alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hours and Earnings in Tobacco Stemmeries

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Manning, Caroline, 1876-1966. 						*Hours and Earnings in Tobacco Stemmeries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 127*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1934,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5419,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Israella Mayeri, Respondent, v Harold Mayeri, Appellant.

Submitted April 15, 1996;

decided June 11, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which modified Supreme Court’s judgment of divorce and remitted the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine *914the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
#### § 4903.15 How will PBGC report debts owed to PBGC to credit bureaus?

PBGC will report delinquent debts owed to PBGC to credit bureaus in accordance with the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3711(e), 31 CFR 901.4, and the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-129, “Policies for Federal Credit Programs and Non-tax Receivables.” At least 60 days prior to reporting a delinquent debt to a consumer reporting agency, PBGC will send notice to the debtor in accordance with the requirements of § 4903.5 of this part. PBGC may authorize the Financial Management Service to report to credit bureaus those delinquent debts owed to the PBGC that have been transferred to the Financial Management Service under § 4903.10 of this part.
Fw: Transmittal of Supplemental NO2 Air Quality Impact Analysis

Julie Walters to: Amy Parsley 03/30/2011 01:39 PM

Cc: Shirley Rivera

Can you double check to make sure this email and its attachments are in the Avenal docket, and, if not, 

add them? I found this email in my FOIA search but didn't find notice the documents (or at least the 

attached letter) in the docket when I searched it earlier, though it's possible I may have just overlooked 

them somehow. 

Thanks!

Julie

**********************************************************

Julie Walters

Assistant Regional Counsel

USEPA, Region 9

75 Hawthorne St., Mail Code ORC-2 

San Francisco, CA 94105

Email: walters.julie@epa.gov

Direct Dial: 415-972-3892

Fax: 415-947-3570

***********************************************************

----- Forwarded by Julie Walters/R9/USEPA/US on 03/30/2011 01:37 PM -----

From: Shirley Rivera/R9/USEPA/US

To: Julie Walters/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Carol Bohnenkamp/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/14/2010 12:12 PM

Subject: Fw: Transmittal of Supplemental NO2 Air Quality Impact Analysis

Julie and Carol - here you go!

- Shirl

Week of May 10: In office through Thursday (05/10-05/13); in office Friday morning (05/14)

-------------------------------------------

Shirley F. Rivera 

T: (415) 972-3966 | F: (415) 947-3579 | Rivera.Shirley@epa.gov | Cube #17114

U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Permits Office (AIR-3) | 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105

----- Forwarded by Shirley Rivera/R9/USEPA/US on 05/14/2010 12:11 PM -----

From: "Eric Walther" <EWalther@sierraresearch.com>

To: Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Shirley Rivera/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Tyler 

Fox/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Roger Brode/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Jim Rexroad" <Jim.Rexroad@macquarie.com>, "Holmstead, Jeff" <Jeff.Holmstead@bgllp.com>, 

"Gary Rubenstein" <GRubenstein@sierraresearch.com>

Date: 05/14/2010 10:51 AM

Subject: Transmittal of Supplemental NO2 Air Quality Impact Analysis

On behalf of Avenal Power Center, LLC, please find the transmittal letter and the report 

“Supplemental NO2 Air Quality Impact Analysis” for the Avenal Energy Project.
Eric Walther

1801 J Street

Sacramento, CA 95811

916-444-6666 x121 Office indirect

916-273-5134 Office direct

916-833-8774 Cell

916-444-8373 Fax

916-419-3401 Home

 APC_NO2_TransmittalLetter.pdf APC_NO2_TransmittalLetter.pdf Hourly_NO2_Standard_Compliance.pdf Hourly_NO2_Standard_Compliance.pdf
§ 61.327 Are there specific endorsement requirements to operate a light-sport aircraft based on VH? ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, if you hold a sport pilot certificate and you seek to operate a light-sport aircraft that is an airplane with a VH less than or equal to 87 knots CAS you must— ( 1 ) Receive and log ground and flight training from an authorized instructor in an airplane that has a VH less than or equal to 87 knots CAS; and
( 2 ) Receive a logbook endorsement from the authorized instructor who provided the training specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section certifying that you are proficient in the operation of light-sport aircraft that is an airplane with a VH less than or equal to 87 knots CAS.
( b ) If you hold a sport pilot certificate and you seek to operate a light-sport aircraft that has a VH greater than 87 knots CAS you must— ( 1 ) Receive and log ground and flight training from an authorized instructor in an aircraft that has a VH greater than 87 knots CAS; and
( 2 ) Receive a logbook endorsement from the authorized instructor who provided the training specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section certifying that you are proficient in the operation of light-sport aircraft with a VH greater than 87 knots CAS.
( c ) The training and endorsements required by paragraph (a) of this section are not required if you have logged flight time as pilot in command of an airplane with a VH less than or equal to 87 knots CAS prior to April 2, 2010.
[Doc. No. FAA-2007-29015, 75 FR 5222, Feb. 1, 2010; Amdt. 61-125A, 75 FR 15610, Mar. 30, 2010]
#### Comvest Consulting, Inc., Respondent, v W.R.S.B. Development Company, L. L. C., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[698 NYS2d 199]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in *Comvest Consulting v W.R.S.B. Dev. Co.*(266 AD2d 890 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Vacate Order.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Scudder, Callahan and Balio, JJ. (Filed Nov. 12, 1999.)
798 A.2d 161

#### In re NOMINATION PETITION OF Marc J. GERGELY, Democratic Nomination for Representative in the General Assembly for the 35th Legislative District in the May 21, 2002 General Primary. Appeal of George A. Dillinger.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 3, 2002.

Robert Matthew Owsiany, Pittsburgh, for George A. Dillinger.

Angelo Anthony Papa, New Castle, Charles E. Schmidt, Harrisburg, for Marc J. Gergely.

Before ZAPPALA, C.J., CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s Motion to Strike Appellee’s Brief in Opposition to Jurisdictional Statement and Portions of the Brief of Appellee is DISMISSED as moot.
#### § 1975.2 Basis of authority.

The power of Congress to regulate employment conditions under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, is derived mainly from the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. (section 2(b), Pub. L. 91-596; U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 3; “United States v. Darby,” 312 U.S. 100.) The reach of the Commerce Clause extends beyond Federal regulation of the channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce so as to empower Congress to regulate conditions or activities which affect commerce even though the activity or condition may itself not be commerce and may be purely intrastate in character. (“Gibbons v. Ogden,” 9 Wheat. 1, 195; “United States v. Darby,” supra; “Wickard v. Filburn,” 317 U.S. 111, 117; and “Perez v. United States,” 91 S. Ct. 1357 (1971).) And it is not necessary to prove that any particular intrastate activity affects commerce, if the activity is included in a class of activities which Congress intended to regulate because the class affects commerce. (“Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States,” 379 U.S. 241; “Katzenbach v. McClung,” 379 U.S. 294; and “Perez v. United States,” supra.) Generally speaking, the class of activities which Congress may regulate under the commerce power may be as broad and as inclusive as Congress intends, since the commerce power is plenary and has no restrictions placed on it except specific constitutional prohibitions and those restrictions Congress, itself, places on it. (“United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.,” 315 U.S. 110; and “United States v. Darby,” supra.) Since there are no specific constitutional prohibitions involved, the issue is reduced to the question: How inclusive did Congress intend the class of activities to be under the Williams-Steiger Act?
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****U.S. government accomplishmentsin support of the Methane to Markets Partnership**
 
2006 | 2007
 
SuDoc Number: EP4.38:
Item Number:0483-E-50 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000936741
 
April 3, 2018
§ 570.50 General. ( a ) *Higher standards.* Nothing in this subpart shall authorize non-compliance with any Federal or State law, regulation, or municipal ordinance establishing a higher standard. If more than one standard within this subpart applies to a single activity the higher standard shall be applicable.
( b ) *Apprentices.* Some sections in this subpart contain an exemption for the employment of apprentices. Such an exemption shall apply only when: ( 1 ) The apprentice is employed in a craft recognized as an apprenticeable trade;
( 2 ) the work of the apprentice in the occupations declared particularly hazardous is incidental to his training;
( 3 ) such work is intermittent and for short periods of time and is under the direct and close supervision of a journeyman as a necessary part of such apprentice training; and
( 4 ) the apprentice is registered by the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training of the United States Department of Labor as employed in accordance with the standards established by that Bureau, or is registered by a State agency as employed in accordance with the standards of the State apprenticeship agency recognized by the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training, or is employed under a written apprenticeship agreement and conditions which are found by the Secretary of labor to conform substantially with such Federal or State standards.
( c ) *Student-learners.* Some sections in this subpart contain an exemption for the employment of student-learners. Such an exemption shall apply when: ( 1 ) The student-learner is enrolled in a course of study and training in a cooperative vocational training program under a recognized State or local educational authority or in a course of study in a substantially similar program conducted by a private school and;
( 2 ) Such student-learner is employed under a written agreement which provides: ( i ) That the work of the student-learner in the occupations declared particularly hazardous shall be incidental to his training;
( ii ) That such work shall be intermittent and for short periods of time, and under the direct and close supervision of a qualified and experienced person;
( iii ) That safety instructions shall be given by the school and correlated by the employer with on-the-job training; and
( iv ) That a schedule of organized and progressive work processes to be performed on the job shall have been prepared.
Each such written agreement shall contain the name of student-learner, and shall be signed by the employer and the school coordinator or principal. Copies of each agreement shall be kept on file by both the school and the employer. This exemption for the employment of student-learners may be revoked in any individual situation where it is found that reasonable precautions have not been observed for the safety of minors employed thereunder. A high school graduate may be employed in an occupation in which he has completed training as provided in this paragraph as a student-learner, even though he is not yet 18 years of age. [28 FR 3449, Apr. 9, 1963, as amended at 33 FR 12777, Sept. 10, 1968. Redesignated and amended at 36 FR 25156, Dec. 29, 1971]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Lancer
Orthodontics, Inc. annual 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         154,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,283,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,845,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,217,057
<PP&E>                                       2,276,491
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,004,151)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,950,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          800,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    185,242
<COMMON>                                     4,710,614
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,745,573)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,950,333
<SALES>                                      6,333,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,333,798
<CGS>                                        3,839,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,839,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                224,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            223,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   223,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
(81 South. 199)

#### UPSHAW v. STATE.

(3 Div. 334.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 14, 1919.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Milton Upshaw was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

W. R. Brassell and Brassell & Brassell, all of Montgomery, for appellant.

Emmett S. Thigpen, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of grand larceny. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and we find no error in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### § 778.216 The provisions of section 7(e)(2) of the Act.

Section 7(e)(2) of the Act provides that the term “regular rate” shall not be deemed to include “payments made for occasional periods when no work is performed due to vacation, holiday, illness, failure of the employer to provide sufficient work, or other similar cause; reasonable payments for traveling expenses, or other expenses, incurred by an employee in the furtherance of his employer's interests and properly reimbursable by the employer; and other similar payments to an employee which are not made as compensation for his hours of employment * * *.” However, since such payments are not made as compensation for the employee's hours worked in any workweek, no part of such payments can be credited toward overtime compensation due under the Act.
DAL 3.31.2015 EX 10.1




EXHIBIT 10.1


Second Amendment to the 
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan
Section 5(b) of the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance Compensation Plan 2007 Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 
		
	“(b)
	Share Counting.  Any Shares subject to an Award (but not including any Substitute Award), that expires, is cancelled, forfeited, or otherwise terminates without the delivery of Shares shall again be, or shall become, available for distribution under the Plan; provided, however, that (i) any Shares tendered in payment of an Option, (ii) Shares withheld by the Company to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to the exercise of an Option or SAR, or (iii) Shares covered by a stock-settled SAR or other Awards that were not issued upon the settlement of the Award, shall not again be available for distribution under the Plan.”





1
§ 4041.30 Requests for deadline extensions. ( a ) *In general.* The PBGC may in its discretion extend a deadline for taking action under this subpart to a later date. The PBGC will grant such an extension where it finds compelling reasons why it is not administratively feasible for the plan administrator (or other persons acting on behalf of the plan administrator) to take the action until the later date and the delay is brief. The PBGC will consider— ( 1 ) The length of the delay; and
( 2 ) Whether ordinary business care and prudence in attempting to meet the deadline is exercised.
( b ) *Time of extension request.* Any request for an extension under paragraph (a) of this section that is filed later than the 15th day before the applicable deadline must include a justification for not filing the request earlier.
( c ) *IRS determination letter requests.* Any request for an extension under paragraph (a) of this section of the deadline in § 4041.25(c) for submitting a determination letter request to the IRS (in order to qualify for the distribution deadline in § 4041.28(a)(1)(ii)) will be deemed to be granted unless the PBGC notifies the plan administrator otherwise within 60 days after receipt of the request (or, if later, by the end of the PBGC's review period under § 4041.26(a)). The PBGC will notify the plan administrator in writing of the date on which it receives such request.
( d ) *Statutory deadlines not extendable.* The PBGC will not— ( 1 ) *Pre-distribution deadlines.* ( i ) Extend the 60-day time limit under § 4041.23(a) for issuing the notice of intent to terminate; or
( ii ) Waive the requirement in § 4041.24(a) that the notice of plan benefits be issued by the time the plan administrator files the standard termination notice with the PBGC; or
( 2 ) *Post-distribution deadlines.* Extend a filing deadline under § 4041.29(a).
[62 FR 60428, Nov. 7, 1997, as amended at 85 FR 6061, Feb. 4, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Wisconsin Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a community forum of 
the Wisconsin Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10 
a.m. and adjourn at 2 p.m. on September 16, 2011, at the Ramada Inn, 
205 S. Barstow St., Eau Claire, WI 54701. The purpose of the meeting is 
to conduct a community forum on civil rights issues confronting Somali 
immigrants in Western Wisconsin. Participants of the forum will include 
community representatives, government officials, school administrators, 
business leaders, and other interested parties.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by September 23, 2011. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Midwestern Regional 
Office, 55 W. Monroe St., Suite 410, Chicago, IL 60603. Persons wishing 
to email their comments, or to present their comments verbally at the 
meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Carolyn 
Allen, Administrative Assistant, (312) 353-8311, or by e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4b7b5b8b8b1ba94a1a7b7b7a6fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3d0d2dfdfd6ddf3c6c0d0d0c19dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Midwestern Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the 
scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Commission's Midwestern Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Midwestern Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 5, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-20249 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>