alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2197-038; North Carolina]

An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. The EA analyzes the environmental effects of a request to amend the license to authorize upgrades of turbines and generators at three of the four developments of the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project located on the Yadkin-Pee Dee River in Montgomery, Stanly, Davidson, Rowan, and Davie Counties, North Carolina. The Yadkin Hydroelectric Project contains the following reservoirs: High Rock, Tuckertown, Narrows (Badin) and Falls.

The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The proposed upgrade would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Copies of the EA assistance. Copies are also available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371.

Anyone may file comments on the EA. The public, federal and state resource agencies are encouraged to provide comments. All written comments must be filed within 30 days of the issuance date of this notice shown above. Send an original and eight copies of all comments marked with the project number P-2197-038 to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact R. Feller at telephone: (202) 219-2796 or e-mail: rainer.feller@ferc.fed.us

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-13620  Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.10 - May 29, 2012 Consent of Stockholders in Lieu
of Meeting

CONSENT OF STOCKHOLDERS IN LIEU OF MEETING

Pursuant to Article I, Section 1.11 of the Bylaws of PyroTec,
Inc. (the "Corporation"), a Delaware corporation and successor in
interest to Accelerated Acquisition XV, Inc., the shareholders
constituting a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of
common stock in the Corporation, hereby execute the following
resolutions:

1. Jon Dyer, as Chairman of the Board for the Corporation, is
hereby authorized to execute the following agreements with
Resource Recycling Limited, Inc.: (a) Utilization Licensing
Agreement dated May 29, 2012, (b) Operational Licensing Agreement
dated May 29, 2012, and (c) Global Licensing, Operational and
Utilization Agreement dated May 29, 2012.

2. Any and all actual or perceived conflicts of interest or
related party transactions set forth in paragraph 1, above, are
waived and approved, respectively, as being in the best interests
of the Corporation.

3. Any and all prior actions of the Board of Directors are
approved and ratified.

This consent is executed as of May 29, 2012.

RESOLVED:

/s/ D. Geno Brunton

World Venture Group, Inc.

Shareholder

Authorized Signator
#### § 776.9 General scope of “in commerce” coverage.

Under the definitions quoted above, it is clear that the employees who are covered by the wage and hours provisions of the Act as employees “engaged in commerce” are employees doing work involving or related to the movement of persons or things (whether tangibles or intangibles, and including information and intelligence) “among the several States or between any State and any place outside thereof.”[23] Although this does not include employees engaged in activities which merely “affect” such interstate or foreign commerce, the courts have made it clear that coverage of the Act based on engaging in commerce extends to every employee employed “in the channels of” such commerce or in activities so closely related to such commerce, as a practical matter, that they should be considered a part of it.[24] The courts have indicated that the words “in commerce” should not be so limited by construction as to defeat the purpose of Congress, but should be interpreted in a manner consistent with their practical meaning and effect in the particular situation. One practical question to be asked is whether, without the particular service, interstate or foreign commerce would be impeded, impaired, or abated;[25] others are whether the service contributes materially to the consummation of transactions in interstate or foreign commerce[26] or makes it possible for existing instrumentalities of commerce[27] to accomplish the movement of such commerce effectively and to free it from burdens or obstructions.[28]

###### Footnotes -
  776.9

[23] “Any place outside thereof” is not limited in meaning to another State or country. Any movement between a State and a place “outside thereof” is “commerce” for purposes of the Act, such as ship-to-shore communication, or transportation out of a State by ship of food, fuel, or ice to be consumed at sea before arrival at another port.

[24] *Walling* v. *Jacksonville Paper Co.,* 317 U.S. 564; *Overstreet* v. *North Shore Corp.,* 318 U.S. 125; *McLeod* v. *Threlkeld,* 319 U.S. 491; *Boutell* v. *Walling,* 327 U.S. 463; *Pedersen* v. *J. F. Fitzgerald Constr. Co.,* 318 U.S. 740 and 324 U.S. 720.

[25] *Republic Pictures Corp.* v. *Kappler,* 151 F. 2d 543 (C.A. 8), affirmed 327 U.S. 757; *New Mexico Public Service Co.* v. *Engel,* 145 F. 2d 636 (C.A. 10).

[26] *Walling* v. *Sondock,* 132 F. 2d 77 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied 318 U.S. 772. See also *Horton* v. *Wilson & Co.,* 223 N.C. 71, 25 S.E. 2d 437, in which the court stated that an employee is engaged “in commerce” if his services—not too remotely but substantially and directly—aid in such commerce as defined in the Act.

[27] For a list of such instrumentalities, see § 776.11.

[28] *Overstreet* v. *North Shore Corp.,* 318 U.S. 125; *J. F. Fitzgerald Constr. Co.* v. *Pedersen,* 324 U.S. 720; *Ritch* v. *Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.,* 156 F. 2d 334 (C.A. 9); *Walling* v. *McCrady Constr. Co.,* 156 F. 2d 932 (C.A. 3); *Bennett* v. *V. P. Loftis,* 167 F. 2d 286 (C.A. 4); *Walling* v. *Patton-Tully Transp. Co.,* 134 F. 2d 945 (C.A. 6).
#### Showalter *v.*Rupe.

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Sept. 16, 1897.)*

[27 S. E. Rep. 840.]

Appeal — Amount in Controversy — Subjecting Land to Debt.

The amount involved, in an appeal from a decree subjecting land to the payment of a debt is the amount of the debt, irrespective of the value of the land.

Appeal from circuit court, Pulaski county.

Bill by E. J. Eupe against W. PI. Showalter and others. From decree for complainant, defendant Showalter appeals.

Dismissed.

*J. O.*Wysor, for appellant.

*I. 1L*lareu', for appellee.

Cardwell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was instituted by the appellee, E. J. Eupe, against W. H. Showalter (appellant), *W.*J. Showalter, and C. E. Elmore, to subject certain real estate to the payment of a debt of $200, with interest on $100, part thereof, from September 18, 1892, and on $100, the residue, from September 18, 1893, — the bill alleging that the property was conveyed to appellant by W. J. Showalter and C. E. Elmore to hinder, delay, and defraud appellee in the collection of this debt due *554him by W. J. Showalter, to whom the property really belonged, and upon which appellee was entitled to a lien for the amount of his debt; and the decrees appealed from held the deed to be fraudulent as to appellee, and that appellant held the property in trust for the payment of the $200 and interest due to appellee, subject to a paramount lien of C. E. Elmore for the balance of purchase money due him for the property from appellant, and afterwards paid by the latter. To relieve himself of the decrees appealed from as to appellee, appellant has only to pay the debt decreed to appellee ; and the amount involved in this appeal, therefore, being less than $500, this court has no jurisdiction, and the appeal must be dismissed, as improvidently awarded. Duffy v. Figgat, 80 Va. 664; Hawkins v. Gresham, 85 Va. 35, 6 S. E. 472.
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35009, June 19, 2008.

§ 101.130 Equivalent security measures. ( a ) For any measure required by part 104, 105, or 106 of this subchapter, the owner or operator may substitute an equivalent security measure that has been approved by the Commandant (CG-5P) as meeting or exceeding the effectiveness of the required measure. The Commandant (CG-5P) may require that the owner or operator provide data for use in assessing the effectiveness of the proposed equivalent security measure.
( b ) Requests for approval of equivalent security measures should be made to the appropriate plan approval authority under parts 104, 105 or 106 of this subchapter.
[USCG-2003-14792, 68 FR 39278, July 1, 2003, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39173, July 1, 2013]
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip navigation
  ADA HomeADA HistoryPart One: Origins of the ADAPart Two: Crafting the LawPart Three: The ADA Becomes LawAchieving the PromiseTools and TechHealth CareLearn, Work and PlayReal People
 Home
          ADA
          Josh Basile Josh Basile
 When he was 18, a spinal cord injury changed Josh’s life, but not his academic and career goals
The summer after his freshman year of college, Josh experienced a spinal cord injury which led to paralysis.  Josh was determined to continue pursuing his dreams, starting with his education, but he didn’t know how.
Josh sought out resources, including his state’s vocational rehabilitation program and the Social Security Administration’s Ticket to Work program. Josh used these resources and assistive technology to pursue his goals, including graduating from law school. Josh now works as a medical malpractice attorney in Maryland.
This video, created by the National Disability Rights Network, tells Josh’s story:

                    *Last modified on 07/27/2020*
 Back to Top    More on the ADA
  

        
      ACL's 31st Anniversary of the ADA page
                      ADA.gov
                      ADA National Network
                      #ThanksToTheADA campaignSITE SUPPORT
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Contact Us
                      Disclaimers
                      Freedom of Information Act
                      Privacy policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers and PlayersRELATED SITES
  

        
      Administration for Community Living
                      HHS Office for Civil Rights
                      Department of Health and Human Services
                      CMS: Access to Care
                      No Fear Act (on HHS.gov)
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      White House
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of
Modtech Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based
on his knowledge:

     .    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
          June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     .    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2002

                                                 /s/ Evan M. Gruber
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Evan M. Gruber
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this 10-Q Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 794.1 General scope of the Act.

The Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Act, is a Federal statute of general application which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, equal pay and child labor requirements that apply as provided in the Act. All employees whose employment has the relationship to interstate or foreign commerce which the Act specifies are subject to the prescribed labor standards unless specifically exempted from them. Employers having such employees are required to comply with the Act's provisions in this regard unless relieved therefrom by some exemption in the Act. Such employers are also required to comply with specified recordkeeping requirements contained in part 516 of this chapter. The law authorizes the Department of Labor to investigate for compliance and, in the event of violations, to supervise the payment of unpaid wages or unpaid overtime compensation owing to any employee. The law also provides for enforcement in the courts.
#### BANCPLUS MORTGAGE CORPORATION *v.*THILAGAWATHY THARMAPALAN ET AL.

(AC 18882)

Foti, Spear and Cretella, Js.

Argued November 2

officially released November 30, 1999

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.
#### § 452.65 Interval between nominations and election.

The Act specifies no time interval between nominations and election. Thus, both may be scheduled to be held at the same meeting if, during a reasonable period prior to such nomination-election meeting, every member eligible to hold office who intends to run for office is afforded the protection provided in section 401(c), including sufficient opportunity to campaign for office.
**SECTION      32.0**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                              |                                         |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                         |                                    |
|              |                                                                                   | /s/              Michael H. Head   |
|         | Michael              H. Head President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                                                                                  |                                           |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                             |                                      |
|                                    |                                                                                       | /s/                George J. Smith   |
|                               | George                J. Smith Treasurer                  and Chief Financial Officer |
|                               |                                                                                  |
| Dated:                May 14, 2007 |                                                                                       |

----
§ 794.123 Method of computing annual volume of sales. ( a ) Where the enterprise, during the portion of its current income tax year up to the end of the current payroll period, has already had a gross volume of sales in excess of the amount specified in the statute, it is plain that its annual gross volume of sales currently is in excess of the statutory amount.
( b ) Where the enterprise has not yet in such current year exceeded the statutory amount in its gross volume of sales, but has had, in the most recently ended year used by it for income tax purposes, a gross volume of sales in excess of the amount specified in the Act, the enterprise will be deemed to have an annual gross volume of sales in excess of such statutory amount, unless use of the method set forth in paragraph (c) of this section establishes a gross annual volume less than the statutory amount.
( c ) When it is necessary to make a computation of the annual gross volume of sales of the enterprise the following method shall be used: At the beginning of each calendar quarter (Jan. 1-Mar. 31; Apr. 1-June 30; July 1-Sept. 30; Oct. 1-Dec. 31), the gross receipts from all of its sales during the annual period (12 calendar months) which immediately precedes the current calendar quarter, is totaled. In this manner the employer, by calculating the sales of his enterprise, will know whether or not the dollar volume tests have been met for the purpose of complying with the law in the workweeks ending in the current calendar quarter.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Older Americans Month 2019 Posters
 The following posters may be reproduced freely, electronically and in print.
English
8.5" x 11" OAM English Poster for Web/Digital (PDF, 5.5 MB)
8.5" x 11" OAM English Poster for Print (PDF, 5.6 MB)
18" x 24" OAM English Poster for Print (PDF, 5.6 MB)Spanish
8.5" x 11" OAM Spanish Poster for Web/Digital (PDF, 5.4 MB)
8.5" x 11" OAM Spanish Poster for Print (PDF, 5.5 MB)
18" x 24" OAM Spanish Poster for Print (PDF, 5.8 MB)OAM 2019 Home
OAM 2019 Materials
OAM 2019 Activity Ideas
OAM 2019 Resources

                    *Last modified on 06/04/2019* OAM Connect, Create, Contribute Poster
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
§ 4245.1 Purpose, scope, and filing and issuance rules. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This part prescribes insolvency notice requirements and financial assistance requirements pertaining to critical status plans. Plan sponsors of plans that have terminated by mass withdrawal under section 4041A(a)(2) of ERISA are required to file and issue similar insolvency notices under part 4281 of this chapter and withdrawal liability and actuarial valuation information under part 4041A of this chapter.
( b ) *Filing and issuance rules* — ( 1 ) *Method of filing.* Filing with PBGC under this part must be made by a method permitted under the rules in subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Method of issuance.* The issuance of the required notices to interested parties under this part must be made by one of the following methods— ( i ) A method permitted under the rules in subpart B of part 4000 of this chapter.
( ii ) For interested parties other than participants and beneficiaries in pay status or reasonably expected to enter pay status during the insolvency year for which the notice is given, and other than alternate payees, the plan sponsor may post the notice at participants' work sites or publish the notice in a union newsletter or in a newspaper of general circulation in the area or areas where participants reside. Except with respect to an alternate payee, notice to a participant is deemed notice to that participant's beneficiary or beneficiaries.
( 3 ) *Filing and issuance dates.* The date that a filing is sent and the date that an issuance is provided are determined under the rules in subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter.
( 4 ) *Where to file.* Filings with PBGC under this part must be made as described in § 4000.4 of this chapter.
( 5 ) *Computation of time.* The time period for filing or issuance under this part must be computed under the rules in subpart D of part 4000 of this chapter.
[84 FR 18724, May 2, 2019]