alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit No. 21**

**Madison Gas and Electric Company and Subsidiaries**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

As of December 31, 2001, the company owned 100% of the voting securities  of the following subsidiaries (all Wisconsin corporations):

- MAGAEL, LLC - holds title to property acquired by the company for future  utility plant expansion and nonutility property.

- Central Wisconsin Development Corporation - assists new and expanding businesses  throughout central Wisconsin by participating in planning, financing, property  acquisition, joint ventures and associated activities.

- MGE Energy, Inc. - Inactive

- Wisconsin Resources Corporation - Inactive

- North Central Technologies, Inc. - Inactive

- Mid America Technologies, Inc. - Inactive
§ 71.6 Fees for access to records. ( a ) *When charged.* A component shall charge fees pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 9701 and 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(5) for the copying of records unless the component, in its discretion, waives or reduces the fees for good cause shown. A component shall charge fees at the rate of $0.15 per page. In accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, the first 100 pages of copying shall be furnished without charge. For materials other than paper copies, the component may charge the direct costs of reproduction, but only if the requester has been notified of such costs before they are incurred. Fees shall not be charged where they would amount, in the aggregate, for one request or for a series of related requests, to less than $15.00. Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph, the first copy of an individual's Privacy Act record shall be provided to the individual at no cost.
( b ) *Notice of estimated fees amounting to between $25 to $250.* When a component determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section may amount to between $25 to $250, the component shall notify the requester as soon as practicable of the actual or estimated amount of the fee, unless the requester has indicated in advance his willingness to pay a fee as high as that anticipated.
( c ) *Notice of estimated fees in excess of $250.* When a component determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section may amount to more than $250, the component shall notify the requester as soon as practicable of the actual or estimated amount of the fee, unless the requester has indicated in advance his willingness to pay a fee as high as that estimated. If the fee is estimated to be in excess of $250, then the agency may require payment in advance. (If only a portion of the fee can be estimated readily, the component shall advise the requester that the estimated fee may be only a portion of the total fee.) Where the estimated fee exceeds $250 and a component has so notified the requester, the component will be deemed not to have received the request for access to records until the requester has paid the anticipated fee, in full or in part. A notice to a requester pursuant to this paragraph shall offer him the opportunity to confer with Department personnel with the object of reformulating his request to meet his needs at a lower cost.
( d ) *Form of payment.* Requesters must pay fees by cash, check or money order payable to either the Treasury of the United States, or the U.S. Department of Labor. However, the Department shall not require advance payment in any case where the fee is under $250, except that where a requester has previously failed to pay a fee charged under this part, the requester must pay the component or the Department the full amount owed and make an advance deposit of the full amount of any estimated fee before a component shall be required to process a new or pending request for access from that requester.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-457-A-D (Third Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on heavy forged hand tools from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to industries in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on January 3, 2011 (76 F.R. 168) and determined on April 8, 2011 that it would conduct expedited reviews (76 FR 31631, June 1, 2011).

                    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the                           ( print page 50756)                        Secretary of Commerce on August 10, 2011. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4250 (August 2011), entitled                     *Heavy Forged Hand Tools From China: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-457-A-D (Third Review).*

Issued: August 10, 2011.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Acting Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2011-20731 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### § 780.211 Contract production of hatching eggs.

It is common practice for hatcherymen to enter into arrangements with farmer poultry raisers for the production of hatching eggs which the hatchery agrees to buy. Ordinarily, the farmer furnishes the facilities, feed and labor and the hatchery furnishes the basic stock of poultry. The farmer undertakes a specialized program of care and improvement of the flock in cooperation with the hatchery. The hatchery may at times have a surplus of eggs, including those suitable for hatching and culled eggs which it sells. Activities such as grading and packing performed by the hatchery employees in connection with the disposal of these eggs, are an incident to the breeding of poultry by the hatchery and are within the scope of agriculture.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Ashley Tangonan <ash679@hawaii.edu> 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:42 PM 

Faulk, Scott (OST); EAS (OST) 

EAS Kaulapapa 

Dear Department of Transportation, 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, 

and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, 

frequent flights, multiple islands and ease of booking via Global Distribution System. It is important we 

have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. I travel 2 x a week on mokulele airlines for 

bussiness,and there flight availability is what works. All the other islands depends on a reliable flight 

service. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years 

Mahala, 

Pualani Tangonan 

1
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 11:36 AM

To: 'TiffanyJavernick@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - uMAP, LLC

Dear Ms. Javernick:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA−2015−1473).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter than air) for the proposed UAS

operation.  The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be located in

the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/22/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
§ 779.338 Effect of 1961 and 1966 amendments. ( a ) The 1961 amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act narrowed the exemption for retail or service establishments by permitting section 13(a)(2) to be applied only to an establishment which was not in a covered enterprise, or (if it was in such an enterprise) which had an annual gross volume of sales of less than $250,000 (exclusive of specified taxes). There were certain exemptions to this general principle. These exceptions were set out in section 13(a)(2)(ii) and (iii). The establishments enumerated therein were exempt whether or not they were in a covered enterprise and regardless of the annual dollar volume of sales. They were: Hotels, motels, restaurants, motion picture theaters, seasonally operated amusement or recreational establishments, hospitals, institutions primarily engaged in the care of the sick, the aged, the mentally ill or defective residing on the premises of the institution, and schools for physically or mentally handicapped or gifted children. These establishments were exempt if they met the basic 50 percent in State sales test and the 75 percent retail sales test of section 13(a)(2). The 1966 amendments to the Act repealed sections 13(a)(2)(ii) and (iii). Now to be exempt under section 13(a)(2) hotels, motels, and restaurants must meet the same tests as other retail or service establishments (see § 779.337). Seasonal amusement or recreational establishments and motion picture theaters now have special exemptions from both the minimum wage and overtime pay provisions of the Act as provided by the 1966 amendments in sections 13(a)(3) and 13(a)(9) respectively.
( b ) Certain establishments which were previously exempt under section 13(a)(2) prior to the 1966 amendments have been specifically excluded from this exemption as a result of the amendments, even though they may still qualify as retail or service establishments under the definition of such an establishment in that section. These are hospitals, institutions primarily engaged in the care of the sick, the aged, the mentally ill or defective residing on the premises of the institution, and schools for physically or mentally handicapped or gifted children. However, such institutions have been recognized as having a retail concept and where the nature of their operations has not changed and where they otherwise satisfy the Act's definition of a “retail or service establishment”, certain food service employees employed by such institutions will be considered to be exempt from the Act's overtime pay provisions under section 13(b)(18), exemptions for their administrative or executive employees will not be defeated by nonexempt work occupying less than 40 percent of the employee's time, and full-time students may be employed in accordance with the special minimum wage provisions of section 14 of the Act and part 519 of this chapter.
#### § 785.37 Home to work on special one-day assignment in another city.

A problem arises when an employee who regularly works at a fixed location in one city is given a special 1-day work assignment in another city. For example, an employee who works in Washington, DC, with regular working hours from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. may be given a special assignment in New York City, with instructions to leave Washington at 8 a.m. He arrives in New York at 12 noon, ready for work. The special assignment is completed at 3 p.m., and the employee arrives back in Washington at 7 p.m. Such travel cannot be regarded as ordinary home-to-work travel occasioned merely by the fact of employment. It was performed for the employer's benefit and at his special request to meet the needs of the particular and unusual assignment. It would thus qualify as an integral part of the “principal” activity which the employee was hired to perform on the workday in question; it is like travel involved in an emergency call (described in § 785.36), or like travel that is all in the day's work (see § 785.38). All the time involved, however, need not be counted. Since, except for the special assignment, the employee would have had to report to his regular work site, the travel between his home and the railroad depot may be deducted, it being in the “home-to-work” category. Also, of course, the usual meal time would be deductible.
#### § 459.2 Additional time after service by mail.

Whenever a party has the right or is required to do some act pursuant to these regulations within a prescribed period after service of a notice or other paper upon him and the notice or paper is served on him by mail, five (5) days shall be added to the prescribed period: *Provided, however,* That five (5) days shall not be added if any extension of time may have been granted.
Form of Term Sale Gas Contract with Snyder Brothers, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.3 

FORM OF 

TERM SALE GAS CONTRACT 
 WITH SNYDER BROTHERS, INC. 







 TERM SALE 
 GAS CONTRACT 
 2011PNG101P 

 

	BUYER:    SNYDER	BROTHERS, INC. 

  

	SELLER:	

 Period: 4/01/11 thru 3/31/12 

 

									
	 1.      Quantity:
	  	Approximately MCF per month
		
	 2.      Sales Price:
	  	NYMEX + $0.18 per MCF less any applicable retainage, gathering, processing, etc.
		
	 3.      Pipeline:
	  	Peoples Natural Gas (PNG)
		
	 4.      Receipt Point:
	  	Meter #’s
		
	 5.      Payment:
	  	Thirty (30) days after receipt of transportation statement
	
	 6.      A production month shall be a minimum of 28 days and a maximum of 32 days
unless otherwise agreed upon by buyer. Seller has the right to convert the NYMEX portion of the contract to a fixed price at mutually agreeable terms. In the event of a price lock-in, Seller will be responsible to supply the supplied lock-in
volumes.


  
  

									
	BUYER	 		 		 	SELLER	 	
	SNYDER BROTHERS, INC.	 		 		 	
	P.O. Box 1022	 		 		 	
	1 Glade Park East	 		 		 	
	Kittanning, PA 16201	 		 		 	
	PH: 724-548-8101	 		 	PH:	 	
	FAX: 724-545-8243	 		 	FAX:	 	
					
	BY:	 	  
	 		 	BY:	 	  

		 	Benjamin T. Snyder	 		 		 	
	TITLE: 	 	Vice President of Marketing	 		 	TITLE:	 	
	DATE:	 	  
	 		 	DATE:
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Arthur Hicks, the Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Arthur Hicks                     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Arthur Hicks, Chief Financial
Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | By: | /s/ J. Thomas Wilson |   |
|   |   |   | John Thomas Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   | (as Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | February 15, 2013 |   |   |   |
§ 779.21 Enterprise. ( a ) Section 3(r) of the Act provides, in pertinent part that “enterprise” as used in the Act: means the related activities performed (either through unified operation or common control) by any person or persons for a common business purpose, and includes all such activities whether performed in one or more establishments or by one or more corporate or other organizational units including departments of an establishment operated through leasing arrangements, but shall not include the related activities performed for such enterprise by an independent contractor: *Provided,* That, within the meaning of this subsection, a retail or service establishment which is under independent ownership shall not be deemed to be so operated or controlled as to be other than a separate and distinct enterprise by reason of any arrangement, which includes, but is not necessarily limited to, an agreement, (a) that it will sell, or sell only, certain goods specified by a particular manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser, or (b) that it will join with other such establishments in the same industry for the purpose of the collective purchasing, or (c) that it will have the exclusive right to sell the goods or use the brand name of a manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser within a specified area, or by reason of the fact that it occupies premises leased to it by a person who also leases premises to other retail or service establishments * * *
The scope and application of this definitional language is discussed in subpart C of this part.
( b ) The 1966 amendments added two clauses to the above language of the definition to make it clear that “the activities performed by any person or persons” will be regarded as performed for a business purpose if they are performed: (1) In connection with the operation of a hospital, an institution primarily engaged in the care of the sick, the aged, the mentally ill or defective who reside on the premises of such institution, a school for mentally or physically handicapped or gifted children, an elementary or secondary school, or an institution of higher education (regardless of whether or not such hospital, institution, or school is public or private or operated for profit or not for profit); or (2) In connection with the operation of a street, suburban, or interurban electric railway, or local trolley or motorbus carrier, if the rates and services of such railway or carrier are subject to regulation by a State or local agency (regardless of whether or not such railway or carrier is public or private or operated for profit or not for profit).
A discussion of the scope and application of this added language is contained in part 776 of this chapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes PIEC Advisory Committee will meet from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. on June 9, 2000 at Red Oaks Square, 1230 NE. 3rd, Suite A-262, Bend, Oregon. Agenda items include PAC comments for the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, Info Sharing Around the Province, and a Public Forum from 11:30 a.m. till 12 p.m. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mollie Chaudet, Province Liaison, USDA, Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger District, 1230 N.E. 3rd., Bend, OR, 97701, Phone (541) 383-4769.

Dated: May 23, 2000.

Rebecca Heath,

Acting Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-13500 Filed 5-30-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 779.246 Inflow test under section 3(s)(1) of the Act prior to 1966 amendments.

To come within the scope of section 3(s)(1) of the prior Act, the enterprise, in addition to the other conditions, must purchase or receive goods for resale that move or have moved across State lines (not in deliveries from the reselling establishment) which amount in total annual volume to $250,000 or more. To meet this condition, it must be shown that (a) the enterprise purchases or receives goods for resale (§ 779.248), (b) that such goods move or have moved across State lines (§ 779.249), and (c) that such purchases and receipts amount in total annual volume to $250,000 or more (§ 779.253). Enterprises which do not meet this test may be covered under section 3(s)(1) of the present Act, which contains no interstate inflow requirement.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

                               UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officers  of Patron  Systems,  Inc.,  a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"),  do hereby  certify  with  respect  to the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended  September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

1.       the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: November 21, 2005                 /S/ ROBERT CROSS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert Cross

                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        & Acting Chief Financial Officer