alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 810.100 Scope and purpose of this subpart. ( a ) Section 202A(e) of the USMCA Implementation Act authorizes the Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to participate in a verification of whether covered vehicle production complies with the high-wage components of the LVC requirements set forth in Article 7 of the Automotive Appendix or, if the producer is subject to the alternative staging regime, under Articles 7 and 8 of the Automotive Appendix. This subpart addresses calculation of the high-wage material and manufacturing expenditures component of the LVC (referred to in the Uniform Regulations as high-wage material and labor expenditures).
( b ) The regulations in this subpart describe how producers can meet the high-wage-related aspect of the material and manufacturing expenditures component, which concerns whether workers engaged in direct production work at a plant or facility included in a producer's material and manufacturing expenditures calculation earn an average hourly base wage rate of at least US$16 per hour. All other aspects of material and manufacturing expenditures are addressed in the Uniform Regulations and regulations and/or guidance issued by CBP or other federal agencies.
#### § 780.910 Engagement in transportation and preparation.

Since transportation and preparation for transportation are both exempt activities, an employee who engages in both is performing exempt work. In referring to “the transportation and preparation for transportation” of the fruits or vegetables, the statute recognizes the two activities as interrelated parts of the single task of moving the commodities from the farm to the designated points. Accordingly, the word “and” between the words “transportation” and “preparation” is not considered to require that any employee be employed in both parts of the task in order to be exempt. The exemption may apply to an employee engaged either in transporting or preparing the commodities for transportation if he otherwise qualifies under section 13(b)(16).
EXHIBIT 10.29  SEVERANCE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT  Madison Gas and Electric Company (the Company) and (the Employee) entered into a Severance Agreement (the Agreement), dated , pursuant to which Employee is entitled to certain severance payments and benefits under specified circumstances following Employees separation from service with the Company.  For good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2010, as follows: 1. Section 3(b) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety, and subsection (c) of Section 3 is relettered subsection (b) accordingly. 2. Section 4 of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 4. Limitation on Payments.  Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that Employee becomes entitled to payments or benefits under this Agreement and the payments or benefits payable to Employee under this Agreement, when combined with other payments and benefits received or to be received by the Employee from the Company or any corporation affiliated with the Company within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code, in the opinion of the Company, would constitute parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(2) of the Code, then the amounts payable to Employee under this Agreement shall be reduced to an amount, the present value of which (when combined with the present value of any other payments or benefits otherwise received or to be received by Employee from the Company (or any corporation affiliated with the Company within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code) that would be deemed parachute payments) is equal to 2.99 times the base amount within the meaning Section 280G(b)(3). 3. Section 12(b) is amended by deleting the words or provide any benefit to Employee and Employee's dependents or other beneficiaries, as the case may be, under paragraphs (a) and (b) of Section 3, the Company shall pay all amounts, and provide all benefits, to Employee and Employee's dependents or other beneficiaries, as the case may be, that the Company would be required to pay or provide pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of Section 3 and inserting in lieu thereof the following words: under Section 3(a), the Company shall pay all amounts that the Company would be required to pay pursuant to Section 3(a)   1     ACCEPTED AND AGREED to this day of February, 2011.   MADISON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMPLOYEE by:    Date     2
### J5**~** 

### .A-bel. AcosL**CJe.rl~**

. ) Q.ouft" of CnMtV\o.{_**/l_,...p-e.cJ~** . ''T' MW Ol 2D15



## b

e..o_.s:-**~I** I 1 1\b

., ""\**~** Ac()sta,**Ct~rk** 

### ""I l).)o..-S 

### wo-nJ.-u-'"'1' ,f**~-u-~s ~c~** **~ ~** **~~** crv-..-**~e.--** a.IDove.. nvyvJoue_J_**~r-vt ~(**  

## ·**f.~ ~~\**  

### L lof-t- 

### -fo 

### G_pr.. L l sfl-

, .).o 15

1 - l wo.....s 

### je-n-e_**--F-~. ~~**  5 uN0& 

## fo_**~&~3o (Y)~\(::o.J.._**  _**pu--oc_~clu~s,** 

### Whv--v



### fhc-.:t**~~p<€/Yis** 

### ) &f\ e.-'5**m~L** 

### \ s fowos-J--e..Jl

· 

### -fo --J-1rle..**~l**



## of**Ufl'A-i~** 

### he_**w~k** 

### +o &oc-'""-0 h,

### ~.jour~~ 

## -G,,**-~~ 0\~tc..o..l**  Fc...e&Jrc...**~** l'he.re

..**.f~.e_** 

## } th-e- (Yic.(.AJ 

# rs**JJ~--wt** 

### ,**J~~d, posst\of~**  

### [cd.

_ 

### ---rh-e.-**re.eLb~** 

### -fk,

s is 

### ee....r-h"'**~** 

### , 0 1e..cc:w s e.. Y 1

Y'A-..

### ~-e.r~ 

## d WV' 

### Jc.ij""**~e._** 

### A. E.

. 

### D. 

# r. It )**~** J. rt \ -so \{ \ +oJ__ 

## i+-d' -=L

### \-<~~**~** lJJ1 

### tk

### ~e....**-hvvH~-** e.x_ptre.d.

### ·!hv~ {>ce:_

·"'-.r oe..ul 

## +o**~~** ,_p_

### ~**o..-~ w~~** **»~ ~** 



### t':;:Q**~Pr** 

# ct**J\)~** 

## '"0**~"-** CA. 

## f;,re_-

M

### ~"""' .,_J._

### ~s . 

### Or



## J**~** !\'"-ieee.

### iJ.-!CL~**s~** 

## +o M<::__ OV\_

### ~ec· 

## cJ:o<--L-**tv\~** OV\ -e.&- 

### Jo:t-c:. 'S**~ ~**  &.v.r-**~-etp** 1"-.- 

## fl,

:5**~-e.** IS ((e-eQ-\ 

## 3-**~v--e..-u~** ..**$.\(\C0\{'~-,**

## -{)~~
#### § 794.105 Other requirements for exemption.

The limited overtime pay exemption provided by section 7(b)(3) applies to any employee compensated in accordance with its terms who is “employed * * * by an * * * enterprise * * * engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products” as explained in §§ 794.103 through 794.104 if the enterprise which employs him meets all of the following requirements: (a) It is a “local” enterprise; (b) it is “independently owned and controlled”; (c) it has an annual gross volume of sales of less than $1 million exclusive of excise taxes; (d) it makes more than 75 percent of its annual dollar volume of sales within the State in which it is located; and (e) not more than 25 percent of such annual dollar volume of sales is to customers who are engaged in the bulk distribution of petroleum products for resale. In order to determine whether all these requirements are met, it is necessary to know what constitutes the “enterprise” to which reference is made, the meaning of “the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products” in which engagement is required as a prerequisite to exemption, what is meant by a “local” enterprise and what characterizes it as “independently owned and controlled”, and the criteria for application of the dollar volume tests. These matters will be discussed in some detail in the sections following.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-30490 

_____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

DON LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CR-168-T-2)

______________________________________________________

April 13, 1998

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

In this direct criminal appeal, Lewis raises three issues:

1. Whether the district court erred in denying Lewis’s

motion to suppress evidence; 

2. Whether the district court abused its discretion in

qualifying Henry Richardson as an expert in identifying

drug ledgers;

3. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support

Lewis’s conviction for conspiracy.
2

After hearing oral argument and reviewing the briefs of the

parties and pertinent portions of the record, we are satisfied that

the district court committed no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women Workers in Flint, Mich.

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women Workers in Flint, Mich. : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 67*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1929,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5376,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/15

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.56 N 76.20 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001074544
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST VI


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### § 778.103 The workweek as the basis for applying section 7(a).

If in any workweek an employee is covered by the Act and is not exempt from its overtime pay requirements, the employer must total all the hours worked by the employee for him in that workweek (even though two or more unrelated job assignments may have been performed), and pay overtime compensation for each hour worked in excess of the maximum hours applicable under section 7(a) of the Act. In the case of an employee employed jointly by two or more employers (see part 791 of this chapter), all hours worked by the employee for such employers during the workweek must be totaled in determining the number of hours to be compensated in accordance with section 7(a). The principles for determining what hours are hours worked within the meaning of the Act are discussed in part 785 of this chapter.
#### In the Matter of Bruno Brigandi, Appellant, v Finance Administrator et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 25, 1996;

decided May 7, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal, treated as a motion for reargument of appellant’s motion for leave to appeal which was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on July 6,1995, dismissed as untimely *(see,*22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). *[See,*86 NY2d 773.]
#### § 785.41 Work performed while traveling.

Any work which an employee is required to perform while traveling must, of course, be counted as hours worked. An employee who drives a truck, bus, automobile, boat or airplane, or an employee who is required to ride therein as an assistant or helper, is working while riding, except during bona fide meal periods or when he is permitted to sleep in adequate facilities furnished by the employer.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 36 

Honoring women’s health advocate Cynthia Boles Dailard. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2007 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mrs. CLINTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring women’s health advocate Cynthia Boles Dailard. 

Whereas women’s health advocate Cynthia Boles Dailard was 

born on February 29, 1968 and grew up in Syosset, New 

York; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard excelled as a student both at Harvard University, from which she graduated cum laude 

with a bachelor’s degree in English in 1990, and at the 

University of California at Berkeley’s Boalt Hall School 

of Law, from which she graduated in 1994; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard entered the nonprofit sector upon 

graduating from law school, receiving a year-long fellowship at the National Women’s Law Center in Washington, D.C.; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard worked as legislative assistant and 

counsel for Senator Olympia J. Snowe, bringing to bear 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 36 IS 

her keen intelligence, vision, energy, expertise, and talent 

in service to the Nation and the women of the United 

States; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard worked as associate director for domestic policy for President William J. Clinton; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard worked for 8 years for the 

Guttmacher Institute, a respected public policy think 

tank devoted to women’s health; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard spearheaded the Guttmacher Institute’s policy work on issues related to domestic family 

planning programs and sex education; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard was a member of the National 

Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association 

Board of Directors; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard spoke and wrote prolifically on 

matters including family planning, adolescent sexual behavior, and insurance coverage for contraception; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard worked in a bipartisan fashion with 

elected officials and their staffs to promote the health 

and well-being of women and families; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard was a gifted and passionate voice 

within the women’s health community; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard was driven by an abiding concern 

for human relationships and the health and well-being of 

all individuals; 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard has left a thoughtful and enduring 

mark on women’s health policy and will remain a role 

model for advocates by virtue of her wisdom, character, 

commitment, and scholarship; and 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•SRES 36 IS 

Whereas Cynthia Dailard is survived by her husband Scott 

and her daughters Miranda and Julia: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) notes with deep sorrow the death of Cynthia 

3 Boles Dailard on December 24, 2006; 

4 (2) extends its heartfelt sympathy to Scott, Mi5 randa, and Julia Dailard; and 

6 (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans7 mit a copy of this resolution to the family of Cynthia 

8 Boles Dailard. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: MEDIA QUEUE, LLC, Appellant

______________________

2014

- 1794

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,469.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OHN N ICHOLAS G ROSS , Law Office of J. Nicholas Gross, Berkeley, CA, argued for appellant.

J OSEPH M ATAL , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by J OSEPH G ERARD P ICCOLO

, N ATHAN K. K ELLEY

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, L OURIE and

T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23.a

Consent of independent public accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement File Nos. 33-40356, 33-52635, 33-58409, 333-25569, 333-80945, 333-32416, 333-56806, 33-40357, 333-25623, 333-56808, 33-52637, 33-58407, 333-61488, 333-61490, 333-37619,
333-66169, 333-80943, 333-88669, 333-94059, 333-37898, 333-37900, 333-40354, 333-42642, 333-47656, 333-47590, 333-56356, 333-56418, 33-59445, 333-32023, and 333-94977.

/s/
Arthur Andersen LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota,
January 14, 2002

---
#### § 779.226 Exception for an independently owned retail or service establishment under certain franchise and other arrangements.

While certain franchise and other arrangements may operate to bring the one to whom the franchise is granted into another enterprise (see § 779.232), section 3(r) contains a specific exception for certain arrangements entered into by a retail or service establishment which is under independent ownership. The specific exception in section 3(r) reads as follows:

*Provided,* That, within the meaning of this subsection, a retail or service establishment which is under independent ownership shall not be deemed to be so operated or controlled as to be other than a separate and distinct enterprise by reason of any arrangement, which includes, but is not necessarily limited to, an agreement, (1) that it will sell, or sell only, certain goods specified by a particular manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser, (2) that it will join with other such establishments in the same industry for the purpose of collective purchasing, or (3) that it will have the exclusive right to sell the goods or use the brand name of a manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser within a specified area, or by reason of the fact that it occupies premises leased to it by a person who also leases premises to other retail or service establishments.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Henry William Grotewold v. Janet Kay Meyer

Appellate case number: 01-13-00875-CV

Trial court case number: 2004-40933

Trial court: 257th District Court of Harris County

The District Court Clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record in this Court 

that contains the following documents:

1. “Henry William Grotewold’s Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship”; filed 

March 8, 2012; image number 53206961.

2. “Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship”; filed November 6, 2012; image 

number 53851576.

3. “Motion for Psychological Examination and Evaluation of Janet Meyers, Motion 

for Continuance and Motion for Sanctions”; filed July 22, 2013; image number 

58674962.

4. “First Amended Counterpetition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship”; filed July 

22, 2013; image number 58674957.

5. Letter; filed September 13, 2013; image number 58674951.

Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The supplemental clerk’s record is to be filed in this Court by 

December 12, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting individually

Date: December 2, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Capital Solutions I, Inc. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity as an
officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                                     Christopher Astrom
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     September 14, 2004