alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commercial Bank of Lynchburg *v.*Rucker.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*April 2,*1896.)

[24 S. *E.*Rep. 388.]

Appeal — When Allowed.

The court sustained, defendant’s demurrer to complainant’s hill, but overruled a motion to dismiss, and granted leave to amend the bill: *held,*that an appeal was improvidently awarded to defendant.

Appeal from circuit court of city of Lynchburg.

Suit by Lucy D. Bucker against the Commercial Bank of Lynchburg. From the decree, defendant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

*J. E. Edmunds*and *A. II.*Burroughs, for appellant.

*Wilson do Manson*and *F. P.*Christian, for appellee.

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case a bill was filed in the circuit court for the city of Lynchburg by Lucy D. Rucker v. Commercial National Bank of Lynchburg, and, the defendant having demurred, the court entered a decree sustaining the demurrer and overruling a motion for the dismissal of the bill, but granting leave to the plaintiff to file an amended bill. From this decree an appeal was allowed by one of this court. We are of opinion that it was improvidently awarded, and it is therefore dismissed.
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 34 

To provide a replacement laboratory and support space at the Smithsonian 

Environmental Research Center (SERC) Mathias Laboratory. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2008 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To provide a replacement laboratory and support space at 

the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (SERC) 

Mathias Laboratory. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERC MATHIAS LABORATORY. 

4 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

5 is authorized to plan, design, and construct laboratory and 

6 support space to accommodate the Mathias Laboratory at 

7 the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in 

8 Edgewater, Maryland. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SJ 34 IS 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated for the pur3 poses described in section 1 $3,500,000 for fiscal year 

4 2009 and a total of $37,500,000 for all succeeding fiscal 

5 years. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE - SFAS NO 128 This schedule contains summary
financial information extracted from Lukens Inc. Financial Statements for the
fifty-two weeks ended December 30, 1995, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000 
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                             11,056
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     137,233
<ALLOWANCES>                        6,632
<INVENTORY>                       163,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  314,891
<PP&E>                            908,379
<DEPRECIATION>                    378,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    919,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             208,670
<BONDS>                           217,339
<COMMON>                              158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                        29,665
<OTHER-SE>                        268,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      919,663
<SALES>                         1,049,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,049,158
<CGS>                             922,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     922,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   10,044
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 13,471
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    54,509
<INCOME-TAX>                       20,495
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                34,014
 <DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
 <NET-INCOME>                      34,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2.05
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 ---------------------------------------------

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lifen, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date: May 5, 2003                By:  /s/ Lawrence M. Davis
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                          Lawrence M. Davis
                                          Chief Financial Officer
#### Charity Smith, appellant, v. David T. Mount et al., appellees.

Filed October 18, 1893.

No. 5022.

Ejectment: Title by Prescription: Permissive Occupancy. The decree in this case is affirmed, the facts and law being essentially the same as in the case of *Smith v.*Hitchcock, 38 Neb.,. 104, decided at the present term.

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county.. Heard below before Wakeley, J.

*David Van Mien*and *Joseph T. Patch,*for appellant.

*Montgomery, Charlton & Hall, contra.*

Ragan, C.

This is a suit in equity brought in the district court of Douglas county by Charity Smith against David T. Mount, in which she alleges that she is the owner and in possession of a part of lot 1 in Capitol Addition to the city of Omaha, and has been for about twenty-two years; that Mount had interfered, and was threatening to interfere, with her possession. She has no paper title to the property, but bases her title on adverse possession. The prayer of the petition is for an injunction restraining Mount from interfering with her possession, and to quiet and confirm the title to the property in her.

The answer of Mount was a general denial, and setting out his possession of the real estate described in plaintiff’s petition; that he had been in possession of it since 1886, and had erected a brick residence thereon in which he was living; that he derived his title from one Gilbert M. Hitchcock, who derived his title from the late Senator Hitchcock, and his title came from his wife, Annie M. Hitchcock, who *112owned the land as far back as 1869. The prayer of Mount’s answer was that the title to the real estate might be quieted and confirmed in him, and that the petition of Mrs. Smith might be dismissed.

There was a trial to the court, who rendered a decree dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, and quieting the title to the property in controversy in Mount, and Mrs. Smith appeals to this court.

All the essential points in this case, and the law applicable thereto, are stated in the case of *Smith v. Hitchcock,*38 Neb., 104, decided at this term of court, and following the conclusion reached in that case, the decree of the district court in the case at bar is

Affirmed.

Ryan, C., concurs.

Irvine, C., having been of counsel in the case of *Smith v. Hitchcock,*38 Neb., 104, took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.
#### Aiken *et al. v.*Donnelley *et al.*

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*April 20, 1896.)*

[24 S. E. Rep. 909.]

Failure to Move for Continuance — Effect.

It is not error to proceed with a hearing where no motion is made nor cause shown for a continuance.

Equity Practice — Joint Defendants — Dismission—Case at Bar.

Where a bill is filed against joint defendants, and is taken for confessed against one or more of them for want of appearance, and one or more of the other defendants appear, make defense, and disprove complainant’s case, the bill should be dismissed as to all defendants.

Appeal from circuit court, Fairfax county.

Bill by Mary J. Aiken and others against Margaret Donnelley and others for partition. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

Affirmed.

*John*Griteher, for appellants.

*Moore <&*Keith, for appellees.

'Buchanan, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellants insist that the circuit court erred in not continuing the case when it was heard and the bill dismissed. The ground upon which they base this contention is that only one of the three defendants to the bill had appeared and answered ; *384that the bill was taken for confessed as to the other defendants ; that no testimony had been taken to establish the allegations of the bill; and that a rule prevailed in the circuit court of that circuit not to try a case at the first term after it was brought, in the absence of counsel, unless- both parties consented.

There is no evidence that there was any such rule of court as is relied on. It does not appear that counsel was absent. The record shows no motion for a continuance. The court did not err in hearing the case, since no motion was made nor cause shown for continuance. Dillard v. Dillard’s Ex’rs (Va.) 21 S. E. 669-671.

Upon the merits the injunction ought to have been dissolved and the bill dismissed. It is true that only one of the defendants had appeared and answered.

But her defense was not personal to herself, but common to all the defendants. They were jointly interested in the subject of litigation.

Where a bill is filed against two or more defendants jointly interested, and is taken for confessed against one or more of them for want of appearance, and one or more of the other defendants appear, make defense, and disprove the complainant’s case, the bill should be dismissed as to all the defendants. This is well settled. Cartigne v. Raymond, 4 Leigh, 579 ; Payne v. Graves, 5 Leigh, 579 ; Ashby v. Bell, 80 Va. 811 ; Terry v. Fontaine’s Adm’r, 83 Va. 451, 458, 2 S. E. 743.

The auswer of the defendant who did appear was under oath, responsive to the allegations of the bill, denied that the appellants had title to or any interest in the land they sought to have partitioned, alleged that she and her co-defendants were the owners of the property, and filed as exhibits with her answer copies of their title papers. There was no proof whatever to sustain the complainants’ claim.

The decree of-the court appealed from must be affirmed.
§ 99.310 Financial statements. ( a ) *Financial statements.* The auditee shall prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The financial statements shall be for the same organizational unit and fiscal year that is chosen to meet the requirements of this part. However, organization-wide financial statements may also include departments, agencies, and other organizational units that have separate audits in accordance with § 99.500(a) and prepare separate financial statements.
( b ) *Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards.* The auditee shall also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule shall: ( 1 ) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For Federal programs included in a cluster of programs, list individual Federal programs within a cluster of programs. For R&D, total Federal awards expended shall be shown either by individual award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. For example, the National Institutes of Health is a major subdivision in the Department of Health and Human Services.
( 2 ) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity shall be included.
( 3 ) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the CFDA number or other identifying number when the CFDA information is not available.
( 4 ) Include notes that describe the significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule.
( 5 ) To the extent practical, pass-through entities should identify in the schedule the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program.
( 6 ) Include, in either the schedule or a note to the schedule, the value of the Federal awards expended in the form of non-cash assistance, the amount of insurance in effect during the year, and loans or loan guarantees outstanding at year end. While not required, it is preferable to present this information in the schedule.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

                                 Jurisdiction of

               Name                                       Incorporation
               ----                                       -------------

               Cybex Financial Corporation                New York

               Eagle Performance Systems,
               Inc.                                       Minnesota

               Cybex Fitness Gerate
               Vertriebs, GmbH                            Germany

               General Medical Equipment,
               Ltd.                                       Barbados

               Lumex Bed Systems, Inc.                    Pennsylvania

               Tectrix Fitness Equipment,
               Inc.                                       California

               Tectrix Fitness Equipment
               Limited                                    United Kingdom

               Tectrix Fitness Equipment
               Vertriebs GmbH                             Germany
EXHIBIT
32


STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol Federal Financial (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, John B. Dicus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent G. Townsend,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in such Report.














Date:   August
4, 2008  
                                                      By:   /s/ John B.
Dicus


John
B. Dicus, President and


Chief
Executive Officer











Date:   August
4,
2008                                 
                       By:   /s/ Kent G.
Townsend


Kent
G. Townsend, Executive Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer
### Bibliography of publications relating to ground water prepared by the Geological Survey and cooperating agencies, 1946-55

By: Robert C. Vorhis

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1492

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

AIR AND RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION 

SUBJ BCT , PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED STATB IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) AND BASB YEAR I NVENTORY FOR 

THB BALTIMORE MARYLAND RBGI ON 8- HOUR OZONE NONATTAI NKBNT AREA 

DATE , Ma y 2 2. 2 007 

Name Signature Address City and Zip Organization or Do YOU Wl.sh 

(please print) Cod. Affiliation To Testi f y? 

//u oll/E /t~ cNtJcO 

;tIo ~7>tVlI > NT S ,cL('~ Iv ~O
#### § 779.217 “Unified operation” defined.

Webster defines the word “unify” to mean “to cause to be one; to make into a unit; to unite.” The pertinent definition of “operation” is a method or way of operating, working or functioning. Since the term “unified operation” has reference to the method of performing the related activities, it means combining, uniting, or organizing their performance so that they are in effect a single business unit or an organized business system which is an economic unit directed to the accomplishment of a common business purpose. The term “unified operation” thus includes a business which may consist of separate segments but which is conducted or operated as a unit or as a single business for a common business purpose.
#### § 452.130 Expenses of delegates.

A local may elect two groups—one which would receive expenses while the other would be required to pay its own way, provided each member has an equal opportunity to run for the expense-paid as well as the non-expense-paid positions.
Certificate of Limited Partnership for MDS Energy Public 2013-B LP



 Exhibit 4.3 

CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 FOR 
 MDS ENERGY PUBLIC 2013-B LP 







 State of Delaware 

Secretary of State 
 Division or Corporations 
 Delivered 02:08 PM 05/03/2012 

FILED 02:01 PM 05/03/2012 
 SRV 120506191 – 5149126 FILE 
 STATE OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
  

	 	•	 	 The Undersigned, desiring to form a limited partnership pursuant to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Delaware Code,
Chapter 17, do hereby certify as follows: 


  

	 	•	 	 First: The name of the limited partnership is MDS Energy Public 2013-B LP.  



 

	 	•	 	 Second: The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is 1220 North Market Street, Suite 806 in the city of Wilmington. Zip code
19801. The name of the Registered Agent at such address is Registered Agents Legal Services, LLC. 


  

	 	•	 	 Third: The name and mailing address of each general partners is as follows: 



 

	
	MDS Energy Development,
LLC
	409 Butler Road, Suite A
	Kittanning, PA 16201

 In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Limited Partnership as of the
3rd day of May, A.D. 2012. 
  

					
	MDS Energy Development, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael D.Snyder

		 	General Partner(s)
		
	Name:	 	 Michael D. Snyder.

		 		 	Print or Type 
		 		 	Authorized Person of Managing General Partner
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAN01000.L10200000.XZ0000]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northwest California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northwest California Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday and Thursday, Sept. 7 and 8, 
2011, at the BLM Arcata Field Office, 1695 Heindon Rd., Arcata, 
California. On Sept. 7, the RAC will convene at 10 a.m. and depart for 
a field tour to the Lost Coast Headlands project and the South Spit 
Management Area. Members of the public are welcome. They must provide 
their own transportation, food and beverages. On Sept. 8, the council 
will convene at 8 a.m. in the Conference Room of the BLM Arcata Field 
Office. The meeting is open to the public. Time for public comment has 
been reserved at 11 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Haug, BLM Northern California 
District manager, (530) 224-2160; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph 
J. Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northwest 
California. At this meeting agenda topics include management of the 
King Range National Conservation Area, status of the Walker Ridge Wind 
Energy proposal, management of the Sacramento River Bend Area of 
Critical Environmental Concern and environmental education programs. 
All meetings are open to the public. Members of the public may present 
written comments to the council. Each formal council meeting will have 
time allocated for public comments. Depending on the number of persons 
wishing to speak, and the time available, the time for individual 
comments may be limited. Members of the public are welcome on field 
tours, but they must provide their own transportation and lunch. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation and other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: August 3, 2011.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20462 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
#### § 401.14 Officer.

*Officer* means any constitutional officer, any person authorized to perform the functions of president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or other executive functions of a labor organization, and any member of its executive board or similar governing body.