alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35101-35102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 5-6, 2000.
    Time: July 5, 2000, 10:00 pm to Recess.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Hyatt Regency Hotel, 100 Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Time: July 6, 2000, 8:30 am to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Hyatt Regency Hotel, 100 Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301 402-0838.

[[Page 35102]]

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93. 172, 
Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: May 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13714 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00584-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S.Q.C., a Child

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-PA-01087

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023

DISMISSED

Appellant moved to dismiss this appeal. Appellee has not objected to the motion. 

Appellant’s motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f); 

Caballero v. Heart of Tex. Pizza, L.L.C., 70 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, no 

pet.) (en banc) (per curiam).

PER CURIAM
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 137341 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

## Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices



## v SC: 137341 COA: 286383 Monroe CC: 07-036287-FH CHARLES TALIAFERRO SMITH, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
Submitted on record and briefs December 16, 1992,

remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed February 3, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DENNIS LYLE RHODES, *Appellant.*

(10-89-01405; CA A72151)

844 P2d 946

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Diane S. Lefkow, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*100PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after the court revoked his probation. The state concedes that the court erred by modifying a previously imposed but unexecuted sentence. *State v. McBride,*103 Or App 642, 798 P2d 728 (1990). We accept that concession.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00514

- CR

Steven Gonzale s , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

NO. CR28727, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Steven Gonzales has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion

is signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See id

.

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed : August 16, 2024

Do Not Publish
§ 100.1311 Special Local Regulation; Montlake Cut, Lake Washington, Seattle, Washington. ( a ) *Regulated area.* The regulations in this section apply to the following area: The navigable waters from Montlake Cut and Union Bay Reach between Portage Bay and Webster Point on Lake Washington in Seattle, from the southern corner of University of Washington Oceanography pier at 47°38′57′′ N, 122°18′45′′ W thence south to 47°38′46′′ N, 122°18′45′′ W, thence eastward to Webster Point Light 21 at 47°38′51′′ N, 122°16′33′′ W, thence south to the SR520 bridge at 47°38′37′′ N, 122°16′34′′ W. These coordinates are based on North American Datum 83 (NAD 83).
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Designated representative* means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Puget Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the regulations in this section.
*Participant* means all persons and vessels registered with the event sponsor as participants in the race. Spectator means any vessel in the vicinity of a marine event with the primary purpose of witnessing the event. Spectator vessels can observe the marine event from one of the designated spectator areas. One area is located north of Union Bay Reach in Union Bay. The other is located in the area between the state route 520 bridge and south of Union Bay Reach.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) All non-participants are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated area described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or their designated representative.
( 2 ) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by calling the Sector Puget Sound Command Center at 206-217-6002. Those in the regulated area must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the designated representative.
( 3 ) The COTP will provide notice of the regulated area through advanced notice via broadcast notice to mariners, announcement in the local notice to mariners, and by on-scene designated representatives.
( d ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced annually from 8 a.m. until 12 p.m. on the first Saturday of May.
[USCG-2021-0774, 87 FR 19805, Apr. 6, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37,541]


Joshua L. Bailey Co., Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Joshua L. Bailey Co., Inc., 
Hoboken, New Jersey. The application contained no new substantial 
information which would bear importantly on the Department's 
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-37, 541; Joshua L. Bailey Co., Hoboken, New Jersey (May 24, 
2000).


    Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of May 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-13758 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 103.310 Responsibilities of the Area Maritime Security (AMS) Committee. ( a ) The AMS Committee shall: ( 1 ) Identify critical port infrastructure and operations;
( 2 ) Identify risks (threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences);
( 3 ) Determine mitigation strategies and implementation methods;
( 4 ) Develop and describe the process to continually evaluate overall port security by considering consequences and vulnerabilities, how they may change over time, and what additional mitigation strategies can be applied; and
( 5 ) Provide advice to, and assist the COTP in, developing the AMS Plan.
( b ) The AMS Committee shall also serve as a link for communicating threats and changes in MARSEC Levels, and disseminating appropriate security information to port stakeholders.
#### § 785.10 Scope of subpart.

This subpart applies the principles to the problems which arise frequently.
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron E. Hooper, certifythat 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marine PetroleumTrust for which Simmons Bank acts as Trustee; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 
 (b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes; 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors: 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: August 31, 2022  
/s/ Ron E. Hooper
                                           Ron E. Hooper **
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.44 Decision of the Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) *Proposed findings of fact, conclusions, and order.* Within 30 days of filing of the transcript of the testimony, each party may file with the Administrative Law Judge proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, together with a supporting brief expressing the reasons for such proposals. Such proposals and brief shall be served on all parties, and shall refer to all portions of the record and to all authorities relied upon in support of each proposal.
( b ) *Decision of the Administrative Law Judge.* Within 60 days after the time allowed for filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, or within 30 days after receipt of an agreement containing consent findings and order disposing of the disputed matter in whole, the Administrative Law Judge shall make his/her decision. If any aggrieved party desires review of the decision a petition for review thereof shall be filed as provided in § 6.45 of this title, and such decision and order shall be inoperative unless and until the Administrative Review Board issues an order affirming the decision. The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law, with reasons and bases therefor, upon each material issue of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record. Such decision shall be in accordance with the regulations and rulings contained in parts 4 and 5 and other pertinent parts of this title. The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall be based upon a consideration of the whole record, including any admissions made in the respondents' answer (response) and § 6.43 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

LEROY LONDON,

Petitioner

v.

ZONING BOARD OF PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 570 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit12.1**

 

**SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST**

**Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

(dollarsin thousands)

 
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Three Months Ended   March 31,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                         | ** ** | **2005**                           | ** ** | **2004**                    | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                          |       |                               |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                         |       | $                                  | 13,865     |                        | $          | 13,269 |   | $ | 56,742 |   | $ | 45,874 |   | $ | 50,184 |   | $ | 17,018 |   | $ | 58,437 |   |
| Fixed charges                      |       | 11,223                             |       | 10,370                      |       | 41,836 |   | 37,899 |   | 30,210 |   | 7,334 |   | 15,366 |   |
| Adjusted earnings                  |       | $                                  | 25,088     |                        | $          | 23,639 |   | $ | 98,578 |   | $ | 83,773 |   | $ | 80,394 |   | $ | 24,352 |   | $ | 73,803 |   |
|                               |       |                               |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                     |       |                               |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                   |       | $                                  | 11,223     |                        | $          | 10,370 |   | $ | 41,836 |   | $ | 37,899 |   | $ | 30,210 |   | $ | 7,334 |   | $ | 15,366 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |       | 2.2x                               |       | 2.3x                        |       | 2.4x |   | 2.2x |   | 2.7x |   | 3.3x |   | 4.8x |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10 (ii)
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                                October 21, 2002

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of
Yankton Area Progressive Growth, Inc. of P. O. Box 588, Yankton, SD 57078, the
principal sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($250,000.00),
with no interest thereon for thirty (30) months with principal payments due as
follows: November 1, 2003, the sum of $100,000; November 1, 2004, the sum of
$100,000; and April 21, 2005, the sum of $50,000.

         The maker, surety, endorser and guarantor of this Note hereby waives
presentment for payment, notice of nonpayment, protest, and notice of protest,
and consent that time of payment may be extended without notice thereof.

         In the event a default should occur in the payment of any installment
due under this Note, or in the performance of any other agreement in this Note,
then and in any such event, this Note shall become immediately due and payable
at the option of the holder hereof.

                                             M-Tron Industries, Inc.

                                             By: /s/ Robert Zylstra
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Robert Zylstra
                                                 Its President
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 418

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding provocative and dangerous 
     statements made by officials of the Government of the Russian 
  Federation concerning the territorial integrity of the Republic of 
                                Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 2007

Mr. Biden submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding provocative and dangerous 
     statements made by officials of the Government of the Russian 
  Federation concerning the territorial integrity of the Republic of 
                                Georgia.

Whereas, since 1993, the territorial integrity of the Republic of Georgia has 
        been reaffirmed by the international community, international law, and 
        32 United Nations Security Council Resolutions;
Whereas the Republic of Georgia has pursued the peaceful resolution of 
        territorial conflicts in the regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia since 
        the end of hostilities in 1993;
Whereas, by stating that the Russian Federation should diplomatically recognize 
        Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states, certain officials of 
        the Government of the Russian Federation have undermined the peace and 
        security of those regions and the Republic of Georgia as a whole; and
Whereas the statements of those officials are incompatible with the role of the 
        Russian Federation as one of the world's leading powers and are 
        inconsistent with the commitments of the Russian Federation to 
        international peacekeeping: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) condemns recent statements by officials of the 
        Government of the Russian Federation that the Russian 
        Federation should recognize the regions of Abkhazia and South 
        Ossetia as states independent of the Republic of Georgia as a 
        violation of the sovereignty of the Republic of Georgia and the 
        commitments of the Russian Federation to international 
        peacekeeping;
            (2) calls upon the Government of the Russian Federation to 
        disavow these statements;
            (3) affirms that the restoration of the territorial 
        integrity of the Republic of Georgia is in the interest of all 
        who seek peace and stability in the region; and
            (4) urges all parties to the conflicts in the Republic of 
        Georgia and governments around the world to eschew rhetoric 
        that escalates tensions and undermines efforts to negotiate a 
        settlement to the conflicts.
                                 <all>
```