alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,

,1

#

Cohu%msorla?

.

CIC-14 REPORT COLLECTION

REPRODUCTION

COPY

March?.4,1944

).

,

\

‘-

.

PUBUCLYRE1.fMS~

.

..

uk!lls - 55

...---- —. /’

C38

DATA ON THE SOATTEl?INGCRCES SECTIONS

0? CARBONAND HYDRCGEN

Compiledby G. F. Chew

This document

A graphicalcomparisonis given of British

containsJ_ pages

data @ Bretscher

and Murrdl, compiledfrom BM-62, with the standarddata used at Los Alamos, obtainedby Williamsat Minnesotaand recordedin CI?-599.The Ikitish

valuesfor hydrogenscattersomewhatmore than the Americanbut are generallyin good agreement. WiUiam~s data on carbonme considerablymore

detailedthan thoseof Bretscherand Murrhlland show maximanot reveaied

by the latter. No attemptis made here to indicatethe probableerror of

any of the results. .

.J. ___-. _.. -.

..- --”-7--1 /

—

APPROVED FOR PULBIC RELEASE

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
,

.

L.:

--

.#-

,.

,..

.

:4 ‘

i

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
,.

i..

.

.,

:,

-

.:

;-

.

=i- m ml

— 0

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
#### STATE OF FLORIDA v FORMENTO, et al.

Case Nos. 86-010 AC; 86-011 AC and 86-018 AC (County Court Case Nos. 85-75962; 85-76775 and 85-78971)

Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County

May 5, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Jim Smith, Attorney General, and Deborah J. Turner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Barry J. Halpern for appellee.

Before KAYE, MASTOS, GREENBAUM, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The contention of Appellees that the arrest form failed to state sufficient facts to allege the crime is without merit. The arrest form described in detail the offensive nature of the act.

The charging document, while merely tracking the statute, was nonetheless sufficient to properly inform the defendant of the act *157complained of and put the defendant on notice. *Johnson v. State,*351 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1977).

As to the merits of the case, we find the act complained of, i.e. the exposure of one’s sexual organs, specifically the vagina and labia, was done in such a manner as to meet the test of “a lascivious exhibition of those private parts of a person which common propriety required to be customarily covered in the presence of others.” *Hoffman v. Carson,*250 So.2d 891 (Fla. 1971). Furthermore, such display, especially for hire or monetary gain, cannot by any reasonable interpretation, be for any other purpose than an “unlawful indulgence in lust, eager for sexual indulgence, *Chesebrough v. State,*255 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1971).

In addition, such acts performed before only one person are none the less lewd, since the performance was one designed to attract the public and not contemplated to be held in the privacy of one’s home, *Chesebrough,*supra, at 678.

For the reasons above we feel the lower court erred in granting dismissal of the State’s charge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 14, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Silicon Valley Bancshares, Inc., Santa Clara, California; to 
engage de novo through its subsidiary, SVB Strategic Investors Fund, 
L.P., Santa Clara, California, in acting as investment or financial 
advisor directly or indirectly, pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(6) of 
Regulation Y.


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 25, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13605 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
III 

Calendar No. 337 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 22 

Reaffirming the constitutional and statutory protections accorded sealed 

domestic mail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2007 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. 

AKAKA, Mr. FEINGOLD, and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the constitutional and statutory protections 

accorded sealed domestic mail, and for other purposes. 

Whereas all Americans depend on the United States Postal 

Service to transact business and communicate with 

friends and family; 

Whereas postal customers have a constitutional right to expect that their sealed domestic mail will be protected 

against unreasonable searches; 

Whereas the circumstances and procedures under which the 

Government may search sealed mail are well defined, inVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:43 Sep 05, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR22.RS SR22

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 22 RS 

cluding provisions under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), and generally require prior judicial approval; 

Whereas the United States Postal Inspection Service has the 

authority to open and search a sealed envelope or package when there is immediate threat to life or limb or an 

immediate and substantial danger to property; 

Whereas the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act 

(Public Law 109–435) expressly reaffirmed the right of 

postal customers to have access to a class of mail sealed 

against inspection; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service affirmed January 

4, 2007, that the enactment of the Postal Accountability 

and Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435) does not 

grant Federal law enforcement officials any new authority to open domestic mail; 

Whereas the signing statement on the Postal Accountability 

and Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435) issued by 

President Bush on December 20, 2006, raises questions 

about the President’s commitment to abide by these basic 

privacy protections; and 

Whereas the Senate rejects any interpretation of the President’s signing statement on the Postal Accountability and 

Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435) that in any way 

diminishes the privacy protections accorded sealed domestic mail under the Constitution and Federal laws and 

regulations: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate reaffirms the constitutional 

2 and statutory protections accorded sealed domestic mail. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 337 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 22 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the constitutional and statutory protecother purposes. tions accorded sealed domestic mail, and for 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: October 13, 2005



/s/ DAVID M. BUCKLEYDavid M. BuckleyChief Executive Officer
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1275

_____________

Carmen C. Reul, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United

v. * States District Court for

* the District of Minnesota.

Manpower International, Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: November 17, 1997

Filed: November 26, 1997

_____________

Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Carmen C. Reul appeals from a summary judgment entered by the District Court1

in favor of Manpower International, Inc., a temporary employment agency and the

defendant in Reul's action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota

Human Rights Act. Having reviewed the case, we are satisfied the District Court

properly concluded that Reul failed to come forward with sufficient evidence to create

a question of fact as to whether Manpower's legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for
-2-

not placing her in any positions were a pretext for unlawful discrimination. Summary

judgment thus was correctly entered.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 106.115 Compliance documentation. Each OCS facility owner or operator subject to this part must ensure that copies of the following documentation are available at the OCS facility and are made available to the Coast Guard upon request: ( a ) The approved Facility Security Plan (FSP) and any approved revisions or amendments thereto, and a letter of approval from the cognizant District Commander dated within the last 5 years;
( b ) The FSP submitted for approval and current written acknowledgment from the cognizant District Commander, stating that the Coast Guard is currently reviewing the FSP submitted for approval and that the OCS facility may continue to operate so long as the OCS facility remains in compliance with the submitted FSP; or
( c ) For OCS facilities operating under a Coast Guard-approved Alternative Security Program as provided in § 106.135, a copy of the Alternative Security Program the OCS facility is using, including a facility specific security assessment report generated under the Alternative Security Program, as specified in § 101.120(b)(3) of this subchapter, and a letter signed by the OCS facility owner or operator, stating which Alternative Security Program the OCS facility is using and certifying that the OCS facility is in full compliance with that program.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60558, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016]
1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3755

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Hubert Ruff, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 7, 2009

Filed: April 10, 2009

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Hubert Ruff appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after revoking his

supervised release. He argues that the court abused its discretion by imposing a term

of imprisonment that was unreasonable and excessive, and that the court made an error

of judgment in balancing the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion. First, the 18-month prison term imposed by the court was below the
-2-

relevant statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (for Class A felony,

maximum term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release is 5 years).

Second, the district court appropriately considered factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a),

including the applicable advisory Guidelines range. See Gall v. United States, 128 S.

Ct. 586, 597 (2007) (review standard); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16

(8th Cir. 2009) (court reviews district court’s revocation sentencing decision using

same standards applied to initial sentencing decisions); United States v. Nelson, 453

F.3d 1004, 1006 (8th Cir. 2006) (appellate court reviews revocation sentence to

determine whether it is unreasonable in relation to, inter alia, advisory Guidelines

range and other § 3553(a) factors); see also United States v. Todd, 521 F.3d 891, 897

(8th Cir. 2008) (in imposing sentence, district court need not mechanically recite

§ 3553(a) factors, especially when applying advisory Guidelines range). Third, Ruff’s

sentence within the advisory range is presumptively reasonable, see United States v.

Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008), and we see no strong reasons that

required a non-guidelines sentence.

Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 347 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 347

     Designating May 2008 as ``National Be Bear Aware and Wildlife 
                          Stewardship Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2007

    Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Tester) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating May 2008 as ``National Be Bear Aware and Wildlife 
                          Stewardship Month''.

Whereas wildlife and wildlife viewing enrich the shared outdoor heritage of the 
        people of the United States;
Whereas it is possible to enjoy wildlife in a way that is prudent, safe, and 
        educational and that has minimal adverse effects on wildlife;
Whereas the people of the United States should be aware of the potential for 
        conflict between humans and wildlife;
Whereas the people of the United States should learn the safety and stewardship 
        techniques that can prevent such conflicts;
Whereas some groups, such as the Center for Wildlife Information and State and 
        Federal wildlife associations, in cooperation with State and Federal 
        wildlife and land management agencies, have taken important proactive 
        steps to create educations toolkits and design programs to educate 
        outdoor enthusiasts; and
Whereas educational efforts can raise awareness of the potential for such 
        conflict, help minimize such conflict, and promote the responsible 
        enjoyment of wildlife: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates May 2008 as ``National Be Bear 
Aware and Wildlife Stewardship Month''.
                                 <all>
```
### Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = LGA Operator = 0001(Exclude) Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future) 10/19/2009 11:06:00



### Query Parameters:

### 10/19/2009 11:06:00

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Operators) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

LGA
120 AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 35 ACA AIR CANADA 6 ASH MESA AIRLINES 84 AWI AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION 44 CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 30 CJC COLGAN AIRWAYS 20 COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 82 COM COMAIR AIRLINES 8 COX# BRITT dba COA EXPRESS 2 CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 81 DAL DELTA AIR LINES 101 EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 3 FFT FRONTIER AIRLINES 9 FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 15 JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 12 JIA JETSTREAM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 9 JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 18 MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 22 NKS SPIRIT AIRLINES 63 NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 128 PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 21 RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 2 SKW SKYWEST AIRLINES 15 SWA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 54 TCF SHUTTLE AMERICA 33 TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 41 UAL UNITED AIRLINES 80 USA US AIRWAYS

Page 2
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23






                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION


           We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 2-99983, 33-61091, 33-42211, and 333-42338 on Form S-8 of The
Lubrizol Corporation of our report dated February 6, 2004, (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related
to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 in 2002)
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Lubrizol
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.



    /s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
----------------------------


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 27, 2004
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 3 

To elect Robert C. Byrd, a Senator from the State of West Virginia, to 

be President pro tempore of the Senate of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To elect Robert C. Byrd, a Senator from the State of West 

Virginia, to be President pro tempore of the Senate 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved, That Robert C. Byrd, a Senator from the 

2 State of West Virginia, be, and he is hereby, elected Presi3 dent of the Senate pro tempore. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
From: "Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov>

To: Dina Kruger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/31/2011 11:59 AM

Subject: FW: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

Hi Dina – could you identify the correct person for John Hopewell to contact on this rule? 

They’re looking for a 30 day extension on this rule.

Thx

Kevin

From: John Hopewell [mailto:jhopewell@paint.org] 

Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:36 AM

To: Bromberg, Kevin L.

Cc: ccooper@ashland.com; Rostker, David J.

Subject: RE: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

Thanks, Kevin, I understand. Go figure that the staff person at EPA on it has changed and I've been in 

the process of tracking that person down since last week. 

From: Bromberg, Kevin L. [mailto:kevin.bromberg@sba.gov] 

Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:30 AM

To: John Hopewell

Cc: ccooper@ashland.com; Rostker, David J.

Subject: RE: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

We are buried here – and Dave Rostker is the contact on this one. We don’t normally join trade 

associations on letters. I do recommend first contacting the program office – I suspect an 

extension is doable. 

From: John Hopewell [mailto:jhopewell@paint.org] 

Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:48 AM

To: Bromberg, Kevin L.

Cc: ccooper@ashland.com

Subject: RE: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

Hi Kevin - I'm just following up on the below...

From: John Hopewell 

Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:38 AM

To: Bromberg, Kevin L.

Subject: LDAR requirements for ozone depleting substances

Dear Kevin,

At our Environmental Management Committee this week we discussed the attached proposed 

rule (Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak Repair 

Requirements). It appears that this is not on the radar screen of other associations and caught us 

a little by surprise. The rule is complicated and comments are due Feb 14, 2011.
Do you think there is any possibility of getting a 30-day extension to the deadline? I'd be more 

than happy to draft something that perhaps SBA and others could sign onto. Let me know 

ASAP. Thanks.

Regards,

John

John Hopewell

Asst. Director, Environmental Affairs

Coordinator, International Programs

American Coatings Association (ACA)

1500 Rhode Island Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: +1 202 462 6272

Fax: +1 202 462 8549

jhopewell@paint.org
TS-EMLA10/20/30 

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substances 

 
TS-EMLA10/20/30 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the 

New Chemical Substances – General Description
#### § 4043.1 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes the requirements for notifying PBGC of a reportable event under section 4043 of ERISA or of a failure to make certain required contributions under section 303(k)(4) of ERISA or section 430(k)(4) of the Code. Subpart A contains definitions and general rules. Subpart B contains rules for post-event notice of a reportable event. Subpart C contains rules for advance notice of a reportable event. Subpart D contains rules for notifying PBGC of a failure to make certain required contributions.