alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     UT
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
         FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED
         STATEMENTS OF INCOME, RETAINED EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS OF NEW
         ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
         REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>    0000071297
<NAME>   NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                                                     <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>              3,913,792
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              376,046
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                   473,483
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                 548,326                 <F1>
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5,311,647
<COMMON>                                    64,970
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                736,605
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                      954,518
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>         1,744,442                 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                               39,113                 <F2>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                   1,487,481
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           251,950
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             89,910
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>         1,698,751
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          5,311,647
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>              2,502,591
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                     152,024
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             1,983,706
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             2,135,730
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                  366,861
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (5,515)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>           361,346
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 122,342
<NET-INCOME>                             220,038
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                6,851                 <F2>
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>            220,038
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 152,812
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                107,311
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                   521,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              $3.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                              $3.39
<FN>
<F1>                                  Total deferred charges includes other assets.
<F2>                                  Preferred stock reflects preferred stock of subsidiaries.  Preferred
                                      stock dividends reflect preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries.
<F3>                                  Total common stockholders equity includes treasury stock at cost and
                                      unrealized gain on securities.
</FN>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0243 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRANDON LEE CRAFT,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court Reporter Sheena Jendro Cobb is granted an extension of time to and including December 2 3 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 27 2020

10/27/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0243
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Computer Program for the Computation of Running Gear Temperatures Using Green's FunctionA new technique has been developed to study two dimensional heat transfer problems in gears. This technique consists of transforming the heat equation into a line integral equation with the use of Green's theorem. The equation is then expressed in terms of eigenfunctions that satisfy the Helmholtz equation, and their corresponding eigenvalues for an arbitrarily shaped region of interest. The eigenfunction are obtalned by solving an intergral equation. Once the eigenfunctions are found, the temperature is expanded in terms of the eigenfunctions with unknown time dependent coefficients that can be solved by using Runge Kutta methods. The time integration is extremely efficient. Therefore, any changes in the time dependent coefficients or source terms in the boundary conditions do not impose a great computational burden on the user. The method is demonstrated by applying it to a sample gear tooth. Temperature histories at representative surface locatons are given.Document ID19970018108Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsKoshigoe, S.*(Gearesearch Associates Banning, CA United States)*Murdock, J. W.*(Gearesearch Associates Banning, CA United States)*Akin, L. S.*(Gearesearch Associates Banning, CA United States)*Townsend, D. P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1996Subject CategoryMathematical And Computer Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberAD-A318138E-10286NAS 1.15:107241ARL-TR-1117NASA-TM-107241Meeting InformationMeeting: Power Transmission and GearingLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: October 6, 1996End Date: October 9, 1996Accession Number97N20188Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-36PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-62211-A-47ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsGREENS FUNCTIONSHEAT TRANSFERCOMPUTER PROGRAMSAvailable DownloadsNameType19970018108.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00204-CR

DAVYEON BATISTE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1606616D)

March 9, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment 

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
03/09/201 0 16:3 3 FAX202493514 2 FA A * DM S @I001/00 1

U.S . DEPARTMEN

TO FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C , '-•''I f

FEDERA L AVIATION , INC . Complainan t vs . AI R CHARTER , INC , Responden t FA ADOCKE T NO . CP09SSO00 8 DM S NO . FAA-2009-010 0 Hon . Isaa c D . Benki n

MOTIO NT O DISMIS S APPEA L COME S NO WResponden t an d b yhi s undersigne d attorne ymove s fo r dismissa l o f Complainant' s appea l fo r failur e t o compl ywit hth e timel yfilin g requirement s o f 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.323(c) . RESPECTFULL YSUBMITTED . I n Guaynabo , P.R. , thi s 8"^ ^ da yo f March , 2010 . I certif ytha t befor e filin g th e above , a cop yhereo f wa s thi s da ymaile d wit hpostag e full yprepai d thereo n t o Geral d A . Ellis , Esq. , t o hi s addres s o f record . __ , _
GABRIE L I . PESAGARICAN O 12060 8 PM B 23 9 40 5 Ave . Esmeralda , Ste . 10 2 Guaynabo , P.R . 0096 9 287-9024 , Fax . 731-067 9 gipsl9340hotinail.co m
THE UNITED BUILDING, 77 WEST WACKER DRIVE, CHICAGO, IL 60601

DAN WEISS

MANAGING DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS & REGULATORY

(312) 997-7573

DAN.WEISS@COAIR.COM

February 1, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Applications of United and Spanair, Docket DOT-OST-2010-0055

Dear Mr. Gretch:

By Notice of Action Taken on April 6, 2010 in this docket, the Department 

granted Statements of Authorization and amended exemptions authorizing 

reciprocal code-share services by United and Spanair.1 Consistent with 

condition (c) in Appendix C of that notice, Continental and United notify the 

Department that they have terminated all code-share services with Spanair as a 

result of Spanair ceasing all services, effective January 27, 2012.

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International & Regulatory 

Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND

 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

cc: Robert Finamore

 Esta Rosenberg

 Mary Street

Michael Goldman

Julien Style

 

1 By Order 2011-3-14, the Department reissued this authority in the name of Continental, Continental 

Micronesia and Air Micronesia and/or United.
THE UNITED BUILDING, 77 WEST WACKER DRIVE, CHICAGO, IL 60601

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

howard_kass@usairways.com

john.allen@faa.gov

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

Annalei Avanceña 

International Regulatory Advisor

February 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2282

WILLIE EDWARD NICHOLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:22-cv-01665-MGL)

Submitted: April 11, 2024 Decided: April 15, 2024

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Edward Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Ellison F. McCoy, Frank Sanders Stern, 

JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2282 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Edward Nichols appeals the district court’s judgment entered in Defendant’s 

favor after the court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendations to grant Defendant’s 

motions (1) to dismiss Nichols’ claims of discrimination, in violation of the American with 

Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, and retaliation, in violation of the 

ADA, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e17, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634; 

and (2) for summary judgment on Nichols’ claims of race and sex discrimination, in 

violation of Title VII, sex discrimination, in violation of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. 

§ 206(d), age discrimination, in violation of the ADEA, and race, sex, and age 

discrimination, in violation of the South Carolina Human Affairs Law. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. Nichols v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA, Inc., No. 3:22-cv-01665-MGL (D.S.C. 

Nov. 13, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2282 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exh. 10.2  08JUN12 New CEO








Exhibit 10.2
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
A Delaware Corporation


First Amendment to Employment Agreement


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 12th day of June, 2012 by and between UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP., a Delaware Corporation, and any of its parent or subsidiary companies (collectively, the “Company”), and JOHN FORNEY (the “Executive”), whose residence address is 300 Rafael Blvd. NE, St. Petersburg, FL 33704.


Recitals


		
	A.
	The Parties entered into the Employment Agreement on June 8, 2012 whereby the Executive will be employed as the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company.


		
	B.
	The Employment Agreement provided that the effective date of Executive's employment with the Company was June 8, 2012.  


		
	C.
	The Parties wish to clarify that Executive will begin employment with the Company on June 14, 2012.


Agreement


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	The “Effective Date” as defined in the Employment Agreement shall be amended to reflect the date of June 14, 2012.  


2.In all other respects the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly signed by the parties hereto on the day and year first above written.
UNITED INSURANCE HOLDINGS CORP.
By:    /s/ Gregory C. Branch
Name:    Gregory C. Branch
Title:    Chairman
JOHN FORNEY
/s/ John Forney    






Notary Acknowledgement
#### § 780.819 Production must be of unrefined sugar or syrup.

The second part of the section 13(b)(15) exemption is specifically limited to the production “of sugar (other than refined sugar) or syrup.” The production of “refined sugar” a term which is commonly understood to refer to the refinement of “raw sugar” is expressly excluded. Thus, the exemption does not apply to the manufacture of sugar that is produced by melting sugar, purifying the melted sugar solution through a carbon medium process and the recrystallization of the sugar from this solution. Nor does the exemption apply to the processing of cane syrup into refined sugar or to the further processing of sugar, as for example, beet sugar into powdered or liquid sugar.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Compex Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report),
I, Dan W. Gladney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott
Youngstrom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Dan W. GladneyDan W. GladneyChief Executive Officer September 28, 2004 /s/ Scott P. YoungstromScott P. YoungstromChief Financial Officer September 28, 2004
### Ground-water resources of Cambodia

By: William Charles RasmussenGary M. Bradford

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1608P

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
ERS Autofax Document #12302

Oil Crops Outlook


Oil Crops Outlook/ June 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 4

Oil Crops Outlook/ June 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 6

Table 7--Peanuts: U.S. supply and disappearance

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Supply Disappearance 

 ------------------------- ----------------------------------------

Year 

begin. Beg. Im- Produc- Total Dom. Crush Seed& Ex- Total End.

Oct. 1 stocks ports tion Food resid. ports stocks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ----------------------- Million pounds---------------------------

1997/98 795 141 3,539 4,475 2,099 544 303 681 3,627 848

1998/99 2/ 848 152 3,963 4,964 2,150 630 334 600 3,714 1,250

1999/00 2/ 1,250 165 3,770 5,185 2,180 830 326 750 4,085 1,100

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1/ Estimated. 2/ Forecast.
Oil Crops Outlook/ June 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 7

Table 8--Oilseeds prices received by farmers, U.S.
Oil Crops Outlook/ June 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 8

Table 9--Vegetable oil prices

---------------------------------------------------

 Cotton- SunMarketing Soybean seed flower Peanut Corn 

 year oil2 oil3 oil4 oil5 oil6

---------------------------------------------------

 Cents/lb.

1991/92 19.10 22.83 21.63 27.30 25.82 

1992/93 21.40 30.07 25.37 27.40 20.90 

1993/94 27.00 30.30 31.08 43.20 26.38 

1994/95 27.51 29.23 28.10 44.30 26.47 

1995/96 24.70 26.53 25.40 40.30 25.24 

1996/97 22.50 25.58 22.64 43.70 24.05 

1997/98 25.80 28.85 27.00 49.00 28.94

 

1997/98

October 
Oil Crops Outlook/ June 1999

ERS Autofax Document #12302 9
1

Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants NESHAP- Confidential Business Information 

Documents

This list of files is provided as a reference only. The information contained in these files is Confidential 

Business Information and may not be viewed by anyone without specific clearance under the Clean Air 

Act.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated February 2010, 101 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated June 2010, 103 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated July 2010, 124 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated August 2010, 78 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated September 2010, 75 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated October 2010, 101 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated February 2010, 101 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated November 2010, 77 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 2, Dated December 2010, 77 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 1, Dated April 2010, 118 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 1, Dated August 2010, 103 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Potline 1, Dated December 2010, 49 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Stack 161 West, Dated January 2010, 58 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Stack 161 East, Dated February 2010, 61 pgs.

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Stack 162 East, Dated January 2010, 58 pgs.
2

Primary Aluminum Test Reports, Alcoa Primary Metals, Alcoa – Mt. Holly (operating as Alumax of SC). 

Emission Test Results, Stack 162 West, Dated January 2010, 43 pgs.
§ 105.120 Compliance documentation. Each facility owner or operator subject to this part must ensure that copies of the following documentation are available at the facility and are made available to the Coast Guard upon request: ( a ) The approved Facility Security Plan (FSP), as well as any approved revisions or amendments thereto, and a letter of approval from the COTP dated within the last 5 years;
( b ) The FSP submitted for approval and an acknowledgement letter from the COTP stating that the Coast Guard is currently reviewing the FSP submitted for approval, and that the facility may continue to operate so long as the facility remains in compliance with the submitted FSP; or
( c ) For facilities operating under a Coast Guard-approved Alternative Security Program as provided in § 105.140, a copy of the Alternative Security Program the facility is using, including a facility specific security assessment report generated under the Alternative Security Program, as specified in § 101.120(b)(3) of this subchapter, and a letter signed by the facility owner or operator, stating which Alternative Security Program the facility is using and certifying that the facility is in full compliance with that program.
[USCG-2003-14732, 68 FR 39322, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60541, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57712, Aug. 23, 2016]
#### § 780.505 Definition of “shade-grown tobacco.”

Shade-grown tobacco to which the exemption applies is Connecticut Valley Shade-Grown U.S. Type 61 and Georgia-Florida Shade-Grown U.S. Type 62.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTONIO BARBA DUENAS,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00022

- CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20100D02223)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY , 20 20

.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.