alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Frank Hinshaw, SKYDIVING 

SCHOOL, INC., d/b/a SKYDIVE 

HA WAil AND ISLAND SKYDIVING, 

LLC 

COMPLAINANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF HA WAil 

RESPONDENT. 

Docket No. 16-12-04 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Prpceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, 

§ 16.ll(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Field 

Operations will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before 

Marchi I, 2013. 

An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. Accordingly, pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.ll(a), the Director's Determination will be issued 

on or before March 11, 2013. 

DEC 1 0 2012 

Date 
J 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December /0 , 2012 I placed in the United States mail (first 

class, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension ofTime addressed to: 

Frank Hinshaw 

Skydiving School Inc., 

d/b/a Skydive Hawaii 

PO Box 75520 

Honolulu, HI 96836 

Complainant 

Richard J. Durden 

Attorney at Law 

27987 Richmond Hill Road 

Conifer, CO 80433 

Counsel for Complainant 

Glenn I. Kimura 

Deputy Attorney General 

Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii 

465 S. King Street, Room 300 

Honolulu, ill 96813 

Counsel for Respondent 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100) 

~~ LkJ./ I ~( nneTOrgerson~ Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 539 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in State of Maine v. Douglas 

Rawlings, Jonathan Kreps, James Freeman, Henry Braun, Robert 

Shetterly, and Dudley Hendrick. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2008 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL), submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in State 

of Maine v. Douglas Rawlings, Jonathan Kreps, James 

Freeman, Henry Braun, Robert Shetterly, and Dudley 

Hendrick. 

Whereas, in the cases of State of Maine v. Douglas Rawlings 

(CR–2007–441), Jonathan Kreps (CR–2007–442), 

James Freeman (CR–2007–443), Henry Braun (CR– 

2007–444), Robert Shetterly (CR–2007–445), and Dudley Hendrick (CR–2007–467), pending in Penobscot 

County Court in Bangor, Maine, a defendant has subpoenaed testimony from Carol Woodcock, an employee in the 

office of Senator Susan Collins; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 539 ATS 

288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it apears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Carol Woodcock is authorized to tes2 tify in the cases of State of Maine v. Douglas Rawlings, 

3 Jonathan Kreps, James Freeman, Henry Braun, Robert 

4 Shetterly, and Dudley Hendrick, except concerning mat5 ters for which a privilege should be asserted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Carol Woodcock, and any other employee of the 

8 Senator from whom evidence may be sought, in the actions 

9 referenced in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20924]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12653 and <greek-i>12654]


North Dakota Disaster Number ND-00024

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Dakota (FEMA--1981--DR), dated 
06/24/2011.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 02/14/2011 through 07/20/2011.
    Effective Date: 08/10/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/22/2011.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/21/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of North Dakota, dated 06/24/2011 is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 09/22/2011.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-20924 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
RECEIVED 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SEP 2 6 2013 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS f..:!E!ARING DOCKET 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIO~'~;; . 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

AIRBORNE MAINTENANCE AND 

ENGINEERING SERVICES, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0291 

FAA Case No. 2011S0290032 

Judge Sullivan 

PROPOSED SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY PLAN 

Pursuant to the Judge's July 23,2013, Order, the FAA hereby submits the following 

proposed scheduling/discovery plan. The parties were not able to reach an agreement on a joint 

schedule. In particular, opposing counsel has indicated that his workload does not permit him to 

participate in discovery during 2013, or supervise another attorney in that attorney's participation 

in discovery during 2013, and the FAA was unable to agree that it was appropriate to put this 

case on hold for four months due to workload. Based on Respondent's originally proposed date 

ofJune 24,2013, for the first day of the hearing, the FAA proposes the following 

September 24,2013- Scheduling Conference 

October 8, 2013 -Initial Disclosures Due 

October 22, 2013 - Initial Written Discovery Requests Due 

December 2, 2013- Deposition period open 

January 17,2014- Close of General Discovery 

January 24, 2014 - Deadline to Initiate Supplemental Written Discovery 

March 11, 2014 - Deadline to File Judgment Motions 

March 25, 2014- Deadline to Files Motion Responses 

April 8, 2014- Deadline to File Motion Replies 

This would leave approximately eleven weeks to schedule a motion conference, set a deadline 

for pre-hearing submissions, and then set a hearing from June 24-26, 2014, or as available on the 

Judge's schedule. If the Judge agrees to Respondent's request that discovery not commence until 

2014, then the FAA would suggest that an appropriate discovery and motion period, as outlined 

above, would make a hearing in September 2014 appropriate. 

Opposing counsel has indicated that Respondent will agree to venue in Orlando, Florida. 
Respectfully submitted this 17th day of September, 2013. 

CHRISTOPHER R. STEVENSON 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing FAA's Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan was sent: 

original and one copy via certified mail to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

one copy via facsimile and certified mail to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

one copy via certified mail and facsimile to: 

Robert P. Silverberg, Esq. 

1101 30'h Street, NW, Suite 120 

Washington, D.C. 20007 

)}~~306 Program Analyst 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

SEP 1 7 2013 

Dated
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 1322 Directorate Identifier: 2011
- NM - 211
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Norm Black 09/14/2011 Concur. ATA Jo e White 09/14/2011 Concur.

Other/Additional Information:
#### § 780.404 Activities of the employer considered in some situations.

Although the activities of the individual employee, as distinguished from those of his employer, constitute the ultimate test for applying the exemption, it is necessary in some instances to examine the activities of the employer. For example, in resolving the status of the employees of an irrigation company for purposes of the agriculture exemption, the U.S. Supreme Court, found it necessary to consider the nature of the employer's activities (*Farmers Reservoir Co.* v. *McComb,* 337 U.S. 755).
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Vertical Computer System, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008  as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  April
      15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Richard
      WadeName: Richard
      WadeTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Vertical Computer
Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 21, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12986

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00024-CR-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

RASHAAD PENTA HINES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

_________________________

(February 21, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Garnett Harrison, appointed counsel for Rashaad Penta Hines in this direct
2

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hines’s conviction and sentence

is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT (11.1)

               THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

   CALCULATION OF PRIMARY NET EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
              (All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                           Year Ended December 31
                                                        ----------------------------
                                                          1995      1994      1993
                                                        --------  --------  --------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>       <C>
NET EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON AND COMMON
 EQUIVALENT SHARES:                                     $349,972  $695,725  $124,166
 
ADJUSTMENT FOR OTHER POTENTIALLY DILUTIVE
 SECURITIES - Interest Savings (net of tax) on
 Convertible Subordinated Debentures as if converted
 at the beginning of the period                                      5,661
                                                        --------  --------  -------- 
                                                        $349,972  $701,386  $124,166
                                                        ========  ========  ========
 
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT
 SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Average number of common shares outstanding             54,380    59,333    59,021
 
  Dilutive effect of stock options after
   application of treasury stock method                      913       621       572
 
  Adjustment of other potentially dilutive
   securities - Dilutive effect of Convertible
   Subordinated Debentures as if converted at the
   beginning of the year                                             2,601
                                                        --------   -------  --------
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON
 EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING                            55,293    62,555    59,593
                                                        ========  ========  ========
PRIMARY NET EARNINGS PER COMMON
 AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE                               $6.33    $11.21     $2.08
                                                        ========  ========  ========
</TABLE>

                                                                70
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 527 

Designating April 23, 2008, as ‘‘National Adopt A Library Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 22, 2008 

Mr. WEBB (for himself and Mr. WARNER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating April 23, 2008, as ‘‘National Adopt A Library 

Day’’. 

Whereas libraries are an essential part of our communities 

and our national system of education; 

Whereas the citizens of the United States benefit significantly 

from libraries that serve as an open place for people of 

all ages and backgrounds to make use of books and other 

resources that offer pathways to learning, self-discovery, 

and the pursuit of knowledge; 

Whereas the libraries of the United States depend on the 

generous donations and support of individuals and groups 

to ensure that those who are unable to purchase books 

still have access to a wide variety of resources; 

Whereas certain nonprofit organizations facilitate donations 

of books to schools and libraries across the country to exVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:44 Apr 23, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR527.ATS SR527

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 527 ATS 

tend the joys of reading to millions of people in the 

United States and prevent used books from being thrown 

away; and 

Whereas several States and Commonwealths that recognize 

the importance of libraries and reading have adopted resolutions commemorating April 23 as ‘‘Adopt A Library 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates April 23, 2008, as ‘‘National 

3 Adopt A Library Day’’; 

4 (2) honors organizations that help facilitate do5 nations to schools and libraries; 

6 (3) urges all people in the United States who 

7 own unused books to donate those books to local li8 braries; 

9 (4) strongly supports children and families who 

10 take advantage of the resources provided by schools 

11 and libraries; and 

12 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

13 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

14 activities. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                             
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2010 |  | /S/ THEODORE STALICK                                        
|                        |  | Theodore Stalick, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. License No. 09/79-0454]

Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide bridge financing to TouchCommerce, Inc., 30501 Agoura Road, Suite 203, Agoura Hills, CA 91301. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general operating purposes.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., Associates of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of TouchCommerce, Inc. Therefore, TouchCommerce, Inc. is considered an Associate of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. and this transaction is considered Financing an Associate, requiring SBA's prior approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within 15 days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

      ( print page 51119)    
 July 18, 2011.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2011-20837 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010.

2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### § 1.07-40 Counsel.

A party has the right to be represented at all stages of the proceeding by counsel. After receiving notification that a party is represented by counsel, the Hearing Officer directs all further communications to that counsel.
#### Ray *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Atkinson, J.

Under one phase of the testimony in this case, the jury . would have been authorized to find the accused guilty of the offense of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act without due oaution and circumspection; and it was therefore error for the judge to fail to instruct the jury on the law relating to that grade of manslaughter. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*53Indictment for murder. Before Judge Reagan. Telfair superior court. May *12,*1906.

Nat and Harvey Ray, brothers, and Glenn Ray, a son of Nat Ray, were working upon a road. The two brothers quarreled about *a*part of the work, and Nat struck Harvey three times with a stick. Harvey struck back with a hoe, knocking Nat down; whereupon Glenn Ray ran up and struck Harvey on the back of the head with ■a hoe, killing him. After verdict of guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the commissioú of an unlawful act, Glenn Ray moved for a new trial, one ground of the motion being that the court erred in declining to charge the jury upon the lower grade of homicide — involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection; it having been contended by the defense that Glenn Ray’s intention in striking his uncle was to knock him off from Nat Ray. \

*Thomas Eason, D. M. Roberts,*and *Eschol Graham,*for plaintiff in error. *E. D. Graham, solicitor-general, John R. Cooper,*and *B. M. Frizzelle,*contra.