alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Floods of May 1951 in western Oklahoma and northwestern Texas

By: J. V. B. Wells

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1227B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 4.172 Meeting requirements for particular fringe benefits—in general.

Where a fringe benefit determination specifies the amount of the employer's contribution to provide the benefit, the amount specified is the actual minimum cash amount that must be provided by the employer for the employee. No deduction from the specified amount may be made to cover any administrative costs which may be incurred by the contractor in providing the benefits, as such costs are properly a business expense of the employer. If prevailing fringe benefits for insurance or retirement are determined in a stated amount, and the employer provides such benefits through contribution in a lesser amount, he will be required to furnish the employee with the difference between the amount stated in the determination and the actual cost of the benefits which he provides. Unless otherwise specified in the particular wage determination, such as one reflecting collectively bargained fringe benefit requirements, issued pursuant to section 4(c) of the Act, every employee performing on a covered contract must be furnished the fringe benefits required by that determination for all hours spent working on that contract up to a maximum of 40 hours per week and 2,080 (i.e., 52 weeks of 40 hours each) per year, as these are the typical number of nonovertime hours of work in a week, and in a year, respectively. Since the Act's fringe benefit requirements are applicable on a contract-by-contract basis, employees performing on more than one contract subject to the Act must be furnished the full amount of fringe benefits to which they are entitled under each contract and applicable wage determination. Where a fringe benefit determination has been made requiring employer contributions for a specified fringe benefit in a stated amount per hour, a contractor employing employees part of the time on contract work and part of the time on other work, may only credit against the hourly amount required for the hours spent on the contract work, the corresponding proportionate part of a weekly, monthly, or other amount contributed by him for such fringe benefits or equivalent benefits for such employees. If, for example, the determination requires health and welfare benefits in the amount of 30 cents an hour and the employer provides hospitalization insurance for such employees at a cost of $10.00 a week, the employer may credit 25 cents an hour ($10.00 ÷ 40) toward his fringe benefit obligation for such employees. If an employee works 25 hours on the contract work and 15 hours on other work, the employer cannot allocate the entire $10.00 to the 25 hours spent on contract work and take credit for 30 cents per hour in that manner, but must spread the cost over the full forty hours.
##### 



WITNESSETH
         A.
    
    The Company will require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by
purchase, merger, consolidation, reorganization or otherwise) to all or substantially
all of the business and/or assets of the Company, by agreement in form and substance
satisfactory to the Executive, expressly to assume and agree to perform this
Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent the Company would be required to
perform if no such succession had taken place. This Agreement will be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the Company and any successor to the Company, including
without limitation any persons acquiring directly or indirectly all or substantially
all of the business and/or assets of the Company whether by purchase, merger,
consolidation, reorganization or otherwise (and such successor will thereafter be
deemed the Company for the purposes of this Agreement), but will not otherwise be
assignable, transferable or delegable by the Company.
 B.
    
    This Agreement inures to the benefit of and is enforceable by the
Executives personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors,
heirs, distributees and/or legatees.




---



##### 



C.
    
    This Agreement is personal in nature and neither of the parties hereto will,
without the consent of the other, assign, transfer or delegate this Agreement or any
rights or obligations hereunder except as expressly provided in Sections 3(A) and (B)
above. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Executives right to
receive the benefits hereunder is not assignable, transferable or delegable, whether
by pledge, creation of a security interest or otherwise, other than by a transfer by
his will or by the laws of descent and distribution and, in the event of any
attempted assignment or transfer contrary to this Section 3(C), the Company has no
liability to pay any amount so attempted to be assigned, transferred or delegated.
 D.
    
    The Company and the Executive recognize that each party will have no
adequate remedy at law for breach by the other of any of the agreements contained
herein and, in the event of any such breach, the Company and the Executive hereby
agree and consent that the other shall be entitled to a decree of specific
performance, mandamus or other appropriate remedy to enforce performance of this
Agreement.
      2




---



##### 



EXECUTIVE
    
    
    
    THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATIONBy:Chief Executive Officer
 3
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed April 2,

reconsideration allowed; opinion (111 Or App 396,823 P2d 1041 (1992)) withdrawn; convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing June 2, 1993

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*ROBERT LARRY SWICEGOOD, *Appellant.*

(10-90-03123D; CA A66096)

852 P2d 282

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Motion for reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing. *State v. Ferrell,*315 Or 213, 843 P2d 939 (1992).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6108

HAZEL TERESA MILLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WENDY HOBBS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-97-550-R)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hazel Teresa Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997), as time barred. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Hobbs, No. CA97-550-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### §§ 2706.131-2706.139 [Reserved]
GDRE>0\5 V 

TELEPHONE 

COOPKRATIVE . INC . 

•i•PARTM^NTO^ 

'•A:;CPORTATION 

v-rr;p£RAT!0rJ3 

••^ 1^5^ 

SlO-110114-018 

CONTROL NO 

Januaiy 13,2011 

Hon. Bay LaHood, Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

R£: CoDtinuatioD of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wraogell, 

and Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4S99 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express our stnmg support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide 

e^endal air service to our communis. Tbe daily jet service Alaska currently int>vides to C<»dova is 

critical for the continued access and economic well being our community requires as well as that of this 

entire region of the state. Jet service is what sets Cordova apart from other rural areas and makes us a viable 

community. 

Alaska's current pattern of service, using jet aircraft, meets crucial needs that would be difGcuh, if not 

impossible, to meet with any other t>pe of service or aircrafl type: 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, with 

single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can 

access the airline's extensive route system and benefit marketing relationships with other carriers. 

The 737-400 combmalion passenger and cai^o aircraft, %Wiich Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using 

on this route, provides freight, mail and caigo capacity that a non-jet canier simply cannot provide. 

Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required Navigation Ferfonnance Technology 

precision technology, which enables the airline to reliabfy access the airport during inclem^t weather, thus 

reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enablli^ people and products to dependably reach Ae 

community. In sunt Alaska's jet service is critical to the economic well being of our commimity. 

For these reasons^ we respectfbUy urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air 

service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done for more than thirty years. 

Smcerely, 

Paul Kelly, 

General Manager/CEO 

c: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVay. Chie^ EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean PameiU Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Dept of Transportation & Public Facilities 

PO Bur 4Sg 

CordOvA, AK 89674 

Phone: gQ7 424 2345 

Fw:gD7 42A 2344
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip navigation
  ADA HomeADA HistoryPart One: Origins of the ADAPart Two: Crafting the LawPart Three: The ADA Becomes LawAchieving the PromiseTools and TechHealth CareLearn, Work and PlayReal People
 Home
          ADA
          Health Care
 Accessible ScalesStepping on a scale and getting your weight is a regular part of many doctor or hospital visits. However, most scales are designed for use while...
                  Electronic Health RecordsPeople with disabilities often work with a variety of medical and community providers. In the best-case scenario, these providers work together as a...
                  Bioethics and equal access to healthcareThe idea that every individual’s life has value is fundamental to the work of medical professionals. Yet too often, biases and misconceptions about...
          Accessibility Standards for Medical Diagnostic EquipmentCompared to people without disabilities, people with disabilities are less likely to receive cancer screenings and preventive care, have higher rates...
                  Oral healthOral health care—which includes care for your teeth, gums, throat, and the bones around the mouth—is critical to overall health. People with...
                  Training The WorkforcePeople with disabilities are more likely to need health care services. The Americans with Disabilities Act has helped more people with disabilities...
          TelehealthIn-person medical appointments can present unique challenges for people with disabilities, particularly if they live far from the health providers or...
                  Art therapy bus serves clients of all abilitiesLisa Lounsbury used ADA guidelines to ensure her mobile art therapy practice can serve clients of all abilities
After searching for the perfect...
 Back to Top    More on the ADA
  

        
      ACL's 31st Anniversary of the ADA page
                      ADA.gov
                      ADA National Network
                      #ThanksToTheADA campaignSITE SUPPORT
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Contact Us
                      Disclaimers
                      Freedom of Information Act
                      Privacy policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers and PlayersRELATED SITES
  

        
      Administration for Community Living
                      HHS Office for Civil Rights
                      Department of Health and Human Services
                      CMS: Access to Care
                      No Fear Act (on HHS.gov)
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      White House
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Christopher J. Spencer, of Wizzard Software Corporation (the "small business issuer"), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:5/14/07/s/ Christopher J. SpencerChristopher J. Spencer    Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 452.59 Presence of nominee.

A requirement that members must be present at the nomination meeting in order to be nominated for office might be considered unreasonable in certain circumstances; for example, in the absence of a provision for an alternative method under which a member who is unavoidably absent from the nomination meeting may be nominated, such a restriction might be regarded as inconsistent with the requirement in section 401(e) that there be a reasonable opportunity to nominate and to be a candidate.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 21 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 21

 Recognizing the uncommon valor of Wesley Autrey of New York, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2007

  Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            January 25, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

                            January 26, 2007

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the uncommon valor of Wesley Autrey of New York, New York.

Whereas Wesley Autrey is a citizen of New York, New York;
Whereas Wesley Autrey is a veteran of the United States Navy;
Whereas Wesley Autrey has been a member in good standing of the Construction and 
        General Building Laborers' Local 79 since 1996;
Whereas Wesley Autrey witnessed a fellow subway passenger suffer from a seizure 
        and fall onto the train tracks;
Whereas Wesley Autrey was compelled by his belief that he should ``do the right 
        thing'' and serve as an example to his 2 young daughters;
Whereas Wesley Autrey demonstrated uncommon valor and tremendous bravery in 
        diving onto the train tracks to save the life of his fellow subway 
        passenger only moments before an incoming train passed over them;
Whereas the beneficiary of Wesley Autrey's courageous actions is now recovering 
        at St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York;
Whereas Wesley Autrey has conducted himself with the utmost humility in the 
        midst of his newfound fame; and
Whereas Wesley Autrey stands out as an example of selflessness to members of his 
        community, his State, and the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes that Wesley Autrey acted heroically by 
        putting his own life at risk to save that of his fellow 
        citizen; and
            (2) expresses its deep appreciation for Wesley Autrey's 
        example and the values that his actions represent.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                       658
<INVENTORY>                                     44,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,233
<PP&E>                                          39,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,359
<BONDS>                                          2,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,552
<SALES>                                        179,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,162
<CGS>                                          149,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,074)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,160)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>