alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. JOSEPH H. BEUTTAS, ET AL., TRADING AS B-W CONSTRUCTION CO.

[No. 44978]

[101 C. Cls. 748 ; 324 U. S. 768]

Mr. Justice Roberts

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, holding that the Government had not availed itself of the option to set higher wage rates for the work covered by the contract nor was it the direct cause of the increase, since the fixing of a wage rate under another contract for a separate portion of the project at another time formed no basis for deliberate hindrance of performance of respondents’ contract.

As to the item of increased wage costs, the judgment of the Court of Claims was *reversed;*in other respects it was *affirmed.*
#### § 801.64 Notice of docketing.

The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall promptly notify the parties of the docketing of each matter.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]


Dialogues in Diversifying Clinical Trials: Successful Strategies 
for Engaging Women and Minorities in Clinical Trials

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
Office of Women's Health and Society for Women's Health Research 
jointly sponsored meeting: Dialogues in Diversifying Clinical Trials: 
Successful Strategies for Engaging Women and Minorities in Clinical 
Trials. The purpose of this symposium is to facilitate the broader 
discussion and dissemination of innovative strategies for increasing 
the recruitment and retention of women and minority subpopulations into 
clinical trials. The overarching goal of this symposium is to use a 
best practices learning exchange to share information and encourage 
successful methods and/or model implementation within a broad research 
community--industry, academia, and government.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 22, 2011, from 
8 a.m. to 9 a.m. (registration); 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. (program); 5:30 
p.m. to 6:30 p.m. (reception); and September 23, from 8 a.m. to 1:30 
p.m.
    Location: The meeting will be held at L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Contact: Deborah Kallgren, FDA Office of Women's Health, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 2314, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9442, Fax: 301-847-8604, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9efafbfcf1ecfff6b0f5fff2f2f9ecfbf0def8faffb0f6f6edb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c1c0c7cad7c4cd8bcec4c9c9c2d7c0cbe5c3c1c48bcdcdd68bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Registration: Registration is free, but seating is limited to 200. 
Registration will be accepted online and is available at http://www.swhr.org through September 16, 2011. For information regarding 
registration contact: Rachel Griffith, Society for Women's Health 
Research (SWHR), 1025 Connecticut Ave., NW., Suite 701, Washington, DC 
20036, 202-496-5001, Fax: 202-833-3472, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#136172707b767f5360647b613d7c6174"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e1c0f0d060b022e1d19061c40011c09">[email protected]</span></a>.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Rachel Griffith at least 7 days in advance.

    Dated: August 12, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-21042 Filed 8-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 485 

Relative to the death of Howard Metzenbaum, former United States Senator 

for the State of Ohio. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14 (legislative day, MARCH 13), 2008 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

AKAKA, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BAUCUS, 

Mr. BAYH, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURR, Mr. BYRD, Ms. 

CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mrs. 

CLINTON, Mr. COBURN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

CONRAD, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

DEMINT, Mr. DODD, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. 

HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KOHL, Mr. 

KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. MCCAIN, 

Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. MURKOWSKI, 

Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

OBAMA, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. REED, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. 

SALAZAR, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. 

SMITH, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SPECTER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. 

SUNUNU, Mr. TESTER, Mr. THUNE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WARNER, Mr. 

WEBB, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. WYDEN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of Howard Metzenbaum, former United 

States Senator for the State of Ohio. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

SRES 485 ATS 

Whereas Howard Metzenbaum served the people of Ohio with 

distinction for 8 years in the Ohio State Legislature; and 

Whereas Howard Metzenbaum served the people of Ohio with 

distinction for 18 years in the United States Senate: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound 

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death 

3 of the Honorable Howard Metzenbaum, former member 

4 of the United States Senate. 

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives 

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the 

8 deceased. 

9 Resolved, That when the Senate recesses today, it 

10 stand in recess as a further mark of respect to the memory 

11 of the Honorable Howard Metzenbaum. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00613-CV

Texas Department of Public Safety

v.

Jose Tovar Baez

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2017-CCL-00694

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment 

reinstating the ALJ’s suspension order. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellee, Jose Tovar Baez.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 29, 2018
§ 104.235 Vessel recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified in this section, the Vessel Security Officer must keep records of the activities as set out in paragraph (b) of this section for at least 2 years and make them available to the Coast Guard upon request.
( b ) Records required by this section may be kept in electronic format. If kept in an electronic format, they must be protected against unauthorized deletion, destruction, or amendment. The following records must be kept: ( 1 ) *Training.* For training under § 104.225, the date of each session, duration of session, a description of the training, and a list of attendees;
( 2 ) *Drills and exercises.* For each drill or exercise, the date held, description of drill or exercise, list of participants; and any best practices or lessons learned which may improve the Vessel Security Plan (VSP);
( 3 ) *Incidents and breaches of security.* Date and time of occurrence, location within the port, location within the vessel, description of incident or breaches, to whom it was reported, and description of the response;
( 4 ) *Changes in Maritime Security (MARSEC) Levels.* Date and time of notification received, and time of compliance with additional requirements;
( 5 ) *Maintenance, calibration, and testing of security equipment.* For each occurrence of maintenance, calibration, and testing, the date and time, and the specific security equipment involved;
( 6 ) *Security threats.* Date and time of occurrence, how the threat was communicated, who received or identified the threat, description of threat, to whom it was reported, and description of the response;
( 7 ) *Declaration of Security (DoS).* Manned vessels must keep on board a copy of the last 10 DoSs and a copy of each continuing DoS for at least 90 days after the end of its effective period;
( 8 ) *Annual audit of the VSP.* For each annual audit, a letter certified by the Company Security Officer or the VSO stating the date the audit was completed; and
( 9 ) *Electronic Reader/Physical Access Control System (PACS).* For each individual granted unescorted access to a secure area, the: FASC-N; date and time that unescorted access was granted; and, if captured, the individual's name. Additionally, documentation to demonstrate that the owner or operator has updated the Canceled Card List with the frequency required in § 101.525 of this subchapter.
( c ) Any records required by this part must be protected from unauthorized access or disclosure. TWIC reader records and similar records in a PACS are sensitive security information and must be protected in accordance with 49 CFR part 1520.
[USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39302, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60514, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57710, Aug. 23, 2016]
#### § 780.920 Workers transported must be fruit or vegetable harvest workers.

Clause (B) of section 13(b)(16) exempts only those transportation employees who are engaged in transportation “of persons employed or to be employed in the harvesting of fruits or vegetables.” Transportation of harvest workers is not exempt unless the workers are fruit and vegetable harvest workers; transportation of workers employed or to be employed in harvesting or other commodities is not exempt work under section 13(b)(16). *Wirtz* v. *Osceola Farms Co.,* 372 F. (2d) 584 (C.A. 5). Nor does the exemption apply to the transportation of persons for the purpose of planting or cultivating any crop, whether or not it is a fruit or a vegetable crop.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3599

_____________________________
M ARIA R ODGERS , Appellant,

v.

L AKE P ARK OF M ADISON S KILLED N URSING AND R EHABILITATION C ENTER a/k/a L AKE P ARK OF M ADISON S KILLED N URSING & R EHABILITATION C OMMUNITY ; L AKE P ARK O PERATIONS , LLC; L AKE P ARK H OLDINGS , LLC; H EALTHTIQUE G ROUP M ANAGEMENT , LLC; M AXIMUS H EALTHCARE G ROUP , LLC; L AKE P ARK M AX H OLDINGS , LLC; L AKE P ARK R EALTY , LLC; MHI H EALTHCARE , LLC; and M ADISON R EAL P ROPERTY VPC, LLC/ V ANTAGE P OINT C APITAL , Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County. William R. Slaughter, Judge.2 January 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. J AY , W INSOR

, and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Monica Taibl, Madison, for Appellant.
Ken Abele of Ausley McMullen, Tallahassee, for Appellees Healthtique Group Management, LLC and MHI Healthcare, LLC.
Caryn L. Bellus, Barbara E. Fox, and Brian L. Ellison of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Miami, for Appellees Lake Park of Madison Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center a/k/a Lake Park of Madison Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Community, Lake Park Operations, LLC, Lake Park Max Holdings, LLC, Maximus Healthcare Group, LLC, Lake Park Realty, LLC and Madison Real Property VPC, LLC/Vantage Point Capital.
Rockingham

No. 6999

#### State of New Hampshire Board of Registration for Land Surveyors v. Frank M. Emery, Jr.

July 31, 1975

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *John L. Ahlgren,*assistant attorney general (Mr. *Ahlgren*orally), for the plaintiff.

*J. Christopher McGuirk (Mr. McGuirk*orally) and *Flynn, Powell, McGuirk & Blanchard*and *Stephen L. Tober*for the defendant.

Per curiam.

The plaintiff petitioned the superior court in accordance with the provisions of RSA 319-A:25 (Supp. 1973) asking an injunction restraining the defendant from the practice of land surveying in the State of New Hampshire in violation of RSA ch. 319-A (Supp. 1973). The Trial Court *(Morris,*J.) found defendant in violation of RSA ch. 319-A (Supp. 1973) and permanently enjoined defendant from the practice of land surveying “until and unless he becomes registered as a land surveyor pursuant to the provisions of RSA 319-A (Supp. 1973).” The trial court reserved and transferred the defendant’s exceptions.

Defendant’s exceptions and the issues briefed by the parties concern the validity of RSA ch. 319-A (Supp. 1973) as it is applied to the defendant. However, because of certain events which are alleged to have occurred some months after the case was reserved and transferred to this court, it does not appear appropriate to determine the case upon the present state of the record.

Defendant’s brief asserts that he took the land surveyor’s qualify*414ing examination on June 1, 1974, and was notified in October of 1974 that he had qualified for certification as a surveyor in training. The defendant further states in his brief that he has returned his application and fee for such certification but that he still has not received his certificate. At the time of the trial in the superior court, the only facts before the court in relation to defendant’s qualifications were that he was a registered professional engineer in New Hampshire, a licensed land surveyor in Maine, and that in 1971 he had failed the land surveyors examination in New Hampshire.

If the facts alleged by the defendant are correct, he may now be entitled to registration. This would dispose of the case since the injunction is terminable upon the defendant becoming “registered as a land surveyor in the State of New Hampshire pursuant to the provisions of RSA 319-A (Supp. 1973).” We therefore remand the case to permit the superior court to determine whether the new issues raised by defendant are material or dispositive of the case. *Caron v. Labrie,*115 N.H. 20, 331 A.2d 155 (1975); *see Rautenberg v. Munnis,*107 N.H. 446, 224 A.2d 232 (1966).

*Remanded.*
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on her knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:    May 12, 2003



|
|
|
|



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Delta’s request to Boeing for a NTO

DESCRIPTION:

Based on a conference call with Boeing on October 15, Delta would like to request a NTO 

allowing an operational waiver to the WIFI restriction in the B737 cockpit. Delta is conducting a 

demonstration with the FAA where better turbulence information is provided in the cockpit to 

improve safety, efficiency and airspace capacity. 

The goal of the demo is to provide a tablet in the cockpit using the onboard WIFI to view a 

National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) web site. This site has a very robust 

turbulence forecast model overlaid with automated turbulence reports generated from the B737 

fleet using an algorithm to objectively generate the state of the atmosphere. Since the only 

aircraft at Delta that has WIFI and the turbulence algorithm is the B737NG, it would provide the 

best test platform for the demo. 

As Boeing is aware, the Phase 3 display had some issues during qualification tests with exposure 

to several Radio Frequencies. In conjunction with a STC (ST02541CH) obtained by AirCell LLC, 

Delta's WIFI provider, a restriction for using WIFI devices in the cockpit was issued for the 

B737NG. In information presented to Delta from Boeing, it appears a risk mitigation strategy 

using operational procedures can be put in place for any safety concerns. Delta is working 

primarily with the weather group in the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) and flight standards group 

of the FAA who helped develop the approach shown below: Delta, Boeing and the FAA in 

Washington have done independent Safety Risk Assessments on the issue with all three parties 

endorsing the use of WIFI in the cockpit. 

Background:

 All Phase 3 failures in service have been attributed to causes other than RF interference. 

 During laboratory qualification testing, the Phase 3 display recovered after the RF threats 

were removed, so the susceptibility findings were not considered failures.

 It appears the Airworthiness Directive (AD) being considered for the display issue is for 

an external threat unrelated to WIFI, although there seems to be some confusion with 

some of the Aircraft Cert. Offices (ACO) on this difference.

Results

 Typical WIFI RF emitting devices are not likely to disturb the displays.

 Worst case can be completely avoided by keeping the device a minimum distance of 7 

inches from the face of the Phase 3 display unit. 

 A single typical tablet device cannot affect all six devices at once.

Additional Mitigation strategy

 The crews will keep the tablet device a minimum of 7 inches from any display and 

discontinue its use and stow the device if any problems occur.

 Delta will only use 40 of its most highly qualified Line Check Pilots who will be thoroughly 

briefed on the strategy.

 The tablet will not be used during critical phases of flight and will be stowed with WIFI 

off below 10,000 feet.

Boeing engineering had No Technical Objection (NTO) to Delta's proposed plan of action in the

"Description" above.
f8k061312ex10i_keyuan.htm


Exhibit 10.1







KEYUAN PETROCHEMICALS, INC.


Qingshi Industrial Park


Ningbo Economic & Technological Development Zone


Ningbo, Zhejiang Province


P.R. China 315803







           June 13, 2012







Attn: Mr. Gerry Goldberg







Re:           Amendment to Independent Director Agreement







Dear Mr. Goldberg:







This letter shall act as an amendment to that certain Independent Director Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2011, between Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc. (“Keyuan” or the “Company”) and Mr. Gerry Goldberg (the “Independent Director”), regarding the Company’s engagement of the Independent Director as a non-employee director of the Company (the “Agreement”).







The Company and the Independent Director hereby confirm and agree that the Fees (as the term defined in Schedule A of the Agreement) payable on the last day of each calendar month to the Independent Director shall be $ 3,000, effective July 1, 2012. In the event that the Company goes private, Mr. Goldberg is entitled to receive additional fee of $3,000, payable upon the closing of the transaction of going private. In the event that the Company is uplisted to a higher exchange in the U.S. capital market, the Company and the Independent Director shall renegotiate to increase the Fees. Other than as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This amendment to the Agreement shall be effective as of the date first above written.







Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a signed copy to the Company.  Thank you.


 




	 	

Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 
	 	

KEYUAN PETROCHEMICALS, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Chunfeng Tao  	 
	 	Name:	Chunfeng Tao	 
	 	Title :	Chairman, President & CEO	 
	 	 	 	 







 


Accepted as of the date


first above written:


 




	
By: 

	/s/ Gerry Goldberg                                   	 
	Name: 	Gerry Goldberg	 







 


 1
#### CHARLES T. BELLINO, SR. *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 19360)

Lavery, Mihalakos and Daly, Js.

Submitted on briefs December 7, 1999

officially released January 4, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Purpose
 Administration
 Right to Defer Compensation
      1




---



##### 



Stock Deferral Accounts and Stock Matching Accounts
       (i)
    
    the product of (x) the dividend per Share which is payable with
respect to such dividend payment date, multiplied by (y) the number of whole and
fractional Units credited to the separate Stock Deferral Account and Stock
Matching Account, respectively, of the Participant as of such payment date;
 divided by
 (ii)
    
    the closing price of a Share on the dividend payment date (or if Shares were not traded
on that date, on the next preceding day
 2




---



##### 



Payment of Deferred Compensation
     3




---



##### 



Unforeseeable Emergency
 Non-assignability
 Interest of Participant
 4




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Amendment
 Plan Implementation
 Section 409A Transition Elections
 5
Order entered November 20, 2012

In The

No. 05-12-01509-CV JEFFERY & GERALLYNN LONGINO, Appellants V. WILLIAM R. EGAN, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006-2699-2012



### ORDER The Court has before it appellants’ November 15, 

### 2012 motion to request discretionary stay. The Court DENIES the motion.