alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 110.129b Island of Oahu, Hawaii. (Datum: OHD)

(a) *Kaneohe Bay.*

(1) The waters of Kaneohe Bay enclosed by a line beginning at 21°26′28′′ N. latitude, 157°46′00′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°26′00′′ N. latitude, 157°46′14′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°26′20′′ N. latitude, 157°47′24′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°27′00′′ N. latitude, 157°48′25′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°26′46′′ N. latitude, 157°48′37′′ W. longitude; thence along the shoreline to the beginning point.

(b) *Kaneohe Bay*

(2) . The waters of Kaneohe Bay enclosed by a line beginning at 21°27′28′′ N. latitude, 157°49′08′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°28′10′′ N. latitude, 157°50′03′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°29′10′′ N. latitude, 157°50′40′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°30′46′′ N. latitude, 157°50′14′′ W. longitude; thence along the shoreline to the beginning point.

(c) *Keehi Lagoon.* The waters of Keehi Lagoon bounded by a line connecting the following points:

| Latitude | Longtitude |
| --- | --- |
| 21°19′35.0′′ N | 157°54′06.0′′ W |
| 21°19′37.7′′ N | 157°53′58.0′′ W |
| 21°19′06.4′′ N | 157°53′41.9′′ W |
| 21°19′00.8′′ N | 157°53′44.1′′ W |
| 21°18′59.9′′ N | 157°53′49.7′′ W |
| 21°19′04.9′′ N | 157°53′50.0′′ W |

and thence to the point of beginning.

(d) *Sans Souci Beach.* The waters of Sans Souci Beach enclosed by a line beginning at 21°15′49′′ N. latitude, 157°49′31′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°15′49.2′′ N. latitude, 157°49′29′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°15′56.2′′ N. latitude, 157°49′31′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°15′56′′ N. latitude, 157°49′33′′ W. longitude; thence to the beginning point.

(e) *Iroquois Point Lagoon.* The waters of Iroquois Point Lagoon enclosed by a line beginning at 21°19′53′′ N. latitude, 157°58′30′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°19′56′′ N. latitude, 157°58′31′′ W. longitude; thence along the shoreline to the beginning point.

(f) *Hickam AFB Marina*

(1) *a.* The waters of Hickam AFB Marina enclosed by a line beginning at 21°19′13′′ N. latitude, 157°57′40′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°18′45′′ N. latitude, 157°57′40′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°18′45′′ N. latitude, 157°57′28.5′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°19′10′′ N. latitude, 157°57′28.5′′ W. longitude; thence along the shoreline to the beginning point.

(g) *Hickam AFB Marina*

(2) . The waters of Hickam AFB Marina enclosed by a line beginning at 21°19′11′′ N. latitude, 157°57′10′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°18′46.2′′ N. latitude, 157°57′20′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°18′46.2′′ N. latitude, 157°57′05.2′′ W. longitude; thence along the shoreline to the beginning point.

(h) *Aiea Bay.* The waters of Aiea Bay enclosed by a line beginning at 21°22′20′′ N. latitude, 157°56′30′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°22′27′′ N. latitude, 157°56′40.5′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°22′30′′ N. latitude, 157°56′40.5′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°22′37′′ N. latitude, 157°56′22.5′′ W. longitude; thence to 21°22′37′′ N. latitude, 157°56′19′′ W. longitude; thence along the shoreline to the beginning point.

[CGD 76-186, 42 FR 62001, Dec. 8, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 21881, May 22, 1978; CGD14-90-01, 56 FR 13762, Apr. 4, 1991. Redesignated by USCG-2018-0533, 85 FR 8173, Feb. 13, 2020]
§ 4003.3 PBGC assistance in obtaining information. ( a ) *General.* A person may request PBGC's assistance in obtaining information if the person lacks information necessary— ( 1 ) To file a request for review pursuant to subpart C or D of this part, or to decide whether to seek review; or
( 2 ) To participate in an appeal pursuant to § 4003.57, or to decide whether to participate in an appeal.
( b ) *Information not in PBGC's possession.* A person may request PBGC's assistance in obtaining information in the possession of a party other than PBGC. The request must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) State or describe the missing information, the reason why the person needs the information, and the reason why the person needs the assistance of PBGC in obtaining the information; and
( 3 ) Be submitted to the Appeals Board or the department that is responsible for reviewing the initial determination under this part. If the determination is subject to reconsideration, see § 4003.33 for information on where to submit the request for assistance. If the determination is subject to review by appeal, see § 4003.53 for information on where to submit the request.
( c ) *Information in the possession of PBGC.* A person may request information in the possession of PBGC pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act and part 4901 of this chapter or the Privacy Act and part 4902 of this chapter, as applicable. See parts 4901 and 4902 of this chapter for additional information. Nothing in this paragraph (c) limits or amends the requirements under part 4901 or 4902 of this chapter.
[85 FR 10283, Feb. 24, 2020]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00473-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 141st District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 141-329967-21

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JERALD H. MILLER, JR., Appellant

V.

TARRANT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant’s brief in this accelerated appeal was originally due April 3, 2023. 

The court granted three extensions to this deadline, but appellant’s brief was never 

filed. On September 25, 2023, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as 

the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with 

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Instead of filing a brief and motion as directed, appellant 

submitted another request for extension of time. Appellant’s request is DENIED.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 5, 2023
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 33 

Recognizing the benefits and importance of school-based music education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2007 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. DODD, and Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the benefits and importance of school-based 

music education. 

Whereas school music programs enhance intellectual development and enrich the academic environment for students 

of all ages; 

Whereas students who participate in school music programs 

are less likely to be involved with drugs, gangs, or alcohol, and have better attendance in school; 

Whereas the skills gained through sequential music instruction, including discipline and the ability to analyze, solve 

problems, communicate, and work cooperatively, are vital 

for success in the 21st century workplace; 

Whereas the majority of students attending public schools in 

inner city neighborhoods have virtually no access to 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 33 IS 

music education, which places them at a disadvantage 

compared to their peers in other communities; 

Whereas the arts are a core academic subject, and music is 

an essential element of the arts; and 

Whereas every student in the United States should have an 

opportunity to reap the benefits of music education: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that music 

3 education grounded in rigorous instruction is an impor4 tant component of a well-rounded academic curriculum 

5 and should be available to every student in every school 

6 in the United States. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132465 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

AHMED HARAJLI and FATMA HARAJLI,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132465 

 COA: 262651 

Wayne CC: 01-130236-CK

KHALIL HARAJLI, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
|   | (i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the      period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March      13, 2009 |   /s/      THEODORE STALICK                 |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   Theodore      Stalick, Vice President and |
|                           |   Chief      Financial Officer              |
----

**Exhibit 32**

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF  TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their knowledge: 

(1) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|                             |        |                                                                                                                                                                |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: :  May 14, 2008 |   | ___/s/ Yanlin Han      __________________Yanlin Han

Chief Executive Officer                                                          |
| Dated: :  May 14, 2008 |   | ___/s/  Garry Wong               _______

Garry Wong        Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 100.170 Special Local Regulation; Breakers to Bridge Paddle Festival, Lake Superior, Keweenaw Waterway, MI. ( a ) *Location.* All navigable waters of the Keweenaw Waterway beginning at the North Entry at position 47°14′03′′ N., 088°37′53′′ W.; and ending at the Portage Lake Lift Bridge at position 47°07′25′′ N., 088°34′26′′ W.
( b ) *Effective period.* This annual event historically occurs within the first or second week of September. The Captain of the Port Duluth (COTP) will announce enforcement dates via Notice of Enforcement, Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, on-scene designated representatives, or other means of outreach.
( c ) *Regulations.* Vessels transiting within the regulated area shall travel at a no-wake speed except as may be permitted by the COTP or a designated on-scene representative. Additionally, vessels shall yield right-of-way for event participants and event safety craft and shall follow directions given by event representatives during the event.
[USCG-2017-0170, 82 FR 27112, June 14, 2017]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 243 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Clean Beaches Week and the 

considerable value of beaches and their role in American culture. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2007 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. DOLE, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BURR, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. 

MURKOWSKI, Mr. KERRY, Ms. SNOWE, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LOTT, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

CARPER, and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Clean Beaches 

Week and the considerable value of beaches and their 

role in American culture. 

Whereas coastal areas produce 85 percent of all United 

States tourism dollars and are the leading tourism destination in America; 

Whereas over 50 percent of the population of the United 

States lives in coastal counties; 

Whereas the beaches in these coastal counties provide recreational opportunities for numerous Americans and their 

families who, together with international tourists, make 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 243 ATS 

almost 2,000,000,000 trips to the beach each year to 

fish, sunbathe, boat, swim, surf, and bird-watch; 

Whereas beaches are a critical driver of the American economy and its competitiveness in the global economy; 

Whereas beaches represent a critical part of our natural heritage and a beautiful part of the American landscape; 

Whereas beaches are sensitive ecosystems, susceptible to degradation and alteration from natural forces, sea level rise, 

pollution, untreated sewage, and improper use; 

Whereas members of the Government, the private sector, and 

nongovernmental organizations, along with citizen volunteers, have worked diligently to clean up and protect our 

beaches over the years; 

Whereas great strides have been made in understanding the 

science of watersheds and the connections between inland 

areas and coastal waters; 

Whereas the Federal Government should develop sciencebased policies that are commensurate with that knowledge; and 

Whereas a 7-day week, commencing in June and including 

July 5, will be observed as National Clean Beaches Week: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Clean Beaches Week; 

4 (2) recognizes the value of beaches to the Amer5 ican way of life and the important contributions of 

6 beaches to the economy, recreation, and natural en7 vironment of the United States; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 243 ATS 

1 (3) encourages Americans to work to keep 

2 beaches safe and clean for the continued enjoyment 

3 of the public and to engage in activities during Na4 tional Clean Beaches Week that foster stewardship, 

5 healthy living, and volunteerism along our coastlines. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Program Instructions

AOA-PI-98-03 - August 4, 1998

TO : STATES ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 

1965, AS AMENDED

SUBJECT :Procedures for Issuing Title III Formula Grant Amendments for Transfer of Funds

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES : Older Americans Act, as Amended - Sections 

308(b)(4)(A), 308(b)(4)(B), 308(b)(5)(A), 308(b)(5)(B)(i) and (ii),308(b)(5)(C)

The purpose of this Program Instruction is to reiterate procedures for transferring of funds within the 

Title III allotments and the Administration on Aging (AoA) issuing of grant award amendments for the 

same.

As you know, the Older Americans Act provides authority for states to make various transfers of funds 

between allotments for Supportive Services and Senior Centers (III-B), Congregate Meals (III-C1), 

and Home-Delivered Meals (III-C2). There is, however, no authority for states to transfer funds in or 

out of the allotments for In-Home Services for Frail Individuals, and Disease Prevention or the 

Ombudsman Program.

States can make transfers, whenever necessary, throughout the fiscal year between the III-B, III-C1 

and III-C2 allotments. In order to keep the workload of transfers at a minimum, a policy was 

established for states to notify AoA only once a year for:

(1) transfers of up to 30 percent between III-C1 and III-C2 as provided in Section 308(b)(4)(A); and 

(2) transfers of up to 20 percent between III-B, and III-C, as provided in Section 308(b)(5)(A).

Although these transfers may be made whenever necessary, they should be reflected on Item 10.o, 

column 3 (Total Cumulative Federal Funds Authorized) of the Financial Status Report (SF-269) on the 

semi-annual reports. The cumulative transfer of funds between allotments, however, will not be 

reflected on a revised Grant Award until after the reallotment (if there is one).

Transfers within III-C which exceed 30 percent [Section 308(b)(4)(B) allows up to an additional 10 

percent this fiscal year] of the state's separate allotment for III-C1 or III-C2, and transfers between 

III-B and III-C which exceed 20 percent 
[Section 308(b)(5)(B)(ii) allows up to an additional eight percent this fiscal year] of the state's 

separate allotment for III-B or III-C, require AoA's prior approval and should be reflected on the SF269 after approval. If the state agency is proposing to transfer funds requiring approval for this fiscal 

year, a request must be received on or before September 25, 1998. State agencies will be notified by 

letter of AoA's approval or disapproval to transfer funds. All transfers for this fiscal year must be made 

before September 30, 1998. Any transfers reflected on the SF-269 after the close of the fiscal year 

must be supported by documentation which indicates that the transfers were approved or made prior 

to the close of the fiscal year.

Jeanette C. Takamura

Assistant Secretary for Aging

DUE DATE: September 25, 1998, for submission to the Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS 

regional offices.

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS regional offices.
§ 810.140 High-wage transportation or related costs for shipping a high-wage part or material. ( a ) High-wage transportation or related costs for shipping a high-wage part or material within the USMCA Countries may be used to calculate high-wage material and manufacturing costs if those costs are not otherwise included in the annual purchase value.
( b ) Where the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section are met, the producer may claim in its calculation of high-wage material and manufacturing expenditures high-wage transportation or related costs for shipping a high-wage part or material within the USMCA Countries, for each transportation, logistics, or material handling provider that paid an average hourly base wage rate of at least US$16 per hour to its direct production workers performing these services. Such workers would include drivers and loaders.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134128 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan VIVIAN JOHNSON, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134128 COA: 271705 Oakland CC: 2005-066404-CZ MILLENNIUM TREATMENT SERVICES, L.L.C., DARLENE KAKOS, and JUNE ABRAHAM, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20170 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICKY LAMAR FAULK, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-871-2

-------------------- October 17, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricky Lamar Faulk appeals the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and to obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503(a)(b)(3) and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. Faulk’s argument that the district court erred when it attributed 1.4 grams of methamphetamine to him without a finding of facts on the record given that no drug amount was set forth in theNo. 02-20170 -2- indictment fails because his sentence was within the statutory maximum. United States v. Clinton , 256 F.3d 311, 314 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 492 (2001). Likewise, Faulk’s argument that the district court did not comply with F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32 because it did not make fact findings on the quantity of drugs attributable to Faulk fails because the district court expressly adopted the Presentence Report which clearly set forth the basis for the amount of drugs attributable to Faulk. United States v.
Duncan , 191 F.3d 575-76 (5th Cir. 1999). Faulk’s motion to adopt the brief of his codefendant, Steve Keel, is DENIED. The sentence imposed by the district court is
AFFIRMED.
§ 106.310 Submission requirements. ( a ) A completed FSA report must be submitted with the Facility Security Plan (FSP) required in § 106.410 of this part.
( b ) An OCS facility owner or operator may generate and submit a report that contains the FSA for more than one OCS facility subject to this part, to the extent that they share similarities in physical characteristics, location and operations.
( c ) The FSA must be reviewed and validated, and the FSA report must be updated each time the FSP is submitted for reapproval or revisions.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60558, Oct. 22, 2003]
#### § 793.19 Workweek is used in applying the exemption.

The unit of time to be used in determining the application of the exemption under section 13(b)(9) to an employee is the workweek. (See *Overnight Motor Transportation Co.* v. *Missel,* 316 U.S. 572; *McComb* v. *Puerto Rico Tobacco Marketing Co-op Ass'n.,* 80 F. Supp. 953, affirmed, 181 F. 2d 697.) A workweek is a fixed and regularly recurring period of 7 consecutive 24-hour periods. It may begin at any hour of any day set by the employer and need not coincide with the calendar week. Once the workweek has been set it commences each succeeding week on the same day and at the same hour. The workweek may not be changed for the purpose of evading the requirements of the Act.