alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<MULTIPLIER>                                                                 1


<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                 474,159
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          901,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            28,906
<INVENTORY>                                                          1,998,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     3,851,785
<PP&E>                                                               3,057,476
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       1,429,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        7,984,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 1,780,520
<BONDS>                                                                  51,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                  1,364
<OTHER-SE>                                                            5,952,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          7,984,542
<SALES>                                                               6,143,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      6,602,213
<CGS>                                                                 5,283,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         5,283,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (3,433,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             16,022
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (3,449,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            (25.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (25.76)


</TABLE>
#### § 110.40 Silver Beach Harbor, North Falmouth, Mass.

All the waters of the harbor northward of the inner end of the entrance channel.
January 2011 Page 1 of 2

Khat (pronounced “cot”) is a stimulant drug 

derived from a shrub (Catha edulis) that is 

native to East Africa and southern Arabia. 

The khat plant itself is not scheduled under 

the Controlled Substances Act; however, 

because one of its chemical constituents, 

cathinone, is a Schedule I drug, the Federal 

Government considers its use illegal.1

Health/Behavioral Effects

The main psychoactive ingredients in khat 

are cathine and cathinone, chemicals that 

are structurally similar to, but less potent 

than, amphetamine, yet result in similar 

psychomotor stimulant effects. Chewing 

khat leaves can induce a state of euphoria 

and elation as well as feelings of increased 

alertness and arousal. The user can also 

experience an increase in blood pressure 

and heart rate. The effects begin to subside 

after about 90 minutes to 3 hours, but can 

last 24 hours. At the end of a khat session, 

the user may experience a depressive mood, 

irritability, loss of appetite, and difficulty 

sleeping.1

There are a number of adverse physical 

effects that have been associated with 

heavy or long-term use of khat, including 

tooth decay and periodontal disease; 

gastrointestinal disorders such as constipation, 

ulcers, inflammation of the stomach, and 

increased risk of upper gastrointestinal 

tumors; and cardiovascular disorders such 

as irregular heartbeat, decreased blood 

flow, and myocardial infarction. There is 

also consistent epidemiologic evidence for a 

weak association between chronic khat use 

and mental disorders. Although there is no 

evidence that khat use causes mental illness, 

chewing khat leaves may worsen symptoms 

in patients who have pre-existing psychiatric 

conditions.

It is unclear whether khat causes tolerance, 

physical dependency, addiction, or 

withdrawal, but nightmares and slight 

trembling have been reported several days 

after ceasing to chew.

Extent of Use

It is estimated that as many as 10 million 

people worldwide chew khat.2 It is commonly 

found in the southwestern part of the Arabian 

Peninsula and in East Africa, where it 

has been used for centuries as part of an 

established cultural tradition. In one large 

study in Yemen, 82 percent of men and 43 

percent of women reported at least one 

lifetime* episode of khat use.2 Its current 

Khat
January 2011 Page 2 of 2

Other Information Sources

For street terms searchable by drug name, 

street term, cost and quantities, drug trade, 

and drug use, visit: www.usdoj.gov/

dea/concern/k.html.

Notes

* “Lifetime” refers to use at least once during a respondent’s lifetime.

References

1 Drug Enforcement Administration. Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/pressrel/pr072606a.html

2 World Health Organization Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. Critical Review of Khat. 

Available at: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/4.4KhatCritReview.pdf.

use among particular migrant communities in 

the United States and in Europe has caused 

alarm among policymakers and health 

care professionals. No reliable estimates of 

prevalence in the United States exist.
#### § 794.135 Employees who are exempt.

If an enterprise engaged in distribution of petroleum products satisfies all the conditions specified in section 7(b)(3) as previously discussed, the partial exemption provided by this section from the Act's general overtime pay requirements will be applicable to all employees employed by their employer in activities of the enterprise for which the exemption was intended if, but only if, such employees are compensated in accordance with the compensation requirements of section 7(b)(3) (see § 794.100).
#### § 94.220 By when must I publish my drug-free workplace statement and establish my drug-free awareness program?

If you are a new recipient that does not already have a policy statement as described in § 94.205 and an ongoing awareness program as described in § 94.215, you must publish the statement and establish the program by the time given in the following table:

| If . . . | then you . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) The performance period of the award is less than 30 days | must have the policy statement and program in place as soon as possible, but before the date on which performance is expected to be completed. |
| (b) The performance period of the award is 30 days or more | must have the policy statement and program in place within 30 days after award. |
| (c) You believe there are extraordinary circumstances that will require more than 30 days for you to publish the policy statement and establish the awareness program | may ask the Department of Labor awarding official to give you more time to do so. The amount of additional time, if any, to be given is at the discretion of the awarding official. |
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 16, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 16, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0212. COBRA 4 ENTERPRISES INC v. KAREN POWELL-NEWMAN et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

13A47221
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-36,960 et al.]


CNG Transmission Corp. Clarksburg, West Virginia, et al.; 
Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at CNG Transmission Corp., 
Clarksburg, West Virginia, Hope Gas, Inc., Clarksburg, West Virginia, 
East Ohio Gas, Cleveland, Ohio, Virginia Natural Gas, Norfolk, 
Virginia, CNG Producing Co., New Orleans, Louisiana, Peoples Natural 
Gas Co., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, CNG Cooperate, Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania. The application contained no new substantial information 
which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. 
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-36,960; CNG Transmission Corp., Clarksburg, West Virginia
TA-W-36,960A; Hope Gas, Inc., Clarksburg, West Virginia
TA-W-36,960B; East Ohio Gas, Cleveland, Ohio
TA-W-36,960C; Virginia Natural Gas, Norfolk, Virginia
TA-W-36,960D; CNG Producing Co., New Orleans, Louisiana
TA-W-36,960E; Peoples Natural Gas Co., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
TA-W-36,960F; CNG Corporate, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (May 18, 2000)


    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of May, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-13475 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13513]

[[Page 34629]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Parts 2930, 3800, 8340, 8370, 8560, and 9260

[WO-250-1220-PA-24 1A]
RIN 1004-AD25

Permits for Recreation on Public Lands; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published in the Federal 
Register of May 16, 2000 (65 FR 31234), a proposed rule on permits for 
recreation on public lands. In the Preamble of the proposed rule, a 
section number conversion table inadvertently listed several incorrect 
new section numbers. This document corrects those numbers.

DATES: The public comment period on the proposed rule ends on July 17, 
2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Larson at (202) 452-5168 as to the 
substance of the proposed rule, or Ted Hudson at (202) 452-5042 as to 
procedural matters. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may contact either individual by calling the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 
days a week.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
published in the Federal Register of May 16, 2000 (65 FR 31234), a 
proposed rule on permits for recreation on public lands. In the 
Preamble of the proposed rule, the section number conversion table on 
page 31235 inadvertently listed several incorrect new section numbers. 
To make the proposed rule clearer, we need to correct those numbers.
    In proposed rule FR Doc. 00-12124, published on May 16, 2000 (65 FR 
31234), make the following corrections. On page 31235, in the first 
column, in the Section Conversion Table, for the following old section 
numbers, the correct new section numbers are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Old section                          New section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                *         *         *         *         *
Sec.  8372.2(a)...........................  Sec.  2932.24(a)(1) and (2).
Sec.  8372.2(b)...........................  Sec.  2932.24(a)(3).
 
                *         *         *         *         *
Sec.  8372.5(a)(1)........................  Sec.  2932.56(a), 2933.32.
 
                *         *         *         *         *
Sec.  8372.5(f)...........................  Sec.  2932.56(b)(2).
 
                *         *         *         *         *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michael H. Schwartz,
Group Manager, Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-13513 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.120 Contracts for public utility services.

The Act, in paragraph (5) of section 7, exempts from its provisions “any contract for public utility services, including electric light and power, water, steam, and gas.” This exemption is applicable to contracts for such services with companies whose rates therefor are regulated under State, local, or Federal law governing operations of public utility enterprises. Contracts entered into with public utility companies to furnish services through the use of service employees, other than those subject to such rate regulation, are not exempt from the Act. Among the contracts included in the exemption would be those between Federal electric power marketing agencies and investor-owned electric utilities, Rural Electrification Administration cooperatives, municipalities and State agencies engaged in the transmission and sale of electric power and energy.

(See H. Rept. No. 948, 89th Cong., 1st sess., p. 4)
EX-10.38




 Exhibit 10.38 
  

					
			



		  
 Houston Technology Center

Suite 325
 410 Pierce
Street
 Houston, TX 77002

			 Phone: 832-431-3555

Fax: 858-756-0482
		

 March 31, 2015 
 Nicholas Puro,
JD 
  

	Re:	First Amendment to Consulting Letter dated April 2, 2014 (the “Consulting Letter”) 

 Dear Mr.
Puro: 
 Both you and MultiVir Inc. (the “Company”) acknowledge that a Trigger Event as defined in the Consulting Letter
has not been completed as of March 31, 2015. In that regard, both you and the Company agree that the second full paragraph of page 2 of the Consulting Letter shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

If the Company does not complete a Trigger Event on or before June 30, 2015, this Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2015;
provided, however, that this agreement shall continue after June 30, 2015 unless terminated upon 30-days prior written notice by either party. 

Except as expressly amended hereby the terms and conditions of the Consulting Letter shall remain in full force and effect. Kindly
countersign a copy of this letter and return it to me to evidence your acceptance of this amendment. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MultiVir, Inc.
		
	By:		  /s/ Robert E. Sobol, MD

	Name:		Robert E. Sobol, MD
	Title:		Chief Executive Officer


  

	
	Agreed and Consented to:
	
	  /s/ Nicholas Puro, JD

	Print Name: Nicholas Puro, JD
#### § 810.1 Introduction.

This part provides the Department of Labor's rules to implement and administer the high-wage components of the labor value content requirements, as provided in the Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada, and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 419 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 419

    Honoring the life and extraordinary contributions of Diane Wolf.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2008

  Mr. Stevens (for himself, Mr. Byrd, and Mr. Coleman) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Honoring the life and extraordinary contributions of Diane Wolf.

Whereas the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep regret of the 
        untimely death of Diane Wolf, a member of the Senate Preservation Board 
        of Trustees and a former distinguished member of the United States 
        Commission of Fine Arts; and
Whereas for over 2 decades Diane Wolf devoted extraordinary personal efforts to 
        and displayed great passion for the preservation and restoration of the 
        United States Capitol Building, and was singularly instrumental in 
        supporting and guiding the early efforts of the United States Capitol 
        Preservation Commission and developing the plans for striking the coins 
        commemorating the Bicentennial of the United States Capitol: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the life and extraordinary contributions of 
        Diane Wolf;
            (2) conveys its sorrow and deepest condolences to the 
        family of Diane Wolf on her untimely death; and
            (3) requests the Secretary of the Senate to convey an 
        enrolled copy of this resolution to the family of Diane Wolf.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.161 Honker Cut.

The draw of the San Joaquin County (Eightmile Road) bridge, mile 0.3 between Empire Tract and King Island at Stockton, shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given to the San Joaquin County Department of Public Works at Stockton.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 153 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 153

    Making temporary appointments to the Select Committee on Ethics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2007

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Making temporary appointments to the Select Committee on Ethics.

    Resolved, That (a) for matters before the Select Committee on 
Ethics involving the preliminary inquiry arising in connection with 
alleged communications by persons within the committee's jurisdiction 
with and concerning David C. Iglesias, then United States Attorney for 
the District of New Mexico, and subsequent action by the committee with 
respect to that matter, if any, the Senator from Colorado (Mr. Salazar) 
shall be replaced by the Senator from Ohio (Mr. Brown).
     (b) The membership of the Select Committee on Ethics shall be 
unchanged with respect to all matters before that committee other than 
the matter referred to in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A0016. JOHNNIE MARENE THOMAS v. ALVIN THOMAS.

Alvin Thomas owned at least three parcels of real property in the metropolitan

Atlanta area, including one located on Cascade Road, one located on Willis Mill

Road, and one located on Singleton Road. While Alvin was serving a prison term, he

gave his sister, Johnnie Marene Thomas, power of attorney to manage his affairs.

Without Alvin’s knowledge or consent, Johnnie used this power of attorney to

transfer the Cascade Road and Willis Mill properties to her or to entities she

controlled. Johnnie also failed to use Alvin’s assets as he directed to pay the mortgage

on the Singleton Road property, resulting in that property’s foreclosure.

After Johnnie refused to return title to the Cascade and Willis Mill properties

to Alvin, he filed suit. The complaint sought return of those properties to Alvin,

damages resulting from the foreclosure on the Singleton property, an accounting of

the rental and other income generated by Alvin’s properties, and attorney fees.

1 On

April 6, 2022, Alvin moved for entry of an order conveying the Willis Mill property

back to him. After Johnnie failed to file a response, the trial court granted the motion

and entered an order on June 2, 2022 transferring the Willis Mill property to Alvin.

On July 7, 2022, Johnnie filed this direct appeal from that order. We lack jurisdiction.

“Generally, an order isfinal and appealable when it leaves no issuesremaining

to be resolved, constitutes the court’s final ruling on the merits of the action, and

leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court.” State v. White, 354 Ga.

App. 214, 215 (840 SE2d 697) (2020) (punctuation omitted). See also OCGA §

1

 Alvin sought attorney fees under OCGA § 13-6-11.

August 05, 2022
5-6-34 (a). The order that Johnnie seeks to appeal is not final, as the case remains

pending below. Accordingly, Johnnie wasrequired to follow the interlocutory appeal

procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832,

832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Pace Construction Corp. v. Northpark Assoc., 215

Ga. App. 438, 439-440 (450 SE2d 828) (1994). Her failure to do so deprives this

Court of jurisdiction. Eidson v. Croutch, 337 Ga. App. 542, 543 (788 SE2d 129)

(2016). See also Islamkhan v. Khan, 299 Ga. 548, 551 (2) (787 SE2d 731) (2016).

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.2

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2 We note that even if the order at issue was final, Johnnie’s appeal would be

untimely because it was not filed within 30 days of the entry of the order. See OCGA

§ 5-6-38 (a).

08/05/2022