alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 578.1 What does this part cover?

Section 9 of the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1989 amended section 16(e) of the Act to provide that any person who repeatedly or willfully violates the minimum wage (section 6) or overtime provisions (section 7) of the Act shall be subject to a civil money penalty not to exceed $1,100 for each such violation. In 2001, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) adjusted this penalty for inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-410), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-134, section 31001(s)). The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 amended section 16(e) of the Act to reflect this increase. *See* Public aw. 110-233, sec. 302(a), 122 Stat. 920. Section 1201(b)(3) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, amended section 16(e) to add that any person who violates section 3(m)(2)(B) of the Act shall be subject to a civil money penalty not to exceed $1,100. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-410), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-134, section 31001(s)) and the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-74, section 701), requires that inflationary adjustments be annually made in these civil money penalties according to a specified cost-of-living formula. This part defines terms necessary for administration of the civil money penalty provisions, describes the violations for which a penalty may be imposed, and describes criteria for determining the amount of penalty to be assessed. The procedural requirements for assessing and contesting such penalties are contained in part 580 of this chapter.

[85 FR 86791, Dec. 30, 2020]
Nutrition Services Incentive Program for the States/Territories

FY 2012 Final Cash Allocation

9/6/2012

State/Territory

Nutrition Services 

Incentive Program

Alabama $2,933,316

Alaska $372,212

Arizona $2,118,282

Arkansas $2,637,872

California $12,976,341

Colorado $1,499,399

Connecticut $1,423,479

Delaware $495,729

District of Columbia $505,439

Florida $7,187,763

Georgia $2,768,572

Hawaii $483,221

Idaho $701,581

Illinois $6,902,253

Indiana $1,788,180

Iowa $2,119,990

Kansas $1,972,161

Kentucky $1,831,731

Louisiana $3,277,072

Maine $629,641

Maryland $1,648,593

Massachusetts $4,885,300

Michigan $7,257,628

Minnesota $1,956,106

Mississippi $1,365,451

Missouri $4,070,380

Montana $930,440

Nebraska $1,168,951

Nevada $953,138

New Hampshire $1,180,291

New Jersey $3,667,607

New Mexico $2,015,025

New York $15,385,497

North Carolina $3,330,755

North Dakota $814,498

Ohio $5,706,030

Oklahoma $2,337,289

Oregon $1,793,200

Pennsylvania $7,112,252

Rhode Island $449,215

South Carolina $1,589,875

South Dakota $965,896

Tennessee $1,675,968

Texas $12,079,291

Utah $1,368,532

Vermont $779,950

Virginia $2,280,760

Washington $2,093,766

West Virginia $1,657,818

Wisconsin $2,689,202

Wyoming $793,487

Guam $371,257

Northern Mariana Islands $58,148

Puerto Rico $2,893,191

Virgin Islands $180,074

TOTAL $154,129,095
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 8.15 Motions; extensions of time. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, any application for an order or other relief shall be made by motion. Except when made orally before the Board, motions shall be in writing and shall be accompanied by proof of service on all other parties. If a motion is supported by briefs, affidavits, or other papers, they shall be served and filed with the motion. Any party may respond to the motion within such time as may be provided by the Board.
( b ) Requests for extension of time as to the filing of papers or oral presentation shall be in the form of a motion under paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 109.20 Publication; notice of proposed rule making. ( a ) Section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), requires publication of general notice of proposed rule making in the Federal Register (unless all persons subject thereto are named and either personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law), except to the extent that there is involved ( 1 ) any military, naval, or foreign affairs function of the United States or
( 2 ) any matter relating to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. Except where notice or hearing is required by statute, this requirement does not apply to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice, or in any situation in which the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.
( b ) General notice of proposed rule making published in accordance with the above will include ( 1 ) a statement of the time, place, and nature of public rule making proceedings;
( 2 ) reference to the authority under which the rule is proposed; and
( 3 ) either the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17727, Dec. 12, 1967]
# Plate Waste Audit Instructions

https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2008/Audits_and_More_Manual.pdf___.YXAzOmJldGFoOmE6bzpkNmYwNDYxZWU2ZGRlMjM0ZDczYjgzMWUyYzgzYmE4NTo2OjczODI6YTBhYjc5ZThlZjg3OTU5Y2JmNDljZGUxOWEyYTA1NzY3N2E4M2JmOTQ1YjJhMjMyNmIwZWExY2M4OWQ4MDNlYTpwOlQhttps://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Student_Food_Waste_Audit_FINAL_4-6-2017.pdf___.YXAzOmJldGFoOmE6bzpkNmYwNDYxZWU2ZGRlMjM0ZDczYjgzMWUyYzgzYmE4NTo2OjcwZTU6NDVlMDg3MDNkYmJkZWI2NDA0ZTRlYzk2Yzg1NWI4MjU0ZGJmOWFmYjMzYTFjN2RkNGE3YzZlYWI4MTJmYjk2ZDpwOlQhttps://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-01/foodwaste_audit_tool.xlsm___.YXAzOmJldGFoOmE6bzpkNmYwNDYxZWU2ZGRlMjM0ZDczYjgzMWUyYzgzYmE4NTo2OmFlOGE6OTMwZWQwYWY1ZTlhMjEwZDRhNjllMmRmYzhmNTk3MmIwZDdhM2U3OGM1NmQwMmVlMTVhYmY4ZmNhNjg1Yzk4MzpwOlQ

# Plate Waste Audit Tool

Food Item Percent Waste 

# image1.png
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC00-92-000]

Take notice that on May 17, 2000, Nevada Sun-Peak Limited Partnership and Sun-Peak Power, LLC (Applicants) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824b, and Part 33 of the Commission's regulations, a joint Application requesting that the Commission approve the transaction by which Sun-Peak Power, LLC will acquire general and limited partnership interests in Nevada Sun-Peak Limited Partnership, and a request for expedited consideration. Pursuant to 18 CFR 388.112, Applicants request confidential treatment of Exhibit H to the Application.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street,  NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18  CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 16, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13222  Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34500-34501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-058]


Notice of Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). The information is used by NASA 
attorneys and technology transfer specialists to determine if a 
licensee is achieving and maintaining practical application of the 
licensed inventions as required by its license agreement.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposal for the 
collection of information should be received on or before July 31, 
2000.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Harry Lupuloff, 
Office of the General Counsel, Code GP, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001. All comments will become a 
matter of public record and will be summarized in NASA's request for 
OMB approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Reports: None
    Title: Patent License Report.

[[Page 34501]]

    OMB Number: 2700-0010.
    Type of review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: Information is used to determine if a licensee is 
achieving and maintaining practical application of the licensed 
inventions as required by its license agreement.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit
    Number of Respondents: 60.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 60.
    Hours Per Request: 30 min.
    Annual Burden Hours: 30.
    Frequency of Report: Annually.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-13354 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### § 788.17 Employees employed in both exempt and nonexempt work.

The exemption for an employee employed in exempt work will be defeated in any workweek in which he performs a substantial amount of nonexempt work. For enforcement purposes nonexempt work will be considered substantial in amount if more than 20 percent of the time worked by the employee in a given workweek is devoted to such work. Where two types of work cannot be segregated, however, so as to permit separate measurement of the time spent in each, the employee will not be exempt.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Serena Software, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert I. Pender, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
presented.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    ROBERT I. PENDER,
JR.Robert I. Pender, Jr. Senior Vice President,
Finance And Administration, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer)


Date: June 12, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Serena Software, Inc. and will be retained by Serena Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This Certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 106.410 Submission and approval. ( a ) The owner or operator of each OCS facility currently in operation must either— ( 1 ) Submit one copy of the Facility Security Plan (FSP) for review and approval to the cognizant District Commander and a letter certifying that the FSP meets the applicable requirements of this part; or
( 2 ) If intending to operate under an Approved Alternative Security Program, submit a letter signed by the OCS facility owner or operator stating which approved Alternative Security Program the owner or operator intends to use.
( b ) Owners or operators of OCS facilities not in service on or before December 31, 2003, must comply with the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section 60 days prior to beginning operations.
( c ) The cognizant District Commander will examine each submission for compliance with this part and either: ( 1 ) Approve it and specify any conditions of approval, returning to the submitter a letter stating its acceptance and any conditions;
( 2 ) Return it for revision, returning a copy to the submitter with brief descriptions of the required revisions; or
( 3 ) Disapprove it, returning a copy to the submitter with a brief statement of the reasons for disapproval.
( d ) An FSP may be submitted and approved to cover more than one OCS facility where they share similarities in physical characteristics, location, and operations.
( e ) Each OCS facility owner or operator that submits one FSP to cover two or more OCS facilities of similar design, location, and operation must address OCS facility-specific information that includes the physical and operational characteristics of each OCS facility.
( f ) An FSP that is approved by the cognizant District Commander is valid for 5 years from the date of its approval. The cognizant District Commander will issue an approval letter, as indicated in § 106.115 of this part.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60558, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39173, July 1, 2013; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016]
#### City of Petersburg *v.*Todd.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Feb. 6, 1896.)*

[24 S. E. Rep. 232.]

Defective Street — Action for Injuries — Sufficiency of Evidence.*

In an action for injuries from an obstruction in a street, based on defendant’s failure to provide lights or signals, where the evidence showed that plaintiff was injured as alleged, and that defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the injury, and no error appears in the instructions, a judgment for plaintiff will be affirmed.

Error to hustings court of Petersburg.

Action by Burwell Todd against the city of Petersburg for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*Geo.*Mason, for plaintiff in error.

*Alexander*Hamilton, for defendant in error.

*

See monographic note on “Municipal Corporations” appended to Danville *v.*Pace, 25 Gratt. 1 (Va. Rep. Anno.).

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action of trespass on the case brought in the hustings court of the city of Petersburg upon the following cause of action: On the 19th day of December, 1891, the plaintiff, while driving along one of the streets of the city of Peters-*302burg, in a two-wheeled vehicle, commonly called a “jumper,” came into collision with an iron water plug projecting above the ground more than one foot, thereby, overturning his vehicle, and causing him very serious- injury. The allegation is that there was no light or signal at or near the water plug to disclose its situation ; that it was a dangerous obstruction in the street or highway, well known to the defendant, which permitted it to remain, notwithstanding its dangerous character, and without taking any care or precaution for the protection of persons driving or riding along said street. These are the material facts, which are stated, with certain variations, in each one of the several counts in the declaration. To this declaration there was a demurrer, but no reason is assigned which we deem at all meritorious or worthy of particular comment. The demurrer being overruled, the defendant pleaded not guilty, a jury was sworn, and evidence was introduced before them which fully sustains every averment of the declaration, and establishes beyond question the injury done to the plaintiff, and the negligence of the defendant as the proximate cause thereof. The learned judge before whom the case was tried instructed the jury fairly, fully, and intelligently upon every question arising upon the case submitted to them. We do not think any of the assignments of error well taken, and the judgment complained of is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2011-8-15); Docket DOT-OST-2010-0126.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding California-Palomar Airlines, Inc. d/b/a California Pacific Airlines fit, willing, and able, and awarding to it a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than August 24, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0126 and addressed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785.

Robert A. Letteney,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2011-20948 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.25-80 Payment of fees, charges or sales. ( a ) The payment of fees and charges must be made by postal money order or check payable to the “Treasurer of the United States” or “U.S. Coast Guard,” and sent to the office of the Coast Guard performing the service or furnishing or delivering the record, document, or certificate. If copy is to be transmitted by registered, air, or special delivery mail, postal fees therefor will be added to fees provided in this subpart (or the order must include postage stamps or stamped return envelopes).
( b ) The fee is payable in advance.
[CGFR 67-13, 32 FR 11211, Aug. 2, 1967]