alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Ambac Assurance Corporation:


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report dated  February 27,
2004 on the consolidated financial statements of Ambac Assurance Corporation and
subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended  December 31, 2003,  which report appears in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Ambac  Financial  Group,  Inc.,  which was filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on March  15,  2004 in the  Form  10-K of
Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc. Our report refers to changes, in 2003,
in Ambac  Assurance  Corporation's  methods of accounting for variable  interest
entities and stock-based compensation.



New York, New York
March 29, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2



                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

                               UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of Patron  Systems,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with  respect to the report of the Company on
Form  10-QSB  for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31,  2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         1.       the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the   information   contained  in  the  10-QSB  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 21, 2007                      /S/ MARTIN T. JOHNSON
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Martin T. Johnson
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# Un ited S tates C ourt of A ppea ls For the Seventh Ci rcui

t Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 20, 2001 Be fore Hon. W ILL IAM J. BA UER, Circuit Judge Hon. MICHA

EL S. K AN NE, Circuit Judge Hon. IL AN A D IAM OND R

OVNER, Circuit Judge
No. 00-3306 ANTONIO GUERRERO,

Plaintiff- Appellant , v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attor ney General of the United Stat es, Defendant-Appellee
. Appeal from the Uni ted St ates District Court for the Northern Dis trict of I lli nois, Ea st er n Division. No. 98 C 864 Reb ecc a R. Pa

l l mey er, Judge
.

O R D E R
T he o pin io n o f t his c o ur t da t ed Ju ne 13 , 20 01 is hereby correct ed. On pa ge t hr ee , firs t full par agr aph, line six, t he word “chan ges” sh ould be “ch ances” . On page ten, l

in e twelve, the word “he” should be del

eted bef ore t he word “n

ei ther”.
*Times subject to change

330 C Street SW | Washington DC 20201 | (202) 401-4634 | ACL.GOV

Joint Meeting of the RAISE Family Caregiving and Supporting Grandparents 

Raising Grandchildren Advisory Councils

September 21, 2022; 12:30 pm – 4:30 pm, Eastern Time 

Agenda & Schedule* 

12:30 – 12:40 Welcome & Call to Order

Greg Link, ACL RAISE/SGRG Team

12:40 – 12:50 Roll call & Introductions

Cheryl Thompson, ACL RAISE/SGRG Team

12:50 – 12:55 Agenda Overview

Greg Link, ACL RAISE/SGRG Team

12:55 – 1:00 Introduction of the Secretary of HHS

Alison Barkoff

Acting Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Aging

Administration for Community Living (ACL)

1:00 – 1:15 Opening Remarks

Honorable Xavier Becerra

Secretary of Health and Human Services

1:15 – 1:20 Acknowledgement of Secretary’s Remarks

Alison Barkoff, ACL

1:20 – 2:30 Presentation of the National Strategy to Support Family 

Caregivers

Sarah Markel, ACL RAISE/SGRG Team

Dr. Casey Shillam, RAISE Council Co-Chair

Jaia Lent, SGRG Council Co-Chair

Dr. Ethelyn McQueen-Gibson, SGRG Council Co-Chair

Nancy Murray, RAISE Council Co-Chair

Dr. Alan Stevens, RAISE Council Co-Chair

Alison Barkoff, ACL
330 C Street SW | Washington DC 20201 | (202) 401-4634 | ACL.GOV

2:30 – 2:45 Break

2:45 – 3:00 Council Member Reflection & Discussion

Lori Stalbaum (Moderator), ACL RAISE/SGRG Team

3:00 – 3:45 Tools for Implementation & Technical Assistance

Rani Snyder, Vice President, John A. Hartford Foundation 

Wendy Fox-Grage, Senior Policy Advisor, National 

Association of State Health Policy 

Ana Beltran, Project Director, National Technical Assistance 

Center on Kinship & Grandfamilies, Generations United

3:45 – 4:00 Remarks from the White House Domestic Policy Council

Jessica Schubel

Director of the Affordable Care Act and Health Care

4:00 – 4:15 Acknowledgement of Outgoing Council Members

Alison Barkoff, ACL

4:15 – 4:30 Next Steps & Adjourn

Greg Link, ACL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,191
<INVENTORY>                                     59,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,376
<PP&E>                                         221,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,872
<BONDS>                                         82,344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                    (89,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,097
<SALES>                                        214,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,615
<CGS>                                          206,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,361
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.00)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12730 and <greek-i>12731]


Utah Disaster <greek-i>UT-00010

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Utah (FEMA-4011-
DR), dated 08/08/2011.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/18/2011 Through 07/16/2011.
    Effective Date: 08/08/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/07/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/08/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/08/2011, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Beaver, Box Elder, Cache, Daggett, Duchesne, Emery, 
Millard, Morgan, Piute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Summit, Tooele, 
Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Weber, and the Uintah and Ouray Indian 
Reservation.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.250
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 127306 
and for economic injury is 127316.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-20838 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[House Document 111-21]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

111th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 111-21

 
                      CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT
                   TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT OF TWO ENVIRONMENTAL CHAMBERS TO BE USED 
 TO TEST AUTOMOTIVE PARTS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE U.S. SPACE LAUNCH 
 INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT 
  TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM THIS EXPORT, WILL NOT 
  MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE 
   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512

    March 4, 2009.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with the provisions of section 1512 of the 
Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I hereby certify to the 
Congress that the export of two environmental chambers to be 
used to test automotive parts is not detrimental to the U.S. 
space launch industry, and that the material and equipment, 
including any indirect technical benefit that could be derived 
from this export, will not measurably improve the missile or 
space launch capabilities of the People's Republic of China.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, March 3, 2009.

                                  

```
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 349 

Honoring Vice President Albert Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental Panel 

on Climate Change for receiving the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of their efforts to promote understanding of the threats posed 

by global warming. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. OBAMA, 

Mr. LEAHY, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. HARKIN, 

Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. REED, Mr. DODD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. KOHL, Mr. 

NELSON of Florida, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. CASEY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Vice President Albert Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for receiving the 

2007 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of their efforts 

to promote understanding of the threats posed by global 

warming. 

Whereas the Norwegian Nobel Committee selected Vice President Albert Arnold (Al) Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as Nobel Peace 

Prize Laureates for 2007, acknowledging them ‘‘for their 

efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge 

about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundaVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:55 Oct 18, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR349.ATS SR349

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 349 ATS 

tions for the measures that are needed to counteract such 

change’’; 

Whereas the Nobel Committee found that Vice President 

Gore ‘‘became aware at an early stage of the climatic 

challenges the world is facing’’, and that his ‘‘strong 

commitment . . . has strengthened the struggle against climate change’’; 

Whereas the IPCC, according to the Nobel Committee, is 

composed of thousands of scientists and officials from 

more than 100 countries, has sponsored research and scientific collaboration over the last 2 decades and ‘‘has created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming’’; 

and 

Whereas the Nobel Committee stated that Vice President 

Gore ‘‘is probably the single individual who has done 

most to create greater worldwide understanding of the 

measures that need to be adopted’’ to combat global 

warming: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors Vice President Al2 bert Arnold Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental Panel 

3 on Climate Change for receiving the 2007 Nobel Peace 

4 Prize, in recognition of their longstanding efforts to pro5 mote understanding of the threats posed by global warm6 ing. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8434

PAUL WALLACE, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; ROBERT KOPPEL, Respondents - Appellees,

and

JOHN A. ROWLEY, Respondent,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:07-cv-03406-CCB)

Submitted: July 29, 2009 Decided: August 11, 2009

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul Wallace seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wallace has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6392

ROOSEVELT BROOKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-04-283)

Submitted: May 13, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Bryan Rigney, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, P.L.C., Norfolk,

Virginia, for Appellant. Josephine Frances Whalen, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Brooks has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Brooks’ motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Carroll

No. 7140

#### State of New Hampshire v. Robert Church

September 30, 1975

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *James L. Kruse,*attorney *(Mr. Kruse*orally), for the State.

*William P. Shea,*by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Per curiam.

This appeal challenges the sentence imposed on the defendant on the ground that it is more severe than the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge, *Perkins,*J., on a defendant convicted of a similar crime in an unrelated case. Church was convicted of committing unnatural and lascivious acts with a sixteen-year-old boy in violation of RSA 579:9. This conviction was sustained on appeal. *State v. Church,*113 N.H. 692, 313 A.2d 727 (1973). The superior court then held a hearing, received evidence, and imposed a sentence of not more than three years or less then eighteen months in the New Hampshire State Prison. Four days previously the same judge had sentenced a defendant who had pleaded guilty to a charge of violating RSA 632:2 (Deviate Sexual Relations). That defendant received a sentence of twelve months in the county house of correction, nine months to be suspended, and three years on probation, with conditions attached regarding treatment by the county mental health service and the possibility of extending the probation period. The only connection between the two defendants or between their crimes is that they were sentenced by the same judge for similar offenses. The defendant in this case learned of the sentence in the other case shortly after receiving his sentence. He immediately filed a motion that his sentence be vacated and that he “be accorded the *538same sentence imposed upon the defendant” in the other case. The motion emphasized that the victim in the other case was six years old, with the inference that that crime was more serious. The superior court heard argument on and denied the motion, and reserved and transferred the defendant’s exception.

The defendant’s contention is simply that all persons convicted of a particular crime must receive the same sentence. This has never been the law. Even if the crimes were identical, the defendants may not be. *State v. Streeter,*113 N.H. 402, 308 A.2d 535 (1973). Implicit in the defendant’s argument is a challenge to the fairness of his sentence considered by itself. This challenge may be addressed to the review division of the superior court. RSA 651:57 *et seq.;*Laws 1975, ch. 267. RSA 651:58 I requires applications for review of sentence to be filed within thirty days after sentencing, except for good cause shown. Such cause exists here because having seasonably pursued his pending appeal the defendant should now be entitled to apply to the review division. Therefore this appeal is dismissed to allow the defendant to pursue his statutory remedy.

*Dismissed without prejudice.*
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 
| **Parent**                         | ** ** | **Subsidiary**                    | ** ** | **Percent of Ownership** | ** ** | **State of   Incorporation or   Organization** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| First Ottawa Bancshares, Inc. |       | The First National Bank of Ottawa |       | 100                                | %          | National Bank, Illinois                                            |       |
| The First National Bank of Ottawa  |       | First Ottawa Financial Corp.      |       | 100                                | %          | Delaware                                                           |       |

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Standard and Scheduled Hours of Work for Women in Industry: A Study Based on Hour Data From 13 States

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Standard and Scheduled Hours of Work for Women in Industry: A Study Based on Hour Data From 13 States : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 43*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1925,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5361,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER