alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

76°5;
39°18

HIGHLAND 6.6 Mi.
ELIQAK 0j7

2'30"

3] 6p

ag

30a

434) |

5662 111 NW.

1§ MI. TO U.S. 40

©

WASHINGTON 0.0. 23 Mi.

“37

CLARKSVILLE 4.8 Mi. (CLARKSVILLE)

‘SCAGGSVILLE 218 Mi

10S,

480 000 [ys

FEET ft

2

5.8 MI. TO MD. 108
SCAGGSVILLE 1.7 MI.

44

JAL TIMORE 13 MI.
2 MI} TO U.S. 40\343

5662 IV SE’
(ELLIC

0.6 MI. TO U.S. 29
TT CITY) 344

47/30

Fort Gorge G Meate\

Z\

Juyetion

4 ~

SA-4-6-1
[97 2.9 mI. TO U.S.

i

870 [gy FEET

PUN “i NG

7645"

Neos (une. us. ‘g ALT.) 1.7 MI.

OPEN-FILE REPORT
98-757

| PLATE 1

A
42/30" Bat TiMoRE (JUNG. U.S. 40) 44 mil {BALT
1 Sie 7

39°O7'" .- - > t na ooh re eRe ee S80 DENTON 3.5 mi “fl ls80000 Feet [982 42/30” ODENTON (JUNC. MD.ITB) 2-7 Mi (
zeonorine Ta 40000 FRET, Fo (oe WASHINGTON MONUMENT 2 Mi S068 I SE Een Ena eee te 2.7 mt. TO Mo. 602 gs ae” Geclogy mapped by Drake 1992-94; assisted in 1992 .
Base from U.S. Geological Survey National Association of Geology Teachers (NAGT) inter
Savage and Relay, 1957: photorevised in 1966 and 1974 Philip Teas, and in 1993 by NAGT intern Miriam Hart and
. Volunteer for Science Catlin Lanham
K ey
> & .& 5 &
Re ij 9< of - YW =
RSs a zu cs) PS> Se
ake . fs er al
TR = Ek 9 a2 e <
& + ay at ce) Zz 3D 7
A in N a a3 & 693 &2 A
es ce Pa [v4 A Bator 4000
4000 4 al x St etl
_ 4 : afas 32 ae A
o L 3000
2000 | BS v4 ABT EE BE TT ome ;
7 / / 4 ; /
Se oo & Ne 4 ye VY | gs" 4 ] ie, /” | 2000
2000 4 | a y ea SS poi iy a ss KA j vA /
v 7
| LOCH RAVEN THRUST SHEET »- yo Oe is " aa | i (} Va yo I
fl y S y, F100
1000 4 Z SSS Gupaaec Op =f Op YY n 1 7
by | €Zo Velo Surtace \ 4! Ey ieee ee Sale 2 Vom. f if LZ od // or
oe Me ry ee | SEA LEVEL
SEA LEVEL . / / / Vs
~~ / / / / a
Pg J op / / / L 600
1000 + ~ / / x
Dg Ss »~ oO / / af
» Se hs / / / ae L- 2000
2000 + *S op / “Oc
€2 \ Se Le ae A /
‘ Si a / { | 3000
3000 + SS —P we / /
\ SLO / /
4000 j tac?

not shown on section

Cretaceous Rects and Surficial Deposits

SCALE 1:24 000
ua )

1 MILE

1

0.5 0

1 KILOMETER

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE PIEDMONT IN THE SAVAGE AND RELAY QUADRANGLES,
HOWARD, BALTIMORE, AND ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTIES, MARYLAND

By
Avery Ala Drake, Jr.
1998

|
This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with

U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American
Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive
purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  171,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,415)
<INVENTORY>                                    220,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390,857
<PP&E>                                          41,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,247)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 435,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,959
<BONDS>                                          6,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   435,051
<SALES>                                        205,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,186
<CGS>                                          180,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   405
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    573
<INCOME-TAX>                                       238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       335
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
§ 551.6 Action on petition. ( a ) Upon the filing of a petition as provided in this part, the Administrator will give consideration thereto, and make any further inquiry into the facts that he may deem necessary. The Administrator may require, before taking further action thereof, that notice of the petition be given to affected employees in such manner as he shall determine to be appropriate to afford them an opportunity to submit any facts or reasons supporting or opposing the finding prayed for in the petition. If the Administrator determines that the petition fails to satisfy any of the requirements of this part, he shall deny the request for a finding or, in his discretion, advise petitioners that further consideration will be given to the submission if the deficiencies are remedied within a specified time. No further consideration will be given, however, to a request for a finding if the Administrator determines that the factual situation as described in the petition is not one in which authority to make the finding is provided by section 13(b)(11) and this part.
( b ) If the Administrator determines that a petition meets all requirements of this part and if he is satisfied from consideration of all relevant facts and information available to him that the wage payment plan submitted has, within the meaning of section 13(b)(11) of the Act and this part, the general purpose and effect with respect to drivers or drivers' helpers making local deliveries, who are employed pursuant to its provisions on the basis of trip rates or other delivery payment plan, of reducing the hours worked by such employees to, or below, the maximum workweek applicable to them under section 7(a) of the Act, the Administrator will make an appropriate finding to this effect, and notify the petitioner; otherwise the request for such a finding will be denied.
#### Local 381 Pension Fund, Appellant, v Chemical Bank et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 5, 1996;

decided April 25, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied appellant’s cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint and for discovery relief, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                  and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**R.        H. WOLLENBERG**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ITEM 8 OF THIS FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     84,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,684
<PP&E>                                       1,788,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                 774,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,260,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,303
<BONDS>                                        498,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     371,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,260,903
<SALES>                                        772,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               772,845
<CGS>                                          661,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  661,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40642

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

THOMAS EARL WRIGHT, also known as Pac, also known as Pacman,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-129-2

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Earl Wright has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Wright has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 2, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40642 Document: 00514538384 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/02/2018
No. 17-40642

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40642 Document: 00514538384 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/02/2018
Related ca s e s : H ealth related ca s e s : Ecotox related ca s e s : C on c e1 ·n l evel s : 

### SAT Report P MN N umber : P-11-0484 SAT Date: 7 / 19 / 2011 Pr int D ate : 7 / 8 / 2015 Ye s

T y pe of C oncern: Health E co Le v el of C oncern: 1
- 2 2 2 3

Pers i s tence 3 

# I

E xpo s ure Bas ed Review: Health: No E cotox: No Bioac c um 1 

# I Toxicity 1 

# I C omment s P MN 

# -

Route s of expo s ure: Health: De1mal D r ink in g Water Inh al ati o n

P2Rec C omments : C omment: No Co m me n t Keyword s : Ke y word s : IRR

- E , S , L , MM LUNG UNC E RTMUTA Ecotox: A ll r elease s to water Fate: ; P MN s low ;AQUATOX-A , C S umma ry of Ass e ss m e nt :

Solid l og Kow = 0.92 (E) S = Disp ./ 22.7 mg/L at 25 C (ICB/E) VP < l. OE

- 6 to n at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) l og Koc 

### = 5

. 2 1 (E) l og Fi sh BCF = 0.50 (E) l og Fi sh BAF 

### = 1. 8 1 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time fo r comp l ete ulti mate aer obic 010 1 Cleg S01pt i on to so ils / sed ime n ts = PMN**"''"~** PBT Potent ial : PMN P3B 1 ; *CEB F ATE: Migra t ion to H e alth: H e alth S umm a r y: Abs01ption i s**~r oug** **h** t h e skin and modera t e a

n d GI t r act , ba sed o n analog s . T h e - co n s t ituen t mig h t oxi dize to the

. T h ere are co n cem s for initation to a ll exposed t i ssues and for adver se of the P MN substance and info n nation in t h e mu tage nic i ty , based o n

Ec oto x : T es t T es t T es t E nd Pr e dicte d Me a s ure d C omm e nt s Or g ani s m T ype Point fi s h 96 -h L C5 0 20daphnid 4 8-h L C5 0 13 g re e n a l g al 96 -h EC5 0 25 fi s h c hroni c 3. 1



## - v alu e daphnid



## - chro nic 2. 0 v alu e a l g al



## - chronic 1 2 v alu e**Sew ~**  3- h EC5 0



## -**lud ~** **Sew ~**  

## - C hronic



## -**lud ~**  Va lu e Ec oto x V alu es Co mm e nt s : Pr e di ct i o n s a re b ased o n S AR s f o r S AR c h e m i cal cl a s s 

### = ; - ; co n c ent r ati on s ba s ed on 100 % a c ti v e co n c entrat i on s; h a rdne s s < 1 8 0.0 m g/L a s CaC 0 3 f

o r fi s h and dap hnid s and 1 5 t o 2 4 m g/L f or gr e en a l gae ; and TO C < 2. 0 m g/L ;

Ec oto x F acto r s C omment s:

SAT C hair:- F ate a ssess or: E cotox assess or: He a lth assess or :
DISMISS; Opinion tiled October 10, 2012

In The

(!nitrt uf .\p.nati

Fift1! t1iitrirt f at a1Iai

No. 05-1 l-00878-CV

MATHEW OLANYA, Appellant

V.

tLS. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR RASC 2005KS10, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-04019-1)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers

Opinion By Chief Justice Wright

Befhre the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. Appellant appeals from

the trial court’s judgment awarding possession of property to appellee. Appellee informs the Court

that it obtained a writ of possession and has been given possession of the property. Appellant did

not file a response to the motion to dismiss.

A case becomes moot if, at any stage during the proceedings, a controversy ceases to exist

between the parties. See Williams v. Lam, 52 S.W.3d 171. 184 (Tex. 2001). The purpose of a

forcible detainer action is to obtain immediate possession ofproperty. See Scott v. Hewitt, 127 Tex.

31. 35. 90 S.W.2d 816, 818-19 (1936). A judgment of possession in a forcible detainer action

determines the right of immediate possession and is not intended to be a final determination of
whether the eviction is wrongful. S’ce Mars/ia!! v. Jhni.sing Jul/i. of 1/ic (i/v a! San Antonio, 198

S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006).

Appellant failed to supercede the trial court’s judgment. The judgment has been executed

on and appeHee is now in possession of the property. The issue of possession is no longer in

controversy. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. Sec Trx. R. App. P.

42.3(a).

;( /

C’\ROI \NWR1CiJ-If

Cl 1I1 JJ,S1 ICJ/

11 0878F.P05
(!L11Irt uf pprtt

.fiftIi 1itrirt ui rxa!i zit Jztt1w5

JUDGMENT

MATHEW OLANYA. Appellant

No. 05-1 I-00878-CV V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS

TRUSTEE FOR RASC 200 5KS 10. Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of i)allas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. CC—li —

0401 9-D).

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright,

J u St CC5 Franc is and I. an g -M i e rs,

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

it is ORDERED that appellee, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for RASC

2005KS10, recover its costs of the appeal from appellant. Mathew Olanya.

Judgment entered October 10, 2012.

- / - //

CAROLYN WRICiHY

CFIIFF JUSTICE

/ 7
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vastera, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Timothy A. Davenport, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial position and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Timothy A. Davenport              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Timothy A. Davenport                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 6, 2004                   |

 

Signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Vastera, Inc. and will beretained byVastera, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-1134 September Term, 2021

NRC-PRM-50-1117

Filed On: February 3, 2022

George Berka,

Petitioner

v.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and

United States of America,

Respondents

PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM AN ORDER OF

THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

BEFORE: Wilkins, Rao, and Jackson, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This petition for review of an order of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was

considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be dismissed. 

Petitioner has not shown that he has Article III standing to challenge the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission’s denial of his petition for rulemaking. See Lujan v. Defenders

of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) (Article III standing requires a showing of a

particularized injury-in-fact, causation, and redressability). Petitioner’s asserted injury

based on climate change is not a particularized injury. See Ctr. for Biological Diversity

v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 563 F.3d 466, 478 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (stating that climate change

does not constitute a particularized injury in the absence of allegations showing that the

harm is “focused any more on [a petitioner] than it is on the remainder of the world’s

population”). Additionally, to the extent petitioner claims particularized injury resulting

from possible power outages during cold weather, he has not demonstrated injury that

is actual or imminent. See Public Citizen, Inc. v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin.,

489 F.3d 1279, 1292 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (injury must be “distinct and palpable, as opposed

to merely abstract, and the alleged harm must be actual or imminent, not conjectural or

hypothetical”). Nor has petitioner demonstrated that the asserted injury is redressable
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-1134 September Term, 2021

by a favorable decision. Where redress “depends on actions by a third party not before

the court, the petitioner must demonstrate that a favorable decision would create a

significant increase in the likelihood that the plaintiff would obtain relief that directly

redresses the injury suffered.” Klamath Water Users Ass’n v. FERC, 534 F.3d 735, 739

(D.C. Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, petitioner has not

demonstrated that a favorable decision would create a significant increase in the

likelihood of third parties reopening a nuclear power plant that would prevent

interruption of power service to petitioner.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
ex10_1-f8k04102015.htm


 


 



	






	
Regional Commercial Banking Office

MAC Z6204-018


200 South Biscayne Boulevard


Annex Building


Miami, FL 33131




	 	
Tel: 305 789 1220



Fax: 305 789 5036









 


April 10, 2015


 


Mr. Michael Steiner

EnviroStar

290 NE 68th St


Miami, Florida 33138


 


Dear Michael:


 


Reference is made to that certain Loan Agreement dated as of November 16, 2011 (the "Agreement") between EnviroStar, Inc. (the "Borrower") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Bank") successor in interest by merger of Wachovia Bank, N.A. The Agreement and all other documents executed and delivered in connection therewith are collectively referred to herein as the "Loan Documents". All capitalized terms used but not defined herein, shall have the meanings assigned in the Loan Documents.


 


In March 2015, the Borrower informed that the Bank that Symmetric Capital, LLC acquired a 40.4% equity interest in Borrower's business. Given the change in control, the following violation occurred:


 


          SECTION 6.1, The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute art "Event of Default" under this Agreement:


 


    (i)        Any change in control of Borrower or any entity or combination of entitles that directly or indirectly control Borrower, with "control" defined as ownership of an aggregate of twenty•five percent (25%) or more of the common stock. members' equity or other ownership interest (other than a limited partnership interest) without the consent of Bank.


 


The Bank agreed to this waive the aformentioned violation once our due diligence on the new equity investor was done, which has been satisfactorily completed.


 


This waiver is limited to the default cited above and shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent default under the referenced provision, or of any existing or future defaults under any other provision of an Loan Document.


 


Very Truly Yours


 





 


Matthew J. Rapoport

Assistant Vice President


 


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.