alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,273,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,491,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,620,702
<PP&E>                                       3,967,586
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,206,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,297,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,236,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       210,879
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,802,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,297,757
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,354,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,487,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,642,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                50,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,418,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   894,976
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            523,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   523,024
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Trustee
Marine Petroleum Trust:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K
of Marine Petroleum Trust of our report dated March 14, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of Tidelands Royalty Trust "B" and subsidiary as
of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income
and undistributed income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002
annual report on Form 10-K of Tidelands Royalty Trust "B".

Dallas, Texas
September 25, 2003                                      /s/ KPMG
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                                       Exhibit 99(a)
                                                                                                                       Schedule II
                 MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                          ALLOWANCE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES
                                  (In millions)

                                           Balance at                                                                     Balance at
                                            Beginning                                           Deductions                   End of
                                            of Period                  Additions              (Write-offs)                    Period
                                          -----------                 ----------              ------------               -----------
<S>                                              <C>                        <C>                       <C>                       <C>
    December 31, 1997                            $273                       $624                      $525                      $372

    December 31, 1996                             260                        572                       559                       273

    December 31, 1995                             226                        437                       403                       260
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 272 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 272

  Praising Muslim-American physicians who condemned recent attempted 
                 terrorist acts in the United Kingdom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2007

    Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Hagel) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Praising Muslim-American physicians who condemned recent attempted 
                 terrorist acts in the United Kingdom.

Whereas in early July 2007, acts of terrorism were attempted at Glasgow Airport 
        and in London;
Whereas early indications suggest that Muslim physicians allegedly were 
        responsible for the attempted acts of terrorism;
Whereas thousands of Muslim-American physicians living and practicing in the 
        United States are an important and welcome component of American 
        society;
Whereas Muslim-American physicians, through the Islamic Medical Association of 
        North America, publicly stated that the association ``condemns in the 
        strongest terms the attack on Glasgow Airport, the attempted attack in 
        London; and all attacks by which innocent people are killed or harmed in 
        any manner and all attacks that result in destruction of the property of 
        innocent people''; and
Whereas the Islamic Medical Association of North America further stated, ``Such 
        attacks, regardless of whether or not they have been perpetrated by 
        physicians, are against the most basic teachings of our religion, Islam, 
        and are contrary to the very basic principles of our profession, 
        regardless of religion or creed. Suicide is also strictly prohibited in 
        Islam.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) condemns the recent attempted attacks in the United 
        Kingdom;
            (2) commends the Islamic Medical Association of North 
        America for swift, clear, and public denunciation of the 
        attacks;
            (3) encourages Muslim voices in the United States and 
        abroad to continue speaking out against terrorism; and
            (4) condemns bigotry and acts of violence against any 
        American, including Arab-Americans and Muslim-Americans.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 13930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04798]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8208]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Portrait of Francesco I d'Este''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Portrait of Francesco I d'Este,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about April 15, 2013, until on 
or about July 14, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 22, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-04798 Filed 2-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
**Exhibit 12.2**

**MADISON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY**

**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges****Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004***(In thousands)*

****Earnings**Net Income	$ 32,184Equity earnings	(4,587)Income distribution from equity investees	3,256Federal and state income taxes	19,521Fixed charges	14,778
*Total Earnings as Defined*
$ 65,152**Fixed Charges**Interest on long-term debt	$ 11,062Other interest	273Interest on rentals*	814Amortization of debt discount	516Capitalized interest	2,113
*Total Fixed Charges*
$ 14,778Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges	4.41x**

**Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense  gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Diomed Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  May 13, 2005                       /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                             -------------------------------
### Ground-water conditions in southwestern Langlade County, Wisconsin

By: Alfred Harry HarderWilliam James Drescher

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1294

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Glacial outwash sand and gravel deposits are the principal aquifer in southwestern Langlade County, Wis. The underlying bedrock of pre-Cambrian age contains little or no water. The source of ground water is local precipitation. Information was collected on more than 300 wells in the area. Movement of ground water is generally southward and locally toward streams. Discharge is by streams and subsurface flow. Fluctuations of water levels in wells show a close correlation with seasonal precipitation and with average precipitation over a period of years. Pumping tests made at the city of Antigo's well field gave a coefficient of transmissibility of 62,000 gpd per ft and a coefficient of storage of 0.15 for the outwash deposits. It is estimated that recharge to a 90-squaremile area of the Antigo flats averages about 30,000 acre-feet per year. Of the 1,100 acrefeet pumped from wells in 1948, 69 percent was for municipal supply, 26 percent for rural supply, and 5 percent for irrigation. Use of water for irrigation has caused no measurable decline of water levels in the area as a whole. 

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 502.8 Surety bond. ( a ) H-2ALCs shall obtain a surety bond to assure compliance with the provisions of this part and 20 CFR part 655, subpart B for each labor certification being sought. The H-2ALC shall attest on the application for labor certification that such a bond meeting all the requirements of this section has been obtained and shall provide on the labor certification application form information that fully identifies the surety, including the name, address and phone number of the surety, and which identifies the bond by number or other identifying designation.
( b ) The bond shall be payable to the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor. It shall obligate the surety to pay any sums to the Administrator, WHD, for wages and benefits owed to H-2A and U.S. workers, based on a final decision finding a violation or violations of this part or 20 CFR part 655, subpart B relating to the labor certification the bond is intended to cover. The aggregate liability of the surety shall not exceed the face amount of the bond. The bond shall be written to cover liability incurred during the term of the period listed in the application for labor certification made by the H-2ALC, and shall be amended to cover any extensions of the labor certification requested by the H-2ALC. Surety bonds may not be canceled or terminated unless 30 days' notice is provided by the surety to the Administrator, WHD.
( c ) The bond shall be in the amount of $5,000 for a labor certification for which a H-2ALC will employ fewer than 25 employees, $10,000 for a labor certification for which a H-2ALC will employ 25 to 49 employees, and $20,000 for a labor certification for which a H-2ALC will employ 50 or more employees. The amount of the bond may be increased by the Administrator, WHD after notice and an opportunity for hearing when it is shown based on objective criteria that the amount of the bond is insufficient to meet potential liabilities.
#### § 779.309 Employed “in” but not “by.”

Since the exemptions by their terms apply to the employees “employed by” the exempt establishment, it follows that those exemptions will not extend to other employees who, although actually working in the establishment and even though employed by the same person who is the employer of all under section 3(d) of the Act, are not “employed by” the exempt establishment. Thus, traveling auditors, manufacturers' demonstrators, display-window arrangers, sales instructors, etc., who are not “employed by” an exempt establishment in which they work will not be exempt merely because they happen to be working in such an exempt establishment, whether or not they work for the same employer. (*Mitchell* v. *Kroger Co.,* 248 F. 2d 935 (CA-8).) For example, if the manufacturer sends one of his employees to demonstrate to the public in a customer's exempt retail establishment the products which he has manufactured, the employee will not be considered exempt under section 13(a)(2) since he is not employed by the retail establishment but by the manufacturer. The same would be true of an employee of the central offices of a chain-store organization who performs work for the central organization on the premises of an exempt retail outlet of the chain (*Mitchell* v. *Kroger Co.,* supra.)
§ 37.15 What are the Director's responsibilities to coordinate with other civil rights agencies? ( a ) Whenever a compliance review or complaint investigation under this part reveals possible violation of one or more of the laws listed in paragraph (b) of this section, or of any other Federal civil rights law, that is not also a violation of the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIA or this part, the Director must attempt to notify the appropriate agency and provide it with all relevant documents and information.
( b ) This section applies to the following: ( 1 ) Executive Order 11246, as amended;
( 2 ) Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 793);
( 3 ) The affirmative action provisions of the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as amended (38 U.S.C. 4212);
( 4 ) The Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended (29 U.S.C. 206d);
( 5 ) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*);
( 6 ) The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended (29 U.S.C. 621);
( 7 ) The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. 12101 *et seq.*);
( 8 ) The anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1324b); and
( 9 ) Any other Federal civil rights law.
###### Editorial Note on Part 6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 6.45 Petition for review.

Within 30 days after the date of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, any party aggrieved thereby who desires review thereof shall file a petition for review of the decision with supporting reasons. Such party shall transmit the petition in writing to the Administrative Review Board pursuant to 29 CFR part 8 if the proceeding was under the Service Contract Act, or to the Administrative Review Board pursuant to 29 CFR part 7 if the proceeding was under § 5.12(a)(1) of part 5 of this title or under section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act, with a copy thereof to the Chief Administrative Law Judge. The petition for review shall refer to the specific findings of fact, conclusions of law, or order at issue.
#### Richmond Railway & Electric Co. *v.*Harris.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Feb. 2, 1899.)*

[32 S. E. Rep. 458.]

Contract to Build Railroad — Liability to Subcontractor — Extras.

A railroad company which has let a contract for the construction and equipment of its road is not liable to a subcontractor for extra work done by him in constructing it under his contract with the principal contractor.

Appeal from Chancery court of Richmond.

Bill by one Harris against the Richmond Railway *&*Electric Company. There was a decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

Reversed.

*Wyndham B. Meredith*and *Christian &*Christian, for appellant.

*James Lyons*and *Hill*Montague, for appellee.

Harrison, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Richmond Railway & Electric Company, as successor to the Union Passenger Railway Company, having assumed the debts of the last-named company, this proceeding was instituted by the appellee to recover of the first-named company a balance claimed to be due him for extra work done in the construction of the Union Passenger Railway.

*647It appears from the record that the Union Passenger Railway Company made a contract with the firm of Guy C. Hotchkiss, Field & Co., as general contractors, to build and equip for it a certain street railway partly in the city of Richmond and partly in the county of Henrico. It further appears that Guy C. Hotchkiss, Field & Co. made a contract with the appellee, Harris, as subcontractor, to do the work of construction of the contemplated railway. The claim now set up by Harris against the Richmond Railway & Electric Company is for extra work done by him under his contract with Guy C. Hotchkiss, Field & Co. It clearly appears that there was no contractual relation, either express or implied, between Harris and the railway company. His contract was with Guy C. Hotchkiss, Field & Co., and to them alone can he look for settlement of what may be due under his contract with them. Harris was in no sense a creditor of the railway company, and *therefore*had no standing in court to maintain the proceeding he has instituted. It is not, as contended, a case for putting the saddle on the right horse. Guy C. Hotchkiss, Field & Co. are not parties to this proceeding, and, for aught that appears to the contrary, the railway company may have settled in full with them for all irregular as well as all regular work done under their contract to build and equip the road.

For these reasons the decree appealed from must be *reversed,*and a decree entered dismissing the petition filed by the appellee in the court below.

Buchanan and Caedwell, JJ., absent.