alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.10-5 Public availability of records and documents. ( a ) Each person desiring to inspect a record or document covered by this subpart that is located in Headquarters, or to obtain a copy of such a record or document, must make a written request to the Commandant (CG-61), Attn: Office of Information Management, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7710, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7710.
( b ) Each person desiring to inspect a record or document covered by this subpart that is located in a Coast Guard district, or to obtain a copy of such a record or document, must make a written request to the district commander in command of the district, or to the officer-in-charge of the appropriate marine inspection zone. Coast Guard districts and marine inspection zones are listed in part 3 of this chapter.
( c ) If the person making the request does not know where in the Coast Guard the record or document is located, he may send his request to the Chief, Office of Information Management (CG-61), at the address in paragraph (a) of this section.
[CGD-73-54R, 38 FR 12396, May 11, 1973, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33662, June 28, 1996; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38427, July 7, 2014]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 33-54879, 33-48490,
33-48673, 33-52797, 33-52799, 333-61351, 333-28621, 333-45212 and 333-56534) and
the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Registration Statement Nos. 333-93023 and 333-74665) of Kmart Corporation of
our report dated May 15, 2002, except as to the effect of the matters described
in Note 1, which is as of January 14, 2003, relating to the financial statements
and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
January 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      95,051
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                            95,051
<CASH>                                     7,026
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           143,544
<POLICY-LOSSES>                           80,934
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                       15,847
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      37
<OTHER-SE>                                36,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             143,544
<PREMIUMS>                                 3,629
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        1,594
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             0
<OTHER-INCOME>                               102
<BENEFITS>                                 2,989
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                 393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          878
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 878
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.25
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00198-CR

EDWIN ANTONIO OSORIO-LOPEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th District Court

Upshur County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17927

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion on Remand by Justice van Cleef
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND

Following a retrospective competency trial, the trial court determined that Edwin Antonio 

Osorio-Lopez was competent at his trial of conviction.1 On appeal before this Court, we 

determined that the right to self-representation did not apply at the retrospective competency trial 

and that, as a result, the trial court erred in permitting Osorio-Lopez’s attorney to withdraw 

without appointing new counsel to represent him at the retrospective competency trial. OsorioLopez v. State, 629 S.W.3d 487, 493 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2021), rev’d, 2022 WL 2335394 

(Tex. Crim. App. June 29, 2022). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that this Court 

erred in reaching the self-representation issue because the trial court did not deny OsorioLopez’s request to represent himself. Osorio-Lopez v. State, 2022 WL 2335394, at *1. 

Having so concluded, and having rejected Osorio-Lopez’s statutory arguments, the Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals remanded to this Court to determine “whether Appellant was 

competent to waive counsel, and if so, whether he did so voluntarily, knowingly, and 

intelligently.” The court continued, “Part of the latter inquiry requires examining the selfrepresentation warnings. If they are insufficient, we have suggested that error might be subject 

to a harm analysis.” Id. at *5 (citing Williams v. State, 252 S.W.3d 353, 358 n.38 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2008)). 

1Osorio-Lopez was convicted of evading arrest or detention with a vehicle and aggravated assault with a deadly 

weapon and was sentenced to concurrent ten-year and twenty-year sentences, respectively. See TEX. PENAL CODE 

ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A), § 22.02 (Supp.) In companion cause number 06-18-00197-CR, Osorio-Lopez appeals the 

trial court’s retrospective competency determination in connection with his conviction of evading arrest or detention 

with a vehicle. 
3

We addressed these issues in our opinion in Osorio-Lopez’s companion appeal, cause 

number 06-18-00197-CR, styled Edwin Antonio Osorio-Lopez v. The State of Texas. For the 

reasons expressed in that opinion, we find that, in this case, Osorio-Lopez is, likewise, entitled to 

a new retrospective competency trial.

We reverse the trial court’s competency determination and remand for a new 

retrospective competency trial. The trial court is instructed to appoint counsel—who will not be 

a potential witness at that trial—to represent Osorio-Lopez at the retrospective competency trial. 

Charles van Cleef

Justice

Date Submitted: March 28, 2023

Date Decided: April 28, 2023

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John H. Goodwin, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the ninemonths ended June 30, 2003 of Starberrys Corporation, the registrant;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 45 days prior to the filing date ofthis quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified forthe registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and

 

6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
|                    | */s/  JOHN H. GOODWIN*                  |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  August 28, 2003 |                                         |   |
|                    | **John H. Goodwin  Chief Executive Officer** |

 

1

----
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 484 

Designating March 25, 2008, as ‘‘National Cerebral Palsy Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2008 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 25, 2008, as ‘‘National Cerebral Palsy 

Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas cerebral palsy is any number of neurological disorders that appear in infancy or early childhood and permanently affect body movement and the muscle coordination necessary to maintain balance and posture; 

Whereas cerebral palsy is caused by damage to 1 or more 

specific areas of the brain, usually occurring during fetal 

development, before, during, or shortly after birth, or 

during infancy; 

Whereas the majority of children are born with cerebral 

palsy, although it may not be detected until months or 

years later; 

Whereas 75 percent of individuals with cerebral palsy also 

have 1 or more additional developmental disabilities inVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:58 Mar 14, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR484.IS SR484

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 484 IS 

cluding epilepsy, intellectual disability, autism and visual 

impairments, or blindness; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released information indicating an increase in the 

prevalence of cerebral palsy and that the rate is now 

about 1 in 278 children; 

Whereas 800,000 Americans are affected by cerebral palsy; 

Whereas, while there is no current cure for cerebral palsy, 

some treatment will often improve a child’s capabilities 

and scientists and researchers are hopeful that breakthroughs will be forthcoming; 

Whereas researchers across the Nation are conducting important research projects involving cerebral palsy; and 

Whereas the Senate is an institution that can raise awareness 

in the general public and the medical community of cerebral palsy: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 25, 2008, as ‘‘National 

3 Cerebral Palsy Awareness Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that all people of the United 

5 States should become more informed and aware of 

6 cerebral palsy; and 

7 (3) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

8 Senate to transmit a copy of this resolution to 

9 Reaching for the Stars: A Foundation of Hope for 

10 Children with Cerebral Palsy. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### § 94.515 Are there any exceptions to those actions?

The Secretary of Labor or designee may waive with respect to a particular award, in writing, a suspension of payments under an award, suspension or termination of an award, or suspension or debarment of a recipient if the Secretary of Labor or designee determines that such a waiver would be in the public interest. This exception authority cannot be delegated to any other official.
1977

Report on Survey of U.S.

Shipbuilding and Repair Facilities

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Maritime Administration
Sales Contract


EXHIBIT 4.14




Sales Contract on Pelletizing Iron Concentrate 




The Seller: Wuhu Feishang Mining Development Co., Ltd.

Contract No.: FSK14-06

The Buyer: Anhui Tiancheng Renewable Resources Ltd.

Signed at: Fanchang, Wuhu




Based on friendly consultations, the seller and the buyer reached to the following agreement on the sales of iron concentrates:

1.

The seller provided the appropriate monthly quantity of products to the buyer and the price was based on monthly negotiation, i.e. marketing price. 

2.

The place of delivery was in the pounds room of Yangchong yard. The sold quantity was settled based on the weighing list of the seller, and the buyer could send its representative to supervise the weighing.

3.

The seller together with the buyer took the samples from the yard of the seller. The sample was triplicate, one for each party and another for arbitration. The test results would be subjected to the seller. If there was any discrepancy, the buyer could put forward to arbitration. The arbitration was Maanshan Mining Research Institute. 

4.

Payment was in advance and then delivery. The price was based on 65% of Total Fe (“TFe”). If TFe65% rose 1%, the price was plus CNY30/T, while declining 1%, the price reduced CNY30/T.

5.

The seller should ensure that TFe was equal 65%, sulfur (“S”) was less than or equal 1.0%, silica (“SiO2”) was less than or equal 3.5%, phosphorus (“P”) was less than or equal 0.1%, and -200 mesh was more than or equal 68%. If S≤1.0% rose 0.01, the price reduced CNY0.1/T. If -200 mesh ≥68% declined 1%, the price reduced CNY5/T

6.

The seller provided 17% value-added-tax invoice to the buyer and the settlement was on a month basis.

7.

The outstanding issues not set out in the contract was settled based on both parties’ negotiation. 

8.

The terms of the contract was from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.




The Buyer

Names of The Buyer: Anhui Tiancheng Renewable Resources Ltd.

Legal Representative:

A/C with Bank: 

A/C no: 

Tax ID no.:

Zip Code: 

Tel: 

Address: Wei 3rd Road North, Circular Economy Demonstration Garden, Hefei

/s/ Yang Houdao




The Seller

Names of The Seller: Wuhu Feishang Mining Development Co., Ltd.

Legal Representative: Xu Chengyin

A/C with Bank: ICBC Fanchang Branch

A/C no:

Tax ID no:

Zip Code: 241202

Tel: (0553) 7337509

Address: Xiaokeshan, Xingang , Fanchang ,Wuhu 

/s/ Bai Zeen




Signature Date: January 1, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 12, 2004



/s/ David M. BuckleyDavid M. BuckleyPresident / Chief Executive Officer
#### § 794.133 “Bulk” distribution.

“Bulk” distribution of petroleum products typically connotes those methods of distribution in which large quantities of the product are distributed in a single delivery or delivery trip. Thus, “bulk” distribution includes deliveries from bulk storage facilities at the establishment to the tank truck of a customer (whether or not at “wholesale”). It also includes deliveries made in series on a single trip on a delivery route to the storage tanks or facilities of a number of customers from a bulk supply of the product transported by tank truck, motor transport, or other motor carrier operated by the enterprise. Such deliveries are to be contrasted with such typical small-quantity individual deliveries as those made into the tank of a motor vehicle for use in its propulsion.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-85 Collection of civil penalties. ( a ) Payment of a civil penalty may be made by check or postal money order payable to the U.S. Coast Guard.
( b ) Within 30 days after receipt of the Commandant's decision on appeal, or the Hearing Officer's decision in a case in which no appeal has been filed, the party must submit payment of any assessed penalty to the office specified in the assessment notice. Failure to make timely payment will result in the institution of appropriate action under the Federal Claims Collection Act and the regulations issued thereunder.
( c ) When a penalty of not more than $200 has been assessed under Chapter 43 or 123 of Title 46 U.S.C., the matter may be referred for collection of the penalty directly to the Federal Magistrate of the jurisdiction wherein the person liable may be found, for the institution of collection procedures under supervision of the district court, if the court has issued an order delegating such authority under section 636(b) of Title 28, United States Code.
[CGD 87-008a, 52 FR 17555, May 11, 1987]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35100-35101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant

[[Page 35101]]

applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee F--Manpower & Training.
    Date: June 14-16, 2000.
    Time: 6:30 pm to 8 am.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Mary Bell, Phd, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8058, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-7978.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: May 23, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13727 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA-2015 - 3986 Directorate Identifier: 2015NM057AD

84 - 32 - 112, RB --- 9/12/2014 and (Goodrich) 46400 - 32 - 102, R1 --- 6/24/2013 84 - 32 - 112, RA --- 4/16/2014 84 - 32 - 112 --- 12/20/2012 84 - 32 - 114, RA --- 9/18/2013 84 - 32 - 114 --- 6/06/2013 84 - 54 -20, RB --- 10/02/2014 84 - 54 -20, RA --- 4/09/2014 84 - 54 -20 --- 4/25/2013

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008