Name: Paul Sumal

Title: Environmental Officer

Company: Rio Bravo Jasmin

Sign Date: 8/7/2010

Name: Stafford D. Pease

Title: Vice President

Company: Delta air Quality Services, Inc.

Sign Date: 8/7/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 1 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Facility Information:

Rio Bravo Jasmin

11258 Porterville Hwy

Bakersfield CA 93308

Contact: Paul Sumal

Phone: 661-393-2278

Fax: 661-792-2812

Email: psumal@rbjasmin.com

Testing Company:

Delta Air Quality Services, Inc.

1845 N. Case St

Orange CA 92865

Contact: Stafford D. Pease

Phone: 714 279 6777

Fax:

Email: Staffordpease@deltaaqs.com

Air Permit Number:

S-1751-3-13

Permitted Source ID/Name:

10768 Rio Bravo Jasmin

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

417.8 tn/dy

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

17.4 tn/hr

Target Process Test Rate

13 tn/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

The cogeneration facility consists of a fluidized bed combustor/boiler and ancillary equipment and a 36 megawatt 

electric generator. The boiler utilizes a baghouse and lime injection for the control of particulate matter and sulfur 

oxides and selective non-catalytic reduction for the control of nitrogen oxides.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

AFS #: 06029S1751 FRS #: 110000481675

SCC / Description 10100218 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustion: Circulating Bed (Bitum. Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Regulation Description Compound Limit Unit

Section 114 Carbon Monoxide 0 lb/million BTU 

using O2

Section 114 Carbon Monoxide 0 ppm corrected

Section 114 Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Methane

0 lb/million BTU 

using O2

section 114 Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Methane

0 ppm corrected

section 114 O2 0 percent(%)

section 114 CO2 0 percent(%)

section 114 Formaldehyde 0 lb/million BTU 

using O2

section 114 Formaldehyde 0 ppm corrected

section 114 methane 0 lb/million BTU 

using O2

section 114 methane 0 ppm corrected

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 2 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

n/a

Test Parameter Information:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

stack 93 0 0 0 8 2 4 12

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

stack Custom methane 3 120 0

stack Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0

stack Formaldehyde Method 0011 3 120 0

Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Methane

stack Method 25A 3 120 0

stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0

stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 3 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location stack - Method 0011

Average

Run Number 1-Form 2-Form 3-Form

Test Date 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 4/27/2010

Run Start Time 8:00:00 AM 10:32:00 

AM

12:56:00 PM

Run Finish Time 10:10:00 AM 12:34:00 

PM

2:56:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 120 120 120

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 81.109 82.545 80.966 81.540

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.52 7.17 6.59 7.427

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Carbon Dioxide, % 14.8 14.87 14.88 14.850

Oxygen, % 4.74 4.79 4.72 4.750

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 269.25 272.17 272.25 271.223

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 97,155.1 97,510.6 96,469.6 97,045.100

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 150,095.1 149,047.8 146,557.1 148,566.667

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 101.6 101.167

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9655 9700 9681 9,678.667

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location stack - Method 10

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 4 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Location stack - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 5 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Location stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 6 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: stack - Method 0011

Compound: Formaldehyde

Average

RunNumber 1-Form 2-Form 3-Form

Mass_mg 0.00682 0.00732 0.00612 0.007

lb/mmBtuO2 2.31E-06 2.46E-06 2.08E-06 0.000

ppm 2.38E-03 2.51E-03 2.14E-03 0.002

ppm@7%O2 2.05E-03 2.17E-03 1.84E-03 0.002

Location: stack - Method 10

Compound: Carbon Monoxide

Average

Run 1-co 2-co 3-co

lb/mmBtuO2 5.23E-02 5.24E-02 5.18E-02 0.052

ppm 5.76E+01 5.73E+01 5.70E+01 57.300

ppm@7%O2 4.95E+01 4.94E+01 4.90E+01 49.300

Location: stack - Method 25A

Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as 

Average

Run 1-voc 2-voc 3-voc

lb/mmBtuO2 6.45E-04 7.02E-04 7.20E-04 0.001

ppm 1.24E+00 1.34E+00 1.38E+00 1.320

ppm@7%O2 1.07E+00 1.16E+00 1.19E+00 1.140

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 7 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Bituminous Coal Burned 13.4 Tons 13.5

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 13.3 Tons 13.5

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 13.4 Tons 13.5

1 nh3 inj 127.5 lb/hr 140

2 nh3 inj 138.4 lb/hr 140

3 nh3 inj 135.9 lb/hr 140

1 lime inj 8.49 klb/hr 8

2 lime inj 7.87 klb/hr 8

3 lime inj 7.87 klb/hr 8

1 mwatts 35.4 mw 36

2 mwatts 35.4 mw 36

3 mwatts 35.3 mw 36

1 steam flow 277 klb/hr 280

2 steam flow 277 klb/hr 280

3 steam flow 276.9 klb/hr 280

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 BAGHOUSE 6.4 "WC 6

2 BAGHOUSE 6.4 "WC 6

3 BAGHOUSE 6.4 "WC 6

1 SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION 

FOR NOX

127.5 lb/hr 140

2 SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION 

FOR NOX

138.4 lb/hr 140

3 SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION 

FOR NOX

135.9 lb/hr 140

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 higher heating value 13073 btu/lb

2 higher heating value 12956 btu/lb

3 higher heating value 13010 btu/lb

1 moisture 8.2 %

2 moisture 8.5 %

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 8 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

3 moisture 8.4 %

1 mercury 0.05 ppm

2 mercury 0.05 ppm

3 mercury 0.05 ppm

1 total selected metals 52 ppm

2 total selected metals 51 ppm

3 total selected metals 41 ppm

1 chlorine 380 ppm

2 chlorine 380 ppm

3 chlorine 320 ppm

1 fluorine 75 ppm

2 fluorine 75 ppm

3 fluorine 90 ppm

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 9 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location stack - Method 0011

Average

Run Number 1-Form 2-Form 3-Form

Test Date 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 4/27/2010

Run Start Time 8:00:00 AM 10:32:00 AM 12:56:00 PM

Run Finish Time 10:10:00 AM 12:34:00 PM 2:56:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 13 13 13

Net Run Time, minutes 120 120 120

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.244 0.246 0.244 0.245

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.15 29.15 29.15 29.150

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.93 1.91 1.85 1.897

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 83.120 86.290 85.310 84.907

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 70.79 81.42 85.63 79.280

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 81.109 82.545 80.966 81.540

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 160.5 135.6 121.4 139.167

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.55 6.38 5.71 6.547

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.52 7.17 6.59 7.427

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000

Dry Mole Fraction 0.9148 0.9283 0.9341 0.926

Carbon Dioxide, % 14.8 14.87 14.88 14.850

Oxygen, % 4.74 4.79 4.72 4.750

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.46 80.34 80.4 80.400

Fuel Factor 1.09 1.08 1.09

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.56 30.57 30.57 30.567

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.49 29.67 29.74 29.633

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.200

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.24 29.24 29.24 29.240

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 269.25 272.17 272.25 271.223

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.6448348760

5664

0.637191178

525731

0.617411859

715059

0.633

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 53.03 52.66 51.78 52.490

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 47.173 47.173 47.173 47.173

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 97,155.1 97,510.6 96,469.6 97,045.100

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 150,095.1 149,047.8 146,557.1 148,566.667

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 101.6 101.167

Percent Excess Air, % 28.7 29.2 28.6 28.833

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9655 9700 9681 9,678.667

Round Duct Diameter, inches 93 93 93

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 10 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Location stack - Method 10

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 11 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Location stack - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 12 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Location stack - Method 3A CO2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 13 of 14
2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

8/7/2010

Location stack - Method 3A O2

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 14 of 14