alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 780.115 Forest products.

Trees grown in forests and the lumber derived therefrom are not “agricultural or horticultural commodities.” Christmas trees, whether wild or planted, are also not so considered. It follows that employment in the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of such trees or timber products is not sufficient to bring an employee within section 3(f) unless the operation is performed by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with his or its farming operations. On the latter point, see §§ 780.160 through 780.164 which discuss the question of when forestry or lumbering operations are incident to or in conjunction with farming operations so as to constitute “agriculture.” For a discussion of the exemption in section 13(a)(13) of the Act for certain forestry and logging operations in which not more than eight employees are employed, see part 788 of this chapter.

[74 FR 26014, May 29, 2009]
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 5 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proclaiming Casimir Pulaski to be an honorary citizen of 

the United States posthumously. 

Whereas Casimir Pulaski was a Polish military officer who 

fought on the side of the American colonists against the 

British in the American Revolutionary War; 

Whereas Benjamin Franklin recommended that General 

George Washington accept Casimir Pulaski as a volunteer in the American Cavalry and said that Pulaski was 

‘‘renowned throughout Europe for the courage and bravery he displayed in defense of his country’s freedom’’; 

Whereas after arriving in America, Casimir Pulaski wrote to 

General Washington, ‘‘I came here, where freedom is 

being defended, to serve it, and to live or die for it.’’; 

Whereas the first military engagement of Casimir Pulaski 

with the British was on September 11, 1777, at the Battle of Brandywine, and his courageous charge in this enVerDate Aug 31 2005 19:01 Mar 21, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SJ5.RFH SJ5

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

SJ 5 RFH 

gagement averted a disastrous defeat of the American 

Cavalry and saved the life of George Washington; 

Whereas on September 15, 1777, George Washington elevated Casimir Pulaski to the rank of Brigadier General 

of the American Cavalry; 

Whereas Casimir Pulaski formed the Pulaski Cavalry Legion, 

and in February 1779, this legion ejected the British occupiers from Charleston, South Carolina; 

Whereas in October 1779, Casimir Pulaski mounted an assault against British forces in Savannah, Georgia; 

Whereas on the morning of October 9, 1779, Casimir Pulaski 

was mortally wounded and was taken aboard the American ship USS Wasp, where he died at sea on October 

11, 1779; 

Whereas before the end of 1779, the Continental Congress 

resolved that a monument should be erected in honor of 

Casimir Pulaski; 

Whereas in 1825, General Lafayette laid the cornerstone for 

the Casimir Pulaski monument in Savannah, Georgia; 

and 

Whereas in 1929, Congress passed a resolution recognizing 

October 11 of each year as Pulaski Day in the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

SJ 5 RFH 

1 That Casimir Pulaski is proclaimed to be an honorary cit2 izen of the United States posthumously. 

Passed the Senate March 19, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth C.
Donahey, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 28, 2004 /s/ Kenneth C. DonaheyKenneth C. DonaheyChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 780.102 Pay requirements for agricultural employees.

Section 6(a)(5) of the Act provides that any employee employed in agriculture must be paid at least $1.30 an hour beginning February 1, 1969. However, there are certain exemptions provided in the Act for agricultural workers, as previously mentioned. (See §§ 780.3 and 780.4.)
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007



|I. | Parent Company
|-- | --------------

Lydall, Inc.



|II. | First tier
|--- | ----------

Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Inc.

Lydall Filtration/Separation, Inc.

Lydall Transport, Ltd.

Lydall International, Inc.

Lydall France S.A.S.

Lydall Deutschland Holding GmbH



|III. | Second tier
|---- | -----------

Charter Medical, Ltd.

Lydall Asia Limited

Lydall
Thermal/Acoustical Sales, LLC

Lydall Industrial Thermal Solutions, Inc.

Trident II, Inc.

Lydall Distribution
Services, Inc.

Lydall Express, LLC

Lydall Filtration/Separation S.A.S.

Lydall Thermique/Acoustique S.A.S.

Lydall Gerhardi GmbH & Co. KG



|IV. | Third tier
|--- | ----------

Lydall Industrial Thermal
Sales/Service, LLC

Lydall Gerhardi Verwaltungs GmbH



|V. | Fourth tier
|-- | -----------

Affinity Industries Asia, LLC
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 269 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage stamp be issued in honor of former United States Representative Barbara Jordan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2007 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. MENENDEZ, 

Mr. SPECTER, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. OBAMA, Ms. MIKULSKI, 

Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BIDEN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. DODD, Mrs. BOXER, 

and Ms. LANDRIEU) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens’ Stamp 

Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage stamp 

be issued in honor of former United States Representative Barbara Jordan. 

Whereas, in 1966, Barbara Jordan became the first African 

American since 1883 to serve in the Texas Senate, where 

she served with distinction until 1972; 

Whereas Barbara Jordan became the first African American 

United States Representative from Texas when she won 

election to represent Texas’s 18th District in the United 

States House of Representatives in 1972; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 269 IS 

Whereas, from 1979 to 1996, Barbara Jordan served as a 

distinguished professor at the University of Texas Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, where she also 

held the Lyndon B. Johnson Centennial Chair in National Policy; 

Whereas President Bill Clinton awarded Barbara Jordan the 

Presidential Medal of Freedom, the Nation’s highest civilian honor, in August 1994; and 

Whereas Barbara Jordan was a pioneer whose devotion to 

civil rights for all people in the United States resonates 

to this day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the 

2 Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to 

3 the Postmaster General that a commemorative postage 

4 stamp be issued in honor of former United States Rep5 resentative Barbara Jordan. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
14910-13-Pj

Federal Aviation Administration



# • * 

### * 

# • * 

# • * The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address theunsafe conditi n Interference between the cable and the insulatib~ bag causes the material to bedrawn into the gap between thepulley and the pulley guard. This condition, ifnot detected and corrected, could lead to restricted aileron movement and consequently, reduced control ofthe aeroplane . listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory ontinuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl) originated by an aviation autboJyrf another country to identify andcorrect an unsafe condition on an aviation ProduJ The MeAl describes the unsafi condition as: 

# 1 Three events have been reported where insula'o material was found to be fouling pulleys inthe aileron interconnect 

### dir uit in the cabin roof area. 

### *

## ** SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe product



# Ot/7? [Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier r009-NM-226-ADI RIN 2120-AA64 I Airworthiness Directji;ves;BAE SYSTEMS (operationr) Limited Model BAe 146 an Avrc l46-RJ Airplane AGENCY: Federal A1iation Administration (FAA), DGT. ACTION: Nolice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). DEPARTMENT OF TR>\NSPORTATION 14CFR Part 39

described inthe MeAl. OATF. DATES: We must receive comments onthis proposed 

## mby [INSERT DATE 45
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the Company's 1984 and 1991
Stock Option Plans, filed on April 15, 1993, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed
on January 31, 1997, the Summa ESOP and 401(k) Stock Option Plan, filed on
September 8, 1997, and the Calnetics Stock Option Plan, filed on October 21,
1997, and the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-4 pertaining to
the LexaLite Stock Option Plan, filed on September 9, 1996, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933.


                                                   /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
October 30, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50006

 

PHILIP M. ROSS, doing business as

Urban Wildern, SA; ELIZABETH BURMEISTER,

Individually and as Representative of Class

Members; S. Paul DUBOSE, Individually and as

Representative of Class Members; JOHN

MARTINEZ, Individually and as Representative

of Class Members; CAROLYN LEE OLSEN, 

Individually and as Representative of

Class Members,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS OWNING

3,190 ACRES OF APPLEWHITE WATER SUPPLY

PARCELS,

Plaintiff,

versus

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO; SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM

and SAN ANTONIO DEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

(93 CV 259)

 

September 15, 1995
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.”

Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

2

Before GARWOOD, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Being essentially in agreement with the reasoning of the court

below, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
§ 500.45 Contents of application. The application shall set forth the information required thereon which shall include the following: ( a ) A declaration, subscribed and sworn to by the applicant, stating the applicant's permanent place of residence, the farm labor contracting activities for which the certificate is requested, and the address to which official documents should be mailed;
( b ) A statement identifying each vehicle to be used to transport any migrant or seasonal agricultural worker and, if the vehicle is or will be owned or controlled by the applicant, documentation showing that the applicant for a Farm Labor Contractor Certificate of Registration is in compliance with the requirements of section 401 of the Act with respect to each such vehicle;
( c ) A statement identifying each facility or real property to be used to house any migrant agricultural worker and, if the facility or real property is or will be owned or controlled by the applicant, documentation showing that the applicant for a Farm Labor Contractor Certificate of Registration is in compliance with section 203 of the Act with respect to each such facility or real property;
( d ) A set of fingerprints of the applicant on Form FD 258 as prescribed by the U.S. Department of Justice;
( e ) A declaration, subscribed and sworn to by the applicant, consenting to the designation by a court of the Secretary as an agent available to accept service of summons in any action against the applicant, if the applicant has left the jurisdiction in which the action is commenced or otherwise has become unavailable to accept service; and
( f ) Such other relevant information as the Secretary may require.
#### § 780.127 Hatchery operations.

Hatchery operations incident to the breeding of poultry, whether performed in a rural or urban location, are the “raising of poultry” (*Miller Hatcheries* v. *Boyer,* 131 F. 2d 283). The application of section 3(f) to employees of hatcheries is further discussed in §§ 780.210 through 780.214.
§ 552.102 Live-in domestic service employees. ( a ) Domestic service employees who reside in the household where they are employed are entitled to the same minimum wage as domestic service employees who work by the day. However, section 13(b)(21) provides an exemption from the Act's overtime requirements for domestic service employees who reside in the household where employed. But this exemption does not excuse the employer from paying the live-in worker at the applicable minimum wage rate for all hours worked. In determining the number of hours worked by a live-in worker, the employee and the employer may exclude, by agreement between themselves, the amount of sleeping time, meal time and other periods of complete freedom from all duties when the employee may either leave the premises or stay on the premises for purely personal pursuits. For periods of free time (other than those relating to meals and sleeping) to be excluded from hours worked, the periods must be of sufficient duration to enable the employee to make effective use of the time. If the sleeping time, meal periods or other periods of free time are interrupted by a call to duty, the interruption must be counted as hours worked. See regulations part 785, § 785.23.
( b ) If it is found by the parties that there is a significant deviation from the initial agreement, the parties should reach a new agreement that reflects the actual facts of the hours worked by the employee.
[40 FR 7405, Feb. 20, 1975, as amended at 78 FR 60557, Oct. 1, 2013]
#### § 794.143 Work exempt under another section of the Act.

Where an employee performs work during his workweek, some of which is exempt under one section of the Act, and the remainder of which is exempt under another section or sections, of the Act, the exemptions may be combined. The employee's combination exemption is controlled in such case by that exemption which is narrower in scope. For example, if part of his work is exempt from both minimum wage and overtime compensation under one section of the Act, and the rest is exempt only from the overtime pay requirements by virtue of section 7(b)(3), the employee is exempt that week from the overtime pay provisions, but not from the minimum wage requirements. Similarly, an employee who spends part of his workweek in work which would, if done throughout the week, exempt him completely from the overtime pay requirements, and the remainder of the week in work exempt from such requirements only to the extent and under the conditions specified in section 7(b)(3), could be exempt from overtime pay only to such extent and under such conditions. Thus where an employee spends part of his workweek in transporting petroleum products by tank truck for an employer in an enterprise described in section 7(b)(3), and the remainder of his workweek in driving a taxicab for the employer's taxi business (work exempt from the overtime provisions under section 13(b)(17)), he is eligible for exemption from overtime pay only if he is compensated in such workweek in accordance with the provisions of section 7(b)(3) and only to the extent which that section provides.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATE OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David B. Swank, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify to the
best of my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004,
which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Registrant.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
63 title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.


Date:  November 5,  2004                           /s/ DAVID B. SWANK
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  David B. Swank
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
§ 458.91 Action by the Administrative Review Board. ( a ) After consideration of the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision and order, the record, and any exceptions filed, the Administrative Review Board shall issue its decision affirming or reversing the Administrative Law Judge, in whole, or in part, or making such other disposition of the matter as it deems appropriate: *Provided, however,* That unless exceptions are filed which are timely and in accordance with § 458.89, the Administrative Review Board may, at its discretion, adopt without discussion the recommended decision and order of the Administrative Law Judge, as contained in his recommended decision and order, shall, upon appropriate notice to the parties, automatically become the decision of the Administrative Review Board.
( b ) Upon finding a violation of the CSRA, FSA or this part, the Administrative Review Board may order respondent to cease and desist from such violative conduct and may require the respondent to take such affirmative action as it deems appropriate to effectuate the policies of the CSRA or FSA.
( c ) Upon finding no violation of the CSRA, FSA or this part, the Administrative Review Board shall dismiss the complaint.
[78 FR 8027, Feb. 5, 2013]
§ 4022.51 Determination of section 4022(c) benefits in a PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination. ( a ) *Amount of unfunded nonguaranteed benefits.* For purposes of this section, and subject to paragraph (b) of this section, a plan's amount of unfunded nonguaranteed benefits means the plan's outstanding amount of benefit liabilities, as defined in section 4001(a)(19) of ERISA, determined as of the plan's termination date. A plan's amount of unfunded nonguaranteed benefits is multiplied by the applicable recovery ratio to determine the aggregate amount to be allocated with respect to participants of the plan under section 4022(c)(1) of ERISA.
( b ) *Benefits included in unfunded nonguaranteed benefits.* For purposes of computing benefits under section 4022(c) of ERISA in a PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination, unfunded nonguaranteed benefits are benefits under a plan as of the plan's termination date that are neither guaranteed by PBGC (taking into account section 4022(g) of ERISA) nor funded by the plan's assets (taking into account section 4044(e) of ERISA).
( c ) *Determination of recovery ratio.* In a PPA 2006 bankruptcy termination, the recovery ratio under section 4022(c)(3) of ERISA is determined as follows. The numerator is based on PBGC's recoveries under section 4062, 4063, or 4064, valued as of the plan's (or plans') termination date (or dates). The denominator of the recovery ratio is based on the amount of unfunded benefit liabilities, as defined in section 4001(a)(18) of ERISA, as of the plan's (or plans') termination date (or dates).
[76 FR 34603, June 14, 2011]
#### § 784.100 The section 13(a)(5) exemption.

Section 13(a)(5) grants an exemption from both the minimum wage and the overtime requirements of the Act and applies to “any employee employed in the catching, taking, propagating, harvesting, cultivating, or farming of any kind of fish, shellfish, crustacea, sponges, seaweeds, or other aquatic forms of animal and vegetable life, or in the first processing, canning, or packing of such marine products at sea as an incident to, or in conjunction with, such fishing operations, including the going to and returning from work and loading and unloading when performed by any such employee.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,557
<SECURITIES>                                       985
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,448
<INVENTORY>                                     35,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,759
<PP&E>                                         217,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 423,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,808
<BONDS>                                        242,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   423,638
<SALES>                                        467,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               467,536
<CGS>                                          398,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  442,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       713
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,878)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.03)


</TABLE>