alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certificate of Limited Partnership for MDS Energy Public 2012-A LP



 Exhibit 4.1 

CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 FOR 
 MDS ENERGY PUBLIC 2012-A LP 







 State of Delaware 

Secretary of State 
 Division of Corporations 
 Delivered 02:26 PM 05/01/2012 

FILED 02:26 PM 05/01/2012 
 SRV 120495075—5148280 FILE 
 STATE OF DELAWARE 

CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
  

	 	•	 	 The Undersigned, desiring to form a limited partnership pursuant to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Delaware Code,
Chapter 17, do hereby certify as follows: 


  

	 	•	 	 First: The name of the limited partnership is MDS Energy Public 2012-A LP. 



 

	 	•	 	 Second: The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is 1220 North Market Street, Suite 806 in the city of Wilmington. Zip code
19801. The name of the Registered Agent at such address is Registered Agents Legal Services, LLC. 


  

	 	•	 	 Third: The name and mailing address of each general partners is as follows: 



 

	
	MDS Energy Development,
LLC
	409 Butler Road, Suite A
	Kittanning, PA 16201

 In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Limited
Partnership as of the 1st day of May, A.D. 2012.

  

			
	MDS Energy Development, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael D. Snyder

General Partner(s)





			
		
	Name:	 	 Michael D. Snyder.

		 	 Print or Type
 Authorized Person of Managing General Partner
##### 



ADC Telecommunications
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Instructions to Paragraph 503(d)  SEC Handbook
 Fiscal Year Ended October 312005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001EarningsIncome (loss) before income taxes
    
    $
    92.7
    
    
    $
    35.6
    
    
    $
    (44.9
    )
    
    $
    (728.0
    )
    
    $
    (1,728.6
    )ADD+
Adjustment for minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries or income or loss
from equity investees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2.6
    
    
    
    9.7+ Fixed Charges
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    14.7
    
    
    
    7.2
    
    
    
    9.7
    
    
    
    16.2+ Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    +
ADCs share of pre-tax losses of equity investees for which
charges arising from guarantees are included in fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Sub-total
    
    
    107.7
    
    
    
    50.3
    
    
    
    (37.7
    )
    
    
    (715.7
    )
    
    
    (1,702.7
    )SUBTRACT- Interest Capitalized
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    - Preference
security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    - Minority interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not
incurred fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Sub-total
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Earnings
    
    $
    107.7
    
    
    $
    50.3
    
    
    $
    (37.7
    )
    
    $
    (715.7
    )
    
    $
    (1,702.7
    )Fixed ChargesInterest Expensed
    
    $
    11.2
    
    
    $
    8.8
    
    
    $
    3.6
    
    
    $
    2.4
    
    
    $
    8.8Interest Capitalized
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Amortized
premiums, discounts & capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    0.6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest Within Rental Expense
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    4.3
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    7.3
    
    
    
    7.4Preference Security Dividend Requirements
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    15.0
    
    
    $
    14.7
    
    
    $
    7.2
    
    
    $
    9.7
    
    
    $
    16.2Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    7.2
    x
    
    
    3.4
    x
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Deficiency of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    44.9
    
    
    $
    725.4
    
    
    $
    1,718.9
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 393 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 393

   Expressing the condolences of the Senate to those affected by the 
    tragic events of December 5, 2007, at Westroads Mall in Omaha, 
                               Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 2007

   Mr. Nelson of Nebraska (for himself and Mr. Hagel) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the condolences of the Senate to those affected by the 
    tragic events of December 5, 2007, at Westroads Mall in Omaha, 
                               Nebraska.

Whereas, on Wednesday, December 5, 2007, the worst mass slaying in Nebraska 
        history occurred at Westroads Mall in Omaha;
Whereas lives were tragically lost, and others were wounded;
Whereas the brave men and women of the Omaha Police Department, Fire Department, 
        and other emergency responders acted valiantly to save lives;
Whereas the people of Omaha have embraced those affected and will continue to 
        offer support to their neighbors who have suffered from this tragedy; 
        and
Whereas the community of Omaha will endure the aftereffects of this tragedy to 
        emerge stronger than it was before: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) expresses its heartfelt condolences to the friends and 
        families of those who lost their lives in the tragic shooting 
        on December 5, 2007, at Westroads Mall in Omaha, Nebraska: Gary 
        Sharf of Lincoln, Nebraska, John McDonald of Council Bluffs, 
        Iowa, and Angie Schuster, Maggie Webb, Janet Jorgensen, Diane 
        Trent, Gary Joy, and Beverly Flynn, all of Omaha;
            (2) shares its prayers and best wishes for recovery to 
        those who were wounded;
            (3) extends its thanks to the first responders, police, and 
        medical personnel who responded so quickly and decisively to 
        provide aid and comfort to the victims; and
            (4) stands with the people of Omaha as they begin the 
        healing process in the aftermath of this terrible attack.
                                 <all>
```
§ 4068.3 Notification of and demand for liability. ( a ) *Notification of liability.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, when the PBGC has determined the amount of the liability under part 4062 and whether or not the liability has already been paid, the PBGC shall notify liable person(s) in writing of the amount of the liability. If the full liability has not yet been paid, the notification will include a request for payment of the full liability and will indicate that, as provided in § 4062.8, the PBGC will prescribe commercially reasonable terms for payment of so much of the liability as it determines exceeds 30 percent of the collective net worth of persons subject to liability in connection with a plan termination. In all cases, the notification will include a statement of the right to appeal the assessment of liability pursuant to part 4003.
( b ) *Demand for liability.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, if person(s) liable to the PBGC fail to pay the full liability and no appeal is filed or an appeal is filed and the decision on appeal finds liability, the PBGC will issue a demand letter for the liability— ( 1 ) If no appeal is filed, upon the expiration of time to file an appeal under part 4003; or
( 2 ) If an appeal is filed, upon issuance of a decision on the appeal finding that there is liability under this part. The demand letter will indicate that, as provided in § 4062.8, the PBGC will prescribe commercially reasonable terms for payment of so much of the liability as it determines exceeds 30 percent of the collective net worth of such persons.
( c ) *Special rule.* Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the PBGC may, in any case in which it believes that its ability to assert or obtain payment of liability is in jeopardy, issue a demand letter for the liability under this part immediately upon determining the liability, without first issuing a notification of liability pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. When the PBGC issues a demand letter under this paragraph, there is no right to an appeal pursuant to part 4003 of this chapter.
§ 4902.6 Action on request for amendment of a record. ( a ) Within 20 working days after receipt by the PBGC of a request for amendment of a record under § 4902.5, unless for good cause shown the Director of the PBGC extends such 20-day period, the disclosure officer shall notify the requester in writing whether and to what extent the request shall be granted. To the extent that the request is granted, the disclosure officer shall cause the requested amendment to be made promptly.
( b ) When a request for amendment of a record is denied in whole or in part, the denial shall include a statement of the reasons therefor, the procedures for appealing such denial, and a notice that the requester has a right to assistance in preparing an appeal of the denial.
( c ) An individual who desires assistance in preparing an appeal of a denial under this section shall submit a request to the Deputy General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The Deputy General Counsel shall respond to the request as promptly as possible, but in no event more than 30 days after receipt.
[61 FR 34128, July 1, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 61359, Oct. 28, 2003; 74 FR 27082, June 8, 2009]
Date: Jlmyd_a} 9/ g' cJ:; sprn . 

Meeting: Ml»t ll\r-tfll1 p lJ ~ 

Rule(s)Discussed: RPS zott(-ffP ~b~ / cdiv(~l c__ ~C/ ~~ 

Written Materials? Y ~ 

Name Organization Phone Number 

, JJe 1/1.- !I.e 11 q > f- EF'It (02- 50 '-1- !L(<i.s,._ 

"' 

l<~ \e (J i \\o. ~ ?o£\ (v()C) - q;q - 3~ z. z.. l c I l)uvt ./-.c;fl-t n. 1 .,;-c., r f/D!/- DJM bOS- ?.,f-~- ?_of-? 

Jt=rs:= L.;t. ....... r"t- PoG"T &iJs-- c, (., )- 2_'2.0 () 

fl-., 0 S Yl-T L./,'- ._ 11+-SJL po£1 2 0 2 - 7 '-/ '-1 • I ) 0 s-' 

-rc 7'G_ iL ~ J:..-nA ) ~e.v.ow'l~ 7LJ2- /,?~- ~/// """' ._. 

u_t;_ !?{)A/JJL~ 

~· .15 C)!<,/£ tfcJ (_ .b ~ 

c M 11-c!l; t::.~ e-

;-;--

·. JAAif' r M( (/I&G'
EXHIBIT 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 2-79563) pertaining to the Incentive Stock Option Plan of Lumex, Inc.
dated September 29, 1982, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-46109)
pertaining to the Charles E. Murcott 1982 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-46110) pertaining to the Lumex, Inc. 1987 Stock
Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-48124) pertaining to
the Lumex, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-59947) pertaining to the Lumex, Inc. 1995 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-59945) pertaining to the Lumex, Inc.
1995 Stock Retainer Plan for Nonemployee Directors of our report dated March 6,
1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CYBEX
International, Inc. (formerly Lumex, Inc.) included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Melville, New York
April 23, 1997
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

Kurt D. Saliger
Certified Public Accountant
5000 West Oakey
Suite A-4
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

February 22, 2000

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: COMBINED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., FORM 10Q-SB

Dear Sir or Madam:

        As a Certified Public Accountant, I hereby consent to the inclusion of
my report dated October 29, 1999, in the Form 10Q-SB filed by Combined
Professional Services, Inc., including all references to my reports to the
extend they are concurrent therewith and contained in the Form 10Q-SB.

By: /s/ KURT D. SALIGER
   -----------------------------------
    Kurt D. Saliger, C.P.A.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H on orabl e M i rand a D u, D i stri ctJudg e f or the U . S . D i stri ctC ou rt ** f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AC HMAD KA R I M a n dF NU E R T A, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70951 A ge nc yN os . A 075- 763- 795

A 075- 763- 796 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d J une 7, 2013 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: G O U L D and N . R . S M IT H , C i rc ui tJudg es , and D U , D i stri ctJudg e. ** A chm ad K ar i m and F nu E rt a pet i t i on for r evi ew of the deci si on by the B oard o f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s (B IA ) d en yi n g th ei r m o t i o n t o reo p en as u n t i m el y b ecau se 

# FI LED JU N 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

P e titio n e r s f

a ile dto e s tab lis h m a te r ia llyc h a n g e dc o u n tryc o n d itio n s in I n d o n e s ia . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 , a n dw e g r a n t th e p e titio n . P e titio n e r s s u b m itte d , a m o n g o th e rd o c u m e n ts , ad e c la r a tio n f r o m K a r im in s upportof

the i rm ot i on t o r e ope n. T he B I A di d nota c know l e dge the de c l a r a t i on, n o rd idit a d d r e s s th e f

a c ts c o n ta in e dth e r e in . W h ile th e B I A d o e s n o t n e e dto

“ di s c us s e a c h pi e c e of

e vi de nc e s ubm i tt e d, ” “ w he r e the r e i s a nyi ndi c a t i on tha tthe B IA di d n otconsi der a l l of the evi dence before i t , . . . the deci si on cann otst and. ” C ol e v . H

older , 65 9 F . 3d 76 2, 77 1-72 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). H er e, because the B IA f a ile dto e v e n a c k n o w le d g e th e d e c la r a tio n , it is n o t p o s s ib le to c o n c lu s iv e ly de t e rm i ne w he the rthe B I A c ons i de r e d thi s i nf orm a t i on. T he r e f

or e , w e gr a ntthe p e titio n f o rr e v ie w a n dr e m a n df o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s f

o rth e B I A to s p e c if

ic a lly a d d r e s s th e e v id e n c e r a is e din th e d e c la r a tio n . See Franco–R osendo v. G on zales , 4 5 4 F .3 d9 6 5 , 9 6 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( “T h e B I A ab u s e s its d is c r e tio n w h e n it f a ils to c o n s id e ra n da d d r e s s in its e n tir e tyth e e v id e n c e s u b m itte db yap e titio n e ra n dto is s u e ad e c is io n th a t f

u llye x p la in s th e r e a s o n s f o rd e n y in g am o tio n to r e o p e n .” ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20409]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Modification Issued Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 2011, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on August 8, 2011 to: James 
G. Bockheim; Permit No. 2012-004.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20409 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010. 2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

§ 1.07-45 Location of hearings and change of venue. ( a ) The hearing is normally held at the office of the Hearing Officer.
( b ) The Hearing Officer may transfer a case to another Hearing Officer on request or on the Hearing Officer's own motion.
( c ) A request for change of location of a hearing or transfer to another Hearing Officer must be in writing and state the reasons why the requested action is necessary or desirable. Action on the request is at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.
[CGD 87-008a, 52 FR 17554, May 11, 1987]
§ 779.412 Compensation requirements for overtime pay exemption under section 7(i). An employee of a “retail or service establishment” who is paid on a commission basis or whose pay includes compensation representing commissions need not be paid the premium compensation prescribed by section 7(a) for overtime hours worked in a workweek, provided the following conditions are met: ( a ) The “regular rate” of pay of such employee must be more than one and one-half times the minimum hourly rate applicable to him under section 6, and
( b ) More than half his compensation for a “representative period” (not less than one month) must represent commissions on goods or services.
(80 South. 133)

#### MAHONEY v. STATE. PREISS v. SAME.

(3 Div. 316, 320.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 26, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; A. B. Poster, Judge.

Ed Mahoney and George Preiss separately appeal from an adverse 'ruling in prosecutions against them.

Reversed and remanded.

Goodwyn & McIntyre, of Montgomery, for appellants.

P. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Kreutner v. State, 80 South. 125, necessitates a reversal of the judgment in this case.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                            269,194
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,698,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                      313,882
<INVENTORY>                                    24,614,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,286,375
<PP&E>                                          1,063,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                    538,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,811,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,599,032
<BONDS>                                        25,085,423
<COMMON>                                           88,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,038,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,811,517
<SALES>                                        13,194,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,247,174
<CGS>                                          10,082,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,412,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                710,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,834,319
<INCOME-TAX>                                      738,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,095,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,095,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.23
        








</TABLE>
#### § 94.630 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a Federal agency to prohibit a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions. A recipient so prohibited is debarred, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and the common rule, Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), that implements Executive Order 12549 and Executive Order 12689.
## ESA - Lis te d P acific NW and California Anadr omous Salmonids 28 E volutionarily Significant Units

Coho Oncorh ynchus kisutch Chum Oncorh ynchus k

eta Sock eye Oncorh ynchus nerk

a St eelhead Oncorh ynchus m ykiss Chinook Oncorh ynchus tshawytscha

## Fe der al Action “A uthoriz ation for use or uses described in labeling of a pes ticide pr oduct con ta ining a particular pes ticide activ e ingr edien t.” Definition r eached at NMFS - USFWS - USEP A meeting 12/12/2007Metabolites of active ingr edients Re gistr ation and uses of pesticide labels containing the active ingr edients (a.i.) 

## Str essor s

Label - re commended t ank mixtur es Degr adat es of active ingr edients

Adjuvants/surfact ants added to fo rmulations Other ingr edients in formulationsWe use an ec ological risk fr amework to assess effects of pes ticides to listed species

Can EP A insure that pesticide actions are not lik ely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species? Can EP A insure that pesticide actions are not lik ely to adversely modify or destroy designated critical habitat?

# NMF S In fo rma tion r eques t:

• Curr en t labels • Curr en t and pending 24cs (in CA, ID , OR, WA) • Curr en t and pending 18s (in CA, ID , OR, WA)

• Exis ting s to ck s of canceled pr oducts • Aquatic tox icity s tudies y ou wo uld lik e us t o c onsider