alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
County 

Population 

based on 2010 

census

Actual 

uncontrolled 

VOC emissions 

Summer (tons)

Actual 

uncontrolled 

VOC 

emissions 

Winter (tons)

Controlled 

VOC 

emissions 

Summer 

(tons)

Controlled 

VOC 

emissions 

Winter (tons)

Difference 

between 

controlled 

and 

uncontrolled 

during 

summer

Tons 

Increase 

per Day

Cherokee 214346 10.01338774 4.957608634 8.0107102 1.288978245 2.002677547 0.008208

Clayton 259424 12.11925158 6.000217696 9.6954013 1.560056601 2.423850317 0.009934

Cobb 688078 32.14425185 15.91455606 25.715401 4.137784576 6.42885037 0.026348

Coweta 127317 5.947740972 2.944714893 4.7581928 0.765625872 1.189548194 0.004875

Dekalb 691893 32.32247339 16.0027932 25.857979 4.160726231 6.464494678 0.026494

Douglas 132403 6.185338548 3.062348987 4.9482708 0.796210737 1.23706771 0.00507

Fayette 106567 4.978383972 2.464788143 3.9827072 0.640844917 0.995676794 0.004081

Forsyth 175511 8.199171876 4.059393919 6.5593375 1.055442419 1.639834375 0.006721

Fulton 920581 43.005862 21.29211795 34.40469 5.535950667 8.601172399 0.035251

Gwinnett 805321 37.62137584 18.62626941 30.097101 4.842830046 7.524275167 0.030837

Henry 203922 9.526420152 4.716511938 7.6211361 1.226293104 1.90528403 0.007809

paulding 142324 6.648807984 3.291811796 5.3190464 0.855871067 1.329761597 0.00545

Rockdale 85215 3.98090394 1.970937735 3.1847232 0.512443811 0.796180788 0.003263

Total 13 county 212.6933698 105.3040704 170.1547 27.37905829 42.53867397 0.174339

Difference 

between 

controlled and 

uncontrolled 

during 

summer

42.53867397

Difference 

between 

controlled and 

uncontrolled 

during winter 

77.92501206
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 8.7 Review of decisions in other proceedings. ( a ) A petition for review of a decision of an Administrative Law Judge pursuant to subparts B, D or E of part 6 of this title may be filed by any aggrieved party in accordance with the provisions therein.
( b ) A petition for review of a final written decision (other than a wage determination) of the Administrator or authorized representative may be filed by any aggrieved party within 60 days of the date of the decision of which review is sought. Where a case has been referred directly to the Board pursuant to § 4.11 or § 4.12 of this title, no petition for review shall be necessary; a brief in support of the aggrieved party's position shall be filed within 30 days of filing of the administrative record by the Administrator.
( c ) A petition shall state concisely the points relied upon, and shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth supporting reasons. The petition shall also indicate whether or not the petitioner consents to the disposition of the questions involved by a single member.
#### § 778.313 Computing overtime pay under the Act for employees compensated on task basis.

(a) An example of the operation of a plan of the second type discussed in § 778.312 may serve to illustrate the effects on statutory overtime computations of payment on a task basis. Assume the following facts: The employment agreement establishes a basic hourly rate of $5 per hour, provides for the payment of $7.50 per hour for overtime work (in excess of the basic workday or workweek) and defines the basic workday as 8 hours, and the basic workweek as 40 hours, Monday through Friday. It further provides that the assembling of a machine constitutes a day's work. An employee who completes the assembling job in less than 8 hours will be paid 8 hours' pay at the established rate of $5 per hour and will receive pay at the “overtime” rate for hours worked after the completion of the task. An employee works the following hours in a particular week:

| | M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hours spent on task | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 81/2 | 6 | 0 |
| Day's pay under contract | $40 | $40 | $40 | $40 | $40 | $60 | 0 |
| Additional hours | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 |
| Additional pay under contract | $15 | 0 | $15 | $7.50 | $7.50 | 0 | 0 |

(b) In the example in paragraph (a) of this section the employee has actually worked a total of 48 hours and is owed under the contract a total of $305 for the week. The only sums which can be excluded as overtime premiums from this total before the regular rate is determined are the extra $2.50 payments for the extra hour on Thursday and Friday made because of work actually in excess of 8 hours. The payment of the other premium rates under the contract is either without regard to whether or not the hours they compensated were in excess of a bona fide daily or weekly standard or without regard to the number of overtime hours worked. Thus only the sum of $5 is excluded from the total. The remaining $300 is divided by 48 hours to determine the regular rate—$6.25 per hour. One-half this rate is due under the Act as extra compensation for each of the 8 overtime hours—$25. The $5 payment under the contract for actual excess hours may be credited and the balance—$20—is owed in addition to the $305 due under the contract.

[46 FR 7315, Jan. 23, 1981]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350

(Section 906of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection withthe filing by Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”),each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:

 
| 1.     | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/ Barry M. Portnoy                                       |   | /s/ David J. Hegarty                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Barry M. Portnoy                                           |   | David J. Hegarty                       |
| Managing Trustee                                           |   | President and Chief  Operating Officer |
|                                                       |   |                                   |
|                                                       |   |                                   |
| /s/ Adam D. Portnoy                                        |   | /s/ Richard A. Doyle                   |
| Adam D. Portnoy                                            |   | Richard A. Doyle                       |
| Managing Trustee                                           |   | Treasurer and Chief  Financial Officer |
|                                                       |   |                                   |
|                                                       |   |                                   |
| Date:       May 7, 2009 |   |                                   |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.05-60 Negotiated rulemaking. ( a ) The Coast Guard may establish a negotiated rulemaking committee under the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. App. 2) when it is in the public interest.
( b ) Generally, the Coast Guard will consider negotiated rulemaking when: ( 1 ) There is a need for a rule;
( 2 ) There are a limited number of representatives for identifiable parties affected by the rule;
( 3 ) There is a reasonable chance that balanced representation can be reached in the negotiated rulemaking committee and that the committee members will negotiate in good faith;
( 4 ) There is a likelihood of a committee consensus in a fixed time period;
( 5 ) The negotiated rulemaking process will not unreasonably delay the rule;
( 6 ) The Coast Guard has resources to do negotiated rulemaking; and
( 7 ) The Coast Guard can use the consensus of the committee in formulating the NPRM and final rule.
#### FIRST CITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK v DOOLITTLE, Exr etc

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1767.

Decided March 3, 1930

Slabaugh, Seiberling, Huber & Guinther, Akron, for B,ank.

Doolittle, Foust & Holden, Akron, for Doolittle.

Funk, PJ and Washburn, J., concur.

Full opinion will be published later. Watch Omnibus Index.
§ 825.401 Filing a complaint with the Federal Government. ( a ) A complaint may be filed in person, by mail or by telephone, with the Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor. A complaint may be filed at any local office of the Wage and Hour Division; the address and telephone number of local offices may be found in telephone directories or on the Department's Web site.
( b ) A complaint filed with the Secretary of Labor should be filed within a reasonable time of when the employee discovers that his or her FMLA rights have been violated. In no event may a complaint be filed more than two years after the action which is alleged to be a violation of FMLA occurred, or three years in the case of a willful violation.
( c ) No particular form of complaint is required, except that a complaint must be reduced to writing and should include a full statement of the acts and/or omissions, with pertinent dates, which are believed to constitute the violation.
[78 FR 8902, Feb. 6, 2013, as amended at 82 FR 2230, Jan. 9, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34181-34182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Open Meeting, Technical Mapping Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec. 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
gives notice that the following meeting will be held:

NAME: Technical Mapping Advisory Council.

DATE OF MEETING: June 1-2, 2000.

PLACE: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region III Office, Liberty 
Square Bldg., 2nd Floor, 105 S. Seventh Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106-
3316.

TIMES: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., both days.

PROPOSED AGENDA:   
    1. Call to Order and Announcements.
    2. Action on Minutes of Previous Meetings.
    3. Discussion of Final Annual Report.
    4. New Business.
    5. Adjournment.

STATUS: This meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Buckley, P.E., Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., room 421, Washington, DC 
20472, telephone (202) 646-2756 or by facsimile at (202) 646-4596.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public with 
limited seating available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members 
of the general public who plan to attend the meeting should contact Ms. 
Sally P. Magee, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
room 442, Washington, DC 20472, telephone (202) 646-8242 or by 
facsimile at (202) 646-4596 on or before May 29, 2000.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available upon 
request 30 days after they have been approved by the next Technical 
Mapping Advisory Council meeting.


[[Page 34182]]


    Dated: May 22, 2000.
Michael J. Armstrong,
Associate Director for Mitigation.
[FR Doc. 00-13326 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-04-P
#### Antao & Chuang, Appellant, v Sr. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Respondent.

Submitted July 8, 1996;

decided September 17, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of plaintiffs motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

EXECUTION VERSION 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO

 SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Shareholders Agreement is made and entered into as of April 21,
2015, by and among Cambridge Holdco, Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation (“Holdco”), Por Liu, a natural person (the “Parakou Shareholder”), and Benjamin Gordon, a natural person (the “Cambridge
Stockholder” and, together with the Parakou Shareholder, the “Shareholders”). 
 WHEREAS, Parent, Holdco, Merger
Sub, the Company and the Shareholder are parties to that certain Shareholders Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2014 (the “Shareholders Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain terms of the Shareholders Agreement in accordance with Section 3(a) of the
Shareholders Agreement as set forth below. 
 AGREEMENT 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and intending to be legally bound
hereby, each of the parties hereto hereby agrees as follows: 
  

	1.	Definitions. Capitalized terms contained in this Amendment, but not specifically defined in this Amendment, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Shareholders Agreement. 


 

	2.	Amendment to Shareholders Agreement. 

  

	 	(a)	Section 2(a)(i) of the Shareholders Agreement is hereby amended by replacing “35%” with “20%”. 

  

	 	(b)	Section 2(a)(ii) of the Shareholders Agreement is hereby amended by replacing “35%” with “20%”, and 20% with “15%”. 


 

	 	(c)	Section 2(a)(iii) of the Shareholders Agreement is hereby amended by replacing “20%” with “15%”. 

  

	3.	Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all of the terms, covenants, agreements, conditions and other provisions of the Shareholders Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
in accordance with their respective terms. This Amendment is limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed to be an amendment to any other term or condition of the Shareholders Agreement or any of the documents referred to therein. As used in
the Shareholders Agreement, the terms “this Agreement”, “herein”, “hereinafter”, “hereunder”, “hereto” and words of similar import shall mean and refer to, from and after the date hereof, unless the
context otherwise requires, the Shareholders Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 









	4.	Miscellaneous. The provisions of Section 3 of the Shareholders Agreement shall apply to this Amendment mutatis mutandis, and to the Shareholders Agreement as modified by this Amendment, taken
together as a single agreement, reflecting the terms as modified hereby. 

 [Signature page follows] 

  
 -2- 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date
first written above by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized. 
  

			
	CAMBRIDGE HOLDCO, INC.
		
	By		 /s/ Benjamin Gordon

	Name:		Benjamin Gordon
	Title:		Chief Executive Officer
	
	             /s/ Por
Liu

	POR LIU
	
	             /s/ Benjamin
Gordon

	BENJAMIN GORDON
#### § 93.410 Enforcement.

The head of each agency shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the provisions herein are vigorously implemented and enforced in that agency.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8405

JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (2:08-cv-03577-HMH-RSC)

Submitted: November 9, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus, dismissing the action without prejudice for failure to state a claim, and directing that the dismissal count as a “strike” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Our review of the record convinces us that Rochester did not meet his burden of showing that he had no other adequate means to obtain the relief requested and that his right to relief was clear and indisputable. See In re: First

Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We therefore affirm the denial of Rochester’s mandamus petition. After the district court issued its decision, we held that the dismissal of an action without prejudice for failure to state a claim may not count as a “strike” under the PLRA.

McLean v. United States , 566 F.3d 391, 395 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the district court’s order is modified to reflect that the dismissal does not qualify as a strike. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

23 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to compel the State to discontinue discriminating against Appellant is denied.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
EXHIBIT 12.2  Madison Gas and Electric Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2007 (In thousands)  EarningsNet Income before minority interest$47,792Equity earnings(6,286)Income distribution from equity investees4,441Minority interest in pre-tax income(5,116)Amortization of capitalized interest102Interest capitalized(3,949)Federal and state income taxes27,085Fixed charges21,102Total Earnings as Defined$85,171Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$14,788Interest on rentals*1,004Amortization of debt issuance costs543AFUDC borrowed funds818Capitalized interest3,949Total Fixed Charges$21,102Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges4.04x   *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
An official website of the United States government          

Here’s how you know

**Official websites use .gov**A              **.gov** website belongs to an official government              organization in the United States.            

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A              **lock** (              LockLocked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.            

Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site

* * Announcements

A - Z Browse

- OAM Home
- Materials
- Activity Ideas
- Social Media
- History   - OAM History
  - 2023
  - 2022
  - 2021
  - 2020
  - 2019
  - 2018
  - Earlier Years

Go to ACL.gov * *

# Older Americans Month 2016

May is a month of fresh beginnings. Perennials bloom once again, blazing a trail of bright color. May is also when we celebrate Older American’s Month (OAM), acknowledging the perennial contributions of older adults to our nation. The 2016 OAM theme is **Blaze a Trail**. The Administration for Community Living will use this opportunity to raise awareness about important issues facing older adults. We will also highlight the ways that older Americans are advocating for themselves, their peers, and their communities.

Be a trailblazer! Join us in promoting activities, inclusion, and wellness for older Americans in your community. Additional outreach tools coming soon!
                  - Logos
                  - Posters
                  - Badges
                  - Info Tip Sheets
                  - Resources
                  - Stories
                  - Sample Article:  DOCX (63KB)
                  - Sample Proclamation:  DOCX (67KB)
                  - Activity Suggestions:  PDF (907KB)
                  - Event Tips:  PDF (259KB)
                  - Trailblazer Story Competition Guide:  PDF (854KB)

*Last modified on 02/03/2019*

 

 

**         Back to Top    

## 

 

## What We Do and Why We Do It

ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

 

* *Facebook* *YouTube  X* *LinkedIn* *Share on Other Platforms

 

## Site Support

-  Home 
-  Accessibility 
-  Disclaimers 
-  Contact Us 
-  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Site Map 
-  Viewers & Players 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

## Other ACL Sites

-  Disability Assistance and Information Line  
-  Eldercare Locator 
-  ElderJustice.acl.gov 
-  LongTermCare.gov 
-  OlderIndians.gov 

## Related Sites

-  Grants.gov 
-  HHS.gov 
-  No Fear Act  
-  Plain Writing (on HHS.gov) 
-  USA.gov 
-  WhiteHouse.gov 
-  Vote.gov 

## **Sign up for ACL Updates**

Subscribe ** **

*Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement of Gencor Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 for the registration of 3,556,000 ($.10 par value) shares of its common stock issuable pursuant to its 1992 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Stock Option Agreements and 1997
Stock Option Plan (SEC File Number 333-61769) and in the related prospectus of our report dated December 8, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Gencor Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ MOORE STEPHENS LOVELACE, P.A.
|MOORE STEPHENS LOVELACE, P.A.    
|                                 
|CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS     
|                                 
|Orlando, Florida                 
|                                 
|December 20, 2006
#### § 95.20 Purpose of financial and program management.

Sections 95.21 through 95.28 prescribe standards for financial management systems, methods for making payments and rules for: Satisfying cost sharing and matching requirements, accounting for program income, budget revision approvals, making audits, determining allowability of cost, and establishing fund availability.