alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13539]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3321]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Egyptian Treasures From the British Museum''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of 
October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibition ``Egyptian Treasures from the British Museum'' imported 
from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Bowers Museum 
of Cultural Art, Santa Ana, CA from October 7, 2000 to January 2, 2001 
is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301--4th 
Street, SW, Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-13539 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
(77 South. 926)

#### HUFF v. DYER.

(5 Div. 240.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 22, 1918.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1918.)

1. Trial <&wkey;139(4) — Refusal of General Charge — Evidence Tending to Sustain Right to Recover.

Where there was evidence tending to sustain plaintiff’s right to recover as stated in the several counts of the complaint to winch demurrers were not sustained or confessed, the general charge was properly refused.

2. Trespass &wkey;>20(l) — Proof of Possession.

In an action on the case for trespass to realty, proof of possession is not essential to a recovery.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; A. H. Alston, Judge.

Action by W. C. Dyer against J. W. Huff. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Middleton & Reynolds, of Clanton, for appellant. Pettus, Fuller & Lapsley, of Selma, for appellee.

SAMFORD, J.

[1,2] The only errors insisted upon in appellant’s brief are that the court erred in refusing to give the affirmative charge and charges, to the effect that the plaintiff could not recover without actual possession having been shown. There was *333evidence tending to sustain the plaintiff’s right to recover, as stated in the several counts of the complaint, to which demurrers were not sustained or confessed, and hence the general charge was properly refused. Two of the counts were in case, under which proof of possession was not essential to a recovery, and hence the other charges requested by the defendant were properly refused.

The other assignments of error are either not insisted upon or waived. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2
**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof("the Report"), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Terry A. HansonVice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryDate: March 14, 2005**
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ James D. Shelton   
|-----------------------
|James D. Shelton       
|Chief Executive Officer



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Margaret Agnew, an Infant, etc., Resp’t, *v.*The Brooklyn City R. R. Co., App’lt.

*(City Court of Brooklyn,*

*General Term,*

*Filed April 23, 1889.)*

1. Negligence—Street railroads—Liability for injury

Plaintiff, a child of about six years of age, while attempting to cross a public street, was struck down and injured by a horse attached to one of defendant’s cars. The car had no conductor, and the testimony tended to show that the driver, at the time, was directing his attention to the rear of the car. *Held,*that a verdict for plaintiff was proper.

2. Evidence—Competency of witness.

*Held,*that it was not error to permit a witness to testify, who knows at that time that she will he punished if she tells an untruth.

*Ojiarles J. Patterson,*for resp’t: *Morris <& Pearsall, for .*app’lt.

Clement, Ch. J.

The plaintiff, on September 3, 1886, was about six and a half years of age, and on that day, while attempting to cross Sackett street, in this city, was struck by a horse attached to a horse car on one of the defendant’s lines, and was thrown down and severely injured. It was conceded, on the trial, that the car had no conductor, and there was testimony tending to show that the *745driver was, at the time, directing his attention to the rear of the car, and was not on the look-out for foot travelers crossing the street. Such testimony was contradicted by the witnesses for the defense, and the jury, after seeing and hearing all the witnesses, decided to give credit to the statements made on the part of the plaintiff, and rendered a verdict in her favor for $3,500. We have carefully examined the record, and hold that the verdict is not against the weight of evidence.

We also think that it was not error to permit the plaintiff to testify, as she knew, at. the time she gave her testimony, that she" would be punished if she told an untruth, and was competent as a witness on the authority of *Jones*v. *Brooklyn, Bath and West End R. R. Co.,*recently decided by the general term of this court.

We have examined the other exceptions in the case, and do not find error either in the rulings of the trial judge or in his charge.

The judgment and order denying new trial must be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, J., concurs.
§ 4245.4 Contents of notice of insolvency. ( a ) *Notice to PBGC.* A notice of insolvency under § 4245.3 required to be filed with PBGC must contain the information and certification specified in the notice of insolvency instructions on PBGC's website (*www.pbgc.gov*).
( b ) *Notices to interested parties.* A notice of insolvency under § 4245.3 required to be given to interested parties must contain all of the following information— ( 1 ) The information set forth in § 4281.44(b)(1) through (4) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The estimated total amount of annual benefit payments under the plan (determined without regard to the insolvency) for the insolvency year.
( 3 ) The estimated amount of the plan's available resources for the insolvency year.
[84 FR 18724, May 2, 2019]
EXHIBIT
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lescarden Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10KSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, William E. Luther,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      William E. Luther


William E. Luther


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


August 28, 2007
McMoRan Exploration Co.



Secretarys Certificate



I, Douglas N. Currault II, Assistant Secretary of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Corporation), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, do hereby certify that the following resolution was duly adopted by the Sole Director of the Corporation by written consent on November 12, 1998, and that such resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded and is in full force and effect on the date hereof:



RESOLVED, That any report, registration statement or other form filed on behalf of this corporation pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or any amendment to any such report, registration statement or other form, may be signed on behalf of any director or officer of this corporation pursuant to a power of attorney executed by such director or officer.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the seal of the Corporation on March 21, 2003.







/s/ Douglas N. Currault II

Douglas N. Currault II

Assistant Secretary

(Seal)





{F5013646.1}
Exhibit 24-a

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of Richard R. Roscitt, Robert E. Switz and
Jeffrey D. Pflaum, with full power to each to act without the other, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for him or
her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the "Company") for the
Company's fiscal year ended October 31, 2001, and any or all amendments to said Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to file the same with such other authorities as necessary, granting unto each such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 21st day of December, 2001, by the following persons.

|/s/ROBERT ANNUNZIATARobert Annunziata         |  | /s/RICHARD R. ROSCITTRichard R. Roscitt
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|/s/JOHN A. BLANCHARD IIIJohn A. Blanchard III |  | /s/JEAN-PIERRE ROSSOJean-Pierre Rosso  
|/s/JOHN J. BOYLE IIIJohn J. Boyle III         |  | /s/LARRY W. WANGBERGLarry W. Wangberg  
|/s/JAMES C. CASTLEJames C. Castle             |  | /s/JOHN D. WUNSCHJohn D. Wunsch        
|/s/B. KRISTINE JOHNSONB. Kristine Johnson     |  | /s/CHARLES D. YOSTCharles D. Yost      

---

QuickLinks
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > A Survey of Laundries and Their Women Workers in 23 Cities

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Best, Ethel L. (Ethel Lombard)					 and 	Erickson, Ethel. 						*A Survey of Laundries and Their Women Workers in 23 Cities : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 78*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1930,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5386,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the Company's 1984 and 1991
Stock Option Plans, filed on April 15, 1993, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed
on January 31, 1997, the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998, the
Summa ESOP and 401(k) Stock Option Plan, filed on September 8, 1997, the
Calnetics Stock Option Plan, filed on October 21, 1997, the Falcon Acquisition
Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998, the Plastron Acquisition Stock
Option Plan, filed on May 20, 1999, and the previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-4 pertaining to the LexaLite Stock Option Plan, filed on
September 9, 1996, with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933.


                                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
October 26, 2000
§ 93.65 General rules: Elmendorf segment. ( a ) Each person operating a turbine-powered aircraft within this segment shall operate that aircraft at an altitude of at least 1,700 feet MSL until maneuvering for a safe landing requires further descent.
( b ) Each person operating an airplane (other than turbine-powered aircraft) at a speed of more than 105 knots within this segment shall operate that airplane at an altitude of at least 1,200 feet MSL until maneuvering for a safe landing requires further descent.
( c ) Each person operating an airplane (other than turbine-powered aircraft) at a speed of 105 knots or less within the segment shall operate that airplane at an altitude of at least 800 feet MSL until maneuvering for a safe landing requires further descent.
( d ) A person landing or departing from Elmendorf AFB, may operate that aircraft at an altitude between 1,500 feet MSL and 1,700 feet MSL within that portion of the International and Lake Hood segments lying north of the midchannel of Knik Arm.
( e ) A person landing or departing from Elmendorf AFB, may operate that aircraft at an altitude between 900 feet MSL and 1,700 feet MSL within that portion of the Merrill segment lying north of the midchannel of Knik Arm.
( f ) A person operating in VFR conditions, at or below 600 feet MSL, north of a line beginning at the intersection of Farrell Road and the long. 149°43′08′′ W.; thence west along Farrell Road to the east end of Sixmile Lake; thence west along a line bearing on the middle of Lake Lorraine to the northwest bank of Knik Arm; is not required to establish two-way radio communications with ATC.
[Doc. No. 29029, 64 FR 14977, Mar. 29, 1999; Amdt. 93-77, 64 FR 17439, Apr. 9, 1999]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7510 

RONNIE COLCLOUGH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SUMTER LEE REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (6:07-cv-02910-HMH)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Colclough, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Colclough seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Colclough that failure to file

timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite this warning, Colclough failed to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins,

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140 (1985). Colclough has waived appellate review by failing

to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.4****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,    as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison  Gas and Electric Company for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),  I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company.

/s/ Terry A. Hanson   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  March 26, 2003
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Airports Council International-North America, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
§ 519.11 Applicability of the regulations in this subpart. ( a ) *Statutory provisions.* Under section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, and the authority and responsibility delegated to him/her by the Secretary of Labor (36 FR 8755), the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division is authorized and directed, to the extent necessary in order to prevent curtailment of employment opportunities for employment, to provide by regulation or order for the employment, under certificates, of full-time students in institutions of higher education. That section contains provisions requiring a wage rate in such certificates of not less than 85 percent of the minimum wage applicable under section 6 of the Act, limiting weekly hours of employment, stipulating compliance with the applicable child-labor standards, and safeguarding against the reduction of the full-time employment opportunities of employees other than full-time students employed under certificates.
( b ) *Source of limitations.* Some of the limitations expressed in this subpart are specifically required in section 14(b) of the Act. The other limitations implement the provisions relating to employment opportunities, *i.e.,* the “extent necessary in order to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment” and the requirement that the regulations shall “prescribe standards and requirements to insure that this paragraph will not create a substantial probability of reducing the full-time employment opportunities of persons other than those to whom the minimum wage rate authorized by” section 14(b) of the Act is applicable.
[40 FR 6329, Feb. 11, 1975; 40 FR 22546, May 23, 1975, as amended at 82 FR 2227, Jan. 9, 2017]
Submitted on record and briefs December 29, 1992,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing in part February 3,

reconsideration denied April 28,

petition for review allowed May 25, 1993 (316 Or 527)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JOHN WILLIAM ST. JOHN, *Appellant.*

(91CR2444; CA A73366)

844 P2d 947

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*96PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted on two counts of attempted rape, ORS 161.405; ORS 163.375, one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and one count of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.427. He contends that the court erred in the consecutive sentence imposed for Count 2, attempted rape, because it used the incorrect criminal history category. The state concedes that the court was incorrect in using category E. We accept the state’s concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on Count 2.