alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7595

LEONARD CARTER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; JAMES S. GILMORE,

III, Former Attorney General; ANDREW J.

WINSTON, Chairman State Board of Corrections;

RANDALL G. JOHNSON, Judge; A. D. ROBINSON,

Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center; KEITH W.

DAVIS, Warden Programs, Nottoway Correctional

Center; AVIS BRANCH, Mailroom Clerk, Nottoway

Correctional Center; G. SEYMOUR, Sergeant Investigator, Nottoway Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-97-948)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
* The order from which Carter appeals was filed on October 9,

1998, and entered on the district court’s docket sheet on October

13, 1998, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Carter, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Carter v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No.

CA-97-948 (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1998).* We deny Carter’s motions for

a jury trial, for execution, and both his motions for production of

documents. We also dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.420 Right to appeal. ( a ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken by a COTP under this subchapter, may appeal that action or decision to the cognizant District Commander according to the procedures in 46 CFR 1.03-15.
( b ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken by a District Commander, whether made under this subchapter generally or pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, with the exception of those decisions made under § 101.410 of this subpart, may appeal that decision or action to the Commandant (CG-5P), according to the procedures in 46 CFR 1.03-15. Appeals of District Commander decisions or actions made under § 101.410 of this subpart should be made to the Commandant (CG-CVC), according to the procedures in 46 CFR 1.03-15.
( c ) Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, under this subchapter, may appeal that action or decision to the Commandant (CG-5P) according to the procedures in 46 CFR 1.03-15.
( d ) Decisions made by Commandant (CG-5P), whether made under this subchapter generally or pursuant to the appeal provisions of this section, are considered final agency action.
[USCG-2003-14792, 68 FR 39278, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60472, Oct. 22, 2003; 68 FR 62502, Nov. 4, 2003; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39173, July 1, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State compact. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. § 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish, in the                         **Federal Register**                        , notice of approved                               ( print page 34727)                            Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved Amendment VI to the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon and the State of Oregon Gaming Compact, which was executed on March 31, 2000.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective May 31, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: May 17, 2000.

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 00-13497 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
### FI LED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT J anu ary 18, 20 06 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 04- 1427 9

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 04-01428 CV -T -23-MSS KENNET H LEBLING, Pe tit ion er -Appe llant,
ve rs us SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORREC TIONS, ATTORNEYGENERAL OF FLORIDA, Respondent -Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of F lor ida

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (J an ua ry 18, 200 6) Be fo re E D MO N D SO N , Ch ie f Judg e, A N D E RS O N a nd F A Y , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: Appellant filed a petition for a w rit of habeas corpus pursuant to 2 8 U. S. C. §225 4. T he dis tr ic t c ourt r ev ie w ed the pe tit iona nd c onc lud ed : “ L eb lin g r ep re se nts2

on p ag e thr ee in his pe tit iontha t he ha d r e- subm itt ed am oti on f

or pos t- co nvi ct ion
re lie f to the sta te c ourts, w hic h is sti ll pe ndi ng. C onse que ntl y , thi s a ct ionis prem ature. ” T he district court then sua sp onte dism issed the petiti on as prem ature. A c om pa ri son of

the c la im s r ai se d inthe §22 54 p et iti on and the the n pe ndi ng state court m otion dem onstrates that tho se claim s raised in the §225 4 petitio n are
no t i nv ol ve d o r in cl ud edin th e cl ai m s ra is edin th e st at e co ur t m at te r. Co nse que ntl y , a s th e gove rn m en t c onc ed es , it is ap pa re nt n owtha t the c la im s in Le bling ’ s §225 4 petitio n wer e fully exhausted and ripe for review
. The dism issal
wa s a result of a m isund erstanding and error. T he gov er

nm en t ur ge s othe r gr ound s f or our a ff irm an ce of

the dis m iss al a nd now suggests further discovery is necessary

to determ ine if the petition is barre d for being successive. A ll of these argum ents sho uld be presented to th e district court in the first instance. The order of dism issal is vacated and the m atter r em anded to the dis trict
co urt f or f urthe r co nsi de ra tio n. VACATED and REMANDED.
#### § 780.609 Workweek unit in applying the exemption.

The unit of time to be used in determining the application of the exemption to an employee is the workweek. (See *Overnight Transportation Co.* v. *Missel,* 316 U.S. 572.) A workweek is a fixed and regularly recurring interval of seven consecutive 24-hour periods. It may begin at any hour of any day set by the employer and need not coincide with the calendar week. Once the workweek has been set it commences each succeeding week on the same day and at the same hour. Changing of the workweek for the purpose of escaping the requirements of the Act is not permitted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. NJ11-14-000]

Take notice that on July 7, 2011, Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC submitted tariff filing per 35.25(e): baseline filing to be effective 7/6/2011, pursuant to Order 714.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 29, 2011.                

Dated: August 8, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-20549 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Heart Health for Women
 

You may think heart disease only affects men. This is not true. Heart disease is the leading
 

cause of death for women. FDA has tips to help you make good decisions about your heart.
 

Eat a Heart Healthy Diet. 

The nutrition facts on the food label can help you 

make healthy food choices. 

• Choose foods that are ‘low salt’ or ‘low sodium.’ 

• Limit foods that have ‘trans fat.’ Too much trans fat 

can cause heart attacks. 

• Cut back on sugar. Sugar is also labeled as ‘glucose,’ 

‘fructose,’ ‘sucrose,’ and ‘corn syrup.’ 

Manage Your Health Conditions. 

Common health problems like high blood 

pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol can 

increase your risk of heart disease. 

• Take your medicines as directed. Do not stop taking 

your medicines until your doctor says that it is OK. 

• If you have diabetes, check your blood sugar level. 

• Get your blood pressure and cholesterol tested. 

• Ask your doctor how you should manage 

your health conditions during pregnancy. 

• Some women need a device to help their heart work. 

Talk to your doctor about the device that is best 

for your heart problem. 

FDA Office of Women’s Health • www.fda.gov/womenshearthealth 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heart Health for Women 

Continued 

Get the Facts About Aspirin. 

Daily use of aspirin to prevent heart attacks or 

a stroke is not right for everyone. 

• Ask your healthcare provider if you should use aspirin.

• If aspirin is right for you, find out:

‐How much you should take.
 

‐How often you should take it.
 

‐How long you should take aspirin. Some products combine
 

aspirin with other ingredients and are not meant for 

long‐term use. 

• Tell your healthcare provider about all of the medicines

and supplements you take. Your risk of bleeding may

be higher if you use aspirin while also taking certain

medicines, vitamins, or herbs.

Know the Signs of a Heart Attack. 

The signs of a heart attack can be different for women 

than they are for men. 

• Heavy ache in your chest or back between your

shoulder blades

• Sharp pain in your upper body

• Shortness of breath

• Breaking out in a cold sweat

• Unusual or unexplained tiredness

• Feeling dizzy or light‐headed

• Feeling sick to your stomach

This fact sheet was developed by the FDA Office of Women’s Health. 

To learn more about heart health for women, go to the FDA website: 

www.fda.gov/womenshearthealth 

2017
#### §§ 100.950-100.1099 [Reserved]
Searched for **https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/pages/smallbook.aspx**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/pages/smallbook.aspx**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SEC. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection withthe filing by Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Barry M. Portnoy |   | /s/ David J. Hegarty                  |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Barry M. Portnoy     |   | David J. Hegarty                      |   |
| Managing Truste      |   | President and Chief Operating Officer |   |
|                 |   |                                  |   |
|                 |   |                                  |   |
| /s/ Gerard M. Martin |   | /s/ John R. Hoadley                   |   |
| Gerard M. Martin     |   | John R. Hoadley                       |   |
| Managing Trustee     |   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
PUBLIC LAW 115–283—DEC. 6, 2018 132 STAT. 4367 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 606: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Sept. 13, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–283 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1025 Nevin 

Avenue in Richmond, California, as the ‘‘Harold D. McCraw, Sr., Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HAROLD D. MCCRAW, SR., POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1025 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harold D. McCraw, Sr., 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Harold D. McCraw, Sr., Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 6, 2018. 

Dec. 6, 2018 

[H.R. 606]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7687

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES LEE DOVEL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-74-B, CA-96-1739-B) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 1, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Lee Dovel, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Lee Dovel appeals the district court's order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), hismotion to withdraw his guilty plea, and motion to correct his sentence. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss.Dovel pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994) and to carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994). He alleges that the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (Nos. 94-7448, 94-7492), invalidates his § 924(c) conviction, plea and sentence. Bailey provides no relief for Dovel because the decision did not analyze the factual basis needed to support a § 924(c) conviction for "carrying" a firearm. Id. at 4042-43. The record reveals that Dovel sold cocaine to a government agent while sitting in his automobile and that Dovel reached into the back seat of hisvehicle and pointed a rifle at the agent. We find these facts sufficient to uphold Dovel's § 924(c) conviction for a carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense. See United States v. Mitchell , 104 F.3d 649, 653 (4th Cir. 1997). Thus, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Preliminary Regulatory Determinations 3 – Strontium References
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Mark IV Industries, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                           2,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,000
<INVENTORY>                                    346,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               901,300
<PP&E>                                         883,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 278,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,043,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          508,200
<BONDS>                                        796,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                     476,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,043,100
<SALES>                                      1,993,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,993,700
<CGS>                                        1,363,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,806,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                133,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,500
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    900
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73



</TABLE>