alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 531.40 Payments to employee's assignee. ( a ) Where an employer is directed by a voluntary assignment or order of his employee to pay a sum for the benefit of the employee to a creditor, donee, or other third party, deduction from wages of the actual sum so paid is not prohibited: *Provided,* That neither the employer nor any person acting in his behalf or interest, directly or indirectly, derives any profit or benefit from the transaction. In such case, payment to the third person for the benefit and credit of the employee will be considered equivalent, for purposes of the Act, to payment to the employee.
( b ) No payment by the employer to a third party will be recognized as a valid payment of compensation required under the Act where it appears that such payment was part of a plan or arrangement to evade or circumvent the requirements of section 3(m) or subpart B of this part. For the protection of both employer and employee it is suggested that full and adequate record of all assignments and orders be kept and preserved and that provisions of the applicable State law with respect to signing, sealing, witnessing, and delivery be observed.
( c ) Under the principles stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, employers have been permitted to treat as payments to employees for purposes of the Act sums paid at the employees' direction to third persons for the following purposes: Sums paid, as authorized by the employee, for the purchase in his behalf of U.S. savings stamps or U.S. savings bonds; union dues paid pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement with bona fide representatives of the employees and as permitted by law; employees' store accounts with merchants wholly independent of the employer; insurance premiums (paid to independent insurance companies where the employer is under no obligation to supply the insurance and derives, directly or indirectly, no benefit or profit from it); voluntary contributions to churches and charitable, fraternal, athletic, and social organizations, or societies from which the employer receives no profit or benefit directly or indirectly.
(76 South. 999)

#### STREET v. CITY OF ANNISTON.

(7 Div. 444.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 1, 1917.)

Appeal from City Court of Anniston; Thos. W. Coleman, Jr., Judge.

S. W. Tate, of Anniston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal abated by death of appellee.
EXHIBIT (21)



LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





|                               |  |                               |  |                                               
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Name Under Which such Subsidiary Does Business
|                              
|                               |  |                              
|Lufkin Industries Canada, Ltd. |  | Province of Alberta, Canada   |  | Same                                          
|                               |  |                              
|P. T. Lufkin Indonesia         |  | Republic of Indonesia         |  | Same                                          
|                               |  |                              
|Lufkin Industries FSC, Corp    |  | Barbados                      |  | Same                                          
|                               |  |                              
|Lufkin Japan, L. L. C.         |  | Japan                         |  | Same                                          
|                               |  |                              
|Lufkin France, EURL            |  | France                        |  | Same                                          
|                               |  |                              
|Lufkin Argentina, S.A.         |  | Argentina                     |  | Same                                          
|                               |  |                              
|Lufkin Middle East             |  | Egypt                         |  | Same
(79 South. 143)

#### MULLINAX v. STATE.

(7 Div. 539.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 29, 1918.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;1094 — Appeal — Matters Review able.

Where no bills of exception have been filed, conviction will be affirmed, where no error is apparent in the record.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; J. E. Blackwood, Judge.

Gus Mullinax was convicted for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

J. S. Franklin, of Gadsden, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for grand larceny, and for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, (felony), was convicted for the latter offense, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty as above, following the verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant, sentencing him to a term of imimprisonment in the penitentiary as provided by law. The certificate of the trial judge shows that the time for filing a bill of exceptions expired, and none has been presented or filed.

■ There is no error apparent in the record; therefore the judgment of conviction is affirmed. (

Affirmed.
Trade name disclaimer

The use of trade names is for Identiflcatlon only and does not Imply

endorsement by the Publtc Health Service, U.S Department of Health an:!

Human Services

Copyright Information

Data in these charts, except for those in the International Aging section where

specific sources are given, are in the publlcdomaln and may be used and

reprinted without special permission; citation as to source, however, is

appreciated.

Suggested Citation

Cohen RA, Van Nostrand JF, and Furrier SE, eds. Chartbookon health data on

older Americans: Unted States, 1992. National Center for Health Statistics Vital

Health Stat 3(29). 1993.

Library of Congress Catsloging-in-Publication Dafa

Chartbook onhealth data onolder Americans : United States, 1992.

p. cm, – (V]tal and health statistics. Serles3, Analytical and

epidem]ological studies ; no. 29] (DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 93-1413)

Edited by Robin A. Cohen, Joan F. Van Nostrand, Sylvia E. Furrier.

Companion v. to: Health data on older Americans.

Includes bibliographical references.

ISBN 0-8406 -0475-0

I, Aged– Health and hygiene –United States –Statistics –Charls,

diagrams, etc. 2. Aged–Medical care– Un!ted States–Statistics–-Charts,

diagrams, etc. 3. United States – Statistics, Medical – Charts, diagrams, etc. i

Cohen, Robin A. Il. Van Nostrand, Joan F. Ill. Furrier, Sylvia. IV. National

Center for Health Statistics (U.S.) V. Health data on older Americans. VI,

Series. VII, Seties: DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 93-1413.

[DNLM: 1 Health Services for the Aged – utilization – Urmted

States –charts. 2, Health Status–United States– charts. 3. Health

Surveys – United States –charts. W2 A N148VC no.29]

RA408.A3H4 1992 Suppl.

362.1 ‘9897’00973021 – dc20

DNLM/DLC

for Library of Congress 92-48231

CIP

For sale by the U.S. Government Prlntlng Office

Superintendent of Documents

Mail Stop: SSOP

Washington, DC 20402-9328
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics 

The initial meeting of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee will be held on June 15, 2000 in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue N.E., Washington, DC. 

The Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee is a technical committee composed of economists, statisticians, and behavioral scientists who are recognized for their attainments and objectivity in their respective fields. Committee members will be called upon to analyze issues involved in producing Federal economic statistics and recommend practices that will lead to optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and cooperation among the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census. 

The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1 and 2 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows: 

9:00 Opening Session 

1. Purpose of the Committee 

2. Introduction of members and statements of their research interests 

3. Committee operating procedures 

10:15 The Measurement of E-commerce 

1:00 Service Sector Measurement: The Case of Banking 

2:45 Bureau of the Census and Bureau of Labor Statistics Establishment Lists 

                        3:45 Ethics, Rules and Regulations                               ( print page 34235)    

4:15 Future Agenda Topics 

5:00 Conclude (approximate time) 

The meeting is open to the public. It is suggested that persons planning to attend the meeting as observers contact Margaret Johnson, Federal Economic Research Advisory Committee, on Area Code (202) 691-5600. Persons needing special assistance such as sign language interpretation or other special accommodation in order to attend the meeting are asked to contact Ms. Johnson at least two days prior to the meeting date. 

Signed at Washington, D.C. the 19th day of May 2000.

Katharine G. Abraham, 

Commissioner of Labor Statistics. 

[FR Doc. 00-13248 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRENDA MORRIS REEVES and RONALD REEVES
, Appellant s ,

v.

ROFEGO MOTORS, INC.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1371

[ December 21, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Frank S. Castor , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2022

- SC

002034

- XXXX

- MB

.

Brenda M. Reeves, Vero Beach, pro se.

Alan L. Raines and Elizabeth Jimenez of Raines Legal, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 780.919 Engagement “in transportation” of harvest workers.

In order for the exemption to apply, the employees must be engaged “in transportation” of the specified harvest workers between the points stated in the statute. Actual engagement “in transportation” of such workers is required. Engagement in other activities is not exempt work. Drivers, driver's helpers, and others who are engaged in the actual movement of the persons transported may qualify for the exemption. Office employees, garage mechanics, and other employees of the employer who may perform supporting activities but do not engage in the actual transportation work do not come within the exemption. There is no restriction in the statute as to the means of conveyance used; the exempt transportation may be by land, air, or water in any vehicle or conveyance appropriate for the purpose. Employees of any employer who are engaged in the specified transportation activities may qualify for exemption; it is not necessary that the transportation be performed by the farmer. (See § 780.905.)
##### 



(1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick

James L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 28, 2007
  (1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ Charles P. Cooley

Charles P. CooleyChief Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2007
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Stephen P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve P. Foster, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.




/s/ Stephen P. Wilson               /s/ Steve P. Foster
-----------------------             -----------------------
Stephen P. Wilson                   Steve P. Foster
Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 3, 2003


                                  -33-
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors

Summa Industries:

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8pertaining to the Company’s 1991 Stock Option Plan filed on April 15,1993, and to file numbers 333-20835, 333-68921, 333-68981, 333-87692, 333-35163, 333-38415, 333-68983, 333-78873, 333-87690and 333-129397 of Summa Industries and subsidiaries of our reports dated October 19,2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,which appear in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Los Angeles, California        |
| November 7, 2005          |

 

----
Exhibit 24-a

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of Richard R. Roscitt and Robert E. Switz, with full
power to each to act without the other, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the 'Company') for the Company's fiscal year ended October 31, 2002, and any or all amendments to said Annual
Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to file the same with such other authorities as
necessary, granting unto each such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons on the dates indicated below their names.

|/s/ Robert AnnunziataRobert Annunziata         |  | /s/ Jean-Pierre RossoJean-Pierre Rosso
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date:                                          |  | 12/24/02                              
|/s/ John A. Blanchard IIIJohn A. Blanchard III |  | /s/ Larry W. WangbergLarry W. Wangberg
|Date:                                          |  | 12/21/02                              
|/s/ John J. Boyle IIIJohn J. Boyle III         |  | /s/ John D. WunschJohn D. Wunsch      
|Date:                                          |  | 12/20/02                              
|/s/ James C. CastleJames C. Castle             |  | /s/ Charles D. YostCharles D. Yost    
|Date:                                          |  | 12/20/02                              
|/s/ B. Kristine JohnsonB. Kristine Johnson     |  |                                       
|Date:                                          |  | 12/30/02                              

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 4.24


 


Supplementary Agreement to


The Amended
and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement


 


This supplementary agreement (hereinafter,
the “Agreement”) is entered into by and among the following parties in Beijing on April 7, 2015.


 


Party A: AirMedia Technology (Bejing) Co.,
Ltd.


 


Party B: Beijing Shengshi Lianhe Advertising
Co., Ltd.


 


Party C: AirMedia Group Co., Ltd.


 


(All the above parities are referred to
collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”)


 


WHEREAS, 


(1) under the Amended and Restated
Equity Interest Pledge Agreement and its supplementary agreements (hereinafter, the “Original Pledge Agreement”) executed
by Party A, Party B, Party C and other shareholders of Party C, Party B has pledged all 96.76% of the equity interest of Party
C it held to Party A.


 


(2) for the development of business, Party
B proposes to transfer 5% of the equity interest of Party C to Shenzhen Liantronics Co., Ltd.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, through amicable
negotiations, Party A, Party B and Party C hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Party A agrees that Party B transfers 5% of the equity interest of Party C to Shenzhen Liantronics
Co., Ltd. (the “Equity Interest Transfer”). After the completion of the Equity Interest Transfer, the remaining
91.76% of the equity interest of Party C held by Party B shall remain subject to the Original Pledge Agreement. Party A and Party
B shall promptly register for such pledge.



		2.	Upon the effectiveness of this Agreement, in the event of any inconsistency between the Original
Pledge Agreement and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail among Party A, Party B and Party C. Other matters that are not
covered in this Agreement shall remain subject to the Original Pledge Agreement.



		3.	This Agreement is effective and binding upon the signatures or stamps of all Parties have been
signed or affixed. This Agreement is executed in three copies. Each party shall hold one copy. Each copy shall be equally binding.



 


[THE REMAINDER
OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


 


[Signature
Page]


 


 


Party A: AirMedia
Technology (Bejing) Co., Ltd. (sealed)


 


 


Party B: Beijing
Shengshi Lianhe Advertising Co., Ltd. (sealed)


 


 


Party C: AirMedia
Group Co., Ltd. (sealed)
§ 471.3 What exceptions apply and what exemptions are available? ( a ) *Exceptions for specific types of contracts.* The requirements of this part do not apply to any of the following: ( 1 ) Collective bargaining agreements as defined in the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, entered into by an agency and the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate unit to set terms and conditions of employment of those employees.
( 2 ) Government contracts that involve purchases below the simplified acquisition threshold set by Congress under the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act. Therefore, the employee notice clause need not be included in government contracts for purchases below that threshold, provided that ( i ) No agency or contractor is permitted to procure supplies or services in a manner designed to avoid the applicability of the Order and this part; and
( ii ) The employee notice clause must be included in government contracts for indefinite quantities, unless the contracting agency or contractor has reason to believe that the amount to be ordered in any year under such a contract will be less than the simplified acquisition threshold set in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act.
( 3 ) Government contracts resulting from solicitations issued before the effective date of this rule.
( 4 ) Subcontracts of $10,000 or less in value, except that contractors and subcontractors are not permitted to procure supplies or services in a manner designed to avoid the applicability of the Order and this part.
( 5 ) Contracts and subcontracts for work performed exclusively outside the territorial United States.
( b ) *Exemptions for certain contracts.* The Director of OLMS may exempt a contracting department or agency or groups of departments or agencies from the requirements of this part with respect to a particular contract or subcontract or any class of contracts or subcontracts when the Director finds that either: ( 1 ) The application of any of the requirements of this part would not serve its purposes or would impair the ability of the Government to procure goods or services on an economical and efficient basis; or
( 2 ) Special circumstances require an exemption in order to serve the national interest.
( c ) *Procedures for requesting an exemption and withdrawals of exemptions.* Requests for exemptions under this subsection from a contracting department or agency must be in writing, and must be directed to the Director of OLMS, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-5603, Washington, DC, 20210. The Director of OLMS may withdraw an exemption granted when, in the Director's judgment, such action is necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of this part.