alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 110.207 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds* — ( 1 ) *West anchorage.* The northwesterly portion of the West Basin between the northwest limits of the West Basin and a line parallel to and 1,050 feet distant from the West Breakwater; and from the southwest limits of the West Basin to a line perpendicular to the West Breakwater, 2,050 feet southwesterly along the West Breakwater from Cleveland West Breakwater Light.
( 2 ) *East anchorage.* The southeasterly portion of the East Basin between the mainland and a line parallel to and 1,250 feet distant from the East Breakwater; from opposite Cleveland East Entrance Light to a due north line passing through the flashing white light on the Allied Oil Company dock.
( 3 ) *Explosives anchorage.* In Lake Erie, northwest of Cleveland Harbor East Breakwater, and including a rectangular area marked by four white spar buoys at the following true bearings and distances from Cleveland East Pierhead Light: 38°30′, 2,050 feet; 68°, 2,050 feet; 57°, 7,050 feet; and 49°, 7,050 feet.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The west and east anchorages are general anchorages.
( 2 ) Use of the explosives anchorage shall be subject to the supervision of the Captain of the Port.
**Preparing an Emergency Plan for Your Unique Needs**

Disasters such as hurricanes, floods, fires and other emergency situations are all too common these days. In fact, about 4 out of 5 Americans live in counties hit by weather events since 2007, according to disaster declaration data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). That illustrates how these events can impact nearly everyone and the importance of having a plan. 

This is particularly true for older people and people with disabilities. Health issues, mobility concerns and use of assistive devices can create additional challenges during emergencies. However, there are simple steps everyone can take to prepare now for what may come later.

· **Discuss your plan.**Talk about preparedness with friends, neighbors and family members**.**Contact your city or county emergency management office as well as service providers, such as meals programs. Discussing the topic can help you create a support network, find local resources for preparation and identify contents for a custom emergency kit.

· **Create a contact list.**Make a list of people and places you can turn to for support in an emergency, including people you may need to help or notify of your safety. Include phone numbers, email addresses and physical addresses. Also include insurance providers, health care professionals and medical supply companies. Keep one copy on hand and put another copy in a watertight container in your emergency kit.

· **Prep for power outages.**Ask your health care providers about how to prepare for power outages, especially if you depend on medical devices that use electricity, such as oxygen, dialysis or a power wheelchair. Write down your plan, along with information about your devices, and keep a copy in your emergency kit.

· **Make a list of all medications and medical supplies.** Keep a list of your medicines, including dosages and allergies, along with other essential supplies like extra eyeglasses, hearing-aid batteries and at least a week’s supply of all prescription medicines in your emergency kit.

· **Plan for transportation.** Have a plan in place in case you need to evacuate or get to health care services during an emergency. Know what equipment you need and how you will transport it. Perhaps a neighbor or family member can include you in their evacuation plans. Set this up beforehand and plan how to coordinate in the event of a disaster. 

· **Plan for pets and service animals.** Include food, medications and other supplies your pets may need in your emergency kit, too. 

· **Pack the essentials.**In addition to your medical information and needs, don’t forget essentials such as non-perishable food, water, a weather radio, a flashlight, extra batteries, blankets, cash, extra clothing and personal hygiene items. Keep your emergency kit in an easy-to-access location.

Learn more about preparedness at https://acl.gov/EmergencyPreparedness.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-6956

LEROY BOONE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge.

(CR-90-149-N, CA-96-372-2)

Submitted: February 10, 1998

Decided: February 25, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Leroy Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Albert David Alberi, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Boone appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.§ 2255 (1994)

(current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)).

The district court found that before Boone could file a successive

§ 2255 motion, he must obtain authorization from this court to do so.

Because we find that authorization is not required, we vacate and

remand.

Boone filed a successive § 2255 motion on April 8, 1996, raising

six claims. He then filed an addendum on April 25, 1996, contending

that his conviction for using and carrying a firearm should be overturned in light of Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995). Boone

filed his § 2255 motion before April 24, 1996 (the effective date of

the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 ("AEDPA")). Moreover, the envelope in

which Boone mailed the addendum bears a postmark of April 23,

1996. Under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the addendum is

deemed filed when Boone handed it to prison officials for mailing--

before the AEDPA's effective date. See Burns v. Morton, ___ F.3d

___, ___, 1998 WL 15128, at *4 (3d Cir. 1998). Because authorization from this court is not required, see Breard v. Pruett, ___ F.3d

___, ___, 1998 WL 19920, at *2 (4th Cir. 1998) (holding that preAEDPA law applies if habeas corpus proceeding filed before

AEDPA's effective date) (citing Howard v. Moore , 131 F.3d 399, 403

(4th Cir. 1997) (en banc)), we vacate the district court's order and

remand for further proceedings.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0861**
EXHIBIT32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Faces East EntertainmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley L. Teeple, Secretary/Treasurer andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/StanleyL. Teeple            
StanleyL. Teeple

Secretary/Treasurerand

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

November 22, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11219

Summary Calendar

DANIEL RANDOLPH, Jr.

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TEXACO INCORPORATION; CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY

COMPANY; DAVID K. LINE

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

No: 6:11-CV-23

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Daniel Randolph is a state inmate acting pro se who filed suit

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and a variety of other federal laws against the

defendants alleging that he was denied workman’s compensation, wrongfully

discharged, subjected to racial discrimination, hostility and retaliation, and

denied medical treatment. This federal action was filed after an adverse

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 28, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-11219 Document: 00511903952 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2012
No. 11-11219

judgment rendered in Crockett County, Texas on his action for worker’s

compensation against his employer. After an independent review of the record,

we agree with the district court that although plaintiff couches his complaint in

terms of a civil action alleging violations of his constitutional rights under the

Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, as well as the Texas Constitution,

plaintiff is essentially attacking the judgment issued by the District Court of

Crockett County, Texas, and affirmed by state appellate courts. Under the

Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the federal district court correctly determined that

this collateral attack on a state court judgment was precluded. See Rooker v.

Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415 (1923); District of Columbia Court of

Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). See also Exxon Mobil Corp. v.

Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005). “[L]itigants may not obtain

review of state court actions by filing complaints about those actions in lower

federal courts cast in the form of civil rights suits.” Hale v. Harney, 786 F.2d

688, 691 (5th Cir. 1986); Liede v. State Bar of Texas, 18 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir.

1994); United States v. Shephard, 23 F.3d 923, 924 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Accordingly, we agree that the plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim

and is frivolous. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons stated by the district

court in its Order dated November 14, 2011, we AFFIRM the district court’s

judgment. 

2

Case: 11-11219 Document: 00511903952 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2012
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7794

AHMAD CLARENCE GARLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, SCDC; C. RUSHTON, Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution; L. CARTLEDGE, Associate Warden, MCCI, C. KENDALL, Associate Warden, MCCI; S. LEWIS, Major, MCCI; I. CULBREATH, IGC, MCCI; GEORGE LONG, MCCI; J. REED, MCCI; RICHARD P. STROKES; PHILIP MORRIS, USA, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 01-6091

AHMAD CLARENCE GARLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, SCDC; C. RUSHTON, Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution; L. CARTLEDGE, Associate Warden, MCCI; C. KENDALL, Associate Warden, MCCI; S. LEWIS, Major, MCCI; I. CULBREATH, IGC, MCCI; GEORGE LONG, MCCI; J. REED, MCCI; RICHARD P. STROKES; PHILIP MORRIS, USA, Defendants - Appellees.2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge; Terry L. Wooten, Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-3024-4-19BF) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 29, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ahmad Clarence Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Ahmad Clarence Garland filed a civil action against Defendants alleging that they violated Garland’s civil rights. Garland now appeals the district court’s order clarifying its intent to dismiss only Phillip Morris as a Defendant in the action (Appeal No. 00-7794), and a separate order by the magistrate judge denying Garland’s motion for the appointment of counsel (Appeal No. 01-6091). We dismiss these consolidated appeals for lack of jurisdiction because the subject orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. We therefore grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss in Appeal No.01-6091, and we dismiss these appeals as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Mobility
Electronics, Inc. (the Company), each certifies that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification: 1. The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. May 10, 2005
    
    /s/ Charles R. MolloCharles R. MolloPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Joan W. BrubacherJoan W. BrubacherChief Financial Officer
**Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade (AES-BB)
A product of the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0497

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RICHARD JAMES SORIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including March 14, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

JMK

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 3 2022

02/03/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0497
§ 9.22 Wage and Hour Division investigation. ( a ) *Initial investigation.* The Administrator may initiate an investigation under this part either as the result of a complaint or at any time on the Administrator's own initiative. The Administrator may investigate potential violations of, and obtain compliance with, the Executive Order. As part of the investigation, the Administrator may conduct interviews with the predecessor and successor contractors, as well as confidential interviews with the relevant contractors' workers at the worksite during normal work hours; inspect the relevant contractors' records; make copies and transcriptions of such records; and require the production of any documents or other evidence deemed necessary to determine whether a violation of this part, including conduct warranting imposition of debarment pursuant to § 9.23(d), has occurred. Federal agencies and contractors must cooperate with any authorized representative of the Department of Labor in the inspection of records, in interviews with workers, and in all aspects of investigations.
( b ) *Subsequent investigations.* The Administrator may conduct a new investigation or issue a new determination if the Administrator concludes circumstances warrant, such as where the proceedings before an Administrative Law Judge reveal that there may have been violations with respect to other employees of the contractor, where imposition of debarment is appropriate, or where the contractor has failed to comply with an order of the Secretary.
# Fig 1

# Fig 1

# Fig 2

# Fig 2

# Fig 3

# Fig 3

# Map65+#

# Map 65+%

# Map Incr 95-05

# Fig 6

# Fig 7

# Fig 8

# Fig 8

# Fig 9

# Fig 10

# Fig 10

# MBD003420AD.unknown

# MBD0034CBE4.unknown

# MBD0034AE61.unknown
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.701 Alloway Creek. ( a ) The draws of the Salem County bridges, miles 5.1 at Hancocks Bridge, and 6.5 at New Bridge, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the S49 bridge, mile 9.5 at Quinton, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

#### § 20.79 Examination of records relating to the claim; opportunity for full explanation of the claim.

Following receipt of the notice specified in § 20.78(b), the debtor may request to examine and copy agency records pertaining to the debt.
### Hydrologic data, Wind River and Fifteen Mile Creek basins, Wyoming, 1947-54

By: Norman Julius King

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1475A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
ALLONGE TO WARRANT TO PURCHASE 1,200,000
SHARES


 


This Allonge (this
“Allonge”) to that certain warrant issued by Mandalay Media, Inc., now known as NeuMedia, Inc., (the “Company”)
to Vivid Entertainment, LLC (“Holder”) to purchase up to a total of 1,200,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value
per share (“Common Stock”) of the Company, at an exercise price equal to $1.25 per share (the “Warrant”), is
made and entered into as of January 1, 2011, by and between the Company and the Holder, and is firmly affixed to and made a part
of the Warrant.


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder hereby agree that the Warrant
is hereby amended as set forth below. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Warrant.


 


1.     All references
to “1,200,000 shares of Common Stock” are hereby deleted and “1,500,000 shares of Common Stock” is hereby substituted
in its place.


 


2.     The Exercise
Price of “$1.25 per share” is hereby deleted and “$0.25 per share” is hereby substituted in its place.


 


3.     All references
to the “Warrant” and any other instrument or document delivered in connection therewith shall be deemed to mean the Warrant
as amended by this Allonge.


 


4.     As hereby amended, the Warrant
is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left
blank]


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS
WHEROF, THE EXECUTION hereof as an instrument under seal as of the date first set forth above and shall be governed by the laws
of the State of Delaware.


  


	NEUMEDIA, INC.	 	VIVID ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
	 	 	 
	By:	[ILLEGIBLE]	 	By: 	[ILLEGIBLE]
	Name:      	[ILLEGIBLE]	 	Name:    	[ILLEGIBLE]
	Its:	CFO	 	Its:	CEO 


 



    	2
CMVT - 4.30.2012 - Exhibit 10.8






Exhibit 10.8


                                                                                                    


            March 29, 2010


BY US MAIL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL


Mr. Joel Legon
Chief Accounting Officer
43 Chapin Road
Barrington, RI 02806


Dear Joel,


This letter confirms that, as of March 1, 2010, your office location has changed from the New York City, NY office to the Wakefield, MA office.  If you are required to visit the NYC office based on business needs then you will be reimbursed for your expenses according to the Comverse, Inc. travel policy.  The travel policy is available on the corporate intranet via the Traveler portal.


In addition, Comverse will pay you a one-time relocation bonus, in addition to the amounts you have previously received, in the amount of $30,000.00 less statutory withholdings to assist with your relocation expenses. This payment represents the final payment in any compensation owed to you in connection with your relocation.


I hope this addresses any questions you may have.  Please contact me at 212.739.1013 if you would like to discuss further.


Sincerely,
/s/ Shefali Shah
Shefali Shah
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary




















810 Seventh Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10019     Telephone (212) 739-1000 Facsimile (212) 739-1001 www.cmvt.com
Docket No. FAARecord of Discussion f\ 

o l S' -ct -OUJ "' n-~ Directorate Identifier: 4-D 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? --~---- ------------------------~ 

ORGAN IZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

M7 Aerospace LLC Conan Fox 5/4/2015 Concur with the technical 

content in AD 

··--

Other/Additionallnfonnation: 

II
September

Celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month!

Celebrate the cultural diversity and special contributions of the 

largest ethnic minority in the United States, the Hispanic 

community, which reflects many Spanish-speaking countries.

Hispanic Heritage Month

Check out:

o Hispanic Heritage Month Home Page

o "Someday I Will Miss"-A day in the life of a Peace Corps Volunteer in Guatemala

o "Why People are Hairy"-A lighthearted Panamanian folk tale