### Evaluation of Whole-Water Churn Splitters for Suspended-Sediment Sample Collection and Analysis

By: Miya N. Barr**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20185126

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (2.95 MB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

First posted December 7, 2018

**For additional information, contact:**
Director, Central Midwest Water Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey1440 Independence RoadRolla, MO 65401

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) collects a wide range of whole-water samples to test for the many physical and chemical constituents that represent stream conditions at the time of sampling to assess the quality of the Nation’s waters. During sampling efforts, in which a suspended-sediment concentration is one result among a broader suite of constituents, a sample is sometimes composited into a churn splitter and then subdivided for analysis. Five churn splitters—comprising three sizes and two different materials—used by the USGS were tested for single-withdrawal accuracy from one-half of full capacity and for multiple-withdrawal accuracy at varied volumes of fullness to see if churn splitters introduce bias during the collection of sediment samples. Both tests were similar to previously conducted tests for consistency, but the tests conducted in this report also attempted to answer questions that arose during previous evaluations of churn splitters. The purpose of this report is to inform sediment analysts about the capabilities and limitations of all available churn-splitter sizes and materials used by the USGS for the analysis of suspended sediment.

The results indicate that suspended-sediment samples and constituents absorbed into suspended sediment may have substantial bias errors when withdrawn from churn splitters. Results were affected by the settling velocity of sediment particles relative to the resuspension velocities induced by the churning, the effects of prior withdrawals of the water-sediment mixture, and the remaining volume in a churn splitter after samples were withdrawn.

#### Suggested Citation

Barr, M.N., 2018, Evaluation of whole-water churn splitters for suspended-sediment sample collection and analysis: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2018–5126, 25 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20185126.

ISSN: 2328-0328 (online)

#### Table of Contents

- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods and Materials
- Evaluation From Experimental Results
- Summary
- References Cited

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.