alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Mobility Electronics, Inc. (the Company), each certifies that, to
his or her knowledge on the date of this certification: 1.      The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. May 10, 2004
    
    /s/ Charles R. MolloCharles R. MolloPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Joan W. BrubacherJoan W. BrubacherChief Financial Officer
 - 26 -
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 2 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 2

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 96.42 Audit standards.

Surveys, audits, and examinations will conform to the Government auditing standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and guides issued by the Secretary. For purposes of meeting audit requirements under subparts A and C, only the standards for financial and compliance audits need apply.
#### § 801.73 Final decision of the Secretary.

The Secretary's final Decision and Order shall be served upon all parties and the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.1055 Skagit River.

The draws of all bridges across the Skagit river need not be opened for the passage of vessels. However, the draws shall be returned to operable condition within one year after notification by the District Commander to do so.
#### § 110.50d Mystic Harbor, Noank, Conn.

The area comprises that portion of the harbor off the easterly side of Morgan Point beginning at a point at latitude 41°19′15′′, longitude 71°59′13.5′′; thence to latitude 41°19′15′′, longitude 71°59′00′′; thence to latitude 41°19′02.5′′, longitude 71°59′00′′; thence to latitude 41°19′06′′, longitude 71°59′13.5′′; and thence to the point of beginning.

[CGFR 68-3, 33 FR 4738, Mar. 20, 1968, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
#### In the Matter of Nora Z. Ramos, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Respondent.

Submitted September 9, 1996;

decided October 17, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see,*CPLR 5513, 5514 [a]).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 457 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 457

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of the Chinese New 
                        Year or Spring Festival.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2008

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of the Chinese New 
                        Year or Spring Festival.

Whereas the Chinese New Year is celebrated on the second new moon following the 
        winter solstice;
Whereas February 7, 2008, marks the first day of the Chinese New Year for 2008, 
        also known as the Year of the Rat or the Year of Wu Zi;
Whereas the Chinese New Year festivities begin on the first day of the first 
        lunar month and end 15 days later with the celebration of the Lantern 
        Festival;
Whereas there are approximately 3,500,000 Chinese-Americans in the United 
        States, many of whom will be commemorating this important occasion;
Whereas this day will be marked by celebrations throughout our country as 
        Chinese-Americans gather to watch the dragon and lion dances; and
Whereas the United States Postal Service will debut a new stamp series for the 
        12 animals in the Chinese calendar on February 9, 2008, with the series 
        continuing through 2019: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the cultural and historical significance of 
        the Chinese New Year or Spring Festival;
            (2) in observance of the Chinese New Year, expresses its 
        deepest respect for Chinese-Americans and all those throughout 
        the world who will be celebrating this significant occasion; 
        and
            (3) wishes Chinese-Americans and all those who observe this 
        holiday a happy and prosperous new year.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 4417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JULIO ALBERTO JIMENEZ

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cr - 00124

- LO

- 1 )

Submitted : January 31, 2020 Decided: February 6, 2020

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Geremy C. Kamens, Federal Public Defender, Patrick L. Bryant, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Daniel Cooke, Ass istant United States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Julio A lberto Jimenez

- Garcia appeals the 18

- month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to illegally reentering the United States after deportation or removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) (2018). Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concludi ng that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. Counsel questions, however, whether the district court imposed a reasonable sentence

. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
“We review a sentence for reasonableness ‘under a deferential abuse

- of

- di scretion standard

. ’” United States v. McCoy , 804 F.3d 349, 351 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007)). The district court specifically addressed each of Jimenez

- Garcia’s nonfrivolous sentencing arguments, as well as the s eriousness of his criminal history and the need for deterrence. Furthermore, the court did not plainly err in imposing a term of supervised release, based on its conclusions that the circumstances of the offense merited special deterrence and protection. Although the court’s discussion was brief, “the context of its explanation made [its conclusions] patently obvious.” United
States v. Montes

- Pineda , 445 F.3d 375, 38 1 (4th Cir. 2006); see United States v. Blue , 877 F.3d 513, 520

- 21 (4th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we conclude that Jimenez

- Garcia’s sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious ground s for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment

. This court requires that counsel inform Jimenez

- Garcia, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Jimenez

- Garcia requests that3 a pe tition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Jimenez

- Garcia. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
132 STAT. 4166 PUBLIC LAW 115–276—NOV. 3, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3834: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Sept. 26, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–276 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To provide that members of public safety agencies who died of 9/11-related health 

conditions are eligible for the Presidential 9/11 Heroes Medal of Valor, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘9/11 Heroes Medal of Valor 

Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. MEMBERS OF PUBLIC SAFETY AGENCIES WHO SUBSEQUENTLY 

DIED OF 9/11-RELATED HEALTH CONDITIONS ELIGIBLE FOR 

PRESIDENTIAL 9/11 HEROES MEDAL OF VALOR. 

An individual who was a public safety officer (as defined in 

section 5 of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Act of 2001) 

who— 

(1) participated in the response at any point during the 

period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on July 

31, 2002, to the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, 

the terrorist attack on the Pentagon, or the terrorist attack 

that resulted in the crash of the fourth airplane in Pennsylvania; and 

(2) died as a result of such participation thereafter as 

a result of a WTC-related health condition (which term shall 

have the meaning given such term in section 3312 of the 

Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300mm–22) with respect 

to a WTC responder), 

shall be eligible for the 9/11 Heroes Medal of Valor referred to 

in subsection (a) of section 124 of the Consolidated Appropriations 

Act, 2005, in the same manner and to the same extent as any 

individual who is otherwise eligible under such section, except 

that no requirement under such section pertaining to the death 

of that individual shall apply. 

Approved November 3, 2018. 

9/11 Heroes 

Medal of Valor 

Act of 2017. 

31 USC 5111 

note. 

Nov. 3, 2018 

[H.R. 3834] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
#### § 780.907 “Fruits or vegetables.”

The exempt operations of preparing for transportation and transporting must be performed with respect to “fruits or vegetables.” The intent of section 13(b)(16) is to exempt such operations on fruits or vegetables which are “just-harvested” and still in their raw and natural state. As explained at the time of adoption of the amendment on the floor of the House, the exemption was intended to eliminate the difference in treatment of farmers and nonfarmers with respect to exemption of such “handling or hauling of fruit or vegetables in their raw or natural state.” (See 107 Cong. Rec. (daily ed.) p. 4523.) Transporting and preparing for transportation other farm products which are not fruits or vegetables are not exempt under section 13(b)(16). For example, operations on livestock, eggs, tobacco, or poultry are nonexempt. Sugarcane is not a fruit or vegetable for purposes of this exemption (*Wirtz* v. *Osceola Farms Co.,* 372 F. 2d 584).
#### § 783.40 “Documented” vessel.

A vessel “documented * * * under the laws of the United States” is typically a vessel which has been registered, enrolled and licensed, or licensed by the Bureau of Customs under the laws of the United States (46 U.S.C. 11, 193, 251-252, 258, 840). Although Bureau of Customs regulations provide for three types of documentations, distinctions between the categories of vessels subject to them are immaterial for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act, since a vessel with any of the three kinds of documentation is an “American vessel” within the section 3(p) definition. Generally, any vessel of five net tons or more which is owned by a citizen of the United States is “entitled to” documentation. Complete information on the documentation requirements may be found in 19 CFR part 3.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in or in Relation to Côte d'Ivoire 

On February 7, 2006, by Executive Order 13396, the President declared a national emergency, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire and ordered related measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to the conflict in Côte d'Ivoire. The situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire, which has been addressed by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 1572 of November 15, 2004, and subsequent resolutions, has resulted in the massacre of large numbers of civilians, widespread human rights abuses, significant political violence and unrest, and fatal attacks against international peacekeeping forces. Because the situation in or in relation to Côte d'Ivoire continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on February 7, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond February 7, 2011. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13396.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2011-2063

Billing code 3195-W1-P
§ 110.31 Hull Bay and Allerton Harbor at Hull, Mass. ( a ) *Area No. 1 in Allerton Harbor.* That area north of Hog Island beginning at latitude 42°18′15′′, longitude 70°53′46′′; thence due east to latitude 42°18′15′′, longitude 70°53′29.5′′; thence due south to latitude 42°18′07.5′′, longitude 70°53′29.5′′; thence due west to latitude 42°18′07.5′′, longitude 70°53′46′′; thence due north to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area No. 2 in Hull Bay.* That area south of Hog Island beginning at latitude 42°17′50.5′′, longitude 70°54′07′′; thence due east to latitude 42°17′50.5′′, longitude 70°53′29.5′′; thence due south to latitude 42°17′30′′, longitude 70°53′29.5′′; thence due west to latitude 42°17′30′′, longitude 70°54′07′′; thence due north to the point of beginning.
( c ) *Area No. 3 in Hull Bay.* That area north of Bumkin Island beginning at latitude 42°17′22′′, longitude 70°54′07′′; thence due east to latitude 42°17′22′′, longitude 70°53′17.5′′; thence due south to latitude 42°17′01′′, longitude 70°53′17.5′′; thence due west to latitude 42°17′01′′, longitude 70°54′07′′; thence due north to the point of beginning.
[CGFR 68-160, 34 FR 392, Jan. 10, 1969; 34 FR 939, Jan. 22, 1969, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
#### § 780.120 Raising of “livestock.”

The meaning of the term “livestock” as used in section 3(f) is confined to the ordinary use of the word and includes only domestic animals ordinarily raised or used on farms. That Congress did not use this term in its generic sense is supported by the specific enumeration of activities, such as the raising of fur-bearing animals, which would be included in the generic meaning of the word. The term includes the following animals, among others: Cattle (both dairy and beef cattle), sheep, swine, horses, mules, donkeys, and goats. It does not include such animals as albino and other rats, mice, guinea pigs, and hamsters, which are ordinarily used by laboratories for research purposes (*Mitchell* v. *Maxfield,* 12 WH Cases 792 (S.D. Ohio), 29 Labor Cases 68, 781). Fish are not “livestock” (*Dunkly* v. *Erich,* 158 F. 2d 1), but employees employed in propagating or farming of fish may qualify for exemption under section 13(a)(6) or 13(b)(12) of the Act as stated in § 780.109 as well as under section 13(a)(5), as explained in part 784 of this chapter.
State

Elder Abuse 

Prevention Ombudsman Total

Alabama $80,483 $222,325 $302,808

Alaska $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Arizona $96,386 $266,258 $362,644

Arkansas $51,101 $141,160 $192,261

California $512,653 $1,416,144 $1,928,797

Colorado $61,297 $169,325 $230,622

Connecticut $63,137 $174,409 $237,546

Delaware $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

District of Columbia $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Florida $375,779 $1,038,048 $1,413,827

Georgia $116,357 $321,423 $437,780

Hawaii $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Idaho $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Illinois $203,990 $563,499 $767,489

Indiana $103,249 $285,213 $388,462

Iowa $56,693 $156,608 $213,301

Kansas $46,587 $128,691 $175,278

Kentucky $70,518 $194,798 $265,316

Louisiana $71,677 $197,999 $269,676

Maine $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Maryland $86,821 $239,834 $326,655

Massachusetts $113,578 $313,747 $427,325

Michigan $168,039 $464,188 $632,227

Minnesota $81,971 $226,435 $308,406

Mississippi $47,451 $131,078 $178,529

Missouri $102,387 $282,832 $385,219

Montana $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Nebraska $30,462 $84,149 $114,611

Nevada $35,473 $97,989 $133,462

New Hampshire $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

New Jersey $151,109 $417,420 $568,529

New Mexico $30,382 $83,926 $114,308

New York $335,906 $927,901 $1,263,807

North Carolina $138,662 $383,037 $521,699

North Dakota $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Ohio $203,446 $561,995 $765,441

Oklahoma $62,340 $172,208 $234,548

Oregon $61,248 $169,189 $230,437

Pennsylvania $249,051 $687,974 $937,025

Rhode Island $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

South Carolina $70,784 $195,533 $266,317

South Dakota $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Tennessee $100,237 $276,894 $377,131

Texas $299,526 $827,406 $1,126,932

Utah $27,423 $75,752 $103,175

Vermont $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

Virginia $116,239 $321,096 $437,335

Washington $94,881 $262,098 $356,979

West Virginia $37,261 $102,928 $140,189

Wisconsin $94,910 $262,177 $357,087

Wyoming $25,377 $70,101 $95,478

American Samoa $3,172 $8,763 $11,935

Guam $12,688 $35,050 $47,738

Northern Mariana Islands $3,172 $8,763 $11,935

Puerto Rico $64,274 $177,549 $241,823

Virgin Islands $12,688 $35,050 $47,738

Total $5,075,389 $14,020,174 $19,095,563

Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2005 Annual Allocation
#### § 785.40 When private automobile is used in travel away from home community.

If an employee is offered public transporation but requests permission to drive his car instead, the employer may count as hours worked either the time spent driving the car or the time he would have had to count as hours worked during working hours if the employee had used the public conveyance.
§ 100.25 Action on application for event not assigned to State regulation by Coast Guard-State agreement. ( a ) Where an event is one of a type not assigned to the State for regulation under a Coast Guard-State agreement (or where no such agreement has been entered), the Commander of a Coast Guard District who receives an application for a proposed regatta or marine parade to be held upon the navigable waters of the United States within his or her district shall take the following action: ( 1 ) He or she shall determine whether the proposed regatta or marine parade may be held in the proposed location with safety of life. To assist in his or her determination, he or she may, if he or she deems it necessary, hold a public hearing to obtain the views of all persons interested in, or who will be affected by, the regatta or marine parade.
( 2 ) He or she will notify the individual or organization which submitted the application: ( i ) That the application is approved, and the nature of the special local regulations, if any, which he or she will promulgate pursuant to § 100.35; or
( ii ) That the interest of safety of life on the navigable waters of the United States requires specific change or changes in the application before it can be approved; or
( iii ) That the event requires no regulation or patrol of the regatta or marine parade area; or
( iv ) That the application is not approved, with reasons for such disapproval.
[CGFR 63-22, 28 FR 5155, May 23, 1963, as amended by USCG-2003-15404, 68 FR 37740, June 25, 2003]
# National Archives andRecords Administration Office oftheFederal Register

2007 Ms. Nancy Molitor Regulations Division (AGe-20G) 

### Office orthe Chief Counsel Fede.ral Aviati01~ 

### AoministratioH, DOT 800 Independence Avenue, SW \Vashingtol1, DC 20591 Dcar Ms. Molitor: The materIal hsted inthe atiacrJ.mcnt!s approved for ll1coq)ucation by reference Jl1 14CFR Pmt 39. 11lis approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to Incorporate by reference till,';publication(s) is effective on the effective dale ofyour final rule. Ifyat! wishto enforce some other edillOn ofthe pubhcation(s) approved. YOLImust: I. Publish notice oftbe change inthe Federal Register, and amend the Code ofFederal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is onfile atthe Office of the Federal Register; and 3 Notify me in\vriting ofthe change. S1l1cerely, 

# 4'U<~:2..~ f~ RAYMOND A. MOSLEY Director ofthe Federal Register Federal Register Attorney: 

## (}VV Attachment

US mil.H address: 8601Adelphi Road, College PMk, MO 207·W-6001 Office location: 800North Capitol Street, Nv\', Suite 700,Washington, DC 200()24244 Feder,,] R"gister web sites: http://wv,,'w.archives.gov/federal-register fwd bttp;J /www.gpmcct's5,gov!llill'a/i/(;orpoI'l11ioll by Referellce Dockef No. FAA-2006-24983, Directorate Idellhjler ]005-NM-1!J6-AD,' Amdl. 39-15068, AD 2007-1}·1 f

Airbus Service Bulleiin A320- Revision 2 32A 1273 including Appendix 1 d3led May 26, 2005 Docket No. FAA-2007-:!7016: Direcrorate Identifier 20U6-NM-J76-AD. Ail/dt. 3!J-f5066; AD ]007-f j-()I)

Bonlbardier Service Bulieiin 84-26· Revision B 07 dated November 1, 2006 dated June 6, 2005 Bomb3rdier Service Bulletin A84-26- Revision A 06 Docker No, I::'AA-l007-27338: Direclorate Identifier 2006-NM-148-AD: AIJ/dt. 39- f5070: AD 2007- /f-f3
Boeing 717-200 Airworthiness Revision 5 limitations Instructions (All) Report No. MDC96K9063 dated February 2006
Docket No. FAA-2007-17509: DireclOmte Identifier lUU6-Nkl-201-AD: Amdt. 39-15067: AD 2007-J 1-/0

Fokker SelYice Bulletin sbf100- 32-142 dated August 12, 2005

PdllU!t! 5/2//UJ07 Prlgf' / of I
EXHIBIT 32.3   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company (the "Company"), for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. WolterGary J. Wolter
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 25, 2010