alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 102 (Thursday, May 25, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 33888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans, Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 that a Meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Readjustment 
of Veterans will be held June 15 and 16, 2000. This will be a regularly 
scheduled meeting for the purpose of reviewing VA services of veterans, 
and to formulate Committee recommendations and objectives. The meeting 
on both days will be held at The American Legion, Washington Office, 
1608 K Street, NW, Washington, DC. The agenda on both days will 
commence at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn at 4:30 p.m.
    The agenda for Thursday, June 15, will include reviews of Veterans 
Health Administration (VHA) special emphasis programs for prosthetics, 
environmental agents and post-traumatic stress disorder. The agenda for 
both days will also include strategic planning sessions to formulate 
goals and objectives for a Committee field visit to VA facilities to be 
conducted later in the year.
    On Friday, June 16, the Committee will review Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VBA) programs related to PTSD compensation, vocational 
rehabilitation and counseling, and transition assistance.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Those who plan to attend or 
who have questions concerning the meeting may contact Alfonso R. 
Batres, Chief Readjustment Counseling Officer, Department of Veterans 
Affairs Headquarters Office at (202) 273-8967.

    Dated: May 16, 2000.

By Direction of the Secretary.
Marvin R. Eason,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-13168 Filed 5-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
EPA and BorgWarner to Develop Fuel Efficient Technology 

Clean Automotive Technology...

Innovation that Works

April 2006 www.epa.gov/otaq/technology EPA420-F-06-032

 A new technology partnership known as a Cooperative Research and Development 

Agreement (CRADA) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and 

BorgWarner, Inc. was announced on April 18, 2006. The partnership will evaluate 

and determine the commercial viability of newly advanced turbochargers, air 

management, and sensors for use with diesel and high-efficiency gasoline engines. 

 The initial efforts of the CRADA calls for EPA and BorgWarner to evaluate the 

technical and market potential of advanced turbocharger technologies designed to 

preserve and extend the diesel engine’s efficiency, as these engines achieve the next 

generation of diesel emissions requirements.

 The technical challenge has been to make these high-efficiency engines clean 

and cost-effective, while maintaining or improving efficiency. These advanced 

turbocharging technologies are an extremely attractive part of a suite of technologies 

that enable both diesel and high-efficiency gasoline engines to reduce U.S. 

dependence on foreign oil and to reduce emission of greenhouse gases.

 Through the partnership, EPA and BorgWarner will evaluate these advanced 

automotive components that can allow the automotive and trucking industry to 

utilize EPA’s Clean Diesel Combustion (CDC), as well as Homogeneous ChargeCompression Ignition (HCCI) gasoline combustion technologies.

 Broad industry interest in EPA’s Clean Diesel Combustion has accelerated the need 

for more advanced air-boosting systems than are used in today’s diesel.

 In order to meet the progressive requirements for advanced turbocharging and 

boosting systems, BorgWarner and EPA have been working jointly on innovative 

systems for use with CDC and other clean combustion engine technologies. 

 These advanced air management systems provide the technical approaches and 

hardware necessary for ultra-clean diesel engines and gasoline engines to become as 

efficient as diesel engines.
 The advanced enabling technologies, along with CDC and other clean high-efficiency 

gasoline combustion technologies are being created in EPA’s Ann Arbor Laboratory. 

BorgWarner and EPA will work to quickly evaluate and develop these concepts into 

commercially viable advanced turbocharger, air management, and sensor hardware.

 Successful commercialization of these advanced components will result in the use of 

more diesel and high-efficiency gasoline vehicles in the United States –which will:

 Reduce emissions, thereby helping to clean up the environment

 Save consumers money at the pump by reducing fuel consumption

 Reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil, thereby increasing national security.

April 2006 www.epa.gov/otaq/technology EPA420-F-06-032
§ 778.111 Pieceworker. ( a ) *Piece rates and supplements generally.* When an employee is employed on a piece-rate basis, the regular hourly rate of pay is computed by adding together total earnings for the workweek from piece rates and all other sources (such as production bonuses) and any sums paid for waiting time or other hours worked (except statutory exclusions). This sum is then divided by the number of hours worked in the week for which such compensation was paid, to yield the pieceworker's “regular rate” for that week. For overtime work the pieceworker is entitled to be paid, in addition to the total weekly earnings at this regular rate for all hours worked, a sum equivalent to one-half this regular rate of pay multiplied by the number of hours worked in excess of 40 in the week. (For an alternative method of complying with the overtime requirements of the Act as far as pieceworkers are concerned, *see* § 778.418.) Only additional half-time pay is required in such cases where the employee has already received straight-time compensation at piece rates or by supplementary payments for all hours worked. Thus, for example, if the employee has worked 50 hours and has earned $491 at piece rates for 46 hours of productive work and in addition has been compensated at $8.00 an hour for 4 hours of waiting time, the total compensation, $523.00, must be divided by the total hours of work, 50, to arrive at the regular hourly rate of pay—$10.46. For the 10 hours of overtime the employee is entitled to additional compensation of $52.30 (10 hours at $5.23). For the week's work the employee is thus entitled to a total of $575.30 (which is equivalent to 40 hours at $10.46 plus 10 overtime hours at $15.69).
( b ) *Piece rates with minimum hourly guarantee.* In some cases an employee is hired on a piece-rate basis coupled with a minimum hourly guaranty. Where the total piece-rate earnings for the workweek fall short of the amount that would be earned for the total hours of work at the guaranteed rate, the employee is paid the difference. In such weeks the employee is in fact paid at an hourly rate and the minimum hourly guaranty is the regular rate in that week. In the example just given, if the employee was guaranteed $11 an hour for productive working time, the employee would be paid $506 (46 hours at $11) for the 46 hours of productive work (instead of the $491 earned at piece rates). In a week in which no waiting time was involved, the employee would be owed an additional $5.50 (half time) for each of the 6 overtime hours worked, to bring the total compensation up to $539 (46 hours at $11 plus 6 hours at $5.50 or 40 hours at $11 plus 6 hours at $16.50). If the employee is paid at a different rate for waiting time, the regular rate is the weighted average of the 2 hourly rates, as discussed in § 778.115.
[76 FR 18857, Apr. 5, 2011]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 149 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 149

   Expressing the condolences of the Senate on the tragic events at 
                       Virginia Tech University.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2007

Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Webb, Mr. Reid, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Akaka, 
   Mr. Alexander, Mr. Allard, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Bennett, Mr. 
 Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Bond, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Brown, Mr. Brownback, 
Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burr, Mr. Byrd, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Carper, 
 Mr. Casey, Mr. Chambliss, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Mr. 
 Coleman, Ms. Collins, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Corker, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Craig, 
 Mr. Crapo, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Dorgan, 
  Mr. Durbin, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. 
Graham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Hatch, Mrs. 
   Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Kyl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
  Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. 
    Lott, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Martinez, Mr. McCain, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. 
   Menendez, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Nelson of 
 Florida, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Obama, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Reed, Mr. 
 Roberts, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Schumer, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Smith, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Specter, Ms. Stabenow, 
Mr. Stevens, Mr. Sununu, Mr. Tester, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Thune, Mr. Vitter, 
 Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mr. Wyden) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the condolences of the Senate on the tragic events at 
                       Virginia Tech University.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) offers its heartfelt condolences to the victims and 
        their families, and to students, faculty, administration and 
        staff and their families who have been deeply affected by the 
        tragic events that occurred today at Virginia Tech in 
        Blacksburg, Virginia;
            (2) expresses its hope that today's losses will lead to a 
        shared national commitment to take steps that will help our 
        communities prevent such tragedies from occurring in the 
        future; and
            (3) recognizes that Virginia Tech has served as an 
        exemplary institution of teaching, learning, and research for 
        well over a century; and that the University's historic and 
        proud traditions will carry on.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

Cybex International, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms S-3
(Nos. 333-34309, 333-118475 and 333-114028) and in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-79899, 333-29045, 33-46109, 33-46110, 33-48124, 33-59947, 33-59945, 333-97379, and 333-97377) of Cybex International, Inc. of our report dated March
21, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cybex International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and other comprehensive income
(loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Cybex International, Inc.



Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of January 1, 2002.



/s/ KPMG LLP



|                          
|--------------------------
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|March 30, 2005
#### § 784.130 “At sea.”

The “at sea” requirement must be construed in context and in such manner as to accomplish the statutory objective. The section 13(a)(5) exemption is for the “catching, taking, propagating, harvesting,” etc., of “aquatic forms of animal and vegetable life.” There is no limitation as to where these activities must take place other than, as the legislative history indicates, that they are “offshore” activities. Since the purpose of the 1961 amendments is to exempt the “first processing, canning, or packing such marine products at sea as an incident to, or in conjunction with, such fishing operations,” it would frustrate this objective to give the phrase “at sea” a technical or special meaning. For example, to define “at sea” to include only bodies of water subject to the ebb and flow of the tides or to saline waters would exclude the Great Lakes which obviously would not comport with the legislative intent. On the other hand, one performing the named activities of first processing, canning, or packing within the limits of a port or harbor is not performing them “at sea” within the meaning of the legislative intent although the situs of performance is subject to tidewaters. In any event it would not appear necessary to draw a precise line as to what constitutes “at sea” operations, for, as a practical matter, such first processing, canning, or packing operations are those closely connected with the physical catching of the fish and are performed on the fishing vessel shortly or immediately following the “catching” and “taking” of the fish.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF11-8-000]


Bonneville Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on August 1, 2011, the Bonneville Power 
Administration submitted its Proposed 2012 Wholesale Power and 
Transmission Rates Rate Adjustment, for confirmation and approval, to 
be effective October 1, 2011.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1f7f4e3f2fedfddd8dfd4e2c4c1c1dec3c5f1d7d4c3d29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="064043544549686a6f686355737676697472466063746528616970">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 31, 2011.

    Dated: August 5, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20431 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                           LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Report of LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
C. Donahey, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 13, 2002                    /s/ Kenneth C. Donahey
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Kenneth C. Donahey,
                                         Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         President
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

d0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

142266(62)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142266 COA: 293239 Kent CC: 09-001677-FH CHARLES DAVID POST, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 4, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Van Koevering, Appellant.

[698 NYS2d 182]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: With respect to the contention of defendant that his suppression motion should have been granted, we affirm for reasons stated in the decision *907at Wayne County Court (Kehoe, J.). By failing to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see, People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665; *People v McGovern,*265 AD2d 881). We reject defendant’s contention that this is one of those rare case exceptions to the preservation rule *(see, People v Lopez, supra,*at 666; *People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725, 726, *rearg denied*86 NY2d 839). Finally, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Kehoe, J.— Assault, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Callahan, JJ.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | By: | /s/ Antoine J. Lafargue |   |
|   |   |   | Antoine J. Lafargue, Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
|   |   |   | (as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | September 24, 2012 |   |   |   |
(79 South. 146)

#### PEAVEY v. STATE.

(5 Div. 286.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 14, 1918.)

Criminal Law &wkey;>1094 — Appeal—Absence op Bill op Exceptions.

On appeal on the record proper without bill of exceptions, where there is nothing in the record authorizing a reversal, the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Elmore County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Elmore Peavey was convicted of forgery in the second degree, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of forgery in the second degree, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of two year. This appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. We find nothing in the record authorizing a reversal of the judgment from which the appeal is taken. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Ted R. Sharp

DATE:  March 21, 2011

Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 500.52 Right to hearing.

Any applicant or holder who desires an administrative hearing on the determination to refuse to issue or to renew, or to suspend or to revoke, a Certificate of Registration or a Farm Labor Contractor Employee Certificate of Registration, shall make a request in accordance with § 500.212, no later than thirty (30) days after service of the notice referred to in § 500.210.
Exhibit 23-a

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
registration statement file nos. 33-40356, 33-40357, 33-52635, 33-52637, 33-58407, 33-58409, 33-59445, 333-02133, 333-07309, 333-15283, 333-25241, 333-25569, 333-25623, 333-32023, 333-32416,
333-37419, 333-37619, 333-37898, 333-37900, 333-40354, 333-42642, 333-47590, 333-47656, 333-66169, 333-80943, 333-80945, 333-88669, 333-94059, 333-94977, 333-56806, 333-56808, 333-61488, 333-61490,
333-56356, and 333-56418.

/s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLPArthur Andersen LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
July 11, 2001

---

QuickLinks