alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Priority Area 1 Priority Area 2 Priority Area 3

SHIP AAA ADRC

Alabama $ 263,781 $ 146,203 $ 93,830

Alaska $ 31,901 $ 17,690 $ 8,311

Arizona $ 215,245 $ 119,240 $ 110,813

Arkansas $ 243,666 $ 135,083 $ 57,524

California $ 995,650 $ 551,218 $ 168,519

Colorado $ 130,905 $ 72,544 $ 77,148

Connecticut $ 94,772 $ 52,483 $ 61,049

Delaware $ 42,805 $ 23,730 $ 17,610

DC $ 15,120 $ 8,368 $ -

Florida $ 736,775 $ 408,018 $ 392,453

Georgia $ 409,829 $ 227,188 $ 148,323

Hawaii $ 69,263 $ 38,386 $ 23,864

Idaho $ 94,939 $ 52,660 $ 27,634

Illinois $ 413,555 $ 229,153 $ 200,667

Indiana $ 286,990 $ 159,072 $ 111,788

Iowa $ 177,899 $ 98,685 $ 55,608

Kansas $ 125,196 $ 69,441 $ 47,316

Kentucky $ 314,607 $ 174,469 $ 83,603

Louisiana $ 220,081 $ 121,948 $ 77,305

Maine $ 105,212 $ 58,370 $ 29,750

Maryland $ 139,546 $ 77,292 $ 90,792

Massachusetts $ 203,415 $ 112,632 $ 118,468

Michigan $ 373,290 $ 206,885 $ 171,668

Minnesota $ 219,936 $ 121,946 $ 89,009

Mississippi $ 224,624 $ 124,573 $ 54,258

Missouri $ 300,271 $ 166,470 $ 6,798

Montana $ 71,664 $ 39,757 $ 14,026

Nebraska $ 88,656 $ 49,178 $ 30,523

Nevada $ 84,637 $ 46,883 $ 44,395

New Hampshire $ 66,787 $ 37,046 $ 25,984

New Jersey $ 198,715 $ 109,980 $ 144,930

New Mexico $ 106,796 $ 59,208 $ 36,409

New York $ 713,283 $ 394,982 $ 324,475

North Carolina $ 518,648 $ 287,487 $ 108,953

North Dakota $ 34,858 $ - $ -

Ohio $ 442,041 $ 244,948 $ 209,090

Oklahoma $ 189,985 $ 105,346 $ 65,757

Oregon $ 164,406 $ 91,161 $ 73,778

Pennsylvania $ 506,462 $ 280,603 $ 245,311

Rhode Island $ 30,346 $ 16,795 $ 19,702

South Carolina $ 264,018 $ 146,323 $ 91,847

South Dakota $ 49,872 $ 27,669 $ 15,226

Tennessee $ 363,083 $ 201,269 $ 119,913

Texas $ 807,663 $ 447,459 $ 355,168

Utah $ 75,732 $ 41,985 $ 31,599

Vermont $ 49,994 $ 27,739 $ 12,815

Virginia $ 306,490 $ 169,890 $ 131,518

Washington $ 205,219 $ 113,754 $ 116,556

West Virginia $ 148,031 $ 82,096 $ 40,251

Wisconsin $ 241,269 $ 133,798 $ 102,328

Wyoming $ 33,627 $ - $ -

Puerto Rico $ 19,710 $ 10,871 $ -

Total $ 12,231,265 $ 6,739,974 $ 4,684,662

MIPPA State Awards by Priority Area

Fiscal Year 2018
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-3152 

MIGUEL P. PADERES, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

 Respondent. 

ON MOTION 

Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

 The Office of Personnel Management moves (1) to waive the requirements of 

Fed. Cir. R. 27(f), and (2) to dismiss, for lack of jurisdiction, Miguel P. Paderes' petition 

for review of the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CB-1205-

06-0019-U-1. Paderes has not responded. 

 Paderes sought an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). 

The Office of Personnel Management denied his application. Paderes appealed to the 

Board. In 1994, the Board affirmed the denial of benefits because Paderes was not 

covered by CSRS. In 1995, this court affirmed the decision of the Board. 

 In 2006, Paderes filed with the Board a request for review of an Office of 

Personnel Management regulation. The Board did not address the merits of his request 

for review of the regulation. Instead, on February 5, 2007, the Board denied the request 
for review as barred by res judicata. Paderes petitions this court for review of the 

Board’s 2007 decision. 

 In Delos Santos v. Office of Personnel Management, 289 F.3d 1382 (Fed. Cir. 

2002), we held that we do not have jurisdiction over a petition for review of a Board 

decision involving a request for review of a regulation if the Board denies review without 

addressing the merits of the request. Here, as in Delos Santos, the Board did not 

review the merits of the request to review the regulation. Thus, we do not have jurisdiction 

over the petition and it must be dismissed. 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motions are granted. The petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

 (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT 

 June 6, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

cc: Miguel P. Paderes 

 Michael J. Dierberg, Esq. 

s8 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 6, 2007 

2007-3152 - 2 -
**REPLICATION GRANT**

**Georgia**

**PLEASE CUSTOMIZE**

# Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI-2)

DATE: // 		PROGRAM/TRACK: 

CODE NUMBER: (The code number is used to track survey and assures the confidentiality of the respondents)

What is the second letter of your first name?........................... 

What are the two digits of the year of your birth date? ...........  

What are the two digits of the day of your birth date? ............. 

What is the last letter in your last name (if female use

maiden name) ............................................................................... 

The following items represent a series of excerpts from counseling sessions. Each excerpt begins with an expression by the client concerning some aspect of the situation he or she faces, followed by two possible helper responses to the client’s remark.

You are to rate each response in terms of how appropriate or inappropriate you feel the reply is to the client’s comment. In the blank, you should record a rating from –3 to +3, corresponding to the chart below.  Be sure to respond to each item and try not to leave any blanks.

SCORING FOR SIRI-2     

To score the revised Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI-2), simply compute the difference (taking into account the sign) between the respondent’s rating for a particular item and the mean rating assigned by the criterion group of experts, as indicated in the following table.  The total score on the SIRI-2, therefore, represents the total discrepancy between the individual and the panelist ratings across all items.  Item 14 proved to be psychometrically ambiguous in our validation study, and we therefore recommend its exclusion from the SIRI-2.  Unlike the original SIRI, whose scores range from 0-25, with larger scores representing greater degrees of competency, scores on the revised version span a much larger range, and represent degrees of variation from a hypothetically ideal score.  Therefore, larger scores represent less, not more, competence in recognizing facilitative responses to a suicidal individual.

Mean Ratings (and Standard Deviations) of Appropriateness of

Response Options in Items on the Suicide Intervention Response

Inventory Form 2 by Panel of Experts

1. Remember to not use question #14   

2. A lower total score indicates more competence in recognizing facilitative responses to a suicidal individual.  

Sources:

Validation for the SIRI-2 Inventory

Scoring Methodology 1: Suicide Intervention Response Inventory

Scoring methodology 2

5
```

[House Report 107-22]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-22

======================================================================

 
   PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 327, SMALL BUSINESS PAPERWORK 
                               RELIEF ACT

                                _______
                                

   March 14, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 89]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 89, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 327, the 
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act, under an open rule. The 
rule provides one hour of general debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Government Reform.
    The rule provides that it shall be in order to consider as 
an original bill for the purpose of amendment the amendment in 
the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record 
and numbered 1. The rule further provides that the amendment in 
the nature of a substitute shall be open for amendment by 
section.
    The rule allows the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 
to accord priority in recognition to Members who have 
preprinted their amendments in the Congressional Record. 
Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

                                  

```
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 
| **Parent**                         | ** ** | **Subsidiary**                     | ** ** | **Percent of Ownership** | ** ** | **State of  Incorporation or  Organization** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------|------------|
| First Ottawa  Bancshares, Inc.     |       | The First  National Bank of Ottawa |       | 100                      | %          | National Bank, Illinois                      |       |
| The First  National Bank of Ottawa |       | First Ottawa  Financial Corp.      |       | 100                      | %          | Delaware                                     |       |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.736 Oceanport Creek.

The drawspan for the New Jersey Transit Rail Operations Drawbridge, mile 8.4 near Oceanport, must open on signal from May 15 through September 15 between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m.; except that, the drawspan need not open 6 a.m. to 7:45 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m on weekdays, excluding all federal holidays except for Martin Luther King Day. The drawspan must open on signal upon four hours notice from May 15 through September 15 between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m., and from September 16 through May 14; except that, the drawspan need not be opened from 6 a.m. to 7:45 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on weekdays, excluding all federal holidays except for Martin Luther King Day. Public vessels of the United States must be passed as soon as possible at anytime.

[USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70311, Dec. 4, 2006]
#### Hazer Feinberg, respondent, *v.*Annie Feinberg, appellant.

[Submitted December 11th, 1906.

Decided February 2d, 1907.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey, whose opinion is reported in *59 Atl. Rep. 880.*

*Mr. John W.*Wescott, for the appellant.

*Mr. Andrew J. King,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Grey.

*For*affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenoi-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Died—15.

*For*reversal—None.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT MAY 31, 1997 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1997 AND
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED 
MAY 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000001761
<NAME> THE TRANZONIC COMPANIES 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,777,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,581,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 19,849,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,769,974
<PP&E>                                      19,145,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,288,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,226,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       998,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,026,951<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,288,635
<SALES>                                     37,312,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,312,328
<CGS>                                       24,617,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,399,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,906,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,047,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,859,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,859,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .0
<FN>
<F1>This figure includes $5,834,824 in additional paid in capital and $54,192,127
in retained earnings
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Combined Professional Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeff Spanier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.



August 10, 2002                             s/Jeff Spanier
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Jeff Spanier
                                            Chief Executive Officer
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Oregon Legislation for Women in Industry

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Miriam Theresa, 1886-1962. 						*Oregon Legislation for Women in Industry : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 90*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5398,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 110.73a Indian River at Sebastian, Fla.

Beginning at a point on the shoreline at latitude 27°49′40′′ N., longitude 80°28′26′′ W.; thence 060° to latitude 27°49′46′′ N., longitude 80°28′13′′ W.; thence 156° to latitude 27°49′31′′ N., longitude 80°28′05′′ W.; thence 242° to latitude 27°49′25′′ N., longitude 80°28′18′′ W.; thence northerly along the shoreline to the point of beginning.

Note:

This area is principally for use by commercial fishing vessels less than 65 feet in length.

[CGD 74-104, [40 FR 2689](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/40-FR-2689), Jan. 15, 1975]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-1262-003]

Take notice that on May 15, 2000, Monongahela Power Company, Potomac Edison Company and West Penn Power Company, doing business as Allegheny Power tendered for filing revisions to First Revised Sheet Nos. 215 through 223 filed with the Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 9, 2000. Protest will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13914  Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This Notice is published in accordance with authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs by 209 DM 8, and in accordance with the Act of August 15, 1953, 67 Stat. 586, 18 U.S.C. 1161, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in                         *Rice*                         v.                         *Rehner*, 463 U.S. 713 (1983). I certify that Resolution No. 058-99 and Resolution No. 074-99 of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians were duly adopted by the Stockbridge-Munsee Tribal Council on September 7, 1999 and November 2, 1999, respectively. These Amendments to the Stockbridge-Munsee Liquor Control Ordinance, published on December 11, 1992 (57 FR 58938) with an amendment on May 13, 1998 (63 FR 26621), regulate the issuance of licenses for the sale of alcohol beverages within buildings used for casinos, entertainment facilities, convenience stores, special outdoor events and restaurant-bar operations, including the sale of beer for consumption on the golf course owned and regulated by the Stockbridge-Munsee Community.                     

# DATES:

This Amendment is effective as of June 1, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jim D. James, Office of Tribal Services, 1849 C Street NW, MS 4660-MIB, Washington, DC 20240-4001; telephone (202) 208-4400. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The amendment to the Stockbridge-Munsee Liquor Control Ordinance shall read as follows:

Section 31.1 (A) “Licenses for the sale of alcohol beverages may be issued for sale of such beverages for casinos, entertainment facilities, convenience stores and restaurant-bar operations owned and regulated by the Stockbridge-Munsee Community. This license includes sales for special outdoor events and the sale of beer for consumption on the golf course.”

Dated: May 22, 2000. 

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00-13611 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

246 

CA 13-01157 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

CARL TROST AND JENNIFER TROST, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

ROCKINGHAM ESTATES, LLC AND FORBES HOMES, INC., 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

 

BROWN & KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (KATHLEEN T. FEROLETO OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

DEMPSEY & DEMPSEY, BUFFALO (EMILY G. CATALANO OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y.

Devlin, J.), entered April 17, 2013 in a personal injury action. The

order granted the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment

pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) and denied the cross motion of

defendants for summary judgment. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation to withdraw appeal

signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 20, 2014,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.279 Coffeepot Bayou.

The draw of the Snell Isle Boulevard bridge, mile 0.4 at St. Petersburg, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.