alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robin Reddi, Appellant.

[697 NYS2d 534]

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered December 18, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 12268/95, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Hanophy, J.), rendered December 19, 1996, convicting him of a violation of probation under Indictment No. 10373/91, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, during the trial under Indictment No. 12268/95, the court properly Ordered the courtroom sealed during the testimony of an undercover police officer. The officer testified that he would be returning to the area of the defendant’s arrest as an undercover officer, and that he had received several threats from the family and friends of someone he had shot and who resided in close proximity of the courthouse. Based upon this testimony, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in closing the courtroom during the officer’s testimony to all persons but the defendant’s family, attorneys, and police officers *(see, People v Martinez, 82*NY2d 436, 443; *People v Pearson,*82 NY2d 436, 443; *People v Monroig,*223 AD2d 730, 731; *People v*
      *407
      *Arroyo,*208 AD2d 940; *People v Crowder,*207 AD2d 559, 560; *People v Reece,*204 AD2d 495, 496).

The defendant’s contentions of prosecutorial misconduct during the summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the challenged comments do not require reversal. A prosecutor has broad latitude during summation, particularly when responding to the defense counsel’s summation *(see, People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396), and the challenged remarks here can be characterized as fair response to the defense counsel’s summation *(see, People v Rosario,*195 AD2d 577; *People v Rivera,*158 AD2d 723).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Altman, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.
#### § 530.414 Equal Access to Justice Act.

Proceedings under this part are not subject to the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act. In any hearing conducted pursuant to these regulations, Administrative Law Judges shall have no power or authority to award attorney fees or other litigation expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   EXHIBIT 21
                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MACDERMID, INCORPORATED
MacDermid's  principal,  wholly-owned,  subsidiaries  are  as  follows:


<S>                                        <C>
                                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Dynacircuits LLC. . . . . . . . . . . . .  Illinois
Ferwell SRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Italy
Jager Juene, S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . .  France
MacDermid, plc. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  United Kingdom
MacDermid Asia, Ltd . . . . . . . . . . .  Hong Kong
MacDermid Benelux BV. . . . . . . . . . .  Holland
MacDermid Canning . . . . . . . . . . . .  Texas
MacDermid Canning, ltd. . . . . . . . . .  United Kingdom
MacDermid Chemicals, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Canada
MacDermid Colorspan, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Delaware
MacDermid Equipment, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Connecticut
MacDermid Equipment Asia Ltd. . . . . . .  Taiwan
MacDermid Equipment GmbH. . . . . . . . .  Germany
MacDermid Espanola, S.A.. . . . . . . . .  Spain
MacDermid France, S.A.. . . . . . . . . .  France
MacDermid GmbH. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Germany
MacDermid GmbH Canning. . . . . . . . . .  Germany
MacDermid Printing Solutions, llc.. . . .  Delaware
MacDermid Graphic Arts, SAS.. . . . . . .  France
MacDermid Hong Kong, Ltd. . . . . . . . .  Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Asia . . . .  Hong Kong
MacDermid Imaging Technology Europe BV. .  Holland
MacDermid Italiana SRL. . . . . . . . . .  Italy
MacDermid New Zealand, Ltd. . . . . . . .  New Zealand
MacDermid Scandinavia . . . . . . . . . .  Sweden
MacDermid S.A. (Pty.) Ltd.. . . . . . . .  South Africa
MacDermid Singapore, Pte. Ltd.. . . . . .  Singapore
MacDermid Suisse, S.A.. . . . . . . . . .  Switzerland
MacDermid Taiwan, Ltd.. . . . . . . . . .  Taiwan
Napp Systems Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . .  California
Nippon MacDermid Co., Ltd . . . . . . . .  Japan
PTI Productos Technicos Para Impessao Ltd  Brazil
<FN>

In  addition,  the Corporation has several non-operating subsidiaries, which, in
the  aggregate,  are  not  significant.
</TABLE>
#### § 778.210 Percentage of total earnings as bonus.

In some instances the contract or plan for the payment of a bonus may also provide for the simultaneous payment of overtime compensation due on the bonus. For example, a contract made prior to the performance of services may provide for the payment of additional compensation in the way of a bonus at the rate of 10 percent of the employee's straight-time earnings, and 10 percent of his overtime earnings. In such instances, of course, payments according to the contract will satisfy in full the overtime provisions of the Act and no recomputation will be required. This is not true, however, where this form of payment is used as a device to evade the overtime requirements of the Act rather than to provide actual overtime compensation, as described in §§ 778.502 and 778.503.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>         5
  <LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1999 and the consolidated
statement of earnings for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 included in
Exhibit 13 to the 1999 Form 10-K Annual Report of MacDermid, Incorporated and
is qualified in its entirety to such statements.

<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                          15486
<SECURITIES>                    968
<RECEIVABLES>                   115030
<ALLOWANCES>                    6411
<INVENTORY>                     56049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                189374
<PP&E>                          109205
<DEPRECIATION>                  49966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  506279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           126126
<BONDS>                         231009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        39413
<OTHER-SE>                      102626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    506279
<SALES>                         382648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                382648
<CGS>                           192961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   328585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                135624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                1383
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              13271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 54063
<INCOME-TAX>                    17780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             36283
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    36283
<EPS-BASIC>                   1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.43

</TABLE>
§ 70.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) The terms agency, person, party, rule, order, and adjudication have the meaning attributed to these terms by the definitions in 5 U.S.C. 551.
( b ) Confidential commercial information means commercial or financial information received or obtained by the Department from a submitter, directly or indirectly, that arguably may be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA.
( c ) The Department means the Department of Labor.
( d ) FOIA Component means an official component of the Department that has authority to disclose or withhold records under the FOIA and to which requests to inspect or copy records in its custody should be addressed. Department of Labor components are listed in Appendix A to this part.
( e ) Record means any information that would be an agency record subject to the requirements of this part when maintained by an agency in any format, including an electronic format, and any information described under this part that is maintained for an agency by an entity under Government contract, for the purposes of records management.
( f ) Request means any written request for records made pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) and which meets the requirements of this part.
( g ) Requester means any person who makes a request.
( h ) Search means to look for, manually or by automated means, Department records for the purpose of locating them in response to a pending request.
( i ) The Secretary means the Secretary of Labor.
( j ) Submitter means any person or entity from whom the Department receives or obtains confidential commercial or financial information, directly or indirectly. The term submitter includes, but is not limited to, corporations, labor organizations, non-profit organizations, and local, state, and tribal and foreign governments.
( k ) Unusual circumstances means, to the extent reasonably necessary for the proper processing of a FOIA request: ( 1 ) The need to search for and collect the requested records from physically separate facilities;
( 2 ) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are demanded in a single request; or
( 3 ) The need for consultation, which will be conducted with all practicable speed, with another agency or among two or more components of the Department having a substantial interest in the determination of the request.
Editorial Note on Part 6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 6 appear at 61 FR 19984, May 3, 1996.

§ 6.3 Service; copies of documents and pleadings. ( a ) *Manner of service.* Service upon any party shall be made by the party filing the pleading or document by delivering a copy or mailing a copy to the last known address. When a party is represented by an attorney, the service should be upon the attorney.
( b ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the person serving the pleading or other document by personal delivery or by mailing, setting forth the manner of said service shall be proof of the service. Where service is made by mail, service shall be complete upon mailing. However, documents are not deemed filed until received by the Chief Clerk at the Office of Administrative Law Judges and where documents are filed by mail 5 days shall be added to the prescribed period.
( c ) *Service upon Department, number of copies of pleading or other documents.* An original and three copies of all pleadings and other documents shall be filed with the Department of Labor: The original and one copy with the Administrative Law Judge before whom the case is pending, one copy with the attorney representing the Department during the hearing, and one copy with the Associate Solicitor.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 103 (Friday, May 26, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 34144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13316]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List commodities to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis R. Bartalot (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    On February 4 and March 31, 2000, the Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notices (65 F.R. 
5492 and 17255) of proposed additions to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the commodities 
and impact of the additions on the current or most recent contractors, 
the Committee has determined that the commodities listed below are 
suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-
48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the commodities to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the commodities.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the commodities to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the commodities proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following commodities are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:
Blanket Set, Bed
6545-00-911-1300
Thumbtacks, Maptacks and Pushpins
7510-00-272-6886 (Thumbtacks)
7510-00-272-6887 (Thumbtacks)
7510-00-272-3099 (Maptacks)
7510-00-285-5844 (Maptacks)
7510-00-940-0935 (Pushpins)

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.

Leon A. Wilson, Jr.,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 00-13316 Filed 5-25-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
An official website of the United States government          

Here’s how you know

**Official websites use .gov**A              **.gov** website belongs to an official government              organization in the United States.            

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**A              **lock** (              LockLocked padlock icon) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.            

Skip to contentSkip to navigation

- Home
- About +   - Spread the Word
- Focus Areas +   - Accessible, Affordable Housing
  - Fair Housing
  - Homelessness
  - Supportive Services
  - Transitions Out of Institutions
  - Traumatic Brain Injury
  - Tribal Housing
- Tools +   - Data & Reports
  - Directories
  - Funding & Programs
  - Models
  - Terms & Acronyms
  - Tools & Toolkits
  - Training & Education
- What's New

I need housing or services help

# Identifying and Building Partnerships with Your Local Housing Sector Video Series

Professionals in the aging, disability, and health networks can use any or all of these three interactive virtual workshops to learn the basics about affordable housing and to identify and reach out to potential partners in this sector.

Links mentioned in this workshop series

## Workshop 1: Introductory Housing Concepts 

Download Workshop 1 Slides

## Workshop 2: Public Housing and Private HUD Assisted Housing

Download Workshop 2 Slides

## Workshop 3: Engaging Local Housing Officials

Download Workshop 3 Slides

*Last modified on 08/23/2023*

**      Back to Top    

## 

The Housing and Services Resource Center is part of an interagency initiative to streamline and expand access to affordable, accessible housing and the critical services that make community living possible.

 

## Site Support

-  Accessibility 
-  Disclaimers 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Sitemap 
-  Viewers & Players 

## Helpful Sites

-  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
-  No Fear Act 
-  Vulnerability Disclosure Policy 

## Sign up for email

Subscribe * *

**  Share on Other Platforms

An official website of the Administration for Community Living, an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00228-CR

DAVID DURAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 211th District 

Court

of Denton County (F-2003-0427-C)

December 15, 2022

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND BALANCE SHEETS OF LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC. FOR THE 9
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,400
<INVENTORY>                                     13,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,300
<PP&E>                                         478,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,300
<BONDS>                                        258,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
From: Charles Byrum/R6/USEPA/US@EPA

To: Russ Patterson <russ.patterson@wipp.ws>, Steve Kouba <steve.kouba@wipp.ws>

Cc: Jonathan Walsh/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Peake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Thurber <wcthurber@verizon.net>

Date: 03/10/2010 08:25 AM

Subject: Fluid Injection Question, Increase rate and total volume

Russ, Steve,

While working on CARD 15 we saw that the average fluid injection rate has increased to 1,480 

BWPD from 1,250 BWPD and the total injection volume has increase by 75%. But we could 

not find in the 2009 CRA where this was considered, analyzed, and compared to the CCA 

modeling to determine its impact or importance. Did we miss it, please help us out or we need 

an analysis to be done?

Thanks,

Chuck Byrum
#### § 4010.13 Confidentiality of information submitted.

In accordance with § 4901.21(a) of this chapter and ERISA section 4010(c), any information or documentary material that is not publicly available and is submitted to PBGC pursuant to this part will not be made public, except as may be relevant to any administrative or judicial action or proceeding or for disclosures to either body of Congress or to any duly authorized committee or subcommittee of the Congress.

[61 FR 34022, July 1, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 11035, Mar. 16, 2009; 88 FR 76664, Nov. 7, 2023]
§ 505.6 Safety and health standards. ( a ) *Standards.* Section 5(i)(2) and section 7(g)(2) of the Act provide that “no part of any project or production which is financed in whole or in part under this section will be performed or engaged in under working conditions which are unsanitary or hazardous or dangerous to the health and safety of the employees engaged in such project or production. Compliance with the safety and sanitary laws in the State in which the performance or part thereof is to take place shall be prima facie evidence of compliance. * * *” The applicable safety and health standards shall be those set forth in 29 CFR parts 1910 and 1926, including matters incorporated by reference therein. Evidence of compliance with State laws relating to health and sanitation will be considered prime facie evidence of compliance with the safety and health requirements of the Act, and it shall be sufficient unless rebutted or overcome by a preponderance of evidence of a failure to comply with any applicable safety and health standards set forth in 29 CFR parts 1910 and 1926, including matters incorporated by reference therein.
( b ) *Variances.* ( 1 ) Variances from standards applied under paragraph (a) of this section may be granted under the same circumstances in which variances may be granted under section 6(b)(6)(A) or 6(d) of the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655). The procedures for the granting of variances and for related relief are those published in part 1905 of this title.
( 2 ) Any requests for variances shall also be considered requests for variances under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and any variance from a standard applied under paragraph (a) of this section and in part 1910 of this title shall be deemed a variance from the standards under both the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965 and the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.