42680 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

treatment of these organizational costs 

by the new partnership. 

* * * * * 

(5) * * * Paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this 

section applies to a technical 

termination of a partnership under 

section 708(b)(1)(B) that occurs on or 

after December 9, 2013. 

John Dalrymple, 

Deputy Commissioner for Services and 

Enforcement. 

Approved: May 29, 2014. 

Mark J. Mazur, 

Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax 

Policy). 

[FR Doc. 2014–17335 Filed 7–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[Docket ID ED–2014–OSERS–0068] 

Final Priority; Rehabilitation Training: 

Rehabilitation Long-Term Training 

Program—Rehabilitation Specialty 

Areas 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Final priority. 

[CFDA Numbers: 84.129C, E, F, H, J, P, Q, 

R, and W.] 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services announces a priority under the 

Rehabilitation Training: Rehabilitation 

Long-Term Training program. The 

Assistant Secretary may use this priority 

for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2014 

and later years in order to fund any of 

the rehabilitation specialty areas listed 

in this notice. The specific 

rehabilitation specialty areas to be 

funded in a given year will be listed in 

a notice inviting applications. This 

priority is designed to ensure that the 

Department funds high-quality 

rehabilitation programs in the following 

nine rehabilitation specialty areas of 

national need: Rehabilitation 

Administration (84.129C); 

Rehabilitation Technology (84.129E); 

Vocational Evaluation and Work 

Adjustment (84.129F); Rehabilitation of 

Individuals Who Are Mentally Ill 

(84.129H); Rehabilitation Psychology 

(84.129J); Rehabilitation of Individuals 

Who are Blind or Have Vision 

Impairments (84.129P); Rehabilitation of 

Individuals Who are Deaf or Hard of 

Hearing (84.129Q); Job Development 

and Job Placement Services (84.129R); 

and Comprehensive System of 

Personnel Development (84.129W). 

These programs must meet rigorous 

standards in order to provide 

rehabilitation professionals the training 

and qualifications necessary to meet the 

current challenges facing State 

vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies 

and related agencies and assist 

individuals with disabilities in 

achieving high-quality employment 

outcomes. 

DATES: Effective Date: This priority is 

effective August 22, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

RoseAnn Ashby, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

room 5055, Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), 

Washington, DC 20202–2800. 

Telephone: (202) 245–7258 or by email: 

roseann.ashby@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of 

Program: The Rehabilitation Long-Term 

Training program provides financial 

assistance for projects that provide— 

(1) Basic or advanced training leading 

to an academic degree in areas of 

personnel shortages in rehabilitation as 

identified by the Secretary; 

(2) A specified series of courses or 

programs of study leading to the award 

of a certificate in areas of personnel 

shortages in rehabilitation as identified 

by the Secretary; and 

(3) Support for medical residents 

enrolled in residency training programs 

in the specialty of physical medicine 

and rehabilitation. 

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 772(b). 

Applicable Program Regulations: 34 

CFR parts 385 and 386. 

We published a notice of proposed 

priority for this competition in the 

Federal Register on May 13, 2014 (79 

FR 27236). That notice contained 

background information and our reasons 

for proposing this particular priority. 

There are no differences between the 

proposed priority and this final priority. 

Public Comment: In response to our 

invitation in the notice of proposed 

priority, 24 parties submitted comments 

on the proposed priority. 

Generally, we do not address 

technical and other minor changes. 

Analysis of Comments and Changes: 

An analysis of the comments and of any 

changes in the priority since publication 

of the notice of proposed priority 

follows. 

Comment: The overwhelming 

majority of commenters were supportive 

of the priority. They pointed out that it 

is important to have rehabilitation 

professionals trained in meeting the 

needs of individuals with a variety of 

disabilities. In particular, a number of 

commenters discussed the value that 

rehabilitation professionals trained in 

vocational evaluation can add to the 

field of rehabilitation. Professionals 

trained in vocational evaluation have 

particular expertise in assisting 

individuals with disabilities in making 

employment and career choices 

consistent with their unique abilities, 

thereby helping to ensure that 

individuals with disabilities achieve 

their employment goals. 

Discussion: We appreciate the 

commenters’ support for this priority. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: Two commenters 

expressed concern regarding the 

requirement for scholars to participate 

in an internship in a State VR agency as 

a requirement for program completion. 

They stated that internships may not be 

available in a State VR agency, 

particularly for those pursuing a 

rehabilitation program for serving 

individuals who are deaf or hard of 

hearing. Commenters stated that some 

State VR agencies may not have 

individuals qualified to supervise such 

internships, whereas other related 

agencies in the community may be able 

to provide internship opportunities that 

offer qualified supervisors and that 

would ultimately be more beneficial for 

scholars. 

Discussion: We recognize that there 

may be some instances in which an 

institution of higher education receiving 

funds under this priority will need to 

develop internships in agencies other 

than the State VR agency. For this 

reason, paragraph (c)(5) of the priority 

provides an exception to this 

requirement in the event that a State VR 

agency cannot provide an internship in 

a scholar’s field of study or if applicants 

demonstrate that it is otherwise not 

feasible for all students to complete an 

internship in a State VR agency. For 

example, if an applicant demonstrates 

that it is not feasible to provide the 

scholar an internship in a State VR 

agency because there are no staff able to 

supervise the individual or because the 

distance that the scholar would have to 

travel to the State VR agency is too 

great, then the scholar could be 

provided an internship in a related 

agency as defined in 34 CFR 386.4. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: Two commenters 

discussed the importance of 

coordination among professional 

associations, long-term training 

programs, and State VR agencies, 

specifically in the field of vocational 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 42681 

evaluation. They indicated that 

collaboration would provide robust 

discussions, opportunities both for 

student training and for continuing 

education of professional evaluators, 

connections with associations that offer 

certifications, consultative support to 

long-term training programs and State 

VR agencies, and the identification of 

employment opportunities for 

rehabilitation professionals. 

Discussion: We agree with these 

commenters regarding the importance of 

collaboration among professional 

associations, long-term training 

programs, and State VR agencies. 

Nothing in this priority would prevent 

an applicant from developing 

collaborations with professional 

associations. However, we do not 

believe that it is necessary to make this 

a requirement. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: One commenter expressed 

concern about use of the term 

‘‘rehabilitation specialty’’ to describe 

the nine specific emphases in this 

priority. This commenter felt the term 

‘‘rehabilitation specialty’’ when 

referring to professional areas of focus 

other than VR counseling demeans these 

professions. 

Discussion: This priority describes 

training programs for a number of 

rehabilitation professionals. The use of 

the term ‘‘rehabilitation specialty’’ is 

simply a convenient and easily 

understood term to distinguish between 

the general VR counselor training 

programs the Department funds and the 

programs described in this priority that 

train professionals who work with 

certain disability populations or who 

have skills in specific aspects of 

rehabilitation. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: One commenter asked that 

the priority specifically mention 

individuals who are deaf-blind or latedeafened in the discussion of 

rehabilitation of individuals who are 

deaf or hard of hearing. The commenter 

emphasized that individuals who are 

deaf, hard of hearing, late-deafened, and 

deaf-blind are four discrete populations 

with differing cultural, psychosocial, 

communication, and technology needs. 

Discussion: We recognize that the four 

populations of individuals with 

disabilities mentioned by the 

commenter have varying needs and that 

having coursework to train 

rehabilitation professionals to address 

these needs would be appropriate. The 

specialty area includes all four of these 

populations and nothing in this priority 

would prevent an applicant from 

proposing coursework that would 

address the rehabilitation needs of all 

four populations. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: Several commenters 

discussed the need for individuals 

trained as vocational evaluators to learn 

how to assess the strengths of 

individuals who are deaf. They were 

concerned that individuals graduating 

with a degree in vocational evaluation 

often do not get the training they need 

to accurately perform these assessments. 

They encouraged coursework to address 

this need. 

Discussion: We agree that assessing 

the vocational strengths and service 

needs of individuals who are deaf 

requires special training. Nothing in this 

priority would prevent an applicant 

from proposing vocational evaluation 

coursework to teach the skills needed to 

accurately assess the vocational 

strengths and service needs of 

individuals who are deaf. Such 

coursework would fit squarely within 

the training programs the priority is 

designed to support. We expect that the 

peer review process will reward 

applicants that address this issue. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: Several commenters 

suggested that, as tuition and other costs 

increase, grants funded under this 

priority should receive more funding. 

These commenters indicated that 

institutions of higher education may be 

discouraged from applying if grants are 

not funded at higher level. 

Discussion: We recognize that higher 

education is becoming more expensive 

for students every year. As a result, 

scholarship support may be available to 

fewer students or cover a smaller 

proportion of their overall tuition and 

fees. However, we do not typically set 

out funding levels in our priorities. The 

Department retains the authority to 

increase maximum award sizes in future 

years under this program in a notice 

inviting applications, if we deem it 

appropriate. 

Changes: None. 

Final Priority 

Rehabilitation Specialty Areas 

The Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

announces a priority to fund programs 

leading to a master’s degree or 

certificate in one of nine specialty areas: 

(1) Rehabilitation Administration; (2) 

Rehabilitation Technology; (3) 

Vocational Evaluation and Work 

Adjustment; (4) Rehabilitation of 

Individuals Who Are Mentally Ill; (5) 

Rehabilitation Psychology; (6) 

Specialized Personnel for Rehabilitation 

of Individuals Who Are Blind or Have 

Vision Impairments; (7) Rehabilitation 

of Individuals Who Are Deaf or Hard of 

Hearing; (8) Job Development and Job 

Placement Services; and (9) 

Comprehensive System of Personnel 

Development. The goal of this priority is 

to increase the skills of scholars in these 

rehabilitation specialty areas so that, 

upon successful completion of their 

master’s degree or certificate programs, 

they are prepared to effectively meet the 

needs and demands of consumers with 

disabilities. 

Under this priority, applicants must: 

(a) Provide data on the current and 

projected employment needs and 

personnel shortages in the specialty area 

in State VR agencies and other related 

agencies as defined in 34 CFR 386.4 in 

their local area, region, and State, and 

describe how the proposed program will 

address those employment needs and 

personnel shortages. 

(b) Describe how the proposed 

program will provide rehabilitation 

professionals with the skills and 

knowledge that will help ensure that the 

individuals with disabilities whom they 

serve can meet current demands and 

emerging trends in the labor market, 

including how: 

(1) The curriculum provides a breadth 

of knowledge, experience, and rigor that 

will adequately prepare scholars to meet 

the employment needs and goals of VR 

consumers and aligns with evidencebased and competency-based practices 

in the rehabilitation specialty area; 

(2) The curriculum prepares scholars 

to meet all applicable certification 

standards; 

(3) The curriculum addresses new or 

emerging consumer needs or trends at 

the national, State, and regional levels 

in the rehabilitation specialty area; 

(4) The curriculum teaches scholars to 

address the needs of individuals with 

disabilities who are from diverse 

cultural backgrounds; 

(5) The curriculum trains scholars to 

assess the assistive technology needs of 

consumers, identify the most 

appropriate assistive technology 

services and devices for assisting 

consumers to obtain and retain 

employment, and train consumers to 

use such technology; 

(6) The curriculum teaches scholars to 

work with employers effectively in 

today’s economy, including by teaching 

strategies for developing relationships 

with employers in their State and local 

areas, identifying employer needs and 

skill demands, making initial employer 

contacts, presenting job-ready clients to 

potential employers, and conducting 

follow-up with employers; and 

(7) The latest technology is 

incorporated into the methods of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

42682 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

instruction (e.g., the use of distance 

education to reach scholars who live far 

from the university and the use of 

technology to acquire labor market 

information). 

(c) Describe their methods to: 

(1) Recruit highly capable prospective 

scholars who have the potential to 

successfully complete the academic 

program, all required practicum and 

internship experiences, and the required 

service obligation; 

(2) Educate potential scholars about 

the terms and conditions of the service 

obligation under 34 CFR 386.4, 386.34, 

and 386.40 through 386.43 so that they 

will be fully informed before accepting 

a scholarship; 

(3) Maintain a system that ensures 

that scholars sign a payback agreement 

and an exit form when they exit the 

program, regardless of whether they 

drop out, are removed, or successfully 

complete the program; 

(4) Provide academic support and 

counseling to scholars throughout the 

course of the academic program to 

ensure successful completion; 

(5) Ensure that all scholars complete 

an internship in a State VR agency or a 

related agency as a requirement for 

completion of a program leading to a 

master’s degree. The internship must be 

in a State VR agency unless the VR 

agency does not directly perform work 

related to the scholar’s course of study 

or an applicant can provide sufficient 

justification that it is not feasible for all 

students receiving scholarships to 

complete an internship in a State VR 

agency. In such cases, the applicant may 

require scholars to complete an 

internship in a related agency, as 

defined in 34 CFR 386.4. Circumstances 

that would constitute sufficient 

justification may include, but are not 

limited to, a lack of capacity at the State 

VR agency to provide adequate 

supervision of scholars during their 

internship experience and the physical 

distance between scholars and the 

nearest office of the State VR agency 

(e.g., for scholars enrolled in distancelearning programs or at rural 

institutions). Applicants should include 

a written justification in the application 

or provide it to RSA for review and 

approval by the appropriate RSA Project 

Officer no later than 30 days prior to a 

scholar beginning an internship in a 

related agency. For applicants proposing 

a certificate program, the requirement 

for an internship in a State VR agency 

or a related agency is waived unless the 

certificate program has an internship 

requirement. 

(6) Provide career counseling, 

including informing scholars of 

professional contacts and networks, job 

leads, and other necessary resources and 

information to support scholars in 

successfully obtaining and retaining 

qualifying employment; 

(7) Maintain regular contact with 

scholars upon successful program 

completion to ensure that they have 

support during their search for 

qualifying employment as well as 

support during the initial months of 

their employment (e.g., by matching 

scholars with mentors in the field); 

(8) Maintain regular communication 

with scholars after program exit to 

ensure that their contact information is 

current and that documentation of 

employment is accurate and meets the 

regulatory requirements for qualifying 

employment; and 

(9) Maintain accurate information on, 

while safeguarding the privacy of, 

current and former scholars from the 

time they are enrolled in the program 

until they successfully meet their 

service obligation. 

(d) Describe a plan for developing and 

maintaining partnerships with State VR 

agencies and community-based 

rehabilitation service providers that 

includes: 

(1) Coordination between the grantee 

and the State VR agencies and 

community-based rehabilitation service 

providers that will promote qualifying 

employment opportunities for scholars 

and formalized on-boarding and 

induction experiences for new hires; 

(2) Formal opportunities for scholars 

to obtain work experiences through 

internships, practicum agreements, job 

shadowing, and mentoring 

opportunities; and 

(3) When applicable, a scholar 

internship assessment tool that is 

developed to ensure a consistent 

approach to the evaluation of scholars 

in a particular program. The tool should 

reflect the specific responsibilities of the 

scholar during the internship. The 

grantee and worksite supervisor are 

encouraged to work together as they see 

fit to develop the assessment tool. 

Supervisors at the internship site will 

complete the assessment detailing the 

scholar’s strengths and areas for 

improvement that must be addressed 

and provide the results of the 

assessment to the grantee. The grantee 

should ensure that (i) scholars are 

provided with a copy of the assessment 

and all relevant rubrics prior to 

beginning their internship, (ii) 

supervisors have sufficient technical 

support to accurately complete the 

assessment, and (iii) scholars receive a 

copy of the results of the assessment 

within 90 days of the end of their 

internship. 

(e) Describe how scholars will be 

evaluated throughout the entire program 

to ensure that they are proficient in 

meeting the needs and demands of 

today’s consumers and employers, 

including the steps that will be taken to 

provide assistance to a scholar who is 

not meeting academic standards or who 

is performing poorly in a practicum or 

internship setting. 

(f) Describe how the program will be 

evaluated. Such a description must 

include: 

(1) How the program will determine 

its effect over a period of time on filling 

vacancies in the State VR agency with 

qualified rehabilitation professionals 

capable of providing quality services to 

consumers; 

(2) How input from State VR agencies 

and community-based rehabilitation 

service providers will be included in the 

evaluation; 

(3) How feedback from consumers of 

VR services and employers (including 

the assessments described in paragraph 

(d)(3)) will be included in the 

evaluation; 

(4) How data from other sources, such 

as those from the Department on the 

State VR program, will be included in 

the evaluation; and 

(5) How the data and results from the 

evaluation will be used to make 

necessary adjustments and 

improvements to the program. 

Types of Priorities 

When inviting applications for a 

competition using one or more 

priorities, we designate the type of each 

priority as absolute, competitive 

preference, or invitational through a 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

effect of each type of priority follows: 

Absolute priority: Under an absolute 

priority, we consider only applications 

that meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(3)). 

Competitive preference priority: 

Under a competitive preference priority, 

we give competitive preference to an 

application by (1) awarding additional 

points, depending on the extent to 

which the application meets the priority 

(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting 

an application that meets the priority 

over an application of comparable merit 

that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(ii)). 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

This notice does not preclude us from 

proposing additional priorities, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 141 / Wednesday, July 23, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 42683 

requirements, definitions, or selection 

criteria, subject to meeting applicable 

rulemaking requirements. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use this priority, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register. 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Regulatory Impact Analysis 

Under Executive Order 12866, the 

Secretary must determine whether this 

regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, 

therefore, subject to the requirements of 

the Executive order and subject to 

review by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive 

Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ as an action likely to 

result in a rule that may— 

(1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, or 

adversely affect a sector of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, the 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local, or tribal governments or 

communities in a material way (also 

referred to as an ‘‘economically 

significant’’ rule); 

(2) Create serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary 

impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, 

or loan programs or the rights and 

obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

stated in the Executive order. 

This final regulatory action is not a 

significant regulatory action subject to 

review by OMB under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866. 

We have also reviewed this final 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

13563, which supplements and 

explicitly reaffirms the principles, 

structures, and definitions governing 

regulatory review established in 

Executive Order 12866. To the extent 

permitted by law, Executive Order 

13563 requires that an agency— 

(1) Propose or adopt regulations only 

upon a reasoned determination that 

their benefits justify their costs 

(recognizing that some benefits and 

costs are difficult to quantify); 

(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the 

least burden on society, consistent with 

obtaining regulatory objectives and 

taking into account—among other things 

and to the extent practicable—the costs 

of cumulative regulations; 

(3) In choosing among alternative 

regulatory approaches, select those 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety, 

and other advantages; distributive 

impacts; and equity); 

(4) To the extent feasible, specify 

performance objectives, rather than the 

behavior or manner of compliance a 

regulated entity must adopt; and 

(5) Identify and assess available 

alternatives to direct regulation, 

including economic incentives—such as 

user fees or marketable permits—to 

encourage the desired behavior, or 

provide information that enables the 

public to make choices. 

Executive Order 13563 also requires 

an agency ‘‘to use the best available 

techniques to quantify anticipated 

present and future benefits and costs as 

accurately as possible.’’ The Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs of 

OMB has emphasized that these 

techniques may include ‘‘identifying 

changing future compliance costs that 

might result from technological 

innovation or anticipated behavioral 

changes.’’ 

We are issuing this final priority only 

on a reasoned determination that its 

benefits justify its costs. In choosing 

among alternative regulatory 

approaches, we selected those 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

Based on the analysis that follows, the 

Department believes that this regulatory 

action is consistent with the principles 

in Executive Order 13563. 

We also have determined that this 

regulatory action does not unduly 

interfere with State, local, and tribal 

governments in the exercise of their 

governmental functions. 

In accordance with both Executive 

orders, the Department has assessed the 

potential costs and benefits, both 

quantitative and qualitative, of this 

regulatory action. The potential costs 

are those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering the Department’s 

programs and activities. The benefits of 

the Rehabilitation Long-Term Training 

program have been well established 

over the years through the successful 

completion of similar projects. Grants to 

provide funding for scholars to acquire 

master’s degrees and certificates in the 

rehabilitation specialty areas listed in 

this notice are needed to ensure that 

State VR agencies and related agencies 

have a supply of qualified rehabilitation 

professionals with the skills to help 

individuals with disabilities to achieve 

employment in today’s economy. 

Intergovernmental Review: This 

program is subject to Executive Order 

12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR 

part 79. One of the objectives of the 

Executive order is to foster an 

intergovernmental partnership and a 

strengthened federalism. The Executive 

order relies on processes developed by 

State and local governments for 

coordination and review of proposed 

Federal financial assistance. 

This document provides early 

notification of our specific plans and 

actions for this program. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) by 

contacting the Grants and Contracts 

Services Team, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 

20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245– 

7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call 

the FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: July 18, 2014. 

Melody Musgrove, 

Director, Office for Special Education 

Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–17370 Filed 7–22–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2014–0333; FRL–9914–11– 

OAR] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Washington: 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES