alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Joseph E. Macharsky, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of The Boyds Collection, Ltd.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)             Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure control and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation, and

c)             Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

----

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)             All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| /s/ Joseph E. Macharsky  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Joseph E.  Macharsky     |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |
| Date:  June 8, 2006 |   |

 

----
§ 779.502 Statutory provisions; regulations in part 1500 of this title. ( a ) The Act's prohibitions in relation to employment of child labor, which may have application to retailers, are found in section 12(a) and section 12(c). Section 12(a) reads as follows: No producer, manufacturer, or dealer shall ship or deliver for shipment in commerce any goods produced in an establishment situated in the United States in or about which within 30 days prior to the removal of such goods therefrom any oppressive child labor has been employed: *Provided,* That any such shipment or delivery for shipment of such goods by a purchaser who acquired them in good faith in reliance on written assurance from the producer, manufacturer, or dealer that the goods were produced in compliance with the requirements of this section, and who acquired such goods for value without notice of any such violation, shall not be deemed prohibited by this subsection and conviction of a defendant for the shipment or delivery for shipment of any goods under the conditions herein prohibited shall be a bar to any further prosecution against the same defendant for shipments or deliveries for shipment of any such goods before the beginning of said prosecution.
Section 12(c) provides: No employer shall employ any oppressive child labor in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce or in any enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.
( b ) “Oppressive child labor” is defined by the Act, for purposes of the foregoing provisions, in the language set forth in § 779.505.
( c ) Sections 570.1 to 570.129 of this chapter contain applicable regulations and a detailed discussion of the child labor provisions of the Act. Although those sections offer guidance for all including retailers, there are set forth in §§ 779.503 through 779.508 pertinent provisions and a brief discussion of the standards which are of particular interest to those in the retail field.
# EUR-Lex - 32000R1045 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32000R1045

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1045/2000 of 18 May 2000 fixing the guarantee threshold quantities that can be transferred to other groups of varieties in the raw tobacco sector for the 2000 harvest **

*
Official Journal L 118 , 19/05/2000 P. 0018 - 0019 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1045/2000

of 18 May 2000

fixing the guarantee threshold quantities that can be transferred to other groups of varieties in the raw tobacco sector for the 2000 harvest

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 660/1999(2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 introduces a system of quotas for the various groups of tobacco varieties. The individual quotas were allocated to the producers on the basis of the guarantee thresholds for the 2000 harvest fixed in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 660/1999. Article 9(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 allows the Commission to authorise the Member States to transfer guarantee threshold quantities between groups of varieties. The transfers between groups of varieties contemplated do not give rise to any additional expenditure to the EAGGF and do not entail any increase in the overall guarantee threshold of each Member State.

(2) This Regulation must apply as soon as possible and, at all events, well before the time limit for the conclusion of cultivation contracts laid down in Article 10(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 of 22 December 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as regards the premium scheme, production quotas and the specific aid to the granted to producer groups in the raw tobacco sector(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 909/1999(4).

(3) The measures laid down in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Tobacco,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2000 harvest, in accordance with Article 22(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98, the Member States are hereby authorised to transfer quantities between groups of varieties as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2000.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70.

(2) OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 17.

(4) OJ L 105, 3.5.2000, p. 18.

ANNEX

THRESHOLD GUARANTEE QUANTITIES THAT CAN BE TRANSFERRED BETWEEN GROUPS OF VARIETIES BY THE MEMBER STATES

>TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6005

JOE EARL LEWIS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL BELL, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-299) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joe Earl Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolin, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joe Earl Lewis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Bell , No. CA-97-299 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph E. Macharsky,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to The BoydsCollection, Ltd. and will be retained by The Boyds Collection, Ltd. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
| /s/ Joseph E. Macharsky |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Joseph E. Macharsky     |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| June 8, 2006       |   |   |

 

----
Amedment No.1 to the Amended and Restated Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan



 
EXHIBIT 10.2

 
R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY

 
APPROVAL 
 
BY 
VICE PRESIDENT, COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 
 
ADOPTING 
 
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE, 
 
to the 
JANUARY 1, 1989 Restatement 
of the 
 
R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 
UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN 
 
Pursuant to Section 3.12 of the By-Laws of R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (the “Company”) and authority delegated pursuant
thereto by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, the undersigned Vice President, Compensation and Employee Benefits (the “Vice President”) hereby adopts the document attached hereto entitled
“Amendment Number One to the January 1, 1989 Restatement of the R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan.” 
 
Executed by the Vice President this 27 day of August, 1999. 
 
 

	
	

	 John J. McEnery
 Vice President, Compensation and Employee Benefits



 
 
 







R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 
 
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
to the 
January 1, 1989 Restatement 
of the 
 
R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 
UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN 
 
WHEREAS, R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company (the “Company”) maintains for the benefit of certain of its employees and certain
employees of its participating subsidiaries the R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan (the “Plan”); 
 
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to liberalize the circumstances under which the Plan Administrator may direct that a Member
will receive a lump sum distribution of his benefit under the Plan; and 
 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment in Section 10 of the Plan, effective September 1, 1999, the Plan is hereby amended in
the following respects: 
 
1. The fourth sentence
of Section 8 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in any case in which the aggregate lump sum Actuarial Equivalent of the Supplemental Retirement Benefit payable to or on behalf of a Member would be $10,000 or less (or
such other amount as the Plan Administrator shall determine) as of such Member’s Benefit Starting Date under the Qualified Plan, the Plan Administrator may, in his or her sole discretion, direct payment of such benefit in a lump sum.

 
2. The last sentence of Section 9 is hereby
amended by inserting the following clause at the end thereof: 
 
; provided, however, that if the lump sum Actuarial Equivalent of the supplemental survivor benefit is $10,000 or less (or such other amount as the Plan Administrator shall determine) as
of such commencement date, the Plan Administrator may, in his or her sole discretion direct payment of such benefit in the form of a lump sum.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Madison Gas and Electric Company on Form S-3
(Registration No. 33-52491 and Registration No. 33-24115) of our
report dated February 9, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Madison Gas and Electric Company as of
December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, and for the years then ended,
which reports are included or incorporated by reference in this
annual report on Form 10-K.





Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 25, 1996                     COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
§ 2520.104-27 Alternative method of compliance for certain unfunded dues financed pension plans maintained by employee organizations. ( a ) *Scope.* Under the authority of section 110 of the Act, a pension benefit plan that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section is exempted from the provisions of the Act that require filing with the Secretary an annual report and furnishing a summary annual report to participants and beneficiaries receiving benefits. Such plans may use a simplified method of reporting and disclosure to comply with the requirement to furnish a summary plan description to participants and beneficiaries receiving benefits, as follows: ( 1 ) In lieu of filing an annual report with the Secretary or distributing a summary annual report, a filing is made of Report Form LM-2 or LM-3, pursuant to the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) and regulations thereunder, and
( 2 ) In lieu of a summary plan description, the employee organization constitution or bylaws may be furnished in accordance with § 2520.104b-2 to participants and beneficiaries together with any supplement to such document necessary to meet the requirements of §§ 2520.102-2 and 2520.102-3.
( b ) *Application.* This exemption is available only to pension benefit plans maintained by an employee organization, as that term is defined in section 3(4) of the Act, paid for out of the employee organization's general assets, which are derived wholly or partly from membership dues, and which cover employee organization members and their beneficiaries.
( c ) *Limitations.* This exemption does not exempt the administrator from any other requirement of part 1 of title I of the Act.
[42 FR 37184, July 19, 1977, as amended at 67 FR 777, Jan. 7, 2002]
§ 1919.80 Heat treatment. ( a ) Wherever heat treatment of any loose gear is recommended by the manufacturer, it shall be carried out in accordance with the specifications of the manufacturer.
#### § 4903.3 Do these regulations adopt the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS)?

This part adopts and incorporates all provisions of FCCS. This part also supplements the FCCS by prescribing procedures consistent with FCCS, as necessary and appropriate for PBGC operations.
§ 780.316 Thirteen week provision. ( a ) The exemption provides that an “employee must have been employed in agriculture less than 13 weeks during the preceding calendar year.” For purposes of determining whether a worker has been employed in agriculture less than 13 weeks during the preceding calendar year, a week is considered to be a fixed and regularly recurring period of 168 hours consisting of seven consecutive 24-hour periods during which the employee worked at least 1 “man-day.” Section 3(u) of the Act defines a man-day as “any day during which an employee performs any agricultural labor for not less than 1 hour.”
( b ) In defining the term “week” in this manner for purposes of section 13(a)(6)(C) (as well as section 3(e)(2)) comports with the traditional definition of week used in administering all the other provisions of the law. On this basis, the phrase “employed in agriculture less than 13 weeks” means that an employee has spent less than 13 weeks in agricultural work, regardless of the number of hours he worked during each one of the 13 weekly units. This position recognizes and accommodates to situations where an employee works very long as well as very short hours during the week. This would accord with the legislative history of this exemption which clearly indicates that it was meant to apply only to temporary workers whose hours of work would undoubtedly vary in length, and would, thereby effectuate the legislative intent.
( c ) In determining the 13-week period, not only that work for the current employer in the preceding calendar year is counted, but also that agricultural work for all employers in the previous year. It is the total of all weeks of agricultural employment by the employee for all employers in the preceding calendar year that determines whether he meets the 13-week test. In this respect a self-employed farmer who works as a hand harvest laborer during part of the year is considered to be “employed” in agriculture only during those weeks when he is an employee of other farmers. Thus, such weeks of employment are to be counted but any weeks when he works only for himself are not counted toward the 13 weeks.
( d ) The 13-week test applies to each individual worker. It does not apply on a family basis. To carry the example in the preceding section further, members of a tractor driver's family who reside on the farm could be employed in picking cotton within the terms of the exemption even though the driver had been employed in agriculture as much as 13 weeks in the previous calendar year, so long as the family members themselves had not.
( e ) If an employer claims this exemption, it is the employer's responsibility to obtain a statement from the employee showing the number of weeks he was employed in agriculture during the preceding calendar year. This requirement is contained in the recordkeeping regulations in § 516.33 (d) of this chapter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELIUD MONTANEZ

- CASTRO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 761 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Trends in the Employment of Women, 1928-36

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth. 						*Trends in the Employment of Women, 1928-36 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 159*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1938,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5432,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer of Siena Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

      (1)   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
            June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


September 25, 2002                   By  /s/ JOHN P.  KNEAFSEY
                                       -----------------------------
                                             John P. Kneafsey
                                          Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,  John P. Kneafsey, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Siena Holdings,
            Inc.;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
            fact, necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
            circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
            with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this annual report, fairly present, in all
            material respects, the financial condition, results of operations
            and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented
            in this annual report.

[Items 4, 5 and 6 omitted pursuant to the transition provisions of Release No.
34-46427.]


September 25, 2002                   By  /s/ JOHN P.  KNEAFSEY
                                       -----------------------------
                                             John P. Kneafsey
                                          Chief Executive Officer
#### § 500.156 Scope of agreements with Federal agencies.

Every agreement between the Secretary and any other Federal agency under the authority referred to in § 500.155 of this part shall contain terms and conditions mutually agreeable to both parties, and shall contain such delegation of authority as the Secretary deems useful.