Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 49729 

1See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Intent to Rescind Review in Part, 76 FR 7534 

(February 10, 2011) (Preliminary Results). 

2Petitioners are the American Furniture 

Manufactures Committee for Legal Trade and 

Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc. 

(Petitioners). 

3See Memorandum to the File regarding 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated March 7, 2011. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is extending the time 

limit for the final results of the 

administrative review of certain frozen 

warmwater shrimp (‘‘shrimp’’) from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’). The review covers the 

period February 1, 2009, through 

January 31, 2010. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 11, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Pulongbarit, Paul Walker, or Jerry 

Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4031, 

(202) 482–0413, or (202) 482–4047, 

respectively. 

Background 

On March 4, 2011, the Department 

published the preliminary results of the 

review of shrimp from Vietnam. See 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Preliminary Results, Partial Rescission, 

and Request for Revocation, In Part, of 

the Fifth Administrative Review, 76 FR 

12054 (March 4, 2011). The final results 

are currently due no later than August 

16, 2011. See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 36519 

(June 22, 2011). 

Statutory Time Limits 

In antidumping duty administrative 

reviews, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), requires the Department to make 

a final determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

120-day period to 180 days after the 

preliminary results if it determines it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within the foregoing time period. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Review 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the final results of this 

administrative review within the 120- 

day time limit, as currently extended, 

because the Department requires 

additional time to analyze issues in case 

and rebuttal briefs submitted by parties, 

including comments on surrogate 

country selection, the wage rate 

calculation, and shrimp surrogate value. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for 

completion of the final results of this 

review, which is currently due on 

August 16, 2011, by 15 days to 180 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results were published. Therefore, the 

final results are now due no later than 

August 31, 2011. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: August 5, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20435 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Final Rescission in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 10, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (Department) 

published in the Federal Register its 

preliminary results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on wooden bedroom furniture (WBF) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(PRC), covering the period January 1, 

2009 through December 31, 2009.1 We 

gave interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

After reviewing the interested parties’ 

comments, we made changes to our 

calculations for these final results of the 

review. The final dumping margins for 

this review are listed in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Review’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 11, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen or Rebecca Pandolph, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2769 and (202) 

482–3627, respectively. 

Background 

On March 11, 2011, the Department 

issued a memorandum finding that 

Dalian Huafeng Furniture Group Co., 

Ltd. (Huafeng) is the successor-ininterest to Dalian Huafeng Furniture 

Co., Ltd. for purposes of this proceeding 

and for the application of the 

antidumping law. 

Between March 14, 2011, and March 

22, 2011, Petitioners,2 Huafeng, 

Dongguan Great Reputation Furniture 

Co., Ltd., Home Meridian International, 

Inc, d/b/a Samuel Lawrence Furniture 

Co. and Pulaski Furniture Company 

(Home Meridian), Import Services, Inc., 

Hooker Furniture Corporation, Nantong 

Yangzi Furniture Co., Ltd. (Nantong 

Yangzi), and Dongguan Cambridge 

Furniture Co., Ltd. and Glory Oceanic 

Co., Ltd. (collectively Cambridge), 

Butler Woodcrafters, Inc., Barry Imports 

East Corp., and Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan 

Decoration Co., Ltd. (ZYD), submitted 

case briefs to the Department. On March 

24, 2011, the Department rejected a 

portion of Huafeng’s case brief due to 

the inclusion of untimely new factual 

information. On March 25, 2011, 

Huafeng resubmitted its case brief with 

the new factual information excluded. 

On March 28, 2011, Petitioners, 

Huafeng, Home Meridian, Import 

Services, Inc., Nantong Yangzi, and 

Cambridge filed rebuttal briefs with the 

Department. 

On March 7, 2011, the Department 

received surrogate value (SV) 

information from interested parties and 

placed SV information for truck freight 

on the record.3 On March 17, 2011, 

Petitioners filed information with the 

Department which they claimed 

rebutted, clarified, or corrected SV 

information placed on the record after 

the Preliminary Results of the review 

were issued. On March 21, 2011, the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49730 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 

4See Memorandum from Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Director, Office 4 to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations ‘‘Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: 

Untimely Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review of Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration Co., 

Ltd. dated May 20, 2011. 

5See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of the Time 

Limit for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 34043 (June 10, 

2011). 

6See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of the Time 

Limit for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 41215 (July 13, 2011). 

7For all changes to SVs, see the July 11, 2011 

Final Results Surrogate Value Memorandum. 

8For all corrections to ministerial errors, see the 

July 11, 2011 Final Results Analysis Memorandum. 

9See also the Final Results Analysis 

Memorandum. 

10A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-ofdrawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be 

in two or more sections), with one or two sections 

mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly 

larger chest; also known as a tallboy. 

11A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers 

usually composed of a base and a top section with 

drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest 

(often 15 inches or more in height). 

12A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, 

not more than four feet high, normally set on short 

legs. 

13A chest of drawers is typically a case 

containing drawers for storing clothing. 

14A chest is typically a case piece taller than it 

is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or 

Department requested that interested 

parties withhold comments regarding 

the SV for truck freight from their case 

briefs because it was considering 

whether to accept Petitioners’ March 17, 

2011, rebuttal SV submission. On April 

18, 2011, the Department rejected a 

portion of Petitioners’ March 17, 2011, 

rebuttal SV submission but allowed 

Petitioners to refile the submission 

without the rejected information. 

Petitioners submitted a redacted version 

of their March 17, 2011, rebuttal SV 

submission on April 19, 2011. On April 

18, 2011, the Department extended the 

deadline for case and rebuttal briefs 

regarding the valuation of truck freight 

until April 21, 2011, and April 25, 2011, 

respectively. On April 21, 2011, the 

Department received a case brief 

regarding truck freight from Petitioners. 

On April 25, 2011, Huafeng submitted a 

rebuttal brief regarding truck freight. 

On May 20, 2011, the Department 

issued a memorandum further 

explaining its decision in the 

Preliminary Results not to extend the 

time for Petitioners to withdraw their 

request for a review of ZYD.4 On May 

25, 2011, ZYD commented on this post 

preliminary memorandum. 

On June 10, 2011, the Department 

extended the time period for completing 

the final results of the instant 

administrative review.5 On July 13, 

2011, the Department further extended 

the time period for completing the final 

results of the instant administrative 

review.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this review 

are addressed in the Memorandum from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated July 

11, 2011, which is hereby adopted by 

this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). A list of the issues 

which parties raised and to which we 

responded in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached to this notice 

as an Appendix. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file in the Central 

Records Unit, Main Commerce Building, 

Room 7046, and is accessible on the 

Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn>. The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received, the Department has made the 

following changes: 

Surrogate Values 7

• We valued Huafeng’s plywood 

inputs based on Philippine imports of 

HTS subheading 4412.13.10. See 

Comment 7 of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

• We valued Huafeng’s self-adhesive 

tape inputs based on Philippine imports 

of HTS subheading 3919.10.90. See 

Comment 8 of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

• We valued Huafeng’s glue 

consumed as overhead based on 

Philippine imports of HTS subheading 

3506.91. See Comment 10 of the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

• We recalculated the surrogate 

financial ratios using additional 

financial statements that were provided 

after the Preliminary Results were 

issued and after changing our treatment 

of certain financial statement line items. 

See Comment 19 of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Ministerial Errors 8

• We corrected the calculation of 

indirect selling expenses deducted from 

U.S. price. See Comment 12 of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

• We corrected our conversion of 

square meters of oak veneer into cubic 

decimeters. See Comment 13 of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

• We removed the quantity of 

electricity consumed by the samples 

workshop from the quantity of 

electricity consumption allocated to 

subject merchandise. See Comment 2 of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Other Changes 9

• We calculated the per-unit 

brokerage and handling SV using a 

different weight. See Comment 6 of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

• We added the quantity of electricity 

consumed to the factors of production 

used in assembling cardboard cartons. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is January 

1, 2009, through December 31, 2009. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the order is 

WBF. WBF is generally, but not 

exclusively, designed, manufactured, 

and offered for sale in coordinated 

groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the 

individual pieces are of approximately 

the same style and approximately the 

same material and/or finish. The subject 

merchandise is made substantially of 

wood products, including both solid 

wood and also engineered wood 

products made from wood particles, 

fibers, or other wooden materials such 

as plywood, strand board, particle 

board, and fiberboard, with or without 

wood veneers, wood overlays, or 

laminates, with or without non-wood 

components or trim such as metal, 

marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other 

resins, and whether or not assembled, 

completed, or finished. 

The subject merchandise includes the 

following items: (1) Wooden beds such 

as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; 

(2) wooden headboards for beds 

(whether stand-alone or attached to side 

rails), wooden footboards for beds, 

wooden side rails for beds, and wooden 

canopies for beds; (3) night tables, night 

stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, 

mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, 

bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, 

wardrobes, vanities, chessers, 

chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; 

(4) dressers with framed glass mirrors 

that are attached to, incorporated in, sit 

on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chestson-chests,10 highboys,11 lowboys,12

chests of drawers,13 chests,14 door 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 49731 

without one or more doors for storing clothing. The 

piece can either include drawers or be designed as 

a large box incorporating a lid. 

15A door chest is typically a chest with hinged 

doors to store clothing, whether or not containing 

drawers. The piece may also include shelves for 

televisions and other entertainment electronics. 

16A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest 

of drawers normally used for storing undergarments 

and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached. 

17A hutch is typically an open case of furniture 

with shelves that typically sits on another piece of 

furniture and provides storage for clothes. 

18An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or 

wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, 

and with one or more drawers (either exterior below 

or above the doors or interior behind the doors), 

shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for 

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used 

to hold television receivers and/or other audiovisual entertainment systems. 

19As used herein, bentwood means solid wood 

made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to 

a curved shape by bending it while made pliable 

with moist heat or other agency and then set by 

cooling or drying. See CBP’s Headquarters Ruling 

Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976. 

20Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for 

the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24 

inches in width, 18 inches in depth, and 49 inches 

in height, including a minimum of 5 lined drawers 

lined with felt or felt-like material, at least one side 

door (whether or not the door is lined with felt or 

felt-like material), with necklace hangers, and a fliptop lid with inset mirror. See Issues and Decision 

Memorandum from Laurel LaCivita to Laurie 

Parkhill, Office Director, concerning ‘‘Jewelry 

Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in the Antidumping 

Duty Investigation of Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated August 

31, 2004. See also Wooden Bedroom Furniture From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Changed 

Circumstances Review, and Determination To 

Revoke Order in Part, 71 FR 38621 (July 7, 2006). 

21Cheval mirrors are any framed, tiltable mirror 

with a height in excess of 50 inches that is mounted 

on a floor-standing, hinged base. Additionally, the 

scope of the order excludes combination cheval 

mirror/jewelry cabinets. The excluded merchandise 

is an integrated piece consisting of a cheval mirror, 

i.e., a framed tiltable mirror with a height in excess 

of 50 inches, mounted on a floor-standing, hinged 

base, the cheval mirror serving as a door to a 

cabinet back that is integral to the structure of the 

mirror and which constitutes a jewelry cabinet line 

with fabric, having necklace and bracelet hooks, 

mountings for rings and shelves, with or without a 

working lock and key to secure the contents of the 

jewelry cabinet back to the cheval mirror, and no 

drawers anywhere on the integrated piece. The fully 

assembled piece must be at least 50 inches in 

height, 14.5 inches in width, and 3 inches in depth. 

See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Changed Circumstances 

Review and Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 

72 FR 948 (January 9, 2007). 

22Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture 

parts made of wood products (as defined above) 

that are not otherwise specifically named in this 

scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, wooden 

footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and 

wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess 

the essential character of wooden bedroom 

furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or 

unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified 

under HTSUS subheadings 9403.90.7005, 

9403.90.7010, or 9403.90.7080. 

23Upholstered beds that are completely 

upholstered, i.e., containing filling material and 

completely covered in sewn genuine leather, 

synthetic leather, or natural or synthetic decorative 

fabric. To be excluded, the entire bed (headboards, 

footboards, and side rails) must be upholstered 

except for bed feet, which may be of wood, metal, 

or any other material and which are no more than 

nine inches in height from the floor. See Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review and Determination to Revoke Order in Part, 

72 FR 7013 (February 14, 2007). 

24To be excluded the toy box must: (1) Be wider 

than it is tall; (2) have dimensions within 16 inches 

to 27 inches in height, 15 inches to 18 inches in 

depth, and 21 inches to 30 inches in width; (3) have 

a hinged lid that encompasses the entire top of the 

box; (4) not incorporate any doors or drawers; (5) 

have slow-closing safety hinges; (6) have air vents; 

(7) have no locking mechanism; and (8) comply 

with American Society for Testing and Materials 

(‘‘ASTM’’) standard F963–03. Toy boxes are boxes 

generally designed for the purpose of storing 

children’s items such as toys, books, and 

playthings. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review and Determination 

to Revoke Order in Part, 74 FR 8506 (February 25, 

2009). Further, as determined in the scope ruling 

memorandum ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from 

the People’s Republic of China: Scope Ruling on a 

White Toy Box,’’ dated July 6, 2009, the 

dimensional ranges used to identify the toy boxes 

that are excluded from the wooden bedroom 

furniture order apply to the box itself rather than 

the lid. 

25These HTSUS numbers, as well as the numbers 

in footnote 20, reflect the HTSUS numbers 

currently in effect. These numbers differ from those 

used in the last completed antidumping duty 

administrative review of WBF from the PRC 

because the HTSUS has been revised. 

26These HTSUS numbers were added to the 

scope in the 2009 Annual New Shipper Review of 

the proceeding. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 76 FR 

9747 (February 22, 2011). 

27 Id. 

chests,15 chiffoniers,16 hutches,17 and 

armoires;18 (6) desks, computer stands, 

filing cabinets, book cases, or writing 

tables that are attached to or 

incorporated in the subject 

merchandise; and (7) other bedroom 

furniture consistent with the above list. 

The scope of the order excludes the 

following items: (1) Seats, chairs, 

benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, 

stools, and other seating furniture; (2) 

mattresses, mattress supports (including 

box springs), infant cribs, water beds, 

and futon frames; (3) office furniture, 

such as desks, stand-up desks, computer 

cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and 

bookcases; (4) dining room or kitchen 

furniture such as dining tables, chairs, 

servers, sideboards, buffets, corner 

cabinets, china cabinets, and china 

hutches; (5) other non-bedroom 

furniture, such as television cabinets, 

cocktail tables, end tables, occasional 

tables, wall systems, book cases, and 

entertainment systems; (6) bedroom 

furniture made primarily of wicker, 

cane, osier, bamboo or rattan; (7) side 

rails for beds made of metal if sold 

separately from the headboard and 

footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in 

which bentwood parts predominate; 19

(9) jewelry armories; 20 (10) cheval 

mirrors; 21 (11) certain metal parts; 22

(12) mirrors that do not attach to, 

incorporate in, sit on, or hang over a 

dresser if they are not designed and 

marketed to be sold in conjunction with 

a dresser as part of a dresser-mirror set; 

(13) upholstered beds 23 and (14) toy 

boxes.24

Imports of subject merchandise are 

classified under subheadings 

9403.50.9042 and 9403.50.9045 25 of the 

U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) as ‘‘wooden * * * beds’’ 

and under subheading 9403.50.9080 of 

the HTSUS as ‘‘other * * * wooden 

furniture of a kind used in the 

bedroom.’’ In addition, wooden 

headboards for beds, wooden footboards 

for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and 

wooden canopies for beds may also be 

entered under subheading 9403.50.9042 

or 9403.50.9045 of the HTSUS as ‘‘parts 

of wood.’’ Subject merchandise may 

also be entered under subheadings 

9403.50.9041 or 9403.60.8081.26

Further, framed glass mirrors may be 

entered under subheading 

7009.92.100027 or 7009.92.5000 of the 

HTSUS as ‘‘glass mirrors * * * 

framed.’’ The order covers all WBF 

meeting the above description, 

regardless of tariff classification. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of this proceeding is dispositive. 

Separate Rates 

Companies Granted Separate Rates in 

the Preliminary Results 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that the following 

companies demonstrated their eligibility 

for separate-rate status: (1) Huafeng; (2) 

Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai; (3) 

Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd.; 

(4) Dongguan Kin Feng Furniture Co., 

Ltd.; (5) Dongguan Singways Furniture 

Co., Ltd.; (6) Dongguan Sunshine 

Furniture Co., Ltd.; (7) Hong Kong Da 

Zhi Furniture Co., Ltd., Dongguan 

Grand Style Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) 

Longkou Huangshan Furniture Factory; 

(9) Nanhai Baiyi Woodwork Co. Ltd.; 

(10) Nanjing Nanmu Furniture Co., Ltd.; 

(11) Season Furniture Manufacturing 

Co., Season Industrial Development Co.; 

(12) Shenyang Shining Dongxing 

Furniture Co., Ltd.; (13) Shenzhen Shen 

Long Hang Industry Co., Ltd.; (14) 

Wanhengtong Nueevder (Furniture) 

Manufacture Co., Ltd., Dongguan 

Wanengtong Industry Co., Ltd.; (15) 

Xilinmen Furniture Co., Ltd.; (16) 

Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration Co. 

Ltd., and (17) Zhangjiang Sunwin Arts 

& Crafts Co., Ltd. For these final results, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49732 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 

28See Preliminary Results; see also Notice of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value: Creatine Monohydrate From the People’s 

Republic of China, 64 FR 71104–05 (December 20, 

1999) (where the Department determined that a 

respondent that was wholly foreign-owned 

qualified for a separate rate). 

29See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 15. 

30See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 14. 

31See Preliminary Results. 

32See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 1. 

33See the Statement of Administrative Action 

accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 

H.R. Doc. 103–316 Vol. 1 at 870 (1994) (SAA). 

34See Id. 

35See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished From Japan, and Tapered 

Roller Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside 

Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan; 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of 

Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 

we continue to find that evidence 

placed on the record of this review 

demonstrates that these companies 

provided information that shows both a 

de jure and de facto absence of 

government control with respect to their 

respective exports of the merchandise 

under review and, thus, these 

companies are eligible for separate-rate 

status. 

With respect to the following 

companies that were not selected for 

individual examination in this review 

we continue to find they should be 

granted a separate rate because they are 

wholly owned by individuals or 

companies located in a market 

economy: (1) Cheng Meng Furniture 

(PTE) Ltd., Cheng Meng Decoration & 

Furniture (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (2) COE, 

Ltd; (3) Dongguan Hero Way Woodwork 

Co., Ltd., Dongguan Da Zhong 

Woodwork Co., Ltd., Hero Way 

Enterprises Ltd., Well Earth 

International Ltd.; (4) Dongguan 

Liaobushangdun Huada Furniture 

Factory, Great Rich (HK) Enterprise Co., 

Ltd.; (5) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., 

Eurosa Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd.; (6) 

Garri Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., 

Molabile International, Inc. Weei Geo 

Enterprise Co., Ltd.; (7) Hualing 

Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House 

Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell 

Investments Ltd., Tony House Industries 

Co., Ltd.; (8) Jardine Enterprise, Ltd.; (9) 

Winny Overseas, Ltd; (10) Meikangchi 

(Nantong) Furniture Company Ltd.; and 

(11) Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., 

Ltd. As wholly foreign-owned 

companies, we have no evidence 

indicating that these companies are 

under the control of the PRC 

government. Therefore, a separate-rate 

analysis is not necessary to determine 

whether these companies are 

independent from government 

control.28

Since the Preliminary Results, the 

only comments received regarding our 

separate rate determinations were from 

parties noting that the Department failed 

to mention Dongguan Cambridge 

Furniture Co., Ltd., Glory Oceanic Co., 

Ltd. and Dongguan Great Reputation 

Furniture Co., Ltd. in its preliminary 

separate rate determination. Parties 

claimed that the Department apparently 

overlooked the separate rate 

submissions by these companies. We 

agree that in the Preliminary Results, we 

inadvertently omitted Dongguan 

Cambridge Furniture Co., Ltd., Glory 

Oceanic Co., Ltd. and Dongguan Great 

Reputation Furniture Co., Ltd. from the 

list of companies that had demonstrated 

their eligibility to receive a separate 

rate.29 Therefore, for the final results, 

we have granted these companies a 

separate rate. 

Companies Not Providing Separate Rate 

Certifications or Applications 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that the following nine companies or 

company groupings for which the 

Department initiated the instant review 

did not provide a separate rate 

certification or application and therefore 

have not demonstrated their eligibility 

for separate rate status in this 

administrative review: 

• Dongguan Creation Furniture Co., 

Ltd., Creation Industries Co., Ltd. 

• Foshan Guanqiu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Jiangsu Weifu Group Fullhouse 

Furniture Mfg. Corp. 

• Link Silver Ltd. (V.I.B.), Forward Win 

Enterprises Company Limited, 

Dongguan Haoshun Furniture Ltd. 

• Nantong Yushi Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Aosen Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Shenzhen Xiande Furniture Factory 

• Tarzan Furniture Industries, Ltd., 

Samso Industries Ltd. 

• Tianjin Master Home Furniture 

In the Preliminary Results, we also 

found that (1) Nantong Yangzi, (2) 

Zhongshan Gainwell Furniture Co., Ltd., 

and (3) Dongguan Landmark Furniture 

Products Ltd. shipped subject 

merchandise during the POR, had not 

filed separate rate certifications or 

applications and thus we treated these 

companies as part of the PRC-wide 

entity. Since the Preliminary Results, 

aside from Nantong Yangzi,30 no 

interested parties submitted comments 

regarding the companies listed above. In 

Comment 14 of the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, we 

addressed Nantong Yangzi’s comments 

and determined not to rescind the 

review with respect to Nantong Yangzi. 

Therefore, for the final results, we 

continue to treat these entities as part of 

the PRC–Wide entity. 

Adverse Facts Available (AFA) 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that in accordance with 

sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (C) and 776(b) 

of the Act, the use of AFA is appropriate 

for the PRC-wide entity. The 

Department assigned a dumping margin 

of 216.01 percent, the highest rate on 

the record of any segment of the 

proceeding to all companies that are 

part of the PRC-wide entity, as AFA.31

No interested party commented on this 

determination regarding the PRC-wide 

entity and we have made no changes 

from our Preliminary Results with 

respect to this issue. 

Also in the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that Huafeng failed to report 

certain sales and thus withheld 

necessary information within the 

meaning of section 776(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and failed to act to the best of its 

ability to comply with the Department’s 

requests for information within the 

meaning of section 776(b) of the Act. We 

therefore applied a dumping margin 

based on AFA to Huafeng’s unreported 

sales, pursuant to section 776(b) of the 

Act. As partial AFA, we applied to the 

unreported sales a margin of 216.01 

percent. Parties commented both on our 

decision to apply AFA and on our 

choice of the AFA rate applied to 

Huafeng. After considering these 

comments, we have continued to apply 

to Huafeng’s unreported sales an AFA 

margin of 216.01 percent.32

Corroboration of Secondary 

Information 

Section 776(c) of the Act provides 

that, when the Department relies on 

secondary information rather than on 

information obtained in the course of an 

investigation or review, it shall, to the 

extent practicable, corroborate that 

information from independent sources 

that are reasonably at its disposal. 

Secondary information is defined as 

information derived from the petition 

that gave rise to the investigation or 

review, the final determination 

concerning the subject merchandise, or 

any previous review under section 751 

of the Act concerning the subject 

merchandise.33 To corroborate means 

that the Department will satisfy itself 

that the secondary information to be 

used has probative value.34 To 

corroborate secondary information, the 

Department will, to the extent 

practicable, examine the reliability and 

relevance of the information to be 

used.35 Independent sources used to 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 49733 

(November 6, 1996) (unchanged in Tapered Roller 

Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 

Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered Roller 

Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, 

and Components Thereof, From Japan; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Termination in Part, 62 FR 11825 

(March 13, 1997)). 

36See the SAA at 870; see also Notice of 

Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: High and Ultra-High Voltage Ceramic 

Station Post Insulators from Japan, 68 FR 35627, 

35629 (June 16, 2003) (unchanged in Notice of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 

High and Ultra-High Voltage Ceramic Station Post 

Insulators from Japan, 68 FR 62560 (November 5, 

2003)). 

37See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the 

2004–2005 Semi-Annual New Shipper Reviews, 71 

FR 70739, 70741 (December 6, 2006) (2004–2005 

New Shipper Review). 

38See Fresh Cut Flowers From Mexico; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 61 FR 6812, 6814 (February 22, 1996) 

(where the Department disregarded the highest 

margin in that case as adverse best information 

available (the predecessor to facts available) 

because the margin was based on another 

company’s uncharacteristic business expense 

resulting in an unusually high margin). 

39See D&L Supply Co. v. United States, 113 F.3d 

1220, 1221 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (ruling that the 

Department will not use a margin that has been 

judicially invalidated). 

40See the Corroboration Memorandum dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

41 Dongguan Huangsheng Furniture Co., Ltd.’s 

only sales made during the POR were covered by 

a new shipper review for the period January 1, 

2009, through December 31, 2009. The new shipper 

review of this company was completed and 

therefore, these shipments are not subject to this 

administrative review. See Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Reviews, 76 FR 9747 (February 22, 2011). 

42Zhejiang Tianyi’s only sales made during the 

POR were covered by a new shipper review 

covering the period January 1, 2009, through June 

30, 2009 and thus are not subject to this review. See 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review, 75 FR 44764 (July 29, 

2010). 

corroborate such information may 

include, for example, published price 

lists, official import statistics and 

customs data, and information obtained 

from interested parties during the 

particular investigation or review.36

The 216.01 AFA rate that the 

Department is using in this review is a 

company-specific rate calculated in the 

2004–2005 New Shipper Review of the 

WBF order.37 No additional information 

has been presented in the current 

review which calls into question the 

reliability of this secondary information. 

Thus, we have determined that this 

secondary information continues to be 

reliable. With respect to the relevance 

aspect of corroboration, the Department 

will consider information reasonably at 

its disposal to determine whether a 

margin continues to have relevance. 

Where circumstances indicate that the 

selected margin is not appropriate as 

AFA, the Department will disregard the 

margin and determine an appropriate 

margin.38 Similarly, the Department 

does not apply a margin that has been 

discredited.39 To assess the relevancy of 

the rate used, the Department compared 

the transaction-specific margins 

calculated for Huafeng in the instant 

administrative review with the 216.01 

percent rate calculated in the 2004–2005 

New Shipper Review and found that the 

216.01 percent margin was within the 

range of the calculated margins on the 

record of the instant administrative 

review. Because the dumping margins 

used to corroborate the AFA rate are not 

unusually high dumping margins 

relative to the calculated rates 

determined for the cooperating 

respondent, the Department is satisfied 

that the dumping margins used for 

corroborative purposes reflect 

commercial reality because they are 

based upon real transactions that 

occurred during the POR and were 

subject to verification by the 

Department.40

Since the 216.01 percent margin is 

within the range of transaction-specific 

margins on the record of this 

administrative review, the Department 

has determined that the 216.01 percent 

margin continues to be relevant for use 

as an AFA rate for the PRC-wide entity 

in this administrative review. Also, 

because this rate is within the range of 

Huafeng’s transaction-specific margins 

in this review, we find the rate relevant 

to Huafeng’s unreported sales. 

As the adverse margin is both reliable 

and relevant, the Department has 

determined that it has probative value. 

Accordingly, the Department has 

determined that this rate meets the 

corroboration criterion established in 

section 776(c) of the Act. Huafeng has 

raised arguments with respect to the 

reliability and relevance of this rate, 

which are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 1. 

Final Partial Rescission of 

Administrative Review 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department stated its intent to rescind 

the administrative review with respect 

to the following companies because they 

all reported that they made no 

shipments during the POR. 

• Clearwise Company Limited 

• Dongguan Huangsheng Furniture Co., 

Ltd.41

• Dongguan Mu Si Furniture Co. Ltd. 

• Fleetwood Fine Furniture LP 

• Hainan Jong Bao Lumber Co. Ltd/ 

Jibbon Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

• Shanghai Fangjia Industry Co., Ltd. 

• Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc. 

• Golden Well International (HK) Ltd. 

• Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific and 

Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Zhejiang Tianyi’’) 42

No parties commented on our intent 

to rescind. Because there is no 

information or argument on the record 

of the current review that warrants 

reconsidering our intent to rescind, we 

are rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to the above-listed 

companies. 

Final Results of the Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average percentage margins 

exist for the POR: 

Exporter 

Antidumping 

Duty Percent 

Margin 

Dalian Huafeng Furniture Co., Ltd./Dalian Huafeng Furniture Group Co., Ltd ............................................................................... 41.75 

Baigou Crafts Factory of Fengkai .................................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Cambridge Furniture Co., Ltd., Glory Oceanic Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Cheng Meng Furniture (PTE) Ltd., Cheng Meng Decoration & Furniture (Suzhou) Co., Ltd ........................................................ 41.75 

COE, Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 41.75 

Dongguan Great Reputation Furniture Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Dongguan Hero Way Woodwork Co., Ltd., Dongguan Da Zhong Woodwork Co., Ltd., Hero Way Enterprises Ltd., Well Earth 

International Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Dongguan Kin Feng Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Dongguan Liaobushangdun Huada Furniture Factory , Great Rich (HK) Enterprise Co., Ltd ....................................................... 41.75 

Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 41.75 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49734 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 

Exporter 

Antidumping 

Duty Percent 

Margin 

Dongguan Sunshine Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd (Eurosa) ........................................................................................ 41.75 

Garri Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., Molabile International, Inc. Weei Geo Enterprise Co., Ltd ............................................... 41.75 

Hong Kong Da Zhi Furniture Co., Ltd., Dongguan Grand Style Furniture Co., Ltd ....................................................................... 41.75 

Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House Industries Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Jardine Enterprise, Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Longkou Huangshan Furniture Factory ........................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Meikangchi (Nantong) Furniture Company Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Nanhai Baiyi Woodwork Co. Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Nanjing Nanmu Furniture Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Season Furniture Manufacturing Co., Season Industrial Development Co .................................................................................... 41.75 

Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Shenzhen Shen Long Hang Industry Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 41.75 

Wanhengtong Nueevder (Furniture) Manufacture Co., Ltd., Dongguan Wanengtong Industry Co., Ltd ....................................... 41.75 

Winny Overseas, Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Xilinmen Furniture Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration Co. Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 41.75 

Zhangjiang Sunwin Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 41.75 

PRC–Wide Entity ............................................................................................................................................................................. 216.01 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. For 

assessment purposes, we calculated 

exporter/importer- (or customer) 

-specific assessment rates for 

merchandise subject to this review. 

Where appropriate, we calculated an ad 

valorem rate for each importer (or 

customer) by dividing the total dumping 

margins for reviewed sales to that party 

by the total entered values associated 

with those transactions. For dutyassessment rates calculated on this 

basis, we will direct CBP to assess the 

resulting ad valorem rate against the 

entered customs values for the subject 

merchandise. Where an importer- (or 

customer) -specific assessment rate is de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), the 

Department will instruct CBP to assess 

that importer’s (or customer’s) entries of 

subject merchandise without regard to 

antidumping duties. We intend to 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries 

containing subject merchandise 

exported by the PRC-wide entity at the 

PRC-wide rate determined in these final 

results. The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of the final results of this review. 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rates shown for those 

companies; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 216.01 percent; and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed in these final results within 

five days of the date of public 

announcement of the final results to 

parties in this proceeding in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). We are issuing 

and publishing these final results and 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: August 5, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix 

Comment 1: Unreported Sales 

Comment 2: Electricity 

Comment 3: Warranty Expenses 

Comment 4: Freight Revenue 

Comment 5: The Appropriate Methodology 

for Valuing Cardboard Cartons 

Comment 6: Brokerage and Handling 

Comment 7: The Appropriate SV for Plywood 

Comment 8: The Appropriate SV for Tape 

Comment 9: The Appropriate SV for Poly 

Foam 

Comment 10: The Appropriate SV for the 

Glue Used in Furniture Production 

Comment 11: Error in the Draft Rescission 

Instructions 

Comment 12: Calculation Error 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 155 / Thursday, August 11, 2011 / Notices 49735 

Comment 13: The Appropriate Conversion 

Factor for Oak Veneer 

Comment 14: Whether the Department 

Should Rescind its Administrative Review 

of Nantong Yangzi Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Comment 15: Whether Great Reputation, 

Cambridge and Glory Are Entitled to a 

Separate Rate 

Comment 16: Combination Rates 

Comment 17: Duty Absorption 

Comment 18: The Appropriate SV for Labor 

Comment 19: Financial Ratios 

Comment 20: Whether to use Huafeng’s ME 

Purchases to Value Certain Inputs 

Comment 21: Truck Freight 

Comment 22: Whether the Department 

Should Rescind its Administrative Review 

of Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration Co., 

Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20434 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–938] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Partial Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: August 11, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Jordan or Sergio Balbontin at 

(202) 482–1540 or (202) 482–6478; AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

Background 

On May 2, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published a notice announcing the 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the countervailing duty order 

on citric acid and certain citrate salts 

(‘‘citric acid’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 24460 

(May 2, 2011). On May 31, 2011, 

Huangshi Xinghua Biochemical Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Xinghua’’), a producer and 

exporter of citric acid, timely requested 

that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on citric acid, 

covering merchandise exported by 

Xinghua during the period of January 1, 

2010, through December 31, 2010. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department 

published a notice initiating this 

administrative review with regard to 

Xinghua. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 76 FR 37781 (June 28, 2011). 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(l), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

that requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. On July 27, 2011, 

Xinghua withdrew its request for review 

of itself within the 90-day period. 

Therefore, in response to Xinghua’s 

timely withdrawal request, and as no 

other party requested a review of 

Xinghua, the Department is rescinding 

this administrative review with respect 

to Xinghua. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries. For Xinghua, the 

countervailing duties shall be assessed 

at rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated countervailing duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice of 

rescission of administrative review with 

respect to Xinghua. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice of rescission is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: August 4, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–20427 Filed 8–10–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XA631 

Endangered and Threatened Species; 

Take of Anadromous Fish 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of availability and 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

NMFS has received two Tribal Resource 

Management Plans (TRMPs), one from 

the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (SBT) and 

one from the Confederated Tribes of the 

Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), 

and two Fishery Management and 

Evaluation Plans (FMEPs) from the 

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 

(ODFW), for fishery management in the 

Snake River Basin in Northeast Oregon. 

The TRMPs are provided pursuant to 

the Tribal 4(d) Rule; the ODFW FMEPs 

are submitted for approval under Limit 

4 of the 4(d) Rule for Pacific salmon and 

steelhead. This document serves to 

notify the public of the availability for 

comment of the proposed evaluation of 

the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) 

as to how the TRMPs address the 

criteria in the ESA, and the availability 

of the state FMEPs for public comment. 

NMFS also announces the availability of 

a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) 

for the pending determinations. 

DATES: Comments and other 

submissions must be received at the 

appropriate address or fax number (see 

ADDRESSES) no later than 5 p.m. Pacific 

time on September 12, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Written responses to the 

application should be sent to Enrique 

Patin ̃ o, National Marine Fisheries 

Services, Salmon Management Division, 

7600 Sand Point Way, NE., Seattle, WA 

98115. Comments may also be 

submitted by e-mail to: 

NEOregonFisheryPlans.nwr@noaa.gov. 

Include in the subject line of the e-mail 

comment the following identifier: 

Comments on Northeast Oregon Fishery 

Plans. Comments may also be sent via 

facsimile (fax) to (206) 526–6736. 

Requests for copies of the permit 

applications should be directed to the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES