alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/30/2010 11:07 AM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ

Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA |

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|07/29/2010 11:03 PM

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|docket number for Thunder Creek test

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

Cortney,

During our call today you asked for the docket number for the Thunder Creek

Compressor Station test. It is EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0059-0590. Turns out I was

mistaken and it wasn't one of the ones that we received post-proposal. It is

a report that we already had in the docket from the 2004 NESHAP, which we did

incorporate into the record for this rule.

I don't know why it wasn't used when we calculated the MACT floor at proposal.

I joined the project when work was already ongoing on the proposal, and as far

back as my records go, it wasn't used in the analysis for the proposal.

Melanie King

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency

Mail Code D243-01

RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-2469

Fax: (919) 541-5450

king.melanie@epa.gov
EX-10.40




 Exhibit 10.40 
  

					
			



		  
 Houston Technology Center

Suite 325
 410 Pierce
Street
 Houston, TX 77002

			 Phone: 832-431-3555

Fax: 858-756-0482
		

 March 31, 2015 
 Max W. Talbott,
PhD 
 Max Talbott LLC 
  

	Re:	First Amendment to Consulting Letter dated April 2, 2014 (the “Consulting Letter”) 

 Dear Dr.
Talbott: 
 Both you and MultiVir Inc. (the “Company”) acknowledge that a Trigger Event as defined in the Consulting
Letter has not been completed as of March 31, 2015. In that regard, both you and the Company agree that the second full paragraph of page 2 of the Consulting Letter shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows: 
 If the Company does not complete a Trigger Event on or before June 30, 2015, this Agreement shall terminate on June 30,
2015; provided, however, that this agreement shall continue after June 30, 2015 unless terminated upon 30-days prior written notice by either party. 

Except as expressly amended hereby the terms and conditions of the Consulting Letter shall remain in full force and effect. Kindly
countersign a copy of this letter and return it to me to evidence your acceptance of this amendment. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MultiVir, Inc.
		
	By:		  /s/ Nicholas Puro

	Name:		Nicholas Puro
	Title:		President and COO


  

	
	Agreed and Consented to:
	
	  /s/ Max W. Talbott, PhD

	Print Name: Max W. Talbott, PhD
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Marine Petroleum Trust (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

/s/ R. RAY BELL
----------------------------
R. Ray Bell
Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: September 26, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Marine Petroleum Trust and will be retained by Marine Petroleum
Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
SUBJECT: Forest Road Stormwater Discharges 

FROM: Prasad Chumble

Rural Branch

Water Permits Division, 4203M

TO: The File

DATE: 5/26/16

EPA met with the Western Governors' Association on 3/22/16, to discuss the potential of the regulation 

of stormwater discharges from forest roads under section 402(p)(6) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Report of Independent Public Accountants

To ADC Telecommunications, Inc.:

We
have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in this Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon dated November 22, 2000. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken as a whole.
Schedule II is the responsibility of the company's management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of the basic
financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the
financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLPArthur Andersen LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota,
November 22, 2000

1

---

ADC Telecommunications Inc. and Subsidiaries        Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts

|                                                                                       |  | Balance at Beginning
of Year |  | Charged to Costs
and Expenses |  | Deductions |  | Balance at End
of Year
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------------------
|Year 2000                                                                              |  |                              |  |                               |  |            |  |                       
|Reserves related to business restructuring, including force and facility consolidation |  | 9.0                          |  | 13.3                          |  | 7.9        |  | 14.4                  
|Year 1999                                                                              |  |                              |  |                               |  |            |  |                       
|Reserves related to business restructuring, including force and facility consolidation |  |                             |  | 39.0                          |  | 30.0       |  | 9.0                   
|Year 1998                                                                              |  |                              |  |                               |  |            |  |                       
|Reserves related to business restructuring, including force and facility consolidation |  |                             |  |                              |  |           |  |                      

2

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   654
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,815
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           220
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,197)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.001)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0677

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

GILBERT CAMPA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 28 2023

09/28/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0677
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Boyds Collection, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jean-Andre Rougeot, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

2)             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Jean-Andre Rougeot |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jean-Andre Rougeot      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 14, 2003            |   |
|                         |        |  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Company's Finacial
Statements as of December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000061004
<NAME>                        Lynch Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (361)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,674
<PP&E>                                          66,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (22,137)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,460
<BONDS>                                        116,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,192
<SALES>                                        194,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,222
<CGS>                                          172,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,544)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (8,065)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    303
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.12)



</TABLE>
§ 580.12 Decision and Order of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The Administrative Law Judge shall render a decision on the issues referred by the Administrator.
( b ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall be limited to a determination of whether the respondent has committed a violation of section 12, a violation of section 3(m)(2)(B), or a repeated or willful violation of section 6 or section 7 of the Act, and the appropriateness of the penalty assessed by the Administrator. The Administrative Law Judge shall not render determinations on the legality of a regulatory provision or the constitutionality of a statutory provision.
( c ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall include a statement of findings and conclusions, with reasons and basis therefor, upon each material issue presented on the record. The decision shall also include an appropriate order which may affirm, deny, reverse, or modify, in whole or in part, the determination of the Administrator.
( d ) The Administrative Law Judge shall serve copies of the decision on each of the parties.
( e ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall constitute the final order of the Secretary unless, pursuant to § 580.13 of this part, there is an appeal to the Secretary.
[56 FR 24991, May 31, 1991, as amended at 86 FR 52987, Sept. 24, 2021]
# U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS 

# Walk-in Coolers and Walk-In Freezers Equipment
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independ ence Avenue, SW, Room # 1E-245 Washington, DC 20585 February 04, 2009

Purpose: The Department is holding this informal public meeting as a first step in the energy conservation standards rulemaking pr ocess for Walk-in Coolers and Walk-In Freezers. This meeting is intended to familiarize stakeholder s with the approach and analytical tools that DOE anticip ates using, and as such, it is the starting point for the rulemaking process. The meeting will highlig ht issues on which DOE requests feedback from interested parties on the assumptions, methodology, and analytical tools DOE
proposes to use.



## AGENDA

9:00 – 9:05 am Welcome

9:05 – 9:30 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, & Agenda Review ( Doug Brookman )

9:30 – 9:45 am Rulemaking Overview ( Charles Llenza )

9:45 – 10:00 am Test Procedure Development ( Rebecca Legett )

10:00 – 10:25 am Market & Technology Assessment & Screening Analysis ( Rebecca Legett )

10:25 – 10:45 am Engineering Analysis ( Aris Marantan )

10:45 – 11:00 am Break

11:00 – 11:30 am Markups for Equipment Price, Energy Use, & End-Use Load Characterization ( Marcus De La Rosa )

11:30 am – 12:15 pm Life-Cycle Cost & Payback Period Analyses ( Grant Williams )

12:15 – 1:15 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:15 – 1:45 pm Shipments Analysis & National Impact Analysis ( Grant Williams )

1:45 – 2:15 pm NOPR & LCC Subgroup Analyses ( Sriram Somasundaram & Grant

Williams )

2:15 – 2:30 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis ( Aris Marantan )

2:30 – 3:00 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment & Regulatory Impact Analysis ( Sriram

Somasundaram )

3:00 – 3:15 pm Break

3:15 – 4:30 pm Other Issues, Questions & Comments / Closing Remarks

4:30 pm Adjourn
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE - SFAS NO 128 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LUKENS INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                                     10,282
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             100,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                                7,750
<INVENTORY>                                               148,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          266,656
<PP&E>                                                    953,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                            420,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            888,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     167,498
<BONDS>                                                   248,695
<COMMON>                                                      158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      13,427
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                244,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              888,751
<SALES>                                                   970,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          970,320
<CGS>                                                     915,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             915,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           11,348
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         16,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (42,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (14,377)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (28,411)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (28,411)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (2.06)
        

</TABLE>
National Archives and Records Administration

Office of the Federal Register

2007

Ms. Nancy Molitor

Regulations Division (AGe-20G)

Office orthe Chief Counsel

Fede.ral Aviati01~ AoministratioH, DOT

800 Independence Avenue, SW

\Vashingtol1, DC 20591

Dcar Ms. Molitor:

The materIal hsted in the atiacrJ.mcnt!s approved for ll1coq)ucation by reference Jl1 14 CFR Pmt 39.

11lis approval is contingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by

our staffs. The approval to Incorporate by reference till,'; publication(s) is effective on the effective dale of your

final rule. Ifyat! wish to enforce some other edillOn of the pubhcation(s) approved. YOLI must:

I. Publish notice oftbe change in the Federal Register, and amend the

Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3 Notify me in \vriting of the change.

S1l1cerely,

4'U<~:2..~

f~

RAYMOND A. MOSLEY

Director of the Federal Register

Federal Register Attorney: (}VV

Attachment

US mil.Haddress: 8601 Adelphi Road, College PMk, MO 207·W-6001

Office location: 800 North Capitol Street, Nv\', Suite 700, Washington, DC 200()24244

Feder,,] R"gister web sites: http://wv,,'w.archives.gov/federal-register fwd bttp;J /www.gpmcct's5,gov!llill'a
/i/(;orpoI'l11ioll by Referellce

Dockef No. FAA-2006-24983, Directorate Idellhjler ]005-NM-1!J6-AD,' Amdl. 39-15068, AD 2007-1}·1 f

Airbus Service Bulleiin A320- Revision 2

32A 1273 including

Appendix 1

d3led May 26, 2005

Docket No. FAA-2007-:!7016: Direcrorate Identifier 20U6-NM-J76-AD. Ail/dt. 3!J-f5066; AD ]007-f j-()I)

Bonlbardier Service Bulieiin 84-26· Revision B

07

dated November 1, 2006

Bomb3rdier Service Bulletin A84-26- Revision A dated June 6, 2005

06

Docker No, I::'AA-l007-27338: Direclorate Identifier 2006-NM-148-AD: AIJ/dt. 39- f 5070: AD 2007- / f - f 3

Boeing 717-200 Airworthiness Revision 5

limitations Instructions

(All) Report No. MDC96K9063

dated February 2006

Docket No. FAA-2007-17509: DireclOmte Identifier lUU6-Nkl-201-AD: Amdt. 39-15067: AD 2007-J 1-/0

Fokker SelYice Bulletin sbf100-

32-142

dated August 12, 2005

PdllU!t! 5/2//UJ07 Prlgf' / of I
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00734-CV

Sandra SAKS, Lee Nick McFadin, III and Margaret Landen Saks,

Appellants

v.

BROADWAY COFFEEHOUSE, LLC,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-17001

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellants' motion for temporary staying enforcement of the judgment is hereby 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court