alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO) ARTHUR ANDERSON


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors of Columbia National, Inc.:

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  about  Columbia  National,   Inc.'s
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers and that  Columbia  National,  Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond policy
and an errors and omissions  policy in the amount of $11,000,00 and $11,000,000,
respectively,  for  the  period  January  1,  1999  through  May  12,  1999  and
$13,000,000  and  $13,000,000,  respectively,  for the period  from May 13, 1999
through  December 30, 1999.  Management is  responsible  for Columbia  National,
Inc.'s compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards and for maintaining a
fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy.  Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Columbia National,  Inc.'s compliance
with the minimum servicing  standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination on Columbia  National,  Inc.'s  compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that Columbia  National,  Inc. complied
with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards and that Columbia National,
Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond policy and an errors and omissions  policy in
the amount of $11,000,000 and $11,000,000,  respectively, for the period January
1, 1999 through May 12, 1999 and $13,000,000 and $13,000,000,  respectively, for
the period from May 13, 1999 through December 30, 1999, is fairly stated, in all
material respects.


Arthur Anderson LLP

Vienna, Virginia
February 25, 2000
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.459 Kelso Bayou. The draw of the S27 bridge mile 0.7 at Hackberry, shall operate as follows: ( a ) From May 20, through October 31, the draw shall open on signal from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. From 7 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
( b ) From November 1 through December 22, the draw shall open on signal from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. From 3 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
( c ) From December 23 through May 19, the draw shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
[CGD 08-94-028, 63 FR 40654, July 30, 1998]
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-60678

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY V. WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-351-PS

_________________________________________________________________

April 30, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jimmy V. Williams, a federal prisoner (# 03225-043,) appeals

from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to

vacate his sentence for using and carrying a firearm during a drug

trafficking offense.

Williams argues that his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) firearm

conviction was invalidated by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995). We have reviewed the
-2-

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Because Williams conceded at his guilty plea proceeding

that he had a handgun in his waistband while conducting a sale of

crack cocaine in a pickup truck, the evidence shows that Williams

knowingly “carried” a firearm during and in connection to a drug

trafficking offense. See United States v. Still, 102 F.3d 118, 124

(5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 43 (1997). This conduct

was sufficient to support his § 924(c)(1) conviction. See id.

A F F I R M E D.
§ 553.103 “Same type of services” defined. ( a ) The 1985 Amendments provide that employees may volunteer hours of service to their public employer or agency provided “such services are not the same type of services which the individual is employed to perform for such public agency.” Employees may volunteer their services in one capacity or another without contemplation of pay for services rendered. The phrase “same type of services” means similar or identical services. In general, the Administrator will consider, but not as the only criteria, the duties and other factors contained in the definitions of the 3-digit categories of occupations in the *Dictionary of Occupational Titles* in determining whether the volunteer activities constitute the “same type of services” as the employment activities. Equally important in such a determination will be the consideration of all the facts and circumstances in a particular case, including whether the volunteer service is closely related to the actual duties performed by or responsibilities assigned to the employee.
( b ) An example of an individual performing services which constitute the “same type of services” is a nurse employed by a State hospital who proposes to volunteer to perform nursing services at a State-operated health clinic which does not qualify as a separate public agency as discussed in § 553.102. Similarly, a firefighter cannot volunteer as a firefighter for the same public agency.
( c ) Examples of volunteer services which do not constitute the “same type of services” include: A city police officer who volunteers as a part-time referee in a basketball league sponsored by the city; an employee of the city parks department who serves as a volunteer city firefighter; and an office employee of a city hospital or other health care institution who volunteers to spend time with a disabled or elderly person in the same institution during off duty hours as an act of charity.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Charles R. Mollo, certify that:
1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mobility Electronics,Inc.;
2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
        a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
        b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
        c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
        a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
        b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ Charles R. Mollo  Charles R. Mollo  President and Chief Executive Officer  May 10, 2004  
- 24 -
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00483

- CV

T A ’ N IQUA B UTLER

, Appellant

V

.

B YRON B UTLER

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 467th District

Court

of Dent on County ( 18

- 10967

- 16 )

February 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for w an t of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
### Ground-water reconnaissance of Winnemucca Lake Valley, Pershing and Washoe Counties, Nevada

By: Christie Paul Zones

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1539C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.235 Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. The draw of the Conrail bridge, mile 7.7, is operated by the Delmarva Central Railroad Company and shall open on signal. The following light signals, located in the center of the drawspan on both sides of the bridge, shall be used: ( a ) When the draw is to be opened immediately, one fixed amber light.
( b ) When the draw is not ready to be opened, one flashing red light.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58278, Sept. 18, 2020]
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS NO. AP -76,357

EXP AR TE DE RRIC K

CO LLIN S , A pplic ant

ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 31423CR

IN THE 40 DISTRICT COURT

TH F RO M ELLI S CO UN TY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas C o d e o f C ri minal Procedure , the cler k of t he trial court transmitt ed to this Court t his application for w rit of habe as cor pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted of possession of a controlled substanc e with i ntent to deliver and sente nced to eig hty ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant conte nds that his trial counsel r ender ed inef fec tive assistance beca

use she did not take the a ppropriate steps t o ensure that the trial cour t considere d shock probation while it had jurisdiction to do so. As part of an ag ree ment with the State, Applicant pleade d true to the State’s2

motion to revoke his community supervision in exchang e for , int e r a lia , the State’s re commendation that he be c on sid e re d f

or sh oc k p ro batio n. On

the same da

y , h e ple a de d tr

ue to a mot ion to a dju dic a te in Ellis County Case No. 31659CR and entered into an identical ag ree ment with the State for that

case . Counsel filed a timely motion fo r s h o ck p robation i n Case No. 31659CR and the tria l court issued a “Judgme nt for Shock Probation: Plac ing D efe ndant on Communit y Supervision.” Howe ver, in the instant case, no s u ch motion was made a nd no such judg ment was sig ned, for eclosing applicant’ s relea se to community supervision in the Case No. 31659CR. Trial counse l filed an a ffidavit re sp o n d i n g to applicant’s inef fec tive assistance of counse l alleg ation. Acc ording to counsel, the fa ilure to file the appropr iate motion to bring this case to the trial court’ s attention was due to an “acc ident or m istake.” The t rial court found t hat counse l filed a motion for im position of shock probation i n Case No. 31659CR, but did not do so in t he instant

c a se du e to “a c c ide nt an d mista ke .” Th e tr ia l court ma de no c on c lus ion s of la w o r r e c omm e nd a tio ns . After a rev i ew of the ha

beas r ecor d, this Court has determined that trial c ounsel was ineffe ctive in that counse l did not move for consideration of shock probation in a timely fashionand that su c h in e ff

e c tiv e re pr e se ntatio n p re

jud ic e d a pp lic a nt. We find , th e re fo re , th a t a pp lic a nt i s entitled relief

. Relief is g rante d. The trial court’s May 21, 2008 judgme nt revoking community supervision in Case No. 31 42 3CR in the 40th J udicial District Court of Ellis County is set aside, and a

pplicant is rem an d ed t o the custody of the sher iff of Ellis County to answer

the State’s motion to revoke community

supervision. Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Te x as De partment of Criminal Just iceCorrec tional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.3

Deliver ed: May

26, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Merritt Jesson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pick Ups Plus, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  May 20, 2005
                                                      /s/ Merritt Jesson
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      Merritt Jesson
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit No. 21**

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

**MGE Energy, Inc.**

As of December 31, 2002, the company owned 100% of the  voting securities of the following subsidiaries (all Wisconsin corporations):

- Central Wisconsin Development Corporation - assists new and  expanding businesses throughout central Wisconsin by participating in planning,  financing, property acquisition, joint ventures and associated activities.

- Madison Gas and Electric Company - a regulated utility that  generates and distributes electricity to nearly 130,000 customers in Dane County,  Wisconsin, and purchases and distributes natural gas to more than 126,000 customers  in seven Wisconsin counties.

- MAGAEL, LLC - holds title to property acquired by the company  for future utility plant expansion and nonutility property.

- MGE Construct, LLC - provides construction services for  building new generation to meet the needs of MGE customers.

- MGE Power, LLC - owns real estate and new generating  assets required to meet MGE's growing customer demand. MGE Power plans  to sell the electricity from the new generating assets to MGE through long-term  lease agreements.
§ 100.10 Coast Guard-State agreements. ( a ) The District Commander is authorized to enter into agreements with State authorities permitting, regulation by the State of such classes of regatta or marine parade on the navigable waters of the United States as, in the opinion of the District Commander, the State is able to regulate in such a manner as to insure safety of life. All such agreements shall reserve to the District Commander the right to regulate any particular regatta or marine parade when he or she deems such action to be in the public interest.
[CGFR 63-22, 28 FR 5155, May 23, 1963, as amended by USCG-2003-15404, 68 FR 37740, June 25, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Gaston, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 23, 2005

By: /s/ Bruce Gaston

Name:  Bruce Gaston

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5589-5590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Public Availability of Federal Election Commission, Procurement 
Division FY 2010 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2010 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), FEC 
PROCUREMENT DIVISION is publishing this notice to advise the public of 
the availability of the FY 2010 Service Contract inventory. This 
inventory provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 
that were made in FY 2010. The information is organized by function to 
show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. 
The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on 
November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/

[[Page 5590]]

omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-
11052010.pdf.
    The FEC Procurement Division has posted its inventory and a summary 
of the inventory on the FEC homepage at the following link: http://www.fec.gov/pages/procure/procure.shtml.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Bret A. Zieman, Director of 
Procurement, at 202-694-1225 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8eaf2e1ede5e9e6e8eeedeb86efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90d2cad9d5ddd1ded0d6d5d3bed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 26, 2011.
Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-2035 Filed 1-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>