alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      I, John B. Dicus, certify that:

- I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Capitol Federal Financial;  
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

- The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial report, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 4, 2004

      

                                                                                            By:/s/ John B. Dicus                                     

                                                                                                 John B. Dicus, President and                                                                                               Chief Executive Officer
#### § 789.5 “* * * acquired * * * in good faith * * * for value without notice * * *.”

Section 12(a) and section 15(a)(1) of the Act provide that a purchaser must acquire the goods in good faith in reliance on the specified written assurance in order to be accorded the statutory protection.

The legislative history of the amendments indicates that a purchaser's good faith is not to be determined merely from the actual state of his mind but that good faith also depends upon an objective test—that of what a “reasonable, prudent man, acting with due diligence, would have done in the circumstances.” This good faith requirement is, in the words of the House Managers, “comparable to similar requirements imposed on purchasers in other fields of law.” The final determination of what will amount to good faith can be made only upon the basis of the pertinent facts in each situation.

It is clear, however, that good faith as used in the Act, not only requires honesty of intention but also that a purchaser must not know, have reason to know, or have knowledge of circumstances which ought to put him on inquiry that the goods in question were produced in violation of any of the provisions of the Act referred to in sections 12(a) and 15(a)(1).

These good faith provisions are reinforced by the requirement in sections 12(a) and 15(a)(1) that the purchaser must also acquire his goods “for value without notice” of an applicable violation of the Act.

To illustrate the application of the above principles, let us assume that a purchaser of goods for value acquires them in reliance upon a written assurance from the producer, manufacturer, or dealer that the particular goods were produced in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Act, and that the form and content of the assurance is sufficient to meet the conditions of sections 12 and 15(a)(1) of the Act. If a reasonable, prudent man in the purchaser's position, acting with the diligence, would have no reason to question the truth of the assurance that the applicable requirements has been complied with, the purchaser's reliance on such written assurance would be considered to be in good faith and without notice of any violation, and the purchaser would be protected in the event that violations of the child-labor or the wage-hour standards of the Act had actually occurred in the production of such goods by the vendor or by prior producers of the goods. In such circumstances, the purchaser's protection would not be contingent on his securing separate written assurances from the prior producers or on his assuring himself that his vendor had secured specific guarantees from them with respect to compliance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001092479
<NAME> TRIAD HOSPITALS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              97
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      281
<ALLOWANCES>                                       145
<INVENTORY>                                         32
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   363
<PP&E>                                           1,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                     533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              131
<BONDS>                                            550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,318
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   312
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     15
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (7)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  8
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         8
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE - SFAS NO 128 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LUKENS INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 29, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                                    9,080
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           124,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                              7,681
<INVENTORY>                                             158,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        298,144
<PP&E>                                                  956,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                          431,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          915,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   188,477
<BONDS>                                                 257,184
<COMMON>                                                    158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    14,191
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                              238,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            915,153
<SALES>                                                 248,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        248,118
<CGS>                                                   233,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           233,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          1,637
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        4,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (2,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (856)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (1,978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (1,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
#### JEFFREY DAVIS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 18782)

Landau, Hennessy and Mihalakos, Js.

Submitted on briefs December 15, 1999

officially released January 18, 2000

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
ex_10-b.htm


Exhibit 10(b)









Amendment to Option Grants







Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings assigned to such terms under the Company’s equity incentive plan under which the Option was granted or in the relevant award agreement, as applicable.  The following provision shall be deemed to be incorporated into each relevant outstanding stock option award agreement, effective as of April 28, 2012:








	
  

	
·

	
Notwithstanding the preceding terms of this Agreement regarding exercisability of the Option, in the event of the Participant’s termination of employment or services with the Company and its Subsidiaries on or after April 28, 2012 due to the Participant’s death, Disability or Qualified Retirement, the Option, to the extent not previously exercised, shall remain exercisable until the Option Termination Date and shall then terminate together with all other rights under this Agreement.  As used herein, the term “Qualified Retirement” means the Participant’s termination of employment or services with the Company and its Subsidiaries at or after reaching age 65 with at least 10 years of Service.
An official website of the United States government          

Here’s how you know

**Official websites use .gov**A              **.gov** website belongs to an official government              organization in the United States.            

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A              **lock** (              LockLocked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.            

Skip to contentSkip to navigation

- Home
- About +   - Spread the Word
- Focus Areas +   - Accessible, Affordable Housing
  - Fair Housing
  - Homelessness
  - Supportive Services
  - Transitions Out of Institutions
  - Traumatic Brain Injury
  - Tribal Housing
- Tools +   - Data & Reports
  - Directories
  - Funding & Programs
  - Models
  - Terms & Acronyms
  - Tools & Toolkits
  - Training & Education
- What's New

I need housing or services help

# Office Hour Materials: Building and Sustaining Home Modification Collaborations: Strategies for Your Community

Home modification--changing the home environment to increase safety and support--can promote independence and community participation. Funding for and delivering these services often entail partnerships across the aging, disability, and housing sectors. This July 6. 2022, Housing and Services Resource Center (HSRC) office hour explored the many opportunities to use cross-sector collaboration to expand access to home modification. Staff from the University of Southern California Leonard Davis School of Gerontology were "in the office" to answer questions and offer other solutions. The office hour is a companion to the June 9, 2022, HSRC webinar, Addressing Housing Accessibility through Cross-Sector Partnerships: A Closer Look at Home Modification Collaborations at Work.
                  - Webinar recording
                  - Slides
                  - Transcript
                  - Materials from a companion webinar on June 9, 2022

*Last modified on 01/19/2023*

**      Back to Top    

## 

The Housing and Services Resource Center is part of an interagency initiative to streamline and expand access to affordable, accessible housing and the critical services that make community living possible.

 

## Site Support

-  Accessibility 
-  Disclaimers 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Sitemap 
-  Viewers & Players 

## Helpful Sites

-  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
-  No Fear Act 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

## Sign up for email

Subscribe * *

**  Share on Other Platforms

An official website of the Administration for Community Living, an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
##### 



(1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ James L. HambrickJames L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 28, 2006
   (1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ Charles P. Cooley

Charles P. CooleyChief Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2006
#### § 500.225 Notice of docketing.

The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall promptly notify the parties of the docketing of each matter.
#### Purandat Chalu et al., Respondents, v Tov-Le Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 26, 1996;

decided October 15, 1996

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. *[See,*88 NY2d 959.] Cross motion for sanctions denied.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 383 

Honoring and recognizing the achievements of Carl Stokes, the first AfricanAmerican mayor of a major American city, in the 40th year since 

his election as Mayor of Cleveland, Ohio. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2007 

Mr. REID (for Mr. OBAMA (for himself, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. VOINOVICH)) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring and recognizing the achievements of Carl Stokes, 

the first African-American mayor of a major American 

city, in the 40th year since his election as Mayor of 

Cleveland, Ohio. 

Whereas Carl Stokes was a pioneer in cultivating a positive 

climate for African-Americans to seek election to public 

office and made great strides toward improving race relations in a tumultuous period of United States history; 

Whereas Carl Stokes was born on June 27, 1927, in Cleveland, Ohio, to Charles and Louise Stokes; 

Whereas Carl Stokes rose from poverty in Outhwaite Homes, 

Cleveland’s first federally funded housing project for the 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

•SRES 383 IS 

poor, to be elected to the highest political office in Cleveland; 

Whereas Carl Stokes earned his bachelor’s degree from the 

University of Minnesota in 1954 and graduated from the 

Cleveland-Marshall College of Law in 1956, and was admitted to the Ohio State Bar in 1957; 

Whereas, in 1962, Carl Stokes was elected to the Ohio General Assembly and served 3 terms as the first AfricanAmerican Democrat to serve from Cuyahoga County; 

Whereas, in 1967, relying on his ability to mobilize support 

that transcended racial divides, Carl Stokes was elected 

Mayor of Cleveland and became the first African-American mayor of a major American city; 

Whereas, after declining to run for a 3rd term as Mayor of 

Cleveland, Carl Stokes became the first African-American 

to appear daily as an anchorman on a New York City television outlet, WNBC–TV; 

Whereas Carl Stokes served as a municipal judge in Cleveland from 1983 to 1994, completing a political career encompassing each branch of government; and 

Whereas Carl Stokes maintained his dedication to public 

service throughout his life, serving as Ambassador to the 

Seychelles and representing the White House on numerous goodwill trips abroad until his death in 1996: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the pioneering career of Carl 

3 Stokes, who helped expand political opportunity for 

4 minorities by becoming the first African-American 

5 mayor of a major American city; and 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
3 

•SRES 383 IS 

1 (2) commemorates the 40th anniversary of the 

2 election of Carl Stokes as the Mayor of Cleveland 

3 and the first African-American mayor of a major 

4 American city, one of the most significant events in 

5 the American Civil Rights movement. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
Exhibit 10.12 - May 30, 2012 Second Amendment to Cerficate of
Incorporation

CERTIFICATE OF SECOND AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION OF PYROTEC, INC.

The corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby
certify:

FIRST: That a meeting of the shareholders holding a majority
of voting shares consented in writing in lieu of a shareholder
meeting as provided for under Article I, Section 1.1 of the
corporation's Bylaws, and approved the following resolution:

Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation dated
October 21, 2011, and as amended on April 11, 2012, shall be as
follows:

"FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the
corporation is authorized to issue is 200,000,000 shares of
common stock having a ($0.0001) par value and 10,000,000 shares
of preferred stock having a ($0.0001) par value."

SECOND: That a meeting of the shareholders holding a majority
of voting shares consented in writing in lieu of a shareholder
meeting as provided for under Article I, Section 1.1 of the
corporation's Bylaws, and approved the following resolutions:

Article SEVENTH of the Certificate of Incorporation dated
October 21, 2011, and as amended on April 11, 2012, shall be as
follows:

"SEVENTH: The name and address of the director of the
corporation is Jon Dyer c/o PyroTec, Inc., 125E Wappoo Creek
Drive, Suite 202A, Charleston, South Carolina 29412."

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to Delaware General
Corporation Laws Section 222, a consent in writing, setting forth
the action so taken, was signed by the holders of outstanding
stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would
be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting in
which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present.

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed this 30th day of May, 2012.

By: /s/ John Burns

Name: John Burns



Title: President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM ANTHONY BULLOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-00-264, CA-01-1074-1)

Submitted: November 12, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Anthony Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM

William A. Bullock seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Bullock

also moves this court to hear his appeal en banc under Fed. R. App.

P. 35. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final

order in a proceeding under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion

on the merits, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless

the appellant can make “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have

reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the

district court that Bullock has not made the requisite showing.

See United States v. Bullock, Nos. CR-00-264; CA-01-1074-1

(M.D.N.C. May 28, 2002). As no active member of the court has voted

to grant hearing en banc, it is denied. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED