alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ron E. Hooper, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Marine Petroleum Trustfor which Bank of America, N.A. acts as Trustee; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this annual report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s Principal Accounting Officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to theextent I consider reasonable on information provided to me by various workinginterest owners.        Date: September 24, 2004 /s/ RON E. HOOPER   Ron E. Hooper   Senior Vice President Royalty Management onbehalf of Bank of America Private Bank, not inits individual capacity but solely as trustee ofMarine Petroleum Trust
#### § 780.905 Employers who may claim exemption.

A nonfarmer, as well as a farmer, who has an employee engaged in the operations specified in section 13(b)(16) may take advantage of the exemption. Employees of contractual haulers, packers, processors, wholesalers, “bird-dog” operators, and others may qualify for exemption. If an employee is engaged in the specified operations, the exemption will apply “whether or not” these operations are “performed by the farmer” who has grown the harvested fruits and vegetables. Where such operations are performed by the farmer, the engagement by his employee in them will provide a basis for exemption under section 13(b)(16) without regard to whether the farmer is performing the operations as an incident to or in conjunction with his farming operations.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12965]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33875]


The Kansas City Southern Railway Company--Trackage Rights 
Exemption--Illinois Central Railroad Company

    Illinois Central Railroad Company (IC) has agreed to grant overhead 
trackage rights to The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCS) 
between a connection at Eastbridge Junction in Jefferson Parish, LA, at 
IC's milepost 906.73 in its McComb District, to a connection at Lampert 
Junction, in Orleans Parish, LA, at IC's milepost 921.3, in its McComb 
District, a distance of 2.8 miles.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after 
May 12, 2000.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.4(g), a railroad must file a 
verified notice with the Board at least 7 days before the trackage 
rights are to be consummated. In its verified notice, IC indicated 
that it proposed to consummate the transaction on or about May 11, 
2000. Because the verified notice was filed on May 5, 2000, 
consummation would not take place until May 12, 2000. IC's 
representative has been contacted and has confirmed that the 
consummation could not take place before May 12, 2000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the trackage rights is to allow KCS a more direct 
access to the New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Company than it 
currently has, and to allow KCS to avoid operations through two heavily 
used yard facilities at IC's Mays Yard and KCS' West Yard.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33875, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must 
be served on William A. Mullins, 1300 I Street NW, Suite 500, 
Washington, DC 30005-3314.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: May 17, 2000.
    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-12965 Filed 5-23-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES M. HANSEN

, Appellant,

v.

SHAWN MILLER , CRAFT MASTER CUSTOM POOLS, J. & J. HANSEN,

INC., and REHANNON MILLER

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 2617

[ May 5, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Steven J. Levin , Judge; L.T. Case No. 432018CA000398

.

R. Scott Clayton of Linkhorst & Hockin, P.A., Jupiter, for appellant.

Jacob E. Ensor and Lauren A. Carroll of Ross Ear le Bonan & Ensor,

P.A., Stuart, for appellee Shawn Miller

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, L EVINE

, and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March 23, 2011 |   |   /s/ R. LaDuane Clifton |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|           |   | Name:                         | R. LaDuane Clifton |
|           |   | Title:                        | Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
791 A.2d 1154

#### Robert A. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Board of Probation and Parole, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 20, 2002.

*39
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Visualant, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley E. Sparks, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:
 
 (1)  the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
   /s/
Bradley E. Sparks
 Bradley
E. Sparks
 Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
 
 
 Date:  February
23, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |                                                                     
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 29, 2003 |  |                                                                     
|                    |  |                                                                     
|                    |  | /s/ Michael J. Culotta                                              
|                    |  |                                                                     
|                    |  | Michael J. Culotta
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to
liability pursuant to that section. Such certification shall not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
From: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Gabrielle Stevens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/07/2012 04:54 PM

Subject: interagency review emails for docket

Hey John,

Please docket these with the other interagency review email traffic.

Sincerely,

Jeb Stenhouse

Chief, Program Development Branch

Clean Air Markets Division

Environmental Protection Agency

202-343-9781

stenhouse.jeb@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 04:50 PM -----

From: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>, Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/07/2012 04:34 PM

Subject: Re: ROCIS open for amendment

Chrisitne - just acknowledging receipt of your message and that we expect imminent upload of the final revisions 

rule into ROCIS. Confirmation should be sent to you very shortly. 

 From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov]

 Sent: 02/07/2012 09:25 PM GMT

 To: Richard Haeuber; Jeb Stenhouse

 Subject: ROCIS open for amendment

Hi guys,

ROCIS is open for amendment. Please ask OP to upload the final rule and let us know when it’s there. 

Thanks,

Christine

----- Forwarded by Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 04:50 PM -----

From: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/07/2012 04:45 PM

Subject: Re: ROCIS open for amendment

Christine - OP has told us that the final revisions rule is now in ROCIS as requested.

Sincerely,

Jeb Stenhouse
Chief, Program Development Branch

Clean Air Markets Division

Environmental Protection Agency

202-343-9781

stenhouse.jeb@epa.gov

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/07/2012 04:25 PM

Subject: ROCIS open for amendment

Hi guys,

ROCIS is open for amendment. Please ask OP to upload the final rule and let us know when it’s there. 

Thanks,

Christine
### NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 466

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E BILFINGER WESTCON, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes

O r der Per Curiam

Relator Bilfinger Westcon, Inc. f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

cause on September 25, 2019

. In sum, r elator contends that the trial court abused its

discretion by ordering relator to respond to ov erbroad and irrelevant discovery requests.

T he Court requests that the real part ies in interest

, Heavy Equipment Movers &

Installation, LLC ; CMPM Management/Consulting Firm LLC ; Kevin Maxwell ; and

Advantage Industrial Systems, LLC ; or any others whose interest would be directly

affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or2 before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2,

52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

27th day of September , 2019

.
§ 503.40 Applicability of procedures and rules. ( a ) The procedures and rules contained in this subpart prescribe the administrative appeal process that will be applied with respect to a determination to assess civil money penalties, to debar, to enforce provisions of the job order or provisions under 8 U.S.C. 1184(c), 20 CFR part 655, subpart A, or the regulations in this part, or to the collection of monetary relief due as a result of any violation.
( b ) With respect to determinations as listed in paragraph (a) involving provisions under 8 U.S.C. 1184(c), the procedures and rules contained in this subpart will apply regardless of the date of violation.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-053]


NASA Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: Tuesday, June 6, 2000, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Wednesday, 7, 2000, 
8 a.m. to 10 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Williamsburg Hospitality House, 415 Richmond Road, 
Williamsburg, VA 23185.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathy Dakon, Code Z, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
0732.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Mars Program Independent Assessment Team
--NASA Integrated Action Team
--NASA Intelligent Synthesis Enviroment Program
--NASA Strategic Plan
--Aviation Safety Program Update
--Aerospace System Concepts & Analysis
--Committee/TaskForce/Working Group Reports
--Discussion of Findings and Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: May 17, 2000.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-13349 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### § 502.30 Applicability of procedures and rules.

The procedures and rules contained herein prescribe the administrative process that will be applied with respect to a determination to impose an assessment of civil money penalties, and which may be applied to the enforcement of covered provisions of the work contract as set forth in § 501.10(a), including the collection of unpaid wages due as a result of any violation of the H-2A provisions of the Act or of these regulations. Except with respect to the imposition of civil money penalties, the Secretary may, in the Secretary's discretion, seek enforcement action in Federal court without resort to any administrative proceedings.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 4, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50501 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KEVIN DORAL ROBINSON, also known as KD Robinson, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CR-38-1

-------------------- ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before KING, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This court affirmed the sentence of Kevin Doral Robinson. United States v. Robinson , 115 F. App’x 246 (5th Cir. 2004), cert. granted, vacated and remanded , 125 S. Ct. 1946 (2005). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We requested and received supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of Booker .No. 04-50501 -2- Robinson argues that in light of Booker , his sentence must be vacated because it was based on judicial fact-findings made in violation of the Sixth Amendment. He specifically challenges the constitutionality of the district court’s drug quantity calculation and the enhancement to his sentence for possession of a firearm. Robinson asserts that the record reflects that the district court would “likely” impose a lesser sentence if his case was remanded. As an initial matter, because the Government has not invoked the waiver provisions in the plea agreement, this appeal of Robinson’s sentence is not precluded. See United States v. Story , 439 F.3d 226, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006). Robinson concedes that he did not raise a constitutional challenge to his sentence before the district court and that review is for plain error. See United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). The district court did commit Booker error because Robinson’s sentence was enhanced based on the district court’s findings as to the drug quantity calculation and the firearm enhancement. See Booker , 543 U.S. at 244. However, Robinson fails to meet his burden of showing that the error affected his substantial rights. See Mares , 402 F.3d at 521. There is nothing in the record indicating that the district court would have imposed a lower sentence under an advisory guidelines scheme. See id. Because nothing in the Supreme Court’s Booker decision requires us to change our prior affirmance in this case, weNo. 04-50501 -3- reinstate our judgment affirming Robinson’s conviction and sentence. AFFIRMED.
NUMBER 13-19-00466-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE BILFINGER WESTCON, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Relator Bilfinger Westcon, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above 

cause on September 25, 2019. In sum, relator contends that the trial court abused its 

discretion by ordering relator to respond to overbroad and irrelevant discovery requests. 

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Heavy Equipment Movers & 

Installation, LLC; CMPM Management/Consulting Firm LLC; Kevin Maxwell; and 

Advantage Industrial Systems, LLC; or any others whose interest would be directly 

affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or 
2

before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 

52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

27th day of September, 2019.
Exhibit 32.2


                            Section 906 Certification
                            -------------------------

            The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-K of the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

            The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the MLM Index Fund.


May 16, 2005


/s/ James A. Mehling
-------------------------------------------
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund
#### Patrick J. O’Brien et al., Appellants, v Occidental Chemical Corp. et al., Respondents. Law Firm of Paul William Beltz, P. C., Nonparty Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[698 NYS2d 198]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Same Memorandum as in *O’Brien v Occidental Chem. Corp.*([appeal No. 3] 266 AD2d 915 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Burns, J. — Sanctions.) Present— Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Wisner and Balio, JJ.
#### § 457.15 District Director.

*District Director* means the Director of a district office within the Office of Labor-Management Standards.

[78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013]