Change Number Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Date

M-36-16-02 Change Control Form 8/18/2016

Originator Phone

S. M. Ortiz (509) 373-0908

Class of Change

[ I - Signatories [X] II - Executive Manager []III - Project Manager

Change Title

2017 Hanford Lifecycle Scope, Schedule and Cost Report (M-036-01G) Deletion

Description/Justification of Change

Each year, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepares and submits to the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) the Hanford Lifecycle

Scope, Schedule and Cost Report (Lifecycle Report), as required by Hanford Federal Facility Agreement

and Consent Order (HFFACO) Appendix D M-036-01 milestones.

The Hanford Site has been engaged in many substantial regulatory realignments, including but not limited to

a Modified Consent Decree between the DOE Office of River Protection and Ecology, a revised series of

milestones guiding cleanup of Hanford's Central Plateau, and a new set of milestones for retrieval and

packaging of transuranic waste at Hanford. These realignments have resulted in significant replanning of

associated work scope, schedules, and costs that cannot be completed in time to be fully reflected in the

2017 Lifecycle Report.

As a result, the Parties have determined that resources necessary to prepare a 2017 Lifecycle Report

should be focused on preparing the follow-on Lifecycle Reports. The Parties agree this is good cause to

delete the M-036-01 G milestone; thereby forgoing submittal of the Lifecycle Report in 2017 by DOE.

Continued on page 2.

Impact of Change

With the approval of this Change Control Form, M-036-01G will be deleted. No other HFFACO milestones

are impacted.

Affected Documents

The HFFACO, as amended, and Hanford Site internal planning management, and budget documents (e.g.,

USDOE and USDOE contractor Baseline Change Control documents, Project Management Plans).

Approvals

R. J. corey'1 2 2.c 5 L e _Approved Disapproved Page 1 of 3

DOE-RL X Date

T. W. Fletcher Approved Disapproved

DOE-ORP Date

D. A. Faulk L A roved Disapproved

EPA D tei

A. K. Smith A // ___Approved_ Disapproved

Ecology Date

AUG 312016

EDMCN
M-36-16-02

Page 2 of 3

Modifications are denoted by using strikeout to indicate text deletions and double underline to

indicate text additions.

M-036-04-G

Lead-Regulatey

AgeRGy+-Dual

The USQ6hall prepaRre and submit to EPA and Ecolgy a

roport setting out the Lifecyclc Scoepe, Schedule and Costfo

completion of the Hanford Sito Cleanup Mission. The report

shall re-flect all1 of tho-Se action9-s necess96ary for the USOQD-E tofully meet all applicable Envirnental obligations including

those under the HFFAC;O, the Consent Decree in Washingto

v. E uaue rNu. 08 oldzO r, uno trio nlaniur

v mvs WAWA= A .e. . . .I.L Tt.,

scnhedulod and coest for coempleting wo-rk at each of the operabl

units and RCRA TSID groups/units that are listedi

Appendixes BR and C of the HFFACO, in tho ConsenAt Doe-a

i n Washington v. DOE, Case TPRA . 08505 -3 and i

the Hanford RC-R-AIHWMA1hA Permit, including the HanforFd

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. The report will

i.mnlude all o-ther cleanup and monitoring activities, (including

post closure activities) and all related actions necessar,' to

complete the cleanup mission to provide a comnplt

understAanding of the resources necessary forF the H1anford

Genu SS!R.

This report shlbakeit acon ircmsm.tanmces existing as

of the end of the fiscal year preceding the month of the report,

including funds appropriated by Congress for the Hanford n k.,+,f fill nr,+ ,-n.II ~ i 1 i yr .fiflflf ^l an l; nf far

future years. Howevor, the report will take ino osider-ation

critical resource availabiliffty net based upon assumed future

funding limitations and the practical lim~its of projec

accelerationn when developing an executable plan. USIDOE

may also include costs other than these directly related to

environmtal o ebligations (such as secGurity costs) but shall !la ll f;i c0 k ~ at nAn if.i ira far #n~a !a+, aklinfmae~** . ~ . .

frem etner expenaiurs uests i;iI e aisplayec iey progra

hnarli'ae umm a + Addiiona ;nfr-mo+deanil nnA~

surnelen: aetaii to vavoeare consistency WnnR te scope ana

schedule for individuiial c-leanup projects. Reporting in the

appendixes Will typically be oeeve belo hk'w the PBS for the

lifacycle, and at levels blwth-at for the- next twAoC to five years

&, A 1 i 46, 4 4 4k

theo budget assigned to a sneciti nroioct. e.g.. - -~w-, -I

stailzatonand disposition PFP, disposition PFP, transition

231 6Z). EPA and EcGogy project managers may request

-J-u u~ :: mi:

Gounterpa~tcill ~ ~ 1A * prptu 1UPt' II*It4 Alp iY itY- V%^- 

been made, the reDort shall be based uoon the reaconable

0143142014

C17vanu up r r r7r C

0 "N 0 VACtM wri Ot2r MOUC2 v C2 0 C2" v v Wro vv ri
M-36-16-02

Page 3 of 3

upper bound of the range of plausible alteratives orF mayse

forth a range of alterative cos6ts including such A reasonable

upper bound. In making assumptions for the purpose of

prepaprg the initial report, USDOE= shall take into account the

views of EPA ;Ad Ecrology and shall alsoA take nt accoun-t th~e

values expressed by the affected Tribal goveFrnentsand

Hanfor-dstakeholders regarding werkecope, priorities and

schedule. The report shall inlu-deA the scope, schedule and

costsr. fo:r e-ach such PBS level two element andt- shall cot forth4

the bases a;nd assumptions for eac-h cleanup activity.

After UJSDOE submi~ts the roped, the UJSDOE w~ill revise the

report based upon EPA and EcoloGgy coGmmen-ts- to rcflect a

commoen vision of the scope, schedule and budget for the

remainder of thie clepan-up mission. If the agencies Are unIable

toeac resF-olution OR specific aspectAs of the sc-ope of cleanup

actions, the revised document Will present a range Of potential

actions with the socae schedu le and budget, thereby

completing the milestone. DOE, E=PA and Ecology shall

attempt to reach agreement on the report so it can serv'e as

an agreed upon foundation for preparing budget requests an

for ifrainlbriefings.c of affecGte-d TrFibal goverments and

Hanford stakeholders. The report shall also ser.'o as the basis

for~ ~ ~~FAR anuldsusin mn SDEF, EPA and Ecology On

howV and w.hen the UJSDOE- Will com;plete cleanup, how

Congressional appropriations for the Hanfoird site for that yea

ma" affect assumptions presented in the report, and hew

milestone c-hanges and adjustments will a;ffec.At lifecysle scOpe

schedule and cost.

ltheut limiting any DOE obligation under any othe

proisonsofthis agreement, and without limiting any DOE

olgation to disclose info-rmatio-n thaRt is otherwise publicly

aalable, nothing in this milestoAne hal e constred, either

alone or in combination with any other prGosion of the LJC AC'C' 4a m . r.rn .i . i -1-4- ~4nr - ;.d -4--- f-nn Anm .. I~ to rK7

budget deliberations.