alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2012 Final Allocation

9/6/2012

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII

Alabama $261,779 $77,420 $339,199

Alaska $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Arizona $347,967 $102,909 $450,876

Arkansas $164,541 $48,662 $213,203

California $1,703,874 $503,913 $2,207,787

Colorado $229,541 $67,886 $297,427

Connecticut $198,974 $59,907 $258,881

Delaware $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

District of Columbia $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Florida $1,231,886 $364,324 $1,596,210

Georgia $428,313 $126,671 $554,984

Hawaii $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Idaho $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Illinois $637,587 $197,384 $834,971

Indiana $334,046 $98,793 $432,839

Iowa $174,136 $55,927 $230,063

Kansas $147,117 $45,843 $192,960

Kentucky $232,425 $68,738 $301,163

Louisiana $224,480 $68,518 $292,998

Maine $84,298 $25,125 $109,423

Maryland $287,428 $85,005 $372,433

Massachusetts $356,900 $109,606 $466,506

Michigan $541,079 $160,862 $701,941

Minnesota $269,902 $79,822 $349,724

Mississippi $151,689 $45,198 $196,887

Missouri $328,398 $97,643 $426,041

Montana $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Nebraska $95,910 $29,770 $125,680

Nevada $133,223 $39,400 $172,623

New Hampshire $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

New Jersey $467,133 $143,950 $611,083

New Mexico $107,975 $31,933 $139,908

New York $1,032,690 $318,066 $1,350,756

North Carolina $496,728 $146,905 $643,633

North Dakota $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Ohio $641,170 $197,185 $838,355

Oklahoma $199,358 $60,208 $259,566

Oregon $215,742 $63,805 $279,547

Pennsylvania $757,545 $242,944 $1,000,489

Rhode Island $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

South Carolina $255,756 $75,639 $331,395

South Dakota $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Tennessee $343,142 $101,483 $444,625

Texas $1,058,604 $313,077 $1,371,681

Utah $99,550 $29,442 $128,992

Vermont $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

Virginia $397,834 $117,658 $515,492

Washington $339,099 $100,287 $439,386

West Virginia $118,529 $36,736 $155,265

Wisconsin $305,849 $90,453 $396,302

Wyoming $83,616 $25,125 $108,741

American Samoa $10,452 $3,141 $13,593

Guam $41,808 $12,563 $54,371

Northern Mariana Islands $10,452 $3,141 $13,593

Puerto Rico $213,051 $63,009 $276,060

Virgin Islands $41,808 $12,563 $54,371

TOTAL $16,723,160 $5,025,014 $21,748,174
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, August 30, 2011.

# PLACE: 

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS: 

The one item is open to the public.

## Matter To Be Considered

8275C Pipeline Accident Report—Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Rupture and Fire, San Bruno, California, September 9, 2010.

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: 

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour prior to the meeting for set up and seating.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Rochelle Hall at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, August 26, 2011.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: 

                        Candi Bing, (202) 314-6403 or by e-mail at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

Dated: August 12, 2011.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-21014 Filed 8-12-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Winner, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |  |  |                                         
|------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|             |  |  | 
|May 15, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    PHILIP S.
WINNER                 
|             |  |  |  |  |  | Philip S. Winner Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 28, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60975

Summary Calendar

 

LEONORA ZAKA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 196 696 

--------------------

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lenora Zaka, a citizen of Albania, petitions for review of

an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming

the immigration judge’s (IJ) decision to deny her application for

asylum and withholding of removal. 

We review legal conclusions de novo and findings of fact for

substantial evidence. Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 263 F.3d 442, 444

(5th Cir. 2001). We will reverse the BIA’s asylum determination

only if the evidence compels a different result. Girma v. INS,
No. 03-60975

-2-

283 F.3d 664, 669 (5th Cir. 2002); see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502

U.S. 478, 482-84 (1992). The Attorney General may grant asylum

to refugees. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1). A refugee is a person who

is outside of his or her country and is unable or unwilling to

return “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of

persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership

in a particular social group, or political opinion . . . .” 

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). 

Based on the IJ’s findings, the BIA concluded that Zaka had

not established past persecution or a well-founded fear of

persecution based on any of the statutorily enumerated grounds. 

After reviewing the record and the briefs, we conclude that the

BIA’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and that the

record does not compel a contrary conclusion. Zaka has failed to

show that the Government’s position in her case is inconsistent

with its position in another case pending before the Attorney

General. If Zaka believed that she was entitled to asylum under

proposed rules applicable to victims of domestic violence, she

could have raised this issue prior to the filing of her reply

brief. Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 324 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 324

Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2007

 Mr. Chambliss (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
Isakson, Mr. Lott, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Tester, Mr. Graham, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
 Sununu, and Mr. Whitehouse) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan;
Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families by helping 
        surviving members meet immediate and long-term financial obligations and 
        objectives in the event of a premature death in their family;
Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens lack the adequate level 
        of life insurance coverage needed to ensure a secure financial future 
        for their loved ones;
Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by 
        enabling individuals and families to manage the financial risks of 
        premature death, disability, and long-term care; and
Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2007 
        as ``National Life Insurance Awareness Month'' as a means to encourage 
        consumers to take the actions necessary to achieve financial security 
        for their loved ones: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Life 
        Insurance Awareness Month''; and
            (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, localities, 
        schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and the citizens 
        of the United States to observe the month with appropriate 
        programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.463 Lacombe Bayou. ( a ) The draw of the US190 bridge, mile 6.8 at Lacombe, shall open on signal if at least 48 hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Tammany Trace bridge, mile 5.2 at Lacombe, shall open on signal if at least 2 hours notice is given.
[USCG-2018-0953, 85 FR 45094, July 27, 2020]
**County Population**  **based on 2010**

**census Actual** 

**uncontrolled VOC emissions**  **Summer (tons) Actual** 

**uncontrolled VOC**  **emissions Winter (tons)**  **Controlled**

**VOC emissions**  **Summer (tons)**  **Controlled**

**VOC emissions**  **Winter (tons) Difference**  **between controlled**  **and uncontrolled**  **during**

**summer Tons** 

**Increase per Day** 

Cherokee 214346 10.01338774 4.957608634 8.0107102 1.288978245 2.0026775470.008208 Clayton 259424 12.11925158 6.000217696 9.6954013 1.560056601 2.4238503170.009934 Cobb 688078 32.14425185 15.91455606 25.715401 4.137784576 6.428850370.026348 Coweta 127317 5.947740972 2.944714893 4.7581928 0.765625872 1.1895481940.004875 Dekalb 691893 32.32247339 16.0027932 25.857979 4.160726231 6.4644946780.026494 Douglas 132403 6.185338548 3.062348987 4.9482708 0.796210737 1.23706771 0.00507 Fayette 106567 4.978383972 2.464788143 3.9827072 0.640844917 0.9956767940.004081 Forsyth 175511 8.199171876 4.059393919 6.5593375 1.055442419 1.639834375 0.006721 Fulton 920581 43.005862 21.29211795 34.40469 5.535950667 8.601172399 0.035251 Gwinnett 805321 37.62137584 18.62626941 30.097101 4.842830046 7.5242751670.030837 Henry 203922 9.526420152 4.716511938 7.6211361 1.226293104 1.90528403 0.007809 paulding 142324 6.648807984 3.291811796 5.31904640.855871067 1.329761597 0.00545 Rockdale 85215 3.98090394 1.970937735 3.1847232 0.512443811 0.7961807880.003263 **Total 13 county 212.6933698**  **105.3040704 170.1547** **27.37905829** 42.53867397**0.174339**

Difference between controlled and uncontrolled during

summer **42.53867397**

Difference between controlled and uncontrolled during winter

**77.92501206**
**Exhibit 12.1**

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(dollars in thousands)
| ** **                          | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended  September 30,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2006**                                            | ** ** | **2005**                                   | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                           |       |                                                |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                          |       | $                                                   | 43,770     |                                       | $          | 43,019 |   | $ | 58,705 |   | $ | 56,742 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |       | 34,751                                              |       | 34,585                                     |       | 46,633 |   | 41,836 |   | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   |
| Adjusted  earnings                  |       | $                                                   | 78,521     |                                       | $          | 77,604 |   | $ | 105,338 |   | $ | 98,578 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   |
|                                |       |                                                |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                      |       |                                                |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |       | $                                                   | 34,751     |                                       | $          | 34,585 |   | $ | 46,633 |   | $ | 41,836 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed  charges |       | 2.3                                                 | x          | 2.2                                        | x          | 2.3 | x | 2.4 | x | 2.2 | x | 2.7 | x | 3.3 | x |

 

----
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4695

_____________________________
J ARRED A VERA , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , D EPARTMENT OF R EVENUE , C HILD S UPPORT P ROGRAM and A MY L EIGH D ONELLA E ARLE , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from Florida Department of Revenue. Ann Coffin, Director, Child Support Program

. September 27, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jarred Avera, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee s

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-252-001]

Take notice that on May 22, 2000, Florida Gas Transmission Company (FGT) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, effective June 1, 2000:

Fortieth Revised Sheet No. 8A

Thirty-Second Revised Sheet No. 8A.01

Thirty-Second Revised Sheet No. 8A.02

Thirty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 8B

Twenty-Ninth Revised Sheet No. 8B.01

FGT states that on February 29, 2000, in Docket No. RP00-194-000, FGT filed to establish a Base Fuel Reimbursement Charge Percentage (Base FRCP) of 2.99% for the six-month Summer Period beginning April 1, 2000. The Base FRCP of 2.99% was accepted by Commission letter order issued March 23, 2000. Subsequently, on April 19, 2000, FGT filed a flex adjustment of 0.01% to be effective May 1, 2000, which resulted in an Effective FRCP of 3.00% when combined with the Base FRCP of 2.99%. In an order dated May, 2000, the Commission accepted the adjustment effective May 18, 2000, but directed FGT to file tariff sheets within seven days to revise the Effective FRCP to 2.99% effective June 1, 2000. FGT is making the instant filing in compliance with the Commission's May 18, order.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13626  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[669 NE2d 1110, 646 NYS2d 788]

#### Sedat Kuci, Appellant, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Respondent.

Argued June 4, 1996;

decided June 28, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco,*New York City *(Brian J. Isaac*and *Eliot H. Taub*of counsel), for appellant.

*924
      *Lawrence Heisler,*Brooklyn, and *Wallace D. Gossett*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation.

In this personal injury action, plaintiff was a passenger on a bus owned by defendant and driven by defendant’s employee. At trial, plaintiff testified that he was thrown across the aisle and hit his head against a metal pole when the moving bus came to an abrupt halt. According to the driver, he was leaving a designated bus stop when a car suddenly appeared on his left and turned right in front of the moving bus. The driver testified that he immediately applied his brakes to avoid hitting the car but was unable to avoid collision.

The jury found defendant liable for plaintiff’s injuries and awarded damages in his favor. Defendant subsequently moved to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), arguing that it was error for the trial court to refuse its instructions on the emergency doctrine. The court denied the motion, concluding that the driver’s familiarity with the intersection and knowledge that cars frequently turned right from the left lane in front of buses in this area rendered the charge inappropriate. The Appellate Division reversed, vacated the judgment and ordered a new trial.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorably toward giving the requested emergency doctrine instruction to the jury *(see, Rivera v New York City Tr. Auth.,*77 NY2d 322, 326), we agree with the Appellate Division that it was error to deny defendant’s request. Where some reasonable view of the evidence establishes that an actor was confronted by a sudden and unforeseen occurrence not of the actor’s own making, then the reasonableness of the conduct in the face of the emergency is for the jury *(id.,*at 327). Here, the bus driver’s testimony indicated that the car on his left suddenly and unexpectedly pulled in front of the moving bus. That a driver was aware that cars often made right turns in front of buses would not preclude a jury from deciding that, as to the events in issue in this case, the driver did not anticipate being suddenly cut off by this particular car.

In that we agree with the Appellate Division that the trial court’s erroneous refusal of the requested emergency doctrine *925instruction warranted a new trial, plaintiffs remaining claims become academic.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.