alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The head of each agency shall collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the six-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, shall be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters shall be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order shall be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation shall be submitted on May 31, 1990, and shall contain a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies, designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), are required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives no later than with the compilations due on May 31, 1991. OMB shall provide detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) Non-major agencies are requested to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
( h ) Agencies shall keep the originals of all disclosure reports in the official files of the agency.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com July 30

, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC Exemption Request Under

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC an operator of

Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service photography

and v ideography

, seeks exemption f rom the following listed Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Inspire within the National Airspace

System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, aerial photography and videography of exterior

buildin g inspections, Real Estate Properties (for homeowners, realtors, home builders,

home contractors and / or home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspection of

home exteriors), aerial surveying and mapping, precision agriculture, and filming of

speci al events over certain areas of the United States, conducted within and under the

conditions outlined herein, or as may be established by the FAA, as required by Section

333 requirements.

Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27( a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c),

91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC h as requested that the FAA not request public comment on

its petition because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is

identical to numerous exemptions granted previously by the FAA . 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition

, Cleveland Aerial Media, LLC will be utilizing the s ame DJI Inspire pr oven

technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved in numerous previously

approved exemptions. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany ClevelandUASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com Aerial Media, LLC ’ s Sec tion 333 Petition is included. Combined, th eir comp rehensive

Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to their chosen

products and th e technology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a

S ummary G rant of Cleveland Aerial Media , LLC ’ s Section 333 Petition and expedite the

process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
§ 780.118 “Harvesting.” ( a ) The term “Harvesting” as used in section 3(f) includes all operations customarily performed in connection with the removal of the crops by the farmer from their growing position (*Holtville Alfalfa Mills* v. *Wyatt,* 230 F. 2d 398; *NLRB* v. *Olaa Sugar Co.,* 242 F. 2d 714). Examples include the cutting of grain, the picking of fruit, the stripping of bluegrass seed, and the digging up of shrubs and trees grown in a nursery. Employees engaged on a plantation in gathering sugarcane as soon as it has been cut, loading it, and transporting the cane to a concentration point on the farm are engaged in “Harvesting” (*Vives* v. *Serralles,* 145 F. 2d 552).
( b ) The combining of grain is exempt either as harvesting or as a practice performed on a farm in conjunction with or as an incident to farming operations. (See in this connection *Holtville Alfalfa Mills* v. *Wyatt,* 230 F. 2d 398.) “Harvesting” does not extend to operations subsequent to and unconnected with the actual process whereby agricultural or horticultural commodities are severed from their attachment to the soil or otherwise reduced to possession. For example, the processing of sugarcane into raw sugar (*Bowie* v. *Gonzalez,* 117 F. 2d 11, and see *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254), or the vining of peas are not included. For a further discussion on vining employees, see § 780.139. While transportation to a concentration point on the farm may be included, “harvesting” never extends to transportation or other operations off the farm. Off-the-farm transportation can only be “agriculture” when performed by the farmer as an incident to his farming operations (*Chapman* v. *Durkin,* 214 F. 2d 360 cert. denied 348 U.S. 897; *Fort Mason Fruit Co.* v. *Durkin,* 214 F. 2d 363 cert. denied 348 U.S. 897). For further discussion of this point, see §§ 780.144 through 780.147; §§ 780.152 through 780.157.
§ 106.200 Owner or operator. ( a ) Each OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the OCS facility operates in compliance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) For each OCS facility, the OCS facility owner or operator must: ( 1 ) Define the security organizational structure for each OCS facility and provide each person exercising security duties or responsibilities within that structure the support needed to fulfill those obligations;
( 2 ) Designate in writing, by name or title, a Company Security Officer (CSO) and a Facility Security Officer (FSO) for each OCS facility and identify how those officers can be contacted at any time;
( 3 ) Ensure that a Facility Security Assessment (FSA) is conducted;
( 4 ) Ensure the development and submission for approval of a Facility Security Plan (FSP);
( 5 ) Ensure that the OCS facility operates in compliance with the approved FSP;
( 6 ) Ensure that the TWIC Program is properly implemented as set forth in this subchapter, including: ( i ) Ensuring that only individuals who hold a TWIC and are authorized to be in the secure area are permitted to escort; and
( ii ) Identifying what action is to be taken by an escort, or other authorized individual, should individuals under escort engage in activities other than those for which escorted access was granted.
( 7 ) Ensure that adequate coordination of security issues takes place between OCS facilities and vessels, including the execution of a Declaration of Security (DoS) as required by this part;
( 8 ) Ensure, within 12 hours of notification of an increase in MARSEC level, implementation of the additional security measures required by the FSP for the new MARSEC level;
( 9 ) Ensure all breaches of security and security incidents are reported in accordance with the requirements in part 101 of this subchapter;
( 10 ) Ensure consistency between security requirements and safety requirements;
( 11 ) Inform OCS facility personnel of their responsibility to apply for and maintain a TWIC, including the deadlines and methods for such applications, and of their obligation to inform TSA of any event that would render them ineligible for a TWIC, or which would invalidate their existing TWIC;
( 12 ) Ensure that protocols consistent with § 101.550 of this subchapter, for dealing with individuals requiring access who report a lost, damaged, or stolen TWIC, or who have applied for and not yet received a TWIC, are in place; and
( 13 ) If applicable, ensure that protocols consistent with § 106.262 of this part, for dealing with newly hired employees who have applied for and not yet received a TWIC, are in place.
[USCG-2003-14759, 68 FR 39345, July 1, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60558, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 3585, Jan. 25, 2007; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016]
----

----

III Bekendmakingen

Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau

----

AANWERVING VOOR HET EUROPEES GENEESMIDDELENBUREAU (LONDEN)

(2004/C 289 A/01)

Het Bureau is belast met de coördinatie van de beoordeling van en het toezicht op geneesmiddelen voor menselijk en diergeneeskundig gebruik in de Europese Gemeenschap (zie Verordening (EEG) nr. 2309/93 van de Raad — Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 214 van 24 augustus 1993 — en Verordening (EG) nr. 726/2004 van de Raad — Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie L 136 van 30 april 2004). Het Bureau, dat in januari 1995 is opgericht, staat in nauw contact met de Europese Commissie, de 25 EU-lidstaten, de EER-landen en tal van groeperingen in de openbare en particuliere sector.

Nadere informatie over het Bureau en zijn activiteiten is te vinden op internet op het webadres http://www.emea.eu.int.

Het Europees Geneesmiddelenbureau organiseert selectieprocedures met het oog op het vaststellen van reservelijsten voor de volgende functies:

Geselecteerde sollicitanten worden op een reservelijst geplaatst; afhankelijk van de begrotingsmiddelen kan hun een contract van vijf jaar, met mogelijkheid tot verlenging, worden aangeboden, overeenkomstig de Regeling welke van toepassing is op de andere personeelsleden van de Europese Gemeenschappen (1) (Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 56 van 4 maart 1968).

De standplaats is Londen.

Sollicitanten moeten onderdaan zijn van een lidstaat van de Europese Unie, IJsland, Noorwegen of Liechtenstein, op voorwaarde dat zij in het bezit zijn van al hun rechten als staatsburger.

Alle voorwaarden, de taakomschrijvingen en het benodigde sollicitatieformulier moeten gedownload worden van de website van het Bureau: http://www.emea.eu.int/. Het volledig ingevulde formulier moet van een datum, handtekening en de nodige bewijsstukken worden voorzien en uiterlijk op 7 januari 2005 (het poststempel geldt als bewijs) worden gezonden naar:EMEA, Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (Tel. (44-207) 418 84 00; fax (44-207) 418 84 16).

----

(1)  De Raad heeft een nieuw statuut goedgekeurd dat op 1 mei 2004 van kracht is geworden en waarin een nieuwe loopbaanstructuur is vastgelegd. De geselecteerde kandidaten worden bijgevolg aangeworven op basis van dit nieuwe statuut overeenkomstig de regeling zoals weergegeven in met name artikel 12 van deel 2 van bijlage XIII (zie de IntraComm-website: http://www.europa.eu.int).

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The
Board of Directors
Summa Industries:

We
consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated October 7, 2002, with respect to the balance sheet of Summa Industries as of August 31, 2002, and the related
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the fiscal year 2002 annual report on Form 10-K, for the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the Company's 1984 and 1991 Stock Option Plans, filed on April 15, 1993, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed
on January 31, 1997 (No. 333-20835), the amendment to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68921), the 1999 Stock Option
Plan, filed on December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68981), the amendment to the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on May 3, 2002 (No. 333-87692), the Summa ESOP
and 401(k) Stock Option Plan, filed on September 8, 1997 (No. 333-35163), the Calnetics Stock Option Plan, filed on October 21, 1997
(No. 333-38415), the Falcon Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68983), the Plastron Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on
May 20, 1999 (No. 333-78873), the Plastic Specialties, Inc. Acquisition Stock Option Plan filed on May 3, 2002 (No. 333-87690), and the
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-4 pertaining to the LexaLite Stock Option Plan, filed on September 9, 1996 (No. 333-11571), with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933.

/s/
KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP

Los
Angeles, California
October 30, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Argued and submitted January 29,

remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed March 3, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DAVID STANLEY WEAVER, *Appellant.*

(91CR1775; CA A72790)

847 P2d 416

Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*495PER CURIAM

Defendant seeks modification of his sentence requiring reimbursement for court-appointed attorney fees in excess of the amount actually expended by the state. The trial court ordered defendant to pay $1,360 in attorney fees. However, the state concedes that the cost of his representation was only $310 and that it can recover only the amount actually expended. *State v. Guzek,*89 Or App 567, 568, 749 P2d 618 (1988). We accept the state’s concession and, accordingly, remand.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 23, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Northwest Financial Corp., Spencer, Iowa; to acquire at least 
98.49 percent of the voting shares of Marquette Bank Oelwein, N.A., 
Oelwein, Iowa.


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 25, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-13604 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
exh_413.htm


Exhibit 4.13


English Translation for Reference







POWER OF ATTORNEY


 


I, ____________, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) with the Chinese ID card No.: _______________________, is the shareholder of Shenzhen Xinbao Investment Management Co., Ltd.  (“Shenzhen Xinbao”), holding _______% equity interest of Shenzhen Xinbao. I hereby irrevocably appoint Bao Si Kang Information Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Bao Si Kang”) to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney:


 


I hereby authorize the person designated by Bao Si Kang which it thinks fit to represent me with full power to exercise all voting rights of shareholder to which I shall be entitled in accordance with PRC laws and Shenzhen Xinbao’s Articles at shareholders’ meetings of Shenzhen Xinbao, including but not limited to the right to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest in Shenzhen Xinbao, to vote on all important matters of Shenzhen Xinbao as my authorized representative at its shareholders’ meetings, and to elect and appoint the directors and officers of Shenzhen Xinbao, etc. I will issue a power of attorney to the person designated by Bao Si Kang from time to time as per its request so as to facilitate the designee with full power to exercise all voting rights of shareholder at shareholders’ meetings of Shenzhen Xinbao on my behalf.


 


If Bao Si Kang designates me to attend a shareholders’ meeting of Shenzhen Xinbao, I promise that I will exercise the voting rights of shareholder according to the instructions of Bao Si Kang.


 


During the validly existing period of Shenzhen Xinbao and within the term of the Loan Agreement executed by myself and Bao Si Kang, this Power of Attorney shall have a term of ten (10) years from the execution date of this Power of Attorney.


 


 



	 	Signatory: __________________
	 	 
	 	Date: _____________________
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 255 

Recognizing and supporting the long distance runs that will take place in 

the People’s Republic of China in 2007 and the United States in 2008 

to promote friendship between the peoples of China and the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2007 

Mr. ISAKSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting the long distance runs that will 

take place in the People’s Republic of China in 2007 

and the United States in 2008 to promote friendship 

between the peoples of China and the United States. 

Whereas, in 1984, American long distance runner Stan 

Cottrell of Tucker, Georgia, was welcomed into the People’s Republic of China where he completed the 2,125- 

mile Great Friendship Run along the Great Wall of 

China in 53 days, an event which was chronicled in the 

international press and serves as a sign of international 

friendship; 

Whereas those involved in the Great Friendship Run over 2 

decades ago are committed to running again to revisit the 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 255 IS 

experience and to promote friendship between the peoples 

of China and the United States; 

Whereas in China, a 2,200-mile run from the Great Wall of 

China to Hong Kong will take place October 15 to December 15, 2007; 

Whereas in the United States, a 4,000-mile relay style run 

from San Francisco, California, to the United States 

Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., will take place 

May 7 to June 20, 2008, and cross the continent; and 

Whereas 3 Chinese long distance runners will participate with 

Stan Cottrell and others in the run to take place in the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and supports 

2 the long distance runs that will take place in the People’s 

3 Republic of China in 2007 and the United States in 2008 

4 to promote friendship between the peoples of China and 

5 the United States. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/21

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL