alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Creating Responsive Partnerships within Continuums 

of Care with Centers for Independent Living and State 

Assistive Technology Programs to Improve Housing 

Stability and Reduce Homelessness

In 2017, AIM, a Center for Independent Living (CIL) in New York, began to explore how 

to create increased housing opportunities for people with disabilities experiencing or at 

risk of homelessness. AIM engaged with its local Continuum of Care (CoC) program to 

provide the services and supports individuals need to live healthy, successful, engaged 

lives in the community. At the time, the CoC did not have representation from disabilityspecific stakeholders. AIM became a partner of the CoC, of which CARES of NY, Inc. is 

the collaborative applicant. As a partner, AIM is working to increase the supply of 

affordable, accessible housing in the state. In addition, AIM is a regional TechnologyRelated Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities (TRAID) Center. The Center has 

facilitated assistive technology and accessibility solutions for individuals experiencing 

housing instability due to inaccessible home environment concerns.

Programs and Services

AIM currently provides two sites in its Supportive Housing Program for people with 

disabilities and young adults who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. While both 

are independent, AIM has staff on-site who advocate with and for residents and connect 

them to services. Placement in AIM’s supportive housing sites is through Coordinated 

Entry through Southern Tier Entry to Programs and Services (STEPS), the CoC

working to address homelessness in the region in partnership with CARES of NY.
2

AIM is currently working to expand with the addition of a supportive housing project for 

individuals with substance use disorder, set to open in 2023, and two additional projects

slated for 2025. AIM and its partners are working diligently to highlight what a robust, 

responsive network looks like.

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

• Learn how to step outside of your comfort zone and use your voice to enhance 

and expand the partnership network to more effectively address the needs of 

people with disabilities.

• Know how to identify partners with the necessary expertise to make the 

partnership work within the confines of program regulations.

• Identify the strengths and benefits of adding a disability-led program, like a CIL, 

to a CoC.

Funding Sources

Funding Source Federal State/Local Other

Supportive Housing for Older Adults and People 

with Disabilities

X

Supportive Housing for Individuals with 

Substance Use Disorder

X

Supportive Housing for Youth Experiencing 

Homelessness

X

TRAID Program X

Southern Tier Entry to Programs and Services 

(STEPS)

X

Contacts

John Zick, Chief Operating Officer, AIM Independent Living Center, jzick@aimcil.com

Kelsey Addy, MAP, Director of Planning, CARES of NY, Inc., kaddy@caresny.org

Melinda Dolezal, TRAID Director, NYS Justice Center, 

Melinda.Dolezal@Justicecenter.ny.gov
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAU-RON SYKES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

LOS ANGELES SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 16-56387 

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-05597-SJO-GJS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Shau-Ron Sykes appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from an alleged 

rape and assault in Los Angeles County Men’s Central Jail. We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-56387 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Belanus v. Clark, 796 F.3d 1021, 

1024 (9th Cir. 2015) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Watison v. Carter, 668 

F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We 

vacate and remand.

The district court determined that Sykes’ claims were time-barred and that 

Sykes is not entitled to equitable tolling. However, the district court failed to 

consider whether the statute of limitation should be tolled because Sykes “lack[ed]

the legal capacity to make decisions” at the time the claims accrued. Cal. Civ. 

Proc. § 352(a); see also Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 394 (2007) (“We have 

generally referred to state law for tolling rules, just as we have for the length of 

statutes of limitations.”). Therefore, we vacate and remand for the district court to 

consider this question in the first instance.

VACATED and REMANDED.
MICHAEL A. TORREY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5900

Opinion filed January 30, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Michael A. Torrey, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUAN RAMON PRADO LOPEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10269

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-00884-PJH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Juan Ramon Prado Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10269

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm but remand to the

district court to correct a clerical error in the judgment.

Prado Lopez contends that U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)’s 16-level sentencing

enhancement is flawed because it is not based on empirical evidence and because it

uses prior convictions in establishing an offense level. This contention fails

because this court has recognized that the enhancement reflects Congress’s intent

to increase penalties for aliens with prior convictions. See United States v.

Ramirez-Garcia, 269 F.3d 945, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2001).

Prado Lopez also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in

light of his employment history and community support. The district court did not

abuse its discretion in imposing Lopez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552

U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including

Lopez’s criminal history and prior deportations. See id.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it

delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United
3 12-10269

States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte

to delete reference § 1326(b)).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
Exhibit 99.1

     Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

R. Ray Pate, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, and Rebecca B. Crunk, Chief Financial
Officer, of NCRIC Group, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his/her capacity
as an officer of the Company that he/she has reviewed the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") and that to the
best of his/her knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



August 14, 2002                                       /s/ R. Ray Pate, Jr.
---------------                                   ------------------------
Date                                              R. Ray Pate, Jr.,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2002                                       /s/ Rebecca B. Crunk
---------------                                   ------------------------
Date                                              Rebecca B. Crunk,
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Richard Coglon, President and Chief Executive Officer of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp., and Robert Knight, Chief Financial Officer of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.

|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  |                                       
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                         |  |                                       
|                         |  |                                       
|                         |  | /s/ Richard Coglon                    
|                         |  | Richard Coglon                        
|                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer,
|                         |  | Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.           
|                         |  |                                       
|                         |  |                                       
|                         |  | /s/ Robert Knight                     
|                         |  | Robert Knight                         
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer,              
|                         |  | Heartland Oil and Gas Corp.           



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. and will be retained by Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANTONIO M. SALCEDO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4079

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 27, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands 

County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Daniel Muller, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6141

HENRY LEE GERALDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-340-2)

Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 2, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lee Geralds, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable

cause to appeal, see Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W.

4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298), and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Geralds v. Angelone, No. CA96-340-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0319.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:13PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/02/2010 02:27PM 

Subject: RICE NESHAP control costs memo 

Cortney, 

One of the memos that SBA requested was a memo on the estimated costs of control. The 

draft memo is attached. 

(See attached file: CI Control Costs 1-29-10 DRAFT.doc) 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0319.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM
#### § 110.93 Dana Point Harbor, Calif.

The area in Dana Point Harbor, Calif. commencing at a point at latitude 33°27′36.2′′ N., longitude 117°42′20.4′′ W.; thence 016°20′ True for 612 feet to a point at latitude 33°27′42.1′′ N., longitude 117°42′18.4′′ W.; thence 106°20′ True for 85 feet to a point at latitude 33°27′41.8′′ N., longitude 117°42′17.7′′ W.; thence 196°20′ True for 222 feet to a point at latitude 33°27′39.7′′ N., longitude 117°42′18.2′′ W.; thence 182°20′ True 234 feet to a point at latitude 33°27′37.4′′ N., longitude 117°42′18.2′′ W.; thence 166°20′ True for 499 feet to a point at latitude 33°27′32.6′′ N., longitude 117°42′16.8′′ W.; thence 320° True for 470 feet to the point of origin.

[CGD 76-197, 42 FR 44985, Sept. 8, 1977]
#### § 143.201 Existing MODUs exempted from new design requirements.

Any mobile offshore drilling unit built before, under construction on, or contracted for prior to April 5, 1982 is not required to meet the design requirements of this subpart until the unit is rebuilt. Until rebuilt, the unit must continue to comply with the design requirements applicable to the unit on April 4, 1982.

[CGD 78-160, 47 FR 11011, Mar. 15, 1982]
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

At December 31, 2000, the Company had five directly wholly owned subsidiaries:

      Morton Metalcraft Co., an Illinois corporation
      Morton Metalcraft Co., of North Carolina, a North Carolina corporation
      B & W Metal Fabricators, Inc., a North Carolina corporation
      Mid-Central Plastics, Inc., an Iowa corporation
      Morton Metalcraft Co. of South Carolina, a South Carolina corporation

At December 31, 2000, the Company owned 49% of Morton Holdings, LLC. Morton
Holdings, LLC owns 100% of Morton Custom Plastics, LLC. Morton Custom
Plastics, LLC holds the assets acquired in 1999 from Worthington Custom
Plastics, Inc. Quilvest Custom Plastics, Inc., an affiliate of shareholders
of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. owns 51% of Morton Holdings, LLC. Morton
Industrial Group, Inc., acts as the manager of Morton Holdings, LLC and is
allocated 100% of each item of Morton Holdings, LLC's income, gains, losses,
deductions and credits. Quilvest Custom Plastics, Inc. has granted Morton
Industrial Group, Inc., an irrevocable option to purchase its interest in
Morton Holdings, LLC at any time for the sum of One Thousand Dollars.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.557 Curtis Creek.

The draw of the I695 bridge, mile 1.0 at Baltimore, shall open on signal if at least a one-hour notice is given to the Maryland Transportation Authority in Baltimore.

[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 49411, Aug. 13, 2010]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-11 Notice of violation. ( a ) After investigation and evaluation of an alleged violation has been completed, an issuing officer may issue a Notice of Violation to the party.
( b ) The Notice of Violation will contain the following information: ( 1 ) The alleged violation and the applicable law or regulations violated;
( 2 ) The amount of the maximum penalty that may be assessed for each violation;
( 3 ) The amount of proposed penalty that appears to be appropriate;
( 4 ) A statement that payment of the proposed penalty within 45 days will settle the case;
( 5 ) The place to which, and the manner in which, payment is to be made;
( 6 ) A statement that the party may decline the Notice of Violation and that if the Notice of Violation is declined, the party has the right to a hearing prior to a final assessment of a penalty by a Hearing Officer.
( 7 ) A statement that failure to either pay the proposed penalty on the Notice of Violation or decline the Notice of Violation and request a hearing within 45 days will result in a finding of default and the Coast Guard will proceed with the civil penalty in the amount recommended on the Notice of Violation without processing the violation under the procedures described in 33 CFR 1.07-10(b).
( c ) The Notice of Violation may be hand delivered to the party or an employee of the party, or may be mailed to the business address of the party.
( d ) If a party declines the Notice of Violation within 45 days, the case file will be sent to the District Commander for processing under the procedures described in 33 CFR 1.07-10(b).
( e ) If a party pays the proposed penalty on the Notice of Violation within 45 days, a finding of proved will be entered into the case file.
( f ) If within 45 days of receipt a party— ( 1 ) Fails to pay the proposed penalty on the Notice of Violation; and
( 2 ) Fails to decline the Notice of Violation—the Coast Guard will enter a finding of default in the case file and proceed with the civil penalty in the amount recommended on the Notice of Violation without processing the violation under the procedures described in 33 CFR 1.07-10(b).
[CGD 93-079, 59 FR 66482, Dec. 27, 1994, as amended by USCG-2001-9175, 67 FR 38388, June 4, 2002]
**Exhibit 12.1**

**MGE Energy, Inc.**

****Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**
**Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003***(In thousands)*****Earnings** Income before interest        expense $42,416ATC equity earnings        (3,687)Income before interest        expense, net of ATC equity earnings 38,729Add: 
 Income tax items 
19,094
 Income tax on other income          
807
 Income distribution from equity          investee 
2,640
 AFUDC - borrowed funds 
230
 Interest on rentals* 
967
 Amortization of debt discount          
484*Total Earnings        Before Interest and Taxes*$62,950 **Fixed Charges** Interest on long-term        debt $11,558Amortization of debt        discount 484Other interest 218Interest on rentals*        967*Total Fixed        Charges*$13,227 **Ratio of        Earnings to Fixed Charges**4.76x
**Management believes that using  one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual  interest on rentals.*****
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, George J. Smith,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




                                                             /s/ George J. Smith
                                                             -------------------
                                                             George J. Smith
                                                             Treasurer
                                                             May 12, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc. and will be retained by First Bancorp
of Indiana, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.