alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,615)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,905
<PP&E>                                          19,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,892
<BONDS>                                         13,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           885
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,725
<SALES>                                         90,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,234
<CGS>                                           54,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,586)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.76)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2022

FELICIA D. SLIGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General; UNITED

STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge.

(CA-96-3028-Y)

Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: October 24, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felicia D. Sligh, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Albert David Copperthite, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's

claims of racial discrimination, retaliatory discharge, and lack of

union representation. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sligh v. Runyon, No.

CA-96-3028-Y (D. Md. June 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March 31, 2010 |   | /s/ Gregory P. Anderson  |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|           |   | Name:                         | Gregory P. Anderson |
|           |   | Title:                        | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 212 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 212

  To express the sense of the Senate relating to legislation to curb 
                            global warming.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2007

  Mr. Coleman (for himself and Mr. Lieberman) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To express the sense of the Senate relating to legislation to curb 
                            global warming.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any 
comprehensive, mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reduction program 
enacted by Congress should include--
            (1) periodic determinations of the extent to which other 
        countries that are major contributors of atmospheric greenhouse 
        gas concentrations have established for those countries 
        emissions reduction programs that are comparable in 
        effectiveness to the program established by the United States;
            (2) in the event of an authoritative determination that the 
        emissions reduction programs established by other countries 
        that are major contributors of atmospheric greenhouse gas 
        concentrations are substantially less effective than the 
        program established by the United States, consequences in the 
        form of--
                    (A) a review of provisions of the emissions 
                reduction program established by the United States; or
                    (B) 1 or more changes to other policies of the 
                United States;
            (3) periodic determinations relating to whether the 
        emissions reduction program established by the United States is 
        increasing the rate of poverty or unemployment in the United 
        States;
            (4) in the event of an authoritative determination that the 
        emissions reduction program established by the United States is 
        increasing the rate of poverty or unemployment in the United 
        States, a process of review of provisions of the emissions 
        reduction program established by the United States; and
            (5) in addition to the imposition of limits relating to the 
        emission of greenhouse gases, effective incentives for private 
        entities that sell electricity to increase the percentage of 
        sales by the entities of electricity that is generated by clean 
        energy sources.
                                 <all>
```
September 21, 2015 

Dear Mr. Stockton: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−0886). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 10/5/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 326 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Day of Remembrance for 

Murder Victims. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. KYL) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Day of 

Remembrance for Murder Victims. 

Whereas the death of a loved one is a devastating experience, 

and the murder of a loved one is exceptionally difficult; 

Whereas the friends and families of murder victims cope with 

grief through a variety of support services, including 

counseling, crisis intervention, professional referrals, and 

assistance in dealing with the criminal justice system; 

and 

Whereas the designation of a National Day of Remembrance 

for Murder Victims on September 25 of each year provides an opportunity for the people of the United States 

to honor the memories of murder victims and to recognize the impact on surviving family members: Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 326 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of a National 

3 Day of Remembrance for Murder Victims; and 

4 (2) recognizes the significant benefits offered by 

5 the organizations that provide services to the loved 

6 ones of murder victims. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 15 

Electing David J. Schiappa of Maryland as Secretary for the Minority of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Electing David J. Schiappa of Maryland as Secretary for 

the Minority of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That David J. Schiappa of Maryland be, 

2 and he is hereby, elected Secretary for the Minority of the 

3 Senate. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 780.520 Particular operations which may be exempt. ( a ) *General.* Section 13(a)(14) lists a number of operations as being included in the processing of shade-grown tobacco. Some of these are, and others are not, themselves “processing” in the sense that performance of the operations changes the natural form of the commodity on which it is performed. All of the operations named and described in paragraph (b) of this section, however, are a necessary and integral part of the overall process of preparing shade-grown tobacco for use as cigar wrapper tobacco and, when performed as part of that process and prior to stemming of the tobacco, by an employee qualified under the terms of the section, will provide the basis for his exemption from the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Act.
( b ) *Particular operations* — ( 1 ) *Drying.* Drying includes the removal or lowering of the moisture content of the tobacco, whether by natural means or by exposure to heat from ovens, furnaces, etc.
( 2 ) *Curing.* Curing includes removing the tobacco to the curing shed or barn and stringing the tobacco over slats.
( 3 ) *Fermenting.* Fermenting includes the operations controlling the chemical changes which take place in the tobacco as the result of bulking and rebulking.
( 4 ) *Bulking.* Bulking includes piling the tobacco in piles or bulks of about 4,000 pounds each for the purpose of fermenting the tobacco.
( 5 ) *Rebulking.* Rebulking includes the breaking down of the tobacco bulks or piles and rearranging them so that the tobacco on the inside will be placed on the outside of the bulk and tobacco on the outside will be placed inside.
( 6 ) *Sorting.* Sorting includes segregation of the tobacco leaves in connection with the grading and classifying of the cured tobacco.
( 7 ) *Grading.* Grading includes sorting or classifying as to size and quality.
( 8 ) *Aging.* Aging includes the curing process brought about by bulking.
( 9 ) *Baling.* Baling includes the tying of the tobacco into “hands” and placing them in bales for shipment.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Purchase
agreement


 


Royal
Bakery Holdings Inc. (the seller) does hereby sell, assign and transfer to Parc Valencia LLC (the buyer) of:


 


Patents,
trademarks Brand name of Ovo Café


 


The
Seller warrants that all patents, trademarks, trade names, brand names design and copyrights owned by, used by Seller are valid
and in good standing and free and clear of all security interests, liens, encumbrances and other burdens and have not been and
are not now being challenged in any way or involved in any pending or threatened interference proceeding.


 


The
Seller further agrees to release and forever transfer the trade mark (Ovo Café brand) to the Buyer. The Buyer agrees to
pay Royal Bakery Holdings $2,500 for the trademark transfer and release.


 


This
Agreement is being delivered and is intended to be performed in the State of California and shall be governed by and construed
and enforced in accordance with the laws of said State.


 


	Royal
    Bakery Holdings, Inc.	 	Parc
    Valencia LLC
	 	 	 
	                                                                                         	 	                                                                                         
	Name: 	 	Name:
	Title:                                                                                	 	Title:                                                                                
	Date:                                                                               	 	Date:
Certifications Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The annual report on form 10-K of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. for the year
ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the above-mentioned report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ADC
Telecommunications, Inc.
 /s/ Robert E. SwitzRobert E. Switz November 20, 2009/s/ James G. MathewsJames G. Mathews November 20, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ending April 30, 2003, I, D. Michael Parker,
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  such Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2003,
          fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Form 10-K of the Company for the
          period ended April 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.

Date:  July 23, 2003


                                          By:      /s/ D. Michael Parker
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                     D. Michael Parker
                                             Senior Vice President, Finance and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
[671 NE2d 1268, 648 NYS2d 871]

#### Robert L. Davis et al., Appellants, v Naomi Klein, as Executrix of the Estate of Lawrence A. Klein, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Decided September 17, 1996

*1009APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria,*Buffalo *(John A. Collins*of counsel), for appellants.

*DAmato & Lynch,*New York City *(Stephen F. Willig*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff Robert Davis retained the defendant law firm in March 1987 to represent and appear for him in all proceedings concerning a workers’ compensation claim arising out of an accident which occurred on property allegedly owned by the City of New York. In 1988, plaintiff’s case was allegedly referred by the defendant attorney to another lawyer in the same firm for discussion on commencing a third-party action against the City. Plaintiff was informed at that time that his claim against the City was barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Plaintiff’s workers’ compensation claim was resolved and no further action with respect to the claim against the City was taken until 1991, when plaintiff and his spouse commenced this legal malpractice action. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants committed malpractice by failing to timely institute an action against the City as owner of the property where the accident occurred pursuant to Labor Law §§ 200, 240, 241 (6) and common-law negligence principles. Defendants moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court granted defendants’ motion and dismissed the complaint. The Appellate Division, with one Justice dissenting, affirmed.

In order to establish a prima facie case of legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action but for the at*1010torney’s negligence *(see, Carmel v Lunney,*70 NY2d 169, 173; *Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. Co.,*64 NY2d 419, 425; *Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine,*59 AD2d 551, 553, *affd*45 NY2d 730, 732). Plaintiffs’ unsupported allegations that the City owned the property in question failed to raise material issues of fact with respect to their underlying claims against the City, and the complaint was properly dismissed.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Airports Council International-North America, Department of 

Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 Section
        906 Certification
 
 
 The
        following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form
        10-Q of
        the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The
        undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
        (15
        U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of
        the MLM Index TM Fund.
 
 November
        5, 2007
 
 
 /s/
                  Timothy J. RudderowTimothy J. RudderowPresidentMount
                  Lucas Management Corporation,the
                  manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wizzard Software Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, President, CEO and Treasurer
and Gordon Berry, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated: August 14, 2006     Signature:     /s/ Christopher J. Spencer
                                          --------------------------
                                          Christopher J. Spencer
                                          President, CEO and Treasurer

Dated: August 14, 2006     Signature:     /s/ Gordon Berry
                                          --------------------------
                                          Gordon Berry
                                          Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 15











Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549



Commissioners:



We are aware that our report dated July 27, 2007 on our review of interim financial statements of LCNB Corp. and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), as of and for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended, is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-8, filed on March 13, 2003.  Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.







/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.



J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.





Cincinnati, Ohio

July 27, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, MarkJ. Ferrer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial positionand result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Mark J. Ferrer                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Mark J. Ferrer                        |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 13, 2003                       |

 

 

Signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Vastera, Inc. and will be retainedby Vastera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----