alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
^be\ AcosVa XVeAC Coulee <£ P>9?e&\S v^O. o^-^^^pm^ RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS DEC 07-2015 0^ o^^/Pfcvfftvrre^ vk^v^oyA DEC 112015 Abel Acosta, Gierk 

### v* -75*50* c^cervA^on P^^^e \o*.-tW>.TOe<^ Vo^Vxu&ec^ M-W ^^ act) Ce.\\(jo^• Pe^V.oner c\oe^ <\>v Vvwe a<e 09AV* WoUW-o^ad-^S V\or.or<3b\e CourV CAcac\V awc oA • ^

-Tv\«av \l n ^ °^ ^ u<2ave V> Proceed onOne ^A^c;U€n^hxy 9^ ?a&^^ ^ ^ 

### ^ WW 6'^oecX ^ecev^sov C ?co-Se^ WeV)^ ce<v^es ^V^<a VuearJ 

## c*cce& Co^^ ^ aVxxle ^ ^^-^cWvY)e^ ^5 ^.^^e^;A^
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com>

Date: 7/22/2010 11:20 AM

Subject: Re: ICR Extension Request

Attachments: pic16653.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Ebensburg Power Company (EPC) plant.

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed

questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic16653.gif)

 

 From: "Richard Ramsdell" <RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Gary Anderson" <ganderson@TRAINING.rtp.epa.gov> 

 Date: 07/08/2010 02:36 PM 

 Subject: ICR Extension Request 

Plant ID: 05183

Ms. Alicea,

Ebensburg Power Company (EPC) recently received an Information

Collection Request (ICR) that will be used to develop effluent

limitation guidelines and standards for the Steam Electric Power

Generating Industry. EPC has started the process of compiling the

information requested, but due to extensive amount of information

requested, it will take some time to complete all the forms.

EPC respectfully requests a 90 day extension for the submittal; of the

data.

If you should have any questions or comments please contact me via the

contact information below.
Thank you

Richard A. Ramsdell

Plant Engineer

Ebensburg Power Company

PO Box 845

Ebensburg, PA 15931

Tel: (814) 472-1140 Ext. 305

Fax: (814) 472-1143

Email: RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com
#### § 95.40 Purpose of procurement standards.

Sections 95.41 through 95.48 set forth standards for use by recipients in establishing procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, real property and other services with Federal funds. These standards are furnished to ensure that such materials and services are obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. No additional procurement standards or requirements shall be imposed by DOL upon recipients, unless specifically required by Federal statute or executive order or approved by OMB.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132465 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan AHMED HARAJLI and FATMA HARAJLI, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132465 COA: 262651 Wayne CC: 01-130236-CK KHALIL HARAJLI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
```

[115th Congress Public Law 179]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1380]]

Public Law 115-179
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To allow the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 
Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, 
 the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the Confederated 
 Tribes of Warm Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, 
  the Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribes to lease or transfer 
           certain lands. <<NOTE: June 1, 2018 -  [S. 1285]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Oregon Tribal 
Economic Development Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oregon Tribal Economic Development 
Act''.
SEC. 2. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, without 
further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United States, 
the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, the 
Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, the 
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes 
of Warm Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, the 
Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribes may lease, sell, convey, 
warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interests in any 
real property that is not held in trust by the United States for the 
benefit of such tribe.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section shall--
            (1) authorize the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, 
        and Siuslaw Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde 
        Community of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians 
        of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, the Cow 
        Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, the Klamath Tribes, and 
        the Burns Paiute Tribes to lease, sell, convey, warrant, or 
        otherwise transfer all or any part of an interest in any real 
        property that is held in trust by the United States for the 
        benefit of such tribe; or

[[Page 132 STAT. 1381]]

            (2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in such trust land.

    Approved June 1, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1285 (H.R. 3225):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: Nos. 115-507 and 115-564, accompanying H.R. 3225, (both 
from Comm. on Natural Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 115-175 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    Nov. 29, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    May 15, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part prescribes the general and special drawbridge operating regulations that apply to the drawbridges across the navigable waters of the United States and its territories. The authority to regulate drawbridges across the navigable waters of the United States is vested in the Secretary of Homeland Security.
( b ) Subpart A contains the general operation requirements that apply to all drawbridges.
( c ) Subpart B contains specific requirements for operation of individual drawbridges. These requirements are in addition to or vary from the general requirements in Subpart A. Specific sections in subpart B that vary from a general requirement in Subpart A supersede the general requirement. All other general requirements in Subpart A, that are not at variance, apply to the drawbridges and removable span bridges listed in Subpart B.
[USCG-2001-10881, 71 FR 70307, Dec. 4, 2006]
#### § 779.102 Scope of this subpart.

The Act has applied since 1938 and continues to apply to all employees, not specifically exempted, who are engaged: (a) In interstate or foreign commerce or (b) in the production of goods for such commerce, which is defined to include any closely related process or occupation directly essential to such production. (See §§ 779.12-779.16 for definitions governing the scope of this coverage.) Prior to the 1961 amendments a retailer was not generally concerned with the coverage provisions as they applied to his individual employees because retail or service establishments ordinarily were exempt. However, in some cases such coverage was applicable as where employees were employed in central offices of warehouses of retail chain store systems and, therefore, were not exempt. (See § 779.118.) Some exemptions for retail or service establishments were narrowed as a result of the 1961 amendments and further revised or eliminated by the 1966 amendments effective February 1, 1967. Therefore, discussion of the individual coverage provisions of the Act is pertinent and this subpart will discuss briefly the principles of such coverage with particular reference to employment in the retail or service trades. A more comprehensive discussion with respect to employees engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce may be found in part 776 of this chapter, the general coverage bulletin.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | • | the                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended                June                30, 2007, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | • | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                DENNIS L. SHOGREN                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Dennis                L. Shogren                     |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
§ 110.125 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. ( a ) *Area A-1.* Opposite the City of Morro Bay, beginning 50 feet west of the intersection of the west channel line and the prolongation of the center line of Seventh Street; thence in a generally southeasterly direction and parallel to the channel line for a distance of 450 yards; thence 166° and parallel to the revetment for a distance of 1,025 yards; thence 270° for a distance of 200 yards; thence 346° for a distance of about 1,425 yards to meet the prolongation of the center line of Seventh Street; and thence to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area A-2.* Beginning at a point 322° and 150 feet from the high water line on the most westerly part of Fairbanks Point; thence continuing on this bearing for a distance of 1,346 feet; thence 52° for a distance of 450 feet and thence generally southeasterly parallel to and 150 feet from the mean high water line to the point of beginning.
Note:
Moorings and boating activities will be allowed in these areas conforming to applicable City of Morro Bay ordinances and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.
#### § 778.421 Offset hour for hour.

Where overtime rates are paid pursuant to statute or contract for hours in excess of 8 in a day, or in excess of the applicable maximum hours standard, or in excess of the employees' normal working hours or regular working hours (as under section 7(e)(5) or for work on “special days” (as under section 7(e)(6), or pursuant to an applicable employment agreement for work outside of the hours established in good faith by the agreement as the basic, normal, or regular workday (not exceeding 8 hours) or workweek (not exceeding the applicable maximum hours standard) (under section 7(e) (7), the requirements of section 7(g) (1) and 7(g)(2) will be met if the number of such hours during which overtime rates were paid equals or exceeds the number of hours worked in excess of the applicable maximum hours standard for the particular workweek. It is not necessary to determine whether the total amount of compensation paid for such hours equals or exceeds the amount of compensation which would be due at the applicable rates for work performed during the hours after the applicable maximum in any workweek.
#### AKS Jewelry Manufacturing Corp., Appellant, v Regosin, Edwards, Stone & Feder et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 28, 1996;

decided July 9, 1996

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, motion for leave to appeal denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. *[See,*88 NY2d 874.]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

[Exemption Application No. D-10654]


Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Exemption Involving Fish Lake 
Beach, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan); Located in Round Lake, 
Illinois

    In the Federal Register dated February 29, 2000 (65 FR 10826), the 
Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed 
exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and from certain taxes imposed 
by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption 
concerned the prospective cash sale of a certain parcel of real 
property by the Plan to the trust of Emilie Keil, a party in interest 
with respect to the Plan.
    On April 7, 2000, the applicant informed the Department that it 
wished to withdraw the notice of proposed exemption.
    Accordingly, the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of May, 2000.
Ivan L. Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 00-13642 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 272 

Praising Muslim-American physicians who condemned recent attempted 

terrorist acts in the United Kingdom. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. HAGEL) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Praising Muslim-American physicians who condemned recent 

attempted terrorist acts in the United Kingdom. 

Whereas in early July 2007, acts of terrorism were attempted 

at Glasgow Airport and in London; 

Whereas early indications suggest that Muslim physicians allegedly were responsible for the attempted acts of terrorism; 

Whereas thousands of Muslim-American physicians living and 

practicing in the United States are an important and welcome component of American society; 

Whereas Muslim-American physicians, through the Islamic 

Medical Association of North America, publicly stated 

that the association ‘‘condemns in the strongest terms 

the attack on Glasgow Airport, the attempted attack in 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 272 ATS 

London; and all attacks by which innocent people are 

killed or harmed in any manner and all attacks that result in destruction of the property of innocent people’’; 

and 

Whereas the Islamic Medical Association of North America 

further stated, ‘‘Such attacks, regardless of whether or 

not they have been perpetrated by physicians, are against 

the most basic teachings of our religion, Islam, and are 

contrary to the very basic principles of our profession, regardless of religion or creed. Suicide is also strictly prohibited in Islam.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) condemns the recent attempted attacks in 

3 the United Kingdom; 

4 (2) commends the Islamic Medical Association 

5 of North America for swift, clear, and public denun6 ciation of the attacks; 

7 (3) encourages Muslim voices in the United 

8 States and abroad to continue speaking out against 

9 terrorism; and 

10 (4) condemns bigotry and acts of violence 

11 against any American, including Arab-Americans 

12 and Muslim-Americans. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 465 

Designating March 3, 2008, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. REED (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 3, 2008, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress, through the No Child Left Behind Act of 

2001 (Public Law 107–110) and the Reading First, 

Early Reading First, and Improving Literacy Through 

School Libraries programs, has placed great emphasis on 

reading intervention and providing additional resources 

for reading assistance; and 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the Namstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 465 ATS 

tional Education Association to use March 3 to celebrate 

reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known as 

Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 3, 2008, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

5 Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to dis6 cover the joy of reading; 

7 (3) honors the 11th anniversary of Read Across 

8 America Day; 

9 (4) encourages parents to read with their chil10 dren for at least 30 minutes on Read Across Amer11 ica Day in honor of the commitment of the Senate 

12 to building a Nation of readers; and 

13 (5) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

15 activities. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1332, -1333, -1334 WILLIAM R. KOWALSKI,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MOMMY GINA TUNA RESOURCES, KING TUNA, INC., JOAQUIN T. LU (also known as Jake Lu), MOMMY GINA TUNA RESOURCES, INC., INTEGRAL SEAFOOD LLC,

GJ FRESH LLC, RICHARD FRIEND, SEAFRIEND, and CITRA MINA SEAFOOD CORPORATION (also known as Citra Mina Seafood Market), Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in consolidated case nos. 05-CV-00679, 05-CV-00787, and 06-CV-00182,

Magistrate Judge Barry M. Kurren.

ON MOTION 

### ORDER Upon consideration of Mommy Gina Tuna Resources, et al.'s unopposed motion for an extension of time, until August 17, 2009, to file their brief, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

## JUN 24 2009 Date Jan Horbaly

cc: Carl Crowell, Esq. Milton M. Yasunaga, Esq.

m2 Clerk nuer• us. COURT OF Ap FEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JUN 2 4 2009 JAN HORtsiti CLERK
§ 825.803 Special rules for airline flight crew employees, recordkeeping requirements. ( a ) Employers of eligible airline flight crew employees shall make, keep, and preserve records in accordance with the requirements of Subpart E of this Part (§ 825.500).
( b ) Covered employers of airline flight crew employees are required to maintain certain additional records “on file with the Secretary.” To comply with this requirement, those employers shall maintain: ( 1 ) Records and documents containing information specifying the applicable monthly guarantee with respect to each category of employee to whom such guarantee applies, including copies of any relevant collective bargaining agreements or employer policy documents; and
( 2 ) Records of hours worked and hours paid, as those terms are defined in § 825.801(b)(2).
1

Motion GRANTED and Order filed February 15, 2017. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00104-CV

____________

IN RE AMY MCPEAK, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

300th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 88736-F

ORDER

On February 8, 2017, relator Amy McPeak, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus asking this court to order the Honorable Kenneth Randall Hufstetler, 

Judge of the 300th District Court, in Brazoria County, Texas, to set aside his “Order 

on Respondent’s Opposed Request to Modify and/or for Additional Temporary 

Orders” dated January 19, 2017, entered in trial court number 88736-F.
2

Relator has also filed a motion asking this court to stay proceedings in the trial 

court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P.

52.8(b), 52.10.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and 

issue the following order:

We ORDER the provision in the Agreed Temporary Orders signed on 

November 22, 2016, which requires relocation of the children and that the children 

be turned over to the father’s possession, STAYED until a final decision by this 

court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.

Additionally, the court requests James McPeak, the real party-in-interest, to 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before February 28, 2017. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

Additionally, we ORDER relator to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.9 by redacting the names of the children from the reporter’s record 

(appendix, Exhibit J) and refiling her petition for writ of mandamus and appendix.

See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Busby, and Jewell.