alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

Calendar No. 729 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 537 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 

the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 

enforcement officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2008 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

KOHL, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, 

Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, 

Mr. BAUCUS, and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 8, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have lost their 

lives while serving as law enforcement officers. 

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is 

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance 

and dedication of law enforcement personnel; 

Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk 

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of the peace; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

SRES 537 RS 

Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in protecting the 

schools and schoolchildren of the United States; 

Whereas 181 peace officers across the United States were 

killed in the line of duty during 2007, tragically the highest yearly total since 2001; 

Whereas Congress should strongly support initiatives to reduce violent crime and to increase the factors that contribute to the safety of law enforcement officers, including— 

(1) better equipment and increased use of bullet-resistant vests; 

(2) improved training; and 

(3) advanced emergency medical care; 

Whereas, every 2 days on average, 1 out of every 16 peace 

officers is assaulted, 1 out of every 56 peace officers is 

injured, and 1 out of every 5,500 peace officers is killed 

in the line of duty somewhere in the United States; and 

Whereas, on May 15, 2008, more than 20,000 peace officers 

are expected to gather in Washington, District of Columbia, to join with the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went 

before them: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes May 15, 2008, as ‘‘Peace Offi3 cers Memorial Day’’, in honor of the Federal, State, 

4 and local law enforcement officers that have been 

5 killed or disabled in the line of duty; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

SRES 537 RS 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe that day with appropriate ceremonies, appre3 ciation, and respect. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Calendar No. 729 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 537 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication 

ment officers. have lost their lives while serving as law enforceand sacrifice made by the men and women who 

MAY 8, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 104.405 Format of the Vessel Security Plan (VSP). ( a ) A vessel owner or operator must ensure that the VSP consists of the individual sections listed in this paragraph (a). If the VSP does not follow the order as it appears in the list, the vessel owner or operator must ensure that the VSP contains an index identifying the location of each of the following sections: ( 1 ) Security organization of the vessel;
( 2 ) Personnel training;
( 3 ) Drills and exercises;
( 4 ) Records and documentation;
( 5 ) Response to change in MARSEC Level;
( 6 ) Procedures for interfacing with facilities and other vessels;
( 7 ) Declarations of Security (DoS);
( 8 ) Communications;
( 9 ) Security systems and equipment maintenance;
( 10 ) Security measures for access control, including the vessel's TWIC Program, designated passenger access areas and employee access areas;
( 11 ) Security measures for restricted areas;
( 12 ) Security measures for handling cargo;
( 13 ) Security measures for delivery of vessel stores and bunkers;
( 14 ) Security measures for monitoring;
( 15 ) Security incident procedures;
( 16 ) Audits and Vessel Security Plan (VSP) amendments; and
( 17 ) Vessel Security Assessment (VSA) Report.
( b ) The VSP must describe in detail how the requirements of subpart B of this part will be met.
[USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39302, July 1, 2003, as amended by USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 3582, Jan. 25, 2007; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57711, Aug. 23, 2016]
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ESTATE OF DAVID RUBI NSTEIN, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 5068

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:09

- cv

- 00291

- MMS, Judge Margaret M. Sweeney.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OSEPH A. B ROYLES , The Law Offices of Joseph A. Broyles, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff

appellant.

M ELISSA B RIGGS , Tax Division, United States D epartment of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defen dant

- appellee. Also represented by J ONATHAN S. C OH EN , C AROLINE D. C IRAOLO

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R EYNA , H UGHES , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 10, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40465

Summary Calendar

ERIC ANTONIO HOWARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES C. BAILEY, in his official

capacity as District Attorney for

the 76th Judicial District, ET AL.,

Defendants,

KENNETH SPARKS, in his official

capacity as Lieutenant in the Mt. Pleasant

City Police Department; JIM BAYUK, in

his official capacity as Agent DPS/TNT

Task Force,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(2:93-CV-99)

December 6, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and PARKER, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*
1Burroughs v. FFP Operating Partner, L.P., 70 F.3d 31 (5th Cir. 1995).

2Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1982).

2

Eric Antonio Howard appeals an adverse summary judgment entered after

partial affirmance and partial remand of his earlier appeal. Our review of the

record and briefs discloses neither error nor abuse of discretion in the judgment on

remand and, accordingly, we affirm, essentially on the basis of the facts as found,

authorities cited, and analysis in the careful and thorough Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed April 4, 1996, which was

approved and adopted by the district court by its order filed on April 30, 1996.

Howard’s attempt to challenge the denial of appointment of counsel prior to

the first appeal is beyond the scope of today’sreview.1 His request for appointment

of counsel herein is denied.2 His suggestion that he should have been allowed

further discovery before the trial court ruled on the summary judgment motions

lacks factual basis and is frivolous.

The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Central Montana Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Central Montana Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Stanford, Montana. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose is to hold the first meeting of the newly formed committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held August 31, 2011 and will begin at 7 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Judith Ranger District, 
located at 109 Central Avenue, Stanford, MT. Written comments should be 
sent to Ron Wiseman, Lewis and Clark National Forest, 109 Central 
Avenue, Stanford, Montana 59479. Comments may also be sent via e-mail 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e3c39273d2b232f200e283d60282b2a603b3d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d6f6a746e78707c735d7b6e337b787933686e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Lewis and Clark 
National Forest, 109 Central Avenue, Stanford, Montana 59479. Visitors 
are encouraged to call ahead to (406) 566-2292 to facilitate entry into 
the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Wiseman, Designated Federal 
Official, USDA, Lewis and Clark National Forest, 109 Central Avenue, 
Stanford, MT 59479; (406) 566-2292; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1a3a6b8a2b4bcb0bf91b7a2ffb7b4b5ffa4a2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a080d13091f171b143a1c09541c1f1e540f09">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Review of project proposals 
(2) Final recommendation of project propsals; (3) Public Comment. 
Persons who wish to bring related matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting.

    Dated: August 4, 2011.
Ron B. Wiseman,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20358 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TRUTH SHYDEE WILSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 307 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 918 WDA 

2019 entered on September 10, 

2020, affirming the Judgment of 

Sentence of the Allegheny County 

Court of Common Pleas at No. CP02-CR-0004689-2018 entered on 

May 22, 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED

to the Superior Court for consideration in light of Commonwealth v. Raboin, 258 A.3d 412 

(Pa. 2021). The Superior Court is further directed to address whether the forensic 

interview was admissible under the tender years exception to the hearsay rule.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 429 

Honoring the brave men and women of the United States Coast Guard 

whose tireless work, dedication, and commitment to protecting the United 

States have led to the confiscation of over 350,000 pounds of cocaine 

at sea during 2007. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2008 

Mrs. DOLE (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. BURR, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. 

SNOWE, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. DODD) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the brave men and women of the United States 

Coast Guard whose tireless work, dedication, and commitment to protecting the United States have led to 

the confiscation of over 350,000 pounds of cocaine at 

sea during 2007. 

Whereas the estimated import value of the 350,000 pounds 

of cocaine confiscated by the United States Coast Guard 

in 2007 is more than $4,700,000,000, or nearly 1⁄2 of the 

Coast Guard’s annual budget; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

SRES 429 ATS 

Whereas the Coast Guard’s at-sea drug interdictions are 

making a difference in the lives of United States citizens, 

as evidenced by the reduced supply of cocaine in more 

than 35 major cities throughout the United States; 

Whereas keeping illegal drugs from reaching our shores, 

where they undermine American values and threaten 

families, schools, and communities, continues to be an 

important national priority; 

Whereas, through robust interagency teamwork, collaboration 

with international partners, and ever more effective tools 

and tactics, the Coast Guard has removed more than 

2,000,000 pounds of cocaine during the past 10 years 

and will continue to tighten the web of detection and 

interdiction at sea; and 

Whereas the men and women of the Coast Guard who, while 

away from family and hundreds of miles from our shores, 

execute this dangerous mission, as well as other vital 

maritime safety, security, and environmental protection 

missions, with quiet dedication and without need of public recognition, continue to display selfless service in protecting the Nation and the American people: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the United States Coast Guard, with 

3 its proud 217-year legacy of maritime law enforce4 ment and border protection, along with the brave 

5 men and women whose efforts clearly demonstrate 

6 the honor, respect, and devotion to duty that ensure 

7 the parents of the United States can sleep soundly 

8 knowing the Coast Guard is on patrol; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

SRES 429 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the tireless work, dedication, and 

2 commitment that have allowed the Coast Guard to 

3 confiscate over 350,000 pounds of cocaine at sea in 

4 2007. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 110.29 Boston Inner Harbor, Mass. ( a ) *Vicinity of Pleasant Park Yacht Club, Winthrop.* Southerly of a line bearing 276° from a point on the west side of Pleasant Street, Winthrop, 360 feet from the southwest corner of its intersection with Main Street; westerly of a line bearing 186° from a point on the south side of Main Street 140 feet from the southwest corner of its intersection with Pleasant Street; northerly of a line bearing 256° from a point on the west side of Pleasant Street 550 feet from the southwest corner of its intersection with Main Street and easterly of a line bearing 182° from a point on the south side of Main Street 640 feet from the southwest corner of its intersection with Pleasant Street.
( b ) *Mystic River, east side of Tobin Bridge.* Beginning at a line running from a point on the Tobin Bridge at latitude 42°23′08.5′′ N. 071°02′48.2′′ W. to a point at latitude 42°23′06.4′′ N. 071°02′43.7′′ W.; thence northwest to a point at latitude 42°23′09.1′′ N. 071°02′43.2′′ W. along the shoreline to the western side of Tobin Bridge, thence to the point of origin.
( c ) *Mystic River, west side of Tobin Bridge.* Beginning at a line running from a point on the Tobin Bridge at latitude 42°23′08.8′′ N. 071°02′48.6′′ W. to a point at latitude 42°23′10.5′′ N. 071°05′52′′ W.; thence northwest to the southeasterly corner of the pier at latitude 42°23′13.4′′ N. 071°02′57.1′′ W. along the pier to the shoreline to the eastern side of Tobin Bridge, thence to the point of origin.
( d ) *Boston Inner Harbor A.* The waters of the western side of Boston Inner Harbor north of the entrance to the Fort Point Channel bound by the following points beginning at latitude 42°21′32′′ N., longitude 071°02′50′′ W; thence to latitude 42°21′33′′ N., longitude 071°02′44′′ W.; thence to latitude 42°21′26′′ N., longitude 071°02′36′′ W.; thence to latitude 42°21′26′′ N., longitude 071°02′53′′ W.; thence to point of origin. [NAD83].
[USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27439, June 10, 2009, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.333 Suwannee River.

The draw of Suwannee River bridge, mile 35 at Old Town need not be opened for the passage of vessels, however, the draw shall be restored to operable condition within 6 months after notification by the District Commander to do so.

[CGD07-98-054, 64 FR 55419, Oct. 13, 1999]
Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission

No. 7241

#### City of Concord v. New Hampshire Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission

July 31, 1975

*Paul F. Cavanaugh,*city solicitor, by brief and orally, for the city of Concord.

*Warren B. Rudman,*attorney general, and *Donald W. Stever, Jr.,*assistant attorney general *(Mr. Stever*orally), for the State.

Per curiam.

The city of Concord has pending an appeal under RSA 541:6 (Supp. 1974) from an order of the water supply *454and pollution control commission requiring the city to cover a water supply open distribution reservoir. After hearing, the commission on April 22, 1975, ordered the city to inform the commission not later than May 28, 1975, that it had adopted a program to cover the reservoir, appropriated funds for the program, and established a timetable for completing the improvements. A motion for rehearing was denied May 29, 1975, and the time for compliance with the order was changed to “forthwith”.

The present proceeding concerns the motion of the city to suspend the order of the commission pending the determination of its appeal. While the presumptions favor the order of the commission, the city represents that the quality of the water delivered from the reservoir will be monitored pending hearing on the merits, and that any timetable for completion of the improvement will not be materially affected by suspension through the month of August.

The motion of the city is granted with the following limitations. The appeal of the city is assigned for oral argument at 10 a.m., September 3, 1975, and the order of the commission is suspended until that date. Provided the appeal is heard on that date, the order of the commission is suspended until further order of the court.

*So ordered.*

Grimes, J., did not sit.
Exhibit (32)(b)

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Gregory A. Smith, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 23, 2007.



/s/ Gregory A. SmithGregory A. SmithSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarshall & Ilsley Corporation


This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 371 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 371

  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the issuance of State 
 driver's licenses and other government-issued photo identification to 
                            illegal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 2007

   Mr. Coleman (for himself, Mrs. Dole, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Lott, Mr. 
  Isakson, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
Vitter, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Burr, Mr. Bond, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Coburn, Mr. 
Graham, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Allard, and Mr. Corker) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the issuance of State 
 driver's licenses and other government-issued photo identification to 
                            illegal aliens.

Whereas some States issue State driver's licenses to aliens who are unlawfully 
        present in the United States;
Whereas by providing official government-issued identification to individuals 
        who are in the United States illegally, States and other government 
        entities reward those who show disrespect and disregard for Federal 
        immigration laws;
Whereas the very act of entering the United States illegally shows disrespect 
        for the laws of the United States and should not be rewarded in any way; 
        and
Whereas issuing driver's licenses to undocumented individuals presents a 
        national security risk and enables election fraud: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that States should not 
issue driver's licenses or other photo identification to aliens who are 
unlawfully present in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 116
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 116 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35012, June 19, 2008 and USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 49410, Aug. 13, 2010.

§ 116.35 Order to Alter. ( a ) If the bridge owner agrees with the contents of the 60-Day Letter, if no reply is received by 60 days after the issuance of the letter, or if after reevaluation a bridge is determined to be an unreasonable obstruction to navigation, the Commandant will issue an Order to Alter. ( 1 ) If a bridge is eligible for funding under the Truman-Hobbs Act, the Order to Alter will specify the navigational clearances to be accomplished in order to meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
( 2 ) An Order to Alter for a bridge that is not eligible for Truman-Hobbs funding will specify the navigational clearances that are required to meet the reasonable needs of navigation and will prescribe a reasonable time in which to accomplish them.
( b ) If appropriate, the Order to Alter will be accompanied by a letter of special conditions setting forth safeguards needed to protect the environment or to provide for any special needs of navigation.
( c ) If a proposed alteration to a bridge has desirable, non-navigational benefits, the Chief, Office of Bridge Programs may require an equitable contribution from any interested person, firm, association, corporation, municipality, county, or state benefiting from the alteration as a prerequisite to the making of an Order to Alter for that alteration.
( d ) Failure to comply with any Order to Alter issued under the provisions of this part will subject the owner or controller of the bridge to the penalties prescribed in 33 U.S.C. 495, 502, 519, or any other applicable provision.
[CGD 91-063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33664, June 28, 1996; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39174, July 1, 2013]