alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 205 

Designating June 2007 as ‘‘National Internet Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2007 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. VITTER, 

Mr. CRAIG, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mr. OBAMA, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. BAYH, 

Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. DOMENICI) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 2007 as ‘‘National Internet Safety 

Month’’. 

Whereas there are more than 1,000,000,000 Internet users 

worldwide; 

Whereas, in the United States, 35,000,000 children in kindergarten through grade 12 have Internet access; 

Whereas approximately 80 percent of the children of the 

United States in grades 5 through 12 are online for at 

least 1 hour per week; 

Whereas approximately 41 percent of students in grades 5 

through 12 do not share with their parents what they do 

on the Internet; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 205 ATS 

Whereas approximately 24 percent of students in grades 5 

through 12 have hidden their online activities from their 

parents; 

Whereas approximately 31 percent of the students in grades 

5 through 12 have the skill to circumvent Internet filter 

software; 

Whereas 61 percent of the students admit to using the Internet unsafely or inappropriately; 

Whereas 20 percent of middle school and high school students have met face-to-face with someone they first met 

online; 

Whereas 23 percent of students know someone who has been 

bullied online; 

Whereas 56 percent of parents feel that online bullying of 

children is an issue that needs to be addressed; 

Whereas 47 percent of parents feel that their ability to monitor and shelter their children from inappropriate material on the Internet is limited; and 

Whereas 61 percent of parents want to be more personally 

involved with Internet safety: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates June 2007 as ‘‘National Internet 

3 Safety Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that National Internet Safety 

5 Month provides the citizens of the United States 

6 with an opportunity to learn more about— 

7 (A) the dangers of the Internet; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 205 ATS 

1 (B) the importance of being safe and re2 sponsible online; 

3 (3) commends and recognizes national and com4 munity organizations for— 

5 (A) promoting awareness of the dangers of 

6 the Internet; and 

7 (B) providing information and training 

8 that develops critical thinking and decision9 making skills that are needed to use the Inter10 net safely; and 

11 (4) calls on Internet safety organizations, law 

12 enforcement, educators, community leaders, parents, 

13 and volunteers to increase their efforts to raise the 

14 level of awareness for the need for online safety in 

15 the United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### § 780.704 Dependence of exemption on nature of employing establishment.

If an employee is to be exempt under section 13(b)(14), he must be employed by an “establishment” which is “commonly recognized as a country elevator.” If he is employed by such an establishment, the fact that it may be part of a larger enterprise which also engages in activities that are not recognized as those of country elevators (see *Tobin* v. *Flour Mills,* 185 F. 2d 596) would not make the exemption inapplicable.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, February 2, 2011; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

 Closed to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: January 25, 2011.

Todd A Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-2036 Filed 1-26-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 273 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 273

   Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Postal 
  Service should issue a semipostal stamp to support medical research 
                    relating to Alzheimer's disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2007

Ms. Mikulski submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
      the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Postal 
  Service should issue a semipostal stamp to support medical research 
                    relating to Alzheimer's disease.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the United States 
Postal Service should, in accordance with section 416 of title 39, 
United States Code--
            (1) issue a semipostal stamp to support medical research 
        relating to Alzheimer's disease; and
            (2) transfer to the National Institutes of Health for that 
        purpose any amounts becoming available from the sale of such 
        stamp.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Daniel H. Leever, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MacDermid, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  September 28, 2004                 /s/ Daniel H. Leever
       --------------                     --------------------
       for the amended form 10-K/A       Name: Daniel H. Leever
       certifying the report as of     Title: Chairman, President and
       March 15, 2004, date of             Chief Executive Officer
       original filing
EXHIBIT 23.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-130763, Form S-8 No. 333-91192 and Form S-3 No. 333-169540) previously filed by The LGL Group, Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2011, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of The LGL Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP




Roseland, New Jersey


March 23, 2011
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report Amendment No. 2 of Big Sky Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce Gaston, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  December 2, 2005

By: /s/ Bruce Gaston

Name:  Bruce Gaston

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
API Meeting Summary

TO:    EPA Docket No. EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2010‐0682

FROM: Brenda Shine, U.S.EPA, OAQPS/SPPD/Refining and Chemicals Group

(E143‐01)

PARTICIPANTS: EPA:  Janet McCabe, Joe Goffman, Peter Tsirigotis, Mike Koerber, Brenda

Shine

API: Matt Todd, Khary Cauthen, John Wagner, Barbara Ehimika, Chuck

Feerick (API Contractor: Advanced Network Solutions)  

DATE OF MEETING: August 21, 2014

SUBJECT:    Discuss the Proposed Standards of the Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule

On August 21, 2014, API met with EPA OAR senior management to discuss aspects of the

Refinery Residual Risk and Technology Review as presented in the attached meeting agenda.
API Meeting with EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe

Refinery Risk & Technology Review Proposed Rule - August 21, 2014

EPA Policy Implications on Safety Equipment

 Flares and atmospheric Pressure Relief Devices (PRDs) are critical safety equipment. The proposed rule conflicts with the ability 

to operate this equipment as designed

o The rule prohibits the use of atmospheric PRDs in HAPs service, and sets unachievable and unnecessary velocity and smoke 

limits for existing flares

o The associated cost, operational, and environmental implications of the prohibition and new flare limits are not addressed

(~300 new flares would be required at a cost of ~ $10+ billion) 

API Requests EPA:

 Implement work practices (root cause/corrective action) to minimize potential for PRD releases

 Eliminate unnecessary restrictions (e.g. flare velocity and smoke requirements) 

Risk and Technology Review

 EPA’s cost estimates are unrealistic and not reflective of the industry (i.e., $240 million vs. >$2.5 billion)

 The rule adds significant costs for compliance assurance with no associated emission reduction

o For example, flare requirements (dual limits, automatic pilot ignition, opacity monitoring), PRD monitoring, fenceline 

monitoring

API Requests EPA:

 Maintain the existing coker floor; any revision, based on 112(d)(6), must consider cost and, thus, be no more restrictive 

than the recent NSPS Ja (i.e., 5 psig)

 Establish simplified flare standards for steam-assisted flares that assure high combustion efficiency (i.e., CZNHV of 200 

btu/scf) without demanding the unnecessary combustion of supplemental natural gas, expensive GC analyzers, and 

automatic pilot ignition
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-17-00756- CV
In re Bobby Wayn e Mc Kissack, Indivi dual ly and as Co-Age nt and Attor ney in Fac t for Joe Ann McK

issack and Bobb y Wilson McK issack, and Eric Mc Kissack, Indivi dual ly and as Co-Age nt and Attor ney in Fac t for Joe Ann McK issack and Bobb y Wilson McK issack

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM CO MAL CO UNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relators Bobby Way

ne McKissac k and Eric McKi s sack, I ndividually and as Co- Age n t s and Attorney s in Fa ct for J oe Ann McKissac k and Bobby Wil son McKissac k, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challeng ing an anti-suit injunction issued by the 274th District Court of C omal County

. We conclude Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief

. See In re J.B. Hunt Transport , Inc. , 492 S.W .3d 287, 294 (Tex. 2016) (“The g ener al common law rule in Texas is that the court in which suit is first filed acqui re s d o m i nant jurisdiction to the exclusion of other coordina te courts.” (quoting Curtis v. Gibbs , 511 S.W .2d 263, 267 (Tex. 1974))) ; Gannon v. Payne , 706 S.W .2d 304, 305-06 (Tex. 1986) (“[W] hen a suit is filed in a court of competent jurisdiction, that court is entitled to proce ed to judgme nt and may protec t its jurisdiction by enjoining the parties to a suit subsequently fi l ed i n an o t h er court of this state.”) ; In re Henry , 274 S.W .3d 185, 189 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, pet. denied) (“Te x as state courts have the power to restra in persons from proce eding with suits filed in other courts of this state by g rantingan ‘anti-suit injunction,’ abating p ro ce edings in a second forum.”)

. Acc ording ly , we deny the

petition for writ of manda mus. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland Filed: January

24, 2018

2
EXHIBIT 32.1   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MGE Energy, Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. WolterGary J. Wolter
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 26, 2009
### Geology and ground water of the Red Lake area, Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona and New Mexico

By: J. P. AkersN. E. McClymondsJohn William Harshbarger

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1576B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 1 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ROBERT L. SIEDSMA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-3216

(D.C. No. 95-10034)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Siedsma appeals from his conviction upon a plea of guilty of possession with

intent to distribute methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 110

months imprisonment and now appeals based upon ineffective assistance of counsel. His 

claim is based on counsel’s prediction of a base offense level of 28, whereas the base

offense level used for sentencing was 32. The appeal must be dismissed because the
- 2 -

ineffectiveness claim must be brought in collateral proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

See United States v. Galloway, 56 F.3d 1239, 1242 (10th Cir. 1995) (en banc). This is

not one of those rare ineffectiveness claims that may be reviewed on direct appeal,

particularly given that Mr. Siedsma is represented on appeal by counsel below. See

Beaulieu v. United States, 930 F.2d 805, 807 (10th Cir. 1991). All pending motions are

DENIED. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 237 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 237

 Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Day of Remembrance for 
                            Murder Victims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2007

 Mr. Cornyn submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Day of Remembrance for 
                            Murder Victims.

Whereas the death of a loved one is a devastating experience, and the murder of 
        a loved one is exceptionally difficult;
Whereas the friends and families of murder victims cope with grief through a 
        variety of support services, including counseling, crisis intervention, 
        professional referrals, and assistance in dealing with the criminal 
        justice system; and
Whereas the designation of a National Day of Remembrance For Murder Victims on 
        September 25 of each year provides an opportunity for the people of the 
        United States to honor the memories of murder victims and to recognize 
        the impact on surviving family members: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a National Day of 
        Remembrance for Murder Victims; and
            (2) recognizes the significant benefits offered by the 
        organizations that provide services to the loved ones of murder 
        victims.
                                 <all>
```