alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - 15 CFR Part 930
          - [Docket No. 990723202-9202-01]
          - RIN 0648—AM88

# AGENCY:

Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC).

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

On April 14, 2000, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) proposed to revise the federal consistency regulations. The comment period expired on May 30, 2000. This document reopens the public comment period on the proposed rule until June 15, 2000.

      ( print page 34996)    

# DATES:

Comments on the proposed rule will be considered if mailed on or before June 15, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

All comments concerning these proposed regulations should be mailed to Joseph A. Uravitch, Chief, Coastal Programs Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (N/ORM3), 1305 East-West Highway, 11th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David W. Kaiser, Federal Consistency Coordinator, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (N/ORM3), 1305 East-West Highway, 11th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Telephone: 301-713-3098, extension 144.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 14, 2000, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOA) proposed to revise the federal consistency regulations, 65 FR 20270, April 14, 2000. The time for public comment expired on May 30, 2000. Prior to the expiration of the comment period, OCRM received several requests to extend the time for public comment on the proposed rule. OCRM has decided to extend the original 45 day comment period to 60 days. Because the comment period has already expired, this document reopens the public comment period. The time for the public to submit comments now ends on June 15, 2000.

Dated: May 26, 2000.

John Oliver,

Director, Management and Budget Office, National Ocean Service.

[FR Doc. 00-13685  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

CAROL ANN CARTER, MONICA PARRILLA, REBECCA POYOUROW, WILLIAM TUNG, ROSEANNE MILAZZO, BURT SIEGEL, SUSAN CASSANELLI, LEE CASSANELLI , LYNN WACHMAN, MICHAEL GUTTMAN, MAYA FONKEU, BRADY HILL, MARY ELLEN BALCHUNIS, TOM DEWALL, STEPHANIE MCNULTY AND JANET TEMIN,

Petitioners

v.

LEIGH M. CHAPMAN , IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 7 MM 2022

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2 nd d ay of February, 2022, given the impasse between the

legislative and executive branches concerning the adoption of congressional districts

, and

in view of the impact that protracted appeals will have on the election calendar, and time

being of the essence, Petitioners’ Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief is

GRANTED, and Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S. § 726 is EXERCISED

.[ 7 M M 2022 ]

- 2

Consistent with the process established in Mellow v. Mitchell , 607 A.2d 204

(Pa. 1992), it is hereby ORDERED :

1. Th e consolidated actions docketed in the Commonwealth Court at

Nos. 464 M.D. 2021 and 465 M.D. 2021 shall remain consolidated for all purposes in this

Court

.

2. T he Honorable Patricia A. McCullough

, a jurist on the Commonwealth Court of

Pennsylvania who cur rently is presiding over the consolidated actions below

, is

designated to serve as a Special Master.

3. The proceedings occurring in the Commonwealth Court prior to the issuance of

this Order

, and the filings submitted to th at court at its direction in fu rtherance of those

proceedings

, shall be considered part of the Special Master’s record.

4. T he Special Master shall file with this Court on or before February 7, 2022

, a

report containing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting her

recommendation of a redistricting plan from those submitted to the Special Master

, along

with a proposed revision to the 2022 election schedule/calendar.

5 . On or before February 14, 2022, any Party or Amicus Participant previously

designated by the court below may file with this Court exceptions to the Special Master’s

report along with a brief in support thereof. This Court will hold oral argument on these

exceptions in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on February 18 , 2022

, beginning at 9:30 a.m.

The stay issue d by this Court on January 31, 2022, is hereby LIFTED

. The

Gressman Petitioners’ Request for Clarification is DISMISSED AS MOOT

.

Chief Justice Baer and Justice Dougherty file concurring statement s

. Justice Mundy files a dissenting statement in which Justi ce Brobson joins.
January 24, 2011 

Robert A. Bernicchi 

Managing Director of Engineering 

Alaska Airlines 

19300 International Blvd. 

Seattle, WA 98188 

Dear Mr. Berncchi: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We’ve received your December 23, 2010, petition on behalf of Alaska Airlines (Alaska) for 

an exemption from § 121.344(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This 

exemption, if granted, would allow Alaska the continued operations of Alaska’s B737-890 

series aircraft for 12 months from December 6, 2010 without complying with 14 CFR 

§ 121.344(f) and part 121 Appendix M (footnote 18) parameter accuracy for both pitch 

control surface position and rudder control input force. The following aircraft are affected: 

Make/Model Serial # Line # Variable # Registration # Delivery Date 

737-890 35201 3511 YL135 N533AS Jan. 21, 2011 

737-890 35202 3523 YL136 N534AS Jan. 24, 2011 

737-890 35200 3558 YL137 N535AS Feb. 21-25, 2011 

We’ve added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0002) and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information. 

How We’ll Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. 
2 

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4059. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frances Shaver 

Program Analyst 

Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 521 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United States 

Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2008 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber 

of the United States Senate. 

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules 

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United 

3 States Capitol (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the 

4 Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole 

5 and specific purpose of permitting the Senate Photo6 graphic Studio to photograph the United States Senate 

7 in actual session on Tuesday, June 3, 2008, at the hour 

8 of 2:15 p.m. 

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 521 ATS 

1 therefore, which arrangements shall provide for a min2 imum of disruption to Senate proceedings. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### § 106.245 Procedures for interfacing with vessels.

The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that there are measures for interfacing with vessels at all MARSEC Levels.
§ 94.505 How are violations of this part determined for recipients who are individuals? An individual recipient is in violation of the requirements of this part if the Secretary of Labor or designee determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The recipient is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 563 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 563

    Designating September 13, 2008, as ``National Childhood Cancer 
                            Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2008

   Mr. Allard (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 22, 2008

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

                              May 22, 2008

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating September 13, 2008, as ``National Childhood Cancer 
                            Awareness Day''.

Whereas more than 10,000 children under the age of 15 in the United States are 
        diagnosed with cancer annually;
Whereas every year more than 1,400 children under the age of 15 in the United 
        States lose their lives to cancer;
Whereas childhood cancer is the number one disease killer and the second overall 
        leading cause of death of children in the United States;
Whereas 1 in every 330 children under the age of 20 will develop cancer, and 1 
        in every 640 adults aged 20 to 39 has a history of cancer;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer has increased from 56 
        percent in 1974 to 79 percent in 2000, representing significant 
        improvement from previous decades; and
Whereas cancer occurs regularly and randomly and spares no racial or ethnic 
        group, socioeconomic class, or geographic region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Congress--
            (1) designates September 13, 2008, as ``National Childhood 
        Cancer Awareness Day'';
            (2) requests that the Federal Government, States, 
        localities, and nonprofit organizations observe the day with 
        appropriate programs and activities, with the goal of 
        increasing public knowledge of the risks of cancer; and
            (3) recognizes the human toll of cancer and pledges to make 
        its prevention and cure a public health priority.
                                 <all>
```
§ 13.01-35 Description of gold and silver bars. ( a ) The bar is plain and horizontal, composed of the same metal as the medal previously awarded recipient, and is 1 and 5 ⁄ 8ths inches long by 3 ⁄ 16ths of an inch wide with a flowing ribbon draped over the left end and passing in back and appearing beneath the bar. The part of the ribbon showing beneath the bar bears the inscription “Act of Congress, August 4, 1949”, in raised block letters. The bar and ribbon are in folds of a spray of laurel with the leave showing above and beneath.
( b ) Engraving: Before presentation, the recipient's name shall be inscribed on the obverse of the bar.
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.300 Preparedness communications. ( a ) *Notification of MARSEC Level change.* The COTP will communicate any changes in the MARSEC Levels through a local Broadcast Notice to Mariners, an electronic means, if available, or as detailed in the AMS Plan.
( b ) *Communication of threats.* When the COTP is made aware of a threat that may cause a transportation security incident, the COTP will, when appropriate, communicate to the port stakeholders, vessels, and facilities in his or her AOR the following details: ( 1 ) Geographic area potentially impacted by the probable threat;
( 2 ) Any appropriate information identifying potential targets;
( 3 ) Onset and expected duration of probable threat;
( 4 ) Type of probable threat; and
( 5 ) Required actions to minimize risk.
( c ) *Attainment.* ( 1 ) Each owner or operator of a vessel or facility required to have a security plan under parts 104 or 105 of this subchapter affected by a change in the MARSEC Level must ensure confirmation to their local COTP the attainment of measures or actions described in their security plan and any other requirements imposed by the COTP that correspond with the MARSEC Level being imposed by the change.
( 2 ) Each owner or operator of a facility required to have a security plan under part 106 of this subchapter affected by a change in the MARSEC Level must ensure confirmation to their cognizant District Commander the attainment of measures or actions described in their security plan and any other requirements imposed by the District Commander or COTP that correspond with the MARSEC Level being imposed by the change.
[USCG-2003-14792, 68 FR 39278, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60472, Oct. 22, 2003]
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

HRES1 PROPERTIES TRUST

400 Centre Street

Newton, MA 02458

 

 

October26, 2004

 

 

VIA TELECOPY AND FEDERAL EXPRESS

 

HealthSouthCorporation

OneHealthSouth Parkway

Birmingham,AL 35243

Attention:  William C. Horton, Esq.

 

**NOTICEOF TERMINATION**

 

Amended,Restated, and Consolidated Master

LeaseAgreement, dated as of January 2, 2002

 

Ladiesand Gentlemen:

 

Referenceis made to the captioned agreement (the “Lease”).  Capitalized terms used and not otherwisedefined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Lease.

 

OnMay 3, 2004, Landlord gave Tenant written notice of several Defaults pursuantto Sections 18.2(a), (b), and (d) of the Lease. Landlord’s June 18th notice gave written notice of additionaldefaults pursuant to Sections 18.2(d) and (f).

 

Landlord’sJune 18th notice declared an Event of Default because 30 days hadpassed and the Defaults were continuing. Landlord agreed to suspend the Event of Default for a period which endedon September 15th.  To theextent that Tenant may have required additional time to cure the Defaultspursuant to 18.2(a) and 18.2(b) of the Lease, the cure period pursuant toSection 12.1(b), which is capped at 120 days in the aggregate, has passed.

 

Dueto the occurrence of multiple Events of Default, Landlord hereby providesnotice of termination of the Lease pursuant to Section 12.1.

 

----

 

Pursuantto Section 5.4, Tenant is required to use its best efforts to transfer and tocooperate with Landlord or Landlord’s nominee in connection with the processingof all applications for licenses, operating permits, and other governmentalauthorizations and all contracts which may be necessary for operation of theFacilities.  Pursuant to Section 5.4 ofthe Lease, HRES1 hereby requests HealthSouth to continue to manage bothFacilities for so long as necessary to obtain necessary licenses, operatingpermits, and other governmental authorization. For these services HRES1 hereby proposes to pay HealthSouth a managementfee equal to five percent (5%) of gross revenues received (net of contractualreserves, bad debts, and the like) which fee HRES1 believes to be commerciallyreasonable.  In the event you disagreewith this fee amount, HRES1 hereby agrees to reimburse HealthSouth allreasonable out of pocket costs and expenses and reasonable administrative costswhich HealthSouth may incur in providing these services as may be determined byaudit.

 

Wewill be contacting you to arrange an orderly transition at the Facilitieswithout any disruption to the operations, patients, and staff.  Effective immediately, HealthSouth will bedeemed to be managing the Facilities for HRES1’s account pursuant to Section5.4 and therefore all net cash flows from the operation should be remitted to HRES1.

 

Very truly yours,

 

 
| /s/  David J. Hegarty |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
| David  J. Hegarty     |
| President             |

 

 

cc:           Mr. C. Richard Byrd, III

Mr. Art Wilson

 

2

----
#### § 106.258 Risk Group classification for OCS facilities.

For the purposes of this subchapter, no OCS facilities are considered Risk Group A.

[USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016]
RE: Averaging Times 

Steve Hill 

to: 

Roger Kohn 

09/28/2011 02:16 PM 

Cc: 

Gary Rubenstein 

Show Details 

Responses below

From: Kohn.Roger@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kohn.Roger@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:23 PM 

To: Steve Hill 

Subject: Averaging Times

 

Steve, 

Whenever you get a chance, can you tell me the averaging times for the NOx limits of this subset of the facilities 

listed in Tables 1E.2 and 1E.3 on pp. 1.66-67 of the application? Thanks. 

CalPeak Power El Cajon one hour

El Colton three hours

Lambie Energy Center three hours

TID Almond 2 Power Plant one hour

Canyon Power Plant 60 minutes

Starwood Power – Midway one hour

Panoche Energy one hour

San Francisco Electric Reliability Project one hour

Niland Power Plant Unknown—averaging time not indicated in documents on CEC website.

Roger Kohn 

USEPA Region 9 - Air Division (AIR-3) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

415-972-3973 

kohn.roger@epa

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkohn\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web2917.htm 10/6/2011
##### 



ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
GLOBAL STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
  Section 1. Purpose.
  Section 2. Definitions.




---



##### 



Section 3. Administration.
 Power and Authority of the Committee
 2




---



##### 



Meetings of the Committee
 Section 4. Shares Available for Awards.
 Shares Available
 Accounting for Awards
   provided, however
 3




---



##### 



Adjustments provided, however
 Incentive Stock Options
 Section 5. Eligibility.
 provided,
however
 Section 6. Awards.
 Options
 Exercise Price provided, however
 Option Term
 Time and Method of Exercise
 4




---



##### 



Stock Appreciation Rights
 Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
 Restrictions
 (ii) Stock Certificates
 (iii) Forfeiture; Delivery of Shares provided, however
 Limit on Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Awards
 5




---



##### 



Performance Awards
 Dividend Equivalents.
 Limit on Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Awards
 General
 No Cash Consideration for Awards
 Awards May Be Granted Separately or Together
 Forms of Payment Under Awards
 Limits On Transfer of Awards provided, however
 6




---



##### 



provided
  Term of Awards
 Rule 16b-3 Six-Month Limitations
 Restrictions; Securities Exchange Listing
 Award Limitations Under the Plan
 7




---



##### 



Section 7. Amendment and Termination; Adjustments.
  Amendments to the Plan provided, however
    Amendments to Awards
 Prohibition on Option Repricing
 Correction of Defects, Omissions and Inconsistencies
 Section 8. Income Tax Withholding; Tax Bonuses.
 Withholding
 8




---



##### 



Tax Bonuses
 Section 9. General Provisions.
 No Rights to Awards
 Delegation
 Terms of Awards
 No Limit on Other Compensation Arrangements
 No Right to Employment or Directorship
 Governing Law
 Severability
 9




---



##### 



No Trust or Fund Created
 No Fractional Shares
 Headings
 Section 10. Effective Date of the Plan.
  Section 11. Term of the Plan.
  10




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 
   Current
    
    $1.00/share
    
    $2.00/share
    
    $3.00/share
    
    $4.00/share
    
    $5.00/share
    
    $7.50/shareTier
    
    Exercise Price
    
    Exchange Ratio
    
    Exchange Ratio
    
    Exchange Ratio
    
    Exchange Ratio
    
    Exchange Ratio
    
    Exchange Ratio1
    
    $
    4.00 - 5.49
    
    
    
    2.00 to 1
    
    
    
    1.50 to 1
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A2
    
    $
    5.50 - 7.99
    
    
    
    3.00 to 1
    
    
    
    2.00 to 1
    
    
    
    1.75 to 1
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A3
    
    $
    8.00 - 14.99
    
    
    
    6.00 to 1
    
    
    
    3.25 to 1
    
    
    
    2.25 to 1
    
    
    
    2.00 to 1
    
    
    
    1.75 to 1
    
    
    
    N/A4
    
    $15.00 or higher
    
    
    11.25 to 1
    
    
    
    5.50 to 1
    
    
    
    3.75 to 1
    
    
    
    3.00 to 1
    
    
    
    2.75 to 1
    
    
    
    2.00 to 1
    11




---



##### 



12
# All-Purpose Table
§ 95.12 Forms for applying for Federal assistance. ( a ) Applicants shall use the SF-424 series or those forms and instructions prescribed by DOL.
( b ) The applicant shall complete the appropriate sections of the SF-424 (Application for Federal Assistance) indicating whether the application was subject to review by the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC). The name and address of the SPOC for a particular State can be obtained from DOL or the *Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.* The SPOC shall advise the applicant whether the program for which application is made has been selected by that State for review.
§ 95.26 Non-Federal audits. ( a ) Recipients and subrecipients that are institutions of higher education or other non-profit organizations (including hospitals) shall be subject to the audit requirements contained in the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507) and revised OMB Circular A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.”
( b ) State and local governments shall be subject to the audit requirements contained in the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507) and revised OMB Circular A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.”
( c ) For-profit hospitals not covered by the audit provisions of revised OMB Circular A-133 shall be subject to the audit requirements of the Federal awarding agencies.
( d ) Commercial organizations shall be subject to the audit requirements specified by the DOL awarding agency or the prime recipient as incorporated into the award document. See 29 CFR part 96.
[59 FR 38271, July 27, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 45939, 45942, Aug. 29, 1997]