alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 778.320 Hours that would not be hours worked if not paid for. In some cases an agreement or established practice provides for compensation for hours spent in certain types of activities which would not be regarded as working time under the Act if no compensation were provided. Preliminary and postliminary activities and time spent in eating meals between working hours fall in this category. Compensation for such hours does not convert them into hours worked unless it appears from all the pertinent facts that the parties have treated such time as hours worked. Except for certain activity governed by the Portal-to-Portal Act (see paragraph (b) of this section), the agreement or established practice of the parties will be respected, if reasonable. ( a ) *Time treated as hours worked.* Where the parties have reasonably agreed to include as hours worked time devoted to activities of the type described in the introductory text of this section, payments for such hours will not have the mathematical effect of increasing or decreasing the regular rate of an employee if the hours are compensated at the same rate as other working hours. The requirements of section 7(a) of the Act will be considered to be met where overtime compensation at one and one-half times such rate is paid for the hours so compensated in the workweek which are in excess of the statutory maximum.
( b ) *Time not treated as hours worked.* Under the principles set forth in § 778.319, where the payments are made for time spent in an activity which, if compensable under contract, custom, or practice, is required to be counted as hours worked under the Act by virtue of section 4 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (see parts 785 and 790 of this chapter), no agreement by the parties to exclude such compensable time from hours worked would be valid. On the other hand, in the case of time spent in an activity which would not be hours worked under the Act if not compensated and would not become hours worked under the Portal-to-Portal Act even if made compensable by contract, custom, or practice, such time will not be counted as hours worked unless agreement or established practice indicates that the parties have treated the time as hours worked. Such time includes bona fide meal periods, see § 785.19. Unless it appears from all the pertinent facts that the parties have treated such activities as hours worked, payments for such time will be regarded as qualifying for exclusion from the regular rate under the provisions of section 7(e)(2), as explained in §§ 778.216 through 778.224. The payments for such hours cannot, of course, qualify as overtime premiums creditable toward overtime compensation under section 7(h) of the Act.
[84 FR 68776, Dec. 16, 2019]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 258 

Recognizing the historical and educational significance of the Atlantic Freedom Tour of the Freedom Schooner Amistad, and expressing the sense 

of the Senate that preserving the legacy of the Amistad story is important in promoting multicultural dialogue, education, and cooperation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2007 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historical and educational significance of 

the Atlantic Freedom Tour of the Freedom Schooner 

Amistad, and expressing the sense of the Senate that 

preserving the legacy of the Amistad story is important 

in promoting multicultural dialogue, education, and cooperation. 

Whereas the Slave Trade Act of the British Parliament in 

1807 was the first major legislation to abolish the slave 

trade and began the march to end slavery; 

Whereas, in 1839, 53 Africans were illegally kidnapped from 

Sierra Leone and sold into the transatlantic slave trade; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 258 IS 

Whereas the captives were brought to Havana, Cuba, aboard 

the Portuguese vessel Tecora, where they were fraudulently classified as native-born Cuban slaves; 

Whereas the captives were sold to Jose ́ Ruiz and Pedro 

Montez of Spain, who transferred them onto the coastal 

cargo schooner La Amistad; 

Whereas, on the evening of the rebellion, La Amistad was secretly directed to return west up the coast of North 

America, where after two months the Africans were 

seized and arrested in New London, Connecticut; 

Whereas the captives were jailed and awaited trial in New 

Haven, Connecticut; 

Whereas the trial of the captives became historic when former 

President John Quincy Adams argued on behalf of the 

enslaved before the United States Supreme Court and 

won their freedom; 

Whereas, in 2007, the Freedom Schooner Amistad will embark on its first transatlantic voyage to celebrate the 

200th anniversary of the abolition of the transatlantic 

slave trade; and 

Whereas the Amistad case represents an opportunity to call 

to public attention the evils of slavery and the struggle 

for freedom and the restoration of human dignity: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate recognizes the historical and 

3 educational significance of the Atlantic Freedom 

4 Tour of the Freedom Schooner Amistad; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 258 IS 

1 (2) the Senate encourages the people of the 

2 United States to learn about the history of the 

3 United States and better understand the experiences 

4 that have shaped this Nation; and 

5 (3) it is the sense of the Senate that preserving 

6 the legacy of the Amistad should be regarded as a 

7 means in fostering multicultural dialogue, education, 

8 and cooperation. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James R. Swartwout, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summa Industries;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in thisAnnual Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | /s/ James R. Swartwout   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | James R.  Swartwout      |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | November 8,  2005   |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5
 
                                                 February 2, 1999
 
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services L.L.C.
450 West 33rd Street
15th Floor
New York, New York 10001
Attn: Vice President -- Stock Transfer Administration
 
Dear Sir/Madam:
 
     This letter will serve as your certification, pursuant to Sections 12 and
26 of the Rights Agreement, dated as of November 10, 1994 (the "Rights
Agreement"), between the undersigned and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services,
L.L.C., as successor to Chemical Bank, as follows:
 
          (i) Pursuant to Section 11(a)(i) of the Rights Agreement, effective
     December 14, 1998, the record date of the undersigned's recent two-for-one
     stock split (the "Stock Split"), the Purchase Price set forth in Section
     7(b) of the Rights Agreement became $35.00. Since a new Right was issued in
     connection with each share of Common Stock issued in the Stock Split, no
     adjustment is required to be made to the number of Rights or the shares of
     Common Stock for which such Rights are exercisable.
 
          (ii) To fulfill the Company's requirement to notify Rights holders of
     the adjustment under Sections 12 and 26 of the Rights Agreement, a
     description of this adjustment will be included in the undersigned's Form
     10-K for 1998 which will be sent to all holders of Common Stock in early
     1999.
 
          (iii) To the extent that the foregoing is deemed to supplement or
     amend the Rights Agreement under Section 27, this letter shall effect and
     reflect such supplement or amendment and I hereby certified that such
     supplement or amendment is in compliance with Section 27 of the Rights
     Agreement.
 
                                          Very truly yours,
 
                                          LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
                                          By:     /s/ JAMES W. LANGHAM
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: James W. Langham
                                            Title: Vice President, General
                                                   Counsel and Secretary
 
AGREED TO:
 
CHASEMELLON SHAREHOLDER SERVICES, L.L.C.
 
By:     /s/ FRANK R. MISCIAGNA
    ----------------------------------
    Name: Frank R. Misciagna
    Title: Assistant Vice President
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CCBT Financial
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 , as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ PHILLIP W. WONG, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Phillip W. Wong, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 13, 2003
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in the Candy Industry in Chicago and St. Louis: A Study of Hours, Wages and Working Conditions in 1920-1921

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in the Candy Industry in Chicago and St. Louis: A Study of Hours, Wages and Working Conditions in 1920-1921 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 25*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1923,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5349,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 503.49 Consent findings and order. ( a ) *General.* At any time after the commencement of a proceeding under this part, but before the reception of evidence in any such proceeding, a party may move to defer the receipt of any evidence for a reasonable time to permit negotiation of an agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of the whole or any part of the proceeding. The allowance of such deferment and the duration thereof will be at the discretion of the ALJ, after consideration of the nature of the proceeding, the requirements of the public interest, the representations of the parties, and the probability of an agreement being reached which will result in a just disposition of the issues involved.
( b ) *Content.* Any agreement containing consent findings and an order disposing of a proceeding or any part thereof will also provide: ( 1 ) That the order will have the same force and effect as an order made after full hearing;
( 2 ) That the entire record on which any order may be based will consist solely of the notice of administrative determination (or amended notice, if one is filed), and the agreement;
( 3 ) A waiver of any further procedural steps before the ALJ; and
( 4 ) A waiver of any right to challenge or contest the validity of the findings and order entered into in accordance with the agreement.
( c ) *Submission.* On or before the expiration of the time granted for negotiations, the parties or their attorney or agent may: ( 1 ) Submit the proposed agreement for consideration by the ALJ; or
( 2 ) Inform the ALJ that agreement cannot be reached.
( d ) *Disposition.* In the event an agreement containing consent findings and an order is submitted within the time allowed therefore, the ALJ, within 30 days thereafter, will, if satisfied with its form and substance, accept such agreement by issuing a decision based upon the agreed findings.
#### § 786.200 Enforcement policy concerning performance of nonexempt work.

The Division has taken the position that the exemption provided by section 13(b)(17) of the Fair Labor Standards Act will be deemed applicable even though some nonexempt work (that is, work of a nature other than that which characterizes the exemption) is performed by the employee during the workweek, unless the amount of such nonexempt work is substantial. For enforcement purposes, the amount of nonexempt work will be considered substantial if it occupies more than 20 percent of the time worked by the employee during the workweek.

[32 FR 15426, Nov. 4, 1967]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills: A Study of Cause and Extent

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Lost Time and Labor Turnover in Cotton Mills: A Study of Cause and Extent : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 52*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1926,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5367,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Amy Frank, Respondent, against Economy Sales Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Argued April 21, 1937;

decided May 25, 1937.

*516
      *Paul Koch*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          12,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                       848
<INVENTORY>                                     88,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,378
<PP&E>                                         355,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,124
<BONDS>                                        145,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,395<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,631
<SALES>                                      1,451,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,451,730
<CGS>                                        1,096,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,415,220<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)<F3>
<FN>
<F1>NUMBER OF CLASS A AND CLASS B SHARES OUTSTANDING
<F2>INCLUDES (i)  $1,096,586 OF COST OF GOODS SOLD (ITEM 5-03(b)2(a) OF
                  REGULATION S-X) AND
             (ii) $318,634 OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
                  (ITEM 5-03(b)4 OF REGULATION S-X).
<F3>MULTIPLIER IS 1 FOR PER SHARE DATA.  ADJUSTED TO EXCLUDE THE EFFECTS OF
    ANTIDILUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS AND CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                                   April 16, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to us that its audit of the
consolidated balance sheets of McMoRan Exploration Co. as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders'
equity for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2001 was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity
of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of
national office consultation.  Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to their audit.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   McMoRan Exploration Co.


                                   By:/s/ Richard C. Adkerson
                                      -------------------------
                                         Richard C. Adkerson
                                         Co-Chairman of the Board,
                                         President, and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
#### § 780.101 Matters discussed in this subpart.

Section 3(f) defines “agriculture” as this term is used in the Act. Those principles and rules which govern the interpretation of the meaning and application of the Act's definition of “agriculture” in section 3(f) and of the terms used in it are set forth in this subpart B. Included is a discussion of the application of the definition in section 3(f) to the employees of farmers' cooperative associations. In addition, the official interpretations of section 3(f) of the Act and the terms which appear in it are to be taken into consideration in determining the meaning intended by the use of like terms in particular related exemptions which are provided by the Act.