alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4557-N-22]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 2, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7488.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988                           ( print page 35383)                        court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD published a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: May 25, 2000.

Fred Karnas, Jr.,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 00-13610  Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
#### § 94.115 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

It will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 94.510(c). However, this part does not apply directly to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the drug-free workplace coverage currently is in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5).
----

----

I Tiedonantoja

Komissio

----

Euron kurssi (1)

17. syyskuuta 2004

(2004/C 233/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Lähde: Euroopan keskuspankin ilmoittama viitekurssi.

----

----

Ilmoitetun keskittymän vastustamatta jättäminen

(Asia COMP/M.3537 — BBVA/BNL)

(2004/C 233/02)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

Komissio päätti 20. elokuuta 2004 olla vastustamatta edellä mainittua keskittymää ja julistaa, että se soveltuu yhteismarkkinoille. Päätös perustuu neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 4064/89 6 artiklan 1 kohdan b alakohtaan. Päätöksen koko teksti on saatavissa vain italian kielellä, ja se julkistetaan sen jälkeen, kun siitä on poistettu kaikki sen mahdollisesti sisältämät liikesalaisuudet. Se on saatavissa:

----
#### § 810.530 Verification of labor value content compliance for producers subject to alternative staging regime.

The verification procedures outlined in this subpart apply to producers whether or not they are subject to the alternative staging regime, as outlined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Automotive Appendix.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24


                            Special Power of Attorney

        The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Cathy Souers her true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent will full power of substitution, for her
and in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments, including post-effective amendments, to this Form 10Q-SB, and to
file the same with all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting such
attorney-in-fact the full power and authority to and perform each and every act
and think requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
and to all intents and purposes as she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Form
10Q-SB has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
date indicated:

By: /s/ Cathy Souers
    --------------------------------
    President
    February 22, 2000

By: /s/ Diana Hewitt
    --------------------------------
    Secretary and Treasurer
    February 22, 2000
Exhibit 10.4

Additional Default Provisions




Default.  The following are events of default under the Note, the Warrant, and any other document related to the transactions contemplated by Securities Purchase Agreement Document SPA-06042012: (i) the Borrower shall fail to pay any principal under the Note when due and payable (or payable by conversion) thereunder; or (ii) the Borrower shall fail to pay any interest or any other amount under the Note when due and payable (or payable by conversion) thereunder; or (iii) the Company shall fail to pay any amount under the Warrant when due and payable (or payable upon exercise) thereunder; or (iv) the Company shall fail to honor its obligations under the Securities Purchase Agreement or any other document related to the Securities Purchase Agreement; or (v) a receiver, trustee or other similar official shall be appointed over the Borrower or a material part of its assets and such appointment shall remain uncontested for twenty (20) days or shall not be dismissed or discharged within sixty (60) days; or (vi) the Borrower shall become insolvent; or (vii) the Borrower shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (viii) the Borrower shall file a petition for relief under any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law (domestic or foreign); or (ix) an involuntary proceeding shall be commenced or filed against the Borrower; or (x) the Borrower shall lose its ability to electronically transfer shares by “DWAC/FAST” transfer; or (xi) the Borrower shall lose its status as “DTC Eligible”; or the borrower’s shareholders shall lose the ability to deposit (either electronically or by physical certificates, or otherwise) shares into the DTC System; or (xii) the Borrower shall become late or delinquent in its filing requirements as a fully-reporting issuer registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

 

COMPANY / BORROWER: 




SILVER FALCON MINING, INC.

 

By: ____________________________

Pierre Quilliam

Chief Executive Officer

 




LENDER/HOLDER:

 

____________________________

JMJ Financial / Its Principal
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Kinloch, certify that:

1.            
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Maverick Minerals
Corporation;

2.            
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.            
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.            
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a)            
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)            
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)            
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.            
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a)            
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)            
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 22, 2008

/s/ Robert
Kinloch
Robert Kinloch Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.551 Chester River.

The draw of the S213 Bridge, mile 26.8, at Chestertown, shall open on signal if at least six hours notice is given.

[USCG-2009-0796, 75 FR 10174, Mar. 5, 2010]
#### JOHN DOE *v.*STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

(AC 18617)

O’Connell, C. J., and Hennessy and Vertefeuille, Js.

Argued October 20

officially released December 28, 1999

*Max F. Brunswick,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Cathy A. Dowd,*assistant bar counsel, for the appellee (defendant).

*251
      *Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether an attorney against whom a grievance complaint has been filed with the statewide grievance committee (committee) must exhaust available administrative remedies before seeking judicial recourse from an adverse ruling of the committee. The plaintiff attorney, proceeding anonymously, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his request permanently to enjoin the committee from proceeding with a public hearing on certain alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The committee moved to dismiss this action, claiming that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by completing the public hearing already initiated and exhausting the remaining procedures set forth in Practice Book § 27J, now § 2-35. The trial court denied the committee’s motion to dismiss. The trial court thereafter denied the plaintiffs request for injunctive relief.

Subsequent to the filing of briefs in this appeal, our Supreme Court decided *Johnson*v. *Statewide Grievance Committee,*248 Conn. 87, 101, 726 A.2d 1154 (1999), holding that an attorney must exhaust his or her administrative remedies available through the grievance process before seeking judicial review or intervention. The Supreme Court rejected the claim, similar to the one made in the present case, that the attorney should not be required to exhaust his administrative remedies because of the harm to his practice and his reputation that would result from proceeding with the public hearing before the reviewing subcommittee. In rejecting the claim, the Supreme Court noted that the plaintiff had “failed to establish that any conceivable harm he might suffer as a result of a public hearing . . . would rise to a level warranting equitable intervention by the Superior Court.” Id., 107.

*252In light of *Johnson,*the committee’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies should be granted. The form of the judgment in favor of the committee is therefore improper. See *Waterworks*v. *Audet,*29 Conn. App. 722, 617 A.2d 932 (1992).

The form of the judgment is improper, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment dismissing the plaintiffs action.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service,  USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet on June 14 and 15, 2000, at the Town Hall in Fort Bragg, California. The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Wednesday, June 14, and from 8:30 a.m. to noon, on Thursday, June 15. The Town Hall is located at 363 No. Main St. in Fort Bragg. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Issues criteria and process; (2) status of watershed analyses on federal lands in the Province, their effectiveness and prioritization; (3) Protection of federal habitat for remnant native fish stocks; (4) regional Ecosystem Office (REO) update to include Survey and Manage Environmental Impact Statement, PAC rechartering and Interagency Species Management List; (5) Regional Interagency Executive Committee (REIC) and Interagency Advisory Committee (IAC) communication with the PAC; (6) Megram Fire update; (7) presentation on the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation proposal; (8) Northwest Forest Plan regional implementation monitoring schedule for 2000; (9) National Marine Fisheries Service presentation on impacts of Judge Rothstein's ruling; and (10) open public comment. All California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to James Fenwood, Forest Supervisor, or Phebe Brown, Province Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, 825 N. Humboldt Avenue, Willows, CA, 95988, (530) 934-3316.

Dated: May 23, 2000.

James D. Fenwood,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-13555  Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ELLEN T. BURNS, Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs , Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2024

- 1233

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 20

- 5933, Judge Michael P. Allen.

______________________
ON MOTION

______________________

Before P ROST , T ARANTO , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges

. T ARANTO , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R
The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims , stating:
Because neither [that court] nor the Board [of Veterans’ Appeals] addressed whether the Case: 24-1233 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 07/22/2024BURNS v. MCDONOUGH 2

complications of diabetes reflected in Mr. Burns’s treatment records entitled him to an increase in his rating for service

- connected diabetes in light of Part V.iii.11. 2.c. of the M21

- 1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, the parties respectfully submit that a remand would conserve resources and promote judicial efficiency here. The parties further agreethat, upon remand, the Veterans Court should address this theory of en titlement and determine whether any further proceedings are necessary to resolve Mrs. Burns’s accrued benefits claim.

Mot. at 5

. Upon consideration thereof

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims forfurther proceedings consistent with this order and the parties’ joint motion.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

Ju ly 2 2 , 2024 Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 22 , 2024 Case: 24-1233 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 07/22/2024
§ 580.10 Referral to Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) Upon receipt of a timely exception to a determination of penalties and request for a hearing filed pursuant to and in accordance with § 580.6 of this subpart, the Administrator, by the Associate Solicitor for the Division of Fair Labor Standards or by the Regional Solicitor for the Region in which the action arose, shall, by Order of Reference, refer the matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, for a determination in an administrative proceeding as provided herein. A copy of the notice of administrative determination and of the request for hearing shall be attached to the Order of Reference and shall, respectively, be given the effect of a complaint and answer thereto for purposes of the administrative proceeding, subject to any amendment that may be permitted under this subpart and 29 CFR part 18.
( b ) A copy of the Order of Reference and attachments thereto, together with a copy of this part, shall be served by counsel for the Administrator upon the person requesting the hearing, in the manner provided in § 580.8 of this subpart.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip navigation
  ADA HomeADA HistoryPart One: Origins of the ADAPart Two: Crafting the LawPart Three: The ADA Becomes LawAchieving the PromiseTools and TechHealth CareLearn, Work and PlayReal People
 Home
          ADA
          For blind and low vision musicians For blind and low vision musicians
 Musicians with low vision have long used large-print sheet music or hands-free monoculars to read, write, and play music. Advances in technology are now creating high-tech solutions that make it easier than ever for people with low vision to access music.
One example is the Lime Lighter Music Reader developed by Dancing Dots. The device displays printed music notation using the traditional five-line staff on a portable touch-screen tablet. Music can be scanned, typed, imported, or played into the device and can be edited and played back on the screen. The software enlarges printed music with up to 10x zoom while maintaining proper proportions and a Bluetooth foot pedal enables hands-free scrolling through the music.
Through the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR)’s Small Business Innovative Research program, ACL provided funding that helped Dancing Dots develop Lime Lighter and bring it to market. The program supports the development of new ideas and projects that are useful to people with disabilities by inviting the participation of small businesses with strong research capabilities in science, engineering, or educational technology.
Another Dancing Dots product supported by NIDILRR, is the GOODFEEL® Music Translator, which allows users with sight to easily transcribe music into braille and allows users who are blind to print their musical ideas out in standard staff notation.

                    *Last modified on 07/23/2020*
 Back to Top    More on the ADA
  

        
      ACL's 31st Anniversary of the ADA page
                      ADA.gov
                      ADA National Network
                      #ThanksToTheADA campaignSITE SUPPORT
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Contact Us
                      Disclaimers
                      Freedom of Information Act
                      Privacy policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers and PlayersRELATED SITES
  

        
      Administration for Community Living
                      HHS Office for Civil Rights
                      Department of Health and Human Services
                      CMS: Access to Care
                      No Fear Act (on HHS.gov)
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      White House
#### § 780.309 Man-day exclusion.

Section 3(e)(1) specifically excludes from the employer's man-day total (as defined in section 3(u)) employees who qualify for exemption under section 13(a)(6)(B). See § 780.301. This man-day count is a basic factor in the application of the section 13(a)(6)(A) exemption. See § 780.302 *et seq.*