alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-128118, 333-118348, 333-106282, 333-101536,
333-69696, 333-45094, 333-83153, 333-58555, 333-29567, 333-02289, and 033-58489 of 4Kids
Entertainment, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 13, 2006, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2005.


/s/ Eisner LLP


New York, New YorkMarch
15, 2006
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Heritage of Eagles Air Museum

Preserving History Through Education 7000 Merrill Avenue Suite 19 Chino, California 91710 Phone (909) 597 - 4020 FAX (909 393 - 0074 October 19, 2015 The Rules Docket (AGC - 200) Federal Aviation Administration 800 I ndependence Avenue SW Wa shington, DC. 20591

**Re: Petition for Exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations 91.315, 119.5(g), and 119.21(a) for the Operation of the**  **Heritage of Eagles Air Museum North American B**  **- 25 aircraft.** 

To W hom It May Concern: The Heritage of Eagles Air Museum currently holds FAA Exemption No. 8744E to allow Living History Flights (an LHFE). The museum wishes to renew this exemption , which expires on November 30, 2015, for the o peration of the Heritage of Eagles Air Museum 's North American B - 25 aircraft. Very Truly yours,

Carl W . Scholl President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigations Nos. 701-TA-318 (Review) and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Review)] 

## Determinations 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 1999 (64 FR 53412, October 1, 1999) and determined on January 7, 2000 that it would conduct expedited reviews (65 FR 2645, January 18, 2000). The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on May 18, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3301 (May 2000), entitled Sulfanilic Acid From China and India: Investigations Nos. 701-TA-318 (Review) and 731-TA-538 and 561 (Review). 

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke, 

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-13268 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      SIENA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                               CORPORATE STRUCTURE
                                  JUNE 30, 2000



     The consolidated structure of the Company is set forth in the following
table which identifies each corporate entity's subsidiaries and shows the state
of incorporation in which each of SHI and its subsidiaries are incorporated.
Each entity is headquartered at 5068 West Plano Parkway, Suite 300, in Plano,
Texas.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                     State of
Corporation                                                                                       Incorporation
-----------                                                                                       -------------

<S>                                                                                                <C>
Siena Holdings, Inc. (formerly Lomas Financial Corporation)(1).....................................  Delaware
    Siena Information Systems, Inc (formerly Lomas Information Systems)............................  Nevada
    Siena Management, Inc. (formerly Lomas Management, Inc.).......................................  Nevada
    Siena Properties, Inc. (formerly Lomas Properties, Inc.).......................................  Texas
        Siena Investment Properties, Inc. (formerly Lomas Investment Properties, Inc.).............  Nevada
    Siena Housing Management Corp. (formerly Lomas Housing Management Corp.).......................  Texas
    LLG Lands, Inc.................................................................................  Arkansas

</TABLE>

Notes to Table of Corporate Structure:
(1)  Unless otherwise stated, each affiliated entity is a corporation and is 100
     percent owned by the indicated parent company.
###### Editorial Note on Part 6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 6.1 Applicability of rules.

This part provides the rules of practice for administrative proceedings under the Service Contract Act, the Davis-Bacon Act and related statutes listed in § 5.1 of part 5 of this title which require payment of wages determined in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, and the Copeland Act. See parts 4 and 5 of this title.
(78 South. 991)

#### SMITH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

(6 Div. 479.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 18, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Charles W. Ferguson, Judge.

W. H. Sadler, Jr., of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Population and Prevelance /
              - 1.5 Civilians Ages 5-17 Years Living in the Community for the U.S. by Disability Status

## Table 1.5: Civilians Ages Five to 17 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 269 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 269

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
      Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a 
commemorative postage stamp be issued in honor of former United States 
                     Representative Barbara Jordan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2007

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Menendez, Mr. 
Specter, Mr. Levin, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Obama, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Durbin, 
  Mr. Biden, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Boxer, and Ms. Landrieu) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
             on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Citizens' Stamp Advisory 
      Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that a 
commemorative postage stamp be issued in honor of former United States 
                     Representative Barbara Jordan.

Whereas, in 1966, Barbara Jordan became the first African American since 1883 to 
        serve in the Texas Senate, where she served with distinction until 1972;
Whereas Barbara Jordan became the first African American United States 
        Representative from Texas when she won election to represent Texas's 
        18th District in the United States House of Representatives in 1972;
Whereas, from 1979 to 1996, Barbara Jordan served as a distinguished professor 
        at the University of Texas Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, 
        where she also held the Lyndon B. Johnson Centennial Chair in National 
        Policy;
Whereas President Bill Clinton awarded Barbara Jordan the Presidential Medal of 
        Freedom, the Nation's highest civilian honor, in August 1994; and
Whereas Barbara Jordan was a pioneer whose devotion to civil rights for all 
        people in the United States resonates to this day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Citizens' 
Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General 
that a commemorative postage stamp be issued in honor of former United 
States Representative Barbara Jordan.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 23.03

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in LG&E Energy Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997 of our report dated January 26, 1998 relating to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of KU Energy Corporation which is
incorporated by reference in the Form 10-K of LG&E Energy Corp. for the year
ended December 31, 1997, into LG&E Energy Corp.'s previously filed
Registration Statement No. 333-43985 relating to the LG&E Energy Corp.'s
Savings Plan and the 401(K) Savings Plan for Employees of the Louisville Gas
and Electric Company who are represented by Local 2100 of IBEW,
Post-Effective Amendment No. One to Registration Statement No. 33-56942 and
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1-C to Registration Statement No. 33-33687
relating to the Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan of
LG&E Energy Corp., Registration Statement No. 333-05457 and Post-Effective
Amendment No. 2-C to Registration Statement No. 33-33687 relating to the
Employee Common Stock Purchase Plan of LG&E Energy Corp., Registration
Statement No. 333-05459 and Post-Effective Amendment No. Two to Registration
Statement No. 33-38557 relating to the Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan of
LG&E Energy Corp., Post-Effective Amendment No. One to Registration Statement
No. 33-56525 relating to the Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of
LG&E Energy Corp., and Post-Effective Amendment No. One to Registration
Statement No. 33-60765 relating to the Deferred Stock Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of LG&E Energy Corp.

                                                 Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1998
EPA Research provides basis for improving the

suite of assays and models to advance chemical

prioritization and screening

The universe of chemicals passesthrough each version of the HTP/in silico

pipeline to evaluate chemicals in refined

tests, for new pathways, to evaluate,improve, and validate methods.

Building Confidence: “Learn by Doing”Phase 1: Incorporates HTP/in silico prioritization methodsPhase 2: Run subset of current T1S assays indicated by HTP and in silico predictions

Phase 3: Full replacement of EDSP T1S Battery

ChemicalsOf RegulatoryInterest

in vitro HTP/ in silico

Current EDSP

Near‐Term Test+ T1S BatteryPHASE 1

WOE‐

in vitro HTP/ in silico in vitro/in silico to target EDSP T1S Intermediate –Term Test+ PHASE 2 

WOE‐

in vitro HTP/ in silico

(full replacement of Tier 1 battery)

Longer‐TermPHASE 3

WOE‐
(75 South. 1005)

#### FERLISI v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

(6 Div. 309.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from Criminal Court, Jefferson County; H. P. Heflin, Judge.

M. M. Ullman, of Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Advanced Technical Products, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-19759) on Form S-8 of Lunn Industries, Inc. of our report dated march 20,
1998, except as to Note B, which is as of March 31, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Advanced Technical Products, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1997 and the related consolidated statements of income and
cash flows for the year then ended, and all related schedules, which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced
Technical Products, Inc.

                                                  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 31, 1998
#### § 501.17 Concurrent actions.

OFLC has primary responsibility to make all determinations regarding the issuance, denial, or revocation of a labor certification as described in 20 CFR part 655, subpart B, and § 501.1(b). WHD has primary responsibility to make all determinations regarding the enforcement functions as described in § 501.1(c). The taking of any one of the actions referred to above shall not be a bar to the concurrent taking of any other action authorized by 8 U.S.C. 1188, 20 CFR part 655, subpart B, or this part. OFLC and WHD have concurrent jurisdiction to impose a debarment remedy pursuant to 20 CFR 655.182 and § 501.20.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20196]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. N2011-1; Order No. 778]


Postal Service Initiative on Retail Postal Locations

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Regulatory Commission published a notice in the 
Federal Register of August 4, 2011 concerning a Postal Service request 
for an advisory opinion on an initiative involving examination of the 
continuation of service at postal retail locations. The procedural 
schedule included an incorrect date for the close of discovery on the 
Postal Service's direct case.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
202-789-6820 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77040312071f121959041f1605111a16193707051459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b282f3e2b333e357528333a293d363a351b2b2938753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 4, 2011, FR Doc. 2011-19725, on 
page 47276, in the Procedural Schedule table appearing after the 
signature block, correct the second line in the left-hand column to 
read:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 30, 2011                         Close of discovery on Postal
                                         Service direct case.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: August 4, 2011.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20196 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 779.243 Goods that have been “produced for commerce by any person.”

An employee will be considered to be handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods that have been “produced for commerce by any person” within the meaning of section 3(s), if he is performing the described activities with respect to goods which have been “produced for commerce” within the meaning of the Act. The term “produced” is defined in section 3(j) of the Act and, as explained above, has a well-established meaning under the existing law. (See § 779.104 and part 776 of this chapter.) The word as it is used in the context of the phrase “goods * * * produced for commerce by any person” in section 3(s) has the same meaning as in 3(j). Therefore, where goods are considered “produced for commerce” within the meaning of section 3(j) of the Act they also will be considered “produced for commerce” within the meaning of section 3(s). A discussion of when goods are produced for commerce within the meaning of section 3(j) is contained in § 779.108. Of course, within the meaning of section 3(s), the goods will be considered “produced for commerce” when they are so produced “by any person.”
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 292 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 345
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 292

    Designating the week beginning September 9, 2007, as ``National 
                        Assisted Living Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2007

Mr. Crapo submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 6, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating the week beginning September 9, 2007, as ``National 
                        Assisted Living Week''.

Whereas the number of elderly and disabled citizens of the United States is 
        increasing dramatically;
Whereas assisted living is a long-term care service that fosters choice, 
        dignity, independence, and autonomy in the elderly and disabled across 
        the United States;
Whereas the National Center for Assisted Living created National Assisted Living 
        Week;
Whereas the theme of National Assisted Living Week 2007 is ``Legacies of Love''; 
        and
Whereas this theme highlights the privilege, value, and responsibility of 
        passing the legacies of the lives of the elderly and disabled of the 
        United States down through the generations that care for and love them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 9, 2007, as 
        ``National Assisted Living Week''; and
            (2) urges all people of the United States--
                    (A) to visit friends and loved ones who reside at 
                assisted living facilities; and
                    (B) to learn more about assisted living services, 
                including how assisted living services benefit 
                communities in the United States.

                                                       Calendar No. 345

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 292

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Designating the week beginning September 9, 2007, as ``National 
                        Assisted Living Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 6, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
Editorial Note on Part 1926
Editorial Notes: 1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

§ 1926.1432 Multiple-crane/derrick lifts—supplemental requirements. ( a ) *Plan development.* Before beginning a crane/derrick operation in which more than one crane/derrick will be supporting the load, the operation must be planned. The planning must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The plan must be developed by a qualified person.
( 2 ) The plan must be designed to ensure that the requirements of this subpart are met.
( 3 ) Where the qualified person determines that engineering expertise is needed for the planning, the employer must ensure that it is provided.
( b ) *Plan implementation.* ( 1 ) The multiple-crane/derrick lift must be directed by a person who meets the criteria for both a competent person and a qualified person, or by a competent person who is assisted by one or more qualified persons (lift director).
( 2 ) The lift director must review the plan in a meeting with all workers who will be involved with the operation.