alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 283 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Postal Service 

should discontinue the practice of contracting out mail delivery services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2007 

Mr. CASEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States 

Postal Service should discontinue the practice of contracting out mail delivery services. 

Whereas letter carriers of the United States Postal Service 

provide mail delivery service to over 144,000,000 homes 

and businesses across the Nation; 

Whereas the contracting out of mail delivery services is being 

increasingly promoted by the Postal Service as a key 

business strategy for its core function; 

Whereas by contracting out letter carrier positions, the Postal 

Service is bypassing the hiring process that ensures that 

only qualified people handle America’s mail; 

Whereas the contracting out of mail delivery services limits 

the ability of the Postal Service to prevent, investigate, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 283 IS 

and prosecute mail theft, mail fraud, and other illegal 

uses of the mail; and 

Whereas the protection of our mail delivery services is a vital 

component of our national security: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the 

2 United States Postal Service should discontinue the prac3 tice of contracting out mail delivery services. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 580.13 Procedures for appeals to the Administrative Review Board. ( a ) Any party desiring review of a decision of the Administrative Law Judge, including judicial review, must file a petition for review with the Department's Administrative Review Board (Board). To be effective, such petition must be received by the Board within 30 days of the date of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge. Copies of the appeal shall be served on all parties and on the Chief Administrative Law Judge. If such a petition for review is timely filed, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall be inoperative unless and until the Board dismisses the appeal or issues a decision affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge.
( b ) All documents submitted to the Board shall be filed with the Administrative Review Board in accordance with 29 CFR part 26.
( c ) Documents are not deemed filed with the Board until actually received by the Board, either on or before the due date. No additional time shall be added where service of a document requiring action within a prescribed time was made by mail.
( d ) A copy of each document filed with the Board shall be served upon all other parties involved in the proceeding in accordance with 29 CFR part 26. Service by mail is deemed effected at the time of mailing to the last known address of the party.
[69 FR 75405, Dec. 16, 2004, as amended at 86 FR 1787, Jan. 11, 2021]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-126-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit
32.2
  
 
 Section
906 Certification
 -------------------------
 
 The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q of
the MLM Index TM Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350).
 
 The
undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the MLM Index TM Fund.
 
 
 November
10, 2009
 
 By: /s/
James A. Mehling
 -------------------------------------------
 Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Mount
Lucas Management Corporation,
 the
manager of the MLM Index TM Fund
§ 516.30 Learners, apprentices, messengers, students, or handicapped workers employed under special certificates as provided in section 14 of the Act. ( a ) With respect to persons employed as learners, apprentices, messengers or full-time students employed outside of their school hours in any retail or service establishment in agriculture, or in institutions of higher education, or handicapped workers employed at special minimum hourly rates under Special Certificates pursuant to section 14 of the Act, employers shall maintain and preserve records containing the same information and data required with respect to other employees employed in the same occupations.
( b ) In addition, each employer shall segregate on the payroll or pay records the names and required information and data with respect to those learners, apprentices, messengers, handicapped workers and students, employed under Special Certificates. A symbol or letter may be placed before each such name on the payroll or pay records indicating that that person is a “learner,” “apprentice,” “messenger,” “student,” or “handicapped worker,” employed under a Special Certificate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twin Faces East EntertainmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Smolanoff, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> -  The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.
 

 

                                                                                                           /S/Michael Smolanoff

                                                                                                           Michael Smolanoff

                                                                                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                                                                                           November 6, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12653 and #12654]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 4.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-1981-DR), dated 06/24/2011.

*Incident:*                         Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/14/2011 through 07/20/2011.                    

*Effective Date:*                         08/04/2011.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/23/2011.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/21/2012.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of  North Dakota, dated 06/24/2011 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:  

*Primary Counties:*                     Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Benson.                

*Contiguous Counties:*                     (Economic Injury Loans Only): North Dakota: Eddy, Wells.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P Loddo,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2011-20651 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 58 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 58

  Welcoming First Minister Dr. Ian Paisley and Deputy First Minister 
      Martin McGuinness of Northern Ireland to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2007

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Reed, Mr. Kerry, 
   Mr. Biden, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
 Obama, Mr. Smith, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Leahy) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Welcoming First Minister Dr. Ian Paisley and Deputy First Minister 
      Martin McGuinness of Northern Ireland to the United States.

Whereas, on May 8, 2007, power was restored to the Assembly of Northern Ireland, 
        opening a new chapter in the history of Northern Ireland;
Whereas Dr. Ian Paisley became First Minister and Martin McGuinness became 
        Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland;
Whereas Dr. Paisley and Mr. McGuinness have been working to solidify the peace 
        agreement and to govern Northern Ireland effectively; and
Whereas Dr. Paisley and Mr. McGuinness are making their first trip together to 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) welcomes First Minister Dr. Ian Paisley and Deputy 
        First Minister Martin McGuinness of Northern Ireland to the 
        United States;
            (2) commends Dr. Paisley and Mr. McGuinness for showing the 
        world that it is possible to rise above decades of bitter 
        sectarian violence to achieve peace; and
            (3) expresses hope that Northern Ireland will continue to 
        be peaceful and stable in the future.
                                 <all>
```
§ 552.6 Companionship services. ( a ) As used in section 13(a)(15) of the Act, the term *companionship services* means the provision of fellowship and protection for an elderly person or person with an illness, injury, or disability who requires assistance in caring for himself or herself. The provision of *fellowship* means to engage the person in social, physical, and mental activities, such as conversation, reading, games, crafts, or accompanying the person on walks, on errands, to appointments, or to social events. The provision of *protection* means to be present with the person in his or her home or to accompany the person when outside of the home to monitor the person's safety and well-being.
( b ) The term *companionship services* also includes the provision of care if the care is provided attendant to and in conjunction with the provision of fellowship and protection and if it does not exceed 20 percent of the total hours worked per person and per workweek. The provision of *care* means to assist the person with activities of daily living (such as dressing, grooming, feeding, bathing, toileting, and transferring) and instrumental activities of daily living, which are tasks that enable a person to live independently at home (such as meal preparation, driving, light housework, managing finances, assistance with the physical taking of medications, and arranging medical care).
( c ) The term *companionship services* does not include domestic services performed primarily for the benefit of other members of the household.
( d ) The term *companionship services* does not include the performance of medically related services provided for the person. The determination of whether services are medically related is based on whether the services typically require and are performed by trained personnel, such as registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, or certified nursing assistants; the determination is not based on the actual training or occupational title of the individual performing the services.
[78 FR 60557, Oct. 1, 2013]
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Charles P. CooleyCharles P. CooleyChief Financial OfficerFebruary 27, 2009
797 A.2d 895

#### In the Matter of Carolyn Marie SINGLETON. Petition for Reinstatement from Inactive Status.

No. 153 DB 2001.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 21, 2002.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2002, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated April 26, 2002, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that CAROLYN MARIE SINGLETON, who has. been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 1999 (Unaudited) and the
Statement of Income for the period from inception on August 27, 1998
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         110,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,842
<PP&E>                                          15,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,511
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       213,483
<OTHER-SE>                                   (113,915)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,079
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (67,132)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (67,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (67,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 780.138 Application of the general principles.

Some examples will serve to illustrate the above principles. Employees of a fruit grower who dry or pack fruit not grown by their employer are not within section (f). This is also true of storage operations conducted by a farmer in connection with products grown by someone other than the farmer. Employees of a grower-operator of a sugarcane mill who transport cane from fields to the mill are not within section 3(f), where such cane is grown by independent farmers on their land as well as by the mill operator (*Bowie* v. *Gonzalez,* 117 F. 2d 11). Employees of a tobacco grower who strip tobacco (*i.e.*, remove the leaves from the stalk) are not agricultural employees when performing this operation on tobacco not grown by their employer. On the other hand, where a farmer rents some space in a warehouse or packinghouse located off the farm and the farmer's own employees there engage in handling or packing only his own products for market, such operations by the farmers are within section 3(f) if performed as an incident to or in conjunction with his farming operations. Such arrangements are distinguished from those where the employees are not actually employed by the farmer. The fact that a packing shed is conducted by a family partnership, packing products exclusively grown on lands owned and operated by individuals constituting the partnership, does not alter the status of the packing activity. Thus, if in a particular case an individual farmer is engaged in agriculture, a family partnership which performs the same operations would also be engaged in agriculture. (*Dofflemeyer* v. *NLRB,* 206 F. 2d 813.) However, an incorporated association of farmers that does not itself engage in farming operations is not engaged in agriculture though it processes at its packing shed produce grown exclusively by the farmer members of the association. (*Goldberg* v. *Crowley Ridge and Fruit Growers Association,* 295 F. 2d 7 (C.A. 8).)
| 1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Kathleen M. Jepson         |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                           |   |   |   |   |
| May 12, 2011                   |   |   |   |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 15 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.15
                                         Agreed to March 6, 2007        

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on March 29, 
2007, for a ceremony to award a Congressional Gold Medal collectively 
to the Tuskegee Airmen in accordance with Public Law 109-213. Physical 
preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with 
such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### § 780.802 What determines application of the exemption.

It is apparent from the language of section 13(b)(15) that the application of this exemption depends upon the nature and purpose of the work performed by the individual employee for whom exemption is sought, and in the case of ginning of cotton on the location of the place of employment where the work is done and other factors as well. It does not depend upon the character of the business of the employer. A determination of whether an employee is exempt therefore requires an examination of that employee's duties. Some employees of the employer may be exempt while others may not.