alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

 

I, Yanlin Han, certify that:  

 
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc.; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.            The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 
|   | b) | Omitted |
|--------|----|---------|

 

c)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.             The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 10, 2005
|   | ___/s/ Yanlin Han__________ |
|--------|-----------------------------|

Yanlin Han, 

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 
|  |
|--|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.35

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
 To amend Public Law 108-331 to provide for the construction and related 
activities in support of the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope 
               Array System (VERITAS) project in Arizona.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOCATION OF VERITAS PROJECT.

    Public Law 108-331 (118 Stat. 1281) is amended--
        (1) in the long title, by striking ``on Kitt Peak near Tucson, 
    Arizona'' and inserting ``in Arizona''; and
        (2) in section 1, by striking ``on Kitt Peak near Tucson, 
    Arizona'' and inserting ``at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory 
    Base Camp on Mount Hopkins, Arizona, or other similar location''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Cybex International, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-34309, 333-118475 and 333-114028) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-79899, 333-29045, 33-59947, 333-97379, 333-97377 and333-125434) on Form S-8 of Cybex International, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cybex International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the related financial statement schedule, which reportappears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Cybex International, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

March 31, 2011
July 30 , 2015

Mr

. K han Funk

15261 Cartagena Court

Corpus Christi, TX 78418

Dear Mr

. Funk :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regu lations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 13 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1647 ), but

we are unable to p rocess your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effectiv e date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brit tany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Commonwealth *vs*Jefferson, &c.

Error to the' Trigg -Circuit.-

Indictment.

*Case*64.

Prior to 1841 this Court had no jurisdiction to revise the decisions of the Circuit Court in prosecutions for misdemeano rs, unless in cases where fine is the only punishment.

*Misdemeanors. Appeals and writs of error.*

*April 7.*

Judge Bkeok

delivered the opinion of the Court

It was held in *Duncan vs The Commonwealth,*(6 *Dana,*295,) that this Court had no ievisory jurisdiction over a prosecution for an affray, upon the ground- that a part of the punishment for the offence was *imprisonment.*The punishment, at that .time, both at common law and by statute, was fine and imprisonment. Since that time the Legislature has-placed it in the discretion'of the-jury to award either fine or imprisonment, or both, as the punishment for an affray;'(3 *Stat. Laws,*520.) That act, however, does not'make the offence exclusively penal, and punishable only by,a pecuniary fine. Whether the punishment in this ease, had it gone to the jury and the defendant had been found guilty, would have been fine or imprisonment, or both, cannot be determined. As the offence, therefore, cannot be regarded as punishable by a pecuniary fine only, we think this Court has no jurisdiction in this case.

*314By the statute of 1841, an appeal ot writ of error is allowed to defendants but not to the Commonwealth.

*Cates, Attorney General,*for Commonwealth.

The act.of 1841 gives the defendant in a prosecution for an affray, a right to appeal or prosecute a writ of error, but the right is not extended to the Commonwealth.

The writ of error in this case, therefore, for want of appellate jurisdiction, is dismissed.
#### § 801.75 Certification of official record.

Upon receipt of timely notice of appeal to a United States District Court of a Decision and Order issued under this part, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall promptly certify and file with the appropriate United States District Court, a full, true, and correct copy of the entire record, including the transcript of proceedings.
#### Angelos P. Romas, Appellant, v George Arena et al., Respondents. (And a Similar Action.)

Submitted May 28, 1996;

decided July 9, 1996

Motion for reargument dismissed as untimely *(see,*22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). *[See,*87 NY2d 810.]
[FRP LETTERHEAD]


                                August 26, 1997


IMC Global, Inc.
2100 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60092

                      RE: Agreement for Sulphur Supply dated July 1, 1993
                          among Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners,
                          Limited Partnership, IMC Fertilizer Inc. and IMC-
                          Agrico Company (the "Sulphur Supply Agreement")

Gentlemen:

     In connection with the transactions contemplated in the Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated August 26, 1997 between IMC Global Inc. and
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the "Merger Agreement"), FRP will transfer its
interest in the Sulphur Supply Agreement to the company referred to in the
Merger Agreement as "Newco". (Terms not otherwise defined in this letter will
have the meaning ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement.) A question has
arisen in connection with Article III of the Sulphur Supply Agreement
relating to its term. In consideration of the benefits anticipated by them in
connection with the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, FRP
and IGL wish to record their understanding as follows.

     IGL and FRP acknowledge that, while not contemplated at this time, a
transaction or series of transactions could take place in the future as a
result of which IMC-Agrico Company's (the "Partnership's") phosphate
fertilizer operations could be acquired by transfer tor by operation of law by
IGL or a company controlling, controlled by or under common control with IGL
(an "Affiliate"), with or without the consequent termination of the
Partnership (an "IGL Acquisition Transaction"). IGL and FRP acknowledge and
agree that the "business of the Partnership" and the term of the Sulphur
Supply Agreement, as intended by Article III of the Agreement, will not be
deemed to end as a result of an IGL Acquisition Transaction.

<PAGE>

IMC Global, Inc.
August 26, 1997
Page 2

     This agreement is not intended to amend Article III or any other term of
the Sulphur Supply Agreement and is intended to be for the benefit of and
binding on FRP, Newco, IGL and its Affiliates, and the successors and assigns
of any of them.

                                    Yours truly,

                                    Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners,
                                    Limited Partnership

                                    By:  Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
                                         Managing General Partner

                                    By:  /s/ Robert M. Wohleber
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Robert M. Wohleber
                                         Senior Vice President


APPROVED AND AGREED:

By: /s/ Lynn F. White
    ---------------------
    Lynn F. White
    Vice President
§ 780.322 Is employed on the same farm as his parent or persons standing in the place of his parent. ( a ) The words “employed on the same farm” are accorded their natural meaning with the usual caution, however, that as in the case of all other exemptions, the exemptive language is to be construed narrowly. (See § 780.2.)
( b ) Individuals who are considered as “his parent or persons standing in place of his parent” include natural parents, or any other person where the relationship between that person and a child is such that the person may be said to stand in place of a parent. For example, one who takes a child into his home and treats it as a member of his own family, educating and supporting the child as if it were his own, is generally said to stand to the child in place of a parent.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

GALILEO HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC.; ) CHAD WIDENER; and ELIZABETH ) WIDENER, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3242 ) NEW ENGLAND ANTIQUITIES OF ) SARASOTA, INC., ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 22, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Frederick P. Mercurio, Judge. Joseph M. Herbert of Gurley & Associates, Sarasota, for Appellants. Steele T. Williams of Steele T. Williams, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
§ 810.2 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The USMCA replaces the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement. The USMCA Preamble states that the parties to the agreement are resolved to, among other things, “facilitate trade in goods and services between the Parties by preventing, identifying, and eliminating unnecessary technical barriers to trade, enhancing transparency, and promoting good regulatory practices,” and that the Parties are resolved to “promote the protection and enforcement of labor rights, the improvement of working conditions, the strengthening of cooperation and the Parties' capacity on labor issues.”
( b ) The purpose of the USMCA Implementation Act is to implement the USMCA. Section 202A of the Act, codified at 19 U.S.C. 4532, in part implements Article 7 of the Automotive Appendix. This Article establishes a labor value content requirement for passenger vehicles, light trucks, and heavy trucks, pursuant to which an importer can obtain preferential tariff treatment for a covered vehicle only if it meets certain minimum percentage benchmarks concerning the portion of the vehicle produced by workers who meet certain wage requirements, as described in subparts B, C, and D.
#### § 779.108 Goods produced for commerce.

Goods are “produced for commerce” if they are “produced, manufactured, mined, handled or in any other manner worked on” in any State for sale, trade, transportation, transmission, shipment or delivery, to any place outside thereof. Goods are produced for commerce where the producer intends, hopes, expects, or has reason to believe that the goods or any unsegregated part of them will move (in the same or in an altered form or as a part or ingredient of other goods) in interstate or foreign commerce. If such movement of the goods in commerce can reasonably be anticipated by the producer when the goods are produced, it makes no difference whether he himself or the person to whom the goods are transferred puts the goods in interstate or foreign commerce. The fact that goods do move in interstate or foreign commerce is strong evidence that the producer intended, hoped, expected, or had reason to believe that they would so move. Goods produced to serve the movement of interstate commerce within the same State are also produced for commerce within the meaning of the Act, as explained in part 776 of this chapter.
-

                                   EXHIBIT 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each  of  the non employee Directors of MacDermid, Incorporated signed identical
powers  of  attorney  in  the  following  form:
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------
KNOW  ALL  MEN  BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, a director of MacDermid,
Incorporated,  hereby  constitutes  and  appoints  Daniel H. Leever the true and
lawful  agent  and  attorney-in-fact  of  the  undersigned,  with full power and
authority  in  said  agent  and  attorney-in-fact  to  delegate the power herein
conferred to any person or persons said agent and attorney-in-fact shall select,
to  sign  in  the  place of the undersigned in his capacity as a director of the
Corporation,  the  Form 10-K for the transition year ended December 31, 2001, of
the  Corporation  to  be  filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission,
Washington,  D.C.,  under  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
sign  any  amendment  or  amendments  to  such  Form  10-K; hereby ratifying and
confirming  all  acts  taken  by  such  agent  and  attorney-in-fact  as  herein
authorized.
                                  (Signature)*
February  26,  2002
*  The  Directors  who  signed  the  powers  of  attorney  were:
     Robert  Ecklin
     Donald  G.  Ogilvie
     Joseph  M.  Silvestri
     James  C.  Smith
     T.  Quinn  Spitzer,  Jr.
#### § 779.257 Exemption applicable to gasoline service establishments under the prior Act.

Section 13(b)(8) of the prior Act (before the 1966 amendments) contained an exemption from the overtime pay requirements for “any employee of a gasoline service station”. This exemption was applicable prior to February 1, 1967, without regard to the annual gross volume of sales of the gasoline service station by which the employee was employed. The removal of this exemption by the 1966 amendments brought non-exempt employees of covered gasoline service stations within the purview of the overtime requirements of the Act for the first time.
TED STRICKLAND 


GOVERNOR 


STATE OF OHIO 


March 9, 20 I 0 

Bharat Mathur 


Acting Regional Administrator 


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 


77 West Jackson Boulevard 


Chicago, Illinois 60604 


Dear Administrator Mathur: 

Please accept this letter as my formal notification that the State of Ohio supports 

the inclusion of the Milford Contaminated Aquifer site in Clermont County. on the next 

proposed National Priorities List (NPL) update. Federally-funded CERCLA site 

assessments completed by Ohio EPA have documented that this site poses a 

significant threat to public health and the environment. These assessments also 

conclude that this site is eligible to be placed on the NPL. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Ted Strickland 

Governor 

ec: 	 Chris Korleski, Director, Ohio EPA 


Cindy Hafner, Chief, DERR, Ohio EPA 


Tiffani Kavalec, Manager, DERR, Ohio EPA 


77 SOUTH HIGH STREET" 30TH FLOOR" COLUMBUS, OHIO 432t5~6117 .. 614.466.3555 co FAX: 614.466.9354
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1998  
<CASH>                                               357,000      
<SECURITIES>                                               0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                         93,300      
<ALLOWANCES>                                           6,000      
<INVENTORY>                                                0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     444,300      
<PP&E>                                             1,079,200      
<DEPRECIATION>                                       333,200      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,414,400      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              4,984,800      
<BONDS>                                            4,028,400      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                                0  
<COMMON>                                               1,500      
<OTHER-SE>                                       (12,966,400)     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,414,400      
<SALES>                                                    0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     152,000      
<CGS>                                                      0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,099,500      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       6,000      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,425,100)     
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (2,425,100)     
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0  
<CHANGES>                                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,425,100)     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (1.43)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (1.43)     
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAAA.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL 
INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM, including consideration of 
personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of 
individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAAA.
    Date: August 31-September 1, 2011.
    Time: August 31, 2011, 7:45 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Laboratory of Clinical and 
Translational Studies.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Time: September 1, 2011, 7:45 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Laboratory of Neuroimaging.
    Place: National Institutes of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Terrance Level Room 508/509, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Trish Scullion, Chief of Administrative Branch, 
National Institute of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse 
and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3061, Rockville, MD 20852, 
301-443-6076.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 4, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20317 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P