alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Gaston, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  December 8, 2005

By:   /s/ Bruce Gaston

Name:  Bruce Gaston

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
### SERVED: January 28, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### ARCTIC AIR ALASKA, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA 2014-0316 (Civil Penalty Action).



### ORDER OF DISMISSAL ,-·., ...

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") filed a Complaint dated May 22, 2014. Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a Response dated September 8, 2014. Complainantwithdrewthe Complaint on January 21, 2015. 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215 states: "Atany time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifari. agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice.'' WHEREFORE, Complainant having withdrawn the Complaint, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice
.

..-·r·" ··(' 

### ri " ' <: ·' ./.
. I '

....**\{;.'(.\.~---** (!"
...(

**.·-··-~··"t·t::7't;if..-tt**..\. ,) Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1
James I.

### Hamilton, President /CEO Arctic Air Alaska, Inc., Respondent 

### 3540 University Ave. South Fairbanks, AK 99709 Peter Lynch, Complainant's Counsel 

### Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement Office ofthe Chief Counsel, AGC-300 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591

TEL: 202-267-7728 FAX: 202-267-5106 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington,DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0316 (Civil Penalty Action)

1St:trvice was by U.S. Mail. For service inpersonorby expedited courier, use the following

address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wrig_htBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
3
**Exhibit
      32.2**










Section
      906 Certification


The
          following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form
          10-Q of
          the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
          2002 (18
          U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The
          undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
          with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15
          U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
          presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of
          the MLM Index Fund.





August
      14, 2007




/s/
      James
      A. Mehling





Vice
        President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Mount
        Lucas Management Corporation,
 the
        manager of the MLM Index Fund
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors of
Saville Systems PLC

We
have audited the consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows of Saville Systems PLC and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1997 (not
separately presented herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements of Saville Systems PLC and its subsidiaries referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1997 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Ernst
& Young Chartered Accountants
Galway, Ireland
January 22, 1998
(Except for Comprehensive Income as to which the date is March 12, 1999)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: James Calfee v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-21-00454-CR

Trial court case number: 1591474

Trial court: 178th District Court of Harris County

The brief of appellant, James Calfee, does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure 9.10(a)(3), (b). Accordingly, appellant’s brief is struck. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a). 

Appellant is granted 10 days from the date of this order to file a corrected brief complying 

with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.10 (“Privacy Protection for Documents Filed in 

Criminal Cases”). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(d) (“Sensitive data must be redacted by using the 

letter “X” in place of each omitted digit or character or by removing the sensitive data in a 

manner indicated that the data has been redacted.”). Appellee, the State of Texas, may file an 

amended appellee’s brief within 10 days of the filing of appellant’s corrected brief. Appellee’s 

motion to seal appellant’s brief is denied as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly_____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____June 23, 2022____
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 1 52 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID JON KINDT ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 24 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2020

07/20/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0152
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 11-073]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Earth Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific and technical information relevant to program planning. 

# DATES:

Wednesday, August 31, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. E.D.T.

# ADDRESSES:

This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person may call the USA toll free conference call number 888-603-9610, pass code ESS, to participate in this meeting by telephone.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4452, fax (202) 358-4118, or                         *mnorris@nasa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

—Government Performance and Results Act Review

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

August 5, 2011.

Susan M. Burch, 

Acting Director, Advisory Committee Management Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-20275 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
#### § 783.23 Pay standards for “newly covered” employees.

There are some employees whose individual activities would not bring them within the minimum wage or overtime pay provisions of the Act as it was prior to the 1961 amendments, but who are brought within minimum wage or overtime coverage or both for the first time by the new “enterprise” coverage provisions or changes in exemptions, or both, which were enacted as part of the amendments and made effective September 3, 1961. Typical of such employees are those who, regardless of any engagement in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, are employed as seamen and would therefore have been exempt from minimum wage as well as overtime pay requirements by virtue of section 13(a)(14) of the Act until the 1961 amendments if so employed during that period, but who by virtue of these amendments are exempt only from the overtime pay requirements on and after September 3, 1961, under section 13(b)(6) of the amended Act. These “newly covered” employees for whom no specific exemption has been retained or provided in the amendments must be paid not less than the minimum wages shown in the schedule below for hours worked, computed, in the case of employees employed as seamen, in accordance with the special provisions of section 6(b)(2) which are discussed in subsequent sections of this part. Any “newly covered” employees who are not exempted by section 13(b)(6) because of their employment as seamen must be paid, unless exempted by some other provision, not less than one and one-half times their regular rates of pay for overtime, as shown in the schedule below.

| Beginning | Minimum wage ([29 U.S.C. 206(b)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/29/206)) | Overtime pay ([29 U.S.C. 207(a)(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/29/207)) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sept. 3, 1961 | $1 an hour | None required. |
| Sept. 3, 1963 | No change | After 44 hours in a workweek |
| Sept. 3, 1964 | $1.15 an hour | After 42 hours in a workweek. |
| Sept. 3, 19651 and thereafter | $1.25 an hour | After 40 hours in a workweek. |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Requirements identical to those for employees under “old” coverage. (Minimum wage rates for newly covered employees, in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and American Samoa are set by wage order on recommendations of special industry committees ([29 U.S.C. 206(a)(3)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/29/206); 206(c)(2). Information on these rates may be obtained at any office of the Wage and Hour and Public Contracts Divisions.) | | |
Exhibit 32










<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




         Michael W. Dosland, President and Chief Executive Officer and Michael
S. Moderski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Federal
Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his capacity as an officer of
the Company that he has reviewed the quarterly report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") and that to the best of
his knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

         The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



May 10, 2006                          /s/ Michael W. Dosland
---------------------                -----------------------
Date                                 Michael W. Dosland
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


May 10, 2006                         /s/ Michael S. Moderski
---------------------                -----------------------
Date                                 Michael S. Moderski
                                     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                     Officer
#### § 110.53 Niantic, Conn.

Beginning on the shoreline at latitude 41°18′25.3′′, longitude 72°12′16.3′′; thence to latitude 41°18′23.3′′, longitude 72°12′11.6′′; thence to latitude 41°18′50.7′′, longitude 72°11′51.5′′; thence to the shoreline at latitude 41°18′56.5′′, longitude 72°12′05.6′′; thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.

[CGFR 69-24, 34 FR 6480, Apr. 15, 1969, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 10.16


Amendment to Project Transfer Agreement


 


Party A: Sanhe City Lucksky Electrical Engineering
Co., Ltd


Party B: Xianning Auspicious Day Air energy
Power Company Limited


 


Party A and Party B reached
an agreement on April 25, 2014 about transfer the Lucksky Natural Energy Power Generation System and signed the Agreement at the
same day. The Item III-2 said “Party B decides to buy the electricity generation project from Party A; where the concerted
installation capacity is 12 MW and the sum approximates RMB 216,000,000 Yuan (specific price is subject to the stipulation in the
technical scheme both parties agree on). ”


 


Now According to this item
and the technical scheme both partied agreed, change the agreed capacity to 6 MW and the sum to RMB 84,000,000 Yuan.


 


This statement as an annex
of the "Agreement" has the same legal effect with the "Agreement".


 


Party A: Sanhe City Lucksky Electrical Engineering
Co., Ltd


Party B: Xianning Auspicious Day Air energy
Power Company Limited


Date: November 12, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 266 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 266

       Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2007

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following be the minority membership on the 
following committees for the remainder of the 110th Congress, or until 
their successors are appointed:
    Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: Mr. Domenici, Mr. Craig, 
Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Burr, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Corker, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Smith, Mr. Bunning, and Mr. Martinez.
    Committee on Environment and Public Works: Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Warner, 
Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
Alexander, and Mr. Bond.
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Lott, Ms. Snowe, 
Mr. Kyl, Mr. Smith, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. 
Ensign.
    Committee on Indian Affairs: Ms. Murkowski, Mr. McCain, Mr. Coburn, 
Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Smith, and Mr. Burr.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-03791 and NAFTA-3791A]


House of Perfection, Incorporated, Williston Manufacturing Co. 
Williston, SC and Capitol City Manufacturing Co., West Columbia, SC; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 250(a), subchapter 2, title II, of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on April 13, 2000, applicable to workers of House 
of Perfection, Incorporated, Williston Manufacturing Co., Williston, 
South Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 
11, 2000 (65 FR 30444).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of children's apparel such as shorts, tops, blouses 
and pants for its parent company, House of Perfection, Incorporated, 
West Columbia, South Carolina. New information shows that Capitol City 
Manufacturing Co. is a division of House of Perfection, Incorporated. 
Worker separations will occur at the subject firm when it closes in 
June, 2000. The workers produce children's apparel such as shorts tops, 
blouses and pants.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
workers of Capitol City Manufacturing Co., West Columbia, South 
Carolina.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of House of Perfection, Incorporated who were adversely 
affected by a shift of production to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-03791 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of House of Perfection, Incorporated, Williston 
Manufacturing, Williston, South Carolina (NAFTA-03791) and Capitol 
Manufacturing Co., West Columbia, South Carolina (NAFTA-03791A) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
March 8, 1999 through April 13, 2002 are eligible to apply for 
NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of May, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-13470 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### § 70.39 Statutes specifically providing for setting of fees.

This subpart will not apply to fees charged under any statute, other than the FOIA, that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees for particular types of records.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-26053, 33-63962, 33-63964, 333-48155, 333-46558 and
333-103817) of our report dated August 15, 2003. With respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Compex Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003.

|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 25, 2003

1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6918
LEON QUARLES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-03-3374-25BD) Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 14, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leon Quarles, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Leon Quarles seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation on his petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[115th Congress Public Law 193]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Public Law 115-193
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the health care center of the Department of Veterans 
  Affairs in Tallahassee, Florida, as the Sergeant Ernest I. ``Boots'' 
 Thomas VA Clinic, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: June 25, 2018 -  [S. 
                                2246]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
                              CLINIC IN FLORIDA.

    (a) Designation.--The Health Care Center of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 2181 Orange Avenue in Tallahassee, Florida, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Ernest I. `Boots' Thomas VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 
referred to in paragraph (1) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Sergeant Ernest I. ``Boots'' Thomas VA Clinic.

    Approved June 25, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2246:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Feb. 14, considered and passed Senate.
            June 7, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```