alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Annual Report") of EME Homer
City Generation L.P. (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his knowledge and belief, that:

| |  | /s/Guy F. GorneyGuy F. Gorney
Director and President
Mission Energy Westside, Inc.,
as General Partner             
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/W. James ScilacciW. James Scilacci
Director and Vice President
Mission Energy Westside, Inc.,
as General Partner

This
statement accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EME Homer City Generation L.P. and will be retained by EME Homer City Generation L.P. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
(77 South. 1004)

#### NEESE v. STATE.

(4 Div. 545.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Covington County;’ A. B. Poster, Judge. Pate Neese was convicted of manslaughter, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

P. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Emmett S. Thigpen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, from which judgment of conviction this appeal is taken. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper, from which it appears that the proceedings in the court below were regular and free from error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wizzard Software Corporation
  (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, President, CEO and
  Treasurer and Gordon Berry, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
  Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
  of the Registrant.


Dated: May 15, 2006      Signature:   /s/ Christopher J. Spencer
                                     --------------------------
                                     Christopher J. Spencer
                                     President, CEO and Treasurer

Dated: May 15, 2006      Signature:   /s/ Gordon Berry
                                     --------------------------
                                     Gordon Berry
                                     Acting Chief Financial
                                     Officer
University of North Carolina Asheville 

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

1 of 2

Goals

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Develop or expand capacity to 

significantly increase the number of 

older adults and adults with disabilities, 

particularly those in underserved 

areas/populations, who participate in 

evidence-based chronic disease selfmanagement education and selfmanagement support programs to 

empower them to better manage their 

chronic conditions.

• Goal 2: Enhance the sustainability of 

evidence-based chronic disease selfmanagement education and selfmanagement support programs 

through the implementation of robust 

sustainability strategies.

Strategies and Activities

The North Carolina Center for Health and 

Wellness (NCCHW) at the University of North 

Carolina Asheville and its partners will: 

• Support key partner Area Agencies on 

Aging (AAAs) in North Carolina to 

implement expansion of CDSME 

programs, specifically Chronic Pain Self 

Management Program, by leveraging 

referral pathways from other programs 

and systems of care. 

• Expand partnership with key partner 

AAA to implement the new supportive 

program, Program to Encourage Active 

and Rewarding Lives (PEARLS), to 

improve mental health of participants.

• Assist AAAs to train staff for CDSME 

expansion and PEARLS program needs.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Pain Self-Management Program 

(CPSMP)

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program (CDSMP)

• Diabetes Self-Management Program 

(DSMP)

• Program to Encourage Active and 

Rewarding Lives (PEARLs)
2 of 2

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, NCCHW will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• North Carolina Division of Aging and

Adult Services

• Centralina Area Agency on Aging

• High Country Area Agency on Aging

• Land of Sky Area Agency on Aging

• Southwestern Commission Area Agency 

on Aging

• Triangle J Area Agency on Aging

• Upper Coastal Plains Area Agency on 

Aging

• Western Piedmont Area Agency on 

Aging

Anticipated Results

NCCHW and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Reach 1,200 participants with 900 

completers in CDSMP.

• Reach 500 participants with 375 

completers in DSMP.

• Reach 500 participants with 375 

completers in CPSMP.

• Reach 205 participants with 154 

completers in PEARLS.

• Improve PEARLS participants selfreported scores of depression 

symptoms by 10%. 

Contact:

Natasha Vos

North Carolina Center for Health and Wellness

nvos@unca.edu

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
AIDD Developmental Disabilities Councils (DDC) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2016 Annual Allocation

2/3/2016

State/Territory

AIDD 

Developmental 

Disabilities 

Councils (DDC)

Alabama $1,294,230

Alaska $487,511

Arizona $1,415,169

Arkansas $772,804

California $6,543,380

Colorado $882,984

Connecticut $688,823

Delaware $487,511

District of Columbia $487,511

Florida $3,664,684

Georgia $2,070,716

Hawaii $487,511

Idaho $487,511

Illinois $2,624,831

Indiana $1,488,546

Iowa $774,177

Kansas $614,589

Kentucky $1,201,176

Louisiana $1,375,723

Maine $487,511

Maryland $1,008,160

Massachusetts $1,365,884

Michigan $2,543,752

Minnesota $1,025,295

Mississippi $914,238

Missouri $1,367,975

Montana $487,511

Nebraska $487,511

Nevada $541,498

New Hampshire $487,511

New Jersey $1,553,320

New Mexico $490,241

New York $4,101,074

North Carolina $2,020,953

North Dakota $487,511

Ohio $2,846,721

Oklahoma $897,250

Oregon $781,292

Pennsylvania $3,026,521

Rhode Island $487,511

South Carolina $1,097,001

South Dakota $487,511

Tennessee $1,461,395

Texas $4,813,917

Utah $635,274

Vermont $487,511

Virginia $1,501,929

Washington $1,170,579

West Virginia $739,342

Wisconsin $1,311,944

Wyoming $487,511

American Samoa $253,882

Guam $253,882

Northern Mariana Islands $253,882

Puerto Rico $2,506,931

Virgin Islands $253,882

TOTAL $72,975,000
#### DAVID G. HUNTER ET AL. *v.*ROGER JENNINGS

(AC 18597)

Foti, Laveiy and Schaller, Js.

Argued February 28

officially released March 14, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### § 501.8 Accuracy of information, statements, and data.

Information, statements, and data submitted in compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1188 or this part are subject to 18 U.S.C. 1001, which provides, with regard to statements or entries generally, that whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact by any trick, scheme, or device, or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security Access Control Systems.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control Systems.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held September 15, 2011, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESS:

 The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street, NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street, NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 224, Airport Security Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

## Agenda

### September 15, 2011

    - Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks;
    - Review/Approve Summary—Seventh Meeting;
    - Proposed Structure Overview;
    - Sub Section Workgroup Reports;
    - Document Structure Finalization Scheduling;
    - Time and Place of Next Meeting;
    - Any Other Business;
    - Adjourn.

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 9, 2011.

Robert L. Bostiga,

RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 2011-20746 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.219 Pequonnock River. ( a ) The draw of the Stratford Avenue Bridge at mile 0.1, at Bridgeport, shall open on signal; except that, from 6:45 a.m. to 7:15 a.m., 7:45 a.m. to 8:15 a.m., 11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., and 4:30 p.m. to 6:10 p.m., the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic. From December 1 through March 31, from 8 p.m. to 4 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least a six-hour notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( b ) The draw of the Metro-North Peck Bridge at mile 0.3, at Bridgeport shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) The draw shall open on signal between 5:45 a.m. to 9 p.m. if at least four hours advance notice is given; except that, from 5:45 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., and 4 p.m. to 8 p.m., Monday through Friday excluding holidays, the draw need not open for the passage of vessel traffic unless an emergency exists.
( 2 ) From 9 p.m. to 5:45 a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at least an eight hour notice is given.
( 3 ) A delay in opening the draw not to exceed 15 minutes may occur when a train scheduled to cross the bridge without stopping has entered the drawbridge block.
( 4 ) Requests for bridge openings may be made by calling the telephone number posted at the bridge.
[USCG-2010-0787, 75 FR 55477, Sept. 13, 2010, as amended by USCG-2017-0750, 83 FR 3963, Jan. 29, 2018; USCG-2023-0175, 88 FR 56471, Aug. 18, 2023]
§ 110.220 Pacific Ocean at San Nicolas Island, Calif.; restricted anchorage areas. ( a ) *The restricted area.* All waters within one-quarter nautical mile from the shoreline or manmade structures including mooring buoys, piers and jetties on the easterly end of San Nicolas Island between a point on the northeast shore at latitude 33°14′32′′ N, longitude 119°26′41′′ W and a point on the southeast shore at latitude 33°13′08′′ N, longitude 119°27′06′′ W.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Except in an emergency, no vessel shall enter into or anchor in this restricted area without permission from the Commanding Officer, Naval Base Ventura County. Cargo and supply vessels or barges destined for San Nicolas Island may anchor in the area for unloading or loading.
( 2 ) Each person in a restricted anchorage shall obey the order or direction of the Commanding Officer, Naval Base Ventura County, Coast Guard Eleventh District Commander, or Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Los Angeles-Long Beach, when issued to carry out this section.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The Coast Guard may be assisted in enforcing this rule by other Federal, state, or local agencies.
[USCG-2012-0967, 78 FR 67303, Nov. 12, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,016]


Deluxe Corporation, Financial Services Division, Springfield, 
Massachusetts; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Delux Corporation, Financial 
Services Division, Springfield, Massachusetts. The application 
contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly 
on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

TA-W-37,106; Deluxe Corporation, Financial Services Division, 
Springfield, Massachusetts (May 23, 2000).


    Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of May 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-13757 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Specimen of Stock Certificate evidencing shares of Common Stock



 Exhibit 4.1 

	
	





  

Exhibit 4.1 
 See Legends on Reverse 
 Incorporated Under the
Laws of the State of Delaware 
 KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

This Certifies that <<Stockholder>> is the registered holder of <<SharesText>>
(<<SharesNo>>) Shares of Common Stock transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this
<<Day>> day of <<Month>> A.D. <<YEAR>>. 
 Secretary or Assistant Secretary

 President or Vice President 
 COMMON 







 



 
  
 THE SHARES
REPRESENTED HEREBY MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, TRANSFERRED, ENCUMBERED OR IN ANY MANNER DISPOSED OF, EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF A WRITTEN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF THE SHARES (OR THE PREDECESSOR IN
INTEREST TO THE SHARES). SUCH AGREEMENT GRANTS TO THE COMPANY CERTAIN RIGHTS OF FIRST REFUSAL UPON AN ATTEMPTED TRANSFER OF THE SHARES. THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY WILL UPON WRITTEN REQUEST FURNISH A COPY OF SUCH AGREEMENT TO THE HOLDER HEREOF
WITHOUT CHARGE. 
 THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION THEREOF UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY AND ITS COUNSEL, THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED. 

For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated 20 
 In presence of 
 NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Argued and submitted September 4,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 30, 1992,

reconsideration denied June 16,

petition for review pending 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Bruce L. Hirschkorn, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Prosser, Inc., *Petitioners, v.*Bruce L. HIRSCHKORN, *Respondent.*

(90-20179; CA A72741)

844 P2d 262

Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Darrell E. Bewley, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Vick and Gutzler, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari,*117 Or App 409, 844 P2d 258 (1992).
§ 785.22 Duty of 24 hours or more. ( a ) *General.* Where an employee is required to be on duty for 24 hours or more, the employer and the employee may agree to exclude bona fide meal periods and a bona fide regularly scheduled sleeping period of not more than 8 hours from hours worked, provided adequate sleeping facilities are furnished by the employer and the employee can usually enjoy an uninterrupted night's sleep. If sleeping period is of more than 8 hours, only 8 hours will be credited. Where no expressed or implied agreement to the contrary is present, the 8 hours of sleeping time and lunch periods constitute hours worked. (*Armour* v. *Wantock,* 323 U.S. 126 (1944); *Skidmore* v. *Swift,* 323 U.S. 134 (1944); *General Electric Co.* v. *Porter,* 208 F. 2d 805 (C.A. 9, 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951, 975 (1954); *Bowers* v. *Remington Rand,* 64 F. Supp. 620 (S.D. Ill, 1946), aff'd 159 F. 2d 114 (C.A. 7, 1946) cert. denied 330 U.S. 843 (1947); *Bell* v. *Porter,* 159 F. 2d 117 (C.A. 7, 1946) cert. denied 330 U.S. 813 (1947); *Bridgeman* v. *Ford, Bacon & Davis,* 161 F. 2d 962 (C.A. 8, 1947); *Rokey* v. *Day & Zimmerman,* 157 F. 2d 736 (C.A. 8, 1946); *McLaughlin* v. *Todd & Brown, Inc.,* 7 W.H. Cases 1014; 15 Labor Cases para. 64,606 (N.D. Ind. 1948); *Campbell* v. *Jones & Laughlin,* 70 F. Supp. 996 (W.D. Pa. 1947).)
( b ) *Interruptions of sleep.* If the sleeping period is interrupted by a call to duty, the interruption must be counted as hours worked. If the period is interrupted to such an extent that the employee cannot get a reasonable night's sleep, the entire period must be counted. For enforcement purposes, the Divisons have adopted the rule that if the employee cannot get at least 5 hours' sleep during the scheduled period the entire time is working time. (See *Eustice* v. *Federal Cartridge Corp.,* 66 F. Supp. 55 (D. Minn. 1946).)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2019 

# Order

Clerk January 8, 2019

157903 (108) (111)

In re L.M.B., Minor. SC: 157903

COA: 338169

Wayne CC Family Division:

16

- 000241

- AD

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion to extend the time fo r filing the appellant ’ s

supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief submitted on November 30,

2018, is accepted as timely filed. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion of

attorney Elliot Margolis to withdraw as counsel for appellee Sarna is GRANTED.
§ 825.210 Employee payment of group health benefit premiums. ( a ) Group health plan benefits must be maintained on the same basis as coverage would have been provided if the employee had been continuously employed during the FMLA leave period. Therefore, any share of group health plan premiums which had been paid by the employee prior to FMLA leave must continue to be paid by the employee during the FMLA leave period. If premiums are raised or lowered, the employee would be required to pay the new premium rates. Maintenance of health insurance policies which are not a part of the employer's group health plan, as described in § 825.209(a), are the sole responsibility of the employee. The employee and the insurer should make necessary arrangements for payment of premiums during periods of unpaid FMLA leave.
( b ) If the FMLA leave is substituted paid leave, the employee's share of premiums must be paid by the method normally used during any paid leave, presumably as a payroll deduction.
( c ) If FMLA leave is unpaid, the employer has a number of options for obtaining payment from the employee. The employer may require that payment be made to the employer or to the insurance carrier, but no additional charge may be added to the employee's premium payment for administrative expenses. The employer may require employees to pay their share of premium payments in any of the following ways: ( 1 ) Payment would be due at the same time as it would be made if by payroll deduction;
( 2 ) Payment would be due on the same schedule as payments are made under COBRA;
( 3 ) Payment would be prepaid pursuant to a cafeteria plan at the employee's option;
( 4 ) The employer's existing rules for payment by employees on leave without pay would be followed, provided that such rules do not require prepayment (*i.e.,* prior to the commencement of the leave) of the premiums that will become due during a period of unpaid FMLA leave or payment of higher premiums than if the employee had continued to work instead of taking leave; or,
( 5 ) Another system voluntarily agreed to between the employer and the employee, which may include prepayment of premiums (e.g., through increased payroll deductions when the need for the FMLA leave is foreseeable).
( d ) The employer must provide the employee with advance written notice of the terms and conditions under which these payments must be made. *See* § 825.300(c).
( e ) An employer may not require more of an employee using unpaid FMLA leave than the employer requires of other employees on leave without pay.
( f ) An employee who is receiving payments as a result of a workers' compensation injury must make arrangements with the employer for payment of group health plan benefits when simultaneously taking FMLA leave. *See* § 825.207(e).