5078 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

activities are authorized, provided that 

persons subject to the jurisdiction of the 

United States ensure that they are not 

engaging, without separate 

authorization, in the activities identified 

in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this 

section: 

* * * * * 

Dated: January 25, 2011. 

Adam J. Szubin, 

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1969 Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0850; FRL–9258–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Wisconsin; The Milwaukee-Racine and 

Sheboygan Areas; Determination of 

Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone 

Standard; Withdrawal of Direct Final 

Rule 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an 

adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing 

the December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78164), 

direct final rule making determinations 

under the Clean Air Act that the 

Milwaukee-Racine and Sheboygan, 

Wisconsin areas have attained the 1997 

8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard. The MilwaukeeRacine area includes Milwaukee, 

Ozaukee, Racine, Washington, 

Waukesha, and Kenosha Counties. The 

Sheboygan area includes Sheboygan 

County. In the direct final rule, EPA 

stated that if adverse comments were 

submitted by January 14, 2011, the rule 

would be withdrawn and not take effect. 

On January 14, 2011, EPA received a 

comment. EPA believes this comment is 

adverse and, therefore, EPA is 

withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA 

will address the comment in a 

subsequent final action based upon the 

proposed action also published on 

December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78197. EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. 

DATES: The direct final rule published at 

75 FR 78164 on December 15, 2010, is 

withdrawn as of January 28, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental 

Engineer, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–1767, 

dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: January 19, 2011. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

Accordingly, the amendment to 40 

CFR 52.2585 published in the Federal 

Register on December 15, 2010 (75 FR 

78164) on page 78167 is withdrawn as 

of January 28, 2011. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1770 Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0663–201061; FRL– 

9259–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans: 

Tennessee; Approval of Section 

110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 

1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards for the 

Nashville, TN, Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to 

approve a revision to the Tennessee 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

concerning the maintenance plan 

addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone 

standards for the Nashville, Tennessee 

1997 8-hour ozone maintenance area, 

which is comprised of Davidson, 

Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, and 

Wilson Counties in their entireties 

(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Nashville 

Area’’). This maintenance plan was 

submitted by the State of Tennessee 

Department of Environment and 

Conservation (TDEC) on August 3, 2010, 

for parallel processing. TDEC submitted 

the final version of the SIP on October 

13, 2010. The maintenance plan ensures 

the continued attainment of the 1997 

8-hour ozone national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS) through the 

year 2018. This plan meets the statutory 

and regulatory requirements, and is 

consistent with EPA’s guidance. EPA is 

taking final action to approve the 

revision to the Tennessee SIP, pursuant 

to the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also 

in the process of establishing a new 

8-hour ozone NAAQS, and expects to 

finalize the reconsidered NAAQS by 

July 2011. Today’s action, however, 

relates only to the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. Requirements for the Nashville 

Area under the 2011 NAAQS will be 

addressed in the future. 

DATES: This rule will be effective 

February 28, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2010–0663. All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed on the 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that, if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Royce Dansby-Sparks, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Royce 

Dansby-Sparks may be reached by 

phone at (404) 562–9187 or by 

electronic mail address dansbysparks.royce@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements 

III. Today’s Action 

IV. Final Action 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 5079 

I. Background 

In accordance with the CAA, the 

Nashville Area was designated 

nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone 

NAAQS on November 6, 1991, 56 FR 

56694 (effective January 6, 1992, 60 FR 

7124). On November 14, 1994, the State 

of Tennessee, through the TDEC, 

submitted a request to redesignate the 

Nashville Area to attainment for the 

1-hour ozone NAAQS. Subsequently on 

August 9, 1995, and January 19, 1996, 

Tennessee submitted supplementary 

information which included revised 

contingency measures and emission 

projections. Included with the 1-hour 

ozone redesignation request, Tennessee 

submitted the required 1-hour ozone 

monitoring data and maintenance plan 

ensuring the Area would remain in 

attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS 

for at least a period of 10 years 

(consistent with CAA 175A(a)). The 

maintenance plan submitted by 

Tennessee followed EPA guidance for 

maintenance areas, subject to section 

175A of the CAA. 

On October 30, 1996, EPA approved 

Tennessee’s request to redesignate the 

Nashville Area to attainment for the 1- 

hour ozone NAAQS (61 FR 55903). The 

maintenance plan for the Area became 

effective on October 30, 1996. 

Tennessee later updated the 

maintenance plan in accordance with 

section 175(A)(b) on August 10, 2005, to 

extend the maintenance plan to cover 

additional years such that the entire 

maintenance period was for at least 20 

years after the initial redesignation of 

the Area to attainment. EPA approved 

Tennessee’s maintenance plan update 

for the Nashville Area on November 1, 

2005 (70 FR 65838). 

II. EPA Guidance and CAA 

Requirements 

On April 30, 2004, EPA designated 

and classified areas for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and 

published the final Phase 1 Rule for 

implementation of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase 1 

Rule), ultimately revoking the 1-hour 

ozone NAAQS. The Nashville Area, 

however, was still required to fulfill 

requirements under the 1-hour ozone 

NAAQS due to its participation in an 

Early Action Compact (EAC). For areas 

participating in an EAC, the effective 

designation date for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS was deferred until 

December 31, 2006, in a final action 

published by EPA on August 19, 2005 

(70 FR 50988) and later extended to 

April 15, 2008 (71 FR 69022) for most 

of the EAC Areas, including Nashville, 

so long as the Area continued to meet 

milestone requirements. Therefore, the 

requirement for an attainment area to 

submit a 10-year maintenance plan 

under 110(a)(1) of the CAA and the 

Phase 1 Rule was also postponed until 

the Area was effectively designated for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The 

Nashville Area was later designated as 

attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS, effective April 15, 2008, with 

the 1-hour ozone requirements no 

longer effective on April 15, 2009 (73 FR 

17897). Tennessee was consequently 

required to submit a 10-year 

maintenance plan under section 

110(a)(1) of the CAA and the Phase 1 

Rule for the Nashville Area. 

On May 20, 2005, EPA issued 

guidance providing information as to 

how a state might fulfill the 

maintenance plan obligation established 

by the CAA and the Phase I Rule 

(Memorandum from Lydia N. Wegman 

to Air Division Directors, Maintenance 

Plan Guidance Document for Certain 8- 

hour Ozone Areas Under Section 

110(a)(1) of Clean Air Act, May 20, 

2005—hereafter referred to as ‘‘Wegman 

Memorandum’’). On December 22, 2006, 

the United States Court of Appeals for 

the District of Columbia Circuit issued 

an opinion that vacated portions of 

EPA’s Phase I Rule. See South Coast Air 

Quality Management District. v. EPA, 

472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006). The Court 

vacated those portions of the Phase I 

Rule that provided for regulation of the 

1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas 

designated under Subpart 1 (of part D of 

the CAA), in lieu of Subpart 2 among 

other portions. The Court’s decision did 

not alter any 8-hour ozone attainment 

area requirements under the Phase I 

Rule for CAA section 110(a)(1) 

maintenance plans. 

On August 3, 2010, TDEC submitted 

a draft revision to EPA for approval into 

the Tennessee SIP to ensure the 

continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS through the year 2018. 

Subsequently, on October 8, 2010, EPA 

published a proposed rulemaking to 

approve Tennessee’s August 3, 2010, 

SIP revision under parallel processing. 

75 FR 62354. Detailed background 

information and EPA’s rationale for the 

proposed approval are provided in 

EPA’s October 8, 2010, Federal Register 

notice. EPA’s October 8, 2010, proposed 

approval was contingent upon 

Tennessee providing a final SIP revision 

that was substantively the same as the 

revision proposed for approval by EPA 

in the October 8, 2010, proposed 

rulemaking. Tennessee provided its 

final SIP revision on October 13, 2010. 

There were no changes between 

Tennessee’s August 3, 2010, draft SIP 

revision and the final SIP revision 

which was provided on October 13, 

2010. EPA has determined that 

Tennessee’s October 13, 2010, submittal 

satisfies the section 110(a)(1) CAA 

requirements for a plan that provides for 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS in the Nashville maintenance 

area. 

III. Today’s Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the SIP revision concerning the 

110(a)(1) maintenance plan addressing 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 

Nashville Area. This maintenance plan 

was submitted to EPA on October 13, 

2010, by the State of Tennessee, to 

ensure the continued attainment of the 

1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the 

year 2018. This approval action is based 

on EPA’s analyses of whether this 

request complies with section 110 of the 

CAA and 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4). EPA’s 

analyses of Tennessee’s submittal are 

described in detail in the proposed rule 

published October 8, 2010 (75 FR 

62354). 

The comment period for this 

proposed action closed on November 8, 

2010. EPA did not receive any adverse 

comments on this action during the 

public comment period. However, EPA 

is making note of two typographical 

errors in the October 8, 2010, proposed 

rulemaking notice (75 FR 62354). When 

referring to the date that the State of 

Tennessee requested the Nashville Area 

be redesignated to attainment for the 1- 

hour ozone NAAQS, the date was 

inadvertently listed as 2004 instead of 

1994. Additionally, the discussion of 

Table 3 on page 62357 of the October 8, 

2010, proposed rulemaking notice 

incorrectly stated that the maximum 

2007–2009 8-hour ozone design value 

was 0.079 parts per million (ppm) when 

the correct value, as listed correctly in 

Table 3, is 0.078 ppm. 

IV. Final Action 

Pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, 

EPA is approving the maintenance plan 

addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS for the Nashville Area, which 

was submitted by Tennessee on October 

13, 2010, and ensures continued 

attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS through the year 2018. EPA has 

evaluated the State’s submittal and has 

determined that it meets the applicable 

requirements of the CAA and EPA 

regulations, and is consistent with EPA 

policy. On March 12, 2008, EPA issued 

a revised ozone NAAQS. EPA 

subsequently announced a 

reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, 

and proposed new 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS in January 2010. The current 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES

5080 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

action, however, is being taken to 

address requirements under the 1997 

ozone NAAQS. Requirements for the 

Nashville Area under the 2011 NAAQS 

will be addressed in the future. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by March 29, 2011. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: January 13, 2011. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart RR—Tennessee 

■ 2. Section 52.2220(e), is amended by 

adding a new entry for ‘‘Nashville 

8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan 

Section 110(a)(1)’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.2220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA–Approved Tennessee NonRegulatory Provisions 

Name of non-regulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area State effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Nashville 8-Hour Ozone 

110(a)(1) Maintenance 

Plan.

Nashville 8-Hour Ozone 

Attainment Area.

October 13, 2010 .............. 1/28/11 [insert citation of 

publication].

Maintenance plan for the 

1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. 

[FR Doc. 2011–1782 Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 19 / Friday, January 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 5081 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8165] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities, where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP), that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 

adopted the required floodplain 

management measures prior to the 

effective suspension date given in this 

rule, the suspension will not occur and 

a notice of this will be provided by 

publication in the Federal Register on a 

subsequent date. 

DATES: Effective Dates: The effective 

date of each community’s scheduled 

suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) 

listed in the third column of the 

following tables. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you want to determine whether a 

particular community was suspended 

on the suspension date or for further 

information, contact David Stearrett, 

Mitigation Directorate, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, 

(202) 646–2953. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP 

enables property owners to purchase 

flood insurance which is generally not 

otherwise available. In return, 

communities agree to adopt and 

administer local floodplain management 

aimed at protecting lives and new 

construction from future flooding. 

Section 1315 of the National Flood 

Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 

U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance 

coverage as authorized under the NFIP, 

42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., , unless an 

appropriate public body adopts 

adequate floodplain management 

measures with effective enforcement 

measures. The communities listed in 

this document no longer meet that 

statutory requirement for compliance 

with program regulations, 44 CFR part 

59. Accordingly, the communities will 

be suspended on the effective date in 

the third column. As of that date, flood 

insurance will no longer be available in 

the community. However, some of these 

communities may adopt and submit the 

required documentation of legally 

enforceable floodplain management 

measures after this rule is published but 

prior to the actual suspension date. 

These communities will not be 

suspended and will continue their 

eligibility for the sale of insurance. A 

notice withdrawing the suspension of 

the communities will be published in 

the Federal Register. 

In addition, FEMA has identified the 

Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in 

these communities by publishing a 

Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The 

date of the FIRM, if one has been 

published, is indicated in the fourth 

column of the table. No direct Federal 

financial assistance (except assistance 

pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford 

Disaster Relief and Emergency 

Assistance Act not in connection with a 

flood) may legally be provided for 

construction or acquisition of buildings 

in identified SFHAs for communities 

not participating in the NFIP and 

identified for more than a year, on 

FEMA’s initial flood insurance map of 

the community as having flood-prone 

areas (section 202(a) of the Flood 

Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 

U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This 

prohibition against certain types of 

Federal assistance becomes effective for 

the communities listed on the date 

shown in the last column. The 

Administrator finds that notice and 

public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) 

are impracticable and unnecessary 

because communities listed in this final 

rule have been adequately notified. 

Each community receives 6-month, 

90-day, and 30-day notification letters 

addressed to the Chief Executive Officer 

stating that the community will be 

suspended unless the required 

floodplain management measures are 

met prior to the effective suspension 

date. Since these notifications were 

made, this final rule may take effect 

within less than 30 days. 

National Environmental Policy Act. 

This rule is categorically excluded from 

the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, 

Environmental Considerations. No 

environmental impact assessment has 

been prepared. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. The 

Administrator has determined that this 

rule is exempt from the requirements of 

the Regulatory Flexibility Act because 

the National Flood Insurance Act of 

1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, 

prohibits flood insurance coverage 

unless an appropriate public body 

adopts adequate floodplain management 

measures with effective enforcement 

measures. The communities listed no 

longer comply with the statutory 

requirements, and after the effective 

date, flood insurance will no longer be 

available in the communities unless 

remedial action takes place. 

Regulatory Classification. This final 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

under the criteria of section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 

1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 

58 FR 51735. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism. 

This rule involves no policies that have 

federalism implications under Executive 

Order 13132. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform. This rule meets the applicable 

standards of Executive Order 12988. 

Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule 

does not involve any collection of 

information for purposes of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq. 

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64 

Flood insurance, Floodplains. 

Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is 

amended as follows: 

PART 64—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 64 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; 

Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 

3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376. 

§ 64.6 [Amended] 

■ 2. The tables published under the 

authority of § 64.6 are amended as 

follows: 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES