alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1985.100 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This Part sets forth procedures for, and interpretations of, the employee protection provision of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Section 1057 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA or the Act), Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376, 1955 (July 21, 2010) (codified at 12 U.S.C. 5567). CFPA provides for employee protection from retaliation because the employee has engaged in protected activity pertaining to the offering or provision of consumer financial products or services.
( b ) This part establishes procedures under CFPA for the expeditious handling of retaliation complaints filed by employees, or by persons acting on their behalf. These rules, together with those codified at 29 CFR part 18, set forth the procedures under CFPA for submission of complaints, investigations, issuance of findings and preliminary orders, objections to findings and orders, litigation before administrative law judges (ALJs), post-hearing administrative review, and withdrawals and settlements. In addition, these rules provide the Secretary's interpretations on certain statutory issues.
#### § 452.99 Notice of election.

Elections required by title IV to be held by secret ballot must be preceded by a notice of election mailed to each member at his last known home address not less than fifteen days prior to the election.[48] For purposes of computing the fifteen day period, the day on which the notices are mailed is not counted whereas the day of the election is counted. For example, if the election is to be held on the 20th day of the month, the notices must be mailed no later than the 5th day. The notice must include a specification of the date, time and place of the election and of the offices to be filled, and it must be in such form as to be reasonably calculated to inform the members of the impending election. Specification of the offices to be filled would not be necessary if it is a regular, periodic election of all officers and the notice so indicates. A statement in the union bylaws that an election will be held at a certain time does not constitute the notice required by the statute. Since the Act specifies that the notice must be mailed, other means of transmission such as posting on a bulletin board or hand delivery will not satisfy the requirement. A notice of election must be sent to every member as defined in section 3(o) of the Act, not only to members who are eligible to vote in the election. Where the notice, if mailed to the last known permanent or legal residence of the member, would not be likely to reach him because of a known extended absence from that place, the statutory phrase “last known home address” may reasonably be interpreted to refer to the last known temporary address of definite duration. A single notice for both nominations and election may be used if it meets the requirements of both such notices.[49]

[38 FR 18324, July 9, 1973, as amended at 63 FR 33780, June 19, 1998]

###### Footnotes -
  452.99

[48] Act, sec. 401(e).

[49] See § 452.56 for a discussion of the requirements for notices of nomination.
#### § 779.407 Learners other than “student-learners”.

Regulations have been issued in accordance with the authority in section 14 of the Act to provide for employment under special certificates of learners at wages lower than the minimum wage applicable under section 6 of the Act. Part 522 of this chapter contains the general regulations for learners and those for learners in particular industries. General learner regulations are set forth in §§ 522.1 to 522.11 of this chapter.
§ 570.57 Exposure to radioactive substances and to ionizing radiations (Order 6). ( a ) *Finding and declaration of fact.* The following occupations involving exposure to radioactive substances and to ionizing radiations are particularly hazardous and detrimental to health for minors between 16 and 18 years of age: ( 1 ) Any work in any workroom in which ( i ) radium is stored or used in the manufacture of self-luminous compound,
( ii ) self-luminous compound is made, processed, or packaged,
( iii ) self-luminous compound is stored, used, or worked upon,
( iv ) incandescent mantles are made from fabric and solutions containing thorium salts, or are processed or packaged,
( v ) other radioactive substances are present in the air in average concentrations exceeding 10 percent of the maximum permissible concentrations in the air recommended for occupational exposure by the National Committee on Radiation Protection, as set forth in the 40-hour week column of table one of the National Bureau of Standards Handbook No. 69 entitled “Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Radionuclides in Air and in Water for Occupational Exposure,” issued June 5, 1959.
( 2 ) Any other work which involves exposure to ionizing radiations in excess of 0.5 rem per year.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section: ( 1 ) The term *self-luminous compound* shall mean any mixture of phosphorescent material and radium, mesothorium, or other radioactive element;
( 2 ) The term *workroom* shall include the entire area bounded by walls of solid material and extending from floor to ceiling;
( 3 ) The term *ionizing radiations* shall mean alpha and beta particles, electrons, protons, neutrons, gamma and X-ray and all other radiations which produce ionizations directly or indirectly, but does not include electromagnetic radiations other than gamma and X-ray.
[22 FR 3657, May 24, 1957, as amended at 26 FR 8885, Sept. 21, 1961. Redesignated at 28 FR 1634, Feb. 21, 1963, and amended at 28 FR 3449, Apr. 9, 1963. Redesignated and amended at 36 FR 25156, Dec. 29, 1971]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 170 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Child Care Worthy Wage 

Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2007 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. KERRY, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. 

FEINGOLD, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. DODD) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Child Care 

Worthy Wage Day. 

Whereas approximately 63 percent of the Nation’s children 

under 5 are in nonparental care during part or all of the 

day while their parents work; 

Whereas the early care and education industry employs more 

than 2,300,000 workers; 

Whereas these workers indirectly add $580,000,000,000 to 

the economy by enabling millions of parents to perform 

their own jobs; 

Whereas the average salary of early care and education workers is $18,180 per year, and only 1⁄3 of these workers 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 170 IS 

have health insurance and even fewer have a pension 

plan; 

Whereas the quality of early care and education programs is 

directly linked to the quality of early childhood educators; 

Whereas the turnover rate of early childhood program staff 

is roughly 30 percent per year, and low wages and lack 

of benefits, among other factors, make it difficult to retain high quality educators who have the consistent, caring relationships with young children that are important 

to the children’s development; 

Whereas the compensation of early childhood program staff 

should be commensurate with the importance of the job 

of helping the young children of the Nation develop their 

social, emotional, physical, and cognitive skills, and helping them to be ready for school; 

Whereas providing adequate compensation to early childhood 

program staff should be a priority, and resources can be 

allocated to improve the compensation of early childhood 

educators to ensure that quality care and education are 

accessible for all families; 

Whereas additional training and education for the early care 

and education workforce is critical to ensuring high-quality early learning environments; 

Whereas child care workers should receive compensation commensurate with such training and experience; and 

Whereas the Center for the Child Care Workforce, a project 

of the American Federation of Teachers Educational 

Foundation, with support from the National Association 

for the Education of Young Children and other early 

childhood organizations, recognizes May 1 as National 

Child Care Worthy Wage Day: Now, therefore, be it 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•SRES 170 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 1, 2007, as National Child 

3 Care Worthy Wage Day; and 

4 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

5 observe National Child Care Worthy Wage Day by 

6 honoring early childhood care and education staff 

7 and programs in their communities. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics 

This is to announce the appointment of members to the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee (FESAC), established under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (Public Law 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 6(c)). The membership of the Committee is as follows: 

Professor Ernst R. Berndt, Chair, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 

Dr. Barry P. Bosworth, Brookings Institution 

Professor Franklin M. Fisher, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 

Professor John C. Haltiwanger, University of Maryland 

Dr. Sallie Keller-McNulty, Los Alamos National Laboratory 

Professor Alan B. Krueger, Princeton University 

Dr. Judith T. Lessler, Research Triangle Institute 

Professor Lisa M. Lynch, Tufts University 

Professor Joseph Sedransk, Case Western Reserve University 

Professor Matthew D. Shapiro , University of Michigan 

Professor John B. Taylor, Stanford University 

Professor Kirk M. Wolter, University of Chicago

The Committee will present advice and make recommendations to the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census (the Agencies) from the perspective of the professional economics and statistics communities. The Committee is a technical committee composed of economists, statisticians, and behavioral scientists who are recognized for their attainments and objectivity in their respective fields. Committee members will be called upon to analyze the issues involved in producing Federal economic statistics and recommend practices that will lead to optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and cooperation among the Agencies. These initial appointments are for one-, two- or three-year terms, to provide staggered three-year terms overall. Professor Ernst R. Berndt will serve as Committee Chairperson. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of May 2000.

Katharine G. Abraham,

Commissioner of Labor Statistics.

[FR Doc. 00-13249 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
#### § 778.2 Coverage and exemptions not discussed.

This part 778 does not deal with the general coverage of the Act or various specific exemptions provided in the statute, under which certain employees within the general coverage of the wage and hours provisions are wholly or partially excluded from the protection of the Act's minimum-wage and overtime-pay requirements. Some of these exemptions are self-executing; others call for definitions or other action by the Administrator. Regulations and interpretations relating to general coverage and specific exemptions may be found in other parts of this chapter.
§ 780.504 Basic conditions of exemption. Under section 13(a)(14) of the Act all the following conditions must be met in order for the exemption to apply to an employee: ( a ) He must work on “shade-grown tobacco.”
( b ) He must be an “agricultural employee” employed “in the growing and harvesting” of shade-grown tobacco.
( c ) He must be engaged “in the processing * * * of such tobacco” and this processing must be both “prior to the stemming process” and to prepare the tobacco “for use as cigar wrapper tobacco.” These requirements are discussed in the foIlowing sections of this subpart.
EXHIBIT 21
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MACDERMID, INCORPORATED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

MacDermid's principal, wholly-owned, subsidiaries are as follows:


<S>                                        <C>
                                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                                           -----------------------------
Ferwell SRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Italy
Jager Juene, S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . .  France
MacDermid, plc. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  United Kingdom
MacDermid Asia, Ltd . . . . . . . . . . .  Hong Kong
MacDermid Benelux BV. . . . . . . . . . .  Holland
MacDermid Canning . . . . . . . . . . . .  Texas
MacDermid Canning, ltd. . . . . . . . . .  United Kingdom
MacDermid Chemicals, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Canada
MacDermid Colorspan, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Delaware
MacDermid Equipment, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Connecticut
MacDermid Equipment Asia Ltd. . . . . . .  Taiwan
MacDermid Equipment GmbH. . . . . . . . .  Germany
MacDermid Espanola, S.A.. . . . . . . . .  Spain
MacDermid France, S.A.. . . . . . . . . .  France
MacDermid GmbH. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Germany
MacDermid Printing Solutions, llc.. . . .  Delaware
MacDermid Graphic Arts, SAS.. . . . . . .  France
MacDermid Hong Kong, Ltd. . . . . . . . .  Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Asia . . . .  Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Europe BV. .  Holland
MacDermid Italiana SRL. . . . . . . . . .  Italy
MacDermid New Zealand, Ltd. . . . . . . .  New Zealand
MacDermid Scandinavia . . . . . . . . . .  Sweden
MacDermid Singapore, Pte. Ltd.. . . . . .  Singapore
MacDermid Suisse, S.A.. . . . . . . . . .  Switzerland
MacDermid Taiwan, Ltd.. . . . . . . . . .  Taiwan
Napp Systems Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . .  California
Nippon MacDermid Co., Ltd . . . . . . . .  Japan
PTI Productos Technicos Para Impessao Ltd  Brazil
<FN>

In addition, the Corporation has several non-operating subsidiaries, which, in
the aggregate, are not significant.
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6108
HAZEL TERESA MILLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WENDY HOBBS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-550-R) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hazel Teresa Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), as time barred. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Hobbs , No. CA97-550-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Ashley R. and Another, Children Alleged to be Abused. Jeffrey R., Appellant; Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

Submitted May 20, 1996;

decided June 13, 1996

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *915
      *sua sponte,*upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).
```

[Federal Register: July 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 146)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 44881]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30jy10-1]                         

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================

[[Page 44881]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Part 301

[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0035]

 
Black Stem Rust; Additions of Rust-Resistant Varieties

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 25, 2010, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
Service published a direct final rule. (See 75 FR 29191-29193.) The 
direct final rule notified the public of our intention to amend the 
black stem rust quarantine and regulations by adding 21 varieties to 
the list of rust-resistant Berberis species or cultivars and 2 
varieties to the list of rust-resistant Mahonia species or cultivars in 
the regulations. We did not receive any written adverse comments or 
written notice of intent to submit adverse comments in response to the 
direct final rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the direct final rule is 
confirmed as July 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Prakash K. Hebbar, National 
Program Manager, Black Stem/Barberry Rust Program, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 
River Road Unit 26, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-5717.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, 
and 371.3.
    Section 301.75-15 issued under Sec. 204, Title II, Public Law 106-
113, 113 Stat. 1501A-293; sections 301.75-15 and 301.75-16 issued under 
Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law 106-224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 
note).
    Done in Washington, DC, this 27th day of July 2010.

Kevin Shea
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-18756 Filed 7-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-S
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                            LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth C. Donahey,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2003
                                            /s/Kenneth C. Donahey
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Kenneth C. Donahey
                                            Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and President

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. Such
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 779.353 Basis for classification.

The general principles governing the application of the 13(a)(2) and 13(a)(4) exemptions are explained in detail earlier in the subpart. It is the purpose of the following sections to show how these principles apply to establishments in certain specific industries. In these industries the Divisions have made special studies, held hearings or consulted with representatives of industry and labor, to ascertain the facts. Based upon these facts the following determinations have been made as to which sales or establishments are, and which are not, recognized as retail in the particular industry.
§ 779.237 Enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce. Under section 3(s) the “enterprise” to be covered must be an “enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” This is defined in section 3(s) as follows: Enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce means an enterprise which has employees engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, including employees handling, selling or otherwise working on goods that have been moved in or produced for commerce by any person * * *.
In order for an enterprise to come within the coverage of the Act, it must, therefore, be established that the enterprise has some employees who are: ( a ) Engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, including
( b ) Employees handling, selling or otherwise working on goods that have been moved in or produced for commerce by any person.
The legislative history of the 1966 amendments does not indicate a difference between the meaning of the above wording and the wording used in the prior Act. (See § 779.22.) For a complete discussion of the employees who come within the quoted language see subpart B of the Interpretative Bulletin on general coverage, part 776 of this chapter.
EGU MACT -- Additional interagency comments on preamble 

 12/15/2011 05:19 PM 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

Attached are additional interagency comments that came in this afternoon. 

As you’ll note, many of them were included in the initial comments and 

it’s not clear that they’ve been addressed. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

Comments to MATS Final Rule (12-15-11) under EO13563.docx