alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 71.8 Preservation of records.

Each component shall preserve all correspondence relating to the requests it receives under this subpart, and all records processed pursuant to such requests, until such time as the destruction of such correspondence and records is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the U.S. Code and record schedules approved by the National Archives and Records Administration, and otherwise in accordance with retention requirements as published in the agency's system of records. Under no circumstances shall records be destroyed while they are the subject of a pending request for access, appeal, or lawsuit under the Act.
Order entered December 11, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01664
- CR LEMUEL MOSLEY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11
- 57352
- I



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS court reporter Kendra Thibodeaux’s December 5, 2013 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We ORDER Ms. Thibodeaux to file the complete reporter’s record, including exhibits, by FRID AY, JANUARY 17, 2014

. We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record by JANUARY 6,
2014

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, Kendra Thibodeaux, court reporter; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Argued and submitted December 30, 1992,

conviction and condition of probation vacated in part; otherwise affirmed March 17, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PAUL KEITH COURAUD, *Appellant.*

(CR10364; CA A73035)

848 P2d 628

Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Diane S. Lefkow, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

WARREN, P. J.

*552WARREN, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, assault on a public safety officer, ORS 163.208, and criminal trespass in the second degree. ORS 164.245. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation for 24 months. As a condition of probation, the court ordered defendant to serve 30 days in the county jail. Defendant contends that the court erred in imposing jail time as a condition of probation. We agree.

Defendant committed his crimes on February 12, 1991. Between that time and the time of sentencing, the legislature amended ORS 137.540(2) to authorize trial courts to impose jail time as a special condition of probation for misdemeanors. In *State v. Brown,*115 Or App 327, 329, 838 P2d 624 (1992), we concluded that the legislature intended that amendment to apply retroactively to any misdemeanor committed on or after November 1, 1989. Nevertheless, because the issue was not preserved, we did not decide in that case whether retroactive application of ORS 137.540(2) would violate the *ex post facto*clause of the Oregon Constitution.1 In *State v. Harding,*116 Or App 29, 33, 840 P2d 113 (1992), we reached that issue and concluded that ORS 137.540(2) could not be applied retroactively. Consequently, the court erred in imposing jail time as a special condition of defendant’s probation.

Defendant also contends that the court erred in failing to merge his conviction for assault in the fourth degree into his conviction for assaulting a public safety officer. The state concedes that error, and we accept its concession. Nevertheless, because the court did not impose a sentence for assault in the fourth degree, we need not remand for resentencing.

Conviction for assault in the fourth degree vacated; jail confinement as a condition of probation vacated; otherwise affirmed.

1

 Oregon Constitution, Article I, section 21, provides that “[n]o *ex-post facto*law * * * shall ever be passed * * *.”
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 5 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a President pro 

tempore. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of 

a President pro tempore. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Robert C. Byrd as 

3 President of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.299 Loxahatchee River. The draw of the Florida East Coast Railway bridge across the Loxahatchee River, mile 1.2 at Jupiter, operates as follows: ( a ) The bridge is not constantly tended.
( b ) The draw is normally in the fully open position, displaying flashing green lights to indicate that vessels may pass.
( c ) When a train approaches, the lights go to flashing red and a horn starts four blasts, pauses, and then continues four blasts. After an eight minute delay, the draw lowers and locks, providing the scanning equipment reveals nothing under the draw. The draw remains down for a period of eight minutes or while the approach track circuit is occupied.
( d ) After the train has cleared, the draw opens and the lights return to flashing green.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984; 49 FR 37381, Sept. 24, 1984; Redesignated by CGD07-04-015, 69 FR 42874, July 19, 2004]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24-a


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints each of William J. Cadogan and David F. Fisher, with
full power to each to act without the other, his or her true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for him or her and
in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the Company's fiscal year ended October 31, 1996, and any or all amendments to
said Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and to file the same with such other authorities as necessary, granting unto
each such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact and
agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 17th day
of December, 1996, by the following persons.


 /s/  William J. Cadogan                 /s/  James C. Castle, Ph.D.
-------------------------               -----------------------------
William J. Cadogan                      James C. Castle, Ph.D.


 /s/  Thomas E. Holloran                 /s/  B. Kristine Johnson
-------------------------               -----------------------------
Thomas E. Holloran                      B. Kristine Johnson


 /s/  Charles W. Oswald                  /s/  Irene M. Qualters
-------------------------               -----------------------------
Charles W. Oswald                       Irene M. Qualters


 /s/  Alan E. Ross                       /s/  Jean-Pierre Rosso
-------------------------               -----------------------------
Alan E. Ross                            Jean-Pierre Rosso


 /s/  Donald M. Sullivan                 /s/  John D. Wunsch
-------------------------               -----------------------------
Donald M. Sullivan                      John D. Wunsch


 /s/  Warde F. Wheaton
-------------------------
Warde F. Wheaton
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JIMMY SPIKES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2897

[ June 7, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312016CF001144A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A.

Folley, Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 

How-To Guide: Partnering with 

Grocery Stores

Why should we partner with a grocery store?

• Reduce food costs by integrating donated foods into menu.

• Leverage expertise of grocery store regarding seasonal foods to reduce food 

costs. 

• Establish a partnership to purchase foods wholesale to reduce food costs.

• Cross-promote your services.

• Help connect your participants to discount codes, coupons, or other health 

offerings at the grocery store. 

What are some potential partnership opportunities?

• Use food donations from grocery stores to stretch your budget.

o Contact your AAA's registered dietitian or local food-service inspection 

agency for assistance on how to incorporate donated food to your 

menus. 

o Donated fresh produce is more likely to be seasonal and better-tasting.

• Provide or deliver shelf-stable items to participants.

• Cater meals for your program; many grocery stores have the capacity to cook 

for large groups.

• Increase your participants' access to healthy food by cross-promoting your 

local grocery store's SNAP "double up" produce programs or other similar 

programs in your state. 

• Partner with grocery store pharmacies to offer your participants vaccines for 

COVID-19, flu, pneumonia, and other illnesses.
2

Where do we start?

Assess the situation! Ask yourself:

• Is your organization achieving its strategic goals? If not, how can a partnership 

with a grocery store assist your organization in achieving its goals?

• Specifically, what problem is this partnership looking to solve?

• What can this partnership do that cannot be done in-house?

• What organizational metrics can be met by this partnership?

• If you plan to purchase food from the grocery store, what product, 

programmatic, business and pricing goals do you have for your anticipated 

collaboration?

Where can we find more resources?

The Nutrition and Aging Resource Center website has links to many useful 

presentations, toolkits, and documents, including a step-by-step guide to

collaborating with food retailers and a section on groceries.

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for 

Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. 

Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express 

freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily 

represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services 

Programs. For more information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13693]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts, Special Projects Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Special Projects Advisory Panel (Research Section), to the 
National Council on the Arts will be held on June 12, 2000. The 
committee will meet from 1:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Room 716 at the Nancy 
Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20506, to 
assist in developing parameters for a national study of jazz artists in 
four cities.
    The agenda will tentatively include:

Discussion of the revised proposal and additional methodologies
Context--landscape for jazz artists in 4 cities
Definitions for the purpose of this study: What is jazz? What is a jazz 
artist?
Criteria for determining what is a jazz artist Response Driven Sampling 
(RDS) for interviews
Appropriateness of incentives for RDS
Kinds of analysis--context, data, comparisons, recommendations

    This meeting will be open to the public on a space available basis. 
Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Mr. Tom Bradshaw, Office of Policy Research & Analysis, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5527.

    Dated: May 26, 2000.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 00-13693 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6965

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EMMANUEL OLAMINDE OSHO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00223-TSE; 1:06-cv-00893-TSE)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 11, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Olaminde Osho, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Everett Lelling,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Olaminde Osho seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Osho has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Encuesta

ESTADO DEL

ENVEJECIMIENTO

LGBTQ+

SAGE trabaja para lograr una alta calidad de vida para las personas

mayores LGBTQ+. Con ese fin, estamos iniciando UNA NUE

ENCUESTA NACIONAL cada dos años para comprender mejor las

experiencias actuales, las necesidades y la capacidad de resiliencia

de las personas mayores LGBTQ + en los EE. UU.

QUIÉN QUÉ CUÁNDO

Si es mayor de 50 Una encuesta de La encuesta se

años Y se identifica 30 minutos en lanzará en 

como LGBTQ+, línea o por teléfono otoño del 2023.

¡queremos saber de

usted!

¡No Permita 

Lo Invisibilice

¡INSCRÍBASE AHORA PARA RECIBIR UNA

INVITACIÓN PARA COMPLETAR LA

ENCUESTA!

Haga clic aquí para inscribirse.

https://www.sageusa.org/SOLARegistro

DESIGN BY DPI.NYC
These are links to resources. To view each, 

hover over the link, hold down the Ctrl 

button, and right click. 

MENTAL HEALTH 

• Lessons Learned on Sustainability of 

Older Adult Community Behavioral 

Health Services

• Selecting Evidence-Based Practices 

for the Treatment of Depression in 

Older Adults

SUBSTANCE ABUSE 

• SAMHSA’s Get Connected Toolkit

• SAMHSA’s Prevention Pathways 

Courses

At Any Age, It Does Matter, Substance 

Abuse and Older Adults (for 

Professionals) 

Course | Description

Alcohol, Medication and Older Adults: 

For Those Who Care About 

Course | Description

SUICIDE PREVENTION 

• Promoting Older Adult Emotional 

Health: A Toolkit for Senior Living 

Communities

• Suicide Prevention Resource Center

WEBSITES 

• AoA Behavioral Health Webpage

• American Psychological Association

• Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention

• Center for Healthy Aging the National 

Council on Aging

• The Geriatric Mental Health Alliance 

of New York

• National Institute on Alcohol Abuse 

and Alcoholism

• National Institute on Drug Abuse

• National Institute of Mental Health

• National Institute of Health

• Substance Abuse and mental Health 

Administration 

Please note that this is sample of resources and 

is not meant to be exhaustive. Last update 

2/15/12

For more information about ACL

U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services, Administration for Community 

Living, Washington DC 20201

Phone: (202) 619 – 0724

Fax: (202) 357 – 3555

Email: ACLinfo@acl.hhs.gov

Web: http://www.aoa.gov

Resources-Older Adults Behavioral Health
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | • | the                  Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended                  September 30, 2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                  Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of                  1934;                  and |
|--|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|--|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |   |   |                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/ KENNETH              S. CRAGUN                                                                                |
|        |   |   | Kenneth                S. CragunChief                  Financial Officer and Chief Accounting                  Officer |

----
#### Rockford Insurance Company v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Company.

Filed November 21, 1893.

No. 5990.

Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J.

*John R. Hays,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mapes & Liceg*and *H. O. Brome, contra.**

Norval, J.

This case presents the same questions as in the case of *Omaha Fire Ins. Co. v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Co.,*38 Neb., 358, decided herewith. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, the motion to dismiss the proceeding in error is overruled and' the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [AK-962-1410-00-P] 

In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the provisions of Sec. 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to Old Harbor Native Corporation for the village of Old Harbor. The lands involved are in the vicinity of Old Harbor, Alaska. 

## U.S. Survey No. 10920, Alaska 

Containing 119.99 acres as shown on the plat of survey officially filed on November 25, 1992. 

## Seward Meridian, Alaska 

T. 33. S., R. 23 W., 

Sec. 5, lot 2; 

Sec. 6, lot 2; 

Sec. 8, lot 2; 

Sec. 9, lots 1 and 2; 

Sec. 10, lot 1. 

Containing 1,305.04 acres as shown on the plat of survey officially filed on April 16, 1999.

T. 33 S., R. 24 W., 

Sec. 12, lots 2, 3, and 4.

Containing 172.36 acres as shown on the plat of survey officially filed on December 3, 1999. Aggregating 1,597.39 acres. 

A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four (4) consecutive weeks, in the Kodiak Daily Mirror newspaper. Copies of the decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599; (907) 271-5960. 

Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional corporation, shall have until July 3, 2000, to file an appeal. However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights. 

Dennis R. Benson, 

Land Law Examiner, Branch of ANCSA Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 00-13793 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JA-U