34690 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 105 / Wednesday, May 31, 2000 / Notices

11 to complete the filing requirement for

one (1) new Customer of the Market

Rate Tariff under which Allegheny

Energy Supply offers generation

services.

Allegheny Energy requests a waiver of

notice requirements to make service

available as of December 1, 1999 to

PG&E Energy Trading—Power, L.P.

Copies of the filing have been

provided to the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio, the Pennsylvania

Public Utility Commission, the

Maryland Public Service Commission,

the Virginia State Corporation

Commission, the West Virginia Public

Service Commission, and all parties of

record.

Comment date: June 8, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. California Independent System

Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER00–2542–000]

Take notice that on May 8, 2000, the

California Independent System Operator

Corporation (ISO), tendered for filing a

Meter Service Agreement for Scheduling

Coordinators between the ISO and PG&E

Energy Trading—Power, L.P. for

acceptance by the Commission.

The ISO states that this filing has been

served on PG&E Energy Trading—

Power, L.P., and the California Public

Utilities Commission.

The ISO is requesting waiver of the

60-day notice requirement to allow the

Meter Service Agreement to be made

effective as of April 26, 2000.

Comment date: June 8, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. California Independent System

Operator Corporation

[Docket No. ER00–2543–000]

Take notice that on May 18, 2000, the

California Independent System Operator

Corporation, tendered for filing a

Participating Generator Agreement

between the ISO and Nuevo Energy

Company for acceptance by the

Commission.

The ISO states that this filing has been

served on Nuevo Energy Company and

the California Public Utilities

Commission.

The ISO is requesting waiver of the

60-day notice requirement to allow the

Participating Generator Agreement to be

made effective May 12, 2000.

Comment date: June 8, 2000, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest such filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of these filings are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection. This filing may also be

viewed on the Internet at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call

202–208–2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00–13489 Filed 5–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–6707–4]

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request; Implementation of

the Oil Pollution Act Facility Response

Plan Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this notice announces that

EPA is planning to submit the following

continuing Information Collection

Request (ICR) to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB):

Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act

Facility Response Plan Requirements,

EPA ICR No. 1630.03, OMB Control No.

2050–0135, expiring August 22, 2000.

Before submitting the ICR to OMB for

review and approval, EPA is soliciting

comments on specific aspects of the

proposed information collection.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before July 31, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Materials relevant to this

ICR may be inspected by visiting the

Public (Superfund) Docket, located at

1235 Jefferson Davis Highway (ground

floor), Arlington, Virginia 22202. The

docket number for this notice is SPCC–

12. The telephone number for the Public

Docket is (703) 603–9232. A reasonable

fee may be charged for copying docket

material. Comments on specific aspects

of the proposed information collection

notice should be addressed to the Public

Docket. The mailing address is:

Superfund Docket, U.S. EPA, Ariel Rios

Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

NW., Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Davis, (703) 603–8823.

Facsimile number: (703) 603–9116.

Electronic address:

davis.barbara@epa.gov. Note that

questions, but not comments, will be

accepted electronically. As noted above,

comments should be sent to the Public

Docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Affected Entities

The owner or operator of a facility

that is required to have a spill

prevention control and countermeasure

(SPCC) plan under the Oil Pollution

Prevention regulation (40 CFR part 112)

and that could cause ‘‘substantial harm’’

to the environment must prepare and

submit to EPA a facility response plan.

The criteria for a ‘‘substantial harm’’

facility include oil transfers over water

and a total storage capacity over 42,000

gallons; or total oil storage capacity over

one million gallons and insufficient

secondary containment, proximity to

sensitive environments, proximity to

drinking water supplies, or recent large

spills; or other factors considered by the

Regional Administrator. (See 40 CFR

112.20(b)(1) and (f) for further

information about the criteria for

‘‘substantial harm.’’)

The specific private industry sectors

subject to this action include, but are

not limited to: (1) Petroleum Bulk

Stations and Terminals (NAICS 42271);

(2) Electric Power Generation,

Transmission, and Distribution (NAICS

2211); (3) Gasoline Stations/Automotive

Rental and Leasing (NAICS 4471/5321);

(4) Heating Oil Dealers (NAICS 454311);

(5) Transportation, Pipelines, and

Marinas (NAICS 482–486/488112–

48819/4883/48849/492/71393); (6)

Grain and Oilseed Milling (NAICS

3112); (7) Manufacturing (NAICS 31–

33); (8) Warehousing and Storage

(NAICS 493); (9) Crude Petroleum and

Natural Gas Extraction (211111); (10)

Mining and Heavy Construction (NAICS

2121/2123/213114/213116/234); (11)

Schools (NAICS 6111–6113); (12)

Hospitals (622–623); (13) Crop and

Animal Production (NAICS 111–112);

and (14) Other Commercial Facilities

(miscellaneous).

Title

Implementation of the Oil Pollution

Act Facility Response Plan

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 105 / Wednesday, May 31, 2000 / Notices 34691

Requirements, OMB Control Number:

2050–0135. EPA Control Number:

1630.03. Expiration Date: August 22,

2000.

Abstract

The authority for EPA’s facility

response plan requirements is derived

from section 311 of the Clean Water Act,

as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of

1990. EPA’s regulation is codified at 40

CFR 112.20. Facility response plans

enhance EPA’s ability to protect

navigable waters and sensitive

environments from oil discharges, help

ensure that human health and safety are

protected in the vicinity of the facility,

and reduce the cost of spills to the

regulated community and society. EPA

is working to finalize proposed

revisions to the rule to differentiate

between animal fats and vegetable oils

and other oils (64 FR 17227–17267,

April 8, 1999).

Response Plan Certification

Under section 112.20(e), the owner or

operator of a facility that does not meet

the ‘‘substantial harm’’ criteria in

section 112.20(f)(1) must complete and

maintain at the facility the certification

form contained in Appendix C to part

112.

Response Plan Development

Under section 112.20(a) or (b), the

owner or operator of a facility that meets

the ‘‘substantial harm’’ criteria in

section 112.20(f)(1) must prepare and

submit to the EPA Regional

Administrator a facility response plan

(FRP) following section 112.20(h). Such

a facility may be a newly constructed

facility or may be an existing facility

that meets paragraph (f)(1) as a result of

a planned change (paragraph (a)(2)(iii))

or an unplanned change (paragraph

(a)(2)(iv)) in facility characteristics.

Under paragraph (c), the owner or

operator may be required to amend the

FRP.

Response Plan Maintenance

Under section 112.20(g), the owner or

operator must periodically review the

FRP to ensure consistency with the

National Oil and Hazardous Substances

Pollution Contingency Plan and Area

Contingency Plans. Under section

112.20(d), the facility owner or operator

must revise and resubmit revised

portions of the FRP after material

changes at the facility. FRP changes that

do not result in a material change in

response capabilities shall be provided

to the Regional Administrator as they

occur. Periodic drills and exercises are

required to test the effectiveness of the

FRP.

Recordkeeping

Under section 112.20(e), an owner or

operator who determines that the

requirements do not apply must certify

and retain a record of this

determination. An owner or operator

who is subject to the requirements must

keep the FRP at the facility (section

112.20(a)), keep updates to the FRP

(section 112.20(d)(1) and (2)), and log

activities such as discharge prevention

meetings, response training, and drills

and exercises (section 112.20(h)(8)(iv)).

Purpose of Data Collection

A facility-specific response plan will

help an owner or operator identify the

necessary resources to respond to an oil

spill in a timely manner. If implemented

effectively, the FRP will reduce the

impact and severity of oil spills and

may prevent spills because of the

identification of risks at the facility.

Although the owner or operator is the

primary data user, EPA also uses the

data in certain situations to ensure that

facilities comply with the regulation

and to help allocate response resources.

State and local governments may use

the data, which are not generally

available elsewhere and can greatly

assist local emergency preparedness

planning efforts.

EPA reviews submitted FRPs and

must approve FRPs for those facilities

whose discharges may cause

‘‘significant and substantial harm’’ to

the environment in order to ensure that

facilities believed to pose the highest

risk have planned for adequate

resources and procedures to respond to

a spill. (See 40 CFR 112.20(f)(3) for

further information about the criteria for

‘‘significant and substantial harm.’’)

Burden Statement

Burden means the total time, effort, or

financial resources expended by persons

to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose

or provide the information to or for a

Federal agency. This includes the time

needed to review instructions; develop,

acquire, install, and utilize technology

and systems to collect, validate, and

verify information, process and

maintain information, and disclose and

provide information; adjust methods to

comply with any new requirements and

instructions; train personnel to be able

to respond to a collection of

information; search data sources;

complete and review the collection of

information; and transmit or otherwise

disclose the information.

This notice provides the Agency’s

estimated burden to facilities to perform

the required actions. The burden to

regulated facilities is estimated in terms

of the labor cost and time (hours) spent

by facility personnel to review the rule,

determine if plan preparation is

required, and, if necessary, prepare and

maintain FRPs. The Agency developed

the burden hour estimates for facilities

based on consultations with engineers

familiar with Oil Pollution Prevention

compliance and with EPA Regional staff

involved directly with the

implementation of the program. The

burden hours calculated for each action

are taken from the current ICR, and EPA

anticipates using these burden hour

estimates in the ICR renewal. Costs are

from the current ICR, and the Agencycalculated labor wage rates are in 1996

dollars. In the supporting statement for

the ICR renewal, EPA will update these

rates for the different labor categories to

reflect current wage rates.

In 1999, EPA submitted an

Information Correction Worksheet to

OMB to reflect an Agency policy change

in how contractor costs are estimated.

EPA expects that many facilities will

use contractors to complete activities

associated with FRP preparation and

maintenance. Rather than including

these contractor costs as part of

operation and maintenance costs as the

Agency has done in the past, the

worksheet converts these contractor

costs to burden hours to reflect this

policy change. The approach for

estimating contractor costs used in the

1999 worksheet will also be used in the

ICR renewal.

Currently, approximately 5,500

existing facilities are assumed to be

regulated under the FRP requirements.

The owner or operator of each new

facility that is regulated under SPCC

requirements in 40 CFR part 112 must

read the FRP provisions in section

112.20 to determine whether or not the

facility fits the criteria for ‘‘substantial

harm.’’ EPA expects 4,355 new SPCCregulated facilities to make this

determination annually. Of those

facilities, approximately 65 of them will

fit the criteria for ‘‘substantial harm’’

and be required to submit an FRP. These

estimates for existing and new facilities

were made for the final year of the

current ICR, August 1999 to August

2000. Based on assumptions in the

current ICR, a one percent annual

growth in the number of SPCC-regulated

facilities and a 1.5 percent annual

growth in the number of FRP-regulated

facilities are expected.

In the current ICR and in the ICR

renewal, facilities are categorized

according to size and type of facility

operations. EPA’s small, medium, and

large size categories are based on the

volume of oil storage capacity at each

facility. Facilities fall into three

34692 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 105 / Wednesday, May 31, 2000 / Notices

additional categories based on how oil

is used at the facility: consumption of

oil as a raw material or end-use product

(storage/consumption); marketing and

distribution of oil as a wholesale or

retail good (storage/distribution); or

pumping oil from the ground as part of

exploration or production activities

(production).

An estimate of the number of existing

FRP-regulated facilities in 2000 is

shown in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 2 shows the

number of new facilities expected to

complete an FRP each year.

EXHIBIT 1.—NUMBER OF EXISTING FACILITIES MAINTAINING FRPS IN 2000

Model facility category

Facility size

Total

Small Medium Large

Storage/Consumption ...................................................................................................... 0 160 1,973 2,133

Storage/Distribution ......................................................................................................... 0 565 2,617 3,182

Production ........................................................................................................................ 0 215 .................... 215

Total .......................................................................................................................... 0 940 4,590 5,530

EXHIBIT 2.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL NUMBER OF NEW FACILITIES

Model facility category

Facility type

Total

Small Medium Large

Storage/Consumption ...................................................................................................... 0 2 23 25

Storage/Distribution ......................................................................................................... 0 7 31 38

Production ........................................................................................................................ 0 2 .................... 2

Total .......................................................................................................................... 0 11 54 65

Unit Burden Hour and Cost Estimates

In calculating the burden on all

facilities subject to the FRP

requirements, EPA uses a model-facility

approach to characterize the diverse

nature of regulated facilities. Facilities

are categorized according to size and

type of facility operations, based on the

methodology used in the current ICR.

The facility cost estimates for each

category of activities, based on the

Employment Cost Index (ECI) in terms

of 1996 dollars, are: $58.61 for

management, $40.17 for technical,

$18.32 for clerical, $33.33 for foreman,

and $22.22 for labor. In the supporting

document for the current ICR, the

Agency recognized that these wage rates

may underestimate the actual wages

received by some facility personnel but

overestimate the actual wage rate

received by other facility personnel.

These costs will be updated in the

supporting statement for the ICR

renewal.

Exhibit 3 provides EPA’s estimate of

the per-facility (‘‘unit’’) burden hours

and costs for personnel to read the

regulation, make a determination of

whether the FRP requirements apply to

the facility, and complete a certification

form as necessary. Most regulated

facilities already have made this onetime determination.

EXHIBIT 3.—UNIT BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS TO READ RULE, MAKE DETERMINATION, AND COMPLETE CERTIFICATION

Type of facility

Burden hours Cost

Management

($58.61)

Technical

($40.17)

Clerical

($18.32)

Total unit

burden Capital O&M Total unitcost

Small .................................................. 0.25 0 0 0.25 0 0 $15

Medium .............................................. 1 0 0.5 1.5 0 0 68

Large .................................................. 2 4 0.5 6.5 0 0 287

Exhibits 4 and 5 provide EPA’s

estimate of the unit burden hours and

costs required to become familiar with

the rule, and prepare an FRP,

respectively. The number of small

facilities expected to be required to

prepare a facility response plan is

assumed to be negligible. Initial

preparation of an FRP is a one-time

event for the owner or operator of a

facility. The burden and cost described

in Exhibits 4 and 5 would apply to

facilities who have not previously

submitted FRPs because they are new or

recently identified as being ‘‘substantial

harm’’ facilities.

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 105 / Wednesday, May 31, 2000 / Notices 34693

EXHIBIT 4.—ESTIMATED FIRST-YEAR UNIT BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS FOR FACILITIES REQUIRED TO PREPARE FACILITY

RESPONSE PLANS: RULE FAMILIARIZATION

Type of Facility

Burden hours Cost

Managerial

($58.61)

Technical

($40.17)

Clerical

($18.32)

Foreman

($33.33)

Labor

($22.22)

Total

unit

burden

Capital O&M

Total

unit

cost

Storage/Consumption:

Small ............................................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ......................................... 3 6 1 0 0 10 0 0 $ 435

Large ............................................. 4 8 1 0 0 13 0 0 574

Storage/Distribution:

Small ............................................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ......................................... 6 3 1 0 0 10 0 0 490

Large ............................................. 4 8 1 0 0 13 0 0 574

Production:

Small ............................................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ......................................... 3 6 1 0 0 10 0 0 435

Large ............................................. .................... .................. ................ ................ ................ ............ .............. ............ ............

EXHIBIT 5.—ESTIMATED FIRST-YEAR UNIT BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS FOR FACILITIES REQUIRED TO PREPARE FACILITY

RESPONSE PLANS: FRP PREPARATION

Type of facility

Burden hours Cost

Managerial

($58.61)

Technical

($40.17)

Clerical

($18.32)

Foreman

($33.33)

Labor

($22.22)

Total unit

burden Capital O&M Totalunit cost

Storage/Consumption:

Small ......................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ..................... 30.25 82.5 16.5 10 16 155.25 245 0 $6,323

Large ......................... 53.75 156.25 32.0 22 64 328 452 0 12,620

Storage/Distribution:

Small ......................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ..................... 34.75 92.5 17.5 10 16 170.75 250 0 7,012

Large ......................... 60.75 191.25 33.0 22 64 371 463 0 14,466

Production:

Small ......................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ..................... 23.25 73.5 12.5 10 16 135.25 240 0 5,473

Large ......................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ................ ................ ................ ................ ............ ..............

Exhibit 6 provides EPA’s estimate of

the unit burden hours and costs

required to maintain an FRP (i.e.,

subsequent year burdens following

initial year plan preparation burden).

FRP maintenance includes activities

such as completing records, conducting

exercises, and reviewing and updating

the FRP as necessary. The regulation

does not contain significant

recordkeeping requirements, but the

estimated burden hours for clerical

labor may include some recordkeeping

activities. The estimates in Exhibit 6

apply to existing facilities with response

plans.

EXHIBIT 6.—ESTIMATED UNIT BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS FOR MAINTAINING FACILITY RESPONSE PLANS

Type of facility

Burden hours Cost

Managerial

($58.61)

Technical

($40.17)

Clerical

($18.32)

Foreman

($33.33)

Labor

($22.22)

Total

unit burdenCapital O&M

Total

unit

cost

Storage/Consumption:

Small ............................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ........................... 7.5 18.5 2 10 16 54 0 0 $1,908

Large ............................... 15.0 45.0 8 22 64 154 0 0 4,989

Storage/Distribution:

Small ............................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ........................... 7.5 19.5 2 10 16 55 0 0 1,948

Large ............................... 17.0 58.0 10 22 64 171 0 0 5,665

Production:

Small ............................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ........................... 7.5 18.5 2 10 16 54 0 0 1,908

Large ............................... ...................... ...................... .................. .................. .................. .............. .............. ............ ............

34694 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 105 / Wednesday, May 31, 2000 / Notices

Total Annual Expected Facility Burden

and Cost

The total annual burden and cost for

all existing facilities and all new

facilities are shown in Exhibit 7. The

current ICR that was submitted to the

Office of Management and Budget

includes similar burden and cost

estimates for the first year of the current

ICR, however the annual burdens

presented in this notice are calculated

based on the third and final year of the

current ICR. Approximately 9,900

facilities are required to perform

activities in the final year of the current

ICR. Of these, over 4,300 new facilities

will incur a combined burden of 2,600

hours and $130,000 to become familiar

with the rule and determine that they

are not required to prepare such plans.

Each year approximately 65 new

facilities will determine that they are

required to prepare such plans and will

incur a combined burden of 21,000

hours and $850,000 to do so.

Approximately 5,500 existing facilities

are required to maintain existing plans

and will incur an annual combined

burden of about 800,000 hours and

$26,000,000 to do so.

EXHIBIT 7.—TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS FOR ALL NEW AND EXISTING FACILITIES

Type of facility

Burden hours Cost

Managerial

($58.61)

Technical

($40.17)

Clerical

($18.32)

Foreman

($33.33)

Labor

($22.22)

Total burden Capital O&M Total

Existing Facilities:

Small ......................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ..................... 7,050 17,955.0 1,880.0 9,400 15,040 51,325 0 0 $1,817,325

Large ......................... 74,084 240,571.0 41,954.0 100,980 293,760 751,349 0 0 24,671,998

New Facilities that are

Preparing FRPs:

Small ......................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medium ..................... 404.25 1,004.5 191.5 110 176 1,886.25 2,720 0 77,860

Large ......................... 3,335.5 9,954.5 1,813.0 1,188 3,456 19,747 24,749 0 769,771

New Facilities that are not

Preparing FRPs:

Small ......................... 868 0 0 0 0 868 0 0 54,345

Medium ..................... 805 0 402.5 0 0 1,207.5 0 0 55,360

Large ......................... 156 312.0 39.0 0 0 507 0 0 22,469

As part of the Agency’s efforts to

reduce the overall paperwork burden on

regulated facilities, EPA solicits

comments on how the Agency could

best reduce the total paperwork burden

hours for this rule while maintaining an

effective level of environmental

protection. EPA also solicits public

comments to: (i) evaluate whether the

proposed collection of information is

necessary for the proper performance of

the functions of the Agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility; (ii) evaluate the

accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the

burden of the proposed collection of

information, including the validity of

the methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be collected

and (iv) minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate technological

collection techniques.

No person is required to respond to a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number. The OMB control numbers for

EPA’s regulations are displayed at 40

CFR part 9. Send comments regarding

these matters, or any other aspects of the

information collection, including

suggestions for reducing the burden, to

the address listed under ADDRESSES near

the top of this document.

Dated: May 23, 2000.

Stephen D. Luftig,

Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial,

Response.

[FR Doc. 00–13560 Filed 5–30–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[SW–FRL–6707–3]

Notice of Final Decision on Request by

FMC Corporation for an Extension of

the Land Disposal Restrictions

Effective Date for Five Waste Streams

Generated at the Pocatello, Idaho

Facility

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final decision.

SUMMARY: The EPA is today approving

the request submitted by FMC

Corporation (FMC) for a one-year Caseby-Case (CBC) extension of the May 26,

2000, effective date of the RCRA land

disposal restrictions (LDRs) applicable

to hazardous wastes generated by FMC.

This action responds to the request

submitted by FMC, under the

procedures for case-by-case extensions

to an effective date, which allow any

person to request the Administrator to

approve, on a case-by-case basis, an

extension of the applicable effective

date of the LDRs. FMC requested the

CBC extension due to the lack of

available treatment capacity for five

waste streams and the need for

additional time to design, construct, and

begin operation of an on-site treatment

plant to treat those wastes. As discussed

in the notice of proposed decision (See

March 8, 2000), EPA concludes that

FMC has adequately made each of the

seven demonstrations required by

statute in order for EPA to approve a

CBC extension to the LDR effective date.

As a result of today’s action, FMC

Pocatello can continue to manage the

five subject wastes, as currently

managed in on-site surface

impoundments, until May 26, 2001,

without being subject to the LDRs

applicable to these wastes. If warranted,

EPA may grant a renewal of this

extension, for up to one year, which, at

a maximum, would extend the effective

date of the LDR for these wastestreams

to May 26, 2002.

DATES: This case-by-case extension

becomes effective on May 26, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The official record for this

action is identified as Docket Number

F–2000–FMCF–FFFFF. Public

comments and supporting materials are

available for viewing in the RCRA

Information Center (RIC), located at

Crystal Gateway I, First Floor, 1235

Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.