alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed April 6,

and on appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed April 13,

reconsideration allowed; opinion (118 Or App 512, 848 P2d 616) modified and adhered to as modified May 19,

both petitions for review denied July 27, 1993 (317 Or 271)

#### Gordon G. CARLSON, *Appellant, v.*RESERVATION RANCH, a partnership consisting of Henry Westbrook, III and Robert Lane Westbrook, partners, *Third-Party Plaintiff - Respondent, and*S. E. COMFORT and Douglas County Lumber Company, *Third-Party Defendants.*

(CV 89-0623; CA A72403)

852 P2d 933

Frank R. Alderson, Judge pro tempore. (Motion for Summary Judgment)

Lann D. Leslie and Atherly, Butler & Burgott, Eugene, for petition of respondent.

*436Larry O. Gildea, Nickolas Facaros and Gildea & Facaros, Eugene, for petition of appellant.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

EDMONDS, J.

*437EDMONDS, J.

Plaintiff appealed a judgment upholding the reservation of a timber interest in a deed. We reversed. 118 Or App 512, 848 P2d 616 (1993). Both parties filed petitions for review, which we treat as petitions for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15. We allow reconsideration on both petitions and adhere to our opinion as modified.

In our opinion, we held that the deed reserves a perpetual interest in “all timber.” We also held that the phrase “all timber” was ambiguous and precluded summary-judgment. The reservation at issue consisted of two components: a durational component (“now growing or being or which may hereafter be grown”), which we held to create a perpetual interest, and a subject component (“all timber”), which we held was ambiguous. By holding that the phrase “all timber’ ’ was ambiguous, we were not referring to the size of the timber. Rather, we meant that the deed was ambiguous as to the species of trees reserved.

The parties’ other arguments do not require further discussion.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
#### § 570.114 General.

It should be noted that section 12(a) does not directly outlaw the employment of oppressive child labor. Instead, it prohibits the shipment or delivery for shipment in interstate or foreign commerce of goods produced in an establishment where oppressive child labor has been employed within 30 days before removal of the goods. Section 12(c), on the other hand, is a direct prohibition against the employment of oppressive child labor in commerce, or in the production of goods for commerce. Moreover, the two subsections provide different methods for determining the employees who are covered thereby. Thus, subsection (a) may be said to apply to young workers on an “establishment” basis. If the standards for child labor are not observed in the employment of minors in or about an establishment where goods are produced and from which such goods are removed within the statutory 30-day period, it becomes unlawful for any producer, manufacturer, or dealer (other than an innocent purchaser who is in compliance with the requirements for a good faith defense as provided in the subsection) to ship or deliver those goods for shipment in commerce. It is not necessary for the minor himself to have been employed by the producer of such goods or in their production in order for the ban to apply. On the other hand, whether the employment of a particular minor below the applicable age standard will subject his employer to the prohibition of subsection (c) is dependent upon the minor himself being employed in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Act. If such a minor is so employed by his employer and is not specifically exempt from the child labor provisions then his employment under such circumstances constitutes a violation of section 12(c) regardless of where he may be employed or what his employer may do. Moreover, a violation of section 12(c) occurs under the foregoing circumstances without regard to whether there is a “removal” of goods or a shipment or delivery for shipment in commerce.

[36 FR 25157, Dec. 29, 1971]
Order filed, February 05, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00028-CV

____________

LANE-VALENTE INDUSTRIES (NAT'L), INC, Appellant

V.

J.P. MORGAN CHASE, N.A. AND BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-36514

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 03, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Donna King, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New York State 
Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the New York State Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:30 p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 22, 2000, at the 
Sheraton University Hotel, 801 University Avenue, Syracuse, NY 13210. 
The Committee will (1) review its project proposal, Police-Community 
Relations in New York (2) plan a series of forums around the state 
based on the proposal and (3) be briefed by community advocates and 
officials on police-community relations in Syracuse.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern 
Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, May 25, 2000.
Lisa M. Kelly,
Special Assistant to the Staff Director, Regional Programs Coordination 
Unit.
[FR Doc. 00-13678 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-F
§ 825.802 Special rules for airline flight crew employees, calculation of leave. ( a ) *Amount of leave.* ( 1 ) An eligible airline flight crew employee is entitled to 72 days of FMLA leave during any 12-month period for one, or more, of the FMLA-qualifying reasons set forth in §§ 825.112(a)(1)-(5). This entitlement is based on a uniform six-day workweek for all airline flight crew employees, regardless of time actually worked or paid, multiplied by the statutory 12-workweek entitlement for FMLA leave. For example, if an employee took six weeks of leave for an FMLA-qualifying reason, the employee would use 36 days (6 days × 6 weeks) of the employee's 72-day entitlement.
( 2 ) An eligible airline flight crew employee is entitled to 156 days of military caregiver leave during a single 12-month period to care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness under § 825.112(a)(6). This entitlement is based on a uniform six-day workweek for all airline flight crew employees, regardless of time actually worked or paid, multiplied by the statutory 26-workweek entitlement for military caregiver leave.
( b ) *Increments of FMLA leave for intermittent or reduced schedule leave.* When an airline flight crew employee takes FMLA leave on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis, the employer must account for the leave using an increment no greater than one day. For example, if an airline flight crew employee needs to take FMLA leave for a two-hour physical therapy appointment, the employer may require the employee to use a full day of FMLA leave. The entire amount of leave actually taken (in this example, one day) is designated as FMLA leave and counts against the employee's FMLA entitlement.
( c ) *Application of § 825.205 .* The rules governing calculation of intermittent or reduced schedule FMLA leave set forth in § 825.205 do not apply to airline flight crew employees except that airline flight crew employees are subject to § 825.205(a)(2), the physical impossibility provision.
§ 95.35 Supplies and other expendable property. ( a ) Title to supplies and other expendable property shall vest in the recipient upon acquisition. If there is a residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $5,000 in total aggregate value upon termination or completion of the project or program and the supplies are not needed for any other federally-sponsored project or program, the recipient shall retain the supplies for use on non-Federal sponsored activities or sell them, but shall, in either case, compensate the Federal Government for its share. The amount of compensation shall be computed in the same manner as for equipment.
( b ) The recipient shall not use supplies acquired with Federal funds to provide services to non-Federal outside organizations for a fee that is less than private companies charge for equivalent services, unless specifically authorized by Federal statute as long as the Federal Government retains an interest in the supplies.
Page 

Executive Summary: 

Changes to Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base in 1999 .......................................... Facility Information .............................................................................................. 

Executive Graphic Presentation: 

Facilities 

U.S. Private Shipyards: Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base . October 1999 ............ Private Shipyards by Classification: Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base . October 1999 ............................................................................................... Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base Facilities: U.S. Private Shipyards - 

October 1982 vs . October 1999 ..................................................................... 

Production Workers: 

Production Workers In Private Shipyards: Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base . 

October 1999 ............................................................................................... Production Workers In Private Shipyards: Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base . 

1982 Through 1999 ...................................................................................... Production Workers In Private Shipyards: Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base . 

1982 vs . 1999 ........................................................................................... .' 

Shipyard Classification Definitions ........................................................................... 

Major U.S. Private Shipbuilding and Repair Facilities ..................... .......................... 

East Coast Facilities ......................................................................................... Gulf Coast Facilities ........................................................................................... West Coast Facilities ........................................................................................... Great Lakes Facilities ........................................................................................... Non-Conus Facilities ............................................................................................ 

F
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements filed during the week ending May 
19, 2000

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application
    Docket Number: OST-2000-7385.
    Date Filed: May 17, 2000.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:
PTC2 EUR 0309 dated 2 May 2000 r1-r17;
PTC2 EUR 0310 dated 2 May 2000 r18;
PTC2 EUR 0311 dated 2 May 2000 r19-r20;
PTC2 EUR 0312 dated 2 May 2000 r21-r22;
Within Europe Resolutions r1-r22;
Minutes--PTC2 EUR 0308 dated 28 April 2000;
Tables--None;
Intended effective date: 15 June, 1 August, 1 September, 1 October 
2000.

Dorothy Y. Beard,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-13360 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.454 Training requirements. This section supplements and clarifies the requirements of § 1926.21(b)(2) as these relate to the hazards of work on scaffolds. ( a ) The employer shall have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. The training shall include the following areas, as applicable: ( 1 ) The nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area;
( 2 ) The correct procedures for dealing with electrical hazards and for erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection systems and falling object protection systems being used;
( 3 ) The proper use of the scaffold, and the proper handling of materials on the scaffold;
( 4 ) The maximum intended load and the load-carrying capacities of the scaffolds used; and
( 5 ) Any other pertinent requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The employer shall have each employee who is involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. The training shall include the following topics, as applicable: ( 1 ) The nature of scaffold hazards;
( 2 ) The correct procedures for erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, inspecting, and maintaining the type of scaffold in question;
( 3 ) The design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity and intended use of the scaffold;
( 4 ) Any other pertinent requirements of this subpart.
( c ) When the employer has reason to believe that an employee lacks the skill or understanding needed for safe work involving the erection, use or dismantling of scaffolds, the employer shall retrain each such employee so that the requisite proficiency is regained. Retraining is required in at least the following situations: ( 1 ) Where changes at the worksite present a hazard about which an employee has not been previously trained; or
( 2 ) Where changes in the types of scaffolds, fall protection, falling object protection, or other equipment present a hazard about which an employee has not been previously trained; or
( 3 ) Where inadequacies in an affected employee's work involving scaffolds indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite proficiency.
Non-Mandatory Appendices
#### § 780.152 General scope of specified delivery operations.

Employment in “secondary” agriculture, under section 3(f), includes employment in “delivery to storage or to market or to carriers for transportation to market” when performed by a farmer as an incident to or in conjunction with his own farming operations. To the extent that such deliveries may be accomplished without leaving the farm where the commodities delivered are grown, the exemption extends also to employees of someone other than the farmer who raised them if they are performing such deliveries for the farmer. However, normally such deliveries require travel off the farm, and where this is the case, only employees of a farmer engaged in making them can come within section 3(f). Such employees would not be engaged in agriculture in any workweek when they delivered commodities of other farmers, however, because such deliveries would not be performed as an incident to or in conjunction with “such” farming operations, as explained previously. If the “delivery” trip is within section 3(f) the necessary return trip to the farm is also included.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, John Busshaus, of Wizzard Software Corporation (the "small business issuer"), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:5/14/07/s/ John BusshausJohn Busshaus    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the Trust), does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017 (the Form 10-K) of the Trust fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

SOUTHWEST BANK,

NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY

AS TRUSTEE OF MARINE
PETROLEUM TRUST



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                    
|Ron E. Hooper                        
|Senior Vice President, Southwest Bank

Dated: September 28, 2017

The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.