alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 520.401 Are there any industries, occupations, etc. that do not qualify for a certificate to employ messengers, learners, or apprentices at subminimum wages? ( a ) Certificates to employ messengers at subminimum wages are available to only those establishments engaged in the business of providing messenger service, i.e., the delivery of letters and messages. Requests for such certificates are uniformly denied to applicants whose principal business purpose is not the delivery of messages and letters.
( b ) All applications for special certificates authorizing the employment of learners at subminimum wage rates in the manufacture of products in the following industries shall be denied (definitions for all listed activities can be found in subpart C of this part): ( 1 ) In the apparel industry: ( i ) Rainwear
( ii ) Leather and sheep-lined clothing
( iii ) Women's apparel division of the apparel industry for the manufacture of women's misses', and juniors' dresses;
( iv ) Robes
( 2 ) Shoe manufacturing industry
( 3 ) Men's and boys' clothing industry.
( c ) No certificates will be granted authorizing the employment of learners at subminimum wage rates as homeworkers; in maintenance occupations such as guard, porter, or custodian; in office and clerical occupations in any industry; or in operations of a temporary or sporadic nature.
( d ) Authorization to employ apprentices at subminimum wages will only be granted if permitted by the BAT regulations (29 CFR Part 29).
EXHIBIT 23
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
KPMG  LLP  (Logo)
Certified  Public  Accountants
One Financial Plaza
Hartford,  CT  06103-4103
                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------
The  Board  of  Directors
MacDermid,  Incorporated:
We  consent  to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Number
033-61401,  333-64007  and  333-89185  on  Form S-8 and 333-68535 on Form S-3 of
MacDermid,  Incorporated  of  our  report  dated  May  18, 2001, relating to the
consolidated  balance  sheets  of MacDermid, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of
March  31,  2001  and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareholders' equity for each of
the  years  in  the  three-year  period  ended  March  31, 2001, which report is
incorporated  by  reference  in the March 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of
MacDermid,  Incorporated.
/s/  KPMG  LLP
May  18,  2001
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALJIT SINGH SANDHU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71656

Agency No. A076-457-451

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2012** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Daljit Singh Sandhu, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

MAR 13 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71656

denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th

Cir. 2008), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Sandhu’s motion to reopen

as untimely where the motion was filed six years after the BIA’s final decision, see

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Sandhu failed to demonstrate changed circumstances

in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 989-90 (9th Cir. 2010).

We reject Sandhu’s contention that the BIA did not adequately examine his

evidence. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2006)

(petitioner did not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record);

see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990 (the BIA “does not have to write an exegesis

on every contention”). Further, Sandhu’s contentions that the BIA failed to apply

the proper legal standard or properly address his claim for relief under the

Convention Against Torture are belied by the record. 

Finally, we lack jurisdiction over any challenge Sandhu makes to the BIA’s

2002 order affirming the immigration judge’s decision finding him not credible,

because Sandhu’s petition for review is untimely as to that order. See Toufighi,

538 F.3d at 995.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
##### 



(1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick
  (1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ Charles P. Cooley
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 132 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. RES. 132

Recognizing the Civil Air Patrol for 65 years of service to the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2007

  Mr. Stevens (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Crapo, Ms. 
Murkowski, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Snowe, Ms. Collins, Mr. Warner, 
   Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Webb, Mr. Cardin, and Ms. 
Mikulski) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 17, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

                             June 20, 2007

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the Civil Air Patrol for 65 years of service to the United 
                                States.

    Whereas the Civil Air Patrol was established on December 1, 1941, 
            in the Office of Civilian Defense;
    Whereas during World War II the volunteer units of the Civil Air 
            Patrol conducted search and rescue missions, provided air 
            transportation for military personnel and cargo, towed 
            targets for the training of Army Air Corps gunners, and 
            patrolled the coasts of the United States searching for 
            enemy submarines;
    Whereas by the end of World War II the Civil Air Patrol had flown 
            more than 500,000 hours, sunk 2 German U-boats, and saved 
            hundreds of crash victims;
    Whereas on July 1, 1946, the Civil Air Patrol was chartered by the 
            United States as a nonprofit, benevolent corporation;
    Whereas on May 26, 1948, the Civil Air Patrol was permanently 
            established as a volunteer auxiliary of the United States 
            Air Force;
    Whereas since 1942 the cadet programs of the Civil Air Patrol have 
            trained more than 750,000 youth, providing them with 
            leadership and life skills;
    Whereas since 1942 the Civil Air Patrol has flown more than 
            1,000,000 hours of search and rescue missions, saving 
            several thousand lives; and
    Whereas since 1951 the aerospace education programs of the Civil 
            Air Patrol have provided training and educational materials 
            to more than 300,000 teachers, who have educated more than 
            8,000,000 students about aerospace: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the Civil Air Patrol for 65 
years of service to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 107 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that no action should be taken to undermine the safety of the Armed Forces of the United States or impact 

their ability to complete their assigned or future missions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2007 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mr. LEVIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that no action should 

be taken to undermine the safety of the Armed Forces 

of the United States or impact their ability to complete 

their assigned or future missions. 

Whereas under the Constitution, the President and Congress 

have shared responsibilities for decisions on the use of 

the Armed Forces of the United States, including their 

mission, and for supporting the Armed Forces, especially 

during wartime; 

Whereas when the Armed Forces are deployed in harm’s way, 

the President, Congress, and the Nation should give them 

all the support they need in order to maintain their safety and accomplish their assigned or future missions, including the training, equipment, logistics, and funding 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 107 ATS 

necessary to ensure their safety and effectiveness, and 

such support is the responsibility of both the Executive 

Branch and the Legislative Branch of Government; and 

Whereas thousands of members of the Armed Forces who 

have fought bravely in Iraq and Afghanistan are not receiving the kind of medical care and other support this 

Nation owes them when they return home: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the President and Congress should not take 

3 any action that will endanger the Armed Forces of 

4 the United States, and will provide necessary funds 

5 for training, equipment, and other support for 

6 troops in the field, as such actions will ensure their 

7 safety and effectiveness in preparing for and car8 rying out their assigned missions; 

9 (2) the President, Congress, and the Nation 

10 have an obligation to ensure that those who have 

11 bravely served this country in time of war receive 

12 the medical care and other support they deserve; and 

13 (3) the President and Congress should— 

14 (A) continue to exercise their constitutional 

15 responsibilities to ensure that the Armed Forces 

16 have everything they need to perform their as17 signed or future missions; and 

18 (B) review, assess, and adjust United 

19 States policy and funding as needed to ensure 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 107 ATS 

1 our troops have the best chance for success in 

2 Iraq and elsewhere. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 779.359 May qualify as exempt 13(a)(2) establishments.

A liquefied-petroleum-gas or fuel oil dealer's establishment may qualify as an exempt retail or service establishment under section 13(a)(2) of the Act if it meets all the requirements of that exemption. (It should be noted, however, that employees of certain enterprises engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products may be partially exempt from the overtime provisions of the Act under section 7(b)(3). This overtime exemption is discussed in a separate bulletin, part 794 of this chapter. Liquefied-petroleum-gas means butane, propane and mixtures of butane and propane gases.
§ 38.17 Mobility aids and devices. ( a ) *Use of wheelchairs and manually-powered mobility aids.* A recipient must permit individuals with mobility disabilities to use wheelchairs and manually-powered mobility aids, such as walkers, crutches, canes, braces, or other similar devices designed for use by individuals with mobility disabilities, in any areas open to pedestrian use.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Use of other power-driven mobility devices.* A recipient must make reasonable modifications in its policies, practices, or procedures to permit the use of other power-driven mobility devices by individuals with mobility disabilities, unless the recipient can demonstrate that the class of other power-driven mobility devices cannot be operated in accordance with legitimate safety requirements that the recipient has adopted.
( 2 ) *Assessment factors.* In determining whether a particular other power-driven mobility device can be allowed in a specific facility as a reasonable modification under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a recipient must consider— ( i ) The type, size, weight, dimensions, and speed of the device;
( ii ) The facility's volume of pedestrian traffic (which may vary at different times of the day, week, month, or year);
( iii ) The facility's design and operational characteristics (*e.g.,* whether its WIOA Title I-financially assisted service, program, or activity is conducted indoors, its square footage, the density and placement of stationary devices, and the availability of storage for the device, if requested by the user);
( iv ) Whether legitimate safety requirements can be established to permit the safe operation of the other power-driven mobility device in the specific facility; and
( v ) Whether the use of the other power-driven mobility device creates a substantial risk of serious harm to the immediate environment or natural or cultural resources, or poses a conflict with Federal land management laws.
| Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------------|

| /s/  Steven L. Watson                 |   | /s/  Bobby D. O’Brien               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Steven L. WatsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 9, 2011                                                         |   | Bobby D. O’BrienVice President andChief Financial OfficerMarch 9, 2011                                              |
|                                                                                                                            |   |                                                                                                                      |
§ 575.3 Application for waiver. ( a ) An application for a waiver shall be filed with the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210. To permit adequate time for processing, it is recommended that such applications be filed 6 weeks prior to the period the waiver is to be in effect.
( b ) No particular form is prescribed. The application, which may be in letter form, shall be typewritten or clearly written and shall include the following information: ( 1 ) The general information as described in § 575.4 of this part: ( i ) Name and address of employer or group of employers;
( ii ) Telephone number;
( iii ) Location of farm(s);
( iv ) Crop or crops to be hand harvested;
( v ) Whether payment is customarily paid on a piece rate basis;
( vi ) Requested period of waiver;
( vii ) Statement that such employment shall be outside school hours;
( 2 ) The objective data as required in § 575.5 of this part to show that: ( i ) The crops have a short harvesting season;
( ii ) Without 10 and 11 year olds the industry would suffer severe economic disruption;
( iii ) Employment will not be deleterious to the health and well-being of 10 and 11 year olds;
( iv ) The level of pesticides will not adversely affect 10 and 11 year olds;
( v ) Individuals 12 years and over are not available for employment;
( vi ) Employer or group of employers has traditionally used minors under 12 years and this will not displace employees 16 years or older.
( c ) The application shall be signed and dated by the employer or group of employers requesting the waiver or by the authorized representative of such employer or group.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0120) [43 FR 26562, June 21, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 145, Jan. 5, 1982; 82 FR 2229, Jan. 9, 2017]
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 July 2004

in Joined Cases T-180/02 and T-113/03: Georgios Gouvras v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials - Posting - Secondment in the interest of the service - Change with retrospective effect of the place of employment and of the financial entitlements relating to it - Recovery of undue payment - Installation allowance and daily subsistence allowance - Transfer of part of emoluments from the place of posting)

(2004/C 239/37)

Language of the case: French

In Joined Cases T-180/02 and T-113/03: Georgios Gouvras, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing at Bereldange (Luxembourg), represented by J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and A. Coolen, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Curral and L. Lozano Palacios, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application:

in Case T-180/02, for annulment of the Commission's decision to fix, with retrospective effect from 1 November 2000 during the period of his secondment in the interest of the service, the applicant's place of employment as Athens, to withdraw his right to the expatriation allowance and his right to reimbursement of annual travel expenses and to apply the weighting coefficient for Greece to his pay, as well as the decision to recover the undue payment, and,

in Case T-113/03, for annulment of the Commission's decision refusing the applicant the installation allowance and the daily subsistence allowance for the period of his secondment to Athens in the interest of the service and the payment of the installation allowance on his resettlement in Luxembourg, as well as the decision limiting to 35 % the part of his pay to be transferred to his place of employment in Luxembourg during the period of his secondment — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 15 July 2004, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 191 of 10.8.2002.

----
```

[Federal Register: March 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 47)]
[Notices]               
[Page 11534]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11mr10-50]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

 
Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time and Place: Tuesday, March 9, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be 
held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20571.

Open Agenda Items:
    Item No. 1 Revision of Eximbank's Environmental Procedures and 
Guidelines consistent with the Bank's Carbon Policy.
    Item No. 2 Expanding Eligibility for Short Term Products.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Items No. 1 & 2 only.

For Further Information: For further information, contact: Office of 
the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (202) 565-
3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-4943 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)


                   LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                              Name under which 
                                          Jurisdiction        such subsidiary
Name of subsidiary                       of Incorporation     does business
------------------                       ----------------     ----------------

Lufkin Industries Canada, Ltd.           Province of Alberta,     Same
                                          Canada

P. T. Lufkin Indonesia                   Republic of Indonesia    Same

Lufkin Industries FSC, Inc.              Barbados                 Same

Lufkin Industries Europe, Bv.            The Netherlands          Same

Lufkin Japan, L. L. C.                   Japan                    Same

Lufkin France                            France                   Same
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly report of Wizzard Software Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, CEO, President, Treasurer and
director of the Registrant, and Gordon Berry, Controller of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and
belief:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 7/31/03                               /s/ Christopher Spencer
      ---------------                       -------------------------------
                                            Christopher J. Spencer
                                            CEO, President, Treasurer and
                                            director


Dated: 7/31/03                               /s/ Gordon Berry
      ---------------                       -------------------------------
                                            Gordon Berry
                                            Controller