alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2201.9 Waiver of fees. ( a ) *General.* The FOIA Disclosure Officer shall waive part or all of the fees assessed under § 2201.8(b) if two conditions are satisfied: Disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government; and disclosure is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. Where the FOIA Disclosure Officer has reasonable cause to doubt the use to which a requester will put the records sought, or where that use is not clear from the request itself, the FOIA Disclosure Officer may seek clarification from the requester before assigning the request to a specific category for fee assessment purposes. The FOIA Disclosure Officer shall afford the requester the opportunity to show that the requester comes within these two conditions. The following factors may be considered in determining whether the two conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) Whether the subject of the requested records concerns the operations or activities of the government;
( 2 ) Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of government operations or activities;
( 3 ) Whether the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the requested disclosure; and, if so, whether the magnitude of the identified commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.
( b ) *Partial waiver of fees.* If the two conditions stated in paragraph (a) of this section are met, the FOIA Disclosure Officer will ordinarily waive all fees. In exceptional cases, however, only a partial waiver may be granted if the request for records would impose an exceptional burden or require an exceptional expenditure of Commission resources, and the request for a waiver minimally satisfies the “public interest” requirement in paragraph (a) of this section.
[71 FR 56350, Sept. 27, 2006. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 95038, 95039, Dec. 27, 2016]
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            -------------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  --------------------------------------------


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Troy
Financial Corporation (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to his
knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending June 30, 2002 filed on
     the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b)  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
     Company.


                             /s/ Daniel J. Hogarty, Jr.
                             ---------------------------------------------
                              Daniel J. Hogarty, Jr.
                              Chairman of the Board, President
                              and Chief Executive Officer
                              August 14, 2002


                             /s/ David J. DeLuca
                             -----------------------------------------------
                              David J. DeLuca
                              Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                              August 14, 2002


                                       23
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 190 

Expressing the condolences of the Nation to the community of Greensburg, 

Kansas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2007 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the condolences of the Nation to the community 

of Greensburg, Kansas. 

Whereas, on Friday, May 4, 2007, a tornado struck the community of Greensburg, Kansas; 

Whereas this tornado was classified as an EF–5, the strongest possible type, by the National Weather Service, with 

winds estimated at 205 miles per hour; 

Whereas the tornado is the first EF–5 on the Enhanced 

Fujita scale, and the first F–5 on the previous scale since 

1999; 

Whereas approximately 95 percent of Greensburg is destroyed; 

Whereas 1,500 residents have been displaced from their 

homes; and 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 190 ATS 

Whereas, in response to the declaration by the President of 

a major disaster, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency has made Federal disaster assistance available for the State of Kansas to assist in 

local recovery efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses the condolences 

2 of the Nation to the community of Greensburg, Kansas, 

3 and its gratitude to local, State, and National law enforce4 ment and emergency responders conducting search and 

5 rescue operations. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
§ 541.304 Practice of law or medicine. ( a ) The term “employee employed in a bona fide professional capacity” in section 13(a)(1) of the Act also shall mean: ( 1 ) Any employee who is the holder of a valid license or certificate permitting the practice of law or medicine or any of their branches and is actually engaged in the practice thereof; and
( 2 ) Any employee who is the holder of the requisite academic degree for the general practice of medicine and is engaged in an internship or resident program pursuant to the practice of the profession.
( b ) In the case of medicine, the exemption applies to physicians and other practitioners licensed and practicing in the field of medical science and healing or any of the medical specialties practiced by physicians or practitioners. The term “physicians” includes medical doctors including general practitioners and specialists, osteopathic physicians (doctors of osteopathy), podiatrists, dentists (doctors of dental medicine), and optometrists (doctors of optometry or bachelors of science in optometry).
( c ) Employees engaged in internship or resident programs, whether or not licensed to practice prior to commencement of the program, qualify as exempt professionals if they enter such internship or resident programs after the earning of the appropriate degree required for the general practice of their profession.
( d ) The requirements of § 541.300 and subpart G (salary requirements) of this part do not apply to the employees described in this section.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 26, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1485 Lower Tribunal No. 19-3150

________________ 

### Brenda Thompkins , Appellant, vs. 

### Condominium "E" Association At Mediterranea, Inc., etc. , Appellee. An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge. Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A., and Jennifer S. Carroll (Jupiter), for appellant. Esler & Lindie, P.A., Beth G. Lindie, and Jeremy M. Zubkoff (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.51

 

Montreal, February 7, 2014

 

VIA COURIER

 

Davids Tea Inc.

Jody Bessner, Lease Administrator

5430 Ferrier

TMR, QC H4P 1M2

 

RE:                        Storage Agreement Extension

1034 rue St-Jean, Quebec City, Quebec (the “Leased Premises”)

 

Dear Jody,

 

Further to your request, this Extension letter acknowledges that the Storage Agreement between Le Château Inc. (“Le Château”) and Davids Tea Inc. (“Davids Tea”) dated May 28, 2012 will be extended on a month-to-month basis, commencing on February 1, 2014.

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Storage Agreement, Le Château has the right to terminate the Storage Agreement and Extension thereof, for any reason whatsoever, upon a prior notice of seventy-two (72) hours given to Davids Tea Head Office.

 

If Le Château exercises the foregoing right of termination:

 

(i)                                        the Storage Term shall be deemed to expire on the date of termination specified in Le Château’s notice of termination (the “Termination Date”);

 

(ii)                                     Davids Tea shall execute and deliver an acknowledgment of termination in Le Château’s form and any other documentation that may be required by Le Chateau in order to give effect to the provisions of this right;

 

(iii)                              Davids Tea shall deliver vacant possession of the Leased Premises to Le Château upon the Termination Date in accordance with the terms of the Storage Agreement and any extensions thereof; and

 

(iv)                                 Davids Tea shall pay to Le Château all amounts of Rent due up to and including the Termination Date and all Rent shall be adjusted as of the Termination Date, all without any compensation, damages or indemnification of any kind from Le Château.

 

The parties hereto confirm that the Storage Agreement, as modified by this Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to subject matter hereof. All other terms and conditions of the Storage Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

 











 

	
Agreed and dated on February 7 , 2014
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
DAVIDS TEA INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Per:
    	
/s/ Howard Tafler
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Per:
    	
/s/ Dominic Choquette
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
I/We have the   authority to bind the company.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed and dated on February 14 , 2014
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
LE CHÂTEAU INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Per:
    	
/s/ Emilia Di Raddo
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Emelia Di Raddo, CA
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
President
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Per:
    	
/s/ Lee Albert
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Lee Albert
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Director, Real Estate
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
I/We have the authority   to bind the company.
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wizzard Software Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, President, CEO and Treasurer
of the Registrant, and Gordon Berry, CFO of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Date: 11/14/03                           /s/Christopher J. Spencer
                                         -------------------------
                                         Christopher J. Spencer
                                         President, CEO, Treasurer and
                                         director


Date: 11/14/03                           /s/Gordon Berry
                                         ---------------
                                         Gordon Berry
                                         CFO
Order entered October q , 2012 

In The 

Court of Rppeatti 

jfiftb 4Notrirt of Texao at attas 

No. 05-12-01323-CR 

ERIC JERMOND DAVIS, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 363rd District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-59063 

ORDER 

The Court GRANTS appellant's motion for extension of time to file defendant's notice 

of appeal and pauper's oath. We consider the notice of appeal filed in this Court on September 

27, 2012 timely filed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 11, 2010 

s0303 

Order 

 

March 11, 2010 

139429 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139429 

 COA: 279550 

Genesee CC: 06-018533-FC 

SHERMAN MARTINEZ BUGGS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### § 458.3 Application of LMRDA labor organization reporting requirements.

The reporting provisions of parts 402, 403, and 408 of this chapter shall apply to labor organizations subject to the requirements of the CSRA or FSA.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0188)

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 15116, Mar. 31, 1994; 63 FR 33780, June 19, 1998]
§ 500.262 Decision and order of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The Administrative Law Judge shall prepare, as promptly as practicable after the expiration of the time set for filing proposed findings and related papers a decision on the issues referred by the Secretary.
( b ) In cases involving certificate actions as described in § 500.224(b), the Administrative Law Judge shall issue a decision within ninety (90) calendar days after the close of the hearing.
( c ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall be limited to a determination whether the respondent has violated the Act or these regulations, and the appropriateness of the remedy or remedies imposed by the Secretary. The Administrative Law Judge shall not render determinations on the legality of a regulatory provision or the constitutionality of a statutory provision.
( d ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge, for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act (5 U.S.C. 504), shall be limited to determinations of attorney fees and/or other litigation expenses in adversary proceedings requested pursuant to § 500.212 which involve the modification, suspension or revocation of a Certificate of Registration issued under the Act and these Regulations, and/or the imposition of a civil money penalty assessed for a violation of the Act or these Regulations. The Administrative Law Judge shall have no power or authority to award attorney fees and/or other litigation expenses pursuant to the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act or Regulations issued thereunder in any proceeding under MSPA or these Regulations involving the refusal to issue or renew a Certificate of Registration.
( e ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall include a statement of findings and conclusions, with reasons and basis therefor, upon each material issue presented on the record. The decision shall also include an appropriate order which may be to affirm, deny, reverse, or modify, in whole or in part, the determination of the Secretary. The reason or reasons for such order shall be stated in the decision.
( f ) The Administrative Law Judge shall transmit to the Chief Administrative Law Judge the entire record including the decision. The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall serve copies of the decision on each of the parties.
( g ) The decision when served shall constitute the final order of the Secretary unless the Secretary, pursuant to section 103(b)(2) or section 503(b)(2) of the Act, modifies or vacates the decision and order of the Administrative Law Judge.
( h ) Except as provided in §§ 500.263 through 500.268, the administrative remedies available to the parties under the Act will be exhausted upon service of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge.
[48 FR 36741, Aug. 12, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 24866, May 16, 1996]
#### § 520.405 Must I notify my employees that I am applying for a certificate to employ messengers and/or learners at subminimum wages?

Upon making application for a messenger and/or learner certificate or for renewal thereof, an employer shall post a copy of the first page of the completed application form in a conspicuous place in each department of the plant or establishment where he/she proposes to employ messengers and/or learners at subminimum wage rates. Such notice shall remain posted until the application is acted upon by the Administrator.

(The information collection requirements contained herein were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1235-0001)

[62 FR 64959, Dec. 9, 1997, as amended at 82 FR 2228, Jan. 9, 2017]
§ 528.3 Withdrawal and annulment of certificates. ( a ) An authorized representative may withdraw a certificate from any employer within that representative's region who, acting under color of any certificate or application for the employment of learners, handicapped workers, student workers, student learners, apprentices, messengers, or full-time students in agriculture, retail, or service establishments, or in institutions of higher education at subminimum wages under section 14 of the act, fails to comply with the limitations in such certificate or otherwise violates the act.
( b ) An authorized representative may annul a certificate affected by mistake in its issuance if the employer knowingly induced or knowingly took advantage of the mistake. Where the employer did not knowingly induce the mistake but knowingly took advantage of it, a new certificate shall be issued by the authorized representative if, and on such terms as, such certificate would have been issued had there been no mistake limited in its term from the date of issuance to the date of annulment of the annulled certificate.
( c ) A certificate may be withdrawn in the public interest by a representative authorized to issue such type of certificate whenever any part of the exemption it provides is no longer necessary to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment. If appropriate, a more limited replacement certificate may be issued by the authorized representative.
(Secretary's Order No. 16-75, dated Nov. 25, 1975 (40 FR 55913); Employment Standards Order No. 76-2, dated Feb. 23, 1976 (41 FR 9016))
[43 FR 28469, June 30, 1978]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00072-CV

AMERICAN HOMEOWNER 

PRESERVATION, LLC AND JORGE 

NEWBERY, Appellants

V.

BRIAN J. PIRKLE, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 236th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (236-293606-17)

October 18, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order denying special appearances. It is ordered that 

the order of the trial court is affirmed, and we remand this case to the trial court for 

further proceedings.

It is further ordered that Appellants American Homeowner Preservation, LLC 

and Jorge Newbery shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution 

issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
AQUASITION CORP.



[________], 2012


 


Seacrest Shipping Co. Limited


8-10 Paul Street


London EC2A 4JH, England


 


Re: Administrative Services Agreement


 


Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the date the securities of Aquasition Corp. (the “Company”) are first quoted on the Nasdaq
Capital Market (the “Quoting Date”), pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form F-1 and prospectus
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”) and continuing until
the earlier of the consummation by the Company of an initial acquisition transaction or the Company’s liquidation (in each
case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Seacrest Shipping Co. Ltd. shall make available to the Company, at 8-10 Paul Street, London EC2A 4JH, England (or any successor
location of Seacrest Shipping Co. Ltd.), certain office space, utilities, secretarial and general and administrative services as
may be reasonably required by the Company. In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay Seacrest Shipping Co. Ltd. the sum of $7,500
per month on the Quoting Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date, with any payment in respect of a partial
month prorated.


 


This letter agreement constitutes the entire
agreement and understanding of the parties hereto in respect of its subject matter and supersedes all prior understandings, agreements,
or representations by or among the parties hereto, written or oral, to the extent they relate in any way to the subject matter
hereof or the transactions contemplated hereby. This letter agreement may not be amended, modified or waived as to any particular
provision, except by a written instrument executed by all parties hereto. No party hereto may assign either this letter agreement
or any of its rights, interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the other party. Any purported
assignment in violation of this paragraph shall be void and ineffectual and shall not operate to transfer or assign any interest
or title to the purported assignee.


 


This letter agreement, the entire relationship
of the parties hereto, and any litigation between the parties (whether grounded in contract, tort, statute, law or equity) shall
be governed by, construed in accordance with, and interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect
to its choice of laws principles.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	AQUASITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/	 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	SEACREST SHIPPING CO. LTD.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Kentucky Industries, 1937

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in Kentucky Industries, 1937 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 162*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1938,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5435,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER