alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patron Systems, Inc. for the period
ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marie Meisenbach Graul, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, as adopted pursuant to
SS.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Marie Meisenbach Graul
----------------------------
Marie Meisenbach Graul
Chief Financial Officer



                                                                              27
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1095 Root River. ( a ) The draw of the Main Street bridge, mile 0.3 shall open on signal; except that, from April 1 through December 1 from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., the draw need be opened only on the hour, 20 minutes after the hour, and 40 minutes after the hour to pass all accumulated vessels; and, from December 2 through March 31, the draw shall open on signal if at least two hours notice is given. At all times, public vessels of the United States, state or local vessels used for public safety, commercial vessels, and vessels in distress shall be passed as soon as possible.
( b ) The draw of the State Street bridge, mile 0.5, shall open on signal; except that, from October 16 through April 30, the draw shall open on signal if at least two hours notice is given. At all times, public vessels of the United States, state or local vessels used for public safety, commercial vessels, and vessels in distress shall be passed as soon as possible.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3317

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael R. Petreikis

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul

____________

 Submitted: May 23, 2014 

Filed: May 30, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, MELLOY and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael R. Petreikis appeals the twelve-month prison sentence the district

court1

 imposed upon revoking his supervised release for the second time. See United

States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 825 (8th Cir. 2009) (affirming Petreikis’s first

1

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 
revocation sentence). Petreikis argues his sentence “was greater than necessary to

accomplish the goals of sentencing, and was therefore unreasonable.” In Petreikis’s

view, the district court “failed to give adequate weight to important factors,” including

Petreikis’s advanced age, failing health, efforts to improve the circumstances of his

supervised release before absconding, and the lack of “evidence that he committed any

new offenses” “[d]uring his absence from supervision.” Having carefully reviewed

the record, we conclude the district court properly considered the relevant sentencing

factors, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3), and did not impose an unreasonable

revocation sentence. See United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir.

2008); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923-24 (8th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B(1), (4). 

______________________________

-2-
#### § 810.500 Scope and purpose of this subpart.

Section 202A(e)(1) of the USMCA Implementation Act gives the Secretary, in conjunction with the Secretary of the Treasury, authority to verify whether a covered vehicle complied with the LVC requirements set forth in Article 7 of the Automotive Appendix, or if the producer is subject to the alternative staging regime, under Articles 7 and 8 of the Automotive Appendix. The Secretary's role in conducting verifications is limited to verifying compliance with the high-wage components of the LVC requirements. All matters other than the high-wage components of the LVC verification are outside of the Secretary's purview and are addressed in the Uniform Regulations and regulations and/or guidance issued by the Department of the Treasury, CBP, or other federal agencies.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 395 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 395

  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding National Pearl Harbor 
                            Remembrance Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2007

    Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Inhofe) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding National Pearl Harbor 
                            Remembrance Day.

Whereas on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Force attacked the 
        sovereign territory of the United States at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;
Whereas more than 2,400 United States service members and civilians were killed 
        in the attack on Pearl Harbor;
Whereas there are more than 4,900 members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors 
        Association;
Whereas the 66th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor will be December 7, 
        2007;
Whereas on August 23, 1994, Public Law 103-308 was enacted, designating December 
        7 of each year as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; and
Whereas section 129(b) of title 36, United States Code, requests that the 
        President issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of the 
        United States to observe National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities, and all departments, agencies, 
        and instrumentalities of the Federal Government, and interested 
        organizations, groups, and individuals, to fly the flag of the United 
        States at half-staff each December 7 in honor of the individuals who 
        died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, on the occasion of the 66th anniversary 
of the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, pays tribute 
to--
            (1) the United States service members and civilians who 
        died in the attack; and
            (2) the members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors Association.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24

                            THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.


                          DIRECTORS' POWER OF ATTORNEY
                          ----------------------------


         Each of the undersigned members of the Board of Directors of The Lamson
& Sessions Co., an Ohio Corporation, which anticipates filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., an annual report of the
Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1999 ("1998 Form
10-K") under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, does
hereby constitute and appoint James J. Abel and John B. Schulze, jointly and
severally, with full power and substitution and resubstitution, as attorney(s)
to sign for him and in his name, in the capacities indicated below, the 1998
Form 10-K, including any amendments and exhibits thereto, with full power and
authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever necessary and
required to be done in connection with such signing as fully to all intents and
purposes as he would do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving
the acts of said attorney(s) and any substitutes(s) therefor in connection with
such signing:


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of
the 25th day of February 1999.




/s/ James  T. Bartlett                  /s/ John C. Dannemiller   
------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
James T. Bartlett                       John C. Dannemiller
Director                                Director


/s/ Francis H. Beam, Jr.                /s/ George R. Hill
------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
Francis H. Beam, Jr.                    George R. Hill
Director                                Director


/s/ William H. Coquillette              /s/ A. Malachi Mixon, III  
------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
William H. Coquillette                  A. Malachi Mixon, III
Director                                Director


/s/ Martin J. Cleary                    /s/ John C. Morley
------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------
Martin J. Cleary                        John C. Morley
Director                                Director



                               /s/ D. Van Skilling
                               -----------------------------
                                 D. Van Skilling
                                    Director
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 266 

Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2007 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress. 

1 Resolved, That the following be the minority member2 ship on the following committees for the remainder of the 

3 110th Congress, or until their successors are appointed: 

4 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: 

5 Mr. Domenici, Mr. Craig, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Burr, Mr. 

6 DeMint, Mr. Corker, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 

7 Smith, Mr. Bunning, and Mr. Martinez. 

8 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS: 

9 Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Warner, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 

10 Vitter, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Craig, Mr. Alexander, and Mr. 

11 Bond. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

SRES 266 ATS 

1 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, 

2 Mr. Lott, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Smith, Mr. Bunning, 

3 Mr. Crapo, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Ensign. 

4 COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS: Ms. Murkowski, 

5 Mr. McCain, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Domenici, 

6 Mr. Smith, and Mr. Burr. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010.

2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### § 1.01-85 Redelegation.

Except as provided in § 1.01-80(e)(1) and (2), each Coast Guard officer to whom authority is granted in § 1.01-80 may redelegate and authorize successive redelegations of that authority within the command under the officer's jurisdiction, or to members of the officer's staff.

[CGD 91-225, 59 FR 66485, Dec. 27, 1994]
§ 106.280 Security incident procedures. For each MARSEC Level, the OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the Facility Security Officer (FSO) and OCS facility security personnel are able to: ( a ) Respond to security threats or breaches of security and maintain critical OCS facility and OCS facility-to-vessel interface operations;
( b ) Deny access to the OCS facility, except to those responding to an emergency;
( c ) Evacuate the OCS facility in case of security threats or breaches of security; and
( d ) Report security incidents as required in § 101.305 of this subchapter;
( e ) Brief all OCS facility personnel on possible threats and the need for vigilance, soliciting their assistance in reporting suspicious persons, objects, or activities; and
( f ) Secure non-critical operations in order to focus response on critical operations.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003; 68 FR 41917, July 16, 2003]
#### John Lean v. Joseph K. Andrews.

Filed January 3, 1894.

No. 5456.

Error Proceedings: Record for Review. Where a proceeding in error is prosecuted from the judgment of a justice of the peace to the district court, a petition in error must be filed in that court, specifically enumerating the errors relied on for a reversal of such judgment; and to enable the supreme court to review the judgment of the district court on said error proceeding, the petition in error, on which the district court acted, must be incorporated into the record brought here. ■

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. -

*H. D. Travis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wooley & Gibson, contra.*

Ragan, C.

It appears from the finding and judgment of the district court in this record that John Lean sued Joseph K. Andrews and others before a justice of the peace of Cass county; that the case was tried to a jury on January 17, 1891, and a verdict returned in favor of Andrews; that the justice of the peace afterwards set aside this verdict and on June 22, 1891, rendered a judgment in favor of Lean and against Andrews. Andrews then prosecuted a proceeding in error to the district court to reverse this judgment of June 22, 1891. The district court sustained the error proceeding, affirmed the judgment of January 17, 1891, and reversed the judgment of the justice of the peace rendered- on June 22, 1891. Lean brings the judgment of the district court here'for review on error.

. We cannot examine the errors alleged here by Lean, because the record contains no petition in error or other *657paper informing us what errors were alleged by Andrews in his error proceeding from the justice of the peace and on which Andrews invoked the action of the district court. Where a proceeding in error is prosecuted from' the judgment of a justice of the peace to the district court, a petition in error must be filed in that court specifically enumerating the errors relied upon for the reversal of the ruling or judgment of the justice of the peace; and to enable the supreme court to review the action of the district court on such error proceeding, such petition in error must be made a part of the record in the error proceeding brought here. . The record before us sustains the judgment of the district court, and the same is

Affirmed.
(LOGO) ARTHUR ANDERSEN


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholder of First Tennessee Mortgage Services, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion about First Tennessee Mortgage Services,
Inc.'s  (the  "Company")   compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing   standards
identified  in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform  Single
Attestation  Program  for  Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP) and that the Company had in
effect a fidelity  bond  policy in the amount of  $70,000,000  and an errors and
omissions  policy in the  amount  of  $50,000,000  as of and for the year  ended
December 31, 1999,  included in the accompanying  management  assertion  letter.
Management  is  responsible  for the  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum
servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on management's  assertion
about  the  Company's  compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  and
maintenance  of a fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policy  based on our
examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion, except for the matters disclosed therein, management's assertion
that the Company complied with the  aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards
and that the  Company  had in effect a  fidelity  bond  policy in the  amount of
$70,000,000  and an errors and omissions  policy in the amount of $50,000,000 as
of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, is fairly  stated,  in all material
respects.


Arthur Andersen LLP
Memphis, Tennessee,
February 28, 2000
#### FRANKLIN v. WRIGHT.

(Decided October 19, 1916.)

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court.

Heard before Hon. Hugh D. Merrill.

No counsel marked for either party.

Per curiam.

Appeal withdrawn.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maverick Minerals Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 20th day of August, 2002.

/s/ Robert Kinloch
Robert Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic Change Worksheet 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. 

## FAA_~20_IO--lo j

# I QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F4 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 

### 1

With whom outside theFAA hasthis proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA., ALPA, etc.)? Organization Person Contacted Date 

### ATA Joe While 8/1912009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master list to Verify That This isthe Correct Revision Before Use
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0207

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM071AD

737-57A1301, R2 --- 1/17/11

737-57A1301, R1 --- 9/24/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,292                  13,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,659                 139,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                       761                   1,847
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,413                 163,082
<PP&E>                                          10,342                  10,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                     750                   1,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,758                 215,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,907                 155,453
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           104                     104
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,747                  60,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,758                 215,608
<SALES>                                         51,787                   1,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,787                   1,699
<CGS>                                         (47,340)                 (1,527)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (47,340)                 (1,527)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,407)                 (3,437)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,821)                     251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,781)                 (3,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (220)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,001)                 (3,014)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.44)                  (0.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.44)                  (0.93)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-3415, 33-33153, 33-53155, 33-53897, 33-55317, 33-58787, 333-36909, 333-49195, 333-36846, 333-75848, 333-100234, 333-105161, 333-105162,
and 333-121604 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-33814 and 333-116138 on Form S-3 and No. 333-120576 on Form S-4 of our reports dated February 24, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin     
|February 24, 2006
#### § 452.116 Determining validity of ballots.

Generally, a labor organization has a right to establish reasonable rules for determining the validity of ballots cast in an election. However, where the union has no published guides for determining the validity of a voted ballot, it must count any ballot voted in such a way as to indicate fairly the intention of the voter. An entire ballot may not be voided because of a mistake made in voting for one of the offices on the ballot.