alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 794.139 Exempt and nonexempt activities in the workweek.

The general nature of the activities of a wholesale or bulk petroleum distribution enterprise in which an employee must be engaged in order to come within the intent of the section 7(b)(3) exemption is discussed in §§ 794.136 through 794.137. In each case where an employee of the enterprise is engaged for a substantial portion of his workweek in activities which do not appear to be a part of the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products, it will be necessary to examine such activities and the manner and extent of their performance to determine whether they are included in or are foreign to the activities customarily performed as an incident to or in conjunction with such distribution in the enterprises of the industry which distributes such products. If they are foreign to the activities thus customarily performed, engagement in them by the employee for a substantial portion of his workweek will render section 7(b)(3) inapplicable to him for that workweek. On the other hand, where an employee, who is otherwise engaged in the exempt activities (the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products, including activities which are a necessary part thereof, and in activities customarily performed in the enterprises of the industry as an incident thereto or in conjunction therewith), devotes an insubstantial amount of time (for administrative purposes, not more than 20 percent in a workweek) to these foreign activities, the section 7(b)(3) exemption will not for that reason be considered inapplicable to him.
#### In the Matter of Angel Gonzalez, Respondent, v Phylis S. Bamberger, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Submitted May 28, 1996;

decided July 2, 1996

On the Court’s own motion, appeal brought by District Attorney Johnson dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal by Justice Bamberger denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANTS

Louisville Gas and Electric Company (a Kentucky corporation), LG&E Capital Corp.
(a Kentucky corporation), LG&E Power Inc. (a Delaware corporation), LG&E Power
Operations Inc. (a California corporation), LG&E Energy Marketing Inc. (an
Oklahoma corporation), and LG&E International Inc. (a Delaware corporation) are
significant subsidiaries of LG&E Energy Corp.  Louisville Gas and Electric
Company and LG&E Capital Corp. are wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of LG&E
Energy Corp.  LG&E Power Inc. and LG&E International Inc. are wholly-owned
direct subsidiaries of LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E Energy Marketing Inc. and
LG&E Power Operations are wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of LG&E Power Inc.

LG&E Energy Marketing Inc., together with one subsidiary operating in the United
States, markets and brokers electric power and natural gas in the United States.
LG&E Power Operations, together with approximately 18 subsidiaries operating in
the United States, operates and maintains domestic power generation facilities.
Approximately twenty-seven other subsidiaries of LG&E Power Inc. (26 operating
in the United States and one operating in Canada) together are involved in the
gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the United
States and the marketing of natural gas in Canada.  LG&E International Inc.,
together with nine subsidiaries operating in the United States, three operating
in Argentina and two in Spain, holds LG&E Energy Corp.'s investments in the
Argentine gas distribution companies and its current and former investments in
foreign power generation facilities.

Louisville Gas and Electric Company has no subsidiaries.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,223
<PP&E>                                           5,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                      64
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,126
<SALES>                                            411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   839
<CGS>                                              174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       24
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
#### § 500.270 Retention of official record.

The official record of every completed administrative hearing provided by these regulations shall be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano,
Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 6, 2015 

# Order

January 6, 2015

150309 ( 11 8 )

JOSEPH WHITE

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

DETROIT EAST COMMUNITY MENTAL
HEALTH

, M. SNOWDEN, SHIRLEY CALHOUN, D. STERRETT, and GATEWAY COMMUNITY
HEALTH PROVIDER

, Defendant s

- Appell ees

. SC: 150309
COA: 314990 Wayne CC: 11

- 011126

- CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time for filing his reply in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED in part

. The reply submitted on January 2, 2015, is accepted for filing

. On further order of the Chief Justice, the plaintiff

- appella nt’s request for a 60

- day delay to allow him to hire a new attorney and conduct additional discovery is DENIED.
|Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-118348, 333-106282, 333-101536, 333-69696,
333-45094, 333-83153, 333-58555, 333-29567, 333-02289, 033-60928, 033-58489, and 033-11718
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated April 28, 2005, relating to
managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, appearing in this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of 4Kids
Entertainment, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


New York, NYApril 28,
2005
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.2


 


 





HS 2 LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement


Dated as of April 30, 2012


 


FORM OF CERTIFICATE


 


THE MEMBERSHIP INTEREST
REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”)
OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS.  ACCORDINGLY, SUCH MEMBERSHIP INTEREST MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED
OF WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH ACT AND SUCH STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND THE COMPANY MAY REQUIRE AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY
TO IT THAT NO VIOLATION OF SUCH ACT AND SUCH STATE SECURITIES LAWS WILL RESULT FROM ANY PROPOSED SALE, TRANSFER, OR OTHER DISPOSITION
OF SUCH MEMBERSHIP INTEREST.


 


THIS CERTIFICATE EVIDENCES
A MEMBERSHIP INTEREST IN DHS 2 LLC (THE “COMPANY”) AND SHALL BE A SECURITY FOR THE PURPOSES
OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AS IN EFFECT IN THE STATE OF COLORADO . TRANSFER OR ENCUMBRANCE OF THE MEMBERSHIP
INTEREST REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE IS RESTRICTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF THE COMPANY,
A COPY OF WHICH MAY BE INSPECTED AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICE OF THE COMPANY, AND ALL THE PROVISIONS OF WHICH ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
IN THIS CERTIFICATE.


 


	No.  [2]	
        DHS 2 LLC

        a Limited Liability Company

        under the laws of the State of Colorado 

         

        Membership Interest Certificate
	 


 


This certifies that
Aurora Capital Inc. is the owner of 20 Membership Interest valued at One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) in DHS 2 LLC
(the “Company”) shown above, which Membership Interest is subject to the terms of the Limited Liability
Company Agreement of DHS 2 LLC, dated as of April 30, 2012, as the same may be amended, restated, modified or supplemented from
time to time in accordance with the terms thereof (the “Limited Liability Company Agreement”). This Membership
was paid with 200,000 common shares of GDT Tek, Inc., stock (attached), valued at $.50 per share, and represent 20 Membership
Interest


 


This Membership Interest
Certificate may be transferred by the lawful holders hereof only in accordance with the provisions of the Limited Liability Company
Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
said Company has caused this Membership Interest Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized Officer and accepted by its new
Member or this 24 day of May, 2012.


 


	DHS 2 LLC 	Aurora Capital Inc. 	 
	 	 	 
	By:     /s/ Bo Linton	By: /s/ Scott Allen Johnson	 
	Name: Bo Linton	Name: Scott Allen Johnson	 
	Title: President	Title: President
#### § 406.8 Maintenance and retention of records.

Every person required to file any report under this part shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data from which the documents filed with the Office of Labor-Management Standards may be verified, explained or clarified, and checked for accuracy and completeness, and shall include vouchers, worksheets, receipts and applicable resolutions, and shall keep such records available for examination for a period of not less than five years after the filing of the documents based on the information which they contain.
(75 South. 276)

(8 Div. 428.)

#### SIMS v. STATE.

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 10, 1917.)

1. Criminal Law <&wkey;3C9(5) — Evidence — Other Offenses.

In prosecution for larceny, it was error to admit testimony that defendant had been prosecuted in federal courts for making' liquor.

[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 822, 823.]

2. Witnesses <&wkey;344(4) — Impeachment.

The making' of liquor does not constitute bad character to such an extent that a man who is charged with making it cannot be believed.

[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. §§ 1129, 1125.]

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County ; W. I-Iaralson, Judge.

Joe Sims was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Wm. C. Rayburn, of Guntersville, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Harwell G. Davis, Asst. Atty- Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of grand larceny, and from the judgment he appeals.

[1] On the trial the state proved hy the witness Walls (transcript, p. 7), over the objection of the defendant, that the defendant had been prosecuted in the United States court for making liquor. Upon what possible theory the court permitted this evidence to go to the jury, we cannot conceive. The defendant was being tried for the larceny of an evaporator. There was no evidence to show he had ever used this evaporator for making liquor.

[2] The making of liquor does not constitute bad character to such an extent that a man who is charged with making it cannot be believed; and in this instance it is not even claimed that he was convicted. For this error the judgment of the court must be reversed, and the other questions reserved will not probably arise on another trial.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), We, Wayne Bassham, President and director and Todd Albiston, Secretary/Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *2/06/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Wayne Bassham***       |
|-----------|-------------|----------|----------|----------------------------|
| * *  | * *    | * * | * * | *Wayne Bassham***          |
| * *  | * *    | * * | * * | *President and Director*** |
| * *  | * *    | * * | * * | * *                   |
| *Date:*** | *2/14/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Todd Albiston***       |
| * *  | * *    | * * | * * | *Todd Albiston***          |
| * *  | * *    | * * | * * | *Secretary and Director*** |
132 STAT. 3648 PUBLIC LAW 115–255—OCT. 9, 2018 

Public Law 115–255 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study 

of Fort Ontario in the State of New York. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Ontario Study Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of the Interior. 

(2) STUDY AREA.—The term ‘‘study area’’ means Fort 

Ontario in Oswego, New York. 

SEC. 3. FORT ONTARIO SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a special resource 

study of the study area. 

(b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under subsection (a), 

the Secretary shall— 

(1) evaluate the national significance of the study area; 

(2) determine the suitability and feasibility of designating 

the study area as a unit of the National Park System; 

(3) consider other alternatives for preservation, protection, 

and interpretation of the study area by the Federal Government, State or local government entities, or private and nonprofit organizations; 

(4) consult with interested Federal agencies, State or local 

governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations, or 

any other interested individuals; and 

(5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 

development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

(c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under subsection (a) 

shall be conducted in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, 

United States Code. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which 

funds are first made available to carry out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report that 

describes— 

Cost estimates. 

Consultation. 

Determination. 

Evaluation. 

Fort Ontario 

Study Act. 

Oct. 9, 2018 

[H.R. 46] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–255—OCT. 9, 2018 132 STAT. 3649 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 46 (S. 55): 

SENATE REPORTS: Nos. 115–110 and 115–104, accompanying S. 55, (both from 

Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Jan. 30, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

Sept. 25, House concurred in Senate amendment. 

Æ 

(1) the results of the study; and 

(2) any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary. 

Approved October 9, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
| | 
| | 

| | Exhibit
21.1   Subsidiaires of the Company
| | ------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

| | 
| | 

| | 
| | 

| | SUBSIDIARIES
OF THE COMPANY *
| | -----------------------------

|Name of Subsidiary                      | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
of Organization
|--------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|4Kids Entertainment Licensing, Inc.     | New York                                     
|4Kids Productions, Inc.                 | New York                                     
|4Kids Ad Sales, Inc.                    | Delaware                                     
|The Summit Media Group, Inc.            | New York                                     
|4Kids Entertainment Music, Inc.         | Delaware                                     
|4Kids Entertainment Technology, Inc.    | Delaware                                     
|4Kids Entertainment Home Video, Inc.    | Delaware                                     
|World Martial Arts Productions, Inc.    | New York                                     
|Websites 4Kids, Inc.                    | Delaware                                     
|Leisure Concepts International, Inc.    | New York                                     
|4Kids Entertainment International, Ltd. | United Kingdom                               

| | *
100% Owned Subsidiary
| | -----------------------
### Ground-water conditions in the proposed waterfowl refuge area near Chapman, Nebraska

By: Charles Franklin KeechPhilip G. Rosene

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1779E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### John Prozeralik, Respondent, v Capital Cities Communications, Inc., Appellant.

Submitted February 20, 1996;

decided April 30, 1996

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and the appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved and upon the further ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION

1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Ted R. Sharp

DATE:  April 14, 2014

Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.