alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.3

Certification

I, James L. Hambrick, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Lubrizol Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ James L. Hambrick                
|James L. Hambrick                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|April 28, 2011
§ 520.505 How will I be notified that my request to employ student-learners at subminimum wages has been denied and can I appeal the denial? ( a ) If, after review, an application is denied, notification of denial will be made to the appropriate school official, the employer and the student. This notification will occur within 30 days following the date such application was forwarded to the Wage and Hour Division, unless additional time for review is considered necessary or appropriate.
( b ) If additional time for review is considered necessary or appropriate, the proper school official, the employer, and the student shall be so notified. To the extent feasible, the Administrator may provide an opportunity to other interested persons to present data and views on the application before denying a special student-learner certificate.
( c ) Whenever a notification of denial is mailed to the employer, such denial shall be without prejudice to any subsequent application, except under the circumstances referred to in § 520.502(i)(3).
( d ) Section 520.204 of this part describes the procedures for requesting reconsideration of a decision to grant or deny a certificate.
§ 501.36 Caption of proceeding. ( a ) Each administrative proceeding instituted under 8 U.S.C. 1188 and the regulations in this part shall be captioned in the name of the person requesting such hearing, and shall be styled as follows: In the Matter of ___, Respondent.
( b ) For the purposes of such administrative proceedings, the WHD Administrator shall be identified as plaintiff and the person requesting such hearing shall be named as respondent.
§ 779.348 Goods must be made at the establishment which sells them. ( a ) Further to make certain that the exemption applies to retail establishments only and not to factories, an additional requirement of the exemption is that the goods which the exempt establishment makes or processes must be made or processed at the establishment which sells the goods. The exemption does not apply to an establishment which makes or processes goods for sale to customers who will go to other places to buy them. Thus an establishment that makes or processes any goods which the employer will sell from another establishment, is not exempt. If the establishment making the goods does not sell such goods but makes them for the purpose of selling them at other establishments the establishment making the goods is a factory and not a retail establishment.
( b ) Where the making or processing of the goods takes place away from the selling establishment, the section 13(a)(4) requirement that both the making or processing and selling take place at the same establishment cannot be met. This will be true even though the place at which the goods are made or processed services the retail selling establishment exclusively. In such a situation, while the selling establishment may qualify for exemption under section 13(a)(2), the separate establishment at which the goods are made or processed will not be exempt. The latter is a manufacturing establishment. For example, a candy kitchen manufacturing candy for sale at separate retail outlets is a manufacturing establishment and not a retail establishment. (*Fred Wolferman, Inc.* v. *Gustafson,* 169 F. 2d 759 (CA-8.))
( c ) The fact that goods made or processed on the premises of a bona fide retail establishment are sold by the establishment through outside salesmen (as, for example, department store salesmen taking orders from housewives for draperies) will not defeat the exemption if otherwise applicable. On the other hand, in the case of a factory or similar establishment devoted to making or processing goods, the fact that its goods are sold at retail by outside salesmen provides no ground for recognizing the establishment as a retail establishment or qualifying it for exemption.
§ 2570.69 Review by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary may review a decision of an administrative law judge. Such a review may occur only when a party files a notice of appeal from a decision of an administrative law judge within twenty (20) days of the issuance of such decision. In all other cases, the decision of the administrative law judge shall become final agency action within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704.
( b ) A notice of appeal to the Secretary shall state with specificity the issue(s) in the decision of the administrative law judge on which the party is seeking review. Such notice of appeal must be served on all parties of record.
( c ) Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the Secretary shall request the Chief Administrative Law Judge to submit to him or her a copy of the entire record before the administrative law judge.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2023]



[[Page 5391]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Pepper Centers.
    Date: February 17-18, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, 
MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, PhD, DSC, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 
2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e38e8291888c949082a38d8a82cd8d8a8bcd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="365b57445d5941455776585f5718585f5e18515940">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Clinical Trials.
    Date: February 28, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Rebecca J. Ferrell, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building Rm. 2C212, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7703, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e88e8d9a9a8d84849a82a885898184c6868180c68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9d9e89899e97978991bb969a9297d5959293d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-2023 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      557
<ALLOWANCES>                                        19
<INVENTORY>                                      1,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,651
<PP&E>                                           4,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              975
<BONDS>                                          1,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,101
<SALES>                                          4,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,120
<CGS>                                            3,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (12)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (212)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.15)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, Wayne Bassham, President and Director, and Todd Albiston, Secretary and Director, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *05/14/08*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Wayne Bassham***           |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|--------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Wayne Bassham***              |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *President and Director***     |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Bear Lake Recreation, Inc.*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                       |
| *Date:*** | *05/14/08*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Todd Albiston***           |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Todd Albiston***              |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Secretary and Director***     |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Bear Lake Recreation, Inc.*** |
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Compendium Statistics /
              - Employment /
              - 2.10 Change in Employment Gap - Civilians Ages 18-64 Years Living in the Community for the U.S.

## Table 2.10: Change in Employment Gap—Civilians Ages 18 to 64 Years Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2011 to 2012

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
Gormas. Michael (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Patti Handy <:at j j

Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:25 PM

Gormas, Michael (OST),

Patti Handy

Carrier for Kake

I> -:- (\_~}~~~CJ/-f'f(

r, \:_l ,_..:;,.:__~:~ ,i; ;~....•

I writing in support of Alaska Seaplanes. They have serviced our community well. They bought a

new plane that could accommodate us with passenqer and freight space.

The elders in our community have been very pleased with their planes and service. Easier to get in

and out. They fulfilled their promises. New plane, customer service and to fly IFR.

I am owner of the Waterfront Lodge (since 1961) I know how much it cost to invest in a business and

hope to make it work. I am also seating on a council in Kake.

I am in support of Alaska Seaplanes. They have safe planes.

Thank you for your time.

Patti Handy-owner Waterfront Lodge Kake

1
#### § 552.99 Basis for coverage of domestic service employees.

Congress in section 2(a) of the Act specifically found that the employment of persons in domestic service in households affects commerce. In the legislative history it was pointed out that employees in domestic service employment handle goods such as soaps, mops, detergents, and vacuum cleaners that have moved in or were produced for interstate commerce and also that they free members of the household to themselves to engage in activities in interstate commerce (S. Rep. 93-690, pp. 21-22). The Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare “took note of the expanded use of the interstate commerce clause by the Supreme Court in numerous recent cases (particularly *Katzenbach* v. *McClung,* 379 U.S. 294 (1964)),” and concluded “that coverage of domestic employees is a vital step in the direction of ensuring that all workers affecting interstate commerce are protected by the Fair Labor Standards Act” (S. Rep. 93-690, pp. 21-22).
Exhibit 99.1
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
First Capital Bank Holding Corporation (the "Company"), each certify that, to
his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:


               1.  The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending
                   March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
                   Commission on this date (the "Report") fully complies with
                   the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                   Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                   all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                   operations of the Company.



                                     /s/ Michael G. Sanchez
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Michael G. Sanchez
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    May 12, 2003

                                     /s/ Timothy S. Ayers
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Timothy S. Ayers
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    May 12, 2003




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Capital Bank Holding Corporation and will be retained by First
Capital Bank Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
" verv1ew 

11 2013 Civilian Overtime Performance 

0 Developing the 2014 Overtime Budget 

11 2013 Police Overtime Performance 

0 Developing the 2014 Overtime Budget 
Civilian Overtime Performance 

II 

• 

Excluding snow and Sandy Recovery, overtime usage wa

compared to 2012. 

Overtime usage exceeded plan (89,000 hours or 12% ove

due to: 

0 Unanticipated work associated with accelerated aeronau

construction projects 

0 Compliance with new FAA requirements for airport pave

markings and striping and accelerated maintenance req

on public safety vehicles 

0 Higher than planned staff coverage due to vacancies an
Improved civilian overtime budgeting --

Adjustments reflected in 2014 budget 

Adjusted to recognized current staff absence 

and turnover rates and set targets to improve 

productive time 

Identified variable work levels through rigorous 

analysis of historical data 

Provided new resources to support new work 
2014 budget provides management 

penormance measures 

Ill Managers are accountable to manage within overtime plan 

strategies to meet reduction targets 

1000 

u; 

-g 800 

"' en

::: 

0 

..c 

1- 600 

t: ~ ~ ::: 

0 400 

:c 

E "' ~ 200 

> 

0 

0 

20148 2014- 3Q Target 2014- 4Q Target 2015- Year End Target 

DCivlian Overtime mExtreme Weather 

• Strategies to support management in meeting plan 

D Integrated Absence Management Program 

D Adjust work schedules to allow for optimal straight time deployment 

D Overtime Executive Steering Committee oversight to review Departm

D Provide staffing resources when there is new, required and on-going 

Police Overtime Performance 

2013 Actual vs. 2013 Budget vs. 2012 Actual 

(/) 

"'C 

!: 

Ill 

(/) 

1,200 1,000 

:::l 800 

0 

..s::: 

1-

!: 

(/) 600 

.... 

:::l 

0 

:I: 

Q) 

E 400 

:e 

Q) 

> 

0 

200 

OTthru Q4 Total Police 

384K hours over budg

D Training 

D Higher than antici

perimeter patrols 

D Supervisor vacan

D Sick/100 D Applicant investig

recruit class 

D Security posts at 

PABT 
Improved 2014 police overtime budget 

designed to reflect operational realities 

Adjusted overtime assumptions to align with 

actual productivity of police 

Workload based on post assessments 

113th Police Class authorized to meet new and 

priority work at various commands including to 

WTC 
CSO 2014 Overtime Mitigation Strategie

• Commanding Officers are accountable to manage 

overtime plan 

• Department-coordinated effort to identify offsets fo

or new work 

111 Strategies to support management in meeting ove

D Enhance Absence Management to improve productivity 

• Provide resources to more quickly return sick staff to wo

increase productivity 

D Post-by-Post analysis to ensure only required work is complD Continued daily review of overtime performance by Comman

& bi-weekly meetings with CSO and Deputy CSO 

D Strategic deployment of new police officers and supervisors 

with new, required or on-going work
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2014-0625

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM044AD

605-24-007 --- 9/18/12

604-24-026 --- 9/18/12

601-0625 --- 9/18/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008