alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Susan Nickerson, Appellant, v Volt Delta Resources, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 10, 1995;

decided October 24, 1995

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
EPA and International Truck and Engine Corporation to

Develop Clean Diesel Combustion Technology

Clean Automotive Technology...

Innovation that Works

• A new technology partnership known as a Cooperative Research And Development Agreement

(CRADA) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and International Truck and

Engine Corporation was announced by Administrator Mike Leavitt on May 13, 2004. The partnership

will further develop and determine the commercial viability of a new EPA diesel emission technology

called Clean Diesel Combustion (CDC).

• The CRADA calls for EPA and International to work together to move the

CDC technology from EPA’s research laboratory to the marketplace.

• Clean Diesel Combustion was invented in EPA’s National Vehicle and

Fuel Emissions Laboratory in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and holds promise

for providing another pathway in meeting the 2007 Heavy-Duty Diesel

nitrogen oxides (NOx) emission levels while maintaining good fuel

efficiency. The measured fuel efficiency of Clean Diesel Combustion

engines running in EPA’s laboratory indicates there is no loss of fuel

efficiency (brake efficiencies above 40 percent).

• Clean Diesel Combustion shows the potential to meet the level of

upcoming diesel emissions standards without NOx aftertreatment, NOx

traps, NOxcatalysts or urea SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction).

• Clean Diesel Combustion still requires engine aftertreatment to reduce the particulate matter (PM),

hydrocarbon (HC), and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions to the levels of the upcoming stringent Tier 2

and 2007 Heavy-Duty standards.

• Clean Diesel Combustion technology is the combination of several innovative improvements in diesel

fuel injection system performance, reoptimization and refinement of air management/turbocharging

systems, and an improved combustion system.

• International is making significant investments in advancing CDC technology into their product line,

starting with an evaluation in their V-6 diesel engine sized for SUVs and pickups.

• Future diesel engines will offer tremendous opportunity to reduce vehicle fuel consumption, since the

diesel engine is 25-40 percent more efficient than a similar gasoline powered vehicle.

• Automotive diesels are one of several exciting technologies that can improve fuel efficiency, lower U.S.

dependence on imported oil, and also reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

May 2004

www.epa.gov/otaq/technology EPA420-F-04-036
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report Amendment No. 3 of Big Sky Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Selami Ahmet Sehsuvaroglu, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  December 16, 2005

By: /s/ Selami Ahmet Sehsuvaroglu

Name:  Selami Ahmet Sehsuvaroglu

Title:   Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 4262.15 Reinstatement of benefits previously suspended. ( a ) In accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 432(k) of the Code, a plan with benefits that were suspended under section 305(e)(9) or 4245(a) of ERISA must: ( 1 ) Reinstate any benefits that were suspended for participants and beneficiaries effective as of the first month in which the special financial assistance is paid to the plan; and
( 2 ) Make payments equal to the amounts of benefits previously suspended to any participants or beneficiaries who are in pay status as of the date that the special financial assistance is paid.
( b ) A plan must make the payments in paragraph (a)(2) of this section either in: ( 1 ) A single lump sum no later than 3 months after the date that the special financial assistance is paid to the plan; or
( 2 ) Equal monthly installments over a period of 5 years, with the first installment paid no later than 3 months after the date that the special financial assistance is paid to the plan, with no installment payment adjusted for interest.
( c ) The plan sponsor of a plan with benefits that were suspended under section 305(e)(9) or 4245(a) of ERISA must issue a notice of reinstatement to participants and beneficiaries whose benefits were previously suspended and then reinstated in accordance with section 4262(k) of ERISA and section 432(k) of the Code. The requirements for the notice are in notice of reinstatement instructions available on PBGC's website at *www.pbgc.gov .*
**Exhibit No. 21**

**Madison Gas and Electric Co. and Consolidated    Subsidiaries**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

As of Dec. 31, 2000, the Company owned 100% of the voting securities of  the following subsidiaries (all Wisconsin corporations):

> 
MAGAEL LLC - holds title to property acquired by the Company for future utility    plant expansion and nonutility property.

Central Wisconsin Development Corporation - assists new and expanding businesses    throughout Central Wisconsin by participating in planning, financing, property    acquisition, joint ventures, and associated activities.

Great Lakes Energy Corp. - Liquidated effective Nov. 30, 2000

Wisconsin Resources Corporation - Inactive

North Central Technologies, Inc. - Inactive

Mid America Technologies, Inc. - Inactive

Great Lakes Energy Corp. owned 100% of the voting securities of the following  subsidiary (a Wisconsin corporation):

> 
American Energy Management, Inc. - Liquidated effective Nov. 30, 2000
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           302 CERTIFICATION

I, R.H. Wollenberg, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Longview Fibre
Company;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
         to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
         period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
         the end of the period covered by this report based on such
         evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the
        registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
        fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
        affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
        registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

R. H. WOLLENBERG	                              01/21/04
R. H. WOLLENBERG,
President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 520.503 What must I demonstrate in my application for a student-learner certificate to receive a favorable review? Each student-learner application must demonstrate that: ( a ) The training program under which the student-learner will be employed is a bona fide vocational training program as defined in subpart C of this part;
( b ) The employment of the student-learner at subminimum wages authorized by the special certificate must be necessary to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment;
( c ) The student-learner is at least sixteen years of age, or at least eighteen years of age if employed in any occupation which the Secretary has declared to be particularly hazardous (see part 570, subpart E, of this chapter, but note the specific exemptions for student-learners in several of the orders);
( d ) The occupation for which the student-learner is receiving preparatory training requires a sufficient degree of skill to necessitate a substantial learning period;
( e ) The training is not for the purpose of acquiring manual dexterity and high production speed in repetitive operations;
( f ) The employment of a student-learner will not have the effect of displacing a worker employed in the establishment;
( g ) The employment of the student-learners at subminimum wages must not tend to impair or depress the wage rates or working standards established for experienced workers for work of a like or comparable character;
( h ) The occupational needs of the community or industry warrant the training of student-learners;
( i ) There are no serious outstanding violations of the provisions of a student-learner certificate previously issued to the employer, or serious violations of any other provisions of the FLSA by the employer which provide reasonable grounds to conclude that the terms of the certificate would not be complied with, if issued;
( j ) The issuance of such a certificate would not tend to prevent the development of apprenticeship programs in accordance with the regulations applicable thereto (subpart D of this part) or would not impair established apprenticeship standards in the occupation or industry involved; and
( k ) The number of student-learners to be employed in one establishment is not more than a small proportion of its work force.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49285-49286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20303]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1171; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASW-16]


Amendment of Class D Airspace; Corpus Christi, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the geographic coordinates in the 
regulatory text of a final rule that was published in the Federal 
Register June 2, 2011,

[[Page 49286]]

amending Class D airspace at Cabaniss Navy Outlying Field (NOLF), 
Corpus Christi, TX.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC August 25, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest 
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On June 2, 2011, the FAA published in the Federal Register a final 
rule amending Class D airspace at Cabaniss NOLF, Corpus Christi, TX (76 
FR 31821, Docket No. FAA-2010-1171). Subsequent to publication, an 
error was discovered in the latitude coordinates listed in the 
regulatory text. This action corrects that error. Class D airspace 
designations are published in paragraph 5000 of FAA Order 7400.9U dated 
August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, which is 
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1. The Class D airspace 
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in 
the Order.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
latitude coordinates listed in the regulatory text for the Class D 
airspace area at Cabaniss NOLF, Corpus Christi, TX, as published in the 
Federal Register June 2, 2010 (76 FR 31821), (FR Doc. 2011-13559), are 
corrected as follows:

ASW TX D Corpus Christi, TX [Corrected]

Cabaniss NOLF, TX

    On page 31822, column 1, line 49 of the regulatory text, remove 
`lat. 27[deg]38'15'' N.,' and insert `lat. 27[deg]38'16'' N.'; and on 
line 50 remove `lat. 27[deg]41'30'' N.,' and insert `lat. 
27[deg]41'22'' N.'

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 2, 2011.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2011-20303 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF FORMER INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The
Board of Directors
Summa Industries:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the Company's 1984 and 1991 Stock Option Plans, filed on
April 15, 1993, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed on January 31, 1997 (No. 333-20835), the amendment to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998
(No. 333-68921), the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68981), the amendment to the 1999 Stock Option Plan, filed on
May 3, 2002 (No. 333-87692), the Summa ESOP and 401(k) Stock Option Plan, filed on September 8, 1997 (No. 333-35163), the Calnetics Stock Option
Plan, filed on October 21, 1997(No. 333-38415), the Falcon Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on December 15, 1998 (No. 333-68983), the Plastron
Acquisition Stock Option Plan, filed on May 20, 1999 (No. 333-78873), the Plastic Specialties, Inc. Acquisition Stock Option Plan filed on May 3, 2002
(No. 333-87690), and the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-4 pertaining to the LexaLite Stock Option Plan, filed on September 9, 1996
(No. 333-11571), of Summa Industries and subsidiaries of our report dated October 7, 2002, except for note 19, which is as of July 9, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of Summa Industries and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and
our report on Schedule II "Valuation and Qualifying Accounts", which reports appear in the fiscal year 2003 annual report on Form 10-K.

Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the Company's restatement of its disclosure related to its reportable segments and to our audit of the adjustments that were
applied to revise the disclosures for reportable segments for the 2001 consolidated financial statements, as more fully described in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements. However,
we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements other than with respect to such adjustments.

/s/
KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP

Los
Angeles, California
October 30, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer

I, Robert Kinloch, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report of Maverick Minerals Corp.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) 	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) 	all deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: August 15, 2005 | /s/ Robert Kinloch                                 
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|                      | Robert Kinloch                                     
|                      | Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer





---
#### § 401.8 Trusteeship.

*Trusteeship* means any receivership, trusteeship, or other method of supervision or control whereby a labor organization suspends the autonomy otherwise available to a subordinate body under its constitution or bylaws.
§ 500.3 Effective date of the Act; transition period; repeal of the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act. ( a ) The provisions of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act are effective on April 14, 1983, and are codified in 29 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.*
( b ) The Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act repeals the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act of 1963, as amended, (7 U.S.C. 2041, *et seq.*), effective April 14, 1983.
( c ) Violations of the Farm Labor Contractor Registration Act occurring prior to April 14, 1983, may be pursued by the Department of Labor after that date.
#### § 779.268 Grace period of 1 month for computation.

Where it is not practicable to compute the annual gross volume of sales or business under paragraph (b) of § 779.266 in time to determine obligations under the Act for the current quarter, an enterprise or establishment may use a 1-month grace period. If this 1-month grace period is used, the computations made under this section will determine its obligations under the Act for the 3-month period commencing 1 month after the end of the preceding calendar or fiscal quarter. Once adopted the same basis must be used for each successive 3-month period.
#### § 780.708 A country elevator is located near and serves farmers.

Country elevators, as commonly recognized, are typically located along railroads in small towns or rural areas near grain farmers, and have facilities especially designed for receiving bulk grain by wagon or truck from farms, elevating it to storage bins, and direct loading of the grain in its natural state into railroad boxcars. The principal function of such elevators is to provide a point of initial concentration for grain grown in their local area and to handle, store for limited periods, and load out such grain for movement in carload lots by rail from the producing area to its ultimate destination. They also perform a transport function in facilitating the even and orderly movement of grain over the interstate network of railroads from the producing areas to terminal elevators, markets, mills, processors, consumers, and to seaboard ports for export. The country elevator is typically the farmer's market for his grain or the point at which his grain is delivered to carriers for transportation to market. The elevator may purchase the grain from the farmer or store and handle it for him, and it may also store and handle substantial quantities of grain owned by or pledged to the Government under a price-support program. Country elevators customarily receive, weigh, test, grade, clean, mix, dry, fumigate, store, and load out grain in its natural state, and provide certain incidental services and supplies to farmers in the locality. The foregoing attributes of country elevators have been recognized by the courts. See, for example, *Mitchell* v. *Sampson Const. Co.* (D. Kan.) 14 WH Cases 269; *Tobin* v. *Flour Mills,* 185 F. 2d 596; *Holt* v. *Barnesville Elevator Co.,* 145 F. 2d 250; *Remington* v. *Shaw* (W.D. Mich.), 2 WH Cases 262.