alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Hiawatha East Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Hiawatha East Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Kincheloe, Michigan. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose is to review project proposals.

DATES: The meeting will be held on August 25, 2011, and will begin at 6 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Chippewa County 911 Center, 
4657 Industrial Park Drive, Kincheloe, MI. Written comments should be 
sent to Janel Crooks, Hiawatha National Forest, 2727 North Lincoln 
Road, Escanaba, MI 49829. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to 
[email protected], or via facsimile to 906-789-3311.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Hiawatha National 
Forest, 2727 North Lincoln Road, Escanaba, MI. Visitors are encouraged 
to call ahead to 906-786-4062 to facilitate entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janel Crooks, RAC coordinator, USDA, 
Hiawatha National Forest, 2727 North Lincoln Road, Escanaba, Michigan 
49862; (906) 786-4062; e-mail [email protected].
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Discuss options for 
monitoring approved projects, (2) Review budget, if received at that 
time, and (3) Public Comment. Persons who wish to bring related matters 
to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting.

    Dated: August 1, 2011.
Stevan J. Christiansen,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20110 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Computation of Ratio ofEarnings to Fixed Charges

(dollars in thousands)

 
| ** **                          | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended  September 30,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2005**                                  | ** ** | **2004**                         | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                           |       |                                      |       |                             |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                          |       | $                                         | 43,019     |                             | $          | 40,229 |   | $ | 56,742 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   | $ | 58,437 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |       | 34,585                                    |       | 30,910                           |       | 41,836 |   | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   | 15,366 |   |
| Adjusted  earnings                  |       | $                                         | 77,604     |                             | $          | 71,139 |   | $ | 98,578 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   | $ | 73,803 |   |
|                                |       |                                      |       |                             |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                      |       |                                      |       |                             |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |       | $                                         | 34,585     |                             | $          | 30,910 |   | $ | 41,836 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   | $ | 15,366 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges |       | 2.2                                       | x          | 2.3                              | x          | 2.4 | x | 2.2 | x | 2.7 | x | 3.3 | x | 4.8 | x |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

AKANINYENE EFIONG AKAN,

Petitioner

v.

HON. DONNA JO MCDANIEL OF THE

COURT OF C O MMON PLEAS,

ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 17 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of April, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief

is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the

capt ion.
On-board	Circulation	and	Seating	Subcommittee Call (#9)

10/08/2014

U.S.	Access	Board:	Rail	Vehicles Access	Advisory	Committee

Subcommittee	for On-board	Circulation	and	Seating	

1.		Introductions

2.		Approval	of	the	Agenda

3.		Review	and	completion	of	the	attached	matrix.

The	attached	matrix	has	been	revised	with	revisions RED,	underlined	and	itallic.	

4. Review	of	surfaces.

5.			Seat	“handles”

6.		Original	“issues”	list.	Have	we	captured	everything	between	the	subcommittees?

5.		Next	Steps:

6.		Action	Items

7.		Assignments

8.		Deadlines

9.		Next	Meeting

[Attachments]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.979 Sabine Lake.

The draw of the S82 bridge, mile 10.0 at Port Arthur, shall open on signal; except that, from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least six hours notice is given to the Maintenance Construction Supervisor or the Maintenance Foreman at Port Arthur.
#### § 783.0 Purpose of this part.

This part 783 is the official interpretation of the Department of Labor with respect to the meaning and application of sections 6(b)(2), 13(a)(14), and 13(b)(6) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, which govern the application of the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements of the Act to employees employed as seamen. Prior to the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1961, which became effective on September 3, 1961, all employees employed as seamen were exempt from both the minimum wage and overtime pay provisions of the Act. The 1961 amendments have narrowed this exemption so as to extend the minimum wage provisions of the Act to employees employed as seamen on American vessels. Employees employed as seamen on vessels other than American vessels continue to be exempt from both the minimum wage and the overtime pay requirements of the Act. It is the purpose of this part to make available in one place the interpretations of the law relating to employees employed as seamen which will guide the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator in the performance of their duties under the Act.
1

NO. 12-20-00030-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R., 

A CHILD

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 321ST 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--

at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas Supreme 

Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. An appellate court may enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. 

Id. After giving ten days’ notice, an appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant 

failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk 

requiring a response or other action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

On January 30, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant, T.R., that the filing fee in 

this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing 

fee on or before February 10 would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including 

dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The date for remitting 

the filing fee passed, and Appellant has not paid the fee or otherwise shown that he is excused 

from paying the fee.1

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

 1 The case information sheet provided by the Smith County District Clerk’s Office does not reflect that 

Appellant has been declared indigent.
2

Opinion delivered February 19, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 19, 2020

NO. 12-20-00030-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R., A CHILD

Appeal from the 321st District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 18-1250-D)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this 

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below 

for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
SERVED: JANUARY 15, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF EARTH SCIENCE PRODUCTS CORP. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-1114 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014NM720027) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Shane Kennedy, President Earth Science Products Corp., Respondent 23735 NEAirportRd. Aurora, OR 97002 TEL: 503-678-1216 FAX: 503-678:-3374 David Shayne, Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal AviationAdministration 1601 Lind Ave., S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1114 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.913 Ashepoo River.

The draw of the Seaboard System Railroad bridge, mile 32.0 at Ashepoo, need not be opened for the passage of vessels. However, the draw shall be returned to operable condition within six months after notification by the District Commander to do so.
§ 99.405 Management decision. ( a ) *General.* The management decision shall clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency or pass-through entity may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee.
( b ) *Federal agency.* As provided in § 99.400(a)(7), the cognizant agency for audit shall be responsible for coordinating a management decision for audit findings that affect the programs of more than one Federal agency. As provided in § 99.400(c)(5), a Federal awarding agency is responsible for issuing a management decision for findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to recipients. Alternate arrangements may be made on a case-by-case basis by agreement among the Federal agencies concerned.
( c ) *Pass-through entity.* As provided in § 99.400(d)(5), the pass-through entity shall be responsible for making the management decision for audit findings that relate to Federal awards it makes to subrecipients.
( d ) *Time requirements.* The entity responsible for making the management decision shall do so within six months of receipt of the audit report. Corrective action should be initiated within six months after receipt of the audit report and proceed as rapidly as possible.
( e ) *Reference numbers.* Management decisions shall include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with § 99.510(c).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          31,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,405
<INVENTORY>                                    125,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,161
<PP&E>                                         474,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                 175,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,236
<BONDS>                                        232,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,418<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,005
<SALES>                                      1,790,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,790,140
<CGS>                                        1,349,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,723,685<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Number of Class A and Class B shares outstanding
<F2>Includes (i) $1,349,198 of Cost of Goods Sold (Item 5-03(b)2(a) of Regulation
S-X) and (ii) $374,487 of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (item
5-03(b)4 of Regulation S-X)
<F3>Multiplier is 1 for per share data
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 137.65 Visual inspections of the facility, the real property on which the facility is located, and adjoining properties. ( a ) For the purpose of achieving the objectives and performance factors of § 137.30(a) and (b), the inquiry of the environmental professional must include the following: ( 1 ) A visual on-site inspection of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located, and the improvements at the facility and real property, including a visual inspection of the areas where oil may be or may have been used, stored, treated, handled, or disposed. Physical limitations to the visual inspection must be noted.
( 2 ) A visual inspection of adjoining properties, from the subject real property line, public rights-of-way, or other vantage point (e.g., aerial photography), including a visual inspection of areas where oil may be or may have been stored, treated, handled or disposed. A visual on-site inspection is recommended, though not required. Physical limitations to the inspection of adjacent properties must be noted.
( b ) Except as in paragraph (c) of this section, a visual on-site inspection of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located must be conducted.
( c ) An on-site inspection is not required if an on-site visual inspection of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located cannot be performed because of physical limitations, remote and inaccessible location, or other inability to obtain access to the facility and the real property on which the facility is located after good faith efforts have been taken to obtain access. The mere refusal of a voluntary seller to provide access to the facility and the real property on which the facility is located is not justification for not conducting an on-site inspection. The inquiry of the environmental professional must include— ( 1 ) Visually inspecting the facility and the real property on which the facility is located using another method, such as aerial imagery for large properties, or visually inspecting the facility and the real property on which the facility is located from the nearest accessible vantage point, such as the property line or public road for small properties;
( 2 ) Documenting the efforts undertaken to obtain access and an explanation of why such efforts were unsuccessful; and
( 3 ) Documenting other sources of information regarding the presence or likely presence of oil at the facility and the real property on which the facility is located that were consulted according to § 137.30(a). The documentation should include comments, if any, by the environmental professional on the significance of the failure to conduct a visual on-site inspection of the facility and the real property on which the facility is located with regard to the ability to identify conditions indicative of the presence or likely presence of oil at the facility and the real property.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.569 Pocomoke River. ( a ) The Conrail railroad bridge, mile 15.2, at Pocomoke City, shall open on signal, except between November 1 and March 31 the draw must open only if at least five hours advance notice is given to the bridge operator (Delmarva Central Railroad Company) by calling 1-802-774-0305.
( b ) The draw of the Route 675 bridge, mile 15.6, at Pocomoke City, shall open on signal, except between November 1 and March 31 the draw must open only if at least five hours advance notice is given.
( c ) The draw of the S12 bridge, mile 29.9, at Snow Hill, shall open on signal if at least five hours advance notice is given.
[CGD5-87-063, 53 FR 16548, May 10, 1988, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58278, Sept. 18, 2020]
§ 780.714 Employees employed “in such operations” to be counted. ( a ) The five-employee limitation on the exemption for country elevators relates to the number of employees employed in the establishment “in such operations.” This means that the employees to be counted include those employed in, and do not include any who are not employed in, the operations of the establishment commonly recognized as a country elevator, including the operations of such an establishment in selling products and services used in the operation of a farm, as previously explained.
( b ) In some circumstances, an employee employed in an establishment commonly recognized as a country elevator may, during his workweek, be employed in work which is not part of the operations of the elevator establishment. This would be true, for example, in the case of an employee who spends his entire workweek in the construction of an overflow warehouse for the elevator. Such an employee would not be counted in that workweek because constructing a warehouse is not part of the operations of the country elevator but is an entirely distinct activity.
( c ) Employees employed by the same employer in a separate establishment in which he is engaged in a different business, and not employed in the operations of the elevator establishment, would not be counted.
( d ) Employees not employed by the elevator establishment who come there sporadically, occasionally, or casually in the course of their duties for other employers are not employed in the operations of the establishment commonly recognized as a country elevator and would not be counted in determining whether the five-employee limitation is exceeded in any workweek. Examples of such employees are employees of a restaurant who bring food and beverages to the elevator employees, and employees of other employers who make deliveries to the establishment.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.373 St. Marys River.

See § 117.329, St. Marys River, listed under Florida.

[CGD 92-015, 57 FR 37880, Aug. 21, 1992]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.957 Cedar Bayou. The draw of the Union Pacific railroad automated bridge, mile 7.0 at Baytown, operates as follows: ( a ) The draw shall be maintained at a vertical clearance of 81.4 feet above mean high water. Fixed green navigation lights shall be displayed in the center of the draw.
( b ) When a train approaches the bridge, the navigation lights shall be changed from green to red, alternating flashing red lights turned on, and a horn sounded for six minutes. At the end of six minutes, the draw may be lowered and locked if the scanning equipment does not detect any object under the span. If the scanning equipment detects an obstruction, the draw shall be raised until the obstruction is cleared.
( c ) After a train has cleared the bridge, the draw shall be raised to 81.4 feet above mean high water, the flashing red lights stopped, and the navigation lights changed from red to green.
February 16, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VINCE CASIMIR AND ASPEN PREMIER ASSETS, LTD., Appellant

NO. 14-12-00023-CV V.

FRONTERA ENERGY, LLC, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on January 6, 2012. Having considered the motion and found 

it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by VINCE 

CASIMIR AND ASPEN PREMIER ASSETS, LTD.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.