alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NAICS m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8

483111/483113 0.5 1 1 1 2 5.5 8 16

11411 0 1 1 2 3 5 7 12

483112/483114 0.5 1 1 2 3 10 20 31

483211 1 4 8 12 20 40 90 250

483212 0.5 1 1 1 2 3 5 5

487210 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

488310 0.5 1 1 2.376737 5.317184 12.0295 22.78302 58.54752

488320 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1

488330 0.5 1 2 3 5 8 15 24

488390 0 0.00E+00 0 0 0 0 0 0

213111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m9 m10 m11

40 65 120

20 28 0

38 51 60

500 800 1300

11 0 0

0 0 0

127.4662 0 0

1 1.1 1.2

40 60 80

1 2.5 3

1 1 0
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 441 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 441

Congratulating the New York Giants on their victory in Super Bowl XLII.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2008

    Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. 
Menendez) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the New York Giants on their victory in Super Bowl XLII.

Whereas, on Sunday, February 3, 2008, the New York Giants defeated the New 
        England Patriots by a score of 17-14 to win Super Bowl XLII;
Whereas the Giants, who were double-digit underdogs, overcame overwhelming odds 
        to defeat the Patriots;
Whereas Giants owners John K. Mara and Steve Tisch have built the Giants 
        organization into a championship caliber team;
Whereas Eli Manning, having led a game-winning drive for 83 yards at the end of 
        the fourth quarter, was named the game's Most Valuable Player;
Whereas David Tyree's game-breaking catch will forever go down in Super Bowl 
        history as one of the greatest plays ever;
Whereas the relentless onslaught of the Giants defensive line, highlighted by 
        spectacular plays by Justin Tuck, Osi Umenyiora, and team Captain 
        Michael Strahan, sacked Patriots quarterback Tom Brady 5 times;
Whereas the Giants capped off an amazing playoff run by winning all 4 playoff 
        games on the road as underdogs;
Whereas Giants head coach Tom Coughlin, in his first appearance in the Super 
        Bowl, lead his team to victory from the wild card spot;
Whereas this marks the third time in franchise history that the Giants have won 
        the Super Bowl;
Whereas the Giants attract fans from New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut to 
        their home games in East Rutherford, New Jersey, and to away games 
        across the country; and
Whereas Giants fans from across the tri-state region have rallied together to 
        cheer the Giants for coming from behind to win in the biggest upset in 
        Super Bowl history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the New York Giants on 
their victory in Super Bowl XLII.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35103-35104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Specil Emphasis 
Panel, Molecular Mechanisms of Signaling in Aging and AD.
    Date: May 31-June 1, 2000.
    Time: 7:00 pm to 4:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 35104]]

    Place: Radisson Hotel, 808 20th Street, South Birmingham, AL.
    Contact Person: Louise L. Hsu, PhD, The Bethesda Gateway 
Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-9666.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, The Mechanisms of Alternations of Sleep with Age.
    Date: June 28, 2000.
    Time: 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 7201 Wisconsin, Suite 502C, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Chernak, PhD, The Bethesda Gateway 
Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue/Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-9666.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 24, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13726 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 780.712 Limitation of exemption to establishments with five or fewer employees.

If the operations of an establishment are such that it is commonly recognized as a country elevator, its employees may come within the section 13(b)(14) exemption provided that “no more than five employees are employed in the establishment in such operations”. The exemption is intended, as explained by its sponsor, to “affect only institutions that have five employees or less” (107 Cong. Rec. (daily ed.) p. 5883). Since the Act is applied on a workweek basis, a country elevator is not an exempt place of work in any workweek in which more than five employees are employed in its operations.
§ 2200.203 Commencing Simplified Proceedings. ( a ) *Selection.* Upon receipt of a Notice of Contest, the Chief Administrative Law Judge may, at the Chief Administrative Law Judge's discretion, assign an appropriate case for Simplified Proceedings.
( b ) *Party request.* Within 21 days of the notice of docketing, any party may request that the case be assigned for Simplified Proceedings. The request must be in writing. For example, “I request Simplified Proceedings” will suffice. The request must be sent to the Executive Secretary. Copies must be sent to each of the other parties.
( c ) *Judge's ruling on request.* The Chief Administrative Law Judge or the Judge assigned to the case may grant a party's request and assign a case for Simplified Proceedings at the Judge's discretion. Such request shall be acted upon within 14 days of its receipt by the Judge.
( d ) *Time for filing complaint or answer under § 2200.34 .* If a party has requested Simplified Proceedings or the Judge has assigned the case for Simplified Proceedings, the times for filing a complaint or answer will not run. If a request for Simplified Proceedings is denied, the period for filing a complaint or answer will begin to run upon issuance of the notice denying Simplified Proceedings.
#### § 779.101 Guiding principles for applying coverage and exemption provisions.

It is clear that Congress intended the Fair Labor Standards Act to be broad in its scope. “Breadth of coverage is vital to its mission.” (*Powell* v. *U.S. Cartridge Co.,* 339 U.S. 497.) An employer who claims an exemption under the Act has the burden of showing that it applies. (*Walling* v. *General Industries Co.,* 330 U.S. 545; *Mitchell* v. *Kentucky Finance Co.,* 359 U.S. 290; *Fleming* v. *Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.,* 113 F. 2d 52.) Conditions specified in the language of the Act are “explicit prerequisites to exemption.” (*Arnold* v. *Kanowsky,* 361 U.S. 388.) “The details with which the exemptions in this Act have been made preclude their enlargement by implication.” (*Addison* v. *Holly Hill,* 322 U.S. 60; *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254.) Exemptions provided in the Act “are to be narrowly construed against the employer seeking to assert them” and their application limited to those who come plainly and unmistakably within their terms and spirit; this restricted or narrow construction of the exemptions is necessary to carry out the broad objectives for which the Act was passed. (*Phillips* v. *Walling,* 324 U.S. 490; *Mitchell* v. *Kentucky Finance Co.,* supra; *Arnold* v. *Kanowsky,* supra; *Calaf* v. *Gonzalez,* 127 F. 2d 934; *Bowie* v. *Gonzalez,* 117 F. 2d 11; *Mitchell* v. *Stinson,* 217 F. 2d 210; *Fleming* v. *Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.,* 113 F. 2d 52.)
[670 NE2d 443, 647 NYS2d 159]

#### Raymond Mercer et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

Decided July 9, 1996

*956APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Rosenthal & Druyan,*Bronx *(Alan Jay Binger*of counsel), for appellants.

*Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel*of New York City *(Deborah R. Douglas*and *Kristin M. Helmers*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The evidence presented at trial, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, fails to establish a prima facie case of negligence. Nothing in the record suggests that defendant either affirmatively created the particular pool of grease or oil alleged to have caused plaintiffs fall, or had actual or constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence *(Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*99 AD2d 246, 249, *affd for reasons stated below*64 NY2d 670). Thus, the Appellate Division properly reversed the judgment in plaintiffs’ favor and dismissed the complaint.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-155

C. HOLMES,

Petitioner,

v.

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.; J. DOE #1 

THROUGH J. DOE #X; SCOTT MCCARTHA; MS. SHIPMAN,

Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00004-BHH-MHC)

Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Holmes, Petitioner Pro Se. James Whittington Clement, James B. Hood, HOOD LAW 

FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Respondents. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

C. Holmes petitions for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the district 

court’s orders denying her motion for a de novo determination by an Article III judge and 

denying reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292. Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). In 

order to be reviewed, the interlocutory orders must be certified by the district court in 

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Because the district court did not certify the orders, 

we deny Holmes’ petition for permission to appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 12.1



MGE Energy, Inc.

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2005

(In thousands)



|                                             |         
|-------------------------------------------- | --------
|Earnings                                     |         
|Net Income                                   | $ 32,091
|Equity earnings                              | (4,741) 
|Income distribution from equity investees    | 3,550   
|Federal and state income taxes               | 19,871  
|Interest capitalized                         | (907)   
|Fixed charges                                | 15,417  
|Total Earnings as Defined                    | 65,281  
|                                             |         
|Fixed Charges                                |         
|Interest expense on long-term debt and other | $12,955 
|Interest on rentals*                         | 907     
|AFUDC borrowed funds                         | 155     
|Capitalized interest                         | 907     
|Amortization of debt issuance costs          | 493     
|Total Fixed Charges                          | 15,417  
|                                             |         
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges           | 4.23x   





*Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense

gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
Submitted on record and briefs January 22,

remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed February 10, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*QUINTON LEWIS, *Appellant.*

(9102-30785; CA A73299)

845 P2d 935

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Warren and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*159PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after his probation was revoked. The state concedes that the court erred in modifying the sentence that had been imposed, but execution of which had been suspended. *State v. McBride,*103 Or App 642, 798 P2d 728 (1990). We accept that concession.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.435 Carlin Bayou. ( a ) The draw of the Louisiana and Delta Railroad (LDRR) Bridge, mile 6.4, at Delcambre, shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) The draw shall be maintained in the fully open position for navigation at all times, except during periods when it is closed for the passage of rail traffic.
( 2 ) When a train approaches the bridge, it will stop and a crewmember from the train will observe the waterway for approaching vessels. If vessels are observed approaching the bridge, they will be allowed to pass prior to lowering the bridge. The crewmember will verify that the adjacent highway bridge is in the closed-to-navigation position prior to initiating the lowering sequence.
( 3 ) After the train has completely passed over the bridge, the crewmember will initiate the raising sequence.
( 4 ) To request openings of the bridge when the lift span is in the closed-to-navigation position, mariners may call the LDRR Signal Supervisor at 337-316-6015.
( b ) The draw of the S14 bridge, mile 6.4 at Delcambre, shall open on signal; except that, from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given. The draw shall open on less than four hours notice for an emergency and shall open on demand should a temporary surge in waterway traffic occur.
[CGD8-88-19, 54 FR 16107, Apr. 21, 1989. Redesignated by CGD08-96-053, 64 FR 8722, Feb. 23, 1999; USCG-2012-0180, 77 FR 57021, Sept. 17, 2012]
132 STAT. 4164 PUBLIC LAW 115–275—NOV. 3, 2018 

Public Law 115–275 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize the National Emergency Medical Services Memorial Foundation to 

establish a commemorative work in the District of Columbia and its environs, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH COMMEMORATIVE WORK. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The National Emergency Medical Services 

Memorial Foundation may establish a commemorative work on 

Federal land in the District of Columbia and its environs to 

commemorate the commitment and service represented by emergency medical services. 

(b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMORATIVE

WORKS.—The establishment of the commemorative work under this 

section shall be in accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, United 

States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’). 

(c) PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Federal funds may not be used to pay 

any expense of the establishment of the commemorative work 

under this section. 

(2) RESPONSIBILITY OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL

SERVICES MEMORIAL FOUNDATION.—The National Emergency 

Medical Services Memorial Foundation shall be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions for, and payment of the 

expenses of, the establishment of the commemorative work 

under this section. 

(d) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If upon payment of all expenses for the 

establishment of the memorial (including the maintenance and 

preservation amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, 

United States Code), there remains a balance of funds received 

for the establishment of the commemorative work, the Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary 

of the Interior for deposit in the account provided for in section 

8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code. 

(2) ON EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—If upon expiration of 

the authority for the commemorative work under section 

8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, there remains a balance 

of funds received for the establishment of the commemorative 

work, the Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance 

to a separate account with the National Park Foundation for 

memorials, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior 

or Administrator (as appropriate) following the process provided 

in section 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States Code, for accounts 

40 USC 8903 

note. 

Nov. 3, 2018 

[H.R. 1037] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–275—NOV. 3, 2018 132 STAT. 4165 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1037 (S. 1692): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–669 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–249 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources) accompanying S. 1692. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

July 17, 18, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

established under 8906(b)(2) or (3) of title 40, United States 

Code. 

Approved November 3, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Morton Industrial Group,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, William D. Morton, Chairman, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, and I, Daryl R.Lindemann, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     /s/ William D. Morton       William D. Morton *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President*March 31, 2006     /s/ Daryl R. Lindemann       Daryl R. Lindemann *Chief Financial Officer and Secretary*March 31, 2006     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on December 22, 1999, Lonza 
Riverside, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made 
application by renewal which was received for processing April 12, 
2000, to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as 
a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Phenylacetone (8501).......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in 
bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than August 1, 2000.

    Dated: May 24, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-13786 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CCBT Financial
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 , as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer for the Company, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),
this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B)
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.




/s/ STEPHEN B. LAWSON, President and Chief Executive Officer
------------------------------------------------------------
 Stephen B. Lawson,  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2003
      ------------------------------------------------------


                                       34