alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bisphenol A Imm rat_inj 

## minLEL: 2 mglkgiday maxHDT 1000 mg/kgiday Imm_rat_oral 

## minLEL: 200 mglkg OVX_mouse_oral maxHDT: 200 ma'kalc
OVX rat_inj 

## minLEL 50 mg/kg/day ~ 

## .<..' ~~ 

## _ _ • ''

'.-•

~ 

## ,_••- ''-•. '~•. ' •.,•:: - ; ;:: -- ~ s 

## _ _ _ _ -•,,. . -:.,:-. ,-;;_ ,:; .• _ , . ',:••-. --'; ~ 

## _ -,
. . . ~~ -, b ~ ,`. , - ~~ ,, ~ ,, ~ , ~ , : .

: ~~ ~,~-, ~ 

# :;' ;

~ 

# : .`' =

~ 

# /; _. .

~ 4'
.+:~ ~ 

# '7' i:

~ 

# _

~~ -•;-••-. OVX_mouse_inj

minLEL: 100 mgikg!day 

### OVX_rat oral maxHDT: 600 mgikg/dayMethoxychlor Imm rat_inj minLEL: 50 mg/kg/day maxHDT: 200 mg!kg/day Imm_rat_oral minLEL 20 mg.%kg

OVX_rat_i nj minLEL: 100 mgfk ~ VX_mouse_oral

)VX_mouse_inj 

### OVX rat_oral minLEL: 50 mgikg/day

### Butylparaben Imm_rat_inj minLEL: 70 mg/kglday Imm_rat_ maxHDT: 400

OVX_rat minLEL: 800 

### r _mouse_oral 1000 mg/kg/day
_mouse_i nj 50 mglkg/day OVX_rat_oral

### Diethylstilbestrol Imm rat_inj min ~ 

### EL Se-05 mg/kgiday maxHDT: 5e-05 mg/kgfday 

### Imm_rat_oi minLEL 1e-04 mg



### OVX rat X_mouse_oral

✓ X_mouse_inj 

### OVX_rat_oral

### 4-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenol Imm rat_inj minLEL: 200 mg/kg/day 

### Imm_rat minLEL: 56 rr maxHDT: 250



### OVX_ra ~ VX_mouse_oral
)VX_mouse_inj OVX_rat_oralBenzophenone Imm rat_inj minLEL: 500 mg/kg/day maxHDT: 200 mglkg/day Imm_rat_oral

OVX_rat_inj VX_mouse_oral
)VX_mouse_inj OVX_rat_oral

### Methylparaben Imm_rat_inj minLEL: 55 mg/kglday maxHDT: 80 mglkg/day 

### Imm_rat maxHDT: 800


### OVX_ra ~ ✓ X_mouse_oral

~ VX_mouse_inj 

### OVX_rat_oral4-Octylphenol Imm rat_inj maxHDT: 200 mgfkglday Imm_rat minLEL:100

OVX_r2 vX_mouse_oral
)VX_mouse_inj OVX_rat_oral

### Permethrin Imm_rat_inj minLEL: 800 mglkg/day 

### Imm_rat_oral

OVX_rat_inj VX_mouse_oral

~ VX_mouse_inj 

### OVX_rat_oral maxHDT: 150 mglkglday

### Apigenin Imm_rat_inj 

### Imm_rat_ maxHDT: 200



### OVX_ra ~ VX_mouse_oral

~ VX_mouse_inj 

### OVX rat_oral minLEL: 5 mglkg/day
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4, File No. 333-185573 under the Securities Act of
1933 and Amendment No. 192 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4, File No. 811-06032 under the Securities Act of 1940 of Separate Account VA B of our report dated April 24, 2015 relating to the financial statements of Separate Account VA B and
to the use of our report dated April 24, 2015 with respect to the financial statements of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm” in such Registration Statement. 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
 Chicago, Illinois  

April 24, 2015 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information
and to the use of our reports: (1) dated February 6, 2015, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, (2) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the statutory-basis
financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (3) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA BNY and Separate Account VA B, included in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 333-185573) and related Prospectuses of Transamerica Variable Annuity Series, MEMBERS Variable Annuity Series and Partners Variable Annuity Series. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, IA 

April 24, 2015
"verv1ew112013CivilianOvertimePerformance0Developingthe2014OvertimeBudget112013PoliceOvertimePerformance0Developingthe2014OvertimeBudget

# Civilian Overtime Performance

II 

# • Excluding snow and Sandy Recovery, overtime usage was flat when

compared to 2012.

Overtime usage exceeded plan (89,000 

# hours or 12% over plan)

due to:

0 

# Unanticipated work associated with accelerated aeronautical

construction projects

0 

# Compliance with new FAA requirements for airport pavement

markings and striping and accelerated maintenance requirements

on public safety vehicles



# 0 Higher than planned staff coverage due to vacancies and absencesImproved civilian overtime budgeting --

Adjustments reflected in 2014 budget

Adjusted to recognized current staff absence

and turnover rates and set targets to improve

productive time Identified variable work levels through rigorous

analysis of historical data

Provided new resources to support new work2014 budget provides management

penormance measures

Ill Managers are accountable to manage within overtime plan and use

strategies to meet reduction targets

1000

u;

-g 800

"' en :::

0

..c

1- 600

t: **~ ~**  :::

0 400

:c

"' E **~** 200

>

0 0

20148 2014- 3Q Target 2014- 4Q Target 2015- Year End Target

DCivlian Overtime mExtreme Weather

• Strategies to support management in meeting plan

D Integrated Absence Management Program

D Adjust work schedules to allow for optimal straight time deployment

D Overtime Executive Steering Committee oversight to review Department performance

D Provide staffing resources when there is new, required and on-going workPoliceOvertimePerformance2013Actualvs.2013Budgetvs.2012Actual(/)"'C!:Ill(/)1,2001,000:::l8000..s:::1-!:(/)600....:::l0:I:Q)E400:eQ)>0200OTthruQ4TotalPolice384Khoursoverbudget:DTrainingDHigherthananticipatedairportperimeterpatrolsDSupervisorvacanciesDSick/100DApplicantinvestigationforrecruitclassDSecuritypostsatGWBandPABTImproved2014policeovertimebudgetdesignedtoreflectoperationalrealitiesAdjustedovertimeassumptionstoalignwithactualproductivityofpoliceWorkloadbasedonpostassessments113thPoliceClassauthorizedtomeetnewandpriorityworkatvariouscommandsincludingtoWTCCSO2014OvertimeMitigationStrategies•CommandingOfficersareaccountabletomanagewithinovertimeplan•Department-coordinatedefforttoidentifyoffsetsforpriorityornewwork111StrategiestosupportmanagementinmeetingovertimeplanDEnhanceAbsenceManagementtoimproveproductivity•ProvideresourcestomorequicklyreturnsickstafftoworkinordertoincreaseproductivityDPost-by-PostanalysistoensureonlyrequiredworkiscompletedDContinueddailyreviewofovertimeperformancebyCommandingOfficers&bi-weeklymeetingswithCSOandDeputyCSODStrategicdeploymentofnewpoliceofficersandsupervisorstocommandswithnew,requiredoron-goingwork
§ 458.81 Objection to conduct of hearing. ( a ) Any objection with respect to the conduct of the hearing, including any objection to the introduction of evidence, may be stated orally or in writing accompanied by a short statement of the grounds for such objection and included in the record. No such objection shall be deemed waived by further participation in the hearing. Such objection shall not stay the conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Automatic exceptions will be allowed to all adverse rulings. Rulings by the Administrative Law Judge shall not be appealed prior to the transfer of the case to the Administrative Review Board, but shall be considered by the Administrative Review Board only upon the filing of exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision and order in accordance with § 458.88.
[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980; 45 FR 28322, Apr. 29, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

James Earl Piland, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00063

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR 13

- 214 ). Opinion delivered by Chi ef Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, James Earl Piland, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 17, 2 014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**EXHIBIT 23(b)**

 

Information Regarding Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP 

 

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provides that if part of aregistration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring asecurity pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert to claim against, among others, an accountant who has consented to be named as havingcertified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement. 

 

In June of 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) was convicted of obstructing justice, which is a felony offense. The SEC prohibits firmsconvicted of a felony from auditing public companies. Andersen is thus unable to consent to the incorporation by reference of its audit report with respect to Cybex International, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31,2001, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-79899, 333-29045, 2-79563, 33-46109, 33-46110, 33-48124, 33-59947,33-59945, 333-97379 and 333-97377) and on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-34309). Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits Cybex International, Inc. to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated byreference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in Cybex International, Inc. securities pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statementsaudited by Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State compacts; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs published a notice in the Federal 
Register on May 16, 2000 (65 FR 31189), concerning a list of approved 
Tribal-State Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming 
activities on Indian lands in the State of California. The list of 
California Indian Tribes contained an incorrect name for a particular 
Tribe.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 16, 2000, in FR Doc. 00-12322, on 
page 31189, in the second column, correct the SUMMARY caption listing 
the tribes, specifically, the Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Mission 
Indians of the Santa Rosa Reservation to read: Santa Rosa Indian 
Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria.

DATES: This action is effective May 31, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-13498 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
**EXHIBIT 23(a)**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

Cybex International,Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatement on Form S-3 (No. 333-34309) and in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-79899, 333-29045, 2-79563, 33-46109, 33-46110, 33-48124, 33-59947, 33-59945, 333-97379, and 333-97377) of Cybex International, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 6, 2004, except as to the last sentence of the paragraph entitled “Hot New Products v. Cybex International, Inc.” in Note 11, which is as of February 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CybexInternational, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 andthe related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Cybex International, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to our audit of the disclosures that were added to revise the 2001 consolidated financial statements, as more fully described in Note 2 to theconsolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements other than with respect to such disclosures. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 12, 2004
Rockingham

No. 7147

#### John L. Mangin, Sr. v. Mildred M. Mangin

August 29, 1975

*490
      *Wiggin, Nourie, Sundeen, Pingree Bigg (Larry B. Pletcher*and *L. Jonathan Ross)*for the plaintiff.

*Mildred M. Mangin,*pro se.

Per curiam.

Appeal by the defendant from the granting of a divorce, together with provisions for support and custody, on the grounds of irreconcilable differences causing an irremediable breakdown in the parties’ marriage. RSA 458:7-a (Supp. 1973). The defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by *Morris,*J.

This case was first heard by a Master *(Leonard C. Hardwick,*Esq.) who made certain findings and rulings and recommended that a divorce be granted. His report was approved, but a subsequent motion by the defendant for a rehearing was granted. The case was again heard and the master’s report -recommending a divorce, upon the same grounds as previously, together with findings and rulings, was again approved. In all these hearings the defendant was adequately represented by counsel but chose to appear pro se on her appeal to this court.

The issue before us is whether the record supports the decree. We hold that it does. A careful examination of the transcripts and exhibits discloses ample evidence to sustain the granting of the divorce. The orders for support were $60 weekly for the maintenance of the minor child, whose custody was awarded to the defendant, payment of all his dental, medical, and optical expenses, and a lump sum of $100.

As to these orders, it is fundamental in such cases that the court has broad discretion *(Comer v. Comer,*110 N.H. 505, 507, 272 A.2d 586, 587 (1970)) and that its decision will not be set aside unless “the evidence demonstrates clearly an abuse” of such discretion. *Collette v. Collette,*108 N.H. 469, 470, 238 A.2d 598, 599 (1968). *See also Ford v. Ford,*112 N.H. 270, 293 A.2d 605 (1972). In the present case it is clear that the court’s conclusions were well within the proper bounds.

The record discloses the proceedings were free from error and the order is

*Decree affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTIANS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                       722
<INVENTORY>                                     40,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,342
<PP&E>                                          37,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,352
<BONDS>                                          2,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,876
<SALES>                                        165,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,074
<CGS>                                          126,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice; SES Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review Board.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This appointment is effective on August 12, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pamela S. Pope, Office of Human Capital (H), National Archives and Records Administration, 1 Archives Drive, St. Louis, MO 63138, (314) 801-0882.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive performance.

The members of the Performance Review Board for the National Archives and Records Administration are: Debra Steidel Wall, Deputy Archivist of the United States, Thomas E. Mills, Chief Operating Officer, Analisa J. Archer, Chief Human Capital Officer, and Micah M. Cheatham, Chief Financial Officer. These appointments supersede all previous appointments.

Dated: August 9, 2011.

David S. Ferriero,

Archivist of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2011-20676 Filed 8-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit (23)


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-52543, Form S-8 No. 33-52545, Form S-8 No. 33-54229, Form S-8
No. 33-56857, Form S-8 No. 33-56861, Form S-8 No. 33-61399, Form S-8 No.
33-20431 and Form S-8 No. 333-25865) pertaining to the Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan, Management Incentive Program, LTV Steel Group Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, Non-Employee Directors' Equity Compensation Plan, The Hourly
Employee Stock Payment Alternative Plan, Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for
Certain Key Executives of Continental Emsco Company, Salaried Employee Stock
Option Plan and The LTV Corporation Amended and Restated Management Incentive
Program, respectively, of The LTV Corporation of our report dated January 28,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The LTV
Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1998 and of our report dated January 22, 1999 with
respect to the financial statements of Trico Steel Company, L.L.C. included in
the Form 10-K of The LTV Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
February 26, 1999
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Fluctuations and Unemployment of Women: Certain Indications From Various Sources, 1928-31

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth. 						*Employment Fluctuations and Unemployment of Women: Certain Indications From Various Sources, 1928-31 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 113*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1933,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5411,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### In the Matter of Doris L. Sassower, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Respondent.

Submitted April 15, 1996;

decided June 11, 1996

Judges Levine and Ciparick taking no part.