alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**STORAGENETWORKS, INC.**

 

AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE RETENTION AGREEMENT 

 

This Amendment to Executive Retention Agreement is entered into as of the 14th day of May between StorageNetworks, Inc. (the “Company”) and             (the “Executive”). 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Executive Retention Agreement dated as of              (the “Agreement”).Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein. 

 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and theExecutive hereby agree as follows: 

 

1.    Section 4.2 ofthe Agreement is hereby amended such that all compensation payable to the Executive in cash under such Section 4.2 shall be payable on the Date of Termination rather than at the times specified in such Section 4.2. Without limiting the generality ofthe foregoing, the option of the Company to make the payments required under Section 4.2(a)(i)(3) in equal installments over a 12 month period is hereby eliminated. 

 

2.    Except as amended hereby, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment as of thedate set forth above. 

 

STORAGENETWORKS,INC.                  EXECUTIVE 

 

By:                                                                                                                

 

Title:
4319 000014319 000024319 000034319 000044319 000054319 000064319 000074319 000084319 000094319 000104319 000114319 000124319 000134319 000144319 000154319 000164319 000174319 000184319 000194319 000204319 000214319 000224319 000234319 000244319 000254319 000264319 000274319 000284319 000294319 000304319 000314319 000324319 000334319 000344319 000354319 000364319 000374319 000384319 000394319 000404319 000414319 000424319 000434319 000444319 000454319 000464319 000474319 000484319 000494319 000504319 000514319 00052
§ 127.1603 Hotwork. Each operator of a waterfront facility handling LHG must ensure that no person conducts welding, torch cutting, or other hotwork on the facility, or on a vessel moored to the facility, unless— ( a ) The COTP has issued a permit for that hotwork; and
( b ) The conditions of the permit are met.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5692, Feb. 2, 2022]
1 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Index for 

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0513] 

Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 

California; South Coast Air Pollution Control District; Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration; Greenhouse Gases

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

§ SIP submittal letter from CARB dated December 30, 2012 I-A 

§ SCAQMD, Final Staff Report, Proposed Rule 1714 Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration, October 2010 

I-B 

§ Rule 1714 - Prevention of Significant Deterioration for Greenhouse Gases - 

adopted November 5, 2010 

I-C 

§ CARB SIP Submittal Completeness Checklist I-D 

§ CARB SIP Rule Evaluation Form I-E 

§ SCAQMD Board Resolution dated November 5, 2010 I-F 

§ SCAQMD Board Minutes for Rule 1714 Dated November 5, 2010 I-G 

§ Certification of Publication – Public Notice dated October 6, 2010 I-H 

§ SCAQMD submittal letter to CARB dated December 15, 2010 I-I 

II. Federal Register Notices

§ [Reserved] 

III. Other Relevant Documents

§ EPA SIP Submittal Completeness letter dated March 22, 2011 

§ EPA SIP Submittal Completeness Checklist dated February 28, 2011 

§ Technical Support Document (TSD) for Rule 1714, EPA Region 9, dated July 

2012 

§ TSD Attachment 1: Rule 1714 adopted on November 5, 2010 

§ TSD Attachment 2: PSD Delegation Agreement between EPA Region 9 and 

SCAQMD, dated July 25, 2007 

§ TSD Attachment 3: Letter from SCAQMD to EPA dated June 30, 2010 

§ TSD Attachment 4: Letter from EPA to SCAQMD dated June 19, 2012 

§ TSD Attachment 5: Letter from SCAQMD to EPA dated August 15, 2012 

§ TSD Attachment 6: Evaluation of 40 CFR 51.166 and District Rule 2410, 

EPA Region 9, May 2012 

III-A 

III-B 

III-C 

III-D 

III-E 

III-F 

III-G 

III-H 

III-I 
2 

IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents

§ [Reserved] 

V. Comments on Proposed Action

§ [Reserved]
§ 100.20 Action on application for event assigned to State regulation by Coast Guard-State agreement. ( a ) Upon receipt of an application for a regatta or marine parade of a type assigned to a State for regulation under a Coast Guard-State agreement, the District Commander will forward the application to the State authority having cognizance of the event. Further processing and decision upon such an application shall be conducted by the State.
( b ) [Reserved]
Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2017 Final Allocation

8/14/2017

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII

Alabama $241,378 $76,215 $317,593

Alaska $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Arizona $344,482 $84,481 $428,963

Arkansas $148,565 $48,157 $196,722

California $1,658,799 $471,073 $2,129,872

Colorado $234,091 $57,391 $291,482

Connecticut $179,611 $59,907 $239,518

Delaware $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

District of Columbia $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Florida $1,181,028 $344,252 $1,525,280

Georgia $421,958 $103,450 $525,408

Hawaii $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Idaho $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Illinois $586,928 $197,384 $784,312

Indiana $309,532 $98,224 $407,756

Iowa $158,494 $55,927 $214,421

Kansas $135,767 $45,843 $181,610

Kentucky $215,060 $66,595 $281,655

Louisiana $211,300 $68,518 $279,818

Maine $79,448 $23,712 $103,160

Maryland $273,372 $78,087 $351,459

Massachusetts $331,591 $109,606 $441,197

Michigan $503,370 $160,862 $664,232

Minnesota $258,928 $76,347 $335,275

Mississippi $139,902 $45,198 $185,100

Missouri $301,499 $97,643 $399,142

Montana $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Nebraska $88,662 $29,770 $118,432

Nevada $133,897 $32,827 $166,724

New Hampshire $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

New Jersey $425,463 $143,950 $569,413

New Mexico $102,596 $26,393 $128,989

New York $937,811 $318,066 $1,255,877

North Carolina $479,833 $126,782 $606,615

North Dakota $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Ohio $586,793 $197,185 $783,978

Oklahoma $182,045 $60,208 $242,253

Oregon $211,238 $56,795 $268,033

Pennsylvania $684,715 $242,944 $927,659

Rhode Island $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

South Carolina $250,794 $63,080 $313,874

South Dakota $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Tennessee $322,105 $91,810 $413,915

Texas $1,046,876 $274,281 $1,321,157

Utah $99,455 $24,837 $124,292

Vermont $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

Virginia $380,213 $102,820 $483,033

Washington $335,213 $86,291 $421,504

West Virginia $106,066 $36,736 $142,802

Wisconsin $288,676 $90,309 $378,985

Wyoming $79,072 $23,712 $102,784

American Samoa $9,884 $2,964 $12,848

Guam $39,536 $11,856 $51,392

Northern Mariana Islands $9,884 $2,964 $12,848

Puerto Rico $189,058 $54,217 $243,275

Virgin Islands $39,536 $11,856 $51,392

TOTAL $15,814,316 $4,742,357 $20,556,673
**1998-  Sugar and Sweeteners Report 12.02.98 SSS-224   [ Summary |   Full Text |   Zip file 243kB ]   Sugar and Sweeteners Report 05.21.98 SSS-223 [ Summary | Full Text | Zip file 137kB ]
**
June 22, 2012


 


Via Facsimile


 


Biomarker LLC


14785 Omicron Drive, Suite 104


San Antonio, TX 78245


Attn: Andras Koser


 


		Re:	Supply Agreement dated June 23, 2011, by and between Biomarker LLC and Atossa Genetics Inc. (the “Agreement”)



 


Dear Mr. Koser:


 


We are writing with regard to the above-referenced
Agreement between you and Atossa Genetics Inc. Section 6.1 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement shall have an initial term
of one year from the date of signature and that the Agreement may be renewed for additional one-year terms by written consent of
the parties. Because the Agreement was signed on June 23, 2011, the initial term is set to expire on June 23, 2012. In accordance
with Section 6.1 of the Agreement, we wish to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one-year term, effective from
June 23, 2012 through June 23, 2013.


 


Please countersign below and return this
document to me at your earliest convenience as follows:


 


Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D.


Atossa Genetics Inc.


4105 E. Madison Street, Suite 320


Seattle, WA 98112


Facsimile: (206) 325-6087


 


Sincerely,


Steven C. Quay, M.D., PH.D.


/s/ Steven C. Quay


 


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:


 


Biomarker LLC


 





	By: 	/s/ Andras Koser	 
	Name: Andras Koser	 
	Title: Managing Partner	 










4105 E. Madison Street, Suite 320 •
Seattle, Washington • 98112


T: +1 206.325.6086 F: 206.325.6087


www.AtossaGenetics.com


31090794_1
#### Greer *v.*City of Jackson.

Argued November 19,-

-Decided December 11, 1906.

Certiorari. Before Judge Keagau.- Butts superior court. September 28, 1906.

*7. A. Wright*and *J. T. Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. E. Watkins,*contra.

Evans, J.

1. In the absence of any charter provision to the contrary, an authorized municipal ordinance is effective from its enactment, neither publication nor promulgation being necessary to its validity.

*2.*The testimony before the mayor authorized a finding that the defendant had violated the ordinance forbidding the keeping for illegal sale of intoxicating liquors; and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to set aside the judgment of conviction on certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.461 Lacassine Bayou.

The draws of the S14 bridge, mile 17.0, and the Southern Pacific railroad bridge, mile 20.4, both near Hayes, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.

[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984; 49 FR 37381, Sept. 24, 1984]
Hillsborough

No. 6883

#### Roger A. Caron v. William Labrie

January 31, 1975

*21
      *Wiggin, Nourie, Sundeen, Pingree & Bigg (Mr. Dort S. Bigg, Jr.*orally) for the plaintiff.

*Gerard O. Bergevin*and *Richard J. D’Amours (Mr. Bergevin*orally) for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant’s exceptions to a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $3,633.75 were reserved and transferred by the Trial Court, *Gann,*J. Subsequent to oral argument this court received a typewritten letter purportedly signed by the plaintiff. In substance this letter states that the claim of the plaintiff is false and he is “retracting” his suit against the defendant. On order of the court, counsel for the parties again appeared orally. They informed the court that neither had any knowledge of the authenticity of the letter and that plaintiff’s counsel had been unable to locate his client. The case is remanded to the trial court for such further hearing as it deems necessary to determine the authenticity and effect of the letter received by this court.

*Remanded.*
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the
“Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Glenn A. Kleinert, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February
27, 2009








/s/
Glenn A. Kleinert


Glenn A. Kleinert


President and Chief Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 520.403 What information is required when applying for authority to pay less than the minimum wage? ( a ) A separate application must be made for each plant or establishment requesting authorization for employment of messengers and/or learners at subminimum wages, on the official form furnished by the Wage and Hour Division, containing all information required by the form including: ( 1 ) Information concerning efforts made by the applicant to obtain experienced workers in occupation(s) for which learners are requested;
( 2 ) The occupations/industry in which the messenger(s) and/or learner(s) are to be employed;
( 3 ) A statement explaining why employment of messenger(s) and/or learners(s) at subminimum wages is needed to prevent curtailment of employment opportunities;
( 4 ) The number of messengers and/or learners the applicant anticipates employing at subminimum wages under special certificate;
( 5 ) If requesting authorization for the employment of learners at subminimum wages for a learning period greater than 240 hours, information pertinent to the extraordinary circumstances necessitating such a request. While each such request will be considered on its own merit, it is anticipated that such authorizations would be limited to occupations requiring an extended period of specialized training;
( 6 ) The number of messengers and/or learners hired at subminimum wages during the twelve-month period prior to making application;
( 7 ) Total number of nonsupervisory workers in the particular plant or establishment for which a certificate is requested;
( 8 ) The number of experienced workers in the learner occupations and their straight-time average hourly earnings during the last payroll period and the corresponding payroll period in the prior year; and
( 9 ) The type of equipment to be used by learners.
( b ) For apprentices, the employer or apprenticeship committee must submit a copy of the registered apprenticeship program.
( c ) Any applicant may also submit such additional information as may be pertinent. Applications which fail to provide the information required by the form may be returned to the applicant with a notation of deficiencies and without prejudice against submission of a new or revised application.
(The information collection requirements contained in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1235-0001) [62 FR 64959, Dec. 9, 1997, as amended at 82 FR 2227, Jan. 9, 2017]
§ 127.1205 Emergency shutdown. ( a ) Each piping system used to transfer LHG or its vapors to or from a vessel must have a quick-closing shutoff valve to stop the flow of liquid and vapor from the waterfront facility handling LHG if a transfer hose or loading arm fails. This valve may be the isolation valve with a bleed connection required by § 127.1101(c).
( b ) The valve required by paragraph (a) of this section must be located as near as practicable to the terminal manifold or loading-arm connection and must— ( 1 ) Close on loss of power;
( 2 ) Close from the time of activation in 30 seconds or less;
( 3 ) Be capable of local manual closing and remotely controlled closing; and,
( 4 ) If the piping system is used to transfer a flammable LHG, either have fusible elements that melt at less than 105 °C (221 °F) and activate the emergency shutdown, or have a sensor that performs the same function.
( c ) A remote actuator for each valve must be located in a place accessible in an emergency, at least 15 meters (49.2 feet) from the terminal manifold or loading arm, and conspicuously marked with its designated function. When activated, the actuator must also automatically shut down any terminal pumps or compressors used to transfer LHG, or its vapors, to or from the vessel.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39797, Aug. 3, 1995; 60 FR 49509, Sept. 26, 1995]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13308]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIMES AND DATES:  1:00 p.m., Monday, June 5, 2000; 8:30 a.m., Tuesday, 
June 6, 2000.

PLACE: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the Four Seasons Hotel, One Logan 
Square, in the North Ballroom.

STATUS: June 5 (Closed); June 6 (Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  
Monday, June 5-1:00 p.m. (Closed)
1. Strategic Planning.
2. Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in Docket 
No. C99-4, Complaint of Continuity Shippers Association.
    3. eBusiness Approval Process.
    4. Financial Performance.
    5. Office of Inspector General Midyear Budget and Performance 
Results.
    6. Compensation Issues.
    7. Personnel Matters.
Tuesday, June 6-8:30 a.m. (Open)
    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, May 1-2, 2000.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.
    3. Cycling Team.
    4. Audit Committee Charter.
    5. Briefing on Information Platform.
    6. Capital Investments.
a. Recognition Improvement Program.
b. Phoenix, Arizona, Priority Mail--Postal Processing Center.
    7. Report on the Philadelphia Performance Cluster.
    8. Tentative Agenda for the July 10-11, 2000, meeting in 
Washington, D.C.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David G. Hunter, Assistant 
Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

David G. Hunter,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13308 Filed 5-23-00; 2:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 150/5200-28D - Notices to Airmen (NOTAMS) for Airport Operators (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 150/5200-28D
- Title
- Notices to Airmen   (NOTAMS) for Airport Operators
- Date cancelled
- 2015-10-08
- Cancellation notes
- 150/5200-28E
- Date issued
- 2008-01-28
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AAS-300, Office of Airport Safety and Operations - Airport Safety & Operations Division 
- Description
-  	Provides guidance on using the NOTAM system for airport condition reporting and describes significant changes to the format of Distant (D) and Local (L) NOTAMs.	See also NOTAM Briefing: Guidance for NOTAM D Standardization (PDF). 
- Content
-    -  150/5200-28D  (PDF) 
  -  150/5200-28D  (MS Word) 
  -  Errata Sheet for AC 150/5200-28D (April 22, 2008)  (MS Word) 
- Cancels
-  CancelsNumberTitleDate150/5200-28CNotices to Airmen (NOTAMS) for Airport Operators												Provides guidance on using the NOTAM system for airport condition reporting. 											2006-07-24 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
Program Instructions

AOA-PI-98-04 - August 4, 1998

TO : STATE AGENCIES ON AGING ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER 

AMERICANS ACT, AS AMENDED 

SUBJECT : Certification of Maintenance of Effort for Fiscal Year 1997

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES : 45 CFR 1321.49; and Section 309(c) of the Older 

Americans Act, as Amended

This Program Instruction requests the authorized official in each State Agency on Aging to submit a 

certification on maintenance of effort under Title III of the Older Americans Act for Fiscal Year 1997. 

As set forth in 45 CFR 1321.49, the state agency maintenance of effort level is to be determined 

annually. 

45 CFR 1321.49 states:

"In order to avoid a penalty, each fiscal year the state agency, to meet the required non-federal share 

applicable to its allotments under this part, shall spend under the State plan for both services and 

administration at least the average amount of State funds it spent under the plan for the three 

previous fiscal years. If the state agency spends less than this amount, the Assistant Secretary 

reduces the state's allotments for supportive and nutrition services under this part by a percentage 

equal to the percentage by which the state reduced its expenditures."

In reporting the amount of state expenditures for the maintenance of effort requirement, states may 

include expenditures incurred under the cost allocation plan for the State Agency. The authorized 

official in each State Agency on Aging is requested to certify to the Administration on Aging the 

amount of State resources expended in Fiscal Year 1997 to meet the maintenance of effort 

requirements under Title III of the Older Americans Act, and whether that amount was or was not 

equal to the required maintenance of effort level.

Attached is a certification form which has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). The certification form must be signed by the authorized State Agency official and submitted to 

the Regional Administrators on Aging not later than August 28, 1998.

ATTACHMENT

Certification of Maintenance of Effort Form OMB-0980-0180 
Jeanette C. Takamura

Assistant Secretary for Aging

DUE DATE: August 28, 1998 to Regional Administrators on Aging

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS regional offices.