alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Reconnaissance of ground-water resources in the Blue Grass Region, Kentucky

By: W.N. PalmquistFrancis R. Hall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1533

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 780.718 Employees who may be exempt.

Employees employed “by” a country elevator establishment which qualifies for exemption will be exempt, if the “area of production” requirement is met, while they are engaged in any of the customary operations of the establishment which is commonly recognized as a country elevator. Included among such employees are those who are engaged in selling the elevator's goods or services, keeping its books, receiving, handling, and loading out grain, grinding and mixing feed or treating seed for farmers, performing ordinary maintenance and repair of the premises and equipment or engaging in any other work of the establishment which is commonly recognized as part of its operations as a country elevator. An employee employed by such an elevator is not restricted to performing his work inside the establishment. He may also engage in his exempt duties away from the elevator. For example, a salesman who visits farmers on their farms to discuss the storage of their grain in the elevator is performing exempt work while on such visits. It is sufficient that an employee employed by an elevator is, while working away from the establishment, doing the exempt work of the elevator. If the establishment is engaged only in activities commonly recognized as those of a country elevator and none of its employees engaged in any other activities, all the employees employed by the country elevator will come within the exemption if no more than five employees are employed in the establishment in such operations and if the “area of production” requirement is met.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35120-35121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Issuance of Right-of-Way Permit

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Fish and Wildlife 
Service will issue a right-of-way permit to Petroleum Properties 
Corporation for the construction of a 20-inch underground natural gas 
pipeline on lands of the Sutter National Wildlife Refuge in

[[Page 35121]]

Sutter County, California, described as follows: Mount Diablo Meridian, 
Township 14 N, Range 2 E, Section 9. The right-of-way would run about 
0.1 to 0.2 miles south of Hughes Road.

DATES: The permit will be issued within 30 days of June 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Cullen, Division of Realty, 911 
NE 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97232-4181, telephone (503) 231-6201.

    Dated: May 25, 2000.
Carolyn A. Bohan,
Acting Regional Director, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 00-13657 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 534 

Designating the month of May 2008 as ‘‘National Drug Court Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2008 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. KOHL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. JOHNSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the month of May 2008 as ‘‘National Drug 

Court Month’’. 

Whereas drug courts provide focus and leadership for community-wide partnerships, bringing together public safety 

and public health professionals in the fight against drug 

abuse and criminality; 

Whereas 60 percent to 80 percent of drug offenders sentenced to prison and over 40 percent sentenced to probation recidivate, and whereas fewer than 17 percent of 

drug court graduates recidivate; 

Whereas the results of more than 100 program evaluations 

and at least 3 experimental studies have yielded evidence 

that drug courts greatly improve substance abuse treatVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:14 Apr 29, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR534.IS SR534

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 534 IS 

ment outcomes, substantially reduce crime, and produce 

significant societal benefits; 

Whereas drug courts transform over 120,000 addicts each 

year in the adult, juvenile, and family court systems into 

drug-free, productive citizens; 

Whereas judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, substance 

abuse treatment and rehabilitation professionals, law enforcement and community supervision personnel, researchers and educators, national and community leaders, 

and others dedicated to drug courts and similar types of 

treatment programs are healing families and communities 

across the country; and 

Whereas the drug court movement has grown from the 12 

original drug courts in 1994 to over 2,000 operational 

drug courts as of December 2007: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the month of May 2008 as ‘‘Na3 tional Drug Court Month’’; 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 and interested groups to observe the month with ap6 propriate ceremonies and activities; 

7 (3) encourages leaders across the United States 

8 to increase the use of drug courts by instituting sus9 tainable drug courts and other treatment-based al10 ternatives to prison in all 3,143 counties in the 

11 United States, which serve the vast majority of the 

12 highest-need citizens in the justice system; and 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 534 IS 

1 (4) supports the goal of robustly funding the 

2 Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program and other 

3 treatment-based alternatives to prison in order to ex4 pand these critical criminal justice programs. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 501.44 Additional information, if required. Where the ARB has determined to review such decision and order, the ARB will notify each party of: ( a ) The issue or issues raised;
( b ) The form in which submissions must be made (e.g., briefs or oral argument); and
( c ) The time within which such presentation must be submitted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gencor Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ E.J. Elliott                    
|E.J. Elliott                        
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|December 28, 2009                   
|                                    
|/s/ L. Ray Adams                    
|L. Ray Adams                        
|Chief Financial Officer             
|                                    
|December 28, 2009
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

129472 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION Stephen J. Markman, SYSTEM, INC., No minee for Lender Justices COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 129472 COA: 261774 Wayne CC: 04-409673-CH ALLEN FAYAD FAYAD, Defendant,

and

SOUAD FOUAD FAYAD, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 4, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
----

Action brought on 22 July 2004 by José Luis Buendia Sierra against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-311/04)

(2004/C 262/84)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 July 2004 by José Luis Buendia Sierra, residing in Brussels, represented by Marc van der Woude and Valérie Landes, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court of First Instance should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

According to the applicant, the decision to award him only one Directorate-General priority point is due to criteria established in the Legal Service which lead to the award of such points to officials with most seniority in grade, irrespective of their merits. In challenging that decision, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and infringement of Article 2(1) of the general provisions giving effect to Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 6(3) and (4) of the general provisions giving effect to Article 45 of the Staff Regulations. In addition, the applicant maintains that that decision offends against the principle of equal treatment and the principle that officials are to have reasonable career prospects, contains a manifest error of assessment and amounts to improper exercise of authority. Finally, he alleges breach of essential procedural requirements in the procedure for the award of points and considering the informal appeal.

Moreover, the applicant claims that the decision not to award him any ‘Promotion Committee for additional activity in the interests of the institution’ special priority points for the 2003 promotion year is contrary to Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, Article 9 of the general provisions giving effect to Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and the principle of equal treatment. In his view, that decision is also vitiated by a manifest error of assessment and misuse of power.

Finally, the applicant challenges the decision to award him a total of 20 points, the list of merit of Grade A5 officials, the list of officials promoted to Grade A4 and the decision not to enter his name in those lists. In this connection, the applicant alleges, first of all, that the other acts challenged in this action are unlawful and also that the rules governing staff appraisal for the period 2001-2002, the general provisions giving effect to Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and the general provisions giving effect to Article 45 of the Staff Regulations are unlawful. In his view, those provisions offend against Articles 25(2) and 45 of the Staff Regulations, the principle that officials are to have reasonable career prospects and the principle of equal treatment. Last, the applicant claims that those decisions are vitiated by lack of competence and breaches of essential procedural requirements.

----
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  
  I,
Russell K. Girling, Chief Executive Officer of TC PipeLines GP, Inc., the
general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the Partnership), in compliance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 hereby certify,to the best of my
knowledge, in connection
with the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) on the date hereof, that:
 
 ·
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  ·
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.
  
 Dated:  November
3,
2008                                                                   /s/ Russell K.
Girling
 Russell K. Girling
 Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
 TC
PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner of
 TC PipeLines, LP (Principal Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip navigation
  ADA HomeADA HistoryPart One: Origins of the ADAPart Two: Crafting the LawPart Three: The ADA Becomes LawAchieving the PromiseTools and TechHealth CareLearn, Work and PlayReal People
 Home
          ADA
          Lydia X. Z. Brown Lydia X. Z. Brown
 Lydia X. Z. Brown is an advocate, organizer, educator, strategist, and attorney. They are working for disability rights and disability justice on many fronts. In this interview, Lydia cites the ADA as an important milestone in that fight. They note the ADA includes values and standards that can lead to freedom, access, justice, and community integration for all people. Lydia wants young people with disabilities to know they deserve full access to community and belonging.

                    *Last modified on 08/18/2020* Lydia X. Z. BrownLydia X. Z. Brown
 Back to Top    More on the ADA
  

        
      ACL's 31st Anniversary of the ADA page
                      ADA.gov
                      ADA National Network
                      #ThanksToTheADA campaignSITE SUPPORT
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Contact Us
                      Disclaimers
                      Freedom of Information Act
                      Privacy policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers and PlayersRELATED SITES
  

        
      Administration for Community Living
                      HHS Office for Civil Rights
                      Department of Health and Human Services
                      CMS: Access to Care
                      No Fear Act (on HHS.gov)
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      White House
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

793 

CA 13-00403 

PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF GERALD BROCKINGTON, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (ZAINAB A. CHAUDHRY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark

H. Dadd, A.J.), entered January 23, 2013 in a CPLR article 78

proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging the denial of his application for release to parole

supervision in June 2011. The Attorney General has advised this Court

that, subsequent to that denial and during the pendency of this

appeal, petitioner reappeared before the Board of Parole in June 2013

and was again denied release. Consequently, this appeal must be

dismissed as moot (see Matter of Sanchez v Evans, 111 AD3d 1315, 1315;

Matter of Robles v Evans, 100 AD3d 1455, 1455). Contrary to

petitioner’s contention, the exception to the mootness doctrine does

not apply (see Sanchez, 111 AD3d at 1315; see generally Matter of

Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). 

Entered: July 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lite King Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: February 23, 2006                 By:
                                                 --------------
                                        Name:    David L.Norris
                                        Title:   President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lite King Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Chapter # Title of Chapter	

Chapter # Title of Chapter	

**To**:	contact name	Mathematica

**From**:	

**Date**:	March 24, 2021

**Page**:	1

**Appendix CStudy Endorsement Example**

**This page has been left blank for double-sided copying.**

Dear AAA Director:

The Administration for Community Living has funded an exciting initiative to learn more about how the Aging Network collaborates to improve the lives of older adults, and how it determines the effectiveness of these efforts. We are asking every AAA to contribute just a few minutes to this project.

**What are we asking you to do?**

Simply to take a brief, 10-minute survey by DATE.

**You will receive an email directly from NAME at EMAIL on DATE, with a link to the survey.**

Your responses will be aggregated with other AAAs and used to better understand the Aging Network. *Individual survey responses will not be made public and the information you provide will not be shared without your explicit consent.*

If you have questions about the ACL grant that supports development of this survey, please contact n4a’s Traci Wilson at twilson@n4a.org.

We recognize that all of you are very busy, so thank you in advance for taking the time to complete this important survey.

Sincerely,

---insert signature image here---

Sandy Markwood 

Chief Executive Officer

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 150/5210-7E - 150/5210-7E, Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Communications

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5210-7E
- Title
- 150/5210-7E, Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Communications
- Status
- Active
- Date issued
- 2024-03-26
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-300, Office of Airport Safety and Operations - Airport Safety & Operations Division 
- Description
-  This AC provides guidance to assist airport operators in preparing for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) communications. 
- Content
-    -  150/5210-7E  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Rowan Services, LLC and Rowan Companies, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-22-00433-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-00964

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

On June 8, 2022, relators, Rowan Services, LLC and Rowan Companies, Inc., filed 

a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s May 18, 2022 order granting 

real party in interest, Stephen Fortune’s, motion to compel discovery responses. Relators 

argue that the trial court abused its discretion by compelling relators “to produce data from 

a non-party/third party entity,” and request that this Court direct the trial court to vacate its 

May 18, 2022 order. 

Also on June 8, 2022, relators filed a “Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief,” 

requesting that this Court grant the emergency motion and “stay[] the trial court’s 18 May

2022 Order ordering [r]elators to produce data on behalf of a non-third/party entities.” 

Pursuant to the trial court’s May 18, 2022 order, relators were required to “provide the 

non-party/third party entities’ data within twenty (20) days of the Order, which [wa]s 7 

June 2022.”

Relators’ motion for temporary relief is denied.

We further request a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real 

party in interest. The response(s), if any, is due to be filed with this Court no later than 

twenty days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ April Farris

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 10, 2022