alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 20
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 57 FR 31451, July 16, 1992.

§ 20.211 Financial hardship. ( a ) A debtor whose wages are subject to a wage withholding order under this subpart, may, at any time, request a review by the Department of the amount garnished, based on materially changed circumstances such as disability, divorce, or catastrophic illness which result in financial hardship.
( b ) A debtor requesting a review under paragraph (a) of this section shall submit the basis for claiming that the current amount of garnishment results in a financial hardship to the debtor, along with supporting documentation. The Department shall consider any information submitted in accordance with procedures and standards established by the agency.
( c ) If a financial hardship is found, the Department shall downwardly and temporarily adjust the amount garnished to reflect the debtor's financial condition. The Department will notify the employer of any adjustments to the amounts to be withheld.
Exhibit 32.1


                            Section 906 Certification
                            -------------------------

            The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-K of the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

            The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the MLM Index Fund.


May 16, 2005


/s/ Timothy J. Rudderow
-----------------------------
Timothy J. Rudderow
President
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund




<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27743-27744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11575]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

RTCA Program Management Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Program Management Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the RTCA Program Management Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 26, 2011 from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Colson Board Room, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Program Management Committee meeting. The 
agenda will include:

 Opening Plenary (Welcome And Introductions).
 Review/Approve Summary of March 17, 2011 PMC meeting, RTCA 
Paper No. 085-11/PMC-889.
 Publication Consideration/Approval.
 Final Draft, Report--Assessment of the LightSquared Ancillary 
Terrestrial Component Radio Frequency Interference Impact on GNSS L1 
Band

[[Page 27744]]

Airborne Receiver Operations, prepared by SC-159.
 Other Business.
 Document Production and PMC Meeting Schedule.
 Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-11575 Filed 5-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 580.6 Exception to determination of penalty and request for hearing. ( a ) Any person desiring to take exception to the determination of penalty, or to seek judicial review, shall request an administrative hearing pursuant to this part. The exception shall be in writing to the official who issued the determination at the Wage and Hour Division address appearing on the determination notice, and must be received no later than 15 days after the date of receipt of the notice referred to in § 580.3. No additional time shall be added where service of the determination of penalties or of the exception thereto is made by mail. If such a request for an administrative hearing is timely filed, the Administrator's determination shall be inoperative unless and until the case is dismissed or the Administrative Law Judge issues a decision affirming the determination.
( b ) No particular form is prescribed for any exception to determination of penalty and request for hearing permitted by this part. However, any such request shall: ( 1 ) Be dated;
( 2 ) Be typewritten or legibly written;
( 3 ) Specify the issue(s) stated in the notice of determination giving rise to such request;
( 4 ) State the specific reason(s) why the person requesting the hearing believes such determination is in error;
( 5 ) Be signed by the person making the request or by an authorized representative of such person; and
( 6 ) Include the address at which such person or authorized representative desires to receive further communications relating thereto.
[56 FR 24991, May 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 17222, Apr. 5, 1995; 69 FR 75405, Dec. 16, 2004]
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Lake Recreation, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, Wayne Bassham, President and director and Todd
Albiston, Secretary/Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 11/5/2004                         /s/Wayne Bassham
      ----------                         ---------------------------
                                         Wayne Bassham
                                         President and director


Dated: 11/5/2004                         /s/Todd Albiston
      ----------                         ---------------------------
                                         Todd Albiston
                                         Secretary/Treasurer and director
EXHIBIT 32
               WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
        AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)
              OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of MacDermid, Incorporated (the "Corporation"), respectively, each hereby
certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

Date:  September 28, 2004                 /s/ Daniel H. Leever
       --------------                     --------------------
       for the amended form 10-K/A       Name: Daniel H. Leever
       certifying the report as of     Title: Chairman, President and
       March 15, 2004, date of             Chief Executive Officer
       original filing

Date:  September 28, 2004              / s / Gregory M. Bolingbroke
       --------------                   ----------------------------
       for the amended Form 10-K/A       Name: Gregory M. Bolingbroke
       certifying the report as of    Title: Senior Vice President, Finance
       March 15, 2004, date of
       original filing



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and
will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(77 South. 1002)

#### ALLEN v. STATE.

(6 Div. 425.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 1917.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; T. L. Sowell, Judge.

W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
(78 South. 717)

#### RICHARDSON v. STATE.

(1 Div. 284.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 16, 1918.)

Criminal Law <&wkey;1167(5) — Harmless Error —Rulings on Demurrer.

Errors in rulings on demurrers to a complaint are harmless, where counts demurred to are afterwards eliminated on a plea of autrefois acquit.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County; Ben D.'Turner, Judge.

Thee Richardson was convicted of assault with a pistpl, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

See, also, ante, p. 81, 75 South. 629.

L. S. Biggs, of Monroeville, for appellant. P. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, P. J.

After defendant’s demurrers to the complaint were overruled, he filed a plea of autrefois acquit as to the first, second, third, and fifth counts, and this plea was confessed hy the state, thus eliminating all counts of the complaint except the fourth, so if error intervened in the rulings on the demurrers, it was error without injury. As to count 4, the defendant pleadéd not guilty, was tried and convicted, and appeals on the record without a bill of exceptions.

Aside from the rulings above noted, the record appears to be in all things regular and free from error.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATE
      OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**OF
      DIOMED HOLDINGS, INC. (REGISTRANT)**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      James
      A. Wylie, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best
      of
      my knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:




(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, which this
      statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Registrant.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter
      63
      title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.




Date:
              August 14, 2007
            
            /s/
              JAMES A. WYLIE, JR.James A. Wylie, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 23
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
KPMG  LLP  (Logo)
Certified  Public  Accountants
One  Financial  Plaza
Hartford,  CT  06103-4103
                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------
The  Board  of  Directors
MacDermid,  Incorporated:
We  consent  to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Number
033-61401,  333-64007,  333-89185, 950123-01-505083 and 950123-01-505084 on Form
S-8  and  333-68535 and 333-102177 on Form S-3 of MacDermid, Incorporated of our
report  dated  February  4, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
MacDermid,  Incorporated  and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the  related  consolidated  statements  of  earnings, comprehensive income, cash
flows  and changes in shareholders' equity for the year ended December 31, 2002,
the nine months ended December 31, 2001 and the year ended March 31, 2001, which
report  is  incorporated  by reference in the December 31, 2002 annual report on
Form  10-K/A  of  MacDermid,  Incorporated.
/s/  KPMG  LLP
March  27,  2003
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 23 

Designating the week of February 5 through February 9, 2007, as ‘‘National 

School Counseling Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2007 

Mrs. MURRAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of February 5 through February 9, 

2007, as ‘‘National School Counseling Week’’. 

Whereas the American School Counselor Association has declared the week of February 5 through February 9, 

2007, as ‘‘National School Counseling Week’’; 

Whereas the Senate has recognized the importance of school 

counseling through the inclusion of elementary and secondary school counseling programs in the reauthorization 

of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; 

Whereas school counselors have long advocated that the education system of the United States must leave no child 

behind and must provide opportunities for every student; 

Whereas personal and social growth results in increased academic achievement; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 23 IS 

Whereas school counselors help develop well-rounded students 

by guiding them through their academic, personal, social, 

and career development; 

Whereas school counselors have been instrumental in helping 

students, teachers, and parents deal with the trauma that 

was inflicted upon them by hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and 

Wilma; 

Whereas students face myriad challenges every day, including 

peer pressure, depression, and school violence; 

Whereas school counselors are among the few professionals in 

a school building that are trained in both education and 

mental health; 

Whereas the roles and responsibilities of school counselors are 

often misunderstood, and the school counselor position is 

often among the first to be eliminated in order to meet 

budgetary constraints; 

Whereas the national average ratio of students to school 

counselors of 478-to-1 is more than double the 250-to-1 

ratio recommended by the American School Counselor 

Association, the American Counseling Association, the 

American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and other organizations; and 

Whereas the celebration of National School Counseling Week 

would increase awareness of the important and necessary 

role school counselors play in the lives of students in the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of February 5 through 

3 February 9, 2007, as ‘‘National School Counseling 

4 Week’’; and 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 23 IS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities that promote awareness of the role school 

4 counselors perform in the school and the community 

5 at large in preparing students for fulfilling lives as 

6 contributing members of society. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Joseph DeRosa, Appellant, v Michael A. Arcuri, as District Attorney of the County of Oneida, et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 11, 1996

decided April 30, 1996

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine *842the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not a nonfinal order of the type within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
§ 779.204 Common types of “enterprise.” ( a ) *The single establishment business.* In the simplest type of organization—the entire business ordinarily is one enterprise. The entire business activity of the single owner-employer may be performed in one establishment, as in the typical independently owned and controlled retail store. In that case the establishment and the enterprise are one and the same. All of the activities of the store are “related” and are performed for a single business purpose and there is both unified operation and common control. The entire business is the unit for applying the statutory tests. If the coverage tests are met, all of the employees employed by the establishment are employed in the enterprise and will be entitled to the benefits of the Act unless otherwise exempt.
( b ) *The multiunit business.* In many cases, as in the typical chain of retail stores, one company conducts its single business in a number of establishments. All of the activities ordinarily are related and performed for one business purpose, the single company which owns the chain also controls the entire business, and the entire business is a single enterprise. The dollar volume of the entire business from all of its establishments is added together to determine whether the requisite dollar volume tests are met. If the coverage tests are met, all of the employees employed in the business will be entitled to the benefits of the Act unless otherwise exempt.
( c ) *Complex business organizations.* In complex retail and service organizations, questions may arise as to whether certain activities are a part of a particular enterprise. In some cases one employer may operate several separate enterprises; in others, several employers may conduct their business activities in such a manner that they are part of a single enterprise. The answer, in each case, as to whether or not the “enterprise” includes certain activities will depend upon whether the particular activities are “related” to the business purpose of such enterprise and whether they are performed with its other activities through “unified operation” or “common control,” or whether, on the other hand, they are performed for a separate and distinct business purpose. As the Senate Report states,
related activities conducted by separate business entities will be considered a part of the same enterprise where they are joined either through unified operation or common control into a unified business system or economic unit to serve a common business purpose. (S. Rept. 145, 87th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 41; see also H. Rept. 1366, 89th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 9.) §§ 779.205 through 779.211 discuss the terms of the definition and may aid in making these determinations.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation: 2009 ISMI GuidelinesDate Staff Contact Information Name of Organization Summary of Discussion Writt

ComProvDid tsubmDock

January 27, 2010 Kirsten Cappel 

(202) 343-9556 cappel.kirsten@epa.gov

• Outside participants identified below. • EPA Climate Change Division and EPA contractors: Kirsten Cappel, EPA; Scott Bartos, EPA; Deb Harris, ICF 

International.

Participants discussed overall changes/differences between the 2006 ISMI Guidelines and the 2009 ISMI Guidelines. The revisions made to the POU abatement appendix were also discussed. 

No. suppdevepublcomthrouindusurv

Outside Participants: Mike Sherer, Sherer Consulting Services, Inc., Msherereng@aol.com Laurie Beu, Consultant to ISMI, laurie.beu@ismi.sematech.org Steve Trammell, ISMI, steve.trammell@ismi.sematech.org

1
Order entered April 12, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00801-CV 

IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

LATINA FOSTER, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-00179-E 

ORDER 

Before Justices Osborne, Reichek, and Smith 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED. 

/s/ CRAIG SMITH 

 JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 31.4
  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:
  1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Madison Gas and Electric Company; 2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; 4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
    designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
    which this report is being prepared; and
  b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
    by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
    during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
    affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions): a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial; and
  b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
    the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Terry A. Hanson
  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
  Date: March 14, 2005