alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 71.13 Employee standards of conduct. ( a ) Each component shall inform its employees of the provisions of the Privacy Act, including the Act's civil liability and criminal penalty provisions. Each component also shall notify its employees that they have a duty to: ( 1 ) Protect the security of records,
( 2 ) Ensure the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness of records,
( 3 ) Avoid the unauthorized disclosure, either verbal or written, of records, and
( 4 ) Ensure that the component maintains no system of records without public notice.
( b ) Except to the extent that the Privacy Act permits such activities, an employee of the Department of Labor shall: ( 1 ) Not collect information of a personal nature from individuals unless the employee is authorized to collect such information to perform a function or discharge a responsibility of the Department;
( 2 ) Collect from individuals only that information which is necessary to the performance of the functions or to the discharge of the responsibilities of the Department;
( 3 ) Collect information about an individual directly from that individual, whenever practicable;
( 4 ) Inform each individual from whom information is collected of: ( i ) The legal authority that authorizes the Department to collect such information,
( ii ) The principal purposes for which the Department intends to use the information,
( iii ) The routine uses the Department may make of the information, and
( iv ) The practical and legal effects upon the individual of not furnishing the information;
( 5 ) Maintain all records which are used by the agency in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as to ensure fairness to the individual in the determination;
( 6 ) Maintain no record describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, unless: ( i ) The individual has volunteered such information for his own benefit,
( ii ) A statute expressly authorizes the Department to collect, maintain, use, or disseminate the information, or
( iii ) The individual's beliefs, activities, or membership are pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity;
( 7 ) Notify the head of the component of the existence or development of any system of records that has not been disclosed to the public;
( 8 ) Disclose no record to anyone, for any use, unless authorized by the Act;
( 9 ) Maintain and use records with care to prevent the inadvertent disclosure of a record to anyone; and
( 10 ) Notify the head of the component of any record that contains information that the Act or the foregoing provisions of this paragraph do not permit the Department to maintain.
#### § 784.154 Relationship to other operations as affecting exemption.

Employment in marketing, storing, distributing, and packing for shipment of the aquatic commodities described in section 13(b)(4) is, as such, exempted from the overtime pay provisions of the Act. This means that the employees actually employed in such operations on the named commodities are within the exemption without regard to the intimacy or remoteness of the relationship between their work and processing operations also performed on the commodities, so long as any prior processing has not rendered the commodity nonperishable (as in the case of a canned product) and therefore removed it from the category of marine products referred to by section 13(b)(4). If the commodity has previously been rendered nonperishable, the marketing, storing, distributing, or packing for shipment of it by an employee can come within the exemption only if the activity is one performed by his employer as an integrated part of a series of the named operations which commenced with operations on the perishable marine products to which section 13(b)(4) refers. Some examples of this situation are given in §§ 784.146 and 784.151.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 33799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-946, MM Docket No. 99-237; RM-9663]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Medina, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies a petition for rule making filed by 
Medina Radio Broadcasting Company requesting the allotment of Channel 
296A at Medina, Texas. See 64 FR 36324, July 6, 1999. This document in 
this proceeding questioned community status and requested commenting 
parties to present the Commission with information demonstrating 
community status. Based on the totality of evidence submitted, we do 
not believe that Medina qualifies as a community for allotment purposes 
and that it would not serve the public interest to make a channel 
allotment in response to Medina Radio's proposal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 99-237, adopted April 19, 2000, and released 
April 25, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, 
facsimile (202) 857-3805.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-13136 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Fact Finding With the Women's Bureau

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Fact Finding With the Women's Bureau : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 84*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5392,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT (11.2)

               THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                      (1)
              (All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                          Year Ended December 31
                                                       ----------------------------
                                                         1995      1994      1993
                                                       --------  --------  --------
<S>                                                    <C>       <C>       <C>
NET EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON AND COMMON
 EQUIVALENT SHARES                                     $349,972  $701,386  $124,166
                                                       ========  ========  ========
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING ON A
 FULLY DILUTED BASIS:
  Shares used in calculating primary earnings
   per share                                             55,293    62,555    59,593
 
  Additional dilutive effect of stock options after
   application of treasury stock method                       8       172        99
                                                       --------  --------  --------
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING ON A
 FULLY DILUTED BASIS                                     55,301    62,727    59,692
                                                       ========  ========  ========
FULLY DILUTED NET EARNINGS PER COMMON
 AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE                              $6.33    $11.18     $2.08
                                                       ========  ========  ========
</TABLE>
(1) This calculation is submitted in accordance with 17 CFR 229.601(b)(11)
although not required by APB Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of
less than 3%.

                                                                71
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                        MARQUETTE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

Subsidiaries:

The Company subsidiaries are listed below:

                                                    STATE OR COUNTRY
     NAME                                           OF ORGANIZATION
     ----                                           ---------------

Marquette Electronics Anesthesia
& Respiratory Care Corp.                              Missouri

Marquette Leasing, Inc.                               Wisconsin

Marquette International, Ltd.                         Virgin Islands

Marquette Hellige UK, Ltd.                            England

Marquette Hellige Italia, SRL                         Italy

Marquette Hellige S.A.S.                              France

Marquette Benelux n.v./s.a.                           Belgium

Marquette Hellige Espana, S.A.                        Spain

Marquette Medical Systems
 (Australia) PTY, Ltd.                                Australia

Corometrics Medical Systems, Inc.                     Delaware

Hellige Ges.m.b.H.                                    Austria

Marquette Hellige GmbH                                Germany

E For M Corporation                                   Delaware

Vari-X, Inc.                                          California
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 247 

Commending the University of Washington Men’s Crew, the 2007 

Intercollegiate Rowing Association Champions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2007 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself and Mrs. MURRAY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the University of Washington Men’s Crew, the 

2007 Intercollegiate Rowing Association Champions. 

Whereas crew is the oldest intercollegiate sport in the United 

States, dating back to 1852; 

Whereas the Intercollegiate Rowing Association Championship, which began in 1895, is the oldest college rowing 

championship in the United States and is one of the most 

prestigious championships in collegiate rowing; 

Whereas the University of Washington first attended the 

Intercollegiate Rowing Association Championship in the 

1913; 

Whereas the Washington Huskies Men’s Crew Team was the 

number 1 ranked team in the United States all season 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 247 ATS 

and entered the Intercollegiate Rowing Association 

Championships as the top seeded team; 

Whereas the University of Washington’s varsity eight, second 

varsity eight, and open four each won gold medals in 

their respective races, and the freshman eight took home 

the bronze medal; 

Whereas this is the 12th varsity eight title won by University 

of Washington at the Intercollegiate Rowing Association 

Championships, and the first such win by the Huskies 

since 1997; 

Whereas the Huskies also won the Ten Eyck Trophy for the 

first time since 1970 by winning the overall points championship; 

Whereas the entire University of Washington Men’s Crew 

Team should be commended for demonstrating determination, work ethic, attitude, and heart; and 

Whereas the members of the Men’s Crew Team have brought 

great honor to themselves, their families, the University 

of Washington, and the State of Washington: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the University of Washington 

3 Men’s Crew Team for winning the 2007 Intercolle4 giate Rowing Association Championship and acquir5 ing the Ten Eyck Trophy; and 

6 (2) recognizes the achievements of the rowers, 

7 coaches, and staff whose skill, discipline, and dedica8 tion allowed them to reach such heights. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Hillsborough

No. 6603

#### Virginia Ann Twardosky v. M. Edward Twardosky

August 27, 1973

*Sullivan, Gregg & Horton*and *J. Jefferson Davis (Mr. Davis*orally) for the jplaintiff.

*McDuffee & Clough (Mr. Joseph L. Clough*orally) for the defendant.

*439Grimes, J.

The question in this case is whether the rule of *Douglas v. Douglas,*109 N.H. 41, 242 A.2d 78 (1968), which prohibits retroactive modification of a property settlement decree, applies to the decree in this case with respect to the occupancy of the family home.

These parties were divorced in June 1969. The wife was awarded custody of the seven children. The family home, which was in the name of the wife, was made the property of both parties, the wife to have the right of possession until her remarriage or until the youngest child reaches the age of 18, whichever event occurred first. On the happening of either event, the real estate was to be sold and the proceeds divided 60 percent to the wife and 40 percent to the husband.

The husband now has legal custody of six of the seven children. He moved for a modification of the divorce decree seeking the right to possession of the real estate and to purchase his former wife’s share therein. This motion was denied, but the Court *(Loughlin,*J.) transferred the issue whether *Douglas v. Douglas,*109 N.H. 41, 242 A. 2d 78 (1968), “is apposite to the facts of this case”.

That part of the decree which in effect grants a 60 percent interest in the property to the wife is a property settlement and under *theDouglas v. Douglas*rule is not subject to modification. That part of the decree which related to the possession of the property and postponing its sale is of a different nature. Its purpose was to preserve the home for the children in the mother’s custody while she remained unmarried. As such, its modification is not prohibited by *Douglas v. Douglas supra.*

*Remanded.*

All concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 4.4(c)

                         HOLDINGS ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


                                         May 11, 1999


Reference is hereby made to the Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement,
dated May 11, 1999 (the "Agreement"), between Healthtrust, Inc.--The Hospital
Company ("Healthtrust") and the Initial Purchasers named therein and the
LifePoint Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 1999, between Healthtrust and
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. ("LifePoint").

LifePoint Hospitals Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings") hereby unconditionally and
irrevocably expressly  assumes, confirms and agrees to perform and observe as
the "Company" each and every of the covenants, agreements, terms, conditions,
obligations, appointments, duties, promises and liabilities of LifePoint under
the Agreement, and upon the Business being validly transferred to Holdings, the
assumption by Holdings of the indebtedness evidenced by the Securities and
LifePoint and Holdings executing and delivering this Holdings Assumption
Agreement, LifePoint shall automatically be fully, unconditionally and
irrevocably released of all covenants, agreements, terms, conditions,
obligations, appointment, duties, promises and liabilities under the Agreement.

Each of the undersigned hereby agrees to promptly execute and deliver any and
all further documents and take such further action as any other undersigned
party or the Representative may reasonably require to effect the purpose of this
Holdings Assumption Agreement.

This Holdings Assumption Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


                                       LIFEPOINT HOSPITAL, INC.


                                       By:  /s/  William F. Carpenter III
                                          ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  William F. Carpenter III
                                            Title:  Senior Vice President

                                       LIFEPOINT  HOSPITALS HOLDINGS,
                                        INC.


                                       By:  /s/  Kenneth C. Donahey
                                          ---------------------------------
                                             Name:  Kenneth C. Donahey
                                             Title:  Senior Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50485-50486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]


Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel of the Medical Devices 
Advisory Committee; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an amendment 
to the notice of meeting of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel 
of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee. This meeting was announced 
in the Federal Register of July 14, 2011 (76 FR 41507). The amendment 
is being made to reflect a change in the Procedure portion of the 
document. There are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shanika Craig, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1613, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6639, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#792a111817101218573a0b18101e391f1d185711110a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d4e757c7374767c335e6f7c747a5d7b797c3375756e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 
1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), and follow 
the prompts to the desired center or product area. Please call the 
Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 14, 2011, 
FDA announced that a meeting of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices 
Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee would be held on 
September 8 and 9, 2011. On page 41508, in the first column, the 
Procedure section is changed to add, directly after the first full 
paragraph, the following paragraph:
    FDA will work with the manufacturers of surgical mesh products who 
wish to make presentations to ensure that adequate time, separate from 
the 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. time slots from the general open public hearing, 
is provided. Manufacturers interested in making formal presentations to 
the committee should notify the contact person on or

[[Page 50486]]

before August 22, 2011. Manufacturers with common interest are urged to 
coordinate their oral presentations.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

    Dated: August 9, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20644 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Commerce invites U.S. companies to participate in the following overseas trade missions that they also explain at the following website:                         *http://www.ita.doc.gov/​doctm.*                         For a comprehensive description of the trade mission, obtain a copy of the mission statement from the project officer listed below. The recruitment and selection of private sector participants will be conducted according to the Statement of Policy Governing Department of Commerce Overseas Trade Missions announced by Secretary Daley on March 3, 1997.                    

Telecommunications Matchmaker

South East Asia

November 13-17, 2000

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Molly Costa at the Department of Commerce in Washington, DC, Telephone number: (202) 482-0692 or Fax: (202) 482-0178.

John Klingelhut,

Director, Office of Public and Private Initiatives.

[FR Doc. 00-13502  Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-FP-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40095 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v. SECUNDINO MATA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-402-01

-------------------- February 14, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Secundino Mata, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mata has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.