alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 229 

Honoring Willliam Clifton France. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself and Mr. MARTINEZ) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Willliam Clifton France. 

Whereas William Clifton France, NASCAR patriarch and visionary, was born on April 4, 1933, in Washington, DC; 

Whereas Mr. France grew up in the formative years of stock 

car racing, living and learning every detail of the sport 

from his own experiences and those of his father, William 

Henry Getty France, known as ‘‘Big Bill’’ because of his 

6-foot-5 stature, who was the founder and first president 

of NASCAR; 

Whereas, in 1972, William Clifton France replaced his father 

and became the second president of the world’s largest 

auto-racing sanctioning body; 

Whereas, during the 28-year tenure of Mr. France as president, and later chairman and chief executive officer, of 

NASCAR, NASCAR grew from a sport with regional apVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:03 Jun 08, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR229.ATS SR229

bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 229 ATS 

peal to draw more than 75,000,000 fans yearly and become the second-most popular sport on television in the 

United States; 

Whereas Mr. France worked in every role in stock car racing, 

from flagging events to scoring, promoting, serving as a 

steward, and even racing a few times in the 1950s; 

Whereas, before being named president of NASCAR, Mr. 

France served for 6 years as vice president of the organization; 

Whereas, in addition to his NASCAR duties, Mr. France 

served as chairman of the board of International Speedway Corporation, which oversees Daytona International 

Speedway, Darlington Raceway, Talladega Superspeedway, and other racing facilities around the country, and 

served as a director of the National Motorsports Council 

of ACCUS–FIA; and 

Whereas Mr. France was a visionary and served the motorsports industry with great distinction: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate extends its condolences to 

2 Mrs. Betty Jane France, Lesa France Kennedy, Brian 

3 France, and the entire France Family. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1178

Geophysical Data from offshore of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, Cat Island to Western Horn Island, Mississippi

----

Title Page / Contents / List of Figures / Conversion Factors and Datum / Abstract / Introduction / Data Acquisition and Processing / Data Catalog / Acknowledgments / References Cited

----

**Figure 4**. Data acquisition setup onboard the R/V *Tommy Munro*. From left to right, interferometric bathymetry (SwathPlus 234/468), sidescan-sonar (Klein 3000/3900), and 512i sub-bottom Chirp seismic-reflection acquisition computers. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                   LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                        Name Under Which
                                     Jurisdiction       such Subsidiary
        Name of Subsidiary         of Incorporation      Does Business
------------------------------     ----------------     ----------------

Lufkin Industries Canada, Ltd.     Province of Alberta,        Same
                                    Canada

P. T. Lufkin Indonesia             Republic of Indonesia       Same


Lufkin Industries FSC, Inc.        Barbados                    Same


Lufkin Industries Europe, Bv.      The Netherlands             Same


Lufkin Japan, L. L. C.             Japan                       Same


Lufkin France                      France                      Same


Lufkin Oilfield Services- Egypt    Egypt                       Same
(74 South. 1007)

#### SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. FAULK BROS.

(2 Div. 149.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 8, 1917.)

Appeal from City Court of *690iSelma; J. B. Evans, Judge.

Pettus, Fuller & Lapsley, of Selma, for appellant. S. F. Hobbs and Craig & Craig, all of Selma, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for want .of prosecution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA No. 00-946, MM Docket No. 99-237; RM-9663] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document denies a petition for rule making filed by Medina Radio Broadcasting Company requesting the allotment of Channel 296A at Medina, Texas.                         *See*64 FR 36324, July 6, 1999. This document in this proceeding questioned community status and requested commenting parties to present the Commission with information demonstrating community status. Based on the totality of evidence submitted, we do not believe that Medina qualifies as a community for allotment purposes and that it would not serve the public interest to make a channel allotment in response to Medina Radio's proposal.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-237, adopted April 19, 2000, and released April 25, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-13136 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Fw: Latest CMAS Preamble

Penny Lassiter to: Cortney_Higgins 10/15/2012 06:19 PM

Cc: Nick Parsons

Cortney,

Please find attached below a clean version and a redline version (the file that doesn't say "clean" in the title) 

showing the additional language on pg. 37 to add the citation to part 70 and to list the types of other rules that 

could have to be included in a title V permit. This is a redline from the previous clean version we sent to you at 

4:00 pm on 10/12.

Penny Lassiter

Group Leader

Refining and Chemicals Group (D205-01)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-5396

----- Forwarded by Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/15/2012 06:16 PM -----

From: Nick Parsons/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/15/2012 05:07 PM

Subject: Latest CMAS Preamble

EO12866_CMAS Recon 2060-AQ89Final_20121015 Clean.doc EO12866_CMAS Recon 2060-AQ89Final_20121015 Clean.doc EO12866_CMAS Recon 2060-AQ89Final_20121015.doc EO12866_CMAS Recon 2060-AQ89Final_20121015.doc

- -

Nick Parsons

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG

Research Triangle Park, NC

919.541.5372

parsons.nick@epa.gov

"No man is more important than the team." -Bo Schembechler
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA

- 20 15

- 3820 Directorate ID : 2014

- SW

- 024

- AD

Helicopter Model: V arious R estricted C ategory H elicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 607 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Re ason : The se actions are intended to detect a crack in the M/R blade

, and prevent failure of the

M/R blade and subsequent loss of helicopter control.

Costs :

 Cleaning and performing all inspections of a set of M/R blades (2 per

helicopter) require s a total of 1⁄2 work

- hour. No parts are needed. At an estimated 24

inspections a year, the cost is estimated at $1,032 per helicopter and $626,424 for the

U.S. fleet.

 Replacing an M/R blade require s 12 work hours

, and parts cost $90,656, for a

total cost of $91,676 per blade.

Executive Order 12866 :

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures :

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act :

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : Charles Harrison
§ 778.224 “Other similar payments”. ( a ) *General.* Sections 778.216 through 778.223 have enumerated and discussed the basic types of payments for which exclusion from the regular rate is specifically provided under section 7(e)(2) because they are not made as compensation for hours of work. Section 7(e)(2) also authorizes exclusion from the regular rate of other similar payments to an employee which are not made as compensation for his hours of employment. Such payments do not depend on hours worked, services rendered, job performance, or other criteria that depend on the quality or quantity of the employee's work. Conditions not dependent on the quality or quality of work include a reasonable waiting period for eligibility, the requirement to repay benefits as a remedy for employee misconduct, and limiting eligibility on the basis of geographic location or job position. Since a variety of miscellaneous payments are paid by an employer to an employee under peculiar circumstances, it was not considered feasible to attempt to list them. They must, however, be “similar” in character to the payments specifically described in section 7(e)(2). It is clear that the clause was not intended to permit the exclusion from the regular rate of payments such as most bonuses or the furnishing of facilities like board and lodging which, though not directly attributable to any particular hours of work are, nevertheless, clearly understood to be compensation for services.
( b ) *Examples of other excludable payments.* A few examples may serve to illustrate some of the types of payments intended to be excluded as “other similar payments”. ( 1 ) Sums paid to an employee for the rental of his truck or car.
( 2 ) Loans or advances made by the employer to the employee.
( 3 ) The cost to the employer of conveniences furnished to the employee such as: ( i ) Parking spaces and parking benefits;
( ii ) Restrooms and lockers;
( iii ) On-the-job medical care;
( iv ) Treatment provided on-site from specialists such as chiropractors, massage therapists, physical therapists, personal trainers, counselors, or Employee Assistance Programs; or
( v ) Gym access, gym memberships, fitness classes, and recreational facilities.
( 4 ) The cost to the employer of providing wellness programs, such as health risk assessments, biometric screenings, vaccination clinics (including annual flu vaccinations), nutrition classes, weight loss programs, smoking cessation programs, stress reduction programs, exercise programs, coaching to help employees meet health goals, financial wellness programs or financial counseling, and mental health wellness programs.
( 5 ) Discounts on employer-provided retail goods and services, and tuition benefits (whether paid to an employee, an education provider, or a student loan program).
( 6 ) Adoption assistance (including financial assistance, legal services, or information and referral services).
[84 FR 68775, Dec. 16, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLIDC00000.L11500000.MO0000.241A.0; 4500022635]


Notice of Public Meeting, Coeur d'Alene District Resource 
Advisory Council Meeting; Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Coeur 
d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: September 13, 2011. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end 
no later than 2:30 p.m. The public comment period will be held from 10 
a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at the Blue Creek Bay 
Recreation Site located six miles east of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho off of 
Interstate 90 exit 22.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Endsley, RAC Coordinator, BLM 
Coeur d'Alene District, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815 
or telephone at (208) 769-5004.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member RAC advises the Secretary of 
the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Idaho. The agenda will include a site visit to the developed 
recreation site at Blue Creek Bay and the historic Mullan Trail Road. 
The meeting will also include discussion about vegetation treatment 
projects in the Coeur d'Alene District. Additional agenda topics or 
changes to the agenda will be announced in local press releases. More 
information is available at http://www.blm.gov/id/st/en/res/resource_advisory.html.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the RAC in advance of or at the meeting. Each formal RAC 
meeting will also have time allocated for receiving public comments. 
Depending upon the number of persons wishing to comment and time 
available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: July 29, 2011.
Gary D. Cooper,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2011-20125 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
CONTAINED IN THIS FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         195,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      286
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,693
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,535
<SALES>                                            286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   286
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,152)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.78)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13306]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of Issuance of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Standards (SFFAS) No. 18).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. No. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as 
amended in October, 1999, notice is hereby given that the Federal 
Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued Statement of 
Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) No. 18, Amendments to 
Accounting Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees in SFFAS No. 
2.
    The Board approved the Statement in February 2000, and submitted it 
to FASAB principals for a 90-day review. The review period closed on 
May 19, 2000.
    SFFAS No. 18 provides the following new requirements to improve 
financial reporting for subsidy costs and performance of Federal credit 
programs:
    <bullet> Report subsidy reestimates in two distinct components: the 
interest rate reestimate and the technical/default reestimate. The 
former is a reestimate due to a change in interest rates used in 
calculating the subsidy expense. The latter is a reestimate due to 
changes made in projected cash flows after reevaluating all the risk 
factors as of the financial statement date.
    <bullet> Display a reconciliation on an entity-wide basis between 
the beginning and the ending balances of the subsidy cost allowance for 
direct loans and the liability for loan guarantees, reported in an 
entity's balance sheet.
    <bullet> Provide a narrative to disclose and discuss events and 
changes in economic conditions and legislation that have had a 
significant and measurable effect on the subsidy costs of direct loans 
and loan guarantees.
    The standards prescribed in SFFAS No. 18 are effective for periods 
beginning after September 30, 2000. Hard copies of the statement will 
be mailed to the FASAB mailing list. It is also available on the FASAB 
web site at www.financenet.gov/fasab.htm or by calling 202-512-7350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 441 G 
St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-
7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463.

    Dated: May 23, 2000.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-13306 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
#### § 552.3 Domestic service employment.

The term *domestic service employment* means services of a household nature performed by an employee in or about a private home (permanent or temporary). The term includes services performed by employees such as companions, babysitters, cooks, waiters, butlers, valets, maids, housekeepers, nannies, nurses, janitors, laundresses, caretakers, handymen, gardeners, home health aides, personal care aides, and chauffeurs of automobiles for family use. This listing is illustrative and not exhaustive.

[78 FR 60557, Oct. 1, 2013]
#### O’CONNELL etc v NOBLE

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas Co

No 2273.

Decided Jan. 27, 1930

Crin C. Clement, Toledo, for O’Connell, etc.

Rupert Holland, Toledo, for Noble.

LLOYD, J.

Plaintiff, as plaintiff in error, now seeks to reverse the judgment of dismissal entered as to the defendant in error Cyrus W. Noble. Defendant in error contends that the cause of action as stated in the second amended petition shows that no professional relationship of physician and patient existed as between him and the plaintiff in error; that he was an em*118ploye and assistant of Dr. Gowing and therefore these two, Noble and Gowing, may not be joined as defendants in an action by plaintiff in error for the alleged wrongful act. The petition alleges that these two defendants “jointly and concurrently participated” in the alleged wrongful acts resulting in the injury of which plaintiff complains, the wrongful acts as pleaded being unrelated to the employment as to the administration of the an-aesthetic. • An agent is personally liable to another for his own misfeasance and positive wrong, and we are therefore of the opinion that the demurrers were erroneously sustained. This court is of the further opinion that the plaintiff in error, having elected in the court of common pleas, to proceed against Gowing, thereby waived her right to proceed against both defendants. Had she not made this election, and the court had dismissed her petition as to both defendants, this court in appropriate error proceedings would have reversed the judgment and remanded the cause. However, for the reason stated, the judgment under review will be affirmed.

Williams and Richards, JJ., concur.