alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 42.6 Enforcement strategy. ( a ) Each Regional Farm Labor Coordinated Enforcement Committee shall annually prepare, on a regional basis, a migrant farm labor enforcement strategy for each protective statute pursuant to § 42.20(c)(3). The National Committee shall review these regional strategies and make recommendations to the appropriate DOL agencies. In reviewing the enforcement strategies, the Committee shall pay particular attention to: ( 1 ) The priorities set for the investigation and enforcement activities of compliance officers.
( 2 ) Available data on the past and current levels of enforcement of the protective statutes in the region, including the data collected pursuant to § 42.21, infra.
( 3 ) The level of attention given to directed activity as distinguished from complaint-initiated compliance activities.
( 4 ) The capability of the agency to respond quickly and thoroughly under the strategy to emergencies involving violations of any of the protective statutes.
( 5 ) The level of priority given by the Office of the Solicitor to farm labor-related enforcement activities under the respective protective statutes.
( 6 ) The ability of agencies to respond quickly and effectively to resolve complaints.
( 7 ) The extent to which agencies follow through with appropriate remedies and sanctions.
( 8 ) The degree to which agencies coordinate and cooperate on a local and regional level.
( 9 ) Other activities of DOL agencies related to migrant farmworker enforcement.
#### § 779.12 Commerce.

*Commerce* as used in the Act includes interstate and foreign commerce. It is defined in section 3(b) of the Act to mean “trade, commerce, transportation, transmission or communication among the several States or between any State and any place outside thereof.” (For the definition of “State” see § 779.16.) The application of this definition and the kinds of activities which it includes are discussed at length in the interpretative bulletin on general coverage of the Act, part 776 of this chapter.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 21 

Recognizing the uncommon valor of Wesley Autrey of New York, New York. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2007 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the uncommon valor of Wesley Autrey of New 

York, New York. 

Whereas Wesley Autrey is a citizen of New York, New York; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey is a veteran of the United States 

Navy; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey has been a member in good standing 

of the Construction and General Building Laborers’ 

Local 79 since 1996; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey witnessed a fellow subway passenger 

suffer from a seizure and fall onto the train tracks; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey was compelled by his belief that he 

should ‘‘do the right thing’’ and serve as an example to 

his 2 young daughters; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SRES 21 IS 

Whereas Wesley Autrey demonstrated uncommon valor and 

tremendous bravery in diving onto the train tracks to 

save the life of his fellow subway passenger only moments 

before an incoming train passed over them; 

Whereas the beneficiary of Wesley Autrey’s courageous actions is now recovering at St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital 

Center, New York; 

Whereas Wesley Autrey has conducted himself with the utmost humility in the midst of his newfound fame; and 

Whereas Wesley Autrey stands out as an example of selflessness to members of his community, his State, and the 

Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes that Wesley Autrey acted hero3 ically by putting his own life at risk to save that of 

4 his fellow citizen; and 

5 (2) expresses its deep appreciation for Wesley 

6 Autrey’s example and the values that his actions 

7 represent. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Ron E. Hooper, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Marine Petroleum Trust for which Bank ofAmerica, N.A. acts as Trustee; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this annual report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent I considerreasonable on information provided to me by various working interest owners.   Date: September 27, 2005 /s/ RON E. HOOPER     Ron E. Hooper  Senior Vice President Royalty Management on  behalf of Bank of America Private Bank, not in  its individual capacity but solely as trustee of  Marine Petroleum Trust
-24-
1

Pallarino, Bob

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:38 AM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; Christiansen, Steven H CIV NAVFAC HI, PRP41; Linder, 

Steven; Pallarino, Bob; Lovgren, Andrew C LCDR, NAVSUP FLCPH C700; Kishaba, Raelynn I

CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Mizuno, Arleen M CIV 

NAVFAC HI, PRJ412; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - March 31, 2015

Signed By: aaron.poentis@navy.mil

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne: 

I apologize this is late, I was tied up all week. Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from 

Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic Center Pearl Harbor for the week of March 31, 2015. In a process to ease 

reading, only sections with changes will be annotated. 

1. Preliminary Work Plan 

Action complete. 

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable) 

a. Action 1 - Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation 

of release point(s) within Tank 5. 

Action complete. 

b. Action 2 - The rate of vertical migration for the released JP-8 free product is unknown. Information from the 

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to 

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP-8 releases of 10,000, 

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5. 

No change. 

c. Action 3 - Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of 

the released JP-8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased 

monitoring are required to address this plume. 

No change. 

d. Action 4 - Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future 

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete. 

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical. 

d.(1) Groundwater Monitoring Wells 

The Draft Monitoring Well Installation Report for RHMW06 and RHMW07 was submitted on March 26, 2015 to the DOH 

and EPA for review and comment. 
2

d.(2) Site Characterization 

No change. 

d.(3) AOC/SOW 

Discussions are ongoing. 

d.(4) Request for Additional Information 

No change. 

d.(5) BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study 

No change. 

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. 

v/r, 

Aaron
#### *Dupuy vs*Harris.

Error to the Mason Circuit.

Debt.

*Case*117.

The ease stated,

It is competent ^bLirupt’ina lfterasaMsthdis’ charge, upon his pleaded^to reply *535and show that it was fraudulently-obtained.

*534
      *Fraudulent Bankruptcy. Evidence.*

*June*24.

Chief Justice Ewing

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Dupuy brought suit on a note for $900, against Harris $ the latter pleaded his certificate of discharge in bankruptcy in bar; Dupuy replied fraud, with notice, as required by the act of Congress, The Circuit Court instructed the jury as in case of nonsuit, and Dupuy has appealed to this Court.

The instruction given cannot be sustained.

It appears in proof that Harris, on the 20th of May, 1842, made over his household effects and personal goods to Dupuy, and assigned him a bond on one Robertson, for a number of stoves, retaining the power to vend and pay over to Dupuy so much of the proceeds of sale as would pay his debt, and that early in June following, he filed his petition as a voluntary bankrupt, and returned an inventory of his effects and schedule of his debts, in which he made no mention or surrender of his interest in the bonds on Robertson, or of his household effects or personal goods. And further, that he afterwards received stoves on Roberson’s bond, made sale of them and applied the money to his own use,-before he obtained his discharge.

From these facts and others appearing in the record, the jury would have had the right to infer that Harris mac¡e die transfer and arrangement with Dupuy, in *can-^emP^a^on*°f becoming a voluntary bankrupt, and with the *intention and purpose*not only of giving a preference to a creditor, but of covering over and withholding from *535bis general creditors, and applying to his own use the interest retained. And if so, he was not only guilty of moral fraud, but fraud against the provisions of the bankrupt law, and being thus guilty, his certificate was a nullity and afforded no bar to the plaintiff’s right of action against him.

A certified copy of the inventory of a voluntary bankrupt, is competent evidence for plaintiff. If it has been amended defendant must show it.- -

*Waller*for plaintiff: *Hord*for defendant.

The inventory of Harris5' effects, rendered on his petition in bankruptcy, or a duly certified copy thereof, was competent as evidence against him, without the production of the entire record. It is a written statement of his effects surrendered, made out on oath, over his own signature, and is as competent evidence against him as his answer in chancery would be. If he has made any addition to his inventory or to the effects surrendered, it was competent for him to show it.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and cause remanded, that a new trial may be granted without the payment’of costs.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Joseph E. Macharsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)                            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)                            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to The Boyds Collection, Ltd. and will be retained by The BoydsCollection, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

 
| /s/ Joseph E. Macharsky |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Joseph E.  Macharsky    |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| August 14, 2003    |   |

 

1

----
#### § 2580.412-27 Exemption.

An exemption from the bonding requirements of subsections 13 (a) and (b) of the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act is granted whereby banking institutions and trust companies specified in § 2580.412-28 are not required to comply with subsections 13 (a) and (b) of the Act, with respect to welfare and pension benefit plans covered by the Act.

[34 FR 5158, Mar. 13, 1969. Redesignated at 50 FR 26706, June 28, 1985]
§ 551.2 Findings authorized by this part. ( a ) The Administrator, pursuant to the authority vested in him by the Secretary of Labor, will make and apply findings under section 13(b)(11) of the Act as provided in this part. Such findings shall be made only upon petitions meeting the requirements of this part, and only as authorized in this section.
( b ) For the purpose of establishing whether a wage payment plan has the purpose and effect required by section 13(b)(11) for an exemption from the overtime provisions of the Act, the Administrator shall have authority, upon a proper showing and in accordance with the provisions of this part, to make a finding as to the general purpose and effect of any specific plan of compensation on the basis of trip rates or other delivery payment plan, with respect to the reduction of the length of the workweeks worked by the employees of any specific employer who are compensated in accordance with such plan for their employment by such employer as drivers or drivers' helpers making local deliveries.
( c ) Any finding made as to the purpose and effect of such a wage payment plan pursuant to a petition therefor will be based upon a consideration of all relevant facts shown or represented to exist with respect to such plan that are made available to the Administrator. A finding that such plan has the general effect of reducing the hours worked by drivers or drivers' helpers compensated thereunder to, or below, the maximum workweek applicable to them under section 7(a) of the Act is not authorized under this part unless the Administrator finds that during the most recently completed representative period of one year (based on the experience of the employer in question, or if such employer has not previously used such plan, on the experience of another employer using such plan under substantially the same conditions, all as defined in § 551.8(g)(1)), the average weekly hours, taken in the aggregate, of all full-time employees covered by the plan are not in excess of the maximum workweek applicable to such employees under section 7(a), or unless the Administrator makes an interim finding with respect to such plan that, notwithstanding a lack of experience under it for a representative period of 1 year, its provisions and manner of operation, together with the other available information concerning the plan, indicate clearly that by the end of such first representative year the effect of the plan will have been to reduce the average weekly hours worked by the employees covered by the plan in such first year of operation to, or below, such maximum applicable workweek.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 24


                            THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.


                          DIRECTORS' POWER OF ATTORNEY
                          ----------------------------


     Each of the undersigned members of the Board of Directors of The Lamson &
Sessions Co., an Ohio corporation, which anticipates filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., an annual report of the Corporation
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002 ("2002 Form 10-K")
under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, does hereby
constitute and appoint James J. Abel and John B. Schulze, jointly and severally,
with full power and substitution and re-substitution, as attorney(s) to sign for
him and in his name, in the capacities indicated below, the 2002 Form 10-K,
including any amendments and exhibits thereto, with full power and authority to
do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever necessary and required to
be done in connection with such signing as fully to all intents and purposes as
he would do if personally present, hereby ratifying and approving the acts of
said attorney(s) and any substitutes(s) therefor in connection with such
signing:


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of the
18th day of February 2003.




/s/ James T. Bartlett                        /s/ John C. Dannemiller
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
James T. Bartlett                            John C. Dannemiller
Director                                     Director


/s/ Francis H. Beam, Jr.                     /s/ George R. Hill
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Francis H. Beam, Jr.                         George R. Hill
Director                                     Director


/s/ William H. Coquillette                   /s/ A. Malachi Mixon, III
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
William H. Coquillette                       A. Malachi Mixon, III
Director                                     Director


/s/ Martin J. Cleary                         /s/ D. Van Skilling
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Martin J. Cleary                             D. Van Skilling
Director                                     Director
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13212]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Indian Health Service


Mental Health and Community Safety Initiative for American 
Indian/Alaska Native Children, Youth and Families

AGENCY: Indian Health Service, HHS.

ACTION: Extension of Deadline for Receipt of Competitive Grant 
Applications for the Mental Health and Community Safety Initiative for 
American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Children, Youth, and Families.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Notice of funding availability for competitive grants for the 
mental health and community safety initiative for American Indian/
Alaska Native (AI/AN) children, youth, and families was published at 65 
FR 26841, on Tuesday, May 9, 2000.
    The Indian Health Service (IHS) announces the extension of the 
application receipt deadlines to June 15, 2000 for the following grant 
programs included in the above Notice:
    1. The AI/AN Mental Health Grants Program funded by the IHS and
    2. The Mental Health and Community Safety Initiative for American 
Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Children, Youth, and Families funded by 
the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS).
    This extension to June 15, 2000, provides applicants for both of 
these programs approximately an additional two weeks to prepare and 
submit competitive applications.
    All other information contained in the Federal Register 
announcement and in the consolidated grant application package 
distributed in early May remains unchanged.

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
Michael H. Trujillo,
Assistant Surgeon General, Director.
[FR Doc. 00-13212 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-16-M