alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132370 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### JANICE BUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132370 COA: 268362 Wayne CC: 04-422749-CZ DETROIT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 233 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 233

 Making minority party appointments for the Select Committee on Ethics 
                        for the 110th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2007

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Making minority party appointments for the Select Committee on Ethics 
                        for the 110th Congress.

    Resolved, That the following be the minority membership on the 
Select Committee on Ethics for the remainder of the 110th Congress, or 
until their successors are appointed:
     Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Isakson.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 32


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Stephen P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve P. Foster, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.




/s/ Stephen P. Wilson               /s/ Steve P. Foster
-----------------------             -----------------------
Stephen P. Wilson                   Steve P. Foster
Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 10, 2004
#### § 779.500 Purpose of subpart.

In Subpart A of this part, reference was made to a number of regulations which discuss provisions of the Act, such as general coverage, overtime compensation, joint employment, hours worked, and methods of payment of wages, which are applicable to others as well as to retailers and their employees. (See § 779.6.) In addition to those provisions, the act contains other provisions of interest to retailers and their employees. It is the purpose of this subpart to focus attention on several of the more significant provisions in these categories.
§ 2570.62 Service: Copies of documents and pleadings. For 502(c)(2) penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.3 of this title. ( a ) *General.* Copies of all documents shall be served on all parties of record. All documents should clearly designate the docket number, if any, and short title of all matters. All documents to be filed shall be delivered or mailed to the Chief Docket Clerk, Office of Administrative Law Judges, 800 K Street, NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20001-8002, or to the OALJ Regional Office to which the proceeding may have been transferred for hearing. Each document filed shall be clear and legible.
( b ) *By parties.* All motions petitions, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be filed with the Office of Administrative Law Judges with a copy, including any attachments, to all other parties or record. When a party is represented by an attorney, service shall be made upon the attorney. Service of any document upon any party may be made by personal delivery or by mailing a copy to the last known address. The Department shall be served by delivery to the Associate Solicitor, Plan Benefits Security Division, ERISA section 502(c)(2) Proceeding, P.O. Box 1914, Washington, DC 20013. The person serving the document shall certify to the manner and date of service.
( c ) *By the Office of Administrative Law Judges.* Service of orders, decisions and all other documents shall be made by regular mail to the last known address.
( d ) *Form of pleadings.* ( 1 ) Every pleading shall contain information indicating the name of the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) as the agency under which the proceeding is instituted, the title of the proceeding, the docket number (if any) assigned by the Office of Administrative Law Judges and a designation of the type of pleading or paper (e.g., notice, motion to dismiss, etc.). The pleading or paper shall be signed and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or person representing the party. Although there are no formal specifications for documents, they should be typewritten when possible on standard size 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inch paper.
( 2 ) Illegible documents, whether handwritten, typewritten, photocopies, or otherwise, will not be accepted. Papers may be reproduced by any duplicating process provided all copies are clear and legible.
[54 FR 26897, June 26, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 54708, Oct. 22, 1991]
§ 531.39 Payments to third persons pursuant to court order. ( a ) Where an employer is legally obliged, as by order of a court of competent and appropriate jurisdiction, to pay a sum for the benefit or credit of the employee to a creditor of the employee, trustee, or other third party, under garnishment, wage attachment, trustee process, or bankruptcy proceeding, deduction from wages of the actual sum so paid is not prohibited: *Provided,* That neither the employer nor any person acting in his behalf or interest derives any profit or benefit from the transaction. In such case, payment to the third person for the benefit and credit of the employee will be considered equivalent, for the purposes of the Act, to payment to the employee.
( b ) The amount of any individual's earnings withheld by means of any legal or equitable procedure for the payment of any debt may not exceed the restriction imposed by section 303(a), title III, Restriction on Garnishment, of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (82 Stat. 163, 164; 15 U.S.C. 1671 *et seq.*). The application of title III is discussed in part 870 of this chapter. When the payment to a third person of moneys withheld pursuant to a court order under which the withholdings exceeds that permitted by the CCPA, the excess will not be considered equivalent to payment of wages to the employee for purpose of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
[35 FR 10757, July 2, 1970]
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3415 — CRH/SEMAPA/SECIL JV)

(2004/C 195/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 May 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVastera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Philip J. Balsamo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| /s/ Philip J. Balsamo   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Philip J. Balsamo       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 14, 2002         |

 

----
### Water resources of the Waterbury-Bristol area, Connecticut

By: Robert Vittum CushmanF. H. PauszekA. D. RandallM. P. Thomas

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1499J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          49,808
<SECURITIES>                                    43,695
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,198
<PP&E>                                          84,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,171
<BONDS>                                          2,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           587
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,857
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,033
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   616
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (88,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (88,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (88,466)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.59)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  SUBSIDIARIES - MERCURY GENERAL CORPORATION

Mercury Casualty Company (100% owned)
Mercury Insurance Company (100% owned by Mercury Casualty Company)
California General Underwriters Insurance Company, Inc. (100% owned by Mercury
Casualty Company)
California Automobile Insurance Company (100% owned)
Mercury Insurance Company of Georgia (100% owned by California Automobile
Insurance Company)
Mercury Indemnity Company of Georgia (100% owned)
Mercury Insurance Company of Illinois (100% owned)
Mercury Indemnity Company of Illinois (100% owned by Mercury Insurance Company
of Illinois)
American Mercury Insurance Company (100% owned)
American Mercury Lloyds Insurance Company *
AFI Management Company, Inc. (100% owned by American Fidelity Ins. Company) **
American Mercury MGA, Inc. (100% owned by American Mercury Insurance Company)
Concord Insurance Services, Inc. *

*    Controlled by Mercury General Corporation

**   Attorney-in-fact for American Fidelity Lloyds Insurance Co., whose results
     are consolidated with Mercury General Corporation.
Exhibit
99





NASDAQ rule used by the
Company to determine whether a director is independent.





4200.
Definitions





(a) For
purposes of the Rule 4000 Series, unless the context requires
otherwise:





(15)
“Independent director” means a person other than an officer or employee of the
company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship,
which, in the opinion of the company's board of directors, would interfere with
the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a
director. The following persons shall not be considered
independent:


(A) a
director who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by the
company or by any parent or subsidiary of the company;


(B) a
director who accepted or who has a Family Member who accepted any payments from
the company or any parent or subsidiary of the company in excess of $60,000
during the current or any of the past three fiscal years, other than the
following:


(i)
compensation for board or board committee service;


(ii)
payments arising solely from investments in the company’s
securities;


(iii)
compensation paid to a Family Member who is a non-executive employee of the
company or a parent or subsidiary of the company;


(iv)
benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary
compensation; or


(v) loans
permitted under Section 13(k) of the Act.


Provided,
however, that audit committee members are subject to additional, more stringent
requirements under Rule 4350(d).


(C) a
director who is a Family Member of an individual who is, or at any time during
the past three years was, employed by the company or by any parent or subsidiary
of the company as an executive officer;


(D) a
director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a partner in, or a controlling
shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the company
made, or from which the company received, payments for property or services in
the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the
recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is
more, other than the following:


(i)
payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities;
or


(ii)
payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching
programs.


(E) a
director of the listed company who is, or has a Family Member who is, employed
as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past
three years any of the executive officers of the listed company serve on the
compensation committee of such other entity; or


(F) a
director who is, or has a Family Member who is, a current partner of the
company’s outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the company’s outside
auditor who worked on the company’s audit at any time during any of the past
three years.


(G) In
the case of an investment company, in lieu of paragraphs (A)-(F), a director who
is an “interested person” of the company as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, other than in his or her capacity as a member of
the board of directors or any board committee.


* *
*
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5128 ROBERT J. DAVISON and EVELYN M. DAVISON, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 04-CV-1112, Judge Lawrence J. Block. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April 21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 7, 2008 order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

### APR 16 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk COURIPSIP . PEALS FOR THE FEDERAL ciRcuff cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Deborah K. Snyder, Esq. s20 APR 16 2009 JhF flurtohur CLERK
**EXHIBIT 32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 **OF**
 **PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND**
 **PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, Albert H. Pleus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.
 
 I, Jose Perez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of a21, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of a21, Inc.
 
 Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.
 
 By: /s/ Albert H. Pleus
 Albert H. Pleus
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 By: /s/ Jose Perez
 Jose Perez
 Vice President of Finance
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 Date: November 15, 2004
#### § 452.23 Frequency of elections.

The Act requires that all national and international labor organizations (other than federations of such labor organizations) elect their officers not less often than every five years. Officers of intermediate bodies, such as general committees, system boards, joint boards, joint councils, conferences, and certain districts, district councils and similar organizations, must be elected at least every four years, and officers of local labor organizations not less often than every three years.
#### § 530.410 Special procedures.

In a revocation proceeding pursuant to § 530.205(d) of subpart C of this part arising as a result of a certificate holder's failure to pay back wages or civil money penalties judged owing, the Administrator may file a motion for expedited decision, attaching to the notice, by affidavit or other means, evidence that a final order has been entered or agreement signed requiring respondent to pay back wages or civil money penalties and that the back wages or civil money penalties have not been paid. The respondent in the proceeding shall have 20 days in which to file a countering affidavit or other evidence. If no evidence countering the material assertions of the Administrator has been submitted within 20 days, the Administrative Law Judge shall, within 30 days thereafter, affirm the revocation or denial of the certificate. If the respondent does timely file such evidence, the Administrative Law Judge shall schedule a hearing pursuant to § 530.411(c) of this subpart and the case shall be subject to the expeditious procedures following therein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,645,000
<SECURITIES>                                   103,628,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,183,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       972,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,261,000
<PP&E>                                          18,333,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,829,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,233,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,495,000
<BONDS>                                            334,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,372,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,233,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,807,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,290,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,357,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   972,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,126,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,126,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,126,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.78)



</TABLE>