alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Her & Be 427, aeta i&th iuljial4tur8 - validity of pxwvielm for revorsian bf abrpluil 

fee6 to th8 Cwxw31 dsvenue 

hlld. 

*la Is the provirion of the General %pprapriation Bill of 1339, protidi for tha reversion 

of surplu* fee6 and unextmded 34 loncee to the 

Gmer4l r?evenu* FM4 violative of 50ation 7 of 

krticrle 8 of tho_Coxmtltutlan of TcxasT 

*2* If the ourplua ti unaxponded baloneea 

remub&q an band attho end of the fiscal gear 

do :wt revert to r&m Qenera.l itrtwnue IruIil, then 

ulll suuh euqplua yrrd umxpend~d b&maw ret&in 

their oharwter as au& MS YE to be subjelrt to 

tbo juridiotion ef the Lia;itrrd Poyamnte 3oard 

after the bo@uting of the second year of the 

bfannius, or w&l1 mcb surpluses or unexpended 

beianoes be treated slipply a8 M initial colloetlan 

for the swond year of tha biunniuor?" 

Artlcl~e 352, 

48 fcUm#61 

i?aviaed :Xx41 Xatutar, 1925, provliee 
lionarable be Btady, Pam 2 

tberaSor~~ eh8l.l be made by the Cemaimioner upon 

the bank8 exmlned in ion to 8864ta or 

resouraes held by the upon the datea of 

the axmlwtien of tha ruloua banks," 

&rt*ale 363, fbviaad Civil Zkatutes, 1925, groridea 

aa f4Blimu8r 

*hll fund8 colleoted m exaaination feee 

6ball be paid by tba Cma&a8ieaer dirwctly into 

l The exp me4 8 o lt o x nin8tio a a nd 

o f th* Co mti8a io wr in ea foro ing the prov&lona 

ar tdlis tit1.r, aball be paid upoa the cortifiU6t8 Of tb0 copraiMiOCIU b WUFUlt Of the 

Ccmtmller upon the State Zreamr~.~ 

elude* thsr 

Sanu%o Bill 427, A4t8 of the 4&h lagfslotura, LIP 

folfouiag a8 a l peeial rider followiry tha approprlttioa fad0 for the State BudrIng Dwartuntr 

"3uhj~t t% tho limitationa nt forth in 

rho provisions at the *ab of tbi8 Act, all qqw9- 

priatiezu herein iaado .fer the State &akin; 3e- 

&wrtaMt*llbe 

ac 

id out OJ their m*i*r, &nd - 

tbo C~~oller ll redwe U8 upwaditure8 

m a * 50s tu l xuoad the wtuel racoipts OOlLocted 

. l l î 

The gonenl rldora pet&tat0 *aate BillJb2?, Aoto 

of the Cbtlk Legiolattue, in t &. $amgrapat s$yled %id.tatioa 

6if Payment*@, irkeludes the follaldn& Mntow~r 

- 

*All 8ur 

OF otker wai F' 

w f-8, ro~elptr, apeuial &nda, 

able fund8 dll had ut the end of 

each par of the bieuniua &all revert to tbo 

Central Eweme iimd af thir Stats wloms otherwise provided hernln.w 

ikrsction 7 of irticfa B of the ComtitutXon of the 

State of Texas roads: 

"The Logimluture eh6ll not have power to 

borrw or ia MY r8amu divers &oar itm purpso 

any S~wa3l Iund t&it may, or ollgbt to, c;:me 

ir.to the Troesury; and sliall atie it penal for 

rir:y peraan or gxwmx~ri to il~rrcw, withhold, or tn 
i
ISSUE DATE: January 7, 2008 

PROGRAM INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. P08-01 

FROM: KEVIN G. STRICKLIN

 Administrator for 

 Coal Mine Safety and Health 

SUBJECT: Change to Respirable Coal Mine Dust Enforcement Program 

Who needs this information?

This Program Information Bulletin (PIB) is applicable to coal mine operators, coal 

miners, contractors, coal mine inspectors, and other interested parties. 

What is the purpose of this bulletin?

This PIB explains changes related to the use of operator respirable dust samples 

submitted under the requirements of 30 C.F.R. parts 70, 71 and 90 on or after January 1, 

2008. 

Information

Coal mine operators collect and submit respirable coal mine dust samples in 

conformance with the requirements of 30 C.F.R. parts 70, 71 and 90. Effective January 1, 

2008, MSHA will hold operator-submitted samples in a “staging file” to allow the valid 

samples to be credited toward the sampling requirements in the order in which the 

operator collected the samples. 

For example: A MMU is being sampled for the 5 bimonthly samples. Two samples are 

collected on each of 3 days (MMU is operated two shifts each day). Under the current 

system, the six samples are credited to the regulatory requirement in the order they are 

received by the computer system, which could result in the following: 

Sample Number Sample Date Sample Start Time

1 01/06/08 07 

2 01/06/08 15 

3 01/07/08 07 
2 

4 01/08/08 07 

5 01/08/08 15 

6 01/07/08 15 (voided) 

The “staging” will select the samples so that the samples utilized to satisfy the 

bimonthly requirements would be ordered by date and time of sampling, as follows: 

Sample Number Sample Date Sample Start Time

1 01/06/08 07 

2 01/06/08 15 

3 01/07/08 07 

4 01/07/08 15 

5 01/08/08 07 

6 01/08/08 15 (voided) 

What is the background for this PIB?

MSHA has been requested to credit operator-collected samples for requirements of 

30 C.F.R. parts 70, 71 and 90 in the order in which the samples were collected. The 

computer systems used by MSHA have now been reprogrammed to accomplish this 

function. 

What is MSHA’s authority for this PIB?

30 C.F.R. Pts. 70, 71, and 90 

Is this PIB on the Internet?

This PIB may be viewed on the Internet by accessing the MSHA home page at 

http://www.msha.gov “Compliance Info” and “Program Information Bulletins.” 

Who is the MSHA contact for this PIB?

Coal Mine Safety and Health 

Robert A. Thaxton, (202) 693-9515 

E-mail: Thaxton.Robert@dol.gov

Who will receive this PIB?

MSHA Program Policy Manual Holders 

Coal Mine Operators 

Miner’s Representatives 

Contractors 

Special Interest Groups
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MANUEL LUEVANO BENITEZ,

AKA Jose Manuel Benitez Luevano,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 73180

Agency No. A075

- 118

- 868

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9, 2019 **

San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Jose Manuel Luevano Benitez (“ Luevano”) , a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal and denial of his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the

petition.

The BIA did not err in concluding that the evidence of Luevano’s alienage

that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) obtained during the raid of Sun

Valley Floral Farms was not obtained in violation of Luevano’s constitutional rights

or any laws or regulations

. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that

Luevano was not seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when he was

questioned during the raid. See I.N.S. v. Delgado , 466 U.S. 210, 220 (1984).

Through their consensual interactions with Luevano, ICE agents developed the

“reasonable suspicion” necessary to seize him and further investigate his

immigration status. See Orhorhaghe v. I.N.S. , 38 F.3d 488, 49 7 (9th Cir. 1994).

Thus, Luevano’ s Fourth Amendment claims fail. Moreover, although Luevano

claims the BIA failed to address his Fifth Amendment claim, the BIA concluded that

the conditions under which Luevano was seized and questioned were not sufficiently

coercive that admitting the Fo rm I

- 213 would violate his Fifth Amendment rights.

Substantial evidence supports this conclusion. C f. Choy v. Barber , 279 F.2d 642,

646

– 47 (9th Cir. 1960).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 5.30 Types of wage determinations. ( a ) When fringe benefits are prevailing for various classes of laborers and mechanics in the area of proposed construction, such benefits are includable in any Davis-Bacon wage determination. The examples contained in paragraph (c) of this section demonstrate how fringe benefits may be listed on wage determinations in such cases.
( b ) Wage determinations do not include fringe benefits for various classes of laborers and mechanics whenever such benefits do not prevail in the area of proposed construction. When this occurs, the wage determination will contain only the basic hourly rates of pay which are prevailing for the various classes of laborers and mechanics. An illustration of this situation is contained in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) The following illustrates examples of the situations discussed in paragraph (a) and (b) of this section:
Figure 1 to Paragraph (c) [88 FR 57745, Aug. 23, 2023]
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                (Thousands of $)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  1996        1995        1994        1993        1992
                                                  ----        ----        ----        ----        ----
<S>                                            <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>      
Earnings:
  Income before cumulative effect of a change
   in accounting principle per statements
   of income ................................  $ 107,941   $  83,184   $  61,689   $  90,535   $  73,793
Add:
  Federal income taxes - current ............     34,019      35,824      30,926      42,091      13,785
  State income taxes - current ..............      7,589       8,795       7,726      12,954       3,140
  Deferred Federal income taxes - net .......     19,816       4,261        (950)      4,712      20,441
  Deferred State income taxes - net .........      6,648       2,788         956         226       8,470
  Investment tax credit - net ...............     (4,406)     (4,742)     (4,619)     (7,821)     (5,033)
  Fixed charges .............................     42,198      43,550      44,665      49,640      52,196
                                               ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
   Earnings .................................    213,805     173,660     140,393     192,337     166,792
                                               ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
Fixed Charges:
  Interest Charges per statements of income..     40,242      41,918      42,856      47,496      49,833
  Add:
   Interest income (1) ......................        409        --          --          --             4
   One-third of rentals charged to
    operating expense (2) ...................      1,547       1,632       1,809       2,144       2,359
                                               ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
      Fixed charges .........................  $  42,198   $  43,550   $  44,665   $  49,640   $  52,196
                                               ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ..........       5.07        3.99        3.14        3.87        3.20
                                               =========   =========   =========   =========   =========
</TABLE>

NOTE:
(1) Interest income earned on pollution control revenue bond proceeds held and
    invested by trustees - netted against interest charges above.
(2) In the Company's opinion, one-third of rentals represents a reasonable
    approximation of the interest factor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             655
<SECURITIES>                                    30,211
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                     21,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,033
<PP&E>                                         243,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 177,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,792    
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,925
<SALES>                                        225,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,974
<CGS>                                          188,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  211,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

Razorfish, Inc.

Chief Financial Officers Certification

In connection with the periodic report of Razorfish, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the interim period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John J. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.



|Date: November 13, 2002 | By: | /s/ JOHN J. ROBERTS                     | 
|----------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------- | 
|                        |     |                                         | 
|                        |     | John J. Roberts Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-46953 and Form S-8 No. 333-01102) pertaining to the 401(k)
Savings Plan of Lynch Corporation and Participating Employers and the Lynch
Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, respectively, of our report dated April
9, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Lynch Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.



                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                ------------------------------
                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Providence, Rhode Island
April 12, 2004
1978

Report on Survey of U.S.

Shipbuilding and Repair Facilities

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Maritime Administration
Exhibit
10.5.3


 


	 	April 7, 2015


 


PAXmed, Inc.


420 Lexington
Avenue, Suite 300


New York, New
York 10170


 


CRT Capital
Group LLC


262 Harbor Drive


Stamford, Connecticut
06902


 


Re:        Initial Public
Offering


 


Gentlemen:


 


This letter is being delivered
to you in connection with the initial public offering (“IPO”) of PAXmed Inc. (the “Company”) to be underwritten
by several underwriters for whom CRT Capital Group LLC will serve as representative (collectively, the “Underwriters”).  In
order to induce the Company and the Underwriters to proceed with the IPO, and in recognition of the benefit that such IPO will
confer upon the undersigned as beneficial owner of securities of the Company, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby agrees as follows:


 


1.          In
order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, until such time as the undersigned
ceases to be an officer of the Company, he will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other
person or entity, any suitable business opportunity which may be reasonably required to be presented to the Company, subject to
any pre-existing fiduciary and contractual obligations the undersigned might have.


 


2.          The
undersigned has full right and power, without violating any agreement by which he is bound, to enter into this letter agreement.


 


3.          This
letter agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without
giving effect to conflicts of law principles that would result in the application of the substantive laws of another jurisdiction.  The
undersigned hereby (i) agrees that any action, proceeding or claim against him arising out of or relating in any way to this letter
agreement (a “Proceeding”) shall be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York of the
United States of America for the Southern District of New York, and irrevocably submits to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction
shall be exclusive, (ii) waives any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


forum and (iii) irrevocably agrees to appoint
Graubard Miller as agent for the service of process in the State of New York to receive, for the undersigned and on his behalf,
service of process in any Proceeding.  


 


4.          The
undersigned acknowledges and understands that the Underwriters and the Company will rely upon the agreements, representations and
warranties set forth herein in proceeding with the IPO.


 


	 	Brian J. deGuzman, MD
	 	Print Name
	 	 
	 	/s/ Brian J. deGuzman
	 	Signature


 




    	2
(79 South. 878)

#### BOYKIN v. STATE.

(7 Div. 544.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 23, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33323-33324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12940]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request 
for OMB review and approval of the information collection system 
described below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Notices Required of Government Securities Dealers or Brokers 
(Insured State Nonmember Banks).
    OMB Number: 3064-0093.
    Form Number: G-FIN, G-FINW, G-FIN-4, G-FIN-5
    Annual Burden:
Estimated annual number of respondents: 110.
Estimated time per response: 1 hour.
Average annual burden hours: 110 hours.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: July 31, 2000.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before June 22, 2000 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

[[Page 33324]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Government Securities Act of 1986 
requires all financial institutions acting as government securities 
brokers and dealers to notify their federal regulatory agencies of 
their broker-dealer activities, unless exempted from the notice 
requirement by Treasury department regulation.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12940 Filed 5-22-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34461-34462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-363-004]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 23, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 19,2000, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the following revised tariff sheet to become effective April 1, 
2000.

Second Revised Sheet No. 308

    Equitrans states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order issued on May 8, 2000. The Commission found that 
the filing contained a duplicate numbered tariff sheet First Revised 
Sheet No. 308 which should have been paginated Second Revised Sheet No. 
308. Also, the tariff sheet did not list GISB standards 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 
for which an extension was granted. As required by the Commission, 
Equitrans hereby files the enclosed tariff sheet in compliance with the 
May 8 Order, to correct the tariff pagination and incorporate the 
omitted GISB standards.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make

[[Page 34462]]

protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-13361 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M