alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18
of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, Arthur W. Hicks, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    ARTHUR W. HICKS,
JR.                                   
|                      |  |  |  | Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.                                          
|                      |  |  |  | President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
§ 570.122 General. ( a ) Specific exemptions from the child labor requirements of the Act are provided for: ( 1 ) Employment of children in agriculture outside of school hours for the school district where they live while so employed;
( 2 ) Employment of employees engaged in the delivery of newspapers to the consumer;
( 3 ) Employment of children as actors or performers in motion pictures or in theatrical, radio, or television productions;
( 4 ) Employment by a parent or a person standing in a parent's place of his own child or a child in his custody under the age of sixteen years in any occupation other than manufacturing, mining, or an occupation found by the Secretary to be particularly hazardous for the employment of children between the ages of sixteen and eighteen years or detrimental to their health or well-being.
( 5 ) Employment of homeworkers engaged in the making of evergreen wreaths, including the harvesting of the evergreens or other forest products used in making such wreaths.
( 6 ) Employment of 16- and 17-year-olds to load, but not operate or unload, certain scrap paper balers and paper box compactors under specified conditions.
( 7 ) Employment of 17-year-olds to perform limited driving of cars and trucks during daylight hours under specified conditions.
( 8 ) Employment of youths between the ages of 14 and 18 years who, by statute or judicial order, are excused from compulsory school attendance beyond the eighth grade, under specified conditions, in places of business that use power-driven machinery to process wood products.
( b ) When interpreting these provisions, the Secretary will be guided by the principle that such exemptions should be narrowly construed and their application limited to those employees who are plainly and unmistakably within their terms. Thus, the fact that a child's occupation involves the performance of work which is considered exempt from the child labor provisions will not relieve his employer from the requirements of section 12(c) or the producer, manufacturer, or dealer from the requirements of section 12(a) if, during the course of his employment, the child spends any part of his time doing work which is covered but not so exempt.
[75 FR 28459, May 20, 2010]
### Served: March 21, 2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department ofTransportation on the 21st day ofMarch, 2013 Essential Air Service at 

### DIOMEDE, ALASKA DOCKET DOT-OST-2009-0260 Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 

### etseq.


### NOTICE OF EXTENSION FORPROPOSALS AT DIOMEDE, ALASKA By Order 2013-3-20, February 21, 2013, the Department requested proposals for air service at Diomede, Alaska, under§ 41736, Air Transportation to Non-eligible Places (ATNEP), withproposals due March 21, 2013. On March 20, Pathfinder Aviation, Inc., requested a two-week extension to that deadline. We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Diomede are now due onApril4, 2013.



### Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis An electronic version ofthis document is available on the World Wide Web http://www.regulations.gov
(81 South. 136)

#### HYDE v. STATE.

(6 Div. 502.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 21, 1919.)

Criminal Law &wkey;j1090(1) — Appeal—Bill ox Exceptions.

On appeal upon record proper without a bill of exceptions where record shows regular proceedings free from error and nothing authorizing reversal, judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; T. L. Sowell, Judge.

Aubrey Hyde was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and appeals.

Affirmed.

Leith & Powell, of Jasper, and Lee Cowart, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Emmett S. Thigpen, Atty. Gen., and David W. W. Puller, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

In order that this cause can be considered upon its merits, the motion to set aside the submission of November 2S, 1918, to dismiss the appeal, will be granted, and submission of that date is set aside; a complete record having been filed in the cause, before said motion received consideration by this court.

The appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. The record1 shows an indictment in due and regular form, charging the defendant -with the offense of murder in the second degree; it also shows a verdict of guilty by the jury-finding the defendant guilty of manslaughtei in the first degree, and also a judgment of the court in conformity with the finding of the jury. An examination of the record shows regular proceedings which are free from error, and nothing authorizing a reversal of the case. An affirmance of the judgment appealed from is therefore ordered.

Affirmed.
#### § 783.25 The section 13(b)(6) exemption.

Section 13(b)(6) of the Act exempts from the overtime pay requirements of the Act, but not from its other requirements, “any employee employed as a seaman”.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Schara, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ William Schara

DATE:  March 21, 2011

William Schara, Chief Executive Officer and President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12


                 KERR-McGEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(1)



(Millions of dollars)               1998      1997     1996       1995      1994
                                    ----      ----     ----       ----      ----

Income (loss) from
    continuing operations          $(227)     $194     $220       $(24)     $ 69

Add -
    Provision (benefit) for
        income taxes                (148)       83      103        (45)       30
    Interest expense                  58        46       52         61        58
    Rental expense representa-
        tive of interest factor        6         5        5          4         4
                                   -----      ----     ----       ----      ----

           Earnings                $(311)     $328     $380       $ (4)     $161
                                   =====      ====     ====       ====      ====

Fixed Charges -
    Interest expense               $  58      $ 46     $ 52       $ 61      $ 58
    Rental expense representa-
        tive of interest factor        6         5        5          4         4
    Interest capitalized              12         8        9         11        10
                                   -----      ----     ----       ----      ----

           Total fixed charges        76      $ 59     $ 66       $ 76      $ 72
                                   =====      ====     ====       ====      ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed
        charges                        -(2)    5.6      5.8          -(2)    2.2
                                   =====      ====     ====       ====      ====



(1)The  computation  of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been restated
to conform with the current year's presentation.

(2)Earnings  were  inadequate  to cover  fixed  charges by $387  million and $80
million in 1998 and 1995, respectively.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in Tennessee, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the FOTG of the NRCS in Tennessee for review and comment.

# SUMMARY:

It is the intention of NRCS in Tennessee to issue a revised conservation practice standard, Filter Strip (Code 393), in Section IV of the FOTG.

# DATES:

Comments will be received on or before June 21, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inquire in writing to James W. Ford, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 675 U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. Copies of the practice standards will be made available upon written request.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law to NRCS state technical guides used to perform highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS in Tennessee will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in Tennessee regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.

Dated: May 10, 2000.

James W. Ford,

State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Nashville, Tennessee.

[FR Doc. 00-12782 Filed 5-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
§ 779.240 Employees “handling * * * or otherwise working on goods.” ( a ) *“Goods” upon which the described activities are performed.* Employees will be considered to be handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods within the meaning of section 3(s) if they engage in the described activities on “goods” which “have been moved in or produced for commerce by any person.” They may be handling or working on such goods which the enterprise does not sell. The term “goods” is defined in section 3(i) of the Act. The definition is explained in § 779.107 and discussed comprehensively in part 776 of this chapter. As defined in section 3(i) of the Act, the term includes any part or ingredient of “goods” and, in general, includes “articles or subjects of commerce of any character.” Thus the term “goods,” as used in section 3(s), includes all goods which have been moved in or produced for commerce, such as stock-in-trade, or raw materials that have been moved in or produced for commerce.
( b ) *“Handling * * * or otherwise working on goods.”* The term “handling * * * or otherwise working on goods” used in section 3(s) is substantially the same as the term used since 1938 in section 3(j) of the Act. Both terms will therefore be considered to have essentially the same meaning. (See part 776 of this chapter, the interpretative bulletin on the general coverage of the Act.) Thus, the activities encompassed in the term “handling or in any other manner working on goods” in section 3(s) are the same as the activities, encompassed in the similar term in section 3(j), by which goods are “produced” within the meaning of the Act. In general, the term “handling * * * or otherwise working on goods” includes employees who sort, screen, grade, store, pack, label, address, transport, deliver, print, type, or otherwise handle or work on the goods. The same will be true of employees who handle or work on “any part of ingredient of the goods” referred to in the discussion of the term “goods” in § 779.107. An employee will be considered engaged in “handling * * * or otherwise working on goods,” within the meaning of section 3(s), only if he performs the described activities on goods that “have been moved in or produced for commerce by any person.” This requirement is discussed in §§ 779.242 and 779.243.
§ 776.4 Workweek standard. ( a ) The workweek is to be taken as the standard in determining the applicability of the Act.[13] Thus, if in any workweek an employee is engaged in both covered and noncovered work he is entitled to both the wage and hours benefits of the Act for all the time worked in that week, unless exempted therefrom by some specific provision of the Act. The proportion of his time spent by the employee in each type of work is not material. If he spends any part of the workweek in covered work he will be considered on exactly the same basis as if he had engaged exclusively in such work for the entire period. Accordingly, the total number of hours which he works during the workweek at both types of work must be compensated for in accordance with the minimum wage and overtime pay provisions of the Act.
( b ) It is thus recognized that an employee may be subject to the Act in one workweek and not in the next. It is likewise true that some employees of an employer may be subject to the Act and others not. But the burden of effecting segregation between covered and noncovered work as between particular workweeks for a given employee or as between different groups of employees is upon the employer. Where covered work is being regularly or recurrently performed by his employees, and the employer seeks to segregate such work and thereby relieve himself of his obligations under sections 6 and 7 with respect to particular employees in particular workweeks, he should be prepared to show, and to demonstrate from his records, that such employees in those workweeks did not engage in any activities in interstate or foreign commerce or in the production of goods for such commerce, which would necessarily include a showing that such employees did not handle or work on goods or materials shipped in commerce or used in production of goods for commerce, or engage in any other work closely related and directly essential to production of goods for commerce.[14] The Division's experience has indicated that much so-called “segregation” does not satisfy these tests and that many so-called “segregated” employees are in fact engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.
Footnotes -
776.4
[13] See *Gordon's Transports* v. *Walling,* 162 F. 2d 203 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 332 U.S. 774; *Walling* v. *Fox-Pelletier Detective Agency,* 4 W.H. Cases 452 (W.D. Tenn.), 8 Labor Cases 62,219; *Walling* v. *Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.,* 59 F. Supp. 348 (W.D. Ky.); *Fleming* v. *Knox,* 42 F. Supp. 948 (S.D. Ga.); *Roberg* v. *Henry Phipps Estate,* 156 F. 2d 958 (C.A. 2). For a definition of the workweek, see § 778.2(c) of this chapter.
[14] See *Guess* v. *Montague,* 140 F. 2d 500 (C.A. 4).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 180 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 180

  Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato Commission and 
            designating May 2007 as ``Idaho Potato Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2007

     Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Craig) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 10, 2007

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato Commission and 
            designating May 2007 as ``Idaho Potato Month''.

Whereas the State of Idaho produces roughly one-third of all the potatoes grown 
        in the United States, harvesting an average of 12,000,000,000 to 
        14,000,000,000 pounds annually;
Whereas the State of Idaho's unique climate of warm days, cool nights, mountain-
        fed irrigation, and rich volcanic soil is conducive to growing world-
        renowned potatoes;
Whereas Idaho potatoes are top-selling and highly recognized potatoes in the 
        United States due to their consistently great taste, versatility, and 
        nutritional content;
Whereas the Idaho potato ``brand'' is recognized throughout the world for its 
        high quality and is an identifying characteristic of the great State of 
        Idaho;
Whereas May 2007 marks the 70th consecutive year that Idaho potatoes have been 
        promoted by the Idaho Potato Commission, an Idaho potato industry group 
        responsible for generating attention for the numerous attributes of 
        Idaho potatoes;
Whereas the Idaho Potato Commission is recognized nationally and internationally 
        as a top promotional authority for Idaho's potatoes and potato products;
Whereas the Idaho Potato Commission's requirement, since 1959, that only 
        potatoes grown in the State of Idaho are allowed to wear the ``Grown in 
        Idaho'' Federal certification mark contributed toward the creation of a 
        distinctive, enduringly successful, and popular brand for the Russet 
        Burbank potato variety; and
Whereas Idaho's potato industry contributes approximately $2,700,000,000 to the 
        State economy and employs 39,000 residents: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato 
        Commission; and
            (2) designates May 2007 as ``Idaho Potato Month''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of this 20th day of April, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), by and between MOBILE MINI, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and Chris Miner (the “Employee”). 
 RECITALS: 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2009 (as previously amended,
the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the provision in the Employment Agreement
relating to the Employee’s right to severance after the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual agreements and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows, effective as of the Effective Date: 
 1. Section 6(b)(ii) of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated to read as
follows (revisions are underlined): 
 “(ii) the Company shall pay the Executive, as severance pay and in lieu of any
further salary for periods subsequent to the Termination Date, in a single payment an amount in cash equal to one (1) times the sum of (A) the Executive’s Base Salary at the highest rate in effect at any time within the ninety
(90) day period ending on the date the Notice of Termination is given and (B) the “Payment Amount.” For purposes of this Amendment, the term “Payment Amount” shall mean an amount which is equal to
seventy-five percent (75%) of the Executive’s Base Salary in effect during the year in which the Termination Date shall occur;” 

2. Section 6(c) of the Employment Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows (revisions are underlined): 

“(c) Following a Change in Control. If within one year following the occurrence of a Change of Control the
Employee’s employment by the Company is terminated either by the Company other than for Cause, death or Disability, or by the Employee for Good Reason, then the Employee shall be entitled to the benefits provided below (the “CiC
Benefits” and together with Without Cause Benefits, the “Severance Benefits”): . . .” 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective
Date. 
  

			
	MOBILE MINI, INC.
		
	By:		/s/ Erik Olsson
	Title:		/s/ President & CEO
	
	EMPLOYEE
	
	/s/ Chris Miner
	Chris Miner
a51081382ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Fiscal Year 2016 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards



(Restricted Stock Time-Based Vesting)


 


 


 



	
Named


Executive Officer

	
Restricted Stock* 


(Time-Based Vesting) (#)


	 	 
	 	 
	
Michael R. Benkel

	  
	
Executive Vice President,      


Planning and Allocations

	
10,917


	 	 
	 	 
	
Laura A. Coffey

	  
	
Executive Vice President, 


Interim Chief Financial Officer

	
6,898


	 	 
	 	 
	
Catherine David

	  
	
Executive Vice President, 


Merchandising

	
13,646


	 	 
	 	 
	
Sharon M. Leite

	  
	
Executive Vice President, 


Sales and Customer Experience

	
12,888







 







*These equity awards were granted under the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, restated as amended through March 25, 2011.  The form of time-based restricted stock award agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.2.  The grants were effective April 10, 2015.