alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.491 Red River. ( a ) The draw of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 90.1, at Alexandria, shall open on signal if at least eight hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the US 165 (Jackson St.) bridge, mile 88.6, at Alexandria, shall open on signal if at least eight hours notice is given; except that, from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. the draw need not be opened Monday through Friday except holidays.
( c ) The draws of the bridges above mile 105.8 through mile 234.4 need not open for passage of vessels. The owner or agency controlling the bridge must restore the draw to full operation within three months if notified by the District Commander that the needs of navigation require resumed operation of the spans.
( d ) The draws of the bridges above mile 234.4 to mile 276 need not be opened for passage of vessels.
( e ) When a vessel which has given notice fails to arrive at the time specified in the notice, the drawtender shall remain on duty for up to two additional hours to open the draw if that vessel appears. After that time, a new notice of the appropriate length of time is required.
[CGD08-94-026, 60 FR 7123, Feb. 7, 1995, as amended by CGD08-95-024, 61 FR 4886, Feb. 9, 1996; CGD08-96-025, 61 FR 39873, July 31, 1996; CGD8-97-037, 62 FR 52502, Oct. 8, 1997; CGD08-00-020, 65 FR 52022, Aug. 28, 2000; USCG-2017-0911, 84 FR 26766, June 10, 2019]
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Eastgate Acquisitions Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/BRIAN LUKIAN Brian Lukian Chief Financial Officer September 25, 2013    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>
                                             EXHIBIT (24)

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                        -----------------

   Each of the undersigned directors of The Narragansett Electric
  Company (the "Company"), individually as a director of the Company, hereby
  constitutes and appoints John G. Cochrane, Robert K. Wulff, and Geraldine
  M. Zipser, individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on behalf of the
  undersigned the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
  December 31, 1997, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission, and to execute any appropriate amendment or amendments
  thereto as may be required by law.

  Dated this 18th day of March, 1998.

                                     s/Michael F. Ryan
  _________________________          _________________________
  Richard W. Frost                   Michael F. Ryan


  s/Cheryl A. LaFleur                s/Richard P. Sergel
  _________________________          _________________________
  Cheryl A. LaFleur                  Richard P. Sergel


  s/Robert L. McCabe                 s/Ronald L. Thomas
  _________________________          _________________________
  Robert L. McCabe                   Ronald L. Thomas


  s/Lawrence J. Reilly
  _________________________
  Lawrence J. Reilly
1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: State of Texas v. Philip Mbianda Aweh

Appellate case number: 01-18-01111-CR

Trial court case number: 14-DCR-067793

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, The State of Texas, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order 

granting a mistrial in the underlying proceeding. On February 12, 2019, we abated the 

appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to allow Brian M. Middleton, District 

Attorney for the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County, to move for permission to 

disqualify himself and his Assistant District Attorneys from the case and request the 

appointment of a district attorney pro tem. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 2.07. 

The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record that includes the trial court’s 

order granting the motion of disqualification of the District Attorney’s Office for the 

268th District Court and appointing Mike Elliott as “District Attorney Pro Tem to

represent the State of Texas” in proceedings against appellant. Accordingly, we 

reinstate the appeal on the Court’s active docket.

We direct the Clerk of this Court to note Mike Elliott’s appearance as District 

Attorney Pro Tem in this appeal on the docket of this Court. 

The clerk’s record was filed January 9, 2019. The reporter’s record, received on 

March 4, 2019, is now filed in this appeal. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed within 30 

days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___March 12, 2019__
#### § 110.71b Wye River, Wye, Md.

The waters of a cove on the western shore of Wye River opposite Drum Point enclosed by a line drawn from latitude 38°53′17′′ N., longitude 76°11′23′′ W., to latitude 38°53′18′′ N., longitude 76°11′23′′ W., to latitude 38°53′18′′ N., longitude 76°11′13′′ W.; thence following the shoreline to the point of beginning.

[CGD 78-026, 44 FR 6910, Feb. 5, 1979]
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
YORK TELECOM CORPORA TION, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2017

- 1598

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15

- cv

- 00489

- LKG, Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

D ANIEL J OSEPH D ONOHUE , Polsinelli, PC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by W ALTER A.I. W ILSON

.

E LIZABETH A NNE S PECK , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for d efendant

- appellee. Also represented by C HAD A. R EADLER , R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R ., S TEVEN J. G ILLINGHAM

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK , M OORE , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 10 , 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
#### Reid, receiver, *v.*DeJarnette.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 13, 1906.

Complaint. Before Judge Lewis. Putnam superior court. September 18, 1905.

*J. H. Hall,*for plaintiff. *Turner & Adams,*for defendant.

■Fish, O. J.

This ease, upon its facts, is controlled by the decision rendered in *Reid*v. *DeJarnette,*123 *Ga.*787. See also Libby *v.*Tobey, 82 Me. 397; Dunn v. Howe, 96 Fed. Rep. 160.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
77)
39°07'30" 5 Tz

4332000 |

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 98-520

PLATE 1

BALTIMORE 18 MI. 5662 111 NE

5062 1 NW 12 MI. TO U.S. 40
COLUMBIA 9 MI. 55! 1 335 t 1 336 {830 000 FEET ff savace 1M [43 (SAVAGE)
5) Y 5 = == SZCV\WYee x We NWelig -

he ¢

N

»Bacontewn
, Rec, Area

Cogeine 2

Water

a) \
Earl Pies
Country Bic \

ae al

SK COLESVILLE 0.8 MI

a)

2977 7,

4326 FS =]

5562 11 SE
ENSINGTON)

4324

s

SILVER SPRING (GA, AVE.) 3 MI

aM
Next the
NapWindhdr Mang
Weeees Hs"
5s

&
ae
ae zu
Be 0 ze ee]
when 2 Eyl Se
EA 4 / 1s Fra \ Gg’
g\eade fy
; 7 4 ig / / \ i / ak | / ’ \ [3000 FRET
3 yf / an | / y) \
5 / \ // \ \ t- 2000
& Fi / J J oe | 1. /
/ l fp (Zo A \ \ bivoe
: surface fe, / / / V4 fh
oa SEA ; | SEA
= LEVEL y / \ \ LEVEL
: r
10004 Wi rs \ \ 1200
G
y a Bin i
2000 4 / | 2a00
3000 4, / \ L 30u0
\ \
Le |
Cae scaige agape terns Crean
fe
oe
<
&
® fay x +
ray Me 2 e
ine x © Ay c © x ¢€
wg sa a ha (eq “ © i c
Sy a a SE BGie I w s
Aj < 4 = = is S w
¥ it Q £ 6 § ers =) nl Ree A!
eg £ zi 2 & a SBS ° E & e [4000 FEET
1 = + # ly = 3 V =
We , & lf : Ve: Va FS a eal A a
Mot 2 / gO BRN |e A ee
4 4 H / eE \ [ \ 7 7) Ya | AR L- 2000
474% fo a 6 (7a
44 Zt RS 7 |e / “fb 1000
; VU \ * U Surface
\ 7 eee
- y % / | My v4 /
\ / | 7\ / — [900
\/ of
\t'? ,7ie? MN eae
/ Ly)
oy | 000
\
Cretaceous, Tertiary,and Quaternary Deposits P |
not shown on section |
|
y
z
we 5 Se
ray uv 2
3 <2 ws b ER $
y SN Ss 240
x «es 25 aie 3 5
8 re ouk S582 oi S$ we
‘ ae < & is S85. ze ee iia)
z 4 re 7 u bata K 9
o 30007 [ay & iS 2 / al/ | 4 A WIS a 7 / | ny E | 3000
3 es ak ae eth kK oo
8 = TX. 8 MYA Z| 22 a Rope / > <
ra a / \ 1 EIS 7 4 13 ¢
i 2000-4 we YN VY J | 7 Ble Va [7 a Sane
‘ S/N FAR 7 a We uv be
z (Ne) is Ul pe Y y Dp WA lal 7) y
a bee Be ey et Yer / L ie
€2|_-€zm\e2| | fy 24 f Al \f? ar yp lisuee /
SEA wan D 7 —r a ie ah SEA
Leven Say / 4 pA G /\ y Ppy yi je | 7 Levee
+ a Ay a / Mt / / / 7 Wa hes -_ { /
to00of So em \ 3 7 yy 7 Vv ¢ #4 \ L joo0
4 “ /~ / 4A a Liv #
Rte \ Aig 7% # || % Ava | {
| s= Ay Pad e *® ! 4 ef
2000 a Ney / 7 va vA + 2000
N 4 \ ARR \ os / )
a oN N Z a y Vk / / 4 7 y /
a = ooo Se Lo A AY ui y liye Zo 3000
NS AY Ci x i
mi Si or areigTM aterm Permits NF] 7 |
Base from U.S. Geological Survey Geology mapped by Drake in 1991, 1993, and 1994;
Beltsville, 1964 (photorevised 1979); assisted in 1991 by National Association of Geology
Laurel and Washington East, 1965 Teachers (NAGT) intern Amy Sapp, and in 1993 by
(photorevised 1979) NAGT intern Miriam Hart and Volunteer for Science
Catlin Lanham
GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PIEDMONT IN THE BELTSVILLE, LAUREL, AND WASHINGTON
This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for comformity with
EAST QUADRANGLES, MONTGOMERY, PRINCE GEORGES, HOWARD, AND ANNE Strep Coda, Ay use of ato rote or frm nares for save
purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
ARUNDEL COUNTIES, MARYLAND, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

By
Avery Ala Drake, Jr.
1998
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 545 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 545

     Honoring the recipients of the El Dorado Promise scholarship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2008

   Mr. Pryor (for himself and Mrs. Lincoln) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Honoring the recipients of the El Dorado Promise scholarship.

Whereas the 2000 United States Census determined that El Dorado, Arkansas, had a 
        significantly lower percentage of residents with degrees from 
        institutions of higher education and a significantly higher percentage 
        of families who fell below the poverty line than the national average;
Whereas it is increasingly important for students to obtain a college education 
        in order to keep up with the demands of the modern workforce and global 
        economy;
Whereas the El Dorado Promise scholarship is a tuition scholarship, created and 
        funded by Murphy Oil Corporation, which enables all eligible high school 
        graduates of the El Dorado Public School District in El Dorado, 
        Arkansas, to attend any accredited 2- or 4-year, public or private, 
        college or university;
Whereas school enrollment in the El Dorado Public School District has 
        significantly increased since the El Dorado Promise scholarship program 
        was established, despite a 15-year trend of decreasing enrollment;
Whereas the El Dorado Promise scholarship program increased the number of El 
        Dorado High School students who chose to attend college after graduation 
        by 20 percent; and
Whereas, on April 30, 2008, El Dorado High School students who receive El Dorado 
        Promise and other academic scholarships sign academic letters of intent 
        for the colleges they will be attending upon graduation: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the recipients of the El Dorado Promise 
        scholarship for choosing to further their education;
            (2) recognizes April 30, 2008, as the second Academic 
        Signing Day for graduating El Dorado High School students 
        receiving El Dorado Promise and other academic scholarships;
            (3) acknowledges that the El Dorado Promise scholarship 
        program is important for the revitalization of southern 
        Arkansas; and
            (4) recognizes Murphy Oil Corporation for its efforts to 
        ensure that children from southern Arkansas, who might 
        otherwise struggle in financing a college education, are able 
        to attend college.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9

<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<CASH>                                             269,203
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   230,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,296,010
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                          7,568,135
<ALLOWANCE>                                        105,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,601,100
<DEPOSITS>                                       9,095,026
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  5,025
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             5,637
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,444,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  13,601,100
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    133,632
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   70,380
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    10,004
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   214,016
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  95,369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97,645
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              116,371
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       63,368
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    267,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (194,773)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (194,773)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (121,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.22)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.69
<LOANS-NON>                                              0
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    371,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    42,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            0
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  105,677
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               105,677
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Submitted on record and briefs October 30,

reversed and remanded December 16, 1992

#### EDWARD E. ALLEN, *Appellant, v.*STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent.*

(91CV204; CA A72027)

842 P2d 813

Edward Eugene Allen, Salem, filed the opening brief *pro se.*John E. Storkel, Salem, filed the supplemental brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Durham, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*258PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief. *Boone v. Wright,*314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992). We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.
SERVED: JANUARY 29, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARY E. BOCHIARDY 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0853 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011EA170066) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

\ -·-··--z r·--····-··· :1 

'····· ~~···· 

'~J .. ,. 

''···-... Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law l dge . · 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Mary E. Bochiardy, Respondent 

1450 Sunset Point Road 

Clearwater, FL 33755-1536 

TEL: I 386-214-0414 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

ONE COPY 

Judith L. Vaughan, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3255 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. DepartJ:nent of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0853 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 2059 I; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0671 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. GENE DEVERAUX,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 9 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 5 2021

03/05/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0671
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1790

TONITA HALL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; OFFICE OF INSPECTOR 

GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; FSA OMBUDSMAN U.S. 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE; SALLIE MAE,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:09-cv-01340-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 24, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tonita Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Deirdre Gaudet Brou, Special 

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, Paul 

Kugelman, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, 

Richmond, Virginia, Amy Sanborn Owen, COCHRAN & OWEN, LLC, 

Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tonita Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

informing her that all inquiries regarding service of process 

should be directed to the U.S. Marshals service. Appellees have 

moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The order Hall seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we grant Appellees’ motion and dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-25 Preliminary matters. ( a ) Within 30 days after receipt of notice of the initiation of the action, as described above, the party, or counsel for the party, may request a hearing, provide any written evidence and arguments in lieu of a hearing, or pay the amount specified in the notice as being appropriate. A hearing must be requested in writing; the request must specify the issues which are in dispute. Failure to specify a nonjurisdictional issue will preclude its consideration.
( b ) The right to a hearing is waived if the party does not submit the request to the Hearing Officer within 30 days after receiving notice of the alleged violation. At the discretion of the Hearing Officer, a hearing may be granted if the party submits a late request.
( c ) The Hearing Officer must promptly schedule all hearings which are requested. The Hearing Officer shall grant any delays or continuances which may be necessary or desirable in the interest of fairly resolving the case.
( d ) A party who has requested a hearing may amend the specification of the issues in dispute at any time up to 10 days before the scheduled date of the hearing. Issues raised later than 10 days before the scheduled hearing may be presented only at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.
[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by CGD 85-001A, 51 FR 19329, May 29, 1986]