alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 526 

Designating April 20 through 26, 2008, as ‘‘National Community Health 

Aide, Community Health Practitioner, and Dental Health Aide Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2008 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. STEVENS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 20 through 26, 2008, as ‘‘National Community Health Aide, Community Health Practitioner, 

and Dental Health Aide Week’’. 

Whereas Alaska experienced one of the most extreme tuberculosis epidemics in recorded history in the 1950s; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program in Alaska was 

created during the 1950s, in response to the unique 

health care needs of remote Alaskan communities; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program, which currently consists of 550 Community Health Aides and 

Community Health Practitioners and 40 Dental Health 

Aides, serves 178 isolated Alaskan communities to provide emergency, primary health care, and oral health 

care; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 526 ATS 

Whereas Community Health Aides, Community Health Practitioners, and Dental Health Aides have proven their 

dedication to serving Alaskans and their ability to work 

in some of the most challenging and diverse settings in 

the world; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program is the only 

program of its kind in the United States, and other countries have modeled their delivery of rural health care 

after this program; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program has proven to 

be effective, efficient, and essential in improving the 

health of the inhabitants of rural Alaska; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program is a patient’s 

first contact within the network of health care professionals in the Alaska Tribal Health Care System and is 

one of the most effective means of delivering health care 

services to Alaskan communities; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program was created 

with a focus on tuberculosis, meningitis, and other infectious diseases, but now successfully cares for other common diseases such as diabetes and heart disease; 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program also serves 

the oral health needs of Alaskans, and is in the process 

of adding services to address the behavioral health needs 

of rural Alaska; and 

Whereas the Community Health Aide Program has successfully adapted over the last 50 years to the ever-evolving 

health care landscape of Alaskan communities: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates April 20 

2 through 26, 2008, as ‘‘National Community Health Aide, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 526 ATS 

1 Community Health Practitioner, and Dental Health Aide 

2 Week’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Nutrition Services Incentive Program for the States/Territories

FY 2013 Final Cash Allocation

9/5/2013

State/Territory

Nutrition Services

Incentive Program

Alabama $2,717,066

Alaska $361,153

Arizona $1,852,626

Arkansas $2,469,995

California $11,778,198

Colorado $1,257,978

Connecticut $1,341,616

Delaware $441,764

District of Columbia $448,777

Florida $6,247,984

Georgia $2,584,490

Hawaii $449,797

Idaho $661,378

Illinois $6,040,150

Indiana $1,713,783

Iowa $1,853,368

Kansas $1,842,339

Kentucky $1,613,303

Louisiana $3,037,339

Maine $562,507

Maryland $1,507,170

Massachusetts $4,082,108

Michigan $6,758,859

Minnesota $1,723,958

Mississippi $1,385,842

Missouri $3,926,098

Montana $803,677

Nebraska $1,111,943

Nevada $918,420

New Hampshire $1,075,409

New Jersey $3,470,661

New Mexico $1,878,920

New York $14,534,734

North Carolina $3,147,453

North Dakota $756,288

Ohio $5,179,861

Oklahoma $2,130,135

Oregon $1,665,493

Pennsylvania $5,452,243

Rhode Island $411,542

South Carolina $1,518,521

South Dakota $851,097

Tennessee $1,521,882

Texas $10,766,639

Utah $1,254,473

Vermont $749,547

Virginia $2,062,772

Washington $1,973,427

West Virginia $1,562,065

Wisconsin $2,550,472

Wyoming $766,328

Guam $309,967

Northern Mariana Islands $43,406

Puerto Rico $2,747,118

Virgin Islands $178,800

TOTAL $140,052,939
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11077

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TERESA RODRIGUEZ ESTRADA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-85-ALL

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Teresa Rodriguez Estrada appeals from the sentence imposed following

her conviction of bank fraud. Estrada contends that the district court erred by

adjusting her offense level for using sophisticated means because her position

as an officer at the Omni American Federal Credit Union allowed her

legitimately to open accounts, make transfers and withdrawals, and pledge

collateral. According to Estrada, the district court properly adjusted her offense

level for abusing her position. However, she argues, her conduct was not

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11077

2

intricate or complex enough to warrant an adjustment for using sophisticated

means. 

Estrada’s creation of 39 bogus accounts and her use of those accounts to

conduct transactions were at least as sophisticated as the schemes at issue in

United States v. Wright, 496 F.3d 371 (5th Cir. 2007), and United States v.

Clements, 73 F.3d 1330 (5th Cir. 1996), where we affirmed sophisticated-means

adjustments. Moreover, application of two different adjustments to the same

course of conduct does not constitute double counting if each adjustment targets

a different aspect ofthe defendant’s behavior. United States v. Scurlock, 52 F.3d

531, 540 (5th Cir. 1995). The use of sophisticated means to commit the offense

and Estrada’s abuse of her position to commit the offense were different aspects

of her behavior;therefore, the sophisticated-means adjustment did not constitute

double counting. See id.

AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134128 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

VIVIAN JOHNSON, M.D.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134128 

 COA: 271705 

Oakland CC: 2005-066404-CZ 

MILLENNIUM TREATMENT SERVICES,

L.L.C., DARLENE KAKOS, and JUNE 

ABRAHAM, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Wade, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 14, 2005
                                    By:    /s/ Richard Wade
                                           Richard Wade, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Vertical Computer
Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 553.230 Maximum hours standards for work periods of 7 to 28 days—section 7(k).

(a) For those employees engaged in fire protection activities who have a work period of at least 7 but less than 28 consecutive days, no overtime compensation is required under section 7(k) until the number of hours worked exceeds the number of hours which bears the same relationship to 212 as the number of days in the work period bears to 28.

(b) For those employees engaged in law enforcement activities (including security personnel in correctional institutions) who have a work period of at least 7 but less than 28 consecutive days, no overtime compensation is required under section 7(k) until the number of hours worked exceeds the number of hours which bears the same relationship to 171 as the number of days in the work period bears to 28.

(c) The ratio of 212 hours to 28 days for employees engaged in fire protection activities is 7.57 hours per day (rounded) and the ratio of 171 hours to 28 days for employees engaged in law enforcement activities is 6.11 hours per day (rounded). Accordingly, overtime compensation (in premium pay or compensatory time) is required for all hours worked in excess of the following maximum hours standards (rounded to the nearest whole hour):

| Work period (days) | Maximum hours standards | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Fire protection | Law enforcement |
| 28 | 212 | 171 |
| 27 | 204 | 165 |
| 26 | 197 | 159 |
| 25 | 189 | 153 |
| 24 | 182 | 147 |
| 23 | 174 | 141 |
| 22 | 167 | 134 |
| 21 | 159 | 128 |
| 20 | 151 | 122 |
| 19 | 144 | 116 |
| 18 | 136 | 110 |
| 17 | 129 | 104 |
| 16 | 121 | 98 |
| 15 | 114 | 92 |
| 14 | 106 | 86 |
| 13 | 98 | 79 |
| 12 | 91 | 73 |
| 11 | 83 | 67 |
| 10 | 76 | 61 |
| 9 | 68 | 55 |
| 8 | 61 | 49 |
| 7 | 53 | 43 |
§ 9.4 Exclusions. ( a ) *Small contracts* — ( 1 ) *General.* The requirements of this part do not apply to prime contracts under the simplified acquisition threshold set by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 134), and any subcontracts of any tier under such prime contracts.
( 2 ) *Application to subcontracts.* The amount of the prime contract determines whether a subcontract is excluded from the requirements of this part. If a prime contract is under the simplified acquisition threshold, then each subcontract under that prime contract will also be excluded from the requirements of this part. If a prime contract meets or exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and meets the other coverage requirements of § 9.3, then each subcontract for services under that prime contract will also be subject to the requirements of this part, even if the value of an individual subcontract is under the simplified acquisition threshold.
( b ) *Federal service work constituting only part of employee's job.* This part does not apply to employees who were hired to work under a Federal service contract and one or more nonfederal service contracts as part of a single job, provided that the employees were not deployed in a manner that was designed to avoid the purposes of Executive Order 14055.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve A. Fall, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|                |  | /s/ Steven A. Fall     
|                | 
|August 14, 2007 |  | Steven A. Fall         
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.460 La Carpe Bayou.

The draw of the S661 bridge, mile 7.5, shall open on signal if at least four hours advance notice is given; except that, the draw need not be opened for the passage of vessels Monday through Friday except holidays from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.

[CGD8-90-05, 55 FR 33289, Aug. 15, 1990]
To learn more, please visit www.aphis.usda.gov

United States 

Department of

Agriculture

If you spot it, report it at www.AsianLonghornedBeetle.com Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

APHIS 81-35-018

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Revised July 2013
null

448.94635
NOX Notes

YES, NOx Only

YES, non-NOx Model Available

NO, but NOx Model Available

NO, No NOx Model Available
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>     0000064500
<NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                         12,885
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               2,654,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  107,000
<INVENTORY>                                                 3,142,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            5,901,696
<PP&E>                                                      1,323,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                                693,053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              7,518,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       4,985,757
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                       248
<COMMON>                                                      123,771
<OTHER-SE>                                                  2,318,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                7,518,426
<SALES>                                                    13,766,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           13,766,868
<CGS>                                                       7,640,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              13,149,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               31,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            309,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               293,004
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   40,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           253,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  253,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
ex10.28

 

 Exhibit 10.28
 

 

 Mr. Steve Hicks
 SOUTHRIDGE PARTNERS II, LP
 90 Grove Street
 Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877
 

 June 1, 2012
 

 

 Dear Steve,
 

 This communication is intended to provide written notice to SOUTHRIDGE PARTNERS II, LP that ENTEST BIOMEDICAL, INC. is terminating, effective June 1, 2012, the EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT entered into as of the 27th day of February, 2012 by and between SOUTHRIDGE PARTNERS II, LP, Delaware limited partnership, and ENTEST BIOMEDICAL, INC., a Nevada corporation.
 

 Sincerely,
 

 /s/David Koos
 David Koos
 Chairman and CEO
§ 110.50b Mystic Harbor, Groton and Stonington, Conn. ( a ) *Area No. 1.* Beginning at Ram Point on the westerly side of Mason Island at latitude 41°19′44′′, longitude 71°58′42′′; thence to latitude 41°19′30′′, longitude 71°58′43′′; thence to latitude 41°19′36′′, longitude 71°58′58′′; thence to latitude 41°19′45′′, longitude 71°58′56′′; thence to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area No. 2.* Beginning at a point about 250 feet southerly of Area 1 and on line with the easterly limit of Area 1 at latitude 41°19′27′′, longitude 71°58′44′′; thence to latitude 41°19′19′′, longitude 71°58′45′′; thence to latitude 41°19′25′′, longitude 71°58′59′′; thence to latitude 41°19′33′′, longitude 71°58′58′′; thence to the point of beginning.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA MARIA HANASH,

Appellant,

v.

WALTER ANTIQUES, INC. AND

NANCY WALTER, INDIVIDUALLY,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00054

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012

- DCV05940)

J U D G M E N T

The judgment of the Court issued on March 9, 2018 is withdrawn, and the following is the

judgment of the Court.

The Court has co nsidered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellees

recover from Appellant all costs, both in this Court and the court below. This decis ion shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27 TH DAY OF JUNE , 2018.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### § 125.57 Applications previously denied.

A person who has been denied a Coast Guard Port Security Card before May 1, 1956, may file a new application for such a document in accordance with the requirements of this part.
#### In the Matter of the Adoption of Jarrett. Karen Doe et al., Respondents; Jill H. et al., Appellants.

Submitted June 17, 1996;

decided July 9, 1996

Motions by Steven J. and Jill H. for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that simultaneous appeals do not lie to both the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals. Motions by Steven J. and Jill H. for a stay dismissed as academic. Motions by Steven J. and Jill H. for a preference dismissed as academic.
ACL Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA)

FY 2017 Annual Allocation

9/30/2017

State

Priority 1 - 

SHIPs

Priority 2 - 

AAAs

Priority 3 - 

ADRCs Total for State

Alabama $250,631 $138,689 $89,024 $478,344

Alaska $30,311 $16,781 $7,885 $54,977

Arizona $204,515 $113,111 $105,137 $422,763

Arkansas $231,519 $128,140 $54,578 $414,237

California $946,016 $522,887 $159,888 $1,628,791

Colorado $124,379 $68,815 $73,197 $266,391

Connecticut $90,048 $49,786 $57,922 $197,756

Delaware $40,671 $22,510 $16,708 $79,889

District Of Columbia $14,366 $7,938 $8,144 $30,448

Florida $700,047 $387,047 $372,352 $1,459,446

Georgia $389,399 $215,511 $140,726 $745,636

Hawaii $65,810 $36,413 $22,642 $124,865

Idaho $90,206 $49,953 $26,219 $166,378

Illinois $392,939 $217,375 $190,389 $800,703

Indiana $272,683 $150,896 $106,062 $529,641

Iowa $169,031 $93,613 $52,760 $315,404

Kansas $118,955 $65,872 $44,893 $229,720

Kentucky $298,924 $165,502 $79,321 $543,747

Louisiana $209,110 $115,680 $73,346 $398,136

Maine $99,967 $55,370 $28,226 $183,563

Maryland $132,590 $73,319 $86,142 $292,051

Massachusetts $193,275 $106,843 $112,400 $412,518

Michigan $354,681 $196,252 $162,876 $713,809

Minnesota $208,972 $115,678 $84,450 $409,100

Mississippi $213,426 $118,170 $51,479 $383,075

Missouri $285,302 $157,914 $6,450 $449,666

Montana $68,092 $37,714 $13,308 $119,114

Nebraska $84,236 $46,650 $28,960 $159,846

Nevada $80,418 $44,473 $42,121 $167,012

New Hampshire $63,458 $35,142 $24,653 $123,253

New Jersey $188,809 $104,327 $137,507 $430,643

New Mexico $101,472 $56,165 $34,544 $192,181

New York $677,726 $374,681 $307,856 $1,360,263

North Carolina $492,793 $272,711 $103,373 $868,877

North Dakota $33,120 $0 $0 $33,120

Ohio $420,005 $232,358 $198,381 $850,744

Oklahoma $180,514 $99,932 $62,389 $342,835

Oregon $156,210 $86,476 $69,999 $312,685

Pennsylvania $481,215 $266,181 $232,747 $980,143

Rhode Island $28,833 $15,932 $18,693 $63,458

South Carolina $250,857 $138,802 $87,143 $476,802

South Dakota $47,386 $26,247 $14,446 $88,079

Tennessee $344,983 $190,924 $113,771 $649,678

Texas $767,401 $424,461 $336,977 $1,528,839

Utah $71,957 $39,827 $29,981 $141,765

Vermont $47,502 $26,313 $12,159 $85,974

Virginia $291,211 $161,159 $124,782 $577,152

Washington $194,989 $107,908 $110,586 $413,483

West Virginia $140,652 $77,877 $38,189 $256,718

Wisconsin $229,242 $126,922 $97,087 $453,251

Wyoming $31,951 $0 $0 $31,951

Total $11,602,805 $6,383,247 $4,452,868 $22,438,920
§ 103.520 Recordkeeping. ( a ) All records pertaining to the Area Maritime Security (AMS) Assessment and AMS Plan will be retained by the COTP for 5 years.
( b ) Exercise documentation will be kept by the COTP for 2 years.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




The Board of Directors
Mercury General Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
62228) on Form S-3 of Mercury General Corporation and the registration statement
(No. 333-01583) on Form S-8 of Mercury General Corporation of our reports dated
February 1, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mercury General
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2001, and all related schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2001,
annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury General Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 25, 2002