alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Older Americans Month 2023 Templates
 Sample Article
This drop-in article can be used as a fill-in-the-blank template or as inspiration for an original piece.
Sample OAM articleSample Proclamation
Sample OAM Proclamation

                    *Last modified on 03/15/2023*
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 335 

Recognizing that the occurrence of prostate cancer in African-American men 

has reached epidemic proportions and urging Federal agencies to address 

that health crisis by designating funds for education, awareness outreach, 

and research specifically focused on how that disease affects AfricanAmerican men. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that the occurrence of prostate cancer in African-American men has reached epidemic proportions and 

urging Federal agencies to address that health crisis 

by designating funds for education, awareness outreach, 

and research specifically focused on how that disease 

affects African-American men. 

Whereas the incidence of prostate cancer in African-American 

men is 60 percent higher than any other racial or ethnic 

group in the United States; 

Whereas African-American men have the highest mortality 

rate of any ethnic and racial group in the United States, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 335 IS 

dying at a rate that is 140 percent higher than other ethnic and racial groups; 

Whereas that rate of mortality represents the largest disparity of mortality rates in any of the major cancers; 

Whereas prostate cancer can be cured with early detection 

and the proper treatment, regardless of the ethnic or racial group of the cancer patient; 

Whereas African-Americans are more likely to be diagnosed 

earlier in age and at a later stage of cancer progression 

than for all other ethnic and racial groups, thereby leading to lower cure rates and lower chances of survival; and 

Whereas, according to a paper published in the Proceedings 

of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers from 

the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical 

School have discovered a variant of a small segment of 

the human genome that accounts for the higher risk of 

prostate cancer in African-American men: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that prostate cancer has created 

3 a health crisis for African-American men; and 

4 (2) urges Federal agencies to designate addi5 tional funds for— 

6 (A) research to address and attempt to end 

7 the health crisis created by prostate cancer; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 335 IS 

1 (B) efforts relating to education, aware2 ness, and early detection at the grassroots levels 

3 to end that health crisis. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson , , EPA Administrator 40 CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part

49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities Production Facilities ,

, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation ( Mandan , Hidatsa and

Hidatsa and Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Arikara Nations ,

, or MHA Nation or MHA Nation or MHA Nation )

, North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota . (

as defined in § as defined in § as defined in § 49.152 Carl Daly Carl Daly to: mhouston 08/02/2012 11:15 AM Cc: ksuthiwan, rgorka, mbdurrant, Deirdre Rothery, Kate Fay, Sara Laumann This message is digitally signed. Mr. Houston, This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities Production Facilities ,

, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation ( Mandan , Hidatsa and Arikara Nations

Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations , or MHA Nation Nation) ) , North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota ,

” (Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP) a federal rule that applies to oil and gas operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota . The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions , recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule . Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail to the primary contact for Slawson Exploration:

Slawson_Actual Notice of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf And a copy of the interim final rule:

Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) f or ACTUAL NOTICE LETTERS.pdf If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Deirdre Rothery, Chief Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit at rothery.deirdre@epa.gov or 303-312-6431. Thank you, Carl Daly, Director, Air Program 303-312-6416
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of March 
21, 2000

    In accordance with Sec. 71.5 of its rules regarding availability of 
information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on March 21, 2000. \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
meeting of March 21, 2000, which include the domestic policy 
directive issued at that meeting, are available upon request to the 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 
20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and 
in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in 
the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent 
with increasing the federal funds rate to an average of around 6 
percent.

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, May 24, 2000.
Donald L. Kohn,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-13644 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 901.4 Handling of disputes by Commission.

The Commission will determine the particular method of dispute handling appropriate for each dispute. Section 5(a) of the Executive order states,

The Commission or a panel designated by the Commission may, with the assistance of national labor organizations and national contractor associations where appropriate, seek to mediate such dispute, or make an investigation of the facts of the dispute and make such recommendations to the parties for the resolution thereof as it determines appropriate.
§ 99.305 Auditor selection. ( a ) *Auditor procurement.* In procuring audit services, auditees shall follow the procurement standards prescribed by OMB Circular A-102, “Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments;” 29 CFR part 97, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments;” OMB Circular A-110, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations;” (codified at 2 CFR part 215); or the FAR (48 CFR part 42), as applicable. (OMB Circulars are available on-line at *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/index.html .*) Whenever possible, auditees shall make positive efforts to utilize small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises, in procuring audit services as stated in OMB Circular A-102, OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR part 215), or the FAR (48 CFR part 42), as applicable. In requesting proposals for audit services, the objectives and scope of the audit should be made clear. Factors to be considered in evaluating each proposal for audit services include the responsiveness to the request for proposal, relevant experience, availability of staff with professional qualifications and technical abilities, the results of external quality control reviews, and price.
( b ) *Restriction on auditor preparing indirect cost proposals.* An auditor who prepares the indirect cost proposal or cost allocation plan may not also be selected to perform the audit required by this part when the indirect costs recovered by the auditee during the prior year exceeded $1 million. This restriction applies to the base year used in the preparation of the indirect cost proposal or cost allocation plan and any subsequent years in which the resulting indirect cost agreement or cost allocation plan is used to recover costs. To minimize any disruption in existing contracts for audit services, this paragraph applies to audits of fiscal years beginning after June 30, 1998.
( c ) *Use of Federal auditors.* Federal auditors may perform all or part of the work required under this part if they comply fully with the requirements of this part.
[64 FR 14541, Mar. 25, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 37105, July 9, 2007]
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | • | the                  Quarterly Report of the Company on Form                  10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, (the “Report”) fully complies                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the                  Securities                  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | • | the                  information contained in the Report fairly                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and                  results of                  operations of the Company.                                                                                                  |

|   |                                                                                   |                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                   | /s/ KENNETH                S. CRAGUN |
|   | Kenneth                  S. Cragun                                                     |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer and Chief Accounting                  Officer |

----
§ 801.53 Request for hearing. ( a ) Any person desiring to request an administrative hearing on a civil money penalty assessment pursuant to this part shall make such request in writing to the official who issued the determination at the Wage and Hour Division address appearing on the determination notice, no later than 30 days after the date of receipt of the notice referred to in § 801.51 of this part.
( b ) The request for hearing must be received by the Administrator at the address set forth in the notice issued pursuant to § 801.52 of this part, within the time set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. For the affected person's protection, if the request is by mail, it should be by certified mail, return receipt requested.
( c ) No particular form is prescribed for any request for hearing permitted by this subpart. However, any such request shall: ( 1 ) Be typewritten or legibly written;
( 2 ) Specify the issue or issues stated in the notice of determination giving rise to such request;
( 3 ) State the specific reason or reasons why the person requesting the hearing believes such determination is in error;
( 4 ) Be signed by the person making the request or by an authorized representative of such person; and
( 5 ) Include the address at which such person or authorized representative desires to receive further communications relating thereto.
[56 FR 9064, Mar. 4, 1991; 56 FR 14469, Apr. 10, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 46531, Sept. 7, 1995]
#### HERMA STRIBULA *v.*JOZEF KUBACKA ET AL.

(AC 19306)

O’Connell, C. J., and Foti and Healey, Js.

Submitted on briefs December 15, 1999

officially released January 18, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Sheila Enright, Formerly Known as Sheila Vasile, Respondent, v Carmine Vasile, Appellant.

Submitted May 28, 1996;

decided July 9, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion *(see,*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602).
#### § 783.50 Work exempt under another section of the Act.

Where an employee performs work during his workweek, some of which is exempt under one section of the Act, and the remainder of which is exempt under another section or sections of the Act, the exemptions may be combined. The employee's combination exemption is controlled in such case by that exemption which is narrower in scope. For example, if part of his work is exempt from both minimum wage and overtime compensation under one section of the Act, and the rest is exempt only from the overtime pay requirements under section 13(b)(6), the employee is exempt that week from the overtime pay provisions but not from the minimum wage requirements.
#### § 780.518 Exempt processing operations.

The processing operations under section 13(a)(14) include, but are not limited to, “drying, curing, fermenting, bulking, rebulking, sorting, grading, aging, and baling” of the shade-grown tobacco. As previously noted, these operations are exempt only if performed on shade-grown tobacco prior to the stemming process to prepare the tobacco for use as cigar wrapper tobacco.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration 

          - [Exemption Application No. D-10654]

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     dated February 29, 2000 (65 FR 10826), the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and from certain taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption concerned the prospective cash sale of a certain parcel of real property by the Plan to the trust of Emilie Keil, a party in interest with respect to the Plan.                 

On April 7, 2000, the applicant informed the Department that it wished to withdraw the notice of proposed exemption. 

Accordingly, the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of May, 2000. 

Ivan L. Strasfeld, 

Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Department of Labor. 

[FR Doc. 00-13642 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 30 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JIU DONG,

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney

General; IMMIGRATION &

NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondents.

No. 01-9548

(BIA No. A77 293 813)

(Petition for Review)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HENRY, BRISCOE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the petition for review and related materials, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals dismissing his appeal of the immigration judge’s order of deportation. 

In addition, petitioner seeks a stay of removal during the pendency of proceedings

before this court. Our initial review of the materials filed by petitioner caused us

to question our jurisdiction because the petition for review did not appear to be

either timely filed under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) or filed in the correct circuit under

8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2). See Kennedy v. Lubar, 273 F.3d 1293, 1301 (10th Cir.

2001) (“We have routinely recognized our ability to raise the question of

appellate jurisdiction sua sponte . . . .”). Accordingly, on December 26, 2001,

we issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why the petition for review

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The time for response has since

passed, and petitioner has not responded to the show cause order.

We, therefore, DISMISS the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction and

DENY the motion for stay of removal as moot.

Entered for the Court,

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3322]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Gallery for the Arts of Korea''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459 ), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of 
October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibition ``Gallery for the Arts of Korea,'' imported from abroad 
for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to 
loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum, New York, NY from June 2000 to June 2002 is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301--4th 
Street, SW, Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-13541 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-M