alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of Disability Employment Program

# AGENCY:

Office of Disability Employment Policy, Department of Labor.

# ACTION:

Correction to the Funding Opportunity Number and Closing Date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Office of Disability Employment Policy, Department of Labor is correcting the New Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for Cooperative Agreements published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 4, 2011 at 76 FR 150. Specifically, we are correcting the Funding Opportunity Number to SGA 11-05 and the Closing Date for receipt of applications to September 2, 2011. The full Solicitation for Grant Applications is posted on                         *http://www.grants.gov*                         under U.S. Department of Labor/ODEP. If you need to speak to a person concerning these grants, you may telephone Cassandra Mitchell at 202-693-4570 (not a toll-free number).                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August 2011.

Cassandra R. Mitchell,

Grant Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-20211 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
§ 810.110 Examples of direct production work. ( a ) Direct production work includes production of passenger vehicles, light trucks, or heavy trucks, or parts for these vehicles, as well as the set-up, operation or maintenance of tools or equipment used in the production of those vehicles and parts. The work may take place on a production line, at a workstation, on the shop floor, or in another production area. Direct production work includes material handling of vehicles or parts; inspections of vehicles or parts, including inspections that are normally categorized as quality control and, for heavy trucks, pre-sale inspections carried out at the place where the vehicle is produced; on-the-job training regarding the execution of a specific production task; and maintaining and ensuring the operation of the production line or production area and the operation of tools and equipment used in the production of vehicles or parts, including the cleaning of the line or production area and the places around it.
( b ) Except for workers described in § 810.130, time spent (by, for example, line supervisors and team leads) providing on-the-job training regarding the execution of a specific production task or relieving a worker in the performance of direct production duties is direct production work. Time spent managing or supervising workers is not direct production work.
#### § 785.24 Principles noted in Portal-to-Portal Bulletin.

In November, 1947, the Administrator issued the Portal-to-Portal Bulletin (part 790 of this chapter). In dealing with this subject, § 790.8 (b) and (c) of this chapter said:

(b) The term “principal activities” includes all activities which are an integral part of a principal activity. Two examples of what is meant by an integral part of a principal activity are found in the report of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate on the Portal-to-Portal bill. They are the following:

(1) In connection with the operation of a lathe, an employee will frequently, at the commencement of his workday, oil, grease, or clean his machine, or install a new cutting tool. Such activities are an integral part of the principal activity, and are included within such term.

(2) In the case of a garment worker in a textile mill, who is required to report 30 minutes before other employees report to commence their principal activities, and who during such 30 minutes distributes clothing or parts of clothing at the workbenches of other employees and gets machines in readiness for operation by other employees, such activities are among the principal activities of such employee.

Such preparatory activities, which the Administrator has always regarded as work and as compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act, remain so under the Portal Act, regardless of contrary custom or contract.

(c) Among the activities included as an integral part of a principal activity are those closely related activities which are indispensable to its performance. If an employee in a chemical plant, for example, cannot perform his principal activities without putting on certain clothes, changing clothes on the employer's premises at the beginning and end of the workday would be an integral part of the employee's principal activity. On the other hand, if changing clothes is merely a convenience to the employee and not directly related to his principal activities, it would be considered as a “preliminary” or “postliminary” activity rather than a principal part of the activity. However, activities such as checking in and out and waiting in line to do so would not ordinarily be regarded as integral parts of the principal activity or activities.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Employment of Women in the Pineapple Canneries of Hawaii

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Manning, Caroline, 1876-1966. 						*The Employment of Women in the Pineapple Canneries of Hawaii : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 82*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1930,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5390,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 21 

Recognizing the uncommon valor of Wesley Autrey of New York, New York. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2007 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JANUARY 25, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

JANUARY 26, 2007 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the uncommon valor of Wesley Autrey of New 

York, New York. 

Whereas Wesley Autrey is a citizen of New York, New York; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey is a veteran of the United States 

Navy; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey has been a member in good standing 

of the Construction and General Building Laborers’ 

Local 79 since 1996; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey witnessed a fellow subway passenger 

suffer from a seizure and fall onto the train tracks; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

SRES 21 ATS 

Whereas Wesley Autrey was compelled by his belief that he 

should ‘‘do the right thing’’ and serve as an example to 

his 2 young daughters; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey demonstrated uncommon valor and 

tremendous bravery in diving onto the train tracks to 

save the life of his fellow subway passenger only moments 

before an incoming train passed over them; 

Whereas the beneficiary of Wesley Autrey’s courageous actions is now recovering at St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital 

Center, New York; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey has conducted himself with the utmost humility in the midst of his newfound fame; and 

Whereas Wesley Autrey stands out as an example of selflessness to members of his community, his State, and the 

Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that Wesley Autrey acted hero3 ically by putting his own life at risk to save that of 

4 his fellow citizen; and 

5 (2) expresses its deep appreciation for Wesley 

6 Autrey’s example and the values that his actions 

7 represent. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
§ 71.12 Use and collection of social security numbers. ( a ) Each component unit that requests an individual to disclose his social security account number shall provide the individual, in writing, with the following information: ( 1 ) The statute, regulation, Executive Order or other authority under which the number is solicited;
( 2 ) Whether the disclosure is mandatory or voluntary; and
( 3 ) The consequences, if any, to the individual should he or she refuse or fail to disclose the number.
( b ) Neither the Department nor any of its component units shall, in the absence of specific federal statutory authority, deny to an individual any right, benefit or privilege provided by law solely because of such individual's refusal to disclose his social security account number.
( c ) The head of each component unit shall ensure that employees authorized to collect social security account numbers or tax identifying numbers, are aware of the statutory or other basis for collecting such information, of the uses to which such numbers may be put, and of the consequences, if any, that might follow if a person refuses to disclose the requested number.
**Docket EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0870**

**South Dakota Regional Haze Proposal Section III.B Visibility Conditions Corrections**  **Corrections to SIP Table 3-7** Baseline versus Natural Background (deciviews)

Baseline Natural Difference Baseline Natural Difference Badlands 6.89 2.86 4.03 17.14 8.06 9.08 Wind Cave 5.14 1.88 3.26 15.84 7.71 8.13 **Corrections to SIP Table 3-8** Annual Uniform Rate of Progress (URP) (deciviews) Class I Area Baseline 2018 URP goalReduction Needed2064 Natural Badlands 17.137 15.019 2.118 8.05906 Wind Cave 15.8412 13.944 1.897 7.711 Baseline-Natural % URP 14/60Reduction Needed URP 9.07794 0.233 2.118 0.1513 8.1302 0.233 1.897 0.1355 20% Most Impaired Days 20% Least Impaired Days Class I Area

Worst 20%

Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33536-33537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 420-009, Alaska]


City of Ketchikan and Ketchikan Public Utilities; Notice of 
Availability of Final Environmental Assessment

May 18, 2000.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for 
the Ketchikan Lakes Hydroelectric Project, and has prepared a Final 
Environmental

[[Page 33537]]

Assessment (FEA). The project is located on Ketchikan Creek and Granite 
Basin Creek, near the City of Ketchikan, in Ketchikan Gateway Borough, 
Alaska. The project uses lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service 
in the Tongass National Forest. The Forest Service is a cooperating 
agency on this environmental assessment. The FEA contains the staff's 
analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and 
concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental 
protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that 
would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Room, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20426. This FEA may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (please call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance). For further information, contact Charles Hall at (202) 
219-2853.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13010 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2008 PM2.5 Plan 

Chapter 5 

 

Public Accountability 
2008 PM2.5 Plan 

This page intentionally blank.
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District April 30, 2008

Chapter 5: Public Accountability 

2008 PM2.5 Plan 

5-1 

Chapter 5: Public Accountability

Although attainment of both the federal PM2.5 standard and the federal 8-hour ozone 

standard will require efforts from the state and federal governments, the District is 

committed to doing its share. To ensure District accountability, the District will complete 

annual reports to show progress in fulfilling its ozone and particulate matter (PM) plan 

commitments. These reports will be made publicly available and will be presented to 

the Governing Board each year, beginning in 2008. The reports will include: 

 A summary of progress made over the most recent calendar year in meeting the 

schedules for developing, adopting, and implementing the air pollution control 

measures in the District’s attainment plans1. 

 A table summarizing the proposed and actual dates for adoption and 

implementation of each measure. 

 Air quality data from the year, showing progress towards attaining the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

 A report of incentive funding, including the amount of funds awarded and the 

estimated reductions from grant-funded projects. Major elements of this part of 

the report would include the following: 

o Sources of funding 

o Expenditures 

o Types of projects funded 

o Actual versus predicted emissions reductions 

o Enforcement activities 

 Number and type of inspections conducted on grantees 

 Number of all grantees for whom there is evidence of noncompliance 

 List of enforcement actions taken by the District and the resultant 

penalties and remedies. 

o Description of the permanency of the funding sources and ideas for 

amending the program in the event of reduced funding. 

 The status of vehicle use control measures implemented by city and county 

governments2

. 

 A comparison of predicted versus current “best estimates” of emissions 

reductions for each measure and a short explanation of any shortfalls or surplus 

as well as a plan for rectifying shortfalls. 

 Status of State of California control measures (from ARB and DPR) 

These reports will be above and beyond any similar reports required by the federal 

Clean Air Act or the California Clean Air Act. 

 

1

 Required by California Health and Safety Code Section 40924 

2

 A state requirement, required by ARB’s 1993 Guidance for Annual and Triennial Progress Reports Under the 

California Clean Air Act
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District April 30, 2008

Chapter 5: Public Accountability 

2008 PM2.5 Plan 

5-2 

This page intentionally blank.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5610-5611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research Production 
Act of 1993--Open Axis Group, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 27, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Axis Group, Inc. 
(``Open Axis'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Tripit, Inc., San Francisco, CA; LUTE, Zug, SWITZERLAND; 
Traveldata Inc., Shibua-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN; Frontier Airlines, 
Indianapolis, IN; Navitaire, Minneapolis, MN; Travelguard Worldwide, 
Inc., Jersey City, NJ; SkyScanner LTD, Edinburgh, UNITED KINGDOM; 
Motocol LLC, Greenwood Village, CO; and Flightview, Allston, MA, have 
been added as parties to this venture. Also, Mobiata, Ann Arbor, MI, 
has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Open Axis intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 6, 2010, Open Axis filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section

[[Page 5611]]

6(b) of the Act on November 16, 2010 (75 FR 70031).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-2073 Filed 1-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009

Appendix F

Company Annual Report – Summary of

Reductions in Emissions and Product Content

Company Sanitized Public Copy
COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009

SECTION 1: REPORT DATE October 30, 2009

SECTION 2: COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Company Name

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

2a

Street Address

1007 Market Street, Wilmington DE USA 19808

SECTION 3: SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS Company Sanitized Public Copy

Reporting Period (use calendar year - e.g. Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2005) January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2008

Releases to all environmental media from

fluoropolymer and telomer manufacture

Operations Chemical category

kgs 1

kgs of fluoropolymers

kgs of category

kgs of telomers

kgs of category

% Reduction of

total kgs released

from baseline year

PFOA and PFOA salts 686 99%

Higher homologues

3a

U.S. facilities

Precursors [ CBI ] [ CBI ]

PFOA and PFOA salts 779 96%

3b Non-U.S. facilities Higher homologues

Precursors

Please provide information on the methods, assumptions, uncertainties and detection limits for the data provided above.

3c Methods, assumptions, etc. provided in business/site specific forms
COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 30, 2009

Product Content information is not summarized – see the individual Appendix D reports

SECTION 4: SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CONTENT

Reporting Period (use calendar year - e.g. Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2005) January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2008

Product type Fluoropolymer dispersions Other fluoropolymers1 Telomer based products

4a

Production volume (kgs/year) 2

Concentration3 % Reduction

from baseline year

Operations Chemical category Fluoropolymer

dispersions4

(ppm wetweight)

Other

fluoropolymers1,5

(ppb dry weight)

Telomer based

products6

(ppb dry weight )

Fluoropolymer

dispersions

Other

fluoropolymers1

Telomer

based

products

PFOA, PFOA salts and

higher homologues

4b

U.S. facilities

Precursors

PFOA, PFOA salts and

4c higher homologues Non-U.S.

facilities Precursors

Please provide information on the methods, assumptions, uncertainties and detection limits for the data provided above.

4d

1 Fluoropolymers manufactured with PFOA.

2 Use the following ranges: (1) Zero (2) > 0 – 10 kgs; (3) > 10 kgs – 100 kgs; (4) > 100 kgs – 1,000 kgs; (5) > 1,000 kgs – 10,000 kgs; (6) > 10,000 kgs –

100,000 kgs; (7) > 100,000 kgs – 1,000,000 kgs; (8) Over 1,000,000 kgs.

3

Concentration should reflect the concentration of chemical in the product as sold by the reporting company. If the reporting company has information

concerning the concentration of chemical in the product as used by others – for example, as incorporated by dilution into a formulation – that additional

information would also be helpful.

4 This value should be expressed as a weighted average concentration and range.

5 This value should be expressed as a maximum concentration.

6

This value should be expressed as a simple (not weighted) average and range.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 41 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 895
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 41

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2008

Mr. McConnell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. McCain, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
Allard, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burr, Ms. Cantwell, Mrs. Clinton, 
   Mr. Coleman, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Feingold, Mr. 
  Isakson, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. 
Smith, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Sununu, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Bingaman, 
Mr. Brown, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Domenici, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
   Voinovich, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Specter, Ms. Collins, Ms. 
Klobuchar, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

                             July 23, 2008

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
renewal of the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the 
Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

                                                       Calendar No. 895

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```