alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.20


 


Loan Contract


 


Through amiable and fully
negotiation, Sanhe City Lucksky Electrical Engineering Limited Company (hereafter referred to as the Borrower) and Lucksky (Holding)
Group Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as the Lender) come into the following Contract to perform:


 


Art. 1. On April
1, 2014, the Lender lent RMB Three Million Only (in words) (¥3,000,000)
to the Borrower for purchasing equipment. The repayment deadline is December 31, 2014.


 


Art. 2. The Lender
shall lend money to the Borrower strictly in accordance with the national credit policies and plans. Otherwise, the Lender shall
pay the Borrower penalty by day based on the default amount. The calculation of default amount will be the same as that of interest
amount for overdue loan.


 


Art.3. The Borrower
is willing to abide by relevant loan regulations of the Lender and use the loan for the Contract regulated purpose. Otherwise,
the Lender will take back the already lent money immediately or earlier than schedule.


 


Art. 4. The Borrower
shall guarantee to repay the loan principal in time. If delay is inevitable, the Borrower shall provide written application before
loan maturity. Only after the Lender agrees its delay application and signs the delay repayment agreement, can the Borrower delay
the repayment. In case the Borrower doesn’t provide delay application or both parties don’t come into a delay agreement,
the Lender will require the Borrower paying another 5% of the default amount as interest from the maturity time.


 


Art. 5. In case
of any disputes, both parties shall negotiate with each for solution. If the negotiation fails, the second way shall be taken for
solution:


 


1. Apply to the Sanhe Arbitration
Committee for arbitration;


 


2. Apply to the People’s
Court for prosecution.


 


Art. 6. This Contract
will come into effect from the signing date.


 


This Contract is in duplication
with each party holding one copy.


 


Lender (official seal):


 


Legal Representative:


 


Borrower (official seal):


 


Legal Representative:


 


Date: April 1, 2014
§ 520.412 What records, in addition to those required by Part 516 of this chapter and section 520.203 of this part, must I keep relating to the employment of messengers, learners, or apprentices under special certificate? ( a ) Each worker employed as a messenger, learner, or apprentice under a certificate shall be designated as such on the employer's payroll records. All such messengers, learners, or apprentices shall be listed together as a separate group on the payroll records, with each messenger's, learner's, or apprentice's occupation being shown.
( b ) At the time learners are hired, the employer shall also obtain and keep in his/her records a statement signed by each employee showing all applicable experience which the learner had in the employer's industry, including vocational training, during the preceding three years. The statement shall contain the dates of such previous employment, names and addresses of employers, the occupation or occupations in which the learner was engaged and the types of products upon which the learner worked. The statement shall also contain information concerning pertinent training in vocational training schools or similar training facilities, including the dates of such training and the identity of the vocational school or training facility. If the learner has had no applicable experience or pertinent training, a statement to that effect signed by the learner shall likewise be kept in the employer's records.
( c ) The employer shall maintain a file of all evidence and records, including any correspondence, pertaining to the filing or cancellation of job orders placed with the local State or Territorial Public Employment Service Office pertaining to job orders for occupations to be performed by learners.
( d ) Every employer who employs apprentices under temporary or special certificates shall preserve for three years from the last effective date of the certificate copies of the apprenticeship program, apprenticeship agreement and special certificate under which such an apprentice is employed.
( e ) Every apprenticeship committee which holds a certificate under this part shall keep the following records for each apprentice under its control and supervision: ( 1 ) The apprenticeship program, apprenticeship agreement and special certificate under which the apprentice is employed by an employer;
( 2 ) The cumulative amount of work experience gained by the apprentice, in order to establish the proper wage at the time of his/her assignment to an employer; and
( 3 ) A list of the employers to whom the apprentice was assigned and the period of time he/she worked for each employer.
( f ) The records required in this section, including a copy of the application(s) submitted and any special certificate(s) issued, shall be kept and made available for inspection for at least three years from the expiration date of the certificate(s).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements of Mark IV Industries, Inc. and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         120,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  480,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,600
<INVENTORY>                                    393,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,086,300
<PP&E>                                         847,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,420,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          627,900
<BONDS>                                        793,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                     751,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,420,500
<SALES>                                      2,210,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,210,200
<CGS>                                        1,497,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,971,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                176,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            109,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,600
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.D. Leslie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/ R. D. Leslie                                  
|R.D. Leslie Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2006

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any other purpose.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2011-0009]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Working Capital 
Guarantee.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission 
is to create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through 
direct loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credits. By 
neutralizing the effect of export credit support offered by foreign 
governments and by absorbing credit risks that the private sector will 
not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. exporters to compete fairly in 
foreign markets on the basis of price and product. Under the Working 
Capital Guarantee Program, Ex-Im Bank provides repayment guarantees to 
lenders on secured, short-term working capital loans made to qualified 
exporters. The guarantee may be approved for a single loan or a 
revolving line of credit.
    In the event that a borrower defaults on a transaction guaranteed 
by Ex-Im Bank the guaranteed lender may seek payment by the submission 
of a claim. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 
U.S.C. 635(a)(1), to determine if such claim complies with the terms 
and conditions of the relevant insurance policy.
    This form can be reviewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/EIB10 
04.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before March 2, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-NEW.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: Notice of Claim and Proof of Loss, Working 
Capital. Guarantee (EIB 10-04)
    OMB Number: 3048-XXXX.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: This collection provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the 
information necessary to process the filing of a claim for a defaulted 
transaction under Ex-Im Bank's Working Capital Guarantee program.
    Number of respondents: 20.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-2038 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60533

Summary Calendar

DAVID FERNANDO GALVEZ-COLINDRES,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A43 283 598

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Fernando Galvez-Colindres, a citizen and native of Guatemala, petitions this court

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA) order affirming the immigration judge’s

(IJ) order finding him subject to removal and denying his request for withholding of removal. 

When, as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision. See Mikhael v. INS,

115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997).
No. 06-60533

-2-

Galvez-Colindres argues the BIA erred in upholding his

removal because the cancellation of his prior removal order

waived his prior convictions and that his current conviction for

simple possession of less than 30 grams of marijuana did not

satisfy the requirements for removal under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1227(a)(2)(B)(i). This court reviews the BIA’s rulings of law

de novo. Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir.

2001). In Molenda v. INS, 998 F.2d 291, 294 (5th Cir. 1993),the

court held that the grant of relief from deportation “merely

waives the finding of deportability rather than the basis for

deportability itself. Therefore the crimes alleged for

deportability do not disappear from the alien’s record for

immigration purposes.” Galvez-Colindres’s petition for review

based on this issue is denied.

Galvez-Colindres raises two issues in his petition for

review that were not presented to the BIA. First, he asserts

that the IJ erred in considering his motion for withholding of

removal as a request for withholding of removal rather than a

request for cancellation of removal. Second, he asserts that his

counsel was ineffective during the proceedings before the IJ. 

This portion of Galvez-Colindres’s petition for review is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Galvez-Colindres

failed to pursue these issues before the BIA. See Goonsuwan v.

Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 389-90 (5th Cir. 2001). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART, DENIED IN PART.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC00-92-000]


Nevada Sun-Peak Limited Partnership and Sun-Peak Power, LLC; 
Notice of Filing

May 22, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 17, 2000, Nevada Sun-Peak Limited 
Partnership and Sun-Peak Power, LLC (Applicants) filed with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal 
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824b, and Part 33 of the Commission's regulations, 
a joint Application requesting that the Commission approve the 
transaction by which Sun-Peak Power, LLC will acquire general and 
limited partnership interests in Nevada Sun-Peak Limited Partnership, 
and a request for expedited consideration. Pursuant to 18 CFR 388.112, 
Applicants request confidential treatment of Exhibit H to the 
Application.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 16, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13222 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 779.343 Combinations of exemptions. ( a ) An employee may be engaged in a particular workweek in two or more types of activities for each of which a specific exemption is provided by the Act. The combined work of the employee during such a workweek may not satisfy the requirements of either exemption. It is not the intent of the Act, however, that an exemption based on the performance of one exempt activity should be defeated by the performance of another activity which has been made the basis of an equivalent exemption under another provision of the Act. Thus, where an employee during a particular workweek is exclusively engaged in performing two or more activities to which different exemptions are applicable, each of which activities considered separately would be an exempt activity under the applicable exemption if it were the sole activity of the employee for the whole workweek in question, as a matter of enforcement policy the employee will be considered exempt during such workweek. If the scope of such exemptions is not the same, the exemption applicable to the employee will be equivalent to that provided by whichever exemption provision is more limited in scope.
( b ) In the case of an establishment which sells both goods and services at retail and which qualifies as an exempt establishment under section 13(a)(2), but cannot, as a whole, meet the tests of section 13(a)(4) because it sells services as well as goods, a combination of section 13(a)(2) and 13(a)(4) exemptions may nevertheless be available for employees of the establishment who make or process, on the premises, goods which it sells. Such employees employed by an establishment which, as a whole, meets the tests set forth in section 13(a)(2), will be considered exempt under this combination exemption if the establishment, on the basis of all its activities other than sales of services, would meet the tests of section 13(a)(4).
( c ) Where two or more exemptions are applicable to an employee's work or employment during a workweek and where he may be exempt under a combination of exemptions stated above, the availability of a combination exemption will depend on whether the employee meets all the requirements of each exemption which it is sought to combine.
(74 South. 1007)

#### McGRADY v. STATE.

(6 Div. 97.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 1917.)

Appeal from Criminal Court, Jefferson County; H. P. Heflin, Judge.

McQueen & Ellis, of Birmingham, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

The defendant was convicted of an assault with a weapon, and appeals, without reserving a bill of exceptions. We have examined the record, and find it free from error. Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2 Time Sharing Termination Letter (Q1 2015)








Exhibit 10.2





February 27, 2015


BY HAND


Mr. David R. Beran
6601 West Broad Street
Richmond, VA  23230




Re:  Termination of Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement


Dear Dave:


In connection with your retirement, we confirm that the Time Sharing Agreement, dated July 25, 2012, between you and Altria Client Services Inc. will terminate effective at 12:01 a.m. on February 28, 2015.  Invoices for any charges incurred through the date of termination will be forwarded in the ordinary course of business and will be payable on the terms set forth in the Time Sharing Agreement.


Best regards.


Altria Client Services Inc.






By:  /s/ J. MARK DEBORD
Name:  J. Mark DeBord
Title:  Vice President, HR Client Services






AGREED TO AS OF THE DATE INDICATED:






/s/ DAVID R. BERAN
David R. Beran
Date:  February 27, 2015



Altria Client Services Inc.
6601 West Broad Street, Richmond, VA  23230
804-274-2000
Exhibit 32(a)





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report
of The LGL Group, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Robert Zylstra, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
      13, 2008
            
            /s/ Robert
      ZylstraName:
            Robert
      ZylstraTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
§ 2702.8 Categories of requesters and applicable fees. ( a ) *Commercial requesters.* When documents are requested for commercial use, the requester will be assessed the full direct costs of searching for, reviewing for release, and duplicating the records sought.
( b ) *Educational or noncommercial scientific institutions requesters.* When records are being requested by educational or noncommercial scientific institutions whose purpose is scholarly or scientific research, and not for commercial use, the requester will be assessed only for the cost of duplicating the records sought, but no charge will be made for the first 100 paper pages reproduced.
( c ) *News media requesters.* When records are being requested by representatives of the “news media,” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(ii) of the FOIA, the requester will be assessed only for the cost of duplicating the records sought, but no charge will be made for the first 100 paper pages reproduced.
( d ) *Other requesters.* For any other request not described in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, the requester will be assessed the full direct costs of searching for and duplicating the records sought, except that no charge will be made for the first two hours of manual search time and the first 100 paper pages of reproduction.
( e ) *Requesters acting in concert.* For purposes of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, whenever it reasonably appears that a requester, or a group of requesters acting in concert, is attempting to break down a single request into a series of requests relating to the same subject matter for the purpose of evading the assessment of fees, such requests will be aggregated and fees assessed accordingly.
( f ) *Clarification of records use.* Where the FOIA officer has reasonable cause to doubt the use to which a requester will put the records sought, or where that use is not clear from the request itself, the FOIA officer may seek clarification from the requester before assigning the request to a specific category for fee assessment purposes.
#### § 793.3 Statutory provision.

Section 13(b) (9) of the Act exempts from the overtime requirements of section 7, but not from the minimum wage provisions of section 6, of the Act:

any employee employed as an announcer, news editor, or chief engineer by a radio or television station the major studio of which is located (A) in a city or town of one hundred thousand population or less, according to the latest available decennial census figures as compiled by the Bureau of the Census except where such city or town is part of a standard metropolitan statistical area, as defined and designated by the Bureau of the Budget, which has a total population in excess of one hundred thousand, or (B) in a city or town of twenty-five thousand population or less, which is part of such an area but is at least 40 airline miles from the principal city in such area.