alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 2, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark A.
Varner, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark A. Varner
---------------------------
Mark A. Varner
Interim Chief Financial Officer
June 23, 2005
AMENDMENT
2008-1




MERCURY
GENERAL CORPORATION




PROFIT
SHARING PLAN




WHEREAS, Mercury General
Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Mercury General Corporation Profit
Sharing Plan (the “Plan”); and




WHEREAS, pursuant to Section
9.1 of the Plan, the Company is authorized to amend the Plan; and




WHEREAS, the Company desires
to amend the Plan to reflect certain changes in the newly adopted automatic
enrollment procedures put into effect as of January 1, 2008; and




WHEREAS, the Company desires
to amend the Plan to reflect certain changes in eligibility provisions in
Section 2.1(b) with respect to automatic enrollment in the Plan.




NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
amended, effective as of the dates specified below, as follows.




1.  The
Section 2.1(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new
paragraph at the end thereof, effective September 1, 2008, to read as
follows:





“Notwithstanding
the foregoing, effective September 1, 2008, each Employee who becomes an
Eligible Employee on or after September 1, 2008 shall become eligible to make
Compensation Deferrals to the Plan in accordance with Section 3.2 (and to
receive allocations of Employer Matching Contributions on such Compensation
Deferrals in accordance with Section 3.3) as of the first day of the month next
following the latest of (1) the completion of 60 days of employment as an
Employee of the Company, (2) his attainment of age 18, or (3) the date on which
he becomes an Eligible Employee.”




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has caused its duly authorized officers to execute this amendment to the
Plan this 29th day of
August, 2008.













MERCURY
      GENERAL CORPORATIONBy:   /s/
      GABRIEL TIRADORIts:   President
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07
- 22
- 00149
- CR No. 07
- 22
- 001 50
- CR RINO REY ACOSTA , A PPELLANT V. STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 100th District Court Childress County, Texas Trial Court No s . 6606 & 6607 , Honorable Stuart Messer , Presiding



### December 2, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant , Rino Rey Acosta, appeals from the trial court’s judgments adjudicating him guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation. 1 The appellate record was originally due September 8, 2022

. The clerk ’ s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter ’ s record was not. We subsequently granted the reporter an extension to file the reporter ’ s record. By letter of October 11 , 2022 , we admonished the reporter that failure to file the

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 30.02.2

reporter ’ s record by October 24 c ould result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice

. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication with this Court. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 35.3(c) ( “ The trial and appella te courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. ” ); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “ make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights ” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following: 1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter ’ s record; 2. why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks; 3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and 4. whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable. Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days to comple te, certify, and file the reporter ’ s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental clerk ’ s record and cause that record to be filed with this C ourt by January 2, 2023.3

Should the reporter file the reporter’s record on or before December 16, 2022, s he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in wri ting, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish. Quinn, C.J., not par ticipating.
Exhibit 32

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

R. Ray Pate, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Rebecca B. Crunk,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NCRIC Group, Inc. (the
"Company"), each certify in his/her capacity as an officer of the Company that
he/she has reviewed the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 and that to the best of his/her knowledge:

(1)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


  May 12, 2004                 /s/ R. Ray Pate, Jr.
  ------------                 --------------------
  Date                         R. Ray Pate, Jr.
                               President and Chief Executive Officer


  May 12, 2004                 /s/ Rebecca B. Crunk
  ------------                 --------------------
  Date                         Rebecca B. Crunk
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


                                       19
#### § 93.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40045 Summary Calendar

**Imeh U. Affiah,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus

**Texas Southmost College; Lissa Frausto; Mike Shannon,** 

Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:18

- CV

- 196

Before **Clement, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Imeh Affiah sued Texas Southmost College under Title VII , alleging

rac ial discrimination , hostile work environment, and retaliation

. The district court granted summary judgment for the C ollege on all counts. We affirm.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 6, 2020
Lyle W. Ca yce Clerk Case: 20-40045 Document: 00515629542 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2020No. 20

- 40045

2 It is illegal under Tit le VII for an employer to discharge an employee because of “race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

– 2(a). Under the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden shifting analysis, the plaintiff must first make a prima facie case of discrimi nation. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973). If he can , the burden shifts
to the defendant to “articulate a legitimate non

- discriminatory reason for the adverse employment action.” E.E.O.C. v. Chevron Phillips Chem. Co. , 570 F.3d 606, 615 (5th Cir. 2009). Then the burden shifts back to the plaintiff to show the stated reason is “pretextual.” Burton v. Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc. , 798 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir. 2015).
Affiah points to no evidence that can support his claim s. Meanwhile , Texas Southmost College’s evidence is uncontroverted and insurmountable

. The C ollege hired Affiah as a d ean for the 2016

– 17 school year. Within months, nine students and employees filed complaints documenting “detailed instances of unprofessi onal behavior and harassment .”

Affiah told one female student her voice was “sexy,” placed his hand on her shoulder, and asked her on a date. He searched the Internet about a professor , then asked if she had a boyfriend and t old her he was looking for a
La tina woman. He threatened to “call immigration” on a fellow employee.
These are on top of staff complaints about Affiah’s intimidating and unprofessional conduct

. At the district court, Affiah made “no attempt to controvert this evidence, other than conclu sory statements that the evidence is fabricated.” His appeal here follows the same baseless tack

. The C ollege was well justified to place Affiah on administrative leave and decline his

contract.

**AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-40045 Document: 00515629542 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/06/2020
#### § 516.29 Employees employed by a private entity operating an amusement or recreational establishment located in a national park or national forest or on land in the National Wildlife Refuge System who are partially exempt from overtime pay requirements pursuant to section 13(b)(29) of the Act.

With respect to each employee who is partially exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Act pursuant to section 13(b)(29), the employer shall maintain and preserve the records required in § 516.2, except that the record of the regular hourly rate of pay in § 516.2(a)(6) shall be required only in a workweek when overtime compensation is due under section 13(b)(29).
**Exhibit 10.14**

**AMENDMENT 2006-1**

**MERCURY GENERAL CORPORATION**

**PROFIT SHARING PLAN**

**WHEREAS,**Mercury General Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Mercury General Corporation Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”); and 

**WHEREAS,** pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company is authorized to amend the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS,**theCompany deems it desirable to modify the Plan’s provisions to provide for an automatic rollover to an individual retirement account designated by the Plan Administrator of account balances of in excess of $1,000 on termination of employment,where the Participant fails to elect a cash distribution or a direct rollover to an eligible retirement plan, in accordance with Section 401(a)(31)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** effective as of March 28, 2005, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

Section 7.1(e) is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph to the end thereof: 

“Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective as of March 28, 2005, in the event of a mandatory distribution greater than $1,000 in accordance withthe provisions of this section 7.1, if the Participant does not elect to have such distribution paid directly to an eligible retirement plan specified by the Participant in a direct rollover or to receive the distribution directly in accordance withthis Section 7.1, then the Plan Administrator will pay the distribution in a direct rollover to an individual retirement plan designated by the Plan Administrator.” 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**this Amendment 2006-1 is hereby adopted this 24th day of January, 2007.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34664-34668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13522]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00-35]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

[[Page 34665]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 00-35 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: May 24, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[[Page 34666]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MY00.024


[[Page 34667]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MY00.025


[[Page 34668]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN31MY00.026

[FR Doc. 00-13522 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34988-34989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1062; MM Docket No. 99-341; RM-9776]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Gwinn, MI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document allots Channel 262C3 to Gwinn, Michigan, in 
response to a petition filed by AFB/Gwinn Broadcasting. See 64 FR 
68665, December 8, 1999. The coordinates for Channel 262C3 at Gwinn are 
46-17-20 NL and 87-21-10 WL. There is a site restriction 6.8 kilometers 
(4.3 miles) east of the community. Canadian concurrence has been 
received for the allotment of Channel 262C3 at Gwinn. With this action, 
this docketed proceeding is terminated. A filing window for Channel 
262C3 at Gwinn will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue of 
opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective June 26, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 99-341, adopted May 3, 2000, and released May 
12, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's 
Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete 
text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-
3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Michigan, is 
amended by adding Gwinn, Channel 262C3.


[[Page 34989]]


Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-13594 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
CONSULTINGAGREEMENT

 

       This Consulting Agreement for the exchange of consulting services for fees is byand between Twin Faces East Entertainment Corporation (TFAC), a NevadaCorporation located at 94 Arthur Hills Court, Henderson, NV. 89074, andCrawmerica, (Craw) Inc. of Las Vegas, NV collectively referred to as "TheParties".

 

       WHEREAS, TFAC is a developer of intellectual and entertainment properties, and

 

       WHEREAS, Craw has various connections and networking contacts in the sportsentertainment and development business,

 

       NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants provided herein, TheParties agree as follows:

 

       Craw shall provide services to TFAC on an as requested basis and in any capacityas requested by TFAC for business development and maintenance of the business,

 

       TFAC shall compensate Craw for these services as follows:

-  Twenty    Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) in fees payable the earlier of August 1,    2003 or the Company's receipt of funding in the amount of $1 million or    greater.
       The term of this Agreement is for the year 2003 at which time all obligationsunder this agreement shall cease.

 

       IN WITNESS THEREOF, TFAC has executed this Agreement effective as of the datesigned below.

 

       **/S/Michael Smolanoff  **                                                                                        **June 30, 2003**
       Michael Smolanoff,President                                                                                   Date

       Twin Faces East Entertainment Corporation

 

       **/S/Paul Crawford  **                                                                                               **June 30, 2003**
       Paul M. Crawford,President                                                                                    Date

       Crawmerica, Inc.
```

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Lynch  Corporation,  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Eugene
Hynes, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.
C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

March 28, 2006
                                     /s/ Eugene Hynes
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Name: Eugene Hynes
                                     Title: Principal Financial Officer
```
#### § 452.129 Non-discrimination.

Further, distinctions in representational strength among or within locals may not be based on arbitrary and unreasonable factors such as race, sex, or class of membership based on type of employment.
#### Reid *et al. v.*Norfolk City R. Co. *et al.*

*(Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia,*

*Nov. 9, 1894.)*

[21 S. E. Rep. 27.]

Appeal — Defective Supersedeas Bond — Dismissal.

Where a supersedeas is awarded, but the bond on appeal required by Code 1887, §§ 3470, 3471, is conditioned to pay only costs and damages, and not the debt, the court will, on motion, discharge the supersedeas, but will allow the appeal to remain in force on filing a new bond.

Appeal from circuit court of city of Norfolk.

Action by the Norfolk City Railroad Company and others against D. P. Reid & Bro. Prom the judgment, defendants appeal. A supersedeas was awarded them by the supreme court of appeals, but the bond was conditioned to pay costs and damages only, and not the debt. The appellee moved to dismiss both appeal and supersedeas, because a proper bond had not been given, as required by Code 1887, §§ 3470, 3471; whereupon the appellants made a counter motion to discharge the supersedeas and allow the appeal to remain in force, which latter motion the court sustained, but required another bond.

*Harmerson, Heath & Heath,*for appellant.

*White és Garnett,*for appellee.

This day came the parties-by counsel, and the court having maturely considered the motion of the appellees to £ ‘dismiss *87this cause for the reason that the appellants have failed to give a proper bond, as required by sections 3é70 and 3é71 of the Code of Virginia of 1887,” doth overrule said motion. And thereupon, on motion of the appellants, it is ordered that the order allowing an appeal and supersedeas in this cause be modified so as to allow an appeal only, not to operate as a supersedeas to, or in any manner hinder or delay the execution of, said decree, upon the said appellants, or one of them, or some one for them, executing before the clerk of the said circuit court a bond in the penalty of $300, conditioned for the payment of all damages, costs, and fees which may be awarded against or incurred by said appellants, and that a certificate of the clerk of said circuit court that said bond has been given, and the names of the sureties therein endorsed on a copy of this order, be filed with the clerk of this court within 60 days from this day ; and, unless such bond be given and such certificate filed as aforesaid, it is ordered that said appeal be dismissed. And it is ordered that a copy of this order be certified to the clerk of said circuit court.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   GENCOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


All of the operating subsidiaries of Gencor Industries, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation, listed below are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements:

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                               State in Which  Country in Which
                                                Incorporated     Incorporated
                                               --------------  ----------------
<S>                                            <C>             <C> 
General Combustion Corporation                     Florida

Thermotech Systems Corporation                     Florida

General Combustion Limited                                          England

Bituma-Stor, Inc.                                   Iowa

Bituma Corporation                               Washington

The Davis Line, Inc.                               Indiana

Equipment Services Group, Inc.                     Florida

California Pellet Mill Company                   California

CPM/Europe Limited                                                  Ireland

CPM/Europe S.A.                                                     France

CPM/Europe B.V.                                                   Netherlands

CPM/Pacific (Private) Limited                                      Singapore

Gigantissimo 2046 AB                                                Sweden

California Pellet Mill Europe Limited                            United Kingdom
</TABLE> 

                                      -23-