alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of
the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Arthur Hicks, the Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |  |  |  |                                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.                           
|                      |  |  |  | Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.                               
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       32
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,858
<PP&E>                                              71
<DEPRECIATION>                                      36
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,994
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,775)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,893
<SALES>                                            352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   352
<CGS>                                              191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (619)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (619)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (619)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1329-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-1329-DR), dated May 13, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 19, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of a major disaster for the State of New Mexico is hereby amended to include Public Assistance for the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 13, 2000. Act (42 U.S.C. 5121*et seq.*), as follows:                 

Los Alamos County for Public Assistance (previously designated for Individual Assistance) 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. 

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 00-13324 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```

[115th Congress Public Law 269]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 3763]]

Public Law 115-269
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To require the Surface Transportation Board to implement certain 
     recommendations of the Inspector General of the Department of 
         Transportation. <<NOTE: Oct. 16, 2018 -  [H.R. 4921]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: STB Information 
Security Improvement Act.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``STB Information Security Improvement 
Act''.
SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) <<NOTE: Timeline. Plan.>> In General.--The Surface 
Transportation Board (in this section referred to as the ``STB'') shall 
develop a timeline and plan to implement the recommendations of the 
Inspector General of the Department of Transportation in Report No. 
FI2018002, including improvements--
            (1) to identify controls, including risk management, 
        weakness remediation, and security authorization;
            (2) to protect controls, including configuration management, 
        user identity and access management, and security training;
            (3) to detect controls, including continuous monitoring;
            (4) to respond controls, including incident handling and 
        reporting;
            (5) to recover controls for contingency planning; and
            (6) any additional tools that will improve the 
        implementation of the recommendations.

    (b) Implementation.--
            (1) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> In general.--Not later than 180 days 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the STB shall submit 
        the plan and timeline developed under subsection (a) to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Commerce of the Senate.
            (2) Report.--The STB shall report annually to such 
        Committees on the progress on implementation of the 
        recommendations until the implementation is complete.
            (3) <<NOTE: Designation.>> Plan implementation.--The STB 
        shall designate an individual to implement the plan developed 
        under subsection (a).

[[Page 132 STAT. 3764]]

SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts otherwise 
authorized.

    Approved October 16, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4921:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-622 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Apr. 10, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Presidential Documents

5053 

Federal Register 

Vol. 76, No. 18 

Friday, January 28, 2011 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of January 26, 2011 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Situation in or in Relation to Coˆte d’Ivoire 

On February 7, 2006, by Executive Order 13396, the President declared 

a national emergency, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to Coˆte d’Ivoire and ordered 

related measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to 

the conflict in Coˆte d’Ivoire. The situation in or in relation to Coˆte d’Ivoire, 

which has been addressed by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 1572 of November 15, 2004, and subsequent resolutions, has resulted 

in the massacre of large numbers of civilians, widespread human rights 

abuses, significant political violence and unrest, and fatal attacks against 

international peacekeeping forces. Because the situation in or in relation 

to Coˆte d’Ivoire continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national 

emergency declared on February 7, 2006, and the measures adopted on 

that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond 

February 7, 2011. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 13396. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 26, 2011. [FR Doc. 2011–2063 

Filed 1–27–11; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCO0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know**Official websites use .gov**A
              **.gov** website belongs to an official government
              organization in the United States.
        **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A
              **lock** (
              Locked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Skip navigation
  ADA HomeADA HistoryPart One: Origins of the ADAPart Two: Crafting the LawPart Three: The ADA Becomes LawAchieving the PromiseTools and TechHealth CareLearn, Work and PlayReal People
 Home
          ADA
          Real People, Real Stories
 Renita BundrageRenita Bundrage is President of People First of Georgia, a self-advocacy group...Renita Bundrage
                  Lydia X. Z. BrownLydia X. Z. Brown is an advocate, organizer, educator, strategist, and attorney...Photo of Lydia X. Z. Brown
                  Cliff PoetzCliff Poetz is a long-time leader in the movement towards self-advocacy and...Photo of Cliff Poetz
          Bernard BakerBernard Baker is president of Self Advocates Becoming Empowered (SABE), a...Photo of Bernard Baker
                  Nell KonecznyNell Koneczny is the accessibility and meetings coordinator for the American...Photo of Nell Koneczny
                  Stacy EllingenStacy Ellingen is a business owner, graphic designer, and disability advocate....Photo of Stacy Ellingen
          Derek AlexanderAfter experiencing vision loss, Derek realized he had to take the word "can't"...Photo of Derek Alexander
                  Josh BasileWhen he was 18, a spinal cord injury changed Josh’s life, but not his academic...Photo of Josh Basile
                  Teresa NguyenTeresa Nguyen is a Curriculum Development Specialist for the Colorado Office of...Photo of Teresa Nguyen
 Back to Top    More on the ADA
  

        
      ACL's 31st Anniversary of the ADA page
                      ADA.gov
                      ADA National Network
                      #ThanksToTheADA campaignSITE SUPPORT
  

        
      Home
                      Accessibility
                      Contact Us
                      Disclaimers
                      Freedom of Information Act
                      Privacy policy
                      Site Map
                      Viewers and PlayersRELATED SITES
  

        
      Administration for Community Living
                      HHS Office for Civil Rights
                      Department of Health and Human Services
                      CMS: Access to Care
                      No Fear Act (on HHS.gov)
                      Plain Writing (on HHS.gov)
                      USA.gov
                      White House
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**907 CA 13-02238**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

RACHEL HECKL, PERSONAL NEEDS GUARDIAN OF AIDA COREY, AN INCAPACITATED INDIVIDUAL, THOMAS J. COREY AND OLIVIA J. COREY, INTERIM CO-PROPERTY GUARDIANS OF AIDA COREY, AN INCAPACITATED INDIVIDUAL, AND PERMCLIP PRODUCTS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DANIEL M. WALSH, FRANK PANARO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, HSBC NORTH AMERICA, INC. AND HSBC BANK USA N.A., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BRADLEY A. HOPPE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLP, BUFFALO (BRENDAN H. LITTLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered April 10, 2013. The order, among other things, denied in part the motions of defendants Frank Panaro, HSBC North America, Inc. and HSBC Bank USA N.A., to dismiss the amended complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Heckl v Walsh ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 14, 2014]).

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)

                             AEROQUIP-VICKERS, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The assets and business of all subsidiaries listed below are included in the
1998 consolidated financial statements of the Registrant. In addition to those
named, 5 U.S. and 19 non-U.S. consolidated subsidiaries and 4 affiliated
companies that are accounted for by the cost and/or equity methods are not
disclosed. The undisclosed subsidiaries and affiliated companies in the
aggregate do not constitute a significant subsidiary.


                                         Incorporated or        Percent of
                                            Organized -       Voting Securities
          Company                         State or Country           Owned
----------------------------------       -----------------    -----------------
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.                      Ohio                  Registrant

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
Aeroquip Corporation                        Michigan                  100
Aeroquip International Inc.                 Delaware                  100
Vickers, Incorporated                       Delaware                  100
Vickers International Inc.                  Delaware                  100

Aeroquip A.G.                               Switzerland               100
Aeroquip do Brasil, S.A.                    Brazil                   99.5
Aeroquip Iberica S.A.                       Spain                     100
Aeroquip Inoac Company                      Michigan                   51
Aeroquip-Vickers International GmbH         Germany                   100

Aeroquip Ltd.                               Barbados                  100
A-VIC Ltd.                                  Barbados                  100
Aeroquip-Vickers Export Trading Company     Virgin Islands            100
Aeroquip-Vickers Inc.                       Canada                    100
Aeroquip-Vickers Limited                    United Kingdom            100

Aeroquip-Vickers Pte. Ltd.                  Singapore                 100
Aeroquip-Vickers Pty. Ltd.                  Australia                 100
Aeroquip-Vickers S.A.                       France                    100
Aeroquip-Vickers Sdn. Bhd.                  Malaysia                  100
Aeroquip-Vickers S.p.A.                     Italy                     100

Vickers do Brasil Ltda.                     Brazil                    100
Vickers Systems Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.      Singapore                 100
Vickers Systems International Ltd.          India                      51
Vickers Systems Limited                     Hong Kong                 100


                                      -81-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) VIRGINIA NOCE , et al. , ) ) Plaintiff s , ) )
v. ) Civil Action No

. 1 3

- 1133 (ABJ ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) Defendant

. )

____________________________________ )

ORDER
On September 18, 2014 , Magistrate Judge Alan Kay issued a Repo rt and
Recommendation [Dkt. # 16 ] with respect to plaintiffs ’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 9] and defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 8]. The report advised the parties “that under the provisions of Local Rule 72.3(b) of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, any party who objects to the Report and Recommendation must file a written objection thereto with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of the party’s receipt of this Report

and Recommendation.” September 18, 2014 Report and Recommendation at 19 . To date, no objections have been filed.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 16 ] i s ADOPTED in its entirety; it is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs ’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 9] is granted in part and denied in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 8] is

gra nted in part and deni ed in part.2 Specifically, it is ORDERED that:

• T he Hearing Officer’ s Determination that even if d efendant failed to comply with the Previous Hearing Officer’s Decision, this failure did not constitute a denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (“ FAPE ”) is reversed ;

• T he May 31, 2012, Individual Educational Program (“ IEP ”) meeting failed to remedy defendant ’s procedural violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) and resulted in an ongoing denial of a FAPE;

• T his denial of a FAP E justifies reimbursement for the cost of tuition at Lab School for a period between May 31, 2012, and April 11, 2013; 1

• T he Hearing Officer’s Determination that defendant committed a procedural violation of the IDEA by failing to conduct an annual review o f M.K

- N.’s IEP is upheld ;

• T he Hearing Officer’s Determination that this procedural violation did not constitute a denial of a FAPE is reversed ;

• T he Hearing Officer’s Determination that defendant did not deny M.K

- N. a FAPE by failing to issue prior written notice following the May 31, 2012, IEP meeting is upheld ; and

• T he Hearing Officer’s Determination denying alteration of M.K

- N.’s IEP to place M.K

- N. at Lab School and require defendant to prosp ectively fund M.K

- N.’s private education is upheld

.

AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge

DATE: October 6, 2014

1 Neither party has challenged the selection of May 31, 2012 as the operative date for determining the reimbursement period for M.K

- N

. ’s Lab School tuition costs

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           25000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 25000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   25000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3468
<OTHER-SE>                                       21532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     25000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (5000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  123006
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    118006
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
##### 



TO:
    
    _________
Wickliffe
  Dear _________:
    
    January 1, 2004
         1




---



##### 



THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATIONByW. G. Bares
Chief Executive Officer
 2




---



##### 



Three-yearCompound
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Restricted
    
    
    Restricted
    
    
    TotalGrowth Rate
    
    
    Payout
    
    
    Cash Award
    
    
    Shares
    
    
    Share Value
    
    
    PayoutCliffTarget200%300%
 3




---



##### 



(a)
    
    Determine the growth rate in operating EPS for each full year that has elapsed in the
3-year period as of the date of the Change of Control,(b)
    
    The 3-year cumulative operating EPS growth will be imputed as either the 1-year EPS
growth (if the Change of Controls occurs during the second year) or the 2-year cumulative
operating EPS growth (if the Change of Control occurs during the third year).(c)
    
    Payout is then pro-rated based on number of full months that have elapsed since the
date of this letter.
 4