51432 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices 

Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, 

as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

August, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21054 Filed 8–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,520; TA–W–70,520A] 

The Boeing Company; Amended 

Certification Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

In The Matter of: TA–W–70,520; The 

Boeing Company, 

Commercial Aircraft Group; Including OnSite Leased Workers From Comforce 

Corporation, Adecco, Multax, Inconen, CTS, 

Hi-Tec, Woods, Ciber, Kelly Services, 

Analysts Internatinal Corp, Comsys, Filter 

LLC, Excell, Entegee, Chipton-Ross, Ian 

Martin, Can-Tech, IT Services, IDEX 

Solutions (NWCAD), Media Logic, HL YOH, 

Volt, PDS, CDI Corp, Teksystems, Innovative 

Systems, Inc., Murphy & Associates, Dell, PFI 

Tech, RMS and PSC Industrial Services, Inc.; 

Puget Sound, Washington. 

In the matter of; TA–W–70,520A; The 

Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft 

Group; Including On-Site Leased Workers 

From Comforce Corporation, Adecco, Multax, 

Inconen, CTS, Hi-Tec, Woods, Ciber, Kelly 

Services, Analysts Internatinal Corp, Comsys, 

Filter LLC, Excell, Entegee, Chipton-Ross, Ian 

Martin, Can-Tech, IT Services, IDEX 

Solutions (NWCAD), Media Logic, HL YOH, 

Volt, PDS, CDI Corp, Teksystems, Innovative 

Systems, Inc., Murphy & Associates, Dell, PFI 

Tech, RMS And PSC Industrial Services, Inc., 

Portland, Oregon; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply For Worker 

Adjustment Assistance. 

In accordance with section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 

on October 19, 2009, applicable to 

workers of The Boeing Company, 

Commercial Aircraft Group, Puget 

Sound, Washington, (TA–W–70,520), 

and The Boeing Company, Commercial 

Aircraft Group, Portland, Oregon (TA– 

W–70,520A). The notice was published 

in the Federal Register on December 11, 

2009 (74 FR 65794–65795). The notice 

was amended on January 8, 2010 and 

March 26, 2010 to include on-site leased 

workers. The notices were published in 

the Federal Register on January 20, 

2010 (75 FR 3250–3251) and on April 

19, 2010 (75 FR 20385–20386), 

respectively. The workers are engaged 

in activities related to the production of 

large commercial aircraft. 

The company reports that on-site 

leased workers from PSC Industrial 

Services, Inc. were employed on-site at 

both the Puget Sound, Washington and 

Portland, Oregon locations of The 

Boeing Company, Commercial Aircraft 

Group. The Department has determined 

that these workers were sufficiently 

under the control of the subject firm to 

be considered leased workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending the 

certification to include leased workers 

from PSC Industrial Services, Inc. 

working on-site at the Puget Sound, 

Washington and Portland, Oregon 

locations of The Boeing Company, 

Commercial Aircraft Group. 

The amended notice applicable to the 

TA–W–70,520 and TA–W 70,520A are 

hereby issued as follows: 

All workers of The Boeing Company, 

Commercial Aircraft Group, including on-site 

leased workers from Comforce Corporation, 

Adecco, Multax, Inconen, CTS, Hi-Tec, 

Woods, Ciber, Kelly Services, Analysts 

International Corp, Comsys, Filter LLC, 

Excell, Entegee, Chipton-Ross, Ian Martin, 

Can-Tech, IT Services, IDEX Solutions (NW 

CAD), Media Logic, HL YOH, Volt, PDS, CDI 

Corp, Teksystems, Innovative Systems, Inc., 

Murphy & Associates, Dell, PFI Tech, RMS 

and PSC Industrial Services, Inc., Puget 

Sound, Washington (TA–W–70,520), and 

Portland, Oregon (TA–W–70,520A), who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after May 22, 2008, 

through October 19, 2011, and all workers in 

the group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on the date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

August, 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21057 Filed 8–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of July 25, 2011 through July 29, 

2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices 51433 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss or business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–80,093; The Pearlson Company, 

LLC, Montpelier, Ohio: March 7, 

2010. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–80,002; Babcock & Wilcox Power 

Generation Group, Inc., Barberton, 

Ohio: February 15, 2010 

TA–W–80,046; General Aluminum, 

Rome, Georgia: March 14, 2010 

TA–W–80,226; Camco Cedar, Tacoma, 

Washington: June 28, 2010 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–80,107; Muller Martini 

Manufacturing Corp., Newport 

News, Virginia: April 13, 2010 

TA–W–80,149; Doral Manufacturing, 

Inc., Doral, Florida: July 1, 2011 

TA–W–80,158; Flextronics, San Diego, 

California: May 3, 2010 

TA–W–80,169; Boardman Molded 

Products, Kessler Marketing Group, 

Youngstown, Ohio: April 30, 2010 

TA–W–80,181; L’Oreal, USA Products, 

Clark, New Jersey: May 9, 2010 

TA–W–80,237; Inteva Products, LLC, 

Gadsden, Alabama: June 15, 2010 

TA–W–80,255; Technicolor Business 

Group, Camarillo, California: 

October 3, 2011 

TA–W–80,259; Welded Tube of Canada, 

Inc., Delta, Ohio: June 15, 2010 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

TA–W–80,093; The Pearlson Company, 

LLC, Montpelier, Ohio: Negative 

Determinations For Worker 

Adjustment Assistance And 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–208; General Motors Components 

Holdings, LLC, Rochester, New York 

TA–W–80,247; DMAX Ltd., LLC, 

Moraine, Ohio 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–80,015; ACS Commercial 

Solutions, Inc., Liberty, Kentucky 

TA–W–80,028; Affiliated Computer 

Services, Inc., Hillsboro, Oregon 

TA–W–80,052; Lancaster Eagle-Gazette, 

Lancaster, Ohio 

TA–W–80,053; Shiloh Steel Fabricators, 

Bethel Heights, Arkansas 

TA–W–80,057; Orchard Brands, Athens, 

Georgia 

TA–W–80,266; BAE Systems, 

Survivability Systems, LLC, 

Fairfield, Ohio 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–80,013; Robb & Stucky Limited, 

LLP, Fort Myers, Florida 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations Of Petitions For Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

USC 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W–80,012; Siemens Medical 

Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern PA 

TA–W–80,171; Panasonic Corporation 

of North America, Rolling Meadow, 

Illinois 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of July 25, 2011 through July 29, 2011. Copies 

of these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, courier 

services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, 

Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

51434 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2011 / Notices 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations 

also are available on the Department’s Web 

site at http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under 

the searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: August 5, 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office, Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21055 Filed 8–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of August 1, 2011 through 

August 5, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied for 

the firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–80,081; SuperMedia, LLC, Los 

Alamitos, Texas; March 29, 2010. 

TA–W–80,130; Oak Patch Gifts, LLC, 

Eugene, Oregon: April 19, 2010. 

TA–W–80,133; Nevion USA, Inc., 

Oxnard, California; April 26, 2010. 

TA–W–80,276; Foster Needle Co., Inc., 

Manitowoc, Wisconsin; June 30, 

2010. 

TA–W–80,296; B&H Flowers, Inc., 

Watsonville, California; July 31, 

2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–80,254; PI. US Holding, Inc., Fort 

Smith, Arkansas; June 24, 2010. 

TA–W–80,277; Vermont Transformer, 

Inc., Saint Albans, Vermont; July 7, 

2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–80,210; United Solar Ovonic, 

Greenville, Michigan; June 1, 2010. 

TA–W–80,283; Craftwood, Inc., High 

Point, North Carolina; February 7, 

2011. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES