alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust
(the Trust), does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2012 (the Form 10-K) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

U.S. TRUST, BANK OF AMERICA PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE OF MARINE PETROLEUM TRUST



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                           
|Ron E. Hooper                                                               
|Senior Vice President, U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management

Dated: September 24, 2012

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
incorporated by reference into any filings of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 511.15 Submittals prior to reports.

As soon as the receipt of evidence is concluded, a committee or subcommittee presiding at a hearing shall receive any proposed findings of fact and recommendations together with the reasons therefor submitted by any party. These submittals shall be oral unless otherwise directed by the committee or subcommittee. If, in the discretion of the committee or subcommittee such proposals should be in writing, it may grant such additional time as it deems essential.
#### § 780.142 Practices on a farm not related to farming operations.

Practices performed on a farm in connection with nonfarming operations performed on or off such farm do not meet the requirement stated in § 780.141. For example, if a farmer operates a gravel pit on his farm, none of the practices performed in connection with the operation of such gravel pit would be within section 3(f). Whether or not some practices are performed in connection with farming operations conducted on the farm where they are performed must be determined with reference to the purpose of the farmer for whom the practice is performed. Thus, land clearing operations may or may not be connected with such farming operations depending on whether or not the farmer intends to devote the cleared land to farm use.
EXHIBIT 32
                        CORPORATE OFFICERS' CERTIFICATION
               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned officers of MacDermid, Incorporated ("the Corporation") hereby
certify that, as of the date of this statement, the Corporation's annual report
on Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2003 ("the Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations as of and for the
annual period ended December 31, 2003.
The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This statement is not "filed" for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.
Date:  March 15, 2004     /s/  Daniel H. Leever
          Daniel H. Leever
          Chairman, President and
             Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Stephen Love, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ W. STEPHEN LOVE           
|W. Stephen Love               
|Acting Chief Financial Officer
|November 4, 2005              



This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 36.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
<PAGE>

                                       ITEM 12
                   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

                   Name & Address of          Amount & Nature of
Title of Class     Beneficial Owner          Beneficial Ownership    % of Class
--------------     ----------------          --------------------    ----------

                                     ITEM 403(a)
                                     ------------

Class B            Hussey Investments LP            880,881            50.6%
Common Stock       PO Box 35
                   Goshen IN 46527 (1) (2)

                                     ITEM 403(b)
                                     ------------

Class A            Hussey Endeavors LP              593,000            24.1%
Common Stock       PO Box 35
                   Goshen IN 46527 (1) (2)

Class A            Edward J. Hussey                 660,219            26.8%
Common Stock       PO Box 35
                   Goshen IN 46527 (1)

Class A            Edward Joseph Hussey             616,400            25.0%
Common Stock       PO Box 35
Class B            Goshen IN 46527 (2)
Common Stock                                        945,653            54.3%

Class A            Michael F. Hussey                615,835            25.0%
Common Stock       PO Box 35
Class B            Goshen IN 46527 (2)
Common Stock                                        945,088            54.3%

Class A            All Directors and              1,300,454            52.8%
Common Stock       Officers as a Group
Class B                                           1,009,860            58.0%
Common Stock

(1) Edward J. Hussey is a limited partner in both Hussey Investments LP and
Hussey Endeavors LP and accordingly has a pecuniary interest in the shares of
Class B Common Stock owned by Hussey Investments LP and Class A Common Stock
owned by Hussey Endeavors LP.  Edward J. Hussey has no voting or investment
power over such shares and accordingly disclaims beneficial ownership of such
shares.
(2) Edward Joseph Hussey , Michael F. Hussey, John P. Hussey and Nancy A.
Parrish are the general partners of Hussey Investments LP and general partners
of Hussey Endeavors LP.  Accordingly, they share voting and investment control
over the 880,881 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by Hussey Investments LP
and the 593,000 shares of Class A Common Stock owned by Hussey Endeavors LP.
Total shares listed for individuals includes the beneficial ownership.


                                          36
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 12, 2012

By the Court:

No. 11-1112

JAMES E. KILLIAN, as Independent

Administrator of the Estate of Susan M.

Killian,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CONCERT HEALTH PLAN, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 07 C 4755

Marvin E. Aspen and

Gary S. Feinerman,

Judges.

O R D E R

The petition for rehearing en banc is GRANTED. The panel’s opinion and judgment

previously issued on April 19, 2012, are VACATED.

Oral argument will be set by the court at a date to be determined.
439500 

## • 

# - - . 

# - o o 

### "



# •**~** 

# .- • • 

# 'I 

# , 11**IJl.~:** 

# r 1 } 

# • fl' 

# • 

# , J 

# ,'':1. 

# 1 •

•



# . . . 

# - 

# --- LEGEM) APPROXIIIIAlE PROPERTY BOUNDARY 

# """"SS""" PROPOSED EXCAVATION UMITS v77/777/71l7771 PROPOSED CAWU UMITS I o ' • 0 

## • 

# . :

# . •



# •**IC~**



### o 100 200 

## "'0 

# - 

# - FEEl" 

# _. - -



# - I ISSUED ON ..... Y 2010 CQRAEC11W: WEASlIIES M'l..BENTAlIDN DESlQN 1C[WIEItS INC. FAaUTY FI..OIENC£, SCUlH CARDUNA AElIIAl PHom LOCAllari !liN' 

### Co1
#### § 779.300 Purpose of subpart.

Subpart C of this part has discussed the various criteria for determining coverage under the Act of employers and employees in enterprises and establishments that make retail sales of goods and services. This subpart deals primarily with the exemptions from the Act's minimum wage and overtime provisions found in section 13(a) (2), (4), (11), and 13(b)(18) for employees of retail or service establishments. Also discussed are some exemptions for special categories of establishments engaged in retailing goods or services, which do not require for exemption that the particular establishment be a retail or service establishment as defined in the Act. If all the requirements set forth in any of these exemptions are met, to the extent provided therein the employer is relieved from complying with the minimum wage and/or overtime provisions of the Act even though his employees are engaged in interstate or foreign commerce or in the production of goods for such commerce or employed in covered enterprises.
##### 



Supplemental Retirement Plan  for Donald W. Bogus
  1)
    
    On Mr. Bogus first day of employment, and on each anniversary of that date thereafter, 500
phantom shares of Lubrizol stock will be credited to a supplemental retirement account on Mr.
Bogus behalf.
 2)
    
    If Mr. Bogus works until age 65, over the 12 year period a total of 6,000 phantom shares
would be credited to the account.
 3)
    
    Dividends on accumulated phantom shares will be posted throughout the year and will be used
as the basis for purchasing additional phantom shares under the plan.
 4)
    
    In the event of a change in control, as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement, or at
the time of Mr. Bogus death, Lubrizol would fully credit the account with the remaining
balance of the 6,000 phantom shares.
 5)
    
    In the event of Mr. Bogus death, the account balances will be paid as follows:
   6)
    
    In the event of Mr. Bogus separation from service, the account balances will be paid as
follows:
   7)
    
    Phantom shares accumulated under the plan will be included when considering share ownership
objectives under the Executive Council Ownership Guidelines.
 8)
    
    Amounts may be withheld at the time of distribution for tax purposes. Mr. Bogus, or his
estate, may elect distribution in the form of shares or cash at the time of distribution for
phantom shares that are attributable to deferrals prior April 1, 2004. For phantom shares
that are attributable to deferrals on or after April 1,




---



##### 



2004, the distribution will be a cash amount equal to the number of phantom shares
multiplied by the closing price per common share of The Lubrizol Corporation on the New
York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Reporting System on the date of death or
separation from service.
 9)
    
    As the shares are unregistered, certain restrictions on selling/trading may apply at the time
of distribution.
 10)
    
    The Medicare tax on the increase in the value of the account year over year will be entered
into Mr. Bogus pay on an annual basis.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Anna Voelker, Respondent, against Jos. Rosenberg’s Sons et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Argued September 28, 1937;

decided October 12, 1937.

*566
      *Jeremiah F. Connor*and *William E. Lowther*for appellants.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Chi J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A of part 5 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 5.10 Restitution, criminal action. ( a ) In cases other than those forwarded to the Attorney General of the United States under paragraph (b) of this section where violations of the labor standards clauses contained in § 5.5 and the applicable statutes referenced by § 5.1 result in underpayment of wages to workers or monetary damages caused by violations of § 5.5(a)(11) or (b)(5), the Federal agency or an authorized representative of the Department of Labor will request that restitution be made to such workers or on their behalf to plans, funds, or programs for any type of bona fide fringe benefits within the meaning of 40 U.S.C. 3141(2)(B), including interest from the date of the underpayment or loss. Interest on any back wages or monetary relief provided for in this part will be calculated using the percentage established for the underpayment of taxes under 26 U.S.C. 6621 and will be compounded daily.
( b ) In cases where the Agency Head or the Administrator finds substantial evidence that such violations are willful and in violation of a criminal statute, the matter will be forwarded to the Attorney General of the United States for prosecution if the facts warrant. In all such cases the Administrator will be informed simultaneously of the action taken.
[88 FR 57741, Aug. 23, 2023]
[EXHIBIT 23a TO COLONIAL GAS COMPANY
         FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995]
                         
                                                                           
                                
                                
       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                
                                
           We  have  issued  our reports dated January  17,  1996

accompanying the consolidated financial statements and  schedules

incorporated  by  reference or included in the Annual  Report  on

Form  10-K of Colonial Gas Company and subsidiaries for the  year

ended  December 31, 1995.  We hereby consent to the incorporation

by  reference  of  said  reports  in  the  Colonial  Gas  Company

Registration  Statements on Forms S-8, as amended (File  No.  33-

34068,  File  No. 33-34066, File No. 33-34067 and  File  No.  33-

44427) and Form S-16, as amended on Form S-3 (File No. 2-93005).







                                   GRANT THORNTON LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 1996


            [END OF EXHIBIT 23a TO COLONIAL GAS COMPANY
           FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995]
Definitions
 Code
 Company
 Lubrizol Pension Plan
 Participant
 Plan
 Trust
 Trust Agreement
 Change in Control.
 1




---



##### 



Additional Definitions
   Eligibility
      Amount
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Vesting
   Payment to Participant
   Payment in the Event of Death Prior to Commencement of Distribution
   Authority of the Company
 4




---



##### 



Claims Review Procedure
      5




---



##### 



Non-Alienation of Retirement Rights or Benefits
 Plan Non-Contractual
 Trust
 Interest of a Participant
 6




---



##### 



Controlling Status
 Claims of Other Persons
 Severability
 Governing Law
 7
§ 570.62 Occupations involved in the operation of bakery machines (Order 11). ( a ) *Finding and declaration of fact.* The following occupations involved in the operation of power-driven bakery machines are particularly hazardous for the employment of minors between 16 and 18 years of age: ( 1 ) The occupations of operating, assisting to operate, or setting up, adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning any horizontal or vertical dough mixer; batter mixer; bread dividing, rounding, or molding machine; dough brake; dough sheeter; combination bread slicing and wrapping machine; or cake cutting band saw.
( 2 ) The occupation of setting up or adjusting a cookie or cracker machine.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) This section shall not apply to the operation, including the setting up, adjusting, repairing, oiling and cleaning, of lightweight, small capacity, portable counter-top power-driven food mixers that are, or are comparable to, models intended for household use. For purposes of this exemption, a lightweight, small capacity mixer is one that is not hardwired into the establishment's power source, is equipped with a motor that operates at no more than 1 ⁄ 2 horsepower, and is equipped with a bowl with a capacity of no more than five quarts. *Except,* this exception shall not apply when the mixer is used, with or without attachments, to process meat or poultry products as prohibited by § 570.61(a)(4).
( 2 ) This section shall not apply to the operation of pizza-dough rollers, a type of dough sheeter, that: have been constructed with safeguards contained in the basic design so as to prevent fingers, hands, or clothing from being caught in the in-running point of the rollers; have gears that are completely enclosed; and have microswitches that disengage the machinery if the backs or sides of the rollers are removed. This exception applies only when all the safeguards detailed in this paragraph are present on the machine, are operational, and have not been overridden. This exception does not apply to the setting up, adjusting, repairing, oiling or cleaning of such pizza-dough rollers.
[17 FR 5610, June 21, 1952, as amended at 25 FR 9849, Oct. 14, 1960. Redesignated at 28 FR 1634, Feb. 21, 1963, and amended at 28 FR 3449, Apr. 9, 1963. Redesignated and amended at 36 FR 25156, Dec. 29, 1971; 75 FR 28456, May 20, 2010]
#### § 779.223 Control where ownership vested in individual or single organization.

Ownership, sufficient to exercise “control,” of course, exists where total ownership is vested in a single person, family unit, partnership, corporation, or other single business organization. Ownership sufficient to exercise “control” exist also where there is more than 50 percent ownership of voting stock. (See *West* v. *Wal-Mart,* 264 F. Supp. 168 (W.D. Ark.).) But “control” may exist with much more limited ownership, and, in certain cases exists in the absence of any ownership. The mere ownership of stock in a corporation does not by itself establish the existence of the “control” referred to in the definition. The question whether the ownership in a particular case includes the right to exercise the requisite “control” will necessarily depend upon all the facts in the light of the statutory provisions.
Order entered March 6, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00186

- CV

IN RE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIV E SERVICES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Tex as

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 13467



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the co sts of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE