alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol Federal Financial (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, John B. Dicus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Neil F. M. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such Report.







Date:   August 4, 2005                                    By:   /s/ John B. Dicus
                                                                                     John B. Dicus, President and 
                                                                                     Chief Executive Officer



Date:   August 4, 2005                                   By:   /s/ Neil F. M. McKay
                                                                                     Neil F.M. McKay, Executive Vice President
                                                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 2 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 3 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 4 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 5 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 6 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 7 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 8 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 9 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 10 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 11 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 12 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 13 of 14Case 2:10-cv-01919-TSZ Document 175 Filed 08/15/14 Page 14 of 14
§ 106.400 General. ( a ) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the FSO develops and implements a Facility Security Plan (FSP) for each OCS facility for which he or she is designated as FSO. The FSP: ( 1 ) Must identify the FSO by name or position and provide 24-hour contact information;
( 2 ) Must be written in English;
( 3 ) Must address each vulnerability identified in the Facility Security Assessment (FSA);
( 4 ) Must describe security measures for each MARSEC Level; and
( 5 ) May cover more than one OCS facility to the extent that they share similarities in physical characteristics and operations, if authorized and approved by the cognizant District Commander.
( b ) The FSP must be submitted for approval to the cognizant District Commander in a written or electronic format in a manner prescribed by the cognizant District Commander.
( c ) The FSP is sensitive security information and must be protected in accordance with 49 CFR part 1520.
( d ) If the FSP is kept in an electronic format, procedures must be in place to prevent its unauthorized deletion, destruction, or amendment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         287,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  365,989<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,744
<INVENTORY>                                    175,763<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               862,870
<PP&E>                                         478,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 221,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,300,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          383,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,979
<OTHER-SE>                                     887,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,300,587
<SALES>                                      1,379,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,379,678
<CGS>                                          736,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  736,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               417,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                225,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                    79,007
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            146,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   146,727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT IS NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBTS AND RETURNS AND ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AMOUNT IS NET OF OBSOLESCENCE RESERVES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
132 STAT. 3660 PUBLIC LAW 115–257—OCT. 9, 2018 

Public Law 115–257 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to provide additional 

resources to State and local prosecutors, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice Served Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROSECUTION OF DNA COLD CASES. 

(a) DEBBIE SMITH DNA BACKLOG GRANT PROGRAM.—Section 

2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 

40701) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(9) To increase the capacity of State and local prosecution 

offices to address the backlog of violent crime cases in which 

suspects have been identified through DNA evidence.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(5) ALLOCATION OF GRANT AWARDS FOR PROSECUTORS.— 

For each fiscal year, not less than 5 percent, but not more 

than 7 percent, of the grant amounts distributed under paragraph (1) shall, if sufficient applications to justify such amounts 

are received by the Attorney General, be awarded for purposes 

described in subsection (a)(9), provided that none of the funds 

required to be distributed under this paragraph shall decrease 

or otherwise limit the availability of funds required to be 

awarded to States or units of local government under paragraph 

(3).’’. 

(b) PROSECUTION OF COLD CASES.—Of the amounts made available to the Attorney General for a DNA Analysis and capacity 

enhancement program and for other local, State, and Federal 

forensic activities for the purpose described in section 2 of the 

DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) 

under the heading ‘‘STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE’’ under the heading ‘‘OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS’’ under 

the heading ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’’ in fiscal years 2019, 

2020, 2021, and 2022, not less than 5 percent, but not more than 

7 percent, of such amounts shall be provided for grants for prosecutors to increase the capacity of State and local prosecution offices 

Grants. 

34 USC 10101 

note. 

Justice Served 

Act of 2018. 

Oct. 9, 2018 

[H.R. 4854] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–257—OCT. 9, 2018 132 STAT. 3661 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4854: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

May 15, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

to address cold cases involving violent crime, where suspects have 

been identified through DNA evidence. 

Approved October 9, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
ex10.17

 

 Exhibit 10.17
 

 

 LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 $200,000 Date: December 1, 2010
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Entest Biomedical Inc., ("Borrower") promises to pay to the order of David Koos ("Lender") the principal sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000), or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit of the Borrower by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It is the intent of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create a line of credit agreement between Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may borrow up to $ 200,000 from Lender. This agreement shall also be the terms and conditions of any and all borrowed amounts outstanding as of this date.
 

 INTEREST & PRINCIPAL: The unpaid principal of this line of credit shall bear simple interest at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated based on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances or payments made hereunder. Principal balance and accrued interest shall become due and payable in whole or in part at the demand of the Lender.
 

 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BORROWER
 

 Borrower  (a) is a corporation duly formed, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Nevada  and (b) has all requisite power and authority, and has all governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals necessary to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
 

 None of the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Borrower, or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby (a) constitute or will constitute a violation of the organizational documents of Borrower, (b) constitutes or will constitute a breach or violation of, or a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute such a default) under, any indenture, mortgage, deed of Borrower, loan agreement, lease or other agreement or instrument to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrower or any of its properties may be bound.
 

 BORROWER:
 

 By: /s/ David Koos
 

 Its:CEO
§ 106.405 Format and content of the Facility Security Plan (FSP). ( a ) An OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the FSP consists of the individual sections listed in this paragraph (a). If the FSP does not follow the order as it appears in this paragraph, the OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the FSP contains an index identifying the location of each of the following sections: ( 1 ) Security organization of the OCS facility;
( 2 ) Personnel training;
( 3 ) Drills and exercises;
( 4 ) Records and documentation;
( 5 ) Response to change in MARSEC Level;
( 6 ) Procedures for interfacing with vessels;
( 7 ) Declaration of Security (DoS);
( 8 ) Communications;
( 9 ) Security systems and equipment maintenance;
( 10 ) Security measures for access control, including the OCS facility's TWIC Program;
( 11 ) Security measures for restricted areas;
( 12 ) Security measures for delivery of stores and industrial supplies;
( 13 ) Security measures for monitoring;
( 14 ) Security incident procedures;
( 15 ) Audits and FSP amendments; and
( 16 ) Facility Security Assessment (FSA) report.
( b ) The FSP must describe in detail how the requirements of subpart B of this part will be met.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003; 68 FR 41917, July 16, 2003, as amended by USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 3587, Jan. 25, 2007; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016]
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1  The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Morton Industrial Group, Inc.: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-68927
and 333-69575) on Form S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our report dated March 24,
2005 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows and the financial statement
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which
report appears in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Morton Industrial
Group, Inc. Our report refers to a change in accounting for goodwill amortization and
impairment in 2002. Indianapolis, Indiana
March 25, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010.

2. At 89 FR 22946, Apr. 3, 2024, part 1 was amended by revising the authority citation; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### § 1.01-40 Delegation to the Vice Commandant.

The Commandant delegates to the Vice Commandant authority to take final agency action under 46 CFR part 5, Subparts I, J and K on each petition to reopen a hearing and on each appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge, except on petition or appeal in a case in which an order of revocation has been issued. This delegation does not prevent the Vice Commandant from acting as Commandant, as prescribed in 14 U.S.C. 304, for all purposes of 46 CFR part 5.

[CGD 85-071, 51 FR 22805, June 23, 1986, as amended by CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33361, June 19, 1997; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58275, Sept. 18, 2020]
**Exhibit 3.3**

** **

**SENIOR HOUSINGPROPERTIES TRUST**

 

**CERTIFICATE OFCORRECTION**

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:

 

FIRST: The title of the document being corrected is Articles Supplementary (the“Articles”).

 

SECOND: The sole party to the Articles is Senior Housing Properties Trust, aMaryland real estate investment trust (the “Trust”).

 

THIRD: The Articles were filed with the State Department of Assessments andTaxation of Maryland (“SDAT”) on March 15, 2004.

 

FOURTH: The provisions of the Articles which are to be corrected and aspreviously filed with SDAT are set forth below.

 

1.  Paragraph 1 of the Articles currently readsas follows:

 

“1.   Designation andAmount.  The shares of such series shallbe designated as “Junior Participating Preferred Shares” and the number ofshares constituting such series shall be 1,000,000.”

 

2.  The paragraph which immediately precedes theexecution of the Articles currently reads as follows:

 

“IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST has caused theseArticles Supplementary to be signed in its name and on its behalf by a majorityof its entire Board of Trustees and witnessed by its Secretary on March 10,2004.”

 

FIFTH: The provisions of the Articles as corrected hereby are set forth below.

 

1.  Paragraph 1 of the Articles shall read asfollows:

 

“1.   Designation andAmount.  The shares of such series shallbe designated as “Junior Participating Preferred Shares” and the number ofshares constituting such series shall be 300,000.”

 

----

 

2.  The paragraph which immediately precedes theexecution of the Articles shall read as follows:

 

“IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trust has caused these Articles Supplementaryto be signed in its name and on its behalf by its President and attested to byits Assistant Secretary on March 10, 2004.”

 

SIXTH: The undersigned President of the Trust acknowledges this Certificate ofCorrection to be the trust act of the Trust and, as to all matters or factsrequired to be verified under oath, the undersigned President acknowledgesthat, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters andfacts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made underthe penalties for perjury.

 

 

[SIGNATUREPAGE FOLLOWS]

 

----

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the Trust has caused this Certificate of Correction to be signed inits name and on its behalf by its President and attested to by its AssistantSecretary on this 29th day of March, 2004.

 

 
| ATTEST:                | SENIOR  HOUSING  PROPERTIES TRUST |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                   |                              |
|                   |                              |
| /s/ Jennifer  B. Clark |                              | By: | /s/ David J.  Hegarty | (SEAL) |
| Jennifer B.  Clark     |                              | David J.  Hegarty |
| Assistant  Secretary   |                              | President |
|                        |                                   |  |  |  |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6571

TYRONE LORENZO ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Highway Patrol;

JOSEPH FRANKLIN CLIPSE, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (2:06-cv-01288-SB)

Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: June 10, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges

Waldron, Jr., CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bluffton, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson appeals the district court’s

orders granting summary judgment in Defendants’ favor in this

action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and denying Robinson’s

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Robinson v. S.C. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No.

2:06-cv-01288-SB (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2007; Nov. 5, 2007). We deny

Robinson’s motions for default judgment and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 788.6 Scope of the section 13(a)(13) exemption.

Employees will not be held exempt under section 13(a)(13) unless they are clearly shown to come within its terms. (*Wirtz* v. *F. M. Sloan Co.,* 4ll F. 2d 56 (C.A. 3), 18 WH Cases 878; *Gatlin Lumber Co.* v. *Mitchell,* 287 F. 2d 76 (C.A. 5) cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963.) By its terms, the exemption is limited to those employed in the named operations by an employer who employs not more than eight employees therein. The named operations are described in terms of ordinary speech and mean what they mean in ordinary intercourse in this context. These operations include the incidental activities normally performed by persons employed in them, but do not include mill operations.
§ 801.61 Designation of record. ( a ) Each administrative proceeding instituted under the Act and this part shall be identified of record by a number preceded by the year and the letters “EPPA”.
( b ) The number, letter, and designation assigned to each such proceeding shall be clearly displayed on each pleading, motion, brief, or other formal document filed and docketed of record.
(77 South. 922)

#### BATSON et al. v. KELLER.

(6 Div. 440.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 22, 1918.)

Appeal and Error <&wkey;671(l) — Affirmance —Deficient Record.

In the absence of bill of exceptions or assignments of error, as required by law, the judgment may be affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John H. Miller, Judge.

Action by A. Keller against T. J. Batson and the American Surety Company of New York. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal, and plaintiff moves to affirm.

Motion granted, and judgment affirmed.

Burgin & Brown, of Birmingham, for appellants. Hugh H. Ellis, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BRICKEN, J.

This .action for damages is based upon an alleged wrongful and unlawful search of the plaintiff’s premises by the sheriff of lefferson county, Ala., through his deputies Smith and Cole. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendant sheriff and his official bond, this appeal is taken, and is here submitted upon motion to affirm. There is no bill of exceptions, and no errors are assigned as required by law. The motion is granted, and the judgment of the lower court is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### §§ 100.50-100.99 [Reserved]
792 A.2d 590

#### In the Matter of Mark Anthony DESIMONE.

No. 719 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Jan. 31, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 28, 2001, pursuant to *81Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Mark Anthony DeSimone to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Mark Anthony DeSimone is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                  and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**L.        J. MCLAUGHLIN**