alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (12)

              THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                       (All dollar amounts in millions)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                  Year Ended December 31
                                       ----------------------------------------------
                                        1996       1995     1994      1993      1992
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>       <C> 
Earnings:
The Mead Corporation earnings
 from continuing operations
 before income taxes                   $294.6     $487.7   $ 52.4    $135.0    $ 15.8
Mead's share of earnings of
 investees before income taxes            8.2       63.4     95.7      30.3       9.4
Interest and debt expense                73.3       86.0    113.4     107.5     116.0
Amortization of capitalized interest:
 The Mead Corporation                     4.8        4.5      4.6       6.5       4.9
 Mead's share of investees                 .7         .7      1.3       1.4       1.5
Portion of rental payments deemed
 to be interest                          18.6       16.9     18.0      16.5      17.3
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------
                                       $400.2     $659.2   $285.4    $297.2    $164.9
                                       ======     ======   ======    ======    ======
Combined fixed charges:
Interest and debt expense:
 The Mead Corporation                  $ 57.7     $ 69.4   $101.1    $ 94.6    $ 99.5
 Mead's share of investees               15.6       16.6     12.3      12.9      16.5
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------
                                         73.3       86.0    113.4     107.5     116.0
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------

Capitalized interest-
  The Mead Corporation                    6.9        2.0      5.7       2.6       2.3
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------

Portion of rental payments deemed
 to be interest:
  The Mead Corporation                   18.2       16.4     17.6      16.2      17.3
  Mead's share of investees                .4         .5       .4        .3
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------
                                         18.6       16.9     18.0      16.5      17.3
                                       ------     ------   ------    ------    ------
                                       $ 98.8     $104.9   $137.1    $126.6    $135.6
                                       ======     ======   ======    ======    ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        4.1        6.3      2.1       2.3       1.2
                                       ======     ======   ======    ======    ======
</TABLE> 
                                      67
EXHIBIT32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Faces East EntertainmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Smolanoff, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/MichaelSmolanoff                       
MichaelSmolanoff

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

November 22, 2004
§ 901.3 Participation by Commission. ( a ) The Commission will consider participation in specific disputes which conform with the following criteria: ( 1 ) The disputes will have a significant impact on construction activity in the area involved.
( 2 ) The dispute concerns negotiations for a new or expiring agreement, or a question of interpretation or application of an existing agreement, where all other internal methods of resolution have been exhausted.
( b ) The Commission will normally refrain from participating in specific disputes where; ( 1 ) The dispute involved concerns jurisdiction of work.
( 2 ) The parties have failed to utilize an independent disputes handling procedure presently in existence or subsequently established. (A number of such procedures exists currently in several branches of the industry.)
( 3 ) The parties have not fully utilized the service of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
( c ) In setting forth a disputes procedure the Commission emphasizes that it is not intended to provide a substitute for the collective bargaining process. Nor is it a means to bypass or neglect existing mediation facilities or industry branch dispute settling procedures. The standard procedure for the Commission to accept cognizance over a collective bargaining dispute is through referral to the Commission by the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. The Commission will exercise its judgment in accepting or declining specific disputes. The staff of the Commission is directed to maintain close contact with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service on all aspects of bargaining in the construction industry and to see that critical disputes are brought to the attention of the appropriate International Union and the national offices of an appropriate contractor association.
Pennsylvania

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

SECRETARY

July 8, 2015

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Re: Attainment Date Extension Request forthe Philadelphia andPittsburgh-Beaver Valley

8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas

Dear Mr. Garvin:

Pursuant to Section 181(a)(5) of the Federal Clean AirAct(CAA), 1amrequesting, onbehalf of

theCommonwealth of Pennsylvania, that theU.S. Environmental Protection (EPA) extend by

one year the July 20,2015, attainment date for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air

Quality Standard (NAAQS) in thePhiladelphia and Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Areas. This

attainment date extension request pertains to the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City

(PA-DE-NJ-MD) Ozone Nonattainment Area andthePittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PAOzone

Nonattainment Area (whichis comprised of Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler,Fayette,

Washington andWestmoreland Counties). EPAclassified these areas as "marginal" ozone

nonattainment areas, effective July 20, 2012.

As prescribed in Section 182(a) ofthe CAA, "marginal" ozone nonattainment areas should attain

the 2008 ozone NAAQS by July 20, 2015. Nonetheless, Section 181(a)(5) of the CAA

authorizes EPAto grant up to two one-year extensions of the attainment date. To this end, 1am

certifying the following for a one-year attainment date extension to July 20,2016, for eachof the

Philadelphia and Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Areas:

1) The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has complied with all requirements and

commitments pertaining to these areas in the applicable ozone implementation plans.

2) The Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City (PA-DE-NJ-MD) Ozone Nonattainment

Area's 4th highest daily 8-hour monitored value during the 2014 ozone season is

0.075 ppm or less.

3) The Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Ozone Nonattainment Area's 4th highest daily 8-hour

ozone value during the 2014 ozone season is 0.075 ppm or less.

Rachel Carson State Office Building | P.O. Box 2063 | Harrlsburg, PA 17105-2063

717.787.2814 www.depweb.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper O ^ ^
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin -2- July 8, 2015

Enclosed are letterssubmitted to EPAcertifying that Pennsylvania's ozone air qualitydata in the

EPA AirQuality System for thePhiladelphia and Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Areas is complete,

quality-assured ambient air quality monitoring dataforthe 2014 ozone season.

Thank you inadvance for your expedited consideration ofthe requested one-year extensions of

the 8-hour ozone NAAQS attainment date forthe Philadelphia andPittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Areas. Should youhave questions or need additional information, please contact Joyce E. Epps,

Director, Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail atjeepps@.pa.gov or by telephone at 717.787.9702.

Sincerely,

Dhn Quigley

Secretary

Enclosures
John Quigley - 3 - June 26, 2015

bee: Kirit Dalai

Randy Bordner

Kristen Furlan

Alex Haas

File
###### Editorial Note on Part 101

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

#### § 101.545 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENT
OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  356,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,839
<INVENTORY>                                    302,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               713,517
<PP&E>                                       1,119,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                 571,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,458,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          441,455
<BONDS>                                        278,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       138,003
<OTHER-SE>                                     430,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,458,801
<SALES>                                      2,149,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,149,474
<CGS>                                        1,619,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,619,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (3,283)
<NET-INCOME>                                    97,054
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.44
        

                                      

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CAROL ANN CARTER, MONICA 

PARRILLA, REBECCA POYOUROW, 

WILLIAM TUNG, ROSEANNE MILAZZO, 

BURT SIEGEL, SUSAN CASSANELLI, LEE 

CASSANELLI, LYNN WACHMAN, MICHAEL 

GUTTMAN, MAYA FONKEU, BRADY HILL, 

MARY ELLEN BALCHUNIS, TOM DEWALL, 

STEPHANIE MCNULTY AND JANET 

TEMIN,

Petitioners

v.

LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY 

OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN 

HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR 

FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF 

ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 7 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of February, 2022, given the impasse between the 

legislative and executive branches concerning the adoption of congressional districts, and 

in view of the impact that protracted appeals will have on the election calendar, and time 

being of the essence, Petitioners’ Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief is 

GRANTED, and Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S. § 726 is EXERCISED.
[7 MM 2022] - 2

Consistent with the process established in Mellow v. Mitchell, 607 A.2d 204 

(Pa. 1992), it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The consolidated actions docketed in the Commonwealth Court at 

Nos. 464 M.D. 2021 and 465 M.D. 2021 shall remain consolidated for all purposes in this 

Court.

2. The Honorable Patricia A. McCullough, a jurist on the Commonwealth Court of 

Pennsylvania who currently is presiding over the consolidated actions below, is 

designated to serve as a Special Master.

3. The proceedings occurring in the Commonwealth Court prior to the issuance of 

this Order, and the filings submitted to that court at its direction in furtherance of those 

proceedings, shall be considered part of the Special Master’s record.

4. The Special Master shall file with this Court on or before February 7, 2022, a 

report containing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting her 

recommendation of a redistricting plan from those submitted to the Special Master, along 

with a proposed revision to the 2022 election schedule/calendar.

5. On or before February 14, 2022, any Party or Amicus Participant previously

designated by the court below may file with this Court exceptions to the Special Master’s 

report along with a brief in support thereof. This Court will hold oral argument on these 

exceptions in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on February 18, 2022, beginning at 9:30 a.m.

The stay issued by this Court on January 31, 2022, is hereby LIFTED. The 

Gressman Petitioners’ Request for Clarification is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Chief Justice Baer and Justice Dougherty file concurring statements.

Justice Mundy files a dissenting statement in which Justice Brobson joins.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50171-50172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Virginia State 
Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

[[Page 50172]]


ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS 
State Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Virginia that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide 
specifically in the following practice standards: <greek-i>328, 
Conservation Crop Rotation, <greek-i>329, Residue and Tillage 
Management No Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed, <greek-i>344, Residue 
Management, Seasonal, <greek-i>345, Residue and Tillage Management 
Mulch Till, <greek-i>346, Residue Management, Ridge Till, <greek-i>391, 
Riparian Forest Buffer, <greek-i>422, Hedgerow Planting, <greek-i>472, 
Access Control, <greek-i>595, Integrated Pest Management, <greek-i>612, 
Tree/Shrub Establishment, and <greek-i>666, Forest Stand Improvement. 
These practices will be used to plan and install conservation 
practices.

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
this date of publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Bricker, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606 
Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229-5014; Telephone 
number (804) 287-1691; Fax number (804) 287-1737. Copies of the 
practice standards will be made available upon written request to the 
address shown above or on the Virginia NRCS Web site: http://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/draftstandards.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Virginia will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made to the subject standards.

    Dated: July 21, 2011.
W. Ray Dorsett,
Acting State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2011-20586 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
The HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, United States District

*

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by 

designation.

 The Honorable Jerry Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge 1

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

 

No. 95-4241

 

Reginald Smith, *

*

 Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

 v. * District Court for the Eastern

 * District of Arkansas.

Roger Endell, Director, Arkansas *

Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

 Appellee. *

 

Submitted: June 14, 1996

 Filed: June 26, 1996 

 

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and JACKSON,*

District Judge.

 

PER CURIAM.

In this habeas case brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a), petitioner

asserted six grounds in an effort to invalidate his state court conviction

for first-degree murder. The magistrate judge concluded that five of

1

those claims were defaulted and that the defaults were not excused and that

the sixth claim was not reviewable under the rule of Stone v. Powell, 428

U.S. 465 (1976). 
 The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge 2

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

The district court adopted the findings and recommendations of the

2

magistrate judge and dismissed the petition.

We have read the record carefully and discern no legal error or

clearly erroneous factual finding. We affirm the judgment of the district

court on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of the magistrate judge.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nancy D. Parmelee, as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February 28, 2011











/s/ Nancy D. Parmelee


Nancy D. Parmelee


Senior Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of MCI Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1996
and the income statement for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                     0000064079
<NAME>                                    MCI Communications Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000,000
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                           187
<SECURITIES>                                                     161
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  3,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     273
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               4,716
<PP&E>                                                        18,709
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 6,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                22,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          5,046
<BONDS>                                                        4,798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            750
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                          74
<OTHER-SE>                                                    10,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  22,978
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              18,494
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 16,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                1,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     753
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            1,202
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   1,202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   1.73
        


</TABLE>
(79 South. 398)

#### LITTLE v. STATE.

(6 Div. 484.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 11, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; J. C. B. Gwin, Judge.

Defendant Carroll Little was convicted for carrying a concealed pistol, and from' the judgment he appeals.

Affirmed.

Pinkney Scott, of Bessemer, for appellant. E. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMEORD, J.

The judgment is affirmed, upon authority of Carroll Little v. State, ante, p. 492, 79 South. 397, present term, by Brown, P. J.

Affirmed.