### Name: Paul Sumal

Title: Environmental Officer Company: Rio Bravo Jasmin Sign Date: 8/7/2010 Name: Stafford D. Pease Title: Vice President Company: Delta air Quality Services, Inc. Sign Date: 8/7/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing

Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 1 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010 Facility Information:
Rio Bravo Jasmin 11258 Porterville Hwy

Bakersfield CA 93308 Contact: Paul Sumal Phone: 661-393-2278 Fax: 661-792-2812 Email: psumal@rbjasmin.com Testing Company: Delta Air Quality Services, Inc.
1845 N. Case St

Orange CA 92865 Contact: Stafford D. Pease Phone: 714 279 6777 Fax: Email: Staffordpease@deltaaqs.com

Air Permit Number: S-1751-3-13 Permitted Source ID/Name: Rio Bravo Jasmin 10768 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: 417.8 tn/dy Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: 17.4 tn/hr Target Process Test Rate 13 tn/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: The cogeneration facility consists of a fluidized bed combustor/boiler and ancillary equipment and a 36 megawatt electric generator. The boiler utilizes a baghouse and lime injection for the control of particulate matter and sulfur oxides and selective non-catalytic reduction for the control of nitrogen oxides. Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information: AFS #: 06029S1751 FRS #: 110000481675

SCC / Description 10100218 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Atmospheric Fluidized Bed Combustion: Circulating Bed (Bitum. Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Regulation Description Compound Limit Unit Section 114 Carbon Monoxide 0 lb/million BTU using O2 Section 114 Carbon Monoxide 0 ppm corrected Section 114 Total organic compounds (TOC) as Methane 0 lb/million BTU using O2 section 114 Total organic compounds (TOC) as Methane 0 ppm corrected

section 114 O2 0 percent(%) section 114 CO2 0 percent(%) section 114 Formaldehyde 0 lb/million BTU using O2 section 114 Formaldehyde 0 ppm corrected section 114 methane 0 lb/million BTU using O2 section 114 methane 0 ppm corrected



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 2 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.
n/a Test Parameter Information: Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width stack 93 8 2 4 0 12 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Custom methane 3 120 0 stack Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0 stack Formaldehyde Method 0011 3 120 0 stack Total organic compounds

(TOC) as Methane Method 25A 3 120 0 stack

O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0 stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0 stack



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 3 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location stack - Method 0011 Average Run Number 1-Form 2-Form 3-Form
Test Date 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 Run Start Time 8:00:00 AM 10:32:00 AM 12:56:00 PM

Run Finish Time 10:10:00 AM 12:34:00 PM 2:56:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 120 120 120 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 81.109 82.545 80.966 81.540 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.52 7.17 6.59 7.427 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Carbon Dioxide, % 14.8 14.87 14.88 14.850 Oxygen, % 4.74 4.79 4.72 4.750 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 269.25 272.17 272.25 271.223 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 97,155.1 97,510.6 96,469.6 97,045.100 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 150,095.1 149,047.8 146,557.1 148,566.667 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 101.6 101.167 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9655 9700 9681 9,678.667
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Location stack - Method 10 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 4 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010
Location stack - Method 25A Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Location stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 5 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010
Location stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 6 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data 

### Location: stack - Method 0011 Compound: Formaldehyde Average RunNumber 1-Form 2-Form 3-Form Mass_mg 0.00682 0.00732 0.00612 0.007 lb/mmBtuO2 2.31E-06 2.46E-06 2.08E-06 0.000 ppm 2.38E-03 2.51E-03 2.14E-03 0.002 ppm@7%O2 2.05E-03 2.17E-03 1.84E-03 0.002



### Location: stack - Method 10 Compound: Carbon Monoxide Average Run 1-co 2-co 3-co lb/mmBtuO2 5.23E-02 5.24E-02 5.18E-02 0.052 ppm 5.76E+01 5.73E+01 5.70E+01 57.300 ppm@7%O2 4.95E+01 4.94E+01 4.90E+01 49.300



### Location: stack - Method 25A Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as Average Run 1-voc 2-voc 3-voc lb/mmBtuO2 6.45E-04 7.02E-04 7.20E-04 0.001 ppm 1.24E+00 1.34E+00 1.38E+00 1.320 ppm@7%O2 1.07E+00 1.16E+00 1.19E+00 1.140



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 7 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010 Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 

### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Bituminous Coal Burned 13.4 Tons 13.5


### 2 Bituminous Coal Burned 13.3 Tons 13.5
3 Bituminous Coal Burned 13.4 Tons 13.5
1 nh3 inj 127.5 lb/hr 140


### 2 nh3 inj 138.4 lb/hr 140
3 nh3 inj 135.9 lb/hr 140
1 lime inj 8.49 klb/hr 8


### 2 lime inj 7.87 klb/hr 8
3 lime inj 7.87 klb/hr 8
1 mwatts 35.4 mw 36


### 2 mwatts 35.4 mw 36
3 mwatts 35.3 mw 36
1 steam flow 277 klb/hr 280


### 2 steam flow 277 klb/hr 280
3 steam flow 276.9 klb/hr 280

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 

### 1 BAGHOUSE 6.4 "WC 6
2 BAGHOUSE 6.4 "WC 6
3 BAGHOUSE 6.4 "WC 6


### 1 SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION FOR NOX 127.5 lb/hr 140

2 SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION FOR NOX 138.4 lb/hr 140



### 3 SELECTIVE NONCATALYTIC REDUCTION FOR NOX 135.9 lb/hr 140

Run Name Value UOM Comments 1 higher heating value 13073 btu/lb 

### 2 higher heating value 12956 btu/lb 3 higher heating value 13010 btu/lb 1 moisture 8.2 % 2 moisture 8.5 %



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 8 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010 3 moisture 8.4 % 

### 1 mercury 0.05 ppm 2 mercury 0.05 ppm 3 mercury 0.05 ppm 1 total selected metals 52 ppm 

### 2 total selected metals 51 ppm 3 total selected metals 41 ppm 1 chlorine 380 ppm 

### 2 chlorine 380 ppm 3 chlorine 320 ppm 1 fluorine 75 ppm 2 fluorine 75 ppm 

### 3 fluorine 90 ppm

Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 9 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location stack - Method 0011 Average Run Number 1-Form 2-Form 3-Form Test Date 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 4/27/2010 Run Start Time 8:00:00 AM 10:32:00 AM 12:56:00 PM Run Finish Time 10:10:00 AM 12:34:00 PM 2:56:00 PM Net Traversing Points 13 13 13 Net Run Time, minutes 120 120 120 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.244 0.246 0.244 0.245 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.002 1.002 1.002 1.002 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.15 29.15 29.15 29.150 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.93 1.91 1.85 1.897 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 83.120 86.290 85.310 84.907 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 70.79 81.42 85.63 79.280 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 81.109 82.545 80.966 81.540 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 160.5 135.6 121.4 139.167 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 7.55 6.38 5.71 6.547 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 8.52 7.17 6.59 7.427 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Dry Mole Fraction 0.9148 0.9283 0.9341 0.926 Carbon Dioxide, % 14.8 14.87 14.88 14.850 Oxygen, % 4.74 4.79 4.72 4.750 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.46 80.34 80.4 80.400 Fuel Factor 1.09 1.08 1.09 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.56 30.57 30.57 30.567 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.49 29.67 29.74 29.633 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.200 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.24 29.24 29.24 29.240 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 269.25 272.17 272.25 271.223 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.6448348760 5664 0.637191178

525731 0.617411859

715059 0.633
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 53.03 52.66 51.78 52.490 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 47.173 47.173 47.173 47.173 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 97,155.1 97,510.6 96,469.6 97,045.100 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 150,095.1 149,047.8 146,557.1 148,566.667 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 101.1 100.8 101.6 101.167 Percent Excess Air, % 28.7 29.2 28.6 28.833 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9655 9700 9681 9,678.667 Round Duct Diameter, inches 93 93 93 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 10 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010
Location stack - Method 10 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 11 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010
Location stack - Method 25A Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 12 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010
Location stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 13 of 14

### 2010 Rio Bravo Jasmin EPA ICR Testing
8/7/2010
Location stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Friday, February 18, 2011 Page 14 of 14