alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40080

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO PEREZ-RUANO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:15-CR-212-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto PerezRuano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Ruano has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40080 Document: 00513721948 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
No. 16-40080

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40080 Document: 00513721948 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
#### § 780.605 Employment in agriculture.

One requirement for exemption is that the employee be employed in “agriculture.” “Agriculture,” as used in the Act, is defined in section 3(f) as follows:

(f) “Agriculture” includes farming in all its branches and among other things includes the cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural commodities (including commodities defined as agricultural commodities in section 15(g) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, as amended), the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, or poultry, and any practices (including any forestry or lumbering operations) performed by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, including preparation for market, delivery to storage or to market or to carriers for transportation to market.

An employee meets the tests of being employed in agriculture when he either engages in any one or more of the branches of farming listed in the first part of the above definition or performs, as an employee of a farmer or on a farm, practices incident to such farming operations as mentioned in the second part of the definition (*Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.* v. *McComb,* 337 U.S. 755). The exemption applies to “any employee” of a farmer whose employment meets the tests for exemption. Accordingly, any employee of the farmer who is employed in “agriculture,” including laborers, clerical, maintenance, and custodial employees, harvesters, dairy workers, and others may qualify for the exemption under section 13(b)(13) if the other conditions of the exemption are met.
Last updated on Monday, May 05, 2014 http://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/



## Air Markets Program Data Contact Us
H ome Query Maps & Reports Prepackaged Data Glossary Related Resources About



# Air Markets Program Data The Air Markets Program Data tool allows users to search E PA data to answer scientific, general, policy, and regulatory questions about industry e missions. More information about EPA's emissions trading programs can be found on our Programs and Regulations page. Get started: Visit the About page to view the Air Markets Program Data Video Tut orial. 

# Create a Query This section allows users to create custom queries of emissions, allowance, compliance and/or facility information. The query tool allows users to create user-defined queries based on program, date, location, facility name, unit characteristics or classifications, owners and operators, or representatives. The results can be previewed or downloaded. 

### START 

# Get Maps & ReportsThis section allows users to access maps and predefined reports of emissions and allowance data wit h a simple, interactive interface. Several reports and charts are available to show tr ends in emissions, view top emitters, look up your allow ance account balance, view allowance allocations, and mo re.



### START


# Air Markets Program Data Highlights March 14, 2014 AMPD will not be available this Sunday, March 16th from 12:00 noon until approxima tely 9:00 p.m. EST due to scheduled upgrades. 

### More 

# Page 1 of 1 Air Markets Program Data | US EPA

6/4/2014 http://ampd.epa.gov/ampd/
NO. 07-02-0181-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MAY 20, 2002

______________________________

JONATHON ANTWAN DONALDSON

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

NO. 902,509; HON. MICHAEL McSPALDEN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Appellant, Jonathon Antwon Donaldson, appeals from a judgment under which he

was convicted of possession with intent to deliver cocaine weighing more than 1 gram and

less than 4. The clerk’s record has been filed in this cause but the reporter’s record has

not. Furthermore, appellant, has filed a pro se “Petition to Dismiss” requesting the appeal

be withdrawn. However, the notice is not signed by appellant as required by Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). 
2

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 209th District

Court of Harris County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following: 

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and, 

2. whether appellant is indigent. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings

of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and

all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental

record with the clerk of this court on or before June 19, 2002. Should further time be

needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then an extension must be requested

before June 19, 2002. Furthermore, should appellant submit to this court a document

complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and evincing his decision to

withdraw his notice of appeal before the trial court convenes a hearing pursuant to this

order, then the appeal will be reinstated, and the court will act on the matter in due course.

 It is so ordered. 

 Per Curiam 

 Do not publish.
#### § 511.6 Investigation.

The Administrator shall prepare an economic report containing such data as can be assembled pertinent to the matters to be referred to a committee. A copy of these regulations will be sent to all members of the committee following their appointment, and a copy of the economic report when completed will be furnished promptly. Before making its report the committee will decide whether it will conduct any further investigation, apart from the hearing and the review of the economic report, in connection with the matters referred to it.

[55 FR 53298, Dec. 28, 1990]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20211]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Disability Employment Program


``Add Us In'' Initiative

AGENCY: Office of Disability Employment Policy, Department of Labor.

ACTION: Correction to the Funding Opportunity Number and Closing Date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Disability Employment Policy, Department of 
Labor is correcting the New Notice of Availability of Funds and 
Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for Cooperative Agreements 
published in the Federal Register on August 4, 2011 at 76 FR 150. 
Specifically, we are correcting the Funding Opportunity Number to SGA 
11-05 and the Closing Date for receipt of applications to September 2, 
2011. The full Solicitation for Grant Applications is posted on http://www.grants.gov under U.S. Department of Labor/ODEP. If you need to 
speak to a person concerning these grants, you may telephone Cassandra 
Mitchell at 202-693-4570 (not a toll-free number).

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August 2011.
Cassandra R. Mitchell,
Grant Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20211 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On July 7, 2011, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on August 8, 2011 to: James G. Bockheim; Permit No. 2012-004.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-20409 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
(77 South. 979)

#### MELTON v. Z. J. FORT PRODUCE CO.

(6 Div. 477.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 15, 1918.)

"Appeal and Error &wkey;>655(2) — Bill of Exceptions — Time for Filing.

Where it affirmatively appears that bill of exceptions was not presented within 90 days from the day judgment was entered, as required by Code 1907, § 3019, it will be stricken on motion.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; John H. Miller, Judge.

Action between T. O. Melton and Z. J. Fort Produce Company. From judgment, T. O. Melton appeals.

Affirmed.

Allen & Fisk, of Birmingham, for appellant. N. L. Steele, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BRICKEN, J.

This cause is submitted on motion to strike the bill of exceptions and upon its merits. The motion to strike the hill of exceptions is based upon the grounds that it was not presented to the trial judge within 00 days, as required by law. Code 1007, § 3019. This motion seems to be well taken, and therefore must be granted, as it affirmatively appears that the bill of exceptions was not presented within 90 days from the day on which the judgment was entered. As shown by the record, the judgment in this case was entered on the 28th day of February, 1917, and the bill of exceptions was presented May 31, 1917. Excluding the first day and including the last day, as the law requires, it is shown that 92 days had elapsed, and for this reason the bill of exceptions is stricken. Rice v. Beavers & Co., 196 Ala. 355, 71 South. 659.

The record proper discloses no error of a reversible nature, and therefore the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
----

----

I Informacja

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

4 sierpnia 2004

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----
Promulgation: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation for Telephone Call on April 20, 2010with 3M RepresentativesRegarding Fluorinated GasProduction Re-Proposal RuleDates:April 20, 2010Staff Contact Information (Name, email, phone #):Deborah Ottinger, EPA, 202-343-9149,Ottinger.deborah@epa.gov; Karen Schaffner, RTI,ksschaffner@rti.orgName of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible):Dana Schnobrich, 3MSummary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.):The purpose of the call was to discuss their public comments regarding emission estimation techniques available to calculate fluorinated GHGemissions along with other concerns regarding the reporting rule.3M representative expressed approval that the options were expanded in the re-proposed rule, but anticipates submitting a fairnumber ofcomments on the details, particularly the batch process tesing issues. 3M also plans to comment onthe overlap of the fundamentals of subparts OOand L and on compounds not being listed in TableA-1 and what GWPs would be used for these.3M representative had concerns about whether scrubbers would be considered destruction devices and facilities are obligated todo testing. Ifemissions are not vented to thermal oxidizer, the emissions aresent to backup scrubbers where HF is removed, and the F GHG arenot scrubbable.There may be some compounds that meet the definition of a FGHG based on vapor pressure, and these compounds may be converted to salts andso are removed.3M noted that multiple compounds emitted from fluoroelastomers and fluoropolymers processes are not included in Table A-1. When a F GHG isemitted at levels greater than 1 mt F GHG and there is no GWP available, these processes will be required to conduct emission testing.3M noted that speciating and quantifying every component of a stream is difficult. It is relatively straightforward to identify components that aregreater than 1 percent, however then you get to the “cats anddogs” of the stream, i.e., small relative concentration and multiple components.These small components often do not have GWPs, so difficult to determine the CO2e.3M would like EPA to develop an approval process for GWPs that are published in literature.Written Comments Provided?No.Did they also submit to Docket?No.Date sent to EPA- CCDNone
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
iVillage Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2003, the undersigned, Douglas W.
McCormick, Chief Executive Officer of iVillage Inc., hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
                  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of iVillage Inc.


May 15, 2003                                          /s/ Douglas W. McCormick
------------                                          ------------------------
Date                                                  Douglas W. McCormick
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to iVillage Inc. and will be
retained by iVillage Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

----

----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

----

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

10 Νοεμβρίου 2004

(2004/C 276/01)

1 ευρώ= 

----

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

----

----

Ανακοίνωση για την επικείμενη λήξη ορισμένων μέτρων αντιντάμπινγκ

(2004/C 276/02)

2.   Διαδικασία

Oι κοινοτικοί παραγωγοί δύνανται να υποβάλουν γραπτώς αίτηση επανεξέτασης. Η αίτηση αυτή πρέπει να περιέχει επαρκή αποδεικτικά στοιχεία σύμφωνα με τα οποία η άρση των μέτρων αυτών θα μπορούσε να οδηγήσει στη συνέχιση ή την επανάληψη των πρακτικών ντάμπινγκ και της ζημίας.

Σε περίπτωση κατά την οποία η Επιτροπή αποφασίσει να επανεξετάσει τα εν λόγω μέτρα, οι εισαγωγείς, οι εξαγωγείς, οι αντιπρόσωποι της εξάγουσας χώρας και οι κοινοτικοί παραγωγοί θα έχουν τη δυνατότητα να αναπτύξουν, να απορρίψουν ή να σχολιάσουν τα θέματα που εκτίθενται στην αίτηση επανεξέτασης.

3.   Προθεσμία

Οι κοινοτικοί παραγωγοί μπορούν να υποβάλουν γραπτώς αίτηση επανεξέτασης, δυνάμει του προαναφερθέντος άρθρου 11 παράγραφος 2, η οποία πρέπει να περιέλθει στην Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή, Γενική Διεύθυνση Εμπορίου (Τμήμα B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Βρυξέλλες (2), μετά τη δημοσίευση της παρούσας ανακοίνωσης και το αργότερο τρεις μήνες πριν από την ημερομηνία που αναγράφεται στον κατωτέρω πίνακα.

----

(1)EE L 56 της 6.3.1996, σ. 1· κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 461/2004 του Συμβουλίου (ΕΕ L 77 της 13.3.2004, σ. 12).

(2)  Τέλεξ: COMEU 21877· φαξ: (32-2) 295 65 05.

----

Διορθωτικά

----

Διορθωτικό στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 105 της 30ής Απριλίου 2004

(2004/C 276/03)

Το κείμενο εντός πλαισίου στη σελίδα I/7 αντικαθίσταται από το ακόλουθο κείμενο:

«Τα ποσά του παρόντος εγγράφου του προϋπολογισμού εκφράζονται σε ευρώ, εκτός εάν υπάρχει αντίθετη ένδειξη.

Τα ενδεχόμενα έσοδα που προβλέπονται στο άρθρο 18 παράγραφος 1 του δημοσιονομικού κανονισμού, τα εγγεγραμμένα στους τίτλους 5 και 6 της κατάστασης εσόδων, μπορούν να οδηγήσουν στο άνοιγμα συμπληρωματικών πιστώσεων προς εγγραφή στις γραμμές που επιβαρύνθηκαν με την αρχική δαπάνη η οποία οδήγησε στα αντίστοιχα έσοδα.»

----

----

1η Νοεμβρίου 2004 — Η νέα έκδοση EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

Ο νέος δικτυακός τόπος περιλαμβάνει την υπηρεσία CELEX, παρέχοντας παράλληλα δωρεάν και ευχερή πρόσβαση σε 20 γλώσσες στη μεγαλύτερη βάση δεδομένων τεκμηρίωσης για το κοινοτικό δίκαιο.

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. QF87-407-005]


Pedricktown Cogeneration Limited Partnership; Notice of 
Application for Commission Recertification of Qualifying Status of a 
Cogeneration Facility

May 22, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 16, 2000, Pedricktown Cogeneration Limited 
Partnership, 143 Highway 130, Pedricktown, NJ 08067, filed with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for recertification 
of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to Section 
292.207(a) of the Commission's Regulations. No determination has been 
made that the submittal constitutes a complete filing. The facility is 
a topping-cycle cogeneration facility with a maximum net electric power 
production capacity of 117.8 MW. It is interconnected with Atlantic 
City Electric Company and sells electric capacity and energy on a 
merchant basis in PJM.
    The Commission previously certified the facility as a qualifying 
cogeneration facility in docket No. QF87-407-000, Pedricktown 
Cogeneration Limited Partnership, 41 FERC para. 62,025 (1987) and 
recertified the facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility in 
Docket No. QF87-407-003, 50 FERC para. 62,069 (1990) and Docket No. 
QF87-407-004, 73 FERC para. 62,108 (1995). Notices of Self-
certification were filed on May 7, 1987 (Docket No. QF87-407-001) and 
on November 2, 1987 (Docket No. QF87-407-002).
    Recertification is sought to reflect the proposed sale of half of 
the upstream ownership interests in the Facility and to report certain 
changes in operating mode resulting from recent contract restructuring.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before June 15, 2000. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13224 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M