alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7188
WILLIAM CLINTON BLASSINGAME, Petitioner - Appellant, versusMICHAEL MOORE, Director; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-3020-08BD) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Clinton Blassingame, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Blassingame v. Moore , No. CA-96-3020-08BD (D.S.C. July 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Joseph Jackson, Respondent.

Submitted October 2, 1995;

decided October 24, 1995

Motion to dismiss the appeal herein granted and the appeal dismissed as moot.
EXHIBIT 32(a)



Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, John Aglialoro, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |                                                    
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ John Aglialoro                                 
|                      |  |  |  | John Aglialoro Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
August 20, 2015

Mr. Jeff Fierberg

2724 Lafayette Street

Denver, CO 80205

Dear Mr. Fierberg:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your exemption request, posted to the public docket on March 24, 2015, filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−0731, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00028-CR

RODERICK UNDREA WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1323472

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roderick Undrea Williams, appellant, has submitted to the trial court a personal letter 

requesting dismissal of his appeal in this matter. The letter was submitted to this Court as part of 

the clerk’s record, and we view the letter as the clearest possible expression of Williams’ desire 

to dismiss this appeal. As authorized by Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

we grant Williams’ request. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: September 2, 2014

Date Decided: September 3, 2014

Do Not Publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7278

LEONARD PAUL CIRINCIONE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-328-AW) Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Allen Nathans, Jason D. Tulley, BENNETT & NATHANS, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leonard Paul Cirincione appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Cirincione v. Smith , No. CA-99- 328-AW (D. Md. July 30, 1999). We grant Cirincione’s motion tofile a supplemental brief and have considered his brief in reviewing this appeal. We deny Cirincione’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Triad Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James D. Shelton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JAMES D. SHELTON   
|James D. Shelton       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 5, 2006            

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARSHALL INDUSTRIES ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,003)
<INVENTORY>                                    284,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               469,051
<PP&E>                                          81,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                (44,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,616
<OTHER-SE>                                     332,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,673
<SALES>                                      1,184,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,184,604
<CGS>                                          988,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  988,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,370
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,197)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,503
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for a Director-General in DG Joint Research Centre (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) COM/R/7022/04

(Official Journal of the European Union C 234 A of 21 September 2004)

(2004/C 252 A/11)

On page 41, ‘Appointment and conditions of employment’:

for:

‘The Director General will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. A shortlist of candidates will be called for an interview by the Commission's Consultative Committee on Appointments and an assessment centre run by external recruitment consultants.

Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*15 grade officials of the European Communities.

Applicants should note the requirement under the Staff Regulations for all new staff to complete successfully a nine-month probationary period.’

read:

‘The Director General will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. A shortlist of candidates will be called for an interview by the Commission's Consultative Committee on Appointments and the Board of Governors of the JRC and an assessment centre run by external recruitment consultants.

Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*15 grade officials of the European Communities.

Applicants should note the requirement under the Staff Regulations for all new staff to complete successfully a nine-month probationary period.’

----
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pick-Ups Plus (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date August 19, 2005                    By: /s/ Robert White
                                            -----------------------------------
                                        Name:  Robert White
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. and
will be retained by Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       20
Incentive Compensation Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12.1 

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION AWARD 
 AGREEMENT 
 This Incentive Compensation Award Agreement (this
“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this 1st day of April, 2012, by and between Conn’s Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Conn’s”), and Theodore M. Wright, an individual (the
“Executive”). 
 1. The Executive and Conn’s agree that Executive shall be eligible to receive a
cash bonus (the “Incentive Compensation”) following the close of the 2013 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter for which Executive continues his employment with Conn’s (each such fiscal year, a
“Performance Period”), subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
 2. Within 90 days after
the commencement of each Performance Period the Compensation Committee shall establish in writing the objective formula for determining the Incentive Compensation for such Performance Period using one or more of the following performance measures
applied with respect to Conn’s or any affiliate or division of Conn’s: (a) total revenues or any component thereof; (b) operating income, pre-tax or after-tax income, EBITA, EBITDA or net income; (c) cash flow, free cash
flow or net cash from operations; (d) earnings per share; (e) value of the Conn’s stock or total return to stockholders; and (f) any combination of any or all of the foregoing criteria, in each case on an absolute or relative
basis. 
 3. The Compensation Committee shall, promptly after the date on which all necessary financial or other information for
a particular Performance Period becomes available, certify (a) the degree to which each of the performance measures has been attained and (b) the amount of the Incentive Compensation, if any, payable to the Executive. Such amount shall be
paid to the Executive not later than thirty (30) days following such certification. 
  
 4. The Incentive Compensation for any Performance Period may not exceed $1,920,000. 
 5. No Incentive Compensation shall be paid to the Executive for a Performance Period if the Executive is not employed by Conn’s on the last day of such Performance Period. 

6. The Executive and Conn’s agree that the Incentive Compensation is intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based
compensation” within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e). 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE
FOLLOWS] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
written above. 
  

									
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	CONN’S, INC.
				
	 /s/ Theodore M. Wright
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Sydney K. Boone, Jr.

	Theodore M. Wright	 		 	 Sydney K. Boone, Jr.

Corporate General Counsel
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 0678 Dir ID: 2013 - NM - 207 - AD
AFS-12-327-E May 10, 2012

Exemption No. 10533 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0443

Ms. Glenda Davis

Parent of Matthew Davis

42 Acom Lane Lumberton, MS 39455

Dear Ms. Davis:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received April 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Matthew Davis for an exempti on from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That ex emption, if granted, would allow Matthew to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Matthew.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using2

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Matthew Davis exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Matthew is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Matthew to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Matthew’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Matthew Davis may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Matthew’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.27

                                PROMISSORTY NOTE
                                                          Baltimore, Maryland 
                                                          November __, 1996

                  For value received, LUNN INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation, and ALCORE, INC., a Delaware corporation (collectively, the
"Borrower"), jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of FIRST UNION
NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND, a national banking association (the "Bank"), the
unpaid principal amount of each Loan made by the Bank to the Borrower (and/or
either of them) pursuant to the Credit Agreement referred to below on the
maturity date provided for in the Credit Agreement. The Borrower promises to pay
interest on the unpaid principal amount of each such Loan on the dates and at
the rate or rates provided for in the Credit Agreement. All such payments of
principal and interest shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the
Credit Agreement.

                  All Loans made by the Bank and all repayments of the principal
thereof shall be recorded by the Bank and, if the Bank so elects in connection
with any transfer or enforcement hereof, appropriate notations to evidence the
foregoing information with respect to each Loan then outstanding shall be
endorsed by the Bank on the schedule attached to and made a part hereof;
provided that the failure of the Bank to make any such recordation or
endorsement shall not affect the obligations of the Borrower hereunder or under
the Credit Agreement.

                  This note is the Note referred to in the Credit Agreement of
even date herewith, between the Borrower and the Bank (as the same may be
amended from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"). Terms defined in the Credit
Agreement are used herein with the same meanings. Reference is made to the
Credit Agreement for provisions for the mandatory and optional prepayment hereof
and the acceleration of the maturity hereof.

WITNESS/ATTEST:                                      LUNN INDUSTRIES, INC.

____________________                        By __________________________SEAL)
                                               Name: Alan W. Baldwin
                                               Title:  Chief Executive Officer 
                                                       and Chairman

[CORPORATE SEAL]
                                                     ALCORE, INC.

___________________                         By:__________________________(SEAL)

                                               Name: Edward A. Kiley
                                               Title:  President/General Manager

                                    - 1 -