alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DARRELL WAYNE DEMPSEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10282

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01166-FJM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2011** 

Before: SKOPIL, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 

Darrell Wayne Dempsey appeals his conviction for illegal transportation of

an alien for profit, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether reasonable

FILED

AUG 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10282

suspicion exists to justify a stop, and we review for clear error the district court’s

underlying factual findings. See United States v. Palos-Marquez, 591 F.3d 1272,

1274 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

Dempsey contends the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress

evidence because the police lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop of his vehicle.

 To determine whether a stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, “we consider

whether, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the officer had a

‘particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of

criminal activity.’ ” United States v. Berber-Tinoco, 510 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.

2007) (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 (1981)).

Here, the totality of the circumstances included Dempsey’s rigid driving

posture, his failure to acknowledge the police, his proximity to the border, his

slowing down below the speed limit at the sight of police, and, after the police horn

sounded, the flight of ten Hispanic men from the vehicle he was driving. These

circumstances indicated a particularized and objective basis justifying the officer’s

reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. See United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S.

266, 270-73, 277 (2002) (reasonable suspicion based on use of known smuggling

route, the driver’s rigid posture and failure to acknowledge police, slowed speed in
3 10-10282

the presence of police, and inferences based on police experience). Further, the

district court did not clearly err in crediting the officer’s testimony. See United

States v. Haswood, 350 F.3d 1024, 1028 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting deference to the

district court’s credibility determinations). Accordingly, the district court did not

err in denying the motion to suppress. 

AFFIRMED.
All material appaenng in this report is in the public domain and may be

reproduced or mpied without permission; citation aa to source, however, is

appreciated.

suggestedCitatim

National Center for Health Statistics, L. Fingerhut: Changes in mortality among

the eldetiy, MM States, 1S40-78, Supplement to 1SS0. V#a/ and Health

Statistics. Series 3, No. 22a. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) S4-140Sa. Public Health

S-mice. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, April 1984.

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. GoI”ernment Printing Office, Washington. D.C. 20+OZ
US DepmmentofTransportatiorf ·· 

Docket.Oper.a:tions; M.t30' 

•. ~: ·, J 

West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Gentlemen: 

4616 Chippendale prive 

Fort Collins CO 80526 

·. ·septe~J:)er 2,.2oi2 ·· 

I" <,.' .. A ~ _:_!_ •. : \. 

'·'· 

:' 1:. 'i'" ... ·-;·,, \ 

RE Exemption Number 7734C, from 14 CFR, FAR 91.109(A) and FAR 91.109(b)(3) 

Docket Number F AA-2002-11499 

I wish to renewthis exemption-which allows giving dual instruction in Beech airplanes 

having throw-over c.ontrols to:iiidividuals qualified to serve as PIC in the airplanes under 

certain circumstances. 

Other than having accumulated about 150 additional incident-free flight hours operating 

under this exemption, there have been no changes that would affect the. original 

exemption request. The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety 

presented in the original petition upon which the exemption was granted remain the same. 

Therefore, I request an extension. · · 

Should any further data be required, please inquire at 970 223-4750. FAX 970 206-0183 

Very truly yours, 

CFI3055258
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company forthe period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary J. WolterChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 14, 2005
§ 530.4 Terms and conditions for the issuance of individual homeworker certificates. ( a ) Upon application by the homeworker and the employer on forms provided by the Wage and Hour Division, certificates may be issued to the applicant employer authorizing the employment of a particular worker in industrial homework in a particular industry, provided that the application is in proper form and sets forth facts showing that the worker: ( 1 ) ( i ) Is unable to adjust to factory work because of age or physical or mental disability; or
( ii ) Is unable to leave home because the worker's presence is required to care for an invalid in the home; and
( 2 ) ( i ) Was engaged in industrial homework in the particular industry for which the certificate is applied, as such industry is defined in § 530.1, prior to: (*a*) April 4, 1942, in the button and buckle manufacturing industry; (*b*) November 2, 1942, in the embroideries industry; (*c*) April 1, 1941, in the gloves and mittens industry; (*d*) October 7, 1942, in the handkerchief manufacturing industry; (*e*) July 1, 1941, in the jewelry manufacturing industry; or (*f*) March 5, 1942, in the women's apparel industry, except that if this requirement shall result in unusual hardship to the individual homeworker it shall not be applied; or
( ii ) Is engaged in industrial homework under the supervision of a State Vocational Rehabilitation Agency.
( b ) No homeworker shall perform industrial homework for more than one employer in the same industry, but homework employment in one industry shall not be a bar to the issuance of certificates for other industries.
(Information collection requirements contained in paragraph (a) were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1235-0001) [24 FR 729, Feb. 3, 1959, as amended at 43 FR 28470, June 30, 1978; 46 FR 50349, Oct. 9, 1981; 49 FR 44270, Nov. 5, 1984; 53 FR 45722, Nov. 10, 1988; 82 FR 2228, Jan. 9, 2017]
Form of Certificate of Common Shares of Cencosud S.A.



 Exhibit 4.1 

 
 



 
 NUMERO DEL TITULO 

CENCOSUD S.A. 
 POR ACCIONES 
 ACCIONISTA 

R.U.T 
 COMUNA 
 DOMICILIO 

CIUDAD 
 N°. 0001286 
 FIRMA DEL ACCIONISTA 

FIRMA DEL ENCARGADO DEL REGISTRO DE ACCIONISTAS 
 NUMERO DEL TITULO POR ACCIONES 
 CENCOSUD S.A.

 Sociedad Ano ́nima constituida por Escritura Pública de 10 de Noviembre de 1978, otorgada en la
Notari ́a de Santiago de don Enrique Morgan Torres, modificada por Escritura Pública de 11 de Diciembre de 1978, otorgada ante el mismo Notario, inscrita en el Registro de Comercio de Santiago a Fojas 13.808, nu ́mero 7.412 de 1978
y publicada en el Diario Oficial de fecha 30 de Diciembre de 1978. Autorizada por Resolución N° 554, de 27 de Diciembre de 1978, de la Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros. 

Capital Social Dividido 
 Titulo a favor de 
 Por 

Acciones Nominativas de igual valor, sin valor nominal y de una misma serie. Inscritas en el registro de Accionistas con
el N° 
 Santiago, de de 
 Presidente 
 Gerente General 

CENCOSUD S.A 
 N° 0001286 







 SUMMARY ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF FORM OF STOCK CERTIFICATE 

CENCOSUD S.A. 
 Title Number: 

Number of Shares: 
 Shareholder: 

R.U.T: 
 Address: 

Cencosud S.A., a Sociedad Anónima incorporated by public deed on November 10, 1978, amended by public deed on December 11, 1978, and
registered in the Registry of Commerce of Santiago under Hojas 13.808, N° 7.412 of year 1978, published in the Official Gazette on December 30, 1978. Authorized by the Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros by resolution N° 554 on
December 27, 1978. 
 Divided share capital 
 Title in favor of                      
 For                      
 Ordinary shares of equal price, with non nominal value and among the same series. Registered on the shareholders registry under
N°                    . 

Santiago, [date] 
  
                      

President 
  

                     

General Manager
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Glenn A. Kleinert, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March
21, 2005





/s/ Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President
and

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 779.261 Statutory provision.

Sections 3(s)(1) and 13(a)(2) of the amended Act as well as sections 3(s)(1), 3(s)(2), 3(s)(5), and 13(a)(2)(iv) of the prior Act provide for the exclusion of “excise taxes at the retail level which are separately stated” in computing the gross annual volume of sales or business or the annual dollar volume of sales for purposes of certain of the provisions contained in those sections. The Senate Committee report states as follows with respect to this provision:

- * * in determining whether the enterprise or establishment, as the case may be, has the requisite annual dollar volume of sales, excise taxes will not be counted if they are taxes that are collected at the retail level and are separately identified in the price charged the customer for the goods or services at the time of the sale. Excise taxes which are levied at the manufacturer's, wholesaler's, or other distributive level will not be excluded in calculating the dollar volume of sales nor will excise taxes be excluded in cases where the customer is charged a single price for the merchandise or services and the taxes are not separately identified when the sale is made. (S. Rept., 145, 87th Cong., first session, p. 39.)

In applying the above rules to determine annual gross volume of sales or business under section 3(s) or annual dollar volume of sales for purposes of the $250,000 test under section 13(a)(2), excise taxes which (a) are levied at the retail level and (b) are separately stated and identified in the charge to the customer at the time of sale need not be included in the calculation of the gross or dollar volume of sales. Excise taxes which are levied at the manufacturer's, wholesaler's or other distributive level will not, ordinarily, be excluded in calculating the volume of sales, nor will excise taxes, even if levied at the retail level, be excluded in cases where the customer is charged a single price for the merchandise or services and the taxes are not separately identified when the sale is made. Excise taxes will be excludable whether they are levied by the Federal, State, or local government provided that the tax is “levied at the retail level” and “separately stated”.
Editorial Note on Part 8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 8 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 8.12 Intervention; other participation. For good cause shown, the Board may permit any interested party to intervene or otherwise participate in any proceeding held by the Board.Except when requested orally before the Board, a petition to intervene or otherwise participate shall be in writing and shall state with precision and particularity: ( a ) The petitioner's relationship to the matters involved in the proceedings, and
( b ) The nature of the presentation which the peititioner would make.
[49 FR 10637, Mar. 21, 1984, as amended at 86 FR 1780, Jan. 11, 2021]
# Gomputer

# Test Report U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT]ON 

### Federal 

## Aviation Administrati-on Airman Knowledge 

## Test Report

SCORE

## z 82 GRADE: PASS Leaming stotemeot codes ligted below repterent inconrctly onrwered que*ionr. Learning sfiilemeot soder EDdfhsb{osoctsed statem€nr can be found atww.frr.gov/trrldng_tcdtrg/tcrdDg/rtmcn. Reference material associated with the leaming statemsot codea can be fouod in 6e appopries knowbilgs rBr gulde et www.fre.gov/trehlng-tesdng/tectlng/ehmen/tert3uld:r. A single code may represeol more than one iu*orreel resporroe, 

### PLTOI2 PLTO13 PLTO23 PLTO64 PLTO91 PLT1O1 

### PLT]-25 PLT155 PLT342 PLT37T PLT37

### 6 . NAME: 

### JUDYCKI, JEFFREY J APPLICANT

## ID: 02021983 EXAM: 

## Private Pilot Airplane (PAR) EXAM DATEz 

### L2/73/2014

EXPTRAT]ON DATE: 

### t2/31/2016

Name EXAM 

## ID: 501213207404693L9 EXAM

### SITE: LAS50104 

### TAKE: 1



### EfiBis sed 

### ^.- S.GI 

### :'\ -: ''.- CTD's . AUTHORIZED INSTRUCTOR'S STATEMENT: 

## (If applicable) 

## On (date) I gave

## the above named 

## appJ-icant hours 

## of adcll-EIbnal--Tnstruction, 

### covering each 

## subject area shovrn

## to be 

## deficient, and 

### consider 

## the applicant competent

## to pass

## the test. (Prinf-EGarly) Signature FRAUDULENT ALTERATION OF

### THIS FORM BY OR REVOCATION OFANY CERTIEICATES OR 

### THIS INFORMAT]ON 

### ]S PROTECTED 

### BY THE 

### Initial 

## Cert. No. Type



## IS A BASIS FOR SUSPENSION 

### BY THAT PERSON. FOR 

### OFFICIAL USE ONLY. ANY PERSON RATINGS HELD PRIVACY ACT. 

## E

## THIS RE

PSI 

### Service LLC 

### 800-2Ll-21 

### 53

## or 360-8 

### 96-9171 www.

### lasergrade. com 

## Applicant Locator: JUPAO639 

### Testi-ng 

### provided 

## by: LAS60104 

### American Elyers 3N040 

### Powis Road 

### West Chi-cago, 

### TL 60185 630-58 4-41 00
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            Section 906 Certification
                            -------------------------

     The  following  statement  is  provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form  10-Q  of  the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002  (18  U.S.C.  1350).

     The  undersigned  certifies  that  the  foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully
complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m)  and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  the  MLM  Index  Fund.


August 15, 2005


/s/ James A. Mehling
-------------------------------------------
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund


                                        1
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.21 Ineligible list. ( a ) Upon the final decision of the Administrative Law Judge or Administrative Review Board, as appropriate, the Administrator shall within 90 days forward to the Comptroller General the name of any respondent found in violation of the Service Contract Act, including the name of any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which the respondent has a substantial interest, unless such decision orders relief from the ineligible list because of unusual circumstances.
( b ) Upon the final decision of the Administrative Law Judge or the Administrative Review Board, as appropriate, the Administrator promptly shall forward to the Comptroller General the name of any respondent found to be in aggravated or willful violation of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, and the name of any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which the respondent has a substantial interest.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1326-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Maine, (FEMA-1326-DR), dated April 28, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 18, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster for the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 28, 2000: 

Piscataquis County for Public Assistance 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Robert J. Adamcik, 

Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 00-13325 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Kaycee irrigation project, Johnson County, Wyoming

By: Francis Anthony KohoutF. H. Rainwater

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1360E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 784.2 Matters discussed in this part.

This part discusses generally the provisions of the Act which govern its application to employers and employees in enterprises and establishments of the fisheries, seafood processing, and related industries. It discusses in some detail those exemption provisions of the Act in sections 13(a)(5) and 13(b)(4) which refer specifically to employees employed in described activities with respect to seafood and other forms of aquatic life.