alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9/3/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2538

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2538

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Thursday, September 03, 2015 9:25 AM

To: info@flexiblevision.com

Dear Mr. Kazmierczak:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA­2015­2538).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/17/15. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­4264.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking
#### § 778.323 Effect if salary is for variable workweek.

The discussion in the prior section sets forth one result of reducing the workweek from 40 to 35 hours. It is not either the necessary result or the only possible result. As in all cases of employees hired on a salary basis, the regular rate depends in part on the agreement of the parties as to what the salary is intended to compensate. In reducing the customary workweek schedule to 35 hours the parties may agree to change the basis of the employment arrangement by providing that the salary which formerly covered a fixed workweek of 40 hours now covers a variable workweek up to 40 hours. If this is the new agreement, the employee receives $200 for workweeks of varying lengths, such as 35, 36, 38, or 40 hours. His rate thus varies from week to week, but in weeks of 40 hours or over, it is $5 per hour (since the agreement of the parties is that the salary covers up to 40 hours and no more) and his overtime rate, for hours in excess of 40, thus remains $7.50 per hour. Such a salary arrangement presumably contemplates that the salary will be paid in full for any workweek of 40 hours or less. The employee would thus be entitled to his full salary if he worked only 25 or 30 hours. No deductions for hours not worked in short workweeks would be made. (For a discussion of the effect of deductions on the regular rate, see §§ 778.304 to 778.307.)

[46 FR 7316, Jan. 23, 1981; 46 FR 33516, June 30, 1981]
###### Editorial Note on Part 6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

#### § 6.46 Ineligible list.

Upon the final decision of the Administrative Law Judge, Administrative Review Board, as appropriate, the Administrator promptly shall forward to the Comptroller General the names of any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which a person or firm debarred pursuant to section 5(a) of the Service Contract Act or § 5.12(a) of part 5 of this title has a substantial interest; and/or the name of any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which a person or firm debarred pursuant to section 3(a) of the Davis-Bacon Act has an interest.
#### § 780.132 Operations must be performed “by” a farmer.

“Farmer” includes the employees of a farmer. It does not include an employer merely because he employs a farmer or appoints a farmer as his agent to do the actual work. Thus, the stripping of tobacco, i.e., removing leaves from the stalk, by the employees of an independent warehouse is not a practice performed “by a farmer” even though the warehouse acts as agent for the tobacco farmer or employs the farmer in the stripping operations. One who merely performs services or supplies materials for farmers in return for compensation in money or farm products is not a “farmer.” Thus, a person who provides credit and management services to farmers cannot qualify as a “farmer” on that account. Neither can a repairman who repairs and services farm machinery qualify as a “farmer” on that basis. Where crops are grown under contract with a person who provides a market, contributes counsel and advice, make advances and otherwise assists the grower who actually produces the crop, it is the grower and not the person with whom he contracts who is the farmer with respect to that crop (*Mitchell* v. *Huntsville Nurseries,* 267 F. 2d 286).
#### § 778.415 The statutory provisions.

Sections 7(g) (1) and (2) of the Act provide:

(g) No employer shall be deemed to have violated subsection (a) by employing any employee for a workweek in excess of the maximum workweek applicable to such employee under such subsection if, pursuant to an agreement or understanding arrived at between the employer and the employee before performance of the work, the amount paid to the employee for the number of hours worked by him in such workweek in excess of the maximum workweek applicable to such employee under such subsection:

(1) In the case of an employee employed at piece rates, is computed at piece rates not less than one and one-half times the bona fide piece rates applicable to the same work when performed during nonovertime hours; or

(2) In the case of an employee performing two or more kinds of work for which different hourly or piece rates have been established, is computed at rates not less than one and one-half times such bona fide rates applicable to the same work when performed during nonovertime hours;

---

and if (i) the employee's average hourly earnings for the workweek exclusive of payments described in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (e) are not less than the minimum hourly rate required by applicable law, and (ii) extra overtime compensation is properly computed and paid on other forms of additional pay required to be included in computing the regular rate.
#### § 502.46 Retention of official record.

The official record of every completed administrative hearing provided by these regulations shall be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief Administrative Law Judge, or, where the case has been the subject of administrative review, the ARB.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: <RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com> Date: 7/22/2010 11:20 AM Subject: Re: ICR Extension Request Attachments: pic16653.gif

Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the Ebensburg Power Company (EPC) plant. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic16653.gif)

From: "Richard Ramsdell" <RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Gary Anderson" <ganderson@TRAINING.rtp.epa.gov>

Date: 07/08/2010 02:36 PM Subject: ICR Extension Request

Plant ID: 05183 Ms. Alicea, Ebensburg Power Company (EPC) recently received an Information Collection Request (ICR) that will be used to develop effluent limitation guidelines and standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry. EPC has started the process of compiling the information requested, but due to extensive amount of information requested, it will take some time to complete all the forms. EPC respectfully requests a 90 day extension for the submittal; of the data. If you should have any questions or comments please contact me via the contact information below.Thank you

Richard A. Ramsdell Plant Engineer Ebensburg Power Company PO Box 845 Ebensburg, PA 15931 Tel: (814) 472-1140 Ext. 305 Fax: (814) 472-1143 Email: RRamsdell@ebensburgpower.com
#### § 458.56 Service on respondent.

Upon the filing of a complaint, a copy of the complaint shall be served upon the respondent, and a written statement of such service shall be furnished to the District Director.

[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 31311, Aug. 1, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 15117, Mar. 31, 1994; 62 FR 6094, Feb. 10, 1997]
#### § 4043.5 How and where to file.

Reportable event notices required under this part must be filed electronically in accordance with the instructions posted on PBGC's Web site, *http://www.pbgc.gov*. Filing guidance is provided by the instructions and by subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter.
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip to main contentSkip to main navigationGet instructions for navigating this site Announcements A - Z Browse Search
 OAM HomeMaterialsActivity IdeasSocial MediaHistoryOAM History202320222021202020192018Earlier Years
 Go to ACL.gov
 Badges, Postcard & Other Artwork
 Web Ads/Badges
Download these **OAM images (.zip, 72KB)** to advertise the observance online.
OAM Theme ad   OAM Small Ad
OAM Leaderboard: Icon, theme, hashtag
OAM Leaderboard: Logo & Theme

Postcard
**Use a postcard (PDF, 5.4MB)** for mailings, invitations, or other promotions.
Connect, Create, Contribute Postcard

Button & Banner Artwork
Connect, Create, Contribute ArtThe **button artwork (PDF, 5.3MB)** is formatted for a 1.75” round lapel button and the **banner artwork (PDF, 5.7MB)** is formatted for a 3’x4’ sign or hanging banner. Both are scalable to any size without degradation.

OAM 2019 Home
OAM 2019 Materials
OAM 2019 Activity Ideas
OAM 2019 Resources

                    *Last modified on 06/04/2019* Infographic
**Get the OAM infographic (PDF, 5.7MB)**.
Connect, Create, Contribute infographic
 Back to Top    What We Do and Why We Do It
ACL was created around the fundamental principle that all people, regardless of age or disability, should be able to live independently and fully participate fully in their communities. Learn more about community living.

FacebookYouTubeTwitter x logo  XLinkedInShare on Other PlatformsSite Support
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Disclaimers
                      Contact Us
                      Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
                      Privacy Policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers & Players
                      Vulnerability Disclosure PolicyOther ACL Sites
  

        
      Disability Assistance and Information Line
                      Eldercare Locator
                      ElderJustice.acl.gov
                      LongTermCare.gov
                      OlderIndians.govRelated Sites
  

        
      Grants.gov
                      HHS.gov
                      No Fear Act
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      WhiteHouse.gov
                      Vote.gov**Sign up for ACL Updates**
Subscribe **
      *Advancing independence, integration, and inclusion throughout life*
        U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2057]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Medicare Payment Advisory Commission Nomination Letters

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Notice on letters of nomination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare 
Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General 
responsibility for appointing its members. For appointments to MedPAC 
that will be effective May 1, 2011, I am announcing the following: 
Letters of nomination should be submitted between February 1 and March 
7, 2011, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of 
nominees prior to the appointment of new members.

ADDRESSES: GAO: 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548. MedPAC: 601 
New Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9000, Washington, DC 20001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GAO: Office of Public Affairs, (202) 
512-4800.
    42 U.S.C. 1395b-6.

Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2011-2057 Filed 1-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
#### § 783.42 Vessels neither “documented” nor “numbered”.

An “American vessel” on which employment as a seaman is subject to the minimum wage under the provisions of section 6(b)(2) and section 13(a)(14) is not limited by the language of the Act to those vessels which are “documented” or “numbered” as described above in §§ 783.40 and 783.41. Since the term “American vessel” has traditionally been applied to regularly documented vessels (see *U.S.* v. *Rogers,* 27 Fed. Cas. 890; *Badger* v. *Entierrez,* 111 U.S. 734; 18 Op. A.G. 234 (1885); 48 Am. Jur. 40), the inclusion of numbered vessels in the statutory definition of “American vessel” would indicate that the work “includes” is used in the sense of “embracing”, as an enlargement and not as a word of limitation. The term may therefore apply to other vessels that do not fall within the illustrations given. For example, neither the documenting laws nor the numbering laws apply to vessels plying the purely internal waters of a State which do not join up with navigable waters touching on another State (19 CFR 3.5(a)(4); 33 CFR 2.10-5), but, nevertheless, the Fair Labor Standards Act does apply in those areas and it clearly would not comport with the remedial purpose of the Act to exclude from its minimum wage provisions seamen engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce in those areas though the vessels are not documented or numbered. On the contrary, the legislative history shows the affirmative purpose to improve, though to a limited extent, the status of seamen (Sen. Rep. No. 145, 87th Cong., 1st sess., p. 32, 50).
(78 South. 316)

#### JAMES v. STATE.

(6 Div. 368.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 26, 1918.)

1. Criminal Law &wkey;296 — Trial—Disposition op Pleas — Waiver op Irregularity.

While the issue on the plea of former jeopardy should properly be determined before other proceedings, yet defendant in a misdemeanor case interposing that plea and one of guilty,? and going to trial on both at the same time, without objection, waives the irregularity.

2. Indictment and Information <&wkey;81(l) — Plea op Misnomer.

Plea of misnomer will not lie, where the charging affidavit states defendant’s name is otherwise unknown.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; J. C. B. Gwin, Judge.

Lee Anna James was convicted, by the-judge without a jury, of the offense of violating the prohibition law, and from the-

judgment she appeals. Affirmed.

G. P. Benton, of Bessemer, for appellant. P. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and Ben G. Perry, of Bessemer, for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

[1] The defendant filed' her plea of former jeopardy, and contends that the issue on this plea should have been determined by the court before other proceedings were had. This is the proper practice, but where the defendant interposes both the plea of former jeopardy and not guilty in case of misdemeanor, and goes to trial' on both at the same time, as was done in this-case, without objection, he waives the irregularity. Dominick v. State, 40 Ala. 680, 91 Am. Dec. 496.

[2] After filing the plea of former jeopardy, the defendant filed a plea of misnomer,, alleging that her true name was Lee Anna James and not Leona Gray, as alleged in the indictment, The affidavit charged Lee Anna *401James, whose name is otherwise unknown. The plea was demurred to and the demurrer sustained. In this ruling the court was not in error. Oliveri v. State, 13 Ala. App. 348, 69 South. 359, and authorities there cited.

The questions of the plea of former jeopardy and of the guilt of the defendant vel non were questions of fact for the trial judge, upon the evidence, which was in conflict, and -we are not willing to say that the court erred in its findings.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
# AGENCY:

 Advisory Committee on Women in the Services, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 Pursuant to Section 10(a), Public Law 92-463, as amended, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming Quarterly Executive Committee Meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS). The purpose of the Executive Committee Meeting is to review the responses to the recommendations and request for information adopted by the committee at the DACOWITS 2000 Fall Conference.

# DATES:

 February 7, 2000, 9:15 a.m.-4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

 SECDEF Conference Room 3E869, The Pentagon, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Major Susan E. Kolb, ARNGUS, DACOWITS and Military Women Matters, OASD (Force Management Policy), 4000 Defense Pentagon, Room 3D769, Washington, DC 20301-4000; telephone (703) 697-2122.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 Meeting agenda:

## Monday February 7, 2000

### Time and Event

9:15-9:29 a.m.—Introductions (3E869—SecDef Conf Rm) (Open to Public)

9:30-10:29 a.m.—Pay and Compensation Briefing (Open to Public)

10:30-11:29 a.m.—TRICARE Follow up Briefing (QOL, RFI #1) (Open to Public)

11:30-2:14 p.m.—Lunch for Executive Committee Members, Military Staff (By invitation only)

2:15-2:59 p.m.—Child Care Briefing (QOL RFI #2) (Open to Public)

3:00-3:29 p.m.—Future Issues (Open to Public)

3:30-3:59 p.m.—Review 2000 Mission, Vision and Goals Review Upcoming DACOWITS events Wrap up (Open to Public)

4 p.m.—DACOWITS members depart

Dated: January 13, 2000.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-1309 Filed 1-19-00; 8:45 a.m.]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### § 779.326 Sources of information.

In determining whether a sale or service is recognized as a retail sale or service in a particular industry, there are available to the Secretary a number of sources of information to aid him in arriving at a conclusion. These sources include: (a) The legislative history of the Act as originally enacted in 1938 and the legislative history of the 1949, 1961, and 1966 amendments to the Act pertaining to those sections in which the term “retail or service establishment” is found, particularly in the section 13(a)(2) exemption; (b) the decisions of the courts during the intervening years; and (c) the Secretary's experience in the intervening years in interpreting and administering the Act. These sources of information enable the Secretary to lay down certain standards and criteria, as discussed in this subpart, for determining generally and in some cases specifically what sales or services are recognized as retail sales or services in particular industries.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of LCNB Corp. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve P. Foster, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of LCNB Corp., certify, that:



(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LCNB Corp.;



(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4)

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





(1)

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and





b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







July 26, 2004

/s/ Steve P. Foster



Steve P. Foster, Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer





-34-