alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 228 

Congratulating the Brown University women’s crew team for winning the 

2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Women’s Rowing 

Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Brown University women’s crew team 

for winning the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Women’s Rowing Championship. 

Whereas, on Sunday, May 27, 2007, the Brown University 

women’s crew team won the 2007 National Collegiate 

Athletic Assocation (NCAA) Division I Women’s Rowing 

Championship in Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 

Whereas the Brown University women’s crew team was 1 of 

only 2 teams that qualified for the grand final in varsity 

eights, junior varsity eights, and varsity fours; 

Whereas the Brown University women’s crew team has won 

5 NCAA championships in the last 9 years, in 1999, 

2000, 2002, 2004, and 2007, as well as finishing 2nd 

twice and 3rd twice during that period; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 228 ATS 

Whereas the Brown University women’s crew team is the 

winningest crew program in NCAA history; and 

Whereas the Brown University varsity women’s crew team 

had a record of 5–1 during the regular season, and both 

the 2nd varsity and novice teams were undefeated for the 

season: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates the Brown University wom3 en’s crew team for being champions on and off the 

4 water and for their victory in the 2007 National Col5 legiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I 

6 Women’s Rowing Championship; 

7 (2) recognizes the achievements of the rowers, 

8 coaches John and Phoebe Murphy, and the students 

9 and alumni whose dedication and hard work helped 

10 the Brown University women’s crew team win the 

11 NCAA championship; and 

12 (3) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

13 Senate to transmit a copy of this resolution for ap14 propriate display to Artemis Joukowsky, Chancellor 

15 Emeritus of Brown University. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE
                       LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY HOURLY EMPLOYEES
                               401(k) PLAN AND TRUST

     WHEREAS, Longview Fibre Company (the "Company") approved and 
adopted the Longview Fibre Company Hourly Employees 401(k) Plan (the 
"Plan") and Trust Agreement (the "Trust") which were originally 
effective June 3, 1985, most recently restated effective January 1, 
1991, and subsequently amended;

     WHEREAS, Section 19.1 of the Plan provides that the Company 
reserves the right to amend the Plan and Trust;

     NOW THEREFORE RESOLVED, that Appendix A is amended effective 
December 15, 1995 to delete the FDIC Insured Account and to add the U.S. 
Government Money Market Fund as follows:

                            APPENDIX A - INVESTMENT FUNDS

The Investment Funds offered to Participants and Beneficiaries include 
this set of daily valued funds:

     *  Asset Allocation Fund
     *  S&P 500 Stock Fund
     *  Employer Stock Fund
     *  U.S. Government Money Market Fund
     *  LifePath 2000 Fund
     *  LifePath 2010 Fund
     *  LifePath 2020 Fund
     *  LifePath 2030 Fund
     *  LifePath 2040 Fund

If investment instructions are not received from any Participant, his or 
her investment instructions shall be assumed to be a 100% investment in 
the U.S. Government Money Market Fund.


Date:  December 7, 1995                LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY
                                       By:\s\ L. J. Holbrook
                                       Title: Sr. V.P.-Finance

The provisions of the above amendment which relate to the Trustee are 
hereby approved and executed.

Date:  December 20, 1995               WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 
ASSOCIATION
                                       By:\s\ Dolores Upton
                                       Title: Vice President

Date:  December 20, 1995               WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 
ASSOCIATION
                                       By:\s\ Gwyn E. Slack
                                       Title: Vice President
<PAGE>
#### § 453.5 Officers, agents, shop stewards, or other representatives or employees of a labor organization.

With respect to labor organizations, the term “officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative” is defined in section 3(q) of the Act to include “elected officials and key administrative personnel, whether elected or appointed (such as business agents, heads of departments or major units, and organizers who exercise substantial independent authority)”. Other individuals employed by a labor organization, including salaried non-supervisory professional staff, stenographic, and service personnel are “employees” and must be bonded if they handle[5] funds or other property of the labor organization.

###### Footnotes -
  453.5

[5] For discussion of “handle”, see § 453.8.
§ 516.25 Employees paid for overtime on the basis of “applicable” rates provided in sections 7(g)(1) and 7(g)(2) of the Act. With respect to each employee compensated for overtime work in accordance with section 7(g)(1) or 7(f)(2) of the Act, employers shall maintain and preserve records containing all the information and data required by § 516.2(a) except paragraphs (a) (6) and (9) and, in addition, the following: ( a ) ( 1 ) Each hourly or piece rate at which the employee is employed,
( 2 ) basis on which wages are paid, and
( 3 ) the amount and nature of each payment which, pursuant to section 7(e) of the Act, is excluded from the “regular rate,”
( b ) The number of overtime hours worked in the workweek at each applicable hourly rate or the number of units of work performed in the work-week at each applicable piece rate during the overtime hours,
( c ) Total weekly overtime compensation at each applicable rate which is over and above all straight-time earnings or wages earned during overtime worked,
( d ) The date of the agreement or understanding to use this method of compensation and the period covered. If the employee is part of a workforce or employed in or by an establishment all of whose workers have agreed to use this method of compensation a single notation of the date of the agreement or understanding and the period covered will suffice.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas V. Smith,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Douglas V. SmithDouglasV.SmithChief
                Executive Officer





March
      1,
      2007





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any
      other purpose.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 9, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland**                     (Paul Kaboth, Banking Supervision) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:                 

*1. Gary Arthur Rubel and Nancy Sue Rubel,*                     both of Englewood, Florida; to acquire voting shares of CNB Bancorp, Inc., Woodsfield, Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Citizens National Bank of Woodsfield, Woodsfield, Ohio.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board

[FR Doc. 00-13256 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             277
<SECURITIES>                                    33,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                     24,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,111
<PP&E>                                         233,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,792
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,296
<SALES>                                        248,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,909
<CGS>                                          216,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,918
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 16, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 00273
- CV CHARLES BAILER , Appellant V. AT&T RISK MGT INC., ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal fr om the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. CC
- 12
- 02664
- C MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang

- Miers, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers The clerk’s record in this case is ov erdue. By letter dated June 13, 2013 , we informed appellant that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to fi le written verification that he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if he did not file the required documentation within ten da ys, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).

130273F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
CHARLES BAILER, Appellant
No. 05

- 13

- 00273

- CV V. AT&T RISK MGT INC., ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 02664

- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers. Justices Francis and Lewis participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees AT&T RISK MGT INC., ET AL., recover its costs of this appeal from appellant CHARLES BAILER.
Judgment entered this 16th day of December, 2013.

/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
DENY; and Opinion Filed February 9, 2017.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-00132-CV

No. 05-17-00133-CV

IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183 and F10-01184

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is relator’s January 30, 2017 “motion for nihil dicit default judgment” in 

which he requests that the Court order the trial court to issue a bench warrant to transport the 

relator to Dallas County so that he can attend an evidentiary hearing that has not yet been 

scheduled and to appoint counsel. We treat relator’s motion as a petition for writ of mandamus. 

To be entitled to a writ of mandamus in a criminal case, the relator must show that (1) he 

has no other adequate legal remedy to redress his alleged harm and that (2) what he seeks to 

compel is a ministerial act, not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young 

v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of App., 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). 

The relator also must provide the court with a record sufficient to establish his right to 

mandamus relief. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). Relator has not established his right to 

mandamus relief. 
–2–

Accordingly, we deny the relief requested.

170132F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,

and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and

judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and

conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 11, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ELAINE CHILDERS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

KANSAS UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT NO. 457,

 Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-3380

(D.C. No. 04-CV-1168-JTM)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, BALDOCK, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

Elaine Childers appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of the Kansas Unified School District No. 457, on her claim that, after the

school district found out she is an insulin-dependent diabetic, it terminated her

employment as a school bus driver and denied her a transfer to another position,
-2-

in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). On appeal, Ms. Miller

contends that

[w]hen an ADA plaintiff has alleged a defendant terminated her for a

health-connected reason such as becoming insulin-dependent [then]

the employer ha[s] a duty to commence the ADA’s interactive

process to assist the employee in seeking ways the impairment can be

accommodated by reassignment to fill available positions for which

the plaintiff’s skills and work experience show she is qualified.

Aplt. Br. at 1.

Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

district court’s grant of summary judgment, applying the same standard as that

court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Simms v. Okla. ex rel. Dep’t of Mental Health

& Substance Abuse Servs. , 165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir. 1999).

Having reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law pursuant to

the above-mentioned standard, we hold that Ms. Childers has not identified any

reversible error in this case. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district

court for substantially the same reasons stated in its order dated June 30, 2005, 

Aplt. App. at 91.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
(78 South. 306)

#### SIMMONS v. STATE.

(6 Div. 445.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

March 12, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; C. P. Almon, Judge.

Jim Simmons was indicted, tried, and convicted of felonious adultery, and from the judgment appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

E. B. & K. Y. Eite, of Hamilton, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Emmett S. Thigpen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMEORD, J.

There is not sufficient evidence disclosed by the bill of exceptions to warrant the submission of this case to the jury, and on authority of Metcalf v. State, ante, p. 389, 78 South. 305, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 259 

Commending the Oregon State University baseball team for winning the 

2007 College World Series. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2007 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. SMITH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Oregon State University baseball team for 

winning the 2007 College World Series. 

Whereas on June 24, 2007, the Oregon State University 

baseball team won the 2007 College World Series in 

Omaha, Nebraska after defeating California State University, Fullerton by a score of 3 to 2; Arizona State 

University by a score of 12 to 6; University of California, 

Irvine by a score of 7 to 1; and the University of North 

Carolina at Chapel Hill in the championship by scores of 

11 to 4 and 9 to 3; 

Whereas this is the second consecutive College World Series 

championship Oregon State University has won, making 

the University the first repeat College World Series 

champion in a decade; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 259 ATS 

Whereas the success of the team was a direct result of the 

skill, intensity, and resolve of every player on the Oregon 

State University baseball team, including Erik Ammon, 

Darwin Barney, Hunter Beaty, Scotty Berke, Reed 

Brown, Brian Budrow, Mitch Canham, Bryn Card, Brett 

Casey, Jackson Evans, Kyle Foster, Drew George, Mark 

Grbavac, Chad Hegdahl, Chris Hopkins, Koa Kahalehoe, 

Greg Keim, Blake Keitzman, Josh Keller, Eddie Kunz, 

Joey Lakowske, Lonnie Lechelt, Jordan Lennerton, Mike 

Lissman, Anton Maxwell, Jake McCormick, Chad 

Nading, Jason Ogata, Ryan Ortiz, Joe Paterson, Tyrell 

Poggemeyer, Joe Pratt, Jorge Reyes, Scott Santschi, 

Kraig Sitton, Alex Sogard, Dale Solomon, Michael 

Stutes, Daniel Turpen, John Wallace, Braden Wells, and 

Joey Wong; 

Whereas freshman pitcher Jorge Reyes was recognized as the 

Most Outstanding Player of the 2007 College World Series tournament; 

Whereas Darwin Barney, Mitch Canham, Mike Lissman, 

Jorge Reyes, Scott Santschi, and Joey Wong were named 

to the 2007 All-College World Series tournament team; 

and 

Whereas the 2007 College World Series victory of the Oregon 

State University baseball team ended a terrific season in 

which the team compiled a record of 49 wins to 18 losses: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Oregon State University 

3 baseball team, Head Coach Pat Casey and his 

4 coaching staff, Athletic Director Bob DeCarolis, and 

5 Oregon State University President Edward John 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 259 ATS 

1 Ray on their tremendous accomplishment in defend2 ing their 2007 College World Series championship 

3 title; and 

4 (2) respectfully requests the Secretary of the 

5 Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu6 tion to the President of Oregon State University. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 341 

Concerning the recent forest fires in Greece. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 2, 2007 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Concerning the recent forest fires in Greece. 

Whereas more than 3,000 forest fires have been recorded in 

Greece since June 2007; 

Whereas over a 10-day period, an estimated 4,000 people saw 

their homes destroyed by the wildfires, which razed dozens of villages, destroyed livestock and charred an estimated 469,000 acres of mostly forest and farmland; 

Whereas dozens of Greek families have lost their loved ones 

to the fires; 

Whereas thousands of Greeks have been left homeless and 

hundreds of thousands of acres of pristine forest have 

been destroyed; 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of mature olive trees, vineyards and thousands of animals perished in the flames; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 341 IS 

Whereas damage to the Greek economy is estimated at between $1,600,000,000 and $5,400,000,000; 

Whereas the United States and Greece have stood side by 

side in confronting world challenges throughout the 20th 

century, and will stand together in confronting this new 

challenge; and 

Whereas the United States, through its government, its people and its Greek-American community, has already extended significant support to the people of Greece during 

this difficult time: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) extends its condolences and sympathy to the 

3 Government and the people of Greece for the grave 

4 loss of life and vast destruction caused by the dev5 astating fires raging through Greece; 

6 (2) vows its full support and solidarity to a 

7 close friend, a strategic partner, and a longstanding 

8 ally in this painful and difficult hour; 

9 (3) fully supports the Administration’s initia10 tives to provide assistance and relief to the people of 

11 Greece, including its pledge of $1,500,000 in aid as 

12 well as expert and technical assistance; 

13 (4) encourages public institutions, specialized 

14 agencies, as well as private citizens, to offer their re15 sources; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 341 IS 

1 (5) expresses confidence that Greece and its 

2 people will succeed in overcoming the hardships in3 curred through this tragedy. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS