alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 784.123 Operations performed on fishing equipment.

On the principle stated in § 784.122 the replacement, repair, mending, or construction of the fisherman's equipment performed at the place of the fishing operation would be exempt. Such activities performed in contemplation of the trip are also within the exemption if the work is so closely related both in point of time and function to the acquisition of the aquatic life that it is really a part of the fishing operation or of “going to * * * work.” For example, under appropriate facts, the repair of the nets, or of the vessel, or the building of fish trap frames on the shore immediately prior to the opening of the fishing season would be within the exemption. Activities at the termination of a fishing trip which are similarly related in time and function to the actual conduct of fishing operations or “returning from work” may be within the exemption on like principles. Similarly, the fact that the exemption is intended generally for “offshore” activities does not mean that it may not apply to employment in other activities performed on shore which are so integrated with the conduct of actual fishing operations and functionally so necessary thereto that the employment is, in practical effect, directly and necessarily a part of the fishing operations for which the exemption is intended. In such circumstances the exemption will apply, for example, to an employee employed by a vessel owner to watch the fishing vessel, its equipment, and the catch when it comes to port, checks the mooring lines, operate bilge pumps and heating and cooling systems on the vessel, and assist in the loading and unloading of the fishing equipment and the catch. Work of the kinds referred to may be exempt when performed by the fisherman himself or necessary to the conduct of the fishing organization. However, the exemption would not apply to employees of a manufacturer of supplies or to employees of independent shops which repair boats and equipment. (*Dize* v. *Maddix,* 144 F. 2d 584, affirmed 324 U.S. 697.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

[Docket No. 110524296-1455-02]


Models for a Governance Structure for the National Strategy for 
Trusted Identities in Cyberspace--Extension of Due Date for Comments

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), United 
States Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIST is extending the deadline for submitting comments 
regarding the governance structure for the National Strategy for 
Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) to 3 p.m. Eastern Time, August 
30, 2011. NIST will accept only electronic submissions during the 
extended time period.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than 3 p.m. Eastern Time 
August 30, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Electronic comments may be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85cbd6d1ccc6ebeaecc5ebecf6f1abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9b7aaadb0ba979690b997908a8dd79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross J. Micheals via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0674697575286b6f656e63676a7546686f757228616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b5944585805464248434e4a47586b4542585f054c445d">[email protected]</span></a> or telephone (301) 975-3234.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 14, 2011, the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology (NIST) announced that it was soliciting 
comments on potential models for the formation and structure of the 
Identity Ecosystem governance body. The due date for submission of 
comments was July 22, 2011. Due to requests from the public and in 
order to provide all interested parties the opportunity to submit 
comments, NIST is extending the solicitation period until 3 p.m. 
Eastern Time, August 30, 2011. Proposals received between July 22, 2011 
and the publication date of this notice of extension shall be deemed 
timely and will be given full consideration. Persons who submitted 
comments between July 22, 2011 and the date of publication of this 
notice need not resubmit their comments. During the extended 
solicitation period, NIST will accept only electronic submissions.
    Some members of the public submitted several versions of their 
comments. In those cases, NIST will consider and post only the last 
version received.

    Dated: August 9, 2011.
Willie E. May,
Associate Director for Laboratory Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-20816 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 2704.302 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the Secretary of Labor may file an answer to the application. Unless counsel requests an extension of time for filing, files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b), or a proceeding is stayed pursuant to § 206(b), failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If counsel for the Secretary and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the administrative law judge upon request by counsel for the Secretary and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the position of the Secretary of Labor. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the underlying proceeding, counsel shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 2704.306 of this part.
[63 FR 63176, Nov. 12, 1998, as amended at 71 FR 44210, Aug. 4, 2006]
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.2

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Morton Industrial Group, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 
333-68927 and 333-69575) on Form S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our 
report dated February 4, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of 
Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and 
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity 
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended 
June 30, 1997, and the six months ended December 31, 1997, and the related 
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1998, annual report on 
Form 10-K of Morton Industrial Group, Inc.



CLIFTON GUNDERSON L.L.C.
Peoria, Illinois
March 29, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

                               UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officers  of Patron  Systems,  Inc.,  a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  do hereby  certify  with  respect  to the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

1.       the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: August 2, 2005                          /S/ ROBERT CROSS
                                              --------------------------------

                                              Robert Cross

                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              & Acting Chief Financial Officer
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 130 

Designating July 28, 2007, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2007 

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. CORNYN, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

BAUCUS, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DOMENICI, 

Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ENZI, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. REID) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

MAY 17, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

MAY 21, 2007 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 28, 2007, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as cowboys, 

helped establish the American West; 

Whereas that cowboy spirit continues to infuse the Nation 

with its solid character, sound family values, and good 

common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

SRES 130 ATS 

Whereas the cowboy loves, lives off of, and depends on the 

land and its creatures, and is an excellent steward, protecting and enhancing the environment; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to play a significant role in the 

culture and economy of the United States; 

Whereas approximately 800,000 ranchers in all 50 States are 

conducting business and contributing to the economic 

well-being of nearly every county in the Nation; 

Whereas rodeo is the sixth most-watched sport in the United 

States; 

Whereas membership in rodeo and other organizations encompassing the livelihood of a cowboy transcends race 

and sex and spans every generation; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; 

Whereas to recognize the American cowboy is to acknowledge 

the ongoing commitment of the United States to an esteemed and enduring code of conduct; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys to their 

communities should be recognized and encouraged: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 28, 2007, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          33,946
<SECURITIES>                                     2,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,525
<INVENTORY>                                     36,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,093
<PP&E>                                         179,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 392,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,461
<BONDS>                                        219,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   392,620
<SALES>                                        451,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,880
<CGS>                                          390,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  434,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,021
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                     832
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,843
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William D. Morton, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/WILLIAM D. MORTON                                                 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|William D. Morton Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2003 |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

---

QuickLinks
#### § 97.5 Effect on other issuances.

All other grants administration provisions of codified program regulations, program manuals, handbooks and other nonregulatory materials which are inconsistent with this part are superseded, except to the extent they are required by statute, or authorized in accordance with the exception provision in § 97.6.
§ 785.19 Meal. ( a ) *Bona fide meal periods.* Bona fide meal periods are not worktime. Bona fide meal periods do not include coffee breaks or time for snacks. These are rest periods. The employee must be completely relieved from duty for the purposes of eating regular meals. Ordinarily 30 minutes or more is long enough for a bona fide meal period. A shorter period may be long enough under special conditions. The employee is not relieved if he is required to perform any duties, whether active or inactive, while eating. For example, an office employee who is required to eat at his desk or a factory worker who is required to be at his machine is working while eating. (*Culkin* v. *Glenn L. Martin, Nebraska Co.,* 97 F. Supp. 661 (D. Neb. 1951), aff'd 197 F. 2d 981 (C.A. 8, 1952), cert. denied 344 U.S. 888 (1952); *Thompson* v. *Stock & Sons, Inc.,* 93 F. Supp. 213 (E.D. Mich 1950), aff'd 194 F. 2d 493 (C.A. 6, 1952); *Biggs* v. *Joshua Hendy Corp.,* 183 F. 2d 515 (C. A. 9, 1950), 187 F. 2d 447 (C.A. 9, 1951); *Walling* v. *Dunbar Transfer & Storage Co.,* 3 W.H. Cases 284; 7 Labor Cases para. 61.565 (W.D. Tenn. 1943); *Lofton* v. *Seneca Coal and Coke Co.,* 2 W.H. Cases 669; 6 Labor Cases para. 61,271 (N.D. Okla. 1942); aff'd 136 F. 2d 359 (C.A. 10, 1943); cert. denied 320 U.S. 772 (1943); *Mitchell* v. *Tampa Cigar Co.,* 36 Labor Cases para. 65, 198, 14 W.H. Cases 38 (S.D. Fla. 1959); *Douglass* v. *Hurwitz Co.,* 145 F. Supp. 29, 13 W.H. Cases (E.D. Pa. 1956))
( b ) *Where no permission to leave premises.* It is not necessary that an employee be permitted to leave the premises if he is otherwise completely freed from duties during the meal period.
Exhibit 32.2
  
 
 Section 906 Certification
 -------------------------
 
 The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the MLM Index TM Fund.
  November 12, 2010
 
 By: /s/ James A. Mehling
 -------------------------------------------
 Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
 the manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
No. 01-15-00395-CR

EVER RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 X

 X

VS. X FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

 X

 X

THE STATE OF TEXAS X 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

MOTION FOR FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

COMES NOW, EVER RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ, Appellant, and moves 

for an extension of time in which to file the Appellant’s brief, until and including 

Monday, October 12, 2015, and would further show as follows:

A. The deadline for filing the brief in this cause was September 28, 2015; 

B. A request is hereby made for an extension of time to file the Appellant’s 

Brief, until and including Monday, October 12, 2015;

C. The undersigned attorney, Bob Wicoff, has been unusually busy with other 

matters which have kept him from completing the brief by the current deadline, 

including, but not limited to, the following:

KENNETH BROWN VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; NO. 01-15-00357-CR;

Appellant’s Brief due October 5, 2015.

Additionally, the undersigned serves on two panels of the Texas Forensic 

Science Commission, the Hair Microscopy Panel and the DNA Mixture Interpretation 

Panel, both of which consume a large amount of the undersigned’s time and typically 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00395-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/5/2015 12:00:00 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/3/2015 12:13:42 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
require weekly out-of-town travel. Counsel has also spoken at two CLEs in the past 

month, including a symposium in Boston on September 25, 2015 at Northeastern law 

School.

D. Two previous extensions have been granted. No further extensions will be 

needed.

WHEREFORE, the Appellant requests that the deadline for filing his brief in 

this case be extended until and including October 12, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Bob Wicoff__________

BOB WICOFF

1201 Franklin, Thirteenth Floor

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 274-6781

TBA No. 21422700

Bob.wicoff@pdo.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true copy of this motion has been served electronically on the Harris County 

District Attorney’s Office Appellate Division on October 3, 2015. 

/s/_Bob Wicoff_________

BOB WICOFF
#### § 786.350 Exclusion from definition of “employee” of volunteers at private non-profit food banks.

Section 3(e)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act excludes from the definition of the term “employee” individuals who volunteer their services solely for humanitarian purposes at private non-profit food banks and who receive groceries from the food banks.

[76 FR 18860, Apr. 5, 2011]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofMaverick Minerals Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 22nd day of May, 2006.



|                                                    | ROBERT KINLOCH
|--------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|Robert Kinloch                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
#### § 783.4 Basic support for interpretations.

The ultimate decisions on interpretations of the Act are made by the courts (*Mitchell* v. *Zachry,* 362 U.S. 310; *Kirschbaum* v. *Walling,* 316 U.S. 517). Court decisions supporting interpretations contained in this part are cited where it is believed they may be helpful. On matters which have not been determined by the courts, it is necessary for the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator to reach conclusions as to the meaning and the application of provisions of the law in order to carry out their responsibilities of administration and enforcement (*Skidmore* v. *Swift,* 323 U.S. 134). In order that these positions may be made known to persons who may be affected by them, official interpretations are issued by the Administrator on the advice of the Solicitor of Labor, as authorized by the Secretary (reorg. Pl. 6 of 1950, 64 Stat. 1263; Gen. Ord. 45A, May 24, 1950, 15 FR 3290). As included in this part, these interpretations are believed to express the intent of the law as reflected in its provisions and as construed by the courts and evidenced by its legislative history. References to pertinent legislative history are made in this part where it appears that they will contribute to a better understanding of the interpretations.
Exhibit
10.21  VantageMed Corporation Amendment
1 to the Management Employment Agreement with James Seiler   This
Amendment 1 is made as of 18 September 2001 by and between VantageMed
Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (the Company or VantageMed) and James
Seiler (Employee).  Whereas, the parties entered into a
Management Employment Agreement on 6 August 1999 (the Management Employment
Agreement).  Whereas, pursuant to Section 1, the
Management Employment Agreement specified a term commencing on the Effective
Date and ending on August 1, 2002.  Whereas pursuant to Section 1, the Management
Employment Agreement specified an annual Base Salary of $120,000.  Whereas, this amendment 1 to the Management
Employment Agreement was ratified and authorized pursuant to a meeting of the
board of Directors of VantageMed on 18 Sep 2001.  NOW, THEREFORE, on consideration of an
extension of the mutual covenants set for in the Management Employment
Agreement, the parties agree as follows:  Section 1 of the Management Employment
Agreement shall be amended as follows:  The Agreement ending date of
August 1, 2002 shall be deleted and replaced with a ending date of August 1,
2004.  The Base Salary amount of
$120,000 shall be deleted and replaced with the Base Salary of $160,000.  The first date the Employee shall be entitled
to be paid at the Amended Base Salary amount shall be 1 November 2001.  All
other terms and conditions of the Management Employment Agreement shall remain
the same.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Management Employment Agreement as of 18 September 2001.  VantageMed Corporation
  
  EMPLOYEEBy:
  /S/ JOEL HARRIS
  
  By:
  /S/ JAMES SEILERJoel HarrisTitle:
  Presidentr
  
  James Seiler