alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Kinloch, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Maverick Minerals Corporation;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 19th day of November, 2003.

| | /s/ Robert Kinloch
Robert Kinloch
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 29, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60109 Summary Calendar

RAMON NONATO MEDINA-TORRES

Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 490 066

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ramon Nonato Medina-Torres (Medina) seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismissed his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Medina argues that the immigration proceedings should be reopened because he had reasonable cause for failing to appear at the immigration hearing. He also argues that the BIA abused its discretion by dismissing as untimely his motion to reopen his immigration proceedings based upon his eligibility for relief.No. 06-60109 -2- Medina’s factual argument that he did not receive notice of the hearing is belied by the record. Rather than directly address the BIA’s determination that the hearing notice that was served on his attorney was effective as to Medina pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 292.5, Medina argues that he failed to appear due to counsel’s ineffectiveness. However, Medina admittedly failed to follow the procedural requirements necessary to use counsel’s ineffectiveness

as a basis for reopening. See Lara v. Trominski , 216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir. 2000) ( citing Matter of Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (BIA 1988)). He thus cannot successfully rely on his counsel’s actions to support his assertion that his counsel’s performance constitutes reasonable cause for his failure to attend the hearing. See id. Therefore, Medina has failed to demonstrate reasonable

cause for his absence at the immigration hearing. Williams-Igwonobe v. Gonzales , 437 F.3d 453, 455 (5th Cir. 2006). Similarly, Medina’s argument that his motion should not be considered time-barred is premised on his counsel’s performance. As discussed above, Medina admittedly failed to follow the procedural requirements necessary to use counsel’s ineffectiveness

as a basis for reopening. See Lara , 216 F.3d at 496. He therefore cannot rely on counsel’s purported ineffectiveness to c ircumvent the time-bar. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). To the extent that Medina is arguing that equitable tolling should apply to his case,

even if the doctrine of equitable tolling applied in this instance, Medina’s conclusional, unsupported arguments do not indicate thatNo. 06-60109 -3- Medina’s case is the rare and exceptional case that warrants equitable tolling. See, e.g. , Fierro v. Cockrell , 294 F.3d 674, 682 (5th Cir. 2002). The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Medina’s motion to reopen. Lara , 216 F.3d at 496. Medina’s petition for review is therefore DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 62 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

:\SENENR\sc62--enr.xml [file 1 of 1]

        S.Con.Res.62
                                             Agreed to December 19, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of H.R. 660, an Act to amend title 18, United 
States Code, to protect judges, prosecutors, witnesses, victims, and 
their family members, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall strike section 502 of the Act and insert the 
following:

``SEC. 502. MAGISTRATE JUDGES LIFE INSURANCE.

    ``(a) In General.--Section 604(a)(5) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting after `hold office during good behavior', 
the following: `magistrate judges appointed under section 631 of this 
title,'.
    ``(b) Construction.--For purposes of construing and applying 
chapter 87 of title 5, United States Code, including any adjustment of 
insurance rates by regulation or otherwise, the following categories of 
judicial officers shall be deemed to be judges of the United States as 
described under section 8701 of title 5, United States Code:
        ``(1) Magistrate judges appointed under section 631 of title 
    28, United States Code.
        ``(2) Magistrate judges retired under section 377 of title 28, 
    United States Code.
    ``(c) Effective Date.--Subsection (b) and the amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any payment made on or after 
the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 
the date of enactment of this Act.''.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald P. Erickson, Chief Executive Officer and I, Mark Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.





This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.





/s/ Ronald P. Erickson


Ronald P. Erickson


Chief Executive Officer


May 4, 2011





/s/ Mark Scott


Mark Scott


Chief Financial Officer


May 4, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas V. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Douglas V. Smith                                   
|Douglas V. Smith Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2006

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any other purpose.
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.555 Recurring Unescorted Access for Risk Group A vessels and facilities. This section describes how designated TWIC-holders may access certain secure areas on Risk Group A vessels and facilities on a continual and repeated basis without undergoing repeated electronic TWIC inspections. ( a ) An individual may enter a secure area on a vessel or facility without undergoing an electronic TWIC inspection under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Access is through a Designated Recurring Access Area (DRAA), designated under an approved Vessel, Facility, or Joint Vessel-Facility Security Plan.
( 2 ) The entire DRAA is continuously monitored by security personnel at the access points to secure areas used by personnel seeking Recurring Unescorted Access.
( 3 ) The individual possesses a valid TWIC.
( 4 ) The individual has passed an electronic TWIC inspection within each shift and in the presence of the on-scene security personnel.
( 5 ) The individual passes an additional electronic TWIC inspection prior to being granted unescorted access to a secure area if he or she enters an unsecured area outside the DRAA and then returns.
( b ) The following requirements apply to a DRAA: ( 1 ) It must consist of an unsecured area where personnel will be moving into an adjacent secure area repeatedly.
( 2 ) The entire DRAA must be visible to security personnel.
( 3 ) During operation as a DRAA, there must be security personnel present at all times.
( c ) An area may operate as a DRAA at certain times, and during other times, access to secure areas may be obtained through the procedures in § 101.535.
( d ) Personnel may enter the secure areas adjacent to a DRAA at any time using the procedures in § 101.535.
[USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57710, Aug. 23, 2016]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Theinfluence of history on Mahan : the proceedings of a conference marking thecentenary of Alfred Thayer Mahan�s The influence of sea power upon history,1660-1783
 
PDF|epub| mobi|
 
SuDoc Number:D 208.210:9
Item Number:0408-A-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001090921
April 8, 2019
#### § 901.1 Scope and application.

The Construction Industry Collective Bargaining Commission hereby states its policy and sets forth procedures for handling disputes involving the standard labor and management organizations in the building and construction industry. These procedures are pursuant to the authority set forth in Executive Order 11482, dated September 22, 1969. Section 6 of the order states that, “The Commission is authorized to issue such rules and regulations, and to adopt such procedures governing its affairs, including the conduct of its disputes settlement functions, as shall be necessary and appropriate to effectuate the objectives of this order.”
#### § 779.17 Wage and wage payments to tipped employees.

Section 3(m) of the Act provides that as used in the Act, “wage” paid to any employee:

includes the reasonable cost, as determined by the Secretary of Labor, to the employer of furnishing such employee with board, lodging, or other facilities, if such board, lodging or other facilities are customarily furnished by such employer to his employees: *Provided,* That the cost of board, lodging, or other facilities shall not be included as a part of the wage paid to any employee to the extent it is excluded therefrom under the terms of a bona fide collective-bargaining agreement applicable to the particular employee: *Provided further,* That the Secretary is authorized to determine the fair value of such board, lodging, or other facilities for defined classes of employees and in defined areas, based on average cost to the employer or to groups of employers similarly situated, or average value to groups of employees, or other appropriate measures of fair value. Such evaluations, where applicable and pertinent, shall be used in lieu of actual measure of cost in determining the wage paid to any employee. In determining the wage of a tipped employee, the amount paid such employee by his employer shall be deemed to be increased on account of tips by an amount determined by the employer, but not by an amount in excess of 50 per centum of the applicable minimum wage rate, except that in the case of an employee who (either himself or acting through his representative) shows to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the actual amount of tips received by him was less than the amount determined by the employer as the amount by which the wage paid him was deemed to be increased under this sentence, the amount paid such employee by his employer shall be deemed to have been increased by such lesser amount.

As explained in part 531 of this chapter, section 3(m) of the Act governs the payment of wages required by the Act, including payment in other than cash and in tips. Part 531 of this chapter contains the regulations under which the reasonable cost or fair value of such facilities furnished may be computed for inclusion as part of wages required by the Act. Section 3(m) provides a method for determining the wage of a “tipped employee” and this term as defined in section 3(t) of the Act “means any employee engaged in an occupation in which he customarily and regularly receives more than $20 a month in tips”. Regulations under which wage credits are permitted on account of tips paid to “tipped employees” are also contained in part 531 of this chapter.
§ 4044.74 Withdrawal of employee contributions. ( a ) If a participant has not started to receive monthly benefit payments on the date of distribution, the value of the lump sum which returns mandatory employee contributions is equal to the total amount of contributions made by the participant, plus interest that is payable to the participant under the terms of the plan, plus interest on that total amount from the date of termination to the date of distribution. The rate of interest credited on employee contributions up to the date of termination shall be the greater of the interest rate provided under the terms of the plan or the interest rate required under section 204(c) of ERISA or section 411(c) of the IRC.
( b ) If a participant has started to receive monthly benefit payments on the date of distribution, part of which are attributable to his or her contributions, the value of the lump sum which returns employee contributions is equal to the excess of the amount described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section over the amount computed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. ( 1 ) The amount of accumulated mandatory employee contributions remaining in the plan as of the date of termination plus interest from the date of termination to the date of distribution.
( 2 ) The excess of benefit payments made from the plan between date of plan termination and the date of distribution, over the amount of payments that would have been made if the employee contributions had been paid as a lump sum on the date of plan termination, with interest accumulated on the excess from the date of payment to the date of distribution.
( c ) *Interest assumptions.* The interest rate used under this section to credit interest between the date of termination to the date of distribution shall be a reasonable rate and shall be the same for both paragraphs (a) and (b).
#### § 783.18 Commerce activities of employees.

Prior to the 1961 Amendments, the Fair Labor Standards Act applied to all employees, not specifically exempted, who are engaged (a) in interstate or foreign commerce or (b) in the production of goods for such commerce, which is defined to include any closely related process or occupation directly, essential to such production (29 U.S.C. 206(a), 207(a); and see §§ 783.12 to 783.15 for definitions governing the scope of this coverage). The Act as amended in 1961 continues this coverage. In general, employees of businesses concerned with the transportation of goods or persons on navigable waters are engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, or in the production of goods for such commerce, as defined in the Act, and are subject to the Act's provisions except as otherwise provided in sections 13(a)(14) and 13(b)(6) or other express exemptions. A detailed discussion of the activities in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce which will bring an employee under the Act is contained in part 776 of this chapter, dealing with general coverage.
PUBLIC LAW 115–303—DEC. 11, 2018 132 STAT. 4399 

Public Law 115–303 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 to strengthen 

the aerospace workforce pipeline by the promotion of Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program and National Aeronautics and Space Administration internship 

and fellowship opportunities to women, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women in Aerospace Education 

Act’’. 

SEC. 2. ROBERT NOYCE TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–368; 42 U.S.C. 1862n et seq.) 

is amended— 

(1) in section 10(a)(3)(A)(iv), by inserting ‘‘, including 

research experiences at national laboratories and NASA centers’’ before the semicolon; and 

(2) in section 10A(c)(4)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 

the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(C) providing internship opportunities for fellows, 

including research experiences at national laboratories and 

NASA Centers.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall apply with respect to grants awarded on or after October 

1, 2018. 

SEC. 3. NASA INTERNSHIP AND FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES. 

Not later than October 1, 2018, the Administrator of the 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (in this section 

referred to as ‘‘NASA’’) shall institute a process to encourage the 

recruitment of qualified candidates who are women or individuals 

who are underrepresented in the fields of science, technology, 

engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and computer science for 

Deadline. 

51 USC 40901 

note prec. 

42 USC 1862n–1 

note. 

42 USC 

1862n–1a. 

42 USC 1862n–1. 

42 USC 1861 

note. 

Women in 

Aerospace 

Education Act. 

Dec. 11, 2018 

[H.R. 4254] 

132 STAT. 4400 PUBLIC LAW 115–303—DEC. 11, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4254: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–472 (Comm. on Science, Space, and Technology). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Dec. 18, 19, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

Nov. 27, House concurred in Senate amendment. 

Æ 

internships and fellowships at NASA with relevance to the aerospace sector and related fields. 

Approved December 11, 2018.
Exhibit 10.2


 


COMCAST CORPORATION


 


ONE COMCAST CENTER


 


PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19103


 


 




	April 24, 2015





 




 


Charter Communications, Inc.


400 Atlantic Street, 10th Floor


Stamford, Connecticut  06901


Attention: Rick Dykhouse (General Counsel)


 



	
Re: 

	
Termination of Comcast-Charter Transactions







 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to the Transactions Agreement (the “Transactions Agreement”), dated as of April 25, 2014, between Comcast Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, and Charter Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation.  Capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Transactions Agreement.


 


Please be advised that the Comcast-TWC Transaction has been terminated, effective as of April 24, 2015.  Pursuant to the “Termination” section of the Transactions Agreement, the Transactions Agreement became terminable upon termination of the Comcast-TWC Transaction.  Accordingly, this letter is to notify you that the Transactions Agreement is hereby terminated.


 




	
Sincerely,

	 
	 	 
	
COMCAST CORPORATION

	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Arthur R. Block	 
	 	Name: 	Arthur R. Block	 
	 	Title: 	Executive Vice President