alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 2979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Applications; Notice of 
Extension of Comment Period

    The Fish and Wildlife Service gives notice that the comment period 
is extended on the notice of receipt of applications for two 
applications submitted by International Animal Consulting Group, Inc. 
The applications were submitted to satisfy requirements of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and 
the regulations governing marine mammals (50 CFR part 18). The 
applications, 018196 and 018197, are for conducting certain activities 
with marine mammals, specifically taking northern sea otters (Enhydra 
lutris lutris) from the wild in Alaska for export and public display at 
two Japanese aquariums. The extension will allow all interested parties 
to submit written comments. The Fish and Wildlife Service published a 
notice of receipt of the applications on Friday, December 17, 1999. The 
current comment period closes on January 16, 2000. Written comments may 
now be submitted until January 26, 2000, and should be submitted to the 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management 
Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 
22203.

    Dated: January 14, 2000.
Kristen Nelson,
Chief, Branch of Permits (Domestic), Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 00-1328 Filed 1-14-00; 2:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 171 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 171

Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the United States flag to 
  half-staff on the day of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial 
                    Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2007

  Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Biden, Mr. McCain, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
  Carper, and Mr. Dodd) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the United States flag to 
  half-staff on the day of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial 
                    Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

Whereas 1,100,000 men and women comprise the fire service in the United States;
Whereas the fire service is considered one of the most dangerous professions in 
        the United States;
Whereas fire service personnel selflessly respond to over 22,500,000 emergency 
        calls annually, without reservation and with an unwavering commitment to 
        the safety of their fellow citizens;
Whereas fire service personnel are the first to respond to an emergency, whether 
        it involves a fire, medical emergency, spill of hazardous materials, 
        natural disaster, act of terrorism, or transportation accident; and
Whereas approximately 100 fire service personnel die annually in the line of 
        duty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That this year, the United States flags on all Federal 
facilities should be lowered to half-staff on the day of the National 
Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.
                                 <all>
```
(75 South. 1005)

#### CENTRAL IRON & COAL CO. v. HAY.

(6 Div. 196.)

(Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1917.)

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court; H. B. Foster, Judge.

Henry A. Jones, of Tuscaloosa, for appellant. Brown & Ward, of Tuscaloosa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### GOLDSTEIN v ROUSEY, et

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co

No 3528.

Decided Feb. 3, 1930

Allen C. Roudebush, Cincinnati, for Gold-stein.

Leonard H. Freiberg, Cincinnati for Fouch.

*440CUSHING, PJ.

The petition states an action for a breach of contract, plaintiff ^claiming that the breach caused him damage in the sum of $5,000. The prayer of the petition is no part of it in so far as determining the nature of the cause of action, and while the prayer of the petition asks for specific performance and for damages, this does not change in any way the nature of the cause . of action. Plaintiff’s petition states an action at law.

Our conclusion is that the action is not one in chancery, and that the motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted.

An entry may be presented accordingly.

Ross and Hamilton, JJ, concur.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00248-CR

ERICA NICOLE MCCLURE

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-8-26018-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 31, 2014
[673 NE2d 1237, 651 NYS2d 10]

#### In the Matter of Hudson Falls Central School District, Respondent, v Saratoga County Industrial Development Agency, Appellant.

Argued September 11, 1996;

decided October 10, 1996

*1028APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Snyder, Kiley, Toohey & Corbett,*Saratoga Springs *(Michael J. Toohey*of counsel), for appellant.

*Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P. C.,*Glens Falls *(J. Lawrence Paltrowitz*and *James R. Burkett*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Thomas E. Mercure at the Appellate Division (217 AD2d 330).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith and Ciparick. Taking no part: Judge Levine.
p^rny tee kJels©r\ iHQliertS

Uh^

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 16 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

:-'S i'i i—23PSC3

1^ j&PR.'201S .PM :W> I

R Be* I/Z308

Aus-frn ,Tx, _ ' 761U-2*0*

|W||||>|l|HII|-.i.|i.j.l|.|ll1.l..,,.1|lll1|.:,jl.i,,.||.].l.-. 
RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPCM

APR 16 2015

Abel Acosta, Clei.
#### Heritage Company of Massena, Respondent, v Jovana Spaghetti House, Inc., Doing Business as The Orchard Restaurant, et al., Appellants. *775Jovana Spaghetti House, Inc., Doing Business as The Orchard Restaurant, Appellant, v Heritage Company of Massena et al., Respondents.

*774(Appeal No. 1.) *775(Appeal No. 2.)

Submitted May 8, 1995;

decided July 6, 1995

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the grant of partial summary judgment in action No. 1, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine action No. 1 within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 7, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

?::^^ARTMENTOF 

• /i'lSPORTATION 

OFFIC E O F HEARING S • ' - ' " ''''^''" -

WASHINGTON , D C ^ . 

'::;i ^iii -8 AM: 29 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NEBO AVIATION SERVICES, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-20I0-1078 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING WITH PREJUDICE 

By Respondent's Notice of Withdrawal of Hearing Request, served February 4, 2011, 

Respondent states that the above-captioned proceeding has been settled and that Respondent 

withdraws its request for hearing. Accordingly, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is 

dismissed with prejudice. The FAA shall send the Judge and the Docket a copy of any 

compromise order or final order assessing civil penalty. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A. Yot 

Chief AdministratiiJ^tiSw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10EA0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL i& ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Stephen W. Brice, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3268 

FAX: 716-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX; 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

-2-
#### § 784.124 Going to and returning from work.

The phrase “including the going to and returning from work” relates to the preceding named operations which pertain to the procuring and appropriation of seafood and other forms of aquatic life from nature. The expression obviously includes the time spent by fishermen and others who go to and from the fishing grounds or other locations where the aquatic life is reduced to possession. If going to work requires fishermen to prepare and carry the equipment required for the fishing operation, this would be included within the exemption. In performing such travel the fishermen may be required to row, guide or sail the boat or otherwise assist in its operation. Similarly, if an employee were digging for clams or other shellfish or gathering seaweed on the sand or rocks it might be necessary to drive a truck or other vehicle to reach his destination. Such activities are exempt within the meaning of this language. However, the phrase does not apply to employees who are not employed in the activities involved in the acquisition of aquatic animal or vegetable life, such as those going to or returning from work at processing or refrigerator plants or wholesale establishments.
RICHARD E. ZALDIVAR, P.A., 

Former Counsel for Employee 

Claimant,

Appellant,

v.

DYKE INDUSTRIES, INC., 

LIBERTY MUTUAL, and 

ALAIN DEBESA,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1529

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Charles M. Hill, III, Judge.

Date of Accident: January 13, 2014.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Albert Marroquin 

of Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Edward C. Duncan, III, of the Law Offices of Amy L. Warpinski, Fort Myers, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The court having received the September 6, 2016, order of the Supreme Court 

of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of July 8, 2015, and remanding the matter 
2

for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192 So. 3d 

431 (Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion, the 

order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED, and this case is 

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED. 

B.L. THOMAS, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 30, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34472-34473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13378]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Contract Review Meeting

    In accordance with section 10 (a) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of an 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Technical Review 
Committee (TRC) meeting. This TRC's charge is to provide review of 
contract proposals and recommendations to the Director, AHRQ, regarding 
the technical merit of proposals submitted in response to a Request for 
Proposals (RFPs) to ``Maintain and Expand the Healthcare Cost and 
Utilization Project (HCUP)''. The RFP was published in the Commerce 
Business Daily on March 30, 2000.
    The upcoming TRC meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), section 10(d) of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2, implementing regulations, and procurement 
regulations, 41 CFR 101-6.1023 and 48 CFR section 315.604(d). The 
discussions at this meeting of contract proposals submitted in response 
to the above-referenced RFP are likely to reveal proprietary and 
personal information concerning

[[Page 34473]]

individuals associated with the proposals. Such information is exempt 
from disclosure under the above-cited FACA provision that protects the 
the free exchange of candid views, and under the procurement rules that 
prevent undue interference with Committee and Department operations.
    Name of TRC: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-- 
``Maintain and Expand the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 
(HCUP)''.
    Date: June 14, 2000 (Closed to the public).
    Place: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 6010 Executive 
Blvd, 4th Floor Conference Center, Room D, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain information regarding this 
meeting should contact Jenny Schnaier, Center for Organizaton and 
Delivery Systems, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2102 East 
Jefferson Street, Suite 605, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, 301-594-6827.

    Dated: May 22, 2000.
John M. Eisenberg,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-13378 Filed 5-26-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160--90--M
EXHIBIT 23

                              CONSENT OF EXPERTS










<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                         Exhibit 23




                                            





The Board of Directors
The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-79097, No. 2-98948, No. 33-22108, No. 33-22338, No. 33-37814, No. 33-
56209, No. 33-62923 and No. 33-56211 on Form S-8, No. 33-48339, No. 33-50991
and No. 333-16191 on Form S-3 and No. 33-6593 on Form S-4 of The Louisiana
Land and Exploration Company of our reports dated February 7, 1997, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of The Louisiana Land and Exploration
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996
which reports appear in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of
The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company.  Our reports refer to the change
in 1994 of the methods of assessing the impairment of the capitalized costs
of proved oil and gas properties and other long-lived assets.  

We also consent to incorporation by reference in the previously referred to
Registration Statements of our report dated January 28, 1997, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of MaraLou Netherlands Partnership and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated
statements of income, partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996 which report appears
in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of The Louisiana Land
and Exploration Company.  


/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
March 19, 1997
Exhibit 32.1


                         Section 906 Certification
                         -------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form 10-Q of the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

        The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the MLM Index Fund.



August 14, 2003



/s/ Timothy J. Rudderow
-------------------------------------------
President
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund
Argued and submitted November 30,

remanded for resentencing in part; otherwise affirmed December 23, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*WESLEY RAYMOND CROCKRELL, *Appellant.*

(10-91-08474; CA A73594)

844 P2d 239

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy L. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*358PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.375; ORS 163.427. He argues that the court erred in first sentencing him on the sexual abuse conviction and then using that conviction to increase his criminal history score on the rape conviction. The state concedes that, under *State v. Seals,*113 Or App 700, 833 P2d 1344 (1992), and *State v. Bucholz,*113 Or App 705, 834 P2d 456 (1992), defendant is correct. It argues that the remedy is to remand both convictions for resentencing. Resentencing is required on the conviction for rape that was erroneously imposed. There is no error to correct in the sentence for the conviction for sexual abuse. *State v. Smith,*116 Or App 558, 842 P2d 805 (1992).

Remanded for resentencing on conviction for rape in the first degree; otherwise affirmed.
Exhibit10.1-2ndAmend2010EquityPlan






Exhibit 10.1


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE REALPAGE, INC. 
2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective June 4, 2014)
This Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the RealPage, Inc. (the “Company”) 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated June 4, 2014 (as amended, the “Plan”) is adopted as of April 1, 2015 (the “Date of Amendment”) by the Board.  All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them by the Plan.
Effective as of the Date of Amendment, the Plan is amended as follows:
1.    Annual Award to Outside Directors.  Sections 12(c) and 12(d) of the Plan are hereby amended and restated to read in their entirety as follows: 
(c)  Annual Award.  Each Outside Director will be automatically granted (an “Annual Award”) on April 1 of each year, beginning in 2015, a number of Shares of Restricted Stock determined by dividing (A) $140,000 by (B) the Fair Market Value of a share on the grant date, with the number of Shares rounded up to the nearest whole Share.  If the initial election or appointment of such Outside Director occurs on any date other than April 1st, such Outside Director will also be automatically granted a prorated portion of the Annual Award on the date of such election or appointment.  The prorated number of Shares of Restricted Stock shall be determined based on the number of complete months remaining between the date of election or appointment and the next April 1st. 
(d)  Terms.  The terms of each Award granted pursuant to this Section will be as follows:  The Restricted Stock awarded under each Annual Award will be issued for no cash consideration and will be forfeited and automatically transferred to and reacquired by the Company at no cost upon the date the Director ceases to provide services as a member of the Board (the “Forfeiture Provision”).  The Forfeiture Provision will lapse as to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Restricted Stock awarded in such Annual Award on the first day of each calendar quarter for four (4) calendar quarters beginning on the first day of the calendar quarter immediately following the date of grant, provided that the Participant continues to serve as a Director through such dates. 
2.    Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, without reference to principles of conflict of laws.
RealPage, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Second Amendment to the Plan on the date indicated below.
REALPAGE, INC.




By:  /s/ Stephen T. Winn                   
Stephen T. Winn
Chief Executive Officer
Chairman of the Board


Date:  April 1, 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 22

                            PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION
                             List of Subsidiaries





EVD Holdings Inc. (Delaware)*
Choube Shiren Export Company Ltd. (inactive) (Iran)
Rishmac Produce & Export Co (Iran)
Boam Produce (Europe) Est. (inactive) (Liechtenstein)
Mafco Establishment (Liechtenstein)
Jensen-Kelly Corporation (Delaware)
American Brake Shoe Company (Delaware)
NWL Control Systems, Inc. (Michigan)
Stanray Corporation (Delaware)
NWL Service Corp. (Delaware)




* Subsidiaries of EVD Holdings;
      EVD Holdings S.A. (France)
      Extraits Vegetaux et Derives S.A. (France)
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATIONS


I, Antoine J. Lafargue, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Magellan Petroleum Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. By:/s/ Antoine J. LafargueAntoine J. Lafargue,  Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary(as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:October 28, 2015
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-3284

___________________________ 

William L. Stringer

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

LaDonna Wilcox, Sergeant of Property; Adam Benda, Property Captain; Chris 

Tripp, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary; John Martinez, Property Captain; Robin 

Bagby, Assistant Deputy Director/Retired; Chad Congas, Shift Captain; Doug 

Bolton, Deputy Warden; Linda Koechle, Correctional Officer; Terry Hamm, 

Business Office Supervisor I.S.P.; Randy Gibbs, Deputy Director of Institutions; 

Beth Skinner, Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections; Rebecca Bowker, 

Executive Officer/Grievance Officer; Brad Hoenig, Associate Warden of 

Treatment

 Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central 

____________ 

Submitted: July 23, 2024

Filed: July 26, 2024 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
-2- 

William Stringer appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary 

judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291, this court affirms.

After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on 

appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jessie v. Potter, 

516 F.3d 709, 712 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa.