alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Poultry Outlook            ERS

In 1997, ERS expanded Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook to include information formerly contained in Poultry Outlook. The final issue of Poultry Outlook was published November 18, 1996. This archive report contains detailed analysis and data covering the poultry sector, focusing on production, price, and trade statistics.

----

Frequency of Release:Other

----

Category:Animals and Animal Products:Poultry

Keywords:broiler chickenseggspoultryturkeys

----

## Releases

| Nov 18, 1996 | TXT | Nov 18, 1996: Poultry Outlook detailsx                Nov 18, 1996: Poultry OutlookRelease datetime:Nov 18, 1996Close |
|--------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact person name:Grace Grossen

Contact office name:Economic Research Service

Contact email:grace.grossen@usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
*

Judge Motz did not participate in consideration of this case.

The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1193

BARBARA J. WINGATE; STEPHANIE D. WINGATE;

TRACY A. WINGATE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

WAL-MART STORE #630; ROBERT BROWNING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CA-02-2861-4-12; CA-02-4114-4-12; CA-02-4115-4-12)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.*

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara J. Wingate, Stephanie D. Wingate, Tracy A. Wingate,

Appellants Pro Se. Ronald Barton Diegel, Adam Joseph Neil, MURPHY

& GRANTLAND, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their

state tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See

Wingate v. Wal-Mart Store #630, Nos. CA-02-2861-4-12;

CA-02-4114-4-12; CA-02-4115-4-12 (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2003). We deny

Appellants’ “Motion for Stay of Action on Appeal and Change of

Venue.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00568

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.R. , D.J.O. and I.L.A.

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- PA

- 01589

Honorable Raul Perales , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating

appellants’ parental rights is AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assessed against appellants.

SIGNED November 29, 2023.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Philip D.Ranger, Chief Financial Officer of VantageMed Corporation, certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of VantageMed Corporation;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
|                                  | /s/ PHILIP D. RANGER     |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                             | Philip D. Ranger         |
|                             | Chief Financial  Officer |
| Dated:  March 31, 2006 |                     |

 

----
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

# **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(Subsection (a)and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

** **

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| May 1, 2006 |       /s/  Steven Roth |   |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|        | Name: Steven Roth                                    |
|        | Title: Chief Executive  Officer                      |
HOLDERS OF RECORD
 RESIDENTIAL FUNDING MORTGAGE SECURITITES I, INC.
 FORM 10-K
 PART II, ITEM 5 (B)
 EXHIBIT #4 PROPERTIES.

 SHELF            MORTGAGE POOL                     NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF RECORD

RAMP
                  2000-RS1                                                     7
                  2000-RS2                                                     8
                  2000-RS3                                                     7
                  2000-RZ1                                                     7
                  2001-RS1                                                     9
                  2001-RS2                                                    19
                  2001-RS3                                                    12
                  2002-RS2                                                    18
                  2002-RS3                                                    22
                  2002-RS4                                                    14
                  2002-RS5                                                    14
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08003**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### x 08003\08003_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 08003\08003_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 08003\08003_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08003\08003_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 08003\08003_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 08003\Certification Statement Plant ID_08003.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 08003\Supporting Documentation\08003_RRGP Aerial View.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08003\Supporting Documentation\08003_RRGP Average Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 08003\Supporting Documentation\08003_RRGP Max Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
/**
 * @file
 * JavaScript to autofocus first input.
 */

(function ($, Drupal) {

  'use strict';

  /**
   * Autofocus first input.
   *
   * @type {Drupal~behavior}
   *
   * @prop {Drupal~behaviorAttach} attach
   *   Attaches the behavior for the webform autofocusing.
   */
  Drupal.behaviors.webformAutofocus = {
    attach: function (context) {
      $(context).find('.js-webform-autofocus :input:visible:enabled:first')
        .trigger('focus');
    }
  };

})(jQuery, Drupal);
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.315 New River, South Fork. ( a ) The draw of the Davie Boulevard (SW. Twelfth Street) bridge, mile 0.9 at Fort Lauderdale shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need not open. Public vessels of the United States, tugs with tows, and vessels in distress shall be passed at any time.
( b ) The drawspan for the SR84 Drawbridge, mile 4.4 at Fort Lauderdale, must open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given. Public vessels of the United States and tugs with tows must be passed through the draw as soon as possible.
[USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70310, Dec. 4, 2006; 72 FR 7351, Feb. 15, 2007]
§ 870.56 Termination of exemption. ( a ) After notice and opportunity to be heard, the Administrator shall terminate any exemption of State-regulated garnishments when he finds that the laws of the State no longer satisfy the purpose of section 303(a) of the Act or the policy expressed in § 870.51(a). Also, after notice and opportunity to be heard, the Administrator may terminate any exemption if he finds that any of its terms or conditions have been violated.
( b ) General notice of the termination of every exemption of State-regulated garnishments shall be given by publication in the Federal Register.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J UA N CARLOS C ASTI LL O- LOPE Z, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N os . 12- 10192 12- 10193 D . C . N o s. 2 : 1 2 -cr-0 0 0 7 2 -F JM 2 : 0 7 -cr-0 1 4 0 9 -F JM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona F r e de r i c k J . M art one , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n th e s e c o n s o lid a te dap p e a ls , Ju an C ar lo s C a s tillo - L o p e z ap p e a ls h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n a n d2 4 - m o n th s e n te n c e f o rr e e n tryo f

ar e m o v e da lie n , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326; a nd the r e voc a t i on of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e a nd c ons e c ut i ve 15- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on. P ur s uantt o A nder s v . 

# FI LED JU N 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10192 & 12- 10193 2 Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , C a s t i l l o- L ope z ’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng tha tthe r e ar e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of reco rd . W e h av e p ro v i d edC ast i l l o -L o p ez th e o p p o rtu n i ty t o fi l e a p ro se supp l em ent albri ef

. N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef

has bee n f ile d . C as t i l l o-L op ez has w ai ved h i s r i gh tt o app ea l hi s c on vi ct i on and sent ence , and h i s r i gh tt o app ea l the re vo cat i on of supervi se d rel ea se and the se nt ence im p o s e dup o n r e v o c a tio n . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e r e c o r dp u r s u an t to P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U . S . 75, 80 ( 1988) , di s c l os e s no a r guabl e i s s ue a s t o the v a lid ityo f

th e w a iv e r . Se e U

ni te d States v . W

at s on , 58 2 F . 3d 97 4, 98 6-88 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) .C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit (23)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-33153, 33-53155, 33-53897, 33-55317, 33-58787, 333-36909, 333-49195, 333-36846, 333-75848, 333-100234, 333-105161, 333-105162, 333-121604,
333-132977, and 333-137016 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-33814 and 333-116138 on Form S-3 and No. 333-120576 on Form S-4 of our reports dated February 23, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.

LOGO



|                    
|--------------------
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin
|February 23, 2007
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000781

05-DEC-2019

07:51 AM
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 462 

Designating the first week of April 2008 as ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness 

Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2008 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. TESTER, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the first week of April 2008 as ‘‘National 

Asbestos Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas dangerous asbestos fibers are invisible and cannot 

be smelled or tasted; 

Whereas the inhalation of airborne asbestos fibers can cause 

significant damage; 

Whereas these fibers can cause mesothelioma, asbestosis, and 

other health problems; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases can take 10 to 50 years to 

present themselves; 

Whereas the expected survival time for those diagnosed with 

mesothelioma is between 6 and 24 months; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 462 IS 

Whereas generally little is known about late stage treatment 

and there is no cure for asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas early detection of asbestos-related diseases may give 

some patients increased treatment options and might improve their prognosis; 

Whereas the United States has substantially reduced its consumption of asbestos yet continues to consume almost 

2,000 metric tons of the fibrous mineral for use in certain products throughout the Nation; 

Whereas asbestos-related diseases have killed thousands of 

people in the United States; 

Whereas asbestos exposures continue and safety and prevention will reduce and has reduced significantly asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases; 

Whereas asbestos has been a cause of occupational cancer; 

Whereas thousands of workers in the United States face significant asbestos exposure; 

Whereas thousands of people in the United States die from 

asbestos-related diseases every year; 

Whereas a significant percentage of all asbestos-related disease victims were exposed to asbestos on naval ships and 

in shipyards; 

Whereas asbestos was used in the construction of a significant number of office buildings and public facilities built 

before 1975; 

Whereas people in the small community of Libby, Montana 

have asbestos-related diseases at a significantly higher 

rate than the national average and suffer from mesothelioma at a significantly higher rate than the national average; and 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 462 IS 

Whereas the establishment of a ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Week’’ would raise public awareness about the prevalence of asbestos-related diseases and the dangers of asbestos exposure: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the first week of April 2008 as 

3 ‘‘National Asbestos Awareness Week’’; 

4 (2) urges the Surgeon General, as a public 

5 health issue, to warn and educate people that asbes6 tos exposure may be hazardous to their health; and 

7 (3) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

8 Senate to transmit a copy of this resolution to the 

9 Surgeon General. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
#### § 785.12 Work performed away from the premises or job site.

The rule is also applicable to work performed away from the premises or the job site, or even at home. If the employer knows or has reason to believe that the work is being performed, he must count the time as hours worked.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7618

NORMAN CUNYON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; CHARLES E.

HILL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-97-654-2)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Cunyon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Norman Cunyon, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). This petition was properly construed as

arising under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 by the district court. See

Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 497 (1973) (challenge of the

withdrawal of good time credits falls squarely within the scope of

28 U.S.C. § 2254). Cunyon previously filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition in 1990 which was denied. See Cunyon v. Allsbrook, No. C90-23-G (M.D.N.C. May 31, 1991). Thus, the present petition is

successive, relates to facts known at the time of the prior petition, and Cunyon failed to receive authorization from the Court to

file this successive petition, nor would it be one authorized under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Moreover, Cunyon has

failed to establish either prong of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on this basis. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.915 Ashley River. ( a ) The draws of the US17 Highway Bridges (Ashley River Bridges), mile 2.4 and 2.5 at Charleston, SC shall open on signal; except that, from 4 p.m. to 9 a.m. daily, the draws shall open only if at least 12 hours notice is given. The draws of either bridge shall open as soon as possible for the passage of vessels in an emergency involving danger to life or property.
( b ) The draw of the Seaboard System Railroad bridge, mile 12.0 near Drayton Hall, shall open on signal from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. From 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least three hours notice is given.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by USCG-2016-0776, 82 FR 59519, Dec. 15, 2017]