alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-061] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# SUMMARY:

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). The reports will be utilized by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to support services dependent upon accurate locator-type information. 

# DATES:

All comments should be submitted on or before July 30, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

All comments should be addressed to Ms. Lois Ryno, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771-001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports Officer, (202) 358-1223. 

*Title:*                         Locator and Information Services Tracking System (LISTS).                     

*OMB Number:*                         2700-0064.                     

*Type of review:*                         Extension.                     

*Need and Uses:*                         The LIST System is used primarily to support services on the Center dependent upon accurate locator-type information.                     

*Affected Public:*                         Individuals or households.                     

*Number of Respondents:*                         8,456.                     

*Responses Per Respondent:*                         1.                     

*Annual Responses:*                         8,456.                     

*Hours Per Request:*.083.                     

*Annual Burden Hours:*                         702.                               ( print page 34502)    

*Frequency of Report:*                         As required.                     

David B. Nelson, 

Deputy Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-13357 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
§ 780.817 Employees engaged in processing. Only those employees who are engaged in the processing will come within the exemption. The processing of sugarcane to which the exemption applies and in which the employee must be engaged in order to come within it is considered to begin when the processor receives the cane for processing and to end when the cane is processed “into sugar (other than refined sugar) or syrup.” Employees engaged in the following activities of a sugarcane processing mill are considered to be engaged in “the processing of” the sugarcane into the named products, within the meaning of the exemption: ( a ) Loading of the sugarcane in the field or at a concentration point and hauling the cane to the mill “if performed by employees of the mill.” (Such activities performed by employees of some other employer, such as an independent contractor, are not considered to be within the exemption.)
( b ) Weighing, unloading, and stacking the cane at the mill yard.
( c ) Performing sampling tests (such as a trash test or sucrose content test) on the incoming cane.
( d ) Washing the cane, feeding it into the mill crushers and crushing.
( e ) Operations on the extracted cane juice in the making of raw sugar and molasses: Juice weighing and measurement, heating, clarification, filtration, evaporating, crystallization, centrifuging, and handling and storing the raw sugar or molasses at the plant during the grinding season.
( f ) Laboratory analytical and testing operations at any point in the processing or at the end of the process.
( g ) Loading out raw sugar or molasses during the grinding season.
( h ) Handling, baling, or storing bagasse during the grinding season.
( i ) Firing boilers and other activities connected with the overall operation of the plant machinery during grinding operations, including cleanup and maintenance work and day-to-day repairs. (This includes shop employees, mechanics, electricians, and employees maintaining stocks of various items used in repairs.)
#### § 780.917 “Within the same State.”

To qualify for exemption under section 13(b)(16), the transportation of the fruits or vegetables must be made to the specified places “within the same State” in which the farm is located. Transportation is made to a place “within the same State” when the commodities are taken from the farm, hauled and delivered within the same State to first markets or first processors for sale or processing at the place of delivery. The exemption is not provided for transportation to any place of first marketing or first processing across State lines and does not apply to any part of the transportation within the State of fruits or vegetables destined for a place in another State at which they are to be first marketed or first processed. Transportation from the farm to an intermediate point in such a journey located within the same State would not qualify for exemption; it would make no difference that the intermediate point is a place of first marketing or first processing for other fruits or vegetables if it is not actually such for the fruits or vegetables being transported. On the other hand, where the place to which fruits or vegetables are transported from the farm within the same State is actually the place of first marketing or first processing of those very commodities, transportation of the goods across State lines by the first-market operator or first processor, after such delivery to him within the State, does not affect the nature of the delivery to him as one made within the State.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,130                  13,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,403                 139,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,801)                 (1,847)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,817                 163,082
<PP&E>                                          10,743                  10,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,081                 215,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,868                 155,453
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           124                     104
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,089                  60,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,081                 215,608
<SALES>                                         90,642                   3,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,642                   3,680
<CGS>                                         (82,176)                 (3,395)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (82,176)                 (3,395)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (35,349)                 (8,493)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,723)                   1,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,606)                 (7,140)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (469)                    (55)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,075)                 (7,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,087)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,162)                 (7,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.16)                  (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 17 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 17

   To make effective appointment of the Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To make effective appointment of the Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

    Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack Bryan, of Virginia, 
to be Deputy Senate Legal Counsel made by the President pro tempore 
this day is effective as of January 3, 2007, and the term of service of 
the appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hundred Eleventh 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 505.7 Failure to comply.

The Secretary's representatives shall maintain a list of those grantees who are considered to be responsible for instances of failure to comply with the obligation of the grantees specified in section 5(i) (1) and (2) and section 7(g) (1) and (2) of the Act, which are considered to have been willful or of such nature as to cast doubt on the reliability of formal assurances subsequently given and there shall be maintained a similar list where adjustment of the violations satisfactory to the Secretary was not properly made. Assurances from persons or organizations placed on either such list or any organization in which they have a substantial interest shall be considered inadequate for purposes of receiving further grants for a period not to exceed three (3) years from the date of notification by the Secretary that they have been placed on the lists unless, by appropriate application to the Secretary, they demonstrate a current responsibility to comply with section 5(i) (1) and (2) and section 7(g) (1) and (2) of the Act, and demonstrate that correction of the violations has been made.
#### § 778.401 Regulations issued under section 7(g)(3).

Regulations issued pursuant to section 7(g) (3) of the Act are published as Part 548 of this chapter. Payments made in conformance with these regulations satisfy the overtime pay requirements of the Act.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Luis Chang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of GSL Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of GSL Holdings, Inc.



                                      By:   /S/ LUIS CHANG
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Luis Chang, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

July 24, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00565

- CV

David MORA , Texas Sterling Construction Co. a/k/a Texas Crushed Concrete, and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. a/k/a Sterling Delaware Holding Company, Inc.

, Appellants

v.

Martin VALDIVIA Sr. and Maria Cervantes Valdivia, both Individually and as Sole Heirs of the Estate of Martin Valdivia Jr., Deceased,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, B exar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI09734 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After this court granted Appellants’ second motion for extension of time to file the brief,

we set Appellant s ’ brief due on July 30 , 2018. Before the due date, Appellant s filed an unopposed third motion for extension to file Appellant s ’ brief . Appellants request an additional

fourteen days.

Appellant s ’ motion is GRANTED. Appellant s’ brief is due on August 13, 2018

. Any further motion for extension of time to file Appellants’ brief will be disfavored

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. A lvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 24th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E . HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00113-CV

EMC Corporation, Appellant

v.

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of The State of Texas; and

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of The State of Texas, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-14-000851, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The parties have filed an agreed motion to extend the abatement of this appeal

pending the disposition of any petition for a writ of certiorari that seeks review of the Texas

Supreme Court’s decision in Graphic Packaging Corp. v. Glenn Hegar, No. 15-0669, 2017 WL

6544951 (Tex. Dec. 22, 2017). We grant the motion and extend the abatement of the appeal.

Further, appellant EMC Corporation is ordered to file a report with this Court as

to the status of this appeal on or before March 30, 2018. The failure to do so may result in the

reinstatement and then dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution.

It is ordered on February 16, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

             REVIEW REPORT ON INTERIM CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

To the Shareholders
Pick-Ups Plus, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet, statement of operations and
statement of cash flows of Pick-Ups Plus, Inc. as of March 31, 2000, and for the
three-month period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.





                                       /s/ LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX LLP
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX LLP

New York, New York
May 1, 2000
J5 ~ .A-bel. . AcosL ) CJe.rl~ 

Q.ouft" of CnMtV\o.{_ /l_,...p-e.cJ~ . ''T' MW Ol 2D15 

b e..o_.s:- ~I I 1 1\b ., ""\ ~ Ac()sta, Ct~rk 

""I l).)o..-S wo-nJ.-u-'"'1' ,f ~-u-~s ~c~ ~ 

~ ~~ crv-..- ~e.-- a.IDove.. nvyvJoue_J_ ~r-vt ~( · 

f.~ ~~\ L lof-t- -fo G_pr.. L l sfl- , .).o 15 

1 - l wo.....s je-n-e_ 

--F-~. ~~ 5 uN0& fo_ ~&~3o (Y)~\(::o.J.._ _ pu--oc_~clu~s, Whv--v 

fhc-.:t ~~p<€/Yis ) &f\ e.-'5 m~L \ s fowos-J--e..Jl · -fo --J-1rle.. ~l 

of Ufl'A-i~ he_ w~k +o &oc-'""-0 h, ~.jour~~ -G,, -~~ 

0\~tc..o..l Fc...e&Jrc... ~ l'he.re .. .f~.e_ } th-e- (Yic.(.AJ rs JJ~--wt , 

J~~d, posst\of~ [cd. _ 

---rh-e.- re.eLb~ -fk, s is ee....r-h"' ~ , 0 1e..cc:w s e.. Y 1Y'A-.. 

~-e.r~ d WV' Jc.ij"" ~e._ A. E. . D. r. It ) ~ J. rt \ -so \{ \ +oJ__ 

i+-d' -=L \-<~~ ~ lJJ1 tk ~e.... -hvvH~- e.x_ptre.d. ·!hv~ {>ce:_ 

·"'-.r oe..ul +o ~~ ,_p_ ~ o..-~ w~~ »~ ~ 

t':;:Q ~Pr ct J\)~ '"0 ~"- CA. f;,re_- M ~"""' .,_J._ ~s . Or 

J ~ !\'"-ieee. iJ.-!CL~ s~ +o M<::__ OV\_ ~ec· cJ:o<--L- tv\~ OV\ -e.&- Jo:t-c:. 'S ~ 

~ &.v.r- ~-etp 1"-.- fl, :5 ~-e. IS ((e-eQ-\ 3-

~v--e..-u~ .. 

$.\(\C0\{'~-, 

-{)~~
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 249 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 249

                 Honoring the life of Ruth Bell Graham.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2007

   Mrs. Dole (for herself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. McConnell) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                 Honoring the life of Ruth Bell Graham.

Whereas Ruth Bell Graham was born on June 10, 1920 in Qingjiang, China, the 
        daughter of Presbyterian medical missionaries;
Whereas Ruth Bell Graham returned to the United States to attend Wheaton 
        College, where she met and fell in love with her future husband, Billy 
        Graham, who would become one of the most acclaimed evangelists in the 
        world;
Whereas Ruth Bell Graham married Billy Graham on August 13, 1943 at Montreat 
        Presbyterian Church in her beloved Western North Carolina;
Whereas Ruth Bell Graham was the devoted mother of five children (Virginia, 
        Anne, Ruth, Franklin, and Nelson Edman) and the grandmother of 19 
        grandchildren;
Whereas Ruth Bell Graham was a renowned author and poet who penned 14 books that 
        have moved and inspired people around the globe;
Whereas Ruth Bell Graham and Billy Graham were recognized with the Congressional 
        Gold Medal in 1996 for their ``outstanding and lasting contributions to 
        morality, racial equality, family, philanthropy, and religion''; and
Whereas Ruth Bell Graham touched countless lives worldwide by sharing her 
        tremendous faith, her deep compassion for the less fortunate, her great 
        talents and her lighthearted wit: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors the life, work, and legacy of Ruth 
Bell Graham, a loyal companion who shined with grace and courage beside 
her husband Billy Graham, and a dedicated mother who fostered 
individuality and humility in her five children.
                                 <all>
```
(80 South. 132)

#### TOOLE v. STATE.

(3 Div. 319.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 19, 1918.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; A. B. Foster, Judge.

William J. Toole appeals from an adverse ruling in a prosecution against him.

Reversed and remanded.

Goodwyn & McIntyre, of Montgomery, for appellant.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., .for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The material question presented by this appeal has been acted upon in the case of Henry Kreutner v. State, 80 South. 125, in Supreme Court.

Upon the authority of that case, this cause is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 10.2

   DESCRIPTION OF ALEKSANDR CHUIKO VERBAL AGREEMENT WITH KARNET CAPITAL CORP.

Mr.  Chuiko,  the sole  officer  and  director  of  Karnet  Capital  Corp.  (the
"Company") has verbally  agreed to loan the Company funds  necessary to complete
the  registration  process on Form S-1,. The loan is unsecured and does not bear
interest  nor have a maturity  date or a repayment  provision or other terms and
conditions.


/s/ Aleksandr Chuiko
------------------------------
Aleksandr Chuiko -  May 25, 2014
#### § 780.155 Delivery “to carriers for transportation to market.”

The term “delivery * * * to carriers for transportation to market” includes taking agricultural or horticultural commodities, dairy products, livestock, bees or their honey, fur-bearing animals or their pelts, and poultry to any carrier (including carriers by truck, rail, water, etc.) for transportation by such carrier to market. The market referred to is the farmer's market which normally means the distributing agency, cooperative marketing agency, wholesaler, or processor to which the farmer delivers his products. As in the case of “delivery to market,” when it involves travel off the farm (as would normally be the case) the delivery must be performed by the farmer's own employees in order to constitute an agricultural practice. Employees of the carrier who transport to market the commodities which are delivered to it are not within the scope of agriculture.