alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13073]



[[Page 33523]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council 
will meet in Salt Lake City, Utah, June 22-24, 2000. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss emerging issues in urban and community forestry.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 22-24, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Little America Hotel & 
Towers, 500 South Main Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. A tour of local 
projects will be held on June 22 from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Individuals who wish to speak at the meeting or to propose agenda 
items must send their names and proposals to Suzanne M. del Villar, 
Executive Assistant, National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory 
Council, 20628 Diane Drive, Sonora, CA 95370.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne M. del Villar, Cooperative 
Forestry Staff, (209) 536-9201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Challenge Cost-Share Grant categories, 
identified by the Council, are advertised annually to solicit proposals 
for projects to advance the knowledge of, and promote interest in, 
urban and community forestry. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), the 
meeting will be closed from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on 
June 24 in order for the Council to determine the categories for the 
2001 Challenge Cost-Share grant program. Otherwise, the meeting is open 
to the public.
    Persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters to 
the attention of the Council may file written statements with the 
Council staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will 
be provided and individuals who made written requests by June 9 will 
have the opportunity to address the Council at those sessions. Council 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members.

    Dated: May 15, 2000.
Dan Glickman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13073 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 4043.8 Confidentiality.

In accordance with section 4043(f) of ERISA and § 4901.21(a) of this chapter, any information or documentary material that is not publicly available and is submitted to PBGC pursuant to subpart B or C of this part will not be made public, except as may be relevant to any administrative or judicial action or proceeding or for disclosures to either body of Congress or to any duly authorized committee or subcommittee of the Congress. This provision does not apply to information or material submitted to PBGC pursuant to subpart D of this part, even where the submission serves as an alternative method of compliance with § 4043.25.

[80 FR 55002, Sept. 11, 2015, as amended at 88 FR 76664, Nov. 7, 2023]
SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA attended the Montana DEQ and USFS REGION 1 a nnual p lanning m eeting on 4 / 12 /16, and provided

a short background and current status on the Forest Roads issue.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0302-22

EX PARTE CAMERON MICHAEL MOON, Appellant

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

The Court grants the State’s petition for discretionary review and also grants the

following ground on its own motion: When Section 54.02(j)(3) of the Family Code speaks

of an “adjudication” and an “adjudication hearing,” does the meaning of those words also

embrace events that might occur in an adult criminal trial, or are their meanings restricted to

the context of juvenile proceedings?

The Clerk of this Court will send copies of this order to the Court of Appeals for the

First District, the State Prosecuting Attorney, the Harris County District Attorney, and

Appellant.
Filed: September 7, 2022

Do not publish
#### § 778.7 Effect of Service Contract Act of 1965.

The McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act of 1965, which provides for the predetermination and the specification in service contracts entered into by the Federal Government or the District of Columbia, of the minimum wages and fringe benefits to be received by employees of contractors and subcontractors employed in work on such contracts, contains the following provision:

Sec. 6. In determining any overtime pay to which such service employees are entitled under any Federal law, the regular or basic hourly rate of pay of such an employee shall not include any fringe benefit payments computed hereunder which are excluded from the regular rate under the Fair Labor Standards Act by provisions of section 7(e)* thereof. (*Subsection designation changed in text from section 7(d) to 7(e) to conform with the relettering enacted by the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1966.)

Where the fringe benefits specified in such a service contract are furnished to an employee, the above provision permits exclusion of such fringe benefits from the employee's regular rate of pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act pursuant to the rules and principles set forth in subpart C of this part 778. However, the McNamara-O'Hara Act permits an employer to discharge his obligation to provide the specified fringe benefits by furnishing any equivalent combinations of bona fide fringe benefits or by making equivalent or differential payments in cash. Permissible methods of doing this are set forth in part 4 of this title, subpart B. If the employer furnishes equivalent benefits or makes cash payments, or both, to an employee as therein authorized, the amounts thereof, to the extent that they operate to discharge the employer's obligation under the McNamara-O'Hara Act to furnish such specified fringe benefits, may be excluded pursuant to such Act from the employee's regular or basic rate of pay in computing any overtime pay due the employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act, pursuant to the rule provided in § 4.55 of this title. This means that such equivalent fringe benefits or cash payments which are authorized under the McNamara-O'Hara Act to be provided in lieu of the fringe benefits specified in determinations issued under such Act are excludable from the regular rate in applying the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act if the fringe benefits specified under the McNamara-O'Hara Act would be so excludable if actually furnished. This is true regardless of whether the equivalent benefits or payments themselves meet the requirements of section 7(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act and subpart C of this part 778.
EXHIBIT 99.11


                                  Amendment No. 3
                                        to
                                Longview Fibre Company
                  Branch Plant Hourly Employees' 401(k) Plan and Trust

     This Amendment is made to the Longview Fibre Company Branch Plant Hourly
Employees' 401(k) Plan and Trust (the "Plan").  The following amendments are
effective as of January 7, 2000.  All terms defined in the Plan shall have
the same meaning when used herein.  All provisions of the Plan not amended by
this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

1. The second paragraph of Section 7.2 is amended as follows:

       , during any Conversion Period, Trust assets may be held in any
       investment vehicle permitted by the Plan, as directed by the
       Administrator, irrespective of prior Participant investment elections.

2. Section 7.5 is amended to read as follows:

7.5 Timing

   A Participant shall provide his or her initial investment election
   upon becoming a Participant and may change his or her election with
   respect to future contributions and/or reallocate his or her existing
   Account balances at such times, in such increments and subject to such
   rules and procedures as the Administrator shall establish.

3. The first sentence of Section 16.4 is amended by adding the following
clause at the end thereof:

       , subject to any rules and procedures established by the Administrator
       pursuant to Section 7.5.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed
on the date indicated below.

                                            LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY

Dated: January 20, 2000                     By: L. J. HOLBROOK
                                                L. J. HOLBROOK
                                            Its: Sr. VP-Finance

TRUSTEE APPROVAL

The Trustee hereby accepts and approves the amendments set forth above.

Dated:                                      MERRILL LYNCH TRUST COMPANY

                                            By:
                                            Its:
#### § 779.24 Retail or service establishment.

In the 1949 amendments to the Act, the term “retail or service establishment”, which was not previously defined in the law, was given a special definition for purposes of the Act. The legislative history of the 1961 and the 1966 amendments to the Act, which use the same term in a number of provisions relating to coverage and exemptions, indicates that no different meaning was intended by the term “retail or service establishment” as used in the new provisions from that already established by the Act's definition. On the contrary, the existing definition was reenacted in section 13(a)(2) of the Act as amended in 1961 and 1966 as follows: “A ‘retail or service establishment’ shall mean an establishment 75 per centum of whose annual dollar volume of sales of goods or services (or of both) is not for resale and is recognized as retail sales or services in the particular industry”. The application of this definition, which has had much judicial construction since its original enactment, is considered at length in subpart D of this part. As is apparent from the quoted language, not every establishment which engages in retail selling of goods or services will constitute a “retail or service establishment” within the meaning of the Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 265 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 265

  Congratulating the St. Mary's College of Maryland sailing team for 
 winning the 2007 Inter-collegiate Sailing Association (ICSA) Women's 
      National Championship and the 2007 ICSA Team Race National 
                             Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2007

   Mr. Cardin (for himself and Ms. Mikulski) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating the St. Mary's College of Maryland sailing team for 
 winning the 2007 Inter-collegiate Sailing Association (ICSA) Women's 
      National Championship and the 2007 ICSA Team Race National 
                             Championship.

Whereas on May 25, 2007, the St. Mary's College of Maryland Lady Seahawks won 
        the 2007 Inter-collegiate Sailing Association (ICSA) Women's National 
        Championship in Norfolk, Virginia;
Whereas the 2007 ICSA Women's National Champions defeated 17 other teams;
Whereas the 2007 ICSA Women's National Champions are Jennifer Chamberlin, Mattie 
        Farrar, Adrienne Patterson, Melissa Pumphrey, and Sara Morgan Watters;
Whereas Adrienne Patterson is the first Lady Seahawk to be named the ICSA Female 
        College Sailor of the Year;
Whereas on May 29, 2007, the St. Mary's College of Maryland Seahawks won the 
        2007 ICSA Team Race National Championship defeating 13 other teams in 
        Annapolis, Maryland;
Whereas the 2007 victory is the fourth ISCA Team Race National Championship and 
        the second Women's National Championship for the St. Mary's College of 
        Maryland Seahawks;
Whereas the 2007 ICSA Team Race National Champions are Jennifer Chamberlin, 
        Myles Gutenkunst, John Howell, Phelps Kelley, Jesse Kirkland, John Loe, 
        Maggie Lumkes, Meredith Nordhem, and Hilary Wiech; and
Whereas the coaches of the 2007 ICSA Women's National Champions and the 2007 
        ICSA Team Race National Champions are Adam Werblow and William Ward: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the St. Mary's College of 
Maryland sailing team for winning the 2007 ICSA Women's and Team Race 
National Championships.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4005-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4005-DR), dated July 20, 2011, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 1, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of a major disaster declaration for the                           ( print page 49782)                        State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 20, 2011.                

Anderson County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2011-20366 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### § 2570.11 Scope of review.

The review of the Secretary shall not be a *de novo* proceeding but rather a review of the record established before the administrative law judge. There shall be no opportunity for oral argument.
(79 South. 879)

#### VINSON v. CITY OF GADSDEN.

(7 Div. 536.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 30, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; J. E. Blackwood, Judge.

W. T. Murphree, of Gadsden, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### State v. Turner, *Appellant.*

1. Criminal Evidence: testimony of prisoner : cross-examination. A defendant in a criminal case testifying in his own behalf, can be cross-examined only as to matters of which he testified in chief. See *State v. McLaughlin, amte,*p. 324.

2. -: evidence of other offenses. It is error upon a criminal trial to permit the State to give evidence of other and distinct offenses committed upon other persons at other times and places.

*Appeal from Randolph Circuit*Court.—Hon. G-. H. Burckeartt, Judge.

Reversed.

*351
      *O. T. Rouse*for appellant.

*D. H. McIntyre,*Attorney General, and *A. H. Waller,*for the State.

Ray, J.

The judgment of the circuit court, in this cause, is reversed and the cause remanded for error committed in allowing the State’s attorney to cross-examine the defendant as to matters and crimes not testified to by him, in his examination in chief. R. S. 1879, § 1918; *State v. McGraw,*74 Mo. 573; *State v. McLaughlin, ante,*p. 324. The case of the *State v. Porter,*75 Mo. 171, is also decisive of this case. This defendant and the said Porter were jointly indicted for the same offense. A severance was had, separate trials took place, resulting in convictions in both cases. The case of Porter Was first tried, while that of defendant was continued to a subsequent term, when he also was convicted upon testimony, in all respects substantially the same. Porter took an appeal to this court where the judgment of the circuit court was reversed and the cause remanded, for the reason, that the State’s attorney was permitted to cross-examine the defendant in relation to matters not testified to by him in his examination in chief. This defendant having also appealed, the same questions are here presented that were considered and decided in the *Porter case.*

In this case, as in the other, it also appears that on the trial and in rebuttal, the State’s attorney was permitted to prove, over the objections of the defendant, other and distinct offenses, committed upon other persons at other times and places. This also was error. 70 Mo. 289; 71 Mo. 419.

Eor these reasons, as before stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.
Clean Automotive Technology... Innovation that Works 

Cooperative Agreement Between Cooperative Agreement Between

EPA’s Office of T ’s Office of Transpor ranspor ransportation and Air Quality and tation and Air Quality and

The University of T The University of Toledo

Title: Collaborative Effort to Refine Hydraulic Hybrid Drivetrains to Optimize Fuel Economy, Emissions, and Performance 

Purpose: Improve and optimize the components of hybrid hydraulic systems for maximizing fuel 

economy and simultaneously minimizing pollutant emissions. This collaborative effort is applicable to 

both light- and heavy-duty vehicles with high-efficiency hydraulic hybrid systems. 

Background: Under its CleanAutomotive Technology program, EPA’s Office of Transportation and 

Air Quality (OTAQ) conducts research in advanced engine and drivetrain technologies to: 

• Reduce greenhouse gases 

• Increase fuel efficiency 

• Achieve low regulated pollutants 

The CleanAutomotive Technology Program develops new advanced technologies for personal and 

commercial vehicles that are clean, fuel efficient, and cost effective. The program intends to encourage 

manufacturers to produce cleaner and more fuel efficient vehicles by overcoming technical obstacles in 

their development. 

EPApartners with universities and industry to further development and to facilitate the commercialization 

of promising technologies. Through these partnerships, EPAactively pursues the transfer of EPA’s 

technologies into the private sector for commercial production. 

Currently Proposed Tasks for the Cooperative Agreement: 

• Improving efficiency of hydraulic hybrid drivetrain components 

• Refining hydraulic hybrid drivetrains for smooth and quiet operation 

• Modeling improvements to hydraulic hybrid operation 

• Training a new generation of engineers with knowledge and skills in advanced automotive 

technology 

Duration & Funding Level of the Cooperative Agreement: The total EPA commitment for 

3 years is up to $449,998. The University of Toledo will provide cost-sharing funds to contribute to 

advancing hydraulic hybrid technology. 

March 2006 

www.epa.gov/otaq/technology EPA420-F-06-030
Exhibit 4.18

Agreement on Termination of Contract

 

Party A: M&G Chenguang Holding (Group) Co., Ltd

 

Party B: Shanghai Shengran Information Technology Co., Ltd.

 

Based on the Lease Contract (hereinafter referred to as the “Master Contract”) made and entered into by and between Party A and Party B, the property located at 14F, Building No.2, No. 1528 Gumei Road, Caohejing Development Zone, Shanghai was leased to Party B as business offices, and the specific building area is 1,798.38m2. The two parties hereto agreed that the lease term shall commence on July 1, 2012 and end on June 30, 2015 and the rents shall accrue as of July 1, 2012. Whereas, Party B wishes to terminate the Master Contract, and Shanghai Xinsheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Taomee Animation Co., Ltd., related companies of Party B, will lease the property under the Master Contract, Party A and Party B will officially terminate the Master Contract on and after February 28, 2015 after a preliminary discussion, and specify related content in the Master Contract for the two parties to implement accordingly.

 

1.         Party B promises that it will pay off relevant expenses on its own and go through property delivery procedures with property management department;

 

2.         Party A promises that it will, after receiving the receipt for the security deposit (¥689,229.14 yuan) from Party B and concluding a Lease Contract with Shanghai Xinsheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Taomee Animation Co., Ltd, issue a receipt for security deposit to the foregoing companies based on the content of the newly executed contract.

 

3.         The execution of this Agreement and the termination of the Master Contract will in no case affect the performance of obligations of any party hereto to keep confidential the trade secrets of the other party.

 

The Agreement shall take effect as soon as the two parties set their hands and seals hereto. The Master Contract mentioned herein will officially terminate as soon as Party A and Party B settle all outstanding rents.

 

The Agreement shall be executed in duplicate. Each party holds one copy respectively and both copies are equally authentic and valid.

 











 

	
Party A:
    	
(Seal)
    	

    	
Party B:
    	
(Seal)
    	

    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
M&G Chenguang Holding (Group) Co., Ltd
    	
Shanghai Shengran   Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Legal (authorized) representative:
    	
Legal (authorized)   representative:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date of signature: January 22, 2015
    	
Date of signature: January 22, 2015