UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                   ----------
                                  FORM 10-QSB/A
                                (Amendment No. 1)

         (Mark One)
|X|      QUARTERLY  REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE
         ACT OF 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

|_|      TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

                  For the transition period from _____ to _____



                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-25675

                              PATRON SYSTEMS, INC.
        (EXACT NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

            DELAWARE                                      74-3055158
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF                (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
 INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)

            5775 FLATIRON PARKWAY, SUITE 230                 80301
                      BOULDER, CO
        (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)           (ZIP CODE)

                                 (303) 541-1005
                           (ISSUER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the Registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |_| No |X|

Indicate by check mark whether the  registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|


State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity,  as of the latest  practicable  date:  1,879,946  shares of common stock
outstanding as of May 11, 2006.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):  Yes |_|   No |X|


<PAGE>


                              PATRON SYSTEMS, INC.

                         FORM 10-QSB/A QUARTERLY REPORT
                       ----------------------------------

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                              PAGE
------------------------------                                              ----

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS...................................................4

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2006 (Unaudited).............4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months
         Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited).............................5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the
         Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 (Unaudited).........................6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months
         Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited).............................7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)...............8

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
         CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS..................................34


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
---------------------------

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS..............................................................47

SIGNATURES....................................................................48


                                       2
<PAGE>


                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

Patron Systems,  Inc. is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-QSB (the "Form  10-QSB") for the  quarterly  period ended March 31, 2006
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on May 22, 2006.  This filing
amends and restates our previously  reported financial  statements for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 to reflect the  determination by the Company that it
had recorded 1) a net loss of $858,213 on the settlement of various  liabilities
under its creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring program when it should
have recorded a net gain of approximately  $906,987, 2) excess non-cash interest
of $358,000 with respect to a conversion  option that became effective under two
of its Interim Bridge Financing III notes and 3) charged, as interest expense, a
$285,050  fee paid to the  placement  agent  in its  Series  A  Preferred  stock
financing  transaction  that  should have been  recorded  as a reduction  of the
offering  proceeds.  The nature of the adjustments  required in the creditor and
claimant liabilities  restructuring relate to an overvaluation of the Series A-1
preferred   shares  issued  in  the  exchange  offer  offset  by  gains  on  the
extinguishment  of liabilities that originated in connection with obligations to
issue or repurchase stock.

This Amendment No. 1 amends and restates the following  items of our Form 10-QSB
as described above: (i) Part I, Item 1 - Financial Statements; (ii) Part I, Item
2 -  Management's  Discussion and Analysis of Result of Operations and Financial
Condition;  and (iii) Part II, Item 6 - Exhibits. This amendment includes in the
calculation of earnings per share the effect of the 1-for-30 reverse stock split
that was effective July 31, 2006.

All  information in our Form 10-QSB,  as amended by this Amendment No. 1, speaks
as to the date of the  original  filing of our Form  10-QSB for such  period and
does not reflect any  subsequent  information  or events except as noted in this
Amendment No. 1. All information contained in this Amendment No. 1 is subject to
updating and  supplementing as provided in our reports,  as amended,  filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  subsequent to the date of the initial
filing of our Form 10-QSB.


                           FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion and explanations should be read in conjunction with the
financial  statements  and  related  notes  contained  elsewhere  in  this  Form
10-QSB/A.  Certain  statements  made in  this  discussion  are  "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private  Securities  Litigation Reform Act
of 1995.  Forward-looking  statements can be identified by  terminology  such as
"may",  "will",  "should",  "expects",  "intends",  "anticipates",   "believes",
"estimates",  "predicts",  or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other
comparable  terminology.  Because  forward-looking  statements involve risks and
uncertainties,  there are important  factors that could cause actual  results to
differ  materially  from those  expressed  or  implied by these  forward-looking
statements.  Although Patron Systems believes that expectations reflected in the
forward-looking  statements are reasonable,  it cannot guarantee future results,
performance  or  achievements.  Moreover,  neither  Patron Systems nor any other
person  assumes  responsibility  for the  accuracy  and  completeness  of  these
forward-looking  statements.  Patron  Systems  is  under no duty to  update  any
forward-looking  statements  after  the  date of this  report  to  conform  such
statements to actual results.


                                       3
<PAGE>


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

                          ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                      PATRON SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                                     MARCH 31,
                                                                       2006
                                                                   (AS RESTATED)
                                                                   ------------
ASSETS
Current Assets
  Cash and cash equivalents ..................................     $    141,430
  Restricted cash ............................................        1,468,813
  Accounts receivable, net ...................................           55,545
  Other current assets .......................................          135,059
                                                                   ------------
     Total current assets ....................................        1,800,847

Property and equipment, net ..................................          101,544
Intangible assets, net .......................................        1,385,717
Unbilled accounts receivable .................................           54,654
Net assets of discontinued operation .........................           94,277
Goodwill .....................................................        9,510,716
                                                                   ------------
     Total assets ............................................     $ 12,947,755
                                                                   ============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
  Accounts payable ...........................................     $  1,239,813
  Accrued payroll and related expenses .......................          447,253
  Accrued interest ...........................................          744,679
  Notes payable (to creditors of acquired business);
     including $1,538,129 to related parties .................        1,790,911
  Demand notes payable .......................................          471,056
  Expense reimbursements due to officers and
     stockholders ............................................          166,183
  Accrued registration penalty ...............................           84,780
  Deferred revenue ...........................................          190,009
  Notes payable to officers and stockholders .................          235,712
  Other current liabilities ..................................          515,173
  Bridge notes payable .......................................        1,544,975
  Net liabilities of discontinued operations .................           30,201
                                                                   ------------
     Total current liabilities ...............................        7,460,745
                                                                   ------------

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders' Equity
  Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share,
    75,000,000 shares authorized,
       - Series A Convertible: 2,160 shares authorized;
           893 shares issued and outstanding .................                9
           liquidation preference of $6,030,909
       - Series A-1 convertible: 50,000,000 authorized;
           33,420,078 issued and outstanding .................          334,201
           liquidation preference of $26,736,063
  Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 150,000,000
     shares authorized, 1,879,946 shares issued and
     outstanding .............................................           18,800
  Additional paid-in capital .................................       91,513,851
  Accumulated deficit ........................................      (86,379,851)
                                                                   ------------
     Total stockholders' equity ..............................        5,487,010
                                                                   ------------
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity ..............     $ 12,947,755
                                                                   ============

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


                                       4
<PAGE>


                       PATRON SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      2006             2005
                                                  (AS RESTATED)
                                                  ------------     ------------
Revenue ......................................    $    261,785     $      6,430
                                                  ------------     ------------
Cost of Sales
  Cost of products/services ..................          29,897            2,003
  Amortization of technology .................          27,522           19,230
                                                  ------------     ------------
    Total cost of sales ......................          57,419           21,233
                                                  ------------     ------------
  Gross profit ...............................         204,366          (14,803)
                                                  ------------     ------------

Operating Expenses
  Salaries and related expenses ..............       1,010,123          370,349
  Professional fees ..........................         658,115          141,401
  General and administrative (includes
     non-employee stock-based
     compensation of $0 and $508,500 for
     the three months ended March 31,
     2006 and 2005, respectively) ............         323,909          722,064
  Amortization of intangibles ................          30,814            8,063
  Stock based penalties under financing
     arrangements ............................           2,852          369,000
  Settlement gain ............................        (906,987)            --
                                                  ------------     ------------
     Total operating expenses ................       1,118,826        1,610,877
                                                  ------------     ------------

Loss from operations .........................        (914,460)      (1,625,680)
                                                  ------------     ------------

Other Income (Expense)
  Interest income ............................            --             19,250
  Interest expense ...........................        (972,464)        (494,988)
  Gain on sale of property and equpment ......              62             --
                                                  ------------     ------------
Total Other Expense ..........................        (972,402)        (475,738)
                                                  ------------     ------------
     Loss from continuing operations
        before income taxes ..................      (1,886,862)      (2,101,418)


Income taxes .................................            --               --

                                                  ------------     ------------
Loss from continuing operations ..............      (1,886,862)      (2,101,418)
                                                  ------------     ------------

Loss from discontinued operations ............        (104,962)        (102,377)

                                                  ------------     ------------
Net loss .....................................    $ (1,991,824)    $ (2,203,795)
                                                  ============     ============

Net Loss Per Share - Basic and Diluted
  - Continuing operations ....................    $      (0.91)    $      (1.24)
  - Discontinued operations ..................           (0.05)           (0.06)
                                                  ------------     ------------
  - Total ....................................    $      (0.96)    $      (1.30)
                                                  ============     ============

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding
   - Basic and Diluted .......................       2,083,954        1,689,558
                                                  ============     ============

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


                                       5
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
                      PATRON SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIENCY) EQUITY
                    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
                                   (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                  SHARES OF      PAR VALUE      SHARES OF      PAR VALUE      SHARES OF       PAR VALUE
                                   SERIES A       SERIES A      SERIES A-1    SERIES A-1        COMMON          COMMON
                                  PREFERRED      PREFERRED      PREFERRED      PREFERRED        STOCK           STOCK
                                    STOCK          STOCK          STOCK          STOCK       (AS RESTATED)   (AS RESTATED)
                                 ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------
<S>                                      <C>    <C>              <C>          <C>               <C>          <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2006 .....           --     $       --             --     $       --        1,978,279    $     19,783

Amortization of deferred
  stock-based compensation ...           --             --             --             --             --              --
Issuance of Series A Preferred
  Stock to investors .........            893              9           --             --             --              --
Issuance of warrants in
  connection with bridge
  loan extension -
  extension warrants .........           --             --             --             --             --              --
Conversion option penalty
  incurred upon default
  of Bridge Financing III ....           --             --             --             --             --              --
Cancellation of Stock
  Repurchase obligation due
  to former officer ..........           --             --             --             --             --              --
Issuance of Series A-1
  Preferred stock in
  settlement of debt .........           --             --       33,420,078        334,201        (98,333)           (983)
Vested portion of stock
  options ....................           --             --             --             --             --              --
Net Loss .....................           --             --             --             --             --              --
                                 ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------

BALANCE MARCH 31, 2006 (AS
   RESTATED) .................            893   $          9     33,420,078   $    334,201      1,879,946    $     18,800
                                 ============   ============   ============   ============   ============    ============



<CAPTION>
                                  ADDITIONAL      COMMON
                                   PAID IN        STOCK                         ACCUMULATED
                                   CAPITAL      REPURCHASE        DEFERRED        DEFICIT           TOTAL
                                 (AS RESTATED)  OBLIGATION      COMPENSATION    (AS RESTATED)   (AS RESTATED)
                                 ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                              <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2006 .....   $ 65,601,276   $ (1,300,000)   $     (7,500)   $(84,388,027)   $(20,074,468)

Amortization of deferred
  stock-based compensation ...           --             --             7,500            --             7,500
Issuance of Series A Preferred
  Stock to investors .........      4,180,441           --              --              --         4,180,450
Issuance of warrants in
  connection with bridge
  loan extension -
  extension warrants .........         48,129           --              --              --            48,129
Conversion option penalty
  incurred upon default
  of Bridge Financing III ....        192,000           --              --              --           192,000
Cancellation of Stock
  Repurchase obligation due
  to former officer ..........      1,300,000      1,300,000            --              --         2,600,000
Issuance of Series A-1
  Preferred stock in
  settlement of debt .........     20,018,670           --              --              --        20,351,888
Vested portion of stock
  options ....................        173,335           --              --              --           173,335
Net Loss .....................           --             --              --        (1,991,824)     (1,991,824)
                                 ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

BALANCE MARCH 31, 2006 (AS
  RESTATED) ..................   $ 91,513,851   $       --      $       --      $(86,379,851)   $  5,487,010
                                 ============   ============    ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


                                       6
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
                      PATRON SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                    --------------------------
                                                                        2006           2005
                                                                   (AS RESTATED)
                                                                    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                                 <C>            <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
  Net loss ......................................................   $(1,991,824)   $(2,203,795)
                                                                    ===========    ===========
  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
  used in operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization ...............................        70,796         19,525
    Accretion related to warrants issued for notes payable ......        20,909        260,965
    Amortization of deferred financing costs ....................       282,129        153,520
    Stock based penalty under financing arrangements ............         2,852        369,000
    Non-cash interest income ....................................          --          (19,250)
    Non-cash increase in interest payable to former stockholder .        48,400           --
    Conversion option in connection with bridge note holders ....       192,000           --
    Stock based compensation ....................................       180,835        508,500
    Gain on issuance of preferred stock in settlement of debt ...      (906,987)          --
    Changes in assets and liabilities:
      Restricted cash escrowed to settle liabilities assumed ....      (957,122)    (1,388,000)
      Prepaid expenses ..........................................          --           10,637
      Accounts receivable .......................................       113,945        (58,518)
      Other current assets ......................................        17,809        110,533
      Accounts payable ..........................................      (268,700)      (325,017)
      Accrued interest ..........................................       429,027         94,827
      Deferred revenue ..........................................      (142,072)        35,283
      Expense reimbursements due to officers and shareholders ...        (7,354)       (94,500)
      Accrued payroll and payroll related expenses ..............      (311,041)       (72,250)
      Loss on sale of fixed assets ..............................           (62)          --
      Other current liabilities .................................      (197,271)        31,439
      Other accrued expenses ....................................          --           (3,413)
                                                                    ===========    ===========
  Total adjustments .............................................    (1,431,907)      (366,719)
                                                                    ===========    ===========
NET CASH USED IN OPERATIONS - CONTINUING OPERATIONS .............    (3,423,731)    (2,570,514)
                                                                    ===========    ===========
NET CASH USED IN OPERATIONS - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS ...........       (31,076)          --
                                                                    -----------    -----------
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES ...........................    (3,454,807)    (2,570,514)
                                                                    -----------    -----------

CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
  Cash payments in purchase business combinations ...............          --         (857,633)
  Cash acquired in purchase business combinations ...............          --          416,397
  Purchase and development of technology ........................      (211,294)          --
  Proceeds from sale of fixed assets ............................         1,755           --
  Purchase of fixed assets ......................................       (12,689)       (32,055)
                                                                    -----------    -----------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES - CONTINUING OPERATIONS ...      (222,228)      (473,291)
                                                                    ===========    ===========
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS .        (3,000)          --
                                                                    -----------    -----------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES ...........................      (225,228)      (473,291)
                                                                    -----------    -----------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  Expenses financed by (repaid to) officers and stockholders ....          --         (225,000)
  Payments on settlement of accommodation agreements ............      (125,000)          --
  Advances from stockholders ....................................          --          500,000
  Deferred financing costs ......................................       (54,000)      (316,579)
  Proceeds from issuance of preferred series A stock ............     4,000,451           --
  Proceeds from issuance of bridge notes ........................          --        3,500,000
  Repayments of advances from shareholders ......................          --          (93,796)
                                                                    -----------    -----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES - CONTINUING OPERATIONS     3,821,451      3,364,625
                                                                    ===========    ===========

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS .......................   $   141,416    $   320,820

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period ..................   $        14    $    45,901
                                                                    -----------    -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period ........................   $   141,430    $   366,721
                                                                    ===========    ===========

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
  Interest ......................................................   $       476    $   214,428

Liabilities and claims settled in exchange for Series A-1
  Preferred Stock ...............................................   $21,258,875
</TABLE>

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


                                       7
<PAGE>


                      PATRON SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
                                 MARCH 31, 2006

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Patron
Systems,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  (the "Company,"  "Patron," "us," or "we") have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim  financial  information  and the  instructions to Form
10-QSB.  Accordingly,  they do not include  all the  information  and  footnotes
required by accounting  principles  generally  accepted in the United States for
complete  financial  statements.  In the opinion of management,  all adjustments
(which include only normal  recurring  adjustments)  necessary to present fairly
the financial  position,  results of  operations  and cash flows for all periods
presented have been made. The results of operations for the  three-month  period
ended March 31, 2006 are not  necessarily  indicative of the  operating  results
that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2006.

On  July  31,  2006,  the  Company  effectuated  a  1-for-30
reverse  stock split of its common  stock  following  the  effectiveness  of the
amendment to its Second Amended and Restated  Certificate of Incorporation which
was approved by  stockholders at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on July
20, 2006. The accompanying  financial  statements give retroactive effect to the
reverse split for all periods presented.

This Form 10-QSB/A should be read in conjunction  with the Company's  10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2005.


NOTE 2 - THE COMPANY

ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Patron Systems, Inc., ("Systems") is a Delaware corporation formed in April 2002
to provide  comprehensive,  end-to-end  information security solutions to global
corporations and government institutions.

Pursuant to an Amended and Restated Share Exchange  Agreement  dated October 11,
2002, Combined  Professional  Services ("CPS"),  Systems and the stockholders of
Systems  consummated a share  exchange  ("Share  Exchange").  As a result of the
Share  Exchange,   the  former  stockholders  of  Systems  became  the  majority
stockholders of CPS. Accordingly,  Systems became the accounting acquirer of CPS
and the exchange was accounted for as a reverse merger and  recapitalization  of
Systems.  CPS  subsequently  merged with  Systems,  with Systems  surviving  the
merger. The combined entity continued to use the name Patron Systems, Inc.


NOTE 3 - RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company, while undergoing the audit of its consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2006, became aware of possible  misstatements in
its unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  during the year ended December 31, 2006. On
March 6, 2007, the Company's Board of Directors  determined that certain amounts
reported in its unaudited condensed  consolidated  interim financial  statements
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, and June 30, 2006, and for the six months
ended June 30,  2006 and nine  months  ended  September  30,  2006  needed to be
restated as described below.

The specific errors that came to management's  attention relate to the Company's
accounting for certain transactions that occurred during the quarter ended March
31, 2006 and the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Upon review of these transactions,
Company  management  discovered  that  the  accounting  for  these  transactions
resulted in a  $2,408,250  overstatement  of its loss for the  quarterly  period
ended March 31, 2006 and a $593,765  overstatement of its loss for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2006,  which also resulted in an overstatement of the year
to date  losses  in the six and nine  month  periods  ended  June  30,  2006 and
September 30, 2006, respectively.


                                       8
<PAGE>


Specifically,  the Company  recorded  for the three months ended March 31, 2006,
(1) a net loss of $858,213 on the  settlement of various  liabilities  under its
creditor  and  claimant  liabilities  restructuring  program when it should have
recorded a net gain of  approximately  $906,987,  (2) recorded  excess  non-cash
interest of $358,000 with respect to a conversion  option that became  effective
under two of its Interim Bridge Financing III notes and (3) charged, as interest
expense,  a $285,050 fee paid to the  placement  agent in its Series A Preferred
stock financing transaction that should have been recorded as a reduction of the
offering  proceeds.  The nature of the adjustments  required in the creditor and
claimant liabilities  restructuring relate to an overvaluation of the Series A-1
preferred   shares  issued  in  the  exchange  offer  offset  by  gains  on  the
extinguishment  of liabilities that originated in connection with obligations to
issue or repurchase stock.

The effect of the  restatement  on the  Company's  previously  issued  unaudited
condensed consolidated interim financial statements is as follows:

                                                          Three Months
                                                              ended
                                                          March 31, 2006
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 As Previously          As
                                                   Reported          Restated
                                                 ------------      ------------

Loss/(Gain) associated with settlement
   agreements ..............................     $    858,213      $   (906,987)

Interest expense ...........................     $ (1,615,514)     $   (972,464)

Net loss from continuing operations ........     $ (4,295,112)     $ (1,886,862)

Net loss available to common stockholders ..     $ (4,400,074)     $ (1,991,824)

Net loss per share-continuing operations ...     $      (2.06)     $      (0.91)

Net loss per share - total .................     $      (2.11)     $      (0.96)

Additional paid in capital .................     $ 93,922,101      $ 91,513,851

Accumulated Deficit ........................     $(88,788,101)     $(86,379,851)

A) For the quarter ended March 31, 2006,  the effect was to reduce the net loss,
accumulated  deficit and  additional  paid in capital by $2,408,250 and net loss
per share by $1.15 per share.


NOTE 4 - LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have been  prepared  assuming that the
Company will  continue as a going  concern.  The Company  incurred a net loss of
$1,991,824  for the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2006,  which  includes  an
aggregate of $109,066 of net non-cash gains including the conversion option cost
for bridge note and subordinated note holders,  non-cash  interest expense,  and
stock based compensation.  The Company used net cash in its operating activities
of  $3,454,807  during the three  months  ended March 31,  2006.  The  Company's
working  capital  deficiency at March 31, 2006  amounted to  $5,659,898  and the
Company is continuing to experience


                                        9
<PAGE>


shortages in working capital.  The Company is also involved in litigation and is
being  investigated  by the Securities and Exchange  Commission  with respect to
certain  of its press  releases  and its use of form S-8 to  register  shares of
common stock issued to certain consultants (Note 16). The Company cannot provide
any assurance that the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse
affect on its ability to sustain the business.  These matters raise  substantial
doubt  about  the  Company's  ability  to  continue  as  a  going  concern.  The
accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company expects to continue  incurring losses for the foreseeable future due
to the  inherent  uncertainty  that is related to  establishing  the  commercial
feasibility of technological  products and developing a presence in new markets.
The Company's ability to successfully market its software products, grow revenue
and generate cash flows of certain businesses it acquired in 2005 is critical to
the  realization of its business  plan.  The Company raised  $4,285,501 of gross
proceeds  ($3,946,451  net  proceeds  after the  payment of certain  transaction
expenses)  in  financing  transactions  during the three  months ended March 31,
2006. The Company used $3,454,807 of these proceeds to fund its operations and a
net of $225,228  in  investing  activities.  On January  12,  2006,  the Company
offered  its  creditors  and  claimants  an  agreement  to  receive  Series  A-1
Convertible  Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Series A-1 Preferred")
for  amounts  owed  to the  holders  of the  Company's  indebtedness  (including
lenders,  past-due trade accounts, and employees,  consultants and other service
providers  with claims for fees,  wages or expenses)  (Note 17). As of March 31,
2006,  Creditors  representing  approximately  $21.4  million  of the  Company's
outstanding  debts,  claims and other  liabilities  accepted  this  proposal  by
signing and returning to the Company the Stock Subscription Agreement and Mutual
Release.  The  Company  is  currently  unable to  determine  whether  all of its
remaining  creditors  will accept its  proposal or that the  acceptance  of such
proposal  will  actually  improve  the  Company's  ability  to fund the  further
development of its business plan or improve its operations.

The  Company is  currently  in the  process of  attempting  to raise  additional
capital and has taken certain steps to conserve its liquidity while it continues
to integrate the businesses  acquired in 2005. Although management believes that
the  Company  has access to capital  resources,  the Company has not secured any
commitments  for additional  financing at this time nor can the Company  provide
any  assurance  that it will be  successful  in its efforts to raise  additional
capital and/or successfully execute its business plan.


NOTE 5 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated  financial  statements  include the accounts of the Company and
its  wholly-owned  subsidiaries,   Entelagent  Software  Corporation,   Complete
Security Solutions,  Inc.,  LucidLine,  Inc. and PILEC Disbursement Company. All
significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated.

CASH

The Company  considers  all highly  liquid  securities  purchased  with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company derives revenues from the following  sources:  (1) sales of computer
software,  which includes new software licenses and software updates and product
support  revenues and (2) services,  which  include  internet  access,  back-up,
retrieval and restoration services and professional consulting services.

The Company  applies the revenue  recognition  principles  set forth under AICPA
Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-2 "Software Revenue Recognition" and Securities
and  Exchange   Commission  Staff  Accounting   Bulletin  ("SAB")  104  "Revenue
Recognition"  with  respect to its  revenue.  Accordingly,  the Company  records
revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has
occurred,   (iii)  the  vendor's  fee  is  fixed  or   determinable,   and  (iv)
collectability is reasonably assured.


                                       10
<PAGE>


The Company  generates  revenues  through sales of software  licenses and annual
support subscription  agreements,  which include access to technical support and
software  updates  (if  and  when  available).  Software  license  revenues  are
generated  from  licensing the rights to use products  directly to end-users and
through third party service providers.

Revenues from software license agreements are generally recognized upon delivery
of software to the customer.  All of the Company's  software sales are supported
by a written  contract or other evidence of sale  transaction such as a customer
purchase order.  These forms of evidence  clearly  indicate the selling price to
the  customer,  shipping  terms,  payment  terms  (generally 30 days) and refund
policy,  if any. The selling  prices of these products are fixed at the time the
sale is consummated.

Revenue from post contract customer support arrangements or undelivered elements
are deferred and  recognized at the time of delivery or over the period in which
the services are performed based on vendor specific  objective  evidence of fair
value for such  undelivered  elements.  Vendor  specific  objective  evidence is
typically  based on the price charged when an element is sold  separately or, if
an element is not sold  separately,  on the price  established  by an authorized
level of management,  if it is probable that the price, once  established,  will
not change  before  market  introduction.  The Company uses the residual  method
prescribed in SOP 98-9,  "Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition
With Respect to Certain  Transaction" to allocate revenues to delivered elements
once it has  established  vendor-specific  objective  evidence of fair value for
such undelivered elements.

The Company provides its internet access and back-up,  retrieval and restoration
services  under  contractual  arrangements  with terms  ranging from 1 year to 5
years.   These  contracts  are  billed  monthly,   in  advance,   based  on  the
contractually  stated  rates.  At the  inception of a contract,  the Company may
activate the customer's account for a contractual fee that it amortizes over the
term of the  contract  in  accordance  with  Emerging  Issues  Task Force  Issue
("EITF") 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." The Company's
standard contracts are automatically renewable by the customer unless terminated
on 30 days written notice.  Early termination of the contract  generally results
in an early  termination fee equal to the lesser of six months of service or the
remaining term of the contract.

Professional  consulting  services  are  billed  based on the number of hours of
consultant   services  provided  and  the  hourly  billing  rates.  The  Company
recognizes revenue under these arrangements as the service is performed.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

In accordance  with business  combination  accounting,  we allocate the purchase
price of acquired  companies  to the tangible and  intangible  assets  acquired,
liabilities  assumed,  as well as in-process  research and development  based on
their estimated fair values.  We engaged a third-party  appraisal firm to assist
management  in  determining  the fair  values of  certain  assets  acquired  and
liabilities  assumed.  Such a valuation requires  management to make significant
estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.

Management makes estimates of fair value based upon  assumptions  believed to be
reasonable.  These estimates are based on historical  experience and information
obtained from the management of the acquired  companies.  Critical  estimates in
valuing certain of the intangible  assets include but are not limited to: future
expected  cash  flows  from  license  sales,  maintenance  agreements,  customer
contracts and acquired  developed  technologies;  expected  costs to develop the
in-process  research and development  into  commercially  viable  products;  the
acquired  company's brand awareness and market position,  as well as assumptions
about the  period of time the  acquired  brand will  continue  to be used in the
combined  company's product  portfolio;  and discount rates. These estimates are
inherently  uncertain  and  unpredictable.  Assumptions  may  be  incomplete  or
inaccurate,  and  unanticipated  events and  circumstances  may occur  which may
affect  the  accuracy  or  validity  of such  assumptions,  estimates  or actual
results.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The  Company  adjusts  its  accounts  receivable  balances  that it  deems to be
uncollectible.  The  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  is the  Company's  best
estimate  of the amount of  probable  credit  losses in the  Company's  existing
accounts receivable.  The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts on
a monthly basis and  determines  the allowance  based on an analysis of its past
due  accounts.  All  past  due  balances  that  are  over 90 days  are  reviewed
individually  for  collectability.  Account balances are charged off against the
allowance  after all means of collection  have been  exhausted and the potential
for recovery is considered remote.


                                       11
<PAGE>


PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and  equipment is stated at cost.  Depreciation  is computed  using the
straight-line  method over the estimated  useful lives of the assets  (generally
three to five  years).  Maintenance  and  repairs  are  charged  to  expense  as
incurred; cost of major additions and betterments are capitalized. When property
and equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation  are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gains or losses
are reflected in the statement of operations in the period of disposal.

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

We   account  for   Goodwill   and   Intangible   Assets  in
accordance with Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards  ("SFAS") No. 141,
"Business  Combinations"  and SFAS  No.  142,  "Goodwill  and  Other  Intangible
Assets." Under SFAS No. 142,  goodwill and  intangibles  that are deemed to have
indefinite  lives are no longer  amortized but,  instead,  are to be reviewed at
least  annually for  impairment.  Application  of the goodwill  impairment  test
requires judgment,  including the  identification of reporting units,  assigning
assets and  liabilities  to  reporting  units,  assigning  goodwill to reporting
units,  and  determining  the fair  value.  Significant  judgments  required  to
estimate the fair value of reporting units include estimating future cash flows,
determining  appropriate discount rates and other assumptions.  Changes in these
estimates and assumptions  could  materially  affect the  determination  of fair
value and/or goodwill  impairment for each reporting unit. The Company  recorded
goodwill in  connection  with the  Company's  acquisitions  described  in Note 6
amounting to $22,440,412.  The Company's  annual  impairment  review of goodwill
resulted in goodwill impairment charges totaling  $12,929,696 for the year ended
December  31, 2005 (Note 6)  resulting  in  $9,510,716  in goodwill at March 31,
2006.

LONG LIVED ASSETS

The Company periodically reviews the carrying values of its long lived assets in
accordance  with SFAS 144,  "Long  Lived  Assets"  when  events  or  changes  in
circumstances would indicate that it is more likely than not that their carrying
values may exceed their  realizable  value and records  impairment  charges when
necessary. The Company's review of the carrying values of its long lived assets,
which principally consist of amortizable  intangibles from acquired  businesses,
resulted in an impairment  charge of $1,705,455  for the year ended December 31,
2005 (Note 9). Amortizable intangible assets continue to be amortized over their
estimated  useful  lives.  The Company  evaluated  the  carrying  amounts of its
goodwill  and  intangible  assets  as of  March  31,  2006 and  determined  that
impairment charges are not necessary.

USE OF ESTIMATES IN PREPARING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In preparing  financial  statements in  conformity  with  accounting  principles
generally  accepted in the United  States of America,  management is required to
make estimates and  assumptions  that affect the reported  amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent  assets and liabilities at the date
of the  financial  statements  and revenue  and  expenses  during the  reporting
period. The Company's significant estimates principally include the valuation of
its  intangible  assets and goodwill  and accrued  liability  for the  Company's
estimate of the fair value of preferred  stock issued upon the settlement of the
creditor and claimant liabilities  restructuring in March 2006 (Note 17). Actual
results could differ from those estimates.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The  carrying  amounts  reported  in  the  balance  sheet  for  cash,   accounts
receivable,  accounts payable accrued  expenses,  advances from stockholders and
all note obligations  classified as current  liabilities  approximate their fair
values  based on the  short-term  maturity of these  instruments.  The  carrying
amounts of the Company's  convertible and subordinated note  obligations,  stock
repurchase  obligation  and common stock subject to put right  approximate  fair
value as such instruments feature contractual interest rates that are consistent
with  current  market  rates  of  interest  or have  effective  yields  that are
consistent with instruments of similar risk, when taken together with any equity
instruments concurrently issued to holders.


                                       12
<PAGE>


PREFERRED STOCK

The Company  applies the guidance  enumerated  in SFAS No. 150  "Accounting  for
Certain  Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics  of both  Liabilities and
Equity"  and EITF Topic  D-98  "Classification  and  Measurement  of  Redeemable
Securities,"  when determining the  classification  and measurement of preferred
stock.  Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified
as liability  instruments and are measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS
150. All other  issuances of preferred  stock are subject to the  classification
and  measurement   principles  of  EITF  Topic  D-98.  Accordingly  the  Company
classifies  conditionally  redeemable  preferred shares (if any), which includes
preferred  shares that  feature  redemption  rights  that are either  within the
control of the holder or subject to redemption  upon the occurrence of uncertain
events not solely  within the Company's  control,  as temporary  equity.  At all
other  times,  the Company  classifies  its  preferred  shares in  stockholders'
equity.

The Company's  preferred shares do not feature any redemption  rights within the
holders  control or  conditional  redemption  features not within the  Company's
control as of March 31, 2006.  Accordingly  all issuances of preferred stock are
presented as a component of stockholders equity.

CONVERTIBLE INSTRUMENTS

The Company  evaluates  and  accounts  for  conversion  options  embedded in its
convertible  instruments  in  accordance  with  SFAS  No.  133  "Accounting  for
Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities"  ("SFAS  133") and EITF 00-19
"Accounting  for Derivative  Financial  Instruments  Indexed to, and Potentially
Settled in, a Company's Own Stock" ("EITF 00-19").

SFAS 133 generally  provides three criteria that, if met,  require  companies to
bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as
free standing  derivative  financial  instruments in accordance with EITF 00-19.
These  three  criteria   include   circumstances   in  which  (a)  the  economic
characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative  instrument are not clearly
and  closely  related  to the  economic  characteristics  and  risks of the host
contract,  (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded  derivative
instrument and the host contract is not remeasured at fair value under otherwise
applicable  generally accepted accounting  principles with changes in fair value
reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate  instrument  with the same
terms as the embedded  derivative  instrument  would be  considered a derivative
instrument subject to the requirements of SFAS 133. SFAS 133 and EITF 00-19 also
provide  an  exception  to this  rule when the host  instrument  is deemed to be
conventional (as that term is described in the  implementation  guidance to SFAS
133 and further clarified in EITF 05-2 "The Meaning of "Conventional Convertible
Debt Instrument" in Issue No. 00-19).

The Company  accounts for convertible  instruments  (when it has determined that
the  embedded  conversion  options  should  not be  bifurcated  from  their host
instruments)  in accordance  with the  provisions of EITF 98-5  "Accounting  for
Convertible  Securities with Beneficial  Conversion Features," ("EITF 98-5") and
EITF  00-27  "Application  of EITF  98-5 to  Certain  Convertible  Instruments."
Accordingly,  the Company records when necessary  discounts to convertible notes
for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based
upon the  differences  between the fair value of the underlying  common stock at
the commitment date of the note  transaction and the effective  conversion price
embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over
the term of the related debt to their earliest date of  redemption.  The Company
also  records  when  necessary  deemed  dividends  for the  intrinsic  value  of
conversion  options  embedded in  preferred  shares  based upon the  differences
between the fair value of the underlying  common stock at the commitment date of
the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note.

The  Company  evaluated  the  conversion  option  embedded  in  its  convertible
instruments  during each of the reporting  periods presented and has determined,
in accordance with the provisions of these statements, that it does not meet the
criteria requiring bifurcation of these instruments.

The  Company  determined  that the  conversion  option  embedded in its Series A
Convertible  Preferred  Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Series A Preferred"),
is not a free standing derivative in accordance with the implementation guidance
provided in paragraph 61 (l) of Appendix A to SFAS 133.


                                       13
<PAGE>

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for employee stock  transactions
in  accordance  with  Accounting   Principles   Board  ("APB")  Opinion  No.  25
"Accounting  for Stock Issued to  Employees."  The Company  applied the proforma
disclosure   requirements   of  SFAS  No.  123   "Accounting   for   Stock-Based
Compensation."

Effective  January 1, 2006,  the Company  adopted  SFAS No.  123R  "Share  Based
Payment". This statement is a revision of SFAS Statement No. 123, and supersedes
APB Opinion No. 25, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123R addresses
all forms of share based payment  ("SBP") awards  including  shares issued under
employee  stock  purchase  plans,  stock  options,  restricted  stock  and stock
appreciation  rights.  Under SFAS 123R, SBP awards result in a cost that will be
measured at fair value on the awards' grant date,  based on the estimated number
of awards that are expected to vest that will result in a charge to  operations.
Consequently  during  the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2006,  the  Company
recognized  $180,835  in  expenses,  which  represents  the fair  value of stock
options that have vested during the period ended March 31, 2006.

For the three months ended March 31, 2005,  the Company  applied APB Opinion No.
25,  "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." As required under SFAS No. 148,
"Accounting  for  Stock-based  Compensation  - Transition and  Disclosure,"  the
following table presents pro-forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per
share as if the fair  value-based  method had been applied to all awards  during
that period.

                                                                    THREE MONTHS
                                                                        ENDED
                                                                      MARCH 31,
                                                                        2005
                                                                    -----------
Net Loss ......................................................     $(2,203,795)
Stock-based employee compensation cost, under fair
   value accounting ...........................................        (185,278)
                                                                    -----------
Pro-forma net loss under Fair Value Method ....................     $(2,389,073)
                                                                    -----------

Loss per share
   Basic and Diluted ..........................................     $     (1.30)

Per share stock-based employee compensation cost, under
   fair value accounting
Pro-forma loss per share, Basic and Diluted ...................     $     (1.41)


COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS

The Company  accounts for the issuance of common stock purchase  warrants issued
with  registration  rights in  accordance  with the  provisions  of EITF  00-19,
"Accounting  for Derivative  Financial  Instruments  Indexed to, and Potentially
Settled in, a Company's Own Stock."

Based on the  provisions  of EITF 00-19,  the Company  classifies  as equity any
contracts that (i) require physical  settlement or net-share  settlement or (ii)
gives the  company a choice of  net-cash  settlement  or  settlement  in its own
shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).  The Company classifies as
assets  or  liabilities  any  contracts  that (i)  require  net-cash  settlement
(including a requirement  to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and
if  that  event  is  outside  the  control  of the  company)  or (ii)  give  the
counterparty a choice of net-cash  settlement or settlement in shares  (physical
settlement or net-share settlement).

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes".  SFAS No.  109  requires  the  recognition  of  deferred  tax assets and
liabilities  for both the expected  impact of differences  between the financial
statements and tax basis of assets and  liabilities  and for the expected future
tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry forwards.  SFAS No.
109 additionally  requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect
the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets.


                                       14
<PAGE>


NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic  net loss  per  common  share  is  computed  by  dividing  net loss by the
weighted-average  number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
net loss per common share also  includes  common stock  equivalents  outstanding
during  the  period if  dilutive.  Diluted  net loss per  common  share has been
computed by dividing net loss by the  weighted-average  number of common  shares
outstanding  without an assumed increase in common shares outstanding for common
stock equivalents; as such common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive.

As a result of the  consummation of the Share Exchange  described in Note 1, the
Company  included  40,001  stock  options with an exercise  price of $0.30 per
share that it issued to certain  employees  during  2002 in its  calculation  of
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for all periods presented.

Net loss per common share excludes the following  outstanding options,  warrants
and preferred stock as their effect would be anti-dilutive:

                                                     MARCH 31,
                                           ----------------------------
                                               2006             2005
                                           -----------       ----------
         Options ....................          438,090          197,505
         Warrants ...................        1,289,909          155,501
         Series A Preferred Stock ...        1,860,650             --
         Series A-1 Preferred Stock .       11,140,063             --
                                           -----------       ----------
                                            14,728,712          353,006
                                           ===========       ==========

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December  2004,  the FASB issued SFAS No.  153,  "Exchanges  of  Non-monetary
Assets"  (SFAS  153).  SFAS 153  amends  APB  Opinion  No. 29 to  eliminate  the
exception for non-monetary  exchanges of similar  productive assets and replaces
it with a general  exception  for exchanges of  non-monetary  assets that do not
have commercial  substance.  A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if
the future cash flows of the entity are  expected to change  significantly  as a
result  of  the  exchange.   The  provisions  of  SFAS  153  are  effective  for
non-monetary  asset exchanges  occurring in fiscal periods  beginning after June
15, 2005.  Earlier  application is permitted for  non-monetary  asset  exchanges
occurring in fiscal periods beginning after December 16, 2004. The provisions of
this  statement  are  intended be applied  prospectively.  The  adoption of this
pronouncement  did  not  have  a  material  effect  on the  Company's  financial
statements.

EITF Issue No. 04-8,  "The Effect of  Contingently  Convertible  Instruments  on
Diluted  Earnings per Share" reached a consensus that  contingently  convertible
instruments,  such as contingently  convertible debt,  contingently  convertible
preferred  stock,  and other  such  securities  should be  included  in  diluted
earnings per share (if dilutive)  regardless of whether the market price trigger
has been met. The consensus became effective for reporting  periods ending after
December 15, 2004.  The adoption of this  pronouncement  did not have a material
effect on the Company's financial statements.

In May 2005, the Financial  Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No.  154,  "Accounting  Changes  and Error
Corrections-a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" ("SFAS
154"). This Statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes,  and FASB
Statement No. 3, Reporting  Accounting Changes in Interim Financial  Statements,
and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in
accounting  principle.  This  Statement  applies  to all  voluntary  changes  in
accounting  principle.  It also  applies to changes  required  by an  accounting
pronouncement  in the unusual instance that the  pronouncement  does not include
specific  transition   provisions.   When  a  pronouncement   includes  specific
transition provisions, those provisions should be followed.


                                       15
<PAGE>


APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting
principle be  recognized  by including in net income of the period of the change
the  cumulative  effect  of  changing  to the  new  accounting  principle.  This
Statement  requires  retrospective   application  to  prior  periods'  financial
statements of changes in accounting  principle,  unless it is  impracticable  to
determine  either the  period-specific  effects or the cumulative  effect of the
change. When it is impracticable to determine the period-specific  effects of an
accounting  change  on one or more  individual  prior  periods  presented,  this
Statement requires that the new accounting  principle be applied to the balances
of assets and  liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest  period for which
retrospective  application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be
made  to  the  opening  balance  of  retained  earnings  (or  other  appropriate
components of equity or net assets in the  statement of financial  position) for
that  period  rather  than being  reported  in an income  statement.  When it is
impracticable  to  determine  the  cumulative  effect  of  applying  a change in
accounting principle to all prior periods,  this Statement requires that the new
accounting  principle  be applied as if it were adopted  prospectively  from the
earliest date  practicable.  This Statement is effective for accounting  changes
and  corrections  of errors made in fiscal years  beginning  after  December 15,
2005. The adoption of this  pronouncement  did not have a material effect on the
Company's financial statements.

On  June  29,  2005,  the  EITF  ratified  Issue  No.  05-2,   "The  Meaning  of
`Conventional  Convertible Debt Instrument' in EITF Issue No. 00-19, `Accounting
for Derivative  Financial  Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a
Company's Own Stock.'" EITF Issue 05-2 provides guidance on determining  whether
a convertible debt instrument is  "conventional"  for the purpose of determining
when an issuer is required to bifurcate a conversion  option that is embedded in
convertible  debt in accordance  with SFAS 133.  Issue No. 05-2 is effective for
new  instruments  entered into and  instruments  modified in  reporting  periods
beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a
material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In September 2005, the EITF ratified Issue No. 05-4, "The Effect of a Liquidated
Damages Clause on a Freestanding  Financial Instrument Subject to EITF Issue No.
00-19,   `Accounting  for  Derivative  Financial  Instruments  Indexed  to,  and
Potentially  Settled in, a Company's Own Stock.'" EITF 05-4 provides guidance to
issuers as to how to account for registration  rights agreements that require an
issuer to use its "best efforts" to file a registration statement for the resale
of equity  instruments and have it declared  effective by the end of a specified
grace period and, if applicable,  maintain the effectiveness of the registration
statement  for a  period  of  time or pay a  liquidated  damage  penalty  to the
investor.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the effect that
the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its financial statements.

In September 2005, the FASB ratified the Emerging  Issues Task Force's  ("EITF")
Issue No. 05-7,  "Accounting for Modifications to Conversion Options Embedded in
Debt Instruments and Related Issues," which addresses  whether a modification to
a  conversion  option that  changes its fair value  affects the  recognition  of
interest  expense for the associated debt instrument  after the modification and
whether a borrower should recognize a beneficial  conversion feature, not a debt
extinguishment if a debt modification  increases the intrinsic value of the debt
(for example,  the modification  reduces the conversion price of the debt). This
issue is effective for future modifications of debt instruments beginning in the
first interim or annual  reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The
adoption of this  pronouncement  did not have a material effect on the Company's
financial statements.

In September 2005, the FASB also ratified the EITF's Issue No. 05-8, "Income Tax
Consequences of Issuing Convertible Debt with a Beneficial  Conversion Feature,"
which  discusses  whether the  issuance of  convertible  debt with a  beneficial
conversion  feature  results in a basis  difference  arising from the  intrinsic
value of the  beneficial  conversion  feature on the  commitment  date (which is
recorded in the stockholders'  equity for book purposes,  but as a liability for
income tax purposes),  and, if so, whether that basis  difference is a temporary
difference  under FASB  Statement No. 109,  "Accounting  for Income Taxes." This
Issue should be applied by retrospective  application  pursuant to Statement 154
to all  instruments  with a beneficial  conversion  feature  accounted for under
Issue 00-27  included in financial  statements for reporting  periods  beginning
after  December 15,  2005.  The  adoption of this  pronouncement  did not have a
material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,  "Accounting  for Certain Hybrid
Financial  Instruments - an amendment of FASB  Statements No. 133 and 150." SFAS
No. 155 (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument
that contains an embedded  derivative that otherwise would require  bifurcation,
(b) clarifies that certain  instruments  are not subject to the  requirements of
SFAS 133, (c)  establishes a requirement  to evaluate  interests in  securitized
financial assets to identify  interests that may contain an embedded  derivative


                                       16
<PAGE>



requiring  bifurcation,  (d) clarifies  what may be an embedded  derivative  for
certain  concentrations  of credit  risk and (e)  amends  SFAS 140 to  eliminate
certain  prohibitions  related to  derivatives  on a qualifying  special-purpose
entity.  SFAS 155 is  applicable  to new or modified  financial  instruments  in
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006,  though the provisions  related
to fair value accounting for hybrid financial instruments can also be applied to
existing instruments.  Early adoption, as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal
year, is also permitted, provided interim financial statements have not yet been
issued.  We are  currently  evaluating  the potential  impact,  if any, that the
adoption of SFAS 155 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006,  the FASB issued  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards
("SFAS") No. 156,  Accounting for Servicing of Financial  Assets (SFAS No. 156).
SFAS No. 156 amends SFAS No. 140,  "Accounting  for  Transfers  and Servicing of
Financial Assets and  Extinguishments of Liabilities," to require all separately
recognized  servicing assets and servicing  liabilities to be initially measured
at  fair  value,  if  practicable.  SFAS  No.  156  also  permits  servicers  to
subsequently  measure each separate class of servicing assets and liabilities at
fair value rather than at the lower of cost or market.  For those companies that
elect to measure their servicing assets and liabilities at fair value,  SFAS No.
156 requires  the  difference  between the carrying  value and fair value at the
date of adoption to be recognized as a cumulative  effect adjustment to retained
earnings as of the  beginning  of the fiscal year in which the election is made.
SFAS No. 156 is effective for the first fiscal year  beginning  after  September
15, 2006. We are currently  evaluating  the potential  impact,  if any, that the
adoption of SFAS 156 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Other  accounting  standards  that have been  issued or  proposed by the FASB or
other standards-setting  bodies that do not require adoption until a future date
are not  expected  to  have a  material  impact  on the  consolidated  financial
statements upon adoption.


NOTE 6 - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On February 25, 2005, the Company acquired  Complete  Security  Solutions,  Inc.
("CSSI") and LucidLine,  Inc.  ("LucidLine")  in separate  merger  transactions.
Additionally,  on March 30, 2005, the Company acquired Entelagent Software Corp.
("Entelagent") in a merger transaction. The Company accounted for these business
combinations  in  accordance  with the  provisions of SFAS 141  "Accounting  for
Business Combinations."

In connection with these three merger  transactions,  the Company paid, $200,000
in cash, 496,667 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $12,665,000,
subordinated  promissory notes in the aggregate  principal amount of $4,500,000,
warrants to purchase  up to 75,000  shares of common  stock which were valued at
$1,912,500.   Direct  expenses   incurred  by  the  Company  to  complete  these
transactions  amounted  to  $912,663.  The  total  purchase  price for the three
companies amounted to $20,190,133.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    CSSI       LUCIDLINE     ENTELAGENT       TOTAL
                                -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                             <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Cash ........................   $      --     $   200,000   $      --     $   200,000
Common Stock ................     6,375,000     3,740,000     2,550,000    12,665,000
Subordinated promissory notes     4,500,000          --            --       4,500,000
Common stock warrants .......     1,912,500          --            --       1,912,500
Transaction expenses ........       398,128       154,611       359,894       912,633
                                -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
   Total Purchase Price .....   $13,185,628   $ 4,094,611   $ 2,909,894   $20,190,133
                                ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


The allocation of the purchase price was based upon a valuation  study performed
by an independent outside appraisal firm. The purchase price allocation resulted
in the allocation of $3,101,000 to intangible  assets,  including  $2,570,000 to
developed  technology  and  $190,000 to  in-process  research  and  development.
Additionally,  the  purchase  price  allocation  resulted in the  allocation  of
$22,440,412 to goodwill.


                                       17
<PAGE>


The Company  performed its annual  impairment test of goodwill at its designated
valuation date of December 31, 2005 in accordance  with SFAS 142. As a result of
these tests, the Company determined that the recoverable amount of goodwill with
respect  to its  business  amounted  to  $9,510,716.  Accordingly,  the  Company
recorded a goodwill  impairment charge in the amount of $12,929,696 for the year
ended  December  31,  2005.  Additionally,   after  reevaluating  the  resources
available to the Company, the strategic direction of the business as well as the
revised  business  plans and  financial  projections,  the  Company,  during the
quarter ended December 31, 2005, recorded a $1,705,455 charge for the impairment
of  the  developed  technology  assets  acquired  in  the  CSSI  and  Entelagent
acquisitions.  The  remaining  amount  of  goodwill  and  intangible  assets  is
presented net of such impairment charges recorded during the year ended December
31, 2005.


NOTE 7 - OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Other current assets consist of the following:

                                                              MARCH 31
                                                                2006
                                                             ----------
         Employee receivables ...........................    $   75,877
         Prepaid expenses ...............................        36,443
         Deposits .......................................        23,739
                                                             ----------
           Other current assets .........................    $  135,059
                                                             ==========



NOTE 8 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

                                                              MARCH 31
                                                                2006
                                                             ----------
         Computers ......................................   $  107,897
         Furniture and Fixtures .........................       32,887
         Leasehold improvements .........................        4,490
                                                            ----------
             sub-total ..................................      145,274
         less: accumulated depreciation .................      (43,730)
                                                            ----------
             Property and equipment, net ................   $  101,544
                                                            ==========

Depreciation expense amounted to $20,664 and $295 for the three months March 31,
2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively.


NOTE 9 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The  components of  intangible  assets as of March 31, 2006 are set forth in the
following table:

                                                             MARCH 31,
                                                               2006
                                                           -----------
         Developed technology .......................      $ 2,570,000
         Customer relationships .....................          180,000
         Trademarks and tradenames ..................          161,000
         In-process research and development ........          735,681
                                                           -----------
                                                             3,646,681
         Amortization and impairment charge .........       (2,260,964)
                                                           -----------
            Intangible assets, net ..................      $ 1,385,717
                                                           ===========


                                       18
<PAGE>


During the year ended  December  31,  2005,  the Company  recorded a  $1,705,455
charge for the  impairment of the developed  technology  assets  acquired in the
CSSI and Entelagent acquisitions (Note 6).

The Company  classifies  amortization of developed  technology as a component of
cost of sales and  amortization  of customer  relationship  and  trademarks  and
tradenames as a component of general and  administrative  expense.  Amortization
expense amounted to $58,336 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, including
$27,522 classified in cost of sales.


NOTE 10 - DEMAND NOTES PAYABLE

Through  December 31, 2004, the Company borrowed an aggregate amount of $695,000
from several unrelated  parties.  At March 31, 2006, the outstanding  balance on
these  notes  amounted to  $135,000.  These notes are payable on demand and bear
interest at the rate of 10% per annum.  Interest expense on these notes amounted
to  $17,375  for each of the  three  months  ended  March  31,  2006  and  2005,
respectively.

Other demand  notes at March 31, 2006 total  $336,056 and include a note payable
to Lok  Technology  in the amount of $312,556  which is secured by  Entelagent's
accounts receivable and bears interest at 15% per annum. Interest on these other
demand  notes  amounted to $13,433 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
$0 for the three months ended March 30, 2005.

As of March 31,  2006,  $585,000 of the Demand  Notes have been  surrendered  as
payment for Series A-1  Preferred  stock as part of the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities  restructuring  (Note 17). Subsequent to March 31, 2006, $169,212 of
the Demand Notes have been surrendered as payment for Series A-1 Preferred stock
as part of the creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring (Note 17).


NOTE 11 - BRIDGE NOTES PAYABLE

INTERIM BRIDGE FINANCING I

On February 28, 2005, the Company completed a $3,500,000 financing (the "Interim
Bridge Financing I") through the issuance of 10% Senior  Convertible  Promissory
Notes (the "Bridge I Notes") and warrants to purchase up to 58,334 shares of the
Company's  common stock  ("Bridge I  Warrants").  The warrants  have a term of 5
years and an exercise price of $21.00 per share. The aggregate fair value of the
Bridge I Warrants amounts to $1,487,500.  Prior to final maturity,  the Bridge I
Notes may be  converted  into  securities  that would be  issuable  at the first
closing of a subsequent  financing  by the  Company,  for such number of offered
securities that could be purchased for the principal amount being converted. The
Bridge I Notes  had an  initial  term of 120 days  (due on June 28,  2005)  with
interest at a  contractual  rate of 10% per annum and featured an option for the
Company to extend the term for an additional 60 days to August 27, 2005.

In accordance with APB 14, "Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with
Stock Purchase  Warrants," the Company  allocated  $2,456,140 of the proceeds to
the Bridge I Notes and  $1,043,860  of proceeds  to the Bridge I  Warrants.  The
difference  between  the  carrying  amount  of the  Bridge  I  Notes  and  their
contractual redemption amount was accreted as interest expense to June 28, 2005,
their earliest date of redemption.

On June 28, 2005, the Company elected to extend the contractual maturity date of
the Bridge I Notes for an  additional  60 days to August 27, 2005,  which caused
the  contractual  interest rate to increase to 12% per annum.  In addition,  the
Company was  required to issue the 58,334  additional  warrants  (the  "Bridge I
Extension  Warrants") to purchase such number of shares of common stock equal to
1/60 of a share for each $1.00 of  principal  amount  outstanding.  The Bridge I
Extension  Warrants  have a term of 5 years and an exercise  price of $21.00 per
share.  The  Bridge  I  Extension  Warrants  have  a  fair  value  of  $822,500.
Assumptions  relating  to the  estimated  fair  value of these  warrants  are as
follows: fair value of common stock of $19.50; risk-free interest rate of 4.25%;
expected dividend yield zero percent;  expected warrant life of three years; and
current volatility of 125%.


                                       19
<PAGE>


The  Company  did not redeem the  Bridge I Notes on August  27,  2005 and,  as a
result, the notes became  automatically  convertible into 0.128 shares of common
stock for each $1 of principal then  outstanding in accordance with the original
note agreement. Accordingly, the Company recorded a charge of $3,500,000 in 2005
based  upon  the  intrinsic  value of this  conversion  option  measured  at the
original  issuance date of the note in accordance  with EITF 00-27.  The Company
has agreed to file with the SEC, a registration  statement for the resale of the
restricted  shares of the Company's  common stock  issuable upon exercise of the
conversion  option that would be issued in this  transaction,  on a best efforts
basis.

Contractual  interest  expense on the Bridge I Notes  amounted to  $103,562  and
$29,167 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is
included as a component  of interest  expense in the  accompanying  statement of
operations.

As of March 31, 2006,  $3,155,025 of the Bridge I Notes have been surrendered as
payment for Series A-1  Preferred  stock as part of the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities restructuring (Note 17).

INTERIM BRIDGE FINANCING II

On June 6, 2005,  the Company  completed a $2,543,000  financing  (the  "Interim
Bridge  Financing  II")  through  the  issuance  of (i) 10%  Junior  Convertible
Promissory  Notes (the  "Bridge II Notes")  and (ii)  warrants to purchase up to
42,384  shares of common stock (the "Bridge II  Warrants").  The warrants have a
term of 5 years and an exercise  price of $18.00 per share.  The aggregate  fair
value of the Bridge II Warrants  amounts to  $673,895.  Prior to  maturity,  the
Junior Convertible Promissory Notes may be converted into the securities offered
by the Company at the first  closing of a subsequent  financing for the Company,
for such number of offered  securities  as could be purchased  for the principal
amount being converted.

In accordance with APB 14, the Company  allocated  $2,010,277 of the proceeds to
the Bridge II Notes and  $532,723  of proceeds  to the Bridge II  Warrants.  The
difference  between  the  carrying  amount  of the  Bridge  II Notes  and  their
contractual  redemption  amount is being accreted as interest expense to October
3, 2005, their earliest date of redemption.

The  Bridge II Notes  have an  initial  term of 120 days (due on  various  dates
beginning  October 3, 2005) with interest at 10% per annum and feature an option
for the Company to extend the term for an  additional  60 days to various  dates
beginning  December 2, 2005.  Upon the  extension  of the  maturity  date of the
Bridge II Notes, the contractual  interest rate would increase to 12% per annum,
and the Company  would be required to issue  warrants  (the "Bridge II Extension
Warrants") to purchase such number of shares of the Company's common stock equal
to 1/60 of a share for each $1.00 of principal then  outstanding.  The Bridge II
Extension  Warrants  issuable upon  extension of the maturity date of the Junior
Convertible  Promissory notes feature a term of 5 years and an exercise price of
$18.00 per share. The Bridge II Extension Warrants have a fair value of $65,388.
Assumptions  relating  to the  estimated  fair  value of these  warrants  are as
follows:  fair value of common stock $2.40;  risk-free  interest  rate of 3.10%;
expected  dividend yield zero percent;  expected warrant life of five years; and
current volatility of 125%. In addition,  if the Bridge II Notes are not paid in
full on or before the extended maturity date, each note becomes convertible into
0.128 shares of the  Company's  common  stock for each $1.00 of  principal  then
outstanding.  The  intrinsic  value of this  conversion  option  measured at the
issuance  date of the notes  amounts to  $2,543,000  and would be  recognized as
interest  expense in accordance with EITF 00-27.  The Company has agreed to file
with the SEC, a registration  statement for the resale of the restricted  shares
of its common stock issuable upon exercise of the  conversion  option that would
be issuable in this transaction, on a best efforts basis.

The Company sold these  securities to seven accredited  investors  introduced by
Laidlaw,  placement  agent in the  Interim  Bridge  Financing  II.  The  Company
incurred  $386,027 of fees in connection with this transaction  including a cash
fee of $305,160  and  $80,867  for the fair value of warrants to purchase  5,086
shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $18.00 per share.

The Company  elected to extend the due dates of these notes by an  additional 60
days to various dates beginning December 2, 2005.


                                       20
<PAGE>


Contractual  interest expense on the Bridge II Notes amounted to $75,245 for the
three  months  ended March 31,  2006 and is included as a component  of interest
expense in the accompanying statement of operations.

As of March 31, 2006, $1,343,000 of the Bridge II Notes have been surrendered as
payment for Series A-1  Preferred  stock as part of the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities restructuring (Note 17).

INTERIM BRIDGE FINANCING III

Beginning on July 1, 2005, and continuing through December 31, 2005, the Company
completed,  through 12 separate fundings,  a $5,234,000  financing (the "Interim
Bridge  Financing  III")  through  the  issuance  of (i) 10% Junior  Convertible
Promissory  Notes (the  "Bridge III Notes") and (ii)  warrants to purchase up to
87,234 shares of common stock (the "Bridge III  Warrants").  The warrants have a
term of 5 years and an exercise  price of $18.00 per share.  Prior to  maturity,
the Junior  Convertible  Promissory  Notes may be converted  into the securities
offered by the Company at the first  closing of a subsequent  financing  for the
Company,  for such number of offered  securities  as could be purchased  for the
principal amount being converted.

In accordance with APB 14, the Company  allocated  $4,645,544 of the proceeds to
the Bridge III Notes and  $587,595 of proceeds to the Bridge III  Warrants.  The
difference  between  the  carrying  amount  of the  Bridge  III  Notes and their
contractual  redemption  amount is being accreted as interest expense to various
dates from November 1, 2005, their earliest date of redemption. Accretion of the
aforementioned discount amounted to $20,909 for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and is  included as a component  of  interest  expense in the  accompanying
statement of operations.

The  Bridge III Notes  have an  initial  term of 120 days (due on various  dates
beginning October 28, 2005) with interest at 10% per annum and feature an option
for the Company to extend the term for an  additional  60 days to various  dates
beginning  December 28,  2005.  Upon the  extension of the maturity  date of the
Bridge III Notes, the contractual interest rate would increase to 12% per annum,
and the Company  would be required to issue  warrants (the "Bridge III Extension
Warrants") to purchase such number of shares of the Company's common stock equal
to 1/60 of a share for each $1.00 of principal then outstanding.  The Bridge III
Extension  Warrants  issuable upon  extension of the maturity date of the Junior
Convertible  Promissory Notes feature a term of 5 years and an exercise price of
$18.00 per share.  In addition,  if the Bridge III Notes are not paid in full on
or before the extended  maturity date, each note becomes  convertible into 0.128
shares  of  the  Company's  common  stock  for  each  $1.00  of  principal  then
outstanding.  The  intrinsic  value of this  conversion  option  measured at the
issuance  date of the notes  amounts to  $5,234,000  and would be  recognized as
interest  expense in accordance with EITF 00-27.  The Company has agreed to file
with the SEC, a registration  statement for the resale of the restricted  shares
of its common stock issuable upon exercise of the  conversion  option that would
be issuable in this transaction, on a best efforts basis.

Beginning on October 29,  2005,  the Company  elected to extend the  contractual
maturity  date of the  various  Bridge  III Notes for an  additional  60 days to
various dates beginning December 28, 2005, which caused the contractual interest
rate to increase  to 12% per annum.  In  addition,  during the three month ended
March 31, 2006,  the Company was required to issue  39,917  additional  warrants
(the "Bridge III Extension Warrants"). The aggregate fair value of the warrants,
which  amounted to $48,129 was  recorded  as a deferred  financing  cost and was
being  amortized over the 60-day  extension  period or until March 27, 2006 when
the Bridge III Notes were  surrendered  as payment for the Series A-1  Preferred
stock under the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring The Bridge III
Extension  Warrants  have a term of 5 years and an exercise  price of $18.00 per
share. Assumptions relating to the estimated fair value of these warrants are as
follows:  fair value of common stock $1.95 to $2.40;  risk-free interest rate of
3.10% to 3.44%;  expected dividend yield zero percent;  expected warrant life of
three years; and current volatility of 125%.

The Company did not redeem the Bridge III Notes  beginning  on December 28, 2005
and, as a result, the notes became  automatically  convertible into 0.128 shares
of common stock for each $1 of principal then outstanding in accordance with the
original  note  agreement.  This amounts to a total of 70,400  shares during the
three months ended of March 31, 2006. Accordingly, the Company recorded a charge
of $192,000,  in the three months ended March 31, 2006, based upon the intrinsic
value of this conversion  option  measured at the original  issuance date of the
notes in accordance with EITF 00-27.  With the surrender of the Bridge III Notes
in payment  for Series A-1  Preferred  stock  under the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities  restructuring,  these conversion  options are no longer exercisable
and have been cancelled.


                                       21
<PAGE>


Contractual  interest  expense on the Bridge III Notes  amounted to $144,036 for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and is included as a component of interest
expense in the accompanying statement of operations.

The Company sold these securities to Apex, Northwestern,  and Advanced Equities.
Funding  for the Bridge III Notes  included  the  conversion  of  $1,650,000  of
stockholder advances made during the period March 30, 2005 to June 30, 2005 into
Bridge III Notes.

As of March 31,  2006,  all of the  Bridge III Notes  have been  surrendered  as
payment for Series A-1  Preferred  stock as part of the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities restructuring (Note 17).

2006 BRIDGE NOTES

On January 18, 2006, the Company completed a financing of approximately $540,000
in  additional  gross  funds (the "2006  Bridge  Note  Financing")  through  the
issuance of Subordinated  Convertible Promissory Notes (the "2006 Bridge Notes")
in the amount of  $720,001.  The 2006 Bridge Note  agreement  provided for these
notes to automatically convert into the same securities (consisting of shares of
Series A Preferred stock and warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common
stock)  offered  by the  Company  in  connection  with its  Series  A  Preferred
Financing.  On March 27,  2006 (the date of the first  closing  of the  Series A
Preferred Financing), the 2006 Bridge Notes were converted into 7.2 Units in the
Series A Preferred  Financing  described below. The $180,000  difference between
the gross  proceeds  received  upon the  original  issuance of the notes and the
redemption  amount was recorded as an original  issuance discount that was fully
expensed during the three months ended March 31, 2006.

Additionally,  the  Company  paid  Laidlaw & Company  (UK)  Ltd.  (Laidlaw),  as
placement  agent in the  transaction,  a fee of $54,000 in conjunction  with the
2006 Bridge Note  Financing . This fee was fully  amortized  and  recognized  as
interest expense during the three months ending March 31, 2006.


NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS DUE TO OFFICERS AND STOCKHOLDERS

Certain  stockholders  and  officers  of the Company  have paid  expenses on the
Company's behalf since its inception,  of which $166,183 remains  outstanding at
March 31, 2006. The amounts payable to such officers and stockholders are due on
demand.  The balance due under these arrangements is included in the liabilities
that the  Company  has  offered  to  settle  under  the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities  restructuring  described in Note 17.  Subsequent to March 31, 2006,
$13,501 of this amount has been  surrendered as payment for Series A-1 Preferred
stock under the creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring.

NOTES PAYABLE TO OFFICERS AND STOCKHOLDERS

Notes  payable to  officers  and  stockholders  which  amount to  $235,712  bear
interest at 10% per annum and are due on demand. Interest expense on these notes
amounted to $4,725 for the three months  ended March 31,  2006.  The balance due
under these notes is included in the liabilities that the Company has offered to
settle under the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring  described in
Note 17.

CONSULTING AGREEMENT PAYABLE

On June 8, 2005,  the Company  negotiated  a  settlement  regarding a consulting
agreement  payable with a related party.  The terms of the settlement  agreement
terminated the prior agreement and reduced the remaining  payments due under the
contract  to  $150,000  including  a  $50,000  payment  that was  made  upon the
execution of the agreement and two additional  $50,000 payments including one to
be made upon the completion of a follow-on-financing  by the Company and one not
later than September 30, 2005.  The $150,000  reduction in payments was recorded
as a reduction of general and  administrative  expense  during the quarter ended
June 30, 2005.  Additionally,  the settlement agreement terminated an obligation
for the Company to issue 3,334 shares of unrestricted  stock. The stock issuable


                                       22
<PAGE>


under this  commitment  was  recorded in 2004 as common  stock issued in lieu of
cash for services in the amount of $78,900. The rescission of the stock issuable
under this arrangement resulted in an additional reduction of $78,900 in general
and administrative expenses during the year ended December, 31, 2005.

The payment due on September 30, 2005 was not made by the Company.  The $100,000
balance due under this  arrangement  has been  surrendered as payment for Series
A-1 Preferred  stock under the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring
described in Note 17.

NOTES PAYABLE (TO CREDITORS OF ACQUIRED BUSINESS)

The  notes  issued to  creditors  of  Entelagent  described  in Note 6,  include
$1,538,129  payable to related parties for settlement of accrued payroll,  notes
payable and expense reimbursements at March 31, 2006. Aggregate interest expense
on these notes  amounted to $51,111 and $0 for the three  months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005,  respectively.  The  balance due under these notes is included in
the  liabilities  that the Company has offered to settle  under the creditor and
claimant liabilities restructuring described in Note 17.

During the three months ended March 31, 2006,  $812,002 of the notes  payable to
creditors  of  acquired  business  was  surrendered  as  payment  for Series A-1
Preferred  stock under the  creditor  and  claimant  liabilities  restructuring.
Subsequent  to March 31, 2006, an additional  $983,928 has been  surrendered  as
payment  for  Series  A-1  Preferred  stock  under  the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities restructuring.


NOTE 13 - OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other current  liabilities  principally  consists of $445,778 of accrued payroll
and sales tax  liabilities  and estimated  penalties that the Company assumed in
its acquisition of Entelagent (Note 6).


NOTE 14 - DEFERRED REVENUE

Deferred  revenue at March 31, 2006  includes  (1) $87,781 for the fair value of
remaining  service  obligations  on  maintenance  and support  contracts and (2)
$102,228  for  contracts  on which the revenue  recognition  is  deferred  until
contract deliverables have been completed.


NOTE 15 - ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT

In November 2002, the Company entered into a financing  arrangement with a third
party financial institution (the "Lender"),  pursuant to which the Company would
borrow $950,000 under a note to be collateralized by the pledge of 31,667 shares
of registered  stock from five different  stockholders.  In connection with this
arrangement,  the Company  executed a series of  Accommodation  Agreements  with
these stockholders  wherein each stockholder  pledged their shares in return for
the right to receive on or before  November  17,  2003 the return of the pledged
shares,  or replacement  shares in the event of foreclosure,  and one additional
share of common stock for every four shares pledged as compensation. The Company
also  agreed  to use  "best  efforts"  to  register  these  shares  with  the US
Securities and Exchange Commission 12 months from the date of issue.

In December 2002, the Company received  approximately $450,000 of proceeds under
the note and  provided  the  Lender the  pledged  shares.  Since  that date,  no
additional  proceeds were provided by the Lender and repeated attempts were made
by the Company to secure the additional  proceeds.  The Company has  effectively
accounted  for the Lender's  failure to fund the facility and return the pledged
shares  as a  foreclosure  on the  loan  collateral.  Accordingly,  the  Company
recorded a $1,047,728 loss during the year ended December 31, 2002.

On March  13,  2003,  the  Company  issued  40,000  replacement  shares  with an
aggregate fair value of $3,708,000 to the  stockholders who pledged their shares
under  the  Accommodation  Agreements.  Accordingly,  the  Company  recorded  an
additional  loss of $2,210,272  during the year ended  December 31, 2003 for the
difference between the


                                       23
<PAGE>


loss the Company  recorded upon the Lender's  foreclosure  of the collateral and
the aggregate fair value of the replacement shares.

In  addition,  the  Accommodation  Agreements  provided for the Company to pay a
penalty  in the  event of its  failure  to cause  the  replacement  shares to be
registered  on or before March 31, 2003.  As a result,  the Company has recorded
stock based  penalties for the fair value of 15,000  shares per quarter  through
December 31, 2005.

The total stock-based  penalties  associated with the  Accommodation  Agreements
from April 2003 to December  31, 2005 were  $3,318,975.  An aggregate of 165,000
shares were issuable through  December 31, 2005 under the stock-based  penalties
associated with the Accommodation Agreements.

On March 27, 2006, the Company  entered into an agreement to release and resolve
all  outstanding  claims  between the parties  under the  creditor  and claimant
liabilities restructuring (Note 17).

STOCK PLEDGE ARRANGEMENT

In April 2004, a stockholder  of the Company  entered into a one-year stock loan
financing  arrangement ("Stock Financing Facility") with a third party financial
institution (the "Lender I"),  pursuant to which such  stockholder  committed to
obtain financing for the Company under a credit facility  collateralized  by the
pledge of 22,834  shares of  registered  stock (the  "Pledged  Stock")  that was
pledged by a second stockholder (the "Pledging Stockholder"). In connection with
this  arrangement,  the Company  executed an  accommodation  agreement  with the
Pledging Stockholder  committing to issue 22,834 shares of restricted stock (the
"Replacement Stock") on April 2, 2005 (the "Termination Date") in the event of a
loss of the Pledged Stock, plus a premium of 6,850 shares (the "Premium Shares")
for entering  into the  agreement.  The Company  also agreed to register  10,000
shares of restricted  stock held by the Pledging  Stockholder (the "Held Stock")
within thirty days of the  agreement  and to use its best efforts  register with
the SEC,  both the  Replacement  Stock and Premium  Stock  within 12 months from
their date of issue.

The  Company  received  $40,012 of funds but was unable to recover  the  Pledged
Stock on the Termination Date. In addition, due to a delay in registering all of
the  shares  under  this  arrangement,  the  Company  entered  into a  secondary
agreement  with  the  Pledging  Stockholder  providing  for:  (1) the  immediate
issuance of the Replacement  Shares and Premium Shares;  (2) registration of the
Replacement Shares,  Premium Shares and Held Shares; (3) the retroactive accrual
of a penalty  from May 2, 2004  through the date the  registration  statement is
filed  payable in such  number of shares  that is equal to 15% of the Held Stock
(prorated  for each  fraction of a year);  and (4) the accrual of an  additional
penalty from April 2, 2005 through the date the registration  statement is filed
equal to 15% of the  Replacement  Stock and  Premium  Stock  (prorated  for each
fraction of a year).

The Company  recorded a charge of $406,205 for the fair value of the Replacement
Stock and Premium Stock (29,684 shares) issued to the Pledging Stockholder under
this arrangement. Such charge, net of $40,012 of advances received, is presented
as a loss on collateralized  financing arrangement in the accompanying statement
of operations. The Company also recorded charges of $2,852 and $9,014 during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,  respectively  for the fair value of
1,501 and 370 shares  issuable  during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005,  respectively  to the Pledging  Stockholder as penalties for the delays in
registering the stock. The charges associated with the penalties are included in
stock  based  penalties  under  accommodation  agreements  in  the  accompanying
statements of operations.


NOTE 16 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

SEC INVESTIGATION

Pursuant  to  Section  20(a)  of the  Securities  Act and  Section  21(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act, the staff of the SEC (the "Staff"), issued an order (In
the Matter of Patron Systems, Inc. - Order Directing a Private Investigation and
Designating  Officers to Take  Testimony  (C-03739-A,  February 12,  2004)) (the
"Order")  that a  private  investigation  (the "SEC  Investigation")  be made to
determine whether certain actions of, among others, the Company,  certain of its
officers  and  directors  and  others  violated  Section  5(a)  and  5(c) of the
Securities Act and/or


                                       24
<PAGE>


Section 10 and Rule 10b-5  promulgated  under the Exchange Act.  Generally,  the
Order  provides,  among other things,  that the Staff is  investigating  (i) the
legality of two (2)  separate  Registration  Statements  filed by the Company on
Form S-8,  filed on December 20, 2002 and on April 2, 2003,  as amended on April
9, 2003 (collectively,  the "Registration Statements"),  covering the resale of,
in the aggregate,  145,834 shares of common stock issued to various  consultants
of the  Company,  and (ii)  whether in  connection  with the purchase or sale of
shares of common stock, certain officers and directors of the Company and others
(a) sold common stock in violation  of Section 5 of the  Securities  Act and/or,
(b) made  misrepresentations  and/or omissions of material facts and/or employed
fraudulent  devices in connection  with such purchases  and/or sales relating to
certain of the Company's press releases regarding,  among other items,  proposed
mergers  and  acquisitions  that were  never  consummated.  If the SEC brings an
action  against the Company,  it could  result in,  among other  items,  a civil
injunctive  order or an  administrative  cease-and-desist  order  being  entered
against the  Company,  in  addition to the  imposition  of a  significant  civil
penalty.  Moreover,  the SEC Investigation  and/or a subsequent SEC action could
affect adversely the Company's ability to have its common stock become listed on
a stock exchange and/or quoted on the NASD Bulletin Board or NASDAQ, the Company
being able to sell its securities and/or have its securities registered with the
SEC and/or in various  states  and/or the  Company's  ability to  implement  its
business plan. To date, the Company's legal counsel  representing the Company in
such matters has indicated that the SEC  Investigation  is ongoing and the Staff
has not indicated  whether it will or will not  recommend  that the SEC bring an
enforcement action against the Company, its officers, directors and/or others.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Sherleigh  Associates Inc. Profit Sharing Plan  ("Sherleigh")  filed a complaint
against the  Company,  Patrick  Allin,  former  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, and Robert E. Yaw, the Company's non-executive Chairman, on February 3,
2004, in the United States District Court for the Southern  District of New York
(the "Court")  alleging common law fraud.  The complaint  alleged that Sherleigh
was fraudulently  induced into purchasing  33,334 shares of Company common stock
in reliance upon certain of the  Company's  press  releases and allegedly  false
statements by Mr. Allin and Mr. Yaw,  concerning the Company's  plans to acquire
two target companies,  TrustWave  Corporation  (currently a strategic partner of
the Company) and  Entelagent  (a current  subsidiary  of the  Company),  and its
financing arrangements regarding those acquisitions.  Sherleigh seeks rescission
of its  purchase  agreement  and  return  of its  $2,000,000  purchase  price or
compensatory  damages to be proven at trial.  Mr. Allin recently  entered into a
settlement  agreement with Sherleigh and is requesting that the Court include in
its  dismissal  order  a  finding  that  the  settlement  is  reasonable  and  a
prohibition  against any claims by the Company or Mr. Yaw against Mr.  Allin for
contribution or indemnification  with respect to Sherleigh's claims. The Company
has opposed Mr. Allin's request.  The Court has not yet issued any ruling on Mr.
Allin's request. Discovery has been completed, but no trial date has been set by
the Court.  The Company  believes the  Plaintiff's  claims are without merit and
intends to continue to defend  against them through  trial,  if  necessary.  The
amount of loss,  if any,  with  respect  to the claim  cannot  be  predicted  or
quantified  at this time and,  therefore,  no amounts have been  recorded on the
books  of the  Company.  On  April  24,  2006,  the  Company  and the  Sherleigh
Associates Inc. Profit Sharing Plan entered into a final and binding  settlement
of all claims (Note 21).

On January 5, 2006,  Mark P. Gertz,  Trustee in  bankruptcy  for Arter & Hadden,
LLP,  filed an Adversary  Complaint  for Recovery of Assets of the Estate in the
United  States  Bankruptcy  Court  Northern  District of Ohio Eastern  Division,
against  the  Company as  successor  in merger to  Entelagent.  Mr.  Gertz seeks
$32,278.18 plus interest  accruing at the statutory rate since July 15, 2003 for
services rendered by Arter & Hadden,  LLP to Entelagent.  The Company intends to
respond to this  complaint  within the time  allotted  by  statute.  The Company
intends to attempt to settle  this claim as part of the  creditor  and  claimant
liabilities restructuring (Note 17).

While  the  Company  believes  it  has  defenses  to  the  claims  noted  above,
notwithstanding  the fact that the Company  intends to  vigorously  defend these
actions, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in its defense
of any of these  claims.  In the event the Company is required to pay damages in
connection  with any one or more of the claims  asserted in these actions,  such
payment  could have a material  adverse  effect on the  Company's  business  and
operations.


                                       25
<PAGE>


GRAUL CLAIM

On March 3, 2006,  the Company,  Ms. Graul and a third party  ("Buyer")  entered
into an  arrangement  providing for Ms. Graul to assign and transfer all rights,
title and interest in her original claim of $931,659  against the Company to the
Buyer in exchange  for a cash  payment in the amount of  $180,000.  On March 15,
2006, the Company advanced the $180,000 payment to Ms. Graul in exchange for her
immediate  release of all claims  against the Company.  The Company is currently
awaiting  payment in the same  amount  from the Buyer in order to  complete  the
assignment of such claim to the Buyer. This arrangement further provides for the
Company to acknowledge Ms. Graul's  original claim for the benefit of the Buyer,
the rescission of the August 2005  settlement and release,  and for the Buyer to
participate  in the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring  (Note 17)
with respect to the settlement of Ms. Graul's original claim.

STOCK  SUBSCRIPTION  AND MUTUAL  RELEASE  AGREEMENTS  WITH PATRICK ALLIN AND THE
ALLIN DYNASTIC TRUST

On January 1, 2006,  the Company and Mr.  Patrick  Allin and The Allin  Dynastic
Trust entered into Stock  Subscription  Agreement and Mutual Release  agreements
(the "Series A-1 Agreements") to settle all claims in law, equity,  or otherwise
("Allin Subscriber Claims") arising out of the business relationship between the
parties that Mr. Allin and The Allin  Dynastic  Trust may have with the Company.
The Series A-1 Agreements provide for the issuance of 1,875,000 shares of Series
A-1  Preferred  Stock to Mr.  Allin and 625,000  shares of Series A-1  Preferred
Stock to The Allin Dynastic Trust. The aggregate purchase price is equivalent to
the value of the Allin  Subscriber  Claims being settled through this settlement
and  release.  The total of these  claims  at  December  31,  2005  amounted  to
$2,000,000.  Mr. Allin and The Allin Dynastic Trust are each deemed to have paid
for the Series A-1 Preferred  Stock through the  settlement and release of Allin
Subscriber  Claims.  See Note 18 for further details of the Series A-1 Preferred
stock and Note 17 for the creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring.

SETTLEMENT OF LINTING LAWSUIT

On February  14,  2006,  the Company and Richard  Linting  entered  into a Stock
Subscription  Agreement & Mutual  Release  ("Linting  Agreement")  to settle all
claims in law, equity or otherwise ("Linting  Subscriber Claims") arising out of
the business relationship between the parties that Mr. Linting may have with the
Company.  The Linting  Agreement  provides for the issuance of 1,777,261  shares
(the "Shelved  Stock") of Series A-1  Preferred  stock.  The aggregate  purchase
price is equivalent to the value of the Linting  Subscriber Claims being settled
through this settlement and release.  The total set aside purchase price for the
Shelved  Stock  shall be $0.80  per share or an  aggregate  of  $1,421,809.  Mr.
Linting is deemed to have paid for the Series A-1  Preferred  stock  through the
settlement and release of the Linting Subscriber Claims. This agreement provides
for the transfer of the Shelved Stock in stock  certificate  installments and in
such  numbers  and at such times as  directed  by Mr.  Linting.  See Note 18 for
further  details of the Series A-1 Preferred  stock and Note 17 for the creditor
and claimant liabilities restructuring.

SETTLEMENT OF HARARY, ET AL. LAWSUITS

On March 27,  2006,  the  Company  reached  agreement  with Paul  Harary,  Paris
McKinzie,  Maria Caporicci,  LLB Ltd. and DGC, Inc. (the "Subscribers")  whereby
each of the Subscribers and the Company mutually release the other party and its
respective stockholders,  directors,  officers, employees, etc. from any and all
past, present and future claims that can or have been brought by the other party
relating  to any  act or  omission  occurring  on or  prior  to the  date of the
Agreement.  Additionally,  the Company  agreed to a payment to the  Subscribers,
including attorneys' fees, of $125,090.  The Subscribers agreed to purchase from
the Company  3,000,000  shares of the Company's  Series A-1 Preferred Stock, the
purchase  price for the stock shall be $0.80 per share and shall be paid through
this settlement and release of $2,400,000 of Subscriber  claims. See Note 18 for
further  details of the Series A-1 Preferred  stock and Note 17 for the creditor
and claimant liabilities restructuring.

BRADEN WAVERLEY, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

On February 17, 2006,  the Company  entered into an  employment  agreement  (the
"Waverley Agreement") with Braden Waverley ("Waverley"), the Company's new Chief
Operating Officer. The term of the Waverley Agreement


                                       26
<PAGE>


is one year with automatic one-year renewal unless Mr. Waverley is provided with
written notice of non-renewal 90 days prior to expiration of the current term of
the Waverley  Agreement.  The Waverley  Agreement  provides for a base salary of
$200,000 per year.  The Waverley  Agreement  provides  for a  performance  bonus
determined in accordance  with revenue  milestones  established  by the Board of
Directors on a quarterly  basis.  Mr. Waverley is eligible to receive a bonus of
up to 75% of base salary for each quarter  that the Company  achieves the agreed
upon revenue milestones.  Additionally,  the Waverley Agreement provides for the
grant of stock  options  in an  amount  representing  an  aggregate  3.5% of the
outstanding  shares  of  Company  common  stock on the date of grant  ("Waverley
Initial Grant").  The Waverley Initial Grant is for 73,371 shares at an exercise
price  of $1.65  per  share.  Additionally,  Mr.  Waverley  will be  granted  an
additional option ("Waverley  Additional  Option") intended to be made under the
terms of the  Employment  Agreement  as an  antidilutive  grant,  following  the
Company's  completion  of its  recapitalization  under the creditor and claimant
liabilities  restructuring  program  and  the  effectiveness  of a  registration
statement  for the  resale of such  shares  so that Mr.  Waverley  would  retain
options to purchase up to 3.5% of the Company's fully diluted common stock.  Mr.
Waverley's  Employment  Agreement  also  provided for the grant of an additional
option  to  purchase  that  number  of  shares  of the  Company's  common  stock
representing  an aggregate of 3.5% of the  outstanding  shares of the  Company's
common  stock on a  fully-diluted  basis upon his  intended  appointment  as the
Company's  Chief  Executive  Officer.  These options have a term of 10 years and
vest 20% on the date of grant and 1/48th of the  balance on the last day of each
month for the next 48 months following the effective date of this agreement.

MARTIN T. JOHNSON, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

On February 17, 2006,  the Company  entered into an  employment  agreement  (the
"Johnson Agreement") with Martin T. Johnson ("Johnson"), the Company's new Chief
Financial Officer.  The term of the Johnson Agreement is one year with automatic
one-year  renewal  unless  Mr.  Johnson  is  provided  with  written  notice  of
non-renewal  90 days prior to  expiration  of the  current  term of the  Johnson
Agreement.  The Johnson  Agreement  provides  for a base salary of $180,000  per
year.  The Johnson  Agreement  provides for a  performance  bonus  determined in
accordance  with revenue  milestones  established by the Board of Directors on a
quarterly basis. Mr. Johnson is eligible to receive a bonus of up to 50% of base
salary for each  quarter  that the  Company  achieves  the agreed  upon  revenue
milestones.  Additionally, the Johnson Agreement provides for the grant of stock
options in an amount  representing an aggregate 1.25% of the outstanding  shares
of Company  common stock on the date of grant  ("Johnson  Initial  Grant").  The
Johnson  Initial  Grant is for 26,204  shares at an exercise  price of $1.65 per
share. Additionally,  Mr. Johnson will be granted an additional option ("Johnson
Additional  Option")  intended  to be made  under  the  terms of the  Employment
Agreement as an antidilutive  grant,  following the Company's  completion of its
recapitalization  under the  creditor  and  claimant  liabilities  restructuring
program and the effectiveness of a registration statement for the resale of such
shares so that Mr.  Johnson would retain  options to purchase up to 1.25% of the
Company's fully diluted common stock.  These options have a term of 10 years and
vest 20% on the date of grant and 1/48th of the  balance on the last day of each
month for the next 48 months following the effective date of this agreement.

ROBERT CROSS - BONUS ARRANGEMENT

On March 7, 2006, the Patron Board of Directors,  in executive  session  without
Mr. Cross being present,  approved a bonus arrangement ("Bonus Arrangement") for
Mr.  Cross.  The  Bonus  Arrangement  provides  for (i) a cash  bonus  equal  to
$200,000,  grossed up for taxes (the "Cash Bonus"), (ii) the Cash Bonus would be
payable  only after  agreement  has been  reached  with  creditors  holding  the
applicable  percentage of Patron's  creditor  obligations agree to convert their
obligations under the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring and when
the funding escrow  established  by Laidlaw has been released (the  "Eligibility
Date"),  (iii) 50% of the Cash Bonus would be paid on the Eligibility  Date, and
the  other 50% would be paid in ten equal  monthly  installments  beginning  one
month following the Eligibility  Date. Mr. Cross would be granted a stock option
in an amount representing an aggregate 2.5% of the outstanding shares of Company
common stock  following the completion of the Company's  recapitalization  under
the creditor and claimant liabilities  restructuring.  These options have a term
of 10 years and vest 20% on the date of grant and  1/48th of the  balance on the
last day of each month for the next 48 months following the Eligibility Date.


                                       27
<PAGE>


NOTE 17 - CREDITOR AND CLAIMANT LIABILITIES RESTRUCTURING

On January 12, 2006, the Company issued a Stock Subscription  Agreement & Mutual
Release ("the Original Release") to each creditor and claimant ("Subscriber") of
the Company for purposes of entering  into a final and binding  settlement  with
respect to any and all claims,  liabilities,  demands,  causes of action, costs,
expenses,  attorneys fees, damages,  indemnities,  and obligations of every kind
and  nature  that  the  creditor  and/or  claimant  may have  with  the  Company
("Subscriber  Claims").  Under terms of this agreement,  the Company sold to the
Subscriber and the Subscriber purchased from the Company shares ("Stock") of its
Series A-1 Preferred stock at a price of $0.80 per share. The aggregate purchase
price was equivalent to the value of the Subscriber Claims being settled through
this  settlement  and release.  Subscriber was deemed to have paid for the Stock
through the settlement and release of Subscriber Claims. Each share of Stock was
automatically  convertible into 1/3 share of the Company's common stock upon the
effectiveness  of an amendment to the  Company's  certificate  of  incorporation
which provided for a sufficient number of authorized but unissued and unreserved
shares of the Company's  common stock to permit the conversion of all issued and
outstanding  shares of Series A-1  Preferred.  The Company issued the Series A-1
Preferred shares following the final  determination of the claims and acceptance
by the Company of each  claimant  submitted  Stock  Subscription  Agreement  and
Mutual Release through countersignature thereof.

The Original  Release also  provided that in the event that (a) a bona fide sale
or (series of related  sales) by the Company of equity  interests in the Company
in  an  amount  equal  to  or  in  excess  of  $3,000,000  or  (b)  any  merger,
consolidation,     recapitalization,      reclassification,     reincorporation,
reorganization,  share exchange,  sale of all or substantially all of the assets
of the Company or comparable transaction, was not consummated on or before March
31, 2006 (the "Termination  Date"),  the Stock  Subscription  Agreement & Mutual
Release would terminate and be null and void, the Series A-1 Preferred issued to
Subscriber  would be cancelled  and the  Subscriber  Claims would remain in full
force and effect on their terms.  Each Subscriber agreed not to transfer or sell
any portion of the Stock until the next business day after the Termination Date,
subject  to (i) an  effective  registration  under  the  Securities  Act or in a
transaction  which is otherwise in compliance  with the Securities  Act, (ii) an
effective  registration  under any applicable state  securities  statute or in a
transaction otherwise in compliance with any applicable state securities statue,
and (iii) evidence of compliance  with the applicable  securities  laws of other
jurisdictions.  As  described  below,  the  Company  completed  the sale of $4.8
million in equity securities under the Series A Preferred Financing on March 27,
2006  thereby  eliminating  the  provision  for  automatic  termination  of this
arrangement.

The  following  table  provides  a summary  as of March 31,  2006 of all  claims
settled by category with the (gain) loss recognized on the settlement:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Series A-1     Fair Value       Claim
            Settlement Category              Stock Issued     of Stock        Amount       (Gain)/Loss
------------------------------------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>            <C>             <C>
General Creditors ........................     20,538,589   $ 12,022,994   $ 16,298,504    $ (4,275,510)
Stockholders under Accommodation Agreement      3,000,000      2,400,000      2,400,000            --
Mr. Allin and the Allin Dynastic Trust ...      2,500,000      1,500,000      1,317,089         182,911
Other Claimants ..........................      7,381,489      4,428,894      1,243,282    $  3,185,612
                                             ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------
                                               33,420,078   $ 20,351,888   $ 21,258,875    $   (906,987)
                                             ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------
</TABLE>

The fair value of the Series A-1 shares issued in  settlements  reached prior to
March  31,  2006  amounted  to $0.60 per  share,  based on a  comparison  of the
features  of  these  shares  to  similar   shares  sold  in  private   placement
transactions  to  unrelated  parties  for  cash  and the  trading  price  of the
Company's  shares at the time of the settlements.  These  settlement  agreements
effectuated a complete settlement of these debts, claims and liabilities and the
mutual release of the parties with respect thereto.

The Company accounted for the  extinguishment of liabilities  payable to general
creditors in accordance  with SFAS 15  "Accounting  by Debtors and Creditors for
Troubled Debt  Restructurings,"  due to the fact that the holders of these notes
granted to Company  concessions  intended to alleviate its  immediate  liquidity
constraints. These concessions


                                       28
<PAGE>


that the creditors  granted to the Company  enabled it to (a)  effectuate  their
settlement  through  an  exchange  of  equity  instead  of a use of cash and (b)
consummate a private  placement of equity  securities (Note 20) that resulted in
an infusion of cash that was needed to sustain operations.

Claimants other than Mr. Allin and the Allin Dynastic Trust that participated in
the  settlement   include  certain  parties  that  were  previously  engaged  in
litigation with the Company  including the Sherleigh  Associates  Profit Sharing
Plan to which the  Company  issued  2,312,500  shares for a  settlement  loss of
$1,387,500,  Richard Linting to whom the Company issued  1,777,261  shares for a
settlement  loss of  approximately  $773,000  and the holders of the Marie Graul
claim to whom the  Company  issued  1,164,461  shares for a  settlement  loss of
approximately $698,000.


NOTE 18 - SERIES A AND SERIES A-1 PREFERRED STOCK

On March 1, 2006,  the  Company  filed with the  Delaware  Secretary  of State a
Certificate of Designation of  Preferences,  Rights and  Limitations of Series A
Convertible   Preferred  Stock  and  Series  A-1  Convertible   Preferred  Stock
designating  the rights,  preferences and privileges of 2,160 shares of Series A
Preferred stock and 50,000,000 shares of Series A-1 Preferred stock.

SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK

The Series A  Preferred  stock has a stated  value of $5,000  per share,  has no
maturity  date,  carries  a  dividend  of 10%  per  annum,  with  such  dividend
accumulating  on a  cumulative  basis  and is  payable  only (i) at such time as
declared  payable by the Board of  Directors of the Company or (ii) in the event
of  liquidation,  as part of the  liquidation  preference  amount  ("Liquidation
Preference Amount").  The Liquidation  Preference Amount is equal to 125% of the
sum of:  (i) the  stated  value  of any  then  unconverted  shares  of  Series A
Preferred stock and (ii) any accrued and unpaid dividends  thereon.  An event of
liquidation  means any  liquidation,  dissolution  or winding up of the Company,
whether  voluntary  or  involuntary,  as well as any  change of  control  of the
Company which includes the sale by the Company of either (x)  substantially  all
its assets or (y) the portion of its assets which  comprises  its core  business
technology, products or services.

The Series A Preferred stock is convertible,  at the option of the holder,  into
shares  of the  Company's  common  stock  ("Conversion  Shares")  at an  initial
conversion  price  ("Initial  Conversion  Price") which shall be $2.40 per share
based on the stated value of the Series A Preferred stock, subject to adjustment
for stock splits, dividends, recapitalizations, reclassifications, payments made
to Common Stock holders and other similar events and for issuances of additional
securities at prices more  favorable  than the  conversion  price at the date of
such issuance.

The Series A  Preferred  stock is  mandatorily  convertible  into  shares of the
Company's  common  stock at the Initial  Conversion  Price,  which is subject to
adjustment as described above, on the date that: (i) there shall be an effective
registration  statement covering the resale of the Conversion  Shares,  (ii) the
average  closing  price  of the  Company's  common  stock,  for a  period  of 20
consecutive  trading  days is at least  250% of the then  applicable  Conversion
Price,  and (iii) the average daily trading volume of the Company's common stock
for the same period is at least 8,334 shares.

SERIES A-1 PREFERRED STOCK

The Series A-1  Preferred  stock has a stated  value of $0.80 per share,  has no
maturity  date,  carries a  non-cumulative  dividend of 5% per annum,  with such
dividend  payable  only (i) at such  time as  declared  payable  by the Board of
Directors  of the  Company or (ii) in the event of  liquidation,  as part of the
liquidation  preference amount ("Series A-1 Liquidation Preference Amount"). The
Series A-1 Liquidation  Preference Amount is equal to the sum of: (i) the stated
value of any then unconverted  shares of Series A-1 Preferred stock and (ii) any
accrued  and  unpaid  dividends  thereon.  An event  of  liquidation  means  any
liquidation,  dissolution  or winding up of the  Company,  whether  voluntary or
involuntary,  as well as any change of control of the Company which includes the
sale by the  Company  of  either  (x)  substantially  all its  assets or (y) the
portion of its assets which comprises its core business technology,  products or
services.


                                       29
<PAGE>


The Series A-1 Preferred  stock is not  convertible at the option of the holder.
Each  share of  Series  A-1  Preferred  stock  automatically  converts  into the
Company's  common stock,  at a conversion  price of $2.40 per share based on the
stated value of the Series A-1 Preferred  stock,  upon the  effectiveness  of an
amendment to the Company's  certificate  of  incorporation  which provides for a
sufficient  number of authorized  shares to permit the exercise or conversion of
all  issued  and  outstanding  shares of Series A  Preferred  stock,  Series A-1
Preferred stock and all options,  warrants and other rights to acquire shares of
the Company's common stock.

PRIVATE PLACEMENT OF SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANTS

In January 2006, the Company initiated a $5,400,000  financing  transaction (the
"Series A Preferred  Financing")  which would, for each $100,000 Unit purchased,
result in the  issuance  of (i) 20 shares of Series A  Preferred  Stock and (ii)
warrants  ("Investor  Warrants")  to purchase  13,888.9  shares of the Company's
common  stock.  The  minimum  amount  of the  Series A  Preferred  Financing  is
$3,000,000 ("Minimum Amount") and the maximum amount is $5,400,000.  Apex agreed
to purchase up to  $1,500,000  which will all be  available  to fund the Minimum
Amount,  provided however, in the event that the Series A Preferred Financing is
over-subscribed  as to the  Minimum  Amount,  then for each  $1.00 of such  over
subscription  up to $250,000,  the Apex funding  commitment will be reduced on a
dollar for dollar basis,  down to a minimum amount of $1,250,000.  Additionally,
holders of the 2006 Bridge Notes were  mandatorily  obligated to exchange  their
2006  Bridge  Notes  for  Units  in  the  Series  A  Preferred   Financing  upon
consummation of the Series A Preferred Financing at the face value of their 2006
Bridge  Notes.  The issuance of Units to the holders of 2006 Bridge Notes counts
toward satisfying the Minimum Amount.

The Investor  Warrants have a term of 5 years and an exercise price of $3.00 per
share.  Each  Investor  Warrant  will  entitle  the holder  thereof to  purchase
13,888.9 shares of the Company's common stock (the "Warrant Shares"), subject to
anti-dilution provisions similar to those of the conversion rights of the Series
A Preferred stock. The Company is obligated to include the Conversion Shares and
the Warrant Shares in the Registration Statement which the Company has committed
to file in connection with the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring
described  above.  The  Conversion  Shares and the Warrant Shares will also have
piggyback registration rights.

In  connection  with the Series A  Preferred  Financing,  the  Company  retained
Laidlaw as its  non-exclusive  placement  agent  ("Series A Preferred  Placement
Agent").  Laidlaw  shall  receive,  in its role as Series A Preferred  Placement
Agent,  (i) a cash fee equal to 10% of all gross  proceeds,  excluding  the Apex
proceeds, delivered at each Closing and (ii) a warrant (the "Agent Warrants") to
purchase  the  Company's  common  stock  equal to 10%  times  the sum of (x) the
Conversion  Shares  to be  issued  upon  conversion  of the  shares  of Series A
Preferred  stock  issued  at each  Closing  and (y) the  number of shares of the
Company's  common stock  reserved for issuance upon the exercise of the Investor
Warrants issued at each closing. The Agent Warrants shall have a term of 5 years
and an exercise  price of $3.00 per share.  Additionally,  the Company shall pay
the Series A Preferred  Placement Agent a  non-accountable  expense allowance of
$25,000. The Agent Warrants have a fair value of $274,393.  Assumptions relating
to the  estimated  fair value of these  warrants  are as follows:  fair value of
common stock of $0.80; risk-free interest rate of 4.52%; expected dividend yield
zero percent;  expected  warrant life of five years;  and current  volatility of
125%.

On March 3, 2006, the investors in the Series A Preferred  Financing agreed to a
modification of the terms of this financing arrangement to waive the requirement
for 100% completion of the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring for
release of the net  proceeds  of the Series A  Preferred  Financing  in order to
allow the Company to proceed with its business plan and to protect the investors
in the Series A  Preferred  Financing.  The  modifications  provide  for the net
proceeds  of the Series A Preferred  Financing  to be  deposited  with an escrow
agent whereby funds will be released to the Company to cover  payroll,  rent and
other operating costs,  including eligible payables not otherwise subject to the
creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring, on a bi-monthly basis.

As of March 27, 2006, the Company  consummated the Series A Preferred  Financing
with the closing of funds totaling $4,465,501,  resulting in the issuance of 893
shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 620,233 common stock purchase warrants to
the  purchasers  of the Series A Preferred  Stock.  This amount is  comprised on
$720,001  associated with the conversion of the Bridge Notes,  $895,000 provided
by Apex and  $2,850,500  from parties  made  available by the Series A Preferred
Placement  Agent.  The Company has also issued to Laidlaw  198,375  common stock
purchase  warrants,  the  Agent  Warrants,  to  Laidlaw  as  Series A  Preferred
Placement  Agent.  The  Investor   Warrants  have  a  fair  value  of  $857,908.
Assumptions  relating  to the  estimated  fair  value of these  warrants  are as
follows: fair value of common stock of $1.71;  risk-free interest rate of 4.52%;
expected  dividend yield zero percent;  expected warrant life of five years; and
current  volatility of 125%. The Company paid Laidlaw a Series A Placement Agent
fee of $339,051 which includes the $54,000  placement  agent fee associated with
the 2006 Bridge Notes.


                                       30
<PAGE>


In order to effect the  availability  of these funds to the Company prior to the
completion of the creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring,  the Company,
on March 27, 2006, entered into a post-closing  restricted cash escrow agreement
("Post-Closing  Escrow Agreement") with an escrow agent ("Escrow Agent").  As of
March 27,  2006,  the  Escrow  Agent was  provided  $2,183,026  in net  offering
proceeds.   The  escrow   agent  is  holding  the  funds  and  making   periodic
disbursements  to the Company on or after the 15th of each calendar month and on
or after the last day of each calendar month. The Company is required to provide
a detailed schedule of the mid-month, month-end and maximum monthly disbursement
amounts to  substantiate  its  request  for a release of any funds.  The Company
cannot  provide  any  assurance  that it will be  successful  in its  efforts to
complete the creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring. Additionally there
is no assurance that by securing this  additional  financing the Company will be
successful in the implementation and execution of its business plan.


NOTE 19 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS

On January 28, 2006 the Company  issued  warrants for 20,000  shares at a $18.00
per share exercise price to Apex in connection with the Interim Bridge Financing
III financing. The aggregate fair value of these warrants amounted to $20,316.

On February  13, 2006 the Company  issued  warrants for 6,000 shares at a $18.00
per share exercise price to Apex in connection with the Interim Bridge Financing
III financing. The aggregate fair value of these warrants amounted to $6,634.

On February  21, 2006 the Company  issued  warrants for 1,250 shares at a $18.00
per share exercise price to Apex in connection with the Interim Bridge Financing
III financing. The aggregate fair value of these warrants amounted to $1,382.

On March 1, 2006 the Company  issued  warrants  for 6,417 shares at a $18.00 per
share exercise price to Apex in connection with the Interim Bridge Financing III
financing. The aggregate fair value of these warrants amounted to $10,029.

On March 17, 2006 the Company  issued  warrants for 3,750 shares at a $18.00 per
share exercise price to Apex in connection with the Interim Bridge Financing III
financing. The aggregate fair value of these warrants amounted to $5,861.

On March 22, 2006 the Company  issued  warrants for 2,500 shares at a $18.00 per
share exercise price to Apex in connection with the Interim Bridge Financing III
financing. The aggregate fair value of these warrants amounted to $3,907.

On March 27, 2006 the Company issued  warrants for 620,233 shares at a $3.00 per
share  exercise  price to the  investors in the Series A Preferred  Financing in
connection  with the Series A  Preferred  Financing.  Additionally,  the Company
issued  198,375  common stock  purchase  warrants at a $3.00 per share  exercise
price to Laidlaw as placement agent in the Series A Preferred Financing.

ISSUANCE OF EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS

During the three months ended March 31, 2006,  the Company  issued stock options
to  employees  to  purchase  99,575  shares.  These  options  include a grant to
purchase 73,371 shares at $1.65 per share, with a fair value of $94,436,  to the
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Mr. Braden Waverley, upon the signing of
his employment  agreement with the Company.  Additionally,  the Company  granted
options  to  purchase  26,204  shares at $1.65 per  share,  with a fair value of
$33,727, to Mr. Martin T. Johnson,  the Company's Chief Financial Officer,  upon
the signing of his employment agreement with the Company.


                                       31
<PAGE>


The fair value of the unvested portion of stock options issued prior to December
31, 2005 was $776,251 as of December 31, 2005.  Including the options granted in
the three months ended March 31, 2006, the fair value of the unvested portion of
stock option grants as of March 31, 2006 is $731,080.


NOTE 20 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During the three months  ended March 31, 2006,  the Company made the decision to
streamline the Company's business focus on enterprise level software and service
solutions designed to help customers create,  manage and apply complex rule sets
that support business policies, enhance work flow processes,  enforce regulatory
compliance  and  reduce  the  time,  cost and  overhead  of  electronic  message
management. This decision resulted in the Company's decision to find a buyer for
the LucidLine  business.  Based on this  decision,  the Company has recorded the
assets net of liabilities as assets of discontinued  operations on the Condensed
Consolidated  Balance  Sheet as of March 31, 2006 and has  recorded  the loss on
discontinued  operations on the Condensed  Consolidated  Statement of Operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005. Revenue associated
with the  discontinued  operations  was $99,167 and $42,430 for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Loss on discontinued operations was
$104,962  and  $102,377  for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2006 and 2005,
respectively.

On April 18, 2006,  the Company  entered into a Stock  Purchase  Agreement  with
Walnut Valley,  Inc.  pursuant to which the Company sold all of the  outstanding
shares of LucidLine, Inc.(Note 21).


NOTE 21 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

ADDITIONAL SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANT SALE

On April 3, 2006, the Company  received  $355,000  associated  with the Series A
Preferred  Financing  from Apex  Investment  Fund V, L.P.  With receipt of these
funds,  the  Company  issued 71 shares of Series A  Preferred  Stock and  49,306
common stock purchase warrants.  Receipt of these funds completes the funding of
the Series A Preferred Financing.

SALE OF LUCIDLINE, INC.

On April 18, 2006,  the Company  entered into a Stock  Purchase  Agreement  with
Walnut Valley,  Inc.  pursuant to which the Company sold all of the  outstanding
shares of LucidLine,  Inc.,  the Company's  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  to Walnut
Valley,  Inc. in consideration for a cash payment of $25,000 and the issuance of
a Promissory  Note in the principal  amount of $25,000 by Walnut Valley in favor
to the Company.  The sale of LucidLine is designed to  streamline  the Company's
business focus on enterprise  level software and service  solutions  designed to
help customers create,  manage and apply complex rule sets that support business
policies, enhance work flow processes,  enforce regulatory compliance and reduce
the time, cost and overhead of electronic message management.

SETTLEMENT OF SHERLEIGH ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN LAWSUIT

On April 24, 2006, the Company entered into a Stock  Subscription  Agreement and
Mutual  Release  with  the  Sherleigh  Associates,   Inc.  Profit  Sharing  Plan
("Sherleigh").  This agreement  provides for a final and binding settlement with
respect to any and all claims,  liabilities,  demands,  causes of action, costs,
expenses,  attorneys fees, damages,  indemnities and obligations of any kind and
nature  in  law,  equity  or  otherwise,   known  and  unknown,   suspected  and
unsuspected,  disclosed and undisclosed  arising out of or in any way related to
the business  relationship  between the parties that  Sherleigh may have against
the Company ("Sherleigh Claims").

In settlement  of the Sherleigh  Claims,  Sherleigh  purchased  from the Company
2,312,500 shares of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $0.80
per share or $1,850,000. The aggregate purchase price is equivalent to the value
of the  Sherleigh  Claims  being  settled,  which  is  being  paid  through  the
settlement and release of the Sherleigh Claims.


                                       32
<PAGE>


On May 4, 2006,  Patron  became  aware that Lok  Technologies,  Inc. had filed a
complaint on or about March 30, 2006 against the  Company,  Entelagent  Software
Corp.  and unnamed  defendants in the Superior  Court of  California,  County of
Santa Clara alleging  breach of contract,  breach of duty of good faith and fair
dealing and unjust enrichment and seeking damages, interest, disgorgement of any
unjust  enrichment,  attorneys fees and cost. Prior to receipt of this notice of
litigation,  the Company  had  recorded a liability  of  $320,000  plus  accrued
interest of $159,432.  The Company believes that it has defenses to these claims
but has proposed to settle this  litigation as part of the creditor and claimant
liabilities  restructuring.  The Company  cannot  provide any assurance that the
ultimate settlement of this claim will not have a material adverse affect on its
financial condition.

FILING OF FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006

On April 10, 2007, the Company filed its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31,  2006.  The Form  10-KSB  for the year ended  December  31,  2006  should be
referred to for  additional  subsequent  events which have occurred  between the
original  filing  date (May 22,  2006) of the Form  10-QSB for the three  months
ended March 31, 2006 and the filing of the Form 10-KSB on April 10, 2007.


                                       33
<PAGE>


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
         OF OPERATIONS


                      PATRON SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

           MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                            AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
                                 MARCH 31, 2006

The following  discussion and analysis  should be read in  conjunction  with the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB,  including the consolidated  financial statements,
and the related notes  thereto,  for the year ended  December 31, 2005 of Patron
Systems,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  (collectively  referred to as  "Patron,"  the
"Company," "we," "us," or "our").  Except for historical  information  contained
herein, the matters discussed below are forward-looking statements made pursuant
to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.  Such  statements  involve  risks and  uncertainties,  including,  but not
limited to, economic,  governmental,  political,  competitive and  technological
factors affecting our operations,  markets,  products,  prices and other factors
discussed  elsewhere  in this  report  and  other  reports  filed by us with the
Securities and Exchange Commission  ("SEC").  These factors may cause results to
differ  materially  from the statements made in this report or otherwise made by
or on our behalf.

OVERVIEW

On February 25, 2005,  we  consummated  the  acquisitions  of Complete  Security
Solutions,  Inc.  ("CSSI") and  LucidLine,  Inc.  ("LucidLine")  pursuant to the
filings of Agreements  and Plans of Merger with the  Secretaries of State of the
States of  Delaware  and  Illinois,  respectively.  On  February  28,  2005,  we
consummated a private placement with accredited  investors in the amount of $3.5
million.  On March 30,  2005,  we  consummated  the  acquisition  of  Entelagent
Software Corp. ("Entelagent") pursuant to the filing of an Agreement and Plan of
Merger with the  Secretary of State of the State of  California.  From March 31,
2005 to December 31,  2005,  we borrowed  $3,300,000  from a  stockholder,  Apex
Investment  Fund V, LP.  During the three  months  ended  September  30, 2005 we
raised  approximately  $3,600,000  in  additional  gross  funds in five  capital
financing  transactions,  which includes converting  $1,650,000 in advances from
stockholders  into Bridge  Notes.  Net  proceeds  from all of these  transaction
amounted to $3,594,000, which were used principally to fund operations and repay
certain  liabilities.  We discuss these  transactions  in further detail in this
report.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006,  we raised  $4,285,501 of
gross proceeds ($3,946,450 net proceeds after the payment of certain transaction
expenses) in the Series A Preferred Financing.

Our strategic  mission is to solve a set of  enterprise-level  customer problems
associated with electronic  message  management,  whether in the form of e-mail,
eforms or instant messaging. Our software and services solutions are designed to
help our  customers  create,  manage and apply  complex  rule sets that  support
business policies,  enhance work flow processes,  enforce regulatory compliance,
and reduce the time,  cost and  overhead  of  message  management.  Our suite of
products  addresses  e-mail  policy  management,   e-mail  retention   policies,
archiving and eDiscovery,  proactive e-mail  supervision,  and the protection of
messages  and their  attachments  in motion  and at rest.  Our  eforms  solution
enables customers to quickly and easily create forms, capture, share, and manage
data in an industry standard format.

We currently offer software solutions that fit into overall corporate compliance
and data protection initiatives by automatically finding, archiving and applying
persistent  protection  to sensitive  data - beyond  authentication  - whenever,
wherever and however sensitive data is shared, accessed and stored. Additionally
we offer software solutions that support real-time secure  collection,  delivery
and  sharing  of  field-based  report  information.  This  software  allows  law
enforcement  and  public-safety  agencies  to have  real-time  access  to  field
reporting  data  for  use  inside  a  department  or  in a  multi-jurisdictional
information sharing system.


                                       34
<PAGE>


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The  preparation of our  consolidated  financial  statements in conformity  with
accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in the  United  States  of  America
requires management to exercise its judgment.  We exercise considerable judgment
with respect to establishing  sound  accounting  polices and in making estimates
and assumptions  that affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities,
our  recognition of revenues and expenses,  and  disclosures of commitments  and
contingencies at the date of the financial statements.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments.  Areas in which we
exercise  significant  judgment include, but are not necessarily limited to, our
valuation of accounts  receivable,  recoverability of long-lived assets,  income
taxes,  equity transactions  (compensatory and financing) and contingencies.  We
have also adopted  certain  polices with respect to our  recognition  of revenue
that we believe are consistent with the guidance  provided under  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  Staff  Accounting  Bulletin No. 104 and estimate values of
delivered and undelivered elements.

We base our  estimates  and  judgments  on a variety  of factors  including  our
historical  experience,  knowledge  of our business  and  industry,  current and
expected  economic  conditions,  the  composition  of our  products,  regulatory
environment,  and in  certain  cases,  the  results of  outside  appraisals.  We
constantly  re-evaluate  our  estimates  and  assumptions  with respect to these
judgments and modify our approach when circumstances indicate that modifications
are necessary.

While we believe that the factors we evaluate provide us with a meaningful basis
for  establishing and applying sound  accounting  policies,  we cannot guarantee
that the  results  will always be  accurate.  Since the  determination  of these
estimates  requires the exercise of judgment,  actual  results could differ from
such estimates.

A  description  of  significant  accounting  polices  that  require  us to  make
estimates and  assumptions  in the  preparation  of our  consolidated  financial
statements are as follows:

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND REVENUE RECOGNITION

We derive  our  revenues  from the  following  sources:  (1)  sales of  computer
software,  which includes new software licenses and software updates and product
support revenues and (2) professional consulting services.

We apply the revenue  recognition  principles set forth under AICPA Statement of
Position ("SOP") 97-2 "Software Revenue Recognition" and Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff  Accounting  Bulletin  ("SAB") 104 "Revenue  Recognition"  with
respect to its  revenue.  Accordingly,  we record  revenue  when (i)  persuasive
evidence  of an  arrangement  exists,  (ii)  delivery  has  occurred,  (iii) the
vendor's fee is fixed or  determinable,  and (iv)  collectability  is reasonably
assured.

We also accrue unbilled revenue under software  licenses and services  delivered
under  contractual  arrangements  which  provide  for  billings  to be  made  at
intervals that may differ from the periods of delivery or performance.

We generate  revenues  through  sales of software  licenses  and annual  support
subscription agreements,  which include access to technical support and software
updates (if and when  available).  Software  license revenues are generated from
licensing  the rights to use products  directly to end-users  and through  third
party service providers.

Revenues from software license agreements are generally recognized upon delivery
of  software to the  customer.  All of our  software  sales are  supported  by a
written  contract  or other  evidence  of sale  transaction  such as a  customer
purchase order.  These forms of evidence  clearly  indicate the selling price to
the  customer,  shipping  terms,  payment  terms  (generally 30 days) and refund
policy,  if any. The selling  prices of these products are fixed at the time the
sale is consummated.

Revenue from post-contract customer support arrangements or undelivered elements
are deferred and  recognized at the time of delivery or over the period in which
the services are performed based on vendor specific  objective  evidence of fair
value for such  undelivered  elements.  Vendor  specific  objective  evidence is
typically  based on the price charged when an element is sold  separately or, if
an element is not sold  separately,  on the price  established  by an authorized


                                       35
<PAGE>


level of management,  if it is probable that the price, once  established,  will
not change before market introduction.  We use the residual method prescribed in
SOP 98-9,  "Modification of SOP 97-2,  Software Revenue Recognition With Respect
to Certain  Transaction" to allocate revenues to delivered  elements once it has
established   vendor-specific   objective   evidence  of  fair  value  for  such
undelivered elements.

Professional  consulting  services  are  billed  based on the number of hours of
consultant  services provided and the hourly billing rates. We recognize revenue
under these arrangements as the service is performed.

We adjust our accounts receivable balances that we deem to be uncollectible. The
allowance  for doubtful  accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable
credit losses in our existing accounts  receivable.  We review our allowance for
doubtful  accounts on a monthly  basis to determine  the  allowance  based on an
analysis of its past due  accounts.  All past due balances that are over 90 days
are reviewed  individually for collectability.  Account balances are charged off
against the allowance  after all means of collection have been exhausted and the
potential for recovery is considered  remote. An allowance for doubtful accounts
is not provided because in our opinion,  all accounts  recorded are deemed to be
collectible.

INCOME TAXES

We are required to determine the aggregate  amount of income tax expense or loss
based upon tax statutes in jurisdictions in which we conduct business. In making
these estimates,  we adjust our results  determined in accordance with generally
accepted  accounting  principles  for items that are treated  differently by the
applicable taxing authorities.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities, as a result
of  these  differences,  are  reflected  on  our  balance  sheet  for  temporary
differences  loss and credit  carry  forwards  that will  reverse in  subsequent
years. We also establish a valuation  allowance against deferred tax assets when
it is more likely than not that some or all of the  deferred tax assets will not
be realized.  Valuation  allowances  are based,  in part,  on  predictions  that
management must make as to our results in future periods.  The outcome of events
could differ over time which would  require us to make changes in our  valuation
allowance.

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

We account for Goodwill and  Intangible  Assets in accordance  with Statement of
Financial  Accounting  Standards ("SFAS") No. 141,  "Business  Combinations" and
SFAS No.  142,  "Goodwill  and Other  Intangible  Assets."  Under SFAS No.  142,
goodwill and intangibles  that are deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer
amortized but,  instead,  are to be reviewed at least  annually for  impairment.
Application of the goodwill  impairment  test requires  judgment,  including the
identification of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting
units,  assigning  goodwill to reporting  units, and determining the fair value.
Significant  judgments  required to estimate the fair value of  reporting  units
include estimating future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates and
other  assumptions.  Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially
affect the  determination  of fair value  and/or  goodwill  impairment  for each
reporting unit. During the year ended December, 31, 2005 we recorded $22,440,212
of  goodwill  in  connection  with  the  acquisitions  of  LucidLine,  CSSI  and
Entelagent.  In  accordance  with SFAS 142, we conducted  our annual  impairment
review of goodwill for the year ended  December 31,  2005,  which  resulted in a
goodwill  impairment  charge of $12,929,696 (Note 6). Intangible assets continue
to be amortized over their estimated useful lives.

We  engaged  an  outside  specialist  to assist us with  performing  our  annual
goodwill  impairment  tests.  These tests were made using a discounted cash flow
model  to  value  the  business.  This  approach  requires  us to  forecast  our
expectation  of  revenues  and cash flows in future  periods and to work with an
independent  specialist on developing assumptions relating to the risk that such
cash flows may or may not materialize in future periods.

SHARE BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for employee stock based  compensation in
accordance with Accounting  Principles  Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees." We applied the proforma disclosure  requirements
of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."


                                       36
<PAGE>


Effective  January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R "Share Based Payment." This
statement is a revision of SFAS  Statement No. 123, and  supersedes  APB Opinion
No. 25, and its related implementation  guidance.  SFAS 123R addresses all forms
of share based payment  ("SBP")  awards  including  shares issued under employee
stock purchase plans,  stock options,  restricted  stock and stock  appreciation
rights.  Under SFAS 123R,  SBP awards  result in a cost that is measured at fair
value on the awards' grant date,  based on the  estimated  number of awards that
are expected to vest. We adopted the modified prospective method with respect to
accounting  for  our  transition  to  SFAS  123(R)  and  measured   unrecognized
compensation cost. Under this method of accounting,  we are required to estimate
the  fair  value  of  share  based  payments  that we make to our  employees  by
developing  assumptions  regarding  expected  holding  terms of  stock  options,
volatility  rates and  expectation  of  forfeitures  and future vesting that can
significantly  impact the amount of compensation  cost that we recognize in each
reporting period.

We are also  required to apply  complex  accounting  principles  with respect to
accounting  for  financing  transactions  that we have  consummated  in order to
sustain our business. These transactions, which generally consist of convertible
debt and equity instruments,  require us to use significant judgment in order to
assess the fair values of these instruments at their dates of issuance, which is
critical to making a reasonable  presentation  of our financing costs and how we
finance our business.

Formulating  estimates  in  any of  the  above  areas  requires  us to  exercise
significant  judgment.  It is at least reasonably possible that the estimates of
the effect on the  financial  statements  of a condition,  situation,  or set of
circumstances  that  existed  at the date of the  financial  statements  that we
considered in formulating our estimates could change in the near term due to one
or more future  confirming  events.  Accordingly,  the actual results  regarding
estimates  of any of the  above  items as they are  presented  in the  financial
statements could differ materially from our estimates.


                              RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS  ENDED MARCH 31, 2006  COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2005.

For the three months ended March 31, 2006, our consolidated revenues amounted to
$261,785  compared  to $6,430 for the three  months  ended March 31,  2005.  The
increase is the result of business combinations that we consummated with CSSI in
February 2005 and Entelagent in March 2005.

Cost of Sales for the three  months  ended  March 31,  2006  amounted to $57,419
compared to $21,233 for the three  months  ended March 31,  2005.  Cost of sales
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 includes $27,522
and  $19,230,  respectively,  associated  with  the  amortization  of  developed
technology that we acquired from CSSI and Entelagent.

Operating  expenses  amounted to $1,118,826 for the three months ended March 31,
2006 as compared to  $1,610,877  for the three  months  ended March 31,  2005, a
decrease of $492,051. The decrease in operating expenses includes an increase of
approximately $466,000 for salaries associated with an increase in the number of
employees from acquired  businesses,  an increase of approximately  $517,000 for
legal and professional fees that we incurred  principally in connection with the
year-end  financial  audit,  the  negotiation  and  settlement  of various legal
matters under the creditor and claimant  liabilities  restructuring  program and
the  implementation  of  the  Series  A  Preferred  Financing,  an  increase  of
approximately  $23,000  for  amortization  of  acquired  intangible  assets,  an
increase  of  approximately  $173,000  associated  with the  expensing  of stock
options,  an increase of  approximately  $3,000  associated  with a  stock-based
penalty  under  a   collateralized   financing   arrangement   and  an  increase
approximately   $65,000  for  increased  general  and  administrative   expenses
associated with the acquired  businesses.  These increases were offset by a gain
of  approximately   $907,000  associated  with  the  settlement  of  outstanding
liabilities,  claims and litigation under the creditor and claimant  liabilities
restructuring,  an approximately  $464,000  reduction in expense associated with
the  amortization of stock-based  compensation  arrangements  and  approximately
$369,000  reduction  in  expense  associated  with  a  penalty  provision  of an
Accommodation Agreement.

Our consolidated  loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006
amounted to $914,460  compared  to a loss of  $1,625,680  for the same period in
2005.  Our loss was reduced as a result of the  increases in operating  expenses
offset by the gain on the  settlement  of the creditor and claimant  liabilities
restructuring discussed above.


                                       37
<PAGE>


Interest  expense  during the three  months  ended  March 31,  2006  amounted to
$972,464 as compared to $494,998 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.  The
increase  is  directly  related to our  issuance  of Series A  Preferred  stock,
issuances of notes and the increased borrowings that we made to fund our working
capital needs and to finance our acquisitions of CSSI, LucidLine and Entelagent.
Non-cash interest  relating to the amortization of deferred  financing costs and
the  accretion  of debt  discounts  during the three months ended March 31, 2006
amounted to approximately  $303,038 compared to $414,485 in same period in 2005.
The intrinsic value of the conversion option for bridge note holders,  which has
been  classified as interest  expense  amounted to $192,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 compared to $0 in the same period in 2005.  Amortization of
deferred  finance  charges which have been  classified  as interest  expense was
approximately  $282,129 in the three  months  ended  March 31, 2006  compared to
$153,520  in the same period in 2005.  Accretion  of debt  discounts  during the
three  months  ended  March 31,  2006 were  approximately  $20,909  compared  to
$260,965 in the same period in 2005.  Interest income, was $0 and $19,250 in the
three  months  ended  March 31,  2006 and 2005,  respectively.  Interest  income
represents  the interest  earned from loans that we made to Entelagent  prior to
our acquisition of that business on March 30, 2005.

For the three  months  ended  March 31,  2006,  the net loss was  $1,991,824  or
$(0.96)  per share on  2,083,954  weighted  average  common  shares  outstanding
compared to a net loss of $2,203,795 or $(1.30) per share on 1,689,558  weighted
average common shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2005.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We incurred a net loss of $1,991,824  for the three months ended March 31, 2006,
which includes  $797,921 of non-cash  charges  associated with the fair value of
common stock we issued as penalties under certain registration rights agreements
($2,852),  fair value of a  conversion  option in  connection  with  bridge note
holders  ($192,000),  accretion  related to warrants issued in conjunction  with
notes payable  ($20,909),  amortization of deferred  financing costs ($282,129),
non-cash  increase  in  interest  payable  to a  former  stockholder  ($48,400),
depreciation  and  amortization   ($70,796),   and  a  charge  for  stock  based
compensation  ($180,835).  These non-cash charges were offset by a non-cash gain
on issuance of preferred stock in settlement of debt totaling $906,987.  We also
used $957,122 of our  restricted  cash escrowed to settle  liabilities  assumed.
Including the amounts above, we used net cash flows in our operating  activities
of $3,454,807  during the three months ended March 31, 2006. Our working capital
deficiency  at March 31, 2006 amounts to  $5,659,898  and we are  continuing  to
experience  shortages in working capital.  We are involved in litigation and are
being  investigated  by the Securities and Exchange  Commission  with respect to
certain  of our press  releases  and our use of form S-8 to  register  shares of
common stock that we issued to certain  consultants in prior periods.  We cannot
provide any assurance that the outcome of these matters will not have a material
adverse  affect on our  ability to sustain the  business.  These  matters  raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We expect to continue  incurring  losses for the  foreseeable  future due to the
inherent uncertainty that is related to establishing the commercial  feasibility
of  technological  products  and  developing  a  presence  in new  markets.  The
Company's ability to successfully  integrate the acquired businesses is critical
to the realization of its business plan. We raised  $4,285,501 of gross proceeds
($3,946,451 net proceeds after the payment of certain  transaction  expenses) in
financing  transactions  during the three months  ended March 31, 2006.  We used
$3,454,807  of these  proceeds to fund its  operations  and a net of $225,228 in
investing  activities,  principally for the purchase and development of software
technology. Additionally, we made $125,000 in legal payments associated with the
settlement  of  accommodation   agreements  and  incurred  $54,000  in  deferred
financing costs.  Subsequent to March 31, 2006 we raised approximately  $355,000
in additional gross funds in the Series A Preferred Financing (Note 18).

We are currently in the process of attempting  to raise  additional  capital and
have  taken  certain  steps to  conserve  our  liquidity  while we  continue  to
integrate  the acquired  businesses.  Although we believe that we have access to
capital resources,  we have not secured any commitments for additional financing
at this time nor can we provide any assurance  that we will be successful in our
efforts to raise  additional  capital and/or  successfully  execute our business
plan. In an effort to secure additional financing, we have offered our creditors
and claimants an agreement to issue common stock for amounts owed to the holders
of our indebtedness (including lenders,  past-due trade accounts, and employees,
consultants and other service providers with claims for fees, wages or expenses)
(Note 17).


                                       38
<PAGE>


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

At  March  31,  2006,  we did not  have any  relationships  with  unconsolidated
entities  or  financial  partnerships,  such as  entities  often  referred to as
structured finance,  variable interest or special purpose entities,  which would
have  been  established  for  the  purpose  of  facilitating  off-balance  sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.  As such, we are
not exposed to any financing,  liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise
if we had engaged in such relationships.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS

The risks noted below and  elsewhere  in this report and in other  documents  we
file  with the SEC are risks  and  uncertainties  that  could  cause our  actual
results   to  differ   materially   from  the   results   contemplated   by  the
forward-looking  statements contained in this report and other public statements
we make.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN.

We  currently  have a number of  obligations  that we are unable to meet without
generating  additional  revenues  or  raising  additional  capital.  We are also
subject to  substantial  litigation  and an  investigation  by the SEC described
elsewhere herein. If we cannot generate  additional revenues or raise additional
capital in the near future, we may become  insolvent.  As of March 31, 2006, our
cash balance was $141,430 and we had a working  capital  deficit of  $5,659,898.
This raises  substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Historically,  we have  funded  our  capital  requirements  with debt and equity
financing.  Our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing depends on
a  number  of  factors  including  our  financial  performance  and the  overall
conditions in our industry.  If we are not able to raise additional financing or
if such financing is not available on acceptable terms, we may liquidate assets,
seek or be  forced  into  bankruptcy,  and/or  continue  operations  but  suffer
material harm to our  operations and financial  condition.  These measures could
have a material adverse affect on our ability to continue as a going concern.

We are  attempting  to  restructure  any and all claims,  liabilities,  demands,
causes of action, costs, expenses,  attorneys' fees, damages,  indemnities,  and
obligations  of every kind and nature that certain  creditors  and claimants may
have with us pursuant to the  creditor and  claimant  liabilities  restructuring
described  in Note 17. Our failure to  successfully  complete  the  creditor and
claimant  liabilities  restructuring could adversely impact our ability to raise
additional financing,  or could force us to liquidate assets, or seek bankruptcy
protection.  There can be no assurance  that we will  successfully  complete the
creditor and claimant liabilities restructuring. Such a failure could materially
adversely affect our ability to continue as a going concern.

INVESTORS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY  EVALUATE OUR BUSINESS AND PROSPECTS DUE
TO OUR  LIMITED  OPERATING  HISTORY,  LACK  OF  REVENUES  AND  LACK  OF  PRODUCT
OFFERINGS.

We are at an early stage of executing  our business  plan and have no history of
offering information security capabilities.  We were incorporated in Delaware in
2002. Significant business operations only began with the acquisitions completed
in  February  and March  2005.  As a result of our  limited  history,  it may be
difficult to plan operating  expenses or forecast our revenues  accurately.  Our
assumptions about customer or network requirements may be wrong. The revenue and
income  potential of these  products is unproven,  and the markets  addressed by
these  products are volatile.  If such products are not  successful,  our actual
operating  results  could be below  our  expectations  and the  expectations  of
investors and market analysts,  which would likely cause the price of our common
stock to decline.

We  generated  no revenue  from  operations  before  December  31, 2004 and only
limited  revenues  in the year  ended  December  31,  2005.  We have  relied  on
financing   generated   from  our  capital   raising   activities  to  fund  the
implementation  of our business plan. We have incurred  operating and net losses
and negative cash flows from  operations  since our  inception.  As of March 31,
2006, we had an  accumulated  deficit of  approximately  $86.4  million.  We may
continue to incur  operating  and net losses,  due in part to  implementing  our
acquisitions  strategy,  engaging in financing  activities  and expansion of our


                                       39
<PAGE>


personnel and our business  development  capabilities.  We will continue to seek
financing for the acquisition of other acquisition  targets that we may identify
in the future.  We continue to believe that we will secure financing in the near
future, but there can be no assurance of our success. If we are unable to obtain
the  necessary  funding,  it will  materially  adversely  affect our  ability to
execute our business plan and to continue our operations.

In addition, we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability,  and, even
if we do  achieve  profitability,  the  level  of any  profitability  cannot  be
predicted and may vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

THERE CAN BE NO GUARANTY  THAT A MARKET WILL  DEVELOP FOR THE PRODUCTS WE INTEND
TO OFFER.

We currently have a limited offering of products.  We intend to acquire products
through the acquisition of existing businesses. There is no guarantee,  however,
that a market will develop for Internet security solutions of the type we intend
to  offer.  We cannot  predict  the size of the  market  for  Internet  security
solutions,  the rate at which the  market  will  grow,  or  whether  our  target
customers will accept our acquired products.

OUR  OPERATING  RESULTS  MAY  FLUCTUATE  SIGNIFICANTLY,   WHICH  MAY  RESULT  IN
VOLATILITY OR HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

The  market  prices  of the  securities  of  technology-related  companies  have
historically  been  volatile and may continue to be volatile.  Thus,  the market
price of our common stock is likely to be subject to wide  fluctuations.  If our
revenues do not grow or grow more slowly than we  anticipate,  if  operating  or
capital   expenditures   exceed   our   expectations   and   cannot  be  reduced
appropriately,  or if some other event adversely affects us, the market price of
our common stock could decline.  Only a small public market currently exists for
our common stock and the number of shares eligible for sale in the public market
is currently  very limited,  but is expected to increase.  Sales of  substantial
shares in the future would depress the price of our common  stock.  In addition,
we currently do not receive any stock market research coverage by any recognized
stock  market  research  or  trading  firm and our  shares are not traded on any
national  securities  exchange.  A larger and more active  market for our common
stock may not develop.

Because of our limited  operations  history  and lack of assets and  revenues to
date, our common stock is believed to be currently  trading on speculation  that
we will be successful in implementing  our  acquisition  and growth  strategies.
There can be no assurance  that such  success  will be achieved.  The failure to
implement our acquisitions  and growth  strategies would likely adversely affect
the  market  price  of  our  common  stock.  In  addition,  if  the  market  for
technology-related stocks or the stock market in general experiences a continued
or greater loss in investor  confidence or otherwise  fails, the market price of
our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, results of
operations  and financial  condition.  The market price of our common stock also
might decline in reaction to events that affect other  companies in our industry
even if these events do not directly  affect us.  General  political or economic
conditions, such as an outbreak of war, a recession or interest rate or currency
rate  fluctuations,  could also cause the  market  price of our common  stock to
decline.  Our  common  stock  has  experienced,  and is likely  to  continue  to
experience, these fluctuations in price, regardless of our performance.

WE ARE  CURRENTLY  SUBJECT  TO AN SEC  INVESTIGATION  WHICH  COULD  LEAD  TO THE
IMPOSITION OF SIGNIFICANT CIVIL PENALTIES AND COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY
TO SELL OUR SECURITIES AND/OR HAVE OUR SECURITIES REGISTERED WITH THE SEC AND/OR
VARIOUS STATES IF THE SEC BRINGS AN ACTION AGAINST US.

Pursuant  to  Section  20(a)  of the  Securities  Act and  Section  21(a) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange  Act"), the staff of
the SEC (the "Staff"),  issued an order (In the Matter of Patron Systems, Inc. -
Order  Directing  a  Private  Investigation  and  Designating  Officers  to Take
Testimony  (C-03739-A,   February  12,  2004))  (the  "Order")  that  a  private
investigation (the "SEC  Investigation") be made to determine whether certain of
our actions and certain of the actions of our officers and  directors and others
(as described below) violated Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act and/or
Section 10 and Rule 10b-5  promulgated  under the Exchange Act.  Generally,  the
Order  provides,  among other things,  that the Staff is  investigating  (i) the
legality of two (2) separate  Registration  Statements  filed by us on Form S-8,
filed on December 20, 2002 and on April 2, 2003, as amended on


                                       40
<PAGE>


April 9, 2003 (collectively, the "Registration Statements"), covering the resale
of, in the  aggregate,  145,834  shares of common stock issued to various of our
consultants,  and (ii) whether in connection with the purchase or sale of shares
of common stock,  certain of our officers,  directors and others (a) sold common
stock  in  violation  of  Section  5 of the  Securities  Act  and/or,  (b)  made
misrepresentations and/or omissions of material facts and/or employed fraudulent
devices in connection  with such  purchases  and/or sales relating to certain of
our  press  releases  regarding,   among  other  items,   proposed  mergers  and
acquisitions  that were never  consummated.  If the SEC brings an action against
us, it could  result in,  among  other  items,  a civil  injunctive  order or an
administrative  cease-and-desist  order being entered against us, in addition to
the imposition of a significant civil penalty.  Moreover,  the SEC Investigation
and/or a subsequent  SEC action could affect  adversely  our ability to have our
common stock listed on a stock exchange  and/or quoted on The OTC Bulletin Board
or  NASDAQ,  our  ability  to sell our  securities  and/or  have our  securities
registered with the SEC and/or in various states and/or our ability to implement
our business  plan. To date, our legal counsel  representing  us in such matters
has  indicated  that the SEC  Investigation  is  ongoing  and the  Staff has not
indicated  whether  it  will  or will  not  recommend  that  the  SEC  bring  an
enforcement action against us, our officers, directors and/or others.

THE  CONCENTRATION  OF OUR CAPITAL  STOCK  OWNERSHIP  WITH INSIDERS IS LIKELY TO
LIMIT THE ABILITY OF OTHER STOCKHOLDERS TO INFLUENCE CORPORATE MATTERS.

As of May 11, 2006, the executive  officers,  directors and entities  affiliated
with  any  of  them  together  beneficially  owned  approximately  16.7%  of our
outstanding  common  stock.  As a  result,  these  stockholders  may be  able to
exercise control over matters requiring approval by our stockholders,  including
the election of directors and approval of  significant  corporate  transactions.
This  concentration  of  ownership  might  also have the effect of  delaying  or
preventing a change in our control that might be viewed as  beneficial  by other
stockholders.

FUTURE SALES OF SHARES BY EXISTING  STOCKHOLDERS  COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO
DECLINE.

If our  existing  or  future  stockholders  sell,  or  are  perceived  to  sell,
substantial  amounts of our common stock in the public market,  the market price
of our common  stock could  decline.  As of May 11, 2006,  there were  1,879,946
shares  of  common  stock  outstanding,  of which  314,498  shares  were held by
directors,  executive  officers  and  other  affiliates,  the sale of which  are
subject to volume limitations under Rule 144, various vesting agreements and our
quarterly  and  other  "blackout"  periods.   Furthermore,   shares  subject  to
outstanding  options and warrants and shares  reserved for future issuance under
our stock option plan will become  eligible for sale in the public market to the
extent  permitted by the provisions of various vesting  agreements,  the lock-up
arrangements and Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

THE  UNPREDICTABILITY  OF AN ACQUIRED COMPANY'S  QUARTERLY RESULTS MAY CAUSE THE
TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK TO DECLINE.

The quarterly  revenues and  operating  results of companies we may acquire will
likely continue to vary in the future due to a number of factors,  many of which
are outside of our control.  Any of these  factors  could cause the price of our
common stock to decline. The primary factors that may affect future revenues and
future operating results include the following:

         o        the demand for our subsidiaries' current product offerings and
                  our future products;

         o        the length of sales cycles;

         o        the timing of recognizing revenues;

         o        new product introductions by us or our competitors;

         o        changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our
                  competitors;

         o        variations in sales channels, product costs or mix of products
                  sold;

         o        our ability to develop,  introduce and ship in a timely manner
                  new  products  and  product  enhancements  that meet  customer
                  requirements;

         o        our ability to obtain  sufficient  supplies of sole or limited
                  source components for our products;

         o        variations in the prices of the components we purchase;


                                       41
<PAGE>


         o        our  ability to attain and  maintain  production  volumes  and
                  quality  levels for our products at  reasonable  prices at our
                  third-party manufacturers;

         o        our ability to manage our customer base and credit risk and to
                  collect our accounts receivable; and

         o        the  financial  strength  of  our  value-added  resellers  and
                  distributors.

Our  operating  expenses are largely  based on  anticipated  revenues and a high
percentage  of our  expenses  are,  and will  continue to be, fixed in the short
term. As a result,  lower than  anticipated  revenues for any reason could cause
significant  variations  in our  operating  results from quarter to quarter and,
because of our rapidly growing operating  expenses,  could result in substantial
operating losses.

OUR  COMMON  STOCK  IS  SUBJECT  TO THE  SEC'S  PENNY  STOCK  RULES.  THEREFORE,
BROKER-DEALERS MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTY IN COMPLETING CUSTOMER TRANSACTIONS AND
TRADING ACTIVITY IN OUR SECURITIES MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

If at any time a company has net tangible  assets of  $5,000,000 or less and the
common  stock has a market price per share of less than $5.00,  transactions  in
the common stock may be subject to the "penny stock" rules promulgated under the
Exchange Act. Under these rules, broker-dealers who recommend such securities to
persons other than institutional accredited investors must:

         o        make a  special  written  suitability  determination  for  the
                  purchaser;

         o        receive the  purchaser's  written  agreement to a  transaction
                  prior to sale;

         o        provide the purchaser  with risk  disclosure  documents  which
                  identify  certain risks  associated  with  investing in "penny
                  stocks" and which describe the market for these "penny stocks"
                  as well as a purchaser's legal remedies; and

         o        obtain a signed and dated  acknowledgment  from the  purchaser
                  demonstrating  that the  purchaser  has actually  received the
                  required risk  disclosure  document  before a transaction in a
                  "penny stock" can be completed.

If our common stock becomes subject to these rules,  broker-dealers  may find it
difficult  to  effectuate  customer  transactions  and  trading  activity in our
securities  may be  adversely  affected.  As a result,  the market  price of our
securities may be depressed, and stockholders may find it more difficult to sell
their shares of our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE ACQUIRED BUSINESSES.

Our business plan is dependent upon the acquisition and integration of companies
that have previously operated independently.  To date we have experienced delays
in  implementing  our business  plan as a result of limited  capital  resources,
which have had a material adverse effect on our business.  Further delays in the
process of integrating  could cause an interruption  of, or loss of momentum in,
the activities of our business and the loss of key  personnel.  The diversion of
management's attention and any delays or difficulties  encountered in connection
with our integration of acquired  operations could have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects.

WE CURRENTLY DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT  REVENUES TO SUPPORT OUR BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
AND IF OPERATING LOSSES CONTINUE,  WILL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
THROUGH FINANCINGS WHICH WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SECURE.

To achieve our intended growth, we will require substantial  additional capital.
We have  encountered  difficulty  and delays in raising  capital to date and the
market   environment  for  development  stage  companies,   like  ours,  remains
particularly challenging. There can be no assurance that funds will be available
when  needed or on  acceptable  terms.  Technology  companies  in  general  have
experienced  difficulty in recent years in accessing  capital.  Our inability to
obtain  additional  financing  may require us to delay,  scale back or eliminate
certain of our growth  plans which could have a material  and adverse  effect on
our business,  financial condition or results of operations or could cause us to
cease  operations.  Even if we are able to  obtain  additional  financing,  such
financing  could be  structured  as  equity  financing  that  would  dilute  the
ownership percentage of any investor in our securities.


                                       42
<PAGE>


DOWNTURNS IN THE INTERNET  INFRASTRUCTURE,  NETWORK SECURITY AND RELATED MARKETS
MAY DECREASE OUR REVENUES AND MARGINS.

The  market  for our  current  products  and other  products  we intend to offer
depends on economic  conditions  affecting the broader Internet  infrastructure,
network  security  and related  markets.  Downturns  in these  markets may cause
enterprises  and  carriers to delay or cancel  security  projects,  reduce their
overall or security-specific  information technology budgets or reduce or cancel
orders for our current  products and other products we intend to offer.  In this
environment, customers such as distributors,  value-added resellers and carriers
may  experience  financial  difficulty,  cease  operations and fail to budget or
reduce  budgets for the  purchase of our current  products or other  products we
intend to offer.  This,  in turn,  may lead to longer  sales  cycles,  delays in
purchase  decisions,  payment  and  collection,  and may  also  result  in price
pressures,  causing us to realize  lower  revenues,  gross margins and operating
margins.  In  addition,   general  economic   uncertainty  caused  by  potential
hostilities involving the United States,  terrorist  activities,  the decline in
specific markets such as the service  provider market in the United States,  and
the general  decline in capital  spending in the information  technology  sector
make it difficult to predict changes in the purchase and network requirements of
our potential  customers and the markets we intend to serve. We believe that, in
light of these events, some businesses may curtail or eliminate capital spending
on  information  technology.  A decline in capital  spending  in the  markets we
intend to serve may  adversely  affect our future  revenues,  gross  margins and
operating margins and make it necessary for us to gain significant  market share
from our future  competitors in order to achieve our financial goals and achieve
profitability.

COMPETITION MAY DECREASE OUR PROJECTED REVENUES, MARKET SHARE AND MARGINS.

The market for network security  products is highly  competitive,  and we expect
competition  to intensify in the future.  Competitors  may gain market share and
introduce new competitive  products for the same markets and customers we intend
to serve with our products.  These products may have better  performance,  lower
prices and broader  acceptance than the products we currently offer or intend to
offer.

Many of our potential competitors have longer operating histories,  greater name
recognition,   large  customer  bases  and  significantly   greater   financial,
technical,  sales, marketing and other resources than we have. In addition, some
of our  potential  competitors  currently  combine  their  products  with  other
companies'  networking and security products.  These potential  competitors also
often combine their sales and marketing  efforts.  Such activities may result in
reduced  prices,  lower gross and operating  margins and longer sales cycles for
the  products  we  currently  offer and  intend to offer.  If any of our  larger
potential  competitors were to commit greater  technical,  sales,  marketing and
other  resources to the markets we intend to serve,  or reduce  prices for their
products over a sustained  period of time, our ability to successfully  sell the
products  we intend to offer,  increase  revenue or meet our or market  analysts
expectations could be adversely affected.

FAILURE TO ADDRESS  EVOLVING  STANDARDS  IN THE NETWORK  SECURITY  INDUSTRY  AND
SUCCESSFULLY  DEVELOP AND INTRODUCE NEW PRODUCTS OR PRODUCT  ENHANCEMENTS  WOULD
CAUSE OUR REVENUES TO DECLINE.

The market for network security products is characterized by rapid technological
change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and
evolving   industry   standards.   We  expect  to  introduce  our  products  and
enhancements  to existing  products to address  current  and  evolving  customer
requirements and broader networking trends and  vulnerabilities.  We also expect
to develop products with strategic partners and incorporate third-party advanced
security  capabilities  into  our  intended  product  offerings.  Some of  these
products and enhancements  may require us to develop new hardware  architectures
that involve complex and time consuming processes. In developing and introducing
our  intended  product  offerings,  we have  made,  and will  continue  to make,
assumptions with respect to which features,  security  standards and performance
criteria will be required by our potential customers.  If we implement features,
security  standards  and  performance  criteria  that are  different  from those
required by our potential  customers,  market acceptance of our intended product
offerings may be significantly reduced or delayed,  which would harm our ability
to penetrate existing or new markets.

Furthermore,  we may not be able to develop new products or product enhancements
in a timely  manner,  or at all. Any failure to develop or  introduce  these new
products and product enhancements might cause our existing products


                                       43
<PAGE>


to be less  competitive,  may adversely  affect our ability to sell solutions to
address large customer  deployments  and, as a consequence,  our revenues may be
adversely  affected.  In addition,  the  introduction of products  embodying new
technologies  could render existing products we intend to offer obsolete,  which
would  have a direct,  adverse  effect on our  market  share and  revenues.  Any
failure  of our  future  products  or product  enhancements  to  achieve  market
acceptance  could cause our revenues to decline and our operating  results to be
below our  expectations  and the  expectations of investors and market analysts,
which would likely cause the price of our common stock to decline.

WE HAVE EXPERIENCED ISSUES WITH OUR FINANCIAL  SYSTEMS,  CONTROLS AND OPERATIONS
THAT COULD HARM OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Our ability to sell our intended  product  offerings  and implement our business
plan successfully in a volatile and growing market requires effective management
and financial systems and a system of financial processes and controls.  Through
the quarter  ended  December 31, 2005,  our Chief  Executive  Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure  controls
and  procedures  in  accordance  with  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15 or 15d-15 and
identified material weakness in our internal controls. These material weaknesses
affected  our ability to timely file our  reports  with the SEC and  communicate
critical  information to management that was needed to make business  decisions.
Although  we have taken steps to correct  these  previous  deficiencies  and are
currently in compliance with the SEC's reporting  requirements,  we have limited
capital  resources  and are still at risk for the loss of key  personnel  in our
finance department.  The loss of key personnel in our finance department, or any
other  conditions  that could disrupt our operations in this area,  could have a
material  adverse affect on our ability to communicate  critical  information to
management and our investors,  raise capital and/or maintain compliance with our
SEC reporting  obligations.  These  circumstances,  if they arise,  could have a
material adverse affect on our business.

We have  limited  management  resources to date and are still  establishing  our
management and financial systems.  Growth, to the extent it occurs, is likely to
place a considerable strain on our management resources,  systems, processes and
controls.  To address  these  issues,  we will need to  continue  to improve our
financial and managerial  controls,  reporting systems and procedures,  and will
need to continue to expand, train and manage our work force worldwide. If we are
unable to maintain an adequate level of financial processes and controls, we may
not be able to accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis and
our business and stock price would be harmed.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE  TO  IMPLEMENT  SECTION  404 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT ON A
TIMELY BASIS.

The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, adopted
rules generally  requiring each public company to include a report of management
on the company's internal controls over financial reporting in its annual report
on Form 10-KSB that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness of
the company's internal controls over financial  reporting  beginning in the year
ended  December 31, 2007.  In addition,  the  company's  independent  registered
accounting  firm must  attest to and report on  management's  assessment  of the
effectiveness of the company's internal controls over financial reporting.  This
requirement  will first apply to our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year  ending  December  31,  2008.  We have  not yet  developed  a  Section  404
implementation  plan.  We have in the  past  discovered,  and may in the  future
discover,  areas of our internal controls that need  improvement.  How companies
should be implementing these new requirements including internal control reforms
to comply with Section  404's  requirements  and how  independent  auditors will
apply  these  requirements  and  test  companies'  internal  controls,  is still
reasonably  uncertain.  We  expect  that  we may  need  to  hire  and/or  engage
additional  personnel and incur  incremental costs in order to complete the work
required by Section 404. We can not guarantee that we will be able to complete a
Section 404 plan on a timely basis.  Additionally,  upon completion of a Section
404  plan,  we may  not be able to  conclude  that  our  internal  controls  are
effective,  or in the event that we  conclude  that our  internal  controls  are
effective,  our independent accountants may disagree with our assessment and may
issue a report that is  qualified.  Any  failure to  implement  required  new or
improved controls, or difficulties  encountered in their  implementation,  could
negatively  affect  our  operating  results  or  cause  us to fail  to meet  our
reporting obligations.

IF OUR FUTURE  PRODUCTS DO NOT  INTEROPERATE  WITH OUR END CUSTOMERS'  NETWORKS,
INSTALLATIONS WOULD BE DELAYED OR CANCELLED,  WHICH COULD  SIGNIFICANTLY  REDUCE
OUR ANTICIPATED REVENUES.


                                       44
<PAGE>


Future  products will be designed to interface with our end customers'  existing
networks,  each of which have  different  specifications  and  utilize  multiple
protocol standards. Many end customers' networks contain multiple generations of
products  that  have  been  added  over time as these  networks  have  grown and
evolved.  Our future products must  interoperate with all of the products within
these  networks  as well as with  future  products  that might be added to these
networks in order to meet end customers' requirements.  If we find errors in the
existing  software used in our end customers'  networks,  we may elect to modify
our  software  to fix or  overcome  these  errors  so  that  our  products  will
interoperate and scale with their existing software and hardware.  If our future
products do not  interoperate  with those  within our end  customers'  networks,
installations  could be delayed or orders for our products  could be  cancelled,
which could significantly reduce our anticipated revenues.

AS A PUBLIC  COMPANY,  WE MAY  INCUR  INCREASED  COSTS AS A RESULT  OF  RECENTLY
ENACTED AND  PROPOSED  CHANGES IN LAWS AND  REGULATIONS  RELATING  TO  CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE MATTERS AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

Recently  enacted and  proposed  changes in the laws and  regulations  affecting
public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
rules adopted or proposed by the SEC will result in increased costs for us as we
evaluate the  implications of these laws,  regulations and standards and respond
to their  requirements.  In  addition,  we will become  subject to the  internal
control reporting requirement specified in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 beginning in the year ended December 31, 2007,  which will require us to
expend substantial  financial  resources in order to become compliant with these
requirements.  These laws and  regulations  could make it more difficult or more
costly for us to obtain  certain  types of  insurance,  including  director  and
officer  liability  insurance,  and we may be forced to  accept  reduced  policy
limits and  coverage or incur  substantially  higher costs to obtain the same or
similar  coverage.  The impact of these events could also make it more difficult
for us to  attract  and  retain  qualified  persons  to  serve  on our  board of
directors,  board  committees or as executive  officers.  We cannot estimate the
amount or timing of additional  costs we may incur as a result of these laws and
regulations.

WE DEPEND ON OUR KEY PERSONNEL TO MANAGE OUR BUSINESS  EFFECTIVELY  IN A RAPIDLY
CHANGING  MARKET,  AND IF WE ARE UNABLE TO HIRE  ADDITIONAL  PERSONNEL OR RETAIN
EXISTING  PERSONNEL,  OUR  ABILITY TO EXECUTE  OUR  BUSINESS  STRATEGY  WOULD BE
IMPAIRED.

Our  future  success  depends  upon  the  continued  services  of our  executive
officers. The loss of the services of any of our key employees, the inability to
attract  or  retain  qualified  personnel  in the  future,  or  delays in hiring
required  personnel,  could  delay the  development  and  introduction  of,  and
negatively impact our ability to sell, our intended product offerings.

WE MIGHT HAVE TO DEFEND  LAWSUITS OR PAY DAMAGES IN CONNECTION  WITH ANY ALLEGED
OR ACTUAL FAILURE OF OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES.

Because our intended product  offerings and services provide and monitor network
security and may protect valuable information,  we could face claims for product
liability,  tort or breach of  warranty.  Anyone who  circumvents  our  security
measures could misappropriate the confidential  information or other property of
end  customers  using our  products,  or  interrupt  their  operations.  If that
happens,  affected  end  customers  or others may sue us.  Defending  a lawsuit,
regardless of its merit, could be costly and could divert management  attention.
Our business  liability  insurance coverage may be inadequate or future coverage
may be unavailable on acceptable terms or at all.

WE COULD BECOME SUBJECT TO LITIGATION  REGARDING  INTELLECTUAL  PROPERTY  RIGHTS
THAT COULD BE COSTLY AND RESULT IN THE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT RIGHTS.

In recent  years,  there has been  significant  litigation  in the United States
involving patents and other intellectual  property rights. We may become a party
to litigation in the future to protect our intellectual  property or as a result
of an alleged infringement of another party's intellectual property.  Claims for
alleged infringement and any resulting lawsuit, if successful,  could subject us
to significant liability for damages and invalidation of our proprietary rights.
These lawsuits,  regardless of their success, would likely be time-consuming and


                                       45
<PAGE>


expensive  to  resolve  and would  divert  management  time and  attention.  Any
potential intellectual property litigation could also force us to do one or more
of the following:

         o        stop or delay  selling,  incorporating  or using products that
                  use the challenged intellectual property; and/or

         o        obtain from the owner of the infringed  intellectual  property
                  right a license to sell or use the relevant technology,  which
                  license might not be available on reasonable  terms or at all;
                  or redesign the products that use that technology.

If we are forced to take any of these  actions,  our business might be seriously
harmed.  Our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be
adequate to indemnify us for all liability that could be imposed.

THE INABILITY TO OBTAIN ANY THIRD-PARTY LICENSE REQUIRED TO DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS
AND PRODUCT  ENHANCEMENTS  COULD REQUIRE US TO OBTAIN  SUBSTITUTE  TECHNOLOGY OF
LOWER QUALITY OR PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR AT GREATER COST, WHICH COULD SERIOUSLY
HARM OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

From time to time, we may be required to license  technology  from third parties
to develop new products or product enhancements. Third-party licenses may not be
available to us on  commercially  reasonable  terms or at all. Our  inability to
obtain any  third-party  license  required  to develop  new  products or product
enhancements  could require us to obtain substitute  technology of lower quality
or  performance  standards or at greater cost,  which could  seriously  harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.


                                       42
<PAGE>


GOVERNMENTAL  REGULATIONS  AFFECTING  THE  IMPORT OR EXPORT  OF  PRODUCTS  COULD
NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR REVENUES.

Governmental  regulation  of imports  or  exports or failure to obtain  required
export approval of our encryption  technologies could harm our international and
domestic sales.  The United States and various foreign  governments have imposed
controls,  export license  requirements and restrictions on the import or export
of some technologies,  especially encryption technology.  In addition, from time
to time, governmental agencies have proposed additional regulation of encryption
technology,  such as requiring the escrow and  governmental  recovery of private
encryption keys.

In particular,  in light of recent terrorist  activity,  governments could enact
additional regulation or restrictions on the use, import or export of encryption
technology.  Additional  regulation  of  encryption  technology  could  delay or
prevent the  acceptance and use of encryption  products and public  networks for
secure  communications.  This might  decrease  demand for our  intended  product
offerings and services.  In addition,  some foreign  competitors  are subject to
less stringent controls on exporting their encryption technologies. As a result,
they may be able to compete  more  effectively  than we can in the  domestic and
international network security market.

MANAGEMENT COULD INVEST OR SPEND OUR CASH OR CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS IN
WAYS THAT MIGHT NOT ENHANCE OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR MARKET SHARE.

We have  made no  specific  allocations  of our  cash  or cash  equivalents  and
investments.  Consequently,  management  will  retain a  significant  amount  of
discretion over the application of our cash or cash  equivalents and investments
and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our  operating  results
or increase our market share. In addition, these proceeds may not be invested to
yield a favorable rate of return.


                                       46
<PAGE>


                          PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

See attached Exhibit Index.


                                       47
<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.


Date: May 21, 2007               PATRON SYSTEMS, INC.
                                 --------------------
                                 (Registrant)



                                 /S/ BRADEN WAVERLEY
                                 ------------------------------
                                 By:    Braden Waverley
                                 Its:   Chief Executive Officer



                                 /S/ MARTIN T. JOHNSON
                                 ------------------------------
                                 By:    Martin T. Johnson
                                 Its:   Chief Financial Officer


                                       48
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


  EXHIBIT
  NUMBER                         DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
 -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   10.1   Form of Stock  Subscription  Agreement  and Mutual  Release  issued by
          Patron  Systems,  Inc.  in  favor  of  each  of the  Creditors  and/or
          Claimants  exchanging  claims for  shares of the Series A-1  Preferred
          Stock of Patron  Systems,  Inc.  Incorporated  by reference to Exhibit
          10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2006.
   10.2   Employment  Agreement dated February 17, 2006, between Patron Systems,
          Inc. and Braden Waverley. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
          the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2006.
   10.3   Employment  Agreement dated February 17, 2006, between Patron Systems,
          Inc. and Martin Johnson.  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
          the Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2006.
   10.4   Option Agreement dated February 17, 2006, between Patron Systems, Inc.
          and Braden Waverley.  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
          Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2006.
   10.5   Option Agreement dated February 17, 2006, between Patron Systems, Inc.
          and Martin  Johnson.  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
          Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2006.
   10.6   Form of Subscription  Agreement between Patron Systems,  Inc. and each
          of the purchasers of shares of the Series A Preferred  Stock of Patron
          Systems, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current
          Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2006.
   10.7   Form of Common Stock Purchase  Warrant issued by Patron Systems,  Inc.
          in favor of each of the purchasers of shares of the Series A Preferred
          Stock of Patron  Systems,  Inc.  Incorporated  by reference to Exhibit
          10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2006.
   10.8   Registration  Rights  Agreement  dated March 27,  2006,  among  Patron
          Systems,  Inc.  and each of the  purchasers  of shares of the Series A
          Preferred Stock of Patron Systems,  Inc.  Incorporated by reference to
          Exhibit  10.3 to the  Current  Report  on Form 8-K  filed on March 31,
          2006.
   10.9   Post Closing  Escrow  Agreement  dated March 27, 2006,  between Stubbs
          Alderton & Markiles,  LLP and Patron  Systems,  Inc.  Incorporated  by
          reference to Exhibit  10.5 to the Current  Report on Form 8-K filed on
          March 31, 2006.
   31.1   Certification  of Principal  Executive  Officer pursuant to Securities
          Exchange Act Rules  13a-14(a)  and  15d-14(a)  as adopted  pursuant to
          Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   31.2   Certification  of Principal  Financial  Officer pursuant to Securities
          Exchange Act Rules  13a-14(a)  and  15d-14(a)  as adopted  pursuant to
          Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   32.1   Certification  of Principal  Executive  Officer  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
          Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002.
   32.2   Certification  of Principal  Financial  Officer  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
          Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002.


                                      EX-1