alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50809-50810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Eleventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 220: Automatic Flight 
Guidance and Control

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Correction of Notice of RTCA Special Committee 220 meeting: 
Automatic Flight Guidance and Control.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 220: Automatic Flight Guidance and 
Control

DATES: The meeting will be held September 13-15, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m., unless stated otherwise.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street, 
Suite 910, NW., Washington, DC, 20036. For hotel information please 
view the following website: http://www.rtca.org/directions/directions.asp#hotels.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street, 
Suite 910, NW., Washington, DC, 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax 
(202) 833-9434, website http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), 
notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 220, Automatic Flight 
Guidance and Control

Agenda

Tuesday September 13--Thursday, September 15, 2011

Tuesday, September 13

    <bullet> Introductions and Administrative Items
    <bullet> Review of Meeting Agenda
    <bullet> Review and approval of summary from the first plenary 
meeting RTCA paper no. 011-11/SC220-024
    <bullet> Presentation of progress of Working Group-2
    <bullet> Presentation of progress of Working Group-3
    <bullet> Break-out sessions for Working Groups 2 and 3

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

    <bullet> Continue Break-out sessions for Working Groups 2 and 3
    <bullet> Continue development of Installation Guidance White Papers

Thursday, September 15, 2011

    <bullet> Return to general plenary meeting
    <bullet> Review of Working Group 2 Status--Progress, Issues and 
Plans
    <bullet> Review of Working Group 3 Status--Progress, Issues and 
Plans

[[Page 50810]]

    <bullet> Review of Action Items
    <bullet> Administrative items (meeting schedule, location, and next 
meeting agenda)
    <bullet> Any other business
    <bullet> Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 8, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-20744 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,458 and TA-W-37,458A]


House of Perfection, Incorporated, Williston Manufacturing Co., 
Williston, SC and Capitol City Manufacturing Co., West Columbia, SC; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance on April 13, 2000, applicable to 
workers of House of Perfection, Inc., Williston Manufacturing Co., 
Williston, South Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on May 11, 2000 (65 FR 30443).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in employment related to the production of children's apparel such as 
shorts, tops, blouses and pants for its parent company, House of 
Perfection, Incorporated, West Columbia, South Carolina. New 
information shows that Capitol City Manufacturing Co. is a division of 
House of Perfection, Incorporated. Worker separations will occur at the 
subject firm when it closes in June, 2000. The workers produce 
children's apparel such as shorts, tops, blouses and pants.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
the workers of Capitol City Manufacturing Co., West Columbia, South 
Carolina.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of House of Perfection, Incorporated who were adversely 
affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-37,458 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of House of Perfection, Incorporated, Williston 
Manufacturing Co., Williston, South Carolina (TA-W-37,458) and 
Capitol City Manufacturing Co., West Columbia, South Carolina (TA-W-
37,458A) who become totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after March 3, 1999 through April 13, 2002 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington DC this 18th day of May, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-13471 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### § 500.47 Place for filing application.

Application forms may be filed in any State Employment Service Office or in any office of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ArtemisInternational Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Ternier, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Patrick Ternier     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Patrick Ternier         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | March 30, 2005          |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Meeting with Textile Rental Services Association of America (TRSA) 

December 17, 2009 

EPA staff met with representatives from TRSA at EPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and 

Recovery (ORCR) in Potomac Yards, Arlington, VA. Attending for ORCR were Charlotte 

Mooney and Robert Kayser. Attendees from TRSA included John Wittenborn, Charles Sewell, 

Eric Waeckerlin. and Gary Haulmark. TRSA asked for the meeting to discuss the Notice of Data 

Availability (NODA) published in the Federal Register on October 27, 2009 concerning the 

updated risk analysis related to the proposed rule on management of Solvent-Contaminated 

Industrial Wipes (November 20, 2003; 68 FR 65586). 

TRSA discussed the possible use of analytical data for laundry sludge (TCLP) in the risk 

analysis. TRSA stated that they were attempting to collect and submit data from TRSA 

members, which would include analytical data for solvent levels in the sludge. TRSA also noted 

that more recent information indicates that current use of the hazardous waste solvents has 

decreased and that towel laundries have decreased water usage. TRSA also suggested that 

landfills used by laundries for sludge disposal are likely to be lined, and that they were willing to 

work with their members to encourage disposal of the sludge to landfill units with liners. 

EPA staff welcomed comments in response to the Notice of Data Availability and stated that 

EPA would consider any information submitted by TRSA related to the risk analysis as we make 

decisions on how to move forward with the risk analysis and the final rule.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (684)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         294,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,429)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        276,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,174
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,871
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,623
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
§ 110.9 Wells Harbor, Maine. ( a ) *Anchorage “A”.* All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 43°19′15.7′′ N, longitude 070°33′42.1′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′15.7′′ N, longitude 070°33′40.3′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′3.7′′ N, longitude 070°33′42.6′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′2.6′′ N, longitude 70°33′45.7′′ W; thence to the point of beginning. This area is approximately 5,800 sq. yards, encompassing the central portion of Wells Harbor.
( b ) *Anchorage “B”.* All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 43°19′11.1′′ N, longitude 070°33′49.8′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′10.5′′ N, longitude 070°33′47.3′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′8.3′′ N, longitude 070°33′47.3′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′8.7′′ N, longitude 070°33′50.6′′ W; thence to the point of beginning. This area is approximately 25,000 sq. yards, encompassing the western portion of Wells Harbor.
( c ) *Anchorage “C”.* All of the waters enclosed by a line beginning at latitude 43°19′17.7′′ N, longitude 070°33′34.0′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′18.4′′ N, longitude 070°33′32.9′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′13.8′′ N, longitude 070°33′25.5′′ W; thence to latitude 43°19′13.0′′ N, longitude 070°33′26.2′′ W; thence to the point of beginning. This area is approximately 8,200 sq. yards, encompassing the eastern portion of Wells Harbor.
[USCG-2011-0231, 77 FR 25590, May 1, 2012]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

d1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

138996 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138996 

 COA: 290289 

Wayne CC: 04-000545-01 

TYRONE HERMAN WARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 20, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Rockingham

No. 6421

#### State of New Hampshire v. John L. Pomeroy

November 30, 1973

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *Robert V. Johnson II,*assistant attorney general *(Mr. Johnson*orally), for the State of New Hampshire.

*William P. Shea,*by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Per curiam.

The sole issue in this case is whether the failure of a complaint filed in the superior court on appeal from a municipal court to show the attestation of the municipal court justice in accordance with RSA 597:10 (Supp. 1972) required the dismissal of the charges against the defendant in the superior court.

*611Defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court of Epping on April 17, 1971, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1972) and appealed to the superior court. After a jury was impaneled and the presentation of the State’s case began, defendant moved for dismissal on the ground that there was not “a properly executed or attested complaint before the Court”. The basis of the motion was that the complaint had not been attested by the municipal court as required by RSA 597:10 (Supp. 1972). At the end of the trial the State’s motion to amend by adding the attestation was granted, subject to exception which was transferred by *Morris,*J.

RSA 597:10 (Supp. 1972) provides as follows: “In case of appeal the municipal and district courts shall cause true and attested copies of the complaint, other process, records and recognizances, together with any cash bail in the case to be filed with the clerk of the superior court within ten days after the date of such order for recognizance.”

The complaint upon which defendant was tried in the superior court was identical to the one upon which he was tried in the municipal court. There is no claim that it is different or that it is inadequate in any way except for the lack of attestation. The requirement of attestation may be met by amendment under RSA 601:8 and does not entitle the defendant to have the matter dismissed. *State v. Davis,*43 N.H. 600 (1862); *State v. Green,*105 N.H. 260, 197 A.2d 204 (1964).

*Exceptions overruled.*
### Hydrology of stock-water development in southeastern Idaho

By: R.F. Hadley

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1475P

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

# AGENCY:

Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of Notice of Availability of Funds. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice rescinds the Notice of Availability of funds in notice FR Doc. 99-21257, Part II, in the issue of Wednesday, August 18, 1999 on the following page, 45016, in column 2, last line, “Special Projects of National Significance. In the table on page 45019, in the section HIV/AIDS Programs, under “Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS).” On page 45032, in column 3, from heading “Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS)” through to bottom of this column. 

Dated: May 16, 2000.

Claude Earl Fox,

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-12753 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Kenneth Cody Wood, * From the 26th District

 Court of Williamson County,

 Trial Court No. 04-757-K26.

Vs. No. 11-12-00194-CR * February 28, 2013

State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be 

dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11
 
                             AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
 
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          SIX MONTHS ENDED  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                               JUNE 30            JUNE 30
                                          ----------------- -------------------
                                            1998     1997     1998      1997
                                          -------- -------- --------- ---------
                                          (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                       <C>      <C>      <C>       <C>
Net income .............................  $127,493 $110,473 $  65,470 $  55,900
                                          ======== ======== ========= =========
Average shares of common stock outstand-
 ing*...................................   120,168  124,852   119,369   124,031
                                          ======== ======== ========= =========
Earnings per common share*..............  $   1.06 $   0.88 $    0.55 $    0.45
                                          ======== ======== ========= =========
Diluted average shares of common stock
 outstanding*...........................   122,176  125,804   122,154   124,991
                                          ======== ======== ========= =========
Diluted earnings per common share*......  $   1.04 $   0.88 $    0.54 $    0.45
                                          ======== ======== ========= =========
</TABLE>
--------

* Restated for three-for-two common stock split in April 1998.