alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 100.1309 Special Local Regulation; Olympia Harbor Days Tug Boat Races, Budd Inlet, WA. ( a ) *Regulated area.* The following area is specified as a race area: All waters of Budd Inlet, WA the width of the navigation channel south of a line connecting the following points: 47°05.530′ N, 122°55.844′ W and 47°05.528′ N, 122°55.680′ W until reaching the northernmost end of the navigation channel at a line connecting the following points: 47°05.108′ N, 122°55.799′ W and 47°05.131′ N, 122°55.659′ W then southeasterly until reaching the southernmost entrance of the navigation channel at a line connecting the following points: 47°03.946′ N, 122°54.577′ W, 47°04.004′ N, 122°54.471′ W.
( b ) *Regulations.* In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR part 100, the regulated area shall be closed immediately prior to, during and immediately after the event to all persons and vessels not participating in the event and authorized by the event sponsor.
( c ) *Authorization.* All persons or vessels who desire to enter the designated race area created in this section while it is enforced must obtain permission from the on-scene patrol craft on VHF Ch 13.
( d ) *Notice of enforcement dates.* This Special Local Regulation will only be enforced during times announced by the Captain of the Port. The Captain of the Port will provide notice of the enforcement of this special local regulation by Notice of Enforcement in the Federal Register. Additional information may be available through Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners.
[USCG-2010-1024,76 FR 30827, May 27, 2011]
#### § 94.301 [Reserved]
Submitted on record and briefs February 18,

order modifiying probation reversed; remanded March 17, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent,*v. CHARLES DUDLEY WARNER, *Appellant.*

(91CR-1275; CA A76164)

848 P2d 146

George W. Kelly, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*727PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals an order modifying the terms of his probation. He contends that the court erred by not notifying him of the state’s request for modification or granting him a hearing on the motion. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession.

Order modifying probation reversed; remanded.
#### § 784.137 Relationship of exemption to exemption for “offshore” activities.

The reasons advanced for exemption of employment in “shore” operations, now listed in section 13(b)(4), at the time of the adoption of the original exemption in 1938, had to do with the difficulty of regulating hours of work of those whose operations, like those of fishermen, were stated to be governed by the time, size, availability, and perishability of the catch, all of which were considered to be affected by natural factors that the employer could not control (see 83 Cong. Rec. 7408, 7422, 7443). The intended limited scope of the exemption in this respect was not changed by transfer of the “shore” activities from section 13(a)(5) to section 13(b)(4). The exemption of employment in these “shore” operations may be considered, therefore, as intended to implement and supplement the exemption for employment in “offshore” operations provided by section 13(a)(5), by exempting from the hours provisions of the Act employees employed in those “shore” activities which are necessarily somewhat affected by the same natural factors. These “shore” activities are affected primarily, however, by fluctuations in the supply of the product or by the necessity for consumption or preservation of such products before spoilage occurs (see *Fleming* v. *Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.,* 113 F. 2d 52; cf. *McComb* v. *Consolidated Fisheries,* 174 F. 2d 74).
Oil Crops Outlook/ July 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 3

and intense U.S. competition offsets the price enhancing effects of the
Oil Crops Outlook/ July 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 4

yields is expected to slightly raise 1999 production to 6.0 million tons from

5.8 million last year.

As of late March, Canada’s seeding intentions survey indicated that Canadian

farmers intended to increase rapeseed planting 3 percent in 1999. Actual

rapeseed plantings might have been even larger, but extreme wetness stalled
Oil Crops Outlook/ July 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 5

The reduction in EU output and higher Ukrainian export duties should aid

1999/2000 Argentine exports of sunflowerseed and sunflowerseed products. Yet,

weaker vegetable oil prices are projected to scale back Argentine sunflower

plantings by 8 percent later this year. 
Oil Crops Outlook/ J'ly 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 6
Oil Crops Outlook/ July 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 7

Table 5--Cottonseed meal: U.S. supply and disappearance

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Supply Disappearance 

 -------------------------------- ------------------------------------

Year 

begin. Beg. rIm- Produc- Total Domestic Ex- Total End.

Oct. 1 stocks ports tion ports stocks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 -------------------------1,000 Short tons---------------------------


Oil Crops Outlook/ July 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 10

Table 10--Oilseed meal prices

---------------------------------------------------

 Soy- Cotton SunMarketing bean seed flower Peanut Linseed
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 438 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 438

  Authorizing the printing with illustrations of a document entitled 
   ``Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, 1867-2008''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2008

    Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Cochran) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the printing with illustrations of a document entitled 
   ``Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, 1867-2008''.

    Resolved, That there be printed with illustrations as a Senate 
document a compilation of materials entitled ``Committee on 
Appropriations, United States Senate, 1867-2008'', and that there be 
printed one thousand five hundred additional copies of such document 
for the use of the Committee on Appropriations.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 105.150 Right to appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal as described in § 101.420 of this subchapter.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Kenneth Cody Wood

, * From the 26th District

Court of Williamson County,

Trial Court No. 04

- 757

- K26

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00 194

- CR * February 28, 2013

State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be

dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
§ 100.922 Special Local Regulations; Annual Les Cheneaux Islands Antique Wooden Boat Show; Hessel, MI. ( a ) *Regulated area.* These Special Local Regulations apply to all U.S. navigable waters of Marquette Bay, Hessel, MI, within an area bordered by a line from the crib piles charted in position 45°59′59′′ N, 084°25′10′′ W to Red Buoy “8” charted in position 45°59′46′′ N, 084°25′37′′ W to Red Buoy “6” charted in position 45°59′58′′ N, 084°25′53′′ W to Red Buoy “4” charted in position 45°59′57′′ N, 084°26′23′′ W to Green Buoy “5” charted in position 46°00′13′′ N, 084°26′10′′ W to land in position 46°00′18′′ N, 084°26′04′′ W.
( b ) *Enforcement period.* These special local regulations are effective for one day in mid-August. The Coast Guard will issue a notice of enforcement with the exact time and date this regulated area will be enforced.
( c ) *Special local regulation.* While in the regulated area all vessels will operate at a no wake speed and follow the directions of the on-scene patrol commander.
[USCG-2018-0580, 83 FR 33125, July 17, 2018]
#### § 110.8 Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt.

(a) *Ticonderoga, N.Y.* An area shoreward of a line bearing 312° from Ticonderoga Light to the southeast corner of the New York State Boat Launching Ramp.

(b) *Essex, N.Y.* A small cove at the westerly side of Lake Champlain, shoreward of a line connecting the offshore ends of two promontories located at Essex.

(c) *Shelburne, Vt.* An area shoreward of a line bearing 142° from the eastern point of Collymer Pt. to Allen Hill.

(c-1) *Shelburne Bay.* Beginning at a point on the shoreline at latitude 44°25′53.0′′ N., longitude 73°14′47.3′′ W.; thence north to a point at latitude 44°26′04.8′′ N., longitude 73°14′46.6′′ W.; thence northwesterly to a point on the shoreline at latitude 44°26′06.9′′ N., longitude 73°14′50.2′′ W.; thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.

(c-2) *Shelburne Bay Allen Hill to La Platte River.* That portion of the waters of Shelburne Bay west of the line from a point at Allen Hill at latitude 44°24′35′′ N., longitude 73°14′14′′ W.; to a point near the mouth of the La Platte River at latitude 44°24′03′′ N., longitude 73°14′05′′ W.

(d) *Mallets Bay, Vt.* The southwesterly portion of Mallets Bay, south of Coates Island and west of a line bearing 170° from the most easterly point of Coates Island to the mainland.

(e) *Mallets Bay, Vt.* An area in the northwesterly portion of Mallets Bay, south of a line extending from the northeasterly end of Mallets Head to the northeasterly end of Marble Island, and west of a line extending from the northeasterly end of Marble Island to the northeasterly side of Cave Island, and southerly to the point on the lower east side of Mallets Head.

(f) *St. Albans Bay, Vt.* An area in the northerly portion of St. Albans Bay westward of the State Pier at St. Albans Bay State Park, northeasterly of a line bearing 296°30′ from the southwesterly corner of the State Pier, and southeasterly of a line parallel to and 500 feet west of the west side of the State Pier.

(g) *Charlotte, Vt.* An area shoreward of a line bearing 080 T from 44°16′12′′ N, 73°17′18′′ W, on Thompson's Point to 44°16′16′′ N, 73°16′40′′ W., on William's Point.

(h) *Burlington Harbor, VT.* The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 44°28′14.4′′ N | 73°13′16.5′′ W |
| 44°28′14.4′′ N | 73°13′19.5′′ W |
| 44°28′24.4′′ N | 73°13′18.4′′ W |

and thence along the shoreline to the point of the beginning. These positions have been converted to North American Datum 83.

(i) *Point Au Roche, New York.* The waters of Deep Bay north of a line drawn shore to shore along the 44°46′14′′ N line of Latitude.

[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by CGFR 70-16A, 35 FR 8823, June 6, 1970; CCGD3-80-2A, 45 FR 54755, July 18, 1980; CGD3-85-02, 51 FR 4593, Feb. 6, 1986; CGD1-90-063, 56 FR 12120, Mar. 22, 1991; CGD1 91-063, 58 FR 21104, Apr. 19, 1993; USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
§ 95.24 Program income. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, program income earned during the project period shall be retained by the recipient and added to funds committed to the project by DOL and recipient, and used to further eligible project or program objectives.
( b ) Recipients shall have no obligation to the Federal Government regarding program income earned after the end of the project period.
( c ) Costs incident to the generation of program income may be deducted from gross income to determine program income, provided these costs have not been charged to the award.
( d ) Proceeds from the sale of property are not program income and shall be handled in accordance with the requirements of the Property Standards (See §§ 95.30 through 95.37).
( e ) Unless DOL's regulations or the terms and condition of the award provide otherwise, recipients shall have no obligation to the Federal Government with respect to program income earned from license fees and royalties for copyrighted material, patents, patent applications, trademarks, and inventions produced under an award. However, Patent and Trademark Amendments (35 U.S.C. 18) apply to inventions made under an experimental, developmental, or research award.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 OAM 2021 Social Media
 Social Profile and Cover Images
Profile Image: Older Americans Month, Communities of Strength, May 2021     Social Media Cover Image: Communities of Strength, Older Americans Month, May 2021
White square with logo                         Facebook| Twitter
Social Feed Graphics
Click on an image to view/download the high-resolution version.

                    *Last modified on 03/29/2021*
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
Exhibit  3(i).4

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                      DIVERSIFIED PRODUCT INSPECTIONS, INC.


Pursuant  to  the  provision  of  section  607.1006,   Florida  Statutes,   this
corporation  adopts the  following  articles  of  amendment  to its  articles of
incorporation:

FIRST:    Amendment(s) adopted: (indicate article number(s) being amended, added
          or deleted)


     ARTICLE  I.  NAME.  The  name of the  corporation  shall  be  changed  from
Diversified Product  Inspections,  Inc. to Diversified  Product  Investigations,
Inc..  The  principal  place of  business  of this  corporation  shall be 3 Main
Street, Oakridge, TN 37830.


SECOND:   If  an  amendment  provides  for  an  exchange,   reclassification  or
          cancellation  of  issued  shares,   provisions  for  implementing  the
          amendment if not contained in the amendment itself, are as follows:

                        N/A


THIRD:    The date of each amendment's adoption:      May 19, 2000.

FOURTH:   Adoption of Amendment(s) check one:

____X___  The amendment(s)  was/were approved by the shareholders.
          The number of votes cast for the  amendment(s)  was/were
          sufficient for approval.

________  The amendment(s) was/were approved by the shareholders through voting
          groups.

          The following statements must be separately provided for
          each voting  group  entitled to vote  separately  on the
          amendment(s):

          "The number of votes cast for the amendment(s) was/were sufficient for
           approval by ______________________________________________
                                              (Voting Group)

________  The  amendment(s)  was/were  adopted  by  the  board  of
          directors  without  shareholder  action and  shareholder
          action was not required.



<PAGE>


________  The amendment(s) was/were adopted by the incorporators without
          shareholder action and shareholder action was not required.

            Signed this 19th day of May, 2000.



BY:         /s/ John Van Zyll
--------------------------------------------------------
            (By the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the
            Board of Directors, President, or other officer
            if adopted by the shareholders)
                                    OR
            (By a director if adopted by the directors)
                                    OR
            (By an incorporator if adopted by the incorporators)

    John Van  Zyll
----------------------------------------
Typed or printed Name

   President
---------------------------------------
Title
§ 810.130 Executive, Management, Research and Development, Engineering, and Other Personnel. The average hourly base wage rate does not include any hours worked by: ( a ) Executive or management staff who generally have the authority to make final decisions to hire, fire, promote, transfer and discipline employees;
( b ) Workers engaged in research and development; or
( c ) Engineers, mechanics, or technicians, if such personnel are not responsible for maintaining and ensuring the operation of the production line or tools and equipment used in the production of vehicles or parts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.665 Red River of the North.

The draws of the bridges need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          15,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,199
<PP&E>                                              26
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,072
<BONDS>                                             28
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,225
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,435
<CGS>                                              974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,182)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)


</TABLE>
#### Jonathan M. Baker et al., Respondents, v Jody Norman, Also Known as Jody N. Ordioni, et al., Appellants.

Submitted July 29, 1996;

decided October 15, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (CPLR 5513 [b]).
#### § 780.136 Employment in practices on a farm.

Employees engaged in building terraces or threshing wheat and other grain, employees engaged in the erection of silos and granaries, employees engaged in digging wells or building dams for farm ponds, employees engaged in inspecting and culling flocks of poultry, and pilots and flagmen engaged in the aerial dusting and spraying of crops are examples of the types of employees of independent contractors who may be considered employed in practices performed “on a farm.” Whether such employees are engaged in “agriculture” depends, of course, on whether the practices are performed as an incident to or in conjunction with the farming operations on the particular farm, as discussed in §§ 780.141 through 780.147; that is, whether they are carried on as a part of the agricultural function or as a separately organized productive activity (§§ 780.104 through 780.144). Even though an employee may work on several farms during a workweek, he is regarded as employed “on a farm” for the entire workweek if his work on each farm pertains solely to farming operations on that farm. The fact that a minor and incidental part of the work of such an employee occurs off the farm will not affect this conclusion. Thus, an employee may spend a small amount of time within the workweek in transporting necessary equipment for work to be done on farms. Field employees of a canner or processor of farm products who work on farms during the planting and growing season where they supervise the planting operations and consult with the grower on problems of cultivation are employed in practices performed “on a farm” so long as such work is done entirely on farms save for an incidental amount of reporting to their employer's plant. Other employees of the above employers employed away from the farm would not come within section 3(f). For example, airport employees such as mechanics, loaders, and office workers employed by a crop dusting firm would not be agriculture employees (*Wirtz* v. *Boyls dba Boyls Dusting and Spraying Service* 230 F. Supp. 246, aff'd per curiam 352 F. 2d 63; *Tobin* v. *Wenatchee Air Service,* 10 WH Cases 680, 21 CCH Lab Cas. Paragraph 67,019 (E.D. Wash.)).