alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 12778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee (235) Non-Rechargeable 
Lithium Batteries

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Third RTCA Special Committee 235 Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Third RTCA Special Committee 235 meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 26-27, 2016 from 8:30 a.m.-5:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Radiant Power Corporation, 7135 
16th Street East, Suite 101, Sarasota, FL 34243, Tel: (202) 330-0680.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or 
Karan Hofmann, Program Director, RTCA, Inc., khofmann@rtca.org, (202) 
330-0680.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 235. The agenda 
will include the following:

Tuesday, April 26, 2016 (8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m.)

1. Welcome and Administrative Remarks
2. Introductions
3. Agenda Review
4. Meeting--Minutes Review
5. Update of PMC Approval TOR Revision
6. Status Report of Working-Group Leaders and key items to be brought 
to Plenary for discussion
    a. WG-1/3
    i. Template
    ii. Section 1
    iii. Section 2--Requirements
    b. WG-2
    i. Section 2--Tests and Compliance Matrix
7. Review of program schedule
8. Action Item Review
9. Any other Business
10. Date and Place of Next Meeting
11. Adjourn

Wednesday, April 27, 2016 (8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.)

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be 
provided upon request. Persons who wish to present statements or obtain 
information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 3, 2016.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, NextGen, Enterprise Support Services 
Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-05311 Filed 3-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the
“Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nancy D. Parmelee, as
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 24, 2008














/s/
Nancy D. Parmelee


Nancy D. Parmelee


Senior Vice President,


Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

d0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

146702

WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD, LLP,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146702

COA: 312779

Wayne CC: 09

- 014899

- CK

RDD INVESTMENT CORPORATION,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, ROMULUS

DEEP DISPOSAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

REMUS JOINT VENTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL

DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC., RONALD ZAJAC,

P.C., and F. LOGAN DAVIDSON,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 794.101 Intended scope of exemption.

Under section 7(b)(3) of the Act, the intent of the exemption must be given effect in determining the scope of its application to an enterprise and to the employees of an enterprise. The statutory language must be applied to the facts in a manner consistent with the purpose of the exemption as evidenced by its legislative history. This purpose is to relieve the described enterprises from the application of the Act's general overtime pay requirements (in the limited manner specified in the exemption) to employment in their activities of distributing petroleum products. Such employment was stated to be affected by climatic, seasonal, and other pertinent factors characteristic of business operations in the distribution of such products. (See, in this connection, the following documents of 87th Cong., first sess.; H. Rept. No. 75, pp. 26, 27, 36; 105 Congressional Record (daily edition) p. 4519; S. Rept. No. 145, pp. 37, 50; H. Rept. No. 327, p. 18; Hearings before Senate Subcommittee on Labor on S. 256, S. 879, and S. 895, at pp. 411-424; Hearings before House Special Subcommittee on Labor on H.R. 2935, at pp. 422-425 and 627-629; and these documents of the 89th Cong., second sess.; H. Rept. No. 1366, pp. 12, 13, and 43; Cong. Record (daily edition) p. 10745; S. Rept. No. 1487, pp. 32 and 51.)
EXHIBIT 12.1  MGE Energy, Inc. Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2007 (In thousands)  EarningsNet Income$48,825Equity earnings(6,286)Income distribution from equity investees4,441Federal and state income taxes27,855Amortization of capitalized interest102Interest capitalized(3,949)Fixed charges18,827Total Earnings as Defined$89,815Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$12,513Interest on rentals*1,004AFUDC borrowed funds818Capitalized interest3,949Amortization of debt issuance costs543Total Fixed Charges$18,827Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges4.77x   *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
#### § 793.1 Reliance upon interpretations.

The interpretations of the law contained in this part are official interpretations which may be relied upon as provided in section 10 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947. All prior opinions, rulings and interpretations which are inconsistent with the interpretations in this bulletin are rescinded and withdrawn.
(77 South. 937)

#### SCOTT v. STATE.

(1 Div. 264.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1918.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1918.)

1. Criminal Law &wkey;>1092(8) — Appeal—Bill of Exceptions — Delay in Filing.

Under Gen. Acts 1915', p. 816, providing that appellant’s bill of exceptions, may in the absence of the trial judge from the county, be filed with the clerk within 90 days from entry of judgment, a bill, so filed after 91 days had expired since such entry, will be stricken.

2. Criminal Law &wkey;>1094 — Appeal — Dismissal-Affirmance .

Where bill of exceptions in a criminal case has been stricken because not presented within tlie time required by law and no reversible error appears in the record proper, a judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County; Ben D. Turner, Judge.

Eddie Scott was convicted of assault with a weapon, and- he appeals.

Affirmed.

Granade *&*Granade, of Chatom, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, T.

The defendant was convicted by a, jury of the offense of assault with a weapon, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals.

[1] On submission in this court, mqtion is made by the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions, “for that the said bill of exceptions was not presented to the trial judge within the time required by law.” The record shows that the defendant was tried, convicted, and sentenced -on October 23, 1916. The bill of exceptions was filed with the trial judge on January 26, 1917, or 9G days after the entry of the judgment. It appears that the trial judge was absent from the county, and for this reason the defendant filed his bill of exceptions with the clerk on January 22, 1917. General Acts 1915, p. 816, provide that in the event the trial judge is absent from the county in which the cause is tried and unable to accept presentation *344of the bill, the defendant may Hie his bill of exceptions with the clerk, provided he does so within 90 days from the date of the entry of the judgment in the cause. The judgment in this case having been entered on the 23d day of October, 1916, and the bill of exceptions being filed with the clerk on January 22, 1917, and with the trial judge on January 26, 1917, it appears that by excluding the first day and including the last, as the law required, 91 days had expired before the bill was filed with the clerk and 96 days before it was presented to the trial judge. The motion to strike the bill of exceptions upon the grounds stated must therefore be granted, and the bill of exceptions isi stricken.

[2] No error of a reversible nature appears in the record proper, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 249 

Honoring the life of Ruth Bell Graham. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2007 

Mrs. DOLE (for herself, Mr. BURR, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. MCCONNELL) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Ruth Bell Graham. 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham was born on June 10, 1920 in 

Qingjiang, China, the daughter of Presbyterian medical 

missionaries; 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham returned to the United States to 

attend Wheaton College, where she met and fell in love 

with her future husband, Billy Graham, who would become one of the most acclaimed evangelists in the world; 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham married Billy Graham on August 

13, 1943 at Montreat Presbyterian Church in her beloved 

Western North Carolina; 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham was the devoted mother of five 

children (Virginia, Anne, Ruth, Franklin, and Nelson 

Edman) and the grandmother of 19 grandchildren; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 249 ATS 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham was a renowned author and poet 

who penned 14 books that have moved and inspired people around the globe; 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham and Billy Graham were recognized with the Congressional Gold Medal in 1996 for 

their ‘‘outstanding and lasting contributions to morality, 

racial equality, family, philanthropy, and religion’’; and 

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham touched countless lives worldwide 

by sharing her tremendous faith, her deep compassion for 

the less fortunate, her great talents and her lighthearted 

wit: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life, work, and 

2 legacy of Ruth Bell Graham, a loyal companion who 

3 shined with grace and courage beside her husband Billy 

4 Graham, and a dedicated mother who fostered individ5 uality and humility in her five children. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
§ 780.913 Nonexempt preparation. ( a ) *Retail packing.* Since the exemption, as expressly stated in section 13(b)(16), includes the transportation of the fruits or vegetables only to places of first marketing or first processing, packing or preparing for retail or further distribution beyond the place of first processing or first marketing is not exempt as “preparation for transportation.” (*Schultz* v. *Durrence* (D. Ga.), 19 WH Cases 747, 63 CCH Lab. Cas. secs. 32, 387.)
( b ) *Preparation for market.* No exemption is provided under section 13(b)(16) for operations performed on the farm in preparation for market (such as ripening, cleaning, grading, or sorting) rather than in preparation for the transportation described in the section. Exemption, if any, for these activities should be considered under sections 13(a)(6) and 13(b)(12). (See subparts D and E of this part 780.)
( c ) *Processing or canning.* Processing is not exempt preparation for transportation. Thus, the canning of fruits or vegetables is not under section 13(b)(16).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARSHALL
INDUSTRIES ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  224,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,089)
<INVENTORY>                                    340,476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               584,439
<PP&E>                                         100,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                (61,691)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 772,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,616
<OTHER-SE>                                     393,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   772,528
<SALES>                                      1,722,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,722,646
<CGS>                                        1,457,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,662,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,899
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
§ 801.25 Rights of examinee—post-test phase. ( a ) The post-test phase refers to any questioning or other communication with the examinee following the use of the polygraph instrument, including review of the results of the test with the examinee. Before any adverse employment action, the employer must: ( 1 ) Further interview the examinee on the basis of the test results; and
( 2 ) Give to the examinee a written copy of any opinions or conclusions rendered in response to the test, as well as the questions asked during the test, with the corresponding charted responses. The term “corresponding charted responses” refers to copies of the entire examination charts recording the employee's physiological responses, and not just the examiner's written report which describes the examinee's responses to the questions as “charted” by the instrument.
ii
iii

Table of Contents

Abstract...............................................................................................................................ii

Results and Discussion.......................................................................................................1 

Apparatus and Procedures................................................................................................2 

Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................3 

Tables..................................................................................................................................4 

Figure ..................................................................................................................................9 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-130763 and Form S-8 No. 333-91192) previously filed by The LGL Group, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2010, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of The LGL Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and for the years then ended,
which includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the accounting principle from the last-in, first-out method, to the first-in, first-out method, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.









/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP




Roseland, New Jersey


March 31, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Melvin Lee, Appellant.

Submitted September 9, 1996;

decided September 12, 1996

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this criminal action *(see,*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90).
(78 South. 637)

#### PATTERSON v. HOLT.

(5 Div. 276.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 9, 1918.)

1. Exceptions, Bill or <®=»43(1) — Presentation — 'Time.

Where hill of exceptions was not presented to the trial judge within 90 days from the judgment, but was presented within 90 days from the ruling on motion for new trial, it could be considered only in reviewing the ruling on the motion for new trial.

2. Appeal and Error <&wkey;>502(7) — Record-Showing oe Exceptions:

Action of trial court on motion for new trial will not be reviewed, unless the hill of exceptions shows an exception to the ruling on the motion in view of Acts 1915, p. 722, as to review of rulings on motion for new trial.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Elmore County; Leon MjeCord, Judge.

Action between Mrs. M. E. Patterson and Zeke Holt. From tbe judgment rendered, Mrs. Patterson appeals, and Holt moves to dismiss tbe appeal.

Affirmed.

Frank W. Lull, of Wetumpka, Eugene Ballard, of Prattville, and W. P. McGaugb, of Montgomery, for appellant. George F. Smoot and J. M. Holley, both of Wetumpka, for appellee.

BRICKBN, J.

[1,2] This case is submitted on motion to dismiss the appeal and upon its merits. It affirmatively appears that the bill of exceptions was not presented to the trial judge within 90 days from the date of the rendition of the judgment, though it was presented within 90 days after the ruling and judgment of the court on the motion for a new trial; the bill of exceptions can therefore only be considered for the purpose of reviewing the action of the trial court on the motion for a new trial. McLeod v. Flourney, 3 Ala. App. 547, 57 South. 630. However, we are without authority to review the action of the trial court on the motion for a new trial, as no exception was reserved to the ruling of the court in this connection, and the action of the trial court on the motion for a new trial, will not he reviewed, unless the bill of exceptions shows an exception to the action of the court. Acts *1915,*p. 722; King v. State, ante, p. 103, 75 South. 692, 694; Dorough v. Harrington & Sons, 148 Ala. 305, 42 South. 557.

It follows that the judgment of the lower court must he affirmed.

Affirmed.
Order filed May 3, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00472

- CV

____________ CURTIS TYLER , Appellant

V.
TORCSILL FOUNDATIONS, LLC AND INTERVALE CAPITAL, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris Co u nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 07582



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due April 6, 2022

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before June 3, 2022 , the
court will dismiss th e appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 8.3 When to file. ( a ) Requests for review of wage determinations must be filed within 20 days of issuance of the Wage-Hour Administrator's decision denying a request to make a change in the wage determination.
( b ) The Board shall under no circumstances request any administering agency to postpone any contract action because of the filing of a petition.
#### § 784.12 “Commerce.”

“Commerce” as used in the Act includes interstate and foreign commerce. It is defined in section 3(b) of the Act to mean “trade, commerce, transportation, transmission, or communication among the several States or between any State and any place outside thereof.” (For the definition of “State,” see § 784.15.) The application of this definition and the kinds of activities which it includes are discussed at length in part 776 of this chapter dealing with the general coverage of the Act.