alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. OA00-4-002]

                    Take notice that on May 1, 2000, Indianapolis Power & Light Company (Indianapolis) submitted revised standards of conduct in response to the Commission's February 24, 2000 Order.[1] 

Indianapolis states that it served copies of the filing to all parties on the service list, to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and others on the official service list in this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 5, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of Indianapolis's filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             90 FERC ¶ 61,174 (2000).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-13107  Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 23.1




Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Arrow-Magnolia International, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-47709 and 333-01511) on Form S-8 of our report dated February 6,
1998, relating to statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
of
Arrow-Magnolia International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Arrow-
Magnolia, International, Inc.




							KPMG LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2000
**Exhibit 10.1****MOBILITY ELECTRONICS, INC.****2006 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN****Summary**     Mobility Electronics, Inc.’s Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is a discretionary cashincentive program designed to motivate participants to achieve the company’s financial and otherperformance objectives and to reward them for their achievements when those objectives are met.**Eligibility**     Participants are approved solely at the discretion of the Compensation and Human ResourcesCommittee of Mobility Electronics, Inc.’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”). No personis automatically entitled to participate in the Plan in any year, and any eligible participant maychoose not to participate in the Plan in any year for any reason.**Administration**     The Committee is ultimately responsible for administering the Plan. The Committee has allpowers and discretion necessary or appropriate to review and approve the Plan and its operation,including, but not limited to, the power to (a) determine which eligible participants shall begranted bonus awards, (b) prescribe the terms and conditions of bonus awards, (c) interpret thePlan, (d) adopt rules for the administration, interpretation and application of the Plan as areconsistent therewith, and (e) interpret, amend or revoke any such rules. All determinations anddecisions made by the Committee and any delegate of the Committee shall be final, conclusive, andbinding on all persons, and shall be given the maximum deference permitted by law. The Committee,in its sole discretion and on such terms and conditions as it may provide, may delegate all or partof its authority and powers under the Plan to one or more directors, officers and/or managers ofthe Company. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may amend or terminate the Plan, or any partthereof, at any time and for any reason.**Award Determination**     The Committee, in its sole discretion, will approve target bonuses for each participant.Bonuses will be calculated using a formula that includes: (a) the executive’s salary, (b) theexecutive’s target bonus, and (c) such other discretionary factors as the Committee determinesappropriate given the performance of the Company, and the participant’s contribution to theCompany’s overall performance, including, without limitation, the growth and creation of increasedstockholder value through the efficient use of Company assets.**Award Payouts**     Unlessotherwise determined by the Committee, bonuses will be paid on an annual basis,typically in February, and the bonus period is currently the fiscal year period.
 

 
**MOBILITY ELECTRONICS**
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KENTREIA MICHELLE RUSSELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1307

August 30, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Clara V. Murga, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and CASANEUVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Program Instructions

AOA-PI-01-06 - July 16, 2001

TO: STATE AND AREA AGENCIES ON AGING ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER THE OLDER AMERICANS 

ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED

SUBJECT: Reallotment Procedure for 2001 OAA TITLE III and Title VII Formula Grant Fund

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES: Section 304(b) of the Older Americans Act, as Amended

The purpose of this Program Instruction is to notify state agencies on aging that, by August 17, 2001, 

they must provide to the Administration on Aging (AoA): 

1) the amount, if any, of FY 2001 Title III and/or Title VII funds the state will not use by September 

30, 2001, and is releasing for reallotment; and, 

2) the request for additional Title III and/or Title VII funds, if any, which could be obligated by the 

state agency by the end of Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2002, i.e., September 30, 2002. 

Deadline for Obligation of Funds 

We would like to remind you that funds must be obligated by a State during the Federal fiscal year for 

which they were appropriated; i.e., funds may not be obligated after September 30, 2001. In addition 

we would like you to inform Area Agencies on Aging and the service providers of their responsibility to 

liquidate obligated funds within two fiscal years after the fiscal year for which these funds were 

awarded, i.e., this provides a total of three years for liquidation of Federal funds appropriated during a 

given fiscal year. 

Realloted funds are available for obligation by state agencies during the fiscal year following the fiscal 

year for which funds were appropriated. In other words, if a state receives reallotted FY 2001 funds, it 

must obligate those funds not later than September 30, 2002. 

Release of Unused Funds 

State agencies not intending to use the full amount of their Title III or Title VII allotments must 

submit a statement signed by the authorized state agency official releasing Title III and/or Title VII 

funds for reallotment. This statement must identify from which part (B, C1, C2, D or E) the funds are 

being released. If a state releases funds for reallotment, AoA will issue a revised Grant Award 

reflecting the decrease. 

Request for Funds 
If additional funds can be utilized, state agencies should submit a brief statement justifying the need 

for additional funds signed by the appropriate state agency official. The statement must identify the 

Parts of Title III and/or VII for which funds are being requested. 

States must submit an original and one copy of their requests to their AoA Regional Administrator by 

August 17, 2001. States are reminded that realloted funds are one-time awards and that there is no 

assurance that the state will receive additional realloted funds in future years. Also, realloted funds do 

not affect a state's allocation of funds in future years. 

DUE DATES: August 17, 2001, for submission to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS Regional 

Offices. 

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS Regional 

Offices. 

Norman L. Thompson

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant

Secretary for Aging
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 200 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 200

    Commending Louisiana jockeys for their continued success in the 
                   Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2007

   Mr. Vitter (for himself and Ms. Landrieu) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Commending Louisiana jockeys for their continued success in the 
                   Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs.

Whereas jockey Calvin Borel successfully won the 133rd running of the Kentucky 
        Derby at Churchill Downs on May 5, 2007;
Whereas Calvin Borel rallied Street Sense from 19th place to pass the 
        pacesetting Hard Spun in the stretch and draw away to a 2\1/4\-length 
        victory;
Whereas the victory was Calvin Borel's first in the Kentucky Derby;
Whereas Calvin Borel was born on November 7, 1966, in St. Martinsville, 
        Louisiana;
Whereas Calvin Borel hails from South Louisiana, the heart of Cajun Country, 
        famous for its production of many top jockeys during the last 20 years; 
        and
Whereas Calvin Borel's victory in the 133rd running of the Kentucky Derby 
        solidifies his place in a tradition of Louisiana jockeys who have won 
        the Kentucky Derby, such as Eric Guerin (1947), Edward Delahoussaye 
        (1982, 1983), Craig Perret (1990), and Kent Desormeaux (1998, 2000): 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends Louisiana jockeys for their continued success 
        at one of America's most heralded thoroughbred horseracing 
        events, the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs;
            (2) recognizes jockey Calvin Borel for winning the 133rd 
        running of the Kentucky Derby on May 5, 2007;
            (3) recognizes the achievements of all the owners, 
        trainers, and support staff who were instrumental in helping 
        Calvin Borel and Street Sense to victory; and
            (4) recognizes the achievements of all current and former 
        Louisiana jockeys in the Kentucky Derby.
                                 <all>
```
*Title:*                     April 2000 Current Population Survey Supplement on Child Support.                

*OMB No.:*                     0992-0003.                

*Description:*                     Collection of these data will assist legislators and policymakers in determining how effective their policymaking efforts have been over time in applying the various child support legislation to the overall child support enforcement picture. This information will help policymakers determine to what extent individuals on welfare would be removed from the welfare rolls as a result of more stringent child support enforcement efforts.                

*Respondents:*                     Individuals and Households.                

*Annual Burden Estimates:*

In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and comments may be forwarded by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection.

The Department specifically requests comments on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) the quality, utility, the clarity of information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of the information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted within 60 days of this publication.

Dated: January 13, 2000.

Bob Sargis,

Acting Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-1322 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am]

                BILLING CODE 4184-01-M                Start Printed Page 3242
EXHIBIT 10(ii)

DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



Agreement made on December 19, 2002 between Value Invest, Ltd. with offices located at Letzigraben 89, 8040 Zurich, Switzerland, referred to as Creditor and Sona Development Corp. with offices located at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.



SECTION ONE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATION



The parties acknowledge that Debtor is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $157,115.85 as the result of loans extended by Creditor in 2000.



SECTION TWO
AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT METHOD OF PAYMENT



Debtor and Creditor desire and agree, to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms an provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment for same contained in the original loan obligation as described in Section One above.



SECTION THREE
CONSIDERATION



In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:



|a. | Method of Payment:Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in Section One, above, 1,571,159 shares of Debtor's common stock, valued at $0.10 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of loans provided by Creditor to Debtor.      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Creditor's board of directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 1,571,159 shares of Debtor's common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.



In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.



Sona Development Corp.



/s/ Nora CoccaroBy: Nora Coccaro, President



Value Invest, Ltd.

Giovanni TrivellaBy: Giovanni Trivella, President

- 21 -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MICHELE RENAE HUNTER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 598 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
**Exhibit
      24.1**





**McMoRan
      Exploration Co.**





**Secretary’s
      Certificate**





I,
      Douglas N. Currault II, Assistant Secretary of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the
      “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
      of Delaware, do hereby certify that the following resolution was duly adopted
      by
      the Sole Director of the Corporation by written consent on November 12, 1998,
      and that such resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded and is
      in
      full force and effect on the date hereof:





RESOLVED,
      That any report, registration statement or other form filed on behalf of this
      corporation pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934,
      or any amendment to any such report, registration statement or other form,
      may
      be signed on behalf of any director or officer of this corporation pursuant
      to a
      power of attorney executed by such director or officer.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the seal of the
      Corporation on March 15, 2007.

















/s/
      Douglas N. Currault II


Douglas
      N. Currault II


Assistant
      Secretary


Seal
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

 

I, Yanlin Han, certify that:  

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.            The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

|   | b) | Omitted |
|--------|----|---------|

 

c)            Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.            The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)            All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: :  November 13, 2006

___/s/ Yanlin Han__________

Yanlin Han, 

Chief Executive Officer
9/3/2009

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII

Alabama $256,575 $78,989 $335,564

Alaska $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Arizona $334,558 $102,997 $437,555

Arkansas $162,447 $50,011 $212,458

California $1,650,561 $508,140 $2,158,701

Colorado $212,503 $65,421 $277,924

Connecticut $194,435 $59,907 $254,342

Delaware $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

District of Columbia $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Florida $1,213,801 $373,679 $1,587,480

Georgia $407,457 $125,439 $532,896

Hawaii $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Idaho $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Illinois $633,272 $197,384 $830,656

Indiana $326,737 $100,589 $427,326

Iowa $173,657 $55,927 $229,584

Kansas $145,307 $45,843 $191,150

Kentucky $227,748 $70,114 $297,862

Louisiana $215,841 $68,518 $284,359

Maine $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Maryland $278,337 $85,688 $364,025

Massachusetts $351,790 $109,606 $461,396

Michigan $529,654 $163,059 $692,713

Minnesota $261,150 $80,397 $341,547

Mississippi $149,593 $46,053 $195,646

Missouri $321,998 $99,130 $421,128

Montana $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Nebraska $94,444 $29,770 $124,214

Nevada $123,705 $38,084 $161,789

New Hampshire $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

New Jersey $465,457 $143,950 $609,407

New Mexico $101,021 $31,100 $132,121

New York $1,039,826 $320,120 $1,359,946

North Carolina $465,026 $143,162 $608,188

North Dakota $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Ohio $627,247 $197,185 $824,432

Oklahoma $196,597 $60,524 $257,121

Oregon $204,816 $63,054 $267,870

Pennsylvania $753,411 $242,944 $996,355

Rhode Island $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

South Carolina $241,319 $74,292 $315,611

South Dakota $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Tennessee $331,253 $101,979 $433,232

Texas $1,005,614 $309,587 $1,315,201

Utah $96,699 $29,769 $126,468

Vermont $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

Virginia $383,892 $118,184 $502,076

Washington $322,492 $99,282 $421,774

West Virginia $114,224 $36,736 $150,960

Wisconsin $299,344 $92,156 $391,500

Wyoming $81,457 $25,225 $106,682

American Samoa $10,182 $3,153 $13,335

Guam $40,729 $12,612 $53,341

Northern Mariana Islands $10,182 $3,153 $13,335

Puerto Rico $216,895 $66,773 $283,668

Virgin Islands $40,729 $12,612 $53,341

TOTAL $16,291,466 $5,044,997 $21,336,463

Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2009 Final Allocation
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0378 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RALPH DEAVILA ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 31 , 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 29 2022

09/29/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0378