alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Program Instructions

AOA-PI-99-02

TO : STATES ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT OF 1965, AS 

AMENDED

SUBJECT : Procedures for Issuing Title III Formula Grant Amendments for Transfer of Funds

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES : Older Americans Act, as Amended - Sections 308(b)(4)(A), 

308(b)(4)(B), 308(b)(5)(A), 308(b)(5)(B)(i) and (ii),308(b)(5)(C)

The purpose of this program instruction is to reiterate procedures for transferring of funds within the 

Title III allotments and for effecting these transfers by the Administration on Aging's (AoA) grant 

award amendments.

The Older Americans Act provides authority for states to make transfers of funds among allotments for 

Supportive Services and Senior Centers (III-B), Congregate Meals (III-C1), and Home-Delivered Meals 

(III-C2). There is, however, no authority for states to transfer funds in or out of the allotments for InHome Services for Frail Individuals, Disease Prevention, Ombudsman Program or the Elder Abuse 

Program.

States can make transfers, whenever necessary, throughout the fiscal year among the III-B, III-C1 

and III-C2 allotments. In order to keep the workload of transfers at a minimum, a policy was 

established for states to notify AoA only once a year for:

(1) transfers of up to 30 percent between III-C1 and III-C2, as provided in Section 308(b)(4)(A); and

(2) transfers of up to 20 percent between III-B, and III-C, as provided in Section 308(b)(5)(A).

Although these transfers may be made whenever necessary, they should be reflected on the Financial 

Status Report(SF-269),

Item 10.o (Total Cumulative Federal Funds Authorized) on the semiannual reports. The cumulative 

transfer of funds among allotments, however, will not be reflected on a revised grant award until after 

the reallotment (if there is one).

Transfers within III-C which exceed 30 percent of the state's separate allotment for III-B or III-C, 

require AoA's prior approval and should be reflected on the SF-269 after approval. Notification of your 

amount of transfers for this fiscal year, as well as your requests for a waiver must be received on or 

before August 27, 1999. State agencies will be notified by letter of AoA's approval or disapproval to 

transfer funds. All transfers for this fiscal year must be made before September 30, 1999. Any 

transfers reflected on the SF-269 after the close of the fiscal year must be supported by 
documentation which indicates that the transfers were approved or made prior to the close of the 

fiscal year.

Jeanette C. Takamura

Assistant Secretary for Aging

DUE DATE: August 27,1999 for submission to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS regional 

offices.

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS regional offices.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Occupational Progress of Women: An Interpretation of Census Statistics of Women in Gainful Occupations

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*The Occupational Progress of Women: An Interpretation of Census Statistics of Women in Gainful Occupations : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 27*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1922,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5350,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 106 (Thursday, June 1, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35104-35105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13716]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, Ledley SEP.
    Date: June 14-15, 2000.
    Time: June 14, 2000, 6:30 pm to 9:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, The Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Road NW, Wisconsin at Western Avenue, Washington, DC 20015.
    Time: June 15, 2000, 8:30 am to 5 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, The Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Road NW, Wisconsin at Western Avenue, Washington, DC 20015.

[[Page 35105]]

    Contact Person: Sharee Pepper, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Health Scientist Administrator, Office of Extramural 
Programs, National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive Suite 
301, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-4933.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 25, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13716 Filed 5-31-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.455 Houma Navigation Canal.

The draw of SR 661 (Houma Nav Canal) bridge, mile 36.0, at Houma, shall open on signal; except that, the draw need not open for the passage of vessels Monday through Friday except Federal holidays from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., from 11:45 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., from 12:45 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.

[CGD08-05-004, 70 FR 20469, Apr. 20, 2005]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM ANTHONY BULLOCK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-00-264, CA-01-1074-1) Submitted: November 12, 2002 Decided: December 2, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Anthony Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM William A. Bullock seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Bullock also moves this court to hear his appeal en banc under Fed. R. App. P. 35. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a proceeding under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion on the merits, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the appellant can make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Bullock h as not made the requisite showing. SeeUnited States v. Bullock , Nos. CR-00-264; CA-01-1074-1 (M.D.N.C. May 28, 2002). As no active member of the court has voted to grant hearing en banc, it is denied. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00149-CR 

No. 07-22-00150-CR 

 

RINO REY ACOSTA, APPELLANT 

V. 

STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 100th District Court 

 Childress County, Texas 

Trial Court Nos. 6606 & 6607, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding 

December 2, 2022 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Rino Rey Acosta, appeals from the trial court’s judgments adjudicating 

him guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation.1 The appellate record was originally 

due September 8, 2022. The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s 

record was not. We subsequently granted the reporter an extension to file the reporter’s 

record. By letter of October 11, 2022, we admonished the reporter that failure to file the 

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02.
2

reporter’s record by October 24 could result in the appeal being abated and the cause 

remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, the

reporter’s record has not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication 

with this Court.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring 

appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to 

preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, 

the trial court shall determine the following:

1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

2. why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;

3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of

those tasks; and

4. whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial

court finds reasonable.

Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days 

to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter 

to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January 

2, 2023.
3

Should the reporter file the reporter’s record on or before December 16, 2022, she 

is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial 

court shall not be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Quinn, C.J., not participating.
#### § 103.100 Applicability.

This part applies to all vessels and facilities located in, on, under, or adjacent to waters subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.
§ 110.148 Johnsons River at Bridgeport, Conn. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds.* In Johnsons River, beginning at a point “A” latitude 41°10′12.3′′, longitude 73°09′50.2′′; thence westerly to a point “B” latitude 41°10′12.3′′, longitude 73°09′52.1′′; thence southwesterly to point “C” latitude 41°10′10′′, longitude 73°09′54.9′′; thence south southwesterly to point “D” latitude 41°10′05′′, longitude 73°09′56.1′′; thence southeasterly to point “E” latitude 41°10′04′′, longitude 73°09′55.9′′; thence northeasterly to point “F” latitude 41°10′05′′, longitude 73°09′54.5′′; thence northerly to point “G” latitude 41°10′05.8′′, longitude 73°09′54.5′′; thence northeasterly to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* The anchorage is for use by commercial and pleasure craft. Temporary floats or buoys for marking anchors or moorings will be allowed. The anchoring of vessels and placing of temporary anchors or mooring piles are under the jurisdiction of the local harbor master. Fixed mooring piles or stakes will not be allowed.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 421 

Honoring the 150th anniversary of the American Printing House for the 

Blind. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. BUNNING) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 150th anniversary of the American Printing 

House for the Blind. 

Whereas the American Printing House for the Blind was 

chartered in 1858 in Louisville, Kentucky by the General 

Assembly of Kentucky through An Act to Establish the 

American Printing House for the Blind, in response to a 

growing national need for books and educational aids for 

blind students; 

Whereas Louisville, Kentucky was chosen as the best city in 

which to establish a national publishing house to print 

books in raised letters due to its central location in the 

country in 1858 and its efficient distribution system; 

Whereas the 45th Congress passed an Act to promote the 

education of the blind in 1879 designating the American 

Printing House for the Blind as the official national 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 421 ATS 

source of textbooks and educational aids for legally blind 

students below college level throughout the country, and 

Congress appropriates Federal funds to the American 

Printing House for the Blind annually for this purpose; 

Whereas, for 150 years, the American Printing House for the 

Blind has identified the unique needs of people who are 

blind and visually impaired and has developed, produced, 

and distributed educational materials in Braille, large 

print, and enlarged print throughout the United States; 

Whereas the American Printing House for the Blind serves 

more than 58,000 blind and visually impaired Americans 

each year; and 

Whereas the American Printing House for the Blind each 

year attracts visitors from across the country and around 

the world to learn about the history of the education of 

the blind and to exchange information on the evolving 

needs of the population it serves: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors the 150th anniversary of the estab3 lishment of the American Printing House for the 

4 Blind in Louisville, Kentucky, and 

5 (2) recognizes the important role the American 

6 Printing House for the Blind has played in the edu7 cation of blind and visually impaired students 

8 throughout the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33887-33888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13167]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Public 
Law 103-446, and Public Law 92-463, (Committee) will be held from 
Monday, June 5, 2000 to Wednesday, June 7, 2000, in Washington, DC. The 
purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
on the administration of VA benefits and services to minority veterans; 
to assess the needs of minority veterans and to evaluate whether VA 
compensation, medical and rehabilitation services, outreach, and other 
programs are meeting those needs. The Committee will make 
recommendations to the Secretary regarding such activities.
    The meeting will convene to room 830, VA Central Office Building, 
810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 
each day. On June 5, the Committee will focus on such health care 
issues as minority health--a global assessment, medical research, Board 
of Veterans Appeals (BVA) operations, and Minority and Veterans 
Business contacting. On Tuesday, June 6, the Committee will concentrate 
its effort on a report of a Veterans Identity Study, Hepatitis C 
infections, the cardiac care program evaluation, the Veterans' Benefits 
Administration's Road Map to Excellence and National Cemetery 
operations. The Committee will work in Subcommittees in the afternoon 
session. On Wednesday, June 7, the Committee will examine several 
diversity training programs and will begin drafting its annual report 
for Fiscal Year 2000.
    These sessions will be open to the public. In order to notify the 
VA Security Office of the number of visitors to expect, those wishing 
to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Anthony T.

[[Page 33888]]

Hawkins, Department of Veterans Affairs, at (202) 273-6708, before June 
1, 2000. No time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations 
from the public. However, the Committee will accept written comments 
from interested parties on issues affecting minority veterans. Such 
comments should be referred to the Committee at the following address: 
Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans, Center for Minority Veterans 
(00M), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: May 16, 2000.

By Direction of the Secretary.
Marvin R. Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
FR Doc. 00-13167 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Harvest for this publication is found in ~/gpo116552
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

We , Danong Chen, Chief Executive Officer of Tanox, Inc. and Gregory P. Guidroz, Vice President of
Finance of Tanox, Inc. certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tanox, Inc. for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tanox, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 1,
2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Danong Chen                      
|                    |  |     |  | Danong Chen                          
|                    |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |    
|Date: March 1,
2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gregory P. Guidroz               
|                    |  |     |  | Gregory P. Guidroz                   
|                    |  |     |  | Vice President of Finance            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Tanox, Inc. and will be retained by Tanox, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.2


                     ADDENDUM TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

The following addendum made this 8 day of January, 2002 by and between
Internet Cable Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("ICBL") with offices Located
at 195 Rivera Drive, Unit 2, Markham, Ontario L3R 5J6 Canada, and Timothy Karnes
("Karnes") residing at 1205 Waterfront Drive, Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 sets forth
a binding modification of the agreement by and between the parties hereto,
entered to on October 29, 2001, subject to the terms and conditions as contained
herein.

WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
which settles various issues between them, and

WHEREAS, ICBL and Karnes wish to modify the terms of such Memorandum of
Understanding.

NOW THEREFORE to parties hereto agree to the following changes:

          l)   Karnes obligation to deliver shares of ICBL's common stock in
               escrow shall be reduced to 225,000 from 240,000.

          2)   ICBL obligation to deliver 116,000 shares and or options to
               Karnes as and for settlement of any obligations due to the
               termination and any amounts due under an employment contract
               between the parties, shall be reduced to 100,000 shares and or
               options as the parties hereto agree.

          3)   All other terms of the Memorandum of Understanding by and between
               Karnes and ICBL shall remain in full force and effect and are
               incorporated by reference herein.

          4)   This Memorandum may be executed by one or more of the parties
               hereto in any number or separate counterparts, each of which when
               so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all or which
               taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same
               instrument.

          5)   This agreement may be executed by facsimile, which shall be
               deemed to constitute an original signature.

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereto execute tins Addendum with the intent that
they be legally and equitably bound by its terms.

Signed:/s/Joseph Melanson                   Signed:/s/Timothy Karnes
       -------------------------                   -----------------------------
                                                   Timothy Karnes

Internet Cable Corporation
By: Joseph Melanson CEO

Date: 5/15/02                               Date: 1/8/02
       -------------------------                  ------------------------------