alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Affiliated ComputerServices, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [Intentionally omitted]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 9, 2004 /s/ Jeffrey A. Rich   Jeffrey A. Rich   Chief Executive OfficerAffiliated Computer Services, Inc.
The Aging Network

Program Instructions

OMB No 0980-0009 

EXPIRES 7/31/2005 

Certification of Maintenance of Effort

CERTIFICATION OF STATE RESOURCES EXPENDED, UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT 

OF 1965, AS AMENDED, TO MEET THE REQUIRED LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT DURING 

FISCAL YEAR________

STATE:_____________________

I, the undersigned, certify that the State resources expended to meet the maintenance of effort 

required by Title III of the Older Americans Act, under the approved State plan, for the period of 

October 1, 199~ through September 30, 1999 were $_________.

This amount is (check one):

[ ] Less than the required level of maintenance of effort

[ ] Equal to the required level of maintenance of effort

[ ] More than the required level of maintenance of effort

____________________________

Signature of Authorized State Official

______________

Date
RTI International Focus Group Moderator’s Guide Questions to ask of ACL Grantees

1. Ice Breaker: So that we all get to know each other a little better, we’ll go around 

and introduce ourselves and share one thing that we are looking forward to this 

summer. I’ll start. 

2. Organizational Understanding

a. What types of work do your organizations do? For what populations? In 

what ways?

b. Now let’s talk about how you work with the Administration for 

Community Living (ACL). Please describe the ACL grant your organization 

receives.

2. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Priorities

a. How do you identify the needs of the populations you serve?

b. Thinking about the populations you serve, what topic areas or priorities 

do you focus on most related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)? 

<probe types of diversity (cultural, linguistic, age, disability status, sexual 

orientation, gender identity, veteran status, etc.), methods of supporting 

diversity (Technical assistance, publications, research, advocacy, others)> 

<probe whether DEI priorities are self-selected or established by partners 

(e.g., AAAs)>

c. How did your organization select/determine these priorities? How does 

your population knowledge inform your DEI priorities?

d. What kinds of resources do you have to meet the needs of your DEI 

populations and priorities? 

e. What are the facilitators and barriers/challenges to meeting those 

needs? 

3. Measuring Change

a. How do you measure changes related to your DEI priorities?

b. What, if any, other measurements do you use related to your DEI 

priorities? Do these differ from your ACL data collection and 

measurement?

c. What gaps do you see related to DEI measurement?

4. Where could you use more help?

a. What do you need to bridge the gaps related to your DEI priorities? 

b. What could ACL do better to support your organization to bridge those 

gaps?

c. What else do you think is needed to achieve those goals?

d. What other recommendations do you have?
§ 105.257 Security measures for newly-hired employees. ( a ) Newly-hired facility employees may be granted entry to secure areas of the facility for up to 30 consecutive calendar days prior to receiving their TWIC provided all of the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section are met, and provided that the new hire is accompanied by an individual with a TWIC while within the secure areas of the facility. If TSA does not act upon a TWIC application within 30 days, the cognizant Coast Guard COTP may further extend access to secure areas for another 30 days. The Coast Guard will determine whether, in particular circumstances, certain practices meet the condition of a new hire being accompanied by another individual with a TWIC.
( b ) Newly-hired facility employees may be granted the access provided for in paragraph (a) of this section if: ( 1 ) The new hire has applied for a TWIC in accordance with 49 CFR part 1572 by completing the full enrollment process, paying the user fee, and is not currently engaged in a waiver or appeal process. The facility owner or operator or the Facility Security Officer (FSO) must have the new hire sign a statement affirming this, and must retain the signed statement until the new hire receives a TWIC;
( 2 ) The facility owner or operator or the FSO enters the following information on the new hire into the Coast Guard's Homeport website (*https://homeport.uscg.mil*): ( i ) Full legal name, including middle name if one exists;
( ii ) Date of birth;
( iii ) Social security number (optional);
( iv ) Employer name and 24 hour contact information; and
( v ) Date of TWIC enrollment.
( 3 ) The new hire presents an identification credential that meets the requirements of § 101.515 of this subchapter;
( 4 ) There are no other circumstances that would cause reasonable suspicion regarding the new hire's ability to obtain a TWIC, and the facility owner or operator or FSO have not been informed by the cognizant COTP that the new hire poses a security threat; and
( 5 ) There would be an adverse impact to facility operations if the new hire is not allowed access.
( c ) This section does not apply to any individual being hired as a FSO, or any individual being hired to perform facility security duties.
( d ) The new hire may not begin working at the facility under the provisions of this section until the owner, operator, or FSO receives notification, via Homeport or some other means, the new hire has passed an initial name check.
[USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 3584, Jan. 25, 2007, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39173, July 1, 2013; 78 FR 41305, July 10, 2013; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57712, Aug. 23, 2016; USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10029, Feb. 16, 2023]
§ 500.210 Written notice of determination required. ( a ) Whenever the Secretary determines to suspend or revoke, or to refuse to issue or renew, a Certificate of Registration, the applicant for or the holder of such certificate shall be notified in writing of such determination. ( 1 ) In cases involving a determination relating to a Certificate of Registration applied for by, or issued to, a farm labor contractor, written notice shall also be given to every applicant for or holder of a Certificate of Registration as an employee of such contractor.
( 2 ) In cases involving a determination relating to a Farm Labor Contractor Employee Certificate of Registration, written notice shall also be given to the farm labor contractor of such applicant or certificate holder.
( b ) Whenever the Secretary determines to assess a civil money penalty for a violation of the Act or these regulations, the person against whom such penalty is assessed shall be notified in writing of such determination.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.757 Townsend Inlet. The draw of Townsend Inlet Bridge, mile 0.3 in Avalon, shall open on signal except: ( a ) From 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the fourth Sunday in March of every year, the draw need not open for vessels. If the fourth Sunday falls on a religious holiday, the draw need not open from 9:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the third Sunday of March of every year.
( b ) From 11 p.m. on December 24 until 11 p.m. on December 25, the draw need open only if at least two hours notice is given.
[USCG-2007-0026, 73 FR 5749, Jan. 31, 2008]
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Bravito Gonzales, * From the 104th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 17461B.

Vs. No. 11-11-00359-CR * June 12, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 45

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award was established by Sam Lamantia in 1978 in 
        honor of Ed Block, the head athletic trainer of the Baltimore Colts and 
        a respected humanitarian;
Whereas each year in Baltimore, Maryland, the Foundation honors recipients from 
        the National Football League who have been chosen by their teammates as 
        exemplifying sportsmanship and courage;
Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award has become one of the most esteemed honors 
        bestowed upon players in the NFL;
Whereas the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation has grown from a Baltimore-based 
        local charity to the Courage House National Support Network for Kids 
        operated in partnership with 17 NFL teams in their respective cities; 
        and
Whereas Courage Houses are facilities that provide support and care for abused 
        children and their families in these 17 locations across the country: 
        Baltimore, Maryland, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Chicago, Illinois, Miami, 
        Florida, Detroit, Michigan, Dallas, Texas, Westchester County, New York, 
        Oakland, California, Seattle, Washington, Charlotte, North Carolina, 
        Cleveland, Ohio, Atlanta, Georgia, St. Louis, Missouri, Indianapolis, 
        Indiana, Buffalo, New York, San Francisco, California, and Minneapolis, 
        Minnesota: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) National Courage Month provides an opportunity to 
        educate the people of the United States about the positive role 
        that professional athletes can play as inspirations for 
        America's youth; and
            (2) the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation should be 
        recognized for its outstanding contributions toward helping 
        those affected by child abuse.

            Passed the Senate October 3, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 45

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the Ed Block Courage Award Foundation for its work in aiding 
children and families affected by child abuse, and designating November 
                    2007 as National Courage Month.
```
#### Evelyn Kannatt et al., Appellants, v Valley Forge Insurance Company, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted August 12, 1996;

decided October 22, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
# Fig 1

# Fig 1

# Fig 2

# Fig 2

# Fig 3

# Fig 3

# Map65+#

# Map 65+%

# Map Incr 96-06

# Fig 6

# Fig 7

# Fig 8

# Fig 8

# Fig 9

# Fig 10

# Fig 10

# MBD003DB523.unknown

# MBD004A3D43.unknown

# MBD003CDC86.unknown
Argued and submitted October 28,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing December 16, 1992,

opinion withdrawn pursuant to ORAP 8.05(2) and convictions vacated February 17, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DEBRA ANN WILSON, *Appellant.*

(91C21009; CA A74410)

842 P2d 814

Diane L. Alessi, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*264PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals convictions for three burglaries in the first degree. ORS 164.225. Each offense was committed after November 1, 1989, and, therefore, is subject to the sentencing guidelines. The court imposed sentences of 10 years on each charge pursuant to ORS 137.635, which exceeds the guidelines. The maximum sentence that may be imposed under ORS 137.635 is subject to the limitations of the guidelines. *State v. Haydon,*116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:03 AM

To: 'admin@droneforcestudios.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Drone Force Sudios LLC (Docket No.
FAA-2015-1224)



### July 27, 2015

Dear Mr. Kadiwal:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1224). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by August 10, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.150 Connection Slough.

The draw of the Reclamation District No. 2027 bridge between Mandeville and Bacon Islands, mile 2.5 near Stockton, from May 15 through September 15, shall open on signal between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., and it shall open upon 12 hours advance notice between the hours of 5 p.m. and 9 a.m.; and from September 16 through May 14 the draw shall open upon 12 hours advance notice between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., and it shall open upon 24 hours advance notice between the hours of 5 p.m. and 9 a.m. Advance notice shall be given to the drawbridge operator by telephone at (209) 464-2959 or (209) 464-7928 weekdays between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., and at (209) 993-8878 all other times.

[USCG-2008-1141, 74 FR 30227, June 25, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.125 What are the requirements for the malfunction detection system? ( a ) Each oil and natural gas system, between a pumping platform complex and the shore, must have a system that can detect and locate leaks and other malfunctions, particularly in high-risk areas.
( b ) The marine transfer area on an oil deepwater port must be equipped with a monitoring system in accordance with § 154.525 of this chapter.
( c ) A natural gas deepwater port must be equipped with gas detection equipment adequate for the type of transfer system, including storage and regasification, used. The Commandant (CG-5P) will evaluate proposed leak-detection systems for natural gas on an individual basis.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39178, July 1, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.1081 Black River.

The drawspan of the Canadian Pacific Railroad Bridge, mile 1.0, at La Crosse, Wisconsin is operated by remote operator located at the Canadian Pacific Railway Minneapolis Operations Center, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Drawspan shall open upon demand by contacting remote operator via VHF-FM Channel 16 or telephone (612) 851-5784.

[USCG-2011-0937, 77 FR 69761, Nov. 21, 2012, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44281, July 27, 2015]
EXHIBIT 10(xi)

DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



Agreement made on December 19, 2002 between Elysio Capital Corp., with office located at 1075 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3C9 referred to as Creditor and Sona Development Corp. with offices located at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.



SECTION ONE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATION



The parties acknowledge that Debtor is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $89,866.96 as the result of loans extended by Creditor in 2001.



SECTION TWO
AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT METHOD OF PAYMENT



Debtor and Creditor desire and agree, to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms an provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment for same contained in the original loan obligation as described in Section One above.



SECTION THREE
CONSIDERATION



In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:



|a. | Method of Payment:Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in Section One, above, 898,670 shares of Debtor's common stock, valued at $0.10 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of loans provided by Creditor to Debtor.      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Creditor's board of directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 898,670 shares of Debtor's common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.



In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.



Sona Development Corp.

/s/ Nora CoccaroBy: Nora Coccaro, President

Elysio Capital Corp.

/s/ Altaf Nazerali,By: Altaf Nazerali, President

- 30 -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# AWALANG l N

FtcdLeumer E nvironmental Protection .t \gcncy Office of Sci e

n ce and T echnology · · 1200 Pe nns ylv ania A ven ue N orth West Washlngto n , D. <;.**~046 0**  ·
To \\-'hom It May Concern: July 8th , 2014
Thank y ou for inviting the Qawalangin T nb e of Unalaska
. to provide input and express our co ncerns regarding the EPA's in te nt to form ally propose an interpretive rule of the Clea n Water Act (CWA) Section 5 1 8 (e) in th e Fe d e ral Register. A s a federall y recognized tribe, it is our utmost priori ty to exerci se our authority and protect our Alaskan NatiYe Tribal members' · rights. Al though there are states where Indian rese rvati ons exi s t, i t appe ars that in Alaska , the reint erp retation of CWA 518(e ) pwv-isi o ns for Treatment A s a S tat e (fAS) will mak e li ttl e to n o difference on o ur g m Tcmmt. "1.1 t to governmen t co nsultati o n pr oc ess . Hm .\ ' Cve r, m o ving fo rward we ur

g e th e E PA to continu e be in g mindful of our inh eren t rights as a so vereign na tion. Our traditi o nal, cult:ural, an d co mmunity ties are .connec ted to the water quality of this re gion and we wo uld like to see the contin uance of trib al consul tation on matters, s uch a s this, re late d to p ropose d changes and reinterpretati o n s of EPA regulation s on a fe der al l evel. Th rough this proces s, elevat e d discussi o n s on this iss ue amongst our tribal members ha ve taken p lac e and we a p prec iate you offering us an opportuni ty to provi de input. Please tak e thi s as o ur o fficial sta te ment on the EPA' s prop . osition to**reint erp** **t** the CWA se ction 518(e). Sincerely ,

# ~\U-c_**~** Qaw ala ngin T nbe of Unhlaska Presl.dent Tho ma s R o b in so n ·:



### .. 

### ·

,• . 1
. _ .. , •. ' ..**~ ~,**  \ 

### ·'\


### . ":'\ v ·.- . 

### "r-·**~** P
. O
. Box 334, Unal as ka. Alaska 996 85 • 

### ......**~** O FFICE : ( 907) 581

- 2920 FAX (907) 5 81-3644