alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.520 Electronic TWIC inspection. To conduct electronic TWIC inspection, the owner or operator of a vessel or facility must ensure the following actions are performed. ( a ) *Card authentication.* The TWIC must be authenticated by performing a challenge/response protocol using the Certificate for Card Authentication (CCA) and the associated card authentication private key stored in the TWIC.
( b ) *Card validity check.* The TWIC must be checked to ensure the TWIC has not expired and against TSA's list of cancelled TWICs, and no match on the list may be found.
( c ) *Identity verification.* ( 1 ) One of the biometric templates stored in the TWIC must be matched to the TWIC-holder's live sample biometric or, by matching to the PACS enrolled reference biometrics linked to the FASC-N of the TWIC; or
( 2 ) If an individual is unable to provide a valid live sample biometric, the TWIC-holder must enter a Personal Identification Number (PIN) and pass a visual TWIC inspection.
[USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57708, Aug. 23, 2016]
§ 502.18 Representation of the Secretary. ( a ) Except as provided in 28 U.S.C. 518(a) relating to litigation before the Supreme Court, the Solicitor of Labor may appear for and represent the Secretary in any civil litigation brought under the Act.
( b ) The Solicitor of Labor, through authorized representatives, shall represent the Administrator, WHD and the Secretary in all administrative hearings under the H-2A provisions of the Act and these regulations.
#### In the Matter of Elinore Mandell et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondent, and Ferne J. Goldstein, Respondent-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Ferne J. Goldstein, Respondent-Appellant, v Salvatore Zunno et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted August 22, 1996;

decided August 27, 1996

Motion by Mandell *et al.*for leave to appeal granted. Motion by Goldstein, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying the motion to strike, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          36,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,728
<PP&E>                                               2
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               26
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,259
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>
Other

1934.208
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 233 

Making minority party appointments for the Select Committee on Ethics 

for the 110th Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2007 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Making minority party appointments for the Select 

Committee on Ethics for the 110th Congress. 

1 Resolved, That the following be the minority member2 ship on the Select Committee on Ethics for the remainder 

3 of the 110th Congress, or until their successors are ap4 pointed: 

5 Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Isakson. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 	 Administration for Community Living 

Washington, D.C. 20201 

APR 23 2014 

PROGRAM INSTRUCTION 


ACL-PI-14-02 


TO: STATE AGENCIES ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF 

THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1965, AS AMENDED 

SUBJECT: Financial Reporting for Awards under Title III and Title VII ofthe Older 

Americans Act. 

LEGAL AND RELATED 

REFERENCES: Older Americans Act Amendments, 2006; Federal Funding Accountability 

and Transparency Act of2006 (Pub. L. 1 09-282), as amended by section 

6202 of Public Law 110-252; and 2 CFR Part 170. 

The purpose ofthis Program Instruction is to provide States with guidance for completion and 

submission ofthe Federal Financial Report (SF-425) and AoA Supplemental Form to the SF-425 

(Supplemental Form) beginning with the reporting period ending March 31, 2014. 

The Federal Funding Accountability Transparency Act (FFATA) requires grantees to report subaward 

activity at USASpending.gov. In addition, U.S. Department ofHealth & Human Services policy 

changes eliminated pooled payments and require payment requests to be done at the P account 

(subaccount) level. Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2014 Notice of Awards contains a unique grant number 

for each part/chapter under Title III and Title VII to accommodate these requirements. 

Effective with grant awards for FY 2014 and subsequent years, States are required to submit a separate 

SF-425 for each unique grant awarded under Title III and Title VII. States should continue to use the 

current Supplemental Form and submit a single combined Supplemental Form for all grant awards 

under Title III for each semi-annual reporting period. Title III and Title VII Grant awards issued for 

Fiscal Years prior to 2014 should continue to be reported using a combined SF-425 and combined 

Supplemental Form (Title III). 

There is no change to the frequency of reporting or the due dates for receipt in the Regional Offices. 

Reporting for the first six months of a fiscal year (October 1- March 31) is due in the Regional Office 

by April 30. Reporting for the second six months of a fiscal year (April1 - September 30) is due in the 

Regional Office by October 30. All open grant years will be reported on this schedule until all 

obligations are liquidated within the allowable two year period following the year ofthe awarding of 

the grant. For 425s not previously submitted as final, the final and 6th report is due 90 days after 

September 30 (i.e., due December 30). Grants awarded with realloted funds have an additional year 

for obligation liquidation. All reporting must be completed on an accrual basis. 

INQUIRIES: 	 Inquiries should be addressed to the appropriate Regional Administrators, 

Administration for Community Living 

Deputy 

~ Assistant Secretary Director 

Administration on Aging Office of Grants Management
§ 127.1207 Warning alarms. ( a ) Each marine transfer area for LHG must have a rotating or flashing amber light that is visible for at least 1,600 meters (1 mile) from the transfer connection in all directions.
( b ) Each marine transfer area for LHG must also have a siren that is audible for at least 1,600 meters (1 mile) from the transfer connection in all directions.
( c ) Each light and siren required by this section must be located so as to minimize obstructions. If any obstruction will prevent any of these alarms from meeting paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the operator of the waterfront facility handling LHG must propose for approval by the local COTP additional or alternative warning devices that provide an equivalent level of safety.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39798, Aug. 3, 1995; 60 FR 49509, Sept. 26, 1995; USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                                 Razorfish, Inc.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Razorfish, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10 Q/A for the interim period ended June 30,2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John J. Roberts, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 20, 2002               By: /s/ John J. Roberts
      ---------------                   -------------------------------------
                                        John J. Roberts
                                        Chief Financial Officer
From: Matthew Todd < ToddM@api.org >

Sent: 08/10/2012 02:25 PM

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: FCC Slides

Brenda,

Attached is a PDF of the slides on FCCs that were presented at our last meeting. Apologize for the delay. We added some additional background information to the slides. Let me know if you have questions or want to discuss.

Matt

Matthew Todd Senior Policy Advisor

API

202.682.8319

<< FCC SSM Slides.pdf >>
#### § 786.1 Enforcement policy concerning performance of nonexempt work.

The Division has taken the position that the exemption provided by section 13(b)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, will be deemed applicable even though some nonexempt work (that is, work of a nature other than that which characterizes the exemption) is performed by the employee during the workweek, unless the amount of such nonexempt work is substantial. For enforcement purposes, the amount of nonexempt work will be considered substantial if it occupies more than 20 percent of the time worked by the employed during the workweek.

[21 FR 5056, July 7, 1956]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Lydall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Form 10-K solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as a part of this Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



|              |  |                                                                     
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 1, 2011 |  | /S/    DALE G.
BARNHART                                             
|              |  | Dale G. BarnhartPresident and Chief Executive Officer               
|              | 
|March 1, 2011 |  | /S/    ERIKA G.
TURNER                                              
|              |  | Erika G. TurnerVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
NUMBER 13

- 18

- 00 434

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

MICHEL JOSEPH BOUTHI LLETTE

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and J ustices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its Criminal District Attorney, the

Honorable Constance Filley Johnson , has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant

the motion and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request,2 no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

N ORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

14th day of February , 2019.
§ 780.305 500 man-day provision. ( a ) Section 3(u) of the Act defines *man-day* to mean “any day during which an employee performs agricultural labor for not less than 1 hour.” 500 man-days is approximately the equivalent of seven employees employed full-time in a calendar quarter. However, a farmer who hires temporary or part-time employees during part of the year, such as the harvesting season, may exceed the man-day test even though he may have only two or three full-time employees.
( b ) All of the employer's employees who are engaged in “agricultural labor” except those specifically excluded by section 3(e) (see § 780.301) and those exempt under section 13(a)(14) (see subpart F of this part) must be counted in determining whether the 500 man-day test is met. This is true even though an employee may be exempt from the monetary provisions under another section of the Act. For example, a general manager of a farm may be an exempt executive employee under section 13(a)(1) or a sheepherder may meet the requirements of section 13(a)(6)(E). Regardless of those exemptions, their man-days of employment would be included in the man-day count of the employer.
( c ) A farmer whose crops are harvested by an independent contractor is considered to be a joint employer with the contractor who supplies the harvest hands if the farmer has the power to direct, control or supervise the work, or to determine the pay rates or method of payment for the harvest hands. (See § 780.331.) Each employer must include the contractor's employees in his man-day count in determining whether his own man-day test is met. Each employer will be considered responsible for compliance with the minimum wage and child labor requirements of the Act with respect to the employees who are jointly employed.
[37 FR 12084, June 17, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 27520, Oct. 4, 1973]
Skip to contentSkip to footer site map

This page location is:
                  -  Home                     -  Spanish                       -  Pages                         -  hipotecaria

Sign In

# Making Home AffordableAn official program of the Departments of the Treasury & Housing and Urban Development

                        - En Español  | 
                        - 繁體中文翻譯  | 
                        - 한국어  | 
                        - Português  | 
                        - Việt   | 
                        - Hmoob  | 
                        - Tagalog

Advanced Search

                      - US Department of the Treasury
                      - US Department of Housing and Urban Development

 
Home			» Spanish			» Programa Alternativas de Ejecución Hipotecaria Home Affordable (HAFA)

## 		 Programa Alternativas de Ejecución Hipotecaria Home Affordable (HAFA)	

**Venta Corta o Venta en Descubierto**

**Escritura en lugar de ejecución hipotecaria**

comuníquese con su administrador hipotecarioconsejero de vivienda aprobado por el Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano (Housing and Urban Development, HUD) 

**Obtenga más información**Aquí 

**Programa Making Home Affordable y otras opciones para conservar su vivienda**solicita una modificación plan de período de prueba

consejero de vivienda aprobado por el HUD 

**Cómo evitar la ejecución hipotecaria: Conozca sus opciones**Mire un vídeo 

                                      - SpanishCurrently selected

 

                                    - Treasury.gov
                                    - HUD.gov
                                    - WhiteHouse.gov

## Related Sites

                                    - FinancialStability.gov
                                    - MyMoney.gov

## Other Useful Sites

                                    - USA.gov
                                    - USAJOBS.gov
                                    - OPM.gov

                                    - 

###### Required Plug-ins

                                    - Adobe® Flash Player
                                    - Adobe® Reader®
                                    - MS Excel Viewer
                                    - MS PowerPoint Viewer
                                    - MS Word Viewer
                                    - QuickTime Player
                                    - Windows Media Player

                                    - Site Index  |
                                    - Privacy  |
                                    - FAQs  |
                                    - Contact Us
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.561 Kent Island Narrows. The draw of the U.S. Route 50/301 bridge, mile 1.0, Kent Island Narrows, operates as follows: ( a ) From November 1 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. but need not be opened from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m.
( b ) From May 1 through October 31, the draw shall open on signal on the hour and half-hour from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m., but need not be opened from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.
( c ) The draw shall open on signal for public vessels of the United States, state and local government vessels used for public safety purposes, and vessels in distress. Operational information will be available 24 hours a day by calling 1-800-543-2515.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD5-87-055, 53 FR 9888, Mar. 28, 1988; CGD05-05-019, 70 FR 38595, July 5, 2005]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6967

BARNEY ADRIAN DUNLAP , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 5:15

- cv - 00139

- MR )

Submitted : April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Barney Adrian Dunlap , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6967 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Barney Adrian Dunlap see ks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
In civil case s, pa rties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ).
The district court entered its order denying the motion to alter or amend the judgment on March 23, 2016. Dunlap filed the notice of appeal , at the earliest, on May 19, 2022, the date he certified he placed his notice of appeal in the mail. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (4th Cir. 1988). Because Dunlap failed t o file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Moreover, Dunlap previously appealed the district court’s orders denying his § 2254 petition and his motion to alter or amend the judgment and may not do so again. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6967 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2