alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ensuring Continued U.S. Soybean Exports to China

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Plant Protection and Quarantine 

United States Department of Agriculture

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), working closely with federal agencies that facilitate grain 

exports and affected grain industry stakeholder groups, has developed a comprehensive and practical plan for 

reducing the presence of weed seeds of quarantine concern to China in U.S. soybean shipments. The plan is a 

systems approach that includes a number of measures to be applied across the soybean supply chain and in China 

to effectively reduce plant pest risk. 

Implementing the Systems Approach

Participants across the U.S. grain supply chain and in China will be responsible for implementing the systems 

approach, beginning January 1, 2018. 

On Farm

USDA’s Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service (APHIS), 

working with federal, state, and 

university experts, will develop 

specific recommendations based on 

weed seed control best practices. 

The recommendations will 

include production and harvesting 

measures designed to reduce weed 

seed contamination at the farm 

level. APHIS will provide these 

recommendations to U.S. soybean 

producers before the 2018 growing 

season begins.

At Export

USDA’s Federal Grain Inspection 

Service (FGIS) will sample Chinabound soybean shipments and 

analyze foreign material to monitor 

for weed seeds in U.S. bulk and 

container shipments. When FGIS 

determines that a consignment 

exceeds 1 percent foreign material, 

APHIS will include an additional 

declaration on the phytosanitary 

certificate that says: “This 

consignment exceeds 1 percent 

foreign material.” This action will 

allow all U.S. soybean exports to 

China to continue without interruption 

until the United States is able to fully 

implement the other parts of the 

systems approach during the 2018 

crop year.

In China

China’s General Administration of 

Quality Supervision, Inspection and 

Quarantine (AQSIQ) has agreed 

to expedite agricultural clearance 

of shipments with 1 percent or less 

foreign material. They will determine 

whether any phytosanitary measures 

including inspection, cleaning, 

treatment or other protective actions 

may be appropriate to mitigate pest 

risk in shipments with more than 

1 percent foreign material. AQSIQ 

will not hold or unnecessarily delay 

incoming shipments based solely on 

the volume of foreign material.

USDA and AQSIQ will evaluate the effectiveness of the systems approach in December 2019, with a mid-point 

assessment in December 2018.

Getting the Word Out

USDA will work with federal and state agencies that facilitate U.S. grain exports, Extension, and affected industry 

stakeholder groups to create broad awareness about the systems approach. Interested stakeholders may also 

subscribe to APHIS’ Stakeholder Registry for the latest updates.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Issued December 2017
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40642 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

THOMAS EARL WRIGHT, also known as Pac, also known as Pacman

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 129

- 2

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Thomas Earl Wright has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Wright h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 2, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40642 Document: 00514538384 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/02/2018No. 17

- 40642

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40642 Document: 00514538384 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/02/2018
[669 NE2d 1111, 646 NYS2d 789]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John A. Ceresoli, Appellant.

Argued June 6, 1996;

decided June 28, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank Policelli,*Utica, for appellant.

*Michael A. Arcuri, District Attorney*of Oneida County, Utica *(Timothy P. Fitzgerald*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*926Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a forged instrument and with the theft of $3,500 from the Toccolana Club, a private social club in Rome, New York. After his conviction for grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30), defendant moved pursuant to CPL 330.30 to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct involving a single seated juror. During voir dire, the juror, a resident of Rome, was asked whether he was "familiar with members of the Toccolano Club.” The juror responded: "I just know where it is, not really, no.” It was subsequently established that the juror had decades earlier himself been a nominal member of the club, and two of his relatives were or had been members.

After a hearing on defendant’s motion, the trial court found there was no improper conduct on the part of the juror, and further that the juror’s conduct had not "affected a substantial right of the defendant” (CPL 330.30 [2]). The Appellate Division affirmed. The trial court’s undisturbed factual finding has support in the record and, like the alleged excessiveness of defendant’s sentence, is beyond the scope of our review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-22591) pertaining to The Liberty Corporation Retirement and
Savings Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30151) pertaining
to The Performance Incentive Compensation Program, and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84938) pertaining to The Liberty Corporation
Retirement and Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2002
of our report dated February 4, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of the Liberty Corporation included in the
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|                                          |  |                      
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                                          |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Greenville, South Carolina
March 24, 2003 |  |                      

45
§ 778.306 Salary reductions in short workweeks. ( a ) The reductions in pay described in § 778.304(a)(4) are not, properly speaking, “deductions” at all. If an employee is compensated at a fixed salary for a fixed workweek and if this salary is reduced by the amount of the average hourly earnings for each hour lost by the employee in a short workweek, the employee is, for all practical purposes, employed at an hourly rate of pay. This hourly rate is the quotient of the fixed salary divided by the fixed number of hours it is intended to compensate. If an employee is hired at a fixed salary of $200 for a 40-hour week, his hourly rate is $5. When he works only 36 hours he is therefore entitled to $180. The employer makes a “deduction” of $20 from his salary to achieve this result. The regular hourly rate is not altered.
( b ) When an employee is paid a fixed salary for a workweek of variable hours (or a guarantee of pay under the provisions of section 7(f) of the Act, as discussed in §§ 778.402 through 778.414), the understanding is that the salary or guarantee is due the employee in short workweeks as well as in longer ones and “deductions” of this type are not made. Therefore, in cases where the understanding of the parties is not clearly shown as to whether a fixed salary is intended to cover a fixed or a variable workweek the practice of making “deductions” from the salary for hours not worked in short weeks will be considered strong, if not conclusive, evidence that the salary covers a fixed workweek.
[33 FR 986, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended at 46 FR 7314, Jan. 23, 1981]
#### § 500.226 Service upon attorneys for the Department of Labor—number of copies.

Two copies of all pleadings and other documents required for any administrative proceeding provided herein shall be served on the attorneys for the Department of Labor. One copy shall be served on the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, and one copy on the Attorney representing the Department in the proceeding.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, John Busshaus, of Wizzard Software Corporation (the "small business issuer"), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB-A1 of the small business issuer;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:3/17/08By:/s/ John BusshausJohn Busshaus    Chief Financial Officer
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

OVTlOJG SYMBOL

110"'-14

mnAL5/5IG ~

/. r:</"'y"hi

ATE '

J-27' -10

fixed leading edge adjacent to the inboard end of slats 4 and 7 that are too close to the h

portion of the engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent fuel leaking onto an engine an

immediately outbomd of the nacelles at slats 4 and 7. This AD results from reports of oo<l"gSyml><>'

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all ModeJ 757

Ainvorthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes

Federal Aviation Administration

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (Ff.-A), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

Model 757 airplanes in service that have drain holes and unsealed panel assemblies in th

airplanes. This AD requires changing the lower fixed leading edge panel assemblies

14 CFR Part 39

INlTIAlSISIG

~ocl{ct No. FAA-2010-0483j Directorate Identifier 201O-NM-065-ADj Amendmen DJtl: .

1t-50:L -23-13 m _

'3~**; AD 2010-J ~~ho

ROVT1NG SYMBOL

R1N 2120-AA64

a consequent fire.

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DA YS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of

certain publication listed in the AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF I

'"

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

OlfnNG SYMBOL

OVTlNG SYMBOL
[4910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATlON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0483; Directorate Identifier 2010MNM-065-AD; Amendmen

. 39-*"; AD 2010-]

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Model?5?

airplanes. "Ibis AD requires changing the lower fixed leading edge panel assemblies

immediately outboard of the nacelles at slats 4 and 7. This AD results from reports of

ft-01\1-i\l~

IrJmALSISIG

DR "

DATE

s~lJo

OUTING $YM60l

I\0rn-14

IrilTIALSISIG ::,(lT Hk" ".t.i

,~

}-zy-/O

DATE

Rou"o~ S~m""l

/W.

Model 757 airplanes in service that have drain holes and unsealed panel assemblies in th mALSIS1G

fixed leading edge adjacent to the inboard end of slats 4 and 7 that are too close to the hATE

portion of the engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent fuel leaking onto an engine an

a consequent fire.

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

O<JTlNG sYMllOL

,

,

NmAt.$/SIG

DATE

DUTlNCi SYM~Ol

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of'

NmAWS!G

certain publication listed in the AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DA YS AFTER DATE OF

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

INmALS'SlG

OllllN'G SYMilOL

b",<,----
#### § 531.57 Receiving the minimum amount “customarily and regularly.”

The employee must receive more than $30 a month in tips “customarily and regularly” in the occupation in which he is engaged in order to qualify as a tipped employee under section 3(t). If it is known that he always receives more than the stipulated amount each month, as may be the case with many employees in occupations such as those of waiters, bellhops, taxicab drivers, barbers, or beauty operators, the employee will qualify and the tip credit provisions of section 3(m) may be applied. On the other hand, an employee who only occasionally or sporadically receives tips totaling more than $30 a month, such as at Christmas or New Years when customers may be more generous than usual, will not be deemed a tipped employee. The phrase “customarily and regularly” signifies a frequency which must be greater than occasional, but which may be less than constant. If an employee is in an occupation in which he normally and recurrently receives more than $30 a month in tips, he will be considered a tipped employee even though occasionally because of sickness, vacation, seasonal fluctuations or the like, he fails to receive more than $30 in tips in a particular month.

[32 FR 13575, Sept. 28, 1967, as amended at 76 FR 18855, Apr. 5, 2011]
### Geology and ground-water resources of Baca County, Colorado

By: Thad Gerald McLaughlin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1256

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Gateway Distributors, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard A. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                           /s/Richard A. Bailey
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date: April 13, 2004


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Infowave  Software  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I Sal
Visca, a member of the Office of the President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the  requirements  of the Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  represents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                          /s/ Sal Visca
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Sal Visca
                                          Office of the President
                                          August 14, 2002
(77 South. 1004)

#### MYERS v. STATE.

(6 Div. 408.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Wm. E. Fort, Judge. Tom Myers was convicted of murder in the second degree, and he *696appeals.

Affirmed.

E. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of murder in the second degree,' and was duly sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of 20 years. This appeal is on the record with no bill of exceptions, a careful examination of which .fads to disclose any error of a reversible nature. The indictment upon which the defendant was tried is in due and regular form, a verdict of guilty, and a judgment of the court in conformity with the finding of the. jury. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.