alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James R. Moffett, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  February 28, 2011








/s/ James R. Moffett


James R. Moffett


President and Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### Ground water in the Southington-Granby area, Connecticut

By: Harold Schjoth Palmer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp466

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
     <CIK>     0000064500
     <NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                   63,344
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,011,585
<ALLOWANCES>                            105,298
<INVENTORY>                           3,341,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      5,583,614
<PP&E>                                1,543,712
<DEPRECIATION>                          873,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,891,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,045,826
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 248
<COMMON>                                149,795
<OTHER-SE>                            2,681,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,891,620
<SALES>                              13,206,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     13,206,557
<CGS>                                 6,982,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        12,714,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         32,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      163,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         325,224
<INCOME-TAX>                             41,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     283,424
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            283,424
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.01


</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Madison Gas and Electric Company on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-52491 and
Registration No. 33-24115) of our report dated February 7, 1997, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements of Madison Gas and Electric Company
as of December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, and for the years then ended, which
reports are included or incorporated by reference in this annual report on
Form 10-K.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 24, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Lite King  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Date:  January 10, 2007                      By:      /s/ John T. Ruddy
                                                      -----------------------
                                             Name:    John T. Ruddy
                                             Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to Lite King  Corporation
and will be retained by Lite King  Corporation  and furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
Exhibit 21.1 –Subsidiaries of the Company 

 

Mercury Casualty Company

Mercury Insurance Company 

Mercury Insurance Company of Illinois 

Mercury Indemnity Company of Illinois 

Mercury Insurance Company of Georgia 

MercuryIndemnity Company of Georgia 

Mercury Insurance Company of Florida 

Mercury Indemnity Company of Florida 

California Automobile Insurance Company 

California General Underwriters Insurance Company, Inc. 

Concord Insurance Services, Inc. 

Mercury Insurance Services, LLC 

Mercury County Mutual Insurance Company* 

American Mercury Insurance Company 

American Mercury Lloyds Insurance Company* 

AFI Management Company, Inc. 

American MercuryMGA, Inc. 

 

*Controlled byMercury General Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 425 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 425

       Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2008

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Making minority party appointments for the 110th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following be the minority membership on the 
following committees for the remainder of the 110th Congress, or until 
their successors are appointed:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. McCain, Mr. Warner, Mr. Inhofe, 
Mr. Sessions, Ms. Collins, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Dole, Mr. 
Cornyn, Mr. Thune, Mr. Martinez, and Mr. Wicker.
    Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: Mr. Shelby, Mr. 
Bennett, Mr. Allard, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. 
Dole, Mr. Martinez, and Mr. Corker.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Stevens, 
Mr. McCain, Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Smith, Mr. Ensign, Mr. 
Sununu, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Wicker.
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Kyl, 
Mr. Smith, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Ensign, and Mr. 
Sununu.
    Committee on Rules and Administration: Mr. Bennett, Mr. Stevens, 
Mr. McConnell, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Chambliss, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Hagel, 
Mr. Alexander, and Mr. Ensign.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Burr, Mr. Specter, Mr. Craig, 
Mr. Isakson, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hutchison, and Mr. Wicker.
                                 <all>
```
(77 South. 1004)

#### SCHROEDER v. CITY OF MOBILE.

(1 Div. 269.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 15, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Claud Grayson, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 90407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30007]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Aging Aircraft 
Program (Widespread Fatigue Damage)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew a previously approved 
information collection. The ``Aging Aircraft Program (Widespread 
Fatigue Damage)'' final rule amended FAA regulation pertaining to 
certification and operation of transport category airplanes to preclude 
widespread fatigue damage in those airplanes.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by February 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ronda 
Thompson, Room 441, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 950 
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson by email at: 
Ronda.Thompson@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0743.
    Title: Aging Aircraft Program (Widespread Fatigue Damage).
    Form Numbers:
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The rule requires that type certificate and 
supplemental type certificate holders use documentation to demonstrate 
to their FAA Oversight Office that they have complied with the rule by 
establishing limits of validity of the engineering data that supports 
the maintenance program (LOVs). Operators would submit the LOV to their 
Principal Maintenance Inspectors to demonstrate that they are compliant 
with the rule.
    Respondents: Approximately 30 operators.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 20 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 167 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 8, 2016.
Ronda L. Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy, and 
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2016-30007 Filed 12-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

                               UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of Patron  Systems,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with  respect to the report of the Company on
Form  10-QSB/A  for the fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB/A Report") that:

         1.       the 10-QSB/A  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         2.       the  information  contained  in  the  10-QSB/A  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 21, 2007                        /S/ BRADEN WAVERLEY
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Braden Waverley
                                          Chief Executive Officer
#### § 784.126 Operation of the fishing vessel.

In extending the minimum wage to seamen on American vessels by limiting the exemption from minimum wages and overtime provided by section 13(a)(12) of the Act to “any employee employed as a seaman on a vessel other than an American vessel”, and at the same time extending the minimum wage to “onshore” but not “offshore” operations concerned with aquatic products, the Congress, in the 1961 amendments to the Act, did not indicate any intent to remove the crews of fishing vessels engaged in operations named in section 13(a)(5) from the exemption provided by that section. The exemption provided by section 13(a)(12), above noted, and the general exemption in section 13(b)(6) from overtime for “any employee employed as a seaman” (whether or not on an American vessel) apply, in general to employees, working aboard vessels, whose services are rendered primarily as an aid to navigation. It appears, however, that it is not the custom or practice in the fishing industry for a fishing vessel to have two crews; namely, a fishing crew whose duty it is primarily to fish and to perform other duties incidental thereto and a navigational crew whose duty it is primarily to operate the boat. Where, as is the typical situation, there is but one crew which performs all these functions, the section 13(a)(5) exemptions would apply to its members. For a further explanation of the seaman's exemption, see part 783 of this chapter.
#### §§ 825.116-825.118 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010.

2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### § 1.01-90 Commissioned, warrant, and petty officers.

Any commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the United States Coast Guard may be authorized to carry out the functions delegated to superior officials under §§ 1.01-1, 1.01-20, 1.01-30, 1.01-70, and 1.07-80, or redelegated under § 1.01-85, within the jurisdiction of the cognizant official. They will do so under the supervision and general direction of that official.

[CGD 91-225, 59 FR 66485, Dec. 27, 1994]
#### GREG C.’S APPEAL FROM PROBATE

(AC 18392)

O’Connell, C. J., and Schaller and Hennessy, Js.

Argued September 1, 1999

officially released January 25, 2000

*440
      *Earl Mitchell,*certified legal intern, with whom were *Royal J. Stark,*and *John Myer, Rachel Proulx*and *Hon Choi,*certified legal interns, for the appellant (plaintiff).

*William F. Breg,*for the appellee (defendant Michelle V.).

*Robert E. Lancaster*and *Michael Lifrak*and *Elsie Miller,*law student interns, filed a brief for Advocacy Unlimited, National Association for Rights Protection and Advocacy, and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities as amici curiae.

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Greg C., appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from the judgment of the Probate Court for the district of Waterbury ordering the appointment of a conservator of his person and estate.

The Superior Court dismissed the appeal because it was not taken within the time required pursuant to General Statutes § 45a-187.1 Our examination of the record and briefs and consideration of the oral arguments of the parties persuades us that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

The issue of whether the appeal from probate was timely taken was properly resolved in the Superior Court’s thoughtful and comprehensive memorandum of decision. *Greg C.’s Appeal from Probate,*46 Conn. Sup. 232, 744 A.2d 961 (1998). Because the memorandum of decision fully addresses the dispositive issue raised in *441this appeal, we adopt it as a proper statement of the facts and the applicable law on that issue. It would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion contained therein. *In re Karrlo K.,*40 Conn. App. 73, 75, 668 A.2d 1353 (1996).

The judgment is affirmed.

General Statutes § 45a-187 (a) provides in relevant part: “An appeal under section 45a-186 by those of the age of majority and who are present or who have legal notice to be present, or who have been given notice of their right to request a hearing or have filed a written waiver of their right to a hearing, shall be taken within thirty days. If such persons have no notice to be present and are not present, or have not been given notice of their right to request a hearing, then appeal shall be taken within twelve months . . . .”
#### § 779.242 Goods that “have been moved in” commerce.

For the purpose of section 3(s), goods will be considered to “have been moved * * * in commerce” when they have moved across State lines before they are handled, sold, or otherwise worked on by the employees. It is immaterial in such a case that the goods may have “come to rest” within the meaning of the term “in commerce” as interpreted in other respects, before they are handled, sold, or otherwise worked on by the employees in the enterprise. Such movement in commerce may take place before they have reached the enterprise, or within the enterprise, such as from a warehouse of the enterprise in one State to a retail store of the same enterprise located in another State. Thus, employees will be considered to be “handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods that have been moved in * * * commerce” where they are engaged in the described activities on “goods” that have moved across State lines at any time in the course of business, such as from the manufacturer to the distributor, or to the “enterprise,” or from one establishment to another within the “enterprise.” See the general discussion in part 776 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maria Henry, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial position and result of operations of the Company.

 

In renderingthis certification, I note that information in the Report relates to periodsprior to my affiliation with the Company, as disclosed in the Company’s Form8-K filed on September 24, 2002.  Ijoined the Company on October 14, 2002 as its Chief Financial Officer.

 
| /s/ Maria  Henry         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Maria Henry              |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| November 14,  2002       |

 

----
#### Salvatore R. Curiale, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Liquidator of Nassau Insurance Company, Respondent, v Ardra Insurance Co., Ltd., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted March 25, 1996;

decided April 30, 1996

Motion to dismiss appeal, etc., denied.
#### § 780.2 Exemptions from Act's requirements.

The Act provides a number of specific exemptions from the general requirements described in § 780.1. Some are exemptions from the overtime provisions only. Others are from the child labor provisions only. Several are exemptions from both the minimum wage and the overtime requirements of the Act. Finally, there are some exemptions from all three—minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor requirements. An employer who claims an exemption under the Act has the burden of showing that it applies (*Walling* v. *General Industries Co.,* 330 U.S. 545; *Mitchell* v. *Kentucky Finance Co.,* 359 U.S. 290). Conditions specified in the language of the Act are “explicit prerequisites to exemption” (*Arnold* v. *Kanowsky,* 361 U.S. 388). “The details with which the exemptions in this Act have been made preclude their enlargement by implication” and “no matter how broad the exemption, it is meant to apply only to” the specified activities (*Addison* v. *Holly Hill,* 322 U.S. 607; *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254). Exemptions provided in the Act “are to be narrowly construed against the employer seeking to assert them” and their application limited to those who come “plainly and unmistakably within their terms and spirit” (*Phillips* v. *Walling,* 334 U.S. 490; *Mitchell* v. *Kentucky Finance Co.,* 359 U.S. 290; *Arnold* v. *Kanowsky,* 361 U.S. 388).