alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 12, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer), P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

                    1.                     *First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc.,*                     Evansville, Indiana; to become a bank holding company through the conversion of First Federal Savings Bank, Evansville, Indiana, from a federally chartered savings bank to a state chartered commercial bank.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 12, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-20942 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. (“NCOIC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, EAE Systems North America, Inc., Rockville, MD; Rockwell Collins, Cedar Rapids, IA; ITT Corporation, White Plains, NY; Innovative Concepts, Inc., McLean, VA; Maritime Technology Centre R&D Institute, Gdynia, POLAND; Solera Networks, Lindon, UT; and Dataline, LLC, McLean, VA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NCOIC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 19, 2004, NCOIC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 23, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65511).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-2059 Filed 1-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>




                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1




The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Morton Industrial Group, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-68927 and 333-69575) on Form S-8 of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 10, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Morton Industrial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on
Form 10-K of Morton Industrial Group, Inc.





KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 29, 2000
#### SKEHAN v LARKIN

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

No 2363.

Decided May 19, 1930

M. B. McCarthy, Toledo, and George N. Fell, Toledo, for Skehan.

Powell & Starritt, Toledo, for Larkin.

*426WILLIAMS, J.

In this proceeding in error many grounds of reversal are urged among them the claim is made that the property received was not assets of the estate and, if so, that no assets of the estate of decedent were concealed or embezzled or conveyed away by plaintiff in error. That contention is well-founded. The personal property claimed to have passed by way of gifts was not, under the circumstances in the case, assets of the decedent’s estate. There only passed to the personal representative of the decedent a right of action to set aside the alleged transfers or gifts and recover the property or the value thereof and in such an action the real party in interest would be the personal representative of the decedent.

In the case of Losee vs. Krieger, 22 Ohio App., 395, this court held that the petition stated a good cause of action not only under 10673 GC, but also under the Code of Civil Procedure. It will be observed, however, that in that case the action was brought by the administrator of the decedent’s estate, in his representative capacity. In the instant case the action is brought by John Larkin, a brother and legatee, individually, and he could not maintain the cause of action under the Code for the reason that he is not the real party in interest.

This court does not pass upon the question whether or not the summary remedy under 10673 GC may be maintained by one, who has an interest in the estate of a deceased insane person, against another who wrongfully conceals or conveys away decedent’s personal property immediately before her death and in anticipation thereof and retains it under claim of right. This court is of the opinion that that question is not presented by the record in the instant case.

As the plaintiff below could not maintain the summary remedy under 10673 GC., and was not the real party in interest in an action under the Code of Civil Procedure, the judgment must be reversed and final judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in error.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ., concur.
#### § 901.5 Agreement to refrain from strike or lockout.

As part of its conditions for entering the dispute, the Commission may request the parties to continue the terms or conditions of employment without the occurrence of a strike or lockout for a 30-day period, as set forth in section 5(a) of the Executive Order, to enhance the functions of mediation and other related activities.
# 6ft.**'P/J~P}J~ &~** **f{J})~o/Pl>uMo ow~** 

DavidE. Peralta ParishPresident 1125E. St. BernardHighway Phone (504) 278-4300

February 11, 2013

U.S. Dept. of Transportation Docket Mamagement Systems 400 7th St. SW, Room PL-4090 Washington, DC 20591-0001

Dear Sir: Chalmette,Louisiana70043 Fax(504) 278-4480

(.,'l

L·J ......J ..._ -·-· '

### ~~;.r·-{ '-,_."'**~** n 1:..,-"

.. 1

-··
___ .... '1;._ _.;**>~=-·.:~**

### ~~:::?8

This letter is a follow up to my letter of January 30, 2013 requesting to extend the Exemption No. 10161 Regulatory No. FAA-2005-0001, dated May 16, 2011, which will expire May 31, 2013 for St. Bernard Mosquito Control, St. Bernard Parish Government, 8201 West Judge Preez Drive, Chalmettwe, LA. 70043. Proposed Action: Load aircraft to max. of single operational gross weight in place of the rule to load aircraft to MAX. gross take off weight and have a jettisoning device to jettison chemical load. This exemption from Section 14 CFR 137.53(c)(2) will increase the level of public safety beyond the level of safety required by the rule CFR 137.53(c)(2). The aircraft is the same BN2A-26 s/n 883 N706MS as the origional exemption. This exemption will insure the exit from the congested area to a safe landing, with out the release of chemical into the congested area. This will protect persons, property and the enviroment from large volumes of unsprayed chemical and increase the safety of the flight crew. This exemption is to be used for the use of the above list aircraft ONLY. Placards are installed on the chemical tank with the MAX Single engine gross load in U.S. pounds. The tank liquid capicity is designed to**co~tain** only the gallons of the chemical to the pounds listed on the placard to prevent over load.

# ~~~~·#4--· Augd{t J. Blake Agent of Service St. Bernard Mosquito Control

# rf/t.**PIJ~ PJJ~** **8!~ ~~o{PJ>edk** **Off/~**

DavidE. Peralta ParishPresident

. 1125E. St. BernardHighway Phone(504) 278-4300

January 30, 2013



## u.s. Dept. of Transportation Docket Management System 400 7th St. SW, Room PL-4090 Washington, DC 20591-0001

Dear Sir: Chalmette,Louisiana70043 Fax (504) 278-4480

This letter is to request to extend Exemption No. 10161 Regulatory No. FAA-2005-20297, dated May 16, 2011, which will expire May 31, 2013, for St. Bernard Mosquito Control, St. Bernard Parish Government, 8201 West Judge Perez Drive,

# c~~:f7~**A~;~~** ;_·

# Bla~e · Agent of Service St. Bernard Parish Mosquito Control
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission with respect to broadcast media ownership.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to broadcast 

5 media ownership (Report and Order FCC 07–216), re6 ceived by Congress on February 22, 2008, and such rule 

7 shall have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate May 15, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 28

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal 

broadcast media ownership.Communications Commission with respect to
SERVED : FEBRUAR Y 7 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N 

### ?::^^ARTMENTO F • /i'lSPORTATIO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S • ' - ' " ''''^''"

- WASHINGTON , D C ^ . 

### '::; i 

### ^ii i - 8 AM : 2 9 I N TH EMATTE RO F NEB O AVIATIO N SERVICES , LL C FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA001 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-20I0-107 8 ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG E DISMISSIN GPROCEEDIN GWIT H PREJUDIC E B y Respondent' s Notic e o f Withdrawa l o f

Hearin g Request , serve dFebruary 4 , 2011 , Responden t

state s tha t

th e above-captione dproceedin g ha s bee n settle dan dthat Responden t withdraw s it s reques t

for hearing . Accordingly , pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.215 , thi s proceedin g i s dismisse dwithprejudice . Th e FA A shal l sen dth e Judg e an dth e Docke t acop y o f

an y compromis e orde r

o r final orde r

assessin g civi l penalty . S O ORDERED .

Ronni e A . Yo t Chie f AdministratiiJ^tiS w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10EA001 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA Li

& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregory S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Aviatio n Law Fir

m On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Stephe n W . Brice , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , Eastern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-326 8 FAX : 716-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX ; 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , us e th

e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC^30 . -2 -
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)

File Name: 21a0258p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

RESURRECTION SCHOOL; CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, 

individually and as next friend on behalf of his minor 

children C.M., Z.M., and N.M.; STEPHANIE SMITH, 

individually and as next friend on behalf of her minor 

child F.S.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ELIZABETH HERTEL, in her official capacity as the 

Director of the Michigan Department of Health and 

Human Services; DANA NESSEL, in her official 

capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan; 

LINDA VAIL, in her official capacity as the Health 

Officer of Ingham County; CAROL A. SIEMON, in her 

official capacity as the Ingham County Prosecuting 

Attorney,

Defendants-Appellees.

┐

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

┘

No. 20-2256

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids;

No. 1:20-cv-01016—Paul Lewis Maloney, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: November 10, 2021

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, 

GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, 

BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_________________

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Erin Elizabeth Mersino, GREAT LAKES 

JUSTICE CENTER, Lansing, Michigan, Robert J. Muise, AMERICAN FREEDOM LAW 

CENTER, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellants. ON RESPONSE: Daniel J. Ping, Joseph T. 

Froehlich, Ann M. Sherman, Jennifer Rosa, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for State of Michigan Appellees. Bonnie G. Toskey, Sarah K. 

>
No. 20-2256 Resurrection Sch. et al. v. Hertel et al. Page 2

Osburn, COHL, STOKER & TOSKEY, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, for Appellees Linda Vail and 

Carol Siemon. ON BRIEF: Brett R. Nolan, OFFICE OF THE KENTUCKY ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, Frankfort, Kentucky, Daniel H. Blomberg, THE BECKET FUND FOR 

RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

_________________

ORDER

_________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en 

banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: 

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous 

opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on 

the docket sheet as a pending appeal. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are 

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for 

oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________________________________

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18,UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers of Dragon  Pharmaceutical Inc., a Florida corporation (the
"Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their
knowledge:

     (1) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the  information  contained  in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: November 14, 2003                   /s/ Alexander Wick
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alexander Wick
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 14, 2003                   /s/ Matthew Kavanagh
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Matthew Kavanagh
                                           Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-1110; MM Docket No. 00-28; RM-9796]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Christine, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a proposal filed by Christine Radio 
Broadcasting Company requesting the allotment of Channel 245A at 
Christine, Texas, as the community's first local service. See 65 FR 
11537, March 3, 2000. As stated in the Notice, a showing of continuing 
interest is required before a channel will be allotted. Since there has 
been no interest expressed for the allotment of a channel at Christine, 
the Report and Order dismisses the proposal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 00-28, adopted May 10, 2000, and released May 
19, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's 
Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete 
text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-
3805.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-13597 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P