alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 136.309 Advertisement determinations. ( a ) The Director, NPFC, determines for each incident the type, geographic scope, frequency, and duration of advertisement required.
( b ) In making the determination specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the Director, NPFC, may consider— ( 1 ) The nature and extent of economic losses that have occurred or are likely to occur;
( 2 ) The potential claimants who are likely to incur economic losses;
( 3 ) The geographical area that is or will likely be affected;
( 4 ) The most effective method of reasonably notifying potential claimants of the designation and procedures of submitting claims; and
( 5 ) Relevant information or recommendations, if any, submitted by, or on behalf of, the responsible party or guarantor of the designated source.
( c ) The Director, NPFC, provides the specific requirements for advertisement for each incident to the responsible party or guarantor of the designated source.
( d ) If a responsible party or guarantor has not denied designation in accordance with § 136.307, the party or guarantor shall advertise, in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, the designation and the procedures by which claims may be presented. The advertisement must begin not later than 15 days after the date of the designation made under § 136.305.
( e ) If there is no designation under § 136.305, if the source of the discharge or threat is a public vessel, or if the responsible party and guarantor of the source designated have denied the designation or failed to meet the requirements for advertisement in this section, the Director, NPFC, may advertise procedures for presenting claims.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

We , Danong Chen, Chief Executive Officer of Tanox, Inc. and Gregory P. Guidroz, Vice President of
Finance of Tanox, Inc. certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tanox, Inc. for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tanox, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                       |  | 
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Danong Chen                       |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Danong Chen                           |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                     |  |     | 
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gregory P. Guidroz                |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Gregory P. Guidroz                    |  | 
|                     |  |     |  | Vice President of Finance             |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Tanox, Inc. and will be retained by Tanox, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20075

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO CRUZ, also known as Harold Antonio Esprilla,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-352

--------------------

February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Harold Antonio Esprilla,

a.k.a. Antonio Cruz has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as

counsel and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Esprilla received a copy

of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief reveals no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.735 What are other critical criteria that must be evaluated? In accordance with § 148.715(b) of this part, the deepwater port proposal and reasonable alternatives will be evaluated on the basis of how well they: ( a ) Avoid detrimental effects on human health and safety;
( b ) Pose no compromise to national security;
( c ) Account for the historic, archeological, and cultural significance of the area, including any potential requirements for historical preservation;
( d ) Minimize harmful impacts to minorities and children; and
( e ) Plan for serious consideration of the proposal that offers the least potential for environmental harm to the region, or potential mitigation actions, when conflict exists between two or more proposed uses for a site.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
### STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DALLAS TRAHAN NO. 

### 2023 KW 1165


### JANUARY 18, 2024

In Re: Dallas Trahan, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 32nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 

### 464, 472.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., 

### CHUM AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. 

## Relator failed to meet his burden of proof on his 

### factual 

### innocence claim. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 

### 930.2. 

## Additionally, the claim is repetitive. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930.4 (D) . 

## Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its 

## discretion bydismissing the application for postconviction 

## reliefinitsentirety. JMG WRC WIL
Exhibit 12.1  MGE Energy, Inc. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2006 (In thousands)  EarningsNet Income$ 42,423Equity earnings(5,645)Income distribution from equity investees4,003Federal and state income taxes25,899Amortization of capitalized interest102Interest capitalized(1,916)Fixed charges18,198Total Earnings as Defined$83,064Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$14,406Interest on rentals*1,046AFUDC borrowed funds235Capitalized interest1,916Amortization of debt issuance costs595Total Fixed Charges$18,198Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges4.56x   *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
----

**EXHIBIT 31.2**

Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer 

I, Garry Wong, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

|                          |                         |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
| Date:  May 14, 2008 | /s/ Garry Wong          |
|                     | Garry Wong              |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 377 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 377

   Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma statehood.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 13, 2007

    Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Coburn) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and celebrating the centennial of Oklahoma statehood.

Whereas, on November 16, 1907, Oklahoma officially became the 46th State of the 
        Union;
Whereas the State of Oklahoma is known as the Sooner State;
Whereas the State of Oklahoma has become a national leader in agriculture, 
        natural resource industries, technology, and manufacturing;
Whereas the people of Oklahoma have harvested the natural abundance of the State 
        to produce a wealth which has enabled the building of cities, 
        educational institutions, an unhurried pace of life, and a rich culture, 
        while maintaining the pristine ecology;
Whereas the beautiful mountains, rivers, lakes, trees, plains, and fields of the 
        State of Oklahoma are appreciated and preserved, and the quality of life 
        is unsurpassed; and
Whereas, on November 16, 2007, the State of Oklahoma will begin a new century of 
        statehood: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and celebrates the centennial 
of Oklahoma statehood.
                                 <all>
```
Argued and submitted March 31,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing October 14, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PAUL WESLEY FRAZE, *Appellant.*

(89-12-37295; CA A68564)

838 P2d 81

Eric R. Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*580PER CURIAM

After a trial to the court, defendant was found guilty of, among other things, felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1), unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250(1), and delivery of a controlled substance as part of a scheme or network. ORS 475.992; OAR 253-04-002(3). He contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him on the firearms charges and that the court erred in applying the “scheme or network” aggravating factor in determining his sentence. We affirm the convictions because the errors were not preserved and remand for resentencing on the charge of delivery of a controlled substance.

On the controlled substance charge, defendant contends that the court erred in increasing the crime serious ranking of his delivery of a controlled substance conviction based on the “scheme or network” allegation. He did not demurrer to the indictment but, before sentencing, he challenged the constitutionality of the scheme or network language. He has preserved his challenge to the sentence and the state concedes that the sentence is improper. *State v. Moeller,*105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, *rev dismissed*312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession and remand for resentencing. *State v. Medina,*111 Or App 108, 109, 823 P2d 453 (1992).

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on the delivery of a controlled substance charge.
|                                                                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                       |
| **Media Contact(s)**: NNSA Public Affairs, 202-586-7371                                                                               |
|                                                                                                                                  |
| **Nuclear Weapons Council**                                                                                                           |
| *Nuclear Weapons Responsibilities of the Department of Defense (DoD) & the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)*  |
ACL Help American Vote Act for PA (PAVA) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2023 Final Allocation

8/29/2023

State/Territory

Help American Vote 

Act for P&A (PAVA)

Alabama $141,043

Alaska $141,043

Arizona $141,043

Arkansas $141,043

California $650,113

Colorado $141,043

Connecticut $141,043

Delaware $141,043

District of Columbia $141,043

Florida $360,881

Georgia $178,933

Hawaii $141,043

Idaho $141,043

Illinois $209,947

Indiana $141,043

Iowa $141,043

Kansas $141,043

Kentucky $141,043

Louisiana $141,043

Maine $141,043

Maryland $141,043

Massachusetts $141,043

Michigan $166,527

Minnesota $141,043

Mississippi $141,043

Missouri $141,043

Montana $141,043

Nebraska $141,043

Nevada $141,043

New Hampshire $141,043

New Jersey $153,543

New Mexico $141,043

New York $328,652

North Carolina $174,817

North Dakota $141,043

Ohio $195,177

Oklahoma $141,043

Oregon $141,043

Pennsylvania $214,795

Rhode Island $141,043

South Carolina $141,043

South Dakota $141,043

Tennessee $141,043

Texas $489,234

Utah $141,043

Vermont $141,043

Virginia $143,190

Washington $141,043

West Virginia $141,043

Wisconsin $141,043

Wyoming $141,043

American Samoa $70,521

Guam $70,521

Northern Mariana Islands $70,521

Puerto Rico $141,043

Virgin Islands $70,521

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $70,521

TOTAL $9,260,134
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

 

 

May 4, 2009

 

 

Alexander’s, Inc.

Paramus, New Jersey

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Alexander’s, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated May 4, 2009, (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of FASB Statement No. 160, *Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements);*because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our reports referred to above, which were included in your Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 is incorporated by reference in the following registration statements of Alexander’s, Inc.:

 

Registration Statement No. 333-151721 on Form S-8

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-155727 on Form S-3

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
Order entered November 29 , 2017

Nov

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01042
- CR No. 05
- 17
- 0104 3
- CR No. 05
- 17
- 0104 4
- CR
JAIME ANTONIO ALVARE NGA, Appellant

V. THE STA TE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F11
- 26734
- V , F11
- 2673 6
- V & F11
- 2673 9
- V 

### O RDER
Before the Court are appellant’s November 20, 2017 documents entitled “Objection Filed ” which we will construe as motion s to supplement the reporter’s record under rule 34.6(d) of the rules of appellate procedure. We GRANT the motion s and ORDER official deputy court reporter Robin Washington to file, within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, a supplement al reporter’s record of the March 23, 2015 arraignment hearing. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Brandon Birmingham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; to Peri Wood, of ficial court reporter; to Robin Washington, official deputy court reporter, 292nd Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 398 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 398

 Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of Joe Nuxhall, 
                  broadcaster for the Cincinnati Reds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2007

Mr. Brown submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of Joe Nuxhall, 
                  broadcaster for the Cincinnati Reds.

Whereas Joe Nuxhall was born on July 30, 1928, in Hamilton, Ohio;
Whereas on June 10, 1944, at the age of 15 years, 10 months, and 11 days Joe 
        Nuxhall became the youngest player in the modern era to appear in a 
        major league baseball game;
Whereas Joe Nuxhall earned over 100 victories in his sixteen year major league 
        career and was elected into the Cincinnati Reds Hall of Fame;
Whereas Joe Nuxhall began a radio broadcasting career in 1967 and went on to 
        call over 6,000 games for the Cincinnati Reds;
Whereas Joe Nuxhall had a career spanning over sixty years with the Cincinnati 
        Reds;
Whereas Joe Nuxhall will be remembered for his signature sign off, ``This is the 
        Ol' Lefthander rounding third and heading for home.'';
Whereas Joe Nuxhall whose voice was synonymous with baseball and the summer for 
        generations of fans across the country;
Whereas Joe Nuxhall was a beloved community leader, philanthropist, husband, 
        father, and advocate for children, public schools, and the elderly; and
Whereas Ohio has lost a beloved son and baseball one of its most distinctive 
        voices with the passing of Joe Nuxhall on November 15, 2007: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors the life of Joe Nuxhall, baseball 
legend, dedicated family man, and civic-minded leader.
                                 <all>
```
FOREST RESOURCES OF SOUTHWEST JiLABLtlA 

A Progress Report 

by 

THE SOUTHERN FOREST SURVEY 

I. F. Eldredge 

Regional Survey Director 

SOUTHERN FOREST EXFERIXENT STATION 

E. L, Demon, Director 

New Orlems, La.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 53 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 53

       Congratulating Illinois State University as it marks its 
                           sesquicentennial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2007

    Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Obama) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Congratulating Illinois State University as it marks its 
                           sesquicentennial.

Whereas Illinois State University marks its sesquicentennial with a year-long 
        celebration, beginning with Founders Day on February 15, 2007;
Whereas Illinois State University is the oldest public university in the State 
        of Illinois;
Whereas Illinois State University has 34 academic departments and offers more 
        than 160 programs of study in the College of Applied Science and 
        Technology, the College of Arts and Sciences, the College of Business, 
        the College of Education, the College of Fine Arts, and the Mennonite 
        College of Nursing;
Whereas Illinois State University is 1 of the 10 largest producers of teachers 
        in the Nation, and nearly 1 in 7 Illinois teachers holds a degree from 
        Illinois State University;
Whereas Milner Library at Illinois State University contains more than 3 million 
        holdings and special collections;
Whereas Illinois State University is ranked nationally as one of the 100 ``best 
        values'' in public higher education; and
Whereas Illinois State University participates in the American Democracy 
        Project, an initiative that prepares students to engage in a competitive 
        global society: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Illinois State University 
as it marks its sesquicentennial.
                                 <all>
```