alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 801.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Effective December 27, 1988, the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA or the Act) prohibits most private employers (Federal, State, and local government employers are exempted from the Act) from using any lie detector tests either for pre-employment screening or during the course of employment. Polygraph tests, but no other types of lie detector tests, are permitted under limited circumstances subject to certain restrictions. The purpose of this part is to set forth the regulations to carry out the provisions of EPPA.
( b ) The regulations in this part are divided into six subparts. Subpart A contains the provisions generally applicable to covered employers, including the requirements relating to the prohibitions on lie detector use and the posting of notices. Subpart A also sets forth interpretations regarding the effect of section 10 of the Act on other laws or collective bargaining agreements. Subpart B sets forth rules regarding the statutory exemptions from application of the Act. Subpart C sets forth the restrictions on polygraph usage under such exemptions. Subpart D sets forth the recordkeeping requirements and the rules on the disclosure of polygraph test information. Subpart E deals with the authority of the Secretary of Labor and the enforcement provisions under the Act. Subpart F contains the procedures and rules of practice necessary for the administrative enforcement of the Act.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-139

_____________________________

KELVIN BERNARD WILLIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

August 17, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Victor D. Holder, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Steven Edward Woods, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 100.1100 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      159
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,088
<PP&E>                                              35
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,680
<BONDS>                                             12
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,123
<SALES>                                          1,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,657
<CGS>                                              309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
#### § 1691.8 Agency action on complaints dismissed by EEOC.

Upon EEOC's transmittal of a dismissal under § 1691.7 of this part, the referring agency shall determine within thirty days, what, if any, action the agency intends to take with respect to the complaint and then notify the complainant and the recipient. In reaching that determination, the referring agency shall give due weight to EEOC's determination that the title VII allegations of the joint complaint should be dismissed. If the referring agency decides to take action with respect to a complaint that EEOC has dismissed for lack of reasonable cause to believe that title VII has been violated, the agency shall notify the Assistant Attorney General and the Chairman of the EEOC in writing of the action it plans to take and the basis of its decision to take such action.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-188107) of Gazit Globe Ltd. and in the related Prospectus of
our reports dated March 23, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2014. 
  

							
					
				
							/s/ Kost Forer Gabby & Kasierer
	Tel-Aviv, Israel						KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
	April 22, 2015						A Member of Ernst & Young Global
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,883,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,247,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   224,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,903,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,456,000
<PP&E>                                      20,248,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,888,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,015,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,352,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,226,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,739,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,015,000
<SALES>                                     43,237,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,237,000
<CGS>                                       29,315,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,315,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,881,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             275,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,766,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,514,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,252,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,252,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
#### § 784.17 Basic coverage in general.

Except as otherwise provided in specific exemptions, the minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor standards of the Act are generally applicable to employees who engage in specified activities concerned with interstate or foreign commerce. The employment of oppressive child labor in or about establishments producing goods for such commerce is also restricted by the Act. The monetary and child labor standards of the Act are also generally applicable to other employees, not specifically exempted, who are employed in specified enterprises engaged in such commerce or in the production of goods for such commerce. The employer must observe the monetary standards with respect to all such employees in his employ except those who may be denied one or both of these benefits by virtue of some specific exemption provision of the Act, such as section 13(a)(5) or 13(b)(4). It should be noted that enterprises having employees subject to these exemptions may also have other employees who may be exempt under section 13(a)(1) of the Act, subject to conditions specified in regulations, as employees employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity, or in the capacity of outside salesman. The regulations governing these exemptions are set forth and explained in part 541 of this chapter.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit No. 23


                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP



Board of Directors
Market Facts, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-61726 and 333-37333) on Form S-8 of Market Facts, Inc. of our reports dated
February 9, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Market Facts,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, the related consolidated
statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows and the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 1998, which reports appear in or are
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of
Market Facts, Inc.



                                                       KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 24, 1999
(75 South. 1005)

#### HAYDEN v. DRENNEN MOTOR CAR CO.

(6 Div. 323.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 17, 1917.)

Appeal from Cireuit Court, Jefferson County; E. C. Crow, Judge.

Denson & Ivey, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM,

Appeal dismissed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132289 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132289 COA: 260031 Washtenaw CC: 03-000370-FC ROBERT LAWRENCE WILKENS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement
of Income for three month period ended March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          33,433
<SECURITIES>                                   598,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,125
<PP&E>                                          25,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,928)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 742,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,229
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,499,566
<OTHER-SE>                                   (975,436)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (708,969)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (708,969)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (708,969)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (708,969)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
The Board of Directors
Mercury General Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-
01583 on Form S-8 of Mercury General Corporation of our reports dated February
12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mercury General
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity,
and cash flows and related schedules for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, which reports appear in the December 31, 1998
annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury General Corporation.

                                           KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 19, 1999



                                 Exhibit 23.1
§ 553.25 Conditions for use of compensatory time (“reasonable period”, “unduly disrupt”). ( a ) Section 7(o)(5) of the FLSA provides that any employee of a public agency who has accrued compensatory time and requested use of this compensatory time, shall be permitted to use such time off within a “reasonable period” after making the request, if such use does not “unduly disrupt” the operations of the agency. This provision, however, does not apply to “other compensatory time” (as defined below in § 553.28), including compensatory time accrued for overtime worked prior to April 15, 1986.
( b ) Compensatory time cannot be used as a means to avoid statutory overtime compensation. An employee has the right to use compensatory time earned and must not be coerced to accept more compensatory time than an employer can realistically and in good faith expect to be able to grant within a reasonable period of his or her making a request for use of such time.
( c ) *Reasonable period.* ( 1 ) Whether a request to use compensatory time has been granted within a “reasonable period” will be determined by considering the customary work practices within the agency based on the facts and circumstances in each case. Such practices include, but are not limited to (a) the normal schedule of work, (b) anticipated peak workloads based on past experience, (c) emergency requirements for staff and services, and (d) the availability of qualified substitute staff.
( 2 ) The use of compensatory time in lieu of cash payment for overtime must be pursuant to some form of agreement or understanding between the employer and the employee (or the representative of the employee) reached prior to the performance of the work. (See § 553.23.) To the extent that the (conditions under which an employee can take compensatory time off are contained in an agreement or understanding as defined in § 553.23, the terms of such agreement or understanding will govern the meaning of “reasonable period”.
( d ) *Unduly disrupt.* When an employer receives a request for compensatory time off, it shall be honored unless to do so would be “unduly disruptive” to the agency's operations. Mere inconvenience to the employer is an insufficient basis for denial of a request for compensatory time off. (See H. Rep. 99-331, p. 23.) For an agency to turn down a request from an employee for compensatory time off requires that it should reasonably and in good faith anticipate that it would impose an unreasonable burden on the agency's ability to provide services of acceptable quality and quantity for the public during the time requested without the use of the employee's services.
[52 FR 2032, Jan. 16, 1987; 52 FR 2648, Jan. 23, 1987]
Argued and submitted December 10,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 30, 1992

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Claude E. Over, Claimant. LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Petitioners, v.*Claude E. OVER, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-08707; CA A75720)

842 P2d 819

Alexander D. Libmann, Trial Counsel, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Portland, filed the brief for petitioners.

Quintín B. Estell, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, *rev den*315 Or 271 (1992).
#### § 810.135 Interns, students, and trainees.

Hours worked by an intern, student, or trainee who does not have an express or implied compensation agreement with the employer are not considered hours worked in direct production, and therefore are not included in the average hourly base wage rate calculation.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Geologic Sequestration 

Meetmg Documentation Interagency Meeting - Discuss Interagency Comments, January 21, 2010 

Date Staff Contact Information Name of Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting Written Comments 

1121 

(Name, email, phone #) Organization requirements, etc.) Provided? 

Suzie Kocchi, 

Kocchi.suzanne@epa.gov 

202-343-9387 

(Attach list of Did they also 

all attendees submit to Docket? 

names and 

emails if 

possible) 

Agencies 

attending: 

EPA 

OMB 

CEQ 

A meeting was held to discuss interagency 

comments on the geologic sequestration proposal 

Yes 

Date sent to EPACCD 

1/11/10 
· . 

Geologic Sequestration 

Background 

For Discussion Only: Do not Cite 

or Distribute
§ 779.251 Goods that have lost their out-of-State identity. ( a ) Goods which are purchased or received by the enterprise within the State will not be considered goods which have “moved across State lines” if the goods, although they came from outside the State, had been processed or manufactured so as to have lost their identity as out-of-State goods before they are purchased or received by the enterprise. This assumes, of course, that the goods so manufactured or processed do not move across State lines before they are sold by the enterprise. Thus where an enterprise buys bread baked within the State which does not move across State lines before it is resold by the enterprise, the bread is not “goods, which have moved across State lines” even if the flour and other ingredients came from outside the State. The same conclusion will follow, under the same circumstances, where clothing is manufactured from out-of-State fabrics.
( b ) In those cases where goods are composed in part of goods which have, and in part of goods which have not, moved across State lines, the entire product will be considered as goods which have moved across State lines, if, as a practical matter, it substantially consists of goods which are identifiable as out-of-State goods. Whether goods have been so changed as to have lost their out-of-State identity is question which will depend upon all the facts in a particular case.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Older Americans Month 2016 Posters
 Posters
The following posters celebrating Older Americans Month may be reproduced and used electronically and in hard copy. Two poster sizes are provided, and for each size, two options are supplied. One file is a typical PDF for posting and printing (ready-to-use). The other includes crop marks and ink bleeds for professional printing only.
**This year we have added an 8.5"x11" editable version in case you would like to highlight your own trailblazers.**
**Ready-to-Use**8.5"x11" (PDF, 2.43MB)  |  18"x24" (PDF, 8.35MB)
**Professional Printing**8.5"x11" (PDF, 2.63MB)  |  18"x24" (PDF, 8.77MB)
**Editable Version**8.5"x11" (PDF, 386KB)  |  8.5"x11" (DOCX, 770KB)

                    *Last modified on 02/03/2019*
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living