alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**TIME AND DATE:**                     The 1999 Annual Performance Reviews Committee of the Legal Services Corporation's Board of Directors will meet on January 24, 2000 via tele-conference. The meeting will begin at 12:00 p.m. and continue until conclusion of the Committee's agenda.                

**LOCATION:**                     Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street, NE, Room 11026, Washington, DC 20002, in Room 11026.                

**STATUS OF MEETING:**                     Closed. The closing is authorized by the relevant provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act [5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (10)] and the corresponding provisions of the Legal Services Corporation's implementing regulation [45 CFR 1622.5(h)]. A copy of the General Counsel's Certification that the closing is authorized by law will be available upon request.                

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**

1. Approval of the agenda. 

2. Consider and act on report to the Board of Directors on the annual evaluations of the President and the Inspector General for FY 1999. 

3. Consider and act on other business.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:**                     Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-8810.                

**SPECIAL NEEDS:**                     Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8810.                 

Dated: January 14, 2000.

Victor M. Fortuno, 

Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1325 Filed 1-14-00; 1:19 pm]

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
 

DEC 0 5 2011 Mr. Richard Rhoades 

General Manager 

ASARCO LLC, Mission Complex 

4201 W. Pima Mine Road 

Sahuarita, Arizona 85629 

Dear Mr. Rhoades: 

In accordance with the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.c. 7401 et seq.), the 

Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the application for a renewed title V permit to operate 

for the Mission ine Comple, . 

A request for public comment regarding PAIs proposed title V permit renewal was published on 

S ptember 27, 2011 in the Arizona Daily Star. We rec i d comments from ASARCO and the Pima 

County Department of Environmental Quality. We have enclosed our response to these comments, and the 

tinal permit and statement of basis. 

After consideration of the expressed view of all interested persons, and all pertinent federal statutes and 

regulations, EPA hereby issues a renewed title V permit to operate for SARCO LLC. Mission 

Complex. 

Any person may petition the Environmental Appeals Board to review the En ironment' I Prot ction 

Agency pennit decision. Such a petition shall include a statement ofthe reasons suppoliing the request 

for revie , including a demonstration that any issues being raised w re raised during the public 

comment period to the extent required by 40 CFR §71.11 and, when appropriate. a showing that the 

condition in qu stion is ba ed n: 

(1)	 A finding of fact or conclusion of law \vhich is clearly crroneOll 

(2)	 AI exercise of discretion or an important policy con ideration which the 

Environmental Appeals Board should, in its discretion, rc iew. 

An appeal to the Environmental Appeals Board for review of this permit decision mu t be filed not later 

than January 4, 2012 with the Hearing Clerk at the following addreSS: 

. . Environmental Protection Agency 

Clerk of the Bard, Environmental Appeal Board (M 11038) 

Ariel Ri s Building . 

1200 Pennsyl ania A enue, .W. 

Washington, DC 204606-0001 

Prinl~d on Rtcyc/~d Paper 
This permit shall become effective on January 4, 2012 unless a petition is filed to review any conditions 

of this pennit as descri ed above (in which case the specific terms and conditions of the permit which 

are the subject of the request for review will be stayed). This pennit is valid for a period of five years 

and shall expire at midnight on the date five years after its date of issuance unless a timely and complete 

renewal application has been submitted at least six months, but not more than 18 months, prior to the 

date of expiration of the permit. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Roger Kohn of the Air Division Permits 

Office at (415) 972-3973 or kohn.roger@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosures 

cc:	 Ned Norris, Tohono O'odham Nation 

Mukonde Chama, PDEQ
Exhibit 10(i)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                      TO THE MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                        1988 DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN

     The MCI  Communications  Corporation  1988 Directors'  Stock Option Plan is
hereby amended as follows effective as of November 1, 1996:

1.  Section 2.3(c) is hereby restated in its entirety to read as follows:

     "(c) If an optionee's  directorship terminates and no Revocation of Options
has  occurred,  any option that the  optionee is entitled to exercise  under the
terms of paragraph (b) above must be exercised by the earlier of: (i) five years
following  termination of the  directorship,  or (ii) the expiration date of the
option.  In the event that an optionee dies while serving as a director,  and if
no Revocation of Options has occurred,  any option that the optionee is entitled
to exercise  under the terms of  paragraph  (b) above must be  exercised  by the
earlier of: (i) five years after the optionee's death by the  administrators  or
executors  of the  optionee's  estate or by the  person or  persons  to whom the
optionee's  rights  under  the  option  shall  have  passed  by  will  or by the
applicable laws of descent or  distribution,  or (ii) the expiration date of the
option.  If  an  optionee's   directorship  terminates  due  to  the  optionee's
disability  within  the  meaning  of Section  22(e)(3)  of the Code,  any option
granted to such optionee  under the Plan may be exercised by the earlier of: (i)
five  years  of the  termination  of the  optionee's  directorship,  or (ii) the
expiration  date of the  option.  Any such  exercise  following  the  optionee's
disability may be made only by such optionee or his personal representative."

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  MCI  COMMUNICATIONS   CORPORATION  has  caused  this
Amendment No. 2 to be executed and attested by its duly authorized  officers and
its corporate seal to be affixed hereto as of this 1st day of November, 1996.

                                          MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                                           /s/ Bert C. Roberts, Jr.
                                          --------------------------
                                           Bert C. Roberts, Jr.
ATTEST:                                    Chairman

/s/ C. Bolton-Smith, Jr.
-------------------------
C. Bolton-Smith, Jr.
Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, August 11, 2011, 1 p.m. to August 11, 2011, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room                           ( print page 49493)                        3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 26, 2011, 76 FR 44598.                

The meeting was rescheduled for August 12, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: August 4, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-20323 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### REED v REED

Ohio Supreme Court

No 21571.

Decided June 19, 1929

Syllabus by

ALLEN, J.

DIVORCE & ALIMONY — Real Estate (510 J)

(230 S) Service by publication is authorized by 11292 and 11984 GC, in an action for divorce, alimony and equitable relief, and the trial court has power to make an alimony decree where the only relief sought is the appropriation of real property of the husband, situated within the county, to the payment of the amount that should be allowed for such alimony and support.

Such an action is substantially one in rem, and when the petition specifically describes the real property in question, the court h_as jurisdiction, upon completion of service by publication and hearing upon the merits, to decree the relief sought.

Under 11998 GC, the decree entered in one county may be made a lien upon real property of the defendant lying within another county in the state.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Jones and. Day, JJ, concur. Matthias, J, concurs in propositions 1 and 2 of the syllabus and in the judgment.
§ 417.16 Initiation of proceedings. ( a ) Any member of a local labor organization may file a complaint with the Office of Labor-Management Standards alleging that following a finding by the Administrative Review Board pursuant to subpart A that the constitution and bylaws of the labor organization pertaining to the removal of officers are inadequate, or a stipulation of compliance with the provisions of section 401(h) of the Act reached with the Chief, DOE in connection with a prior charge of the inadequacy of a union's constitution and bylaws to remove officers, as provided in subpart A of this part, the labor organization ( 1 ) has failed to act within a reasonable time, or
( 2 ) has violated the procedures agreed to with the Chief, DOE, or
( 3 ) has violated the principles governing adequate removal procedures under § 417.2(b).
( b ) The complaint must be filed pursuant to section 402(a) of the Act within one calendar month after one of the two following conditions has been met: ( 1 ) The member has exhausted the remedies available to him under the constitution and bylaws of the organization, or
( 2 ) The member has invoked such remedies without obtaining a final decision within three calendar months after invoking them.
[59 FR 65716, Dec. 21, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6093, Feb. 10, 1997; 78 FR 8025, Feb. 5, 2013]
Submitted on record and briefs November 16,

convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing December 30, 1992,

reconsideration denied April 28,

petition for review allowed May 25, 1993 (316 Or 527)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*CODY HOWARD JOHNSON, *Appellant.*

(91C-20029; CA A71708)

844 P2d 935

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*530PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree, attempted murder and two counts of burglary in the first degree. ORS 163.375; ORS 163.115; ORS 161.405; ORS 164.225. He was sentenced to 60 months incarceration for the attempted murder, to be served consecutively to an incarceration term of 80 months for the rape conviction, the primary offense. OAR 253-03-001(17). He was sentenced to 20 months on the burglary convictions, which were merged, also to be served consecutively to the primary offense. He argues that the court erred in calculating the term for attempted murder. He contends that, according to OAR 253-04-005(1), attempted murder is in category 9 on the Crime Seriousness Scale and, as a consecutive sentence, the incarceration term is the one in Criminal History Column I. OAR 253-12-020(2) (a) (B). Under those rules, he contends, the maximum term is 36 months.

The state concedes that the court erred but argues that all the sentences should be vacated so that the court can “fashion a sentencing package commensurate with defendant’s crimes and within the sentencing guidelines,” perhaps by departure sentences, although it acknowledges that no departure sentence was requested by the prosecutor or imposed. The error was in the sentence for attempted murder. Although a court may rely on alternative authority to fashion a new sentence for one that was imposed erroneously, it may not resentence on offenses for which sentences have already been lawfully imposed. *State v. Smith,*116 Or App 558, 842 P2d 805 (1992).

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on conviction for attempted murder.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20567]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1777]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 216 Under Alternative Site 
Framework, Olympia, WA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 
FR 1170, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 71069-
71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the Port of Olympia, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 216, 
submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 31-2011, filed 05/09/
2011) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service area of 
Thurston County and portions of Kitsap, Lewis and Mason Counties, 
Washington, within and adjacent to the Olympia U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, and FTZ 216's existing Sites 1-7 and 9-13 
would be categorized as magnet sites, existing Site 8 would be deleted 
and acreage reduced at existing Sites 1, 3, 4 and 13;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (76 FR 27987, 05/13/2011) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 216 under the alternative site 
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, and 
to five-year ASF sunset provisions for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Sites 1-7 and 9-13 if not activated by August 
31, 2016.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of August 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-20567 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wizzard Software Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB-A1 for the period ending September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, CEO and President, and John
Busshaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated: 1/31/07              Signature:     /s/ Christopher J. Spencer
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Christopher J. Spencer
                                          President and CEO

Dated: 1/31/07              Signature:     /s/ John Busshaus
                                          --------------------------
                                          John Busshaus
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-8998-5]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The MHA Nation proposes to construct, own and operate a 13,000 barrels-per-day petroleum refinery on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation near Makoti in North Dakota. The refinery will produce diesel fuel, gasoline and propane. The NPDES permit will be for surface water discharges associated with the operation of the refinery.

                        EPA's decision to issue the NPDES permit is based on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the Fact Sheet for the NPDES permit and the administrative record for the project. EPA and the Bureau of Indian Affairs issued the draft EIS in June 2006 and the final EIS (FEIS) in August 2009. Since the FEIS was issued, the MHA Nation decided to change the refinery feedstock from synthetic crude oil to the Bakken formation crude. As a result of the feedstock change, EPA evaluated the potential changes in impacts and the analysis in the FEIS. EPA's evaluation is summarized in a Supplemental Information Report (SIR). The FEIS, ROD and SIR are available for review at                         *http://www.epa.gov/​region8/​compliance/​nepa/​mharefinery.html.*                         The appeal period for the NPDES permit decision ends 30 days from the date of this notice in accordance with 40 CFR 124.19.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Dana Allen;                         *Allen.dana@epa.gov*, (303) 312-6870 regarding the ROD and SIR and Mr. Robert Brobst;                         *Brobst.bob@epa.gov*, (303) 312-6129 regarding the NPDES permit; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street; Denver, Colorado, 80202-1129.                    

Dated: August 9, 2011.

Susan E. Bromm,

Director, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2011-20601 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 780.324 Requirements for the exemption to apply. ( a ) All the following conditions must be met in order for the exemption to apply to an employee: ( 1 ) He must be “engaged in agriculture”;
( 2 ) Be “principally engaged”;
( 3 ) On the “range”, and
( 4 ) In the “production of livestock.”
( b ) Since the raising of livestock is included in the definition of agriculture under section 3(f) of the Act (see §§ 780.119-780.121 of subpart B of this part), the range production of livestock would normally be deemed agriculture work, and, consequently, an employee, during this time he is engaged in such activities, would meet the basic requirement of the exemption that he be “employed in agriculture.”
The following sections discuss the meaning and application of the other requirements.
#### Rosina Violano et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Michael Violano, Deceased, Appellants, *v.*Maryland Casualty Company, Respondent.

Argued June 9, 1957;

decided July 13, 1937.

*519
      *Jay Leo Rothschild, Nathan*Weinstein and *Isidore L. Weishar*for appellants.

*George J. Stacy, James J. Manoney*and *Frederick L. Thielmann*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Crane, Ch. J., Hobbs, Loügíiran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.
Sanitized – Attachment 001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Mark IV Industries, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  404,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,700
<INVENTORY>                                    377,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               845,500
<PP&E>                                         701,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,974,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          480,900
<BONDS>                                        528,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           700
<OTHER-SE>                                     757,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,974,600
<SALES>                                      2,076,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,076,000
<CGS>                                        1,408,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,852,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               112,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                  23,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        


</TABLE>