alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60359

Conference Calendar

 

DARIES F. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LEE HOLCOMB; RICHIE MARTIN, Chief,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95-CV-113-CR

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mississippi prisoner Daries Mitchell, No. 46938-A, appeals

the district court’s denial of his FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) motion

challenging the dismissal of Mitchell’s “Motion to Remove” a

state-court suit filed by Mitchell and then pending on appeal

before the Mississippi Supreme Court. Having reviewed the

record, we hold that the appeal from the district court’s

dismissal of the motion is frivolous. See Mitchell v. Holcomb,
No. 96-60359

- 2 -

No. 1:95-cv113GR (S.D. Ms. Oct. 13, 1995).

We warn Mitchell that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. 

To avoid sanctions Mitchell is further cautioned to review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that

are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 435 

Recognizing the goals of Catholic Schools Week and honoring the valuable 

contributions of Catholic schools in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Ms. LANDRIEU) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the goals of Catholic Schools Week and honoring 

the valuable contributions of Catholic schools in the 

United States. 

Whereas Catholic schools in the United States have received 

international acclaim for academic excellence while providing students with lessons that extend far beyond the 

classroom; 

Whereas Catholic schools present a broad curriculum that 

emphasizes the lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values in the young people of 

the United States; 

Whereas Catholic schools in the United States today educate 

2,363,220 students and maintain a student-to-teacher 

ratio of 15 to 1; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 435 ATS 

Whereas the faculty members of Catholic schools teach a 

highly diverse body of students; 

Whereas the graduation rate for all Catholic school students 

is 95 percent; 

Whereas 83 percent of Catholic high school graduates go on 

to college; 

Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated 

to their faith, values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually stimulating environment rich in 

spiritual character and moral development; and 

Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic 

education, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops 

stated, ‘‘Education is one of the most important ways by 

which the Church fulfills its commitment to the dignity 

of the person and building of community. Community is 

central to education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently desired goal. The educational efforts 

of the Church, therefore, must be directed to forming 

persons-in-community; for the education of the individual 

Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, 

but also the destinies of the many communities in which 

he lives.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the goals of Catholic Schools 

3 Week, an event cosponsored by the National Catho4 lic Educational Association and the United States 

5 Conference of Catholic Bishops that recognizes the 

6 vital contributions of thousands of Catholic elemen7 tary and secondary schools in the United States; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 435 ATS 

1 (2) commends Catholic schools, students, par2 ents, and teachers across the United States for their 

3 ongoing contributions to education, and for the vital 

4 role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, 

5 stronger future for the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, or authorized representative.
( b ) *Associate Solicitor* means the Associate Solicitor for Fair Labor Standards, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.
( c ) *Chief Administrative Law Judge* means the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, 800 K Street, NW., Suite 400, Washington DC 20001-8002.
( d ) *Respondent* means the contractor, subcontractor, person alleged to be responsible under the contract or subcontract, and/or any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which such person or firm is alleged to have a substantial interest (or interest, if the proceeding is under the Davis-Bacon Act) against whom the proceedings are brought.
[49 FR 10627, Mar. 21, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 54708, Oct. 22, 1991; 82 FR 2226, Jan. 9, 2017]
§ 104.260 Security systems and equipment maintenance. ( a ) Security systems and equipment must be in good working order and inspected, tested, calibrated and maintained according to the manufacturer's recommendation.
( b ) The results of testing completed under paragraph (a) of this section must be recorded in accordance with § 104.235. Any deficiencies must be promptly corrected.
( c ) The Vessel Security Plan (VSP) must include procedures for identifying and responding to security system and equipment failures or malfunctions.
[USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39302, July 1, 2003, as amended by USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57710, Aug. 23, 2016]
Exhibit
10.32


December
11, 2008








B. M.
Rankin, Jr.


300
Crescent Court, Suite 875


Dallas,
Texas  75201





Dear Mr.
Rankin:





The
purpose of this letter is to confirm the automatic renewal of your Consulting
Agreement dated January 1, 1991, as amended (the “Agreement”).





Your
contract will automatically renew for an additional one-year period beginning
January 1, 2009, and ending December 31, 2009.  All other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.





Please
confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding with respect
to this matter by signing both originals of this letter and returning one to
me.





Very
truly yours,








/s/ Richard C. Adkerson


Richard C. Adkerson


Chairman of the Board


FM Services Company











AGREED
TO AND ACCEPTED








BY:     /s/ B. M. Rankin,
Jr.                        1/2/2009


B. M. Rankin,
Jr.                            Date
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.664 Rainy River, Rainy Lake and their tributaries.

The draw of the Canadian National Railroad Bridge, mile 85.0, at Ranier, MN may operate remotely, and shall open on signal; except that, from October 16 to April 30, the draw shall open on signal if at least 12-hours advance notice is provided. The commercial phone number to provide advance notice shall be posted on the bridge so that it is plainly visible to vessel operators approaching the up or downstream side of the bridge. The owners of the bridge shall provide and keep in good legible condition two board gauges painted white with black figures to indicate the vertical clearance under the closed draw at all water levels. The gauges shall be so placed on the bridge that they are plainly visible to operators of vessels approaching the bridge either up or downstream. The bridge shall operate and maintain a VHF-FM Marine Radio.

[USCG-2020-0033, 86 FR 53218, Sept. 27, 2021, as amended by USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10029, Feb. 16, 2023]
Served: May 14, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 14th day of May, 2014

 Essential Air Service at

ALTOONA, PENNSYLVANIA

BRADFORD, PENNSYLVANIA

DUBOIS, PENNSYLVANIA

FRANKLIN/OIL CITY, PENNSYLVANIA

JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA

JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK

STAUNTON, VIRGINIA

BECKLEY, WEST VIRGINIA

CLARKSBURG/FAIRMONT,WEST VIRGINIA

GREENBRIER/WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS,

 WEST VIRGINIA

MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA

PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA/

 MARIETTA, OHIO

Under 49 U.S. C. § 47131 et seq.

DOT-OST-2002-11446 

DOT-OST-2003-14528

DOT-OST-2004-17617

DOT-OST-1997-2523

DOT-OST-2002-11451

DOT-OST-2003-14950

DOT-OST-2002-11378

DOT-OST-1997-2761

DOT-OST-2005-20736

DOT-OST-2003-15553

DOT-OST-2005-20735

DOT-OST-2005-20734 

NOTICE

The Department has received requests from two air carriers asking that they be allowed to 

modify their proposals at some or all of the above-mentioned communities. We have reviewed 

the requests and find that it is in the public interest to grant this request. Therefore, the air 

carriers that submitted proposals in response to the most recent Request for Proposals at the 

above-mentioned communities will now have until May 27, 2014 to resubmit a revised proposal, 

if they wish do so. 

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available online at

www.regulations.gov

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20075 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO CRUZ, also known as Harold Antonio Esprilla, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-352

-------------------- February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Harold Antonio Esprilla, a.k.a. Antonio Cruz has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Esprilla received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief reveals no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
4. B. Certificate of Rulemaking File.
- Search
          - Login
          - 

            - **
            - **
            - **
            - **
            - **

# The DHS Program

USAID

-  Countries    - Countries List
  - Interactive Map 
-  Data    - Using Datasets for Analysis
  - Guide to DHS Statistics
  - Download Datasets
  - IPUMS-DHS
  - DHS User Forum
  - STATcompiler
  - Mobile App
  - DHS API
  - Visualizations 
-  Publications    - Publications Search
  - Journal Articles Search
  - Publications Catalog 
-  Methodology    - Survey Types
  - Survey Characteristics Search
  - Questionnaires and Manuals
  - Tabulation Plan for DHS Final Report
  - Tabulation Plan for Key Indicators Report
  - Survey Process
  - Survey Questions Database
  - GIS
  - Dissemination
  - Capacity Strengthening 
-  Research    - Featured Studies
  - DHS Fellows Program 
-  Topics    - Childhood Mortality
  - COVID-19
  - Family Planning
  - Gender
  - Malaria
  - Maternal Mortality
  - Nutrition
  - SDGs
  - Wealth Index
  - More topics 

LOGIN
            - **
            - **
            - **
            - **
            - **

The DHS ProgramPublications

                    - PUBLICATIONS
                    Publications Search
By Type
By Country
By Topic
Recommended Citations

                    - JOURNAL ARTICLES
                    Journal Articles Search
By Journal
By Country
By Topic

                    - ORDER PUBLICATIONS
                    How to Order/Download
Shopping Cart

## Publications Catalog

a>	**Publication results for:***Country(s):* "Pakistan" **AND***Publication Type:* "Final Reports" **AND***Publication Subtype:* "DHS Final Reports"
**4** Publication(s) 
FINAL REPORTS - DHS Final ReportsIDTitlePublishedPublication SubTypeIn PrintFR354Pakistan DHS, 2017-18 - Final Report (English)01/2019DHS Final ReportsYesFR290Pakistan DHS, 2012-13 - Final Report (English)12/2013DHS Final ReportsYesFR200Pakistan DHS, 2006-07 - Final Report (English)06/2008DHS Final ReportsYesFR29Pakistan DHS, 1990-91 - Final Report (English)07/1992DHS Final ReportsNo WHO WE ARE -  Leadership 
-  News Room 
-  Contact Us 
-  Employment 
-  Privacy Policy 
 Countries -  Countries List 
-  Interactive Map 
 Methodology -  Survey Types 
-  Survey Characteristics Search 
-  Questionnaires 
-  Survey Process 
-  Privacy of Respondents 
-  GIS 
-  Dissemination 
-  Capacity Strengthening 
 RESEARCH -  Contraceptive Profiles 
-  DHS Fellows Program 
 DATA -  Using Datasets for Analysis 
-  Guide to DHS Statistics 
-  Download Datasets 
-  Dataset Login 
-  IPUMS-DHS 
-  DHS User Forum 
-  STATcompiler 
-  Mobile App 
-  DHS API 
-  Visualizations 
 PUBLICATIONS -  Publications Search 
-  Journal Articles Search 
-  Publications Catalog 
 TOPICS -  Childhood Mortality 
-  COVID-19 
-  Family Planning 
-  Gender 
-  Malaria 
-  Maternal Mortality 
-  Nutrition 
-  Wealth Index 
-  SDGs 
-  More Topics 

ICF, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850Tel: +1 301 407-6500 * Fax: +1 301 407-6501

The information provided on this Web site is not official U.S. Government information and does not represent the views or positions of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. Government.
Title VII - Allotments for Vulnerable Elder Rights Protection Activities

FY 2018 Final Allocation

9/13/2018

State Ombudsman Elder Abuse Total Title VII

Alabama $255,700 $76,215 $331,915

Alaska $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Arizona $370,494 $84,438 $454,932

Arkansas $156,380 $48,157 $204,537

California $1,762,601 $471,073 $2,233,674

Colorado $251,645 $57,332 $308,977

Connecticut $189,583 $59,907 $249,490

Delaware $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

District of Columbia $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Florida $1,265,873 $344,252 $1,610,125

Georgia $451,368 $103,321 $554,689

Hawaii $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Idaho $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Illinois $619,063 $197,384 $816,447

Indiana $327,693 $98,224 $425,917

Iowa $167,071 $55,927 $222,998

Kansas $143,756 $45,843 $189,599

Kentucky $227,450 $66,595 $294,045

Louisiana $224,795 $68,518 $293,313

Maine $84,160 $23,710 $107,870

Maryland $290,505 $78,087 $368,592

Massachusetts $351,399 $109,606 $461,005

Michigan $532,609 $160,862 $693,471

Minnesota $275,472 $76,347 $351,819

Mississippi $147,938 $45,198 $193,136

Missouri $318,804 $97,643 $416,447

Montana $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Nebraska $93,961 $29,770 $123,731

Nevada $144,032 $32,814 $176,846

New Hampshire $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

New Jersey $449,577 $143,950 $593,527

New Mexico $109,194 $26,393 $135,587

New York $990,044 $318,066 $1,308,110

North Carolina $512,511 $126,782 $639,293

North Dakota $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Ohio $619,864 $197,185 $817,049

Oklahoma $192,358 $60,208 $252,566

Oregon $225,541 $56,795 $282,336

Pennsylvania $721,646 $242,944 $964,590

Rhode Island $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

South Carolina $269,393 $63,080 $332,473

South Dakota $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Tennessee $342,040 $91,810 $433,850

Texas $1,121,873 $274,281 $1,396,154

Utah $106,998 $24,837 $131,835

Vermont $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

Virginia $405,417 $102,820 $508,237

Washington $359,864 $86,291 $446,155

West Virginia $111,138 $36,736 $147,874

Wisconsin $306,289 $90,309 $396,598

Wyoming $84,052 $23,710 $107,762

American Samoa $10,506 $2,964 $13,470

Guam $42,026 $11,855 $53,881

Northern Mariana Islands $10,506 $2,964 $13,470

Puerto Rico $200,571 $54,217 $254,788

Virgin Islands $42,026 $11,855 $53,881

TOTAL $16,810,358 $4,742,085 $21,552,443
----

----

----

----

----

|   | If to the Participant: |
|--------|------------------------|

|   | If to the Company: |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | LGL Group, Inc. |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | 2525 Shader Road |
|--------|------------------|

|   | Orlando, FL 32804 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Attention:  Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

|   | THE LGL GROUP, INC. |
|--------|---------------------|
|   |                |
|   |                |
|   | By:                 |   |
|   |                | Name: |   |
|   |                | Title: |   |
National City
Mortgage

March 14,2000

National City Mortgage Co.
3232 Newmark Drive *  Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Telephone (937) 910-1200

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1820
Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE:    Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year.

(A)      I have reviewed the activities and  performance of the Servicer  during
         the preceding  fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
         Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer
         Guide and to the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has
         fulfilled all of its duties responsibilities or obligations under these
         Agreements  throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or
         failure of the servicer to perform any of such duties, responsibilities
         or obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature
         and status thereof has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;
(B)      I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or
         FHLMC servicer in good standing;
(C)      I have  confirmed  that the  Fidelity  Bond,  the Errors and  Omissions
         Insurance  Policy and any other bonds  required  under the terms of the
         Servicing Agreement,  Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement
         and/or Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;
(D)      All premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy
         (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage  Insurance Policy (if applicable),
         with respect to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid and that all
         such insurance policies are in full force and effect;
(E)      All real estate taxes,  governmental assessments and any other expenses
         accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance
         on any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been  paid,  or if any such costs or
         expenses have not been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the
         reason for the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota,
         N.A.;
(F)      All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded;and
(G)      All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgage Property
         required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue
         Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Officer

Vice President
Title

March 14, 2000
Date
#### § 110.196 Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine Pass, Tex.

(a) *The anchorage area.* The water bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 29°43′59.0′′ N | 93°52′08.1′′ W |
| 29°44′06.8′′ N | 93°51′57.6′′ W |
| 29°43′53.0′′ N | 93°51′47.1′′ W |
| 29°43′36.7′′ N | 93°51′50.9′′ W |

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) The anchorage area is for the temporary use of vessels of all types, but especially for naval and merchant vessels awaiting weather and tidal conditions favorable to the resumption of their voyages.

(2) Except when stress of weather or adverse tides or currents make sailing impractical or hazardous, vessels shall not anchor in the anchorage area for periods exceeding 48 hours unless expressly authorized by the Captain of the Port to anchor for longer periods.

(3) Vessels shall not anchor so as to obstruct the passage of other vessels proceeding to or from available anchorage spaces.

(4) Anchors shall not be placed channelward from the anchorage area, and no portion of the hull or rigging of any anchored vessel shall extend channelward from the limits of the anchorage area.

(5) Vessels using spuds for anchors shall anchor as close to shore as practicable having due regard for the provisions in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.

(6) Fixed moorings, piles or stakes, and floats or buoys for marking anchorages or moorings in place are prohibited.

(7) Whenever the maritime or commercial interests of the United States so require, the Captain of the Port is hereby empowered to shift the position of any vessel anchored or moored within or outside of the anchorage area including any vessel which is moored or anchored so as to obstruct navigation or interfere with range lights.

[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by CGD08-06-26, 72 FR 464, Jan. 5, 2007; USCG-2018-0388, 84 FR 9459, Mar. 15, 2019]