alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6083** 

IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. WILLIAM BYRAS, Director SCDC; MONICA WALLACE, Classification SCDC; B. LEWIS, Case Worker SCDC , Defendants

– Appellees , and
C. THOMPSON, Grievanor Co

- Ord SCDC , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 4:11

- cv
- 02837

- MGL )

Submitted : May 23, 2013 Decided: July 5, 2013

Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Irvin Jefferson Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Irvin Jefferson Wilson appeals the district court ’ s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
summary judgment to the Defendants on Wilson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no due process violation, and thus no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jefferson v. Byras , No. 4:11

- cv
- 02837

- MGL (D.S.C. Jan. 14,
2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40095

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SECUNDINO MATA, JR.,

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-402-01

--------------------

February 14, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Counsel appointed to represent Secundino Mata, Jr., has

filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mata has not filed a response. 

 Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw

is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Concord District Court

No. 6394

#### State of New Hampshire *ex rel.*Alice M. Patten v. Ronald Mitton & *a.*

January 31, 1973

*Paul A. Rinden,*by brief and orally, for plaintiff Alice M. Patten.

*Vincent J. Nardi,*by brief and orally, for defendant city of Concord.

Ronald Mitton *pro se,*filed no brief.

Lampron, J.

The issue to be decided is whether the proceeds from the forfeiture of a bond posted as bail in the district court by a defendant in a bastardy proceeding can be ordered paid to the complainant to be applied toward her expenses of confinement and for the support of the child.

On May 15, 1969, the plaintiff filed a bastardy complaint against the defendant under the provisions of RSA ch. 168. He was arrested and released on surety bail of $500 to appear in the district court for a determination of whether there was probable cause to order him to further answer the complaint in the superior court. RSA 168:2. The defendant did not appear and was defaulted. The surety on the bail was notified and paid the $500 which was remitted to the city of Concord.

Thereafter the plaintiff filed a petition seeking an order *27that the city pay the money to her to defray the expenses of confinement and support of the child. The motion was denied by *Matson,*J. who reserved and transferred plaintiff’s exception. There was never any determination made as to the paternity of the defendant.

This court has long recognized that a proceeding under RSA ch. 168 is a civil suit which partakes of criminal forms of procedure. *State v. Tetreault,*97 N.H. 260, 85 A.2d 386 (1952). The latter is especially true as to the complaint, the arrest of the defendant, and his release on bail before probable cause to proceed further is established. This process is usually applicable to criminal proceedings alone. *Marston v. Jenness,*11 N.H. 156, 160 (1840); *Castles v. Welch,*63 N.H. 369 (1885). The bail which the defendant furnished at this stage of the proceeding, like bail in a criminal case, was for the purpose of assuring his presence at a preliminary hearing on probable cause to proceed further in the superior court. If such cause was found, the district court could then order him “to recognize in a reasonable sum with sufficient sureties” to appear at the superior court for a determination as to the paternity of the child. RSA 168:2-4.

When the bail was forfeited in this case no legal obligation on the part of the defendant Mitton toward the complainant or her child had been established. Hence upon the forfeiture of his bail the city of Concord was entitled to the money. *See Belknap County v. Laconia,*80 N.H. 251, 116 A. 434 (1922). The district court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion that the money be paid to her by the city. RSA 597:38. A more efficient method of procedure in paternity cases has been established. RSA ch. 168-A. However it cannot apply to this case. RSA 168-A: 12.

*Plaintiffs exception overruled.*

All concurred.
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement onForm S-3 (No. 333-110930) of Compex Technologies, Inc. and in the relatedProspectus, and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-26053,33-63962, 33-63964, 333-48155, 333-46558, 333-103817 and 333-112330) of ourreport dated August 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Compex Technologies, Inc. included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Motion Granted, Appeal Reinstated, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum 

Opinion filed May 11, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00821-CV

SLL TRANSPORTATION, LLC, AND MEHRAN HAMAN, Appellants

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-64960

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an abated appeal from a judgment signed August 9, 2022. On April 

14, 2023, appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a). The motion is granted.

We reinstate and dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
Circuit Court for Baltimore County

Case No. 03-C-13-012845

Argued: October 7, 2014

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 61

September Term, 2013

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v.

MICHAEL CARL HODES

Barbera, C.J.

Harrell

Battaglia

Greene

Adkins

McDonald

Cathell, Dale R. (Retired,

Specially Assigned)

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: October 7, 2014
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

 * Court of Appeals

v. * of Maryland

 * Misc. Docket AG No. 61 

MICHAEL CARL HODES

 * September Term, 2013

 

 PER CURIAM ORDER

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it

is this 7th day October 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the

Respondent, Michael Carl Hodes, be, and he is hereby, disbarred,

effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the

State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of

Michael Carl Hodes from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to

Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of

the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals

in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the

Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts,

pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761(b), for which sum judgment is

entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland

against Michael Carl Hodes. 

 /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

 Chief Judge
Submitted on record and briefs November 25,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 16, 1992

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Terry Griffith, Claimant. ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, *Petitioner, v.*Terry D. GRIFFITH, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-05396; CA A75092)

842 P2d 467

Adam T. Stamper and Cowling & Heysell, Medford, filed the brief for petitioner.

Roger Ousey and Bischoff & Strooband, P.C., Eugene, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131 (1992).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approved Tribal-State compacts; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Indian Affairs published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on May 16, 2000 (65 FR 31189), concerning a list of approved Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands in the State of California. The list of California Indian Tribes contained an incorrect name for a particular Tribe.                     

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of May 16, 2000, in FR Doc. 00-12322, on page 31189, in the second column, correct the                         **SUMMARY**                         caption listing the tribes, specifically, the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Santa Rosa Reservation to read: Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria.                     

# DATES:

This action is effective May 31, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

Dated: May 18, 2000.

Kevin Gover, 

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 00-13498 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3322] 

# AGENCY:

Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459 ), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority of October 19, 1999, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Gallery for the Arts of Korea,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum, New York, NY from June 2000 to June 2002 is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Carol Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44; 301—4th Street, SW, Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated:  May 19, 2000. 

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 00-13541 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35062-35063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2235-000]


Ouachita Power, L.L.C., Notice of Issuance of Order

May 25, 2000.
    Ouachita Power, L.L.C. (Ouachita Power) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Ouachita Power will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Ouachita Power also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Ouachita Power requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Ouachita Power.
    On May 18, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Ouachita Power should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Ouachita Power is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.

[[Page 35063]]

    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Ouachita Power's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 19, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13640 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 6.34 Petition for review.

Within 40 days after the date of the decision of the Administrative Law judge (or such additional time as is granted by the Administrative Review Board). any party aggrieved thereby who desires review thereof shall file a petition for review of the decision with supporting reasons. Such party shall transmit the petition in writing to the Administrative Review Board, pursuant to part 7 of this title, with a copy thereof to the Chief Administrative Law judge. The petition shall refer to the specific findings of fact, conclusions of law, or order at issue. A petition concerning the decision on debarment shall also state the aggravated or willful violations and/or disregard of obligations to employees and subcontractors, or lack thereof, as appropriate.
§ 99.220 Frequency of audits. Except for the provisions for biennial audits provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, audits required by this part shall be performed annually. Any biennial audit shall cover both years within the biennial period. ( a ) A State or local government that is required by constitution or statute, in effect on January 1, 1987, to undergo its audits less frequently than annually, is permitted to undergo its audits pursuant to this part biennially. This requirement must still be in effect for the biennial period under audit.
( b ) Any non-profit organization that had biennial audits for all biennial periods ending between July 1, 1992, and January 1, 1995, is permitted to undergo its audits pursuant to this part biennially.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-020-00-0777-XX]


Sierra Front/Northwestern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council; 
Notice of Meeting Location and Time

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting location and time for the Sierra Front/
Northwestern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council (Nevada).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), a meeting of the 
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Sierra 
Front/Northwestern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council (Nevada) will 
be held as indicated below. The topic of discussion will be a review of 
the Black Rock Management Plan being prepared by the Winnemucca Field 
Office, and other topics the council may raise.
    The meetings is open to the public. The public may present written 
and/or comments to the council. The public comment period for the 
council meeting will be at 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 14th. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance such as sign 
language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, or who 
desire a hard copy of the agenda, should contact Mike Holbert, 
Winnemucca Field Office, 5100 East Winnemucca Blvd., Winnemucca, NV 
89445, telephone (775) 623-1514 no later than June 10, 2000.

DATES: The council will meet on Wednesday, June 14, 2000, from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Best Western Inn-Fernley, 1405 East Newlands 
Drive, Fernley, Nevada. Public comment on individual topics will be 
received at the discretion of the Council Chairperson, as meeting 
moderator, with a general public comment period on Wednesday, June 14, 
2000, at 4:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Holbert, Associate Field Manager, 
Winnemucca Field Office, 5100 East Winnemucca Blvd., Winnemucca, NV 
89445. Telephone (775) 623-1514.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Michael R. Holbert,
Associate Field Manager, Winnemucca Field Office.
[FR Doc. 00-13165 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P
Exhibit 15











Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549



Commissioners:



We are aware that our report dated October 15
, 2004 on our review of interim financial statements of LCNB Corp. and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 100, as of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 13, 2003. We are also aware of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.







/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.



J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.





Cincinnati, Ohio

October 28, 2004





- 33 -