alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. Wylie, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to
the best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

Date:  August 11, 2006                /s/ JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.
                                      ---------------------------
                                      James A. Wylie, Jr.
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)
(77 South. 1004)

#### QUICK v. STATE.

(5 Div. 271.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 22, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Russell County; J. S. Williams, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1321]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4557-N-03]

Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY:  Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 21, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Clifford Taffet, Department of 
Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the 
hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers 
are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 
1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: January 14, 2000.
Fred Karnas, Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 00-1321 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6005

JOE EARL LEWIS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL BELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-97-299)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Earl Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolin, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joe Earl Lewis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Bell, No. CA-97-299 (E.D.N.C.

Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 794.109 Statutory basis for inclusion of activities in enterprise.

The “enterprise” for purposes of enterprise coverage under section 3(s) and the exemption provision in section 7(b)(3), is defined in section 3(r) (§ 794.106) in terms of the activities in which it is engaged. All the “related activities” which are “performed * * * by any person or persons for a common business purpose” are included if they are performed “either through unified operation or common control.” This is true even if they are performed by more than one person, or in more than one establishment or by more than one corporate or other organizational unit. The definition specifically includes as a part of the enterprise, departments of an establishment operated through leasing arrangements. These statutory criteria are discussed in more detail in subsequent sections.
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY
LONGVIEW, WASHINGTON

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-14358) and the Registration Statement on 
Form S-8 (No. 33-37836) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 
33-56620) of Longview Fibre Company of our report dated December 7, 1995, 
which appears at Item 8 of Longview Fibre Company's Annual Report on Form 
10-K.




\s\ Price Waterhouse LLP
Price Waterhouse LLP

Portland, Oregon
January 23, 1996
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 39

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct popular 
   election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2008

Mr. Nelson of Florida introduced the following joint resolution; which 
     was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct popular 
   election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be jointly 
elected by the direct vote of the qualified electors of the several 
States and territories and the District constituting the seat of 
Government of the United States. The electors in each State, territory, 
and the District constituting the seat of Government of the United 
States shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most 
numerous branch of the legislative body where they reside.
    ``Section 2. Congress may determine the time, place, and manner of 
holding the election, the entitlement to inclusion on the ballot, and 
the manner in which the results of the election shall be ascertained 
and declared.''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10_23.htm


Exhibit 10.23





  
UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE   Promissory Note   Speedemissions, Inc. (a Florida corporation) agrees to pay Thomas Chorba, located at PO Box 421262 , Houston, Texas 77242, the sum of $56,000.00 by December 31, 2015. This amount represents a principal loan of $50,000.00 U.S. Dollars made by Thomas Chorba to Speedemissions, Inc., and 12% Interest on the principal sum totaling $6,000.00 during the term of the Promissory Note.   Speedemissions will pay make 18 monthly payments in the amount of $3,111.11 commencing  on the 1st of July, 2014 an  continuing until this Note is paid in full.  The parties hereby indicate by their signatures below that they have read and agree with the terms and conditions of this agreement.   /s/ Rich Parlontieri  SPEEDEMISSIONS, INC,  Rich Parlontieri, President/CEO   /s/ Thomas Chorba Thomas Chorba  DATE: 5/29/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHECULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ITEM 8 OF THIS FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     82,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,970
<PP&E>                                       1,562,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                 655,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,153,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,411
<BONDS>                                        409,374
<COMMON>                                        77,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     370,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,153,823
<SALES>                                        985,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               985,515
<CGS>                                          778,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  778,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,239
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             76,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
<PAGE>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.4  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Terry A. Hanson Terry A. Hanson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Date: February 26, 2007
### 3S140 Barkley Avenue Warrenville, Illinois 60555 P hone (630) 836

- 1000 Fax (630) 836

- 8850 September 21, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application for Amendment to Exemption No. 12696, Precision Midwest Ltd FAA Docket ID: FAA

- 2015

- 2262

Dear Sir or Madam:

Preci sion Midwest Ltd, (“PMW”) is requesting an amendment to add the following aircraft to Exemption No. 12696 for commercial use in aerial data collection and mapping:

1. Trimble ZX5 Multirotor UAS

The Trimble ZX5 is a rotorcraft weighing a maximum of 11 lbs. at takeoff, including payload which includes a digital camera system sensor. It will not operate at a speed greater than 87 knots. Preflight maintenance will be accomplished as set forth in the attached

" Operations Manual for unmanned aerial vehicle Trimble ZX5 " submitted with this request.

The Trimble ZX5 aircraft will be operated in accordance with the procedures set forth in the submitted manuals. The FAA has issued exemption grants in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in t his petition. We refer to granted Exemption No. 11110B to Trimble Navigation (see Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0367), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (“UA”) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gave the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation at issue was in the public interest.

To the extent necessary , PMW refers the FAA to its original exemption request submitted in Docket FAA

- 2015

- 2262 for a listing of regulations for which an exemption is being sought; a demonstration of the public interest; and a showing of an equivalent level of safety. Based on t he foregoing and for all the reasons set forth in PMW's previous filings in Docket 2015

- 2262, which are now incorporated by reference, PMW notes that the FAA has granted similar exemptions, as set forth above, for aerial data collection and mapping, and it , therefore, believes that this amendment request is subject to the FAA’s already announced Summary Exemption Process.

Respectfully,



### Richard A. Fisher President
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                            
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 7, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    THEODORE STALICK                                    
|                    |  |  |  | Theodore Stalick, Vice President andChief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 13, 2003



/s/ DENNIS L. SHOGRENDennis L. Shogren Chief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6797

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CURTIS ROSS SMITH, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-02-1246; CA-05-862-7) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 5, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Ross Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Curtis Ross Smith, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural findings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 780.517 “For use as Cigar-wrapper tobacco.”

The phrase “for use as Cigar-wrapper tobacco” limits the type of end product which may be produced by the exempt operations. As its name indicates, cigar-wrapper tobacco is used as a cigar wrapper and is distinguished from other types of tobacco which serve other purposes such as filler, pipe, chewing, and other kinds of tobacco. Normally, shade-grown tobacco is used only for cigar wrappers. However, if the tobacco is not being processed by the employer for such specific and limited use, the employee is not engaged in exempt processing operations.
§ 503.50 Decision and order of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The ALJ will prepare, within 60 days after completion of the hearing and closing of the record, a decision on the issues referred by the Administrator, WHD.
( b ) The decision of the ALJ will include a statement of the findings and conclusions, with reasons and basis therefore, upon each material issue presented on the record. The decision will also include an appropriate order which may affirm, deny, reverse, or modify, in whole or in part, the determination of the Administrator, WHD. The reason or reasons for such order will be stated in the decision.
( c ) In the event that the Administrator, WHD assesses back wages for wage violation(s) of § 503.16 based upon a PWD obtained by the Administrator from OFLC during the investigation and the ALJ determines that the Administrator's request was not warranted, the ALJ will remand the matter to the Administrator for further proceedings on the Administrator's determination. If there is no such determination and remand by the ALJ, the ALJ will accept as final and accurate the wage determination obtained from OFLC or, in the event the party filed a timely appeal under 20 CFR 655.13 the final wage determination resulting from that process. Under no circumstances will the ALJ determine the validity of the wage determination or require submission into evidence or disclosure of source data or the names of establishments contacted in developing the survey which is the basis for the PWD.
( d ) The decision will be served on all parties.
( e ) The decision concerning civil money penalties, debarment, monetary relief, and/or other administrative remedies, when served by the ALJ will constitute the final agency order unless the ARB, as provided for in § 503.51, determines to review the decision.
**Exhibit
      24.1**





**McMoRan
      Exploration Co.**





**Secretary’s
      Certificate**





I,
      Douglas N. Currault II, Assistant Secretary of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the
      “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
      of Delaware, do hereby certify that the following resolution was duly adopted
      by
      the Sole Director of the Corporation by written consent on November 12, 1998,
      and that such resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded and is
      in
      full force and effect on the date hereof:





RESOLVED,
      That any report, registration statement or other form filed on behalf of this
      corporation pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act


of
      1934,
      or any amendment to any such report, registration statement or other form,
      may
      be signed on behalf of any director or officer of this corporation pursuant
      to a
      power of attorney executed by such director or officer.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the seal of the
      Corporation on February 8, 2006.

















/s/
      Douglas N. Currault II


Douglas
      N. Currault II


Assistant
      Secretary


Seal