefit obligation at end of year

$
24,617

$
23,148Change in plan assetsFair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$


$
Employer contributions


235


170Plan participant contributions


52


22Benefits paid


(287
)

(192
)Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$


$
Funded status at end of year

$
(24,617
)
$
(23,148
)Amounts recognized in balance sheets:Long-term liabilities

$
24,617

$
23,148Amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss):Prior service credit

$
(296
)
$
(400
)Net loss


2,272


3,246Weighted-average assumptions used to determine
obligations at end of year:Discount rate


6.25
%

5.75
%Assumed health care cost trend rates:Rate assumed for following year


9.25
%

9.25
%Ultimate rate


5.0
%

5.0
%Year ultimate rate reached


2015


2011


80

---



Expense components and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)

Expense components:

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in thousands)Service cost

$
882

$
849

$
742Interest cost


1,407


1,221


1,142Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs


(104
)

(104
)

(104
)Amortization of unrecognized net loss


303


291


307Total expense

$
2,488

$
2,257

$
2,087


Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss:

Year Ended December 31, 2007(in thousands)Net gain

$
(974
)Prior service cost


104Amortization of prior service cost


104Amortization of net loss


(303
)Total in other comprehensive loss

$
(1,069
)Total in expense and other comprehensive loss

$
1,419


The estimated amortization amounts reclassified from other comprehensive loss for 2008 are $206,000 for net loss and $(104,000) for prior service
credit.

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005Weighted-average assumptions used to
determine expense:Discount rate

5.75%

5.5%

5.75%Assumed health care cost trend rates:Current year

9.25%

10.25%

10.0%Ultimate rate

5.0%

5.0%

5.0%Year ultimate rate reached

2015

2011

2010


Increasing the health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase the accumulated benefit obligation as of December 31,
2007, by $4.1 million and annual aggregate service and interest costs by $0.4 million. Decreasing the health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would decrease the accumulated
benefit obligation as of December 31, 2007, by $3.5 million and annual aggregate service and interest costs by $0.3 million.

81

---



The
following benefit payments are expected to be paid:

Year ended December 31,

Before Subsidy

Net(in thousands)2008

$
391

$
3912009


572


5722010


777


7752011


1,016


1,0142012


1,255


1,2492013-2017


8,897


8,655


Discount Rate

The discount rate enables EME Homer City to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. EME Homer City selects its discount rate
by performing a yield curve analysis. This analysis determines the equivalent discount rate on projected cash flows, matching the timing and amount of expected benefit payments. Three yield curves
were considered: two corporate yield curves (Citigroup and AON) and a curve based on treasury rates (plus 90 basis points). EME Homer City also compared the yield curve analysis against the Moody's AA
Corporate bond rate.

Description of Pension and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions Investment Strategies

The investment of plan assets is overseen by a fiduciary investment committee. Plan assets are invested using a combination of asset classes, and may have active
and passive investment strategies within asset classes. EME Homer City employs multiple investment management firms. Investment managers within each asset class cover a range of investment styles and
approaches. Risk is controlled through diversification among multiple asset classes, managers, styles, and securities. Plan, asset class and individual manager performance is measured against targets.
EME Homer City also monitors the stability of its investments managers' organizations.

Allowable
investment types include:

Permitted
ranges around asset class portfolio weights are plus or minus 5%. Where approved by the fiduciary investment committee, futures contracts are used for portfolio rebalancing and
to approach fully invested portfolio positions. Where authorized, a few of the plan's investment managers employ limited use of derivatives, including futures contracts, options, options on futures
and interest rate swaps in place of direct investment in securities to gain efficient exposure to markets. Derivatives are not used to leverage the plans or any portfolios.

82

---



Determination of the Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets

The overall expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption is based on the target asset allocation for plan assets and capital markets return
forecasts for asset classes employed. A portion of postretirement benefits other than pensions trust asset returns are subject to taxation, so the expected long-term rate of return for
these assets is determined on an after-tax basis.

Capital Markets Return Forecasts

The estimated total return for fixed income is based on an equilibrium yield for intermediate United States government bonds plus a premium for exposure to
non-government bonds in the broad fixed income market. The equilibrium yield is based on analysis of historic data and is consistent with experience over various economic environments. The
premium of the broad market over United States government bonds is a historic average premium. The estimated rate of return for equity is estimated to be a 3% premium over the estimated total return
of intermediate United States government bonds. This value is determined by combining estimates of real earnings growth, dividend yields and inflation, each of which is determined using historical
analysis. The rate of return for private equity is estimated to be a 5% premium over public equity, reflecting a premium for higher volatility and illiquidity.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

EME Homer City had operating leases in place relating mainly to tractors and trucks. EME Homer City also has a lease financing with respect to its facilities,
which is described in more detail below. At December 31, 2007, the future minimum payments over the next five years were as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

Operating Leases

Lease Financing(in thousands)2008

$
564

$
152,1732009


417


150,7762010


320


154,9932011


125


160,3782012


20


159,886Thereafter





1,654,272Total future commitments

$
1,446


2,432,478Amount representing interest





(1,172,545
)Net commitments




$
1,259,933


Operating lease expense amounted to $1.6 million, $1.0 million and $1.1 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Facilities Sale-Leaseback

On December 7, 2001, EME Homer City completed the sale-leaseback of its Homer City facilities to third-party lessors for an aggregate purchase
price of $1.591 billion, comprised of $782 million in cash and assumption of debt (the fair value of which was $809.3 million). The leases EME Homer City entered into as part of
this transaction are referred to as facility leases. The transaction has been

83

---



accounted
for as a lease financing for accounting purposes, which means that EME Homer City reflects the Homer City facilities as an asset on its balance sheet, although EME Homer City has no legal
ownership, and records the net present value of the future minimum lease payments as lease debt. Under the terms of the 33.67 year leases, EME Homer City is obligated to make
semi-annual lease payments on each April 1 and October 1. The gain on the sale of the Homer City facilities has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the
lease.

The
rent payments that EME Homer City owes under the sale-leaseback transaction are comprised of two components, a senior rent portion and an equity rent portion. The senior
rent is used exclusively for debt service to the holders of the senior secured bonds, while the equity rent is paid to the owner lessors. If EME Homer City does not meet specified debt service
coverage ratios while the lease debt is outstanding, it will not pay the equity portion of the rent to the owner lessors. Accordingly, the sale-leaseback documentation does not permit the
lessor to terminate the lease in the event of non-payment of the equity portion of the rent while the lease debt is outstanding.

In
order to pay the equity portion of the rent, EME Homer City is required to meet historical and projected senior rent service coverage ratios of 1.7 to 1, subject to reduction to 1.3
to 1 under circumstances specified in the participation agreements. During the 12 months ended December 31, 2007, the senior rent service coverage ratio was 4.16 to 1. The senior rent
service coverage ratio is determined by dividing net cash flow as defined in the participation agreements by the senior rent due in that period. If all accrued rent, including both the senior portion
and the equity portion of the rent, has been paid and all other required conditions have been met, amounts remaining in the distribution account will be available for distribution to the partners in
EME Homer City or available to prepay principal under the intercompany loan agreement with Edison Mission Finance, subject to certain restrictions in the sale-leaseback documentation,
including restrictions on distributions.

EME
Homer City's use of cash in its bank accounts is limited to specific operating and capital expenditures as set forth in the Security Deposit Agreement executed as part of the
sale-leaseback transaction. The amount in certain reserve accounts will be available for payments due on the equity portion of lease rent during specified periods, and in accordance with
the sale-leaseback documents, unless there is a default in the payment of the senior portion of lease rent, in which case the amount will be available to pay such senior portion of the
lease rent. The release of funds from these restricted cash accounts is permitted, provided EME Homer City maintains specified reserve balances in accordance with the sale-leaseback
documents, no event of default shall have occurred or be continuing and no two failed rent payments shall have occurred. EME Homer City had $30.0 million and $40.0 million included in
restricted cash at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to these reserve accounts.

Termination of Lease Swap Agreement

In connection with the sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City had entered into a swap agreement with a bank in order to more effectively match its
cash flow, which generally is higher during the summer months when energy prices are higher, with its lease payments. At December 31, 2006, EME Homer City had a net deposit balance due from the
bank of $45.4 million. On March 30, 2007, EME Homer City terminated the lease swap agreement and received a refund of the net deposit and the accrued interest totaling
$45.9 million.

84

---



Other Commitments

Capital Improvements

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had firm commitments to spend approximately $10.8 million on capital expenditures in 2008 related to
non-environmental improvements such as upgrades to boiler and turbine controls, replacement of major boiler components and environmental improvements such as mercury emission monitoring
and control. These capital expenditures are planned to be financed by cash generated from operations.

Fuel Supply Contracts

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had fuel purchase commitments with various third-party suppliers for the purchase of bituminous steam coal and fuel
oil. The contracts require EME Homer City to purchase a minimum quantity over the term of the contracts, with an option at EME Homer City's discretion to purchase additional amounts as stated in the
agreements. Based on the contract provisions that consist of fixed prices, subject to adjustment clauses in certain cases, these minimum commitments are currently estimated to be $451.6 million
in the next three years summarized as follows: 2008$245.8 million; 2009$193.7 million; and 2010$12.1 million.

Coal Transportation Agreements

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had contractual commitments for the transport of coal by rail to its facilities, with one year remaining on the
contract. The minimum commitments are based on the contract provisions, which consist of fixed prices, subject to adjustment clauses. The minimum commitment is currently estimated to be
$10.6 million in 2008.

Coal Cleaning Agreement

Effective January 1, 2006, EME Homer City entered into a coal cleaning agreement with Homer City Coal Processing Corporation to operate and maintain a coal
cleaning plant owned by EME Homer City. The agreement expires on December 31, 2010. Based on the contract provisions, the minimum commitments are currently estimated to be $16.7 million
in the next three years summarized as follows: 2008$5.4 million; 2009$5.6 million; and 2010$5.7 million.

Other Contractual Obligations

At December 31, 2007, EME Homer City had contractual agreements for the purchase of limestone, which is used for the wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization
system on Unit 3, and ammonia. The minimum commitments are currently estimated to be $26.0 million in the next four years summarized as follows: 2008$5.2 million;
2009$6.7 million; 2010$7.0 million; and 2011$7.1 million.

Interconnection Agreement

EME Homer City's general partner, Mission Energy Westside, is a party to an interconnection agreement with NYSEG and Penelec to provide interconnection services
necessary to interconnect the Homer City facilities with NYSEG's and Penelec's transmission systems. Unless terminated earlier in accordance with specified terms, the interconnection agreement will
terminate on a date mutually agreed to by Mission Energy Westside, NYSEG and Penelec. This date will not exceed the retirement date of the Homer City units. NYSEG and Penelec have agreed to extend the
interconnection services (but not the expiration of the agreement) to modifications, additions or upgrades to, or repowering of the Homer

85

---



City
units. Mission Energy Westside is required to compensate NYSEG and Penelec for all reasonable costs associated with any modifications, additions or replacements made to NYSEG's or Penelec's
interconnection facilities or transmission systems in connection with any modification, addition or upgrade to, or repowering of the Homer City units.

Guarantees and Indemnities

Tax Indemnity Agreements

In connection with the sale-leaseback transaction related to the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City and its indirect parent, EME, entered into tax
indemnity agreements. Under these tax indemnity agreements, EME Homer City and EME agreed to indemnify the equity investors in the sale-leaseback transaction for specified adverse tax
consequences that could result in certain situations set forth in the tax indemnity agreements, including specified defaults under the respective leases. The potential indemnity obligation under these
tax indemnity agreements could be significant. Due to the nature of the obligations under these tax indemnity agreements, EME Homer City cannot determine a maximum potential liability. The indemnities
would be triggered by a valid claim from the lessors. EME Homer City has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.

Indemnity Provided as Part of the Acquisition of the Homer City Facilities

In connection with the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City agreed to indemnify the sellers with respect to specific environmental liabilities
before and after the date of sale. Payments would be triggered under this indemnity by a claim from the sellers. EME guaranteed the obligations of EME Homer City. Due to the nature of the obligation
under this indemnity provision, it is not subject to a maximum potential liability and does not have an expiration date. EME Homer City has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.

Contingencies

Ash Disposal Site

EME Homer City's ash disposal site is a permitted Class I Residual Waste Landfill, the most stringently regulated of the three categories of residual waste
landfills authorized by the regulations of the PADEP. EME Homer City's permit allows it to dispose of coal combustion by-products, including fly ash, bottom ash and pyrites, and
miscellaneous plant wastes at the landfill. The wastes are deposited in compacted layers within lifts, or sections. Each lift where coal ash is disposed must be capped and covered when it reaches
final grade. EME Homer City must also monitor groundwater quality at and adjacent to the ash disposal site through a network of monitoring wells and report the results to the PADEP on a periodic
basis. In the event that a disposal facility's groundwater monitoring identifies degradation in any of its wells, the PADEP's regulations require the facility to first confirm the existence and nature
of the degradation by conducting a groundwater assessment. If the assessment confirms groundwater degradation in excess of the applicable regulatory standards, the facility is then required to prepare
and implement an abatement plan that could include measures such as installing a liner in a previously unlined area. To date, no degradation has been found in the groundwater monitoring system at EME
Homer City that would require the development of an assessment or abatement plan. EME Homer City also provides financial assurance in the form of a surety bond to guarantee its closure and
post-closure obligations at the landfill. The estimated closure date is 2018. Based on the remaining capacity of the landfill and the estimated material requiring future disposal, EME
Homer City has begun permitting additional areas for expansion of the landfill. Management does not believe that the costs of

86

---



maintaining
and closing the ash disposal site will have a material impact on EME Homer City's financial statements.

Insurance

EME Homer City maintains insurance policies that are comparable to those carried by other electric generating facilities of a similar size. The insurance program
includes all-risk real and personal property insurance, including coverage for losses from boiler and machinery breakdowns, and the perils of earthquake and flood, subject to certain
sublimits. The property insurance program currently covers losses up to $1.25 billion. Under the terms of the participation agreements entered into as part of EME Homer City's
sale-leaseback transaction, EME Homer City is required to maintain specified minimum insurance coverages if and to the extent that such insurance is available on a commercially reasonable
basis. Although the insurance covering the Homer City facilities is comparable to insurance coverages normally carried by companies engaged in similar businesses, and owning similar properties, the
insurance coverages that are in place do not meet the minimum insurance coverages required under the participation agreements. Due to the current market environment, the minimum insurance coverage is
not commercially available at reasonable prices. EME Homer City has obtained a waiver under the participation agreements which permits it to maintain its current insurance coverage through
June 1, 2008.

EME
Homer City also carries general liability insurance covering liabilities to third parties for bodily injury or property damage resulting from operations, automobile liability
insurance and excess liability insurance. Limits and deductibles in respect of these insurance policies are consistent with the requirements of the participation agreements.

On
January 29, 2006, the main power transformer on Unit 3 of the Homer City facilities failed resulting in a suspension of operations at this unit. EME Homer City secured a
replacement transformer and Unit 3 returned to service on May 5, 2006. The main transformer failure resulted in claims under EME Homer City's property and business interruption insurance
policies. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, EME Homer City had a $1.0 million and $16.8 million receivable recorded related to these claims, respectively, of which
$2.8 million and $10.8 million, recorded during 2007 and 2006, respectively, relate to business interruption insurance coverage and have been reflected in interest and other income
(expense) on EME Homer City's income statement. EME Homer City received $18.3 million and $1.0 million in cash payments during 2007 and January 2008, respectively.

FERC Notice Regarding Investigatory Proceeding against EMMT

In October 2006, EMMT was advised by the enforcement staff at the FERC that it is prepared to recommend that the FERC initiate a formal investigatory proceeding
and seek monetary sanctions against EMMT for alleged violation of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the FERC's rules regarding market behavior, all with respect to certain bidding practices previously
employed by EMMT. EMMT is engaged in discussions with the staff to explore the possibility of resolution of this matter. Discussions to date have been constructive and may lead to a settlement
agreement acceptable to both parties. Should these discussions not result in a settlement and a formal proceeding commenced, EMMT will be entitled to contest any alleged violations before the FERC and
an appropriate court. EMMT has advised EME Homer City that EMMT believes that it has complied with all applicable laws and regulations in the bidding practices that it employed, and intends to contest
vigorously any allegation of violation.

87

---



Environmental Matters and Regulations

Introduction

The construction and operation of power plants are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities. EME Homer City believes that it is
in substantial compliance with existing environmental regulatory requirements. However, possible future developments, such as the promulgation of more stringent environmental laws and regulations,
future proceedings that may be initiated by environmental and other regulatory authorities, cases in which new theories of liability are recognized, and settlements agreed to by other companies that
establish precedent or expectations for the power industry, could affect the costs and the manner in which EME Homer City conducts its business and could require substantial additional capital or
operational expenditures or the ceasing of operations at certain of its facilities. There is no assurance that EME Homer City's financial position and results of operations would not be materially
adversely affected. EME Homer City is unable to predict the precise extent to which additional laws and regulations may affect its future operations and capital expenditure requirements.

Typically,
environmental laws and regulations require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits and approvals prior to construction, operation or modification of a
project or generating facility. Meeting all the necessary requirements can delay or sometimes prevent the completion of a
proposed project, as well as require extensive modifications to existing projects, which may involve significant capital or operational expenditures. If EME Homer City fails to comply with applicable
environmental laws, it may be subject to injunctive relief or penalties and fines imposed by federal and state regulatory authorities.

Air Quality Regulation

The federal CAA, state clean air acts, and federal and state regulations implementing such statutes have substantial impacts on power generation facilities,
particularly coal-fired plants. Federal environmental regulations require reductions in emissions beginning in 2009 and require states to adopt implementation plans that are equal to or
more stringent than the federal requirements. Compliance with these regulations and SIPs will affect the costs and the manner in which EME Homer City conducts its business, and will likely require EME
Homer City to make substantial additional capital expenditures. There is no assurance that EME Homer City would be able to recover these increased costs from its customers or that EME Homer City's
financial position and results of operations would not be materially adversely affected as a result.

Clean Air Interstate Rule

The CAIR, issued by the US EPA on March 10, 2005, applies to 28 eastern states and the District of Columbia and is intended to address ozone and fine
particulate matter attainment issues by reducing regional NOX and SO2 emissions. The CAIR reduces the current CAA Title IV Phase II SO2 emissions allowance
cap for 2010 and 2015 by 50% and 65%, respectively. The CAIR also requires reductions in regional NOX emissions in 2009 and 2015 by 53% and 61%, respectively, from 2003 levels. The CAIR
has been challenged in court by state, environmental and industry groups, which may result in changes to the substance of the rule and to the timetables for implementation.

EME
Homer City expects that compliance with the CAIR and the regulations and revised SIPs developed as a consequence of the CAIR will result in increased capital expenditures and
operating expenses. EME Homer City's approach to meeting these obligations will consist of a blending of capital

88

---



expenditure
and emission allowance purchases that will be based on an ongoing assessment of the dynamics of its market conditions.

On
December 18, 2007, the Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board approved the Pennsylvania CAIR. This rule has been submitted to the US EPA for approval as part of the
Pennsylvania SIP. The
Pennsylvania CAIR is substantively similar to the CAIR. EME Homer City will be subject to the federal CAIR rule during 2009 and expects to be able to comply with the NOX requirement using
its existing SCR system. The Pennsylvania CAIR, including both NOX and SO2 limits, is expected to become effective in 2010. EME Homer City expects to comply with Pennsylvania
CAIR through the continued operation of its scrubber on Unit 3 to reduce SO2 emissions and the purchase of SO2 allowances.

Mercury Regulation

By means of a rule published in May 2005, the US EPA established the CAMR, which created the framework for a national, market-based cap-and-trade program to
reduce mercury emissions from existing coal-fired power plants to a national cap of 38 tons by 2010 and to 15 tons by 2018, primarily through reductions in mercury achieved by lowering SO2
and NOX emissions under the CAIR. States were allowed, but not required, to join the trading program by adopting the CAMR model trading rules. States retained the right to promulgate
alternative regulations equivalent to or more stringent than the CAMR cap-and-trade program, as long as the regulations were approved by the US EPA.

At
the time that it published the CAMR, the US EPA also published a second rule, formally rescinding its previous finding that mercury emissions from electrical generating facilities had
to be regulated as a hazardous air pollutant pursuant to Section 112 of the CAA, which would have imposed technology-based standards on emission sources. Both the CAMR and US EPA's decision to
remove oil and coal-fired plants from the list of sources to be regulated under Section 112 of the CAA were challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit by various environmental
groups and state attorneys general.

On
February 8, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated both rules and remanded the matter to the US EPA. As a result, until the US EPA takes further action in
response to the remand, coal-fired electric generating facilities continue to be sources subject to regulation under Section 112 of the CAA and will be obligated to comply, on a
case-by-case basis, with technology-based standards to control emissions of hazardous air pollutants (not necessarily limited to mercury) in accordance with the requirements of
Section 112. As described below, the Homer City facilities are already subject to significant unit-specific mercury emission reduction requirements under Pennsylvania law. EME Homer
City is assessing the potential impact of this decision on the Pennsylvania regulations, including whether these regulations will turn out to be more or less stringent than
case-by-case maximum achievable control technology (also known as MACT) standards or MACT standards that may eventually be promulgated by the US EPA.

On
February 17, 2007, the PADEP published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin regulations that would require coal-fired power plants to reduce mercury emissions by 80% by
2010 and 90% by 2015. The rule does not allow the use of emissions trading to achieve compliance. The rule became final upon publication. The Pennsylvania CAMR SIP, which embodies PADEP's mercury
regulation, was pending approval by the US EPA prior to the February 8, 2008 Court of Appeals decision vacating the federal CAMR.

At
this time, EME Homer City expects its facilities to achieve compliance by the 2010 deadline with mercury removal achieved by an existing flue gas desulfurization system on one
generating unit and by

89

---



sorbent
injection and coal washing on the other two units. In order to meet reductions in emissions by the 2015 deadline, it is likely that additional environmental control equipment will need to be
installed. If additional environmental equipment is required in the form of flue gas desulfurization equipment, EME Homer City would need to make commitments during 2011 or 2012. EME Homer City
continues to study available environmental control technologies and estimated costs to reduce SO2 and mercury and to monitor developments related to mercury and other environmental
regulations.

Ambient Air Quality Standards

The US EPA designated non-attainment areas for its 8-hour ozone standard on April 30, 2004, and for its fine particulate matter
standard on January 5, 2005. Indiana County, the location of the Homer City facilities, is in a non-attainment area for both standards.

On
September 22, 2006 the US EPA issued a final rule that implements the revisions to its fine particulate standard originally proposed on January 17, 2006. Under the new
rule, the annual standard remains the same as originally proposed but the 24-hour fine particulate standard is significantly more stringent. The rule may require states to impose further
emission reductions beyond those necessary to meet the existing standards. EME Homer City anticipates that any such further emissions reduction obligations would not be imposed under this standard
until 2015 at the earliest, and intends to consider such rules as part of its overall plan for environmental compliance.

On
July 11, 2007 the US EPA issued a proposed rule to make revisions to the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards for ozone. With regard to the primary
standard for ozone, the US EPA proposes to reduce the level of the 8-hour standard to a level within the range of 0.070 to 0.075 parts per million (ppm). The US EPA solicited comment on
alternative levels down to 0.060 ppm and up to and including retaining the current 8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm (effectively 0.084 ppm using current data rounding conventions). The rule may
require states to impose further emission reductions beyond those necessary to meet the existing standards. EME Homer City anticipates that any such further emission reduction obligations would not be
imposed under this standard until 2015 at the earliest, and intends to consider such rules as part of its overall plan for environmental compliance.

In
June 2007, the PADEP requested a redesignation of Clearfield and Indiana counties to attainment with respect to the 8-hour ozone standard. The PADEP also submitted a
maintenance plan indicating that the existing (and upcoming) regulations controlling emissions of volatile organic compounds and NOx will result in continued compliance with the
8-hour ozone standard. Accordingly, EME Homer City believes that the Homer City facilities will likely not need to install additional pollution control as a result of the
8-hour ozone standard.

With
respect to fine particulates, Pennsylvania has not proposed new regulations to achieve compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for fine particulates. The SIP with
respect to this standard is due to the US EPA by April 5, 2008. Although the final form of the SIP is not yet known, at this time, EME Homer City does not anticipate that it will be required to
install additional pollution controls at the Homer City facilities to meet the expected SIP requirements for fine particulates.

Regional Haze

In July 1999, the US EPA published the "Regional Haze Rule" to reduce haze and protect visibility in designated federal areas. The goal of the 1999 rule is to
restore visibility in mandatory federal Class I areas, such as national parks and wilderness areas, to natural background conditions by 2064. Sources

90

---



such
as power plants that are reasonably anticipated to contribute to visibility impairment in Class I areas may be required to install best available retrofit technology (BART) or implement
other control strategies to meet regional haze control requirements. The US EPA issued a final rulemaking on regional haze on June 15, 2005. States were required to revise their SIPs by
December 2007 to demonstrate reasonable further progress towards meeting regional haze goals. Emission reductions achieved through other ongoing control programs may be sufficient to demonstrate
reasonable progress toward the long-term goal, particularly for the first 10 to 15 year phase of the program. It is possible that sources subject to the CAIR will be able to satisfy
their obligations under the regional haze regulations through compliance with the CAIR. However, until the SIPs are revised, EME Homer City cannot predict whether it will be required to install BART
or implement other control strategies, and cannot identify the financial impacts of any additional control requirements.

In
Pennsylvania, the PADEP considers the CAIR to meet the BART requirements, and the Homer City facilities are only required to consider reductions in emissions of suspended particulate
matter (PM10), which at this time are being evaluated by the state.

New Source Review Requirements

Since 1999, the US EPA has pursued a coordinated compliance and enforcement strategy to address CAA NSR compliance issues at the nation's coal-fired
power plants. The NSR regulations impose certain requirements on facilities, such as electric generating stations, if modifications are made to air emissions sources at a facility. The US EPA's
strategy has included both the filing of suits against a number of power plant owners, and the issuance of administrative notices of violation to a number of power plant owners alleging NSR
violations. EME Homer City has not been named as a defendant in these lawsuits and has not received any administrative Notices of Violation alleging NSR violations at its facilities.

Prior
to EME Homer City's purchase of the Homer City facilities, the US EPA requested information under Section 114 of the CAA from the prior owners of the plant concerning
physical changes at the plant. This request was part of the US EPA's industry-wide investigation of compliance by coal-fired plants with the CAA NSR requirements. Other than
this request for information, no NSR enforcement-related proceedings have been initiated by the US EPA with respect to any of EME Homer City's facilities.

Water Quality Regulation

Regulations under the federal Clean Water Act require permits for the discharge of pollutants into United States waters and permits for the discharge of storm
water flows from certain facilities. The Clean Water Act also regulates the thermal component (heat) of effluent discharges and the location, design, and construction of cooling water intake
structures at generating facilities.

Clean Water ActCooling Water Intake Structures

On July 9, 2004, the US EPA published the final Phase II rule implementing Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act establishing standards for
cooling water intake structures at existing large power plants. The purpose of the regulation was to reduce substantially the number of aquatic organisms that are pinned against cooling water intake
structures or drawn into cooling water systems. Pursuant to the regulation, a demonstration study was required when applying for a new or renewed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit. If one could demonstrate that the costs of meeting the presumptive standards set forth in the regulation were significantly greater than the costs that the US EPA
assumed in its rule making or are significantly disproportionate to the expected

91

---



environmental
benefits, a site-specific analysis could be performed to establish alternative standards. Depending on the findings of the demonstration studies, cooling towers and/or other
mechanical means of reducing impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms could have been required.

On
January 27, 2007, the Second Circuit rejected the US EPA rule and remanded it to the US EPA. Among the key provisions remanded by the court were the use of cost benefit and
restoration to achieve compliance with the rule. On July 9, 2007, the US EPA suspended the requirements for cooling water intake structures, pending further rulemaking. The US EPA is expected
to begin another rulemaking process by the end of 2008. Although the rule to be generated in the new rulemaking process could have a material impact on EME Homer City's operations, its compliance
criteria have not yet been finalized, and EME Homer City cannot reasonably determine the financial impact at this time.

The
discharge from the treatment plant receiving the wastewater stream from EME Homer City's Unit 3 flue gas desulfurization system has exceeded the stringent water-quality based limits
for selenium in the station's NPDES permit. As a result, EME Homer City was notified in April 2002 by the PADEP that it was included in the Quarterly Noncompliance Report submitted to the US EPA. With
the PADEP's approval, EME Homer City has undertaken a pilot program utilizing biological treatment. EME Homer City and the PADEP have entered into a consent order and agreement related to selenium
discharge, which was entered by the Pennsylvania state court on July 17, 2007. Under the consent order and agreement, EME Homer City paid a civil penalty of $200,000 and agreed to install
modifications to its wastewater system to achieve consistent compliance with discharge limits. EME Homer City has operated the wastewater treatment system for twelve months without a selenium
exceedance. At this time, EME Homer City expects to remain in compliance and consequently does not expect to install additional treatment systems.

Hazardous Substances and Hazardous Waste Laws

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of any facility, including an electric
generating facility, may be required to investigate and remediate releases or threatened releases of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products located at that facility, and may be held
liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, natural resource damages, and investigation and remediation costs incurred by these parties in connection with
these releases or threatened releases. Many of these laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, commonly referred to as CERCLA, as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of or caused the presence of the hazardous substances, and courts have interpreted
liability under these laws to be strict and joint and several.

Climate Change

Federal Legislative Initiatives

To date, the United States has pursued a voluntary GHG emissions reduction program to meet its obligations as a signatory to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. As a result of increased attention to climate change in the U.S., however, numerous bills have been introduced in the current session of the U.S. Congress that would
reduce GHG emissions in the U.S. Enactment of climate change legislation within the next several years may occur. However, there is still significant uncertainty about the cost of complying with any
future GHG emission requirements. These costs will depend upon many factors, including the required levels of GHG emission reductions, the timing of those reductions, whether emission credits will be
allocated with or without cost to existing generators, and whether

92

---



flexible
compliance mechanisms, such as a GHG offset program similar to those sanctioned under the CAA for conventional pollutants, will be part of the policy.

In
most of the federal proposals to date, emission allowances would be allocated and distributed without cost in the early years of the emission reduction program, followed by decreasing
free allocations and increasing auctions of allowances. While debate continues at the national level over domestic climate policy and the appropriate scope and terms of any federal legislation, many
states are developing state-specific measures or participating in regional legislative initiatives to reduce GHG emissions. At this
point, EME Homer City is unable to determine whether any of these proposals will be enacted into law or to estimate their potential effect on EME Homer City.

Regional Legislative Initiatives

On December 20, 2005, seven northeastern states entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to create a regional initiative to establish a
cap-and-trade GHG program for electric generators, referred to as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). In August 2006, the participating states issued a model rule to
be used as a basis for individual state legislative and regulatory action to implement the program. Pennsylvania is not a signatory to the RGGI, although it participated as an observer of the process.

Implementing
regulations for regional initiatives may be more stringent and costly than federal legislative proposals currently being debated in Congress. It cannot yet be determined
whether or to what extent any federal legislative system would preempt regional or state initiatives, although such preemption would greatly simplify compliance and eliminate regulatory duplication.
If state and/or regional initiatives are allowed to stand together with federal legislation, generators could be required to purchase allowances to satisfy their state and federal compliance
obligations.

Litigation Developments

The speed with which federal regulations and legislation will be adopted will depend in part on decisions rendered in climate change litigation pending before
several federal and state courts and the US EPA's response to those decisions. For example, on April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Massachusetts et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency,
et. al., ruling that the US EPA has the authority to regulate GHG emissions of new motor
vehicles under the CAA and that it has a duty to (i) determine whether GHG emissions of new motor vehicles contribute to climate change or (ii) offer a reasoned explanation for its
failure to make such a determination when presented with a request for a rulemaking on the issue by the state claimants. The Court ruled that the US EPA's failure to make the necessary determination
or offer a reasonable explanation for its refusal to do so was impermissible. While this case hinged on a provision of the CAA related to emissions of motor vehicles, a parallel provision of the CAA
applies to stationary sources such as electric generators, and there is litigation pending in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,Coke Oven Task Force v. Environmental
Protection Agency, in which the holding inMassachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,may be applied to
stationary sources such as power plants.

In
2004, several states and environmental organizations brought a complaint in federal court in New York, alleging that several electric utility corporations are jointly and severally
liable under a theory of public nuisance for damages caused by the alleged contribution to global warming resulting from carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants owned and
operated by these companies or their subsidiaries. EME Homer City was not named as a defendant in the complaint. The case was dismissed and is currently on appeal with the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit. In another

93

---



case
brought in April 2006, private citizens filed a complaint in the federal court in Mississippi against numerous defendants, including several electric utilities, arguing that emissions from the
defendants' facilities contributed to climate change and seeking monetary damages related to the 2005 hurricane season. In August 2007, the court dismissed the case entirely. The plaintiffs have
appealed this dismissal in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

On
October 18, 2007, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment rejected a permit to construct two proposed coal-fired electrical generators based on the impact
to health and the environment arising from the proposed units' emissions of carbon dioxide. This was the first reported rejection of a proposed coal plant permit based on a clean air statute. This
decision has been appealed. In addition, there are a number of pending cases in which environmental groups are arguing that air permits for the construction of major coal-fired generating
facilities cannot be issued unless the permits include best available control technology to control carbon dioxide emissions. The US EPA has taken the position that such controls are not required
until it finalizes regulations relating to carbon dioxide emissions.

The
ultimate outcome of the climate change debate could have a significant economic effect on EME Homer City. Any legal obligation that would require EME Homer City to reduce
substantially its emissions of carbon dioxide or that would impose additional costs or charges for the emission of carbon dioxide could have a materially adverse effect on EME Homer City. EME Homer
City will continue to monitor the federal, regional and state developments relating to regulation of GHG emissions to determine their impact on its operations. Requirements to reduce emissions of
carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions could significantly increase the cost of generating electricity from fossil fuels, especially coal, as well as the cost of purchased power.

Note 9. Related Party Transactions

EMMT Agreements

EME Homer City has entered into a master purchase, sale and services agreement with EMMT, pursuant to which EMMT arranges for purchases and sales of the following
products, including related services: (i) electric energy and capacity; (ii) fuel oil; and (iii) emission allowances.

EME
Homer City compensates EMMT in accordance with the following table with respect to these transactions and reimburses EMMT for brokers fees, taxes, and other reasonably incurred
direct out-of-pocket expenses. Payment for these services is due within 30 days of billing.

Service

CompensationEnergy and/or capacity

$.02/MWh ($.02/MW-day for capacity)Fuel oil

$.05/bblEmission allowances

$.25/SO2 allowance; and $25/NOX allowance


The net fees earned by EMMT were $0.5 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Beginning in the second quarter of 2003, EMMT began prepaying in full for the following month's expected power generation. As a result of the accelerated payments, EME
Homer City had payables due to EMMT of $72.8 million and $91.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

EME
Homer City entered into several transactions through EMMT for the purchase or sale of SO2 and NOX allowances. All transactions were completed at market price
on the date of the transaction. Net

94

---



consideration
paid by EME Homer City was $74.4 million, $27.4 million and $80.0 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Fuel Services Agreements

EME Homer City entered into an agreement with Edison Mission Energy Services, Inc. to provide fuel and transportation services related to coal and fuel
oil. Under the terms of this agreement, EME Homer City paid a service fee of $.06 for each ton of coal delivered and $.05 for each barrel of fuel oil delivered, plus the actual cost of the
commodities. The agreement terminated during 2006. The amount billable under this agreement for the service fee for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $0.3 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.

Affiliate Financing

EME Homer City obtained financing from Edison Mission Finance in connection with its acquisition of the Homer City facilities. For further discussion, see
Note 4Long-Term Debt.

Services Agreements with EME and Edison International

Certain administrative services such as payroll, employee benefit programs, insurance, and information technology are shared among all affiliates of Edison
International and the costs of these corporate support services are allocated to all affiliates. The cost of services provided by Edison International and EME, including those related to EME Homer
City, are allocated based on one of the following formulas: percentage of the time worked, equity in investment and advances, number of employees, or multi-factor (operating revenues, operating
expenses, total assets and total employees). EME Homer City participates in a common payroll and benefit program with all Edison International employees. In addition, EME Homer City is billed for any
direct labor and out-of-pocket expenses for services directly requested for the benefit of the partnership. EME Homer City believes the allocation methodologies are reasonable.
EME Homer City made reimbursements for the cost of these programs, payroll funding and other services totaling $33.9 million, $32.1 million and $31.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. EME Homer City had a net payable of
$0.3 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to Edison International related to these programs.

EME
Homer City participates in the insurance program of Edison International, including property, general liability, workers compensation and various other specialty policies. EME Homer
City's insurance premiums are generally based on its share of risk related to each policy. In connection with the property insurance program, a portion of the risk is reinsured by a captive insurance
subsidiary of Edison International.

Management and Administration Agreement with Midwest Generation EME, LLC

EME Homer City and Midwest Generation EME entered into a management and administration agreement pursuant to which Midwest Generation EME charges EME Homer City
for management and administrative services. Actual costs billable under this agreement for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $2.3 million, $2.7 million and
$2.9 million, respectively. EME Homer City had a payable of $0.1 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to Midwest Generation EME related
to this agreement.

95

---



Note 10. Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

Years Ended December 31,2007

2006

2005(in thousands)Cash paidInterest

$
171,666

$
115,136

$
161,433Income taxes


3,873


2,010


4,795Non-cash investing and financing activitiesNon-cash settlement of intercompany tax liabilities through an increase in the subordinated revolving loan agreement

$


$
60,154

$



Note 11. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

|2007                       |  | First |         | Second |   | Third(i) |  | Fourth |         | Total
|-------------------------- |  | ----- | ------- | ------ | - | -------- |  | ------ | ------- | -----
|
|Operating revenues         |  | $     | 197,573 |        | $ | 176,630  |  | $      | 198,837 |      
|Operating income           |  |       | 76,483  |        |   | 49,995   |  |        | 79,701  |      
|Provision for income taxes |  |       | 16,899  |        |   | 6,421    |  |        | 20,719  |      
|Net income                 |  |       | 24,739  |        |   | 10,404   |  |        | 28,615  |      

|2006                                 |  | First |         | Second |   | Third(i) |  | Fourth |         | Total
|------------------------------------ |  | ----- | ------- | ------ | - | -------- |  | ------ | ------- | -----
|
|Operating revenues                   |  | $     | 122,652 |        | $ | 148,080  |  | $      | 198,745 |      
|Operating income                     |  |       | 12,391  |        |   | 34,500   |  |        | 76,637  |      
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes |  |       | (9,062  | )      |   | 4,158    |  |        | 17,376  |      
|Net income (loss)                    |  |       | (12,559 | )      |   | 8,734    |  |        | 23,911  |      

---

96

---





PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I.(2)(c).

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Principal Officers

The Edison International Ethics and Compliance Code is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of Edison International and its majority-owned
subsidiaries, including EME Homer City. The Code is available on the Internet website maintained by EME Homer City's ultimate parent, Edison International, at www.edisonethics.com and is available in
print without charge upon request from Edison International's Corporate Secretary. Any amendments or waivers of Code provisions for EME Homer City's principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, will be posted on Edison International's Internet website at www.edisonethics.com.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I.(2)(c).

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I.(2)(c).

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I.(2)(c).

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT FEES

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to EME Homer City for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP:

EME Homer City Generation L.P.
($000)2007

2006Audit Fees

$
456

$
481Audit Related Fees





Tax Fees





All Other Fees








The Edison International Audit Committee reviews with management and pre-approves all audit services to be performed by the
independent accountants and all non-audit services that are not prohibited and that require pre-approval under the Securities Exchange Act. The Edison International

97

---



Audit
Committee's pre-approval responsibilities may be delegated to one or more Edison International Audit Committee members, provided that such delegate(s) presents any
pre-approval decisions to the Edison International Audit Committee at its next meeting. The Committee has delegated such pre-approval responsibilities to the Committee Chair.
The independent auditors must assure that all audit and non-audit services provided to EME Homer City have been approved by the Edison International Audit Committee.

During
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, all services performed by the independent accountants were pre-approved by the Edison International Audit Committee,
regardless of whether the services required pre-approval under the Securities Exchange Act.

98

---





PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

|(a) |  | (1) |  | List of Financial Statements                                                                                                                             
|--- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |     |  | See Index to Financial Statements at Item 8 of this report.                                                                                              
|    |  | (2) |  | List of Financial Statement Schedules                                                                                                                    
|    |  |     |  | Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
|    |  | (3) |  | List of Exhibits                                                                                                                                         

|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|----------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3.1         |  | Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of EME Homer City Generation L.P., dated as of December 7, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|4.1         |  | First Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of December 7, 2001 among Homer City Funding LLC and The Bank of New York, as successor trustee to United States Trust Company of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.1 to
EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                         
|4.1.1       |  | Form of 8.137% Senior Secured Bond due 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.1.1), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.2 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.1.2       |  | Form of 8.734% Senior Secured Bond due 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.1.1), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.3 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.1.3       |  | Assumption Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, among EME Homer City Generation, L.P., Homer City OL1 LLC, Homer City OL2 LLC, Homer City OL3 LLC, Homer City OL4 LLC, Homer City OL5 LLC, Homer City OL6 LLC,
Homer City OL7 LLC, Homer City OL8 LLC, Homer City Funding LLC and The Bank of New York as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.4 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
|4.2         |  | Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, between Homer City OL1 LLC, The Bank of New York, as Lease Indenture Trustee and Security Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to EME Homer City
Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                            
|4.2.1       |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement constituting Exhibit 4.2 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

99

---



|4.2.2 |  | Form of Initial Lessor Note (included in Exhibit 4.2), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2.2 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|4.3   |  | Facility Lease Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, between Homer City OL1 LLC and EME Homer City Generation L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.3.1 |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Facility Lease Agreement constituting Exhibit 4.3 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.4   |  | Participation Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, among EME Homer City Generation L.P., Homer City OL1 LLC, as Facility Lessor and Ground Lessee, Wells Fargo Bank Northwest National Association, General Electric Capital
Corporation, The Bank of New York as the Security Agent, The Bank of New York as Lease Indenture Trustee, Homer City Funding LLC and The Bank of New York as Bondholder Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to EME Homer City
Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
|4.4.1 |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Participation Agreement constituting Exhibit 4.4 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|4.4.2 |  | Appendix A (Definitions) to the Participation Agreement constituting Exhibit 4.4 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.2 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.5   |  | Owner Lessor Subordination Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, by and among Homer City OL1 LLC as the Owner Lessor, General Electric Capital Corporation as the Owner Participant and The Bank of New York, as the Lease Indenture Trustee,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                 
|4.5.1 |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Owner Lessor Subordination Agreement constituting Exhibit 4.5 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|4.6   |  | Lease Subordination Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, by and among Homer City OL1 LLC, as the Owner Lessor, GE Capital Corporation as the Owner Participant, EME Homer City Generation L.P. as Facility Lessee and The Bank of New
York as Security Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                
|4.6.1 |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Lease Subordination Agreement constituting Exhibit 4.6 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|4.7   |  | Pledge and Collateral Agreement made by Edison Mission Holdings Co. in favor of The Bank of New York, as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as Collateral Agent, dated as of December 7, 2001, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                
|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

100

---



|4.8    |  | Assumption and Release Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, among Edison Mission Holdings Co., Edison Mission Finance Co., EME Homer City Generation L.P. and The Bank of New York (as successor in interest to United States
Trust Company of New York), as Bondholder Trustee and Collateral Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                   
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|4.9    |  | Open-End Mortgage, Security Agreement and Assignment of Rents, dated as of December 7, 2001, among Homer City OLI LLC, as the Owner Lessor to The Bank of New York, as Security Agent and Mortgagee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|4.9.1  |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to Open-End Mortgage, Security Agreement and Assignment of Rents constituting Exhibit 4.9 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|10.1   |  | Guarantee, dated August 1, 1998, between Edison Mission Energy, Pennsylvania Electric Company, NGE Generation, Inc. and New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to Edison Mission
Energy's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|10.2   |  | Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, made by EME Homer City Generation L.P. in favor of The Bank of New York as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as Collateral Agent,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16.4 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                            
|10.3   |  | Amended and Restated Security Deposit Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, among EME Homer City Generation L.P. and The Bank of New York as Collateral Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.2 to EME Homer City
Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.4   |  | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated August 1, 1998, between Pennsylvania Electric Company, NGE Generation, Inc., New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and Mission Energy Westside, Inc., incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.4 to Edison Mission Energy's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|10.5   |  | Intercompany Loan Subordination Agreement, dated March 18, 1999, among Edison Mission Holdings Co., Edison Mission Finance Co., Homer City Property Holdings, Inc., Chestnut Ridge Energy Co., Mission Energy Westside Inc.,
EME Homer City Generation L.P. and United States Trust Company of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60.3 to Amendment No. 2 of Edison Mission Holdings Co.'s registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2000 (File No. 333-92047).
|10.5.1 |  | Amended and Restated Intercompany Loan Subordination Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, among Edison Mission Holdings Co., Edison Mission Finance Co., Homer City Property Holdings, Inc., Chestnut Ridge Energy Co.,
Mission Energy Westside, Inc., EME Homer City Generation L.P. and The Bank of New York, as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                            
|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

101

---



|10.6    |  | Amended and Restated Subordinated Revolving Loan Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2003, by and between EME Homer City Generation L.P., as Borrower and Edison Mission Finance Co., as Lender, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 8-K filed December 12, 2003.                                                                                                                                                         
|------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.7    |  | Designated Account Representative Agreement Relating to the NOX Allowance Program, entered into as of December 7, 2001, by and between EME Homer City Generation L.P., Homer City OL1 LLC, Homer City OL2 LLC, Homer City
OL3 LLC, Homer City OL4 LLC, Homer City OL5 LLC, Homer City OL6 LLC, Homer City OL7 LLC and Homer City OL8 LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2001.
|10.8    |  | Designated Account Representative Agreement Relating to the Acid Rain Program, entered into as of December 7, 2001, by and between EME Homer City Generation L.P., Homer City OL1 LLC, Homer City OL2 LLC, Homer City OL3 LLC,
Homer City OL4 LLC, Homer City OL5 LLC, Homer City OL6 LLC, Homer City OL7 LLC and Homer City OL8 LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.    
|10.9    |  | Assignment Agreement, dated December 7, 2001, between The Bank of New York, EME Homer City Generation L.P., Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc. and Edison Mission Energy Fuel Services, Inc., incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.29 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                                      
|10.10   |  | Sub-Assignment Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2001, between The Bank of New York, EME Homer City Generation L.P., Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc., and Edison Mission Energy Fuel Services, Inc., incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.                                                                                                                           
|10.11   |  | Amended and Restated Debt Service Reserve Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005, by and among Homer City OL1 LLC and Union Bank of California, N.A., as issuing bank and as agent, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.                                                                                                                      
|10.11.1 |  | Schedule identifying substantially identical agreements to the Amended and Restated Debt Service Reserve Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement constituting Exhibit 10.11 hereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.1 to EME
Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.                                                                                                                                                
|10.12   |  | Tax-Allocation Agreement, effective January 1, 2002, by and between EME Homer City Generation L.P. and Edison Mission Holdings Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|10.12.1 |  | Amendment No. 1 to Tax-Allocation Agreement, effective March 31, 2006, by and between EME Homer City Generation L.P. and Edison Mission Holdings Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to EME Homer City
Generation L.P.'s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.                                                                                                                                                                                     
|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

102

---



|10.13 |  | Master Purchase, Sale and Services Agreement, dated October 31, 2002, between EME Homer City Generation L.P. and Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to EME Homer City
Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.          
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.14 |  | Master Emissions Allowance Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 31, 2002, between EME Homer City Generation L.P. and Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to EME Homer
City Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
|10.15 |  | Power Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 31, 2002, between EME Homer City Generation L.P. and Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to EME Homer City
Generation L.P.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.                     
|10.16 |  | Management and Administration Agreement, effective as of April 27, 2004, between EME Homer City Generation L.P. and Midwest Generation EME, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.                     
|31.1* |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|31.2* |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|32*   |  | Statement Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

---

103

---





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

| |  | EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.(REGISTRANT)
| |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                       
| |  | By:                                       
| |  | Date:                                     

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

|Signature                                  |  | Title                                                                      |  | Date             
|------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|                                           |  |                                                                            |  |                  
|/s/ Guy F. GorneyGuy F. Gorney             |  | Director and President
(Principal Executive Officer)                       |  | February 27, 2008
|/s/ W. James ScilacciW. James Scilacci     |  | Director and Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)                  |  | February 27, 2008
|/s/ Mark C. ClarkeMark C. Clarke           |  | Vice President and Controller
(Controller or Principal Accounting Officer) |  | February 27, 2008
|/s/ Steven D. EisenbergSteven D. Eisenberg |  | Director and Vice President                                                |  | February 27, 2008

104

---



QuickLinks