alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2225-000]


Duke Energy St. Lucie, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 30, 2000.
    Duke Energy St. Lucie, LLC (Duke Energy St. Lucie) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Duke Energy St. Lucie will engage in 
wholesale electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Duke 
Energy St. Lucie also requested waiver of various Commission 
regulations. In particular, Duke Energy St. Lucie requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Duke Energy St. 
Lucie.
    On May 25, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Duke Energy St. Lucie should file a 
motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period Duke Energy St. 
Lucie is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Duke Energy St. Lucie's issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 26, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13916 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ACL/AoD Protection and Advocacy (PADD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2019 Final Allocation

9/4/2019

State/Territory

AIDD Protection 

and Advocacy 

(PADD)

Alabama $504,146

Alaska $404,556

Arizona $732,031

Arkansas $404,556

California $3,998,921

Colorado $506,685

Connecticut $407,815

Delaware $404,556

District of Columbia $404,556

Florida $2,120,721

Georgia $1,056,977

Hawaii $404,556

Idaho $404,556

Illinois $1,273,675

Indiana $641,102

Iowa $404,556

Kansas $404,556

Kentucky $462,995

Louisiana $546,923

Maine $404,556

Maryland $587,033

Massachusetts $669,808

Michigan $1,021,390

Minnesota $515,593

Mississippi $410,751

Missouri $583,148

Montana $404,556

Nebraska $404,556

Nevada $404,556

New Hampshire $404,556

New Jersey $862,406

New Mexico $404,556

New York $2,053,869

North Carolina $1,069,517

North Dakota $404,556

Ohio $1,210,263

Oklahoma $404,556

Oregon $415,057

Pennsylvania $1,273,771

Rhode Island $404,556

South Carolina $512,478

South Dakota $404,556

Tennessee $647,601

Texas $2,877,405

Utah $404,556

Vermont $404,556

Virginia $784,548

Washington $743,177

West Virginia $404,556

Wisconsin $533,911

Wyoming $404,556

American Samoa $216,435

Guam $216,435

Northern Mariana Islands $216,435

Puerto Rico $821,254

Virgin Islands $216,435

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $216,435

TOTAL $39,827,378
### Geology and ground-water features of Shasta Valley, Siskiyou County, California

By: Seymour Mack

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1484

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 104.140 Alternative Security Programs. A vessel owner or operator may use an Alternative Security Program as approved under § 101.120 of this subchapter if: ( a ) The Alternative Security Program is appropriate to that class of vessel;
( b ) The vessel is not subject to the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974; and
( c ) The Alternative Security Program is implemented in its entirety.
[USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39302, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60513, Oct. 22, 2003]
#### § 115.01 Purpose.

This part states the requirements for applying for a permit to construct or modify bridges crossing the navigable waters of the United States. It also sets forth the procedures by which the application is processed by the Coast Guard.

[CGD 82-006, 47 FR 36641, Aug. 23, 1982, as amended by USCG-2012-0306, 77 FR 37314, June 21, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         230,418
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,968,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,936,221
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         231,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,060,985
<ALLOWANCE>                                     35,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,980,020
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,788,669
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             38,705
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,718,858
<OTHER-SE>                                    (566,212)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              15,980,020
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 39,259
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               43,405
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               131,435
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               214,099
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,261
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,710
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          159,389
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   35,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                469,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (344,221)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (344,221)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               35,500
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            35,500
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         35,500


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1058 Snake River. ( a ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge across the Snake River at mile 1.5 between Pasco and Burbank is automated and is normally maintained in the fully open to navigation position.
( b ) *Lights.* All lights required for automated operation shall be visible for a distance of at least 2 miles and shall be displayed at all times, day and night. ( 1 ) When the draw is fully open, a steady green light shall be displayed at the center of the drawspan on both upstream and downstream sides.
( 2 ) When the draw is not fully open, a steady red light shall be displayed at the center of the drawspan on both upstream and downstream sides.
( 3 ) When the draw is about to close, flashing yellow lights in the form of a down-pointing arrow shall be displayed at the center of the drawspan on both upstream and downstream sides.
( 4 ) A similar set of red, green, and yellow lights shall be displayed on a remote lighting panel located near the north end, upstream side, of the Washington State highway bridge at mile 2.2. These lights shall be synchronized with the lights on the railroad bridge and shall be visible to vessels traveling downstream throughout the passage of the channel adjacent to Strawberry Island.
( c ) *Operation.* When a train approaches the bridge, the yellow lights shall start flashing. After an eight-minute delay, the green lights shall change to red, the drawspan shall lower and lock, and the yellow lights shall be extinguished. Red lights shall continue to be displayed until the train has crossed and the drawspan is again in the fully open position. At that time, the red lights shall change green.
( d ) Vessels equipped with radiotelephones may contact Burlington Northern Santa Fe to obtain information on the status of the bridge. Bridge status information also may be obtained by calling the commercial telephone number posted at the drawspan of the bridge.
[CGD13 84-05, 49 FR 43956, Nov. 1, 1984]
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 8.4 Contents of petition. ( a ) A petition for review of a wage determination shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing and signed by the petitioner or his/her counsel (or other authorized representative);
( 2 ) Be addressed to the Administrative Review Board;
( 3 ) Identify clearly the wage determination, location where the contract will be performed, if known, and the agency concerned;
( 4 ) State that the petitioner has requested reconsideration of the wage determination in question pursuant to 29 CFR 4.55 and describe briefly the action taken in response to the request;
( 5 ) Contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for review;
( 6 ) Be accompanied by supporting data, views, or arguments; and
( 7 ) Contain a statement that all data or other evidence submitted have previously been submitted to the Administrator.
( b ) A petition shall indicate whether or not the petitioner consents to the disposition of the questions involved by a single member of the Board.
### Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States through September, 1950; part 13. Snake River basin

By: J. V. B. Wells

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1317

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Michael H. Vartanian, Appellant, v Research Foundation of State University of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 5, 1996;

decided October 17, 1996

Motion, pursuant to CPLR 5520 (a), for an extension of time *1054in which to file in the court of original instance the timely served notice of appeal granted. On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
----

| ●   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ●   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:  November      6, 2009 | /s/      Russell K. GirlingRussell      K. GirlingChairman,      Chief Executive Officer and DirectorTC      PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner ofTC      PipeLines, LP (Principal Executive Officer) |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### § 794.131 “Customer * * * engaged in bulk distribution”.

A sale to a customer of an enterprise engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products will be considered to come within the 25 percent limitation for purposes of the exemption under section 7(b)(3) if it is made to a “customer who is engaged in the bulk distribution of such products for resale”. The identity of such customers is generally well known in the trade. For example, this would generally include other petroleum jobbers, brokers, wholesalers, and any others who engaged in the bulk distribution of petroleum products for resale. Thus a sale to a petroleum jobber who is engaged in selling petroleum products to gasoline stations would clearly be a sale to a customer described in section 7(b)(3). The essential tests are: first, that the customer must be one who is engaged in the distribution of “such products”, which means petroleum products; second, that he must engage in “the bulk distribution” of such products; and finally, that he must be engaged in such distribution “for resale”. These three requirements are discussed in §§ 794.132 through 794.134.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Faces East Entertainment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Smolanoff, Ph.D, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Michael Smolanoff                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael Smolanoff, Ph.D.                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and President                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | June 20, 2006                                                                                                                                                                                             |
Devany, Dennis (OST) bt)T-QST'ZQ06- ^l-'f S 

From: Yamamoto, Alan (Inouye) [Alan_Yamamoto@inouye.senate.gov] 

Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:36 PM 

To: Kim, David (OST) 

Cc: Devany, Dennis (OST); Cummisky, Margaret (Appropriations); Sullivan, Gael (Commerce); 

Blanco, Marie (Inouye); Haia, Coti-Lynne (Inouye) 

Subject: Pacific Wings/EAS 

Attachmente: Iup10-eas 120610 DOT-OST-2000-6773-0060[1].pdf 

David: 

We understand Pacific Wings submitted a request to US DOT to claim EAS subsidy at Kalaupapa, Hav^^ail. (see 

attachment) 

In October 2010, Senator Inouye visited Kalaupapa. During the visit, residents expressed their dissatisfaction with the 

current air carrier. Senator Inouye continues to be very concerned about the community's air service and v\/ants to ensure 

Kalaupapa receives air service that meets the needs of the community. 

May I ask if our office can receive information on the process and timeline for the consideration of the Pacific Wings 

request. 

Thank you. 

Alan T. Yamamoto 

Senior Legislstive Assistant 

OfFice of Senator Daniel K. Inouye 

300 Ala Moana Boulevard Room 7-212, Honolulu, HI 96850 

606.541.2542 main | 808.541.2021 direct [ 606.541.2549 fax 

http7/inouve.5enate.qov I Sign up for Senator Inouye's newsletter -.'j: • .--."- J 

:> 

ooo
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 173 

Designating August 11, 2007, as ‘‘National Marina Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Ms. STABENOW submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

JUNE 20, 2007 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating August 11, 2007, as ‘‘National Marina Day’’. 

Whereas the citizens of the United States highly value recreation time and their ability to access 1 of the greatest 

natural resources of the United States, its waterways; 

Whereas, in 1928, the word ‘‘marina’’ was used for the first 

time by the National Association of Engine and Boat 

Manufacturers to define a recreational boating facility; 

Whereas the United States is home to over 12,000 recreational boating facilities that contribute substantially to 

their local communities by providing safe, reliable gateways to boating for members of their communities and 

welcomed guests; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

SRES 173 ATS 

Whereas marinas of the United States also serve as stewards 

of the environment, actively seeking to protect their surrounding waterways not only for the enjoyment of the 

current generation, but for generations to come; and 

Whereas marinas of the United States also provide their communities and visitors a place where friends and families, 

united by a passion for the water, can come together for 

recreation, rest, and relaxation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates the marinas of the United 

3 States for providing environmentally friendly gate4 ways to boating for the citizens of, and the visitors 

5 to the United States; and 

6 (2) designates August 11, 2007, as the sixth 

7 annual ‘‘National Marina Day’’ in order— 

8 (A) to honor the marinas of the United 

9 States for their many contributions to their 

10 local communities; and 

11 (B) to make citizens, policy makers, elect12 ed officials, and employees more aware of the 

13 overall contributions marinas make to their 

14 well-being. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS