alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Environmental Protection Agency Electronic Docket Index for [EPA - R09 - OAR - 201 6 - 0 240 ] Revisions to Implement ation Plans, State of California, Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District New Source Review Program I. SIP Submittal Documents I - A SIP submittal letter from CARB, dated December 11, 2014 I - B SIP submittal letter from CARB, dated 10 - 18 - 85 I - C Rule 130

– Definitions , clean copy I - D Rule 20 0

– Permit Requirements , clean copy I - E Rule 2 20

– New Source Review , clean copy I - F Rule 230

– Action on Applications, clean copy I - G Rule 240

– Permit to Operate, clean copy I - H Rule 130

– Definitions , strike out copy I - I Rule 20 0

– Permit Requirements , strike out copy I - J Rule 2 20

– New Source Review , strike out copy I - K Rule 230

– Action on Applications, strike out copy I - L Rule 240

– Permit to Operate, strike out copy I - M Staff Report: PSD and SIP Amendments 2014 II. Federal Register Notice s 1 II - A 37 FR 19812, September 22, 1972 (Repealed rules) II - B 43 FR 59489, December 21, 1978 (R240e) II - C 45 FR 72148, October 31, 1980 (R240) II - D 50 FR 30943, July 31, 1985 (SIP approval) II - E 57 FR 13498 , April 16, 1992 ( Title I General Preamble ) II - F 73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008 II - G 75 FR 64864, October 20, 2010 II - H 76 FR 26192, May 6, 2011 (Rule 130) II - I 80 FR 50199 August 19, 2015 (Subject to regulation vacatur ) III. Other Relevant Documents III - A Submittal Completeness Letter, February 20, 2015 III - B Recession Request Letter , February 11, 2016 1 All Federal Register notices listed after 1993 are available on - line at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FRIII - C EPA’s Technical Support Document for NSC APCD Rules 130 , 200, 220, 2 30 & 2 40 , April 18, 2016 III - D Rule 10

– Permits Required III - E Rule 12

– Transfer III - F Rule 18

– Conditional Approval II I - G Rule 130

– Definitions III - H Rule 200

– Permit Requirements III - I Rule 200a

– Permit Requirements III - J Rule 220a

– New Source Review III - K Rule 220b

– New Source Review III - L Rule 220c

– New Source Review III - M Rule 230

– Action on Applications III - N Rule 240

– Permit to Operate III - O Rule 240e

– Mandatory Monitoring Requirements I V. EPA Rulemaking Documents IV - A Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking ,
#### § 780.144 “As an incident to or in conjunction with” the farming operations.

In order for practices other than actual farming operations to constitute “agriculture” within the meaning of section 3(f) of the Act, it is not enough that they be performed by a farmer or on a farm in connection with the farming operations conducted by such farmer or on such farm, as explained in §§ 780.129 through 780.143. They must also be performed “as an incident to or in conjunction with” these farming operations. The line between practices that are and those that are not performed “as an incident to or in conjunction with” such farming operations is not susceptible of precise definition. Generally, a practice performed in connection with farming operations is within the statutory language only if it constitutes an established part of agriculture, is subordinate to the farming operations involved, and does not amount to an independent business. Industrial operations (*Holtville Alfalfa Mills* v. *Wyatt,* 230 F. 2d 398) and processes that are more akin to manufacturing than to agriculture (*Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254; *Mitchell* v. *Budd,* 350 U.S. 473) are not included. This is also true when on-the-farm practices are performed for a farmer. As to when practices may be regarded as performed for a farmer, see § 780.143.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5373-5374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2037]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2011-0010]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Medium Term 
Guarantee.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission 
is to create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through 
direct loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credits. By 
neutralizing the effect of export credit support offered by foreign 
governments and by absorbing credit risks that the private sector will 
not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. exporters to compete fairly in 
foreign markets on the basis of price and product. Under the Medium 
Term Guarantee Program, Ex-Im Bank provides guarantees of principal and 
interest on floating or fixed-rate loans by eligible lenders to credit 
worthy buyers of US goods and services. The guarantee covers the 
repayment risks on the foreign buyer's debt obligations. Ex-Im Bank 
guarantees that, in the event of a payment default by the borrower, it 
will repay the lender the outstanding principal and interest on the 
loan.
    In the event that a borrower defaults on a transaction guaranteed 
by Ex-Im Bank the guaranteed lender may seek payment by the submission 
of a claim. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 
USC 635(a)(1), to determine if such claim complies with the terms and 
conditions of the relevant guarantee agreement.

[[Page 5374]]

    This form can be reviewed http://www.exim.gov\pub\pending\EIB10--
05.pdf

DATES: Comments should be received on or before (insert 30 days after 
publication) to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW. Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-NEW.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Titles and Form Number: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Medium 
Term Guarantee (EIB 10-05).
    OMB Number: 3048-XXXX.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: This collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 
information necessary to process the filing of a claim for a defaulted 
transaction under Ex-Im Bank's Medium Term Guarantee program.
    Number of respondents: 65.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-2037 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
#### JOYCE SENIOR *v.*DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

(AC 19153)

Foti, Landau and Schaller, Js.

Argued January 10

officially released February 1, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Logo]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Saville Systems PLC

In
our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in shareholders' equity and of cash flows (not presented separately
herein) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Saville Systems PLC and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 1998, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the
United States which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above. The financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 1997 and for
the year then ended were audited by other independent accountants, whose report dated January 22, 1998 (except for Comprehensive Income and Note 15 as to which date is March 12, 1999), expressed an
unqualified opinion on those statements.

/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERSPricewaterhouseCoopers
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors
Dublin, Ireland
March 2, 1999
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Maria Henry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial position and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Maria Henry         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Maria Henry             |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 6, 2004     |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Vastera, Inc. and will beretained by Vastera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense Personnel and Readiness, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board. The purpose                               ( print page 50720)                            of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VII of Public Law 102-183, as amended.                    

# DATES:

September 8, 2011, from 1 p.m.-5:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill, 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Alison Patz, Program Analyst, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. Electronic mail address:                         *Alison.patz@wso.whs.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Security Education Board Members meeting is open to the public. The public is afforded the opportunity to submit written statements associated with National Security Education Program (NSEP).

Dated: August 11, 2011.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2011-20819 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### § 780.159 Forest products.

Trees grown in forests and the lumber derived therefrom are not agricultural or horticultural commodities, for the purpose of the FLSA. (*See* § 780.205 regarding production of Christmas trees.) It follows that employment in the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of such trees or timber products is not sufficient to bring an employee within sec. 3(f) unless the operation is performed by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with his or its farming operations. On the latter point, see §§ 780.200 through 780.209 discussing the question of when forestry or lumbering operations are incident to or in conjunction with farming operations so as to constitute agriculture. For a discussion of the exemption in sec. 13(b)(28) of the Act for certain forestry and logging operations in which not more than eight employees are employed, see part 788 of this chapter.

[73 FR 77238, Dec. 18, 2008. Redesignated at 74 FR 26014, May 29, 2009]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 74 FR 26014, May 29, 2009, § 780.115 was redesignated as § 780.159 and newly designated § 780.159 was suspended, effective June 29, 2009.
§ 35.22 Information requirements. Each recipient shall: ( a ) Keep such records as CRC determines are necessary to ascertain whether the recipient is complying with the Act and this part;
( b ) Upon request, provide CRC with such information and reports as the Director determines are necessary to ascertain whether the recipient is complying with the Act and this part; and
( c ) Permit reasonable access by CRC to books, records, accounts, reports, other recipient facilities and other sources of information to the extent CRC determines is necessary to ascertain whether the recipient is complying with the Act and this part.
EXHIBIT 31.4  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Terry A. Hanson Terry A. Hanson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Date: February 26, 2007
§ 4050.401 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *In general.* This subpart describes PBGC's missing participants program for multiemployer defined benefit retirement plans covered by title IV of ERISA. The missing participants program is a program to hold retirement benefits for missing participants and beneficiaries in retirement plans that are closing out and to help them find and receive the benefits being held for them. For a plan to which this subpart applies, this subpart describes what the plan must do upon plan termination if it has missing participants or beneficiaries who are entitled to distributions. This subpart applies to a plan only if it is a multiemployer defined benefit plan that— ( 1 ) Is described in section 4021(a) of ERISA and not in any paragraph of section 4021(b) of ERISA, and
( 2 ) Completes the process of closing out under subpart D of PBGC's regulation on Termination of Multiemployer Plans (29 CFR part 4041A).
( b ) *Plans that terminate but do not close out.* This subpart does not apply to plans that terminate but do not close out.
( c ) *Individual account plans.* This subpart does not apply to an individual account plan under section 3(34) of ERISA, even if it is described in the same plan document as a plan to which this subpart applies. This subpart also does not apply to a plan to the extent that it is treated as an individual account plan under section 3(35)(B) of ERISA. For example, this subpart does not apply to employee contributions (or interest or earnings thereon) held as an individual account. (Subpart B deals with individual account plans.)
#### § 779.250 Goods that have not lost their out-of-State identity.

Goods which are purchased or received by the enterprise from within the State will be considered goods which “have moved across State lines” if they have previously been moved across State lines and have not lost their identity as out-of-State goods before they are purchased or received by the enterprise. Also goods which have been assembled within the State after they were moved across State lines but before they are purchased or received by the enterprise will still be regarded as goods which “have moved across State lines.” Such goods are still identifiable as goods brought into the State. This is also true in certain cases where goods are processed to some extent without losing their identity as out-of-State goods. For example, out-of-State furniture or television sets which are put together within the State, or milk from outside the State which is pasteurized and bottled within the State, before being purchased or received by the enterprise, are goods which “have moved across State lines.” They have already moved across State lines and they retain their out-of-State identity, despite the assembly or processing within the State.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION 

ROADSTER SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION 

350 Legget Drive 
 Kanata, Ontario

 Canada K2K 2W7 
 April 20,
2015 
 [Stockholder] 
 [Address] 

[Address] 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to that certain Tender Support Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2015 (the “Tender Support Agreement”),
by and among you, Mitel Networks Corporation, a Canadian corporation (“Parent”), and Roadster Subsidiary Corporation, a Delaware corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”). 

Pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Tender Support Agreement, Parent and Merger Sub hereby waive and fully release and discharge you from all of
your covenants and obligations under Sections 1.1 (Agreement to Tender), 2.1 (Voting of Subject Shares) and 2.6 (Intervening Event) of the Tender Support Agreement. All other sections of the Tender Support Agreement shall be
unmodified and remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of the Tender Support Agreement. 
 This letter shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law that would require the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. 

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] 








					
	Very truly yours,
	
	MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
		
	By:		  

			Name:		
			Title:		


  

					
	ROADSTER SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION
		
	By:		  

			Name:		
			Title:		


 [Signature Page to Waiver Letter]
**EXHIBIT 31.2  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MGE Energy, Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

> 
	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be    designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in    which this report is being prepared; 

	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to    be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting    and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted    accounting principles;

 c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered    by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred    during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially    affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and