alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER





As independent petroleum engineers, we
hereby consent to the use of our name included herein or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K by McMoRan Exploration Co. and to the reference to
our estimates of reserves and present value of future net reserves as of
December 31, 2008, into McMoRan Exploration Co.’s previously filed Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-144496 and 333-121779) and on Forms
S-8 (File Nos. 333-57484, 333-67485, 333-87380, 333-90170, 333-105533,
333-115335,  333-124740 and 333-153002).





RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





Houston,
Texas


February
26, 2009
#### Sweeny *vs*Lowe.

Error to the Washington Circuit.

Chancery.

*Case*65.

Justices of the Peace have jurisdiction to render judgments in cases within their jurisdiction, though the interest added may exceed ISO. —And under the statutes of 1838, 1839, and 1840, to enforce by equilable process, especially that of attachment, the collection of those debts over which they have jurisdiction at law.

Can the Circuit Court entertain *315jurisdiction of a ^case comment cing under the equitable junsdiction of a'JusPeace

*314
      *Justices of the Peace. Jurisdiction.*

*April*8.

Judge Makshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Justice of the Peace had jurisdiction to render the judgment against Chilton Lowe for $49 50, with interest and costs'; and although the aggregate amount of debt, interest, and costs exceeded $50, we are of opinion that the acts of 1838, 1839, and 1840, regulating the equitable jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace, (3 *Stat. Law,*375-6-7-8,) when construed together as they should be, evince the intention of the Legislature to authorize Justices of the Peace to enforce, by equitable process, and especially by process of attachment orguarnishment, those debts over which they have jurisdiction at law. The execution on the judgment against Chilton Lowe having been returned “no property,” the Justice had authority to issue the warrant against Samuel Lowe as the debtor of Chilton Lówe, and to render the judgment against Samuel Lowe by default.

This bill, filed by Samuel Lowe, seeks to injoin *the*judgment thus rendered against him, on the ground that Chilton Lowe did not owe Sweeney, and that he himself owed nothing to Chilton Lowe, and he alledges various causes for not having attended to the case before the Justice in the first instance, and for not having moved for a new trial or taken an appeal, &c.

But waiving all question as to his right to come into the Circuit Court by original bill in equity, in a case commencing under the equitable jurisdiction of a Justice *315of the Peace, and also all enquiry as to the sufficiency of the causes alledged in excuse of his failure to pursue the usual steps for the assertion of his rights, we are of opinion that he has failed to establish the main grounds on which he claims the aid of the Chancellor. He has not shownlhat either of the judgments is unjust, but our deduction from the entire evidence is, that both of them are just.

*Harlan fy Craddock and Shuck*for plaintiff.

Wherefore, the decree perpetuating the injunction is reversed, and the cause is remanded with' directions to dismiss the bill.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00246-CV

Antonio Arriaga and Inez Rosales

v.

Obdulia Martinez Arriaga

On Appeal from the

197th District Court of Willacy County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2015-CV-0316-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 21, 2021
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <PAGE>
  
  <ARTICLE>     UT
  <LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
             EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF
             INCOME, RETAINED EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS OF MASSACHUSETTS
             ELECTRIC COMPANY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
             REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
  </LEGEND>
  <SUBSIDIARY>
     <NUMBER>   2
     <CIK> 0000063073
     <NAME>     MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY
  <MULTIPLIER>  1,000
         
  <S>                                                                 <C>
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998              
  <PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1998
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
  <BOOK-VALUE>                        PER-BOOK
  <TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          1,143,169
  <OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                0
  <TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>               270,158
  <TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>              41,235                 <F1>
  <OTHER-ASSETS>                             0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,454,562
  <COMMON>                                59,953
  <CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            239,440
  <RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  208,537
  <TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>       508,203                 <F3>
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
  <PREFERRED>                           10,674
  <LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 353,329
  <SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                    80,725
  <LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
  <COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>             0
  <LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         15,000
  <PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  0
  <CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                0
  <LEASES-CURRENT>                           0
  <OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>       486,631
  <TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      1,454,562
  <GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          1,490,417
  <INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  36,319
  <OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         1,366,454
  <TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         1,402,773
  <OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               87,644
  <OTHER-INCOME-NET>                    (3,510)
  <INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        84,134
  <TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              33,748
  <NET-INCOME>                          50,386
  <PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              873
  <EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         49,513
  <COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              41,967
  <TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>             27,073
  <CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                73,251
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0                 <F2>
  <EPS-DILUTED>                              0                 <F2>
  <FN>
  <F1>                              Total deferred charges includes other assets.
  <F2>                              Per share data is not relevant because the Company's common stock
                                      is wholly-owned by New England Electric System.
  <F3>                              Total common stockholders equity includes the unrealized gain on
  securities.
  </FN>
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 4.9 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED MICHAEL KORS (USA), INC. 
 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Michael Kors (USA), Inc., a corporation
organized under the laws of Delaware (the “Company”), originally adopted the Michael Kors (USA), Inc. Stock Option Plan on April 15, 2008, which Plan was amended and restated effective as of July 11, 2011 (as amended from
time to time, the “Plan”). 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) or
the Option Committee may, at any time, amend the Plan provided that such amendment does not adversely affect the rights of the Grantees with respect to Options previously granted under the Plan. 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is advantageous to the Grantees to amend the Plan to permit Options to be transferred to
certain Permitted Assignees (as defined below). 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 2 of the Plan shall be amended by relettering Sections 2(y) through 2(jj) as Sections 2(z) through 2(kk), and adding the
following definition as new Section 2(y): 
 “(y) Permitted Assignee” shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 11(d)(ii).” 
 2. Section 11(d) of the Plan shall be amended by renumbering it as Section 11(d)(i)
and adding the following proviso at the beginning thereof: 
 “(i) Except as provided in Section 11(d)(ii) below,”

 3. Section 11(d) of the Plan shall be further amended by adding a new subsection (ii) at the end thereof as
follows: 
 “(ii) To the extent and under such terms and conditions as determined by the Option Committee, a Grantee may
assign or transfer an Option without consideration (each transferee thereof, a “Permitted Assignee”) (i) to the Grantee’s spouse, children or grandchildren (including any adopted and step children or grandchildren),
parents, grandparents or siblings, (ii) to a trust for the benefit of one or more of the Grantee or the persons referred to in clause (i), (iii) to a partnership, limited liability company or corporation in which the Grantee or the persons
referred to in clause (i) are the only partners, members or shareholders or (iv) for charitable donations; provided that such Permitted Assignee shall be bound by and subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Grant
Certificate relating to the transferred Option and shall execute an agreement satisfactory to the Company evidencing such obligations; and provided further that such Grantee shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Company
shall cooperate with any Permitted Assignee and the transfer agent of Michael Kors Holdings Limited in effectuating any transfer permitted under this Section.” 







 EXECUTION VERSION 

Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 
 This Amendment has been
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company as of May 3, 2012.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-00-024] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

June 9, 2000 at 2:30 p.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Agenda for future meeting: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-847 and 850 (Final) (Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe and Tube from Japan and South Africa)—briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on June 16, 2000.). 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. 

Issued: May 25, 2000.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-13804 Filed 5-30-00; 10:18 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
**Exhibit12.1**

 

**SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST**

**Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

**(dollars in thousands)**

 
| ** **                          | ** ** | **Nine months Ended  September 30,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2004**                             | ** ** | **2003**                    | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** | **1999** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                           |       |                                 |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                          |       | $                                    | 40,229     |                        | $          | 32,309 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   | $ | 58,437 |   | $ | 14,834 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |       | 30,910                               |       | 27,659                      |       | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   | 15,366 |   | 18,768 |   |
| Adjusted  earnings                  |       | $                                    | 71,139     |                        | $          | 59,968 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   | $ | 73,803 |   | $ | 33,602 |   |
|                                |       |                                 |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                      |       |                                 |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |       | $                                    | 30,910     |                        | $          | 27,659 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   | $ | 15,366 |   | $ | 18,768 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges |       | 2.3                                  | x          | 2.2                         | x          | 2.2 | x | 2.7 | x | 3.3 | x | 4.8 | x | 1.8 | x |

 

----
Program Instructions

AOA-PI-99-03

TO : STATES ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1965, AS 

AMENDED

SUBJECT : Reallotment Procedure for 1999 Title III Formula Grant Funds

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES : Section 304(b) of the Older Americans Act of 1965, As 

Amended

The purpose of this program instruction is to provide guidance for state agencies to notify the 

Administration on Aging (AoA) of: 1) the amount, if any, of fiscal year (FY) 1999 Title III funds which 

states will not use by September 30, 1999, and will release for reallotment; and 2) the request for 

additional Title III funds which could be obligated by the state agencies in FY 1999 and FY 2000. As 

you know, Title III funds, which are made available through reallotment, are available for obligation 

by state agencies during the following fiscal year in which funds were appropriated.

Release of Funds

State agencies not intending to use the full amount of their Title III allotments should submit a 

statement signed by the authorized state agency official releasing Title III funds for reallotment. This 

statement must identify from which allotment the funds are being released. If a state releases funds 

for reallotment, a revised grant award will be issued reflecting the decrease.

Request for Funds

If additional funds can be utilized, state agencies should submit a brief statement requesting 

additional funds signed by the appropriate state agency official.

DUE DATE: 

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS regional offices.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Report of Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:April
                16, 2007
            By:
            */s/
                Luiz Valdetaro*Name:Luiz
                Valdetaro
                Title:Principal
                  Accounting Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Company Systems, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(Subsection (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

** **
| July 31, 2006 |      /s/  Steven Roth |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------|
|          | Name: Steven Roth                              |
|          | Title: Chief Executive  Officer                |

 

----
#### § 784.19 Commerce activities of enterprise in which employee is employed.

Under amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act employees not covered by reason of their personal engagement in interstate commerce activities, as explained in § 784.18, are nevertheless brought within the coverage of the Act if they are employed in an enterprise which is defined in section 3(s) of the Act as an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce. Such employees, if not exempt from minimum wages and overtime pay under section 13(a)(5) or exempt from overtime pay under section 13(b)(4), will have to be paid in accordance with the monetary standards of the Act unless expressly exempt under some other provision. This would generally be true of employees employed in enterprises and by establishments engaged in the procurement, processing, marketing, or distribution of seafood and other aquatic products, where the enterprise has an annual gross sales volume of not less than $250,000. Enterprise coverage is more fully discussed in part 776 of this chapter, dealing with general coverage.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 14, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00331

- CV

IN RE Joe Wayne SUTHERLAND , Rodney Matocha and Tammye Duckworth as Independ ent

Co

- Executors of the Estate of Hilbur A. Mason and as Independent Co

- Administrators with Will

Annexed of the Estate of Beatrice J. Mason,

From the 218th Judicial District Court

, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20

- 01

- 00010

- CVK

Honorable R ussell Wilson , Judge Presiding

Original Mandamus Proceeding



### O R D E R

Sitting : Rebeca C . Marti nez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On June 2

, 2022

, relator s filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion

for stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus

. On June 6, 2022, real party

in interest filed a response to relators’ emergency motion for stay. After considering relato rs’

petition, emergency motion for stay, and real party in interest’s response to relators’ emergency

motion

, t his court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires

further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real part ies in interest

may file a response to the petition in this court on or before June 2 9

, 2022

. Any such response

must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

We GRANT the emergency motion for stay relief as follows:

1. All proceedings in the Karnes County District Court are STAYED

pending further orders of this court.

2. The trial court’s “Order Granting Injunction and Writ of Prohibition”

signed on February 28, 2022, is STAYED pending further orders of this court.It is so ORDERED on June 14, 2022

.

P ER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class         Interest        Principal          Losses            Balance
<S>             <C>                <C>              <C>               <C>
A1           809741.25       1017106.79                0       142936893.21
APO                  0         10574.01                0         2786276.52
AR              473.08              100                0                  0
B1               11430          6554.83                0         2025445.17
B2             2964.38             1700                0             525300
B3             2964.38             1700                0             525300
B4             1693.13           970.97                0          300029.03
B5              843.75           483.87                0          149516.13
B6             1274.18           730.71                0          225790.75


</TABLE>
OIL CROPS OUTLOOK OCS-0599 (PDF)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This report is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831.  The report was released in
ASCII format on May 13, 1999.

Electronic release only; no printed copies are available

Please note that this publication is in .PDF format and 22.4 KB in size.
Acrobat Reader 3.0 or later is required to view and print this document.
The Adobe Acrobat .PDF format is used to preserve all the layout and
content used in the original publication. To download and get help using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, please go to:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

For More Information on ERS Publications and Data
*************************************************
Visit the ERS web site at:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov

Other reports are available from the Products and Services
area on the ERS web site from:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/periodic.htm

For sales information on ERS publications, go to:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/sales.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
END_OF_FILE