34232 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 103 / Friday, May 26, 2000 / Notices

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19

CFR § 207.2(f)).

Mallinckrodt Inc., (Delaware

corporation), 675 McDonnell

Boulevard, Hazelwood, MO 63042.

(c) Jeffrey R. Whieldon, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 401–H, Washington,

DC 20436, who shall be the Commission

investigative attorney, party to this

investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with § 210.13 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a) of the

Commission’s rules, such responses will

be considered by the Commission if

received not later than 20 days after the

date of service by the Commission of the

complaint and the notice of

investigation. Extensions of time for

submitting responses to the complaint

will not be granted unless good cause

therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against such

respondent.

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13269 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731–TA–856 (Final)]

Certain Ammonium Nitrate From

Russia

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Cancellation of hearing,

posthearing briefs, and final comments.

SUMMARY: On May 19, 2000, the

Department of Commerce informed the

Commission that a suspension

agreement had been signed in the

subject investigation. Accordingly, the

Commission hereby cancels the hearing

on the investigation currently scheduled

for May 25, 2000, the posthearing briefs

currently due on June 1, 2000, and the

final comments currently due on June

22, 2000. The Commission unanimously

determined that no earlier

announcement of this cancellation was

possible.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Taylor (202–708–4101), Office of

Investigations, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street SW,

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that

information on this matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility

impairments who will need special

assistance in gaining access to the

Commission should contact the Office

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

Authority: This investigation is being

conducted under authority of title VII of the

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published

pursuant to section 207.21 of the

Commission’s rules (19 CFR § 207.21).

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13267 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–318 (Review)

and 731–TA–538 and 561 (Review)]

Sulfanilic Acid From China and India

Determinations

On the basis of the record 1 developed

in the subject five-year reviews, the

United States International Trade

Commission determines, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930

(19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)), that revocation of

the countervailing duty and

antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic

acid from China and India would be

likely to lead to continuation or

recurrence of material injury to an

industry in the United States within a

reasonably foreseeable time.

Background

The Commission instituted these

reviews on October 1, 1999 (64 FR

53412, October 1, 1999) and determined

on January 7, 2000 that it would

conduct expedited reviews (65 FR 2645,

January 18, 2000). The Commission

transmitted its determinations in these

reviews to the Secretary of Commerce

on May 18, 2000. The views of the

Commission are contained in USITC

Publication 3301 (May 2000), entitled

Sulfanilic Acid From China and India:

Investigations Nos. 701–TA–318

(Review) and 731–TA–538 and 561

(Review).

Issued: May 22, 2000.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13268 Filed 5–25–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Agency Information Collection

Activities; Current Collection;

Comments Requests

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of

Investigation, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection

Under Review; Extension of a Currently

Approved Collection: Hate Crime

Incident Report and Quarterly Hate

Crime Report

The proposed information collection

is published to obtain comments from

the public and affected agencies.

Comments are encouraged and will be

accepted until July 25, 2000.

Request written comments and

suggestions from the public and affected

agencies concerning the proposed

collection of information. Comments

should address one or more of the

following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and