alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# ACTION:

 Notice.

      ( print page 34447)    

# SUMMARY:

The Board of Visitors for the Department of Defense Regional Security Centers was renewed, effective May 1, 2000, in consonance with the public interest, and in accordance with the provisions of Pub. L. 92-463, the “Federal Advisory Committee Act.”

The Board of Visitors, comprised of a balanced membership of leading experts in the field of national security, is essential in providing advice and counsel to the Secretary of Defense, other senior Pentagon officials, and sound management of the DoD Regional Security Centers. The Board members are chosen for their experience and knowledge of national security affairs, academics, and regional political-military issues. They advise senior DoD officials on matters relating to mission, policy, course content, faculty, and administration of the Centers.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Berry, Director, Regional Affairs (703) 695-6386.

Dated: May 23, 2000.

Linda M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-13407  Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010.

2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### § 1.05-50 Final rule.

When notice and comment procedures have been used, and after all comments received have been considered, a final rule is issued. A final rule document contains a preamble that responds to significant comments received and includes a discussion of changes made from the proposed or interim rule, a citation of legal authority, and the text of the rule. In some instances, a final rule may be issued without prior notice and comment.

[USCG-2018-0533, 85 FR 8172, Feb. 13, 2020]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11274

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

QUINTUS RECORD, also known as Quint,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-188-1

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Quintus Record has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Record has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11274 Document: 00513956061 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2017
No. 16-11274

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-11274 Document: 00513956061 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2017
#### In the Matter of Robert L. Schulz et al., Appellants, v Rush-Henrietta Central School District Board of Education et al., Respondents. State of New York, Intervenor.

Submitted February 20, 1996;

decided April 30, 1996

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
§ 137.75 The relationship of the purchase price to the value of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located, if oil was not at the facility or on the real property. ( a ) Persons specified in § 137.1(a) must consider whether the purchase price of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located reasonably reflects the fair market value of the facility and real property if oil was not present or likely present.
( b ) If the persons conclude that the purchase price does not reasonably reflect the fair market value of that facility and real property if oil was not at the facility and the real property, they must consider whether or not the differential in purchase price and fair market value is due to the presence or likely presence of oil.
FAA Home
Regulations & Policies
Advisory Circulars (ACs)

# AC 150/5340-1J - Standards for Airport Markings (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5340-1J
- Title
- Standards for Airport Markings
- Date cancelled
- 2010-09-03
- Cancellation notes
- 150/5340-iK
- Date issued
- 2005-04-29
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards - Airport Engineering Division 
- Description
-  Describes the standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. 
- Content
-    -  150/5340-1J  (PDF) 
  -  150/5340-1J  (MS Word) 
- Changes
-  ChangesChangeTitleDate1Change 1 - Standards for Airport Markings												Extends enhanced taxiway centerline requirement to all certificated airports. Airports with less that 1.5 million annual passenger enplanements must implement the enhanced taxiway centerline within 1 year. All smaller certificated airports have 2 years. **Cancelled by Change 2.**-  150/5340-1J Change 1  (PDF) 
-  150/5340-1J Change 1  (MS Word) 
2008-03-312Change 2 - Standards for Airport Markings												Clarifies the intent of Change 1 and modifies certain compliance dates for airports located in areas that receive snow or ice storms. **Cancels Change 1.**-  150/5340-1J Change 2  (PDF) 
-  150/5340-1J Change 2  (MS Word) 
-  Errata Sheet for 150/5340-1J Change 2 (July 3, 2008)  (MS Word) 
2008-06-06 
- Cancels
-  CancelsNumberTitleDate150/5340-1HStandards for Airport Markings												Describes the standards for markings used on airport runways, taxiways, and aprons. 											1999-08-31 

## View All

      - Current ACs
      - Cancelled ACs
      - Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs

## Export All

      - Current ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled ACs  (CSV)

## Contact Information

      - Advisory Circulars Administrator
      - Other Points of Contact  (MS Excel)
RICHARD F. BRYANT

, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO

. 1D 17

- 0287

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 13 , 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Karen A. Gievers , Judge

. Richard F. Bryant, pro se , Appellant.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offende r Review, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

U pon consideration of appellant's response to the Court's order of April 3,

2017, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to seek review upon rendition of a

final order in the circuit court proceedin g.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### § 137.15 References: Where can I get a copy of the publication mentioned in this part?

Section 137.20 of this part refers to ASTM E 1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. That document is available from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. It is also available for inspection at the Coast Guard National Pollution Funds Center, Law Library, NPFC CV, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7605, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7605.

[USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27441, June 10, 2009, as amended by USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35082, July 28, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35396-35397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13785]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated February 25, 2000, and published in the Federal 
Register on March 6, 2000, (65 FR 44) Chattem Chemicals, Inc., 3708 St. 
Elmo Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee 34709, made application by letter 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of amphetamine (1100), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to bulk manufacture amphetamine for distribution to 
its customers.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Chattem 
Chemicals, Inc. to manufacture amphetamine is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Chattem Chemicals, 
Inc. to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent 
with the public interest. The investigations have included inspection 
and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of 
the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the

[[Page 35397]]

company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 
and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office 
of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by 
the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic 
class of controlled substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: May 22, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-13785 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
§ 93.100 Conditions on use of funds. ( a ) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative ageement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, set forth in appendix A, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
( d ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, set forth in appendix A, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
( e ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                 17,646,612
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  3,083,250
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>           111,918,527
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 23,227,582
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   22,850,831
<LOANS>                               526,050,321
<ALLOWANCE>                             3,528,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        734,106,565
<DEPOSITS>                            470,574,279
<SHORT-TERM>                          104,393,164
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    10,121,890
<LONG-TERM>                            79,073,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                   48,342
<OTHER-SE>                             69,895,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        734,106,565
<INTEREST-LOAN>                        10,323,525
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       2,619,520
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           37,463
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       12,980,508
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      5,609,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      8,468,429
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   4,512,079
<LOAN-LOSSES>                             145,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          7,637
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         4,244,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,733,592
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              1,210,592
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,210,592
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               2.68
<LOANS-NON>                               463,000
<LOANS-PAST>                            1,740,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          444,046
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            79,165
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        3,394,448
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              37,661
<RECOVERIES>                               26,859
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       3,528,646
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    3,528,646
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         0



</TABLE>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 37 

Designating March 26, 2007, as ‘‘National Support the Troops Day’’ and 

encouraging the people of the United States to participate in a moment 

of silence to reflect upon the service and sacrifice of members of the 

Armed Forces both at home and abroad. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2007 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. LEVIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 26, 2007, as ‘‘National Support the 

Troops Day’’ and encouraging the people of the United 

States to participate in a moment of silence to reflect 

upon the service and sacrifice of members of the Armed 

Forces both at home and abroad. 

Whereas it was through the brave and noble efforts of the 

forefathers of the United States that the United States 

first gained freedom and became a sovereign country; 

Whereas there are more than 1,300,000 regular members of 

the Armed Forces and more than 1,100,000 members of 

the National Guard and Reserves serving the Nation in 

support and defense of the values and freedom that all 

people in the United States cherish; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 37 IS 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces deserve the utmost respect and admiration of the people of the United 

States for putting their lives in danger for the sake of 

the freedoms enjoyed by all people of the United States; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are defending freedom and democracy around the globe and are playing a 

vital role in protecting the safety and security of all the 

people of the United States; and 

Whereas all people of the United States should participate in 

a moment of silence to support the troops: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 26, 2007, as ‘‘National 

3 Support the Troops Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages all people in the United States 

5 to participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon 

6 the service and sacrifice of members of the Armed 

7 Forces both at home and abroad. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 105.300 General. ( a ) The Facility Security Assessment (FSA) is a written document that is based on the collection of background information, the completion of an on-scene survey and an analysis of that information.
( b ) A common FSA may be conducted for more than one similar facility provided the FSA reflects any facility-specific characteristics that are unique.
( c ) Third parties may be used in any aspect of the FSA if they have the appropriate skills and if the Facility Security Officer (FSO) reviews and accepts their work.
( d ) Those involved in a FSA must be able to draw upon expert assistance in the following areas, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
( 2 ) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
( 3 ) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of persons who are likely to threaten security;
( 4 ) Techniques used to circumvent security measures;
( 5 ) Methods used to cause a security incident;
( 6 ) Effects of dangerous substances and devices on structures and facility services;
( 7 ) Facility security requirements;
( 8 ) Facility and vessel interface business practices;
( 9 ) Contingency planning, emergency preparedness, and response;
( 10 ) Physical security requirements;
( 11 ) Radio and telecommunications systems, including computer systems and networks;
( 12 ) Marine or civil engineering; and
( 13 ) Facility and vessel operations.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13857]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List commodities to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis R. Bartalot, (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 24, 2000, the Committee for 
Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published 
notice (65 FR 15897) of proposed additions to the Procurement List. 
After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the commodities 
and impact of the addition on the current or most recent contractors, 
the Committee has determined that the commodities listed below are 
suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-
48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the commodities to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the commodities.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the commodities to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the commodities proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following commodities are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Tape, Electronic Data
    7045-01-391-0947
    7045-01-438-7086

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.

Leon A. Wilson, Jr.,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-13857 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
TERON D. HARRISON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3743

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Teron D. Harrison, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.