alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffrey A. Rich, Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer
Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

|                    |  |                                                                                |  | 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Jeffrey A. Rich                                                            |  | 
|                    |  |                                                                                |  | 
|                    |  | Jeffrey A. Rich,
Chief Executive Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
7/8/2014 ARS Project: Sustainable Management of Agricultural Lands and Water Resources in the Upper Washita River Watershed (407939) Annual Report
USDA United States Department Of Agricuture :
ee | Agricultural Research Service Rink?

¥ -
wae

Southern Plains — Grazinglands Rsch. Lab, EIReno, OK _ Great Plains Agroclimate and Natural Resources Research Unit

ARS Home } About ARS ; Help | Contact Us; En Espafiol
1&2) Printable Version = E-mail this page

a You are here: Research /

Enter Keywords Research

Research Project: Sustainable Management of Agricultural

Advanced Search

Lands and Water Resources in the Upper Washita River Project Team

Watershed Steiner, Jean
Browse By Subject "Larry Wright - Re&d

Location: Great Plains Agroclimate and Natural “ Coordinator, NRCS

Resources Research Unit
Project Annual Reports

> Home
> About Us
jy Research | 2005 Annual Report o FY 2008

Programs and Projects o FY 2007
4d.Progress report.

° Subjects of This report serves to document research conducted under a specific o FY 2006

Investigation cooperative agreement between ARS and the Great Plains Resource o FY 2005
> Products & Services Conservation and Development Association. Additional details of

research can be found in the report for the parent CRIS 6218-11130-
> People & Places 003-000, Integration of Climate Variability and Forecasts into Risk- Related National Programs
os Based Management Tools for Agriculture Production and Resource = Global Change (204)
Water Availability and

> Partnering Land surveys have shown that voluntary adoption of conservation © Water Management (211)

practices is limited among land managers. This project develops more

> Careers responsive management approaches for agricultural lands and water
\ resources that account for climate variability and risks. Also

investigated are the quantitative impacts and value of conservation

practices and programs at a watershed scale and dialog about water
quality and water resources among diverse stakeholders. The Great
Plains Resource Conservation and Development Association has
supported a network to encourage farmer adoption of no-tillage and
other conservation practices, have communicated progress in
numerous newsletters, and organized a no-tillage workshop in
collaboration with the Fort Cobb Water Quality Project that was
attended by over 100 farmers.

Last Modified: 05/08/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House

https:/web.archive.or g /web/200905091724 16/http:/Amww.ars.usda.goviresearch/projects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=4079398fy=2005

4
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in the Fruit-Growing and Canning Industries in the State of Washington: A Study of Hours, Wages and Conditions

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Hawkins, Hildred M. (Hildred Moser)					 and 	Manning, Caroline, 1876-1966. 						*Women in the Fruit-Growing and Canning Industries in the State of Washington: A Study of Hours, Wages and Conditions : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 47*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1926,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5364,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Strafford

No. 7302

#### American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local No. 572 v. City of Dover

September 19, 1975

*Fisher, Parsons, Moran & Temple (Mr. Robert FI. Temple*orally) for the plaintiff.

*Douglas C. Gray,*city solicitor, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

On August 22, 1975, twenty union and five nonunion employees refused to punch in their time cards and commence work following a labor dispute. The Dover city manager discharged these employees on the grounds that they violated an existing labor agreement and participated in an illegal strike.

The plaintiffs petitioned the superior court and asked that pending a hearing on the merits the city be temporarily enjoined from hiring replacement employees and for a temporary order reinstating the discharged employees. The Trial Court *(Mullavey,*J.), after hearing, ordered the discharged employees to be reinstated pending a hearing on the merits of the petition. The parties are before this court as a result of a petition by the city asking this court to stay *492the order of the superior court pending a hearing on the merits of plaintiffs’ petition.

In effect, the city is asking for a writ of prohibition. *See State ex rel. Regan v. Superior Court,*102 N.H. 224, 153 A.2d 403 (1959); *State v. Superior Court,*106 N.H. 228, 208 A.2d 832 (1965). The city seeks to restrain and stay action of an inferior court. The petition is within the jurisdiction of this court (RSA 490:4 (Supp. 1973)) but our authority is exercised with caution and forbearance and only when the necessity to act is clear. The order complained of merely preserves the status quo pending a hearing on the merits which shall be held expeditiously. *Hillsborough v. Superior Court,*109 N.H. 333, 334, 251 A.2d 325, 326 (1969); *Manchester Educ. Ass’n v. Superior Court,*109 N.H. 513, 514, 257 A.2d 23, 24 (1969).

*Petition denied.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.403 Wabash River.

See § 117.397, Wabash River, listed under Illinois.

[CGD 92-015, 57 FR 37880, Aug. 21, 1992]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; T35 Training Grant in Pediatric Respiratory, 
Sleep, and Transfusion Medicine.
    Date: September 7, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Stephanie L Constant, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7189, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-443-8784, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a494544595e4b445e59466a444246484304444342044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="31525e5f4245505f45425d715f595d53581f5f58591f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 10, 2011.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20845 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 118.150 Traveller platforms.

The District Commander may require under deck traveller platforms which may significantly reduce the vertical clearance when operated over navigation channels at night to be lighted with quick flashing red lights on each of the four lower corners.

[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16314, May 2, 1986]
**Beware of ‘Free Genetic Testing’ Medicare Scam**

Over the past few years, DNA tests have become more popular across the country. However, unscrupulous people are taking advantage of the buzz around these tests to scam Medicare beneficiaries.

Scammers target Medicare beneficiaries through telemarketing calls, booths at public events, health fairs and door-to-door visits. They offer “free” genetic testing to help recipients avoid diseases or find the right medications.

The scammers claim the testing is covered by Medicare, and therefore is free to the beneficiary. In reality, Medicare only covers genetic testing in limited situations, and only when ordered by the beneficiary’s physician. If a company bills Medicare for genetic testing, and Medicare denies the claim, the beneficiary could be responsible for the entire cost of the test, which can total around $10,000. 

In other cases, the scammers are simply trying to obtain Medicare numbers they can use to steal a beneficiary’s medical identity or to fraudulently bill Medicare for services they did not provide. Such fraud can hurt not just Medicare beneficiaries, but all American taxpayers who contribute to Medicare. 

To avoid being scammed, the Administration for Community Living (ACL) offers this advice to beneficiaries:

· Do not accept genetic testing services, including a cheek swab, from someone at a community event, local fair, farmer’s market, parking lot or other large event.

· Always be cautious about giving out your personal information, including your Medicare number.

· If you receive a genetic testing kit in the mail, don’t accept it unless it was ordered by your physician. Refuse the delivery or return it to the sender and keep a record of the sender’s name and the date you returned the item. 

· Always review your Medicare Summary Notice or explanation of benefits. The terms “gene analysis” or “molecular pathology” may indicate questionable genetic testing. 

If you received a cheek swab or screening that was not ordered by a trusted provider or have concerns about billing errors or possible fraud, contact your local Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP). The SMP program, funded by ACL, helps Medicare beneficiaries protect themselves from fraud, errors and abuse, and detect and report problems if and when they occur. To find your local SMP, visit smpresource.org or call 1-877-808-2468.
### Served: M ay 1 , 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 1 st of May, 2012.

Essential Air Service at

MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI

Under 49 U.S.C. 4173 1 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 200 8

- 0112

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR PROPOSALS AT MERIDIAN, MISSISSIPPI

By Order 2010

- 5

- 28 the Department selected SkyWest Airlines, Inc., d/b /a Delta Connection (SkyWest)

, to provide Essential Air Service (EAS) at Meridia n, Mississippi , for $ 686,489 annual subsidy. The r ate is set to expire on June 30, 2012. With the end of the contract approaching, by

Order 201 2

- 4

- 9, April 13, 2012 , we requested proposals by May 3, 2012

. On May 1, 2012, Silver Airways, Inc., requested a two

- week extension to submit proposals at Meridian, i.e., through May 17

.

We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Meridian are now due on Ma y 17 , 2012.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this docum ent is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
§ 127.1302 Training. ( a ) Each operator of a waterfront facility handling LHG must ensure that each person assigned to act as a person in charge of transfers for the facility has training in the following subjects: ( 1 ) Properties and hazards of each LHG being transferred to or from the facility.
( 2 ) Use of the gas detectors required by § 127.1203.
( 3 ) Use of the equipment for respiratory protection required by § 127.1209.
( 4 ) Basic firefighting procedures, including the use of the portable fire extinguishers required by § 127.1503.
( 5 ) Content and use of the examined Operations Manual and examined Emergency Manual.
( 6 ) The configuration and limitations of cargo systems of LHG vessels.
( 7 ) Procedures for transferring LHG to and from LHG vessels.
( 8 ) Procedures for response to a release of the LHG handled by the facility.
( 9 ) First aid for persons— ( i ) With burns;
( ii ) Needing cardio-pulmonary resuscitation;
( iii ) Exposed to toxic liquid or toxic vapors (if a toxic LHG is handled by the facility); and
( iv ) Needing transport to a medical facility.
( 10 ) Restrictions on access to the marine transfer area for LHG.
( b ) Each person that receives training under paragraph (a) of this section shall receive refresher training in the same subjects at least once every 5 years.
( c ) The operator must maintain, for each person trained, a record of all training provided under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. The operator must retain these records for the duration of the person's employment on the waterfront facility plus 12 months.
( d ) Training conducted to comply with the hazard communication programs required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the Department of Labor [29 CFR 1910.120] or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [40 CFR 311.1] may be used to satisfy the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, so far as the training addresses the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
§ 110.100 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Area A-2.* Consisting of two parts in the outer basin of Fish Harbor on the east and west sides of Fish Harbor Entrance Channel described as follows: ( 1 ) *Part 1.* Beginning at a point at the intersection of westerly side of Fish Harbor Entrance Channel and the outer jetty; thence southwesterly along the jetty about 900 feet to the shore; thence northerly about 500 feet; thence northeasterly about 650 feet, on a line parallel to jetty; thence southeasterly about 500 feet, along the westerly side of Fish Harbor Entrance Channel to the point of beginning.
( 2 ) *Part 2.* Beginning at a point at the intersection of the east side of Fish Harbor Entrance Channel and Fish Harbor mole (outer Fish Harbor); thence northwesterly along channel line about 850 feet to the southerly side of the Fairway; thence northeasterly and easterly along the southerly side of the Fairway, about 478 and 565 feet respectively to its intersection with Fish Harbor mole; thence southerly and southwesterly along the mole to the point of beginning.
( c ) *Area B-1.* Long Beach outer harbor along east side of Pier 400 beginning at latitude 33°44′22.8′′ N., longitude 118°13′51.0′′ W.; thence south to latitude 33°43′54.5′′ N., longitude 118°13′50.0′′ W.; thence southwesterly to latitude 33°43′46.0′′ N., longitude 118°14′13.6′′ W.; thence northwesterly to latitude 33°44′15.3′′ N., longitude 118°14′26.6′′ W.; thence northeasterly to latitude 33°44′25.1′′ N., longitude 118°14′15.6′′ W.; thence easterly to the beginning point.
( d ) *Area C-1.* Long Beach outer harbor between Island Freeman and Island Chaffee beginning at latitude 33°44′20.0′′ N., longitude 118°08′26.2′′ W.; thence west to latitude 33°44′23.5′′ N., longitude 118°09′32.6′′ W.; thence north to latitude 33°44′52.8′′ N., longitude 118°09′33.2′′ W.; thence southeast to latitude 33°44′25.5′′ N., longitude 118°08′26.2′′ W.; thence south to the beginning point.
( e ) *Area E-1.* Long Beach outer harbor northwest of Island Freeman beginning at latitude 33°44′55.0′′ N., longitude 118°09′40.0′′ W.; thence southwesterly to latitude 33°44′37.0′′ N., longitude 118°09′48.5′′ W.; thence northwesterly to latitude 33°44′52.0′′ N., longitude 118°10′32.0′′ W.; thence north to latitude 33°45′11.0′′ N., longitude 118°10′32.0′′ W.
( f ) *Restrictions.* Special anchorage areas B-1, C-1, and E-1 are reserved for barges on mooring balls, unless otherwise authorized by the Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by CGD11-04-005, 71 FR 15036, Mar. 27, 2006]
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–70 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION (H. 

CON. RES. 85) SETTING FORTH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET FOR THE 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND INCLUDING 

THE APPROPRIATE BUDGETARY LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2009 AND 

2011 THROUGH 2014 

MARCH 31, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 305] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 305, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for general debate on H. Con. Res. 85, 

the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010. The 

resolution provides four hours of general debate, with three hours 

confined to the budget equally divided and controlled by the chair 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget and 

one hour on the subject of economic goals and policies equally divided and controlled by Representative Carolyn Maloney of New 

York and Representative Kevin Brady of Texas. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the concurrent resolution. Finally, the resolution provides that no 

further consideration shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the concurrent resolution, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver of all points of order against the concurrent resolution is prophylactic. 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS
#### § 94.100 What does this part do?

This part carries out the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701 *et seq.,* as amended) that applies to grants. It also applies the provisions of the Act to cooperative agreements and other financial assistance awards, as a matter of Federal Government policy.