alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION





I, Richard R. Walters, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.

The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for  the Registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  June 21, 2005



By   /s/ Richard R. Walters



Richard R. Walters, President



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Geology and ground-water resources of the York-James Peninsula, Virginia

By: Dagfin John Cederstrom

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1361

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 778.1 Introductory statement. ( a ) This part contains the Department of Labor's general interpretations with respect to the meaning and application of the maximum hours and overtime pay requirements contained in section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (“the Act” or “FLSA”). The Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division will use these interpretations to guide the performance of his or her duties under the Act, and intends the interpretations to be used by employers, employees, and courts to understand employers' obligations and employees' rights under the Act. These official interpretations are issued by the Administrator on the advice of the Solicitor of Labor, as authorized by the Secretary (Reorg. Pl. 6 of 1950, 64 Stat. 1263; Gen. Ord. 45A, published in the Federal Register on May 24, 1950).
( b ) The Department recognizes that compensation practices can vary significantly and will continue to evolve in the future. The Department also recognizes that it is not feasible to address all of the various compensation and benefits arrangements that may exist between employers and employees, both currently and in the future. In general, the FLSA does not restrict the forms of “remuneration” that an employer may pay—which may include an hourly rate, salary, commission, piece rate, a combination thereof, or any other method—as long as the regular rate is equal to at least the applicable minimum wage and compensation for overtime hours worked is paid at the rate of at least one and one-half times the regular rate. While the eight categories of payments in section 7(e)(1)-(8) are the exhaustive list of payments excludable from the regular rate, this part does not contain an exhaustive list of permissible or impermissible compensation practices under section 7(e), unless otherwise indicated. Rather, it provides examples of regular rate and overtime calculations under the FLSA and the types of compensation that may be excluded from regular rate calculations under section 7(e) of the FLSA.
[84 FR 68770, Dec. 16, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,253
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 434
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   54,748
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        12,927
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          12,803
<LOANS>                                      380,071
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               463,181
<DEPOSITS>                                   337,544
<SHORT-TERM>                                  20,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4,702
<LONG-TERM>                                   40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      23,536
<OTHER-SE>                                    37,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               463,181
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,157
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,056
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8,213
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,578
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,099
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,994
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,406
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     940
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.67
<LOANS-NON>                                      419
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,800
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     64
<RECOVERIES>                                      10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,866
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,866
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          170



</TABLE>
#### § 500.46 Filing an application.

Registration under the Act is required whether or not licensing or registration is required under State law.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 13-73V 

(Not to be published) 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 * 

RICHARD PLANTZ, * 

 * Filed: June 29, 2015 

 Petitioner, * 

 * Decision by Stipulation; Attorney’s 

 v. * Fees & Costs 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * 

HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent 

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On January 29, 2013, Richard Plantz filed a petition seeking compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. On January 13, 2015, the parties filed a 

stipulation detailing an amount to be awarded to Petitioner. I subsequently issued a decision 

finding the parties’ stipulation to be reasonable and granting Petitioner the award outlined by the 

stipulation. 

On June 29, 2015, counsel for both parties filed another joint stipulation, this time in 

regards to attorney’s fees and costs. The parties have stipulated that Petitioner’s counsel should 

receive a lump sum of $27,197.63, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s 

 

1

 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my actions in this case, I will post it on the United States 

Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 

Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002) (current version at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2014)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential 

information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction 

“of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is 

privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute 

a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be available to 

the public. Id. 
counsel. This amount represents a sum to which Respondent does not object. In addition, and in 

compliance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner has represented that he did incur any reimbursable 

costs in proceeding on this petition. 

I approve the requested amount for attorney’s fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly, 

an award should be made in the form of a check in the amount of $27,197.63 payable jointly to 

Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Isaiah Richard Kalinowski. In the absence of a motion for 

review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT

in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Brian H. Corcoran

 Brian H. Corcoran 

 Special Master 

 

2

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their

right to seek review.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 317 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 317

   To constitute the minority party's membership on the Committee on 
  Veterans' Affairs for the remainder of the 110th Congress or until 
                      their successors are chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2007

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To constitute the minority party's membership on the Committee on 
  Veterans' Affairs for the remainder of the 110th Congress or until 
                      their successors are chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the minority party's 
appointments to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs for the remainder of 
the 110th Congress or until their successors are chosen: Mr. Burr, Mr. 
Specter, Mr. Craig, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hutchison, and Mr. 
Ensign.
                                 <all>
```
N o

. 01

- 15

- 00395

- CR

EVER RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

X

X

VS. X FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

X

X

THE STATE OF TEXAS X 1 ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

COMES NOW, EVER RODRIGUEZ GONZALEZ , Appellant, and moves

for a n extension of t

ime in which to file the Appellant’s brief, until and including

Monday, October 12

, 2015 , and would further show as follows:

A. The deadline for fil ing the brief in this cause was September 28, 2015 ;

B. A request is hereby made for an extension of time to file the Appellant’s

Brief, until and including Monday, October 12, 2015 ;

C. The undersigned attorney, Bob Wicoff, has been unusually busy with oth er

matters which have kept him from completing the brief by the current deadline,

including, but not limited to, the following:

KENNETH BROWN VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS; NO. 01

- 15

- 00357

- CR ; Appellant’s Brief due October 5, 2015

.

Additionally, the undersigned serves on two panels of the Texas Forensic

Science Commission , the Hair Microscopy Panel and the DNA Mixture Interpretation

Panel

, both of which consum e a large amount of the undersigned’s time and typically ACCEPTED

01-15-00395-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/5/2015 12:00:00 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKrequire weekly out

- of

- town travel . Counsel has also sp oken at two CLEs in the past

month , including a symposium in Boston on September 25 , 2015 at Northeastern law

School

.

D. Two previous extension s ha ve been granted. No further extensions will be

needed.

WHEREFORE, the Appellant requests that the deadline for filing his brief in

this case be extended until and including October 12, 2015

.

R espectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas

/s/ Bob Wicoff

__________ BOB WICOFF

1201 Franklin, Thirteenth Floor

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 274

- 6781

TBA No. 21422700

Bob.wicoff@pdo.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true copy of this motion has been served electronically on the Harris County

District Attorney’s Office Appellate Division on October 3, 2015

.

/s/

_ Bob Wicoff

_________ BOB WICOFF
#### J L. Lillard’s Ex’r. *vs*Joseph Lillard’s Ex’rs. *et*al..

*April*22.

Error to the Mercer Circuit.

*Pleas and pleading. Abatement. Parties.*

The omission of the name of one of several ex’rs. is but matter of abatement which must be taken advantage ot by-plea in abatement, or demur in the nature of a plea in abatement hied in proper time.

The penalty of a bond being joint a joint action maybe maintained upon it, tho’ the condition may require different sums tobe paid to each — or a separate action may be maintained in the name of each to -whom any thing is to be performed.

That the writ was served by one interested must be taken advantage of in the court below, and in proper time, it is matter of abatement. This Court will not decide upon matters not embraced by errors assigned.

*Willis*for plaintiffs : *Harlan fy Craddock*for def’ts.

Chief Justice Ewing

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The variance produced by the omission of the name of one of the administrators of John McGee, dec’d. could alone have been taken advantage of by plea in abatement, or by demurrer in the nature of a plea in abatement, in the Court below, filed within the proper time. It is a dilatory defence, and cannot be taken advantage of by a motion in arrest of judgment.

The penalty of the bond sued on is joint, and a joint action may be maintained in the name *of all the obligors*on the same, though the condition may require different amounts to be paid to each. A several action might no doubt have been sustained, on the condition in the name of each, for the amount undertaken to be paid to each, but this does not preclude the right to the joint action, in the name of *all,*on the penal undertaking *to all.*

Jacob Keller, though one of the plaintiffs, had no interest in the amount sought to be recovered, as appears by the condition of the bond, as well as by an indorsement upon the writ, that “the suit is for the benefit of Joseph McGee.”

His service of the writ as deputy Sheriff, should have been taken advantage of in the Court below, and within the proper time. It was matter of abatement only. There being no other errors assigned, we can notice no other, though we perceive one which if taken advantage of in the proper form, might have been made radically available.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, &c.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                        16,186
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 305,387
<ALLOWANCES>                  13,241
<INVENTORY>                   269,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              616,405
<PP&E>                        959,286
<DEPRECIATION>                533,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,224,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         360,173
<BONDS>                       302,352
<COMMON>                      144,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    256,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,224,151
<SALES>                       1,884,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,884,013
<CGS>                         1,407,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,407,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            19,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>               128,196
<INCOME-TAX>                  33,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           94,896
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  94,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 3.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                 3.20
        


</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Arkansas Industries

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Blair, Bertha. 						*Women in Arkansas Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 124*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5418,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
IIA 

Calendar No. 179 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 14 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales 

no longer holds the confidence of the Senate and of the American people. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DODD, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BINGAMAN, 

Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BYRD, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

CONRAD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. KERRY, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON

of Florida, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. REID, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. STABENOW, and 

Mr. WEBB) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read the 

first time 

MAY 25, 2007 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Attorney General 

Alberto Gonzales no longer holds the confidence of the 

Senate and of the American people. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•SJ 14 PCS 

1 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE. 

2 It is the sense of the Senate that Attorney General 

3 Alberto Gonzales no longer holds the confidence of the 

4 Senate and of the American people. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 179 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 14 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Attorney 

people. confidence of the Senate and of the American General Alberto Gonzales no longer holds the 

MAY 25, 2007 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS