alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.54 Hearing. ( a ) Except as provided in § 6.53(c) of this title, the hearing shall commence immediately upon the close of the prehearing conference. All matters remaining in controversy, including the presentation of additional evidence, shall be considered at the hearing. There shall be a minimum of formality in the proceeding consistent with orderly procedure.
( b ) To expedite the proceeding the Administrative Law Judge shall, after consultation with the parties, set reasonable guidelines and limitations for the presentations to be made at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge may limit cross-examination and may question witnesses.
( c ) Under no circumstances shall source data obtained by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, or the names of establishments contacted by the Bureau be submitted into evidence or otherwise disclosed. Where the Bureau has conducted a survey, the published summary of the data may be submitted into evidence.
( d ) Affidavits or depositions may be admitted at the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge. The Administrative Law Judge may also require that unduly repetitious testimony be submitted as affidavits. Such affidavits shall be submitted within three days of the conclusions of the hearing.
( e ) Counsel for the Administrator shall participate in the proceeding to the degree he/she deems appropriate.
( f ) An expedited transcript shall be made of the hearing and of the prehearing conference.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 89 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 89

 Authorizing Frank Woodruff Buckles to lie in honor in the rotunda of 
                      the Capitol upon his death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2008

Mr. Burr (for himself, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Specter, Mr. Craig, Mrs. Dole, and 
 Mr. Isakson) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing Frank Woodruff Buckles to lie in honor in the rotunda of 
                      the Capitol upon his death.

Whereas the veterans of the First World War fought bravely and made heroic 
        sacrifices for the Allied forces; and
Whereas past resolutions have sought authorization for American heroes to lie in 
        honor in the rotunda of the Capitol upon an individual's passing, it is 
        the Nation's collective desire to express its gratitude for the service 
        of all World War I veterans by making it known to that war's last 
        American survivor the honor it wishes to bestow on him before he passes: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING FRANK WOODRUFF BUCKLES.

    (a) In General.--In recognition of the historic contributions of 
United States veterans who served in the First World War, Frank 
Woodruff Buckles, the last surviving United States veteran of the First 
World War, shall be permitted to lie in honor in the rotunda of the 
Capitol upon his death, so that the citizens of the United States may 
pay their last respects to this great American.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction and supervision of the President pro tempore of the Senate 
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take the 
necessary steps to implement subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
2015.03.31 EX 10.1




Exhibit 10.1


2015 Amendment To
Chicago Bridge & Iron
2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan




This 2015 Amendment to the Chicago Bridge & Iron 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which was established by Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , a Delaware corporation (the "Company") under which Awards may be granted from time to time to Participants.


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of "Retirement" for 2015 and later Awards;


WHEREAS, capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended in the following particulars effective as of February 18, 2015 except as otherwise specified:


AMENDMENT


		
	1.
	Section 2.34 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following :




"2.34.    "Retirement" means:


(a)With respect to Awards granted to an Employee before February 18, 2015, a termination of employment after age 55 and at least a 10 year period of employment by CB&I or the Company or their respective present or former Subsidiaries or Affiliates , or a 30-year period of such employment , or age 65.


(b)With respect to Awards granted to an Employee on or after February 18, 2015, a termination of employment after age 65; provided , however, that with respect to any particular Award , Retirement shall not apply to the vesting or other treatment of that Award unless the Employee has remained an Employee through and including December 31 of the calendar year in which the Award was granted.


(c)With respect to Awards granted to a Nonemployee Director or nonemployee consultant, termination of service following the term of a Nonemployee Director or a resignation required by an age limitation, or the expiration of the term of a consulting agreement.


Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee as part of an Award Agreement or otherwise may provide that for purposes of this Section, a Participant may be credited with such additional years of age and employment as the Committee in its sole discretion shall determine is appropriate, and may provide such additional or different conditions for Retirement as the Committee in its sole discretion shall determine is appropriate."









All other definitions and all other rights, terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain the same with the same force and effect as originally adopted and approved by the Company's shareholders.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has executed this 2015 Amendment effective as of the effective date first written above.












/s/ Philip K. Asherman                 
Philip K. Asherman


/s/ Ronald A. Ballschmiede                 
Ronald A. Ballschmiede



2
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.41 Referral to Chief Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) Upon timely receipt of a request for a hearing under § 4.12 of part 4 or § 5.12 of part 5 of this title, where the Administrator has determined that relevant facts are in dispute, or on his/her own motion, the Administrator shall refer the case to the Chief Administrative Law Judge by Order of Reference, to which shall be attached a copy of any findings of the Administrator and response thereto, for designation of an Administrative Law Judge to conduct such hearings as may be necessary to decide the disputed matters. A copy of the Order of Reference and attachments thereto shall be served upon the person or firm requesting the hearing, if any and upon the respondents.
( b ) The findings of the Administrator and response thereto shall be given the effect of a complaint and answer, respectively, for purposes of the administrative proceedings.
Exhibit 21.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010



|I. |  | Parent Company
|-- |  | --------------



Lydall, Inc.



|II. |  | First tier
|--- |  | ----------



Lydall Thermal/Acoustical, Inc.

Lydall Filtration/Separation, Inc.

Lydall International, Inc.

Lydall
France S.A.S.

Lydall Deutschland Holding GmbH

Lydall Netherlands B.V.



|III. |  | Second tier
|---- |  | -----------



Charter Medical, Ltd.

Lydall Asia
Limited

Lydall Thermal/Acoustical Sales, LLC

Lydall Industrial Thermal Solutions, Inc.

Trident II, Inc.

Lydall Filtration/Separation S.A.S.

Lydall Thermique/Acoustique S.A.S.

Lydall Gerhardi GmbH & Co. KG

Lydall Solutech B.V.



|IV. |  | Third tier
|--- |  | ----------



Lydall Industrial Thermal Sales/Service, LLC

Lydall Gerhardi Verwaltungs GmbH

Lydall Shanghai Trading Company



|V. |  | Fourth tier
|-- |  | -----------



Affinity Industries Asia, LLC
#### BECKER PLUMBING SUPPLY CO v RIALTO IMPROVEMENT CO

Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co

No 10598.

Decided May 19, 1930

Kohrman & Kohrman, Cleveland, for Plumbing Co.

J. B. Oviatt, Cleveland, for Improvement Co.

*411SULLIVAN, J.

There was no contract between Reimer and The Rialto Improvement Co., and an allegation of this nature we think would be necessary under 8310 GC. The defendant, McNeff, filed a general denial.

From an examination of the record we find that the McNeffs purchased, the property and were the owners thereof at the timé it was sought to place a lien upon the premises and there is no evidence that any notice as required by law of the filing of the lien or the indebtedness upon which it was based, was served upon the owners, the McNeffs, or their agents, and it is clear from the record that these owners were living on the premises and certain parties were under their employ who might have been served, in order to perfect the lien, as agents of the owners, but the record is silent as to an observance of the statute in this regard.

The McNeffs were innocent purchasers of the property in question. It appears that they exercised due care in the purchase of the property and no blame can attach to them because of the lack of necesary service.

Sec. 8315 provides for the necessity of serving a copy of the affidavit filed with the recorder within thirty days, upon the owner or his agents or lessees and there is no proof of conformity to this section, and there is also no evidence forming the basis for a justifiable excuse under the authorities which require that there must be a liberal interpretation of the law in favor of the party asserting the lien.

We think from a reading of the entire record that it is impossible to declare the lien valid and on the whole we think the record favors a decree for defendants, and the same decree may be entered herein as in the court below. O.S.J.

Vickery, PJ., and Levine, J., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-856 (Final)] 

# AGENCY:

International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of hearing, posthearing briefs, and final comments. 

# SUMMARY:

On May 19, 2000, the Department of Commerce informed the Commission that a suspension agreement had been signed in the subject investigation. Accordingly, the Commission hereby cancels the hearing on the investigation currently scheduled for May 25, 2000, the posthearing briefs currently due on June 1, 2000, and the final comments currently due on June 22, 2000. The Commission unanimously determined that no earlier announcement of this cancellation was possible. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 22, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Taylor (202-708-4101), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

Authority: This investigation is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR § 207.21). 

Issued: May 22, 2000. 

By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 00-13267 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
----

NOTICE OF SELECTION PROCEDURE

(2004/C 264/04)

The European Parliament Secretariat is organising the following selection procedure:

----

(1)OJ C 264 A, 27.10.2004 (French-language edition).

----
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | ALLEN & CROUCH PETROLEUM ENGINEERS, INC |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   | By: | /s/ Richard L. Vine, P.E. |   |
|   |   |   | Richard L. Vine, P.E. |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | September 24, 2012 |   |   |   |
#### Cyril Johnson, respondent, *v.*Hardman Rubber Company, appellant.

[Argued March 21st, 1907.

Decided June 17th, 1907.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

*945
      *Messrs. Goult •& Smith,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Ghauncey G. Parker,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set out in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens, delivered in the court below.

*For*affirmance—Tiie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenoitard, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL-14.

*For*reversal—None.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 250 

Expressing the Sense of the Senate condemning the military junta in Burma 

for its continued detention of Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2007 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. LUGAR, Mrs. LINCOLN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mrs. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the Sense of the Senate condemning the military 

junta in Burma for its continued detention of Aung 

San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners. 

Whereas Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi has 

dedicated her life to the peaceful, non-violent movement 

for democracy and reconciliation in the Union of Burma; 

Whereas Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy won a majority of parliamentary seats in Burma’s last election held in 1990; 

Whereas the State Peace and Development Council of Burma 

refuses to cede power and permit representative government and has detained Aung San Suu Kyi under house 

arrest for 11 of the last 17 years; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 250 ATS 

Whereas the ruling military junta has committed numerous, 

well-documented atrocities against the people of Burma; 

Whereas Aung San Suu Kyi continues to promote peaceful 

dialogue and reconciliation despite mistreatment from the 

State Peace and Development Council; 

Whereas the United States recognizes and supports the dedication and commitment to freedom demonstrated by 

Aung San Suu Kyi: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Aung 

3 San Suu Kyi for her courage and devotion to the 

4 people of the Union of Burma and their struggle for 

5 democracy; and 

6 (2) calls for the immediate release of Aung San 

7 Suu Kyi and other political prisoners by the State 

8 Peace and Development Council. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Certifications Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The annual report on form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. for the year ended
October 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ADC
Telecommunications, Inc.
 /s/ Robert E. SwitzRobert E. SwitzDecember 19, 2008/s/ James G. MathewsJames G. MathewsDecember 19, 2008
#### § 778.324 Effect on hourly rate employees.

A similar situation is presented where employees have been hired at an hourly rate of pay and have customarily worked a fixed workweek. If the workweek is reduced from 40 to 35 hours without reduction in total pay, the average hourly rate is thereby increased as in § 778.322. If the reduction in work schedule is accompanied by a new agreement altering the mode of compensation from an hourly rate basis to a fixed salary for a variable workweek up to 40 hours, the results described in § 778.323 follow.
#### § 790.11 Contract, custom or practice in effect “at the time of such activity.”

The “contract,” “custom” or “practice” on which the compensability of the activities referred to in section 4 of the Portal Act may be based, is a contract, custom or practice in effect “at the time of such activity.” Thus, the compensability of such an activity, and its inclusion in computation of hours worked, is not determinable by a custom or practice which had been terminated before the activity was engaged in or was adopted some time after the activity was performed. This phrase would also seem to permit recognition of changes in customs, practices and agreements which reflect changes in labor-management relations or policies.
Exhibit 23.1










INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Arrow-Magnolia International, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement No. 333-01511 on Form S-8 of Arrow-Magnolia
International, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated February
11, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Arrow-Magnolia International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and
related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31,
1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Arrow-Magnolia
International, Inc. and subsidiaries.



     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP





Dallas, Texas
March 24, 1997
§ 785.32 Apprenticeship training. As an enforcement policy, time spent in an organized program of related, supplemental instruction by employees working under bona fide apprenticeship programs may be excluded from working time if the following criteria are met: ( a ) The apprentice is employed under a written apprenticeship agreement or program which substantially meets the fundamental standards of the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training of the U.S. Department of Labor; and
( b ) Such time does not involve productive work or performance of the apprentice's regular duties. If the above criteria are met the time spent in such related supplemental training shall not be counted as hours worked unless the written agreement specifically provides that it is hours worked. The mere payment or agreement to pay for time spent in related instruction does not constitute an agreement that such time is hours worked.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas V. Smith,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                R. D. LeslieR.
                D. LeslieChief
                FinancialOfficer





March
      1,
      2007





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
      other purpose.
#### §§ 2706.171-2706.999 [Reserved]
#### § 783.28 General legislative history.

As originally enacted in 1938, section 13(a)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act exempted from both the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements “any employee employed as a seaman” (52 Stat. 1050). In 1949 when several amendments were made to the Act (63 Stat. 910), this exemption was not changed except that it was renumbered section 13(a)(14). In the 1961 amendments (75 Stat. 65), a like exemption was retained but it was limited to one employed as a seaman on a vessel other than an American vessel (section 13(a)(14)); an overtime exemption was provided for all employees employed as seamen (section 13(b)(6)), and those employed as seamen on an American vessel were brought within the minimum wage provisions (sec. 6(b)(2)).
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 24-0006 

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM 

BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER ORDER 

Charles J. L. Jaskolski has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montana 

pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, 

governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Jaskolski has provided the necessary documentation 

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV of the Rules for 

Admission to the State Bar of Montana. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Charles J. L. Jaskolski may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State 

of Montana. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this I 3 day of August, 2024. 

Chief Justice 

F ILEO 

3 2024

ood 

n Greer" ' rt Uri tInvve, supreme 

cletZtle Of ivInntar10

08/13/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0006