alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 349 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 349

  Honoring Vice President Albert Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental 
 Panel on Climate Change for receiving the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, in 
 recognition of their efforts to promote understanding of the threats 
                        posed by global warming.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2007

 Mr. Reid (for himself, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Obama, 
  Mr. Leahy, Mr. Biden, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
 Schumer, Mr. Reed, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Nelson of 
  Florida, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. Casey) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring Vice President Albert Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental 
 Panel on Climate Change for receiving the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, in 
 recognition of their efforts to promote understanding of the threats 
                        posed by global warming.

Whereas the Norwegian Nobel Committee selected Vice President Albert Arnold (Al) 
        Gore, Jr., and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as 
        Nobel Peace Prize Laureates for 2007, acknowledging them ``for their 
        efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made 
        climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are 
        needed to counteract such change'';
Whereas the Nobel Committee found that Vice President Gore ``became aware at an 
        early stage of the climatic challenges the world is facing'', and that 
        his ``strong commitment ... has strengthened the struggle against 
        climate change'';
Whereas the IPCC, according to the Nobel Committee, is composed of thousands of 
        scientists and officials from more than 100 countries, has sponsored 
        research and scientific collaboration over the last 2 decades and ``has 
        created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between 
        human activities and global warming''; and
Whereas the Nobel Committee stated that Vice President Gore ``is probably the 
        single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide 
        understanding of the measures that need to be adopted'' to combat global 
        warming: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors Vice President Albert Arnold Gore, 
Jr., and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for receiving 
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of their longstanding 
efforts to promote understanding of the threats posed by global 
warming.
                                 <all>
```
OIL CROPS OUTLOOK PDF Format
APRIL 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This report is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831.  A summary in ASCII format was
released on April 12, 1999

Electronic release only; no printed copies are available

Please note that this publication is in .PDF format and 23.1KB in size.
Acrobat Reader 3.0 or later is required to view and print this document.
The Adobe Acrobat .PDF format is used to preserve all the layout and
content used in the original publication. To download and get help using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, please go to:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

For More Information on ERS Publications and Data
*************************************************
Visit the ERS web site at:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov

Other reports are available from the Products and Services
area on the ERS web site from:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/periodic.htm

For sales information on ERS publications, go to:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/sales.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
END_OF_FILE
#### § 110.72d Ashley River, SC.

All waters on the southwest portion of the Ashley River encompassed within the following points: Beginning at latitude 32°46′40′′ N, longitude 79°57′27′′ W; thence continuing north-northeasterly to latitude 32°46′44′′ N, longitude 79°57′25′′ W; thence continuing southeasterly to latitude 32°46′40′′ N, longitude 79°57′22′′ W; thence continuing southeasterly to latitude 32°46′27′′ N, longitude 79°57′03′′ W; thence continuing west-southwesterly to latitude 32°46′25′′ N, longitude 79°57′09′′ W; thence continuing northwesterly to the beginning point at latitude 32°46′40′′ N, longitude 79°57′27′′ W. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.

[USCG-2013-0819, 79 FR 62570, Oct. 20, 2014]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 E0 04 4 . MATTHEW S v . BUTLER.

Up o n co n si d erat i o n , ap p l i can t’ s em erg en cy m o t i o n fo r an ex t en s i o n o f t i m e in
wh i ch t o fi l e a d i s cret i o n ary ap p l i cat i o n i s GRANTED. Ap p l i can t s h al l h av e u n t i l

M ay 2 4 , 2 0 2 1 , t o fi l e t h e ap p l i cat i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## May 05, 2021

05/05/2021
**1998In order to supply data users with current information between issues of Oil Crops Situation and Outlook report, ERS is now issuing monthly datatables.  These will be issued on:February 12, March 13, June 15, September 14, October 13 and December 14.To access these reports, click here.-  Oil Crops Update, 12.14.98  Oil Crops Outlook, 11.12.98Oil Crops Outlook, 08.13.98
-  Oil Crops Outlook, 07.13.98  Oil Crops outlook update, 06.15.98 [Spreadsheet 11kB]Oil Crops Outlook, 05.13.98
-  Oil Crops Outlook, 04.10.98Oil Crops Outlook, 01.14.98

**
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133552 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133552 COA: 266085 Wayne CC: 05-002226-01 DUQUAN ABRAM HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
§ 110.189a Key West Harbor, Key West, Fla., naval explosives anchorage area. ( a ) *The anchorage ground.* A circular area with its center at latitude 24°30′50.6′′, longitude 81°50′31.6′′ with a radius of 300 yards, for use for ammunition exceeding the prescribed limits for pier-side handling.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) When occupied by a vessel handling explosives, no other vessel may enter the area unless authorized by the enforcing agency.
( 2 ) Only one vessel handling explosives may anchor in the area at one time.
( 3 ) No more than 300,000 pounds net of high explosives or equivalent may be handled in the area at any one time.
( 4 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, U.S. Naval Base, Key West, Fla., and any other agencies he may designate.
#### The Centenary Fund and Preachers' Aid Society of the New Jersey Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, trustee, under the last will and testament of Ezra B. Lake, deceased, v. Martha H. Lake et al.

[Submitted March 25th, 1907.

Decided March 29th, 1907.]

1. The provision in a will, “I do hereby will and bequeath unto * * * all my real estate and personal property not disposed of in some other way,” carries the legal title to the real estate referred to, since the word “bequeath,” when expressly applied to real estate, is equivalent to the word “devise,” and under *8 Gen. Stat. p. 3168*§ *85,*words of inheritance are made unnecessary.

2. Where an absolute power of sale is given in a will, no condition subsequent or limitation in trust can be held operative against a title emanating under a proper exercise of the power, since the power of sale *ex proprio vigore*subordinates the condition.

On bill for the construction of the will of Ezra B. Lake. Heard on bill, answer, replication and proofs.

*Mr. S. Stanger Iszard,*for the complainant.

*Messrs. Bleakly & Slockwell,*for the defendants.

Leaming, Y. 0.

I find no uncertain features touching this will. The intention of the testator appears to me to be clearly manifest throughout.

The expression, “I do hereby will and bequeath unto * * * all of my real estate and personal property not disposed of in some other way,” carries the legal title to the real estate referred to. The word “bequeath,” when expressly applied to real estate, is uniformly treated as the equivalent to the word “devise,” and *809words of inheritance are made unnecessary by *3 Gen. Stat. p. 3763*§ *35.*

The apprehensions which appear to have arisen by reason of the forfeiture clauses contained in the will are equally groundless. It is entirely immaterial whether these clauses be treated as conditions subsequent or as limitations in trust, for where an absolute power of sale is given no condition subsequent can be held operative against a title emanating under a proper exercise of the power. An intention upon the part of testator to authorize a sale subject to conditions subsequent is an impossible conception. The power of sale *ex proprio vigore*subordinates the condition.

The power of sale is equally clear. 'Testator expressly authorizes the sale of real estate when there is insufficient cash on hand to pay the fixed charges. The testator also clearly expresses his purpose that the proceeds of sales of real estate shall be preserved intact, except as to the temporary use of such proceeds in anticipation of revenues to be received from other sources to supply the proceeds thus temporarily used. To comply with this requirement it is now manifestly necessary to sell all the real estate in order that its value may be made revenue producing, and thus afford a fund from which the fixed charges can be paid.

I entertain no doubt as to the power to sell the entire real estate at either public or private sale, and to confer an absolute title upon the purchasers.
Order 2013

- 9

- 5

Issued: September 5, 2013



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 5 th day of September, 2013

ORDER ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION

By Order 2013

- 6

- 13, issued on June 12, 2013, the Department terminated the eligibility of

Lewistown and Miles City, M ontana , under the Essential Air Service program. On July 2, 2013,

each communit y filed a petition for reconsideration of that Order . On August 22 and 28 , 2013,

respectively, Lewistown and Miles City filed a motion to withdraw its petition for

reconsideration.

By this O rder, the Department grants the motion s submitted by the cities of Lewistown and

Miles City, Montana

.

T his O rder is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.25a(b)

.

ACCORDINGLY,

1

. We grant the motion s to withdraw the petitions for reconsideration of Order 2013

- 6

- 13,

submitted by of the cities of Lewistown and Miles City, Montana ;

2

. This docket will remain open until further order of the Department; and

Essential Air Service at

LEWISTOWN, MONTANA

MILES CITY, MONTANA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. D ocket DOT

- OST

- 1997

- 26052

3

. W e wil l serve copies of this O rder on the parties listed in Appendix A

.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary

for Aviation and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.govAppendix A

SERVICE LIST

MR KEVIN MYHRE

CITY MANAGER

305 WEST WATSON

LEWISTOWN MT 59457 MR MICKEY BOWMAN

SILVER AIRWAYS

1100 LEE WAGENER BLVD

SUITE 201

FT LAUDERDALE FL 33315

MBOWMAN@GOSILVER.COM

MR CHRIS A GRENZ

MAYOR

CITY OF MILES CITY

PO BOX 910

MILES CITY MT 59301

- 0910 MONTANA DOT

2701 PROSPECT AVENUE

HELENA MT 59601
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Consistent With 
Departmental Policy, 28 CFR

    50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in 
United States v. Robert Odabashian, et al. was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on May 18, 
2000 (95-2361 G/Bre). On November 5, 1995, the United States filed a 
First Amended Complaint pursuant to Section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
(``CERCLA''), as amended, against five defendants. The First Amended 
Complaint alleges that the defendants are liable under Section 107 of 
CERCLA for costs incurred by the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency during a cleanup of the Pulvair Corporation Superfund Site in 
Millington, Tennessee. Subsequently, defendants filed various third-
party complaints seeking contribution from various third-party 
defendants. The proposed Consent Decree settles the liability of 
Kincaid Enterprises, Inc., one of the defendants named in the November 
5, 1995 Complaint. Under the Consent Decree, the Settlor agrees to 
reimburse the United States in the amount of $400,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044; and 
refer to United States v. Robert Odabashian, et al., DOJ Ref. #90-11-3-
1474.
    The proposed settlement agreement may be examined at the Office of 
the United States Attorney, Suite 410, 200 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, 
TN 38103, and at the office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Atlanta, GA 30303. A copy of the 
proposed Consent Decree may be obtained by mail from the Department of 
Justice Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $5.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-13906 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting cancellation.

# SUMMARY:

The White Pine-Nye Resource Advisory Committee meeting scheduled in Eureka, Nevada has been cancelled. The committee is authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) (the Act) and operates in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the committee is to improve collaborative relationships and to provide advice and recommendations to the Forest Service concerning projects and funding consistent with the title II of the Act.

      ( print page 48801)    

# DATES:

The cancelled meeting was scheduled to be held August 8, 2011, 9 a.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Steven Williams, RAC Designated Federal Official, Austin Ranger District, 100 Midas Canyon Road, P.O. Box 130, Austin, Nevada 89310, 775-964-2671, e-mail                         *swilliams01@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: August 2, 2011.

JoEllen J. Keil,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-20087 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-2054

LT Case No. 2019-CF-951-A

_____________________________

LAMATHIS EUGENE HAMILTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County.

Willard Pope, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Natalie R. Gossett,

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean 

Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCES TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,623
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,158
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   585,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (70,142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 524,158
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,403
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               (0)
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                194,948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (207,351)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (207,351)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (207,351)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.69)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Cuidado con estafadores que se hacen 

pasar por empleados del Seguro Social

A qué prestar atención

La persona que llama dice que 

hay un problema con su número 

de Seguro Social o cuenta. 

Cualquier persona que llama 

pidiéndole que pague una 

multa o deuda con tarjetas de 

regalo (gift cards), efectivo, 

transferencias bancarias o 

tarjetas de débito prepagas.

Los estafadores fingen ser 

empleados del Seguro Social u 

otra agencia gubernamental. El 

identificador de llamadas o los 

documentos enviados por correo 

electrónico pueden parecer 

oficiales, pero no lo son.

Las personas que llaman lo 

amenazan con arrestarlo u 

otra acción legal.

Esté alerta Permanezca activo

¡Protéjase y proteja a sus familiares 

y amigos! 

» Si recibe una llamada 

sospechosa, simplemente 

cuelgue e informe la llamada en 

oig.ssa.gov/espanol/reportar

» Obtenga más información en 

oig.ssa.gov/espanol

» Comparta esta información con otros

Social Security Administration | Publication No. 05-10539 | January 2020

Escrito y publicado con fondos de los contribuyentes de los EE. UU.

Los estafadores telefónicos están fingiendo ser empleados del 

gobierno. Pueden amenazarlo y exigir un pago inmediato para evitar 

el arresto u otra acción legal. ¡Que no lo engañen!

Si recibe una llamada sospechosa:

1. ¡CUELGUE!

2. ¡NO LES DÉ DINERO O INFORMACIÓN PERSONAL! 

3. REPORTE LA ESTAFA EN OIG.SSA.GOV/ESPANOL

El Seguro Social puede llamarlo en 

algunas situaciones, pero nunca para:

» Amenazarlo

» Suspender su número de 

Seguro Social

» Exigir un pago inmediato de usted

» Solicitar pago en efectivo, tarjeta 

de regalo, tarjeta de débito 

prepaga o transferencia bancaria