alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Scientific and Technical Review Board on 
Biomedical and Behavioral Research Facilities.
    Date: June 16, 2000.
    Time: 2:00 pm to 4:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: D.G. Patel, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, 301-
435-0824.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 23, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13730 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**VANTAGEMED CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of VantageMed Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip D. Ranger, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ PHILIP  D. RANGER   |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Philip D. Ranger        |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| March 31, 2006     |   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
§ 110.239 Island of Tinian, CNMI. ( a ) The anchorage grounds (based on 1944 Saipan Datum): ( 1 ) *Explosives Anchorage A.* A circular area intersecting the shoreline having a radius of 1,900 yards centered at latitude 14°58′57.0′′ N, longitude 145°35′40.8′′ E.
( 2 ) *Explosives Anchorage B.* A circular area intersecting the shoreline having a radius of 1,900 yards centered at latitude 14°58′15.9′′ N, longitude 145°35′54.8′′ E.
( b ) The regulations: Explosives Anchorages A and B; with the exception of explosives laden naval vessels at explosives anchorage A and B, no vessel may anchor within these areas without permission of the Captain of the Port. No vessel of more than 500 gross tons displacement may enter these areas except for the purpose of anchoring in accordance with this section.
[CGD 14-87-01, 52 FR 26146, July 13, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 390 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 390

Designating March 11, 2008, as National Funeral Director and Mortician 
                            Recognition Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2007

Mr. Kohl (for himself, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Brown, 
   and Mr. Chambliss) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 11, 2008

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating March 11, 2008, as National Funeral Director and Mortician 
                            Recognition Day.

Whereas the death of a family member, friend, or loved one is a devastating 
        emotional event;
Whereas the memorialization and celebration of the decedent's life is the fabric 
        of today's funeral service;
Whereas the family of the decedent has traditionally looked to funeral directors 
        and morticians for consolation, strength, and guidance in the planning 
        and implementation of a meaningful funeral ceremony;
Whereas funeral directors and morticians have dedicated their professional lives 
        to serving the families of their communities in their times of need for 
        generations with caring, compassion, and integrity;
Whereas these special men and women see their chosen profession as a higher 
        calling, a sacred trust, in serving every family regardless of social 
        standing, financial means, or time of day or day of the year, whenever a 
        death occurs; and
Whereas on this special day, March 11, 2008, it would be appropriate to pay 
        tribute to these funeral directors and morticians who, day in and day 
        out, assist our Nation's families in their times of sadness and grief 
        and help families mourn a death and celebrate a life: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) takes this opportunity to pay the Nation's collective 
        debt of gratitude for all the hours and all the times they have 
        put someone ahead of themselves by serving the living while 
        caring for the dead;
            (2) urges every American of every walk of life to embrace 
        each of these special individuals with heartfelt thanks for 
        their dedication to their profession; and
            (3) designates March 11, 2008, as ``National Funeral 
        Director and Mortician Recognition Day''.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-13374

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cr-00102-SPC-MRM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 7, 2019)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARTIN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal 

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 

997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced 

Case: 18-13374 Date Filed: 03/07/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 

F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of 

the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 18-13374 Date Filed: 03/07/2019 Page: 2 of 2
#### § 452.122 Delegates from intermediate bodies; method of election.

A delegate from an intermediate body who participates in the election of officers at a national or international convention must have been elected by a secret ballot vote of the individual members of the constituent units of that body. He may not participate if he was elected by the delegates who make up the intermediate body. The secret ballot election required by the Act is an election among the general membership and not an election of delegates by other delegates.
Argued and submitted September 14, 1992,

affirmed January 20,

reconsideration denied March 10,

petition for review denied May 25, 1993 (316 Or 528)

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Sam D. Ferguson, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, *Petitioner, v.*Sam D. FERGUSON, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-01766; CA A73719)

845 P2d 930

Adam T. Stamper, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Cowling & Heysell, Medford.

David Morrison, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Aller & Morrison, Roseburg.

*602Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Lees on,* Judges.

ROSSMAN, P. J.

*

 Leeson, J., *vice*Buttler, J., retired.

*603ROSSMAN, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that emergency room treatment of claimant’s surgical incision resulting from compensable carpal tunnel surgery is compensable.

Activities of claimant’s employment caused carpal tunnel syndrome, which employer accepted as compensable and for which claimant received surgery. One week after the carpal tunnel surgery, claimant fell at home and his sutures came out. He went to the emergency room for repair of the sutures. Employer refused to pay the emergency room bill, contending that the fall at home, rather than the compensable carpal tunnel syndrome, was the major contributing cause of the need for treatment.

ORS 656.005(7)(a) provides, in part:

> “A ‘compensable injury’ is an accidental injury * * * arising out of and in the course of employment requiring medical services or resulting in disability or death; an injury is accidental if the result is an accident, whether or not due to accidental means, if it is established by medical evidence supported by objective findings, subject to the following limitations:

> “(A) No injury or disease is compensable as a consequence of a compensable injury unless the compensable injury is the major contributing cause of the consequential condition.”

Employer argues that the emergency treatment must be considered under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A) as a “consequence of a compensable injury,” and that it is not compensable unless the carpal tunnel syndrome is the major contributing cause of the need for emergency room care.

The Board reasoned that the fall at home did not give rise to a new ‘ ‘injury, ’ ’ as such, and that the provisions of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A) therefore are not applicable. It held that the services are properly characterized as medical services “for conditions resulting from the injury” under ORS 656.245, and that claimant established compensability by showing that the emergency care bears a material relationship to the healing of the compensable carpal tunnel surgery. We agree.

*604When claimant fell at home and damaged his sutures, he suffered no new “injury” or condition different from the carpal tunnel syndrome. The emergency room treatment necessary to resuture the wound is compensable under ORS 656.245 as continued medical treatment bearing a material relationship to the compensable carpal tunnel syndrome.

Affirmed.
#### Goff v. Goff.

(Decided November 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1. Divorce — Abandonment—Allowance for Children. — Where the proof in a divorce suit sustained the wife’s charge of abandonment and cruel treatment, and entitled her to the care and custody of the infant children, and where the court granted divorce on her plea, and awarded custody of the children to her, and also held that the husband’s charge of adultery was groundless, it was error to limit the allowance in behalf of the children to one year.

*2.*Divorce — Alimony.—Lack of means other than daily earnings of the husband will not justify a failure to award alimony to the wife where she has no estate and is not in fault.

J. S. CLINE for appellant.

ROSCOE VANOVER for appellee.

Opinion op the -Court by

Judge Nunn.

Reversing.

Appellant, the wife, sued her husband, the appellee, for divorce and alimony on the grounds of abandonment .and cruel treatment. He answered with a counterclaim for divorce on the ground of adultery.

*716The proof sustained her charge of abandonment and cruelty. There was no proof in support of his charge of adultery. The court so held, and granted a divorce and awarded to the wife the care and custody of the two infant children. The husband was directed to pay $50 in quarterly payments to her for support of the children, being one year’s allowance, and the case was reserved for further orders on the question of allowance after that period. The husband was directed also to pay the costs of the action, including a fee of $25 to her attorney. The court refused to allow alimony to the wife. We approve of the chancellor’s judgment on all questions except alimony, and the form of the order as to support for the children. We are of opinion that alimony in some amount should have been allowed to her. She has no estate, was not in fault, and at the-time of the judgment was under 21 years of age. The-children are twins, and are now about three years old. She is entitled to help from her husband for the support of herself as well as her children. The husband is-young and strong, and is able and capable of supporting" the mother and children. His daily earnings constitute-his estate, but lack of other means will not ‘justify a. failure to award alimony.

The allowance of $50 per annum for the children should be in the form of a standing order, and the payments continue until such time as the court may otherwise direct, if circumstances and conditions so change as to demand a modification. The court will allow alimony to the wife in the sum of $150 per year, payable quarterly.

Judgment is reversed, with directions to proceed as. herein indicated.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35122-35123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-00-023]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: International Trade Commission.

Time and Date: June 5, 2000 at 2 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:   
    1. Agenda for future meeting: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-851 (Final) (Synthetic Indigo from China)--
briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to 
the Secretary of Commerce on June 12, 2000.).
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting,

[[Page 35123]]

may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: May 25, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13805 Filed 5-30-00; 10:18 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41407 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. RYAN CHRISTOPHER REAGAN

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-9-ALL

-------------------- June 26, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ryan Christopher Reagan appeals his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Reagan argues that the district court improperly assigned a two-level sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) for using a threat of death during the course of the robbery and that the district court’s imposition of a $1,500 fine was error. Section 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that when a defendant uses a threat of death as part of a bank robbery, a two-level enhancement applies. The threat of deathNo. 00-41407 -2- may be an oral or written statement, an act, a gesture, or a combination thereof. U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1, comment. (n.6). In committing the robbery, Reagan passed a note to the bank teller stating that, if she did not hand over all the money in the drawer, “I do have a device that will hurt a great deal,” he had his right hand in his pocket, and the Government introduced testimony that the bank teller feared for her life. The district court did not err in applying U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(F). The district court’s imposition of a fine $6,000 less than that recommended in the PSR is not clearly erroneous and is specifically authorized by U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(e). See United States v. O’Banion , 943 F.2d 1422, 1431-32 (5th Cir. 1991). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 105.225 Facility recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified in this section, the Facility Security Officer (FSO) must keep records of the activities as set out in paragraph (b) of this section for at least 2 years and make them available to the Coast Guard upon request.
( b ) Records required by this section may be kept in electronic format. If kept in an electronic format, they must be protected against unauthorized deletion, destruction, or amendment. The following records must be kept: ( 1 ) *Training.* For training under §§ 105.210 and 105.535, the date of each session, duration of session, a description of the training, and a list of attendees;
( 2 ) *Drills and exercises.* For each drill or exercise, the date held, description of drill or exercise, list of participants, and any best practices or lessons learned which may improve the Facility Security Plan (FSP);
( 3 ) *Incidents and breaches of security.* For each incident or breach of security, the date and time of occurrence, location within the facility, description of incident or breaches, to whom it was reported, and description of the response;
( 4 ) *Changes in MARSEC Levels.* For each change in MARSEC Level, the date and time of notification received, and time of compliance with additional requirements;
( 5 ) *Maintenance, calibration, and testing of security equipment.* For each occurrence of maintenance, calibration, and testing, record the date and time, and the specific security equipment involved;
( 6 ) *Security threats.* For each security threat, the date and time of occurrence, how the threat was communicated, who received or identified the threat, description of threat, to whom it was reported, and description of the response;
( 7 ) *Declaration of Security (DoS)* A copy of each single-visit DoS and a copy of each continuing DoS for at least 90 days after the end of its effective period;
( 8 ) *Annual audit of the FSP.* For each annual audit, a letter certified by the FSO stating the date the audit was completed; and
( 9 ) *TWIC Reader/Physical Access Control System (PACS).* For each individual granted unescorted access to a secure area, the: FASC-N; date and time that unescorted access was granted; and, if captured, the individual's name. Additionally, documentation to demonstrate that the owner or operator has updated the Canceled Card List with the frequency required in § 101.525 of this subchapter.
( c ) Any record required by this part must be protected from unauthorized access or disclosure. Electronic reader records and similar records in a PACS are sensitive security information and must be protected in accordance with 49 CFR part 1520.
[USCG-2003-14732, 68 FR 39322, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60541, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2006-23846, 83 FR 12102, Mar. 19, 2018; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57712, Aug. 23, 2016]
**EXHIBIT 12**

 

RATIO OF EARNINGS TOFIXED CHARGES
| MacDermid Inc.                      |
|-------------------------------------|
| Ratio of  Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| (in thousands)                      |

 
| ** **                                            | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                            | ** ** | **2006**                                   | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income from  continuing operations                    |       | $                                          | 51,850     |   | $ | 47,043 |   | $ | 53,224 |   | $ | 49,820 |   | $ | 31,477 |   |
| Income tax  expense                                   |       | 20,064                                     |       | 18,568 |   | 24,513 |   | 23,466 |   | 16,122 |   |
| Income from  continuing operations before tax expense |       | 71,914                                     |       | 65,611 |   | 77,737 |   | 73,286 |   | 47,599 |   |
| Add back fixed  charges included in income:           |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                      |       | 28,776                                     |       | 30,397 |   | 31,014 |   | 31,051 |   | 34,458 |   |
| Estimated  interest in rent expense                   |       | 7,926                                      |       | 8,045 |   | 2,324 |   | 2,405 |   | 2,612 |   |
| Adjusted  Earnings                                    |       | $                                          | 108,616    |   | $ | 104,053 |   | $ | 111,075 |   | $ | 106,742 |   | $ | 84,669 |   |
|                                                  |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                                        |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                      |       | 28,776                                     |       | 30,397 |   | 31,014 |   | 31,051 |   | 34,458 |   |
| Estimated  interest in rent expense                   |       | 7,926                                      |       | 8,045 |   | 2,324 |   | 2,405 |   | 2,612 |   |
| Total fixed  charges                                  |       | $                                          | 36,702     |   | $ | 38,442 |   | $ | 33,338 |   | $ | 33,456 |   | $ | 37,070 |   |
|                                                  |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to  fixed charges                   |       | 2.96                                       |       | 2.71 |   | 3.33 |   | 3.19 |   | 2.28 |   |

 

----