alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002

In Connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Oil and Gas Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Fall, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                |  |                                                 
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                |  | /s/ Steven A. Fall                              
|                | 
|August 14, 2007 |  | Steven A. Fall                                  
|                |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
#### Pace *et al. v.*Goodson.

Fish, C. J.

1. A plea or demurrer which seeks to bring in question the constitutionality of an act of the legislature, upon the ground that it contains matter in the body not referred to in the title, presents no question for judicial determination, when it fails to point out wherein the body of the act contains matter not referred to in its title.

2. A promissory note, signed by the maker thereof in the presence of and attested by an officer authorized to administer oaths, which, after stating the place and date of its execution, reads as follows: “On October 1st next I promise to pay [a named person] 1500 lbs. middling cotton as rent of forty acres of land, more or less, on his place for 1902,” is a contract which falls within the provisions of the act approved December 17, 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 63), which provides, “That when the relation . . of landlord and tenant of agricultural lands . . has been created by written contract duly executed before an officer authorized to administer oaths, it shall be unlawful for any person, during the life of said contract, to employ” the tenant, “or to disturb in any way said relation, without first obtaining the written consent of said . . landlord;” and which gives to the landlord the right to recover of such person damages which “shall be not less than double the annual rental value of the lands rented . . , said value to be fixed at 1,000 pounds of. middling lint-cotton to the plough.”

3. Where, upon the trial of a suit of the character above indicated, no *212written contract between the plaintiff and his alleged tenant was introduced in evidence, and no contract such as contemplated by the statute was otherwise shown to have been in existence between them at the time of the alleged injury to the plaintiff, a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was unauthorized by the evidence.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 20, 1906.

Action for penalty. Before Judge Beagan. Terrell superior court. December 7, 1905.

*H. A. Wilkinson,*for plaintiffs in error. *M. G. Edwards,*contra..

4. The demurrer to the petition was properly overruled; but the court should have granted a new trial upon the general grounds of the motion ' .therefor. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SEC. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the filing by Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”)of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2005 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Barry M.  Portnoy |                                   | /s/ David J.  Hegarty |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barry M. Portnoy      | David J. Hegarty                       |
| Managing Trustee      | President and  Chief Operating Officer |
|                  |                                   |
|                  |                                   |
| /s/ Gerard M.  Martin |                                   | /s/ John R.  Hoadley  |   |
| Gerard M. Martin      | John R. Hoadley                        |
| Managing Trustee      | Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 511 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 511

  Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 2008

  Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Obama, Mr. Coburn, Mrs. 
 Clinton, and Mr. Webb) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             April 24, 2008

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

                             April 30, 2008

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for 
        the Office of the President, a person must be a ``natural born Citizen'' 
        of the United States;
Whereas the term ``natural born Citizen'', as that term appears in Article II, 
        Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;
Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to 
        limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in 
        the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their 
        country's President;
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of 
        the ``natural born Citizen'' clause of the Constitution of the United 
        States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the 
        term ``natural born Citizen'';
Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country 
        outside of our national borders;
Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States 
        of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American 
        military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ``natural born 
Citizen'' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 110.50a Fishers Island Sound, Stonington, Conn.

An area on the east side of Mason Island bounded as follows:

Beginning at the shore line on the easterly side of Mason Island at latitude 41°20′06′′; thence due east about 600 feet to latitude 41°20′06′′, longitude 71°57′37′′; thence due south about 2,400 feet to latitude 41°19′42′′, longitude 71°57′37′′; thence due west about 1,000 feet to the shore line on the easterly side of Mason Island at latitude 41°19′42′′; thence along the shore line to the point of beginning.

[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 2, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don E.
Marsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Don E. Marsh
---------------------------
Don E. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer
June 23, 2005
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22
- 0406 MONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, TROUT UNLIMITED EARTHWORKS, AND AM ERICAN RIVERS **,** Plaintiffs / Appellees , v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY **,** Defendant / Appellant, and TINTINA MONTANA INC., Defendant / Appellant, and MEAGHER COUNTY AND BROADWATER COUNTY Defendant / Appellant,
**ORDER GRANTING APPELLANTS’ JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR**

**EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS** Upon consideration of Defendant/Appellant Montana Department of Environmental Quality’s (“DEQ”) and Defendant/Appellant Tintina Montana, Inc.’s (“Tintina”) (collectively, “Joint Movants”) unopposed motion for a 30
- day extension of time, and good cause appe aring, Joint Movants are granted an extension of time to and including February 24 , 2022, within which to prepare, 01/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-04062

serve, and file their reply briefs. Defendant
- Intervenor/Appellants Broadwater and Meagher Counties’ reply briefs are also due February 24, 2023. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 17 2023
#### Mike Kaplan, Appellant, v Mel Sachs, Respondent.

Submitted May 6, 1996;

decided July 2, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that pertains to the seventh and eighth causes of action of the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Colstrip Plant Schematics Available in Hard 

Copy at EPA Region 8 Headquarters.
#### § 780.137 Practices must be performed in connection with farmer's own farming.

“Practices * * * performed by a farmer” must be performed as an incident to or in conjunction with “such farming operations” in order to constitute “agriculture” within the secondary meaning of the term. Practices performed by a farmer in connection with his nonfarming operations do not satisfy this requirement (see *Calaf* v. *Gonzalez,* 127 F. 2d 934; *Mitchell* v. *Budd,* 350 U.S. 473). Furthermore, practices performed by a farmer can meet the above requirement only in the event that they are performed in connection with the farming operations of the same farmer who performs the practices. Thus, the requirement is not met with respect to employees engaged in any practices performed by their employer in connection with farming operations that are not his own (see *Farmers Reservoir Co.* v. *McComb,* 337 U.S. 755; *Mitchell* v. *Hunt,* 263 F. 2d 913; *NLRB* v. *Olaa Sugar Co.,* 242 F. 2d 714; *Mitchell* v. *Huntsville Nurseries,* 267 F. 2d 286; *Bowie* v. *Gonzalez,* 117 F. 2d 11). The processing by a farmer of commodities of other farmers, if incident to or in conjunction with farming operations, is incidental to or in conjunction with the farming operations of the other farmers and not incidental to or in conjunction with the farming operations of the farmer doing the processing (*Mitchell* v. *Huntsville Nurseries,* supra; *Farmers Reservoir Co.* v. *McComb,* supra; *Bowie* v. *Gonzalez,* supra).
blku_ex1022.htm


Exhibit 10.22


 



 


SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO SIXTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE


 







THIS SUPPLEMENT No. 1 TO SIXTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE by and between BLINK COUTURE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company (the “Payee”) entered into as of April 30, 2012, supplements and amends that certain Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note dated as of January 31, 2012 (the “Amendment and Note Restatement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment and Note Restatement.







For value received, the Maker and Payee hereby agree, effective as of the date hereof, that the following provisions shall supplement and become part of the Amendment and Note Restatement:







1.           Additional Advances.  The Parties hereby agree that during the period from February 1, 2012 through April 30, 2012, the Payee has made additional advances to the Maker, in the aggregate amount of $28,286, in payment of the Maker’s operating expenses during that period, so that effective as of April 30, 2012, the total outstanding principal amount due and payable pursuant to the Note is $327,995.







2.           No Further Changes; Full Force and Effect.  The additional advances described in Paragraph 1 above reflect all changes to the Amendment and Note Restatement. All other terms of the Amendment and Note Restatement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, unless and until further supplemented or amended hereafter.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has caused this Supplement No. 1 to Sixth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.


 




	 	

BLINK COUTURE, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Lawrence Field	 
	 	 	Name: Lawrence Field	 
	 	 	Title: President & CEO	 
	 	 	 	 









 




	 	

REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Cindy S. Field	 
	 	 	Name: Cindy S. Field	 
	 	 	Title: Secretary
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Peter-Mark Vogel, hereby certifies, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manas Petroleum
      Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (b) | information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Manas Petroleum Corporation.                                                       

Date: November 15, 2010

/s/ Peter-Mark VogelPeter-Mark VogelChief Executive
Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC00-86-000]

      ( print page 34688)    
Take notice that on May 19, 2000, DTE Energy Company, The Detroit Edison Company and International Transmission Company filed an amendment to their joint application for authorization to transfer jurisdictional transmission assets pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act in the above-referenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protect such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 6, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13490 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 103.300 Area Maritime Security (AMS) Committee. ( a ) The AMS Committee is established under the direction of the COTP and shall assist in the development, review, and update of the AMS Plan for their area of responsibility. For the purposes of this subchapter, Port Security Committees that were established prior to July 1, 2003, according to guidance issued by the Coast Guard, may be considered AMS Committees, provided they conform to the procedures established by this part and satisfy the membership requirements of § 103.305 of this part.
( b ) The AMS Committee will operate under terms specified in a written charter. At a minimum, the charter must address: ( 1 ) The AMS Committee's purpose and geographic area of responsibility;
( 2 ) Rules for membership;
( 3 ) The AMS Committee's organizational structure and procedural rules of order;
( 4 ) Frequency of meetings, to include not less than once in a calendar year or when requested by a majority of the AMS Committee members;
( 5 ) Guidelines for public access to AMS Committee meetings and records; and
( 6 ) Rules for handling and protecting classified, sensitive security, commercially sensitive, and proprietary information.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 OAM 2020 Other Artwork
 Masthead
This header image (JPG, 170KB) is intended for branding printed documents, such as event agendas.
Make Your Mark: May 2020. Visit ACL.gov for more information.
Banner
This banner artwork (PDF, 56KB) is for printed banners and hanging signs. Sized at 4' x 1.5', it is scalable to any size without degradation.
Make Your Mark

                    *Last modified on 02/11/2020*
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living