alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 110.209 Saint Lawrence Seaway Anchorages, New York. ( a ) *Carleton Island Anchorage; Saint Lawrence River, Cape Vincent, New York* — ( 1 ) *Carleton Island Anchorage Area.* The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points, beginning at 44°11′57.11′′ N, 076°14′04.62′′ W; thence to 44°11′21.80′′ N, 076°14′05.77′′ W; thence to 44°11′34.07′′ N, 076°15′49.57′′ W; 44°11′35.35′′ N, 076°16′47.50′′ W; 44°11′43.49′′ N, 076°16′48.00′′ W; 44°11′57.11′′ N, 076°14′04.62′′ W and back to the beginning point. These coordinates are based on WGS 84.
( 2 ) *Tibbett's Island Anchorage Area.* The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points, beginning at 44°05′20.27′′ N, 076°23′25.78′′ W; thence to 44°05′21.85′′ N, 076°22′40.97′′ W; thence to 44°04′34.08′′ N, 076°23′09.98′′ W; 44°04′07.72′′ N, 076°23′33.76′′ W; 44°04′32.78′′ N, 076°24′43.80′′ W; 44°05′44.37′′ N, 076°23′56.29′′ W; 44°05′20.27′′ N, 076°23′25.78′′ W and back to the beginning point. These coordinates are based on WGS 84.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Anchors must not be placed in the Saint Lawrence Seaway shipping channel. No portion of the hull or rigging may extend outside the limits of the anchorage area.
( 2 ) No vessel may occupy any general anchorage described in paragraph (a) of this section for a period longer than 10 days unless approval is obtained from the Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) for that purpose.
( 3 ) The COTP, or authorized representative, may require vessels to depart from the Anchorages described in paragraph (a) of this section before the expiration of the authorized or maximum stay. The COTP, or authorized representative, will provide at least 12-hour notice to a vessel required to depart the anchorages.
[USCG-2017-1125, 83 FR 30345, June 28, 2018]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Genomic Applications for Heart, Lung and 
Blood Research (PGA).
    Date: June 19-20, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Baltimore, On the Inner Harbor, 300 Light 
Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.
    Contact Person: Valerie L. Prenger, PhD, Health Science 
Administrator, NIH, NHLBI, DEA, Review Branch, Rockledge Center II, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 7198, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 
435-0297.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Programs of Excellence in Gene Therapy.
    Date: July 8-10, 2000.
    Time: 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Columbia Hotel, 10207 Wincopin Circle, Columbia, 
MD 21044.
    Contact Person: Terry Rogers Bishop, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NIH, NHLBI, DEA, Rockledge Center II, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 7210, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 
435-0303.
    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Positional Candidate Gene Approaches in 
Asthma Gene Discovery.
    Date: July 10, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Valerie L. Prenger, PhD, Health Science 
Administrator, NIH, NHLBI, DEA, Review Branch, Rockledge Center II, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 7198, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 
435-0297.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Disease and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)
    Dated: May 18, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13274 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 50714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20778]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 42

[FAR Case 2009-042; Docket 2011-0087, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM09

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Documenting Contractor 
Performance; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the comment date published in the 
Federal Register of August 9, 2011, regarding the proposed rule for 
Documenting Contractor Performance.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published June, 28, 
2011, at 76 FR 37704, is extended. Comments will be received until 
September 29, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement 
Analyst, at (202) 501-1448. Please cite FAR Case 2009-042.

Correction

    In the proposed rule FR Doc. 2011-20089, beginning on page 48776, 
in the 2nd column, in the issue of August 9, 2011, make the following 
correction, in the DATES section:
    Remove ``September 8, 2011'' and add ``September 29, 2011'' in its 
place.

Hada Flowers,
Division Director, Regulatory Secretariat, Office of Governmentwide 
Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-20778 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
```
Exhibit 32.1



                         Section 1350 Certification
                         --------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form 10-Q of the MLM Index Fund pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

        The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the MLM Index Fund.


May 14, 2004


/s/ Timothy J. Rudderow
-------------------------------------------
President
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund
#### § 105.540 Screener participation in drills and exercises.

Screening personnel must participate in drills and exercises required under § 105.220.
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Dan W. Gladney, Chief Executive Officer of Compex Technologies, Inc.,certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CompexTechnologies, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this report fairly present, in all materialrespects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofCompex Technologies, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 28, 2004                                                    /s/ Dan W. Gladney   Signature   Name:  Dan W. Gladney  Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### Conwell *v.*Overmeyer.

[No. 17,803.

Filed June 19, 1896.]

From the Cass Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

*Magee*& *Funk,*for appellant.

*C. C. Bishop, G. W. Walters, W. A. Ketcham,*Attorney-General, *E. F. Ritter, F. E. Matson, C. E. Wiltsie,*and *Duncan, Smith & Hornbrook,*for appellees.

Monks, J.

— Appellant filed his petition at the September term, 1895, of the board of commissioners of Cass county for a license to sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, etc., in the town of Galveston, Jackson township, in said county.

A remonstrance in writing signed by a majority of the legal voters of said township against granting said license to appellant wras filed *699on Thursday, August 29, 1895, with the auditor of said county, under the provisions of section 9 of an act of the General Assembly, approved March 11, 1895 (Acts 1895, p. 248), commonly known as the Nicholson law. If said remonstrance had been filed on Friday, August 30,1895, it would have been in time. *Flynn*v. *Taylor, ante,*533.

During the September term of said board of commissioners, and before final action on appellant’s application a number of the legal voters of said township who had signed said remonstrance, filed a petition with the board asking that their names be stricken from the remonstrance, and that they be allowed to withdraw their objections to a granting of a license to appellants.

It is admitted that said remonstrance is not signed by a majority of the voters of said township unless the signatures of those remonstrants who filed the petition to withdraw their names are counted.

Counsel for appellant contend that the said remonstrants had the right to withdraw from said remonstrance and dismiss the same as to themselves at any time before the action of the board.

This question was decided adversely to the contention of appellant’s counsel in *State*v. *Gerhardt, ante,*439.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          55,524
<SECURITIES>                                    89,304
<RECEIVABLES>                                      709
<ALLOWANCES>                                       103
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,400
<PP&E>                                          58,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,287
<BONDS>                                          4,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           544
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,862
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,994
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 101

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

#### § 101.540 Electronic TWIC inspection requirements for vessels, facilities, and OCS facilities not in Risk Group A.

A vessel or facility not in Risk Group A may use the electronic TWIC inspection requirements of § 101.535 in lieu of visual TWIC inspection. If electronic TWIC inspection is used, the recordkeeping requirements of § 104.235(b)(9) and (c) of this subchapter, or § 105.225(b)(9) and (c) of this subchapter, as appropriate, apply.

[USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57709, Aug. 23, 2016]
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0724 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 99-CE-13-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      91,399,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,987,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            96,312,000
<PP&E>                                      16,672,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             363,472,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,401,000
<BONDS>                                      1,656,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 303,971,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               363,472,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,379,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,371,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,371,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,371,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
        

</TABLE>
No. 01–15–00010–CV

IN THE

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

AT HOUSTON

________________________

Mark THOMPSON, SR.,

Appellant,

v.

Karen SMITH,

Appellee.

________________________

On Appeal from the 246th District Court of

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013–03434

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE FIRST COURT OF 

APPEALS:

NOW COMES Appellee, Karen Smith (“Smith”), and files this Motion to 

Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief pursuant to Rules 10.5(b) and 38.6(d) of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Smith respectfully requests that this Court 

grant her additional time to file her brief, and would show in support of her request 

the following: 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00010-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/8/2015 2:20:12 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/8/2015 2:20:12 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITY

1. There is no specific deadline to file this motion to extend. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 38.6 (d). 

2. The Court has the authority under Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d) to 

extend the time to file a brief. 

3. Smith’s brief is currently due on June 8, 2015. 

4. Smith requests an additional 30 days to file her brief, extending the 

time until July 8, 2015. 

5. One extension has been granted to extend the time to file Appellee’s

brief.

6. Smith needs additional time to file her brief because counsel for Smith 

had several matters to prepare for and try between the time Appellant brief was 

filed and Smith’s current deadline. Time was also lost to the flooding in the 

Houston area over Memorial Day. This, in conjunction with the routine matters 

that counsel for Smith attends to on a daily basis, has prevented counsel for Smith 

from being able to fully prepare Appellee’s brief by the June 8, 2015 deadline. 

7. This extension is not sought for delay but so that justice may be done. 

Smith seeks this extension so that she may prepare a thorough and well-developed 

brief to aid this Court in its analysis of the issue.
PRAYER

For these reasons, Smith prays that this Court grant her request for an 

extension of time to file her brief until July 8, 2015. 

Respectfully Submitted,

BUTEL & PICKETT, PLLC

________________________

G. Troy Pickett

Texas Bar No. 24072757

William A. Scheel 

Texas Bar No. 24075025

2222 Bissonnet, Ste. 203

Houston, Texas 77005

Tel.: 713–589–7140

Fax: 713–589–7141

email: gtpservice@butelpickett.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing was served in accordance with 

rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party or that 

party's lead counsel via e-service on June 8, 2015:

Party: Mark Thompson, Sr.

Lead attorney: Nida C. Wood

Address of service: 1330 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 1800

Houston, Texas 77056

_____________________

G. Troy Pickett

Attorney for Appellee
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Morton Industrial Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-68927 and 333-69575) on Form S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 27, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule, for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report
appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Morton
Industrial Group, Inc.

                                                      /s/ KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
April 24, 2006
#### § 580.3 Written notice of determination required.

Whenever the Administrator determines that there has been a violation by any person of section 12 of the Act relating to child labor or any regulation thereunder as set forth in part 579 of this chapter, or determines that there has been a violation by any person of section 3(m)(2)(B), or determines that there has been a repeated or willful violation by any person of section 6 or section 7 of the Act, and determines that imposition of a civil money penalty for such violation is appropriate, the Administrator shall issue and serve a notice of such penalty on such person in person or by certified mail. Where service by certified mail is not accepted by the party, notice shall be deemed received on the date of attempted delivery. Where service is not accepted, the Administrator may exercise discretion to serve the notice by regular mail.

[56 FR 24991, May 31, 1991, as amended at 86 FR 52987, Sept. 24, 2021]