alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11




<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           LCS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE AND
                                  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                             For the Years Ended September 30,


                                                   1997           1996           1995 (A)
                                                ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>
Primary earnings per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding .......      4,624,702      4,329,663      4,019,576

Weighted average - dilutive stock options .        371,985        627,947        540,693

Shares issuable in connection with the
   acquisition of Catalog Resources, Inc. .        107,151        160,475        195,096
                                                ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                 5,103,838      5,118,085      4,755,365
                                                ==========     ==========     ==========

Net income ................................     $6,986,659     $7,837,645     $6,328,592

Primary earnings per share and common
   equivalent share .......................     $     1.37     $     1.53     $     1.33
                                                ==========     ==========     ==========


Fully diluted earnings per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding .......      4,624,702      4,329,663      4,019,576

Weighted average - dilutive stock options .        447,903        634,430        835,286

Shares issuable in connection with the
   acquisition of Catalog Resources, Inc. .        107,151        160,475        195,096
                                                ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                 5,179,756      5,124,568      5,049,958
                                                ==========     ==========     ==========

Net income ................................     $6,986,659     $7,837,645     $6,328,592

Fully diluted earnings per share and common
   equivalent share .......................     $     1.35     $     1.53     $     1.25
                                                ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>


(A)    All shares and  equivalent  shares reflect the 10% stock dividend paid in
       January,  1995 and the 2 for 1 stock  split  paid as a 100%  dividend  on
       October 24, 1995.
#### § 780.612 Employment by a “farmer.”

A further requirement for exemption is the expressed statutory one that the employee must be employed in agriculture by a “farmer.” Employment by a nonfarmer will not qualify an employee for the exemption.
#### § 783.41 “Numbered” vessel.

A vessel “numbered under the laws of the United States” means a vessel numbered pursuant to the provisions of Federal law, including vessels numbered under any State numbering system approved by the Secretary of the Department under which the U.S. Coast Guard is operating, in accordance with section 2(c) of the Federal Boating Act of 1958 (46 U.S.C. 527-527h). Generally, any vessel, which is not required to have and does not have, a valid marine document issued by the Bureau of Customs and is propelled by machinery of more than 10 horsepower, whether or not such machinery is the principal source of propulsion, is required to be numbered in conformity with the Federal Boating Act of 1958 if it uses the navigable waters of the United States, its Territories, or the District of Columbia, or is owned in a State and uses the high seas (46 U.S.C. 527(a)). The requirements and procedures of this Act are explained in detail in 46 CFR part 170.
#### § 794.127 Exemption conditioned on making 75 percent of sales within the State.

A further requirement of the section 7(b)(3) exemption is that more than 75 percent of the sales of the enterprise engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products (measured by annual dollar volume) must be made “within the State in which such enterprise is located.” This means that over 75 percent of the annual dollar volume of sales must be from sales to customers within the same State in which the enterprise is located. If 25 percent or more of its sales volume is from sales to customers outside the State of its location, the requirement is not met and the enterprise cannot qualify for exemption.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                                STATE OF DELAWARE

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            CAPITAL SOLUTIONS I, INC.

First: That the Board of Directors of Capital Solutions I, Inc. (the
"Corporation") by Unanimous Written Consent dated as of June 6, 2005, adopted
resolutions setting forth proposed amendments to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation as heretofore amended, declaring said
amendments to be advisable and calling for the submission of such amendments to
the stockholders of the Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolutions
setting forth the proposed amendments are as follows:

Resolved, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended by
changing Article thereof numbered "Fourth" so that, as amended, said Article
shall be and read as follows:

         FOURTH:

         (a) The total number of shares of stock which this corporation is
authorized to issue is nine hundred and twenty million (920,000,000), consisting
of nine hundred million (900,000,000) shares of common stock, par value
$0.0000001 per share and twenty million (20,000,000) shares of preferred stock,
par value $0.0000001 per share.

         (b) Each ten (10) shares of Common Stock outstanding at 9:00 a.m. on
the effective date, shall be deemed to be one (1) share of Common Stock of the
Corporation, par value $0.0000001 per share. There shall be no fractional
shares. Odd lots shall be rounded up.

         (c) Shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or
more series as may be established from time to time by resolution of the Board
of Directors of the Corporation (hereinafter the "Board"), each of which series
shall consist of such number of shares and have such distinctive designation or
title as shall be fixed by resolution of the Board prior to the issuance of any
shares of such series. Each such class or series of Preferred Stock shall have
such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such
qualifications, limitations or restrictions, thereof, as shall be stated in such
resolution of the Board providing for the issuance of such series of Preferred
Stock.

Second: That pursuant to Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware, a consent setting forth resolutions approving the amendments set
forth above was signed by holders of outstanding stock having not less than the
minimum number of votes necessary to authorize or take action at a meeting at
which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.

Third: That said amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Fourth:  The effective date shall be June 17, 2005.


By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
----------------------------
(Authorized Officer)

Name:   Christopher Astrom
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M. 3558 — CYTEC/UCB-SURFACE SPECIALTIES)

(2004/C 274/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
2008 PM2.5 Plan 

## Chapter 5

Public Accountability2008 PM2.5 Plan This page intentionally blank.San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Polluti on Control District April 30, 2008

Chapter 5: Public Accountability

2008 PM2.5 Plan 5-1 

## Chapter 5: Public Accountability

Although attainment of both the federal PM2.5 standard and the federal 8-hour ozone standard will require efforts fr om the state and federal gov ernments, the District is committed to doing its share. To ensure Distr ict accountability, the District will complete annual reports to show progress in fulfilli ng its ozone and particulate matter (PM) plan commitments. These reports will be made pub licly available and will be presented to the Governing Board each year, beginn ing in 2008. The reports will include:

 A summary of progress made over the most recent calendar year in meeting the schedules for developing, adopting, and im plementing the air pollution control measures in the District’s attainment plans 1

.

 A table summarizing the proposed and actual dates for adoption and implementation of each measure.

 Air quality data from the year, showing progress towards attaining the national ambient air quality standards.

 A report of incentive funding, includi ng the amount of funds awarded and the estimated reductions from grant-funded projec ts. Major elements of this part of the report would incl ude the following:

o Sources of funding

o Expenditures

o Types of projects funded

o Actual versus predicted emissions reductions

o Enforcement activities

 Number and type of inspections conducted on grantees

 Number of all grantees for w hom there is evidence of noncompliance

 List of enforcement actions tak en by the District and the resultant penalties and remedies.

o Description of the permanency of the funding sources and ideas for amending the program in the ev ent of reduced funding.

 The status of vehicle use control measures implemented by city and county governments 2

.

 A comparison of predicted versus curr ent “best estimates” of emissions

reductions for each measure and a short ex planation of any shortfalls or surplus as well as a plan for rectifying shortfalls.

 Status of State of California c ontrol measures (from ARB and DPR)

These reports will be above and beyond any sim ilar reports required by the federal

Clean Air Act or the California Clean Air Act.

1 Required by California Health and Safety Code Section 40924

2 A state requirement, required by ARB’s 1993 Guidance for Annual and Triennial Progress Reports Under the

California Clean Air ActSan Joaquin Valley Unified Air Polluti on Control District April 30, 2008

Chapter 5: Public Accountability

2008 PM2.5 Plan 5-2 This page intentionally blank.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 324 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Life Insurance Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. LOTT, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. TESTER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. SUNUNU, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Life Insurance 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan; 

Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families 

by helping surviving members meet immediate and longterm financial obligations and objectives in the event of 

a premature death in their family; 

Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens 

lack the adequate level of life insurance coverage needed 

to ensure a secure financial future for their loved ones; 

Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by enabling individuals and families to 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 324 ATS 

manage the financial risks of premature death, disability, 

and long-term care; and 

Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2007 as ‘‘National Life Insurance 

Awareness Month’’ as a means to encourage consumers 

to take the actions necessary to achieve financial security 

for their loved ones: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Life Insurance Awareness Month’’; and 

4 (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, lo5 calities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, 

6 and the citizens of the United States to observe the 

7 month with appropriate programs and activities. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50535-50536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20689]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7555]


Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to Lebanon

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117), as carried forward by the Full-Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 112-10) (``the Act''), and 
Department of State

[[Page 50536]]

Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is 
important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with respect to Lebanon 
and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 6, 2011.
Thomas Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State, Management and Resources, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-20689 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
Facts about 

Ebola

in the U.S.

You can’t get Ebola 

through water 

You can’t get Ebola 

through air 

You can’t get Ebola 

through food 

CS250586A

 body fluids, or their meat.

Ebola poses no significant risk to the 

United States. 

You can only get Ebola from:

Touching the blood or body fluids of a person who is sick with or 

 has died from Ebola.

Touching contaminated objects, like needles.





 



Touching infected animals, their blood or other
Editorial Note on Part 7
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 7 appear at 61 FR 19985, May 3, 1996.

§ 7.12 Intervention; other participation. ( a ) For good cause shown, the Board may permit any interested person or party to intervene or otherwise participate in any proceeding held by the Board. Except when requested orally before the Board, a petition to intervene or otherwise participate shall be in writing and shall state with precision and particularity: ( 1 ) The petitioner's relationship to the matters involved in the proceedings; and
( 2 ) The nature of the presentation which he would make.
( b ) Copies of the petition shall be served to all parties or interested persons known to participate in the proceeding, who may respond to the petition. Appropriate service shall be made of any response.
[86 FR 1780, Jan. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 10.38

Oral Agreement to Extend Independent Contactor Agreement



On February 10, 2010, Goldrich Mining Company and Ted R. Sharp, CPA, and his consulting firm Sharp Executive Associates, orally agreed to extend the Independent Contactor Agreement dated March 1, 2006, retroactively to January 1, 2010 for a period until the Company can determine its success in securing financing for its 2010 mining and exploration season.  The parties recognize that the measure to which the Company is successful in its financing will determine the mining and exploration program that the Company may or may not be able to undertake for 2010, and therefore may significantly affect the pricing and terms of a longer term contract.



The agreement was approved by resolution of the board of directors of Goldrich Mining Company dated February 10, 2010.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Kinloch, certify that:

1.            
I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Maverick Minerals
Corporation;

2.            
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.            
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.            
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and I have:

a)            
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)            
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.            
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)            
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)            
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 22, 2008

/s/ Robert KinlochRobert
Kinloch Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
#### § 780.615 Raising of livestock.

Livestock auction operations are within the 13(b)(13) exemption only when they are conducted as an adjunct to the raising of livestock by the farmer. The farmer is required to engage in the raising of livestock as a prerequisite for the exemption of an employee employed in the operations described in section 13(b) (13). Engagement by the farmer in one or more of the other branches of farming will not meet this requirement.
#### § 780.11 Exempt and nonexempt work during the same workweek.

Where an employee in the same workweek performs work which is exempt under one section of the Act and also engages in work to which the Act applies but is not exempt under some other section of the Act, he is not exempt that week, and the wage and hour requirements of the Act are applicable (see *Mitchell* v. *Hunt,* 263 F. 2d 913; *Mitchell* v. *Maxfield,* 12 WH Cases 792 (S.D. Ohio), 29 Labor Cases 69, 781; *Jordan* v. *Stark Bros. Nurseries,* 45 F. Supp. 769; *McComb* v. *Puerto Rico Tobacco Marketing Co-op Ass'n,* 80 F. Supp. 953, affirmed 181 F. 2d 697; *Walling* v. *Peacock Corp.,* 58 F. Supp. 880-883). On the other hand, an employee who performs exempt activities during a workweek will not lose the exemption by virtue of the fact that he performs other activities outside the scope of the exemption if the other activities are not covered by the Act.
#### § 779.116 Custodial and maintenance employees.

Custodial and maintenance employees who perform maintenance and custodial work on the machinery, equipment, or premises where goods regularly are produced for commerce or from which goods are regularly shipped in interstate commerce are engaged in covered activities.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 284 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in City and County of Denver 

v. Susan I. Gomez, Daniel R. Egger, and Carter Merrill. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and legal representation in City and 

County of Denver v. Susan I. Gomez, Daniel R. Egger, 

and Carter Merrill. 

Whereas, in the cases of City and County of Denver v. Susan 

I. Gomez (07GS008693), Daniel R. Egger 

(07GS008692), and Carter Merrill (07GS967589), pending in Denver County Court in Denver, Colorado, testimony has been requested from Matthew Cheroutes, an 

employee in the office of Senator Ken Salazar; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their 

official responsibilities; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

SRES 284 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Matthew Cheroutes and any other em2 ployees of Senator Salazar’s office from whom testimony 

3 may be required are authorized to testify in the cases of 

4 City and County of Denver v. Susan I. Gomez, Daniel R. 

5 Egger, and Carter Merrill, except concerning matters for 

6 which a privilege should be asserted. 

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

8 represent Matthew Cheroutes and other employees of Sen9 ator Salazar’s staff in the actions referenced in section 

10 one of this resolution. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS