alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

★(Star Print)

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 226 

Recognizing the month of November 2007 as ‘‘National Homeless Youth 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2007 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. BROWN, 

Mr. INOUYE, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. BAYH, 

Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. CASEY, Mr. NELSON of Florida, and Mr. KENNEDY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JULY 11, 2007 

Committee discharged; considered, amended and agreed to and with an 

amendment to the title 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the month of November 2007 as ‘‘National 

Homeless Youth Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas between 1,300,000 and 2,800,000 children and 

teens are homeless in the United States each year, with 

many staying on the streets or in emergency shelters; 

Whereas families with children are the fastest growing segment of the homeless population and now make up approximately 1⁄3 of that population; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

SRES 226 ATS1S 

Whereas homeless youth are typically too poor to secure basic 

needs and are unable to access adequate medical or mental health care; 

Whereas each day 13 homeless youth die due to physical assault, illness, or suicide; 

Whereas many youth become homeless due to a lack of financial and housing resources as they exit juvenile corrections and foster care; 

Whereas 25 percent of foster youth experienced homelessness 

within 2 to 4 years after exiting foster care; 

Whereas homeless youth are most often expelled from their 

homes by their guardians after physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or separated from their parents through 

death or divorce without adequate resources; and 

Whereas awareness of the tragedy of youth homelessness and 

its causes must be heightened so that greater support for 

effective programs involving businesses, families, law enforcement agencies, schools, and community and faithbased organizations, aimed at helping youth remain off 

the streets becomes a national priority: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the values and efforts of busi3 nesses, organizations, and volunteers dedicated to 

4 meeting the needs of homeless children and teens; 

5 (2) applauds the initiatives of businesses, orga6 nizations, and volunteers that employ time and re7 sources to build awareness of the homeless youth 

8 problem, its causes, and potential solutions, and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

SRES 226 ATS1S 

1 work to prevent homelessness among children and 

2 teens; and 

3 (3) should recognize the month of November as 

4 ‘‘National Homeless Youth Awareness Month’’ and 

5 encourages these businesses, organizations, and vol6 unteers to continue to intensify their efforts during 

7 the month of November 2007. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
§ 778.333 Suggestion system awards. The question has been raised whether awards made to employees for suggestions submitted under a suggestion system plan are to be regarded as part of the regular rate. There is no hard and fast rule on this point as the term “suggestion system” has been used to describe a variety of widely differing plans. It may be generally stated, however, that prizes paid pursuant to a bona fide suggestion system plan may be excluded from the regular rate at least in situations where it is the fact that: ( a ) The amount of the prize has no relation to the earnings of the employee at his job but is rather geared to the value to the company of the suggestion which is submitted; and
( b ) The prize represents a bona fide award for a suggestion which is the result of additional effort or ingenuity unrelated to and outside the scope of the usual and customary duties of any employee of the class eligible to participate and the prize is not used as a substitute for wages; and
( c ) No employee is required or specifically urged to participate in the suggestion system plan or led to believe that he will not merit promotion or advancement (or retention of his existing job) unless he submits suggestions; and
( d ) The invitation to employees to submit suggestions is general in nature and no specific assignment is outlined to employees (either as individuals or as a group) to work on or develop; and
( e ) There is no time limit during which suggestions must be submitted; and
( f ) The employer has, prior to the submission of the suggestion by an employee, no notice or knowledge of the fact that an employee is working on the preparation of a suggestion under circumstances indicating that the company approved the task and the schedule of work undertaken by the employee.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 824 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 824

      To amend Public Law 106-348 to extend the authorization for 
establishing a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to 
honor veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2007

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend Public Law 106-348 to extend the authorization for 
establishing a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to 
honor veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHING DISABLED VETERANS 
              MEMORIAL.

    Public Law 106-348 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``The establishment'' and inserting 
                ``Except as provided in subsection (e), the 
                establishment''; and
                    (B) by striking ``the Commemorative Works Act (40 
                U.S.C. 1001 et seq.)'' and inserting ``chapter 89 of 
                title 40, United States Code'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``section 8(b) of the Commemorative 
                Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1008(b))'' and inserting ``section 
                8906 of title 40, United States Code'';
                    (B) by striking ``or upon expiration of the 
                authority for the memorial under section 10(b) of such 
                Act (40 U.S.C. 1010(b)),''; and
                    (C) by striking ``section 8(b)(1) of such Act (40 
                U.S.C. 1008(b)(1)'' and inserting ``8906(b)(2) or (3) 
                of such title''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Termination of Authority.--Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of 
title 40, United States Code, the authority to establish a memorial 
under this section shall expire on October 24, 2015.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 4001.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *In general.* This part contains definitions of certain terms used in this chapter and the regulations under which the PBGC makes various controlled group determinations.
( b ) *Title IV coverage.* Coverage by section 4050 of ERISA is not and does not result in or confer coverage by title IV of ERISA.
[61 FR 34010, July 1, 1996, as amended at 82 FR 60817, Dec. 22, 2017]
§ 801.62 Caption of proceeding. ( a ) Each administrative proceeding instituted under the Act and this part shall be captioned in the name of the person requesting such hearing, and shall be styled as follows: In Matter of __________, Respondent.
( b ) For the purposes of administrative proceedings under the Act and this part the “Secretary of Labor” shall be identified as plaintiff and the person requesting such hearing shall be named as respondent.
#### § 570.120 Eighteen-year minimum.

To protect young workers from hazardous employment, the FLSA provides for a minimum age of 18 years in occupations found and declared by the Secretary to be particularly hazardous or detrimental to the health or well-being for minors 16 and 17 years of age. Hazardous occupations orders are the means through which occupations are declared to be particularly hazardous for minors. Since 1995, the promulgation and amendment of the hazardous occupations orders have been effectuated under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.* The effect of these orders is to raise the minimum age for employment to 18 years in the occupations covered. Seventeen orders, published in subpart E of this part, have thus far been issued under the FLSA and are now in effect.

[75 FR 28458, May 20, 2010]
§ 780.918 Requisites for exemption generally. Section 13(b)(16), in clause (B), provides an exemption from the minimum wage and overtime pay provisions of the Act for an employee during any workweek in which all the following conditions are satisfied: ( a ) The employee must be engaged “in transportation” of harvest workers; and
( b ) The harvest workers transported must be “persons employed or to be employed in the harvesting of fruits or vegetables”; and
( c ) The employee's transportation of such harvest workers must be “between the farm and any point within the same State.”
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection with the Annual Report of Magellan Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William H. Hastings, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: September 28, 2010
#### In the Matter of John P., Respondent, v Linda P., Appellant.

Submitted June 17, 1996;

decided September 12, 1996

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). Motion for leave to appeal denied.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 105 (Wednesday, May 31, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to approved Tribal-State compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988, Pub. L. 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on 
Indian lands. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Department of 
the Interior, through his delegated authority, has approved Amendment 
IV to the Tribal-State Compact for Regulation of Class III Gaming 
Between the Burns--Paiute Tribe and the State of Oregon, which was 
executed on March 31, 2000.

DATES: This action is effective May 31, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: May 18, 2000.
Kevin Gover.
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 00-13494 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
#### § 784.144 Preliminary processing by the canner.

The mere fact that operations preparatory to canning are physically separated from the main canning operations of hermetically sealing and sterilizing or pasteurizing would not be sufficient to remove them from the scope of section 13(b)(4). Where preparatory operations such as the steaming or shucking of oysters are performed in an establishment owned, operated, or controlled by a canner of seafood as part of a process consisting of continuous series of operations in which such products are hermetically sealed in containers and sterilized or pasteurized, all employees who perform any part of such series of operations on any portion of such aquatic products for canning purposes are within the scope of the term “canning.”
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JACK GRAY, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

May 13, 1912.

ADULTERY: Circumstantial Evidence: Instructions. An instruction on circumstantial evidence which is not alone relied upon by the' State for conviction, need not be given at all by the court. But if, nevertheless, the court should give one on that head, it should embrace all the elements governing the probative force of such evidence.

- Appeal from Boone Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *D. H. Harris,*Judge,

Reversed and remanded.

*Gillespie & Conley*for appellant.

*E. C. Anderson*and *W. H. Sapp*for respondent.

ELLISON, J.

Defendant, an unmarried man, was indicted and convicted of living in open and notorious adultery with a married woman.

There was evidence, direct and also circumstantial, tending to prove defendant’s guilt. The court gave an instruction at the instance of the state, on ■circumstantial evidence, in these words: The court instructs the jury that it is not necessary to prove the defendant is guilty by the testimony of witnesses who may have seen the~ offense committed; guilt may be shown by proof of facts and circumstances from which it may be reasonably and satisfactorily inferred.”

This instruction omitted essential elements necessary to make circumstantial evidence sufficient foundation for a conviction, such as that the circumstances relied upon should be consistent with each other and with defendant’s guilty and be such as to exclude to a moral certainty every other reasonable hypothesis *697but that of guilt. [State v. Moxley, 102 Mo. 374; State v. Taylor, 111 Mo. 538 ; State v. Sasseen, 75 Mo. App. 197.]

It is claimed by tbe state that such rule is only applicable where all the evidence is circumstantial. That is a mistake. The ruling of the Supreme Court is that it is not necessary to give an instruction on circumstantial evidence at all unless that character of evidence alone is relied upon for conviction. [State v. Crone, 209 Mo. 316.] But though not necessary that the court give such instruction, yet if the court does give one, “it should cover the subject fully, and give such an instruction as has frequently met with approval by this court.” [State v. Salmon, 216 Mo. 466, 529.]

The first instruction for the state is so restricted that it does not embrace all the elements of the crime charged. [State v. Chandler, 132 Mo. 155; State v. Sekrit, 130 Mo. 401.]

Objections to evidence seem not to have been followed by exceptions and need not be noticed. The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

All concur.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Wayne Bassham and Todd Albiston, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *11/07/07*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Wayne Bassham***           |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|--------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Wayne Bassham***              |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *President and Director***     |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Bear Lake Recreation, Inc.*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                       |
| *Date:*** | *11/07/07*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Todd Albiston***           |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Todd Albiston***              |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Secretary and Director***     |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Bear Lake Recreation, Inc.*** |
#### § 541.101 Business owner.

The term “employee employed in a bona fide executive capacity” in section 13(a)(1) of the Act also includes any employee who owns at least a bona fide 20-percent equity interest in the enterprise in which the employee is employed, regardless of whether the business is a corporate or other type of organization, and who is actively engaged in its management. The term “management” is defined in § 541.102. The requirements of Subpart G (salary requirements) of this part do not apply to the business owners described in this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                                 Razorfish, Inc.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Razorfish, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10Q/A for the interim period ended June 30,2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jean-Philippe Maheu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 20, 2002               By: /s/ Jean-Philippe Maheu
      ---------------                   ----------------------------
                                        Jean-Philippe Maheu
                                        Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAMON CAMPA SOVERANES,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00307-CR

Appeal from the

195th District Court

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# F-1452686-N)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is State’s request to supplement the reporter’s record and to 

extend the time for filing its brief. The motion is GRANTED.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the Official Court Reporter for the 195th District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas to submit a supplemental reporter’s record containing a copy of State’s 

Exhibit 1. The supplemental reporter’s record is due with this Court on or before July 1, 2016.

In the event that State’s Exhibit 1 has been lost or destroyed, the court reporter is directed to 

notify the Court immediately. Further, the State’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is 

granted until June 17, 2016. The State also requests that the appeal be abated, but the Court has 

determined that abatement is unnecessary at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2016.

 PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
§ 793.4 General requirements for exemption. All of the following requirements must be met in order that an employee may be exempt under section 13(b) (9): ( a ) The employee must be “employed as” an announcer, or a news editor, or a chief engineer.
( b ) The employee must be employed “by” a radio or television station.
( c ) The major studio of such radio or television station must be located in a city or town which meets the prescribed population and locality tests.
§ 4050.205 Filing with PBGC. ( a ) *What to file.* A subpart B plan must file with PBGC the information specified in the missing participants forms and instructions, and if the plan is a transferring plan, payment of— ( 1 ) The benefit transfer amount for the missing distributee; and
( 2 ) Any fee provided for in the missing participants forms and instructions.
( b ) *When to file.* The plan must file the information and payments referred to in paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with the missing participants forms and instructions.
( c ) *Place, method and date of filing; time periods.* ( 1 ) For rules about where to file, see § 4000.4 of this chapter.
( 2 ) For rules about permissible methods of filing with PBGC under this subpart, see subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter.
( 3 ) For rules about the date that a submission under this subpart was filed with PBGC, see subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter.
( 4 ) For rules about any time period for filing under this subpart, see subpart D of part 4000 of this chapter.
( d ) *Supplemental information.* Within 30 days after a written request by PBGC (or such other time as may be specified in the request), the plan administrator of a subpart B plan required to file under paragraph (a) of this section must file with PBGC supplemental information for any proper purpose under the missing participants program.
( e ) *Reliance.* As administrator of the missing participants program, PBGC will rely on determinations made and information reported by plans in connection with the program.