alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 570.67 Occupations in roofing operations and on or about a roof (Order 16). ( a ) *Finding and declaration of fact.* All occupations in roofing operations and all occupations on or about a roof are particularly hazardous for the employment of minors between 16 and 18 years of age or detrimental to their health.
( b ) *Definitions. On or about a roof* includes all work performed upon or in close proximity to a roof, including carpentry and metal work, alterations, additions, maintenance and repair, including painting and coating of existing roofs; the construction of the sheathing or base of roofs (wood or metal), including roof trusses or joists; gutter and downspout work; the installation and servicing of television and communication equipment such as cable and satellite dishes; the installation and servicing of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment or similar appliances attached to roofs; and any similar work that is required to be performed on or about roofs. *Roofing operations* means all work performed in connection with the installation of roofs, including related metal work such as flashing, and applying weatherproofing materials and substances (such as waterproof membranes, tar, slag or pitch, asphalt prepared paper, tile, composite roofing materials, slate, metal, translucent materials, and shingles of asbestos, asphalt, wood or other materials) to roofs of buildings or other structures. The term also includes all jobs on the ground related to roofing operations such as roofing laborer, roofing helper, materials handler and tending a tar heater.
( c ) *Exemptions.* This section shall not apply to the employment of apprentices or student-learners under the conditions prescribed in § 570.50 (b) and (c).
[27 FR 102, Jan. 5, 1962. Redesignated at 28 FR 1634, Feb. 21, 1963, and amended at 28 FR 3450, Apr. 9, 1963. Redesignated and amended at 36 FR 25156, Dec. 29, 1971; 69 FR 57404, Dec. 16, 2004]
§ 4044.3 General rule. ( a ) *Asset allocation.* Upon the termination of a single-employer plan, the plan administrator shall allocate the plan assets available to pay for benefits under the plan in the manner prescribed by this subpart. Plan assets available to pay for benefits include all plan assets (valued according to § 4044.41(b)) remaining after the subtraction of all liabilities, other than liabilities for future benefit payments, paid or payable from plan assets under the provisions of the plan. Liabilities include expenses, fees and other administrative costs, and benefit payments due before the allocation date. Except as provided in § 4044.4(b), an irrevocable commitment by an insurer to pay a benefit, which commitment is in effect on the date of the asset allocation, is not considered a plan asset, and a benefit payable under such a commitment is excluded from the allocation process.
( b ) *Allocation date.* For plans that close out under § 4041.28 or § 4041.50, assets shall be allocated as of the date plan assets are to be distributed. For other plans, assets shall be allocated as of the termination date.
[61 FR 34059, July 1, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 34605, June 14, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,113
<PP&E>                                           1,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,088,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,517
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,141
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (608,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (608,304)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (608,304)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
#### § 4302.3 Penalty amount.

The maximum daily amount of the penalty under section 4302 of ERISA shall be $356.

[62 FR 36995, July 10, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 29767, May 13, 2016; 82 FR 8814, Jan. 31, 2017; 83 FR 1556, Jan. 12, 2018; 83 FR 67074, Dec. 28, 2018; 85 FR 2305, Jan. 15, 2020; 86 FR 2542, Jan. 13, 2021; 87 FR 2341, Jan. 14, 2022; 88 FR 1992, Jan. 12, 2023; 89 FR 2133, Jan. 12, 2024]
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April      15, 2009     |   |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                         |   |   |
| By:    | /s/      Wu Yiting      |   |   |
|   | Wu      Yiting               |   |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|   |                         |   |   |
| By:    | /s/      Wu Yaxu        |   |   |
|   | Wu      Yaxu                 |   |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer |
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 231 

Recognizing the historical significance of Juneteenth Independence Day and 

expressing the sense of the Senate that history should be regarded 

as a means for understanding the past and solving the challenges of 

the future. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. REID, Mr. OBAMA, Ms. STABENOW, 

and Mr. BROWNBACK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the historical significance of Juneteenth Independence Day and expressing the sense of the Senate 

that history should be regarded as a means for understanding the past and solving the challenges of the future. 

Whereas news of the end of slavery did not reach frontier 

areas of the United States, and in particular the Southwestern States, for more than 2 years after President 

Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 

1863, and months after the conclusion of the Civil War; 

Whereas, on June 19, 1865, Union soldiers led by Major 

General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 231 IS 

with news that the Civil War had ended and that the 

enslaved were free; 

Whereas African Americans who had been slaves in the 

Southwest celebrated June 19, commonly known as 

‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day’’, as the anniversary of 

their emancipation; 

Whereas African Americans from the Southwest continue the 

tradition of celebrating Juneteenth Independence Day as 

inspiration and encouragement for future generations; 

Whereas, for more than 140 years, Juneteenth Independence 

Day celebrations have been held to honor African American freedom while encouraging self-development and respect for all cultures; 

Whereas, although Juneteenth Independence Day is beginning to be recognized as a national, and even global, 

event, the history behind the celebration should not be 

forgotten; and 

Whereas the faith and strength of character demonstrated by 

former slaves remains an example for all people of the 

United States, regardless of background, religion, or 

race: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate— 

3 (A) recognizes the historical significance of 

4 Juneteenth Independence Day to the Nation; 

5 (B) supports the continued celebration of 

6 Juneteenth Independence Day to provide an op7 portunity for the people of the United States to 

8 learn more about the past and to understand 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 231 IS 

1 better the experiences that have shaped the Na2 tion; and 

3 (C) encourages the people of the United 

4 States to observe Juneteenth Independence Day 

5 with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and pro6 grams; and 

7 (2) it is the sense of the Senate that— 

8 (A) history should be regarded as a means 

9 for understanding the past and solving the chal10 lenges of the future; and 

11 (B) the celebration of the end of slavery is 

12 an important and enriching part of the history 

13 and heritage of the United States. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### § 44.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations of the U.S. Department of Labor establishing a process for the election of representatives of the States to participate in formal consultations with the Department of Labor for purposes of the development of an annual employment statistics plan and to address other employment statistics issues. The representatives are to be elected by and from the State employment statistics directors affiliated with the State agencies designated to carry out the employment statistics responsibilities under the revised section 15 of the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49 1-2), as amended by section 309 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. The revised section 15(d)(2) of the Wagner-Peyser Act requires the Secretary to establish a process for the election of such representatives from each of the 10 Federal regions of the Department of Labor.
#### The State, Appellant, v. Bregard.

1. Pleading, Criminal: keeping bawdy house. An indictment for keeping a bawdy house is well enough if it follows the language of the statute.

2. -. Where a statute uses disjunctive language in defining an offense, an indictment under it may be drawn in the conjunctive.

*Appeal from. Jackson Criminal*Court.—Hon. H. P. White, Judge.

Reversed.

*D. H. McIntyre,*Attorney General, for the State

*Tichenor & Warner*for respondent.

Sherwood, J.

The indictment charged that defendant on, etc., at, etc., “ did unlawfully set up and keep a common bawdy house.” The indictment is well enough, since it follows the language of the statute on which it is bottomed. R. S. 1879, p. 270, § 1550.

The only particular in which the precise language of the statute is not followed, is in the substitution of the word *and*for the word *or;*but this is proper as recently *323decided by this court. *State v. Pittman, ante,*p. 56. The authorities cited by the State fully sustain the validity of the indictment. Therefore, judgment reversed and cause remanded.

All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3322-000]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice Establishing Post-Technical 
Comment Period

    As indicated in the June 21, 2011 Notice in this docket, comments 
on the technical conference that was held on July 29, 2011, to discuss 
the performance measurement of demand response in PJM's capacity 
market, are due 15 days from the date of this conference, or Monday, 
August 15, 2011.

    Dated: July 29, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20045 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Date: 20150516 Revision: 1.0 Revision:1.0

Page 1 of 1

PRIVACY INFORMATION - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Appendix G

Public Interest

The UAS operations involving the DJI Phantom 2, Phantom 2+ and DJI Phantom 3 will 

be in the public interest for many reasons. The utilization of the UAS in the inspection and 

surveying of architectural sites will improve the quality of overall scientific information 

acquired. The use of a UAS to inspect the sites will increase the detail of the inspection and 

allow for an overall improvement in the quality of the inspection. The improved quality of the 

inspection will reduce the number of sorties required to inspect the sites in a given period and 

reduce the impact on the environment by inspection teams. The use of a UAS will also allow 

archaeologists the ability to see parts of the specified sites without also impacting or destroying 

the site with vehicular or foot traffic. 

There are probably several hundred archaeological sites in the southern Arizona and 

California deserts. Many of these sites are poorly documented, are being degraded by natural 

weathering processes, and by human impacts including off-highway vehicle use. A more 

complete photographic record of these fragile desert features is needed. CyberServices LLC can

utilize the UAS to record these endangered sites and ensure every resource is used to protect

them for future generations. 

Any operations which involve manned aircraft, other than cargo or passenger transport, 

can be conduct with less impact on the environment by a UAS. A UAS can conduct; aerial 

surveying, aerial photography, and mapping operations with little to no effect on the 

environment from noise, fuel vapor, fuel burn, fuel spills, damage from rotor wash, or many of 

the other dangerous side effects of the larger manned aircraft.
#### John Y. Vantyl *against*Isaac Marsh.

ON CERTIORARI.

Justice has not jurisdiction, in an action on the case for overflowing land, to the permanent injury of the freehold. *(a)*

THIS cause was argued by *Hornblower*for plaintiff, and *Scudder*for defendant. The case is stated by the Court.

(a)

*Blackwell vs. Leslie, 1 South. 112. Blackwell vs. Hagerman, Pen. *1032. Gregory vs. Kanouse, 6 Hal 62. Hill vs. Carter, 1 Har. 87. Dixon vs. Scott, 3 Har.430, Campfield vs. Johnson, 1 Zab. 83. Dickerson vs. Wadsworth, 4 Vr. 357.*See *Satterthwaite vs. Morgan, Pen. *962. Hankinson vs. Baird, 1 Hal. 130. Hunt*vs. *Morris, 7 Hal. 175. Pickle vs. Covenhoven, 1 South. 319.*

Southard J.

This was an action *on the case,*brought by *585*Marsh*against Vantyl, for erecting and keeping up a mill-dam on the river *Rahway,*by means whereof the waters ■ of the river were flowed back upon the lands whereof said *Marsh “*had a tenancy in fee-simple,” so that “ the grass, wood, timber, bushes, and shrubs, standing on the aforesaid tenancy of land, were corrupted, spoiled, and destroyed” so that the said *Marsh “*lost the use, profit, and advantage of said tenancy of land,” &c.

The only reason assigned for the reversal of the judgment is, that the Court for the trial of Small Causes had not jurisdiction of the cause. And I think the objection well taken. This action is distinguishable from the ordinary action of trespass upon laud, by the tenant in actual possession. It may be maintained by the tenant in fee, who is out of the possession, on his right to the estate, and for the permanent injury to the freehold. In it, the plaintiff sets out his title as tenant in fee, and he must prove it as set out. He must shew what his title is. 2 *Saun.*20(5-7. Even if the plaintiff here had not set out his title, in his state of demand or declaration, yet would he have been compelled to exhibit it on the trial. The injury lie complains of is not to the possession merely ; it is to the freehold; to the estate; and is altogether unlike the taking away or destroying fence, grass, &c. *The title here must come in question, and therefore the justice had not jurisdiction.

Kirkpatrick C. J.

I think this judgment must be reversed upon the ground that the justice had not jurisdiction of the subject matter. He had not jurisdiction. 1. Because the title to land necessarily came in question, and therefore he is restrained by the express provision of the statute. And 2. Because exercising a spfecial jurisdiction, created by statute, his mode of proceeding must be according to the rules prescribed by statute; he can neither vary from them nor go beyond them ; and having no power given to him to order a view of the land, which in cases of this kind, may be, and frequently is necessary, he is restrained by construction of law ; for it never can be intended that a citizen is to be deprived of his lawful *586rights, or means of defence, without express words to take away.

Rossell J. concurred.

Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Lonnie Lenarduzzi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Perma-Tune Electronics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Perma-Tune Electronics, Inc.


                                      By: /s/ Lonnie Lenarduzzi
                                        -----------------------
                                      Name: Lonnie Lenarduzzi
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                      November 13, 2002

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Linda Decker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Perma-Tune Electronics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Perma-Tune Electronics, Inc.

                                         By: /s/ Linda Decker
                                           ------------------
                                         Name: Linda Decker
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                         November 13, 2002
May 2015 Jason Youn Photography LLC

2342 W. 8th Ave

Mesa AZ 85202 Help@JasonYoun.com

480-207-7209

Dear Sir or Madam,

Jason Youn Photography LLC would like to submit the following as an

amendment to Docket No FAA-2014-0233. This is a petition to amend Exemption No. 11452:

Due to rapidly advancing UAS technology in both performance and safety mechanisms, Jason Youn Photography would like to amend Exemption No. 11452 to include more aircraft than are listed in the original exemption. These new unmanned aircraft (UAS) have several added safety mechanisms including but not limited to: *Ground looking cameras for more stability in flight. *More accurate GPS systems for greater reliability. *More reliable lifting motors to run the thrust propulsion systems. *More reliable computer based Engine Control Units. *Higher resolution video feeds to ground for greater situational awareness. *More flight data sent to the ground controls for grater situational awareness. *More reliable fail safe features for greater safety on the ground.! ! In recognition that technological innovations in safety advance at a rate that so rapid that there does exist a continual need for renewed amendments as new safety mechanisms become available, Jason Youn Photography llc would like to petition the FAA to amend Exemption No. 11452 so that all commercially available UASs under 55 pounds within Visual line of sight (VLOS) not to exceed 87 knots (100mph) and are in compliance with all provisions of Proposed Part 107 are included in the exemption.

The above paragraph is in keeping with the FAA’s publicly stated goal of maintaining flexibility to accommodate future technological innovation.

Yours,

Jason Youn Jason Youn Photography LLC 

## Petition to amend Exemption No. 11452
**EXHIBIT3.05**

** **

**ARTICLESOF AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**ARTICLESOF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**KENTUCKYUTILITIES COMPANY**

 

Pursuant to the provisionsof the Kentucky Revised Statutes and the Virginia Corporation Act, thefollowing Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of KentuckyUtilities Company, a Kentucky and Virginia corporation (the “Corporation”), arehereby adopted:

 

**FIRST:**              The name of theCorporation is Kentucky Utilities Company.

 

**SECOND**:         The text of the amendmentto Article Seventh of the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation is asfollows:

 

**“SEVENTH**:     All corporate powers shall beexercised by or under the authority of, and the business and affairs of thecorporation managed under the direction of, its Board of Directors.  The number of directors shall be fixed byresolution of the Board of Directors from time to time.

 

The Board of Directors ofthe corporation, to the extent not prohibited by law, shall have the power tocause the corporation to repurchase its own shares and shall have the power tomake distributions from time to time to the corporation’s shareholders.”

 

**THIRD**:             The above designatedamendments do not provide for an exchange, reclassification or cancellation ofissued shares of stock of the Corporation.

 

**FOURTH**:         The designated amendmentswere adopted by the Corporation’s Board of Directors on July 1, 2002, andsubmitted for approval by the Corporation’s sole shareholder entitled tovote.  The Corporation has 31,817,878outstanding shares of common stock, without 

 

----

 

par value, which are entitled to vote on theamendment.  One hundred percent of thecommon shares were indisputably represented at a duly called shareholders’meeting held on December 16, 2003, with 31,817,878 of the common sharesindisputably cast in favor of the amendment, such vote being sufficient forapproval of the amendment.  

 
| DATED: | February 6, 2004           |                                     |
|--------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Kentucky Utilities Company |
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | BY:                        |                                     |
|   |                       | John R. McCall                           |
|   |                       | Executive Vice President,                |
|   |                       | General Counsel and  Corporate Secretary |
|        |                            |                                          |  |  |

 

----