alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANUP ARYAL,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III , Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 71462

Agency No. A200

- 998

- 622

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2018 **

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Anup Aryal, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for rev iew of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal fro m an immigration judge’s

decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdicti on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

SEP 12 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71462

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

— 40 (9th

Cir. 2010). We deny the pe tition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on vagueness and lack of detail regarding an alleged 2003 attack o n Aryal

and based on omission s regard ing the theft of A ryal’s brother’s store and Aryal’s

father ’s problems with Maoists. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination

was reasonable under the “totality of circumstances”). In the absence of credible

testimony relating to key elements of his application

, Aryal ’s asylum and

withhol ding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156

(9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Aryal’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same

testimony the agency found not credible, and the record does not otherwise compel

the conclusi on that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if returned to

Nepal

. See id. at 1156

— 57.

PETIT ION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
#### § 779.11 General statement.

The meaning and application of the provisions of law discussed in this part depend in large degree on the definitions of terms used in these provisions. The Act itself defines some of these terms. Others have been defined and construed in decisions of the courts. In the following sections some of these basic definitions are set forth for ready reference in connection with the part's discussion of the various provisions in which they appear. Some of these definitions and their application are considered in detail in other interpretative bulletins. The application of the others is considered in the sections of this part where the particular provisions containing the defined terms are discussed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2017

t0424 

# Order

Clerk May 2, 2017

154089

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154089

COA: 326593

Crawford CC: 12

- 093344

- FC

WAYNE ROBERT FARREN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos.

152946

- 8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MERCURY
GENERAL CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           780,693
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     117,686
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 939,697
<CASH>                                           4,062
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          35,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,103,406
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                261,804
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            178,550
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,405
<OTHER-SE>                                     524,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,103,406
<PREMIUMS>                                     169,563
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             16,437
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 203
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     351
<BENEFITS>                                     117,418
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     35,833
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             5,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
From: Ken Mangelsdorf <kmangelsdorf@aqmd.gov>

To: Idalia Perez/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeanhee Hong/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/22/2011 11:14 AM

Subject: RE: question about refineries and RECLAIM

Hi Indalia, I checked with our RECLAIM group and ALL of the refineries are in

RECLAIM both for NOx and SOx. We have several re

- refiners and they are also

in for both except for one which is being added to the SOx universe.

If you have any other question s please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,

Ken Mangelsdorf

Staff Specialist

Permit Streamlining \ Compliance Enhancement

Phone: (909) 396

- 2420

kmangelsdorf@aqmd.gov

From: Perez.Idalia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Perez.Idalia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:22 PM

To: Ken Mangelsdorf

Cc: Hong.Jeanhee@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: question about refineries and RECLAIM

Hi Ken

John Borton here at Region 9 suggested I contact you regarding a question on

refineries.

Are all refineries in SCA QMD in the RECLAIM program, for both NOx and SOx?

John indicated that as far as he knew they were, but he suggested I double

check with you.

Thanks,

- Idalia

_____________________ Idalia M. Pérez, Ph.D.

Rulemaking Office, Air Division

US EPA (AIR

- 4) | 75 Hawthorne St. | San Francisco, CA 94105

P: 415.972.3248 | F: 415.947.3579
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Vertical Computer System,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  March 30, 2005                       By:      /s/ Sheri Pantermuehl
                                                    ---------------------
                                           Name:    Sheri Pantermuehl
                                           Title:   Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required  by Section  906,  has been  provided  by  Vertical
Computer Systems,  Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Computer Systems,  Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.163 Islais Creek (Channel). ( a ) The draw of the Illinois Street drawbridge, mile 0.3 at San Francisco, shall open on signal if at least 72 hours advance notice is given to the Port of San Francisco.
( b ) The draw of the Third Street drawbridge, mile 0.4 at San Francisco, shall open on signal if at least 72 hours advance notice is given to the San Francisco Department of Public Works.
[USCG-2008-0648, 73 FR 74019, Dec. 5, 2008, as amended by USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30879, June 28, 2019]
AEROSPACE
Bombardier Inc. 400 chemin de la Côte-Vertu
West Dorval, Québec, Canada H4S 1Y9 www.bombardier.com

TEL 514-855-5000

F AX 5 14

- 855-8436 2016-04-04
AW/BD5/16/198

Docket No.: FAA-2016-2750

References: 1. AW-BD5-15-570 Petition for Exemption from section 14 CFR Part 25.901(c) for the Thrust Quadrant Assembly of the Bombardier Aerospace BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11(C Series CS100 and C Series CS300 respectively) aircraft model, dated 2016-01-13 2. FAA letter requesting additional information for Docket No.:FAA-2016- 2750, dated March 21, 2016 3. AW-BD5-16-198 – Addendum 1 – TQA Design Robustness – Single Failure; dated April 4, 2016

Dear Mr. Regimbal,

Bombardier Aerospace (BA) submitted a petition for exemption from section 14 CFR Part 25.901(c) for the Thrust Quadrant Assembly, dated January 13, 2016 [Reference 1]. This petition has been assisgned docket number FAA-2016-2750. FAA requested additional clarification in their letter dated March 21, 2016 [Reference 2]. The BA response to the FAA concerns is outlined in Addendum 1 to this letter [Reference 3]. This document contains proprietary information and has therefore not been uploaded to the docket. Addendum 1 has been submitted to the focals for the C Series project (FAA Project No.: TC4948NY-T) at the New York Aircraft Certification Office (NYACO) and the Transport Airplane Directorate (TAD).

If you have any questions or require any additional information please contact Glenn Baxter via the contact information listed below.
Best regards,

Manager, C Series Airworthiness Bombardier Aerospace glenn.jr.baxter@aero.bombardier.com U. S. Department of Transportation ATTN: Jon Regimbal Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Glenn Baxter
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 00-866; MM Docket No. 90-466; RM-7327, RM-7987, RM-7988, RM-8705]. 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; petition for reconsideration. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commission dismisses as moot the Application for Review filed by Reding Broadcasting Company, requesting reconsideration of a dismissal of its proposal to substitute Channel 252A for Channel 253C2 at Pleasanton, TX, substitute Channel 253A for Channel 290A at Hondo, TX and Channel 252A for Channel 276A at Bandera, TX. Petitioner received requested relief in MM Docket No. 98-55. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Victoria M. McCauley, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Order, MM Docket No. 90-466 adopted April 12, 2000, and released April 14, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos,

 Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-13138 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 390 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 390

Designating March 11, 2008, as National Funeral Director and Mortician 
                            Recognition Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2007

Mr. Kohl submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating March 11, 2008, as National Funeral Director and Mortician 
                            Recognition Day.

Whereas the death of a family member, friend, or loved one is a devastating 
        emotional event;
Whereas the memorialization and celebration of the decedent's life is the fabric 
        of today's funeral service;
Whereas the family of the decedent has traditionally looked to funeral directors 
        and morticians for consolation, strength, and guidance in the planning 
        and implementation of a meaningful funeral ceremony;
Whereas funeral directors and morticians have dedicated their professional lives 
        to serving the families of their communities in their times of need for 
        generations with caring, compassion, and integrity;
Whereas these special men and women see their chosen profession as a higher 
        calling, a sacred trust, in serving every family regardless of social 
        standing, financial means, or time of day or day of the year, whenever a 
        death occurs; and
Whereas on this special day, March 11, 2008, it would be appropriate to pay 
        tribute to these funeral directors and morticians who, day in and day 
        out, assist our Nation's families in their times of sadness and grief 
        and help families mourn a death and celebrate a life: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) takes this opportunity to pay the Nation's collective 
        debt of gratitude for all the hours and all the times they have 
        put someone ahead of themselves by serving the living while 
        caring for the dead;
            (2) urges every American of every walk of life to embrace 
        each of these special individuals with heartfelt thanks for 
        their dedication to their profession; and
            (3) designates March 11, 2008, as ``National Funeral 
        Director and Mortician Recognition Day''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
 **(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the
“Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Glenn A. Kleinert, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
March 14, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Glenn A. Kleinert
 Glenn A.
Kleinert
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Nutrition Services Incentive Program (OANS) for the States/Territories

FY 2020 Final Cash Allocation

7/31/2020

State/Territory

Nutrition Services 

Incentive Program

Alabama 3,221,143

Alaska 479,564

Arizona 1,909,639

Arkansas 2,368,292

California 13,341,044

Colorado 1,438,429

Connecticut 1,391,493

Delaware 505,197

District of Columbia 861,837

Florida 6,323,772

Georgia 3,057,665

Hawaii 497,199

Idaho 806,027

Illinois 7,385,172

Indiana 1,241,683

Iowa 1,395,772

Kansas 2,066,315

Kentucky 1,496,032

Louisiana 3,767,360

Maine 625,289

Maryland 1,646,882

Massachusetts 6,285,810

Michigan 7,846,090

Minnesota 1,746,160

Mississippi 1,489,656

Missouri 3,847,942

Montana 961,155

Nebraska 1,031,494

Nevada 1,605,363

New Hampshire 1,208,093

New Jersey 3,473,368

New Mexico 2,269,306

New York 16,277,034

North Carolina 3,378,519

North Dakota 805,142

Ohio 5,716,212

Oklahoma 1,791,402

Oregon 1,598,413

Pennsylvania 6,642,866

Rhode Island 418,528

South Carolina 1,772,670

South Dakota 951,768

Tennessee 1,698,053

Texas 10,225,621

Utah 1,316,522

Vermont 779,140

Virginia 1,914,861

Washington 2,342,795

West Virginia 1,539,044

Wisconsin 2,727,265

Wyoming 888,652

American Samoa 84,875

Guam 390,715

Northern Mariana Islands 68,616

Puerto Rico 2,709,041

Virgin Islands 106,586

TOTAL $153,734,583
#### § 780.805 Ginning of “cotton.”

Only the ginning of “cotton” is within the first part of the exemption. An employee engaged in ginning of moss, for example, would not be exempt. The reconditioning of cotton waste resulting from spinning or oil mill operations is not included, since such waste is not the agricultural commodity in its natural state for whose first processing the exemption was provided. (See 107 Cong. Rec. (daily ed.) p. 5887.) The “cotton,” “seed cotton,” and “lint cotton” ginned by ordinary gins do not include “linter” or “Grabbot” cotton, obtained by reginning cotton seed and hard locks of cotton mixed with hulls, bolls, and other substances which could not be removed by ordinary ginning (*Mississippi Levee Com'rs* v. *Refuge Cotton Oil Co.,* 91 Miss. 480, 44 So. 828, 829). Mote ginning, the process whereby raw motes (leaves, trash, sticks, dirt, and immature cotton with some cottonseed) are run through a ginning process to extract the short-fiber cotton, is not included in the ginning of cotton unless it is done as a part of the whole ginning process in one gin establishment as a continuous and uninterrupted series of operations resulting in useful cotton products including the regular “gin” bales, the “mote” bales (short-fiber cotton), and the cottonseed.