alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = LGA

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

10/19/2009 11:06:00

Query Parameters:
10/19/2009 11:06:00

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

LGA

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 120 

ACA AIR CANADA 35 

ASH MESA AIRLINES 6 

AWI AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION 84 

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 44 

CJC COLGAN AIRWAYS 30 

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 20 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 82 

COX# BRITT dba COA EXPRESS 8 

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 2 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 81 

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 101 

FFT FRONTIER AIRLINES 3 

FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 9 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 15 

JIA JETSTREAM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 12 

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 9 

MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 18 

NKS SPIRIT AIRLINES 22 

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 63 

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 128 

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 21 

SKW SKYWEST AIRLINES 2 

SWA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 15 

TCF SHUTTLE AMERICA 54 

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 33 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 41 

USA US AIRWAYS 80 

Page 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 23, 2015

t1020

Order 

Clerk

October 23, 2015

150615

THOMAS TIBBLE, Bankruptcy Trustee for the

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF ROBERT

PRODINGER, D.O., and STEPHEN L.

LANGELAND, Bankruptcy Trustee for the

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF BATTLE 

CREEK EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, P.C.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

DALE RUSSELL, P.C.,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 150615

COA: 306964

Calhoun CC: 2006-001805-CZ

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS CAPITAL INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
January 29, 2010

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161

SUBJECT: 2005 Petroleum Baseline Lifecycle GHG Calculations

This memorandum accompanies a spreadsheet on the docket that includes petroleum 

baseline lifecycle GHG emissions calculations. This spreadsheet contains five tabs. The 

first and second tabs document the well-to-tank, tailpipe, and well-to-wheels values for 

the gasoline baseline and the diesel baseline used for the final rule. The third and fourth 

tabs contain the tailpipe values for ethanol and biodiesel used for the final rule. The fifth 

tab contains our estimate of land-use change emissions from the conversion of Alberta 

forest for oil sands production.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER11-3322-000]

As indicated in the June 21, 2011 Notice in this docket, comments on the technical conference that was held on July 29, 2011, to discuss the performance measurement of demand response in PJM's capacity market, are due 15 days from the date of this conference, or Monday, August 15, 2011.

Dated: July 29, 2011.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-20045 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### § 2590.609-1 [Reserved]
•

# •

I 

# VI. Appendices

Oregon

.Departmentof

# Environmental Quality June 1994APPENDICES

-: New Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities 

### b. a. A - Compliance Assurance Agreement
. B - Oreqon Administrative Rule Ch.apter340, Divisions, 100-106,- 108-111,120, 135 .and 12
. \. C - Oregon Hazardous Wa,ste Statutes (ORS 466, 468) D - Oregon Hazardous Waste Policies: A Sampling. E - Agency'Organization Chart F' - Mpp' of Regional Offices G. -
.Howto Fill out a Chance to Comment Form H:- Flowcharts: General Permit Application process, 1.

### O~ervie~ 2. Authorization to Proceed Procedure 3. Land Us!,!'Compatibility Procedure 4. .Perrnlt Processing '·:Procedure's-.PCB/Hazar,dous Waste-New Treatmerit/Disposal Facilities / New Treatment/Disposal Facilities except New Hazardous Waste Treatment Facility Procedure ,.:-



# • , 5. Permittinq Procedures for New PCB/Hazardous Waste Storage Facilities 

### I - 

### J' -

## KL -

### MN - 

### 0- Oregon 1993 HazardousWaste Reporting Forms Part .A/Pa.rt B Permit Revie,!" Checklist Hazardous Waste Training Matrix Small Quantity Generator Handbook

, ., t Small Businesses and Hazardous Waste: What you .Should Know. Assorted Fact Sheets (Sampling) Environmental Cleanup Manual I. (Lawand Rules forthe Discovery, Investigation and Cleanup ofSites

## Co~taminated . bv.Hazardous Substances) r: . , 

# .'

)
|      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (i)  | this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 26, 2010 ("Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
| (ii) | the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated for the periods presented in the Annual Report.   |

|                         |        |                                         |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| /s/ Mary E. Junck       |   | /s/ Carl G. Schmidt                     |
| Mary E. Junck           |   | Carl G. Schmidt                         |
| Chairman, President and |   | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | and Treasurer                           |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ITEM 8 OF THIS FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,100
<INVENTORY>                                     83,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,838
<PP&E>                                       1,855,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                 850,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,263,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,520
<BONDS>                                        547,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,515
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,263,343
<SALES>                                        753,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               753,244
<CGS>                                          666,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  666,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,152)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 552.108 Child labor provisions.

Congress made no change in section 12 as regards domestic service employees. Accordingly, the child labor provisions of the Act do not apply unless the underaged minor (a) is individually engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or (b) is employed by an enterprise meeting the coverage tests of sections 3(r) and 3(s)(1) of the Act, or (c) is employed in or about a home where work in the production of goods for commerce is performed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 98 (Friday, May 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on June 6, 2000, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, June 6, 2000-1:00 p.m. until the conclusion of business

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: May 15, 2000.
Richard K. Major,
Acting Associate Director for Technical Support, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 00-12622 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 4231.16 Participant census data for financial assistance merger. A request for a financial assistance merger must include a copy of the census data used for the projections described in § 4231.15(c) through (e), including: ( a ) Participant type (retiree, beneficiary, disabled, terminated vested, active, alternate payee).
( b ) Gender.
( c ) Date of birth.
( d ) Credited service for guarantee calculation (*i.e.,* number of years of participation).
( e ) Vested accrued monthly benefit.
( f ) Monthly benefit guaranteed by PBGC.
( g ) Benefit commencement date (for participants in pay status and others for which the reported benefit will not be payable at normal retirement age).
( h ) For each participant in pay status— ( 1 ) Form of payment, and
( 2 ) Data relevant to the form of payment, including: ( i ) For a joint-and-survivor benefit, the beneficiary's benefit amount and the beneficiary's date of birth;
( ii ) For a Social Security level income benefit, the date of any change in the benefit amount, and the benefit amount after such change;
( iii ) For a 5-year certain or 10-year certain benefit (or similar benefit), the relevant defined period; or
( iv ) For a form of payment not otherwise described in this section, the data necessary for the valuation of the form of payment.
( i ) If an actuarial increase for postponed retirement applies, or if the form of annuity is a Social Security level income benefit, the monthly vested benefit payable at normal retirement age in normal form of annuity.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1178

Geophysical Data from offshore of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, Cat Island to Western Horn Island, Mississippi

----

## Data Acquisition and Processing

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
V-Boom

Reduce heat radiation and fire risk

from burners to an offshore rig and personnel

APPLICATIONS

■ Use for North Sea operations.

■ Provide support for the burner

and piping.

■ Allow access to the burner

and piping.

BENEFITS

■ Reduce heat radiation.

■ Protect rig personnel.

■ Limit burner noise on the rig.

FEATURES

■ Modular triangular design

■ Suitable for H2

S service

■ Available in two or three 

sections

■ Piping for oil, water with filter,

air with check valve, and pilot

light lines, in addition to one

gas flare line

■ Peacock-tail water screen

A TRIANGULAR MODULAR BOOM DESIGN FOR NORTH SEA FLARING OPERATIONS

Burners are designed to dispose of oil produced at the surface during offshore well tests, but the flares must

be kept at a safe distance from the rig. To limit the heat radiation onto an offshore platform or drillship and 

to protect rig personnel, the burners are supported by long booms. 

The V-boom, designed for use in the North Sea, is a heavy-duty triangular modular design. A two-section 

V-boom measures approximately 18 m [60 ft] in length. Adding an intermediate section increases the boom

length to about 26 m [85 ft]. 

The heavy-duty design allows the V-boom to withstand winds to 161 km/h [100 mi/h] and an ice thickness 

to 5 cm [2 in]. The piping is positioned laterally below the gangway. 

The V-boom is mounted on the rig with a rotating base plate and guy lines. Horizontal guy lines are used 

to orient the boom; vertical guy lines fixed to the rig’s main structure support the boom. The rotating base

enables horizontal and vertical positioning of the boom and burner. When the boom axis is positioned 

slightly above horizontal, oil left in the piping after flaring operations will not leak out and cause pollution. 

To ensure nonhazardous burning in changing wind directions, two V-booms are typically installed on 

opposite sides of the drilling platform or drillship. 

Gas line

Water line

Air line

Pilot line

Pilot

cable

Water screen

Oil line

Gas line (optional)

V-boom.
07-WT-054 November 2007 

Copyright © 2007 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.

V-Boom

www.slb.com/welltesting

Specifications

Model UBB-A UBB-B

Service H2S H2S

Length, m [ft] 26 [85] 18 [60]

Width, m [ft] 1.1 [3.6] 1.1 [3.6]

Weight, kg [lbm] 7,700 [16,980] 5,300 [11,680]

Working temperature, degC [degF] –20 to 100 [–4 to 212] –20 to 100 [–4 to 212]

Dynamic conditions

Lateral wind velocity, km/h [mi/h] 161 [100] 161 [100]

Ice thickness, cm [in] 5 [2] 5 [2]

Connections, Fig. 602 female/male

Air, mm [in] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4]

Oil, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3]

Gas†, mm [in] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4]

Water, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3]

Applicable codes ASME‡, B31.3, DNV§ NPD†† ASME B31.3, DNV, NPD

† Optional 101.6 [4-in] and 152.4-mm [6-in] gas line connections are available.

‡ American Society of Mechanical Engineers

§ Det Norske Veritas

†† Norwegian Petroleum Directorate
#### § 520.200 What is the legal authority for payment of wages lower than the minimum wage required by section 6(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act?

Section 14(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act provides, in order to prevent curtailment of employment opportunities, for the payment of special minimum wage rates to workers employed as messengers, learners (including student-learners), and apprentices under special certificates issued by the Department of Labor.
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-2772

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Donald Larkin, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 29, 1995 Filed: January 19, 1996

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Donald Larkin, Jr., an African-American, appeals the 181-month sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine base (crack) and cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possessing a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We affirm.

Following the preparation of his presentence report, Larkin objected to his offense-level calculation. Larkin contended that no scientific difference existed between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, and that the penalty provisions set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) were thus rendered inapplicable by operation of the rule-2- of lenity. He also argued that Congress enacted section 841(b) in an arbitrary and irrational manner, resulting in a disparate impact upon African-Americans in violation of his due process and equal protection rights.

Larkin relied on United States v. Davis , 864 F. Supp. 1303 (N.D. Ga. 1994), appeal pending(No. 95-8057 11th Cir.), in which the district court, after an evidentiary hearing, held that the terms "cocaine" and "cocaine base" were synonymous; that the penalty provisions of section 841(b) set forth a scientifically meaningless distinction between cocaine and cocaine base; and that the heightened penalties for cocaine base must be ignored by operation of the rule of lenity. 864 F. Supp. at 1309. In support, Larkin submitted copies of the Davis court records-- including Davis's memorandum of law, the hearing transcript, and the district court's decision. Larkin renews his claims on appeal.

We conclude Larkin's rule-of-lenity argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Jackson , 64 F.3d 1213, 1219-20 (8th Cir. 1995), and his due process and equal protection arguments are foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Jackson , 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995). We need not address Larkin's contention that a "less deferential" or "heightened" rational-basis test applies, because he did not raise this argument below and there is no plain error. See Fritz v. United States , 995 F.2d 136, 137 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 887 (1994).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.-3- A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.),  notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections  552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the  discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications,  the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         September 9, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health,  5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892,  (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Camilla E. Day, PhD,  Scientific Review Officer,  CIDR,  National Human Genome Research Institute,  National Institutes of Health,  5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075,  Bethesda, MD 20892,  301-402-8837,                         *camilla.day@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research,  National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 9, 2011.

Anna P. Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-20688 Filed 8-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P