alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Bureau of Land Management

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Notice of Public Meeting, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 
National Monument Advisory Committee; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior; and Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 
National Monument Act of 2000 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest 
Service) Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument 
Advisory Committee (MAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: March 7, 2011. The meeting will start at 3 p.m. and end at 6 
p.m. with the public comment period beginning at 4 p.m. The meeting 
will be held at the County of Riverside Permit Assistance Center, 
Second Floor Conference Room, 38686 El Cerrito Road, Palm Desert, 
California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Foote, Monument Manager, Santa 
Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, 1201 Bird Center 
Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262, or telephone (760) 833-7136.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MAC advises the Secretary of the 
Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, through the BLM and Forest 
Service, with respect to the preparation and implementation of a 
management plan for the National Monument. The meeting will focus on a 
variety of planning and management issues associated with the National 
Monument. All MAC meetings are open to the public. The public may 
present written comments to the MAC in advance of or at the meeting. 
Each formal MAC meeting will also have time allocated for receiving 
public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment 
and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact the Monument Manager as provided above.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
John R. Kalish,
Field Manager, Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office, California Desert 
District, Bureau of Land Management.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Laurie Rosenthal,
District Ranger, San Jacinto Ranger District, San Bernardino National 
Forest, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-2002 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
§ 99.230 Audit costs. ( a ) *Allowable costs.* Unless prohibited by law, the cost of audits made in accordance with the provisions of this part are allowable charges to Federal awards. The charges may be considered a direct cost or an allocated indirect cost, as determined in accordance with the provisions of applicable OMB cost principles circulars, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)(48 CFR parts 30 and 31), or other applicable cost principles or regulations.
( b ) *Unallowable costs.* A non-Federal entity shall not charge the following to a Federal award: ( 1 ) The cost of any audit under the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501 *et seq.*) not conducted in accordance with this part.
( 2 ) The cost of auditing a non-Federal entity which has Federal awards expended of less than $300,000 per year (or $500,000 for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2003) and is thereby exempted under § 99.200(d) from having an audit conducted under this part. However, this does not prohibit a pass-through entity from charging Federal awards for the cost of limited scope audits to monitor its subrecipients in accordance with § 99.400(d)(3), provided the subrecipient does not have a single audit. For purposes of this part, limited scope audits only include agreed-upon procedures engagements conducted in accordance with either the AICPA's generally accepted auditing standards or attestation standards, that are paid for and arranged by a pass-through entity and address only one or more of the following types of compliance requirements: activities allowed or unallowed; allowable costs/cost principles; eligibility; matching; level of effort; earmarking; and, reporting.
[64 FR 14541, Mar. 25, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 37105, July 9, 2007]
##### 



FIFTH AMENDMENT
OF
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
401(k) EXCESS PLAN
(2002 Restatement)
     1. AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL ELIGIBILITY RULE FOR TRANSITION BENEFIT. Section 2.3 of the Plan Statement
shall be amended in its entirety to read in full as follows:
 Special Eligibility Rule for Transition Benefit
 2. AMENDMENT TO TRANSITION BENEFIT TERMS. Section 3.4 [Transition Benefit] of the Plan Statement
shall be amended in its entirety to read in full as follows:
 Transition Benefit
 Amount




---



##### 



(a)
    
    an amount equal to the employees Excess Compensation for such Plan Year
multiplied by the transition benefit percentage determined for such employee under
the Retirement Savings Plan for such Plan Year, and(b)
    
    the amount of any transition benefit (other than the amount identified in
paragraph (a) above) to be allocated to such employee which is in excess of the
maximum permissible addition which would have been contributed on behalf of the
Participant under the Retirement Savings Plan but for the limitation on annual
additions imposed under section 415 of the Code.
 Crediting the Account
 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall
continue in full force and effect.
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW
ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below  constitutes and
appoints each of Robert E. Switz and Gokul V. Hemmady, with full  power to each to act
without the other, his or her true and lawful  attorney-in-fact and agent with full power
of substitution, for him or her and  in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the  Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the
Company) for the Companys fiscal year ended October 31, 2004,  and any
or all amendments to said Annual Report, and to file the same, with all  exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission, and to file the same with such other  authorities as necessary, granting unto
each such attorney-in-fact and agent  full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing  requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all  intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying  and confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his
substitute,  may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons  on the
dates indicated below their names.

|                          |  |                       | 
|------------------------- |  | --------------------- | 
|
|/s/ John A. Blanchard III |  | /s/ Lois M. Martin    | 
|John A. Blanchard III     |  | Lois M. Martin        | 
|Date:    1/14/05          |  | Date:    1/14/05      | 
|                          |  |                       | 
|/s/ John J. Boyle III     |  | /s/William Spivey     | 
|John J. Boyle III         |  | William Spivey        | 
|Date:    1/14/05          |  | Date:    1/14/05      | 
|                          |  |                       | 
|/s/James C. Castle        |  | /s/ Jean-Pierre Rosso | 
|James C. Castle           |  | Jean-Pierre Rosso     | 
|Date:    1/14/05          |  | Date:    1/14/05      | 
|                          |  |                       | 
|/s/ Mickey P. Foret       |  | /s/ John Rehfeld      | 
|Mickey P. Foret           |  | John Rehfeld          | 
|Date:    1/14/05          |  | Date:    1/14/05      | 
|                          |  |                       | 
|/s/ J. Kevin Gilligan     |  | /s/ Larry W. Wangberg | 
|J. Kevin Gilligan         |  | Larry W. Wangberg     | 
|Date:    1/14/05          |  | Date:    1/14/05      | 
|                          |  |                       | 
|/s/ B. Kristine Johnson   |  | /s/ John D. Wunsch    | 
|B. Kristine Johnson       |  | John D. Wunsch        | 
|Date:    1/14/05          |  | Date:    1/14/05      |
Exhibit 31.2



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, Thomas G. Milne, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report of China Energy Ventures Corp.



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.





|Date:  November 12, 2004 | By: | /s/ Thomas MilneName:  Thomas Milne
Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139183 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139183 

 COA: 291423 

Lapeer CC: 08-009647-FC 

LLOYD DALE NAGY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 784.145 Preliminary processing by another employer as part of “canning.”

If the operations of separate processors are integrated in producing canned seafood products all employees of such processors who perform any part of the described continuous series of operations to accomplish this result would be “employed in the canning of” such products. Moreover, preliminary operations performed in a separately owned processing establishment which are directed toward the particular requirements of a cannery pursuant to some definite arrangement between the operators of the two establishments would generally appear to be integrated with the cannery operations within the meaning of the above principles, so that the employees engaged in the preliminary operations in the separate establishment would be employed in “canning” within the meaning of section 13(b)(4) of the Act. Whether or not integration exists in a specific case of this general nature will depend, of course, upon all the relevant facts and circumstances in such case.
|   | (i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period      ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 27, 2009 |   /s/      THEODORE STALICK                 |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   Theodore      Stalick, Vice President and |
|                         |   Chief      Financial Officer              |
#### §§ 70.28-70.37 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-K. Items 1 through 22 are as of Dec. 31, 1999. Items 23 through 38 are for
the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      394,825
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,591
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          71,142
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        25,952
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,510
<COMMON>                                        16,161
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      114,155
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             55,370
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 185,686
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           148,599
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  15,750
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 134,275
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  495,510
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      274,034
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            12,268
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     229,216
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     241,484
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         32,550
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,235
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  35,785
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,039
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,746
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   23,746
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        21,038
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        8,636
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          60,305
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 370 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 370

 Supporting and encouraging greater support for Veterans Day each year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2007

    Mrs. Dole (for herself and Mr. Nelson of Florida) submitted the 
  following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting and encouraging greater support for Veterans Day each year.

Whereas veterans of service in the United States Armed Forces have served the 
        Nation with honor and at great personal sacrifice;
Whereas the American people owe the security of the Nation to those who have 
        defended it;
Whereas, on Memorial Day each year, the Nation honors those who have lost their 
        lives in service to the Nation;
Whereas, on Veterans Day each year, the Nation honors those who have defended 
        democracy by serving in the Armed Forces;
Whereas the observance of Memorial Day and Veterans Day is an expression of 
        faith in democracy, faith in American values, and faith that those who 
        fight for freedom will defeat those whose cause is unjust;
Whereas section 116(a) of title 36, United States Code, provides that ``The last 
        Monday in May is Memorial Day'' and section 116(b) of that title 
        requests the President to issue a proclamation each year calling on the 
        people of the United States to observe Memorial Day by praying, 
        according to their individual religious faith, for permanent peace, 
        designating a period of time on Memorial Day during which the people may 
        unite in prayer for a permanent peace, calling on the people of the 
        United States to unite in prayer at that time, and calling on the media 
        to join in observing Memorial Day and the period of prayer;
Whereas section 4 of the National Moment of Remembrance Act (Public Law 106-579) 
        provides, ``The minute beginning at 3:00 p.m. (local time) on Memorial 
        Day each year is designated as the `National Moment of Remembrance'''; 
        and
Whereas Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, provides that ``Memorial 
        Day, the last Monday in May'' and ``Veteran's Day, November 11'' are 
        legal public holidays: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) encourages the people of the United States to 
        demonstrate their support for veterans on Veterans Day each 
        year by treating that day as a special day of reflection; and
            (2) encourages schools and teachers to educate students on 
        the great contributions veterans have made to the country and 
        its history, both while serving as members of the United States 
        Armed Forces and after completing their service.
                                 <all>
```
(1)

2

3

(1)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45
§ 4231.7 De minimis mergers and transfers. ( a ) *Special plan solvency rule.* The determination of whether a de minimis merger or transfer satisfies the plan solvency requirement in § 4231.6(a) may be made without regard to any other de minimis mergers or transfers that have occurred since the most recent actuarial valuation.
( b ) *De minimis merger defined.* A merger is de minimis if the present value of accrued benefits (whether or not vested) of one plan is less than 3 percent of the other plan's fair market value of assets.
( c ) *De minimis transfer defined.* A transfer of assets or liabilities is de minimis if— ( 1 ) The fair market value of assets transferred, if any, is less than 3 percent of the fair market value of assets of all of the transferor plan's assets;
( 2 ) The present value of the accrued benefits transferred (whether or not vested) is less than 3 percent of the fair market value of assets of all of the transferee plan's assets; and
( 3 ) The transferee plan is not a plan that has terminated under section 4041A(a)(2) of ERISA.
( d ) *Value of assets and benefits.* For purposes of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the value of plan assets and accrued benefits may be determined as of any date prior to the proposed effective date of the transaction, but not earlier than the date of the most recent actuarial valuation.
( e ) *Aggregation required.* In determining whether a merger or transfer is de minimis, the assets and accrued benefits transferred in previous de minimis mergers and transfers within the same plan year must be aggregated as described in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section. For the purposes of those paragraphs, the value of plan assets may be determined as of the date during the plan year on which the total value of the plan's assets is the highest. ( 1 ) A merger is not de minimis if the total present value of accrued benefits merged into a plan, when aggregated with all prior de minimis mergers of and transfers to that plan effective within the same plan year, equals or exceeds 3 percent of the value of the plan's assets.
( 2 ) A transfer is not de minimis if, when aggregated with all previous de minimis mergers and transfers effective within the same plan year— ( i ) The value of all assets transferred from a plan equals or exceeds 3 percent of the value of the plan's assets; or
( ii ) The present value of all accrued benefits transferred to a plan equals or exceeds 3 percent of the plan's assets.
## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office ofHearings Washington, D.C.
MontgomeryAviation, Inc. FAA DOCKET NO. CP (not yet assigned) (EIR 201o-GL-11-0096)

(Civil Penalty Action)

ANSWERTO COMPLAINT 

# RECEIVED MAR -5 2012 

# H!ARING DOCKET

MontgomeryAviation, Inc. responds to the Complaint as follows: I 1. Montgomery admits numbered paragraphs 1 and 2 ofthe Complaint. 2. Montgomery denies numberedparagraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Section I ofthe Complaint. 3. Montgomery denies that itviolated the Federal Aviation Regulations cited in subparagraphs a, b and c. II 1. Montgomery admits numbered paragraph 1 of Section II. 2. Montgomery denies numbered paragraph 2 Section IIto the extent that the penalty sought is not reasonable orjustifiedunder the facts and circumstances. WHEREFORE, MontgomeryAviation, Inc. requests that the Agency action not be upheld.

J.C. B ehlcr, (3743-49)

-.... BU LERASSOCIATES, ATTORNEYS 777 East 86th Street Indianapolis, IN 46240-0924 317-253-8686 317-253-9371 Fax

### Certificate ofService I certify that a copy ofthis document was served upon all parties or counsel by mail, express delivery or personal service onthis February 27, 2012.

Original and One Copy: Hearing Docket FederalAviation Administration Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilberWright Building- Suite 2W10oo Sao Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 One Copy: Mr. Chris Zurales, Senior Attorney, AGL-7K Office of Regional Counsel 2300 East Devon, Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696