alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2

 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 AND NOTICE PURSUANT TO
 BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT

 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 AND NOTICE PURSUANT TO BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT, dated June 14, 2012 (this “Amendment”), is between General Moly, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”), and Hanlong (USA) Mining Investment, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Lender”).

 

RECITALS

 

A.            The Company and Lender are parties to the Bridge Loan Agreement, dated March 4, 2010 (as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Bridge Loan Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, that certain Amendment No. 2 to Bridge Loan Agreement, dated July 7, 2011, and as further amended, restated or replaced the “Agreement”);

 

B.            The Company and Lender are parties to the Option to Amend Bridge Loan Agreement, dated January 9, 2012 (as further amended, restated or replaced, the “Option”); and

 

C.            Pursuant to the Option, the Company desires to amend the Agreement as permitted by the Option.

 

Accordingly, the Company gives notice of this Amendment.

 

NOTICE AND AGREEMENT

 

Section 3.1(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“The Company shall repay the outstanding principal amounts of, and pay all accrued and unpaid interest on, the Bridge Loans on or before April 30, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”).”

 

Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Signature page follows]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date first above written.

 

 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   Bruce D. Hansen
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Bruce   D. Hansen
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    	
 
    


 

 

HANLONG (USA) MINING INVESTMENT, INC.

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   Nelson Feng Chen
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Nelson   Feng Chen
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Director
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Elgrande.com, Inc.  (the "Company")

On  Form  10-QSB   for  the period  ended   August 31, 2004 as  filed  with the

Securities  and Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"),  I,

Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of

the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant

to section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,  that  to the  best  of my

knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)

or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2)  The  information

contained in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the

financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael F. Holloran

Michael F. Holloran

Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer



October 20, 2004
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 245 

Congratulating the University of Arizona Wildcats for winning the 2007 

NCAA Division I Softball Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2007 

Mr. KYL (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Arizona Wildcats for 

winning the 2007 NCAA Division I Softball Championship. 

Whereas on June 6, 2007, the University of Arizona (UA) 

Wildcats of Tucson, Arizona, won the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Women’s College World Series Softball Championship by defeating the University of 

Tennessee Lady Volunteers by a score of 5 to 0, winning 

their 8th title since 1991; 

Whereas, in the championship game, UA pitcher Taryne 

Mowatt set a Women’s College World Series record by 

pitching 60 innings and was named the tournament’s 

Most Outstanding Player; 

Whereas Kristie Fox, Jenae Leles, and Caitlin Lowe were selected to be on the all-tournament team; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 245 ATS 

Whereas the UA Wildcats completed the season with a 50– 

14–1 record, climbing from the loser’s bracket to emerge 

victorious; and 

Whereas Coach Mike Candrea has taken the UA Wildcats to 

the Women’s College World Series 19 times over the last 

20 years, and won 8 national championship titles: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the University of Arizona 

3 Wildcats for winning the 2007 NCAA Division I 

4 Women’s Softball Championship; and 

5 (2) recognizes all the players, coaches, and sup6 port staff who were instrumental in this achieve7 ment. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
(75 South. 1006)

#### HEREFORD v. BINGHAM.

(8 Div. 504.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; R. C. Brieltell, Judge.

Betts & Betts, of Hunstville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
1

Filed 9/ 18 /20 P. v. Moralez CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or
or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
MARIO MORALE Z

, Defendant and Appellant. A158710

(Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR724066)

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

One evening in January 2019, police officer Eduardo Espino was

dispatched to the Coddingto w n Mall in Santa Rosa where a private security

guard had arrested Mario Morale z for trespassing. Morale z had been told in

writing that he was barred from access to the m all but the guard found him

in the parking lot area. The guard handcuffed him and conducted a pat

- down

for weapons, finding a large kitchen knife measuring just over six inches

secreted in the left pocket of his jacket.

Morale z was subsequently charged wi th two offenses: c ount o ne,

p ossession of dirk or dagger ( Pen. Cod e , § 21310) , and count two,

m isdemeanor trespass ( Pen. Cod e , § 6 02, subd. (t)(1)). Additionally, it was

1 We resolve this case by memorandum opinion because it raises no substantial issue of fact or law. (California Standards of Judicial Administration, § 8.1.)2

alleged that he had suffered a prison prior conviction in 2013

. ( Pen

. Cod e , § 667.5

. ) Morale z pleaded no contest to count one

, and the remaining

allegation s were dismissed. He was then sentenced to a split term

( Pen

. Cod e, § 1170, subd

. (h) ) , totaling 24 months, partially in custody and

partially under mandatory supervision by the probation department.

After a certificate of probable cause to appeal was denied on October 8

,
2019

, Mo rale z filed a notice of appeal , proceeding pro se

. His notice of appeal

does not specify whether he seeks review of the judgment of conviction, the

sentence, or some specific order entered prior to or after conviction.

A ppointed appellate counsel has filed a brief asking this court to

conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are

arguable appella te issues pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

( Wende ).

The Wende brief filed by Mor a le z ’s counsel does not draw our attention

to any issues under Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, 744. Morale z

was appr ised of his right to file a supplemental brief, but he failed to file

anything. Following Wende guidelines, we have conducted an independent

review of the record summarized above and conclude there are no meritorious

issues to be argued on appeal.

DISPOSITION

Morale z ’s judgment of conviction, sentence, and all orders entered by

the trial court in these proceedings are affirmed.

STREETER, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

TUCHER, J. BROWN J.
Opinion issued October 30, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00778-CV

———————————

MATT SINK, Appellant

v.

INROCK DRILLING SYSTEMS, INC. and INROCK ACQUISITIONS, INC. 

D/B/A INROCK MANUFACTURING, Appellees

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2014-40091

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued. 

More than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). 
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle
§ 825.212 Employee failure to pay health plan premium payments. ( a ) ( 1 ) In the absence of an established employer policy providing a longer grace period, an employer's obligations to maintain health insurance coverage cease under FMLA if an employee's premium payment is more than 30 days late. In order to drop the coverage for an employee whose premium payment is late, the employer must provide written notice to the employee that the payment has not been received. Such notice must be mailed to the employee at least 15 days before coverage is to cease, advising that coverage will be dropped on a specified date at least 15 days after the date of the letter unless the payment has been received by that date. If the employer has established policies regarding other forms of unpaid leave that provide for the employer to cease coverage retroactively to the date the unpaid premium payment was due, the employer may drop the employee from coverage retroactively in accordance with that policy, provided the 15-day notice was given. In the absence of such a policy, coverage for the employee may be terminated at the end of the 30-day grace period, where the required 15-day notice has been provided.
( 2 ) An employer has no obligation regarding the maintenance of a health insurance policy which is not a group health plan. *See* § 825.209(a).
( 3 ) All other obligations of an employer under FMLA would continue; for example, the employer continues to have an obligation to reinstate an employee upon return from leave.
( b ) The employer may recover the employee's share of any premium payments missed by the employee for any FMLA leave period during which the employer maintains health coverage by paying the employee's share after the premium payment is missed.
( c ) If coverage lapses because an employee has not made required premium payments, upon the employee's return from FMLA leave the employer must still restore the employee to coverage/benefits equivalent to those the employee would have had if leave had not been taken and the premium payment(s) had not been missed, including family or dependent coverage. *See* § 825.215(d)(1)-(5). In such case, an employee may not be required to meet any qualification requirements imposed by the plan, including any new preexisting condition waiting period, to wait for an open season, or to pass a medical examination to obtain reinstatement of coverage. If an employer terminates an employee's insurance in accordance with this section and fails to restore the employee's health insurance as required by this section upon the employee's return, the employer may be liable for benefits lost by reason of the violation, for other actual monetary losses sustained as a direct result of the violation, and for appropriate equitable relief tailored to the harm suffered.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn improved Newton iteration for the generalized inverse of a matrix, with applicationsThe purpose here is to clarify and illustrate the potential for the use of variants of Newton's method of solving problems of practical interest on highly personal computers. The authors show how to accelerate the method substantially and how to modify it successfully to cope with ill-conditioned matrices. The authors conclude that Newton's method can be of value for some interesting computations, especially in parallel and other computing environments in which matrix products are especially easy to work with.Document ID19920002505Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPan, Victor*(State Univ. of New York Albany., United States)*Schreiber, Robert*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186983RIACS-TR-90-16NASA-CR-186983Accession Number92N11723Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DAAL03-86-K-0112CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF CCR-88-05782CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387CONTRACT_GRANT: N00014-86-K-0610Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002505.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Rhode Island Parent Information Network

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2022, effective May 1, 2022

Goals 

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Develop or expand capacity to 

significantly increase the number of 

older adults and adults with disabilities, 

particularly those in underserved 

areas/populations, who participate in 

evidence-based chronic disease selfmanagement education and selfmanagement support programs to 

empower them to better manage their 

chronic conditions.

• Goal 2: Enhance the sustainability of 

evidence-based chronic disease selfmanagement education and selfmanagement support programs 

through the implementation of robust 

sustainability strategies.

Strategies and Activities

RIPIN (Rhode Island Parent Information 

Network) and its partners will: 

• Pilot a Medicaid billing model utilizing 

Community Health Workers (CHW) to 

deliver Chronic Disease SelfManagement and Chronic Pain SelfManagement. 

• Engage Medicaid and Medicare eligible 

Rhode Islanders living in urban core 

communities of Providence, 

Woonsocket, Pawtucket and Central 

Falls.

• Assist trained leaders in achieving 

Community Health Worker Certification 

(CHW).

• Cross-train RIPIN and Prospect CHW 

staff in CDSMP and CPSMP.

• Develop HIPAA (Health Insurance 

Portability Accountability Act) 

compliant registration system.

• Enroll as a Medicaid supplier with the 

State of Rhode Island.

• Develop marketing and outreach 

strategy targeting 400 Providers and 

3,000 consumers.

• Implement Plan-Do-Study Act (PDSA) 

cycles for continuous improvement

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program (CDSMP)
2 of 2

• Chronic Pain Self-Management Program 

(CPSMP)

• Walk with Ease (WWE)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, RIPIN will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• AgeSpan

• Own Your Health Collaborative

• Progreso Latino

• Prospect Health Systems

• RI Department of Health

• RI Executive Office of Health and 

Human Services

• RI Geriatric Education Center

• RI Office of Healthy Aging

Anticipated Results 

RIPIN and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Engage 1,350 participants in SelfManagement workshops (CDSMP, 

CPSMP).

• Achieve 78% participant completion 

rate in CDSMP and CPSMP. 

• Receive reimbursement from Medicaid 

for 75% of workshops by year 3

• Deliver 10% of workshops in Spanish

• Decrease total cost of care, ED 

(emergency departments) use and 

inpatient days related to the chronic 

disease triggering condition for 10% of 

Prospect participants

• Increase by 10% Prospect participants 

connected to primary care

Contact:

Nancy Silva

RIPIN

silva@ripin.org

http://ripin.org/chn

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Anthony McClenton, Respondent.

Decided May 7, 1996

Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

August 30, 2016 Session

IN RE ADONNIAS P. ET AL.

Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Knox County

No. 50970 Timothy E. Irwin, Judge

No. E2016-01102-COA-R3-PT-FILED-AUGUST 30, 2016

The Notice of Appeal in this termination of parental rights case was filed pro se by the 

appellant/mother on May 26, 2016. In it, she indicates her desire to appeal from a final 

judgment entered on May 5, 2015. Because the Notice of Appeal was not timely filed, we 

lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. 

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., AND CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J.

Holly P., Lenoir City, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter, and Martha A. Campbell, Assistant 

Attorney General, General Civil Division, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of 

Children=s Services.

Katheryn Kristina Murray Ogle, Knoxville, Tennessee, Guardian Ad Litem.
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Before transmission of the record for this appeal, the Court directed the pro se

appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction 

based upon the untimely filing of the Notice of Appeal. In that order, the Court noted that a 

timely appeal from the Trial Court’s final order in the proceedings below already had been

dismissed by unpublished order. See In Re Adonnias P., et al., No. E2015-01751-COA-R3-

PT, order (Tenn. Ct. App., filed Feb. 23, 2016). The appellant has filed no response to the 

Court’s show cause order.

In order to be timely, a notice of appeal must “be filed with and received by the clerk 

of the trial court within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from.” 

Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a). “The thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory 

and jurisdictional in civil cases.” Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004). 

Because the Notice of Appeal in this case was not filed until more than a year after the 

judgment to which it is directed, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. This appeal is 

dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Holly P., for which execution may 

issue if necessary. 

PER CURIAM

 

1Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may 

affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum 

opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a 

case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated 

“MEMORANDUM OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be 

cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case.
TICK SEGERBLOM 

SENATOR 

District No. 3 

DISTRICT OFFICE: 

700 South Third Street 

Las Vegas. Nevada 89101-6703 

Office: (702) 388-9600 

Fax No.: (702) 385-2909 

Emmt: rsegerblom~lvcoxmall.com 

~tate nf Neua~a 

~enate 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue Southeast 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

April 28, 2015 

LEGISLATIVE BUILDING: 

401 South Carson Street 

Carson C1ty, Nevada 89701-4747 

Office: (775) 684-1422 or 

(775) 684-1400 

Fax No.: (775) 684-6522 

Ema1t: nck.Segcrbtoml(!)sen.state.nv.us 

www.teg.state.nv.us 

As the State Senator representing Nevada's Third Senate District, with one of the world's 

busiest airports, McCarran International Airport, right next door, I am acutely aware of the 

benefits Open Skies policy has brought my constituents, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area, and 

the United States as a whole. Open Skies encouraged healthy competition between airlines, 

increased air'travel, and helped invigorate the economy. I am writing, however, _to express my 

deep concern over three government-owned airlines from the Persian_ Gulf states who are 

threatening to upset this balance by taking advantage of Open Skies and receiving tens of 

billions of dollars of illegitimate financial support from their host governments. 

Over the last ten years, the three Gulf carriers, Emirates, Etihad Airways, and Qatar Airways, 

have collectively been given at least $42 billion in subsidies and other unfair benefits from 

Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in violation of Open Skies policy. Without action 

by the U.S., this uneven playing field will continue to force U.S. carriers to shut down 

previously profitable international routes. This will result in substantial losses of good, 

well-paying, American jobs in the many industries that support aviation. 

I strongly support competition among airlines, but it is has to be fair. The actions by Qatar 

and the UAE have distorted the market and given the three Gulf carriers a massive advantage 

over their competitors. Therefore, as provided by the Open Skies agreements, I am requesting 

that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the UAE to ·address these 

developments and seek a freeze on new capacity from the Gulf carriers to the U.S. while the 

negotiations ·go forward . 

S10-150504-V14 .. . ~ ' • t: te John F. Kerry 

S~ly, 

Tick Segerblom 

Nevada State Senator 
8tate nf Neualla 8cnate 

TICK SEGERBLOM 

Senator 

700 South Third Street 

Las Vegas, NV 89101-6703 

s 10-150504-014 

THE HONORABLE ANTHONY R. FOXX 

SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

Hasler 

04/2812C15 

11~1:t•1.i WI =I 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

1200 NEW JERSEY A VENUE SOUTHEAST 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

10 ST -CLASS MAIL 

$00.482. 

ZIP 89701 

o~ 10126020.56 

1, t11 , nl• JIIII11 11JIJ11, 1, 1.1, 11, 111J•IIuJ 11 , Jtl •I ,J,, 111, 1Jj,
(77 South. 1002)

#### ANTHONY v. STATE.

(2 Div. 163.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 26, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; H. B. Poster, Judge.

Harwood, McKinley, McQueen & Aldridge, of Eutaw, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, J.

Appeal abated by death of appellant.
§ 93.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.