alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
209 North Eighth •^ . f-j-/^ . 

Marysville, Kansas66508 ;^'^j';^'PGRT.'^IIOi'! ^'h ^ 

HOME OF THE BLACK SQUIRREL 

CKETOPERATlOl 

Sacramento 

Telephone 785-562-5331 ---^x^ 

Fax 785-562-2449 "^^.. 

September 13, 2010 ^^ •: 

PONY EXPRESS COUhfTRY 

MARYSVILLE " ^t. Joseph 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

US Department of Transportation 

W86-334 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Small Community Air Service Development Program Application, DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0124, City 

of Manhattan, KS 

Dear Secretary Kurland: 

On behalf of the City of Marysville, I am writing in support of the Small Community Air Service 

Development Program Grant for the Manhattan Regional Airport in Manhattan, Kansas. The expansion 

of air services at the Manhattan Regional Airport has been a great way for family and friends who live 

far away to travel economically and efficiently for visits. By providing access to regional hubs like Dallas 

or Chicago, the Manhattan Regional Airport has given residents and companies in our area an 

economical and efficient way to travel to distant cities. The air service expansion has been a tremendous 

boost to the economic development for our rural Community. 

Our City has the opportunity to utilize the service for our official travel to quickly get to our destinations. 

We have heard many positive results from their travel through the Manhattan Regional Airport and 

believe expanding the service will allow more of our regional residents and businesses even greater 

access to jet air service. 

However, it is important for the Manhattan Regional Airport to build on the successes of the first year of 

expanded service by reaching out to those within this largely rural area around Manhattan to make 

them aware of the travel options that exist in Manhattan. For the reasons I have outlined above, it is 

important to both myself, our community, and those we do business with that this airport continue to 

grow and prosper in the future. 

Sincerely, 

City Administrator 

Letter of jupport.doa
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2016]



[[Page 5397]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT926000-11-L19100000-BJ0000-LRCME0R04758]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Montana State Office, 
Billings, Montana, on March 2, 2011.

DATES: Protests of the survey must be filed before March 2, 2011 to be 
considered.

ADDRESSES: Protests of the survey should be sent to Branch of Cadastral 
Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, 
Montana 59101-4669.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marvin Montoya, Cadastral Surveyor, 
Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate 
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, telephone (406) 896-5124 or (406) 
896-5009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Rocky Mountain Region, Billings, Montana, 
and was necessary to determine individual and tribal trust lands.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 26 N., R. 45 E.

The plat, in one sheet, representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines, a portion of the subdivision of 
section 12, the adjusted original meanders of the former left bank of 
the Missouri River, downstream, through section 12, and the subdivision 
of section 12, and the survey of the meanders of the present left bank 
of the Missouri River, downstream, through a portion of section 12, 
Township 26 North, Range 45 East, Principal Meridian, Montana, was 
accepted January 21, 2011.
    We will place a copy of the plat, in one sheet, and related field 
notes we described in the open files. They will be available to the 
public as a matter of information. If the BLM receives a protest 
against this survey, as shown on this plat, in one sheet, prior to the 
date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our 
consideration of the protest. We will not officially file this plat, in 
one sheet, until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all 
protests and they have become final, including decisions or appeals.

    Authority:  43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.

    Dated: January 21, 2011.
James D. Claflin,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-2016 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly warranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 27-28, 2000.
    Time: 7:30 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, Scientist Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E03, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 19, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-13278 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition of Pacific Cart Services, Ltd. at June 30, 2000
(unaudited) and the Statement of Income for three month period ended June 30,
2000 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,955
<PP&E>                                          24,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 740,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,513,899
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,048,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   740,821
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (72,628)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (72,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,628)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Amendment No. 1 to Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.2 

EXECUTION VERSION 
 AMENDMENT NO.
1 TO 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 

This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of
April 10, 2015, by and between Odyssey Marine Enterprises, Ltd., a Bahamas company (the “Company”), whose address is Lyford Financial Centre, Lyford Cay, P.O. Box N-7776, Nassau, and Minera del Norte, S.A. de C.V.
(the “Lender”). The Company and the Lender are referred to herein from time to time collectively as the “Parties”, and each individually, as a “Party”.
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Note. 
 WHEREAS,
the Parties entered into a Promissory Note, dated as of March 11, 2015 (the “Note”); 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to
amend certain terms set forth in the Note; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Note, the Note may only be modified with the
written consent of the Company and the Holder; and 
 WHEREAS, the Lender is currently the Holder of the Note. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants, agreements, representations and warranties set forth herein, and for other good
and valuable consideration, the Parties to this Amendment, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Amendment of Section 2(a) of the Note. Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following provision: 


“(a) Unless otherwise converted as provided herein, the Adjusted Principal Balance will be due and payable in full on
(i) September 30, 2015, (ii) if and only if the Investor shall have terminated the Stock Purchase Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(d)(iii) thereof, March 30, 2016 or (iii) if and only if the Investor shall have
terminated the Stock Purchase Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(d)(v) thereof, on the date of such termination (the “Maturity Date”).” 
  

	2.	Full Force and Effect. From and after the date hereof, all references in the Note to “this Note,” “hereof” or words of similar import shall mean the Note as amended by this Amendment. Except
as expressly set forth herein, the Note shall remain in full force and effect on the terms and conditions set forth therein. 

  

	3.	Miscellaneous. All terms and provisions contained in Section 7 through Section 19 of the Note, including all related definitions, are incorporated herein by reference to the same extent as if expressly
set forth herein. 

 [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first
above written. 
  

					
	ODYSSEY MARINE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
		
	By:		 /s/ Mark D. Gordon

			Name:		Mark D. Gordon
			Title:		Vice President
	
	MINERA DEL NORTE S.A. DE C.V.
		
	By:		 /s/ Alonso Ancira Elizondo

			Name:		Alonso Ancira Elizondo
			Title:		Authorized Person



  
 [Signature Page to
Amendment No. 1 to Promissory Note]
#### Linus Guillory et al., Respondents, v Nautilus Real Estate, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. *882Coyne Electrical Contractors, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Submitted August 21, 1995;

decided November 1, 1995

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
§ 570.109 “Establishment situated in the United States”. ( a ) ( 1 ) The statute does not expressly define “establishment.” Accordingly, the term should be given a meaning which is not only consistent with its ordinary usage, but also designed to accomplish the general purposes of the Act. As normally used in business and in Government, the word “establishment” refers to a distinct physical place of business. This is the meaning attributed to the term as it is used in section 13(a)(2) of the Act.[19] Since the establishments covered under section 12(a) of the Act are those in which goods are produced, the term “establishment” there refers to a physical place where goods are produced. Typical producing establishments are industrial plants, mines, quarries, and the like. The producing establishment, however, need not have a permanently fixed location as is the case with a factory or mine. A boat, for instance, where productive activities such as catching or canning fish are carried on is considered a producing establishment for purposes of section 12(a).
( 2 ) Frequently, questions arise as to what should be considered a single establishment. No hard and fast rule can be laid down which will fix the area of all establishments. Accordingly, a determination of the area contained in a single establishment must be based upon the facts of each individual situation. Facts which are particularly pertinent in this connection, however, are those which relate to the physical characteristics and the manner of operation and control of the business. Sometimes, an establishment may extend over an area of several square miles as is common with farms, logging enterprises, mines, and quarries. On the other hand, it may be confined to a few square feet. A typical illustration of this is a loft building that houses the workshops of hundreds of independent manufacturing firms. Each of the workshops is, for purposes of this section, a separate establishment.
( 3 ) Similar principles are applicable in determining whether several buildings located on the same premises constitute one establishment or more than one. For example, where several factory buildings are located on the same premises and owned and operated by the same person, they are generally to be considered as a single establishment. On the other hand, factory buildings located on the same premises, but owned and operated by different persons, will not ordinarily be treated as a single establishment. Where the several factories, however, are engaged in a joint productive enterprise, they may constitute a single establishment. This is the case, for example, where a large shipyard contains the plants of a number of subcontractors who are engaged in making parts or equipment for the boats that are built in the yard.
( b ) The phrase “situated in the United States” is construed to include any of the 50 States or the District of Columbia or any Territory or possession of the United States.
Footnotes -
570.109
[19] *A. H. Phillips, Inc.* v. *Walling,* 324 U.S. 490. See part 779 (bulletin on the retail and service establishment exemption from the wage and hours provisions) of chapter V of this title.
#### § 780.140 Place of performing the practice as a factor.

So long as the farming operations to which a farmer's practice pertains are performed by him in his capacity as a farmer, the status of the practice is not necessarily altered by the fact that the farming operations take place on more than one farm or by the fact that some of the operations are performed off his farm (*NLRB* v. *Olaa Sugar Co.,* 242 F. 2d 714). Thus, where the practice is performed with respect to products of farming operations, the controlling consideration is whether the products were produced by the farming operations of the farmer who performs the practice rather than at what place or on whose land he produced them. Ordinarily, a practice performed by a farmer in connection with farming operations conducted on land which he owns or leases will be considered as performed in connection with the farming operations of such farmer in the absence of facts indicating that the farming operations are actually those of someone else. Conversely, a contrary conclusion will ordinarily be justified if such farmer is not the owner or a bona fide lessee of such land during the period when the farming operations take place. The question of whose farming operations are actually being conducted in cases where they are performed pursuant to an agreement or arrangement, not amounting to a bona fide lease, between the farmer who performs the practice and the landowner necessarily involves a careful scrutiny of the facts and circumstances surrounding the arrangement. Where commodities are grown on the farm of the actual grower under contract with another, practices performed by the latter on the commodities, off the farm where they were grown, relate to farming operations of the grower rather than to any farming operations of the contract purchaser. This is true even though the contract purports to lease the land to the latter, give him the title to the crop at all times, and confer on him the right to supervise the growing operations, where the facts as a whole show that the contract purchaser provides a farm market, cash advances, and advice and counsel but does not really perform growing operations (*Mitchell* v. *Huntsville Nurseries,* 267 F. 2d 286).
----

----

----

I Meddelelser

Kommissionen

----

Euroens vekselkurs (1)

24. november 2004

(2004/C 288/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Kilde: Referencekurs offentliggjort af Den Europæiske Centralbank.

----

----

Anmeldelse af en planlagt fusion

(Sag COMP/M.3576 — ECT/PONL/Euromax)

(2004/C 288/02)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

(1)EUT L 24 af 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----

----

Anmeldelse af en planlagt fusion

(Sag COMP/M.M.3633 — Alcadis/Isuzu/Mitsubishi/Isuzu Benelux JV)

Det overvejes at behandle denne sag i henhold til den forenklede procedure

(2004/C 288/03)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

(1)EUT L 24 af 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)  Tilgængelig på GD Konkurrence's hjemmeside:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf

----

----

Anmeldelse af en planlagt fusion

(Sag COMP/M.3611 — BorgWarner/BERU)

Behandles eventuelt efter den forenklede procedure

(2004/C 288/04)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

(1)EUT L 24 af 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)  Se GD COMP's websted:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf

----

----

Anmeldelse af en planlagt fusion

(Sag COMP/M.3655 — CERBERUS/PEGUFORM)

Behandles eventuelt efter den forenklede procedure

(2004/C 288/05)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

(1)EUT L 24 af 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)  Se GD COMP's websted:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf

----

----

ENSARTET ANVENDELSE AF DEN KOMBINEREDE NOMENKLATUR (KN)

(Tarifering af varer)

Forklarende bemærkninger vedtaget efter fremgangsmåden i artikel 10, stk. 1, i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 2658/87 af 23. juli 1987 om told- og statistiknomenklaturen og den fælles toldtarif (1), ændret ved Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1558/2004 (2)

(2004/C 288/06)

De »Forklarende bemærkninger til De Europæiske Fællesskabers kombinerede nomenklatur« (3) ændres således:

På side 354 indsættes følgende tekst:

----

(1)EFT L 256 af 7.9.1987, s. 1.

(2)EUT L 283 af 2.9.2004, s. 7.

(3)EFT C 256 af 23.10.2002, s. 1.

----
(75 South. 1004)

#### AMERICAN PEOPLE’S INS. CO. v. LINDSEY.

(1 Div. 239.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 17, 1917.)

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Mobile County; Saffold Bcrney, Judge.

BIUCKEN, J.

Affirmed on certificate.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hours, Earnings, and Employment in Cotton Mills

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Best, Ethel L. (Ethel Lombard). 						*Hours, Earnings, and Employment in Cotton Mills : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 111*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1933,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5409,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF MACDERMID, INCORPORATED

MacDermid's principal subsidiaries, primarily wholly-owned, are as follows:

                                                State of
                                                Incorporation

MacDermid Asia, Ltd                             Hong Kong
MacDermid Benelux BV                            Holland
MacDermid Chemicals, Inc.                       Canada
MacDermid Equipment, Inc.                       Vermont
MacDermid Equipment GmbH                        Germany
MacDermid Espanola, S.A.                        Spain
MacDermid Europe, Incorporated                  Delaware
MacDermid France, S.A.                          France
MacDermid G.B., Ltd.                            United Kingdom
MacDermid GmbH                                  Germany
MacDermid Hong Kong, Ltd.                       Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Belgium NV         Belgium
MacDermid Imaging Technology Europe BV          Holland
MacDermid Italiana SRL                          Italy
MacDermid Korea, Ltd.                           Hong Kong
MacDermid New Zealand, Ltd.                     New Zealand
MacDermid Overseas, Asia, Incorporated          Delaware
MacDermid S.A. (Pty.) Ltd.                      South Africa
MacDermid Singapore, Pte. Ltd.                  Singapore
MacDermid Suisse, S.A.                          Switzerland
MacDermid Taiwan, Ltd.                          Taiwan
Nippon MacDermid Co., Inc.                      Japan

In addition, the Corporation has several non operating subsidiaries which, 
in the aggregate, are not significant.
#### § 779.14 Goods.

The definition in section 3(i) of the Act states that *goods,* as used in the Act, means “goods (including ships and marine equipment), wares, products, commodities, merchandise, or articles or subjects of commerce of any character, or any part or ingredient thereof, but does not include goods after their delivery into the actual physical possession of the ultimate consumer thereof other than a producer, manufacturer, or processor thereof.” The interpretative bulletin on general coverage of the Act, part 776 of this chapter, contains a detailed discussion of the application of this definition and what is included in it.