alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 402.5 Terminal reports. ( a ) Any labor organization required to file reports under the provisions of this part, which ceases to exist by virtue of dissolution or any other form of termination of its existence as a labor organization, or which loses its identity as a reporting labor organization through merger, consolidation or otherwise, shall file a report containing a detailed statement of the circumstances and effective date of such termination or loss of reporting identity, and if the latter, such report shall also state the name and mailing address of the labor organization into which it has been consolidated, merged, or otherwise absorbed. Such report shall be submitted on Form LM-2 in connection with the terminal financial report required by § 403.5 of this chapter and shall be signed by the president and treasurer, or corresponding principal officers, of the labor organization at the time of its termination or loss of reporting identity and, together with a copy thereof, shall be filed with the Office of Labor-Management Standards within 30 days of the effective date of such termination or loss of reporting identity, as the case may be.
( b ) Labor organizations which qualify to use Form LM-3, the Labor Organization Annual Report, pursuant to §§ 403.4 and 403.5 of this chapter may file the terminal report called for in this section on Form LM-3. This report must be signed by the president and treasurer, or corresponding principal officers, of the labor organization.
( c ) Labor organizations which qualify to use Form LM-4, the Labor Organization Annual Report, pursuant to §§ 403.4 and 403.5 of this chapter may file the terminal report called for in this section on Form LM-4. The report must be signed by the president and treasurer, or corresponding principal officers, of the labor organization.
[28 FR 14381, Dec. 27, 1963, as amended at 62 FR 6092, Feb. 10, 1997]
November 16, 2015

Attn: U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operation s West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: STEVEN LIGHTCAP REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91 .7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 3 and Blade 350 QX3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 11 2-95) Addendum- I would like to add the following UAS to m y exemption, DJI INSPIRE ONE, DJI S900, DJI S1000. To be included with my origina l UAS's DJI PHANTOM 3, and BLADE 350QX3. These UAS's will be used for Aerial Photography and Videography, Inspection and Patrolling, Agriculture Documenting, Wildlife and F orestry Monitoring, Surveying, Search and Rescue, Disaster and catastrophe events, Motion Picture Filming, Aerial Imaging/Mapping, Cinematography, Roof Inspections. All of the rules set by the FAA will be followed wi th extreme precaution to the safety of the public. All pre-flight checklist will be excute d. All UAS's will be used in accordance with the FAA rules and regulations. Thank you for y our time and please call me with any questions.

Steven Lightcap Jr - Operator 11532 Crescent Pines Blvd. Clermont, FL 34711 352-267-9132 stevelightcap@yahoo.com

1
§ 780.818 Employees not engaged in processing. Employees engaged in operations which are not an integral part of processing of the named commodities will not come within the exemption. The following activities are not considered exempt under section 13(b)(15): ( a ) Office and general clerical work.
( b ) Feeding and housing millhands and visitors (typically this is called the “boarding house”).
( c ) Hauling raw sugar or molasses away from the mill.
( d ) Any work outside the grinding season.
Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  We,  Wayne  Bassham,   President  and  director  and  Todd  Albiston,
Secretary/Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: 10/31/2005                        /s/Wayne Bassham
      ----------                         ---------------------------
                                         Wayne Bassham
                                         President and director


Dated: 10/31/2005                        /s/Todd Albiston
      ----------                         ---------------------------
                                         Todd Albiston
                                         Secretary/Treasurer and director
#### § 503.54 Submission of documents to the Administrative Review Board.

All documents submitted to the ARB will be filed with the Administrative Review Board, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room S-5220, Washington, DC 20210. An original and two copies of all documents must be filed. Documents are not deemed filed with the ARB until actually received by the ARB. All documents, including documents filed by mail, must be received by the ARB either on or before the due date. Copies of all documents filed with the ARB must be served upon all other parties involved in the proceeding.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20560

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO SANCHEZ; also known as Gustavo Sanchez Sanchez, also known as

Gabriel Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimenez, also known as Gabriez

Jimemez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-226-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gustavo Sanchez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20560

2

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
§ 775.0 General enforcement policy. ( a ) In order to clarify at this time the practices and policies which will guide the administration and enforcement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C. 201-219), and the Walsh-Healey Act as amended (49 Stat. 2036, 41 U.S.C. 35-45), as affected by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 84; 29 U.S.C. Sup. 251 *et seq.*), the following policy is announced effective June 30, 1947.
( b ) The investigation, inspection and enforcement activities of all officers and agencies of the Department of Labor as they relate to the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Walsh-Healey Act will be carried out on the basis that all employers in all industries whose activities are subject to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act or the Walsh-Healey Act are responsible for strict compliance with the provisions thereof and the regulations issued pursuant thereto.
( c ) Any statements, orders, or instructions inconsistent herewith are rescinded.
[12 FR 3915, June 17, 1947]
§ 778.110 Hourly rate employee. ( a ) *Earnings at hourly rate exclusively.* If the employee is employed solely on the basis of a single hourly rate, the hourly rate is the “regular rate.” For overtime hours of work the employee must be paid, in addition to the straight time hourly earnings, a sum determined by multiplying one-half the hourly rate by the number of hours worked in excess of 40 in the week. Thus a $12 hourly rate will bring, for an employee who works 46 hours, a total weekly wage of $588 (46 hours at $12 plus 6 at $6). In other words, the employee is entitled to be paid an amount equal to $12 an hour for 40 hours and $18 an hour for the 6 hours of overtime, or a total of $588.
( b ) *Hourly rate and bonus.* If the employee receives, in addition to the earnings computed at the $12 hourly rate, a production bonus of $46 for the week, the regular hourly rate of pay is $13 an hour (46 hours at $12 yields $552; the addition of the $46 bonus makes a total of $598; this total divided by 46 hours yields a regular rate of $13). The employee is then entitled to be paid a total wage of $637 for 46 hours (46 hours at $13 plus 6 hours at $6.50, or 40 hours at $13 plus 6 hours at $19.50).
[76 FR 18857, Apr. 5, 2011]
#### CROSBY v STATE

Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Lucas County

No 2378.

Decided May 5, 1930

Herbert J. Jacobson, Cincinnati, for Crosby.

Leroy W. Hunt, Prosecuting Attorney, Toledo, and Clarence A. Irwin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Toledo, for State.

WILLIAMS, J.

Plaintiff in error maintains that the court erred in submitting the charge of breaking and entering the building in the daytime. There was no count covering that offense in the indictment, and claim is made that it is not an included offense under the charge of burglary. Whether or not the trial court was in error in submitting the charge of breaking and entering in the daytime is of no consequence in the instant case, for such error, if committed, was not prejudicial as the sentence imposed was warranted by reason of the fact that the jury found Crosby guilty of grand larceny.

We have examined all the errors complained of and find none prejudicial to plaintiff in error. For the reasons given the judgment will be affirmed.

Lloyd and Richards, JJ., concur.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 184A/17 l

| | ISSN 1725-2466 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 184A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 47o anno17 luglio 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2466

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 184A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

47o anno17 luglio 2004

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Informazioni |
| | Consiglio |
| 2004/C 184A/1 | | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

III   Informazioni

Consiglio

2004/C 184A/1

1

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

III Informazioni

Consiglio

| 17.7.2004 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2004

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 184/1

---

AVVISO DI POSTO DISPONIBILE

(rif. A/014)

DIRETTORE GENERALE

(2004/C 184 A/01)

Il Segretariato generale del Consiglio dell'Unione europea intende coprire un posto di direttore generale in seno alla direzione generale H — Giustizia e affari interni.

Ulteriori informazioni (disponibili in lingua inglese e francese) e i formulari di candidatura possono essere ottenuti contattando il servizio di selezione e assunzione al seguente indirizzo elettronico: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int, oppure sul suo sito web al seguente indirizzo: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Termine: 3 settembre 2004, il timbro postale facente fede.

---
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 294/30 t

| | ISSN 1725-5198 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea | C 294 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 4730 ta' Novembru 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5198

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea

C 294

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 4730 ta' Novembru 2004

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Tagħrif |
| | Kummissjoni |
| 2004/C 294/1 | Il-kontijiet definittivi ta' kull sena tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej – Sena Finanzjarja 2003 – Kontijiet konsolidati (Consolidated statements) dwar l-implimentazzjoni tal-baġit u kontijiet finanzjarji konsolidati | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

I   Tagħrif

Kummissjoni

2004/C 294/1

Il-kontijiet definittivi ta' kull sena tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej – Sena Finanzjarja 2003 – Kontijiet konsolidati (Consolidated statements) dwar l-implimentazzjoni tal-baġit u kontijiet finanzjarji konsolidati

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Din il-Ħarġa Speċjali bil-Malti hija ppubblikata bil-lingwi uffiċjali ta' l-istituzzjonijiet ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea fil-ĠU C 294. |

---

(1)   Din il-Ħarġa Speċjali bil-Malti hija ppubblikata bil-lingwi uffiċjali ta' l-istituzzjonijiet ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea fil-ĠU C 294.

1

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

I Tagħrif

Kummissjoni

| 30.11.2004 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2004

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea

C 294/1

---

Il-kontijiet definittivi ta' kull sena tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej – Sena Finanzjarja 2003 – Kontijiet konsolidati (Consolidated statements) dwar l-implimentazzjoni tal-baġit u kontijiet finanzjarji konsolidati

(2004/C 294/01)

Il-kontijiet definittivi ta' kull sena tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej – Sena Finanzjarja 2003 – Kontijiet konsolidati (Consolidated statements) dwar l-implimentazzjoni tal-baġit u kontijiet finanzjarji konsolidati – ma ġewx tradotti għal-[Latvjan, Litwan, Estonu, Pollakk, Ungeriż, Ċek, Slovakk, Sloven, Malti]. Iżda l-kontijiet oriġinali bl-Ingliż huma disponibbli f' forma elettronika fil-EUR-Lex, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOIndex.do?ihmlang=en <http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOIndex.do?ihmlang=en>, fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 294 tat-30 ta' Novembru 2004.

---
(75 South. 701)

#### McKISSACK v. STATE.

(6 Div. 292.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 1917.)

1. Criminal Law <§=>786(7) — Failure to Instruct on Material Issue.

Where material allegations in indictment for rape were proven only by testimony of the victim, it was error to refuse a charge based-on her willful and corrupt'swearing.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 1901, 1960, 1984.]

2. Criminal Law '<§=>775(2) — Failure to Instruct on Alibi.

It is error to refuse to charge that, if defendant was at another place at the time of the rape, he should be acquitted, where evidence was introduced tending tó establish an alibi.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 1833.]

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cullman County; R. C. Brickell, Judge.

Chester McKissack .was convicted of having carnal knowledge of a girl over the age of 12 and under the age of Í6, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Paine Denson and F. E. St. John, both of Cullman, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of having carnal knowledge of a girl over the age of 12 years and under the age of 16. The conviction was had under section 7700 of the Code of 1907, as amended by Acts 1915, p. 137. The principal witness for the state was the girl, Nettie Plott. In fact, the material allegations in the indictment were proven only by her testimony, and upon her testimony the state necessarily relied for a conviction.

[1] Refused charge 9, requested by the defendant in writing, should have been given. Prater v. State, 107 Ala. 26, 32, 18 South. 236; *110McClellan v. State, 117 Ala. 140, 23 South. 653; Grimes v. State, 63 Ala. 166; Childs v. State, 76 Ala. 93; A. G. S. R. R. Co. v. Frazier, 93 Ala. 45, 51, 9 South. 303, 30 Am. St. Rep. 28; Keef v. State, 7 Ala. App. 15, 60 South. 963; Jordan v. State, 81 Ala. 20, 31, 1 South. 577. This charge 9 is based on the willful and corrupt false swearing to material facts of the injured party, who was the principal witness in this case, and, as the principles of law involved in this charge .were not substantially covered by the oral charge of the court, nor by any of the written charges given to the jury, it follows that its refusal was error.

[2] Charges 2 and 3 should also have been given, as there was no conflict in the testimony of the time and place of the alleged offense, which from the evidence it was contended was committed on the night of October 18, 1915. If the defendant was at his hdme some three- miles distant and did not leave home that night, and was not at the home of Plott, it necessarily follows that he could not have committed the offense with which he was charged at that time. Burton v. State, 107 Ala. 108, 131, 18 South. 284. Other questions need not be discussed.

For the errors pointed out, the judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
#### § 453.24 Payment of bonding costs.

The Act does not prohibit payment of the cost of the bonds, required by section 502(a), by labor organizations or by trusts in which a labor organization is interested. The decision whether such costs are to be borne by the labor organization or trust or by the bonded person is left to the duly authorized discretion and agreement of the parties concerned in each case.
#### § 501.46 Retention of official record.

The official record of every completed administrative hearing provided by the regulations in this part shall be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief ALJ, or, where the case has been the subject of administrative review, the ARB.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Twan Burgess and Erica Burgess, Appellant s

No. 06

- 18

- 00080

- CV v.
Wintermute Enterprises, LLC; and Zachariah A. Wintermute, Agent, Appellee s Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Bell County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 86,846 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of t he court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant s , Twan Burgess and Erica Burgess, ha ve adequately indicated

their inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 3, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Monday, August 06, 2012 3:18 PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

FW: Rhinelander Wisconsin air service. 

From: Everett [mailto:elxn@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 2:02 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Rhinelander Wisconsin air service. 

... b 

Although small, the city of Rhinelander and the surrounding area deserve good air service. 

For over 55 years, air service was a great help for my business and personal travel, but that ended over a year ago. 

Good service must be restored at RHI. 

Sky West Airlines, with the Delta connection is obviously the best choice to provide this. 

Thank you,. 

Everett Ellingson, President, Ellingson Service Inc., Boulder Junction, Wisconsin 

1
#### § 501.7 Cooperation with Federal officials.

All persons must cooperate with any Federal officials assigned to perform an investigation, inspection, or law enforcement function pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1188 and this part during the performance of such duties. WHD will take such action as it deems appropriate, including initiating debarment proceedings, seeking an injunction to bar any failure to cooperate with an investigation, and/or assessing a civil money penalty therefor. In addition, WHD will report the matter to OFLC, and may recommend to OFLC that the person's existing temporary agricultural labor certification be revoked. In addition, Federal statutes prohibiting persons from interfering with a Federal officer in the course of official duties are found at 18 U.S.C. 111 and 114.
§ 2570.3 Service: Copies of documents and pleadings. For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.3 of this title. ( a ) *General.* Copies of all documents shall be served on all parties of record. All documents should clearly designate the docket number, if any, and short title of all matters. All documents shall be delivered or mailed to the Chief Docket Clerk, Office of Administrative Law Judges, 800 K Street, NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20001-8002, or to the OALJ regional Office to which the proceedings may have been transferred for hearing. Each document filed shall be clear and legible.
( b ) *By parties.* All motions, petitions, pleadings, briefs or other documents shall be filed with the Office of Administrative Law Judges with a copy including any attachments to all other parties of record. When a party is represented by an attorney, service shall be made upon the attorney. Service of any document upon any party may be made by personal delivery or by mailing a copy to the last known address. The Department shall be served by delivery to the Associate Solicitor, Plan Benefits Security Division, ERISA Section 502(i) Proceeding, P.O. Box 1914, Washington, DC 20013. The person serving the document shall certify to the manner and date of service.
( c ) *By the Office of Administrative Law Judges.* Service of orders, decisions and all other documents, except notices, shall be made by regular mail to the last known address.
( d ) *Service of notices.* ( 1 ) Service of notices shall be made either: ( i ) By delivering a copy to the individual, any partner, any officer of a corporation, or any attorney of record;
( ii ) By leaving a copy at the principal office, place of business, or residence of such individual, partner, officer or attorney; or
( iii ) By mailing a copy to the last known address of such individual, partner, officer or attorney.
( 2 ) If service is accomplished by certified mail, service is complete upon mailing. If done by regular mail, service is complete upon receipt by the addressee.
( e ) *Form of pleadings.* ( 1 ) Every pleading shall contain information indicating the name of the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) as the agency under which the proceeding is instituted, the title of the proceeding, the docket number (if any) assigned by the Office of Administrative Law Judges and a designation of the type of pleading or paper (e.g., notice, motion to dismiss, etc.). The pleading or paper shall be signed and shall contain the address and telephone number of the party or person representing the party. Although there are no formal specifications for documents, they should be typewritten when possible on standard size 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inch paper.
( 2 ) Illegible documents, whether handwritten, typewritten, photocopied, or otherwise, will not be accepted. Papers may be reproduced by any duplicating process provided all copies are clear and legible.
[53 FR 37476, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 65 FR 7191, Feb. 11, 2000; 68 FR 17508, Apr. 9, 2003]