alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.19


 


Loan Contract


 


Through amiable and fully
negotiation, Sanhe City Lucksky Electrical Engineering Limited Company (hereafter referred to as the Borrower) and Lucksky Kelitai
Air Power Machinery Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the Lender) come into the following Contract to perform:


 


Art. 1. On July
18, 2013, the Lender lent RMB Seven Million Seven Hundred and Twenty Two Thousand Only (in words) (¥7,722,000)
to the Borrower for purchasing equipment. The repayment deadline is December 31, 2014.


 


Art. 2. The Lender
shall lend money to the Borrower strictly in accordance with the national credit policies and plans. Otherwise, the Lender shall
pay the Borrower penalty by day based on the default amount. The calculation of default amount will be the same as that of interest
amount for overdue loan.


 


Art.3. The Borrower
is willing to abide by relevant loan regulations of the Lender and use the loan for the Contract regulated purpose. Otherwise,
the Lender will take back the already lent money immediately or earlier than schedule.


 


Art. 4. The Borrower
shall guarantee to repay the loan principal in time. If delay is inevitable, the Borrower shall provide written application before
loan maturity. Only after the Lender agrees its delay application and signs the delay repayment agreement, can the Borrower delay
the repayment. In case the Borrower doesn’t provide delay application or both parties don’t come into a delay agreement,
the Lender will require the Borrower paying another 0.1% of the default amount as interest from the maturity time.


 


Art. 5. In case
of any disputes, both parties shall negotiate with each for solution. If the negotiation fails, the second way shall be taken for
solution:


 


1. Apply to the Sanhe Arbitration
Committee for arbitration;


 


2. Apply to the People’s
Court for prosecution.


 


Art. 6. This Contract
will come into effect from the signing date.


 


This Contract is in duplication
with each party holding one copy.


 





	
        Lender (official seal):

         

         

        Legal Representative:

         

         

         

        Borrower (official seal):

         

         

        Legal Representative:

         

         

        Date: July 18, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-239-001]

Take notice that on May 11, 2000 Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC (Pine Needle) tendered for filing information fully supporting the increase in its electric power cost rate. Pine Needle asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's letter order dated April 26, 2000, in Docket No. RP00-239-000.

Any person desiring to protest this filling should file a protest with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. all such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://ww.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-12864 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[EXHIBIT 23a TO COLONIAL GAS COMPANY
             10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 21, 1997]

                                                      EXHIBIT 23a

       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                
                                
     We have issued our reports dated January 14, 1998 accompanying

the consolidated financial statements and schedule incorporated by

reference or included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial

Gas Company and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1997.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports

in the Colonial Gas Company Registration Statements on Forms S-8, as

amended (File No. 33-47099, File No. 33-54091, and File No. 33-

34067); on Forms S-3 (File No. 33-61863 and File No. 333-43715); and

on Form S-4 (File No. 333-47441).



                                   GRANT THORNTON LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 12, 1998


           [END OF EXHIBIT 23a TO COLONIAL GAS COMPANY
             10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 21, 1997]
Exhibit 10.2.2


 


PAXMED INC.


420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 300


New York, New York 10170


 


	 	April 8, 2015


 


Dr. Lishan Aklog


10 Hickory Pine Court


Purchase, NY 10577


 


Dear Dr. Aklog:


 


This letter will serve to amend the Employment
Agreement (“Employment Agreement”), dated as of October 24, 2014, between you and PAXmed Inc.


 


Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended and restated to read as follows:


 


“3.1 Salary. The Company shall
pay to Executive a salary (“Base Salary”) at the annual rate of $240,000. Executive’s compensation shall be paid
in equal, periodic installments in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll procedures; provide however, that Executive’s
Base Salary shall be paid only upon, and be subject to, the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering of its
securities.”


 


Except as amended herein, all other provisions
of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Please sign this letter in the place below to
confirm your agreement.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	PAXMED INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Richard Salute
	 	 	Name: Richard Salute
	 	 	Title:    CFO


 


	AGREED TO:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Lishan Aklog	 
	Lishan Aklog
#### § 541.5 Severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable and operate independently from one another. If any provision of this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, or stayed pending further agency action, the provision must be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, unless such holding be one of utter invalidity or unenforceability, in which event the provision will be severable from part 541 and will not affect the remainder thereof.

[89 32971, Apr. 26, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pick Ups Plus, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Merritt
Jesson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  November 18, 2004


                                       --------------------------------
                                          Merritt Jesson
                                          hief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 12, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 12, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0004. GREENTREE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC v. BEAMER RENTALS, INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 13CV62817
(81 South. 185)

#### BACHELOR v. STATE.

(5 Div. 297.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 14, 1919.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;280(3) — Plea — Another Prosecution Pending.

A plea that the indictment should not be prosecuted because prior to its finding a criminal prosecution against defendant for the same offense was begun in county court, without his agency, request, etc., and is still pending, complies with Code 1907, § 7571, as to the requisites of such a plea, and it was error, to strike such plea, in view of section 7570.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Elmore County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Edgar Bachelor was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

The following is the plea referred to;

The defendant says the state ought not to further prosecute this indictment against him, because before the finding of said indictment a criminal prosecution against him for the identical offense charged in said indictment was begun in the county court of Elmore county, and said prosecution is still pending. Defendant avers that said prosecution in said county court was commenced without the agency, request, participation, connivance, or authority of the defendant, all of which the defendant is ready to verify.

George F. Smoot, of Wetumpka, for appellant.

Emmett S. Thigpen, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The defendant’s plea, setting up the pendency of a prosecution in the county court instituted, before the commencement of this prosecution, is in proper form, and embodies all the averments required by the statute (Code 1907, § 7571), and the court committed reversible error in striking the plea from the files on the motion of the solicitor. Code 1907, § 7570; Sherrod v. State, 14 Ala. App. 57, 71 South. 76; Gustin v. State, 10 Ala. App. 171, 65 South. 302; Moore v. State, 71 Ala. 307.

Reversed and remanded.
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

OVTlOJG SYMBOL 

## 110"'-14 mnAL5/5IG ~ 

# /. r:</"'y"hi ATE ' 

# J-27' -10

fixed leading edge adjacent to the inboard end ofslats 4 and 7that are too close tothe h portion ofthe engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent fuel leaking onto an engine an immediately outbomd ofthe nacelles at slats 4 and 7. This AD results from reports of oo<l"gSyml><>' SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for all ModeJ 757 Ainvorthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (Ff.-A), DOT. ACTION: Final rule.

Model 757 airplanes in service that have drain holes and unsealed panel assemblies inth airplanes. This AD requires changing the lower fixed leading edge panel assemblies 14 CFR Part 39 INlTIAlSISIG ~ocl{ctNo. FAA-2010-0483j Directorate Identifier 201O-NM-065-ADj Amendmen 

# DJtl: . 1t-50:L -23-13 m

_ '3~**; AD 2010-J 

# ~~ho ROVT1NG SYMBOL R1N 2120-AA64

aconsequent fire. DATES: This AD iseffective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. The Director ofthe Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publication listed inthe AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF I 

## '" PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. OlfnNG SYMBOL

OVTlNG SYMBOL[4910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATlON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2010-0483; Directorate Identifier 2010MNM-065-AD; Amendmen

.39-*"; AD 2010-] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for all Model?5? airplanes. "Ibis AD requires changing the lower fixed leading edge panel assemblies immediately outboard ofthe nacelles at slats 4 and 7. This AD results from reports of 

### ft-01\1-i\l~ IrJmALSISIG 

# DR " DATE

# s~lJo OUTING $YM60l 

## I\0rn-14 IrilTIALSISIG ::,(l

## THk" 

# ".t.i ,~ 

## }-zy-/O

DATE Rou"o~ S~m""l 

### /W. Model 757 airplanes in service that have drain holes andunsealed panel assemblies in th mALSIS1G fixed leading edge adjacent to the inboard end ofslats 4 and 7that are too close to the hATE portion ofthe engines. We are issuing this AD toprevent fuel leaking onto an engine an aconsequent fire. DATES: This AD iseffective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. O<JTlNG sYMllOL ,, NmAt.$/SIG
DATE DUTlNCi SYM~Ol The Director ofthe Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of' NmAWS!G certain publication listed inthe AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
INmALS'SlG

OllllN'G SYMilOL 

### b",<,----
Exhibit 4.28


 





Supplementary Agreement to


The Amended and Restated Call Option
Agreement


 


This Supplementary Agreement (hereinafter,
the “Agreement”) is executed by the following Parties in Beijing on April 7, 2015.


 


Party A: AirMedia Technology (Bejing) Co.,
Ltd.


 


Party B: Beijing Shengshi Lianhe Advertising
Co., Ltd.


 


Party C: AirMedia Group Co., Ltd.


 


(All the above parities are hereinafter
referred collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”)


 


Whereas, 


(1) under the Amended and Restated
Call Option Agreement and its supplementary agreements (hereinafter, the “Original Agreement”) executed by Party
A, Party B, Party C and other shareholders of Party C, Party A has a call option to purchase from Party B all or a part of the
equity interest of Party C held by Party B. Except Party A and/or a designated person, Party B shall not sell the above equity
interest to any third party.


 


(2) for the development of business, Party
B proposes to transfer 5% of the equity interest of Party C to Shenzhen Liantronics Co., Ltd.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, through amicable
negotiations, Party A, Party B and Party C hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Party A agrees that Party B transfers 5% of the equity interest of Party C to Shenzhen Liantronics
Co., Ltd. (the “Equity Interest Transfer”). After the completion of the Equity Interest Transfer, the remaining
91.76% of the equity interest of Party C held by Party B shall remain subject to the Original Agreement.



		2.	Upon the effectiveness of this Agreement, in the case of any inconsistency between the Original
Agreement and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail among Party A, Party B and Party C. Other matters that are not covered
in this Agreement shall remain subject to the Original Purchase Agreement.



		3.	This Agreement is effective and binding upon the signatures or stamps of all Parties have been
signed or affixed. This Agreement is executed in three copies. Each party shall hold one copy. Each copy shall be equally binding.



 


[THE REMAINDER
OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


[Signature
Page]


 


 


Party A: AirMedia
Technology (Bejing) Co., Ltd. (sealed)


 


 


Party B: Beijing
Shengshi Lianhe Advertising Co., Ltd. (sealed)


 


 


Party C: AirMedia
Group Co., Ltd. (sealed)
§ 780.315 Local hand harvest laborers. ( a ) A requirement of the exemption is that an employee must commute each day from his permanent residence to the farm where he is employed. Thus, the exemption does not apply to a migrant worker who travels to different areas of the country during the harvesting seasons. This would be true even though the worker may remain in the area for a considerable period of time. On the other hand, if a migrant worker actually changes his place of residence and thereafter commutes daily from his permanent residence, the exemption applies from the date of the change of residence if the other tests are met.
( b ) The fact that a worker may live on the farm where the operations are performed would not be a reason for disqualification. For example, if the other tests for the exemption are met, members of a tractor driver's family who reside on the farm could be employed in picking cotton within the terms of the exemption. Such family members would be considered to be commuting daily from their permanent residence despite the fact that their residence may be located on the farm at which they are employed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Capital Solutions 1, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Capital
Solutions 1, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Christopher Astrom, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Capital Solutions 1, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 11, 2007

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
                                      -----------------------
                                      Christopher Astrom
                                      Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1
**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary J. WolterChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 14, 2005**
#### § 785.30 Independent training.

Of course, if an employee on his own initiative attends an independent school, college or independent trade school after hours, the time is not hours worked for his employer even if the courses are related to his job.
#### § 780.204 Number of employees engaged in operations not material.

The fact that the employer employs fewer than a certain number of employees in forestry and lumbering operations does not provide a basis for their being considered as agricultural employees. This is to be distinguished from the exemption provided by section 13(a)(13) (discussed in part 788 of this chapter) which is limited to employers employing not more than eight employees in the forestry or logging operations described therein.
#### § 778.322 Reducing the fixed workweek for which a salary is paid.

If an employee whose maximum hours standard is 40 hours was hired at a salary of $200 for a fixed workweek of 40 hours, his regular rate at the time of hiring was $5 per hour. If his workweek is later reduced to a fixed workweek of 35 hours while his salary remains the same, it is the fact that it now takes him only 35 hours to earn $200, so that he earns his salary at the average rate of $5.71 per hour. His regular rate thus becomes $5.71 per hour; it is no longer $5 an hour. Overtime pay is due under the Act only for hours worked in excess of 40, not 35, but if the understanding of the parties is that the salary of $200 now covers 35 hours of work and no more, the employee would be owed $5.71 per hour under his employment contract for each hour worked between 35 and 40. He would be owed not less than one and one-half times $5.71 ($8.57) per hour, under the statute, for each hour worked in excess of 40 in the workweek. In weeks in which no overtime is worked only the provisions of section 6 of the Act, requiring the payment of not less than the applicable minimum wage for each hour worked, apply so that the employee's right to receive $5.71 per hour is enforceable only under his contract. However, in overtime weeks the Administrator has the duty to insure the payment of at least one and one-half times the employee's regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 and this overtime compensation cannot be said to have been paid until all straight time compensation due the employee under the statute or his employment contract has been paid. Thus if the employee works 41 hours in a particular week, he is owed his salary for 35 hours—$200, 5 hours' pay at $5.71 per hour for the 5 hours between 35 and 40—$28.55, and 1 hour's pay at $8.57 for the 1 hour in excess of 40—$8.57, or a total of $237.12 for the week.

[46 FR 7316, Jan. 23, 1981]
#### § 783.46 Hours worked.

The provisions of section 6(b)(2) of the Act require that a seaman employed on an American vessel be paid wages equal to compensation at not less than the prescribed minimum wage rate for all of the hours the employee “was actually on duty (including periods aboard ship when the employee was on watch or was, at the direction of a superior officer, performing work or standing by, but not including off-duty periods which are provided pursuant to the employment agreement)”. The Act in this portion of section 6(b)(2) is reflecting concepts that are well established in the law, and existing precedents (in such cases as *Armour & Co.* v. *Wantock,* 323 U.S. 126; *Skidmore* v. *Swift & Co.,* 323 U.S. 134; *Steiner* v. *Mitchell,* 350 U.S. 247; *Mitchell* v. *King Packing Co.,* 350 U.S. 260; *Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co.* v. *Muscoda Local N. 123,* 321 U.S. 590; and *General Electric Co.* v. *Porter,* 208 F. 2d 805, certiorari denied, 347 U.S. 951, 975) would be applicable in determining what time constitutes hours worked. See also the general discussion of hours worked in part 785 of this chapter.