alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 114.01 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the rules and regulations in this subchapter is to implement certain laws and set forth the requirements for: ( 1 ) Locations and clearances of bridges and causeways over the navigable waters;
( 2 ) Administration of the alteration of unreasonably obstructive bridges; and
( 3 ) Regulation of drawbridge operation.
( b ) The rules and regulations in this subchapter also describe the procedures, practices, and instructions, which are applicable to the public subject to certain laws governing bridges and causeways over the navigable waters of the United States.
[USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35012, June 19, 2008, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013]
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Internet Cable Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
M. Melanson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2002         By: /s/ Joseph M. Melanson
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Joseph M. Melanson
                                   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00721-CV

HARVEY V. RISIEN, LLC and Harvey V. Risien,

Appellants

v.

MISSARK INVESTMENTS GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP 

Management, LLC,

Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI15535

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order the 

appellees’ brief due December 21, 2018.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 423 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 423

    Seeking the return of the USS Pueblo to the United States Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 23, 2008

   Mr. Allard (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Biden, and Mr. Salazar) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Seeking the return of the USS Pueblo to the United States Navy.

Whereas the USS Pueblo, which was attacked and captured by the Navy of North 
        Korea on January 23, 1968, was the first ship of the United States Navy 
        to be hijacked on the high seas by a foreign military force in more than 
        150 years;
Whereas 1 member of the USS Pueblo crew, Duane Hodges, was killed in the 
        assault, while the other 82 crew members were held in captivity, often 
        under inhumane conditions, for 11 months;
Whereas the USS Pueblo, an intelligence collection auxiliary vessel, was 
        operating in international waters at the time of the capture, and 
        therefore did not violate the territorial waters of North Korea;
Whereas the capture of the USS Pueblo resulted in no reprisals against the 
        Government or people of North Korea and no military action at any time; 
        and
Whereas the USS Pueblo, though still the property of the United States Navy, has 
        been retained by the Government of North Korea for 40 years, was 
        subjected to exhibition in the North Korean cities of Wonsan and 
        Hungham, and is now on display in Pyongyang, the capital city of North 
        Korea: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) desires the return of the USS Pueblo to the United 
        States Navy;
            (2) would welcome the return of the USS Pueblo as a 
        goodwill gesture from the North Korean people to the American 
        people; and
            (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit copies 
        of this resolution to the President, the Secretary of Defense, 
        and the Secretary of State.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-10 Reporting and investigation. ( a ) Any person may report an apparent violation of any law, regulation, or order that is enforced by the Coast Guard to any Coast Guard facility. When a report of an apparent violation has been received, or when an apparent violation has been detected by any Coast Guard personnel, the matter is investigated or evaluated by Coast Guard personnel. Once an apparent violation has been investigated or evaluated, a report of the investigation may be sent to the District Commander or other designated official in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section or a Notice of Violation under § 1.07-11 may be given to the party by an issuing officer.
( b ) Reports of any investigation conducted by the Coast Guard or received from any other agency which indicate that a violation may have occurred may be forwarded to a District Commander or other designated official for further action. This is normally the District Commander of the District in which the violation is believed to have occurred, or the District in which the reporting unit or agency is found. The report is reviewed to determine if there is sufficient evidence to establish a *prima facie* case. If there is insufficient evidence, the case is either returned for further investigation or closed if further action is unwarranted. The case is closed in situations in which the investigation has established that a violation did not occur, the violator is unknown, or there is little likelihood of discovering additional relevant facts. If it is determined that a *prima facie* case does exist, a case file is prepared and forwarded to the Hearing Officer, with a recommended action. A record of any prior violations by the same person or entity, is forwarded with the case file.
[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by CGD 87-008a, 52 FR 17554, May 11, 1987; CGD 93-079, 59 FR 16560, Apr. 7, 1994; USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40054, June 29, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Southwestern Power Administration


Integrated System Power Rates: Correction

AGENCY: Southwestern Power Administration, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of public review and comment; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Southwestern Power Administration published a document in the 
Federal Register (76 FR 48159) on August 8, 2011, announcing the public 
review and comment period on proposed rates. Inadvertently, the date 
listed for the combined Public Information and Comment Forum (Forum) 
was erroneously listed in the DATES section as of August 16, 2011. The 
correct date and time for the Forum, if requested, will be August 30, 
2011, at 9 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James K. McDonald, Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Corporate Operations, Southwestern Power 
Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, One West Third Street, 
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, (918) 595-6690, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b9babefdbeb0b7bcbdb2bfb793a0a4a3b2fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92f8fbffbcfff1f6fdfcf3fef6d2e1e5e2f3bcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 10, 2011.
Jon Worthington,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-20934 Filed 8-12-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**90 CA 10-01103**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

VERIZON NEW YORK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

LABARGE BROTHERS CO., INC. AND LABARGE COMPANIES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 4.)

EDWARD C. COSGROVE, BUFFALO (JAMES C. COSGROVE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (ANN MAGNARELLI ALEXANDER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered March 4, 2010. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew and reargue.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied those parts of plaintiff’s motion for leave to reargue its opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for leave to reargue its cross motion is unanimously dismissed and the order is otherwise affirmed without costs ( see Verizon New York, Inc. v LaBarge Bros. Co., Inc . [appeal No. 1], ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 10, 2011]).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
[No. 28184-8-II.

Division Two.

November 8, 2002.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Steven Lee Shipman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 01-1-00374-4, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered December 6, 2001. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J., concurred in by Houghton and Armstrong, JJ.
Specimen of Stock Certificate evidencing shares of E Preferred Stock



 Exhibit 4.6 

	
	





  

Exhibit 4.6 
 See Legends on Reverse 
 Incorporated Under the
Laws of the State of Delaware 
 KALOBIOS PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC. 
 This Certifies that <<Stockholder>> is the registered holder of
<<SharesText>> (<<SharesNo>>) Shares of Series E Preferred Stock transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

 In Witness Whereof , the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
officers this <<Day>> day of <<Month>> A.D. <<YEAR>>. 
 PREFERRED

 Secretary or Assistant Secretary 
 President or Vice President 







 



 
  
 THE SHARES
REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION THEREOF UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, SATISFACTORY TO THE
COMPANY AND ITS COUNSEL, THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED. 
 For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated 20

 In presence of 
 NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.
§ 93.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 93.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
#### § 793.12 Related and incidental work.

An employee who is employed primarily in one or more of the named occupations may also be engaged in other duties pertaining to the operation of the station by which he is employed. The Senate Report states that, for purposes of this exemption, employees who are primarily employed in the named occupation “may engage in related activities, including the sale of broadcasting time for the broadcasting company by which they are employed, as an incident to their principal occupation”, (S. Rept. 145, 87th Cong., 1st sess., p. 37). Time spent in such duties will not be considered to defeat the exemption if the employee is primarily employed in the named occupations and if the other requirements of the exemption are met.
#### § 780.5 Significance of official interpretations.

The regulations in this part contain the official interpretations of the Department of Labor with respect to the application under described circumstances of the provisions of law which they discuss. These interpretations indicate the construction of the law which the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator believe to be correct and which will guide them in the performance of their duties under the Act unless and until they are otherwise directed by authoritative decisions of the courts or conclude, upon reexamination of an interpretation, that it is incorrect.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.08-1 Applicability. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart apply to certain violations of the following statutes and regulations for which Coast Guard boarding officers are authorized to issue written warnings instead of recommending civil or criminal penalty procedures under subpart 1.07 of this part: ( 1 ) 46 CFR 25.05 whistles or other sound producing devices;
( 2 ) 33 CFR part 175, subpart B and 46 CFR subpart 25.25, Personal Flotation Devices.
( 3 ) 46 CFR 25.35 backfire flame control;
( 4 ) 46 CFR 25.40 ventilation;
( 5 ) 33 CFR part 173 numbering;
( 6 ) 46 U.S.C. 103, documented yachts;
( 7 ) 33 CFR part 155 oil pollution prevention; and
( 8 ) 46 CFR subpart 25.30, Fire Extinguishing Equipment and 33 CFR part 175, subpart E, Fire Protection Equipment;
( 9 ) 33 CFR part 159 marine sanitation devices;
( 10 ) 33 CFR part 175 subpart C, Visual Distress Signals.
( 11 ) 33 CFR 83.01(g) Copy of rules.
( b ) The Commandant authorizes designated boarding officers to issue warnings for certain minor violations of the statutes and regulations listed in paragraph (a) of this section. Written warnings are not authorized for all violations of these statutes and regulations.
(14 U.S.C. 503, 85 Stat. 228 (46 U.S.C. 1488); 86 Stat. 871 (33 U.S.C. 1322); 49 CFR 1.46(b), (m), and (n)(1))
[CGD 74-155, 41 FR 17894, Apr. 29, 1976, as amended by CGD 77-182, 43 FR 22657, May 25, 1978; CGD 82-040, 47 FR 21042, May 17, 1982; CGD 85-009, 50 FR 10761, Mar. 18, 1985; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30877, June 28, 2019; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58275, Sept. 18, 2020; USCG-2018-0099, 86 FR 58571, Oct. 22, 2021]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.171 Middle River. ( a ) The draw of the San Joaquin County (Bacon Island Road) highway bridge, mile 8.6 between Bacon Island and Lower Jones Tract, shall open on signal from May 15 through September 15 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. From September 16 through May 14, the draw shall open on signal from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. from Thursday through Monday. At all other times, the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given to the San Joaquin County Department of Public Works at Stockton.
( b ) The draw of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad bridge, mile 9.8 near Middle River Station, shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Manager of Structures at San Bernardino.
( c ) The removable span of the Woodward Island Bridge, mile 11.8 near Discovery Bay, shall be removed as soon as possible upon notification by the District Commander that an emergency exists which requires its removal.
( d ) The California Route 4 Bridge, mile 15.1, between Victoria Island and Drexler Tract need not open for the passage of vessels.
[CGD 82-025, 49 FR 17452, Apr. 24, 1984; 49 FR 37381, Sept. 24, 1984, as amended by CGD 12-85-01, 50 FR 26559, June 27, 1985; USCG-2000-7223, 65 FR 40056, June 29, 2000; USCG-2020-0137, 86 FR 1807, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### Brooks v. Blackwell, *Appellant.*

1, Evidence. It is error to admit evidence upon a matter not put in issue by the pleadings.

2. Mechanic’s Lien : practice. It is error for the court to establish a mechanic’s lien without a finding by the jury that the plaintiff is entitled to the lien. - ■

*Appeal from Jasper Circuit*Court.—Hon. Joseph Cravens, Judge.

Reversed.

*Clark Craycroft*and *M. G. McGregor*for appellant.

*T. J. Howell*for respondent.

Hough, J.

This is a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien for labor performed by the plaintiff, under a contract with the defendant for the erection of a brick house in the town of Joplin. The defendant pleaded that the plaintiff failed to construct said house according to the terms of his contract, and that the work was so unskillfully performed that one of the walls had to be taken down and re-built by him at a cost of $1,800, for which sum, and other damages set forth in his answer, he prayed judgment over against the *310plaintiff, and also denied the facts set forth by the plaintiff as entitling him to a lien. The plaintiff traversed the affirmative allegations in the defendant’s answer. Certain mortgagees of the property sought to be charged, were made defendants, but as they have not appealed it will be unnecessary to notice the pleadings filed by them. Judg-, ment was rendered for the plaintiff for $340, and a mechanic’s iien for the same established by the court.

The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed. The plaintiff was improperly allowed to introduce testimony tending to show that the defendant Blackwell assumed control and direction of the work, and that the defect alleged therein was the result of such control and direction, and was not occasioned by any fault, negligence or unskillfulness on the part of the plaintiff. No such issue was made by the pleadings.

Besides, there was no finding by the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to a lien, nor were the issues relating thereto submitted by the court to the jury. *Williams v. Porter,*51 Mo. 441; *Hall v. Johnson,*57 Mo. 521. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

All concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 6886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02354]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Tennessee Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the Tennessee 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 10:00 a.m. Central Time on Wednesday, February 19, 
2014. The purpose of the meeting is for the Committee to discuss its 
report to the Commission on ex-felon voting rights.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: 877-446-3914, conference ID: 2895602. Any 
interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the 
meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate 
over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred 
charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over 
land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with 
hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling 
the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service 
with the conference call number and conference ID number.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by March 19, 2014. The 
address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Southern Regional Office, 
61 Forsyth St., Suite 16T126, Atlanta, GA 30303. Comments may also be 
emailed to Peter Minarik at pminarik@usccr.gov.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated: Dated January 30, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-02354 Filed 2-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
- Contents
- Introduction
- Cohort Mortality
- Cohort Survivorship
- Discussion
- Reference
- Appendix I. Relationship Between Cohort and Period Mortality
- Appendix II. Production of the Single-Year Data
- Appendix III. Construction of the Cohort and Period Survivorship Tables