Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 103 / Friday, May 26, 2000 / Notices 34231

environmental assessment (EA) is the

appropriate means to serve as the

analysis and the basis for decisions on

lands identified in the Military Lands

Withdrawal Act of 1999 for public land

management.

The following resource-related issues

have been identified: (1) Off Highway

Vehicle use; (2) public access (hunting,

ranching, mining claims, etc.); (3)

livestock grazing; (4) sage grouse habitat

preservation; (5) Pony Express Trail

protection; (6) wildfire prevention and

suppression. The BLM and Navy are

soliciting comments regarding issues

and concerns the public may have.

EFFECTIVE DATES: Two public scoping

meetings will be held in June 2000 to

allow the public an opportunity to

identify issues and concerns to be

addressed in the RMP Amendment.

Representatives from BLM and Navy

will be available to answer questions

about the Military Lands Withdrawal

Act of 1999 and the RMP Amendment

process. Comments will be accepted

until June 30, 2000.

The scheduled public meetings are:

Fallon, NV (7:00–9:00 p.m.)—June 13,

2000, Fallon Convention Center, 100

Campus Way, Fallon, NV.

Reno, NV (7–9 p.m.)—June 15, 2000,

BLM Nevada State Office, 1340

Financial Blvd., Reno, NV.

The proposed plan amendment

schedule is as follows:

Begin Public Scoping: May 25, 2000.

Public Scoping Meetings: June 13 and

15, 2000.

Release Proposed Plan Amendment, EA

and FONSI for Public Review,

Governor’s Consistency Review:

November 30, 2000.

Issue Plan Amendment and Decision

Record: May 1, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scoping comments may be sent to: Field

Manager, Bureau of Land Management,

5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson City,

NV 89701. ATTN: Navy Project

Manager.

For additional information, write to

the above address or call Terri Knutson

(BLM Project Manager) at (775) 885–

6156 or email tknutson@nv.blm.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1998

the Navy completed an environmental

impact statement (EIS) to analyze the

proposed withdrawal of public lands to

provide safety and training buffers

around three established training ranges

in Churchill County, Nevada. The

Findings and Recommendations

resulting from the EIS were transmitted

to Congress and in October 1999 the

Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999,

Public Law 106–65 was passed and

signed by the President. The Act

specifies several actions to be taken by

the BLM and Navy prior to October

2001, including development of a plan

for management of each area withdrawn

for protection of the resources and

values. Federal, state, and local

agencies, Tribal entities, and other

individuals or organizations who may

be interested in or affected by the

decisions to be made in this plan

amendment are invited to participate in

the scoping process and may request, or

be requested by the BLM and Navy, to

participate as a cooperating agency.

Dated: May 15, 2000.

John O. Singlaub,

Manager, Carson City Field Office.

[FR Doc. 00–13164 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–U

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337–TA–434]

Notice of Investigation

In the Matter of: Certain Magnetic

Resonance Injection Systems and

Components Thereof.

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

April 25, 2000, and supplemented on

May 10, 2000 and May 17, 2000, under

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of

Medrad, Inc., One Medrad Drive,

Indianola, Pennsylvania 15051–0780.

The complaint alleges violations of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

and the sale within the United States

after importation of certain magnetic

resonance injection systems,

components thereof, and molds therefor

by reason of infringement of claims 8–

9, 22, 25–28, 30–31, and 33–39 of U.S.

Letters Patent Re. 36,648. The complaint

further alleges that there exists an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after a hearing, issue a permanent

exclusion order and permanent cease

and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons

with mobility impairments who will

need special assistance in gaining access

to the Commission should contact the

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey R. Whieldon, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission,

telephone 202–205–2580. General

information concerning the Commission

may also be obtained by accessing its

internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in § 210.10 of the Commission’s rules of

practice and procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(1999).

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

May 19, 2000, ordered that:

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain magnetic

resonance injection systems and

components thereof by reason of

infringement of claims 8–9, 22, 25–28,

30–31, or 33–39 of U.S. Letters Patent

Re. 36,648, and whether there exists an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is: Medrad, Inc.,

One Medrad Drive, Indianola,

Pennsylvania 15051–0780.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

Nemoto Kyorindo Co., Ltd., 3–26–4

Hongo Bunkyou-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Liebel-Flarsheim Co., 2111 E. Galbraith

Road, Cincinnati, OH 45215–6305

Mallinckrodt Inc., (New York

corporation), 675 McDonnell

Boulevard, Hazelwood, MO 63042.

34232 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 103 / Friday, May 26, 2000 / Notices

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR § 207.2(f)).

Mallinckrodt Inc., (Delaware

corporation), 675 McDonnell

Boulevard, Hazelwood, MO 63042.

(c) Jeffrey R. Whieldon, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 401–H, Washington,

DC 20436, who shall be the Commission

investigative attorney, party to this

investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with § 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s rules, such responses will

be considered by the Commission if

received not later than 20 days after the

date of service by the Commission of the

complaint and the notice of

investigation. Extensions of time for

submitting responses to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against such

respondent.

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13269 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–856 (Final)]

Certain Ammonium Nitrate From

Russia

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Cancellation of hearing,

posthearing briefs, and final comments.

SUMMARY: On May 19, 2000, the

Department of Commerce informed the

Commission that a suspension

agreement had been signed in the

subject investigation. Accordingly, the

Commission hereby cancels the hearing

on the investigation currently scheduled

for May 25, 2000, the posthearing briefs

currently due on June 1, 2000, and the

final comments currently due on June

22, 2000. The Commission unanimously

determined that no earlier

announcement of this cancellation was

possible.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Taylor (202–708–4101), Office of

Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street SW,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that

information on this matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

Authority: This investigation is being

conducted under authority of title VII of the

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published

pursuant to section 207.21 of the

Commission’s rules (19 CFR § 207.21).

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13267 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–318 (Review)

and 731–TA–538 and 561 (Review)]

Sulfanilic Acid From China and India

Determinations

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject five-year reviews, the

United States International Trade

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)), that revocation of

the countervailing duty and

antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic

acid from China and India would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to an

industry in the United States within a

reasonably foreseeable time.

Background

The Commission instituted these

reviews on October 1, 1999 (64 FR

53412, October 1, 1999) and determined

on January 7, 2000 that it would

conduct expedited reviews (65 FR 2645,

January 18, 2000). The Commission

transmitted its determinations in these

reviews to the Secretary of Commerce

on May 18, 2000. The views of the

Commission are contained in USITC

Publication 3301 (May 2000), entitled

Sulfanilic Acid From China and India:

Investigations Nos. 701–TA–318

(Review) and 731–TA–538 and 561

(Review).

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13268 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Agency Information Collection

Activities; Current Collection;

Comments Requests

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of

Investigation, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection

Under Review; Extension of a Currently

Approved Collection: Hate Crime

Incident Report and Quarterly Hate

Crime Report

The proposed information collection

is published to obtain comments from

the public and affected agencies.

Comments are encouraged and will be

accepted until July 25, 2000.

Request written comments and

suggestions from the public and affected

agencies concerning the proposed

collection of information. Comments

should address one or more of the

following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and