alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 70 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4, File No. 033-56908 under the Securities
Act of 1933 and Amendment No. 193 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4, File No. 811-06032 under the Securities Act of 1940 of Separate Account VA B of our report dated April 24, 2015 relating to the financial statements of Separate Account VA
B and to the use of our report dated April 24, 2015 with respect to the financial statements of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
“Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in such Registration Statement. 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
 Chicago,
Illinois  
 April 24, 2015 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information
and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of the
subaccounts of the Separate Account VA B, included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 70 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 33-56908) and related Prospectuses of Transamerica Freedom Variable
Annuity and MEMBERS Freedom Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Des Moines, IA 
 April 24, 2015
#### § 780.816 Processing of specific commodities.

Only the processing of sugar beets, sugar-beet molasses, sugarcane, or maple sap is within the exemption. Operations performed on commodities other than those named are not exempt under this section even though they result in the production of unrefined sugar or syrup. For example, sorghum cane or refinery syrup (which is a byproduct of refined syrup) are not named commodities and employees engaged in processing these products are not exempt under this section even though the resultant product is raw sugar. The loss of exemption would obtain for the same reason for employees engaged in processing sugar, glucose, or ribbon cane syrup into syrup.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Ferrer, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Mark J. Ferrer                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark J. Ferrer                        |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 12, 2003                          |

 

 

Signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Vastera, Inc. and will be retainedby Vastera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 825.603 Special rules for school employees, duration of FMLA leave. ( a ) If an employee chooses to take leave for periods of a particular duration in the case of intermittent or reduced schedule leave, the entire period of leave taken will count as FMLA leave.
( b ) In the case of an employee who is required to take leave until the end of an academic term, only the period of leave until the employee is ready and able to return to work shall be charged against the employee's FMLA leave entitlement. The employer has the option not to require the employee to stay on leave until the end of the school term. Therefore, any additional leave required by the employer to the end of the school term is not counted as FMLA leave; however, the employer shall be required to maintain the employee's group health insurance and restore the employee to the same or equivalent job including other benefits at the conclusion of the leave.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 364 

Commending the people of the State of Washington for showing their support 

for the needs of the State of Washington’s veterans and encouraging 

residents of other States to pursue creative ways to show their own 

support for veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2007 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the people of the State of Washington for showing their support for the needs of the State of Washington’s veterans and encouraging residents of other States 

to pursue creative ways to show their own support for 

veterans. 

Whereas every day, American men and women risk their lives 

serving the country in the Armed Forces; 

Whereas it is important to many Americans to be able to donate money directly to causes about which they care; 

Whereas it is important for residents to have a tangible way 

to demonstrate their support for veterans; 

Whereas despite Government funding for the Nation’s veterans, many important needs of veterans remain unmet; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 364 IS 

Whereas citizens in the State of Washington have banded together in a grassroots effort to create a Veterans Family 

Fund Certificate of Deposit; 

Whereas any bank in the State of Washington can choose to 

offer a Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit; 

Whereas the Bank of Clark County has become the first institution to offer these Certificates of Deposit; 

Whereas the Governor of the State of Washington and the 

Washington State Veterans Affairs Department have expressed the State’s support for this program; 

Whereas when a person buys a Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit from a participating bank, half of the 

interest is automatically donated to the State of Washington’s Veterans Innovation Program to address the 

unmet needs of the State of Washington’s veterans and 

their families; 

Whereas the Veterans Innovation Program provides emergency assistance to help current or former Washington 

National Guard or Reserve service members cope with financial hardships, unemployment, educational needs, and 

many basic family necessities; and 

Whereas the Veterans Family Fund Certificate of Deposit 

will be officially launched on November 8, 2007: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the people of the State of Wash3 ington for showing their support for the needs of the 

4 State of Washington’s veterans; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 364 IS 

1 (2) encourages residents of other States to pur2 sue creative ways to show their own support for vet3 erans. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 779.202 Basic concepts of definition.

Under the definition, the “enterprise” consists of “the related activities performed * * * for a common business purpose.” All of the activities comprising the enterprise must be “related.” Activities serving a single business purpose may be related, although different, but other activities which are not related are not included in the enterprise. The definition makes clear that the enterprise includes all such related activities which are performed through “unified operation” or “common control.” This is true even if they are performed by more than one person, or in more than one establishment, or by more than one corporate or other organizational unit. Specifically included, as a part of the enterprise, are departments of an establishment operated through leasing arrangements. On the other hand, the definition excludes from the “enterprise” activities only performed “for” the enterprise rather than as a part of it by an independent contractor even if they are related to the activities of the enterprise. Also, it makes clear that a truly independent retail or service establishment does not become a part of a larger enterprise merely because it enters into certain types of franchise or collective purchasing arrangements or because it has a common landlord with other such retail establishments.
§ 870.55 Terms and conditions of every exemption. ( a ) It shall be a condition of every exemption of State-regulated garnishments that the State representative have the powers and duties ( 1 ) To represent, and act on behalf of, the State in relation to the Administrator and his representatives, with regard to any matter relating to, or arising out of, the application, interpretation, and enforcement of State laws regulating garnishment of earnings;
( 2 ) To submit to the Administrator in duplicate and on a current basis, a certified copy of every enactment by the State legislature affecting any of those laws, and a certified copy of any decision in any case involving any of those laws, made by the highest court of the State which has jurisdiction to decide or review cases of its kind, if properly presented to the court; and
( 3 ) To submit to the Administrator any information relating to the enforcement of those laws, which the Administrator may request.
( b ) The Administrator may make any exemption subject to additional terms and conditions which he may find appropriate to carry out the purposes of section 303(a) of the Act.
#### STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE *v.*ARTHUR O. KLEIN

(AC 19331)

Foti, Lavery and Daly, Js.

Argued December 3

officially released December 28, 1999

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James R. Moffett, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of McMoRan Exploration Co. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 26, 2013



/s/ James R. MoffettJames R. MoffettPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Sections 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2000-7385.                 

*Date Filed:*                     May 17, 2000.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

PTC2 EUR 0309 dated 2 May 2000 r1-r17; 

PTC2 EUR 0310 dated 2 May 2000 r18; 

PTC2 EUR 0311 dated 2 May 2000 r19-r20; 

PTC2 EUR 0312 dated 2 May 2000 r21-r22; 

Within Europe Resolutions r1-r22; 

Minutes—PTC2 EUR 0308 dated 28 April 2000; 

Tables—None; 

Intended effective date: 15 June, 1 August, 1 September, 1 October 2000. 

Dorothy Y. Beard, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-13360 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2004 |  |                        
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Dennis L. Shogren  
|                      |  | Dennis L. Shogren      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Liesel Loesch,Chief Financial Officer of VantageMed Corporation, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of VantageMed Corporation;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|                           |   | /s/ LIESEL  LOESCH      |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                      |   | Liesel Loesch           |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |
| Dated: April 2, 2007 |   |                    |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 21
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MACDERMID, INCORPORATED
MacDermid's  principal,  wholly-owned,  subsidiaries  are  as  follows:
                                        Jurisdiction of
                                        Incorporation
                                        ---------------
Jager Juene, S.A.                       France
MacDermid Asia, Ltd                     Hong Kong
MacDermid Benelux BV                    Holland
MacDermid Canning, plc                  United Kingdom
MacDermid Chemicals, Inc.               Canada
MacDermid Equipment, Inc.               Connecticut
MacDermid Equipment Asia                Taiwan
MacDermid Equipment GmbH                Germany
MacDermid Espanola, S.A.                Spain
MacDermid France, S.A.                  France
MacDermid Galvanevet, SRL               Italy
MacDermid GmbH                          Germany
MacDermid GmbH Canning                  Germany
MacDermid Graphic Arts                  Delaware
MacDermid Hong Kong, Ltd.               Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Asia       Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Europe BV  Holland
MacDermid Italiana SRL                  Italy
MacDermid New Zealand, Ltd.             New Zealand
MacDermid Scandinavia                   Sweden
MacDermid S.A. (Pty.) Ltd.              South Africa
MacDermid Singapore, Pte. Ltd.          Singapore
MacDermid Suisse, S.A.                  Switzerland
MacDermid Taiwan, Ltd.                  Taiwan
Napp Systems Inc.                       California
Nippon MacDermid Co., Inc.              Japan
Rollin, S.A.                            France

In  addition,  the  Corporation has several non operating subsidiaries which, in
the  aggregate,  are  not  significant.
#### § 785.34 Effect of section 4 of the Portal-to-Portal Act.

The Portal Act provides in section 4(a) that except as provided in subsection (b) no employer shall be liable for the failure to pay the minimum wage or overtime compensation for time spent in “walking, riding, or traveling to and from the actual place of performance of the principal activity or activities which such employee is employed to perform either prior to the time on any particular workday at which such employee commences, or subsequent to the time on any particular workday at which he ceases, such principal activity or activities.” Section 4(a) further provides that the use of an employer's vehicle for travel by an employee and activities that are incidental to the use of such vehicle for commuting are not considered principal activities when the use of such vehicle is within the normal commuting area for the employer's business or establishment and is subject to an agreement on the part of the employer and the employee or the representative of such employee. Subsection (b) provides that the employer shall not be relieved from liability if the activity is compensable by express contract or by custom or practice not inconsistent with an express contract. Thus traveltime at the commencement or cessation of the workday which was originally considered as working time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (such as underground travel in mines or walking from time clock to work-bench) need not be counted as working time unless it is compensable by contract, custom or practice. If compensable by express contract or by custom or practice not inconsistent with an express contract, such traveltime must be counted in computing hours worked. However, ordinary travel from home to work (see § 785.35) need not be counted as hours worked even if the employer agrees to pay for it. (See *Tennessee Coal, Iron & RR. Co.* v. *Musecoda Local,* 321 U.S. 590 (1946); *Anderson* v. *Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.,* 328 U.S. 690 (1946); *Walling* v. *Anaconda Copper Mining Co.,* 66 F. Supp. 913 (D. Mont. (1946).)

[26 FR 190, Jan. 11, 1961, as amended at 76 FR 18860, Apr. 5, 2011]
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Stephen P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert C. Haines, II, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Stephen P. Wilson/s/ Robert C. Haines, IIStephen P. Wilson
Chief Executive OfficerRobert C. Haines, II
Chief Financial Officer  Date: April 27, 2009
(78 South. 990)

#### BESHEARS v. STATE.

(8 Div. 532.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 2, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; R. C. Briekell, Judge.

Lanier & Pride, of Huntsville, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Emmett S. Thigpen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

Affirmed on authority of James Lee Herring v. State, ante, p. 423, 78 South. 417.
EXHIBIT 32(a)  CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of The LGL Group, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Zylstra, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  March 26, 2009/s/ Robert ZylstraName:Robert ZylstraTitle:President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)