U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1042 

Economic Effects of Western 

Federal Land-Use Restrictions 

on U.S. Coal Markets 
AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Instructions on. ordering publications of the U.S. Geologic~! SurV'ey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the 

current-year issues of the ·monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey.". Prices of available U.S. Geological 

Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed inj the most recent annual "Price and A vailabiJity List." Publications 

that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price 

and Availability List" are no longer available. ' . 

Prices of reports released to the open files are given in tljle listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated 

monthly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geologic~ Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, 

Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through th~ NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical 

Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfielld, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. 

Order U.S. Geological Survey pubfioations by mail or o~r the counter from the offices given below. 

BY MAIL 

Books 

Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of 

general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of 

Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, 

and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series 

that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are 

obtainable by mail from 

U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports 

Federal Center, Box 25425 

Denver, CO 80225 

Subscriptions to periodicals (Earthquakes & Volcanoes and 

Preliminary Determination of Epicenters) can be obtained ONLY from 

the 

Superintendent of Documents 

Government Printing Office 

Washington, D.C. 20402 

(Check or money order must be payable to Superintendent of 

Documents.) 

Maps 

For maps, address mail orders to 

U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution 

Federal Center, Box 25286 

Denver, CO 80225 

Residents of Alaska may order maps from 

Alaska Distribution Section, U.S. Geological Survey 

New. Federal Building - Box 12 

101 Twelfth Ave., Fairbanks, AK 99701 

OVER THE ~OUNTER· 

Books 

Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the 

counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey Public Inquiries 

Offices, all of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of 

Documents: 

• WASHINGTON, D.C.-Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 

18th and C Sts., NW. 

• DENVER, Colorado-Federal Bldg., Rm. 169, 1961 Stout St. 

• LOS ANGELES, California-Federal Bldg., Rm. 7638, 300 N. 

Los Angeles St. -

• MENLO PARK, California-Bldg. 3 (Stop533), Rm. 3128,345 

Middlefield Rd. 

• RESTON, Virginia-503 National Center, Rm. 1C402, 12201 

Sunrise Valley Dr. 

• SALT LAKE CITY, Utah-Federal Bldg., Rm. 8105, 125 South 

State St. 

• SAN FRANCISCO, California-Customhouse, Rm. 504, 555 

Battery St. 

• SPOKANE, Washington-U.S. Courthouse, Rm. 678, West 920 

Riverside Ave. 

• ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm. 101, 4230 University Dr. 

• ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Federal Bldg., Rm. E-146, 701 C St. 

1 Maps 

Maps may be purchased over the counter at the U.S. Geological 

Survey offices where books are sold (all addresses in above list) and at 

the following U.S. Geological Survey offices: 

• ROLLA, Missouri-1400 Independence Rd. 

• DENVER, Colorado-Map Distribution, Bldg. 810, Federal 

Center 

• FAIRBANKS, Alaska-New Federal Bldg., 101 Twelfth Ave. 
Economic Effects of Western 

Federal Land-Use Restrictions 

on U.S. Coal Markets 

By WILLIAM D. WATSON, ANTOINETIE L. MEDLIN, KATHLEEN K. KROHN, 

DAVIDS. BROOKSHIRE, and RICHARD L. BERNKNOPF 

A study of the long-term economic implications of land-use 

restrictions on the availability of the nation's coal resources. 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1042 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Dallas L. Peck, Director 

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive 

purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1991 

Free on application to the 

Books and Open-File Reports Section 

U.S. Geological Survey 

Federal Center, Box 25425 

Denver, CO 80225 

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data 

Economic effects of western Federal land use restrictions on U.S. coal markets I William D. Watson ... [et. al.]. 

p. em. - (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1042) 

Includes bibliographical references. 

Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.4/2:1040 

1. Coal trade-Government policy-United States. 2. Coal leases-West 

(U.S.) 3. West (U.S.)-Public lands. 4. Forest conservation-West 

(U.S.) 5. Environmental policy-United States. 6. Coal-United 

States-Costs. I. Watson, William Downing, 1938- . II. Series. 

HD9546.E29 1990 

333.8'22'0973-dc20 89-600281 

CIP 
CONTENTS 

Abstract 1 

Executive Summary 1 

Introduction 3 

Acknowledgments 4 

The Issue 4 

Conceptual Framework 6 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) 8 

Data Sources 11 

Coal Supply 11 

SOx Regulations 13 

Coal Transportation 13 

Coal Demand 14 

Results 14 

Conclusions 19 

References 19 

Appendixes 21 

Introduction to Appendixes 22 

References 23 

Appendix A-Market Simulation Model 24 

A General Mathematical Model 24 

Objective Function 25 

Constraints 25 

A Streamlined Model 26 

MSM Applications 30 

MSM Output Reports 31 

References 32 

Appendix B-Minable Coal Resource Base Module 33 

Tonnage 33 

Triangular Distributions of Sulfur Content and Estimates of Average Btu 

Content 36 

Regional Tonnages by Sulfur and Btu Content 37 

References 37 

Appendix C-BLM Land-Use Restrictions 39 

Addendum to Appendix C 42 

Unsuitability Criteria: Screen #2 42 

Multiple-Use Conflicts: Screen #3 46 

Surface Owner Consultation Process: Screen #4 46 

References 46 

Appendix D-Coal Mining Costs Module 48 

References 49 

Appendix E-Coal SOx Removal and Scrubbing Costs Module 50 

References 51 

Appendix F-Coal Transportation Costs Module 52 

References 53 

Contents Ill 
IV Contents 

Appendix G-Coal Supply Module 54 

References 60 

Appendix H-SOx Discharge Limits Module 61 

Reference 61 

Appendix I-Coal Demand Module 62 

Coal Demand Projections, 1985-2030 62 

SIP Electric Utility Boiler Demands 62 

NSPS and RNSPS Electric Utility Boiler Demands 62 

SIP and NSPS Industrial Boiler Demands 64 

Metallurgic and Export Coal Demands 65 

Coal Demand Projections, 2030-2065 65 

References 67 

FIGURES 

1--4. Maps showing: 

1. BLM coal land-use restrictions in the Powder River basin, 

Wyoming 6 

2. Extent of coal-bearing strata in the Powder River basin, Wyoming 7 

3. Coal lands in the Powder River basin, Wyoming 8 

4. Coal lands available for mining after applying BLM's land-use screens 

in the Powder River basin, Wyoming 9 

5. Graph showing the tradeoff between developing and preserving coal 

lands 9 

6. Diagram showing DCAM data required 11 

7. Map showing western coal supply regions where BLM has applied land-use 

restrictions 12 

8. Graph showing effect of BLM coal land-use restrictions on deliverable coal 

tonnage in the Powder River basin, Wyoming 14 

9. Graph showing national projections of coal demand 15 

10. Chart showing alternative land-use restriction cases 16 

11-15. Graphs showing: 

11. Revenue and cost differences, restricted case over base case 16 

12. Revenue and cost increases at market equilibrium after implementing 

land-use restrictions 17 

13. Wyoming coal production, restricted versus base case 18 

14. Montana coal production. restricted versus base case 18 

15. National cost savings 18 

IN1. Diagram showing Dynamic Coal Allocation Model 22 

A1. Graph showing optimal deliveries of coal to NSPS boilers, Evansville, Indiana AQCR 77 29 

A2. Graph showing cost-effective tradeoff between sage grouse habitat and 

national coal delivery costs 31 

A3. Graph showing cost-effective tradeoffs to achieve a given protection level for 

sage grouse habitat 31 

B 1. Diagram showing procedures for estimating the minable coal resource 

base 33 

B2. Map showing coal supply regions in DCAM 34 

B3. Graph showing probability density function for sulfur content 36 

Cl. Map showing BLM land-use restrictions on coal lands in the Powder River 

basin, Montana 40 

C2. Schematic drawing showing boundaries used in NCRDS to estimate 

restricted tonnage by overburden ratio 41 

C3. Chart showing alternative land-use restriction policy cases 41 
G 1-G7. Diagrams showing: 

G 1. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet SIP 

demands 54 

G2. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet NSPS 

demands with unscrubbed coal 55 

G3. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet NSPS 

demands with coal scrubbed 70 percent or greater to reach 0. 6 lb of 

SOx per million Btu heat input 56 

G4. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet NSPS 

demands with coal scrubbed at 90 percent removal efficiency level 57 

G5. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet RNSPS 

demands 58 

G6. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet demands for 

export and metallurgic coal 59 

G7. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet synfuel plant 

demands 59 

Il. Chart showing categories of coal demands projected by the coal demand 

module 63 

I2. Diagram showing procedure for projecting SIP electric utility coal 

demands 64 

I3. Graph showing national coal demand projections 67 

TABLES 

1. Unsuitability criteria applied to Federal coal lands 5 

2. Surface minable coal in Western United States coal supply regions affected by 

BLM's land-use restrictions 12 

3. Surface minable coal resources, alternative land-use restriction cases 13 

4. SOx discharge limits for coal-fired boilers 15 

5. Coal production shifts, restricted versus base case 17 

A1. Dynamic piecewise linear programming model of the U.S. national coal 

market 71 

A2. Legend for interpreting the MSM's mathematical formulation 72 

Bl. Coal supply regions in DCAM 74 

B2. Minable coal resource base, by State-no land-use restrictions 84 

B3. Minable coal resource base for supply regions affected by land-use restrictions, 

surface minable coal 84 

B4. Minable coal resource base, by DCAM coal supply region-no land-use 

restrictions 85 

85. Btu content and distribution parameters for sulfur content by coal supply 

region 86 

86. Minable coal resource base by supply region-tonnage distributed by sulfur content and average Btu content 87 

C 1. Acres defined unsuitable by screen #2 89 

C2. Acres removed from consideration for further coal leasing: screens #2, #3, 

and #4 91 

C3. Surface minable coal resource base under alternative resource cases for supply 

regions affected by land-use restrictions 95 

D 1. Distribution of overburden ratios for supply regions impacted by coal land 

restrictions-surface minable coal 96 

D2. Deliverable coal resources by supply region 97 

D3. RAMC mining cost equations 98 

D4. Regional tonnage-cost schedules: fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by 

sulfur and Btu content 99 

Cont""~ts V 
VI Contents 

El. SOx discharge limits for coal-fired boilers 106 

E2. Cost factors for estimating SOx scrubbing costs 107 

E3. SOx scrubbing costs for each step on the coal resource tonnage-cost 

schedule 108 

Fl. Rail transport rate equations 113 

F2. Loading dock locations for rail/barge transport of coal 115 

F3. Lock capacities for barge transport of coal 116 

F4. Transmission capacities for mine mouth power plants 117 

F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train 117 

F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail 142 

F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge 168 

F8. Equivalent transport rates for coal shipments-transmission from mine mouth 

power plants 178 

G 1. Sulfur and Btu quality restrictions for coal shipped to metallurgic and export 

markets 179 

Hl. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination 180 

H2. NSPS discharge limits by demand region 186 

Il. Boiler capacity utilization schedule 189 

12. Federal regions 189 

13. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 1988 190 

14. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 1998 192 

15. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 2025 194 

16. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 2053 196 
Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use 

Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

By William D. Watson, Antoinette L. Medlin, Kathleen K. Krohn, David S. Brookshire,1 

and Richard L. Bernknopf 

Abstract 

Current regulations on land use in the Western 

United States affect access to surface minable coal 

resources. This U.S. Geological Survey study analyzes the 

long-term effects of Federal land-use restrictions on the 

national cost of meeting future coal demands. The analysis 

covers 45 years. 

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management has determined the environmental, aesthetic, and economic values 

of western Federal coal lands and has set aside certain 

areas from surface coal mining to protect other valued 

land uses, including agricultural, environmental, and aesthetic uses. Although there are benefits to preserving 

natural areas and to developing areas for other land uses, 

these restrictions produce long-term national and regional 

costs that have not been estimated previously. 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model integrates coal 

supply (coal resource tonnage and coal quality by mining 

cost for 60 coal supply regions) with coal demand (in 243 

regions) for the entire United States. The model makes it 

possible to evaluate the regional economic impacts of coal 

supply restrictions wherever they might occur in the 

national coal market. The main factors that the economic 

methodology considers are (1) coal mining costs, (2) coal 

transportation costs, (3) coal flue gas desulfurization 

costs, (4) coal demand, (5) regulations to control sulfur 

dioxide discharges, and (6) specific reductions in coal 

availability occurring as a result of land-use restrictions. 

The modeling system combines these economic factors 

with coal deposit quantity and quality information-which 

is derived from the U.S. Geological Survey's National Coal 

Resources Data System and the U.S. Department of Energy's Demonstrated Reserve Base-to determine a balance 

between supply and demand so that coal is delivered at 

minimum cost. 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

Current regulations on land use in the Western United 

States affect access to surface minable coal resources. This 

Manuscript approved for publication July 28, 1989. 1

University of Wyoming. 

study examines the long-term effects that these restrictions 

could have on the national cost of meeting future coal 

demands, including impacts on regional pattern~ of coal 

availability, production, and transportation. The analysis 

covers 45 years. 

Federal law requires the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to manage land under its jurisdiction to 

achieve multiple-use goals. BLM has determined the environmental, aesthetic, and economic values of western 

Federal coal lands and has set aside certain areas from 

surface coal mining to protect other valued land uses, 

including agricultural, environmental, and aesth~tic uses. 

Although there are benefits to preserving natural areas and 

to developing areas for other land uses, these mstrictions 

create long-term national and regional costs that have not 

been estimated previously. 

This study applies a model that integrates coal supply 

(coal resource tonnage and quality by mining cost for 60 

coal supply regions) with coal demand (in 243 re~ions) for 

the entire United States. This national model makes it 

possible to evaluate the regional economic effects of supply 

restrictions wherever they might occur in the naf<:mal coal 

market. The analytic framework measures the effects of 

land-use restrictions on coal resources over time. The main 

factors considered in the economic methodology are ( 1) 

coal mining costs, (2) coal transportation costs, (3) coal flue 

gas desulfurization costs, (4) coal demand, (5) mgulations 

to control sulfur dioxide discharges, and ( 6) specific reductions in coal availability occurring as a result o+' land-use 

restrictions. The modeling system developed for this study, 

called the Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM), combines these economic factors with coal deposit quantity and 

quality information derived from the U.S. Geological Survey's National Coal Resources Data System (NCRDS) and 

the U.S. Department of Energy's Demonstrated Reserve 

Base (DRB) to determine a balance between coal supply 

and demand so that coal is delivered at minimun cost. 

The study includes an empirical analy~is of the 

nation's cost to implement Federal land-use restictions in 

Executive Summary 
selected areas in the Western United States. The empirical 

analysis compares national coal delivery costs (the sum of 

coal extraction, transportation, and sulfur dioxide removal 

costs) under a base case (no land-use restrictions) with the 

costs that would occur under a suite of restricted cases. In 

the restricted cases, the study assumes that the specified 

land-use restrictions are in effect for 45 years. The land-use 

restrictions temporarily remove economically attractive coal 

deposits from future development, making it necessary to 

extract coal from more costly coal deposits. The same level 

of coal demands is met in the base and restricted cases but 

national coal delivery costs are higher for the restricted 

cases because of the need to extract coal from more costly 

coal deposits. The differences in national coal delivery 

costs, comparing base and restricted cases, are the esti~ 

mated costs of the land-use restrictions. 

The model quantifies the effects of land-use restric~ 

tions on coal supply under all of BLM's land-use planning 

screens. The screens include unsuitability criteria (for 

example, environmentally sensitive lands), multiple-use 

conflict (for example, oil and gas lands), and surface owner 

consent (private surface ownership covering Federal coal). 

Lands restricted exclusively under the unsuitability criteria 

(Office of the Federal Register, 1986, 43 CFR 3461.1) have 

an incremental cost (that is, additional national coal delivery costs), in present value terms, of about $1.1 billion or 

approximately 0.15 percent of the total market cost for the 

1985-2030 period. The incremental cost, in present value 

terms, of all the restrictions for 45 years (1985-2030) is 

about $3 billion (in 1985 dollars) or approximately 0.5 

percent of the total market cost for the period. 

Since the land-use restrictions are designed to be 

temporary, the study also evaluates the economic effects if 

certain land-use restrictions were removed at different 

dates. The incremental cost of land-use restrictions will 

increase as long as the temporary restrictions are kept in 

place and coal demands increase. Using DCAM, the study 

estimates that by the year 2000 the present value of the 

incremental cost of land-use restrictions under Federal 

unsuitability criteria for 45 years (2000-2045) would be 

about $4.7 billion. Between 2020 and 2065, the unsuitability criteria land-use restrictions could have an incremental 

cost of about $15.8 billion in present value terms. (The 

anchor year is 2020.) 

A summary of additional national coal delivery costs 

due to land-use restrictions, as estimated in this study, is as 

follows: 

Model time All restrictions Unsuitability 

period restrictions 

1985-2030 $3.0 $1.1 

2000-2045 Not estimated 4.7 

2020-2065 Not estimated 15.8 

The unsuitability restrictions above are calculated as 

the present discounted value in additional rational coal 

delivery costs, between a case with all restric6ms in place 

and an alternative case with all restrictions (except the 

unsuitability criteria restrictions) in place. T·e costs are 

given in 1985 dollars in billions, discounted to the initial 

year of each designated time period. 

In the empirical analysis, DCAM estimated shifts in 

regional coal production due to BLM's reftrictions by 

comparing regional coal production patterns between the 

base case (no restrictions) and the restrictr.d case (all 

Federal land-use screens are assumed to be in rlace). Some 

of the largest regional impacts occur in the P<:--wder River 

basin of Wyoming and Montana. The market finds this 

high-producing region very attractive because of low mining costs and low sulfur content, especially in the coal 

deposits in the Wyoming portion of the Powder River basin 

where current mining costs are $6.25 per ton (in 1985 

dollars) and sulfur contents are as low as 0.: percent by 

weight. Current BLM land-use restrictions are quite extensive in this coal basin. The restrictions' large areal extent 

could affect the current favorable economic co'lditions and 

may result in large production shifts in the Powder River 

basin. 

For the base case (no restrictions), the stu1y estimates 

that coal production in the Wyoming portion of the basin 

would grow from less than 140 million tons per year in 1985 

to about 360 million tons per year by 2025. In the restricted 

case, it is estimated that that same coal produ~tion would 

reach a peak level of about 280 million tons per year by 

2005 then fall to an annual production level c f about 140 

million tons by 2025. The reduction in cum'llative coal 

production from 1985 to 2030, due to land-use: restrictions 

in the Wyoming portion of the basin is estimat~d to be 3.5 

billion tons. The shift of 3.5 billion tons increrses national 

coal delivery costs as production is relocated to other, 

higher cost areas. Relocating production, beca·1se of landuse restrictions, accounts for a $3 billion n"'tional cost 

differential in present value terms. 

A significant proportion of the coal production lost in 

the Wyoming portion of the basin is shifted into the 

Montana portion. This shift occurs because mining costs 

and coal quality for available resources in Montana become 

more favorable (relative to other producing re.gions) after 

the BLM's land-use restrictions are applied. As DCAM 

estimated, cumulative coal production from 1985 to 2030 in 

the basin's Montana portion is increased by about 900 

million tons or approximately 25 percent of the: production 

lost in Wyoming. DCAM found the Wyoming to Montana 

coal production shift the largest shift that could occur when 

BLM' s land-use restrictions reduced the coal supply. The 

report summarizes the regional coal production shifts for all 

of the regions that BLM's land-use restrictions affect. 

The study assessed one set of BLM regulations that 

result from a specific land-use policy in specific resource 

2 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land~Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
management areas, but DCAM has many other uses. 

Additional applications could include "first cut" estimates 

of costs of long-term land-use policy decisions associated 

with the Federal coal leasing program or of costs associated 

with the following types of lands: those in U.S. national 

forests, those the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

withdrew to prevent deterioration of air quality and of 

visibility in the Western States, those withdrawn from 

mining due to hazards (subsidence and landslides), and 

those that are no longer accessible for mining (such as areas 

that cities and towns or creek and river beds occupy). 

INTRODUCTION 

The extraction, transportation, and consumption of 

coal resources is an integral part of the U.S. economy. Coal 

resources fuel a major portion of electric power generators, 

as well as industrial boilers and coking plants, and are 

exported. In 1986, the United States produced 890.3 

million short tons of coal; of that, 201.6 million tons, or 

22.6 percent, were produced on Federal lands (U.S. Department of Energy, 1988). Coal development on Federal lands 

has been, for the most part, in the Western States where 

there are significant quantities of low-sulfur coal resources 

(U.S. Department of the Interior, 1987). In recent years, as 

a result of Federal air quality legislation, developing lowsulfur western coal has been emphasized increasingly. As 

the development of western coal lands has proceeded, 

conflicts with other valued land uses has occurred. In fact, 

there has been a concerted Federal effort, in the form of 

legislation and regulations, to identify potential land-use 

conflicts and to restrict the availability and development of 

sensitive lands (Nelson, 1983). 

Environmental protection for Federal coal lands has 

been implemented mainly through the land-use planning 

procedures established in the Federal Land Policy and 

Management Act (FLPMA), which was enacted in 1976. 

Under FLPMA, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in 

the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOl) is required to 

prepare land-use plans for areas under Federal jurisdiction. 

One result of BLM's land-use planning procedure, detailed 

below, is that surface mining is restricted on significant 

amounts of Federal coal lands in the Western United States. 

In this regard, the general issue this report addresses is, 

what are the nation's opportunity costs or additional coal 

delivery costs as a result of BLM's land-use restrictions? 

Generally, the long-term effects of Federal government policies on coal markets, such as coal production 

restrictions, has been analyzed using cost-minimizing linear 

programs that forecast demand and supply patterns. 

Although models such as the ICF, Inc. (1980), Coal and 

Electric Utilities Model or the U.S. Department of Energy 

( 1984) National Coal Model are useful for forecasting 

national trends in coal production, they present a simplified 

description of how the coal market operates at discrete 

times. This type of model is not well suited for addressing 

regional (sub-State) issues or the role of resource depletion 

economic rents and dynamic constraints in determining coal 

allocation patterns. A model for long-term energy analysis 

related to the supply of coal must incorporate regio"'~al detail 

and time-dependent features if it is to be useful for policy 

assessment. 

This study extends the scope of previous ones by 

viewing the coal market as an intertemporal anrl interregional balance between demand and supply. A dynamic 

programming model, called the Dynamic Coal Allocation 

model (DCAM), is used to simulate the U.S. coal market. 

The solution to the model is a set of coal shipment~"'-- which 

were selected to minimize extraction, transportation, and 

sulfur dioxide scrubbing costs-from 60 supply regions to 

243 demand regions over 45 years. DCAM addresses 

long-term land-use planning by comparing the ircrease in 

national coal delivery costs of various environme'ltal preservation scenarios. Results (provided below) fall into three 

areas: (1) costs of meeting national coal demands when 

BLM land-use restrictions are not considered versus the 

costs when these restrictions are implemented starting in 

1985 in selected regions of the Western United ~<ates, (2) 

cost savings in meeting national coal demands assuming 

BLM land-use restrictions are removed in the ft'ture, and 

(3) a methodology that would allow BLM to compare 

specific land-use restrictions in specific regions to preserve 

environmental values at lowest cost. 

Even though this study focuses on land-use planning, 

the study can be viewed more broadly as a demon~tration of 

a method for analyzing the future effects of any sp~cified set 

of physical, regulatory, or financial constraints on the U.S. 

coal market. The method involves analyzing r resource 

market over several decades to understand the full implications of public policy decisions. This long-term focus is 

essential in describing the evolution of time-linked markets, 

such as the coal market, where today's decisbns affect 

future options and current economic conditions. 

At this time, it is impossible to predict the coal 

market's long-term future in any absolute sense. Discoveries and inventions, new institutional arrangements, and new 

views on social needs will alter the future. Such discontinuities in human history are never predictable; no recent 

methodological advances in computer simulation models or 

in traditional disciplines have changed this situati')n. On the 

other hand, implications of different courses of actions as 

they occur within specific contexts can be anal~rzed. New 

information about events that can alter the future market can 

then be incorporated into the analysis. Thus, this study 

should be viewed as part of an ongoing process of developing answers about future tradeoffs in the coal resource 

market. The specific results of this analysis are nost useful 

as illustrations of the methodology developed. 

lntro~uction 3 
The report is organized as follows. First. background 

information on regulations that affect Federal management 

of coal lands, in particular those regulations involved in 

land-use planning, is presented. The issue to be examined 

and the methods employed to estimate the tonnage of coal 

restricted by application of Federal coal-planning screens 

are described. Next. a conceptual framework for assessing 

tradeoffs between coal land preservation benefits and coal 

development benefits is provided. Following that, a 

description of DCAM presents the model's main features, 

including an objective function, constraints. and key conditions satisfied by the cost-minimizing coal allocation 

pattern determined in the model. The major data sets used in 

the analysis are then summarized. Finally, the results are 

presented and followed by a conclusion. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

This report is the result of a multiyear project that 

included significant contributions by a number of persons. 

Margaret Johnson undertook the difficult task of 

processing many of the data sets to estimate coal resources 

for the base and restricted cases. Her work was one of the 

most important contributions to the project. Brian Goudreau 

and Judith Hunter also processed coal data at various stages 

of the project. 

Linda Gheen digitized the land-use restrictions in the 

Wyoming portion of the Powder River basin and entered the 

digital data sets into a central computer bank. Meng-Cherng 

Sun helped to digitize the land-use restrictions in the 

Montana portion of the Powder River basin. Andre Bush 

digitized land-use restrictions in other western coal supply 

regions. This work, which required great skill and patience, 

made it possible to use geographic information systems 

technology to obtain the results. Without these efforts, 

completing the project would have been impossible. 

Throughout the project, Tod Huffman organized and 

analyzed data on a large mainframe computer. Joseph 

Aquilino and Cam Burgess also made important contributions in this area. 

Gerry Lebing developed computerized methods for 

preparing the more complicated graphs. Figures 1 , 2, 3, and 

4 in the final report would not have been possible without 

his help. Brian Schachte also helped with the computer 

derivation of quantitative estimates and their display. Lewis 

Boger and Sara Banks provided expert assistance in preparing the figures in the final report. 

The comments and advisory inputs of the following 

are especially noteworthy: Terry Offield on the executive 

summary, main report, and Appendix A; Carol Molnia for 

an extremely thorough review of the entire report; Emil 

Attanasi for insightful comments on economic matters; and 

M. Devereaux Carter on the interpretation of coal resource 

data. At the later stages of this project, Thomas Browne 

made important contributions on coal market economics. 

Wendy Budd understood the pioneering nature of 

computerizing mathematical programming and helped run 

the programs on the Survey's large mainfram ~ computer. 

Her support is appreciated. 

Special thanks go to Terry Offield for his support 

throughout the project. His interest in the study made it 

possible to obtain the resources and time ne~ded for the 

project. 

THE ISSUE 

Congress has enacted several laws this century that 

have guided policies associated with the disposal of coal 

deposits on public lands. Among others, the Mineral 

Leasing Act of 1920 and the Federal Coal Leas:ng Amendments Act of 1976 authorize the Department of the Interior 

to control most aspects of the development of Federal coal 

(Nelson, 1983). 2 Although the Department of the Interior 

has the power to control coal development tigh~Iy, Federal 

coal policy is structured so that prevailing market trends 

determine the amount of public resources available for 

development while maintaining the environmen~al integrity 

and highest and best use of the public lands. 

Because Federal coal lease planning is based on 

market principles, the quantity of coal made available for 

lease will depend on the industry's interest fo:-- additional 

resources in all Federal leasing areas. While mrrket participants determine how much coal on public lands is needed, 

there are locations where the Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM) temporarily removes significant quantities of Federal coal from the marketplace for alternative usr.~. Depending on the extent of supply restrictions based on Federal 

land-use planning, some form of resource reallocation 

among coal market participants can be expected. Removing 

these coal resources from potential development could have 

a lasting economic impact on the current and futnre national 

economy. Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (D~AM) can 

measure the national and regional opportunity C')Sts of this 

type of supply restriction for 45 years, starting in any given 

year. 

The basis for Federal land-use restrictiom lies in the 

public's desire to protect wildlife and other natnral assets. 

In the last two decades, the BLM has impl ~men ted a 

land-use planning evaluation procedure in response to the 

2

The Department of [the] Interior can determine wh:ch particular 

coal deposits will be developed by its decisions to lease or not to lease. 

Through "diligent development" and "continuous operation" requirements 

it can decide the time by which coal mining must begin and tl ·~ subsequent 

rate at which it takes place. A statutory requirement fo~ "maximum 

economic recovery" gives the Department control over the specific coal 

beds and the total amount of coal mined from a lease. Environmental 

controls and a general requirement for approval of the mining plan give the 

Department considerable influence over the kind of mini"g operation 

undertaken. (Nelson, 1983, p. 21-22.) 

4 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
requirements stipulated in the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976 (FLPMA), the Surface Mining and 

Reclamation Act of 1977, and the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969. This procedure culminates in a 

Resource Management Plan (RMP). As part of any given 

RMP process, certain land areas are identified for limited, 

restrictive, or exclusive use. One outcome of this process is 

that coal lands that are acceptable for further leasing 

consideration are identified. 

Lands that are subject to coal leasing as dictated 

under the mineral leasing laws are subject to the requirements of 43 CFR 3420.1. This regulation establishes a 

four-level screening process. The first screen identifies land 

with coal development potential. A second screen identifies 

lands that are environmentally sensitive and separates them 

from those identified in the first screen. These areas are 

considered unsuitable for surface mining and should be 

restricted lands. 3 A list of 20 unsuitability criteria (see table 

1) are applied to identify, and thus protect, the Federal 

lands' most sensitive and valuable features. 

The third screen identifies conflicts between coal 

development and the need to protect any other Federal, 

State, or local resource not included in the unsuitability 

criteria, such as areas for recreation and for extracting other 

resources, such as oil and gas. If the other resources are 

more important or the impacts cannot be mitigated, the coal 

lands are removed from further consideration for development. The fourth screen involves consulting with the 

surface land owners as to their preference regarding coal 

development. If a significant number of surface owners 

oppose mining operations, the area is considered suitable 

for underground mining only. 

Substantial amounts of cheap, low-sulfur coal found 

on Federal lands in places like the Powder River basin in 

Wyoming and Montana are subject to the screening process 

and the consequent land-use restrictions that can reduce 

potential coal development (Buffalo RMP, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1984a, and Powder River RMP, U.S. 

Department of the Interior, 1984b). Figure 1 illustrates the 

maximum extent of screens 2 and 3 (unsuitability criteria 

and multiple-use criteria) on the Powder River basin of 

Wyoming. 

In Wyoming, the Powder River basin contains a 

multitude of coal beds that extend from outcrops in Campbell and Converse Counties on the east and dip gently west 

through Sheridan and Johnson Counties. Figure 2 represents 

the extent of the Powder River coal basin (supply regions 67 

3

The BLM classifies lands as unsuitable for mining, suitable pending 

further study, and suitable for mining. This analysis assumed that lands 

unsuitable for mining and lands suitable for mining pending further study 

are removed temporarily from potential development-a worst case 

scenario. For further details on the BLM regulations, see Appendix C, 

BLM Land-Use Restrictions. 

Table 1. Unsuitability criteria applied to Federal coal 

lands 

Criterion Description 

Existing Federal lands systems such as the N~tional 

Park System and National Recreation Areas, as 

examples 

2 Existing rights-of-way and easements 

3 Buffer zones along rights-of-way and adjacent to communities and buildings 

4 Wilderness study areas 

5 Scenic areas 

6 Lands being utilized for scientific study 

7 Publicly owned places on Federal lands that are 

included in the National Register of Historic Places 

8 Federal lands designated as natural areas or as 

National Natural Landmarks 

9 Federally designated critical habitat for thrertened or 

endangered plant and animal species 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

Federal lands containing habitat determined to be critical or essential for plant or animal species listed 

under State law 

Bald or golden eagle nest or a buffer zone 

Bald and golden eagle migration and winter;ng areas 

on Federal lands 

Falcon nesting sites and buffer zones on Federal lands 

High-priority habitat for migratory bird species 

Fish and wildlife habitat for resident species on Federal lands, as determined by States 

Riverine, coastal, and special flood plans necessary to 

protect life and property 

Lands that the surface management agency has committed to use as municipal watersheds 

Federal lands with National Resource Wate-s as identified by States, and a buffer zone of Federal lands 

114 mile from the outer edge of the far ban":~ of the 

water 

Alluvial valley floor protection 

Proposed State restrictions on Federal landf 

and 96) in Wyoming. A substantial portion of the coal is 

surface minable, even though the beds dip west. Using a 

maximum depth of 250 feet as the surface minable cutoff, 

there are approximately 49.2 billion tons of surfaca. minable 

coal in the four counties. Figure 3 shows the areal extent of 

the strip minable coal resources in the Powder River basin 

in Wyoming. 

By combining restricted areas with areas of surface 

minable coal, the extent of the surface minable coal that 

The Issue 5 
0 

0 0 

D 

8 

0 Q c. 0 

Sh

0

eridan 

County 

Johnson 

County 

10 20 30 40 50 MILES 

N 

A 

< Campbell -county 

Area of Detail 

0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS State of Wyoming 

Figure 1. BLM coal land-use restrictions in the Powder River basin, Wyoming (supply regions 67 and 96). 

can be removed temporarily from production can be identified by acres and tons restricted. Figure 4 shows the 

maximum amount of coal lands that are surface minable 

after all of the BLM land-use planning screens have been 

imposed. After restricted lands are removed, 36.3 billion 

tons of coal can be surface mined. 

Although coal is an abundant resource, it has qualitative characteristics (for example, sulfur and Btu content) 

that can vary widely among different beds in a basin and 

among different basins. These variations govern coal deposits' attractiveness and usefulness in the marketplace. For 

example, restrictions that limit sulfur dioxide emissions 

(SOJ make low-sulfur coal deposits very attractive to U.S. 

coal markets. A significant portion of the coal resources 

found in the Western United States contain low amounts of 

sulfur and can be extracted at a relatively low cost. 

(Western surface mining is less costly than eastern underground mining.) Depending on where the low-sulfur coal 

deposits are located and where the land-use restrictions have 

been established, there will be some level of economic 

impact on the coal market because the availability of 

specific low-sulfur coal supplies will be reduced. 

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 

This portion of the report will discuss wl'~ther developing coal by removing land-use restrictions is preferable to 

keeping the restrictions in place. If withheld lands have 

attractive deposits (deposits that ordinarily would be 

stripped if restrictions were not in place), ther the mining 

costs on the restricted lands are less than or equal to the 

costs for coal being mined on unrestricted lands. Therefore, 

when restrictions are lifted, the coal could be mined less 

expensively than other accessible coal. These cost savings 

are referred to as coal development benefits. Ir contrast, if 

restrictions are kept, environmental assets (su~h as eagles 

and alluvial valley floors) would be preserved a,d values in 

the form of preservation benefits would ac~~rue to the 

public. So the question of when to removP. or retain 

restrictions depends on a comparison between coal development benefits and environmental preservatio"' benefits. 

The tradeoff between coal development and environmental preservation benefits can be examined by estimating 

the benefit function for coal development and the benefit 

function for environmental values preserved when coal is 

6 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Sheridan 

Big Horn 

Campbell 

Washakie 

Fremont Converse 

Area of Detail 

0 50 100 MILES N 

0 50 100 KILOMETERS 1\ 

State of Wyoming 

Figure 2. Extent of coal-bearing strata in the Powder River basin, Wyoming. 

not extracted. 4 The following function represents coal 

development benefits: 

V,= Voea' (1) 

V0 is the present value of development benefits at time 0 

discounted over some time period (for example, the 45 

years from 1985 through 2030). If V0 grows at rate a (where 

e, the exponential growth factor, equals 2.7183), then the 

present value of development benefits would be V, at time t. 

The growth rate a reflects the fact that V, always covers the 

same planning horizon . Figure 5 shows a plot of V,. At time 

t, the present value of coal development benefits (over the 

time period (t + 45)), is V,. Equation 1 has coal development benefits growing at a constant exponential rate a. An 

empirical estimate of the coal development benefits function, presented later with the results information , accords 

well with this simple functional form. 

A function for coal preservation benefits5 is 

4

Porter (1982, 1984) provides a similar framework to analyze 

tradeoffs between environmental preservation benefits and economic 

development benefits. ~ 

5

R, is determined as the integral of J, R0 e"'e - & 'dt. Thus, R, is the 

(2) 

Figure 5 also plots R,. If R0 (annual preservation 

benefit at time 0) is relatively large, then R, (as fig. 5 

shows) could exceed V, for a period of time. When this 

occurs, the present value of coal preservation benefits 

exceeds coal development benefits. The policy implication 

(in terms of economic tradeoffs) is clear: preserve the land 

to protect wildlife habitat and other environmental assets, 

and restrict coal development by setting aside lands from 

stripping operations. 

Once V, is greater than R,, the implication for policy 

is less clear. If a short-term decision is made, then coal 

development might be chosen. In the short term, coal 

development benefits exceed coal preservation benefits. If 

the extent of future technological change and the value of 

preservation benefits to future generations is uncertain, a 

present value at time t of preservation benefits growing from R0 (at time 0) 

by rate p. The discount rate is 8. The upper limit on the integral is oo in 

accordance with the assumption that preserved wildlife habitat provides 

benefits forever. If the upper limit is made t + 45 , equation 2 still remains 

a good approximation to the present value of preservation benefits for a 

45-year planning horizon, to accord witlf.flhe time frame of equation I. 

Conceptual Framework 7 
0 10 

Johnson 

County 

20 30 40 50 MILES N 

A 

Campbell 

County 

Area of Detail 

0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS State of Wyoming 

Figure 3. Coal lands in the Powder River basin, Wyoming (supply regions 67 and 96). 

logical decision could be to forego shorter term economic 

gains and not develop the lands (to avoid environmental 

effects). As a hypothetical situation, figure 5 shows 

renewed dominance of preservation benefits over development benefits in a later year. This second crossover at time 

t2 could occur as a result of (1) improved electric generation 

technology that reduces the requirements for coal (thus, 

lowering cost savings or benefits from coal development) 

and (2) more rapid growth in individuals' willingness to pay 

for preserved wildlife and aesthetics on coal lands as 

wildlife stocks and pristine areas dwindle elsewhere. 

These concepts provide a framework around which 

the empirical results are reported. However, estimating 

preservation benefits in dollar terms (as the current framework requires) is a major task in itself and beyond the scope 

of this analysis. There are some economic evaluations of 

wildlife preservation, but they focus on wilderness and 

wildlife in areas that are not applicable to this study. 6 

6

However, the existing studies demonstrate economic valuation 

procedures that are appropriate for establishing dollar values for preservation. See Walsh and others (1984), and Brookshire and others (1983). 

Consequently, this study's empirical focus is on the 

coal development benefits function. What are the Nation's 

dollar savings in coal delivery costs if the Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) removes coal land restrictions (in 

whole or in part) in 1985? Or in later years? For any 

particular level of protection for specific environmental 

assets, how can BLM manage coal land restrictions to 

achieve the protection at the lowest cost (in terms of 

national coal delivery costs)? 

THE DYNAMIC COAL ALLOCATION MODEL 

(DCAM) 

DCAM is a method to make a "first-cut" estimate of 

opportunity costs concerning long-term planning issues 

associated with coal development. DCAM has two important features that help to analyze coal allocation patterns and 

the opportunity costs of land-use restrictions realistically. 

First, DCAM has a high degree of regional detail. This 

feature allows disaggregated analysis and, thereby, credible 

evaluation of region-specific land-use restrictions. Second, 

DCAM represents the coal market as a dynamic, or time8 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
10 

0 10 20 

Johnson 

County 

20 30 40 

30 40 50 KILOMETERS 

50 MILES N 

A 

Campbell 

County 

Area of Detail 

State of Wyoming 

Figure 4. Coal lands available for mining after applying BLM's land-use screens in the Powder River basin, Wyoming 

(supply regions 67 and 96). 

Development 

Benefits (Vt ) 

Preservation 

Benefits (Rt) 

Develop 

L-___J_-----r-:::::::::==::::::::::~ 

Preserve 

0 

I 

I Preserve 

1--+ 

I 

Figure 5. The tradeoff between developing and preserving coal lands. 

dependent, allocation system. Consequently, DCAM determines future opportunity costs or coal scarcity rents endogenously because they play a key role in determining the 

pattern of coal production over time, in correspondence 

with actual market processes. 

DCAM allocates coal in the United States over 45 

years 7 to minimize total mining, transportation, and scrubbing costs (in present value terms) while meeting projected 

coal demands and operating within allowable SOx emission 

standards, available supplies of minable coal, and shipping 

capacities for river locks and transmission lines. DCAM 

assumes technological change in coal production. Productivity improvements are incorporated at a level that keeps 

aggregate national average coal mining costs constant 

(consistent with recent historic performance). DCAM, 

though, assumes no technological change in coal distribution or uses. However, in the out years, the model includes 

production of synthetic fuels from coal. DCAM has these 

main structural features: 

7 A 45-year planning horizon is long enough to measure virtually all 

of the discounted cost differences between alternative policy cases. Any 

values beyond the 45-year horizon would be very small due to discounting. 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) 9 
• 60 coal supply regions, each represented by a step 

function of up to 12 steps relating minable tonnage to 

mining cost by sulfur and Btu content, 

• 243 coal consuming markets that represent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional air sheds 

(AQCR's-air quality control regions), each having one 

or more of eight possible types of coal demand, including electric utility and industrial boiler demands, export 

demands, metallurgic demands, and synfuel demands, 

• 5 modes of coal transportation: mixed freight rail, unit 

train, waterway, intermodal transshipments between 

water and rail, and electric transmission lines (mine 

mouth power plants generate electricity that is shipped 

as tonnage equivalents over high-voltage transmission 

lines), and 

• 6 planning periods spanning 45 years. (In the discussion 

on results for the base and restricted cases, each time 

period is represented by its central year-1988, 1993, 

1998, 2005, 2015, and 2025.) 

DCAM uses equation 3a to estimate the minimum 

total cost of coal market transactions (represented as the 

objective function K) for all i origins and j destinations 

subject to a set of constraints (conditions 3b-3e) imposed on 

coal market transactions: T 

min K = ~c ~ s- Te, (x,, z,)+ n, (x,, z,) + b, (x,, z,)] (3a) 

subject to o.xr~Dr 

where 

~xr~0.0072Dt 

Xr~L 

Xr~Et 

xt~o 

(Pr) 

(Br) 

(Cr) 

(Mr) 

(3b) 

(3c) 

(3d) 

(3e) 

K =total cost of extracting, transporting, and scrubbing 

coal for 45 years 

r=0.8, the rate of discount 

T =final year in the planning horizon 

er =cost of extraction in time t ($/ton) 

Xr =tons of coal extracted in a time period t 

Zr =cumulative extraction up to t 

nr =cost of transportation in time t ($/ton) 

br =cost of scrubbing coal at a market in time t($/ton) 

a =factor to convert coal in actual tons to coal in 

normal tons, in terms of Btu ((Btu/toni) 

/24,000,000) 

Dr =coal demand at each destination in normal tons 

(tons containing 24,000,000 Btu/ton) 

~ =fraction of sulfur in the coal by weight at the coal 

origin adjusted for sulfur removal by scrubbing 

0.0072=EPA regulations (new source performance standards) for sulfur discharges at a consumption market 

(tons of sulfur per normal ton of coal) 

L =capacity in tons at a waterway lock 

Er =electric transmission line capacity (tons of coal 

equivalent) 

The constraints and their dual variables (symbols in 

parentheses on the right side of the inequalities) have the 

following interpretations: 

• Inequality 3b. Coal shipments (transformed into Btu 

units by a) must be large enough to satisfy demand (in 

Btu units = Dr). Pr is the market clearing price of coal. 

Pr is estimated to be the change in the objective function 

if demand is changed by one unit. 

• Inequality 3c. Tons of sulfur discharged cannot exceed 

the demand region's SOx limits. The factor ~ converts 

coal to tons of sulfur; it equals the sulfur fraction (by 

weight) of coal adjusted by sulfur scrubbing removal 

percentage. The factor 0.0072 converts demand (in Btu 

terms) into tons of sulfur allowed under a Federal new 

source performance standard (NSPS) of 1.2 lbs of SOx 

per million Btu. 8 Br is the market clearing price that can 

be charged for each ton of sulfur emitted. DCAM 

estimates the change in the objective function if the 

sulfur limit is changed by 1 ton. In other words, B1 is the 

marginal opportunity cost of satisfying an SOx discharge limit. 

• Inequality 3d. Tons of coal shipped cannot exceed 

waterway lock capacities L. ct is the market clearing 

price that the U.S. Corps of Engineers can charge for 

each ton of coal shipped through river locks that have 

reached their capacity. DCAM estimates the change in 

the objective function if lock capacity is changed by 1 

ton. Thus, Cr is the marginal opportunity cost of river 

lock capacity if locks are utilized fully. 

• Inequality 3e. Tons of coal shipped cannot exceed 

electric transmission capacities E1• Similar to dual 

values of Cr and Mf' E1 is the marginal opportunity cost 

of mine mouth power plant transmission line capacity, 

when transmission lines are utilized to full capacity. 

A coal shipment must satisfy the following condition 

to be in DCAM's solution set: 

P (1 + )

r- 1_1 [aer ant abt r -- -+-+-

t a axt axt axt 

(4a) 

(4b) 

8

0ther Federal SOx standards are implemented: (1) by shipping coal 

only from certain supply regions that can satisfy State Implementation Plan 

standards and (2) by always scrubbing coal to satisfy SOx standards for 

boilers under Revised New Source Performance Standards (discussed 

further in the portion on data sources). 

10 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
where 

1/a =factor to convert right side values into $/ton of 

coal containing 24-million Btu/ton and 

(1 +rY- 1=factor to move discounted values forward to 

obtain undiscounted values in year t. 

The right side of expression 4a is the sum of marginal coal 

extracting, transporting, and scrubbing costs. Expression 4b 

is static economic rent associated with SOx, lock, and 

transmission capacities. Expression 4c is dynamic coal 

scarcity rent or the present value of future costs resulting 

from current extraction. 9 These scarcity rents, calculated by 

DCAM, provide an economic cost that links development 

of coal deposits across time with actual market clearing 

processes. 

The sum of all terms on the right side of equation 4 is 

full marginal cost. By equation 4, a coal shipment can enter 

the optimal solution at a tonnage value above zero only if its 

full marginal cost equals the demand region's market price 

(demand shadow value). Also, by equation 4, coal received 

at a demand region from different supply regions must have 

the same delivered cost in dollars per unit of Btu. Appendix 

A contains DCAM's complete mathematical derivation, 

including a modular construction of how the model's 

individual parts fit together. 

DATA SOURCES 

To conduct a simulation that examines an individual 

policy, such as BLM's long-term land-use plans, DCAM 

needs several types of information. This portion of the 

9

Static economic rents are the cost savings provided by a scarce 

resource (such as the environment's limited SOx assimilative capacity) 

compared to the next best alternative (such as a stack gas scrubber installed 

to reduce SOx discharges). The term "static" refers to the fact that the 

resource constraint which limits economic choices is reached within a short 

time, such as a year. For example, there is no cumulative build-up (over a 

number of years) of SOx discharges in the atmosphere. Instead, the 

atmosphere can assimilate SOx emissions by recycling SOx to other natural 

sinks (land, water, and vegetation). Thus, the atmosphere can absorb a 

steady year-by-year flow of SOx discharges up to the limits of its 

renewable assimilative capacity. Until that annual limit is reached, the coal 

market (as simulated by DCAM) is not forced onto the higher cost options 

required once the assimilative capacity is reached. The atmosphere's 

capacity to assimilate SOx discharges is the static rent that accrues to 

theassimilative capacity. A dynamic rent, like a static rent, is a measure of 

cost savings that a particular resource (such as limited amounts of 

low-sulfur coal) can provide compared to the next best alternative. 

However, in contrast to a static rent, a dynamic rent occurs over a number 

of years and arises because a limited, nonrenewable resource is being used 

up. For example, a specific block oflow-sulfur coal can be depleted, never 

to be renewed. To meet demands, the coal market then brings the next 

lowest cost coal deposit into production. The discounted increase in costs 

avoided (a cost savings) due to the availability of the low-sulfur coal is the 

dynamic rent for the specific low-sulfur deposit. Static and dynamic rents 

are the increases in costs (associated with moving to the next best 

alternative) that occur when a renewable flow capacity (static rent) and a 

nonrenewable stock capacity (dynamic rent) are reached. 

BLM Land-Use Mining Cost 

Restrictions Model 

l J 

Mineable Coal Mineable Coal Regional Coa1 

E-- Resource Base --.;. Resource Base 4 Tonnage by 

(No (After Restric- Mining Cost 

Restrictions) tions Applied) for Different 

Sulfur and fEBtu Contents 

~ sox 

Scrubbing ~ DCAM 1 ,__ _____________ 

Requires Data for Supply H Coal 

Demand, Transport, SOX Transport 

Scrubbing & SOX Discharge 

Limits 

J I 

Coal 

I 

sox 

Demand Discharge 

I 

Limits 

I 

Figure 6. DCAM data required. 

report summarizes the types of data compiled to afsess the 

economic impact of Federal land-use restrictions. The data 

sets compiled for DCAM include all those outlined in figure 

6. Analyzing other policy issues may require substituting 

alternative data sets. Appendixes B through I detail how to 

use the necessary data to examine a supply restriction issue. 

Coal Supply 

The minable coal resource base is a county-level 

compilation of coal resource tonnage estimates mlit into 

underground and surface minable categories. For most 

supply regions, the Demonstrated Reserve Bas~ (DRB) 

published by the U.S. Department of Energy ( 1982a, 

1982b, 1982c, and 1986) provided the estimates DCAM 

uses. However, in selected regions of the Western United 

States (shown in fig. 7) where the BLM has applied 

land-use restrictions, the DRB estimates of surface minable coal have been replaced with estimates from the 

National Coal Resources Data System (NCRDS), 'national 

geographic information system (GIS) maintained by the 

U.S. Geological Survey. 

NCRDS contains point-located coal thick"ess and 

depth data. The first step in estimating surface minable 

coal resources, using NCRDS, is to define surface minable 

coal as being all coal beds no deeper than 250 feet. The total 

Data Sources 11 
I 

I 

/ 

-" 

0 

ND 

I --~-, -· 

EXPLANATION N 

Region boundaries A 

State boundaries 

Figure 7. Western coal supply regions where BLM has 

applied land-use restrictions. 

thickness data of coal 250 feet deep or less are then 

contoured to produce a coal thickness map. Applying a 

density factor (tons per acre-foot) to coal thickness by areal 

extent estimates each region's total surface minable coal 

tonnage. The NCRDS estimates are larger and considered 

more credible than the DRB estimates (see table 2) because 

the NCRDS bases its estimates on geographically located 

data and geotechnical analysis. 

This study evaluated how the BLM land-use restrictions in the 12 western coal supply regions (shown in fig. 

7) affected coal tonnage. 10 To accomplish this evaluation, 

the boundaries of the areas restricted under the various 

BLM categories were digitized and entered into the 

NCRDS. New estimates of coal tonnage, excluding the 

10Some additional areas in Colorado were not analyzed because BLM 

has not finished applying its coal land-use screens. The restricted tonnage 

in the additional areas is likely to be small. 

Table 2. Surface minable coal in Western United States 

coal supply regions affected by BLM's land-use restrictions 

(million short tons) 

Estimate Estimate 

Supply region used in used in 

DCAM ORB 

67. Sheridan & Johnson Counties, Wyo. 11,6001 1,244 

68, Rock Springs, Wyo. 1,9541 1,125 

75, Forsyth, Mont. 855 1 507 

80, Minot, N.Dak. 2,1302 1.201 

90, San Juan County, N. Mex. 8,2861 2,221 

91, McKinley County, N.Mex. 740 1 277 

92, Carbon County, Wyo. 6.4781 522 

93. Moffat & Routt Counties, Colo. 3,8533 3,853 

94, Sweetwater County, Wyo. 1,2553 1,255 

95, Powder River basin, Mont. 4 82,9851 42,518 

96, Powder River basin, Wyo. 5 37,6001 22,486 

98, Fort Union, N. Dak. 15,6202 8,634 

1

Estimated using data from the National Coal Resources Data 

System. The tonnage estimates include total coal thickn~ss, for all coal 

beds no deeper than 250 feet for all types of land ownerfhip. 2

Estimated by the Bureau of Land Management (U.S. Department of 

the Interior, 1986). 3

Demonstrated Reserve Base estimates. 

~rent (1986) estimated unleased Federal strippab1e coal (up to a 

stripping ratio of lO:l) in the Montana portion of the Po~·der River basin 

to be about 38 billion tons, assuming a recovery factor of 85 percent. 

Consequently. unrecovered coal (in the ground) is estimated to be about 45 

billion tons. This estimate can be adjusted up to 67 billion tons by 

accounting for coal occurrences on non-Federal lands. (More than onethird of surface minable coal lands in the Montana portion of the Powder 

River basin are under non-Federal ownership.) This study's estimate of 

about 83 billion tons is comparable to the adjusted estimate of 67 billion 

tons. 5

This study's estimate of strip minable coal for the Wyoming portion 

of the Powder River basin (supply regions 67 and 96) is about 50 billion 

tons compared to Trent's (1986) estimate of 80 billion tons. However, 

Trent includes coal as deep as 500 feet whereas this study includes coal as 

deep as 250 feet. Since the Wyoming portion of the basin (unlike the 

Montana portion) has abundant coal 250 to 500 feet dowr. it is expected 

that this study's estimate for the Wyoming portion will be l~ss than Trent's 

estimate. 

restricted areas as designated in the BLM Re~ource Management Plans (see Appendix C for further d:tails), were 

then made. 

Table 3 shows the estimates of coal tonnage for each 

of the 12 regions. The estimates in the base case column 

assume unrestricted land use. The estimates in the restricted 

case column show the tonnage available aft~r all BLM 

screens (unsuitability criteria, multiple use, and surface 

owner consent) were applied. National surface minable 

tonnage is reduced by 67 billion tons, or l:'v about 27 

percent of the unrestricted national total. The estimates in 

the final column show the available tonnage if the unsuitability criteria restrictions are lifted. Comp1red to the 

middle column, an additional 14 billion tons of coal are 

made available for lease and production when the unsuit12 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
table 3. Surface minable coal resources, alternative land-use restriction cases (million short tons) 

Unsuitability 

Supply region Base case 

Restricted criteria 

case1 restrictions 

eliminated 

67, Sheridan & Johnson Counties, Wyo. 11,600 9,700 11,289 

68, Rock Springs, Wyo. 1,954 1,950 1,950 

75, Forsyth, Mont. 855 460 465 

80, Minot, N.Dak. 2,130 1,360 1,640 

90, San Juan County, N. Mex. 8,286 8,210 8,264 

9L McKinley County, N.Mex. 740 740 740 

92, Carbon County, Wyo. 6,478 4,300 5.940 

93, Moffat & Routt Counties, Colo. 3,853 3.750 3,800 

94, Sweetwater County, Wyo. 1,255 1,170 1,240 

95, Powder River basin, Mont. 82,985 40,200 43,466 

96, Powder River basin, Wyo. 37,600 26,600 30,800 

98, Fort Union, N. Dak. 15,620 7,900 10,700 

Total 173,356 106,340 120,294 

National Surface Resources 244,501 177,489 191,443 

1

In supply regions 80, 93, 94, and 98, estimates of coal resources for the restricted case are based on a proportion of 

the number of acres in the restricted case relative to the base case for each resource management area. The base case tons (from 

table 2) are multiplied by this proportion to estimate a restricted case tonnage for each of these supply regions. The estimates of 

base case tons and acres for the base and restricted cases are taken directly from the relevant BLM resource management plans. 

ability criteria restrictions are lifted but the multiple use and 

surface owner consent restrictions are maintained. 

Regional coal supply is represented in a series of step 

functions that shows tonnage at a specified Btu and sulfur 

content for a given mining cost. The mining cost, estimated 

in a cost engineering model, is determined on the basis of 

seam depth, seam thickness, overburden ratios (for surface 

minable coals only), mine size distribution, recovery 

factors, and financial factors. Supply schedules are compiled, with and without land-use restrictions, for each 

region (see Appendix D for details). Figure 8 shows the 

supply schedules for most of the Powder River basin 

(regions 95 and 96), with and without land-use restrictions. 

The land-use restrictions reduce the amount of coal available at each step of the supply schedule. For example, in 

region 95, there are about 60 billion tons of coal available 

at a mining cost of $25 per ton or less. When land-use 

restrictions are implemented, the available tonnage in this 

price range is reduced to about 32 billion tons. 

SOx Regulations 

DCAM incorporates three sets of environmental regulations to limit sulfur dioxide discharges in accordance 

with Federal and State pollution control regulations (see 

Appendix H for details). The regulations are those established under State Implementation Plans (SIP), Federal new 

source performance standards (NSPS), and Federal revised 

new source performance standards (RNSPS) (see table 4). 

DCAM tracks coal going to SIP boilers using a 1985 

inventory of coal shipments to SIP boilers, a tally of the 

years when boilers came on-line, and a boil~r ageutilization schedule. In DCAM, SIP boilers are req-Iired to 

receive coal from the same supply regions as they did in 

1985. The coal shipped from the fixed supply regions is 

required to have a sulfur level that meets the regional SIP 

limit. NSPS standards are met in DCAM by burning 

low-sulfur coal, installing stack gas scrubbers, or by mixing 

control strategies. At the demand region (point of coal 

combustion), SOx discharges in the DCAM runs cannot 

exceed the NSPS limit of 1.2 lb of SOx per millhn Btu. 

RNSPS boilers are required to remove at least 70 percent of 

SOx from their stack gas, ranging up to a removal level in 

excess of 90 percent to meet specific discharge limits (refer 

to table 4). When SOx scrubbing is required (for RNSPS 

boilers) or scrubbing is the lowest cost (for NSPS boilers), 

DCAM adds an appropriate scrubbing charge to coal 

delivery costs. Appendix E describes the cost engineering 

model DCAM uses to estimate SOx scrubbing cost. 

Coal Transportation 

DCAM has more than 5,000 coal transpo't rates, 

covering 5 transport modes, from its supply regio'ls to its 

demand regions. Unit trains are allowed as a transport mode 

only if annual shipments exceed 500,000 tons. DCAM has 

a network for waterway transportation to track barge shipments through locks which have limited capacity. The 

model identifies certain electric transmission corridors, and 

transport of coal equivalents from mine mouth electric 

generation plants is limited to these corridors (see A upendix 

F for details). 

Data Sources 13 
Powder River Basin in Wyoming (supply region 96) 

40 

z 

0 

With land-use restrictions in place 

I-

~ 20 IJ') 

co 

0) 

- _r1 

No land-use restrictions 

0 

0 

_j L_ _____ 5_0L00 ______ 1_00L0_0 _____ 1_50L0_0 _____ 2~00L0_0 ____ ~~----~==----~~----4~f000 

MILLION TONS 

Powder River Basin in Montana (supply region 95) 

40 

With land-use restrictions in place 

z .-------- ---------c 

0 30 

I-

..._ 

~ 

IJ') 

~ 20 No land-use restrictions 

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 

MILLION TONS 

figure 8. Effect of BLM coal land-use restrictions on deliverable coal tonnage in the Powder River 

basin, Wyoming. 

Coal Demand 

DCAM includes a coal demand component. Demand 

is divided into eight types of coal utilization: (1) in SIP 

boilers to generate steam and heat for electric power 

production and (2) industrial uses, (3) in NSPS boilers to 

generate steam and heat for electric power generation and 

(4) industrial uses, (5) in RNSPS boilers to generate steam 

for electric power production, (6) for export to other 

countries, (7) for metallurgic uses, and (8) for conversion 

into syngas and synliquids. Figure 9 shows national coal 

demand projections for these six categories. Demand is 

entered into DCAM in units of Btu. To convert tons of coal 

shipped from supply regions into Btu units, a regional Btu 

factor is used to tally shipments against the demand target. 

Export and metallurgic demand is met only by low-sulfur 

and high-Btu content coals. Appendix I contains a detailed 

description of current demands and a derivation of projections for each demand region. 

RESULTS 

Following are the results generated by applying 

DCAM to the five pairs of alternative land-use restriction 

cases outlined in figure 10. 

The total discounted difference in extraction, transportation, and scrubbing costs (1985-2030) between the 

restricted and base cases is about $3 billion ( 1985 dollars). 

These additional national coal delivery costs result from 

having 67 billion fewer tons of surface minable coal 

available in the restricted case as compared to the base case 

(as table 3 showed). Figure 11 shows the annual cost 

difference. In the initial time period ( 1986-1990, plotted at 

year 1988) and until 1998, the annual cost difference is 

about $20 million. After 1998, the cost differ1~nce grows at 

about 17 percent per year and reaches $1.5 billion per year 

by 2025. The discounted sum (at 8 percent) of the area 

under the cost difference schedule is the present value 

difference of $3 billion. 

Figure 11 also shows the difference in revenues 

between the restricted and base cases. The re.venue difference includes the cost difference plus differe'lces in static 

rents (due to SOx discharge limits and lock and transmission 

capacity limits) and the difference in dynamic scarcity rents 

(due to economic coal depletion). If consumers paid all 

rents (for example, the consumers of coal-fired electric 

energy), then the revenue difference is the consumers' ' • . 11 additional outlay due to BLM s coal land-use restnct10ns. 

11 Rent capture or avoidance of rent payment dep~nds on market 

participants' bargaining strength. Consumers may not have to pay all ~nts. 

Therefore, the revenue difference in figure 11 is consumers' mrunmum 

additional outlay. 

14 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 4. SOx discharge limits for coal-fired boilers 

A. Electric Utility Boilers 

State Implementation Plans 

• Boilers with construction start-up dates earlier than August 1971 are 

required to meet the SIP standards of individual States. SIP's are 

established to meet national ambient air quality standards set in the 

Federal Clean Air Act. SIP standards vary by State and by boiler 

within a State. 

• Any method of compliance is allowed, including burning low-sulfur 

coal, SOx scrubbing, and combinations thereof. 

New Source Performance Standards 

• Boilers with construction start-up dates after August 1971 and before 

October 1978 are required to meet a Federal SOx discharge standard 

of 1.2 lb of S02 per million Btu heat input. Any method of compliance is allowed, including burning low-sulfur coal, SOx scrubbing, 

and combinations thereof. 

Revised New Source Performance Standards 

• A Federal regulation requires boilers with construction start-up dates 

after October 1978 to apply flue gas desulfurization technology (currently SOx scrubbing) to remove a minimum of 70 percent of S02 

from the boiler flue gas. Scrubbing at less than 90 percent (but no 

less than at 70 percent) is allowed if a discharge standard of 0.6 lb of 

S02 per million Btu heat input can be met. If the scrubbing removal 

level is 90 percent or higher, boilers are allowed to discharge 1.2 lb 

of S02 per million Btu heat input. 

B. Industrial Boilers 

State Implementation Plans 

• Boilers on-line prior to 1985 are required to meet individual State SIP 

standards. 

• Small boilers (heat input not more than 25,000 tons of coal per year 

containing 24 million Btu per ton) are required to meet SIP standards 

in all years. This applies to small boilers on-line prior to and after 

1985. 

New Source Performance Standards 

• Large boilers, on-line after 1985, are required to meet a Federal discharge standard of 1.2 lbs of S02 per million Btu heat input. Large 

boilers are defined as boilers with a heat input greater than 25,000 

tons of coal per year containing 24 million Btu per ton. Any method 

of compliance is allowed, including burning low-sulfur coal, SOx 

scrubbing, and combinations thereof. 

The coal market (as DCAM simulates) anticipates the future 

effects of reduced coal supplies due to land-use restrictions. 

Early on, rents begin to rise so that the attractive coal 

remaining after implementing the restrictions (such as in 

Powder River basin, Wyoming coal) is allocated slower 

(compared to the base case) to achieve minimum national 

coal delivery costs. Higher rents are the economic incentive 

to achieving this desirable outcome. In 1988, the revenue 

difference is $400 million per year in 1985 dollars. The 

annual revenue difference increases over time at a rate of 

6. 3 percent and reaches $4 billion by the year 2025. 

3500 

3000 

2500 a: 

~ ~ 2000 1-

z 

0 

:::::i 1500 ...J 

~ 

1000 

500 

EXPLANATION 

• .!!£._ 

0~~-

• ~~P!.. 

0. ~~P ... 

met D.---

X~--· 

\7 ..!~t!l!..-

YEAR 

Figure 9. National projections of coal demand. 

In the DCAM solution, coal demand equals snpply in 

each regional demand market. Figure 12, part A, shows a 

demand curve, 12 a supply curve, and a step cost function for 

a particular coal demand market. The units on the vertical 

axis are dollars per ton (1985 dollars); the units on the 

horizontal axis are tons per year. The step cost schedule 

shows delivered cost (the sum of mining, transporting, and 

scrubbing costs) for each ton of coal delivered to the 

market. Static and dynamic rents (in 1985 dollars per ton) 

are added to the step cost schedule to obtain the supply 

schedule (that is, full marginal costs for each ton). The 

market clears where the demand and supply schedules 

intersect at price p* and quantity q*. Figure 12, part B, 

shows what happens to market equilibrium when land-use 

restrictions raise delivered costs and rents. The s~hedules 

subscripted with b represent a base case without restrictions; 

those subscripted with r represent a case when land-use 

restrictions limit coal access and increase delive~ed coal 

costs. The base case schedules are duplicates of th~ schedules in part A of figure 12. 

Land-use restrictions limit coal access and increase 

delivered costs. Since only certain regions have land-use 

restrictions, delivered costs do not increase for eve.ry block 

of coal entering a regional market. The single cross-hatched 

area in figure 12, part B, represents an increase in total 

delivered coal costs due to land-use restrictions. The land12The demand curve is vertical because coal demand is determined 

outside DCAM and brought to the Market Simulation Model as a constraint 

(see appendixes A and I for details). 

Results 15 
Restricted { Case 

vs. 

Base 

Case 

Uft ( Unsuitability 

Criteria LandUse Restrictions in 1985 

Uft ( Unsuitability 

Criteria LandUse Restrictions in 2000 

Lift ( Unsuitability 

Criteria LandUse Restric· 

tions in 2010 

Lift ( Unsuitability 

Criteria LandUse Restrictions in 2020 

All LUR 

1985 No LUR 

AIILUR 

UCR Lifted 1985 All Other 

LUR 

AIILUR 

1985 All LUR 2000 

AIILUR 

1985 AIILUR 

AIILUR 

AIILUR 

1985 

Beginning year for 

45-year planning 

horizon. All 

2030 costs discounted 

back to this year. 

LUR Land-use 

restrictions 

UCR Unsuitability 

criteria land-use 

restrictions 

2030 

AIILUR 

UCR Lifted 2045 All Other 

LUR 

2010 

AIILUR 

UCR Lifted 2055 All Other 

LUR 

AIILUR 

UCR Lifted 

2020 All Other 2065 

LUR 

Figure 10. Alternative land-use restriction cases. 

use restrictions also raise rents to slow the extraction rate of 

the now-more-limited, economically attractive coal deposits. When higher rents are added to a higher delivered cost 

schedule (for the last block of coal to enter the market), the 

supply schedule is raised and the equilibrium coal price 

goes up to Pr- Every ton delivered to the market is sold at 

the new price. Consequently, after land-use restrictions are 

implemented, revenues increase in the amount represented 

by the double cross-hatched area in part B of figure 12. 

Figure 12 demonstrates why coal revenues (or consumer payments) can increase by more than delivered costs 

when land-use restrictions are implemented. As shown, all 

coaL irrespective of whether land-use restrictions limit its 

access, can earn higher rent after the restrictions are 

applied. In contrast, delivered costs increase only for those 

coal supply regions that land-use screens affect directly. 

The DCAM estimates-the difference in annual revenues 

being larger than the difference in annual delivered costs 

-are consistent with the results shown in figure 12. 

These comparisons show that the opportunity cost of 

BLM's coal land restrictions are modest until the mid1990's. Thereafter, annual opportunity costs grow at rates 

approaching 17 percent. Revenue differences, in contrast, 

already approach several hundred million dollars per year 

for coal consumers and could climb to as much as $4 billion 

per year by 2025. 

~ 2500 

(J) 

5 2000 1-

z 

g 1500 

...J 

~ 1000 

500 

0 

... / [3------' 

.,;"' 

Revenue difference 

.,...,. ... ..-- ..--

.,...,. "' Cost difference 

..-~ 

-500 '-----'----'---......1.....--!__-__l_ __ L __ _L _ __j 

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 

YEAR 

Figure 11. Revenue and cost differences, re~tricted case 

over base case. 

Table 5 shows regional coal produ ~tion shifts, 

restricted versus base case. The biggest d~creases, as 

DCAM simulated, occur in part of the Powder River basin 

in Wyoming. (Production has a net reduction in regions 67 

and 96.) Cumulative coal output (1985-2030) in the Powder 

River basin, Wyoming, falls by 3.5 billion tons as a result 

of BLM's land-use restrictions. Surprisingly, one of the 

biggest gainers is the Powder River basin in Montana. 

Although this region has a large amount of restricted coal, 

it contains a larger resource base and mo .. e favorable 

economics compared to the coal available afte .. restrictions 

in the Powder River basin, Wyoming. Cumulrtive production in Powder River basin, Montana, incre~ses by 879 

million tons. As table 5 indicates, coal production lost due 

to the land-use restrictions in North Dakota and Wyoming is 

picked up in roughly equal shares by increased output in the 

Eastern United States, Colorado, New Mexico, and the 

Northern Great Plains. 

Figures 13 and 14 provide a time profil ~ of production shifts in Wyoming and Montana. As figure 13 indicates, the rate of production begins to fall off in Wyoming 

beginning about 1995, but the biggest differences occur 

after 2005. In the base case, Wyoming coal production 

decreases slightly for about 10 years beyond 2005 and then 

increases. In the restricted case, Wyoming coal production 

reaches a peak annual production of 300 millior; tons around 

2005, then declines steadily thereafter. In Montana (see fig. 

14), coal production increases substantially in the base and 

restricted cases from 1985 to 2030. But after 2000, coal 

production grows faster in the restricted case because the 

Powder River basin of Montana is a production gainer when 

BLM's land-use restrictions are kept. 

Figure 11 indicates that BLM's coal land restrictions 

have opportunity costs after 1998, but the figure falls short 

16 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
A. 

1985 $ 

per 

ton 

Demand 

p * 1---------------+- supply b 

B. 

p* 

1985 $ 

per 

ton 

I 

0 

0 

1

..----+- Delivered 

costs b 

q*tons/year 

Supplyr 

Supplyb 

177~7/.7'7';'77+- De I i v e red 

costs r 

Delivered 

costs b 

q*tons/year 

Figure 12. Revenue and cost increases at market equilibrium after implementing land-use restrictions. 

of providing a tradeoff schedule to show economic gains for 

removing land-use restrictions at different dates. Such a 

schedule-a coal development benefits function-was discussed earlier, with the conceptual framework material. An 

empirical estimate of the coal development benefits function, determined by applying DCAM to the four pairs of 

land-use restriction cases that involve eliminating unsuitability criteria land-use restrictions at different points in 

time (bottom four sets of cases in fig . 10), exemplifies this. 

For each specific year (1985, 2000, 2010, 2020) 

when unsuitability criteria restrictions are assumed lifted, 

coal delivery cost savings are projected for 45 years beyond 

the decision year. Lands that are otherwise restricted by 

applying the unsuitability criteria are available for coal 

development in this time period. 13 Land-use restrictions 

under the multiple use and surface owner consent screens 

are assumed to remain in force. 

13 A 45-year planning horizon allows for the normal development of 

a coal mine, including at least a 5-year design period followed by mining 

operations for 30 or more years. Coal mining, especially surface mining, 

Table 5. Coal production shifts, restricted versus base 

case 

[Excludes shifts of less than 50 million tons. Reduction in tonnage is larger 

than increase in tonnage because coal Btu content in regions where 

production increases is less than coal Btu content in regions where 

production falls.] 

Supply regions 

Change in tons of 

coal mined, 

1985-2030, in 

millions of 

cumulative tons 

(negative values in 

parentheses) 

Supply regions with production increases 

Eastern United States 

3 Birmingham, Ala. 

10 Middlesboro, Ky. 

16 Pittsburgh, Pa. 

19 State College, Pa. 

21 Charleston, W. Va. 

26 Peoria, Ill. 

30 Tuscola, Ill. 

32 Sullivan, Ind. 

Total 

Texas 

40 San Antonio, Tex. 

Colorado and New Mexico 

61 Raton, N. Mex. 

62 Gunnison, Colo. 

90 San Juan County, N.Mex. 

93 Moffat and Routt Counties, Colo. 

Total 

Northern Great Plains 

66 Rawlins, Wyo. 

67 Sheridan and Johnson Counties, Wyo. 

95 Powder River basin, Mont. 

Total 

Grand Total 

Supply regions with production decreases 

Northern Great Plains 

80 Minot, N. Dale 

92 Carbon County, Wyo. 

96 Powder River basin, Wyo. 

98 Fort Union, N. Dale 

Total 

214 

80 

85 

240 

263 

130 

202 

164 

1,378 

163 

177 

362 

77 

355 

971 

108 

125 

879 

1,112 

3,624 

(88) 

(292) 

(3,600) 

(519) 

(4,499) 

This analysis provides the development benefits function shown in figure 15. DCAM's estimates of cost savings 

follow an exponential path so that the empirical function has 

the same form as the conceptual function presented earlier 

as equation 1. The baseline or comparison case is the 

restricted case (all BLM land restrictions in place). When 

is a large-scale and often capital-intensive undertaking. Commitments to 

open mines will be made only if there is adequate time for investments to 

reach fruition. 

Results 17 
450 

400 

350 

a: 

c 

If) 

z 300 0 

fz 

0 

::::; 250 --' 

~ 

200 

150 

........... - .... /""' ............. ......... . ' - Restncted 

-- 50L----L--~ ____ i_ __ _L ____ L_ __ _L __ ~--~ 

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 

YEAR 

Figure 13. Wyoming coal production, restricted versus 

base case. 

350 

300 

250 

a: 

c 

If) 

z 200 0 

fz 

0 

::::; 150 --' 

~ 

100 

50 

0 

1985 1990 1995 

Figure 14. Montana 

base case. 

; 

/ ; 

/ ; 

/ 

Restricted/"' 

; 

/ ; 

/. 

,.fl 

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 

YEAR 

coal production, restricted versus 

the unsuitability criteria restrictions are lifted, an additional 

14 billion tons of coal are available for development. Much 

of this coal is located in the Powder River basins of 

Wyoming and Montana (compare the middle and final 

columns in table 3). The coal has low mining cost and low 

sulfur content. Developing it reduces national coal delivery 

costs. Development benefits are estimated to be $1.1 billion 

(1985 dollars) if unsuitability criteria restrictions are lifted 

in 1985. Development benefits increase if the decision to 

lift the unsuitability criteria restrictions is delayed. Over 

time, coal demands are increasing and the coal resource 

base is being mined out in order of increasing cost. Thus, 

low-cost coal that the unsuitability criteria restrictions 

preserve could become increasingly attractive to the market. 

If) 

a: 

16 

14 

12 

:s 10 --' 

0 

Cl 

lll 8 

~ 

4 

V = 1.1exp(0.076(y-1985)) 

QL---~----_L ____ i_ ____ L_ __ ~ ____ _L __ __...J 

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 

YEAR (y) 

Figure 15. National cost savings (coal development benefits)-Schedules labeled as V's-from lifting restrictions 

imposed under unsuitability criteria (note: the lower 

schedule assumes productivity sufficient to keep average 

national coal mining costs constant; in this case coal 

development benefits grow at 6.3 percent per year). 

Consequently, as figure 15 indicates, development benefits 

from lifting the unsuitability criteria restrictions increase at 

a rate of7 .6 percent per year and reach nearly $16 billion by · 

the year 2020. 

The $1.1 billion estimate of the development benefits 

(unsuitability criteria restrictions lifted for 45 years starting 

in 1985) and the 7. 6 percent estimate of the development 

benefits' annual growth rate are derived from the DCAM 

estimates for 1985 ($1.1 billion), 2000 ($4.7 billion), 2010 

($8.6 billion), and 2020 ($15.8 billion). The initial cost 

savings and growth rate are the values needed to determine 

the empirical coal development benefit functions as shown 

in figure 15. 

As the conceptual framework discussion indicated, it 

is difficult to determine when it might be economically 

beneficial to extend or relax land-use restrictions, such as 

the unsuitability criteria restrictions. Reliable methods to 

estimate a preservation benefits function in dollar values are 

still being developed. Furthermore, uncertainty about the 

direction of change and magnitude of coal development and 

preservation benefits makes comparing preservation and 

development benefits difficult. 

However, an analysis can specify a set of physical 

targets for environmental assets and determine the regional 

allocation of land-use restrictions so that environmental 

assets are protected at the lowest national coal delivery 

costs. Appendix A demonstrates such an approach using 

DCAM. The approach's objective would be to achieve a 

targeted level of environmental preservation by selecting a 

set of areas and appropriate levels of restriction by area that 

add minimally to national coal delivery costs (compared to 

a case with no restrictions) while meeting national coal 

18 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
demands. The approach is based on setting regional or 

national targets, as agreed on in a political process, for 

environmental preservation. Once the targets are established, a cost-effective allocation of land-use restrictions 

can be estimated. 

CONCLUSIONS 

The opportunity costs of a long-term land-use policy 

decision have been estimated using DCAM, a dynamic 

linear program. The analysis illustrates how DCAM can 

establish a "first-cut" estimate of what it will cost the Nation 

to implement BLM land-use restrictions in selected Federal 

regions. The restrictions' incremental cost for 45 years is 

about $3 billion (in 1985 dollars) in present value terms or 

approximately 0.5 percent of the total market cost for the 

period. Lands restricted for environmental reasons (unsuitability criteria, 43 CPR 3461. 1) have about a $1 billion 

incremental cost in present value terms or approximately 

0.15 percent of the total market cost for the period. The 

incremental costs, in present value terms, of the unsuitability criteria land-use restrictions for 45 years could be as high 

as $4.7 billion in 2000 and $15.8 billion in 2020. The study 

also proposes a method to evaluate the cost effectiveness of 

extending or removing individual unsuitability criteria in 

specific locations. 

For the economic evaluation of long-term issues 

related to coal development to be helpful in public policy 

making, analyses should contain the following elements: 

• Coal supply. Bed-specific coal quality and quantity 

information is needed. Aggregating these types of data 

to any political boundary (for example, county or 

regional level) will aid the examination of the availability of specific coals for different uses. 

• Coal distribution. The analytical framework in which 

DCAM operates is designed to examine coal allocations 

and the impacts of resource depletion over time. DCAM 

combines two coal geographic information systems (the 

National Coal Resources Data System and the U.S. 

Department of Energy's Demonstrated Reserve Base) 

with economic information about producing, transporting, and using coal to determine an optimal allocation of 

resources for 45 years. Transactions in the coal market 

unfold over many years, so a study of market participants should represent the participants' behavior in 

accordance with real-world, dynamic market processes. 

• Coal utilization. Forecasts of coal consumption by 

location and type of use will influence when specific 

coals are extracted. This analysis projected sub-State 

coal demands based on mid-level National Energy Plan 

and Argonne National Lab projections, including a 

forecast for synthetic fuel demand. Alternative demand 

levels and coal utilization mixes could affect the market 

in different parts of the country differently. 

Although this effort concentrated on a detailei level 

of the coal market, transactions take place among market 

participants as individual purchases or contracts for a 

particular coal. Interactions among individual market participants are beyond DCAM' s detail. Refining ~ata to 

simulate actual market activities over time was n')t this 

study's purpose. Instead, the interest of this analy,:,is has 

been to simulate the U.S. coal market's dynamic behavior 

and to examine how specific policies and the consequent 

regional shifts in coal production over time affect the 

Nation. In this regard, DCAM's detail and structure are 

useful for policy evaluation. 

REFERENCES 

Brookshire, David S., Eubanks, Larry S., and Randall, Alan, 

1983, Estimating option prices and existence values for 

wildlife resources: Land Economics, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-15. 

ICF, Inc., 1980, Coal and electric utilities model docume:1tation: 

Washington, D.C., ICF, Inc., 271 p. 

Nelson, Robert H., 1983, The making of Federal coal policy: 

Durham, N.C., Duke University Press, 261 p. 

Office of the Federal Register, 1986, Public lands: interior, 43 

CFR 1000-3999: Washington, D.C., U.S. Govrrnment 

Printing Office (revised October 1), 904 p. 

Porter, Richard C., 1982, The new approach to wilierness 

preservation through benefit-cost analysis: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 9, no. 1, 

p. 59-80. . 

---1984, The optimal timing of an exhaustible, reversible 

wilderness development project: Land Economics, v. 60, no. 

3, p. 247-254. 

Trent, Virgil A., 1986, Estimated resources of non-leased Federal 

coal, Powder River basin, Montana and Wyoming: Reston, 

Va., U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Field Study 

1887, 21 p. 

U.S. Department of Energy, 1982a, Energy Information Administration, Eastern coal reserves: Washington, D.C., U.S. 

Government Printing Office, 371 p. 

---1982b, Energy Information Administration, Westc::rn coal 

reserves, part 1: Washington, D.C., U.S. Governmert Printing Office, 347 p. 

---1982c, Energy Information Administration, Western coal 

reserves, part 2: Washington, D.C., U.S. Governmert Printing Office, 347 p. 

---1984, Energy Information Administration, Natioral coal 

model (version 5): Washington, D.C., U.S. Govt'rnment 

Printing Office, 90 p. 

---1986, Energy Information Administration, Coal production 1985: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing 

Office, table A3, p. 97. 

---1988, Energy Information Administration, Coal distribution January-September 1987: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 97 p. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, 1984a, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo Resource Management Plan: Casper, Wyo., 

Bureau of Land Management, v. I, 343 p. 

Reference:: 19 
---l984b, Bureau of Land Management, Powder River 

resource area Resource Management Plan: Billings, Mont., 

Bureau of Land Management, 387 p. 

---1986, Bureau of Land Management, North Dakota draft 

Resource Management Plan and environmental impact statement: Dickinson, N.D., Bureau of Land Management, 173 p. 

---1987, Minerals Management Service, Mineral reserves: 

the report on receipts from Federal and Indian leases: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 101 p. 

Walsh, Richard G., Loomis, John B., and Gillman, RichardS., 

1984, Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for 

wilderness: Land Economics, v. 60, no. 1, p. 14-29. 

20 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
APPENDIXES 
INTRODUCTION TO APPENDIXES 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) is the 

principal computerized model used in this analysis. DCAM 

projects, over a specified planning horizon, regional coal 

production, coal prices, coal costs, coal rents, and pollution 

residuals based on exogenously specified sets of coal 

demand, environmental policy, and resource policy 

assumptions. Structurally, the system consists of a number 

of special-purpose modules linked to an intertemporal, 

interregional model of the U.S. coal market. Earlier models 

developed by the U.S. Department of Energy ( 1984), ICF, 

Inc. (1980), Modiano and Shapiro (1980), Bohi and Toman 

(1984), and Bemknopf (1985) have focused on coal markets' intertemporal or interregional nature but no attention 

was given directly to the simultaneous time and space 

relationships for a depletable, increasing-cost resource. 

Figure IN1 presents an overview of DCAM. Each 

module in figure IN1 is an integral piece of DCAM. The 

modules in the upper half of the diagram represent the 

procedures used to determine coal supply: 

• Minable Coal Resource Base- Estimate~ the minable 

tonnage of underground and surface coal by sulfur and 

Btu content for each DCAM coal supply region. 

• BLM Land-Use Restrictions-Determine:s which geographic areas are accessible for coal mining after the 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has applied its 

land-use planning screens. Defines altem1tive land-use 

restriction cases for DCAM to analyze. 

• Coal Mining Costs-Estimates free on beard (fob) coal 

mining costs as a function of coal geo10gy, type of 

mining, mine size, regional factor input prices, and 

regional taxes. Builds step functions for each coal 

supply region showing amount of fob coal tonnage 

available at incremental steps in mining cost ( 1985 

dollars per ton); also provides Btu content and final 

sulfur level for each tonnage-cost category. 

• Coal SOx Removal and Scrubbing Costs-Determines 

SOx scrubbing costs based on sulfur content and scrubber SOx removal efficiency. 

• Coal Transportation Costs-Determines costs for rail 

and barge transportation and electric transmission. Rail 

Mineable 

Coal 

Resource 

Base 

- BLM LandUse 

Restrictions 

-.. 

Coal 

Mining 

Costs 

Coal 

Demand 

SOX Discharge 

Limits 

Coal SOX 

Removal and 

Scrubbing 

Costs 

Figure IN1. Dynamic Coal Allocation Model. 

Coal 

Transportation 

Costs 

-.. 

1--E----

\II 

Market Simulation Model: 

Demand Met 

Supply Not Exceeded 

SOX Constraints Met 

Delivered Costs Minimized 

22 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

\II 

Coal Supply: --- Coal Unit Cost -=;:--

and 

Constraint -

-- Coefficients 
costs depend on mode (unit train or mixed freight), 

tonnage, and miles, plus other factors. Barge costs 

depend on loading and unloading costs, tonnage, transit 

delays, and distance. Electric transmission costs are 

determined using mileage and engineering relationships. 

• Coal Supply-Provides the array of coefficients 

to represent coal supply possibilities, including coefficients for mining costs, transport rates, and SOx 

scrubbing costs, as well as coefficients for constraints 

related to coal supply, SOx discharges, and transport 

capacities. 

Modules determining coal demand and demand-side 

SOx discharge limits are represented in the lower left side of 

figure IN1: 

• SOx Discharge Limits-Estimates demand-side limits 

on SOx discharges. This analysis used limits established 

by the Federal Clean Air Act for SOx and includes State 

Implementation Plans (SIP) limits, Federal new source 

performance standards (NSPS), and Federal revised 

new source performance standards (RNSPS). 

• Coal Demand-Determines regional coal demands. 

Coal demand projections are taken from recent U.S. 

Department of Energy projections, except for demands 

in existing coal utility boilers subject to SIP SOx 

standards and synfuel plant demands. The SIP demands 

are developed using coal utilization in 1985 and projections of SIP boiler capacities. Projections of synfuel 

plant demands for coal are based on data and projections 

from recent studies. 

The respective supply and demand modules (shown 

in the lower right side of fig. IN 1) provide all the data 

DCAM's Market Simulation Model (MSM) needs. The 

MSM simulates a market balance by determining the set of 

coal shipments, from supply regions to demand regions 

over 45 years, which minimize the sum of coal mining, 

transportation, and scrubbing costs (in present value terms) 

while meeting coal demand targets and staying within 

available supplies of coal, environmental quality limits, and 

transportation capacities. 

The appendixes describe the major function: each 

DCAM module performed. Detailed descriptions arr. given 

for the Market Simulation Model (A), Minabk Coal 

Resource Base Module (B), BLM Land-Use Restrictions 

(C), Coal Mining Costs Module (D), Coal SOx R~moval 

and Scrubbing Costs Module (E), Coal Transportation 

Costs Module (F), Coal Supply Module (G), SOx Discharge 

Limits Module (H), and Coal Demand Module (I). 

The appendixes discuss the major data sets the MSM 

used and present them in a series of tables. Because many 

of the data tables are long, they have been placec separately, following Appendix I. Figures are integratei with 

the appendix text. 

This study's data sets and computer programs are 

available on computer tape. This package of materials 

includes guidelines on programming procedures and on the 

linkages among programming inputs and outputs. It also 

contains the set of running instructions Uob control language) required to prepare all the data inputs and to execute 

the MSM. These materials are available from th~ U.S. 

Geological Survey. 

References 

Bernknopf, Richard L., 1985, Domestic coal distribution: an interregional programming model for the U.S. 

coal industry: Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, 230 p. 

Bohi, Douglas R., and Toman, Michael A., 1984, 

Analyzing nonrenewable resource supply: Washington, 

D.C., Resources for the Future, Inc., 159 p. 

ICF, Inc., 1980, Coal and electric utilities model 

documentation: Washington, D.C., ICF, Inc., 271 p. 

Modiano, Eduardo M., and Shapiro, Jeremy F., 

1980, A dynamic optimization model of depletable resources: The Bell Journal of Economics, v. 11, no. 1, p. 

212-236. 

U.S. Department of Energy, 1984, Energy Information Administration, National coal model (version 5): 

Washington, D.C. , U.S. Government Printing Office, 90 p. 

Introduction to Appendixef 23 
APPENDIX A-MARKET SIMULATION MODEL 

The Market Simulation Model (MSM) is the 

Dynamic Coal Allocation Model's (DCAM) most important 

analytic component. The MSM integrates supply schedules, 

demands, transportation capacity constraints, and sulfur 

dioxide (SOx) discharge limits to determine regional coal 

production patterns that minimize the present value of 

extraction, transportation, and SOx removal costs while 

meeting projected national coal demands and operating 

within allowable sulfur emission standards, available supplies of minable coal, and shipping capacities (locks and 

transmission lines). 

The MSM is a piecewise dynamic linear programming model that simulates market behavior over time for an 

exhaustible resource with increasing costs. In applying the 

model to the national coal market, coal resource rents in the 

form of locational, quality, and scarcity rents are determined endogenously. These rents provide the necessary 

market signals for efficient intertemporal and interregional 

allocation of the Nation's coal. In addition to regional coal 

output and rents, the MSM projects regional coal prices, 

costs, and depletion and SOx discharges. 

The MSM analyzes coal allocation as a dynamic 

market clearing process. Economic rents associated with the 

depletion of heterogeneous coals are the market values that 

link the coal allocation patterns across time. Delivered price 

for any particular coal is equal to full marginal cost at the 

destination market, which includes conventional marginal 

costs (for extracting, transporting, and scrubbing coal) plus 

certain static and dynamic marginal opportunity costs 

(MOC's). Static MOC's are society's costs to use the 

limited capacity of the Earth's atmosphere to ass.imilate coal 

emissions (SOx discharge limits) and limited transportation 

capacity for river locks and transmission lines. Dynamic 

MOC's are the discounted values of society's future 

increased costs (coal extraction, transportation, and scrubbing) that result when a particular cost coal is extracted in 

the current time period and is unavailable to the market 

later. Because the prices the MSM calculates include all 

current and future opportunity costs and because the coal 

delivered (in the solution) has the lowest marginal opportunity costs, the MSM's coal allocation is at a minimum 

cost in present value terms. 

Over the time period of this analysis, the coal is not 

depleted physically. 1 Because depletion does not occur, the 

MSM does not make the transition to a backstop 

technology. 2 In simple models of exhaustible resource 

1

The deliverable coal resource base for the United States is estimated 

to be 346 billion tons (see table D2) whereas cumulative coal demands in 

1985 to 2065 are estimated to be 156 billion tons. 2 A backstop technology is an alternative form of energy supply that 

could provide large quantities of energy at a price above current prices, for 

example. fusion reactors for generating electric energy (Nordhaus. 1979). 

markets, it is often assumed that extrac+ion costs are 

constant and physical exhaustion occurs. In models of this 

kind, dynamic linkage is achieved by a scarcity rent for a 

homogeneous commodity rising at the rate of interest (the "r 

percent rule" first presented by Hotelling ( 1931)). The 

conditions of that simple case do not fit the MSM. Instead, 

MSM contains a highly heterogeneous array of coal supply 

possibilities distinguished by different locations, mining 

costs, SOx scrubbing costs, transportation costs, tonnage, 

and Btu and sulfur contents. The rents tha+ occur in this 

situation are dynamic Ricardian rents. 3 They are the present 

value of future additional costs due to current extraction. 

The transition in the MSM. over time, is to higher costing 

coal resources, not to physical exhaustion o .. to a backstop 

technology. 

In the MSM, different dynamic Ricarcian rents occur 

for every potential shipment possibility. These rents are part 

of the marginal opportunity cost the MSM Ufes to set prices 

and, hence, to determine an efficient coal allocation. After 

the mathematical formulations are presen+~d below, an 

example from the base case solution (which has no restrictions on coal access) will illustrate these relationships. 

The MSM is presented first in terms of the complete 

set of subscripts necessary for all suppl~r and demand 

details. Following this, a streamlined version of the model 

(supply and demand subscripts are deleted) is given. The 

streamlined model retains all of the genera 1 formulation's 

key economic properties while allowing for easier exposition of the role of rents and price conditionf in the optimal 

solution. 

A General Mathematical Model 

Table A 1 presents a general mathematical formulation of the MSM. Table A2 contains the legend for 

interpreting the model's indices and equatiC'ns. 

The MSM allocates U.S. coal ovrr 45 years to 

minimize total mining, transportation, and scrubbing costs 

(in present value terms) while meeting projected coal 

demands and operating within allowable SOx emission 

standards, available supplies of minable coal, and shipping 

capacities for river locks and transmission lines. The MSM 

assumes technological change in coal production by incorporating productivity improvements at a level that keeps 

aggregate national average mining costs constant (consistent with recent historic performance). The model. though, 

assumes no technological change in distril''lting or using 

3

The role of dynamic Ricardian rents in exhaustible resources 

models is discussed in Toman (1986) and Hartwick (l9~?.). The concept of 

rent as an extra payment to a specialized or unique ecc:momic input (such 

as rent earned by low-sulfur coal) is attributed to the 18th-century 

economist, David Ricardo. 

24 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
coal. However, in the out years, the model does include 

synthetic fuel production from coaL The MSM has these 

main structural features: 

• 60 coal supply regions, each represented by a step 

function of up to 12 steps relating minable tonnage to 

mining cost by sulfur and Btu content, 

• 243 coal consuming markets that represent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional air sheds 

(AQCR 's-air quality control regions), each having one 

or more of 8 possible types of coal demand, including 

electric utility and industrial boiler demands, export 

demands, metallurgic demands, and synfuel demands, 

• 5 modes of coal transportation: mixed freight rail or unit 

train, waterway, intermodal transshipments between 

water and rail, or electric transmission lines (mine 

mouth power plants generate electricity that is shipped 

as tonnage equivalents over high-voltage transmission 

lines), and 

• 6 planning periods spanning 45 years. 

The model runs for the base case and a restricted case 

(which has restricted access to Western Federal coal-see 

Appendix C), starts in 1985, and covers six time periods: 

1986-1990, 1991-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2010, 

2011-2020, and 2021-2030. The first three periods are 

5-year increments while the last three are 10-year increments. Consequently, constraint limits with time subscripts, 

such as demands, SOx limits, and transmission and lock 

capacities, are total quantities for each period. That is, 

SDijt• Djkto ~Djkto Lw, and Eit are cumulative 5-year totals 

for the first three time periods and cumulative 10-year totals 

for the last three time periods. Likewise, the optimal 

shipment tonnages (xmijklt and Ymijlt) are cumulative quantities by period. For reporting purposes, however, outputs 

and inputs are presented as average-per-year quantities at 

the midpoints of the time intervals ( 1988, 1993, 1998, 

2005, 20 15, and 2025). The midpoints are used also for 

calculating discounted costs. 

Federal and State regulations, which govern sulfur 

dioxide discharges to the atmosphere, are important determinants of coal allocation. The MSM models these regulations directly. For example, MSM coal demand regions are 

the AQCR's established by the EPA. This allows SOx 

regulations, which are to be met in AQCR's, to be tied 

directly to appropriate classes of coal utilization. Coal 

utilization, by SOx regulation, falls into three categories: (1) 

coal utilization under State Implementation Plans (SIP's), 

(2) coal utilization under Federal new source performance 

standards (NSPS), and (3) coal utilization under Federal 

revised new source performance standards (RNSPS). The 

MSM has certain requirements for each category. SIP coals 

must have sulfur contents within allowable State standards. 

SOx discharges from NSPS coal cannot be larger than the 

Federal discharge limit. RNSPS coal must be scrubbed 

according to Federal regulations. These MSM requirements 

are included in the mathematical model presented in this 

appendix. Additional details on implementing th~ SOx 

regulations in the MSM and in DCAM are presented in 

appendix H, SOx Discharge Limits module, and in Appendix I, Coal Demand module. 

In the MSM, any supply region (xsijklt) can or:ginate 

coal shipments to meet NSPS, RNSPS, metallurgic, export, 

and synfuel coal demands, as long as constraints are not 

violated. In contrast, shipments to meet SIP demand5' (y sijlt) 

have fixed supply origins and demand destinatiors (see 

Appendix H). In the SIP case, the model chooses different 

coal supply steps (for the fixed origin) and different 

transport modes (for the fixed origin and destination) to 

minimize costs. 

The following summaries of MSM' s objective function and constraints on the solution are keyed (by heading) 

to the MSM's mathematical representation in table Al. 4 

Objective Function 

The MSM selects ( 1) tonnages (xsijklt) that minimize 

the discounted sum of mining, transportation, and scrubbing costs for shipments to meet NSPS, RNSPS, export, 

metallurgic, and synfuel demands and (2) tonnages (Ysijlt) 

that minimize the discounted sum of mining and transportation costs for shipments to meet SIP demands. 

Constraints 

SIP Demand: The total tons shipped from fixed 

supply origins, added across coal supply steps and transport 

modes, must equal SIP demands at fixed demand d:-stinations. 

Other Demand: Shipments in tons of coal containing 

24 million Btu per ton must be greater than or ecnal to 

demand. 

SOx Discharge NSPS Demands: Tons of sulfnr discharged when NSPS shipments are combusted cannot 

exceed tons allowed under NSPS regulations at the d'~mand 

center. 

SIP Limits: SIP coal must have a sulfur content (in 

terms of pounds of SOx per million Btu) that is not greater 

than the SIP limit. 

Supply: Supply constraints allow for the normal 

development of a coal field over a 15- to 20-year period. 

They recognize that coal is usually blocked-up and mined 

out in a steady progression over 20 years. The supply 

constraints are set up in the following manner: The sum of 

all shipments in the first 5 years from a coal supply step in 

region i cannot exceed one-third of the available deliverable 

tonnage at that step; the sum of all shipments in the first 10 

years cannot exceed two-thirds of the available deliverable 

4

Subsequent appendices present the data sets and additiona1 details 

on the procedures used to estimate the data inputs the MSM needs. 

Appendix A-Market Simulation Model 25 
tonnage. After 15 years, the sum of all shipments cannot 

exceed total deliverable supply at a specific coal supply 

step. 

River Locks: The sum of coal shipped on barges in 

any given time period cannot exceed river lock capacities. 

Electric Transmission: Electric transmission shipments are limited to transmission line capacity. 

Unit Trains: Unit train shipments must equal or 

exceed 500,000 tons per year. 

Coal Quality, Export, and Metallurgic Shipments: 

Coal shipped to export and metallurgic markets must meet 

quality constraints for sulfur and Btu contents. 

Non-Negative Shipments: Negative shipments of coal 

are not allowed. 

To solve the MSM, the number of coal supply 

possibilities available as candidates for entry into the 

solution procedures must be reduced. Six variable 

indexes-s, i, j. k, 1, and t-and upper limits on these 

indexes-S, I, J, K, L, and T -determine the total number 

of coal shipment candidates (see tables A1 and A2). With 

no special limits imposed, approximately 10 million coal 

shipments are available to enter the dynamic linear programming calculations. If all of these shipment possibilities 

were implemented, the MSM would be insoluble. To have 

a reasonable MSM matrix size, the following adjustments 

were made: 

1. The number of coal supply steps (as indexed by s), 

which account for coal supply tonnage available at 

different mining costs and sulfur contents by supply 

region, was reduced from an average of 30 steps to an 

average of 8 steps per supply region (see Appendix B 

for details). 

2. More than 27,000 coal transportation rates from supply 

regions to demand destinations were reduced to 

approximately 5,300 (see Appendix F for details). 

After these adjustments were made, the MSM had 

about 450,000 coal shipment candidates to consider. 

The MSM had more than 6,000 inequalities or 

constraints to meet in the solution. An IBM software 

package, the Mathematical Programming System Extended 

(IBM Inc. , 1978 and 1979), was used to solve the MSM. As 

explained above, about 450,000 coal supply candidate 

activities were available. 

A Streamlined Model 

The study used a streamlined MSM to develop the 

model optimality conditions and to explore the role of future 

opportunity costs in the optimal solution. Optimality conditions are derived using the Kuhn-Tucker mathematical 

theorems for optimization (see Chiang, 1984, p. 722-753). 

To apply Kuhn-Tucker conditions, twice differentiable 

functions are assumed for extraction, transportation, and 

scrubbing costs. All subscripts except t are suppressed to 

keep derivations simple. 

Extraction, transportation, and scrub1ing costs are 

positive functions of current and cumulative extraction. In 

an historic context, coal extraction from a nonrenewable 

base has progressed from the lowest costing resources to 

higher costing resources. Consequently, current mining 

costs are higher due to the past cumulative reduction in the 

coal resource base. Likewise, because low-sulfur coal has 

already been extracted, the current cost of meeting SOx 

discharge limits can be higher. History also affects transportation costs; fewer supply location alt~matives raise 

transportation costs when coal is obtain~d from more 

remote supply regions. 

Extraction costs can increase as a region's production 

increases because, at some level of production, coal can be 

obtained only from resources available at a higher mining 

cost. As lock and transmission line capacifes are reached 

when regional production increases, transnortation rates 

from a specific supply region increase. Similarly, increased 

levels of regional coal production can require extracting 

higher sulfur coal, resulting in higher SOx s~rubbing costs. 

In mathematical terms, mining, transportation, and 

SOx scrubbing costs are a function of the current level of 

coal production (X1) and the cumulative amount of past coal 

production (Z1

), or 

Regional mining costs=et(x1

, z1

), 

Regional transportation costs=n1(xr, Zr), and 

Regional SOx scrubbing costs=b/t'1, Z1

) 

t-1 

where z,= ~xq q=l 

As the discussion above indicates, the first-order 

partial derivatives of each of the cost functions with respect 

to X1 and Zt are positive: ae;axt > 0, ae;azt > 0, an;axt > 

0, an;azr > o, ab;axr > 0, and ab;azr > o. 

The following objective function (eq. Al) and constraint inequalities (expressions A2 througt AS) represent 

the streamlined programming model: 

min K= ±c ~,)'- [e,(x,, z,)+n,(x,, z,)+b,(x,, z,)] (AI) 

xt t=I 

subject to CXX1 2:: D 1 

where 

~xr ::; 0.0072D1 

xrsL 

xt:s;Er 

x1 2::0 

(Pr) 

(Br) 

(Cr) 

(Mr) 

(A2) 

(A3) 

(A4) 

(A5) 

K=total cost (in present value terms) of extracting, 

transporting, and scrubbing coal over the planning 

horizon 

r =rate of discount 

T=final year in the planning horizon 

e1 =cost of extraction in time t ($/ton) 

26 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
xt =tons of coal extracted in a time period t 

Zr =cumulative extraction up to t 

nt =cost of transportation in time t ($/ton) 

bt =cost of scrubbing coal at a market in time t ($/ton) 

a =factor for converting coal in actual tons to coal 

in normal tons, in terms of Btu ((Btu/ton)/ 

24,000,000) 

Dr =coal demand at each destination in normal tons 

(tons containing 24,000,000 Btu/ton) 

~=fraction of sulfur content in the coal by weight at 

the coal origin ad jus ted for sulfur removal by 

scrubbing 

0.0072=EPA regulation (NSPS) for sulfur discharges at a 

consumption market (tons of sulfur per normal ton 

of coal) 

L =capacity in tons at a waterway lock 

Et =electric transmission line capacity (tons of coal 

equivalent). 

The constraints (inequalities A2-A5) and their dual 

variables or shadow values (symbols in parentheses on the 

right side of the inequalities) have the following interpretations: 

• Inequality A2. Coal shipments (transformed into Btu 

units by a) must be large enough to satisfy demand (in 

Btu units = Dt). Pr is the delivered price for a marginal 

ton of coal (dollars/ton at 24 million Btu per ton, in 

present value terms). If demand were relaxed 

(increased) by 1 ton (or 24 million Btu), Pt is the 

amount by which the objective function would decrease 

(increase). In other words, Pt is the market clearing 

price for a delivered ton of coal containing 24 million 

Btu per ton. 

• Inequality A3. Tons of sulfur discharged cannot exceed 

SOx limits in the demand region. The factor ~ converts 

coal to tons of sulfur; it equals the sulfur fraction (by 

weight) of coal adjusted by sulfur scrubbing removal 

percentage. The factor 0.0072 converts demand (in Btu 

terms) into tons of sulfur allowed under a Federal new 

source performance standard of 1.2 lb of SOx per 

million Btu. Bt is the shadow value on sulfur discharges 

to the atmosphere (dollars/ton of sulfur, in present value 

terms). If the constraint on sulfur discharges were 

relaxed by 1 ton of sulfur, Bt is the amount of change in 

the objective function. Bt is like a market clearing price 

on sulfur discharges. If the atmosphere were owned and 

managed for waste disposal, B t is the amount that could 

be charged for each ton of sulfur dumped. Since the 

atmosphere is not managed as a waste assimilating 

asset, Bt is a rent that can accrue to any market 

participant. Nonetheless, Bt is a marginal opportunity 

cost of limiting sulfur discharges to legal levels. 

• Inequality A4. Tons of coal shipped cannot exceed river 

lock capacities L. ct is the shadow value on limited lock 

capacity (dollars/ton of coal, in present value terms). If 

the lock capacity were to be increased by 1 ton of coal, 

then Ct is the amount by which the objective function 

would decrease. Ct is the amount a lock O'"ner can 

charge on each ton of coal passing through a capacityconstrained lock. Since Ct reflects the cost of the next 

best alternative, it, like Bt, is a marginal op':lortunity 

cost. 

• Inequality AS. Tons of coal shipped cannot exceed 

electric transmission capacities Er Mt is the shadow 

value on limited transmission capacity (dollars/ton of 

coal, in present value terms). It is the marginal opportunity cost of transmitting coal through a capacityconstrained transmission line. 

To develop necessary conditions for an optimal solution, the constraint inequalities are multiplied by their 

associated dual variables and added to (or, as apr'"opriate, 

subtracted from) the objective function to obtain th~ following Lagrangian expression: 

T 

min Z=K+ t~J -Pr (axr-Dr)+Br (~xt-0.0072Dr) 

+Cr (xr-L)+Mr(xr-Er)J (A6) 

with respect to 

XI, .•• ,Xt, •.• ,XT 

PI····•pt•····PT 

BI····•Bt•····BT 

Cl, ... ,Ct, ... ,Cr 

MI•···•Mt•····MT 

Applying the Kuhn-Tucker theorem to A6 gives the necessary conditions for a minimum cost solution. The first step 

is to take partial derivatives with respect to eac"' x. The 

expression that results involves a trailing sum w'lich is a 

dynamic Ricardian rent. The steps leading to this result can 

be seen by expanding K ( eq. A 1) for time periods 1 through 

3, taking the partial derivative with respect to .:r1 in this 

expression and in the remaining terms in Z, then w;ting the 

corresponding general result. 

The three-period expansion of K is 

K=e 1(x1)+ni(x1)+bi(x1)+(1/1 +r) (A7) 

·[e2 (x2 ; xi)+n2 (x2 ; x 1)+b2 (x2 ; x 1)] 

+(1/1 +r)2·[e3 (x3 ; x 1 +x2 )+n3(x3 ; xi +x2)+b3(x3 ; xi +x2 )] 

where 

z2 =x1 and 

z3=xi+x2. 

Substituting A 7 into A6 and taking the partial cerivative 

with respect to xi gives: 

(A8) 

Upon collection of terms in A8 

Appendix A-Market Simulation Mo.-el 27 
az 

-a =-cx.P1+~B1+C1+M1 x1 (A9) 

The last term in expression A9 is the present value of future 

marginal extraction, transportation, and scrubbing costs that 

result from current extraction. It is the dynamic Ricardian 

rent associated with current extraction. This rent is a 

discounted value over all future time periods of higher 

future costs (mining, scrubbing, and transporting), resulting 

from a current decision to extract an additional ton of coal. 

The effect depletes economic, not physical, resources. 

Current extraction raises future costs, but future extraction 

remains a possibility. 

The general necessary condition for an optimal or 

cost-minimizing solution, obtained as an extension of A9, is 

az 

-a =-cx.Pr+~B +C +M1 Xr 

(AlO) 

For the solution to be optimal, it is also necessary that 

Kuhn-Tucker complementary slackness conditions be satisfied, as follows: 

xr(aZ/ax1)=0 

If x1>0 then, by complementary slackness, 

or from AlO azlax1=0 

P (1 )

t-1_ aet ant abt 

ex t +r -a +a +a X1 X1 x, (A1la) 

(All b) 

The right side of expression Alla includes conventional 

marginal costs (the sum of marginal extraction, transportation, and scrubbing costs). Expression Allb is the sum of 

marginal opportunity costs associated with SOx discharge 

limits, river lock capacities, and transmission line capacities. Expression Allc is the future marginal opportunity 

cost from current extraction of nonrenewable coal. The term 

(1 +r)'- 1 in Alla and Allb moves the presf'nt price and 

shadow values forward from their discounted values in the 

initial period (time= 1) to undiscounted values in the current 

period (time=t). The term ex., dividing through on left and 

right sides, converts dollars per ton (by weight) for the right 

side values into dollars per ton of coal containing 24 million 

Btu per ton. The term Pr(l +r)1

- 1 is mar1

\et price in 

undiscounted dollars per ton of coal containing 24 million 

Btu per ton. Thus, equation All says that a shipment can be 

in the optimal solution if its full marginal costs (normalized 

for Btu) are equal to (or are just covered by) the delivered 

price consumers are willing to pay at the demand center. 

That price equals the shadow value on the demand constraint. 

When delivered price does not cover full marginal 

cost (for all parts of the market transaction), the shipment 

will not be made since suppliers cannot cover all their costs. 

This logical outcome also is consistent witl' the KuhnTucker complementary slackness condition. If x,=O then, 

by complementary slackness, aztax;2:.0 or from AlO, full 

marginal cost2:.price. 

The Kuhn-Tucker conditions also provide insight on 

cost competition among different supply regiors potentially 

shipping to a given demand center. Full mr-rginal costs 

(FMC in dollars per ton of coal containing 24 million Btu 

per ton) from two sources (i = g and i = h) that could 

supply coal to demand region j, are shown as follows: 

and 

FMCgj = marginal extraction cost8 

+ marginal transportation costgj 

+ marginal scrubbing cost8 

+ shadow value on SOx dischargegj 

+ shadow value on lock capacit~r gj 

+ shadow value on electric tram-mission8 

+ dynamic Ricardian rent8 

FMChj = marginal extraction costh 

+ marginal transportation costhJ 

+ marginal scrubbing costh 

+ shadow value on SOx discharrehJ 

+ shadow value on lock capacit~· hJ 

+ shadow value on electric trans-missionh 

+ dynamic Ricardian renth 

By the Kuhn-Tucker conditions, both coal supr1y regions g 

and h would supply demand region j if the price from each 

supply region covers full marginal delivered costs: 

Price1 = FMC &i = FMChJ· 

Figure Al illustrates this fundamental principle of 

nonrenewable resource supply by an example drawn from 

the base case. The demand region is Evansville, Ind., 

AQCR 77. Delivered price for NSPS coal (shad'Jw value on 

the demand constraint) is $60.77 per ton in 19~5, rising to 

$69.75 per ton by 2000. Six regions supply coal to this 

market between 1985 and 2000. Every year, two regions 

supply coal: Powder River, Mont. (region 95), step 1; and 

28 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
$/ton of 

coal containing 

24 million 

btu/ton 

Time Period 1 

1986-1990 

I 

FMC 

P1 

I 

I I 

Time Period 2 

1991-1995 

Time Period 3 

1996-2000 

FMC 

P7 

I 

I 

I 

69.75 

FMC 

MOR1 & MR3 --------,-- 1 I 

Market 

Price 

FMC 

P7 

60.77 

FMC 

PRM1 & H1 

Extraction 

+ 

Transportation 

57 

51 

45 

Morganfield, KV, Supply Region 33, Step 1 (MOR1) 

Moffat Routt, CO, Supply Region 93, Step 3 (MR3) 

Powder River, MT, Supply Region 95, Step 1 (PRM1) 

+ 

Scrubbing 

Cost 

38 

32 

Pikeville, KV, Supply Region 9, Step 7 (P7) 

____ {Pikeville, KV, Supply Region 9, Step 1 (P1) 

Harrisburg, IL, Supply Region 31, Step 1 (H1) 

I 

Cumulative Tons 

Figure A1. Optimal deliveries of coal to NSPS boilers, Evansville, Indiana, AQCR 77. 

Harrisburg, Ill. (region 31), step 1. The price just covers 

FMC for these two regions. Mining, transporting, and 

scrubbing costs are $45 and $32 per ton in the respective 

regions. Neither of the coals is scrubbed. Consequently, the 

SOx constraint requires relatively large payments for emissions into the air around Evansville. 

Adding SOx discharge shadow values, a river lock 

shadow value for the Powder River shipment, and dynamic 

Ricardian rents brings full marginal cost to equal a market 

price of $60.77 per ton in 1985. As time proceeds, static 

and dynamic rents for the two supply regions change so that 

equality is maintained between price and FMC and the two 

regions continue to supply Evansville. 

Figure A1 also shows the FMC for coal potentially 

supplied from four other coal supply regions: Pikeville, Ky. 

(region 9), step 1; Pikeville, Ky. (region 9), step 7; 

Morganfield, Ky. (region 33), step 1; and Moffat & Routt 

Counties, Colo. (region 93), step 3. Pikeville (step 1) is cost 

competitive in the first time period, as shown by the 

coincidence of its FMC with delivered price; it enters the 

optimal solution. However, by time period 2, FMC for 

Pikeville (step 1) exceeds market price, and coal from this 

source is no longer shipped to Evansville. In time period 2, 

another region, Pikeville (step 7), becomes a su.,plier to 

Evansville as the Pikeville FMC comes into line with the 

Evansville market price. In time period 3, Pikeville (step 7) 

is no longer a supplier, but two other regions, Mo"'ganfield 

(step 1) and Moffat & Routt (step 3), become surnliers. 

Complementary slackness from the Kuhn-Tu~ker theorem also requires that the optimal solution satisf:" 

PrcazlaPt) =O 

BlaZ/aBt) =0 

creaz/act) =o 

MreazlaMr)=O 

If a constraint is binding (such as, (3xr=0.0072Dt), complementary slackness dictates that the correspond :ng dual 

variable, which acts as a shadow value or marvet price 

(such as Br), be greater than or equal to zero. When 

non-zero, the dual variable will be set equal to the activity's 

MOC that just brings the constraint to equality. 

The economic properties of the optimal MSM solution are summarized as follows: 

• Static rents (associated with SOx discharge limits, lock 

capacities, and transmission line capacif~s) and 

Appendix A-Market Simulation Mc~el 29 
dynamic Ricardian rents measure the MOC's that occur 

when a total cost-minimizing allocation of coal production, shipment, and scrubbing is achieved. 

• Full marginal costs in the optimal solution equal marginal extraction, transportation, and scrubbing costs 

plus static rents and dynamic Ricardian rents. 

• Coal is not physically exhausted in the optimal solution; 

rather, coal is used in order of increasing FMC. Full 

marginal cost includes dynamic Ricardian rents, which 

are the present value of future costs incurred as a result 

of current extraction. These dynamic Ricardian rents 

provide an economic linkage across time. 

• The MSM calculates demand shadow values as a 

measure of the opportunity cost of meeting an additional 

ton of demand. 

• The MSM calculates shadow values (marketlike prices) 

for all binding constraints in the optimal solution (SOx 

discharge limits, lock and transmission capacities). The 

shadow values are a measure of marginal opportunity 

cost. 

• A shipment from a supply region to a demand region 

can enter the optimal solution with a positive tonnage 

value only if that shipment's FMC equals the demand 

shadow value (price) at the demand region. 

• All coal received at a demand region from different 

supply regions must have the same delivered cost in 

dollars per unit of Btu. 

MSM Applications 

The MSM has many applications. Among them, this 

report uses two examples to illustrate the MSM' s utility in 

assessing long-term economic effects of public land-use 

planning. It is assumed that a given set of land-use 

restrictions on public coal lands would change the amount 

of coal resources available to meet demands. If the 

restricted coal resources are low cost, then the Nation's 

costs could increase when land-use restrictions are implemented. 

Currently, MSM can estimate the Nation's opportunity cost from the U.S. Department of the Interior's (USDI) 

land-use restrictions. This MSM application is a form of 

positive analysis. The question is, what are the costs of a 

given set of land-use restrictions? The MSM can analyze 

with-restriction and without-restriction cases to provide a 

reasonable answer. Appendix C describes this analysis, the 

report's main subject. 

An alternative MSM application concerns normative 

issues. The MSM can determine the allocation (by region 

and by amount) of land-use restrictions that minimize the 

costs of meeting some specified set of environmental 

protection targets. (The main report suggests this approach 

as a planning methodology for USDI to implement.) The 

remainder of this appendix details using the MSM to 

examine such cost-effective planning options. 

At the most general level, cost-effective options can 

be determined by adding appropriate constraints to the 

MSM. Two examples will distinguish between "renewable" 

and "nonrenewable" natural assets. 

Some wildlife, for example, sage gronse, 5 can be 

regarded as renewable. That is, when land is being surface 

mined, sage grouse habitat would be disrupted and the flow 

of environmental service values associated witl' sage grouse 

would decrease. Once mining ceases and reclamation is 

complete, the service flows could resume. Assume now that 

a target (GTt) has been determined for sage grouse. An 

appropriate constraint for the MSM would be 

where 

Go-f.L.Xt ~ GTr 

f.L.Xr :::s Go-GTr 

G0 = the current inventory of sage grouse habitat, 

(A12a) 

(Al2b) 

J.L = a locality-specific factor for transforming mined coal 

tonnage into units of disturbed sage grouse habitat, 

and 

GTr=the lower bound constraint on undi~turbed sage 

grouse habitat. 

Constraint A12b says that coal mining operations would be 

allowed in specific localities as long as no more than G0 -

GTt sage grouse habitats per year are disturbei. 

Other natural assets may be regarded as nonrenewable. For example, surface mining could permanently 

disturb the eagle habitat. The tradeoff here would be against 

a stock of eagle habitats, rather than against r flow of the 

service values of sage grouse. The constraint W'Juld take the 

following form: T 

E0 - ~ Sxt ~ ET (A13a) t=l 

or 

(A13b) 

where t=l 

E0 =the current inventory of eagle habitat, 

S =a locality-specific factor for converting mined coal 

tonnage into units of disturbed eagle habitat, and 

ET =the physical target set for undisturbed eagle habitat. 

Constraint Al3b says that coal mining operations 

over all years in the planning horizon cannot disturb more 

than E0 - ET units of eagle habitat. The dual variable for 

constraint Al3b would be a dynamic scarcity r"~nt; it would 

be the discounted marginal increase in future extraction, 

transportation, and scrubbing costs resulting from eagle 

habitat preservation. 6 

5

Determining whether a natural asset is renewable o~ nonrenewable 

would be based on assessments made by qualified scientists. 

6

Constraints for other natural assets could involve effects from coal 

mining that accumulate for more than a year but do not n,n to the end of 

the planning horizon. Still other natural assets may require 0-1 mixed 

integer constraints to reflect a none-or-all effect on environmental asset 

preservation from coal mining. In any case, appropriate co'lstraints can be 

added to the MSM to capture the essential features of natural asset 

preservation. 

30 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
(Billion 1985$) 

Present 

Discounted 

Value of 

National 

Coal Delivery 

Costs (NCDC) 

0 GT 

Number of preserved sage grouse habitats 

Figure A2. Cost-effective tradeoff between sage grouse 

habitat and national coal delivery costs. 

A schedule of cost-effective tradeoffs could be projected if the MSM is solved with constraints like A12b and 

A13b. Figure A2 presents a hypothetical example. For any 

sage grouse habitat targets less than GT0 , national coal 

delivery costs are unaffected because sage grouse habitats 

(in specific regions) are colocated with high-cost or lowquality coal (coal that is not attractive to the market). For 

preservation targets greater than GT0 , costs increase as the 

constraint binds. The largest cost occurs when the target is 

set at the existing inventory of sage grouse habitats G0 . 

With a target set at a specific level, such as GT in 

figure A2, the MSM would minimize costs of meeting that 

target, it would identify the areas where restrictions are 

required to preserve sage grouse habitat, and it would 

identify areas with sage grouse habitat where coal mining 

operations would be permitted. 

Figure A3 illustrates the cost-effective tradeoffs that 

occur when the MSM meets the environmental protection 

targets. The number of sage grouse habitats to be protected 

is GT. Minimum cost or cost-effective allocation by the 

MSM would occur when marginal protection costs are equal 

in all regions for the last or marginal habitat required to be 

protected to meet the target. As figure 3A shows, this 

allocation occurs when GT1 habitats are protected in region 

1 (which, in this example, equals the total number of sage 

grouse habitats in region 1) and when Gfl habitats are 

protected in region 2. All sage grouse habitats would be 

restricted for surface mining in region 1, but, in region 2, 

some of the sage grouse-inhabited area would be open to 

surface mining. The shaded areas of figure A3 represent the 

additional national coal delivery costs that would occur 

when coal land set asides protect sage grouse habitat (at 

level GT). The additional cost is the lowest cost at protection level GT because marginal costs are equal in the two 

regions in the MSM solution. No other allocation of 

protection between the two regions could reduce costs; for 

$per sage 

grouse habitat 

$ added to national coal 

delivery costs per 

protected sage grouse 

habitat 

·-+ 

0 GT~G6 

Number of sage grouse 

habitats in Region 2 

Number of sage grouse 

habitats in Region 1 

Figure A3. Cost-effective tradeoffs to achieve a given 

protection level for sage grouse habitat. 

example, increasing the number of protected sag~ grouse 

habitats in region 1 would add more to coal deliw~ry costs 

than would be saved by the off-setting reduction in protection in region 2. The addition to national coal deliv~ry costs 

(for protection level GT) shown as the shaded areas of 

figure A3 is the same dollar amount shown as ~rTCDC in 

figure A2. 

MSM Output Reports 

MSM output is collected for presentation in summary 

reports. The most detailed of these reports include(' projections on shipments from individual supply origins to individual demand destinations. Separate projections are provided for each index value: coal supply step (s), co1l supply 

origin (i), coal demand destination (j), coal dem~nd type 

(k), transport mode (l), and time period (t). 

For each shipment, the MSM reports value.s for the 

following variables: tons, delivered cost, mining cost, 

transport cost, scrubbing cost, Btu content, scrubbing SOx 

removal percentage, sulfur content, demand shadcw value, 

sulfur shadow value, lock shadow value, trar':'mission 

shadow value, and dynamic Ricardian rent. These reports 

provided the data for the Evansville, Ind., examp ~ shown 

in figure Al. The reports are available from the authors (at 

reproduction cost) for the base and restricted cases. 

Appendix A-Market Simulation M(]del 31 
References 

Chiang, Alpha C., 1984, Fundamental methods of mathematical 

economics: New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 788 p. 

Hartwick, John M., 1982, Differential resource rents and the two 

theories of nonrenewable resource valuation: Resources and 

Energy, v. 4, p. 281-289. 

Hotelling, H .. 1931, The economics of exhausti~le resources: 

Journal of Political Economy, v. 39, p. 137-175. 

Nordhaus, William D., 1979, The efficient use of energy resources: New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 161 p. 

Toman, Michael A., 1986, "Depletion effects" and nonrenewable 

resource supply: Land Economics, v. 62, no. 4, p. 341-352. 

32 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
APPENDIX B-MINABLE COAL RESOURCE 

BASE MODULE 

The Minable Coal Resource Base module contains 

the calculations necessary to estimate minable coal tonnage 

by sulfur and Btu content for 60 coal supply regions 

contained in the contiguous 48 States. Three steps are 

followed (see fig. Bl): 

1. Surface and underground coal tonnages are calculated 

using data from the U.S. Department of Energy's 

Demonstrated Reserve Base (DRB) files (U.S. Department of Energy 1982a, 1982b, 1982c, 1986a, and 

1986b), the U.S. Geological Survey's National Coal 

Resources Data System (NCRDS), the Keystone Coal 

Industry Manual (1986), and various U.S. Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM) reports. 

2. Triangular distributions of sulfur content (percent by 

weight) are estimated regionally using data from the 

U.S. Bureau of Mines' Analytic File, the U.S. GeoDept. of Energy 

Demonstrated Reserve Base 

(DRB) 

U.S. Geological Survey 

National Coal 

Resources Data System 

(NCRDS) 

Other (Special Cases): 

Keystone Manual 

U.S. Bureau of Land Management 

I 

U.S. Bureau of Mines 

I Analytic File 

U.S. Geological Survey I 

USCHEM File I 

Other (Special Cases): 

Keystone Manual 

U.S. Department of Energy 

logical Survey's Trace element data base file, 

USCHEM, and the Keystone Manual. 

3. The triangular distributions are applied to regional coal 

tonnage to estimate the quantity of surface and underground coal amounts available at specified sulfur content levels. The average Btu content of coal by region 

also is calculated using data from the sources listed in 

step 2 and data from the U.S. Department of Energy . 

Details for each step follow . 

Tonnage 

This study's minable coal resource base estimates 

(with the exceptions noted below for three of the Dynamic 

Coal Allocation Model's (DCAM) coal supply regions) are 

drawn from two sources: the U.S. Department of Energy's 

DRB and the NCRDS (U.S. Geological Survey, 198la, 

198lb, 1982, 1987). The NCRDS contains point-located 

-

-

Coal Tonnage, 

Surface and Underground - by DCAM Supply 

Region 

..... 

-

Triangular Distribution of 

Coal Sulfur Content ,, 

Average Btu Regional Coal Tonnage 

Surface and Underground 

by Sulfur and Btu 

Content 

Figure 81. Procedures for estimating the minable coal resource base. 

Appendix 8-Minable Coal Resource Base Module 33 
EXPLANATION 

Regions 

D 1-24 D 25-49 

Figure 82. Coal supply regions in DCAM. 

coal drill hole and coal depth data. (The procedures the 

NCRDS uses to estimate regional coal resources are 

described below.) The NCRDS coal tonnage estimates are 

based on more recent and more detailed geologic information than the DRB estimates. In regions where NCRDS data 

coverage is extensive, NCRDS estimates of coal tonnages 

are used. In areas where NCRDS coverage is not yet 

adequate, estimates of underground and surface coal resources are based on the DRB. In all cases, the NCRDS data 

used in this study are essentially "as is" from the data files. 

Coal resource estimates for Alabama and North 

Dakota's major coal-producing regions (see regions 3, 80 , 

and 98, table B 1) are drawn from different sources because 

the DRB estimates are outdated and NCRDS coverage is 

incomplete. Alabama supply region 3, surface and underground resources, are taken from the Keystone Manual , 

whose estimates were recently compiled by the Alabama 

State Geological Survey (Keystone Coal Industry Manual, 

1986). North Dakota surface coal resources in regions 80 

and 98 are drawn from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, North Dakota Resource Management Plan (U.S. 

Department of the Interior, 1986). The North Dakota 

estimates are based on recent BLM surveys and the North 

Dakota State Geological Survey. The coal-producing 

regions in Alabama and North Dakota are key areas for 

issues of concern in this study. Alabama supply region 3 is 

important because it contains a large amount of low-sulfur 

- 50-74 - 75-99 

Eastern coal resources. The North Dakota regions are 

important because they contain low-cost surface-minable 

resources that are affected by Federal land-use restrictions. 

DCAM delineates coal supply regions to include 

counties with similar characteristics in terms of their coal 

quality, geology , and topography (see Bernknopf, 1985, p. 

66- 67 , for details). The groupings also reflect natural 

barriers. Table B 1 lists counties assigned to specific coal 

supply regions; figure B2 shows that geographic distribution of the supply regions can include counties in more than 

one State . 

Because supply regions and State boundaries do not 

coincide, several data management steps are followed to 

estimate coal resources for the DCAM coal supply regions. 

1 

Three steps are involved: 

1. The minable coal resource base is compiled at the State 

level for 1985 from DRB, NCRDS, the Keystone 

Manual, and the BLM (table B2). 2 In Alabama, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Wyoming, 

1

Throughout the report, because tonnage estimates are aggregated 

from county estimates, there will be small rounding errors between 

regional and State estimates. These rounding errors sometimes become 

evident when tables in the text and the appendices are compared. 2

The estimates in table B2 are for the base case; Federal land use 

restrictions are assumed not to be in effect. 

34 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
where coal resource estimates are based on NCRDS, 

BLM, or the Keystone Manual, the estimates used in 

this study (columns 1 and 2) are higher than the estimates ofthe DRB as published by the U.S. Department 

of Energy (columns 3 and 4). Underground tonnage is 

11. 3 billion tons greater, and surface tonnage is 90. 1 

billion tons greater. 

2. State estimates are assigned to coal supply regions 

using county data. The Federal government compiled 

county DRB estimates in 1971. The U.S. Geological 

Survey maintains a 1974 file of DRB estimates, which 

was generated using the 1971 State-to-county proportions (compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Mines). These 

proportions were applied to the 1985 DRB State 

estimates to obtain corresponding county estimates. 

Then county estimates were totaled to get DCAM 

supply region estimates. Thus, the DCAM supply 

region estimates for 1985 have two features: ( 1) they 

add to published 1985 DRB State estimates and (2) 

their county resources are the same proportion of State 

resources as in 1971. The use of county shares is the 

only method available to estimate county resources. 

3. Keystone Manual data are used to estimate tonnage in 

Alabama supply region 3. Likewise, NCRDS and BLM 

data are used to estimate tonnage for DCAM supply 

regions in Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and 

Wyoming. 

NCRDS applies special procedures to estimate the 

minable coal tonnage in the Wyoming portion of the 

Powder River basin, where the quantity of coal is large and 

of low-sulfur content. To estimate mining costs for this key 

region, coal resources have been split into three subregions, 

according to the coal beds' depth and other geologic 

features. 

The three subregions are ( 1) the area where coal can 

be mined from the Wyodak bed in Campbell County, Wyo., 

(2) the other coal occurrence areas in Campbell County 

(mainly the Felix bed), and (3) the Wyodak, Smith, and 

Anderson beds in Converse County. The Wyodak bed in 

Campbell County has the country's lowest costing strippable coal. Coal beds average 80 feet in thickness, their 

overburden is 50 to 200 feet, and large-scale mining (up to 

15 million tons per year, currently) in open pits exploits 

economies of scale to achieve low mining costs. In the 

second subregion in Campbell County, coal beds are 

dominated by the Felix bed and have less favorable geologic 

conditions than the Wyodak bed: the coal beds are not as 

thick and are separated by interburden. In addition, overburden (stripping) ratios in this part of the county are greater 

than on the Wyodak bed. Thus, mines on the Felix bed are 

expected to be small scale and high cost relative to mines on 

the Wyodak bed. The Converse County area has a mixture 

of the geologic features contained in the other two areas. 

The Wyodak bed is thinner than the one in Campbell 

County; Smith and Anderson are two other commercially 

attractive coal beds. Mining operations in Converse County 

are relatively small scale and high cost compared to mining 

operations on the Wyodak bed in Campbell County, but 

they are more favorable economically compared to rotential 

mining operations on the Felix bed in Campbell County. 

The NCRDS data, graphic display, and analysis 

techniques were used to estimate strippable coal resources 

in those western coal supply regions that contain sufficient 

coverage (such as the Powder River basin in Wyoming). 3 

NCRDS consists of a variety of data files co~taining 

information about coal's quantity, quality, and geologic 

occurrence. The NCRDS data file, USTRAT, contains 

geologic descriptions of coal-bearing rock strata (including 

thickness) with latitude and longitude locations (x, y); it 

was queried and used to estimate total coal thickness, which 

is based on geographic occurrence, bed thicknesses, and 

bed depth. A subset of "coal only" records was retrieved 

from this data set. (The initial search would have included 

data for some stratigraphic units that did not con~ain any 

coal.) In the case of Campbell County, Wyo. (pa1: of the 

Powder River basin, region 96), coal thicknesses for thin 

rider coal beds to the Wyodak bed were removed in the final 

data set. NCRDS processed this final data set using a 

surface-fitting program to produce a coal thickness contour 

map of all coal at a depth of 250 feet or less. The 250-foot 

depth cutoff was chosen to represent the economic limit for 

surface mining operations in the Western United ~>ates. 

The final data set also was used to estimate overburden ratios (coal depth divided by thickness). The value for 

the depth to the top of the coal was compiled from the drill 

hole data and passed to a surface modeling pr<'gram to 

produce a general coal depth (to the top of the coal) contour 

map. The depth estimates were then divided by the coal 

thickness estimates to produce a general overburden (stripping) ratio map. 

The 250-foot coal depth contour line (the outside 

boundary of all locations having coal down to a maximum 

depth of 250 feet to the bottom of the coal waf used in 

combination with the generalized coal outcrop boundaries 

in each basin to identify the area for strip minir.~ (on or 

inside the 250-foot depth and coal outcrop lines). The strip 

mining boundary was combined with the overburd~n (stripping) ratio contour map to identify the boundarief of areas 

for surface mining, by overburden (stripping) ra+io. Coal 

tonnage in each stripping ratio category was esti'llated by 

multiplying area (in acres) by coal density (in tons per 

acre-foot) by coal thickness (in feet). 

NCRDS data and methods were used to estimate 

strippable coal resources in eight western coal supply 

regions: regions 67, 68, 75, 90, 91, 92, 95, and 96. In 

supply region 96 (the Powder River basin in Wyoning), the 

NCRDS methods (as described in the preceding paragraphs) 

3 A Prime 9750 computer containing the NCRDS data and software 

performed the calculations. 

Appendix B-Minable Coal Resource Base Mo"'ule 35 
also were applied to each of the three subregions that differ 

from each other in terms of coal geology and mining costs. 

The NCRDS estimates of strippable coal resources in the 

eight regions (and by subregion for region 96) are shown in 

table B3 (base case). 

Table B3 also incudes strippable coal resource estimates for supply regions 80 and 98 (BLM estimates) and 

strippable coal resource estimates for supply regions 93 and 

94 (DRB estimates). The 12 DCAM coal supply regions 

shown in table B3 are the supply regions, analyzed in this 

report, where BLM land-use restrictions affect access to 

coal. 

Table B4 provides estimates of strippable and underground coal resources for all 60 DCAM coal supply 

regions. Table B3 estimates are incorporated into table B4. 

Except for the supply region 3 estimate (strippable coal) and 

the estimates for the 12 regions listed in table B3 (strippable 

coal), all estimates in table B4 are based on the DRB. 

Triangular Distributions of Sulfur Content and 

Estimates of Average Btu Content 

Triangular distributions of sulfur content are estimated for each DCAM supply region using three measures 

of sulfur content by weight (on an as-received basis): the 

minimum value, the maximum value, and the average 

sulfur content from coal samples gathered in each region. 

The minimum, maximum, and average values are sufficient 

to specify a triangular probability density function (pdf) of 

sulfur content for each supply region. To assure unbiased 

estimates of distribution parameters, the sample data are 

assumed to be realizations of independent, identically 

distributed random variables for the sampled areas. 4 A 

triangular distribution or pdf of sulfur contents has the 

following form. A new variable a is defined so that 

M-L=a(H-L). (B1) 

That is, a is the proportion of the distance between Hand L 

at which the mode is positioned (relative to L). 

The study lets y represent probability (measured on 

the vertical, or y, axis) and x represent sulfur content 

(measured on the horizontal, or x, axis). The condition that 

area LHK = 1 is used to determine the following equations: 

Line segment LK in figure B3: 

y1 = -2Ua(H-L)2+[2/a(H-L)2]x (B2) 

Line segment KH in figure B3: 

Y2 = 2H/(1-a)(H-L)2 -[21(1-a)(H-L)2]x (B3) 

The average sulfur content A is given by 

M H 

A= fLxy1dx+ fMX"Y2dx (B4) 

4

Since data are drawn from several sources and the method and time 

span of collection are not known precisely, it is difficult to judge whether 

this assumption can be supported. Nonetheless, the study's objective is to 

estimate coal sulfur and Btu content using the latest and best available data 

without introducing any obvious problem of bias. 

K 

y 

L M H X 

PERCENT SULFUR BY WEIGHT (AS REC'::IVED) 

EXPLANATION 

L = Minimum observed sulfur content 

M =Mode 

H = Maximum observed sulfur con·~nt 

Area LHK = 1 (by definition of a pdf) 

Figure 83. Probability density function (pdf) for sulfur 

content. 

Upon integration and simplification 

M=L+3(A-H)+2(H-L). (B5) 

Expression B5 shows that the average (A), hw (L), and 

high (H) sulfur contents are sufficient to definr- a triangular 

pdf. Given L, A, and H, M is obtained by sub~titution into 

equation B5. Proportionality variable a is tl'~n obtained 

from expression B 1. Finally, the pdf (fig. B 3) is obtained 

after appropriate substitution into equations B2 and B3. 

The estimates of the minimum (L), average (A), and 

maximum (H) coal sulfur contents by DCAM S'Ipply region 

are obtained from three data sources: 

1. The U.S. Geological Survey maintain~ the U.S. 

Bureau of Mines' Analytic File that contains estimates 

by county of sulfur content (on a dry basis). An 

"observation," sorted by bedcode or gr'')uped by a 

"dummy" code (when bedcode is not known), contains 

data on the number of analyses including (across those 

analyses) the maximum, minimum, and average sulfur 

contents. The file contains data collected from the 

1920's through the 1960's. It is assumed that coal 

samples in a supply region represent the coal currently 

available there. 5 All samples in a supply region are 

5

Many of the samples are grab samples taken from train cars and 

trucks loaded with coal purchased by the Federal governm'!nt. The long 

time span of the sampling and changes in sampling me•lJ.ods make it 

difficult to judge whether the samples are a good represent'l'tion of sulfur 

for coal still left to be mined (which is the objective of forrling the sulfur 

pdf's). Undoubtedly, some of the coal beds by specific locafon are already 

mined out. Even if they are not mined out, the lateral and vertical spread 

of mining most likely does bring in areas not well represented in the 

sampling file. Furthermore, bedcodes are not available for Many samples. 

In this study, no attempt is made to track sulfur content by coal bed. 

36 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
pooled to estimate the minimum, maximum, and average sulfur contents. Dry basis estimates are converted 

to estimates on an as-received basis. The estimates of 

average moisture content, available for each observation, are used to make the conversion to an as-received 

basis. 

2. The U.S. Geological Survey maintains a file, known as 

USCHEM, of coal quality sample data. USCHEM is a 

dynamic data base. Data collection for it began in the 

mid-1970's. New sample data are being added as they 

become available from State cooperative coal investigation projects and from analyses undertaken by Federal and State research geologists. 6 USCHEM was 

merged with the Bureau of Mines' Analytic File to 

calculate minimum, maximum, and average sulfur 

contents by supply region. 

3. The Keystone Manual is the third source of data for 

estimating the distribution of coal sulfur content. The 

data in the Keystone Manual covers supply regions that 

are not well represented in USCHEM. For those 

regions, Keystone Manual estimates were used in place 

of those developed from the merged Bureau of MinesGeological Survey files. Table B5 provides the final 

estimates of minimum, maximum, and average sulfur 

content by supply region. 

The average Btu of coal by supply region, also, is 

estimated using data from the three sources described above 

and from one other source. The U.S. Department of Energy 

collects data on average Btu content for coal shipments by 

county of origin (form 423 data) (U.S. Department of 

Energy, 1986a, 1986b). These data were judged to be more 

representative (compared to data from the other sources) of 

coal Btu content for certain Western supply regions where 

coal production has been increasing recently. Table B5 lists 

the final estimates of average Btu by supply region. 

Regional Tonnages by Sulfur and Btu Content 

Regional tonnages by sulfur content are estimated by 

applying sulfur distributions (table B5) to the minable coal 

resource base (table B3 for base case and table C1 for 

restricted cases). Calculating regional coal resource tonnage 

by sulfur content takes three or four steps, determined by 

the following rules: 

1. Coal containing up to 0.6lb of sulfur per million Btu is 

very attractive to the market. Such coal can be burned 

outright and still achieve SOx discharge standards 

under State Implementation Plans (SIP) and Federal 

new source performance standards (NSPS). To obtain 

tonnage, the sulfur pdf is integrated up to the 0.6 lb 

limit to ascertain the proportion of the area under the 

~e USCHEM data used in this study (5,201 observations) 

excluded bench samples. Because bench samples often do not represent 

coal beds, they are omitted to reduce an obvious problem of bias. 

pdf that is no more than that limit. That proportion is 

applied to the total estimate of surface and unde~ground 

tonnage for the supply region. The sulfur content 

averaged up to the limit of 0. 6 lb is assignect as the 

sulfur value for the coal tonnage. 

2. When the total remaining proportion of sulfur content 

is greater than 0.5 in all supply regions (otl'~r than 

certain Appalachian regions-see step 3), the region's 

remaining sulfur proportion is halved. Otherwise, the 

proportion remains as estimated. The sulfur content is 

averaged across each proportion. Tonnage b~' sulfur 

content is estimated as the product of the propt'lrtion at 

each sulfur level multiplied by total tonnage, and the 

appropriate average sulfur content is assigned. 

3. Large resource tonnages of remaining low-sulfur Eastem coal are found in certain Appalachian regio~s (3, 4, 

8, 9, 10, 21, and 23-see table B1 and fig. B1 for 

geographic location). Currently, coal mined from these 

regions, up to about 1 percent sulfur or 0.9lb of sulfur 

per million Btu, often is blended with lower sulfur coal 

and burned outright to meet SIP and NSPS standards. 

To capture price and production patterns, to~nage is 

classified according to four sulfur content proryortions: 

0.0 to 0.6lb of sulfur per million Btu, 0.7 to 0.9lb of 

sulfur per million Btu, and two equal proporthns over 

the remaining sulfur content (upper ranges vary by 

region). The sulfur pdf is integrated to determine the 

proportion of tonnage in each of the four sulfu~ content 

classes. Like in steps 1 and 2, multiplying the product 

of the sulfur proportion by the total resourcef yields a 

tonnage estimate for each sulfur content cl ~.ss. The 

sulfur content averaged, by class, is assign~d to the 

tonnage of each class. 

Table B6 compiles the regional estimates o+" deliverable coal tonnage by sulfur and Btu content. 

References 

Bernknopf, Richard L., 1985, Domestic coal distril"•tion: an 

interregional programming model for the U.S. coal industry: 

Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, 230 p. 

Keystone Coal Industry Manual, 1986: New York, McGraw-Hill 

Inc., 1306 p. 

U.S. Department of Energy, 1982a, Energy Information Administration, Eastern coal reserves: Washington, [.C., U.S. 

Government Printing Office, 371 p. 

---1982b, Energy Information Administration, Western coal 

reserves, part 1: Washington, D.C., U.S. G0vernment 

Printing Office, 347 p. 

---1982c, Energy Information Administration, Western coal 

reserves, part 2: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government 

Printing Office, 347 p. 

---1986a, Energy Information Administration, Ccal production 1985: Washington, D.C., U.S. Governme"t Printing 

Office, table A3, p. 97. 

Appendix 8-Minable Coal Resource Base Mo-''-lle 37 
---1986b, Energy Information Administration, Cost and quality of fuels for electric utility plants 1985: Washington, 

D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 212 p. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, 1986, Bureau of Land Management, North Dakota draft Resource Management Plan and 

environmental impact statement: Dickinson, N. Dak., 

Bureau of Land Management, 173 p. 

U.S. Geological Survey. 1981a, Guide for the calculation of coal 

resources using the computer program GARNET: Reston, 

Va., Open-File Report 81-563, 34 p. 

---1981b, Stratigraphic sequence form manual-guide for 

entering the National Coal Resources Data System 

(NCRDS): Reston, Va., Open-File Report 81-562, 11 p. 

---1982, Guide to the use of PACER, the data retrieval and 

update system for the National Coal Resourc~s Data System 

(NCRDS): Reston, Va., Open-File Report 82-291, 99 p. 

---1987, NCRDS data files: Reston, Va., B~anch of Coal 

Geology, Administrative Report, p. 1. 

38 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
APPENDIX C-BLM LAND-USE RESTRICTIONS 

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 

1976 (FLPMA) formally mandates that Federal lands be 

administered to benefit the entire Nation. The principles of 

multiple use and sustained yield are to be achieved through 

a planning process. Managing public lands and associated 

resource values is intended to account for the wide range of 

possible uses for present and future generations (Hagenstein, 1984; Brubaker, 1984). 

Public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) cover some 291 million acres, of which 

177 million acres are in Western States and 114 million 

acres are in Alaska. (A small amount of acreage is in 

Eastern States.) These lands contain range land that contributes to the country's meat and timber supplies. In 

addition, these lands are home to an abundance of wildlife. 

have cultural and historical values, and provide many 

assorted recreational opportunities. The lands also contain a 

significant amount of fossil fuel (U.S. Department of the 

Interior, 1983). Given this variation in types, locations, and 

potential uses of these resources, land-management conflicts are bound to arise. 

The BLM, in fulfilling the requirements of FLPMA, 

the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976, the 

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, and 

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, is required 

to conduct a planning evaluation. This process produces a 

Resource Management Plan (RMP). A RMP is a multipleuse plan that directs management of uses for all resources 

on and under Federal lands. Recognizing the many competing uses of the lands under the BLM' s jurisdiction is 

central to the multiple-use planning process. A plan's 

analysis is a forecast of potential land uses for 10 to 15 

years. Each RMP assesses land-use alternatives within a 

resource management area, independent of other resource 

management areas. 

In any given RMP process, certain land areas are 

identified for limited, restrictive, or exclusive use. One 

outcome of this process is the identification of coal lands 

that are acceptable for further leasing consideration. Lands 

that are subject to coal leasing as dictated under the mineral 

leasing laws are subject to the requirements of 43 CFR 

3420.1, which defines a four-level screening process. The 

first screen identifies land with coal development potential. 

Of all the acres that are presumed to have coal resources 

nationally, BLM is responsible for managing 398 million 

acres that are designated as having future leasing potential 

under the RMP process (U.S. Department of the Interior, 

1985). These areas contain approximately 194.7 billion tons 

of coal. 

BLM' s second screen identifies lands included by the 

first screen that should be restricted lands, off limits to coal 

development. The purpose is to identify, and thus protect, 

the Federal lands' most sensitive and valuable features. The 

second screen employs 20 criteria. Lands that are ursuitable 

for further coal leasing include 

1. existing Federal land systems such as the National 

Park System and National Recreation Areas, 

2. existing rights-of-way and easements, 

3. buffer zones along rights-of-way and adjacent to 

communities and buildings, 

4. wilderness study areas, 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

scenic areas, 

lands being used for scientific study. 

publicly owned places on Federal lands that are 

included in the National Register of Historic Places, 

Federal lands designated as natural area~ or as 

National Natural Landmarks, 

9. federally designated critical habitat for thre2tened or 

endangered plant and animal species, 

10. Federal lands containing habitat that States d ~termine 

to be essential for plant or animal species, 

11. lands containing a bald or golden eagle nest or a 

buffer zone, 

12. bald and golden eagle migration and winter~ng areas 

on Federal lands, 

13. falcon nesting sites and buffer zones on Federal lands, 

14. high-priority habitat for migratory bird spec:~s. 

15. fish and wildlife habitat for resident species on Federal lands as determined by States, 

16. riverine, coastal, and special flood plains necessary to 

protect life and property, 

17. lands that the surface management agency has committed to use as municipal watersheds, 

18. Federal lands with National Resource V.' aters as 

identified by States, and a buffer zone o+' Federal 

lands 1/4 mile from the outer edge of the far banks of 

the water, 

19. alluvial valley floor protection, and 

20. Federal lands with proposed State restrictions. 

Criteria 1, 2. 3, and 6 refer to land status; criteria 4, 5, and 

8 refer to recreational and natural values; criterio!l 7 refers 

to cultural resources; criteria 9 through 15 refer tc wildlife; 

criteria 16 through 19 refer to watersheds; and cr:terion 20 

refers to State-proposed issues. 

The third screen identifies conflicts bet¥·~en coal 

development and the need to protect other resources such 

that they are available for multiple-use activities. If the 

other resources are deemed to be more importrnt or the 

impacts cannot be mitigated, then the coal lands are 

removed from further consideration. 

The fourth screen involves consulting with the surface land owners as to their preference regarding coal 

development. If a significant number of surface owners 

oppose mining operations, the area is to be considered 

suitable only for underground mining. An addend·1m to this 

appendix presents the formal language for ead· criterion 

and the screens. 

Appendix C-BLM land-Use Restrictions 39 
.. ...... 

Rosebud Co. Custer Co. 

ci 

() 

c 

0 

I 

0> 

ill 

.. 

.-: 4 

.. .... 

11 Powder River Co. 

EXPLANATION 

1m Negative surface ow1ership 

• Unsuitability criteria 

111 Multiple use 

rn Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation 

~ Custer National Fore::-t 

County Boundaries 

N 

A 

0 10 10 MILES 

1-------.----'---.----·J 

0 10 20 KILOMETERS 

Area of Det2il 

Figure C1. BLM land-use restrictions on coal lands in the Powder River basin, Montana (supply region 95). 

The screening process has an inherent subjective 

element. For example, the screening process is subject to 

change as society's values evolve, since circumstances 

might well change regarding land-use regulations. 

There might be disagreement as to the appropriate 

size of various types of buffer zones. For instance, a 

redefinition of buffer zones may be required because of 

changes in scientific knowledge, changes in preferences, or 

changes in the endangered species list. Critical habitat 

zones may be expanded or reduced based on the continuing 

development of scientific knowledge. However, predicting 

or projecting these changes is well beyond this study's 

scope. As such, coal lands that the BLM resource management planning screening process could restrict were quantified, using available BLM boundary data. 

Table C 1 presents a sample of lands determined 

unsuitable by the second screening process. This list of 

restricted lands, classified according to the criterion 

applied, is presented to show the restrictions' diversity 

(these data were not utilized in the model process). Examining the table promotes the conclusion that no single 

criterion leads to most or all of the land restrictions. All 

resource management areas have lands restricted due to the 

land-status criteria (1, 2, 3, and 6), while only some of the 

resource planning areas have lands set aside unier wildlifeissue criteria (9 through 15). 

Table C2 presents the number of acres that have been 

removed from consideration for further coal leasing as a 

result of screens 2, 3, and 4. Of the three scre~ns, surface 

owner objections to development restrict the f1~west acres. 

The second and third screens remove a rela+ively equal 

amount of acreage from consideration for future coal 

leasing. The screening process concludes by determining 

the "net" restricted acreage (eliminates any double counting 

of acres), as presented in table C2. 

The Powder River Resource Area in the Powder 

River basin of Montana provides a good exam,le of using 

the screening process. The impact of the land-use restrictions is extensive. Figure C1 illustrates the land-use restrictions for the Montana portion of the basin, revealing the 

total area under consideration for land-use restriction is 

1, 145 ,285 acres. The Custer National Fore~t occupies 

495, 119 acres while the Northern Cheyenne ln'lian Reservation occupies 446,327 acres. The multiple-use screen 

eliminates another 99,090 acres. The unsuitab~lity criteria 

eliminate 104,749 acres. Similar to this example, each 

RMP delineates the amount of land affected. 

40 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Coal Occurrence Boundary, 

Coal at Depth of 250 Feet or Less ~ 

Nonoverlapping Restricted Area 

r 

Figure C2. Boundaries used in NCRDS to estimate 

restricted tonnage by overburden ratio. 

To link the land-use restrictions to the amount of coal 

resources effectively restricted from production, the 

restricted areas' boundaries (as delineated in the associated 

RMP's) were entered into the National Coal Resources Data 

System (NCRDS) for processing by geographic information 

system (GIS) technology. (Fig. C2 illustrates the various 

boundaries used to estimate the restricted acreage.) The 

geographic boundaries of the areas restricted by any combination of screens are overlayed onto the area that may 

contain strippable coal (no more than 250 feet deep). If any 

of the restricted areas overlap, only the outside boundary is 

used, to avoid any double counting of restricted acreage. 

Next, NCRDS delineates the unrestricted area of strippable 

coal, classified by overburden (stripping) ratio. (Appendix 

B also discusses this issue.) The area restricted to surface 

mining is where the base case coal area intersects (separately for each overburden (stripping) ratio category) with 

the "net" restricted area. Multiplying this restricted acreage 

by coal density (tons per acre-foot) and coal thickness (feet) 

estimates restricted tonnage. As a final step, the restricted 

tons are subtracted from the base case tonnage estimate to 

yield the tonnage available for mining after the land-use 

restrictions have been imposed. 

Estimates of coal resources, with and without BLM 

land-use restrictions, were made in the following Dynamic 

Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) supply regions: 67, 68, 

75, 90, 91, 92, 95, and 96. In four other west~rn coal 

supply regions (80, 93, 94, and 98) non-GIS procedures 

were applied because NCRDS data coverage wa~ insufficient. In these four regions, estimates of coal resources 

(restricted case) were based on a proportion of the number 

of restricted acres relative to the number of acres in the base 

case. The base case tons (from table B3) were mult:olied by 

this proportion to estimate each supply region's restricted 

case tonnage. The tonnage and acreage estimate2 for the 

base and restricted cases are taken directly from the BLM 

Resource Management Plans and the U.S. Department of 

Energy's Demonstrated Reserve Base (DRB). 

Table C3 provides estimates of strippable coal tonnage in the 12 western coal supply regions for th~ee cases 

(base, restricted, and unsuitability criteria lifted). Total 

tonnage of strippable coal (base case) in the 12 regions is 

about 173 billion tons' which represents about 71 r~rcent of 

the Nation's strippable coal resources. When BLM land-use 

restrictions are applied, this estimate falls by about 67 

billion tons to approximately 106 billion tons. The estimates 

in the final column show the available tonnage if the 

unsuitability criteria restrictions were lifted. Compared to 

the middle column, an additional14 billion tons of' coal are 

made available for lease and production when tt~ unsuitability criteria land-use restrictions are lifted but the 

multiple-use and surface owner consent restrictions are 

maintained. 

DCAM is used to analyze national coal deliuery costs 

for nine alternative land-use restriction cases (outlined in 

fig. C3). Each case uses the appropriate estimates of 

strippable coal resources from table C3 to determine a base 

case or a restricted case cost. The restricted cases ordinarily 

Policy 1: 

Policy 2: 

Policy 3: 

EXPLANATION 

£::,. Beginn;ng year for 45 

1985 (No land-Use Restrictions) 2030 year pl3nning horizon. 

1985 (All land-Use Restrictions) 2030 

1985 2030 

(No Unsuitability Criteria Restrictions) 

(Other Restrictions in Place) 

All costs discounted 

back to this year. 

Policy 4: 1 /\ 

1985 (All) 2000 (All) 2045 

Policy 5: ____ ....L.:.,__ _______ _j 

Policy 6: 

Policy7: 

Policy 8: 

Policy 9: 

1985 (All) 2000 2045 

1985 

1985 

1985 

1985 

(No Unsuitability Criteria Restrictions) 

(Other Restrictions in Place) 

(All) 

(All) 

(All) 

(All) 

2010 (All) 2055 

2010 2055 

(No Unsuitability Criteria Restrictions) 

(Other Restrictions in Place) 

2020 (All) 2065 

2020 2065 

(No Unsuitability Criteria Restrictions) 

(Other Restrictions in Place) 

Figure C3. Alternative land-use restriction poli-::y cases. 

Appendix C-BLM Land-Use Restrictions 41 
will have higher costs than the base case because the 

restrictions limit coal shipments from low-cost coal supply 

regions. 

The nine alternative policy cases shown in figure C3 

are paired with each other (as appropriate) and analyzed as 

"with" and "without" cases to provide the following estimates of additional national costs or savings: 

Policy 2 versus Policy 1 

Policy 3 versus Policy 2 

Policy 5 versus Policy 4 

Policy 7 versus Policy 6 

Policy 9 versus Policy 8 

Additional costs of imposing all 

land-use restrictions, from the 

vantage point of the year 1985. 

Cost savings if unsuitability 

criteria restrictions are lifted in 

1985. from the vantage point of 

the year 1985. 

Cost savings if unsuitability 

criteria restrictions are lifted in 

2000. from the vantage point of 

the year 2000. 

Cost savings if unsuitability 

criteria restrictions are lifted in 

2010. from the vantage point of 

the year 20 lO. 

Cost savings if unsuitability 

criteria restrictions are lifted in 

2020. from the vantage point of 

the year 2020. 

In all policy comparisons, the planning horizon is 

kept constant at 45 years. Mining, scrubbing, and transportation costs are in present value terms discounted back to the 

planning horizon's initial year. The cost difference between 

policy 2 and policy 1 is an estimate of the opportunity costs 

of Federal land-use restrictions for the 45-year period from 

1985 to 2030. The other cases examine the cost savings of 

lifting or eliminating the unsuitability criteria land-use 

restrictions at various future times. 

ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX C 

Criteria for Assessing Lands Unsuitable for All 

or Certain Stipulated Methods of Coal Mining 

Source: Office of the Federal Register, 1986, Public 

Lands: Interior, 43 CFR 1000-3999. 

This addendum describes the criteria for assessing 

whether lands are unsuitable for coal leasing. Three different screens are detailed: Screen #2-unsuitability criteria; 

Screen #3 -multiple-use conflicts; and Screen #4- surface owner consent. 

Unsuitability Criteria: Screen #2 

A. Criterion Number 1 

All Federal lands included in the following land 

systems or categories shall be considered unsuitable: 

National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge Systern. National System of Trails, National Wilderness 

Preservation System, National Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System, National Recreation Areas, lands acquired 

with money derived from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, National Forests, and Fedr.ral lands in 

incorporated cities, towns, and villages. 

1. Exceptions 

(a) A lease may be issued within the boundaries 

of any National Forest if th~ Secretary 

[Department of Agriculture] finds no significant recreational, timber, economic or other 

values which may be incompati'~le with the 

lease~ and (a) surface operations and impacts 

are incident to an underground c~1al mine, or 

(b) where the Secretary of Agric'~lture determines, with respect to lands w'"'ich do not 

have significant forest cover within those 

National Forests west of the 100th Meridian, 

that surface mining may be in compliance 

with the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 

1960, the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments 

Act of 1976 and the Surface Miring Control 

and Reclamation Act of 1977. 

(b) A lease may be issued within the Custer 

National Forest with the coment of the 

Department of Agriculture as long as no 

surface coal mining operations are permitted. 

2. Exemptions 

The application of this criterion to lands within the 

listed land systems and categories if subject to 

valid existing rights, and does not appl,y to surface 

coal mining operations existing on August 3, 

1977. The application of the porthn of this 

criterion applying to land proposed for inclusion 

in the listed systems does not apply to lands to 

which substantial legal and financial ccmmitments 

were made prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

B. Criterion Number 2 

Federal lands that are within rights-of-wry or easements or within surface leases for residential, commercial industrial, or other public purposes, on federally 

owned surface shall be considered unsuital~ ~. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued, and mining operations 

approved, in such areas if the surface management 

agency determines that: 

(a) All or certain types of coal development 

(e.g. , underground mining) will n1t interfere 

with the right-of-way or easement; or 

(b) The right-of-way or easement was granted for 

mining purposes; or 

42 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
(c) The right-of-way or easement was issued for 

a purpose for which it is not being used; or 

(d) The parties involved in the right-of-way or 

easement agree in writing to leasing; or 

(e) It is impractical to exclude such areas due to 

the location of coal and method of mining and 

such areas or uses can be protected through 

appropriate stipulations. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which included 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

C. Criterion Number 3 

Federal lands affected by section 522(e) (4) and (5) of 

the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 

1977 shall be considered unsuitable. This includes 

lands within 100 feet of a cemetery, or within 300 feet 

of any public building, school, church, community or 

institutional building or public park or within 300 feet 

of an occupied dwelling. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued for lands: 

(a) Used as mine access roads or haulage roads 

that join the right-of-way for a public road; 

(b) For which the Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement has issued a 

permit to have public roads relocated; 

(c) If, after public notice and opportunity for 

public hearing in the locality, a written finding is made by the authorized officer that the 

interests of the public and the landowners 

affected by mining within 100 feet of a public 

road will be protected~ 

(d) For which owners of occupied dwellings 

have given written permission to mine within 

300 feet of their buildings. 

2. Exemptions 

The application of this criterion is subject to valid 

existing rights, and does not apply to surface coal 

mining operations existing on August 3, 1977. 

D. Criterion Number 4 

Federal lands designated as wilderness study areas 

shall be considered unsuitable while under review by 

the Administration and the Congress for possible 

wilderness designation. For any Federal land which is 

to be leased or mined prior to completion of the 

wilderness inventory by the surface management 

agency, the environmental assessment or impact statement on the lease sale or mine plan shall consider 

whether the land possesses the characteristics of a 

wilderness study area. If the finding is affirmative, the 

land shall be considered unsuitable, unless issuance of 

noncompetitive coal leases and mining on lea"'es is 

authorized under the Wilderness Act and the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. 

1. Exemption 

The application of this criterion to lands for which 

the Bureau of Land Management is the surface 

management agency and lands in designate1 wilderness areas in National Forests is subJ~ct to 

valid existing rights. 

E. Criterion Number 5 

Scenic Federal lands designated by visual resource 

management analysis as Class I (an area of outstanding 

scenic quality or high visual sensitivity) but not currently on the National Register of Natural Landmarks 

shall be considered unsuitable. A lease may be issued 

if the surface management agency determines that 

surface coal mining operations will not significantly 

diminish or adversely affect the scenic quality of the 

designated area. 

1. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to wh:~h the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were bein~ conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

F. Criterion Number 6 

Federal lands under permit by the surface management 

agency, and being used for scientific studies im'0lving 

food or fiber production, natural resources, or t~chnology demonstrations and experiments shall be considered unsuitable for the duration of the study, demonstration or experiment, except where mining could be 

conducted in such a way as to enhance or not jeopardize the purposes of the study, as determined by the 

surface management agency, or where the principal 

scientific user or agency gives written concurr"~nce to 

all or certain methods of mining. 

1. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to wHch the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977 ~ or which include 

operations on which a permit has been is~ued. 

G. Criterion Number 7 

All publicly owned places on Federal lands which are 

included in the National Register of Historic Places 

shall be considered unsuitable. This shall include areas 

that the surface management agency determines, after 

consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic 

Preservation and the State Historic Preservation 

Officer, are necessary to protect the inherent values of 

the property that made it eligible for listing in the 

National Register. 

Addendum to Appendix C 43 
1. Exceptions 

All or certain stipulated methods of coal mining 

may be allowed if, after consultation with the 

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the 

State Historic Preservation Officer, they are 

approved by the surface management agency, 

and, where appropriate, the State or local agency 

with jurisdiction over the historic site. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977~ or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

H. Criterion Number 8 

Federal lands designated as natural areas or as National 

Natural Landmarks shall be considered unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued and mining operation 

approved in an area or site if the surface management agency determines that: 

(a) With the concurrence of the State, the area or 

site is of regional or local significance only; 

(b) The use of appropriate stipulated mining 

technology will result in no significant 

adverse impact to the area or site; or 

(c) The mining of the coal resource under appropriate stipulations will enhance information 

recovery (e.g., paleontological sites). 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which includes 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

I. Criterion Number 9 

Federally designated critical habitat for threatened or 

endangered plant and animal species, and habitat for 

Federal threatened or endangered species which is 

determined by the Fish and Wildlife Service and the 

surface management agency to be of essential value and 

where the presence of threatened or endangered species 

has been scientifically documented, shall be considered 

unsuitable. 

1. Exemptions 

A lease may be issued and mmmg operations 

approved if, after consultation with the Fish and 

Wildlife Service, the Service determines that the 

proposed activity is not likely to jeopardize the 

continued existence of the listed species and/or its 

critical habitat. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lan<is to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977~ on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

J. Criterion Number 10 

Federal lands containing habitat determined to be critical or essential for plant or animal species listed by a 

State pursuant to State law as endangere1 or threatened 

shall be considered unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued and mmmg operations 

approved if, after consultation witl' the State, the 

surface management agency deter11ines that the 

species will not be adversely affected by all or 

certain stipulated methods of coal mining. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has teen issued. 

K. Criterion Number 11 

A bald or golden eagle nest or site on Federal lands 

that is determined to be active and C''l appropriate 

buffer zone of land around the nest site shall be 

considered unsuitable. Consideration of availability of 

habitat for prey species and of terrain shall be included 

in the determination of buffer zones. Buffer zones 

shall be determined in consultation witl' the Fish and 

Wildlife Service. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued if: 

(a) It can be conditioned in such a way, either in 

manner or period of operation, that eagles 

will not be disturbed during breeding season; 

or 

(b) The surface management agency, with the 

concurrence of the Fish and Wildlife Service, 

determines that the golden eagle nest(s) will 

be moved. 

(c) Buffer zones may be decreased if the surface 

management agency determines that the 

active eagle nests will not be adversely 

affected. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to landf to which the 

operator made substantial legal and f'lancial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

44 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
L. Criterion Number 12 

Bald and golden eagle roost and concentration areas on 

Federal lands used during migration and wintering 

shall be considered unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued if the surface management 

agency determines that all or certain stipulated 

methods of coal mining can be conducted in such 

a way, and during such periods of time, to ensure 

that eagles shall not be adversely disturbed. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

M. Criterion Number 13 

Federal lands containing a falcon (excluding kestrel) 

cliff nesting site with an active nest and a buffer zone 

of Federal land around the nest site shall be considered 

unsuitable. Consideration of availability of habitat for 

prey species and of terrain shall be included in the 

determination of buffer zones. Buffer zones shall be 

determined in consultation with the Fish and Wildlife 

Service. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued where the surface management agency, after consultation with the Fish and 

Wildlife Service, determines that all or certain 

stipulated methods of coal mining will not 

adversely affect the falcon habitat during the 

periods when such habitat is used by the falcons. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

N. Criterion Number 14 

Federal lands which are high priority habitat for 

migratory bird species of high Federal interest on a 

regional or national basis, as determined jointly by the 

surface management agency and the Fish and Wildlife 

Service, shall be considered unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued where the surface management agency, after consultation with the Fish and 

Wildlife Service, determines that all or certain 

stipulated methods of coal mining will not 

adversely affect the migratory bird habitat during 

the periods when such habitat is used by the 

species. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which i'lclude 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

0. Criterion Number 15 

Federal lands which the surface management agency 

and the State jointly agree are fish and wildlife habitat 

for resident species of high interest to the SUIte and 

which are essential for maintaining these r'iority 

wildlife species shall be considered unsuitable. Examples of such lands which serve a critical funcfrm for 

the species involved include: 

(1) Active dancing and strutting grounds fer sage 

grouse, sharp-tailed grouse, and prairie chicken; 

(2) Winter ranges most critical for deer, an .. P.lope, 

and elk; and 

(3) Migration corridors for elk. 

A lease may be issued if, after consultation with the State, 

the surface management agency determines that all or 

certain stipulated methods of coal mining will not have a 

significant long-term impact on the species being prctected. 

1. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to wl'ich the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were beirg conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

P. Criterion Number 16 

Federal lands in riverine, coastal and special floodplains (100-year recurrence interval) on which the 

surface management agency determines that mining 

could not be undertaken without substantial threat of 

loss of life or property shall be considered un~uitable 

for all or certain stipulated methods of coal mining. 

1. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to wl-tich the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; ou which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

Q. Criterion Number 17 

Federal lands which have been committed by the 

surface management agency to use as municiprl watersheds shall be considered unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued where the surface management agency in consultation with the municipality 

(incorporated entity) or the responsible governmental unit determines, as a result of studies, that 

Addendum to Appendix C 45 
all or certain stipulated methods of coal mining 

will not adversely affect the watershed to any 

significant degree. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

R. Criterion Number 18 

Federal lands with National Resource Waters, as 

identified by States in their water quality management 

plans, and a buffer zone of Federal lands 114 mile from 

the outer edge of the far banks of the water, shall be 

unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

The buffer zone may be eliminated or reduced in 

size where the surface management agency determines that it is not necessary to protect the 

National Resource Waters. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lands to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations were being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has been issued. 

S. Criterion Number 19 

Federal lands identified by the surface management 

agency, in consultation with the State in which they are 

located, as alluvial valley floors according to the 

definition in 3400.0-5(a) of this title, the standards in 

30 CPR Part 822, the final alluvial valley floor guidelines of the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 

Enforcement when published, and approved State programs under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, where mining would interrupt, 

discontinue, or preclude farming, shall be considered 

unsuitable. Additionally, when mining Federal land 

outside an alluvial valley floor would materially damage the quantity or quality of water in surface or 

underground water systems that would supply alluvial 

valley floors, the land shall be considered unsuitable. 

1. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to surface coal 

mining operations which produced coal in commercial quantities in the year preceding August 3, 

1977, or which had obtained a permit to conduct 

surface coal mining operations. 

T. Criterion Number 20 

Federal lands in a State to which is applicable a 

criterion (1) adopted by that State, and (2) adopted by 

rule making by the Secretary, shall be considered 

unsuitable. 

1. Exceptions 

A lease may be issued when: 

(a) Such criterion is adopted by the Secretary less 

than 6 months prior to the publication of the 

draft comprehensive land use rlan or land use 

analysis, plan or supplement to a comprehensive land use plan, for the arez in which such 

land is included, or 

(b) After consultation with the State, the surface 

management agency determines that all or 

certain stipulated methods of coal mining will 

not adversely affect the value which the 

criterion would protect. 

2. Exemptions 

This criterion does not apply to lancts to which the 

operator made substantial legal and financial commitments prior to January 4, 1977; on which 

surface coal mining operations w~re being conducted on August 3, 1977; or which include 

operations on which a permit has l'~en issued. 

Multiple-Use Conflicts: Screen #3 

The applicable coal planning regulation for multipleuse conflicts is 43 CPR 3420.1-4e(3) which states that 

"multiple land use decisions shall be made which may 

eliminate additional coal deposits from further consideration for leasing, to protect resource values of locally 

important or unique nature not included in th~ unsuitability 

criteria ... "(Office of the Federal Register, 1986, p. 536). 

In the RMP process a variety of guidelines were developed 

depending upon the characteristics of the area. 

Surface Owner Consultation Process: Screen #4 

As part of preparing a comprehensive land use plan, 

the BLM is required to consult with all snrface owners 

meeting certain criteria (43 CPR 342.1-4(i)). If a significant number of surface owners in an "area have expressed a 

preference against mining those deposits l';r other than 

underground techniques that area shall te considered 

acceptable for further consideration only for development 

by underground mining techniques (Office of the Federal 

Register, 1986, p. 537). Typically, the proce<;'s was one of 

mailing the appropriately identified land owners a survey. 

References 

Brubaker, Sterling. 1984, Issues and summary of Federal land 

tenure, in Brubaker, Sterling, ed., Rethinki.,g the Federal 

lands: Washington, D.C .. Resources for the Future, Inc., 

p. 1-31. 

Hagenstein, Perry R., 1984, The Federal lands today: uses and 

limits, in Brubaker, Sterling, ed., Rethinki1g the Federal 

lands: Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future, Inc., 

p. 74-121. 

46 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Office of the Federal Register, 1986, Public lands: Interior, 43 

CFR 1000-3999: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government 

Printing Office (revised October 1), 904 p. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, 1983, Bureau of Land Management, BLM planning: a guide to resource management 

planning on the public lands: Washington, D.C., U.S. 

Government Printing Office. 

---1985, Bureau of Land Management, Federal coal rranagement program: final environmental impact statement supplement, v. I and II and appendices: Washington, D.C., U.S. 

Government Printing Office, 623 p. 

Addendum to Appendix C 47 
APPENDIX D-COAL MINING COSTS 

MODULE 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) uses 

an engineering process model of coal mining operations 

called the Resource Allocation and Mine Costing Model 

(RAMC), developed by the U.S. Department of Energy. 

Because RAMC documentation exists (U.S. Department of 

Energy, 1982, 1983a. 1983b) this appendix emphasizes 

data linkage and modifications made to the RAMC system 

for application in DCAM. 

RAMC' s purpose is to estimate initial and replacement capital investment costs and mine operating costs for 

different mine types (surface or underground), mining 

methods (for example, shaft/slope versus drift), geologic 

settings. and mine size. The costs are estimated using 

equations developed for five model surface mines and for 

four model underground mines. Certain geologic characteristics, including total regional tonnage, overburden ratios 

for surface mines. and seam depths and thicknesses for 

underground mines, influence mining costs. Mine size is 

another important determinant of cost due to economies of 

scale associated with large operations. In western supply 

regions, where economies of scale for large surface mines 

can be achieved, ranges of values in data categories, such as 

regional tonnage, mine size, and overburden ratios, have 

been altered from the original RAMC data base. All 

regional distributions of mine sizes are estimated using 

1985 data from the Energy Information Administration 

(EIA) form 7A (U.S. Department of Energy, 1986). Coal 

production data by mine size are distributed and blocked 

into quartiles (equal to 25 percent of total regional tonnage). 

Each quartile's average mine size becomes the representative mine size for each block of coal tonnage. 

Overburden ratios are determined using National 

Coal Resources Data System (NCRDS) data for coal bed 

thickness and depth (see Appendix B). Table D1 lists the 

estimated distributions of overburden ratios for western coal 

supply regions. 

Using the Minable Coal Resource Base Module's 

regional tonnage estimates (table B4), RAMC allocates 

tonnages available to be produced in surface and underground mines of different sizes. To determine annual 

supply. four steps are followed to estimate what each supply 

region can produce: 

1. The initial resource base is reduced by an engineering 

factor to account for inaccessible resources inherent in 

the extraction process. 

2. The remainder is allocated to each mine size using a 

mine size distribution. 

3. The amount of coal produced annually ip. each mine is 

set at the mine size adjusted for the rercent of coal 

recoverable by mining method. 

4. Total potential production or supply for a particular 

mine size is calculated by multiplying mine production 

(over the mine life) by the number of mines that can be 

supported by total resources allotted at that mine size. 

These steps illustrate why the tonnage available to the 

market (or deliverable coal tonnage) is dift~rent from the 

total minable coal resource base tonnage (se~ comparisons 

in table D2). Overall, deliverable tonnage i~ 57 percent of 

the minable coal resource base estimates. 

Differences in coal accessibility and recoverability 

vary among regions. The accessibility/recov~ry factors for 

underground resources are low compared to the same 

factors for surface resources. Therefore, supply regions 

where underground resources dominate will have a low 

overall recovery proportion, and regions where surface 

resources dominate will have a high overall recovery 

proportion. Examples of the former are su.,ply region 9 

(Pikeville, Ky.) and supply region 21 (Charle2~on, W.Va.). 

Examples of the latter are supply region 95 (Powder River 

basin, Montana) and supply region 96 (Powder River basin, 

Wyoming). 

The purpose of table D2 is to tally, by supply region, 

deliverable coal tonnage as used in this analysis. The 

estimates provide a point of comparison with other estimates, such as the U.S. Department of Ene"'gy' s Demonstrated Reserve Base (DRB) estimates. 

A financial calculation for each mine size is based on 

capital and operating costs, taxes, capital derreciation, and 

other charges, such as black lung taxes. Tal:lle D3 shows 

RAMC equations for estimating initial capital costs, 

deferred capital costs, and annual operating costs. A minimum selling price that returns sufficient revenue to cover all 

costs and provides a specified real rate of return on 

investment is calculated. The selling price and tonnage 

constitute a tonnage-cost or tonnage-price step on a regional 

resource cost schedule. 

The number of tonnage-cost combina~ions over all 

supply regions initially generated by RAMC exceeds the 

400 to 500 supply steps desired to achieve a Porkable level 

of supply detail. For practical application, tonnage-cost 

estimates by supply region (and within sup:"Jly region by 

sulfur content) are pooled across surface anc underground 

mines; the pooled costs are distributed; and average costs 

are calculated for the first two quartiles and the top half of 

the cost distribution. Thus, a supply region with three sulfur 

categories is represented by a tonnage-cost schedule with 

nine steps-the three sulfur levels paired with three cost 

levels, and so on. Each step shows a total mining cost 

versus tonnage (from surface and undergrourri operations) 

at a specified sulfur and Btu content level. Table D4 

provides regional tonnage-cost schedules. 

48 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
References 

U.S. Department of Energy, 1982, Energy Information Administration, Documentation of the Resource Allocation and Mine 

Costing (RAMC) model: Washington, D.C .. DOE/NBB0020, 160 p. 

---1983a, Energy Information Administration, RAMC surface mining cost equations development: Washington, 

D.C., DOE/EIA-0432, 163 p. 

---1983b, Energy Information Administration, RAMC underground mining cost equations development: Wash:'lgton, 

D.C., DOE/EIA-0433, 285 p. 

---1986, Energy Information Administration, Coal production 1985: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government f·inting 

Office, appendix E, p. 125-128. 

Appendix D-Coal Mining Costs Modure 49 
APPENDIX E-COAL SOx REMOVAL AND 

SCRUBBING COSTS MODULE 

Sulfur dioxide (SOx) scrubbing expense is part of the 

effective cost of using a specific type of coal, so SOx 

scrubbing costs are included on the supply side of the 

Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) to facilitate the 

search for the lowest delivered coal cost in the Market 

Simulation Model (MSM). Each step on the regional coal 

tonnage-cost schedule is a potential block of coal that can be 

mined and scrubbed to meet coal demands subject to 

various SOx discharge and scrubbing regulations. SOx 

scrubbing requirements and costs vary according to Federal 

and State regulations (summarized in table El). Electric 

generating plants and industrial plants using coal fall into 

three classes to correspond with Federal and State SOx 

discharge regulations. 

1. The first coal utilization class includes (i) electric 

utility boilers with construction start-up dates before 

August 1971, (ii) small industrial boilers (heat input 

not more than 25,000 tons of coal containing 24 million 

Btu per ton annually), and (iii) large industrial boilers 

(heat input greater than 25,000 tons annually) on-line 

before 1986. Boilers in these three categories must 

meet State Implementation Plan (SIP) limits, which 

are set to achieve national ambient air quality standards. In principle, the SIP standards can be met by 

burning low-sulfur coal, scrubbing SOx from stack 

gases, or combining low-sulfur coal with coals that 

require scrubbing. Currently, only a few SIP boilers 

have scrubbers (U.S. Department of Energy, 1986), 

and scrubber retrofit is costly (Energy Ventures Analysis, Inc., 1986). Moreover, low-sulfur coal supplies 

are large enough to allow SIP standards to be met for 

45 years. Therefore, this analysis does not provide SOx 

scrubbing options for these SIP demands. 

2. The second coal utilization class includes (i) electric 

utility boilers with construction start-up dates after 

August 1971 and before October 1978 and (ii) large 

industrial boilers (heat input more than 25,000 tons of 

coal containing 24 million Btu per ton annually) on-line 

after 1985. The Federal new source performance standards (NSPS) limit discharges from these two types of 

coal users to 1.2 lb of SOx per million Btu heat input. 

Options to meet NSPS standards include burning lowsulfur coal, scrubbing, or using a combination of both. 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) estimates costs for two levels of scrubbing: coal scrubbed 

at 70 percent SOx removal level or higher to meet 0. 6 

lb of SOx per million Btu (low scrubbing) and, alternatively, coal scrubbed at a 90 percent SOx removal 

level to meet 1.2 lb of SOx per million Btu (high 

scrubbing). 

3. The third coal utilization class includes electric utility 

boilers with construction start-up dates after October 

1978. Under the revised new sourer. performance 

standards (RNSPS), boilers in this class must scrub at 

least 70 percent of the SOx from stack gases. The 

discharge standard is 0.6 lb of SOx per million Btu if 

stack gas scrubbing is less than 90 percent. At a 

scrubber removal efficiency of 90 perc~~nt or greater, 

the discharge standard is 1. 2 lb of SOx r~r million Btu 

heat input. 

NSPS and RNSPS scrubbing costs are estimated 

using an engineering process model of a wet limestone SOx 

scrubbing process installed in a 500 MW power plant 

(Pedco Environmental, Inc., 1979). Four additive cost 

categories comprise the total scrubbing cost: capital equipment costs-including costs of a sludge pond, operating and 

maintenance costs, penalty costs for generating capacity 

downgrade (primarily due to pressure loss across scrubber), 

and penalty costs for energy the scrubber us~d. 

The engineering process model (Pedcc Environmental, Inc., 1979) calculates scrubbing cost as a function of 

coal type, SOx removal level, and flue gas flo•v rate through 

the scrubbing unit. Table E2 provides co<;'t factors for 

estimating scrubbing costs. At a given perc~ntage rate of 

gas flow treated, costs increase as removal hvel increases 

(as the entries across each row in table E2 show). Likewise, 

as the percent of gas treated increases, costr increase at a 

given removal level (as the entries down ea~h column by 

cost category in table E2 show). For the coal types DCAM 

used, costs are lowest for bituminous, int~rmediate for 

subbituminous, and highest for lignite. 

Scrubbing costs, which are related clcc;:ely to sulfur 

and Btu content, are calculated for each step of the regional 

coal tonnage-cost schedule. Five steps are fcllowed: 

1. The SOx removal level is calculated to m~et a specified 

discharge limit (0.6 or 1.2 lb of SOx per million Btu 

heat input) as follows: 

U-T 

where 

U = unscrubbed or initial sulfur level (p':lunds of SOx 

per million Btu) and 

T = the target sulfur level (pounds of SOx per million 

Btu) 

2. As a design factor, the percentage of gas flow through 

the scrubbing unit is calculated accordin~ to 

[((u-n;U) * 1001 + o.9 

The term 0.9 is an adjustment factor that assumes 10 

percent of scrubber capacity will be shut off for repairs. 

Compared to the SOx removal level, the de21gn gas flow 

factor is more important for determining scrubbing costs. 

Consequently, as the target SOx removal lev~l drops, it is 

cost effective to reduce gas flow design capacity and 

increase the effective removal efficiency to n'~et the target 

discharge limit. The unit costs in table E2 reflect this 

favorable cost tradeoff (compare row unit cost~ with column 

unit costs). 

50 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
3. Coal type is determined on the basis of Btu: coal type 

is bituminous if Btu exceeds 12,000 Btu per pound, 

coal type is subbituminous if Btu is between 12,000 

and 10,500 Btu per pound, and coal type is lignite if 

Btu is less than 10,500 Btu per pound. 

4. Unit costs are interpolated from table E2 on the basis of 

coal type, design gas flow factor, and SOx removal 

level. 

5. Capacity and energy penalties are converted from 

percentages to costs (mills per kilowatt hour) by 

multiplying the combined penalty factors (as fractions) 

by the cost (at 43 mills per kilowatt hour) of electricity 

forfeited. Then penalty costs are added to capital and 

operating costs and all costs increased by 4.3 percent to 

reflect administrative overhead. 

Table E3 shows the final scrubbing cost estimates. 1 

Each step on the regional coal tonnage-cost schedule 

has three options for meeting an NSPS boiler demand: coal 

burned and unscrubbed, coal burned and scrubbed at the 

low level, or coal burned and scrubbed at the high level. 

Delivered costs for meeting NSPS demands are increased 

1

The scrubbing cost estimates developed here using the Pedco model 

have been compared with estimates made by Energy Ventures Analysis, 

Inc. (1984) using an SOx scrubbing cost model the Tennessee Valley 

Authority developed. Cost estimates from the two studies are within about 

5 percent of each other. 

by the scrubbing costs (either zero or the amounts in table 

E3) according to coal step and scrubbing option. 

Coal burned in RNSPS boilers must be scrub bed to 

meet either low or high scrubbing levels (equal to or greater 

than 70 percent to meet 0.6lb of SOx discharged per million 

Btu, or 90 percent SOx removal efficiency, respectively). 

This analysis assumed that boiler operators minimize costs. 

Accordingly, the Coal SOx Removal and Scrubbing: Costs 

module searches for the lower cost scrubbing option 

between the low and high options. Only the lower scnbbing 

cost by coal step (as table E3 shows) is included in the 

delivered costs of coal that is available for combus+ion in 

RNSPS boilers. 

References 

Energy Ventures Analysis, Inc., 1984, Updated fgd systen costs: 

Arlington, Va. (prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 17 p. 

--1986, Evaluation of S02 emissions and the fgd retrofit 

feasibility at the 200 top emitting generating stations: 

Arlington, Va. (prepared for the U.S. Environmen•al Protection Agency), 28 p. 

Pedco Environmental, Inc., 1979, Cost analysis of lime-based flue 

gas desulfurization systems for new 500-MW utility boilers: 

Cincinnati, Ohio (prepared for the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency), 54 p. 

U.S. Department of Energy, 1986, Energy Information Administration, Cost and quality of fuels for electric utility plants 

1985: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 

table 28, p. 30-34. 

Appendix E-Coal SOx Removal and Scrubbing Costs Module 51 
APPENDIX F-COAL TRANSPORTATION 

COSTS MODULE 

Coal transportation rates are estimated for the following modes of transport: regular rail, unit train, combination 

rail/barge, barge, and electric transmission from mine 

mouth power plants (see Bernknopf, 1985, for details). 

Modifications made for this analysis are summarized 

below. 

Unit train and regular rail rates were estimated using 

equations (table F1) and data from Bernknopf (1985). The 

rate forecasts were scanned for anomalies between rate and 

haul distance; revisions were based on recently published 

rates and the remaining rate forecasts from the rate equations. 

A barge transport rate equation (in 1985 $/ton) was 

estimated as follows: 

Barge Rate= 1.25+0.013 (Miles)-0.015 (Delay) 

(0.0005) (0.0036) 

where 

Miles= distance between origin and destination points along 

the river 

Delay=transit time delay in hours (to account for waiting 

time at certain locks) 

No. in parentheses=standard errors 

R2= 0.92 

No. of observations = 157 

The data used to estimate the barge rate equation are from 

Bernknopf ( 1985). 

The barge rate equation estimates barge-only and the 

barge part of rail/barge rates for about 12,000 origindestination pairs. The study assumed that coal is transported 

from a mine to a loading dock, then loaded onto a barge for 

transport to its riverside destination. Table F2 lists the 

loading docks used to estimate rail/barge rates. If the 

loading dock is within the origin coal supply region, it is 

assumed that coal is transported via truck or conveyor belt 

from the mine onto the barge at a cost of $1.60 per ton 

(1985 dollars). When the loading dock is not within the 

origin coal supply region, coal is transported to the loading 

dock by unit train or regular rail, whichever costs less. 

Transfer costs at the loading dock are assumed to be $1.00 

per ton ( 1985 dollars). The remaining transport cost to the 

destination is a barge cost. Destinations are limited to 

demand regions that can be reached on barge-navigable 

rivers. 

River lock capacity limits barge transport. Lock 

capacity constraints are estimated using U.S. Army Corps 

of Engineers (1984) data. Table F3 shows lock locations 

and capacities. In the Market Simulation Model (MSM), 

barge shipments for each origin and destination follow 

certain river routes that loading docks and destinations 

determine. Along each route, as locks are encountered, the 

barge tonnage is tallied against the lock capacities. 

An alternative to coal transport is to c1nstruct a mine 

mouth power plant and transmit coal, in the form of electric 

energy over high-voltage transmission lines, to the demand 

center. An electric transmission rate equation for this type 

of coal transport was developed from engineering concepts 

(lcerman, 1974): 

Transmission rate (1985 $/ton) = (Btu Factor) * 8.4 

where Btu Factor = (actual coal Btu per lb)/12,000. 

The transmission rate equation is applied only for 

transport distances of 400 miles or less. Line losses and 

rapidly increasing marginal costs after a1: out 400 miles 

effectively limit transmission distances. Th~ rate of $8.40 

per ton is a normalized rate for coal con .. aining 12,000 

Btullb (Btu factor = 1). For a higher Btu coal, more Btu's 

are transmitted per ton of coal combusted at the mine mouth 

power plant. In effect, transport costs per ton of coal are 

higher. Similarly, for a low-Btu coal, relativ~ly fewer Btu's 

are transmitted; the effective transport cost p~r ton of coal is 

low compared to a high-Btu coal. The Dynamic Coal 

Allocation Model (DCAM) limits areas to which coal can 

be transported via mine mouth transmission to demand 

regions that overlap supply regions with nonzero transmission capacity. DCAM limits mine mouth transmission, as 

well as the related capacity constraint, to areas where 

transmission corridors existed as of 197 5. For later years in 

the forecast period, DCAM raises transmission limits in line 

with the growth in electric utility coal demands over 1975 

levels (table F4). Two assumptions suppo't these procedures for modeling transmission: (1) the costs of securing 

rights-of-way for additional transmission ccrridors will be 

high and limit new corridors and (2) additional transmission 

capacity can be installed in existing corridc rs if economic 

conditions are favorable. 

The Coal Transportation Costs moiule has very 

complete data sets in terms of coverage of DCAM supply 

and demand regions. Consequently, the module can estimate rail and rail/barge rates for over 27,000 origindestination pairs. This amount of transport detail exceeds 

practical limits in the MSM. In practice, the Coal Transportation Costs module applies three procedures to reduce 

the number of transport rates and routes available to the 

MSM: 

1. A procedure for mixed freight rail and unit train rates 

applies two screens to eliminate rates. The first screen 

eliminates the unit train option fo.. any origindestination pair where the destination's coal demand is 

less than 500,000 tons annually. Unit t-ain cost economies and low rates are achieved if the dedicated rail 

equipment is utilized at almost full capacity and if 

individual train sizes and the tonnage h<~uled are large 

enough to achieve low fixed-rail system costs (in terms 

of costs per ton of coal hauled). A lower limit of 

500,000 tons per year is in line with cost-effective 

capacities for unit trains. The second screen examines 

unit train and regular freight rail rates k .. every origin/ 

52 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
destination pair, the rate matrix retains the one with the 

lower rate. Since the MSM minimizes costs and since 

no other constraints are limiting the choice between 

regular rail and unit train modes, the higher costing 

option would never be chosen. Consequently, that 

option can be eliminated without affecting the simulated market solution. 

2. The second procedure is based on a test run of the 

model made for the years 1985-1990 using the full 

transport rate matrix. The procedure's purpose is to 

eliminate unlikely high costing origin/destination pairs. 

Rates for each mode for each supply region to each 

demand region are sorted in ascending order, highlighting the rates chosen in the test solution. A margin of 25 

percent to 50 percent over the highest rate chosen in the 

solution is used as a cutoff to eliminate irrelevant rates 

from the final rate matrix. For low-sulfur western coal 

supply regions where demand is expected to increase 

relatively rapidly, margins near 50 percent are used to 

determine the cutoffs. In supply regions where production is not expected to grow rapidly, such as in the 

high-sulfur Midwest coal fields, margins closer to 25 

percent are used to determine the cutoffs. 

3. The mechanical-type elimination in procedure 2 was 

judged to be potentially too constraining for certain 

supply regions. Two classes of "problem" supply 

regions were identified by examining preliminary 

DCAM solutions. The first class is the group of supply 

regions that serve large regional markets. Examples are 

supply regions 8, 9, and 21 (low-sulfur coal fields in 

Virginia, Kentucky, and West Virginia), which ship 

coal to a large number of demand regions east of the 

Mississippi River, including the Northeast and F')rida. 

In the West, examples are supply regions 95 and 96 

(the Powder River basin areas of Montana and Wyoming), which provide low-sulfur coal to markets in the 

Midwest and Southwest. 

The second problem class is the group of supply 

regions that ship coal to meet metallurgic and export 

demands. Available coal for these markets is in relatively 

short supply. These two classes of supply regions figure 

prominently in the simulated market solution. The~efore, 

special attention was focused on the rate matrix for these 

regions and adjustments made, including adding back 

specific transport rates for certain origin/destination pairs 

that procedure 2 had eliminated, to avoid artificic-1 constraints to the simulated market solution. 

The final sets of coal transport rates DCAM used are 

provided in table F5 (unit train rates), table F6 (regular rail 

rates), table F7 (barge and rail/barge rates), and ta'Jle F8 

(mine mouth transmission rates). 

References 

Bernknopf, Richard L., 1985, Domestic coal distribufon: an 

interregional programming model for the U.S. coal irdustry: 

Greenwich, Conn., JAI Press, 230 p. 

Icerman, L., 1974, Relative costs of energy transmiss:0n for 

hydrology, natural gas and electricity: Energy Sources, v. 1, 

p. 444. 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1984, Low use capacity, data 

provided by H. Olson, Engineer Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, Va. 

Appendix F-Coal Transportation Costs Module 53 
APPENDIX G-COAL SUPPLY MODULE 

The Market Simulation Model (MSM) considers all 

supply possibilities available for meeting coal demands and 

chooses the set that minimizes the present value of mining, 

sulfur dioxide (SOx) scrubbing, and transportation costs. 

The Coal Supply module provides the array of coal supply 

possibilities in terms of costs and the constraints related to 

tonnages, SOx discharges, and transport capacities. The 

data the Coal Supply module determines are coefficients 

that are passed to the MSM. 

The determination of supply possibilities is different 

for each of the following five coal supply categories: 

1. coal shipped to boilers under State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) SOx regulations 

2. coal shipped to boilers under Federal new source 

performance standards (NSPS) 

3. coal shipped to boilers under Federal revised new 

source performance standards (RNSPS) 

4. coal shipped to meet metallurgic and export demands 

5. coal shipped to meet coal gasification and liquefaction 

plant (synfuel) demands 

The Coal Supply module calculates three constraint 

coefficients and one cost coefficient for input into the MSM 

Step S on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Region I 

w 

Sulfur in Coal not 

for every potential coal shipment to boil ~rs under SIP 

standards (see fig. G 1). The coefficients carry six subscripts: 

s = 1, ... ,S = the step on the regional coal tonnage-cost 

schedule 

1 = 1, ... ,I = supply region (origin) 

j = 1, ... ,J = demand region (destination) 

k = 1, ... ,K =type of demand 

1 = 1, ... ,L = transport mode 

t = 1, ... , T = year for shipment 

The sulfur in the coal consumed cannot exce~d that required 

by the demand region's SIP standard or no potential for a 

shipment exists and no coefficients are calculated. Likewise, if routes and rates for any transrort mode are 

unavailable or if a particular demand region has no SIP 

demand, there is no potential for a shipment and no 

coefficients are calculated. 

Another important constraint in the Dynamic Coal 

Allocation Model (DCAM) for coal shirments to SIP 

boilers is recognizing the existence of a larg~ fixed stock of 

boiler equipment with rigid coal requirem~nts. SIP coal 

shipments go to boilers constructed prior to 1971. Much of 

Greater than Sulfur Demand for Coal 

Allowed by SIP 

Standard 

~ 

Rail ~ (l) 

Rail/ 

~ Barge ~ 

(l) 

Trans-

~ mission 

(l) ~ 

Unit Factor (=1) 

to Tally 

Shipment Against 

Lock Capacities 

Unit Factor (=1) 

to Tally 

Shipment Against 

Transmission 

Capacity 

Constraint 

Coefficients 

-

~ 

--;;;.. 

~ 

by SIP Boilers (K) 

in Region J 

w 

Mining 

plus 

Transport 

Cost Discounted 

According 

to 

YearT 

(1985 $/ton) 

Cost 

Coefficient 

~ 

~ 

~ 

Figure G1. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet SIP demands. 

54 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

Btu 

Factor 

to 

Tally 

Shipment 

Against 

Btu 

Demand 

in 

Region 

J 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

~ 

~ 

Unit 

Factor 

to 

Tally 

Shipment 

Against 

Coal 

Tonnage 

at 

StepS 

in 

Region I 

Constraint 

Coefficient 
StepS on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Region I 

w 

SOX Discharge According Demand for Coal 

to Sulfur Content of by NSPS Boilers (K) 

Unscrubbed Coal in Region J 

t ~ 

~ 

Rail 

(L) - ~ ----3lo Sulfur ~ Unit 

Btu Factor Factor 

Unit Factor (=1) Mining Factor (Unscrubbed) 

plus to to Rail/ to Tally to 

Shipment Against Transport Tally Ta'ly 

~ Barge ~ ~ Cost ~ Tally ~ Shipment ~ Shipment 

(L) Lock Capacity Shipment Discounted Against Against Against 

According Cc.~l 

Btu NSPS 

Unit Factor (=1) to Demand sox Tonnage 

Trans- to Tally YearT Limit at 

in 

~ mission ~ Shipment Against ~ (1985 $/ton) ---3;o- ----3lo in I~ Ste"J S 

Region (l) Transmission Demand in 

J Capacity Region J Region I 

Constraint 

Coefficients 

Cost 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Figure G2. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet NSPS demands with unscrubbed coal. 

the coal is under intermediate- or long-term contract. The 

receiving boilers are designed for coal with certain characteristics that allow efficient boiler operation. In DCAM, 

these constraints on SIP coal shipments are incorporated by 

allowing only certain regions to be potential suppliers for 

SIP coal demands. 

The fixed SIP supply regions were determined as 

follows: 

1. An inventory was compiled of SIP and other-than-SIP 

boiler capacity for electric utility plants in 1985 using 

data from the U.S. Department of Energy (1986a) and 

E.H. Pechan Associates (1985). 

2. Coal shipments to electric utilities in 1985 by State and 

county of origin to specific power plants were taken 

from Federal Energy Information Administration (EIA) 

form 423 data (U.S. Department of Energy, 1986b). 

3. Most electric utility plants are equipped with SIP 

boilers; however, some power plants had mixtures of 

SIP and non-SIP boilers. SIP coal shipments to these 

plants were calculated by applying the percentage of 

SIP capacity of total capacity to the 1985 total shipments the plant received. 

4. The 1985 SIP actual supply regions are fixed in DCAM 

to be the origins for SIP coal shipments in all years. 

Thus, SIP shipments in future years to specific electric 

utility boilers (with demands adjusted for c2oacity 

utilization by the Coal Demand module-see Appendix 

I) are required to come from the same supply r~gions 

that provided coal in 1985. 

5. Industrial boilers (in specific demand regions) under 

SIP regulations are assumed to receive their coal from 

the same supply regions as specified for electric utility 

boilers (in that same demand region). For any of the 

fixed SIP supply regions, coal from any step of the 

region's coal tonnage-cost schedule can meet SIP 

demands if the sulfur content at that step do~s not 

exceed the demand region's SIP standard. 

Coal shipments to NSPS boilers are not constrained to 

any specific set of supply regions. All supply regions can be 

sources of supply as long as NSPS limits are rr:.et. In 

DCAM, NSPS regulations can be met by burning lowsulfur coal, by scrubbing coal at a high level, or by 

scrubbing coal at a low level. Accordingly, the Coal f 1.lPply 

module calculates cost and constraint coefficients for each 

of these three possible methods of meeting NSPS restrictions on SOx discharges. 

As figure G2 shows, the Coal Supply module calculates four constraint coefficients and one cost coefficient for 

every possible shipment of coal that could meet NSPS 

boiler demands. Since coal blending is allowed, there are 

Appendix G-Coal Supply Module 55 
StepS on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Region I 

~ SOX Scrubbing at 70% 

Demand for Coal or Greater Up to 

0.61bs of SOX by NSPS Boilers (K) 

per Million Btu in Region J 

t w 

~ 

Rail ...., 

(L) ..- --? -?- Sulfur ~ Unit 

Btu Factor Factor 

Unit Factor (=1) Mining Factor (Scrubbed plus 70%+) to 

Rail/ to Tally Transport to to Tally 

~ Barge ~ Shipment Against ---?;> plus --? Tally ~ Tally ~-7 Shipment 

(L) Lock Capacities Scrubbing Shipment Shipment Against Against Cost Against Coal 

Unit Factor (=1) According Btu NSPS Tonnage Demand sox Trans- to Tally to at 

in Limit 

~ mission Shipment Against YearT StepS f-------7 --3>- ~ Region ~ in ~-7 (1985 $/ton) in (L) Transmission J Demand 

Capacity Region J Region I 

Constraint 

Coefficients 

Cost 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Figure G3. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet NSPS demands with coal scrubbed 70 percent or 

greater to reach 0.6 lb of SOx per million Btu heat input. 

many possibilities. Mixtures of unscrubbed and scrubbed 

coal can meet NSPS demands as long as the overall SOx 

constraint in the demand region is not violated. Therefore, 

the potential for a shipment exists at every supply step for 

which transport routes and rates are available from the coal 

supply region to the NSPS demand region. Constraint and 

cost coefficients are included for each one of the possibilities. 

There are two differences between the coefficients 

used to represent NSPS shipments and those used to 

represent SIP shipments. The first difference is related to 

the options available for meeting SOx discharge limits. The 

NSPS shipments require sulfur coefficients to tally SOx 

discharges from the coal against the demand region's 

overall SOx discharge limit. NSPS shipments can come 

from any step of the cost schedule and originate from any 

supply region as long as the SOx limits are not exceeded, 

unlike SIP shipments that are made to originate from certain 

supply regions, which satisfy SIP limits. Blending among 

steps is allowed for SIP coal shipments. But for every 

possible blend, the procedure guarantees that SIP limits will 

be met, eliminating the need for an explicit tally against the 

SIP SOx limit. Thus, the Coal Supply module does not 

calculate sulfur coefficients for SIP shipments. The second 

difference occurs in the make up of the cost coefficients. All 

SIP demands are met with shipments of ur.;;crubbed coal; 

scrubbing costs are absent from SIP cost coefficients. NSPS 

demands that require the low- or high-scrubt'~ng options are 

met with scrubbed coal, and an appropriate scrubbing cost 

is included by the Coal Supply module in the cost coefficient. 

Figures 03 and 04 show the kinds of constraint and 

cost coefficients made available for meeting NSPS demands 

with scrubbed coal. Figure 03 shows coeffic:~nts calculated 

for the low-scrubbing option (70 percent or greater removal 

efficiency up to 0.6 lb of SOx per million Btu heat input). 

Scrubbing costs are included in the cost coefficients. Sulfur 

factors are set to meet the NSPS SOx discharge limit. 

Similarly, figure 04 shows coefficients calculated for the 

high-scrubbing option (90 percent SOx rem'1val efficiency 

level). Like the unscrubbed NSPS shbment option, 

scrubbed coal shipments are allowed from any supply 

region for which transport routes and rates are available to 

demand regions with NSPS boilers. 

The RNSPS-regulated coal shipmentf are subject to 

technical scrubbing requirements. As figure 05 indicates, 

the lower costing scrubbing option (from 70 to 90 percent 

scrubbing, or 90 percent scrubbing) is idertified for each 

56 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
StepS on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Region I 

w 

SOX Scrubbing at Demand for Coal 

90% Removal by NSPS Boilers (K) 

Efficiency Level in Region J 

t w 

~ 

Rail 

(L) -- ----::;:;. ~ Sulfur I~ Unit 

Mining (e) Btu Factor(~) Factor Unit Factor (=1) Factor (a) (Scrubbed plus 90%) to 

Rail/ to Tally to Transport (n) to Tally ~ Shipment Against Tally Barge ~ ---3:'> plus ----::;:;. ~ Tally ~ Shipment 

(L) Lock Capacities Scrubbing (b) Shipment Shipment Against Against Cost Against Coal 

Unit Factor (=1) According Btu NSPS Tonnage Demand sox Trans- to Tally to at 

in Limit 

~ mission Shipment Against YearT SteJ: S ~ ---3:'> ~ Region ~ in ~ 

(L) Transmission (1985 $/ton) Demand in 

J Capacity Region J Region I 

Constraint 

Coefficients 

Cost 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Const·aint 

Coefficient 

Figure G4. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet NSPS demands with coal scrubbed at 90 percent 

removal efficiency level. 

potential shipment to a demand region with RNSPS 

demands. Since scrubbing of at least 70 percent is mandated, cost coefficients always include a scrubbing cost. 

Coal shipped to meet metallurgic and export demands 

has special quality restrictions. Generally, coal that is 

attractive to the metallurgic and export markets has a 

low-sulfur and high-Btu content. A large amount of export 

coal goes to foreign metallurgic markets. Table G 1 provides 

sulfur and Btu quality restrictions for coal shipments to 

metallurgic and export markets. 

In the Western United States, metallurgic and export 

shipments are allowed only from supply regions 61 (Raton, 

N. Mex.), 62 (Gunnison, Colo.), 70 (Price, Utah), and 91 

(McKinley County, N. Mex.). Also, coal can be utilized 

only from steps on the regional coal tonnage-cost schedule 

with sulfur content less than or equal to 1. 8 percent sulfur 

by weight. Shipments from Eastern U.S. supply regions are 

required to have at least 13,000 Btu/lb and no more than 1.8 

percent sulfur by weight. After the year 2030, it is assumed 

that resource depletion (in the United States and abroad) 

will allow some relaxation in coal quality for metallurgic 

and export markets. Accordingly, the level for Eastern U.S. 

and Western U.S. sulfur content is raised from 1. 8 percent 

to 2.0 percent, and the Btu level for shipments from Eastern 

U.S. supply regions is relaxed to 12,000 Btu/lb. 

Figure G6 outlines constraint and cost coefficierts the 

Coal Supply module made available to the MS~1 for 

meeting metallurgic and export demands. Transport options 

include only rail and rail/barge; electric transmission is not 

feasible for coal going to metallurgic and export ma~kets. 

Cost coefficients exclude scrubbing because, ordinarily, 

metallurgic coal is not scrubbed. In the case of ex'Jorts, 

boiler coal made available for export is required to be of 

high quality. It is unlikely that low-sulfur export coal, 

scrubbed at the foreign demand center, could be cost 

competitive in export markets. 

Coal shipped to meet synfuel demands is the fifth and 

final category of coal shipments. This type of coal has very 

few limits on supply possibilities. Figure G7 shows the 

constraint and cost coefficients the Coal Supply module 

made available to meet synfuel demands. Electric trarsmission is not feasible for synfuel demands. There are no coal 

quality restrictions related to sulfur or Btu content sin~e the 

coal would be treated in chemical conversion processes 

where waste streams and conditions can be tightly controlled. 

Appendix G-Coal Supply Module 57 
StepS on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Reg10n I 

t 

Coal Scrubbed at 70% or 

Greater to Meet 0.6% lbs 

per Million Btu or at 90% 

Whichever has Lower Cost 

w 

~ 

Rail 

(L) 

Rail/ 

~ Barge 

(L) 

Trans-

~ mission 

(L) 

~ 

~ 

Unit Factor (=1) 

to Tally 

Shipment Against 

Lock Capacities 

Unit Factor (=1) 

to Tally 

Shipment Against 

Transmission 

Capacity 

Constraint 

Coefficients 

Demand for Coal 

by RNSPS Boilers (K) 

..... 

.... 

-----33-

~ 

in Region J 

w 

Mining 

plus 

Transport 

Plus Scrubbing 

Cost Discounted 

According 

to 

YearT 

(1985 $/ton) 

Cost 

Coefficient 

~ 

~ 

~ 

Btu 

Factor 

to 

Tally 

Shipment 

Against 

Btu 

Demand 

in 

Region 

J 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Figure G5. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet RNSPS demands. 

58 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

~ 

~ 

Unit 

Factor 

to 

Tally 

Shipment 

Against 

Coal 

Tonnage 

at 

StepS 

in 

Region I 

Constraint 

Coefficient 
StepS on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Region I 

w 

Sulfur No Greater than 1.8% (to 2030) 

2.0% (after 2030). Btu Content 

~ 

~ 

(Eastern U.S.) No Less than 

13,000 btu/lb (to 2030) 

12,000 btu/lb (after 2030) 

w 

Rail 

(L) 

Rail/ 

Barge 

(L) ~ 

Unit Factor (=1) 

to Tally 

Shipment Against 

Lock Capacities 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

' 

--

~ 

Demand for 

Export and 

Metallurgical Coal 

in Region J 

.'W 

Mining 

plus 

Transport 

Cost 

Discounted 

According 

to 

YearT 

(1985 $/ton) 

Cost 

Coefficient 

~ 

~ 

~ 

Btu 

Factor 

to 

Tally 

Shipment 

Against 

Btu 

Demand 

in 

Region 

J 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

~ 

~ 

Unit 

Far.tor 

t':l 

Tally 

Ship'llent 

Agc;nst 

Coal 

Tonnage 

at 

Ste:r> S 

in 

Region I 

Constraint 

Coetncient 

Figure G6. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet demands for export and metallurgic coa1• 

Step S on Regional 

Coal Tonnage-Cost 

Schedule in Region I 

f 

Rail ~ (L) 

Rail/ 

~ Barge 

(L) ~ 

Unit Factor (=1) 

to Tally 

Shipment Against 

Lock Capacities 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

.... 

~ 

Demand for Coal 

by Synfuel Plants (K) 

in Region J 

w 

Mining 

plus 

Transport 

Cost 

Discounted 

According 

to 

YearT 

(1985 $/ton) 

Cost 

Coefficient 

----33-

~ 

~ 

Btu 

Factor 

to 

Tally 

Shipment 

Against 

Btu 

Demand 

in 

Region 

J 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

~ 

~ 

Unit 

Fa~~tor 

to 

Tally 

Shit=ment 

Against 

Coal 

Tonnage 

at 

StepS 

in 

Rerion 1 

Constraint 

Coefficient 

Figure G7. Constraint and cost coefficients, coal shipments to meet synfuel plant demands. 

Appendix G -Coal Supply Mo..-~de 59 
Figures G 1 through G7 have outlined the coefficient 

sets the Coal Supply module provided. These various cost 

and constraint coefficients are used in the objective function 

and constraint inequalities in the MSM (as formulated in 

table Al). The study uses the coefficients identified in 

figure G4 (coal supply possibilities for meeting NSPS 

demand with a high level of scrubbing) to illustrate the 

linkage between the Coal Supply module and the MSM as 

follows: 

In Figure G4 

Mining cost per ton 

Transportation cost per ton 

Scrubbing cost per ton 

Btu factor for demand 

constraint 

Sulfur factor for SOx discharge 

limit 

Unit factor for supply 

Unit factor for river locks 

Unit factor for electric transmission constraint 

In Table A1 

emi in Objective Function 

nijl in Objective Function 

bmik in Objective Function 

cxi in Other Demand constraint 

13mik in constraint for SOx 

Discharge NSPS 

Demands 

1 in Supply constraint 

1 in River Locks constraint 

1 in Electric Transmission 

constraint 

If the MSM chooses a particular shipment (x.7lijklt) to enter 

the solution to meet an NSPS demand, the shipment will be 

tallied against the objective function and the various constraints according to the coefficients the Coal Supply 

module provides. Similar linkage holds for coal supply 

possibilities when meeting the other categorie~ of demand. 

References 

E.H. Pechan Associates, 1985, Final S02 emission limits by 

State, plant, and unit (prepared for the U.S. Department of 

Energy), 195 p. 

U.S. Department of Energy, l986a, Energy Information Administration, Electric generating plant file, data rrovided by A. 

Breuel: Washington, D.C. 

---1986b, Energy Information Administration, Cost and quality of fuels for electric utility plants 1985: Washington, 

D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 21: p. 

60 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
APPENDIX H-SOx DISCHARGE LIMITS 

MODULE 

The Dynamic Coal Allocation Model (DCAM) 

includes restrictions for sulfur dioxide (SOx) discharges 

from coal combustion that the Federal Clean Air Act 

mandated. DCAM's modular design easily incorporates a 

variety of existing and proposed environmental policy 

restrictions. The SOx Discharge Limits module calculates 

regional limits for meeting State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

standards and for meeting new source performance standards (NSPS). As Appendix G discussed, revised new source 

performance standards (RNSPS) mandate scrubbing technology; the technology requirement itself is the constraint. 

The Coal Supply module's calculations of cost and constraint coefficients provide all the data needed to represent 

RNSPS limits in DCAM. 

SIP regulations are targeted at emissions from coal 

combusted in electric utility boilers with construction startup dates prior to August 1971 and to large industrial boilers 

(annual heat input greater than 25,000 tons of coal containing 24 million Btu/ton) on-line before 1985. SIP standards 

also apply to all small industrial boilers (annual heat input 

not more than 25,000 tons of coal containing 24 million 

Btu/ton). These boilers are required to meet standards 

established through State Implementation Plans, which 

were designed to achieve national ambient air quality 

standards for sulfur dioxide. SIP standards are applied to 

specific boilers; the standards vary by region according to 

boiler location. The Coal Demand module (see Appendix I) 

groups coal shipments to SIP boilers according to specific 

pairs of DCAM supply and demand regions for the SIP 

boiler category because each shipment has a boiler-specific 

SIP discharge standard (in units of allowable lbs of SOx 

discharge per million Btu). Boiler-specific SIP standards for 

electric utility boilers are taken from E.H. Pechan Associates ( 1985). The SIP standard is applied at the demand 

center where the coal is utilized. To obtain an aggregate SIP 

standard, the boiler SIP standards are weight averaged by 

the tonnage required to be shipped from specific supply 

regions. Individual boiler SIP standards stay constant but 

weight-averaged aggregated SIP standards change over time 

because a boiler's age decreases its capacity utilization (as 

described in the Coal Demand module, Appeniix I). 

Consequently, coal demands for individual boilerf. (for a 

specific pair of DCAM supply and demand regio"'~s) can 

change at different rates. These rates, applied to fixed boiler 

SIP standards, provide the different SIP standards by year 

as shown in table H 1. Coal can come from any ster on the 

regional coal tonnage-cost schedule for any supply-demand 

region pair, as long as the indicated SIP standarc is not 

exceeded. 

The data in table H1 (middle year in each time period) 

indicate that SIP standards were in effect in the year 1985 

for shipments to many demand regions. In 1985, coal 

shipments to SIP boilers constituted about 48 percent of 

total coal demands. However, by 2025, almost all electric 

utility SIP boilers will be retired. Most of the remairing SIP 

standards shown in table H1 for the year 2025 apply to 

industrial boiler coal demands. 

The SOx Discharge Limits module also totals regional 

limits for coal burned in NSPS boilers. NSPS discharge 

limits by DCAM demand region are calculated b~' multiplying the discharge standard by the NSPS boiler demand 

for coal (in millions of Btu's). Table H2 shows the total 

restrictions on SOx discharges for selected yea~s. The 

Market Simulation Model (MSM) explicitly constrains the 

NSPS SOx discharge limits. 

As explained previously, the MSM's cho~~es for 

meeting the NSPS discharge constraints include burning 

unscrubbed coal, coal scrubbed at the 70 percent efficiency 

level or up to 0.6 lb of SOx per million Btu, or coal 

scrubbed at a 90 percent scrubber removal efficiency level. 

The MSM may choose several of these options tc meet a 

specific regional demand. The tonnages (for the selected 

options) are multiplied by appropriate sulfur factors (sulfur 

content adjusted for SOx scrubbing) and the results added to 

obtain the demand center's total SOx discharge. The total 

discharge cannot exceed the limits shown in table H2. 

Reference 

E.H. Pechan Associates, 1985, Final S02 emission limits by 

State, plant, and unit (prepared for the U.S. Depa1:ment of 

Energy), 195 p. 

Appendix H-SOx Discharge Limits Module 61 
APPENDIX I-COAL DEMAND MODULE 

Various methods are used to forecast the several 

categories of coal demand from 1985 to 2065. The opportunity cost analysis for the base, restricted, and unsuitability 

cases for 1985 (unsuitability criteria restrictions lifted in 

1985) require coal demand projections for 1985 to 2030. 

The other resource policy cases this report examined require 

demand projections for 1985 to 2065, depending on the 

policy scenario (recall fig. C3). This appendix first discusses the methods used to project coal demands for 1985 to 

2030. Data and existing forecasts allow a rich development 

of these projections. The second part of this appendix 

discusses methods for projections beyond 2030. Those 

projections, with one exception, are extrapolations of earlier demands. The one exception is the projection of synfuel 

plant coal demand, which is based on an analytic model. 

Coal demand projections are made at the geographic 

level of EPA's air quality control regions (AQCR's) (U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1972). By combining 

194 AQCR's as separate demand markets (shown in table 

I3) with 60 supply regions, the Dynamic Coal Allocation 

Model (DCAM) maintains a high level of regional detail. 

This is an important modeling feature. The U.S. coal supply 

is highly heterogeneous with respect to location, mining 

cost, and coal quality. U.S. coal demands, also, are 

heterogeneous in terms of location, coal quality constraints, 

and size. 

Coal Demand Projections, 1985-2030 

There are four demand categories for which the Coal 

Demand module makes projections for 1985-2030: 

1. electrical utility boiler demands 

2. industrial boiler demands 

3. export demands 

4. metallurgic demands 

Federal and State sulfur dioxide (SOx) regulations 

place constraints on coal quality and require a certain level 

of SOx scrubbing. Consequently, electric utility and industrial boiler demand projections must be broken out according to SOx regulations to link with the Coal Supply 

module's coefficients. Similarly, export and metallurgic 

coal demand projections need a link to the Coal Supply 

module's cost and constraint coefficients. Figure Il shows 

the specific demand categories and the linkage with the 

Coal Supply module. As figure 11 shows, eight demand 

categories require the Coal Demand module forecasts. 

However, because specific demand projection methods are 

applied to more than one coal demand category, the eight 

categories in figure 11 can be collapsed (for presentation 

purposes) into the following four categories: 

1. State Implementation Plan (SIP) electric utility boiler 

demands 

2. Federal new source performance standards and revised 

new source performance standards (NSPf and RNSPS) 

electric utility boiler demands 

3. SIP and NSPS industrial boiler demands 

4. metallurgic and export coal demands 

Each projection method is discussed below. Demand 

forecasts for each category are presented later in the 

appendix. 

SIP Electric Utility Boiler Demands 

Electric utility coal demands under SIP regulations 

are projected on a boiler or plant basis. I 'liler-specific 

demands are aggregated regionally for sp~cific supply 

origins. The supply origins and demand destinations pattern 

replicates the actual 1985 shipping patterns. 

Figure 12 outlines the specific steps the Coal Demand 

module uses to project SIP electric utility c''>al demands. 

The procedure starts with a 1985 inventory of electric utility 

units. Each unit or boiler is identified b;r geographic 

location, plant code, generating capacity, on-line year, 

applicable SOx regulation (SIP, NSPS, or RNf"PS), and SIP 

limit, when appropriate (U.S. Department of Energy, 

1986a, and E.H. Pechan Associates, 1985). U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) form 423 provides data on 1985 coal 

deliveries to electric power plants by State-c')unty origins 

(U.S. Department of Energy, 1986b). Boiler coal receipts 

are determined by allocating total plant coal delivery using 

each boiler's share of 1985 plant capacity. Bo'ler and plant 

capacities are calculated using a capacity utilization schedule (table 11), while form 423 provides the l")iler on-line 

year data. 

Boiler coal requirements are forecast by applying a 

time-related boiler capacity factor to the 19f:~ deliveries. 

The boiler capacity factor is the projected boiler utilization 

rate for any year after 1985 divided by the 19"5 utilization 

rate (the capacity utilization schedule in table 11 having 

determined both rates). The boiler-specific demands are 

then aggregated to obtain SIP electric utility demands for 

specific supply-origin demand-destination pairs. The projected demands for individual boilers are tied. to the 1985 

State-county supply origins. Consequently, the aggregation 

maintains coal quality constraints for shipments as required 

for the old SIP boilers. As figure 12 indicates, t;e projection 

procedure also adjusts aggregate SIP boiler limits according 

to the projected boiler coal demands to update the SIP SOx 

limits (as discussed in Appendix H). 

NSPS and RNSPS Electric Utility Boiler Deman~" 

The forecasting procedure for electric utility coal 

demands for NSPS and RNSPS boilers relies on certain 

control totals available from DOE forecast:~ (discussed 

below). Once the control totals are achieved, the Coal 

62 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
COAL SUPPLY MODULE COAL DEMAND MODULE 

~ 

Coal Demands by Electric Utility 

Boilers Under SIP Regulations 

Supply Options for Coal 

Shipped to SIP Boilers 

(Figure G1) r-----__ Coal Demands by Industrial 

Boilers Under SIP Regulations 

Coal Demands by Electric Utility 

~ Boilers Under NSPS Regulations 

Supply Options for Coal 

Shipped to NSPS Boilers 

(Figures G2 through G4) r-----__ Coal Demands by Industrial 

Boilers Under NSPS Regulations 

Supply Options for Coal I 

Shipped to RNSPS Boilers Coal Demands by Electric Utility 

(Figure G5) Boilers Under RNSPS Regulations 

Supply Options for Meeting Demands for Metallurgical Metallurgical Demands Coal 

(Figure G6) 

Supply Options for Meeting Demands for Export Export Demands 

(Figure G6) Coal 

Supply Options for Meeting Demands by Synfuel Demands Synfuel Plants (Figure G7) 

Figure 11. Categories of coal demands projected by the Coal Demand module. 

Demand module uses regional shares to forecast NSPS and with DOE's National Energy Plan 5 (NEP5) forecasts. 

RNSPS coal demands at the AQCR level. The Coal Demand module aggregates SIP coal demands 

Projections of electric utility coal demands for NSPS to the Federal region level to meet this constraint. The 

and RNSPS boilers are constrained in the Coal Demand SIP Federal region total is subtracted from th~ overall 

module as follows: Federal region total to obtain a Federal region control 

• At the Federal region (see table 12) reporting level, total total for the combined NSPS and RNSPS coal demands. 

utility coal demand (SIP plus NSPS plus RNSPS) is • Separate NSPS and RNSPS national coal demand estirequired to meet Federal region demand forecasts pre- mates are developed from the NEP5 forecasts through a 

pared by Argonne National Laboratory for the U.S. balancing procedure that employs regional shares (Mitre 

DOE (Argonne National Laboratory, 1986) consistent Corporation, 1980). Total demand for these two cateAppendix 1-Coal Demand Module 63 
1985 Coal Shipments 

From State-County 

Origins to Specific Electric 

Utility Plants 

1985 SIP Boiler Demand 

Projected SIP Boiler 

Demand for Coal from 

State-County Origins 

I 

--

Aggregated SIP Boiler 

Coal Deliveries by 

Demand and Supply Region 

--

Boiler Start-Up 

or On-Line Year 

Electric Utility Plant 

Deliveries Prorated to 

SIP Boiler According to Boiler 

Share of 1985 Plant Capacity 

Projected SIP 

Boiler Capacity 

(Relative to 1985) 

SIP SOX Limit by 

Demand and Supply Region 

-

-

Figure 12. Procedure for projecting SIP electric utility coal demands. 

gories is constrained to a reasonable limit because ( 1) 

the separate demands in each Federal region must total 

the Federal region control total (determined by the first 

procedure, above) and (2) the totals of all Federal 

regions (separately, in the NSPS and RNSPS categories) must equal DOE's NEP5 national control totals. 

DCAM coal demands are required at the regional 

level (AQCR's). DOE has developed county-level allocations of electric utility fuel requirements according to SOx 

control standards (Mitre Corporation, 1980, and Cowan, 

1979). The allocations are based on the following inputs: 

• An announced list of plants scheduled for construction 

through 1990, as reported by utility companies. 

• A rank -ordered list of potential sites for coal-fired 

power plants. 

The allocation procedure projects electric generation, by 

county, for NSPS and RNSPS plants in 1985, 1990, and 

2000. These county allocations are added to obtain AQCR 

shares that are applied against the Federal region projections 

to obtain electric utility NSPS and RNSPS coal demands at 

the AQCR level. 

Federal region and national control totals are developed from DOE projections available through 2030 (data 

provided by T. Williams at the U.S. Department of Energy 

and by Argonne National Laboratory (19fiJ)). Consequently, the Federal region control totals and the separate 

Federal region projections for NSPS and RNSPS demand 

provide demand estimates (at the Federal regio'lallevel) for 

each year in the forecast to 2030. However, t'le allocation 

from Federal region to AQCR level is only year specific to 

the year 2000. After 2000, the Federal-regicn-to-AQCRallocation for 2000 is applied. Using constart. allocations 

keeps AQCR shares within Federal regions con<:>tant. On the 

other hand, the AQCR projection levels can ch"nge according to the projected Federal region demands. Since the latter 

are based on plant inventories, additions, and retirements 

(Argonne National Laboratory, 1986), the AQCR projections maintain a large degree of regional int~grity in all 

years. 

SIP and NSPS Industrial Boiler Demands 

The demand forecasts for industrial bo:ler coal are 

projected using methods similar to those for dectric utilities. The procedure relies on certain control totals and 

regional shares available from DOE studies. 

64 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Industrial coal demand projections are constrained by 

the Coal Demand module, as follows: 

• At the Federal region level, total industrial boiler 

demand (SIP plus NSPS) is required to meet Federal 

region demand forecasts (from Argonne National Laboratory, 1986). The Argonne forecasts are consistent 

with the DOE's NEP5 national forecasts. The Coal 

Demand module uses procedures described in the next 

subsection, Metallurgic and Export Coal Demands, to 

project metallurgic coal demands. These metallurgic 

demands (at the Federal region level) are subtracted 

from Argonne Federal region totals (which include 

metallurgic and industrial boiler demands). This procedure provides Federal region control totals for the 

combined SIP and NSPS industrial boiler demands. 

• The combined SIP and NSPS demands are split into 

separate estimates at the Federal region level. To do 

this, the Coal Demand module uses separate SIP and 

NSPS national control totals developed from DOE's 

NEP5 national forecast. A balancing procedure, similar 

to that used for the electric utility allocations, provides 

SIP and NSPS demand projections at the Federal region 

level. 

Industrial coal demands are required at the regional 

level of AQCR's. DOE has developed a procedure to 

allocate industrial coal demands to the county level (Mitre, 

1980, and Cowan, 1979). The allocations are based on the 

age, size, and location of boilers, as well as the SOx 

regulations for industrial boilers. Data used by the allocation procedure include: 

• Base-year and projected level of industrial activity by 

State as forecast by OBERS (Office of Business and 

Economic Research) (U.S. Water Resources Council, 

1974). 

• Size, age, and location of existing large facilities from 

the Major Fuel Burning Installation File (Federal 

Energy Administration, 1974). 

Electrical utility and industrial 

The procedure's county allocations are a~ded to 

obtain AQCR shares that, in tum, are applied against the 

Federal region projections to obtain industrial coal d ~mands 

at the AQCR level. Data are available to project sh"res for 

1985 to 2000. 

In the industrial category, regional shares are extrapolated by applying the AQCR shares for 2000 and r n years 

after 2000. But because distinct Federal region projections 

are made to the year 2030, the AQCR industr~al coal 

demand projections do reflect region-specific variation over 

all years. 

Metallurgic and Export Coal Demands 

National projections of U.S. coal exports and metallurgic coal demands are taken from DOE studie~ (U.S. 

Department of Energy, 1985, 1986c). The demand destination for coal exports is the U.S. shipping port. Assignment 

to AQCR' s (as DCAM requires) is made using shares 

developed from 1985 data (U.S. Department of Energy, 

1986d) for exports and U.S. Department of Energy (1986e) 

for metallurgic coal. The 1985 shares are used tc project 

AQCR in all years. Using a constant share procedu .. e to the 

year 2000 is a reasonable approach. Shipping p0rts and 

coking facilities are limited in number and fixed in the short 

run. Beyond 2000, the procedure is less reliable but no 

better data are available for projecting regional allocations. 

Coal Demand Projections, 2030-2065 

Coal demand projections for 2030 to 2165 are 

required for analyzing long-term land-use policies related to 

relaxing or extending Bureau of Land Management's 

(BLM's) unsuitability criteria restrictions. The p'"ojection 

methodology is designed in accordance with basi~ principles; only the most direct procedures are warran+l!d. The 

Coal Demand module performs two tasks to fore~ast coal 

demands for 2030 to 2065. The first task is to extrapolate 

the coal demand projections developed for 1985 tc 2030 to 

the years 2045, 2060, and 2075, as follows: 

SIP NSPS Electrical utility RNSPS Total 

Year coal coal coal Export coal Metallurgic coal coal 

1985 437 212 37 101 40 827 

1990 400 262 147 96 40 945 

1995 327 273 322 104 37 1063 

2000 252 283 506 108 41 1190 

2005 185 296 727 138 46 1392 

2010 125 310 922 146 48 1551 

2015 87 287 1064 154 51 1643 

2020 50 269 1233 163 54 1769 

2025 19 244 1420 172 57 1912 

2030 230 1563 180 60 2033 

2045 0 220 1778 180 60 2238 

2060 0 220 1881 180 60 2341 

2075 0 220 1933 180 60 2393 

(Estimates are in millions of tons of coal containing 24 million Btu per ton.) 

Appendix 1-Coal Demand Mm',de 65 
For this analysis, the extrapolations are based on the 

following assumptions or conditions: 

• Export and metallurgic demands remain constant at 

their 2030 levels. 

• All SIP boilers (assuming a 50-year life) are retired by 

2030. Therefore, SIP demands extrapolated beyond 

2030 are set at zero. 

• As the DOE studies project, utilization for NSPS boilers 

peaks in 2010 after a steady build-up of industrial and 

electric utility boiler capacity. By 2035, almost all 

electric utility NSPS boilers are retired, assuming that 

1985 is the latest on-line year and that boilers have a 

50-year life. After 2035, industrial boilers account for 

all of the NSPS coal demand. Coal utilization is 

assumed to remain about constant as the industrial 

boiler stock is replaced. 

• The extrapolation of RNSPS coal demands is based on 

the assumption that the coal-fired electric utility industry reaches constant production. Events consistent with 

this assumption include improvements in generating 

efficiency, a slow demand growth stemming from a low 

population growth, greater reliance on nucleargenerated power, and sufficient time for coal-fired 

generating capital stocks to fully depreciate. Demand is 

allowed to increase at diminishing rates so that there is 

a smooth transition by the 2060-2075 period to a 

condition of near-zero growth. Because demand categories other than RNSPS coal exhibit constant demands 

in the extrapolation period, total coal use (across all the 

conventional uses shown above) also reaches near-zero 

growth by 2075. 

The second task is to forecast synfuel plant demands 

for coal. For this analysis, the synfuel coal demands are 

based on several assumptions and conditions. 

Year 

1985 

2000 

2030 

2045 

2060 

2075 

Total 

Total transportation nonconventional 

liquid demand liquids 

(1015 Btu) (1015 Btu) 

20 (Actual) 0 

21 0 

25 0 

28 10 

30 20 

33 33 

(For the last column, a conversion efficiency of 70 percent is assumed.) 

• The demand for liquid hydrocarbon fuel~ for transportation will grow modestly. Liquid demand in 1985 was 

20x 1015 Btu (U.S. Department of Energ:r, 1987a). By 

2075, this demand will reach a level of a')out 33X 1015 

Btu. The projected liquid demands assune continuedimprovements in automobile gas mileage, some use of 

electrical transportation, slow growth in automobile 

stocks, and some growth in the use of li<'mid fuels for 

truck and air transportation. 

• World production of conventional hydrocarbon liquids 

will reach a maximum around the year 2030. After 

2030, conventional and nonconventional sources, 

including conversion of coal to liquids, will meet liquid 

demands. By about 2075, all conventional liquids could 

be depleted. In the period 2030-2075, nonconventional 

sources will fill the supply gap to meet demands, and 

converted coal will produce about half of the nonconventional liquids. Coal and oil shale are the main 

resources available for conversion to sy'lthetic fuels. 

Conversion costs are uncertain. A reason~ble assumption is that coal and shale will contribute equally to 

synfuel supplies. Owing to relatively high demands, 

short supplies of conventional domestic liquids, and 

large supplies of convertible resources (oil shale and 

coal), the United States could be among the first 

countries to develop a synfuels industry, starting about 

the year 2030. 

These assumptions and conditions are b<.:Jsed on analyses presented in Ridker and Watson (1980) 'nd in Ayres, 

Ridker, and Watson (1980). However, adjustments were 

made for a higher level of energy conservafon than was 

originally built into these two studies. 

Projections for nonconventionalliquid h~'drocarbons, 

based on these assumptions and conditions, are as follows: 

Liquids from Million tons of coal at 

converted coal 24 rrillion Btu 

(1015 Btu) r~r ton 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

5 297 

10 596 

16.5 983 

66 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
For use in DCAM, the projections of synfuel plant 

coal demand must be allocated to AQCR' s. The AQCR 

allocation is guided by the principles that coal conversion 

plants will be located close to water (an input required for 

conversion), close to relatively cheap coal, and close to 

pipelines for transporting the product to market; and that the 

AQCR Location 

22 Shreveport, La. 

212 Austin, Tex. 

172 Bismark, N. Dak. 

243 Rock Springs, Wyo. 

146 Grand Island, Nebr. 

14 Flagstaff, Ariz. 

154 Raton, N.Mex. 

105 Bowling Green, Ky. 

103 Huntington, W. Va. 

179 Parkersburg, W. Va. 

68 Dubuque, Iowa 

69 Davenport, Iowa 

75 Springfield, Ill. 

Applying these shares to total synfuel coal demands provides synfuel coal demand by AQCR. 

Figure I3 shows national coal demand projections. 

Total national coal demand increases by about a factor of 4, 

from 827 million tons in 1985 to 3.4 billion tons in 2075, 

along a linear path. From 1985 to 2075, the growth rate is 

1. 6 percent a year, a growth rate that is well within the 

recent experience of the U.S. coal industry (U.S. Department of Energy, 1987b). 

Coal demand projections at the AQCR level for 

selected years are provided in table I3 (1988), table 14 

(1998), table 15 (2025), and table 16 (2053). The national 

totals at the end of each of these tables are included in the 

national projections shown in figure I3. 

3000 

2500 

a: 

~ ~ 2000 

1-

z 

g 1500 ..J 

~ 

1000 

500 

EXPLANATION 

• .!!E._ 

o~!.. 

• ..!!l!!.P.!... 

O·~~P ... met ~---

X .!Y!:! •• , 

\7 .!~t!l!..-

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 

YEAR 

Figure 13. National coal demand projections. 

current pattern of liquid fuel demand locations is a good 

approximation of the future pattern. The allocations also are 

established so that the build up of synfuel production in any 

particular AQCR is not excessive. The allocation (percent 

of total output produced in indicated AQCR's) is as follows: 

2045 2060 2075 

0.17 0.083 0.076 

0 0 0.076 

0.17 0.083 0.076 

0.17 0.083 0.076 

0.17 0.087 0.076 

0 0.083 0.076 

0 0.083 0.076 

0.17 0.083 0.076 

0 0.083 0.076 

0 0.083 0.076 

0 0.083 0.076 

0.15 0.083 0.076 

0 0.083 0.088 

References 

Argonne National Laboratory, 1986, Total utility coal use by 

Federal region, 1980-2030: data provided by [ . Streets 

(prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy), Arg·:mne, Ill. 

Ayres, Robert U., Ridker, Ronald G., and Watson, William D., 

1980, Alternative future scenarios for the SPS comparative 

assessment (prepared for Argonne National Lal'')ratory), 

118 p. 

Cowan, P.J., 1979, The role of models in energy and environmental policymaking: a case study of the strategic environmental assessment system: U. of Pennsylvania M.S. thesis, 

146 p. 

E.H. Pechan Associates, 1985, Final S02 emission limits by 

State, plant, and unit (prepared for the U.S. Deprrtment of 

Energy), 195 p. 

Federal Energy Administration, 1974, Major fuel burning installation data base: Washington, D.C. 

Mitre Corporation, 1980, Introduction to the strategic environmental assessment system (prepared for the U.~. Department of Energy): McLean, Va., 65 p . 

Ridker, Ronald G., and Watson, William D., 1980, To choose a 

future, resource and environmental consequence0 of alternative growth paths: Baltimore, Md., Johns Hopkins University Press, for Resources for the Future, 463 p. 

U.S. Department of Energy, 1985, Energy Information Administration, Annual energy outlook 1984: Washingt')n, D.C., 

U.S. Government Printing Office, DOE/EIA-0383(84), 

354 p. 

---1986a, Energy Information Administration, Electric generating plant file, data provided by A. Breuel: Washington, 

D.C. 

---1986b, Energy Information Administration, Cost and quality of fuels for electric utility plants 1985: Washington, 

D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 212 p. 

---1986c, Energy Information Administration, Anrual energy 

outlook 1985: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, DOE/EIA-0383(85), 99 p. 

---1986d, Energy Information Administration, Quarterly coal 

report: Washington, D.C., U.S. Governmert Printing 

Office, DOE/EIA-0121(85/4Q), table 12, p. 26. 

Appendix 1-Coal Demand Mo~ule 67 
---1986e, Energy Information Administration. Coal distribution January-December 1985: Washington, D.C., U.S. 

Government Printing Office, DOE/EIA-0125(85/4Q), table 

7, p. 26. 

---1987a, Energy Information Administration, Annual energy 

review 1986: Washington, D.C .. U.S. Government Printing 

Office, DOE/EIA-0384(86), table 4, p. 11. 

---1987b, Energy Information Administration, Annual energy 

review 1986: Washington, D.C., U.S. Gove':llment Printing 

Office, DOEIEIA-0384(86), table 73, p. 165. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1972, Office of Air 

Programs, Federal air quality control region~: Washington, 

D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 199 p. 

U.S. Water Resources Council, 1974, 1972 OBE:-:-s projections: 

regional economic activity in U.S.: Washingt'ln, D.C., U.S. 

Government Printing Office. 

68 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Appendix Tables 

Table A1o Dynamic piecewise linear programming model of the U.S. national 

coal market 

Objective Function 

S I J K L T 

Minimize Z = I I I I I I dt(esi + nijl + bsijk)xsijk1t + 

s=l i=1 j=1 k=1 1=1 t=1 

S I J K L T 

I I I I I I 

s=1 i=1 1=1 k=1 1=1 t=1 

Constraints 

SIP Demand: ~ I Ysijlt ~ soijt 

s 1 

Other Demand: I I I aixsijklt ~ Djkt 

s i l 

SOX Discharge 

NSPS Demands: I I I Bsikxsijklt ~ sDjkt 

s i 1 

SIP Limits: 

Supply: I I I loxsijkl1 +I I I 10Ysijl1 < Rsi/3 

j k l 1 k 1 

2 I I I I 1oxsijklt + 

j k 1 t=1 

I I I I l·xsijklt +I 

j k t 1 

2 I I I I 1oysiJlt < 

1 k l t=1 

I I I 1'Ysijlt < 

- k t 

River Locks: I I I I w I I I w 1'Xsijk3t + 10 Ysij3t < 

s i j k s i 1 

Electric Transmission: 

Rs; 

V,N 

I I I 1oxsijk4t + I I 1°Ysij4t ~ E;t 

s j k s 1 

Unit Trains: 

i and j fixed 

t = 1, .. 0 ,T 

j = 1, .. 0 ,J 

k = 1, oo o ,K 

t = 1, .. o ,T 

j = 1, .. o,J 

k at index values 

for NSPS demands 

t = 1, .. o,T 

i and j fixed 

t=1,ooo,T 

s = l,ooo,s 

i = 1, .. o,I 

First time period 

t = 

s = 1, .... s 

i = 1,. oo ,I 

First two time 

periods 

s = 1, .... s 

i = 1, ... ,I 

Three or more time 

periods 

l,. .. ,T 

i 1, ... , I 

t = l, ... ,T 

Xsijk2t possibly greater than zero if Djkt ~ 500,000 per year 

Ysij2t possibly greater than zero if SOil ~ 500,000 per year 

Coal Quality, Export and Metallurgical Shipments: 

For k at index values for export and metalldurgical demands, 

xsijklt possibly greater than zero if 

Sulfurs; ~ E&M Sulfur 

Btu; ~ E&M Btu 

Non-Negative Shipments: 

Xsijklt 

Ysijlt 

> 0 

> 0 

for all s,i,j,k,l and t 

for all s,i.1.l and t 

Tables 71 
Table A2. legend for interpreting the MSM's mathematical formulation 

Indexes 

s Index for steps on mineable coal resource cost schedule in coal 

supply region i. 

S Total number of steps. 

Index for coal supply regions. 

I Total number of coal supply regions. 

j Index for coal demand regions, i.e. for each AQCR. 

J Total number of AQCR's. 

k Index for different kinds of demands: Unscrubbed coal in NSPS 

boilers, coal scrubbed at low levels in NSPS boilers, coal 

scrubbed at high levels in NSPS boilers, RNSPS coal, export coal 

and metallurgical coal. (Note: SIP coal accounted for elsewhere 

as separate demand.) 

K Total number of demand categories. 

L 

t 

T 

w 

Symbols 

dt 

Xsijklt 

Ysj_jlt 

a; 

Index for transport mode: 1 is for regular rail, 2 is for unit 

train, 3 is for barge or combination rail/barge and 4 is for 

electric transmission. 

Total number of tansport modes. 

Index for time period. 

Total number of time periods. 

Index for river lock. 

Discount factor centered at mid-point of each time period with 

real interest rate of 8%. 

Extraction cost at steps in coal supply region i (1985 $/ton). 

Transport cost from coal supply region i to coal demand region j 

via transport mode 1 (1985 $/ton). 

Scrubbing cost (1985 $/ton) for coal at step s in coal supply 

region i for demand keyion j and demand type k. (Note: bsjj~ = 0 

for unscrubbed NSPS coal, export coal and metallurgical coal.) 

Tons shipped from step s in coal supply region i to demand region 

j and demand category k via transport mode 1 in time period t. 

Tons shipped from step s in fixed coal suppy region i to fixed 

demand region j for SIP boilers via transport mode 1 in time 

period t. Underscores on i and j indicate that SIP boilers are 

required to obtain coal from certain supply regions (see 

discussion of SIP supply possibilities in appendix G, Coal Supply Module). 

SIP boiler demand (tons) required to be met in demand region j by 

shipments from a certain supply region i in time period t. 

Other boiler demand (tons of coal containing 24 million Btu per 

ton) in region j, demand category k and time period t. 

Factor in supply region i to convert tons of coal into tons of 

coal containing 24 million Btu per ton (= coal Btu/ton in supply 

region i divided by 24,000,000 Btu/ton). 

Factor at step s in coal supply region i for NSPS coal shipments 

to convert tons of coal into tons of sulfur (= sulfur fraction by weight adjusted for sulfur removal by scrubbing). 

72 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table A2. Legend for interpreting the MSM's mathematical formulationContined 

a 

Ysi 

SIP.ijt 

w 

Xsijk3t 

Sulfurs; 

E&M 

Sulfur 

Btu; 

E&M Btu 

Factor to convert tons of coal (containing 14 million Btu per ton) 

into tons of sulfur allowed to be discharged from NSPS boilers (= 

.0072, consistent with federal discharge limit of 1.2 lbs of SOX 

per million Btu). 

SOX discharge from unscrubbed coal at step s in coal supply region i (in lbs of SOX per million Btu). 

SOX SIP limit for coal shipped from a specific coal supply region i to coal demand region j in time period t (in lbs of SOX per mill ion Btu). 

Tons of coal available at step s in coal supply region i. 

Tons shipped by barge or by combination rail/barge through river 

lock w (all demands except SIP demands). 

Tons shipped by barge or by combination rail/barge through river 

lock w to satisfy SIP demands. 

Lock capacity (in tons per time period) for river lock w. 

Transmission line capacity (in tons) for coal supply region in 

time period t. 

Sulfur percentage by weight for coal at step s in coal supply region i. 

Upper bound on sulfur percentage for coal shipped to export and 

metallurgical markets. 

Btu content (Btu/lb) for coal in coal supply region i. 

Lower bound on Btu content (Btu/lb) for coal shipped to export and 

metallurgical market~-

Ta"les 73 
Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM"' 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR ANO 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL BIBB AL 1007 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL BLOUNT AL 1009 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL CULLMAN AL 1043 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL FAYETTE AL 1057 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL FRANKLIN AL 1059 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL JEFFERSON AL 1073 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL LAMAR AL 1075 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL MARION AL 1093 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL PICKENS AL 1107 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL SHELBY AL 1117 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL ST CLAIR AL 1115 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL TUSCALOOSA AL 1125 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL WALKER AL 1127 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL WINSTON AL 1133 

4 JASPER, TN CHEROKEE AL 1019 

4 JASPER, TN DE KALB AL 1049 

4 JASPER, TN ETOWAH AL 1055 

4 JASPER, TN JACKSON AL 1071 

4 JASPER, TN LAWRENCE AL 1079 

4 JASPER, TN MADISON AL 1089 

4 JASPER, TN MARSHALL AL 1095 

4 JASPER, TN MORGAN AL 1103 

4 JASPER, TN CHATTOOGA GA 13055 

4 JASPER, TN DADE GA 13083 

4 JASPER, TN WALKER GA 13295 

4 JASPER, TN BLEDSOE TN 47007 

4 JASPER, TN FRANKLIN TN 47051 

4 JASPER, TN GRUNDY TN 47061 

4 JASPER, TN HAMILTON TN 47065 

4 JASPER, TN MARION TN 47115 

4 JASPER, TN MEIGS TN 47121 

4 JASPER, TN RHEA TN 47143 

4 JASPER, TN SEQUATCHIE TN 47153 

4 JASPER, TN VAN BUREN TN 47175 

4 JASPER, TN WARREN TN 47177 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN CLINTON KY 21053 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN WAYNE KY 21231 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN ANDERSON TN 47001 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN CAMPBELL TN 47013 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN CLAIBORNE TN 47025 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN CUMBERLAND TN 47035 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN FENTRESS TN 47049 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN MORGAN TN 47129 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN OVERTON TN 47133 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN PICKETT TN 47137 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN PUTNAM TN 47141 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN ROANE TN 47145 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN SCOTT TN 47151 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN WHITE TN 47185 

8 LEBANON, VA BLAND VA 51021 

8 LEBANON, VA MONTGOMERY VA 51121 

8 LEBANON, VA PULASKI VA 51155 

8 LEBANON, VA RUSSELL VA 51167 

8 LEBANON, VA SCOTT VA 51169 

8 LEBANON, VA SMYTH VA 51173 

8 LEBANON, VA TAZEWELL VA 51185 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY BREATHITT KY 21025 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY FLOYD KY 21071 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY HARLAN KY 21095 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY KNOTT KY 21119 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY LESLIE KY 21131 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY LETCHER KY 21133 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY MARTIN KY 21159 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY PERRY KY 21193 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY PIKE KY 21195 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY BUCHANAN VA 51027 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY DICKENSON VA 51051 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY LEE VA 51105 

74 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM~Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR ANO 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY WISE VA 51195 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY BELL KY 21013 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY CLAY KY 21051 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY KNOX KY 21121 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY LAUREL KY 21125 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY MCCREARY KY 21147 

iO MIDDLESBORO, KY PULASKI KY 21199 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY WHITLEY KY 21235 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY ESTILL KY 21065 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY JACKSON KY 21109 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY LEE KY 21129 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY OWSLEY KY 21189 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY POWELL KY 21197 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY ROCKCASTLE KY 21203 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY WOLFE KY 21237 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY BOYD KY 21019 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY CARTER KY 21043 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY ELLIOTT KY 21063 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY GREENUP KY 21089 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY JOHNSON KY 21115 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY LAWRENCE KY 21127 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY MAGOFFIN KY 21153 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY MENIFEE KY 21165 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY MORGAN KY 21175 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY ROWAN KY 21205 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY LAWRENCE OH 39087 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH ATHENS OH 39009 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH FAIRFIELD OH 39045 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH GALLI A OH 39053 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH HOCKING OH 39073 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH JACKSON OH 39079 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH MEIGS OH 39105 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH MORGAN OH 39115 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH PERRY OH 39127 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH PIKE OH 39131 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH SCIOTO OH 39145 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH VINTON OH 39163 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH WASHINGTON OH 39167 

14 CADIZ, OH CARROLL OH 39019 

14 CADIZ, OH COSHOCTON OH 39031 

14 CADIZ, OH GUENSEY OH 39059 

14 CADIZ, OH HARRISON OH 39067 

14 CADIZ, OH HOLMES OH 39075 

14 CADIZ, OH KNOX OH 39083 

14 CADIZ, OH LICKING OH 39089 

14 CADIZ, OH MONROE OH 39111 

14 CADIZ, OH MUSKINGUM OH 39119 

14 CADIZ, OH NOBLE OH 39121 

14 CADIZ, OH TUSCARAWAS OH 39157 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH ASHLAND OH 39005 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH COLUMBIANA OH 39029 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH CUYAHOGA OH 39035 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH GEAUGA OH 39055 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH LAKE OH 39085 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH MAHON lNG OH 39099 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH MEDINA OH 39103 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH PORTAGE OH 39133 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH RICHLAND OH 39139 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH STARK OH 39151 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH SUMMIT OH 39153 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH TRUMBULL OH 39155 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH WAYNE OH 39169 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA BELMONT OH 39013 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA JEFFERSON OH 39081 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA ALLEGHANY PA 42003 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA BEAVER PA 42007 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA FAYETTE PA 42051 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA GREENE PA 42059 

Tab'~ 75 
Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM"':....Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIP:' 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA WASHINGTON PA 4212~ 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA WESTMORELAND PA 4212~ 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA BROOKE wv 5400~ 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA HANCOCK wv 5402=' 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA MARION wv 54049 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA MARSHALL wv 54051 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA MONONGALIA wv 54061 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA OHIO wv 5406~ 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA PRESTON wv 54077 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA WETZEL wv 54101 

17 KITTANNING, PA ARMSTRONG PA 42oo:.:. 

17 KITTANNING, PA BUTLER PA 42019 

17 KITTANNING, PA CAMBRIA PA 42021 

17 KITTANNING, PA CLARION PA 42031 

17 KITTANNING, PA CLEARFIELD PA 42033 

17 KITTANNING, PA INDIANA PA 42063 

17 KITTANNING, PA JEFFERSON PA 4206;.:. 

17 KITTANNING, PA LAWRENCE PA 42073 

18 SHARON, PA CAMERON PA 42023 

18 SHARON, PA CRAWFORD PA 42039 

18 SHARON, PA ELK PA 42047 

18 SHARON, PA FOREST PA 42053 

18 SHARON, PA MCKEAN PA 42083 

18 SHARON, PA MERCER PA 42085 

18 SHARON, PA VENANGO PA 42121 

18 SHARON, PA WARREN PA 42123 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA BRADFORD PA 42015 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA CARBON PA 42025 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA CENTRE PA 42027 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA CLINTON PA 42035 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA COLUMBIA PA 42037 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA DAUPHIN PA 42043 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA LACKAWANNA PA 42069 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA LEBANON PA 42075 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA LUZERNE PA 42079 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA LYCOMING PA 42081 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA NORTHHUMBLND PA 42097 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA POTTER PA 4210!: 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA SCHUYLKILL PA 42107 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA SULLIVAN PA 42113 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA TIOGA PA 42117 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA WAYNE PA 42121 

20 SOMERSET, PA ALLEGANY MD 24001 

20 SOMERSET, PA GARRETT MD 24022 

20 SOMERSET, PA BEDFORD PA 4200S' 

20 SOMERSET, PA BLAIR PA 42012 

20 SOMERSET, PA FULTON PA 42057 

20 SOMERSET, PA HUNTINGDON PA 42061 

20 SOMERSET, PA SOMERSET PA 42111 

20 SOMERSET, PA GRANT wv 54023 

20 SOMERSET, PA HAMPSHIRE wv 54027 

20 SOMERSET, PA HARDY wv 54031 

20 SOMERSET, PA MINERAL wv 54057 

20 SOMERSET, PA TUCKER wv 54093 

21 CHARLESTON, wv BOONE wv 54005 

21 CHARLESTON, wv CLAY wv 54015 

21 CHARLESTON, wv FAYETTE wv 54019 

21 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA wv 54039 

21 CHARLESTON, wv LINCOLN wv 54043 

21 CHARLESTON, wv LOGAN wv 54045 

21 CHARLESTON, wv MCDOWELL wv 54047 

21 CHARLESTON, wv MERCER wv 54055 

21 CHARLESTON, wv MINGO wv 54059 

21 CHARLESTON, wv NICHOLAS wv 54067 

21 CHARLESTON, wv RALEIGH wv 54081 

21 CHARLESTON, wv WAYNE wv 54099 

21 CHARLESTON, wv WYOMING wv 54109 

76 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM"'-Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv CABELL wv 54011 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv CALHOUN wv 54013 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv DODDRIDGE wv 54017 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv GILMER wv 54021 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv HARRISON wv 54033 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv JACKSON wv 54035 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv LEWIS wv 54041 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv MASON wv 54053 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv PLEASANTS wv '54073 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv PUTNAM wv 54079 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv RITCHIE wv 54085 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv ROANE wv 54087 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv TAYLOR wv 54091 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv TYLER wv 54095 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv WIIH wv 54105 

22 CLARKSBURG, WV WOOD wv 54107 

23 PHILIPPI, wv BARBOUR wv 54001 

23 PHILIPPI, wv BRAXTON wv 54007 

23 PHILIPPI, wv GREENBRIER wv 54025 

23 PHILIPPI, wv MONROE wv 54063 

23 PHILIPPI, wv PENDLETON wv 54071 

23 PHILIPPI, wv POCAHONTAS wv 54075 

23 PHILIPPI, wv RANDOLPH wv 54083 

23 PHILIPPI, wv SUMMERS wv 54089 

23 PHILIPPI, wv UPSHUR wv 54097 

23 PHILIPPI, WV WEBSTER wv 54101 

26 PEORIA, IL ADAMS IL 17001 

26 PEORIA, IL BUREAU IL 17011 

26 PEORIA, IL FULTON IL 17057 

26 PEORIA, IL HANCOCK IL 17067 

26 PEORIA, IL HENDERSON IL 17071 

26 PEORIA, IL HENRY IL 17073 

26 PEORIA, IL KNOX IL 17095 

26 PEORIA, IL LEE IL 17103 

26 PEORIA, IL MARSHALL IL 17123 

26 PEORIA, IL MCDONOUGH IL 17109 

26 PEORIA, IL MERCER IL 17131 

26 PEORIA, IL PEORIA IL 17143 

26 PEORIA, IL PUTNAM IL 17155 

26 PEORIA, IL ROCK ISLAND IL 17161 

26 PEORIA, IL SCHUYLER IL 17169 

26 PEORIA, IL STARK IL 17175 

26 PEORIA, IL WARREN IL 17187 

27 OTTAWA, IL CHAMPAIGN IL 17019 

27 OTTAWA, IL DE WITT IL 17039 

27 OTTAWA, IL FORD IL 17053 

27 OTTAWA, IL GRUNDY IL 17063 

27 OTTAWA, IL IROQUOIS IL 17075 

27 OTTAWA, IL KANKAKEE IL 17091 

27 OTTAWA, IL LA SALLE IL 17099 

27 OTTAWA, IL LIVINGSTON IL 17105 

27 OTTAWA, IL LOGAN IL 17107 

27 OTTAWA, IL MASON IL 17125 

27 OTTAWA, IL MCLEAN IL 17113 

27 OTTAWA, IL PIATT IL 17147 

27 OTTAWA, IL TAZEWELL IL 17179 

27 OTTAWA, IL WILL Il 17197 

27 OTTAWA, IL WOODFORD IL 17203 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL BROWN IL 17009 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL CALHOUN IL 17013 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL CASS Il 17017 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL CHRISTIAN IL 17021 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL EFFINGHAM IL 17049 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL FAYETTE Il 17051 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL GREENE IL 17061 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL JERSEY IL 17083 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL MACON IL 17115 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL MACOUPIN IL 17117 

Tablf'~ 77 
Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM~Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL MENARD IL 17129 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL MONTGOMERY IL 17135 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL MORGAN IL 17137 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL MOULTRIE IL 17139 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL PIKE IL 17149 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL SANGAMON IL 17167 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL SCOTT IL 17171 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL SHELBY IL 17173 

29 MT. VERNON, IL BOND IL 17005 

29 MT. VERNON, IL CLINTON IL 17027 

29 MT. VERNON, IL FRANKLIN IL 17055 

29 MT. VERNON, IL JACKSON IL 17077 

29 MT. VERNON, IL JEFFERSON IL 17081 

29 MT. VERNON, IL JOHNSON IL 17087 

29 MT. VERNON, IL MADISON IL 17119 

29 MT. VERNON, IL MARION IL 17121 

29 MT. VERNON, IL MONROE IL 17133 

29 MT. VERNON, IL PERRY IL 17145 

29 MT. VERNON, IL RANDOLPH IL 17157 

29 MT. VERNON, IL ST CLAIR IL 17163 

29 MT. VERNON, IL UNION IL 17181 

29 MT. VERNON, IL WASHINGTON IL 17189 

29 MT. VERNON, IL WILLIAMSON IL 17199 

30 TUSCOLA, IL CLARK IL 17023 

30 TUSCOLA, IL COLES IL 17029 

30 TUSCOLA, IL CUMBERLAND IL 17035 

30 TUSCOLA, IL DOUGLAS IL 17041 

30 TUSCOLA, IL EDGAR IL 17045 

30 TUSCOLA, IL VERMILION IL 17183 

30 TUSCOLA, IL BENTON IN 18007 

30 TUSCOLA, IL FOUNTAIN IN 18045 

30 TUSCOLA, IL MONTGOMERY IN 18107 

30 TUSCOLA, IL PARKE IN 18121 

30 TUSCOLA, IL VERMILLION IN 18165 

30 TUSCOLA, IL VIGO IN 18167 

30 TUSCOLA, IL WARREN IN 18171 

31 HARRISBURG, IL CLAY IL 17025 

31 HARRISBURG, IL CRAWFORD IL 17033 

31 HARRISBURG, IL EDWARDS IL 17047 

31 HARRISBURG, IL GALLATIN IL 17059 

31 HARRISBURG, IL HAMILTON IL 17065 

31 HARRISBURG, IL HARDIN IL 17069 

31 HARRISBURG, IL JASPER IL 17079 

31 HARRISBURG, IL LAWRENCE IL 17101 

31 HARRISBURG, IL POPE IL 17151 

31 HARRISBURG, IL RICHLAND IL 17159 

31 HARRISBURG, IL SALINE IL 17165 

31 HARRISBURG, IL WABASH IL 17185 

31 HARRISBURG, IL WAYNE IL 17191 

31 HARRISBURG, IL WHITE IL 17193 

32 SULLIVAN, IN CLAY IN 18021 

32 SULLIVAN, IN DAVIESS IN 18027 

32 SULLIVAN, IN GREENE IN 18055 

32 SULLIVAN, IN KNOX IN 18083 

32 SULLIVAN, IN MARTIN IN 18101 

32 SULLIVAN, IN OWEN IN 18119 

32 SULLIVAN, IN PUTNAM IN 18133 

32 SULLIVAN, IN SULLIVAN IN 18153 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY CRAWFORD IN 18025 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY DUBOIS IN 18037 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY FLOYD IN 18043 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY GIBSON IN 18051 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY HARRISON IN 18061 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY ORANGE IN 18117 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY PERRY IN 18123 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY PIKE IN 18125 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY POSEY IN 18129 

78 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM~Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY SCOTT IN 18143 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY SPENCER IN 18147 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY VANDERBURGH IN 18163 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY WARRICK IN "18173 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY WASHINGTON IN 18175 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY BRECKINRIDGE KY 21027 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY DAVIESS KY 21059 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY HANCOCK KY 21091 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY HENDERSON KY 21101 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY UNION KY 21225 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY BUTLER KY 21031 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY CALDWELL KY 21033 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY CHRISTIAN KY 21047 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY CRITTENDON KY 21055 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY EDMONSON KY 21061 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY GRAYSON KY 21085 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY HOPKINS KY 21107 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY LOGAN KY 21141 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY MCLEAN KY 21149 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY MUHLENBERG KY 21177 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY OHIO KY 21183 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY TODD KY 21219 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY WARREN KY 21227 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY WEBSTER KY 21233 

37 MARSHALL, TX BIENVILLE LA 22013 

37 MARSHALL, TX BOSSIER LA 22015 

37 MARSHALL, TX CADDO LA 22017 

37 MARSHALL, TX CLAIBORNE LA 22027 

37 MARSHALL, TX DE SOTO LA 22031 

37 MARSHALL, TX LINCOLN LA 22061 

37 MARSHALL, TX NATCHITOCHES LA 22069 

37 MARSHALL, TX RED RIVER LA 22081 

37 MARSHALL, TX SABINE LA 22085 

37 MARSHALL, TX WEBSTER LA 22119 

37 MARSHALL, TX BOWIE TX 48037 

37 MARSHALL, TX CASS TX 48067 

37 MARSHALL, TX HARRISON TX 48203 

37 MARSHALL, TX MARION TX 48315 

37 MARSHALL, TX MORRIS TX 48343 

37 MARSHALL, TX PANOLA TX 48365 

37 MARSHALL, TX SABINE TX 48403 

37 MARSHALL, TX SAN AUGUSTIN TX 48405 

37 MARSHALL, TX SHELBY TX 48419 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX ANGELINA TX 48005 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX CAMP TX 48063 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX CHEROKEE TX 48073 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX FRANKLIN TX 48159 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX GREGG TX 48183 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX HOPKINS TX 48223 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX NACOGDOCHES TX 48347 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX RAINS TX 48379 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX RUSK TX 48401 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX SMITH TX 48423 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX TITUS TX 48449 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX UPSHUR TX 48459 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX VAN ZANDT TX 48467 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX WOOD TX 48499 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX ANDERSON TX 48001 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX BRAZOS TX 48041 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX BURLESON TX 48051 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX FREESTONE TX 48161 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX GRIMES TX 48185 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX HENDERSON TX 48213 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX HOUSTON TX 48225 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX LEE TX 48287 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX LEON TX 48289 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX MADISON TX 48313 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX MILAM TX 48331 

TablE'S 79 
-1< 

Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM-Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX ROBERTSON TX 48395 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX TRINITY TX 48455 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX WALKER TX 48471 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX WASHINGTON TX 48477 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX ATASCOSA TX 48013 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX BASTROP TX 48021 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX BEXAR TX 48029 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX CALDWELL TX 48055 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX DIMMIT TX 48127 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX FAYETTE TX 48149 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX F~IO TX 48163 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX GONZALES TX 48177 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX GUADALUPE TX 48187 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX LA SALLE TX 48283 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX MAVERICK TX 48323 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX MEDINA TX 48325 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX WEBB TX 48479 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX WILSON TX 48493 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX ZAVALA TX 48507 

43 POTEAU, OK CRAWFORD AR 5033 

43 POTEAU, OK FRANKLIN AR 5047 

43 POTEAU, OK JOHNSON AR 5071 

43 POTEAU, OK LOGAN AR 5083 

43 POTEAU, OK POPE AR 5115 

43 POTEAU, OK SCOTT AR 5127 

43 POTEAU, OK SEBASTIAN AR 5131 

43 POTEAU, OK YELL AR 5149 

43 POTEAU, OK ATOKA OK 40005 

43 POTEAU, OK CARTER OK 40019 

43 POTEAU, OK COAL OK 40029 

43 POTEAU, OK HASKELL OK 40061 

43 POTEAU, OK HUGHES OK 40063 

43 POTEAU, OK JOHNSTON OK 40069 

43 POTEAU, OK LATIMER OK 40077 

43 POTEAU, OK LE FLORE OK 40079 

43 POTEAU, OK MCINTOSH OK 40091 

43 POTEAU, OK OKFUSKEE OK 40107 

43 POTEAU, OK PITTSBURG OK 40121 

43 POTEAU, OK PONTOTOC OK 40123 

43 POTEAU, OK SEMINOLE OK 40133 

43 POTEAU, OK SEQUOYAH OK 40135 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK CRAIG OK 40035 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK CREEK OK 40037 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK MAYES OK 40097 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK MUSKOGEE OK 40101 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK NOWATA OK 40105 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK OKMULGEE OK 40111 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK OSAGE OK 40113 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK PAWNEE OK 40117 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK ROGERS OK 40131 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK TULSA OK 40143 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK WAGONER OK 40145 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK WASHINGTON OK 40147 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS ALLEN KS 20001 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS BOURBON KS 20011 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS CHAUTAUQUA KS 20019 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS CHEROKEE KS 20021 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS COWLEY KS 20035 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS CRAWFORD KS 20037 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS ELK KS 20049 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS GREENWOOD KS 20073 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS LABETTE KS 20099 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS MONTGOMERY KS 20125 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS NEOSHO KS 20133 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS WILSON KS 20205 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS WOODSON KS 20207 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS BARTON MO 29011 

80 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
* Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM-Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS CEDAR MO 29039 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS DADE MO 29057 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS JASPER MO 29097 47 PITTSBURGH, KS VERNON MO 29217 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS OTTAWA OK 40115 

48 CLINTON, MO BATES MO 29013 48 CLINTON, MO BENTON MO 29015 48 CLINTON, MO CASS MO 29037 48 CLINTON, MO COOPER MO 29053 

48 CLINTON, MO HENRY MO 29083 48 CLINTON, MO JACKSON MO 29095 

48 CLINTON, MO JOHNSON MO 29101 48 CLINTON, MO LAFAYETTE MO 29107 48 CLINTON, MO PETTIS MO 29159 48 CLINTON, MO SALINE MO 29195 

48 CLINTON, MO ST CLAIR MO 29185 

49 MACON, MO ADAIR MO 29001 

49 MACON, MO AUDRAIN MO 29007 

49 MACON, MO BOONE MO 29019 

49 MACON, MO CALLAWAY MO 29027 

49 MACON, MO CHARITON MO 29041 

49 MACON, MO CLARK MO 29045 

49 MACON, MO HOWARD MO 29089 

49 MACON, MO KNOX MO 29103 

49 MACON, MO LEWIS MO 29111 

49 MACON, MO LINCOLN MO 29113 

49 MACON, MO LINN MO 29115 

49 MACON, MO MACON MO 29121 

49 MACON, MO MARION MO 29127 

49 MACON, MO MONROE MO 29137 

49 MACON, MO MONTGOMERY MO 29139 

49 MACON, MO P·IKE MO 29163 

49 MACON, MO PUTNAM MO 29171 

49 MACON, MO RALLS MO 29173 

49 MACON, MO RANDOLPH MO 29175 

49 MACON, MO SCHUYLER MO 29197 

49 MACON, MO SCOTLAND MO 29199 

49 MACON, MO SHELBY MO 29205 

49 MACON, MO ST CHARLES MO 29183 

49 MACON, MO ST LOUIS MO 29189 

49 MACON, MO SULLIVAN MO 29211 

51 MOUND CITY, KS ANDERSON KS 20003 

51 MOUND CITY, KS CHASE KS 20017 

51 MOUND CITY, KS COFFEY KS 20031 

51 MOUND CITY, KS DOUGLAS KS 20045 

51 MOUND CITY, KS FRANKLIN KS 20059 

51 MOUND CITY, KS JACKSON KS 20085 

51 MOUND CITY, KS JEFFERSON KS 20087 

51 MOUND CITY, KS JOHNSON KS 20091 

51 MOUND CITY, KS LINN KS 20107 

51 MOUND CITY, KS LYON KS 20111 

51 MOUND CITY, KS MIAMI KS 20121 

51 MOUND CITY, KS MORRIS KS 20127 

51 MOUND CITY, KS OSAGE KS 20139 

51 MOUND CITY, KS POTTAWATOMIE KS 20149 

51 MOUND CITY, KS SHAWNEE KS 20177 

51 MOUND CITY, KS WABAUNSEE KS 20197 

51 MOUND CITY, KS WYANDOTTE KS 20209 

56 ALBIA, lA APPANOOSE lA 19007 

56 ALBIA, lA DAVIS lA 19051 

56 ALBIA, lA DES MOINES lA 19057 

56 ALBIA, lA HENRY lA 19087 

56 ALBIA, lA JEFFERSON lA 19101 

56 ALBIA, lA KEOKUK lA 19107 

56 ALBIA, lA LEE lA 19111 

56 ALBIA, lA LOUISA lA 19115 

56 ALBIA, lA LUCAS lA 19117 

56 ALBIA, lA MAHASKA lA 19123 

TabiE:s 81 
-'1' 

Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM-Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUNO NOOE COUNTY 

REGION FOR ANO 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

56 ALBIA, lA MARION lA 19125 

56 ALBIA, lA MONROE lA 19135 

56 ALBIA, lA MUSCATINE lA 19139 

56 ALBIA, lA SCOTT lA 19163 

56 ALBIA, lA VAN BUREN lA 19177 

56 ALBIA, lA WAPELLO lA 19179 

56 ALBIA, lA WARREN lA 19181 

56 ALBIA, lA WASHINGTON lA 19183 

56 ALBIA, lA WAYNE lA 19185 

57 WINSLOW, AZ APACHE AZ 4001 

57 WINSLOW, AZ COCONINO AZ 4005 

57 WINSLOW, AZ NAVAJO AZ 4017 

61 RATON, NM HUERFANO co 8055 

61 RATON, NM LAS ANIMAS co 8071 

61 RATON, NM COLFAX NM 35007 

61 RATON, NM MORA NM 35033 

61 RATON, NM SAN MIGUEL NM 35047 

62 GUNNISON, co ARCHULETA co 8007 

62 GUNNISON, co DELTA co 8029 

62 GUNNISON, co DOLORES co 8033 

62 GUNNISON, co GARFIELD co 8045 

62 GUNNISON, co GUNNISON co 8051 

62 GUNNISON, co LA PLATA co 8067 

62 GUNNISON, co MESA co 8077 

62 GUNNISON, co MONTEZUMA co 8083 

62 GUNNISON, co MONTROSE co 8085 

62 GUNNISON, co OURAY co 8091 

62 GUNNISON, co PITKIN co 8097 

62 GUNNISON, co SAN JUAN co 8111 

62 GUNNISON, co SAN MIGUEL co 8113 

62 GUNNISON, co GRAND UT 49019 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co GRANO co 8049 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co RIO BLANCO co 8103 

66 RAWLINS, WY JACKSON co 8057 

66 RAWLINS, WY ALBANY WY 56001 

66 RAWLINS, WY GOSHEN WY 56015 

66 RAWLINS, WY NATRONA WY 56025 

66 RAWLINS, WY PLATTE WY 56031 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY JOHNSON WY 56019 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY SHERIDAN WY 56033 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY LINCOLN WY 56023 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY UINTA WY 56041 

70 PRICE, UT CARBON UT 49007 

70 PRICE, UT EMERY UT 49015 

70 PRICE, UT SAN JUAN UT 49037 

70 PRICE, UT SANPETE UT 49039 

70 PRICE, UT SEVIER UT 49041 

70 PRICE, UT WAYNE UT 49055 

75 FORSYTH, MT CARBON MT 30009 

75 FORSYTH, MT MUSSELSHELL MT 30065 

75 FORSYTH, MT STILLWATER MT 30095 

75 FORSYTH, MT TREASURE MT 30103 

75 FORSYTH, MT YELLOWSTONE MT 30111 

80 MINOT, NO BOTTINEAU NO 38009 

80 MINOT, NO BURKE NO 38013 

80 MINOT, NO BURLEIGH NO 38015 

80 MINOT, NO KIDDER NO 38043 

80 MINOT, NO MCHENRY NO 38049 

80 MINOT, NO MCLEAN NO 38055 

80 MINOT, NO MOUNTRAIL NO 38061 

80 MINOT, NO RENVILLE NO 38075 

80 MINOT, NO ROLETTE NO 38079 

80 MINOT, NO SHERIDAN NO 38083 

80 MINOT, NO WARD NO 38101 

80 MINOT, NO WELLS NO 38103 

87 CENTRALIA, WA COWLITZ WA 53015 

87 CENTRALIA, WA KING WA 53033 

82 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
* Table 81. Coal supply regions in DCAM-Continued 

SUPPLY OUT-BOUND NODE COUNTY 

REGION FOR AND 

NUMBER COAL SHIPMENT STATE FIPS 

87 CENTRALIA, WA KITTITAS WA 53037 

87 CENTRALIA, WA LEWIS WA 53041 

87 CENTRALIA, WA PACIFIC WA 53049 

87 CENTRALIA, WA PIERCE WA 53053 

87 CENTRALIA, WA THURSTON WA 53067 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM SAN JUAN NM 35045 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM MCKINLEY NM 35031 

92 CARBON CTY, WY CARBON WY 56007 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co MOFFATT co 8081 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY. co ROUTT co 8107 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY SWEETWATER WY 56037 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT BIG HORN MT 30003 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT CUSTER MT 30017 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT POWDER RIVER MT 30075 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT ROSEBUD MT 30087 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY CAMPBELL WY 56005 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY CONVERSE WY 56009 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY CROOK WY 56011 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY WESTON WY 56045 

97 FORT UNION, MT CARTER MT 30011 

97 FORT UNION, MT DAWSON MT 30021 

97 FORT UNION, MT FALLON MT 30025 

97 FORT UNION, MT RICHLAND MT 30083 

97 FORT UNION, MT ROOSEVELT MT 30085 

97 FORT UNION, MT SHERIDAN MT 30091 

97 FORT UNION, MT WIBAUX MT 30109 

98 FORT UNION, NO ADAMS NO 38001 

98 FORT UNION, NO BILLINGS NO 38007 

98 FORT UNION, NO BOWMAN NO 38011 

98 FORT UNION, NO DIVIDE NO 38023 

98 FORT UNION, NO DUNN NO 38025 

98 FORT UNION, NO GOLDEN VALLY NO 38033 

98 FORT UNION, NO GRANT NO 38037 

98 FORT UNION, NO HETTINGER NO 38041 

98 FORT UNION, NO MCKENZIE NO 38053 

98 FORT UNION, NO MERCER NO 38057 

98 FORT UNION, NO MORTON NO 38059 

98 FORT UNION, NO OLIVER NO 38065 

98 FORT UNION, NO SLOPE NO 38087 

98 FORT UNION, NO STARK NO 38089 

98 FORT UNION, NO WILLIAMS NO 38105 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO ADAMS co 8001 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO ARAPAHOE co 8005 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO DENVER co 8031 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO DOUGLAS co 8035 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO EL PASO co 8041 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO ELBERT co 8039 

99 DENVER BASIN, CO MORGAN co 8087 

99 DENVER BASIN, co WELD co 8123 

*INDICATES ONLY THOSE COAL SUPPLY REGIONS FOR WHICH 

COAL SUPPLY DATA WERE PROCESSED IN DCAM'S MARKET 

SIMULATION MODEL. REVIEW INDICATED THAT SOME COAL 

SUPPLY REGIONS CONTAIN MAINLY HIGH COST LOW 

QUALITY RESOURCES. THESE COAL SUPPLY REGIONS WERE 

NOT CARRIED FORWARD FOR ANALYSIS IN THE MARKET 

SIMULATION MODEL. THE AMOUNT OF COAL TONNAGE 

IN THE DROPPED COAL SUPPLY REGIONS IS SHOWN 

IN TABLE B4. 

Tablrs 83 
Table 82. Minable coal resource base, by State-no land-use restrictions (million 

short tons) 

State 

Alabamad 

Arizona 

Arkansas 

Colorado 

Georgia 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Kentucky, East 

Kentucky, West 

Maryland 

Michigan 

Missouri 

Montanad 

New Mexicod 

North Carolina 

North Dakotad 

Ohio 

Oklahoma 

Oregon 

Pennsylvania 

South Dakota 

Tennessee 

Texas 

Utah 

Virginia 

Washington 

West Virginia 

Wyomingd 

Total 

(l) 

Underground 

13014 

102 

273 

12234 

2 

63286 

8924 

1733 

0 

8199 

16820 

695 

123 

1479 

70959 

2127 

11 

0 

12945 

1238 

15 

28296 

0 

609 

0 

6074 

2317 

1332 

33609 

42555 

328971 

(2) 

Surface 

6007 

236 

145 

4908 

1 

15562 

1490 

461 

986 

2008 

3944 

97 

5 

4556 

90093 

9022 

0 

17750 

5836 

369 

3 

1512 

366 

307 

13713 

268 

796 

122 

5047 

58891 

244501 

(3) 

Demonstrated 

Reserve Base (ORB) 

Underground* 

1669 

10'2 

273 

12234 

2 

63286 

8924 

1733 

0 

8199 

16820 

695 

123 

1479 

70959 

2127 

11 

0 

12945 

1238 

15 

28296 

0 

609 

0 

6074 

2317 

1332 

33609 

42555 

317626 

( 4) 

DRB 

Surface* 

3410 

236 

145 

4908 

1 

15562 

1490 

461 

986 

2008 

3944 

97 

5 

4556 

49278 

2498 

0 

9835 

5836 

369 

3 

1512 

366 

307 

13713 

268 

796 

122 

5047 

26636 

154395 

*Source: Coal Production 1985, Table A3, p. 97, U.S. Dept of Energy, 

Washington, D.C., 1986 

d Indicates that a difference exists between DRB estimates and estimates in 

the study. 

Table 83. Minable coal resource base for supply regions affected by land-use 

restrictions, surface minable coal (base case-no land-use restrictions) 

Supply Region 

67 Sheridan & Johnson Cty, Wyo 

68 Rock Springs, Wyo 

75 Forsyth, Montana 

80 Minot, North Dakota 

90 San Juan Cty, New Mexico 

91 McKinley Cty, New Mexico 

92 Carbon Cty, Wyoming 

93 Moffat & Routt Cty, Colo. 

94 Sweetwater Cty, Wyoming 

95 Powder River, Montana 

96 Powder River, Wyoming 

Wyodak Bed, Campbell Cty 

Other Beds 

Camp bell Cty 

Converse Cty 

98 Fort Union, North Dakota 

Total** 

National Surface Minable Tonnage*** 

Base Case 

(Million Short Tons) 

11600 

1954 

855 

2130 

8286 

740 

6478 

3853 

1255 

82985 

37600 

(27500)* 

( 8000) 

( 2100) 

15620 

173356 

244501 

* Parentheses indicate estimate by subregion for the Powder River Basin, Wyoming ** For supply regions shown in table 

*** All coal supply regions 

84 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 84. Minable coal resource base, by DCAM coal supply 

region-no land-use restrictions (million short tons)* 

3 

4 

7 

!; 

9 

10 

ll 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

37 

38 

39 

40 

43 

46 

47 

48 

49 

51 

56 

57 

61 

62 

63 

66 

67 

68 

70 

75 

80 

87 

90 

91 

92 

93 

94 

95 

96 

97 

98 

99 

Supply Region** 

Birmingham, AL 

Jasper, T~ 

Oak Ridge, TN 

Lelbanon, VA 

Pikeville, KY 

Hiddlesboro, KY 

Beattyville, KY 

Salyersville, KY 

Pleasantville, OH 

Cadiz, OH 

Youngstown, OH 

Pitts burgh, PA 

Kittanning, PA 

Sharon, PA 

State College, PA 

Somerset, PA 

Charleston, WV 

Clarks burg, WV 

Philippi, WV 

Peoria, IL 

Ottawa, IL 

Taylorville, IL 

Mt. Vernon, IL 

Tuscola, IL 

Harris burg, IL 

Sullivan, IN 

Horganfield, KY 

Madisonville, KY 

Marshall, TX 

Mt. Pleasant, TX 

Fairfield, TX 

San Antonio, TX 

Poteau, OK 

Muskogee, OK 

Pitts burgh, KN 

Clinton, MO 

Macon, NO 

Mound City, KN 

Albia, IA 

Winslow, AZ 

Raton, NM 

Gunnison, CO 

Steamboat Springs, CO 

Rawlins, WY 

Sheridan & 

Johnson Cty, WY 

Rock Springs, WY 

Price, VT 

Forsyth, MT 

Minot, ND 

Centralia, WA 

San Juan, Cty, NM 

McKinley Cty, NM 

Carbon Cty, WY 

Moffat & Routt Cty, CO 

Sweetwater Cty, WY 

Powder River Basin, ~iT 

Powder River BAsin, WY 

Fort Union Basin, HT 

Fort Union Basin, ND 

Denver Basin, CO 

Total Above Regions 

Total Excluded Regions 

Total U.S. 

Underground 

13000 

143 

483 

586 

8963 

425 

86 

809 

2976 

4623 

1067 

27229 

7036 

418 

6984 

2657 

15536 

2210 

4455 

3088 

4160 

21761 

18357 

6453 

11236 

3897 

10118 

9959 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1133 

378 

43 

188 

949 

0 

1195 

102 

2345 

3001 

933 

899 

11589 

1827 

1621 

6170 

0 

1267 

534 

113 

2717 

5230 

5599 

63944 

20397 

0 

0 

904 

321793 

7178 

328971 

Surface 

3000 

135 

240 

120 

2154 

17 6 

51 

475 

1755 

2386 

501 

1744 

880 

58 

126 

3646 

3646 

222 

774 

6652 

902 

1707 

4974 

677 

873 

794 

1330 

3086 

2237 

4027 

5225 

2224 

288 

209 

1153 

1674 

1923 

388 

318 

236 

0 

338 

0 

716 

11600 

1954 

39 

855 

2131J 

1 ') ') 

8286 

736 

6478 

3853 

1255 

82985 

37600 

4646 

15620 

0 

238765 

5736 

244501 

*Tonnages for supply regions carried forward to DCAM's Market 

Simulation Hodel. See footnote to Table B1. 

**city and State is node for out-bound coal shipments. 

Table!' 85 
Table 85. Btu content and distribution parameters for sulfur content by coal supply region 

Average Distribution Parameters for Sulfur Content 

Btu Content (% By Weight) 

Su:e:ell Reston (Btu/lb) Minimum Maximum Ave rase 

3 Birmingham, AL 13188 0.40 4.90 1.22 

4 Jasper, TN 13214 0.49 5.30 0.89 

7 Oak Ridge, TN 13280 0.48 5.48 1.85 

8 Lebanon, VA 13598 0.40 5.57 0.63 

9 Pikeville, KY 13505 0.19 6.61 o;8o 

10 Middlesboro, KY 13377 0.48 6.70 1.21 

11 Beattyville, KY 12306 o.so 4.05 1.50 

12 Salyersville, KY 12284 0.70 5.80 1.89 

13 Pleasantville, OR 11590 1.00 10.00 2.35 

14 Cadiz, OR 12197 1.00 10.00 3.15 

15 Youngstown, OR 12237 1.00 10.00 3.20 

16 Pittsburgh, PA 13144 1.00 6.50 2.10 

17 Kittanning, PA 13441 1.00 7.76 1.87 

18 -Sharon, PA 12771 1.00 6.79 3.12 

19 State College, PA 13161 1.00 5.10 1.70 

20 Somerset, PA 13520 0.80 6.29 1.58 

21 Charleston, WV 13673 0.39 6.80 0.84 

22 Clarksburg, WV 13251 0.80 6.45 2.70 

23 Philippi, WV 13714 0.39 5.78 1.61 

26 Peoria, IL 10632 2.42 5.37 3.27 

27 Ottawa, IL 10995 1.46 8.46 4.18 

28 Taylorville, IL 10561 2.62 5.16 4.16 

29 Mt. Vernon, IL 11450 0.75 5.76 2.56 

30 Tuscola, IL 11063 0.75 6.20 2.38 

31 Harrisburg, IL 12396 0.75 4.35 2.14 

32 Sullivan, IN 11443 0.75 7.07 2.82 

33 Morganfield, KY 11811 1.00 6.70 3.20 

34 Madisonville, KY 12215 1.00 6.70 3.20 

37 Marshall, TX 6200 0.52 1.95 0.91 

38 Mt. Pleasant, TX 6200 0.40 1.80 0.69 

39 Fairfield, TX 7000 0.60 1.39 0.96 

40 San Antonio, TX 6200 0.50 2.50 1.00 

43 Poteau, OK 13488 o.so 9.10 1.66 

46 Muskogee, OK 13059 o.so 7.27 2.08 

47 Pittsburgh, KN 12153 1.15 12.30 3.40 

48 Clinton, MO 11623 2.03 9.80 3.63 

49 Macon, MO 10815 2.60 8.20 4.65 

51 Mound City, KN 10471 4.82 5.17 5.00 

56 Albia, IA 9959 1.65 13.10 4.73 

57 Winslow, AZ 10602 0.40 2.32 0.66 

61 Raton, NM 12332 o. 38 2.09 0.60 

62 Gunnison, CO 11700 0.28 2.62 0.79 

63 Steamboat Springs, co 10989 0.27 1.11 0.46 

66 Rawlins, WY 9505 0.25 1.40 0.45 

67 Sheridan & 

Johnson City, WY 8572 0.25 2.20 0.59 

68 Rock Springs, WY 10864 0-27 4.72 0.72 

70 Price, VT 12383 0.38 3.90 0.76 

75 Forsyth, MT 10258 0.36 1.83 0.76 

80 Minot, ND 6500 0.30 1.95 0.30 

87 Centralia, WA 10796 0.25 4.21 0.56 

90 San Juan City, NM 9639 0.30 3.00 0.64 

91 McKinley City, NM 11309 0.36 2.51 0.54 

92 Carbon City, WY 10430 0.25 4.00 0.75 

93 Moffat & Routt Cty, co 10700 0.25 3.10 0.80 

94 Sweetwater Cty, WY 9580 0.25 3.00 0.94 

95 Powder River Basin, MT 9200 0.25 3.50 0.66 

96 Powder River Basin, WY 8400 0.20 2.50 0.79 

97 Fort Union Basin, MT 6645 0.30 4.10 0.74 

98 Fort Union Basin, ND 6500 0.30 3.20 0.67 

99 Denver Basin, CO 9770 0.30 0.87 0.32 

86 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 86. Minable coal resource base by supply region (base case)-tonnage distributed by sulfur content and 

average Btu content 

Tonna~e Distributed bl Sulfur Content 

Aver. Aver. Aver. Aver. 

Type of Sulf. Sulf. Sulf. Sulf. Aver. 

Mining Cont. Cont. Cont. Cont. Btu 

Supply (S-Surf. Mill. (% by Mill. (% by Mill. (% by Mill. % by Cont. 

Res ion U-Under) Tons Wei~ht) Tons Wei8ht2 Tons Wei&ht) Tons Weisht) (btu/lb*) 

3 s 384 0.65 480 0.99 1068 1.73 1068 3.59 13188 

u 1664 0.65 2078 0.99 4629 1.73 4629 3.59 13188 

4 s 17 0.64 20 0.99 49 1.79 49 3.85 13214 

u 18 0.64 21 0.99 52 1.79 52 3.85 13214 

7 s 29 0.64 105 1.48 105 3.82 13280 

u 59 0.64 212 1.48 212 3.82 13280 

8 s 18 0.61 17 1.02 42 1.86 42 4.03 13598 

u 90 0.61 81 1.02 207 1.86 207 4.03 13598 

9 s 394 o.so 237 1.01 761 2.01 761 4.70 13505 

u 1640 o.so 987 1.01 3168 2.01 3168 4.70 13505 

10 s 18 0.64 21 1.00 69 2.01 69 4.76 13377 

u 43 0.64 50 1.00 166 2.01 166 4.76 13377 

11 s 7 0.62 22 1.22 22 2.88 12306 

u 11 0.62 38 1.22 38 2.88 12306 

12 s 7 0.72 234 1.48 234 4.01 12284 

u 12 o. 72 398 1.48 398 4.01 12284 

13 s 878 2.32 878 6.82 11590 

u 1488 2.32 1488 6.82 11590 

14 s 1193 2.32 1193 6.82 12197 

u 2311 2.32 2311 6.82 12197 

15 s 250 2.32 250 6.82 12237 

u 533 2.32 533 6.82 12237 

16 s 872 1.81 872 4.56 13144 

u 13614 1.81 13614 4.56 13144 

17 s 440 1.99 440 5.37 13441 

u 3518 1.99 3518 5.37 13441 

18 s 29 1.95 29 4.84 12771 

u 209 1.95 209 4.84 12771 

19 s 63 1.60 63 3.65 13161 

u 3492 1.60 3492 3.65 13161 

20 s 106 1.61 106 4.35 13520 

u 11 0.81 1323 1.61 1323 4.35 13520 

21 s 476 0.60 420 1.03 1375 2.05 1375 4.83 13673 

u 2030 0.60 1789 1.03 5858 2.05 5858 4.83 13673 

22 s 111 1.64 111 4.47 13251 

u 1105 1.64 1105 4.47 13251 

23 s 119 0.61 104 1.03 275 1.90 275 4.17 13714 

u 688 0.61 600 1.03 1583 1.90 1583 4.17 13714 

26 s 3326 2.85 3326 4.33 10632 

u 1544 2.85 1544 4.33 10632 

27 s 451 2.70 451 6.19 10955 

u 2080 2.70 2080 6.19 10955 

28 s 853 3.43 853 4.70 10561 

u 10880 3.~3 10880 4.70 10561 

29 s 2487 1.56 2487 4.06 11450 

u 9179 1.56 9179 4.06 11450 

30 s 339 1.55 339 4.27 11063 

u 3226 1.55 3226 4.27 11063 

31 s 437 1.38 437 3.18 12396 

u 5618 1. 38 5618 3.18 12396 

32 s 397 1.68 397 4.83 11443 

u 1948 1.68 1948 4.83 11443 

33 s 665 2.00 665 4.85 11811 

u 5059 2.00 5059 4.85 11811 

34 s 1543 2.00 1543 4.85 12215 

u 4980 2.00 4980 4.85 12215 

37 s 1118 0.73 1118 1.44 6200 

38 s 2014 0.61 2014 1.31 6200 

39 s 2612 o. 77 2612 1.17 7000 

40 s 1112 0.79 1112 1.79 6200 

43 s 20 0.65 134 2.02 134 6.17 13488 

u 80 0.65 526 2.02 ·526 6.17 13488 

46 s 17 0.64 96 1.73 96 4.97 13059 

u 31 0.64 174 1.73 174 4.97 13059 

47 s 577 2.78 577 8.36 12153 

u 22 2.78 22 8.36 12153 

48 s 837 3.17 837 7.05 11623 

Table~ 87 
Table 86. Minable coal resource base by supply region (base case)-tonnage distributed by sulfur content and 

average Btu content-Continued 

Aver. Aver. Aver. Aver. 

Type of Sulf. Sulf. Sulf. Sulf. Aver. 

Mining Cont. Cont. Cont. Cont. Btu 

Supply (S-Surf. Mill. (% by Mill. (% by Millo (% by Mill. % by Cont. 

Res ion U-Under~ Tons Weisht) Tons Wei&ht) Tons Weisht) Tons Weisht~ (btu/lb*2 

Tonnase Distributed bl Sulfur Content 

u 94 3.17 94 7.05 11623 

49 s 961 3.52 961 6.32 10815 

u 475 3.52 475 6.32 10815 

51 s 194 4.91 194 5.09 10471 

56 s 159 3.33 159 9.05 9959 

u 598 3.33 598 9.05 9959 

57 s 55 0.52 91 0.88 91 1. 72 10602 

u 23 0.52 39 0.88 39 1.72 10602 

61 u 884 0.56 731 0.94 731 1.61 12332 

62 s 111 0.49 114 0.98 114 1.94 11700 

u 985 0.49 1008 0.98 1008 1.94 11700 

63 u 667 0.46 266 0.88 10989 

66 s 343 0.41 186 0.69 186 1.11 9505 

u 431 0.41 234 0.69 234 1.11 9505 

67 s 2931 0.38 4334 0.76 4334 1.60 8572 

u 2929 0.38 4330 0.76 4330 1.60 8572 

68 s 320 0.46 817 1.25 817 3.28 10864 

u 299 0.46 764 1.25 764 3.28 10864 

70 s 8 0.56 16 1.21 16 2.78 12383 

u 319 0.56 651 1.21 651 2.78 12383 

75 s 275 0.49 290 0.79 290 1.40 10258 

u 1981 0.49 2095 0.79 2095 1.40 10258 

80 s 226 0.34 952 0.62 952 1.40 6500 

87 s 23 0.45 49 1.17 49 2.95 10776 

u 242 0.45 513 1.17 513 2.95 10796 

90 s 1620 0.44 3333 0.93 3333 2.14 9639 

u 105 0.44 215 0.93 215 2.14 9639 

91 s 203 0.52 267 0.95 267 1.86 11309 

u 31 0.52 41 0.95 41 1.86 11309 

92 s 1233 0.44 2622 1.12 2622 2.81 10430 

u 517 0.44 1100 1.12 1100 2.81 10430 

93 s 987 0.45 1433 1.00 1433 2.23 10700 

u 1340 0.45 1945 1.00 1945 2.23 10700 

94 s 279 0.41 488 0.93 488 2.14 9580 

u 1244 0.41 2177 0.93 2177 2.14 9580 

95 s 14706 0.40 34140 0.98 34140 2.46 9200 

u 11332 0.40 26306 0.98 26306 2.46 9200 

96A** s 6789 0.35 10355 0.80 10355 1.79 8400 

u 3683 0.35 5617 0.80 5617 1.79 8400 

96B*** s 1975 0.35 3012 0.80 3012 1.79 8400 

u 1071 0.35 1634 o.8o 1634 1.79 8400 

96C**** s 518 0.35 791 o.8o 791 1.79 8400 

u 281 0.35 429 0.80 429 1.79 8400 

97 s 238 0.35 2204 0.94 2204 2.79 6645 

98 s 954 0.34 7333 o.8o 7333 2.21 6500 

99 u 680 0.44 224 0.73 9771 

*Btu content applies to coal in all sulfur content classes. 

**Supply Region 96A is coal from the Wyodak Bed in Campbell County, Wyoming 

***Supply Region 96B 1s coal from beds, other than the Wyodak Bed, in Campbell County, Wyoming. 

****Supply Region 96C is coal from beds in Converse County, Wyoming. 

88 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table C1. Acres defined unsuitable by screen #2 

Resource 

Hanagement 

Area a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 

Little Snake 32Z 0 1,486 0 0 0 0 0 7,541 0 45,898 7,541b 2,402 2,681 37,960 5,104 0 0 1,948c 0 

(Supply Region 

9 3) 

Headwaters 

Resource 0 126d 369d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,260d 25d 0 0 0 0 

Area 

Hedicine 

Bow 

National 

Forest and 0 1. 7 61 422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Thunder 

Basin 

National 

C:rasslancis 

(Supply 

Regions 

66, 96) 

North 

nakota 

Resource 13,939e 0 43, 383f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,239e 0 98 23,943e 107,765e 15,515e 0 0 32,009e .0 

~fa nag erne n t 

Plan (Supply 

Regions 80, 

9 8) 

Grand 

Junction 0 40 4. l 00 45,419 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,100g 10,000 0 0 0 

Resource 

Area (Supply 

Region 62) 

White River 

Resource 0 160 0 0 0 0 3,200 0 1,920 5,480 10,520 1,920 0 2,960 34,370 2,120 0 0 2,190 0 

Area: Craig 

District 

(Supply Regions 

62, 63) 

-1 

I» 

c::r 

;-

Ill 

I.C = 
~ 

m 

8 

= Q 

3 

;:;· 

m 

;: 

a. 

s. 

i 

3 

~ !l 

.... 

Slol 

= 0.. 

C: 

Ill 

II> 

;:11.:1 

II> 

~ .. 

a: 

a· 

= Ill 

Q 

= c 

~ 

("') 

Q 

e!.. 

f 

[ 

Ill 

Table Cl. Acres defined unsuitable by screen #2-Continued 

Resource 

Hanagement 

Area a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 

Salt Wells 0 120h 14 0 0 0 640 0 0 0 1,020 0 500 1,100 

Area (Suppl.y 

Region 94) 

Hedicine 

Bow-Divide 

Resource 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

Uanap,ement 

Plan (Supply 

Reglon 92) 

Rock 

Springs 

District 0 84 R 0 0 0 920i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(Supply 

Region 94) 

Farmington 

Resource 

Hanagement 

Area (Supply 0 0 0 0 0 0 360 0 0 0 0 0 724 0 

aThe citations for each of the documents can be found in the reference list 

at the end of Table C2. 

bThese lands are the same as identified in criterion 9. 

clncludes 1,081 acre overlap with criterion 16. 

dEtiminnted from surface occupancy. 

eNo consideration given to overlap among unsuitability criteria. 

!Criterion 3 acreages not included in net total because overlap with other criteria is unknown. 

gSame acreage as criterion 3. 

hAfter exceptions. 

!Surface operations and impacts only - coal tonages not affected. 

15 16 17 18 19 20 

3, 5 60h Oh 0 0 0 0 

0 10 0 0 0 0 

Oh Oh 0 0 0 0 

5,683 0 0 0 0 0 
Table C2. Acres removed from consideration for further coal leasing~ screens #2, #3, 

and #4 

Resource Management Area 

Headwaters Resource Area (Butte 

District, Montana), Supply Region 76 

Screen 

#2 

(Unsuitability Criteria) 

1,780 

North Dakota Resource Management 193,382b 

(All counties, NO), Supply Regions 80, 

98 

Grand Junction Resource Area 

(Grand Junction, CO), Supply Region 62 

White R1ver Resource Area 

(Craig District, CO), Supply Regions 62, 63 

Salt Wells Area (Rock Springs District), Supply Region 94 

Big Sandy Area (Rock Springs District), Supply Regions 69, 94 

Little Snake Resource Area 

(Craig District, CO), Supply Region 93 

Billings Resource Area, 

Supply Region. 75 

Kremmling Resource Area, 

Supply Region 63 

Medicine Bow National Forest 

and Thunder Basin National 

Grasslands, Supply Regions 

66, 96 

Powder River Resource Area 

(Miles City District, MT), 

Supply Region 95 

Buffalo Resource Area (Powder River District, WY), Supply Regions 

67. 96 

Platte ~iver Resource Area, 

Supply Regions 66 and 96 

Kemmerer-Evanston Resource 

Area (WY), Supply Region 68 

Farmington Resource Area, Supply Region 90 

Rio Puerco Resource Management Plan (Albuquerque District, NM), 

Supply Region 90 

Medicine Bow-Divide Resource 

Management Plan (Carbon County, Casper Office, WY, Supply Region 92 

59,919 

58,845 

2,126 

1,200 

104,261 

120 

0 

2,183 

61,615 

145,000 

4,o60 

3,281 

6,767 

99 

20 

Screen 

113 

(Multiple Use) 

0 

256,099c 

59,599d 

N/ A 

0 

160 

68,808 

2,480 

7,190 

0 

95,100 

221,000 

3,443 

40 

129 7 

0 

3,420 

creen 

114 

(Surface 

Owner 

Consent) 

0 

131,530 

0 

1,580 

N/A 

N/A 

0 

10,920 

5,700 

0 

98,543 

0 

10,000 

40 

N/A 

0 

0 

aCaution is urged in the use of the above values. Many of the sources for 

the information were draft reports and personal communication. 

Additionally, some values obtained from various resource management 

reports might be duplicates as suggested by Betsy Daniels of the BLM, 

Colorado Office. Those individuals that provided specific information are Kit Mueller, Al Stein, Betsy Daniels, and Don Brabson. These values are presented for illustrative purposes and were not utilized in the 

DCAM analysis. 

bCriterion 3 acreages npt included. in net total because overlap with other 

criteria is unknown. 

cNet. 

Ta"les 91 
Jf. 

Table C2. Acres removed from consideration for further coal leasing: screens #2, #3, and 

#4-Continued 

dl4,180 acres along the Colorado River and 45,419 wilderness areas. 

*Reference documents for each Resource Area: 

U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Land and Resource 

Management Plan: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Volume II: 

Appendices, Medicine Bow National Forest and Thunder Basin National 

Grassland, WY, 1984-780-842/5037 {Washington, DC: U.S. Government 

Printing Office), 1984. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, ~C~o~a~l~=--~W~y~o~m~1~·n~g 

Land Use Decisions, Big Sandy Resource Area, Rock Springs District, 

Rock Springs, WY (November 1981). 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Coal: Wyoming 

Land Use Decisions, Salt Wells Resource Area, Rock Springs District, 

Rock Springs, WY (November 1981). 

u.s. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Coal Amendment 

to the White River Resource Area Land Us Plan, Craig District, CO 

( De c em be r 1 9 8 1 ) • 

u.s. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Billings 

Resource Area: Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Resource 

Management Plan, Billings, MT, 1983-693-052/1 (Washington, DC: u.s. 

Government Printing Office), April 1983. 

u.s. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Headwaters 

Resource Area: Draft Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Butte District, MT, 1983-676-071/57 (Washington, DC: u.s. 

Government Printing Office), May 1983. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Headwaters 

Resource Area: Final Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Butte District, MT, 1983-776-061/1031 (Washington, DC: 

U.S. Government Printing Office), November 1983. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Kremmling 

Resource Area: Draft Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Volumes 1-2, Kremmling Resource Area, CO, 1983-676-071/42 

(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), 1983. 

92 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table C2. * Acres removed from consideration for further coal leasing: screens #2, #3, and 

#4-Continued 

u.s. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Platte River 

Resource Area: Draft Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Platte River Resource Area, WY, 1984-776-061/1055 

(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), February 1984. 

U.s. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo 

Resource Area: Draft Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Casper District, WY, 1984-776-061/10000 (Washington, DC: 

U.S. Government Printing Office), July 1984. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Platte River 

Resource Area: Final Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Platte River Resource Area, WY, 1984-776-061/10017 

(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), November 1984. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Kremmling 

Resource Area: Final Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Volume 3, Kremmling Resource Area, CO, 1984-0-776-061/1065 

(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), 1984. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Powder River 

Resource Area Resource Management Plan, Miles City District: Final 

Environmental Impact Statement, Miles City District, MT, 1984-0-576-

070/10025 (Washington, DC: u.s. Government Printing Office) December 

1984. 

u.s. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo 

Resource Area: Final Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact 

Statement, Casper District, WY, 1985-576-070/10056 (Washington, DC: 

u.s. Government Printing Office), 1985. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Grand Junction 

Resource Area: Draft Resource Management Plan and Environmental 

Impact Statement , Grand Junction District, CO, 1985-576-070-10042 

(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), March 1985. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Rio Puerco 

Resource Area Draft Resource Management Plan, Albuquerque District, 

NM, BLM-NM-PT-85-005-4410, March 1985. 

Tables 93 
Table C2. Acres * removed from consideration for further coal leasing: screens #2, #3, and 

#4-Continued 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Grand Junction 

Resource Area: Final Resource Management Plan and Environmental 

Impact Statement, Grand Junction District, CO, 1985-576-070/20008 

(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office), November 1985. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Little Snake 

Draft Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 

Craig, Colorado District, CO, 1985-676-066/20,005 (Washington, DC: 

U.S. Government Printing Office), February 1986. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Little Snake 

Final Resource Management Plan and Environmental. Impact Statement, 

Craig, Colorado District, CO, 1986-676-066/40008 (Washington, DC: 

U.S. Government Printing Office), September 1986. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Rio Puerco 

Resource Area Final Resource Management Plan, Albuquerque District, 

NM, BLM-NM-PT-87-002-4410, November 1986. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Dakota 

Draft Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 

Di~kinson District, ND, 1986-773-065/40035 (Washington, DC: u.s. 

Government Printing Office), December 1986. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Farmington 

Resource Area Resource Management Plan Albuquerque District, NM, BLMNM-PT-87-005-4410, March 1987. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Medicine 

Bow/Divide Resource Management Plan: Coal Appendix, April 1987. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Dakota 

Final Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 

Dickinson District, ND, 1987-773-065/40062 (Washington, DC: u.s. 

Government Printing Office), July 1987. 

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, West HiLine: 

Draft ResourceManagement Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, 

Lewistown District, MT, 1987-773-065/40059 (Washington, DC: u.s. 

Government Printing Office), May 1987. 

94 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table C3. Surface minable coal resource base under alternative resource cases for supply regions 

affected by land-use restrictions (million short tons) 

Partially Restricted Case - Base Restricted Unsuitability Criteria SUQQl~ Region Case Case land-·Use Restrictions lifted 

67 Sheridan & Johnson Cty, Wyo 11600 9700 11289 

68 Rock Springs, Wyo 1954 1950 1950 

75 Forsyth, Montana 855 460 465 

80 Minot, North Dakota 2130 1360 1640 

90 San Juan Cty, New Mexico 8286 8210 8264 

91 McKinley Cty, New Mexico 740 740 740 

92 Carbon Cty, Wyoming 6478 4300 5940 

93 Moffat & Routt Cty, Colo. 3853 3750 3800 

94 Sweetwater Cty, Wyoming 1255 1170 1240 

95 Powder River, Montana 82985 40200 43466 

96 Powder River, Wyoming 37600 26600 30800 

Wyodak Bed, Campbell Cty (27500)** (18800) (22100) 

Other Beds, Campbell Cty ( 8000) ( 6100) ( 6800) Converse Cty ( 2100) ( 1700) ( 1900) 

98 Fort Union, North Dakota 15620 7900 10700 

Total* 173356 106340 120294 

National Surface Minable 244501 177489 191443 

Coal Resources 

* For supply regions shown in table 

** Parentheses indicate estimates by subregion for the Wyoming portion of the Powder River 

Basin. 

Tabl""s 95 
.,c 

"" 

m 

8 

Q = 

3 

?i" 

~ 

a 

s. 

~ 3 

a. "" 

I'D 

!.. 

:; 

= Q. 

c. 

; 

~ 

!! 

"'I 

[ 

s· 

= Ill 

Q 

= c: 

~ 

~ 

E 

"'I 

[ 

Ill 

Table 01. Distribution of overburden* ratios for supply regions impacted by coal land restrictions (base case)-surface .,- minable coal 

67 

68 

75 

80 

90 

91 

92 

93 

94 

95 

96 

98 

Distribution of Overburden Ratios (OBR) 

OBR OBR OBR 

feet of overburden/ feet of overburden/ feet of overburden/ 

Supply Region feet of coal % feet of coal % feet of coal % 

Sheridan & Johnson Cty, WY 5 47:0 10 20:0 20 """'25.'0 

Rock Springs, WY 5 44.0 15 24.0 -40 32.0 

Forsyth, MT 3 28.0 5 22.0 7 11.0 

Minot, ND 5 60.0 10 40.0 

San Juan Cty, NM 5 15.0 10 25.0 20 35.0 

McKinley Cty, NM 5 15.0 10 25.0 20 35.0 

Carbon Cty, WY 5 35.0 10 20.0 25 20.0 

Moffat & Routt Cty, CO 5 10.0 10 35.0 15 30.0 

Sweetwater Cty, WY 5 25.0 10 20.0 20 30.0 

Powder River Basin, MT 3 24.0 4 29.0 5 30.0 

Powder River Basin, WY 

Wyodak Bed, Campbell Cty 1 21.0 2 32.0 3 33.0 

Other Beds, Campbell Cty 5 41.2 6 :5.3 7 32.0 

Converse Cty 7 35.6 17 45.2 27 19.2 

Fort Union, MD 5 60.0 10 40.0 

*Overburden is defined as total material other than subject coal beds 

¥¥Estimation of coal mining cost in appendix D requires overburden ratios calculated as cubic yards per ton. Conversion from 

feet/feet (as shown in this table) to cubic yards/ton gives the same approximate overburden ratio. 

OBR 

feet of overburden/ 

feet of coal 

40 

13 

30 

30 

35 

20 

40 

8 

4 

10 

r. 

s.o 

3q.o 

25.0 

25.0 

25.0 

25.0 

25.0 

17.0 

14.0 

11.5 
Table D2. Deliverable coal resources by supply region (base case) 

Deliverable Mineable Demonstrated 

Coal Resources Coal Resources * Reserve Base (DRB) 

Supply Region (million tons) (million tons) (million tons)** 

3 Birmingham, AL 8675 16000 2058 

4 Jasper, TN 158 278 278 

7 Oak Ridge, TN 416 723 723 

8 Lebanon, VA 383 706 706 

9 Pikeville, KY 6125 11117 11117 

10 Middlesboro, KY 335 601 601 

11 Beattyville, KY 75 137 137 

12 Salyersville, KY 722 1284 1284 

13 Pleasantville, OH 2679 4731 4731 

14 Cadiz, OR 3970 7009 7009 

15 Youngstown, OR 875 1568 1568 

16 Pittsburgh, PA 15735 28973 28973 

17 Kittanning, PA 4390 7916 7916 

18 Sharon, PA 257 476 476 

19 State College, PA 3791 7110 7110 20~ Somerset, PA 1562 2869 2869 

21 Charleston, WV 10648 19182 19182 

22 Clarks burg, WV 1313 2432 2432 

23 Philippi, WV 2838 5229 5229 

26 Peoria, IL 3581 9740 9740 

27 Ottawa, IL 2198 5062 5062 

28 Taylorsville, IL 10910 23468 23468 

29 Mt. Vernon, IL 10240 23331 23331 

30 Tuscola, IL 3265 7130 7130 

31 Harrisburg, IL 5583 12109 12109 

32 Sullivan, IN 2102 4691 4691 

33 Morganfield, KY 5860 11448 11448 

34 Madisonville, KY 6860 13045 13045 

37 Marshall, TX 1808 2237 2237 

38 Mt. Pleasant, TX 3227 4027 4027 

39 Farfield, TX 4231 5225 5225 

40 San Antonio, TX 1801 2224 2224 

43 Poteau, OK 685 1421 1421 

46 Muskogee, OK 298 587 587 

47 Pitts burgh, KS 798 1198 1196 

48 Clinton, MO 1218 1862 1862 

49 Macon, MO 1727 2872 2872 

51 Mound City, KS 250 388 388 

56 Albia, IA 852 1513 1513 

57 Winston, AZ 740 338 338 

61 Raton, NM 1243 2345 2345 

62 Gunnison, CO 1846 3339 3339 

63 Steamboat Springs, co 473 933 933 

66 Rawlins, WY 914 1615 1615 

67 Sheridan & Johnson Cty, WY 14883 23189 12833 

68 Rock Springs, WY 2303 3781 2952 

70 Price, VT 892 1660 1660 

75 Forsyth, MT 3348 7025 667 

80 Minot, ND 1628 2130 1201 

87 Centralia, WA 581 1389 1389 

90 San Juan Cty, NM 6750 8820 2755 

91 McKinley Cty, NM 579 849 390 

92 Carbon Cty, WY 6328 9195 3239 

93 Moffat & Routt Cty, co 57 55 9083 9083 

94 Sweetwater Cty, WY 3768 6854 6854 

95 Powder River Basin, MT 98341 146929 106462 

96 Powder River Basin, WY 39326 57997 42883 

97 Fort Union Basin, MT 3591 4646 4646 

98 Fort Union, ND 11942 15620 8634 

99 Denver Basin, CO 362 904 904 

Total Above Regions 338033 560N 459107 

Total Excluded Regions 7788 12914 12914 

Total u.s. 345821 573472 472021 

*From Table B4 

**Estimated by distributing 1985 DRB state projections using county-state shares from 1974 

DRB file. u.s. DRB total agrees with DOE totals (excluding Alaska) in Coal Production 1985 

(u.s. Department of Energy, 1986, Table A3 P• 97). 

Tables 97 
Table DJ. RAMC mining cost equations 

A. Variables 

R = the maximum overburden ratio, in cubic yards per ton 

0 = the depth of the seam in feet 

T = annual production, in millions of tons per year 

c1 = initial capital costs, in millions of 1980 dollars 

c0 = deferred capital costs, in millions of 1980 dollars 

CA =annual operating costs, in millions of 1980 dollars 

B. Surface Mines 

Contour Strip Mine 

C1 = 0.378(R)(T) + 2.558(T) + 1.289 

Co= 0.74(R){T) + 5.916{T)0.881 + 2.132 

CA = 0.45{R)(T) + 5.059{T) + 0.613 

Modified Area Mine 

C1 = 2.181(R)(T) + 2.220(T) + 1.373 

c0 = 8.022(T) + 4.832 

CA = 0.893(R)(T) + 1.216(T)0.562 + 2.722(T) + 1.534 

600,000 Tons/Year Area Mine 

C1 = 2.026(R)(T) + 2.385(T) + 8.425 

c0 = 11.935(T) + 13.758 

CA = 0.813(R)(T) + 2.44(T)0.62 + 3.314(T) + 4.353 

3,000,000 Tons/Year Area Mine 

C1 = 2.267(R){T) + 1.927(T) + 7.415 

Co = 3.044(T) + 14.281 

CA = 0.9ll{R)(T) + 1.158(T)0.539 + 2.765{T) + 3.943 

Open Pit Mine 

c1 = 1.294{R)(T) + 3.018(T)0.772 + 2.443 

Co= 2.708(R)(T) + 1.978(T) + 9.516 

CA = 1.005{R)(T) + 1.189(T)O.l72 + 2.383(T) + 2.209 

98 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

C. Underground Mines 

167,000 Tons/Year Drift Mine 

CI = 19.64{T) + 0.0103{0) 

Co = 29. 94( T) 

CA = 23.89{T) + 0.001(D)(T) 

167,000 Tons/Year Thin-Seam Drift Mine 

c1 = 24.37(T) + o.o103{D) 

c0 = 37.13(T) 

CA = 23.68(T) + 0.001{D){T) 

500,000 Tons/Year Shaft/Slope l~ine 

CI = 27.06(T) + 0.0103{0) 

c0 = 28.06{T) 

CA = 28.34{T) + 0.001(D)(T) 

500,000 Tons/Year Thin-Seam Shaft/51 ope Mine: 

c1 = 35.86{T) + 0.0103{0) 

Co = 35.48{T) 

CA = 35.04{T) + 0.001(D)(T) 

500,000 Tons/Year Deep-Seam Shaft/Slope 11ine 

c1 = 55.12(T) + 0.0103{0) 

C0 = 42.48(T) 

CA = 44.62{T) + 0.001(D)(T) 

1,000,000 Tons/Year Shaft/Slope Mine 

c1 = 23.08(T) + 0.0103(0) 

c0 = 27.86(T) 

CA = 23.28(T) + 0.001(D)(T) 

1,000,000 Tons/Year Deep-Seam Shaft/Slope Mine 

c1 = 42.19(T) + o.o103(D) 

c0 = 41.57{T) 

CA = 35.57(T) + 0.001(D)(T) 

1,000,000 Tons/Year Drift Mine 

c1 = 19.67(T) + 0.0103(0) 

C0 = 29. 76(T) 

CA = 21.14(T) + O.OOl(D)(T) 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur a'ld Btu 

content 

MINING SULF BTU 

SUP COST (1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REGION STEP $/TON) ( 1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL $38.44 653 1 . 73 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 2 $38.44 653 3.59 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 3 $39.03 164 0.65 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 $39.03 177 0.99 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5 $51.69 1386 1. 73 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 6 $51.69 1386 3.59 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7 $54.20 235 0.65 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 8 $54.20 337 0.99 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 9 $70.95 1527 1. 73 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 10 $70.95 1527 3.59 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 11 $71.97 284 0.65 13188 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 12 $71.97 347 0.99 13188 

4 JASPER, TN 1 $21.68 1 0.99 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 2 $22.00 22 1. 79 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 3 $22.00 22 3.85 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 4 $22.32 7 0.64 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 5 $25.58 12 0.99 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 6 $25.90 11 1. 79 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 7 $25.90 11 3.85 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 8 $26.99 3 0.64 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 9 $38.85 10 0.99 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 10 $40.02 9 0.64 13214 

4 JASPER, TN 11 $41. 19 25 1. 79 13214 

4 JASPER. TN 12 $41. 19 25 3.85 13214 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 1 $30.22 8 0.64 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 2 $30.35 33 1. 48 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 3 $30.35 33 3.82 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 4 $38.84 26 0.64 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 5 $39.31 92 1. 48 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 6 $39.31 92 3.82 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 7 $65 33 16 0.64 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 8 $76. 16 58 1. 48 13280 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 9 $76. 16 58 3.82 13280 

8 LEBANON, VA 1 $28.25 76 1. 86 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 2 $28.25 76 4.03 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 3 $28.43 34 0.61 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 4 $28.43 30 1 .02 13598 

8 LEBANO.N, VA 5 $35.63 13 1 .02 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 6 $35.66 35 1.86 13598 

8 LEBANON. VA 7 $35.66 35 4.03 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 8 $35.84 15 0.61 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 9 $51.45 10 1. 02 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 10 $52.50 24 1.86 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 11 $52.50 24 4.03 13598 

8 LEBANON, VA 12 $54.61 11 0.61 13598 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 1 $24. 13 614 0.50 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 2 $24. 13 374 1.01 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE. KY 3 $24.24 1145 2.01 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 4 $24.24 1145 4. 70 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 5 $31.41 646 2-.01 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 6 $31.41 646 4.70 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 7 $31.46 336 0.50 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 8 $31.46 197 1.01 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 9 $57.92 375 2.01 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 10 $57.92 375 4.70 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 11 $59.45 170 0.50 13505 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 12 $59.45 103 1.01 13505 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 1 $26.06 3 0.64 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 2 $26.06 14 2.01 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 3 $26.06 14 4.76 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 4 $26.06 4 1.00 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 5 $32.96 21 0.64 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 6 $32.96 81 2.01 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 7 $32.96 81 4.76 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 8 $32.96 24 1.00 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 9 $67.41 10 0.64 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 10 $76.43 12 1.00 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 11 $81 .05 37 2.01 13377 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 12 $81.05 37 4.76 13377 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 1 $23.76 6 1. 22 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 2 $23.76 6 2.88 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 3 $25.55 2 0.62 12306 

Ta~les 99 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur and Btu 

content-Continued 

MINING SULF BTU 

SUP COST ( 1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REGION STEP $/TON) ( 1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

11 BEATTYVILLE. KY 4 $32.29 2 0.62 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 5 $32.29 6 1. 22 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 6 $32.29 6 2.88 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 7 $43.28 6 0.62 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 8 $49.04 21 1. 22 12306 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 9 $49.04 21 2.88 12306 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 1 $22.52 79 1. 48 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 2 $22.52 79 4.01· 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 3 $25.65 2 0. 72 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 4 $28.72 5 0.72 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 5 $30.5:2 191 1.48 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 6 $30.52 191 4.01 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 7 $35. 11 4 0. 72 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 8 $69.46 86 1. 48 12284 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 9 $69.46 86 4.01 12284 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 1 $19.83 242 2.32 11590 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 2 $19.83 242 6.82 11590 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 3 $32.30 263 2.32 11590 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 4 $32.30 263 6.82 11590 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 5 $54.20 835 2.32 11590 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 6 $54.20 835 6.82 11590 

14 CADIZ, OH 1 $30.27 326 2.32 12197 

14 CADIZ. OH 2 $30.27 326 6.82 12197 

14 CADIZ, OH 3 $47.76 485 2.32 12197 

14 CADIZ, OH 4 $47.76 485 6.82 12197 

14 CADIZ, OH 5 $66.31 1174 2.32 12197 

14 CADIZ, OH 6 $66.31 1174 6.82 12197 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 1 $22.60 67 2.32 12237 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 2 $22.60 67 6.82 12237 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 3 $41.96 83 2.32 12237 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 4 $41 .96 83 6.82 12237 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 5 $63.54 287 2.32 12237 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 6 $63.54 287 6.82 12237 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 1 $24.24 1215 1.81 13144 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 2 $24.24 1215 4.56 13144 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 3 $38.74 4323 1. 81 13144 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 4 $38.74 4323 4.56 13144 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 5 $66.48 2330 1.81 13144 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 6 $66.48 2330 4.56 13144 

17 KITTANNING, ·pA 1 $24. 14 859 1.99 13441 

17 KITTANNING, PA 2 $24. 14 859 5.37 13441 

17 KITTANNING, PA 3 $36.01 692 1.99 13441 

17 KITTANNING, PA 4 $36.01 692 5.37 13441 

17 KITTANNING, PA 5 $53.66 644 1. 99 13441 

17 KITTANNING, PA 6 $53.66 644 5.37 13441 

18 SHARON, PA 1 $34.93 60 1. 95 12771 

18 SHARON, PA 2 $34.93 60 4.84 12771 

18 SHARON, PA 3 $51.35 21 1.95 12771 

18 SHARON, PA 4 $51 . 35 21 4.84 12771 

18 SHARON, PA 5 $90.48 47 1.95 12771 

18 SHARON, PA 6 $90.48 47 4.84 12771 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 1 $30.14 1053 1.60 13161 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 2 $30. 14 1053 3.65 13161 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 3 $47.49 363 1.60 13161 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 4 $47.49 363 3.65 13161 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 5 $92.90 479 1.60 13161 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 6 $92.90 479 3.65 13161 

20 SOMERSET, PA 1 $23. 11 305 1.61 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 2 $23. 11 305 4.35 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 3 $31.85 192 1 .61 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 4 $31.85 192 4.35 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 5 $36.10 3 0.81 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 6 $45.42 282 1. 61 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 7 $45.42 282 4.35 13520 

20 SOMERSET, PA 8 $46.77 1 0.81 13520 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 1 $30.25 196 0.60 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 2 $30.25 747 2.05 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 3 $30.25 747 4.83 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 4 $32.80 134 1.03 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 5 $39.99 688 0.60 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 6 $39.99 1851 2.05 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 7 $39.99 1851 4.83 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 8 $39.99 627 1.03 13673 

100 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur end Btu 

content-Continued 

MINING SULF BTU 

SUP COST ( 1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REGION STEP $/TON) ( 1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 9 $53.31 1418 2.05 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 10 $53.31 1418 4.83 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 11 $58.24 506 0.60 13673 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 12 $65.41 465 1.03 13673 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 1 $26.83 394 1. 64 13251 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 2 $26.83 394 4.47 13251 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 3 $45.78 93 1.64 13251 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 4 $45.78 93 4.47 13251 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 5 $82.42 169 1. 64 13251 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 6 $82.42 169 4.47 13251 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 1 $26.55 207 1.03 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 2 $26.73 243 0.61 13714 

23 PHILIPPI. wv 3 $26.73 505 1.90 13714 

23 PHI LIPPI, wv 4 $26.73 505 4. 17 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 5 $39.84 72 1.03 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 6 $40.86 99 0.61 13714 

23 PHILIPPI. wv 7 $40.86 287 1. 90 13714 

23 PHILIPPI. wv 8 $40.86 287 4. 17 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 9 $64. 12 96 0.61 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 10 $64. 12 218 1. 90 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 11 $64. 12 218 4. 17 13714 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 12 $64. 13 102 1.03 13714. 

26 PEORIA, IL 1 $30.70 452 2.85 10632 

26 PEORIA, IL 2 $30.70 452 4.33 10632 

26 PEORIA, IL 3 $39.53 508 2.85 10632 

26 PEORIA, IL 4 $39.53 508 4.33 10632 

26 PEORIA, IL 5 $45.55 830 2.85 10632 

26 PEORIA, IL 6 $45.55 830 4.33 10632 

27 OTTAWA, IL 1 $39.66 389 2.70 10995 

27 OTTAWA, IL 2 $39.66 389 6. 19 10995 

27 OTTAWA, IL 3 $44.03 306 2.70 10995 

27 OTTAWA, IL 4 $44.03 306 6. 19 10995 

27 OTTAWA, IL 5 $60.81 404 2.70 10995 

27 OTTAWA, IL 6 $60.81 404 6. 19 10995 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL $32.58 1825 3.43 10561 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 2 $32.58 1825 4.70 10561 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 3 $38.00 1793 3.43 10561 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 4 $38.00 1793 4.70 10561 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 5 $49.01 1836 3.43 10561 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL G $49.01 1836 4.70 10561 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 1 $25.93 1045 1. 56 11450 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 2 $25.93 1045 4.06 11450 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 3 $30.94 1465 1. 56 11450 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 4 $30.94 1465 4.06 11450 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 5 $42.35 2610 1. 56 11450 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 6 $42.35 2610 4.06 11450 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 1 $27.73 250 1. 55 11063 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 2 $27.73 250 4.27 11063 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 3 $31.58 594 1. 55 11063 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 4 $31.58 594 4.27 11063 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 5 $39.54 789 1. 55 11063 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 6 $39.54 789 4.27 11063 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 1 $30.64 662 1. 38 12396 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 2 $30.64 662 3. 18 12396 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 3 $39.59 745 1.38 12396 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 4 $39.59 745 3. 18 12396 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 5 $51. 10 1386 1. 38 12396 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 6 $51 . 10 1386 3. 18 12396 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 1 $23.26 198 1 .68 11443 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 2 $23.26 198 4.83 11443 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 3 $30.11 345 1.68 11443 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 4 $30. 11 345 4.83 11443 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 5 $41. 13 508 1.68 11443 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 6 $41. 13 508 4.83 11443 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 1 $24.50 901 2.00 11811 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 2 $24.50 901 4.85 11811 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 3 $31.27 390 2.00 11811 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 4 $31.27 390 4.85 11811 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 5 $40.75 1640 2.00 11811 

33 MORGANFIELD. KY 6 $40.75 1640 4.85 11811 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 1 $26. 10 937 2.00 12215 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 2 $26. 10 937 4.85 12215 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 3 $34.37 849 2.00 12215 

34 MAD! SONVI LLE, KY 4 $34.37 849 4.85 12215 

Tatles 101 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur and Btu 

content-Continued 

MINING SULF- BTU 

SUP COST (1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REGION STEP $/TON) ( 1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 5 $54.58 1643 2.00 12215 

34 MAOISONVILLE, KY 6 $54.58 1643 4.85 12215 

37 MARSHALL, TX 1 $11.92 147 0. 73 6200 

37 MARSHALL, TX 2 $11.92 147 1. 44 6200 

37 MARSHALL, TX 3 $16.40 274 0. 73 6200 

37 MARSHALL, TX 4 $16.40 274 1. 44 6200 

37 MARSHALL, TX 5 $22.52 483 0. 73 6200 

37 MARSHALL, TX 6 $22.52 483 1. 44 6200 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 1 $11 .80 384 0.61 6200 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 2 $11.80 384 1. 31 6200 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 3 $17.88 342 0.61 6200 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 4 $17.88 342 1. 31 6200 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 5 $32.93 888 0.61 6200 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 6 $32.93 888 1. 31 6200 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 1 $13.02 367 0.77 7000 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 2 $13.02 367 1. 17 7000 

39 FAIRFIELO, TX 3 $21.10 584 0. 77 7000 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 4 $21.10 58"4 1. 17 7000 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 5 $36.36 1164 0. 77 7000 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 6 $36.36 1164 1. 17 7000 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 1 $12.22 161 0. 79 6200 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 2 $12.22 161 1. 79 6200 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 3 $19. 14 200 0. 79 6200 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 4 $19. 14 200 1. 7.9 6200 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 5 $29.59 540 0. 79 6200 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 6 $29.59 540 1. 79 6200 

43 POTEAU, OK 1 $23.93 51 2.02 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 2 $23.93 51 6. 17 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 3 $30.05 11 0.65 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 4 $33.71 100 2.02 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 5 $33.71 100 6. 17 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 6 $34.67 10 0.65 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 7 $45.90 170 2.02 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 8 $45.90 170 6. 17 13488 

43 POTEAU, OK 9 $55.53 25 0.65 13488 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 1 $36.97 47 1. 73 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 2 $36.97 47 4.97 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 3 $38.05 7 0.64 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 4 $55. 18 4 0.64 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 5 $56.80 18 1. 73 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 6 $56.80 18 4.97 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 7 $81.11 73 1. 73 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 8 $81.11 73 4.97 13059 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 9 $83.80 10 0.64 13059 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 1 $24.23 112 2.78 12153 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 2 $24.23 112 8.36 12153 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 3 $30.30 114 2.78 12153 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 4 $30.30 114 8.36 12153 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 5 $64.80 173 2.78 12153 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 6 $64.80 173 8.36 12153 

48 CLINTON, MO 1 $24.89 249 3. 17 11623 

48 CLINTON, MO 2 $24.89 249 7.05 11623 

48 CLINTON, MO 3 $50.56 183 3. 17 11623 

48 CLINTON, MO 4 $50.56 183 7.05 11623 

48 CLINTON, MO 5 $82.84 177 3. 17 11623 

48 CLINTON, MO 6 $82.84 177 7.05 11623 

49 MACON, MO 1 $29.84 287 3.52 10815 

49 MACON, MO 2 $29.84 287 6.32 10815 

49 MACON, MO 3 $54.56 244 3.52 10815 

49 MACON, MO 4 $54.56 244 6.32 10815 

49 MACON, MO 5 $80.42 333 3.52 10815 

49 MACON, MO 6 $80.42 333 6.32 10815 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 1 $26.60 37 4.91 10471 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 2 $26.60 37 5.09 10471 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 3 $35. 12 87 4.91 10471 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 4 $35. 12 87 5.09 10471 

56 ALBIA, IA 1 $22.65 21 3.33 9959 

56 ALBIA, IA 2 $22 65 21 9.05 9959 

56 ALBIA, lA 3 $26.94 113 3.33 9959 

56 ALBIA, IA 4 $26.94 113 9.05 9959 

56 ALBIA, IA 5 $39.55 292 3.33 9959 

56 ALBIA, IA 6 $39.55 292 9.05 9959 

57 WINSLOW, AZ $16.69 102 0.88 10602 

102 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur and Btu 

content-Continued 

MINING SULF BTU 

SUP COST (1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REGION STEP $/TON) ( 1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

57 WINSLOW, AZ '2 $16.69 102 1. 72 10602 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 3 $18.71 67 0.88 10602 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 4 $18.71 67 1. 72 10602 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 5 $18.93 67 0.52 10602 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 6 $24. 11 67 0.52 10602 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 7 $29.31 134 0.88 10602 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 8 $29.31 134 1 72 10602 

61 RATON, NM 1 $31.54 132 0.56 12332 

61 RATON, NM 2 $31.54 118 0.94 12332 

61 RATON, NM 3 $31.54 118 1.61 12332 

61 RATON, NM 4 $35.44 152 0.56 12332 

61 RATON, NM 5 $35.44 122 0.94 12332 

61 RATON, NM 6 $35.44 122 1. 61 12332 

61 RATON, NM 7 $43.43 189 0.56 12332 

61 RATON, NM 8 $43.43 145 0.94 12332 

61 RATON, NM 9 $43.43 145 1.61 12332 

62 GUNNISON, co 1 $25.24 8 0. 49 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 2 $25.24 8 0.98 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 3 $25.24 8 1. 94 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 4 $32. 11 276 0.49 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 5 $32. 11 286 0.98 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 6 $32. 11 286 1. 94 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 7 $39.87 321 0.49 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 8 $39.87 327 0.98 11700 

62 GUNNISON, co 9 $39.87 327 1. 94 11700 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 1 $43.93 222 0. 46 10989 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 2 $50.50 131 0.88 10989 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 3 $77.87 1?0 0. 46 10989 

66 RAWLINS, WY 1 $18.34 21 0.69 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 2 $18.34 21 1.11 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 3 $18.77 89 0.41 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 4 $23.56 108 0.69 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 5 $23.56 108 1 11 9505 

66 RAW.LINS, WY 6 $26.00 165 0.41 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 7 $33. 11 105 0.69 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 8 $33. 11 105 1.11 9505 

66 RAWLINS, WY 9 $42. 17 193 0.41 9505 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 1 $20. 13 1009 0. 38 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 2 $20. 13 1547 0. 76 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 3 $20. 13 1547 1.60 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 4 $23.84 514 0. 38 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 5 $25.86 1511 0. 76 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 6 $25.86 1511 1.60 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 7 $36.44 2238 0. 38 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 8 $51. 14 2504 0. 76 8572 

67 SHERIDAN &. JOHNSON CTY, WY 9 $51. 14 2504 1.60 8572 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 1 $24.70 96 0.46 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 2 $26.41 353 1. 25 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 3 $26.41 353 3.28 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 4 $35.80 70 0.46 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 5 $39.40 173 1. 25 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 6 $39.40 173 3.28 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 7 $63.87 462 1. 25 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 8 $63.87 462 3.28 10864 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 9 $68.52 161 0. 46 10864 

70 PRICE, UT 1 $26.78 33 0.56 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 2 $26.78 66 1 21 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 3 $26.78 66 2.78 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 4 $29. 19 92 0.56 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 5 $38.41 263 1. 21 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 6 $38.41 263 2.78 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 7 $71.51 51 0.56 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 8 $71.51 30 1. 21 12383 

70 PRICE, UT 9 $71.51 30 2.78 12383 

75 FORSYTH, MT 1 $24.06 48 0.49 10258 

75 FORSYTH. MT 2 $24.06 51 0. 79 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 3 $24.06 51 1.40 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 4 $24.89 57 0.49 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 5 $24.89 60 0. 79 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 6 $24.89 60 1. 40 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 7 $54.58 944 0.49 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 8 $54.58 1038 0. 79 10258 

75 FORSYTH, MT 9 $54.58 1038 1.40 10258 

Ta"les 103 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur and Btu 

content-Continued 

MINING SULF BTU 

SUP COST (1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REGION STEP $/TON) ( 1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

80 MINOT, NO 1 $7. 12 174 0.62 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 2 $7. 12 174 1.40 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 3 $12.58 240 0.62 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 4 $12.58 240 1. 40 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 5 $15.65 78 0.34 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 6 $18.90 51 0. 34 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 7 $25.74 313 0.62 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 8 $25.74 313 1.40 6500 

80 MINOT, NO 9 $27.40 44 0. 34 6500 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 1 $25.38 4 0.45 10796 

87 CENTRAL! A. WA 2 $26. 14 32 1. 17 10796 

87 CENTRAL! A, WA 3 $26. 14 32 2.95 10796 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 4 $26.60 11 0.45 10796 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 5 $40.83 8 1. 17 10796 

87 CENTRAL! A, WA 6 $40.83 8 2.95 10796 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 7 $55.11 64 0.45 10796 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 8 $55.78 211 1. 17 10796 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 9 $55.78 211 2.95 10796 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 1 $16. 16 290 0.44 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 2 $16. 16 575 0.93 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 3 $16.16 575 2. 14 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 4 $24.08 300 0.44 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 5 $24.08 770 0.93 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 6 $24.08 770 2. 14 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 7 $38.65 714 0.44 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 8 $38.65 1379 0.93 9639 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 9 $38.65 1379 2. 14 9639 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 1 $26.27 25 0.52 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 2 $26.27 50 0.95 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 3 $26.27 50 1.86 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 4 $31.52 72 0.52 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 5 $31.52 72 0.95 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 6 $31.52 72 1. 86 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 7 $41.85 58 0.52 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 8 $41.85 90 0.95 11309 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 9 $41.85 90 1.86 11309 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 1 $23.40 418 0.44 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 2 $24. 18 911 1. 12 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 3 $24. 18 911 2.81 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 4 $33.31 192 0.44 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 5 $34.09 383 1. 12 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 6 $34.09 383 2.81 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 7 $53.03 583 0.44 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 8 $53.46 1273 1 . 12 10430 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 9 $53.46 1273 2.81 10430 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY. co $19.49 535 1.00 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 2 $19.49 535 2.23 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 3 $19.70 333 0.45 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 4 $23.57 461 1.00 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 5 $23.57 461 2.23 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 6 $24.24 440 0.45 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 7 $31.05 1149 1.00 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY. co 8 $31.05 1149 2.23 10700 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 9 $32.20 692 0.45 10700 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 1 $30.60 276 0.93 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 2 $30.60 276 2. 14 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 3 $33.06 156 0.41 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 4 $40.02 363 0.93 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 5 $40.02 363 2. 14 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 6 $42.72 211 0.41 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 7 $47.52 483 0.41 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 8 $49.64 821 0.93 9580 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 9 $49.64 821 2. 14 9580 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 1 $10.18 5233 0.40 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 2 $10.26 11792 0.98 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 3 $10.26 11792 2.46 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 4 $14.68 5174 0.40 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN. MT 5 $15.05 13508 0.98 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 6 $15.05 13508 2.46 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 7 $32.75 6933 0.40 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 8 $32.75 15201 0.98 9200 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 9 $32.75 15201 2.46 9200 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 1 $6.08 2378 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 2 $6.23 4758 0.80 8400 

104 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 04. Regional tonnage-cost schedules (base case): fob mining cost versus deliverable tonnage by sulfur and Btu 

content-Continued 

MINING SULF BTU 

SUP COST ( 1985 TONS (% BY (BTU/ 

REG SUPPLY REG-ION STEP $/TON) (1000) WEIGHT) LB) 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 3 $6.23 4758 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 4 $10.02 2582 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 5 $10.48 2850 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 6 $10.48 2850 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 7 $10.71 213 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 8 $10.71 213 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 9 $11.51 125 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 10 $15. 19 223 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 11 $15.19 223 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 12 $17.53 195 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 13 $17.60 1378 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 14 $17.60 1378 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 15 $17.77 732 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 16 $23.78 822 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 17 $23.78 822 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 18 $25.41 2170 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 19 $25.41 3376 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 20 $25.41 3376 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 21 $27.66 721 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN. WY 22 $32.78 339 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 23 $32.78 339 1. 79 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 24 $35.53 161 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN. WY 25 $36.29 544 0.35 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN. WY 26 $36.29 900 0.80 8400 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 27 $36.29 900 1. 79 8400 

97 FORT UNION, MT 1 $14.26 42 0.35 66-45 

97 FORT UNION, MT 2 $14.26 407 0.94 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 3 $14.26 407 2.79 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 4 $14.94 54 0.35 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 5 $14.94 497 0.94 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 6 $14.94 497 2.79 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 7 $18.04 84 0.35 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 8 $18.04 802 0.94 6645 

97 FORT UNION, MT 9 $18.04 802 2.79 6645 

98 FORT UNION, NO 1 $7.02 1637 o.so 6500 

98 FORT UNION. NO 2 $7.02 1637 2.21 6500 

98 FORT UNION, NO 3 $8. 15 179 0.34 6500 

98 FORT UNION, NO 4 $9.07 1327 0.80 6500 

98 FORT UNION, ND 5 $9.07 1327 2.21 6500 

98 FORT UNION, NO 6 $10.37 266 0.34 6500 

98 FORT UNION, ND 7 $14.24 2645 0.80 6500 

98 FORT UNION, NO 8 $14.24 2645 2.21 6500 

98 FORT UNION, NO 9 $15.82 280 0.34 6500 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 1 $34.60 30 0."73 9771 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 2 $34.83 121 0.44 9771 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 3 $35.29 30 0. 73 9771 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 4 $39.73 181 0.44 9771 

Ta~les 105 
Table El. SOx discharge limits for coal-fired boilers 

A. Electric Utility Boilers 

State Implementation Plans (SIP) Standards 

o Boilers with construction start-up dates earlier than August 1971 are 

required to meet SIP standards set by individual states. SIPs are 

established by States to meet national ambient air quality standards set 

in the Federal Clean Air Act. SIP standards vary by State and by boiler 

within State. 

o Any method of compliance is allowed, including low-sulfur coal, SOX 

scrubbing, and combinations thereof. 

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) 

o Boilers with construction start-up dates after August 1971 and before 

October 1978 are required to meet a Federal SOX discharge standard of 1.2 

lbs of so2 per million btu heat input. Any method of compliance is 

allowed, Including low-sulfur coal, SOX scrubbing, and combinations 

thereof. 

Revised New Source Performance Standards (RNSPS) 

o Boilers with construction start-up dates after October 1978 are required 

by Federal Regulation to apply flue gas desulfurization technology 

(currently SOX scurbbing) to remove a minimum of 70% of so2 from the 

boiler flue gas. Scrubbing at less than 90% (but no less than at 70%) is 

allowed if a discharge standard of 0.6 lbs of S02s per million btu heat 

input can be met. If the scrubbing removal level is 90% or higher, 

boilers are allowed to discharge 1.2 lbs of so2 per million btu heat 

input. 

B. Industrial Boilers 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Standards 

o Boilers on-line prior to 1985 are required to meet SIP standards set by 

individual states. 

o Small boilers (heat input not more than 25,000 tons of coal per year 

containing 24 million btu per ton) are required to meet SIP standards in 

all years. Applies to small boilers on-line prior to 1985 and small 

boilers on-line after 1985. 

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) 

o Large boilers, on line after 1985, are required to meet a Federal SOX 

discharge standard of 1.2 lbs of so2 per million btu heat input. Large 

boilers are defined as boilers with a heat input greater than 25,000 tons 

of coal per year containing 24 million btu per ton. Any method of 

compliance is allowed, including low sulfur coal, SOX scrubbing, and 

combinations thereof. 

106 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table E2. Cost factors for estimating SOx scrubbing costs 

Capital Costs (1985 mills/kwh) 

% of 0 lbs of 2 lbs of 4 lbs of 6 lbs of 8 lbs of 9 lbs of 

Gas Flow SOX per SOX per SOX per SOX per SOX per sor per 

Coal Stream Million Btu Million Btu Million Btu Million Btu Million Btu Million Btu 

Type Treated Scrubbed Out Scrubbed Out Scrubbed Out Scrubbed Out Scrubbed Out Scrubbed. Out 

Bit. 80 4.05 4.22 4.39 4.53 4.65 4.72 

Bit. 90 4.48 4.67 4.86 5.02 5.17 5.26 

Bit. 100 5.00 5.21 5.41 5.57 5.74 5.83 

Subbit. 80 4.10 4.27 4.45 4.58 4.71 4.77 

Subbit. 90 4.57 4.74 4.91 5.07 5.22 5.31 

Subbit. 100 5.09 5.28 5.47 5.64 5.80 5.88 

Lig. 80 4.20 4.38 4.55 4. 71 4.84 4.91 

Lig. 90 4.81 5.00 5.19 5.35 5.48 5.55 

Lig. 100 5.22 5.43 5.64 5.80 5.97 6.05 

Operating and Maintenance Cost (1985 mills/kwh) 

Bit. 80 2.25 2.87 3.49 4.10 4.71 5.02 

Bit. 90 2.44 3.15 3.86 4.53 5.22 5.57 

Bit. 100 2.68 3.48 4.27 5.05 5.76 6.12 

Subbit. 80 2.25 2.89 3.53 4.13 4.74 5.05 

Subbit. 90 2.47 3.18 3.89 4.58 5.26 5.61 

Subbit. 100 2.73 3.51 4.29 5.05 5.81 6.19 

Lig. 80 2.32 2.96 3.60 4.22 4.84 5.16 

Lig. 90 2.61 3.32 4.03 4.74 5.43 5.96 

Lig. 100 2.84 3.62 4.39 5.17 5.95 6.35 

Capacity Penalty (% Generating Capacity Derated) 

Bit. 80 2.09 2.12 2.15 2.17 2.19 2.20 

Bit. 90 2.37 2.39 2.41 2.44 2.47 2.49 

Bit. 100 2.65 2.65 2.62 2.62 2.74 2.80 

Subbit. 80 2.13 2.16 2.19 2.21 2.24 2.25 

Subbit. 90 2.40 2.43 2.46 2.49 2.51 2.53 

Subbit. 100 2.67 2.70 2.73 2. 76 2.79 2.81 

Lig. 80 2.25 2.27 2.29 2.32 2.34 2.35 

Lig. 90 2.52 2.55 2.58 2.61 2.63 2.65 

Lig. 100 2.81 2.84 2.87 2.90 2.93 2.95 

Energy Penalty (% of Generating Unit Output Used by Scrubber) 

Bit. 80 2.56 2.55 2.57 2.60 2.62 2.63 

Bit. 90 3.40 3.43 3.46 3.48 3.51 3.53 

Bit. 100 4.26 4.2226 4.23 4.23 4.35 4.35 

Sub bit. 80 2.58 . 2.60 2.62 2.65 2.67 2.68 

Subbit. 90 3.46 3.49 3.52 3.55 3.57 3.58 

Sub bit. 100 4.30 4.33 4.36 4.39 4.42 4.44 

Lig. 80 2.25 2.77 2.80 2.82 2.85 2.87 

Lig. 90 3.63 3.65 3.67 3.70 3.73 3.75 

Lig. 100 4.49 4.52 4.55 4.58 4.61 ~.63 

Table!' 107 
Table E3. SOx scrubbing costs for each step on the coal resource tonnage-cost schedule 

LO NSPS DIS LO NSPS REM LO CST HI NSPS DIS HI NSPS REM HI CST RNSPS DIS RN>PS REM RNSPS CST SUP (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LE''EL ( 1985 REG N SUPPLY REGION STEP MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 1 0.58 78.0 $30.97 0.30 90.0 $35.43 0.58 78.0 $30.97 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 2 0.60 89.0 $39.01 0.50 90.0 $39.08 0.60 89.0 $39.01 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 3 0.30 70.0 $25.67 0.10 90.0 $33.24 0.30 70.0 $25.67 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 0.45 70.0 $26.11 0.20 90.0 $33.93 0.45 70.0 $26. 11 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5 0.58 78.0 $30.97 0.30 90.0 $35.43 0.58 78.0 $30.97 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 6 0.60 89.0 $39.01 0.50 90.0 $39.08 0.60 89.0 $39.01 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7 0 30 70.0 $25.67 0.10 90.0 $33.24 0.30 70.0 $25.67 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 8 0.45 70.0 $26.11 0.20 90.0 $33.93 0.45 70.0 $26. 11 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 9 0.58 78.0 $30.97 0.30 90.0 $35.43 0.58 78.0 $30.97 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 10 0.60 89.0 $39.01 0.50 90.0 $39.08 0.60 89.0 $39.01 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 11 0.30 70.0 $25.67 0.10 90.0 $33.24 0.30 70.0 $25.67 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 12 0.45 70.0 $26.11 0.20 90.0 $33.93 0.45 70.0 $26.11 

4 JASPER, TN 1 0.45 70.0 $26.16 0.10 90.0 $33.99 0.45 70.0 $26.16 

4 JASPER, TN 2 0.60 78.0 $31.13 0.30 90.0 $35.62 0.60 78.0 $31.13 

4 JASPER, TN 3 0.58 90.0 $39.64 0.60 90.0 $39.64 0.58 90.0 $39.64 

4 JASPER, TN 4 0.29 70.0 $25.71 0.10 90.0 $33.28 0.29 70.0 $25.71 

4 JASPER, TN 5 0.45 70.0 $26. 16 0.10 90.0 $33.99 0.45 70.0 $26.16 

4 JASPER, TN 6 0.60 78.0 $31. 13 0.30 90.0 $35.62 0.60 78.0 $31.13 

4 JASPER, TN 7 0.58 90.0 $39.64 0.60 90.0 $39.64 0.58 90.0 $39.64 

4 JASPER, TN 8 0. 29 70.0 $25.71 0.10 90.0 $33.28 0.29 70.0 $25.71 

4 JASPER, TN 9 0.45 10.0 $26. 16 0.10 90.0 $33.99 0.45 70.0 $26.16 

4 JASPER, TN 10 0.29 70.0 $25.71 0.10 90.0 $33.28 0.29 70.0 $25.71 

4 JASPER, TN 11 0.60 78.0 $31. 13 0.30 90.0 $35.62 0.60 78.0 $31. 13 

4 JASPER, TN 12 0.58 90.0 $39.64 0.60 90.0 $39.64 0.58 90.0 $39.64 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 1 0.29 70.0 $25.83 0.10 90.0 $33.44 0.29 70.0 $25.83 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 2 0.58 74.0 $27.01 0.20 90.0 $35. 16 0.58 74.0 $27.01 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 3 0.58 90.0 $39.75 0.60 90.0 $39.75 0.58 90.0 $39.75 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 4 0.29 70.0 $25.83 0.10 90.0 $33.44 0.29 70.0 $25.83 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 5 0.58 74.0 $27.01 0.20 90.0 $35.16 0.58 74.0 $27.01 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 6 0.58 90.0 $39.75 0.60 90.0 $39.75 0.58 90.0 $39.75 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 7 0.29 70.0 $25.83 0.10 90.0 $33.44 0.29 70.0 $25.83 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 8 0.58 74.0 $27.01 0.20 90.0 $35.16 0.58 74.0 $27.01 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 9 0.58 90.0 $39.75 0.60 90.0 $39.75 0.58 90.0 $39.75 

8 LEBANON, VA 1 0.57 79.0 $32.10 0.30 90.0 $36.69 0.57 79.0 $32.10 

8 LEBANON, VA 2 0.59 90.0 $40.93 0.60 90.0 $40.93 0.59 90.0 $40.93 

8 LEBANON, VA 3 0.27 70.0 $26.39 0.10 90.0 $34. 14 0.27 70.0 $26.39 

8 LEBANON, VA 4 0.45 70.0 $26.92 0.20 90.0 $34.98 0.45 70.0 $26.92 

LEBANON, VA 5 0.45 70.0 $26.92 0.20 90.0 $34.98 0.45 70.0 $26.92 

LEBANON, VA 6 0.57 79.0 $32.10 0.30 90.0 $36.69 0.57 79.0 $32.10 

LEBANON, VA 7 0.59 90.0 $40.93 0.60 90.0 $40.93 0.59 90.0 $40.93 

LEBANON, VA 8 0.27 70.0 $26.39 0.10 90.0 $34.14 0.27 70.0 $26.39 

LEBANON, VA 9 0.45 70.0 $26.92 0.20 90.0 $34.98 0.45 70.0 $26.92 

LEBANON, VA 10 0.57 79.0 $32.10 0.30 90.0 $36.69 0.57 79.0 $32.10 

LEBANON, VA 11 0.59 90.0 $40.93 0.60 90.0 $40.93 0.59 90.0 $40.93 

LEBANON, VA 12 0.27 70.0 $26.39 0.10 90.0 $34.14 0.27 70.0 $26.39 

PIKEVILLE, KY 1 0.22 70.0 $26.08 0.10 90.0 $33.70 0.22 70.0 $26.08 

PIKEVILLE, KY 2 0.45 70.0 $26.73 0.10 90.0 $34.74 0.45 70.0 $26.73 

PIKEVILLE, KY 3 0.60 80.0 $32. 19 0.30 90.0 $36.76 0.60 80.0 $32.19 

PIKEVILLE, KY 4 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 5 0.60 80.0 $32.19 0.30 90.0 $36.76 0.60 80.0 $32.19 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 6 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 7 0.22 70.0 $26.08 0.10 90.0 $33.70 0.22 70.0 $26.08 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 8 0.45 70.0 $26.73 0.10 90.0 $34.74 0.45 70.0 $26.73 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 9 0.60 80.0 $32. 19 0.30 90.0 $36.76 0.60 80.0 $32.19 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 10 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 0. 70 90.0 $42.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 11 0.22 70.0 $26.08 0.10 90.0 $33.70 0.22 70.0 $26.08 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 12 0.45 70.0 $26.73 0.10 90.0 $34.74 0.45 70.0 $26.73 

10 MIOOLESBORO, KY 1 0.29 70.0 $26.02 0.10 90.0 $33.67 0.29 70.0 $26.02 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 2 0.57 81.0 $31.96 0.30 90.0 $36.45 0.57 81.0 $31.96 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 3 0.71 90.0 $41.81 0. 70 90.0 $41.81 0.71 90.0 $41.81 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 4 0.45 70.0 $26.48 0.10 90.0 $34.41 0.45 70.0 $26.48 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 5 0.29 70.0 $26.02 0.10 90.0 $33.67 0.29 70.0 $26.02 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 6 0.57 81.0 $31.96 0.30 90.0 $36.45 0.57 81.0 $31.96 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 7 0.71 90.0 $41.81 o. 70 90.0 $41.81 0.71 90.0 $41 .81 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 8 0.45 70.0 $26.48 0.10 90.0 $34.41 0.45 70.0 $26.48 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 9 0.29 70.0 $26.02 0.10 90.0 $33.67 0.29 70.0 $26.02 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 10 0.45 70.0 $26.48 0.10 90.0 $34.41 0.45 70.0 $26.48 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 11 0.57 81.0 $31.96 0.30 90.0 $36.45 0.57 81.0 $31.96 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 12 0.71 90.0 $41.81 0. 70 90.0 $41.81 0.71 90.0 $41.81 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 1 0.59 70.0 $24.74 0.20 90.0 $32.27 0.59 70.0 $24.74 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 2 0.56 88.0 $35.45 0.50 90.0 $35.57 0.56 88.0 $35.45 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 3 0.30 70.0 $23.97 0.10 90.0 $31.04 0.30 70.0 $23.97 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 4 0.30 70.0 $23.97 0.10 90.0 $31.04 0.30 70.0 $23.97 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 5 0.59 70.0 $24.74 0.20 90.0 $32.27 0.59 70.0 $24.74 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 6 0.56 88.0 $35.45 0.50 90.0 $35.57 0.56 88.0 $35.45 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 7 0.30 70.0 $23.97 0.10 90.0 $31.04 0.30 70.0 $23.97 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 8 0.59 70.0 $24.74 0.20 90.0 $32.27 0.59 70.0 $24.74 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 9 0.56 88.0 $35.45 0.50 90.0 $35.57 0.56 88.0 $35.45 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 1 0.58 76.0 $25. 19 0.20 90.0 $32.74 0.58 76.0 $25. 19 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 2 0.65 90.0 $37.68 0. 70 90.0 $37.68 0.65 90.0 $37.68 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 3 0. 35 70.0 $24.06 0.10 90.0 $31.19 0.35 70.0 $24.06 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 4 0.35 70.0 $24.06 0.10 90.0 $31.19 0.35 70.0 $24.06 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 5 0.58 76.0 $25.19 0.20 90.0 $32.74 0.58 76.0 $25.19 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 6 0.65 90.0 $37.68 o. 70 90.0 $37.68 0.65 90.0 $37.68 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 7 0.35 70.0 $24.06 0.10 90.0 $31.19 0.35 70.0 $24.06 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 8 0.58 76.0 $25.19 0.20 90.0 $32.74 0.58 76.0 $25.19 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 9 0.65 90.0 $37.68 o. 70 90.0 $37.68 0.65 90.0 $37.68 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 1 0.56 86.0 $33.52 0.40 90.0 $33.73 0.56 86.0 $33.52 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 2 1.18 90.0 $40.64 1.20 90.0 $40.64 1.18 90.0 $40.64 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 3 0.56 86.0 $33.52 0.40 90.0 $33.73 0.56 86.0 $33.52 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 4 1.18 90.0 $40.64 1.20 90.0 $40.64 1.18 90.0 $40.64 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 5 0.56 86.0 $33.52 0.40 90.0 $33.73 0.56 86.0 $33.52 

108 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table E3. SOx scrubbing costs for each step on the coal resource tonnage-cost schedule-Continued 

LO NSPS DIS LO NSPS REM LO CST HI NSPS DIS HI NSPS REM HI CST RNSPS DIS RNSPS REM Rf''iPS CST 

SUP (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL ( 1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 

REG N SUPPLY REGION STEP MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 6 1.18 90.0 $40.64 1.20 90.0 $40.64 1. 18 90.0 $40.64 

14 CADIZ, OH 1 0.57 85.0 $30.16 0.40 90.0 $34.21 0.57 85.0 $30.16 

14 CADIZ, OH 2 1.12 90.0 $41.61 1.10 90.0 $41.61 1.12 90.0 $41.61 

14 CADIZ, OH 3 0.57 85.0 $30.16 0.40 90.0 $34.21 0.57 85.0 $30.16 

14 CADIZ, OH 4 1. 12 90.0 $41.61 1.10 90.0 $41.61 1. 12 90.0 $41.61 

14 CADIZ, OH 5 0.57 85.0 $30.16 0.40 90.0 $34.21 0.57 85.0 $30.16 

14 CADIZ, OH 6 1. 12 90.0 $41.61 1.10 90.0 $41.61 1.12 90.0 $41.61 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 1 0.57 85.0 $30.24 0.40 90.0 $34.30 0.57 85.0 $30.24 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 2 1. 11 90.0 $41.75 1.10 90.0 $41.75 1. 11 90.0 $41.75 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 3 0.57 85.0 $30.24 0.40 90.0 $34.30 0.57 85.0 $30.24 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 4 1.11 90.0 $41.75 1.10 90.0 $41.75 1.11 90.0 $41.75 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 5 0.57 85.0 $30.24 0.40 90.0 $34.30 0.57 85.0 $30.24 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 6 1.11 90.0 $41.75 1.10 90.0 $41.75 1.11 90.0 $41.75 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 1 0.58 79.0 $31.05 0.30 90.0 $35.49 0.58 79.0 $31.05 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 2 0.69 90.0 $40.85 0.70 90.0 $40.85 0.69 90.0 $40.85 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 3 0.58 79.0 $31.05 0.30 90.0 $35.49 0.58 79.0 $31.05 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 4 0.69 90.0 $40.85 0.70 90.0 $40.85 0.69 90.0 $40.85 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 5 0.58 79.0 $31.05 0.30 90.0 $35.49 0.58 79.0 $31.05 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 6 0.69 90.0 $40.85 0.70 90.0 $40.85 0.69 90.0 $40.85 

17 KITTANNING, PA 1 0.59 80.0 $32.02 0.30 90.0 $36.57 0.59 80.0 $32.02 

17 KITTANNING, PA 2 0.80 90.0 $43.19 0.80 90.0 $43.19 0.80 90.0 $43.19 

17 KITTANNING, PA 3 0.59 80.0 $32.02 0.30 90.0 $36.57 0.59 80.0 $32.02 

17 KITTANNING, PA 4 0.80 90.0 $43.19 0.80 90.0 $43.19 0.80 90.0 $43.19 

17 KITTANNING, PA 5 0.59 80.0 $32.02 0.30 90.0 $36.57 0.59 80.0 $32.02 

17 KITTANNING, PA 6 0.80 90.0 $43.19 0.80 90.0 $43.19 0.80 90.0 $43.19 

18 SHARON, PA 1 0.58 81.0 $30.56 0.30 90.0 $34.86 0.58 81.0 $30.56 

18 SHARON, PA 2 0.76 90.0 $40.51 0.80 90.0 $40.51 0.76 90.0 $40.51 

18 SHARON, PA 3 0.58 81.0 $30.56 0.30 90.0 $34.86 0.58 81.0 $30.56 

18 SHARON, PA 4 0.76 90.0 $40.51 0.80 90.0 $40.51 0.76 90.0 $40.51 

18 SHARON, PA 5 0.58 81.0 $30.56 0.30 90.0 $34.86 0.58 81.0 $30.56 

18 SHARON, PA 6 0.76 90.0 $40.51 0.80 90.0 $40.51 0.76 90.0 $40.51 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 1 0.58 76.0 $27.01 0.20 90.0 $35.11 0.58 76.0 $27'.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 2 0.55 90.0 $39.13 0.60 90.0 $39.13 0.55 90.0 $39.13 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 3 0.58 76.0 $27.01 0.20 90.0 $35.11 0.58 76.0 $27.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 4 0.55 90.0 $39.13 0.60 90.0 $39.13 0.55 90.0 $39.13 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 5 0.58 76.0 $27.01 0.20 90.0 $35.11 0.58 76.0 $27.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 6 0.55 90.0 $39. 13 0.60 90.0 $39.13 0.55 90.0 $39.13 

20 SOMERSET, PA 1 0.60 75.0 $27.67 0.20 90.0 $36.00 0.60 75.0 $27.67 

20 SOMERSET, PA 2 0.64 90.0 $41.34 0.60 90.0 $41.34 0.64 90.0 $41.34 

20 SOMERSET, PA 3 0.60 75.0 $27.67 0.20 90.0 $36.00 0.60 75.0 $27.67 

20 SOMERSET, PA 4 0.64 90.0 $41.34 0.60 90.0 $41.34 0.64 90.0 $41.34 

20 SOMERSET, PA 5 0.36 70.0 $26.50 0.10 90.0 $34.37 0.36 70.0 $26.50 

20 SOMERSET, PA 6 0.60 75.0 $27.67 0.20 90.0 $36.00 0.60 75.0 $27.67 

20 SOMERSET, PA 7 0.64 90.0 $41.34 0.60 90.0 $41.34 0.64 90.0 $41.34 

20 SOMERSET, PA 8 0.36 70.0 $26.50 0.10 90.0 $34.37 0.36 70.0 $26.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 1 0.26 70.0 $26.52 0.10 90.0 $34.31 0.26 70.0 $26.52 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 2 0.60 80.0 $32.62 0.30 90.0 $37.25 0.60 80.0 $32.62 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 3 0.71 90.0 $42.66 o. 70 90.0 $42.66 0.71 90.0 $42.66 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 4 0.45 70.0 $27.07 0.20 90.0 $35.19 0.45 70.0 $27.07 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 5 0.26 70.0 $26.52 0.10 90.0 $34.31 0.26 70.0 $26.52 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 6 0.60 80.0 $32.62 0.30 90.0 $37.25 0.60 80.0 $32.62 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 1 0.71 90.0 $42.66 0.70 90.0 $42.66 0.71 90.0 $42.66 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 8 0.45 70.0 $27.07 0.20 90.0 $35.19 0.45 70.0 $27.07 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 9 0.60 80.0 $32.62 0.30 90.0 $37.25 0.60 80.0 $32.62 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 10 0.71 90.0 $42.66 0.70 90.0 $42.66 0.71 90.0 $42.66 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 11 0.26 70.0 $26.52 0.10 90.0 $34.31 0.26 70.0 $26.52 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 12 0.45 70.0 $27.07 0.20 90.0 $35.19 0.45 70.0 $27.07 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 1 0.59 76.0 $27.24 0.20 90.0 $35.41 0.59 76.0 $27.24 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 2 0.67 90.0 $40.92 o. 70 90.0 $40.92 0.67 90.0 $40.92 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 3 0.59 76.0 $27.24 0.20 90.0 $35.41 0.59 76.0 $27.24 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 4 0.67 90.0 $40.92 0.70 90.0 $40.92 0.67 90.0 $40.92 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 5 0.59 76.0 $27.24 0.20 90.0 $35.41 0.59 76.0 $27.24 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 6 0.67 90.0 $40.92 0.70 90.0 $40.92 0.67 90.0 $40.92 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 1 0.45 70.0 $27.15 0.20 90.0 $35.29 0.45 70.0 $27.15 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 2 0.27 70.0 $26.61 0.10 90.0 $34.43 0.27 70.0 $26.61 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 3 0.58 79.0 $32.41 0.30 90.0 $37.05 0.58 79.0 $32.41 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 4 0.61 90.0 $41.48 0.60 90.0 $41.48 0.61 90.0 $41.48 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 5 0.45 70.0 $27.15 0.20 90.0 $35.29 0.45 70.0 $27.15 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 6 0.27 70.0 $26.61 0.10 90.0 $34.43 0.27 70.0 $26.61 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 1 0.58 79.0 $32.41 0.30 90.0 $37.05 0.58 79.0 $32.41 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 8 0.61 90.0 $41.48 0.60 90.0 $41.48 0.61 90.0 $41.48 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 9 0.27 70.0 $26.61 0.10 90.0 $34.43 0.27 70.0 $26.61 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 10 0.58 79.0 $32.41 0.30 90.0 $37.05 0.58 79.0 $32.41 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 11 0.61 90.0 $41.48 0.60 90.0 $41.48 0.61 90.0 $41.48 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 12 0.45 70.0 $27.15 0.20 90.0 $35.29 0.45 70.0 $27.15 

26 PEORIA, IL 1 0.59 89.0 $32.33 0.50 90.0 $32.40 0.59 89.0 $32.33 

26 PEORIA, IL 2 0.81 90.0 $35.32 o.8o 90.0 $35.32 0.81 90.0 $35.32 

26 PEORIA, IL 3 0.59 89.0 $32.33 0.50 90.0 $32.40 0.59 89.0 $32.33 

26 PEORIA, IL 4 0.81 90.0 $35.32 0.80 90.0 $35.32 0.81 90.0 $35.32 

26 PEORIA, IL 5 0.59 89.0 $32.33 0.50 90.0 $32.40 0.59 89.0 $32.33 

26 PEORIA, IL 6 0.81 90.0 $35.32 0.80 90.0 $35.32 0.81 90.0 $35.32 

27 OTTAWA, IL 1 0.59 88.0 $32.89 0.50 90.0 $33.01 0.59 88.0 $32.89 

27 OTTAWA, IL 2 1.13 90.0 $38.55 1.10 90.0 $38.55 1.13 90.0 $38.55 

27 OTTAWA, IL 3 0.59 88.0 $32.8.9 0.50 90.0 $33.01 0.59 88.0 $32.89 

27 OTTAWA, IL 4 1.13 90.0 $38.55 1.10 90.0 $38.55 1.13 90.0 $38.55 

27 OTTAWA, IL 5 0.59 88.0 $32.89 0.50 90.0 $33.01 0.59 88.0 $32.89 

27 OTTAWA, IL 6 1.13 90.0 $38.55 1.10 90.0 $38.55 1.13 90.0 $38.55 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 1 0.65 90.0 $33.37 0.60 90.0 $33.37 0.65 90.0 $33.37 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 2 0.89 90.0 $35.86 0.90 90.0 $35.86 0.89 90.0 $35.86 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 3 0.65 90.0 $33.37 0.60 90.0 $33.37 0.65 90.0 $33.37 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 4 0.89 90.0 $35.86 0.90 90.0 $35.86 0.89 90.0 $35.86 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 5 0.65 90.0 $33.37 0.60 90.0 $33.37 0.65 90.0 $33.37 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 6 0.89 90.0 $35.86 0.90 90.0 $35.86 0.89 90.0 $35.86 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 1 0.60 78.0 $27.82 0.30 90.0 $31.81 0.60 78.0 $27.82 

Table~ 109 
Table E3. SOx scrubbing costs for each step on the coal resource tonnage-cost schedule-Continued 

LO NSPS DIS LO NSPS REM LO CST HI NSPS DIS HI NSPS REM HI CST RNSPS DIS RNS~S REM RNSPS CST 

SUP (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVI:L (1985 

REG II SUPPLY REGION STEP MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 2 0.71 90.0 $36.85 0. 70 90.0 $36.85 0.71 90.0 $36.85 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 3 0.60 78.0 $27.82 0.30 90.0 $31.81 0.60 78.0 $27.B2 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 4 0.71 90.0 $36.85 0. 70 90.0 $36.85 0.71 90.0 $36.85 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 5 0.60 78.0 $27.82 0.30 90.0 $31.81 0.60 78.0 $27.82 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 6 0.71 90.0 $36.85 0. 70 90.0 $36.85 0.71 90.0 $36.85 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 1 0.59 79.0 $26.98 0.30 90.0 $30.83 0.59 79.0 $26.98 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 2 0.77 90.0 $36.29 0.80 90.0 $36.29 0.77 90.0 $36.29 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 3 0.59 79.0 $26.98 0.30 90.0 $30.83 0.59 79.0 $26.98 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 4 0. 77 90.0 $36.29 0.80 90.0 $36.29 0.77 90.0 $36.29 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 5 0.59 79.0 $26.98 0.30 90.0 $30.83 0.59 79.0 $26.98 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 6 0. 77 90.0 $36.29 0.80 90.0 $36.29 o. 77 90.0 $36.29 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 1 0.58 74.0 $25.21 0.20 90.0 $32.81 0.58 74.0 $25.21 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 2 0.56 89.0 $36.30 0.50 90.0 $36.37 0.56 89.0 $36.30 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 3 0.58 74.0 $25.21 0.20 90.0 $32.81 0.58 74.0 $25.21 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 4· 0.56 89.0 $36.30 0.50 90.0 $36.37 0.56 89.0 $36.30 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 5 0.58 74.0 $25.21 0.20 90.0 $32.81 0.58 74.0 $25.21 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 6 0.56 89.0 $36.30 0.50 90.0 $36.37 0.56 89.0 $36.30 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 1 0.59 80.0 $28.07 0.30 90.0 $32.04 0.59 80.0 $28.07 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 2 0.84 90.0 $38.34 0.80 90.0 $38.34 0.84 90.0 $38.34 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 3 0.59 80.0 $28.07 0.30 90.0 $32.04 0.59 80.0 $28.07 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 4 0.84 90.0 $38.34 0.80 90.0 $38.34 0.84 90.0 $38.34 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 5 0.59 80.0 $28.07 0.30 90.0 $32.04 0.59 80.0 $28.07 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 6 0.84 90.0 $38.34 0.80 90.0 $38.34 0.84 90.0 $38.34 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 1 0.58 83.0 $29.54 0.30 90.0 $33.62 0.58 83.0 $29.54 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 2 0.82 90.0 $39.31 0.80 90.0 $39.31 0.82 90.0 $39.31 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 3 0.58 83.0 $29.54 0.30 90.0 $33.62 0.58 83.0 $29.54 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 4 0.82 90.0 $39.31 0.80 90.0 $39.31 0.82 90.0 $39.31 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 5 0.58 83.0 $29.54 0.30 90.0 $33.62 0.58 83.0 $29.54 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 6 0.82 90.0 $39.31 0.80 90.0 $39.31 0.82 90.0 $39.31 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 1 0.59 82 .. 0 $29.50 0.30 90.0 $33.61 0.59 82.0 $29.50 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 2 0. 79 90 0 $39.19 0.80 90.0 $39. 19 o. 79 90.0 $39.19 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 3 0.59 82.0 $29.50 0.30 90.0 $33.61 0.59 82.0 $29.50 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 4 0. 79 90.0 $39.19 0.80 90.0 $39.19 o. 79 90.0 $39.19 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 5 0.59 82.0 $29.50 0.30 90.0 $33.61 0.59 82.0 $29.50 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 6 0. 79 90.0 $39. 19 0.80 90.0 $39.19 o. 79 90.0 $39.19 

37 MARSHALL, TX 1 0.59 75 0 $13.50 0.20 90.0 $17.66 0.59 75.0 $13.50 

37 MARSHALL, TX 2 0.56 88.0 $19.09 0.50 90.0 $19.16 0.56 88.0 $19.09 

37 MARSHALL, TX 3 0.59 75.0 $13.50 0.20 90.0 $17.66 0.59 75.0 $13.50 

37 MARSHALL, TX 4 0.56 88.0 $19.09 0.50 90.0 $19.16 0.56 88.0 $19.09 

37 MARSHALL, TX 5 0.59 7'5. 0 $13.50 0.20 90.0 $17.66 0.59 75.0 $13.50 

37 MARSHALL, TX 6 0.56 88.0 $19.09 0.50 90.0 $19. 16 0.56 88.0 $19.09 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 1 0.59 70.0 $13.21 0.20 90.0 $17.41 0.59 70.0 $13.21 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 2 0.59 86.0 $18.76 0.40 90.0 $18.89 0.59 86.0 $18.76 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 3 0.59 70.0 $13.21 0.20 90.0 $17.41 0.59 70.0 $13.21 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 4 0.59 86.0 $18.76 0.40 90.0 $18.89 0.59 86.0 $18.76 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 5 0.59 70.0 $13.21 0.20 90.0 $17.41 0.59 70.0 $13.21 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 6 0.59 86.0 $18.76 0.40 90.0 $18.89 0.59 rG.o $18.76 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 1 0.59 73.0 $15.10 0.20 90.0 $19.83 0.59 73.0 $15.10 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 2 0.57 83.0 $18.43 0.30 90.0 $20.67 0.57 f:l.O $18.43 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 3 0.59 73.0 $15.10 0.20 90.0 $19.83 0.59 73.0 $15.10 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 4 0.57 83.0 $18.43 0.~0 90.0 $20.67 0.57 f3.0 $18.43 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 5 0.59 73.0 $15.10 0.20 90.0 $19.83 0.59 1'3.0 $15.10 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 6 0.57 83.0 $18.43 0.30 90.0 $20.67 0.57 E'3.0 $18.43 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 1 0.59 77.0 $15.79 0.30 90.0 $17.79 0.59 n.o $15.79 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 2 0.58 90.0 $19.86 0.60 90.0 $19.86 0.58 50.0 $19.86 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 3 0.59 77.0 $15.79 0.30 90.0 $17.79 0.59 77.0 $15.79 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 4 0.58 90.0 $19.86 0.60 90.0 $19.86 0.58 90.0 $19.86 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 5 0.59 77.0 $15.79 0.30 90.0 $17.79 0.59 77.0 $15.79 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 6 0.58 90.0 $19.86 0.60 90.0 $19.86 0.58 90.0 $19.86 

43 POTEAU, OK 1 0.60 80.0 $32. 17 0.30 90.0 $36.74 0.60 8"1.0 $32. 17 

43 POTEAU, OK 2 0.91 90.0 $44.90 0.90 90.0 $44.90 0.91 9'1.0 $44.90 

43 POTEAU, OK 3 0.29 70.0 $26.24 0.10 90.0 $33.96 0.29 7"1.0 $26.24 

43 POTEAU, OK 4 0.60 80.0 $32.17 0.30 90.0 $36.74 0.60 8"1.0 $32.17 

43 POTEAU, OK 5 0.91 90.0 $44.90 0.90 90.0 $44.90 0.91 9"1.0 $44.90 

43 POTEAU, OK 6 0.29 70.0 $26.24 0.10 90.0 $33.96 0.29 7"1.0 $26.24 

43 POTEAU, OK 7 0.6'0 80.0 $32. 17 0.30 90.0 $36.74 0.60 8"1.0 $32. 17 

43 POTEAU, OK 8 0.91 90.0 $44.90 0.90 90.0 $44.90 0.91 9?.0 $44.90 

43 POTEAU, OK 9 0.29 70.0 $26.24 0.10 90.0 $33.96 0.29 7"1.0 $26.24 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 1 0.58 78.0 $30.70 0.30 90.0 $35.12 0.58 7'1'.0 $30.70 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 2 0. 76 90.0 $41.47 0.80 90.0 $41 .47 0.76 9C'.O $41 .47 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 3 0.29 70.0 $25.42 0.10 90.0 $32.90 0.29 71.0 $25.42 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 4 0.29 70.0 $25.42 0.10 90.0 $32.90 0.29 7?.0 $25.42 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 5 0.58 78.0 $30.70 0.30 90.0 $35.12 0.58 7 .... 0 $30.70 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 6 0. 76 90.0 $41.47 0.80 90.0 $41.47 0.76 9').0 $41.47 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 7 0.58 78.0 $30.70 0.30 90.0 $35.12 0.58 7 .... 0 $30.70 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 8 0. 76 90.0 $41.47 0.80 90.0 $41.47 0.76 9').0 $41.47 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 9 0.29 70.0 $25.42 0.10 90.0 $32.90 0.29 7•').0 $25.42 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 1 0.59 87.0 $34.83 0.50 90.0 $35.01 0.59 87.0 $34.83 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 3 0.59 87.0 $34.83 0.50 90.0 $35.01 0.59 87.0 $34.83 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 5 0.59 87.0 $34.83 0.50 90.0 $35.01 0.59 87.0 $34.83 

48 CLINTON, MO 1 0.55 90.0 $35.53 0.50 90.0 $35.53 0.55 90.0 $35.53 

48 CLINTON, MO 3 0.55 90.0 $35.53 0.50 90.0 $35.53 0.55 90.0 $35.53 

48 CLINTON, MO 5 0.55 90.0 $35.53 0.50 90.0 $35.53 0.55 90.0 $35.53 

49 MACON, MO 1 0.65 90.0 $34. 19 o. 70 90.0 $34. 19 0.65 91').0 $34.19 

49 MACON, MO 2 1.17 90.0 $37.92 1.20 90.0 $37.92 1 .17 90.0 $37.92 

49 MACON, MO 3 0.65 90.0 $34. 19 0. 70 90.0 $34.19 0.65 91').0 $34.19 

49 MACON, MO 4 1 .17 90.0 $37.92 1.20 90.0 $37.92 1.17 90.0 $37.92 

49 MACON, MO 5 0.65 90.0 $34.19 0. 70 90.0 $34.19 0.65 91'),0 $34.19 

49 MACON, MO 6 1. 17 90.0 $37.92 1.20 90.0 $37.92 1.17 90.0 $37.92 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 1 0.94 90.0 $37.38 0.90 90.0 $37.38 0.94 90.0 $37.38 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 2 0.97 90.0 $37.76 1.00 90.0 $37.76 0.97 90.0 $37.76 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 3 0.94 90.0 $37.38 0.90 90.0 $37.38 0.94 90.0 $37.38 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 4 0.97 90.0 $37.76 1.00 90.0 $37.76 0.97 90.0 $37.76 

56 ALBIA, lA 1 0.67 90.0 $32.81 0. 70 90.0 $32.81 0.67 90.0 $32.81 

56 ALBIA, lA 3 0.67 90.0 $32.81 0. 70 90.0 $32.81 0.67 90.0 $32.81 

110 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table E3. SOx scrubbing costs for each step on the coal resource tonnage-cost schedule-Continued 

LO NSPS DIS LO NSPS REM LO CST HI NSPS DIS HI NSPS REM HI CST RNSPS DIS RNSPS REM R"SPS CST SUP (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 REG If SUPPLY REGION STEP MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $1TON) 

56 ALBIA, lA 5 0.67 90.0 $32.81 0. 70· 90.0 $32.81 0.67 90.0 $32.81 57 WINSLOW, AZ 1 0.50 70.0 $21.68 0.20 90.0 $28.29 0.50 70.0 $21.68 57 WINSLOW, AZ 2 0.58 82.0 $26.35 0.30 90.0 $30.02 0.58 82.0 $26.35 57 WINSLOW, AZ 3 0.50 70.0 $21.68 0.20 90.0 $28.29 0.50 70.0 $21.68 57 WINSLOW, AZ 4 0.58 82.0 $26.35 0.30 90.0 $30.02 0.58 82.0 $26.35 57 WINSLOW, AZ 5 0.29 70.0 $21.19 0.10 90.0 $27.55 0.29 70.0 $21.19 57 WINSLOW, AZ 6 0.29 70.0 $21. 19 0.10 90.0 $27.55 0.29 70.0 $21.19 57 WINSLOW, AZ 7 0.50 70.0 $21.68 0.20 90.0 $28.29 0.50 70.0 $21.68 57 WINSLOW, AZ 8 0.58 82.0 $26.35 0.30 90.0 $30.02 0.58 82.0 $26.35 61 RATON, NM 1 0.27 70.0 $23.95 0.10 90.0 $30.98 0.27 70.0 $23.95 61 RATON, NM 2 0.46 70.0 $24.43 0.20 90.0 $31.76 0.46 70.0 $24.43 61 RATON, NM 3 0.57 78.0 $28.95 0.30 90.0 $33. 12 0.57 78.0 $28.95 61 RATON, NM 4 0.27 70.0 $23.95 0.10 90.0 $30.98 0.27 70.0 $23.95 61 RATON, NM 5 0.46 70.0 $24.43 0.20 90.0 $31.76 0.46 70.0 $24.43 61 RATON, NM 6 0.57 78.0 $28.95 0.30 90.0 $33.12 0.57 78.0 $28.95 61 RATON, NM 7 0.27 70.0 $23.95 0.10 90.0 $30.98 0.27 70.0 $23.95 61 RATON, NM 8 0.46 70.0 $24.43 0.20 90.0 $31.76 0.46 70.0 $24.43 61 RATON, NM 9 0.57 78.0 $28.95 0.30 90.0 $33.12 0.57 78.0 $28.95 62 GUNNISON, co 1 0.25 70.0 $23.28 0.10 90.0 $30.23 0.25 70.0 $23.28 62 GUNNISON, co 2 0.50 70.0 $23.94 0.20 90.0 $31.24 0.50 70.0 $23.94 62 GUNNISON, co 3 0.60 82.0 $29.15 0.30 90.0 $33.22 0.60 82.0 $29.15 62 GUNNISON, co 4 0.25 70.0 $23.28 0.10 90.0 $30.23 0.25 70.0 $23.28 62 GUNNISON, co 5 0.50 70.0 $23.94 0.20 90.0 $31.24 0.50 70.0 $23.94 62 GUNNISON, co 6 0.60 82.0 $29.15 0.30 90.0 $33.22 0.60 82.0 $29.15 62 GUNNISON, co 7 0.25 70.0 $23.28 0.10 90.0 $30.23 0.25 70.0 $23.28 62 GUNNISON, co 8 0.50 70.0 $23.94 0.20 90.0 $31.24 0.50 70.0 $23.94 62 GUNNISON, co 9 0.60 82.0 $29.15 0.30 90.0 $33.22 0.60 82.0 $29.15 63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 1 0.25 70.0 $21.86 0.10 90.0 $28.39 0.25 70.0 $21.86 63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 2 0.48 70.0 $22.43 0.20 90.0 $29.26 0.48 70.0 $22.43 63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 3 0.25 70.0 $21.86 0.10 90.0 $28.39 0.25 70.0 $21.86 66 RAWLINS, WY 1 0.44 70.0 $19.83 0.10 90.0 $26.17 0.44 70.0 $19.83 

66 RAWLINS, WY 2 0.58 75.0 $20.68 0.20 90.0 $27.06 0.58 75.0 $20.68 66 RAWLINS, WY 3 0.26 70.0 $19.35 0.10 90.0 $25.58 0.26 70.0 $19.35 66 RAWLINS, WY 4 0.44 70.0 $19.83 0.10 90.0 $26.17 0.44 70.0 $19.83 66 RAWLINS, WY 5 0.58 75.0 $20.68 0.20 90.0 $27.06 0.58 75.0 $20.68 66 RAWLINS, WY 6 0.26 70.0 $19.35 0.10 90.0 $25.58 0.26 70.0 $19.35 66 RAWLINS, WY 7 0.44 70.0 $19.83 0.10 90.0 $26.17 0.44 70.0 $19.83 66 RAWLINS, WY 8 0.58 75.0 $20.68 0.20 90.0 $27.06 0.58 75.0 $20.68 66 RAWLINS, WY 9 0.26 70.0 $19.35 0.10 90.0 $25.58 0.26 70.0 $19.35 67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 1 0.27 70.0 $17.47 0.10 90.0 $23.09 0.27 70.0 $17.47 67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 2 0.53 70.0 $18.11 0.20 90.0 $23.89 0.53 70.0 $18.11 67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 3 0.60 84.0 $22.90 0.40 90.0 $25.67 0.60 84.0 $22.90 67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 4 0.27 70.0 $17.47 0.10 90.0 $23.09 0.27 70.0 $17.47 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 5 0.53 70.0 $18.11 0.20 90.0 $23.89 0.53 70.0 $18.11 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 6 0.60 84.0 $22.90 0.40 90.0 $25.67 0.60 84.0 $22.90 67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 7 0.27 70.0 $17.47 0.10 90.0 $23.09 0.27 70.0 $17.47 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 8 0.53 70.0 $18.11 0.20 90.0 $23.89 0.53 70.0 $18.11 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 9 0.60 84.0 $22.90 0.40 90.0 $25.67 0.60 84.0 $22.90 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 1 0.25 70.0 $21 .62 0.10 90.0 $28.08 0.25 70.0 $21.62 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 2 0.60 74.0 $22.78 0.20 90.0 $29.71 0.60 74.0 $22.78 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 3 0.60 90.0 $33.84 0.60 90.0 $33.84 0.60 90.0 $33.84 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 4 0.25 70.0 $21.62 0.10 90.0 $28.08 0.25 70.0 $21.62 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 5 0.60 74.0 $22.78 0.20 90.0 $29.71 0.60 74.0 $22.78 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 6 0.60 90.0 $33.84 0.60 90.0 $33.84 0.60 90.0 $33.84 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 7 0.60 74.0 $22.78 0.20 90.0 $29.71 0.60 74.0 $22.78 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 8 0.60 90.0 $33.84 0.60 90.0 $33.84 0.60 90.0 $33.84 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 9 0.25 70.0 $21.62 0.10 90.0 $28.08 0.25 70.0 $21.62 

70 PRICE, UT 1 0. 27 70.0 $24.04 0.10 90.0 $31.10 0.27 70.0 $24.04 

70 PRICE, UT 2 0.59 70.0 $24.87 0.20 90.0 $32.43 0.59 70.0 $24.87 

70 PRICE, UT 3 0.58 87.0 $35.39 0.40 90.0 $35.57 0.58 87.0 $35.39 

70 PRICE, UT 4 0.27 70.0 $24.04 0.10 90.0 $31.10 0.27 70.0 $24.04 

70 PRICE, UT 5 0.59 70.0 $24.87 0.20 90.0 $32.43 0.59 70.0 $24.87 

70 PRICE, UT 6 0.58 87.0 $35.39 0.40 90.0 $35.57 0.58 87.0 $35.39 

70 PRICE, UT 7 0.27 70.0 $24.04 0.10 90.0 $31.10 0.27 70.0 $24.04 

70 PRICE, UT 8 0.59 70.0 $24.87 0.20 90.0 $32.43 0.59 70.0 $24.87 

70 PRICE, UT 9 0.58 87.0 $35.39 0.40 90.0 $35.57 0.58 87.0 $35.39 

75 FORSYTH, MT 1 0.29 70.0 $20.97 0.10 90.0 $27.71 0.29 70.0 $20.97 

75 FORSYTH, MT 2 0.46 70.0 $21.48 0.20 90.0 $28.34 0.46 70.0 $21.48 

75 FORSYTH, MT 3 0.57 79.0 $26.33 0.30 90.0 $29.63 0.57 79.0 $26.33 

75 FORSYTH, MT 4 0.29 70.0 $20.97 0.10 90.0 $27.71 0.29 10.0 $20.97 

75 FORSYTH, MT 5 0.46 70.0 $21.48 0.20 90.0 $28.34 0.46 70.0 $21.48 

75 FORSYTH, MT 6 0.57 79.0 $26.33 0.30 90.0 $29.63 0.57 79.0 $26.33 

75 FORSYTH, MT 7 0. 29 70.0 $20.97 0.10 90.0 $27.71 0.29 70.0 $20.97 

75 FORSYTH, MT 8 0.46 70.0 $21.48 0.20 90.0 $28.34 0.46 70.0 $21.48 

75 FORSYTH, MT 9 0.57 79.0 $26.33 0.30 90.0 $29.63 0.57 79.0 $26.33 

80 MINOT, NO 1 0.57 70.0 $13.81 0.20 90.0 $18.21 0.57 70.0 $13.81 

80 MINOT, NO 2 0.56 87.0 $19.76 0.40 90.0 $19.86 0.56 87.0 $19.76 

80 MINOT, NO 3 0.57 70.0 $13.81 0.20 90.0 $18.21 0.57 70.0 $13".81 

80 MINOT, NO 4 0.56 87.0 $19.76 0.40 90.0 $19.86 0.56 87.0 $19.76 

80 MINOT, NO 5 0.31 70.0 $13.34 0.10 90.0 $17.62 0.31 70.0 $13.34 

80 MINOT, NO 6 0.31 70.0 $13.34 0.10 90.0 $17.62 0.31 70.0 $13.34 

80 MINOT, NO 7 0.57 70.0 $13.81 0.20 90.0 $18.21 0.57 70.0 $13.81 

80 MINOT, NO 8 0.56 87.0 $19.76 0.40 90.0 $19.86 0.56 87.0 $19.76 

80 MINOT, NO 9 0.31 70.0 $13.34 0.10 90.0 $17.62 0.31 70.0 $13.34 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 1 0.25 70.0 $21.47 0.10 90.0 $27.89 0.25 70.0 $21.47 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 2 0.59 73.0 $22.51 0.20 90.0 $29.37 0.59 73.0 $22.51 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 3 0.55 90.0 $33.01 0.50 90.0 $33.01 0.55 90.0 $33.01 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 4 0.25 70.0 $21.47 0.10 90.0 $27.89 0.25 70.0 $21.47 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 5 0.59 73.0 $22.51 0.20 90.0 $29.37 0.59 73.0 $22.51 87 CENTRALIA, WA 6 0.55 90.0 $33.01 0.50 90.0 $33.01 0.55 90.0 $33.01 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 7 0.25 70.0 $21.47 0.10 90.0 $27.89 0.25 70.0 $21.47 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 8 0.59 73.0 $22.51 0.20 90.0 $29.37 0.59 73.0 $22.51 87 CENTRALIA, WA 9 0.55 90.0 $33.01 0.50 90.0 $33.01 0.55 90.0 $33.01 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 1 0.27 70.0 $19.67 0.10 90.0 $25.99 0.27 70.0 $19.67 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 2 0.58 70.0 $20.50 0.20 90.0 $27.03 0.58 70.0 $20.50 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 3 0.58 87.0 $29.43 0.40 90.0 $29.58 0.58 87.0 $29.43 

Tablr~s 111 
Table E3. SOx scrubbing costs for each step on the coal resource tonnage-cost schedule-Continued 

LO NSPS DIS LO NSPS REM LO CST HI NSPS DIS HI NSPS REM HI CST RNSPS DIS RNSPS REM RNSPS CST 

SUP (LBS SOX/ LEVEL ( 1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 (LBS SOX/ LEVEL (1985 

REG II SUPPLY REGION STEP MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) MILL BTU) (%) $/TON) 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 4 0. 27 70.0 $19.67 0.10 90.0 $25.99 0.27 70.0 $19.67 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 5 0.58 70.0 $20.50 0.20 90.0 $27.03 0.58 70.0 $20.50 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 6 0.58 87.0 $29.43 0.40 90.0 $29.58 0.58 87.0 $29.43 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 7 0.27 70.0 $19.67 0.10 90.0 $25.99 0.27 70.0 $19.67 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 8 0.58 70.0 $20.50 0.20 90.0 $27.03 0.58 70.0 $20.50 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 9 0.58 87.0 $29.43 0.40 90.0 $29.58 0.58 87.0 $29.43 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 1 0.28 70.0 $22.56 0.10 90.0 $29.31 0.28 70.0 $22.56 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 2 0.50 70.0 $23. 14 0.20 90.0 $30.20 0.50 70.0 $23.14 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 3 0.59 82.0 $28. 15 0.30 90.0 $32.08 0.59 82.0 $28.15 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 4 0. 28 70.0 $22.56 0.10 90.0 $29.31 0.28 70.0 $22.56 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 5 0.50 70.0 $23. 14 0.20 90.0 $30.20 0.50 70.0 $23. 14 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 6 0.59 82.0 $28. 15 0.30 90.0 $32.08 0.59 82.0 $28.15 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 7 0.28 70.0 $22.56 0.10 90.0 $29.31 0.2B 70.0 $22.56 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 8 0.50 70.0 $23. 14 0.20 90.0 $30.20 0.50 70.0 $23.14 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 9 0.59 82.0 $28. 15 0.30 90.0 $32.08 0.59 82.0 $28.15 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 1 0.25 70.0 $21.22 0.10 90.0 $28.05 0.25 70.0 $21.22 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 2 0.58 73.0 $22.46 0.20 90.0 $29.49 0.58 73.0 $22.46 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 3 0.59 89.0 $32.94 0.50 90.0 $33.00 0.59 89.0 $32.94 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 4 0.25 70.0 $21.22 0.10 90.0 $28.05 0.25 70.0 $21.22 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 5 0.58 73.0 $22.46 0.20 90.0 $29.49 0.58 73.0 $22.46 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 6 o. 59 89.0 $32.94 0.50 90.0 $33.00 0.59 89.0 $32.94 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 7 0. 25 70.0 $21. 22 0.10 90.0 $28.05 0.25 70.0 $21.22 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 8 0.58 73.0 $22.46 0.20 90.0 $29.49 0.58 73.0 $22.46 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 9 0.59 89.0 $32.94 0.50 90.0 $33.00 0.59 89.0 $32.94 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 1 0.56 70.0 $22.03 0.20 90.0 $28.78 0.56 70.0 $22.03 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 2 0.58 86.0 $31. 12 0.40 90.0 $31.32 0.58 86.0 $31. 12 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 3 o. 25 70.0 $21.29 0.10 90.0 $27.65 0.25 70.0 $21.29 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 4 0.56 70.0 $22.03 0.20 90.0 $28.78 0.56 70.0 $22.03 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 5 0.58 86.0 $31. 12 0.40 90.0 $31.32 0.58 86.0 $31. 12 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 6 0.25 70.0 $21.29 0.10 90.0 $27.65 0.25 70.0 $21.29 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 7 0.56 70.0 $22.03 0.20 90.0 $28.78 0.56 70.0 $22.03 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 8 0.58 86.0 $31. 12 0.40 90.0 $31.32 0.58 86.0 $31.12 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 9 0.25 70.0 $21.29 0.10 90.0 $27.65 0.25 70.0 $21.29 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 1 0.58 70.0 $20.38 0.20 90.0 $26.87 0.58 70.0 $20.38 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 2 0.58 87.0 $29.28 0.40 90.0 $29.43 0.58 87.0 $29.28 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 3 0.26 70.0 $19.50 0.10 90.0 $25.78 0.26 70.0 $19.50 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 4 0.58 70.0 $20.38 0.20 90.0 $26.87 0.58 70.0 $20.38 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 5 0.58 87.0 $29.28 0.40 90.0 $29.43 0.58 87.0 $29.28 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 6 0.26 70.0 $19.50 0.10 90.0 $25.78 0.26 70.0 $19.50 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 7 0 26 70.0 $19.50 0.10 90.0 $25.78 0.26 70.0 $19.50 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 8 0.58 70.0 $20.38 0.20 90.0 $26.87 0.58 70.0 $20.38 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 9 0.58 87.0 $29.28 0.40 90.0 $29.43 0.58 87.0 $29.28 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 1 0.26 70.0 $18.74 0.10 90.0 $24.77 0.26 70.0 $18.74 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 2 0.60 72.0 $19.77 0.20 90.0 $25.99 0.60 72.0 $19.77 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 3 0.59 89.0 $29.02 0.50 90.0 $29.07 0.59 89.0 $29.02 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 4 0.26 70.0 $18.74 0.10 90.0 $24.77 0.26 70.0 $18.74 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 5 0.60 72.0 $19.77 0.20 90.0 $25.99 0.60 72.0 $19.77 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 6 0.59 89.0 $29.02 0.50 90.0 $29.07 0.59 89.0 $29.02 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 7 0.26 70.0 $18.74 0.10 90.0 $24.77 0.26 70.0 $18.74 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 8 0.60 72.0 $19.77 0.20 90.0 $25.99 0.60 72.0 $19.77 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 9 0.59 89.0 $29.02 0.50 90.0 $29.07 0.59 89.0 $29.02 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 1 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 2 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 3 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 4 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 5 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 6 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 7 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 8 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 9 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 10 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 11 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 12 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 13 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 14 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 15 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 16 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 17 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 18 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 19 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 20 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 21 0.25 70 0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 22 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 23 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 24 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 25 0.25 70.0 $17.08 0.10 90.0 $22.58 0.25 70.0 $17.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 26 0.57 70.0 $17.85 0.20 90.0 $23.53 0.57 70.0 $17.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 27 0.60 86.0 $25.45 0.40 90.0 $25.62 0.60 86.0 $25.45 

97 FORT UNION, MT 1 0.32 70.0 $13.64 0.10 90.0 $18.02 0.32 70.0 $13.64 

97 FORT UNION, MT 2 0.59 79.0 $17. 11 0.30 90.0 "19.26 0.59 79.0 $17.11 

97 FORT UNION, MT 3 0.84 90.0 $23.05 0.80 90.0 $23.05 0.84 90.0 $23.05 

97 FORT UNION, MT 4 0.32 70.0 $13.64 0.10 90.0 $18.02 0.32 70.0 $13.64 

97 FORT UNION, MT 5 0.59 79.0 $17.11 0.30 90.0 $19.26 0.59 79.0 $17. 11 

97 FORT UNION, MT 6 0.84 90.0 $23.05 0.80 90.0 $23.05 0.84 ~0.0 $23.05 

97 FORT UNION, MT 7 0.32 70.0 $13.64 0.10 90.0 $18.02 0.32 70.0 $13.64 

97 FORT UNION, MT 8 0. 59 79.0 $17. 11 0.30 90.0 $19.26 0.59 79.0 $17.11 

97 FORT UNION, MT 9 0.84 90.0 $23.05 0.80 90.0 $23.05 0.84 ~0.0 $23.05 

98 FORT UNION, NO 1 0.59 76.0 $14.23 0.20 90.0 $18.59 0.59 76.0 $14.23 

98 FORT UNION, NO 2 0.68 90.0 $21.49 0. 70 90.0 $21.49 0.68 ~0.0 $21.49 

98 FORT UNION, NO 3 0.31 70.0 $13.34 0.10 90.0 $17.62 0.31 70.0 $13.34 

98 FORT UNION, NO 4 0.59 76.0 $14.23 0.20 90.0 $18.59 0.59 T6.0 $14.23 

98 FORT UNION, NO 5 0.68 90.0 $21.49 0.70 90.0 $21.49 0.68 fO.O $21.49 

98 FORT UNION, NO 6 0.31 70.0 $13.34 0.10 90.0 $17.62 0.31 TO.O $13.34 

98 FORT UNION, NO 7 0.59 76.0 $14.23 0.20 90.0 $18.59 0.59 T6.0 $14.23 

98 FORT UNION, NO 8 0.68 90.0 $21.49 o. 70 90.0 $21.49 0.68 5'0.0 $21.49 

98 FORT UNION, NO 9 0.31 70.0 $13.34 0.10 90.0 $17.62 0.31 70.0 $13.34 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 1 0.45 70.0 $20.42 0.10 90.0 $26.95 0.45 70.0 $20.42 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 2 0.27 70.0 $19.92 0.10 90.0 $26.34 0.27 70.0 $19.92 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 3 0.45 70.0 $20.42 0.10 90.0 $26.95 0.45 70.0 $20.42 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 4 0.27 70.0 $19.92 0.10 90.0 $26.34 0.27 70.0 $19.92 

112 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table Fl. Rail transport rate equations 

{Dependent Variable is Rate in 1975 $/ton)* 

Eqtn** Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Eqtn Explanatory Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 

Constant -6.5 -1.6 0.49 -13.6 -2.5•4 8.33 -0.24 -4.91 -9.79 -14.15 -4.23 2.32 

(1.6) (2.3) (0.42) (0.5) (0.70) (1.28) (0.44) (3.94) (1.63) (3.11) (0.25) (1.20) 

AS - Annual Shipment tonnage -5.0 -5.52 54.84 8.62 1.29 -23.7 348.3 -12.2 83.5 

between origin and ( 1. 7) (0.61) (6.20) (2.19) (55.60) (7 .3) (562.9) {0.9) (14.0) 

destination 

CONSOWN - Dummy. Consignee Ownership of cars = 1; 1.04 

0 otherwise. {0.53) 

FOBPRIS - Fob mine price 0.05 0.03 -U.UOUB 

by county of coal (0.02) (0.09) (0.01) 

LOADTIM - No. of hours to 0.09 0.07 0.02 

load train at origin. (0.05) (0.07) (0.005) 

MILES - Distance between 0.67 1.19 0.71 

origin and destination {0.07) (0.35) (0.04) 

MINTON - Minimum annual 

tonnage required by railroad between origin and -0.06 0.12 -0.62 

destination. (0.28) (0.56) (0.09) 

MISS - Dummy. Shipment crosses Mississippi = 1; (0.60) 2.21 

0 otherwise. (0.54) {0.17) 

MLSH - Miles times annual no. of shipments between -0.47 0.77 -1.10 0.09 -4.91 -0.12 -16.7 -0.05 0.09 

{0.02) {0.08) (0.33) (0.02) (1.19) (0.51) {4.6) (0.02) (0.09) 

NS - Annual no. of shipments between origin and 0.008 -0.008 -0.04 -0.01 -0.04 -0.03 0.29 -0.005 -0.08 

destination (0.002) (0.001) (0.06) (0.001) (0.06) (0.01) (0.46) (0.0009) {0.01) 

PALT - Delivered price of -0.0008 -0.003 0.02 an alternative fuel (0.0176) {0.040) (0.01) 

RR - No. of coal hauling -0.13 -0.09 -0.18 0.76 -0.43 -0.16 0.08 -0.15 

railroads in origin county {0.02) (0.06) (0.04) {0.49) {0.07) {0.25) {0.02) {0.09) 

-1 

Ill RROWN - Dummy. Railroad Q" owns the cars - 1; 0 -0.53 0.56 1.09 ;;-

{II otherwise • (0.43) (0.58) (0.22) 

... 

... 

~ 
... 

ol:o 

m 

s 

:I 

= 3 

rr 

m 

~ !l 

Ill 

-

= 

~ 

~ 3 

., 

!. 

~ 

el. 

I""' 

t» 

:I 

Q. 

C: 

Ill 

~ 

jill:l 

~ 

~ 

[ 

cs· 

~ 

= :I 

c 

~ 

n 

= 

~ 

~ ; 

;!' 

Table F1. Rail transport rate equations-Continued 

Explanatory Variables 

Eqtn** 

1 

Eqtn 

2 

Eqtn 

3 

Eqtn 

4 

Eqtn 

5 

Eqtn 

6 

Eqtn 

7 

Eqtn 

8 

Eqtn 

9 

Eqtn 

10 Eqtn 11 

Eqtn 

12 

SIP -Air quality restriction in destination 

county. 

-0.16 -0.12 -0.21 0.08 0.07 0.67 -0.13 0.07 

(0.01) (0.02) (0.02) (0.24) (0.08) (0.30) (0.01) (0.06) 

TO - Dummy. Truck competi- tion = 1; 0 otherwise. 

TONS - Minimum no. of tons 

required per trainload by railroad between origin 

and destination 

TT - Optimum transit time 

between origin and 

destination 

UNlOAD - Hours to unload 

train at destination 

R2 

Std Error of Regression 

0.45 

(0.15) 

0.21 

(0.04) 

0.92 

No. of Observations 38 

-0.17 

(0.23) 

0.06 

(0.06) 

0.77 

26 

0.01 

(0.03) 

0.06 

(0.01) 

0.85 

184 

-1.37 

(0.22) 

0.15 

(0.003) 

2.71 

2855 

0.05 

(0.006) 

0.49 

967 

0.13 

(0.01) 

1.65 

412 

0.03 

(0.004) 

0.28 

1181 

0.08 

(0.03) 

2.15 

77 

0.13 

(0.02) 

1.03 

405 

0.17 

(0.03) 

2.26 

113 

0.08 0.04 

(0.002) (0.009) 

1.17 

6896 

7.45 

9496 

*see Bernknopf (1985) for details concerning rationale for explanatory variables. Equations 1 through 3 (unit trains) are discussed in Chapter 4, pp. 102-06. Equations 4 through 12 (regular rail) are discussed in Appendix IV.B, pp. 126-36. Numbers 

in parentheses, below estimated parameter values, are estimated standard errors for the parameter values. 

**Equation 1: Unit train, West. 

Equation 2: Unit train, Midwest. 

Equation 3: Unit train, East. 

Equation 4: Regular rail, West. 

Equation 5: Regular rail, Midwest intraregional, more than 38 shipments annually. Equation 6: Regular rail, Midwest intraregional, fewer than 38 shipments annually. 

Equation 7: Regular rail, Midwest interregional to the East, more than 80 shipments annually. 

Equation 8: Regular rail, Midwest interregional to the East, fewer than 80 shipments annually. Equation 9: Regular rail, East interregional to the South, minimum transit time less than 117 hour.s. 

Equation 10 Regular rail, East interregional to the South, minimum transit time greater than 117 hours. 

Equation 11 Regular rail, East intraregional. minimum transit time less than 117 hours. 

Equation 12 Regular rail, East intraregional. minimum transit time greater than 117 hours. 
Table F2. Loading dock locations for rail/barge transport 

of coal 

Coal Loading 

Dock 

Ohio, Monongahela & Allegheny Confluence 

Ohio River 

Monongahela River 

Kanawha River 

Kanawha & Ohio Confluence 

Kentucky & Ohio Confluence 

Ohio River 

Green & Ohio Confluence 

Cumberland & Ohio Confluence 

Cumberland River in AQCR 208 

Upper Mississippi River 

Upper Mississippi River 

Upper Mississippi River 

Upper Mississippi River 

Upper Mississippi River 

Upper Mississippi River 

Mississippi & Missouri Confluence 

Lower Mississippi River 

Tennessee River 

Tennessee River 

Black Warrior River 

Illinois & Mississippi Confluence 

Illinois River 

Illinois River 

Arkansas River 

Arkansas River 

Arkansas River 

Quachita River 

Alabama River 

Chattahoochee River 

AQCR 

Location 

197 

181 

235 

103 

103 

79 

78 

77 

72 

208 

131 

128 

68 

69 

65 

70 

137 

106 

207 

7 

4 

75 

71 

67 

17 

21 

186 

19 

1 

2 

Tabler 115 
Table F3. lock capacities for barge transport of coal 

Location of Lock* 

Upper Ohio River, AQCR 197 

Upper Ohio River, AQCR 181 

Upper Ohio River, AQCR 179 

Middle Ohio River, AQCR 103 

Middle Ohio River, AQCR 79 

Middle Ohio River, AQCRs 78, 83 & 104 

Lower Ohio River, AQCR 77 

Lower Ohio River, AQCRs 72, 74 & 138 

Kanawha River, AQCR 234 

Monongahela River, AQCR 235 

Kentucky River, Upper Reach, AQCR 101 

Kentucky River, Lower Reach, AQCR 102 

Green River, AQCR 105 

Cumberland River, AQCR 208 

Tennessee River, Upper Reach, AQCR 207 

Tennessee River, Middle Reach, AQCR 55 

Tennessee River, Middle Reach, AQCR 7 

Tennessee River, Lower Reach, AQCR 209 

Mississippi River, Upper Reach, AQCR 131 

Mississippi River, Upper Reach, AQCR 128 

Mississippi River, Upper Reach, AQCR 68 

Mississippi River, Upper Reach, AQCR 69 

Mississippi River, Upper Reach, AQCR 65 

Mississippi River, Middle Reach AQCR 137 

Mississippi River, Middle Reach AQCR 70 

Illinois River, Upper Reach, AQCR 67 

Illinois River, Middle Reach, AQCR 71 

Illinois River, Lower Reach, AQCR 75 

Arkansas River, Middle Reach, AQCR 186 

Arkansas River, Lower Reach, AQCR 17 

Arkansas River, Lower Reach, AQCR 21 

Arkansas River, Lower Reach, AQCR 16 

Quachita River, AQCR 19 

Alabama River, AQCR 1 

Tombigbee River, Upper Reach, AQCR 135 

Tombigbee River, Lower Reach, AQCR 5 

Black Warrior River, AQCR 4 

Chatahoochee River, Middle Reach, AQCR 2 

Chatahoochee River, Lower Realch, AQCR 6 

Gulf Intercoastal Waterway, West, AQCR 216 

Downstream 

Capacity 

( 1000 tons 

per year) 

12923 

39284 

38786 

20440 

29594 

26414 

30776 

139118 

5033 

2886 

1603 

1603 

11584 

4872 

4312 

4313 

8003 

8420 

4924 

9032 

12528 

12802 

12330 

12043 

35693 

6874 

8379 

11643 

6078 

7381 

7879 

7381 

4452 

8828 

15841 

1000000 

5938 

2314 

2314 

14770 

Upstream 

Capacity 

( 1000 tons 

per year) 

11948 

28460 

26243 

12748 

16716 

13182 

13078 

47419 

5033 

2886 

1603 

1603 

11584 

4872 

4312 

4313 

8003 

8420 

4924 

9032 

12528 

12802 

12330 

12043 

35693 

6874 

8379 

11643 

6078 

7381 

7879 

7381 

4452 

8828 

15841 

1000000 

5938 

2314 

2314 

14770 

*Lock capacity for coal is capacity of smallest lock in river reach adjusted to 

account for barge shipment of commodities other than coal, and to account for 

two-way traffic. 

116 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F4. Transmission capacities for mine mouth power plants 

( 1000 TONS OF COAL EQUIVALENT) 

SUP 

REG # SUPPLY REGION 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5125 5933 6834 8262 9753 11400 

8 LEBANON, VA 2937 3400 3916 4735 5590 6533 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 3478 4026 4637 5606 6618 7735 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 14744 17067 19659 23769 28059 32795 

14 CADIZ, OH 4825 5585 6433 7778 9182 10731 

"j 6 PITTSBURGH, PA 31634 36618 42178 50997 60200 70361 

17 KITTANNING, PA 17404 20147 23206 28058 33121 38712 

20 SOMERSET, PA 4969 5752 6626 8011 9457 11053 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 7842 9078 10456 12642 14924 17443 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 6354 7355 8472 10243 12091 i4132 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 7358 8517 9811 11862 14003 16366 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 382 442 509 615 726 849 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 3970 4595 5293 6400 7555 8830 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 7788 9015 10383 12555 14820 17322 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 5895 6824 7860 9504 11219 13113 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 9028 10450 12037 14554 17180 20080 

48 CLINTON, MO 2655 3073 3539 4279 5052 5904 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 2383 2758 3177 3841 4534 5299 

62 GUNNISON, co 167 193 222 269 317 371 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 3020 3496 4027 4869 5748 6718 

70 PRICE, UT 1739 2013 2319 2804 3310 3869 

80 MINOT, ND 5999 6945 7999 9672 11417 13344 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 6999 8102 9332 11284 13320 15568 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 16000 18521 21333 25794 30449 35588 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 1069 1238 1426 1724 2035 2378 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 2386 2762 3181 3846 4540 5307 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 2000 2315 2666 3224 3806 4448 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 5273 6104 7031 8501 10035 11729 

98 FORT UNION, ND 12000 13891 16001 19346 22837 26692 

Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train 

SUP OEM RATE REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 1 JACKSON, AL $5.64 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 2 COLUMBUS, GA $6.59 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 3 GADSDEN, AL $3.56 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $2.37 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5 MOBILE, AL $6.57 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 6 DOTHAN, AL $5.91 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7 DECATUR, AL $3.92 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 18 MEMPHIS, TN $9.03 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 49 JACKSONVILLE, FL $10.22 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $15.45 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 51 FT. MEYER, FL $14.78 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 53 AUGUSTA, GA $9.29 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 54 MACON, GA $7.95 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $4.83 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 56 ATLANTA, GA $7.74 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 57 ATHENS, GA $7.72 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 58 SAVANNAH, GA $10.56 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 59 ALBANY, GA $7.91 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $8.46 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 134 GREENVILLE, MS $6.89 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 135 TUPELO, MS $4.83 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 166 RALEIGH, NC $9.35 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $8.78 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 198 SUMTER, sc $9"52 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 199 CHARLESTON, sc $10.05 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 200 COLUMBIA, sc $8.86 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 201 FLORENCE, sc $10.11 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $4.85 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 203 GREENWOOD, sc $7.72 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $9.12 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 208 NASHVILLE, TN $8.33 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 209 JACKSON, TN $8.52 

4 JASPER, TN 1 JACKSON, AL $8.40 4 JASPER, TN 2 COLUMBUS, GA $8.42 

4 JASPER, TN 3 GADSDEN, AL $4.56 4 JASPER, TN 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $5.11 

4 JASPER, TN 7 DECATUR, AL $4. 16 4 JASPER, TN 48 ORLANDO, FL $13 76 

4 JASPER, TN 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $16.51 

4 JASPER, TN 51 FT MEYER, FL $16.13 4 JASPER, TN 52 TAMPA, FL $13.21 4 JASPER, TN 54 MACON, GA $8" 18 

Tables 117 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

4 ..JASPER, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $3.16 

4 ..JASPER, TN 56 ATLANTA, GA $7.78 

4 ..JASPER, TN 57 ATHENS, GA $7.84 

4 ..JASPER, TN 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $11.19 

4 ..JASPER, TN 135 TUPELO, MS $6.40 

4 ..JASPER, TN 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $7.10 

4 ..JASPER, TN 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $8.14 

4 ..JASPER, TN 203 GREENWOOD, sc $7.84 

4 ..JASPER, TN 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $11.21 

4 ..JASPER, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $7.46 

4 ..JASPER, TN 208 NASHVILLE, TN $4.83 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 1 ..JACKSON, AL $11.28 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 2 COLUMBUS, GA $11.11 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 3 GADSDEN, AL $7.46 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $8.01 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 5 MOBILE, AL $12.21 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 6 DOTHAN, AL $11.55. 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 7 DECATUR, AL $7.93 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 50 W. PALM BEACH, FL $19.08 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 51 FT. MEYER, FL $18.72 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 53 AUGUSTA, GA $11.32 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 54 MACON, GA $10.77 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $6.06 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 56 ATLANTA, GA $10.37 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 57 ATHENS, GA $10.43 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 58 SAVANNAH, GA $13.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 79 CINCINNATI, OH $9.29 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 101 HAZARD, KY $9.50 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.78 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $10.71 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $13.29 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 135 TUPELO, MS $10.18 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 164 OLEAN, NY $10.71 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 166 RALEIGH, NC $9.26 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $13.59 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $9.99 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $11.34 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 170 WILMINGTON, NC $12. 13 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $7. 12 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 173 DAYTON, OH $10.03 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 176 COLUMBUS, OH $10.94 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 177 LIMA, OH $11.11 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $10.52 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 198 SUMTER, sc $10.24 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 199 CHARLESTON, sc $11.53 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 200 COLUMBIA, sc $9.58 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 201 FLORENCE, sc $10.81 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $8.16 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 203 GREENWOOD, sc $9.22 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $12.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $7.48 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 208 NASHVILLE, TN $9.96 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 234 CHARLESTON, wv $11.47 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 236 BECKLEY, WV $11.15 

8 LEBANON, VA 1 ..JACKSON, AL $12.36 

8 LEBANON, VA 2 COLUMBUS, GA $11.89 

8 LEBANON, VA 3 GADSDEN, AL $8.67 

8 LEBANON, VA 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $9.22 

8 LEBANON, VA 6 DOTHAN, AL $12.47 

8 LEBANON, VA 7 DECATUR, AL $9.14 

8 LEBANON, VA 41 NORWICH, CT $15.92 

8 LEBANON, VA 42 HARTFORD, CT $15.52 

8 LEBANON, VA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $15.48 

8 LEBANON, VA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $13.72 

8 LEBANON, VA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $11.60 

8 LEBANON, VA 49 ..JACKSONVILLE, FL $13.04 

8 LEBANON, VA 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $18.30 

8 LEBANON, VA 51 FT. MEYER, FL $18.42 

8 LEBANON, VA 53 AUGUSTA, GA $9.79 

8 LEBANON, VA 54 MACON, GA $11.55 

8 LEBANON, VA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $7.29 

8 LEBANON, VA 56 ATLANTA, GA $11.15 

8 LEBANON, VA 57 ATHENS, GA $10.15 

8 LEBANON, VA 58 SAVANNAH, GA $11.47 

8 LEBANON, VA 59 ALBANY, GA $12.95 

8 LEBANON, VA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $9.96 

8 LEBANON, VA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $9.92 

8 LEBANON, VA 101 HAZARD, .KY $10.13 

8 LEBANON, VA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $9.41 

8 LEBANON, VA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $9.43 

8 LEBANON, VA 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $9.16 

8 LEBANON, VA 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $10.26 

8 LEBANON, VA 107 LEWISTON, ME $19.59 

8 LEBANON, VA 112 FREDERICK, MD $11.79 

8 LEBANON, VA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $11.70 

8 LEBANON, VA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $12.34 

8 LEBANON, VA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $12.21 

8 LEBANON, VA 123 DETROIT, MI $12.66 

8 LEBANON, VA 135 TUPELO, MS $11.41 

8 LEBANON, VA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $19.38 

8 LEBANON, VA 164 OLEAN, NY $6.40 

8 LEBANON, VA 165 HICKORY, NC $10.81 

118 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

8 LEBANON, VA 166 RALEIGH, NC $7.27 

8 LEBANON, VA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $9.96 

8 LEBANON, VA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $7.74 

8 LEBANON, VA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $9.20 

8 LEBANON, VA 170 WILMINGTON, NC $10.13 

8 LEBANON, VA 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $6.34 

8 LEBANON, VA 173 DAYTON, OH $10.60 

8 LEBANON, VA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $11.24 

8 LEBANON, VA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $10.13 

8 LEBANON, VA 177 LIMA, OH $11.43 

8 LEBANON, VA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $11.28 

8 LEBANON, VA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $11.85 

8 LEBANON, VA 181 WHEELING, wv $12.66 

8 LEBANON, VA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $9.43 

8 LEBANON, VA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $10.52 

8 LEBANON, VA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $12.78 

8 LEBANON, VA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $11.85 

8 LEBANON, VA 198 SUMTER, sc $8.71 

8 LEBANON, VA 199 CHARLESTON, sc $10.01 

8 LEBANON, VA 200 COLUMBIA, sc $8.06 

8 LEBANON, VA 201 FLORENCE, sc $9.05 

8 LEBANON, VA 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $6.64 

8 LEBANON, VA 203 GREENWOOD, sc $7.70 

8 LEBANON, VA 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $10.24 

8 LEBANON, VA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $8.20 

8 LEBANON, VA 206 NASHVILLE, TN $11.49 

8 LEBANON, VA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $8.90 

8 LEBANON, VA 223 NORFOLK, VA $11.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $11.51 

8 LEBANON, VA 225 RICHMOND, VA $10.73 

8 LEBANON, VA 226 ROANOKE, VA $8.90 

8 LEBANON, VA 231 ELKINS, wv $11.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $10.81 

8 LEBANON, VA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $10.71 

8 LEBANON, VA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9.41 

8 LEBANON, VA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $12.47 

8 LEBANON, VA 236 BECKLEY, wv $8.59 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 1 JACKSON, AL $12.44 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 2 COLUMBUS, GA $11.98 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $8.76 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $9.31 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $13.36 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 6 DOTHAN, AL $12.53 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $9.22 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN $14.73 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 41 NORWICH, CT $16.73 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 42 HARTFORD, CT $16.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 43 NEW YORK, NY $16.01 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 44 TORRINGTON, CT $16.28 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $14.52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 46 DOVER, DE $14.54 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 47 WASHINGTON, DC $12.40 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 48 ORLANDO, FL $16.49 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 49 JACKSONVILLE, FL $13.74 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $19.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 51 FT. MEYER, FL $19.12 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $16.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA $10.52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 54 MACON, GA $11.62 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $7.36 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $11.24 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 57 ATHENS, GA $10.85 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 58 SAVANNAH, GA $12.19 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 59 ALBANY, GA $13.04 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL $11.09 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 66 DANVILLE, IL $11.91 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 67 CHICAGO, IL $12.87 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $13.89 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 71 LASALLE, IL $13.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $13.21 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $14.08 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 74 MARION, IL $13.40 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $13.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 76 MUNCIE, IN $10 .. 30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $11.79 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $8.42 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $7. 17 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $10.62 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $10.83 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $12.11 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $11.26 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $11.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $8.25 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $7.53 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $5.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $8.37 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $9.48 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $15.39 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 107 LEWISTON, ME $20.39 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 112 FREDERICK, MD $12.59 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $12.51 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 114 SALISBURY, MD $14.37 

Tables 119 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 115 BALTIMORE, MD $13.14 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $13.02 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $16.77 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 118 WORCESTER, MA $17.49 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 119 BOSTON, MA $18.10 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $17.45 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 121 MANCHESTER, NH $18.53 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $10.68 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 123 DETROIT, MI $9.33 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $10.49 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $10.45 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 126 MARQUETTE, MI $15.90 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 129 DULUTH, MN $16.94 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $18.93 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 134 GREENVILLE, MS $13.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 135 TUPELO, MS $11.47 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 136 GREENSBORO, NC $13.40 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $14.01 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $15.65 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 151 SCRANTON, PA $15.62 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 158 SYRACUSE, NY $19.82 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 159 BURLINGTON, VT $12.87 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 160 ROCHESTER, NY $17.81 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 161 ALBANY, NY $13.44 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 162 BUFFALO, NY $16.07 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $13.74 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 164 OLEAN, NY $9.43 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 165 HICKORY, NC $11.62 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC $7.97 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $10.77 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $8.54 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $10.01 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 170 WILMINGTON, NC $10.83 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $6.55 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $7.25 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 174 CLEVELAND, OH $10.73 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 175 MANSFIELD, OH $7.91 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $6.81 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 177 LIMA, OH $8.10 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 178 DUBOIS, PA $12.83 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $7.95 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 180 SANDUSKY, OH $8.52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv $9.33 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $6.11 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $7.19 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 195 ALTOONA, PA $12.61 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 196 HARRISBURG, PA $13.57 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $8.52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 198 SUMTER, sc $9.41 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc $10.73 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc $8.78 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 201 FLORENCE, sc $9.77 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $7.34 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 203 GREENWOOD, sc $8.40 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $10.94 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $8.29 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $11.58 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 209 JACKSON, TN $13.86 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 221 MONTPELIER, VT $18.85 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $9.71 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 223 NORFOLK, VA $12.49 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $12.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 225 RICHMOND, VA $11.51 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 226 ROANOKE, VA $9.71 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 231 ELKINS, wv $9.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 232 GASSAWAY, wv $8.25 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $11.51 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $6.87 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $9. 14 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 236 BECKLEY, WV $7.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $14.61 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 238 WAUSAU, WI $14.88 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $11.66 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 240 MADISON, WI $12.25 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 1 JACKSON, AL $11.45 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $7.76 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $8.31 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $12.36 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $8.23 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 47 WASHINGTON, DC $13.93 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $18.95 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 51 FT. MEYER, FL $18.59 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $15.67 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA $11.13 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 54 MACON, GA $10.64 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $6.36 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $10.24 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 58 SAVANNAH, GA $12.80 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 59 ALBANY, GA $12.04 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $15.01 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $7.95 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $7.91 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $8 12 

120 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP DEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $7.40 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $9.33 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 104 Ell ZABETHTOWN, KY $7. 17 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.25 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $11.94 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $12.61 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $11.72 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 162 BUFFALO, NY $18.08 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 165 HICKORY, NC $13. 14 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $12.30 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $6.93 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc $11 34 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc $9.39 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 201 FLORENCE, sc $10.64 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $7.97 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $11.81 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $7.29 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $10.58 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 223 NORFOLK, VA $14.01 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 225 RICHMOND, VA $13.06 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $19.61 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $9.88 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $8.35 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $7.99 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $6.38 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $7.48 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $9.41 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $8.31 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $9.41 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $8.73 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 175 MANSFIELD, OH $10.52 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $9.65 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 177 LIMA, OH $9.82 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $9.22 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $10.49 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $11.24 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $10.18 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $6.78 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $7.36 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $11.41 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $7.25 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA $8.54 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 54 MACON, GA $9.67 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $5.41 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $9.29 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 57 ATHENS, GA $8.90 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL $8. 18 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 66 DANVILLE, IL $9.01 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $10.30 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 76 MUNCIE, IN $7.40 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $8.88 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $5.51 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $4.26 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $7.72 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $7.93 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $9.22 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $8.37 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $8.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $5.36 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $4.64 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $3.22 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $5.49 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $6.57 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 107 LEWISTON, ME $18.21 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $7.78 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 123 DETROIT, MI $6.42 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $7.59 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, Ml $7.57 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 135 TUPELO, MS $9.52 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 164 OLEAN, NY $7.48 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC $6.02 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $8.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $6.59 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $8.06 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 170 WILMINGTON, NC $8.88 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $4.60 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $4.37 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 174 CLEVELAND, OH $7.82 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 175 MANSFIELD, OH $5.02 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $3.90 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 177 LIMA, OH $5.19 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $5.07 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 180 SANDUSKY, OH $5.62 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv $6.44 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $3.22 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $4.28 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $5.62 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 198 SUMTER, sc $7.46 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc $8.76 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc $6.81 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 201 FLORENCE, sc $7.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $5.38 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 203 GREENWOOD, sc $6.44 

Tables 121 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $8.99 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $6.32 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $9.60 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $7.74 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 226 ROANOKE, VA $7.74 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 231 ELKINS, wv $6.93 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 232 GASSAWAY, wv $5.36 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $9.05 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, WV $3.96 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 235 CLARKSBURG, WV $6.23 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 236 BECKLEY, WV $5.34 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $11.72 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $8.76 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 240 MADISON, WI $9.35 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 3 GADSDEN, AL $10.68 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $11.26 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 5 MOBILE, AL $15.45 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 7 DECATUR, AL $10.43 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $9.31 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 65 PEORIA, IL $8.16 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 66 DANVILLE, IL $8.99 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 67 CHICAGO, IL $9.58 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $11.26 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 71 LASALLE, IL $10.66 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 73 ROCKFORD, IL $10.79 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $10.75 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 76 MUNCIE, IN $7.23 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $10.18 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $6.83 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 79 CINCINNATI, OH $4.90 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $7.70 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $7.34 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $8.63 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $8.52 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $8.78 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 101 HAZARD, KY $8.01 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 102 LEXINGTON, KY $6.81 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $6.06 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $6.93 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.01 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 107 LEWISTON, ME $17.60 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 112 FREDERICK, MD $10.71 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $10.15 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $1. 17 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 123 DETROIT, MI $5.75 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 124 TOLEDO, OH $6.91 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $6.97 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 136 GREENSBORO, NC $10.75 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 159 BURLINGTON, VT $9.14 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 161 ALBANY, NY $9.71 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $9.86 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 166 RALEIGH, NC $11.09 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $10.01 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $9.75 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 173 DAYTON, OH $4.28 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH $7.00 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 175 MANSFIELD, OH $4.05 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 176 COLUMBlJS, OH $3.29 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 177 LIMA, OH $4.60 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA $9.20 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $5.28 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 180 SANDUSKY, OH $4.79 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 181 WHEELING, wv $5.72 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $3.75 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $3.43 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.01 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 196 HARRISBURG, PA $10.98 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $4.92 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $10.54 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 207 KNOXVILLE, TN' $11.07 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 208 NASHVILLE, TN $11.21 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $11.02 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 226 ROANOKE, VA $11.02 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 231 ELKINS, WV $7.55 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 232 GASSAWAY, wv $7.67 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $9.29 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 234 CHARLESTON, wv $6.28 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $6.49 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 236 BECKLEY, wv $7.65 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 237 GREEN BAY, WI $11.32 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 239 MIL'NAUKEE, WI $8.37 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 240 MADISON, WI $8.95 

14 CADIZ, OH 76 MUNCIE, IN $8.54 

14 CADIZ, OH 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $8.16 

14 CADIZ, OH 79 C INC I NNA TI , OH $6.25 

14 CADIZ, OH 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $8.29 

14 CADIZ, OH 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.14 

14 CADIZ, OH 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $7.21 

14 CADIZ, OH 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $8.27 

14 CADIZ, OH 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $7.42 

14 CADIZ, OH 123 DETROIT, MI $6.00 

14 CADIZ, OH 124 TOLEDO, OH $7. 17 

122 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

14 CADIZ, OH 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $7.55 

14 CADIZ, OH 159 BUR Ll NGTON, VT $8.03 

14 CADIZ, OH 173 DAYTON, OH $5.60 

14 CADIZ, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH $6.11 

14 CADIZ, OH 175 MANSFIELD, OH $4.39 

14 CADIZ, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $4.60 

14 CADIZ, OH 177 LIMA, OH $5.70 

14 CADIZ, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA $7.42 

14 CADIZ, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $5.77 

14 CADIZ, OH 180 SANDUSKY, OH $4.79 

14 CADIZ, OH 181 WHEELING, wv $4.35 

14 CADIZ, OH 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $5.30 

14 CADIZ, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $4.03 

14 CADIZ, OH 195 ALTOONA, PA $7.23 

14 CADIZ, OH 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $3.16 

14 CADIZ, OH 231 ELKINS, wv $6.64 

14 CADIZ, OH 232 GASSAWAY, wv $7.31 

14 CADIZ, OH 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $7.95 

14 CADIZ, OH 234 CHARLESTON, wv $7.42 

14 CADIZ, OH 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $5.83 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 123 DETROIT, MI $8.93 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $13.19 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 164 OLEAN, NY $17.79 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 173 DAYTON, OH $9.20 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH $8.48 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 175 MANSFIELD, OH $7.40 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.42 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 177 LIMA, OH $8.67 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA $9.65 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 180 SANDUSKY, OH $7.55 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 181 WHEE Ll NG, WV $8.29 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $9.09 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $7.82 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 197 PITTSBURGH , PA $5.85 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 5 MOBILE, AL $20.90 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 7 DECATUR, AL $15.88 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $14.67 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $14.25 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $13.95 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $14.23 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $12.78 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 46 DOVER, DE $13.04 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $12.68 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 50 w. PALM BEACH, Fl $26.50 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 51 FT. MEYER, FL $26.63 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $14.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 65 PEORIA, IL $13.33 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 66 DANVILLE, IL $14.42 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 67 CHICAGO, IL $14.39 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 76 MUNCIE, IN $12.66 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $15.65 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $12.27 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $10.37 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $13.10 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $12.19 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $13.25 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $13.95 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $14.20 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 101 HAZARD, KY $13.36 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $12.25 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $10.94 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 104 Ell ZABETHTOWN, KY $12.38 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $13.48 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $18.21 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $11.26 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $10.71 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 114 SALISBURY, MD $13.89 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $12. 11 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MO $13.02 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $13.82 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 119 BOSTON, MA $16.05 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $15.39 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH $16.35 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $11.34 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $9.92 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $11.09 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $11 .47 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 129 DULUTH, MN $18.27 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $12.19 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $12.19 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $13. 14 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $16.79 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $10.41 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $14.73 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $10.98 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $12.57 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $10.73 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $17.15 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 166 RALEIGH, NC $14.61 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $13.74 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $13.19 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $14.39 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $14.84 

Tablf'"' 123 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG N SUPPLY REGION REG N DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $9.71 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $9.46 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $8.37 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.71 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 177 LIMA, OH $9.65 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $9.33 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $9.12 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $8.52 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $7.00 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $9.22 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $7.89 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.14 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $11.11 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $4.83 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 208 NASHVILLE, TN $16.66 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $13.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $13.31 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 225 RICHMOND, VA $14. 12 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $13.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 231 ELKINS, WV $9.60 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 232 GASSAWAY, WV $10.30 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $9.84 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 234 CHARLESTOf>:!, wv $11.15 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $8.99 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 236 BECKLEY, wv $12.53 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $13.19 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 240 MADISON, WI $13.78 

17 KITTANNING, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $17.55 

17 KITTANNING, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $17. 15 

17 KITTANNING, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $16.85 

17 KITTANNING, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $17. 13 

17 KITTANNING, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $15.69 

17 KITTANNING, PA 46 DOVER, DE $15.92 

17 KITTANNING, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $15.94 

17 KITTANNING, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL $18.89 

17 KITTANNING, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $21. 12 

17 KITTANNING, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $16.30 

17 KITTANNING, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $13.19 

17 KITTANNING, PA 129 DULUTH, MN $21.56 

17 KITTANNING, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $15.09 

17 KITTANNING, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $14.84 

17 KITTANNING, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $19.69 

17 KITTANNING, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $17.62 

17 KITTANNING, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $12.72 

17 KITTANNING, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $15.48 

17 KITTANNING, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $12.89 

17 KITTANNING, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $20.42 

17 KITTANNING, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $11.68 

17 KITTANNING, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $12.21 

17 KITTANNING, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $11.55 

17 KITTANNING, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $12.64 

17 KITTANNING, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $11.81 

17 KITTANNING, PA 181 WHEELING. wv $8.48 

17 KITTANNING, PA 183 ZANESVILLE. OH $11.41 

17 KITTANNING, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.54 

17 KITTANNING, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $14.01 

17 KITTANNING, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $8.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $13.02 

17 KITTANNING, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $13- 12 

17 KITTANNING, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $12.40 

17 KITTANNING, PA 237 GREEN BAY, WI $18.80 

17 KITTANNING, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $16.47 

18 SHARON, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $16.62 

18 SHARON, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $16.01 

18 SHARON, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $16.56 

18 SHARON, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL $16.24 

18 SHARON, PA 79 CII\ICINNATI, OH $11-53 

18 SHARON, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $10.54 

18 SHARON, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $17.68 

18 SHARON, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $10.75 

18 SHARON, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $15.67 

18 SHARON, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $11.34 

18 SHARON, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $14.03 

18 SHARON, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $11.28 

18 SHARON, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $19.40 

18 SHARON, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $10.79 

18 SHARON, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $7.63 

18 SHARON, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $9.01 

18 SHARON, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $10.01 

18 SHARON, PA 177 LIMA, OH $10.28 

18 SHARON, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $10.09 

18 SHARON, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $11.15 

18 SHARON, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $9.14 

18 SHARON, PA 181 WHEELING, WV $9.75 

18 SHARON, PA 182 CHILLI CO THE, OH $10.71 

18 SHARON, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $9.43 

18 SHARON, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $11.60 

18 SHARON, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $7.31 

18 SHARON, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $8.82 

18 SHARON, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $13.82 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $15.16 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $14.73 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $14.44 

124 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $14.71 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $13.21 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 46 DOVER, DE $13.42 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $12.49 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $14.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $12.89 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $14.78 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $13.12 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $18.83 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $11.09 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $10.54 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 114 SALISBURY, MD $14.27 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $11.94 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $12.85 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $14.46 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 122 GRAND RAP IDS, MI $14.06 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $12.64 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $13.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $14.18 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $12.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $12.83 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $13.95 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $17.41 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $12.08 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $15.35 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $12.91 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $13.21 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $12.11 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $16.98 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 166 RALEIGH, NC $14.44 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $13.57 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $13.02 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $14.23 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $12.23 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $12.19 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $11.02 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $11.24 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 177 LIMA, OH $12.34 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $10.64 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $11.30 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $11.26 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $10.22 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $11.74 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $10.45 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.75 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $11.62 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $7.57 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $13.63 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $13.14 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 225 RICHMOND, VA $13.95 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $13.63 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $9.90 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 232 GASSAWAY, WV $11.21 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $9.67 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 234 CHARLESTON, WV $12.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $10.07 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 236 BECKLEY, wv $13.25 

20 SOMERSET, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $15.16 

20 SOMERSET, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $14.73 

20 SOMERSET, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $14.44 

20 SOMERSET, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $14.71 

20 SOMERSET, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $13.21 

20 SOMERSET, PA 46 DOVER, DE $13.42 

20 SOMERSET, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $12.49 

20 SOMERSET, PA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $14.78 

20 SOMERSET, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $12.87 

20 SOMERSET, PA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $14.78 20 SOMERSET, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $13.12 20 SOMERSET, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $11.09 20 SOMERSET, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $10.54 20 SOMERSET, PA 114 SALISBURY, MD $14.27 20 SOMERSET, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $11.94 20 SOMERSET, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $12.85 20 SOMERSET, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $14.46 20 SOMERSET, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $14.06 20 SOMERSET, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $12.64 20 SOMERSET, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $13.80 20 SOMERSET, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $14.18 20 SOMERSET, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $12.61 20 SOMERSET, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $12.83 20 SOMERSET, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $13.95 20 SOMERSET, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $12.08 20 SOMERSET, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $12.89 20 SOMERSET, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $13.21 20 SOMERSET, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $12. 11 20 SOMERSET, PA 166 RALEIGH, NC $14.44 20 SOMERSET, PA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $13.57 20 SOMERSET, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $13.00 20 SOMERSET, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $14.23 20 SOMERSET, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $12.23 20 SOMERSET, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $12. 19 20 SOMERSET, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $11.02 20 SOMERSET, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $11.24 

Tablf'S 125 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 • $/TON) 

20 SOMERSET, PA 177 LIMA, OH $12.34 

20 SOMERSET, PA 178 DUBOIS. PA $10.64 

20 SOMERSET, PA 179 PARKER"SBURG, wv $11.30 

20 SOMERSET, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $11.26 

20 SOMERSET, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $10.22 

20 SOMERSET, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $11.74 

20 SOMERSET, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $10.43 

20 SOMERSET, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.75 

20 SOMERSET, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $11.62 

20 SOMERSET, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $7.57 

20 SOMERSET, PA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $13.63 

20 SOMERSET, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $13.14 

20 SOMERSET, PA 225 RICHMOND, VA $13.95 

20 SOMERSET, PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $13.63 

20 SOMERSET, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $9.90 

20 SOMERSET, PA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $11.21 

20 SOMERSET, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $9.67 

20 SOMERSET, PA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $12.59 

20 SOMERSET, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $10.07 

20 SOMERSET, PA 236 BECKLEY, wv $13.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 3 GADSDEN, AL $12.93 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $13.48 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 7 DECATUR, AL $13.40 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 41 NORWICH, CT $17.45 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT $17.04 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 43 NEW YORK, NY $16.75 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 44 TORRINGTON, CT $17 .oo 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 45 PHILAOEPHIA. PA $15.37 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 46 DOVER, DE $15.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 47 WASHINGTON, DC $13.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 52 TAMPA, FL $20.63 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 55 CHATTANOOGA , TN $11.53 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 58 SAVANNAH, GA $16.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 65 PEORIA, IL $12.68 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 66 DANVILLE, IL $13.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 67 CHICAGO, IL $14.42 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 72 PADUCAH, KY $14.80 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 76 MUNCIE, IN $11.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $13.36 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $10.01 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH $8.71 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 80 INO I A NAPOLI S, IN $12.19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $12.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $13.63 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $12.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $13.29 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 101 HAZARD, KY $9.84 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 102 LEXINGTON, KY $9.12 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $7.40 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $9.96 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $11.05 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 112 FREDERICK, MD $13.19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $12.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 115 BALTIMORE, MD $13.99 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $13.86 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 119 BOSTON, MA $18.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $18.17 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $12. 19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 123 DETROIT, Ml $10.81 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 124 TOLEDO, OH $11.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $11.96 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 126 MARQUETTE, MI $17.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 136 GREENSBORO, NC $14.99 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, Nu $15.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA $16.56 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 158 SYRACUSE, NY $20.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 159 BURLINGTON, VT $13.82 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 160 ROCHESTER, NY $18.13 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 161 ALBANY, NY $14.37 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $14.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 164 OLEAN, NY $13.84 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 165 HICKORY, NC $13.44 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 166 RALEIGH, NC $11.45 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $12.53 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $10.37 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $11.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 170 WILMINGTON, NC $13.08 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $11.00 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 173 DAYTON, OH $8.80 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 174 CLEVELAND, OH $11.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 175 MANSFIELD, OH $9.22 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.29 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 177 LIMA, OH $9.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 178 DUBOIS, PA $13.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $8.69 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 180 SANDUSKY, OH $10.01 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 181 WHEELING, wv $10.11 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $7.63 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $7.95 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 195 ALTOONA, PA $13.17 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 196 HARRISBURG, PA $13.91 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $9.29 

126 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 198 SUMTER, sc $13.06 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 199 CHARLESTON, sc $14.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 200 COLUMBIA, sc $13.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 201 FLORENCE, sc $12.57 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $11.79 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 203 GREENWOOD, sc $12.85 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $13.74 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $12.72 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 208 NASHVILLE. TN $14.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $11.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA $14.27 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $13.14 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA $12.91 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 226 ROANOKE, VA $11.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 231 ELKINS, wv $9.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 232 GASSAWAY, wv $8.03 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $11.89 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv $6.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, WV $9.79 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 236 BECKLEY, wv $8.01 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $13.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 240 MADISON, WI $13.78 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 2 COLUMBUS, GA $14.76 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 3 GADSDEN, AL $11.11 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $11.66 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 7 DECATUR, AL $11.13 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 18 MEMPHIS, TN $14.78 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 41 NORWICH, CT $10.85 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT $10.43 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 43 NEW YORK, NV $10.13 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 44 TORRINGTON, CT $10.41 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $8.90 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 46 DOVER, DE $9.12 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 47 WASHINGTON, DC $8.18 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 53 AUGUSTA, GA $13.29 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 54 MACON, GA $14.42 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $9.71 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 56 ATLANTA, GA $14.01 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 57 ATHENS, GA $13.63 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 58 SAVANNAH, GA $14.39 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 65 PEORIA, IL $9.24 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 66 DANVILLE, IL $10.07 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 67 CHICAGO, IL $10.71 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $12.34 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 71 LASALLE, IL $11.81 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 72 PADUCAH, KV $12.47 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 73 ROCKFORD, IL $11.94 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 74 MARION, IL $12.23 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $11.85 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 76 MUNCIE, IN $8.37 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $10.88 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, KV $7.53 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5.60 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $8.78 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $8.48 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $9.77 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $9.60 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $9.86 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 101 HAZARD, KV $8.03 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 102 LEXINGTON, K't' $7.29 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $5.60 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KV $7.63 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.71 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 1()7 LEWISTON, ME $14.52 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 110 PORTLAND, ME $13.86 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 112 FREDERICK, MO $6.78 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $6.23 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 114 SALISBURY, MD $9.96 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 115 BALTIMORE, MD $7.63 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $8.54 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $10.49 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 118 WORCESTER, MA $11.62 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 119 BOSTON, MA $12.23 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $11.58 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 121 MANCHESTER, NH $12.66 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 122 GRAND RAPIDS, Ml $8.18 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 123 DETROIT, MI $6.74 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 124 TOLEDO, OH $7.91 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $8.10 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 126 MARQUETTE, MI $13.31 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 134 GREENVILLE, MS $14.35 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 135 TUPELO, MS $12.70 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 136 GREENSBORO, NC $11.85 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $8.31 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $9.37 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA $10.71 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 158 SYRACUSE, NV $13.91 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 159 BURLINGTON, VT $8.14 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 160 ROCHESTER, NV $11.53 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 161 ALBANY, NV $8.95 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 162 BUFFALO, NV $9.96 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 163 BINGHAMTON, NV $8.16 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 164 OLEAN, NV $11.85 

Tables 127 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 165 HICKORY, NC $10.66 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 166 RALEIGH, NC $9.31 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $9.26 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $7.89 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $9.09 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 170 WILMINGTON, NC $10.30 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $9.50 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 173 DAYTON, OH $5.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 174 CLEVELAND, OH $6.83 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 175 MANSFIELD, OH $5.13 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 176 COLUMBUS, OH $4.43 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 177 LIMA, OH $5.75 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 178 DUBOIS, PA $6.70 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $3.77 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 180 SANDUSKY, OH $5.55 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 181 WHEELING, wv $4.03 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $4.22 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $4.05 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 195 ALTOONA, PA $6.51 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 196 HARRISBURG, PA $7.31 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $3.03 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 198 SUMTER, sc $10.85 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 199 CHARLESTON, sc $11.87 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 200 COLUMBIA, sc $10.98 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 201 FLORENCE, sc $10.37 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $10.28 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 203 GREENWOOD, sc $11.19 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $11.24 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $11.07 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 208 NASHVILLE, TN $11.91 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 209 J-ACKSON, TN $13.67 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 221 MONTPELIER, VT $12.95 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $8.50 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA $10.98 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $8.84 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA $9.65 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 226 ROANOKE, VA $8.50 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 231 ELKINS, wv $3.60 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 232 GASSAWAY, wv $4.30 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $5.36 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv $5.70 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $2.54 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 236 BECKLEY, WV $6.95 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 237 GREEN BAY, WI $12.36 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 238 WAUSAU, WI $12.72 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $9.50 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 240 MADISON, WI $10.09 

23 PHILIPPI, WV 41 NORWICH, CT $14.25 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT $13.84 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 43 NEW YORK, NY $13.55 

23 PHILIPPI, WV 44 TORRINGTON, CT $13.80 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $12.30 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 46 DOVER, DE $12.51 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 41 WASHINGTON, DC $11.60 

23 \ PHILIPPI, wv 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $13.55 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 65 PEORIA, IL $13.27 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 66 DANVILLE, IL $14.12 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 67 CHICAGO, IL $14.76 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 76 MUNCIE, IN $12.40 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 78 LOUISVILLE. KY $11.55 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH $9.65 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $12.80 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $12.51 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $13.80 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $13.65 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $13.91 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 101 HAZARD, KY $11.87 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 102 LEXINGTON, KY $11.15 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $9.41 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $11.66 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $12.76 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 112 FREDERICK, MD $10.18 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $9.62 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 114 SALISBURY, MD $13.36 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 115 BALTIMORE, MD $11.02 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $11.94 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $13.91 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 119 BOSTON, MA $15.62 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $14.97 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 122 GRAND RAP IDS, Ml $11.96 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 123 DETROIT, MI $10.54 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 124 TOLEDO, OH $11.70 23 PHILIPPI, wv 125 KALAMAZOO. MI $12.08 23 PHILIPPI, wv 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $11.70 23 PHILIPPI, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $12.78 23 PHILIPPI, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA $14.18 23 PHILIPPI, wv 159 BURLINGTON, VT $11.72 23 PHILIPPI, wv 161 ALBANY, NY $12.55 23 PHILIPPI, wv 162 BUFFALO, NY $13.42 23 PHILIPPI, wv 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $11.74 23 PHILIPPI, wv 164 OLEAN, NY $14.82 23 PHILIPPI, wv 165 HICKORY, NC $13.63 23 PHILIPPI, wv 166 RALEIGH, NC $12.27 

128 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $12.61 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $10.85 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $12.06 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 170 WILMINGTON, NC $13.27 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $13.02 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 173 DAYTON, OH $9.41 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 174 CLEVELAND, OH $10.60 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 175 MANSFIELD, OH $8.93 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.46 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 177 LIMA, OH $9.77 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 178 DUBOIS, PA $10.30 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $7.80 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 180 SANDUSKY, OH $9.33 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 181 WHEELING, wv $7.80 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8.25 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $7.89 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.96 

23 PHI LIPPI, wv 196 HARRISBURG, PA $10.71 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $6.64 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 198 SUMTER, sc $13.82 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 200 COLUMBIA, sc $13.93 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 201 FLORENCE, sc $13.33 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $13.44 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 203 GREENWOOD, sc $14.14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $14.20 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $14.76 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $11.47 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA $14.33 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $12.23 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA $13.00 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 226 ROANOKE, VA $11.47 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 231 ELKINS, wv $6.57 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 232 GASSAWAY, wv $7.27 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $8.76 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv $8.65 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $6.59 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 236 BECKLEY, wv $9.92 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $13.55 

23 PHILIPP I, wv 240 MADISON, WI $14. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $2. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $2. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $2.12 

26 PEORIA, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $2. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $2. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $3.24 

26 PEORIA, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $2. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 74 MARION, IL $1.89 

26 PEORIA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $2. 12 

26 PEORIA, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $2 18 

26 PEORIA, IL 17 EVANSVILLE, IN $2.46 

26 PEORIA, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $5.55 

26 PEORIA, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5.81 

26 PEORIA, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $1.29 

26 PEORIA, IL 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $2.42 

26 PEORIA, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $1 29 

26 PEORIA, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $2.01 

26 PEORIA, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $0.42 

26 PEORIA, IL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $18.83 

26 PEORIA, IL 122 GRAND RAP IDS. Ml $5.85 

26 PEORIA, IL 124 TOLEDO, OH $4.79 

26 PEORIA, IL 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $4.37 

26 PEORIA, IL 136 GREENSBORO, NC $5.00 

26 PEORIA, IL 173 DAYTON, (]H $5.66 

26 PEORIA, IL 177 LIMA, OH $5.41 

26 PEORIA, IL 209 JACKSON, TN $5.77 

26 PEORIA, IL 237 GREEN BAY, WI $4.83 

26 PEORIA, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $3.77 

26 PEORIA, IL 240 MADISON, WI $3.39 

27 OTTAWA, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $4.75 

27 OTTAWA, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $3.33 

27 OTTAWA, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $1.67 

27 OTTAWA, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $3.43 

27 OTTAWA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $10.35 

27 OTTAWA, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $4.92 

27 OTTAWA, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $6. 13 

27 OTTAWA, IL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $24.89 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $4.66 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $2.52 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $4.88 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $1.91 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $3.29 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $4.85 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $5.05 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 74 MARION, IL $3.50 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $2.20 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $5.70 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $4. 18 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $4.62 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $6.02 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $4.60 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $2.82 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $20.42 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 3 GADSDEN, AL $10.09 

Tab~~s 129 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $9.71 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 7 DECATUR, AL $7.93 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 18 MEMPHIS, TN $2 97 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 19 MONROE, LA $48.55 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 20 JONESBORO, AR $12. 19 

29 MT VERNON, IL 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $25 40 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 51 FT. MEYER, FL $24.25 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 52 TAMPA, FL $22.79 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $8.90 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 56 ATLANTA, GA $9.79 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $3.60 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $3.43 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $3.18 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 69 DAVENPORT, IA $3.71 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MD $2. 12 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $3.67 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $2.12 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $3.71 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 74 MARION, IL $2. 12 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $3.92 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $3.14 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $2. 12 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $2.63 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5.19 29 MT. VERNON, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $3.56 29 MT. VERNON, IL 81 FT WAYNE, IN $4.49 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $4.30 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $3.43 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $2. 12 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 101 HAZARD, KY $8.93 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 102 LEXINGTON, KY $4.37 

29 MT VERNON, IL 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $7.53 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $4. 13 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $4. 16 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $14.56 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $9.03 

29 MT VERNON, IL 123 DETROIT, MI $10.05 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 124 TOLEDO, OH $6 89 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $7 57 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI $48 59 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 134 GREENVILLE, MS $9.09 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 135 TUPELO, MS $6.68 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 136 GREENSBORO, NC $3.65 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 173 DAYTON, OH $6 13 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 174 CLEVELAND, OH $8. 88 

29 MT VERNON, IL 175 MANSFIELD, OH $8. 97 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 176 COLUMBUS, OH $7 .78 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 177 LIMA, OH $7 .02 

29 MT . VERNON, IL 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $9 .05 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 180 SANDUSKY, OH $9 22 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 181 WHEELING, wv $10 37 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $7 50 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $9 24 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $7 97 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN $2.61 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 209 JACKSON, TN $2.46 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 234 CHARLESTON, wv $8 80 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 237 GREEN BAY, WI $8 82 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $5 77 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 240 MADISON, WI $7 87 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 66 DANVILLE. IL $2 .93 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $5 41 

30 TUSCOLA, JL 70 ST LOUIS, MO $4. 90 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 71 LASALLE, !L $4 96 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 74 MARION, IL $5.62 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $4.35 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $5.96 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $5.49 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $4.71 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $6.53 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $5.00 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $3.24 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI $52.32 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $7.55 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 240 MADISON, WI $10.88 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 3 GADSDEN, AL $9.37 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $8.84 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 5 MOBILE, AL $12.85 

31 HARRISBURG, IL DECATUR, AL $7.06 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 18 MEMPHIS, TN $4.66 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 55 CHATTANOOGA. TN $8. 18 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 56 ATLANTA, GA $9.07 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $4.85 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 66 DANVILLE. IL $4 03 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $4.05 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 70 ST LOUIS, MO $2 69 

31 HARRISBURG. IL 71 LASALLE, IL $3 20 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $2 12 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $4 .96 

31 HARRISBURG. IL 74 MARION, IL $2 12 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD. Il. $2 40 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $3 03 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 77 EVANSVILLE. IN $2 12 

130 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $2 52 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5 09 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $4 45 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 81 FT WAYNE, IN $4 71 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $4 71 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $3 43 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $3 10 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 101 HAZARD, KY $8 82 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 102 LEXINGTON, KY $4 28 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $7 44 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 104 ELIZABETHTOWN. KY $3 65 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $3 69 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $9 71 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 123 DETROIT, MI $10 11 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 124 TOLEDO, OH $6. 95 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $7 .97 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI $13 .99 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 134 GREENVILLE. MS $8 20 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 135 TUPELO, MS $5. 81 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 136 GREENSBORO, NC $4 88 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 173 DAYTON, OH $6 .02 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 174 CLEVELAND, OH $8. 80 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 175 MANSFIELD, OH $8 .88 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 176 COLUMBUS, OH $7 .70 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 177 LIMA, OH $6 91 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 179 PARKERSBURG. wv $8 95 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 180 SANDUSKY, OH $9 14 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 181 WHEELING, wv $10.26 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $7 42 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $9 16 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $7.36 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN $4 62 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 209 JACKSON, TN $3 58 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 234 CHARLESTON, wv $8 69 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 237 GREEN BAY, WI $9.69 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 238 WAUSAU, WI $12 17 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $8. 16 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 240 MADISON, WI $9 12 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 18 MEMPHIS, TN $10 52 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 65 PEORIA, IL $9 16 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 66 DANVILLE, IL $3 84 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 67 CHICAGO, IL $6. 87 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 70 ST LOUIS, MO $5 .85 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 71 LASALLE. I L $7.29 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 72 PADUCAH, KV $6 55 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 73 ROCKFORD, IL $8.65 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 74 MARION, IL $5.85 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 75 SPR INGF I ELO. I L $6 68 

32 SULLIVAN. IN 76 MUNCIE, IN $5 62 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 77 EVANSVILLE. IN $3 88 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $6 78 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 79 CINCINNATI, OH $8 29 

32 SULLIVAN, IN so I NO I A NAPOLI S, IN $4 26 

32 SULLlVAN, IN 81 FT WAYNE, IN $7.08 

32 SULLlVAN, IN 82 SOUTH BEND. IN $7 08 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $3. 18 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $2.44 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8 52 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $8.33 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $9.37 

32 SULLIVAN. IN 122 GRANO RAPIDS. MI $12 08 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 124 TOLEDO, OH $9 48 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $10 35 

32 SULLIVAN. IN 131 MINNEAPOLIS. MN $16 98 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 173 DAYTON. OH $8 61 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 176 COLUMBUS, OH $10 28 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 177 LIMA, OH $9 50 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $10 56 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 208 NASHVILLE, TN $7.82 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 209 JACKSON, TN $9 07 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 237 GREEN BAY, WI $12 49 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 238 WAUSAU. WI $14 97 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 240 MADISON, WI $12 64 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $10 24 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $16 24 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY DECATUR. Al $8 25 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 18 MEMPHIS. TN $5 47 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA. TN $9 05 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $9 94 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 65 PEORIA. IL $8 16 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 66 DANVILLE. I L $3 46 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 67 CHICAGO, IL $6 49 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 70 ST LOUIS. MO $3 48 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 71 LASALLE, IL $6 34 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $1 29 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 73 ROCKFORD. IL $8 10 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 74 MARION, IL $2 31 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, I l. $5 70 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 76 MUNCIE, IN $5 05 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE. IN $2 12 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $3 90 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 79 C INC INNA TI OH $6 89 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS. 11\i $3 69 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 81 FT WAYNE, lN $6 81 

Ta~les 131 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP DEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 82 SOUTH BEND. IN $6 81 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $2 48 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE. [N $2 16 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $10.20 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 102 LE>'INGTON, KY $5 66 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $8 82 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $4 26 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $4 30 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $8.95 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $10.07 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 135 TUPELO, MS $9 20 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 136 GREENSBORO. NC $8.78 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $8.03 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $9.65 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 177 LIMA, OH $8.93 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $9.22 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $8 23 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $2 76 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 209 JACKSON, TN $4.03 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $10.07 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $8.08 34 MADISONVILLE. KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $8 48 34 MADISONVILLE. KY 5 MOBILE, AL $14 69 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $6 .08 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN $3.92 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $21.56 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $6.89 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $7 78 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL $7 89 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 66 DANVILLE, IL $3 16 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 67 CHICAGO, IL $6 19 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $3 18 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 71 LASALLE. IL $6 04 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $2 12 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 73 ROCKFORq, IL $7.80 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 74 MARION, IL $1.23 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $5 41 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 76 MUNCIE, IN $4.75 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $2. 12 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE. KY $3 12 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 79 C INC I NNA Tl , OH $6.11 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 80 I NO I ANA POLlS, IN $3.39 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $6.53 

34 MADISONVILLE. KY 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $6 53 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $2. 18 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE. IN $3.39 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $9.16 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $4.60 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 103 HUNT! NGTON, wv $7.76 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN. KY $2.54 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN. KY $2.06 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $11.51 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $8.67 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 135 TUPELO, MS $7.65 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 136 GREENSBORO, NC $8.48 

34 MfiDISONVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $7.34 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS. OH $8.86 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 177 LIMA, OH $8.63 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8 42 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $6.06 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $2.54 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 209 JACKSON, TN $2 48 

34 MADISONVILLE. KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9 .. 03 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $11.83 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 238 WAUSAU, WI $14 31 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $10.30 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 240 MADISON, WI $11 96 

37 MARSHALL, TX 16 LITTLE ROCK. AI<: $4.54 

37 MARSHALL, TX 17 FT SMITH, AR $5 49 

37 MARSHALL, TX 19 MONROE, LA $2 95 

37 MARSHALL, T)( 20 JONESBORO, AR $7 36 

37 MARSHALL, TX 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $6 64 

37 MARSHALL. TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $2 12 

37 MARSHALL, TX 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $7 00 

37 MARSHALL, TX 186 TULSA, OK $7 80 

37 MARSHALL, rx 188 MCALESTER, OK $5 64 

37 MARSHALL. TX 189 LAWTON, OK $6 89 

37 MARSHALL, TX 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $6 23 

37 MARSHALL, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $6 .00 

37 MARSHALL, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $3 20 

37 MARSHALL, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $5 38 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 16 LITTLE ROCK, A~ $4 41 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 17 FT. SMITH, AR $4 66 

38 MT PLEASANT. TX 19 MONROE, LA $4 37 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 20 JONESBORO, AR $7 23 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $5 98 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $1 02 

38 MT. PLEASANT. TX 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $8 76 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $5 81 38 MT PLEASANT, TX 185 ENID, OK $7.65 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 186 TULSA, OK $6.61 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 188 MCALESTER, OK $4.30 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 189 LAWTON, OK $5.70 

132 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG ~ SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $5 .05 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 211 AMARILLO, TX $9 75 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $6 42 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 213 LAREDO, TX $11 38 

38 MT PLEASANT, TX 214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX $10. 24 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $1 23 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $5. 83 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $8 12 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $8.35 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $11 74 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 17 FT. SMITH, AR $11.30 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 19 MONROE, LA $10.98 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $12.61 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $12.64 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 86 SIOUX CITY, !A $12 51 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $11 77 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 153 EL PASO, TX $7.02 

39- FAIRFIELD, TX 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $6 59 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 185 ENID, OK $6.55 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 186 TULSA, OK $9.07 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 187 BOISE CITY, OK $2 86 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 188 MCALESTER, OK $9 12 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 189 LAWTON, OK $5 79 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $5 49 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 211 AMARILLO, TX $2 12 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $12.00 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $8.54 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $11.45 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $11.64 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $7.53 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $2. 12 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 213 LAREDO, TX $3 18 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX $3. 18 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $5.94 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $4 24 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $2 12 

40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $7 63 

43 POTEAU, OK 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $3 71 

43 POTEAU, OK 17 FT SMITH, AR $1.72 

43 POTEAU, OK 19 MONROE, LA $5.96 

43 POTEAU, OK 20 JONESBORO, AR $5.66 

43 POTEAU, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $2.59 

43 POTEAU, OK 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $4.66 

43 POTEAU, OK 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $6.85 

43 POTEAU, OK 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $4.05 

43 POTEAU, OK 185 ENID, OK $5.00 

43 POTEAU, OK 186 TULSA, OK $1 93 

43 POTEAU, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK $2 35 

43 POTEAU, OK 189 LAWTON, OK $5 32 

43 POTEAU, OK 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $5.51 

43 POTEAU, OK 211 AMARILLO, TX $6. 17 

43 POTEAU, OK 215 DALLAS, TX $4 75 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 17 FT SMITH, AR $1 .70 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $2. 86 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 68 DUBUQUE, IA $16. 22 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $4 .47 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 98 WICHITA, KS $4. 52 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $10. 22 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $24 32 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 145 LINCOLN, NE $9. 75 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $3. 33 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 185 ENID, OK $2. 42 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 186 TULSA, OK $2 12 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK $1 31 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 17 FT SMITH, AR $2. 18 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $3.01 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $2 27 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 98 WICHITA, KS $3 54 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $22 .58 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $2 93 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 185 ENID, OK $2 .73 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 186 TULSA, OK $2 12 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 188 MCALESTER, OK $2 23 

48 CLINTON, MD 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $1 59 

48 CLINTON, MD 98 WICHITA, KS $9 94 

48 CLINTON, MD 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $22 49 

48 CLINTON, MD 186 TULSA, OK $1 .25 

49 MACON, MD 65 PEORIA, IL $2 06 

49 MACON, MD 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $4.22 

49 MACON, MD 88 WATERLOO, IA $10.22 

49 MACON, MD 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $2 57 

49 MACON, MD 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD $11 11 

49 MACON, MD 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $22 96 

49 MACON, MD 186 TULSA, OK $3.46 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 98 WICHITA, KS $4 24 

56 ALBIA, IA 65 PEORIA, IL $1 59 

56 ALBIA, IA 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $2.63 

56 ALBIA, IA 88 WATERLOO, IA $5.30 

56 ALBIA, IA 92 DES MOINES, IA $4 24 

56 ALBIA, IA 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $3.10 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $9.26 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $2. 12 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 15 PHOENIX, AZ $3.48 

Ta~l~s 133 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $17.64 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $5.79 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 38 PUEBLO, co $5.60 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $6. 11 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 153 EL PASO, TX $3.24 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $6.34 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 155 CLOVIS, NM $1.74 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 156 SOCORRO NM $4.37 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 157 SANTE FE, NM $3 14 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 211 AMARILLO, TX $3.96 

61 RATON, NM 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $27.31 

61 RATON, NM 36 DENVER, co $6.23 

61 RATON, NM 38 PUEBLO, co $2.46 

61 .RATON, NM 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $23.32 

61 RATON, NM 148 RENO, NV $11.26 

61 RATON, NM 153 EL PASO, TX $2.35 

61 RATON, NM 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $7.78 

61 RATON, NM 155 CLOVIS, NM $7.21 

61 RATON, NM 156 SOCORRO NM $4.11 

61 RATON, NM 157 SANTE FE, NM $4.58 

61 RATON, NM 187 BOISE CITY, OK $5.09 

61 RATON, NM 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $8.48 

61 RATON, NM 211 AMARILLO, TX $5.30 

62 GUNNISON, co 12 LORDSBURG, NM $12.32 

62 GUNNISON, co 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $15.71 

62 GUNNISON, co 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $13.10 

62 GUNNISON, co 15 PHOENIX, AZ $16.37 

62 GUNNISON, co 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $27.64 

62 GUNNISON, co 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $17.28 

62 GUNNISON, co 34 LA JUNTA, co $6.36 

62 GUNNISON, co 35 GRAND JUNCTION, CO $10.37 

62 GUNNISON, co 36 DENVER, co $6.44 

62 GUNNISON, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $10.26 

62 GUNNISON, co 61 POCATELLO, ID $17.02 

62 GUNNISON, co 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $18.70 

62 GUNNISON, co 144 MISSOULA, MT $16.28 

62 GUNNISON, co 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $20.22 

62 GUNNISON, co 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $18.74 

62 GUNNISON, co 148 RENO, NV $33.60 

62 GUNNISON, co 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $11.47 

62 GUNNISON, co 153 EL PASO, TX $4.45 

62 GUNNISON, co 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $9.05 

62 GUNNISON, co 155 CLOVIS, NM $9.54 

62 GUNNISON, co 156 SOCORRO NM $7.44 

62 GUNNISON, co 157 SANTE FE, NM $8.14 

62 GUNNISON, co 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $9.37 

62 GUNNISON, co 185 ENID, OK $8. 12 

62 GUNNISON, co 186 TULSA, OK $8. 18 

62 GUNNISON, co 187 BOISE CITY, OK $6.59 

62 GUNNISON, co 188 MCALESTER, OK $11.07 

62 GUNNISON, co 189 LAWTON, OK $9. 14 

62 GUNNISON, co 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $8.95 

62 GUNNISON, co 211 AMARILLO, TX $3.99 

62 GUNNISON, co 212 AUSTIN, TX $13.33 

62 GUNNISON, co 213 LAREDO, TX $16.68 

62 GUNNISON, co 214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX $16.30 

62 GUNNISON, co 215 DALLAS, TX $11.00 

62 GUNNISON, co 216 HOUSTON, TX $14.29 

62 GUNNISON, co 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $14.48 

62 GUNNISON, co 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $10.32 

62 GUNNISON, co 219 MORGAN, UT $11.43 

62 GUNNISON, co 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $10.56 

62 GUNNISON, co 241 CASPER, WY $14.69 

62 GUNNISON, co 242 CHEYENNE, WY $7.21 

62 GUNNISON, co 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $15.62 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $3.48 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 148 RENO, NV $42.40 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 153 EL PASO, TX $10.60 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 187 BOISE CITY, OK $10.07 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 211 AMARILLO, TX $12.72 66 RAWLINS, WY 12 LORDSBURG, NM $16.51 

66 RAWLINS, WY 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $14.33 

66 RAWLINS, WY 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $17.30 

66 RAWLINS, WY 16 LITTLE ROCK , AR $17.13 

66 RAWLINS, WY 17 FT. SMITH, AR $14.92 

66 RAWLINS, WY 20 JONESBORO, AI< $16.96 

66 RAWLINS, WY 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $15.75 

66 RAWLINS, WY 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $17.96 

66 RAWLINS, wv 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $15.90 

66 RAWLINS, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $9.54 

66 RAWLINS, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $14.84 

66 RAWLINS, WY 36 DENVER, co $7.31 

66 RAWLINS, WY 37 GREELEY, co $10.15 

66 RAWLINS, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $4.52 

66 RAWLINS, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $11.02 

66 RAWLINS, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $13.63 

66 RAWLINS, WY 61 POCATELLO, ID $5.94 

66 RAWLINS, WY 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $14.10 

66 RAWLINS, WY 64 BOISE, ID $15.79 

66 RAWLINS, WY 65 PEORIA, IL $14.59 

66 RAWLINS, WY 85 OMAHA, NE $14.78 

66 RAWLINS, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $10.03 

66 RAWLINS, WY 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $18.91 

134 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG N SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

66 RAWLINS, WY 90 SPENCER, IA $18.95 

66 RAWLINS, WY 92 DES MOINES, lA $18.93 

66 RAWLINS, WY 93 CRESTON, lA $18.32 

66 RAWLINS, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $12.27 

66 RAWLINS, WY 95 SALINA, KS $17.09 

66 RAWLINS, WY 96 TOPEKA, KS $17.70 

66 RAWLINS, WY 97 OAKLEY, KS $14.50 

66 RAWLINS, WY 98 WICHITA, KS $18.19 

66 RAWLINS, WY 100 DODGE CITY, KS $16.35 

66 RAWLINS, WY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $19.00 

66 RAWLINS, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI $15.58 

66 RAWLINS, WY 129 DULUTH, MN $15.77 

66 RAWLINS, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $17.34 

66 RAWLINS, WY 140 BILLINGS, MT $18.63 

66 RAWLINS, WY 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $17.24 

66 RAWLINS, WY 143 MILES CITY, MT $17.70 

66 RAWLINS. WY 144 MISSOULA, MT $16.30 

66 RAWLINS, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $11.87 

66 RAWLINS, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $16.64 

66 RAWLINS, WY 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $15.14 

66 RAWLINS, WY 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $15.67 

66 RAWLINS, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $8.65 

66 RAWLINS, WY 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $13.25 

66 RAWLINS, WY 155 CLOVIS, NM $13.74 

66 RAWLINS, WY 156 SOCORRO NM $11.64 

66 RAWLINS, WY 157 SANTE FE, NM $12.34 

66 RAWLINS, WY 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $13.46 

66 RAWLINS, WY 185 ENID, OK $12.30 

66 RAWLINS, WY 186 TULSA, OK $11.98 

66 RAWLINS, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $8.20 

66 RAWLINS, WY 188 MCALESTER, OK $14.86 

66 RAWLINS, WY 189 LAWTON, OK $13.33 

66 RAWLINS, WY 191 PENDLETON, OR $17.79 

66 RAWLINS, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $11.66 

66 RAWLINS, WY 206 PIERRE, so $8.27 

66 RAWLINS, WY 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $13.14 

66 RAWLINS, WY 211 AMARILLO, TX $8.18 

66 RAWLINS, WY 212 AUSTIN, TX $17.53 

66 RAWLINS, WY 215 DALLAS, TX $15.20 

66 RAWLINS, WY 216 HOUSTON, TX $18.49 

66 RAWLINS, WY 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $18.68 

66 RAWLINS. WY 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $14.52 

66 RAWLINS, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $7.04 

66 RAWLINS, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $7.91 

66 RAWLINS, WY 241 CASPER, WY $12.64 

66 RAWLINS, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $9.54 

66 RAWLINS, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $8.69 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTV, WY 36 DENVER, CO $11.72 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $8.93 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL $15.41 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTV, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $25.29 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTV, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $9.29 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 92 DES MOINES, IA $12.87 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $13.46 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 129 DULUTH, MN $14.46 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $12.11 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 142 HELENA, MT $13.84 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $13.06 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 185 ENID, OK $13.84 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 186 TULSA. OK $13.40 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $12.61 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTV, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $12.51 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 206 PIERRE, so $8.48 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 211 AMARILLO, TX $12.59 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 241 CASPER, WY $13.48 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 242 CHEY.ENNE, WY $14.76 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $12.44 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 36 DENVER, co $8.84 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 37 GREELEY, co $11.66 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $10.60 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 61 POCATELLO, 10 $10.54 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 63 TWIN FALLS. ID $12.21 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $11.53 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $10.15 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $9.71 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 193 PORTLAND, OR $19.02 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 206 PIERRE, so $9.79 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 211 AMARILLO, TX $9.69 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $5. 15 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $6.00 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $11.05 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $6.81 

70 PRICE, UT 12 LORDSBURG, NM $23.32 

70 PRICE, UT 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $7.74 

70 PRICE, UT 14 FLAGSTAFF·, AZ $21.20 

70 PRICE, UT 15 PHOENIX, AZ $21.20 

70 PRICE, UT 23 LONE PINE, CA $17.38 

70 PRICE, UT 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $19.65 

70 PRICE, UT 25 SALINAS, CA $16.39 

70 PRICE, UT 27 WESTWOOD. CA $15.43 

70 PRICE, UT 28 SACRAMENTO, CA $16.98 

70 PRICE, UT 29 SAN DIEGO, CA $17.60 

70 PRICE, UT 30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA $18.23 

Tat'~ 135 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

70 PRICE, UT 31 FRESNO, CA $17.89 

70 PRICE, UT 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $15.37 

70 PRICE, UT 34 LA ~UNTA, co $12.85 

70 PRICE, UT 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $4.24 

70 PRICE, UT 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $8.01 

70 PRICE, UT 61 POCATELLO, ID $9.03 

70 PRICE, UT 62 SPOKANE, WA $15.94 

70 PRICE, UT 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $10.71 

70 PRICE, UT 64 BOISE, ID $12.40 

70 PRICE, UT 79 CINCINNATI, OH $33.92 

70 PRICE, UT 140 BILLINGS, MT $15.24 

70 PRICE, UT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $13.84 

70 PRICE, UT 142 HELENA, MT $18.27 

70 PRICE, UT 143 MILES CITY, MT $14.31 

70 PRICE, UT 144 MISSOULA, MT $18.06 

70 PRICE, UT 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $10.75 

70 PRICE, UT 152 ALBUQUERQU'E, NM $21.84 

70 PRICE, UT 153 EL PASO, TX $14.84 

70 PRICE, UT 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $12.66 

70 PRICE, UT 155 CLOVIS, NM $13.14 

70 PRICE, UT 156 SOCORRO NM $16.96 

70 PRICE, UT 157 SANTE FE, NM $42.40 

70 PRICE, UT 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $21.20 

70 PRICE, UT 185 ENID, OK $20.78 

70 PRICE, UT 186 TULSA, OK $21.41 

70 PRICE, UT 187 BOISE CITY, OK $7.61 

70 PRICE, UT 188 MCALESTER, OK $24.38 

70 PRICE, UT 189 LAWTON, OK $21.20 

70 PRICE, UT 190 BEND, OR $23.32 

70 PRICE, UT 191 PENDLETON, OR $14.39 

70 PRICE, UT 192 ASTORIA, OR $23.32 

70 PRICE, UT 193 PORTLAND, OR $17.51 

70 PRICE, UT 194 MEDFORD, OR $17.57 

70 PRICE, UT 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $21.20 

70 PRICE, UT 211 AMARILLO, TX $17.17 

70 PRICE, UT 212 AUSTIN, TX $25.44 

70 PRICE, UT 215 DALLAS, TX $24.38 

70 PRICE, UT 216 HOUSTON, TX $28.62 

70 PRICE, UT 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $29.15 

70 PRICE, UT 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $13.93 

70 PRICE, UT 219 MORGAN, UT $3.46 

70 PRICE, UT 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $2.59 

70 PRICE, UT 227 WENATCHEE, WA $17.49 

70 PRICE, UT 228 OLYMPIA, WA $23.32 

70 PRICE, UT 229 SEATILE, WA $21.73 

70 PRICE, UT 230 YAKIMA, WA $16.39 

70 PRICE, UT 241 CASPER, WY $15.84 

70 PRICE, UT 242 CHEYENNE, WY $12.74 

70 PRICE, UT 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $7.42 

75 FORSYTH, MT 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $10.01 

75 FORSYTH, MT 142 HELENA, MT $2.12 

75 FORSYTH, MT 206 PIERRE, so $11.87 

80 MINOT, NO 38 PUEBLO, co $19.40 

80 MINOT, NO 65 PEORIA, IL $14.84 

80 MINOT, NO 85 OMAHA, NE $11.77 

80 MINOT, NO 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $11.66 

80 MINOT, NO 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $11.45 

80 MINOT, NO 89 MASON CITY, IA $13.65 

80 MINOT, NO 90 SPENCER, IA $12.76 

80 MINOT, NO 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $13.78 

80 MINOT, NO 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $15.58 

80 MINOT, NO 126 MARQUETTE, MI $12.51 

80 MINOT, NO 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $12.08 

80 MINOT, NO 129 DULUTH, MN $13.14 

80 MINOT, NO 130 FARGO, NO $8.35 

80 MINOT, NO 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $12.93 

80 MINOT, NO 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $8.65 

80 MINOT, NO 133 WILLMAR, MN $10.54 

80 MINOT, NO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $11.49 

80 MINOT, NO 140 BILLINGS, MT $12.93 

80 MINOT, NO 142 HELENA, MT $9.39 

80 MINOT, NO 148 RENO, NV $26.58 

80 MINOT, NO 172 BISMARK, NO $7.72 

80 MINOT, NO 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $18.44 

80 MINOT, NO 185 ENID, OK $17.28 

80 MINOT, NO 186 TULSA, OK $17.81 

80 MINOT, NO 205 RAPID CITY, so $13.74 

80 MINOT, NO 206 PIERRE, so $9.33 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 27 WESTWOOD, CA $14.76 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 62 SPOKANE, WA $10.01 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 64 BOISE, ID $14.84 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 190 BEND, OR $9.50 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 191 PENDLETON, OR $9. 12 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 192 ASTORIA, OR $7.40 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 193 PORTLAND, OR $6.08 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 194 MEDFORD, OR $10.75 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 227 WENATCHEE, WA $8.27 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 228 OLYMPIA, WA $5.17 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 230 YAKIMA, WA $7.76 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 12 LORDSBURG, NM $8.48 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $14.84 

90 SAN vUAN CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $2 37 

90 SAN vUAN CTY, NM 15 PHOENIX, AZ $8.69 

136 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG N SUPPLY REGION REG N DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $13.55 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 17 FT. SMITH, AR $19.61 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 19 MONROE, LA $13.95 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 20 JONESBORO, Af( $15.48 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $12.57 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $12.59 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 23 LONE PINE, CA $16.37 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 25 SALINAS, CA $15.37 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 29 SAN DIEGO, CA $16.60 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 31 FRESNO, CA $16.90 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 32 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA $18.21 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 33 SAN BERNADINO. CA $13.04 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 34 LA JUNTA, co $12.32 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $17.21 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 36 DENVER, co $12.93 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 37 GREELEY, CO $14.90 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 38 PUEBLO, CO $10.60 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 39 ALAMOSA, co $12.87 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $16.90 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 65 PEORIA, IL $15.65 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 85 OMAHA, NE $17.98 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 86 SIOUX CITY. lA $13.72 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $12.51 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 95 SALINA, KS $16.64 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 96 TOPEKA, KS $17.94 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 97 OAKLEY, KS $16.60 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 98 WICHITA, KS $16.24 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 99 PITTSBURG, KS $18.57 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 100 DODGE CITY, KS $14.65 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $18.15 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $17.38 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, .NM 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $7.63 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 153 EL PASO, TX $6.36 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $6.04 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 155 CLOVIS, NM $0.57 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 156 SOCORRO NM $3.20 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 157 SANTE FE, NM $8.48 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 206 PIERRE, so $13.55 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 219 MORGAN, UT $18.10 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $17.43 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 241 CASPER, WY $18.83 

90 SAN JUAN CTY. NM 242 CHEYENNE, WY $15.71 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 12 LORDSBURG, NM $6.30 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $3.96 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 15 PHOENIX, AZ $6.81 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $20.95 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 38 PUEBLO, co $8.48 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $5.77 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 153 EL PASO, TX $2.90 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $6.00 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 155 CLOVIS, NM $1.40 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 156 SOCORRO NM $4.03 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 157 SANTE FE, NM $2.82 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 187 BOISE CITY, OK $9.54 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 211 AMARILLO, TX $8.48 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $12.72 

92 CARBON CTY. WY 12 LORDSBURG, NM $16.85 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 13 LAS VEGAS. NV $14.69 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $17.64 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 16 LITTLE ROCK, A~ $17.49 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 17 FT. SMITH, AR $15.29 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 20 JONESBORO, A~ $17.32 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 21 CLARKSVILLE, A it $16.09 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $18.32 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $16.24 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $13.80 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $15.18 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 36 DENVER, CO $7.67 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 37 GREELEY, co $8.90 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 38 PUEBLO, CO $8.27 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $14.76 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $13.99 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 61 POCATELLO, 10 $8.90 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 63 TWIN FALLS, 10 $14.46 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 64 BOISE, 10 $16.15 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL $14.95 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $25.33 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $24.36 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 85 OMAHA, NE $15.12 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $15.37 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 93 CRESTON, lA $18.68 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $12.64 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 95 SALINA, KS $17.45 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 96 TOPEKA, KS $18.04 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 97 OAKLEY, KS $14.84 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 98 WICHITA, KS $18.53 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 100 DODGE CITY. KS $16.68 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI $15.92 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 129 DULUTH, MN $16.13 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD. MO $17.70 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 140 BILLINGS, MT $19.00 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $17.60 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 143 MILES CITY, MT $18.06 

Ta~les 137 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 144 MISSOULA, MT $16.64 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $15.31 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $16.98 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $15.48 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $16.01 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $12.72 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $13.59 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 155 CLOVIS, NM $14.08 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 156 SOCORRO NM $11.98 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 157 SANTE FE, NM $21.20 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $13.80 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 185 ENID, OK $12.64 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 186 TULSA, OK $12.32 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $13.25 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 1A8 MCALESTER, OK $15.20 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 189 LAwTON, OK $13.70 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 191 PENDLETON, OR $18.15 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $15.18 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 206 PIERRE, so $14.84 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $13.50 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 211 AMARILLO, TX $14.84 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 212 AUSTIN, TX $17.89 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 215 DALLAS, TX $15.56 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 216 HOUSTON, TX $18.83 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $19.04 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $14.86 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $7.40 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $8.25 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 241 CASPER, WY $9.12 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $9.88 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $9.05 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 12 LORDSBURG, NM $18.02 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $16.54 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $18.02 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 15 PHOENIX, AZ $15.98 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $19.08 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 34 LA JUNTA, co $8.88 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $6.59 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 36 DENVER, co $2.76 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 37 GREELEY, co $7.08 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 38 PUEBLO, co $6.36 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 39 ALAMOSA, co $9.84 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $3.60 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 61 POCATELLO, ID $13.23 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $14.90 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 64 BOISE, ID $16.60 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 70 ST. LOUIS, MD $20.35 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 85 OMAHA, NE $14.84 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $14.63 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $15.98 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $8.97 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 95 SALINA, KS $12.59 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 96 TOPEKA, KS $14.29 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 97 OAKLEY, KS $9.99 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 98 WICHITA, KS $13.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 99 PITTSBURG, KS $15.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 100 DODGE CITY, KS $11.77 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 140 BILLINGS, MT $18.74 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $18.04 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 142 HELENA, MT $17.83 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 143 MILES CITY, MT $18.51 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 144 MISSOULA, MT $13.23 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 145 LINCOLN, NE $12.04 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $16.45 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $14.95 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 148 RENO, NV $31.48 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $16.96 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 153 EL PASO, TX $11.34 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $8.69 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 155 CLOVIS, NM $14.63 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 156 SOCORRO NM $12.72 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 157 SANTE FE, NM $29.68 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 172 BISMARK, NO $18.74 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $16.75 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 185 ENID, OK $14.84 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 186 TULSA, OK $16.54 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 187 BOISE CITY, OK $10.60" 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 188 MCALESTER, OK $18.66 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 189 LAWTON, OK $16.54 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 191 PENDLETON, OR $18.59 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 205 RAPID CITY, so $12.30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 206 PIERRE, so $14.63 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 219 MORGAN, UT $10.60 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $10.60 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $12.64 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 36 DENVER, co $9.03 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 37 GREELEY, co $7.21 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $10.60 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 61 POCATELLO, ID $5.53 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 63 TWIN FALLS, 10 $8.06 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $26.69 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $11.72 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $10.60 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $13.44 

138 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $10.35 94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 156 SOCORRO NM $13.33 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 186 TULSA, OK $13.67 94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $9.90 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 206 PIERRE, SD $9.99 94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 211 AMARILLO, ns $9.88 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $5.34 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $6.19 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $6.36 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $2. 12 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 17 FT. SMITH, AR $18.74 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 36 DENVER, CO $14.54 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 37 GREELEY, CD $17.38 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 38 PUEBLO, CO $18.02 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 61 POCATELLO, 10 $15.86 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 62 SPOKANE, WA $15.22 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $17.53 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL $15.35 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL $24.74 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, lA $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 85 OMAHA, NE $16.56 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $14.84 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 87 SIOUX FALLS, SD $16.26 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 89 MASON CITY, IA $18.89 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 90 SPENt::ER, lA $17.62 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $15.14 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $17.41 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 123 DETROIT, MI $20.97 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 124 TOLEDO, OH $27.94 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 126 MARQUETTE, MI $17.00 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $18.59 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI $15.26 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 129 DULUTH, MN $10.79 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 130 FARGO, NO $11.24 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $19.02 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $15.90 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 133 WILLMAR, MN $16.45 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $8.73 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 140 BILLINGS, MT $6.68 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $6.78 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 142 HELENA, MT $7.93 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT $9. 12 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 145 LINCOLN, NE $19.02 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 148 RENO, NV $32.67 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 153 EL PASO, TX $15.88 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 156 SOCORRO NM $18.85 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 172 BISMARK, NO $12.08 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $18.15 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 185 ENID, OK $17.11 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 186 TULSA, OK $16.28 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 187 BOISE CITY, OK $15.41 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 188 MCALESTER, OK $18.66 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 191 PENDLETON, OR $17.68 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 205 RAPID CITY, so $15.77 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 206 PIERRE, SD $11.13 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 211 AMARILLO, TX $15.39 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 219 MORGAN, UT $14.10 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $14.25 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 227 WENATCHEE, WA $17.70 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 230 YAKIMA, WA $18.30 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $21.20 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 241 CASPER, WY $9. 12 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 242 CHEYENNE, WY $16.64 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $17.38 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 17 FT. SMITH, A~ $15.18 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 1R MEMPHIS, TN $26.56 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 19 MONROE, LA $19.95 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 20 JONESBORO, AIZ $17.21 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $15.98 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $18.66 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $16.92 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $18.32 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 36 DENVER, co $10.79 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 37 GREELEY, CO $14.06 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 38 PUEBLO, CO $7.99 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $17.87 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $17.11 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 61 POCATELLO, ID $18.30 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 62 SPOKANE, WA $17.85 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 65 PEORIA, IL $14.48 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 66 DANVILLE, IL $25.10 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $24.36 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 68 DUBUQUE, lA $20.61 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 69 DAVENPORT, lA $21.05 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 10 ST. LOUIS, MO $23.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 71 LASALLE, IL $23.51 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 72 PADUCAH, KY $26.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $23.26 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 74 MARION, IL $25.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $23.43 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $22. 18 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $25.65 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $26.33 

Table-s 139 
Table F5. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $26.4:2 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 85 OMAHA, NE $14.61 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $8.35 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $16.71 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 88 WATERLOO, lA $19.29 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 89 MASON CITY, lA $18.72 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 90 SPENCER, lA $17.28 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 91 OTTUMWA, lA $19.84 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 92 DES MOINES, lA $11.94 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 93 CRESTON, lA $18.21 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $12.53 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 95 SALINA, KS $17.57 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 96 TOPEKA, KS $17.94 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 97 OAKLEY, KS $17.91 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 98 WICHITA, KS $18.68 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 99 PITTSBURG, KS $20.08 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 100 DODGE CITY, KS $19.80 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $24.34 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $17.96 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 123 DETROIT, MI $21.41 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 124 TOLEDO, OH $27.56 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 126 MARQUETTE, MI $19.65 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $20.56 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI $14.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 129 DULUTH, MN $13.53 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 130 FARGO, NO $18.72 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $20.92 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $20.35 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 133 WILLMAR, MN $18.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD $24.34 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD $21.26 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $11.17 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 140 BILLINGS, MT $14.54 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $14.54 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 142 HELENA, MT $12.91 

96 POWDER RIVER 6ASIN, WY 143 MILES CITY, MT $16.22 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 144 MISSOULA, MT $16.18 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $14.82 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $24.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 148 RENO, NV $33.60 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $12.13 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $16.73 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 155 CLOVIS, NM $17.21 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 156 SOCORRO NM $15. 12 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 157 SANTE FE, NM $25.02 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 172 BISMARK, NO $17.09 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 174 CLEVELAND, OH $29.04 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $22.24 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $13.95 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 185 ENID, OK $12.89 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 186 TIJLSA, OK $13.59 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $11.66 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 188 MCALESTER, OK $15.09 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 189 LAWTON, OK $14.95 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $11.58 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 206 PIERRE, so $14.01 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $15.98 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 211 AMARILLO, TX $11.66 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 212 AUSTIN, TX $19.53 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 213 LAREDO, TX $22.87 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 214 CORPUS CHRIST I , TX $22.49 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 215 DALLAS, TX $17.21 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 216 HOUSTON, TX $20.48 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $20.67 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $18.00 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $16.30 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $16.68 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $21.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 241 CASPER, WY $12.55 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $13.82 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $17.96 

97 FORT UNION, MT 38 PUEBLO, co $15.37 

97 FORT UNION, MT 65 PEORIA, IL $15.37 

97 FORT UNION, MT 85 OMAHA. NE $14.20 

97 FORT UNION, MT 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $7.40 

97 FORT UNION, MT 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $13.91 

97 FORT UNION, MT 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $12.78 

97 FORT UNION, MT 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $16.11 

97 FORT UNION, MT 126 MARQUETTE, MI $13.00 

97 FORT UNION, MT 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $14.59 

97 FORT UNION, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI $12.00 

97 FORT UNION, MT 129 DULUTH, MN $11.02 

97 FORT UNION, MT 130 FARGO, NO $10.85 

97 FORT UNION, MT 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $11.15 

97 FORT UNION, MT 133 WILLMAR, MN $13.04 

97 FORT UNION, MT 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $9.07 

97 FORT UNION, MT 140 BILLINGS, MT $11.24 

97 FORT UNION, MT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $12.19 

97 FORT UNION, MT 142 HELENA, MT $6.97 

97 FORT UNION, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT $13.91 

97 FORT UNION, MT 148 RENO, NV $29.09 

97 FORT UNION, MT 172 BISMARK, NO $8.90 

97 FORT UNION, MT 186 TULSA, OK $18.02 

140 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table FS. Transport rates for coal shipments by unit train-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

97 FORT UNION, MT 206 PIERRE, so $10.60 97 FORT UNION, MT 219 MORGAN, UT $14.44 97 FORT UNION, MT 220 SALT LAKE C lTV, UT $14.59 97 FORT UNION, MT 241 CASPER, WV $13.80 98 FORT UNION, NO 20 JONESBORO, AR $14.48 

98 FORT UNION, NO 21 CLARKSVILLE, A~ $13.84 98 FORT UNION, NO 36 DENVER, CO $14.46 98 FORT UNION, NO 38 PUEBLO, co $11.66 98 FORT UNION, NO 65 PEORIA, IL $12.93 98 FORT UNION, NO 85 OMAHA, NE $10.96 98 FORT UNION, NO 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $10.39 98 FORT UNION, NO 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $10.66 98 FORT UNION, NO 88 WATERLOO, lA $14.29 98 FORT UNION, NO 89 MASON CITY, lA $13.29 98 FORT UNION, NO 90 SPENCER, lA $12.02 98 FORT UNION, NO 92 DES MOINES, IA $13.99 98 FORT UNION, NO 93 CRESTON, IA $14.52 98 FORT UNION, NO 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $9.54 98 FORT UNION, NO 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $11.38 98 FORT UNION, NO 126 MARQUETTE, MI $10.56 98 FORT UNION, NO 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $12.15 98 FORT UNION, NO 128 LA CROSSE, WI $14.67 98 FORT UNION, NO 129 DULUTH, MN $10.60 98 FORT UNION, NO 130 FARGO, NO $8.42 98 FORT UNION, NO 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $12.97 98 FORT UNION, NO 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $10.07 98 FORT UNION, NO 133 WILLMAR, MN $10.56 98 FORT UNION, NO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $11.77 98 FORT UNION, NO 140 BILLINGS, MT $14.80 98 FORT UNION, NO 142 HELENA, Mi $9.65 98 FORT UNION, NO 144 MISSOULA, MT $13.65 98 FORT UNION, NO 145 LINCOLN, NE $14.44 98 FORT UNION, NO 148 RENO, NV $26.58 98 FORT UNION, NO 172 BISMARK,- NO $5.66 98 FORT UNION, NO 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $12.64 98 FORT UNION, NO 185 ENID, OK $11.60 98 FORT UNION, NO 186 TULSA, OK $10.68 98 FORT UNION, NO 187 BOISE CITY, OK $14.06 98 FORT UNION, NO 188 MCALESTER, OK $13.06 98 FORT UNION, NO 189 LAWTON, OK $13.63 98 FORT UNION, NO 205 RAPID CITY, so $12.11 98 FORT UNION, NO 206 PIERRE, so $9.54 98 FORT UNION, NO 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $14.69 99 DENVER BASIN, co 36 DENVER, CO $0.89 99 DENVER BASIN, co 37 GREELEY, CO $3.73 99 DENVER BASIN, co 38 PUEBLO, CO $3.54 99 DENVER BASIN, co 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $8.48 99 DENVER BASIN, co 148 RENO, NV $28.62 99 DENVER BASIN, co 153 EL PASO, TX $7.42 99 DENVER BASIN, co 187 BOISE CITY, OK $7.42 99 DENVER BASIN, co 206 PIERRE, so $8.48 99 DENVER BASIN, co 211 AMARILLO, TX $7.42 

Tabl:-s 141 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGIOH ( 1985 $/TON) 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 1 JACKSON, AL $11.58 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 2 COLUMBUS, GA $10.66 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 3 GADSDEN, AL $10.09 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $7.70 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5 MOBILE, AL $14.23 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 6 DOTHAN, AL $9.92 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7 DECATUR, AL $9.73 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $41.40 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 51 FT. MEYER, FL $40.96 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 55 CHATTANOOGA , TN $11.36 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 56 ATLANTA, GA $8.48 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 57 ATHENS, GA $11.85 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KV $12.27 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 135 TUPELO, IllS $10.15 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 202 SPAfHANBU~. sc $12.13 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 208 NASHVILLE, TN $11.91 

4 JASPER, TN 2 COLUMBUS, GA $12.70 

4 JASPER, TN 3 GADSDEN, At. $10.24 

4 JASPER, TN 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $10.22 

4 JASPER, TN 6 DOTHAN, AL $12.61 

4 JASPER, TN 7 DECATUR, AL $8.27 

4 JASPER, TN 50 W. PALM BEACH, FL $27.01 

4 JASPER, TN 51 FT. MEYER, fL $26.25 

4 JASPER, TN 54 MACON, GA $12.70 

4 JASPER, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA , TN $8.93 

4 JASPER, TN 56 ATLANTA, GA $12.70 

4 JASPER, TN 57 ATHENS, GA $12.70 

4 JASPER, TN 59 ALBANY, GA $12.70 

4 JASPER, TN 135 TUPELO, MS $10.30 

4 JASPER, TN 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $13.02 

4 JASPER, TN 164 OLEAN, NY $12.44 

4 JASPER, TN 166 RALEIGH, NC $12.44 

4 JASPER, TN 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $11.77 

4 JASPER, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $9.22 

4 JASPER, TN 208 NASHVILLE, TN $8.16 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $1!1.88 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 5 MOBILE, AL $32.14 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 7 DECATUR, AL $11.58 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $37.25 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 51 FT. MEYER, FL $39.01 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 54 MACON, GA $11.89 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $9. 16 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 56 ATLANTA, GA $13.02 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 57 ATHENS, GA $11.87 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 58 SAVANNAH, GA $24.38 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $12.25 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 101 HAZARD, KY $11.70 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 102 LEXINGTON, KY $11.70 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 122 GRANO RAPIDS, MI $27.35 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 164 OLEAN, NY $11.62 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 166 RALEIGH, NC $11.60 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $31.27 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 170 WILMINGTON, NC $35.13 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $10.26 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 201 FLORENCE, sc $20.33 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 202 SPARTANBURG, SC $11.64 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 203 GREENWOOD, sc $12.89 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $18.04 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $12.91 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 208 NASHVILLE, TN $10.37 

8 LEBANON, VA 1 JACKSON, AL $18.47 

8 LEBANON, VA 2 COLUMBUS, GA $17.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 3 GADSDEN, AL $16.71 

8 LEBANON, VA 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $16.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 5 MOBILE, AL $18.25 

8 LEBANON, VA 6 DOTHAN, AL $17.57 

8 LEBANON, VA 7 DECATUR, AL $16.47 

8 LEBANON, VA 18 MEMPHIS, TN $18.47 

8 LEBANON, VA 20 JONESBORO, AK $19.59 

8 LEBANON, VA 41 NORWICH, CT $22.26 

8 LEBANON, VA 42 HARTFORD, CT $22.26 

8 LEBANON, VA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $22.26 

8 LEBANON, VA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $17.81 

8 LEBANON, VA 46 DOVER, PE $18.85 

8 LEBANON, VA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $17.02 

8 LEBANON, VA 48 ORLANDO, FL $19.19 

8 LEBANON, VA 49 JACKSONVIlLE, FL $17.91 

8 LEBANON, VA 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $19.57 

8 LEBANON, VA 51 FT. MEYER, FL $19.57 

8 LEBANON, VA 52 TAMPA, FL $19.21 

8 LEBANON, VA 53 AUGUSTA, GA $16.79 

8 LEBANON, VA 54 MACON, GA $16.79 

8 LEBANON, VA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $8.54 

8 LEBANON, VA 56 ATLANTA, GA $17.30 

8 LEBANON, VA 57 ATHENS, GA $17.30 

8 LEBANON, VA 58 SAVANNAH, GA $17.30 

8 LEBANON, VA 59 ALBANY, GA $17.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 65 PEORIA, IL $19.14 

8 LEBANON, VA 66 DANVILLE, IL $18.66 

8 LEBANON, VA 67 CHICAGO, IL $17.19 

8 LEBANON, VA 70 ST. LOUIS, 1110 $19.19 

8 LEBANON, VA 71 LASALLE, IL $19.44 

8 LEBANON, VA 72 PADUCAH, ICY s 17.38 

142 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

8 LEBANON, VA 74 MARION, IL $19.55 

8 LEBANON, VA 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $19.55 

8 LEBANON, VA 76 MUNCIE, IN $17.36 

8 LEBANON, VA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $17.32 

8 LEBANON, VA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $16.43 

8 LEBANON, VA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $17.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $16.98 

8 LEBANON, VA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $18.23 

8 LEBANON, VA 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $19.08 

8 LEBANON, VA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $17.30 

8 LEBANON, VA 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $18.19 

8 LEBANON, VA 101 HAZARD, KY $16.96 

8 LEBANON, VA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $13.99 

8 LEBANON, VA 103 HUNTINGTON, WV $12.93 

8 LEBANON, VA 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $17.83 

8 LEBANON, VA 105 BOWLING G~EEN, KY $16.96 

8 LEBANON, VA 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $19.59 

8 LEBANON, VA 107 LEWISTON, ME $24.91 

8 LEBANON, VA 112 FREDERICK, MD $17.49 

8 LEBANON, VA 113 HAGERSTQ,WN, MD $18.23 

8 LEBANON, VA 114 SALISBURY, MD $17.49 

8 LEBANON, VA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $17.49 

8 LEBANON, VA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $17.36 

8 LEBANON, VA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $20.10 

8 LEBANON, VA 123 DETROIT, Ml $18.27 

8 LEBANON, VA 124 TOLEDO, OH $17.45 

8 LEBANON, VA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $19.29 

8 LEBANON, VA 134 GREENVILLE, MS $18.53 

8 LEBANON, VA 135 TUPELO, MS $16.77 

8 LEBANON, VA 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $18.72 

8 LEBANON, VA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $18.23 

8 LEBANON, VA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $19.19 

8 LEBANON, VA 164 OLEAN, NY $8.59 

8 LEBANON, VA 165 HICKORY, NC $15.31 

8 LEBANON, VA 166 RALEIGH, NC $8.88 8 LEBANON, VA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $17.21 8 LEBANON, VA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $12.51 8 LEBANON, VA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $16.54 8 LEBANON, VA 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $7.06 8 LEBANON, VA 173 DAYTON, OH $17.36 8 LEBANON, VA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $17.98 8 LEBANON, VA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $18.34 8 LEBANON, VA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $16.54 8 LEBANON, VA 177 LIMA, OH $17.34 8 LEBANON, VA 178 DUBOIS, PA $19.59 8 LEBANON, VA 179 PARKERSBURG, 'WV $16.62 

8 LEBANON, VA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $17.49 8 LEBANON, VA 181 WHEELING, wv $18.34 8 LEBANON, VA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $16.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $16.66 8 LEBANON, VA 195 ALTOONA, PA $19.36 8 LEBANON, VA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $19.21 8 LEBANON, VA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $17.94 8 LEBANON, VA 198 SUMTER, sc $17.83 8 LEBANON, VA 199 CHARLESTON, sc $16.64 8 LEBANON, VA 200 COLUMBIA, sc $16.64 8 LEBANON, VA 201 FLORENCE, sc $16.64 8 LEBANON, VA 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $9.09 8 LEBANON, VA 203 GREENWOOD, sc $12.30 8 LEBANON, VA 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $16.64 8 LEBANON, VA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $5.26 8 LEBANON, VA 208 NASHVILLE, TN $16.75 8 LEBANON, VA 209 JACKSON, TN $19.59 

8 LEBANON, VA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $8.52 8 LEBANON, VA 223 NORFOLK, VA $13.55 8 LEBANON, VA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $17.13 8 LEBANON, VA 225 RICHMOND, VA $17.60 8 LEBANON, VA 226 ROANOKE, VA $8.93 8 LEBANON, VA 231 ELKINS, WV $18.72 

8 LEBANON, VA 232 GASSAWAY, WV $6.30 8 LEBANON, VA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $17.83 

8 LEBANON, VA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $12.72 8 LEBANON, VA 235 CLARKSBURG, WV $17.51 

8 LEBANON, VA 236 BECKLEY, WV $10.18 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 1 JACKSON, AL $18.80 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 2 COLUMBUS, GA $18.02 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $16.01 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $19.59 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $17.77 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 6 DOTHAN, AL $17.91 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $16.71 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $19.95 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 17 FT. SMITH, AR $20.84 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN $17.62 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 19 MONROE, LA $19.95 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 20 JONESBORO, AR $18.76 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $19.95 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $20.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 41 NORWICH, CT $21.71 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 42 HARTFORD, CT $21.71 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 43 NEW YORK, NY $19.61 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 44 TORRINGTON, CT $21.71 

Tablc-s 143 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $17.60 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 46 DOVER, DE $19.06 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 47 WASHINGTON, DC $16.43 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 48 ORLANDO, FL $19.53 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 49 JACKSONVILLE, FL $19.06 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $19.91 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 51 FT. MEYER, FL $19.91 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $19.55 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA $16.47 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 54 MACON, GA $17.53 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $16.56 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $16. 13 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 57 ATHENS, GA $17.36 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 58 SAVANNAH, GA $17.43 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 59 ALBANY, GA $17.55 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL $17.70 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 66 DANVILLE, IL $17.24 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 67 CHICAGO, IL $11.38 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 68 DUBUQUE, IA $18.91 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 69 DAVENPORT, lA $18.91 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $17.04 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 71 LASALLE, IL $17.96 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $15.62 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $18.85 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 74 MARION, IL $18.10 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $17.81 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 76 MUNCIE, IN $15.54 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $15.98 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $14.84 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $11.87 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $9.18 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $15.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $16.68 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $15.39 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $15.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 88 WATERLOO, IA $19.78 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 89 MASON CITY, IA $19.80 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 90 SPENCER, IA $20.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 91 OTTUMWA, IA $19.78 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 92 DES MOINES, IA $19.80 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 93 CRESTON, lA $19.80 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $20.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 96 TOPEKA, KS $19.61 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 99 PITTSBURG, KS $19.95 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $8.82 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $11.02 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $5.85 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $14.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $16.56 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $19.95 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 107 LEWISTON, ME $24.38 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 112 FREDERICK, MD $17.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $15.90 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 114 SALISBURY, MD $17.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 115 BALTIMORE, MD $17.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $16.81 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $20.31 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 119 BOSTON, MA $22.03 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $23.38 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $16.41 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 123 DETROIT, MI $14.54 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $10.71 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $15.88 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 126 MARQUETTE, MI $19.55 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 127 ST CLOUD, MN $20.52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $20.44 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 134 GREENVILLE, MS $18.89 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 135 TUPELO, MS $17.11 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 136 GREENSBORO, NC $17.81 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $17.77 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $19.95 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $18.59 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $18.63 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 159 BURLINGTON, VT $18.91 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 161 ALBANY, NY $18.76 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 162 BUFFALO, NY $18.80 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $18.91 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 164 OLEAN, NY $15.96 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 165 HICKORY, NC $16.32 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC $13.40 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $16.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $16.88 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $16.60 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 170 WILMINGTON, NC $17.51 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $15.98 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $12.08 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 174 CLEVELAND, OH $11.51 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 175 MANSFIELD, OH $15.90 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $10.60 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 177 LIMA, OH $14.63 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 17~ DUBOIS, PA $16.05 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $14.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 180 SANDUSKY, OH $11.74 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv $16.03 

144 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $7.50 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $11.87 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 188 MCALESTER, OK $20.84 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 195 ALTOONA, PA $17.36 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 196 HARRISBURG, PA $17.62 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $14.39 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 198 SUMTER, sc $18.17 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc $17.85 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc $16.94 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 201 FLORENCE, sc $16.64 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $15.79 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 203 GREENWOOD, sc $17.26 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $16.88 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $12.21 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $15.71 9 PIKEVILLE, KY 209 JACKSON, TN $18.74 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $15.73 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 223 NORFOLK, VA $18.44 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $16.45 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 225 RICHMOND, VA $16.98 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 226 ROANOKE, VA $14.52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 231 ELKINS, WV $9.12 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 23"2 GASSAWAY, wv $11.98 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $17.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9.14 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $14.63 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 236 BECKLEY, wv $10.22 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $20.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 238 WAUSAU, WI $20.84 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $19.89 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 240 MADISON, WI $19.95 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 1 JACKSON, AL $16.98 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 3 GADSDEN, AL $14.80 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $15.71 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $9.20 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 47 WASHINGTON, DC $19.04 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $20.35 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 51 FT. MEYER, FL $18.61 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $17.96 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA $16.49 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 54 MACON, GA $16.51 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $8.48 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $7.53 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 57 ATHENS, GA $8.48 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 58 SAVANNAH, GA $16.96 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 59 ALBANY, GA $17.24 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $18.91 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $9.60 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $8.73 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.52 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $16.32 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $7.04 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.27 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $18.97 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $17.74 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $18.85 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 162 BUFFALO, NY $19.46 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 164 OLEAN, NY $8.99 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 165 HICKORY, NC $16.54 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC $9.05 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $17.07 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $7.10 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc $16.37 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc $16.45 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 201 FLORENCE, sc $16.11 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $9.09 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 203 GREENWOOD, sc $6.64 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $16.11 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $8.29 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $8.65 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 223 NORFOLK, VA $16.32 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 225 RICHMOND, VA $17.96 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $19.08 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $8.40 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $9.09 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $9.22 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $7.76 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5.55 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $9.22 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $9.24 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $8.84 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.90 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $8.99 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $5.24 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.88 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $6.74 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH $9.14 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $9.03 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 177 LIMA, OH $9.16 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $8.90 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8.80 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $8.42 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $8.65 

Table~ 145 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

11 BEATTYVIllE, KY 208 NASHVIllE, TN $9.24 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 232 GASSAWAY, wv $6.74 

11 BEATTYVIllE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9.16 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 236 BECKLEY, wv $6.74 

12 SAlYERSVIllE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $17.83 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $16.07 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $8.82 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $12.72 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $9.22 

12 SAlYERSVIlLE, KY 78 lOUISVILLE, KY $7.70 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5.45 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $8.84 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.88 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $8.65 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $11.02 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.86 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 107 LEWISTON, ME $25.38 

12 SALYERSVIlLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $17.79 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH $16. 13 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $6.74 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC $16.28 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 176 COLUMBUS, OH $9.01 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, WV $8.90 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv $17.04 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8.78 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $8.42 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $15.73 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $8.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $10.60 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 232 GASSAWAY, wv $6.74 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9.05 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 236 BECKLEY, wv $6.74 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $20.08 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 5 MOBILE, AL $20.10 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 76 MUNCIE, IN $16.54 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 79 CINCINNATI. OH $6.08 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 101 HAZARD, KY $8.59 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.63 

13 PlEASANTVIlLE, OH 103 HUNTINGTON, WV $7. 14 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 107 LEWISTON, ME $24.97 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $5.72 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 123 DETROIT, MI $9.31 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 124 TOLEDO, OH $8.73 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 173 DAYTON, OH $9.29 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH $8.84 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 175 MANSFIELD, OH $8.71 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.76 

13 PLEASANTVIlLE, 01-! 177 LIMA, OH $9.35 

13 PLEASANTVIlLE, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $8.65 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 180 SANDUSKY, OH $8.40 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 181 WHEELING, wv $16.64 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8.52 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $8.16 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 208 NASHVILLE, TN $18.25 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 232 GASSAWAY, wv $4.96 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $6.89 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 234 CHARLESTON, wv $7.38 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 236 BECKLEY, wv $4.96 

14 CADIZ, OH 76 MUNCIE, IN $17.17 

14 CADIZ, OH 124 TOLEDO, OH $18.66 

14 CADIZ, OH 161 ALBANY, NY $8.90 

14 CADIZ, OH 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $8.63 

14 CADIZ, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH $7.87 

14 CADIZ, OH 175 MANSFIELD, OH $7.50 

14 CADIZ, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $16.09 

14 CADIZ, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA $7.19 

14 CADIZ, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $16.15 

14 CADIZ, OH 180 SANDUSKY, OH $7.53 

14 CADIZ, OH 181 WHEELING, wv $16.98 

14 CADIZ, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $16.43 

14 CADIZ, OH 195 ALTOONA, PA $7.29 

14 CADIZ, OH 196 HARRISBURG. PA $7.53 

14 CADIZ, OH 231 ELKINS, WV $3.75 

14 CADIZ, OH 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $7. 19 

14 CADIZ, OH 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $14.63 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 68 DUBUQUE, l.A $8.78 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 73 ROCKFORD, IL $8.82 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 76 MUNCIE, IN $8.95 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $9.01 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $9.03 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $9.12 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 101 HAZARD, KY $7.21 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $8.82 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $6.64 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $21.03 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 164 OLEAN, NY $17.91 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 173 DAYTON, OH $6.19 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH $17.28 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.23 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA $19.42 

146 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $8.10 15 YOUNGSTOWN, DH 181 WHEELING, WV $17.53 15 YOUNGSTOWN, DH 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $7.99 15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $7.61 15 YOUNGSTOWN, DH 231 ELKINS, WV $3.58 15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 232 GASSAWAY, wv $6.64 15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 234 CHARLESTON, WV $9.05 15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $5.72 15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 236 BECKLEY, WV $6.64 15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 238 WAUSAU, WI $6.78 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 5 MOBILE, AL $21.54 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 7 DECATUR, AL $19.46 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $21.12 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $21.12 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $17.85 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $21.12 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $14.01 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 46 DOVER, DE $17.51 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $15.90 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $27.43 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 51 FT. MEYER, FL $22.32 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 59 ALBANY, GA $20.44 16 PITTSBURGH. PA 67 CHICAGO, IL $16.79 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 76 MUNCIE, IN $16.45 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $18.61 16 PITTSBURGH. PA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $17.87 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $18.30 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 80 I NO I ANAPOLI S, IN $17.74 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $17.17 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $17.72 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $17.94 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 101 HAZARD, KY $17.28 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $17.24 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $15.41 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $22.90 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $17.09 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $18.32 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 114 SALISBURY, MD $·16.18 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $1(). 13 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $17.11 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 119 BOSTON, MA $20.59 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $22.01 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH $21.01 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $20.88 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $15.75 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $26.29 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $17.04 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 129 DULUTH, MN $21.69 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $17.98 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $18.06 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $13.78 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $18.68 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $17.30 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $18.30 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $14.84 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $11. 17 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $13.78 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $16.54 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 165 HICKORY, NC $18.04 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $17.87 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $18.04 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $16.85 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $13.14 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $16.96 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $16.28 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 177 LIMA, OH $15.09 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $13.14 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $15.14 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $7.70 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $16.96 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $16.41 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $16.62 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $11.77 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $15.37 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $7.57 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $18.04 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 208 NASHVILLE, TN $19.00 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $17.00 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $17 11 

16 PITTSBURGH , PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $17.00 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $16.96 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $17.57 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $16.96 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $16.22 

Tables 147 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, WV $14.20 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 236 BECKLEY. wv $17.57 

17 KITTANNING, PA 2 COLUMBUS, GA $19.33 

17 KITTANNING, PA 3 GADSDEN, AL $19.16 

17 KITTANNING, PA 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $19.14 

17 KITTANNING, PA 7 DECATUR, AL $18.74 

17 KITTANNING, PA 18 MEMPHIS, TN $19.53 

17 KITTANNING, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $20.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $20.48 

17 KITTANNING, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $17.89 

17 KITTANNING, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $20.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $15.82 

17 KITTANNING, PA 46 DOVER, DE $16.54 

17 KITTANNING, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $15.60 

17 KITTANNING, PA 53 AUGUSTA, GA $19.69 

17 KITTANNING, PA 54 MACON, GA $19.21 

17 KITTANNING, PA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $18.27 

17 KITTANNING, PA 56 ATLANTA, GA $19.23 

17 KITTANNING, PA 57 ATHENS, GA $19.23 

17 KITTANNING, PA 58 SAVANNAH, GA $19.69 

17 KITTANNING, PA 65 PEORIA, IL $19.04 

17 KITTANNING, PA 66 DANVILLE, IL $18.55 

17 KITTANNING, PA 67 CHICAGO, IL $17.68 

17 KITTANNING, PA 68 DUBUQUE, lA $20.22 

17 KITTANNING, PA 69 DAVENPORT, lA $20.22 

17 KITTANNING, PA 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $19.36 

17 KITTANNING, PA 71 LASALLE, IL $19.31 

17 KITTANNING, PA 72 PADUCAH, KY $18.38 

17 KITTANNING, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL $19.31 

17 KITTANNING, PA 74 MARION, IL $19.72 

17 KITTANNING, PA 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $19.44 

17 KITTANNING, PA 76 MUNCIE, IN $16.64 

17 KITTANNING, PA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $17.87 

17 KITTANN.ING, PA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $17.13 

17 KITTANNING, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $17.55 

17 KITTANNING, PA 80 I NO IANAPOLI S, IN $17.00 

17 KITTANNING, PA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $16.43 

17 KITTANNING, PA 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $17.47 

17 KITTANNING, PA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $17.00 

17 KITTANNING, PA 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $17.19 

17 KITTANNING, PA 101 HAZARD, KY $16.54 

17 KITTANNING, PA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $16.51 

17 KITTANNING, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $15.60 

17 KITTANNING, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $22.15 

17 KITTANNING, PA 108 HOULTON, ME $23.64 

17 KITTANNING, PA 109 BANGOR, ME $23.64 

17 KITTANNING, PA 110 PORTLAND, ME $22.15 

17 KITTANNING, PA 111 GREENVILLE, ME $23.64 

17 KITTANNING, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $16.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN. MD $7.02 

17 KITTANNING, PA 114 SALISBURY, MO $16.22 

17 KITTANNING, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $16.26 

17 KITTANNING, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $14.90 

17 KITTANNING, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $18.42 

17 KITTANNING, PA 118 WORCESTER, MA $19.84 

17 KITTANNING, PA 119 BOSTON, MA $19.84 

17 KITTANNING, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH $20.27 

17 KITTANNING, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $17.32 

17 KITTANNING, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $16.62 

17 KITTANNING, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $15.86 

17 KITTANNING, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $17.41 

17 KITTANNING, PA 126 MARQUETTE, MI $19.10 

17 KITTANNING, PA 129 DULUTH, MN $20.95 

17 KITTANNING, PA 134 GREENVILLE, MS $20.20 

17 KITTANNING, PA 135 TUPELO, MS $19.23 

17 KITTANNING, PA 149 PLYMOUTH. NH $17.24 

17 KITTANNING, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $17.34 

17 KITTANNING, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $23.32 

17 KITTANNING, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $18.13 

17 KITTANNING, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $17.55 

17 KITTANNING, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $17.96 

17 KITTANNING, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $9.16 

17 KITTANNING, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $22.01 

17 KITTANNING, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $8.84 

17 KITTANNING, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $19.82 

17 KITTANNING, PA 165 HICKORY, NC $17.30 

17 KITTANNING, PA 166 RALEIGH, NC $17.60 

17 KITTANNING, PA 197 CHARLOTTE. NC $18.02 

17 KITTANNING, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $17.13 

17 KITTANNING, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $17.32 

17 KITTANNING, PA 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $18.80 

17 KITTANNING, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $16.11 

17 KITTANNING, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $7.59 

17 K ITT ANN I NG, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $7.84 

148 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

17 KITTANNING, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $15.54 

17 KITTANNING, PA 177 LIMA, OH $15.48 

17 KITTANNING, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $3.90 

17 KITTANNING, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $15.75 

17 KITTANNING, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $6.53 

17 KITTANNING, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $6.85 

17 KITTANNING, PA 182 Cl'fl L LI CO THE , OH $15.69 

17 KITTANNING, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $15.90 

17 KITTANNING, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $2.44 

17 KITTANNING, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $3.99 

17 KITTANNING, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $8.18 

17 KITTANNING, PA 198 SUMTER, sc $19.99 

17 KITTANNING, PA 199 CHARLESTON, sc $19.00 

17 KITTANNING, PA 200 COLUMBIA, sc $18.83 

17 KITTANNING, PA 201 FLORENCE, sc $18.97 

17 K ITT ANN I NG, PA 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $17.32 

17 KITTANNING, PA 203 GREENWOOD, sc $19.82 

17 KITTANNING, PA 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $19.00 

17 KITTANNING, PA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $17.77 

17 KITTANNING, PA 208 NASHVILLE, TN $18.25 

17 KITTANNING, PA 209 JACKSON, TN $20.65 

17 KITTANNING, PA 221 MONTPELIER, VT $20.37 

17 KITTANNING, !'A 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $16.26 

17 KITTANNING, PA 223 NORFOLK, VA $18.04 

17 KITTANNING, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $16.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 225 RICHMOND, VA $17.49 

17 KITTANNING, PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $16.26 

17 KITTANNING, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $3.10 

17 KITTANNING, PA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $16.83 

17 KITTANNING, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $6.53 

17 KITTANNING, PA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $15.48 

17 KITTANNING, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $6.19 

17 KITTANNING, PA 236 BECKLEY, wv $16.94 

17 KITTANNING, PA 237 GREEN BAY, WI $20.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $19.63 

17 KITTANNING, PA 240 MADISON, WI $20.37 

18 SHARON, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $20.29 

18 SHARON, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $20.29 

18 SHARON, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $20.29 

18 SHARON, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $18.15 

18 SHARON, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $10.09 

18 SHARON, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL $19.42 

18 SHARON, PA 76 MUNCIE, IN $16.47 

18 SHARON, PA 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $16.43 

18 SHARON, PA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $15.58 

18 SHARON, PA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $16.41 

18 SHARON, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $15.71 

18 SHARON, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $8.01 

18 SHARON, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $15.39 

18 SHARON, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $19.06 

18 SHARON, PA 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $21.14 

18 SHARON, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH $20.16 

18 SHARON, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $15.82 

18 SHARON, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $9.79 

18 SHARON, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $18.25 

18 SHARON, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $19.12 

18 SHARON, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $20.48 

18 SHARON, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $15.71 

18 SHARON, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $17.66 

18 SHARON, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $15.86 

18 SHARON, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $22.15 

18 SHARON, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $13.14 

18 SHARON, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $8.48 

18 SHARON, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $9.75 

18 SHARON, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $16.96 

18 SHARON, PA 177 LIMA, OH $15.58 

18 SHARON, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $10.60 

18 SHARON, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $11.66 

18 SHARON, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $9.54 

18 SHARON, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $10.60 

18 SHARON, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $12.93 

18 SHARON, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $10.60 

18 SHARON, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $17.28 

18 SHARON, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $7.74 

18 SHARON, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $8.18 

18 SHARON, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $5.62 

18 SHARON, PA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $15.58 

18 SHARON, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $9.75 

18 SHARON, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $19.00 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $19.12 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $19.12 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $17.09 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $19.12 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $15.29 

Tables 149 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG fl SUPPLY REGION REG fl DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 46 DOVER, DE $17.34 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 47 WASHINGTON, oc $16.81 

19 STATE COLLEGE. PA 53 AUGUSTA, GA $20.73 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $20.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE. PA 58 SAVANNAH, GA $20.73 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 66 DANVILLE, IL $20.84 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 67 CHICAGO, IL $20.44 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 71 LASALLE, IL $20.73 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL $20.71 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 76 MUNCIE, IN $19.55 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $20.39 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $19.86 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $19.50 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $19.55 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $19.48 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $19.48 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $20.39 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 102 LEXINGTON, KY $18.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE. PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $17.89 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $20.90 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 108 HOULTON, ME $21.79 

19 STATE COLLEGE. PA 109 BANGOR, ME $21.79 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 110 PORTLAND, ME $20.90 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 111 GREENVILLE, ME $21.79 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $16.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $16.96 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 114 SALISBURY, MD $16.03 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $16.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $16.96 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $16.66 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 118 WORCESTER, MA $18.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 119 BOSTON, MA $18.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $20.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH $19.04 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $19.63 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $17.96 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $18.74 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $18.83 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 126 MARQUETTE, MI $20.50 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $16.01 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $17.81 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $16.90 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $16.32 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $18.06 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $16.18 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $15.37 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $16.32 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $19.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 165 HICKORY, NC $18.72 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 166 RALEIGH, NC $19.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $18.72 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $18.74 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $18.72 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 170 WILMINGTON, NC $19.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $19.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $18.68 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $9.12 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $17.81 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $17.85 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 177 LIMA, OH $18.66 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $11.66 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $17.91 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $12.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 181 WHEELING, WV $12.08 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $17.98 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $18.19 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $16.47 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $16.28 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $16.96 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 199 CHARLESTON, sc $19.72 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 200 COLUMBIA, sc $20.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 201 FLORENCE, sc $19.69 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $19.61 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 203 GREENWOOD, sc $20.90 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $19.69 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $19.76 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 208 NASHVILLE, TN $20.37 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 221 MONTPELIER, VT $18.25 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $17.87 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 223 NORFOLK, VA $18.76 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $16:90 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 225 RICHMOND, VA $18.02 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $17.87 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 231 ELKINS, wv $11.87 

150 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Tahle F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $19.12 19 STATE COLlEGE, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $19.12 19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 234 CHARLESTON, wv $17.77 19 STATE COLlEGE, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $12.08 19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 236 BECKLEY, WV $19.12 19 STATE COU,.EGE, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $20.90 20 SOMERSET, PA 2 COLUMBUS, GA $19.44 20 SOMERSET, PA 3 GADSDEN, AL $19.27 20 SOMERSET, PA 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $19.25 20 SQMf:RSET, PA 7 DECATUR, AL $18.85 20 SOMERSET, PA 18 MEMPHIS, TN $19.63 20 S~ERSET, PA 41 NORWICH, CT $20.48 20 SOMERSET, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT $20.48 

20 SOMERSET, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY $17.74 

20 SOMERSET, PA 44 TORRINGTON, CT $20.48 20 SOMEII!SET, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $15.58 20 SOMERSET, PA 46 DOVER, DE $17.94 

20 SOMERSET, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC $15.16 20 SOMERSET, PA 49 JACKSONVILLE, FL $20.50 

20 SOMERSET, PA 53 AUGUSTA, GA $19.80 

20 SOMERSET, PA 54 MACON, GA $19.31 

20 SOMERSET, PA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $18.38 

20 SOMERSET, PA 56 ATLANTA, GA $19.33 

20 SOMERSET, PA 57 ATHENS, GA $19.33 

20 SOMERSET, PA 58 SAVANNAH, GA $19.80 

20 SOMERSET, PA 59 ALBANY, GA $19.80 

20 SOMERSET, PA 65 PEORIA, IL $19.14 

20 SOMERSET, PA 66 DANVILL:E-, IL $18.66 

20 SOMERSET, PA 67 CHICAGO, IL $19.12 

20 SOMERSET, PA 70 ST. LOUIS, MD $19.46 

20 SOMERSET, PA 71 LASALLE, IL $19.42 

20 SOMERSET, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL $19.42 

20 SOMERSET, PA 74 MARION, IL $19.82 

20 SOMERSET, PA 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $19.55 

20 SOMERSET, PA 76 MUNCIE, IN $16.75 

20 SOMERSET, PA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $17.98 

20 SOMERSET, PA 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $17.24 

20 SOMERSET, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH $17.68 

20 SOMERSET, PA 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $17.11 

20 SOMERSET, PA 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $16.54 

20 SOMERSET, PA 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $17.57 

20 SOMERSET, PA 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $17.11 

20 SOMERSET, PA 84 HRRA HAUTE, IN $17.32 20 SOMERSET, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $15.71 20 SOMERSET, PA 107 LEWISTON, ME $22.26 20 SOMERS£T, PA 108 HOULTON, ME $23.74 20 SOMERSET, PA 109 BANGOR, ME $23.74 20 SOMERSET, PA 110 PORTLAND, ME $22.26 20 SOMERSET, PA 111 GREENVILLE, ME $23.74 20 SOMERSET, PA 112 FREDERICK, MD $16.47 20 SOMERSET, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $11.02 20 SONERSfT, PA 114 SALISBURY, MD $16.43 20 SOMERSET, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD $16.37 20 SOMERSET, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $16.03 20 SOMERSET, PA 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $18.53 20 SOMERSET, PA 118 WORCESTER, MA $19.95 20 SOMERSET, PA 119 BOSTON, MA $19.95 20 SOMERSET, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH $20.31 20 SOMERSET, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $17.43 20 SOMERSET, PA 123 DETROIT, MI $16.49 20 SOMERSET, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH $15.69 20 SOMERSET, PA 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $17.51 20 SOMERSET, PA 126 MARQUETTE, MI $19.21 20 SOMERSET, PA 129 DULUTH, MN $21.05 20 SOMERSET, PA 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $20.80 20 SOMERSET, PA 135 TUPELO, MS $19.33 20 SOMERSET, PA 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $17.36 20 SOMERSET, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $17.45 20 SOMERSET, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA $14.84 20 SOMERSET, PA 158 SYRACUSE, NY $19.12 20 SOMERSET, PA 159 BURLINGTON, VT $17.66 20 SOMERSET, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY $19.95 20 SOMERSET, PA 161 ALBANY, NY $14.84 20 SOMERSET, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY $20.92 20 SOMERSET, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $14.84 20 SOMERSET, PA 164 OLEAN, NY $17.60 20 SOMERSET, PA 165 HICKORY, NC $17.43 20 SOMERSET, PA 166 RALEIGH, NC $17.70 20 SOMERSET, PA 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $18.13 20 SOMERSET, PA 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $17.24 20 SOMERSET, PA 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $17.43 

20 SOMERSET, PA 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $18.91 20 SOMERSET, PA 173 DAYTON, OH $16.24 20 SOMERSET, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH $14.84 

Tables 151 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

20 SOMERSET, PA 175 MANSFIELD, OH $14.84 

20 SOMERSET, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH $15.67 

20 SOMERSET, PA 177 LIMA, OH $15.58 

20 SOMERSET, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $11.45 

20 SOMERSET, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $15.73 

20 SOMERSET, PA 180 SANDUSKY, OH $12.72 

20 SOMERSET, PA 181 WHEELING, WV $13.57 

20 SOMERSET, PA 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $15.79 

20 SOMERSET, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $16.01 

20 SOMERSET, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $10.60 

20 SOMERSET, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA $14.84 

20 SOMERSET, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $8.90 

20 SOMERSET, PA 198 SUMTER, sc $20.10 

20 SOMERSET, PA 199 CHARLESTON, sc $19.10 

20 SOMERSET, PA 200 COLUMBIA, sc $18.91 

20 SOMERSET, PA 201 FLORENCE, sc $19.08 

20 SOMERSET, PA 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $17.41 

20 SOMERSET, PA 203 GREENWOOD, sc $19.93 

20 SOMERSET, PA 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $19.08 

20 SOMERSET, PA 207 KNOXVILLE. TN $17.87 

20 SOMERSET, PA 208 NASHVILLE, TN $18.36 

20 SOMERSET. PA 209 JACKSON, TN $20.75 

20 SOMERSET, PA 221 MONTPELIER, VT $20.48 

20 SOMERSET, PA 222 LYNCHBURG. VA $16.39 

20 SOMERSET, PA 223 NORFOLK, VA $18.15 

20 SOMERSET, PA 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $16.49 

20 SOMERSET, PA 225 RICHMOND, VA $17.60 

20 SOMERSET, PA 226 ROANOKE, VA $16.37 

20 SOMERSET, PA 231 ELKINS, WV $11.87 

20 SOMERSET, PA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $16.94 

20 SOMERSET, PA 233 MARTINSBURG. WV $10.60 

20 SOMERSET, PA 234 CHARLESTON, WV $15.58 

20 SOMERSET, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, WV $12.72 

20 SOMERSET, PA 236 BECKLEY, WV $16.94 

20 SOMERSET, PA 237 GREEN BAY, WI $20.48 

20 SOMERSET, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $19.74 

20 SOMERSET, PA 240 MADISON, WI $20.48 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 1 JACKSON, AL $18.23 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 2 COLUMBUS, GA $17.45 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 3 GADSDEN, AL $16.47 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $18.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 5 MOBILE, AL $18.02 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 6 DOTHAN, AL $17.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 7 DECATUR, AL $16.07 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $19.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 17 FT. SMITH, AR $20.27 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 18 .MEMPHIS, TN $17.04 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 19 MONROE, LA $19.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 20 JONESBORO, AR $18.17 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $19.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $20.27 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 41 NORWICH, CT $21.14 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT $21.14 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 43 NEW YORK, NV $19.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 44 TORRINGTON, CT $21.14 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 45 PHI LADEPHIA, PA $16.35 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 46 DOVER, DE $18.49 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 47 WASHINGTON, DC $15.58 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 48 ORLANDO, FL $18.95 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 49 JACKSONVILLE, FL $18.49 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 52 TAMPA, Fl $18.97 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 53 AUGUSTA, GA $16.56 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 54 MACON, GA $16.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $15.71 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 56 ATLANTA, GA $16.79 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 57 ATHENS, GA $16.79 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 58 SAVANNAH, GA $16.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 59 ALBANY, GA $16.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 65 PEORIA, IL $17.26 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 66 DANVILLE, IL $16.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 67 CHICAGO, IL $13.72 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 68 DUBUQUE, IA $18.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 69 DAVENPORT, IA $18.53 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $17.51 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 71 LASALLE, IL $17.43 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 72 PADUCAH, KV $15.92 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 73 ROCKFORD, IL $18.32 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 74 ·MARION, IL $17.53 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $17.24 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 76 MUNCIE, IN $15.05 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $15.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, KV $13.36 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH $10.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $9.37 

152 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $15.35 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $16.18 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $15.16 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $15.48 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $20.99 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 88 WATERLOO, lA $19.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 89 MASON CITY, IA $19.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 90 SPENCER, IA $20.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 91 OTTUMWA, lA $19.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 92 DES MOINES, IA $19.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 93 CRESTON, IA $19.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 94 KANSAS CITY. MD $20.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 101 HAZARD, KY $12.72 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 102 LEXINGTON, KY $9.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $7.65 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $12.72 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN. KY $15.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $19.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 110 PORTLAND, ME $23.79 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 112 FREDERICK, MD $17.13 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $15.35 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 114 SALISBURY, MD $17.13 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 115 BAL TlMORE, MD $17.13 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $16.24 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $19.72 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 119 BOSTON, MA $21.45 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $22.85 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 122 GRAND RAPIDS. MI $17.28 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 123 DETROIT, IIIII $15.98 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 124 TOLEDO, OH $15.73 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $16.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 126 MARQUETTE, MI $18.97 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $19.95 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 129 DULUTH, MN $20.84 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $20.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 133 WILLMAR, MN $20.18 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 134 GREENVILLE, MS $18.32 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 135 TUPELO, MS $16.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 136 GREENSBORO, NC $19.36 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD $17.19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD $19.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $18.02 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ $18.06 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA $23.91 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 158 SYRACUSE, NY $20.67 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 159 BURLINGTON, VT $18.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 160 ROCHESTER, NY $21.35 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 161 ALBANY, NY $18.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 162 BUFFALO, NY $18.57 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $18.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 164 OLEAN, NY $15.41 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 165 HICKORY, NC $16.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 166 RALEIGH, NC $17.81 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $17.04 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 168 ELIZABETH CITY, NC $16 30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $16 54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 170 WILMINGTON, NC $17.19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $16.62 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 173 DAYTON, OH $9.46 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 174 CLEVELAND, OH $12.02 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 175 MANSFIELD, OH $15.69 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.69 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 177 LIMA, OH $13.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 178 DUBOIS, PA $15.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $9.12 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 180 SANDUSKY, OH $14.16 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 181 WHEELING, wv $15.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8.90 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $8.48 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 195 ALTOONA, PA $17.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 196 HARRISBURG, PA $17.07 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $15.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 198 SUMTER, sc $17.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 199 CHARLESTON, sc $17.57 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 200 COLUMBIA, sc $16.41 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 201 FLORENCE, sc $16.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $15.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 203 GREENWOOD, sc $16.73 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $16.41 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $15.58 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 208 NASHVILLE, TN $15.77 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 209 JACKSON, TN $18.17 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $15.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA $15.37 

Tables 153 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $16.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA $16.58 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 226 ROANOKE, VA $15.12 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 231 ELKINS, wv $10.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 232 GASSAWAY, WV $8.69 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $16.71 

21 CHARLES TON, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv $6.49 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $20.88 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 236 BECKLEY, wv $8.69 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 237 GREEN BAY, WI $20.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 238 WAUSAU, WI $20.25 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $19.57 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 240 MADISON, WI $19.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 41 NORWICH, CT $20.82 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT $20.82 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 44 TORRINGTON, CT $20.82 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $16.75 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH $19.12 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $9.14 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 107 LEWISTON, ME $23.47 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $6.32 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA $10.18 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 161 ALBANY, NY $9.09 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 163 BINGHAMTON, NY $8.71 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 174 CLEVELAND, OH $7.53 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 175 MANSFIELD, OH $7 59 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 178 DUBOIS, PA $7.44 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $15.94 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 180 SANDUSKY, OH $7.21 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 181 WHEELING, wv $6.06 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 195 ALTOONA, PA $7.36 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 196 HARRISBURG, PA $7.65 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $6.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 231 ELKINS, wv $3.84 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 232 GASSAWAY, WV $6.87 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 233 MARTINSBURG, WV $5.41 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9.29 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $6.70 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 236 BECKLEY, wv $6.87 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 1 JACKSON, AL $20.42 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 2 COLUMBUS, GA $19.63 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 3 GADSDEN, AL $18.66 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $18.63 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 6 DOTHAN, AL $19.53 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 7 DECATUR, AL $18.42 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 18 MEMPHIS, TN $18.66 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 41 NORWICH, CT $20.67 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT $20.67 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 43 NEW YORK, NY $18.78 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 44 TORRINGTON, CT $20.67 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA $16.39 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 46 DOVER, DE $18.02 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 47 WASHINGTON, DC $16.83 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 49 JACKSONVILLE, FL $20.67 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 53 AUGUSTA, GA $19. 14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 54 MACON, GA $19.14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $17.72 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 56 ATLANTA, GA $19. 14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 57 ATHENS, GA $19.14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 58 SAVANNAH, GA $19.14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 59 ALBANY, GA $19.14 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 65 PEORIA, IL $18.44 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 66 DANVILLE, IL $17.94 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 67 CHICAGO, IL $18.44 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 71 LASALLE, IL $18.72 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 72 PADUCAH, KY. $17.57 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 73 ROCKFORD, IL $19.61 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 74 MARION, IL $19.72 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $18.85 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 76 MUNCIE, IN._. $16.66 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $17.49 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $16.60 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH $18.97 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $16.60 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $17.53 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $18.36 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $16.60 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $17.49 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 96 TOPEKA, KS $21.20 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 101 HAZARD, KY $t5.94 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 102 LEXINGTON, KY $15.92 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 103 HUNT! NGTON, wv $11.77 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $18.02 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $17.68 

154 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 107 LEWISTON, ME $23.32 23 PHILIPPI, wv 109 BANGOR, ME $24.21 23 PHILIPPI, wv 110 PORTLAND, ME $23.32 23 PHILIPPI, wv 111 GREENVILLE, ME $24.21 23 PHILIPPI, wv 112 FREDERICK, MD $16.66 23 PHILIPPI, wv 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $9.75 23 PHILIPPI, wv 114 SALISBURY, MD $16.66 23 PHILIPPI, wv 115 BALTIMORE, MD $16.66 23 PHILIPPI, wv 116 BRANDYWINE, MD $16.77 23 PHILIPPI, wv 117 PITTSFIELD, MA $19.25 23 PHILIPPI, wv 118 WORCESTER, MA $21.03 23 PHILIPPI, wv 119 BOSTON, MA $21.03 23 PHILIPPI, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI $22.43 23 PHILIPPI, wv 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $18.21 23 PHI LIPPI, wv 123 DETROIT, MI $17 .24· 23 PHILIPPI, wv 124 TOLEDO, OH $16.88 23 PHILIPPI, wv 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $17.70 23 PHILIPPI, wv 126 MARQUETTE, MI $20.27 23 PHILIPPI, wv 134 GREENVILLE, MS $19.61 23 PHILIPPI, wv 135 TUPELO, MS $18.72 23 PHILIPPI, wv 149 PLYMOUTH, NH $17.53 23 PHILIPPI, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, No.I $21.45 23 PHILIPPI, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA $25.55 23 PHI LIPPI, wv 158 SYRACUSE, NV $20.18 23 PHILIPPI, wv 159 BURLINGTON, VT $18.74 23 PHILIPPI, wv 160 ROCHESTER, NV $20.03 23 PHILIPPI, wv 161 ALBANY, NV $17.60 23 PHILIPPI, wv 162 BUFFALO, NV $17.26 23 PHILIPPI, wv 163 BINGHAMTON, N'v $16.75 23 PHILIPPI, wv 164 OLEAN, NV $17.70 23 PHILIPPI, wv 165 HICKORY, NC $16.71 23 PHILIPPI, wv 167 CHARLOTTE, NC $17.60 23 PHILIPPI, wv 169 FAYETTEVILLE, NC $16.73 23 PHILIPPI, wv 171 ASHEVILLE, NC $17.91 23 PHILIPPI, wv 173 DAYTON, OH $15.77 23 PHILIPPI, wv 174 CLEVELAND, OH $11.66 23 PHILIPPI, wv 175 MANSFIELD, OH $12.08 23 PHILIPPI, wv 176 COLUMBUS, OH $15.84 23 PHILIPPI, wv 177 LIMA, OH $16.64 23 PHILIPPI, wv 178 DUBOIS, PA $10.60 23 PHILIPPI, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $8.48 23 PHILIPPI, wv 180 SANDUSKY, OH $12.08 23 PHILIPPI, wv 181 WHEELING, WV $8.48 23 PHILIPPI, wv 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $15.96 23 PHILIPPI, wv 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $16.18 23 PHILIPPI, wv 195 ALTOONA, PA $11. 13 23 PHILIPPI, wv 196 HARRISBURG, PA $11.87 23 PHILIPPI, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $8.48 23 PHILIPPI, wv 198 SUMTER, sc $19.40 23 PHILIPPI, wv 199 CHARLESTON, sc $18.40 23 PHILIPPI, wv 200 COLUMBIA, sc $18.21 23 PHILIPPI, wv 201 FLORENCE, sc $18.38 23 PHILIPPI, wv 202 SPARTANBURG, sc $16.71 23 PHILIPPI, wv 203 GREENWOOD, sc $19.21 23 PHILIPPI, wv 204 GEORGETOWN, sc $18.38 23 PHILIPPI, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $16.88 23 PHILIPPI, wv 208 NASHVILLE, TN $17.49 23 PHILIPPI, wv 209 JACKSON, TN $19.78 23 PHILIPPI, wv 222 LYNCHBURG, VA $15.62 23 PHILIPPI, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA $17.72 23 PHILIPPI, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA $16.79 23 PHILIPPI, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA $16.90 23 PHILIPPI, wv 226 ROANOKE, VA $15.62 23 PHILIPPI, wv 231 ELKINS, wv $9.54 23 PHILIPPI, wv 232 GASSAWAY, wv $10.60 23 PHILIPPI, wv 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $13.46 23 PHILIPPI, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv $9.39 23 PHILIPPI, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $9.54 23 PHILIPPI, wv 236 BECKLEY, wv $11.87 23 PHILIPPI, wv 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $20.67 23 PHILIPPI, wv 240 MADISON, WI $20.67 26 PEORIA, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $2.57 26 PEORIA, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $6.70 26 PEORIA. IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $11.60 26 PEORIA, IL 68 DUBUQUE, IA $11.26 26 PEORIA, IL 69 DAVENPORT, IA $2.52 26 PEORIA, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $11.09 26 PEORIA, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $8.88 26 PEORIA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $5.81 26 PEORIA, IL 88 WATERLOO, lA $11.26 26 PEORIA, IL 89 MASON CITY, IA $11.26 26 PEORIA, IL 92 DES MOINES, lA $13.82 27 OTTAWA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $13.12 27 OTTAWA, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $6.89 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

27 OTTAWA, IL 122 GRAND RAPIDS, IIIII $7.31 

27 OTTAWA, IL 125 i<ALAMAZOO, MI $7.70 

27 OTTAWA, IL 126 MARQUETTE, MI $7.82 

27 OTTAWA, IL 237 GREEN BAY, WI $5.79 

27 OTTAWA, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $4.54 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $15.22 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $16.54 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 70 ST. LOUIS. MO $12.53 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $11.58 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 74 MARION, IL $11.96 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $16.07 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 7 DECATUR, AL $15.09 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $7.21 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 17 FT. SMITH, AR $12.51 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 19 MONROE, LA $12.72 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 20 JONESBORO, AR $4.03 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $11.24 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $3.18 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 38 PUEBLO, co $5.28 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 50 w. PALM BEACH, FL $43.33 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 51 FT. MEYER, FL $42.44 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 52 TAMPA, FL $42.51 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 56 ATLANTA, GA $24.76 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $13.93 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 66 DANVILLE. IL $4.11 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $15.96 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 68 DUBUQUE, lA $15.98 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 69 DAVENPORT, lA $4.56 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $5.09 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $4.77 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $4.32 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $16.05 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 74 MARION, IL $4 32 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $5.68 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $6.08 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $14.03 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $5.72 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH $5.94 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $5.43 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $6.81 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $7.04 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $5.45 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $4.94 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 85 OMAHA, NE $12.51 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $5.64 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $4.71 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 88 WATERLOO, lA $9.33 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 89 MASON CITY, lA $12.19 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 90 SPENCER·, lA $5.64 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 92 DES MOINES, lA $13.04 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 93 CRESTON, lA $9.54 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $7.42 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 95 SALINA, KS $13.46 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 96 TOPEKA, KS $9.33 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 97 OAKLEY, KS $5.28 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 98 WICHITA, KS $3.07 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 99 PITTSBURG, KS $12.40 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 100 DODGE CITY, KS $3.07 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 104 ELl ZAB ETHTOWN, KY $4.24 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $5.49 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $16.32 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 122 GRAND RAPIDS, IIIII $9.33 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $8.20 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 126 MARQUETTE, IIIII $8.06 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $7.04 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI $15.96 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 129 DULUTH, MN $8.40 

29 MT. VERNON. IL 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $7.21 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 133 WILLMAR, MN $6.49 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $4.88 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $7.65 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 145 LINCOLN, NE $4.39 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $5.53 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $3.16 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 185 ENID, OK $3.16 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 186 TULSA, OK $12.72 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 187 BOISE CITY. OK $5.51 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 188 MCALESTER, OK $1.23 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 189 LAWTON, OK $4.43 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN $5.15 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $4.45 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 211 AMARILLO, TX $5.51 

29 MT VERNON, [L 212 AUSTIN, TX $5.51 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX $7.08 

156 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 215 DALLAS, TX $3.77 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 216 HOUSTON, TX $5.02 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $6.59 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $7.21 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 240 MADISON, WI $14.84 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $4.60 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 17 FT. SMITH, AR $4.60 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 19 MONROE, LA $5.68 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 20 ..JONESBORO, A~ $4.41 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 21 CLARKSVILLE, A~ $4.60 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $6.74 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 65 PEORIA, IL $4.88 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $3.18 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL $12.15 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 68 DUBUQUE, IA $12.51 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 69 DAVENPORT, IA $4.73 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $5.94 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $6.04 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $5.34 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL $8.76 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 74 MARION, IL $7.21 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $4.94 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 76 MUNCIE, IN $7.95 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 77 EVANSVILLE. IN $7.00 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 80 I NO lANA POLIS , IN $5.51 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $5.41 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $8.90 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $6.15 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $4.20 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 85 OMAHA, NE $7.38 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $6.87 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $7.29 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 88 WATERLOO, lA $4.73 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 89 MASON CITY, lA $4.73 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 90 SPENCER, lA $5.81 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 91 OTTUMWA, IA $5.79 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 92 DES MOINES, IA $5.79 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 93 CRESTON, IA $5.79 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $3.52 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 95 SALINA, KS $8.46 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 96 TOPEKA, KS $6.21 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 97 OAKLEY, KS $8.48 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 98 WICHITA, KS $5.68 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 99 PITTSBURG, KS $3.54 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 100 DODGE CITY, KS $5.68 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $2.42 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $6.78 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $7.00 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $6.30 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 123 DETROIT, MI $6.72 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 125 KALAMAZOO, MI $6.44 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 126 MARQUETTE, MI $5.26 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $7.21 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI $12.72 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 129 DULUTH, MN $7.21 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 130 FARGO, NO $5.70 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $7.38 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $9.54 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 133 WILLMAR, MN $6.68 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 137 ..JEFFERSON CITY, MO $10.39 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $3.52 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 145 LINCOLN, NE $8.54 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 172 BISMARK, NO $9.62 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $5.68 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 185 ENID, OK $5.68 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 186 TULSA, OK $4.60 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 187 BOISE CITY, OK $7.82 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 188 MCALESTER, OK $4.62 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 189 LAWTON, OK $6.76 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 205 RAPID CITY, so $9.67 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 206 PIERRE, so $9.75 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $6.76 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 211 AMARILLO, TX $7.82 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 212 AUSTIN, TX $7.84 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 215 DALLAS, TX $7.82 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 216 HOUSTON, TX $7.82 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 237 GREEN BAY, WI $12.04 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 238 WAUSAU, WI $14.61 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $10.39 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 240 MADISON, WI $12.51 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 5 MOBILE, AL $22.05 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 7 DECATUR, AL $18.89 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 18 MEMPHIS, TN $19.14 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 20 ..JONESBORO, AR $12.36 

Tabln 157 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $13.86 31 HARRISBURG, IL 68 DUBUQUE, IA $19.06 31 HARRISBURG, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $14.42 31 HARRISBURG, IL 71 LASALLE, IL $16.56 31 HARRISBURG, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $4.62 31 HARRISBURG, IL 74 MARION, IL $13.55 31 HARRISBURG, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $13.86 31 HARRISBURG, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $14.59 31 HARRISBURG, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $17.26 31 HARRISBURG, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH $20.18 31 HARRISBURG, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $12.00 31 HARRISBURG, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $12.04 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $9.46 31 HARRISBURG, IL 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $9.79 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $11.70 31 HARRISBURG, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI $22.26 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $9.79 31 HARRISBURG, IL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $14.88 31 HARRISBURG, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN $17.24 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 238 WAUSAU, WI $21.20 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $17.53 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 17 FT. SMITH, A~ $14.46 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 20 JONESBORO, A~ $14.50 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 65 PEORIA, IL $11.55 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 66 DANVILLE, IL $8.42 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 67 CHICAGO, IL $14.46 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 69 DAVENPORT, IA $13.63 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $13.14 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 71 LASALLE, IL $13.65 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 72 PADUCAH, KY $14.10 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 73 ROCKFORD, IL $13.65 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 74 MARION, IL $12.59 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $10.94 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 76 MUNCIE, IN $11.60 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $9. 14 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $22.98 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $8.48 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 81 FT. WAYNE, IN $14.14 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 82 SOUTH BEND, IN $14.23 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $9.16 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $9.33 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 99 PITTSBURG, KS $14.48 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $10.37 32 SULLIVAN, IN 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $16.54 32 SULLIVAN, IN 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $21.58 32 SULLIVAN, IN 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $11.98 32 SULLIVAN, IN 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $14.48 32 SULLIVAN, IN 188 MCALESTER, OK $14.46 32 SULLIVAN, IN 237 GREEN BAY, WI $14.48 32 SULLIVAN, IN 238 WAUSAU, WI $17.00 32 SULLIVAN, IN 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $11.98 32 SULLIVAN, IN 240 MADISON, WI $14.50 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $18.19 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $16.43 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $17.62 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 65 PEORIA, IL $17.32 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 68 DUBUQUE, lA $18.51 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 69 DAVENPORT, lA $18.51 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $16.90 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $8.82 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $17.60 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $16.83 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $8.10 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $8.97 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $17.62 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $8.23 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $8.99 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $7.50 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 88 WATERLOO, lA $18.51 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $18.55 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 102 LEXINGTON~- KY $8.63 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $6.49 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.61 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD $6.49 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $8.99 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL $17.98 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL $5.83 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN $16.41 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL $31.59 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN $18.83 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA $16.56 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 68 DUBUQUE, lA $18.00 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $5.91 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $16.60 

158 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $8.59 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY $8.84 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH $16.85 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN $9.46 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $8.90 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $7.91 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY $15.69 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY $8.56 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $6.87 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.54 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI $18.04 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD $6.42 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN $6.42 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $18.97 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 238 WAUSAU, WI $19.57 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $20.01 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 240 MADISON, WI $18.57 37 MARSHALL, TX 19 MONROE, LA $7.38 37 MARSHALL, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $4.56 37 MARSHALL, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $6.36 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $4.73 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $4.73 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $4.66 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $5.30 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 189 LAWTON, OK $12.53 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $12.55 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $21.20 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $14.20 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $21.20 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $12.49 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 211 AMARILLO, TX $10.66 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $4.24 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 213 LAREDO, TX $4.24 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX $4.24 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 215 DALLAS, TX $9.50 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $8.73 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $4.26 40 SAN ANTONIO, TX 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $11.81 43 POTEAU, OK 5 MOBILE, AL $19.69 43 POTEAU, OK 16 LITTLE ROCK, A~ $7.21 43 POTEAU, OK 17 FT. SMITH, AR $6.68 43 POTEAU, OK 18 MEMPHIS, TN $13.44 43 POTEAU, OK 19 MONROE, LA $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 20 JONESBORO, AR $8.76 43 POTEAU, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $3.52 43 POTEAU, OK 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $8.90 43 POTEAU, OK 74 MARION, IL $13.44 43 POTEAU, OK 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $14.18 43 POTEAU, OK 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $11.87 43 POTEAU, OK 95 SALINA, KS $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 96 TOPEKA, KS $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 97 OAKLEY, KS $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 98 WICHITA, KS $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 99 PITTSBURG, KS $1.89 43 POTEAU, OK 100 DODGE CITY, KS $11.89 43 POTEAU, OK 134 GREENVILLE, MS $13.53 43 POTEAU, OK 136 GREENSBORO, NC $13.44 

43 POTEAU, OK 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $11.89 

43 POTEAU, OK 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $4.71 

43 POTEAU, OK 145 LINCOLN, NE $12.89 

43 POTEAU, OK 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $8.27 43 POTEAU, OK 185 ENID, OK $11.02 43 POTEAU, OK 186 TULSA, OK $6.68 

43 POTEAU, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK $6.68 

43 POTEAU, OK 189 LAWTON, OK $11.89 

43 POTEAU, OK 209 JACKSON, TN $13.44 

43 POTEAU, OK 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $11.89 

43 POTEAU, OK 215 DALLAS, TX $10.24 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $5.91 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 52 TAMPA, FL $32.54 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 68 DUBUQUE, IA $18.19 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $9.29 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 95 SALINA, KS $5.70 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 97 OAKLEY, KS $5.70 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 98 WICHITA, KS $9. 12 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 99 PITTSBURG, KS $5.60 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 100 DODGE CITY, KS $4. 13 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $5.60 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $27.41 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 145 LINCOLN, NE $12.49 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $3. 14 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 185 ENID, OK $3.14 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 17 FT. SMITH, AR $8.12 

Tables 159 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG N DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 94 KANSAS CITY. MO $5.64 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 98 WICHITA, KS $6.55 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 99 PITTSBURG, KS $1.04 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 139 SPRINGFIELD. MO $27.37 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 188 MCALESTER, OK $8.12 

48 CLINTON, MO 92 OES MOINES, lA $6.34 

48 CLINTON, MO 94 KANSAS CITY. MO $5.89 

48 CLINTON, MO 95 SALINA, KS $6.23 

48 CLINTON, MO 96 TOPEKA, KS $5.87 

48 CLINTON, MO 97 OAKLEY, KS $6.17 

48 CLINTON, MO 98 WICHITA, KS $10.37 

48 CLINTON, MO 139 SPRINGFIELD. MO $22.62 

49 MACON, MO 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $2.88 

49 MACON, MO 88 WATERLOO, lA $12.04 

49 MACON. MO 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $2.88 

49 MACON, MO 96 TOPEKA, KS $2.88 

49 MACON, MO 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $12.04 

49 MACON, MO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $24.51 

51 MOUND CITY. KS 98 WICHITA, KS $5.72 

56 ALBIA, lA 69 DAVENPORT, lA $2.95 

56 ALBIA, lA 85 OMAHA, NE $6.59 

56 ALBIA, lA 87 SIOUX FALLS. so $4.75 

56 ALBIA, lA 88 WATERLOO, lA $4.60 

56 ALBIA, lA 89 MASON CITY, lA $4.60 

56 ALBIA, lA 90 SPENCER, lA $4.73 

56 ALBIA, lA 91 OTTUMWA, lA $5.77 

56 ALBIA, lA 92 DES MOINES, lA $5.77 

56 ALBIA. lA 93 CRESTON, lA $5.77 

56 ALBIA, lA 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $8.06 

56 ALBIA, lA 95 SALINA, KS $5.58 

56 ALBIA, lA 96 TOPEKA, KS $4.64 

56 ALBIA, lA 97 OAKLEY, KS $5.58 

56 ALBIA, lA 145 LINCOLN, NE $5.58 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 12 LORDSBURG, NM $14.03 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $18.32 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $18.91 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $14.06 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 155 CLOVIS, NM $11.36 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 211 AMARILLO, TX $10.39 

61 RATON, NM 12 LORDSBURG, NM $11.47 

61 RATON, NM 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $41.95 

61 RATON, NM 34 LA JUNTA, co $15. 18 

61 RATON, NM 38 PUEBLO, co $15.22 

61 RATON, NM 39 ALAMOSA, co $15.18 

61 RATON, NM 152 ALBUQUERQUE. NM $11.47 

61 RATON, NM 153 EL PASO, TX $8.56 

61 RATON, NM 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $11.47 

61 RATON, NM 155 CLOVIS, NM $11.47 

61 RATON, NM 156 SOCORRO NM $8.56 

61 RATON, NM 157 SANTE FE, NM $8.48 

61 RATON, NM 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $14.97 

61 RATON, NM 185 ENID, OK $14.97 

61 RATON, NM 187 BOISE CITY, OK $11.47 

61 RATON, NM 211 AMARILLO, TX $11.47 

61 RATON, NM 213 LAREDO, TX $21.22 

61 RATON, NM 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $14.97 

62 GUNNISON, co 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $31.67 

62 GUNNISON, co 29 SAN DIEGO, CA $24.42 

62 GUNNISON, co 34 LA JUNTA, co $7.42 

62 GUNNISON, co 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $10.60 

62 GUNNISON, co 36 DENVER, co $11.98 

62 GUNNISON, co 37 GREELEY, co $11.98 

62 GUNNISON, co 38 PUEBLO, co $5.85 

62 GUNNISON, co 39 ALAMOSA. co $8.84 

62 GUNNISON, co 61 POCATELLO, ID $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 63 TWIN FALLS, 10 $29.68 

62 GUNNISON, co 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 95 SALINA, KS $15.07 

62 GUNNISON, co 96 TOPEKA, KS $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 97 OAKLEY, KS $15.09 

62 GUNNISON, co 98 WICHITA, KS $15.07 

62 GUNNISON, co 100 DODGE CITY, KS $15.09 

62 GUNNISON, co 144 MISSOULA, MT $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 145 LINCOLN, NE $17.41 

62 GUNNISON, co 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $24.44 

62 GUNNISON, co 157 SANTE FE, NM $52.55 

62 GUNNISON, co 184 OKLAHOMA CITY. OK $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 185 ENID, OK $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 187 BOISE CITY, OK $18.21 

62 GUNNISON, co 189 LAWTON, OK $18.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $27.56 

62 GUNNISON, co 219 MORGAN, UT $25.44 

62 GUNNISON, co 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $15.26 

62 GUNNISON, co 241 CASPER, WY $16.96 

160 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

62 GUNNISON, co 242 CHEYENNE, WY $11.98 

62 GUNNISON, co 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $25.44 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 34 LA JUNTA, co $8.95 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS. co 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $8.95 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS. co 36 DENVER, co $10.41 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 38 PUEBLO, co $9.16 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS. co 39 ALAMOSA, co $8.95 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $4.24 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 157 SANTE FE, NM $52.66 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 219 MORGAN, UT $8.93 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $8.95 

63 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, co 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $8.93 

66 RAWLINS, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $19.08 

66 RAWLINS, WY 36 DENVER, co $11.58 

66 RAWLINS, WY 37 GREELEY, co $10.60 

66 RAWLINS, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $8.93 

66 RAWLINS, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $21.20 

66 RAWLINS, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $23.32 

66 RAWLINS, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $33.71 

66 RAWLINS, WY 205 RAPID CITY, SD $23.32 

66 RAWLINS, WY 206 PIERRE, SD $30.13 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $8.80 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $11.94 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 36 DENVER, co $19.93 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 37 GREELEY, co $5.58 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $23.32 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $8.80 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $11.94 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL $28.98 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $32. 10 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 85 OMAHA, NE $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 87 SIOUX FALLS. SD $15.84 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 95 SALINA, KS $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 97 OAKLEY, KS $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 98 'WICHITA, KS $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 100 DODGE CITY. KS $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 133 WILLMAR, MN $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD. MO $15.84 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 142 HELENA, MT $15.84 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 144 MISSOULA, MT $15.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $9.60 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY. WY 148 RENO, NV $55 61 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 205 RAPID CITY, SD $14 .63 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 206 PIERRE, SD $18 66 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY. WY 241 CASPER, WY $15 84 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $15 .84 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $27 45 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 15 PHOENIX, AZ $21 .45 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 11 FT SMITH, A~ $30. 59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 23 LONE PINE, CA $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $26 .80 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 25 SALINAS, CA $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 26 EUREKA, CA $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 27 WESTWOOD, CA $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 28 SACRAMENTO, CA $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 29 SAN DIEGO, CA $21 22 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA $26 80 

68 ROCK SPRINGS. WY 31 FRESNO, CA $23 85 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 32 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA $24 34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $24 .34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $18 08 

6!3 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION. co $8 71 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 36 DENVER, co $20. 48 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 37 GREELEY, co $20 48 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $18.08 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $18.08 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $8 71 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 61 POCATELLO, ID $15 01 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 62 SPOKANE, WA $30 57 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 63 TWIN FALLS. IO $15.01 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 64 BOISE, ID $18. 13 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $27 45 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 95 SALINA, KS $24.34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 96 TOPEKA, KS $27 45 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 97 OAKLEY, KS $24.34 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $28.66 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 140 BILLINGS, MT $23.87 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $23.87 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 142 HELENA, MT $28.66 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 143 MILES CITY, MT $20.78 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $29.76 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $19.82 

Tabh•s 161 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $19.82 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $28.79 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 156 SOCORRO NM $28.79 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $27.45 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 185 ENID, OK $27.45 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 186 TULSA, OK $30.59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 188 MCALESTER, OK $30.59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 190 BEND, OR $29.55 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 191 PENDLETON, OR $30.61 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 192 ASTORIA, OR $29.55 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 193 PORTLAND, OR $29.55 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 194 MEDFORD, OR $27.24 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $30.59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 206 PIERRE, so $30.59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $7.42 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $8.71 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 227 WENATCHEE, WA $30.59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 230 YAKIMA, WA $30.59 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 241 CASPER, WY $21.86 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $21.86 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $7.42 

70 PRICE, UT 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $16.96 

70 PRICE, UT 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $27.41 

70 PRICE, UT 15 PHOENIX, AZ $27.50 

70 PRICE, UT 17 FT. SMITH, A~ $30.66 

70 PRICE, UT 23 LONE PINE, CA $24.40 

70 PRICE, UT 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $26.78 

70 PRICE, UT 25 SALINAS, CA $24.40 

70 PRICE, UT 26 EUREKA, CA $24.38 

70 PRICE, UT 27 WESTWOOD, CA $24.40 

70 PRICE, UT 28 SACRAMENTO, CA $24.40 

70 PRICE, UT 29 SAN DIEGO, CA $21.28 

70 PRICE, UT 30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA $26.84 

70 PRICE, UT 31 FRESNO, CA $23.93 

70 PRICE, UT 32 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA $24.38 

70 PRICE, UT 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $24.80 

70 PRICE, UT 34 LA JUNTA, co $18.15 

70 PRICE, UT 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $5.87 

70 PRICE, UT 36 DENVER, co $20.54 

70 PRICE, UT 37 GREELEY, co $20.54 

70 PRICE, UT 38 PUEBLO, co $18.04 

70 PRICE, UT 39 ALAMOSA, CO $18.15 

70 PRICE, UT 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $8.78 

70 PRICE, UT 61 POCATELLO, ID $15.01 

70 PRICE, UT 62 SPOKANE, WA $30.70 

70 PRICE, UT 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $14.99 

70 PRICE, UT 64 BOISE, ID $18.06 

70 PRICE, UT 79 CINCINNATI, OH $52.45 

70 PRICE, UT 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $27.50 

70 PRICE, UT 95 SALINA, KS $24.40 

70 PRICE, UT 96 TOPEKA, KS $27.50 

70 PRICE, UT 97 OAKLEY, KS $24.40 

70 PRICE, UT 139 SPRINGFIELD; MO $28.73 

70 PRICE, UT 140 BILLINGS, MT $23.93 

70 PRICE, UT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $23.93 

70 PRICE, UT 142 HELENA, MT $28.64 

70 PRICE, UT 143 MILES CITY, MT $20.82 

70 PRICE, UT 145 LINCOLN, NE $29.83 

70 PRICE, UT 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $19.89 

70 PRICE, UT 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $19.86 

70 PRICE, UT 153 EL PASO, TX $28.85 

70 PRICE, UT 156 SOCORRO NM $28.85 

70 PRICE, UT 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $27.50 

70 PRICE, UT 185 ENID, OK $27.50 

70 PRICE, UT 186 TULSA, OK $30.66 

70 PRICE, UT 188 MCALESTER, OK $30.66 

70 PRICE, UT 190 BEND, OR $29.51 

70 PRICE, UT 191 PENDLETON, OR $30.63 

70 PRICE, UT 192 ASTORIA, OR $29.60 

70 PRICE, UT 193 PORTLAND, OR $29.60 

70 PRICE, UT 194 MEDFORD, OR $27.31 

70 PRICE, UT 205 RAPID CITY, so $30.66 

70 PRICE, UT 206 PIERRE, so $30.66 

70 PRICE, UT 219 MORGAN, UT $5.87 

70 PRICE, UT 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $5.87 

70 PRICE, UT 227 WENATCHEE, WA $30.59 

70 PRICE, UT 230 YAKIMA, WA $30.72 

70 PRICE, UT 241 CASPER, WY $21.90 

70 PRICE, UT 242 CHEYENNE, WY $21.90 

70 PRICE, UT 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $8.78 

75 FORSYTH, MT 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $12.76 

75 FORSYTH, MT 140 BILLINGS, MT $10.47 

75 FORSYTH, MT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $10.47 

75 FORSYTH, MT 142 HELENA, MT $12.76 

162 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION (1985 $/TON) 

75 FORSYTH, MT 148 RENO, NV $55.37 75 FORSYTH, MT 172 BISMARK, NO $14.33 75 FORSYTH, MT 205 RAPID CITY, so $11.74 75 FORSYTH, MT 206 PIERRE, so $11.83 80 MINOT, NO 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $15.05 80 MINOT, NO 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $15.05 80 MINOT, NO 129 DULUTH, MN $15.31 80 MINOT, NO 130 FARGO, NO $8.71 80 MINOT, NO 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $15.05 80 MINOT, NO 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $8.84 80 MINOT, NO 133 WILLMAR, MN $15.01 80 MINOT, NO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $15.20 80 MINOT, NO 140 BILLINGS, MT $15.05 80 MINOT, NO 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $15.05 80 MINOT, NO 142 HELENA, MT $15.22 80 MINOT, NO 148 RENO, NV $49.35 80 MINOT, NO 172 BISMARK, NO $8.06 87 CENTRALIA, WA 62 SPOKANE, WA $14.03 87 CENTRALIA, WA 64 BOISE, ID $19.89 87 CENTRALIA, WA 190 BEND, OR $14.73 87 CENTRALIA, WA 191 PENDLETON, OR $13.76 87 CENTRALIA, WA 192 ASTORIA, OR $11.87 87 CENTRALIA, WA 193 PORTLAND, OR $11.91 87 CENTRALIA, WA 194 MEDFORD, OR $17.91 87 CENTRALIA, WA 227 WENATCHEE, WA $14.08 87 CENTRALIA, WA 228 OLYMPIA, WA $11.94 87 CENTRALIA, WA 229 SEATTLE, WA $11.91 87 CENTRALIA, WA 230 YAKIMA, WA $13.78 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 12 LORDSBURG, NM $11.47 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $21.18 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $15.50 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 15 PHOENIX, AZ $18.04 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 34 LA JUNTA, CO $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $21.16 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 38 PUEBLO, CO $18.06 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 39 ALAMOSA, CO $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $21.16 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 95 SALINA, KS $17.72 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 97 OAKLEY, KS $17.72 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 98 WICHITA, KS $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 100 DODGE CITY, KS $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $11.47 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 153 EL PASO, TX $11.47 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $11.47 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 155 CLOVIS, NM $8.56 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 156 SOCORRO NM $11.47 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 157 SANTE FE, NM $49.54 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $14.97 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 185 ENID, OK $14.97 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 186 TULSA, OK $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 187 BOISE CITY, OK $11.47 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 189 LAWTON, OK $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $18.08 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 211 AMARILLO, TX $11.47 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 215 DALLAS, TX $19.65 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $18.04 90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $14.97 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 12 LORDSBURG, NM $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $15.50 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 24 LOS ANGELES, CA $41.95 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 95 SALINA, KS $17.72 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 97 OAKLEY, KS $17.72 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 153 EL PASO, TX $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 155 CLOVIS, NM $8.56 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 156 SOCORRO NM $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 157 SANTE FE, NM $49.54 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $14.97 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 185 ENID, OK $14.97 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 187 BOISE CITY, OK $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 211 AMARILLO, TX $11.47 91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $14.97 92 CARBON CTY, WY 34 LA JUNTA, CO $14.84 92 CARBON CTY, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $17.38 92 CARBON CTY, WY 36 DENVER, co $8.06 92 CARBON CTY, WY 37 GREELEY, co $5.55 92 CARBON CTY, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $10 60 92 CARBON CTY, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $16.96 92 CARBON CTY, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $14.84 92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $32.78 92 CARBON CTY, WY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $27 73 92 CARBON CTY, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $19 50 92 CARBON CTY, WY 95 SALINA, KS $19.08 

Tab,es 163 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG N SUPPLY REGION REG N DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $17.38 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $17.38 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 206 PIERRE, so $19.08 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 13 LAS VEGAS, NV $27.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 17 FT. SMITH, A~ $24.55 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 23 LONE PINE, CA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 25 SALINAS, CA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 28 SACRAMENTO, CA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 29 SAN DIEGO, CA $24.53 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 31 FRESNO, CA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 32 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co· 33 SAN BERNADINO, CA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 34 LA .JUNTA, CO $8.95 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 35 GRAND .JUNCTION, co $8.95 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 36 DENVER, CO $10.41 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 37 GREELEY, CO $12.11 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 38 PUEBLO, co $9.16 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 39 ALAMOSA, co $8.95 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $4.24 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 61 POCATELLO, ID $18.30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $18.30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 64 BOISE, ID $24.55 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 68 DUBUQUE, lA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 69 DAVENPORT, IA $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $24.34 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 74 MARION, IL $29.21 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 85 OMAHA, NE $21.31 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $21.43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $24.91 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 88 WATERLOO, IA $27.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 89 MASON CITY, IA $27.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 90 SPENCER, lA $24.55 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 91 OTTUMWA, IA $24.55 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 92 DES MOINES, IA $24.34 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 93 CRESTON, IA $24.55 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $18.30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 95 SALINA, KS $15.18 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 96 TOPEKA, KS $18.30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 97 OAKLEY, KS $15.20 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 98 WICHITA, KS $15.18 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 99 PITTSBURG, KS $21.43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 100 DODGE CITY, KS $15 20 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 133 WILLMAR, MN $21 d3 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 137 .JEFFERSON CITY, MO $27 64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $21 43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $21 43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 142 HELENA, MT $21 43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 143 MILES CITY, MT $27 6--1 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 144 MISSOULA, MT $18 3C• 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 145 LINCOLN, NE $17 51 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $24 3'3 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY. co 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $24 51 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 153 EL PASO, TX $21 Jg 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 156 SOCORRO NM $:11 :Jg 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 157 SANTE FE, NM $52 66 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 172 BISMARK, NO $27 6·t 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 184 OKLAHOMA CITY. OK $18 30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 185 ENID, OK $18 10 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 186 TULSA, OK $21 43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 187 BOISE CITY. OK $18 32 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 188 MCALESTER, OK $24 55 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 189 LAWTON, OK $18 30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 205 RAPID CITY, so $21 45 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 206 PIERRE, so $21 43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 210 WICHITA, FALLS. TX $18.30 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 211 AMARILLO, TX $27.22 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 212 AUSTIN, TX $27.64 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 215 DALLAS, TX $21.43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $21.43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 219 MORGAN, UT $21.20 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $12.72 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 241 CASPER, WY $12.08 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 242 CHEYENNE, WY $12.08 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $8.93 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $18.08 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 35 GRAND .JUNCTION, co $8.71 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 36 DENVER, co $20.48 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 37 GREELEY, co $20.48 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $18.08 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 39 ALAMOSA, co $18.08 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $8.71 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 61 POCATELLO, ID $15.01 

164 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $15.01 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 64 BOISE, ID $18.13 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL $46.36 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 143 MILES CITY, MT $20.78 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $19.82 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 147 WINNEMUCA, NV $19.82 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $5.81 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $8.71 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $3.18 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 12 LORDSBURG, NM $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 17 FT. SMITH, AR $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 34 LA JUNTA, CO $17.96 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 36 DENVER, co $16.20 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 37 GREELEY, CO $22.47 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 38 PUEBLO, CO $27.56 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 39 ALAMOSA, CO $17.96 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 61 POCATELLO, IO $21.12 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 62 SPOKANE, WA $22.45 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $21.12 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 64 BOISE, ID $30.04 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL $26.63 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL $35.32 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, lA $24.21 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 69 DAVENPORT, lA $24.21 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $27.41 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 73 ROCKFORD, IL $30.55 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 85 OMAHA, NE $17.96 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $22.47 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $18.06 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 88 WATERLOO, lA $21.24 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 89 MASON CITY, lA $21.20 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 90 SPENCER, lA $17.96 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 91 OTTUMWA, lA $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 92 DES MOINES, lA $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 93 CRESTON, lA $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 95 SALINA, KS $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 96 TOPEKA, KS $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 97 OAKLEY, KS $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 98 WICHITA, KS $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 99 PITTSBURG, KS $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 100 DODGE CITY, KS $21.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 123 DETROIT, Ml $41.34 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 124 TOLEDO, OH $44.46 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 12(; MARQUETTE, MI $28.43 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $21.20 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI $28.98 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 129 DULUTH, MN $22.87 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 130 FARGO, NO $18.40 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $19.82 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $18.06 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 133 WILLMAR, MN $18.00 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $12.76 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 140 BILLINGS, MT $10.47 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $10.47 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 142 HELENA, MT $12.76 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT $14.86 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 144 MISSOULA, MT $17.96 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 145 LINCOLN, NE $25.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 148 RENO, NV $55.37 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 154 LAS VEGAS, NM $24.19 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 155 CLOVIS, NM $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 172 BISMARK, NO $14.33 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 184 OKLAHOMA C lTV, OK $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 185 ENID, OK $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 186 TULSA, OK $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 187 BOISE CITY, OK $24.21 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 188 MCALESTER, OK $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 189 LAWTON, OK $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 191 PENDLETON, OR $30.46 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 205 RAPID CITY, so $20.14 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 206 PIERRE, so $19.08 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $27.31 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 211 AMARILLO, TX $24. 19 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 215 DALLAS, TX $30.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 219 MORGAN, UT $28.54 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $28.54 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 227 WENATCHEE , WA $22.45 

Ta~les 165 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 228 OLYMPIA, WA $28.54 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 229 SEATTLE, WA $28.54 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 230 YAKIMA, WA $30.46 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 237 GREEN BAY, WI $28.43 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 238 WAUSAU, WI $30.23 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 240 MADISON, WI $28.92 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 241 CASPER, WY $15.65 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 242 CHEYENNE, WY $23.32 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $28.54 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 12 LORDSBURG, NM $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 17 FT. SMITH, AR $24.40 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 19 MONROE, LA $30.66 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 20 JONESBORO, A~ $30.66 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 21 CLARKSVILLE. A~ $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 34 LA JUNTA, co $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 36 DENVER, co $16.96 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 37 GREELEY, co $16.96 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 38 PUEBLO, co $8.80 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 39 ALAMOSA, CO $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 61 POCATELLO, ID $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 62 SPOKANE, WA $30.68 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 63 TWIN FALLS, ID $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 64 BOISE, ID $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 65 PEORIA, IL $28.98 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 68 DUBUQUE, lA $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 69 DAVENPORT, IA $24.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $24.76 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 73 ROCKFORD, IL $27.62 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 74 MARION, IL $29.09 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 85 OMAHA, NE $15.05 

96 POWDER RIVER B-ASIN, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, lA $15.05 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 88 WATERLOO, IA $24.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 89 MASON CITY, lA $24.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 90 SPENCER, lA $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 91 OTTUMWA, lA $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 92 DES MOINES, lA $18.23 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 93 CRESTON, IA $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MD $18.17 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 95 SALINA, KS $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 96 TOPEKA, KS $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 97 OAKLEY, KS $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 98 WICHITA, KS $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 99 PITTSBURG, KS $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 100 DODGE CITY, KS $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 126 MARQUETTE, MI $30.34 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $29.32 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI $29.09 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 129 DULUTH, MN $23.89 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 13_0 FARGO, NO $24.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $30.97 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $29.32 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 133 WILLMAR, MN $25.44 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO $25.55 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $15.84 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 140 BILLINGS, MT $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 142 HELENA, MT $15.84 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 143 MILES CITY, MT $24.42 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 144 MISSOULA, MT $21.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 145 LINCOLN, NE $21.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE $33.73 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 148 RENO, NV $55.61 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 153 EL PASO, TX $21.92 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 155 CLOVIS, NM $27.52 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 156 SOCORRO NM $21.92 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 172 BISMARK, NO $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK $18.15 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 185 ENID, OK $18.15 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 186 TULSA, OK $21.31 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 187 BOISE CITY, OK $18.17 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 188 MCALESTER, OK $24.40 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 189 LAWTON, OK $18.15 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 205 RAPID CITY, so $15.90 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 206 PIERRE, so $16.96 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX $18.15 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 211 AMARILLO, TX $23.91 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 212 AUSTIN, TX $27.52 

166 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F6. Transport rates for coal shipments by regular rail-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 215 DALLAS, TX $21.28 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 216 HOUSTON, TX $30.66 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX $30.66 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 218 SAN ANGELO, TX $21.28 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 219 MORGAN, UT $21.92 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT $21.92 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 227 WENATCHEE, WA $30.68 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 237 GREEN BAY, WI $30.34 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 238 WAUSAU, WI $27.28 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI $30.57 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 240 MADISON, WI $28.92 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 241 CASPER, WY $15.84 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 242 CHEYENNE, WY $15.84 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $22.03 

97 FORT UNION, MT 68 DUBUQUE, IA $18.04 97 FORT UNION, MT 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $18.04 

97 FORT UNION, MT 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $14.95 97 FORT UNION, MT 88 WATERLOO, IA $18.04 97 FORT UNION, MT 89 MASON CITY, IA $18.04 97 FORT UNION, MT 90 SPENCER, IA $18.04 97 FORT UNION, MT 126 MARQUETTE, MI $20.80 97 FORT UNION, MT 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $14.95 97 FORT UNION, MT 129 DULUTH, MN $15.20 

97 FORT UNION, MT 130 FARGO, NO $12.72 97 FORT UNION, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $14.95 97 FORT UNION, MT 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $12.72 97 FORT UNION, MT 133 WILLMAR, MN $14.95 97 FORT UNION, MT 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $15.09 97 FORT UNION, MT 140 BILLINGS, MT $14.95 97 FORT UNION, MT 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $14.95 97 FORT UNION, MT 142 HELENA, MT $12.19 97 FORT UNION, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT $21.20 97 FORT UNION, MT 148 RENO, NV $49.27 97 FORT UNION, MT 172 BISMARK, NO $9.54 97 FORT UNION, MT 205 RAPID CITY, so $18.04 97 FORT UNION, MT 206 PIERRE, so $18.04 98 FORT UNION, NO 68 DUBUQUE, IA $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 85 OMAHA, NE $18.17 98 FORT UNION, NO 86 SIOUX CITY, IA $11.96 

98 FORT UNION, NO 87 SIOUX FALLS, so $11.96 98 FORT UNION, NO 88 WATERLOO, lA $18. 17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 89 MASON CITY, IA $18. 17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 90 SPENCER, IA $15.05 

98 FORT UNION, NO 91 OTTUMWA, IA $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 92 DES MOINES, IA $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 93 CRESTON, IA $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 126 MARQUETTE, MI $20.90 

98 FORT UNION, NO 127 ST. CLOUD, MN $12.72 

98 FORT UNION, NO 129 DULUTH, MN $14.78 

98 FORT UNION, NO 130 FARGO, NO $8.71 

98 FORT UNION, NO 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN $12.72 

98 FORT UNION, NO 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN $10.60 

98 FORT UNION, NO 133 WILLMAR, MN $11.89 

98 FORT UNION, NO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD $14.42 

98 FORT UNION, NO 140 BILLINGS, MT $15.05 

98 FORT UNION, NO 141 GREAT FALLS, MT $15.06 

98 FORT UNION, NO 142 HELENA, MT $14.42 

98 FORT UNION, NO 143 MILES CITY, MT $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 144 MISSOULA, MT $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 148 RENO, NV $49.35 

98 FORT UNION, NO 172 BISMARK, NO $15.14 

98 FORT UNION, NO 205 RAPID CITY, so $18.17 

98 FORT UNION, NO 206 PIERRE, so $18.27 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 36 DENVER, co $4.75 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 37 GREELEY, CO • $4.24 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 38 PUEBLO, co $4.75 

99 DENVER BASIN, CD 148 RENO, NV $55.52 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 241 CASPER, WY $5.55 

99 DENVER BASIN, co 242 CHEYENNE, WY $2.65 

Tabfes 167 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK (1985 $/TON) 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $4.03 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5 MOBILE, AL BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $5.43 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7 DECATUR, AL BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $11.41 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 74 MARION, IL BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $12.64 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $12.08 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 135 TUPELO, MS BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $5.53 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $12.64 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 209 JACKSON, TN BLACK WARRIOR RIVER IN AQCR 4 $11.28 

4 JASPER, TN 5 MOBILE, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $8.78 

4 JASPER, TN 7 DECATUR, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $3.60 

4 JASPER, TN 7 DECATUR, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $6.55 

4 JASPER, TN 20 JONESBORO. A It TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $8.31 

4 JASPER, TN 20 JONESBORO. A~ TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.53 

4 JASPER, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $4.69 

4 JASPER, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $5.47 

4 JASPER, TN 70 ST. LOUIS, MO TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $8.67 

4 JASPER. TN 74 MARION, IL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $7.14 

4 JASPER, TN 74 MARION, IL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $10.37 

4 JASPER, TN 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $10.66 

4 JASPER, TN 77 EVANSVILLE, IN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $8.69 

4 JASPER, TN 83 BLOOMINGTON. IN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $10.71 

4 JASPER, TN 106 NEW ORLEANS. LA TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $15.43 

4 JASPER, TN 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $18.66 

4 JASPER, TN 135 TUPELO, MS TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $5.87 

4 JASPER, TN 135 TUPELO, MS TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $9.09 

4 JASPER, TN 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $10.85 

'4 JASPER, TN 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $7.14 

4 JASPER, TN 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $10.37 

4 JASPER, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $3.33 

4 JASPER, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $6.83 

4 JASPER, TN 209 JACKSON, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $5.75 

4 JASPER, TN 209 JACKSON, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $9.46 

4 JASPER, TN 216 HOUSTON, TX TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 7 $17.11 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 1 JACKSON, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $16.83 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 5 MOBILE, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $12.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 7 DECATUR, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $6.55 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 20 JONESBORO, AR TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.53 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $4.69 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 70 ST. LOUIS, MO TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.89 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 74 MARION, IL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $10.37 

7 OAK RIDGE. TN 77 EVANSVILLE, IN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.91 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 135 TUPELO, MS TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $9.09 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $10.37 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $3.33 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 209 JACKSON, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $9.46 

8 LEBANON, VA 7 DECATUR, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.28 

8 LEBANON, VA 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $9.41 

8 LEBANON, VA 79 CINCINNATI, OH KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $12.21 

8 LEBANON, VA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $10.22 

8 LEBANON, VA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $11.68 

8 LEBANON, VA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $8.06 

8 LEBANON, VA 234 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $10.07 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $12.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $10.77 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $12.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $11.66 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $8.78 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $12.70 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $10.24 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $11.74 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 197 PITTSBURGH, PA KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $12.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $8.63 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 7 DECATUR, AL TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $14.31 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $12.44 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $14.50 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12.49 

10 MlDDLESBORO, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $13.84 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12.49 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12.49 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN. KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $14.63 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.09 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $10.18 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.64 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $8.25 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $10.18 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.64 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $10.90 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $9.37 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $9.86 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $10.18 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.64 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN TENNESSEE RIVER IN AQCR 207 $11.45 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 $10.32 

12 SALYERSVILLE. KY 5 MOBILE, AL KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $17.45 

168 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP 

REG # SUPPLY REGION 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, DH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, DH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, DH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

14 CADIZ, OH 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

OEM 

REG # DEMAND REGION 

5 MOBILE, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

72 PADUCAH, KY 

72 PADUCAH, KY 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

101 HAZARD, KY 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

207 KNOXVILLE, TN 

207 KNOXVILLE, TN 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

5 MOBILE, AL 

5 MOBILE, AL 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

101 HAZARD, KY 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

5 MOBILE, AL 

5 MOBILE, AL 

5 MOBILE, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 

77 EVANSViLLE, IN 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

101 HAZARD, KY 

101 HAZARD, KY 

101 HAZARD, KY 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

LOADING DOCK 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KENTUCKY & OHIO IN AQCR 79 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

RATE 

(198<; $/TON) 

$20.35 

$14.61 

$17.53 

$10.94 

$13.61 

$9.39 

$12.06 

$7.38 

$10.07 

$5.45 

$8.14 

$7.38 

$10.07 

$7.87 

$6.34 

$9.26 

$3.46 

$9.75 

$7.38 

$10.07 

$9.46 

$4.92 

$6.42 

$13.33 

$7.31 

$17.83 

$20.73 

$11.72 

$14.63 

$3.31 

$10.22 

$8.33 

$17.45 

$37.12 

$9.39 

$7.38 

$5.45 

$24.85 

$7.38 

$7:87 

$6.34 

$3.46 

$22.85 

$7.38 

$9.46 

$4.92 

$20.78 

$6.42 

$19.27 

$7.31 

$11.72 

$31.40 

$3.31 

$8.33 

$8.73 

$9.92 

$6.74 

$4.66 

$3.16 

$3.75 

$6.89 

$4.75 

$21.01 

$21.92 

$22.87 

$18.19 

$19.08 

$20.03 

$12.66 

$13.48 

$14.20 

$10.64 

$11.47 

$12.19 

$8.73 

$9.56 

$10.28 

$10.64 

$11.47 

$12.19 

$11.45 

$12.34 

$13.29 

$9.92 

Tablt'!S 169 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP 

REG H SUPPLY REGION 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

17 KITTANNING, PA 

18 SHARON, PA 

18 SHARON, PA 

18 SHARON, PA 

18 SHAROr\1, PA 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

20 SOMERSET, PA 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

21 CHARLESTON, WV 

OEM 

REG H DEMAND REGION 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 

101 HAZARD, KY 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

235 CLARKSBURG,· WV 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

179 PARKERSBURG, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

181 WHEELING, WV 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 

5 MOBILE, AL 

5 MOBILE, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

7 DECATUR, AL 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 

20 JONESBORO,·AR 

20 JONESBORO, A~ 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 

65 PEORIA, It 

65 PEORIA, ll 

67 CHICAGO, IL 

67 CHICAGO, IL 

68 DUBUQUE, lA 

68 DUBUQUE, lA 

69 DAVENPORT, lA 

69 DAVENPORT, lA 

70 ST. LOUIS, MD 

70 ST. LOUIS, MO 

71 LASALLE, lL 

71 LASALLE, IL 

72 PADUCAH, KY 

72 PADUCAH, KY 

74 MARION, IL 

LOADING DOCK 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO. MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

OHIO, MONONGAH & ALLEGHY IN AQCR 197 

MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 

KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 

170 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

RATE 

(1985 $/TON) 

$10.81 

$11.79 

$6.74 

$7.57 

$8.29 

$10.64 

$11.47 

$12.19 

$13.04 

$13.93 

$4.66 

$5.49 

$6.19 

$3.16 

$4.01 

$4.71 

$3.10 

$3.75 

$3.82 

$15.29 

$16.18 

$17. 15 

$6.89 

$7.78 

$3.56 

$3.82 

$4.75 

$11.47 

$9.56 

$11.47 

$12.34 

$10.81 

$7.57 

$11.47 

$5.49 

$4.01 

$3.10 

$7.78 

$3.82 

$13.14 

$11.66 

$10.75 

$11 .47 

$14.39 

$12.32 

$10.83 

$9.92 

$14.61 

$10.64 

$11.89 

$9.82 

$11.68 

$8.33 

$10.20 

$7.42 

$9.31 

$12. 11 

$8.14 

$9.05 

$17.45 

$17.91 

$14.61 

$15.07 

$13.27 

$13.72 

$11.49 

$11.96 

$16.47 

$16.94 

$15.07 

$15.54 

$16.79 

$17.26 

$17.21 

$17.68 

$16.05 

$16.49. 

$11.85 

$12.32 

$15.45 

$15.92 

$10.94 

$12.02 

$10.94 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK { 1985 $/TON) 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 74 MARION, IL KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $12.02 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $13.84 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $14.31 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 77 EVANSVILLE, IN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $9.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 77 EVANSVILLE, IN KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $10.47 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, "KY KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $8.46 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $5.45 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $6.53 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $18.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $8.46 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 88 WATERLOO, IA KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $17.21 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 88 WATERLOO, lA KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $17.68 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 94 KANSAS CITY, MO KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $15.73 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 94 KANSAS CITY, MO KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $16.20 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 101 HAZARD, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.87 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 102 LEXINGTON, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $6.34 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $3.46 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $4.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, WV MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $16.11 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.38 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $8.46 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $9.46 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $9.92 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 128 LA CROSSE, WI KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $18.74 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 134 GREENVILLE, MS KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $16.39 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 134 GREENVILLE, MS KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $16.85 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 135 TUPELO, MS KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $14.54 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 135 TUPELO, MS KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $14.99 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $14.03 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $14.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $10.94 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $12.02 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, WV KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $4.92 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $6.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $14.01 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 181 WHEELING, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $6.42 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 181 WHEELING, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $8.12 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 181 WHEELING, wv MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $12.53 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.31 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $9.01 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $11.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $17.83 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $18.30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 208 NASHVILLE, TN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $11.72 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 208 NASHVILLE, TN KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $12. 17 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 209 JACKSON, TN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $11.70 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 209 JACKSON, TN KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $12.17 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $3.31 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $3.31 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $8.33 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $11.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 78 LOUISVILLE, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $5.45 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $6.53 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 102 LEXINGTON, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $6.34 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $3.46 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $4.54 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.38 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, WV KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $4.92 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $6.64 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 181 WHEELING, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $6.42 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $7.31 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA RIVER IN AQCR 103 $3.31 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv KANAWHA & OHIO IN AQCR 103 $3.31 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 $10.11 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 18"1 WHEELING, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 $8.61 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 181 WHEELING, wv MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $10.20 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 $9.20 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 197 PITTSBURGH, PA MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $9.31 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv MONONGAHELA RIVER IN AQCR 235 $9.05 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 181 $10.20 

26 PEORIA, IL 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $3.03 

26 PEORIA, IL 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $3.82 

26 PEORIA, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 $4.62 

26 PEORIA, IL 68 DUBUQUE, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $4.32 

26 PEORIA, IL 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $5.17 

26 PEORIA, IL 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $3.14 

26 PEORIA, IL 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $4.01 

26 PEORIA, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $6.06 

26 PEORIA, IL 71 LASALLE, IL ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 $3.29 

26 PEORIA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 $4.45 

TableB 171 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP 

REG H 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

26 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

28 

28 

28 

28 

28 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

29 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

30 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

31 

SUPPLY REGION 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

OTTAWA, IL 

TAYLORVILLE, IL 

TAYLORVILLE, IL 

TAYLORVILLE, IL 

TAYLORVILLE, IL 

TAYLORVILLE, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

NT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON. IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

MT. VERNON, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

TUSCOLA, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, I L 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

HARRISBURG, IL 

OEM 

REG H 

88 

88 

128 

137 

137 

137 

67 

67 

71 

71 

75 

75 

137 

65 

67 

71 

75 

137 

7 

7 

18 

20 

65 

65 

65 

67 

67 

68 

69 

70 

70 

71 

71 

72 

72 

72 

74 

74 

74 

75 

75 

75 

77 

77 

78 

78 

79 

88 

105 

128 

137 

137 

137 

138 

138 

138 

208 

208 

209 

65 

67 

70 

71 

71 

75 

75 

75 

77 

137 4 

5 

7 

16 

18 

20 

55 

65 

67 

68 

69 

70 

71 

72 

74 

DEMAND REGION 

WATERLOO, IA 

WATERLOO, lA 

LA CROSSE, WI 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO 

JEFFERSON CITY, MD 

CHICAGO, IL 

CHICAGO, IL 

LASALLE, I L 

LASALLE, I L 

SPRINGFIELD. IL 

SPRINGFIELD, IL 

JEFFERSON CITY, MD 

PEORIA, IL 

CHICAGO, IL 

LASALLE, IL 

SPRINGFIELD, IL 

JEFFERSON CITY. MD 

DECATUR, AL 

DECATUR, AL 

MEMPHIS, TN 

JONESBORO, AR 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

PEORIA, IL 

CHICAGO, IL 

CHICAGO, IL 

DUBUQUE, IA 

DAVENPORT, lA 

ST. LOUIS, MO 

ST. LOUIS,· MO 

LASALLE, IL 

LASALLE, IL 

PADUCAH, I<Y 

PADUCAH, KY 

PADUCAH, KY 

MARION, IL 

MARION, IL 

MARION, Il 

SPRINGFIELD, IL 

SPRINGFIELD. IL 

SPRINGFIElD, IL 

EVANSVILLE, IN 

EVANSVILLE. IN 

LOUISVILLE, KY 

LOUISVILLE, KY 

CINCINNATI, OH 

WATERLOO, I A 

BOWLING GREEN, KY 

LA CROSSE, WI 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO 

JEFFERSON CITY, MD 

JEFFERSON CITY, MD 

CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD 

CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD 

CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD 

NASHVILLE, TN 

NASHVILLE, TN 

JACKSON, TN 

PEORIA, IL 

CHICAGO, IL 

ST. LOUIS, MD 

LASALLE, IL 

LASALLE, I.L 

SPRINGFIELD. IL 

SPRINGFIELD, IL 

SPRINGFIELD, IL 

EVANSVILLE, IN 

JEFFERSON CITY, MO 

BIRMINGHAM, AL 

MOBILE, AL 

DECATUR, AL 

LITTLE ROCK, AR 

MEMPHIS, TN 

JONESBORO, AR 

CHATTANOOGA, TN 

PEORIA, IL 

CHICAGO, IL 

DUBUQUE, IA 

DAVENPORT, IA 

ST. LOUIS, MO 

LASALLE, IL 

PADUCAH, KY 

MARION, IL 

LOADING DOCK 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 67 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 67 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 67 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 ILLI~OIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

ILLINOIS RIVER IN AQCR 71 

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 

GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 

ILLINOIS & MISSISSIPPI IN AQCR 75 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 

172 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

RATE 

(1985 $/TON) 

$4.32 

$5.17 

$5.83 

$3.88 

$4.85 

$6.13 

$3.05 

$4.62 

$3.29 

$4.39 

$4.45 

$6.00 

$6.13 

$5.55 

$6.15 

$4.81 

$3.20 

$4.52 

$8.67 

$10.94 

$7.34 

$5.55 

$6.85 

$10.71 

$11.41 

$6.51 

$11.30 

$8.99 

$7.80 

$3.60 

$8.18 

$5. 17 

$9.96 

$4.39 

$6.95 

$11.53 

$4.39 

$6.95 

$11.53 

$3.56 

$8.35 

$10.18 

$5.94 

$8.18 

$7.95 

$10.20 

$9.86 

$8.99 

$6.61 

$10.52 

$5.81 

$9.67 

$10.37 

$4.39 

$6.95 

$11.53 

$5.79 

$8.03 

$5.77 

$8.06 

$7.93 

$8.10 

$6.59 

$7.31 

$5.70 

$7.76 

$8.06 

$8.20 

$7.02 

$12.64 

$9.99 

$7.14 

$11.85 

$5.79 

$4.03 

$9.01 

$7.61 

$9.33 

$9.75 

$8.56 

$4.39 

$7.99 

$3.16 

$3.16 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK (1985 $/TON) 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.38 31 HARRISBURG, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.39 31 HARRISBURG, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.40 31 HARRISBURG, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.31 31 HARRISBURG, IL 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.40 31 HARRISBURG, IL 88 WATERLOO, lA CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.75 31 HARRISBURG, IL 93 CRESTON, lA CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.21 31 HARRISBURG, IL 94 KANSAS CITY, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.27 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 101 HAZARD, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $11.34 31 HARRISBURG, IL 102 LEXINGTON, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.84 31 HARRISBURG, IL 103 HUNTINGTON, WV CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $10.30 31 HARRISBURG, IL 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.40 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $5.09 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $11.28 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.53 31 HARRISBURG, IL 134 GREENVILLE, MS CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.93 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 135 TUPELO, MS CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $7.06 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.57 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $3. 16 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 179 PARKERSBURG, WV CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.40 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 207 KNOXVILLE, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $10.37 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.24 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 209 JACKSON, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.24 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 234 CHARLESTON, WV CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $10.79 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 77 EVANSVILLE, IN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $11.85 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $12.15 

33 MORGANFIELD,. KY 5 MOBILE, AL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $11.53 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 7 DECATUR, AL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.69 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 7 DECATUR, AL OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.68 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $7.34 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $9.35 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 20 JONESBORO, AR GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.58 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 20 JONESBORO, AR OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $7.57 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 20 JONESBORO, AR CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.32 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.56 

33 MORGANFIELD, KX 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12.57 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 65 PEORIA, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.16 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 65 PEORIA, IL OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $11.15 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 67 CHICAGO, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.88 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 68 DUBUQUE, IA GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $11.30 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 69 DAVENPORT, lA GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.11 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 69 DAVENPORT, lA OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12. 13 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.94 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $7.93 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.68 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 71 LASALLE, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.54 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 71 LASALLE, IL OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $11.55 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.79 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $6.97 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $11.45 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 74 MARION, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.79 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 74 MARION, IL OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $6.97 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 74 MARION, IL CUMBERLAND S OHIO IN AQCR 72 $11.45 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $7.93 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $9.94 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $3.24 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $5.43 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.68 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $3.41 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.85 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $4.77 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH GREEN & OHIO IN AOCR 77 $6.76 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $3.41 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.85 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 88 WATERLOO, lA GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $11.30 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.82 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 94 KANSAS CITY. MO OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $11.81 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 101 HAZARD, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $7.78 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 101 HAZARD, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.79 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $6.28 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 102 LEXINGTON, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.29 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 103 HUNTINGTON, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $6.76 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 103 HUNTINGTON, WV GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.76 

33 MORGANFIELD, KV 104 Ell ZABETHTOWN, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $3.41 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.85 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $3.54 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $5.55 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 134 GREENVILLE, MS GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.47 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 134 GREENVILLE, MS OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12.49 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 135 TUPELO, MS GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.61 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 135 TUPELO, MS OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.62 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.12 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.13 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.79 

Tables 173 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK (1985 $/TON) 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $6.97 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $11.45 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, WV OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $8.84 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 179 PARKERSBURG, WV GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.85 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 181 WHEELING, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $10.32 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 181 WHEELING, wv GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $12.34 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 197 PITTSBURGH, PA OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 ~11.21 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $11.91 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.79 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $7.80 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.53 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 209 JACKSON, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.79 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 209 JACKSON, TN OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $7.78 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 209 JACKSON, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $12.53 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $7.23 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.24 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 235 CLARKSBURG, wv OHIO RIVER IN AQCR 78 $12.23 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.99 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 1 DECATUR, AL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $7.14 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 1 DECATUR, AL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.69 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $5.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $7.34 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 20 JONESBORO, AR CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.03 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 20 JONESBORO, AR GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.58 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.01 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.56 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $7.61 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.16 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 67 CHICAGO, I.L CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.33 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 68 DUBUQUE, lA CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.75 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 69 DAVENPORT, lA CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.56 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 69 DAVENPORT, lA GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.11 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.39 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MD GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.94 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 71 LASALLE, IL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $7.99 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 71 LASALLE, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.54 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $3.16 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY CUMBERLAND RIVER IN AQCR 208 $10.20 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 74 MARION, IL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $3.16 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 74 MARION, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 74 MARION, IL CUMBERLAND RIVER IN AQCR 208 $10.20 

34 MADiSONVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.38 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $7.93 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 17 EVANSVILLE, IN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $3.24 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.39 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.85 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.40 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $6.76 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.31 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.85 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.40 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 88 WATERLOO, lA CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.75 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.27 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 94 KANSAS CITY, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.82 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 101 HAZARD, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.29 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $9.84 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.76 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $10.30 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 104 ELl Z AB ETHTOWN, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.85 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.40 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $3.54 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $5.09 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 134 GREENVILLE, MS CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $8.93 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 134 GREENVILLE, MS GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $10.47 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 135 TUPELO, MS CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $7.06 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 135 TUPELO, MS GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.61 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $6.57 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $8.12 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $3.16 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $4.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 138 CA,PE GIRARDEAU, MO CUMBERLAND RIVER IN AQCR 208 $10.20 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $10.37 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.24 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN CUMBERLAND RIVER IN AQCR 208 $10.13 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 209 JACKSON, TN CUMBERLAND & OHIO IN AQCR 72 $4.24 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 209 JACKSON, TN GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $5.79 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 234 CHARLESTON, wv GREEN & OHIO IN AQCR 77 $9.24 

37 MARSHALL, TX 19 MONROE, LA OUACHITA RIVER IN AQCR 19 $10.79 

43 POTEAU, OK 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AQCR 21 $4.58 

43 POTEAU, OK 16 LITTLE ROCK, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AQCR 17 $5.53 

43 POTEAU, OK 17 FT. SMITH, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AQCR 17 $3.14 

174 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK ( 1985 $/TON) 

43 POTEAU, OK 17 FT. SMITH, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $3.99 

43 POTEAU, OK 17 FT. SMITH, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $10.30 

43 POTEAU, OK 18 MEMPHIS, TN ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $9.07 

43 POTEAU, OK 18 MEMPHIS, TN ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 17 $10.03 

43 POTEAU, OK 19 MONROE, LA ARKANSAS RIVER IN AQCR 21 $10.52 

43 POTEAU, OK 19 MONROE, LA ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 17 $11.47 

43 POTEAU, OK 20 JONESBORO, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $10.83 

43 POTEAU, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $3.03 

43 POTEAU, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 17 $3.79 

43 POTEAU, OK 21 CLARKSVILLE, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $11.26 

43 POTEAU, OK 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $10.43 

43 POTEAU, OK 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 17 $11.38 

43 POTEAU, OK 186 TULSA, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 17 $4.22 

43 POTEAU, OK 186 TULSA, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $5.05 

43 POTEAU, OK 186 TULSA, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $9.24 

43 POTEAU, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 17 $3.14 

43 POTEAU, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 21 $3.99 

43 POTEAU, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $10.30 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 17 FT. SMITH, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $4.16 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 186 TULSA, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $3.10 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 188 MCALESTER, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $4.16 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 17 FT. SMITH, AR ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $9.03 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 186 TULSA, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $7.97 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 188 MCALESTER, OK ARKANSAS RIVER IN AOCR 186 $9.03 

49 MACON, MO 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 65 $3.03 

49 MACON, MO 65 PEORIA, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AOCR 137 $4.20 

49 MACON, MO 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 65 $5.17 

49 MACON, MO 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 65 $4.01 

49 MACON, MO 69 DAVENPORT, lA MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AOCR 137 $5. 17 

49 MACON, MO 70 ST. LOUIS, MO MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AOCR 137 $5.05 

49 MACON, MO 70 ST. LOUIS, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $5.96 

49 MACON, MO 70 ST. LOUIS, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $6.06 

49 MACON, MO 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $5.75 

49 MACON, MO 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $5.91 

49 MACON, MO 88 WATERLOO, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $5.17 

49 MACON, MO 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $3.18 

49 MACON, MO 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $3.88 

56 ALBIA, lA 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $3.03 

56 ALBIA, IA 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $3.82 

56 ALBIA, IA 68 DUBUQUE, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $4.32 

56 ALBIA, lA 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $5.17 

56 ALBIA, lA 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $3.14 

56 ALBIA, IA 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $4.01 

56 ALBIA, IA 88 WATERLOO, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $4.32 

56 ALBIA, IA 88 WATERLOO, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $5.17 

56 ALBIA, lA 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 65 $3.88 

56 ALBIA, lA 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $4.85 

62 GUNNISON, co 20 JONESBORO, AR UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $26.84 

62 GUNNISON, co 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $28.13 

62 GUNNISON, co 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $27.79 

62 GUNNISON, co 70 ST. LOUIS, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $24.89 

62 GUNNISON, co 71 LASALLE, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $26.46 

62 GUNNISON, co 74 MARION, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.67 

62 GUNNISON, co 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $24.85 

62 GUNNISON, co 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $27.09 

62 GUNNISON, co 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.67 

62 GUNNISON, co 208 NASHVILLE, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $27.07 

62 GUNNISON, co 209 JACKSON, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $27.05 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVE~ IN AQCR 128 $21 .22 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $25.27 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $25.99 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTV, WY 65 PEORIA, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $28.94 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 131 $29.28 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $31.10 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 128 $28.11 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 70 $30.76 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AOCR 69 $32.16 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $32.88 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $33.43 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $36.00 

70 PRICE, UT 79 CINCINNATI, OH UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $34.51 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $28.81 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $30.06 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $31.97 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $32.71 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $33.14 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $37.08 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTV, co 5 MOBILE, AL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.33 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 7 DECATUR, AL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $28.49 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 18 MEMPHIS, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $27. 16 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 20 JONESBORO, AR UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.38 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $30.38 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $26.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $26.33 

Tables 175 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG H SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK (1985 $/TON) 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $28.81 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $27.62 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 70 ST. LOUIS, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $23.43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 71 LASALLE, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $24.99 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 72 PADUCAH, KY UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $24.21 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 74 MARION, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $24.21 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $23.38 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 77 EVANSVILLE, IN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.76 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 78 LOUISVILLE, KY UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $27.77 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 79 CINCINNATI, OH UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $29.68 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $2'1. 77 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $28.81 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 102 LEXINGTON, KY UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.19 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 103 HUNTINGTON, WV UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.67 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $27.77 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $26.44 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $30.34 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.59 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 134 GREENVILLE, MS UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $30.29 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 135 TUPELO, MS UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $28.43 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 137 .JEFFERSON CITY, MD UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.63 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $24.21 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 207 KNOXVILLE, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.72 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 208 NASHVILLE, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.61 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 209 .JACKSON, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $25.59 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 18 MEMPHIS, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $25.38 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 20 .JONESBORO, AR UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $23.60 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $17.66 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $24.97 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $25.55 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $26.42 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $29.79 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.95 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $24.55 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $31.61 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $31.86 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $32.44 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $33. 14 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $34.28 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $15.52 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUC'IJE, JA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $23.70 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $24.27 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $25.48 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, IA MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $31.95 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $34.09 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $16.71 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $24.30 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $24.59 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 70 ST. LOUIS, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $20.88 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 71 LASALLE, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $23.21 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 74 MARION, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $22.43 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $21.60 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 77 EVANSVILLE, IN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $23.98 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $15.52 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $23.70 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $24.27 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $24.66 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $14.46 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE. WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $22.75 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $25.23 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $26.99 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $33.45 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $35.62 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $15.71 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIV~R IN AQCR 131 $21.50 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $26.48 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $28.26 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN MISSISSIPPI & MISSOURI IN AQCR 137 $34.73 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 70 $36.87 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 137 .JEFFERSON CITY, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.70 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $22.43 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 208 NASHVILLE, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $23.83 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 209 .JACKSON, TN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $23.81 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $20.29 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $24.34 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $25.06 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.15 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $23.21 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 68 DUBUQUE, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $24.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $19.33 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $23.66 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $24.10 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 70 ST. LOUIS, MD UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $23.51 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 74 MARION, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $25-.06 

176 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table F7. Transport rates for coal shipments by combination rail/barge or by barge-Continued 

SUP OEM RATE 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION LOADING DOCK (1985 $/TON) 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $24.23 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.15 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $23.21 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $24.85 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $17.09 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $24.66 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $24.74 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.34 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $23.40 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $21.33 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $25.38 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO UPPER Ml'iSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $25.06 

97 FORT UNION, MT 65 PEORIA, IL UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $17.98 

97 FORT UNION, MT 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $15.84 

97 FORT UNION, MT 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $17.02 

97 FORT UNION, MT 88 WATERLOO, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $15.84 

97 FORT UNION, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $14.78 

97 FORT UNION, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $16.03 

97 FORT UNION, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 131 $17.91 

97 FORT UNION, MT 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $19.02 

98 FORT UNION, NO 68 DUBUQUE, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $17.94 

98 FORT UNION, NO 68 DUBUQUE, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.51 

98 FORT UNION, NO 69 DAVENPORT, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 69 $18.70 

98 FORT UNION, NO 69 DAVENPORT, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $18.83 

98 FORT UNION, NO 88 WATERLOO, lA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 68 $17.94 

98 FORT UNION, NO 88 WATERLOO, IA UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.51 

98 FORT UNION, NO 128 LA CROSSE, WI UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $17.45 

98 FORT UNION, NO 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN AQCR 128 $18.70 

Tables 177 
Table F8. Equivalent transport 

mouth power plants 

rates for coal shipments-transmission from mine 

SUP OEM RATE REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION ( 1985 $/TON) 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL $9.23 3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7 DECATUR, AL $9.23 8 LEBANON, VA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN $9.52 8 LEBANON, VA 226 ROANOKE, VA $9.52 12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv $8.60 13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.11 13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $8. 11 13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 182 CHILLICOTHE, OH $8.11 14 CADIZ, OH 175 MANSFIELD, OH $8.54 14 CADIZ, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH $8.54 14 CADIZ, OH 181 WHEELING, wv $8.54 14 CADIZ, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH $8.54 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv $9.20 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 181 WHEELING, wv $9.20 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $9.20 16 PITTSBURGH, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv $9.20 

17 KITTANNING, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA $9.41 17 KITTANNING, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.41 

17 KITTANNING, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA $9.41 

20 SOMERSET, PA 113 HAGERSTOWN, MD $9.46 

20 SOMERSET, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA $9.46 

20 SOMERSET, PA 232 GASSAWAY, wv $9.46 

20 SOMERSET, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv $9.46 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $7.39 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 74 MARION, IL $7.39 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL $7.39 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO $8.01 29 MT. VERNON, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY $8.01 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 74 MARION, IL $8.01 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL $7.74 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $7.74 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $8.01 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN $8.01 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $8.27 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN $8.27 33 MORGANFIELD, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $8.27 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY $8.55 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN $8.55 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 104 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY $8.55 34 MADISONVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY $8.55 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $4.34 38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $4.34 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA $4.90 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 106 NEW ORLEANS, LA $4.90 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX $4.90 39 FAIRFIELD, TX 216 HOUSTON, TX $4.90 48 CLINTON, MO 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $8.14 48 CLINTON, MO 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO $8.14 48 CLINTON, MO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO $8.14 51 MOUND CITY, KS 94 KANSAS CITY, MO $7.33 51 MOUND CITY, KS 95 SALINA, KS $7.33 51 MOUND CITY, KS 96 TOPEKA, KS $7.33 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 98 WICHITA, KS $7.33 51 MOUND CITY, KS 99 PITTSBURG, KS $7.33 

62 GUNNISON, CO 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $8.19 62 GUNNISON, co 35 GRAND JUNCTION, co $8.19 

62 GUNNISON, co 38 PUEBLO, CO $8.19 68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $7.60 

70 PRICE, UT 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $8.67 70 PRICE, UT 219 MORGAN, UT $8.67 

80 MINOT, NO 172 BISMARK, NO $4.55 87 CENTRALIA. WA 193 PORTLAND, OR $7.56 87 CENTRALIA. WA 228 OLYMPIA. WA $7.56 87 CENTRALIA. WA 229 SEATTLE, WA $7.56 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ $6.75 93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTY, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO $7.49 94 SWEETWATER CTY, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY $6.71 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 140 BILLINGS, MT $6.44 95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT $6.44 96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 241 CASPER, WY $5.88 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS. WY $5.88 98 FORT UNION, NO 172 BISMARK, NO $4.55 98 FORT UNION, NO 206 PIERRE. so $4.55 

178 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table Gl. Sulfur and Btu quality restrictions for coal shipped to metallurgic and export markets 

A. Years Prior to 2030 

Eastern and Midwestern Coal Supply Regions 

o Sulfur conteot by weight not greater than 1.8% 

o Btu content of 13000 btu/lb or greater. 

Western Coal Supply Regions 

o Only 4 regions allowed as suppliers: 

Raton, NM Supply Region 61 

Gunnison, CO Supply Region 62 

Price, VT Supply Region 70 

McKinley Cty, NM Supply Region 91 

o Sulfur content by weight not greater than 1.8% 

B. Years After 2030 

Eastern and Midwestern Coal Supply Regions 

o Sulfur content by weight not greater than 2.0% 

o Btu content of 12000 btu/lb or greater 

Western Coal Supply Regions 

o Only 4 region allowed as supplies (see above) 

o Sulfur content by weight not greater than 2.0% 

Tables 179 
Table Hl. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination 

(LBS OF SOX PER MILLION BTU HEAT INPUT) 

SUP OEM 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 1 JACKSON, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 3 GADSDEN, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 5 MOBILE, AL 4.83 4.82 4.82 4.80 4.80 4.80 

3 BIRMINGHAM, AL 56 ATLANTA, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

4 JASPER, TN 3 GADSDEN, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 

4 JASPER, TN 7 DECATUR, AL 1.06 1.03 1.02 0.97 0.97 

4 JASPER, TN 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 5 MOBILE, AL 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 54 MACON, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 56 ATLANTA, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 58 SAVANNAH, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 102 LEXINGTON, KY 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 166 RALEIGH, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 167 CHARLOTTE, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 170 WILMINGTON, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 171 ASHEVILLE, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 204 GEORGETOWN, sc 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 207. KNOXVILLE, TN 2.92 2.92 2.S2 2.95 

7 OAK RIDGE, TN 208 NASHVILLE, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

8 LEBANON, VA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

8 LEBANON, VA 58 SAVANNAH, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

8 LEBANON, VA 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

8 LEBANON, VA 223 NORFOLK, VA 2.38 2.41 2.41 2.58 2.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL 2.24 2.27 2.28 2.31 2.34 2.35 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL 1.06 1.03 1.02 0.93 0.90 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 43 NEW YORK, NY 1.11 1. 11 1.11 1.11 1.12 

9 PIKEVILLE. KY 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 46 DOVER, DE 3.58 3.50 3.44 3.36 3.23 3.23 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 47 WASHINGTON, DC 1.52 1.52 1. 52 1. 52 1. 52 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL 2.51 2.55 2.62 2. 77 3.38 6.50 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 54 MACON, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 58 SAVANNAH, GA 3.89 3.88 3.86 3.80 3.76 3.38 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 59 A,LBANY, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 65 PEORIA, IL 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 68 DUBUQUE, lA 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MD 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.22 5.23 5.23 5.19 5.20 4.36 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY 5.45 5.57 5.65 5.77 5.96 6.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 3.97 3.91 3.86 3.80 3.65 5.12 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 119 BOSTON, MA 2.50 2.49 2.47 2.45 2.42 2.42 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 120 PROVIDENCE, RI 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 2.73 2.65 2.53 2.32 2.05 1.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 123 DETROIT, Ml 1. 59 1.60 1.61 1.62 1.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH 1.66 1.66 1.65 1.64 1.62 1.60 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI 1. 67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1. 67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 126 MARQUETTE, Ml 1. 67 1.67 1.67 1 .67 1.67 1.67 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 136 GREENSBORO, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 165 HICKORY, NC 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.27 2.27 2.26 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE. KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 170 WILMINGTON, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 171 ASHEVILLE. NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 173 DAYTON, OH 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 174 CLEVELAND. OH 2.25 2.36 2.56 2.72 4.54 5.17 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv 3.71 3.81 3.92 3.98 4.35 4.46 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc 2.31 2.31 2.31 2.31 2.31 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc 2.97 2.91 2.85 2.81 2.53 2.20 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 3.66 3.71 3.74 3.82 4.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN 3.78 3.91 4.02 4.44 5.00 5.00 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 223 NORFOLK, VA 2.49 2.52 2.54 2.62 2.64 2.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 225 RICHMOND, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 226 ROANOKE, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

9 PIKEVILLE, KY 235 CLARKSBURG, wv 3.10 3.10 3.10 3.10 3.10 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 1 JACKSON, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 47 WASHINGTON, DC 1. 52 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.52 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 52 TAMPA, FL 4.78 4.96 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 53 AUGUSTA, GA 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 54 MACON, GA 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 58 SAVANNAH, GA 3.82 3.81 3.79 3.73 3.68 3.37 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 59 ALBANY, GA 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 

180 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table Hl. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination-Continued 

(LBS OF sox PER MILLION BTU HEAT INPUT) 

SUP OEM 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG H DEMAND REGION 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 6.90 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 3.16 3.16 3.16 3.16 3.16 3.16 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH 1.59 1. 59 1.61 1.63 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 125 KALAMAZOO, MI 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 162 BUFFALO, NY 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 165 HICKORY, NC 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.27 2.26 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 167 CHARLOTTE, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 199 CHARLESTON, sc 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 200 COLUMBIA, sc 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 204 GEORGETOWN, sc 2.63 2.58 2.53 2.47 2.35 2.20 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 2.83 2.83 2.83 2.84 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 223 NORFOLK, VA 2.62 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.64 2.64 

10 MIDDLESBORO, KY 225 RICHMOND, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL 2.10 2. 10 2.10 2.10 2.10 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY 5.26 5.39 5.51 5.64 5.93 6.00 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 

11 BEATTYVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.86 5.90 5.88 5.91 5.71 5.50 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 102 LEXINGTON, KY 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 

i2 SALYERSVILLE, KY 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 5.61 5.59 5.58 5.60 5.57 5.99 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 2.41 2.12 2.01 1. 87 1. 70 1 .67 

t2 SALYERSVILLE, KY 124 TOLEDO, OH 1.55 1.56 1.58 1.61 

t2 SALYERSVILLE, KY 166 RALEIGH, NC 2.41 2.41 2.41 2.41 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 181 WHEELING, wv 3.96 4.03 4.08 4.03 4.13 2.43 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 202 SPARTANBURG, sc 2.41 2.41 2.41 2.41 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN 3. 70 3.82 3.92 4.36 5.00 5.00 

12 SALYERSVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 5 MOBILE, AL 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.83 5.97 5.91 6.16 5.69 5.50 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 103 HUNT! NGTON, wv 7.29 7.27 7.26 7.25 7.24 7.33 

13 p_LEASANTVILLE, OH 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 5.08 5.08 5.08 5.08 5.08 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv 6.44 6.37 6.37 6.06 6.34 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 1St WHEELING, wv 6.99 6.50 6.00 5.05 4.01 4.01 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH 4.01 4.01 4.01 4.01 4.01 4.01 

13 PLEASANTVILLE, OH 208 NASHVILLE, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 14 CADIZ, OH 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 14 CADIZ, OH 124 TOLEDO, OH 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 14 CADIZ, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH 5.01 5.03 5.05 5.05 5.05 5.05 14 CADIZ, OH 176 COLUMBUS, OH 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 14 CADIZ, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA 5.70 5.70 5.70 5.70 14 CADIZ, OH 179 PARKERSBURG, wv .6.48 6.48 6.48 6.48 6.48 14 CADIZ, OH 181 WHEELING, wv- 7.07 6.70 6.33 5.31 4.09 3.81 14 CADIZ, OH 183 ZANESVILLE, OH 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 150 ATLANTIC CITY, Nv 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 164 OLEAN, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 174 CLEVELAND, OH 3.83 3.87 3.92 4.22 5.20 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 178 DUBOIS, PA 4.91 4.84 4.86 3.80 3.80 

15 YOUNGSTOWN, OH 181 WHEELING, wv 5.31 5.05 4.76 4.40 4.35 4.46 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 5 MOBILE, AL 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 7 DECATUR, AL 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.72 3.73 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.69 5.70 5.69 5.64 5.59 5.50 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 8.05 7.98 7.90 7.78 6.23 7.12 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 115 BALTIMORE, MD 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 119 BOSTON, MA 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 120 PROVIDENCE, RI 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 121 MANCHESTER, NH 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 124 TOLEDO, OH 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 129 DULUTH, MN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA 3.40 3.42 3.42 3.65 3.70 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 164 OLEAN, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 174 CLEVELAND, OH 5.46 5.48 5.51 5.52 5.54 5.54 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 176 COLUMBUS, OH 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA 7.89 8.11 8.10 7.76 2.80 

Tables 181 
Table Hl. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination-Continued 

(LBS OF SOX PER MILLION BTU HEAT INPUT) 

SUP OEM 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 181 WHEELING, wv 5.90 5.82 5.75 5.57 5.45 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 183 ZANESVILLE, OH 3.81 3.67 3.49 3.20 2.97 2.76 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA 2.88 2.99 3.09 3.19 3.37 3.39 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 208 NASHVILLE, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

16 PITTSBURGH, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv 3.42 3.49 3.55 3.69 4.07 5. 12 

17 KITTANNING, PA 42 HARTFORD, CT 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 

17 KITTANNING, PA 43 NEW YORK, NY 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 

17 KITTANNING, PA 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 

17 KITTANNING, PA 46 DOVER, DE 3.58 3.50 3.44 3.36 3.23 3.23 

17 KITTANNING, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

17 KITTANNING, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

17 KITTANNING, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

17 KITTANNING, PA 123 DETROIT, MI 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 

17 KITTANNING, PA 129 DULUTH, MN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

17 KITTANNING, PA 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 

17 KITTANNING, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA 3.64 3.66 3.67 3.69 3.70 3.70 

17 KITTANNING, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

17 KITTANNING, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 

17 KITTANNING, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

17 KITTANNING, PA 164 OLEAN, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

17 KITTANNING, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA 3.65 3.63 3.63 3.44 3.37 

17 KITTANNING, PA 179 PARKERSBURG, wv 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 2.97 

17 KITTANNING, PA 181 WHEELING, wv 3.71 3.81 3.92 3.98 4.35 4.46 

17 KITTANNING, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

17 KITTANNING, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3. 70 

17 KITTANNING, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

17 KITTANNING, PA 237 GREEN BAY, WI 5.58 5.58 5.58 5.58 5.58 

17 KITTANNING, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 

18 SHARON, PA 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

18 SHARON, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

18 SHARON, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.06 

18 SHARON, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

18 SHARON, PA 164 OLEAN, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

18 SHARON, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA 6.81 6.89 6.69 3.75 3.06 

18 SHARON, PA 239 MILWAUKEE, WI 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 160 ROCHESTER, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 162 BUFFALO, NY 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 163 BINGHAMTON, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 164 OLEAN, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

1~ STATE COLLEGE, PA 196 HARRISBURG, PA 3. 70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

19 STATE COLLEGE, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

20 SOMERSET, PA 47 WASHINGTON, DC 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

20 SOMERSET, PA 116 BRANDYWINE, MD 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

20 SOMERSET, PA 151 SCRANTON, PA 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

20 SOMERSET, PA 178 DUBOIS, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

20 SOMERSET, PA 195 ALTOONA, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

20 SOMERSET, PA 197 PITTSBURGH, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

20 SOMERSET, PA 231 ELKINS, wv 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 

20 SOMERSET, PA 233 MARTINSBURG, wv 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 

20 SOMERSET, PA 235 CLARKSBURG, wv 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 43 NEW YORK, NY 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 1.56 1.56 1.55 1. 55 1.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 46 DOVER, DE 3.58 3.50 3.44 3.36 3.23 3.23 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 47 WASHINGTON, DC 1. 52 1. 52 1.52 1.52 1.52 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 52 TAMPA, FL 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 58 SAVANNAH, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 72 PADUCAH, KY 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.32 5.39 5.35 5.43 5.22 5.19 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.21 5.03 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 115 BALTIMORE, MD 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 119 BOSTON, MA 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 123 DETROIT, MI 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.67 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 124 TOLEDO, OH 1.61 1.61 1.61 1.61 1.60 1.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 126 MARQUETTE, MI 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 136 GREENSBORO, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 1.66 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 160 ROCHESTER, NY 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 166 RALEIGH, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 167 CHARLOTTE, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 170 WILMINGTON, NC 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 173 DAYTON, OH 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 174 CLEVELAND, DH 3.06 3.24 3.51 3.72 5.14 5.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 181 WHEELING, wv 4.56 4.51 4.41 4.13 3.81 2.16 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 204 GEORGETOWN, sc 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA 2.44 2.47 2.48 2.60 2.64 2.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

182 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table Hl. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination-Continued 

(LBS OF SOX PER MILLION BTU HEAT INPUT) 

SUP OEM 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

REG II SUPPLY REGION REG II DEMAND REGION 

21 CHARLESTON, wv 234 CHARLESTON, wv 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 45 PHI LADEPHIA, PA 2.48 2.48 2.48 2.48 2.48 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.30 5.38 5.43 5.45 5.49 5.50 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.20 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, wv 2.58 2.57 2.56 2.55 2.55 

22 CLARKSBURG, wv 235 CLARKSBURG, wv 5.12 5.12 5.12 5.12 5.12 5.12 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 42 HARTFORD, CT 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 43 NEW YORK, NY 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.40 1.44 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 46 DOVER, DE 3.58 3.50 3.44 3.36 3.23 3.23 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 103 HUNTINGTON, wv 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 115 SAL TIMORE, MD 3.29 3.27 3.23 3.22 2.05 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 119 BOSTON, MA 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 120 PROVIDENCE, RI 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 2.42 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 151 SCRANTON, PA 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.43 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 162 BUFFALO, NY 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 179 PARKERSBURG, _WV 2.58 2.57 2.56 2.55 2.55 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 181 WHEELING, wv 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 223 NORFOLK, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

23 PHILIPPI, wv 225 RICHMOND, VA 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.64 

26 PEORIA, IL 69 DAVENPORT, IA 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

26 PEORIA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 

26 PEORIA, IL 88 WATERLOO, IA 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

26 PEORIA, IL 92 DES MOINES, IA 5.37 5.37 5.37 5.37 5.37 

27 OTTAWA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 65 PEORIA, IL 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

28 TAYLORVILLE, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 7.04 7.01 6.96 6.88 6.61 6.50 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 7 DECATUR, AL 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 52 TAMPA, FL 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 56 ATLANTA, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 65 PEORIA, IL 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 68 DUBUQUE, IA 6.56 6.55 6.56 6.13 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 69 DAVENPORT, IA 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO 4.48 4.50 4.49 4.44 4.44 3.84 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 71 LASALLE, IL 5.77 5.77 5.77 5.77 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY 3.61 3.61 3.61 3.61 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 74 MARION, IL 7.53 7.73 7.75 8.70 10.70 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.67 5.67 5.67 5.67 5.67 5.67 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 82 SOUTH BEND; IN 5.19 5.23 5.24 5.28 5.30 5.30 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 88 WATERLOO, IA 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 94 KANSAS CITY, MO 6.11 6.15 6.13 6.06 5.12 3.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 6.70 6.70 6.70 6.70 6. 70 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN 3.49 3.53 3.57 4.02 5.·00 5.00 

29 MT. VERNON, IL 239 MILWAUKEE, WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 66 DANVILLE, IL 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 67 CHICAGO, IL 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 82 SOUTH BEND, IN 5.19 5.23 5.24 5.28 5.30 5.30 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 5.81 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.82 5.83 

30 TUSCOLA, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 5 MOBILE, AL 5.78 5.78 5.78 5.78 5.78 5.80 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 7 DECATUR, AL 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 18 MEMPHIS, TN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 68 DUBUQUE, IA 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 70 ST. LOUIS, MO 4.52 4.53 4.53 4.49 4.48 3.45 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 71 LASALLE, IL 5.77 5.77 5.77 5.77 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 72 PADUCAH, KY 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.30 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 74 MARION, IL 10.70 10.70 10.70 10.70 10.70 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 78 LOUISVILLE, KY 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 79 CINCINNATI, OH 6.13 6.44 6.44 7.82 8.30 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 128 LA CROSSE, WI 2.98 3.00 3.02 3.01 3. 15 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 208 NASHVILLE, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

31 HARRISBURG, IL 239 MILWAUKEE .. WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 66 DANVILLE, IL 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 74 MARION, IL 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.10 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.31 5.28 5.25 5.21 5.18 5.10 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 78 LOUISVILLE, KY 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 5.44 5.44 5.45 5.48 5.51 5.52 

Tables 183 
Table Hl. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination-Continued 

(LBS OF sox PER MILLION BTU HEAT INPUT) 

SUP OEM 1988 1993 1998 2005 .-o15 2025 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 82 SOUTH BEND, IN 5.19 5.23 5.24 5.28 f.30 5.30 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 6.47 6.47 6.31 6.52 4.;71 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 122 GRANO RAPIDS, MI 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.94 :;'.94 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.98 2.00 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 237 GREEN BAY, WI 5.58 5.58 5.58 5.58 f.58 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 238 WAUSAU', WI 4.65 4.65 4.65 4.65 4.65 

32 SULLIVAN, IN 240 MADISON, WI 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 5 MOBILE, AL 5.74 5.71 5.69 5.63 f.62 5.65 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 7 DECATUR, AL 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 2.39 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 f.OO 5.00 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 65 PEORIA, IL 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 ~.00 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 68 DUBUQUE, IA 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 ~.99; 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 69 DAVENPORT, IA 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 ~.00 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 70 ST. LOUIS, MD 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 2.39 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 1'.90 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.64 5.63 5.61 5.57 f.53 5.19 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY 5.91 5.87 5.83 5.77 2.90 3.39 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.83 5.91 5.86 6.03 ~.78 5.54 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 80 INDIANA POLlS, IN 5.70 5.64 5.58 5.42 ~.30 5.30 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 7.52 7.52 7.52 7.52 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 88 WATERLOO, lA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

33 MORGANFIELD, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN 4.91 4.93 4.95 4.98 ~-00 5.00 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 5 MOBILE, AL 5.14 5.09 5.05 4.94 4.89 4.80 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 7 DECATUR, AL 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 2.28 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 18 MEMPHIS, TN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 52 TAMPA, FL 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 ~.50 6.50 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 f.OO 5.00 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 56 ATLANTA, GA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 f.OO 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 68 DUBUQUE, IA 9.96 9.97 9.97 9.98 ~.99 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 72 PADUCAH, KY 3.29 3.50 3.78 4.10 f.32 5.70 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90 i'. 90 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 77 EVANSVILLE, IN 5.20 5.20 5.20 5.20 f.20 5.20 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 78 LOUISVILLE, KY 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 2.28 3.28 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 79 CINCINNATI, OH 5.88 6.05 5.99 6.39 f.72 5.50 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 7.52 7.52 7.52 7.52 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28 2.28 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 208 NASHVILLE, TN 4.78 4.80 4.82 4.90 f.OO 5.00 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 237 GREEN BAY, WI 5.58 5.58 5.58 5.58 f.58 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 238 WAUSAU, WI 4.65 4.65 4.65 4.65 4.65 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 239 MILWAUKEE, WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

34 MADISONVILLE, KY 240 MADISON, WI 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 

38 MT. PLEASANT, TX 22 SHREVEPORT, LA 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 :3.00 3.00 

39 FAIRFIELD, TX 212 AUSTIN, TX 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 :3.00 3.00 

43 POTEAU, OK 5 MOBILE, AL 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 

43 POTEAU, OK 94 KANSAS CITY, MO 6.19 6.17 6.13 6.10 6. 10 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 52 TAMPA, FL 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 6.50 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 68 DUBUQUE, IA 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 94 KANSAS CITY, MO 6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 98 WICHITA, KS 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD 11.00 10.87 10.70 10.54 9.51 9.20 

46 MUSKOGEE, OK 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 94 KANSAS CITY, MO 7.20 7.21 7.21 7.21 7.24 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 98 WICHITA, KS 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 

47 PITTSBURGH, KS 139 SPRINGFIELD, MD 11.77 11.79 11.82 11.83 11.87 11.88 

48 CLINTON, MO 98 WICHITA, KS 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 

48 CLINTON, MO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO 12.90 12.90 12.90 12.90 12.90 

49 MACON, MO 88 WATERLOO, IA 6.60 6.60 6.60 6.60 6.60 

49 MACON, MD 94 KANSAS CITY, MO 6.60 6.60 6.60 6.60 6.60 

49 MACON, MO 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 7.93 7.94 7.95 7.95 7.99 

49 MACON, MO 139 SPRINGFIELD, MO 12.90 12.90 12.90 12.90 12.90 

51 MOUND CITY, KS 98 WICHITA, KS 9.38 9.38 9.38 9.38 9.38 9.38 

56 ALBIA, IA 88 WATERLOO, IA 6.69 6.69 6.69 6.69 6.69 

56 ALBIA, IA 92 DES MOINES, lA 6.69 6.69 6.69 6.69 6.69 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 13 LAS VEGAS, NV 1. 67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

57 WINSLOW, AZ 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

62 GUNNISON, co 36 DENVER, co 1.20 1.20 1. 20 1.20 1.20 

62 GUNNISON, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO 1.20 1.20 1. 20 1.20 1. 20 

62 GUNNISON, co 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

66 RAWLINS, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 65 PEORIA, IL 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

67 SHERIDAN & JOHNSON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL 1. 77 1.77 1. 77 1. 77 1. 79 

68 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 

70 PRICE, UT 13 LAS VEGAS, NV 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 

70 PRICE, UT 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1. 20 1.20 

70 PRICE, UT 79 CINCINNATI, OH 6.13 6.44 6.44 7.82 8.30 

70 PRICE, UT 220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 

87 CENTRALIA, WA 193 PORTLAND, OR 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90 

90 SAN JUAN CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 

91 MCKINLEY CTY, NM 14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 67 CHICAGO, IL 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 86 SIOUX CITY, IA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

92 CARBON CTY, WY 95 SALINA, KS 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

184 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table H1. SIP standards, according to supply origin and demand destination-Continued 

(LBS OF sox PER MILLION BTU HEAT INPUT) 

SUP OEM 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

REG # SUPPLY REGION REG # DEMAND REGION 

92 CARBON CTV, WY 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTV, co 36 DENVER, co 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTV, co 38 PUEBLO, co 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTV, co 40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CD 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTV, co 70 ST. LOUIS, MO 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 

93 MOFFAT & ROUTT CTV, co 85 OMAHA, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

94 SWEETWATER CTV, wv 67 CHICAGO, IL 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 

94 SWEETWATER CTV, wv 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

94 SWEETWATER CTY, wv 243 ROCK SPRINGS, wv 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 65 PEORIA, IL 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 67 CHICAGO, IL 1.39 1. 39 1.40 1.40 1.70 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 68 DUBUQUE, [A 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 123 DETROIT, MI 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 124 TOLEDO, OH 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 126 MARQUETTE, MI 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1. 67 1.67 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 128 LA CROSSE, WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 129 DULUTH, MN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 2.70 2.70 2.71 2.72 2.70 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT 1.44 1.42 1. 38 1.34 1. 32 1.20 

95 POWDER RIVER BASIN, MT 240 MADISON, WI 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 38 PUEBLO, co 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 70 ST. LOUIS, MO 4.68 4.67 4.64 4.56 3.98 2.30 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 73 ROCKFORD, IL 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 85 OMAHA, NE 2.98 2.91 2.88 2.74 2.50 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 86 SIOUX CITY, lA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 88 WATERLOO, lA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 92 DES MOINES, lA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 94 KANSAS CITY, MD 6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 98 WICHITA, KS 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 128 LA CROS.SE, WI 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 9.99 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 129 DULUTH, MN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 2.75 2.74 2.74 2.73 2.70 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, WY 238 WAUSAU, WI 4.65 4.65 4.65 4.65 4.65 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 240 MADISON, WI 1.20 1. 20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 

96 POWDER RIVER BASIN, wv 241 CASPER, wv 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

97 FORT UNION, MT 143 MILES CITY, MT 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 

98 FORT UNION, NO 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 

98 FORT UNION, NO 172 BISMARK, NO 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

98 FORT UNION, NO 206 PIERRE, so 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 

Tables 185 
Table H2. NSPS discharge limits by demand region 

(TONS OF SOX PER YEAR) 

OEM 

REG # DEMAND REGION 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

1 JACKSON, AL 2201 2931 3405 6927 6832 14489 

3 GADSDEN, AL 961 1451 2556 6350 5549 9824 

4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 52997 62774 67579 95567 54395 58599 

5 MOBILE, AL 1617 2797 3654 8181 8797 16035 

7 DECATUR, AL 1660 2213 851 5206 5485 8761 

13 LAS VEGAS, NV 24573 29352 28882 2851 24252 16221 

14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 37477 41120 39105 37692 98242 54082 

15 PHOENIX, AZ 3912 6129 26581 8852 48449 60994 

16 • LITTLE ROCK, AR 3090 2952 6702 5318 21888 27331 

17 FT. SMITH, AR 23399 23037 21838 8133 18315 12446 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 656 989 1217 887 3042 5021 

19 MONROE, LA 2805 4105 6395 5252 20460 25255 

20 JONESBORO, AI< 30831 28428 10816 20090 22656 14434 

22 SHREVEPORT, LA 50288 56739 57611 57545 52188 46404 

24 LOS ANGELES, CA 1285 12802 11266 14084 19559 21587 

28 SACRAMENTO, CA 1104 1032 104 135 1651 1910 

29 SAN DIEGO, CA 695 661 66 87 1057 149 

30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 4096 350 384 502 1667 2532 

31 FRESNO, CA 245 262 259 279 2525 2920 

36 DENVER, CO 1534 555 582 5316 12788 2302 

37 GREELEY, co 4775 4817 4382 4017 1083 1877 

38 PUEBLO, co 2712 2892 2765 3028 8832 13176 

40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO 43017 42620 37774 44930 34195 15705 

41 NORWICH, CT 30 43 77 226 881 390 

42 HARTFORD, CT 99 151 281 897 2203 7002 

43 NEW YORK, NY 2552 1398 2314 9752 18849 71401 

45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 66091 15072 15985 27705 24187 10442 

46 DOVER, DE 136 426 679 378 498 900 

47 WASHINGTON, DC 1593 670 2680 1242 2541 3987 

49 JACKSONVILLE, FL 1462 942 1171 5975 3146 3384 

50 w. PALM BEACH, FL 5998 11196 24997 36188 12757 21333 

52 TAMPA, FL 25016 29520 13175 5790 25070 14221 

53 AUGUSTA, GA 275 169 257 706 1309 4211 

54 MACON, GA 5265 8708 25727 845 11638 6076 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 173 336 462 3829 3510 4979 

56 ATLANTA, GA 17285 23780 28779 11923 13866 9170 

58 SAVANNAH, GA 2222 10369 5923 1777 2964 1918 

59 ALBANY, GA 109 303 362 1024 867 2798 

62 SPOKANE, WA 2073 759 887 1311 1748 1983 

64 BOISE, 10 364 479 567 732 1055 1197 

65 PEORIA, IL 37103 41957 41926 10508 7031 3450 

66 DANVILLE, IL 49 139 538 1233 899 968 

67 CHICAGO, IL 8671 17717 22031 36877 54284 94954 

68 DUBUQUE, IA 136 221 270 143 956 1131 

69 DAVENPORT, lA 36184 40562 45922 54229 52725 29545 

70 ST. LOUIS, MD 2212 2932 3267 5146 7179 10124 

71 LASALLE, IL 268 572 718 1623 3097 3361 

72 PADUCAH, KY 969 1332 1543 2414 3371 6678 

73 ROCKFORD, IL 497 1026 1328 2286 4091 6294 

74 MARION, IL 125 268 337 565 1321 1562 

75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 249 531 668 1121 1650 2885 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 81019 85686 87029 83141 85722 74444 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 1262 1630 6272 9670 13351 24874 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 13050 162000 181690 179415 139460 77127 

80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 1619 794 909 1459 8462 14464 

82 SOUTH BEND, IN 404 983 1968 3839 5302 6386 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 147 263 949 2164 4642 5042 

84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 11254 12865 26198 23805 17197 13299 

85 OMAHA, NE 12555 14042 15884 17004 5043 2843 

86 SIOUX CITY, IA 240 334 396 551 1821 864 

88 WATERLOO, IA 661 974 1180 1822 3481 5533 

89 MASON CITY, IA 2806 3459 3822 4604 5850 6242 

91 OTTUMWA, IA 373 550 666 933 1283 1369 

92 DES MOINES, IA 1148 629 762 1084 5120 7613 

94 KANSAS CITY, MD 12220 13710 15517 17849 4868 2797 

95 SALINA, KS 102955 42470 47970 104417 132298 6699 

98 WICHITA, KS 507 1406 2123 3601 4551 6228 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 1757 2248 2557 1149 5087 7222 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 137173 29180 8758 85365 54989 36992 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 208 266 868 1575 2466 4407 

106 NEW ORLEANS, LA 103967 98895 118836 28606 142993 130545 

107 LEWISTON, ME 1156 2868 1667 3962 14241 15219 

109 BANGOR, ME 328 385 808 2427 9334 10550 

115 BALTIMORE, MD 9796 11059 11505 19024 14591 10535 

117 PITTSFIELD, MA 2399 527 856 1031 1070 1210 

119 BOSTON, MA 175 651 461 2017 3795 

120 PROVIDENCE, RI 151 404 291 1146 2191 

121 MANCHESTER, NH 95 280 486 1068 2078 3398 

122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 50838 59885 60825 13278 10318 7385 

123 DETROIT, MI 787 6834 8699 14638 27689 42774 

124 TOLEDO, OH 662 385 526 3015 1614 9375 

125 KALAMAZOO, MI 294 637 780 1629 3295 4157 

186 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table H2. NSPS discharge limits by demand region-Continued 

(TONS OF SOX PER YEAR) 

OEM 

REG II DEMAND REGION 1988 1993 1998 2005 2015 2025 

126 MARQUETTE, MI 17902 21237 21787 16023 4145 3036 

127 ST. CLOUD, MN 463 616 615 843 1088 273 

128 LA CROSSE, WI 3225 3929 4223 4787 5723 725 

129 DULUTH, MN 34439 10347 10422 9490 6884 4667 

131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 2682 5254 1516 2492 4308 3848 

132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN 2136 1278 1094 754 680 798 

136 GREENSBORO, NC 1850 2492 2627 3951 4612 3500 

137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD 342 431 456 676 1135 1820 

138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD 523 658 687 969 1313 1851 

139 SPRINGFIELD, MD 27736 8074 9106 10347 9720 4796 

143 MILES CITY, MT 15931 4422 3920 3405 2590 1212 

144 MISSOULA, MT 4483 1433 1526 2369 905 988 

146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 30266 33859 38302 60281 60047 3997 

147 WINNEMUCA, NV 13 19 24 35 357 412 

148 RENO, NV 3113 1191 1510 3937 5218 6035 

149 PLYMOUTH, NH 15 45 61 78 

150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 69 48 74 590 347 557 

151 SCRANTON, PA 498 3078 6852 9477 14113 18693 

152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 888 1209 1841 9248 18882 23783 

153 EL PASO, TX 421 513 861 497 8630 1186 

156 SOCORRO NM 31 42 65 37 59 74 

157 SANTE FE, NM 90 123 187 367 589 742 

158 SYRACUSE, NY 3348 2290 5066 3806 1447 4234 

159 BURLINGTON, VT 166 737 1425 2633 1344 3932 

160 ROCHESTER, NY 61 268 518 1521 1116 3321 

161 ALBANY, NY 9779 10356 3152 7067 2079 2209 

162 BUFFALO, NY 115 505 837 1139 2013 6219 

163 BINGHAMTON, NY 97 157 685 1064 1129 

164 OLEAN, NY 160 49 672 1433 775 

165 HICKORY, NC 197 365 385 706 982 1789 

166 RALEIGH, NC 17683 20762 24774 29817 29832 10206 

167 CHARLOTTE, NC 2396 1040 1220 6459 5349 6311 

170 WILMINGTON, NC 1962 2481 676 3523 1529 2457 

171 ASHEVILLE, NC 768 1035 114 568 2052 1374 

172 BISMARK, NO 27375 27109 24014 20799 15668 7012 

173 DAYTON, OH 1422 2746 3934 10690 9353 11595 

174 CLEVELAND, OH 7254 2840 16256 24422 34846 57402 

175 MANSFIELD, OH 2362 4392 1689 6700 3782 11111 

176 COLUMBUS, OH 7181 8109 7382 9276 13511 14539 

177 LIMA, OH 412 844 3761 5357 4365 5411 

178 DUBOIS, PA 65591 74897 23868 23607 63212 44919 

179 PARKERSBURG, wv 1994 27293 27063 22181 19808 18035 

181 WHEELING, WV 4994 6545 5760 877,3 12746 7007 

183 ZANESVILLE, OH 368 711 1018 1990 946 3772 

184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 747 973 1408 1160 4861 6122 

185 ENID, OK 27465 25030 22574 39404 39240 1996 

186 TULSA, OK 44468 44496 15552 15021 33233 21210 

188 MCALESTER, OK 17623 17603 16161 5865 12619 7830 

190 BEND, OR 7 11 47 168 

191 PENDLETON, OR 717 588 452 268 36 41 

193 PORTLAND, OR 39 49 73 120 176 3193 

195 ALTOONA, PA 1026 1887 2080 1138 1629 8539 

196 HARRISBURG, PA 1067 1964 747 1184 2147 3369 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 2639 4856 5245 3327 12385 21669 

199 CHARLESTON, sc 92 294 442 885 1221 2016 

200 COLUMBIA, sc 949 431 648 1221 1572 1979 

202 SPARTANBURG, sc 840 2020 485 1231 3799 4087 

204 GEORGETOWN, SC 16330 5030 4336 9290 6595 6091 

206 PIERRE, so 1335 1602 1742 2247 2844 3217 

207 KNOXVILLE, TN 423 658 809 1270 12233 17972 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 348 521 2507 3922 5904 9844 

209 JACKSON, TN 443 2930 3566 4708 6191 6213 

210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX 538 825 599 2315 5046 6356 

211 AMARILLO, TX 17043 15633 14300 25858 26466 15255 

212 AUSTIN, TX 98493 90087 81899 63514 68788 37399 

214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 23632 22271 21549 9994 22268 18340 

215 DALLAS, TX 4169 7061 12066 24252 38938 49109 

216 HOUSTON, TX 125145 117213 112901 49563 121416 90321 

217 SAN ANTONIO, TX 50734 46868 43529 35521 42140 23532 

220 SALT LAKE C lTV, UT 467 6779 7706 14814 8260 9013 

222 LYNCHBURG, VA 9070 11858 3595 13936 7097 7444 

223 NORFOLK, VA 1951 3608 4563 2427 3438 6286 

224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 1048 524 670 1826 3527 3896 

225 RICHMOND, VA 337 617 789 2102 3772 5978 

226 ROANOKE, VA 2911 5328 1845 12163 9717 10193 

229 SEATTLE, WA 1613 1594 1597 2363 3252 1042 

230 YAKIMA, WA 701 596 443 566 220 249 

231 ELKINS, WV 107 127 426 617 883 552 

232 GASSAWAY, WV 731 290 778 1045 441 866 

233 MARTINSBURG, WV 9842 10690 9094 3704 12810 13300 

234 CHARLESTON, WV 1551 18'44 1717 2254 1076 5837 

235 CLARKSBURG, WV 963 1145 365 1324 1907 3451 

236 BECKLEY, WV 2150 1610 782 1520 1160 1204 

Tables 187 
Table H2. NSPS discharge limits by demand region-Continued 

(TONS OF SOX PER YEAR) 

OEM 

REG II DEMAND REGION 1988 1993 

237 GREEN BAY, WI 1147 2876 

238 WAUSAU, WI 461 1157 

239 MILWAUKEE, WI 1273 3192 

240 MADISON, WI 202 506 

241 CASPER, WY 64 77 

242 CHEYENNE, WY 10678 11302 

243 ROC1< SPRINGS, WY 9579 9548 

1998 

4019 

1616 

4460 

708 

26 

10667 

8515 

========== ========== ========== 1860491 1880147 1880154 

188 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 

2005 2015 2025 

6748 15775 21026 

2807 6826 8072 

8493 16088 24853 

1198 1764 2432 

35 49 94 

10662 2906 2301 

2243 15444 979 

========== ========== ========== 1929697 2437063 2106743 
Table 11. Boiler capacity utilization schedule 

Years (Y) Since Start-up 

or Initial In-Service 

Year for Boiler 

y < 15 

15 < y < 20 

20 < y < 25 

25 < y < 30 

30 < y < 35 

35 < y < 40 

40 < y < 45 

45 < y <so 

y >so 

Weight for 

Capacity Utilization 

(1 = Base Load) 

1 

0.97 

0.86 

0.68 

0.47 

0.26 

0.17 

0.10 

o.o 

Table 12. Federal regions 

Federal 

Region # 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

Federal Region 

New England 

East 

Middle Atlantic 

Southeast 

Great Lakes 

South Central 

Central 

Mountain 

West 

Northwest 

Coal Utilization Factor (F) 

Applied by Year Against 

1985 Coal Use (Assumes 

Y = 18 in 1985) 

Year 1990 F=.86/.97 

Year 1995 F=.68/.97 

Year 2000 F=.47/.97 

Year 2005 F=.26/.97 

Year 2010 F=.17/.97 

Year 2 0 1 S F= • 1 0 I • 9 7 

Year 2020 F= 

States Contained 

Within Federal Region 

Maine 

Vermont 

New Hampshire 

Massachusetts 

Connecticut 

Rhode Island 

New York 

New Jersey 

Pennsylvania 

Delaware 

Maryland 

0/.97 

District of Columbla 

West Virginia 

Virginia 

Alabama 

Florida 

Georgia 

Kentucky 

Mississippi 

North Carolina 

South Carolina 

Tennessee 

Wisconsin 

Michigan 

Minnesota 

Illinois 

Indiana 

Ohio 

Arkansas 

Louisiana 

New Mexico 

Oklahoma 

Texas 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Missouri 

Nebraska 

Colorado 

Montana 

North Dakota 

South Dakota 

Utah 

Wyoming 

California 

Nevada 

Arizona 

Washington 

Oregon 

Idaho 

.89 

.70 

.48 

.27 

.18 

.10 

0 

Tables 189 
Table 13. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 1988 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 (1000 (1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

1 JACKSON, AL 634 368 0 0 0 0 

3 GADSDEN, AL 554 160 0 0 0 0 

4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 12216 8857 876 2994 0 0 

5 MOBILE, AL 4469 270 1632 0 9613 0 

7 DECATUR, AL 4802 205 0 0 0 0 

13 LAS VEGAS, NV 2848 1889 1283 0 0 0 

14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 15466 9216 4932 0 0 0 

15 PHOENIX, AZ 0 962 1109 0 0 0 

16 LITTLE ROCK, A it 0 243 644 0 0 0 

17 FT. SMITH, A~ 0 1957 0 0 0 0 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 604 56 1569 0 0 0 

19 MONROE, LA 0 220 0 0 0 0 

20 JONESBORO, AR 0 2578 934 0 0 0 

22 SHREVEPORT, LA 3911 5160 5200 0 0 0 

24 LOS ANGELES, CA 0 1083 0 0 1089 0 

28 SACRAMENTO, CA 0 84 0 0 0 0 

29 SAN DIEGO, CA 0 53 0 0 0 0 

30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 0 310 0 0 0 0 

31 FRESNO, CA 0 207 0 0 0 0 

36 DENVER, CO 2402 334 728 0 0 0 

37 GREELEY, co 0 969 837 0 0 0 

38 PUEBLO, CO 1859 550 0 0 0 0 

40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO 1626 4590 0 0 0 0 

41 NORWICH, CT 0 12 20 0 0 0 

42 HARTFORD, CT 710 42 0 0 0 0 

43 NEW YORK, NY 2330 213 1545 1204 480 0 

45 PHILAOEPHIA, PA 4178 5506 0 0 4716 0 

46 DOVER, DE 726 11 839 0 0 0 

47 WASHINGTON, DC 3949 134 0 0 0 0 

49 JACKSONVILLE, FL 0 120 0 0 0 0 

50 W. PALM BEACH, FL 0 3076 924 0 0 0 

52 TAMPA, FL 7722 8454 467 0 0 0 

53 AUGUSTA, GA 1616 23 0 0 0 0 

54 MACON, GA 4683 3398 2640 0 0 0 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 11408 90 2299 0 0 0 

56 ATLANTA, GA 7507 3723 0 0 0 0 

58 SAVANNAH, GA 1509 751 0 0 0 0 

59 ALBANY, GA 705 13 0 0 0 0 

62 SPOKANE, WA 0 144 0 0 0 0 

64 BOISE, ID 0 261 462 0 0 0 

65 PEORIA, IL 5677 7529 0 0 0 0 

66 DANVILLE, IL 1081 20 0 0 0 0 

67 CHICAGO, IL 10583 747 0 2135 42 0 

68 DUBUQUE, IA 531 11 0 0 0 0 

69 DAVENPORT, IA 1319 3117 0 0 0 0 

70 ST. LOUIS, MD 15283 177 0 119 0 0 

71 LASALLE, IL 927 23 0 0 0 0 

72 PADUCAH, KY 7604 91 0 0 0 0 

73 ROCKFORD, IL 1203 39 0 0 0 0 

74 MARION, IL 1079 12 871 0 0 0 

75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 4549 21 0 0 0 0 

77 EVANSVILLE. IN 14918 17703 2059 0 0 0 

78 LOUISVILLE. KY 3678 367 1181 919 0 0 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 5500 12255 598 0 0 0 

80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 1896 133 0 0 0 0 

82 SOUTH BEND, IN 1012 161 5739 9141 0 0 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 3669 43 0 0 0 0 

84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 4234 2528 0 0 0 0 

85 OMAHA, NE 873 2548 0 0 0 0 

86 SIOUX CITY, IA 1687 49 0 0 0 0 

88 WATERLOO, IA 573 55 0 0 0 0 

89 MASON CITY, lA 0 235 0 0 0 0 

91 OTTUMWA, lA 0 31 980 0 0 0 

92 DES MOINES, lA 323 87 0 0 0 0 

94 KANSAS CITY, MO 2070 2480 914 0 0 0 

95 SALINA. KS 725 7766 987 0 0 0 

98 WICHITA, KS 1650 43 0 0 0 0 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 1903 147 0 0 0 0 

103 HUNTINGTON. wv 19127 14270 0 0 0 0 

105 BOWLING GREEN. KY 733 60 0 0 0 0 

106 NEW ORLEANS, LA 0 10575 1194 0 8917 0 

107 LEWISTON, ME 0 96 0 0 0 0 

109 BANGOR, ME 0 138 0 0 0 0 

115 BALTIMORE, MD 1265 4123 1280 2410 8177 0 

116 BRANDYWINE, MD 1971 0 0 0 0 0 

117 PITTSFIELD. MA 0 196 20 0 0 0 

119 BOSTON, MA 1289 0 0 0 0 0 

120 PROVIDENCE. RI 2624 0 20 0 0 0 

121 MANCHESTER, NH 1066 7 0 0 0 0 

122 GRAND RAPIDS. MI 5319 3992 2870 0 0 0 

123 DETROIT, MI 6997 245 2836 2635 42 0 

124 TOLEDO, OH 10045 58 0 0 0 0 

125 KALAMAZOO, MI 1202 88 0 0 0 0 

126 MARQUETTE, MI 2285 1395 0 0 0 0 

127 ST. CLOUD, MN 0 36 1267 0 0 0 

128 LA CROSSE. WI 1141 224 0 0 0 0 

190 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 13. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 1988-Continued 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

129 DULUTH, MN 1381 2392 0 0 0 0 

131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 1920 209 0 0 0 0 

132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN 451 181 0 0 0 0 

136 GREENSBORO, NC 5765 145 766 0 0 0 

137 JEFFERSON CITY, MD 1256 29 0 0 0 0 

138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MD 2697 41 0 0 0 0 

139 SPRINGFIELD, MD 1683 1926 0 0 0 0 

143 MILES CITY, MT 1288 1182 427 0 0 0 

144 MISSOULA, MT 0 311 0 0 0 0 

146 GRANO ISLAND, NE 381 3229 2333 0 0 0 

147 WINNEMUCA, NV 0 9 501 0 0 0 

148 RENO, NV 0 216 0 0 0 0 

150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 818 6 5457 0 0 0 

151 SCRANTON, PA 3016 243 3692 0 0 0 

152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 0 218 0 0 0 0 

153 EL PASO, TX 0 104 0 0 0 0 

156 SOCORRO NM 0 8 0 0 0 0 

157 SANTE FE, NM 0 13 0 0 0 0 

158 SYRACUSE, NY 0 1019 5688 0 24 0 

159 BURLINGTON, VT 0 14 20 0 0 0 

160 ROCHESTER, NY 2200 5 0 0 0 0 

161 ALBANY, NY 0 799 0 0 0 0 

162 BUFFALO, NY 1851 10 0 0 18 0 

163 BINGHAMTON, NY 526 0 0 0 0 0 

164 OLEAN, NY 2101 0 0 0 0 0 

165 HICKORY, NC 4617 83 3066 0 0 0 

166 RALEIGH, NC 4563 5976 1690 0 0 0 

167 CHARLOTTE, NC 2308 209 1533 0 0 0 

170 WILMINGTON, NC 1324 161 0 0 115 0 

171 ASHEVILLE, NC 1304 64 0 0 0 0 

172 BISMARK, NO 2558 2315 268 0 0 0 

173 DAYTON, OH 485 117 0 0 0 0 

174 CLEVELAND, OH 7459 593 0 5393 17318 0 

175 MANSFIELD, OH 0 193 0 0 0 0 

176 COLUMBUS, OH 200 602 0 0 0 0 

177 LIMA, OH 0 343 0 0 0 0 

178 DUBOIS, PA 7853 5358 0 0 0 0 

179 PARKERSBURG, wv 5482 2010 3351 0 0 0 181 WHEELING, wv 16028 416 0 0 0 0 183 ZANESVILLE, OH 3759 30 448 0 0 0 

184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 0 64 0 0 0 0 

185 ENID, OK 0 5573 687 0 0 0 

186 TULSA, OK 0 3719 1361 0 0 0 

188 MCALESTER, OK 0 1474 0 0 0 0 

191 PENDLETON, OR 0 54 0 0 0 0 

193 PORTLAND, OR 3943 41 1402 0 0 0 

195 ALTOONA, PA 6134 84 0 0 0 0 

196 HARRISBURG, PA 3944 87 0 0 0 0 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 21547 220 1678 8260 0 0 

199 CHARLESTON, sc 1802 38 0 0 1150 0 

200 COLUMBIA, sc 2158 78 0 0 0 0 

202 SPARTANBURG, sc 355 70 0 0 0 0 

204 GEORGETOWN, sc 1200 1427 359 0 0 0 

206 PIERRE, so 1186 104 728 0 0 0 

207 KNOXVILLE, TN 9635 221 1533 0 0 0 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 7506 129 2053 172 0 0 

209 JACKSON, TN 0 167 766 0 0 0 

210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX 0 46 0 0 0 0 

211 AMARILLO, TX 0 3458 1952 0 0 0 

212 AUSTIN, TX 4044 8700 '5048 0 0 0 

213 LAREDO, TX 0 0 0 0 49 0 

214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 0 2087 0 0 0 0 

215 DALLAS, TX 0 359 0 0 0 0 

216 HOUSTON, TX 0 10780 0 401 319 0 

217 SAN ANTONIO, TX 0 4481 0 0 0 0 

220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 1391 393 0 1371 0 0 

222 LYNCHBURG, VA 0 793 0 0 0 0 

223 NORFOLK, VA 1352 164 0 913 45934 0 

224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 525 88 2544 0 0 0 

225 RICHMOND, VA 2403 142 0 0 0 0 

226 ROANOKE, VA 2072 242 0 0 0 0 

229 SEATTLE, WA 0 121 462 0 0 0 

230 YAKIMA, WA 0 52 0 0 0 0 

231 ELKINS, wv 3667 36 0 0 0 0 

232 GASSAWAY, wv 0 61 0 0 0 0 

233 MARTINSBURG, wv 249 804 0 0 0 0 

234 CHARLESTON, wv 7188 130 0 1970 0 0 

235 CLARKSBURG, wv 7348 80 0 0 0 0 

236 BECKLEY, wv 0 211 1272 0 0 0 

237 GREEN BAY, WI 1370 95 0 0 0 0 

238 WAUSAU, WI 1340 37 0 0 0 0 

239 MILWAUKEE, WI 2918 110 0 0 0 0 

240 MADISON, WI 1229 17 0 0 0 0 

241 CASPER, WY 2306 13 0 0 0 0 

242 CHEYENNE, WY 0 2167 305 0 0 0 

243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 6515 1944 0 0 0 0 

============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ 438646 242153 103146 40037 98003 0 

Table~ 191 
Table 14. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 1998 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION :ONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

1 JACKSON, AL 472 569 0 0 0 0 

3 GADSDEN, AL 186 427 0 0 0 0 

4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 7946 11294 1318 2930 0 0 

5 MOBILE, AL 3421 611 3286 0 10462 0 

7 DECATJR, AL 2855 316 3760 0 0 0 

13 LAS VEGAS, NV 2215 2221 5506 0 0 0 

14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 12177 9616 9887 0 0 0 

15 PHOENIX, AZ 0 2044 2364 0 0 0 

16 liTTLE ROCK, AR 0 560 3359 0 0 0 

17 FT. SMITH, AR 0 1681 0 0 0 0 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 466 104 4121 0 0 0 

19 MONROE, LA 0 535 1420 0 0 0 

20 JONESBORO, AF!: 0 2195 786 0 0 0 

22 SHREVEPORT, LA 3586 4486 14157 0 0 0 

24 LOS ANGELES, CA 0 866 0 0 1185 0 

28 SACRAMENTO, CA 0 74 0 0 0 0 

29 SAN DIEGO, CA 0 47 0 0 0 0 

30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 0 275 0 0 0 0 

31 FRESNO, CA 0 186 0 0 0 0 

36 DENVER, co 1510 415 944 0 0 0 

37 GREELEY, CO 0 889 885 0 0 0 

38 PUEBLO, co 1409 561 0 0 0 0 

40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO 1347 4030 0 0 0 0 

41 NORWICH, CT 0 33 527 0 0 0 

42 HARTFORD, CT 353 118 1336 0 0 0 

43 NEW YORK, NY 2495 974 2454 1178 522 0 

45 PHI LADEPHIA, PA 2504 6729 0 0 5132 0 

46 DOVER, DE 514 57 1033 0 0 0 

47 WASHINGTON, DC 1998 225 0 0 0 0 

49 JACKSONVILLE, FL 0 478 0 0 0 0 

50 w. PALM BEACH, FL 0 4178 1389 0 0 0 

52 TAMPA, FL 5799 10712 702 0 0 0 

53 AUGUSTA, GA 449 87 0 0 0 0 

54 MACON, GA 2763 4300 4775 0 0 0 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 8990 241 4631 0 0 0 

56 ATLANTA, GA 5886 4810 0 0 0 0 

58 SAVANNAH, GA 1090 990 0 0 0 0 

59 ALBANY, GA 426 58 0 0 0 0 

62 SPOKANE, WA 0 235 886 0 0 0 

64 BOISE, 10 0 406 1001 0 0 0 

65 PEORIA, IL 4365 8508 0 0 0 0 

66 DANVILLE, IL 317 52 0 0 0 0 67 CHICAGO, IL 6939 1862 0 2089 45 0 

68 DUBUQUE, IA 232 20 2137 0 0 0 

69 DAVENPORT, IA 822 3956 0 0 0 0 

70 ST. LOUIS, MO 11754 281 0 116 0 0 71 LASALLE, IL 502 61 0 0 0 0 72 PADUCAH, KY 3952 145 0 0 0 0 

73 ROCKFORD, IL 732 113 0 0 0 0 

74 MARION, IL 625 31 922 0 0 0 

75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 3005 56 0 0 0 0 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 11695 20233 2180 0 0 0 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 2340 540 1775 899 0 0 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 3871 15594 838 0 0 0 

80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 1418 290 0 0 0 0 

82 SOUTH BEND, IN 876 361 8048 8946 0 0 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 1468 93 0 0 0 0 

84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 2848 2905 0 0 0 0 

85 OMAHA, NE 528 3223 0 0 0 0 

86 SIOUX CITY, IA 1373 80 0 0 0 0 

88 WATERLOO, IA 397 99 0 0 0 0 

89 MASON CITY, IA 0 320 0 0 0 0 

91 OTTUMWA, IA 0 56 2029 0 0 0 

92 DES MOINES, IA 268 155 0 0 0 0 

94 KANSAS CITY, MO 1318 3149 1894 0 0 0 

95 SALINA, KS 482 9734 2044 0 0 0 

98 WICHITA, KS 1260 179 0 0 0 0 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 1306 214 0 0 0 0 

103 HUNTINGTON, wv 13396 16272 3321 0 0 0 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 522 88 0 0 0 0 

106 NEW ORLEANS, LA 0 10141 6869 0 9705 0 

107 LEWISTON, ME 0 507 334 0 0 0 

109 BANGOR, ME 0 340 0 0 0 0 

115 BALTIMORE, MD 872 4843 1575 2358 8900 0 

116 BRANDYWINE, MD 1510 0 0 0 0 0 

117 PITTSFIELD, MA 0 360 527 0 0 0 

119 BOSTON, MA 890 54 0 0 0 0 

120 PROVIDENCE, RI 1558 34 973 0 0 0 

121 MANCHESTER, NH 669 47 0 0 0 0 

122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 3721 4722 4024 0 0 0 

123 DETROIT, MI 3769 675 3608 2578 45 0 

124 TOLEDO, OH 6800 178 0 0 0 0 125 KALAMAZOO, MI 953 243 0 0 0 0 126 MARQUETTE, MI 1868 1698 0 0 0 0 127 ST. CLOUD, MN 0 48 1341 0 0 0 128 LA CROSSE, WI 767 310 15430 0 0 0 129 DULUTH, MN 1077 2761 7481 0 0 0 131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 1501 507 0 0 0 0 132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN 129 93 0 0 0 0 136 GREENSBORO, NC 4748 206 1543 0 0 0 137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 835 39 0 0 0 0 

192 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 14. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 1998-Continued 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 (1000 (1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 2177 55 0 0 0 0 

139 SPRINGFIELD, MO 989 2413 0 0 0 0 

143 MILES CITY, MT 1019 1039 413 0 0 0 

144 MISSOULA, MT 0 404 0 0 0 0 

146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 358 4087 9898 0 0 0 

147 WINNEMUCA, NV 0 17 2698 0 0 0 

148 RENO, NV 0 400 0 0 0 0 

149 PLYMOUTH, NH 0 6 445 0 0 0 

150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 443 23 4590 0 0 0 

151 SCRANTON, PA 2138 571 2295 0 0 0 

152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 0 453 0 0 0 0 

153 EL PASO, TX 0 209 0 0 0 0 

156 SOCORRO NM 0 16 160 0 0 0 

157 SANTE FE, NM 0 27 1420 0 0 0 

158 SYRACUSE, NY 0 422 8379 0 27 0 

159 BURLINGTON, VT 0 119 973 0 0 0 

160 ROCHESTER, NY 1264 43 1823 0 0 0 

161 ALBANY, NY 0 791 7291 0 0 0 

162 BUFFALO, NY 706 81 1823 0 20 0 

163 BINGHAMTON, NV 183 15 1823 0 0 0 

164 OLEAN, NV 865 26 3645 0 0 0 

165 HICKORY, NC 3214 118 6174 0 0 0 

166 RALEIGH, NC 3053 7497 2933 0 0 0 

167 CHARLOTTE, NC 1318 374 30tH 0 0 0 

170 WILMINGTON, NC 843 229 0 0 125 0 

171 ASHEVILLE, NC 772 91 0 0 0 0 

172 BISMARK, NO 1962 2030 259 0 0 0 

173 DAYTON, OH 659 386 0 0 0 0 

114 CLEVELAND, OH 5085 1364 0 5278 18849 0 

175 MANSFIELD, OH 0 514 0 0 0 0 

176 COLUMBUS, OH 263 580 0 0 0 0 

177 LIMA, OH 0 444 0 0 0 0 178 DUBOIS, PA 2817 6460 0 0 0 0 

179 PARKERSBURG, wv 2707 2269 4490 0 0 0 

181 WHEELING, wv 10394 560 1661 0 0 0 

183 ZANESVILLE, OH 2939 100 629 0 0 0 

184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 0 121 7098 0 0 0 

185 ENID, OK 0 4581 578 0 0 0 

186 TULSA, OK 0 3156 4190 0 0 0 

188 MCALESTER, OK 0 1244 0 0 0 0 

190 BEND, OR 0 6 443 0 0 0 

191 PENDLETON, OR 0 34 277 0 0 0 

193 PORTLAND, OR 3061 66 2445 0 0 0 

195 ALTOONA, PA 3688 194 0 0 0 0 

196 HARRISBURG, PA 2418 202 0 0 0 0 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 13904 510 2065 8084 0 0 

199 CHARLESTON, sc 1491 136 0 0 1251 0 

200 COLUMBIA, sc 1499 199 0 0 0 0 

202 SPARTANBURG, sc 446 253 0 0 0 0 

204 GEORGETOWN, sc 1070 1844 540 0 0 0 

206 PIERRE, so 1079 136 944 0 0 0 

207 KNOXVILLE, TN 4903 422 24392 0 0 0 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 4808 236 18125 169 0 0 

209 JACKSON, TN 0 305 25354 0 0 0 

210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX 0 122 2839 0 0 0 

211 AMARILLO, TX 0 2902 1864 0 0 0 

212 AUSTIN, TX 2554 7234 8728 0 0 0 

213 LAREDO, TX 0 0 0 0 53 0 

214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 0 1903 1420 0 0 0 

215 DALLAS, TX 0 939 12776 0 0 0 

216 HOUSTON, TX 0 9725 8518 392 348 0 

217 SAN ANTONIO, TX 0 3845 4968 0 0 0 

220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 1216 589 0 1342 0 0 

222 LYNCHBURG, VA 0 1103 0 0 0 0 

223 NORFOLK, VA 1074 383 0 893 49993 0 

224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 435 205 4131 0 0 0 

225 RICHMOND, VA 1644 332 0 0 0 0 

226 ROANOKE, VA 1678 566 0 0 0 0 

229 SEATTLE, WA 0 119 558 0 0 0 

230 YAKIMA, WA 0 33 1773 0 0 0 

231 ELKINS, wv 2465 40 1661 0 0 0 

232 GASSAWAY, wv 0 67 9964 0 0 0 

233 MARTINSBURG, wv 144 743 1661 0 0 0 

234 CHARLESTON, wv 5249 144 3321 1928 0 0 

235 CLARKSBURG, wv 5027 89 4982 0 0 0 

236 BECKLEY, wv 0 116 10369 0 0 0 

237 GREEN BAY, WI 1016 332 16641 0 0 0 

238 WAUSAU, WI 700 128 5103 0 0 0 

239 MILWAUKEE, WI 1649 384 7962 0 0 0 

240 MADISON, WI 1081 58 14598 0 0 0 

241 CASPER, WY 1424 18 2234 0 0 0 

242 CHEYENNE, WY 0 2165 3274 0 0 0 

243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 5181 1728 9914 0 0 0 

=====-======= ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ 298207 278999 432039 39180 106662 0 

Tab ~s 193 
Table 15. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 2025 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 (1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 (1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

1 JACKSON, AL 0 1469 0 0 0 0 

3 GADSDEN, AL 0 996 0 0 0 0 

4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 329 5940 3926 4268 0 0 

5 MOBILE, AL 270 2440 9789 0 16838 0 

7 DECATUR, AL 0 1333 13796 0 0 0 

13 LAS VEGAS, NV 128 1250 5864 0 0 0 

14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 1301 4088 22241 0 0 0 

15 PHOENIX, AZ 0 4611 6255 0 0 0 

16 LITTLE ROCK, A~ 0 2125 10795 0 0 0 

17 FT. SMITH, AR 0 949 0 0 0 0 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 0 461 12846 0 0 0 

19 MONROE, LA 0 2155 4798 0 0 0 

20 JONESBORO, AR 0 1122 2099 0 0 0 

22 SHREVEPORT, LA 1328 3565 43350 0 0 0 

24 LOS ANGELES, CA 0 1705 12509 0 1907 0 

28 SACRAMENTO, CA 0 149 9382 0 0 0 

29 SAN DIEGO, CA 0 95 3127 0 0 0 

30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 0 551 3127 0 0 0 

31 FRESNO, CA 0 269 18763 0 0 0 

36 DENVER, co 0 1641 2347 0 0 0 

37 GREELEY, CO 0 477 2200 0 0 0 

38 PUEBLO, CO 112 1025 0 0 0 0 

40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO 170 1222 0 0 0 0 

41 NORWICH, CT 0 93 2097 0 0 0 

42 HARTFORD, CT 0 688 6292 0 0 0 

43 NEW YORK, NY 0 7017 6649 1716 841 0 

45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 0 5312 0 0 8260 0 

46 DOVER, DE 32 244 2791 0 0 0 

47 WASHINGTON, DC 0 978 0 0 0 0 

49 JACKSONVILLE, FL 0 937 0 0 0 0 

50 w. PALM BEACH, FL 0 2163 4139 0 0 0 

52 TAMPA, FL 327 3947 2092 0 0 0 

53 AUGUSTA, GA 0 390 0 0 0 0 

54 MACON, GA 0 1682 14227 0 0 0 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 687 758 13795 0 0 0 

56 ATLANTA, GA 538 2088 0 0 0 0 

58 SAVANNAH, GA 125 531 0 0 0 0 

59 ALBANY, GA 0 259 0 0 0 0 

62 SPOKANE, WA 0 525 3990 0 0 0 

64 BOISE, ID 0 776 3990 0 0 0 

65 PEORIA, IL 335 2459 0 0 0 0 

66 DANVILLE, IL 0 243 0 0 0 0 

67 CHICAGO, IL 621 7954 0 3043 73 0 

68 DUBUQUE, IA 0 83 7141 0 0 0 

69 DAVENPORT, lA 0 2475 0 0 0 0 

70 ST. LOUIS, MD 867 848 0 169 0 0 

71 LASALLE, IL 0 282 0 0 0 0 

72 PADUCAH, KY 93 570 0 0 0 0 

73 ROCKFORD, IL 0 529 0 0 0 0 

74 MARION, IL 0 143 2455 0 0 0 

75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 45 242 0 0 0 0 

77 EVANSVILLE, IN 1089 6500 5802 0 0 0 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 219 2092 5288 1310 0 0 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 743 6532 2231 0 0 0 

80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 121 1234 0 0 0 0 

82 SOUTH BEND, IN 72 1106 21423 13030 0 0 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 0 429 0 0 0 0 

84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 96 1277 0 0 0 0 

85 OMAHA, NE 0 2026 0 0 0 0 

86 SIOUX CITY, lA 111 166 0 0 0 0 

88 WATERLOO, IA 0 407 0 0 0 0 

89 MASON CITY, lA 0 460 0 0 0 0 

91 OTTUMWA, lA 0 101 7711 0 0 0 

92 DES MOINES, lA 0 592 0 0 0 0 

94 KANSAS CITY, MD 49 1994 7197 0 0 0 

95 SALINA, KS 14 4776 7768 0 0 0 

98 WICHITA, KS 49 475 0 0 0 0 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 71 677 0 0 0 0 

103 HUNTINGTON, WV 794 5221 11165 0 0 0 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 0 369 0 0 0 0 

106 NEW ORLEANS, LA 0 11140 22371 0 15619 0 

107 LEWISTON, ME 0 1496 1573 0 0 0 

109 BANGOR, ME 0 1001 0 0 0 0 

115 BALTIMORE, MD 0 2513 4257 3435 14324 0 

116 BRANDYWINE, MD 40 0 0 0 0 0 

117 PITTSFIELD, MA 0 115 2097 0 0 0 

119 BOSTON, MA 44 360 0 0 0 0 

120 PROVIDENCE, RI 28 215 4195 0 0 0 

121 MANCHESTER, NH 0 322 0 0 0 0 

122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 665 2470 10711 0 0 0 

123 DETROIT, MI 0 3142 ~604 3756 73 0 

124 TOLEDO, OH 211 775 0 0 0 0 

125 KALAMAZOO, MI 99 1044 0 0 0 0 

126 MARQUETTE, MI 479 1015 0 0 0 0 

127 ST. CLOUD, MN 0 91 3570 0 0 0 

128 LA CROSSE, WI 0 517 51547 0 0 0 

129 DULUTH, MN 68 1236 24992 0 0 0 

131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 0 2165 0 0 0 0 

132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN 0 81 0 0 0 0 

136 GREENSBORO, NC 532 606 4599 0 0 0 

137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 0 152 0 0 0 0 

194 Economic Effects of Western Federal land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 15. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 2025-continued 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 (1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 190 155 0 0 0 0 

139 SPRINGFIELD, MO 23 1271 0 0 0 0 

143 MILES CITY, MT 71 321 1027 0 0 0 

144 MISSOULA, MT 0 704 0 0 0 0 

146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 0 2590 40839 0 0 0 

147 WINNEMUCA, NV 0 38 0 0 0 0 

148 RENO, NV 0 885 0 0 0 0 

149 PLYMOUTH, NH 0 19 2097 0 0 0 

150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 14 151 10404 0 0 0 

151 SCRANTON, PA 894 1837 5202 0 0 0 

152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 0 1798 0 0 0 0 

153 EL PASO, TX 0 845 0 0 0 0 

156 SOCORRO NM 0 62 540 0 0 0 

157 SANTE FE, NM 0 109 4798 0 0 0 

158 SYRACUSE, NY 0 416 21134 0 43 0 

159 BUR Ll NGTON, VT 0 386 4195 0 0 0 

160 ROCHESTER, NY 0 321 5202 0 0 0 

161 ALBANY, NY 0 598 20808 0 0 0 

162 BUFFALO, NY 0 605 5202 0 32 0 

163 BINGHAMTON, NY 0 105 5202 0 0 0 

164 OLEAN, NY 0 191 10405 0 0 0 

165 HICKORY, NC 81 445 18395 0 0 0 

166 RALEIGH, NC 67 2825 8737 0 0 0 

167 CHARLOTTE, NC 0 1585 9197 0 0 0 

170 WILMINGTON, NC 47 617 0 0 201 0 

171 ASHEVILLE, NC 37 342 0 0 0 0 

172 BISMARK, NO 99 593 645 0 0 0 

173 DAYTON, OH 0 1839 0 0 0 0 

174 CLEVELAND, OH 430 4816 0 7688 30335 0 

175 MANSFIELD, OH 0 1073 0 0 0 0 

176 COLUMBUS, OH 0 1142 0 0 0 0 177 LIMA, OH 0 858 0 0 0 0 178 DUBOIS, PA 0 4196 0 0 0 0 

179 PARKERSBURG, wv 0 1742 12083 0 0 0 

181 WHEELING, wv 1021 1703 5582 0 0 0 

183 ZANESVILLE, OH 279 349 1674 0 0 0 

184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 0 476 23990 0 0 0 

185 ENID, OK 0 1423 1544 0 0 0 

186 TULSA, OK 0 1617 12984 0 0 0 

188 MCALESTER, OK 0 597 0 0 0 0 

190 BEND, OR 0 15 1995 0 0 0 

191 PENDLETON, OR 0 11 1247 0 0 0 

193 PORTLAND, OR 112 296 9974 0 0 0 

195 ALTOONA, PA 156 798 0 0 0 0 

196 HARRISBURG, PA 0 912 0 0 0 0 

197 PITTSBURGH, PA 418 2093 5582 11775 0 0 

199 CHARLESTON, sc 83 558 0 0 2014 0 

200 COLUMBIA, sc 60 548 0 0 0 0 

202 SPARTANBURG, sc 0 1131 0 0 0 0 

204 GEORGETOWN, sc 206 1530 1610 0 0 0 

206 PIERRE, so 115 251 2347 0 0 0 

207 KNOXVILLE, TN 0 1824 87374 0 0 0 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 169 925 64378 246 0 0 

209 JACKSON, TN 0 570 91973 0 0 0 

210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX 0 494 9596 0 0 0 

211 AMARILLO, TX 0 1223 4978 0 0 0 

212 AUSTIN, TX 174 3295 25324 0 0 0 

213 LAREDO, TX 0 0 0 0 86 0 

214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 0 1616 4798 0 0 0 

215 DALLAS, TX 0 3819 43182 0 0 0 

216 HOUSTON, TX 0 7333 28788 571 559 0 

217 SAN ANTONIO, TX 0 2073 16793 0 0 0 

220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 0 2388 0 1954 0 0 

222 LYNCHBURG, VA 0 1870 0 0 0 0 

223 NORFOLK, VA 167 1579 0 1301 80459 0 

224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 0 929 11165 0 0 0 

225 RICHMOND, VA 0 1502 0 0 0 0 

226 ROANOKE, VA 0 2560 0 0 0 0 

229 SEATTLE, WA 0 276 1995 0 0 0 

230 YAKIMA, WA 0 66 7979 0 0 0 

231 ELKINS, wv 42 149 5582 0 0 0 

232 GASSAWAY, wv 0 122 33495 0 0 0 

233 MARTINSBURG, wv 0 1242 5582 0 0 0 

234 CHARLESTON, wv 183 541 11165 2808 0 0 

235 CLARKSBURG, wv 118 333 16747 0 0 0 

236 BECKLEY, wv 0 169 33495 0 0 0 

237 GREEN BAY, WI 0 1576 55596 0 0 0 

238 WAUSAU, WI 0 608 17049 0 0 0 

239 MILWAUKEE, WI 0 1823 26599 0 0 0 

240 MADISON, WI 165 204 48769 0 0 0 

241 CASPER, WY 32 67 7041 0 0 0 

242 CHEYENNE, WY 0 1640 10121 0 0 0 

243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 367 652 31245 0 0 0 

============ ~=========== ====~======= ============ ============ ============ 18722 244000 1420423 57070 171664 0 
Table 16. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 2053 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 ( 1000 (1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

1 JACKSON, AL 0 1479 0 0 0 0 

3 GADSDEN, AL 0 1003 0 0 0 0 

4 BIRMINGHAM, AL 0 4536 5056 4487 0 0 

5 MOBILE, AL 0 2674 12607 0 17656 0 

1 DECATUR, AL 0 1342 17766 0 0 0 

13 LAS VEGAS, NV 0 935 7944 0 0 0 

14 FLAGSTAFF, AZ 0 2913 29232 0 0 26382 

15 PHOENIX, AZ 0 4667 8474 0 0 0 

16 UTTLE ROCK, AR 0 2187 13873 0 0 0 

17 FT. SMITH, Aft 0 746 0 0 0 0 

18 MEMPHIS, TN 0 465 16530 0 0 0 

19 MONROE, LA 0 2220 6166 0 0 0 

20 JONESBORO, A~ 0 850 2697 0 0 0 

22 SHREVEPORT, LA 0 4232 55709 0 0 49946 

24 LOS ANGELES, CA 0 1725 16948 0 2000 0 

28 SACRAMENTO, CA 0 150 12711 0 0 0 

29 SAN DIEGO, CA 0 96 4237 0 0 0 

30 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 0 558 4237 0 0 0 

31 FRESNO, CA 0 272 25422 0 0 0 

36 DENVER, co 0 1616 3026 0 0 0 

37 GREELEY, co 0 373 2836 0 0 0 

38 PUEBLO, co 0 1058 0 0 0 0 

40 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS,CO 0 679 0 0 0 0 

41 NORWICH, CT 0 94 2715 0 0 0 

42 HARTFORD, CT 0 694 8144 0 0 0 

43 NEW YORK, NY 0 6864 8583 1804 882 0 

45 PHILADEPHIA, PA 0 4409 0 0 8661 0 

46 DOVER, DE 0 259 3572 0 0 0 

47 WASHINGTON, DC 0 945 0 0 0 0 

49 JACKSONVILLE, FL 0 943 0 0 0 0 

50 w. PALM BEACH, FL 0 1606 5330 0 0 0 

52 TAMPA, FL 0 2456 2695 0 0 0 

53 AUGUSTA, GA 0 393 0 0 0 0 

54 MACON, GA 0 1039 18321 0 0 0 

55 CHATTANOOGA, TN 0 1067 17766 0 0 0 

56 ATLANTA, GA 0 1553 0 0 0 0 

58 SAVANNAH, GA 0 484 0 0 0 0 

59 ALBANY, GA 0 261 0 0 0 0 

62 SPOKANE, WA 0 533 5104 0 0 0 

64 BOISE, 10 0 787 5104 0 0 0 

65 PEORIA, IL 0 1557 0 0 0 0 

66 DANVILLE, IL 0 242 0 0 0 0 

67 CHICAGO, IL 0 8578 0 3199 76 0 

68 DUBUQUE, IA 0 84 9121 0 0 26382 

69 DAVENPORT, lA 0 1613 0 0 0 47172 

10 ST. LOUIS, MO 0 1180 0 178 0 0 

71 LASALLE, IL 0 280 0 0 0 0 

72 PADUCAH, KY 0 623 0 0 0 0 

73 ROCKFORD, IL 0 527 0 0 0 0 

74 MARION, IL 0 143 3135 0 0 0 

75 SPRINGFIELD, IL 0 261 0 0 0 26381 

17 EVANSVILLE, IN 0 4535 7410 0 0 0 

78 LOUISVILLE, KY 0 2292 6811 1377 0 0 

79 CINCINNATI, OH 0 4776 2850 0 0 0 

80 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 0 1331 0 0 0 0 

82 SOUTH BEND, IN 0 1161 27362 13698 0 0 

83 BLOOMINGTON, IN 0 427 0 0 0 0 

84 TERRA HAUTE, IN 0 989 0 0 0 0 

85 OMAHA, NE 0 1329 0 0 0 0 

86 SIOUX CITY, IA 0 189 0 0 0 0 

88 WATERLOO, IA 0 411 0 0 0 0 

89 MASON CITY, IA 0 464 0 0 0 0 

91 OTTUMWA, IA 0 102 10456 0 0 0 

92 DES MOINES, lA 0 597 0 0 0 0 

94 KANSAS CITY, MO 0 1364 9758 0 0 0 

95 SALINA, KS 0 2577 10534 0 0 0 

98 WICHITA, KS 0 502 0 0 0 0 

102 LEXINGTON, KY 0 730 0 0 0 0 

103 HUNTINGTON, wv 0 3494 14288 0 0 26384 

105 BOWLING GREEN, KY 0 372 0 0 0 49944 

106 NEW ORLEANS, LA 0 10295 28750 0 16377 0 

107 LEWISTON, ME 0 1509 2036 0 0 0 

109 BANGOR, ME 0 1010 0 0 0 0 

115 BALTIMORE, MD 0 1877 5447 3611 15019 0 

117 PITTSFIELD, MA 0 116 2715 0 0 0 

119 BOSTON, MA 0 395 0 0 0 0 

120 PROVIDENCE, RI 0 236 5429 0 0 0 

121 MANCHESTER, NH 0 325 0 0 0 0 

122 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 0 2435 13681 0 0 0 

123 DETROIT, MI 0 3128 12267 3948 76 0 

124 TOLEDO, OH 0 836 0 0 0 0 

125 KALAMAZOO, MI 0 1126 0 0 0 0 

126 MARQUETTE, Ml 0 855 0 0 0 0 

127 ST. CLOUD, MN 0 91 4560 0 0 0 

128 LA CROSSE, WI 0 490 65840 0 0 0 

129 DULUTH, MN 0 966 31922 0 0 0 

131 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 0 2156 0 0 0 0 

132 THIEF RIVER FALLS,MN 0 81 0 0 0 0 

136 GREENSBORO, NC 0 854 5922 0 0 0 

137 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 0 154 0 0 0 0 

138 CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO 0 219 0 0 0 0 

196 Economic Effects of Western Federal Land-Use Restrictions on U.S. Coal Markets 
Table 16. Coal demands at the AQCR level, 2053-Continued 

(THOUSANDS OF TONS OF COAL CONTAINING 24 MILLION BTU PER TON) 

SIP NSPS RNSPS MET EXP SYN 

OEM REG ( 1000 ( 1000 ( 1000 (1000 (1000 ( 1000 

(AQCR) DEMAND REGION TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) TONS) 

139 SPRINGFIELD, MO 0 742 0 0 0 0 

143 MILES CITY, MT 0 182 1324 0 0 0 

144 MISSOULA, MT 0 693 0 0 0 0 

146 GRAND ISLAND, NE 0 1706 55377 0 0 51214 

147 WINNEMUCA, NV 0 38 0 0 0 0 

148 REND, NV 0 896 0 0 0 0 

149 PLYMOUTH, NH 0 19 2715 0 0 0 

150 ATLANTIC CITY, NJ 0 158 13413 0 0 0 

151 SCRANTON, PA 0 2538 6707 0 0 0 

152 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 0 1852 0 0 0 0 

153 EL PASO, TX 0 871 0 0 0 0 

154 LAS VEGAS, NM 0 0 0 0 0 26382 

156 SOCORRO NM 0 64 694 0 0 0 

157 SANTE FE, NM 0 112 6166 0 0 0 

158 SYRACUSE, NY 0 407 27246 0 45 0 

159 BURLINGTON, VT 0 377 5429 0 0 0 

160 ROCHESTER, NY 0 313 6707 0 0 0 

161 ALBANY, NY 0 584 26827 0 0 0 

162 BUFFALO, NY 0 591 6707 0 33 0 

163 BINGHAMTON, NY 0 103 6707 0 0 0 

164 OLEAN, NY 0 187 13413 0 0 0 

165 HICKORY, NC 0 488 23689 0 0 0 

166 RALEIGH, NC 0 1736 11252 0 0 0 

167 CHARLOTTE, NC 0 1596 11844 0 0 0 

170 WILMINGTON, NC 0 657 0 0 211 0 

171 ASHEVILLE, NC 0 375 0 0 0 0 

172 BISMARK, NO 0 318 832 0 0 49942 

173 DAYTON, OH 0 1831 0 0 0 0 

174 CLEVELAND, OH 0 5159 0 8082 31807 0 

175 MANSFIELD, OH 0 1069 0 0 0 0 

176 COLUMBUS, OH 0 1137 0 0 0 0 

177 LIMA, OH 0 855 0 0 0 0 178 DUBOIS, PA 0 3382 0 0 0 0 179 PARKERSBURG, wv 0 1468 15455 0 0 26382 181 WHEELING, wv 0 2346 7143 0 0 0 183 ZANESVILLE, OH 0 474 2138 0 0 0 184 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 0 491 30828 0 0 0 185 ENID, OK 0 790 1985 0 0 0 186 TULSA, OK 0 1226 16687 0 0 0 188 MCALESTER, OK 0 440 0 0 0 0 190 BEND, OR 0 16 2552 0 0 0 191 PENDLETON, OR 0 11 1595 0 0 0 193 PORTLAND, OR 0 324 12759 0 0 0 195 ALTOONA, PA 0 847 0 0 0 0 196 HARRISBURG, PA 0 881 0 0 0 0 197 PITTSBURGH, PA 0 2222 7143 12378 0 0 199 CHARLESTON, sc 0 612 0 0 2111 0 200 COLUMBIA, sc 0 579 0 0 0 0 

202 SPARTANBURG, sc 0 1139 0 0 0 0 204 GEORGETOWN, sc 0 1470 2073 0 0 0 

206 PIERRE, so 0 262 3025 0 0 0 207 KNOXVILLE, TN 0 1821 112523 0 0 0 

208 NASHVILLE, TN 0 1014 82909 258 0 0 209 JACKSON, TN 0 574 118448 0 0 0 210 WICHITA, FALLS, TX 0 509 12332 0 0 0 211 AMARILLO, TX 0 844 6397 0 0 0 212 AUSTIN, TX 0 2464 32545 0 0 0 213 LAREDO, TX 0 0 0 0 90 0 214 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 0 1424 6166 0 0 0 215 DALLAS, TX 0 3934 55494 0 0 0 216 HOUSTON, TX 0 6320 36997 600 587 0 217 SAN ANTONIO, TX 0 1603 21581 0 0 0 

220 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 0 2351 0 2055 0 0 222 LYNCHBURG, VA 0 1807 0 0 0 0 

223 NORFOLK, VA 0 1676 0 1368 84367 0 

224 FREDERICKSBURG, VA 0 898 14287 0 0 0 

225 RICHMOND, VA 0 1451 0 0 0 0 

226 ROANOKE, VA 0 2474 0 0 0 0 

229 SEATTLE, WA 0 280 2552 0 0 0 

230 YAKIMA, WA 0 67 10207 0 0 0 

231 ELKINS, wv 0 159 7144 0 0 0 

232 GASSAWAY, wv 0 117 42861 0 0 0 

233 MARTINSBURG, wv 0 1201 7143 0 0 0 

234 CHARLESTON, wv 0 574 14288 2952 0 0 

235 CLARKSBURG, wv 0 354 21431 0 0 0 

236 BECKLEY, wv 0 163 42863 0 0 0 

237 GREEN BAY, WI 0 1570 71013 0 0 0 

238 WAUSAU, WI 0 605 21776 0 0 0 

239 MILWAUKEE, WI 0 1815 33974 0 0 0 

240 MADISON, WI 0 276 62291 0 0 0 

241 CASPER, WY 0 73 9076 0 0 0 

242 CHEYENNE, WY 0 1422 13048 0 0 0 

243 ROCK SPRINGS, WY 0 495 40278 0 0 49944 

============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ 0 220016 1833155 59995 179998 456455 

Tabl,~s 197 

SELECTED SERIES OF U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PUBLICA710NS 

Periodicals 

Earthquakes & Volcanoes (issued bimonthly). 

Preliminary Determination of Epicenters (issued monthly). 

Technical Books and Reports 

Professional Papers are mainly comprehensive scientific reports 

of wide and lasting interest and importance to professional scientists 

and engineers. Included are reports on the results of resource studies 

and of topographic, hydrologic, and geologic investigations. They also 

include collections of related papers addressing different aspects of a 

single scientific topic. 

Bulletins contain significant data and interpretations that are of 

lasting scientific interest but are generally more limited in scope or 

geographic coverage than Professional Papers. They include the results 

of resource studies and of geologic and topographic investigations, as 

well as collections of short papers related to a specific topic. 

Water-Supply Papers are comprehensive reports that present 

significant interpretive results of hydrologic investigations of wide 

interest to professional geologists, hydrologists, and engineers. The 

series covers investigations in all phases of hydrology, including 

hydrogeology, availability of water, quality of water, and use of water. 

Circulars present administrative information or important scientific information of wide popular interest in a format designed for 

distribution at no cost to the public. Information is usually of short-term 

interest. 

Water-Resources Investigations Reports are papers of an 

interpretive nature made available to the public outside the formal 

USGS publications series. Copies are reproduced on request unlike 

formal USGS publications, and they are also available for public 

inspection at depositories indicated in USGS catalogs. 

Open-Flle Reports include unpublished manuscript reports, 

maps, and other material that are made available for public consultation 

at depositories. They are a nonpermanent form of publication that may 

be cited in other publications as sources of information. 

Maps 

Geologic Quadrangle Maps are multicolor geologic maps on 

topographic bases in 7.5- or 15-minute quadrangle formats (scales 

mainly 1:24,000 or 1:62,500) showing bedrock, surficial, or engineering geology. Maps generally include brief texts; some maps include 

structure and columnar sections only. 

Geophysical Investigations Maps are on topographic or planimetric bases at various scales; they show results of surveys using 

geophysical techniques, such as gravity, magnetic, seismic, or radioactivity, which reflect subsurface structures that are of economic or 

geologic significance. Many maps include correlations with the geology. 

Miscellaneous Investigations Series Maps are on planimetric or 

topographic bases of regular and irregular areas at various scales; they 

present a wide variety of format and subject matter. The series also 

includes 7 .5-minute quadrangle photogeologic maps on planimetric 

bases that show geology as interpreted from aerial photographs. Series 

also includes maps of Mars and the Moon. 

Coal Investigations Maps are geologic map< on topographic or 

planimetric bases at various scales showing bedrock or surficial 

geology, stratigraphy, and structural relations in certain coal-resource 

areas. 

Oil and Gas Investigations Charts show stratigraphic information for certain oil and gas fields and other area..~ having petroleum 

potential. 

Miscellaneous Field Studies Maps are multicolor or blackand-white maps on topographic or planimetric bas~~ on quadrangle or 

irregular areas at various scales. Pre-1971 maps shc•v bedrock geology 

in relation to specific mining or mineral-deposit p'"()blems; post-1971 

maps are primarily black-and-white maps on vario·ls subjects such as 

environmental studies or wilderness mineral invesf1ations. 

Hydrologic Investigations Atlases are multicolored or blackand-white maps on topographic or planimetric base~ presenting a wide 

range of geohydrologic data of both regular and irregular areas; 

principal scale is 1:24,000, and regional studies arc:: at 1:250,000 scale 

or smaller. 

Catalogs 

Permanent catalogs, as well as some others, giving comprehensive listings of U.S. Geological Survey publications are available under 

the conditions indicated below from the U.S. C'.reological Survey, 

Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, 

Denver, CO 80225. (See latest Price and Availability List.) 

''Publications of the Geological Survey, 1879-1961" may be 

purchased by mail and over the counter in paperback book form and as 

a set of microfiche. 

''Publications of the Geological Survey, 1"~2-1970" may be 

purchased by mail and over the counter in paperback book form and as 

a set of microfiche. 

''Publications of the U.S. Geological Surv£117, 1971-1981" may 

be purchased by mail and over the counter in paperb"'ck book form (two 

volumes, publications listing and index) and as a s-~t of microfiche. 

Supplements for 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, and for subsequent years since the last permanent catalog mry be purchased by 

mail and over the counter in paperback book form. 

State catalogs, "List of U.S. Geological Survey Geologic and 

Water-Supply Reports and Maps For (State)," rray be purchased by 

mail and over the counter in paperback booklet form only. 

"Price and Availability List of U.S. GeolMical Survey Publications," issued annually, is available free of c"'arge in paperback 

booklet form only. 

Selected copies of a monthly catalog ''New Publications of the 

U.S. Geological Survey" are available free of cha-:ge by mail or may 

be obtained over the counter in paperback bookie~ form only. Those 

wishing a free subscription to the monthly catalog "New Publications of 

the U.S. Geological Survey" should write to the U.S. Geological 

Survey, 582 National Center, Reston, VA 22092. 

Note. -Prices of Government publications listed in older catalogs, announcements, and publications may be incorrect. Therefore, 

the prices charged may differ from the prices in catalogs, announcements, and publications.