alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6571
TYRONE LORENZO ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Highway Patrol; JOSEPH FRANKLIN CLIPSE, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charle ston. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-01288-SB) Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: June 10, 2009 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in Defendants’ favor in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and denying Robinson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. S.C. Dep’t of Pub. Safety , No. 2:06-cv-01288-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2007; Nov. 5, 2007). We deny Robinson’s motions for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 492 

Amending the majority party’s membership on the Select Committee on Ethics 

for the remainder of the 110th Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 31 (legislative day, MARCH 13), 2008 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the majority party’s membership on the Select 

Committee on Ethics for the remainder of the 110th 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, That Senate Resolution 27 (110th Con2 gress) is amended, effective January 1, 2008, by striking 

3 all from ‘‘ETHICS:’’ through ‘‘72a–1f’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘ETHICS: Mrs. Boxer (Chairman), Mr. Pryor, and Mr. 

5 Salazar’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### § 784.117 Combinations of exempt work.

The combination of exempt work under sections 13(a)(5) and 13(b)(4), or one of these sections with exempt work under another section of the Act, is permitted. Where a part of an employee's covered work in a workweek is exempt under section 13(a)(5) and the remainder is exempt under another section which grants an exemption from the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Act, the wage and hours requirements are not applicable. If the scope of the exemption is not the same, however, the exemption applicable to the employee is that provided by whichever exemption provision is more limited in scope unless, of course, the time spent in performing work which is nonexempt under the broader exemption is not substantial. For example, an employee may devote part of his workweek to work within section 13(b)(4) and the remainder to work exempt from both the minimum wage and overtime requirements under another section of the Act. In such a case he must receive the minimum wage but is not required to receive time and one-half for his overtime work during that week (C.F. *Mitchell* v. *Myrtle Grove Packing Co.,* 350 U.S. 891; *Tobin* v. *Blue Channel Corp.,* 198 F. 2d 245). Each activity is tested separately under the applicable exemption as though it were the sole activity of the employee for the whole workweek in question. Unless the employee meets all the requirements of each exemption a combination exemption would not be available.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Nanoptics, 
Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of a 
prospective license to Nanoptics Inc. to the Government-owned invention 
described as ``GRID-FREE, MODULAR LARGE SCREEN DISPLAY''.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than July 31, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Patent 
Counsel, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, D0012, 53510 
Silvergate Ave., Rm 103, San Diego, CA 92152-5765. Kindly reference 
N.C. 72,844 in all correspondence directed to this matter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Harvey Fendelman, Patent Counsel, 
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Code D0012, 53510 Silvergate 
Ave., Rm 103, San Diego, CA 92152-5765, telephone (619) 553-3001.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404)

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
J.L. Roth,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13392 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
EXHIBIT 23.2





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. on Form S-4 (File No. 333-35955) of our
report dated March 2, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Keystone Consolidated Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Dallas, Texas
March 24, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5477-N-33]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Juanita Perry, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*      ( print page 51998)                        No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: August 11, 2011.

 Mark R. Johnston,

 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2011-20881 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.945 Hatchie River.

The draws of the Illinois Central Gulf railroad bridge, mile 35.0 at Covington, and the Seaboard System Railroad bridge, mile 71.0 at Brownsville, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 441 

Congratulating the New York Giants on their victory in Super Bowl XLII. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2008 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. 

MENENDEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the New York Giants on their victory in 

Super Bowl XLII. 

Whereas, on Sunday, February 3, 2008, the New York Giants defeated the New England Patriots by a score of 17- 

14 to win Super Bowl XLII; 

Whereas the Giants, who were double-digit underdogs, overcame overwhelming odds to defeat the Patriots; 

Whereas Giants owners John K. Mara and Steve Tisch have 

built the Giants organization into a championship caliber 

team; 

Whereas Eli Manning, having led a game-winning drive for 

83 yards at the end of the fourth quarter, was named the 

game’s Most Valuable Player; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 441 ATS 

Whereas David Tyree’s game-breaking catch will forever go 

down in Super Bowl history as one of the greatest plays 

ever; 

Whereas the relentless onslaught of the Giants defensive line, 

highlighted by spectacular plays by Justin Tuck, Osi 

Umenyiora, and team Captain Michael Strahan, sacked 

Patriots quarterback Tom Brady 5 times; 

Whereas the Giants capped off an amazing playoff run by 

winning all 4 playoff games on the road as underdogs; 

Whereas Giants head coach Tom Coughlin, in his first appearance in the Super Bowl, lead his team to victory 

from the wild card spot; 

Whereas this marks the third time in franchise history that 

the Giants have won the Super Bowl; 

Whereas the Giants attract fans from New York, New Jersey, 

and Connecticut to their home games in East Rutherford, 

New Jersey, and to away games across the country; and 

Whereas Giants fans from across the tri-state region have 

rallied together to cheer the Giants for coming from behind to win in the biggest upset in Super Bowl history: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the New 

2 York Giants on their victory in Super Bowl XLII. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

COPAN ITALIA SPA, COPAN INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

NEST SCIENTFIC INC., NEST SCIENTFIC USA, 

JIANGSU CHANGFENG MEDICAL INDUSTRY CO., 

LTD., BIOTEKE CORPORATION (WUXI) CO., LTD., 

MIRACLEAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., WUXI 

NEST BIOTECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,

Intervenors

______________________ 

2023-1668

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1279.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JAMES M. WODARSKI, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA, argued for appellants. 

Also represented by PETER CUOMO, MICHAEL NEWMAN,

DANIEL B. WEINGER. 

Case: 23-1668 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2023
 CATHY CHEN, Office of the General Counsel, United 

States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L.

BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, BENJAMIN S. RICHARDS,

SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG. 

 BRIAN R. NESTER, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors.

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 7, 2023

Date

Case: 23-1668 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2023
#### § 94.635 Drug-free workplace.

*Drug-free workplace* means a site for the performance of work done in connection with a specific award at which employees of the recipient are prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 27, 2021

No. 04-20-00058-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH CURTIS ANDREWS, DECEASED

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-04-0239-CVW

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On June 9, 2021, this court issued an opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment. On 

July 22, 2021, appellant filed a motion for rehearing. After considering the arguments raised by 

appellant, the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 411 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of Texas civil rights 

pioneer Dr. Hector P. Garcia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19 (legislative day, DECEMBER 18), 2007 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of 

Texas civil rights pioneer Dr. Hector P. Garcia. 

Whereas Hector P. Garcia was born on January 17, 1914, 

in Llera, a small town in south central Tamaulipas, Mexico; 

Whereas Hector P. Garcia was brought to Mercedes, Texas, 

as a small child when his parents fled the Mexican Revolution in 1917; 

Whereas Dr. Hector P. Garcia graduated from the University 

of Texas Medical School in 1940, and later joined the 

United States Army; 

Whereas Dr. Hector P. Garcia served as an infantryman, a 

combat engineer, and a medical doctor during World War 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

SRES 411 ATS 

II, and earned the Bronze Star medal with six battle 

stars for his distinguished service; 

Whereas Dr. Hector P. Garcia founded the American GI 

Forum in 1948 to fight for equal treatment of MexicanAmerican veterans, including proper medical treatment 

and educational benefits; 

Whereas, in 1949, Dr. Hector P. Garcia secured a burial 

with full military honors at Arlington National Cemetery 

for Pvt. Felix Longoria after a Texas funeral home refused to hold a wake for Pvt. Longoria, a U.S. soldier 

killed during World War II, for the sole reason that he 

was Hispanic; 

Whereas President Lyndon Johnson made Dr. Hector P. 

Garcia the first Mexican-American to serve as an ambassador to the United Nations; 

Whereas Dr. Hector P. Garcia was the first Hispanic to serve 

on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights; 

Whereas, in 1984, President Ronald Reagan bestowed upon 

Dr. Hector P. Garcia the Presidential Medal of Freedom; 

Whereas Dr. Hector P. Garcia devoted his life to fighting for 

civil rights and educational access for Mexican-Americans; and 

Whereas this Nation has benefited from Dr. Hector P. Garcia’s legacy of generosity and commitment to equality: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life of Dr. Hec2 tor P. Garcia, a selfless physician, decorated World War 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

SRES 411 ATS 

1 II veteran, dedicated family man, and civil rights hero, 

2 and joins in the celebration of his birthday, January 17. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### § 452.88 Resumption of good standing.

While it is permissible for a labor organization to deny the right to vote to those delinquent in paying their dues (with the exceptions noted) or to those who have been suspended or disciplined in accordance with section 101(a)(5) of the Act, a provision under which such persons are disqualified from voting for an extended period of time after payment of back dues or after reinstatement would not be considered reasonable. After a member has resumed his good-standing status, it would be unreasonable to continue to deprive him of his right to vote for a period longer than that for a new member. A new member may reasonably be required to establish a relationship with the union by remaining in good standing for a continuous period of time, e.g., 6 months or a year, before being permitted to vote in an election of officers. However, while the right to vote may be deferred within reasonable limits, a union may not create special classes of nonvoting members.
#### § 458.1 General.

The term *LMRDA* means the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, as amended (29 U.S.C. 401 *et seq.*). Unless otherwise provided in this part or in the CSRA or FSA, any term in any section of the LMRDA which is incorporated into this part by reference, and any term in this part which is also used in the LMRDA, shall have the meaning which that term has under the LMRDA, unless the context in which it is used indicates that such meaning is not applicable. In applying the standards contained in this subpart the Director will be guided by the interpretations and policies followed by the Department of Labor in applying the provisions of the LMRDA and by applicable court decisions.

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-38880) pertaining to the 1987 Stock
Option Plan, the 1992 Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Stock
Option Plan, the 2000 Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the Advisory
Agreements of our report dated January 30, 2004, except for Note 15, as to which
the date is February 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Tanox, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2003.

                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas
March 10, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.268 Billy's Creek.

The draw of the State Road 80 bridge at Fort Myers need not be opened for the passage of vessels; however, the draw shall be restored to operable condition within 6 months after notification by the District Commander to do so.

[CGD 07-98-009, 63 FR 67402, Dec. 7, 1998]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 99N-4933]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; FDA Safety Alert/Public Health Advisory Readership Survey

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``FDA Safety Alert/Public Health 
Advisory Readership Survey'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 22, 2000 
(65 FR 15345), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-341. 
The approval expires on May 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: May 26, 2000.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 00-13743 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
§ 104.300 General. ( a ) The Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) is a written document that is based on the collection of background information and the completion and analysis of an on-scene survey.
( b ) A single VSA may be performed and applied to more than one vessel to the extent that they share physical characteristics and operations.
( c ) Third parties may be used in any aspect of the VSA if they have the appropriate skills and if the Company Security Officer (CSO) reviews and accepts their work.
( d ) Those involved in a VSA should be able to draw upon expert assistance in the following areas: ( 1 ) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
( 2 ) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
( 3 ) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of persons who are likely to threaten security;
( 4 ) Techniques used to circumvent security measures;
( 5 ) Methods used to cause a security incident;
( 6 ) Effects of dangerous substances and devices on vessel structures and equipment;
( 7 ) Vessel security requirements;
( 8 ) Vessel-to-vessel activity and vessel-to-facility interface business practices;
( 9 ) Contingency planning, emergency preparedness and response;
( 10 ) Physical security requirements;
( 11 ) Radio and telecommunications systems, including computer systems and networks;
( 12 ) Marine engineering; and
( 13 ) Vessel and port operations.
[USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39302, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60515, Oct. 22, 2003]
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03521

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.