alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 570.117 General. ( a ) Section 3(1) of the Act defines “oppressive child labor” as follows: *Oppressive child labor* means a condition of employment under which (1) any employee under the age of sixteen years is employed by an employer (other than a parent or a person standing in place of a parent employing his own child or a child in his custody under the age of sixteen years in an occupation other than manufacturing or mining or an occupation found by the Secretary of Labor to be particularly hazardous for the employment of children between the ages of sixteen and eighteen years or detrimental to their health or well-being) in any occupation, or (2) any employee between the ages of sixteen and eighteen years is employed by an employer in any occupation which the Secretary of Labor shall find and by order declare to be particularly hazardous for the employment of children between such ages or detrimental to their health or well-being, but oppressive child labor shall not be deemed to exist by virtue of the employment in any occupation of any person with respect to whom the employer shall have on file an unexpired certificate issued and held pursuant to regulations of the Secretary of Labor certifying that such person is above the oppressive child labor age. The Secretary of Labor shall provide by regulation or by order that the employment of employees between the ages of fourteen and sixteen years in occupations other than manufacturing and mining shall not be deemed to constitute oppressive child labor if and to the extent that the Secretary of Labor determines that such employment is confined to periods which will not interfere with their schooling and to conditions which will not interfere with their health and well-being.
( b ) It will be noted that the term includes generally the employment of young workers under the age of 16 years in any occupation. In addition, the term includes employment of minors 16 and 17 years of age by an employer in any occupation which the Secretary finds and declares to be particularly hazardous for the employment of children of such ages or detrimental to their health or well-being. Authority is also given the Secretary to issue orders or regulations permitting the employment of children 14 and 15 years of age in nonmanufacturing and nonmining occupations where he determines that such employment is confined to periods which will not interfere with their schooling and to conditions which will not interfere with their health and well-being. The subsection further provides for the issuance of age certificates pursuant to regulations of the Secretary which will protect an employer from unwitting employment of oppressive child labor.
<PAGE>
                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                 FORM 10-QSB/A
                                Amendment No. 1


[X]   Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

[ ]   Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
      For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

                         Commission file number 0-25675

                              PATRON SYSTEMS, INC.
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

                DELAWARE                                74-3055158
                --------                                ----------
    (State or other jurisdiction of          (IRS Employer Identification No.)
     incorporation or organization)

             311 BELLE FORET DRIVE, SUITE 150, LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044
             ------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (847) 295-7338
                            ------------------------
                           (Issuer's telephone number)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
                          if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [x] No [ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE
PRECEDING FIVE YEARS. Check whether the registrant filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes [ ] No [ ]

As of September 25, 2003, there were 34,931,388 shares of the issuer's common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X]



<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

                                             PATRON SYSTEMS, INC.


Date: October 2, 2003                        /s/ Patrick J. Allin
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Patrick J. Allin
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### ROBERT MESSENGER *v.*BARRY MESSENGER

(AC 18797)

Landau, Hennessy and Mihalakos, Js.

Submitted on briefs December 15, 1999

officially released January 4, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99 (c)


                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                         ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of MCI Communications Corporation

Our audits of the consolidated  financial  statements  referred to in our report
dated April 9, 1998  appearing in Exhibit 13 to this Annual  Report on Form 10-K
(which  report  and  consolidated   financial  statements  are  incorporated  by
reference  in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K) also  included  an audit of the
Financial  Statement  Schedule  in  Exhibit  99 (a) of this  Form  10-K.  In our
opinion,  the Financial  Statement  Schedule  presents  fairly,  in all material
respects,  the information  set forth therein when read in conjunction  with the
related consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP 
April 9, 1998 
Washington, D.C.
§ 4262.5 PBGC review of plan assumptions. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) As set forth in § 4262.3(d)(1), PBGC will accept the assumptions used by a plan to determine eligibility for special financial assistance under § 4262.3(d)(1) unless PBGC determines that such assumptions are clearly erroneous.
( 2 ) PBGC will accept the assumptions used by a plan to determine eligibility for special financial assistance under § 4262.3(d)(2) or to determine the amount of special financial assistance under § 4262.4(e)(3) unless PBGC determines that an assumption is unreasonable.
( 3 ) PBGC will accept a plan's changes in assumptions under paragraph (c) of this section except to the extent that PBGC determines that an assumption is individually unreasonable, or the proposed changed assumptions are unreasonable in the aggregate.
( b ) *Reasonableness of assumptions.* ( 1 ) Each of the actuarial assumptions and methods used for the actuarial projections (excluding the interest rate assumptions under § 4262.4(e)(1) and (2)) must be reasonable in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices, taking into account the experience of the plan and reasonable expectations. The actuary's selection of assumptions about future covered employment and contribution levels (including contribution base units and contribution rates) may be based on information provided by the plan sponsor, which must act in good faith in providing the information.
( 2 ) If a plan has a change in assumptions under paragraph (c) of this section, each of the actuarial assumptions and methods (other than the interest rate assumptions under § 4262.4(e)(1) and (2)) must be reasonable and the combination of those actuarial assumptions and methods (excluding the interest rate assumptions under § 4262.4(e)(1) and (2)) must also be reasonable.
( c ) *Changes in assumptions.* If a plan determines that use of an assumption described in § 4262.3(d)(2) or § 4262.4(e)(3) is unreasonable, the plan's application may include a proposed change in the assumptions (excluding the plan's interest rate assumptions under § 4262.4(e)(1) and (2)). ( 1 ) The application for special financial assistance must— ( i ) Describe why the original assumption is no longer reasonable;
( ii ) Propose to use a different assumption (the changed assumption); and
( iii ) Demonstrate that the changed assumption is reasonable.
( 2 ) PBGC will provide guidelines for changed assumptions on PBGC's website at *www.pbgc.gov .*
#### McCOLGAN v NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO

Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co

No 1760.

Decided April 28, 1930

Davis & Lipps, Akron, for McColgan.

Garfield, Cross, MacGregor, Daoust & Baldwin, Cleveland, and Ormsby, Kennedy & Vogel, Akron, for Ins. Co.

Opinion by

PARDEE, J.

FUNK, PJ. and WASHBURN, J. concur.

SYLLABUS

Where a life insurance policy provides for wáiver of premium in the event the insured is disabled as described in the policy on the day the premium falls due, if timely notice of such fact is given to the company, but is silent as to who shall give the notice, a beneficiary, if the insured dies without giving the notice, may give the same.

Full opinion will be published later. Watch Omnibus Index.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6451

DAVID W. HUGHES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden; RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Director, Virginia Department of Corrections;

GENE H. JOHNSON, Deputy Director, Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-99-2110-1)

Submitted: August 17, 2001 Decided: September 10, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David W. Hughes appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Hughes v. Garraghty, No. CA-99-2110-2

(E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2001; entered Mar. 6, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 											REPORT **

#### 											ABOUT **

#### 											COMMISSIONERS **

#### 											MEETINGS **

#### 											HEARINGS **

#### 											LIBRARY **

#### 											NEWS **

#### 											CONTACT US **

				Skip to main navigation 

CEP

Skip Main NavigationSkip To Navigation Content
                -   REPORT  
                -   ABOUT  
                -   COMMISSIONERS  
                -   MEETINGS  
                -   HEARINGS  
                -   LIBRARY  
                -   NEWS  
                -   CONTACT US  

The Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking (CEP) was established to develop a strategy for increasing the availability and use of data in order to build evidence about government programs, while protecting privacy and confidentiality.
Read More

The Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking sunsets on September 30, 2017. While this website is no longer being updated, it will be available until July 1, 2018.

For updates on related evidence-based policymaking efforts, see the Evidence-Based Policymaking Initiative of the Bipartisan Policy Center at bipartisanpolicy.org/evidence.
                          - CEP Final Report: The Promise of Evidence-Based Policymaking

#### Latest

                -                    -  News 
                  -   
                -                    -  Meetings 
                  -   
                -                    -  Hearings 
                  -   

### 					 	 News						

Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking Releases Final Report					

----

Commission Meeting on March 13					

----

Commission Meeting on February 24					

----

																				View All News																		

### 					 	 Meetings						

Seventh Meeting - March 13, 2017					

----

Sixth Meeting - February 24, 2017					

----

Fifth Meeting - January 13, 2017					

----

																				View All Meetings																		

### 					 	 Hearings						

Third Public Hearing - February 9, 2017					

----

Second Public Hearing - January 5, 2017					

----

Public Hearing - October 21, 2016					

----

Skip to top of page

Privacy Policy

		   Privacy Policy		

				   Privacy Policy				

You are about to leave this web site for a destination outside of the Federal Government. You may wish to review each privacy notice since their information collection practices may differ from ours. In addition, our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products or services.Click OK if you wish to continue to the web site, otherwise click cancel to return to our site.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-920; MM Docket No. 99-103; RM-9506; RM-9829]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Bayfield, CO and Teec Nos Pos, AZ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 223A, in lieu of previously 
proposed Channel 237A, to Bayfield, Colorado, as an additional local FM 
transmission service at that community in response to a petition for 
rule making filed by Mountain West Broadcasting (RM-9506). See 64 FR 
17141, April 8, 1999. Additionally, Channel 237C1 is allotted to Teec 
Nos Pos, Arizona, as that community's first local aural transmission 
service, in response to a counterproposal filed on behalf of Voice 
Ministries of Farmington, Inc. (RM-9829). Coordinates used for Channel 
223A at Bayfield, Colorado, are 37-07-29 NL; 107-34-10 WL; coordinates 
used for Channel 237C1 at Teec Nos Pos, Arizona, are 36-54-36 NL; 109-
06-00 WL.

DATES: Effective June 9, 2000. A filing window period for Channel 223A 
at Bayfield, Colorado, and for Channel 237C1 at Teec Nos Pos, Arizona, 
will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing 
window for those channels will be addressed by the Commission in a 
subsequent Order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180. Questions related to the application filing process should be 
addressed to the Audio Services Division, (202) 418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-103, adopted April 19, 2000, and 
released April 25, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is 
amended by adding Teec Nos Pos, Channel 237C1.
    3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Colorado, is 
amended by adding Bayfield, Channel 223A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-13135 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,894                  16,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      940                   2,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100                      60
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    49                     604
<PP&E>                                             784                     632
<DEPRECIATION>                                      83                      28
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,150                  20,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,050                   4,113
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  28,422
<COMMON>                                           101                      15
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,983                (12,266)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,150                  20,284
<SALES>                                          1,699                   1,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,699                   1,307
<CGS>                                          (1,527)                 (1,284)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (1,527)                 (1,284)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,437)                 (1,132)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 251                      28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,014)                 (1,081)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,014)                 (1,081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.93)                   (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)                   (.75)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20650]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12647 and <greek-i>12648]


Oklahoma Disaster Number OK-00052

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oklahoma 
(FEMA-1989-DR), dated 06/21/2011.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/22/2011 through 05/25/2011.
    Effective Date: 08/03/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/22/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/21/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Oklahoma, dated 06/21/2011, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Craig, Nowata.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008).

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-20650 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Abraham R. Alderman *vs.*Benjamin Yasmer et al.

Third Judicial District.

Argued April 9th —

decided May 28th, 1918.

Action to recover for merchandise sold, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County and tried to the jury before *Wolfe, J.;*the jury returned a verdict for the defendants, which the court, upon motion of the plaintiff, set aside as against the evidence, and from this action the defendants appealed.

*No error.*

*Joseph Koletsky,*for the appellants (defendants).

*Jacob Capian,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion filed with the clerk of the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County.