alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24-aPOWER OF ATTORNEY     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutesand appoints each of Robert E. Switz and Gokul V. Hemmady, with full power to each to act withoutthe other, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution,for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the Company’s fiscalyear ended October 31, 2006, and any or all amendments to said Annual Report, and to file the same,with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, and to file the same with such other authorities as necessary, granting untoeach such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every actand thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents andpurposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that eachsuch attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons onthe dates indicated below their names.                /s/ John A. Blanchard III John A. Blanchard III            /s/ Lois M. Martin Lois M. Martin  Date: 1/5/07 Date: 1/5/07                 /s/ John J. Boyle John J. Boyle III           /s/ William R. Spivey William R. Spivey  Date: 1/5/07 Date: 1/5/07                 /s/ James C. Castle James C. Castle            /s/ Jean-Pierre Rosso Jean-Pierre Rosso  Date: 1/5/07 Date: 1/5/07                 /s/ Mickey P. Foret Mickey P. Foret            /s/ John E. Rehfeld John E. Rehfeld  Date: 1/5/07 Date: 1/5/07                 /s/ J. Kevin Gilligan J. Kevin Gilligan            /s/ Larry W. Wangberg Larry W. Wangberg  Date: 1/5/07 Date: 1/5/07                   /s/ John D Wunsch John D. Wunsch    Date: 1/5/07
§ 452.78 Expenditures by employers. ( a ) As an additional safeguard, section 401(g) provides that no money of an employer is to be contributed or applied to promote the candidacy of any person in an election subject to the provisions of title IV. This includes indirect as well as direct expenditures. Thus, for example, campaigning by union stewards on company time with the approval of the employer would violate section 401(g) unless it can be shown that they are on legitimate work assignments, and that their campaign activities are only incidental to the performance of their assigned task and do not interfere with its performance. This prohibition against the use of employer money includes any costs incurred by an employer, or anything of value contributed by an employer, in order to support the candidacy of any individual in an election. It would not, however, extend to ordinary business practices which result in conferring a benefit, such as, for example, a discount on the cost of printing campaign literature which is made available on the same terms to other customers.
( b ) The prohibition against the use of employer money to support the candidacy of a person in any election subject to the provisions of title IV is not restricted to employers who employ members of the labor organization in which the election is being conducted, or who have any business or contractual relationship with the labor organization.
#### § 94.110 Are any of my Federal assistance awards exempt from this part?

This part does not apply to any award that the Secretary of Labor or designee determines that the application of this part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the laws or regulations of a foreign government.
#### § 779.340 Out-of-State customers.

Whether the sale or service is made to an out-of-State customer is a question of fact. In order for a customer to be considered an out-of-State customer, some specific relationship between him and the seller has to exist to indicate his out-of-State character. Sales made to the casual cash-and-carry customer of a retail or service establishment, who, for all practical purposes, is indistinguishable from the mass of customers who visit the establishment, are sales made within the State even though the seller knows or has reason to believe, because of his proximity to the State line or because he is frequented by tourists, that some of the customers who visit his establishment reside outside the State. If the customer is of that type, sales made to him are sales made within the State even if the seller knows in the particular instance that the customer resides outside the State. On the other hand, a sale is made to an out-of-State customer and, therefore, is not a sale made “within the State” in which the establishment is located, if delivery of the goods is made outside the State. It should be noted that sales of goods or services that are conditioned upon acceptance or rejection by an out-of-State source are interstates sales and not sales made within the State for purposes of section 13(a)(2). For example, a contract entered into in the State where the customer resides for the delivery of a magazine to the customer's residence, is an interstate sale if the contract must be approved by the out-of-State home office of the company publishing the magazine before it becomes effective.
Table IV.B.1-2

Projections of 2014 E85 Consumption, Ordered from Lowest to Highest

Source Value Units

Value in 

MMGal Notes

Actual 2012 consumption 40 mill gal

EIA Refiner and Blender Net Production 

of Conventional Gasoline Greater than 

Ed55

891 Mbbl 37.4

Production, not 

consumption. 

Conventional only.

Scaling up 2012 consumption to account for BAU 

growth in E85 stations and more FFVs 80 mill gal EPA assumption, 2 x 40 mill gal 80 MMGal 80 EPA doubling the 40 MMG

University of Iowa comments 300 mill gal No citation given

EIA Short Term Energy Outlook, July 2013 400 mill gal

Calculated from July 2013 STEO values 

for gasoline consumption and ethanol 

consumption in 2014. See "STEO" tab

444

DOE estimate of maximum throughput from 2012 

waiver denial 600 mill gal

"Department of Energy Analyses in 

Support of the EPA Evaluation of Waivers 

of the Renewable Fuel Standard" 

November 2012. 

600 Not checked

All FFVs with access to E85 use it 50% of the 

time, assuming that access is defined as one-infour retail stations

640 mill gal EPA asumption, approximately 1/2 x 1,275 

mill gal 637.5 MMGal

DOE estimate, after adjusting for projected 

number of E85 stations in 2014 860 mill gal

EPA assumption, 3300 stations rather than 

2300 stations selling same average volume 

as DOE assumed for its waiver analysis

860.9 MMGal 861

AEO2013 projection 1,021 mill gal AEO2013 Table 11 0.06661 MMbbl/day 1,021

All FFVs with access to E85 use it 100% of the 

time, assuming that access is defined as one-infour retail stations1,275 mill gal

"Application of one-in-four E85 access 

methodology to 2014", Memorandum from 

David Korotney to EPA docket EPA-HQOAR-2013-0479. 

Not checked
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

 ROBERT DAVIS,     Petitioner     v.   COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,     Respondent 

No. 95 EM 2015    

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2015, the Petition for King’s Bench 

Jurisdiction is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of 
employees from Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 
as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
July 29, 2011, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of 
employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 
agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked in any 
area at the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 
from January 1, 1949 through December 31, 1962, for a number of work 
days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely 
under this employment, or in combination with work days within the 
parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 
the Special Exposure Cohort.

    This designation will become effective on September 9, 2011, unless 
Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this 
effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any 
provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to 
the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can 
also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4105020012010205026f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6024232133202324234e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-20925 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 

### 2011

- NM

- 1 26

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18
of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, John Aglialoro, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN AGLIALORO               
|                      |  |  |  | John Aglialoro                      
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Florida Industries

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Best, Ethel L. (Ethel Lombard)					 and 	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth. 						*Women in Florida Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 80*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1930,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5388,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
##### 



(a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,026
<SECURITIES>                                     4,035
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,314
<INVENTORY>                                     38,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,107
<PP&E>                                         163,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,324
<BONDS>                                        138,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   320,463
<SALES>                                        222,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,968
<CGS>                                          189,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  211,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                     743
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.63


</TABLE>
#### § 794.137 Effect of activities other than “wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products.”

As previously noted, in some cases the related activities performed through unified operation or common control for a common business purpose which are included in the enterprise under the definition in section 3(r) of the Act may include activities other than the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products. Examples are tire recapping or gasoline station services, the sale and servicing of oil burners, or the distribution of coal, ice, feed, building supplies, paint, etc. In some instances, as in the case of oil-burner servicing, these other activities are customarily performed as an incident to or in conjunction with the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products in the enterprises of the industry engaged in such distribution. As indicated in § 794.104, employees of the enterprise who engage in such activities are within the general scope of the exemption. However, activities which are not customary practices of enterprises in the industry of wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products are not within the scope of the intent of the section 7(b)(3) exemption. For example, construction activities, operation of a sporting goods store, scrap paper and metal activities, the operation of a general repair garage, etc., are not the type of activities for which the section 7(b)(3) exemption was intended. Thus, where an enterprise engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products operates a general repair garage, a mechanic servicing the automobiles and trucks brought to the garage by customers will not for that reason be within the exemption provided by section 7(b)(3), although the exemption provided by section 13(a)(2) may apply to him if the garage qualifies as an exempt retail or service establishment under the tests provided in that section of the Act. On the other hand, mechanics employed by an enterprise engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products for the purpose of keeping the distribution equipment of the enterprise in good repair would come within the 7(b)(3) exemption.
§ 500.159 Submission of plan. ( a ) Any State agency desiring to enter into an agreement pursuant to section 513 of the Act shall submit a State plan in such form and in such detail as the Secretary shall direct.
( b ) Each such plan shall include, at least, the following: ( 1 ) The delegation sought;
( 2 ) The State authority for performing such delegated functions;
( 3 ) A description of the manner in which the State intends to carry out such functions; and
( 4 ) The estimated cost of carrying out such functions.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Morton Industrial Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-68927 and 333-69575) on Form S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 27, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule, for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report
appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Morton
Industrial Group, Inc.

                                                      /s/ KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
June 7, 2006
#### In the Matter of Masao Yonamine, Appellant, v Charles S. Hirsch, as Chief Medical Examiner, et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 5, 1996;

decided October 10, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Supreme Court order dismissing the petition, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion *(see,*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602 [a]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division orders denying poor person relief and renewal, dismissed upon the ground that those orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for person relief dismissed as academic.