alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                 MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       (In millions, except ratio amounts)
                                   (unaudited)

                                                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                                                       --------------------------------------------
                                                          1997              1996             1995              1994           1993
                                                        ------            ------           ------            ------         ------
<S>                                                   <C>                 <C>               <C>              <C>            <C>
  Earnings:
    Income before
    income taxes and
    extraordinary item (a)                            $    239            $1,955           $  897            $1,280         $1,045

  Add:
    Fixed charges                                          568               460              344               315            315

  Less:
    Capitalized interest                                   153               118               93                78             61
                                                        ------            ------           ------            ------         ------
    Total earnings                                      $  654            $2,297           $1,148            $1,517         $1,299
                                                        ======            ======           ======            ======         ======

  Fixed Charges:
    Fixed charges on
    indebtedness,
    including amortization
    of debt discount and
    premium(a)                                          $  448            $  349           $  242            $  231         $  239
  Interest portion of
    operating lease
    rentals(b)                                             120               111              102                84             76
                                                        ------            ------           ------            ------         ------
     Total fixed charges                                $  568            $  460           $  344            $  315         $  315
                                                        ======            ======           ======            ======         ======
  Ratio of earnings to
    fixed charges                                         1.15              4.99             3.34              4.82           4.12
                                                        ======            ======           ======            ======         ======
</TABLE>

  (a)  Includes   distributions  on  subsidiary  Trust  mandatorily   redeemable
preferred securities.

  (b) The interest portion of operating lease rentals is calculated as one third
  of rent expense which  represents a reasonable  approximation  of the interest
  factor.
(77 South. 1002)

#### BIGGERS v. JONES.

(6 Div. 424.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 29, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; R. C. Briekell, Judge.

W. E. James, of Cullman, 'for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### § 548.404 Kinds of jobs or employees.

The application should describe or otherwise identify the employees to whom the established basic rate will apply. The individual employees need not be identified by name but may be described in terms of job classification, department, location or other appropriate identifying characteristics.

[20 FR 5683, Aug. 6, 1955]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 507 

Supporting the mission and goals of National Crime Victims’ Rights week 

in order to increase public awareness of the rights, needs, and concerns 

of victims and survivors of crime in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2008 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the mission and goals of National Crime Victims’ 

Rights week in order to increase public awareness of 

the rights, needs, and concerns of victims and survivors 

of crime in the United States. 

Whereas 23,000,000 Americans are victims of crime each 

year, and of those, 5,200,000 are victims of violent crime; 

Whereas a just society acknowledges crime’s impact on individuals, families, and communities by ensuring that 

rights, resources, and services are available to help rebuild lives; 

Whereas victims’ rights are a critical component of the promise of ‘‘justice for all’’, the foundation for our system of 

justice in the United States; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 507 IS 

Whereas, although our Nation has steadily expanded rights, 

protections, and services for victims of crime, too many 

victims are still not able to realize the hope and promise 

of these gains; 

Whereas we must do better to ensure that services are available for underserved segments of our population, including crime victims with disabilities, victims with mental illness, victims who are teenagers, victims who are elderly, 

victims in rural areas, and victims in communities of 

color; 

Whereas observing victims’ rights and treating victims with 

dignity and respect serves the public interest by engaging 

victims in the justice system, inspiring respect for public 

authorities, and promoting confidence in public safety; 

Whereas the United States recognizes that we make our 

homes, neighborhoods, and communities safer and 

stronger by serving victims of crime and ensuring justice 

for all; 

Whereas our Nation must strive to protect, expand, and observe crime victims’ rights so that there truly is justice 

for victims and justice for all; and 

Whereas National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, April 13 

through April 19, 2008, provides an opportunity for us 

to strive to reach the goal of justice for all by ensuring 

that all victims are afforded their legal rights and provided with assistance as they face the financial, physical, 

and psychological impact of crime: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the mission and goals of National 

3 Crime Victims’ Rights Week in order to increase 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 507 IS 

1 public awareness of the impact of crime on victims 

2 and survivors of crime, and of the rights and needs 

3 of such victims and survivors; and 

4 (2) requests the Secretary of the Senate to 

5 transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the 

6 Office for Victims of Crime in the Department of 

7 Justice. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Submitted on record and briefs December 16, 1992,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing February 3, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DOUGLAS JAY GORLEY, *Appellant.*

(91CR-0492; CA A73092)

844 P2d 945

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*104PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for manufacture of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He contends that in imposing sentence, the court improperly denied him credit for the time that he had served in jail before his sentencing. ORS 137:320. The state concedes error and we accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MERCURY
GENERAL CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,002,504
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     154,321
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,203,623
<CASH>                                           6,291
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          50,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,470,644
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                348,976
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            281,434
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,568
<OTHER-SE>                                     612,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,470,644
<PREMIUMS>                                     235,579
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             20,323
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 509
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,305
<BENEFITS>                                     158,024
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     50,502
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             8,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,052
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11405

Summary Calendar

MODESTUS E OKERE

Plaintiff–Appellant

v.

DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Defendant–Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

3:06-CV-00272

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For the reasons stated by the district court below, we AFFIRM.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the Quarterly Report of PFSB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
L. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                        By: /s/ Ronald L. Nelson
                                            -----------------------------
                                                Ronald L. Nelson
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                August 14, 2002
<PAGE>

Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lunn Industries, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
No.333-19759 on Form S-8 and No.333-12905 on Form S-3 of Lunn Industries, Inc.
of our report dated April 2, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Lunn Industries, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lunn Industries, Inc.

                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Jericho, New York
April 10, 1997
Mountain Line and Flagstaff Shelter Services 

Partnership

Transportation and Homeless Services Partnership in Arizona

Mountain Line is a transit agency in northern Arizona operating a fixed route bus service 

on nine routes, paratransit service, vanpool, and seasonal Mountain Express service to 

a major ski resort. In November 2021, Mountain Line and Flagstaff Shelter Services 

began a pilot program under a one-time Transportation for All (TP4A) grant. The grant 

funded a service that aimed to increase access to transportation for older adults, people 

with disabilities, and people at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Individuals at the 

shelter, as well as shelter staff helped inform the development of the project leading to a 

program that went from 12 rides in its first month to averaging 5-10 rides each day just 

one year later. 

Partnership Planning

• Planning took approximately 12 months.

• Mountain Line held monthly steering meetings with stakeholders, including 

Flagstaff Shelter Services. They also had periodic discussions with participants 

at the shelter who would later use the service.

• Needs assessments and participant interviews guided development.

• Mountain Line and Flagstaff Shelter Services previously worked together on a 

vehicle donation, which provided a foundation to grow the TP4A partnership.

• The program will be introducing fare boxes to their fleet to allow for cross-system 

access with regular bus transit services.
2

Lessons Learned

• Build upon previous positive interactions as a foundation for a closer partnership.

• Show respect and trust your partner.

• Show up! Be true to your word and honor the commitment.

• Be patient with the process. Getting input from people with lived experience 

takes time, but it is vital as it allows the program to be developed to truly meet 

their needs.

• Put the needs of the participants first and be person-centered in your design.

• Seek underserved areas of transit to increase access and advance equity by 

design.

Formal Agreements

The partnership operates under an agreement noted in a letter of commitment from 

Flagstaff Shelter Services as a requirement of the TP4A grant application process.

Funding Source Federal State/Local

Pilot – One-time TP4A grant through ACL X

Ongoing - Locally funded from sales tax percentage as 

part of paratransit X

Additional Vital Partners

Participant Advocates – Allow their input to inform the design and implementation of the 

program. They will likely recruit friends and family to get involved in the design and 

development process as well.

Contacts

Estella Hollander, TDM-CP, Mobility Planner, Mountain Line, 

ehollander@mountainline.az.gov

Holly Creager, Director of Programs, Flagstaff Shelter Services, Inc.,

holly@flagshelter.org
(77 South. 1002)

#### CHILDS v. STATE.

(4 Div. 530.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; A. B. Foster, Judge.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

Appeal dismissed on motion of Attorney General.
Copyright information

All material appearing in this report IS In the put)lic dornar and rmav

be reproduced or cop[ed wlthou~ permission, c!tatlon as 10 soutce

however, IS appreciated

Suggested citation

National Center for Health Stat! stlcs, L Flngerhu! 1989 Trends and

current status !n childhood mortal lty, United States, 1900–85 VJra/

and Hea/Fh .$tatls?ics Series 3, No. 26 DHHS Pub No IPHSI 89–

1410 Publlc Health Service Washington U S Government Prin!lng

Of f,ce

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data

Flngerhut, LoIs A

Trends and current status In childhood ro[jr{,jl,t~

Umted Slates, 1 900–85.

[Vital & health statistics Series 3 Anal}t[cal

and epldemlologlcal studies (no 26 I DHHS pub

no [PHS] 89–1410)

2

II

II

July 12, 1988

Bibliography p.

Supt of Dots no HE 20.6209326

1 Children-United State s—Morta llty —Statistics

Death—Causes—Statistics 1 Kle[nman Joel C

National Center for Health Statistics U S I

Title IV Series Vital and health statistics

Series 3, Analytical and epldem[ologlcal studies

no 26 V Series DHHS publication no IPHSI 89–1410

IDNLM 1 Adolescence. 2 Child 3 lnfdrl Morla’!,-

Unlted Slates 4 Mortal lty-Un!ted S!ates

W2 A N148vc no 26]

HB1323 C52U64 1988 3046’4’088054 88–600298

ISBN 0–8406–0428–9
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Dan W. GladneyDan W. GladneyChief Executive OfficerSeptember 13, 2005/s/ Scott P. YoungstromScott P. YoungstromChief Financial OfficerSeptember 13, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.3  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 26, 2007
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in 5- and 10-Cent Stores and Limited-Price Chain Department Stores

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth. 						*Women in 5- and 10-Cent Stores and Limited-Price Chain Department Stores : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 76*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1930,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5384,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 780.402 The general guides for applying the exemption. ( a ) Like other exemptions provided by the Act, the section 13(b)(12) exemption is narrowly construed (*Phillips, Inc.* v. *Walling,* 334 U.S. 490; *Bowie* v. *Gonzalez,* 117 F. 2d 11; *Calaf* v. *Gonzalez,* 127 F. 2d 934; *Fleming* v. *Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.,* 113 F. 2d 52; *Fleming* v. *Swift & Co.,* 41 F. Supp. 825; *Miller Hatcheries* v. *Boyer,* 131 F. 2d 283; *Walling* v. *Friend,* 156 F. 2d 429; see also § 780.2 of subpart A of this part 780). An employer who claims the exemption has the burden of showing that it applies. (See § 780.2) The section 13(b)(12) exemption for employment in agriculture is intended to cover all agriculture, including “extraordinary methods” of agriculture as well as the more conventional ones and large operators as well as small ones. Nevertheless, it was meant to apply only to agriculture. It does not extend to processes that are more akin to manufacturing than to agriculture. Practices performed off the farm by nonfarmers are not within the exemption, except for the irrigation activities specifically described in section 13(b)(12). Practices performed by a farmer do not come within the exemption for agriculture if they are neither a part of farming nor performed by him as an incident to or in conjunction with his own farming operations. These principles have been well established by the courts in such cases as *Mitchell* v. *Budd,* 350 U.S. 473; *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254; *Farmers Reservoir Co.* v. *McComb,* 337 U.S. 755; *Addison* v. *Holly Hill Fruit Products,* 322 U.S. 607; *Calaf* v. *Gonzalez,* 127 F. 2d 934; *Chapman* v. *Durkin,* 214 F. 2d 363, certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 897; *McComb* v. *Puerto Rico Tobacco Marketing Co-op. Ass'n.* 80 F. Supp. 953, 181 F. 2d 697.
( b ) When the Congress, in the 1961 amendments, provided special exemptions for some activities which had been held not to be included in the exemption for agriculture (see subparts F and J of this part 780), it was made very clear that no implication of disagreement with “the principles and tests governing the application of the present agriculture exemption as enunciated by the courts” was intended (Statement of the Managers on the part of the House, Conference Report, H. Rept. No. 327, 87th Cong. first sess., p. 18). Accordingly, an employee is considered an exempt agricultural or irrigation employee if, but only if, his work falls clearly within the specific language of section 3(f) or section 13(b)(12).