alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10598-10599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Ninth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
ninth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 17-21, 2014 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Eurocae Headquarters, 102 Rue 
Etienne Dolet, 92240 Malakoff, France.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-0662 
or (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bousquet may be contacted directly at 
email: sbousquet@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 227. The agenda will 
include the following:

March 17-21

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
     Agenda Overview
     Overview of Planned Work Program for the Week
    [cir] Plan for MASPS Change 1
    [cir] Plan for MOPS
     Committee Coordination on Dynamic RNP (SC-214), and A-IM 
(SC-186).
     Plenary Review--MASPS/MOPS
    [cir] Planned Work Schedule (Note, schedule subject to change based 
upon progress/pace/issue)

[[Page 10599]]

    [cir] 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. each day
     Technical Requirements Breakout Sessions (as needed)
     Other Business
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 12, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-03924 Filed 2-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: MEDIA QUEUE, LLC,

Appellant

______________________ 

2014-1794

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,469.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JOHN NICHOLAS GROSS, Law Office of J. Nicholas 

Gross, Berkeley, CA, argued for appellant.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by JOSEPH 

GERARD PICCOLO, NATHAN K. KELLEY. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and 

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### Aiken *v.*Carmichael.

Beok, J.

1. The court did not err in denying an application for a continuance upon the ground of the absence of a witness, when the movant failed to show that such application was not made for the purpose of delay, although the showing in other respects may have been complete. Civil Code, §5129; *Boggess*v. *Lowery,*78 *Ga.*353.

2. This court will not reverse the judgment of the trial court refusing to continue a case upon the ground of the illness of counsel, when the latter ground was not submitted for the consideration of the court until after the motion referred to in the first headnote had been decided adversely to movant. “All grounds of motion for . . continuance must be urged and insisted upon at once. And after a decision upon *408one or more grounds, no others afterwards urged shall be heard by the . court.” Civil Code, § 5675.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided January 18, 1907.

Complaint. Before Judge Reagan. Butts superior court. September 16, 1905.

*Bay &*Bay, for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices conetir, except Fish, C J., absent.*
§ 780.151 Particular operations on commodities. Subject to the rules heretofore discussed, the following activities are, among others, activities that may be performed in the “preparation for market” of the indicated commodities and may come within section 3(f): ( a ) *Grain, seed, and forage crops.* Weighing, binning, stacking, drying, cleaning, grading, shelling, sorting, packing, and storing.
( b ) *Fruits and vegetables.* Assembling, ripening, cleaning, grading, sorting, drying, preserving, packing, and storing. (See In the Matter of J. J. Crosetti, 29 LRRM 1353, 98 NLRB 268; In the Matter of Imperial Garden Growers, 91 NLRB 1034, 26 LRRM 1632; *Lenroot* v. *Hazelhurst Mercantitle Co.,* 59 F. Supp. 595; *North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n* v. *NLRB,* 109 F.2d 76; *Dofflemeyer* v. *NLRB,* 206 F.2d 813.)
( c ) *Peanuts and nuts (pecans, walnuts, etc.).* Grading, cracking, shelling, cleaning, sorting, packing, and storing.
( d ) *Eggs.* Handling, cooling, grading, candling, and packing.
( e ) *Wool.* Grading and packing.
( f ) *Dairy products.* Separating, cooling, packing, and storing.
( g ) *Cotton.* Weighing, ginning, and storing cotton; hulling, delinting, cleaning, sacking, and storing cottonseed.
( h ) *Nursery stock.* Handling, sorting, grading, trimming, bundling, storing, wrapping, and packing. (See *Jordan* v. *Stark Brothers Nurseries,* 45 F. Supp. 769; *Mitchell* v. *Huntsville Nurseries,* 267 F.2d 286.)
( i ) *Tobacco.* Handling, grading, drying, stripping from stalk, tying, sorting, storing, and loading.
( j ) *Livestock.* Handling and loading.
( k ) *Poultry.* Culling, grading, cooping, and loading.
( l ) *Honey.* Assembling, extracting, heating, ripening, straining, cleaning, grading, weighing, blending, packaging, and storing.
( m ) *Fur.* Removing the pelt, scraping, drying, putting on boards, and packing.
Order entered September 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00856-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.B AND R.D.B, CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-15158

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s September 2, 2014 motion to substitute counsel. We DIRECT

the Clerk of this Court to substitute Justin W. Low as counsel for appellant in the place of 

Lawrence Friedman and LeAnn Diamond.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Mississippi Industries: A Study of Hours, Wages, and Working Conditions

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in Mississippi Industries: A Study of Hours, Wages, and Working Conditions : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 55*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1926,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5368,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 115.05 Necessary primary authority.

For bridges constructed by State or municipal agencies, the primary authority will be presumed without proof. If the law of the State requires a license for or approval of the bridge from a constituted State agency, a copy of such license or approval will be required and may be accepted as evidence of the primary authority. If there is no State regulation of bridges in navigable waters, the necessary primary authority may be that granted in the charter of a corporation, or the authority inherent in the ownership of the land on which the structure is placed. The applicant will in such cases be required to furnish an excerpt from the charter, or a statement of ownership. Special care will be taken that Federal approval is not granted when there is doubt of the right of the applicant to construct and utilize the bridge.

[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17771, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by USCG-2011-0257, 76 FR 31836, June 2, 2011: USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37314, June 21, 2012; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35081, July 28, 2017]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.107 Chattahoochee River.

The draws of the CSX Transportation Railroad bridge, mile 117.1 near Omaha, GA, shall open on signal if at least six hours notice is given.
#### § 785.26 Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Section 3(o) of the Act provides an exception to the general rule for employees under collective bargaining agreements. This section provides for the exclusion from hours worked of time spent by an employee in changing clothes or washing at the beginning or end of each workday which was excluded from measured working time during the week involved by the express terms of or by custom or practice under a bona fide collective-bargaining agreement applicable to the particular employee. During any week in which such clothes-changing or washing time was not so excluded, it must be counted as hours worked if the changing of clothes or washing is indispensable to the performance of the employee's work or is required by law or by the rules of the employer. The same would be true if the changing of clothes or washing was a preliminary or postliminary activity compensable by contract, custom, or practice as provided by section 4 of the Portal-to-Portal Act, and as discussed in § 785.9 and part 790 of this chapter.

[30 FR 9912, Aug. 10, 1965]
#### Jana Birsett, Respondent, v General Accident Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

Submitted June 24, 1996;

decided September 12, 1996

*1006Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of modification, dismissed as untimely *(see,*CPLR 5513 [b]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the judgment entered upon the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the judgment is not the final appealable paper from which leave to appeal may be sought *(see,*CPLR 5611).
# Map            Chile, physiography.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Federal coal program programmatic environmental impact statement: scopingreport
** 
V1 | V2
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59:C 63/V.1-2
Item Number:0629-E-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001094373
March 7, 2019****
## All Purpose Table

Administration for Community Living

(Dollars in Millions)

 1/ Reflects amounts appropriated, and any reprogramming or reallocation notified to Congress except for the Nutrition Services Incentive Program transfer to USDA ($2.2 in FY 2023) which is shown for consistency with State funding tables.

2/ These programs are paid out of the Prevention and Public Health Fund.

3/ The FY 2023 appropriation states that SMP/Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program (HCFAC) can be paid for with discretionary CMS HCFAC appropriations and/or HCFAC Wedge funds, the amount based on the Secretary of HHS’s determination but no less than the $35M floor provided in appropriations language. The FY 2023 and FY 2024 amounts are placeholders for the Secretary’s final decision. 

4/ Amounts shown in FY 2022 and FY 2023 reflect a sequester of 5.7 percent for half of FY 2022 and the entirety of FY 2023. The FY 2024 level matches ACL’s request to reauthorize the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act program and direct all MIPPA funding to ACL. 

5/ Supplemental funding totaling $10M for the National Technical Assistance Center of Grandparents and Kinship Care is available until FY 2025.

308
**Host Organization Information Form**

1. Site Name:                                                                                                       ____________  

 Street Address: _______________________________________________________

City:                                                         _____ State:  Zip code:___________

2. Type of site (select the type that best describes your site): 

3.   Which falls prevention program(s) are you licensed to offer?  [Note to Grantee: adapt this to fit local programming]

4. Contact Person’s Name and Information: 

First and Last Name: _______________________________________________________ 

Daytime phone number: _________________________

Email address: _________________________________

*Optional:*

Title or role with organization:_______________________________________________

Role with the falls prevention program(s):______________________________________

Date trained in the falls prevention program:  ___________________________________
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10447

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HOMBERTO CASTRO-ORPINEDA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-56-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pursuantto a written plea agreement, Homberto Castro-Orpineda pleaded

guilty to possession with intentto distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana

and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. CastroOrpineda appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty

plea.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 6, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10447

2

We review for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Washington, 480

F.3d 309, 316 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the district court accepted CastroOrpineda’s guilty plea, Castro-Orpineda could withdraw it only if he could “show

a fair and just reason for requesting the withdraw.” FED. R. CRIM.P. 11(d)(2)(B);

United States v. Still, 102 F.3d 118, 124 (5th Cir. 1996).

Castro-Orpineda argues thatthe district court erred by denying his motion

solely on the ground that his guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. He reviews

each ofthe factors set out in United States v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir.

1984), and argues that all but one (close assistance of counsel) weigh in favor of

the grant of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. However, in support of his

motion, Castro-Orpineda raised, at most, only the innocence factor. “[A]

defendant cannot fail to invoke any of the Carr factors in support of his motion

and then argue that the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider

arguments that he had the burden to raise.” Washington, 480 F.3d at 317

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Moreover, the district court

was not required to make specific findings on every Carr factor. Id. Under the

facts of this case, Castro-Orpineda failed to demonstrate a fair and just reason

for the withdrawal of his guilty plea, and the district court did not abuse its

discretion by denying the motion. See id.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1981-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-1981-DR), dated May 10, 2011, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 4, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 10, 2011.

Benson County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Dated: August 11, 2011.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2011-20964 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Submitted on record and briefs December 23, 1992,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 20, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert J. Nichols, Claimant. HOUCK CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Petitioners, v.*Robert J. NICHOLS, *Respondent.*

(91-07365; CA A75201)

844 P2d 284

Alexander D. Libmann, Portland, filed the brief for petitioners.

David W. Hittle and Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Lees on,* Judges.

*

 Leeson, J., *vice*Buttler, J., retired.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, *rev den*315 Or 271 (1992).
### Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States through September, 1950; part 3-B. Cumberland and Tennessee River basins

By: J. V. B. Wells

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1306

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
combustionsurvey

- EPA Boiler MACT Comments

Please consider the attached Boiler MACT Comments f rom FMC Corporation, Green River, WY.

Thank you.



### Angela Aalbers Environmental Engineer
FMC - Green River (P) 307-872-2111 (F) 307-872-2360 From: Angela Aalbers <Angela.Aalbers@fmc.com> To: "combustionsurvey@erg.com" <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/15/2011 1:15 PM Subject: EPA Boiler MACT Comments CC: John Lucas <John.Lucas@fmc.com>, Mike Wendorf <MIKE.WENDORF@fmc. com> Attachments: FMC EPA_BMACT_comments071411.pdf Page 1 of 1

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E203D73DO

...