alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                             EXHIBIT (24)



                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                        -----------------


      Each of the undersigned directors of New England Electric System
  (the "Company"), individually as a director of the Company, hereby
  constitutes and appoints John G. Cochrane, Patricia M. Needham, and Robert
  K. Wulff, individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on behalf of the
  undersigned the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
  December 31, 1996, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
  and to execute any appropriate amendment or amendments thereto as may be
  required by law.
  
  Dated this 25th day of February, 1997.
  
  s/Joan T. Bok                                             s/John W. Rowe
  _________________________           _________________________
  Joan T. Bok                         John W. Rowe
  
  
  s/William M. Bulger                 s/George M. Sage
  _________________________           _________________________ 
  s/William M. Bulger                 George M. Sage
  
  
  s/Paul L. Joskow                                          s/Charles E. Soule
  _________________________           _________________________
  Paul L. Joskow                                            Charles E. Soule
  
  
                                      s/Anne Wexler
  _________________________           _________________________
  John M. Kucharski                                         Anne Wexler
  
  
  s/Edward H. Ladd                                          s/James Q. Wilson
  _________________________           _________________________
  Edward H. Ladd                                            James Q. Wilson
  
  
  s/Joshua A. McClure                 s/James R. Winoker
  _________________________           _________________________
  Joshua A. McClure                                         James R. Winoker
#### § 104.100 Definitions.

Except as specifically stated in this subpart, the definitions in part 101 of this subchapter apply to this part.
§ 780.124 Raising of fur-bearing animals. ( a ) The term “fur-bearing animals” has reference to animals which bear fur of marketable value and includes, among other animals, rabbits, silver foxes, minks, squirrels, and muskrats. Animals whose fur lacks marketable value, such as albino and other rats, mice, guinea pigs, and hamsters, are not “fur-bearing animals” which within the meaning of section 3(f).
( b ) The term “raising” of fur-bearing animals includes all those activities customarily performed in connection with breeding, feeding and caring for fur-bearing animals, including the treatment of disease. Such treatment of disease has reference only to disease of the animals being bred and does not refer to the use of such animals or their fur in experimenting with disease or treating diseases in others. The fact that muskrats or other fur-bearing animals are propagated in open water or marsh areas rather than in pens does not prevent the raising of such animals from constituting the “raising of fur-bearing animals.” Where wild fur-bearing animals propagate in their native habitat and are not raised as above described, the trapping or hunting of such animals and activities incidental thereto are not included within section 3(f).
|          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|     |                                                                                                                                                 |
|  2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                                                     |        |                                                                                      |        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  Stephen M. Lacy                                                                                |   | /s/  Joseph H. Ceryanec                                                              |   |
| Stephen M. Lacy                                                                                     |   | Joseph H. Ceryanec                                                                   |   |
| Chairman of the Board, President,Chief Executive Officer, and Director(Principal Executive Officer) |   | Vice President - Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
|                                                                                                |   |                                                                                 |   |
|  Dated:  August 30, 2010                                                                       |   | Dated:  August 30, 2010                                                              |   |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 155

C. HOLMES , Petitioner ,

v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.; J. DOE #1 THROUGH J. DOE #X; SCOTT MCCARTHA; MS. SHIPMAN , Respondents

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 2:20

- cv - 00004

- BHH

- MHC )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
C. Holmes, Petitioner Pro Se. James Whittington Clement, James B. Hood, H OOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinion s are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
C

. Holmes petitions for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) the district
court’s order s denying her motion for a de novo determination by an Article III judge and denying reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). In
order to be reviewed, the interlocutory order s must be certified by the district court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Because the district court did not certify the order s , we deny Holmes’ petition for permission to appeal. We dispense with oral argument
b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32









                                       24
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Barry E. Backhaus, President and Chief Executive Officer and Katherine A.
Bousquet, Vice President, Treasurer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of First
Federal Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his/her capacity as an
officer of the Company that he/she has reviewed the quarterly report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") and
that to the best of his/her knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

      The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


November 8, 2005                           /s/ Barry E. Backhaus
----------------------                     ----------------------
Date                                       Barry E. Backhaus
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


November 8, 2005                           /s/ Katherine A. Bousquet
----------------------                     -------------------------
Date                                       Katherine A. Bousquet
                                           Vice President, Treasurer and
                                                Interim Chief Financial Officer


                                       25
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMIE JERMAINE BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2278

[March 29, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 56-2015-CF-000478-

B and 56-2016-CF-002437-A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and Anthony Calvello, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
— 

Research shows that when people with disabilities live 

independently and are fully included in communities, with 

proper supports in place, they are happier and healthier. 

Direct Support Professionals (DSPs) play a critical role in 

sustaining the independence of individuals with intellectual 

and developmental disabilities (ID/DD). However, with 

significant challenges to recruiting and an average turnover 

rate of 45%, demand for DSPs far exceeds supply, and many 

people are unable to obtain all of the services they need. 

There are multiple reasons for the difficulties in attracting 

and retaining DSPs. These include the rising need for 

services creating competition for workers, shifts in the 

types of services needed, low wages, lack of benefits, and 

lack of training and promotion opportunities.

To tackle these and other issues, ACL launched the 

stability of home- and community-based services, well as encourage higher expectations for people 

and improve outcomes for individuals with ID/DD. 

Blazing New Trails for Community-Based Direct Support 

Professionals prize competition. The challenge sought 

solvers to develop and pilot models that will transform 

the DSP workforce, and improve the quality and 

Five first-round winners were selected in May 2021 to 

proceed to small-scale testing of their models. In 

August, three finalists will be chosen to compete for the 

final prize.

It is my hope the training modules will foster 

dialogue between providers and individuals, as 

with disabilities in employment, community 

living, access to services, and overall, inclusion 

of people with disabilities in their own planning 

for their future. 

Able South Carolina ” 

CHALLENGE PHASES 

ROUND 1 

Proposal of Innovative Models: 

Five (5) teams awarded a total of 

$100,000 

ROUND 2 

Small-Scale Testing of Models: 

Three (3) teams will be awarded a 

total of

$90,000 

ROUND 3 

Promise of Sustainability

One (1) team will be awarded 

$120,000

ROUND 1 Winners: 

Able South Carolina • Collaborative for Citizen Directed Supports- NJ 

National Alliance for Direct Support Professionals, Inc • RCM of Washington, Inc. • SEEC 

https://acl.gov/DSPchallenge
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.151 Cordelia Slough (a tributary of Suisun Bay).

The draws of the Union Pacific railroad bridge, mile 1.5 at Suisun, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date:  10 a.m., Wednesday, May 31, 2000.

Place:  Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information:  Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information:  You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: May 24, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13425 Filed 3-24-00; 12:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

**** 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

****
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6612

KENNETH COLEMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICKIE HARRISON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-99-3930-2-19AJ) Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Coleman’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Coleman that failureto file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Coleman failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 110.71a [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Troy Financial Corporation (the
"Company,") hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month and six month periods
       ended March 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
       Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
       of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
       Company.

                                            /s/ Daniel J. Hogarty, Jr.
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Daniel J. Hogarty, Jr.
                                                Chairman of the Board, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer
                                                May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Troy Financial Corporation and will be retained by Troy Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       29
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.25-45 Special admeasurement services. If an admeasurer is assigned to measure or certify the tonnage of a vessel at the request of the owner thereof at a place other than a port of entry, a custom station, or port where an officer-in-charge, marine inspection, is located, the owner shall pay the admeasurer's: ( a ) Pay based on the hourly rate for the grade or level of position held or the daily military compensation rate, as appropriate;
( b ) Travel expense based on the estimated cost of travel from and return to the nearest port of entry, customs station, or office of an officer-in-charge, marine inspection; and
( c ) Daily subsistence expense from the time he leaves his official duty station until he returns thereto.
(Title V, 65 Stat. 268, 290; sec. 6(b)(1), 80 Stat. 937; 31 U.S.C. 483a; 49 U.S.C. 1655(b)(1); 49 CFR 1.46(b))
[CGD 72-62R, 37 FR 20166, Sept. 27, 1972]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Communication Disorders Review Committee.
    Date: June 14, 2000.
    Time: 8 am to 6 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007-
3701.
    Contact Person: Melissa Stick, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NIDCD/NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
496-8683.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 10, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-12535 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 7, 2012

d1204 

# Order

December 7, 2012

143942(23)

In re:

SC: 143942

The Honorable SYLVIA A. JAMES, JTC: Formal Complaint No. 88

Judge, 22 nd 

### District Court

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the Judicial Tenure Commission’s Bill of Costs is

considered, and the respondent, Sylvia A. James, is ORDERED to pay costs of $16,500

to the Commission.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.41 Maintaining drawbridges in the fully open position. ( a ) Drawbridges permanently maintained in the fully open to navigation position may discontinue drawtender service as long as the drawbridge remains fully open to navigation. The drawbridge must remain in the fully open position until drawtender service is restored.
( b ) If a drawbridge is normally maintained in the fully open to navigation position, but closes to navigation for the passage of pedestrian, vehicular, rail, or other traffic, the drawbridge must be tended unless: ( 1 ) Special operating requirements are established in subpart B of this part for that drawbridge; or
( 2 ) The drawbridge is remotely operated or automated.
[USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70309, Dec. 4, 2006]
Exhibit 32.2





STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Manasota Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathleen M. Jepson, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such Report.





/s/Kathleen M. JepsonActing Chief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2011