alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 547.2 Disqualifying provisions. ( a ) No employee's participation in the plan shall be on other than a voluntary basis.
( b ) No employee's wages or salary shall be dependent upon or influenced by the existence of such thrift or savings plan or the employer's contributions thereto.
( c ) The amounts any employee may save under the plan, or the amounts paid by the employer under the plan may not be based upon the employee's hours of work, production or efficiency.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

 19 October 2004

(2004/C 258/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 10, 2009 

p0707 

Order 

 

July 10, 2009 

138083 

SANDRA ELLIS and GORDON ELLIS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 138083 

 COA: 279930 

Mecosta CC: 05-016890-NO 

JAMES HATCHEW, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would reverse the judgment of 

the Court of Appeals because they are not persuaded that the trial court erred when it 

denied the defendant’s motion for summary disposition. When the facts are viewed in a 

light most favorable to the plaintiff, there were disputed issues of material fact relating to 

the applicability of the open and obvious doctrine.
Questions?  Privacy  Site Index  Contact Us    Home  |  Services  |  Working with ACF  |  Policy/Planning  |  About ACF  |  ACF NewsSearch   
Return to SSBG Home | Return to OCS Home
SSBG REPORTS
AnnualReport on Expenditures and Recipients 2002

Annual Reporton Expenditures and Recipients 2001

Annual Report on Expenditures andRecipients 2000

2000 Focus Reports 

Annual Report on Expenditures andRecipients 1999

1999 Focus Reports 

AnnualReport on Expenditures and Recipients 1998

 

This document was last modified 10/5/04 4:37 PM EST 
ACF Home|Questions?|Site Index|Contact Us|Accessibility|Privacy Policy|Freedom of Information Act|DisclaimersDepartment of Health and Human Services|The White House|FirstGov|USA Freedom Corps

Administration for Children and Families • 370 L'Enfant     Promenade, S.W. • Washington, D.C. 20447
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 402ND DISTRICT COURT OF WOOD COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 27th

day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

DEBBI LOFTON, Appellant

NO. 12-15-00028-CV; Trial Court No. 2014-550

By per curiam opinion.

MILTON SOWARD, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the 

appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 12th day of May, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-70567, 333-162668, and 333-171149 on Form S-8 and 333-177331 on Form S-3 of our report dated September 20, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements (before retrospective adjustments to the financial statements and financial statement disclosures) of Magellan Petroleum Corporation and subsidiaries (not presented herein) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the retrospective adjustments for the adoption of ASU 2011-5, to the disclosures for a change in the composition of reportable segments and for reclassifications to certain financial statement captions, discussed in Notes 1 and 16 to the consolidated financial statements), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Magellan Petroleum Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2012.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Hartford, Connecticut


September 24, 2012
EXHIBIT 32(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code
as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, Arthur W. Hicks, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    ARTHUR W. HICKS,
JR.                                   
|                      |  |  |  | Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.                                          
|                      |  |  |  | President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES**

 

LexaLite International Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Aquarius Brands, Inc., a California corporation

KVP Falcon Plastic Belting, Inc., a California corporation

Central Valley Manufacturing, Inc., a California corporation

Plastron Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Plastic Specialties, Inc., a Mississippi corporation

Calnetics Corporation, a California corporation

Fullerton Holdings, Inc., a California corporation

KVP Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Genesta, Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                  ------------



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marc S. Hermelin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date:     June 25, 2008
      --------------------                     /s/  Marc S. Hermelin
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                                    Marc S. Hermelin
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONTE GWYNN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-5)

Submitted: September 20, 2012 Decided: November 1, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donte Gwynn, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donte Gwynn appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion requesting that he be transferred from state to 

federal custody. We have reviewed the record and conclude that 

the district court’s judgment does not suffer from reversible 

error, as the issue of Gwynn’s place of confinement is squarely 

within the prerogative of the Attorney General. See Jake v. 

Herschberger, 173 F.3d 1059, 1065 (7th Cir. 1999); United 

States v. Warren, 610 F.2d 680, 684-85 (9th Cir. 1980). We 

therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2004 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-23-2004

Chen v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 03-2156

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Chen v. Atty Gen USA" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 782.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/782
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-2156

 

QI DENG CHEN,

 Petitioner

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General

of the United States,

 Respondent

 

On Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board file no. A76-280-480 )

 

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

April 22, 2004

BEFORE: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, and ROSENN and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

(Filed: April 23, 2004)

 

OPINION OF THE COURT

 

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

This matter comes on before this court on Qi Deng Chen’s petition for review of a

final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dated April 7, 2003, affirming, without

opinion, a decision of an immigration judge denying his applications for asylum,
2

withholding of removal, and deferral of removal under the United Nations Convention

Against Torture. The immigration judge denied Chen relief in an oral decision followed

by a written order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). As Chen

acknowledges, see petitioner’s br. at 12-14, our standard of review is deferential both as

to the law and the facts, though it is somewhat more expansive on legal issues. See

Abdulrahman v. Ashcroft, 330 F.3d 587, 591 (3d Cir. 2003); Abdille v. Ashcroft, 242

F.3d 477, 483 (3d Cir. 2001).

In considering this matter we are aware that since Congress amended the definition

of “refugee” in 1996 to include persons who are subject to, or opponents of, coercive

population control programs, federal courts have undertaken the difficult task of

determining which types of resistance to such programs merit protection through refugee

status. See, e.g., Li v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Here we have

reviewed this matter and have concluded that the record supports the immigration judge’s

finding that Chen has failed to establish persecution arising from resistence to a

population control policy. Rather, any punishment of him would be by reason of his

altercation with a public official. We will not stretch INA § 101(a)(42)(A), 8 U.S.C. §

1101(a)(42)(A), to include such conduct to be a “political opinion” entitled to protection.

The petition for review will be denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 45465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18428]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Bureau of International Labor Affairs; Labor Advisory Committee 
for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy

ACTION: Meeting Notice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Labor Advisory 
Committee for Trade Negotiation and Trade Policy. Date, Time, Place: 
September 4, 2014; 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.; U.S. Department of Labor, 
Secretary's Conference Room, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC.
    Purpose: The meeting will include a review and discussion of 
current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. Potential U.S. 
negotiating objectives and bargaining positions in current and 
anticipated trade negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 
2155(f)(2)(A), it has been determined that the meeting will be 
concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously 
compromise the Government's negotiating objectives or bargaining 
positions. Therefore, the meeting is exempt from the requirements of 
subsections (a) and (b) of sections 10 and 11 of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (relating to open meetings, public notice, public 
participation, and public availability of documents). 5 U.S.C. app. 
Accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne M. Zollner, Chief, Trade Policy 
and Negotiations Division; Phone: (202) 693-4890.

    Signed at Washington, DC, the 30th day of July, 2014.
Carol Pier,
Deputy Undersecretary, International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-18428 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>                           9
  <CIK>                               1074560
  <NAME>                              First Capital Bank Holding Corporation

<S>                            <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
  <CASH>                              2,768,151
  <INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>              253,427
  <FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                    3,432,000
  <TRADING-ASSETS>                    0
  <INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         14,083,977
  <INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>              277,000
  <INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                0
  <LOANS>                             16,890,985
  <ALLOWANCE>                         (211,000)
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                      39,440,884
  <DEPOSITS>                          30,239,427
  <SHORT-TERM>                        0
  <LIABILITIES-OTHER>                 58,120
  <LONG-TERM>                         0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
  <PREFERRED>                         0
  <COMMON>                            10,000
  <OTHER-SE>                          9,133,337
  <TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        39,440,884
  <INTEREST-LOAN>                     915,796
  <INTEREST-INVEST>                   630,465
  <INTEREST-OTHER>                    117,553
  <INTEREST-TOTAL>                    1,663,814
  <INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                  598,699
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  599,324
  <INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               1,103,174
  <LOAN-LOSSES>                       137,000
  <SECURITIES-GAINS>                  0
  <EXPENSE-OTHER>                     1,035,074
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                     77,250
  <INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          77,250
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
  <CHANGES>                           0
  <NET-INCOME>                        77,250
  <EPS-BASIC>                         .08
  <EPS-DILUTED>                       .08
  <YIELD-ACTUAL>                      4.47
  <LOANS-NON>                         0
  <LOANS-PAST>                        0
  <LOANS-TROUBLED>                    0
  <LOANS-PROBLEM>                     0
  <ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    74,000
  <CHARGE-OFFS>                       0
  <RECOVERIES>                        0
  <ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   211,000
  <ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                211,000
  <ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                 0
  <ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>             0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
LUKENS INC. 1995 FORM 10-K:  EXHIBIT 21



                                  LUKENS INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                               December 30, 1995


Lukens Inc. has 14 direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries:


                                                                  State or Other
                                                                 Jurisdiction of
                                                                   Incorporation
                                                                 ---------------

Brandywine Valley Railroad Company                                      Delaware
Encoat-North Arlington, Inc.                                            Delaware
Energy Coatings Company                                                 Delaware
LI Acquisition Corporation                                              Delaware
LI Service Company                                                  Pennsylvania
Lukens Development Corporation                                          Delaware
Lukens Foreign Sales Corporation                                        Barbados
Lukens Management Corporation                                       Pennsylvania
Lukens Steel Company                                                Pennsylvania
Pennock Corp.                                                           Delaware
Sponsor's Plan Asset Management, Inc.                                   Delaware
Washington Specialty Metals Corporation                                 Illinois
Washington Specialty Metals Inc.                                          Canada
Washington Steel Corporation                                            Delaware
#### § 511.13 Evidence.

In accordance with the notice of hearing, the committee and any authorized subcommittee will take official notice of the facts stated in the economic report to the extent they are not refuted by evidence received at the hearing. Other pertinent evidence available to the Department of Labor may be presented at the hearing. The committee itself may call witnesses not otherwise scheduled to testify. Oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the committee shall exclude irrelevant, immaterial, and unduly repetitious evidence. Every interested person who has met the requirements for participation as a party shall have the right to present his or her case by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination of witnesses called by others as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts. Testimony on behalf of an employer or group of employers as to inability to pay the minimum wage rate specified in paragraph (1) of section 6(a) of the Act, or as to inability to adjust to a higher minimum wage rate than prescribed by any applicable wage order of the Secretary, shall be supported by tangible objective data filed as part of the prehearing statement under § 511.8. Financial or other data shall include data for the most recent year or fraction thereof for which data are available. Financial statements filed in accordance with this provision, except those relating to a period of less than a full fiscal year or a fiscal year ending less than 90 days prior to the filing of the prehearing statement, shall be certified by an independent public accountant or shall be sworn to conform to and be consistent with the corresponding income tax returns covering the same years. Evidence of witnesses not present at the hearing may be submitted only by affidavits received with, or as a part of, a prehearing statement that meets the requirements of § 511.8 and satisfactorily explains why each affiant cannot be present. Such affidavits will be received in evidence to the same extent that testimony from affiants would have been admitted had they been present. The committee will give such weight to these statements as it considers appropriate, and the fact that such affiants have not been subject to cross-examination may be considered, along with other relevant facts, in assessing the weight to be given such evidence.

[55 FR 53299, Dec. 28, 1990]
#### § 520.202 How do persons who want to apply for a particular certificate find out what is needed?

The application process, terms, conditions and requirements of certificates and other matters are discussed in subparts D and E of this part. Messengers, learners (excluding student-learners), and apprentices are discussed in subpart D of this part and student-learners in subpart E of this part.
#### § 778.6 Effect of Davis-Bacon Act.

Section 1 of the Davis-Bacon Act (46 Stat. 1494, as amended; 40 U.S.C. 276a) provides for the inclusion of certain fringe benefits in the prevailing wages that are predetermined by the Secretary of Labor, under that Act and related statutes, as minimum wages for laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors performing construction activity on Federal and federally assisted projects. Laborers and mechanics performing work subject to such predetermined minimum wages may, if they work overtime, be subject to overtime compensation provisions of other laws which may apply concurrently to them, including the Fair Labor Standards Act. In view of this fact, specific provision was made in the Davis-Bacon Act for the treatment of such predetermined fringe benefits in the computation of overtime compensation under other applicable statutes including the Fair Labor Standards Act. The application of this provision is discussed in § 5.32 of this title, which should be considered together with the interpretations in this part 778 in determining any overtime compensation payable under the Fair Labor Standards Act to such laborers and mechanics in any workweek when they are subject to fringe benefit wage determinations under the Davis-Bacon and related acts.