alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# eongre g ; g ; ot the anfteb otateg Mastittgtort, O.C. 20515 January 31, 2014 The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency William Jefferson Clinton Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: 1101A Washington, DC 20460
RE: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards Dear Administrator McCarthy: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has led the national effort to save lives and improve public health under the Clean Air Act. That is why we look forward to the EPA's issuance of the final Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards as soon as possible. As the EPA's own analysis shows, the proposed standards would prevent tens of thousands of asthma attacks and nearly 2,500 premature deaths every year by 2030, while also adding between $8 billion and $23 billion to our economy each year in economic and health care benefits. Cleaner gasoline and vehicle standards will dramatically improve public health by reducing nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, and other harmful pollutants and well-established causes of ozone pollution and particle pollution. The proposed lower sulfur gasoline will provide as much emissions reduction as removing an estimated 33 million cars from the road. According to the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, the proposed standards would increase the cost of gasoline by about one cent per gallon and add $150 to the cost of a new car, meaning our air can be much cleaner without a high cost to consumers. Those suffering most from air pollution cannot afford to wait any longer for relief. According to the Health Effects Institute, 30 to 45 percent of American city dwellers live close enough to a major roadway to face near-constant exposure to traffic-related air pollutants including nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and cancer causing agents such as benzene. Recently, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that outdoor air pollution and particulate matter cause lung cancer in humans. Air pollution affects everyone, but is especially harmful to people with asthma and cardiovascular disease, seniors, and young children. We urge EPA to

PRINTED ON RECYCI.ED PAPERfinalize the Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards so all Americans can

breathe easier.

Sincerely,

^. . :. r.► _. "^aii.r►^ + ^ ^ . . f . .r 

# ^ ^ ^,

/ tl^ ^ ! ^ ! _-------~ ..^

## cl 

# P^ ---- 

# Q? w 074" Lt

# Tj^,`^Letter signers: Jan Schakowsky, Earl Blumenauer, Lois Capps, Matt Cartwright,

David Cicilline, Gerry Connolly, Diana DeGette, Rosa L. DeLauro, John Dingell, Tammy Duckworth, Keith Ellison, Raul Grijalva, Alcee Hastings, Jared Huffman, Hank Johnson, William Keating, Joseph Kennedy II1, Daniel Kildee, Jim Langevin, Barbara Lee, Sander Levin, Zoe Lofgren, Alan Lowenthal, Betty McCollum, Jim McGovern, Michael Michaud, Jim Moran, Jerrold Nadler, Scott Peters, Chellie Pingree, Mark Pocan, Mike Quigley, Bobby Scott, Bradley Schneider, Allyson Schwartz, Louise Slaughter, Adam Smith, Jackie Speier, John Tierney, Paul Tonko, Chris Van Hollen, and Henry Waxman.

5
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000015 25-JAN-2012 01:58 PM

NO. SCPW-12-0000015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
KYLE QUILAUSING, Petitioner,

vs. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Kyle Quilausing's petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner provides no evidence that the Department of Public Safety has not properly adjusted petitioner's minimum and maximum term sentences in accordance with the circuit court's February 23, 2010 order. Petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See HRS § 602-5(3) (2010) (“The supreme court shall have jurisdiction and power . . . [t]o exercise original jurisdiction in all questions . . . arising under writs of mandamus directed to public officers to compelthem to fulfill the duties of their offices[.]”); In re Disciplinary Bd. of Hawaii Supreme Court , 91 Hawai ' i 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 693 (1999) (Mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available.). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, January 25, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 90 (Thursday, May 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 27178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11025]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 90 / Thursday, May 9, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 27178]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of May 17 President's Global Development Council Meeting

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the President's Global Development Council 
(GDC).
    Date: Friday, May 17, 2013.
    Time: TBD.
    Location: Eisenhower Executive Office Building, South Court 
Auditorium, Pennsylvania Avenue and 17th Street NW.
    Because of the exceptional circumstances of coordinating high-level 
schedules and other logistics this notice is being provided less than 
15 days prior pursuant to 5 CFR 102-3.150(b).

Agenda

I. Opening Remarks: Vision for the GDC
II. Overview of the GDC's Role & Efforts
III. Presentations on Key Issues
IV. Request for Feedback and Q&A

Stakeholders

    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to 
attend should RSVP to Interest_GDC@who.eop.gov. Please note that 
capacity is limited. Additional information on web streaming will be 
forthcoming on www.whitehouse.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayne Thomisee, 202-712-5506.

    Dated: May 3, 2013.
Jayne Thomisee,
Executive Director & Policy Advisor, U.S. Agency for International 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2013-11025 Filed 5-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-02-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20676]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board; Members

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice; SES Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review 
Board.

DATES: Effective Date: This appointment is effective on August 12, 
2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela S. Pope, Office of Human 
Capital (H), National Archives and Records Administration, 1 Archives 
Drive, St. Louis, MO 63138, (314) 801-0882.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review 
Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal of a senior 
executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to 
the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive 
performance.
    The members of the Performance Review Board for the National 
Archives and Records Administration are: Debra Steidel Wall, Deputy 
Archivist of the United States, Thomas E. Mills, Chief Operating 
Officer, Analisa J. Archer, Chief Human Capital Officer, and Micah M. 
Cheatham, Chief Financial Officer. These appointments supersede all 
previous appointments.

    Dated: August 9, 2011.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2011-20676 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . P D - 0332- 08 H A R D Y D O N C A PPS , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS O N R EH EA R I N G O F A PPE LL A N T ’ S PET I TI ON FOR DI S CRETI ON ARY REVI EW FROM THE S ECON D CO URT O F AP PEALS

J ACK CO UNTY P ercur iam . O P I N I O N A ppel l antw as convi ct ed of m ur der . T he j uryas s es s ed hi s puni s hm entat confi nementforl i fe, and a f i ne of $10, 000. T he C ourtof A ppeal s aff i rm ed the c o n v ic tio n . C apps v. State , ___S. W . 3d___ ( T ex. A pp. — FortW orth, N o. 02- 05- 00175- C R , del i ver ed D ece m ber6, 2007 ) . A ppel l ant ’ s pet i t i on fordi s cr et i onaryr evi ew w as di s m i s s ed as unt i m el yfi l ed on M ar ch 12, 2008. A ppel l anthas fi l ed a mot i on forC a pp s- 2 re h e a rin g re q u e stin g re in sta tem e n t o f h is p e tit io n so th a t itw ill b e c o n sid e re d b yth is C ourt . A ppel l ant ’ s m ot i on forr ehear i ng i s gr ant ed. H i s pet i t i on fi l ed on M ar ch 7, 2008, i s r ei ns t at ed as of A pr i l 30, 2008, and w i l l be cons i der ed i n acc or d w i th T ex. R . A pp. P. 68.

D el i ver ed A pr i l 30, 2008 D o n ot publi sh
§ 110.25 Salem Sound, Mass. ( a ) *Beverly Harbor, north of Salem Neck, Salem, MA.* A line extending from the northerly end of the Salem Willows Yacht Club House 360 yards bearing 281° true to position latitude 42°32′14.3′′ N., longitude 70°52′24.17′′ W.; thence north 275 yards to Monument Bar Beacon thence 540 yards bearing 080° to position latitude 42°32′25.3′′ N., longitude 70°52′2.1′′ W., thence 365 yards bearing 175° to position latitude 42°32′14.3′′ N., longitude 70°52′1.1′′ W.; thence 237° to the shore. [NAD83]
( b ) *Bass River.* All of the area upstream of the highway bridge (Popes Bridge) outside of the dredged channel.
( c ) *South Channel.* Bounded by a line commencing at the northern most point of Peach's Point at position latitude 42°31′08.6′′ N., longitude 70°50′32.8′′ W.; thence westerly to a point, at position latitude 42°31′21.9′′ N., longitude 70°51′15.1′′ W. off Fluen Point; thence westerly to a point at latitude 42°31′19.3′′ N., longitude 70°51′47.4′′ W. off Naugus Head; thence southwesterly to a point at latitude 42°31′00.3′′ N., longitude 70°51′16.6′′ W. east of Folger Point; thence to a point at latitude 42°30′38.3′′ N., longitude 70°52′34.6′′ W.; thence easterly to a point on Long Point at latitude 42°30′52.6′′ N., longitude 70°53′05′′ W. The areas will be principally for use by yachts and other recreational craft.
( d ) *Beverly and Mackerel Coves, north side of Beverly Harbor.* The water area enclosed by a line commencing at the southernmost point of Curtis Point in Beverly; thence bearing 238°, 1,400 yards to latitude 42°32′29.7′′ N., 70°51′32.1′′ W.; thence 284°, 1,475 yards to the western shoreline of Mackerel Cove; thence north northeasterly to the point of beginning.
( e ) *Collins Cove, Salem, MA.* The water area enclosed by a line beginning at Monument Bar Beacon; thence 242°, 580 yards to latitude 42°32′14.5′′ N., longitude 70°52′46.3′′ W.; thence 284°, 220 yards to latitude 42°32′16′′ N., longitude 70°52′55′′ W.; thence 231°, 525 yards to a point on the shoreline; thence following the shoreline and the western boundary of the special anchorage area as described in 33 CFR 110.25(a) to the point of beginning.
[USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27438, June 10, 2009, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014; USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Coleman, Marc, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>GEICO Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Theresa M. Ciccotto, J.), entered January 10, 2017. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.</p><p>For the reasons stated in<i> Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs.; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Bertrand, Edvard v GEICO Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-485 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 10, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### § 779.404 Other section 13(a)(1) employees employed in covered enterprises.

The “professional” employee or the “outside salesman” employed by a retail or service establishment in a covered enterprise, in order to qualify as a bona fide “professional employee” or as an “outside salesman,” must meet all the requirements set forth in the regulations issued and found in part 541, subpart A of this chapter, and further explained in subpart B thereof. The up-to-40 percent tolerance discussed in § 779.403 for “administrative and executive employees” of a retail or service establishment does not apply to the “professional employee” or the “outside salesman.”
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-65 Hearing Officer's decisions. ( a ) The Hearing Officer issues a written decision. Any decision to assess a penalty is based upon substantial evidence in the record. If the Hearing Officer finds that there is not substantial evidence in the record establishing the alleged violation or some other violation of which the party had full and fair notice, the Hearing Officer shall dismiss the case and remand it to the District Commander. A dismissal is without prejudice to the District Commander's right to refile the case and have it reheard if additional evidence is obtained. A dismissal following a rehearing is final and with prejudice.
( b ) If the Hearing Officer assesses a penalty, the Hearing Officer's decision contains a statement advising the party of the right to an administrative appeal. The party is advised that failure to submit an appeal within the prescribed time will bar its consideration and that failure to appeal on the basis of a particular issue will constitute a waiver of that issue in any subsequent proceeding.
[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by CGD 85-001A, 51 FR 19329, May 29, 1986]
#### § 100.500 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.243 Nanticoke River. ( a ) The draw of the Norfolk Southern Railway Bridge, mile 39.4 in Seaford, will operate as follows: ( 1 ) From March 15 through November 15, the draw will open on signal for all vessels except that from 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. at least 21 ⁄ 2 hours notice will be required.
( 2 ) At all times, from November 16 through March 14, the draw will open on signal if at least 21 ⁄ 2 hours notice is given.
( 3 ) When notice is required, the owner operator of the vessel must contact the bridge operator (Delmarva Central Railroad Company) with an estimated time of passage by calling 1-802-774-0305.
( b ) The draw of the SR 13 Bridge, mile 39.6, in Seaford shall: ( 1 ) Open on signal, except from 6 p.m. to 8 a.m., from April 1 through October 31; from November 1 through March 31, Monday to Friday and on Saturday and Sunday from 3:30 p.m. to 7:30 a.m., if at least four hours notice is given.
( 2 ) Open on signal, on Saturday and Sunday, from 7:31 a.m. through 3:29 p.m., from November 1 through March 31, if at least 24 hours notice is given.
[CGD05-06-044, 71 FR 53325, Sept. 11, 2006, as amended by USCG-2017-0162, 82 FR 50084, Oct. 30, 2017; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58278, Sept. 18, 2020]
§ 105.230 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level coordination and implementation. ( a ) The facility owner or operator must ensure the facility operates in compliance with the security requirements in this part for the MARSEC Level in effect for the port.
( b ) When notified of an increase in the MARSEC Level, the facility owner and operator must ensure: ( 1 ) Vessels moored to the facility and vessels scheduled to arrive at the facility within 96 hours of the MARSEC Level change are notified of the new MARSEC Level and the Declaration of Security is revised as necessary;
( 2 ) The facility complies with the required additional security measures within 12 hours; and
( 3 ) The facility reports compliance or noncompliance to the COTP.
( c ) For MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, the Facility Security Officer must inform all facility personnel about identified threats, and emphasize reporting procedures and stress the need for increased vigilance.
( d ) An owner or operator whose facility is not in compliance with the requirements of this section, must inform the COTP and obtain approval prior to interfacing with a vessel or continuing operations.
( e ) At MARSEC Level 3, in addition to the requirements in this part, a facility owner or operator may be required to implement additional measures, pursuant to 33 CFR part 6, 160, or 165, as appropriate, which may include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Use of waterborne security patrol;
( 2 ) Use of armed security personnel to control access to the facility and to deter, to the maximum extent practical, a transportation security incident; and
( 3 ) Examination of piers, wharves, and similar structures at the facility for the presence of dangerous substances or devices underwater or other threats.
§ 100.05 Definition of terms used in this part. ( a ) Regatta or marine parade means an organized water event of limited duration which is conducted according to a prearranged schedule.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *District Commander* means the Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the regatta or marine parade is intended to be held. (See Part 3 of this chapter for the geographical boundaries of Coast Guard Districts.)
( d ) *State authority* means any official or agency of a State having power under the law of such State to regulate regattas or marine parades on waters over which such State has jurisdiction.
( e ) *Navigable waters of the United States* means those waters described in § 2.36(a) of this chapter, specifically including the waters described in § 2.22(a)(2) of this chapter.
[CGFR 63-22, 28 FR 5155, May 23, 1963, as amended by CGD 75-098, 40 FR 49327, Oct. 22, 1975; USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42602, July 18, 2003]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.140 General.

In California, when fog prevails by day or night, the drawtender, after sounding the opening signal, shall toll a bell continuously during the approach and passage of a vessel.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.586 Annisquam River and Blynman Canal.

The draw of the Blynman (SR127) Bridge shall open on signal, except that, from noon to 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day, 6 p.m. on December 24 to midnight on December 25, and from 6 p.m. on December 31 to midnight on January 1, the draw shall open on signal if at least a two-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.

[CGD01-04-096, 69 FR 67058, Nov. 16, 2004]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

EDDIE EARVIN BELL, 

Appellant, 

No. 69670 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

FILED 

MAR 0 4 2016 

TRACE K. UNDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY _'

DEPUTY CLERK 

This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se appeal. 

Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. 

On January 25, 2016, appellant filed a notice of appeal. No 

appealable order was designated in the notice of appeal. To the extent 

that appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction, the notice of 

appeal is untimely filed. NRAP 4(b); NRS 34.575(1); NRAP 26(a); NRAP 

26(c). Because an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in 

this court, Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), 

we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, 

we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1 

C96....41,fiA-1/ ,J. 

Cherry 

'In light of this order, the pro se motion filed on February 23, 2016, 

is denied as moot. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

) 1947A ero 1e-070 
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge 

Eddie Earvin Bell 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e 2