alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") of EME Homer
City Generation L.P. (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his or her knowledge and belief, that:



| |  | /s/GEORGIA R. NELSONGeorgia R. Nelson
Director and President
Mission Energy Westside, Inc.,
General Partner
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith
Director and Vice President
Mission Energy Westside, Inc.,
General Partner 

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EME Homer City Generation L.P. and will be retained by EME Homer City Generation L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
(75 South. 624)

(1 Div. 244.)

#### HOWZE v. STATE.

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 8, 1917.)

Intoxicating Liquors <&wkey;223(l) — Illegal Sale — Pleading and Proof — Variance.

In prosecution for violation of. prohibition law, where the affidavit charged that defendant “sold, offered for sale, kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors,” and' the state had proved sale was made, it was not error to permit evidence of defendant’s possession of whisky at a different time and place, the sale and ’ possession being charged in the alternative, though the state could be compelled to elect upon which charge it would roly.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Intoxicating Liquors, Cent. Dig. §§ 263-267.]

Appeal from Clarke County Court; A. S. Johns'on, Judged

Lem Howze was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

W|. L. Martin, Atty. Gen.,-and Harwell G. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the state.

BRICKEN, J.

The affidavit up'on which the defendant was tried and convicted for violation of the prohibition law contained one count, charging in the usual form that the defendant “sold, offered for sale, kept for sale, or otherwise disposed of spirituous, vin'ous, or malt liquors.” After the state had proved a sale, the trial judge permitted the state to introduce evidence, over the objection of the defendanty of possession ’of whisky at a different time and place. The only question presented for review in this case is whether the court erred in permitting the state to prbve more than one alternative averment of the complaint. The court’s ruling in this connection was free from error. Barefield v. State, 72 South. 293;1 Brooms v. State, 72 South. 691.2 There can he but one conviction under a complaint containing only one count, irrespective of the number of offenses charged therein in the alternative. .But it is permissible for the state to introduce evidence in proof of each of the alternative offenses charged iri the complaint, whereupon the defendant has the right, upon motion, to require the state to elect and thereby ascertain on which transaction shown by the evidence the state relied for a conviction. In the instant case, the defendant was accorded and exercised that right, and the state thereupon elected to pr'osecute for the alleged sale at the home of the defendant. '

*77After an examination of the entire record in this case, there appears no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendant, and therefore the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Moss v. State, 3 Ala. App. 189, 58 South. 62; Barefield v. State, 14 Ala. App. 638, 72 South. 293; Brooms v. State, 15 Ala. App. 118, 72 South. 691.

Affirmed.

1

14 Ala. App. 638.

2

15 Ala. App. 118.
From: Matthew Todd <ToddM@api.org> 

Sent: 08/10/2012 02:25 PM 

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: FCC Slides 

Brenda, 

Attached is a PDF of the slides on FCCs that were presented at our last meeting. Apologize for the 

delay. We added some additional background information to the slides. Let me know if you have 

questions or want to discuss. 

Matt 

Matthew Todd 

Senior Policy Advisor 

API 

202.682.8319 

<< FCC SSM Slides.pdf >>
Submitted on respondent’s motion to dismiss filed September 25, 1992,

appeal dismissed February 17, 1993

#### MIGUEL A. NEGRON, *Appellant, v. G.*H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, *Respondent.*

(CV 91-617; CA A74015)

846 P2d 1173

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for the motion.

Garrett A. Richardson, Multnomah Defenders, Portland, *contra.*

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.

ROSSMAN, P. J.

*192ROSSMAN, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. Petitioner argues that (a) either the prosecutor or petitioner’s lawyer should have arranged for the victim to take a rape test kit and (b) that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for first degree rape, first degree sexual abuse, and second degree kidnapping. The state has moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to ORS *138.660:*

> “In reviewing the judgment of the circuit court in a [post-conviction relief proceeding], the Court of Appeals on its own motion or on motion of respondent and upon receipt of the trial court file and transcript, if any, may dismiss the appeal without oral argument or submission of briefs if it finds that no substantial question of law is presented by the appeal. A dismissal of the appeal under this section shall constitute a decision upon the merits of the appeal.”

We grant the motion.

The post conviction court found:

> “(1) The trial transcript demonstrates that, to reach a decision in this case, the jury had to adopt either petitioner’s story or the victim’s story. The jury chose to adopt the victim’s story. Petitioner’s counsel made every effort, within legal limits, to discredit the victim and to establish petitioner’s story.

> “(2) Because of the conflicting stories, there was no basis for the trial court to enter a Judgment of Acquittal. If the jury chose to believe the victim, which it did, there was more than sufficient evidence to convict petitioner. * * * [L]ack of a rape test kit [was] a peripheral [matter], because the central question was whether the jury chose to believe the petitioner or the victim. Despite [counsel’s] excellent effort to discredit the victim and to present petitioner’s believable story, the jury chose to believe the victim.”

As the state notes, those findings are supported by the record and, therefore, are binding on this court. *Hedin v. Cupp,*304 Or 66, 742 P2d 604 (1987). Because the appeal presents no issue of law, the motion to dismiss is allowed.

Appeal dismissed pursuant to ORS 138.660.
Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation

Private Client Group

(LOGO)Merrill Lynch

4802 Deer Lake Drive East
Jacksonville, Florida 32246-6484
904 218 60OO
800 243 0058

February 25, 2000

Deloitte & Touche LLP
2801 Independence Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32202

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation
and subsidiaries  (the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for
the same  period,  the  Company  had in  effect  fidelity  bond and  errors  and
omissions  insurance  coverage in the amounts of  $200,000,000  and  $17,000,000
respectively.


Michael A. Johnston
Chairman, President/Chief Executive Officer


Lee Lomax
Senior Vice President
Own this business? Edit Company Info 

# Coffeyville Resources LLC, Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC 

### 400 N Linden Street Coffeyville, KS 67337-1900 map Website: View Details Phone: (620) 251-4000

Coffeyville Resources LLC in Coffeyville, KS is a priv ate company categorized under Nitrogenous Fertilizers. Register for free to see additional information such as annual revenue and employment figu res. Companies like Coffeyville Resources LLC usually offer: Petroleum Refining Services. 

### About Coffeyville Resources LLC Is this your company? Claim This Profile



### Coffeyville Resources LLC Business Information Coffeyville Resources LLC also does business as Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC

. Location Type Single Location Annual Sales (Estimated) View Details Employees (Estimated) 250 to 499 SIC Code View Details NAICS Code 324110, Petroleum Refineries Products, Services and Brands Information not found State of Incorporation Information not found Years in Business Information not found 

### Business Categories Oil Refiners (Mfrs) in Coffeyville, KS Nitrogen Fertilizer Plant Petroleum Refineries View newly formed U.S. businesses 

### Company Contacts Is this your company? Claim This Profile

Keith Osborn Vice Presiden t Resa Segure Human Resources Executive Neal Barkley* Manager* Search for more contacts 

# Page 1 of 1 Coffeyville Resources LLC (Coffeyville Resour ces Nitrogen Fertilizer s, LLC) - Coffeyvil

...

4/29/2011 htt p ://www.manta.com/c/mm g vk jp /coffe y ville-resources-llc
#### § 104.135 Equivalents.

For any measure required by this part, the vessel owner or operator may propose an equivalent as provided in § 101.130 of this subchapter.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Eastgate Acquisitions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/   BRIAN LUKIAN  Brian Lukian Chief Financial Officer March 26, 2013    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Vertical Computer System, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008  as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  September
      17, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Richard
      WadeName:
                Richard
      WadeTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by
Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Computer
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                26,567
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        353,381
<ALLOWANCES>                           9,510
<INVENTORY>                           46,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     483,611
<PP&E>                             2,552,270
<DEPRECIATION>                     1,257,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,831,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                313,142
<BONDS>                              429,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              51,280
<OTHER-SE>                           886,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,831,608
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,428,020
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,372,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    16,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       42,218
<INCOME-TAX>                          16,070
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   26,148
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                             14,206
<NET-INCOME>                          40,354
<EPS-BASIC>                           0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.83



</TABLE>
**Exhibit12.1**

 

**SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST**

**Computationof Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

**(dollars inthousands)**

 
|                               |   | **Six Months  Ended  June 30,** |   | **Year Ended  December 31,** |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | **2004**                        |   | **2003**                     |   | **2003** |   | **2002** |   | **2001** |   | **2000** |   | **1999** |   |
| Earnings:                          |   |                            |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                         |   | $                               | 27,310 |                         | $      | 21,860 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   | $ | 58,437 |   | $ | 14,834 |   |
| Fixed charges                      |   | 20,625                          |   | 17,512                       |   | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   | 15,366 |   | 18,768 |   |
| Adjusted earnings                  |   | $                               | 47,935 |                         | $      | 39,372 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   | $ | 73,803 |   | $ | 33,602 |   |
|                               |   |                            |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                     |   |                            |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                   |   | $                               | 20,625 |                         | $      | 17,512 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   | $ | 15,366 |   | $ | 18,768 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |   | 2.3                             | x      | 2.2                          | x      | 2.2 | x | 2.7 | x | 3.3 | x | 4.8 | x | 1.8 | x |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*Agreement No.:*                     011548-004.                 

*Title:*                     Hanjin/Sinotrans Cross Space Charter & Sailing Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., China National Foreign Trade Transportation Corp.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The proposed modification changes the agreement's name; restates the geographic scope; specifies the number of the vessels to be provided by each party, their capacity, and initial rotation; changes slot allocations; and makes other conforming and administrative changes.                

*Agreement No.:*                     011648-003.                 

*Title:*                     APL/Crowley/Lykes/MLL Space Charter and Sailing Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     American President Lines, Ltd., APL Co. PTE Ltd,. Crowley Liner Services, Inc., Crowley American Transport, Lykes Lines Limited, LLC, Mexican Lines Limited, Transportacion Maritima Grancolombiana, S.A. (“TMG”).                 

*Synopsis:*                     The proposed amendment deletes TMG as a party to the Agreement; revises the Agreement's termination and withdrawal provisions; and updates provisions related to vessels, slot allocations, and sub-chartering.                 

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

Dated: May 26, 2000. 

Theodore A. Zook, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13738 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
§ 143.105 Personnel landings. ( a ) Sufficient personnel landings shall be provided on each manned OCS facility to assure safe access and egress. When due to special construction personnel landings are not feasible, then suitable transfer facilities to provide safe access and egress shall be installed.
( b ) The personnel landings shall be provided with satisfactory illumination. The minimum shall be one-foot candle of artificial illumination as measured at the landing floor and guards and rails.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11
 
                             AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION
          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS
                                               NINE MONTHS ENDED ENDED SEPTEMBER
                                                 SEPTEMBER 30          30
                                               ----------------- ---------------
                                                 1997     1996    1997    1996
                                               -------- -------- ------- -------
                                                (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE
                                                             DATA)
<S>                                            <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>
Net income ................................... $167,275 $131,061 $56,802 $35,193
                                               ======== ======== ======= =======
Average shares of common stock outstanding*...   82,532   85,075  81,149  84,934
                                               ======== ======== ======= =======
Earnings per common share* ................... $   2.03 $   1.54 $  0.70 $  0.41
                                               ======== ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
--------
* Restated for three-for-two common stock split in April 1997.
<PAGE>   1

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
     1500 National City Center
     1900 East Ninth Street
     Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3495




                               Form 10-Q, Part II
                                     Item 6
                                   Exhibit 99

                      INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT
                      -----------------------------------

The Board of Directors
The Tranzonic Companies:

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of The Tranzonic
Companies as of November 30, 1995, and the related condensed consolidated
statements of earnings for the nine- and three-month periods ended November 30,
1995 and 1994, and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended November 30,
1995 and 1994. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical review
procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above
for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of The Tranzonic Companies as of
February 28, 1995, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated March 31, 1995, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of February 28, 1995, is fairly presented, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
December 27, 1995