alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
G02 S. ain Street 

,Joplin. l\IO G4801 

417 -G2:3-02G2 

,'·· Fax417-625-171/l REGIONAL AIRPORT E-mail: :o;stoekam(a<joplimno.org 

November 5, 2012 

Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, 81

h Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference DOT -OST -2006-23932 

Dear Dennis, 

The City of Joplin, Missouri is pleased to provide in this letter its comments on the pending Essential Air 

Service RFP regarding our local air service. 

The last two years have been exceptional for Joplin air service. American Eagle replaced Great Lakes as our 

local airline in February of 2011. In 2010, the last full year of Great Lakes service, we generated about 7,800 

O&D passengers. In the first full 12 months of American Eagle service (March 2011 to February 2012) we 

generated over 53,000 O&D passengers, an increase of about 600%! 

We are very pleased with American Eagle service and are working with that carrier to improve that service. We 

are gratified that Eagle is proposing for this bid cycle a dramatic reduction in subsidy need from $2,778,756 per 

year to only $342,559 per year. 

Based on those numbers Joplin is well on its way to attaining its goal of supporting subsidy free air service. We 

appreciate the efforts the Department has made to support us as the air service landscape around us changed 

during the past decade. We wholeheartedly endorse the proposal of American Airlines to provide American 

Eagle service at Joplin for the next two year EAS cycle. 

We accept American's proviso that 50-seat regional jet equipment types may vary and that either American 

Eagle or SkyWest (operating as American Eagle) may operate Joplin's AA coded flights. We do hope the 

carrier will ensure we receive as many 50-seat flights as possible in order to accommodate our growing traffic 

demand. We do note that the carrier's bid document specifies the 50-seat ERJ-145. 

As was the case for the first two year EAS cycle with American, Joplin waives the right to hold-in American 

Eagle (after 120 day notice of termination) should the carrier wish to exit the market. We are confident that will 

not occur and look forward to a continued long and successful relationship with American. 

Best regards, 

Steve Stockam 

Airport Manager 

-
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 256 

Designating June 2007 as ‘‘National Aphasia Awareness Month’’ and 

supporting efforts to increase awareness of aphasia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2007 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 2007 as ‘‘National Aphasia Awareness 

Month’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness 

of aphasia. 

Whereas aphasia is a communication impairment caused by 

brain damage, typically resulting from a stroke; 

Whereas, while aphasia is most often the result of stroke or 

brain injury, it can also occur with other neurological disorders, such as in the case of a brain tumor; 

Whereas many people with aphasia also have weakness or paralysis in their right leg and right arm, usually due to 

damage to the left hemisphere of the brain, which controls language and movement on the right side of the 

body; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 256 ATS 

Whereas the effects of aphasia may include a loss or reduction in ability to speak, comprehend, read, and write, 

while intelligence remains intact; 

Whereas stroke is the 3rd leading cause of death in the 

United States, ranking behind heart disease and cancer; 

Whereas stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability in the United States; 

Whereas there are about 5,000,000 stroke survivors in the 

United States; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are about 750,000 strokes 

per year in the United States, with approximately 1⁄3 of 

these resulting in aphasia; 

Whereas aphasia affects at least 1,000,000 people in the 

United States; 

Whereas more than 200,000 Americans acquire the disorder 

each year; 

Whereas the National Aphasia Association is unique and provides communication strategies, support, and education 

for people with aphasia and their caregivers throughout 

the United States; 

Whereas as an advocacy organization for people with aphasia 

and their caregivers, the National Aphasia Association 

envisions a world that recognizes this ‘‘silent’’ disability 

and provides opportunity and fulfillment for those affected by aphasia; and 

Whereas National Aphasia Awareness Month is commemorated in June 2007: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 256 ATS 

1 (1) supports the goals and ideals of, and en2 courages all Americans to observe, National Aphasia 

3 Awareness Month in June 2007; 

4 (2) recognizes that strokes, a primary cause of 

5 aphasia, are the third largest cause of death and dis6 ability in the United States; 

7 (3) acknowledges that aphasia deserves more 

8 attention and study in order to find new solutions 

9 for serving individuals experiencing aphasia and 

10 their caregivers; and 

11 (4) must make the voices of those with aphasia 

12 heard because they are often unable to communicate 

13 their condition to others. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### § 783.6 Definitions of terms used in the Act.

The meaning and application of the provisions of law discussed in this part depend in large degree on the definitions of terms used in these provisions. The Act itself defines some of these terms. Others have been defined and construed in decisions of the courts. In the following sections some of these basic definitions are set forth for ready reference in connection with the part's discussion of the various provisions in which they appear. These definitions and their application are further considered in other statements of interpretations to which reference is made, and in the sections of this part where the particular provisions containing the defined terms are discussed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of Patron  Systems,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

     1.   the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: May 22, 2006                    /S/ MARTIN T. JOHNSON
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Martin T. Johnson
                                      Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


            Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Ascent Media Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

            The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31,
2002 and December 31, 2001 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001.

Dated: March 27, 2003                        /s/ William R. Fitzgerald
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             William R. Fitzgerald
                                             Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 27, 2003                        /s/ George C. Platisa
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             George C. Platisa
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer

            The foregoing certification accompanies the Form 10-K solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and, pursuant
to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-47551, the foregoing
certification shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the Form 10-K but shall
be deemed to accompany such report.

            A signed original of this written statement required by section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350

(Section 906of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection withthe filing by Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”),each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Barry M. Portnoy |                                   | /s/ David J. Hegarty |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Barry M. Portnoy     | David J. Hegarty                       |
| Managing Trustee     | President and Chief  Operating Officer |
|                 |                                   |
|                 |                                   |
| /s/ Adam D. Portnoy  |                                   | /s/ Richard A. Doyle |
| Adam D. Portnoy      | Richard A. Doyle                       |
| Managing Trustee     | Treasurer and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Date:       November 10, 2008

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer



I, Garry Wong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  | /s/ Garry Wong         
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  | Garry Wong             
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
**NOX Notes** 

YES, NOx Only YES, non-NOx Model Available NO, but NOx Model Available NO, No NOx Model Available
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 24, 2011 

t0516 

Order 

 

May 24, 2011 

142613 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142613 

 COA: 269505 

Saginaw CC: 02-021097-FH 

TOD KEVIN HOUTHOOFD a/k/a TODD 04-024765-FH 

KEVIN HOUTHOOFD, 05-025865-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2021

No. 04-21-00105-CV

Troy STEVENS d/b/a Real Estate Workshop, Cory Wadsworth, and MJ Augie Bove,

Appellants

v.

Cory SMITH,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV09409

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

LACK OF JURISDICTION. Appellants’ motion for extension of time to file their brief is 

DISMISSED AS MOOT.

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee Cory Smith recover his costs on appeal from Appellants 

Troy Stevens d/b/a Real Estate Workshop, Cory Wadsworth, and MJ Augie Bove.

It is so ORDERED on September 22, 2021.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of September, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.2

Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer



I, Garry Wong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |                        
|                   |  | /s/ Garry Wong         
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | Garry Wong             
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 104.120 Compliance documentation. ( a ) Each vessel owner or operator subject to this part must ensure that copies of the following documents are carried on board the vessel and are made available to the Coast Guard upon request: ( 1 ) The approved Vessel Security Plan (VSP) and any approved revisions or amendments thereto, and a letter of approval from the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC);
( 2 ) The VSP submitted for approval and a current acknowledgement letter from the Commanding Officer, MSC, stating that the Coast Guard is currently reviewing the VSP submitted for approval, and that the vessel may continue to operate so long as the vessel remains in compliance with the submitted plan;
( 3 ) For vessels operating under a Coast Guard-approved Alternative Security Program as provided in § 104.140, a copy of the Alternative Security Program the vessel is using, including a vessel specific security assessment report generated under the Alternative Security Program, as specified in § 101.120(b)(3) of this subchapter, and a letter signed by the vessel owner or operator, stating which Alternative Security Program the vessel is using and certifying that the vessel is in full compliance with that program; or
( 4 ) For foreign vessels, subject to the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, (SOLAS), Chapter XI-1 or Chapter XI-2, a valid International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) that attests to the vessel's compliance with SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code, part A (Incorporated by reference, see § 101.115 of this subchapter) and is issued in accordance with the ISPS Code, part A, section 19. As stated in Section 9.4 of the ISPS Code, part A requires that, in order for the ISSC to be issued, the provisions of part B of the ISPS Code need to be taken into account.
( b ) Each owner or operator of an unmanned vessel subject to this part must maintain the documentation described in paragraphs (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this section. The letter required by each of those paragraphs must be carried on board the vessel. The plan or program required by each of those paragraphs must not be carried on board the vessel, but must be maintained in a secure location. During scheduled inspections, the plan or program must be made available to the Coast Guard upon request.
( c ) Each vessel owner or operator who designates a passenger or employee access area (as those terms are defined in §§ 104.106 and 104.107 of this part) on their vessel must keep on board the vessel with their approved VSP a clear, visual representation (such as a vessel schematic) of where those designated areas fall. This need not be submitted to the Coast Guard for approval until incorporated into the VSP at the next VSP submittal (either renewal or amendment), but must be made available to the Coast Guard upon request.
[USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39302, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60513, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2004-18057, 69 FR 34925, June 23, 2004; USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 3579, Jan. 25, 2007; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57710, Aug. 23, 2016]
### RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908

- 5767 TDD 401

- 831

- 5508

28 August 2015
Mr. David B. Conroy USEPA, Region 1 5 Post Office Square — Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Dear Mr. Conroy: The Office of Air Resources is hereby submitting the enclosed, revised Air Pollution Control Regulation 8, entitled "Sulfur Content of Fuels" as a revision to the Rhode Island State Implementation Plan (SIP). In this revised regulation, all provisions of the regulation related to Section 8.7 "Fuel Supply Shortages" have been stricken and will not be part of the requested SIP revision. The version of Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 8 previously submitted on 26 June 2014 should be withdrawn. If you should have any questions, feel free to contact me at 401-222-2808, ext 7011. Sincerely,

Douglas McVay, ef Office of Air Resources Enclosure cc: Anne Arnold, EPA Region 1 w/o enclosures

‘ 1 4: 30% post-consumer fiber
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04331A026