alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 983 

For the relief of Michael Anthony Hurley. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Michael Anthony Hurley. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MICHAEL 

4 ANTHONY HURLEY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) and section 240 of such Act (8 

8 U.S.C. 1229a), Michael Anthony Hurley shall be eligible 

9 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

10 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

11 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an imVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:05 Mar 28, 2007 Jkt 059196 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S983.IS S983

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 983 IS

1 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjust2 ment of status to lawful permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Michael Anthony 

4 Hurley enters the United States before the filing deadline 

5 specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have 

6 entered and remained lawfully and, if otherwise eligible, 

7 shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) 

9 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of 

15 this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Michael Anthony Hurley, the Secretary of State 

19 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

20 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

21 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

22 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

23 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

24 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 983 IS

1 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

2 under section 202(e) of such Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Michael Anthony Hurley 

6 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

7 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na8 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4009-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-4009-DR), dated July 28, 2011, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 10, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 28, 2011.

Kanabec County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.) 

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2011-20800 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Argued and submitted March 31,

conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing May 12,

respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed July 20 allowed by opinion September 1, 1993

See 123 OrApp 93 (1993)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*PAUL DOUGLAS WELLS, *Appellant.*

(10-91-08165; CA A72939)

850 P2d 1172

Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing. *State v. Morgan,*116 Or App 338, 842 P2d 406 (1992), *rev allowed*315 Or 442 (1993).
§ 525.1 Introduction. The Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-486, 100 Stat. 1229) substantially revised those provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201) (FLSA) permitting the employment of individuals disabled for the work to be performed (workers with disabilities) at special minimum wage rates below the rate that would otherwise be required by statute. These provisions are codified at section 14(c) of the FLSA and: ( a ) Provide for the employment under certificates of individuals with disabilities at special minimum wage rates which are commensurate with those paid to workers not disabled for the work to be performed employed in the vicinity for essentially the same type, quality, and quantity of work;
( b ) Require employers to provide written assurances that wage rates of individuals paid on an hourly rate basis be reviewed at least once every six months and that the wages of all employees be reviewed at least annually to reflect changes in the prevailing wages paid to experienced individuals not disabled for the work to be performed employed in the locality for essentially the same type of work;
( c ) Prohibit employers from reducing the wage rates prescribed by certificate in effect on June 1, 1986, for two years;
( d ) Permit the continuance or establishment of work activities centers; and
( e ) Provide that any employee receiving a special minimum wage rate pursuant to section 14(c), or the parent or guardian of such an employee, may petition for a review of that wage rate by an administrative law judge.
#### § 4050.407 PBGC discretion.

PBGC may in appropriate circumstances extend deadlines, excuse noncompliance, and grant waivers with regard to any provision of this subpart to promote the purposes of the missing participants program and title IV of ERISA. Like circumstances will be treated in like manner under this section.
#### § 776.22a Extension of coverage to employment in certain enterprises.

Whether or not individually covered on the traditional basis, an employee is covered on an “enterprise” basis by the Act as amended in 1961 and 1966 if he is “employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce” as defined in section 3 (r), (s), of the Act. “Enterprise” is defined generally by section 3(r) to mean “the related activities performed (either through unified operation or common control) by any person or persons for a common business purpose, and includes all such activities whether performed in one or more establishments or by one or more corporate or other organizational units.” If an “enterprise” as thus defined is an “enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce” as defined and described in section 3(s) of the Act as amended, any employee employed in such enterprise is subject to the provisions of the Act to the same extent as if he were individually engaged “in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce”, unless specifically exempt, section 3(s), insofar as pertinent to the construction industry, reads as follows:

Enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce means an enterprise which has employees engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, including employees handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods that have been moved in or produced for commerce by any person, and which:

---

(3) Is engaged in the business of construction or reconstruction, or both.

Questions of “enterprise coverage” in the construction industry which are not answered in published statements of the Department of Labor may be addressed to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, or assistance may be requested from any of the Regional or District Offices of the Division.

[35 FR 5543, Apr. 3, 1970]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 10

                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is
effective as of February 11, 2001, by and between LifePoint CSGP, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), and James M. Fleetwood, Jr.
(the "Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Executive and LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("LifePoint"), entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of
June 8, 2000, relating to the Executive's service as Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of LifePoint (the "Employment Agreement");

         WHEREAS, LifePoint assigned its right, title, interest and obligations
in the Employment Agreement to the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have agreed to amend the
Employment Agreement as provided in this Amendment.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1. Annual Bonus. The second sentence of Section 2(b) of the Employment
Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu
thereof:

         "Such Annual Bonus for any calendar year shall equal 75% of his Base
         Salary (as in effect on the last day of such year) if LifePoint shall
         achieve but not exceed the applicable Annual Targets and shall exceed
         75% of such Base Salary if LifePoint shall exceed the applicable Annual
         Targets, but in no event shall such Annual Bonus exceed 100% of such
         Base Salary."

         2. Counterpart Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

         3. Binding Effect. Except as hereby modified, the Employment Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby ratified by the parties.



<PAGE>   2

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment
effective as of the date first written above.


                                    LIFEPOINT CSGP, LLC



                                    By: /s/ William F. Carpenter III
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William F. Carpenter III
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        General Counsel



                                        /s/ James M. Fleetwood, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James M. Fleetwood, Jr.









                                       2
#### Rudolph CUNNINGHAM *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5650

471 S.W. 2d 777

Opinion delivered October 25, 1971

*Dana Davis,*for appellant.

*Ray Thornton,*Attorney General, for appellee.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The only point raised in this appeaJ from the trial court’s denial of appellant Rudolph Cunningham’s post conviction relief is the assertion that he was denied a' fair trial because the deputy prosecuting attorney threatened one of the State’s witnesses with perjury if she did not tell the truth. The witness, a relative of petitioner, testified that though the threat was made, she only told the truth and nothing but the truth.

We find no merit in the contention.

Affirmed.

Fogleman, J., not participating.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMach 5 electroformed nickel nozzle refurbishment FNAS investigation of ultra-smooth surfacesThis task is in support of the Quiet Hypersonic Wind Tunnel effort currently in effect at NASA Langley Research Center, VA. A laminar flow wind tunnel nozzle has been previously fabricated by electroforming pure nickel over a machined and polished two piece stainless steel mandrel. The mandrel was removed leaving the replicate nozzle surface. The nozzle was then pressed into a heavy stainless steel jacket for mounting features and rigidity. The original nickel surface was a replication of the polished mandrel but had degraded due to oxidation. The inside surface requirements are very stringent in order to achieve laminar or quiet flow at the desired pressure and temperature for the specific design of Mach 5. The throat area of the axisymmetric device must have a surface finish with no defects greater than 16 microinches. This requires an rms average background of about four microinches or better for inspection purposes. A coating of nickel-phosphorous alloy was applied by catalytic deposition and then the inside of the nozzle was polished retaining dimensional and surface finish tolerances as specified per drawings supplied. Since the unit is not an optical component, conventional optical inspection methods for surface finish and figure are not readily achieved. Measurements were made using surface profilometry.Document ID19930005492Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRood, Robert*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Griffith, Charles*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Engelhaupt, Darell*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1992Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-192421NAS 1.26:192421UAH-5-32937Accession Number93N14681Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38609Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930005492.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 528.4 According opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance.

Prior to instituting proceedings for withdrawal of a certificate under paragraph (a) of § 528.3, except in cases of willfullness, an area director shall mail a letter to the employer setting forth alleged facts or conduct which may warrant withdrawal of the certificate, and fixing a time and a place for a conference at which the employer shall be accorded an opportunity to show that no cause for withdrawal under § 528.3(a) exists or that compliance has been achieved by paying wages improperly withheld and by taking steps adequate to insure that new cause for annulment or withdrawal will not occur. By written report to the appropriate authorized representative, a copy of which shall be mailed to the employer, the area director shall concisely summarize the conference and shall include conclusions as to whether the employer demonstrated or achieved compliance. If the authorized representative is satisfied that the employer either demonstrated or achieved such compliance, no proceedings shall be instituted under § 528.3(a) for the withdrawal of the certificate.

(Secretary's Order No. 16-75, dated Nov. 25, 1975 (40 FR 55913), Employment Standards Order 76-2, dated Feb. 23, 1976 (41 FR 9016))

[43 FR 28469, June 30, 1978]
#### § 784.0 Purpose.

It is the purpose of this part to provide an official statement of the views of the Department of Labor with respect to the meaning and application of sections 13(a)(5) and 13(b)(4) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which govern the application of the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements of the Act to employees engaged in fishing and related activities and in operations on aquatic products. It is an objective of this part to make available in one place, the interpretations of law relating to such employment which will guide the Secretary of Labor and the Administrator in carrying out their responsibilities under the Act.
Exhibit 31.1

   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
 Capital Solutions 1, Inc. pursuant to Section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Christopher Astrom, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of Capital Solutions 1, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: September 21, 2006

/s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
---------------------------
Christopher Astrom
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 570.121 Age certificates. ( a ) To protect an employer from unwitting violation of the minimum age standards, it is provided in section 3(1)(2) of the Act that “oppressive child labor shall not be deemed to exist by virtue of the employment in any occupation of any person with respect to whom the employer shall have on file an unexpired certificate issued and held pursuant to regulations of the Secretary of Labor certifying that such person is above the oppressive child labor age.” An age certificate is a statement of a minor's age issued under regulations of the Secretary (Child Labor Regulation No. 1),[31] based on the best available documentary evidence of age, and carrying the signatures of the minor and the issuing officer. Its purpose is to furnish an employer with reliable proof of the age of a minor employee in order that he may, as specifically provided by the act, protect himself against unintentional violation of the child labor provisions. Pursuant to the regulations of the Secretary, State employment or age certificates are accepted as proof of age in 45 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and Federal certificates of age in Idaho, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas. If there is a possibility that the minor whom he intends to employ is below the applicable age minimum for the occupation in which he is to be employed, the employer should obtain an age certificate for him.
( b ) It should be noted that the age certificate furnishes protection to the employer as provided by the act only if it shows the minor to be above the minimum age applicable thereunder to the occupation in which he is employed. Thus, a State certificate which shows a minor's age to be above the minimum required by State law for the occupation in which he is employed does not protect his employer for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act unless the age shown on such certificate is also above the minimum provided under that act for such occupation.
Footnotes -
570.121
[31] Subpart A of this part.