alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the body of the Form 10-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,336)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,276
<PP&E>                                          26,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8,037)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,504
<BONDS>                                         38,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           889
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,897
<SALES>                                        127,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,575
<CGS>                                           77,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                       992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
#### § 786.100 Enforcement policy concerning performance of nonexempt work.

The Division has taken the position that the exemption provided by section 13(a)(10) of the Fair Labor Standards Act will be deemed applicable even though some nonexempt work (that is, work of a nature other than that which characterizes the exemption) is performed by the employee during the workweek, unless the amount of such nonexempt work is substantial. For enforcement purposes, the amount of nonexempt work will be considered substantial if it occupies more than 20 percent of the time worked by the employee during the workweek.

[32 FR 15426, Nov. 4, 1967]
EXHIBIT 31.3  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 26, 2007
#### Thomas *v.*The State.

Submitted December 17, 1906,

Decided January 17, 1907.

Accusation of cheating and swindling.' Before Judge Thomas-City court of Baxley. November 7, 1906.

*W. W. Bennett*and *Parker & Moore,*for plaintiff in error.

*V. E. Padgett, solicitor,*contra.

Evans, J.

There being no complaint of error committed by the court-during the progress of the trial, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent..*
---

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Dragon Pharmaceutical Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form 10-Q") that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                                                                            
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |  |                                                                            
|Dated: :  August 14, 2009 |  | ___/s/ Yanlin Han      __________________Yanlin Han
Chief Executive Officer
|Dated: :  August 14,2009  |  | ___/s/  Garry Wong               _______
Garry Wong
Chief Financial Officer





---
#### § 801.6 Notice of protection.

Every employer subject to EPPA shall post and keep posted on its premises a notice explaining the Act, as prescribed by the Secretary. Such notice must be posted in a prominent and conspicuous place in every establishment of the employer where it can readily be observed by employees and applicants for employment. Copies of such notice may be obtained from local offices of the Wage and Hour Division.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1178

## Geophysical Data from offshore of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, Cat Island to Western Horn Island, Mississippi

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
Exhibit 24.1**POWER OF ATTORNEY**     Each person whose name is signed below has made, constituted and appointed, and does herebymake, constitute and appoint, JAMES L. HAMBRICK, CHARLES P. COOLEY and W. SCOTT EMERICK as his orher true and lawful attorney, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead to affix, asattorney-in-fact, his or her signature as a director or officer or both, as the case may be, of TheLubrizol Corporation (“Lubrizol”) to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, including any and allamendments or modifications to such Form 10-K/A, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto andall documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, giving andgranting unto such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform every act and thingwhatsoever necessary to be done in connection with any such filing, as fully as he or she might orcould do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-factshall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.In witness whereof, this Power of Attorney, which may be executed in two or more counterparts, eachof which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which shall together constitute but one andthe same instrument, has been signed as of November 8, 2007.      /s/ James L. Hambrick James L. Hambrick Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration 

Announcement is made of the following Federal Credentialing Program (FCP)Working Meeting scheduled for July 10-13, 2000: 

*Name:*                         Federal Credentialing Program Working Meeting.                     

*Date and Time:*

Monday, July 10, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

Tuesday, July 11, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

Wednesday, July 12, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

Thursday, July 13, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m. 

*Place:*                         The Hilton Alexandria Mark Center, 5000 Seminary Road, Alexandria, VA 22311.                     

This meeting is open to credentialing software developers and data consultants. 

*Agenda:*                         The agenda will include an opening address on Web Technology and Interoperable Systems, and an overview of the FCP Program. Additional presentations include an Introduction to Data Exchange and expert panel presentations on trends in the Development of Standards for Health Care Data Exchange and The Standards Creation Process.                     

This FCP meeting will convene other health care provider professional representatives for work group meetings to be held on Wednesday, July 12, and Thursday, July 13, 2000. The groups will identify the data elements required to credential their professions, and provide an exhibit forum for credentialing software manufacturers. The meeting will provide an open forum for credentialing data, developers and data consultants to discuss design for a new Health Level 7 software developers credentialing data exchange standard. 

For registration information, contact Linda White at 314-894-5747 or by e-mail at whitelin@lrn.va.gov

Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate. 

      ( print page 34490)    
Dated: May 23, 2000. 

Jane M. Harrison, 

Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination. 

[FR Doc. 00-13338 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
#### Sweeney *vs*Craddocks.

Appeal from the Green Circuit.

Ejectment.

*Case*-135.

After verdict, when the date of the demise is imperfectly stated, (as 184 for 1840,) the Court will not presume a date intended which would show the demise to have expired before suit brought.

The tender of the money for land sold within the year, when it is redeemable, renders ineffectualasubsequent deed by the Sheriff to the purchaser.

*Ejectment. Dale, presumption. Redemption of land ■ sold.*

*July*6.

*Harlan fy Craddock and Spencer*for appellant.

Judge Makshall

delivered the opinion of the Court. „

The figures 184, with a blank after them, used in stating the year in which the demise was made, should not, after verdict, be understood as indicating the year one hundred and eighty four, after the birth of Christ; but the 1 must be understood as meaning 1,000, the 8 as 800, and the 4 as 40, showing that the date is imperfectly stated, and that some figure was to have been added. The date should, therefore, be understood as being at least as late as 1840, which would leave many years of the demise unexpired, and a date prior to the accrual of the lessors title will not be assumed after verdict. The motion in arrest was, therefore, properly overruled.

The bill of exceptions does not show any instructions to have been given by the Court. The statement of an instruction in the grounds for a .new trial, does not necessarily prove that it was given. And as the evidence authorized the jury to find a proper tender of the money for redeeming the land within twelve months, after the sale under execution, which, in our opinion, operates, (under the 30th and 31st. section of the execution law of 1828, 1 *Stat. Laws,*650,) to prevent the efficacy of a subsequent deed by the Sheriff, and to defeat the effect of the prior levy and sale, the verdict for the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, and th.e judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
§ 35.32 Mediation. ( a ) *Referral to mediation.* CRC will promptly refer to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service or the mediation agency designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under 45 CFR part 90, all complaints that: ( 1 ) Fall within the jurisdiction of the Act or this part, unless the age distinction complained of is clearly within an exception; and
( 2 ) Contain all information necessary for further processing, as provided in § 35.31(c)(1).
( b ) *Participation in mediation process.* Both the complainant and the recipient shall participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or to make an informed judgment that an agreement is not possible. The recipient and the complainant do not need to meet with the mediator at the same time, and a meeting may be conducted by telephone or other means of effective dialogue if a personal meeting between the party and the mediator is impractical.
( c ) *When agreement is reached.* If the complainant and the recipient reach an agreement, the mediator shall prepare a written statement of the agreement, have the complainant and recipient sign it, and send a copy of the agreement to CRC.
( d ) *Confidentiality.* The mediator shall protect the confidentiality of all information obtained in the course of the mediation process. No mediator may testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course of the mediation process, unless the mediator has obtained prior approval of the head of the mediation agency.
( e ) *Maximum time period for mediation.* The mediation shall proceed for a maximum of 60 days after a complaint is filed with CRC. This 60-day period may be extended by the mediator, with the concurrence of the Director, for not more than 30 days, if the mediator determines that agreement is likely to be reached during the extended period. In the absence of such an extension, mediation ends if: ( 1 ) Sixty days elapse from the time the complaint is filed; or
( 2 ) Prior to the end of the 60-day period, either ( i ) An agreement is reached; or
( ii ) The mediator determines that agreement cannot be reached.
( f ) *Unresolved complaints.* The mediator shall return unresolved complaints to CRC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>         5
  <LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1998 and the consolidated 
statement of earnings for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998 included in 
Exhibit 13 to the 1998 Form 10-K Annual Report of MacDermid, Incorporated and 
is qualified in its entirety to such statements.

<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                          3549
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   76273
<ALLOWANCES>                    3598
<INVENTORY>                     49639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                132088
<PP&E>                          87793
<DEPRECIATION>                  44847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  300260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           86003
<BONDS>                         103983
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        39265
<OTHER-SE>                      66280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    300260
<SALES>                         314058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                314058
<CGS>                           152189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   265952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                113763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                817
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              7758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 48106
<INCOME-TAX>                    17309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             30488
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    30488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.20

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Maverick Minerals Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)            
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 22, 2008





/s/ Robert KinlochRobert
Kinloch Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 1614.502 Compliance with final Commission decisions. ( a ) Relief ordered in a final Commission decision is mandatory and binding on the agency except as provided in this section. Failure to implement ordered relief shall be subject to judicial enforcement as specified in § 1614.503(g).
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, when the agency requests reconsideration and the case involves removal, separation, or suspension continuing beyond the date of the request for reconsideration, and when the decision orders retroactive restoration, the agency shall comply with the decision to the extent of the temporary or conditional restoration of the employee to duty status in the position specified by the Commission, pending the outcome of the agency request for reconsideration. ( 1 ) Service under the temporary or conditional restoration provisions of this paragraph (b) shall be credited toward the completion of a probationary or trial period, eligibility for a within-grade increase, or the completion of the service requirement for career tenure, if the Commission upholds its decision after reconsideration.
( 2 ) When the agency requests reconsideration, it may delay the payment of any amounts ordered to be paid to the complainant until after the request for reconsideration is resolved. If the agency delays payment of any amount pending the outcome of the request to reconsider and the resolution of the request requires the agency to make the payment, then the agency shall pay interest from the date of the original appellate decision until payment is made.
( 3 ) The agency shall notify the Commission and the employee in writing at the same time it requests reconsideration that the relief it provides is temporary or conditional and, if applicable, that it will delay the payment of any amounts owed but will pay interest as specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Failure of the agency to provide notification will result in the dismissal of the agency's request.
( c ) When no request for reconsideration is filed or when a request for reconsideration is denied, the agency shall provide the relief ordered and there is no further right to delay implementation of the ordered relief. The relief shall be provided in full not later than 120 days after receipt of the final decision unless otherwise ordered in the decision.
[57 FR 12646, Apr. 10, 1992, as amended at 64 FR 37660, July 12, 1999; 77 FR 43506, July 25, 2012]