alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government          

Here’s how you know

**Official websites use .gov**A              **.gov** website belongs to an official government              organization in the United States.            

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A              **lock** (              LockLocked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.            

Skip to contentSkip to navigation

- Home
- About +   - Spread the Word
- Focus Areas +   - Accessible, Affordable Housing
  - Fair Housing
  - Homelessness
  - Supportive Services
  - Transitions Out of Institutions
  - Traumatic Brain Injury
  - Tribal Housing
- Tools +   - Data & Reports
  - Directories
  - Funding & Programs
  - Models
  - Terms & Acronyms
  - Tools & Toolkits
  - Training & Education
- What's New

I need housing or services help

# Service Coordination Funding Streams

Sustaining service coordination across the community necessitates the use of multiple funding streams. The following resources provide concrete facts, links, promising practices, and approaches to funding and sustaining service coordination in both federally subsidized housing and in the community.
                  - Coming Soon!  Braiding and Blending Funding Streams to Expand Access to Service Coordination for People with Disabilities and Older Adults : tool focusing on approaches to braiding and blending funding to expand and sustain service coordination in the community. Users will find descriptions of potential funding sources and successful promising practices from Seattle Housing Authority and The Kelsey, a disability-forward housing developer.
                  - Medicaid's Role in Housing : issue brief on how Medicaid programs pay for housing-related services, including an overview of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance and examples of how states are blending and braiding multiple funding sources to provide supports, including service coordination-related activities, for various populations   

*Last modified on 02/07/2024*

## Related Links

Service Coordination Toolkit (main)

Building Partnerships

Tools & Resources

**      Back to Top    

## 

The Housing and Services Resource Center is part of an interagency initiative to streamline and expand access to affordable, accessible housing and the critical services that make community living possible.

 

## Site Support

-  Accessibility 
-  Disclaimers 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Sitemap 
-  Viewers & Players 

## Helpful Sites

-  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
-  No Fear Act 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

## Sign up for email

Subscribe * *

**  Share on Other Platforms

An official website of the Administration for Community Living, an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
III 

Calendar No. 193 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 171 

Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the United States flag to halfstaff on the day of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service 

in Emmitsburg, Maryland. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. MCCAIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. CARPER, Mr. DODD, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. PRYOR, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. SMITH, Mr. COLEMAN, Ms. STABENOW, 

Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. BOND, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DOMENICI, 

Mrs. DOLE, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. 

OBAMA, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. CARDIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the United 

States flag to half-staff on the day of the National Fallen 

Firefighters Memorial Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland. 

Whereas 1,100,000 men and women comprise the fire service 

in the United States; 

Whereas the fire service is considered one of the most dangerous professions in the United States; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

SRES 171 RS 

Whereas fire service personnel selflessly respond to over 

22,500,000 emergency calls annually, without reservation 

and with an unwavering commitment to the safety of 

their fellow citizens; 

Whereas fire service personnel are the first to respond to an 

emergency, whether it involves a fire, medical emergency, 

spill of hazardous materials, natural disaster, act of terrorism, or transportation accident; and 

Whereas approximately 100 fire service personnel die annually in the line of duty: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That this year, the United States flags on 

2 all Federal facilities should be lowered to half-staff on the 

3 day of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service 

4 in Emmitsburg, Maryland. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Calendar No. 193 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 171 

RESOLUTION 

Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the 

Emmitsburg, Maryland. National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service in United States flag to half-staff on the day of the 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 24

                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each of the non employee Directors of MacDermid, Incorporated signed
identical powers of attorney in the following form:

                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, a director of
MacDermid, Incorporated, hereby constitutes and appoints Harold Leever
and Daniel H. Leever, and each of them acting alone, the true and
lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, with full
power and authority in said agents and attorneys-in-fact to delegate
the power herein conferred to any person or persons said agents and
attorneys-in-fact shall select, to sign in the place of the undersigned
in his capacity as a director of the Corporation, the Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, of the Corporation to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C.,
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and sign any
amendment or amendments to such Form 10-K; hereby ratifying and
confirming all acts taken by such agents and attorneys-in-fact or
any one of them, as herein authorized.

                                  (Signature)*


May 14, 1999

*  The Directors who signed the powers of attorney were:
          Donald G. Ogilvie
          James C. Smith
          R. Nelson Griebel
(77 South. 983)

#### SCOTT v. ALABAMA, T. & N. RY. CO.

(2 Div. 151.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1918.)

Appeal and Error <&wkey;569(2) — “Bill of Exceptions’ ’ — Signing.

Under Code 1907, § 3019, as to bill of exceptions, a purported bill of exceptions could not be considered where it bore no indorsement of its presentation by the trial judge, or that it was ever signed as such by the judge who tried the case; a bill of exceptions being defined as “a formal statement in writing of exceptions taken by a party on the trial to a ruling, decision, charge, or opinion of the trial judge, setting out the proceedings on the trial, the acts and rulings of the trial judge alleged to be erroneous, the objections and exceptions taken thereto, together with the grounds therefor, and authenticated by the signature of the trial judge,” and its character as a record and its verity as such comipg from the fact of its approval by the trial judge, which can be evidenced in no other way than by his signature.

[Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Bill of Exceptions.]

Appeal from Circuit Court, Choctaw County; C. R. Gavin, Special Judge.

Action between Freeman Scott and the Alabama, Tennessee & Northern Railway Company. From a judgment, Freeman Scott appeals.

Affirmed.

D. M. Boswell, of York, for appellant. J. M. Pelham, Jr., of Chatom, for appellee.

BRICKEN, J.

What purports to be a bill of exceptions in this case cannot be considered and treated as such on this appeal, for the reason that it bears no indorsement of its presentation by the trial judge, or that it was ever signed as such by the judge who tried the case. Section 3019, Code 1907, provides that:

> “Bills of exceptions may be presented at any time within ninety days from the day on which the judgment is entered, and not afterwards. * * * The judge must indorse thereon and as a part of the bill, the true date of presenting, and the bill of exceptions, if correct, be signed by him within ninety days thereafter.”

A bill of exceptions is defined as being:

> “A formal statement in writing of exceptions taken by a party on the trial to a ruling, decision, charge or opinion of the trial judge, setting out the proceedings on the trial, the acts and rulings of the trial judge alleged to be erroneous, the objections and exceptions taken thereto, together with the grounds therefor, and authenticated by the signature of the trial judge.”

Its character as a record and its. verity as such comes from the fact of its approval by the trial judge, which can be evidenced in no other way than by his signature. Code 1907, § 3019. In the instant case, there is no indorsement by the trial judge that the purported bill of exceptions has ever been presented to him, nor does it bear any signature of said trial judge coupled with the statement that it is a correct bill of exceptions.

The assignments of error being predicated solely upon what is termed the bill of exceptions leaves nothing before this court for consideration, which necessarily results that the judgment of the lower, court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### § 2580.412-23 Exemption.

An exemption from the bonding requirements of the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act is granted by this section whereby bonding arrangements (which otherwise comply with the requirements of section 13 of the Act and the regulations issued thereunder) with companies authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury as acceptable reinsurers on Federal bonds will satisfy the bonding requirements of the Act.
#### § 780.146 Importance of relationship of the practice to farming generally.

The inclusion of incidental practices in the definition of agriculture was not intended to include typical factory workers or industrial operations, and the sponsors of the bill made it clear that the erection and operation on a farm by a farmer of a factory, even one using raw materials which he grows, “would not make the manufacturing * * * a farming operation” (see 81 Cong. Rec. 7658; *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* 349 U.S. 254). Accordingly, in determining whether a given practice is performed “as an incident to or in conjunction with” farming operations under the intended meaning of section 3(f), the nature of the practice and the circumstances under which it is performed must be considered in the light of the common understanding of what is agricultural and what is not, or the facts indicating whether performance of the practice is in competition with agricultural or with industrial operations, and of the extent to which such a practice is ordinarily performed by farmers incidentally to their farming operations (see *Bowie* v. *Gonzales,* 117 F. 2d 11; *Calaf* v. *Gonzalez,* 127 F. 2d 934; *Vives* v. *Seralles,* 145 F. 2d 552; *Mitchell* v. *Hunt,* 263 F. 2d 913; *Holtville Alfalfa Mills* v. *Wyatt,* 230 F. 2d 398; *Mitchell* v. *Budd,* 350 U.S. 473; *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* supra). Such an inquiry would appear to have a direct bearing on whether a practice is an “established” part of agriculture. The fact that farmers raising a commodity on which a given practice is performed do not ordinarily perform such a practice has been considered a significant indication that the practice is not “agriculture” within the secondary meaning of section 3(f) (*Mitchell* v. *Budd,* supra; *Maneja* v. *Waialua,* supra). The test to be applied is not the proportion of those performing the practice who produce the commodities on which it is performed but the proportion of those producing such commodities who perform the practice (*Maneja* v. *Waialua,* supra). In *Mitchell* v. *Budd,* supra, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the following two factors tipped the scales so as to take the employees of tobacco bulking plants outside the scope of agriculture: Tobacco farmers do not ordinarily perform the bulking operation; and, the bulking operation is a process which changes tobacco leaf in many ways and turns it into an industrial product.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40820 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. PEDRO SALCIDO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-1011-1
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Pedro Salcido appeals his 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess cocainewith intent todistribute. Salcido argues that the district court erred in refusing to grant a downward adjustment for his minor or minimal role in the offense. He contends that he was on the bottom rung of the conspiracy ladder and that hewasmerely a delivery man. In the district court, Salcido sought only a two-level reduction for his minor role in the offense. His preserved objection United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 21, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40820

2 to the denial of a minor role adjustment is reviewed for clear error. U nited States v. Martinez-Larraga, 517 F.3d 258, 272 n.12 (5th Cir. 2008). He did not seek a minimal role adjustment in the district court. Issues raised for the first time on appeal are reviewed for plain error. Id. at 272. “[I]n order toqualify as a minor participant, a defendant must have been peripheral to the advancement of the illicit ac tivity.” U nited States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). The facts contained in the presentence report and admitted by Salcido establish that hewas not peripheral totheconspiracy: he brokered the deal; he possessed a key to the stash house; a utility bill for the stash house and a drug ledger were found in his residenc e; and he was driving a vehicle which had a gate pass to access the private subdivision where the stash house was located. Because the district court did not clearly err in denying the minor role adjustment, it necessarily did not commit error, plain or otherwise, in denying
a minimal role adjustment, which applies to participants having less than a minor role in the offense. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, cmt. n.4. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)

                    LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Name Under Which such Subsidiary
       Name of Subsidiary             Jurisdiction of Incorporation                Does Business
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>                                               <C>
Lufkin Industries Canada, Ltd.        Province of Alberta, Canada                       Same

P. T. Lufkin Indonesia                Republic of Indonesia                             Same

Lufkin Industries FSC, Corp           Barbados                                          Same

Lufkin Japan, L. L. C.                Japan                                             Same

Lufkin France, EURL                   France                                            Same

Lufkin Oilfield Services Egypt        Egypt                                             Same
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32-1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the  Quarterly  Report of Twin  Faces  East  Entertainment
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period  ended  March
31,  2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the  date
hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Michael Smolanoff, President and Chief  Executive
Officer  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



                              /s/ Michael Smolanoff
                              Michael Smolanoff
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              August 26, 2003
#### § 779.265 Basis for making computations.

The annual gross dollar volume of sales made or business done of an enterprise or establishment consists of the gross receipts from all of its sales or its volume of business done during a 12-month period. Where a computation of the annual gross volume is necessary to determine monetary obligations to employees under the Act whether in an enterprise which has one or more retail or service establishments, or in any establishment in such enterprise, or in any gasoline service establishment, it must be based on the most recent prior experience which it is practicable to use. This was recognized in the Congress when the legislation was under consideration. (S. Rept. No. 145, 87th Cong., first session, p. 38 discusses in detail the calculation of the annual gross volume.) When gross receipts of an enterprise show that the annual dollar volume of sales made or business done meets the statutory tests for coverage and nonexemption, the employer must comply with the Act's monetary provisions from that time on or until such time as the tests are not met. (See § 779.266.)
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           302 CERTIFICATION

I, L.J. McLaughlin, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Longview Fibre
Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
         to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
         period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
         the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
         fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
         affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
         registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

L. J. McLAUGHLIN	                              01/21/04
L. J. McLAUGHLIN,
Senior Vice President-Finance, Secretary and Treasurer
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Summa Industries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for thefiscal year ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Swartwout, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   /s/  James R. Swartwout |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James R.  Swartwout                 |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer            |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer            |
|   | Summa Industries                    |
|   | July 18, 2003                       |

 

----