alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Jack E. Golsen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LSB.
 
 
 /s/ Jack E. Golsen
 Jack E. Golsen
 Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive officer)
 
 
 March 3, 2011
 
 
 This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThreats and countermeasures for network securityIn the late 1980's, the traditional threat of anonymous break-ins to networked computers was joined by viruses and worms, multiplicative surrogates that carry out the bidding of their authors. Technologies for authentication and secrecy, supplemented by good management practices, are the principal countermeasures. Four articles on these subjects are presented.Document ID19920002427Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDenning, Peter J.*(Research Inst. for Advanced Computer Science Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 8, 1991Subject CategoryComputer Operations And HardwareReport/Patent NumberRIACS-TR-91-2NASA-CR-188883NAS 1.26:188883Meeting InformationMeeting: Annual Computer Virus and Security ConferenceLocation: New York, NYCountry: United StatesStart Date: March 14, 1991End Date: March 15, 1991Accession Number92N11645Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920002427.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24-a


                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints each of William J. Cadogan, Robert E. Switz and David
F. Fisher, with full power to each to act without the other, his or her true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution, for him or
her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the "Company")
for the Company's fiscal year ended October 31, 1997, and any or all amendments
to said Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and to file the same with such other authorities as necessary,
granting unto each such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each such
attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 2nd day
of December, 1997, by the following persons.


/s/  William J. Cadogan                      /s/  James C. Castle
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
William J. Cadogan                           James C. Castle, Ph.D.


/s/  Thomas E. Holloran                      /s/  B. Kristine Johnson
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Thomas E. Holloran                           B. Kristine Johnson


/s/  Charles W. Oswald                       /s/  Irene M. Qualters
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Charles W. Oswald                            Irene M. Qualters


/s/  Alan E. Ross                            /s/  Jean-Pierre Rosso
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Alan E. Ross                                 Jean-Pierre Rosso


/s/  Donald M. Sullivan                      /s/  John D. Wunsch
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Donald M. Sullivan                           John D. Wunsch


/s/  Warde F. Wheaton
-----------------------------------
Warde F. Wheaton
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher L.
Boone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christopher L.
Boone





Christopher
L. Boone


Chief
Financial Officer


February
27, 2009





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
other purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         328,030
<SECURITIES>                                    47,492
<RECEIVABLES>                                  409,718<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,687
<INVENTORY>                                    175,763<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               998,892
<PP&E>                                         496,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 226,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,462,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          411,821
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,766
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,016,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,462,232
<SALES>                                      1,547,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,547,383
<CGS>                                          799,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  799,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               488,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,557
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                262,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                    88,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            173,779
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   173,779
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT IS NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBTS AND RETURNS
<F2>AMOUNT IS NET OF OBSOLESCENSE RESERVES
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 810.125 Workers paid on a non-hourly basis. ( a ) *General.* If any worker performing direct production work is compensated by a method other than hourly, such as a salary, piece-rate, or day-rate basis, the worker's hourly base wage rate shall be calculated by converting the salary, piece-rate, or day-rate to an hourly equivalent. This hourly equivalent is then multiplied by the number of hours worked in direct production for purposes of calculating the average hourly base wage rate.
( b ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) Where the salary, piece-rate, or day-rate wage is paid to a worker on a weekly or bi-weekly pay period basis, the total salary, piece-rate, or day-rate compensation for that pay period will be divided by the total number of hours worked in the pay period to determine the hourly equivalent.
( 2 ) Where the salary, piece-rate, or day-rate wage is paid to a worker on a semi-monthly pay period basis, the total salary, piece-rate, or day-rate compensation will be converted to a weekly equivalent by multiplying the compensation by 24 (semi-monthly pay periods in a year) and dividing by 52 (weeks per year). This weekly equivalent will be divided by the total number of hours worked in the week to determine the hourly equivalent.
( 3 ) Where the salary, piece-rate, or day-rate wage is paid to a worker on a monthly pay period basis, the total salary, piece-rate, or day-rate compensation will be converted to a weekly equivalent by multiplying the compensation by 12 (monthly pay periods in a year) and dividing by 52 (weeks per year). This weekly equivalent will be divided by the total number of hours worked in the week to determine the hourly equivalent.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33377-33378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 31, 2000.

PLACE: NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

STATUS:  Open to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  
7009A--Marine Accident Report: Ramming of the Eads Bridge by Barges in 
Tow of the M/V Anne Holly with Subsequent Ramming and near breakaway of 
the President of the Casino on the Admiral, St. Louis, Missouri, on 
April 4, 1998.

[[Page 33378]]


NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodation should contact Mrs. 
Barbara Bush at (202) 314-6220 by Friday, May 26, 2000.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhonda Underwood (202) 314-6065.

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
Rhonda Underwood,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13091 Filed 5-19-00; 2:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Facts About Working Women: A Graphic Presentation Based on Census Statistics and Studies of the Women's Bureau

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Facts About Working Women: A Graphic Presentation Based on Census Statistics and Studies of the Women's Bureau : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 46*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1925,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5363,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit
32.1






Section 906
Certification





The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of
the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350).





The
undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the MLM Index TM Fund.





October
31, 2008








By: /s/TimothyJ.Rudderow


Timothy J. Rudderow


President


Mount
Lucas Management Corporation,


the
manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
(77 South. 1004)

#### MOUNTAIN v. DUPREE.

(4 Div. 544.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 24, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Houston County; H. A. Pearce, Judge.

B. F. Reid, of Dothan, for appellee.

BRICKEN, J.

Affirmed on certificate.
(75 South. 1007)

#### STEEN v. STATE.

(6 Div. 332.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from City Court of Bessemer; J. C. B. Gwin,' Judge.

Mathews & Mathews, of Bessemer, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Ben G. Perry, of Bessemer, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by agreement.
Argued and submitted December 9, 1992,

reversed and remanded March 10, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Mary Delohery KLAR, nka Malia Delohery, *Appellant, and*Matthew David KLAR, *Respondent.*

(91-9-23; CA A73444)

848 P2d 144

William J. Hedges, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Hedges & Mitchell, Oregon City.

Kathryn Smith Root, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Johnston & Root, P.C., Portland.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Richardson and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*539PER CURIAM

Mother appeals from a judgment that dismissed her motion to modify the support provisions of the parties’ 1982 Colorado dissolution judgment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 The Colorado judgment required father to pay $250 per month for the support of the parties’ child. After the Colorado judgment was issued, mother and the child moved to Oregon, and father moved to Michigan. In 1991, mother sought to register the Colorado judgment in Oregon and moved to modify the support award. Father was personally served in Michigan and appeared at the show cause hearing where the trial court dismissed the motion *sua sponte.*On appeal, father contends that the court did not have jurisdiction because the judgment was not properly registered in Oregon.

Even if the judgment was not properly registered under ORS 24.1152 and ORS 24.125, subject matter jurisdiction exists because the children are residents of Oregon. *See Burback and Burback,*81 Or App 74, 78, 724 P2d 853, *rev den*302 Or 299 (1986). In *Burback,*we also rejected the argument made by the father that ORS 24.115 and ORS 110.281 do not authorize an Oregon court to modify the support provisions of a foreign dissolution judgment. 81 Or App at 78 n 2. Father’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Reversed and remanded. Costs to mother.

1

 We do not decide whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over father, because that issue was not litigated in the trial court.

2

 ORS 24.115 was amended after *Burback*was decided. However, the pertinent statutory language was not changed. *See*Or Laws 1987, ch 586, § 14. The statute now provides, in part:

> “(3) A [foreign] judgment so filed has the same effect and is subject to the same procedures, defenses and proceedings for reopening, vacating or staying as a judgment of a court of any county of this state and may be enforced or satisfied in like manner.”
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 427 

Congratulating the University of California at Berkeley men’s water polo 

team for winning the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2008 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of California at Berkeley 

men’s water polo team for winning the 2007 National 

Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Championship. 

Whereas the University of California at Berkeley (California) 

Golden Bears won the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic 

Association (NCAA) Men’s Water Polo Championship, 8– 

6, over the University of Southern California Trojans on 

December 2, 2007, at the Avery Aquatics Center at Stanford University; 

Whereas the California Golden Bears had a 28–4 overall 

record during the 2007 season; 

Whereas in 2007 the California Golden Bears won a Division 

I men’s water polo title for the 2nd year in a row and 

the 13th time in school history; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 427 ATS 

Whereas Michael Sharf was named the 2007 NCAA Tournament Most Valuable Player, Zac Monsees, and Jeff 

Tyrrell were named to the NCAA Tournament 1st team, 

and Spencer Warden was named to the NCAA Tournament 2nd team; and 

Whereas Michael Sharf, Zac Monsees, and Mark Sheredy 

were named as first-team All-Americans, Adam Haley 

was named a second-team All-American, and Jeff Tyrrell 

and Spencer Warden were selected as third-team AllAmericans for their exceptional contributions during the 

2007 season: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Univer2 sity of California at Berkeley men’s water polo team for 

3 winning the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association 

4 Division I Championship. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### § 4071.3 Penalty amount.

The maximum daily amount of the penalty under section 4071 of ERISA shall be $2,670.

[62 FR 36994, July 10, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 29766, May 13, 2016; 82 FR 8814, Jan. 31, 2017; 83 FR 1556, Jan. 12, 2018; 83 FR 67074, Dec. 28, 2018; 85 FR 2305, Jan. 15, 2020; 86 FR 2542, Jan. 13, 2021; 87 FR 2341, Jan. 14, 2022; 88 FR 1992, Jan. 12, 2023; 89 FR 2133, Jan. 12, 2024]
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                    MARSH SUPERMARKETS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           State of         Name under which Business
Name as Specified                       Incorporation        Done if Different from
   in Charter                          or Organization      Name Specified in Charter
   ----------                          ---------------      -------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                  <C>
Marsh Drugs, Inc.                          Indiana          Marsh Drugs
Marsh Village Pantries, Inc.               Indiana          Village Pantry
Mundy Realty, Inc.                         Indiana
Mar Properties, Inc.                       Indiana
Marlease, Inc.                             Indiana
Marsh International, Inc.                  Indiana          Marsh International
Temporary Services, Inc.                   Indiana
Limited Holdings, Inc.                     Indiana
Marsh P.Q., Inc.                           Indiana
Marsh Cultural Group, Inc.                 Indiana
North Marion Development Corp.             Indiana
Contract Transport, Inc.                   Indiana
Crystal Food Services, LLC                 Indiana          Crystal Food Services,
                                                            Primo Catering, Capital
                                                            Vending
LoBill Foods, LLC                          Indiana          LoBill
Contract Transport, LLC                    Indiana
Marsh Supermarkets, LLC                    Indiana          Marsh
Village Pantry, LLC                        Indiana          Village Pantry
Marsh Drugs, LLC                           Indiana          Marsh Drugs
Trademark Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
Marsh Clearing House, LLC                  Indiana


Crystal Cafe Management Group, LLC         Indiana          Crystal
Crystal Food Management Services, LLC      Indiana
Butterfield Foods, LLC                     Indiana          Butterfield
Floral Fashions, LLC                       Indiana          Floral Fashions
O'Malia Food Markets, LLC                  Indiana          O'Malia Food Markets,
                                                            Joe O'Malia
                                                            Food Markets
CF Property, LLC                           Indiana
BF Property, LLC                           Indiana
CSD Property, LLC                          Indiana
MD Property, LLC                           Indiana
MS Property, LLC                           Indiana
Pantry Property, LLC                       Indiana
McNamara, LLC                              Indiana
MCN Property, LLC                          Indiana
Floral Property, LLC                       Indiana
LB Property, LLC                           Indiana

</TABLE>
#### § 580.17 Retention of official record.

The official record of every completed administrative hearing provided by this part shall be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief Administrative Law Judge.