alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.62
 ALEXANDERS, INC. OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 Schedule A Company Schedule A Employee
 RECITALS
 Plan Common Shares
 Schedule A Schedule A
  AGREEMENT
 Grant of Restricted Stock Schedule A Restricted Stock
 Vesting Period Vesting
Period Schedule A Schedule A
 provided




---



##### 



Forfeiture of Restricted Stock Change in Control
 Incumbent Directors Board provided provided however
 Exchange Act Company
Voting Securities provided however provided
 2




---



##### 



Vornado Interstate Interstate Partners Vornado or Interstate Holders
 Business Transaction Surviving Corporation Non-Qualifying Transaction
  Certificates
 3




---



##### 



Tax Withholding Withholding Amount
 Certain Adjustments
 No Right to Employment
 Notice
 Governing Law
 Successors and Assigns
 Severability
 4




---



##### 



Headings
 Counterparts
 Miscellaneous
 CONFLICT WITH EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 [signature page follows]
 5




---



##### 



ALEXANDERS, INC.By:Name:Title:[Employees Name]
 6




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A TO RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
  Date of Restricted Stock Agreement:Name of Employee:Number of Common Shares Subject to Grant:Date of Grant:Date on Which Restricted Stock is Fully Vested:Vesting Period:Annual Vesting AmountInsert the number of Restricted Shares that vest each year or other
applicable vesting schedule.Annual Vesting Date(or if such date is not
a business day, on the next succeeding business day):Insert the calendar date of each year on which Restricted Shares will vest
or other appropriate vesting schedule.
 
 
 7
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Patrick Cox v. Cara Cox

Appellate case number: 01-15-00063-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-21966

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

On September 20, 2016, this Court withdrew its opinion and judgment and abated the 

appeal because appellant petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy 

Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, under case number 16-32363. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, 

this Court has learned that the bankruptcy case closed on January 9, 2019.

Unless any party to the appeal files a motion demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal 

by May 10, 2019, this appeal will be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Justice Richard Hightower_______________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __April 30, 2019____
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,848                  10,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,431                  39,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,870                   3,412
<INVENTORY>                                     50,332                  46,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,695                  95,393
<PP&E>                                          58,128                  48,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,346                  10,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,059                 163,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,282                  49,666
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           883                     831
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,759                  20,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,059                 163,152
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               249,202                 195,313
<CGS>                                          167,917                 142,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,125                 177,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,992                   7,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,457                  11,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,375                   4,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,082                   6,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,082                   6,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81                    0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52                    0.74
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNV956000.L142000000.XH0000.241E0; 11-08807; MO# 4500022720; TAS: 14X1109]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Nevada State Office, Information Access Center (IAC) will implement new hours of operation, weekdays, excluding Federal holidays, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The BLM Nevada State Office will close P.O. Box 12000 in Reno, Nevada. All postal service mail to the BLM Nevada State Office should be addressed to 1340 Financial Blvd., Reno, NV 89502.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The new hours of operation and the P.O. Box closure will be effective October 1, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dilene A. Smith, Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial Blvd, Reno, NV 89502, telephone: (775) 861-6529, e-mail:                         *dasmith@blm.gov.*                         Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal hours.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The change in hours extends the hours the public may conduct business with the Information Access Center. The closure of the P.O. Box will result in all postal service mail to be delivered to the physical location of the Nevada State Office.

Robert M. Scruggs,

Deputy State Director, Support Services.

[FR Doc. 2011-20928 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
Cite as 2013 Ark. 386

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. 

I N R E S U P R E M E C O U R T

COMMITTEE ON MODEL JURY

INSTRUCTIONS–CIVIL

Opinion Delivered October 3, 2013

PER CURIAM

The court expresses its gratitude to Tim Cullen, Esq., of Little Rock, whose term has

expired, for his valuable service to the Supreme Court Committee on Model Jury

Instructions–Civil.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WILLIAM D. DOWNES, JR., § § No. 358, 2014 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for Sussex County § STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 9408020702 Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: September 9, 2014 Decided: September 10, 2014 O R D E R This 10 th day of September 2014, it appears to the Court tha t, on August 27, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice to the a ppellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his fai lure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brie f and appendix and for his failure to pay the required filing fee. The appell ant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-da y period. Consequently, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Randy J. Holland Justice
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51878-51879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9538]
RIN 1545-BK14


Modifications of Certain Derivative Contracts; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document describes correcting amendments to final and 
temporary regulations (TD 9538) that address when a transfer or 
assignment of certain derivative contracts does not result in an 
exchange to the nonassigning counterparty for purposes.
    These regulations were published in the Federal Register on Friday, 
July 22, 2011.

DATES: This correction is effective on August 19, 2011, and is 
applicable beginning July 22, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea M. Hoffenson, (202) 622-3920 
(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The final and temporary regulations that are the subject of this 
correction are under section 1001 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published July 22, 2011 (76 FR 43892), the final and temporary 
regulations (TD 9538) contain errors that may prove to be misleading 
and are in need of clarification.

[[Page 51879]]

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.1001-4T is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), 
(b)(1) and (b)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.1001-4T  Modifications of certain derivative contracts 
(temporary).

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (1) Both the party transferring or assigning its rights and 
obligations under the derivative contract and the party to which the 
rights and obligations are transferred or assigned are either a dealer 
or a clearinghouse;
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Dealer. For purposes of this section, a dealer is a taxpayer 
who meets the definition of a dealer in securities in section 475(c)(1) 
or is a dealer in commodities derivative contracts.
* * * * *
    (3) Derivative contract. For purposes of this section, a derivative 
contract is a contract described in--
    (i) Section 475(c)(2)(D), 475(c)(2)(E), or 475(c)(2)(F) without 
regard to the last sentence of section 475(c)(2) referencing section 
1256;
    (ii) Section 475(e)(2)(B), 475(e)(2)(C), or 475(e)(2)(D); or
    (iii) Section 1.446-3(c)(1).
* * * * *

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2011-21180 Filed 8-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald F. Sullivan certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sibling Entertainment Group Holdings, Inc., (the “Company ”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report ”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 20, 2012

By: /s/ Gerald F. Sullivan   
Name: Gerald F. Sullivan 
Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive 
Officer and Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 11 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LAVERN BERRYHILL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

EDWARD EVANS,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 96-6264

(D.C. No. CIV-95-700-T)

(Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge; PORFILIO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing

the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the

issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Essentially for the

reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge contained in the record, the

certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2); Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir. 1996). 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
### NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 105

- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ PABLO SANCHEZ AND CHURCH OF GOD THE APOSTOLIC FAITH LATIN CONFERENCE, INC. , A ppellants ,

v. IGLESIA CRISTIANA CRISTO VIVE, INC. , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant s filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 139th District C ourt of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C

- 237

- 03

- C

. On April 28, 2011, th is appeal
was abated and the parties were ordered to mediation. This cause is now before the
Court on a ppellant s ’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the trial2

court has granted a new trial. Appellant s request that this Court dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants ’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellants = motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants = request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 26th day of May , 20 11

.
### Symposium proceedings; a national program for the assessment and development of the mineral resources of the United States Exclusive Economic Zone; November 15, 16, 17, 1983

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir929

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

At December 31, 2003, the Company had five
directly wholly owned subsidiaries:



| |                                                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Morton Metalcraft Co., an Illinois corporation                                  
| | Morton Metalcraft Co., of North Carolina, a North
    Carolina corporation      
| | B & W Metal Fabricators, Inc., a
    North Carolina corporation                 
| | Mid-Central Plastics, Inc., an Iowa
    corporation (operations sold June, 2003)
| | Morton Metalcraft Co. of South Carolina, a South
    Carolina corporation       

At December 31, 2003, the Company owned 49%
of Morton Holdings, LLC. Morton Holdings, LLC owned 100% of
Morton Custom Plastics, LLC. Morton Custom Plastics, LLC held
the assets acquired in 1999 from Worthington Custom
Plastics, Inc. Quilvest Custom Plastics, Inc., an
affiliate of shareholders of Morton Industrial Group, Inc.
owned 51% of Morton Holdings, LLC. Morton Industrial
Group, Inc., acted as the manager of Morton Holdings, LLC
and was allocated 100% of each item of Morton Holdings,
LLCs income, gains, losses, deductions and credits.
Quilvest Custom Plastics, Inc. granted Morton Industrial
Group, Inc., an irrevocable option to purchase its interest
in Morton Holdings, LLC at any time for the sum of One Thousand
Dollars.

On November 1, 2002, Morton Holdings, LLC
and Morton Custom Plastics, LLC filed as debtor-in-possession
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
Before filing, Morton Custom Plastics, LLC had negotiated the
terms of an agreement for sale of substantially all of its
assets to Wilbert, Inc., pursuant to an Asset Purchase
Agreement. Under the agreement, Wilbert, Inc. also assumed
the liabilities of Morton Custom Plastics, LLC under certain of
their contracts and leases. This sales transaction was completed
on December 24, 2002.
§ 825.800 Special rules for airline flight crew employees, general. ( a ) Certain special rules apply only to airline flight crew employees as defined in § 825.102. These special rules affect the hours of service requirement for determining the eligibility of airline flight crew employees, the calculation of leave for those employees, and the recordkeeping requirements for employers of those employees, and are issued pursuant to the Airline Flight Crew Technical Corrections Act (AFCTCA), Public Law 111-119.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, FMLA leave for airline flight crew employees is subject to the requirements of the FMLA as set forth in Part 825, Subparts A through E, and G.
Docket Number: FAA-2015-1985
# AGENCY:

 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

 Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

 The EPA has authorized the following contractor and subcontractors for access to information that has been, or will be, submitted to EPA under sections 108-112, 114, 129 and 183 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended: Research Triangle Institute, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; Pechan-Avanti Group, 5537-C Hempstead Way, Springfield, Virginia 22151; Stratus Consulting, Inc., Suite 201, 1881 Ninth Street, Boulder, Colorado 80302; Mathtech, Inc., Suite 111, 202 Carnegie Center, Princeton, New Jersey 08540; The Kevric Company, Inc., Suite 610, 8401 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 under contract number 68-D-99-024. 

Some of the information may be claimed to be confidential business information (CBI) by the submitter. 

# DATES:

 Access to confidential data submitted to EPA under the CAA will occur no sooner than 10 days after issuance of this notice. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Melva Toomer, Document Control Officer, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (MD-11), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, (919) 541-0880. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The EPA is issuing this notice to inform all submitters of information under sections 108-112, 114, 129 and 183 of the CAA that EPA may provide the above mentioned contractor and subcontractors access to these materials on a need-to-know basis. This contractor and subcontractors will provide technical support to the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) in the analyses of cost and benefits of actual or potential EPA action taken under the CAA. 

In accordance with 40 CFR, part 2. subparts B and other EPA regulations and policies, EPA has determined that this contractor and subcontractors require access to CBI, submitted to EPA under sections 108-112, 114, 129 and 183 of the CAA, in order to perform work satisfactorily under the above noted contract. The contractor and subcontractor personnel will be given access to information submitted under the above mentioned section of the CAA. Some of the information may be claimed or determined to be CBI. The contractor and subcontractor personnel will be required to sign nondisclosure agreements and will be briefed on appropriate security procedures before they are permitted access to CAA CBI. All access to CAA CBI will take place at the prime contractor's facility. This prime contractor has appropriate procedures and facilities in place to safeguard the CAA CBI to which the contractor has access. 

Clearance for access to CAA CBI is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2004 under contract 68-D-99-024. 

Dated: January 11, 2000. 

Robert Brenner, 

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 00-1363 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLIING CODE 6560-50-P