alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas women of all backgrounds have the power to greatly 

reduce their risk of common diseases through preventive 

measures, such as leading a healthy lifestyle that includes 

engaging in regular physical activity, eating a nutritious 

diet, and visiting a healthcare provider to receive regular 

check-ups and preventative screenings; 

Whereas significant disparities exist in the prevalence of disease among women of different backgrounds, including 

women with disabilities, African-American women, AsianPacific Islander women, Latinas, and American IndianAlaska Native women; 

Whereas healthy habits should begin at a young age; 

Whereas preventive care saves Federal dollars designated for 

health care; 

Whereas it is important to educate women and girls about 

the significance of awareness of key female health issues; 

Whereas the offices of women’s health within the Department 

of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, and the Agency 

for Healthcare Research and Quality are vital to providing critical services that support women’s health re-
2

•SCON 81 ES 

search and education and other necessary services that 

benefit women of all ages, races, and ethnicities; 

Whereas National Women’s Health Week begins on Mother’s 

Day each year and celebrates the efforts of national and 

community organizations that work with partners and 

volunteers to improve awareness of key women’s health 

issues; and 

Whereas in 2008, the week of May 11 through May 17 is 

dedicated as National Women’s Health Week: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the importance of preventing dis4 eases that commonly affect women; 

5 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

6 Women’s Health Week; 

7 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

8 use National Women’s Health Week as an oppor9 tunity to learn about health issues that face women; 

10 (4) calls on the women of the United States to 

11 observe National Women’s Check-Up Day on May 

12 12, 2008 by receiving preventive screenings from 

13 their healthcare providers; and 
3

•SCON 81 ES 

1 (5) recognizes the importance of Federally 

2 funded programs that provide research and collect 

3 data on diseases that commonly affect women. 

Passed the Senate May 7, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 81

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of National 

Women’s Health Week.
#### § 22.40 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the authority head a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, the authority head shall stay the process immediately. The authority head may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
§ 776.28 Covered preparatory activities. ( a ) *Before production begins.* ( 1 ) The United States Supreme Court has held that the Act is applicable to employees of a company which was engaged in preliminary oil well drilling, even though the holes were drilled to a specified depth which was short of where the oil was expected to be found.[26] The Act would also apply to drilling operations even though no oil was discovered.[27] Laborers employed in erecting drilling rigs would also be covered.[28] Other preparatory work before drilling begins in an oil field, such as staking oil claims, surveying, clearing the land, assembling materials and equipment, erecting sheds, derricks or dikes would also be within the scope of the Act.[29] Preliminary work such as the foregoing has the requisite close and immediate tie with the production of goods for commerce to be within the coverage of the Act.
( 2 ) Similarly, coverage extends to employees engaged in the installation of machinery to be used in covered production in a new factory building, even though the construction of the building itself may not have been subject to the Act. Such installation is considered to be a preliminary production activity rather than simply part of the construction of the building.
( 3 ) If the construction project is subject to the Act, preliminary activities, such as surveying, clearing, draining and leveling the land, erecting necessary buildings to house materials and equipment, or the demolition of structures in order to begin building the covered facility, are subject to the Act.[30]
( b ) *Facilities used in aid of the covered construction.* The installation of facilities, and the repair and maintenance of trucks, tools, machinery and other equipment to be used by a contractor in the furtherance of his covered construction work, are activities subject to the Act.
Footnotes -
776.28
[26] *Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co.* v. *Hall,* 317 U.S. 8.
[27] *Culver* v. *Bell & Loffland,* 146 F. (2d) 20.
[28] *Devine* v. *Levy,* 39 F. Supp. 44.
[29] *Straughn* v. *Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.,* 72 F. Supp. 511.
[30] Coverage of preparation of plans and designs is discussed in § 776.19(b) (2).
#### In the Matter of Woody A., Appellant, v Maria V. F., Respondent.

Submitted June 26, 1995;

decided July 5, 1995

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law (CPLR 5601 [a]).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0199

LAURENCE STEWART,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

MONTANA STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants and Appellees.

FILED

JUN 0 9 2020

CI

egtiafnM2 r 3urt

Bowen Greenwood

Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal in this matter on the grounds that the

Appellant Laurence Stewart is deceased. No representative for Appellant's estate has

appeared in this matter and Appellees, via counsel, assert that they are unaware of the

appointment of such.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that if a representative for the Estate does not

appear by July 1, 2020, this matter shall be DISMISSED without further Order of this

Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

Dated this I day of June, 2020.

Chief Justice

06/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0199
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,530,157
<SECURITIES>                                    50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,385,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                   838,203
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,158,901      
<PP&E>                                      26,083,047     
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,524,466   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,376,637     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,163,793   
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                     2,106,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,943,570      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,376,637        
<SALES>                                     64,608,724         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,608,724         
<CGS>                                       36,313,317         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,313,317         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,100,628      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,137,728      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,220,119      
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,994,000     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,226,119     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,226,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
21.1
 
 LSB INDUSTRIES,
INC.
 SUBSIDIARY
LISTING
 Revised December 31,
2009
 
 
 LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Direct subsidiaries in bold italics)
 
 Prime
Financial Corporation
 Prime
Holdings Corporation (f/k/a Tower IV Corporation, f/k/a LSB Leasing
Corp.)
 Northwest
Capital Corporation
 ThermaClime,
Inc. (5% stock ownership)
 
 LSB
Holdings, Inc.
 LSB-Europa
Limited
 Summit
Machine Tool Inc. Corp.
 Cherokee
Nitrogen Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Cherokee Nitrogen Company)
 
 ClimateCraft
Technologies, Inc.
 
 INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
BUSINESS
 
 Summit
Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp.
 Summit
Machinery Company
 Pryor
      Chemical Company (f/k/a Pryor Plant Chemical Company, f/k/a LSB Financial
      Corp.)
 
 Hercules
Energy Mfg. Corporation
  
  CLIMATE CONTROL/CHEMICAL
BUSINESS
 
 ThermaClime,
Inc.(f/k/a
ClimaChem, Inc.) (95% stock ownership)
 Northwest
Financial Corporation
 LSB
Chemical Corp.
 El Dorado
Chemical Company
 Chemex I
Corp. (f/k/a Slurry Explosive Corporation)
 DSN
Corporation
 Chemex II
Corp. (f/k/a Universal Tech Corporation)
 El Dorado
Nitric Company (f/k/a El Dorado Nitrogen Company, f/k/a
 LSB
Nitrogen Corporation, f/k/a LSB Import Corp.)
 El Dorado
Acid, L.L.C. (General Partner of El Dorado
 Nitrogen,
L.P.)
 El Dorado
Nitrogen, L.P. (1% ownership)
 El Dorado
Acid II, L.L.C. (Limited Partner of El Dorado
 Nitrogen,
L.P.)
 El Dorado
Nitrogen, L.P. (99% ownership)
 XpediAir,
Inc. (f/k/a The Environmental Group, Inc.)
 International
Environmental Corporation
 Climate
Master, Inc.
 The
Climate Control Group, Inc. (f/k/a APR Corporation)
 ClimateCraft,
Inc. (f/k/a Summit Machine Tool Systems, Inc.)
 ThermaClime
Technologies, Inc. (f/k/a ACP International Limited,
 f/k/a ACP Manufacturing
Corp.)
 CEPOLK
Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a ThermalClime, Inc.; f/k/a LSB South America
 Corporation)
 ClimaCool
Corp. (f/k/a MultiClima Holdings, Inc., f/k/a LSB International
 Corp.)
 TRISON
Construction, Inc.
 Koax
Corp.
 Cherokee
Nitrogen Company
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 17 

Authorizing the use of Capitol grounds for Live Earth Concert. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Capitol grounds for Live Earth 

Concert. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR LIVE EARTH CONCERT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Live Earth organization and 

6 the Alliance for Climate Protection (in this resolution re7 ferred to as the ‘‘sponsors’’), may sponsor the Live Earth 

8 Concert (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) on 

9 the Capitol Grounds. 

10 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

11 July 7, 2007, or on such other date as the Speaker of 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 17 IS 

1 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

2 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

3 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

5 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

6 Board, the event shall be— 

7 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

8 public; and 

9 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

10 Congress. 

11 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsors 

12 shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabil13 ities incident to all activities associated with the event. 

14 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

15 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the 

16 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the sponsors may 

17 cause to be placed on the Capitol grounds such stage, seat18 ing, booths, sound amplification and video devices, and 

19 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

20 for the event, including equipment for the broadcast of 

21 the event over radio, television, and other media outlets. 

22 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of 

23 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make any 

24 additional arrangements as may be required to carry out 

25 the event. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•SCON 17 IS 

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act 

4 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con5 cerning sales, displays, advertisements, and solicitations 

6 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli7 cable to the Capitol Grounds in connection with the event. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employer Expenditures for Selected Supplementary Remuneration Practices for Production Workers in Manufacturing Industries, 1959

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employer Expenditures for Selected Supplementary Remuneration Practices for Production Workers in Manufacturing Industries, 1959 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1308*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										January 1962,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4716,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 779.312 “Retail or service establishment”, defined in section 13(a)(2).

The 1949 amendments to the Act defined the term “retail or service establishment” in section 13(a)(2). That definition was retained in section 13(a)(2) as amended in 1961 and 1966 and is as follows:

A “retail or service establishment” shall mean an establishment 75 per centum of whose annual dollar volume of sales of goods or services (or of both) is not for resale and is recognized as retail sales or services in the particular industry.

It is clear from the legislative history of the 1961 amendments to the Act that no different meaning was intended by the term “retail or service establishment” from that already established by the Act's definition, wherever used in the new provisions, whether relating to coverage or to exemption. (See S. Rept. 145, 87th Cong., first session p. 27; H.R. 75, 87th Cong., first session p. 9.) The legislative history of the 1949 amendments and existing judicial pronouncements regarding section 13(a)(2) of the Act, therefore, will offer guidance to the application of this definition.
(75 South. 629)

(1 Div. 231.)

#### RICHARDSON v. STATE.

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 1917.)

Criminal Daw &wkey;804(l) — Trial—Delivery ■of Charge in Writing or Reduction to Writing — Statute.

Where the trial court failed to deliver its charge in writing, as required by Code 1907, § 5364, as amended by Gen. Acts 1915, p. 816, providing that every general charge shall be in writing or taken down by the court reporter as it is delivered to the jury, and did not have it taken down by the court reporter as it was delivered, judgment of conviction must be reversed; the matter not resting within the discretion of the court.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Daw, Cent. Dig. §§ 1948, 1951.]

Appeal from Daw and Equity Court, Monroe County; W. G. McCorvey, Judge.

Thee Richardson was convicted of assault with a pistol, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

D. S. Biggs, of Monroeville, for appellant. W. D. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was convicted of an assault with a pistol, under the fourth count of a complaint which charged the defendant with five different offenses. No objection by demurrer or otherwise- was made to the complaint. We are free to state, however, that the complaint is an unusual one, containing, as it does, several separate and distinct offenses not of the same general nature nor belonging to the same family of crimes. However, no extended discussion of this nor of other questions raised by the record is deemed necessary, as the judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded because of the error committed by the court in overruling the ’defendant’s motion for a new trial, to which ruling of the court the defendant duly excepted. The motion should have been granted, upon the ground that the court failed to comply with the law (section 5364, Code 1907, as amended by General Acts 1915, p. 816) which provides that:

> “Every general charge shall be in writing or bo taken down by the court reporter as it is delivered to the jury.”

The failure of the court to deliver its charge in writing as required by said act, or to have-it taken down by the court reporter as it is delivered to the jury, is not a matter resting within the discretion of the court.

Reversed and remanded.
----

MEDIA PLUS (2001 to 2005)

Implementation of the programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works

Notice of call for proposals

Support for the networking of cinemas screening European films

(2004/C 271/05)

1.   Introduction

This call for proposals is based on Council Decision 2000/821/EC of 20 December 2000 on the implementation of a programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus – Development, distribution and promotion – 2001 to 2005), published in the Official Journal of the European Communities L 13 of 17 January 2001, p. 35.

The measures to be implemented under the Decision include support for the creation and consolidation of networks of European cinema operators running joint schemes to encourage the scheduling of European films, and support for cinemas screening a significant proportion of non-domestic European films for a minimum screening period.

2.   Purpose

This notice is intended for European cinema operators whose activities contribute to the attainment of the above objectives, especially cinema networks and associations. It explains how to obtain the necessary documents in order to submit proposals and apply for financial support from the Community.

The Commission department responsible for administering this call for proposals is the ‘Support for audiovisual content’ unit in DG EAC, the Directorate-General for Education and Culture.

European companies wishing to respond to this call for proposals and receive the document ‘Guidelines for the submission of proposals to obtain a financial contribution in the sector of distribution – Support for the networking of cinemas screening European films’, should send their request by post or fax to:

The Commission undertakes to send the above document within two working days of receiving the request.

The deadline for submitting proposals to the above address is 19 November 2004.

----
EXHIBIT  32

     STATEMENT  UNDER  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


The  undersigned,  the  Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer and the
Senior  Vice  President, Finance, of MacDermid, Incorporated ("the Corporation")
respectively,  each  hereby  certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:
The annual report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the annual period ended
December  31,  2004,  filed  on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  ("the Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
Information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of operations as of December 31, 2004, of
the  Corporation.



Date:  March  15,  2005                              /s/  Daniel  H.  Leever
       ----------------                              -----------------------

                                                       Daniel  H.  Leever
                                                         Chairman  and
                                                   Chief  Executive  Officer



Date:  March  15,  2005                        /s/  Gregory  M.  Bolingbroke
       ----------------                        -----------------------------

                                                  Gregory  M.  Bolingbroke
                                           Senior  Vice  President,  Finance

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to the Corporation and will be
retained  by  the  Corporation  and  furnished  to  the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
#### Mariann Grassel, as Administratrix of the Estate of George Grassel Deceased, Appellant, v Albany Medical Center Hospital et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 26, 1996;

decided April 30, 1996

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion for renewal or reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.