alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(dollars inthousands)

 
| ** **                          | ** ** | **Three Months Ended  March 31,** | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                          | ** ** | **2008**                                         | ** ** | **2007**                                   | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** |
| Earnings:                           |       |                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                          |       | $                                                | 23,316     |                                       | $          | 17,522 |   | $ | 85,303 |   | $ | 66,101 |   | $ | 63,912 |   | $ | 56,742 |   | $ | 45,874 |   |
| Fixed charges                       |       | 9,518                                            |       | 9,893                                      |       | 37,755 |   | 47,020 |   | 46,633 |   | 41,836 |   | 37,899 |   |
| Adjusted  earnings                  |       | $                                                | 32,834     |                                       | $          | 27,415 |   | $ | 123,058 |   | $ | 113,121 |   | $ | 110,545 |   | $ | 98,578 |   | $ | 83,773 |   |
|                                |       |                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                      |       |                                             |       |                                       |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                    |       | $                                                | 9,518      |                                       | $          | 9,893 |   | $ | 37,755 |   | $ | 47,020 |   | $ | 46,633 |   | $ | 41,836 |   | $ | 37,899 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges |       | 3.4x                                             |       | 2.8x                                       |       | 3.3x |   | 2.4x |   | 2.4x |   | 2.4x |   | 2.2x |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2684-000]


Palmco Power NY, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

January 20, 2011.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Palmco Power NY, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 9, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296f6c7b6a66474540474c7a5c5959465b5d694f4c5b4a074e465f">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-2096 Filed 1-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 788.14 Number employed in other than specified operations.

The exemption is available to an employer, however, even if he has a total of nine or more employees, if only eight of them or less are employed in the named operations. Thus, if such an employer employs only eight employees in the named operations and others in operations not named in the exemption, such as sawmill operations, the exemption is not defeated because of the fact that he employs more than eight employees altogether. It will not apply, however, to those engaged in the operations not named in the exemption.
#### RONEY HARRIS *v.*UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION/PRATT AND WHITNEY AIRCRAFT DIVISION ET AL.

(AC 19399)

Foti, Landau and Stoughton, Js.

Argued February 16

officially released March 14, 2000

Per Curiam.

The decision of the workers’ compensation review board is affirmed.
*(75*South. 818)

#### OAKS v. STATE.

(5 Div. 248.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 29, 1917.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1917.)

Bribery <&wkey;3% — Officer—Who Is.

Under Code 1907, § 6401, as to acceptance of bribes by an executive officer, an indictment will not lie against a town marshal, while acting for the municipality, for accepting a bribe as an executive officer of the state.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Russell County; A. H. Alston, Judge.

John T. Oaks was convicted of accepting a bribe as an executive officer of the state. Defendant appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Glenn & De Graffenried, of Seale, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The proof showed without dispute that the defendant was the town marshal of the municipality of Girard, Ala.; and it is contended for this reason the affirJ mative charge should have been given, as requested by the defendant. As authority for this contention, counsel for defendant have directed our attention to State ex rel. Wilkinson v. Lane, 181 Ala. 646, 62 South. 31.

If we were at liberty to decide this case in line with the views expressed by Anderson, C. J., in the case of Draper v. State ex rel., 175 Ala. 553, 57 South. 772, Ann. Cas. 1914D, 301, et seq. (with which a majority of the court did not agree), (1 Dillon on Municipal Corporations, § 98, Barnes v. District of Col., 91 U. S. 540, 23 L. Ed. 440, 36 Cyc. 852, People v. Curley, 5 Colo. 412, People v. Ashburner, 55 Cal. 517, and 28 Cyc. 497 d, and authorities there cited, together with the statement of Brickell, C. J., in the noted case of State ex rel. Winter v. Sayre, 118 Ala. 1, 24 South. 89, where the learned judge said, “Every public officer * * * deriving place and authority from the Constitution or laws, is an officer of this state,” coupled with the power given town marshals in section 6267 of the Code), our decision'might be different; but under the decisions of the Supreme Court in Wiley’s Case, 54 Ala. 226, Draper’s Case, supra, and State ex rel. Wilkinson v. Lane, supra, we are forced to hold that a town marshal, while acting for the municipality, is not a state officer, within the meaning of section 6401 of the Code.

It therefore follows that the court erred in refusing the general charge as requested by the defendant; and for this error the judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
www.IndependentAircraft.com ~ 5250 Highway 78 ~ Suite 750 ~ Sachse, TX 75048 ~ Phone 318-487-0879

Lirio Liu, ARM-1

Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking

Office of Rulemaking

800 Independence Avenue SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Docket No. FAA-2012-0514

Dear Ms. Liu,

I am writing on behalf of Independent Aircraft Inc. to request a reopening of the comment period

on the Petition for Exemption found in Docket No. FAA-2012-0514.

Petitioner is requesting an increase in aircraft weight which exceeds the maximum takeoff

weight set by regulation for LSA. Given the significant safety issues involved with increasing a 

weight limit, especially by such a large percentage of total weight, we believe that the comment 

period should be extended.

Thank you for your consideration of Independent Aircraft’s request for an extension of the 

comment period for an additional 90 days.

John C. Brown

318-487-0879

 JBrown@Independentaircraft.com

 www.IndependentAircraft.com
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.24 Radiotelephone installation identification. ( a ) The Coast Guard authorizes, and the District Commander may require the installation of a sign on drawbridges, on the upstream and downstream sides, indicating that the bridge is equipped with and operates a VHF radiotelephone in accordance with § 117.23.
( b ) The sign shall give notice of the radiotelephone and its calling and working channels— ( 1 ) In plain language; or
( 2 ) By a sign consisting of the outline of a telephone handset with the long axis placed horizontally and a vertical three-legged lightning slash superimposed over the handset. The slash shall be as long vertically as the handset is wide horizontally and normally not less than 27 inches and no more than 36 inches long. The preferred calling channel should be shown in the lower left quadrant and the preferred working channel should be shown in the lower right quadrant.
Note:
It is recommended that the radiotelephone sign be similar in design to the Service Signs established by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in U.S. Road Symbol Signs using Reflective Blue and Reflective White colors. Color and design information is available from the District Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the bridge is located.
[CGD 84-022, 51 FR 16308, May 2, 1986]
**Exhibit 32.2**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of

**HORIZON BANCORPORATION, INC.**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc., hereby certifies that:

| 1.     | Horizon Bancorporation, Inc’s Quarterly Report on   Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this   certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with   the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of   1934; and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of Horizon Bancorporation, Inc.                                                                                                                                       |

Kathleen M. Jepson Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 3, 2006

----
§ 110.50c Mumford Cove, Groton, Conn. ( a ) *Area No. 1.* Beginning at a point on the easterly shore of Mumford Cove at latitude 41°19′36′′, longitude 72°01′06′′; thence to latitude 41°19′30′′, longitude 72°01′04′′; thence to the shoreline at latitude 41°19′31′′, longitude 72°01′00′′; and thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
( b ) *Area No. 2.* Beginning at a point on the easterly shore of Mumford Cove at latitude 41°19′15′′, longitude 72°00′54′′; thence to latitude 41°19′14.5′′, longitude 72°00′59′′; thence to latitude 41°19′11′′, longitude 72°00′58′′; thence to latitude 41°19′10′′, longitude 72°00′54′′; thence to latitude 41°19′12.5′′, longitude 72°00′52′′; thence to latitude 41°19′14′′, longitude 72°00′55′′; and thence to the point of beginning.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by USCG-2019-0952, 88 FR 16187, Mar. 16, 2023]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Task Force on Merit Review, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# DATE AND TIME:

 Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 1 p.m., E.D.T.

# SUBJECT MATTER:

 Discussion of proposed revisions to the draft principles and review criteria.

# STATUS:

 Open.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. A room will be available for the public and NSF staff to listen-in on this teleconference meeting. All visitors must contact the Board Office at least                         *one day*                         prior to the meeting to arrange for a visitor's badge and obtain the room number. Call 703-292-7000 to request your badge, which will be ready for pick-up at the visitor's desk on the day of the meeting. All visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance to receive their visitor's badge on the day of the teleconference.                    

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​*) for information or schedule updates, or                         *contact:*                         Kim Silverman, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                         *Telephone:*                         (703) 292-7000.                    

Ann Ferrante,

Writer/Editor.

[FR Doc. 2011-20926 Filed 8-12-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.3   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company (the "Company"), for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. WolterGary J. Wolter
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 24, 2011
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-93768, 333-08886 and 333-109500) of Lydall, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Hartford, Connecticut 

March 12, 2009
§ 110.194b Mississippi Sound and Gulf of Mexico, near Petit Bois Island, Miss. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds* — ( 1 ) *Explosives Anchorage Area No. 1.* A circular area with a one-half mile radius with its center located at latitude 30°14′09′′, longitude 88°29′13′′, in the waters of Mississippi Sound north of the west end of Petit Bois Island.
( 2 ) *Explosives Anchorage Area No. 2.* A circular area with a three-fourths mile radius with its center located at latitude 30°11′12′′, longitude 88°30′07′′, in the waters of Gulf of Mexico south of the west end of Petit Bois Island.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The areas shall be used as temporary anchorages for vessels engaged in loading and unloading explosives at the Port of Pascagoula, Miss.
( 2 ) No vessel shall occupy the areas without obtaining a permit from the Captain of the Port.
#### § 785.29 Training directly related to employee's job.

The training is directly related to the employee's job if it is designed to make the employee handle his job more effectively as distinguished from training him for another job, or to a new or additional skill. For example, a stenographer who is given a course in stenography is engaged in an activity to make her a better stenographer. Time spent in such a course given by the employer or under his auspices is hours worked. However, if the stenographer takes a course in bookkeeping, it may not be directly related to her job. Thus, the time she spends voluntarily in taking such a bookkeeping course, outside of regular working hours, need not be counted as working time. Where a training course is instituted for the bona fide purpose of preparing for advancement through upgrading the employee to a higher skill, and is not intended to make the employee more efficient in his present job, the training is not considered directly related to the employee's job even though the course incidentally improves his skill in doing his regular work.

[30 FR 9912, Aug. 10, 1965]
§ 106.262 Security measures for newly-hired employees. ( a ) Newly-hired OCS facility employees may be granted entry to secure areas of the OCS facility for up to 30 consecutive calendar days prior to receiving their TWIC provided all of the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section are met, and provided that the new hire is accompanied by an individual with a TWIC while within the secure areas of the OCS facility. If TSA does not act upon a TWIC application within 30 days, the cognizant Coast Guard COTP may further extend access to secure areas for another 30 days. The Coast Guard will determine whether, in particular circumstances, certain practices meet the condition of a new hire being accompanied by another individual with a TWIC.
( b ) Newly-hired OCS facility employees may be granted the access provided for in paragraph (a) of this section if: ( 1 ) The new hire has applied for a TWIC in accordance with 49 CFR part 1572 by completing the full enrollment process, paying the user fee, and is not currently engaged in a waiver or appeal process. The OCS facility owner or operator or Facility Security Officer (FSO) must have th enew hire sign a statement affirming this, and must retain the signed statement until the new hire receives a TWIC;
( 2 ) The OCS facility owner or operator or the FSO enters the following information on the new hire into the Coast Guard's Homeport Web site (*https://homeport.uscg.mil*): ( i ) Full legal name, including middle name if one exists;
( ii ) Date of birth;
( iii ) Social security number (optional);
( iv ) Employer name and 24 hour contact information; and
( v ) Date of TWIC enrollment.
( 3 ) The new hire presents an identification credential that meets the requirements of § 101.515 of this subchapter;
( 4 ) There are no other circumstances that would cause reasonable suspicion regarding the new hire's ability to obtain a TWIC, and the OCS facility owner or operator or FSO have not been informed by the cognizant COTP that the individual poses a security threat; and
( 5 ) There would be an adverse impact to OCS facility operations if the new hire is not allowed access.
( c ) This section does not apply to any individual being hired as a Company Security Officer or FSO, or any individual being hired to perform OCS facility security duties.
( d ) The new hire may not begin working at the OCS facility under the provisions of this section until the owner, operator, or FSO receives notification, via Homeport or some other means, the new hire has passed an initial name check.
[USCG-2006-24196, 72 FR 3587, Jan. 25, 2007, as amended by USCG-2007-28915, 81 FR 57713, Aug. 23, 2016; USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10029, Feb. 16, 2023]
Submitted on record and briefs October 30,

reversed and remanded December 16, 1992

#### ROBERTO CONTRERAS, *Appellant, v.*Carl ZENON, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution, *Respondent.*

(92C-10753; CA A76482)

842 P2d 811

Garrett A. Richardson, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*252PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief. *Boone v. Wright,*314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992). We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 825.203 Scheduling of intermittent or reduced schedule leave.

Eligible employees may take FMLA leave on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis when medically necessary due to the serious health condition of a covered family member or the employee or the serious injury or illness of a covered servicemember. *See* § 825.202. Eligible employees may also take FMLA leave on an intermittent or reduced schedule basis when necessary because of a qualifying exigency. If an employee needs leave intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule for planned medical treatment, then the employee must make a reasonable effort to schedule the treatment so as not to disrupt unduly the employer's operations.