alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[EXHIBIT 21a TO COLONIAL GAS COMPANY
            FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996]

                       Colonial Gas Company
                    Subsidiaries of Registrant


Subsidiaries:			Organized in:		Ownership:

(a)  Transgas, Inc.		Massachusetts		100% (b)
(a)  CGI Transport Limited(c)	Canada			100%

(a)  Included in consolidated financial statements.
(b)  The Company has agreed to sell a 50% interest in Transgas Inc. to
     Cabot LNG Corporation as part of a joint venture.  Completion of the
     sale is subject to certain regulatory approvals. 
(c)  Owned by Transgas.


            [END OF EXHIBIT 21a TO COLONIAL GAS COMPANY
            FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
                  
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,695,170
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         18,597
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,146,602
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            76,991
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   7,272,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,209,679
<COMMON>                                           603,921
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,078,581
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                840,867
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   2,523,369
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              638,500
<PREFERRED>                                         63,664
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             4,471,675
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      251,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            1,050
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   4,260,421
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   12,209,679
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,150,695
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               210,197
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,203,917
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,414,114
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            736,581
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  27,512
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     764,093
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           447,629
<NET-INCOME>                                       316,464
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         52,216
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      264,248
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           213,753
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          384,198
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             892,313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.20
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. of our report dated May 14, 2004, included in the
2004 Annual Report to Shareholders of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Number 33-56630 on Form S-8 of the 1991 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, dated
December 31, 1992; Registration Statement Number 33-56624 on Form S-8 of the
1992 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, dated December 31, 1992;
Registration Statement Number 33-56626 on Form S-8 of the Marsh Supermarkets,
Inc. 401(k) Plan, dated December 31, 1992; Registration Statement Number
333-00917 on Form S-8 of the 1991 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,
dated February 14, 1996; Registration Statement Number 333-64321 on Form S-8 of
the Outside Directors Stock Plan, the Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan and the Executive Stock Purchase Plan, dated September 25, 1998;
Registration Statement Number 333-64343 on Form S-8 of the Marsh Deferred
Compensation Plan, dated September 25, 1998; Registration Statement Number
333-43256 on Form S-8 of the Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan, dated August
8, 2000; and Registration Statement Number 333-82908 on Form S-8 of the Marsh
Supermarkets, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, dated February 15, 2002; of our
report dated May 14, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Marsh
Supermarkets, Inc. for the year ended March 27, 2004.

                                                               Ernst & Young LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
June 21, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Company's Finacial
Statements as of December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000061004
<NAME>                        Lynch Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (361)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,674
<PP&E>                                          66,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (22,137)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,460
<BONDS>                                        116,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,192
<SALES>                                        194,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,222
<CGS>                                          172,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,544)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (8,065)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    110
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.12)



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7291

RODERICK DEMAIN GATLING

- BEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MELISSA KENNEDY, Durham Police Department; NATE PARKER, Durham Police Department; TIM JOHNSON, Durham Police Department; J. CARL HUSKETH, Durham Police Department; J.J. CARTWRIGHT, Durham Police Department; SET TEAM, Durham Police Department; JEFFREY LUX; JAMES DORNFRIED, Durham County ADA; JUDGE KENNETH C. TITUS; ERIK A. HO OKS; SUPERINTENDENT SAPPER, Bertie Correctional , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:18

- ct

- 03043

- D )

Submitted : February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Roderick Demain Gatling

- Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roderick Demain Gatling

- Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his § 1983 action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (b) (2012). W e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gatling

- Bey’s motion to enforce subrogation rights and a ffirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Gatling

- Bey v . Kennedy , No. 5:18

- ct

- 03043

- D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         14,565,307
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          3,531,274
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                        0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   118,819,812
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         28,377,077
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           27,592,632
<LOANS>                                       499,535,015
<ALLOWANCE>                                     3,377,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                719,816,312
<DEPOSITS>                                    483,469,104
<SHORT-TERM>                                   78,704,444
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             8,536,360
<LONG-TERM>                                    82,237,034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           48,277
<OTHER-SE>                                     66,821,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                719,816,312
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                27,318,136
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               8,044,091
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  123,568
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               35,485,795
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             15,079,871
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,890,583
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          13,595,212
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     399,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (50,535)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                12,469,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,590,001
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      3,628,001
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,628,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       2.83
<LOANS-NON>                                       370,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,118,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  436,302
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    61,946
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                3,134,664
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     222,667
<RECOVERIES>                                       66,463
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               3,377,460
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            3,377,460
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                 0


</TABLE>
#### § 97.2 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains general rules pertaining to this part and procedures for control of exceptions from this part.
USNO Circular 179 — Errata & Updates

George H. Kaplan

U.S. Naval Observatory

2006 September

1 Errata

Page 64, section 6.5.3, first paragraph, first sentence: “page 56” should be “page 57.”

Page 64, section 6.5.3, first paragraph, last sentence: “page 55” should be “pages 55–56.”

2 Updates

Page 83, the reference Hilton et al. (2006) is now

Hilton, J. L., Capitaine, N., Chapront, J., Ferrandiz, J. M., Fienga, A., Fukushima, T.,

Getino, J., Mathews, P., Simon, J.-L., Soffel, M., Vondrak, J., Wallace, P., & Williams,

J. 2006, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 94, 351 . . . 40, 43

Page 87, add

[18] Text of IAU resolutions of 2006: http://www.iau.org/Resolutions at GA-XXVI.340.0.html

General Addendum 1:

At the IAU XXVIth General Assembly, Prague, August 2006, three resolutions were adopted

that are relevant to the contents of the circular:

Resolution 1 recommends use of the precession theory P03 (Capitaine et al. 2003); that

the terms lunisolar precession and planetary precession be replaced by precession of the

equator and precession of the ecliptic, respectively; and that the ecliptic pole should be

defined by the mean orbital angular momentum vector of the Earth-Moon barycenter

in an inertial reference frame. Details are given in the report of the IAU Division I

1
Working Group on Precession and the Ecliptic (Hilton et al. 2006).

Resolution 2 adopts the names “Celestial Intermediate Origin” (CIO) and “Terrestrial

Intermediate Origin” (TIO) in place of “Celestial Ephemeris Origin” (CEO) and “Terrestrial Ephemeris Origin” (TEO), respectively; and recommends that the following

sentence be added to the definition of the BCRS: “For all practical applications, unless

otherwise stated, the BCRS is assumed to be oriented according to the ICRS axes. The

orientation of the GCRS is derived from the ICRS-oriented BCRS.”

Resolution 3 clarifies the definition of the time scale TDB to make it a specific linear

transformation of TCB. The resolution makes TDB for practical purposes the same as

Teph, the independent time argument of the JPL ephemeris DE405.

All three resolutions were anticipated when the circular was written and have already been incorporated into the information provided. The text of the resolutions is given at URL 18.

General Addendum 2:

With respect to section 2.5, the IAU Working Group on the Redefinition of Universal Time

Coordinated (UTC) completed its work and gave a final report at the IAU XXVIth General Assembly, Prague, August 2006. The report made no specific recommendation, and the IAU took no

action with respect to UTC or leap seconds. The IAU working group no longer exists.

2
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 122 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the construction and dedication 

of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2007 

Mr. HAGEL (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. WARNER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. INHOFE, Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DODD, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. REED, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. 

LEVIN, Mr. VITTER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BURR, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. SCHUMER, 

Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. BROWN, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SPECTER, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. OBAMA, 

Mr. CRAPO, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. 

SUNUNU, Mr. TESTER, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

BYRD, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BAUCUS, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. ENSIGN, 

Mr. CORKER, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. LOTT, Mr. CARDIN, 

Ms. SNOWE, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. ALEXANDER, and Mr. 

BUNNING) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the construction 

and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

Whereas 2007 marks the 25th anniversary of the construction and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in 

Washington, D.C.; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 122 ATS 

Whereas the memorial displays the names of more than 

58,000 men and women who lost their lives between 1956 

and 1975 in the Vietnam combat area or are still missing 

in action; 

Whereas every year millions of people in the United States 

visit the monument to pay their respects to those who 

served in the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans Memorial has been a source 

of comfort and healing for Vietnam veterans and the 

families of the men and women who died while serving 

their country; and 

Whereas the memorial has come to represent a legacy of healing and demonstrates the appreciation of the people of 

the United States for those who made the ultimate sacrifice: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses its support and gratitude for all 

3 of the men and women who served honorably in the 

4 Armed Forces of the United States in defense of 

5 freedom and democracy during the Vietnam War; 

6 (2) extends its sympathies to all people in the 

7 United States who suffered the loss of friends and 

8 family in Vietnam; 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to remember the sacrifices of our veterans; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 122 ATS 

1 (4) commemorates the 25th anniversary of the 

2 construction and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans 

3 Memorial. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 779.235 Other “enterprises.”

No attempt has been made in the discussion of the term “enterprise,” to consider every possible situation which may, within the meaning of section 3(r), constitute an “enterprise” under the Act. The discussion is designed to explain and illustrate the application of the term in some cases; in others, the discussion may serve as a guide in applying the criteria of the definition to the particular fact situation. A more complete discussion is contained in part 776 of this chapter.
### Ground-water geology of Kordofan Province, Sudan

By: Harry G. RodisAbdulla HassanLutfi Wahadan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1757J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 97.26 Non-Federal audit. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Grantees and subgrantees are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507) and revised OMB Circular A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.” The audits shall be made by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards covering financial audits.
( b ) *Subgrantees.* State or local governments, as those terms are defined for purposes of the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, that provide Federal awards to a subgrantee, expends $300,000 or more (or $500,000 or more for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2003 or such other amount as specified by OMB) in Federal awards in a fiscal year, shall: ( 1 ) Determine whether State or local subgrantees have met the audit requirements of the Act and whether subgrantees covered by OMB Circular A-110, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations,” have met the audit requirements of the Act. Commercial contractors (private for-profit and private and governmental organizations) providing goods and services to State and local governments are not required to have a single audit performed. State and local governments should use their own procedures to ensure that the contractor has complied with laws and regulations affecting the expenditure of Federal funds;
( 2 ) Determine whether the subgrantee spent Federal assistance funds provided in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. This may be accomplished by reviewing an audit of the subgrantee made in accordance with the Act, Circular A-110 (as codified at 2 CFR part 215), or through other means (e.g., program reviews) if the subgrantee has not had such an audit;
( 3 ) Ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken within six months after receipt of the audit report in instance of noncompliance with Federal laws and regulations;
( 4 ) Consider whether subgrantee audits necessitate adjustment of the grantee's own records; and
( 5 ) Require each subgrantee to permit independent auditors to have access to the records and financial statements.
( c ) *Auditor selection.* In arranging for audit services, § 97.36 shall be followed.
[53 FR 8069, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988, as amended at 62 FR 45939, 45942, Aug. 29, 1997; 72 FR 37105, July 9, 2007]