alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. No. 35,308 4 GUSTAVO R. ROMERO, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Michael E. Martinez, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Jeffrey Romero 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellant 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION 15 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 162 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposi ng summary dismissal has been filed, 2 and the time for doing so has expired. 3
{2} Dismissed. 4
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6

_______________________________________ 7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 8 WE CONCUR: 9

10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 11

12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 13
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Michael F. Holloran, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elgrande International, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to  the period covered by this quarterly report; and



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



/s/ Michael F. Holloran

---------------------------------------

Michael F. Holloran, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Date: April 26, 2006
Exhibit 10.17


 


Summary to the 2015 Addendum of the Lease
Agreement 


 


		1.1.	In January 31 2015, the parties amended the lease agreement to extend the term of the lease agreement,
pursuant to all amendments to the lease agreement, for an additional period of 48 months, commencing from February 1, 2015, subject
to the same terms as the lease agreement including the amendments thereto.
	 	 	 
		1.2.	The Lessee shall pay a monthly lease payment and building management fees in accordance with the
terms set forth in the license agreement as amended.
	 	 	 
		1.3.	Notwithstanding this Agreement and amendments thereto, the Lessor and the Lessee agreed that the
following insurance provisions shall be applied to the Agreement:



 


Insurance
by Lessee – the preexisting terms pertaining to insurance of the Lease Agreement and amendments thereto, shall be replaced
as follows:


 


		(a)	The Lessee shall, at its own expense, purchase and keep in force the following insurance policies
with a recognized and duly authorized insurance company:



 


		(i)	Insurance during construction in the premises and for a period of 12 months following such construction
in the premises conducted by the Company or by an independent contractor on behalf of the Company, including materials and any
other equipment or facilities required for the performance of such construction, and applied to the property under construction
or in proximity thereof, for an amount of no less than a sum of $250,000. The insurance policy shall include coverage for the removal
of rubble for an amount of no less than a sum of $100,000.



 


		(ii)	Third Party Liability Insurance for an amount of no less than a sum of $1,000,000.



 


		(iii)	Employers Liability Insurance for an amount of no less than a sum of $5,000,000.



 


Insurance
by Lessor


 


		(b)	The Lessor shall expand the insurance policies pursuant to the Lease Agreement and amendments thereto
to include coverage for damages as a result of fire, water weather and by third parties.
§ 458.65 Procedures following actionable complaint. ( a ) If the Chief, DOE concludes that there is probable cause to believe that a violation has occurred which may have affected the outcome and which has not been remedied, he shall proceed in accordance with §§ 458.66 through 458.92.
( b ) The challenged election shall be presumed valid pending a final decision thereon as hereinafter provided in §§ 458.66 through 458.92, and in the interim the affairs of the organization shall be conducted by the officers elected or in such other manner as its constitution and bylaws may provide.
( c ) When the Chief, DOE supervises an election pursuant to an order of the Administrative Review Board issued under § 458.70 or § 458.91, he shall certify to the Administrative Review Board the names of the persons elected. The Administrative Review Board shall thereupon issue an order declaring such persons to be the officers of the labor organization.
[45 FR 15158, Mar. 7, 1980. Redesignated and amended at 50 FR 31311, 31313, Aug. 1, 1985; 62 FR 6094, FEb. 10, 1997; 78 FR 8026, Feb. 5, 2013; 81 FR 33389, May 26, 2016]
Exhibit 4.49

 

English Translation

 

Supplementary Agreement on Interactive Entertainment Marketing Cooperation Agreement

 

CN: TJKS-OS-2014-089-Supplementary

 

This agreement is concluded and signed by the following two parties on September 15, 2014:

 

Party A: Shanghai Qinhe Internet Technology Software Development Co., Ltd

 

Party B: Kusheng (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd

 

Whereas, both parties concluded and signed the Interactive Entertainment Agreement (Numbered TJKS-OS-2014-089, hereinafter referred to as “Original Contract”) on May 4, 2014. Now, the two parties hereof, with regard to the modification on the terms of Original Contract, reach the supplementary terms as follows by consensus:

 

1.                                      Both parties, on the basis of the agreed terms of Original Contract, agree to add the following cooperation contents: Party B should provide Party A with the channel named “is how real-time video broadcast”(domain name: is how. ku6. com) (hereinafter referred to as “Cooperation Channel”)for the use of Party A; and Party A, based on the domain name, master station entrance of the Cooperation Channel (hereinafter referred to as “Resource Costs”) provided by Party B, is responsible for setting up the Cooperation Channel (including bandwidth, server etc.) and the normal operation of this channel; in consideration of increase of the cooperation contents, both parties agree to make corresponding alteration in respect of the clause of revenue sharing contained in the Original Contract, for details see Annex of this Supplementary Agreement.

 

2.                                      Change Paragraph 1, Article Ten of the Original Contract into: 1. The valid term of this cooperation commences on May 4, 2014 and ends on December 31, 2015.

 

3.                                      Both parties agree to implement the Supplementary Agreement and relevant terms of the Original Contract within the term of cooperation.

 











 

4.                                      Other terms of Original Contract remains unchanged and continues to keep effective.

 

Both parties confirm that if any term of this Supplementary Agreement is inconsistent with the terms of the Original Contract, this Supplementary Agreement shall prevail. Any matter not covered herein should be implemented in accordance with Original Contract.

 

5.                                      This agreement shall come into effect from the date of signature and seal by both Parties. This agreement shall be in four counterparts, with each party holding two counterparts respectively, and each counterpart shall have the same legal effect.

 

6.                                      The effect of this Supplementary Agreement shall be retroactive to July 1, 2014.

 

Party A:   Shanghai Qinhe Internet Technology Software Development Co., Ltd

 

(Stamp) [seal]

 

Party B:   Kusheng (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd

 

(Stamp)[seal]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 97 (Thursday, May 18, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 31533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-12464]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Security Education Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Defense University, National Security Education 
Program, Department of the Army.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the 
Secretary of Defense concerning requirements established by the David 
L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VII of Public Law 102-
183, as amended.

DATES: June 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The Crystal City Marriott Hotel, 1999 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Edmond J. Collier, Deputy Director 
for Programs, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson 
Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. 
Electronic mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5c505353565a4d5a7f515b4a115a5b4a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aecdc1c2c2c7cbdccbeec0cadb80cbcadb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-12464 Filed 5-17-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 199 

Calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Dr. Haleh Esfandiari. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2007 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Dr. 

Haleh Esfandiari. 

Whereas Dr. Haleh Esfandiari is one of the United States 

most distinguished analysts of Iranian politics and is the 

Director of the Middle East Program at the Woodrow 

Wilson International Center for Scholars; 

Whereas Dr. Esfandiari is a dual citizen of Iran and the 

United States; 

Whereas Dr. Esfandiari has served as a communications 

bridge between the United States and Iran, advocating 

diplomacy and dialogue; 

Whereas Dr. Esfandiari travels to Iran twice a year to visit 

with her mother; 

Whereas, in late December 2006, Dr. Esfandiari traveled to 

Iran to visit her ailing 93 year old mother for 1 week; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 199 IS 

Whereas the current Iranian President, Mahmoud 

Ahmadinejad, has initiated a crackdown on scholars and 

journalists including Dr. Esfandiari, Canadian-Iranian 

philosopher Ramin Jahanbegloo, and journalist Parnaz 

Azima; 

Whereas, on December 30, 2006, Dr. Esfandiari was robbed 

of her Iranian and American passports and travel documents at knife-point by 3 masked men on the way to the 

airport to return to the United States; 

Whereas Dr. Esfandiari was held in Iran under house arrest 

for 4 months, interrogated under conditions of intimidation and threat, and, on May 8, 2007, was imprisoned in 

the notorious Evin prison in Tehran; 

Whereas Dr. Esfandiari has been falsely accused by a news 

agency in Iran of being a spy for Mossad, of serving as 

the head of the Iran section of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and of encouraging an uprising 

against the regime in Tehran; and 

Whereas senior government officials have conveyed the 

United States opposition to this unjustified imprisonment: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) condemns the arrest, interrogation, and im3 prisonment of Dr. Haleh Esfandiari as a deliberately 

4 provocative and illegal act; 

5 (2) deplores the continuing crackdown in Iran 

6 on journalists and scholars and the deliberate dis7 semination of misinformation regarding their activi8 ties; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•SRES 199 IS 

1 (3) demands the immediate, safe, and uncondi2 tional release of Dr. Haleh Esfandiari from custody, 

3 the reissuance of appropriate travel documents for 

4 Dr. Esfandiari, and the provision of safe passage out 

5 of Iran. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### Beauchamp *vs*White.

Appeal from the Nelson Circuit.

Chancery.-

*Case*113.

¥ha case stated.

*Specific performance. Unconscientious bargain.*

*June*20.

Chief Justice Ewihg

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a bill filed by the appellee to enforce specifically, a purchase made by White, of a tract *527of land under executions in favor of White *et al.*vs the Beauchamps, and which land White afterwards purchased at a small price, under a second execution.

A creditor purchased a tract of land under his own execution, and refused to comply with the terms of the sale, afterwards purchased at a second sale, at a reduced price— Held that lie could not hold under the last purchase, but that so much of the land should be re-sold as ■would pay the debt, &c.

The Chancellor properly refused to interfere under the facts appearing in the record, .to enforce specifically, the purchase under the first sale. But the defendant, White, •ought not to be permitted to hold the land at the sacrifice at which he purchased at the second sale. It would not be equitable to hllow him to do so, as the probability is, indeed it is obvious, that he must have acquired it at so great a sacrifice, by reason of its embarrassed condition, produced by his first purchase and refusal to comply with the same. This circumstance, together with the fact that White assents to the redemption under the last sale, and expresses himself willing to receive the money due him, authorized the Chancellor to allow the redemption. But instead of decreeing the sale of the land for the small sum bid at the last sale, and dissolving the injunction as to the residue of the judgment, as the Chancellor had possession of the whole subject, he should have rescinded the second purchase and ordered a sale of the whole tract, or so much thereof as would suffice, in satisfaction of the entire residue of the judgment, as well as of the amount bid at *the*second *parchase, with interest,*retaining the cause upon the docket, and the injunction, until .the sale was effected and the report thereof made to the Court. And if the whole amount of both demands was mot made, then dissolving the injunction as to the residue only, of the amount of the judgment not made. To allow a sale of the land for the small sum of $100, while the execution for the residue of the judgment was let loose against the complainants, was calculated to produce a sacrifice and do injury to the complainants. If the land was bought to,o high under the-first sale, and for this and other causes, ought not to be specifically enforced, .and at a sacrifice under the second sale, by reason of its embarrassed condition, it was equitable for the Chancellor to remove the embarrassments arising from either, and to decree a sale pf the land, discharged of those incumbrances, in satisfaction of so much of the entire de*528rnand, as it would command, and then to dissolve the injunction as to the residue of the judgment.

*Harlan Craddock*for appellant: *Grigsby*for appellee.

The decree of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed and cause remanded, that a decree may be rendered as indicated.
§ 780.206 Planting and lawn mowing. ( a ) The planting of trees and bushes is within the scope of agriculture where it constitutes a step in the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of agricultural or horticultural commodities, or where it constitutes a practice performed by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with farming operations (as where it is part of the subordinate marketing operations of the grower of such trees or bushes). Thus, employees of the nurseryman who raised such nursery stock are doing agricultural work when they plant the stock on private or public property, trim, spray, brace, and treat the planted stock, or perform other duties incidental to its care and preservation. Similarly, employees who plant fruit trees and berry stock not raised by their employer would be considered as engaged in agriculture if the planting is done on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with the farming operation on that farm.
( b ) On the other hand, the planting of trees and bushes on residential, business, or public property is not agriculture when it is done by employees of an employer who has not grown the trees and bushes, or who, if he has grown them, engages in the planting operations as an incident, not to his farming operations, but to landscaping operations which include principally the laying of sod and the construction of pools, walks, drives, and the like.
( c ) The mowing of lawns, except where it can be considered incidental to farming operations, is not agricultural work.
# AGENCY:

 Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

 Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

 In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request for review of a revised information collection. RI 30-9, Reinstatement of Disability Annuity Previously Terminated Because of Restoration to Earning Capacity, informs former disability annuitants of their right to request restoration under title 5, U.S.C., Section 8337. It also specifies the conditions to be met and the documentation required for a person to request reinstatement. 

Approximately 200 forms are completed annually. The form takes approximately 60 minutes to respond, including a medical examination. The annual estimated burden is 200 hours. Burden may vary depending on the time required for a medical examination. 

For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, or E-mail to mbtoomey@opm.gov. 

# DATES:

 Comments on this proposal should be received on or before February 22, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

 Send or deliver comments to—

Ronald W. Melton, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415

and

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 

# FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION—CONTACT: 

Phyllis R. Pinkney, Management Analyst Budget & Administrative Services Division (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Janice R. Lachance, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-1340 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLIING CODE 6325-01-U
§ 520.201 How are those classifications of workers which may be paid subminimum wages under section 14(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act defined? ( a ) A messenger is a worker who is primarily engaged in delivering letters and messages for a firm whose principal business is the delivery of such letters and messages.
( b ) A learner is a worker who is being trained for an occupation, which is not customarily recognized as an apprenticeable trade, for which skill, dexterity and judgment must be learned and who, when initially employed, produces little or nothing of value. Except in extraordinary circumstances, an employee cannot be considered a “learner” once he/she has acquired a total of 240 hours of job-related and/or vocational training with the same or other employer(s) or training facility(ies) during the past three years. An individual qualifying as a “learner” may only be trained in two qualifying occupations.
( c ) A student-learner is a student who is at least sixteen years of age, or at least eighteen years of age if employed in an occupation which the Secretary has declared to be particularly hazardous, who is receiving instruction in an accredited school, college or university and who is employed on a part-time basis, pursuant to a “bona fide vocational training program” as defined in subpart C of this part.
( d ) An apprentice is a worker, at least sixteen years of age unless a higher minimum age standard is otherwise fixed by law, who is employed to learn a skilled trade through a registered apprenticeship program. Training is provided through structured on-the-job training combined with supplemental related theoretical and technical instruction. This term excludes pre-apprentices, trainees, learners, and student-learners. The terms learner and student-learner are defined in subpart C of this part. Standards governing the registration of apprenticeship programs are established and administered by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training (BAT) and are found in Regulations, 29 CFR Part 29.
( e ) Additional terms used in this part are defined in subpart C of this part.