alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 322 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 322

 Honoring the lifetime achievements of General George Sears Greene on 
 the occasion of the 100th anniversary rededication of the monument in 
                               his honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 2007

 Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mrs. Clinton, and Mr. Schumer) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the lifetime achievements of General George Sears Greene on 
 the occasion of the 100th anniversary rededication of the monument in 
                               his honor.

Whereas George Sears Greene was one of 9 children born to Caleb and Sarah 
        Robinson Wicks Greene in Apponaug, Rhode Island, attended grammar school 
        in Warwick, Rhode Island, and moved to New York as a teenager;
Whereas Greene attended the United States Military Academy at West Point, where 
        he graduated 2nd in his class in 1823;
Whereas Greene entered the Army as a 2nd lieutenant in the 3rd United States 
        Artillery regiment, and, due to his superb scholarship, was appointed to 
        teach mathematics at the Military Academy following his graduation;
Whereas, after resigning his commission in the Army in 1836, Greene worked as a 
        civil engineer, became a founder of the American Society of Civil 
        Engineers and Architects, and constructed railroads and canals in 
        several states and designed aqueducts and municipal sewage and water 
        systems for New York, Providence, and several other cities;
Whereas, at the outset of the Civil War, Greene returned to the defense of the 
        Nation and, at the age of 60, was appointed colonel of the 60th New York 
        Infantry regiment;
Whereas, on April 28, 1862, Greene was promoted to Brigadier General, United 
        States Volunteers;
Whereas, on July 2, 1863, on the 2nd day of the Battle of Gettysburg, Greene led 
        the 3rd Brigade of New Yorkers on Culp's Hill, and his regiment's 
        defense of the Union right flank at Culp's during the battle was a 
        contributing factor in the Union's victory;
Whereas Greene passed away at the age of 97 in 1899 and, in 1907, a monument on 
        Culp's Hill was erected in Greene's honor; and
Whereas the General George Sears Greene monument will be rededicated on 
        September 22, 2007: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, in honor of the 100th anniversary 
rededication of the General George Sears Greene monument at Gettysburg, 
Pennsylvania, commends the lifetime achievements of General Greene, his 
commitment to public service, and his decisive and heroic defense of 
Culp's Hill in the crucial Battle of Gettysburg.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher L.
Boone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christopher L.
Boone


Christopher
L. Boone


Chief
Financial Officer


March 1,
2010





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
other purpose.
(81 South. 145)

#### Petition of CURTIS, County Judge.

(6 Div. 416.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 14, 1919.)

Certiorari &wkey;»49 — Writ — Return — Necessity.

Petition to the Court of Appeals for certiorari will be dismissed, there having been no return to the writ issued thereon, or to the alias writ, in the absence of which the court is without jurisdiction to review, and it being incumbent on prosecutor to see that the return is made and to invoke the aid of the court to compel compliance with the mandate of the writ.

Petition for common-law certiorari by John S. Curtis, as Judge of' the County Court of Winston County.

Dismissed.

W. Y. Mayhall, of Haleyville, for petitioner.

J. A. Stagners, of Haleyville, opposed.

SAMFORD, J.

The petition in this cause was submitted November 29, 1917. On January 30, 1918, writ was awarded and notice ordered to issue to Charles Shafer or to J. A. Stagner, his attorney of record, to appear and defend. No return was made to this writ, and on April 18, 1918, an alias writ was issued. No return is made to the alias.

> “Although it is the duty of the officers to whom the writ is directed to prepare their return, and although they may be compelled summarily to make a return, yet it is incumbent upon the prosecutor of the writ, rather than the adverse party to him, to see that the return is made and to invoke the aid of the court to compel the compliance with the mandate of the writ.” St. John v. Richter et al., 167 Ala. 660, 52 South. 465, 466, and authorities there cited.

In the absence of the return, this court is without jurisdiction to review. The petition is dismissed. St. John v. Richter et al., supra.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
FIND IT. REPORT IT. SAVE TREES.

1-866-702-9938 com . eetle b orned gh on L asian

White

spots

Shiny

black

body

Six legs

May have 

blue feet

Long black antennae 

with white bands

Actual size

REPORT IT at

1-866-702-9938

asianLonghornedbeetle.com

HOW TO CHECK 

YOUR TREES:

Take 10 minutes. •

Look for signs of •

the beetle.

Report any sightings. •

August is “tree •

check” month.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an 

equal opportunity provider and employer. Issued October 2013

Program Aid No. 2145

Check your trees for the 

Asian

Longhorned

beetle (also known as ALB)

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Larva in 

chopped wood

look for the signs

You can see the adult ALB from 

June through October, but 

you can spot the signs year-round.

Round exit hole

Egg sites 

on bark

Frass 

(sawdust-like material)

Pupa in 

chopped wood

Adult beetle

Trees attacked:

• Ash

• Birch

• Elm

• Golden

raintree

• Hackberry

• Horsechestnut

• Katsura 

• London

planetree

• Maple

• Mimosa

• Mountain ash

• Poplar

• Willow

Exit hole
§ 4043.28 Plan merger, consolidation or transfer. ( a ) *Reportable event.* A reportable event occurs when a plan merges, consolidates, or transfers its assets or liabilities under section 208 of ERISA or section 414(*l*) of the Code.
( b ) *Waiver.* Notice under this section is waived for this event. However, notice may be required under § 4043.29 (for a controlled group change) or § 4043.32 (for a transfer of benefit liabilities).
§ 95.32 Real property. DOL shall prescribe requirements for recipients concerning the use and disposition of real property acquired in whole or in part under awards. Unless otherwise provided by statute, such requirements, at a minimum, shall contain the following: ( a ) Title to real property shall vest in the recipient subject to the condition that the recipient shall use the real property for the authorized purpose of the project as long as it is needed and shall not encumber the property without approval of DOL.
( b ) The recipient shall obtain prior written approval from the grant officer for the use of real property in other federally-sponsored projects when the recipient determines that the property is no longer needed for the purpose of the original project. Use in other projects shall be limited to those under federally-sponsored projects (i.e., awards) or programs that have purposes consistent with those authorized for support by DOL.
( c ) When the real property is no longer needed as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the recipient shall request disposition instructions from the grant officer. The grant officer shall issue one or more of the following disposition instructions: ( 1 ) The recipient may be permitted to retain title without further obligation to the Federal Government after it compensates the Federal Government for that percentage of the current fair market value of the property attributable to the Federal participation in the project.
( 2 ) The recipient may be directed to sell the property under guidelines provided by DOL and pay DOL for that percentage of the current fair market value of the property attributable to the Federal participation in the project (after deducting actual and reasonable selling and fix-up expenses, if any, from the sales proceeds). When the recipient is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures shall be established that provide for competition to the extent practicable and result in the highest possible return.
( 3 ) The recipient may be directed to transfer title to the property to the Federal Government or to an eligible third party provided that, in such cases, the recipient shall be entitled to compensation for its attributable percentage of the current fair market value of the property.
§ 553.223 Meal time. ( a ) If a public agency elects to pay overtime compensation to employees in fire protection activities and law enforcement personnel in accordance with section 7(a)(1) of the Act, the public agency may exclude meal time from hours worked if all the tests in § 785.19 of this title are met.
( b ) If a public agency elects to use the section 7(k) exemption, the public agency may, in the case of law enforcement personnel, exclude meal time from hours worked on tours of duty of 24 hours or less, provided that the employee is completely relieved from duty during the meal period, and all the other tests in § 785.19 of this title are met. On the other hand, where law enforcement personnel are required to remain on call in barracks or similar quarters, or are engaged in extended surveillance activities (e.g., “stakeouts”), they are not considered to be completely relieved from duty, and any such meal periods would be compensable.
( c ) With respect to employees in fire protection activities employed under section 7(k), who are confined to a duty station, the legislative history of the Act indicates Congressional intent to mandate a departure from the usual FLSA “hours of work” rules and adoption of an overtime standard keyed to the unique concept of “tour of duty” under which employees in fire protection activities are employed. Where the public agency elects to use the section 7(k) exemption for employees in fire protection activities, meal time cannot be excluded from the compensable hours of work where ( 1 ) the employee in fire protection activities is on a tour of duty of less than 24 hours, and
( 2 ) where the employee in fire protection activities is on a tour of duty of exactly 24 hours, which is a departure from the general rules in § 785.22 of this title.
( d ) In the case of police officers or employees in fire protection activities who are on a tour of duty of more than 24 hours, meal time may be excluded from compensable hours of work provided that the tests in §§ 785.19 and 785.22 of this title are met.
[52 FR 2032, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 76 FR 18857, Apr. 5, 2011]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10817 

Summary Calendar

 

ELBERT SILAS GREEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER, Contractor for 

Med-Dental Care for Middleton Unit; JOHN 

MIDDLETON UNIT, Health Administrator; No

First Name COLLIER, DDS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CV-042-BA

- - - - - - - - - -

February 27, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elbert Silas Green, a Texas prisoner (# 764049), appeals

from the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his civil rights

complaint without prejudice based on his failure to comply with a

March 6, 1997, district court order directing him to file a copy

of his inmate trust account statement in accordance with 28

U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform
No. 97-10817

- 2 -

Act (“PLRA”). The magistrate judge did not abuse its discretion

in dismissing Green’s complaint, as the burden of ensuring that

the account statement was produced fell on Green. See Long v.

Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 879 (5th Cir. 1996); Morrow v. Collins, 111

F.3d 374, 375 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 784.116 Exempt and nonexempt work in the same workweek.

Where an employee, during any workweek, performs work that is exempt under section 13(a)(5) or 13(b)(4), and also performs nonexempt work, some part of which is covered by the Act, the exemption will be deemed inapplicable unless the time spent in performing nonexempt work during that week is not substantial in amount. For enforcement purposes, nonexempt work will be considered substantial in amount if more than 20 percent of the time worked by the employee in a given workweek is devoted to such work (see *Mitchell* v. *Stinson,* 217 F. 2d 210). Where exempt and nonexempt work is performed during a workweek by an employee and is not or cannot be segregated so as to permit separate measurement of the time spent in each, the employee will not be exempt (see *Tobin* v. *Blue Channel Corp.,* 198 F. 2d 245; *Walling* v. *Public Quick Freezing and Cold Storage Co.,* 62 F. Supp. 924).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEETS OF LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC., FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,600
<INVENTORY>                                     13,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,200
<PP&E>                                         509,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,700
<BONDS>                                        281,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   491,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code
as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, John Aglialoro, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN AGLIALORO               
|                      |  |  |  | John Aglialoro                      
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP96-312-028]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

May 19, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 15, 2000, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), tendered for filing certain Negotiated Rate Arrangement. 
Tennessee requests that the Commission approve the Negotiated Rate 
Arrangement effective November 1, 2000.
    Tennessee states that the filed Negotiated Rate Arrangement 
reflects negotiated rates between Tennessee and Nicor Gas (``Nicor'') 
for transportation under Rate Schedule FT-A beginning November 1, 2000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13111 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of High Speed Access Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
E. Willett, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 1, 2003                     By /s/ George E. Willett
                                          ---------------------
                                          George E. Willett
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 552.106 Companionship services.

The term “companionship services” is defined in § 552.6. Persons who provide care and protection for babies and young children who do not have illnesses, injuries, or disabilities are considered babysitters, not companions. The companion must perform the services with respect to the elderly person or person with an illness, injury, or disability and not generally to other persons. The “casual” limitation does not apply to companion services.

[78 FR 60557, Oct. 1, 2013]