alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Illinois Central Railroad Company & Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad Company v. Taylor & Sweeney.

(Decided June 16, 1915.)

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

MILLER, SANDIDGE & MALIN, TRABUE, DOOLAN & COX and R. V. FLETCHER for appellants.

W. T. ELLIS and O. H. HAYNES for appellees.

Eesponse to Petition for Extension and Modification of Opinion by

Judge Hurt

Granting petition for extension and overruling as to modification. (For original opinion see 164 Ky., 150.)

The petition for an extension of the opinion in this case is granted. For the reasons stated in the opinion, this court is unable to fix upon the line between the portion of the lands owned by appellants under the deed from Monarch to the Owensborough, Falls of Eough, and Green Eiver Eailroad Company, and the portion of it owned by appellees. The circumstances, as shown by the proof, must determine what portion of the lands is embraced by the words, “for railroad purposes, as now established,” in the deed from Monarch to the railroad company. When it was determined, in the opinion, that the appellants were the owners, under the deed, of the portion of the-lands occupied by the tracks, switches, and buildings of the railroad company, it was not meant, thereby, to restrict the lands conveyed by the deed to such portion of it as was immediately underneath the tracks, switches, and buildings, used in the operation of the road and the conduct of its *504business, but it was intended thereby to hold that' the appellants were, under the deed, the owners of the lands occupied by the tracks, switches, and buildings, and such portion of it, in addition thereto, as was necessary to the appropriate use of the tracks, switches, and buildings thereon, in the operation of the railroad at the time of the making of the deed. The remainder of the lands is the property of the appellees. ■

So far as the petition seeks a modification of the opinion, it is overruled.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 1363 LT Case No. 2016

- CF

- 8663

- A

_____________________________
B RYAN K EEFE G OGGINS , JR

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Tatiana Salvador , Judge

. Bryan Keefe Goggins, Jr, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

October 10 , 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
E DWARDS , C.J.
, B OATWRIGHT , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
First Amendment to the Equity Participation Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 IPC THE HOSPITALIST COMPANY, INC.

 2012 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. (“Company”) has adopted the IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc. 2012 Equity Participation Plan (the “Plan”),
subject to stockholder approval at the Company’s annual meeting scheduled for June 7, 2012; and 
 WHEREAS, the
Company considers it desirable to amend the Plan to reduce the number of shares of Company common stock to be available for awards granted under the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the power reserved to the Board of Directors of the Company by Section 5.2 of the Plan, the Plan hereby is amended by deleting the reference to
“2,100,000 shares,” where it appears in Section 1.5 of the Plan, and inserting a reference to “1,800,000 shares” in its place. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors this 30th day of May 2012. 
  

					
		 	IPC The Hospitalist Company, Inc.
	Date: May 30, 2012	 		 	
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Devra G. Shapiro

		 		 	Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate
		 	Its:	 	Secretary
<PAGE>
                                             EXHIBIT (24)

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                        -----------------
  
   Each of the undersigned directors of The Narragansett Electric
  Company (the "Company"), individually as a director of the Company,
  hereby constitutes and appoints John G. Cochrane, Robert K. Wulff, and
  Geraldine M. Zipser, individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on
  behalf of the undersigned the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for
  the year ended December 31, 1998, to be filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission, and to execute any appropriate amendment or
  amendments thereto as may be required by law.
  
  Dated this 17th day of March, 1999.
  
                                     s/Michael F. Ryan
  _________________________          _________________________
  Richard W. Frost                   Michael F. Ryan
  
  
  s/Cheryl A. LaFleur                s/Richard P. Sergel
  _________________________          _________________________
  Cheryl A. LaFleur                  Richard P. Sergel
  
  
  s/Robert L. McCabe                 s/Ronald L. Thomas
  _________________________          _________________________ 
  Robert L. McCabe                   Ronald L. Thomas
  
  
  s/Lawrence J. Reilly
  _________________________
  Lawrence J. Reilly
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Older Americans Month 2016 Tip Sheets
 Info Tip Sheets
Civic Engagement
(PDF, 797KB)OAM 2016 Civil Engagement Tipsheet thumbnail
Reinvention (PDF, 1.07MB)OAM 2016 Civil Engagement Tipsheet thumbnail

Securing Your Finances
(PDF, 790 KB)OAM 2016 Civil Engagement Tipsheet thumbnail
Wellness
(PDF, 1.33MB)OAM 2016 Civil Engagement Tipsheet thumbnail

                    *Last modified on 02/03/2019*
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
#### § 779.7 Significance of official interpretations.

The regulations in this part contain the official interpretations of the Department of Labor with respect to the application under described circumstances of the provisions of law which they discuss. These interpretations indicate the construction of the law which the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator believe to be correct and which will guide them in the performance of their duties under the Act unless and until they are otherwise directed by authoritative decisions of the courts or conclude, upon reexamination of an interpretation, that it is incorrect.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Terry A. Hanson

Terry A. Hanson

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: March 8, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pick Ups Plus, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  November 18, 2004


                                      --------------------------------
                                         Robert White
                                         Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: : May 14, 2010/s/ Yanlin HanYanlin HanChief Executive OfficerDated: : May 14, 2010/s/ Garry WongGarry WongChief Financial Officer


---
§ 825.218 Substantial and grievous economic injury. ( a ) In order to deny restoration to a key employee, an employer must determine that the restoration of the employee to employment will cause substantial and grievous economic injury to the operations of the employer, not whether the absence of the employee will cause such substantial and grievous injury.
( b ) An employer may take into account its ability to replace on a temporary basis (or temporarily do without) the employee on FMLA leave. If permanent replacement is unavoidable, the cost of then reinstating the employee can be considered in evaluating whether substantial and grievous economic injury will occur from restoration; in other words, the effect on the operations of the company of reinstating the employee in an equivalent position.
( c ) A precise test cannot be set for the level of hardship or injury to the employer which must be sustained. If the reinstatement of a key employee threatens the economic viability of the firm, that would constitute substantial and grievous economic injury. A lesser injury which causes substantial, long-term economic injury would also be sufficient. Minor inconveniences and costs that the employer would experience in the normal course of doing business would certainly not constitute substantial and grievous economic injury.
( d ) FMLA's substantial and grievous economic injury standard is different from and more stringent than the undue hardship test under the ADA. *See also* § 825.702.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 429 

Honoring the brave men and women of the United States Coast Guard 

whose tireless work, dedication, and commitment to protecting the United 

States have led to the confiscation of over 350,000 pounds of cocaine 

at sea during 2007. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2008 

Mrs. DOLE (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. BURR, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. 

SNOWE, and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the brave men and women of the United States 

Coast Guard whose tireless work, dedication, and commitment to protecting the United States have led to 

the confiscation of over 350,000 pounds of cocaine at 

sea during 2007. 

Whereas the estimated import value of the 350,000 pounds 

of cocaine confiscated by the United States Coast Guard 

in 2007 is more than $4,700,000,000, or nearly 1⁄2 of the 

Coast Guard’s annual budget; 

Whereas the Coast Guard’s at-sea drug interdictions are 

making a difference in the lives of United States citizens, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 429 IS 

as evidenced by the reduced supply of cocaine in more 

than 35 major cities throughout the United States; 

Whereas keeping illegal drugs from reaching our shores, 

where they undermine American values and threaten 

families, schools, and communities, continues to be an 

important national priority; 

Whereas, through robust interagency teamwork, collaboration 

with international partners, and ever more effective tools 

and tactics, the Coast Guard has removed more than 

2,000,000 pounds of cocaine during the past 10 years 

and will continue to tighten the web of detection and 

interdiction at sea; and 

Whereas the men and women of the Coast Guard who, while 

away from family and hundreds of miles from our shores, 

execute this dangerous mission, as well as other vital 

maritime safety, security, and environmental protection 

missions, with quiet dedication and without need of public recognition, continue to display selfless service in protecting the Nation and the American people: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the United States Coast Guard, with 

3 its proud 217-year legacy of maritime law enforce4 ment and border protection, along with the brave 

5 men and women whose efforts clearly demonstrate 

6 the honor, respect, and devotion to duty that ensure 

7 the parents of the United States can sleep soundly 

8 knowing the Coast Guard is on patrol; and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 429 IS 

1 (2) recognizes the tireless work, dedication, and 

2 commitment that have allowed the Coast Guard to 

3 confiscate over 350,000 pounds of cocaine at sea in 

4 2007. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
null

2017-10-10

547.3374

eng - Argued: 2017-10-10. Docket number: 16-2542
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 22 

Reaffirming the constitutional and statutory protections accorded sealed 

domestic mail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2007 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. COLEMAN, and 

Mr. AKAKA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the constitutional and statutory protections 

accorded sealed domestic mail, and for other purposes. 

Whereas all Americans depend on the United States Postal 

Service to transact business and communicate with 

friends and family; 

Whereas postal customers have a constitutional right to expect that their sealed domestic mail will be protected 

against unreasonable searches; 

Whereas the circumstances and procedures under which the 

Government may search sealed mail are well defined, including provisions under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), and generally require prior judicial approval; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 22 IS 

Whereas the United States Postal Inspection Service has the 

authority to open and search a sealed envelope or package when there is immediate threat to life or limb or an 

immediate and substantial danger to property; 

Whereas the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act 

(Public Law 109–435) expressly reaffirmed the right of 

postal customers to have access to a class of mail sealed 

against inspection; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service affirmed January 

4, 2007, that the enactment of the Postal Accountability 

and Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435) does not 

grant Federal law enforcement officials any new authority to open domestic mail; 

Whereas the signing statement on the Postal Accountability 

and Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435) issued by 

President Bush on December 20, 2006, raises questions 

about the President’s commitment to abide by these basic 

privacy protections; and 

Whereas the Senate rejects any interpretation of the President’s signing statement on the Postal Accountability and 

Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435) that in any way 

diminishes the privacy protections accorded sealed domestic mail under the Constitution and Federal laws and 

regulations: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate reaffirms the constitutional 

2 and statutory protections accorded sealed domestic mail. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
08/09/2006 

Administration on Aging (AoA)

FY 2006 Nutrition Services Incentive Program (NSIP) Grant Awards for the States

FY Type Grantee Name Cash Allocation

2006 State Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District of Columbia

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Territory Guam

Northern Mariana Islands

Puerto Rico

Virgin Islands

Total

$2,696,264

$324,057

$1,889,692

$2,244,530

$11,259,442

$1,139,168

$1,529,905

$497,937

$499,643

$7,632,468

$2,508,510

$532,158

$666,789

$5,991,116

$1,516,434

$1,795,446

$1,715,147

$1,882,124

$2,876,643

$626,624

$1,779,812

$3,716,375

$7,033,422

$2,145,931

$1,602,505

$4,028,447

$711,742

$1,318,195

$671,714

$869,362

$3,579,476

$1,718,687

$14,641,700

$3,139,936

$825,461

$5,224,143

$2,588,379

$1,655,934

$6,555,999

$613,606

$1,792,755

$977,169

$1,837,382

$9,434,137

$1,224,331

$619,026

$2,165,219

$1,838,642

$1,477,556

$2,986,536

$789,061

$278,451

$73,522

$2,450,388

$118,576

$142,307,674
Letter Agreement among Graphic Packaging Holding Company, Graphic Packaging International, Inc. and David W. Scheible dated March 9, 2015.











March 9, 2015


David,


It is the Board’s desire to insure management and organizational stability as an important contributing factor to an increase in shareholder value.   To this end, you are eligible to receive a “Retention Bonus” as defined in your amended and restated employment agreement dated November 21, 2013 (the “Amended Agreement”).  This Retention Bonus, from $0 - $4 million, is at the full discretion of the Board.  


Based on your 2014 performance in driving shareholder value, overachievement of financial metrics, and the strong development of organizational talent, I am pleased to confirm the Board’s desire to guarantee you a minimum payment of $2 million as your Retention Bonus, payable under the terms of your Amended Agreement.  This of course remains contingent on your continued employment with the Company through March 1, 2016 and satisfaction of all other applicable terms and conditions of your Amended Agreement.




Best Regards,


/s/ Carla J. Chaney


Carla J. Chaney
SVP Human Resources




cc:  Andrea Botta, Chairman Compensation & Benefits Committee
       Lauren Tashma, SVP Legal, General Counsel and Secretary    



1
#### § 794.122 Ascertainment of “annual” gross sales volume.

The annual gross volume of sales of an enterprise engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products consists of its gross dollar volume of sales during a 12-month period. Where a computation of annual gross volume of sales is necessary to determine the status of the enterprise under section 7(b)(3) of the Act, it must be based on the most recent prior experience which it is practicable to use.