alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Hydrology of Cornfield Wash, Sandoval County, New Mexico, 1951-55

By: F.W. KennonHarold V. Peterson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1475B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Temira Haywood

Appellate case number: 01-21-00645-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-00560A

Trial court: 308th District Court of Harris County

Relator, Temira Haywood, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. The Court 

requests a response to the petition from the real party in interest, Rodolfo Hernandez. The 

response, if any, is due to be filed with this Court no later than twenty days of the date 

of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ April Farris__________

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 9, 2021______
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.824 Neuse River.

The draw of the Atlantic and East Carolina Railway Bridge, mile 80.0, at Kinston shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.

[USCG-2011-0974, 76 FR 72311, Nov. 23, 2011]
#### WIDEN v WIDEN (2 cases)

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

Nos 2213 & 2219.

Decided July 8, 1929

Percy R. Taylor, and Charles K. & Stanley M. Friedman, all of Toledo, for plaintiff.

Ralph Emery, Toledo, for defendants.

*447RICHARDS, J.

The plaintiff now seeks the recovery of the balance of the money not expended for his benefit which he delivered to Bessie Widen and the cancellation of the deed and return of the property to him. By reason of the conduct of the defendants, the plaintiff has been taking his meals at another place, although he still occupies a room in the apartment conveyed to the son. The evidence leaves no room for doubt of the utter failure to care for him and provide him with a comfortable home and maintenance, and the animosity displayed toward him almost immediately after the transaction unmistakably points to the fact that they contemplated securing his property without complying with the contract to care for him and provide him with maintenance and support during his life. The evidence shows that the contract, made as it was while he was depressed immediately after the death of his wife, and while he was sick, suffering and enfeebled, was attended with fraud and the transfer and conveyance should be set aside.

It is urged in defense that the deed itself contains no forfeiture clause for failure to comply with its terms, and that therefore plaintiff’s only remedy is to recover damages for the breach, and to sustain that contention counsel cite City of Cleveland vs. Huron, 102 Ohio St., 218. We have no doubt of the correctness of that decision as applied to the facts before the court, but cannot extend the principles to a case of this character. That case did not involve an improvident contract made by an enfeebled man for his care and support and the contract in that case was made without any undue advantage or suggestion of fraud on the part of any one. As said in B. & O. R. R. Co. vs. Baillie, 112 Ohio St., 567, the syllabus must be interpreted in view of the facts found in the case. The case at bar is more like that of Tracey vs. Sackett, 1 Ohio St., 55 and Reid vs. Burns, 13 Ohio St., 49. See also Glocke vs. Glocke, 113 Wis., 303.

We think the plaintiff is entitled to the equitable relief sought and a decree will be entered in his favor in each case.

Williams and Lloyd, JJ, concur.
#### § 110.86 Sodus Bay, NY.

The water area in Sodus Bay, New York, south of Sand Point, two separate sections, enclosed by:

(a) Eastern Section, beginning at a point on the shoreline at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 43°15′58.1′′ N | 076°58′34.0′′ W, to |
| 43°15′51.9′′ N | 076°58′33.5′′ W, to |
| 43°15′53.5′′ N | 076°58′47.5′′ W, to |
| 43°16′01.8′′ N | 076°58′43.0′′ W, |
| thence along the natural shoreline and structures to: | |
| 43°15′58.1′′ N | 076°58′34.0′′ W. |

(b) Western Section, beginning at a point on the shoreline at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 43°16′02.5′′ N | 076°58′45.0′′ W, to |
| 43°15′54.0′′ N | 076°58′50.0′′ W, to |
| 43°15′54.8′′ N | 076°59′00.1′′ W, to |
| 43°16′07.0′′ N | 076°59′47.0′′ W, |
| thence along the natural shoreline and structures to: | |
| 43°16′02.5′′ N | 076°58′45.0′′ W. |

[CGD 09-93-029, [58 FR 40740](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/58-FR-40740), July 30, 1993]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Alexanders, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. April 28, 2005
    /s/ Joseph MacnowName:
    Joseph MacnowTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2015

No. 04-15-00575-CV

B&P DEVELOPMENT, LLC and Chad H. Foster Jr.,

Appellants

v.

KNIGHTHAWK, LLC, Series G,

Appellees

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29842

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 After we granted the court reporter’s first request for an extension of time to file the 

record, the record was due November 23, 2015. The court reporter has now filed a second 

motion for extension of time. The reporter asks for an additional thirty days of time to file the 

record from the date the extension was filed, i.e., December 1, 2015. The reporter’s request for 

an extension of time is GRANTED IN PART. We ORDER the court reporter to file the record 

in this court on or before December 23, 2015, which is thirty days from the last due date. See

Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c).

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |                  |                          |
|--------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                     |                  |                          |   |
| Date: June      27, 2008 |        By:  |  /s/ Mike      Hetherman |   |
|                     |  Name:           | Mike      Hetherman           |   |
|                     |  Title:          | CEO and      Director         |   |
|                     |                  |                          |   |
#### John Peach *vs.*Filippo Bruno & another.

Suffolk.

December 1, 1915.

June 21, 1916.

Present: Pugg, C. J., Losing, De Courcy, Crosby, & Carroll, JJ.

*Agency,*Existence of relation.

Where the owner of a horse and wagon lets them with a driver to carry merchandise from place to place as directed by a servant of the hirer who accompanies the driver for that sole purpose, the driver as matter of law is the servant of the owner of the horse and wagon and not the servant of the hirer.

Tort for damage to the plaintiff’s horse, which caused its death, from being run into by a horse of the defendant that was running away owing to the alleged negligence of its driver, who was alleged to have been the agent and servant of the defendant. Writ in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston dated December 5, 1913.

At the trial in the Municipal Court the judge found among others the following facts: “The defendant hired of one Cohen a team consisting of a horse, harness, wagon and driver to assist him in the transportation of certain goods, wares and merchandise. The horse was at all times under the control of the driver furnished by Cohen and was under his guidance and direction at the time of the accident. The defendant’s servant and agent was with the team at the time of the accident but simply directing the driver where to obtain the merchandise and where to deliver it. He had nothing whatever to do with driving the horse.”

On the facts found by him the judge ruled that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant.

At the request of the plaintiff the judge reported the case to the Appellate Division, who ordered that the report be dismissed, and the plaintiff appealed.

The case was submitted on briefs.

*E. C. Jenney,*for the plaintiff.

*T. T. Zóttoli,*for the defendant Bruno.

Loring, J.

This appeal is wholly without merit. Where (as in the case at bar) the defendant hires from another person a horse, wagon and driver to carry merchandise from place to place as di*448rected by the defendant’s servant who accompanies the driver for that purpose alone, and nothing more appears, as matter of law the driver is the servant of the owner of the horse and wagon and not of the defendant. Nothing is better settled. The cases are collected in *Shepard*v. *Jacobs,*204 Mass. 110.

The cases relied on by the plaintiff *(Boomer*v. *Wilbur,*176 Mass. 482, *Woodman*v. *Metropolitan Railroad,*149 Mass. 335, and *Thompson*v. *Lowell, Lawrence & Haverhill Street Railway,*170 Mass. 577) have nothing to do with this case.

*Order affirmed.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Justice.gov 
-  National Security Division 
-  NSD FOIA Library 

# NSD FOIA Library

                      -  Facebook 
                      -  X 
                      -  LinkedIn 
                      -  Email 

## **FOIA Processed Documents** (Definition)

                      -  **Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)**                          -  FISA Documents   
                      -  **Congressional Testimony and Related Documents**                          -  Statement of Kenneth L. Wainstein, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, Department of Justice, Before the Select Committee on Intelligence, United States Senate, Concerning the Need to Bring the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act into the Modern Era, Presented May 1, 2007 (PDF) 
                        -  FISA Modernization Provisions of the Proposed Fiscal Year 2008 Intelligence Authorization (PDF)  
                      -  **Other Releases of Documents in the Public Interest**                          - Response to the Court's Order Dated December 17, 2019  (PDF)         
                      -  **Foreign Agent Registration Materials**                          -  The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) Unit administers the FARA and maintains a public office to make all registration materials available to the public.   
                      -  **Chemical Hazard Information** 

 

## Operational Documents (Definition)

(The NSD does not maintain such records at this time.)
                      - Policy Statements
                      - Staff Manuals and Instructions
                      - Final Opinions and Orders

 

## Proactive Disclosures (Definition)

                      -  NSD Historical Documents 

 

## Argentina Declassification Project

                      - Argentine Commission for Human Rights, June 24, 1977
                      - Foreign Agents Registration Act - Argentina, December 23, 1977
                      - Foreign Agents Registration Act - Argentina, April 14, 1978
                      - Foreign Agents Registration Act - Argentina, October 17, 1978
                      - Foreign Agents Registration Act - Argentina, March 24, 1981

Portable Document Format (PDF) files may be viewed with a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
### Ground water in the Wupatki and Sunset Crater National Monuments, Coconino County, Arizona

By: Oliver J. Cosner

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1475J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Ground water in the Wupatki and Sunset Crater National Monuments, Coconino County, Arizona(1955)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 356 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 356

Affirming that any offensive military action taken against Iran must be 
  explicitly approved by Congress before such action may be initiated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 25, 2007

   Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Sanders) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Affirming that any offensive military action taken against Iran must be 
  explicitly approved by Congress before such action may be initiated.

Whereas article I, section 8, of the Constitution of the United States vests in 
        Congress all power to declare war: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That any offensive military action taken by the United 
States against Iran must be explicitly approved by Congress before such 
action may be initiated.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

** **

|             |   |   |
|------------------|--------|--------|
| November 1, 2010 |   |   | /s/ Steven Roth |
|             |   | Name:  | Steven Roth |
|             |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |        |        |  |  |

 

 

----
§ 870.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth the procedures and any policies, determinations, and interpretations of general application whereby the Secretary of Labor carries out his duties under section 303 of the CCPA dealing with restrictions on garnishment of earnings, and section 305 permitting exemptions for State-regulated garnishments in certain situations. While the Secretary's duties under section 303 include insuring that certain amounts of earnings are protected, such duties do not include establishing priorities among multiple garnishments, as such priorities are determined by other Federal statutes or by State law.
( b ) Functions of the Secretary under the CCPA to be performed as provided in this part are assigned to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division (hereinafter referred to as the Administrator), who, under the general direction and control of the Assistant Secretary, Wage and Labor Standards Administration, shall be empowered to take final and binding actions in administering the provisions of this part. The Administrator is empowered to subdelegate any of his duties under this part. Any legal advice and assistance required for administration of this part shall be provided by the Solicitor of Labor.
[35 FR 8226, May 26, 1970, as amended at 44 FR 30684, May 29, 1979]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.785 Genesee River.

The draw of the Colonel Patrick Henry O'Rorke Memorial Bridge, mile 1.2 at Rochester, shall open on signal from April 1 through December 15; however, from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need be opened only for the passage of commercial vessels. From 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 11 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays, the draw need be opened only on the hour and half-hour, except that commercial vessels shall be passed at any time. From December 16 through March 31, the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given. The owners of the bridge shall maintain clearance gauges in accordance with 33 CFR 118.160.

[USCG-2013-0921, 78 FR 72025, Dec. 2, 2013]
§ 95.71 Closeout procedures. ( a ) Recipients shall submit, within 90 calendar days after the date of completion of the award, all financial, performance, and other reports as required by the terms and conditions of the award. DOL may approve extensions when requested by the recipient.
( b ) Unless DOL authorizes an extension, a recipient shall liquidate all obligations and/or accrued expenditures incurred under the award not later than 90 calendar days after the funding period or the date of completion as specified in the terms and conditions of the award or in agency implementing instructions.
( c ) DOL shall make prompt payments to a recipient for allowable reimbursable costs under the award being closed out.
( d ) The recipient shall promptly refund any balances of unobligated cash that DOL has advanced or paid and that is not authorized to be retained by the recipient for use in other projects. OMB Circular A-129 governs unreturned amounts that become delinquent debts.
( e ) When authorized by the terms and conditions of the award, DOL shall make a settlement for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs after closeout reports are received.
( f ) The recipient shall account for any real and personal property acquired with Federal funds or received from the Federal Government in accordance with §§ 95.31 through 95.37.
( g ) In the event a final audit has not been performed prior to the closeout of an award, DOL retains the right to recover an appropriate amount after fully considering the recommendations on disallowed costs resulting from the final audit.
[59 FR 38271, July 27, 1994, as amended at 72 FR 37104, July 9, 2007]
Memorandum: “U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Analysis of Refrigerants and 

Environmental Risk Factors”

Date: March 29, 2010

This table compares various refrigerants and in particular, some of the environmental risk factors 

considered by the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. These factors include:

 ozone depletion potential (ODP);

 global warming potential (GWP); 

 flammability;

 toxicity;

 contributions to smog;

 aquatic and ecosystem effects; and, 

 occupational health and safety.

Refrigerant Comparison Table

Refrigerant Ozone 

Depleting 

Potential 

(ODP) from 40 

CFR Part 82 

Appendix A & B

Global Warming 

Potential (GWP) AR4 

and SAR

Atmospheric 

Lifetime (ALT) from 

AR4 expect where notated

Volatile 

Organic 

Compound 

(VOC)

R-600a 0 8

a

<1weekb Yes

R-290 0 ~3 (AR4) <1weekc Yes

HCR-188C 0 <5 d <1week c Yes

HCR-188C1 0 <5 d <1week c Yes

CFC-11 1.0 4,750 (AR4) 3,800 (SAR) 45yrs No

CFC-12 1.0 10,900(AR4) 8,100 (SAR) 100yrs No

CFC-13 1.0 14,400 (AR4)

Not listed (SAR)

640yrs No

HCFC-22 0.055 1,810 (AR4) 1,500 (SAR) 12yrs No

HCFC-142b 0.065 2,300 (AR4) 1,800 (SAR) 17.9yrs No

HFC-134a 0 1,430 (AR4) 1,300 (SAR) 14yrs No

R-404A (Blend 

of 44% HFC-125, 

4% HFC-134a, 

52% HFC-143a)

0 3,900 (AR4)

3,300 (SAR)

components range from 

14-42 yrs 

No

R-410A (Blend 

of 50% HFC-32, 

50% HFC-125)

0 2,100 (AR4)

1,700 (SAR)

components range from 

4.9-29 yrs 

No

a SNAP submission, General Electric

b ICF GE risk screen – Calm and Hourahan (2007) indicate the ALT is 0.019years or about one week

c ICF GE risk screen – Wuebbles (2003) indicate the ALT of 5- 21days or about one week

d HCR-188C SNAP Submission (A.S. Trust & Holdings, Inc. 2007).f SNAP submission, General Electric