alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1132 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

5) II-C-2 

Docket Number: 

A-86-03 

Printed 4/18/2008 2:24:46 PM Sheet 5 of 122 
P.2 

fl-ft,-03 JL-t-JL 

\M-r 

**'"-£< \6 ^ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

v» 

Mr. George A. Schaefe r 

Chairman and Chief Executiv e Office r OFFICEOF 

_ . . , . _ AIR AND RADIATION 

Caterpillar, inc. 

Peoria, Illinois 61629 

Dear Mr. Schaefer: 

Thank you for your letter describing your concerns with 

meeting the 1991 and 1994 diesel particulate standards and the 

effect of fuel sulfur content on such compliance. Briefly 

recapping our efforts in this area to date, in June of 1986 we 

distributed for comment a preliminary report on the effects of 

diesel fuel quality on emissions and performance. We have been 

analyzing the comments received on this report, and in addition 

have been preparing more detailed analyses of some of the key 

issues such as the effect of sulfur on engine wear, the 

conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfate in the atmosphere and 

the effect of sulfur content on required engine control 

technology and cost. These analyses will be compiled into a 

study to be completed near the end of this year. A decision to 

proceed with a formal rulemaking aimed at regulating diesel 

fuel quality will be made upon completion of this study. 

One of the more difficult aspects of this study is our 

evaluation of the types of technologies that would be used to 

meet the 1991 and 1994 heavy-duty diesel particulate standards 

on current fuel versus a low-sulfur fuel and any resultant cost 

differential. We 'have requested detailed projections on this 

issue from ail of the heavy-duty engine manufacturers in our 

meetings on trap development efforts. To date, a number of 

manufacturers have submitted general statements concerning the 

effect of low sulfur fuel on potential compliance. However, 

little detailed information supported by complete test data has 

been received. Such information is critical if EPA is to 

accurately quantify the effect of aiesel fuel sulfur control on 

the heavy-duty diesel industry, and determine the industry's 

ability to meet the 1991 and 1994 standards with and without 

sulfur control. Thus, any additional information that 

Caterpillar could supply on this issue would be very helpful. 
P.3 

Thank you again for providing your perspective on the 

importance of reducing sulfur levels in diesel fuel. I assure 

you your comments will receive careful consideration in our 

deliberation on this issue. 

Sincerely, 

J. Craig Potter 

Assistant Administrator 

for Air and Radiation
ERRATA SHEET TO ANNUAL REPORT

OF MAINE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR 2002

In the interview with J. Nick Bayne, President and CEO of Maine Public
Service Company, beginning on page 14 of the Annual Report, in the answer to the
question:

"What percentage shareholder vote will be required to approve the holding
company?"

please substitute the following for the first sentence:

"Moving to a holding company requires stringent review and approval by the
Maine Public Utilities Commission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and
others before the vote can be presented to our shareholders."

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED UNDER THE
PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS WHICH ACCOMPANIES THIS ANNUAL REPORT, OR
DETERMINED IF SUCH PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE OR ADEQUATE. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
132 STAT. 3162 PUBLIC LAW 115–249—SEPT. 28, 2018 

Public Law 115–249 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the protection of community 

centers with religious affiliation, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Religiously Affiliated 

Institutions Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS WITH RELIGIOUS 

AFFILIATION. 

Section 247 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after ‘‘threat of force,’’ 

the following: ‘‘including by threat of force against religious 

real property,’’; 

(2) in subsection (d)— 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting 

‘‘or (c)’’ after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; 

(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); 

and 

(D) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: 

‘‘(4) if damage to or destruction of property results from 

the acts committed in violation of this section, which damage 

to or destruction of such property is in an amount that exceeds 

$5,000, a fine in accordance with this title, imprisonment for 

not more than 3 years, or both; and’’; and 

Protecting 

Religiously 

Affiliated 

Institutions Act 

of 2018. 

18 USC 1 note. 

Sept. 28, 2018 

[S. 994] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–249—SEPT. 28, 2018 132 STAT. 3163 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 994 (H.R. 1730): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–456 (Comm. on the Judiciary) accompanying H.R. 1730. 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–325 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Sept. 4, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 7, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(3) in subsection (f), by inserting before the period at the 

end the following: ‘‘, or real property owned or leased by a 

nonprofit, religiously affiliated organization’’. 

Approved September 28, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
Specimen of Stock Certificate evidencing shares of C Preferred Stock



 Exhibit 4.4 

	
	





  

Exhibit 4.4 
 See Legends on Reverse 
 Incorporated Under the
Laws of the State of Delaware 
 KALOBIOS PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC. 
 This Certifies that <<Stockholder>> is the registered holder of
<<SharesText>> (<<SharesNo>>) Shares of Series C Preferred Stock transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

 In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
officers this <<Day>> day of <<Month>> A.D. <<YEAR>>. 
 PREFERRED

 Secretary or Assistant Secretary 
 President or Vice President 







 



 
  
 THE SHARES
REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED, OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION THEREOF UNDER SUCH ACT OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, SATISFACTORY TO THE
COMPANY AND ITS COUNSEL, THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED. 
 For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated 20

 In presence of 
 NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.
§ 528.2 Definition of terms. As used in the regulations contained in this part, the term: ( a ) *Withdrawal* shall mean termination of validity of a certificate with prospective effect from the time of the action of withdrawal.
( b ) *Annulment* shall mean withdrawal of a certificate with retroactive effect to the date of issuance.
( c ) *Authorized representative* shall mean: ( 1 ) The Assistant Regional Administrators for the Wage and Hour Division (who are authorized to redelegate this authority) within their respective regions, and
( 2 ) the Caribbean Director of the Wage and Hour Division for the area covered by the Caribbean office.
( d ) *Area director* shall include any area director of the Wage and Hour Division.
(Secretary's Order No. 16-75, dated Nov. 25, 1975 (40 FR 55913). Employment Standards Order No. 76-2, dated Feb. 23, 1976 (41 FR 9016))
[43 FR 28469, June 30, 1978]
EXHIBIT 21



GENCOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



All of the operating subsidiaries of Gencor Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, listed below are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements:



|                                    |  |                            |  |                             
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                                    |  | State in WhichIncorporated |  | Country in WhichIncorporated
|General Combustion Corporation      |  | Florida                    |  |                             
|                                    |  |                           
|General Combustion Limited          |  |                            |  | England                     
|                                    |  |                           
|Bituma-Stor, Inc.                   |  | Iowa                       |  |                             
|                                    |  |                           
|Bituma Corporation                  |  | Washington                 |  |                             
|                                    |  |                           
|Equipment Services Group, Inc.      |  | Florida                    |  |                             
|                                    |  |                           
|CPM Brazil, Inc.                    |  | Florida                    |  |                             
|                                    |  |                           
|CPM do Brasil Ltda.                 |  |                            |  | Brazil                      
|                                    |  |                           
|Gumaco Industria E Comercio Ltda.   |  |                            |  | Brazil                      
|                                    |  |                           
|Gumaco Projectos E. Montagens Ltda. |  |                            |  | Brazil                      
|                                    |  |                           
|CPM Industria E Comercio Ltda.      |  |                            |  | Brazil                      
|                                    |  |                           
|Gencor International Limited        |  |                            |  | British Virgin Islands      



49
#### § 779.420 Recordkeeping requirements.

The records which must be kept with respect to employees for whom the overtime pay exemption under section 7(i) is taken are specified in § 516.16 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32

Certifications
Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Robert E. Switz
and Gokul V. Hemmady, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of  ADC Telecommunications, Inc., hereby certify that:

|1. |  | The annual report on form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. for the year
ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of sections
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ADC
Telecommunications, Inc.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Robert E. SwitzRobert E. SwitzJanuary 14, 2005
| | --------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Gokul V. HemmadyGokul V. HemmadyJanuary 14, 2005
| | ----------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 12.2  Madison Gas and Electric Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 (In thousands)   EarningsNet income before minority interest$49,752Equity earnings(8,157)Income distribution from equity investees6,285Minority interest in pre-tax income(10,540)Amortization of capitalized interest102Interest capitalized(3,351)Federal and state income taxes27,311Fixed charges23,480Total Earnings as Defined$84,882Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$15,834Interest on rentals*3,554Amortization of debt issuance costs547AFUDC - borrowed funds194Capitalized interest3,351Total Fixed Charges$23,480Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges3.62x  *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
How many asIAn longhorned beetles can you spot?
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

PLACE 

STAMP 

HERE

APHIS 81-35-019

Issued October 2013

Dead or fallen 

branches

Dime-sized 

exit holes

Answer: There are four Asian longhorned beetles on the front.

Shallow scars 

in bark 

Sawdust-like 

material

Actual size

Take 10 minutes and check your 

trees for signs of the Asian longhorned 

beetle. Report any sightings.

F I ND IT . REPORT IT . SAVE TREES.

ASIANLONGHORNEDBEETLE.com

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MICHAEL E. ROBICHAUD, JR.

(AC 18679)

Lavery, Landau and Hennessy, Js.

Argued December 14, 1999

officially released January 18, 2000

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 
Washington, DC 20549.
    Extension: Rule 17f-2(a); SEC File No. 270-34; OMB Control No. 
3235-0034.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
<bullet> Rule 17f-2(a) Fingerprinting Requirements for Securities 
Professionals
    Rule 17f-2(a) requires that securities professionals be 
fingerprinted. This requirement serves to identify security risk 
personnel, to allow an employer to make fully informed employment 
decisions, and to deter possible wrongdoers from seeking employment in 
the securities industry. Partners, directors, officers, and employees 
of exchanges, broker, dealers, transfer agents, and clearing agencies 
are included.
    It is estimated that approximately 10,000 respondents will submit 
fingerprint cards. It is also estimated that each respondent will 
submit 55 fingerprint cards. The staff estimates that the average 
number of hours necessary to comply with the Rule 17f-2(a) is one-half 
hour. The total burden is 275,000 hours for respondents, based upon 
past submissions. The average cost per hour is approximately $50. 
Therefore, the total cost of compliance for respondents is $13,750,000.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utlity; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimates for 
the curden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondends, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in 
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Michael E. Barrett, 
Associated Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Secretary and Exchange Commission. 450 5th Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20549.

    Dated: May 23, 2000.
Margarett H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13528 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Meeting with Textile Rental Services Association of America (TRSA) December 17, 2009

EPA staff met with representatives from TRSA at EPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) in Potomac Yards, Arlingt on, VA. Attending for ORCR were Charlotte Mooney and Robert Kayser. Attendees from TR SA included John Wittenborn, Charles Sewell, Eric Waeckerlin. and Gary Haulmark. TRSA asked for the meeting to discuss the Notice of Data Availability (NODA) published in the Federal Register on October 27, 2009 concerning the updated risk analysis related to the proposed rule on management of Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes (November 20, 2003; 68 FR 65586).

TRSA discussed the possible use of analytical data for laundry sludge (TCLP) in the risk analysis. TRSA stated that they were atte mpting to collect and submit data from TRSA members, which would include analytical data for solvent levels in the sl udge. TRSA also noted

that more recent information in dicates that current use of the hazardous waste solvents has

decreased and that towel laundri es have decreased water usage. TRSA also suggested that landfills used by laundries for sludge disposal are lik ely to be lined, and that they were willing to work with their members to encourage disposal of the sludge to landfill units with liners.

EPA staff welcomed comments in response to the Notice of Data Availability and stated that EPA would consider any information submitted by TRSA related to the risk analysis as we make

decisions on how to move forward with the risk analysis and the final rule.
#### Mae M. Cope, Respondent, *v.*John Wanamaker of New York, Appellant.

Argued May 27,1937;

decided June 11, 1937.

*David Cohen*for appellant.

*Benjamin Barondess, I, William Beisman*and *Philip B. Geldzahler*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

. Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
§ 93.205 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 93.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, *professional and technical services* shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( c ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( d ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found in the Company's Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              12,873
<SECURITIES>                     1,158,366
<RECEIVABLES>                       67,498
<ALLOWANCES>                        22,999
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 1,238,737
<PP&E>                             535,283
<DEPRECIATION>                     117,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2,849,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              680,387
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                         5,753,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2,849,074
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,328,387
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    4,942,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 1,767,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  21,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,767,310)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,525,313)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.33)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Anonymous.

Submitted August 12, 1996;

decided September 19, 1996

Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.