alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             266
<SECURITIES>                                       457
<RECEIVABLES>                                      413
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                        743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,870
<PP&E>                                           3,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                     518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              847
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,380
<SALES>                                          4,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,283
<CGS>                                            3,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (54)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    311
<INCOME-TAX>                                       117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                194
<DISCONTINUED>                                       9
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  32
     STATEMENT  UNDER  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


The  undersigned,  the  Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer and the
Senior  Vice  President, Finance, of MacDermid, Incorporated ("the Corporation")
respectively,  each  hereby  certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:
The  annual  report  on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the annual period ended
December  31,  2004,  filed  on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  ("the Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
Information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of operations as of December 31, 2004, of
the  Corporation.





Date:  April 13,  2005                                  /s/  Daniel  H.  Leever
       --------------                                   -----------------------
   for  the  amended  Form  10-K/A
   certifying  the  report  as  of  March  15,  2005,        Daniel  H.  Leever
     the  date  of  original  filing                              Chairman  and
                                                      Chief  Executive  Officer



Date:  April 13,  2005                            /s/  Gregory  M.  Bolingbroke
       --------------                             -----------------------------
   for  the  amended  Form  10-K/A
   certifying  the  report  as  of
   March  15,  2005,                                      Gregory M. Bolingbroke
   the  date  of  original  filing             Senior  Vice  President,  Finance

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to the Corporation and will be
retained  by  the  Corporation  and  furnished  to  the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
February 2, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

REGINALD DEWAYNE JOH NSON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01084

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , that the appellant pay all costs expended in this

app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
MADISON 

AREA I TECHNICAL 

COLLEGE 

PRESIDENT'S OFFICE 

Jack E. Daniels. Ill. Ph.D .. President 

January 16, 2014 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx and Administrator Huerta: 

The Honorable Michael P. Huerta 

Administrator 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

I am writing to you today to communicate the importance of preventing the discontinuation of non-stop 

air service from Dane County Regional Airport (MSN) in Madison, Wisconsin to Washington, D.C. (DCA). 

Republic Airways recently divested Frontier Airlines, resulting in the termination of a flight agreement, 

therefore ending nonstop service from Madison to Washington, D.C (DCA) in the near future. 

Without the continued nonstop service proposed by Republic under the Delta Connection brand, 

Madison would lose all nonstop service to the nation's capital. No party contends otherwise. The 

Secretary alone has the discretion to grant the relief sought by Republic and to determine what 

circumstances qualify as "exceptional" under 49 U.S.C. § 41714(d). We respectfully submit that there is 

no more exceptional circumstance or exceptional need than to allow Republic to continue a successful 

and established nonstop service linking Madison and DCA. 

The retention of this service to Washington D.C.'s preferred airport is vital to our institution. Madison 

College Administrators regularly travel to Washington D.C. for business meetings, training, and 

conventions. College administrators maintain active membership with several organizations to ensure 

the College is always on the cutting edge of higher education administration. Several of these 

organizations regularly meet in Washington D.C. 

On behalf of Madison Area Technical College, I strongly urge the Department to move swiftly to grant 

the request of Republic Airlines the ability to use available DCA slots for Shuttle America service to DCA 

to prevent a temporary disruption to this important daily service. 

Best Regards, 

,1 Jac E. aniels, Ill, Ph.D. 

S10-14(H24-0'10 odison, Wisconsin 53704-2599 p: (608) 246-6678 f: (608) 246-6700 modisoncollege.edu 
-)MADISON '{(I AREA I TECHNICAL 

PRESIDENT'S OFFICE 

1701 Wnght Sf • MOd1son. WI 53704·2599 

neopost. 

. "' "' . ...... . (If..., :ti •l-"1 f,;Ie} :1 

I' : ~;,·:( :6= : ... w-::,t 

:.'f. .·': 'li nr:tv F 3: ti r- r .s- r 4 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

$00.38~ 

...,.~ ..... ,...- ..... 

\...R t?.-S-:":•;% '25~ ~ •\1\11 •11" 'Ill" •\l•l'lll\11111

•1l""l''lt•l 11 "'1t 1111 u•f1 1 1

1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34501-34502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-061]


Notice of Agency Report Forms Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). The reports will be utilized by 
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to support services dependent upon 
accurate locator-type information.

DATES: All comments should be submitted on or before July 30, 2000.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Ms. Lois Ryno, Goddard 
Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 
Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771-001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Title: Locator and Information Services Tracking System (LISTS).
    OMB Number: 2700-0064.
    Type of review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: The LIST System is used primarily to support 
services on the Center dependent upon accurate locator-type 
information.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Number of Respondents: 8,456.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 8,456.
    Hours Per Request: .083.
    Annual Burden Hours: 702.

[[Page 34502]]

    Frequency of Report: As required.

David B. Nelson,
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-13357 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Exhibit 23.2




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-130763 and Form S-8 No. 333-91192) of The LGL Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 29, 2007, except for Notes 2 and 13, as to which the date is
May 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The LGL
Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
 
 /s/ ERNST
& YOUNG LLP
 
 Providence,
Rhode Island
 May 7,
2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Penton Media, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Preston L. Vice, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                           and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ PRESTON L. VICE
-------------------
Preston L. Vice

Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)

March 31, 2003
§ 531.33 “Reasonable cost”; “fair value.” ( a ) Section 3(m) directs the Administrator to determine “the reasonable cost * * * to the employer of furnishing * * * facilities” to the employee, and in addition it authorizes him to determine “the fair value” of such facilities for defined classes of employees and in defined areas, which may be used in lieu of the actual measure of the cost of such facilities in ascertaining the “wages” paid to any employee. Subpart B contains three methods whereby an employer may ascertain whether any furnished facilities are a part of “wages” within the meaning of section 3(m): ( 1 ) An employer may calculate the “reasonable cost” of facilities in accordance with the requirements set forth in § 531.3;
( 2 ) an employer may request that a determination of “reasonable cost” be made, including a determination having particular application; and
( 3 ) an employer may request that a determination of “fair value” of the furnished facilities be made to be used in lieu of the actual measure of the cost of the furnished facilities in assessing the “wages” paid to an employee.
( b ) “Reasonable cost,” as determined in § 531.3 “does not include a profit to the employer or to any affiliated person.” Although the question of affiliation is one of fact, where any of the following persons operate company stores or commissaries or furnish lodging or other facilities they will normally be deemed “affiliated persons” within the meaning of the regulations: ( 1 ) A spouse, child, parent, or other close relative of the employer;
( 2 ) a partner, officer, or employee in the employer company or firm;
( 3 ) a parent, subsidiary, or otherwise closely connected corporation; and
( 4 ) an agent of the employer.
#### § 452.12 Organizations comprised of government employees.

An organization composed entirely of government employees (other than employees of the United States Postal Service) is not subject to the election provisions of the Act. Section 3(e) of the Act, defining the term “employer,” specifically excludes the United States Government, its wholly owned corporations, and the States and their political subdivisions from the scope of that term, and section 3(f) defines an “employee” as an individual employed by an “employer.” Since a “labor organization” is defined in section 3(i) as one in which “employees” participate and which exists in whole or in part for the purpose of “dealing with employers,” an organization composed entirely of government employees would not be a “labor organization”[13] as that term is defined in the Act. However, section 1209 of the Postal Reorganization Act provides that organizations of employees of the United States Postal Service shall be subject to the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act. A national, international or intermediate labor organization which has some locals of government employees not covered by the Act and other locals which are mixed or are composed entirely of employees covered by the Act would be subject to the election requirements of the Act. Its mixed locals would also be subject to the Act. The requirements would not apply to locals composed entirely of government employees not covered by the Act, except with respect to the election of officers of a parent organization which is subject to those requirements or the election of delegates to a convention of such parent organization, or to an intermediate body to which the requirements apply.

[38 FR 18324, July 9, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985; 63 FR 33780, June 19, 1998]

###### Footnotes -
  452.12

[13] Most labor organizations composed of Federal Government employees are subject to the standards of conduct provisions of the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C. 7120, or the Foreign Service Act, 22 U.S.C. 4117. The regulations implementing those statutory provisions are contained in parts 457-459 of this chapter.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE0 1 4 21

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 801.71 Filing and service. ( a ) Filing. All documents submitted to the Secretary shall be filed with the Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.
( b ) Number of copies. An original and two copies of all documents shall be filed.
( c ) Computation of time for delivery by mail. Documents are not deemed filed with the Secretary until actually received by the Secretary. All documents, including documents filed by mail, must be received by the Secretary either on or before the due date. No additional time shall be added where service of a document requiring action within a prescribed time thereafter was made by mail.
( d ) Manner and proof of service. A copy of all documents filed with the Secretary shall be served upon all other parties involved in the proceeding. Service under this section shall be by personal delivery or by mail. Service by mail is deemed effected at the time of mailing to the last known address.
[56 FR 9064, Mar. 4, 1991; 56 FR 14469, Apr. 10, 1991]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34489-34490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Federal Credentialing Program; Working Meeting

    Announcement is made of the following Federal Credentialing Program 
(FCP)Working Meeting scheduled for July 10-13, 2000:

    Name: Federal Credentialing Program Working Meeting.
    Date and Time:
    Monday, July 10, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Tuesday, July 11, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Wednesday, July 12, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Thursday, July 13, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.
    Place: The Hilton Alexandria Mark Center, 5000 Seminary Road, 
Alexandria, VA 22311.
    This meeting is open to credentialing software developers and 
data consultants.
    Agenda: The agenda will include an opening address on Web 
Technology and Interoperable Systems, and an overview of the FCP 
Program. Additional presentations include an Introduction to Data 
Exchange and expert panel presentations on trends in the Development 
of Standards for Health Care Data Exchange and The Standards 
Creation Process.
    This FCP meeting will convene other health care provider 
professional representatives for work group meetings to be held on 
Wednesday, July 12, and Thursday, July 13, 2000. The groups will 
identify the data elements required to credential their professions, 
and provide an exhibit forum for credentialing software 
manufacturers. The meeting will provide an open forum for 
credentialing data, developers and data consultants to discuss 
design for a new Health Level 7 software developers credentialing 
data exchange standard.
    For registration information, contact Linda White at 314-894-
5747 or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d5a454459484144436d415f43035b4c034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f4857564b5a5356517f534d5111495e11585049">[email protected]</span></a>
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.


[[Page 34490]]


    Dated: May 23, 2000.
Jane M. Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 00-13338 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 793.21 Exempt and nonexempt work.

Where an employee in the same workweek performs work which is exempt from the overtime requirements of the Act under section 13(b)(9), and also engages in work to which the overtime requirements apply, he is not exempt from overtime provisions of the Act in that week. (See *McComb* v. *Puerto Rico Tobacco Marketing Co-op Ass'n.,* 80 F. Supp. 953, affirmed, 181 F. 2d 697; *Mitchell* v. *Hunt,* 263 F. 2d 913; *Abram* v. *San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.,* 46 F. Supp. 969; *McComb* v. *del Valle,* 80 F. Supp. 945; *Walling* v. *Peacock Corp.,* 58 F. Supp. 880.) As explained in § 793.13, work which does not come within the occupational duties of an announcer, news editor, or chief engineer, or which is not related and incidental thereto, is not exempt work under section 13(b)(9). The mere isolated or occasional performance of insubstantial amounts of such nonexempt work will not defeat the exemption for the employee. Where, however, an employee, in a particular workweek, performs a substantial amount of nonexempt work to which the overtime provisions of the Act are applicable, the employee is not exempt under section 13(b)(9) in that workweek. For administrative purposes an employee who spends 20 percent or more of the hours he works in a workweek in such nonexempt work, will not be considered exempt under section 13(b)(9) in that workweek.
792 A.2d 594

#### In the Matter of Thomas R. HENDERSHOT.

No. 716 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Feb. 28, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2002, Thomas R. Hendershot having been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland by Order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland dated October 12, 2000; the said Thomas R. Hendershot having been directed on December 28, 2001, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Thomas R. Hendershot is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth consistent with the Order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland dated October 12, 2000, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
## **EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated February 12, 2007,accompanying the consolidated financial statements, schedule and management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingincluded in the Annual Report of MacDermid, Incorporated on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of MacDermid,Incorporated on Form S-8 (File No. 333-137253, effective September 12,2006, File No. 333-115971 effective May 28, 2004, FileNo. 333-66944 effective August 6, 2001 and File No. 333-66946effective August 6, 2001).
| /s/ GRANT THORNTON,LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
| Denver, Colorado       |   |
| February 12, 2007 |   |

 

----
#### § 778.317 Agreements not to pay for certain nonovertime hours.

An agreement not to compensate employees for certain nonovertime hours stands on no better footing since it would have the same effect of diminishing the employee's total overtime compensation. An agreement, for example, to pay an employee whose maximum hours standard for the particular workweek is 40 hours, $5 an hour for the first 35 hours, nothing for the hours between 35 and 40 and $7.50 an hour for the hours in excess of 40 would not meet the overtime requirements of the Act. Under the principles set forth in § 778.315, the employee would have to be paid $25 for the 5 hours worked between 35 and 40 before any sums ostensibly paid for overtime could be credited toward overtime compensation due under the Act. Unless the employee is first paid $5 for each nonovertime hour worked, the $7.50 per hour payment purportedly for overtime hours is not in fact an overtime payment.

[46 FR 7315, Jan. 23, 1981]
#### § 794.134 Distribution “for resale.”

A sale made to a customer engaged in the bulk distribution of petroleum products will be included in the 25 percent limitation only if the customer engages in the bulk distribution of petroleum products “for resale”. Except with respect to a specific exclusion in section 3(n) regarding certain building materials, the word “resale” is not defined in the Act. The common meaning of “resale” is the act of “selling again”. A sale is made for resale when the seller knows or has reasonable cause to believe that what is sold by him will be resold by the purchaser in the same or a different form. Where the sale is thus made for resale, it does not matter what ultimately happens to the subject of the sale. Thus, the fact that goods sold for resale are consumed by fire or no market is found for them and they are therefore never resold does not alter the character of the sale which is made for resale. In considering whether there is a sale of petroleum products for resale in any specific situation, the term “sale” includes, as defined in section 3(k) of the Act, “any sale, exchange, contract to sell, consignment for sale, shipment for sale, or other disposition.”