alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2 2 , 2023

NO. 03

- 23

- 00191

- CV

M. E. and D. R. , Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNT Y
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by t he tr i a l court on March 2 3 , 2023

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. Bec ause appellant s are

indigent a nd u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
11BConsentN-4SEC325Ex2-GWNYOneSourceChoice-SA




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-194044 of the Variable Annuity-1 Series Account of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York on Form N-4 of our report dated April 6, 2015 on the financial statements and financial highlights of each of the investment divisions of the Variable Annuity-1 Series Account of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of the Registration Statement.
We also consent to the references to us as experts under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Independent Auditors” in the Statement of Additional Information.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Denver, Colorado 
April 10, 2015
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Employment of Women in Slaughtering and Meat Packing

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth					 and 	Manning, Caroline, 1876-1966. 						*The Employment of Women in Slaughtering and Meat Packing : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 88*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1932,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5396,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00584

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D.S.Q.C. , a C hild
From the 131st Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 01087 Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023
DISMISSED Appellant moved to dismiss this appeal. Appellee has not objected to the motion. Appellant’s motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f); Caballero v. Heart of Tex

. Pizza, L.L.C. , 70 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2001, no pet.) (en banc) (per curiam).
PER CURIAM
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.133 Ouachita River.

The draw of the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad Bridge, Mile 338.8 near Camden, need not be open for the passage of vessels.

[CGD2 89-03, 55 FR 12820, Apr. 6, 1990, as amended by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35527, June 30, 1998]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6698

GARFIELD WILLIAM HOLLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. BAKER, Correctional Officer, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee, and R. A. YOUNG, Regional Director, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela M. Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-643-7) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.* The parties consented to have this matter tried by a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994). 2 Garfield William Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher GarrettHill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Garfield William Holley appeals magistrate judge’s order denying his motions to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of Appellee and to alter or amend its final judgment. * We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See Holley v. Baker, No. CA-98-643-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 26,2000). We also deny Holley’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Regional Haze SIP corrections

Rick.Boddicker to

: Gail Fallon 11/09/2011 01:38 PM

Hide Details

From: <Rick.Boddicker@state.sd.us>

To: Gail Fallon/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

History:

This message has been forwarded.



### Gail,

We have recently discovered some errors in Table 3

- 8, Table 7

- 1, and Figure 3

- 5 of our Regional Haze

State Implementation Plan. Below are the corrected numbers.

### In Figure 3.5

– Uniform Rate of Improvement, the natural conditions for Badlands should rea d 8.06 dv.

It currently is listed as 7.44 dv.

In Table 3

- 8

– Annual Uniform Rate of Improvement the numbers should be .1513 deciviews for

Badlands and .1405 deciviews for Wind Cave.

In Table 7

- 1

– 2018 Reasonable Progress Summary for South Dakota ’ s Class I Areas (a) 20% Most

Impaired Days, the Uniform Progress for Wind Cave should be 13.87 deciviews and the Uniform Progress

Achieved should be 40% for Badlands and 28% for Wind Cave.

Thanks,

Rick Boddicker

SD

- DENR

Environmental Scientist
§ 9.31 Determination of the Administrator. ( a ) *Written determination.* Upon completion of an investigation under § 9.22, the Administrator will issue a written determination of whether a violation has occurred. The determination will contain a statement of the investigation findings and conclusions. A determination that a violation occurred will address appropriate relief and the issue of debarment where appropriate. The Administrator will notify any complainant(s); employee representative(s); contractors, including the prime contractor if a subcontractor is implicated; contractor representative(s); and the contracting officer by registered or certified mail to the last known address or by any other means normally ensuring delivery, of the investigation findings.
( b ) *Notice to parties and effect* — ( 1 ) *Relevant facts in dispute.* If the Administrator concludes that relevant facts are in dispute, the Administrator's determination will so advise the parties and their representatives, if any. It will further advise that the notice of determination will become the final order of the Secretary and will not be appealable in any administrative or judicial proceeding unless an interested party requests a hearing within 20 calendar days of the date of the Administrator's determination, in accordance with § 9.32(b)(1). Such a request may be sent by mail or by any other means normally ensuring delivery to the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Administrative Law Judges. A detailed statement of the reasons why the Administrator's determination is in error, including facts alleged to be in dispute, if any, must be submitted with the request for a hearing. The Administrator's determination not to seek debarment will not be appealable.
( 2 ) *Relevant facts not in dispute.* If the Administrator concludes that no relevant facts are in dispute, the parties and their representatives, if any, will be so advised. They will also be advised that the determination will become the final order of the Secretary and will not be appealable in any administrative or judicial proceeding unless an interested party files a petition for review with the Administrative Review Board pursuant to § 9.32(b)(2) within 20 calendar days of the date of the determination of the Administrator. The determination will further advise that if an aggrieved party disagrees with the factual findings or believes there are relevant facts in dispute, the aggrieved party may advise the Administrator of the disputed facts and request a hearing by mail or by any other means normally ensuring delivery. The request must be sent within 20 calendar days of the date of the determination. The Administrator will either refer the request for a hearing to the Chief Administrative Law Judge or notify the parties and their representatives, if any, of the determination of the Administrator that there is no relevant issue of fact and that a petition for review may be filed with the Administrative Review Board within 20 calendar days of the date of the notice, in accordance with the procedures at § 9.32(b)(2).
**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                  the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                  Report. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February                  9, 2007 | /s/                  Michael W. Dosland                         |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                              | Michael                  W. Dosland                             |
|                              | President                  and Chief Executive Officer          |
|                              |                                                            |
|                              |                                                            |
| February                  9, 2007 | /s/                  Michael S. Moderski                        |
| Date                              | Michael                  S. Moderski                            |
|                              | Senior                  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                              | and                  Treasurer                                  |
|                              |                                                            |
|                              |                                                            |
#### § 118.120 Radar reflectors and racons.

The District Commander may require or authorize the installation of radar reflectors and racons on bridge structures, stakes, or buoys. Radar reflectors are used to mark the location of the edge of the navigation channel or bridge channel piers. Racons are used to mark the centerline of the channel. The District Commander may authorize the use of Automatic Identification System Aids to Navigation in lieu of or in addition to a racon.

[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16313, May 2, 1986, as amended by USCG-2005-21869, 80 FR 5330, Jan. 30, 2015]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.400 Indiana Harbor Canal. ( a ) Elgin, Joliet, and Eastern Railroad Bridge, 0.68, over the Indiana Harbor Canal need not have a drawtender in continued attendance at the bridge. Ten minutes before the bridge is lowered for train traffic a crewmember from the train will initiate a SECURITE call on VHF-FM Marine Channel 16 that the bridge will be lowering for train traffic and invite any concerned mariners to contact the crewmember on VHF-FM Marine Channel 12. The crewmember will also visually monitor for vessel traffic and listen for the standard bridge opening signal of one prolonged blast and one short blast from vessels already transiting the waterway. After the ten minute warning, another SECURITE shall be made on VHF-FM Marine Channel 16 that the bridge will be lowering for rail traffic, five minutes before lowering. Once the draw tender is satisfied that it is safe, the bridge will be lowered for rail traffic. Once the rail traffic has cleared the bridge, the bridge shall be raised and locked in the fully open to navigation position.
( b ) Elgin, Joliet, and Eastern Railroad Bridge, mile 1.89, over the Indiana Harbor Canal need not have a drawtender in continued attendance at the bridge. Ten minutes before the bridge is lowered for train traffic a crewmember from the train will initiate a SECURITE call on VHF-FM Marine Channel 16 that the bridge will be lowering for train traffic and invite any concerned mariners to contact the crewmember on VHF-FM Marine Channel 12. The crewmember will also visually monitor for vessel traffic and listen for the standard bridge opening signal of one prolonged blast and one short blast from vessels already transiting the waterway. After the ten minute warning, another SECURITE shall be made on VHF-FM Marine Channel 16 that the bridge will be lowering for rail traffic, five minutes before lowering. Once the crewmember is satisfied that it is safe, the bridge will be lowered for rail traffic. Once the rail traffic has cleared the bridge, the bridge shall be raised and locked in the fully open to navigation position.
( c ) The Indianapolis Boulevard Bridge, mile 2.59, at East Chicago, shall open on signal if at least twelve hours' notice is given.
[USCG-2020-0235, 86 FR 18446, Apr. 9, 2021, as amended by USCG-2021-0332, 86 FR 64819, Nov. 19, 2021]
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Annual Report") of EME Homer
City Generation L.P. (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his or her knowledge and belief, that:



| |  | /s/GEORGIA R. NELSONGeorgia R. Nelson
Director and President
Mission Energy Westside, Inc.,
General Partner          
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith
Director, Vice President and Treasurer
Mission Energy Westside, Inc.,
General Partner

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EME Homer City Generation L.P. and will be retained by EME Homer City Generation L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
# National Safe Boating Week, 2000

Living in a country bordered by oceans and blessed with abundant lakes and rivers, Americans have made recreational boating one of our Nation's most popular pastimes. Each year, more than 74 million Americans take to the water with family and friends to relax and enjoy the beauty of the natural world.

But each year, for too many Americans, boating ends in tragedy. Most boating-related injuries and deaths are the result of human error and poor judgment, caused, for example, by excessive speed, failure to follow safe navigation rules, and drinking or taking drugs while operating watercraft. These injuries could easily be prevented by using common sense and making safety the first priority.

Boating accidents can occur at any time—whether the water is smooth or turbulent and whether the boater is experienced or a novice. One of the best ways to make a recreational boating experience safe and enjoyable is to ensure that everyone on board always wears a life jacket. To reinforce this lifesaving message, the National Safe Boating Campaign has once again selected the theme “Boat Smart from the Start! Wear Your Life Jacket!” for this year's observance. Recreational boating organizations, including the National Safe Boating Council and the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators, as well as the U.S. Coast Guard, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments, are continuing to promote safety through education by emphasizing the importance of wearing life jackets and practicing boating and water safety.

In recognition of the importance of safe boating practices, the Congress, by joint resolution approved June 4, 1958 (36 U.S.C. 131), as amended, has authorized and requested the President to proclaim annually the 7-day period ending on the last Friday before Memorial Day as “National Safe Boating Week.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 20 through May 26, 2000, as National Safe Boating Week. I encourage the governors of the 50 States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and officials of other areas subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, to join in observing this occasion and to urge all Americans to use safe boating practices throughout the year.                          ( print page 33248)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fourth. 

[FR Doc. 00-13063

Billing code 3195-01-P
**PROGRAM INSTRUCTION**

   AOA-PI-04-03

TO:   STATE AGENCIES ON AGING ADMINISTERING

      PLANS UNDER TITLE III AND TITLE VII OF 

      THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT****(OAA) OF 1965,

 AS AMENDED.

SUBJECT:   Reallotment Procedure for 2004 OAA****TITLE       III and Title****VII****Formula Grant Funds

LEGAL AND RELATED    Section 304(b) of the Older

 REFERENCES:     Americans Act of 1965, As Amended

The purpose of this Program Instruction is to notify state agencies on aging that, by August 27, 2005, they must provide to the Administration on Aging (AoA):

1) the amount, if any, of FY 2004 Title III and/or Title VII****funds the state will not use by September 30, 2004, and is releasing for reallotment; and,

2) the request for additional Title III and/or Title VII****funds, if any, which could be obligated by the state agency****by the end****of Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2004, i.e., September 30, 2004. 

Deadline for Obligation of Funds

**We would like to remind you that funds must be obligated**

**by a State during the Federal fiscal year for which they**

**were appropriated; i.e., funds may not be obligated after September 30,2004. In addition we would like you to inform Area Agencies on Aging and the service providers of their responsibility to liquidate obligated funds within two fiscal years after the fiscal year for which these funds were awarded, i.e., this provides a total of three years for liquidation of Federal funds appropriated during a given fiscal year.**

Realloted funds are available for obligation by state agencies during the fiscal year following the fiscal year for which funds were appropriated.  In other words, if a state receives reallotted FY 2004 funds, it must obligate those funds not later than September 30, 2005.

Release of Unused Funds

State agencies not intending to use the full amount of their Title III or Title VII allotments must submit a statement signed by the authorized state agency official releasing Title III and/or Title****VII funds for reallotment.  This statement must identify from which part (B, C1, C2, D or E) the funds are being released.  If a state releases funds for reallotment, AoA will issue a revised Grant Award reflecting the decrease.

Request for Funds

If additional funds can be utilized, state agencies should  submit a brief statement justifying the need for additional funds signed by the appropriate state agency official.  The statement must identify the Parts of Title III and/or VII for which funds are being requested.

States must submit an original and one copy of their requests to their AoA Regional Administrator by August 27, 2004. States are reminded that realloted funds are one-time awards and that there is no assurance that the state will receive additional realloted funds in future years.  Also, realloted funds do not affect a state=s allocation of funds in future years.

DUE DATES:   August 27, 2004, for submission to

   Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS

   Regional Offices. 

INQUIRIES:   Inquiries should be addressed to 

   Regional Administrators on Aging,

   DHHS Regional Offices.

   Josefina G. Carbonell

   Assistant Secretary for Aging