alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 780.103 “Agriculture” as defined by the Act.

Section 3(f) of the Act defines “agriculture” as follows:

“Agriculture” includes farming in all its branches and among other things includes the cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural commodities (including commodities defined as agricultural commodities in section 15(g) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, as amended), the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, or poultry, and any practices (including any forestry or lumbering operations) performed by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, including preparation for market, delivery to storage or to market or to carriers for transportation to market.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rampart Capital Corporation
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"),  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof,  each  of  I Charles W. Janke, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer  of  the  Company,  I James H. Carpenter, Chief Operating Officer of the
Company,  and  I  Charles  F.  Presley,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify  separately  and  independently,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Sec.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

          1.   The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as amended; and

          2.   The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/  C. W. JANKE                                             May 14, 2003
     C. W. Janke
     Chairman of the Board
     Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)


By:  /s/ J. H. CARPENTER                                         May 14, 2003
     J. H. Carpenter
     President
     Chief Operating Officer


By:  /s/ CHARLES F. PRESLEY                                      May 14, 2003
     Charles F. Presley
     Vice-President
     Chief Financial Officer
     Treasurer
     (Principal Financial Officer)

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Rampart Capital Corporation and will be retained by Rampart Capital
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  request.


<PAGE>
#### § 780.303 Exemption applicable on employee basis.

Section 13(a)(6)(A) exempts “any employee employed in agriculture * * * by an employer * * *.” It is clear from this language that it is the activities of the employee rather than those of his employer which determine the application of the exemption. In other words, the exemption applies only to employees who are engaged in agricultural activities. Thus some employees of the employer may be exempt while others may not. In any case the burden of effecting segregation between exempt and nonexempt work as between different groups of employees is upon the employer. For a more detailed discussion of what constitutes employment in agriculture, see subpart B of this part.
Date: July 6, 2015 

To: Sharon Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD 

From: Kristin Sroka, RTI International 

Subject: Documentation of June 25, 2015 Call with Brick Industry Representatives 

I. Introduction 

On June 25, 2015, representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

and their contractor (RTI International) participated in a conference call with representatives of 

the Brick Industry Association (BIA). The purpose of the call was to discuss startup and 

shutdown provisions and additional test data to be used for the national emission standards for 

hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for brick and structural clay products (BSCP) 

manufacturing. 

II. Attendees and Affiliations 

Industry Representatives 

Garth Tayler, Acme Brick 

Terry Schimmel, Boral Bricks Inc. 

Susan Miller, Brick Industry Association (BIA) 

Paul Regina, BIA 

Warren Paschal, General Shale 

John Sanders, National Brick Research Center 

EPA Representatives 

Keith Barnett 

Sharon Nizich 

Theresa Lowe 

RTI International 

Kristin Sroka
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41072 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FRANCISCO CAMACHO-BARAJAS, also known as Alfonso Alvarez-Garcia Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-749-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco CamachoBarajas has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a briefin accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Camacho-Barajas has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this ti me of Camacho-Barajas’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. SeeUnited Statesv. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent reviewNo. 06-41072

2 of the record, counsel’s brief, and Camacho-Barajas’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 27 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Purple Heart 

Recognition Day’’. 

Whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military decoration in 

the world in present use; 

Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the 

President of the United States to members of the Armed 

Forces who are wounded in a conflict with an enemy 

force or are wounded while held by an enemy force as 

prisoners of war, and is awarded posthumously to the 

next of kin of members of the Armed Forces who are 

killed in a conflict with an enemy force or who die of 

wounds received in a conflict with an enemy force; 

Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 

1782, during the Revolutionary War, when General 

George Washington issued an order establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the 

Badge of Military Merit; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

SCON 27 RFH 

Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end 

of the Revolutionary War, but was revived in 1932, the 

200th anniversary of George Washington’s birth, out of 

respect for his memory and military achievements; and 

Whereas observing National Purple Heart Recognition Day is 

a fitting tribute to George Washington and to the more 

than 1,535,000 recipients of the Purple Heart, approximately 550,000 of whom are still living: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

4 Purple Heart Recognition Day’’; 

5 (2) encourages all people in the United States 

6 to learn about the history of the Purple Heart and 

7 to honor its recipients; and 

8 (3) calls upon the people of the United States 

9 to conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and 

10 programs to demonstrate support for members of 

11 the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Pur12 ple Heart. 

Passed the Senate July 16, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
§ 810.700 Administrative review procedures. ( a ) *Initiation of review.* Upon receipt from CBP of a notice of a protest filed under 19 U.S.C. 1514 that meets the requirements of the regulations at 19 CFR part 174 and relates to the Department's analysis of the high-wage components of the LVC requirements, the Department will conduct an administrative review of its initial analysis.
( b ) *Procedure for review.* Review of the Department's analysis will be conducted by the Administrator, or the Administrator's designee, as the presiding official. When a presiding official is designated by the Administrator, the official must rank higher than the official who issued the decision that is the subject of the protest.
( c ) *Proceeding before an administrative law judge.* In any case where the presiding official determines, in the discretion of that official, that it is appropriate, and there exist disputed questions of fact, the presiding official may refer those questions to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for a recommended decision. ( 1 ) Upon receipt from the Administrator, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall designate an administrative law judge to hear the disputed questions of fact.
( 2 ) Hearings held under this subpart shall be conducted under the Department's rules of practice and procedure for administrative hearings found in 29 CFR part 18.
( 3 ) The recommended decision of the administrative law judge shall be issued within 120 days of when the Administrator referred the questions of fact to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, or longer with consent of the parties.
( 4 ) The recommended decision shall be limited to a determination of the questions of fact presented by the Administrator, and shall include a statement of findings and recommendations, with reasons and bases therefore, for each question of fact presented by the Administrator.
( 5 ) The Administrator shall have discretion to accept or reject the findings of the administrative law judge in full or in part.
( d ) *Scope of review.* The presiding official, in a review under paragraph (b) of this section, shall have the discretion to consider any evidence relevant to rendering a determination under this section. In the event that new evidence or a new legal argument is made by the protestor in a review under paragraph (b) of this section, the presiding official may request additional information from the protestor, and/or additional verification by WHD.
( e ) *Time frame for review.* The Administrator will strive to issue a decision under this section within 1 year from the date the Administrator receives the notice of protest from CBP. This timeframe does not include the time during which any additional verification or collection of additional information may take place in response, for example, to newly raised issues.
( f ) *Results of review.* After considering the relevant evidence and issues, the Administrator shall provide a determination containing the results of the administrative review to CBP.
Order entered March 2, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00428-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.F.D. AND T.Z.D., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-19199

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 26, 2021 “Affidavit of Fact 

Declaration of Truth.” In the document, appellant states that the Court is required 

to provide a “written rebuttal to me, in kind, specific to each and every point of the 

subject matter stated herein, within 15 days, via your own sworn and notarized 

affidavit, using fact, valid law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific 

subject matter stating in this Affidavit/Declaration.” We construe the document as 

a motion. We DENY the motion.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
AIDD Developmental Disabilities Councils (DDC) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2013 Annual Allocation

6/11/2013

State/Territory

AIDD 

Developmental 

Disabilities 

Councils (DDC)

Alabama $1,280,763

Alaska $451,553

Arizona $1,392,777

Arkansas $752,346

California $6,496,150

Colorado $859,459

Connecticut $681,469

Delaware $451,553

District of Columbia $451,553

Florida $3,499,415

Georgia $2,041,448

Hawaii $451,553

Idaho $451,553

Illinois $2,477,331

Indiana $1,409,080

Iowa $730,126

Kansas $579,619

Kentucky $1,195,739

Louisiana $1,328,158

Maine $451,553

Maryland $950,796

Massachusetts $1,320,431

Michigan $2,439,721

Minnesota $966,956

Mississippi $906,239

Missouri $1,294,246

Montana $451,553

Nebraska $451,553

Nevada $469,007

New Hampshire $451,553

New Jersey $1,492,899

New Mexico $479,397

New York $4,107,730

North Carolina $1,998,086

North Dakota $451,553

Ohio $2,695,852

Oklahoma $846,197

Oregon $781,744

Pennsylvania $2,958,678

Rhode Island $451,553

South Carolina $1,073,121

South Dakota $451,553

Tennessee $1,426,128

Texas $4,794,740

Utah $637,622

Vermont $451,553

Virginia $1,416,470

Washington $1,183,050

West Virginia $740,372

Wisconsin $1,224,785

Wyoming $451,553

American Samoa $235,156

Guam $235,156

Northern Mariana Islands $235,156

Puerto Rico $2,364,288

Virgin Islands $235,156

TOTAL $70,554,801
**Exhibit 99.3****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,    as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison  Gas and Electric Company for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),  I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company.  /s/ Gary J. Wolter   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  March 26, 2003
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 105 

Designating September 2007 as ‘‘Campus Fire Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2007 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and 

Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2007 as ‘‘Campus Fire Safety 

Month’’. 

Whereas tragic fires in student housing in Nebraska, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania have cut short the 

lives of college students in the United States; 

Whereas, since January 2000, at least 99 people, including 

students, parents, and children, have died in campus-related fires; 

Whereas more than 75 percent of those deaths occurred in 

off-campus occupancies; 

Whereas a majority of the students in the United States live 

in off-campus occupancies; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 105 IS 

Whereas a number of fatal fires have occurred in buildings 

in which the fire safety systems have been compromised 

or disabled by the occupants; 

Whereas automatic fire alarm systems provide the early 

warning of a fire that is necessary for occupants and the 

fire department to take appropriate action; 

Whereas automatic fire sprinkler systems are a highly effective method for controlling or extinguishing a fire in its 

early stages and protecting the lives of the building’s occupants; 

Whereas many students are living in off-campus occupancies, 

sorority and fraternity housing, and residence halls that 

are not adequately protected with automatic fire alarm 

systems and automatic fire sprinkler systems; 

Whereas fire safety education is an effective method of reducing the occurrence of fires and the resulting loss of life 

and property damage; 

Whereas students are not routinely receiving effective fire 

safety education throughout their entire college careers; 

Whereas it is vital to educate future generations in the 

United States about the importance of fire safety to help 

ensure the safety of young people during their college 

years and beyond; and 

Whereas by educating a generation of adults about fire safety, future loss of life from fires may be significantly reduced: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2007 as ‘‘Campus 

3 Fire Safety Month’’; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 105 IS 

1 (2) encourages administrators of institutions of 

2 higher education and municipalities— 

3 (A) to provide educational programs about 

4 fire safety to all students during ‘‘Campus Fire 

5 Safety Month’’ and throughout the school year; 

6 (B) to evaluate the level of fire safety 

7 being provided in both on- and off-campus stu8 dent housing; and 

9 (C) to take the necessary steps to ensure 

10 fire-safe living environments through fire safety 

11 education, installation of fire suppression and 

12 detection systems, and the development and en13 forcement of applicable codes relating to fire 

14 safety. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Opinion issued August 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00125-CR

———————————

THOMAS LEE MCDANIEL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1527579

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Thomas Lee McDaniel, Jr., has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal 

in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the 

appeal. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARSH
SUPERMARKETS' 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                          33,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,053
<INVENTORY>                                     98,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,033
<PP&E>                                         387,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 460,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,603
<BONDS>                                        212,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,429<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   460,039
<SALES>                                      1,505,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,505,133
<CGS>                                        1,132,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,454,273<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,278)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73<F3>
<FN>
<F1>NUMBER OF CLASS A AND CLASS B SHARES OUTSTANDING.
<F2>INCLUDES (I) $1,132,296 OF COST OF GOODS SOLD (ITEM 5-03(B)2(A) OF REGULATION
S-X) AND (II) $321,977 OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (ITEM
5-03(B)4 OF REGULATION S-X).
<F3>MULTIPLIER IS 1 FOR PER SHARE DATA.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>