alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 570.65 Occupations involving the operation of circular saws, band saws, guillotine shears, chain saws, reciprocating saws, wood chippers, and abrasive cutting discs (Order 14). ( a ) *Findings and declaration of fact.* The following occupations are particularly hazardous for the employment of minors between 16 and 18 years of age: ( 1 ) The occupations of operator of or helper on the following power-driven fixed or portable machines except machines equipped with full automatic feed and ejection: ( i ) Circular saws.
( ii ) Band saws.
( iii ) Guillotine shears.
( 2 ) The occupations of operator of or helper on the following power-driven fixed or portable machines: ( i ) Chain saws.
( ii ) Reciprocating saws.
( iii ) Wood chippers.
( iv ) Abrasive cutting discs.
( 3 ) The occupations of setting-up, adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning circular saws, band saws, guillotine shears, chain saws, reciprocating saws, wood chippers, and abrasive cutting discs.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section: *Abrasive cutting disc* shall mean a machine equipped with a disc embedded with abrasive materials used for cutting materials.
*Band saw* shall mean a machine equipped with an endless steel band having a continuous series of notches or teeth, running over wheels or pulleys, and used for sawing materials.
*Chain saw* shall mean a machine that has teeth linked together to form an endless chain used for cutting materials.
*Circular saw* shall mean a machine equipped with a thin steel disc having a continuous series of notches or teeth on the periphery, mounted on shafting, and used for sawing materials.
*Guillotine shear* shall mean a machine equipped with a moveable blade operated vertically and used to shear materials. The term shall not include other types of shearing machines, using a different form of shearing action, such as alligator shears or circular shears.
*Helper* shall mean a person who assists in the operation of a machine covered by this section by helping place materials into or remove them from the machine.
*Operator* shall mean a person who operates a machine covered by this section by performing such functions as starting or stopping the machine, placing materials into or removing them from the machine, or any other functions directly involved in operation of the machine.
*Reciprocating saw* shall mean a machine equipped with a moving blade that alternately changes direction on a linear cutting axis used for sawing materials.
*Wood chipper* shall mean a machine equipped with a feed mechanism, knives mounted on a rotating chipper disc or drum, and a power plant used to reduce to chips or shred such materials as tree branches, trunk segments, landscape waste, and other materials.
( c ) *Exemptions.* This section shall not apply to the employment of apprentices or student-learners under the conditions prescribed in § 570.50 (b) and (c).
[25 FR 9849, Oct. 14, 1960. Redesignated at 28 FR 1634, Feb. 21, 1963, and amended at 28 FR 3450, Apr. 9, 1963. Redesignated and amended at 36 FR 25156, Dec. 29, 1971; 75 FR 28457, May 20, 2010]
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment, dated
as of April 9, 2015 (the “Amendment”), to Employment Agreement dated as of August 13, 2010 and effective as of July
1, 2010, as amended to date (collectively, the “Agreement”), is by and between WidePoint Corporation (the “Company”)
and Steve L. Komar (“Executive”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to
such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound do hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Effective as of
April 1, 2015, Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the term of Executive’s employment under the Agreement
shall expire on December 31, 2015.


 


2. Effective as of
April 1, 2015, Section 4 of the Agreement is amended to provide that the Base Salary of Executive shall be Two Hundred Seventy
Thousand Dollars ($270,000.00) per annum during the term of the Agreement.


 


3. Except as expressly
provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement remain unaltered and are in full force
and effect and are expressly hereby ratified and confirmed. The Agreement and this Amendment shall be read and construed as one
agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


 


	WIDEPOINT CORPORATION	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ James T. McCubbin	 	/s/ Steve L. Komar
	Name:	James T. McCubbin	 	Steve L. Komar
	Title:	EVP and CFO	 	Individually
#### § 541.401 Computer manufacture and repair.

The exemption for employees in computer occupations does not include employees engaged in the manufacture or repair of computer hardware and related equipment. Employees whose work is highly dependent upon, or facilitated by, the use of computers and computer software programs (e.g., engineers, drafters and others skilled in computer-aided design software), but who are not primarily engaged in computer systems analysis and programming or other similarly skilled computer-related occupations identified in § 541.400(b), are also not exempt computer professionals.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wizzard Software Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Christopher J. Spencer, President, CEO and Treasurer and John Busshaus, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.   Date:8/11/08By:/s/ Christopher J. SpencerChristopher J. SpencerChief Executive Officer and President   Date:8/11/08By:/s/ John BusshausJohn BusshausChief Financial Officer
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 291 

Designating the week beginning September 9, 2007, as ‘‘National Historically 

Black Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BAYH, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. 

BOND, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. 

BURR, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

DEMINT, Mr. DODD, Mrs. DOLE, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. 

OBAMA, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. WARNER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning September 9, 2007, as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 

Week’’. 

Whereas there are 103 historically Black colleges and universities in the United States; 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide 

the quality education essential to full participation in a 

complex, highly technological society; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 291 ATS 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a 

rich heritage and have played a prominent role in the history of the United States; 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged students to attain their full 

potential through higher education; and 

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, that the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning September 9, 

3 2007, as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and 

4 Universities Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups to observe the week with appro7 priate ceremonies, activities, and programs to dem8 onstrate support for historically Black colleges and 

9 universities in the United States. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 501.47 Certification.

Upon receipt of a complaint seeking review of a decision issued pursuant to this part filed in a District Court of the United States, after the administrative remedies have been exhausted, the Chief ALJ or, where the case has been the subject of administrative review, the ARB shall promptly index, certify, and file with the appropriate District Court of the United States, a full, true, and correct copy of the entire record, including the transcript of proceedings.
#### Morrison *vs*Glass.

*Oct.*21.

Error to the Christian Circuit.

*Assignor and assignee. Diligence.- Lien.*

The case stated.

Where a note is assigned which appears Jto have been given for land, and it is proved that the land has not been conveyed, tho’ diligence by suit against the obligor has been used, the assign nor is not responsible until the lien upon the land has been exhausted.

Chief Justice Ewing

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by Glass against Morrison, as assignee of a note, on the return of *nulla bona*on an execution against Owen, the obligor.

We think that sufficient diligence was used in the prosecution of the suit against Owen, to sustain the plaintiff’s action... The diligence is such as a prudent man would have used in the prosecution of his own claim.

But it appears from the face of the assigned note, that it was given in part consideration of a tract of land sold by Morrison to Owen, and it was proven that the title had not been conveyed, which was known to Glass before the institution of this suit. Morrison, therefore, held a lien upon the land to secure the consideration, a rateable share of which passed by the assignment of the note to Glass. This lien Glass was bound to pursue to exhaustion before he had a right to pursue Morrison at law on his personal liability as assignor. The whip was *241placed in his hands by the assignment of the note, and *he was*bound to use it, not only in' pursuing the obligor at law, but also in pursuing the equity which the assignment carried with it to his use, before he had a right to turn on the assignor.

*Gales tfi Lindsey*for appellant.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and cause remanded, that a judgment may be rendered against the plaintiff as in case of a non-suit, as asked by the defendant’s counsel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at September 30, 1999 and the Statement of
Income for the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          25,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,480
<PP&E>                                          24,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,192)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       245,149
<OTHER-SE>                                   (213,199)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,950
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (166,416)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (166,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (166,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (166,416)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3
- 0147 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEXANDER GARRETT LAFORGE, III,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 20 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2023

09/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0147
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 250 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 250

  Expressing the Sense of the Senate condemning the military junta in 
    Burma for its continued detention of Aung San Suu Kyi and other 
                          political prisoners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2007

   Mr. McConnell (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Hutchison, Mrs. 
     Clinton, Mr. McCain, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Lugar, Mrs. Lincoln, Ms. 
Murkowski, and Mrs. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the Sense of the Senate condemning the military junta in 
    Burma for its continued detention of Aung San Suu Kyi and other 
                          political prisoners.

Whereas Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi has dedicated her life to 
        the peaceful, non-violent movement for democracy and reconciliation in 
        the Union of Burma;
Whereas Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy won a majority of 
        parliamentary seats in Burma's last election held in 1990;
Whereas the State Peace and Development Council of Burma refuses to cede power 
        and permit representative government and has detained Aung San Suu Kyi 
        under house arrest for 11 of the last 17 years;
Whereas the ruling military junta has committed numerous, well-documented 
        atrocities against the people of Burma;
Whereas Aung San Suu Kyi continues to promote peaceful dialogue and 
        reconciliation despite mistreatment from the State Peace and Development 
        Council;
Whereas the United States recognizes and supports the dedication and commitment 
        to freedom demonstrated by Aung San Suu Kyi: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi for 
        her courage and devotion to the people of the Union of Burma 
        and their struggle for democracy; and
            (2) calls for the immediate release of Aung San Suu Kyi and 
        other political prisoners by the State Peace and Development 
        Council.
                                 <all>
```
(75 South. 630)

(2 Div. 157.)

#### PITTS, Probate Judge, v. BERRY.

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 1917.)

Courts <&wkey;42(3) — Act Creating Inferior Court — Constitutionality.

Loc.. Acts 1915, p. 436, creating the inferior court for Dallas county, is unconstitutional.

[Ed. Note. — For otlior cases, see Courts, Gent Dig. §§ 166, 167, 181-183.]

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; B. M. Miller, Judge.

Suit for mandamus between J. Heflin Berry and P. H. Pitts, as Probate Judge, etc. From the judgment, an appeal is taken.

Judgment reversed and judgment rendered 'denying the writ and dismissing the petition.

Arthur M. Pitts, of Selma, for appellant. Pettus, Fuller & Laiislcy, of Selma, for appellee.

BROWN, P. J.

The only question involved in this case — the constitutionality of the act creating the inferior court for Dallas county (Local’ Acts 1915, p. 436) — was fully considered in State v. Roden, 73 South. 657,1 and was determined in favor of the appellant’s contention here, that the act is unconstitutional. On the authority of that case, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a judgment here rendered denying the writ of mandamus and dismissing the petition at the cost of the petitioner.

Reversed and rendered.

1

15 Ala. App. 385.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1926

#### Editorial Notes:

1. At 44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979, and corrected at 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, OSHA reprinted without change the entire text of 29 CFR part 1926 together with certain General Industry Occupational Safety and Health Standards contained in 29 CFR part 1910, which have been identified as also applicable to construction work. This republication developed a single set of OSHA regulations for both labor and management forces within the construction industry.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1926 appear at 84 FR 21597, May 14, 2019.

#### §§ 1926.1054-1926.1059 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register: November 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 222)]
[Notices]               
[Page 70725-70726]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18no10-65]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Spectrum Policy Seminar for the Utility Sector

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 5, 2010, after an extensive public notice and 
comment process, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a report 
entitled, ``Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies. '' 
The complete text of the report, and of a second report addressing data 
access and privacy issues arising from the deployment of smart grid 
technologies, can be found at: http://www.gc.energy.gov/1592.htm.
    One recommendation in the report was to provide more information to 
the utility sector on spectrum policy issues in light of the role 
wireless communications will surely play in the deployment of smart 
grid technologies. At this spectrum policy seminar, senior officials 
from the Federal Communications Commission and the Commerce 
Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration 
will provide an overview designed for the utility sector of the current 
spectrum management process. They will also address some of the Federal 
programs currently available to ensure priority restoration and 
priority calling for utilities during times of emergency. All members 
of the public are invited to attend.

DATES: The Department will hold a public meeting on December 8, 2010, 
from 2 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. in Washington, DC.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of 
Energy, Forrestal Building, Room GH-019, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-0121. Please pre-register to the extent possible 
by contacting Katharine Dickerson at 202-586-5281 or 
Katharine.Dickerson@hq.doe.gov. Additionally, please note that foreign 
nationals participating in the public meeting are subject to advance 
security screening procedures. If a foreign national wishes to 
participate in the public meeting, please inform DOE of this fact as 
soon as possible by contacting Katharine Dickerson so that the 
necessary procedures can be completed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauren M. Van Wazer, Senior Advisor, 
Technology Law (202) 586-3421; broadband@hq.doe.gov.
    For Media Inquires you may contact Jen Stutsman at 202-586-4940.

[[Page 70726]]

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 12, 2010.
Scott Blake Harris,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-29089 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
##### 



2005 Deferred Compensation Plan For Directors
 Purpose
 Administration
 Right to Defer Compensation
     1




---



##### 



Deferral of Cash Compensation
     Deferral of Stock Compensation.
   (i)
    
    the product of (x) the dividend per Share which is payable
with respect to such dividend payment date, multiplied by (y) the number of
whole and fractional Units credited to the separate Stock Deferral Account of
a Participant as of such payment date;
 divided by
 2




---



##### 



(ii)
    
    The closing price of a Share on the dividend payment date (or
if Shares were not traded on that date, on the next preceding day on which
Shares were so traded), as reported on the NYSE-composite tape.
   Payment of Deferred Compensation
  
 3




---



##### 



Scheduled Withdrawal Accounts
 4




---



##### 



Unforeseen Emergency
 Non-assignability
 Interest of Participant
 5




---



##### 



Amendment
 Plan Implementation
 Section 409A Transition Elections
 6
|Exhibit 99.1


Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report of First Coastal Bancshares (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don M.
Griffith, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 1) |  | The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 2) |  | The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |  | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/
      Don M. Griffith
      
      Don M. Griffith
      Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|18
|--