alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|DEAN HELLER
Secretary of State

204 North Carson Street, Suite 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(775) 684-5708
Website: secretaryofstate.biz | FILED# C 1326-93
APRIL 20, 2004
IN THE OFFICE OF
/S/ DEAN HELLER
DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Certificate of Amendment
(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)
|------------------------------------------------------------





Important: Read attached Instructions before completing form.

ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY.



Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

For Nevada Profit Corporations



(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 AND 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)



1.  Name of corporation:

China Energy Ventures Corp.



2.  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):



Article 4:



Capital Stock:



The capitalization of the corporation is $150,000.00 consisting of 150,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.



3.  The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted in favour of the amendment is: 20,354,379



4.  Effective date of filing (optional):

_______________

(must not be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)



5.  Officer Signature (required):

/s/ Matthew Heysel



*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.



IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.







|This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.  See attached fee schedule. | Nevada Secretary of State AM 78.385 Amend 2003
Revised on: 11/03/03
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------
# Jornal Oficial C 198/5 de

| | ISSN 1725-2482 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 198 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 47.o ano5 de Agosto de 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2482

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 198

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

47.o ano5 de Agosto de 2004

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Comunicações |
| | Comissão |
| 2004/C 198/1 | Taxas de câmbio do euro | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

I   Comunicações

Comissão

2004/C 198/1

Taxas de câmbio do euro

1

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

I Comunicações

Comissão

| 5.8.2004 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

C 198/1

---

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

4 de Agosto de 2004

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euro=

| | Moeda | Taxas de câmbio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dólar americano | 1,1983 |
| JPY | iene | 133,72 |
| DKK | coroa dinamarquesa | 7,4352 |
| GBP | libra esterlina | 0,65960 |
| SEK | coroa sueca | 9,1938 |
| CHF | franco suíço | 1,5394 |
| ISK | coroa islandesa | 86,33 |
| NOK | coroa norueguesa | 8,4145 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | libra cipriota | 0,57940 |
| CZK | coroa checa | 31,769 |
| EEK | coroa estoniana | 15,6466 |
| HUF | forint | 250,14 |
| LTL | litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | lats | 0,6527 |
| MTL | lira maltesa | 0,4245 |
| PLN | zloti | 4,4350 |
| ROL | leu | 40 954 |
| SIT | tolar | 240,0100 |
| SKK | coroa eslovaca | 40,120 |
| TRL | lira turca | 1 782 400 |
| AUD | dólar australiano | 1,7079 |
| CAD | dólar canadiano | 1,5844 |
| HKD | dólar de Hong Kong | 9,3465 |
| NZD | dólar neozelandês | 1,8624 |
| SGD | dólar de Singapura | 2,0667 |
| KRW | won sul-coreano | 1 399,08 |
| ZAR | rand | 7,5483 |

Moeda

Taxas de câmbio

USD

dólar americano

1,1983

JPY

iene

133,72

DKK

coroa dinamarquesa

7,4352

GBP

libra esterlina

0,65960

SEK

coroa sueca

9,1938

CHF

franco suíço

1,5394

ISK

coroa islandesa

86,33

NOK

coroa norueguesa

8,4145

BGN

lev

1,9558

CYP

libra cipriota

0,57940

CZK

coroa checa

31,769

EEK

coroa estoniana

15,6466

HUF

forint

250,14

LTL

litas

3,4528

LVL

lats

0,6527

MTL

lira maltesa

0,4245

PLN

zloti

4,4350

ROL

leu

40 954

SIT

tolar

240,0100

SKK

coroa eslovaca

40,120

TRL

lira turca

1 782 400

AUD

dólar australiano

1,7079

CAD

dólar canadiano

1,5844

HKD

dólar de Hong Kong

9,3465

NZD

dólar neozelandês

1,8624

SGD

dólar de Singapura

2,0667

KRW

won sul-coreano

1 399,08

ZAR

rand

7,5483

---

(1)

Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

---
#### § 779.13 Production.

To understand the meaning of “production” of goods for commerce as used in the Act it is necessary to refer to the definition in section 3(j) of the term “produced.” A detailed discussion of the application of the term as defined is contained in the interpretative bulletin on general coverage of the Act, part 776 of this chapter. Section 3(j) provides that “produced” as used in the Act “means produced, manufactured, mined, handled, or in any other manner worked on in any State; and for the purposes of this Act an employee shall be deemed to have been engaged in the production of goods if such employee was employed in producing, manufacturing, mining, handling, transporting, or in any other manner working on such goods, or in any closely related process or occupation directly essential to the production thereof, in any State.” (For the definition of “State,” see § 779.16.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.144 Contract modifications affecting amount.

Where a contract that was originally issued in an amount not in excess of $2,500 is later modified so that its amount may exceed that figure, all the provisions of section 2(a) of the Act, and the regulations thereunder, are applicable from the date of modification to the date of contract completion. In the event of such modification, the contracting officer shall immediately obtain a wage determination from the Department of Labor using the e98 application or directly from WDOL, and insert the required contract clauses and any wage determination issued into the contract. In the event that a contract for services subject to the Act in excess of $2,500 is modified so that it cannot exceed $2,500, compliance with the provisions of section 2(a) of the Act and the contract clauses required thereunder ceases to be an obligation of the contractor when such modification becomes effective.

[70 FR 50899, Aug. 26, 2005]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: May 19, 2000.
    Time: 2 pm to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 350, Rockville, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Andrew P. Mariani, Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, 6120 Executive Blvd., Suite 350, Rockville, MD 20892, 301/
496-5561.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13283 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit (32)(b)

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, John M. Presley, Chief Financial Officer of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 1, 2006.



/s/ John M. PresleyJohn M. Presley Chief Financial Officer Marshall & Ilsley Corporation






This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
§ 501.9 Enforcement of surety bond. Every H-2A labor contractor (H-2ALC) must obtain a surety bond demonstrating its ability to discharge financial obligations as set forth in 20 CFR 655.132(c). ( a ) Notwithstanding the required bond amounts set forth in 20 CFR 655.132(c), the WHD Administrator may require that an H-2ALC obtain a bond with a higher face value amount after notice and opportunity for hearing when it is shown based on objective criteria that the amount of the bond is insufficient to meet potential liabilities.
( b ) Upon a final decision reached pursuant to the administrative proceedings of subpart C of this part, including any timely appeal, or resulting from an enforcement action brought directly in a District Court of the United States finding a violation or violations of 20 CFR part 655, subpart B, or this part, the WHD Administrator may make a written demand on the surety for payment of any wages and benefits, including the assessment of interest, owed to an H-2A worker, a worker engaged in corresponding employment, or a U.S. worker improperly rejected or improperly laid off or displaced. The WHD Administrator shall have 3 years from the expiration of the labor certification, including any extension thereof, to make such written demand for payment on the surety. This 3-year period for making a demand on the surety is tolled by commencement of any enforcement action of the WHD Administrator pursuant to § 501.6, § 501.15, or § 501.16 or the commencement of any enforcement action in a District Court of the United States.
§ 105.410 Submission and approval. ( a ) The owner or operator of each facility currently in operation must either: ( 1 ) Submit one copy of their Facility Security Plan (FSP) for review and approval to the cognizant COTP and a letter certifying that the FSP meets applicable requirements of this part; or
( 2 ) If intending to operate under an Approved Alternative Security Program, a letter signed by the facility owner or operator stating which approved Alternative Security Program the owner or operator intends to use.
( b ) Owners or operators of facilities not in service on or before December 31, 2003, must comply with the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section 60 days prior to beginning operations.
( c ) The cognizant COTP will examine each submission for compliance with this part and either: ( 1 ) Approve it and specify any conditions of approval, returning to the submitter a letter stating its acceptance and any conditions;
( 2 ) Return it for revision, returning a copy to the submitter with brief descriptions of the required revisions; or
( 3 ) Disapprove it, returning a copy to the submitter with a brief statement of the reasons for disapproval.
( d ) An FSP may be submitted and approved to cover more than one facility where they share similarities in design and operations, if authorized and approved by each cognizant COTP.
( e ) Each facility owner or operator that submits one FSP to cover two or more facilities of similar design and operation must address facility-specific information that includes the design and operational characteristics of each facility and must complete a separate Facility Vulnerability and Security Measures Summary (Form CG-6025), for each facility covered by the plan. The form is available at *https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/forms/ .*
( f ) A FSP that is approved by the cognizant COTP is valid for five years from the date of its approval.
[USCG-2003-14732, 68 FR 39322, July 1, 2003; 68 FR 41916, July 16, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 60542, Oct. 22, 2003; USCG-2004-19963, 70 FR 74669, Dec. 16, 2005; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39173, July 1, 2013; USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58278, Sept. 18, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Section 906 Certification
 
  
 The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the MLM Index TM
Fund.
 
 August 12, 2009
 
 
 By: /s/ Timothy J. RudderowTimothy J. RudderowPresidentMount Lucas Management Corporation,the manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
Order entered March 2 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00428
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF D.F.D. AND T.Z.D., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District C ourt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 18
- 19199

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 26, 2021 “Affidavit of Fact Declaration of Truth.” In the document, appellant states that the Court is required to provide a “written rebuttal to me, in kind, specific to each and every point of the subject matter stated herein, within 15 days, via your own sworn and notarized affidavit, using fact, valid law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific subject matter stating in this Affida vit/Declaration.” We construe the document as
a motion . We DENY the motion.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Submitted on record and petitioners’ brief December 10,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 30, 1992

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert W. Sterling, Claimant. PACIFIC SEAFOOD and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Petitioners, v.*Robert W. STERLING, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-07003; CA A75394)

842 P2d 818

Alexander D. Libmann, Trial Counsel, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Portland, filed the brief for petitioners.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, *rev den*315 Or 271 (1992).
(79 South. 197)

#### Ex parte MOONEYHAM.

(6 Div. 460.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 14, 1918.)

Appeal and Error <&wkey;361 (2) — Statement for Appeal.

Appeal of one applying for prohibition will be dismissed, there being nothing other than an order granting respondent’s motion for new trial after writ was granted that will support appeal, and appellant’s statement for appeal being that he appeals from judgment denying writ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; O. Kyle, Judge.

Petition by W. J. Mooneyham for writ of prohibition to the county court. After writ was directed to be issued, new trial was ordered, and petitioner appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

See, also, 15 Ala. App. 482, 73 South. 990.

J. P. Lockwood, of Cullman, for appellant. A. A. Griffith and Paine Denson, both of Cullman, for appellee.

BROWN, P. J.

The record filed here shows that the trial court, on first consideration of the case as presented on the respondent’s demurrers to the petition .for the writ of prohibition, overruled the demurrers, and, the respondent declining to plead further, the prayer of the petition was granted, and a writ of prohibition directed to issue to the county *500court, restraining that court from proceeding-further with the trial' of the appellant.

On a subsequent day of the term, on hearing the respondent’s motion for new trial, the following order was entered:

> “On this 24th day of October, 1917, come 'the parties by attorneys, and thereupon, said motion being submitted to the court, and duly considered and understood by the court, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that said motion be- and is hereby granted, and the judgment heretofore rendered in this cause is hereby set aside, and held for naught, on authority of Alford v. State ex rel. Atty. General, 170 Ala. 179, 54 South. 213, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1093. It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that said W. J. Mooney-ham be and he hereby is taxed with the costs of this proceeding in this motion as well as in the original case, and that the defendant have and recover of the said W. J. Mooneykam the costs of this motion, as well as in the original case, for which let -execution issue.”

The statement and prayer for appeal is: “Relator, W. J. Mooneyham, appeals to the Court of Appeals of Alabama, from the judgment and order of the said circuit court, disallowing and denying the writ of prohibition, mandamus, etc., in his favor, and against Hon. Fred J. Buchmann, judge of the county court of Cullman county, Ala.; and he hereto attaches his bond herein for the costs of the said Court of Appeals.”

This statement is sufficient to show that the appeal here is not from, the order grant? ing the new trial, and there is no other order or judgment'shown by this record that will sustain the appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
[No. 27841-3-II.

Division Two.

December 31, 2002.]

#### Nancy Lynn McGregor, *Respondent,*v. Leslie F. Ackler, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thurston County, No. 01-2-30241-5, Gary Tabor, J., entered September 14, 2001. *Dismissed*by unpublished opinion per Quinn-Brintnall, J., concurred in by Hunt, C.J., and Armstrong, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Gary J. Wolter

Gary J. Wolter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 8, 2006
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Gallatin Valley, Gallatin County, Montana

By: O. M. HackettF. N. VisherR. G. McMurtreyW. L. SteinhilberFrank StermitzF. C. BonerR. A. Krieger

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1482

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.